Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 42727 

documents generally available 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the CAA and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, 

this action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 18, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides. 

Dated: June 19, 2015. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.720 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(205) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.720 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(205) On May 16, 2013, and August 

18, 2014, Illinois submitted variances to 

its regional haze state implementation 

plan affecting the following Midwest 

Generation, LLC facilities: Crawford 

Generating Station (Cook County), Joliet 

Generating Station (Will County), 

Powerton Generating Station (Tazewell 

County), Waukegan Generating Station 

(Lake County), and Will County 

Generating Station (Will County). 

(i) Incorporation by Reference. (A) 

Illinois Pollution Control Board Order 

PCB 12–121, adopted on August 23, 

2012; Certificate of Acceptance, dated 

August 24, 2012, filed with the Illinois 

Pollution Control Board Clerk’s Office 

August 27, 2012. 

(B) Illinois Pollution Control Board 

Order PCB 13–24, adopted on April 4, 

2013; Certificate of Acceptance, dated 

May 16, 2013, filed with the Illinois 

Pollution Control Board Clerk’s Office 

May 17, 2013. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17662 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0542; FRL–9930–44– 

Region–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Revisions to the New Source Review 

State Implementation Plan; Flexible 

Permit Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is fully approving 

revisions to the Texas New Source 

Review (NSR) State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) to establish the Texas Minor 

NSR Flexible Permits Program (FPP), 

submitted by the Texas Commission on 

Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The 

approval was predicated on the TCEQ 

meeting its commitment outlined in its 

letter dated December 9, 2013, to adopt 

certain minor clarifications to the 

Flexible Permit Program (FPP) by 

November 30, 2014. The TCEQ 

submitted the revised program rules to 

meet its commitment on July 31, 2014. 

The EPA is finalizing this action under 

section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This final rule will be effective 

August 19, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

42728 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

No. EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0542. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available. 

E.g., Confidential Business Information 

or other information the disclosure of 

which is restricted by the statute. 

Certain other material such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Permits Section (6PD–R), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 

Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 

75202–2733. While all documents in the 

docket are listed in the index, some 

information may be publicly available 

only at the hard copy location (e.g., 

copyrighted material), and some may 

not be publicly available at either 

location (e.g., CBI). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Stephanie Kordzi, telephone 214–665– 

7520; email address kordzi.stephanie@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. Response to Comments 

III. When is this action effective? 

IV. Final Action 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

On July 14, 2014, the EPA took final 

rulemaking action conditionally 

approving revisions to the Texas NSR 

SIP to establish the Texas Minor NSR 

Flexible Permits Program, submitted by 

the TCEQ. The EPA’s proposed 

conditional approval was published in 

79 FR 8368, February 12, 2014. The 

conditional approval was predicated on 

a commitment from TCEQ in a letter 

dated December 9, 2013, to adopt 

certain minor clarifications to the FPP 

by November 30, 2014. (79 FR 40666, 

July 14, 2014). 

On September 12, 2014, 

Environmental Integrity Project, et al., 

filed a Petition for Review challenging 

the EPA conditional approval of the FPP 

with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

The U.S. Department of Justice 

submitted the response to the Petition, 

Case No. 14–60649, for the EPA on 

March 2, 2015. The Appeal is on-going 

as of the date of publication of this 

notice. 

On July 31, 2014, the TCEQ submitted 

revisions to the Texas NSR SIP. The 

rulemaking properly structured the 

rules within and according to the 

rulemaking requirements of the Texas 

Administrative Procedure Act and the 

Texas Administrative Code. The EPA 

proposed full approval of the FPP (79 

FR 7875, December 31, 2014) based on 

its determination that the SIP revisions 

complied with section 110(k) of the 

Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA) 

and was consistent with the EPA’s 

regulations and policies. These 

revisions supported this action to 

convert the approved conditional FPP to 

a fully approved FPP. The EPA 

reopened the public notice period for an 

additional 30 days (80 FR 21199, April 

17, 2015), due to items being 

inadvertently omitted from the docket 

during the public notice period 

beginning December 31, 2014. 

II. Response to Comments 

The EPA proposed an initial comment 

period of 30 days. We received 

comments from 3 organizations during 

the initial comment period as follows: 

The TCEQ, Baker Botts, and the 

Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) on 

behalf of the Environmental Justice 

Advocacy Services, Community in 

Power & Development Association, 

Citizens for Environmental Justice, Air 

Alliance Houston, Texas Campaign for 

the Environment, and the Texas Impact. 

All comments previously submitted 

under the first public notice for this 

action are being responded to as 

appropriate and the commenters were 

informed that they did not need to 

resubmit them during the reopened 

public notice period. The EPA did not 

receive any additional comments during 

the reopened public notice period. All 

comment letters can be found in their 

entirety in the docket for this 

rulemaking. 

Comment 1: Baker Botts stated they 

supported EPA’s proposed approval of 

the Texas FPP. They believe it complies 

with the federal Clean Air Act. Further 

they believe that flexible permits are an 

essential part of the Texas air quality 

permitting program and the program has 

contributed to marked and sustained 

improvements in Texas air quality. They 

submitted information from TCEQ’s 

Web site which documents reductions 

in ozone and other pollutants in Texas. 

Response 1: The EPA appreciates the 

support for our final approval. No 

changes were made to the final rule as 

a result of this comment. 

Comment 2: The TCEQ concurs with 

the EPA’s proposed determination that 

the TCEQ fulfilled its December 9, 2013, 

commitment to submit the FPP SIP 

revision. The TCEQ also concurs with 

EPA’s proposed finding that the TCEQ 

has satisfied all the elements of the 

EPA’s final conditional approval (79 FR 

40666, July 14, 2014). The TCEQ 

submitted on July 31, 2014, the 

following rules: 30 TAC Sections 

116.13, 116.710, 116.711(1), (2)(A)(B) 

and (C)(i) and (ii), (D)–(J), and (L)–(N); 

116.715(a)–(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B); 

116.716; 116.717; 116.718; 116.721; and 

116.765. 

Response 2: The EPA appreciates the 

support for our final approval of the 

rule. No changes were made to the final 

rule as a result of this comment. 

Comment 3: The EIP stated the 

following: ‘‘this full approval action is 

non-substantive, it is not the agency 

action we seek to, or intend to, 

challenge.’’ EIP did resubmit their April 

4, 2014, comments on the proposed 

conditional approval (Attachment A), 

and their January 27, 2015, Fifth Circuit 

Court of Appeals brief (Attachment B). 

Response 3: The EIP did not submit 

comments on the substance of this 

action, which addressed the rules being 

properly structured within and 

according to the rulemaking 

requirements of the Texas 

Administrative Procedure Act and the 

Texas Administrative Code. The EPA 

addressed the April 4, 2014, comments 

that the EIP resubmitted in its response 

to comments contained in the final 

conditional approval. (79 FR 40666, July 

14, 2014). Further, the Brief of 

Respondent U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Case No. 14–60649, 

filed on March 2, 2015, replies to the 

issues raised by EIP in its January 27, 

2015, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals 

brief. EPA is incorporating by reference 

the EPA’s Reply Brief in this response 

to the EIP’s resubmitted comments. It 

can be found in the Docket to this 

action. 

III. When is this action effective? 

The EPA has determined that today’s 

final approval of the Texas FPP is 

subject to the requirement to delay a 

rule’s effective date until 30 days after 

publication in 5 U.S.C. 553(d) of the 

APA; therefore, the rule, will become 

effective 30 days after publication. 

IV. Final Action 

After careful consideration of 

submitted revisions to meet the 

requirements of the conditional 

approval and of the comments received 

and the responses to each comment 

provided above, and under section 110 

of the Act, the EPA is finalizing our 

proposal to convert the conditional 

approval of the FPP to a full, final 

action. Further, we have found it 

complies with section 110(l) of the Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 42729 

We are making the following revisions 

to the Texas SIP: 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.13—Flexible Permit Definitions. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.710—Applicability. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.711(1), (2)(A), (B) and (C)(i) and (ii), 

(D)–(J), and (L)–(N)—Flexible Permit 

Application. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.715(a)–(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B)— 

General and Special Conditions. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.716—Emission Caps and Individual 

Emission Limitations. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.717—Implementation Schedule for 

Additional Controls. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.718—Significant Emission Increase. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.720—Limitation of Physical and 

Operational Changes. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.721—Amendments and Alterations. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.740(a)—Public Notice. 

• Revisions to 30 TAC Section 

116.750—Flexible Permit Fee. Revisions 

to 30 TAC Section 116.765— 

Compliance Schedule. 

The EPA has determined that the 

revised rule satisfies the December 9, 

2013, Commitment Letter which was 

submitted in a timely manner. 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, we are finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with the requirements of 1 

CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

revisions to the Texas regulations as 

described in the Final Action section 

above. We have made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the EPA Region 6 office. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

See, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 18, 

2015. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposed of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 30, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart SS—Texas 

■ 2. In § 52.2270(c), the table titled 

‘‘EPA Approved Regulations in the 

Texas SIP’’ is amended by revising the 

entries for sections 116.13, 116.710, 

116,711, 116.715, 116.716, 116.717, 

116.718, 116.720, 116.721, 116.740, 

116.750, and 116.765 to read as follows: 

§ 52.2270 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

42730 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP 

State 

citation Title/Subject 

State 

approval/ 

Submittal date 

EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

Chapter 116 (Reg 6)—Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification 

Subchapter A—Definitions 

*******

Section 116.13 ..... Flexible Permit Definitions ........... 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

Subchapter G—Flexible Permits 

Section 116.710 ... Applicability .................................. 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

Section 116.711 ... Flexible Permit Application .......... 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP includes 30 TAC 116.711(1), 

(2)(A), (B) and (C)(i) and (ii), 

(D)–(J), and (L)–(N) 

* * * * * * * 

Section 116.715 ... General and Special Conditions .. 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP includes 30 TAC 116.715(a)– 

(e) and (f)(1) and (2)(B) 

Section 116.716 ... Emission Caps and Individual 

Emission Limitations.

7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

Section 116.717 ... Implementation Schedule for Additional Controls.7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

Section 116.718 ... Significant Emission Increase ...... 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

Section 116.720 ... Limitation on Physical and Operational Changes.7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

Section 116.721 ... Amendments and Alterations ....... 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

Section 116.740 ... Public Notice and Comment ........ 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP includes 30 TAC Section 

116.740(a). 

Section 116.750 ... Flexible Permit Fee ...................... 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

Section 116.765 ... Compliance Schedule .................. 7/31/2014 7/20/2015 [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP includes 30 TAC Section 

116.765(b) and (c). 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–17472 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0027; FRL–9930–79– 

Region–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; Low 

Reid Vapor Pressure Fuel Regulations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is taking a direct 

final action to approve revisions to the 

Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

related to Low Reid Vapor Pressure 

(RVP) Fuel Regulations that were 

submitted by the State of Texas on 

January 5, 2015. The EPA evaluated the 

SIP submittal from Texas and 

determined these revisions are 

consistent with the requirements of the 

Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). The EPA 

is approving this action under the 

federal CAA. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on September 18, 2015 without further 

notice, unless the EPA receives relevant 

adverse comment August 19, 2015. If 

the EPA receives such comment, the 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in 

the Federal Register informing the 

public that this rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06– 

OAR–2015–0027, by one of the 

following methods: 

(1) www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions. 

(2) Email: Ms. Tracie Donaldson at 

donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. 

(3) Mail or Delivery: Ms. Tracie 

Donaldson, Air Permits Section (6PD– 

R), Environmental Protection Agency, 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, 

Texas 75202–2733. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES