alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5322 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate 

an exemption for companies located in Puerto Rico, the 

Virgin Islands, and any other possession of the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5322 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Territories Inves3 tor Protection Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a) of the Investment 

6 Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)) is amended 

7 by striking paragraph (1). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND SAFE HARBOR.— 

9 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in 

10 paragraph (2), the amendment made by subsection 

11 (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act. 

13 (2) SAFE HARBOR.—With respect to a company 

14 that is exempt under section 6(a)(1) of the Invest15 ment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)(1)) 

16 on the day before the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act, the amendment made by subsection (a) shall 

18 take effect on the date that is 3 years after the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

20 (3) EXTENSION OF SAFE HARBOR.—The Secu21 rities and Exchange Commission, by rule and regula22 tion upon its own motion, or by order upon applica23 tion, may conditionally or unconditionally, under sec24 tion 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 

25 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(c)), further delay the effective 

26 date for a company described in paragraph (2) for 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5322 RFS 

1 a maximum of 3 years following the initial 3-year 

2 period if, before the end of the initial 3-year period, 

3 the Commission determines that such a rule, regula4 tion, motion, or order is necessary or appropriate in 

5 the public interest and for the protection of inves6 tors. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   /s/ J. S. GABRIELLI DE AZEVEDODate: June 28, 2006
    
    J. S. Gabrielli de AzevedoChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   /s/ ALMIR GUILHERME BARBASSADate: June 28, 2006
    
    Almir Guilherme BarbassaChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Material from Ms. Janice Schacter Lintz to Committee Members

Attachments 1) Effective Access 2) Subway Audio Loop - Video Clip Description 3) Subway Audio Loop - Video Clip ( link to video clip ) 4) Spain's Disability Rules
Carlos Alberto PACHECO, Appellant, v. Susana PEREZ, Appellee.

No. 3D17-366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certifications**

I, Jimmy Wang, certify that:



1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)		Omitted

c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's   other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: February 11, 2004 | /s/ Jimmy WangChief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - (-)tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
From: Todd 

Proposed 

Parfitt, 

Rules 

Director, 

for Chapters 

Department 

3, 5 and 

of 

8 

Environmental 

(R-22(b)) 

Quali

/ 

~ 

1 

Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division 

Subject: 

Date: 

Priority: 

Summary: 

June 17, 2013 

HIGH- Deadline for response is June 28, 2013 

Notice of Agency Rulemaking 

The Air Quality Division (Division) is proposing revisions to the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations listed above. The following is a brief summary of the proposed rule changes: 

• A revision to update the definition of"commenced" in the New source performanc ~ standards (NSPS) section to make the definition consistent with the federal definition. 

• A revision in the National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) section to update technical footnotes at the bottom of the hazardous air pollutants table. 

• Addition of new sections to Chapter 8 td address Clean Air Act (CA.A) requirements on 

ozone nonattainment which include: 

o Ozone nonattainment emission inventory rule, which is a new rule to establish 

requirements for the submittal of emission inventories from facilities or sources 

located in an ozone nonattainment area. 

o The addition of placeholder section numbers for future rulemaking purposes. 

o The introduction section of Chapter 8 has also been revised to reflect the 

reorganization (moving the IBR section from Section 5 to Section 1 0) and addition of placeholder section numbers to the chapter. 

• Rt:visions to address a proposed action by the En ironmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

on the treatment of excess emissions from stationary or portable diesel engines. 

• Updates to IBR (incorporation by reference) sections to adopt by reference from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for July 1, 2012. 

The proposed revisions can be seen in the attached draft rules. Specific information on the 

. changes can be found in the Statement of Principal Reasons (SOPR). Chapter 3, Sections 2 and 9, and Chapter 8, Sections 5 and 10, involve changes to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Wyoming Air Quality Advisory Board met in Riverton, Wyoming on June 5, 2013, and recommended that these revisions be taken forward through the rulemaking 

process. 

Agency Contact Name: 

Agency Contact Phone: 

Agency Contact Email: 

Christine Anderson 

307-675-5624 

tina.andersonra wvo. gov 

Herschler Buildmg · 122 West 25th Street · Ch yenne. WY 82002 · http://deq.state.wy.us ~\1 J\ !If' I," )J 

I I I ' I 
Signature: 

6~~

Governor 's Counsel 

2 

If no response has been received by the 1 0'11 working day, the agency will proceed with these rules.
# C_2020016EN.01004701.xml

| 17.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/47

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9408 — Assa Abloy/Agta Record)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 16/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Assa Abloy AB (publ) (Sweden, ‘Assa Abloy’), |
| --- | --- |

—

Assa Abloy AB (publ) (Sweden, ‘Assa Abloy’),

| — | Agta Record ag (Switzerland, ‘Agta Record’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Agta Record ag (Switzerland, ‘Agta Record’).

Assa Abloy acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Agta Record. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Assa Abloy: manufacture and supply of automatic pedestrian doors, industrial doors, locks, sensors and access control systems and components, as well as the provision of after-sales services for automatic pedestrian doors and industrial doors, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Assa Abloy: manufacture and supply of automatic pedestrian doors, industrial doors, locks, sensors and access control systems and components, as well as the provision of after-sales services for automatic pedestrian doors and industrial doors,

| — | for Agta Record: manufacture and supply of automatic pedestrian doors and industrial doors, as well as the provision of after-sales services for automatic pedestrian doors and industrial doors. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Agta Record: manufacture and supply of automatic pedestrian doors and industrial doors, as well as the provision of after-sales services for automatic pedestrian doors and industrial doors.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9408 — Assa Abloy/Agta Record

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 13
- 00336
- CV
WILLIAM PATRICK ALEX ANDER , Appellant v. LISA M. BIRNEL, RONA LD FOX, EDWARD SMITH, WILLIS W. OWE NS, III, JOHN E. RIT TER, GILBERT CAMPUZANO, A ND BRUCE ARMSTRONG , Appellee s

From the 52nd Distric t Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. COT
- 11
- 40924

MEMORANDUM OPINION
William P. Alexander, a prison inmate, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of six of eight defendants sued by Alexander. By letter dated October 31, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Alexander that the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that the order which i s the subject of the appeal is not a final, appealable order because it does not dispose of all parties and claims. By the same letter, the Clerk also warned Alexander that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within 10 days from the date of the let ter, a responseAlexander v. Bi r nel Page 2

was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. A response was filed on November 12, 2013 but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Alexander argues in his response that Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedu re allows him to appeal an order that does not dispose of all parties and claims. The federal rules do not apply to Texas state courts of appeal. As a general rule in Texas, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp

. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An order or judgment is final when it disposes of all parties and claims. Id . at 205. The order Alexander attempts to appeal does not dispose of his claims against two defendants, Lisa M. Birnel and Ronald C. Fox.
Accor dingly, the trial court's order, signed on September 11, 2013, is not final, and Alexander may not appeal that order at this time. This appeal is dismissed. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(a). 1

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 21 , 2013 [CV06]

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this C ourt reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court, a petition for review must be filed with the Texas Supreme Court clerk within 45 days after either the date the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the date the last ruling on all timely motions for rehearing was made by the court of appeals. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 53.7(a).
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 97036-97037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28620]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4825-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

New York; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York (FEMA-4825-DR), dated September 24, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on October 22, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Catharine O. 
Fan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.

[[Page 97037]]

    This action terminates the appointment of Lai Sun Yee as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-28620 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(20)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(11)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 3, 2017        What is Devils Hole in Nevada?
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00137-CV

Style: Alex Melvin Junior

v Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles

Date motion filed*: April 30, 2013

Type of motion: First Request for Extension of Time

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Appellant’s request for an extension of time to pay the necessary fees is GRANTED.

The $175 filing fee was originally due in this appeal on March 1, 2013. Appellant is hereby 

ORDERED to pay the required $175 filing fee to the Clerk of this Court by May 31, 2013. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) 

(West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2011). If appellant does not pay the required $175 filing fee 

to the Clerk of this Court by May 31, 2013, the Court will dismiss this appeal for failure to pay the 

filing fee without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

The clerk’s record was originally due in this appeal on March 25, 2013. Appellant is ORDERED 

to pay the Harris County District Clerk’s office the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by 

May 31, 2013. If evidence that the appellant has paid the district clerk for the preparation of the 

clerk’s record is not filed by May 31, 2013, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution 

without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3.

Judge's signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: May 1, 2013
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 05-1395

STEPHEN M. RAKES; NICHOLE RAKES; MEREDITH RAKES; 

COLBY RAKES; STIPPO'S, INC.; GARY W. CRUICKSHANK, as Trustee in

bankruptcy of Stephen M. Rakes,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

 Defendant, Appellee.

No. 05-1396

JULIE RAKES DAMMERS,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant, Appellee.

 

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 23, 2006 is corrected as follows:

On page 24, line 3, replace "the government" with "an objective observer"

On page 24, line 4, replace "the government" with "such an observer"

On page 28, line 8, replace "the government" with "an objective observer"
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of OneCap on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ending  September 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Vincent W. Hesser, Chief Executive
Officer and Tammy Hardcastle, acting principal financial officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                           /s/ Vincent W. Hesser
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                          Vincent W. Hesser
                                          Chief Executive Officer



                                           /s/ Tammy Hardcastle
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                          Tammy Hardcastle
                                          Treasurer
                                          (Acting Principal Financial Officer)
William Lee FERGUSON, Indiv. and on Behalf of Crystal Ann Ferguson (D) v. LAMMICO, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0884

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Clifford M.
Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Clifford M. Gross

Name: Clifford M. GrossDate: August 5, 2004
 Page 34 of 35