alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021395EN.01011501.xml

| 29.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/115 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/115

---

P9_TA(2020)0247

Dock dues extension in the French outermost regions *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 October 2020 on the proposal for a Council decision amending the period of application of Decision No 940/2014/EU concerning the dock dues in the French outermost regions (COM(2020)0371 — C9-0281/2020 — 2020/0174(CNS))

(Special legislative procedure — consultation)

(2021/C 395/19)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2020)0371), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2020)0371),

| — | having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0281/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0281/2020),

| — | having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A9-0159/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development (A9-0159/2020),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

4.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31046 Conference Calendar

ROLANDO ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RONNIE BOOK; PETE TOLAR; BOOKER, Captain; JOHN DOE, 1-5; JOHN DOE, 1-2, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-1057

-------------------- February 21, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rolando Alexander, INS detainee #A21156111, appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Alexander’s appellate brief does not address the issue of exhaustion, which was the basis of the district court’s dismissal. He has thus abandoned the issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).No. 01-31046 -2- Because Alexander fails to address the only issue on appeal, his appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. His motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Jarmeel Earl BENNETT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1208

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Simone B. GUILLORY, et al. v. Samuel S. BROUSSARD, Jr., et al.

NO. 2018-C-0628

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

CLARK, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Piet Boersma, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of VIA NET.WORKS, Inc.(“VIA”);

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for VIA and have:

 

a)                                      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to VIA, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluatedthe effectiveness of VIA’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c)                                      disclosedin this report any change in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) thatoccurred during VIA’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, VIA’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to VIA’s auditors andthe audit committee of VIA’s board of directors:

 

a)                                      allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect VIA’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)                                     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  June 2, 2005    |
|-----------------------------|
| /S/ PIET BOERSMA            |   |
| Piet Boersma                |
| Principal financial officer |

 

----
PENTHOUSE 68, LLC, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - (-)montana(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

Photography        July 16, 2020        Comet NEOWISE and the Roosevelt Arch at Yellowstone National Park

publication        March 6, 1952        Preliminary report on the Comet area, Jefferson County, Montana
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kendall Cowan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.






August 14, 2002              /s/ Kendall Cowan
------------------           -----------------------------
Date                         Kendall Cowan
                             Chief Financial Officer






This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the quarterly  report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
the  undersigned,  in the capacity  and on the date  indicated  below,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 22, 2005                   s/George Suzuki
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          George Suzuki, Chief Executive Officer
Dudley LEWIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 2-INFINITY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         405,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (13,378)
<INVENTORY>                                    199,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               805,259
<PP&E>                                         666,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                (56,971)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,799,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,151,386
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,900,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,251,543)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (1,251,543)
<SALES>                                      1,555,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,555,286
<CGS>                                        1,188,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,188,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,317,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             277,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,116,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,116,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,116,007)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Center News        June 21, 2022        Past and Future Celebrations of Carolyn Shoemaker's Life and Legacy

Reference Materials        October 1, 2018        Report of the IAU Working Group
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with this Annual
Report of Wizard World, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Macaluso, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 20, 2012 | By: | /s/ John Macaluso          
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                     |     | John Macaluso              
|                     |     | Principal Financial Officer
|                     |     | Wizard World, Inc.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5452 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

individuals eligible for Indian Health Service assistance 

to qualify for health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5452 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American 

3 Health Savings Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR INDIAN HEALTH SERV5 ICE ASSISTANCE NOT DISQUALIFIED FROM 

6 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS EL11 IGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER INDIAN

12 HEALTH SERVICE PROGRAMS.—For purposes of 

13 subparagraph (A)(ii), an individual shall not be 

14 treated as covered under a health plan de15 scribed in such subparagraph merely because 

16 the individual receives hospital care or medical 

17 services under a medical care program of the 

18 Indian Health Service or of a tribal organiza19 tion.’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5452 RFS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2016. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
          99.2**
 
 CERTIFICATE
          PURSUANT TO
 18
          U.S.C.
          SECTION 1350
 AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
          connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB/A of Henley
          Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sam
          Hirji,
          Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
          U.S.C.
          Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of
          2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.
                The
                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
                    or 15 (d) of
                    the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                    and
 
 2.
                The
                    information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
                    material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
                    the
                    Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
          October 30, 2006
 
 SAM
          HIRJI
 Sam
          Hirji
 Chief
          Executive Officer,
 President
          and Director








-1-
STATEMENT OF PAST DUE SUPPORT OWED FOR CHILD SUPPORT

Bankruptcy was filed on April 30, 2021. The most recent Order entered in this case required a payment 

for child support of $499.92 per month. There was $900.00 in arrears due at the time that the Child 

Support Order was established. The first payment of child support was due on November 15, 2019 and 

lasts for 42 months until May 15, 2023. 

Under penalty of perjury, I Efrain Navarette declare the facts stated in this statement of Past-Due 

Support Owed for Child Support and Alimony are true. 

Signature: _______________________ Date: ______________________

Due Paid Due Paid Due Paid

January 499.92 1,059.84 499.92 1,059.84 

February 499.92 - 499.92 1,059.84 

March 499.92 - 499.92 529.92 

April 400.00 499.92 1,059.84 499.92 529.92 

May 493.00 499.92 - 

June 493.00 499.92 - 

July 493.00 499.92 1,059.84 

August 493.00 499.92 - 

September 493.00 499.92 529.92 

October 493.00 499.92 1,059.84 

November 499.92 529.92 499.92 - 

December 499.92 529.92 499.92 1,029.92 

Subtotal 999.84 4,417.84 5,999.04 5,799.20 1,999.68 3,179.52 

Total due $ 8,998.56 Total paid $ 13,396.56 Total amount owed $ (4,398.00)

Statement of past due support owed for alimony

Due Paid Due Paid Due Paid

January 875.00 875.00 875.00 - 

February 875.00 - 875.00 100.00 

March 875.00 - 875.00 - 

April 875.00 - 875.00 - 

May 875.00 - 100.00 

June 875.00 - 500.00 

July 875.00 - 

August 875.00 - 

September 300.00 875.00 - 

October 875.00 - 

November 875.00 875.00 875.00 - 

December 875.00 875.00 875.00 - 

Subtotal 1,750.00 2,050.00 10,500.00 875.00 3,500.00 700.00 

Total due $ 15,750.00 Total paid $ 3,625.00 Total amount owed $ 12,125.00

Total Alimony owed: $ 12,125.00 Total Child Support owed: $ (4,398.00)

Total owed: $ 7,727.00 Plus total arrears owed: $ 900.00

Total amount owed: $ 8,627.00

Year 2019 Year 2020 Year 2021

Year 2019 Year 2020 Year 2021

Case 21-14282-SMG Doc 20-1 Filed 07/15/21 Page 1 of 1
Christopher Lamont ALTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0843

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 5, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to *Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the Appellant only admitted violating the conditions of probation as alleged in grounds I through X of the fourth amended affidavit of violation of probation. *See**Margolis v. State* , 148 So.3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming revocation of probation and resulting sentence, but remanding for entry of corrected revocation order of listing only the conditions of probation to which the defendant admitted); *Narvaez v. State* , 674 So.2d 868, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation must comport with oral pronouncement, and remanding with instructions to strike from the order violations neither admitted to nor found by the court). Appellant need not be present for this correction.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Osterhaus and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
# Ty **pical Composition of Cashew Nutshell Liquid**  Constituent Group Substance Name CAS Number Molecular

Form ula Structural Formula Typical % **Low boilers (C**  **11 /C**  **13 and**  **unidentified phenolics)**  C 11 & C 13 phenolic species and

unidentified phenols (tridecylphenol homologue

diene) NI See below 2.8 Meta - undecylphenol (or 3 - undecylphenol) NI C 17 H 28 O 0.27
Meta -tridecylphenol (or 3 - tridecylphenol) NI C 19 H 32 O 2.53
**Main component**  Cardanol / 3 - [(E) - pentadec- 8 -

enyl]phenol (including saturated side chain, monoene, diene and triene) 37330 - 39 - 5 See below 63.44 Meta - pentadecylphenol (or 3 - pentadecylphenol or Cardanol, saturated side

chain) 37330 - 39 - 5 C 21 H 36 O 9.91 Meta - pentadecenylphenol (or 3 - metapentadecenyl phenol or Cardanol, monoene) 37330 - 39 - 5 C 21 H 34 O 50.9Meta - pentadecatrienylphenol, (or 3 - meta - pentadecatrienyl phenol or Cardanol, triene) 37330 - 39 - 5 C 21 H 30 O
2.63

**C 17**  **phenolics** C 17 phenolic species (hepta

decyl homologue triene) NI See below 1.84 Meta - heptadecenylphenol (or 3 - heptadecenylphenol) NI C 23 H 38 O
1.38

Meta - heptadecadienylphenol (or 3 - heptadecadienylphenol) NI C 23 H 36 O
0.18

Meta - heptadecatrienylphenol (or 3 - heptadecatrienylphenol) NI C 23 H 34 O 0.28 This image cannot currently be displayed.

This image cannot currently be displayed.

This image cannot currently be displayed.

This image cannot currently be displayed.**High boilers** 5 - pentadecyl - resorcinol / 5 - pentadecylbenzene - 1,3 - diol 3158 - 56 - 3 See below 3.92 5- pentadecadienylresorcinol (or 1,3 -dihydroxy- 5 - pentadecadienylbenzene or

Cardol) 3158 - 56 - 3 C 21 H 32 O 2 1.43

5- pentadecatrienylresorcinol (or 1,3 -dihydroxy- 5 - pentadecatrienylbenzene or

Cardol) 3158 - 56 - 3 C 21 H 30 O 2
1.86 This image cannot currently be displayed.

This image cannot currently be displayed.

This image cannot currently be displayed.2 - methyl - 5- pentadecadienylresorcinol (or 1,3 - dihydroxy- 2-methyl5 - pentadecadienylbenzene or 2 - Methyl cardol) 57485 - 99 - 1 C 21 H 32 O 2
0.22

2-methyl-5- pentadecatrienylresorcinol (or 1,3 -dihydroxy- 2-methyl5 - pentadecatrienylbenzene or 2 - Methyl cardol) 57485 - 99 - 1 C 22 H 3 4 O 2
0.41
**Poly meric**  **constituents Poly** **meric constituents** N/A N/A - 28.00 **Notes:** NI = No information, N/A = Not app licable This image cannot currently be displayed.

This image cannot currently be displayed.