alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Zwebner, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal Communication Systems, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Universal Communication Systems, Inc. and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 21, 2006

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ MICHAELZWEBNER     
| |     | Michael Zwebner        
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Te xas

July 13, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00175

- CR

Simon Peter MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR5551

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Pat ricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The State’s “Motion to Change Designation and Publish Opinion” is GRANTED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of July, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                                       TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Charles E. Robinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: October 3, 2003               /s/ Charles E. Robinson
                                    -----------------------
                                    Charles E. Robinson
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chairman of the Board of
                                    Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
STATE EX REL. James Richard WEEMS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0980

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his/her burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in state collateral proceedings in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
CITY OF YOUNGSVILLE v. C.H. FENSTERMAKER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-00824

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05555**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05555\05555_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05555\05555_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05555\05555_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05555\05555_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05555\Certification Statement_Plant ID_05555.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - (-)products_data(3)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Data Release        February 5, 2024        Geochemistry and High-Resolution Backscattered Electron Imaging of Meteor Crater Impact Melts

Data Release        February 17, 2023        Meteor Crater, Northern Arizona: Drill Hole Sample Collection, 1970-1973, and Curation, 2010-2013

Data Release        February 8, 2023        A Lithostratigraphic Analysis of the Meteor Crater Ejecta Blanket: Measurements, Assigned Facies, and Unit Thickness

map        January 20, 2014        Geologic map of the eastern quarter of the Flagstaff 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, Coconino County, northern Arizona
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of New Peoples Bankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004,
which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of New Peoples Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for
any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ KENNETH D. HART                            
|                     |  |  |  | Kenneth D. Hart                                
|                     |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer            
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ C. TODD ASBURY                             
|                     |  |  |  | C. Todd Asbury                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Daniel PATERNOSTER, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, as Trustee, et al., Appellee.

No. 4D16-1564

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 9, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**DANIEL J. THOMAS**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§ 1350**

 

I, Daniel J. Thomas, of Concentra OperatingCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

August 9, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, David Genzler, the undersigned Principal Accounting Officer of Dynamic Response Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ David Genzler                          
|                        |  | David Genzler, Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90601]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35620; File No. SR-Amex-95-10]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments 
Updating Various Exchange Rules

April 18, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-10044 beginning on page 20130 in the issue of 
Monday, April 24, 1995 make the following correction:
    On page 20131, in the first column, immediately preceding the file 
line, insert the signature line ``Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy 
Secretary.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
S.C., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 9, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Coastal breach in St. Augustine, Florida caused by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Breach on Portsmouth Island in North Carolina caused by Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Part of the Outer Banks in North Carolina eroded by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        February 10, 2023        Boulder, Colorado

Policy and Directives        November 14, 2019        Final PEIs with Appendicies

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        GOES-16 and Landsat 8
Humberto PANIAGUA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jean C. GONZALEZ and Denise Gonzalez, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0210

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(2)
              - (-)north carolina(5)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 6, 2011        Groundwater Awareness Week is March 6-12

Podcasts        June 2, 2010        Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems

Podcasts        April 20, 2011        Climate Connections: Visiting Students in North Carolina (Episode 1)

Podcasts        May 10, 2011        Connecting People and Urban Streams

Podcasts        September 5, 2011        Responding to Hurricanes, Floods and Droughts in North Carolina
AFS-15-3962-E 

April 4, 2016 

 Exemption No. 16034 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3858 

Mr. Marvin Baird 

Director of Operations 

Nicholas Services, LLC 

P.O. Box 8889 

Columbus, MS 39705 

Dear Mr. Baird: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated September 29, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Nicholas Services, LLC (Nicholas Air) for an exemption from 

§ 61.51(f)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to 

allow Nicholas Air to assign a second-in-command (SIC) in an aircraft that otherwise does 

not require one by type certificate. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to Nicholas Air. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 9770, as amended (copy 

enclosed), the FAA noted that Ameriflight did not require an exemption to place a second 

pilot for safety purposes. Ameriflight requested the same relief to allow the assignment of a 

SIC during a flight that otherwise does not require a SIC and allow that SIC to log that flight 

time pursuant to a certificate or rating. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial 

of Exemption No. 9770, as amended; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 9770, as 

amended, also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption would not be in the public 

interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 

and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, I hereby deny the petition of Nicholas 

Services, LLC for an exemption from 14 CFR § 61.51(f)(2). 

Sincerely, 

//s// 

John S. Duncan 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure 

Exemption No. 9770C
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Thomas Breen, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of id-Confirm, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of id-Confirm, Inc.
| Date: | February 20, 2007 |
|-------|-------------------|

/s/ Thomas Breen                                            

Thomas Breen

President, Chief Operating Officer, 

Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ROBERT C. ROWE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 79 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 2nd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for** 

**Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Klaus Moeller, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which
         this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.

Dated:  November 14, 2002                           /s/ Klaus Moeller
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Klaus Moeller
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 33.3

LOGO



REGULUS

A 31 Infotech Company

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1. Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100  Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. §§229.1100-229.1123 (Regulation AB), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (individually and collectively Regulus), is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who are issuers or servicers of asset
backed securities transactions and who have requested confirmation of Regulus compliance in connection with loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform).
Remittance processing is a service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of
the payment.

2. The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used in
Regulus assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such
criteria the Applicable Servicing Criteria). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform
because Regulus does not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria.

3. As
of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, Regulus has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

4. KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Regulus assessment of
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. A copy of that attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Kathleen Hamburger

Kathleen Hamburger

Chief Executive Officer and President

February 11, 2011