alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005188EN.01003501.xml

| 20.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 188/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 188/35

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 July 2005

on the adjustment of the allowances paid to members and alternates of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2005/554/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 258 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 166 thereof,

Having regard to the request from the European Economic and Social Committee of 4 April 2005,

Whereas:

The amounts of the daily allowances paid to members and alternates of the European Economic and Social Committee, laid down by Council Decision 81/121/EEC (1), should be adapted,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Article 2 of Decision 81/121/EEC shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 2

1.   The daily allowance per travel day shall be:

| — | EUR 130 for members and alternates. |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 130 for members and alternates.

2.   The daily allowance per meeting day shall be:

| — | EUR 208 for members and alternates. |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 208 for members and alternates.

3.   Where the beneficiary furnishes satisfactory proof that he has incurred expenditure on an overnight stay at the place of work, he shall be paid a supplementary daily allowance of EUR 30.’

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 12 July 2005.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

G. BROWN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 67, 12.3.1981, p. 29. Decision as last amended by Decision 2002/985/EC, Euratom (OJ L 343, 18.12.2002, p. 31).

1

---
Ronald Harry ROBBINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1837

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021362EN.01018101.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/181 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/181

---

P9_TA(2020)0159

Setting up a subcommittee on tax matters

European Parliament decision of 18 June 2020 on setting up a subcommittee on tax matters (2020/2681(RSO))

(2021/C 362/39)

| — | having regard to the proposal from the Conference of Presidents, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal from the Conference of Presidents,

| — | having regard to its decision of 15 January 2014 on the powers and responsibilities of the standing committees (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its decision of 15 January 2014 on the powers and responsibilities of the standing committees (1),

| — | having regard to Rules 206 and 212 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 206 and 212 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to set up a subcommittee to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Decides that that subcommittee shall be responsible for tax-related matters, and particularly the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, as well as financial transparency for taxation purposes; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Decides that, in Part VI of Annex VI to its Rules of Procedure, the following paragraph is added:
  ‘The committee is assisted by a subcommittee on tax matters, for tax-related matters and particularly the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, as well as financial transparency for taxation purposes’; |
| --- | --- |

3.

‘The committee is assisted by a subcommittee on tax matters, for tax-related matters and particularly the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, as well as financial transparency for taxation purposes’;

| 4. | Decides that the subcommittee shall have 30 members; |
| --- | --- |

4.

| 5. | Decides, with reference to the decisions of the Conference of Presidents of 30 June 2019 and 9 January 2020 relating to the composition of subcommittee bureaux, that the committee bureaux may consist of up to four vice-chairs; |
| --- | --- |

5.

| 6. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

6.

---

(1)  OJ C 482, 23.12.2016, p. 160.

---
Phillip TOWNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GERBER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4511

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Zens ALISMA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1907

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Frank Michael KNOTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4567

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ryan C. MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Levar Tyrese FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 1 2

- 00 028

- CV

______________________________

THE CRAWFORD FAMILY FARM PARTNERSHIP , Appellant

V.

TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE, L.P. , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 80810

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 8, 2012, this Court denied T he Crawford Family Farm Partnership’s (Crawford)

petition for writ of mandamus because the order against which the mandamus was sought, an order

denying a permanent injunction, is, by statute, appealable.

Because Crawford alternatively asked this Court to treat the document as its attempt to

perfect an interlocutory appeal, we filed it on March 8 under this cause number and treated it as a

notice of appeal. We also informed Crawford that due to this being an accelerated, interlocutory

appeal, the record was due ten days from March 8.

When no clerk’s or reporter’s record had been filed by March 26, our clerk’s office

contacted the district clerk and the court reporter. She was informed that no request had been

made for preparation of the record, and no payment had been made for its preparatio n.

Crawford is not indigent and is therefore responsible for payment of the clerk’s and

reporter’s records. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1

, 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3).

On March 26, we contacted Crawford by letter, informing it that a response was to be

received on or before April 6, 2012, and warning that if we did not receive an adequate response

within ten days of March 26, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b), (c).3

We have received no communication from Crawford. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b),

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: April 12, 201 2

Date Decided: April 13, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 15, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-3545]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 230, 232, and 239

[RELEASE NOS. 33-8891; 34-57280; 39-2453; IC-28145; FILE NO. S7-12-07]
RIN 3235-AJ87


Electronic Filing and Revision of Form D

Correction

    In rule document E8-3545 beginning on page 10592 in the issue of 
Wednesday, February 27, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 10609, in the third column, in the first full paragraph, in 
the second to last line, ``Form D'' should read ``Form ID''.

[FR Doc. Z8-3545 Filed 4-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2020221EN.01000201.xml

| 6.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9582 – Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy/Senvion (European onshore wind turbine service)/Ria Blades)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 221/02)

On 20 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9582. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9582. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jhoan Camilo TOLEDO, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 302)

CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER  Pursuant  to  Section  302  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Michael Ward, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ecoloclean  Industries,
Inc., ("Registrant").

(2) Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

(3)  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4)  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any changes in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrant's  other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information ; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: April 20, 2005


By:  /s/ Michael Ward
    -----------------------
    Michael Ward
    Chief Financial Officer
Terrence HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 3D17-1583 3D17-2274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

Terrence Harris, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and LUCK, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

*277Terrence Harris appeals the denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief and the lower Court's Final Order Prohibiting Defendant from Filing Further Pro Se Pleadings in the Circuit Court. We consolidate both appeals and affirm without discussion.

*ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE*

Furthermore, as it appears that Harris has submitted multiple pro se post-conviction appeals,1 all of which have been meritless, we order Harris to show good cause within thirty (30) days why this Court should not prohibit him from submitting further pro se appeals, petitions, motions or other proceedings related to circuit court case number F00-35187A, unless such pleadings are signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing. After this order to show cause and giving Harris an opportunity to respond, this Court may prevent such further filings. *State v. Spencer*, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

Additionally, and absent a showing of good cause, this Court may issue an order to be forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for its consideration of disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017).

Affirmed. Order to show cause issued.

1

*See* 3D15-2638; 3D14-1192; 3D14-1050; 3D12-2972; 3D10-2995; 3D10-412; 3D09-1223; 3D08-3155; 3D07-2990; and 3D07-1255.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(105)
              - district of columbia(33)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(240)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(4)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(16)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(69)
              - north carolina(12)
              - ohio(2)
              - pennsylvania(120)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(214)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(60)
              - (-)wisconsin(2)

## By Year

State News Release        January 13, 2016        Visualize Your Water: A Citizen Science Challenge for High School Students

publication        January 1, 2003        Motorized migrations: The future or mere fantasy?
K P(\S. Shorn fcessler CJtulc of fht CUmor

k.costa. Clerk NOV 13 * POURI OFAPPEALS I WCO,TEXAS_ 

### Bhctes&i plw^ftvd rm Dn? <$£, O^ve^d^A^i lrraVrp» (W $H&S^ rik,+Ku rroVrcn and bt\Y^ \\ \v \h& frUehhfr ?*£ •\^ Cum8* • Plwvit, (kit SWnp Vhu VeVW/ a^ r^iua/i T+ fe rv* 

### OcV vr^ adAw^ SHoWA Vuievo3p (aVsd V&Mt3r iH& Mtw notify vre ©t- ¥Kl> CxurK VvtUv^j On r>\j m^on- ^W\W\ fYVvm kblYYV^ 3QVS ftfirviDw B2I RECEIVEDIN GcM'V^e .T^^lUSZ^ COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS ^^D |()0. ^^7 NOV 24 2015Ma lo-is-opDis'-iui

The $>fafic rf "R^

' \r\\\ toMSL AX). Stolen-C3 FisST Motion Fbr Fxkn+icn of- ~Y\rr^ fx> K"te> 

### It? -fix Wi)horAb]^.~3ucl(ws oS•-^ CwJW-#* triwiVvd NNnicii ^> IWr &Pdi4ion W OUtr^orvl/i) &<tv^ Jen X. )*,*/& ys Mtv\van vnancon Mx^n^he.M^\\^n^r and 4h^ (LqmJII- of fty^A^ lothCtmt>bUfr^m^ OuAicvXl 0\Tfr»ef IT

### ^di+tonerfc rfc&i&St \Vthtf^tenHcp U ^M ttpon t^ Wl\owW\ {Wte' PUifft*fcr u/tfi5 AO*" ^ftH'rrwd- Ot the. d^C/SfC^ o^ A^ tovmi of- &pp^\s in ptWr*j his tf^d^ urfHI. Nwmkur



### ^,9,CIS. %\rx.t-iK^- -Hrv^tht PdK\tvrw K\J b^oi &4rkmptir^ k>0|Cnr) Uy\j fejpmmktii*) \n thV vmH-cr. 1^'S AHt?Kry&) on Vht P$pi«A oW Sehw^Mr, h<\J inftrm&l Pi^Homr Yh&± h& \M\\ VuT* ftpn^itt Hif^ or. YW-Pdih>» (V Drscre>iL>nct'>a) 

### VjKiv^Cod\h, VeHirio^^' pr^v/5 Wu< Count (^ir*nh this

lYVMnWViYio Unit

## t, QfoxMs (XncV toy*.(XDun* ROfr-rY\>b>A (V £^U/fSipnL o^- H^> 

### ~fa Oirxfi; +o tW, SWk- Pv07Ut4,vVnhj (hWaa,j . P.O. CbcY IMdcs;

(X\AsVinT€^/e) I^H \Qn\Ku tte UUV\<k>( o* Mttitmtrftbdf<QoU i>,M\v\\n mow fcWn Witty?,foeiTM prese*^ \n<^ro^ted 

### <?^L Was Qnd borr^dr. 9x&vUHd <M Vhii YKe^ IhV^ dftxj 0-P-*€i\b VWvma-' (Ui^v\AiSi6i4aW?sA HQunU\A\Aiw Ua\> farrrn
Michael WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Fla. Dept. of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4685

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Brian GILLER, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Anita GROSSMAN, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2393

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - utah(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        May 18, 2015        Atmospheric Release of BPA May Reach Nearby Waterways

National News Release        October 17, 2016        Where Does it Go? New Method Evaluates Fate of Methane Released into Streams

National News Release        July 8, 2014        USGS Release: Large Rivers in U.S. are Becoming Less Acidic

National News Release        March 11, 2014        Amazon Carbon Dynamics: Understanding the Photosynthesis-Climate Link

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management

National News Release        February 26, 2024        USGS provides easy access to Colorado River science with new online portal
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.