alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3247

_____________ Michael S. McFarland; Donna C. * McFarland; Roger F. Morgan; Cherly * Morgan; Norman R. Cates; Phillis A. * Cates; Wayne E. Laslay; Annabell * Laslay; Richard A. LaPointe; Bonnie L. * LaPointe; Glen G. Pittman; Opal * Pittman; G. H. Ricker; Harriett L. * Ricker; Orson A. Rau; Glenna M. Rau; * Gary Spears; Carolyn Sue Spears; Paul * Schafer; Juanita L. Schafer; Robert J. * Schumacher; Anna E. Schumacher; * Christ Skiroiotis; Sophia Skiroiotis; * S. N. Whitcanack; Irene P. Whitcanack; * Arthur Zago; Kathleen Zago, * individually and on behalf of all other * Appeal from the United States purchasers of lots in the Lake * District Court for the Winnebago South Retirement Village * Western District of Missouri. Subdivision, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Plaintiffs - Appellees, * * v. * * Winnebago South, Inc., * * Defendant - Appellant, * * Robert V. Steinhilber; Johnita F. * Steinhilber; Jack O. Hart; James E. * Thompson, Jr.; Grandview Bank & * Trust Company; The Pleasant Hill *The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1 the Western District of Missouri. -2- Bank; Cass County Title Company; * Amca, Ltd.; Arnold M. Cook * Associates, Inc.; Arnold M. Cook; * Barry A. Cook; Iris B. Cook; Philip T. * Goldstein; Thomas C. Mason; * Emmanuel Rubin; David L. Gibson * Associates, Inc.; David L. Gibson; * Lake Winnebago Real Estate & * Management Company, Inc.; Bonnie * Hart; Alex Flemington; Halsey Rains; * Mrs. Shirley Williams; Orien Fehrman; * Bannister Bank; Bank of Lee Summit; * Mission State Bank & Trust Company; * Winnebago South Homeowners * Association, Inc., * * Defendants. *

_____________ Submitted: May 14, 1998 Filed: June 2, 1998

_____________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, HEANEY and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. This has been an unduly protracted litigation. The Distr ict Court granted partial

1
summaryjudgment against Winnebago South, Inc. and in favor of plaintiffs on thei r claims under the Interstate Land Sales Disclosure Act and certified its interlocutory judgment for immediate appeal. Finding that partial summary judgment was correctly-3-

grantedand that an opinion in this fact-intensive case would lack precedential value, we affirm on the basis of the District Court's entirely adequate opinion. The judgment of the District Court is
AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 10-1367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . PEDRO MICHAEL GONCALVES, a/k/a Mike Goncalves, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on April 28, 2011, should be amended as follows. On page 7, line 2, replace "see also Gant, 129 S. Ct. at 1721." with "see also Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 1721 (2009).". On page 16, line 13, delete comma to make "291 U.S. 217, (1934)" into "291 U.S. 217 (1934)".
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


Of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Puda Coal, Inc.
(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  March
      31, 2009
                  
                  /s/ Liping
      ZhuLiping
      ZhuChief
      Executive Officer




Dated:  March
      31, 2009
                  
                  /s/
      Qiong WuQiong
      (Laby) WuChief
      Financial
Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

 

In re: Guillermo J. Santos Case No.: 21-16215-LMI 

Chapter 13 

 Debtor(s) / 

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE 

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION 

TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority status 

of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify which 

claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. Upon the filing of this 

objection an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled on the date already scheduled 

for the confirmation hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the [trustee][debtor] objects 

to the following claim filed in this case: 

Claim Amount of 

No. Name of Claimant Claim 

9 Wells Fargo Home Mortgage 166,681.15 

Basis for Objection and Recommended Disposition 

On or about 07/16/2021, Creditor filed a secured proof of claim in the amount of 166,681.15 and 

an arrearage in the amount of $3,404.94 for a 3471 NW 173rd Terrace Miami Gardens, FL 

33056-4144 Miami-Dade County Parcel Identification Number: 34-2109-009-5050Legal 

Description: MYRTLE GROVE 1ST ADD PB 57-2 LOT 17 BLK 42 LOT SIZE 75.000 X 110 

OR 17183-1427 0496 4 F/A/U 30-2109-00 / Mortgage account ending in xxxxxxxxx2297. 

Debtor requests the claim be allowed as filed, without any distribution from the Chapter 13 

Trustee. 

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this objection will be 

served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the confirmation hearing date and that 

a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the court when the 

objection and notice of hearing are served.

 

DATED: September 13, 2021 Respectfully Submitted: 

 Robert Sanchez, P.A. 

355 West 49th Street 

Hialeah, FL 33012 

Fl. Bar No. 0442161 

Telephone: (305) 687-8008 

E-Mail: court@bankruptcyclinic.com 

Case 21-16215-LMI Doc 27 Filed 09/13/21 Page 1 of 1
# C_2020013EN.01000301.xml

| 15.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/3

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.9409 — Aurubis/Metallo Group Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 13/02)

On 19 November 2019, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.9409 — Aurubis/Metallo Group Holding, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
Jose L. MARTINEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0330

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
David Rodriguez LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3037

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|**EXHIBIT 21.1  Subsidiaries**
|------------------------------

|
|

|
|

|**Company Name**                          | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation**
|----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                                          |                                  
|GSL Corporation                           | Delaware                         
|NAMSCO Inc.                               | Delaware                         
|North American Salt Company               | Delaware                         
|Great Salt Lake Minerals Corporation      | Delaware                         
|Carey Salt Company                        | Delaware                         
|Minosus Limited                           | United Kingdom                   
|Salt Union Limited U.K.                   | United Kingdom                   
|Direct Salt Supplies Limited (U.K.)       | United Kingdom                   
|London Salt Limited (U.K.)                | United Kingdom                   
|Compass Minerals (Europe) Limited         | United Kingdom                   
|Compass Minerals (UK) Limited             | United Kingdom                   
|Northern Salt, LLP                        | Kansas                           
|Sifto Canada Inc.                         | Ontario, Canada                  
|J.T. Lunt & Co. (Nantwich) Limited (U.K.) | United Kingdom                   
|Compass Resources, Inc.                   | Delaware                         
|                                          |                                  

|
|

|
|

| |  | 
| |  | 

|
|

|
|
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        How does carbon get into the atmosphere?

faq        April 12, 2019        Does Landsat Level-1 data processing include atmospheric correction?

faq        April 15, 2022        Why does my Landsat Collection 2  Surface Temperature product have missing data?

faq        June 29, 2017        How does acid precipitation affect marble and limestone buildings?

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Handout, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Fill-in-the-blank, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Poster, PDF)

Reference Materials        December 11, 2017        All water on Earth in a sphere, placed over a "dry" globe
Michael D. ARRINGTON, Appellant, v. William E. GREGORY, Esq., and William E. Gregory and Associates, P.A., Appellees.

No. 3D17-131

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      13.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C.  Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002**




In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam
        Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
        the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R.S.P.
        Sinha, Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that, to the best of my knowledge:
  
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.


/s/
                R.S.P. SinhaName:
            Mr.
                R.S.P. SinhaTitle:
            Chairman-cum-Managing
                DirectorDate:
            September
              24,
              2007


The
      foregoing
      certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or
      relied upon for any other purposes.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - (-)montana(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        December 15, 2020        High elevation ice patch documents Holocene climate variability in the northern Rocky Mountains

publication        May 12, 2020        Effects of climate change on plague exposure pathways and resulting disease dynamics

Research        April 7, 2016        Boulder Glacier, 1932 - 1988
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(20)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(11)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 3, 2011        An Unseen World Beneath Our Feet - Caves, Sinkholes and Springs

Podcasts        February 11, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 112 - Landsat in Popular Media

Podcasts        April 21, 2008        Is there earthquake weather?

Podcasts        May 22, 2008        What's Killing Bats in the Northeast?
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-155644) and related Prospectus of SunocoLogistics Partners L.P. pertaining to equity securities of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (as issuer of common units representing limited partnership interests) and debt of Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations L.P. (as issuer of debt securities),and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96897) pertaining to the Sunoco Partners LLC Long-Term Incentive Plan of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. of our reports dated February 24, 2009, with respect to the financial statements of SunocoLogistics Partners L.P., the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., and the parent-company-only balance sheet of Sunoco Partners LLC included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2008. 

 

/s/ Ernst& Young LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 24, 2009
STATE EX REL. Luther HICKMAN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0158

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, relator's guilty plea waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. *State v. Crosby* , 338 So.2d 584 (La. 1976). Finally, relator's sentencing claims are not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
----

----

Exhibit 32.2

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FPB Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the period covered by the report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | By: /s/ Nancy E. Aumack                 |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 12, 2010  |              Nancy E. Aumack,                     |
|                            |              Principal Financial Officer               |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)
              PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, the undersigned officer of Lightspan, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,
2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 12, 2003
                                                    ---------------------
                                                    John T. Kernan,
                                                    Chairman of the Board
                                                    and Chief Executive
                                                    Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Lightspan, Inc. and will be retained by Lightspan, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       30
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3158

_____________________________
R ICHARD C HRISTINSEN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

. March 29, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition is d enied on the merits

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Richard Christinsen, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
**Exhibit 7.1****Ratio of earnings to fixed charges**                       **As of December 31,**  **Restated** **Restated** **Restated** **Restated** **Restated****($ millions, except ratios)** **2004** **2003** **2002** **2001** **2000**(Loss) income before taxes  (381.2)  210.7   17.9   (538.0)  (150.2)Fixed charges:                    Interest expense  33.1   31.0   16.4   24.2   17.1 Interest portion of rental expense  5.2   5.2   4.9   3.6   3.4                                           (Loss) income before taxes plus fixed charges  (342.9)  246.9   39.2   (510.2)  (129.7)                                          Fixed charges                    Interest expense  33.1   31.0   16.4   24.2   17.1 Interest portion of rental expense  5.2   5.2   4.9   3.6   3.4                                           Total fixed charges  38.3   36.2   21.3   27.8   20.5                                           Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  (a)  6.8   1.8   (b)  (c)The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is calculated by dividing earnings by fixed charges.Fixed charges consist of interest expense and the interest portion of rental expense. (a) Due to Converium’s loss in 2004 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. Converium would haveneeded to generate additional earnings of $342.9 million to achieve coverage of 1:1.(b) Due to Converium’s loss in 2001 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. Converium would haveneeded to generate additional earnings of $510.2 million to achieve coverage of 1:1.(c) Due to Converium’s loss in 2000 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. Converium would haveneeded to generate additional earnings of $129.7 million to achieve coverage of 1:1.