REPORT OF 

PARTICULATE SO2 AND FLUORIDE 

EMISSIONS TESTS FOR 

BORAL BRICKS 

NO. 1 BRICK KILN 

Macon, Mississippi 

April 22, 1999 

Boral Bricks 

Route 4, Box 2 

Macon, Mississippi 39341 

contact: Burt Sasser 

ph: 800/748-8888 

Boral Bricks 

P.O. Box 1178 

Columbus, Georgia 31902 

contact: David Johnson 

ph: 334/480-2487 

Performed By: 

Environmental Monitoring Laboratories 

Ridgeland, Mississippi 

•601/856-3092 3• 
Emission Factor Development 

Emission Factor Develop for Stack Testing at Boral Bricks. Macon. MS Plant on Aoril 22. 1999 

by Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Ridgeland MS 

Schedule: 1.67 cars/hr 

3,168 brick/car 

Brick Weight: 3.49 Ib/fired brick 

(40 cars/day schedule at time of stack testing) 

(verified by quality control reports) 

1.67 ea• 3,168 l)r-,isk. 3.49 

hr 

ton 

200011• 

Emission Factor Develonment: 

filterable PM Average Emission Rate (Ib PM hr) 

Kiln Throughput (ton hr) 

1.51 Ib 1• 

I• 9.23 ton 

filterable PM 0.16 Ib/ton 

Emission Factor Summary_: 

Pollutant Avg. Emission Rate Avg. Emission Factor 

PM 1.51 Ib/hr 

SO 6.93 Ib/hr • 

Total Fluorides 3.57 Ib/hr 

HF emissions can be conservatively assumed to equal between 90 and 95% of the Total Fluorides emissions. 

Page 1 
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, 

P.O. Box 655 D 624 Ridgewood Road phone: 601/856-3092 

Ridgeland, Mississippi 39158 ./bx 601/853-2151 

June 3, 1999 

Subject: Boral Bricks. Macon, Mississippi 

On April 22, 1999, Environmental Monitoring Laboratories performed air emissions testing for 

Boral Bricks in Macon, Mississippi. Testing was performed to determine emissions of 

particulate matter, sulfur dioxide and total fluoride (as HF) from the No. 1 Brick Kiln at the 

request of Boral Bricks. 

Test results: 

Particulate Emissions SO2 Emissions Fluoride Emissions 

#/hr. grains/dscf #/hr. ppm #/hr. ppm 

1.51 0.014 6.93 57 3.57 99 

Mr. David Johnson of Boral Bricks coordinated the testing project. Brad McKnight of 

Environmental-lVIonitoring Laboratories was responsible for sample collection. Danny Russell 

of Environmental Monitoring Laboratories was responsible for particulate analysis and for 

report preparation. Fluoride samples were shipped to Oxford Laboratories in Wilmington, 

North Carolina for analysis. Otherwise, sample custody was limited to Mr. McKnight and Mr. 

Russell. 

Following is a report of the test. 
REPORT OF PARTICULATE, SO2 AND FLUORIDE EMISSIONS TESTS 

BORAL BRICKS NO. 1 BRICK KILN 

MACON, MISSISSIPPI 

APRIL 22, 1999 

CONTENTS 

1.0 TEST RESULTS page 1 

2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION 2 

3.0 TEST PROCEDURES 2 

4.0 DATA REDUCTION 3 

5.0 NOMENCLATURE 6 

6.0 CALIBRATION 7 

7.0 APPENDICES: 8 

A. Field and Laboratory Data 

B. Calibrations 

C. Fluoride Analysis Report (Oxford) 

REPORT CERTIFICATION 

I certify that I have examined the information submitted herein, 

and based upon inquires of those responsible for obtaining the 

data or upon my direct acquisition of data, I believe the 

submitted information is true, accurate and complete. 

Daniel G. Russell 
1.0 Test Results: The following table is a technical summary of the measured flow 

parameters and test results for particulate, SO2, and fluoride emissions testing done on April 

22, 1999 for Boral Brick's No. 1 Brick Kiln in Macon, Mississippi. 

Run No 

Time Start 

Time End 

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS 

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS 

SO2 EMISSIONS 

SO2 EMISSIONS 

F1 EMISSIONS 

F1 EMISSIONS 

VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE 

VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE 

VELOCITY 

STACK TEMPERATURE 

MOISTURE 

SAMPLE RATE 

#/hr 

gr/dscf 

#/hr 

ppm 

#/hr 

ppm 

ft./sec. 

% isokinetic 

1 

4/22/99 

1009 

1109 

1.42 

0.013 

8.86 

71.9 

3.93 

107.4 

22070 

12370 

40.6 

398 

8.3 

2 3 

4/22/99 4/22/99 

1119 1228 

1120 1329 

1.68 

0.016 

6.80 

55.8 

3.57 

98.5 

21892 

12226 

40.3 

404 

8.0 

1.42 

0.014 

5.12 

42.5 

3.21 

89.9 

21860 

12079 

40.2 

408 

8.5 

100 

AVG. 

0.014 

6.93 

56.7 

3.57 

98.6 

40.4 

106 100 102 

1.51 
2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Source description here is limited to a description of 

the stacks and sampling site. Boral Bricks may be consulted for detailed descriptions of the 

process and of operating conditions during the test 

The No. 1..Brick Kiln exhausts to the atmosphere by way of a 40.75 inch diameter vertical 

stack extending through the roof of the building housing the kiln. Two sample ports at 90 ° 

are provided at a location 37.5 inches below the stack exit and 114 inches above the point 

where the fan duct enters the stack. 

3.0 TEST PROCEDURES: Test procedures used are those described in the Code of 

Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A.. Specifically, Method 1 was used to 

determine the number of sample points and Methods 5, 6 and 26A were used to measure 

velocity, moisture, and particulate, SO2 and fluoride emissions. The Method 6 option of using 

the particulate sample train for SO2 determination was used. Sample duration was 60 minutes 

for each of triplicate samples. 

Filters were recovered by rinsing the front half of the filter holder into the probe wash and 

securing the filters in glass petri dishes. Part of the sample filter normally adheres to the filter 

gasket, and some of the adhering material is recovered into the probe wash. Therefore some of 

the filter weight is attributed to the probe wash weight. Filters were heated in an oven for 2 

hours at 105 C, desiccated at least 24 hours and weighed to constant weight. Probe wash 

samples•in acetone were e•zaporated_to dryness•ver low heat in tared_beakers, desiccated format 

least 24 hours and weighed to constant weight. Weighings were made at 6 hour or greater 

intervals (samples stored in desiccator). Final weights were considered valid and were recorded 

if there was no more than 0.5 milligrams difference from the previous weighing. 

The back half samples in 3% hydrogen peroxide distilled water were recovered and an aliquot 

removed for sulfur dioxide analysis. Following gravimetric analysis for particulate, the filter 

and probe wash residue was added to the impinger catch. Those samples were shipped Oxford 

Laboratories for analysis by IC-HPLC as described in Method 13. 
4.0 DATA REDUCTION 
4 

Boral Bricks 

No.1 Brick Kiln 

PM/F1 Emissions Test April 22, 1999 

Collected Test Data: RUN RUN 2 RUN 3 

Date 4/22/99 4/22/99 4/22/99 

Time start 1009 1119 1228 

Time end 1109 1120 1329 

1. As sq ft 9.0570 9.0570 9.0570 

2. Dn in. 0.336 0.336 0.336 

3. Cp dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84 

4. Theta minutes 60.00 60.00 60.00 

s. 

y dimensionless 1.01 1.01 1.01 

6. Pbar in. Hg 

z 

pg in. H20 

8. Vm cf (dry gas) 

9. sqr(AP),avg in.H20^.5 0.5501 

lo. AH in. H20 2.8308 2.5125 2.4625 

11. 

ts degrees F 397.71 404.21 408.29 

12. 

tm degrees F 77.17 79.71 82.83 

18. Vlc ml 103 92 98 

14. CO2 percent 2.50 2.50 2.50 

15. 02 percent 18.00 18.00 18.00 

is CO percent 0.00 0.00 

17. M,PM milligrams 

18. M,F milligrams 

29.74 29.74 29.74 

-0.22 -0.22 -0.22 

53.577 50.491 50.337 

0.5590 0.5528 

0.00 

46.1 51.8 44.1 

128.00 110.00 99.50 

403.40 

SO2 Sample Weight Determination 

Coll•ata 

Vsoln ml 500 500 500 

'Va ml 10 10 10 

Calculation 

RUN NO. 2 3 

M,SO2 

N(Vt-Vtb)(Vsoln/Va)(32.03 mg/meq) 288.27 209.80 158.55 

RUN N0. 2 

Vt-Vtb ml 18 13.1 9.9 

N meq./ml 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 
Boral Bricks 

No. 1 Brick Kiln 

PM/F1 Emissions Test April 22, 1999 

Calculations: RUN RUN 2 RUN 3 AVG. 

•. Pm in.Hg 

(DH/13.6)+Pbar 29.9481 29.9247 29.9211 

z Ps in. Hg 

(Pg/13.6)+Pbar 29.7238 29.7238 29.7238 

3. An sq ft 

((Oral24)^2)(3.1416 6.16E-04 6.16E-04 6.16E-04 

4. Vmstd dscf 

Vm Y(Pm/Pstd)(Tstd/Tm) 53.239 49.897 49.453 50.863 

s. Vwstd scf 

(.04707cf/ml)(Vlc) 4.848 4.330 4.613 

6. Bws dimensionless 

Vwstd/(Vwstd+Vmstd) 0.0835 0.0799 0.0853 0.0829 

z Md mol.wt, dry basis 

.44 co2+.32 O2+.28(CO+N2) 29.12 29.12 29.12 

s. Ms mol.wt, wet basis 

Md(1-Bws)+l 8 Bws 28.19 28.23 28.17 

9. Vs ft/sec 

Kp Cp (sqrDP)sqr(Ts/(Ps Ms)) 40.61 40.29 40.23 40.37 

lo. Q cfm 

Vs As(60 sec/min) 22070 21892 21860 21940 

•' Qstw scfm 

Q(Ps/Pstd)(Tstd/Ts) 13497 13287 13206 13330 

•2. Qstd dscfm 

Qstw(1-Bws) 12370 12226 12079 12225 

• I percent 

[(100 Ts)(.002669 Vlc+(Vm Pm/Tm)]/(60 theta Vs Ps An) 105.51 100.05 100.37 101.98 

Particulate Emissions 

1. E,PM pounds/hr 

(M,PM/Vmstd)(Qstd)(60)/(453590) 1.42 1.68 1.42 1.51 

z C,PM grains/dscf 

(M,PM/Vmstd)(.Ot54 grainslrng) 0.O13• •.0•60 •137 0_0144• 

S02 Emissions 

•- E,SO2 pounds/hr 

(M,S O2/Vmstd)(Qstd)(60)/(453590) 8.86 6.80 5.12 6.93 

z C,SO ppm 

(M,S O2/Vms td)(13.27) 71.9 55.8 42.5 56.7 

Fluoride Emissions 

1. E,F pounds/hr 

(M,Fl/Vmstd)(Qstd)(60)/(453590) 3.93 3.57 3.21 3.57 

z C,F ppm 

(M,Fl/Vmstd)(44.68) 107.4 98.5 89.9 98.6 
5 

5.0 NOMENCLATURE 

SYMBOL UNITS 

As t2 

Bws dimensionless 

CO• 

CO 

Cp 

C,X 

percent 

percent 

dimensionless 

as labeled 

Nozzle cross sectional area 

Stack cross sectional area 

Wet gas fraction 

Carbon dioxide content by volume 

Carbon monoxide content by volume 

Pitot correction factor 

Concentration of pollutant X 

DGF dimensionless Dry gas fraction 

Dn inches Nozzle diameter 

All in. I-IzO Pressure drop across meter orifice 

AP in. FIfO Stack gas velocity pressure 

E,X #/hr 

E'X #/MM Btu 

F dscf 

percent 

consistent 

milligrams 

#/#mole 

M,X 

Md 

Emission rate of pollutant X 

Emission rate of pollutant X 

Volume of flue gas per MM Btu 

Nozzle velocity/stack gas velocity 

DESCRIPTION 

Pitot tube constant 

Sample weight of pollutant X 

Dry molecular weight of stack gas 

Ms #/# mole Wet molecular weight of stack gas 

N2 9ercent Nitrogen content by volume, dry basis 

O percent Oxygen content by volume, dry basis 

in. Hg 

Pg in. Hg 

Pm in, Hg 

Ps in. Hg 

Barometric pressure 

Stack static pressure 

Total pressure at meter (Pbar+(DH/13.6) 

Pstd 

Q 

Qstcl 

Qstdw 

Total stack pressure (Pbar+(Pg/13.6)) 

in. Hg Standard barometric pressure 29.92 

acfm Volumetric flow rate at stack conditions 

d•cfrn Volumetric flow rate at standard condi•ons•dry basis 

scfm 

minutes 

Volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, wet basis 

Sample duration 

tan °F Meter temperature (Txn denotes "R) 

ts °F Stack temperature (Ts denotes "R) 

Tstd °R Standard temperature 528°R 

Vlc ml volume of water collected 

Vm ft Volume of dry gas sampled through meter 

Vmstd dscf 

Vwstd scf 

Y dimensionless 

Sample volume at standard conditions 

Sample volume of water vapor 

Meter coefficient 

Xsair percent Excess air 
6.0 CALIBRATIONS: 

Measurement devices used by Environmental Monitoring Laboratories and subject to changes in measurement 

precision are initially calibrated prior to use. Those instruments for which calibration factors are subject to change or 

for which calibration checks are required, are calibrated following each field use or as otherwise directed and noted. 

Calibration procedures for specific equipment are as follows. 

Dry Gas Meter: 

Dry gas meters are periodically removed from the sampling consoles and cleaned and repaired (new gaskets etc. as 

required). Following the overhaul of a meter, the measuring precision is checked by the Bell Prover Method and 

adjusted when necessary to read to within 2% of 100% accuracy. This service is provided by Big Three Meter 

Company in Jackson, Mississippi. Overhaul service or any six month period is followed by a five point calibration 

described in APTD-0576 using either a wet test meter or calibrated dry gas meter (used exclusively for calibrations) as 

a standard reference. Following field use, a gas meter calibration is checked in one of two ways. [1] Three calibration 

checks at intermediate orifice settings are performed or [2] orifice meter coefficients are used. 

If a meter coefficient obtained from pre-test and post-test checks differs by more than 5%, the coefficient (Y) giving the 

lower sample volume is used in the calculations. 

Orifice: 

The orifice coefficient is initially determined and is rechecked following a major gas meter repair and calibration. 

Nozzles: 

Nozzles are checked before each field use with a precision (.001 in.) dial caliper. Three measurements on different axes 

are made; an average of those three readings is used in calculations. If the tolerance among measurements exceeds 

0.004 inches (highest to lowest reading) the nozzle is repaired and recalibrated or discarded. 

Pitot Tubes: 

Pitot tubes meeting EPA geometry standards are assigned a coefficient of 0.84. Pitot tubes are visually inspected for 

damage before, during and after use. Those pitot tubes not meeting the geometry standards are assigned a coefficient 

from the manufacturer's calibration which it retains unless damaged. All pitot tubes used by Environmental Monitoring 

Laboratories are manufactured by NuTech, Inc. 

Temperature Measuring Instruments: 

All temperature measurements are made with type K thermocouples and digital thermocouple thermometers, which 

have an initial calibration traceable to NBS. Thermocouples are checked during a test series against an ASTM mercury 

in glass thermometer at ambient temperature. Continuity and proper thermocouple contact location are checked by 

challenging the thermocouple with a temperature change. (EMTIC GD-028 June 21, 1994) 

Barometer: 

Aneroid field barometers are checked against and adjusted to readings from a mercury barometer or readings obtained 

from local weather authorities. 

Differential Pressure Gauges: 

Velocity head (delta P) and orifice pressure differential (delta H) measurements are made using water manometers of 

the appropriate range unless otherwise noted in the test data. Manometers do not require calibration. 
REPORT OF 

PARTICULATE SO2 AND FLUORIDE 

EMISSIONS TESTS FOR 

BORAL BRICKS 

NO. 1 BRICK KILN 

Macon, Mississippi 

April 22, 1999 

Boral Bricks 

Route 4, Box 2 

Macon, Mississippi 39341 

contact: Burt Sasser 

ph: 800/748-8888 

Boral Bricks 

P.O. Box 1178 

Columbus, Georgia 31902 

contact: David Johnson 

ph: 334/480-2487 

Pe.rformed By: 

Environmental Monitoring Laboratories 

Ridgeland, Mississippi 

•'601/856-3092 )a 
Emission Factor Development 

Emission Factor Oeveloo for Sfa•-k Testino_ at Boral Bricks. Macon. MS P;a•t on ADHI 22. by Environmental Monitoring Laboratories, Ridge•and MS 

Schedule: 1.67 carslhr 

3,168 brick/car 

Brick Weight: 3.49 Ib/fired brick 

(40 cars/day schedule at time of stack testing) 

(verified by quality control reports) 

1.67 saF 

hr 

3,168 brisk 3.49 tb 

9.23 ton/hr 

ton 

2000tb 

Emission Factor Develooment; 

filterable PM Average Emission Rate (Ib PM / hr) 

Kiln Throughput (ton / hr) 

1.51 Ib k• 

k• 9.23 ton 

filterable PM 0.16 Ib/ton 

Emission Factor Summary, 

Pollutant Avg. Emission R•e IAvg. Em!_=_,=!on Factor 

PM 1.51 Ib/hr 0.16 Ib/ton 

!SO2 6.93 Ib/hr 0.75 Ib/ton 

Total Fluorides 3.57 Ib/hr 0;39 Ib/ton 

HF emissions can be conservatively assumed to equal between 90 and 95% of the Total Fluorides emissions. 

Page I 
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 

P.O. Box655 D 624 Ridgewood Road 

Ridgeland, Mississippi 39158 

LABORATORIES, 

phone: 601/856-3092 

fax 601/853-2151 

June 3, 1999 

Subject: Boral Bricks. Macon, Mississippi 

On April 22, 1999, Environmental Monitoring Laboratories performed air emissions testing for 

Boral Bricks in Macon, Mississippi. Testing was performed to determine emissions of 

particulate matter, sulfur dioxide and total fluoride (as HF) from the No. 1 Brick Kiln at the 

request of Boral Bricks. 

Test results: 

Particulate Emissions 

1.51 

grains/dscf 

0.014 

S02 Emissions 

ppm 

6.93 57 

Mr. David Johnson of Boral Bricks coordinated the testing project. 

Fluoride Emissions 

ppm 

3.57 99 

Brad McKnight of 

Environmental Monitoring Laboratories was responsible for sample collection. Danny Russell 

of Environmental Monitoring Laboratories was responsible for particulate analysis and for 

report preparation. Fluoride samples were shipped to Oxford Laboratories in Wilmington, 

Norffi Carolina for analysis. Otherwise, sample custody was limited to Mr. McKnight and Mr. 

Russell. 

Following is a report of the test. 
REPORT OF PARTICULATE, SO2 AND FLUORIDE EMISSIONS TESTS 

MACON, MISSISSIPPI 

APRIL 22, 1999 

CONTENTS 

1.0 TEST RESULTS 

2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION 

3.0 TEST PROCEDURES 

4.0 DATA REDUCTION 

5.0 NOMENCLATURE 

6.0 CALIBRATION 

7.0 APPENDICES: 

A. Field and Laboratory Data 

B. Calibrations 

C. Fluoride Analysis Report (Oxford) 

page 1 

2 

2 

3 

6 

7 

8 

REPORT CERTIFICATION 

I certify that I have examined the information submitted herein, 

data or upon my direct acquisition of data, I believe the 

submitted information is true, accurate and complete. 

Signed 

Daniel O. Russell 
1.0 Test Results: The following table is a technical .summary of the measured flow 

parameters and test results for particulate, SO2, and fluoride emissions testing done on April 

22, 1999 for Boral Brick's No. 1 Brick Kiln in Macon, Mississippi. 

Run No 1 2 3 AVG. 

Date 4/22/99 4/22/99 4/22/99 

Time Start 1009 1119 1228 

Time End 1109 1120 1329 

PARTICULATE EMIS S IONS 

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS 

SO2 EMISSIONS 

SO2 EMISSIONS 

F1 EMISSIONS 

F1 EMISSIONS 

:VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE 

VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE 

VELOCITY 

STACK TEMPERATURE 

MOISTURE 

SAMPLE RATE 

#/hr 

gr/dscf 

#/hr 

ppm 

#/hr 

ppm 

acfm 

dscfm 

ft./sec. 

F 

% 

% isokinetic 

1.42 

0.013 

8.86 

71.9 

3.93 

107.4 

22070 

12370 

40.6 

398 

8.3 

106 

1.68 

0.016 

6.80 

55.8 

3.57 

98.5 

21892 

12226 

40.3 

404 

8.0 

100 

1.42 

0.014 

5.12 

42.5 

3.21 

89.9 

21860 

12079 

40.2 

408 

8.5 

100 

1.51 

0.014 

6.93 

56.7 

3.57 

98.6 

21940 

12225 

40.4 

403 

8.3 

102 
2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Source description here is limited to a description of 

the stacks and sampling site. Boral Bricks may be consulted for detailed descriptions of the 

process and of operating conditions during the test 

The No. 1 Brick Kiln exhausts to the atmosphere by way of a 40.75 inch diameter vertical 

stack extending through the roof of the building housing the kiln. Two sample ports at 90 ° 

are provided at a location 37.5 inches below the stack exit and 114 inches above the point 

where the fan duct enters the stack. 

3.0 TEST PROCEDURES: Test procedures used are those described in the Code of 

Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A.. Specifically, Method 1 was used to 

determine the number of sample points and Methods 5, 6 and 26A were used to measure 

velocity, moisture, and particulate, SO2 and fluoride emissions. The Method 6 option of using 

the particulate sample train for SO2 determination was used. Sample duration was 60 minutes 

for each of triplicate samples. 

Filters were recovered by rinsing the front half of the filter holder into the probe wash and 

securing the filters in glass petri dishes. Part of the sample filter normally adheres to the filter 

gasket, and some of the adhering material is recovered into the probe wash. Therefore some of 

the filter weight is attributed to the probe wash weight. Filters were heated in an oven for 2 

hours at 105" C, desiccated at least 24 hours and weighed to constant weight. Probe wash 

samples in acetone were evaporated to dryness over low heat in tared beakers, desiccated for at 

le•o•t 24-hours•and•veighed to co•ast•s•t weight. Weighings were made at 6 hour or greater 

intervals (samples stored in desiccator). Final weights were considered valid and were recorded 

if there was no more than 0.5 milligrams difference from the previous weighing. 

The back half samples in 3% hydrogen peroxide distilled water were recovered and an aliquot 

removed for sulfur dioxide analysis. Following gravimetric analysis for particulate, the filter 

and probe wash residue was added to the impinger catch. Those samples were shipped Oxford 

Laboratories for analysis by IC-HPLC as described in Method 13. 
Boral Bricks 

No. 1 Brick Kiln 

PM/F1 Emissions Test April 22, 1999 

Collected Test Data: 

Date 

Time start 

Time end 

As sq ft 

Dn in. 

Cp dimensionless 

4. Theta minutes 

5. y dimensionless 

n" Pbar in. Hg 

z 

pg in. H20 

s. 

Vm cf (dry gas) 

sqr(•P),avg in.H20^.5 

•o. 

AH in. H20 

tl. ts degrees F 

12. tm degrees F 

•3. Vlc ml 

14. CO2 percent 

is. 02 percent 

16. CO percent 

lz M,PM milligrams 

is. M,F milligrams 

SO2 Sample Weight Determination 

Collected data 

RUN NO. 

Vt-Vtb ml 

RUN1 

4/22/99 

1009 

1109 

9.0570 

0.336 

0.84 

60.00 

1.01 

29.74 

-0.22 

53.577 

0.5590 

2.8308 

397.71 

77.17 

103 

2.50 

18.00 

0.00 

46.1 

128.00 

RUN2 

4/22/99 

1119 

1120 

9.0570 

0.336 

0.84 

60.00 

1.01 

29.74 

-0.22 

RUN 3 

4/22/99 

1228 

1329 

9.0570 

0.336 

0.84 

60.00 

1.01 

50.491 

0.5528 0.5501 

2.5125 

404.21 

79.71 

92 

2.50 

18.00 

0.00 

51.8 

110.00 

29.74 

-0.22 

50.337 

2.4625 

408.29 

82.83 

98 

2.50 

18.00 

0.00 

44.1 

99.50 

1 

18 

2 

13.1 

3 

9.9 

10 

N meq./ml 0.0100. 0.0100 0.0100 

Vsoln ml 500 500 500 

Va ml 

Calculation 

RUN NO. 1 2 3 

M,SO2 

10 10 

N(Vt-Vtb)(Vsoln/Va)(32.03 mg/meq) 288.27 209.80 158.55 

403.40 
Boral Bricks 

No. 1 Brick Kiln 

PM/F1 Emissions Test April 22, 1999 

Calculations: 

•- Pm in.Hg 

2. Ps in. Hg 

3. An sq ft 

(DH/13.6)+Pbar 

(Pg/13.6)+Pbar 

((Dn/24)^2)(3.1416) 

4. Vmstd dscf 

Vm Y(Pm/Pstd)(Tstd/Tm) 

s. Vwstd scf 

(.04707cffml)(Vlc) 

a Bws dimensionless 

Vwstd/(Vwstd+Vmstd) 

RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 AVG. 

z Md mol.wt, dry basis 

.44 co2+.32 O2+.28(CO+N2) 

s.' Ms mol.wt, wet basis 

Md(l-Bws)+18 Bws 

9. Vs ft/sec 

Kp Cp (sqrDP)sqr(Ts/(Ps Ms)) 

,o. Q cfm 

n. Qstw scfm 

Vs As(60 see/rain) 

Q(Ps/Pstd)(Tstd/Ts) 

•z Qstd dscfm 

Qstw(1-Bws) 

z3. I percent 

[(100 Ts)(.002669 Vle+(Vm Pro/Tin)I/(60 theta Vs Ps An) 

Particulate Emissions 

1. E,PM pounds/hr 

(M,PM/Vmstd)(Qstd)(60)/(453590) 

z C,PM grains/dscf 

(M,PM/Vmstd)(.0154 grains/mg) 

29.9481 

29.7238 

6.16E-04 

53.239 

4.848 

0.0835 

29.12 

28.19 

40.61 

22070 

13497 

12370 

105.5I 

1.42 

29.9247 29.9211 

29.7238 29.7238 

6.16E-04 

49.897 

4.330 

O.O799 

29.12 

28.23 

40.29 

21892 

13287 

12226 

6.16E-04 

49.453 

4.613 

0.0853 

29.12 

28.17 

40.23 

21860 

13206 

12079 

100.37 

50.863 

0.0829 

40.37 

21940 

13330 

12225 

100.05 101.98 

1.68 1.42 1.51 

0.0133 0.0160 0.0137 0.0144 

S02 Emissions 

•- E,SO2 poundshtr 

0Vl,SO2/Vmstd)(Qstd)(60)/(453590) 

C,SO ppm 

(M,SO2/Vmstd)(13.27) 

Fluoride Emissions 

1. E,F pounds/hr 

(M,Fl/Vmstd)(Qstd)(60)/(453590) 

2. C,F ppm 

8,86 

71.9 

6.80 5.12 

55.8 42.5 

6.93 

56.7 

3.93 3.57 3.21 3.57 

(M,Ft/Vmstd)(44.68) 107.4 98.5 89.9 98.6 
6.0 CALIBRATIONS: 

Measurement devices used by Environmental Monitoring Laboratories and subject to changes in measurement 

precision are initially calibrated prior to use. Those instruments for which calibration factors are subject to change or 

for which calibration checks are required, are calibrated following each field use or as otherwise directed and noted. 

Calibration procedures for specific equipment are as follows. 

Dry Gas Meter: 

Dry gas meters are periodically removed from the sampling consoles and cleaned and repaired (new gaskets etc. as 

required). Following the overhaul of a meter, the measuring precision is checked by the Bell Prover Method and 

adjusted when necessary to read to within 2% of 100% accuracy. This service is provided by Big Three Meter 

Company in Jackson, Mississippi. Overhaul service or any six month period is followed by a five point calibration 

described in APTD-0576 using either a wet test meter or calibrated dry gas meter (used exclusively for calibrations) as 

a standard reference. Following field use, a gas meter calibration is checked in one of two ways. [1] Three calibration 

checks at intermediate orifice settings are performed or [2] orifice meter coefficients are used. 

If a meter coefficient obtained from pre-test and post-test checks differs by more than 5%, the coefficient (Y) giving the 

lower sample volume is used in the calculations. 

Orifice: 

The orifice coefficient is initially determined and is rechecked following a major gas meter repair and calibration. 

Nozzles: 

Nozzles are checked before each field use with a precision (.001 in.) dial caliper. Three measurements on different axes 

are made; an average of those three readings is used in calculations. If the tolerance among measurements exceeds 

0.004 inches (highest to lowest reading) the nozzle is repaired and recalibrated or discarded. 

Pitot Tubes: 

Pitot tubes meeting EPA geometry standards are assigned a coefficient of 0.84. Pitot tubes are visually inspected for 

damage before, during and after use. Those pitot tubes not meeting the geometry standards are assigned a coefficient 

from the manufacturer's calibration which it retains unless damaged. All pitot tubes used by Environmental Monitoring 

Laboratories are manufactured by NuTech, Inc. 

Temperature Measuring Instruments: 

All temperature measurements are made with type K thermocouples and digital thermocouple thermometers, which 

have an-it•at-catibrafxmtraceabtea•o-NBS. Thermocouples are checked during a test series against an A•'I'M mercury 

in glass thermometer at ambient temperature. Continuity and proper thermocouple contact location are checked by 

challenging the thermocouple with a temperature change. (EMTIC GD-028 June 21, 1994) 

Barometer: 

Aneroid field barometers are checked against and adjusted to readings from a mercury barometer or readings obtained 

from local weather authorities. 

Differential Pressure Gauges: 

Velocity head (delta P) and orifice pressure differential (delta H) measurements are made using water manometers of 

the appropriate range unless otherwise noted in the test data. Manometers do not require calibration. 
7.0 APPENDICES 

Field and. •yfical Daa 

B. Calibrations 

C. Huoride •ysis Report (Oxford) 
SOURCE: 

TEST FOR: 

ORS" 

Date: 

SKETCH,OF STACK 

STACK DIAMETER: 

Distance from ports to disturbance: 

A, to upstream disturbance 

B, to downstream disturbance 

Upstream diameters: 

Downstream diameters: 

Minimum No. sample points required: 

No. sample points selected: 

Port Length: "•',•" 

Port, Type: 

Port Access: 

MINIMUM NO. OF POINTS ON A DIAMETER 

downstream diometers 

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 

_v_ejocit• 

l 20 .• 16_.L 12 

'' 

2 .0 4 .0 6 .0 8 .0 

upstream diameters 

PERCENT OF DIAMETER 

poinls on a diameter . 

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 

No. 

14.6 6.7 4.4 3,2 2,6 2,1 1.8 1.6 

2 85.4 25.0 14.6 10.5 8,2 6.7 5.7 4,9 

3 75.0 29.6 19,4 14.6 11.8 9.9 8.5 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7 14.6 12,5 

5 85.4 67,7 34,2 25.0 20.1 16.9 

6 95,6 80,6 65,8 35.6 26,9 22,0 

7 89.5 77.4 64.4 36,6 28.3 

8 96.8 85.4 75,0 63.4 37.5 

9 91.8 82.3 73.1 62.5 

10 97.4 88.2 79.9 71.7 

93,3 85,4 78.0 

•2 97.9 90.1 83.1 

13 94,3 87.5 

M 98,2 91,5 

15 95.1 

16 98.4 

ink:h:es velocity head- 
Source: 

"rest For: 

/Test Operators: 

•eter •o× 

mple Box 

Probe/Pitot 

Pitot Cp 

Nozzle Dia. 

Filter No. 

Arab. Temp OF 

Bar. Press. "Hg 

Static Press. "Hg ....--. •.'• 

Port lJ'Elapsed lJ DGM 

Point II Time tl Reading 

tl M,o/soo II Ft." 

No. Sample Pts. [•Kq.- 

Minutes/Pt. •,•'• 

K FACTOR SETUP 

Meter Temp •O•" 

% H20 /• 

Stack Temp. q•O ( .q£:• 

•: Factor f.• q.o• 

GAS ANALYSIS: 

o2 I g 

CO 

Time 

CONDENSATE: 

init. •) final 

SILICA GEL: 

init. 3•- final 737 

Notes: 

"'0 .•a," 

Head AP 

in. H20 

Orifice 

AH 

in. H•O 

LJA 

Sample Train: •ak Checks: 

JJpit°t Tubes: High 

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC. RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI 601/856-3•g)2 

Stack 

Temp 

o F 

Oven 

Temp. 

o F 

.00• cfm @•"Hg Pretest: Sample Train 

Pitot Tubes 
bource: __._•. 

Test For: pitt 

Test Operators: -,, 

*•.ter Box 

.mple Box •i•1•.•. Probe/Pitot 

Pitot Cp 

Nozzle Dia. 

Filter No. 

!Amb. Temp.°F 

Bar. Press. "Hg ] ¢ 

Static Press. "Hg I. • 

RUN NO. ____• 

Date ,•• 

K FACTOR SETUP 

N°tes: 

AH@ 

Meter Temp 

% H20 

Stack Temp. 

K Factor 

le 

CONDENSATE: 

init. • 

SILICA GEL: 

init. •) 

• (7i; 

•se• DGM 

rne Reading 

Cse• Ft.3 

Velocity tl Orifice 

Head Ap AH 

in. H•O in. H•O 

• "It ic 

i :i1 

2-!'i•0 

 '1"1 

Sample Train: •0/--> •,/•7 • 

Checks: 

Pitot Tubes: High @ • H20 Low 

S tack 

Temp 

o F in 

it 

Meter Temp il Oven 

OF 

i[ out 

Pretest: Sample Train 

Pitot Tubes 

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC. RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI 6a11/856-31•)2 
Source: 

Test For:. 

Test Operators: 

,mple Box 

Probe/Pitot 

No. Sample Pts. • 

Minutes/Pt. Q,. •- 

K FACTOR SETUP 

AH@ 

GAS ANALYSIS: 

CO• 

CO 

Time Nozzle Dia. 

Filter No. 

Amb, Temp. OF" • • 

Bar, Press. "Hg _¢ q.7q 

Static Press. "Hg ,--.'q,,,-•.- 

CONDENSATE: 

init. •0 final 

SILICA GEL: 

init. •3"• final 

Port 

Tim Point 

linlm 

DGM Velocity Orifice 

Reading Head AP AH 

Ft, in. H20 in. H•O 

Leak Checks: Sample Train: 

Pitot Tubes: 

Stack 

Te•np 

o 

F 

Meter Temp 

o 

F 

in out 

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LABORATORIES, INC, RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI 6III/•56-3|•)2 

RUN NO. 

Date 

• 

Notes: 

Imp. 

Temp. Telnp 

OF 

Sample Train 

Pitot Tubes 
SAMPLES: 

DATE TAKEN: 

DELIVERED BY: 

ANALYZED BY: 

7._ ---• • DATE ANALYZED: 

/# RECEIVED BY: 

FILTERS: 

(Attach chain of custody if additional exchanges occur) 

[, RUN NO. 

'FILTER NO. 

FILTER TARE, gins. 

]FINAL WEIGHT, gms. 

NET GAIN, gms. 

I 

,.C3o• 

o2f7 

5-'7o• 

II 

PROBE WASH: 

RUN NO. 

CONTAINER I.D. 

VOLUME INTACT? 

VOLUME, ml 

TARE WEIGHT, gms. 

FINAL WEIGHT, gms 

NET GAIN, gins. 

LESS BLANK, gms. 

(//) 

/or.deo 

¢ 

PARTICULATE SAMPLE WEIGHT: 
SAMPLES: 

DATE TAKEN: 

DELIVERED BY: 

ANALYZED BY: 

DATE ANALYZED: t• 

RECEIVED BY: /"•, 

(Attach chain of custody if additional exchanges occur) 

Standardize BaC12 

titration H2SO4 H2SO 4 

normality Volume, ml 

BaC12 

Volume, ml 

BaCI2 

normality * 

*N BaCl, ((ml H2SO4)(N H2SO4))/(ml BaClx) 

B aCI2 Normality = 9 • O '• 

i•ll•J•lll•F, tf•'•Iit•t•'•l•!•l•ll•l•g•/•.•l.•/il•:[|• •"•J•'• ";l• "•",' •" 

Sample Ti•ations: 

Sample 

ID 

Sample Aliquot 

Volume, ml Volume, ml 

BaC12 

Volume, ml 

I• .o 

/_?.• 

•.! 

Remarks 
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION 

Meter ID 

Calibration Method 

Calibration Meter ID 

Date 

NuTech (2298915) 

DGM/DGM 

651729 

4/26/99 

By WBM 

Pbar 29.50 

Va•. 

2 

2 

2 

DH Time 

in. min 

H•O 

1.90 15.00 

1.90 15.00 

1.90 15.00 

Callbratin• Meter 

Vi Vf !Temp Vi Vf 

ft 3 ft 3 F ft 3 ft 3 

234.770 246.036 66 468.888 480.126 

246.036 257.125 72 480.126 491.120 

257.125 268.058 74 491.120 501.945 

FleidMeter 

Temp. in Temp out 

init. final 

74 76 74 75 

76 78 75 76 

78 79 76 77 

Y 

1.014 

1.0121 

1.012 

Q 

0.76 

0.74 

0.73 

K 

0.699 

0.681 

0.669 

DH@ 

1.886 

1.987 

2.056 

kvexages: 1.01 1.98 

Y [Vcal)(Pbar)(Tdgm)]/[(Vagm)(Pm)(Tcal)] 

K Q(sqrt((Pm Mm)/((Tm out)(DH)) 

Q ((Vmi-Vmf)/min.)(TM,out/Tm,avg)(y) 

DH@ 0.921/K^2 

Where: 

Y Meter correction factor, dimensionless 

Vcal= Volume of gas through calibrating meter, cubic feet 

Vdgm Volume of gas through field dry gas meter, cubic feet 

Pbar Barometric pressure, in. Hg 

Pm= Meter pressure, (Pbar DH/13.6) 

Tdgm Average dry gas meter temp, degrees R 

Tcal Temperature of gas at calibrating meter, degrees R 
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION 

Meter ID 

Calibration Method 

Calibration Meter ID 

Date 

NuTech (2298915) 

DGM/DGM 

651729 

12/30/98 

By WBM 

Pbar 29.91 

Vac. DH Tlmt Calibrating Meter 

in. in. min Vi Vf Temp Vi Vf 

Hg H,o ft 3 ft 3 72 ft 3 ft 3 

2 5.00 9.75 447.975 459.910 50 572.358 583.781 

2 4.00 11.50: 459.910 473,002 52 583.781 596.452 

2 3.00 15.50 473.002 487.651 50 596.452 610.790 

2 2.00 19.00 487.651 502.164 48 610.790 625.074 

2 1.00 19.75 502.164 513.060 52 625.074 635.830 

Field Meter 

Temp. in 

iniL final 

44 45 44 

45 48 44 

48 50 45 

50 47 47 

54 52 50 

Tem• out Y Q K 

/ 

init. | final 

44 1.020 1.2 0.7051 1.851 

45 1.010 l.ll 0.732 1.720 

47 1.009 0.93 0•706 1.847 

47 1.011 0.76 0.703 1.862 

50 1,010 0.55 0.716 1.798 

Averages: 1.01 1.82 

¥ [Vcal)(Pbar)(Tdgm)]/[(Vdgm)(Pm)(Tcal)] 

K Q(sqrt((Pm Mm)/((Tm ou0(DH)) 

Q ((Vmi-Vmf)/min.)(TM, out•m,avg)(Y) 

DH@ 0.921/K^2 

Wherel 

Y Meter correction factor, dimensionless 

Veal Volume of gas through calibrating meter, cubic feet 

Vdgm Volume of gas through field dry gas meter, cubic feet 

Pbar Barometric pressure, in. Fig 

Pm Meter pressure, (Pbar DH/13.6) 

Tdgm Average dry gas meter temp, degrees R 

Tcal= Temperature of gas at calibrating meter, degrees R 
( XFORD 

L•=n boratorles 

C. 

Analytical and Consulting Chemists 

DATE RECEIVED 05-07-99 1316 Sout• Fifth Street 

DATE REPORTED 05-24-99 Wilmington, N.C. 28401 

9 9w2 6 5 7 (910) 783-9793 

Fax (9!0) 343-9688 

PAGE t OF t 

ENVIRONMHNTAL MONITORING 

242 INGLESIDE DRIVE 

MADISON, MS 39110 

ATTENTION: DANNY RUSSELL 

P.O. # DGRS06 

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: BORAL BRICK (3 F BY HPLC) 

I. BORAL BRICK R1 

2. BORAL BRICK R2 

3. BORAL BRICK R3 

4. METHOD 

RESULTS 

Fluoride, as. F, Total ug 

.uoride, as F, Total ug 

1 2 3 4 

128000 109000 99500 

128000 II0000 99200 

NOTE: * SAMPLES ANALYZED BY .IC-HPLC. 

R C. OXFORD• CHEMIST 
PAGE_J___ OF __• 

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LAB ORATORIES 

POST OFFICE BOX 655 

RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI 39158 

PHONE: 601/856-3092 

FAX: 601/853-2151 Attention: Danny Russell 

Laboratory: 

Oxford Laboratories, Inc. 

1316 South Fifth Street 

Willmington, NC 28401 910/763-9793 

Please return copy of chain of custody with analytical report 

Attention: EML PO No. DGR506 

Project: Boral Bricks (4-22-99) Rush | Routine • Fax Results 

:AN•YSES• -REQUES•I/ 

Fluoride by HPLC (Method 13) 

Boral Brick R1 aqueou.s 

Boral Brick R2 aqueous 

Boral Brick R3 aqueous 

X 

X 

X 

Total gg 

Total gg 

Total gg 

Relinquished by: (print name; initial) Dam/time Received by: (print name; initial) Date/time 

Daniel G. Russell 5/6/99 

Relinquished by: (print name; initial) Received by: (print name: initial) Date/time 

Relinquished by: (print name; initial) Date/time Received by: (print name; initial) Date/time 

COURIER 

Fed-Ex 

Date Shipped 

5/6199 

Date/time