alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TECHNICAL REPORT DATA (Please read Instructions on reverse before completing) 1. REPORT NO. 

### EPA-452/R-02-010 2. 3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 

### Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan 5. REPORT DATE 

### October 2002 (date of issue) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 

### Rebecca Battye, Darcie Smith and Stephanie J. Walsh 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. 

### EC/R Project No. ITP - 106
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 

### EC/R Incorporated 1129 Weaver Dairy Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO. 

### 68D - 00 - 208 Work Assignment No. 1 - 6 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 

### Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 

### Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE 

### EPA/200/04
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 

### EPA Project Officer: Julie McClintock, Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division 16. ABSTRACT 

### This document was written to help tribal environmental staff. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Tribal Authority Rule [see 63 Federal Register 7254] says that Indian tribes that meet certain eligibility requirements can develop implementation plans for national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The EPA has established NAAQS for six air pollutants, particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and lead. The document discusses air quality management in general, the information and benefits that tribes should consider before developing implementation plans, the elements of state and tribal implementation plans, the regional haze program, emission inventories, air quality monitoring, enforcement program considerations, and what should be submitted to EPA with a TIP.

17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS a. DESCRIPTORS b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS c. COSATI Field/Group 

### National ambient air quality standards Regional haze Emission inventory Monitoring Enforcement Air Pollution control Tribal air programs

18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT 

### Release Unlimited 19. SECURITY CLASS (Report) 

### Unclassified 21. NO. OF PAGES 

### 100 20. SECURITY CLASS (Page) 

### Unclassified 22. PRICE **EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)** PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETEUnited States Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Publication No. EPA 452/R-02-010

Environmental Protection Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division October 2002 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC Postal information in this section where appropriate.
Carl ENGLAND v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2017-CI-1006

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
Kenya WHITELY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1035

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer 34
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-FalconeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2007
# C_2020044EN.01000101.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9594 — CMA CGM/CIMC Neocontainer/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 44/01)

On 30 January 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2020098EN.01000601.xml

| 25.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9424 — NVIDIA/Mellanox)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 98/06)

On 19 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9424. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9424. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Jose TORRES, Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustee FOR the CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-26, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 22, 2018]

Kendrick Almaguer and Peter Ticktin of The Ticktin Law Group, P.L.L.C., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

J. Kirby McDonough of Quarles & Brady, LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Jose Torres ("the homeowner") appeals an order denying his motion for attorneys' fees and costs rendered in favor of the Bank of New York as Trustee ("the bank") following an involuntary dismissal of the bank's foreclosure action. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

First, we affirm the denial of attorneys' fees. Because the homeowner prevailed on an argument that the bank failed to prove entitlement to enforce the note and mortgage, the homeowner cannot now seek to take advantage of the fee provisions of the note and mortgage. *See**Sabido v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon* , 238 So.3d 867, 868-69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) ; *Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Glass* , 219 So.3d 896, 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), *review granted* , No. SC17-1387, 2018 WL 2069328 (Fla. Feb. 13, 2018).

However, we reverse the denial of costs. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420 provides in relevant part, "Costs in any action dismissed under this rule shall be assessed and judgment for costs entered in that action, once the action is concluded as to the party seeking taxation of costs." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(d) ; *see also* § 57.041(1), Fla. Stat. (2017) ("The party recovering judgment shall recover all his or her legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment ...."). Because the case was involuntarily dismissed, the homeowner is entitled to taxable costs.

In this situation, any costs awardable to the homeowner flow from rule 1.420 and not from the subject mortgage and/or note.

We therefore remand for the trial court to consider what costs should be awarded as authorized by the Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions.1

*Affirmed in part; reversed in part.*

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Ciklin, JJ., concur.

1

Fla. R. Civ. P. Taxation of Costs.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) of UTEK
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: May 9, 2006     



Page 35 of 35
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Quarterly Report of ATNG Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Robert C. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 25, 2004.

                                   By  /s/Robert C. Simpson
                                     -------------------------------------
                                       Robert C. Simpson,
                                       Chief Executive Officer of
                                       ATNG Inc.


<PAGE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of D.D.E., a child, * From the 118th District Court

of Martin County,

Trial Court No. 7356.

No. 11-21-00069-CV * October 7, 2021

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

The undersigned, Rick Jesky, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of Pinoak, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  March 29, 2004

                                           /s/ Rick Jesky
                                           ------------------------
                                               Rick Jesky
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of The
Neptune Society, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here
of (the Report), I, Daniel M. Solberg, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  November 21, 2005 | By:   /s/ Daniel M. Solberg
       Daniel M. Solberg
       Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b)

and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



I, J. Reid Porter, a Vice President of IMC Phosphates MP Inc., which is the Managing General Partner of IMC Phosphates Company, and in that capacity also
the chief financial officer of IMC Phosphates Company, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 of IMC Phosphates Company as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMC Phosphates Company.



|                  
|------------------
|September 14, 2004
|                  
|/s/ J. Reid Porter
|J. Reid Porter
# C_2020167EN.01001101.xml

| 15.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9794 – Renault/Ferrovial/Car Sharing Mobility Services)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 167/03)

On 8 May 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9794. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9794. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 23.2





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We have issued our report, dated January 31, 2002, incorporated in the
consolidated financial statements of FNB Bancorp and Subsidiary and included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, which is
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file no.
333-91596 and file no. 333-98293). We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements of the aforementioned report.



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Francisco, California
March 28, 2003

                                       88
## Description of the 02 Pensac ola Bay System Shellfish Harvesting Area Shellfish Area 2-Digit # & Name: 02 Pensacola Bay System Map Number(s): 02 County(s): Escambia , Santa Rosa Brief description of extents: All waters south of the Escambia and Blackwater Rivers , west of the East Bay River in East Bay , west of Sharp Point in Santa Rosa Sound, and east of Magazine Point. Types of shellfish present: Oyster Current classification effective: August 17, 2004 Description of Management for Closures and Acres: 0212 Pensacola Bay conditionally approved Escambia Bay shellfish aquaculture lease areas managed during the Summer months of Jul - Sep: Closed in accordance with the criteria for 0222 Pensacola Bay conditionally approved Escambia Bay . 16 acres. 0222 Pensacola Bay conditionally approved Escambia Bay : Close when Escambia River discharge measured at Century, Florida exceeds 9,613 cubic feet per second or when cumulative five-day rainfa ll measured at Molino Forestry Tower exceeds 2. 06 inches or when environmental data is not available. 20,173 acres. 0232 Pensacola Bay conditionally approved East Bay : Close when Escambia River discharge measured at Century, Florida exceeds 9,634 cubic feet per second or cumulative five-day rainfall measured at Philpot Forestry Tower exceeds 3.15 inches. 27,581 acres. 

### Pa g e 1 of 2 Aquaculture Shellfish Harvestin g Pro g ram - Pensacola Bay SHA, Division of AQUACU ...

6/20/2011 http ://www.floridaa quaculture.com/SEAS

_ sums/02 _p ens.htm0216 Pensacola Bay conditionally restricted Escambia Bay : Close when Escambia River disch arge measured at Centur y, Florida exceeds 17,590 cubic feet per second or cumulative five-day rainfall measured at Molino Forestry Tower exceeds 9. 16 inches. 3,153 acres. 0226 Pensacola Bay conditionally restricted East Bay : Close when Escambia River discharge measured at Century, Fl orida exceeds 82,440 cubic feet per second or cumulative five-day rainfall measured at Philpot Forestry Tower exceeds 6.61 inches. 294 acres. Pensacola Bay prohibited Escambia Bay : 30,911 acres. Pensacola Bay prohibited East Bay : 7,482 acres. 

### Pa g e 2 of 2 Aquaculture Shellfish Harvestin g Pro g ram - Pensacola Bay SHA, Division of AQUACU ...

6/20/2011 http ://www.floridaa quaculture.com/SEAS

_ sums/02 _p ens.htm
# C_2020347EN.01000201.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9350 — Santander Group/Mapfre Group/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 347/02)

On 12 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9350. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9350. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---