alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Total  Entertainment,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
B.  Davis.,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ RICHARD B. DAVIS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard B. Davis

August 15, 2005
Ruben SOTO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1019

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - (-)news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        September 2, 2015        What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard 

Interviews        July 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 97 – EROS 50th: Earth As Art Bonus

Interviews        September 15, 2010        Making Waves: Hypoxia in U.S. Coastal Waters

Interviews        May 10, 2010        Recovery Act Funds Benefit Louisiana Black Bears

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
Luis R. BOSCHETTI, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LB CAPITAL COLLECTIONS, LLC, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Remanded.

Denied.
Form CGFD99 (6/10/2019)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 22−11098−MAM

Chapter: 7

In re:

Robert W. Szostak

aka Bert Szostak

3191 S Dixie Hwy

Apt 515

West Palm Beach, FL 33405

SSN: xxx−xx−3597

NOTICE OF PRO BONO RESOURCES

AND PRO SE (SELF−REPRESENTED) CLINICS

 The following resources are available if you wish to retain an attorney and are interested in learning about qualifications for

receiving pro bono (free) or reduced fee legal representations.

• The Florida Bar Referral Service

 www.floridabar.org

• The Bankruptcy Bar Pro Bono Resource Locator

 http://www.floridalawhelp.org

• or the following non−profit organization(s) which provides free or reduced fee legal representation to qualified people

in your area:

Dade Legal Aid/Put Something Back

123 N.W. First Avenue

Miami, Florida 33128

Telephone: (305) 579−5733

Fax: (305) 372−7693

http://www.dadelegalaid.org

http://www.dadecountyprobono.org

Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County

423 Fern Street, #200

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Telephone: (561) 655−8944

Telephone: (800) 403−9353

Fax: (561) 655−5269

http://www.legalaidpbc.org

Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc.

1321 E. Memorial Blvd.

Lakeland, FL 33801

Telephone: (863) 688−7376

http://www.frls.org

or

121 N. 2nd Street, 4th Floor

Fort Pierce, FL 34950

Telephone: (772) 466−4766

http://www.frls.org

Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc.

4343 W Flagler Street, Suite 100

Miami, FL 33134

Telephone: (305) 576−0080

http://legalservicesmiami.org

Legal Aid Service of Broward County, Inc.

491 N. State Road 7

Plantation, Florida 33317

Telephone: (954) 765−8950

http://www.legalaid.org

Broward County residents only where

filing will save the home.

Coast to Coast Legal Aid of South Florida, Inc.

491 N. State Road 7, Second Floor

Plantation, Florida 33317

Telephone: (954) 765−8955

http://coasttocoastlegalaid.org

Broward County residents 60+ where filing will

save the home.

Assistance from these organizations may be based upon the availability of resources and/or your income. This

notice does not guarantee aid from or legal representation by them.

 Employees of the United States Bankruptcy Court are not permitted to recommend or refer you to an attorney nor are they

permitted to provide legal advice, including how to complete the bankruptcy forms or which forms may be required in your

bankruptcy case. Basic filing information is available on this Court's website at www.flsb.uscourts.gov.

Clinics for self−represented debtors are conducted regularly. See the Court's website for the date and location of a

clinic near you.

Dated: 2/11/22 FOR THE COURT:

Joseph Falzone, Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

C. Clyde Atkins U.S. Courthouse

301 North Miami Avenue, Ste. 150

Miami, Florida 33128

The clerk shall serve this notice on the Debtor(s).

Case 22-11098-MAM Doc 9 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 1
December 7, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Amendment to Exemption No. 12069 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1218 under Section

333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 regarding sUAS

use.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Regarding: Exemption No. 12069 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1218approved on July 17,

2015.

Joseph Busalacchi seeks to amend this exemption as follows:

1) Additional aircraft.

There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for 

granting the original exemption.

The current exemption is for the following:

1) Aircraft

a. 3D Robotics Aero-M and Y6, ZetaScience FX-79, and the DJI S1000+

We request that the current exemption include the following aircraft. Many of these aircraft have been granted 333 

exemptions by the FAA to other companies. All aircraft are under 55 lbs.

Additional aircraft to be added to the existing exemption and COA

DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire, Roboflight RF70, Precision Hawk Lancaster, Freefly Alta

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an

amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely yours,

Joseph P. Busalacchi

1320 Nancy Drive

Tallahassee, Florida 32301
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 4013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHANDRA PADGETT , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cr
- 00167

- JFA

- 1 )

Submitted : May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ , THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Chandra Padgett , Appellant Pro Se. Tommie DeWayne Pearson , Anne Hunter Young, Assistant United States Attorney s, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chandra Padgett se eks to appeal the district court’s order granting the
Government’s motion in her criminal case . Our review of the district court’s order is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (2012). United States v. Davis , 679 F.3d 190, 193 (4th Cir. 2012). While the stat ute gives us “jurisdiction to hear challenges to the lawfulness of the method used by the district court in making its sentencing decision,” we lack “jurisdiction to review any part of a discretionary sentencing decision.” Id. at 194.
Because the sole is sue Padgett raises on appeal challenges the district court’s discretionary sentencing decision , we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materia ls before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-14-2003

Laverdure v. Montgomery

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket 02-2773

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Laverdure v. Montgomery" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 587.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/587
PRECEDENTIAL

Filed April 14, 2003

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 02-2773

KELLY LAVERDURE,

Appellant

v.

COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY;

MICHAEL D. MARINO

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 01-cv-02542)

District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III

Argued: January 23, 2003

Before: NYGAARD, AMBRO and LOURIE,*

Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: April 2, 2003)

Joseph A. O’Keefe, Esquire (Argued)

O’Keefe & Sher

15019 Kutztown Road

Kutztown, PA 19530

* Honorable Alan D. Lourie, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal

Circuit, sitting by designation. 
John V. Ryan, Esquire

2071 Tulpehocken Road

Wyomissing, PA

Attorneys for Appellant

Joseph J. Santarone, Jr., Esquire

John J. Hare, Esquire (Argued)

Marshall, Dennehey, Warner

Coleman & Goggin

One Montgomery Plaza, 10th Floor

Norristown, PA 19401

Attorneys for Appellee

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge: 

It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above

case filed April 2, 2003, be amended as follows: 

On page 2, line 6 of the caption following the name

“Joseph J Santarone, Jr., Esquire”, delete “(Argued)”, and

insert “(Argued)” instead on the following line immediately

after the name “John J. Hare, Esquire”. 

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro

Circuit Judge

Dated: April 14, 2003

A True Copy:

Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of Knobias, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Key Ramsey, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  March 31, 2006                          By: /s/ E. KEY RAMSEY
                                                  ------------------
                                                  E. Key Ramsey
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Independent Auditor's Consent

The Board of Directors
FNB Bancorp

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-91596, 333-98293, and 222-106363) on Forms S-8 of FNB Bancorp of our report
dated February 28, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FNB
Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of FNB Bancorp.


/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 30, 2004


                                       101
Jeffrey W. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-55

NO. 2017-BA-2125

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

*401Petitioner applied to take the Louisiana Bar Examination. The Committee on Bar Admissions ("Committee") advised petitioner that it could not certify him to take the bar exam on character and fitness grounds. Petitioner then applied to this court for permission to take the bar exam. We granted the application, with the condition that upon petitioner's successful completion of the exam, he apply for the appointment of a commissioner to take character and fitness evidence.

Upon passing the bar exam, and on petitioner's application to this court, we remanded this matter to the Committee on Bar Admissions Panel on Character and Fitness to conduct an investigation and appointed a commissioner to take character and fitness evidence. Following the proceedings, the commissioner filed his report with this court, recommending that petitioner be admitted to the practice of law. Neither party objected to this recommendation.

Considering the commissioner's recommendation and the entire record of this proceeding, we conclude petitioner is eligible to be admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall execute a two-year diagnostic monitoring agreement with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program ("JLAP").

2. The period of this conditional admission shall coincide with the period of petitioner's JLAP agreement. However, petitioner's conditional admission status shall not be terminated until this court so orders.

3. Petitioner shall authorize the Executive Director of JLAP to report any violations of the JLAP agreement to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC").

4. Upon the expiration of the term of petitioner's JLAP agreement, the Executive Director of JLAP shall forward to the ODC (a) a final report of petitioner's progress and participation in JLAP, and (b) a recommendation regarding the need for petitioner's continued participation in JLAP.

5. Following receipt of the report from JLAP, the ODC shall file a report in this court in which it shall recommend whether the conditional admission shall be allowed to terminate or shall be extended.

6. Petitioner shall cooperate with JLAP and the ODC, and shall comply with any and all requirements imposed upon him by JLAP and the ODC.

Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

**CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.**

Hughes, J., would grant admission without conditions.
William Robert LESANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3510

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the
Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: August 10, 2009
Fernando PALOMINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2768

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

Infographics        March 19, 2024        PFAS Fate Transport Diagram

Infographics        October 1, 2023        #ClimateCryptids: Bigfoot

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - Spanish version

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - English Version

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Handout, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Fill-in-the-blank, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Poster, PDF)

Reference Materials        December 11, 2017        All water on Earth in a sphere, placed over a "dry" globe
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Surficial materials map of Connecticut      

      January 1, 1992    

The unconsolidated deposits overlying bedrock in Connecticut range from a few feet to several hundred feet in thickness. These earth materials significantly affect human development of the land. Most of the unconsolidated materials are deposits of continental glaciers that covered all of New England at least twice during the Pleistocene ice age. These glacial deposits are divided into two broad categories, glacial till and glacial stratified deposits. Till, the most widespread glacial deposit, was laid down directly by glacier ice and is characterized by a nonsorted matrix of sand, silt, and clay with variable amounts of stones and large boulders. Glacial meltwater deposits are concentrated in both small and large valleys· and were laid down by glacial meltwater hi streams and lakes in front of the retreating ice margin during deglaciation. These deposits are characterized by layers of well-sorted to poorly sorted gravel, sand, silt, and clay. Postglacial sediments, primarily floodplain alluvium and swamp deposits, make up a lesser proportion of the unconsolidated materials of Connecticut. Alluvium is largely reworked from glacial materials and has similar physical characteristics.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Connecticut

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
Jose ESCORCIA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0364

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.