EXHIBIT 99.1

RISK FACTORS

Statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995). Forward-looking statements include, but by way of example only, statements regarding our expectations relating to the Company's ongoing strategic reassessment, projections of
revenues, costs (direct and operating costs), cost reductions, specific product and service sales and capital expenditures, and the future amounts and relative percentages as compared to total
revenues of our value-added revenues and our operating and service-related costs. These statements, when made, are intended to reflect VIA management's then current views with respect to future events
and expectations and are subject to a number of risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including those discussed below, which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in
such statements.

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF NEGATIVE CASH FLOW AND WE MAY NEVER ACHIEVE POSITIVE CASH FLOW.

For the six months ended June 30, 2002, we had losses from continuing operations, before depreciation, amortization, impairment charges and
non-cash stock compensation of $23.0 million. In order to provide continuing global support to our operations, enable them to deliver quality customer service, and in order to
develop an adequate financial reporting infrastructure, we will have to make significant ongoing expenditures for systems and staff. If we are unable to increase our revenue or scale down our costs
and investment expenditures, we will continue to experience negative cash flow.

From
our inception through the end of 2000, we experienced rapid growth. In anticipation of our continued growth and demand for our services, we scaled up our operations and
infrastructure. Then, in mid-2001 in response to deteriorating economic conditions and declining revenue growth rates in all our markets, we initiated cost-cutting measures,
which we are continuing in 2002. However, we may
have difficulty reducing our costs and scaling down our operations to a level more reflective of current revenue levels. For example, we may find that we cannot cut costs further in any particular
operation without sacrificing appropriate customer or technical service, product delivery or financial control functions. If we are not successful in reducing costs, we may not become
self-sustaining before depleting our cash reserves.

WE ARE IMPLEMENTING A NEW BUSINESS PLAN, WHICH MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL.

During the first quarter 2002, we engaged in a strategic review of our overall operations with a focus of substantially reducing our negative cash flow to ensure
that we reach positive cash flow with significant cash reserves remaining. As a result of that review, we have taken a number of different steps, including the disposal or closure of offices and
country operations, which we conclude would not materially contribute to our financial strength in the long term. We will continue these actions in the future. As we take these actions, we may lose
revenues generated by those offices or operations. In taking any such action, we may also incur significant one-time costs or losses associated with the disposal or shut down of the
offices or operations. These costs or losses may exceed in the short or immediate term any benefit we gain from eliminating a loss-generating operation, which would adversely affect our
operating results during the relevant period.

We
also face the following additional risks in implementing our new business plan:



43

---



AS WE DISPOSE OF CERTAIN OF OUR COUNTRY OPERATIONS, WE MAY REDUCE OUR REVENUES IN THE SHORT OR INTERMEDIATE TERM FASTER THAN WE CAN REDUCE OUR EXPENSES.

During the second quarter 2002, we sold our operations in Argentina, Austria and Brazil. On August 12, 2002, we closed the sale of our operation in
Ireland. We are considering the disposition of certain other operations and in one case we are pursuing an auction process for the sale of that operation. While the intent of these dispositions is,
among other things, to eliminate the cash drain of loss-generating operations on our consolidated operations, these dispositions in the aggregate may also significantly reduce our core
revenue base. Unless we are able to generate additional revenues from our remaining operations or through acquisitions, we may find that our in-country operations are unable to generate
sufficient free cash flow in the aggregate to support the corporate technical, finance, legal and administrative service expenditures necessary to adequately maintain a public multi-national company.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in these further efforts and no assurance that, even if closed and completed, these transactions would lead to a material reduction of our negative
cash flow.

OUR COST CUTTING MEASURES MAY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS.

From June 1998 through December 2000, we acquired 26 companies and at the peak in March 2001 we had over 1,200 employees. A continuing
economic slowdown has created lower revenue growth expectations and limited access to capital markets. Therefore, the need to scale costs to these lower revenue growth expectations without reducing
service quality has become a priority. To address this priority, we have and will continue to take steps to reduce our costs. We reduced our combined employee count to 725 by June 30, 2002 and
may further reduce staff. These measures may impair our ability to attract and retain key employees. As we continue these cost cutting measures, we may also impair our ability to provide quality
service, attract new customers and implement integrated operating, administrative, financial and accounting systems and controls.

IF DEMAND FOR INTERNET SERVICES IN OUR MARKETS DOES NOT GROW AS WE EXPECT, OUR ABILITY TO GROW OUR REVENUES WILL BE NEGATIVELY AFFECTED.

Compared to the U.S., Internet use in our markets is relatively low. Moreover, we are focusing our sales and marketing efforts on the more sophisticated
value-added services. If the market for Internet services fails to develop, or develops more slowly than expected, we may not be able to increase our

44

---

revenues at the rate we have projected. Obstacles to the development of Internet services in our markets include:



In
particular, we depend on increasing demand for Internet services by small to mid-sized businesses in our markets. Demand for Internet services by these businesses will
depend partly on the degree to which these businesses' customers and suppliers adopt the Internet as a means of doing business, and partly to the extent by which these businesses adopt Internet
technologies to deal with internal business processes, such as internal communications. Demand will also depend on whether there is a continuing economic downturn in these markets, which may result in
a cutback of expenditures of the services we offer. Furthermore, as competitive pressures drive down customer prices for Internet access in many of our markets, we depend increasingly in such markets
on our ability to sell to our customers higher margin, value added services such as security services, web hosting, and ecommerce solutions. Due to an increasing number of business failures in the
Internet services industry in our core markets, an increase in customer reluctance to rely on third party service providers in the Internet services industry for critical business functions may also
reduce our revenue growth and increase our cost of sales by lengthening sales cycles.

COMPETITION FOR CUSTOMERS IN OUR MARKETS MAY CAUSE US TO REDUCE OUR PRICES OR INCREASE SPENDING, WHICH MAY NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR REVENUES AND OPERATING
RESULTS.

There are competitors in our markets with more significant market presence and brand recognition and greater financial, technical and personnel resources than we
have. Although the competitors we face vary depending on the market and the country, these competitors may include local and regional Internet services providers, telecommunication companies and cable
companies. Some of our competitors, especially the telecommunications companies, have large networks in place as well as a significant existing customer base. As a result of this competition, we may
face significant pressure to reduce our prices, particularly with respect to Internet access services, and to improve the products and services we offer.

IF WE FAIL TO INTEGRATE OUR NEW MANAGEMENT TEAM, OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY SUFFER.

VIA has experienced significant turnover in management in the recent past, which may continue. In addition to the turnover in management at the operations level,
our entire corporate management team, with the exception of our general counsel, has all left VIA since November 2001. We have hired a number of new officers and appointed an acting chief
executive officer to replace our prior chief executive officer who resigned in January 2002. We continue to search for a permanent replacement, but there can be no assurances that we will be
successful in finding an appropriate permanent chief executive officer. In addition, we plan to relocate a number of executive and key corporate positions from Reston, Virginia office to Europe in
order to bring corporate decision-making closer to the majority of our operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in convincing current personnel in these positions to relocate
and these persons may leave VIA as a result. Our operations

45

---

may suffer from the loss of institutional knowledge resulting from these departures or from our inability to replace key senior management personnel in a timely fashion.

IF WE FAIL TO MODIFY, REPLACE OR REPAIR LEGACY PROVISIONING, BILLING AND CUSTOMER CARE SYSTEMS AND PRACTICES IN OUR OPERATIONS, WE MAY LOSE CUSTOMERS
AND REVENUE AND FAIL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE INTERNAL CONTROLS.

We have suspended the development and deployment of the integrated provisioning, billing and customer care platform that was intended to replace legacy systems or
automate manual processes in our operations. As a result of this suspension, we will have to replace or repair certain of these legacy systems in order to ensure that we can properly provision our
services, bill and service our customers and report accurately our results. If we fail to take the required action in a timely manner, we may lose customers and revenue and be unable to maintain
adequate internal controls. The integrated platform was intended to establish a common IT platform for all our operations to provision, bill and service customers for a common product catalogue. Our
lack of a common platform may impair our ability to introduce new products and make us less competitive. In addition, our independent accountants have advised us that certain of our legacy billing
practices constitute material weaknesses in our internal control structure. These material weaknesses have continued in 2002. For example, we have restated our financial results for the first quarter
2002. This restatement is attributable to the difficulties we have experienced with the billing platform and practices in our UK operation. If we do not remedy the weaknesses, our ability to detect
errors or fraud in amounts that would be material to our financial statements will be significantly limited.

OUR IN-COUNTRY INTEGRATION EFFORTS MAY CONTINUE TO LEAD TO TURNOVER OF STAFF IN KEY POSITIONS AND A DISTRACTION FROM REVENUE-GENERATING
OPPORTUNITIES, CUSTOMER SERVICE AND IMPORTANT CONTROL FUNCTIONS.

We acquired multiple operations in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Switzerland. In each of these countries, we have taken steps to
integrate the separate companies acquired in that country into a single operation. These efforts created ongoing operational and personnel disruptions that have led and may further lead to the loss of
personnel in key positions. In addition, integration activities require significant attention from key management and staff at these operations, which have and may continue to distract management and
staff from revenue-generating opportunities, customer service and internal control functions and have negatively affected and may continue to negatively affect our results. The pace at which these
integrations were implemented strained the administrative, operational, personnel and financial resources of certain of these country operations, particularly in Germany and the U.K., and has exposed
material weaknesses in systems and internal controls at these operations. We have expended and will continue to expend significant expense and corporate management time to address these weaknesses.
There can be no assurances that we will be successful in these efforts. If we fail to properly address these issues, our business may be disrupted and adversely affected and our ability to detect
errors in amounts that would be material to our financial statements will be significantly limited.

SOME COMPANIES WITH WHICH WE DO BUSINESS MAY HAVE FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES THAT WOULD PREVENT THEM FROM PROVIDING THE SERVICES THEY HAVE AGREED TO PROVIDE
US.

In January 2002, Global Crossing and certain other affiliated subsidiaries filed for U.S. bankruptcy protection. A number of groups have publicly stated
their intentions to submit proposals to acquire some or all of the assets or the businesses of Global Crossing. Global Crossing has continued to maintain service on the trans-Atlantic rings on which
we have acquired IRU capacity and has publicly stated its intention to continue most or all of its network services upon reorganization. If service on our

46

---

trans-Atlantic IRU is interrupted or terminated because of the financial difficulties or decisions made in the course of the bankruptcy proceedings of Global Crossing, peering and transit
relationships we have in place from our pan-European backbone network will provide contingency and quality backup capabilities for our Internet traffic to reach U.S. destinations. However,
if we are required to rely on these peering and transit relationship for all of our trans-Atlantic traffic, we may incur additional costs and experience a lesser quality of service in reaching
non-European destinations. There can be no assurances that Global Crossing or any potential acquirers of its assets or business will continue to provide service on the facilities on which
we acquired trans-Atlantic capacity, and in such an event, our ability to provide quality levels of IP service may be impacted.

OUR BRAND NAMES ARE DIFFICULT TO PROTECT AND MAY INFRINGE ON THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES.

We are aware of other companies using or claiming to have rights to use trademarks that are similar to our marks and variations of those marks, including the VIA
NET.WORKS mark. We have received several demands from third parties to cease and desist using one or more of our trademarks. The users of these or similar marks may be found to have senior rights if
they were ever to assert a claim against us for trademark infringement. If an infringement suit were instituted against us, even if groundless, it could result in substantial litigation expenses in
defending the suit. If such a suit were to be successful, we could be forced to cease using the mark and to pay damages. Moreover, if we are forced to stop using any of our trademarks, we may have to
expend significant resources to establish new brands and our operating results may be materially impacted.

WE HAVE BEEN NAMED AS A DEFENDANT IN A SECURITIES CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT, WHICH COULD DISTRACT OUR MANAGEMENT AND IMPACT OUR CASH POSITION.

On November 5, 2001, we were named as a defendant in a class action lawsuit in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against VIA
NET.WORKS, Inc., certain of the underwriters who supported our initial public offering ("IPO") and certain of our officers, under the title O'Leary v. Via Net.works (sic) et al
[01-CV-9720] (the "Complaint"). An amended complaint was filed in April 2002. The Complaint alleges that the prospectus we filed with our
registration statement in connection with our IPO was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) the named underwriters had solicited and
received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for the right to purchase large blocks of VIA IPO shares; and (ii) the named Underwriters had entered into
agreements with certain of their customers to allocate VIA IPO shares in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional VIA shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined
prices ("Tie-in Arrangements"), thereby artificially inflating the Company's stock price. The Complaint further alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of
1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder arising out of the alleged failure to disclose and the alleged materially
misleading disclosures made with respect to the commissions and the Tie-in Arrangements in the prospectus. The plaintiffs in this action seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount. The
defense of this action may distract our senior management from the normal operation of business and may cause us to incur substantial defense costs. While we believe that the allegations are without
merit and have engaged counsel to defend the action, if we are determined to be liable or if we conclude that a settlement is in our best interests, we may incur substantial costs.

FLUCTUATIONS IN THE EXCHANGE RATE BETWEEN THE U.S. DOLLAR AND THE VARIOUS CURRENCIES IN WHICH WE CONDUCT BUSINESS MAY AFFECT OUR OPERATING RESULTS.

We record the revenues and expenses of our local operations in their home currencies and translate these amounts into U.S. dollars for purposes of reporting our
consolidated results. As a result,

47

---

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our revenues, expenses and results of operations as well as the value of our assets and liabilities. Fluctuations may adversely
affect the comparability of period-to-period results. If the average value of the Euro decreases in relation to the U.S dollar during a quarterly period as compared to the
prior period, each Euro will convert to fewer U.S dollars during that quarterly period than the prior period and we will report lower revenue growth than what would have been calculated in local
currencies for that period. In addition, we hold foreign currency balances that will create foreign exchange gains or losses, depending upon the relative values of the foreign currency at the
beginning and end of the reporting period, affecting our net income and earnings per share. In projecting future operating results, we make certain assumptions about the fluctuation of the home
currencies of our operations. If these assumptions turn out to be materially inaccurate, our actual operating results may be materially different from our projections.

REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF THE COUNTRIES WHERE OUR OPERATING COMPANIES ARE LOCATED ARE UNCERTAIN AND MAY DECREASE DEMAND FOR OUR SERVICES,
INCREASE OUR COST OF DOING BUSINESS OR OTHERWISE REDUCE OUR BUSINESS PROSPECTS.

Our operating companies are located in countries with rapidly changing regulatory and economic conditions that may affect the Internet services industry. Any new
law or regulation pertaining to the Internet or telecommunications, or the application or interpretation of existing laws, could decrease demand for our services, increase our costs, or otherwise
reduce our profitability or business prospects. Specific examples of the types of laws or regulations that could adversely affect us include laws that



For
example, a number of European countries have enacted legislation that requires Internet services providers to establish technical means to permit national authorities to intercept
data traffic of identified customers. The application of these laws to Internet services providers has been subject to significant opposition from Internet services providers industry groups in
Germany, the U.K. and the Netherlands, among others, because of the substantial cost service providers would incur in order to comply with the law. Ultimately, these requirements may impose
significant costs on our European operations in these countries, which would negatively impact our operating results. These laws could require us to incur costs to comply with them or to incur new
liability. They could also increase our competition or change our competitive environment so that customer demand for our products and services is affected.

In
addition to risks we face from new laws or regulations, we face uncertainties in connection with the application of existing laws to the Internet. It may take years to determine the
manner in which existing laws governing issues like property ownership, libel, negligence and personal privacy will be applied to communications and commerce over the Internet.

48

---

WE RELY ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROVIDERS IN OUR MARKETS TO PROVIDE OUR CUSTOMERS WITH RELIABLE ACCESS TO OUR SERVICES, AND FAILURES OR DELAYS IN
PROVIDING ACCESS COULD LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO SERVICE OUR CUSTOMERS AND IMPACT OUR REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS.

Our customers typically access our services either through their normal telephone lines or dedicated lines provided by local telecommunications providers
specifically for the purposes of accessing the Internet. In some of our markets, we experience delays in delivery of new telephone or dedicated lines that prevent our customers from accessing our
services. These delays result in lost revenues. Additionally, some local telecommunications providers that provide Internet services provide delivery of telephone or dedicated lines to their own
Internet customers on a preferential basis, which may cause us to lose current and potential customers. We also lease network capacity from telecommunications providers and rely on the quality and
availability of their service. These companies may experience disruptions of service, which could disrupt our services to, or limit Internet access for, our customers. We may not be able to replace or
supplement these services on a timely basis or in a cost-effective manner, which may result in customer dissatisfaction and lost revenues. In addition, to the extent that alternative local
access providers fail in any particular market, the incumbent telecommunications providers will experience less competitive price pressure for access, which could increase our cost structures and
impair our profit margins.

WE DEPEND ON THE RELIABILITY OF OUR NETWORK, AND A SYSTEM FAILURE OR A BREACH OF OUR SECURITY MEASURES COULD RESULT IN A LOSS OF CUSTOMERS AND REDUCED
REVENUES.

We are able to deliver services only to the extent that we can protect our network systems against damages from telecommunication failures, computer viruses,
natural disasters and unauthorized access. Any system failure, accident or security breach that causes interruptions in our operations could impair our ability to provide Internet services to our
customers and negatively impact our revenues and results of operations. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss or damage to our customers' data or applications, or
inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. In addition, we may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions or security
breaches. Although we currently possess errors and omissions insurance and business interruption insurance these policies may not provide effective coverage upon the occurrence of all events.

WE MAY BE LIABLE FOR INFORMATION DISSEMINATED OVER OUR NETWORK.

We may face liability for information carried on or disseminated through our network. Some types of laws that may result in our liability for information
disseminated over our network include:



The
laws governing these matters vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

WE CANNOT ASSURE YOU OF THE CONTINUED LISTING OF OUR COMMON STOCK ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET.

On March 21, 2002, we received a letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. indicating that our common stock has failed to meet Nasdaq's requirement
that the common stock trade above $1.00 per

49

---

share because it traded below $1.00 per share for the preceding 30 consecutive trading days. Nasdaq informed us that, if the bid price of shares of our common stock does not close at or above $1.00
for at least 10 consecutive trading days prior to June 19, 2002, we would be notified that our common stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market. Nasdaq also notified us that we
could apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, on which we would be afforded up to an additional 270 days to come into compliance with Nasdaq's minimum bid price and other
requirements.

On
June     , 2002, the Company applied to transfer its listing to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. On June 25, 2002, Nasdaq notified the Company that its application
to transfer from the National Market to the SmallCap Market was approved effective at the opening of the market on June 27, 2002. In order to maintain a listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market,
VIA must maintain the continuing listing standards for the SmallCap Market, which includes minimum stockholders' equity of $2.5 million, a public float of 500,000 shares, market value of
publicly held shares of $1 million, at least 2 market makers and a minimum bid price of at least $1 per share. VIA currently meets all of the standards other than the $1 per share bid price. If
our stock price fails to rise above the minimum price by September 19, 2002 but we continue to meet the other listing standards, we will be eligible for a further grace period of up to
180 days until March 19, 2003 to meet all the standards.

If
our common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, we could trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, which is substantially less liquid than either the Nasdaq National Market or
the SmallCap Market. If VIA's common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq markets, the trading market for our common stock could be disrupted, which could make it difficult for investors to trade in our
common stock and may result in a reduction in the market price of shares of our common stock. This lack of liquidity would also make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

We
cannot assure you that our common stock will come into compliance with Nasdaq's minimum bid price requirement prior to March 19, 2003. Nor can we assure you that we will be
able to maintain compliance with Nasdaq's other requirements for listing on Nasdaq's SmallCap Market.

REACTION BY CUSTOMERS, INVESTORS OR REGULATORS TO RESTATEMENTS OF OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS MAY ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR REVENUES AND EXPENSES.

During 2001, we restated our financial results for 2000 and for the first and second quarters of 2001. In August 2002, we restated our financial results
for the first quarter of 2002. As a result of the
restatements, we may be subject to adverse customer reaction, which may make it more difficult to attract and retain customers and lead to loss of revenues. Adverse investor reaction and inquiries by
regulators may divert management's attention from core business needs or strategic opportunities, reduce revenue opportunities or increase costs.

50

---

QuickLinks