alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132984 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132984 COA: 270489 Muskegon CC: 00-045234-FH GEORGE JOHN BOLENBAUGH, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 28, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adam Wasserman, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Adam Wasserman
------------------
Adam Wasserman
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
August 14, 2006
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Genius
Products, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Edward
J. Byrnes, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant at the dates
and for the  periods indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.







Dated:  March
      25, 2009
            By:
            /s/Edward J.
      ByrnesEdward
      J. Byrnes
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Minerals Management Service

          - [Docket No. MMS-2008-MRM-0029]

      ( print page 46367)    

### Correction

In notice document E8-17730 beginning on page 45055 in the issue of Friday, August 1, 2008, make the following correction:

                On page 45055, in the second column, under                 **DATES**                , in the second line, “September 2, 2008” should read “September 30, 2008”.            

[FR Doc. Z8-17730 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Blair Merriam, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial
Officer of Platina Energy Group, Inc., certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Platina
		Energy Group, Inc.;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
		untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
		necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
		under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
		the period covered by this quarterly report;

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
		information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
		material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
		cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
		this quarterly report;

	4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
		establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
		defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 4 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
		we have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
			material information relating to the registrant, including its
			consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
			entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
			is being prepared;

		b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
			procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
			quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

		c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
			of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
			Evaluation Date;

	5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
		our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
		committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
		equivalent function):

		a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
			controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
			record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
			for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
			controls; and

		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
			employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
			controls; and

	6.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
		quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
		controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
		controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
		corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
		weaknesses.

Date:  August 17, 2005				/s/ Blair Merriam
						    Blair Merriam
						Chief Executive Officer, President
						and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-14563]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 15, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 45866]]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available from: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Assistance, 
Washington, DC 20549-0213.
    Extension: Form N-8F, SEC File No. 270-136, OMB Control No. 3235-
0157.

Correction

    In notice document E7-14563 beginning on page 41531 in the issue of 
July 30, 2007, make the following correction:
    On page 41531, in the third column, the document heading and the 
next three lines are corrected to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. Z7-14563 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Marco Romulus SIMPLICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2030

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Curtis BROWN, Petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Big Data Analysis

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(14)
              - multimedia_audio(45)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(43)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_video(201)
              - multimedia_video-149194(140)
              - multimedia_video-149195(23)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(13)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        October 27, 2020        Dynamic Styling for NHD and WBD REST Web Services

How to's and trainings        September 19, 2018        A USGS guide for finding and interpreting high-water marks

How to's and trainings        May 31, 2017        LCMAP: Revolutionizing Remote Sensing

How to's and trainings        October 25, 2022        Using Google Earth Engine to Generate Monthly-to-Weekly Maps of Surface Water

How to's and trainings        July 8, 2015        PRMS Weasel Overview

How to's and trainings        July 9, 2015        PRMS Simulation of Depression Storage

How to's and trainings        November 30, 2023        PubTalk-11/2023: Six Eruptions at Two Volcanoes Over the Past Three Years

How to's and trainings        May 31, 2015        PRMS Overview

How to's and trainings        December 15, 2020        Value of Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, Projection Collection 1

How to's and trainings        June 21, 2016        Understanding Water Availability Across Landscapes in a Time of Increasing Drought

How to's and trainings        March 31, 2015        Basic Rating Development Using GRSAT

How to's and trainings        March 28, 2023        The Latest Updates to the HydroAdd Tool

How to's and trainings        March 31, 2015        Developing and Applying Shift Curves Using GRSAT
STATE EX REL. Clyde F. AKERS, IV v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1268

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's sentencing claims are not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Thomas* , 08-2912 (La. 10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La.

*462Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re: CASE NO.: 20-13709-BKC-RAM

Chapter 7

LAZARO PEREZ

SSN: XXX-XX-0288

MARIA L GUZMAN

SSN: XXX-XX-9384

 Debtors. /

ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE'S AGREED EX PARTE SECOND MOTION TO 

ENLARGE TIME TO FILE A COMPLAINT OBJECTING TO DEBTORS’ DISCHARGES

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon Joel L. Tabas, Trustee's Agreed Ex 

Parte Motion to Enlarge Time to File a Complaint Objecting to Debtors’ Discharges (the 

"Motion") [ECF 35], and the Court, having reviewed the Motion, having noted the agreement 

of the parties, and based on the record, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion is granted.

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 15, 2020.

Case 20-13709-RAM Doc 36 Filed 09/16/20 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.: 20-13709-BKC-RAM

Page 2 of 2

2. The Court finds that cause exists to enlarge the time for the Trustee to file a 

complaint objecting to the Debtors’ discharges.

3. The deadline for Joel L. Tabas, Trustee, to file a complaint objecting to the 

Debtors’ discharges shall be enlarged through, and including, November 16, 2020.

# # #

Submitted By:

Joshua D. Silver

Florida Bar No. 100022

Tabas & Soloff, P.A.

Attorneys for Trustee, Joel L. Tabas

25 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 248 

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 375-8171

Facsimile: (305) 381-7708

E mail: jsilver@tabassoloff.com 

Copy furnished to:

Joshua D. Silver

Attorney Silver is directed to serve copies of this Order on all interested parties and file a Certificate of Service.

Case 20-13709-RAM Doc 36 Filed 09/16/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2023(1)

Research        September 23, 2022        Caves

staff profileTimothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

staff profileKaj Williams, Ph.D.

publication        May 12, 2020        Effects of climate change on plague exposure pathways and resulting disease dynamics
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - iowa(1)

## By Year

Photography        June 1, 2022        Asteroid.png

Photography        March 25, 2022        Asteroid-Earth.jpg

Photography        June 1, 2022        Figure showing the potential dispersal of asteroid outfall from an impact in Colorado.

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, U, Face, PG county, MD

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, U, Side, PG county, MD

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, F, Face, MD, Charles Co

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, F, Side, MD, Charles Co

Photography        April 6, 2023        TitusAtTheUN-VIE.png

Photography        September 20, 2005        Decorah, Iowa

Photography        April 25, 2021        Landsat 8 Collection 2 image of the Richat Structure

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11162

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RANDY REED THROCKMORTON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-69-3

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Randy Reed Throckmorton appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction for mail fraud, aiding and abetting. Throckmorton argues

that his sentence is unreasonable as a matter of law because this court’s

application of a presumption of reasonableness to sentences imposed within a

properly calculated guidelines range is in violation of the principles announced

in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). He concedes that the argument

is foreclosed by circuit precedent but raises it to preserve it for further review.
No. 06-11162

2

Throckmorton’s argumentis foreclosed by Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct.

2456, 2462-66 (2007), wherein the Supreme Court affirmed the use of a

presumption of reasonableness to review sentences imposed within the

guidelines range. 

Throckmorton also argues that his sentence of 46 months of imprisonment,

which was within the applicable advisory sentencing guidelines range, is

unreasonable because the district courtfailed to consider the factors of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) and did not articulate its reasons for the imposition of his sentence.

Throckmorton has not shown that the sentence was unreasonable or that this

court should not defer to the district court’s determinations at sentencing. See

United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2005). Moreover, little

explanation is required when a court imposes a sentence within the advisory

guidelines range. See id.

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance or

dismissal is DENIED. The Government’s alternative request for extension of

time is DENIED as unnecessary. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of 649.com Inc. on form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Glusing, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 10, 2005                                /s/ Mark Glusing
--------------------------------------      ------------------------------------
(Date)                                      Mark Glusing
                                            President, Director
Exhibit
      32  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of NDS Group plc on Form 10-Q for the
        fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned officers of
        NDS Group plc, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of NDS Group plc.
 
 
 
 May
        8,
        2006
 By:  
        Abraham
        Peled
 Abraham
        Peled
 Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 By: Alexander
        Gersh
 Alexander
        Gersh
 Chief
        Financial Officer
   E-5
STATE EX REL. Shannon ALEXANDER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1446

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

*468Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) of UTEK
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: August 4, 2006
Emiliano HEREDIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.