alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020023EN.01001301.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9699 – Mitsubishi Corporation/Eneco Groep)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 23/12)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC’, Japan), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC’, Japan),

| — | Eneco Groep N.V. (‘Eneco’, the Netherlands). |
| --- | --- |

—

Eneco Groep N.V. (‘Eneco’, the Netherlands).

MC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Eneco.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | MC is a global integrated trading company which develops and operates businesses across a variety of industries. MC (through its subsidiaries) is active in the development, construction and operation of windfarms, generation and wholesale supply of electricity and in trading of electricity in the EEA, |
| --- | --- |

—

MC is a global integrated trading company which develops and operates businesses across a variety of industries. MC (through its subsidiaries) is active in the development, construction and operation of windfarms, generation and wholesale supply of electricity and in trading of electricity in the EEA,

| — | Eneco is active in the production and storage of electricity from (sustainable) resources, including wind, solar, water and bio-energy, the supply of electricity and gas to private and business customers, and provision of ancillary services. |
| --- | --- |

—

Eneco is active in the production and storage of electricity from (sustainable) resources, including wind, solar, water and bio-energy, the supply of electricity and gas to private and business customers, and provision of ancillary services.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9699 – Mitsubishi Corporation/Eneco Groep

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

| Postal address: |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
# C_2020394EN.01000501.xml

| 19.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10022 — Premier Oil/Chrysaor Holdings)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 394/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Premier Oil Plc, (‘Premier Oil’, the United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

Premier Oil Plc, (‘Premier Oil’, the United Kingdom),

| — | Chrysaor Holdings Limited (‘CHL’, the United Kingdom), indirectly controlled by EIG Global Energy Partners (together with its advisory affiliates, ‘EIG’, the United States). |
| --- | --- |

—

Chrysaor Holdings Limited (‘CHL’, the United Kingdom), indirectly controlled by EIG Global Energy Partners (together with its advisory affiliates, ‘EIG’, the United States).

Premier Oil acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of CHL.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Premier Oil: exploration and production of significant oil and gas interests in the UK and worldwide, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Premier Oil: exploration and production of significant oil and gas interests in the UK and worldwide,

| — | for CHL: the development and commercialisation of oil and gas incremental reserves, including interests in exploration licences in the UK sector of the North Sea and Norway. |
| --- | --- |

—

for CHL: the development and commercialisation of oil and gas incremental reserves, including interests in exploration licences in the UK sector of the North Sea and Norway.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10022 — Premier Oil/Chrysaor Holdings

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Ira Bernard PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert LARKIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Bryan BIEGAJ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 03, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

NICOLE BOATNER, No. 84979 

vs. 

Appellant, FILED 

RANDY BROWN, 

Respondent. JUL 2 1 2022 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK:5r WPREME COURT 

BY • 1 

DEPUTYC= "1".111 RKY /44

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order awarding 

respondent temporary sole legal and physical custody of the parties' minor 

children. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, 

Judge. 

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court 

reveals a jurisdictional defect. No statute or court rule allows an appeal 

from a temporary custody order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 

Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider 

appeals authorized by statute or court rule"); In re Ternporary Custody of 

Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no 

appeal may be taken from temporary custody orders subject to periodic 

mandatory review); NRAP 3A(b)(7) (allowing an appeal from a district court 

order that finally alters custody of minor children). Accordingly, this court 

lacks jurisdiction and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

Hardesty 

J. J. 

Stiglich Herndon SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

10) I947A 02.2 -3031 
cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge 

Nicole Boatner 

Randy Brown 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 2
November 17, 2014

Department of Transportation

Aviation Consumer Protection 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Sixth Meeting of the Advisory Co mmittee for Aviation Consumer Protection,

Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0087

To Whom It May Concern:

The Telecommunications Industr y Association (“TIA”) and the Information Technology Industry Council (“ITI”) jointly submit this letter in response to the a bove referenced meeting. 1
TIA and ITA appreciate the Advisory Committee’ s attention to potentia l consumer protection

issues related to the use of mobile wi reless devices for voice calls on aircraft.

TIA and ITI are pleased that all speakers on th is issue clarified that there are no consumer protection concerns asso ciated with the use of mobile de vices onboard aircraft for “quiet” applications (e.g., SMS and data/email), and that the Department of Transportation’s inquiry is limited to the impact of voice calls only. TI A and ITI support the remarks by Kevin Rogers, CEO of AeroMobile, regarding in -flight use of mobile devices onboard foreign airlines. Among other things, Mr. Rogers presente d information establis hing that many airlines have chosen to disable voice service and, for airlines that c hoose to offer voice (including airlines flying regularly to and from the United States that serv e a large percentage of U.S. passengers), the use of mobile voice applications has had no adve rse effects on airline ope rations or passengers.

Accordingly, the Department need not adopt a ban on in-flight mobile voice onboard U.S.

airlines. Rather than an a priori ban that limits airline and cons umer choice, the Department should permit U.S. airlines to retain the choice of offering applications such as text, mobile data, and voice that they determine best suit their passe ngers’ needs. The introduction of new in-flight connectivity applications, includi ng in-flight use of mobile devices as an alternative to WiFibased offerings, will enhance competition in the in-flight connectivity market and the passenger experience onboard aircraft.

Please contact Danielle Coffey ( dcoffey@tiaonline.org ) or Vince Jesaitis ( vjesaitis@itic.org ) with any questions re garding this letter.

Sincerely,

Telecommunications Industry Association Information Technology Industry Council 1320 N. Court House Road Suite 200 1101 K Street, N.W. Suite 610 Arlington, VA 22201 Washington, D.C. 20005

1 TIA and ITI jointly filed comments in response to the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the use of mob ile wireless devices for voice calls on aircraft. See Joint

Comments of the Telecommunications Industr y Association and The Information Technology Industry Council, Docket No. DOT-OST -2014-0002, RIN No. 2105-AE30 (Apr. 7, 2014).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jeffrey Lubell, President and Chief Executive Officer and Charles A. Lesser, Chief Financial Officer of True Religion Apparel, Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the annual report on Form 10-KSB of True Religion Apparel, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of True Religion Apparel, Inc.

Dated:  April 14, 2004

/s/  Jeffrey Lubell	Jeffrey Lubell
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/  Charles A. Lesser	Charles A. Lesser
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to True Religion Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by True Religion Apparel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Scott A. GREENBERG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Bjorn E. BRUNVAND, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2811

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Dyas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ James Dyas
--------------
James Dyas
Principal Financial Officer

November 14, 2006
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5192 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for overflights of national 

recreation areas where the primary recreational activities involve motorized watercraft, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2016 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for overflights of national recreation areas where the primary 

recreational activities involve motorized watercraft, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OVERFLIGHTS OF NATIONAL PARKS. 

4 Section 40128(e) of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ ; 

7 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and 

8 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5192 IH

1 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(3) national recreation areas where the pri3 mary recreational activities involve motorized 

4 watercraft.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5242 

To prohibit Executive agencies from using funds for yoga classes or 

instruction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2016 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit Executive agencies from using funds for yoga 

classes or instruction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR YOGA 

4 CLASSES OR INSTRUCTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds made available in fiscal 

6 year 2016 or any subsequent fiscal year may be used by 

7 an Executive agency for— 

8 (1) yoga classes or any other form of yoga in9 struction; or 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5242 IH

1 (2) entering into any contract providing for 

2 such classes or instruction. 

3 (b) DEFINITION OF EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—In this 

4 section, the term ‘‘Executive agency’’ has the meaning 

5 given such term in section 105 of title 5, United States 

6 Code, and includes the United States Postal Service and 

7 the Postal Regulatory Commission, but does not include 

8 the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland 

9 Security, or the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 120 (Thursday, June 22, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-8995]



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 35989]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

[Docket No. 060228055-6055-01]
RIN 0694-AD62


Implementation of Unilateral Chemical/Biological (CB) Controls on 
Certain Biological Agents and Toxins; Clarification of Controls on 
Medical Products Containing Certain Toxins on the Australia Group (AG) 
Common Control Lists; Additions to the List of States Parties to the 
Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)

Correction

    In rule document E6-8995 beginning on page 33614 in the issue of 
Monday, June 12, 2006, make the following correction:
    Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 [Corrected]
    On page 33621, in Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, the table is 
corrected in part to read as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Control(s)                          Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
NS applies to ``technology'' for items    NS Column 2.
 controlled by 1A004.
MT applies to ``technology'' for items    MT Column 1.
 controlled by 1A101, 1B001, 1B101,
 1B102, 1B115 to 1B119, 1C001, 1C007,
 1C011, 1C101, 1C102, 1C107, 1C111,
 1C116, 1C117, or 1C118 for MT reasons.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[FR Doc. Z6-8995 Filed 6-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption

Interviews        July 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 97 – EROS 50th: Earth As Art Bonus

Interviews        September 15, 2010        Making Waves: Hypoxia in U.S. Coastal Waters

Interviews        May 10, 2010        Recovery Act Funds Benefit Louisiana Black Bears

Satellite imagery        December 4, 2015        Titan Cassini VIMS

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
Martino SOUFFRANT, DOC #D00077, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1401

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: November 9, 2009
Heather GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3226

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 14, 2018

James P. Waczewski, Waczewski Law Group, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Given the lack of legally sufficient proof to support restitution in the amount of $107,333.00, we reverse the final order of restitution and remand this cause to the trial court to conduct a new evidentiary hearing to determine the appropriate amount of restitution. *See**Glaubius v. State* , 688 So.2d 913, 916 (Fla. 1997) ; *D.E.M. v. State* , 109 So.3d 1229, 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.