alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Filed 5/4/22 P. v. Crotti CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALESSANDRO ENRICO CROTTI,

Defendant and Appellant.

C094661

(Super. Ct. No. CR20211698)

Appointed counsel for defendant Alessandro Enrico Crotti has asked this court to 

conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable 

issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Having reviewed the record 

as required by Wende, we find no arguable errors that are favorable to defendant. 

Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Over the course of approximately three weeks, defendant robbed three different 

banks, obtaining a total of over $30,000. After being charged with 10 counts of robbery 
2

(Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5 subd. (c)),1 and one count of attempted robbery (§§ 212.5, 213

subd. (b)) defendant pleaded no contest to three counts of robbery; counts 2, 7, and 9. 

The remaining charges were dismissed with a Harvey2 waiver. As part of the plea, 

defendant agreed to an aggregate stipulated sentence of six years, including the upper 

term of five years on count 2, a concurrent term of 3 years on count 7, and a consecutive 

one-year term on count 9.

After the plea and prior to sentencing, defendant made a Marsden3 motion. The 

trial court denied the motion and proceeded to sentencing. The trial court sentenced 

defendant to an aggregate term of six years, awarded him 96 days of presentence custody 

credit and ordered him to pay $50,255 in direct victim restitution.

The trial court granted defendant’s request for a certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to 

review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of his right 

to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. 

More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief.

We have undertaken an examination of the entire record and find no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

1

 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2

 People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754.

3

 People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118.
3

 \s\ ,

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

We concur:

 \s\ ,

ROBIE, J.

 \s\ ,

DUARTE, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5493 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5493

 To direct the Librarian of Congress to ensure that each version of a 
     bill or resolution which is made available for viewing on the 
Congress.gov website is presented in a manner which permits the viewer 
to follow and track online, within the same document, any changes made 
           from previous versions of the bill or resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2016

  Ms. Stefanik (for herself and Mr. Messer) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Librarian of Congress to ensure that each version of a 
     bill or resolution which is made available for viewing on the 
Congress.gov website is presented in a manner which permits the viewer 
to follow and track online, within the same document, any changes made 
           from previous versions of the bill or resolution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Establishing Digital Interactive 
Transparency Act'' or the ``EDIT Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING VIEWERS TO TRACK CHANGES MADE TO BILLS AND 
              RESOLUTIONS MADE AVAILABLE ON CONGRESS.GOV WEBSITE.

    (a) Requirements for Website.--In the operation of the Congress.gov 
website, the Librarian of Congress shall ensure that each version of a 
bill or resolution which is made available for viewing on the website 
is presented in a manner which permits the viewer to follow and track 
online, within the same document, any changes made from previous 
versions of the bill or resolution.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect upon the 
expiration of the 1-year period which begins on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

November 14, 2005
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020321EN.01004301.xml

| 29.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/43

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9695 – LVMH/Tiffany)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 321/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (France), |
| --- | --- |

—

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (France),

| — | Tiffany & Co. (USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

Tiffany & Co. (USA).

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Tiffany & Co.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE: active worldwide in the manufacture and supply of luxury goods through a portfolio of 75 brands in the following areas: (i) wines and spirits; (ii) fashion and leather goods; (iii) perfumes and cosmetics; (iv) watches and jewellery; and (v) selective retailing, |
| --- | --- |

—

for LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE: active worldwide in the manufacture and supply of luxury goods through a portfolio of 75 brands in the following areas: (i) wines and spirits; (ii) fashion and leather goods; (iii) perfumes and cosmetics; (iv) watches and jewellery; and (v) selective retailing,

| — | for Tiffany & Co.: active worldwide in the design, production, and distribution of luxury jewellery, and associated products. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Tiffany & Co.: active worldwide in the design, production, and distribution of luxury jewellery, and associated products.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9695 — LVMH/Tiffany

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - products_web_tools(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(14)
              - alaska(74)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(28)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(152)
              - colorado(79)
              - connecticut(17)
              - delaware(11)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(36)
              - georgia(18)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(80)
              - idaho(24)
              - illinois(4)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(21)
              - maine(17)
              - maryland(17)
              - massachusetts(27)
              - michigan(14)
              - minnesota(20)
              - mississippi(16)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(20)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(23)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(17)
              - new york(61)
              - north carolina(29)
              - north dakota(7)
              - (-)ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(6)
              - oregon(32)
              - pennsylvania(15)
              - puerto rico(19)
              - rhode island(14)
              - south carolina(11)
              - south dakota(39)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(15)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(31)
              - vermont(9)
              - virginia(25)
              - washington(54)
              - west virginia(7)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(36)

## By Year

publication        February 23, 2021        Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: A history of change

publication        January 1, 2000        Stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios for selected sites of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring Network (AIRMoN)

publication        February 16, 2018        Spatial patterns and temporal changes in atmospheric-mercury deposition for the midwestern USA, 2001–2016

Project        March 23, 2017        Investigations and Monitoring of Mercury in Indiana

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper

publication        June 1, 2000        The potential for calcium depletion in forest ecosystems of southeastern United States: Review and analysis

Center News        May 5, 2020        Winter 2020 Newsletter
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - (-)washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
Exhibit 99.3

               Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, Gaylen M. Brotherson, state and attest that:

(1)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports of
     M.B.A. Holdings, Inc., and, except as corrected or supplemented in a
     subsequent covered report:

     *    no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material fact as
          of the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
          report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of the date on
          which it was filed); and

     *    no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements in the covered report, in light of the circumstances
          under which they were made, not misleading as of the end of the period
          covered by such report (or in the case of a report on Form 8-K or
          definitive proxy materials, as of the date on which it was filed).

(2)  I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's Audit
     Committee.

(3)  In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or before
     the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

     *    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. for the year ended
          October 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
          File Number 1-9183,

     *    all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all definitive
          proxy materials of M.B.A. Holdings, Inc. filed with the Commission
          subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K identified above; and

     *    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

By: /s/ Gaylen M. Brotherson
----------------------------
Gaylen M. Brotherson
March 6, 2003
                                              Subscribed and sworn to before me
                                              this 6th day of March 2003.

                                              /s/ Shelly Beesley
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Notary Public
                                              My Commission Expires:
                                              September 30, 2003
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - (-)news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        December 14, 2021        Rivers in the Sky: 6 Facts You Should Know about Atmospheric Rivers

Featured Story        February 22, 2017        Stormy weather: How the USGS goes to work monitoring its effects

Featured Story        March 2, 2023        Climate Warming is Likely to Cause Large Increases in Wetland Methane Emissions

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat

Featured Story        August 12, 2022        Massive Volcanic Eruption and Tsunami Informs Plan for Future Eruptions, Sea-level Rise

Featured Story        May 27, 2015        Pathways to the Abyss

Featured Story        September 14, 2016        Comprehensive Study finds Widespread Mercury Contamination Across Western North America

Featured Story        May 6, 2019        The National Volcano Early Warning System (NVEWS) will help USGS better monitor nation’s most dangerous volcanoes
Anthony LAMBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-568

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Sergio Samuel BAKAS, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 21, 2020

No. 04-19-00319-CR

Shy Angelo CASARES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR1070

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. 

Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided appellant with

a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no

pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in this appeal, he must do so within thirty days 

from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se 

brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date appellant’s pro 

se brief is filed in this court. We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel in 

this appeal, to be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of January, 2020.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Terence M. MCCLAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1442

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Melvin I. KAYSER, Jr., and Sharon M. Striker Kayser, Appellants, v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ronny LANDINGIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 25, 2018

Brett Spencer Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Robert Quentin Humphrey, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*1290DENIED . *See**Hart v. State* , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1232, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 2472451 (Fla. 1st DCA June 4, 2018).

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Rowe and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Michael JULIUS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
St()-l()0S24-()().^ 

Cutnberlanb Countp Hegitflatibe Belesation 

iioitl^ Carolina ^enrral ^atmblp 

ilaleigli. i^rtli Carolina 27601 -1096 

C J 3 

•CD 

VJ 

> 

22 

21 

ieiepre^entatttie Xlitb 6Ia?ier. I^ouste 45 Slepredentatilie €Imer Jflopb. J^i t 

SLepretfetttatibe Harbin Intai, ^ouste 42 iClepresEentatitie ISPiKiam Hitiiitm, f^ouit 

l&epretfmtatibe Siane $arfitt, ^ousfe 44 Senator I.arr2> ftdain, Senate 

Senator ^rsart t ^igfyimitls J^ithum, denate 19 

August 18,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20S90 

The Cumberland County Legislative Delegation vnites to express strong support for the grant q>plication 

submitted by North Carolina's Fayetteville Regional Aiipon CFA Y) under the Small Community Air 

Service Development Progiam. New non-stop air service between Fayetteville and the Washington, DC 

area has been identified by our local community as a high-priority transportation requirement. A financial 

gram would help secure tlie commitment of a commercial airline to provide this important service. 

Demand for Washington, DC air service is being driven by mission growth at Fort Bragg related to the 

Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process. Under BRAC. Fort Bragg will add thousands of military 

personnel in the next few years. Of particular note, the U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) and 

Army Reserve Command (USARC) will transfer from Fort McPherson in Atlanta to Fort Bragg by 

September 2011. The additionotf these units will substantially increase the number of trips between Fort 

Bragg and Washington, DC both by the military and companies doing business with the Department of 

Defense. 

Located just 13.6 miles from Fort Bragg's main gate and within easy access of surrounding communities, 

Fayetteville Regional Airport is ideally positioned to accommodate the region's Washington, £>C travelers. 

Cinrently, the Fayetteville Regional Airport serves a I2-county area in the Sandhills of southern North 

Carolina and travelers in this market are forced to either drive 6 hours each way or fly via alternative 

airports. These options are neither efficient nor economical and present substantial obstacles to 

maximizing the economic potential of the BRAC process in the Fayetteville region. 

The Delegation respectfully asks that the highest consideration is given to the Fayetteville Regional 

Airport's grant application in order to improve access to Washington, DC for the benefit of military, 

business and leisure travelers alike.. 

Sincerely, 

Rep. RicIiXinzier, Chair Kejp. Ebner Floya>Vi<!'e ChMT ^ 

^^ep . MapriivLuctB-^ ^n . LanyShaw ^Rep, . . William Bnsson 

^ Rep. Diane Parfitl^ Sen. Mai^BjAet H. Dickson