alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>

EXHIBIT 31.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


I, Robert S. Corrigan, Chief Executive Officer of AcuNetx, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AcuNetx, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

DATE: November 19, 2008
                                             /s/ Robert S. Corrigan
                                             -------------------------
                                                 Robert S. Corrigan,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Christine King, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMIS Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2004

/s/ CHRISTINE KING

Christine King
Chief Executive Officer and President
STATE EX. REL. Deontay D. HARDY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0843

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Denied.
## Appendix V to 40 CFR Part 51

— Criteria for Determining the Completeness of Plan Submissions

Technical Support Document

Criterion Status

(a) Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. All Pollutants

(b) Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected areas(s). Affected sources are located in Knox County

. Knox County is currently designated as “non attainment” for the 1997 and 2006 PM 2.5 standard and either “attainment” or “unclassifiable/attainment” for all other National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

(c) Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between

certain baseline levels and allowable emission s anticipated as a result of the revision. N/A

(d) The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. For all requests to redesignate an area to attainment for a national primary ambient air quality standard, under section 107 of the Act, a revision must be submitted to provide for the maintenance of the national primary ambient air quality standards for at least 10 years as required by section 175A of the Act. N/A

(e) Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, justification of model sel ections, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. N/A

(f) Evide nce, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. N/A

(g) Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensu re emission levels. N/A

(h) Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. N/A

(i) Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies, or an explanation of why such justifications are not necessary. N/A
Israel BARNES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jennifer BARNES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2967

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Curtis Ray MCCARTY, Jr. v. Arthur WOOD, III

2016-CT-00928-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 29, 2018 Closed: August 2, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Aron RODRIGUEZ-VILLASANA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Banco Bradesco S.A.  December 31, 2014  List of the Main Subsidiaries


Exhibit 8.1Subsidiary

   Jurisdiction of Incorporation

   Names Under which Business isConducted1

   Banco Alvorada S.A

   Salvador - BA – Brazil

   Banco Alvorada2

   Banco Bradesco BBI S.A.

   Osasco - SP - Brazil

   Bradesco BBI3

   Banco Boavista Interatlântico S.A.

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Boavista4

   Banco Bradesco Argentina S.A.

   Buenos Aires – Argentina

   Bradesco Argentina5

   Banco Bradesco Europa S.A.

   Luxembourg – G. Ducado

   Bradesco LuxembourgLuxembourg6

   Banco Bradesco S.A. Grand Cayman Branch

   Cayman Islands

   Bradesco Grand Cayman Branch7

   Banco Bradesco New York Branch

   New York – EUA

   Bradesco New York Branch8

   Banco Bradesco Financiamentos S.A.

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Bradesco Financiamentos9

   Bradesco Argentina de Seguros S.A

   Buenos Aires – Argentina

   Bradesco Argentina de Seguros10

   Bradesco Auto/RE Companhia de Seguros

   Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

   Bradesco Auto/RE11

   Bradesco Capitalização S.A.

   São Paulo - Brazil

   Bradesco Capitalização12

   Bradesco Administradora de Consórcios Ltda.

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Bradesco Consórcios13

   Bradesco Leasing S.A. Arrendamento Mercantil

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Bradesco Leasing14

   Bradesco S.A. Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários

   São Paulo – Brazil

   Bradesco Corretora15

   Bradesco Saúde S.A.

   Rio de Janeiro – Brazil

   Bradesco Saúde16

   Bradesco Securities, Inc.

   New York – USA

   Bradesco Securities17

   Bradesco Seguros S.A.

   São Paulo – Brazil

   Bradesco Seguros18

   Bradesco Vida e Previdência S.A.

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Bradesco Previdência19

   Bradescor Corretora de Seguros Ltda.

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Bradescor20

   BRAM – Bradesco Asset Management S.A. DTVM

   São Paulo – Brazil

   BRAM21

   Cia. Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros Rubi

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   Rubi22

   Atlântica Companhia de Seguros

   Rio de Janeiro – Brazil

   Atlântica Seguros23

   União Participações Ltda.

   Osasco – SP - Brazil

   União24

   Bradesplan Participações Ltda.

   Osasco - SP – Brazil

   Bradesplan25

   Banco Bradesco Cartões S.A.

   Osasco - SP – Brazil

   Bradesco Cartões26

   Tempo Serviços Ltda.

   Uberlândia – MG – Brazil

   Tempo Serviços27

   Banco CBSS S.A.

   Barueri - SP – Brazil

   CBSS28

   Bradseg Participações S.A.

   Osasco - SP – Brazil

   Bradseg29

   Banco Bradescard S.A.

   São Paulo – Brazil

   Banco Bradescard30

   Ágora Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A.

   Rio de janeiro – Brazil

   Ágora31

   Odontoprev S.A.

   Barueri - SP – Brazil

   Odontoprev32

   Banco Bradesco BERJ S.A.

   Rio de janeiro – Brazil

   BERJ
Jeffrey David KELLY and Miguel Aguila, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel JUNIOR, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1044 3D18-1046

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Dexter DEERING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3222

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
RCRA CLUSTERS XVIII, XIX and XX REVISED AUTHORIZATION 

APPLICATION 

INTRODUCTION 

The approach ofthis Revised Authorization Application for RCRA Clusters XVIII, XIX 

and XX, requesting authority for all federal delegable ha7.ardous waste regulations 

promulgated from July I, 2007 to July I, 2010, will be to address updated documents and 

any changes in the Addendum to Program Description for RCRA Clusters XVI and XVII, 

(Appendix II), Any documents that have changed have been included and others that 

have been cited and have not changed have not been included as they have been 

previously submitted. Added to this Revised Authorization Application are Regulatory 

Summaries affinal federal hazardous waste regulations promulgated from 7/1107 to 

711110 for RCRA Clusters XVIII, XIX and XX, (Appendix XI), which have been 

adopted by reference into the Idaho Rules and Standards for Hazardous Waste, 

(Appendix XII), The two substantive rules in these regulatory summaries include 

Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste Rule dated 10/30/08 and the Academics Labs 

Rule dated 12/1/08. As notifications are received from Idaho hazardous waste generators 

to implement these rules, Idaho DEQ will work with these generators to ensure 

compliance with all regulatory aspects ofthese ruIes, (The Hazardous Waste Program 

Summary, dated April 2000 and submitted in April 2001 for the purpose ofbackground 

information, and the Idaho Hazardous Waste Facility Siting Act. submitted in September 

of2002, have not changed and have not been submitted with this application, The 

Hazardous Waste Management Act, (Appendix XIII), and the Idaho Environmental 

Protection and Health Act, (Appendix XIV), have both been included v,ith the Idaho 

Code 2010 Cumulative Pocket Supplement (CPS) as well as the 2010 printing of the 

Idaho Public Records Act, (Appendix XV), since these statutes have been referenced in 

the Attorney General's Statement signed 10/14/11, (Appendix J). 

This Revised Authorization Application has been developed with respect to regulations 

found in Title 40, Parts 271.6 and 271.21, Code of Federal Regulation, The Attorney 

General's Statement, signed 10/14/11, (Appendix I), has been revised to support the 

regulatory equivalency and consistency for all federal delegable regulations promUlgated 

as ofJuly 1,2010. The current, RCRA Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA), signed 

8/2/01, (Appendix V), has not been substantively changed, however, clarifications in the 

document flow dated 8/30/10 and 3/3111 were agreed to by EPA Region 10 and IDEQ 

and have been included in (Appendix VI), This MOA remains in force and is included 

since it is such an important supportive document for the Addendum to the Program 

Description and the Revised Authorization Application, The RCRA Data Management 

Letter of Agreement has also been included in (Appendix VII),
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CALVIN RICO ROSEMOND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-02-435)

Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 2, 2004

Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Rico Rosemond, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Rico Rosemond appeals the district court’s margin

order denying his motion for discovery. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United

States v. Rosemond, No. CR-02-435 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 5, 2004 &

entered Apr. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-3118]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 9834]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0603 FRL-8114-9]


2-Propenoic Acid, Methyl Ester, Polymer with Ethenyl Acetate, 
Hydrolyzed, Sodium Salts; Tolerance Exemption

Correction

    In rule document E7-3118 beginning on page 8913 in the issue of 
Wednesday, February 28, 2007, make the following correction:


Sec.  180.960  [Corrected]

    On page 8916, in the second column, in Sec.  180.960, immediately 
following the section heading, insert five stars before the table.

[FR Doc. Z7-3118 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 33447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPPTS-42205B; FRL-5798-3]


Enforceable Consent Agreement Development for Methyl Isobutyl 
Ketone (MIBK); Solicitation of Interested Parties and Notice of Public 
Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 98-15856, beginning on page 32656, in the issue 
of Monday, June 15, 1998, in the DATES section, in the fourth line, 
``July 6, 1998'' should be added following ``before''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Robert D. RICHTER, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 12.3  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Malcolm Ritchie, as Chief
Executive Officer of United Biscuits Finance plc and Regentrealm Limited, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)   the accompanying Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the 53 week period ended January 3, 2004 as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; as amended; and  (2)   the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the company.   By:
  Malcolm
  Ritchie /s/Chief Executive Officer  Date:    March
30, 2004   A signed original copy of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to United Biscuits
Finance plc and will be retained by United Biscuits Finance plc and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Biocrust biocrusts ClimateChange Climate albedo ColoradoPlateau Drylands

Filters

              - multimedia_image(10)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - utah(12)

## By Year

Photography        September 29, 2016        Biocrust

Photography        September 26, 2016        Biocrust outdoor testing plots

Photography        September 26, 2016        Biocrust outdoor testing plots

Photography        September 26, 2016        Biocrust outdoor testing plots.

Photography        September 29, 2016        Footprint damage to biocrusts

Photography        September 29, 2016        Dark-colored mature biocrust

Photography        September 26, 2016        Biocrusts provide soil stability and prevent erosion

Photography        September 26, 2016        USGS scientist Sasha Reed studys outdoor biocrust testing sites

Photography        September 29, 2016        USGS scientist Jayne Belnap examines instruments to measure biocrust

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Changing Temperatures and Precipitation May Affect Drylands

National News Release        March 15, 2017        Changing Temperatures and Precipitation May Affect Living Skin of Drylands

Photography        September 29, 2016        View from Canyonlands Research Center
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Robert E. Spencer, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer and Elizabeth T. Beale, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, do each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This 27thday of March, 2006.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Robert E. Spencer, Jr.
|Robert E. Spencer, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|/s/ Elizabeth T. Beale    
|Elizabeth T. Beale        
|Chief Financial Officer   



48