alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Curtis Orgil, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
     Communication Systems, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Universal Communication
     Systems, Inc. and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2004                 By: /s/ Curtis Orgil
                                        -----------------------
                                        Curtis Orgil
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Anthony PARKS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. EXCEL RENT A CAR, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-0805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Netparts.com, Inc. , now renamed Turner Valley Oil & Gas, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Christopher Paton-Gay , president/director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 17, 2003    /s/ Christopher Paton-Gay
 Christopher Paton-Gay
 president director
81 West 1st South

Snowflake, Arizona 85937

Dear Mayor Willis:

Thank you for your interest in Arizona’s plan to address regional haze in protected national parks and

wilderness areas as required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). We are responding to your letter dated July

19, 2012, requesting an extension ofthe public comment period and additional hearings.

We agree to extend the deadline for public comment and increase the number ofpublic hearings to

provide additional opportunity for review and comment on the regional haze plan for three power plants

in Arizona (Apache Generating Station, Cholla Power Plant and Coronado Generating Station.)

We will conduct two additional public hearings. On August 14, 2012, we will hold an additional hearing

in Holbrook, Arizona at Holbrook High School, George Gardner Performing Arts Center, 455 N. 8thAve. from 6-8 PM. Note that EPA has changed the location from Northland Pioneer College in order to

accommodate more people. On August 15, 2012, we will hold a hearing in Benson, Arizona, at Cochise

College (Rooms 113 and 115) from 6-8 PM. These two hearings are in addition to the public hearing

held in Phoenix on July 31, 2012.

We have extended the public comment period by two weeks, for a total of 60 days ending on September

18, 2012, but are unable to provide the 90 days that you requested. We are on an expedited schedule to

review and respond to all public comments and to prepare a final determination by the consent decree

deadline ofNovember 15, 2012. We did request more time from the litigants but were unsuccessful.

We look forward to working with you and other interested parties to address regional haze affecting

national parks and wilderness areas. If you have further questions, please contact Colleen McKaughan,

Associate Director at 520-498-0118.

Sincerely,

//2

IDeborahdordan

Director, Air Division

Printed on Recycled Paper
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EVELYN GARZA, Individually and on 

Behalf of RUBEN ROBERTO GARZA, 

Deceased, MALORIE ELISSA GARZA, 

VALERIE MARIE GARZA, and ALICE 

HERNANDEZ GARZA, 

Appellants,

v.

RDL ENERGY SERVICES, LP,

RDL ENERGY, LLC and

JPH HOLDINGS, LLC,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00044-CV

Appeal from the

112th Judicial District Court

of Crockett County, Texas

(TC# 19-02-07955-CV)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that 

part of the judgment finding that Adrian Darius Samuel was not in the course and scope of his 

employment at the time of the accident. We therefore reverse that part of the trial court’s judgment.

We affirm the motions for summary judgment as to the negligent entrustment claim for RDL 

Energy Services, LP, RDL Energy, LLC and JPH Holdings, LLC.

We further order that Appellants recover from Appellees and their sureties, if any, for 

performance of the judgment and all costs of appeal, for which let execution issue. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5. This decision shall be certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**771 KA 14-00093** 
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MAXWELL B. MOHAWK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SUSAN C. MINISTERO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered July 1, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]). As a preliminary matter, we agree with defendant that “ ‘the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because the minimal inquiry made by [County Court] was insufficient to establish that the court engage[d him] in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” ( People v
Benson , 141 AD3d 1171, 1172; see People v Cooper , 136 AD3d 1397, 1398, lv denied 27 NY3d 1067). Defendant contends that the court abused its discretion in refusing to grant him youthful offender status. We note that we would address that contention even in the presence of a valid waiver of the right to appeal because the issue was specifically excluded from the purported waiver ( see People v Johnson , 50 AD3d 1567, 1567). We nonetheless conclude that defendant’s contention is without merit. The court properly considered the gravity of the offense, i.e., defendant shot the victim multiple times in the upper torso, which caused serious, life-threatening injuries, as well as defendant’s lack of remorse ( see People v Gibson , 134 AD3d 1517, 1518- 1519, lv denied 27 NY3d 1069; People v Driggs , 24 AD3d 888, 889). Furthermore, upon our review of the record, we see no reason to exercise our own discretion in the interest of justice to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender ( cf. People v Amir W. , 107 AD3d 1639, 1640-1641). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: September 30, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1813

___________ John Reed, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Home Depot USA, Inc., a Delaware * corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 2004 Filed: December 10, 2004

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John Reed appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII employment-discrimination action against Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. (Home Depot). Reed, an African American, alleged Home Depot failed to promote him based on his race.2 The Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Reed failed to establish a prima facie failure-to-promote case. Among other things, he adduced no evidence that he had registered his interest for the promotions at issue in the computer-based Job Performance Program, as was required to be considered for those promotions. See Younts v. Fremont County, Iowa. , 370 F.3d 748, 754 (8th Cir. 2004) (elements of prima facie case of failure to promote); Wheeler v. Aventis Pharm. , 360 F.3d 853, 857 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Also, we reject Reed’s suggestions on appeal concerning judicial bias. Finally, we decline to consider Reed’s challenge to a magistrate judge’s 2denial of leave to amend to add new claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ending May 31,  2006 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Joseph
Batty,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: July 14, 2006


/s/ Joseph Batty
Joseph Batty
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of CNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jeffrey H. Noblin, President
and Chief Executive Officer and Elizabeth T. Beale, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, do each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This 30thday of March, 2010.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey H. Noblin  
|Jeffrey H. Noblin      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Elizabeth T. Beale 
|Elizabeth T. Beale     
|Chief Financial Officer



54
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZANN Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
E. Betts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 22, 2005

                                   /s/George E. Betts
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   George E. Betts, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay impact structure

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(81)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(6)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileJ. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

AIR RESOURCES DIVISION 

CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 

NOTICE OF PERMIT AND voe RACT ORDER REVIEW, OPPORTUNITY FOR 

PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD 

Pursuant to the New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Env-A 621.02, and Env-A 

1205.05, notice is hereby given that the Director of the New Hampshire Department of 

Environmental Services, Air Resources Division (Director), has received an application for a state 

permit to operate (draft permit) and VOC RACT Order (draft Order) from, and based on the 

information received to date, intends to issue such permit and Order to: 

Watts Regulator Co. 

583 South Main Street 

FrankJin 

For the Following Device(s): 

Foundry and Valve Manufacturing Operations 

The Order is being amended to incorporate updates to Env-A 1200; specifically VOC 

limits for Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating. The applications, draft permit, and 

draft Order are on file with the Director, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 

Air Resources Division, 29 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095, (603) 271-1370. 

Information may be reviewed at the office during working hours from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 

through Friday. The draft Order and draft permit can be accessed electronically through the OneStop Data and Information portal at http://www.des.nh.gov. Additional information may also be 

obtained by contacting Sheila Rydel at the above address and phone number. A request for a 

public hearing must specify whether the request is for the draft permit, draft RACT Order, or both 

and be received by the Director no later than Monday, August 17, 2015. A hearing request for the 

draft permit must be filed in accordance with Env-A 621.06. Written comments on the draft 

permit and/or draft Order must be received no later than Monday, August 17, 2015, shall be 

considered by the Director in making a final decision. 

Craig A. Wright 

Director 

Air Resources Division
ras-ex1019_611.htm



 

Exhibit 10.19 

NOTICE OF AMENDMENT

of Outstanding Grants under the RAIT Plans

Effective as of June 28, 2017

 

At RAIT Financial Trust’s (“RAIT”) 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, held on June 22, 2017, the shareholders of RAIT approved a proposal to amend and restate the RAIT Financial Trust 2012 Incentive Award Plan (the “2012 Plan”), including renaming the plan as the RAIT Financial Trust 2017 Incentive Award Plan (the “2017 Plan”), as described in RAIT’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2017, as supplemented on June 2, 2017 (collectively, the “Proxy Statement”).  

 

The 2017 Plan amended and restated the 2012 Plan to allow the Committee (as defined in the 2017 Plan) to permit a Participant (as defined in the 2017 Plan) to elect to satisfy RAIT’s tax withholding obligation with respect to grants paid in RAIT’s common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.03 (“Common Shares”), by having Common Shares withheld at the time such grants become taxable, up to an amount that does not exceed the Participant’s maximum (as opposed to minimum under the 2012 Plan) applicable withholding tax rate for federal (including FICA), state and local tax liabilities (collectively, “Tax Liabilities”), and the Committee has deemed it advisable to amend all outstanding grants previously made under the 2012 Plan (and any predecessor incentive award plans of RAIT) (collectively, the “RAIT Plans”) to permit such election at such maximum rate.

 

You are receiving this notice because you have received one or more grants (the “Outstanding Grants”) under the RAIT Plans that provide for settlement of such Outstanding Grants, in whole or in part, with Common Shares.  You are hereby notified that the Committee has amended all Outstanding Grants to permit you to elect to satisfy RAIT’s tax withholding obligation with respect to grants paid in Common Shares by having Common Shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value (as defined in the 2017 Plan) up to an amount that does not exceed your maximum applicable Tax Liabilities withheld at the time such grants become taxable. This amendment became effective as of the date set forth above.

 

As under the 2012 Plan, all withheld amounts are remitted by the Company to the appropriate taxing entity on your behalf, and you are still paid the balance of your Award.  This change in withholding does not impact or otherwise diminish the pre-tax or after-tax value of your Outstanding Grants, nor does it change your overall all tax obligation.  Rather, the change will simply result in greater withholding that will reduce your tax payment obligation (or increase your refund) when you file your tax returns.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Boulder Magnetic Observatory

Filters

              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - (-)2022(1)

Photography  Boulder Geomagnetic Observatory
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Wonder Auto Technology, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Qingjie Zhao, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Qingjie ZhaoQingjie
      Zhao
                President
      & Chief Executive Officer





March 30,
2009
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6069
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD M. PATTERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-60) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard M. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Richard M. Patterson appeals the district court’s orders denying his request for “a transcript of the return of the indictment hearing” and of a “transcript of the grand jury” and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeUnited States v. Patterson , No. CR-97-60 (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2002; Nov. 6, 2002). We also note that to the extent that Patterson seeks a transcript of sealed grand jury testimony, he has failed to demonstrate the “strong showing of partic ularized need” necessary to justify disclosure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3). United States v. Sells Eng’g, Inc. , 463 U.S. 418, 443 (1983). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED