alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Colorado

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - multimedia_image(25)
              - multimedia_image-141771(25)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(9)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(5)
              - hawaii(1)
              - utah(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(111)
              - 2023(109)
              - (-)2022(47)
              - 2021(16)
              - 2020(98)
              - 2019(16)

Photography  Colorado Plateau

Science Theme        January 10, 2022      Colorado River Basin Studies

social mediaColorado Water Science Center (News)

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      Water Studies in the Colorado River Basin in Utah

Photography  Solar Power

Photography  Solar Panels

Photography  USGS Snowmastodon Research

Photography  Drill Rig

Photography  Drill Rig

Photography  Drill Rig

Photography  Gas Drilling Rig

Photography  Drill Rig

Photography  Drill Rig and American Flag

staff profilePatricia A Solberg

partnerColorado Department of Transportation

location  Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin

partnerU.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Basin Region 7

Photography  Looking Downstream from Paria Riffle

Photography  Grand Canyon

Photography  Climax Molybdenum Mine

staff profileAmber K Holmberg

Photography  Water Holes Canyon

Photography  Bridge Over Troubled Waters

Photography  Reticulated python (Python reticulatus)

Photography  Wind Turbines

Photography  Installing Remote PIT Tag Readers

Photography  Sunset over Mt. San Jacinto and the Coachella Canal

Photography  Denver Display

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      Environmental Geoscience

Science Theme        January 24, 2022      Applied Geochemistry

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5435 

To prohibit the payment of bonuses to certain Department of Veterans Affairs 

employees pending filling of Department of Veterans Affairs medical 

center director positions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2016 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the payment of bonuses to certain Department 

of Veterans Affairs employees pending filling of Department of Veterans Affairs medical center director positions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Leadership 

5 and Improving Veterans Care Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5435 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PAYMENT OF BONUSES TO COV2 ERED EMPLOYEES PENDING FILLING OF DE3 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 

4 CENTER DIRECTOR POSITIONS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—No covered employee may be paid 

6 a bonus unless the Secretary of Veterans Affairs deter7 mines that no permanent position of Department of Vet8 erans Affairs medical center director has been vacant for 

9 18 consecutive months. 

10 (b) COVERED EMPLOYEES.—In this section, the term 

11 ‘‘covered employee’’ means any employee of the Depart12 ment of Veterans Affairs whose responsibilities include 

13 participation in the rating, ranking, or selection process 

14 for individuals to fill positions of Department medical cen15 ter directors and who occupies a senior executive position 

16 (as such term is defined in section 713(g)(3) of title 38, 

17 United States Code). 

18 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 

19 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 

20 days thereafter, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

21 submit to Congress a report outlining all vacancies in De22 partment of Veterans Affairs medical center director posi23 tions and the duration for which each such position has 

24 been vacant. 

25 (d) APPLICABILITY.—The prohibition under sub26 section (a) shall apply with respect to an 18-month period 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5435 IH

1 that begins on or after the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Myron ROSNER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(35)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - (-)nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        August 21, 2023        Modeling Songbird Density-Habitat Relationships to Predict Population Responses to Environmental Change Within Pinyon-juniper and Sagebrush Ecosystems

Project        June 21, 2009        NAWQA High Plains Regional Groundwater Study
Amendment No. 3 to Acuity Brands, Inc. 2001 Nonemployee Directors'  Stock Option



 EXHIBIT 10(iii) A (3) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO 
 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. 2001 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ 
 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT made as of the 26th day of June, 2007, by ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”): 
 W I T N E S S E T H 
 WHEREAS, the
Company has previously established the Acuity Brands, Inc. 2001 Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (“Plan”) to provide nonemployee directors an opportunity to purchase stock in the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan in the manner provided below; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. 
 Effective June 26, 2007, Section 2.6(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the words
“seventy percent (70%)” and replacing them with the words “sixty percent (60%)”. 
 2. 
 This Amendment No. 3 shall be effective as of June 26, 2007. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 3 to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the date first
above written. 
  

			
	        ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Vernon J. Nagel
		 	 Vernon J. Nagel,
 Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer
Timothy BARFIELD, DOC #331225, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - (-)arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
# C_2020291EN.01000201.xml

| 2.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9915 – Mitsubishi Corporation Energy/ENEOS/Taiyo Koyu)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 291/02)

On 26 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9915. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9915. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Luis JUAREZ ALVARADO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3039

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald N. Baird, President and CEO of Id-Confirm, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Id-Confirm, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 22, 2005

/s/ Ronald N. Baird				Ronald N. Baird
President and CEO (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 24****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     The undersigned Director of Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby appoints each of R.Marc Langland and Joseph M. Schierhorn his/her true and lawful attorney and agent, in the name andon behalf of the undersigned, to do any and all acts and things and execute any and all instrumentswhich the attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable to cause the Company’s 2006 AnnualReport on Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and likewise to signany and all amendments (the signing of any such instrument to be conclusive evidence that theattorney considers such instrument necessary or desirable), hereby granting to each such attorneypower of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or his/hersubstitute may do by virtue hereby.     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this Power ofAttorney has been signed by the following persons in the capacity indicated on this 12th day ofMarch, 2007.      /s/ Larry S. Cash /s/ R. Marc Langland   Larry S. Cash R. Marc LanglandDirector Director   /s/ Mark G. Copeland /s/ Richard L. Lowell   Mark G. Copeland Richard L. LowellDirector Director   /s/ Frank A. Danner /s/ Irene Sparks Rowan   Frank A. Danner Irene Sparks RowanDirector Director   /s/ Anthony Drabek /s/ John C. Swalling   Anthony Drabek John C. SwallingDirector Director   /s/ Christopher N. Knudson /s/ David G. Wight   Christopher N. Knudson David G. WightDirector Director
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Trizec Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy H. Callahan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ TIMOTHY H. CALLAHANTimothy H. CallahanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 10, 2005
Todd James HART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 14, 2018

O.H. Eaton, Jr., and Lori D. Loftis, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation. However, because the order of revocation does not accurately reflect the trial court's oral findings, we remand so that the order can be corrected.

An evidentiary hearing was held with regard to allegations that Appellant violated *1286his probation. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court found and orally announced that Appellant violated his probation by failing to report to his officer, failing to complete substance abuse treatment, drinking alcohol heavily, and committing home-invasion robbery as well as resisting police without violence. The court found the violations to be willful, material, and substantial.

The court's written order correctly stated that Appellant violated certain numbered conditions of his probation that corresponded with failing to report to his probation officer and failing to live without violating any law. The written order also noted that the revocation of Appellant's probation was, in part, for his failure to notify his probation officer of a change in residence or employment; however, the court made no such oral pronouncement. Additionally, the written order failed to include the trial court's oral findings that Appellant violated his probation by drinking heavily and not completing his substance abuse treatment. Where the oral pronouncement of revocation conflicts with the written order, the oral pronouncement controls. *Thompson v. State* , 965 So.2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (citing *Cockrell v. State* , 823 So.2d 322, 323 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting sentence, but reverse for entry of a corrected order of revocation that accurately reflects the oral findings of the trial court. *See**Desue v. State* , 605 So.2d 933, 935 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF CORRECTED ORDER.

WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Rodney LOUIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

Rodney Louis, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*780Affirmed. *See* *Rodriguez v. State*, 223 So.3d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ("The record, which includes the plea colloquy, clearly refutes these claims, and under Florida law, a defendant is bound by the statements he makes under oath during a plea colloquy.") (citing *Henry v. State*, 920 So.2d 1245, 1246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ); *see also* *Fultz v. State*, 218 So.3d 924, 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (affirming the trial court's order denying the defendant's Rule 3.850 postconviction motion because "all of [the defendant's] claims are refuted by the record.").
# C_2020309EN.01000101.xml

| 18.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9899 – KKR/Koos Holding Coöperatief)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 309/01)

On 20 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9899. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9899. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---