alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020060EN.01000401.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9715 — PCG/PCC/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 60/03)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | PETRONAS Chemicals Group Berhad (‘PCG’, Malaysia), controlled by Petroliam Nasional Berhad (‘PETRONAS’, Malaysia), |
| --- | --- |

—

PETRONAS Chemicals Group Berhad (‘PCG’, Malaysia), controlled by Petroliam Nasional Berhad (‘PETRONAS’, Malaysia),

| — | PCC SE (‘PCC’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

PCC SE (‘PCC’, Germany),

| — | PCC Oxyalkylates Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (‘PCC Oxyalkylates’, Malaysia), controlled by PCC. |
| --- | --- |

—

PCC Oxyalkylates Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (‘PCC Oxyalkylates’, Malaysia), controlled by PCC.

PCG acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of PCC Oxyalkylates.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for PCG: active primarily in manufacturing and selling a diversified range of petrochemical products, |
| --- | --- |

—

for PCG: active primarily in manufacturing and selling a diversified range of petrochemical products,

| — | for PCC: holding and parent company of the PCC Group and its affiliated companies. The PCC Group is active in the chemicals sector, the logistics sector and the energy sector, |
| --- | --- |

—

for PCC: holding and parent company of the PCC Group and its affiliated companies. The PCC Group is active in the chemicals sector, the logistics sector and the energy sector,

| — | for PCC Oxyalkylates: will be active in the manufacturing and marketing of certain finished unblended oxyalkylates products, mainly in the Asia Pacific region. |
| --- | --- |

—

for PCC Oxyalkylates: will be active in the manufacturing and marketing of certain finished unblended oxyalkylates products, mainly in the Asia Pacific region.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9715 – PCG/PCC/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance

 

Capital One Bank

11013 West Broad Street

Glen Allen, Virginia23060

 

And

 

The Bank of New York, asTrustee

101 Barclay Street, Floor8 West

Corporate TrustAdministration – Asset Backed Securities Unit

New York, NY  10286

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report ofManagement on Compliance*, that Capital One Bank (the “Bank”), awholly owned subsidiary of Capital One Financial Corporation, complied in allmaterial respects with the requirements of Sections 3.1, 3.4(a), 3.4(b), and5.2 of Asset Pool 1 Supplement dated as of October 9, 2002 to the Indenturedated as of October 9, 2002 and Sections 4.02 and 4.03 of the Transfer andAdministration Agreement dated as of October 9, 2002 regarding the Capital OneMulti-Asset Execution Trust, Series 2002-CC Notes (collectively the “Agreements”), which were filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on Form 8-K on November 12, 2002, for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Bank’s compliance withthose requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Bank’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examinationwas conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the U.S.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with those requirementsand performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank’scompliance with specified requirements.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Bank complied with the aforementioned Sectionsof the Agreements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

 
| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG  LLP |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
|                       |
| March 15, 2006             |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50850

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUADALUPE ALEJANDRA HERNANDEZ-DELUNA, also known as 

Guadalupe Alejandra Herndandez-Deluna,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-833-2

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Alejandra HernandezDeluna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Deluna has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-50850 Document: 00513080607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-50850

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-50850 Document: 00513080607 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (4:02-cr-70031-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cabiness , No. 4:02-cr-70031-1 (W.D. Va. July 28, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy , 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Annganette G. FLORES, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Carol HERNANDEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1317

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Adrian MCKENNEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2560

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
2132 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–238 Filed 1–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184–01–C
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Carole R. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of UTEK Corporation, certify that:
1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of UTEK Corporation;
2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
           (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
           (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
           (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
           (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
           (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Dated this 7th day of May, 2004.   By: Carole R. Wright
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5351 

To prohibit the transfer of any individual detained at United States Naval 

Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2016 

Mrs. WALORSKI (for herself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. ZINKE, and 

Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the transfer of any individual detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ANY TRANSFER OF ANY INDI4 VIDUAL DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL 

5 STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—No amounts authorized to be ap7 propriated or otherwise available for any department or 

8 agency of the United States Government may be used dur9 ing the period specified in subsection (b) to transfer, re10 lease, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5351 IH

1 United States, its territories, or possessions, or to any for2 eign country or entity, of any individual detained at Guan3 tanamo. 

4 (b) SPECIFIED PERIOD.—The period specified in this 

5 subsection is the period that— 

6 (1) begins on the date of the enactment of this 

7 Act; and 

8 (2) ends on the earlier of— 

9 (A) the date of the enactment of an Act 

10 authorizing appropriations for military activities 

11 of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 

12 2017; or 

13 (B) January 1, 2017. 

14 (c) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DE15 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘individual detained at 

16 Guantanamo’’ means an individual located at United 

17 States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of Octo18 ber 1, 2009, who— 

19 (1) is not a national of the United States (as 

20 defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration 

21 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)) or a 

22 member of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

23 and 

24 (2) is— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5351 IH

1 (A) in the custody or under the control of 

2 the Department of Defense; or 

3 (B) otherwise detained at United States 

4 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 545 

To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to 

the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. DENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To add engaging in or supporting hostilities against the 

United States to the list of acts for which United States 

nationals would lose their nationality. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enemy Expatriation 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOSS OF NATIONALITY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 349 of the Immigration 

8 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 545 IH

1 (A) in each of paragraphs (1) through (6), 

2 by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

3 (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the pe4 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) engaging in, or purposefully and materially 

7 supporting, hostilities against the United States.’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(c) For purposes of this section, the term ‘hostilities’ 

11 means any conflict subject to the laws of war.’’. 

12 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 351(a) of the 

13 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1483(a)) is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘(6) and (7)’’ and inserting ‘‘(6), (7), 

15 and (8)’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(4) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-Falcone Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5309 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5309

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, as the ``Army First Lieutenant 
                Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST LIEUTENANT DONALD C. CARWILE POST OFFICE 
BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Army First 
Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Canyonlands National Park

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(7)
              - colorado(8)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(2)
              - (-)south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(44)
              - washington(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2000        Test of a modified habitat suitability model for bighorn sheep
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WASHINGTON MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-MS12;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as
servicers and sub-servicers:

     Greenpoint Mortgage Company, Litton Loan Servicing LP, Old Kent Bank,
Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - montana(2)
              - (-)utah(1)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

publication        July 1, 1995        Roberts rift, Canyonlands, Utah, a natural hydraulic fracture caused by comet or asteroid impact
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Innovative Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    | (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |            |                                                                                                                                           |
|         | (2)        | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|                     |                     | /s/ Mihir K. Taneja                                       |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                     |                                                           |
|      |      | Mihir K. Taneja Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2002 |
|                     |                     |                                                      |
David FLEMING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-414

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ryan WALKER, Appellant, v. Heather WALKER, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2204

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 30, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.