alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2079

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JANE DOE, by and through her mother and natural Guardian ad Litem, Mary Roe; 

MARY ROE, individually,

 Defendants - Appellants,

and

ROSE WADFORD HUNTER,

 Defendant.

No. 19-1180

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JANE DOE, by and through her mother and natural Guardian ad Litem, Mary Roe; 

MARY ROE, individually,

 Defendants - Appellants,

and
2

ROSE WADFORD HUNTER,

 Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:17-cv-00384-DCN)

Submitted: January 17, 2020 Decided: January 30, 2020

Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron E. Edwards, Lawrence E. Richter, Jr., THE RICHTER FIRM, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, 

South Carolina, for Appellants. A. Johnston Cox, Janice Holmes, GALLIVAN, WHITE 

& BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Mary Roe and Jane Doe (collectively, “Roe/Doe”) appeal the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment to Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company 

(“Allstate”). The district court concluded that Allstate had no duty to defend or indemnify 

Roe/Doe’s claims against Joseph Stephen Hunter, Sr., who allegedly sexually abused Jane 

Doe for nearly 10 years, and Rose Wadford Hunter, who Roe/Doe claim knew of and failed 

to prevent the abuse. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. 

Roe/Doe do not dispute the district court’s findings as to Joseph Hunter; they 

challenge only the court’s grant of summary judgment on their negligence, breach of 

fiduciary duty, and defamation claims against Rose Hunter. The district court properly 

accepted Roe/Doe’s factual allegations from the underlying state complaint and granted 

summary judgment applying settled state law. The court also correctly held that Allstate 

had no duty to defend and indemnify Roe/Doe’s defamation claims against Rose Hunter, 

since Roe/Doe themselves alleged that Rose Hunter’s actions were intentional. See

Miller v. Fid.-Phx. Ins. Co., 231 S.E.2d 701, 702 (S.C. 1977). Finally, the district court 

correctly held that Allstate had no duty to defend and indemnify Roe/Doe’s negligence 

claims against Rose Hunter, based on the South Carolina Supreme Court’s conclusion that 

“the Hunter policy unambiguously denies coverage to Rose Hunter where Joseph Hunter 

has been barred from coverage.” Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co. v. Hunter, 

821 S.E.2d 493, 494 (S.C. 2018) (alterations omitted). 
4

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: CASE NO.: 21-20266-BKC-RAM

CHAPTER 13

KEVIN HILL

 Debtor. /

 

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE 

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR:

THIS IS AN OBJECTION TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority 

status of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to 

identify which claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. 

Upon the filing of this objection an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled 

on the date already scheduled for the confirmation hearing in accordance with Local 

Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the debtor objects to 

the following claim filed in this case*:

Claim 

No. 

Claimant Amount Basis for Objection and 

Recommended Disposition 

2-1 United States 

Department of 

Education c/o 

Nelnet

$143,218.12 This student loan is in a 

forbearance/deferment outside the plan; 

therefore, the claim should be ALLOWED 

but NOT ENTITLED TO DISTRIBUTION 

FROM THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE. 

*Notwithstanding the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 3007, up to five objections 

to claim may be included in one pleading. (See Local Rule 3007-1(C).)

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this 

objection will be served on the claimant and the debtor and that a certificate of service 

conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the court when the objection and 

notice of hearing are served.

Case 21-20266-RAM Doc 27 Filed 01/20/22 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in the court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

Law Offices of Daryl L. Jones, P.A.

Attorney for Debtor

14707 South Dixie Hwy., Suite 101

Miami, FL 33176

Tel: 305-969-3602

Fax: 305-969-3469

DJones@DLJonesLaw.com

AMelich@DLJonesLaw.com

By: /s/Aimee Melich, Esq.

 Daryl L. Jones, Esq./FBN.: 742589

 Aimee Melich, Esq./FBN.: 95066

Case 21-20266-RAM Doc 27 Filed 01/20/22 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)

Satellite imagery        December 4, 2015        Titan Cassini VIMS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Lloyd
H. Malchow, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SenoRx, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SenoRx, Inc.




Date:
      November 3, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Lloyd H. MalchowName:
            Lloyd
      H. MalchowTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer




I, Kevin
J. Cousins, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SenoRx, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SenoRx, Inc.




Date:
      November 3, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Kevin J. CousinsName:
            Kevin
      J. CousinsTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LLOYD RICHARDSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 226 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LLOYD RICHARDSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 227 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
##### 



Exhibit 10.23 Second Amendment to the Trizec Properties, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan WHEREAS, Trizec Properties, Inc. (the Company) has adopted the Trizec Properties, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended by the first amendment thereto dated May 4, 2004 (the
Plan); and WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended by the Board of
Directors of the Company (the Board), and the Board has approved and adopted this amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the Company amends the Plan, effective August 3, 2004, in the following
respects: 1. Section 4.6(d) shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following: Interest. Each Account shall be increased or decreased by the Interest credited
to such Account since the prior Determination Date as though the balance of that Account
had been invested in the applicable Valuation Funds chosen by the Participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the
Company, this 3rd day of August, 2004. TRIZEC PROPERTIES, INC./s/ Ted R. JadwinName:
    Ted R. JadwinTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
Lee Robert SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-613

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AUDIO VIDEO COMMUNICATION STORE, INC., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BASKETBALL PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismiss.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

              - 2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

Reference Materials        October 1, 2018        Report of the IAU Working Group
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00561

- CV
In the interest of V. E. M., a Child
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. F

- 2877

- 04

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. Febuary 13, 2014
Antonio GOULD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2064

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Charlie J. COSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020132EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/13 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9822 – Bridgepoint/Groupe Financière CEP)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 132/10)

1.

On 14 April 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020132EN.01001301-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bridgepoint SAS (‘Bridgepoint’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Groupe Financière CEP and its subsidiaries (‘CEP’, France). |

Bridgepoint acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of CEP.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of securities.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bridgepoint: a private equity investment firm that, via its subsidiaries, manages and advises a number of investment funds with direct or indirect shareholdings in many operating companies worldwide, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CEP: a group active mainly in credit insurance brokerage and mortgage credit brokerage. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020132EN.01001301-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9822 – Bridgepoint/Groupe Financière CEP

Observations can be sent to the Commission by e-mail, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020132EN.01001301-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020132EN.01001301-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

slideshow        December 22, 2022        Desert, aquatic, prairie, forest, riparian, tundra, and sagebrush plants

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
IceWEB, Inc. for the interim period ended June 30, 2006, I, John R. Signorello,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IceWEB, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of IceWEB, Inc. fully complies
with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of IceWEB, Inc. fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of IceWEB, Inc.

Dated: August 21, 2006                  By: /s/ John R. Signorello
                                            ----------------------
                                            John R. Signorello
                                            Chairman and CEO,
                                            Principal Financial Officer
Paul Frederick MAGEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-839

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Sean Kevin Gravel, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Paul Frederick Magee appeals the final order entered by the post-conviction court summarily denying his motion seeking post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motion raised four grounds for relief, and all were denied by the post-conviction court. On appeal, Magee challenges the summary denial of the first and third grounds, arguing they were facially sufficient and warranted an evidentiary hearing. We affirm as to the court's denial of the first ground; however, we reverse as to the denial of the third ground. On remand, the post-conviction court must either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record which conclusively refute Magee's ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised in ground three. *See**Nelson v. State*, 73 So.3d 77, 84 (Fla. 2011).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

PALMER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Raptor
Networks Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Bob van Leyen, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 20, 2007                             /s/  Bob van Leyen
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Bob van Leyen
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (principal financial officer)


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.