alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Part 312

[INS No. 1702-96]
RIN 1115-AE02


Exceptions to the Education Requirements for Naturalization for 
Certain Applicants

Correction

    In final rule document 97-6686 beginning on page 12915 in the issue 
of March 19, 1997 make the following corrections:


Sec. 312.1  [Corrected]

    (1) On page 12923, in Sec. 312.1(b)(3), in the second column, in 
the first paragraph:
    (a) In the sixteenth line ``form'' should read ``from''.
    (b) In the seventh line from the bottom of the paragraph 
``requirements of English'' should read ``requirements for English''.
    (c) In the fourth line from the bottom of the paragraph ``even with 
reasonable modifications to the methods of determining English 
proficiency'' was inadvertently repeated.


Sec. 312.2  [Corrected]

    (3) On the same page, in Sec. 312.2(b)(1), in the second column: 
    (a) In the seventh line ``Untied stated'' should read ``United 
States''.
    (b) In the fourth line from the bottom of the paragraph ``results 
form'' should read ``results from''.
    (2) On the same page, in Sec. 312.2(b)(2), in the third column:
    (a) In the twelth line ``Untied States'' should read ``United 
States''.
    (b) In the seventeenth line ``Neutralization'' should read 
``Naturalization''.
    (c) In the penultimate line ``purpose'' should read ``purposes''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Billy COMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit      32 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| May              1,              2007 |                                                |                                |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                |                                |
|                                       | By:                                       | /s/ Abraham              Peled |
|                                  | Abraham                Peled                        |
|                                  | Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |

|   |                                   |                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|        | By:                          | /s/ Alexander              Gersh |
|   | Alexander                Gersh         |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0524**

**Contacts.** Wi th whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
Suzanne M. CHILLARI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Salvatori CHILLARI, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Carlos CAMEJO and Allyn Vento, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re City Vision National Revitalization, LLC Case No. 21-21042-MAM

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S) - AMENDED

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 3,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 3,000.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

January 31, 2022 /s/ Joshua M. Liszt

Date Joshua M. Liszt 0725811

Signature of Attorney

Liszt Law, PA

1095 Broken Sound Parkway, NW

Suite 100

Boca Raton, FL

561-400-9053

josh@oceantitle.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-21042-MAM Doc 16 Filed 01/31/22 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 96250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28381]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreement to 
the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by mail, Federal 
Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. 
Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 
days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, and the 
Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on 
agreements that request expedited review. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
[email protected].
    Agreement No.: 201436.
    Title: MSC/Zim Cooperative Working Agreement.
    Parties: Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. and Zim Integrated 
Shipping Services Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O'Connor; 2001 M Street NW, Suite 
500; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes the Parties to operate jointly a 
string of vessels between Asia and the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts 
and to exchange space on five (5) other services operated individually 
by one Party or the other. The geographic scope of the Agreement is the 
trade between ports on the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts on the one 
hand and ports in Singapore, Thailand, China, Vietnam, South Korea, 
Panama, Colombia, Mexico, Jamaica and the Bahamas on the other hand. 
The Agreement would replace FMC Agreement No. 201263 when that 
agreement is terminated following the end of the Maersk/MSC Vessel 
Sharing Agreement (2M Alliance) in early 2025.
    Proposed Effective Date: January 9, 2025.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/86581.

    Dated: November 29, 2024.
Alanna Beck,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-28381 Filed 12-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
```
•CERIFINALREPORTJune,2010ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumberSTATEMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumberSTA1EMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeCON1ENfS-1--2--3--4--5--6--7--8--9--10--11--12--13--14--15--16--17-Appendix1-lAppcndixl--2Appendixl--3Appendixl-Appendix2-1Appendix2--2Appcndix2--3Appendix2--4Appcndix2--5Appendix2-Additionaldata-IAdditionaldata--2Additionaldata-
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Colorado

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(14)
              - alaska(37)
              - arizona(945)
              - arkansas(27)
              - california(436)
              - colorado(3787)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(12)
              - georgia(24)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(217)
              - illinois(18)
              - indiana(10)
              - iowa(38)
              - kansas(190)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(18)
              - maine(10)
              - maryland(10)
              - massachusetts(16)
              - (-)michigan(8)
              - minnesota(33)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(47)
              - montana(240)
              - nebraska(186)
              - nevada(333)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(9)
              - new mexico(667)
              - new york(21)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(97)
              - ohio(15)
              - oklahoma(119)
              - oregon(154)
              - pennsylvania(18)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(4)
              - south carolina(7)
              - south dakota(156)
              - tennessee(13)
              - texas(249)
              - utah(851)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(24)
              - washington(135)
              - west virginia(8)
              - wisconsin(25)
              - wyoming(549)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1987        Habitat Suitability Index Models: Greater sandhill crane

National News Release        December 15, 2014        Urban Stream Contamination Increasing Rapidly Due to Road Salt

publication        January 1, 2010        Considerations for developing wolf harvesting regulations in the contiguous United States

publication        September 26, 2013        Design tradeoffs for trend assessment in aquatic biological monitoring programs

publication        January 1, 1980        Organochlorine pesticide, PCB, and PBB residues and necropsy data for bald eagles from 29 states - 1975-77

publication        May 8, 2020        A review of pathogens, diseases, and contaminants of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in North America

publication        June 7, 2012        A brief history and summary of the effects of river engineering and dams on the Mississippi River system and delta

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00212-CR

IN RE TERRY LEE NELSON

Original Proceeding

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. 32,660-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In what we are treating as an original proceeding,1 Terry Lee Nelson has filed a 

“motion for forensic DNA testing after conviction.” We dismiss the motion for lack of 

jurisdiction; such a motion is to be filed in the convicting court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 64.01(a-1) (West Supp. 2013) (providing for filing of motion for DNA 

testing in convicting court).

 

1 The motion lacks proof of service. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all 

parties (i.e., the district attorney) and must contain proof of service. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 52.2. To expedite 

this matter, we implement Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend these requirements. Id. 2.
In re Nelson Page 2

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 7, 2014

Do not publish

[OT06]
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      11

<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2001-12
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-27


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (the "Master Servicer") and do hereby
further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12
[Cite as Fields v. Police Pub. Records Section, 2020-Ohio-4905.]

{¶1} On May 21, 2020, a special master issued a report and recommendation 

(R&R) regarding a public-records dispute in this case. The special master recommends 

that the court find: (1) requester’s claims for production of records have been rendered 

moot by production subsequent to the filing of requester’s complaint, and by requester's 

demonstrated possession of the only redacted portions of those records; (2) requester 

has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that any additional responsive 

records existed in respondent’s possession at the time of requester’s request; and (3) 

court costs should be assessed equally between the parties. 

{¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the R&R, as permitted by 

R.C. 2743.75(F)(2) and tolled by 2020 Am.Sub.H.B. No. 197. Pursuant to R.C. 

2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and 

recommendation, this court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the 

report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other 

defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” 

{¶3} Upon review of the special master’s R&R of May 21, 2020, the court 

determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the R&R. 

The court adopts the special master’s R&R, including the special master’s findings of 

fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the R&R. Judgment is 

rendered in favor of respondent. Court costs are assessed equally between the parties 

LARRY D. FIELDS 

 Requester 

 v. 

POLICE PUBLIC RECORDS SECTION 

 Respondent 

Case No. 2019-01143PQ 

Judge Patrick M. McGrath 

JUDGMENT ENTRY 
Case No. 2019-01143PQ -2- ENTRY 

in accordance with the special master’s recommendation. The clerk shall serve upon all 

parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. 

 

 PATRICK M. MCGRATH 

 Judge 

Filed August 11, 2020 

Sent to S.C. Reporter 10/12/20
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - (-)indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        November 1, 2023        National- to continental-scale governmental geophysical efforts for critical mineral mapping, USA
**EXHIBIT 3.3**

**AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF**

**BGR CORPORATION**

**DATED DECEMBER 16, 2004**

The amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation shall be filed with the Nevada Secretary of State so that the Article I of the Articles of Incorporation shall be as follows: 

“The name of the Corporation shall be “Franchise Capital Corporation”.

Article III of the Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to read, in part, as follows:

"The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 5,030,000,000 which shall consist of 5,000,000,000 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), and 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share (the "Preferred Stock")......

A new Article IX of the Articles of Incorporation shall be added and shall read in its entirety as follows:

 “The board of directors, without the consent of the stockholders of the corporation, may adopt any recapitalization affecting the outstanding shares of capital stock of the corporation by effecting a forward or reverse split of all of the outstanding shares of any class of capital stock of the corporation, with appropriate adjustments to the corporation’s capital accounts, provided that the recapitalization does not affect the ratio of unissued to authorized capital stock of that class.”
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(8)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1991        In situ 10Be-26Al exposure ages at Meteor Crater, Arizona

publication        December 8, 2016        Transformations to granular zircon revealed: Twinning, reidite, and ZrO2 in shocked zircon from Meteor Crater (Arizona, USA)

publication        August 7, 1974        Guidebook to the geology of Meteor Crater, Arizona

publication        January 1, 1959        Impact mechanics at Meteor Crater, Arizona

publication        December 1, 1980        Measurements of shock-induced luminescence at Meteor Crater, Arizona, from laboratory and airborne Fraunhofer line-discriminator systems

publication        January 1, 1991        Age and geomorphic history of Meteor Crater, Arizona, from cosmogenic 36Cl and 14C in rock varnish

publication        January 1, 1960        First natural occurrence of coesite

publication        January 1, 2005        Geochemical and C, O, Sr, and U-series isotopic evidence for the meteoric origin of calcrete at Solitario Wash, Crater Flat, Nevada, USA

publication        September 1, 1963        Hypervelocity impact of steel into Coconino Sandstone

publication        January 1, 1997        Secrets of the Wabar craters

publication        March 1, 2000        The effects of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater on the geologic framework and the correlation of hydrogeologic units of southeastern Virginia, south of the James River

publication        August 3, 2017        Oxygen and U-Th isotopes and the timescales of hydrothermal exchange and melting in granitoid wall rocks at Mount Mazama, Crater Lake, Oregon

publication        January 1, 2009        Description of Tessaracoccus profundi sp.nov., a deep-subsurface actinobacterium isolated from a Chesapeake impact crater drill core (940 m depth)

publication        December 30, 2020        Outburst floods

publication        October 1, 2014        Dynamics of the Yellowstone hydrothermal system

publication        January 1, 1998        U. S. Geolgogical Survey Flagstaff Field Center

publication        January 1, 1986        Meteoroids and impact craters

Illustrations        December 31, 2019        Arizona Landsat State Mosaic
Brian WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Danielle Renee Rufai, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, as the State properly concedes, the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion while his direct appeal was pending. *See, e.g.* , *Liranzo-Cruzata v. State* , 6 So.3d 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Mowatt v. State* , 963 So.2d 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We therefore reverse the order denying Appellant's rule 3.800(c) motion and remand for the trial court to enter a new order on Appellant's aforementioned motion.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.