alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Uranium deposits under conglomeratic sandstone of the Morrison Formation, Colorado and Utah      

      August 13, 1958    

In southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah, strata of conglomeratic sandstone are localized at the base of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation of Jurassic age. These discrete lithologic units contain sedimentary structures oriented in a prevailing easterly direction. They are believed to cover about one-third of the underlying Salt Wash Member in southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah, and they locally rest on ore-bearing sandstone in the Salt Wash Member. Eastward-trending planar cross-stratification and trough cross-stratification and a general westward coarsening of sediments in the conglomeratic sandstone strata suggest that they are the products of stream aggradation from westerly source areas. Uranium-vanadium deposits in the uppermost, almost continuous, layer of sandstone of the Salt Wash Member are classified according to their association with the conglomerate strata. Of the 363 deposits studied in the uppermost sandstone layer of the Salt Wash Member, 101 are known to be directly beneath conglomeratic sandstone strata, 211 are below the projected extension of conglomeratic sandstone strata, 33 are beyond the safe limits of such projection, and 18 are lateral to the margins of conglomeratic sandstone strata. At places, near clusters of deposits in the uppermost sandstone of the underlying Salt Wash Member, conglomeratic sandstone strata of the Brushy Basin Member are also mineralized. It is postulated that ground-water movement during deposition of the Morrison Formation in Late Jurassic time localized the uranium and vanadium. The direction of this ground-water movement is believed to have been related to streams that deposited the conglomeratic strata, so that in the ore-bearing sandstone metal ions contained in the ground water were localized in places of high transmissibility and in the vicinity of decaying organic debris. According to the age of the ores, precipitation of the metals was much later than their localization, probably during Late Cretaceous or early Tertiary time.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Morrison Formation
                  - Colorado
                  -  Utah

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - (-)north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 6, 2011        Groundwater Awareness Week is March 6-12

Podcasts        September 5, 2011        Responding to Hurricanes, Floods and Droughts in North Carolina
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - montana(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 16, 2020        Comet NEOWISE and the Roosevelt Arch at Yellowstone National Park

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Douglas A. Chesson, President and Chief Executive Officer and Elizabeth T. Beale, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, do each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|This 25thday of March, 2004.              
|                                          
|/s/ Douglas A. Chesson                    
|                                          
|Douglas A. Chesson Chief Executive Officer
|                                          
|/s/ Elizabeth T. Beale                    
|                                          
|Elizabeth T. Beale Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Communications
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|November 11, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Rocco B. Commisso  
|                  |  |     |  |                        
|                  |  |     |  | Rocco B. Commisso      
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |     |  |                        
|                  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark E. Stephan    
|                  |  |     |  |                        
|                  |  |     |  | Mark E. Stephan        
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
J.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-399

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 15, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Thomas C. FILIPPONE, Appellant, v. G. Michael BACCICH, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 34.3



|     |  |                                                        
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |                                                        
|     |  | KPMG LLP 1601 Market
Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

TransCentra, Inc.:

We have examined managements assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance,
included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that TransCentra, Inc., formerly Regulus Group LLC, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1 122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv)
of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities
transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. TransCentra, Inc. has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2011. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our
examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for
the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2011 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 15, 2012

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.

member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014

US Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. is requesting an extension to the exemption from Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations part 137.53(c)(2). This exemption is based on being in the public’s best interest to not 

jettison spray loads over congested areas and the ability to show an equivalent level of safety with not 

installing a jettison system. 

Thank you very much for your attention to this. If you need any additional information, or have any 

questions, please feel free to contact me. 

Sincerely,

Michael O. Rosolina

Flight Operations Manager – Aerial Application

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. 

P.O. Box 7

Bridgewater, VA 22812

Phone: (540) 828-6070

Fax: (540) 828-4031

mrosolina@dynamicaviation.com
p. 1 of 2

From: Palazzolo, Michael A. [ mailto:Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com ] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 11:04 AM To: Putney, David Subject: RE: RE: FW: massena east potlines



### David,

Alcoa has announced the permanent shut down of Potline 1, formally notified NY DEC and NY DEC is revising our Title V now to reflect the shut down. So, there is really no question regarding whether Potline 1 should be removed from the analysis. The allowable emissions (primary control and secondary emission) should be reduced by 1/3 to reflect the change.

Thank you,

Mike

Michael Palazzolo Alcoa Inc. 201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858 Ph: 412-553-4832

From: Putney, David [ mailto:putney.david@epa.gov ] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:48 AM To: Palazzolo, Michael A. Subject: EXT: RE: FW: massena east potlines

Mike,

Thanks so much – I really appreciate this informati on.

Also, I spoke with Chuck about reducing the product ion capacity at this facility for purposes of estimating the emissions used in the upcoming model ing. He indicated a willingness to reduce actual emissions estimates by 1/3 to reflect actual condit ions (i.e., the pending shutdown of potline 1). However, in order to be consistent with what we hav e done with other industry sectors, he indicated that maybe we should estimate allowable emissions b ased on operation of all three potlines - if it is the case that potline 1 can still be legally operat ed. Is potline 1 still on your Title V permit? If s o, do you intend to have it removed from the permit at the ne xt renewal?

Thanks again,

David Putney, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Divisionp. 2 of 2

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243-02 Ph: (919) 541-2016 Fax: (919) 541-3207 Email: putney.david@epa.gov

From: Palazzolo, Michael A. [ mailto:Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com ] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:56 AM To: Putney, David Subject: FW: FW: massena east potlines



### David,

The rooms to the far right are Line 1. See red line s marked on attached version of photo.

Thanks,

Mike

Michael Palazzolo Alcoa Inc. 201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858 Ph: 412-553-4832

From: Rufa, Nathan P. Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:53 AM To: Palazzolo, Michael A.; Parent, Jordan J. Subject: RE: FW: massena east potlines

The two rooms on the far right (see pic). Farthest right room is Room 1 and the room to the left of that is Room 2.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

Clean Fu~et Pr0/ /"1 _ ~ 

Leila H. S?o't6r~~ Transportation & Regional Programs Division 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

EPA's Clean Fuel Fleet Program (CFFP) was established by the 1990 Clean Air 

Act Amendments to reduce emissions in metropolitan areas not meeting Federal air 

quality standards, promote vehicle emission control technologies, encourage the 

alternative fuel vehicle market, and provide states with an incentive to promote the use of 

Clean Fuel Vehicles. 

EPA has since published new emission standards that are more stringent than the 

CFFP standards for heavy-duty diesel and heavy-duty gasoline engines, as well as lightduty vehicles. Therefore, vehicles certified to these new standards are considered 

acceptable for meeting the requirements contained in Part 88 for the Clean Fuel Fleets 

Program. 

Fleet managers seeking to meet the requirements of the CFFP should be assured 

that all vehicles manufactured to meet the Tier 2 emission standards are equivalent to or 

cleaner than earlier emission levels mandated by the CFFP. Therefore, these new Tier 2 

vehicles are acceptable for use in meeting the CFFP requirements. 

@ Printed on Recycled Paper
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc Filed 02/03/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc Filed 02/03/22 Page 2 of 3
February 3, 2022

Lorena Delgado

Lorena Delgado

ldelgado@raslg.com

Case 21-20622-PDR Doc Filed 02/03/22 Page 3 of 3
Brandon FORVENDEL v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

NO. 2017-02032

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5553 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require fines collected 

for violations of the rules of the Municipal Rulemaking Board to be 

deposited into the Treasury and to amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002 to remove a requirement on the use of certain funds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2016 

Mrs. WAGNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

fines collected for violations of the rules of the Municipal 

Rulemaking Board to be deposited into the Treasury 

and to amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to remove 

a requirement on the use of certain funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5553 IH

1 SECTION 1. REALLOCATION OF FINES FOR VIOLATIONS OF 

2 RULES OF MUNICIPAL RULEMAKING BOARD 

3 INTO GENERAL FUND OF TREASURY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 15B(c)(9) of the Securi5 ties Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–4(c)(9)) is 

6 amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(9) Fines collected for violations of the rules of the 

8 Board shall be deposited and credited as general revenue 

9 of the Treasury.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to fines collected after the date 

12 of enactment of this Act. 

13 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC COMPANY 

14 ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD TO USE 

15 CERTAIN FUNDS FOR MERIT SCHOLARSHIP 

16 PROGRAM. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 109(c) of the Sarbanes18 Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7219(c)) is amended by 

19 striking paragraph (2). 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 109 of the 

21 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7219) is amend22 ed— 

23 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘USES OF

24 FUNDS’’ and all that follows through ‘‘The budget’’ 

25 and inserting ‘‘USES OF FUNDS.—The budget’’; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5553 IH

1 (2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘subsection 

2 (c)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (c)’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Joshua DAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

70374 

Vol. 72, No. 237 

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–56809; File No. SR–Amex– 

2007–116] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice 

of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as 

Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 

Thereto, To Harmonize the Annual 

Listing Fees for All Exchange Traded 

Funds 

Correction 

In notice document E7–22974 

beginning on page 66203 in the issue of 

Tuesday, November 27, 2007, make the 

following correction: 

On page 66205, in the second column, 

in the third paragraph, in the last line, 

‘‘December 17, 2007’’ should read 

‘‘December 18, 2007’’. 

[FR Doc. Z7–22974 Filed 12–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES5
Deon DANNA v. The RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL CO., LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0911

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

 

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Denis McGlynn, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companyfor the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form 10-K”), fully complies withrequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: March13, 2003

 

 
| /s/                           | Denis McGlynn |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------|--------|
| Denis McGlynn                 |
| President and Chief Executive |
| Officer and Director          |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Coordination of Media Interviews

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(11)
              - multimedia_video-149194(10)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Podcasts        February 5, 2009        Hazard Roundup--Dec 2009 - Jan 2009
Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.