alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Wonder Auto Technology, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Meirong Yuan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Meirong YuanMeirong
      Yuan
                Chief
      Financial Officer





March 30,
2009
William H. SMITH and Julie L. Lawson, Appellants, v. James M. WILLIAMS, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 1D17-3743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Rozalia GELFENBOYM and Bentsion Zilbershteyn, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY as Trustee FOR the HOLDERS OF NEW CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-A, ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Antonio Angelo DANGELO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4461

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 09, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 25996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4200-N-59]


Notice of Proposed Information Collection for Public Comment

Correction

    In notice document 97-11533 beginning on page 24499 in the issue of 
Monday, May 5, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 24499, in the second column, in the DATES section, ``June 
7, 1997'' should read ``July 7, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Terry Wayne GUFFEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020005EN.01000101.xml

| 9.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9583 — TPG/Hong Leong Group/Columbia Asia Healthcare)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 5/01)

On 10 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9583. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9583. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(20)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(11)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 11, 2019        Brian Miller at Wind Cave National Park

Photography        March 22, 2018        Cave diving scientists

Photography        March 11, 2021        Boulder Ice Cave Glacier 1932 and 1988

Photography        June 1, 2016        USGS Research Ecologist Jeff Lovich gets ready to release a male desert tortoise

Photography        December 31, 1985        Packrat at its midden

Photography        December 31, 1985        Packrat midden

Photography        March 17, 2018        USGS in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
Lester JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3273

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Coleman, Willis and Annunziata Argued at Salem, Virginia

DONNIE WAYNE SENSABAUGH MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1829-97-3 JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. JUNE 23, 1998 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Paul F. Fantl, Assistant Public Defender (Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. Ruth Ann Morken, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Donnie Wayne Sensabaugh contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove that he released a substance proscribed by Code § 18.2-312. Because the question he presents lacks justiciability, we dismiss the appeal. On September 2, 1996, Sensabaugh sprayed Beverly Ervin, Gregory Ervin and Donna Vencill with pepper spray. On November 4, 1996, he was indicted for three felony counts of violating Code § 18.2-312, which proscribes the release of certain gases under specific circumstances, and for three misdemeanor counts of assault and battery in violation of Code § 18.2-57. After trying the charges without the intervention of a jury, the trial court announced that it found Sensabaugh guilty of unlawful wounding on

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - each of the felony counts. It dismissed the assault and battery charges. The conviction and sentencing orders recite that Sensabaugh was convicted of unlawful wounding in violation of Code § 18.2-51. Nothing in the record indicates that the trial court modified, vacated or suspended those orders within twenty-one days after entry, or that Sensabaugh objected to the accuracy of

those orders. See Rule 1:1. Accordingly, we presume that the orders accurately state what transpired. See Kern v.

Commonwealth , 2 Va. App. 84, 88, 341 S.E.2d 397, 400 (1986). "Only questions presented in the petition for appeal will be noticed by the Court of Appeals." Rule 5A:12(c). In his petition for appeal, Sensabaugh requested that we review: "Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove Sensabaugh guilty beyond a reasonable [doubt] of unlawful release of a substance proscribed by Section 18.2-312?" Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the question presented is moot. "As a general rule, '[m]oot questions are not justiciable and courts do not rule on such questions to avoid issuing advisory opinions.'" In Re Times-World Corporation , 7 Va. App. 317, 323, 373 S.E.2d 474, 477 (1988) (quoting United

States v. Peters , 754 F.2d 753, 757 (7th Cir. 1985)). See Potts

v. Mathieson Alkali Works , 165 Va. 196, 225, 181 S.E. 521, 533 (1935). The question and argument posed by Sensabaugh concern whether pepper spray is a gas prohibited by Code § 18.2-312.- 3 - However, this issue has no bearing on his convictions for unlawful wounding under Code § 18.2-51. Thus, Sensabaugh has presented no issue bearing on his convictions. Cf. Myers v.

Commonwealth , 26 Va. App. 554, 496 S.E.2d 80 (1998).

Dismissed.
William Houston KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Feb.17.2015 08:10PM J McCombs 8136571498

JAMES C. McCOMBS MaJor Gnnnral USAF

. (Retired) 

### Subject: Instructor Pilot Certification PAGE. 1/ 1

Aside from 

### Air Training Command (ATC) pilots being assignedto train basic pilottraining normalinstructor upgrades were completedin the pilofs squadron ofassignment and were not presented 

### with Air Force 

### wide certificates. The normal procedure was to have the IP candidate (selected 

### due to their potential)do an in-depth studytheir type ofaircraft and it's instruction procedures, pass an exam on both, be scheduled on one or more practice flights with an instructor andthen be given a check flight 

### by a flight examiner. Ifsuccessful, the candidate then met a squadronboard normally headed

### by the Commander or the Operations Officer and 

### if he/she did well with the board they were certified asinstructor qualified. 

### As 

### a former Squadron Commander and an

### Airlift Wing Commander I upgraded more than my

### fair share C-9 

### (military DC-9) and C141 instructorpilots andfelt very comfortable with 

### them training young pilots that I was sending around the world on some very difficult Air Force missions
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)

## By Year

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Coastal breach in St. Augustine, Florida caused by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Breach on Portsmouth Island in North Carolina caused by Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Part of the Outer Banks in North Carolina eroded by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        February 10, 2023        Boulder, Colorado

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        GOES-16 and Landsat 8
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

2309 

Vol. 71, No. 9 

Friday, January 13, 2006 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 310 

[Docket Nos. 1976N–0052N (formerly 

1976N–052N) and 1981N–0022 (formerly 

81N–0022)] 

RIN 0910–AF34, 0910–AF45 

Phenylpropanolamine-Containing Drug 

Products for Over-the-Counter Human 

Use; Tentative Final Monographs 

Correction 

In proposed rule document E5–7646 

beginning on page 75988 in the issue of 

Thursday, December 22, 2005, make the 

following corrections: 

§ 310.545 [Corrected] 

1. On page 75997, in the third 

column, in § 310.545(a)(6)(ii)(D), 

‘‘Approved as of January 23, 2006’’ 

should read ‘‘Approved as of [date 30 

days after date of publication in the 

Federal Register].’’ 

2. On the same page, in the same 

column, in §310.545(a)(20)(ii), 

‘‘Approved as of January 23, 2006’’ 

should read ‘‘Approved as of [date 30 

days after date of publication in the 

Federal Register].’’ 

3. On the same page, in the same 

column, in §310.545(d)(35), in the first 

line, ‘‘January 23, 2006’’ should read 

‘‘[Date 30 days after date of publication 

in the Federal Register]’’. 

[FR Doc. Z5–7646 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
# C_2021323EN.01002501.xml

| 11.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/25

---

P9_TA(2020)0061

EU-Belarus Agreement on readmission of persons residing without authorisation ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 May 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (12158/2019 — C9-0004/2020 — 2019/0181(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 323/10)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12158/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12158/2019),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (12160/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (12160/2019),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0004/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 79(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0004/2020),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0097/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0097/2020),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Belarus. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020417EN.01005501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/55 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10069 — HDI Assicurazioni/Amissima Assicurazioni)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 417/07)

1.

On 24 November 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020417EN.01005501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | HDI Assicurazioni S.p.A. (‘HDI’, Italy), controlled by the Talanx Group (‘Talanx’, Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Amissima Assicurazioni S.p.A. (‘Amissima’, Italy). |

HDI acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Amissima.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for HDI: provision and distribution of life and non-life insurance products in Italy, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Talanx: provision and distribution of insurance and reinsurance products worldwide, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Amissima: provision and distribution of non-life insurance products in Italy. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020417EN.01005501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10069 — HDI Assicurazioni/Amissima Assicurazioni

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020417EN.01005501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020417EN.01005501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth WHITMORE

NO. 2017-KP-1434

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
# C_2020214EN.01000401.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/4

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.9564 – LSEG/Refinitiv Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 214/04)

On 22 June 2020, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+ 32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.9564 – LSEG/Refinitiv Business, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
DeSoto Parish Sheriff Jayson RICHARDSON v. Louisiana Legislative Auditor Daryl G. PURPERA

NO. 2018-CC-1326

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheric Lamb Wave

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)

## By Location

## By Year

Animated GIF        May 1, 2022        Idealized animation of tsunamis in the Kingdom of Tonga looking north-northeast

Animated GIF        May 1, 2022        Idealized animation of tsunamis in the Kingdom of Tonga

publication        May 12, 2022        Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga
Exhibit 32.1

                           Certifications Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

      In connection with the Annual Report of Touchstone Resources USA, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), I, Roger L.
Abel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Stephen C. Haynes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to my knowledge:

      (1)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Roger L. Abel
                                          -----------------
                                          Roger L. Abel
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                          /s/ Stephen C. Haynes
                                          ---------------------
                                          Stephen C. Haynes
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 31, 2006
Antonio JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1223

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.