alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0091, FRL-8018-2] 

      ( print page 1794)    

### Correction

In notice document E5-8269 beginning on page 333 in the issue of Wednesday, January 4, 2006, make the following correction:

                On page 333, in the first column, under the                 **DATES**                 heading, in the second line, “February 3, 2006” should read “March 6, 2006”.            

[FR Doc. Z5-8269 Filed 1-10-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 16, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 37113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10716]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 16, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 37113]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-924-1430-01; NDM 83168]


Public Land Order No. 7206; Withdrawal of Public Lands for 
Waterfowl Production Areas; North Dakota

Correction

    In notice document 96-17341 appearing on page 36079 in the issue of 
Tuesday, July 9, 1996, make the following corection:
    On page 36079, in the second column, under Fifth Principal 
Meridian, T. 142 N., R. 75 W., the second line should read: ``Sec. 14, 
S\1/2\SW\1/4\ and E\1/2\SE\1/4\;''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Sam Messina, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Viastar Media Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the three months September 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Viastar Media Corporation


Dated:   April 8, 2005              By: /s/ Sam Messina
                                        -----------------------------------
                                            Sam Messina
                                            Interim Chief Financial Officer



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Viastar Media Corporation and will be retained by Viastar Media
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Top-predator recovery abates geomorphic decline of a coastal ecosystem      

      January 31, 2024    

The recovery of top predators is thought to have cascading effects on vegetated ecosystems and their geomorphology1,2, but the evidence for this remains correlational and intensely debated3,4. Here we combine observational and experimental data to reveal that recolonization of sea otters in a US estuary generates a trophic cascade that facilitates coastal wetland plant biomass and suppresses the erosion of marsh edges—a process that otherwise leads to the severe loss of habitats and ecosystem services5,6. Monitoring of the Elkhorn Slough estuary over several decades suggested top-down control in the system, because the erosion of salt marsh edges has generally slowed with increasing sea otter abundance, despite the consistently increasing physical stress in the system (that is, nutrient loading, sea-level rise and tidal scour7,8,9). Predator-exclusion experiments in five marsh creeks revealed that sea otters suppress the abundance of burrowing crabs, a top-down effect that cascades to both increase marsh edge strength and reduce marsh erosion. Multi-creek surveys comparing marsh creeks pre- and post-sea otter colonization confirmed the presence of an interaction between the keystone sea otter, burrowing crabs and marsh creeks, demonstrating the spatial generality of predator control of ecosystem edge processes: densities of burrowing crabs and edge erosion have declined markedly in creeks that have high levels of sea otter recolonization. These results show that trophic downgrading could be a strong but underappreciated contributor to the loss of coastal wetlands, and suggest that restoring top predators can help to re-establish geomorphic stability.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joseph Tomoleoni

##### Biologist & Southwest Region Dive Safety Officer

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

jtomoleoni@usgs.gov

831-254-9750

## Related Content

#### Joseph Tomoleoni

##### Biologist & Southwest Region Dive Safety Officer

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

jtomoleoni@usgs.gov

831-254-9750

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 94-8154 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HENRY OLUSHOLA OBOH, aka Henry Osa Omoboh,

aka James Clark aka Derick Forest,

 Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia

--------------------------

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 29, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, F.2d )

(November 13, 1995)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX,

BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.*

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll

on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this

court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en

banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this

court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

*Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Albert J. Henderson has elected to participate

in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §46(c).
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO THE 
 ON
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 
 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 

ON Semiconductor Corporation, formerly SCG Holding Corporation (the “Company”), previously approved and adopted the
SCG Holding Corporation 2000 Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan has been amended on a number of occasions. By this instrument, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares available for purchase under the
Plan from its existing 23,500,000 shares to 28,500,000 shares. 
 1.    The provisions of this Amendment
shall be effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders. 
 2.    Section 4
(Stock Subject to Plan) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence and replacing it with the following language: 

Subject to adjustment as provided below, the total number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance or which may
be otherwise acquired upon exercise of Purchase Rights under the Plan will be 28,500,000. 
 3.    This
Amendment shall amend only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein. Those provisions of the Plan not expressly amended hereby shall be considered in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ON Semiconductor Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed as of this 17th day of May, 2017. 
  
  

			
	 ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s MARK N. ROGERS

		 	 Mark N. Rogers

	 Its:
	 	Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel, Assistant Compliance and Ethics Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
Maurice CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4626

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 15, 2018

Maurice Campbell, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Osterhaus and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Sergio Luis GARZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-352

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

National News Release        October 20, 2016        Water Detected on Largest Metallic Asteroid in Solar System

slideshow        July 20, 2023        Planetary Science at the USGS
William CRUZ, Appellant, v. MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D18-153

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jimmie Lee LAZENBERRY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AMERI-FORCE INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mihir K. Taneja, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeoPharma, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 15, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mihir K. Taneja    
|                       |  |     |  | Mihir K. Taneja        
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Arturo RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1159

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Aubrey Bernard LAVENDER

1160618 (CR-15-1288)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40570

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PETER GERALD WAHL,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(95-CV-60)

 

January 16, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Peter Gerald Wahl requests permission to proceed in forma

pauperis in his appeal of the district court's denial of his motion

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion is DENIED. Wahl's appeal

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper
Exhibit
32





Certifications
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Angelo De Caro and Robert F. O’Connell, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Angelo De
      CaroAngelo
      De CaroChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Robert F. O'ConnellRobert
      F. O’ConnellChief
      Financial Officer





May 12,
2008














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of this
Report.
Manuel NEIRA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT
TO THE IDAHO POWER COMPANY
SECURITY PLAN FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES II


The Idaho Power Company Security Plan for Senior Management Employees II, as amended and restated effective February 8, 2017 (the "Plan") is further amended as set forth below.  These amendments shall be effective February 8, 2017.


1.       Section 5.6.1 is amended to read as follows:


"The Participant may also elect to receive Actuarial Equivalent payments in one of the forms of benefit listed below:


(a)    A   joint   and   survivor   annuity   with   monthly   payments continued to the surviving spouse at an amount equal to 75% of the Participant's benefit.


(b)     A   joint   and   survivor   annuity   with   monthly   payments continued to the surviving spouse at an amount equal to the Participant's benefit.


(c)     A single life annuity, if the Participant had previously elected one of the joint and survivor annuity options listed above.


For clarity, if the surviving spouse's date of birth is after the Participant's date of birth, these Actuarial Equivalent payments shall include, without limitation, reduction of the monthly benefit using Actuarial Equivalent factors to reflect the number of years of age difference."


APPROVED BY THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON MAY 17, 2017


IDAHO POWER COMPANY


    
By: /s/ Darrel T. Anderson
      Chief Executive Officer




By: /s/ Patrick A. Harrington
      Corporate Secretary
EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Amended  Quarterly  Report  of ATNG,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on December 16, 2002 (the "Report") I,
George Betts,  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18USC ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Tag Chong Kim

_____________________________________________________________
Tag Chong Kim, President & CFO
by Robert Gates, By Power of Attorney in Fact
Donald WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0649

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
=================================================================

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 72 SSM 1

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Ronnell Jordan, 

 Appellant.

Submitted by Kevin C. Adam, for appellant.

Submitted by Amy Appelbaum, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant failed to preserve his contention that the

trial court discharged prospective jurors based on hardship

without conducting a sufficient inquiry (see People v King, __

NY3d __ [decided herewith]). Defendant's remaining contentions

- 1 -
- 2 - No. SSM 1

are without merit. 

- 2 -
People v Ronnell Jordan

No. SSM 1 

Rivera, J (dissenting):

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in

People v King (___ NY3d ___, [decided herewith]), I would reverse

the order of the Appellate Division on the sole ground that the

judge's jury selection process denied defendant his right to a

jury trial.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Judges Pigott, Abdus-Salaam,

Stein and Fahey concur. Judge Rivera dissents in an opinion. 

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judge Garcia took no part.

Decided March 29, 2016

- 1 -
Milagro CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 2, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*