alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Arthur S. Locke III, Chief Financial Officer of
Websense, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18
U.S.C. § 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Websense, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the
period covered by the Quarterly Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 28, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ ARTHUR S. LOCKE III
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Arthur S. Locke III Chief
Financial Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by Websense, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Quarterly Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Websense,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan S. POPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
OPPT -2013-0225 • 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: PAULA 12/3/2014 

COMMENTS: DOCKET 
GENERAL CONTACT REPORT 

Draft I Internal Deliberative 

I. Type of Contact (Telephone, Meeting, etc.): CBI? 

Telephone Yes 

II. EPA Information 

Name(s) of EPA Representative(s): Date/Time: 

Greg Fritz December 2012 

Division/Branch & Phone #: Contact Initiator? 

GF with EETD/ICB (202) 564-8583 Yes 

III. Second Party Information 

Name(s) of Second Party Representative(s): PMN Number I Topic: 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Form U Accession# 

Company & Phone #: Contact Initiator? 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx No 

IV. Summary oflssues Discussed and Comments Received: 

~ The following chemistry issues were discussed after voicemail and email tag. -...,.. 

0 

~ rr1 

Questions: A) In the 2012 CDR Form U you report Accession number " l 

xxxxxxxxxxxxx w -1 

T-' ~ Answer A] ::c: r '?. 

Q B) w 

co 

Answer B] 

Signature of EPA Official: Greg Fritz 

Date December 2012 

.·· 

',·\ 

SANITIZED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water Science School [Bookmark]      

      January 23, 2023    

View Report

Introduction 

The U.S. Geological Survey’s online Water Science School is a one-stop shop for water education resources. In addition to sharing images, data, and diagrams, the Water Science School provides lesson plans for teachers as well as multiple interactive activities for students, such as questionnaires, calculators, and quizzes. This bookmark introduces Drippy, the Water Science School mascot, and shares fun facts about water that can also be found on our website at https://www.usgs.gov/water-science-school.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Tara A Gross

##### IT Specialist

Colorado Water Science Center

tgross@usgs.gov

303-236-6933

## Related Content

#### Tara A Gross

##### IT Specialist

Colorado Water Science Center

tgross@usgs.gov

303-236-6933

### Contact

####               Colorado Water Science Center - Main Office          

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center, Building 53, MS-415Lakewood, CO80225United States

(303) 236-6900

(303) 236-4912
James E. RYBICKI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-820

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Watershed scale response to climate change--Yampa River Basin, Colorado      

      March 19, 2012    

General Circulation Model simulations of future climate through 2099 project a wide range of possible scenarios. To determine the sensitivity and potential effect of long-term climate change on the freshwater resources of the United States, the U.S. Geological Survey Global Change study, "An integrated watershed scale response to global change in selected basins across the United States" was started in 2008. The long-term goal of this national study is to provide the foundation for hydrologically based climate change studies across the nation.

Fourteen basins for which the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System has been calibrated and evaluated were selected as study sites. Precipitation Runoff Modeling System is a deterministic, distributed parameter watershed model developed to evaluate the effects of various combinations of precipitation, temperature, and land use on streamflow and general basin hydrology. Output from five General Circulation Model simulations and four emission scenarios were used to develop an ensemble of climate-change scenarios for each basin. These ensembles were simulated with the corresponding Precipitation Runoff Modeling System model. This fact sheet summarizes the hydrologic effect and sensitivity of the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System simulations to climate change for the Yampa River Basin at Steamboat Springs, Colorado.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Yampa River Basin
                  - Colorado

View All **
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-60198; File No. SR-BX-2009-034]

### Correction

In notice document E9-16036 beginning on page 32212 in the issue of Tuesday, July 7, 2009, make the following correction:

On page 32213, in the third column, in the 17th  line from the top, “July 29, 2009” should read “July 28, 2009”.

[FR Doc. Z9-16036 Filed 7-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Devon BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Bernard PARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3738

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20899 Conference Calendar

__________________ CURTIS MACK LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, M. B. THALER, GEORGE R. PIERSON, R. S. ROBERT, CURTIS D. JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-1225

- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Curtis Mack Lewis appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He argues that prison personnel were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in prohibiting him from kneeling in line while waiting to obtain hisNo. 95-20899 -2- medication. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. On appeal, Lewis can present no legal points arguable on their merits, and the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution Lewis that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Lewis is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
-€.-

' 

March 25,2015 

To: 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

From: 

Stephen Warriner 

39 Pine St. 

PO Box 1819 

7,':~ ~'"1 - 0 .---., " -~-:-' ..• - '1 ! :-- .:: 4 3 

-- - Edgartown;-MA-0:2539-- ----

508-259-3062 

stephen@mvweb.com 

Petitioning for Exemption Under Section 333. FAA authorization to operate a UAS for 

civil (non-governmental) purposes other than for recreation or hobby. This is the new 

FAA streamlined UAS for commercial operation at or below 200 feet. 

I seek relief of operation of a UAS for commercial photography and videography. 

It will benefit the public by flying at a lower altitude and by providing unique views in 

video and photographs. 

Safety will not adversely be affected since the FAA created safety guidelines that will be 

followed. 

The rule is: 

PUBLIC LAW 112-95-FEB. 14,2012 126 STAT. 77 

SEC 336. SPECIAL RULE FOR MODEL AIRCRAFL 

(I) the aircraft is flown strictly for hobby or recreational 

use; .___ __ --------- ---------~------ ~ - ~-- ----- ~-------- ----- --- The exemption requested is to operate a UAS for commercial purposes at or below 200 

feet. 

Thank you. 

Stephen Warriner
Glenn JACKSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0350

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Stricken.
Brian C. HIGHSMITH, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Isabel ELLIOTT, Appellee.

No. 4D18-743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 16, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 32 / Tuesday, February 18, 1997 / Corrections 7299

§ 293.404 [Corrected]

On page 5178, in the third column, in

the last line, ‘‘generally records’’ should

read ‘‘generally not permanent records’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 119

[Docket No. 28154; Notice No. 97-1]

RIN 2120-AG26

Operating Requirements: Domestic,

Flag, Supplemental, Commuter, and

On-Demand Operations: Editorial and

Other Changes

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–2024

beginning on page 5076 in the issue of

Monday, February 3, 1997 make the

following correction:

§ 119.5 [Corrected]

On page 5086, in the third column,

the section heading number should read

as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NO. 07-01-0496 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L C NOVEM BER 21, 2002

______________________________

AMA REGAL, I NC., Appellant
v. AMA RILLO NATIO NAL BANK AND IMA DELL CART ER, AS COTRUSTEE S OF THE JO SEPH INE AN DERSON CHARITA BLE TRUS T, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE320 TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUN TY; NO. 87147-D; HO N. DON E MERS ON, PRE SIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ. ON MOTION T O DISMISS Appellant Am are gal, Inc. and appellee A m arillo National B ank and Im adell Carter , as co-trustees of the Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust, filed a joint motion to dismiss thisappeal because the parties have set tled all m attersin dispute. They further represent thatthe interve nor, the State of Texas, does not oppose the m otion. W ithout passing on the me rits of the case, we grant the m otion to dismiss pursuan t to Texas Rule of Appellate2

Proce dure 42.1(a)(2) and dism iss the appeal. Having dism issed the appeal at ap pell ant’s request, no m otion for rehearing will be entertained, and our m andate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - (-)mississippi(4)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1963        Preliminary report on seismic-reflection studies of crustal structure in the western, central, and southern United States

publication        May 27, 2013        Frequent cross-species transmission of parvoviruses among diverse carnivore hosts

National News Release        December 4, 2014        Get Your Wheels Spinning

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(4) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-FalconeVice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1I, JasonLiddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports onForm 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect ofperiods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill LynchDepositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as awhole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of thelast day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing informationrequired to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included inthese reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by thedepositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreementand based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under thatagreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trusteehave each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to thecompliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similarstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the poolingor servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York andits officers and agents.        Date:  March 26, 2007 /s/ Jason Liddell   Vice President
Elnora MARLER, personal representative of the estate of William Clayton Blackwood, deceased v. William N. SMITH

1150942

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 14, 2017 Reh. denied June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lonny BRISTOW, Petitioner, v. Christina HERNANDEZ, Deputy Sheriff, Linda Nobles, Chief Judge, and William "Bill" Eddins, Escambia County State Attorney, Respondents.

No. 1D18-3437

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
# C_2020203EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9328 – Platinum Equity Group/Multi-Color Corporation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 203/01)

On 11 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9328. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9328. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---