alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources of northeast North Carolina      

      January 1, 1978    

View Document

Several water-related problems are associated with economic development of northeast North Carolina. The solution to these problems depends in part on adequate knowledge of the hydrology of this 8,930 square mile coastal area. Average annual precipitation on the area is about 50 inches. Of this amount, about 34 inches returns to the atmosphere by evapotranspiration, about 15 inches leaves the area as runoff, and about one inch leaves through ground-water outflow. No large stream originates within the area, but major streams entering from the north and west bring in three times as much streamflow as originates within the study area. The flat, low-lying terrane does not offer opportunities for extensive development of surface-water supplies through the use of reservoirs. Much of the surface water is contaminated by saltwater from the ocean. Ground water occurs in three major aquifers, all of which contain both freshwater and saltwater.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Carolina

View All **
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0306

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM176AD

AMM R33 --- 2/15/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
John BARRETT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4022

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Javier GOMEZ and Karla Gomez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2494 3D17-1392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   540,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (540,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.02


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: CASE NO.: 21-18481-MAM

Chapter 7

NITV LLC

Debtor

___________________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF EX PARTE ORDER [ECF NO. 9] APPROVING 

TRUSTEE’S APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT OF TRUSTEE’S 

ATTORNEY [ECF NO. 8]

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Florida, and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications 

to practice in this Court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Ex Parte Order [ECF No. 9] 

Approving Trustee’s Application for Employment of Trustee’s Attorney [ECF No. 8] was 

served on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached service list, either 

via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF, or by first class U.S. 

mail on those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically as indicated

below.

 Dated: October 12, 2021.

MICHAEL R. BAKST, TRUSTEE

/s/ MICHAEL R. BAKST

__________________________________

Michael R. Bakst, Trustee

P.O. Box 407

West Palm Beach, FL 33402

Telephone: (561) 838-4539

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service 

for this case. 

Case 21-18481-MAM Doc 11 Filed 10/12/21 Page 1 of 2
• Michael R Bakst efilemrb@gmlaw.com, 

ecf.alert+Bakst@titlexi.com;efileu1084@gmlaw.com;efileu1086@gmlaw.com;efileu386

@gmlaw.com;efileu1857@gmlaw.com

• Julianne R. Frank julianne@jrfesq.com, G59511@notify.cincompass.com

• Mark A Levy mark.levy@brinkleymorgan.com, 

sandra.gonzalez@brinkleymorgan.com;brinkleymorganecf@gmail.com

• Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

Manual Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are not on the list to receive email notice/service for this 

case (who therefore require manual noticing/service 

(No manual recipients)

Case 21-18481-MAM Doc 11 Filed 10/12/21 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5328 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require a general notice of proposed 

rule making for a major rule to include a cost-benefit analysis of the 

proposed rule, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2016 

Mr. BOUSTANY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require a general 

notice of proposed rule making for a major rule to include a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed rule, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Agency Com5 plete Transparency Act of 2016’’ or the ‘‘FACT Act of 

6 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5328 IH

1 SEC. 2. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS REQUIRED TO BE IN2 CLUDED IN GENERAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED 

3 RULE MAKING. 

4 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(4) in the case of a major rule (as such term 

13 is defined in section 804), a cost-benefit analysis of 

14 the proposed rule, including any data or formula 

15 used for purposes of such analysis.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CinderCone

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Presentations and Events        May 26, 2016        Forecasting Ashfall Impacts from a Yellowstone Supereruption
October 2, 2015

Ms. Joanne Williamson

Hawaiian Electric Companies

820 Ward Avenue

Honolulu, HI 96814

Dear Ms. Williamson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 4, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Hawaiian Electrics 

Companies filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2819, but we are unable to process your request 

any further. Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

West Palm Beach Division

In re: Case No. 22-12084-EPK

Chapter 11

DAMACA INVESTMENTS LLC

Debtor /

 

DECLARATION OF PROPOSED ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR IN POSSESSION

Laudy Luna, Esq. declares as follows:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Florida and the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida and qualified to practice in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court 

for the Southern District of Florida.

2. I am an attorney in the law firm of Cuneo, Reyes & Luna, LLC, with offices located at 

2655 S. Le Jeune, Rd., Suite 805, Coral Gables, FL 33134.

3. Neither I nor the firm represent any interest adverse to the debtor, or the estate, and we 

are disinterested persons as required by 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).

4. Except for the continuing representation of the Debtor, neither I nor the firm has or will 

represent any other entity in connection with this case and neither I nor the firm will accept any 

fee from any other party or parties in this case, except the debtor in possession, its affiliated debtors 

in possession, or its principal.

5. I have received a prepetition retainer of $15,000.00, of this amount $3,735.00 was applied 

to the time incurred prior to Basa Investments LLC’s Bankruptcy filing filed on January 31, 2022, 

$1,575.00 was applied to time incurred with respect to the pre-bankruptcy work with respect to 

Case 22-12084-EPK Doc 16-1 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 22-12084-EPK Doc 16-1 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 2
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00369

- CR

Martha Missimer

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 355th District Court

o f Hood County (CR12624 )

July 2, 20 15

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRI CT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(20)
              - 2023(7)
              - 2022(11)
              - 2021(6)
              - 2020(3)
              - (-)2019(3)

partnerInstitute of Atmospheric  Physics - Chinese Academy of Sciences

partnerInstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht (IMAU)

partnerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - National Weather Service - Fire Weather
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - (-)news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        September 2, 2015        What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard 

Podcasts        June 10, 2012        USGS CoreCast: Landslide Hazards

Podcasts        July 27, 2011        Climate Connections: Questions from North and South Carolina
* Edmund G. Brown Jr., is substituted for his predecessor, Bill Lockyer,

as Attorney General of California. Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

 ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT JEFFRY FEIGER,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Attorney

General,*

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 08-56495

D.C. No. 3:05-cv-01754-L-PCL

MEMORANDUM**

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

M. James Lorenz, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2010*** 

Pasadena, California

Before: TROTT, WARDLAW, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

DEC 15 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-2-

The district court did not err in denying Feiger’s petition and his demand for

an evidentiary hearing, because Feiger did not allege facts which, if proved, would

entitle him to relief under AEDPA. Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 312 (1963),

overruled in part on other grounds by Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 5

(1992); West v. Ryan, 608 F.3d 477, 485 (9th Cir. 2010). Specifically, Feiger

failed to identify any clearly established Supreme Court precedent holding that

inferences jurors draw from testimony by trial witnesses are within the class of

“extraneous” influences that necessitate an evidentiary hearing or reversal of a

conviction. See Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107, 117–18 (1987); Remmer v.

United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 (1954). For the same reason, the state court’s

determination that Feiger was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing was not an

unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent. Further, “[c]learly

established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court, does not require state

or federal courts to hold a hearing every time a claim of juror bias is raised.” 

Tracey v. Palmateer, 341 F.3d 1037, 1045 (9th Cir. 2003). 

AFFIRMED.
Robert B. LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3859

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5421 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to apply the exemption from State 

regulation of securities offerings to securities listed on a national security 

exchange that has listing standards that have been approved by the 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2016 

Mr. ROYCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to apply the exemption 

from State regulation of securities offerings to securities 

listed on a national security exchange that has listing 

standards that have been approved by the Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Securities 

5 Exchange Regulatory Parity Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

8 U.S.C. 77r(b)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5421 IH

1 (1) by striking subparagraph (A); 

2 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘that the 

3 Commission determines by rule (on its own initiative 

4 or on the basis of a petition) are substantially simi5 lar to the listing standards applicable to securities 

6 described in subparagraph (A)’’ and inserting ‘‘that 

7 has been approved by the Commission’’; 

8 (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or (B)’’; 

9 and 

10 (4) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and 

11 (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jonathan E. JONES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of Innovative Companies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mihir K. TanejaMihir K. Taneja Chief Executive Officer February 17, 2004




19
Mark Andrew KALINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4995

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 222 /Wednesday, November 18, 1998 / Notices 64143

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 98D–0964]

Draft ‘‘Guidance for Industry: Content

and Format of Chemistry,

Manufacturing and Controls

Information and Establishment

Description Information for a

Biological In Vitro Diagnostic

Product;’’ Availability

Correction

In notice document 98–30094,

beginning on page 63067, in the issue of

Tuesday, November 10, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 63067, in the second column,

in the DATES: section, in the fourth line,

‘‘1998’’ should read ‘‘1999’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Daniel JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - nevada(1)

## By Year

State News Release        April 3, 2014        Natural Perchlorate Levels in a Desert Ecosystem

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

State News Release        February 17, 2015        Dr. Jill Baron New Director of North American Nitrogen Center