alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      12**

**NDS      GROUP PLC**

**COMPUTATION      OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

|                                                                     |   | **For                  the nine months ended March 31,** |    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------|
|                                                                          |   | **2007**                                                 |    | **2006** |   |
|                                                                     |   | **(Unaudited)**                                          |    | **(Unaudited)** |   |
| (in                  thousands, except ratio)                            |   |                                                     |    |   |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                     |    |   |   |
| Consolidated                  pretax income from continuing operations   |   | $                                                        | 136,450 |   | $ | 115,918 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                     |    |   |   |   |   |
| Interest                  portion of rental expense                      |   |                                                     | 4,557   |   |   | 4,169 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                     |    |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings                                                                 |   | $                                                        | 141,007 |   | $ | 120,087 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                     |    |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed                  charges, being interest portion of rental expense |   | $                                                        | 4,557   |   | $ | 4,169 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                     |    |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio                  of earnings to fixed charges                      |   |                                                     | 30.9    |   |   | 28.8 |   |

----
nptn_Ex10_6



		

			EXHIBIT 10.6

		





		
			 
		

		
			2017 Target Bonus Program
		

		
			On May 2, 2017, the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of NeoPhotonics Corporation (the “Company”) approved a 2017 performance bonus program (the “2017 Bonus Program”) for the Company’s executive officers and other employees. The Compensation Committee structured target bonuses for the fiscal year 2017 so that payouts would be determined based in part on achievement against corporate objectives, including:
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Non-GAAP net income from operations for the fiscal year 2017; and




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 ·
			

			
	
			
			Completion of research and development product milestones in fiscal year 2017.




		
			For target bonuses for the fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee established performance goals for each of the above metrics that are aligned with corporate objectives. While these various performance goals were selected, they are merely non-binding guidelines to be used as one factor in determining the actual bonuses earned.
		

		
			The Compensation Committee may in its discretion award up to fifty percent (50%) of the final earned 2017 bonuses to senior management and U.S. director level employees in the form of restricted stock units.
		

		
			It is expected that, in the first quarter of 2018, the Compensation Committee will review the Company’s fiscal year 2017 corporate performance against each of the corporate goals and other aspects of corporate and individual performance to determine any actual bonus awards for performance related to the fiscal year 2017.
		

		
			Target bonus percentages for the Company’s “named executive officers” for the prior year’s (2016) bonus program were established by the Compensation Committee in June 2016, as previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2016.  It is expected that the Compensation Committee will review these target bonus percentages later in 2017 to evaluate whether they should be modified for the 2017 Bonus Program.
Drinel JOSEPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3523

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         47,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,652
<CGS>                                         (34,150)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (34,150)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,214)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (4)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (692)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,178
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,178
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 14.2
 IDLEAIRE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
 CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
FOR
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    1. Director Responsibilities
   
    
    Attend and participate in board and committee meetings.Personal
participation is required. Directors may not vote or participate by proxy.
    
    Remain properly informed about the corporations business and affairs.
Directorsshould review and devote appropriate time to studying board materials.
    
    Rely on others.Absent knowledge that makes reliance unwarranted, directors
may rely on board committees, management, employees, and professional advisors.
    
    Make inquiries.Directors should make inquiries about potential problems that
come to their attention and follow up until they are reasonably satisfied that
management is addressing them appropriately.




---



##### 



IdleAire Technologies Corporation 
Board Code of Ethics (4/06)
    
    2
 2. Conflict of Interest
  1
  
    
    Relationship of Company with third-parties.Directors may not engage in any
conduct or activities that are inconsistent with the Companys best interests or that
disrupt or impair the Companys relationship with any person or entity with which the
Company has or proposes to enter into a business or contractual relationship.
    
    Compensation from non-Company sources.Directors may not accept compensation (in
any form) for services performed for the Company from any source other than the Company.
    
    Gifts.Directors and members of their families may not accept gifts from
persons or entities who deal with the Company in those cases where any such gift has
more than a nominal value or where acceptance of the gifts could create the appearance
of a conflict of interest.
    
    Personal use of Company assets.Directors may not use Company assets, labor or
information for personal use unless approved by the Chair of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee or as part of a compensation or expense reimbursement
program available to all directors.
    
    Financial Matters.Directors and members of their immediate family may not
accept any loans from the Company nor guarantees by the Company of any obligations of
the Directors or such immediate family members.
 3. Corporate Opportunities
 provided, however,
 4. Confidentiality




---



##### 



IdleAire Technologies Corporation 
Board Code of Ethics (4/06)
    
    3
 5. Compliance with laws, rules and regulations; fair dealing
   6. Encouraging the reporting of any illegal or unethical behavior
  Compliance Procedures
  8. Company Assets
  9. Media Relations
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

12862

Vol. 63, No. 50

Monday, March 16, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 231

[DFARS Case 97-D313]

Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement; Restructuring

Costs

Correction

In rule document 98–3714 beginning

on page 7308, in the issue of Friday,

February 13, 1998, make the following

correction:

231.205-70 [Corrected]

On page 7309, in the third column, in

231.205-70(b)(4), in the sixth line, after

‘‘employees’’ insert ‘‘early retirement

incentive payments for employees,’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. 29147, Amdt. No. 25-94]

Transport Category Airplanes,

Technical Amendments and Other

Miscellaneous Corrections

Correction

In rule document 98–4162 beginning

on page 8847 in the issue of Monday,

February 23, 1998 make the following

correction:

§ 25.807 [Corrected]

On page 8848, in the third column, in

§ 25.807(f)(4), in the last line ‘‘nearest

edges’’ should read ‘‘nearest exit edges’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, the trustee (the "Trustee") in respect of the Trust
Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-4, hereby certifies to Bear Stearns Depositor
Inc. as follows:

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K
filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as Trustee for the Trust
Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-4 Trust and any distribution reports filed in
respect of the Trust during the 2003 calendar year;

2. The information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, no misleading as of the last day of the period covered by
the annual report;

3. The distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the
depositor by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these
reports is included in such reports; and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under
the trust agreement and except as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee has
fulfilled its obligations under the trust agreement.

                              U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL
                              ASSOCIATION



                              By: /s/ Beverly A. Freeney for Adam K. Berman
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Adam K. Berman
                                  Title: Assistant Vice President
                                  Date:  March 24, 2004


                                       7
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00141-CV

Marilyn STEWART,

Appellant

v.

WARREN PROPERTIES, INC., Agent for Vineyard Garden Apartments,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 9, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 383509

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment 

of possession. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

We order no costs of appeal taxed against appellant because she qualifies as an indigent 

under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1.

SIGNED February 5, 2014.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Nafia Sevin Ergun SEFADA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ELSAJA MIAMI, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2630

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

                              BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADPOTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual report of BLUE MOON GROUP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Muzio, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, an
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company


/s/ MICHAEL MUZIO
-----------------
Michael Muzio
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
May 17, 2004
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00116-CR

IN RE JIMMY W. TANKSLEY

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 26, 2020, the Court received a document from Jimmy W. Tanksley. 

Tanksley is an inmate. The document is labeled as a petition for a writ of mandamus. 

Tanksley seeks a writ from this Court to compel the production of documents from “the 

Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice and TDCJ Parole Division” related to a 

“warrant/Detainer #12-22-2017-03217712.” 

From the content of the petition, although we are unable to determine what the 

warrant/detainer referred to is or what documents Tanksley wants produced to him, it 

is clear that we do not have jurisdiction of this proceeding.

This Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and can issue writs of mandamus 

against entities, other than certain judges, only to preserve our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV'T 
In re Tanksley Page 2

CODE ANN. § 22.221(a). That is not the nature of the writ sought by Tanksley. 

Accordingly, because we have no jurisdiction of this proceeding, it is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Pet. dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 8, 2020

Do not publish 

[OT06]
Mitchell Wendell HENDRIX, Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-518

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plastipak
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended November 1, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael J. Plotzke, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that based on my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Michael J. Plotzke
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Michael J. Plotzke
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            Plastipak Holdings, Inc.
                                            January 28, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management

Satellite imagery        December 4, 2015        Titan Cassini VIMS
January 29, 2016 United States Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20590 Filed in www.regulations.gov 

# AkinGump STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP

GREGORY S. WALDEN +1 202.887.4213/fax: +1 202.887.4288 gswalden@akingump.com

Re: FAA 2015-0048; PrecisionHawk USA, Inc. Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11345A under Section 333 oftheFAA Modernization and Reform Act, 49 U.S.C. 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 PrecisionHawk USA, Inc. ("PrecisionHawk"), by its counsel, hereby seeks an amendment to Exemption No. 11345A to authorize PrecisionHawk to operate the following small unmanned aircraft systems ("sUAS") in addition to the previously authorized Lancaster Hawkeye Mk-III, for the same purposes and under the same conditions and limitations contained in ExemptionNo. 11345, as amended in ExemptionNo. 11345A: • senseFly eBee, senseFly eBee Ag, senseFly eBee RTK, senseFly eXom • Ascending Technologies Falcon 8 • AltavianNova F6500, AltavianNova R8400, Altavian Galaxy* • 3D Robotics Solo, 3D Robotics Aero-M • Yuneec Q500 Typhoon, Yuneec Tornado H920 • Draganflyer Guardian, DraganflyerX4-P, DraganflyerX4-ES, Draganflyer Commander* • DJI Agras,* DJI Phantom 1, DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI Phantom 3 Professional, DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, DJI Inspire, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Spreading Wings S800, DJI Spreading Wings S900, DJI Spreading Wings S1000, DJI Spreading Wings S1000+, DJI Matrice 100 Each of these sUAS models (other than three models followed by an asterisk) has been authorized by the FAA in previously granted section 333 exemptions to be operated for the same

RobertS. Strauss Building 1 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. 1Washington, D.C. 20036-1564 i 202.887.4000 1fax 202.887.4288 !aking•w ·p comPrecisionHawk USA, Inc. Petition for Amendment ofExemption January 29, 2016 Page2 or similarpurposes. 1 Because the reliefrequested herein is all but one respect - set forth below- the same as the reliefrequested in previously granted exemptions, and because PrecisionHawk will abide by and comply with the terms and conditions in those exemptions, PrecisionHawk respectfully requests summary processing of this petition, and that the FAA dispense with Federal Registerpublication and public comment. PrecisionHawk also seeks to revise condition #20, which prohibits the pilot in command ("PIC") from initiating a flight unless there is reserve power for at least 5 minutes afterthe planned flight, and to seek a concomitant exemption from 14 C.F.R. §91.151. The Lancaster Hawkeye Mk-III has a total fight endurance of up to 45 minutes. This sUAS uses a battery charge estimation algorithm that automatically lands the UAV with approximately 2 minutes of flight time left. Accordingly, PrecisionHawk seeks arevision to condition #20 to replace "5" with "2".

1We believe FAA has in its possession the manufacturer manuals for each sUAS listed other than perhaps the three models that are followed with an asterisk. Manufacturer manuals for these models will be provided subsequently.