alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

Performance Insurance Company SPC Chapter 15

Case No.: 21-12609-AJC

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding.

_________________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the Order on Motion of Foreign Representatives 

to Compel Turnover of Funds Held at KeyBank National Association (D.E. 34) was sent (a) via 

electronic filing using the CM/ECF system with the Clerk of the Court which sent e-mail 

notification of such filing to all CM/ECF participants in this case as listed on the Service List and 

(b) on this date to the other persons who are not CM/ECF participants as indicated on the Service 

List below.

Dated: July 16, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1250 

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 372-8282 

Facsimile: (305) 372-8202

Email: ggrossman@sequorlaw.com

jmendoza@sequorlaw.com

By: /s/ Juan J. Mendoza

Gregory S. Grossman

Florida Bar No. 896667

Juan J. Mendoza

Florida Bar No.: 113587

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 35 Filed 07/16/21 Page 1 of 3
2

SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

SERVICE LIST

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service 

for this case.

 Paul J. Battista pbattista@gjb-law.com, gjbecf@gjb-law.com; chopkins@gjblaw.com; jzamora@gjb-law.com; gjbecf@ecf.courtdrive.com; vlambdin@gjb-law.com

 Steven J Brotman Steven.brotman@lockelord.com, Irene.rabba@lockelord.com

 Robert F. Elgidely RElgidely@foxrothschild.com, bserrano@foxrothschild.com;

rsolomon@foxrothschild.com

 Gregory S Grossman ggrossman@sequorlaw.com, ngonzalez@sequorlaw.com

 Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

 John T. Rogerson III john.rogerson@arlaw.com, dana.tompkins@arlaw.com;

richene.oliver@arlaw.com; philip.navarro@arlaw.com

Manual Notice List

The following is the list of parties who will receive via US Mail:

Leib M Lerner

333 S Hope St, 16th FL

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Aaron C. Smith

Locke Lord LLP

111 South Wacker Dr., Suite 4100

Chicago, IL 60606

Geoffrey C Williams

90 Park Avenue, 15th Floor

New York, NY 10016-1387

KeyBank

Attn: Officer, Managing or General Agent

Key Tower, 127 Public Square

Cleveland OH 44114

KeyBank

Attn: Officer, Managing or General Agent

P.O. Box 93885

Cleveland, OH 44101-5885

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 35 Filed 07/16/21 Page 2 of 3
3

SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

KeyBank

Attn: Jennifer Wedge

Vice President/Senior Relationship Officer

One Canal Plaza

Portland, Maine 04101

KeyBank

3507 Kyoto Gardens Drive

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

Attn: Branch Manager

Via US Mail & Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested

KeyBank, 

Attn: Office of the General Counsel

Key Tower, 127 Public Square

Cleveland, OH 44114

The following is the list of parties who will receive via E-Mail:

 KeyBank, Attn: Neil Buitenhuys, at Neil_C_Buitenhuys@KeyBank.com

 KeyBank, Attn: Lisa Bertalan, at lisa_bertalan@keybank.com

 KeyBank, Attn: Jessica Morgans, at Jessica_Morgans@keybank.com

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 35 Filed 07/16/21 Page 3 of 3
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5440 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain regulated 

companies to elect out of the public utility property energy investment 

tax credit limitation in the case of solar energy property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2016 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain regulated companies to elect out of the public utility 

property energy investment tax credit limitation in the 

case of solar energy property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTION OUT OF PUBLIC UTILITY PROPERTY 

4 LIMITATION WITH RESPECT TO SOLAR EN5 ERGY PROPERTY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 50(d) of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: ‘‘At the election of a taxpayer with respect to 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5440 IH

1 public utility property, paragraph (2) shall not apply to 

2 energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3)) which 

3 uses solar energy and is placed in service by the taxpayer 

4 after December 31, 2015. Such election shall be made on 

5 a property-by-property basis on a timely filed return for 

6 the taxable year in which such property is placed in serv7 ice, and once made, may be revoked only with the consent 

8 of the Secretary. No such election may be made by the 

9 taxpayer if such election is required by a State or political 

10 subdivision thereof, by any agency or instrumentality of 

11 the United States, or by a public service or public utility 

12 commission or other similar body of any State or political 

13 subdivision thereof.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

16 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
William LAMBRIX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7103** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BERNARD KING, a/k/a Shaborn , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , District Judge. ( 2:94

- cr - 00163

- RBS

- 14 )

Submitted : October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opini on . Bernard King, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bernard King seeks to appeal the distri ct court’s order and judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion as successive and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)( 1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distr ict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We hav e independently reviewed the record and conclude that King has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 Additionally, we construe King’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an applicati on to file a second or successive
§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evid ence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C. A. § 22 55(h ) (West Supp. 2011)
. King’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to fi le a s uccessive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

[KPMG LOGO]

                             KPMG LLP
                             Suite 600
                             701 West Eighth Avenue
                             Anchorage, AK 99501

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Northrim BanCorp Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-120836) on Form S-8 of Northrim BanCorp Inc.'s Employee Stock Incentive Plan
and Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Award Plan of our reports dated
February 18, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Northrim
BanCorp Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2004, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which report appears
in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Northrim BanCorp Inc.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Anchorage, Alaska
March 11, 2005

          KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
            member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28596]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4814-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

New York; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York (FEMA-4814-DR), dated August 29, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on October 22, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Catharine O. 
Fan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Lai Sun Yee as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-28596 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
# C_2020110EN.01000201.xml

| 2.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9742 – Sinopec Group/Joint Stock Company Novatek/Gazprombank/SINOVA Natural Gas Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 110/02)

On 30 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9742. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9742. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
PALM BEACH BRAIN & SPINE and Amos O. Dare, M.D., Appellants, v. Louseline NOEL and Brittany Monger, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2516

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Demarcus Devonte KIMBLE

NO. 2018-KH-0925

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that petitioner sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify *497bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Charles T. REID, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 2, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020023EN.01000201.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9670 — APMC Group/GSEZ Cargo Ports/GSEZ Mineral Port/TIPSP/Arise)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 23/02)

On 17 January 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9670. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9670. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, Melissa K. Rice, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Dynamic Response Group, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                       
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Melissa K. Rice                                                   
|                        |  | Melissa K. Rice, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(Formerly Pultronex Corporation),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February
28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Joseph Batty,  Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 22, 2005


/s/ Joseph Batty
Joseph Batty
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 97041-97042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4828-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 11 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated September 28, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the

[[Page 97042]]

State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
September 28, 2024.

    Collier County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance and emergency protective measures [Category 
B], limited to direct federal assistance and reimbursement for mass 
care including evacuation and shelter support under the Public 
Assistance program).
    Marion and Sumter Counties for Public Assistance (already 
designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], limited 
to direct federal assistance under the Public Assistance program).
    Lee County for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and debris removal and 
emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct 
federal assistance under the Public Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-28655 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
Thomas PORTER, Appellant, v. ALSCO LINEN SERVICES/ALTERNATIVE SERVICE CONCEPTS, Appellees.

No. 1D17-1761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Alvin CATCHINGS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1801

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, it is repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated three applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.