alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

**DoverDowns Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Dover DownsGaming & Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Denis McGlynn, President and Chief Executive Officer and Directorof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 7,  2008    |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
| /s/ Denis McGlynn             |   |
| Denis McGlynn                 |   |
| President and Chief Executive |   |
| Officer and Director          |   |

 

         This certification shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filingunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except asshall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

 

 

 

----
Termination Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.80 
 Termination Agreement 
 This Agreement is executed on January 16, 2006 by and among: 
 Party A: Lahiji Vale Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”) 
 Registered Address: P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporation Centre, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands 
 Party B: Wang Xiu Ling
(hereinafter referred to as “Party B”) 
 Address: No.101, Unit 3, Building 7, Wu Sheng Bystreet (E), Chaoyang District, Beijing 
 Party C: Beijing Lei Ting Wan Jun Network Technology Company Limited 
 Address: Room 610, Unit C, No.18 of Xi Huan Road (S), Economic-Technological Development Area, Beijing 
 Whereas: 
  

	1.	Party A, Party B and Party C executed an Exclusive Purchase Right Contract (hereinafter referred to as the “Exclusive Purchase Right Contract”) with respect to the equity
interest held by Party B in Party C on January 19, 2005. 

  

	2.	Party A, Party B and Party C wish to terminate the said Exclusive Purchase Right Contract. 

 Now therefore, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract, which shall automatically become invalid upon the effective date of this agreement.


  

	2.	On the date when the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract becomes invalid, the rights and obligations of Party A and Party B under the Exclusive Purchase Right Contract shall be
terminated accordingly. 

  

	3.	This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution. 

  

	4.	This Agreement shall be governed by the PRC laws. 

  

	5.	This Agreement is made in three copies, each held by either Party. 

  

 1 









			
	[Execution Page]
	
	Lahiji Vale Limited
		
	Name:	 	Wang Lei Lei
	Title:	 	Legal Representative
	
	Wang Xiu Ling
		
	Signature:	 	
	
	Beijing Lei Ting Wan Jun Network Technology Company Limited
		
	Name:	 	Wang Lei Lei
	Title:	 	Legal Representative

  

 2
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00411-CV

T.B., Appellant

V.

B.B., Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 16th District Court

of Denton County (22-4175-16)

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s 

judgment is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. We affirm the 

divorce grant but reverse the cruelty finding. We also reverse the trial court’s division 

of the marital estate, including all community property and debts, and we reverse all 

provisions regarding the Marton Precision Manufacturing, LLC stock. We modify the 

money judgment awarded to Mother from $504,754.64 to $455,230.19. We affirm the 
remainder of the Final Decree and remand the case for a limited new trial solely on 

the issues of (1) the ground(s) for divorce and (2) a just and right division of the 

marital estate.

It is further ordered that each party shall bear their own costs of this appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Anthony J. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0475

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
SERVED: April6, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ._ ... , 

In The Matter Of: 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4262 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2012S0700099 

Respondent 

ERRATUM ORDER 

On AprilS, 2016, an Order Granting the Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time and 

Directing/Reserving. Other Relief was filed ("Order"). 

The next day, on April6, 2016, the Respondent informally contacted the Office of 

Hearings by telephone an4 pointed out a clerical error in the Order's Docket Number. The 

telephone call was made by a staff member in the Frost Brown Todd LLC law firm. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(6), and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, 

regulations, statutory authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

I. The AprilS, 2016 Order Granting the Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time and 

Directing/Reserving Other Relief is corrected as follows: 

Page 

1 

Line 

6 

Attachment: Service List 

Reads Corrected 

FAA-2015-4262 FAA-2016-4262 
Docket No. FAA~2016~4262 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL. 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI0001 

Ms. Andrea Michelle Harper 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Paul Alp 

Respondent's Counsel 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004 

TEL: · 202-624-2500 

FAX: 202-628-5116 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590. 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Winston E. Miller 

Respondent~ Counsel 

Frost, Brown, Todd, LLC 

400 Market Street, 32nd Floor 

Louisville, KY 40202-3363 

TEL: 502-589-0296 

FAX: 502-581-1087 

Ms. Meaghan G. Byrd 

Respondent's Counsel 

Alston & Byrd LLP 

One Atlantic Center 

1201 W. Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, GA 30309-3424 

TEL: 404-881-7245 

FAX: 404-253-8510 

1 Service was by U.S. Mall. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

Page 2 ofS
EX PARTE R.D.B.

1160652 (CR-15-1479)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Kevin COOLIDGE v. Austin BUTLER, dba Austin's Auto Salvage

NO. 2018-C-0313

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 2018

Granted. See Order Attached.

Attachment

**SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA**

No. **2018-C-0313**

**KEVIN COOLEDGE**

**VERSUS**

**AUSTIN BUTLER, DBA AUSTIN'S AUTO SALVAGE**

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review

Office of Workers' Compensation,

No. 14-04586, District 1E;

Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 16-937.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal *1287send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 18th day of April, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand-Eighteen,

John Tarlton Olivier Clerk of Court
John James LOVELY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Nikole M. MASTERS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2936

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Engil YESIL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Samer TAWFIK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0503

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 2 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 3 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 4 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 5 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 6 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 7 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 8 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 9 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 10 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 11 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 12 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 13 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 14 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 15 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 16 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 17 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 18 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 19 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 20 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 21 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 22 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 23 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 24 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 25 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 26 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 27 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 28 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 29 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 30 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 31 of 32
Case 1:10-cv-00006 Document 18 Filed 07/27/10 Page 32 of 32
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 47 (Wednesday, March 11, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 11954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

 [REG-209682-94]
RIN 1545-AS39


Adjustments Following Sales of Partnership Interests

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-1949, beginning on page 4408, in the 
issue of Thursday, January 29, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 1.743-1  [Corrected]

    On page 4419, in the table, in ``Assets'', in the fourth column 
under ``Basis adjustment'', the total ``4,000.00'' should read 
``3,000.00''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John D.  Aquilino,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of POP3 MEDIA CORP on Form  10-QSB for the three  months  ended  December
31,2004 fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial
condition and results of operations of POP3 MEDIA CORP.

Dated:   February 14, 2005         By: /s/ John D. Aquilino
                                       ---------------------------------
                                           John D. Aquilino
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to POP3  MEDIA  CORP  and  will be  retained  by POP3  MEDIA  CORP and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - (-)other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

About        February 5, 2024        California's History of Large Storms & Floods

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management

About        May 21, 2020        History of the NWQP and Its Programs

About        May 21, 2020        What We Do
Raul Alejandro SALAZAR, Appellant, v. Alma Rosa MARTINEZ f/k/a Alma Rosa Salazar, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1629

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Eric Lloyd IRVING, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ARNOLD'S AUTO AND MARINE REPAIR, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0870

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
The TJX COMPANIES, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Martha ALLEGUE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5150 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, as the ‘‘Leonard 

Montalto Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2016 

Mr. DONOVAN (for himself, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. ISRAEL, 

Miss RICE of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MENG, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. CAROLYN B. 

MALONEY of New York, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. 

LOWEY, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. 

TONKO, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. HANNA, Mr. REED, Mr. KATKO, Ms. 

SLAUGHTER, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. COLLINS of New York, and Mr. CROWLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, 

New York, as the ‘‘Leonard Montalto Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEONARD MONTALTO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3031 Veterans Road West in 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5150 IH

1 Staten Island, New York, shall be known and designated 

2 as the ‘‘Leonard Montalto Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Leonard Montalto 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk 

AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Room 2W1000 

Case# 2013NM7300043 

May26, 2014 

To Whom It May Concern: 

RECEIVED 

MAY 2 9 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

On May 16, 2014 I received a final notice of civil penalty from the U.S. Department of 

Transportation Federal Aviation Administration to our address 12661 Tanada Cir 

Anchorage AK, 99515. The letter I received was first sent to our old address in 

Seattle Washington. The first Letter the FAA sent we never received. 

On February 20th 2012 I shipped a 16 piece non bulk shipment from Anchorage, 

Alaska to Seattle, Washington. I was unaware that there was hazardous items 

packed inside the moving containers as I was not the person who packed them, my 

husband was. We did not communicated to each other about what was inside of the 

containers. I had flown up to Alaska that day to get everything out of storage and 

ship it on Alaska Airlines to our new home in Seattle. 

I am writing to request a hearing on my behalf for Case No. 2013NM7300043. Please 

use this letter as a record of my response to the certified letter delivered to me on 

May 16, 2014. 

Thank you kindly for your time. 

Sincerely, 

Christine Cloud
(106 So. 781)

No. 25312.

#### SINGLETON v. ROGERS.

(Jan. 4, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Divorce <&wkey;i36—Occupying different rooms in same domicile not “living separate and apart” . within statute.

Where husband and wife since marriage continuously occupied the matrimonial domicile, which was a small house of two rooms, one occupied by husband and the other by the wife, there was no “living separate and apart” within Act No. 269 of 1916, authorizing divorce where parties lived separate and apart for seven years.

[Ed. Note.—For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Live Apart.)

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Percy Saint, Judge.

Suit for divorce by George Singleton against Hattie Rogers. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

J. A. Morales, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Paul A. Sompayrac, of New Orleans, for appellee.

ROGERS, J.

The parties to this litigation are an aged couple, who were married in July, 1901. In March, 1921, plaintiff brought this suit for a divorce under the provisions of Act 269 of 1916. The court below rejected plaintiff’s demand; and he has appealed to this court to revise the judgment.

*197Plaintiff’s action is founded upon tlie allegation that in the year 1903 defendant abandoned the conjugal domicile, and that they have been living separate and apart from each other for seven years or more. The evidence adduced on the trial of the case, however, affirmatively shows that the parties have since their marriage continuously occupied the matrimonial domicile. At the time of the institution of this suit, this domicile was a small house, consisting of two rooms, situated in the city of New Orleans. One of the rooms was occupied by plaintiff and the other room was occupied by defendant.

The case falls within the principle announced by this court in Hava v. Chavigny, 147 La. 331, 84 So. 892, in which it was held that the living separate and apart referred to in Act 269 of 1916 is the life which is manifest in the community in which the spouses live, and that the evidence thereof is not to be sought behind the closed doors of the matrimonial domicile. This construction of the statute was approved and followed in Arnoult v. Letten, 155 La. 275, 99 So. 218. See, also, to the same effect, Quinn v. Brown, 159 La. 570, 105 So. 624.

Judgment affirmed.
|EXHIBIT 13.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, XIE Weizhi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 1, 2014
|-------------------



|By:   /s/   XIE Weizhi         | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: XIE Weizhi              
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
Eric D. DOBSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-0946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.