alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 12, 2020        Climate Adaptation to Support Amphibian Conservation in U.S. Caribbean
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - (-)news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        September 2, 2015        What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard 

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Steven R. McNinch, Chief Executive Officer and I, Richard Sterrett, PrincipalFinancial Officer of Western Plains Energy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-Kof Western Plains Energy, L.L.C.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; and

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presentedin this annual report.

 
| Date:  December 28, 2007 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
|                          |
| /s/  Steven R. McNinch        |   |
|                          |   |
| Steven  R. McNinch            |
| Chief  Executive Officer      |
|                          |
|                          |
| /s/  Richard Sterrett         |   |
|                          |   |
| Richard  Sterrett             |
| Principal  Financial Officer  |
|                               |  |  |  |  |

 

----
Cristi LECKLITER and John Leckliter, Appellants, v. J. Isabel SOLANO, Isabel Solano, Serenity Marie Solano, deceased, and Erik Uziel Solano Dominguez, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mihir K. Taneja,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GeoPharma, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mihir K. Taneja    
|                       |  |     |  | Mihir K. Taneja        
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



22
Charles A. JERRY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Neil L. WHITESELL; NLW Holdings, LLC ; Whitesell Corporation; and Whitesell Precision Components, Inc. Appellants, v. BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; Whitesell Formed Components, Inc. ; and Whitesell Canada Corporation, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-3471

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5505 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require annual 

studies on ending the conservatorship of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2016 

Mr. HILL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to require annual studies on ending the conservatorship 

of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GSE Review and Re5 form Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5505 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL STUDIES ON ENDING THE CONSERVATOR2 SHIP OF FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC, AND 

3 REFORMING THE HOUSING FINANCE SYSTEM. 

4 Section 1074 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

5 Act of 2010 is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting after 

8 ‘‘Secretary of the Treasury shall’’ the following: 

9 ‘‘, on an annual basis,’’; and 

10 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘The 

11 study’’ and inserting ‘‘Each study’’; 

12 (2) by amending subsection (b) to read as fol13 lows: 

14 ‘‘(b) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—The Sec15 retary of the Treasury shall submit a report on each study 

16 required under subsection (a), along with recommenda17 tions developed in such study, to the President, the Com18 mittee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the 

19 Senate, and the Committee on Financial Services of the 

20 House of Representatives.’’; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(c) APPEARANCES BEFORE CONGRESS.—The Sec23 retary of the Treasury shall appear before the Committee 

24 on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate 

25 and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5505 IH

1 Representatives at annual hearings regarding each report 

2 required under subsection (b).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 10, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
13-1551

Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Trustmark Insurance Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED

ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE

PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A

DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN

ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST

SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals

2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United

3 States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York,

on the 25th 4 day of March, two thousand fourteen.

5

6 PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,

7 ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

8 Circuit Judges,

9 CHRISTINA REISS,

District Judge.* 10

11

12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

13 ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, as

14 successor in trust to FIRE AND

15 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF

16 CONNECTICUT, 

17

18 Petitioner-Appellant,

19

20 -v.- No. 13-1551

21

22 TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, 

23

24 Respondent-Appellee.

25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

* Chief Judge Christina Reiss, of the United States

District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by

designation. 

1
1 FOR APPELLANT: ROBERT LEWIN, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan

2 LLP, New York, NY.

3

4 FOR APPELLEE: EVERETT J. CYGAL (David S. Spector,

5 Catherine M. Masters, on the brief),

6 Schiff Hardin LLP, Chicago, IL.

7

8 Appeal from an order of the United States District

9 Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.).

10

11 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,

12 AND DECREED that the order of the district court be

13 AFFIRMED. 

14

15 Arrowood Indemnity Co., as successor to Fire and

16 Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut, appeals an order

17 denying its motion for judgment and contempt against

18 Trustmark Insurance Co. We assume the parties’ familiarity

19 with the underlying facts, the procedural history (as

20 implausible as that history may be), and the issues on

21 appeal. 

22

23 We review the district court’s legal conclusions de

24 novo and its findings of fact for clear error. See, e.g.,

25 Zeiler v. Deitsch, 500 F.3d 157, 164 (2d Cir. 2007); Huber

26 v. Marine Midland Bank, 51 F.3d 5, 10 (2d Cir. 1995). Upon

27 such review, we conclude that Arrowood’s motion was

28 appropriately denied, substantially for the reasons set

29 forth in the district court’s well-reasoned March 29, 2013

30 Memorandum of Decision. See Arrowood Indem. Co. v.

31 Trustmark Ins. Co., 938 F. Supp. 2d 267 (D. Conn. 2013).

32

33 We have considered all of Arrowood’s remaining

34 arguments and conclude that they are without merit. The

35 order of the district court is hereby affirmed.

36

37 FOR THE COURT:

38 CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE, CLERK

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - montana(1)
              - utah(1)
              - (-)virginia(3)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2009        Microbial abundance in the deep subsurface of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater: Relationship to lithology and impact processes

publication        October 28, 2015        The Chesapeake Bay impact structure

publication        January 1, 2001        High-resolution seismic reflection/refraction images near the outer margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater, York-James Peninsula, southeastern Virginia
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(300)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(299)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(33)
              - multimedia_image-141771(33)
              - multimedia_video(34)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(28)
              - connect_social_media(1)

## By Location

              - washington(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(31)

Featured Films and Shorts        December 16, 2013        Hazards: Geomagnetic Storms

Photography  Wind Turbines

Photography  Hoary Bat Victim

Photography  Wind Turbines

Photography  Wind Turbine

Photography  Wind Turbine Blade

Photography  Bison in Winter

Photography  Bison at Yellowstone National Park

Photography  Bison Cow and Calf

Photography        May 7, 2007        Public Wells

Photography        November 13, 2002        Public Wells

Photography  Pliocene Lignite Coal from BEN Village

Photography  Exposing Pliocene Lignite Bed Near a BEN Village

Photography  Bat with Radio Transmitter

Photography  Bats and Wind Energy

Photography  Bats and Wind Energy

Photography  Wind Energy Facility

Photography  BEN Patient

Photography  BEN Sampling in Serbia

Photography  Pliocene Lignite Bed

Photography  BEN Sampling in Serbia

Photography  Sampling a Sprint in BEN Village

Photography  Kidney Size Comparison of BEN Victims

Photography  Wind Turbine

Photography  Dave Mech with Brutus

Photography  Dave Mech Following Wolves

Photography  Brutus the North Pole Wolf

Photography  Brutus the North Pole Wolf

Photography  Brutus the North Pole Wolf

Photography  Brutus Dominance Behavior After Capture

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 549 

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to require the EEOC 

to approve commencing or intervening in certain litigation, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself, Mr. ROKITA, and Mr. HUDSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to 

require the EEOC to approve commencing or intervening 

in certain litigation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Litigation Oversight 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 549 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPROVAL OF EEOC LITIGATION COMMENCEMENT 

2 OR INTERVENTION. 

3 Section 705 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 

4 U.S.C. 2000e–4) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(l)(1) The Commission shall approve or disapprove 

7 by majority vote whether the Commission shall commence 

8 or intervene in litigation involving multiple plaintiffs, or 

9 an allegation of systemic discrimination or a pattern or 

10 practice of discrimination. 

11 ‘‘(2) A member of the Commission shall have the 

12 power to require the Commission to approve or disapprove 

13 by majority vote whether the Commission shall commence 

14 or intervene in any litigation. 

15 ‘‘(3) Neither the Commission nor a member of the 

16 Commission may delegate the authority provided under 

17 paragraph (1) or (2) to any other person. 

18 ‘‘(4) Not later than 30 days after the Commission 

19 commences or intervenes in litigation pursuant to approval 

20 under this subsection, the Commission shall post and 

21 maintain the following information on its public website 

22 with respect to the litigation: 

23 ‘‘(A) The court in which the case was brought. 

24 ‘‘(B) The name and case number of the case. 

25 ‘‘(C) The nature of the allegation. 

26 ‘‘(D) The causes of action brought. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 549 IH

1 ‘‘(E) Each Commissioner’s vote on commencing 

2 or intervening in the litigation. 

3 ‘‘(5) The Commission shall issue, in a manner con4 sistent with section 713, procedural regulations to carry 

5 out this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cascading Hazards

Filters

              - (-)science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(11)
              - science_science(46)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(127)
              - multimedia_image-141771(119)
              - multimedia_image-141773(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(6)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(112)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(29)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(31)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(32)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

Education        August 5, 2019        Teaching About Cascades Volcanoes - Education
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00493

- CR

Brence J. Walker

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1335687D )

February 11, 2016

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SE COND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
Brian HERNANDEZ-VARGAS, DOC #Y63493, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4373

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - (-)multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)

## By Year

Photography        September 19, 2019        Astronauts descending into Meteor Crater in Winslow Arizona.

Historical        December 31, 1980        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

map        January 20, 2014        Geologic map of the eastern quarter of the Flagstaff 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, Coconino County, northern Arizona

Illustrations        December 31, 2019        Arizona Landsat State Mosaic

Satellite imagery        August 31, 2009        Impact