# Patent

## Title
Delayed authentication debug policy

## Abstract

A chassis platform, such as processor or a system-on-chip (SoC), includes logic to implement a debug chassis security system including a policy generator to control access from a test access port. The policy generator may distribute a debug policy to at least one logic block that locally enforces the debug policy. The debug policy may include a delayed authentication policy in which debug assets are distributed and the chassis platform is initially locked to prevent debug access via the test access port. An authenticated debug user may unlock the chassis platform at a later time to enable debugging operations. The debug policy may also include a live execution policy and an immediate debug policy.

## Background
RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/580,588 filed Dec. 23, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present disclosure pertains to the field of processing logic, microprocessors, and associated instruction set architecture that, when executed by the processor or other processing logic, perform logical, mathematical, or other functional operations.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART
Microprocessors (or simply “processors”) may support external testing through test access ports that can be used for debugging processor functionality. Debugging may be performed by a user accessing the test access ports at machines including the processors. Debugging may involve unlocking a large number of portions of a processor each power cycle, and keeping physical control over the portions until they are shut down. A user may be authenticated when debugging through the test access port.



DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the Figures of the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1A is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system formed with a processor that may include execution units to execute an instruction, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 1B illustrates a data processing system, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 1C illustrates other embodiments of a data processing system for performing text string comparison operations;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the micro-architecture for a processor that may include logic circuits to perform instructions, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3A illustrates various packed data type representations in multimedia registers, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3B illustrates possible in-register data storage formats, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3C illustrates various signed and unsigned packed data type representations in multimedia registers, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3D illustrates an embodiment of an operation encoding format;
FIG. 3E illustrates another possible operation encoding format having forty or more bits, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3F illustrates yet another possible operation encoding format, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4A is a block diagram illustrating an in-order pipeline and a register renaming stage, out-of-order issue/execution pipeline, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4B is a block diagram illustrating an in-order architecture core and a register renaming logic, out-of-order issue/execution logic to be included in a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5B is a block diagram of an example implementation of a core, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a system, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a second system, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a third system in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a system-on-a-chip, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 10 illustrates a processor containing a central processing unit and a graphics processing unit which may perform at least one instruction, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating the development of IP cores, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 12 illustrates how an instruction of a first type may be emulated by a processor of a different type, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 13 illustrates a block diagram contrasting the use of a software instruction converter to convert binary instructions in a source instruction set to binary instructions in a target instruction set, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of an instruction set architecture of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 15 is a more detailed block diagram of an instruction set architecture of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 16 is a block diagram of an execution pipeline for an instruction set architecture of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 17 is a block diagram of an electronic device for utilizing a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 18A illustrates an example embodiment of a chassis platform for implementing a delayed authentication debug policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 18B illustrates an example embodiment of a debug chassis security system for implementing a delayed authentication debug policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure; and
FIGS. 19A, 19B, and 19C are illustrations of an example method for implementing a delayed authentication debug policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The following description describes processing logic for implementing a delayed authentication debug policy in a debug chassis security system within or in association with a processor, a system-on-chip (SoC), or other processing apparatus. In the following description, numerous specific details such as processing logic, processor types, micro-architectural conditions, events, enablement mechanisms, and the like are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be appreciated, however, by one skilled in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without such specific details. Additionally, some well-known structures, circuits, and the like have not been shown in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring embodiments of the present disclosure.
Although the following embodiments are described with reference to a processor, other embodiments are applicable to other types of integrated circuits and logic devices. Similar techniques and teachings of embodiments of the present disclosure may be applied to other types of circuits or semiconductor devices that may benefit from higher pipeline throughput and improved performance. The teachings of embodiments of the present disclosure are applicable to any processor or machine that performs data manipulations. However, the embodiments are not limited to processors or machines that perform 512-bit, 256-bit, 128-bit, 64-bit, 32-bit, or 16-bit data operations and may be applied to any processor and machine in which manipulation or management of data may be performed. In addition, the following description provides examples, and the accompanying drawings show various examples for the purposes of illustration. However, these examples should not be construed in a limiting sense as they are merely intended to provide examples of embodiments of the present disclosure rather than to provide an exhaustive list of all possible implementations of embodiments of the present disclosure.
Although the below examples describe instruction handling and distribution in the context of execution units and logic circuits, other embodiments of the present disclosure may be accomplished by way of a data or instructions stored on a machine-readable, tangible medium, which when performed by a machine cause the machine to perform functions consistent with at least one embodiment of the disclosure. In one embodiment, functions associated with embodiments of the present disclosure are embodied in machine-executable instructions. The instructions may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor that may be programmed with the instructions to perform the steps of the present disclosure. Embodiments of the present disclosure may be provided as a computer program product or software which may include a machine or computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform one or more operations according to embodiments of the present disclosure. Furthermore, steps of embodiments of the present disclosure might be performed by specific hardware components that contain fixed-function logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and fixed-function hardware components.
Instructions used to program logic to perform embodiments of the present disclosure may be stored within a memory in the system, such as DRAM, cache, flash memory, or other storage. Furthermore, the instructions may be distributed via a network or by way of other computer-readable media. Thus a machine-readable medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer), but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, Compact Disc, Read-Only Memory (CD-ROMs), and magneto-optical disks, Read-Only Memory (ROMs), Random Access Memory (RAM), Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or a tangible, machine-readable storage used in the transmission of information over the Internet via electrical, optical, acoustical or other forms of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.). Accordingly, the computer-readable medium may include any type of tangible machine-readable medium suitable for storing or transmitting electronic instructions or information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer).
A design may go through various stages, from creation to simulation to fabrication. Data representing a design may represent the design in a number of manners. First, as may be useful in simulations, the hardware may be represented using a hardware description language or another functional description language. Additionally, a circuit level model with logic and/or transistor gates may be produced at some stages of the design process. Furthermore, designs, at some stage, may reach a level of data representing the physical placement of various devices in the hardware model. In cases where some semiconductor fabrication techniques are used, the data representing the hardware model may be the data specifying the presence or absence of various features on different mask layers for masks used to produce the integrated circuit. In any representation of the design, the data may be stored in any form of a machine-readable medium. A memory or a magnetic or optical storage such as a disc may be the machine-readable medium to store information transmitted via optical or electrical wave modulated or otherwise generated to transmit such information. When an electrical carrier wave indicating or carrying the code or design is transmitted, to the extent that copying, buffering, or retransmission of the electrical signal is performed, a new copy may be made. Thus, a communication provider or a network provider may store on a tangible, machine-readable medium, at least temporarily, an article, such as information encoded into a carrier wave, embodying techniques of embodiments of the present disclosure.
In modern processors, a number of different execution units may be used to process and execute a variety of code and instructions. Some instructions may be quicker to complete while others may take a number of clock cycles to complete. The faster the throughput of instructions, the better the overall performance of the processor. Thus it would be advantageous to have as many instructions execute as fast as possible. However, there may be certain instructions that have greater complexity and require more in terms of execution time and processor resources, such as floating point instructions, load/store operations, data moves, etc.
As more computer systems are used in internet, text, and multimedia applications, additional processor support has been introduced over time. In one embodiment, an instruction set may be associated with one or more computer architectures, including data types, instructions, register architecture, addressing modes, memory architecture, interrupt and exception handling, and external input and output (I/O).
In one embodiment, the instruction set architecture (ISA) may be implemented by one or more micro-architectures, which may include processor logic and circuits used to implement one or more instruction sets. Accordingly, processors with different micro-architectures may share at least a portion of a common instruction set. For example, Intel® Pentium 4 processors, Intel® CoreTM processors, and processors from Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. of Sunnyvale Calif. implement nearly identical versions of the x86 instruction set (with some extensions that have been added with newer versions), but have different internal designs. Similarly, processors designed by other processor development companies, such as ARM Holdings, Ltd., MIPS, or their licensees or adopters, may share at least a portion a common instruction set, but may include different processor designs. For example, the same register architecture of the ISA may be implemented in different ways in different micro-architectures using new or well-known techniques, including dedicated physical registers, one or more dynamically allocated physical registers using a register renaming mechanism (e.g., the use of a Register Alias Table (RAT), a Reorder Buffer (ROB) and a retirement register file. In one embodiment, registers may include one or more registers, register architectures, register files, or other register sets that may or may not be addressable by a software programmer.
An instruction may include one or more instruction formats. In one embodiment, an instruction format may indicate various fields (number of bits, location of bits, etc.) to specify, among other things, the operation to be performed and the operands on which that operation will be performed. In a further embodiment, some instruction formats may be further defined by instruction templates (or sub-formats). For example, the instruction templates of a given instruction format may be defined to have different subsets of the instruction format's fields and/or defined to have a given field interpreted differently. In one embodiment, an instruction may be expressed using an instruction format (and, if defined, in a given one of the instruction templates of that instruction format) and specifies or indicates the operation and the operands upon which the operation will operate.
Scientific, financial, auto-vectorized general purpose, RMS (recognition, mining, and synthesis), and visual and multimedia applications (e.g., 2D/3D graphics, image processing, video compression/decompression, voice recognition algorithms and audio manipulation) may require the same operation to be performed on a large number of data items. In one embodiment, Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) refers to a type of instruction that causes a processor to perform an operation on multiple data elements. SIMD technology may be used in processors that may logically divide the bits in a register into a number of fixed-sized or variable-sized data elements, each of which represents a separate value. For example, in one embodiment, the bits in a 64-bit register may be organized as a source operand containing four separate 16-bit data elements, each of which represents a separate 16-bit value. This type of data may be referred to as ‘packed’ data type or ‘vector’ data type, and operands of this data type may be referred to as packed data operands or vector operands. In one embodiment, a packed data item or vector may be a sequence of packed data elements stored within a single register, and a packed data operand or a vector operand may a source or destination operand of a SIMD instruction (or ‘packed data instruction’ or a ‘vector instruction’). In one embodiment, a SIMD instruction specifies a single vector operation to be performed on two source vector operands to generate a destination vector operand (also referred to as a result vector operand) of the same or different size, with the same or different number of data elements, and in the same or different data element order.
SIMD technology, such as that employed by the Intel® CoreTM processors having an instruction set including x86, MMXTM, Streaming SIMD Extensions (SSE), SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, and SSE4.2 instructions, ARM processors, such as the ARM Cortex® family of processors having an instruction set including the Vector Floating Point (VFP) and/or NEON instructions, and MIPS processors, such as the Loongson family of processors developed by the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, has enabled a significant improvement in application performance (CoreTM and MMXTM are registered trademarks or trademarks of Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif.).
In one embodiment, destination and source registers/data may be generic terms to represent the source and destination of the corresponding data or operation. In some embodiments, they may be implemented by registers, memory, or other storage areas having other names or functions than those depicted. For example, in one embodiment, “DEST1” may be a temporary storage register or other storage area, whereas “SRC1” and “SRC2” may be a first and second source storage register or other storage area, and so forth. In other embodiments, two or more of the SRC and DEST storage areas may correspond to different data storage elements within the same storage area (e.g., a SIMD register). In one embodiment, one of the source registers may also act as a destination register by, for example, writing back the result of an operation performed on the first and second source data to one of the two source registers serving as a destination registers.
FIG. 1A is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system formed with a processor that may include execution units to execute an instruction, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. System 100 may include a component, such as a processor 102 to employ execution units including logic to perform algorithms for process data, in accordance with the present disclosure, such as in the embodiment described herein. System 100 may be representative of processing systems based on the PENTIUM® III, PENTIUM® 4, XeonTM, Itanium®, XScaleTM and/or StrongARMTM microprocessors available from Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif., although other systems (including PCs having other microprocessors, engineering workstations, set-top boxes and the like) may also be used. In one embodiment, sample system 100 may execute a version of the WINDOWS' operating system available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., although other operating systems (UNIX and Linux for example), embedded software, and/or graphical user interfaces, may also be used. Thus, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
Embodiments are not limited to computer systems. Embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in other devices such as handheld devices and embedded applications. Some examples of handheld devices include cellular phones, Internet Protocol devices, digital cameras, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and handheld PCs. Embedded applications may include a micro controller, a digital signal processor (DSP), system on a chip, network computers (NetPC), set-top boxes, network hubs, wide area network (WAN) switches, or any other system that may perform one or more instructions in accordance with at least one embodiment.
Computer system 100 may include a processor 102 that may include one or more execution units 108 to perform an algorithm to perform at least one instruction in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. One embodiment may be described in the context of a single processor desktop or server system, but other embodiments may be included in a multiprocessor system. System 100 may be an example of a ‘hub’ system architecture. System 100 may include a processor 102 for processing data signals. Processor 102 may include a complex instruction set computer (CISC) microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, a processor implementing a combination of instruction sets, or any other processor device, such as a digital signal processor, for example. In one embodiment, processor 102 may be coupled to a processor bus 110 that may transmit data signals between processor 102 and other components in system 100. The elements of system 100 may perform conventional functions that are well known to those familiar with the art.
In one embodiment, processor 102 may include a Level 1 (L1) internal cache memory 104. Depending on the architecture, the processor 102 may have a single internal cache or multiple levels of internal cache. In another embodiment, the cache memory may reside external to processor 102. Other embodiments may also include a combination of both internal and external caches depending on the particular implementation and needs. Register file 106 may store different types of data in various registers including integer registers, floating point registers, status registers, and instruction pointer register.
Execution unit 108, including logic to perform integer and floating point operations, also resides in processor 102. Processor 102 may also include a microcode (ucode) ROM that stores microcode for certain macroinstructions. In one embodiment, execution unit 108 may include logic to handle a packed instruction set 109. By including the packed instruction set 109 in the instruction set of a general-purpose processor 102, along with associated circuitry to execute the instructions, the operations used by many multimedia applications may be performed using packed data in a general-purpose processor 102. Thus, many multimedia applications may be accelerated and executed more efficiently by using the full width of a processor's data bus for performing operations on packed data. This may eliminate the need to transfer smaller units of data across the processor's data bus to perform one or more operations one data element at a time.
Embodiments of an execution unit 108 may also be used in micro controllers, embedded processors, graphics devices, DSPs, and other types of logic circuits. System 100 may include a memory 120. Memory 120 may be implemented as a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) device, a static random access memory (SRAM) device, flash memory device, or other memory device. Memory 120 may store instructions and/or data represented by data signals that may be executed by processor 102.
A system logic chip 116 may be coupled to processor bus 110 and memory 120. System logic chip 116 may include a memory controller hub (MCH). Processor 102 may communicate with MCH 116 via a processor bus 110. MCH 116 may provide a high bandwidth memory path 118 to memory 120 for instruction and data storage and for storage of graphics commands, data and textures. MCH 116 may direct data signals between processor 102, memory 120, and other components in system 100 and to bridge the data signals between processor bus 110, memory 120, and system I/O 122. In some embodiments, the system logic chip 116 may provide a graphics port for coupling to a graphics controller 112. MCH 116 may be coupled to memory 120 through a memory interface 118. Graphics card 112 may be coupled to MCH 116 through an Accelerated Graphics Port (AGP) interconnect 114.
System 100 may use a proprietary hub interface bus 122 to couple MCH 116 to I/O controller hub (ICH) 130. In one embodiment, ICH 130 may provide direct connections to some I/O devices via a local I/O bus. The local I/O bus may include a high-speed I/O bus for connecting peripherals to memory 120, chipset, and processor 102. Examples may include the audio controller, firmware hub (flash BIOS) 128, wireless transceiver 126, data storage 124, legacy I/O controller containing user input and keyboard interfaces, a serial expansion port such as Universal Serial Bus (USB), and a network controller 134. Data storage device 124 may comprise a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD-ROM device, a flash memory device, or other mass storage device.
For another embodiment of a system, an instruction in accordance with one embodiment may be used with a system on a chip. One embodiment of a system on a chip comprises of a processor and a memory. The memory for one such system may include a flash memory. The flash memory may be located on the same die as the processor and other system components. Additionally, other logic blocks such as a memory controller or graphics controller may also be located on a system on a chip.
FIG. 1B illustrates a data processing system 140 which implements the principles of embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be readily appreciated by one of skill in the art that the embodiments described herein may operate with alternative processing systems without departure from the scope of embodiments of the disclosure.
Computer system 140 comprises a processing core 159 for performing at least one instruction in accordance with one embodiment. In one embodiment, processing core 159 represents a processing unit of any type of architecture, including but not limited to a CISC, a RISC or a VLIW type architecture. Processing core 159 may also be suitable for manufacture in one or more process technologies and by being represented on a machine-readable media in sufficient detail, may be suitable to facilitate said manufacture.
Processing core 159 comprises an execution unit 142, a set of register files 145, and a decoder 144. Processing core 159 may also include additional circuitry (not shown) which may be unnecessary to the understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. Execution unit 142 may execute instructions received by processing core 159. In addition to performing typical processor instructions, execution unit 142 may perform instructions in packed instruction set 143 for performing operations on packed data formats. Packed instruction set 143 may include instructions for performing embodiments of the disclosure and other packed instructions. Execution unit 142 may be coupled to register file 145 by an internal bus. Register file 145 may represent a storage area on processing core 159 for storing information, including data. As previously mentioned, it is understood that the storage area may store the packed data might not be critical. Execution unit 142 may be coupled to decoder 144. Decoder 144 may decode instructions received by processing core 159 into control signals and/or microcode entry points. In response to these control signals and/or microcode entry points, execution unit 142 performs the appropriate operations. In one embodiment, the decoder may interpret the opcode of the instruction, which will indicate what operation should be performed on the corresponding data indicated within the instruction.
Processing core 159 may be coupled with bus 141 for communicating with various other system devices, which may include but are not limited to, for example, synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) control 146, static random access memory (SRAM) control 147, burst flash memory interface 148, personal computer memory card international association (PCMCIA)/compact flash (CF) card control 149, liquid crystal display (LCD) control 150, direct memory access (DMA) controller 151, and alternative bus master interface 152. In one embodiment, data processing system 140 may also comprise an I/O bridge 154 for communicating with various I/O devices via an I/O bus 153. Such I/O devices may include but are not limited to, for example, universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART) 155, universal serial bus (USB) 156, Bluetooth wireless UART 157 and I/O expansion interface 158.
One embodiment of data processing system 140 provides for mobile, network and/or wireless communications and a processing core 159 that may perform SIMD operations including a text string comparison operation. Processing core 159 may be programmed with various audio, video, imaging and communications algorithms including discrete transformations such as a Walsh-Hadamard transform, a fast Fourier transform (FFT), a discrete cosine transform (DCT), and their respective inverse transforms; compression/decompression techniques such as color space transformation, video encode motion estimation or video decode motion compensation; and modulation/demodulation (MODEM) functions such as pulse coded modulation (PCM).
FIG. 1C illustrates other embodiments of a data processing system that performs SIMD text string comparison operations. In one embodiment, data processing system 160 may include a main processor 166, a SIMD coprocessor 161, a cache memory 167, and an input/output system 168. Input/output system 168 may optionally be coupled to a wireless interface 169. SIMD coprocessor 161 may perform operations including instructions in accordance with one embodiment. In one embodiment, processing core 170 may be suitable for manufacture in one or more process technologies and by being represented on a machine-readable media in sufficient detail, may be suitable to facilitate the manufacture of all or part of data processing system 160 including processing core 170.
In one embodiment, SIMD coprocessor 161 comprises an execution unit 162 and a set of register files 164. One embodiment of main processor 165 comprises a decoder 165 to recognize instructions of instruction set 163 including instructions in accordance with one embodiment for execution by execution unit 162. In other embodiments, SIMD coprocessor 161 also comprises at least part of decoder 165 to decode instructions of instruction set 163. Processing core 170 may also include additional circuitry (not shown) which may be unnecessary to the understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure.
In operation, main processor 166 executes a stream of data processing instructions that control data processing operations of a general type including interactions with cache memory 167, and input/output system 168. Embedded within the stream of data processing instructions may be SIMD coprocessor instructions. Decoder 165 of main processor 166 recognizes these SIMD coprocessor instructions as being of a type that should be executed by an attached SIMD coprocessor 161. Accordingly, main processor 166 issues these SIMD coprocessor instructions (or control signals representing SIMD coprocessor instructions) on the coprocessor bus 166. From coprocessor bus 166, these instructions may be received by any attached SIMD coprocessors. In this case, SIMD coprocessor 161 may accept and execute any received SIMD coprocessor instructions intended for it.
Data may be received via wireless interface 169 for processing by the SIMD coprocessor instructions. For one example, voice communication may be received in the form of a digital signal, which may be processed by the SIMD coprocessor instructions to regenerate digital audio samples representative of the voice communications. For another example, compressed audio and/or video may be received in the form of a digital bit stream, which may be processed by the SIMD coprocessor instructions to regenerate digital audio samples and/or motion video frames. In one embodiment of processing core 170, main processor 166, and a SIMD coprocessor 161 may be integrated into a single processing core 170 comprising an execution unit 162, a set of register files 164, and a decoder 165 to recognize instructions of instruction set 163 including instructions in accordance with one embodiment.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the micro-architecture for a processor 200 that may include logic circuits to perform instructions, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, an instruction in accordance with one embodiment may be implemented to operate on data elements having sizes of byte, word, doubleword, quadword, etc., as well as datatypes, such as single and double precision integer and floating point datatypes. In one embodiment, in-order front end 201 may implement a part of processor 200 that may fetch instructions to be executed and prepares the instructions to be used later in the processor pipeline. Front end 201 may include several units. In one embodiment, instruction prefetcher 226 fetches instructions from memory and feeds the instructions to an instruction decoder 228 which in turn decodes or interprets the instructions. For example, in one embodiment, the decoder decodes a received instruction into one or more operations called “micro-instructions” or “micro-operations” (also called micro op or uops) that the machine may execute. In other embodiments, the decoder parses the instruction into an opcode and corresponding data and control fields that may be used by the micro-architecture to perform operations in accordance with one embodiment. In one embodiment, trace cache 230 may assemble decoded uops into program ordered sequences or traces in uop queue 234 for execution. When trace cache 230 encounters a complex instruction, microcode ROM 232 provides the uops needed to complete the operation.
Some instructions may be converted into a single micro-op, whereas others need several micro-ops to complete the full operation. In one embodiment, if more than four micro-ops are needed to complete an instruction, decoder 228 may access microcode ROM 232 to perform the instruction. In one embodiment, an instruction may be decoded into a small number of micro ops for processing at instruction decoder 228. In another embodiment, an instruction may be stored within microcode ROM 232 should a number of micro-ops be needed to accomplish the operation. Trace cache 230 refers to an entry point programmable logic array (PLA) to determine a correct micro-instruction pointer for reading the micro-code sequences to complete one or more instructions in accordance with one embodiment from micro-code ROM 232. After microcode ROM 232 finishes sequencing micro-ops for an instruction, front end 201 of the machine may resume fetching micro-ops from trace cache 230.
Out-of-order execution engine 203 may prepare instructions for execution. The out-of-order execution logic has a number of buffers to smooth out and re-order the flow of instructions to optimize performance as they go down the pipeline and get scheduled for execution. The allocator logic allocates the machine buffers and resources that each uop needs in order to execute. The register renaming logic renames logic registers onto entries in a register file. The allocator also allocates an entry for each uop in one of the two uop queues, one for memory operations and one for non-memory operations, in front of the instruction schedulers: memory scheduler, fast scheduler 202, slow/general floating point scheduler 204, and simple floating point scheduler 206. Uop schedulers 202, 204, 206, determine when a uop is ready to execute based on the readiness of their dependent input register operand sources and the availability of the execution resources the uops need to complete their operation. Fast scheduler 202 of one embodiment may schedule on each half of the main clock cycle while the other schedulers may only schedule once per main processor clock cycle. The schedulers arbitrate for the dispatch ports to schedule uops for execution.
Register files 208, 210 may be arranged between schedulers 202, 204, 206, and execution units 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224 in execution block 211. Each of register files 208, 210 perform integer and floating point operations, respectively. Each register file 208, 210, may include a bypass network that may bypass or forward just completed results that have not yet been written into the register file to new dependent uops. Integer register file 208 and floating point register file 210 may communicate data with the other. In one embodiment, integer register file 208 may be split into two separate register files, one register file for low-order thirty-two bits of data and a second register file for high order thirty-two bits of data. Floating point register file 210 may include 128-bit wide entries because floating point instructions typically have operands from 64 to 128 bits in width.
Execution block 211 may contain execution units 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224. Execution units 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224 may execute the instructions. Execution block 211 may include register files 208, 210 that store the integer and floating point data operand values that the micro-instructions need to execute. In one embodiment, processor 200 may comprise a number of execution units: address generation unit (AGU) 212, AGU 214, fast ALU 216, fast ALU 218, slow ALU 220, floating point ALU 222, floating point move unit 224. In another embodiment, floating point execution blocks 222, 224, may execute floating point, MMX, SIMD, and SSE, or other operations. In yet another embodiment, floating point ALU 222 may include a 64-bit by 64-bit floating point divider to execute divide, square root, and remainder micro-ops. In various embodiments, instructions involving a floating point value may be handled with the floating point hardware. In one embodiment, ALU operations may be passed to high-speed ALU execution units 216, 218. High-speed ALUs 216, 218 may execute fast operations with an effective latency of half a clock cycle. In one embodiment, most complex integer operations go to slow ALU 220 as slow ALU 220 may include integer execution hardware for long latency type of operations, such as a multiplier, shifts, flag logic, and branch processing. Memory load/store operations may be executed by AGUs 212, 214. In one embodiment, integer ALUs 216, 218, 220 may perform integer operations on 64-bit data operands. In other embodiments, ALUs 216, 218, 220 may be implemented to support a variety of data bit sizes including sixteen, thirty-two, 128, 256, etc. Similarly, floating point units 222, 224 may be implemented to support a range of operands having bits of various widths. In one embodiment, floating point units 222, 224, may operate on 128-bit wide packed data operands in conjunction with SIMD and multimedia instructions.
In one embodiment, uops schedulers 202, 204, 206, dispatch dependent operations before the parent load has finished executing. As uops may be speculatively scheduled and executed in processor 200, processor 200 may also include logic to handle memory misses. If a data load misses in the data cache, there may be dependent operations in flight in the pipeline that have left the scheduler with temporarily incorrect data. A replay mechanism tracks and re-executes instructions that use incorrect data. Only the dependent operations might need to be replayed and the independent ones may be allowed to complete. The schedulers and replay mechanism of one embodiment of a processor may also be designed to catch instruction sequences for text string comparison operations.
The term “registers” may refer to the on-board processor storage locations that may be used as part of instructions to identify operands. In other words, registers may be those that may be usable from the outside of the processor (from a programmer's perspective). However, in some embodiments registers might not be limited to a particular type of circuit. Rather, a register may store data, provide data, and perform the functions described herein. The registers described herein may be implemented by circuitry within a processor using any number of different techniques, such as dedicated physical registers, dynamically allocated physical registers using register renaming, combinations of dedicated and dynamically allocated physical registers, etc. In one embodiment, integer registers store 32-bit integer data. A register file of one embodiment also contains eight multimedia SIMD registers for packed data. For the discussions below, the registers may be understood to be data registers designed to hold packed data, such as 64-bit wide MA/IX′ registers (also referred to as ‘mm’ registers in some instances) in microprocessors enabled with MMX technology from Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif. These MMX registers, available in both integer and floating point forms, may operate with packed data elements that accompany SIMD and SSE instructions. Similarly, 128-bit wide XMM registers relating to SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, or beyond (referred to generically as “SSEx”) technology may hold such packed data operands. In one embodiment, in storing packed data and integer data, the registers do not need to differentiate between the two data types. In one embodiment, integer and floating point may be contained in the same register file or different register files. Furthermore, in one embodiment, floating point and integer data may be stored in different registers or the same registers.
In the examples of the following figures, a number of data operands may be described. FIG. 3A illustrates various packed data type representations in multimedia registers, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 3A illustrates data types for a packed byte 310, a packed word 320, and a packed doubleword (dword) 330 for 128-bit wide operands. Packed byte format 310 of this example may be 128 bits long and contains sixteen packed byte data elements. A byte may be defined, for example, as eight bits of data. Information for each byte data element may be stored in bit 7 through bit 0 for byte 0, bit 15 through bit 8 for byte 1, bit 23 through bit 16 for byte 2, and finally bit 120 through bit 127 for byte 15. Thus, all available bits may be used in the register. This storage arrangement increases the storage efficiency of the processor. As well, with sixteen data elements accessed, one operation may now be performed on sixteen data elements in parallel.
Generally, a data element may include an individual piece of data that is stored in a single register or memory location with other data elements of the same length. In packed data sequences relating to SSEx technology, the number of data elements stored in a XMM register may be 128 bits divided by the length in bits of an individual data element. Similarly, in packed data sequences relating to MMX and SSE technology, the number of data elements stored in an MMX register may be 64 bits divided by the length in bits of an individual data element. Although the data types illustrated in FIG. 3A may be 128 bits long, embodiments of the present disclosure may also operate with 64-bit wide or other sized operands. Packed word format 320 of this example may be 128 bits long and contains eight packed word data elements. Each packed word contains sixteen bits of information. Packed doubleword format 330 of FIG. 3A may be 128 bits long and contains four packed doubleword data elements. Each packed doubleword data element contains thirty-two bits of information. A packed quadword may be 128 bits long and contain two packed quad-word data elements.
FIG. 3B illustrates possible in-register data storage formats, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Each packed data may include more than one independent data element. Three packed data formats are illustrated; packed half 341, packed single 342, and packed double 343. One embodiment of packed half 341, packed single 342, and packed double 343 contain fixed-point data elements. For another embodiment one or more of packed half 341, packed single 342, and packed double 343 may contain floating-point data elements. One embodiment of packed half 341 may be 128 bits long containing eight 16-bit data elements. One embodiment of packed single 342 may be 128 bits long and contains four 32-bit data elements. One embodiment of packed double 343 may be 128 bits long and contains two 64-bit data elements. It will be appreciated that such packed data formats may be further extended to other register lengths, for example, to 96-bits, 160-bits, 192-bits, 224-bits, 256-bits or more.
FIG. 3C illustrates various signed and unsigned packed data type representations in multimedia registers, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Unsigned packed byte representation 344 illustrates the storage of an unsigned packed byte in a SIMD register. Information for each byte data element may be stored in bit 7 through bit 0 for byte 0, bit 15 through bit 8 for byte 1, bit 23 through bit 16 for byte 2, and finally bit 120 through bit 127 for byte 15. Thus, all available bits may be used in the register. This storage arrangement may increase the storage efficiency of the processor. As well, with sixteen data elements accessed, one operation may now be performed on sixteen data elements in a parallel fashion. Signed packed byte representation 345 illustrates the storage of a signed packed byte. Note that the eighth bit of every byte data element may be the sign indicator. Unsigned packed word representation 346 illustrates how word seven through word zero may be stored in a SIMD register. Signed packed word representation 347 may be similar to the unsigned packed word in-register representation 346. Note that the sixteenth bit of each word data element may be the sign indicator. Unsigned packed doubleword representation 348 shows how doubleword data elements are stored. Signed packed doubleword representation 349 may be similar to unsigned packed doubleword in-register representation 348. Note that the necessary sign bit may be the thirty-second bit of each doubleword data element.
FIG. 3D illustrates an embodiment of an operation encoding (opcode). Furthermore, format 360 may include register/memory operand addressing modes corresponding with a type of opcode format described in the “IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual Volume 2: Instruction Set Reference,” which is available from Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif. on the world-wide-web (www) at intel.com/design/litcentr. In one embodiment, and instruction may be encoded by one or more of fields 361 and 362. Up to two operand locations per instruction may be identified, including up to two source operand identifiers 364 and 365. In one embodiment, destination operand identifier 366 may be the same as source operand identifier 364, whereas in other embodiments they may be different. In another embodiment, destination operand identifier 366 may be the same as source operand identifier 365, whereas in other embodiments they may be different. In one embodiment, one of the source operands identified by source operand identifiers 364 and 365 may be overwritten by the results of the text string comparison operations, whereas in other embodiments identifier 364 corresponds to a source register element and identifier 365 corresponds to a destination register element. In one embodiment, operand identifiers 364 and 365 may identify 32-bit or 64-bit source and destination operands.
FIG. 3E illustrates another possible operation encoding (opcode) format 370, having forty or more bits, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Opcode format 370 corresponds with opcode format 360 and comprises an optional prefix byte 378. An instruction according to one embodiment may be encoded by one or more of fields 378, 371, and 372. Up to two operand locations per instruction may be identified by source operand identifiers 374 and 375 and by prefix byte 378. In one embodiment, prefix byte 378 may be used to identify 32-bit or 64-bit source and destination operands. In one embodiment, destination operand identifier 376 may be the same as source operand identifier 374, whereas in other embodiments they may be different. For another embodiment, destination operand identifier 376 may be the same as source operand identifier 375, whereas in other embodiments they may be different. In one embodiment, an instruction operates on one or more of the operands identified by operand identifiers 374 and 375 and one or more operands identified by operand identifiers 374 and 375 may be overwritten by the results of the instruction, whereas in other embodiments, operands identified by identifiers 374 and 375 may be written to another data element in another register. Opcode formats 360 and 370 allow register to register, memory to register, register by memory, register by register, register by immediate, register to memory addressing specified in part by MOD fields 363 and 373 and by optional scale-index-base and displacement bytes.
FIG. 3F illustrates yet another possible operation encoding (opcode) format, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. 64-bit single instruction multiple data (SIMD) arithmetic operations may be performed through a coprocessor data processing (CDP) instruction. Operation encoding (opcode) format 380 depicts one such CDP instruction having CDP opcode fields 382-389. The type of CDP instruction, for another embodiment, operations may be encoded by one or more of fields 383, 384, 387, and 388. Up to three operand locations per instruction may be identified, including up to two source operand identifiers 385 and 390 and one destination operand identifier 386. One embodiment of the coprocessor may operate on eight, sixteen, thirty-two, and 64-bit values. In one embodiment, an instruction may be performed on integer data elements. In some embodiments, an instruction may be executed conditionally, using condition field 381. For some embodiments, source data sizes may be encoded by field 383. In some embodiments, Zero (Z), negative (N), carry (C), and overflow (V) detection may be done on SIMD fields. For some instructions, the type of saturation may be encoded by field 384.
FIG. 4A is a block diagram illustrating an in-order pipeline and a register renaming stage, out-of-order issue/execution pipeline, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 4B is a block diagram illustrating an in-order architecture core and a register renaming logic, out-of-order issue/execution logic to be included in a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. The solid lined boxes in FIG. 4A illustrate the in-order pipeline, while the dashed lined boxes illustrates the register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution pipeline. Similarly, the solid lined boxes in FIG. 4B illustrate the in-order architecture logic, while the dashed lined boxes illustrates the register renaming logic and out-of-order issue/execution logic.
In FIG. 4A, a processor pipeline 400 may include a fetch stage 402, a length decode stage 404, a decode stage 406, an allocation stage 408, a renaming stage 410, a scheduling (also known as a dispatch or issue) stage 412, a register read/memory read stage 414, an execute stage 416, a write-back/memory-write stage 418, an exception handling stage 422, and a commit stage 424.
In FIG. 4B, arrows denote a coupling between two or more units and the direction of the arrow indicates a direction of data flow between those units. FIG. 4B shows processor core 490 including a front end unit 430 coupled to an execution engine unit 450, and both may be coupled to a memory unit 470.
Core 490 may be a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) core, a complex instruction set computing (CISC) core, a very long instruction word (VLIW) core, or a hybrid or alternative core type. In one embodiment, core 490 may be a special-purpose core, such as, for example, a network or communication core, compression engine, graphics core, or the like.
Front end unit 430 may include a branch prediction unit 432 coupled to an instruction cache unit 434. Instruction cache unit 434 may be coupled to an instruction translation lookaside buffer (TLB) 436. TLB 436 may be coupled to an instruction fetch unit 438, which is coupled to a decode unit 440. Decode unit 440 may decode instructions, and generate as an output one or more micro-operations, micro-code entry points, microinstructions, other instructions, or other control signals, which may be decoded from, or which otherwise reflect, or may be derived from, the original instructions. The decoder may be implemented using various different mechanisms. Examples of suitable mechanisms include, but are not limited to, look-up tables, hardware implementations, programmable logic arrays (PLAs), microcode read-only memories (ROMs), etc. In one embodiment, instruction cache unit 434 may be further coupled to a level 2 (L2) cache unit 476 in memory unit 470. Decode unit 440 may be coupled to a rename/allocator unit 452 in execution engine unit 450.
Execution engine unit 450 may include rename/allocator unit 452 coupled to a retirement unit 454 and a set of one or more scheduler units 456. Scheduler units 456 represent any number of different schedulers, including reservations stations, central instruction window, etc. Scheduler units 456 may be coupled to physical register file units 458. Each of physical register file units 458 represents one or more physical register files, different ones of which store one or more different data types, such as scalar integer, scalar floating point, packed integer, packed floating point, vector integer, vector floating point, etc., status (e.g., an instruction pointer that is the address of the next instruction to be executed), etc. Physical register file units 458 may be overlapped by retirement unit 154 to illustrate various ways in which register renaming and out-of-order execution may be implemented (e.g., using one or more reorder buffers and one or more retirement register files, using one or more future files, one or more history buffers, and one or more retirement register files; using register maps and a pool of registers; etc.). Generally, the architectural registers may be visible from the outside of the processor or from a programmer's perspective. The registers might not be limited to any known particular type of circuit. Various different types of registers may be suitable as long as they store and provide data as described herein. Examples of suitable registers include, but might not be limited to, dedicated physical registers, dynamically allocated physical registers using register renaming, combinations of dedicated and dynamically allocated physical registers, etc. Retirement unit 454 and physical register file units 458 may be coupled to execution clusters 460. Execution clusters 460 may include a set of one or more execution units 162 and a set of one or more memory access units 464. Execution units 462 may perform various operations (e.g., shifts, addition, subtraction, multiplication) and on various types of data (e.g., scalar floating point, packed integer, packed floating point, vector integer, vector floating point). While some embodiments may include a number of execution units dedicated to specific functions or sets of functions, other embodiments may include only one execution unit or multiple execution units that all perform all functions. Scheduler units 456, physical register file units 458, and execution clusters 460 are shown as being possibly plural because certain embodiments create separate pipelines for certain types of data/operations (e.g., a scalar integer pipeline, a scalar floating point/packed integer/packed floating point/vector integer/vector floating point pipeline, and/or a memory access pipeline that each have their own scheduler unit, physical register file unit, and/or execution cluster—and in the case of a separate memory access pipeline, certain embodiments may be implemented in which only the execution cluster of this pipeline has memory access units 464). It should also be understood that where separate pipelines are used, one or more of these pipelines may be out-of-order issue/execution and the rest in-order.
The set of memory access units 464 may be coupled to memory unit 470, which may include a data TLB unit 472 coupled to a data cache unit 474 coupled to a level 2 (L2) cache unit 476. In one exemplary embodiment, memory access units 464 may include a load unit, a store address unit, and a store data unit, each of which may be coupled to data TLB unit 472 in memory unit 470. L2 cache unit 476 may be coupled to one or more other levels of cache and eventually to a main memory.
By way of example, the exemplary register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution core architecture may implement pipeline 400 as follows: 1) instruction fetch 438 may perform fetch and length decoding stages 402 and 404; 2) decode unit 440 may perform decode stage 406; 3) rename/allocator unit 452 may perform allocation stage 408 and renaming stage 410; 4) scheduler units 456 may perform schedule stage 412; 5) physical register file units 458 and memory unit 470 may perform register read/memory read stage 414; execution cluster 460 may perform execute stage 416; 6) memory unit 470 and physical register file units 458 may perform write-back/memory-write stage 418; 7) various units may be involved in the performance of exception handling stage 422; and 8) retirement unit 454 and physical register file units 458 may perform commit stage 424.
Core 490 may support one or more instructions sets (e.g., the x86 instruction set (with some extensions that have been added with newer versions); the MIPS instruction set of MIPS Technologies of Sunnyvale, Calif.; the ARM instruction set (with optional additional extensions such as NEON) of ARM Holdings of Sunnyvale, Calif.).
It should be understood that the core may support multithreading (executing two or more parallel sets of operations or threads) in a variety of manners. Multithreading support may be performed by, for example, including time sliced multithreading, simultaneous multithreading (where a single physical core provides a logical core for each of the threads that physical core is simultaneously multithreading), or a combination thereof. Such a combination may include, for example, time sliced fetching and decoding and simultaneous multithreading thereafter such as in the Intel® Hyperthreading technology.
While register renaming may be described in the context of out-of-order execution, it should be understood that register renaming may be used in an in-order architecture. While the illustrated embodiment of the processor may also include a separate instruction and data cache units 434/474 and a shared L2 cache unit 476, other embodiments may have a single internal cache for both instructions and data, such as, for example, a Level 1 (L1) internal cache, or multiple levels of internal cache. In some embodiments, the system may include a combination of an internal cache and an external cache that may be external to the core and/or the processor. In other embodiments, all of the cache may be external to the core and/or the processor.
FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a processor 500, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, processor 500 may include a multicore processor. Processor 500 may include a system agent 510 communicatively coupled to one or more cores 502. Furthermore, cores 502 and system agent 510 may be communicatively coupled to one or more caches 506. Cores 502, system agent 510, and caches 506 may be communicatively coupled via one or more memory control units 552. Furthermore, cores 502, system agent 510, and caches 506 may be communicatively coupled to a graphics module 560 via memory control units 552.
Processor 500 may include any suitable mechanism for interconnecting cores 502, system agent 510, and caches 506, and graphics module 560. In one embodiment, processor 500 may include a ring-based interconnect unit 508 to interconnect cores 502, system agent 510, and caches 506, and graphics module 560. In other embodiments, processor 500 may include any number of well-known techniques for interconnecting such units. Ring-based interconnect unit 508 may utilize memory control units 552 to facilitate interconnections.
Processor 500 may include a memory hierarchy comprising one or more levels of caches within the cores, one or more shared cache units such as caches 506, or external memory (not shown) coupled to the set of integrated memory controller units 552. Caches 506 may include any suitable cache. In one embodiment, caches 506 may include one or more mid-level caches, such as level 2 (L2), level 3 (L3), level 4 (L4), or other levels of cache, a last level cache (LLC), and/or combinations thereof.
In various embodiments, one or more of cores 502 may perform multithreading. System agent 510 may include components for coordinating and operating cores 502. System agent unit 510 may include for example a power control unit (PCU). The PCU may be or include logic and components needed for regulating the power state of cores 502. System agent 510 may include a display engine 512 for driving one or more externally connected displays or graphics module 560. System agent 510 may include an interface 1214 for communications busses for graphics. In one embodiment, interface 1214 may be implemented by PCI Express (PCIe). In a further embodiment, interface 1214 may be implemented by PCI Express Graphics (PEG). System agent 510 may include a direct media interface (DMI) 516. DMI 516 may provide links between different bridges on a motherboard or other portion of a computer system. System agent 510 may include a PCIe bridge 1218 for providing PCIe links to other elements of a computing system. PCIe bridge 1218 may be implemented using a memory controller 1220 and coherence logic 1222.
Cores 502 may be implemented in any suitable manner. Cores 502 may be homogenous or heterogeneous in terms of architecture and/or instruction set. In one embodiment, some of cores 502 may be in-order while others may be out-of-order. In another embodiment, two or more of cores 502 may execute the same instruction set, while others may execute only a subset of that instruction set or a different instruction set.
Processor 500 may include a general-purpose processor, such as a CoreTM i3, i5, i7, 2 Duo and Quad, XeonTM, ItaniumTM, XScaleTM or StrongARIVlTM processor, which may be available from Intel Corporation, of Santa Clara, Calif. Processor 500 may be provided from another company, such as ARM Holdings, Ltd, MIPS, etc. Processor 500 may be a special-purpose processor, such as, for example, a network or communication processor, compression engine, graphics processor, co-processor, embedded processor, or the like. Processor 500 may be implemented on one or more chips. Processor 500 may be a part of and/or may be implemented on one or more substrates using any of a number of process technologies, such as, for example, BiCMOS, CMOS, or NMOS.
In one embodiment, a given one of caches 506 may be shared by multiple ones of cores 502. In another embodiment, a given one of caches 506 may be dedicated to one of cores 502. The assignment of caches 506 to cores 502 may be handled by a cache controller or other suitable mechanism. A given one of caches 506 may be shared by two or more cores 502 by implementing time-slices of a given cache 506.
Graphics module 560 may implement an integrated graphics processing subsystem. In one embodiment, graphics module 560 may include a graphics processor. Furthermore, graphics module 560 may include a media engine 565. Media engine 565 may provide media encoding and video decoding.
FIG. 5B is a block diagram of an example implementation of a core 502, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Core 502 may include a front end 570 communicatively coupled to an out-of-order engine 580. Core 502 may be communicatively coupled to other portions of processor 500 through cache hierarchy 503.
Front end 570 may be implemented in any suitable manner, such as fully or in part by front end 201 as described above. In one embodiment, front end 570 may communicate with other portions of processor 500 through cache hierarchy 503. In a further embodiment, front end 570 may fetch instructions from portions of processor 500 and prepare the instructions to be used later in the processor pipeline as they are passed to out-of-order execution engine 580.
Out-of-order execution engine 580 may be implemented in any suitable manner, such as fully or in part by out-of-order execution engine 203 as described above. Out-of-order execution engine 580 may prepare instructions received from front end 570 for execution. Out-of-order execution engine 580 may include an allocate module 1282. In one embodiment, allocate module 1282 may allocate resources of processor 500 or other resources, such as registers or buffers, to execute a given instruction. Allocate module 1282 may make allocations in schedulers, such as a memory scheduler, fast scheduler, or floating point scheduler. Such schedulers may be represented in FIG. 5B by resource schedulers 584. Allocate module 1282 may be implemented fully or in part by the allocation logic described in conjunction with FIG. 2. Resource schedulers 584 may determine when an instruction is ready to execute based on the readiness of a given resource's sources and the availability of execution resources needed to execute an instruction. Resource schedulers 584 may be implemented by, for example, schedulers 202, 204, 206 as discussed above. Resource schedulers 584 may schedule the execution of instructions upon one or more resources. In one embodiment, such resources may be internal to core 502, and may be illustrated, for example, as resources 586. In another embodiment, such resources may be external to core 502 and may be accessible by, for example, cache hierarchy 503. Resources may include, for example, memory, caches, register files, or registers. Resources internal to core 502 may be represented by resources 586 in FIG. 5B. As necessary, values written to or read from resources 586 may be coordinated with other portions of processor 500 through, for example, cache hierarchy 503. As instructions are assigned resources, they may be placed into a reorder buffer 588. Reorder buffer 588 may track instructions as they are executed and may selectively reorder their execution based upon any suitable criteria of processor 500. In one embodiment, reorder buffer 588 may identify instructions or a series of instructions that may be executed independently. Such instructions or a series of instructions may be executed in parallel from other such instructions. Parallel execution in core 502 may be performed by any suitable number of separate execution blocks or virtual processors. In one embodiment, shared resources—such as memory, registers, and caches—may be accessible to multiple virtual processors within a given core 502. In other embodiments, shared resources may be accessible to multiple processing entities within processor 500.
Cache hierarchy 503 may be implemented in any suitable manner. For example, cache hierarchy 503 may include one or more lower or mid-level caches, such as caches 572, 574. In one embodiment, cache hierarchy 503 may include an LLC 595 communicatively coupled to caches 572, 574. In another embodiment, LLC 595 may be implemented in a module 590 accessible to all processing entities of processor 500. In a further embodiment, module 590 may be implemented in an uncore module of processors from Intel, Inc. Module 590 may include portions or subsystems of processor 500 necessary for the execution of core 502 but might not be implemented within core 502. Besides LLC 595, Module 590 may include, for example, hardware interfaces, memory coherency coordinators, interprocessor interconnects, instruction pipelines, or memory controllers. Access to RAM 599 available to processor 500 may be made through module 590 and, more specifically, LLC 595. Furthermore, other instances of core 502 may similarly access module 590. Coordination of the instances of core 502 may be facilitated in part through module 590.
FIGS. 6-8 may illustrate exemplary systems suitable for including processor 500, while FIG. 9 may illustrate an exemplary system on a chip (SoC) that may include one or more of cores 502. Other system designs and implementations known in the arts for laptops, desktops, handheld PCs, personal digital assistants, engineering workstations, servers, network devices, network hubs, switches, embedded processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), graphics devices, video game devices, set-top boxes, micro controllers, cell phones, portable media players, hand held devices, and various other electronic devices, may also be suitable. In general, a huge variety of systems or electronic devices that incorporate a processor and/or other execution logic as disclosed herein may be generally suitable.
FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of a system 600, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. System 600 may include one or more processors 610, 615, which may be coupled to graphics memory controller hub (GMCH) 620. The optional nature of additional processors 615 is denoted in FIG. 6 with broken lines.
Each processor 610,615 may be some version of processor 500. However, it should be noted that integrated graphics logic and integrated memory control units might not exist in processors 610,615. FIG. 6 illustrates that GMCH 620 may be coupled to a memory 640 that may be, for example, a dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The DRAM may, for at least one embodiment, be associated with a non-volatile cache.
GMCH 620 may be a chipset, or a portion of a chipset. GMCH 620 may communicate with processors 610, 615 and control interaction between processors 610, 615 and memory 640. GMCH 620 may also act as an accelerated bus interface between the processors 610, 615 and other elements of system 600. In one embodiment, GMCH 620 communicates with processors 610, 615 via a multi-drop bus, such as a frontside bus (FSB) 695.
Furthermore, GMCH 620 may be coupled to a display 645 (such as a flat panel display). In one embodiment, GMCH 620 may include an integrated graphics accelerator. GMCH 620 may be further coupled to an input/output (I/O) controller hub (ICH) 650, which may be used to couple various peripheral devices to system 600. External graphics device 660 may include be a discrete graphics device coupled to ICH 650 along with another peripheral device 670.
In other embodiments, additional or different processors may also be present in system 600. For example, additional processors 610, 615 may include additional processors that may be the same as processor 610, additional processors that may be heterogeneous or asymmetric to processor 610, accelerators (such as, e.g., graphics accelerators or digital signal processing (DSP) units), field programmable gate arrays, or any other processor. There may be a variety of differences between the physical resources 610, 615 in terms of a spectrum of metrics of merit including architectural, micro-architectural, thermal, power consumption characteristics, and the like. These differences may effectively manifest themselves as asymmetry and heterogeneity amongst processors 610, 615. For at least one embodiment, various processors 610, 615 may reside in the same die package.
FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of a second system 700, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 7, multiprocessor system 700 may include a point-to-point interconnect system, and may include a first processor 770 and a second processor 780 coupled via a point-to-point interconnect 750. Each of processors 770 and 780 may be some version of processor 500 as one or more of processors 610,615.
While FIG. 7 may illustrate two processors 770, 780, it is to be understood that the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited. In other embodiments, one or more additional processors may be present in a given processor.
Processors 770 and 780 are shown including integrated memory controller units 772 and 782, respectively. Processor 770 may also include as part of its bus controller units point-to-point (P-P) interfaces 776 and 778; similarly, second processor 780 may include P-P interfaces 786 and 788. Processors 770, 780 may exchange information via a point-to-point (P-P) interface 750 using P-P interface circuits 778, 788. As shown in FIG. 7, IMCs 772 and 782 may couple the processors to respective memories, namely a memory 732 and a memory 734, which in one embodiment may be portions of main memory locally attached to the respective processors.
Processors 770, 780 may each exchange information with a chipset 790 via individual P-P interfaces 752, 754 using point to point interface circuits 776, 794, 786, 798. In one embodiment, chipset 790 may also exchange information with a high-performance graphics circuit 738 via a high-performance graphics interface 739.
A shared cache (not shown) may be included in either processor or outside of both processors, yet connected with the processors via P-P interconnect, such that either or both processors' local cache information may be stored in the shared cache if a processor is placed into a low power mode.
Chipset 790 may be coupled to a first bus 716 via an interface 796. In one embodiment, first bus 716 may be a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, or a bus such as a PCI Express bus or another third generation I/O interconnect bus, although the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited.
As shown in FIG. 7, various I/O devices 714 may be coupled to first bus 716, along with a bus bridge 718 which couples first bus 716 to a second bus 720. In one embodiment, second bus 720 may be a low pin count (LPC) bus. Various devices may be coupled to second bus 720 including, for example, a keyboard and/or mouse 722, communication devices 727 and a storage unit 728 such as a disk drive or other mass storage device which may include instructions/code and data 730, in one embodiment. Further, an audio I/O 724 may be coupled to second bus 720. Note that other architectures may be possible. For example, instead of the point-to-point architecture of FIG. 7, a system may implement a multi-drop bus or other such architecture.
FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a third system 800 in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Like elements in FIGS. 7 and 8 bear like reference numerals, and certain aspects of FIG. 7 have been omitted from FIG. 8 in order to avoid obscuring other aspects of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8 illustrates that processors 870, 880 may include integrated memory and I/O control logic (“CL”) 872 and 882, respectively. For at least one embodiment, CL 872, 882 may include integrated memory controller units such as that described above in connection with FIGS. 5 and 7. In addition. CL 872, 882 may also include I/O control logic. FIG. 8 illustrates that not only memories 832, 834 may be coupled to CL 872, 882, but also that I/O devices 814 may also be coupled to control logic 872, 882. Legacy I/O devices 815 may be coupled to chipset 890.
FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of a SoC 900, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Similar elements in FIG. 5 bear like reference numerals. Also, dashed lined boxes may represent optional features on more advanced SoCs. An interconnect units 902 may be coupled to: an application processor 910 which may include a set of one or more cores 902A-N and shared cache units 906; a system agent unit 910; a bus controller units 916; an integrated memory controller units 914; a set or one or more media processors 920 which may include integrated graphics logic 908, an image processor 924 for providing still and/or video camera functionality, an audio processor 926 for providing hardware audio acceleration, and a video processor 928 for providing video encode/decode acceleration; an static random access memory (SRAM) unit 930; a direct memory access (DMA) unit 932; and a display unit 940 for coupling to one or more external displays.
FIG. 10 illustrates a processor containing a central processing unit (CPU) and a graphics processing unit (GPU), which may perform at least one instruction, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, an instruction to perform operations according to at least one embodiment could be performed by the CPU. In another embodiment, the instruction could be performed by the GPU. In still another embodiment, the instruction may be performed through a combination of operations performed by the GPU and the CPU. For example, in one embodiment, an instruction in accordance with one embodiment may be received and decoded for execution on the GPU. However, one or more operations within the decoded instruction may be performed by a CPU and the result returned to the GPU for final retirement of the instruction. Conversely, in some embodiments, the CPU may act as the primary processor and the GPU as the co-processor.
In some embodiments, instructions that benefit from highly parallel, throughput processors may be performed by the GPU, while instructions that benefit from the performance of processors that benefit from deeply pipelined architectures may be performed by the CPU. For example, graphics, scientific applications, financial applications and other parallel workloads may benefit from the performance of the GPU and be executed accordingly, whereas more sequential applications, such as operating system kernel or application code may be better suited for the CPU.
In FIG. 10, processor 1000 includes a CPU 1005, GPU 1010, image processor 1015, video processor 1020, USB controller 1025, UART controller 1030, SPI/SDIO controller 1035, display device 1040, memory interface controller 1045, MIPI controller 1050, flash memory controller 1055, dual data rate (DDR) controller 1060, security engine 1065, and I2S/I2C controller 1070. Other logic and circuits may be included in the processor of FIG. 10, including more CPUs or GPUs and other peripheral interface controllers.
One or more aspects of at least one embodiment may be implemented by representative data stored on a machine-readable medium which represents various logic within the processor, which when read by a machine causes the machine to fabricate logic to perform the techniques described herein. Such representations, known as “IP cores” may be stored on a tangible, machine-readable medium (“tape”) and supplied to various customers or manufacturing facilities to load into the fabrication machines that actually make the logic or processor. For example, IP cores, such as the CortexTM family of processors developed by ARM Holdings, Ltd. and Loongson IP cores developed the Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences may be licensed or sold to various customers or licensees, such as Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, Apple, or Samsung and implemented in processors produced by these customers or licensees.
FIG. 11 illustrates a block diagram illustrating the development of IP cores, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Storage 1130 may include simulation software 1120 and/or hardware or software model 1110. In one embodiment, the data representing the IP core design may be provided to storage 1130 via memory 1140 (e.g., hard disk), wired connection (e.g., internet) 1150 or wireless connection 1160. The IP core information generated by the simulation tool and model may then be transmitted to a fabrication facility where it may be fabricated by a 3rd party to perform at least one instruction in accordance with at least one embodiment.
In some embodiments, one or more instructions may correspond to a first type or architecture (e.g., x86) and be translated or emulated on a processor of a different type or architecture (e.g., ARM). An instruction, according to one embodiment, may therefore be performed on any processor or processor type, including ARM, x86, MIPS, a GPU, or other processor type or architecture.
FIG. 12 illustrates how an instruction of a first type may be emulated by a processor of a different type, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. In FIG. 12, program 1205 contains some instructions that may perform the same or substantially the same function as an instruction according to one embodiment. However the instructions of program 1205 may be of a type and/or format that is different from or incompatible with processor 1215, meaning the instructions of the type in program 1205 may not be able to execute natively by the processor 1215. However, with the help of emulation logic, 1210, the instructions of program 1205 may be translated into instructions that may be natively be executed by the processor 1215. In one embodiment, the emulation logic may be embodied in hardware. In another embodiment, the emulation logic may be embodied in a tangible, machine-readable medium containing software to translate instructions of the type in program 1205 into the type natively executable by processor 1215. In other embodiments, emulation logic may be a combination of fixed-function or programmable hardware and a program stored on a tangible, machine-readable medium. In one embodiment, the processor contains the emulation logic, whereas in other embodiments, the emulation logic exists outside of the processor and may be provided by a third party. In one embodiment, the processor may load the emulation logic embodied in a tangible, machine-readable medium containing software by executing microcode or firmware contained in or associated with the processor.
FIG. 13 illustrates a block diagram contrasting the use of a software instruction converter to convert binary instructions in a source instruction set to binary instructions in a target instruction set, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. In the illustrated embodiment, the instruction converter may be a software instruction converter, although the instruction converter may be implemented in software, firmware, hardware, or various combinations thereof. FIG. 13 shows a program in a high level language 1302 may be compiled using an x86 compiler 1304 to generate x86 binary code 1306 that may be natively executed by a processor with at least one x86 instruction set core 1316. The processor with at least one x86 instruction set core 1316 represents any processor that may perform substantially the same functions as an Intel processor with at least one x86 instruction set core by compatibly executing or otherwise processing (1) a substantial portion of the instruction set of the Intel x86 instruction set core or (2) object code versions of applications or other software targeted to run on an Intel processor with at least one x86 instruction set core, in order to achieve substantially the same result as an Intel processor with at least one x86 instruction set core. x86 compiler 1304 represents a compiler that may be operable to generate x86 binary code 1306 (e.g., object code) that may, with or without additional linkage processing, be executed on the processor with at least one x86 instruction set core 1316. Similarly, FIG. 13 shows the program in high level language 1302 may be compiled using an alternative instruction set compiler 1308 to generate alternative instruction set binary code 1310 that may be natively executed by a processor without at least one x86 instruction set core 1314 (e.g., a processor with cores that execute the MIPS instruction set of MIPS Technologies of Sunnyvale, Calif. and/or that execute the ARM instruction set of ARM Holdings of Sunnyvale, Calif.). Instruction converter 1312 may be used to convert x86 binary code 1306 into code that may be natively executed by the processor without an x86 instruction set core 1314. This converted code might not be the same as alternative instruction set binary code 1310; however, the converted code will accomplish the general operation and be made up of instructions from the alternative instruction set. Thus, instruction converter 1312 represents software, firmware, hardware, or a combination thereof that, through emulation, simulation or any other process, allows a processor or other electronic device that does not have an x86 instruction set processor or core to execute x86 binary code 1306.
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of an instruction set architecture 1400 of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Instruction set architecture 1400 may include any suitable number or kind of components.
For example, instruction set architecture 1400 may include processing entities such as one or more cores 1406, 1407 and a graphics processing unit 1415. Cores 1406, 1407 may be communicatively coupled to the rest of instruction set architecture 1400 through any suitable mechanism, such as through a bus or cache. In one embodiment, cores 1406, 1407 may be communicatively coupled through an L2 cache control 1408, which may include a bus interface unit 1409 and an L2 cache 1410. Cores 1406, 1407 and graphics processing unit 1415 may be communicatively coupled to each other and to the remainder of instruction set architecture 1400 through interconnect 1410. In one embodiment, graphics processing unit 1415 may use a video code 1420 defining the manner in which particular video signals will be encoded and decoded for output.
Instruction set architecture 1400 may also include any number or kind of interfaces, controllers, or other mechanisms for interfacing or communicating with other portions of an electronic device or system. Such mechanisms may facilitate interaction with, for example, peripherals, communications devices, other processors, or memory. In the example of FIG. 14, instruction set architecture 1400 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD) video interface 1425, a subscriber interface module (SIM) interface 1430, a boot ROM interface 1435, a synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) controller 1440, a flash controller 1445, and a serial peripheral interface (SPI) master unit 1450. LCD video interface 1425 may provide output of video signals from, for example, GPU 1415 and through, for example, a mobile industry processor interface (MIPI) 1490 or a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) 1495 to a display. Such a display may include, for example, an LCD. SIM interface 1430 may provide access to or from a SIM card or device. SDRAM controller 1440 may provide access to or from memory such as an SDRAM chip or module. Flash controller 1445 may provide access to or from memory such as flash memory or other instances of RAM. SPI master unit 1450 may provide access to or from communications modules, such as a Bluetooth module 1470, high-speed 3G modem 1475, global positioning system module 1480, or wireless module 1485 implementing a communications standard such as 802.11.
FIG. 15 is a more detailed block diagram of an instruction set architecture 1500 of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Instruction architecture 1500 may implement one or more aspects of instruction set architecture 1400. Furthermore, instruction set architecture 1500 may illustrate modules and mechanisms for the execution of instructions within a processor.
Instruction architecture 1500 may include a memory system 1540 communicatively coupled to one or more execution entities 1565. Furthermore, instruction architecture 1500 may include a caching and bus interface unit such as unit 1510 communicatively coupled to execution entities 1565 and memory system 1540. In one embodiment, loading of instructions into execution entities 1564 may be performed by one or more stages of execution. Such stages may include, for example, instruction prefetch stage 1530, dual instruction decode stage 1550, register rename stage 155, issue stage 1560, and writeback stage 1570.
Execution entities 1565 may include any suitable number and kind of mechanisms by which a processor may execute instructions. In the example of FIG. 15, execution entities 1565 may include ALU/multiplication units (MUL) 1566, ALUs 1567, and floating point units (FPU) 1568. In one embodiment, such entities may make use of information contained within a given address 1569. Execution entities 1565 in combination with stages 1530, 1550, 1555, 1560, 1570 may collectively form an execution unit.
Unit 1510 may be implemented in any suitable manner. In one embodiment, unit 1510 may perform cache control. In such an embodiment, unit 1510 may thus include a cache 1525. Cache 1525 may be implemented, in a further embodiment, as an L2 unified cache with any suitable size, such as zero, 128 k, 256 k, 512 k, 1M, or 2M bytes of memory. In another, further embodiment, cache 1525 may be implemented in error-correcting code memory. In another embodiment, unit 1510 may perform bus interfacing to other portions of a processor or electronic device. In such an embodiment, unit 1510 may thus include a bus interface unit 1520 for communicating over an interconnect, intraprocessor bus, interprocessor bus, or other communication bus, port, or line. Bus interface unit 1520 may provide interfacing in order to perform, for example, generation of the memory and input/output addresses for the transfer of data between execution entities 1565 and the portions of a system external to instruction architecture 1500.
To further facilitate its functions, bus interface unit 1520 may include an interrupt control and distribution unit 1511 for generating interrupts and other communications to other portions of a processor or electronic device. In one embodiment, bus interface unit 1520 may include a snoop control unit 1512 that handles cache access and coherency for multiple processing cores. In a further embodiment, to provide such functionality, snoop control unit 1512 may include a cache-to-cache transfer unit that handles information exchanges between different caches. In another, further embodiment, snoop control unit 1512 may include one or more snoop filters 1514 that monitors the coherency of other caches (not shown) so that a cache controller, such as unit 1510, does not have to perform such monitoring directly. Unit 1510 may include any suitable number of timers 1515 for synchronizing the actions of instruction architecture 1500. Also, unit 1510 may include an AC port 1516.
Memory system 1540 may include any suitable number and kind of mechanisms for storing information for the processing needs of instruction architecture 1500. In one embodiment, memory system 1504 may include a load store unit 1530 for storing information such as buffers written to or read back from memory or registers. In another embodiment, memory system 1504 may include a translation lookaside buffer (TLB) 1545 that provides look-up of address values between physical and virtual addresses. In yet another embodiment, bus interface unit 1520 may include a memory management unit (MMU) 1544 for facilitating access to virtual memory. In still yet another embodiment, memory system 1504 may include a prefetcher 1543 for requesting instructions from memory before such instructions are actually needed to be executed, in order to reduce latency.
The operation of instruction architecture 1500 to execute an instruction may be performed through different stages. For example, using unit 1510 instruction prefetch stage 1530 may access an instruction through prefetcher 1543. Instructions retrieved may be stored in instruction cache 1532. Prefetch stage 1530 may enable an option 1531 for fast-loop mode, and a series of instructions forming a loop that is small enough to fit within a given cache are executed. In one embodiment, such an execution may be performed without needing to access additional instructions from, for example, instruction cache 1532. Determination of what instructions to prefetch may be made by, for example, branch prediction unit 1535, which may access indications of execution in global history 1536, indications of target addresses 1537, or contents of a return stack 1538 to determine which of branches 1557 of code will be executed next. Such branches may be possibly prefetched as a result. Branches 1557 may be produced through other stages of operation as described below. Instruction prefetch stage 1530 may provide instructions as well as any predictions about future instructions to dual instruction decode stage.
Dual instruction decode stage 1550 may translate a received instruction into microcode-based instructions that may be executed. Dual instruction decode stage 1550 may simultaneously decode two instructions per clock cycle. Furthermore, dual instruction decode stage 1550 may pass its results to register rename stage 1555. In addition, dual instruction decode stage 1550 may determine any resulting branches from its decoding and eventual execution of the microcode. Such results may be input into branches 1557.
Register rename stage 1555 may translate references to virtual registers or other resources into references to physical registers or resources. Register rename stage 1555 may include indications of such mapping in a register pool 1556. Register rename stage 1555 may alter the instructions as received and send the result to issue stage 1560.
Issue stage 1560 may issue or dispatch commands to execution entities 1565. Such issuance may be performed in an out-of-order fashion. In one embodiment, multiple instructions may be held at issue stage 1560 before being executed. Issue stage 1560 may include an instruction queue 1561 for holding such multiple commands. Instructions may be issued by issue stage 1560 to a particular processing entity 1565 based upon any acceptable criteria, such as availability or suitability of resources for execution of a given instruction. In one embodiment, issue stage 1560 may reorder the instructions within instruction queue 1561 such that the first instructions received might not be the first instructions executed. Based upon the ordering of instruction queue 1561, additional branching information may be provided to branches 1557. Issue stage 1560 may pass instructions to executing entities 1565 for execution.
Upon execution, writeback stage 1570 may write data into registers, queues, or other structures of instruction set architecture 1500 to communicate the completion of a given command. Depending upon the order of instructions arranged in issue stage 1560, the operation of writeback stage 1570 may enable additional instructions to be executed. Performance of instruction set architecture 1500 may be monitored or debugged by trace unit 1575.
FIG. 16 is a block diagram of an execution pipeline 1600 for an instruction set architecture of a processor, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Execution pipeline 1600 may illustrate operation of, for example, instruction architecture 1500 of FIG. 15.
Execution pipeline 1600 may include any suitable combination of steps or operations. In 1605, predictions of the branch that is to be executed next may be made. In one embodiment, such predictions may be based upon previous executions of instructions and the results thereof. In 1610, instructions corresponding to the predicted branch of execution may be loaded into an instruction cache. In 1615, one or more such instructions in the instruction cache may be fetched for execution. In 1620, the instructions that have been fetched may be decoded into microcode or more specific machine language. In one embodiment, multiple instructions may be simultaneously decoded. In 1625, references to registers or other resources within the decoded instructions may be reassigned. For example, references to virtual registers may be replaced with references to corresponding physical registers. In 1630, the instructions may be dispatched to queues for execution. In 1640, the instructions may be executed. Such execution may be performed in any suitable manner. In 1650, the instructions may be issued to a suitable execution entity. The manner in which the instruction is executed may depend upon the specific entity executing the instruction. For example, at 1655, an ALU may perform arithmetic functions. The ALU may utilize a single clock cycle for its operation, as well as two shifters. In one embodiment, two ALUs may be employed, and thus two instructions may be executed at 1655. At 1660, a determination of a resulting branch may be made. A program counter may be used to designate the destination to which the branch will be made. 1660 may be executed within a single clock cycle. At 1665, floating point arithmetic may be performed by one or more FPUs. The floating point operation may require multiple clock cycles to execute, such as two to ten cycles. At 1670, multiplication and division operations may be performed. Such operations may be performed in four clock cycles. At 1675, loading and storing operations to registers or other portions of pipeline 1600 may be performed. The operations may include loading and storing addresses. Such operations may be performed in four clock cycles. At 1680, write-back operations may be performed as required by the resulting operations of 1655-1675.
FIG. 17 is a block diagram of an electronic device 1700 for utilizing a processor 1710, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Electronic device 1700 may include, for example, a notebook, an ultrabook, a computer, a tower server, a rack server, a blade server, a laptop, a desktop, a tablet, a mobile device, a phone, an embedded computer, or any other suitable electronic device.
Electronic device 1700 may include processor 1710 communicatively coupled to any suitable number or kind of components, peripherals, modules, or devices. Such coupling may be accomplished by any suitable kind of bus or interface, such as I2C bus, system management bus (SMBus), low pin count (LPC) bus, SPI, high definition audio (HDA) bus, Serial Advance Technology Attachment (SATA) bus, USB bus (versions 1, 2, 3), or Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART) bus.
Such components may include, for example, a display 1724, a touch screen 1725, a touch pad 1730, a near field communications (NFC) unit 1745, a sensor hub 1740, a thermal sensor 1746, an express chipset (EC) 1735, a trusted platform module (TPM) 1738, BIOS/firmware/flash memory 1722, a digital signal processor 1760, a drive 1720 such as a solid state disk (SSD) or a hard disk drive (HDD), a wireless local area network (WLAN) unit 1750, a Bluetooth unit 1752, a wireless wide area network (WWAN) unit 1756, a global positioning system (GPS), a camera 1754 such as a USB 3.0 camera, or a low power double data rate (LPDDR) memory unit 1715 implemented in, for example, the LPDDR3 standard. These components may each be implemented in any suitable manner.
Furthermore, in various embodiments other components may be communicatively coupled to processor 1710 through the components discussed above. For example, an accelerometer 1741, ambient light sensor (ALS) 1742, compass 1743, and gyroscope 1744 may be communicatively coupled to sensor hub 1740. A thermal sensor 1739, fan 1737, keyboard 1746, and touch pad 1730 may be communicatively coupled to EC 1735. Speaker 1763, headphones 1764, and a microphone 1765 may be communicatively coupled to an audio unit 1764, which may in turn be communicatively coupled to DSP 1760. Audio unit 1764 may include, for example, an audio codec and a class D amplifier. A SIM card 1757 may be communicatively coupled to WWAN unit 1756. Components such as WLAN unit 1750 and Bluetooth unit 1752, as well as WWAN unit 1756 may be implemented in a next generation form factor (NGFF).
Embodiments of the present disclosure involve logic for implementing a delayed authentication debug policy.
FIG. 18A illustrates an example embodiment of chassis platform 1800 for implementing a debug chassis security system 1801 including a delayed authentication debug policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown, chassis platform 1800 includes processor 1840, which may represent a processor as described above with respect to FIGS. 1-17. In certain embodiments, chassis platform 1800 may represent a system-on-chip (SoC) as described above. In certain embodiments, chassis platform 1800 may include processor 1840 and logic blocks 1844 may be omitted.
FIG. 18B illustrates an example embodiment of additional details of a debug chassis security system 1803, which may represent at least certain portions of debug chassis security system 1801 described above with respect to FIG. 18A, for implementing logic for a delayed authentication debug policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 18B may include a generalized example of at least certain portions chassis platform 1800 in which logic blocks 1842 and 1844 are generically represented by logic blocks 1808-1 to 1808-N. Accordingly, FIG. 18B may represent an implementation of debug chassis security system 1803 on a processor or on an SoC, in different embodiments.
In designing and implementing a debug chassis security architecture for a chassis platform, such as a processor or an SoC, a balance between different interests may be involved. On the one hand, debugging operations may utilize access to architectural features and logic blocks. Such debugging operations may include analysis, characterization, performance tuning, and resolution of issues related to undesired behavior. Debugging operations may extend to functionality of platforms, services, and applications.
On the other hand, exposure to sensitive information may be increased with debugging efforts, due to the type of access enjoyed by debugging tools. Chassis platform 1800 may attempt to protect architectural features and logic blocks of chassis platform 1800 protected from external access, in order to prevent secure information from being exposed or released without authorization.
As disclosed herein, a debug chassis security system for a processor or an SoC may involve a central logic block, a policy generator 1806 shown in FIG. 18B, that determines a debug policy 1826 for other logic blocks (also referred to as “IP blocks” or “IPs”). The central logic block is referred to as a “policy generator” and may be responsible for determining debug policy 1826 and enabling distribution of digital assets 1822 or debug assets 1823 by digital asset controller 1812, among other functionality.
Debug policy 1826 may be a single policy that the policy generator determines and propagates among the logic blocks in the chassis platform. Each logic block may receive debug policy 1826. Each logic block may include further internal logic for enforcing debug policy 1826 for an associated portion of the system. Digital asset controller 1812 may also receive debug policy 1826.
Digital assets 1822 may refer to certain security data, code, or keys that represent proprietary information for one or more stakeholders associated with the chassis platform, as mentioned. For example, digital assets 1822 may include fused keys that are written to each individual part during manufacture. Digital assets 1822 may be associated with a manufacturer, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM), a vendor, a subcontractor, an end user, an independent software vendor, or other stakeholder involved with production or sale or use of chassis platform 1801.
Policy generator 1806 may send debug policy 1826 to digital asset controller 1812. Based on debug policy 1826, digital asset controller 1812 may make a decision to distribute, or enable distribution of digital assets 1822 to the various logic blocks 1808. Digital assets 1822 may be released to logic blocks 1808 via fabric 1824 by digital asset controller 1812. Other security information may include global values, such as metal values or keys designed into a particular chassis global platform that are accessed by particular logic blocks, referred to as global keys 1830. Different ones of the logic blocks may use digital assets 1822 and global values for operation.
Policy generator 1806 may further be in communication with a test access port (TAP) 1804 implemented in the chassis platform. Test access port 1804 may be coupled to certain pins, referred to as debug pins, for realizing a communication interface to the chassis platform from an external debugging tool. Test access port 1804 may support different test interfaces and communication protocols. One common standard for processor test access is the Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) standard, also known as IEEE 1149.1 Standard Test Access Port and Boundary-Scan Architecture, which may be implemented using four interface pins and one optional pin. Other standards for processor test access using two pins include JTAG (IEEE 1149.7) and Serial Wire Debug (SWD) by ARM Holdings, Ltd. (ARM Debug Interface v5). In some implementations, test access port 1804 may support multiple test standards.
A debug user may accordingly connect and authenticate via test access port 1804. Then, debug user authentication 1820 may be forwarded to policy generator 1806, which may determine debug policy 1826 based on debug user authentication 1820. After debug policy 1826 is propagated to the various logic blocks 1808, each logic block 1808 may enforce a level of debug access using policy enforcer 1810, based on debug user authentication 1820. Thus, different levels of debug access may be implemented for a given debug policy 1826, ranging from a high level of debug access to lower levels of debug access. In a highest level of debug access, essentially all internal aspects of the chassis architecture may be accessible, and, thus, potentially exposed. The highest level of debug access may be reserved for a manufacturer of the chassis platform.
In the a debug chassis security architecture, certain basic debug policies 1826 may be implemented. Debug policies 1826 may be determined very early in the boot phase of chassis platform 1800. For example, an authentication window may be defined as a first time, or a first time period, that elapses after chassis platform 1800 is powered on. During the authentication window, policy generator 1806 may be available to receive debug user authentication 1820. After the authentication window is closed, policy generator 1806 may be prevented from receiving debug user authentication 1820 or altering a determined debug policy 1826.
One basic debug policy 1826 may be a live execution policy representing a final operational state of chassis platform 1800. In the live execution policy, policy generator 1806 may send debug policy 1826 to digital asset controller 1812. Based on the live execution policy, digital assets 1822 may be distributed from digital asset controller 1812 to logic blocks 1808 via fabric 1824. In the live execution policy, global keys 130 may be used by at least one logic block. In the live execution policy, the processor may be locked to prevent debug operations via test access port 1804. In certain embodiments, the live execution policy may be a default policy selected by policy generator 1806 when no test access port activity occurs, or no debug user authentication 1820 is received, when the authentication window is open.
Another basic debug policy may be an immediate authentication policy. When chassis platform 1800 receives debug user authentication 1820 corresponding to the immediate authentication policy when the authentication window is open, the immediate authentication policy may be determined as debug policy 1826 by policy generator 1806. In the immediate authentication policy, debug assets 1823 may be distributed by digital asset controller 1812 instead of digital assets 1822 in response to receiving debug policy 1826 from policy generator 1806. Debug assets 1823 may also be generated by digital asset controller 1812 and may represent ‘safe’ or non-proprietary values corresponding to the secure values in digital assets 1822, such that no security information is included in debug assets 1823. In this manner, the immediate authentication policy may enable safe debugging operation of chassis platform 1800 with lower risk of exposure of security information. In the immediate authentication policy, debug global values may be used by at least one logic block instead of global keys 130. The debug global values may be similar to debug assets 1823 in preventing exposure of sensitive or security information and enabling safe debugging operation of chassis platform 1800. In some embodiments, logic blocks 1808 may receive the debug global values from digital asset controller 1812 via fabric 1824. In other embodiments, the debug global values may be maintained and accessed from within logic blocks 1808, for example, using policy enforcer 1810. In the immediate authentication policy, based on debug user authentication 1820, the debug user may be authenticated to immediately unlock the processor to enable debug operations via test access port 1804. Because in the immediate authentication policy, debug assets 1823 and the debug global values are used, unlocking of the chassis platform may not expose digital assets 1822 or global keys 130.
However, the immediate authentication policy may have some drawbacks. For example, when certain errors or debug issues, such as those that occur with low statistical probability or low occurrence rates, are observed, a time period for debugging operation may be correspondingly long. When such errors or debug issues occur during manufacture of the chassis platform by an external entity, such as a contract manufacturer, large numbers of instances of chassis platform 1800 may remain in the unlocked state as a result of the immediate authentication policy for undesirably long periods of time, because of the low statistical occurrence rate of the debug issues. During this time, access to the large numbers of chassis platform 1800 may not be secure. Although the immediate authentication policy protects digital assets 1822 and global keys 130, as described, the various levels of access to logic blocks 1808 when chassis platform 1800 is unlocked may expose internal design features, which is undesirable for a manufacturer of chassis platform 1800. For example, when personnel from the manufacturer are engaged at a contract manufacturer site to debug chassis platform 1800, the personnel may have the highest level of debug access, which may undesirably expose all internal aspects of the chassis architecture via test access port 1804 in an environment that the manufacturer may not have sufficient security control over. In such situations, a risk of nefarious access to chassis platform 1800 may be significant for the manufacturer.
As will be described in further detail, yet another debug policy 1826, called a “delayed authentication policy”, may be implemented to overcome the security issues described with respect to the immediate authentication policy. In the delayed authentication policy, debug assets 1823 may be distributed by digital asset controller 1812 instead of digital assets 1822. In the delayed authentication policy, the debug global values may be used by at least one logic block 1808 instead of global keys 130. In the delayed authentication policy, chassis platform 1800 may be initially locked to prevent debug via test access port 1804. In the delayed authentication policy, based on debug user authentication 1820, a debug user may be authenticated to unlock the processor at a later time to enable debug via test access port 1804. In this manner, the delayed authentication policy may enable more flexible and secure debugging operation of chassis platform 1800 in various situations and environments, without risk of exposure of architectural features, digital assets 1822, or global keys 1830.
In FIG. 18A, Processor 1840 may include debug chassis security system 1801, for implementing various debug policies on chassis platform 1800. Debug chassis security system 1801 may communicate with a variety of logic blocks implemented within chassis platform 1800 via fabric 1824, which may be an I/O bus interface internal to chassis platform 1800. As shown, certain portions of fabric 1824 may be within processor 1840, while other portions of fabric 1824 may extend beyond processor 1840. Within processor 1840, fabric 1824 may enable debug chassis security system 1801 to communicate with logic blocks 1842. External to processor 1840, fabric 1824 may enable debug chassis security system 1801 to communicate with logic blocks 1844, which may represent peripheral chassis logic implemented on an SoC. Global keys 1830 may be accessible to at least some of logic blocks 1842 and 1844 and may be used for various purposes by respective logic blocks 1842 and 1844, including for communication among certain ones of logic blocks 1842 and 1844.
Debug chassis security system 1801 may authenticate a debug user and enable access to various ones of logic blocks 1842 and 1844. Debug chassis security system 1801 may, for such purposes, detect, decide upon, select, implement and distribute a debug policy. Debug policy 1826 may define what level of access a particular debug user enjoys to logic blocks 1842 and 1844 or to other information or functionality implemented in logic in chassis platform 1801. Examples of debug policies include a live execution policy, an immediate debug policy, and a delayed authentication policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.
In debug chassis security system 1803, debug pins 1802 may represent physical pins on the chassis platform for a test interface to test access port (TAP) 1804. After the chassis platform is powered on, policy generator may open an authentication window. During the authentication window, a debug user may use debug pins 1802 to connect to test access port 1804. The debug user may then attempt to authenticate themselves to chassis platform 1801 by providing debug user authentication 1820 to chassis platform 1801, for example, such as user or account credentials. In one embodiment, debug user authentication 1820 may be received by policy generator 1806 from TAP 1804.
In debug chassis security system 1803, digital asset controller 1812 may manage or control digital assets 1822. In some embodiments, digital assets 1822 include values written to fuses, referred to as fused key values, representing secure information for use by logic blocks 1808. The secure information may be associated with a manufacturer, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM), a vendor, a subcontractor, an end user, an independent software vendor, or other stakeholder involved with production or sale or use of chassis platform 1801.
Policy generator 1806 may distribute debug policy 1826 to digital asset controller 1812. Digital asset controller 1812 may, depending on debug policy 1826, distribute digital assets 1822 or debug assets 1823 to logic blocks 1808. Debug assets 1823 may include safe information while the digital assets 1822 may include secure information. In particular embodiments, digital asset controller 1812 may generate and distribute debug assets 1823 instead of digital assets 1822. In some embodiments, digital assets 1822 may be indicative of a lifecycle stage of the chassis platform and may determine how the chassis platform is access, or by which debug user or types of debug users, during various lifecycle stages, such as design, tapeout, test, production, etc. The digital assets 1822 or debug assets 1823 may be received before, during, or after a period when the authentication window is open, in different embodiments.
In debug chassis security system 1803, policy generator 1806 may receive debug user authentication 1820 and select or determine debug policy 1826 based at least in part debug user authentication 1820. Policy generator 1806 may authenticate the debug user using a hardware authentication engine (not shown) included within policy generator 1806. The hardware authentication engine may be another logic block within policy generator 1806. Policy generator 1806 may authenticate the debug user using a firmware authentication engine 1832 included within the chassis platform, which may provide additional flexibility in managing the authentication process. Authenticating the debug user may include locking or unlocking access to certain portions of debug chassis security system 1803, such as selected ones of logic blocks 1808, by test access port 1804. Depending on debug policy 1826 (see also FIGS. 19A, 19B, and 19C), the authentication window may be closed or may remain open, as with the delayed authentication policy. Policy generator may distribute debug policy 1826 to logic blocks 1808 and to digital asset controller 1812 via fabric 1824. Fabric 1824 may be implemented, for example, by an I/O bus interface internal to the chassis platform. Global keys 1830 may be accessible to logic blocks 1808 and may be used for various purposes by logic blocks 1808, including for communication among certain ones of logic blocks 1808.
In debug chassis security system 1803, logic blocks 1808 may represent various functional elements within the chassis platform. In various embodiments, logic blocks 1808 may represent any of logic blocks 1842 and 1844 described above with respect to FIG. 18A. Logic blocks 1808 may include policy enforcer 1810. In one embodiment, policy enforcer 1810 may be different for each one of logic blocks 1808. Policy enforcer 1810 may enable logic block 1808 to enforce debug policy 1826, for example, by providing a level of debug access to logic block 1808. The level of debug access provided by policy enforcer 1810 to logic block 1808 may depend upon debug user authentication 1820. As shown in FIG. 18B, logic block 1808-1 includes policy enforcer 1810-1, logic block 1808-2 includes policy enforcer 1810-2, and so on, up to logic block 1808-N that includes policy enforcer 1810-N, where N is a desired number of logic blocks 1808 in the chassis platform.
FIGS. 19A, 19B, and 19c are illustrations of example methods 1900, 1920, and 1940, respectively within a chassis platform, such as chassis platform 1800, for a delayed authentication debug policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Although methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 may include certain common elements, method 1900 may generally depict implementation of a live execution policy, method 1920 may generally depict implementation of an immediate debug policy, and method 1940 may generally depict implementation of a delayed authentication policy, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.
In FIG. 19A, at 1902, method 1900 may include detecting power on of a chassis platform. At 1904, a debug authentication window may be opened for the chassis platform.
At 1906 a decision may be made whether a debug user did logon when the debug authentication window is open. When the result of 1906 is YES, a debug user did logon and method 1900 may proceed to method 1920 (see FIG. 19B). When no debug user logged on the result of 1906 is NO, at 1908, the authentication window may be closed, the chassis platform may be locked, and a live execution policy may be selected.
At 1910, the live execution policy may be distributed to a digital asset controller and to logic blocks implemented in the chassis platform, the live execution policy in which the logic blocks use global keys.
At 1912, digital assets may be distributed, by the digital asset controller, to the logic blocks, the digital assets including secure information for use by the logic blocks.
In FIG. 19B, at 1922, method 1920 may include receiving, at the policy generator, a debug user authentication for the debug user. In one embodiment, the debug user authentication may be received via a test access port on the chassis platform.
At 1924 a decision may be made whether the debug user authentication indicates delayed authentication. When the result of 1924 is YES, method 1920 may proceed to method 1942 (see FIG. 19C). When the result of 1924 is NO, at 1926, based on the debug user authentication, the chassis platform may be unlocked for debugging operation and an immediate authentication policy may be selected.
At 1928, the authentication window may be closed. The authentication may be closed after a first time elapses after the chassis platform was powered on at 1902. At 1930, the immediate authentication policy may be distributed to a digital asset controller and to logic blocks implemented in the chassis platform, the immediate authentication policy in which the logic blocks use debug keys instead of the global keys.
At 1932, debug assets may be distributed, by the digital asset controller, to the logic blocks, the debug assets including safe information for use by the logic blocks.
In FIG. 19C, at 1942, method 1940 may include locking the chassis platform, enabling delayed authentication by the debug user, and selecting a delayed authentication policy.
At 1946, the delayed authentication policy may be distributed to a digital asset controller and to logic blocks implemented in the chassis platform, the delayed authentication policy in which the logic blocks use debug keys instead of the global keys.
At 1948, debug assets may be distributed, by the digital asset controller, to the logic blocks, the debug assets including safe information for use by the logic blocks.
At 1952, at a later time when the chassis platform is unlocked, a second debug user authentication may be received via the test access port. At 1954, based on the second debug user authentication, the chassis platform may be unlocked for debugging operation.
Methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 may be initiated by any suitable criteria. Furthermore, although methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 describes an operation of particular elements, methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 may be performed by any suitable combination or type of elements. For example, methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 may be implemented by the elements illustrated in FIGS. 1-19C or any other system operable to implement method 1900. As such, the preferred initialization point for methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 and the order of the elements comprising methods 1900, 1920, and 1940 may depend on the implementation chosen. In some embodiments, some elements may be optionally omitted, repeated, or combined.
Embodiments of the mechanisms disclosed herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination of such implementation approaches. Embodiments of the disclosure may be implemented as computer programs or program code executing on programmable systems comprising at least one processor, a storage system (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device.
Program code may be applied to input instructions to perform the functions described herein and generate output information. The output information may be applied to one or more output devices, in known fashion. For purposes of this application, a processing system may include any system that has a processor, such as, for example; a digital signal processor (DSP), a microcontroller, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or a microprocessor.
The program code may be implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a processing system. The program code may also be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In fact, the mechanisms described herein are not limited in scope to any particular programming language. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language.
One or more aspects of at least one embodiment may be implemented by representative instructions stored on a machine-readable medium which represents various logic within the processor, which when read by a machine causes the machine to fabricate logic to perform the techniques described herein. Such representations, known as “IP cores” may be stored on a tangible, machine-readable medium and supplied to various customers or manufacturing facilities to load into the fabrication machines that actually make the logic or processor.
Such machine-readable storage media may include, without limitation, non-transitory, tangible arrangements of articles manufactured or formed by a machine or device, including storage media such as hard disks, any other type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), static random access memories (SRAMs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), flash memories, electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic or optical cards, or any other type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions.
Accordingly, embodiments of the disclosure may also include non-transitory, tangible machine-readable media containing instructions or containing design data, such as Hardware Description Language (HDL), which defines structures, circuits, apparatuses, processors and/or system features described herein. Such embodiments may also be referred to as program products.
In some cases, an instruction converter may be used to convert an instruction from a source instruction set to a target instruction set. For example, the instruction converter may translate (e.g., using static binary translation, dynamic binary translation including dynamic compilation), morph, emulate, or otherwise convert an instruction to one or more other instructions to be processed by the core. The instruction converter may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or a combination thereof. The instruction converter may be on processor, off processor, or part-on and part-off processor.
A processor may include a test access port, a logic block, a digital asset controller, and a policy generator. In the processor, the logic block, may include a first logic to enforce a debug policy to components within the logic block with global keys, debug global values, digital assets, and debug assets. In the processor, the digital assets may be to include secure information for use by the logic block, and the debug assets may be to include safe information for use by the logic block. In the processor, the digital asset controller may include a second logic to manage the digital assets based on a debug policy. In the processor, the policy generator may include a third logic to receive a debug user authentication for a debug user accessing the processor via the test access port. In the processor, the policy generator may further include a fourth logic to, based at least on the debug user authentication, determine a debug policy for the processor, the debug policy including a delayed authentication policy. In the processor, the policy generator may further include a fifth logic to distribute the debug policy to the logic block and to the digital asset controller. In the processor, the policy generator may further include a sixth logic to lock the processor to prevent debug operation via the test access port based on the delayed authentication policy, and a seventh logic to unlock the processor at a later time to enable debugging operations via the test access port based on the debug user authentication. In the processor, the logic block may further include an eighth logic to determine to use the debug global values based on the delayed authentication policy. In the processor, the digital asset controller may further include a ninth logic to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the delayed authentication policy.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the third logic may be to receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the processor is powered on, and keep the authentication window open until the later time based on the delayed authentication policy. In the processor, the policy generator may further include a tenth logic to receive a second debug user authentication via the test access port during the later time, an eleventh logic to determine that the second debug user authentication is privileged to unlock the processor, and a twelfth logic to, based on the second debug user authentication, unlock the processor to enable debugging operation via the test access port.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the debug policy may include a live execution policy. In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the third logic may be to receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the processor is powered on, close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time, and select the live execution policy when no debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed. In the processor, the policy generator may further include a thirteenth logic to lock the processor to prevent debugging operation via the test access port based on the live execution policy. In the processor, the logic block may further include a fourteenth logic to use the global keys based on the live execution policy. In the processor, the digital asset controller may further include a fifteenth logic to distribute the digital assets to the logic block based on the live execution policy.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the debug policy may include an immediate authentication policy. In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the third logic may be to receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the processor is powered on, close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time, and select the immediate authentication policy when the debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed. In the processor, the policy generator may further include a seventeenth logic to, based on the debug user authentication and the immediate authentication policy, authenticate the debug user to immediately unlock the processor to enable debugging operation via the test access port. In the processor, the logic block may further include an eighteenth logic to use the debug global values based on the immediate authentication policy. In the processor, the digital asset controller may further include a nineteenth logic to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the immediate authentication policy; and
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the logic block may further include a twentieth logic to, based on the debug user authentication, determine a level of debug access for the debug user to the components, via the test access port, within the logic block.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the policy generator may further include a twenty-first logic to authenticate the debug user using a hardware authentication engine, and a twenty-second logic to authenticate the debug user using a firmware authentication engine.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the processor, the digital assets may include fused key values distributed by the digital asset controller. In the processor, the global keys may include keys implemented in metal in the processor.
A method may include, within a chassis platform, receiving, at a policy generator in a debug chassis security system included in the chassis platform, debug user authentication for a debug user accessing the chassis platform via a test access port. Based at least on the debug user authentication, the method may include determining a debug policy for the chassis platform, and distributing the debug policy to a logic block implemented in the chassis platform and to a digital asset controller. In the method, the logic block receiving the debug policy may include the logic block enforcing the debug policy to components within the logic block. In the method, the digital asset controller may be to, based on the debug policy, distribute digital assets to the logic block, the digital assets including secure information for use by the logic block, and distribute debug assets to the logic block, the debug assets including safe information for use by the logic block. In the method, the debug policy may include a delayed authentication policy further comprising distributing, by the digital asset controller, the debug assets to the logic block, indicating to the logic block to use debug global values, initially locking the chassis platform to prevent debugging operation via the test access port, and enabling an authenticated debug user to unlock the chassis platform at a later time to enable debugging operation via the test access port.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the method, receiving the debug user authentication may include receiving the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the chassis platform is powered on and remains open until the later time, based on the delayed authentication policy. In the method, the delayed authentication policy may include receiving a second debug user authentication via the test access port during the later time, determining that the second debug user authentication is privileged to unlock the chassis platform, and, based on the second debug user authentication, unlocking the chassis platform for debugging operation via the test access port.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the method, the debug policy may include a live execution policy. In the method, the live execution policy may include selecting the live execution policy when no debug user authentication is received during an authentication window that opens after the chassis platform is powered on and closes after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time. In the method, the live execution policy may further include distributing the digital assets to the logic block, indicating to the logic block to use the global keys, and locking the chassis platform to prevent debugging operation via the test access port.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the method, the debug policy may include an immediate authentication policy. In the method, the immediate authentication policy may include selecting the immediate execution policy when the debug user authentication is received during an authentication window that opens after the chassis platform is powered on and closes after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time. In the method, the immediate authentication policy may further include distributing the debug assets to the logic block, indicating to the logic block to use debug global values, and, based on the debug user authentication, authenticating the debug user to immediately unlock the chassis platform to enable debugging operation via the test access port.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the method, receiving the debug user authentication may include, based on the debug user authentication, determining a level of debug access, via the test access port, to the logic block.
In any of the disclosed embodiments, the method may include, based on the debug user authentication, authenticating the debug user using at least one of a hardware authentication engine, and a firmware authentication engine.
A system may include a test access port, a logic block, a digital asset controller, and a policy generator. In the system, the logic block, may include a first logic to enforce a debug policy to components within the logic block with global keys, debug global values, digital assets, and debug assets. In the system, the digital assets may be to include secure information for use by the logic block, and the debug assets may be to include safe information for use by the logic block. In the system, the digital asset controller may include a second logic to manage the digital assets based on a debug policy. In the system, the policy generator may include a third logic to receive a debug user authentication for a debug user accessing the system via the test access port. In the system, the policy generator may further include a fourth logic to, based at least on the debug user authentication, determine a debug policy for the system, the debug policy including a delayed authentication policy. In the system, the policy generator may further include a fifth logic to distribute the debug policy to the logic block and to the digital asset controller. In the system, the policy generator may further include a sixth logic to lock the system to prevent debug operation via the test access port based on the delayed authentication policy, and a seventh logic to unlock the system at a later time to enable debugging operation via the test access port based on the debug user authentication. In the system, the logic block may further include an eighth logic to determine to use the debug global values based on the delayed authentication policy. In the system, the digital asset controller may further include a ninth logic to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the delayed authentication policy.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the third logic may be to receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the system is powered on, and keep the authentication window open until the later time based on the delayed authentication policy. In the system, the policy generator may further include a tenth logic to receive a second debug user authentication via the test access port during the later time, an eleventh logic to determine that the second debug user authentication is privileged to unlock the system, and a twelfth logic to, based on the second debug user authentication, unlock the system to enable debugging operation via the test access port.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the debug policy may include a live execution policy. In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the third logic may be to receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the system is powered on, close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time, and select the live execution policy when no debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed. In the system, the policy generator may further include a thirteenth logic to lock the system to prevent debugging operation via the test access port based on the live execution policy. In the system, the logic block may further include a fourteenth logic to use the global keys based on the live execution policy. In the system, the digital asset controller may further include a fifteenth logic to distribute the digital assets to the logic block based on the live execution policy.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the debug policy may include an immediate authentication policy. In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the third logic may be to receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the system is powered on, close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time, and select the immediate authentication policy when the debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed. In the system, the policy generator may further include a seventeenth logic to, based on the debug user authentication and the immediate authentication policy, authenticate the debug user to immediately unlock the system to enable debugging operation via the test access port. In the system, the logic block may further include an eighteenth logic to use the debug global values based on the immediate authentication policy. In the system, the digital asset controller may further include a nineteenth logic to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the immediate authentication policy; and
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the logic block may further include a twentieth logic to, based on the debug user authentication, determine a level of debug access for the debug user to the components, via the test access port, within the logic block.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the policy generator may further include a twenty-first logic to authenticate the debug user using a hardware authentication engine, and a twenty-second logic to authenticate the debug user using a firmware authentication engine.
In any of the disclosed embodiments of the system, the digital assets may include fused key values distributed by the digital asset controller. In the system, the global keys may include keys implemented in metal in the system.
Thus, techniques for performing one or more instructions according to at least one embodiment are disclosed. While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on other embodiments, and that such embodiments not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon studying this disclosure. In an area of technology such as this, where growth is fast and further advancements are not easily foreseen, the disclosed embodiments may be readily modifiable in arrangement and detail as facilitated by enabling technological advancements without departing from the principles of the present disclosure or the scope of the accompanying claims.

## Claims

1. A processor, comprising:
a test access port;
a logic block, including circuitry to enforce a debug policy to components within the logic block with global keys, debug global values, digital assets, and debug assets;
a digital asset controller including circuitry to manage the digital assets based on a debug policy;
a policy generator including circuitry to:
receive a debug user authentication for a debug user accessing the processor via the test access port;
based at least on the debug user authentication, determine a debug policy for the processor, the debug policy including a delayed authentication policy; and
distribute the debug policy to the logic block and to the digital asset controller;
lock the processor to prevent debugging operation via the test access port based on the delayed authentication policy; and
unlock the processor at a later time to enable debugging operation via the test access port based on the debug user authentication;


wherein:
the logic block further includes circuitry to:
determine to use the debug global values based on the delayed authentication policy, and
distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the delayed authentication policy.

2. The processor of claim 1, wherein the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the processor is powered on; and
keep the authentication window open until the later time based on the delayed authentication policy; and
receive a second debug user authentication via the test access port during the later time;
determine that the second debug user authentication is privileged to unlock the processor; and
based on the second debug user authentication, unlock the processor to enable debugging operation via the test access port.

3. The processor of claim 1, wherein:
the debug policy includes a live execution policy;
the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the processor is powered on;
close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time; and
select the live execution policy when no debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed; and
lock the processor to prevent debugging operation via the test access port based on the live execution policy;

the logic block further includes circuitry to use the global keys based on the live execution policy; and
the digital asset controller further includes circuitry to distribute the digital assets to the logic block based on the live execution policy.

4. The processor of claim 1, wherein:
the debug policy includes an immediate authentication policy;
the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the processor is powered on;
close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time;
select the immediate authentication policy when the debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed;
based on the debug user authentication and the immediate authentication policy, authenticate the debug user to immediately unlock the processor to enable debugging operation via the test access port;

the logic block further includes circuitry to use the debug global values based on the immediate authentication policy; and
the digital asset controller further includes circuitry to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the immediate authentication policy.

5. The processor of claim 1, wherein the logic block further includes circuitry to, based on the debug user authentication, determine a level of debug access for the debug user to the components, via the test access port, within the logic block.

6. The processor of claim 1, wherein the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
authenticate the debug user using a hardware authentication engine; and
authenticate the debug user using a firmware authentication engine.

7. The processor of claim 1, wherein:
the digital assets include fused key values distributed by the digital asset controller; and
the global keys include keys implemented in metal in the processor.

8. A method comprising, within a chassis platform:
receiving, at a policy generator in a debug chassis security system included in the chassis platform, debug user authentication for a debug user accessing the chassis platform via a test access port;
based at least on the debug user authentication, determining a debug policy for the chassis platform;
distributing the debug policy to a logic block implemented in the chassis platform and to a digital asset controller, wherein the logic block receiving the debug policy includes the logic block enforcing the debug policy to components within the logic block;
distributing, with the digital asset controller and based on the debug policy, digital assets to the logic block;
distributing, with the digital asset controller and based on the debug policy, debug assets to the logic block; and
wherein the debug policy includes a delayed authentication policy further comprising:
distributing, by the digital asset controller, the debug assets to the logic block;
indicating to the logic block to use debug global values;
initially locking the chassis platform to prevent debugging operation via the test access port; and
enabling an authenticated debug user to unlock the chassis platform at a later time to enable debugging operation via the test access port.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein receiving the debug user authentication includes:
receiving the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the chassis platform is powered on and remains open until the later time, based on the delayed authentication policy, and

the delayed authentication policy further comprising:
receiving a second debug user authentication via the test access port during the later time;
determining that the second debug user authentication is privileged to unlock the chassis platform; and
based on the second debug user authentication, unlocking the chassis platform for debugging operation via the test access port.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the debug policy includes a live execution policy further comprising:
when no debug user authentication is received during an authentication window that opens after the chassis platform is powered on and closes after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time, selecting the live execution policy;
distributing the digital assets to the logic block;
indicating to the logic block to use the global keys; and
locking the chassis platform to prevent debugging operation via the test access port.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the debug policy includes an immediate authentication policy further comprising:
when the debug user authentication is received during an authentication window that opens after the chassis platform is powered on and closes after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time, selecting the immediate execution policy;
distributing the debug assets to the logic block;
indicating to the logic block to use debug global values; and
based on the debug user authentication, authenticating the debug user to immediately unlock the chassis platform to enable debugging operation via the test access port.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein receiving the debug user authentication includes:
based on the debug user authentication, determining a level of debug access, via the test access port, to the logic block.

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising, based on the debug user authentication, authenticating the debug user using at least one of:
a hardware authentication engine; and
a firmware authentication engine.

14. A system, comprising:
a test access port;
a logic block, including circuitry to:
enforce a debug policy to components within the logic block with global keys, debug global values, digital assets, and debug assets;

a digital asset controller including circuitry to manage the digital assets based on a debug policy;
a policy generator including circuitry to:
receive a debug user authentication for a debug user accessing the system via the test access port;
based at least on the debug user authentication, determine a debug policy for the system, the debug policy including a delayed authentication policy; and
distribute the debug policy to the logic block and to the digital asset controller;
lock the system to prevent debug operation via the test access port based on the delayed authentication policy; and
unlock the system at a later time to enable debugging operation via the test access port based on the debug user authentication,

wherein:
the logic block further includes circuitry to determine to use the debug global values based on the delayed authentication policy; and
the digital asset controller further includes circuitry to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the delayed authentication policy.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the systemic powered on; and
keep the authentication window open until the later time based on the delayed authentication policy; and
receive a second debug user authentication via the test access port during the later time;
determine that the second debug user authentication is privileged to unlock the system; and
based on the second debug user authentication, unlock the system to enable debugging operation via the test access port.

16. The system of claim 14, wherein:
the debug policy includes a live execution policy;
the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the systemic powered on;
close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time; and
select the live execution policy when no debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed;
lock the system to prevent debugging operation via the test access port based on the live execution policy;

the logic block further includes circuitry to use the global keys based on the live execution policy; and
the digital asset controller further includes circuitry to distribute the digital assets to the logic block based on the live execution policy.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein:
the debug policy includes an immediate authentication policy;
the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
receive the debug user authentication during an authentication window that opens after the systemic powered on;
close the authentication window after a first time elapses, the later time extending beyond the first time; and
select the immediate authentication policy when the debug user authentication is received before the authentication window is closed;
based on the debug user authentication and the immediate authentication policy, authenticate the debug user to immediately unlock the system to enable debugging operation via the test access port;

the logic block further includes circuitry to use the debug global values based on the immediate authentication policy; and
the digital asset controller further includes circuitry to distribute the debug assets to the logic block based on the immediate authentication policy.

18. The system of claim 14, wherein the logic block further includes circuitry to, based on the debug user authentication, determine a level of debug access for the debug user to the components, via the test access port, within the logic block.

19. The system of claim 14, wherein the policy generator further includes circuitry to:
authenticate the debug user using a hardware authentication engine; and
authenticate the debug user using a firmware authentication engine.

20. The system of claim 14, wherein:
the digital assets include fused key values distributed by the digital asset controller; and
the global keys include keys implemented in metal in the system.