alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification Required Under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**
I, James W. McGinley, President and Chief Executive Officer of StratosLightwave, Inc., certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratosLightwave, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
     a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
-1-

 
     Dated: September 12, 2003 /s/ James W. McGinley            James W. McGinley    President and Chief Executive Officer
-2-
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - montana(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 16, 2020        Comet NEOWISE and the Roosevelt Arch at Yellowstone National Park

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - montana(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 16, 2020        Comet NEOWISE and the Roosevelt Arch at Yellowstone National Park

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic
SUCCESSION OF Nettie Lois DEAN

NO. 2018-00679

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.
Deontae THOMAS DOC #R12198, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-021

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  I, Marlen L. Roepke , certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of KNW Networks, Inc. ;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated: November 11, 2003
 by
 
 
 
 /s/ Marlen L. Roepke
 Marlen L. Roepke
 Officer/Director
Willie Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Julie JONES, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-633

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
R.G.R., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020098EN.01000501.xml

| 25.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9683 — Colony Capital/PSP/Etix)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 98/05)

On 16 January 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9683. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9683. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 23 Filed 03/04/21 Page 7 of 7
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130177 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130177 

 COA: 263101 

Wayne CC: 99-006862-01 

DOLPH CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 26, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Absolute Remodeling Concepts LLC Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 11,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 11,000.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. $ 338.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

December 1, 2021 /s/ Robert C. Furr

Date Robert C. Furr 210854

Signature of Attorney

FurrCohen P.A.

2255 Glades Rd.

Suite 419A

Boca Raton, FL 33431

561-395-0500 Fax: 561-338-7532

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-21397-SMG Doc 3 Filed 12/01/21 Page 1 of 1
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- MATRITECH, INC. -- EXHIBIT 4.1 TO FORM 8-K


    


    EXHIBIT
      4.1

    


    ELECTION
      REGARDING PAYMENTS DUE JULY 13, 2007

    ON
      SERIES A 15% SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

    DATED
      JANUARY 13, 2006

    


    


    The
      undersigned Holder hereby elects to have Matritech, Inc. defer to August 13,
      2007 all payments due to the Holder on July 13, 2007 with respect to the Series
      A 15% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes dated January 13, 2006.

    


    


    


    


    
      	 	
              Holder:
                ______________________

              


              


              By:__________________________

              Name:________________________

              Title:_________________________

              Date:_________________________
STATE EX REL. Richard LAY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0738

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Lay v. State, 14-2549 (La. 11/6/15), 181 So.3d 693.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Exhibit 35.3

LOGO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CAPITAL ONE MULTI-ASSET EXECUTION TRUST

Capital One Multi-asset
Execution Trust

c/o Capital One Bank (USA), National Association

140 East Shore Drive

Room 1071-B

Glen Allen, Virginia 23060

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One
Multi-asset Execution Trust for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One, National Association (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent
that:

1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Services Agreement dated as of March 16, 2006, by and
between Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and the Servicer (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the
Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 29thof March 2010.



|                                  |  |                        
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
|                                  | 
|By:                               |  | /s/ Colin Ruh          
|Name:                             |  | Colin Ruh              
|Title:                            |  | Chief Financial Officer



|           |  |         |  |            |  |              |  |                    |  |            |  |                |  |         |  |               
|---------- |  | ------- |  | ---------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------ |  | ---------- |  | -------------- |  | ------- |  | --------------
|Auto Loans |  | Banking |  | Commercial |  | Credit Cards |  | Healthcare Finance |  | Home Loans |  | Personal Loans |  | Savings |  | Small Business
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(60)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Phoenix, Arizona - B1 Scenario
Ryan E. BERRY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - (-)wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change

publication        January 1, 1994        Lake Number, a quantitative indicator of mixing used to estimate changes in dissolved oxygen
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as 

State v. Rosario, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4536.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in 

an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested 

to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 

65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or 

other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be 

made before the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2015-OHIO-4536

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROSARIO, APPELLEE. 

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Rosario, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4536.] 

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

(No. 2014-1174—Submitted September 1, 2015—Decided November 4, 2015.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 101558. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently 

accepted. 

 O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary 

H. McGrath, T. Allen Regas, and Frank R. Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting 

Attorneys, for appellant. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

 Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, 

Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. 

__________________
* The Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

** The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2426

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Aaron Jorge Diaz, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 11, 2004 Filed: May 17, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG, * Judge of the United States Court of International Trade.

___________ FAGG, Circuit Judge. Aaron Jorge Diaz pleaded guilty to receiving child por nography. At sentencing, the district court ** increased Diaz’s offense level by four under U.S.S.G.-2- § 2G2.2(b)(3) (increase required if child pornography “portrays sadistic or masochistic conduct or other depictions of violence”). On appeal, Diaz contends his images of child pornography were not sadistic, masochistic, or depictions of violence within the meaning of § 2G2.2(b)(3). We disagree. We have defined the term sadism as the infliction of pain on a love object to obtain sexual release, and as delight in physical or mental cruelty. United States v. Wolk , 337 F.3d 997, 1008 (8 th Cir. 2003); United States v. Parker , 267 F.3d 839, 847 (8 th Cir. 2001). We have defined violence as the exertion of physical force to injure or abuse. Id. The images in this case depict the sexual penetration of a minor girl by an adult male with his penis, a young boy performing fellatio on an adult male, an adult male performing anal sex on a minor girl, prepubescent girls performing fellatio on an adult male, a group of adolescent boys ejaculating on a grimacing prepubescent boy, and an adolescent male performing anal sex on a young boy. We conclude the images are sadistic or depictions of violence within the meaning of § 2G2.2(b)(3). See Parker , 267 F.3d at 847; United States v. Hall , 312 F.3d 1250, 1261-63 (11 thCir. 2002) (images showing vaginal or anal penetration of a prepubescent minor by either an adult male or a foreign object is sadistic within the meaning of § 2G2.2(b)(3)); United States v. Lyckman , 235 F.3d 234, 238-39 (5 thCir. 2000) (when pornographic image shows an adult male engaging in sexual intercourse with a young girl, the conduct shown is sufficiently painful, coercive, abusive, and degrading to qualify as sadistic or violent under § 2G2.2(b)(3)); United States v. Canada , 110 F.3d 260, 264 (5 thCir. 1997) (same). Diaz also argues the Government did not show he intended to receive the sadistic or masochistic images. Diaz did not raise this issue in the district court, and appellate review of the issue is foreclosed by Diaz’s plea agreement. Besides, we have already held that § 2G2.2(b)(3) has no express intent element and that we will not read one into it. Wolk , 337 F.3d at 1008.

We thus affirm Diaz’s sentence.

______________________________