alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Edward L. BASKIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4137

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - (-)products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - (-)colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper

Data Access        February 1, 2024        USGS Science Collaboration Portal for the Colorado River Basin
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

## By Location

              - (-)colorado(1)
              - florida(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2020(1)

partnerNational Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
Ernest A. BURCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1496

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 9, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN RE: Michael J. BILLIOT

NO. 2018-B-1098

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into respondent's arrests for driving while intoxicated. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent violated Rules 8.4(a) (violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct) and 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Michael J. Billiot, Louisiana Bar Roll number 30223, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety and that respondent shall be placed on probation for a period to coincide with the term of his recovery agreement with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. Any failure of respondent to comply with the terms of the agreement may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

*400IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
P.A.E. GROUP LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2717

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
HAMILTON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ROMANA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida Profit Corporation, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3395

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Raymond Anthony Hanna EL, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2772

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Klaus Moeller, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant
to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

         (1) the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant
for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), to which this statement is
filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated:  July 13, 2004                   By:  /s/ Klaus Moeller
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Klaus Moeller
                                             Chief Executive Officer and Interim
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Katherine GILMER, Appellant, v. George GILMER, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3078

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ray Walsh, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of VIA NET.WORKS, Inc.(“VIA”);

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for VIA and have:

 

a)                                      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to VIA, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluatedthe effectiveness of VIA’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c)                                      disclosedin this report any change in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) thatoccurred during VIA’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, VIA’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to VIA’s auditors andthe audit committee of VIA’s board of directors:

 

a)                                      allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect VIA’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)                                     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in VIA’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: June 2, 2005 |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Ray Walsh           |   |
| Ray Walsh               |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Robert ACOSTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)
              PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, the undersigned officer of Lightspan, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 12, 2003
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      Michael A. Sicuro,
                                                      Senior Vice President,
                                                      Chief Financial Officer,
                                                      Treasurer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lightspan, Inc. and will be retained by Lightspan, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       31
Carl G. STAMM, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3336

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR

RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Universal Communication Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 22, 2006                      By:  /s/ Michael J. Zwebner

-----------------------

Michael J. Zwebner

Chief Executive Officer
INSTRUCTIONS:

EPA is seeking information regarding the costs of estimating PFC emissions under a possible approach that EPA is exploring

To estimate the costs of this methodology, please include the costs of estimating♦Gas/Facility- specific heel factors.

♦PFC-usage by process type, using engineering methods (e.g wafer pass or other indicator of tool activity)

♦PFC utilization and by-product formation factors by process type. Process types may include the example provided in the "Process Types" tab or a revised version. Assume facility is 

responsible for developing the utilization and by-product formation factors.

♦PFC DRE by abatement device.

Please note where you are already performing the measurements or estimates in the ordinary course of businessPlease provide detail where possible regarding how engineering estimates are calculated

Table 1. Annual Costs for Estimating Annual Facility-Level PFC Emissions

Facility-Specific Burden

Labor Burden For Collecting Data Instrumentation Burden For Monitoring Data

Comments (e.g., is measurem

Legal (hours) of business?)

Manager (hours)

Technical (hours)

Clerical (hours) Capital Costs ($)

Equipment Lifetime (years)

Annual O&M Costs 

($)

Other Annual Costs (please specify)

Gas-specific heel factors 500PFC usage by process tool 395PFC utilization and by-product formation factors by specific process type 640 $300K 7 $25KPFC DRE by abatement device 1896 $300k+$20k 7 $30K* Please clearly note any costs associated with activities that are part of business as usual operations at the fab.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10(f)





Amendment to Wachovia Corporation Savings Restoration Plan (“SRP”)


Section 2.1(jj) of the SRP is amended effective July 1, 2017 to read in full as follows: 


“Plan Administrator” of the Plan is the Director of Human Resources, the Director of Compensation and Benefits, and the Head of Enterprise HR Consulting of the Company, each of whom, acting individually, may take action as the Plan Administrator.
Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Platina Energy Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
August 19,
2008                                                                                     /s/ Blair J.
Merriam


Blair J.
Merriam,


Chief Executive
Officer
Curtis N. YOUNG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRS T 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 19

- 00249

- CR

Trial Court Cause

Number: 19

- 339023

Style: Anthony Mottin

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : November 23, 2020

Type of motion: Rehearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be file d:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant ad dition al motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

_____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s / Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justice Hightower

Date: April 20, 2021
Michael COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-729

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jessica L. SANCHEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Heriberto SANCHEZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0825

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB Case No.: 21-13230-EPK

 Chapter 7

Debtor.

/

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB Adv. No.: 21-01155-MAM

Plaintiff,

v.

MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION LOAN 

AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION OF THE UNITED STATES AND

THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA.

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR DEFAULT 

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA (DE #42)

THIS MATTER came before the Court on December 14, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. upon the

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on December 21, 2022.

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 50 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Default Final Judgment as to Defendant, University of Minnesota (DE 

#42; the “Motion”). The Court, having no one appear in opposition, and being otherwise fully advised 

in the premises, finds that good cause exists to grant the Motion. 

It is therefore ORDERED:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff, Christi Lee Straub, may submit its Default Final Judgment against 

University of Minnesota for failure to timely answer the Complaint and Summons.

###

Submitted by:

Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 64500

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

500 NE 4th St., Suite 200

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 765-3166

Facsimile: (954) 756-7103

Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

Chad Van Horn, Esq. is hereby directed to provide a conformed copy of this Order to all parties-ininterest and to file a Certificate of Service as to same.

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 50 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.2

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FNB Bancorp:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-9156, 333-98293 and 333-106363) on Form S-8 of FNB Bancorp of our report
dated March 3, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows of FNB Bancorp and
Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the
December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K/A of FNB Bancorp.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Sacramento, California
November 16, 2007
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00397

- CR

Samuel Gene Hill Jr.
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 424th District Court of Burnet County , Texas Trial Cause No. 44782

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, conc ludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by

this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 16, 2017
Benson CALLIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2529

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.
Thaddeus C. MARTIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Julie L. JONES, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0852

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5410 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to better align 

the grace period required for non-payment of premiums before discontinuing coverage under qualified health plans with such grace periods 

provided for under State law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2016 

Mr. FLORES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to better align the grace period required for non-payment 

of premiums before discontinuing coverage under qualified health plans with such grace periods provided for 

under State law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Coverage State 

5 Flexibility Act of 2016’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5410 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALIGNING QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN GRACE PE2 RIOD REQUIREMENTS WITH STATE LAW 

3 GRACE PERIOD REQUIREMENTS. 

4 Section 1412(c)(2) of the Patient Protection and Af5 fordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18082(c)(2)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (B)(iv)(II), by striking ‘‘a 

7 3-month grace period’’ and inserting ‘‘a grace period 

8 specified in subparagraph (C)’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(C) GRACE PERIOD SPECIFIED.—For pur12 poses of subparagraph (B)(iv)(II), the grace pe13 riod specified in this subparagraph is— 

14 ‘‘(i) for plan years beginning before 

15 January 1, 2017, a 3-month grace period; 

16 and 

17 ‘‘(ii) for plan years beginning during 

18 2017 or a subsequent year, such grace pe19 riod for non-payment of premiums before 

20 discontinuing coverage as is applicable 

21 under the State law of the State in which 

22 the Exchange operates to health insurance 

23 coverage offered in the individual market 

24 (or, in the case such a State law is not in 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5410 IH

1 place for the State involved, a 30-day 

2 grace period).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mihir K. Taneja    
|Mihir K. Taneja        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 14, 2008