alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2






June 13, 2017


Susan Daggett 
Noodles & Company
520 Zang Street, Suite D
Broomfield, CO 80021
Dear Sue:
We are excited to have you serve as the interim Chief Financial Officer of Noodles & Company (the “Company”).  In recognition of this new position, the Company will pay to you a nondiscretionary bonus payment of $8,333 per month, payable monthly, while you serve as interim CFO.  This nondiscretionary bonus is in addition to the base salary you currently receive from the Company, which will remain unchanged.
We are very pleased to have you in a leadership role during this exciting time for the Company. Please confirm your agreement to the terms specified in this letter by signing below.
Sincerely,


/s/ Dave Boennighausen
Dave Boennighausen
Chief Executive Officer


AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:


/s/ Susan Daggett 
Susan Daggett




520 Zang Street, Suite D Broomfield, Colorado 80021 720-214-1900
Maria REIMUNDO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5529 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize additional grant 

activities for Hispanic-serving institutions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2016 

Mr. HECK of Nevada (for himself, Mr. HINOJOSA, and Mr. RUIZ) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize 

additional grant activities for Hispanic-serving institutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accessing Higher Edu5 cation Opportunities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED GRANT ACTIVITIES. 

7 Subsection (b) of section 503 of the Higher Edu8 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1101b(b)) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5529 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through 

2 (16) as paragraphs (9) through (18), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(7) Student support programs (which may in7 clude counseling, mentoring, and other support serv8 ices) designed to facilitate the successful advance9 ment of students from four-year institutions to 

10 postbaccalaureate doctoral degree granting programs 

11 that prepare students for health care occupations as 

12 such occupations are described in the most recent 

13 edition of the Occupational Outlook Handbook pub14 lished by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

15 ‘‘(8) Developing or expanding access to dual or 

16 concurrent enrollment programs and early college 

17 high school programs.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. FUNDING. 

19 (a) AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

20 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out part A of 

21 title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

22 1101 et seq.), as amended by this Act, $107,795,000 for 

23 fiscal year 2016. 

24 (b) ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS NOT PERMITTED.— 

25 Section 422 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5529 IH

1 U.S.C. 1226a) shall not apply to further extend the dura2 tion of the authority under subsection (a). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Ariel

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - new york(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(1)

publication        May 1, 2023        Constraints on the composition and thermal structure of Ariel’s icy crust as inferred from its largest observed impact crater

staff profileAriel Leon

staff profileAriel Doumbouya

staff profileAriele Kramer

publication        January 1, 1987        Geological terrains and crater frequencies on Ariel

map        August 1, 2004        Geologic Map of the Ariel Quadrangle, Clark and Cowlitz Counties, Washington

publication        January 1, 1998        Hydrologic modeling of two glaciated watersheds in Northeast Pennsylvania

Presentations and Events        May 23, 2017        Hydrography Seminar Series - Session 9 (NHDPlus HR)

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Photo Contest Winners January 2021

publication        January 1, 1986        Voyager 2 in the Uranian system: Imaging science results

Presentations and Events        June 29, 2023        PubTalk-06/2023: Next Generation Topographic Mapping

General        September 5, 2018        Hydrography Seminar Series, Seminar 9 - May, 2017

Photography        December 21, 2020        Checking on passive loggers in Ausable Tributary, Lake Placid, NY

Posters        May 25, 2023        June Public Lecture Flyer, 2023

Presentations and Events        May 25, 2023        PubTalk-05/2023: Harnessing Our Greatest Life Force - Swim with Us Through Water Data for the Nation
Exhibit 23.1

[GRAPHIC LOGO OMITTED]
MOSS-ADAMS LLP
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors
FNB Bancorp


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 of FNB Bancorp (No. 333-91596, 333-98293 and 333-106363) of our report
dated March 28, 2006 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of FNB
Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2005 appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


/s/ Moss Adams LLP
-----------------------------------
Stockton, California
March 28, 2006
### 4giHim4- i

476 0 Airpor tRoa d Cincinnati , Ohi o 4522 6 Phone : (513 ) 871-996 6 Fax : (513 ) 871-926 1 Certifie d Repai rStatio n # E5ZR316 Y Email : SiQnatureEnaines@fuse.ne t Contact : Steve n ADarr , Chie fInspecto r U.S
. Departmen to fTransportatio n Docke t (Managemen t Syste m 120 0 NewJerse yAvenue , S E Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Petitio n fo rExemptio n Reques t fro m par t120 , par t9 1 t o 135
. See k a n exemptio n unde rapplicabl e regulation s 1 4 CF R Part120
. Subpar t E - § § 120.103 , 120.105 , 120.11 7 Publi cinteres t o rsafet ywoul d no t b e affecte d becaus e o fn o personne l change
. Part13 5 ha s a dru g testin g progra m i n effec tan d n o chang e i n personnel , onl y(1 ) fligh t crew . Operation s onl yoperat e i n th e Unite d States
. Cre wmembe rneve rrefuse s a dru g test . T o duplicat e pape rwor k serve s n o safet yissue
.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

          - 11 CFR Parts 100, 104 and 110
          - [Notice 2009-03]

### Correction

In rule document E9-2838 beginning on page 7285 in the issue of Tuesday, February 17, 2009 make the following correction:

On page 7288, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in the second line,

“are given, they must d”

should read

“are given, they must disclose applicable contributions of the PAC on their semi-annual reports.”.

[FR Doc. Z9-2838 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Jamel PICKKEY v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS, et al.

NO. 2018-CT-1065

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

*493WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that petitioner sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Timothy LOWE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0703, 3D18-0702

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Angela LAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 14, 2018

Mike Graves, Public Defender, and Amanda Sizemore, Assistant Public Defender, Ocala, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the July 9, 2018 order on motion to mitigate and the July 10, 2018 amended judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2016-CF-1928, in the *1285Circuit Court in and for Marion County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., and ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Sofia FERNANDEZ and Rafael Fernandez, Appellants, v. SAFA FINANCIALS, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2576

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen L. Cobb, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trans-Century
Resources, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003

/s/ Stephen L. Cobb
-------------------
Stephen L. Cobb
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 21.1**

**DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF AMIS HOLDINGS, INC.**

AMI Semiconductor, Inc. 

AMI Acquisition LLC 

AMIS Foreign Holdings, Inc. 

AMI Semiconductor Canada Company 

AMI Semiconductor Asia Ltd 

AMI Semiconductor Ghb (Germany) 

AMI Semiconductor Japan Co. Ltd 

AMI Semiconductor Philippines Inc. 

Emma Mixed Signal CV 

AMI Semiconductor Netherlands BV 

AMI Semiconductor Belgium BVBA 

AMI Semiconductor Czech SRO 

AMI Semiconductor Leasing BVBA 

AMI Semiconductor Bulgaria EOOD 

AMI Semiconductor Switzerland SA 

AMI Semiconductor Korea Ltd 

AMI Semiconductor Israel Ltd 

AMI Semiconductor U.K. Ltd
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**RULE      13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934      AND**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                September 15, 2008 |                                         |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                    | /s/                William Bloking           |
|                                    | William                Bloking               |
|                                    | President                                    |
|                                    | (Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
Susan MORROW, Appellant, v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020351EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9592 — Freudenberg/L&B)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 351/01)

On 17 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9592. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9592. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
STATE EX REL. KHANH LE v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1007

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
LINIVERSITV 

CF Wyo 1\1\ INc~ 

College of Arts and Sciences 

Dept. 3254 • Room 113, A&S Building • 1 000 E University Ave. • Loramie, Wyoming 82071 

(307) 766-4106 • fox: {307) 766-2697 • e-mail: osdeon@uwyo.edu • www.uwyo.edu/a&s 

Mr. Michael Mmtin 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington DC 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

'2· . b f''J -~ 

It has come to my attention that the Department of Transp01tation will be selecting an airline to 

serve LAR-DEN under the EAS program. This is an important matter to the College of Arts and 

Sciences at the University of Wyoming, as good airline service is an essential. 

This College is the largest in the University of Wyoming having some 500 faculty and 120 staff. 

It serves a great number of students both as College majors and in offering courses needed by 

other colleges. We require good airline service not only for our faculty, staff and students, but for 

the many visitors who come to the campus. These visitors include "official" persons such as 

those coming for seminars, sales to departments, maintenance, etc. and from government 

agencies. They also include the parents of our students many of whom visit quite often. 

I have learned that Sky West and Great Lakes have submitted proposals for the LAR~DEN 

service. I have had much experience with Great Lakes both personally and from feed-back from 

the College's personnel. It has been uniformly bad and has caused many individuals to opt to 

drive to Denver. This defeats our desire to have good, reliable air service. On the other hand I 

know Sky West not only as a passenger on other routes, but in terms of their operations in 

Wyoming. They are a solid, reliable airline with reasonable fares. I support their application. 

Further, I can understand the DOT's interest in discontinuing the EAS subsidy. This can be 

realized by eliminating the "leakage" in the going to Denver. Good, reliable and reasonably 

priced air service can accomplish this. The UW College of Arts and Sciences will certainly 

support this goal. I
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41193 Summary Calendar

ROGERS LEE JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES November 21, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In Jackson v. Apfel , 120 S. Ct. 2657 (2000), the Supreme Court granted Rogers Lee Jackson’s petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of its decision in Sims v. Apfel , 120 S. Ct. 2080 (2000), which rejected the view that a social security claimant must exhaust issues in a request for review by the Appeals Council in order to preserve judicial review of those issues. Jackson appeals from a judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for disability insurance benefits, 42 U.S.C. §No. 98-41193 -2- 405(g). He contends that the Commissioner failed to apply the correct legal standards and that his decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we conclude that the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain Jackson’s claim of hearing loss because he did not raise the issue before the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), thus failing to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Dominick v. Bowen , 861 F.2d 1330, 1332 (5th Cir. 1988). In this appeal, Jackson does not argue whether substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision vis-a-vis his claims of right-eye blindness and a foot injury. Accordingly, Jackson abandons these issue. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally, Jackson’s challenges the adequacy of the ALJ’s notice to Jackson of his rights to representation and to review the evidence to be utilized in deciding his disability claim are refuted by the record. Nor does the hearing transcript support his challenge to the adequacy of the de novo administrative hearing before the ALJ. See Carrier v. Sullivan , 944 F.2d 243, 245 (5th Cir. 1991) (hearing held adequate where ALJ reminded claimant that he could be represented by counsel and questioned claimant extensively about his condition, treatment which he had received, medication he was taking, as well as his daily routines, and how his illness had affected them).
AFFIRMED.