alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Rhett S. Williams, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VIANET.WORKS, Inc. (“VIA”);

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for VIA and have:

 

a)                                      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to VIA, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluatedthe effectiveness of VIA’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c)                                      disclosed in thisreport any change in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred duringVIA’s most recent fiscal quarter  thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, VIA’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

5.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to VIA’s auditors andthe audit committee of VIA’s board of directors:

 

a)                                      allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect VIA’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)                                     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 13, 2004      |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ RHETT S. WILLIAMS   |   |
| Rhett S. Williams       |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Banco Bradesco S.A.Exhibit 6.1Earnings per share

   

   December 31,2012

   

   2011

   

   2010Weighted average number of preferred shares outstanding (in shares)

   

   1,907,702,283

   

   1,906,821,919

   

   1,881,367,20810% right for preferred shares

   

   190,770,228

   

   190,682,192

   

   188,136,721Adjusted weighted average number of preferred shares outstanding (in shares) for EPS calculation

   

   2,098,472,511

   

   2,097,504,111

   

   2,069,503,929Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in shares)

   

   1,909,848,315

   

   1,908,948,826

   

   1,880,830,018Total weighted average number of shares outstanding (in shares) (A)

   

   4,008,320,826

   

   4,006,452,937

   

   3,950,333,947Net income (in thousands of reais) (B)

   

   R$ 11,291,570

   

   R$ 10,958,054

   

   R$ 9,939,575EPS for common shares (B)/(A) = (C)

   

   R$ 2.83

   

   R$ 2.74

   

   R$ 2.52EPS for preferred shares (C) +10%

   

   R$ 3.12

   

   R$ 3.01

   

   R$ 2.77
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Neah Power Systems, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Stephen M.
Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:      February
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      STEPHEN M. WILSONStephen
      M. WilsonChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) of UTEK
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Clifford M. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Clifford M. Gross  
|Name: Clifford M. Gross
|Date: May 9, 2006      



Page 34 of 35
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 67958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-8465]



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 226 / Friday, November 24, 2006 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 67958]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 94

[Docket No. 02-046-3]
RIN 0579-AB79


Importation of Swine and Swine Products from the European Union; 
Correction

Correction

    In rule document E6-8465 beginning on page 31069 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 1, 2006, make the following corrections:


Sec.  94.9  [Corrected]

    1. On page 31069, in the third column, in Sec.  94.9(a), in the 
last line, footnote indicator ``\1\ '' should read ``\10\''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in the same section, at 
the bottom of the page, in the footnote, footnote indicator ``\1\'' 
should read ``\10\''.

[FR Doc. Z6-8465 Filed 11-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


Of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Puda Coal, Inc.
(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  March 31,
      2010
              
              /s/Liping
      ZhuLiping
      ZhuChief
      Executive OfficerDated:  March 31,
      2010
              
              /s/Qiong
      (Laby) WuQiong
      (Laby) WuChief
      Financial Officer
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-392775

NO. 2017-BA-0796

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Petitioner successfully passed the Louisiana Bar Examination. However, the Committee on Bar Admissions ("Committee") advised petitioner that it was unable to certify him for admission to the bar on character and fitness grounds.

Petitioner then applied to this court for admission to the practice of law. We remanded the matter to the Committee on Bar Admissions Panel on Character and Fitness to conduct an investigation and appointed a commissioner to take character and fitness evidence. Following the proceedings, the commissioner filed his report with this court, recommending that petitioner's application for admission be denied. Neither party objected to this recommendation.

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude that at this time, petitioner has failed to meet his burden of proving that he has "good moral character" to be admitted to the Louisiana State Bar Association. See Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 5(D). Accordingly, it is ordered that the application for admission be and hereby is denied. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 9(D)(13), petitioner *409may not re-apply for admission until one year has passed from the date of this judgment.

**ADMISSION DENIED.**

JOHNSON, C.J., would conditionally admit.

HUGHES, J., would conditionally admit.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: September 1980      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
Janiel M. PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1936

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00411

- CV

T.B.

, Appellant

V

.

B.B.

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 16th District Court

of Denton County ( 22

- 4175

- 16 )

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s

judgment is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. W e affirm the

divorce grant but reverse the cruelty finding. We also reverse the trial court’s division

of the marital estate, including all community property and debts, and we reverse all

provisions regarding the Marton Precision Manufacturing, LLC stock. We modify the

money jud gment awarded to Mother from $504,754.64 to $455,230.19. We affirm theremainder of the Final Decree and remand the case for a limited new trial solely on

the issues of (1) the ground(s) for divorce and (2) a just and right division of the

marital estate.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear their own costs of this appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 As ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the  Company ) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report ), we, Angelo De Caro and Robert F. OConnell, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Angelo De CaroAngelo De CaroChief Executive Officer/s/ Robert F. OConnellRobert F. OConnellChief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Total  Luxury  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sandy
J. Masselli, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ SANDY J. MASSELLI, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.

August15, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Clifford M. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Clifford M. Gross         
|Name: Clifford M. Gross, Ph.D.
|Date: November 7, 2008
No. 84-2022.

#### 324 Liquor Corp., dba Yorkshire Wine *&*Spirits *v.*McLaughlin et al.

Ct. App. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 475 U. S. 1080.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
In re: Commitment of: Johnny KOCIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Mike CARROLL, Secretary, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1448

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020100EN.01000101.xml

| 27.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9788 — JAB/Jacobs Douwe Egberts)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 100/01)

On 20 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9788. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9788. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - (-)idaho(1)
              - maine(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Center News        October 3, 2022        How can a ground motion sensor improve a weather forecast?
CARL B. NELSON

REGUL A T O R Y CONSU L TING



## ( 202) 281-4356

carlnelsonconsulting@gmail.com



### 1363 Mass. Ave SE

Washington, DC 20003

February 11, 2015

Application of Seaborne Airlines for a Statement

of Authorization to Codeshare with Air Europa,

DOT-OST-2015-0024

We have polled the carrier representatives named on

the service list to the captioned application, and there

are no objections. Seaborne accordingly requests

expedited approval.

Respectfully submitted.

Carl B. Nelson

On behalf of Seaborne Airlines

cc: Darren Jaffe

Service listCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the

foregoing document by email on the following:

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com (Air Europa)

ekatz@ggh-airlaw.com (Air Europa)

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

abigail.donovan@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

dan.weiss@united.com

gmurphy@crowell.com (United)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Spirit)

matwood@cozen.com (Frontier)

jhill@cooley.com (JetBlue)

perkmann@cooley.com (JetBlue)

bob.kneisley@wno.com

thomas.ting @suncountry.com

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

_________________________ Carl B. Nelson

Regulatory Consulting

February 11, 2015
1994 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-22-1994

Bailey v. Snyder

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 93-9002

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1994 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Bailey v. Snyder" (1994). 1994 Decisions. Paper 120.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994/120
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 _______________ 

 NO. 93-9002 

 _______________ 

 BILLIE BAILEY, 

 Appellant

v. 

 ROBERT SNYDER, Warden, 

 Delaware Correctional Center 

 _______________ 

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, 

 GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, 

 ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges. 

 O R D E R

 A majority of the active judges having voted for 

rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is 

 O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court list the 

above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court. 

 By the Court, 

 \s\ Dolores K. Sloviter 

 Chief Judge 

Dated: August 22, 1994
# C_2020369EN.01000201.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/2

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 19 March 2019 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40411 Google Search (AdSense)

Rapporteur: Croatia

(2020/C 369/02)

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Google’s gross revenues generated in the EEA by Google’s online search advertising intermediation activity should be taken into account for the purpose of the calculation of the basic amount of the fine.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fine set in this case.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that an additional amount (‘entry fee’) should be applied in this case.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no aggravating and no mitigating circumstances applicable in this case.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a deterrence multiplier should be applied in this case.

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine.

8.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
ESTATE OF Frank R. WEBB, Sr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Brenda Y. WEBB, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0411

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 02, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Neah Power Systems, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, David M. Barnes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


By:
              
              /s/
                  David M. BarnesDavid
                    M. BarnesChief
                    Financial OfficerMarch
                    19, 2007
Shawn DARLING, Appellant, v. Shaquille O'NEAL, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.