alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Paul W. Boyd, certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IdleAire Technologies Corporation (the
Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company is made known to us by others within the Company,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and
the audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: April 2, 2007
    /s/ Paul W. BoydPaul W. BoydChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Case 22-12790-EPK Doc 106-2 Filed 05/24/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 22-12790-EPK Doc 106-2 Filed 05/24/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 22-12790-EPK Doc 106-2 Filed 05/24/22 Page 3 of 3
Peter L. ROSENBERG and Sally L. Rosenberg, Appellants, v. Ed MOFFATT and Eric Moffatt, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2114

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 1884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10112]



Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 7/Monday, January 12, 1998/
Corrections

[[Page 1884]]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Correction

    In notice document 98-42 beginning on page 275, in the issue of 
Monday, January 5, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 276, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, in 
the sixth line from the bottom, insert ``each year. The staff also 
estimates that the average number of hours necessary for compliance 
with the Rule 11Aa3-2'' after ``Rule 11Aa3-2''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Raymond ROGERS, DOC #551259, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Anthony SELVESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - (-)new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper
**Exhibit 12.1** **Mediacom    Broadband LLC** **Schedule of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    and Preferred Dividends**                        **For the Years Ended December 31,**   **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**  **2002**   **(In thousands, except ratio amounts)**  Earnings:                        Income (loss) before income taxes         $    (15,238    )     $    11,003      $    34,852      $    10,082      $    (27,244    )Interest expense, net          109,869       97,282       86,125       82,536       76,790 Amortization of capitalized    interest          962       821       695       503       114 Amortization of debt issuance costs          2,622       4,600       2,099       2,365       2,248 Interest component of rent    expense(1)          2,803       2,289       2,137       2,086       1,687                      Earnings available for fixed    charges         $    101,018      $    115,995      $    125,908      $    97,572      $    53,595                      Fixed Charges:                        Interest expense, net         $    109,869      $    97,282      $    86,125      $    82,536      $    76,790 Capitalized interest          1,675       1,558       1,270       3,425       4,056 Amortization of debt issuance costs          2,622       4,600       2,099       2,365       2,248 Interest component of rent    expense(1)          2,803       2,289       2,137       2,086       1,687 Preferred dividends          18,000       18,000       18,000       18,000       18,000                      Total fixed charges         $    134,969      $    123,729      $    109,631      $    108,412      $    102,781                      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges    and preferred dividends          —       —       1.15       —       —                      Deficiency of earnings over fixed    charges         $    (33,951    )     $    (7,734    )     $    —      $    (10,840    )     $    (49,186    )                           (1)     A reasonable approximation (one-third) is deemed to be the    interest factor included in rental expense.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

TED & STAN’S TOWING SERVICES, INC.,

Debtor. /

TED & STAN’S TOWING SERVICES, INC.,

 Plaintiff

v.

Case No.: 21-10663-AJC

Chapter 11 

Adv. Case No.

21-01093-AJC

Tokyo Century (USA); Eastern Funding, LLC;

Agentis PLLC; Greenlight Premium Finance Co.

Impact Staff Leasing, Inc.

Defendants

______________________________________/

AGREED ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING 

VERIFIED EXPEDITED MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

THIS CAUSE came on before the Court 3/25/21 at 2:00 PM on notice of hearing upon the 

Debtors’ Motion; and the Court finding that would be in the best interest of the estate, and 

creditors, and no objections being raised, it is

ORDERED THAT Tokyo Century (USA) and Eastern Funding, LLC having agreed to a 

temporary stay for 60 days or until May 23, 2021, the motion is granted, and said defendants do not 

have to plead to the adversary case at this time.

ORDERED THAT for 60 days or until May 23, 2021, or pending further order of this Court, all 

defendants shall take no action in state court adverse to Edwyn Martinez, President of Debtor, 

while he continues to try and confirm a plan of reorganization.

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 30, 2021.

Case 21-01093-AJC Doc 9 Filed 03/31/21 Page 1 of 2
As to defendants who have not yet appeared in this case this order is conditionally granted, 

and those defendants Agentis PLLC; Greenlight Premium Finance Co. and Impact Staff Leasing, 

Inc. may file objections or requests for hearing if they disagree with the 60 day temporary stay.

###

Submitted by: Joel M. Aresty who will serve copies

Case 21-01093-AJC Doc 9 Filed 03/31/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hotels.com (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending May 15, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David S. Litman,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:
     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
 /s/ David S. Litman
 David S. Litman
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |                 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright
|Name:                |  | Carole R. Wright
|Date:                |  | May 13, 2010
Jethro M. BUBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00773-CV

ULISES MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

PCA ACQUISITIONS V, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-38627

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed October 5, 2023. The notice of appeal 

was filed October 20, 2023. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid 

the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil 

cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. 

Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs). Moreover, no clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the 

court appellant had not paid for the record, and there is otherwise no indication 
2

appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record. 

On November 6, 2023, appellant was instructed to pay the appellate filing fee

on or before November 16, 2023 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without 

further notice. In addition, on December 5, 2023, notification was transmitted to 

appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, 

within fifteen days, appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided 

this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not 

provide any response to any of those notices.

On December 28, 2023, appellant was ordered to pay the filing fee and 

demonstrate he had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before 

January 8, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). In the order, the court notified appellant 

that failure to comply with either of those requirements would leave the appeal 

subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution.

Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee, he has not provided this court 

with proof of payment for the record, nor has he otherwise responded to the court’s 

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
Damian Terell BUSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay impact structure

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileJ. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Alexis Cruzata Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DECLARATION REGARDING PAYMENT ADVICES

Debtor:

 Copies of all payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the debtor from any employer within 60

days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior,

attach copies of any and all received and provide explanation that you didn't work the full 60 days.

)

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor had no income from any employer during the 60 days

prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor:

 receives disability payments

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation

 receives Social Security payments

 receives a pension

 does not work outside the home

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the debtor is unable to timely provide some or all copies of payment advices or

other evidence of payment received

Explain: 

Joint Debtor (if applicable):

 Copies of payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the joint debtor from any employer within 60

days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior,

attach copies of any and all received and provide explanation that you didn't work the full 60 days.

)

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor had no income from any employer during the 60 days

prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor:

 receives disability payments

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation

 receives Social Security payments

 receives a pension

 does not work outside the home

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the joint debtor is unable to timely provide some or all copies of payment

advices or other evidence of payment received

Explain: 

LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 1 of 2

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 6 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 2
NOTE: When submitting copies of evidence of payment such as pay stubs or payment advices, it is your responsibility to redact

(blackout) any social security numbers, names of minor children, dates of birth or financial account numbers before attaching for

filing with the court. See Local Rule 5005-1(A)(2).

/s/ Alexis Cruzata Date: August 2, 2021

Alexis Cruzata

Signature of Attorney or Debtor

LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 2 of 2

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 6 Filed 08/02/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay impact structure

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - (-)district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(7)
              - new jersey(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(22)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!
EXHIBIT  32.1

                              BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Moon Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Muzio, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  MICHAEL MUZIO
------------------
Michael Muzio
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
August 19, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5420 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5420

   To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to acquire, 
  operate, and maintain the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial in Marne-la-
                           Coquette, France.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2016

Mr. Miller of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to acquire, 
  operate, and maintain the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial in Marne-la-
                           Coquette, France.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAFAYETTE ESCADRILLE MEMORIAL IN MARNE-LA-COQUETTE, FRANCE.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the American Battle 
Monuments Commission (hereinafter referred to as ``the Commission'') 
may acquire, operate, and maintain the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial in 
Marne-la-Coquette, France.
    (b) Agreement Required.--The Commission may carry out subsection 
(a) only pursuant to an agreement--
            (1) between the Commission and the Lafayette Escadrille 
        Memorial Foundation; and
            (2) subject to the consent of the Government of France.
    (c) Payment of Expenses.--The Commission may employ such personnel 
as are necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
4266297-6 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO.: 09-34791-BKC-RBR 

ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.,1 CHAPTER 11 

 Debtor. 

____________________________________/ 

CERTIFICATE OF NO RESPONSE AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

APPROVING AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN THE CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE AND ROGER STONE AND DRAKE 

VENTURES, LLC 

Herbert Stettin (“Stettin” or “Trustee”), the Chapter 11 Trustee of Rothstein Rosenfeldt 

Alder, P.A. (“RRA” or “Debtor”), filed the Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement Between 

the Chapter 11 Trustee and Roger Stone and Drake Ventures, LLC [D.E. #4063] on March 15, 

2013, pursuant to Local Rule 9013-1(D) (the “Settlement Motion”). The Trustee represents as 

follows: 

 1. The Settlement Motion and proposed order were timely served on all interested 

parties pursuant to the referenced rule as shown on the certificate of service previously filed with 

the Settlement Motion. 

2. The Settlement Motion contained the bulletin required by the referenced rule. 

3. The deadline for responses to the Settlement Motion was April 5, 2013. 

 

1 The address and last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the Debtor, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 

P.A., is 6600 NW 16th Street, Suite 11, Plantation, FL 33313 (TIN 7961). 

Case 09-34791-RAM Doc 4222 Filed 04/09/13 Page 1 of 2
4266297-6 2

4. No objections to or requests for hearing on the motion have been received, and as 

of April 9, 2013, a check of the electronic entries docketed in this case confirms that no 

objections to or requests for hearing on the Settlement Motion have been filed. 

WHEREFORE, the Trustee seeks the entry an order, in the form which accompanies 

this certificate, granting the requested relief. 

Dated: April 9, 2013. Respectfully submitted, 

 BERGER SINGERMAN LLP 

Attorneys for the Trustee, Herbert Stettin 

Berger Singerman LLP 

350 East Las Olas Blvd. 

Suite 1000 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Main Line: (954) 525-9900 

Facsimile: (954) 523-2872 

By: /s/ Charles H. Lichtman 

Charles H. Lichtman 

Fla. Bar No. 501050 

clichtman@bergersingerman.com 

Case 09-34791-RAM Doc 4222 Filed 04/09/13 Page 2 of 2
Ronald Carl BURCHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 22, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.