alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   Date:    August 31, 2010
    /s/ José Sérgio Gabrielli de AzevedoJosé Sérgio Gabrielli de AzevedoChief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   Date:     August 31, 2010
    /s/ Almir Guilherme BarbassaAlmir Guilherme BarbassaChief Financial Officer and Chief Investor Relations Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 94856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28159]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 5, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: November 26, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-28159 Filed 11-26-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth WHITMORE

NO. 2017-KP-1341

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of OneBeacon U.S. Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Paul H. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:March 19, 2010

 
|     | /s/  PAUL H. MCDONOUGH    |
|----------|---------------------------|
|     | Paul  H. McDonough        |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 34.3

LOGO

KPMG LLP

1601 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-24299

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members

Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined managements assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2009, Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31,
2009. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine
whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other
transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

LOGO

February 8, 2010

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.

member firm of KPMG
International, a Swiss cooperative.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Export Trade Certificate of Review

Correction

    In notice document 97-1574, appearing on page 3497, in the issue of 
Thursday, January 23, 1997, make the following correction:
     In the second column, the date above the signature line should 
read January 16, 1997.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

DEGOLYERAND MACNAUGHTON

4925 GREENVILLE AVENUE, SUITE 400 

ONE ENEROY SQUARE

DALLAS, TEXAS75206 

 

April 28, 2005 

 

Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. 

Av. República do Chile, 65/1702 

Rio de Janeiro 

Brasil 20035-900 

 

Gentlemen: 

 

We hereby consent to the references to our firm as set forth in the AnnualReport on Form 20-F of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) for the year ended December 31, 2004, under the heading “Item 4 - INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY - Exploration, Development and Production - WORLDWIDE ESTIMATED NET PROVEDRESERVES.” We prepared estimates, as of December 31, 2004, of the proved crude oil, condensate, and natural gas reserves and the oil equivalent of 68 fields with interests owned by Petrobras. These estimates were prepared in accordance with thereserves definitions of Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(13) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The fields are located in Brazil and offshore from Brazil, The volumes of proved reserves estimated, as of December 31, 2004are 8,462 million barrels of oil and condensate; 6,652,921 million cubic feet of marketable gas and 9,570 million barrels of oil equivalent. These estimates and the fields evaluated are those contained in our report entitled “Letter Report asof December 31, 2004 on Reserves of Certain Properties in Brazil with interests owned by Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.”
Christopher P. MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4565

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 10, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Bernando ROMAN III, Esquire, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Guy LEWIS, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2585

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5525 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5525

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service and 
      commercial mobile data service through the Lifeline program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2016

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Sessions) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service and 
      commercial mobile data service through the Lifeline program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Taxpayer Funded Cell Phones Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR MOBILE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Beginning on January 1, 2017, a provider of 
commercial mobile service or commercial mobile data service may not 
receive universal service support under sections 214(e) and 254 of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e); 254) for the provision of 
such service through the Lifeline program of the Federal Communications 
Commission.
    (b) Contributions.--For calendar year 2017, the amount that 
telecommunications carriers that provide interstate telecommunications 
services and other providers of interstate telecommunications are 
required to contribute under section 254(d) of the Communications Act 
of 1934 to Federal universal service support mechanisms shall be 
determined--
            (1) without regard to subsection (a); and
            (2) as if the same amount of support for the provision of 
        commercial mobile service and commercial mobile data service 
        through the Lifeline program that is provided in calendar year 
        2016 is provided in calendar year 2017.
    (c) Excess Collections.--The amount collected pursuant to 
subsection (b)(2) shall be deposited in the general fund of the 
Treasury of the United States, for the sole purpose of deficit 
reduction. No portion of such amount may be treated as a credit toward 
future contributions required under section 254(d) of the 
Communications Act of 1934.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Commercial mobile data service.--The term ``commercial 
        mobile data service'' has the meaning given such term in 
        section 6001 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation 
        Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1401).
            (2) Commercial mobile service.--The term ``commercial 
        mobile service'' has the meaning given such term in section 332 
        of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5505 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5505

   To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require 
  annual studies on ending the conservatorship of Fannie Mae, Freddie 
                      Mac, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2016

   Mr. Hill introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require 
  annual studies on ending the conservatorship of Fannie Mae, Freddie 
                      Mac, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GSE Review and Reform Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL STUDIES ON ENDING THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF FANNIE MAE, 
              FREDDIE MAC, AND REFORMING THE HOUSING FINANCE SYSTEM.

    Section 1074 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting after 
                ``Secretary of the Treasury shall'' the following: ``, 
                on an annual basis,''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``The study'' and 
                inserting ``Each study'';
            (2) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
    ``(b) Report and Recommendations.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall submit a report on each study required under subsection (a), 
along with recommendations developed in such study, to the President, 
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and 
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.''; 
and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Appearances Before Congress.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall appear before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the 
House of Representatives at annual hearings regarding each report 
required under subsection (b).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Surinder Rametra, Treasurer of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Goldeneye Capital
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 18, 2005

/s/ Surinder Rametra
--------------------
Surinder Rametra
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Termination Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.85 
 Termination Agreement 
 This Agreement is executed on January 16, 2006 by and between: 
 Party A: Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”) 
 Registered Address: Room 601, Unit C, No.18 of Xi Huan Road (S), Economic-Technological Development Area, Beijing 
 Party B: Wang Xiu Ling (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”) 
 Address: No.101, Unit 3, Building 7, Wu Sheng Bystreet (E), Chaoyang District, Beijing 
 Whereas: 
  

	1.	Party A and Party B executed a Share Pledge Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Share Pledge Agreement”) with respect to the equity interest held by Party B in
Beijing Lei Ting Wan Jun Network Technology Company Limited on November 30, 2004. 

  

	2.	Party A and Party B wish to terminate the said Share Pledge Agreement. 

 Now therefore, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Share Pledge Agreement, which shall automatically become invalid upon the effective date of this agreement. 

  

	2.	On the date when the Share Pledge Agreement becomes invalid, the rights and obligations of Party A and Party B under the Share Pledge Agreement shall be terminated accordingly.


  

	3.	This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution. 

  

	4.	This Agreement shall be governed by the PRC laws. 

  

	5.	This Agreement is made in two copies, each held by either Party. 

  

 1 









			
	[Execution Page]
	
	Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd.
	
	  

	Name:	 	Wang Lei Lei
	Title:	 	Legal Representative
	
	Wang Xiu Ling
		
	Signature:	 	

  

 2
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of JPC Capital Partners, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jimmie N. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Jimmie N. Carter-----------------------Jimmie N. CarterChief Financial OfficerAugust 29, 2008
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Shawn L. HUNT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-944

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Antonio Antwan WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 14, 2018

Joe Hamrick and Rick A. Sichta of The Sichta Firm, LLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Antonio Antwan Williams challenges his multiple convictions arguing the trial court erred in denying his pre-trial motion to exclude from trial any evidence regarding a dispute between Appellant and his wife. The State opposed the motion arguing the domestic dispute was inextricably linked to the charged offenses, and the trial court agreed. The issue is preserved for our review, *see* section 90.104(1), Florida Statutes (2017), but we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. *See**860*Truehill v. State* , 211 So.3d 930, 946 (Fla. 2017).

However, this cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of the judgment of conviction to reflect a conviction as to count three for burglary with an assault or battery while armed with a deadly weapon. The jury found that Appellant actually possessed a firearm and also committed an assault or battery on the victim during the course of the burglary. *See* § 810.02(2)(a)&(b), Fla. Stat. The judgment in the record erroneously lists this conviction as "armed robbery with assault or battery." Both armed robbery with a firearm and burglary with an assault or battery or while armed with a dangerous weapon are first degree felonies punishable by a sentence up to life imprisonment, which Appellant received for count three. *See* §§ 812.13(2)(a) & 810.02(2)(a)&(b), Fla. Stat. As correction of the judgment is a ministerial act, Appellant need not be present. *See**Jordan v. State,*143 So.3d 335, 339 (Fla. 2014) ; *Taylor v. State* , 185 So.3d 1281, 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

Appellant's convictions are AFFIRMED , but the cause is REMANDED with instructions.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.