alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Antonio NEELEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0802

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

Antonio Neeley, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Gethers v. State*, 838 So.2d 504, 508 (Fla. 2003) ; *Cadet v. State*, 239 So.3d 113, 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
Caesar DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. WAL-MARK CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4433

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A99A0836.

#### WRIGHT v. BARNES.

(524 SE2d 758)

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Melanie Wright appeals from the denial of her motion for new trial after a jury awarded her zero damages on her claims for medical expenses and pain and suffering following an automobile accident. *685Among her enumerations of error is the claim that the trial court erred in entering an order denying her motion for new trial without holding a hearing on that motion. The record shows that Wright filed a timely motion for new trial on August 28, 1994. There is a rule nisi setting the motion down for hearing on October 22, 1998. On October 13, 1998, before holding the hearing, the trial court denied the motion for new trial.

Decided November 4, 1999.

*Dozier, Lee, Graham & Sikes, Lester Z. Dozier, Jr., James V. Pleasants,*for appellant.

*Whelchel, Brown, Readdick & Bumgartner, Brenda K. Fleocer,*for appellee.

Our case law holds that a movant on a motion for new trial is entitled to a hearing on that motion. *Gantt v. Sweatman,*162 Ga. App. 738 (293 SE2d 359) (1982), citing *Foster v. State,*230 Ga. 870 (199 SE2d 790) (1973) and *Shockley v. State,*230 Ga. 869 (199 SE2d 791) (1973). Because there is nothing in the record showing that Wright waived or abandoned her right to a hearing, she was entitled to have the motion heard before the trial court ruled on it. See *Peyton v. Peyton,*236 Ga. 119 (223 SE2d 96) (1976). Therefore, we are remanding this case to the trial court for a hearing on Wright’s motion for new trial.

In light of our holding above, we do not address the remaining enumerations of error.

*Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.*
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: In re Baytown Nissan Inc., Burklein Family Limited Partnership,

Frederick W. Burklein and J. Cary Gray

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 0070 4

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 38072

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: November 7, 2014

Party filing motion: Real Parties i n Interest

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

Date: November 25, 2014
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - (-)north dakota(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 9, 2008        3 to 4.3 Billion Barrels of Oil in North Dakota and Montana
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Canyonlands National Park

Filters

              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)

## By Location

              - arizona(7)
              - colorado(8)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new mexico(4)
              - (-)new york(2)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(44)
              - washington(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Photography        April 18, 2018        Rainout shelters allow researchers to study the effects of drought

Photography        April 17, 2018        Rainout structures allow researchers to study the effects of drought
## S I 0-100910-01 5 

## TH E FLORID ASENAT E Tallahassee , Florid a 32399-110 0

SENATO R DO N GAET Z

4t h Distric t COMMrTTEES : Healtt i Regulation , Chai r Socia l Responsibilit y- Policyan d Steering
. C'uii ' EdLicatlonPre-K-1 2 Energy , Environment , an d Lan d Us e - PolTc yan d Steerin g Healt h an d Huma n Service s Appropriation s Rule s Way s an d Mean s - Policyan d Steerin g SELEC T COMMITTEE : Florida' s Economy , CAsil r Augus t 30 , 201 0 Honorabl e Raymon dLaHoo d Secretai y o f

Transportatio n U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Docke t

OST-2010-012 4 Dear Secretary LaHood : C D

r o >

—G O It i s agrea t privileg e fo r

m e t o writ e i n stron g support o f th e Northwes t

Florid aRegiona l Airport (VPS ) applicatio n t o receiv e th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra mGrant
. Thi s grant wil l significantl y assis t

i n providin g fund s fo r

recruitin g additiona l ai r

carrie r service s an ddiversifyin g publi c transportatio n option s throug halow-cos t carrier
. Thi s award^winnin g airport , locate djus t outsid e o f

Fort Walto n Beach , Florida , jvovide s acriticall y importan t componen t

t o th e econom y o f

Northwes t

Florida
. A s aregio n i n whic h touris mi s asignifican t part o f ou r area' s economi c developmen t an dgrowth
. Northwes t

Florid aRegiona l Airport play s ake y rol e i n providin g ai r

trave l t o thousand s o f

visitor s an dth e opportunity for potential visitor s t o trave l t o Northwes t Florid aeac hyear . Unfortunately , du e t o th e recen t impac t o f th e Deepwate r

Horizo n Oi l Spill , ou r

are aha s see n a declin e withi n th e touris mindustry
. I n orde r t o regenerat e thi s downtume deconomy . Northwes t Florid a Ri^iona l Airport

wil l hav e th e chanc e t o creat e an ddevelo p ne w market s o f service , especiall y i n area s i n whic halow-cos t

carrie r i s unavailabl e alon g th e Gul f Coast
. With thes e newl y develope dprograms , it wil l contribut e greatl y t o th e qualit y o f lif e fo r ove r 2 millio n peopl e i n th e airport' s potential catchmen t area , but hel p significantl y i n providin g viabl e ai r transpcntatio n an deconomi c growth withi n ou r region
. I woul dgreatl y appreciat e you r consideratio n fo r

full fundin g o f

th e Northwes t

Florid aRegi(Hia

l Airpor t projec t s o tha t it will enric hou r

econom y an dcontinu e t o offer beneficia l servic e connection s for Northwes t

Florida
. Respectfully ,

Senato r Do n Gaet z
REPL Y TO : • 430 0 Legendar

yOtive
. Suit e 230 , Destln
. Florid a 3254 1 (850 ) 807-574 7 a 32 0 Senat e Offic e Building , 40 4 Sout h Monro e Street
. Tallahassee , Florid a 32309-110 0 (850 ) 487-500 9 Senate' s Website : www.tlaenatB.gov JEF F ATWATE R Presiden t o f ttie Senat e MIK E FASAN O Presiden t Pr o Tempor e
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     The undersigned Director of Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
appoints each of R. Marc Langland and Joseph M. Schierhorn his/her true and
lawful attorney and agent, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, to do
any and all acts and things and execute any and all instruments which the
attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable to cause the Company's 2005
Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and likewise to sign any and all amendments (the signing of any such
instrument to be conclusive evidence that the attorney considers such instrument
necessary or desirable), hereby granting to each such attorney power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or
his/her substitute may do by virtue hereby.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
this Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons in the capacity
indicated on this 13th day of March, 2006.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>
/s/ Larry S. Cash                                    /s/ Christopher N. Knudson
------------------------------------                 ---------------------------
Larry S. Cash                                        Christopher N. Knudson
Director                                             Director

/s/ Mark G. Copeland                                 /s/ R. Marc Langland
------------------------------------                 ---------------------------
Mark G. Copeland                                     R. Marc Langland
Director                                             Director

/s/ Frank A. Danner                                  /s/ Richard L. Lowell
------------------------------------                 ---------------------------
Frank A. Danner                                      Richard L. Lowell
Director                                             Director

/s/ Ronald A. Davis                                  /s/ Irene Sparks Rowan
------------------------------------                 ---------------------------
Ronald A. Davis                                      Irene Sparks Rowan
Director                                             Director

/s/ Anthony Drabek                                   /s/ John C. Swalling
------------------------------------                 ---------------------------
Anthony Drabek                                       John C. Swalling
Director                                             Director
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 121


Small Business Size Standards; Engineering Services, 
Architectural Services, and Surveying and Mapping Services

Correction

    Proposed rule document 98-8996 was inadvertently published in the 
Rules and Regulations section of the issue of Tuesday, April 7, 1998, 
beginning on page 16882. It should have appeared in the the Proposed 
Rules section.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(105)
              - district of columbia(33)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(240)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(4)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(16)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(69)
              - north carolina(12)
              - (-)ohio(2)
              - pennsylvania(120)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(214)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(60)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

publication        February 23, 2021        Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: A history of change

State News Release        January 13, 2016        Visualize Your Water: A Citizen Science Challenge for High School Students
mstf10_1.htm


    Exhibit 10.1

    
 

    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO MONARCH STAFFING, INC.

    (FORMERLY
      MT ULTIMATE HEALHCARE CORP.)

    2005
      STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

    


    This
      Amendment No.1 to the Monarch Staffing, Inc. (formerly MT Ultimate Healthcare
      Corp.) 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is adopted by the Board of Directors of Monarch
      Staffing, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") as of June 29,
      2007.

    


    RECITALS

    


    WHEREAS,
      the Company maintains the
      Monarch Staffing, Inc. (formerly MT Ultimate Healthcare Corp.) 2005 Stock
      Incentive Plan (hereinafter the “Plan”); and

    


    WHEREAS,
      pursuant to Section 11.1 of
      the Plan, the Plan may be amended from time to time.

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
      Plan be amended as follows, effective as of June 29, 2007:

    


    1.           The
      introductory paragraph of Section 3.4 of the Plan shall be amended and restated
      in its entirety as follows:

    


                “3.4  Subject
      to the provisions of Section 3.9, the maximum aggregate number of shares of
      Common Stock which may be issued pursuant to Awards under the Plan 

                shall
      be Two Million
      Five Hundred Thousand (2,500,000) shares. Such shares of Common Stock shall
      be
      made available from authorized and unissued shares of the 

                Company.”

    


    2.           This
      Amendment No.1 shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the
      Plan.

    


    3.           Except
      as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and
      effect.

    


    


    *   *  *  *  *  *

    


    I
      hereby certify that the foregoing
      Amendment No.1 to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Monarch
      Staffing, Inc. on June 29, 2007.

    


    


    By
           _________________    

    Name:  Keith
      Moore

    Title:    Secretary
Thomas SMITH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4704

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Keith JOHNSON

NO. 2018-KK-0840

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the quarterly report of Universal Communication Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Curtis Orgill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: February 17, 2005                 By:  /s/ Curtis Orgill
                                             -----------------
                                        Curtis Orgil
                                        Chief Financial Officer






                                       14
# C_2020098EN.01000401.xml

| 25.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9655 — HG/GA/Argus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 98/04)

On 6 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9655. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9655. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) of Innovaro, Inc. (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Asa Lanum, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|              |  |                  
|------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Asa Lanum
|Name:         |  | Asa Lanum        
|Date:         |  | November 12, 2010
Benny GREEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Ontrell WASHINGTON

No. 2018-KD-0742

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS**

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I would grant the State's writ application to vacate the trial court's ruling and reinstate the defendant's conviction and sentence.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

CLARK, J., would grant and docket.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      9
<CIK>                                          0001098337
<NAME>                                         First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         4330
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         5122
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    16867
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         86403
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        479193
<ALLOWANCE>                                    6420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 603939
<DEPOSITS>                                     425849
<SHORT-TERM>                                   118832
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            7524
<LONG-TERM>                                    11000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4664
<OTHER-SE>                                     36069
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 603939
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                10251
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1603
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               137
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               11991
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5007
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6914
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5077
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  130
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2493
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1647
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1647
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.52
<LOANS-NON>                                    969
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               6309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  19
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              6420
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        6420


</TABLE>
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE #20, (Adrian RODRIGUEZ), Appellee.

No. 3D17-2784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**WrittenStatement of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the PrincipalFinancial Officer of VIA NET.WORKS, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/ RAY WALSH               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Ray Walsh                   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|   | November 10,  2005     |
|   |                        |
|   | /s/ HAN VAN  LEEUWEN        |   |
|   | Han van Leeuwen             |
|   | Principal Financial Officer |
|   | November 10, 2005      |
|        |                             |        |  |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileJustin R. Nichols, Ph.D.