alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020314EN.01000201.xml

| 22.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9876 — TA Associates/Francisco Partners/Edifecs)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 314/02)

On 10 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9876. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9876. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        November 1, 2023        National- to continental-scale governmental geophysical efforts for critical mineral mapping, USA
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

ANTHONY LUCAS

NO. 2022 KW 0066

MARCH 28, 2022

In Re: Anthony Lucas, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 20- 

CR3- 14388. 

BEFORE: MCDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. The record of the Clerk of Court of Washington

Parish reflects the district court is proceeding toward

disposition of relator' s " Motion to Compel Identity of

Confidential Informant," as it is set to be heard on April 12, 

2022. 

JMM

WIL

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

4DP Tj CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Julius Russell KIRVEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2489

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave Climates

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(20)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(11)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 3, 2011        An Unseen World Beneath Our Feet - Caves, Sinkholes and Springs

Podcasts        February 11, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 112 - Landsat in Popular Media

Podcasts        April 21, 2008        Is there earthquake weather?

Podcasts        May 22, 2008        What's Killing Bats in the Northeast?
Gary MCCLOUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3715

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - (-)news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        September 2, 2015        What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard 

Satellite imagery        December 4, 2015        Titan Cassini VIMS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**DANIEL J. THOMAS**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§ 1350**

 

I, Daniel J. Thomas, of Concentra OperatingCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

March 25, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Awards and Facilities (A&F) hereby gives notice of the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

The A&F meeting session will be held on Tuesday, December 3, 2024. The open session will be from 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. The closed session will be from 3:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

# PLACE: 

The meetings will be held at NSF headquarters, 2145 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, and by videoconference.

# STATUS: 

One session is open, and one session is closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*A&F open session agenda:*                         Opening Remarks Regarding the Agenda; Discussion and Vote on Provisional Resolution related to Antarctic Science and Engineering Support Contract Update; Information Item: Indigenous Community Engagement.                    

*A&F closed session agenda:*                         Opening Remarks; Information Item: Annual Report of the Chief Officer for Research Facilities; Information Item: Briefing on U.S. Extremely Large Telescope Program Report from the External Panel.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Michelle McCrackin,                         *mmccrack@nsf.gov,*                         (703) 292-7000. Members of the public can observe the public portion of this meeting through a YouTube livestream, which may be found at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Ann E. Bushmiller,

Senior Legal Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2024-28265 Filed 11-27-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

faq        July 6, 2017        Could magnetic reversals be caused by meteorite or comet impacts?

Reference Materials        October 1, 2018        Report of the IAU Working Group
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MICHELE DIANE HOY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 216 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Agency

          - [No. 2009-N-10]

### Correction

In Notice document E9-18545 beginning on page 38618 in the issue of August 4, 2009, make the following correction:

                    On page 38618, the                     **DATES:**                     section should read: “Comments must be received on or before October 5, 2009.”                

[FR Doc. Z9-18545 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 10.2


July
10, 2007


Mr.
Eric G. Walters

Vice President & CFO
 CardioTech International, Inc.
 229 Andover Street
 Wilmington, MA  01887


Dear
Eric:


As
authorized by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, Base Salary
in Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement between CardioTech International,
Inc. and you, dated April 3, 2006, is hereby amended to be $195,000, effective
April 1, 2007.


Please
acknowledge your agreement with this amendment by signing below.


Sincerely,


/s/
Michael F. Adams


Michael
F. Adams

President & Chief Executive
Officer


I
acknowledge the above amendment.


	
  /s/ Eric G. Walters

  	
   

  
	
  Eric G. Walters
First Amendment to Mark Irion Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into and effective as of the 31st of January 2005, by and between NEFF CORP., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and MARK H. IRION, an individual (the “Executive” and collectively with the Company, the “Parties” or
individually, a “Party”). 
 Recitals 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2000 (the “Original Agreement”), where the Company and the Executive agreed to employ the Executive as
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to increase Executive’s Base
Salary, as defined in the Original Agreement, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 
 Terms and Conditions 
 1.
Revision to Base Salary. Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 3. Base Salary and Bonus. The Company agrees to pay or cause to be paid to the Executive during the term of this Agreement a base salary at the rate of $225,000 per annum, which rate shall be reviewed at least annually by the
Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) and may be changed in the Board’s discretion (hereinafter referred to as the “Base Salary”). Such Base Salary shall be payable in accordance with the Company’s customary
practices applicable to its senior executives. In addition to the Base Salary, Executive shall be eligible annually for the term of his employment under this Agreement to receive a cash bonus in the discretion of the Board. 
 2. Term. The Parties acknowledge that the initial term of the Original Agreement expired on February 28, 2003 and that the term of the
Original Agreement has been renewed annually. The Parties further acknowledge that the Original Agreement, as amended, will renew through February 28, 2006 if neither Party gives written notice to the other on or before September 1, 2005
that it intends not to extend the Original Agreement, as amended. 







 3. Ratification. As hereby amended, the Parties reaffirm the terms and conditions of the
Original Agreement. 
 4. Amendment. This Amendment may not be amended or modified, or any provision waived, unless in writing
and signed by the Parties. 
 5. Counterpart. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
be an original, but all of which together shall comprise one and the same instrument. 
 EXECUTED as of the date set forth in the
first paragraph of this Amendment. 
  

			
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/ Mark H. Irion
  

	Mark H. Irion
	
	NEFF CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Juan Carlos Mas
  

		 	Juan Carlos Mas, President and Chief Executive Officer


  

 2
**Rooms and Spaces Subcommittee Conference Call**  **- August 21, 2014** 

**Restrooms Scoping: where restrooms for the public are provided in a car, a restroom meeting the**  **following requirements shall be provided. A car with no public restrooms shall not be required to have an accessible**  **restroom . Accessible restrooms shall be**  **as close as practicable to seating spaces for persons using wheelchairs and mobility aids and shall be connected to**  **those spaces by a n**  **accessible on -**  **board circulation path. Technical R**  **equirements:**

 60” turning circle or T-turn  Allow side approach to toilet/water closet (WC)  Power door o Controls comply with Controls and Operating Mechanisms o controls 12” minimum from inside corner (does not apply to manual handle/latch for use when power fails)  Grab bars on side and behind water closet (use buildings and facilities requirements)  Grab bar along front of lavatory (may serve as WC side grab bar)  Fold - down grab bar permitted on open side of WC, provided it meets force requirements for folding/ deploying and does not intruded into requir e d clear floor space when deployed  Lavatory faucet controls (and soap dispenser, if provided) shall be proximity (e.g., infra red) activated **Single –** **level dining car**

 Table space for two wheelchairs, transfer seats for two (storage?)  Table top 34” max  29” min under table, extending 17” min back fro m seating position edge  32” min width **Sleeping compartment Scoping: a**  **t least on**  **e compartment in each sleeping car shall meet the technical requirements**  **below. Technical**  **requirements:**

 Side transfer to toilet, shower chair; meet requirements for restrooms above  60” turning circle in sleeping area with bed deployed Controls for all lights, HVAC, call button, etc., within reach ranges (allow duplicate controls)  Positive door latch, ope r able from outside by train personnel  Use VIA design as model  Bed at wheelchair seat height (18”?)  Table usable by wheelchair user: 34” max top height; 29” min under clearance to 17” from approach edge; 32” min width under approach edge **Lounge ca**  **r Scoping:**  **single -**  **level loun**  **ge cars shall comply with the following technical requirements. Bi**   ** level lounge cars shall comply on the lower level. Bi** **- level lounge cars shall have direct access**  **to station platforms on the lower level. Where vertical acces**  **s is provided, accessible seating spaces shall also be provided on the upper level. Where a bi**  **- level dining car is provided, an**  **accessible bi -**  **level lounge car shall be directly coupled to it. Technical requirements:** 

 Table space for 2, same as dining car  A ccessible restroom  Self- serve area meets ABA/ADA Guidelines for cafeteria  Vending machines meet ADA/ABA guidelines for controls and operating mechanisms
# C_2020419EN.01001201.xml

| 4.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10013 — Vestas/MHI Vestas JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 419/02)

On 27 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10013. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10013. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
STATE EX REL. Leroy JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1879

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.