alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(60)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - (-)arizona(3)
              - california(24)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        February 22, 2018        Ungulates in a Warmer Climate

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Presentations and Events        March 25, 2021        PubTalk 3/2021 - A Jaguar's Field of Dreams
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(82)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_image(12)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_video(30)
              - multimedia_video-149194(28)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - (-)california(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        February 22, 2017        Stormy weather: How the USGS goes to work monitoring its effects
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: DED

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(7)
              - connecticut(1)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 30, 2023        PubTalk-03/2023: Coral Reef in Crisis - Science to Guide Reef Restoration for Ecosystem Recovery
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131653(47)(52) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. BARBARA GEARY, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 131653 COA: 267105 Kalamazoo CC: 02-000639-NI C & K MUFFLERS, INC., d/b/a MAXI MUFFLER and CHARLES L. FINNEY, Defendants-Appellees,

and

SECURA INSURANCE COMPANY, Garnishee Defendant-Appellant,

and

RINELLE SIMPSON and KR ISTY J. FINNEY, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Cour t’s November 29, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
Gregory L. LAVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael CUMMINGS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0591

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE EX REL. Kevin D. SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1073

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Laboratory electrical resistivity analysis of geologic samples from Fort Irwin, California      

      March 5, 2015    

View Report

Correlating laboratory resistivity measurements with geophysical resistivity models helps constrain these models to the geology and lithology of an area. Throughout the Fort Irwin National Training Center area, 111 samples from both cored boreholes and surface outcrops were collected and processed for laboratory measurements. These samples represent various lithologic types that include plutonic and metamorphic (basement) rocks, lava flows, consolidated sedimentary rocks, and unconsolidated sedimentary deposits that formed in a series of intermountain basins. Basement rocks, lava flows, and some lithified tuffs are generally resistive (≥100 ohm-meters [Ω·m]) when saturated. Saturated unconsolidated samples are moderately conductive to conductive, with resistivities generally less than 100 Ω·m, and many of these samples are less than 50 Ω·m. The unconsolidated samples can further be separated into two broad groups: (1) younger sediments that are moderately conductive, owing to their limited clay content, and (2) older, more conductive sediments with a higher clay content that reflects substantial amounts of originally glassy volcanic ash subsequently altered to clay. The older sediments are believed to be Tertiary. Time-domain electromagnetic (TEM) data were acquired near most of the boreholes, and, on the whole, close agreements between laboratory measurements and resistivity models were found. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

#### David C Buesch

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

dbuesch@usgs.gov

650-439-2634

## Related Content

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

#### David C Buesch

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

dbuesch@usgs.gov

650-439-2634

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


John R. Valaas, Chief Executive Officer, and Roger A. Mandery, Chief Financial
Officer, of First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.   the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
     (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 6, 2005

                                            By /s/  John R. Valaas
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               John R. Valaas
                                               President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                            By /s/  Roger A. Mandery
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Roger A. Mandery
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(68)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(24)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 30, 2023        PubTalk-03/2023: Coral Reef in Crisis - Science to Guide Reef Restoration for Ecosystem Recovery
EXHIBIT 99-2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Securities & Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on FORM 10-QSB for Microbest, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, (the"Report") as filed today
with the Securities & Exchange Commission, we, the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our
knowledge and belief that:

      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company, and the results of its
      operations and its cash flows.

The Report has been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going
concern. As described in the Report, the Company among other things has an
ongoing deficit in working capital, and has suffered cumulative losses from
operations since inception. All of this raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Management recognizes that the realization of assets and the satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business is dependent upon the Company
obtaining additional equity capital and ultimately generating profitable
operations. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in
these activities. Should the Company not be successful in these activities, it
will have a materially negative affect on the financial information contained in
the Report.


August 14, 2002                      /s/
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     William J. Breslin, Chief Financial Officer


Suscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, this 14th day of August, 2002
by William J. Breslin known to me to be the chief financial officer of
Microbest, Inc.

My commission expires_________       /s/
                                     -------------------------------------------

                                  Notary Public
Consent to Assignment and Assumption of Standstill Agreement.



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION 
 This CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION is made as of
June 4, 2007, by and between Spark Networks plc, a public limited company registered in England and Wales under number 3628907 whose registered office is located at 24-26 Arcadia Avenue, Finchley Central, London N3 2JU, England (the
“Company”), and Great Hill Equity Partners II, Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited liability company whose registered office is located at One Liberty Square Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (“Shareholder”). All
capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined in this Consent to Assignment and Assumption shall have the meanings set forth in the Standstill Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005 (the “Standstill Agreement”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Shareholder entered into the Standstill Agreement whereby Shareholder agreed not to take certain actions during, and
subsequent to, the Fourteen Month Period; 
 WHEREAS, the Company intends to reorganize by way of a scheme of arrangement (the
“Scheme”) whereby it will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Spark Networks, Inc., a newly formed Delaware company (“Spark-Delaware”), all outstanding shares of the Company will be cancelled and the holders of the
Company will become stockholders of Spark-Delaware; and 
 WHEREAS, in connection with the Scheme, Spark-Delaware, as the Company’s
successor and assign, will assume the Standstill Agreement. 
 NOW, THREFORE, 
 1. Consent. Shareholder hereby consents to the assignment and assumption by Spark-Delaware of the Standstill Agreement, which will occur in connection with, and on the effective date of, the Scheme, and agrees
that all provisions of the Standstill Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Spark-Delaware. 
 2. No New Periods. The parties
agree that this Consent to Assignment and Assumption does not reset any periods in the Standstill Agreement and that the determination of any period, including the Fourteenth Period, shall be based on the terms and date of the Standstill Agreement.

 3. No Violation. The parties agree that Shareholder’s participation in the Scheme shall not be deemed a violation of the terms of the
Standstill Agreement. 
 4. Miscellaneous. Article 6 of the Standstill Agreement is herein incorporated by this reference, including, but not limited
to, the sections regarding Governing Law and Counterparts. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Consent to Assignment and Assumption to be duly
executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	Spark Networks plc
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mark Thompson
	Name:	 	Mark Thompson
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


  

			
	Great Hill Equity Partners II, Limited Partnership
		
	By:	 	Great Hill Partners GP II, LLC, its general partner
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Kumin
	Name:	 	Michael Kumin
	Title:	 	Authorized Signatory


  

 - 2 -
CAS-RM-78-110 COMMENT 15

900 Federal Registsi" I Vol. 55, No. 8 I Thursday, January 11, 1990 I Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Conservation and

Renewable Energy

10 ern Part 430

iDoduit No. CA8-RM-78-1 10)

Energy ConservatiOn Program for .

Consumer Products; Final RulemaJdng

Regarding Regulations Related to

Energy Conservation Standards for

Consumer Products; Correction

AGENCY: Department ofEnergy. <

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: In the role document ._

pu'Llished in the Federal Register of

Februl:lry 7.1989 (54 FR,6062). please

make the following correction. On page

6074. the amendatory language for

§ 430.2 should read as set forth below:

3. Section 430.2 is amended by

revi~ing the definitions of "Act"•. "FurnCice", "Secretary", and "Water

heater"; removing the definitions of

"AClminisfralot" and "E:.'1ergy effiCiency

starid.:ll'd": L,~ertfug the word "energy"

in place of the last five words in the .. definition for "Packaged terminal air

conditioner"; and adding the following.

definitions in alphabetical order.

EFFECTlVEDATE: March 9, 1989.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATIOMCONTACT:

MichaelJ. McCabe. (20Z) 5S6-9127.

Issued in Washington, DC, December 29.

1989.

J. Michael Davis,

Assistant Secretary, Conservation and

Renewable Energy.

[FR Doc. 90-589 Filed 1-10-90; IM5 am}

8lWHG COO£ M$IHl'1-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4822-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Nebraska (FEMA-4822-DR), dated September 24, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued October 23, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this declared disaster is now June 19 to July 8, 2024.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially                               ( print page 97020)                            Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-28635 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
STATE EX REL. Kenton Dawne GREEN v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1160

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - montana(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 16, 2020        Comet NEOWISE and the Roosevelt Arch at Yellowstone National Park

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic
STATE EX REL. Jonathan JONES v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1216

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the amended  quarterly report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2006,
as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  May 31, 2006                      s/George Suzuki
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          George Suzuki, Chief Executive Officer
STATE EX REL. Yutico BRILEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0982

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La.

*895Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
STATE of Louisiana v. Eric Dominic NABORS

NO. 2018-K-1477

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.