alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The following comments are submitted by Georgia River Network regarding the water quality standards 

rulemaking that is currently under consideration by EPA. Georgia River Network is a statewide 

organization working to ensure a clean water legacy by engaging and empowering Georgians to protect 

and restore our rivers from the mountains to the coast, and representing over 30 water protection 

groups and 700 citizens in Georgia.

ANTIDEGRADATION

We support EPA’s proposal to clarify that antidegradation implementation procedures are part of the 

states’ water quality standards and hence subject to U.S. EPA review and approval/disapproval.

We support EPA’s proposal to specify that a state’s implementation procedures must include certain 

minimum elements. These minimum elements should include, among other things:

A process for ensuring existing uses are protected under Tier 1 protections. 

A method for reviewing all reasonable alternatives to a new or increased discharge as part of a Tier 2 

review and a requirement that discharge limits be set based on the least polluting, reasonable 

alternative. 

A description of the factors and process for determining if a new or increased discharge will 

accommodate “important” social or economic development. 

A description of the public notice and comment requirements. 

An explanation of both the process for designating and for protecting Tier 3 waters (also known as 

Outstanding National Resource Waters, Outstanding Resource Waters, or other state-specific names). 

We also suggest EPA require Tier 2 antidegradation protections be applied on a parameter-byparameter basis (rather than waterbody-by-waterbody).

DESIGNATED USES

We support U.S. EPA’s proposal to clarify that if a state or tribe removes a designated use (via a Use 

Attainability Analysis), that use should be replaced with the “highest attainable use” rather than 

allowing states to pick a much less protective use.

TRIENNIAL REVIEWS

We support U.S. EPA’s proposal to require states and tribes to solicit public comments to “scope” out 

the Triennial Review, rather than presenting the public with a shortened list of topics to respond to. We 

also support the proposal to require states and tribes to review their water quality criteria and ensure 

they are still protective of uses as part of the Review, and compare those criteria with U.S. EPA’s 

recommendations.

Thank you for consideration of these comments.

Sincerely,

April Ingle

Executive Director

April Ingle

Georgia River Network

Executive Director

126 South Milledge Ave., Suite E3

Athens, GA 30605

706-549-4508

http://www.garivers.org
Exhibit 99 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of Pinoak, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rick Jesky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Rick Jesky
----------------------------
    Rick Jesky
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    February 6, 2003

<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4834-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-4834-DR), dated October 11, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued November 4, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective November 2, 2024. 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-28678 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS 


Effective as of June 14, 2017


     Each non-employee director of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) shall receive: 


	
				
	 
	 
	 
	an annual retainer of $55,000 per year;

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	an annual grant of restricted stock having a value equal to $110,000;

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	a fee of $1,500 per day for each meeting of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) attended in person and $750 per day for each such meeting attended by phone; and

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	a fee of $1,500 per day for each committee meeting of the board of directors attended in person ($2,000 per day for each such audit committee meeting) and $750 per day for each such meeting attended by phone ($1,000 per day for each such audit committee meeting).






In addition, the Lead Independent Director and the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board shall each receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000, and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board and the Chairman of the Talent Development Committee of the Board shall each receive an additional annual retainer of $7,500, with all such amounts payable at the same time as the annual retainer. Each non-employee director may elect to receive shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company in lieu of any or all of his or her annual retainer, including any additional annual retainer for service as the Lead Independent Director or the Chairman of a committee. 


     The payment of annual retainers (including any additional annual retainers) and the annual grant of restricted stock shall be made each year on the date on which the Company holds its annual meeting of stockholders or such other date as the Board may determine. The number of shares of common stock to be received in the grant of restricted stock, as well as the number of shares of common stock to be received by any non-employee director electing to receive common stock in lieu of any or all of his or her payment of annual retainer (including any additional annual retainer), shall be based on the average of the closing prices per share of common stock for the 20 trading days prior to the date such grant and payments are made. 


     The Company shall reimburse all directors for travel and other disbursements relating to meetings of the Board and committees thereof, and non-employee directors shall be provided accident insurance with respect to Company-related business travel.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| Dated:  May 18, 2007 | s/George Suzuki                                              

George Suzuki, Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
H.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-82

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christopher DOUBLEDAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Total  Luxury  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sandy
J. Masselli, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                      /s/ SANDY J. MASSELLI, JR.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.

May 20, 2005
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(39)
              - multimedia_image-141771(36)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149198(9)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)hawaii(9)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

B-roll        May 19, 2017        Time-lapse sequence shows Halema‘uma‘u gas plume

B-roll        June 18, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Weak Plume at Halem`uma`u (webcam)

B-roll        June 9, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Ocean Entry and Laze

B-roll        May 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Active Ocean Entry

B-roll        June 15, 2018        Live stream camera captures subsidence at Halema‘uma‘u

B-roll        May 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Overflight of Fissure 20 Complex

B-roll        June 3, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Ocean Entry at Kapoho Bay

B-roll        May 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Aerial of Kīlauea Summit Activity

B-roll        July 1, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Collapse/Explosion Event at Halema‘uma‘u
Mackenley Widner FIACRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-2116

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 1, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 4, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm Appellant's judgments and sentences for first-degree murder and armed burglary. For the reasons discussed in his co-defendant's case, *Lai v. State* , No. 1D16-1882, 251 So.3d 333, 2018 WL 3638201(Fla. 1st DCA August 1, 2018), we reject Appellant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor's improper vouching of government *387witnesses. We decline to comment on Appellant's other claims.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wolf and Ray, JJ., concur.
# C_2020176EN.01000501.xml

| 26.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M. 9756 – Nouryon/CP Kelco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 176/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Nouryon Chemicals International B.V. (‘Nouryon’, the Netherlands), |
| --- | --- |

—

Nouryon Chemicals International B.V. (‘Nouryon’, the Netherlands),

| — | CP Kelco CMC (Denmark). |
| --- | --- |

—

CP Kelco CMC (Denmark).

Nouryon acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of CP Kelco CMC.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of equity and assets.

2.

| — | Nouryon: a global manufacturer and supplier of specialty chemicals company producing a wide range of chemicals such as salt, chlorine and caustic products; chemical intermediates, surfactants and processing chemicals and cellulose derivatives. It was formerly known as Akzo Nobel Specialty Chemicals and is solely controlled by funds managed by affiliates of the Carlyle group, |
| --- | --- |

—

Nouryon: a global manufacturer and supplier of specialty chemicals company producing a wide range of chemicals such as salt, chlorine and caustic products; chemical intermediates, surfactants and processing chemicals and cellulose derivatives. It was formerly known as Akzo Nobel Specialty Chemicals and is solely controlled by funds managed by affiliates of the Carlyle group,

| — | CP Kelco CMC: the carboxymethyl cellulose (‘CMC’) business of CP Kelco ApS and Huber. |
| --- | --- |

—

CP Kelco CMC: the carboxymethyl cellulose (‘CMC’) business of CP Kelco ApS and Huber.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

Case M.9756 – Nouryon/CP Kelco

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

slideshow        July 20, 2023        Planetary Science at the USGS

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
Willie Lee MCGEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-249

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Eric Daniel SPRUNGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2853

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARIUS DONNELL FREEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (5:13-cr-00080-RJC-DSC-1; 5:18-cv00013-RJC)

Submitted: October 18, 2018 Decided: October 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KEENAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darius Donnell Freeman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darius Donnell Freeman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims 

as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation 

marks omitted). “[I]f it appears from the record that the district court has not adjudicated 

all of the issues in a case, then there is no final order.” Id. (applying rule to habeas cases); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A) (permitting party to amend complaint once as matter of right 

before responsive pleading is served).

Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not rule on 

Freeman’s motion for leave to amend his § 2255 motion, which was docketed in his civil 

case, No. 5:18-cv-00013-RJC, prior to the entry of the district court’s order denying § 2255 

relief. Thus, the order Freeman seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See Porter, 803 F.3d at 696.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to 

the district court to consider Freeman’s motion for leave to amend. We deny Freeman’s 

motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5415 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

student loan payments made by an employer on behalf of an employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2016 

Ms. STEFANIK (for herself and Mr. MESSER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income student loan payments made by an 

employer on behalf of an employee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Employers 

5 Lessen Payments for Students Act of 2016’’ or the 

6 ‘‘HELPS Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER STUDENT LOAN PAY8 MENTS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 127(c)(1) of the Internal 

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5415 IH

1 the end of subparagraph (A), by redesignating subpara2 graph (B) as subparagraph (C), and by inserting after 

3 subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(B) the payment by an employer, on be5 half of an employee, of any indebtedness of the 

6 employee under a qualified education loan (as 

7 defined in section 221(d)(1)) or any interest re8 lating to such a loan (but only to the extent 

9 such payments for any taxable year do not ex10 ceed $10,000), and’’. 

11 (b) DENIAL OF DOUBLE BENEFIT.—Section 

12 221(e)(1) of such Code is amended by inserting before the 

13 period at the end the following: ‘‘, or for which an exclu14 sion is allowable under section 127’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to payments after December 31, 

17 2015. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, William W. Reid, Principal Executive Officer and I, Frank L. Jennings, Principal Financial Officer of Gold Resource Corporation (the “Company”) certify that:





1.  I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.





Date:  March 15, 2011








/s/ William W. Reid


William W. Reid


Principal Executive Officer








/s/ Frank L. Jennings


Frank L. Jennings


Principal Financial Officer