T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e R e be c c aR . P a l l m e y e r , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** * the N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof I l l i noi s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T FR EDDI E L OU I S B ENNETT ,

P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v . B . C U R R Y , W a r de n,

R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e lle e . N o. 08- 16690 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 7 - CV - 0 2 2 6 1 - SI ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S us a n I l l s t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 15, 2010 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: R Y M E R and F IS H E R , C i rc ui tJudg es , and P A L L M E Y E R , D i stri ct Judg e. *** 

# FI LED JU L 07 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

F re dd i e L ou i s B ennett , appeari ng pro se, appeal s the di sm i ss al of hi s habea s pe t i t i on f orf a i l ur e t o s t a t e ac l a i m on w hi c h r e l i e f c a n be gr a nt e d. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 a n d 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 a n d w e a f f i rm. B ennettcont ends thathe had a l i berty i nt er es tprot ec t ed by the D u e P r o c e s s C lau s e in c e rta in p r is o n d is c ip lin a ry p r o c e e d in g s h e s a y s w e r e u n f a ir . In part i cul ar , he ar gu es thatthe di sc i pl i naryproceedi ng s and as soci at ed penal t i es tr ig g e r e d alib e rtyin te r e s t b e c au s e th e y “w ill in e v itab lya f f e c t th e d u r a tio n o f

h is se nt ence . ” Sa nd i n v. C on ner , 515 U . S . 472, 487 ( 1995) . H i s a l l e ga t i ons do not s u p p o rt th a t c la im . E v e n a s s u m in g d is c ip lin a ry p r o c e e d in g s m ig h t in e v itab ly a f f e c tth e d u r a t i o n o f

c o n f i n e me n tf

o raCa l i f

o rn i ai n d e t e rmi n a t e p r i s o n e ri n s o me c ir c u m s ta n c e s , B e n n e tt’s p e titio n a n d d o c u m e n ts c ru c ia l to it th a t h e s u b m itte d to the di stri ctcourtdem on stra t e thatthe B oard of P ar ol e H eari ng s has deem ed B e nne ttuns ui t abl e f

orpa r ol e f

ors e ve r a l i nde pe nde nt l y a de qua t e r e a s ons a nd not o n ly b e c au s e o f

th e d is c ip lin a ry r e c o r d h e s e e k s to c h a lle n g e . B e c au s e h is d is c ip lin a ry r e c o r d d id n o t “a lte rth e b a la n c e ” in h is p ar o le s u itab ility de t e rm i na t i on, i t s e f

f e c ti f a ny on the dur a t i on of

hi s s e nt e nc e “ i s s i m pl y t oo att enuat ed t o i nv ok e the procedural gu ar ant ee s of the D ue P roce ss C l ause . ” Sa n d in , 515 U . S . a t487.3

B ennettal so cont ends thathe had a l i berty i nt er es ti n the di sc i pl i nary proceedi ng s bec ause they r es ul t ed i n g oo d t i m e and po st conv i ct i on cr edi tpenal t i es thathe says w i l l af

fe ctthe du ra t i on of hi s s ent ence . H i s a l l egat i on s do n otsupp ort th is c la im b e c au s e h e is a n in d e te rm in a te - te rm p r is o n e rw h o h a s e x c e e d e d h is m i ni m um s e nt e nc e a nd s e rve d ove r30 y e a r s , a nd i ti s the r e f or e unl i ke l y – a nd cert ai n l y n o ti n ev i t ab l e –th atan y actu al rel ease d at e w o u l d b e affected b y th ese penal t i es i f he i s e ver deemed sui t abl e f or parol e. A F F I R M E D .