# + 2

(,1 1/,1(

Citation: 44 Fed. Reg. 49221 1979

Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Mar 22 07:33:15 2012

-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

## Tuesday August 21, 1979

- -



# Part V



# Environmental Protection Agency

Priority List and Additions

to the List of Categories of Stationary 

## Sources

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 49221 1979Federal Register / Vol. 44, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 21, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[FRL 1276-3]
Priority List and Additions to the List of Categories of Stationary Sources

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action contains EPA's promulgated listofmajor source categories for which standards of performance fornew stationary sources

are to be promulgated by August 1982. The Clean Air Act Amendments of1977 specify that the Administrator publish a list ofthe categories ofmajor stationary

sources which have not been previously listed as source categories forwhich standards ofperformance will be established. The promulgated list implements the Clean Air Actand reflects the Administrator's * determination that, based on preliminary assessments, emissions from the listed source categories contribute significantly to air pollution. The intended effect ofthis promulgation is to identify major source categories for which standards ofperformance are to be promulgated. The standards would apply only to new ormodified stationary sources-of air pollution.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 21, 1979. ADDRESSES: The background document for the promulgated priority list may be obtained from the U.S. EPA Library (MD-35), Research Triangle Park,North Carolina 27711, telephone number 919- 541-2777. Please refer to "Revised Prioritized List ofSource Categories for
New Source Performance Standards," EPA-450/3-79-023. The prioritization methodology is explained in the background document for the proposed priority list. This document, "Priorities for New Source Performance Standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977," EPA-450/3-78- 019, can also be obtained from the Research Triangle ParkEPA Library. Copies ofall comment letters received from interested persons participating in this rulemaking, a supmary ofthese comments, and a summary ofthe September 29, 1978, public hearing are available for inspection and copying during normal business hours at EPA's Public Information Reference Unit, Room 2922 (EPA Library), 401 M Street, SW,, Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. GaryD. McCutchen, Emission Standards and Engineering Division (MD-131, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,N.C. 27711, -telephone number (919) 541-5421.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 31, 1978 (43 FR 38872), EPA proposed a priority list ofmajor source catagories forwhich standards of performance would be promulgated by August 1982, and invited public
comment on the list and the methodology used to prioritize the

source categories. Promulgation ofthis list is required by section 111(f) ofthe Clean Air Act as amended August 7, 1977. The significant comments that

were received during the public
comment period, including those made
at a September 29,1978, public hearing, have been carefully reviewed and considered and,where determined by, ,the Administrator to be appropriate, changes have been included in this notice offinal rulemaking. Background

The program to establish standards of performance fornew stationary sources (also called New Source Performance Standards orNSPS) began on December 1970, when the Clean Air Act was signed into law.Authorized under section 111 ofthe Act, NSPS were to require the best control system (considering cost) for new facilities, and

were intended to complement the other air quality management approaches authorized by the 1970Act. A total Of27

source categories are regulated by NSPS, with NSPS for an additional 25

source categories under development.

During the 1977hearings on the Clean AirAct, Congress received testimony on the need for more rapid development of NSPS. There was concern that not all

sources which had the potential to endanger public health or welfare were controlled by NSPS and that the potential existedfor "environmental blackmail" from source categories not subject to NSPS. These concerns Were reflected in the Clean Air Act Amendments of1977, specifically in section 111(f).

. Section 111(f) requires that the Administrator publish a list ofmajor stationary sources of air pollution not listed, as ofAugust 7, 1977, under section 111(b)(1)(A), which in effect meant those sources forwhich NSPS hadnot yetbeen proposed or promulgated. Before promulgating this list, the Administrator was to provide notice ofand opportunity for a public hearing and consult with Governors and State airpollution control agencies. In developing priorities, section 111(f) specifies that the Administrator consider (1)the quantity ofemissions from each source category, (2) the extent to which each pollutant endangers public health or welfare, and (3)the mobility and competitive nature of each stationary source category, e.g., the capability ofa new or existing source to locate in areas with less stringent air pollution control regulations. Governors may at any time submit applications under section 111(j) to add major source categories to the list, add any source category to the listwhich may endanger public health or welfare, change the priority ranking, or revise promulgated NSPS. Development of the Priority List

Development ofthe priority list was initiated by compiling data on a large number of source categories from literature resources. The data were first analyzed to determine major source categories, those categories for which an average size planthas the potential to emit 100 tons ormore per year ofany
one pollutant. These major source categories were then subjected to a priority ranking procedure using the three criteria specified in section 111(o ofthe Act.

The procedure used first ranks source categories on a pollutant by pollutant basis. This resulted in nine lists (one for each pollutant-volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, lead, fluorides, acid mist, and hydrogen sulfide) with each list ranked using the criteria in the Act, In this ranking, first priority was given to quantity ofemissions, second priority to potential impact on health or welfare, and third priority to mobility. Thus,

sources with the greatest growth rates and emission reduction potential were high on each list; sources with limited choice oflocation, low growth and small emission reduction potential were low

on each list.

The nine lists were combined Into one. by selecting pollutant goals-a procedure which, in effect, assigned a relative priority to pollutants based upon the potential impact ofNSPS. After thepollutant goals were selected, the final priority list was established through the selection ofsource categories which have maximum impact

on attafining the selected goals. The effect ofthis procedure was to emphasize control ofall criteria pollutants except carbon monoxide and to give carbon monoxide and noncriteria pollutants a lower priority. 49222.

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 49222 1979Federal Register 

## 1 Vol. 44, N6. 163 /'Tuesday, August 21, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

In the background reports and in the preamble to the proposed priority list, the term "hydrocarbon" was used even though the emissions referred to were VOC which, unlikehydrocarbon compounds, can contain elements other than carbon and hydrogen. A VOCis defined byEPA as any organic compound that,when released to the atmosphere, can remain long enough to participate in photochemical reactions. Since VOC contribute to ambient levels ofphotochemical oxidants, they are considered a criteria pollutant.

The ranking of source categories on the listand the differentiation between major andminor sources was sensitive
to the accuracy ofthe datautilized. The data base used to establish the-priority listwas obtained from a number of literature sources including EPA screening studies.However, screening studies were not available for all source categories. Therefore, ifnew information becomes available afterpromulgation of the list, the Administratormay delete from or add to the listin response to this

new information.

Additional detail on the prioritization methodology, the input factors used, and the ranking ofindividual source categories is available in the two background documents (see "ADDRESSES"). Significance ofPriority List

The promulgated list is essentially an advance notice offuture standard development activity. Itidentifies major

source categories and the approximate order in which NSPS development would be initiated. However, iffurther study indicates thatan NSPS would have little orno effect on emissions, or that an NSPS would be impractical, a
source category would be given alower priority or removed from-the list. Similarly, new information may increase thepriority ofa source category. The Administrator may also concurrently develop standards for sources which are not on the priority list,especially certain "minor" sources which, in aggregate, represent alarge quantity ofemissions.

The distinction between major and minor source categories is defined only for the purpose ofdetermining NSPS priorities and should notbe used to, determine sources subject to New Source Review, which is conducted on a case-by-case basis. Moreover, some New Source Reviewprograms, such as prevention of significant deterioration, have separate and distinct criteria for defining amajor source (e.g., 100 tons per year potential for certain source types and 250 tons peryear for others). Identification of Source Categories

Two groups ofsources in addition to minor sources are not included on the promulgated list. One group includes

sources which could notbe evaluated due to insufficient information. This lack of data suggests that these sources, which are identified in the background report,"Priorities forNSPS under the Clean Air Act of1977," have not previously been regulated orstudied and, therefore, are probably not major

sources. Nevertheless, the Administrator will continue to investigate these

sources and will consider development ofNSPS forany which are identified as being significant sources ofair pollution.

The second group ofsource categories
not on the priority list consists ofthose listed under section 111(b](1)(A) on or before August 7,1977. These are: Fossil-fuel-fired steam generators Incinerators Portland Cement Plants -NitricAcid Plants Sulfuric Acid Plants Asphalt Concrete Plants Petroleum Refineries StorageVessels forPetroleum Liquids Secondary LeadSmelters Secondary Brass and Bronze Ingot Production

Plants Iron and Steel Plants Sewage Treatment Plants Primary Copper Smelters Primary Zinc Smelters Primary Lead Smelters Primary AluminumReduction Plants PhosphateFertilizer Industry-WetProcess

Phosphoric Acid Plants Phosphate Fertilizer Industry.

Superphosphoric Acid Plants Phosphate Fertilizer Industry:Diammonlum

Phosphate Plants Phosphate Fertilizer Industry:Triple

Superphosphate Plants Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Cranular Triple

Superphosphate StorageFacilities Coal Preparation Plants Ferroalloy Production Facilities Steel Plants:Electric ArcFurnaces Kraft PulpM4ills

- Lime Plants GrainElevators

There are, however, some facilities (or subcategories) within these source categories for which NSPS have not been developed, butwhich mayby themselves be significant sources ofair pollution.A number of these facilities

were evaluated as ifthey were separate source-categories; three whichrank high in priority are included on the promulgated list to indicate that the Administrator plans to develop standards forthem: Petroleum refinery fugitivi emissions, industrial fossil-fuelfired steamgenerators, and nonmunicipal incinerators. In addition to these, the Administrator will continue to evaluate affected facilities withinlisted

source categories and may from time to time develop NSPS for such facilities. The iron and steel industry provides an example ofa category which is already listed (so does not appear on thepriority list), but in which an active interest remains. Although the growth rate for

new sintering capacity is presently very low, the Administrator is continuing to
assess emission control and
measurement technology with aview toward possible development ofan NSPS for sintering plants at a later date. A project is also underway toupdate emission factors forall steelmaking
processes, including fugitive emissions, in an effort to determine the relative significance ofemissions from each process. In addition, byproduct coke
ovens,nearly always associated with steelmills, are included on thepriority listand areundergoing standard development studies.

There are some differences between the format ofthe list in the background report, "Revised Prioritized List of Source Categories forNSPS Promulgation" 9nd the format ofthe list which appears here. These differences

are primarily a result ofaggregation of subcategories which had been subdivided for size classification and priority ranking analysis. Non-metallic mineral processing, for example, had been subdivided intonine subcategories forprioritization, eight ofwhich were analyzed separately (stone, sand and gravel, clay, gypsumlime, borax, fluorspar,and phosphate rock mining) and one ofwhich is considered a minor

source (mica mining). EPA plans to study the entire non-metallic mineral processing industry at one time, since many ofthe processes and control techniques are similar.Forthis reason, the industry is identified by a single aggregated listing. This does not necessarily imply that a single standard would apply to all sources within the listed category. Rather, as described below in the case of the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry, the nature and scope of standards willbe determined only after

a detailed study ofsources within the category.

In addition to the major sources, three

source categories not identified as being major source categories have been added to the list: organic solvent cleaning, industrial surface coating of metal furniture, and lead acidbattery manufacture.

Organic solvent cleaning was chosen for study because this source category accounts for some 5percent of stationary source VOC emissions in a 49223

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 49223 197949224 Federal Register / Vol. 44, No. 163 

## / Tuesday, August 21, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

typical air quality control region. Thus,. although individual facilities typically emit less than 100 tonsper year,this is a significant source ofVOC emissions and the Administrator considers it prudent to continue the development ofa standard for this source category.

The metal furniture coating industry is also a significant source of VOC emissions, and there are over 300 existing facilities with the potential to emit more than 100 tbns per year.

Lead acid battery manufacture is a significant source oflead emissions. An NSPS forthis source category is expected to assist in attainment ofthe National Ambient Air Quality Standard for lead.

Stationary gas turbines are included

on this list because this source category had notbeen listed by August 7,1977, when the Clean Air Act Amendments

were enacted. However,this source category has not been prioritized, since it was listed under section 111(b)(1)(A) and NSPS were proposed October 3, 1977.

One listed source category which deserves special attention is the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry (SOCM1). Preliminary estimates indicate thatthere may be over 600 differentprocesses included in this source category, but only 27 of these processes have been evaluated. For the others, there-was not enough information available. As isthe

case with several other aggregated

source categories, generic standards will be usedto cover as many ofthe sources
as possible, so separate NSPS for each ofthe 600 processes are unlikely.

Based on an effort which has been underway within EPA for two years to study this complex source category, the

. generic standards could regulate -nearly all emissions by covering four broad

areas: Process facilities, storage facilities, leakage, and transport and handling losses. Also, since a number of the pollutants emitted arepotentially toxic or carcinogenic, regulation under, section 112, National Emission Standards forHazardous AirPollutants (NESHAP), rather than NSPS may be

more appropriated. Therefore; SOCMI is listed as a single source category. The 27 processes considered the most likely candidates forNSPS orNESHAP coverage through generic standards are listed in the preamble to the proposed priority list and discusspd in the background documents.

Additional information has resulted-in the exclusion from the listof some
source categories which are shown in the background reports. Mixed fuel boilers and feed and grainmilling are regulated by the NSPS for fossil-fuel
steam generators and grain elevators, respectively. Beer manufacture has a much lower emission level than had been assumed in thebackground report, and whiskey manufacture was deleted due to a lack ofany demonstrated control technology.

Public Participation

-The Clean Air Actrequires that the Administrator,prior to promulgating this listof source categories, consult with Governors and State air pollution control agencies. An invitation was extended on February 28,1978, to the State and Territorial AirPollution Program Administrators (STAPPA) and the National Governors' Association. (NGA) to attend the first Working Group meeting, March 16, 1978, and review the draft background report and the methods used to apply the priority criteria. On March 24,1978, each Governor and the director of each State air pollution control agency was notified byletter ofthis project, including an invitation to participate or comment: (1] At the April 5-6,1978, National Air Pollution ControlTechniques Advisory Committee (NAPCTAC) meeting in Alexandria, Virinia;

(2) When the final background report

wasmailed to them;

(3) When the list was proposed in the Federal Register, or

(4)At apublic hearing to be held on theproposed list.The draft background report for the proposed listwas mailed to all NAPCTAC members, five ofwhich represent State or-local agencies, two of which represent environmental groups, and eight ofwhich represent industry. Copies were mailed to six environmental groups and three

consumer groups at the same time, and to a representative ofthe NGA. Copies of the final background report for the proposed list were sent to the Governors, State and local air pollution control agencies, NAPCTAC members, environmental groups, the NGA, and other requesters inJuly 1978.

Thepublic comment period on the proposed list,published in the-August 31, 1978, Federal Register, extended through October 30, 1978. There were 18 comment letters received, 10 from industry and 8from various regulatory agencies. Several comments resultedin changes to the proposed priority list.

-Apublic hearing was held on September 29; 1978, to discuss the proposed priority listin accordance with section 111(g)(8) ofthe CleanAirAct. There were no written comments and only one verbal statement resulting from the public hearing. Significant Comments and Changes to the Proposed Priority List

As a result ofpublic comments and the availability ofnew screening studies and reports, 34 major and 11 minor

source category data sets were reevaluated. This reexamination resulted in data changes for29 major and9 minor source categories.

Ten source categories have been removed from the proposed priority list. Eight ofthese source category deletions

are a result ofnew data indicating that NSPS would have little orno effect. These source categories are: Varnish, carbon black, explosives, acid sulfite wood pulping, NSSC wood pulping, gasoline additives manufacturing, alfalfa dehydrating, and hydrofluoric acid manufacturing. Printing ink manufacturing wasreclassified from a major to a minor source category. In addition, two source categories, gray iron and steel foundries, were combined

- into one source category. Finally, fuel

conversion wasremoved from the list due to uncertainties regarding the approach and scheduled involved in developing environmental standards for the various processes. Likely candidates for NSPS include coal gasification (both low and high pressure), coal liquefaction, and oil shale and tar sand processing. These actions reduce the final prioritylist to 59 source cuategorles.

Themost significant comments and changes made to the proposed regulations are discussed below:

1. Definitionof "Mobility."Several commenters felt that the treatment of

source category mobility (movability)

was too broad. Mobility In the prioritization analysis refers to the feasibility a stationary source has to relocate to, orlocate new facilities In,

areas with less stringent air pollution control regulations. Non-movable stationary source categories were identified on the basis ofbeing firmly tied either to the market (e.g., dry cleaners) or to a supply ofmaterials (e.g., mining operations). The Administrator recognizes that there are many other factors which would be considered in plant siting situations, but considers the approach used In determining the priority list sufficient foir the purposes ofthis study.

2. SourceCategory Aggregation, Several commenters indicated that there

were discrepancies between the source categories named in the priority list and those in the background document. The differences between the priority listing in the Federal Register and the background document list is a result of aggregation ofsources which hadbeen

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 49224 1979Federal Register / Vol. 44, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 21, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

subcategorized for size classification andpriority ranking analysis in the background document. Aggregation indicates that all source categories under a generic industry heading, such

as non-metallic mineralprocessing, will be evaluated at the same time, although this does not necessarily imply that a single standard would apply to all

sources within the listed category.

3. Control Costs.Two commenters felt that the cost ofpollution control to meet NSPS limitations should have been included in the criteria for prioritization. The CleanAir Actpriority listcriteria do not include the cost ofpollution control, butpollution control costs were considered during the determination of control technology assumed for the priority liststudy. Control costs are examined in more detail during NSPS development studies for each source category, andmust be considered in determining each NSPS.

4.MinorSource Categories. One
commenter felt that the Administrator lacks statutory authority to make a policy decision to develop NSPS for a minor source category until after the major sources have been dealt with, since Congress indicated major sources mustbe givenpriority. The Administrator, in promulgating thislist, is placing an almost exclusive emphasis

on NSPS formajor source categories. However,the Clean Air Act does not prohibit concurrent promulgation of NSPS forminor, but significant, source categories. For the threeminor source categories listed in this regulation, NSPS development had been initiated before the priority listwas available, and completion ofstandards development forthese sources is considered justified.

5. Stationary FuelCombustion/Waste Incineration. Two State agencies felt that stationary fuel combustion and
waste incineration should have a high prioritybecause ofsource activity growth in theirrespective States. Inthe promulgated list,both ofthese source categories aregiven higrprioritybased

on the most recent growth rates available. Given the concern expressed by these agencies, the Administrator has already initiated standard development studies forthese source categories.

6. Chemical Products Manufacture! FuelConversion.One commenter felt that the growthrate and, therefore, the need forcoal gasification plant NSPS is overestimated. High Btu coal gasification was reexamined; although

no commercial-scale plants currently exist in this country, environmental
programs need to keep pace with the emphasis on energy programs. The fuel conversion processes have been removed from the priority listfor special study.

7. Chemical Products Manufacture/ Printing InkManufacture. One
commenter indicated that neither existing conditions within the printing inkindustry nor projections offuture growth ofthe industryjustify its categorization as a major source. The 

### Administrator has examined the new data provided, and has reclassified 

### printing ink manufacturing plants as a minorsource category. As was discussed earlier, however, the Administrator may still develop standards for "minor" source categories, especially those which, in aggregate, represent a significant quantity of emissions.

8. WoodProcessing/NSSC ndAcid SulfitePulping.One commenter indicated that acid sulfite pulp production is a declining growth industry and therefore shouldnot be included in thepriority list.The Administrator agrees withthis comment, based on examination ofacid sulfite pulpproduction projections in a

new screening study. In addition, the screening study indicates thatNSSC pulping is, in effect, controlled bythe promulgated NSPS for Kraftpulp mills, resulting in little orno further emission reduction frompromulgation ofan NSSC NSPS. Therefore, both acid sulfite and NSSC pulping have been removed from the list. Development ofStandards

The Administrator has.undertaken a program to promulgate NSPS for the

source categories on this priority listby August 7,1982. Development of standards has already been initiated for nearly two-thirds ofthe source categories listed; work on the remaining

source categories will be initiated within 

### the next year.

The priorityranking is indicated by the number to the left ofeach source category and willbe used to decide the ,order in which new projects are initiated, although thisis not necessarily

an indication ofthe order in which projects willbe completed. Infact, higher priority source categories often present difficult technical and regulatory problems, and maybe among the later

source categories forwhich standards

are promulgated.

It shouldbe pointed out that several ofthe source categories listed couldbe subject to standards which may be adopted under section 112 of the Clean Air Act,national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP). Included are byproduct coke ovens and several source categories within the petroleum transport and marketing industry. Ifstandards are developed under section 112 forthese or any other

source categories on thepromulgated list, then standards may notbe developed for those source categories under section 111.

Promulgation ofthislist not only fulfills the section 111(f) requirements concerning establishment ofpriorities, but also constitutes notice that all

source categories on the prioritylist 

### are considered significant sources ofair pollution and are hereby listed in accordance with section 111(b)(1)(A). It should be noted, however, thatthe

source categories identified on this priority list, even though listedin accordance with section 111(b)(1)(A),

arenot subject to the provisions ofsection 111(b](1)(B], which would require proposal ofan NSPS for each listed source category within 120 days of adoption ofthe list.Rather, the promulgation ofstandards for sources contained on thispriority list willbe undertaken in accordance withthe time schedule prescribed in section 111(f)(1) ofthe Clean AirAct Amendments. That Is, NSPS for 25 percent ofthese source categories are tobe promulgated by August 1980, 75 percentby August 1981, and all oftheNSPS by August1982.

Dated: August 15,1979. DouglasM.Costle, Administrotor.

Part 60 ofChapter I ofTitle 40 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations is amended by adding § 60.16 to Subpart A as follows:
§ 60.16 Prioritylist
Prioritized Major Source Categories

rority Number"

SourceCotegory 1.Synthetic Organic ChemicalManufacturing

(a) Unitprocesses (b) Storage andhandling equipment (c)Fugitive emission sources (d)Secondary sources 2.Industrial Surface Coating: Cans 3.Petroleum Refineries: Fugitive Sources 4. Industrial Surface Coating-Paper 5.DryCleaning

(a]Perchloroethylene (b)Petroleum solvent &Graphic Arts 7.Polymers and Resins: AcrylicResins 8.

Mineral Wool 9.Stationary Internal CombustionEngines 10.Industrial Surface Coating:Fabric 11. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators: Industrial Boilers 12. Incineration Non-Municipal 13. Non-Metallic MineralProcessing

- 14.Metallic Mineral Processing

"Low n-mbers have highestpriority; e.g.. No.i s high priority.No. 59Islow priority. 

### 49225

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 49225 197949226 Federal Register / Vol.

15. Secondary Copper 16. Phosphate Rock Preparation 17. Foundries. Steel and GrayIron 18. Polymers and Resins: Polyethylene 19. Charcoal Production 20. Synthetic Rubber

(a)Tire manufacture (b) SBR production 21. Vegetable Oil 22. Industrial Surface Coating: Metal Coil 23. Petroleum Transportation and Marketing 24.By-Product Coke Ovens 25. Synthetic Fibers 26. Plywood Manufacture 27.Industrial Surface Coating: Automobiles 28.Industrial Surface Coating: Large Appliances 29. Crude Oil and Natural GasProduction 30.Secondary Aluminum 31. Potash 32. Sintering: Clay and Fly Ash 33. Glass 34. Gypsum 35. Sodium Carbonate 36. Secondary Zinc 37. Polymers and Resins: Phenolic 38. Polymers and Resins: Urea-Melamfne 39. Ammonia 40. Polymers and Resins: Polystyrene 41. Polymers and Resins: ABS-SANResins 42. Fiberglass 43. Polymers and Resins: Polypropylene 44. Textile Processing 45. Asphalt Roofing Plants 46.Brick and Related Clay Products 47. Ceramic Clay Manufacturing 48. Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer 49. Castable Refractories 50. Borax and Boric Acid 51. Polymers and Resins: Polyester Resins 52. Ammonium Sulfate 53. Starch 54. Perlite 55. Phosphoric Acid: Thermal Process 56.Uranium Refining 57.Animal Feed Defluorination 58. Urea (forfertilizer and polymers) 59. Detergent

Other Source Categories
Lead acid battery manufacture*- Organic solvent cleaning* Industrial surface coating:metal firniture** Stationary gas turbines* *

(Sec. 111, 301(a). Clean Air Act as amended (42 U.S.C. 7411, 7601))

[FR Doc.79-25656 Filed 8-20-79: 6:45 aml

BILLING CODE 6560-01-M

"*

Minor source category, but included on list since an NSPS is being developed for that source category.

*** Not prioritized, since an NSPS forthis major

source category has already been proposed. 

### 44, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 21, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 49226 1979