alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020436EN.01000201.xml

| 17.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10005 — CPPIB/Sixth Street/Clara)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 436/02)

On 11 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mihir K. Taneja,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GeoPharma, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                         |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mihir K. Taneja    
|                         |  |     |  | Mihir K. Taneja        
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



25
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In Re: Vanessa Chiu Bankruptcy No.: 21-21661-RAM

Chapter 13

Debtor(s).

______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS FOR 

VIOLATIONS OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. SECTIONS 

105(A) AND 362(K) AGAINST MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

This action having come before this Court on March 8, 2022, at 9:00 AM upon the 

Debtor’s Motion for Contempt and Sanctions Against Memorial Healthcare System [ECF#24; 

herein “Motion”], noting that service upon Memorial Healthcare System (herein “Creditor”) was 

proper, and the Court having heard the unopposed argument of Debtor’s counsel, 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. The Court finds that the Creditor violated the Automatic Stay by continuing post-petition 

collection efforts against the Debtor. 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 9, 2022.

Case 21-21661-RAM Doc 31 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 2
3. The Creditor shall cease all communication and collection efforts with the Debtor.

4. For the presentment and prosecution of the Motion, the Creditor shall pay the Debtor’s 

reasonable and fully earned attorney’s fees of $2,677.50 as well as actual costs of $36.65 

for a total sanction of $2,714.15. 

5. The Creditor shall make payment addressed to Jose A. Blanco, P.A., operating account, 

and directly payable to Debtor’s attorney’s firm at: 

Jose A. Blanco, P.A.

102 E 49th ST

Hialeah, FL 33013

6. Payment shall be received by the Debtor’s attorney within 21 days of the entry of this 

instant Order. 

7. The failure to cease communication and collection efforts or the failure to timely pay the 

above-ordered sanction, may lead to the imposition of further sanctions and potentially 

punitive sanctions. 

8. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this Order to enforce the terms of this Order. 

# # #

Attorney Jose A. Blanco, Esq. is hereby directed to serve a copy of this order upon all interested parties.

Respectfully Submitted By: 

Jose A. Blanco, Esq. FBN: 062449

Jose A. Blanco, P.A.

Attorney for Debtor(s)

102 E 49th ST

Hialeah, FL 33013,

Tel. (305) 349-3463

Fax: (786) 567-5057

jose@blancopa.com 

Case 21-21661-RAM Doc 31 Filed 03/10/22 Page 2 of 2
Samantha HOFFMAN, Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK, as Guardian of the Person of Samantha Hoffman, and SunTrust Bank, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eric Hoffman, Appellee.

No. 1D17-984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

slideshow        December 22, 2022        Desert, aquatic, prairie, forest, riparian, tundra, and sagebrush plants

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery

Podcasts        June 10, 2012        USGS CoreCast: Landslide Hazards

Podcasts        July 27, 2011        Climate Connections: Questions from North and South Carolina
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Big Data Analysis

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(10)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(33)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - hawaii(12)
              - idaho(3)
              - (-)illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(22)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1996        Analysis of suspended-sediment concentrations and discharges at four long-term sediment stations in central and southern Illinois, 1975–92 water years
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(16)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 21, 2017        Monitoring Land-Atmosphere Exchange of Moisture to Understand Drought
Michael A. TILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Docket No. FAA-2016-4220
Elvis CRUZ, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. 5101 RE CO., LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0498

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. John CERNOGORSKY, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020205EN.01000201.xml

| 19.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9587 – ENGIE/EDP Renováveis/EDPR Offshore España)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 205/02)

On 25 February 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9587. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9587. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020115EN.01000201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/2 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9753 – Hexcel/Woodward)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 115/02)

1.

On 27 March 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020115EN.01000201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hexcel Corporation (‘Hexcel’, US), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Woodward, Inc. (‘Woodward’, US). |

Hexcel enters into a full merger within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of the Merger Regulation with Woodward.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Hexcel: development, manufacture and supply of lightweight, high-performance structural materials, including carbon fibres, specialty reinforcements, ‘prepregs’, and other fibre-reinforced matrix materials, adhesives and composite structures, for use in commercial aerospace, space and defence, and other industrial sectors, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Woodward: design, manufacture, supply and servicing of control solutions for the aerospace and other industrial sectors. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020115EN.01000201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9753 – Hexcel/Woodward

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020115EN.01000201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020115EN.01000201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 19, 2009

p1112 

# Order

November 19, 2009

139131

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139131 COA: 289552 Crawford CC: 06-002406-FC RALPH EDWARD PARISH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , C.J., and C AVANAGH

, J., would grant leave to appeal.
(106 So. 710)

Nos. 27468, 27523.

#### Leon BROOKS v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT. In re CITY OF SHREVEPORT, Applying for Writs of Certiorari, Mandamus, and Prohibition. Lon BROOKS v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT.

(Nov. 30, 1925.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 4, 1926.)

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F. Bell, Judge.

B. F. Roberts, City Atty., and Thigpen, Her-old, Lee & Cousin, all of Shreveport, tor appellants.

Clifton F. Davis, of Shreveport, for appellee.

ST. PAUL, J.

This case involves exactly the same issues as in McGlothlin v. City of Shreveport, 106 So. 708,1 this day decided; and the reasons for judgment therein assigned are equally applicable here.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore reversed, and plaintiff’s suit is now dismissed, and the injunction herein sued out dissolved, at plaintiff’s cost in both courts. It is further ordered that th'e writs of certiorari and prohibition herein issued be now perpetuated.

LAND, J., takes no part.

[See note to McGlothlin v. City of Shreveport, supra.]

1

 Ante, p. 102.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3002528-MAR-201109:02 AM
Jeffrey J. CALFAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5637

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
H. R. 533 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To revoke the charter of incorporation of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma at the 

request of that tribe, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORATION. 

The request of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to surrender 

the charter of incorporation issued to that tribe and ratified by 

its members on June 1, 1940, pursuant to the Act of June 26, 

1936 (25 U.S.C. 501 et seq.; commonly known as the ‘‘Oklahoma 

Welfare Act’’), is hereby accepted and that charter of incorporation 

is hereby revoked. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: CHAPTER 7

CASE NO. 22-12790-EPK

EXCELL AUTO GROUP, INC.

Debtor.

__________________________________/

CROSS NOTICE OF TAKING 2004 EXAMINATION 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Woodside Credit, LLC (“Woodside”), by and through 

undersigned counsel, hereby cross notices the Rule 2004 Examination under oath of Scott Zankl, 

as authorized representative of the Debtor Excell Auto Group, Inc., beginning at 9:30 a.m. on 

Monday, June 6, 2022 by video conferencing. 

The examination is pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004 and Local Rule 2004-1. The scope 

of the examination is as described in Bankruptcy Rule 2004. Pursuant to Local Rule 2004-1, no 

order shall be necessary. The examination may continue from day to day until completed. If the 

Examinee requires an interpreter, it is the Examinee’s responsibility to engage the employment 

of such interpreter to be present at the examination. 

Case 22-12790-EPK Doc 135 Filed 06/03/22 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished via 

Notice of Electronic Filing by CM/ECF to all parties registered to receive such service in this 

case on this the 3rd day of June 2022.

Respectfully submitted,

LSS LAW

Counsel for Woodside Credit, LLC

2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2300

Miami, FL 33131

Tel: (305) 894-6163

Fax: (305) 503-9447

Email: cs@lss.law

/s/ Christian Somodevilla 

Christian Somodevilla, Esq.

FL Bar No. 59539

Case 22-12790-EPK Doc 135 Filed 06/03/22 Page 2 of 2