alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Very high Middle Miocene surface productivity on the U.S. mid-Atlantic shelf amid glacioeustatic sea level variability      

      September 30, 2022    

The Miocene Climatic Optimum (MCO) provides important insights into how the climate system operates under elevated temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels. Few western North Atlantic paleotemperature or paleoecological records exist from the MCO, despite their importance for understanding both regional and global climate dynamics. Here we present quantitative MCO paleoecological data from the western North Atlantic, specifically from the Baltimore Gas & Electric (BG&E) marine sediment core from southern Maryland, USA. We examine alkenones and planktic foraminifera and document the first sea surface temperature (SST) and productivity estimates for the MCO and the Middle Miocene Climate Transition (MMCT) from the continental shelf. Increased levels of planktic foraminifer species diversity and surface productivity accompany high sea level intervals of the MCO, indicating coastal upwelling. Cooling episodes correlate to unconformities in the BG&E core that reflect sea level lowstands; these and sedimentary cycles tie the record to eccentricity-paced Antarctic ice sheet growth and decay. This dynamic record not only captures the variability in SST, sea level and coastal productivity during the warm MCO and the transition to cooler global temperatures during the MMCT, but it also demonstrates the variability in local conditions within and between intervals of high sea level.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Marci M Robinson, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

mmrobinson@usgs.gov

703-648-5291

#### Harry Dowsett, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

hdowsett@usgs.gov

703-648-5282

## Related Content

#### Marci M Robinson, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

mmrobinson@usgs.gov

703-648-5291

#### Harry Dowsett, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

hdowsett@usgs.gov

703-648-5282

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Florence Bascom Geoscience Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

703-648-5953

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Maryland
                  - Calvert Cliffs outcrops
                  -  North Atlantic Ocean

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - (-)oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

publication        May 3, 2008        Occurrence of chlorothalonil, its transformation products, and selected other pesticides in Texas and Oklahoma streams, 2003-2004

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the
annual report on Form 20-F of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2016
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, YU Dehui, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:





| | (1) | The annual report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 18, 2017 
By: /s/YU Dehui 
Name:
YU Dehui

Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Simulated tsunami inundation for a range of Cascadia megathrust earthquake scenarios at Bandon, Oregon, USA      

      November 1, 2013    

Characterizations of tsunami hazards along the Cascadia subduction zone hinge on uncertainties in megathrust rupture models used for simulating tsunami inundation. To explore these uncertainties, we constructed 15 megathrust earthquake scenarios using rupture models that supply the initial conditions for tsunami simulations at Bandon, Oregon. Tsunami inundation varies with the amount and distribution of fault slip assigned to rupture models, including models where slip is partitioned to a splay fault in the accretionary wedge and models that vary the updip limit of slip on a buried fault. Constraints on fault slip come from onshore and offshore paleoseismological evidence. We rank each rupture model using a logic tree that evaluates a model’s consistency with geological and geophysical data. The scenarios provide inputs to a hydrodynamic model, SELFE, used to simulate tsunami generation, propagation, and inundation on unstructured grids with <5–15 m resolution in coastal areas. Tsunami simulations delineate the likelihood that Cascadia tsunamis will exceed mapped inundation lines. Maximum wave elevations at the shoreline varied from ∼4 m to 25 m for earthquakes with 9–44 m slip and Mw 8.7–9.2. Simulated tsunami inundation agrees with sparse deposits left by the A.D. 1700 and older tsunamis. Tsunami simulations for large (22–30 m slip) and medium (14–19 m slip) splay fault scenarios encompass 80%–95% of all inundation scenarios and provide reasonable guidelines for land-use planning and coastal development. The maximum tsunami inundation simulated for the greatest splay fault scenario (36–44 m slip) can help to guide development of local tsunami evacuation zones.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Rob Witter, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

rwitter@usgs.gov

907-786-7404

## Related Content

#### Rob Witter, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

rwitter@usgs.gov

907-786-7404

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon

View All **
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Klaus P. Besier, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Firepond, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 12, 2003

/s/ Klaus P. Besier
-------------------------------
Klaus P. Besier
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2020284EN.01000201.xml

| 28.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9460 – Capgemini/Altran)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 284/02)

On 23 October 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9460. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9460. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Trevor
      Drinkwater, Chief Executive Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the “Registrant”),
      do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
      United States Code that:




(1)
      the
      Registrant's Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period
      ended
      September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an
      exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                September 26, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Trevor DrinkwaterTrevor
                Drinkwater
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk April 3, 2019

159160 (11)

159201 (11)

In re HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION

REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF

2018 PA 368 & 369 SC: 159160

_________________________________________ _

/

In re SENATE REQUEST FOR ADVISORY

OPINION REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY

OF 2018 PA 368 & 36 9 SC: 159201

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Legislature to file a reply

to the brief amicus curiae filed by Michigan One Fair Wage et al . is GRANTED. The

reply submitted on March 27, 2019, is accepted for filing.
Gary GAVERS, Appellant, v. ESPACIO MIAMI PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of NDS Group plc (the registrant) for the three months
ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the report), I, Abraham Peled, Executive Director, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge: 1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  By /s/ Abraham
Peled_______________________________ Abraham Peled
Chief Executive Officer Date: February 8, 2005 E-35
lANCE R. LEFLEUR DIRECTOR Birmingham Branch 110 Vulcan Road Birmingham,
AL 35209-4702 (205) 942-{)168 (205) 941-1603 (FAX) October
9, 2014 Alabama Department
of Environmental Management adem.alabama.gov 1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110·2400

• Post Office Box 301463 Montgomery, Alabama 36130·1463 (334) 271-7700

• FAX (334) 271-7950 Ms. Heather McTeer Toney Regional Administrator, EPA Region

4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960

RoBERT
J. BENTLEY GovERNOR RE: Withdrawal ofthe PM2.5 SILs and Interpollutant Offset Ratios from the State of Alabama's State Implementation Plan Revision request dated May 2, 2011 Ms. Toney: On May 2, 201I, the Alabama Department
of Environmental Management (ADEM) submitted

a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
to EPA Region

4 to incorporate federal requirements
for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5). Revisions were made to the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and New Source Review (NSR) regulations

in Chapter 335-3-I4
to align ADEM's regulations with EPA's regulations and requirements

as published on December 31, 2002, November 29, 2005, May I6, 2008, and October 20, 20IO. In the preamble
to the May I6, 2008, final rule, EPA included preferred
or presumptive offset ratios for specific PM2.5 precursors that states could adopt in conjunction with the new interpollutant offset provisions for PM2.5. These ratios were subsequently the subject of a petition for reconsideration, which the EPA Administrator granted. Therefore, EPA no longer supports the ratios as presumptively approvable for adoption
in SIPs containing nonattainment NSR programs for PM2.5. On January 22, 20 I3, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Court) granted

a request from EPA to vacate and remand to the EPA the portions of the PSD PM2.5 rules addressing the Significant Impact Levels (SILs) for PM2.5 (found in paragraph (k)(2) in 40 CFR 51.166 and 52.2I ), as well asother portions,
sothat EPA could voluntarily correct anerrorin the provisions. On December

9, 20I3, EPA issued

a final rulemaking

to removethe vacated/remanded SILs and other provisions from the federal PSD regulations (78 FR 73698). Due to the Court's decision to grant EPA's request to vacate and remand the portions of the PM2.5 rules addressing the SILs for PM2.5, the intended purposeof ADEM's May 2, 20 II, SIP revision to be consistent with federal regulations regarding these provisions,

is no longer valid. Therefore, ADEM requests that this letter serveasits request to withdraw Decatur Branch 2715 Sandlin Road, S.W. Decatur, AL 35603-1333 (256) 353·1713 (256) 340-9359 (FAX)

*

* Mobile Branch 2204 Perimeter Road Mobile, AL 36615-1131 (251) 450-3400 (251) 479 2593 (FAX) Mobile-Coastal 3664 Dauphin Street, Suite B Mobile, AL 36608 (251) 304·1176 (251) 304-1189 (FAX)Ms.HeatherMcTeerToney

2October
9,2014 thePM2.5SILsandtheinterpollutantoffsetratioportionsoftheState'sMay2,2011,SIP revision. Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorcomments,pleasecontactChrisHowardofmystaffat(334) 271-7878. **Si~£a/~** RonaldW.Gore,Chief AirDivision RWG/ADH/bdc
Judy HAGNER, Appellant, v. JOHN E. POLK CORRECTIONS and Seminole County Sheriff's Department c/o Sheriff Donald Eslinger, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-892

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Martinez WATTS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D18-1377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018

Martinez Watts, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

LINDSEY, J.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on a post-conviction motion filed by Martinez Watts pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court summarily denied Watts's motion on May 17, 2016. We have previously affirmed this same order denying Watts's Rule 3.850 motion. *See* *Watts v. State*, 206 So.3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), *mandamus dismissed,* 2017 WL 822362 (Fla. Mar. 2, 2017) ; *see also* *342*Watts v. State*, 233 So.3d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA), *reh'g denied,* 233 So.3d 1109 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Aside from the fact that this Court has adjudicated prior petitions seeking the same relief, the instant petition must be denied. *See* *Martin v. Marko*, 564 So.2d 518, 519 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (holding that a writ of mandamus is permissible "only to command an inferior court to perform an act involving no exercise of discretion"); *see also* *Bailem v. State*, 984 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (denying the petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motion for post-conviction relief after the trial court had summarily denied the motion).

Mandamus relief is only available to compel a lower court to perform a ministerial duty. *Bailem*, 984 So.2d at 606 (citation omitted). Whether to grant an evidentiary hearing before ruling on a post-conviction motion is not a ministerial duty. Rather, a trial court's "decision of whether to grant an evidentiary hearing on a [post-conviction] motion is ultimately based on the written materials before the court, and the ruling of the postconviction trial court on that issue is tantamount to a pure question of law subject to *de novo* review." *Anderson v. State*, 220 So.3d 1133, 1142 (Fla. 2017) (quoting *Troy v. State*, 57 So.3d 828, 834 (Fla. 2011) (emphasis added). Thus, the fact that the trial court ruled on Watts' motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing is not the proper subject of a petition for mandamus. Further, Watts had an adequate remedy of which he has availed himself in seeking review of the trial court's summary denial by way of a direct appeal.

Petition denied.
John G. SCHANCK, Petitioner, v. William M. GAYHART and Debra L. Buchanan, as co-personal representatives of the Estate of Myong-he Gayhart, Respondents.

No. 1D17-3614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
MIAMI REAL ESTATE INVEST, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. BEINI XU, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D17-2332 & 3D17-1764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

Simon, Schindler & Sandberg, LLP, and Roger J. Schindler, Miami, for appellant.

Lydecker | Diaz, and Joan Carlos Wizel, Miami, for appellees.

Before SALTER, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*293Affirmed. *See**Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co.*, 911 So.2d 1181, 1189 (Fla. 2005) (holding that "to earn a commission a broker must perform two essential tasks: First, the broker must 'initiate negotiations by doing some affirmative act to bring the buyer and seller together.' Second, the broker must remain 'involved in the continuing negotiations between the seller and the buyer,' unless 'the seller and buyer intentionally exclude the broker from the negotiations.' Whether a broker has performed these tasks 'is a question of fact that the fact-finder must determine from the surrounding circumstances. Appellate courts uphold such determinations when supported by competent, substantial evidence' ") (internal citations omitted). *See also**Brickell Bayview Real Estate, Inc. v. Cooper*, 691 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding that trial court's determination that appellant was not the procuring cause of the sale was supported by competent substantial evidence and hence could not be disturbed on appeal); *Zupnik Haverland LLC v. Current Builders of Fla., Inc.*, 7 So.3d 1132, 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding: "The lower court's ultimate factual determinations during a non-jury trial may not be disturbed on appeal unless shown to be unsupported by competent and substantial evidence or to constitute an abuse of discretion").
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        December 15, 2020        High elevation ice patch documents Holocene climate variability in the northern Rocky Mountains