alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Timothy LOWE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1101

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Malcolm X. CROMARTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kasey Lacey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Frank Xavier Moehrle Jr. and Amanda Stokes, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1293AFFIRMED . *Parker v. State* , 18 So.3d 555, 558-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(16)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(349)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(16)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(14)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(115)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(92)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(20)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(27)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149220(2)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(8)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Satellite Imagery Shows Stunning Spread of Australian Fires

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Gell River fire - Tasmania

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Riveaux Road fire - Tasmania

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Great Pine Tier fire - Tasmania
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(4)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oklahoma(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(4)
              - 2023(6)
              - 2022(3)
              - 2021(3)

staff profileJessica Fitzpatrick

staff profileSuzanna Soileau

staff profileHeidi Koehler

staff profileSarah Whipple, PhD
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Rhett S. Williams, certifythat:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VIANET.WORKS, Inc. (“VIA”);

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             VIA’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for VIA and have:

 

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to VIA, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of VIA’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosedin this report any change in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred duringVIA’s most recent fiscal quarter  thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, VIA’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             VIA’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to VIA’s auditors andthe audit committee of VIA’s board of directors:

 

a)             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect VIA’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 10, 2003 |
|--------------------------|
| /s/ RHETT S.  WILLIAMS   |   |
| Rhett S.  Williams       |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit C

Case 21-13242-PDR    Doc 31-3    Filed 07/16/21    Page 1 of 2

Exhibit C

Case 21-13242-PDR    Doc 31-3    Filed 07/16/21    Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Hargopal Singh
    
    
    March 31, 2006Hargopal SinghChief Executive Officer
    
    
    Date
Gabriela BAHAD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5443 

To provide for mandamus actions under chapter 601 of title 49 of the 

United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2016 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Ms. ESHOO, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. TONKO, Mr. SHERMAN, 

and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 

Committees on Energy and Commerce and the Judiciary, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for mandamus actions under chapter 601 of title 

49 of the United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PHMSA Account5 ability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACTIONS BY PRIVATE PERSONS. 

7 Section 60121 of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5443 IH

1 ‘‘(e) MANDAMUS.—A person may bring a civil action 

2 in an appropriate district court of the United States to 

3 compel the Secretary to perform a nondiscretionary duty 

4 under this chapter that the Secretary has failed to per5 form.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 85-184.

#### Stringfellow et al. *v.*Concerned Neighbors in Action et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
## OPPT-2013-0225 • Scanned &Processed in CIS by: PAULA 

# 12/3/2014

COMMENTS: DOCKETGENERAL CONTACT REPORT Draft I Internal Deliberative I. Type ofContact (Telephone, Meeting, etc.): CBI? Telephone Yes II. EPA Information

Name(s) ofEPA Representative(s): Date/Time: Greg Fritz December 2012 Division/Branch & Phone #: Contact Initiator? GF with EETD/ICB (202) 564-8583 Yes III. Second Party Information

Name(s) ofSecond PartyRepresentative(s): PMN Number I Topic: 

### xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Form U Accession# Company & Phone #: ContactInitiator? 

### xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx No IV. Summary oflssues Discussed and Comments Received:**~** The following chemistry issues were discussed after voicemail and email tag. 

# - ...,.. 0**~** rr1 Questions: A) In the 2012 CDR Form U you report Accession number 

# " l 

# xxxxxxxxxxxxx w -1 T-'

## ~ Answer A] 

### ::c: 

# r '?. Q B) 

### w co Answer B] Signature ofEPA Official: Greg Fritz Date December 2012

.··

',·\ 

# SANITIZED
William HUGHES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff of Sarasota County, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2657

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Arthur L. SANDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1466

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) subsidize gray wolves (Canis lupus) during a moose (Alces americanus) decline: A case of apparent competition?      

      December 1, 2016    

Moose (Alces americanus) in northeastern Minnesota have declined by 55% since 2006. Although the cause is unresolved, some studies have suggested that Gray Wolves (Canis lupus) contributed to the decline. After the Moose decline, wolves could either decline or switch prey. To determine which occurred in our study area, we compared winter wolf counts and summer diet before and after the Moose decline. While wolf numbers in our study area nearly doubled from 23 in winter 2002 to an average of 41 during winters 2011–2013, calf:cow ratios (the number of calves per cow observed during winter surveys) in the wider Moose range more than halved from 0.93 in 2002 to an average of 0.31 during 2011–2013. Compared to summer 2002, wolves in summers 2011–2013 consumed fewer Moose and more White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus). While deer densities were similar during each period, average vulnerability, as reflected by winter severity, was greater during 2011–2013 than 2002, probably explaining the wolf increase. During the wolf increase Moose calves remained a summer food item. These findings suggest that in part of the Moose range, deer subsidized wolf numbers while wolves also preyed on Moose calves. This contributed to a Moose decline and is a possible case of apparent competition and inverse-density-dependent predation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Shannon Barber-Meyer, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

#### David Mech, PhD

##### Senior Research Scientist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

david_mech@usgs.gov

651-647-0408

## Related Content

####             Shannon Barber-Meyer, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

#### David Mech, PhD

##### Senior Research Scientist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

david_mech@usgs.gov

651-647-0408

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Clifford M. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant certify, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Clifford M. Gross  
| |  |                        
| |  | Name: Clifford M. Gross
| |  | Date: November 13, 2002

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Clifford M. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Clifford M. Gross         
|Name: Clifford M. Gross, Ph.D.
|Date: November 3, 2006
**Exhibit 32**

 

**WrittenStatement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of VIA NET.WORKS, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, tohis knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b) the information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Rhett S. Williams   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Rhett S. Williams       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | November 12, 2004  |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Cameron Mackenzie   |   |
|   | Cameron Mackenzie       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 12, 2004  |
|        |                         |        |  |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Surface properties of the Mars Science Laboratory candidate landing sites: characterization from orbit and predictions      

      August 1, 2012    

This work describes the interpretation of THEMIS-derived thermal inertia data at the Eberswalde, Gale, Holden, and Mawrth Vallis Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) candidate landing sites and determines how thermophysical variations correspond to morphology and, when apparent, mineralogical diversity. At Eberswalde, the proportion of likely unconsolidated material relative to exposed bedrock or highly indurated surfaces controls the thermal inertia of a given region. At Gale, the majority of the landing site region has a moderate thermal inertia (250 to 410 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2), which is likely an indurated surface mixed with unconsolidated materials. The primary difference between higher and moderate thermal inertia surfaces may be due to the amount of mantling material present. Within the mound of stratified material in Gale, layers are distinguished in the thermal inertia data; the MSL rover could be traversing through materials that are both thermophysically and compositionally diverse. The majority of the Holden ellipse has a thermal inertia of 340 to 475 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 and consists of bed forms with some consolidated material intermixed. Mawrth Vallis has a mean thermal inertia of 310 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 and a wide variety of materials is present contributing to the moderate thermal inertia surfaces, including a mixture of bedrock, indurated surfaces, bed forms, and unconsolidated fines. Phyllosilicates have been identified at all four candidate landing sites, and these clay-bearing units typically have a similar thermal inertia value (400 to 500 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2), suggesting physical properties that are also similar.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
Marc KOVENS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The GABLES CONDOMINIUM AND CLUB ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Luis Miguel Marsh, Appellant

No. 06-12-00082-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

0921391). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Luis Miguel Marsh, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 20, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDWARD LOWE BAKER, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 93 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Adrian MADRIGAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-63

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
M.A.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1837

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Michael ALFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Sustainable aquifer management for food security      

      March 2, 2023    

In aquifer-dependent regions, balancing aquifer protection, desalination, economic development, agricultural irrigation, and food security can be better managed through discovery and development of sources of sustainable groundwater pumping. Aquifer desalination for irrigation to protect food security can mitigate pressure on local freshwater aquifers. Despite its importance, little peer reviewed work to date has identified the economic capacity to pay for aquifer desalination for irrigation to mitigate freshwater aquifer drawdown. The novel contribution of this work is the development and application of an innovative method to assess the economic capacity to pay for aquifer desalination for irrigation for a recently discovered large saline aquifer. It develops an original framework to assess the capacity to pay for aquifer desalination, the results of which can help guide policymakers on efficient and sustainable pumping approaches across users, aquifers, and time periods. A mathematical programming model is developed to economically analyze the 200 billion cubic meter Lotikipi Aquifer, discovered in 2013 in northern Kenya using modern remote sensing methods. While initial pumping of the Lotikipi Aquifer was halted due to high groundwater salinity levels, interest remains strong in assessing the economic capacity to pay for groundwater desalination because of its potential role in protecting regional food security generated by aquifer pumping for irrigation. The model is formulated by calibrating optimized pumping patterns in two existing freshwater aquifers to replicate observed historical pumping levels. Based on that exercise, a second model is developed to identify a least cost set of pumping restrictions that return each of three regional aquifers to starting conditions over a seven-year time period. A third model extends the second by adding a constraint of a minimum required level of food grain security supported by irrigation pumping from the aquifer system. Results show that the economic capacity to pay for aquifer desalination for irrigated agriculture lies in the range of $0.08 - $0.18 USD per cubic meter under current economic conditions and desalination technologies available. While this economic capacity to pay is lower than its current cost in most places, the future could be more optimistic. Advances in desalination technology, higher crop prices, technical advance in agriculture, and development of drought-resistant crops can all contribute to a future capacity to economically justify the expense of desalination.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Kenya

View All **
Hector Ramos SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-547

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)
              - montana(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 16, 2020        Comet NEOWISE and the Roosevelt Arch at Yellowstone National Park

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Program        October 1, 2018        IAU - WGCCRE

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic