alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Colorado

Filters

              - products_publications(4)

## By Location

              - alabama(14)
              - alaska(37)
              - arizona(945)
              - arkansas(27)
              - california(436)
              - colorado(3787)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(12)
              - georgia(24)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(217)
              - illinois(18)
              - indiana(10)
              - iowa(38)
              - kansas(190)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(18)
              - maine(10)
              - maryland(10)
              - massachusetts(16)
              - michigan(8)
              - minnesota(33)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(47)
              - montana(240)
              - nebraska(186)
              - nevada(333)
              - (-)new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(9)
              - new mexico(667)
              - new york(21)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(97)
              - ohio(15)
              - oklahoma(119)
              - oregon(154)
              - pennsylvania(18)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(4)
              - south carolina(7)
              - south dakota(156)
              - tennessee(13)
              - texas(249)
              - utah(851)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(24)
              - washington(135)
              - west virginia(8)
              - wisconsin(25)
              - wyoming(549)

## By Year

publication        December 5, 2014        Surveillance and monitoring of white-tailed deer for chronic wasting disease in the northeastern United States

publication        January 1, 2004        Collection, analysis, and age-dating of sediment cores from 56 U.S. lakes and reservoirs sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992-2001

publication        May 8, 2020        A review of pathogens, diseases, and contaminants of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in North America

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
# C_2020083EN.01000301.xml

| 13.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9740 — ISQ/Rubis/Rubis Terminal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 83/03)

On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9740. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9740. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carol Dore-Falcone                           
|Carol Dore-Falcone                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 24, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8560

THOMAS EUGENE LANGSTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Mecklenberg Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-95-454-AM)

Submitted: March 29, 1996 Decided: April 19, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Eugene Langston, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Langston v. Warden, No. CA-95-454-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Joseph JOHNSTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D17-3248 5D17-3249

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5530 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to modify 

certain provisions relating to the capital financing of 

historically Black colleges and universities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5530 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HBCU Capital Financ3 ing Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BOND INSURANCE. 

5 Section 343 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

6 U.S.C. 1066b) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘escrow account’’ each place it 

8 appears and inserting ‘‘bond insurance fund’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘an’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘a’’; and 

12 (B) in paragraph (8), in the matter pre13 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘an’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘a’’. 

15 SEC. 3. STRENGTHENING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. 

16 Paragraph (9) of section 345 of the Higher Edu17 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1066d) is amended to read 

18 as follows: 

19 ‘‘(9) may, directly or by grant or contract, pro20 vide financial counseling and technical assistance to 

21 eligible institutions to prepare the institutions to 

22 qualify, apply for, and maintain a capital improve23 ment loan, including a loan under this part; and’’. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5530 RFS 

1 SEC. 4. HBCU CAPITAL FINANCING ADVISORY BOARD. 

2 Paragraph (2) of section 347(c) of the Higher Edu3 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1066f(c)) is amended to 

4 read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(2) REPORT.—On an annual basis, the Advi6 sory Board shall prepare and submit to the author7 izing committees a report on the status of the his8 torically Black colleges and universities described in 

9 paragraph (1)(A). That report shall also include— 

10 ‘‘(A) an overview of all loans in the capital 

11 financing program, including the most recent 

12 loans awarded in the fiscal year in which the re13 port is submitted; and 

14 ‘‘(B) administrative and legislative rec15 ommendations, as needed, for addressing the 

16 issues related to construction financing facing 

17 historically Black colleges and universities.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Nadira PERSAUD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The CAMILLE MARIE GRAEPEL TRUST, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of
WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-AR4;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as
servicers and sub-servicers:

Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
David Orlando RAMOS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0920

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 13396 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:14

- cr - 00228

- BJD

- JRK

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CHRISTOPHER SHAWN WARNOC K, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( June 29, 2021 ) Before MART IN , ROSENBAUM, and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-13396 Date Filed: 06/29/2021 Page: 1 of 32 Christopher Warnock , proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by § 603(b) of the First S tep Act of 2018. 1 He argues that the district court abused its discretion in not appointing him counsel because, without counsel, he was unable to obtain his medical records and show extraordinary and compelling circumstances warranting release. We review de novo jurisdictional issues, which we must raise sua sponte. United States v. Lopez , 562 F.3d 1309, 1311 (11th Cir. 2009). We retain jurisdiction to hear only live cases and controversies under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. United State s v. Al

- Arian , 514 F.3d 1184, 1189 (11th Cir. 2008). A dispute is moot, and ceases to be a case or controversy, when we can no longer provide meaningful relief to the claimant. Id. Completion of a prison term moots a challenge to the term of confinement. United States v. Farmer , 923 F.2d 1557, 1568 (11th Cir. 1991). In this appeal, we are compelled to dismiss Warnock’ s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Warnock has been released from the term of imprisonment from which he sought compassionate release, 2 a f act that has now been confirmed by the

1 Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5239 (Dec. 21, 2018) (“First Step Act”).

2 According to the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator page, Warnock was released on May 7, 2021. https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/

USCA11 Case: 20-13396 Date Filed: 06/29/2021 Page: 2 of 33 United States. This means that the instant appeal no longer presents a live case and controversy over which we retain jurisdiction, and is, therefore, moot. See Al

Arian , 514 F.3d at 1189; Farmer , 923 F.2d at 1568. A ccordingly, we DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

USCA11 Case: 20-13396 Date Filed: 06/29/2021 Page: 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(9)
              - arizona(5)
              - (-)arkansas(1)
              - california(30)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(5)
              - hawaii(18)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(14)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
Birmingham Branch 

110 Vulcan Road 

Birmingham, AL 35209-4702 

(205) 942-{)168 

(205) 941-1603 (FAX) 

Ms. Heather McTeer Toney 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, S. W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

RE: Withdrawal ofthe PM2.5 SILs and Interpollutant Offset Ratios from the State of 

Alabama's State Implementation Plan Revision request dated May 2, 2011 

Ms. Toney: 

On May 2, 201I, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 

submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to EPA Region 4 to incorporate 

federal requirements for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5). Revisions were made to the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and New Source Review (NSR) 

regulations in Chapter 335-3-I4 to align ADEM's regulations with EPA's regulations 

and requirements as published on December 31, 2002, November 29, 2005, May I6, 2008, 

and October 20, 20IO. 

In the preamble to the May I6, 2008, final rule, EPA included preferred or presumptive 

offset ratios for specific PM2.5 precursors that states could adopt in conjunction with the 

new interpollutant offset provisions for PM2.5. These ratios were subsequently the subject 

of a petition for reconsideration, which the EPA Administrator granted. Therefore, EPA no 

longer supports the ratios as presumptively approvable for adoption in SIPs containing 

nonattainment NSR programs for PM2.5. 

On January 22, 20 I3, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit (Court) granted a request from EPA to vacate and remand to the EPA the portions 

of the PSD PM2.5 rules addressing the Significant Impact Levels (SILs) for PM2.5 (found 

in paragraph (k)(2) in 40 CFR 51.166 and 52.2I ), as well as other portions, so that EPA 

could voluntarily correct an error in the provisions. On December 9, 20I3, EPA issued a 

final rulemaking to remove the vacated/remanded SILs and other provisions from the 

federal PSD regulations (78 FR 73698). 

Due to the Court's decision to grant EPA's request to vacate and remand the portions of 

the PM2.5 rules addressing the SILs for PM2.5, the intended purpose of ADEM's May 2, 

20 II, SIP revision to be consistent with federal regulations regarding these provisions, is 

no longer valid. Therefore, ADEM requests that this letter serve as its request to withdraw 

Decatur Branch 

2715 Sandlin Road, S.W. 

Decatur, AL 35603-1333 

(256) 353·1713 

(256) 340-9359 (FAX) 

* * 

Mobile Branch 

2204 Perimeter Road 

Mobile, AL 36615-1131 

(251) 450-3400 

(251) 479 2593 (FAX) 

Mobile-Coastal 

3664 Dauphin Street, Suite B 

Mobile, AL 36608 

(251) 304·1176 

(251) 304-1189 (FAX) 
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Chris Howard of my staff at (334) 

271-7878. 

Si~£a/~ 

Ronald W. Gore, Chief 

Air Division 

RWG/ADH/bdc
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Douglas Schaedler, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of UTEK Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors: 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

Dated this 8th day of May, 2009.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-17716]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment 
Request

Correction

    In notice document E8-17716 beginning on page 45222 in the issue of 
Monday, August 4, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 45223, in the first column, under DATES:, in the second 
line, ``September 30, 2008'' should read ``October 3, 2008''.

[FR Doc. Z8-17716 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Roger CARTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1388

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Rooks v. State*, 224 So.3d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).