alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

 Chapter 11 

A&E ADVENTURES LLC,1

 Case No. 21-19272-LMI 

 

Debtor. 

_______________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING DECLARATION OF MICHAEL ABECASSIS 

IN SUPPORT OF FIRST DAY MOTIONS 

 A&E Adventures LLC (“Debtor” or “GameTime”), by and through undersigned counsel, 

hereby files the Declaration of Michael Abecassis in Support of First Day Motions. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on 

September 29, 2021, via the Court’s Notice of Electronic Filing upon the Registered Users listed 

on the attached Exhibit 1. 

 s/ James C. Moon 

James C. Moon, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 938211 

jmoon@melandbudwick.com

Meaghan E. Murphy, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 102770 

mmurphy@melandbudwick.com 

MELAND BUDWICK, P.A. 

3200 Southeast Financial Center 

200 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 358-6363 

Telecopy: (305) 358-1221 

Proposed Attorneys for Debtor 

1

 The Debtor’s current mailing address is 5000 Oaks Rd, Unit H, Davie, FL 33314. The Debtor’s EIN is 43-

2110385. 

Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 1 of 11
  

EXHIBIT 1 

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service 

for this case. 

 Ryan E Davis rdavis@whww.com, 

thiggens@whww.com;thiggens@ecf.courtdrive.com 

 James C. Moon jmoon@melandbudwick.com, 

ltannenbaum@melandbudwick.com;mrbnefs@yahoo.com;jmoon@ecf.courtdrive.com;lta

nnenbaum@ecf.courtdrive.com;phornia@ecf.courtdrive.com 

 Meaghan E Murphy mmurphy@melandbudwick.com, 

ltannenbaum@melandbudwick.com;mrbnefs@melandbudwick.com;ltannenbaum@ecf.c

ourtdrive.com;phornia@ecf.courtdrive.com;mmurphy@ecf.courtdrive.com 

 Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 2 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 3 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 4 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 5 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 6 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 7 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 8 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 9 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 10 of 11
Case 21-19272-LMI Doc 24 Filed 09/29/21 Page 11 of 11
* John T. Boyd , Chi ef Just ice (Ret.), Seventh Cou rt of Appeal s, si tt ing by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code An n. §7 5.00 2(a) (1) (V erno n Su pp. 2 002 ). NO. 07-01-0108-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E DECEMBER 30 , 2002

______________________________

DAVID MEDI NA, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 1 08TH DI STRICT COURT OF PO TTER CO UNTY; NO. 43029-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., an d BOYD, SJ. * David Medina (appel lant) appeals from a final judgment under which he w as convicted of delivery

of a controlled substance. Through a single issue, he contends that he was denied due process and a fa ir tri a l since the “ State failed to all ow [him] to take a shower or sleep on any

thing other than concr

ete prior to the [punishment] hearing” and the trial court “would not allow him to explain his appearance to the jury.” This issueis identical to that raised in David Medina v. State, No. 07- 01-0107-CR, pending in thi s court.2

Cons eque ntly, we adopt the reasoning and discussi on in our opini on issued thisday in cause number 07- 01-0107-CR and conclude that i t sufficient ly dispos es of the single issue appellant rai ses at bar. I n doing so, w e also overrule appellant’s content ion an d affirm the judgment entered below. Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish

.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Center News        April 9, 2023        The paper is out: Did you know about cascading hazards from asteroid impacts?

Center News        June 28, 2022        Asteroid Day: How do you prepare for an asteroid impact?

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7142

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. WILLIAM ELDRIDGE ASKEW, III , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:14

- cr - 00023

- D

- 2 ; 5:18

- cv - 00232

- D )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON , DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. William Eldridge Askew, III , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: William Eldridge Askew, III , s eeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability w ill not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Askew has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion to appoint counsel, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: May 8, 2009
# C_2020398EN.01000101.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10000 — PreZero International/SUEZ Nordic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 398/01)

On 17 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10000. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10000. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of KAL Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Bloking,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:
      May 8, 2009/s/
      William BlokingWilliam
      BlokingPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Denver Ivan WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1258

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20699 and #20700; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20012]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 6.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated September 28, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Helene.                    

# DATES:

Issued on November 22, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         September 23, 2024 through October 7, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         January 7, 2025.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated September 28, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 7, 2025.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-28279 Filed 12-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Marcaurel Adme PIERRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(18)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - (-)nevada(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        February 22, 2017        Stormy weather: How the USGS goes to work monitoring its effects
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual report of Knobias,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Susan R. Walker, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  April 17, 2007                            By: /s/ SUSAN R. WALKER
                                                    ------------------
                                                 Susan R. Walker
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Uranerz Energy Corporation, (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to
the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 (the Report) that:

| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Date: March 11, 2009



| | /s/
      Benjamin Leboe          
| | ----------------------------------
| | Benjamin Leboe                    
| | Chief Financial Officer, Principal
| | Financial and Accounting Officer  











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,879,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,929,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 21,465,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      19,061,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,276,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             104,123,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      120,062,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,452,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               104,123,000
<SALES>                                     38,030,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,000,000
<CGS>                                       20,886,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,478,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,734,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (671,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (671,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (671,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders

Class		Principal	Interest		Ending Balance
A-1		860,628.27	1,253,423.23	269,662,371.73
A-2		           0.00	2,422,228.44	478,589,000.00
XI		           0.00	   531,144.16	962,975,439.73
X2		           0.00	   465.562.78	533,628,000.00
B	                         0.00	   219,976.40	  42,168,000.00
C		           0.00 	   209,150.03	  38,553,000.00
D		           0.00	     73,333.27	  13,253,000.00
E		           0.00	     42,470.38	    7,229,000.00
F		           0.00	     84,934.88	  14,457,000.00
G		           0.00	     70,782.00	  12,048,000.00
H		           0.00	    134,860.20	  27,711,000.00
I		           0.00	      41,040.60	    8,433,000.00
J		           0.00	      36,145.00	    7,229,000.00
K		           0.00	      60,240.00	   12,048,000.00
L	                         0.00	      24,095.00	     4,819,000.00
M		          0.00	      24,095.00	     4,819,000.00
N		          0.00	     108,435.54	    21,687,068.00
R		          0.00		  0.00
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Morgan Group Holdings Co. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert E. Dolan, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert E. Dolan

Name: Robert E. Dolan

Title: Principal Accounting Officer
 Date: March 1, 2011
Motion Granted and Order filed June 23, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00708

- CR

____________ ODEL RODRICK ALLEN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 1324945



### ORDER
The State filed a motion to seal or strike appellant’s brief because it discloses the name of a child victim of family violence under the age of 17. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 57B.02(h). The motion to strike is GRANTED. Accordingly, a ppellant is ordered to file a brief that does not contain the name of a child victim of family violence under the age of 17.Further, this appeal was abated on June 2, 2015, for the trial court to file

writt en fact findings and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s

statement . A supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings and
conclusions was filed June 17, 2015. Accordingly, the appeal has been reinstated. Appellant’s brief may ther efore reference the trial court’s written findings and conclusions if appropriate. Appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
Georges ELOU, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3108

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.