alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Syngenta See ds, Inc. CR002

- EPA

- 1 Page 6 of 151 List of Accompanying Volumes (continued)

Vol. Category 1 Volume/Study Title MRID

9 B Kurtz, R. (2011). Insect Resistance Management Plan

for Bt11xMIR604xTC1507x5307 Maize

. NRA

- 106

- 11

1

– Categorization code for placement of documents in the Public Docket

Company Official: April 1, 2011

David J. Mason, Jr., Ph.D. Date

Regulatory Affairs Manager

Company Name: Syngenta Seeds, Inc.

- Field Crops

- NAFTA

Company Contact: David J. Mason, Jr., Ph.D. / Tel. (919) 226

- 7377
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5440 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5440

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain regulated 
companies to elect out of the public utility property energy investment 
      tax credit limitation in the case of solar energy property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2016

  Mr. Rice of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain regulated 
companies to elect out of the public utility property energy investment 
      tax credit limitation in the case of solar energy property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTION OUT OF PUBLIC UTILITY PROPERTY LIMITATION WITH 
              RESPECT TO SOLAR ENERGY PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 50(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following: ``At the election of a 
taxpayer with respect to public utility property, paragraph (2) shall 
not apply to energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3)) which 
uses solar energy and is placed in service by the taxpayer after 
December 31, 2015. Such election shall be made on a property-by-
property basis on a timely filed return for the taxable year in which 
such property is placed in service, and once made, may be revoked only 
with the consent of the Secretary. No such election may be made by the 
taxpayer if such election is required by a State or political 
subdivision thereof, by any agency or instrumentality of the United 
States, or by a public service or public utility commission or other 
similar body of any State or political subdivision thereof.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-53276; File No. SR-NASD-2005-098]

      ( print page 9863)    

### Correction

In notice document E6-2368 beginning on page 8875 in the issue of Tuesday, February 21, 2006, make the following correction:

On page 8877, in the third column, in the second and third lines from the top, “March 10, 2006” should read “March 14, 2006”.

[FR Doc. Z6-2368 Filed 2-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Kelvin FRAZIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2280

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
STATE EX REL. Willie THOMAS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1653

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied; moot. R.S. 15:574.4(H).
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 12, 2008        TRUE or FALSE: Portland, Oregon, has a volcano within its metropolitan area.
# C_2020204EN.01001001.xml

| 18.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9331 – Danaher/GE Healthcare Life Sciences Biopharma)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 204/04)

On 18 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9331. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9331. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 3.1
-----------



                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                           GRAVITY SPIN HOLDINGS, INC.

     "I, the undersigned Graham Taylor, President of Gravity Spin Holdings,
Inc.(the "Company"), does hereby certify that the Board of Directors of said
Company at a meeting duly convened held on the 9th day of January, 2004, adopted
a resolution to amend the original articles as follows:


                                  A. ARTICLE I

     The name of the corporation is: Gravity Spin Holdings, Inc.

     Article I is hereby amended to read as follows:

     The name of the corporation is: Magnus International Resources Inc.


                                 B. Article III

     The corporation is authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of common stock
with a par value of $0.001/share.

     Article III is hereby amended to read as follows:

     The corporation is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock
with a par value of $0.001/share.

The purpose of the amendment to Article III is to give effect to a 1:2 forward
stock split of the Company's Common Stock (the "Forward Stock Split") and to
increase the authorized capital of the Company from 25,000,000 shares of common
stock to 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001/share.

The number of shares of the Company issued and outstanding and entitled to vote
on amendments to the Articles of Incorporation is Ten Million Seven Hundred
Seventy One Thousand Sixty Six (10,771,066) common $0.001 par value stock, that
the said changes and amendments have been consented to and approved by a vote of
the stockholders holding at least a majority of each class of stock outstanding
and entitled to vote thereon.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gravity Spin Holdings, Inc. has caused these presents
to be signed in its name and on its behalf by Graham Taylor, its President on
this 29th day of March, 2004, and its President acknowledges that this
Certificate of Amendment is the act and deed of Gravity Spin Holdings, Inc.,
and, under the penalties of perjury, that the matters and facts set forth herein
with respect to authorization and approval are true in all material respects to
the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

                                        GRAVITY SPIN HOLDINGS, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Graham Taylor
                                           -------------------------
                                           Graham Taylor, President"
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 24 - 50177 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Martin Diaz -**  **Nunez,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:23 - CR - 2198 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Jones, Dennis,** and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Martin Diaz - Nunez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, Diaz - Nunez challenges the application of the enhanced penalty range in § 1326(b) as unconstitutional because it permits a defendant to be sentenced above the statutory maximum of

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 27, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-50177 Document: 38-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2024No. 24 - 50177

2 § 1326(a) based on the fact of a prior conviction that was neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief correctly conceding that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez - Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553 - 54 (5th Cir. 2019). He raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review. Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Diaz - Nunez’s motion is **GRANTED** , and the district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 24-50177 Document: 38-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2024
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Aileen Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer of Uranerz Energy
Corporation. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      year ended December 31, 2005, and to which this certification is attached
      as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                

| | By:    | /s/ Aileen Lloyd     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | AILEEN LLOYD           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | April 12, 2006         

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The use of decoys to attract Least Terns (Sterna antillarum) to abandoned colony sites in New Jersey      

      January 1, 1984    

The number of Least Tern colony sites in New Jersey has declined in recent years.  Decoys were used at two recently abandoned Least Tern colony sites in New Jersey to encourage nesting.  The sites were chosen because of their apparent suitability as colony sites and the relative ease of protecting them from human disturbance and predators.  Least Terns were observed flying over and landing at both sites, although nesting occurred at only one site.  The effect of decoys was statically significant at the colony site used for nesting.  At this site, 44.5% of the landings occurred in the plot containing decoys and only 10.6% o the landings were in the control plot.  Nesting was initiated among the decoys.  These results indicate that decoys can be used to attract Least Terns to abandoned colony sites and may be useful for managing Least Terns and other colonial nesting birds.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - New Jersey

View All **
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Klaus Moeller, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant
to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

         (1) the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant
for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), to which this statement is
filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated:  November 19, 2003                 By:  /s/ Klaus Moeller
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Klaus Moeller
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Banco de Chile (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 27, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Fernando Cañas B.  
|                     |  |  |  | Fernando Cañas B.      
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 27, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Pedro Samhan E.    
|                     |  |  |  | Pedro Samhan E.        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Banco de Chile and will be retained by Banco de Chile and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020008EN.01000101.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9629 — Faurecia/SAS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 8/01)

On 6 January2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9629. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9629. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - (-)colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2022(1)

staff profileRoseann Gonzales-Schreiner

staff profileHeidi Koehler

Presentations and Events        March 21, 2017        Monitoring Land-Atmosphere Exchange of Moisture to Understand Drought
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert C. WILLIAMS

NO. 2017-K-1663

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-109291 and No. 333-111856) pertaining to the AMIS Holdings,
Inc.'s Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and Restated Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, respectively, of our reports dated February 24, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of AMIS Holdings, Inc., AMIS
Holdings, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of AMIS Holdings, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
March 8, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11351

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ENRIQUE GARCIA-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CR-35-ALL-C

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Enrique Garcia-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his

indictment. Garcia-Martinez maintains that he pleaded guilty to

an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-11351

-2-

§ 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year

maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that

offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Garcia-Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.