Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules 64767 

(i) Corrective Action for Failed Postmodification Operational Test 

After accomplishment of the modification 

specified in paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD, 

each time a GFI fails an operational test, 

before further flight, replace the GFI or 

deactivate the associated fuel pump, in 

accordance with a method approved by the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA. 

Note 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD: 

Guidance on the operational test specified in 

paragraph (i) of this AD can be found in Task 

28.18.00/01, Operational Check of Centre 

Tank Fuel Pump GFI, of the Airbus A318/ 

A319/A320/A321 Maintenance Review Board 

Report or Task 281800–710–801, Operational 

Check of Centre Tank Fuel Pump GFI, of the 

Airbus A318/A319/A320 Aircraft 

Maintenance Manual. 

Note 2 to paragraph (i) of this AD: 

Guidance on the fuel pump deactivation 

specified in paragraph (h) of this AD can be 

found in Item 28–21–02, Center Tank 

Systems, of the FAA Master Minimum 

Equipment List for Airbus A318/A319/A320/ 

A321. 

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356; phone: 425–227–1405; fax: 425– 

227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9– 

ANM–116–AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2012–0198, dated September 26, 

2012; and Airbus Service Bulletin A320–28– 

1188, dated March 23, 2012; for related 

information. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness 

Office—EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 

31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 

5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email 

account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet 

http://www.airbus.com. You may review 

copies of the referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

15, 2012. 

John P. Piccola, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–26078 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–0495; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–236–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream 

Aerospace LP (Type Certificate 

Previously Held by Israel Aircraft 

Industries, Ltd.) Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: The FAA withdraws a notice 

of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that 

proposed a new airworthiness directive 

(AD) for certain Gulfstream Aerospace 

LP (Type Certificate previously held by 

Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model 

Galaxy and Gulfstream 200 airplanes. 

The proposed AD would have required 

determining the lengths of the wear 

indicating pins of all brake assemblies, 

shortening the pin if the wear indicating 

pin is too long, inspecting for normal 

brake wear, and replacing brakes with 

new brakes if necessary. Since the 

issuance of the NPRM, the FAA has 

received new data that indicates the 

actions addressing this unsafe condition 

have been accomplished on the 

worldwide fleet. Accordingly, the 

proposed AD is withdrawn. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) 

is the Document Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Groves, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1503; 

fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We proposed to amend part 39 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

part 39) with a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) for a new AD for 

certain Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type 

Certificate previously held by Israel 

Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model Galaxy 

and Gulfstream 200 airplanes. That 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on May 31, 2012 (77 FR 32069). 

The NPRM would have required 

determining the lengths of the wear 

indicating pins of all brake assemblies, 

shortening the pin if the wear indicating 

pin is too long, inspecting for normal 

brake wear, and replacing brakes with 

new brakes if necessary. The NPRM 

resulted from reports of degraded brake 

performance during landing due to 

improperly-sized wear indicating pins. 

The proposed actions were intended to 

detect and correct improperly-sized 

wear indicating pins, which, if not 

corrected, could result in worn-out 

brake pads and subsequent loss of 

braking power, which could result in 

runway overruns. 

Actions Since NPRM (77 FR 32069, 

May 31, 2012) Was Issued 

Since we issued the NPRM (77 FR 

32069, May 31, 2012), FAA has received 

new data that indicates the unsafe 

condition no longer exists. Review of 

the Gulfstream Aerospace LP Model 

Galaxy and Gulfstream 200 airplane 

service history shows that the 

worldwide fleet is in compliance with 

the actions specified in Gulfstream 

Service Bulletin 200–32–389, Revision 

1, dated October 27, 2011. Therefore, 

the unsafe condition no longer exists. 

FAA’s Conclusions 

Upon further consideration, we have 

determined that the actions specified in 

Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200–32– 

389, Revision 1, dated October 27, 2011, 

and the Gulfstream Aerospace LP Model 

Galaxy and Gulfstream 200 airplane 

service history adequately addressed the 

identified unsafe condition. Therefore, 

it is not necessary to issue a final rule. 

Accordingly, the NPRM (77 FR 32069, 

May 31, 2012) is withdrawn. 

Withdrawal of the NPRM (77 FR 

32069, May 31, 2012) does not preclude 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

64768 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 23, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

the FAA from issuing another related 

action or commit the FAA to any course 

of action in the future. 

Regulatory Impact 

Since this action only withdraws an 

NPRM (77 FR 32069, May 31, 2012), it 

is neither a proposed nor a final rule 

and therefore is not covered under 

Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, or DOT Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, 

February 26, 1979). 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Withdrawal 

Accordingly, we withdraw the NPRM, 

Docket No. FAA–2012–0495, Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–236–AD, which 

was published in the Federal Register 

on May 31, 2012 (77 FR 32069). 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

14, 2012. 

John P. Piccola, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–26080 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

[REG–140668–07] 

RIN 1545–BH16 

Regulations Regarding the Application 

of Section 172(h) Including 

Consolidated Groups; Correction 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed 

rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (REG–140668–07) that was 

published in the Federal Register on 

Monday, September 17, 2012 (77 FR 

57452). The proposed regulation 

provides guidance regarding the 

treatment of corporate equity reduction 

transactions (CERTs), including the 

treatment of multiple step plans for the 

acquisition of stock and CERTs 

involving members of a consolidated 

group. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amie Colwell Breslow or Marie C. 

Milnes-Vasquez at (202) 622–7530 (not 

a toll free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice of proposed rulemaking 

(REG–140668–07) that is the subject of 

these corrections are under sections 172 

and 1502 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

Need for Correction 

As published, the notice of proposed 

rulemaking (REG–140668–07) contains 

errors that may prove to be misleading 

and are in need of clarification. 

Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the notice of proposed 

rulemaking (REG–140668–07), that was 

the subject of FR Doc. 2012–22838, is 

corrected as follows: 

1. On page 57452, in the preamble, 

column 1, under the caption ADDRESSES, 

line 10, the language ‘‘Service, 1111 

Constitution Avenue NW.,’’ is corrected 

to read ‘‘Service, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue NW.,’’. 

2. On page 57453, in the preamble, 

column 2, under the caption 

‘‘Background’’, line 16 from the bottom 

of the page, the language ‘‘return group; 

(4) application of these’’ is corrected to 

read ‘‘group; (4) application of these’’. 

3. On page 57456, in the preamble, 

column 3, under the paragraph heading 

C. Loss Limitation Years, line 6 from the 

bottom of the first paragraph, the 

language ‘‘section 172 and 381 are 

applied as if the’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘sections 172 and 381 are applied as if 

the’’. 

§ 1.172(h)–2 [Corrected] 

4. On Page 57462, column 1, under 

the paragraph heading § 1.172(h)–2

Computation of a CERIL., fourth 

paragraph of the column, line 6, the 

language ‘‘addition, under the 

principles of section’’ is corrected to 

read ‘‘addition, under the principles of’’. 

§ 1.172(h)–4 [Corrected] 

5. On Page 57465, column 1, under 

the paragraph heading § 1.172(h)–4

Special rules for predecessors and 

successors., second full paragraph of the 

column, line 13, the language 

‘‘occurred. See §§ 1.172(h)–5(a) 

(defining’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘occurred. See § 1.172(h)–5(a) 

(defining’’. 

6. On Page 57465, column 3, under 

the same paragraph heading, line 21 

from the top of the column, the language 

‘‘interest paid or accrued during the 3 

year’’ is corrected to read ‘‘interest paid 

or accrued during the three-year’’. 

§ 1.1502–72 [Corrected] 

7. On page 57471, column 2, under 

the paragraph heading § 1.1502–72 

Corporate equity reduction 

transactions., lines 10 and 11 from the 

top of the column, the language 

‘‘[$10,000,000 + $100,000 + 250,000 + 

175,000]. See § 1.172(h)–2(b)(3) for 

rules’’ is corrected to read ‘‘[$10,000,000 

+ $100,000 + $250,000 + $175,000]. See 

§ 1.172(h)–2(b)(3) for rules’’. 

8. On page 57473, column 1, under 

the same paragraph heading, line 22 of 

the second paragraph, the language 

‘‘([$1,400 + $1,000 + 1,200]/3). Because 

T is’’ is corrected to read ‘‘([$1,400 + 

$1,000 + $1,200]/3). Because T is’’. 

9. On page 57473, column 1, under 

the same paragraph heading, line 2 from 

the bottom of the second paragraph, the 

language ‘‘([$1,400 + $1,000 + 1,200 + 

$600 + $200 +)’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘([$1,400 + $1,000 + $1,200 + $600 + 

$200 +)’’. 

10. On page 57475, column 3, under 

the same paragraph heading, line 11 of 

the second full paragraph of the column, 

the language ‘‘172(h)(3)(C) § 1.172(h)– 

1(c)(3) and (f), and’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘172(h)(3)(C), § 1.172(h)–1(c)(3) and (f), 

and’’. 

Guy Traynor, 

Federal Register Liaison, Publications and 

Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 

Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure 

and Administration). 

[FR Doc. 2012–26001 Filed 10–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

39 CFR Part 20 

International Mailing Services: 

Proposed Product and Price Changes 

AGENCY: Postal Service,TM

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In October 2012, the Postal 

Service filed a notice of mailing services 

price adjustments with the Postal 

Regulatory Commission (PRC), effective 

on January 27, 2013. The Postal Service 

proposes to revise various sections of 

Mailing Standards of the United States 

Postal Service, International Mail 

Manual (IMM®) to reflect new prices 

and classification changes. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before November 23, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver comments to 

the manager, Product Classification, 

U.S. Postal Service®, 475 L’Enfant Plaza 

SW., RM 4446, Washington, DC 20260– 

5015. You may inspect and photocopy 

all written comments at USPS®

Headquarters Library, 475 L’Enfant 

Plaza SW., 11th Floor N, Washington 

DC by appointment only between the 

hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS