alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020075EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9713 — EQT/Recover)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 75/01)

On 28 February 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9713. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9713. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           90,014
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 103,241
<PP&E>                                           118,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (45,369)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   299,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            96,928
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         28,239
<OTHER-SE>                                       174,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     299,494
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 85,644
<CGS>                                            62,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    236,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (211,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (211,583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.007)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Timothy R. Horne, Senior Vice President-Finance, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March  9, 2004          |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| /s/ Timothy R. Horne           |   |   |
| Timothy R. Horne               |   |
| Senior Vice President-Finance, |   |
| Treasurer and                  |   |
| Chief Financial Officer        |   |
|                                |        |  |

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), orincorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth byspecific reference in such a filing.

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Reconnaissance of uranium and copper deposits in parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming      

      June 1, 1952    

View Document

Because of the common association of uranium and copper in several of the commercial uranium deposits in the Colorado Plateau Province, a reconnaissance was made of several known deposits of copper disseminated through sandstone to determine whether they might be a source of uranium. In order to obtain more information regarding the relationship between copper, uranium and carbonaceous materials, some of the uraniferious asphaltrite deposits in the Shinarump conglomerate along the west flank of the San Rafael Swell were also investigated briefly.

During this reconnaissance 18 deposits were examined in New Mexico, eight in Utah, two in Idaho, and one each in Wyoming and Colorado.

No uranium deposits of commercial grade are associated with the copper deposits that were examined. The uraniferous asphaltites in the Shinarump conglomerate of Triassic age on the west flank of the San Rafael Swell, however, are promising from the standpoint of commercial uranium production.

Spectrographic analyses of crude oil, asphalt, and bituminous shales show a rather consistent suite of trace metals including vanadium, nickel, copper, cobalt, chromium, lead zinc, and molybdenum. The similarity of the metal assemblage, including uranium of the San Rafael Swell asphaltites, to the metal assemblage in crude oil and other bituminous materials suggests that these metals were concentrated in the asphaltites from petroleum. However, the hypothesis that uranium minerals were already present before the hydrocarbons were introduced and that some sort of replacement or uranium minerals by carbon compounds was effected after the petroleum migrated into the uranium deposit should not be disregarded.

The widespread association of uranium with asphaltic material suggests that it also may have been concentrated by some agency connected with the formation of petroleum. The problem of the association of uranium and other trace metals with hydrocarbons should be studied further both in the field and in the laboratory.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado;Idaho;New Mexico;Utah;Wyoming
                  - Colorado
                  - Idaho
                  - new mexico
                  - Utah
                  - Wyoming

View All **
Page 2 of 2 Comment on Refined Acute Dietary Risk Assessment

“ The Agency’s protocol within the refined dietary risk assessment assigns residue values to those samples were no residue was detected within the calculation to identify exposure. What were the impacts to the overall exposure potential from samples calculated under this protocol? Is the Agency identifying that all samples of table grapes contained a

residue? ” California Grape & Tree Fruit Lea gue Comment

The Agency has previously released a document outlining this policy (“Assigning Values to

Non

- Detected/Non

- Quantified Pe sticide Residues in Human Health Food Exposure Assessments”, OPP 03/23/2000). With regards to the dietary assessments conducted using grape monitoring data, HED HED Response

did not assume that all samples of table grapes contained methomyl residues. Since grapes are considered a partially blended commodity, it is appropriate to use PDP monitoring data measurements directly and to incorporate zero residues to reflect the percent of the crop which is not treated. For the case of methomyl on grapes, 2181 total samples were used in the dietary assessment with 131 actual detects from PDP. The remaining 2051 samples were assumed to have zero methomyl residue.

Comment on the Methomyl Tolerance Expression

The tolerances established for methomyl are for parent methomyl only. Parent methomyl has been determined to be the only residue of toxicological concern and is the only entity included in the tolerance expression. DuPont Crop Protection Comment

HED concurs that compliance with the tolerance levels for methomyl is determined by measuring just parent methomyl only, and HED will remove mention of the oxime during the registration review process. However, please note that the residue definition needs to be modified to ensure that it appropriately covers th e metabolites and degradates of methomyl and that it specifies the residues to be measured for each commodity within the tolerance expression (Interim Guidance on Tolerance Expressions, S. Knizner, 05/27/09). HED Response

The revised tolerance definition is as foll ows: Tolerances are established under 40 CFR §180.253 for residues of the insecticide methomy l, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on a variety of food and feed

crops . Compliance with the tolerance levels specified is to be determined by meas uring only m ethomyl [ S

- methyl N

- [(methylcarbamoyl )oxy] thioacetimidate]

.
# C_2021415EN.01005801.xml

| 13.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/58

---

P9_TA(2020)0297

EU/China Agreement: cooperation on and protection of geographical indications ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 November 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the agreement between the European Union and the government of the People's Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications (08359/2020 — C9-0298/2020 — 2020/0089(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 415/10)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08359/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08359/2020),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the government of the People's Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications (08361/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the government of the People's Republic of China on cooperation on, and protection of, geographical indications (08361/2020),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0298/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0298/2020),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 11 November 2020 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 11 November 2020 (1) on the draft decision,

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0199/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0199/2020),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the People's Republic of China. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0298.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Water's Way at Sleepers River watershed – revisiting flow generation in a post-glacial landscape, Vermont USA      

      July 1, 2015    

The Sleepers River Research Watershed (SRRW) in Vermont, USA, has been the site of active hydrologic research since 1959 and was the setting where Dunne and Black demonstrated the importance and controls of saturation-excess overland flow (SOF) on streamflow generation. Here, we review the early studies from the SRRW and show how they guided our conceptual approach to hydrologic research at the SRRW during the most recent 25 years. In so doing, we chronicle a shift in the field from early studies that relied exclusively on hydrometric measurements to today's studies that include chemical and isotopic approaches to further elucidate streamflow generation mechanisms. Highlights of this evolution in hydrologic understanding include the following: (i) confirmation of the importance of SOF to streamflow generation, and at larger scales than first imagined; (ii) stored catchment water dominates stream response, except under unusual conditions such as deep frozen ground; (iii) hydrometric, chemical and isotopic approaches to hydrograph separation yield consistent and complementary results; (iv) nitrate and sulfate isotopic compositions specific to atmospheric inputs constrain new water contributions to streamflow; and (v) convergent areas, or ‘hillslope hollows’, contribute disproportionately to event hydrographs. We conclude by summarizing some remaining challenges that lead us to a vision for the future of research at the SRRW to address fundamental questions in the catchment sciences.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - Watershed Hydrology
                  - Surface Water
                  - Water
                  - Sleepers River watershed
                  -  New England
                  - United States
                  - Vermont

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic
Laura PETERSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of David Peterson v. BIG COVE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC.

1160059

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
David J. BREZNAU, DOC #S33086, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 (the Report) of Innovaro, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: April 11, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                       493
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,153
<PP&E>                                          10,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        191
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,112)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,603
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,977
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,823)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,823)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00837-CV

IN RE Lucille CRAPPS and Hunter Schuehle, Independent Co-Executors of the Estate of Van 

L. Crapps, Deceased

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 27, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 12, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The real party in 

interest filed a response to which relators replied. After considering the petition, the real party in 

interest’s response, relators’ reply, and the mandamus record, this court concludes relators are not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 9498, styled In the Matter of the Estate of Van L. Crapps, Deceased, pending 

in the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas, the Honorable Mark Cashion presiding.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Tony W. Belcher, General Manager [Chief Executive Officer] of Elwood Energy LLC (the "Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge that:

1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit for the year ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).
2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2002 and for the period then ended.



|/s/ Tony W. Belcher                                                        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Tony W. Belcher
General Manager
[Chief Executive Officer]
December 18, 2002
|
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff

Reference Materials        October 1, 2018        Report of the IAU Working Group
Mestelle TELSAINT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.