2016 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

permission of the Captain of the Port 

(COTP), Sector Boston. However, the 

COTP hereby grants vessels permission 

to enter this security zone as long as 

such vessels remain beyond one 

hundred (100) yards of the Moakley 

Courthouse and as long as such vessels 

proceed through the area with caution 

and operate at a speed no faster than 

that speed necessary to maintain a safe 

course, unless otherwise required by the 

Navigation Rules. 

(2) Although vessels have permission 

to enter the security zone under the 

conditions mentioned in the preceding 

paragraph, no person or vessel may 

come within one hundred (100) yards of 

the Moakley Courthouse under any 

conditions unless given express 

permission from the COTP or the 

COTP’s designated representatives. 

(3) Any person or vessel permitted to 

enter the security zone shall comply 

with the directions and orders of the 

COTP or the COTP’s representatives. 

Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast 

Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing 

lights, or other means, the operator of a 

vessel within the zone shall proceed as 

directed. Any person or vessel within 

the security zone shall exit the zone 

when directed by the COTP or the 

COTP’s representatives. 

(4) To obtain permissions required by 

this regulation, individuals may reach 

the COTP or a COTP representative via 

VHF channel 16 or 617–223–5757 

(Sector Boston Command Center) to 

obtain permission. 

(5) Penalties. Those who violate this 

section are subject to the penalties set 

forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 

192. 

(c) Effective and Enforcement Period. 

This rule is effective and will be 

enforced with actual notice starting 

12:01 a.m. on Monday, January 5, 2015 

to 11:59 p.m. December 31, 2015. 

(d) Notification. Coast Guard Sector 

Boston will give actual notice to 

mariners for the purpose of enforcement 

of this temporary security zone. Also, 

Sector Boston will notify the public to 

the greatest extent possible of any 

period in which the Coast Guard will 

suspend enforcement of this security 

zone. 

(e) COTP Representative. The COTP’s 

representative may be any Coast Guard 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

or any Federal, state, or local law 

enforcement officer who has been 

designated by the COTP to act on the 

COTP’s behalf. The COTP’s 

representative may be on a Coast Guard 

vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel, 

a state or local law enforcement vessel, 

or a location on shore. 

Dated: December 22, 2014. 

J.C. O’Connor III, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Boston. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00327 Filed 1–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0696; FRL–9921–38– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Ventura County 

Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a revision to the Ventura 

County Air Pollution Control District 

(VCAPCD) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). This 

revision concerns the District’s 

reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) requirements under the 2008 8- 

hour ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS). We are 

approving this document under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: This rule will be effective on 

February 17, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0696 for 

this action. Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On October 29, 2014 (79 FR 64353), 

EPA proposed to approve the following 

document into the California SIP. 

Local 

agency Document Adopted Submitted 

VCAPCD 2014 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

(‘‘2014 RACT SIP’’).

6/10/14 7/18/14 

VCAPCD’s submittal also included 

the following negative declarations 

which the District certified that it had 

no sources subject to the control 

techniques guidelines (CTG) documents. 

CTG source category CTG reference document 

Aerospace ....................................... EPA–453/R–97–004, Aerospace CTG and MACT 

Automobile and Light-duty Trucks, 

Surface Coating of.

EPA–450/2–77–008, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: 

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

EPA 453/R–08–006, Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. 

Cans and Coils, Surface Coating of EPA–450/2–77–008, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: 

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 2017 

CTG source category CTG reference document 

Flat Wood Paneling, Surface Coating of.EPA–450/2–78–032, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII: 

Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling. 

EPA–453/R–06–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings. 

Flexible Packaging Printing ............ EPA–453/R–06–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing. 

Large Appliances, Surface Coating 

of.

EPA–450/2–77–034, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V: 

Surface Coating of Large Appliances. 

EPA 453/R–07–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings. 

Magnet Wire, Surface Coating for 

Insulation of.

EPA–450/2–77–033, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV: 

Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire. 

Metal Furniture Coatings ................ EPA–450/2–77–032, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III: 

Surface Coating of Metal Furniture. 

EPA 453/R–07–005, Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings. 

Paper, Film and Foil Coatings ........ EPA 453/R–07–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings. 

Petroleum Refineries ...................... EPA–450/2–77–025, Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds. 

EPA–450/2–78–036, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment. 

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing ....... EPA 453/R–08–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials. 

Industrial Adhesives ........................ EPA 453/R–08–005, Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives. 

Pharmaceutical Products ................ EPA–450/2–78–029, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products. 

Pneumatic Rubber Tires, Manufacture of.EPA–450/2–78–030, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires. 

Polyester Resin ............................... EPA–450/3–83–008, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density 

Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins. 

EPA–450/3–83–006, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment. 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing.EPA–450/3–84–015, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

EPA–450/4–91–031, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners .... EPA–450/3–82–009, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners. 

Section III.D. of the preamble to EPA’s 

proposed rule to implement the 2008 

NAAQS (78 FR 34178, June 6, 2013) 

states in part that ‘‘RACT SIPs must 

contain adopted RACT regulations, 

certifications where appropriate that 

existing provisions are RACT, and/or 

negative declarations that there are no 

sources in the nonattainment area 

covered by a specific CTG source 

category.’’ We proposed to approve 

VCAPCD’s 2014 RACT SIP and negative 

declarations because we determined 

that they complied with the relevant 

CAA requirements and the RACT SIP 

requirements discussed in EPA’s 

proposed rule to implement the 2008 

NAAQS for ozone. Our proposed action 

contains more information on the 

submitted document and our 

evaluation. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

EPA’s proposed action provided a 30- 

day public comment period. During this 

period, we received no comments. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted. 

Therefore, as authorized in section 

110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully 

approving this document, including the 

negative declarations into the California 

SIP. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2018 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 

5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by March 16, 2015. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: December 12, 2014. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(449) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(449) New and amended regulations 

for the following APCDs were submitted 

on July 18, 2014 by the Governor’s 

designee. 

(i) [Reserved] 

(ii) Additional material. 

(A) Ventura County Air Pollution 

Control District. 

(1) Reasonably Available Control 

Technology State Implementation Plan 

Revision (2014 RACT SIP) as adopted 

on June 10, 2014 (‘‘2014 RACT SIP’’). 

■ 3. Section 52.222 is amended by: 

■ a. In paragraph (a)(10)(i), removing 

‘‘(i)’’ and adding in its place ‘‘(i)’’; and 

■ b. Adding paragraph (a)(10)(ii). 

The addition reads as follows: 

§ 52.222 Negative declarations. 

(a) * * * 

(10) * * * 

(ii) Negative declarations for the 2008 

8-hour ozone standard: EPA–453/R–97– 

004 Aerospace CTG and MACT; EPA– 

450/2–77–008 Control of Volatile 

Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources—Volume II: Surface 

Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, 

Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks; 

EPA 453/R–08–006 Control Techniques 

Guidelines for Automobile and LightDuty Truck Assembly Coatings; EPA– 

450/2–78–032, Control of Volatile 

Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources—Volume VII: 

Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood 

Paneling; EPA–453/R–06–004, Control 

Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood 

Paneling Coatings; EPA–453/R–06–003 

Control Techniques Guidelines for 

Flexible Package Printing; EPA–450/2– 

77–034 Control of Volatile Organic 

Emissions from Existing Stationary 

Sources—Volume V: Surface Coating of 

Large Appliances; EPA 453/R–07–004 

Control Techniques Guidelines for Large 

Appliance Coatings; EPA–450/2–77–033 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions 

from Existing Stationary Sources— 

Volume IV: Surface Coating of 

Insulation of Magnet Wire; EPA–450/2– 

77–032 Control of Volatile Organic 

Emissions from Existing Stationary 

Sources—Volume III: Surface Coating of 

Metal Furniture; EPA 453/R–07–005 

Control Techniques Guidelines for 

Metal Furniture Coatings; EPA 453/R– 

07–003 Control Techniques Guidelines 

for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; EPA– 

450/2–77–025 Control of Refinery 

Vacuum Producing Systems, 

Wastewater Separators, and Process 

Unit Turnarounds; EPA–450/2–78–036 

Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Leaks from Petroleum Refinery 

Equipment; EPA 453/R–08–004 Control 

Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass 

Boat Manufacturing Materials; EPA 453/ 

R–08–005 Control Techniques 

Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial 

Adhesives; EPA–450/2–78–029 Control 

of Volatile Organic Emissions from 

Manufacture of Synthesized 

Pharmaceutical Products; EPA–450/2– 

78–030 Control of Volatile Organic 

Emissions from Manufacture of 

Pneumatic Rubber Tires; EPA–450/3– 

83–008 Control of Volatile Organic 

Compound Emissions from Manufacture 

of High-Density Polyethylene, 

Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins; 

EPA–450/3–83–006 Control of Volatile 

Organic Compound Leaks from 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer 

and Resin Manufacturing Equipment; 

EPA–450/3–84–015 Control of Volatile 

Organic Compound Emissions from Air 

Oxidation Processes in Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

Industry; EPA–450/4–91–031 Control of 

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

from Reactor Processes and Distillation 

Operations in Synthetic Organic 

Chemical Manufacturing Industry; EPA– 

450/3–82–009 Control of Volatile 

Organic Compound Emissions from 

Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners were 

submitted on July 18, 2014 and adopted 

on June 10, 2014. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–00011 Filed 1–14–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Defense Acquisition Regulations 

System 

48 CFR Parts 212, 225, and 245 

Defense Federal Acquisition 

Regulation Supplement; Technical 

Amendments 

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition 

Regulations System, Department of 

Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical 

amendments to the Defense Federal 

Acquisition Regulation Supplement 

(DFARS) to provide needed editorial 

changes. 

DATES: Effective January 15, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Manuel Quinones, Defense Acquisition 

Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) 

DPAP (DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 

Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 

20301–3060. Telephone 571–372–6088; 

facsimile 571–372–6094. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final 

rule amends the DFARS as follows: 

1. Revises the format and presentation 

of the list of solicitation provisions and 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES