alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of Louisiana v. Brandon BOYD

No. 2017-K-1749

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM

Defendant was found guilty of a second degree murder he committed while 17 years old. After conducting a hearing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 878.1, the district *408court sentenced defendant to life imprisonment at hard labor without parole eligibility. The court of appeal affirmed the conviction. *State v. Boyd* , 17-0014, p. 8 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/15/17), 2017 WL 4082248 (unpub'd). However, the court of appeal identified as an error patent that defendant was sentenced within 24 hours of the denial of defendant's motions for new trial and postverdict judgment of acquittal in violation of La.C.Cr.P. art. 873's prohibition, "If a motion for a new trial, or in arrest of judgment, is filed, sentence shall not be imposed until at least twenty-four hours after the motion is overruled." The court of appeal found that, because the district court was required to exercise discretion to determine whether defendant would receive parole eligibility, and because defendant moved to reconsider the sentence and complained of the sentence on appeal, the error required it to vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

However, La.C.Cr.P. art. 873 also provides: "If the defendant expressly waives a delay provided for in this article or pleads guilty, sentence may be imposed immediately." At the outset of the hearing here, the state offered the trial record into evidence with the proviso that it was doing so if defendant was prepared to go forward with the hearing. The defense responded that it had no objection to doing so. This sufficed to constitute an explicit waiver of the sentencing delay, as authorized by La.C.Cr.P. art. 873. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeal, reinstate the sentence, and remand to the court of appeal to consider any pretermitted claims.

**REVERSED AND REMANDED**

GENOVESE, J., would deny.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5266 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5266

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that information 
regarding the deduction of amounts of disability compensation by reason 
of voluntary separation pay is provided to members of the Armed Forces 
                   separating from the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2016

  Mr. DeSaulnier (for himself and Mr. Jones) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that information 
regarding the deduction of amounts of disability compensation by reason 
of voluntary separation pay is provided to members of the Armed Forces 
                   separating from the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servicemember and Veteran Financial 
Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF INFORMATION IN TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 1144(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Provide information regarding the deduction of 
        disability compensation paid by the Secretary of Veterans 
        Affairs pursuant to section 1175a(h) of this title by reason of 
        voluntary separation pay received by the member.''.
                                 <all>
```
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 203 (Wednesday, October 21, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 56290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-41021]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)

Correction

    In notice document 98-27586 appearing on page 55405 in the issue of 
Thursday, October 15, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 55405, in the second column, in the DATES: section, in 
the second line, ``1998'' should read ``1999''.
    2. On page 55405, in the second column, in the tenth line from the 
bottom, ``1998'' should read ``1999''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Jermaine EARL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Ray
      Grimm, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ACTIS
      Global Ventures, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies
      with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
      of
      operations of ACTIS Global Ventures, Inc.








BY: /s/
      Ray W. Grimm, Jr.


Name:
      Ray
      W. Grimm, Jr.




Title:
      Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer





Date:
      April 17, 2007
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report of
Wizard World, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John Macaluso, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |     |                                                        | 
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Date: April 16, 2012 | By: | /s/ John Macaluso                                      | 
|                     |     | John Macaluso                                          | 
|                     |     | Principal Financial Officer
        Wizard World, Inc. |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 13, 2019

No. 04-19-00013-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.W.L., G.L.L, L.R. III., and A.R., Children

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15759A

Honorable Cathy Morris, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is ordered DISMISSED 

FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on March 13, 2019.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of March, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10729]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 29, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 40568]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration
[BPD-889-NC]
RIN 0938-AH88


Medicare Program; Schedule of Limits on Home Health Agency Costs 
Per Visit for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning on or After July 1, 1997

Correction

    In notice document 97-17235 beginning on page 35608 in the issue of 
Tuesday, July 1, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 35614, in the first column:
      a. In the second example (2.), in the equation line above Step 3, 
equation ``11.58995<divide>10=158995'' should read 
``11.58995<divide>10=1.158995''.
      b. In the second example (2.), Step 6, letter a, the equation 
line, ``$79.01 x 1.01199=$79.89'' should read 
``$79.01 x 1.011099=$79.89''.
    2. On page 35615, in the first table, in the last entry line 
``Aggregate cost limit'' in the fifth column over ``Aggregate limit'', 
``918,5501'' should read ``918,550''
    3. On the same page, in the second table, in the column entitled 
``Limit'', the first entry ``101.20'' should read ``101.29''.
    4. On page 35619, the first and second entries on that page, 
``DuPage, IL, Grundy, IL'' should read first entry ``DuPage, IL'', 
second entry ``Grundy, IL''.
    5. On page 35624, in the first column, fourth entry from the 
bottom, ``4480*'' should read ``4480''.
    6. On the same page, in the same entry line, in the second column 
``Urban area (Constituent counties or county equivalents)'' ``Los 
Angeles-Long Beach CA'' should read ``*Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA''.
    7. On page 35628, in the ``Wage index'' column, the third entry, 
``1.01116'' should read ``1.0116''.
    8. On page 35630, in entry line beginning with ``7560'', in the 
second column ``Urban area (Constituent counties or county 
equivalents)'', ``Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazelton, PA'' should read 
``Scranton--Wilkes- Barre--Hazelton, PA''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Jahi Amadi HASANATI, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-3274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Tracey MACKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2018

Tracey Mackey, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is Tracey Mackey's third postconviction relief appeal to this court. In *Mackey v. State* , 219 So.3d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), this court reversed the summary denial of Mackey's postconviction motion and instructed the lower court to afford Mackey the opportunity to amend. In *Mackey v. State* , 236 So.3d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), this court affirmed the denial, after amendment, of Mackey's motion on all grounds except Ground Two, which alleged that Mackey's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a particular witness who would have afforded testimony supporting his defense at trial. This court ruled that Ground Two was "facially sufficient" and instructed the lower court to either hold an evidentiary hearing on that claim or attach records conclusively refuting it. *Id.* at 505.

On remand, the lower court denied Ground Two, finding that the record conclusively showed that: (1) Mackey and his counsel noted on the record at trial that the witness had proved difficult to find because she changed her phone number and refused to testify; and (2) Mackey could not show prejudice even if his allegations were true because there was "overwhelming evidence" of Mackey's guilt. We respectfully disagree with the trial court. First, the records attached to the trial court's order do not refute Mackey's claim that counsel misrepresented to him the availability of the witness. Second, the alleged anticipated testimony of the uncalled witness, if found credible, would undermine the identification testimony of the two alleged victims, as well as provide a non-incriminating reason why a scrap of cloth with Mackey's DNA was found at the scene of the alleged crime.

The trial court is directed, on remand, to attach additional records conclusively refuting Mackey's claim or to hold an evidentiary hearing.

*356REVERSED and REMANDED, with instructions.

EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. KINGSWOOD LEASING, INC., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0713

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave Climates

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(20)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(11)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 3, 2011        An Unseen World Beneath Our Feet - Caves, Sinkholes and Springs

Podcasts        February 11, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 112 - Landsat in Popular Media

Podcasts        April 21, 2008        Is there earthquake weather?

Podcasts        May 22, 2008        What's Killing Bats in the Northeast?

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!

Interviews        March 2, 2010        Public Lecture: Extreme Science: Understanding our Earth
Power of Attorney



 EXHIBIT 4.102 
 Power of Attorney 
 I, Wang Yu Tian, a PRC citizen whose ID number is 110108195606131211, hereby irrevocably
authorize Wang Lei Lei and a person (the “Appointed Person”), appointed by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. at times, to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 Wang Lei Lei and the Appointed Person are authorized to, on my behalf, exercise all the voting rights as a shareholder of Beijing Bo Xun Rong Tong Information Technology
Co., Ltd. (“the Company”) by laws and by articles of association in shareholders meeting of the Company with all powers, including but not limited to, sale or transfer of all or part of the shares in the Company and assignment and
appointment of the directors and general manager of the Company as an authorized representative. 
 The above-mentioned authorization and attorney are based
on the following assumptions: Wang Lei Lei or the Appointed Person is an employee of Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. approves of such authorization and attorney. Once Wang Lei Lei
or the Appointed Person is no longer employed by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. or Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. gives a written notice of replacing its attorney, I shall forthwith recall the attorney and
authorization herein and appoint/authorize other employees assigned by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. to exercise all the voting rights owed by a shareholder of the Company in the shareholders meeting on our behalf. 
 The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years from the execution date unless the Business Operation Agreement among Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd.,
Beijing Bo Xun Rong Tong Information Technology Co., Ltd. Wang Yu Tian and I is terminated before expiry whatsoever. 
 Wang Yu Tian 
  

			
	 Signature:
	 	  


 Date: 1 June, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 22-12158-LMI

SUSANA DE MARCOS CHAPTER 13

Debtor,

________________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing Order Continuing Hearing on 

Objection to Claim of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, D.E.#35 was sent via USPS Mail or electronic 

transmission to every party on the attached Matrix and all others set forth in the NEF dated this 13 of 

June 2022.

CORONA LAW FIRM, P.A.

/s/ Ricardo Corona, Esq. 

RICARDO CORONA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 111333

6700 SW 38th Street

Miami, FL 33155

(305) 547-1234 Phone

(305) 266-1151 Fax

bk@coronapa.com

Case 22-12158-LMI Doc 39 Filed 06/17/22 Page 1 of 2
Credit Mailing Matrix

 Case No.: 22-12158-LMI

Sent Via Electronic Service Sent Via Electronic Service

Office of US Trustee Nancy Neidich Trustee

51 SW 1st Avenue, Ste 1204 PO Box 279806

Miami, FL 33130 Miramar, FL 33027 

Sent via Email

Keith Labell – Authorized Agent for Secured Lender

Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, LLC

6409 Congress Avenue, Suite 100

Boca Raton, FL 33487

Email: klabell@raslg.com

Sent via US Mail

Susana De Marcos

228 E. 3rd Street, Unit 1

Hialeah, FL 33010

Case 22-12158-LMI Doc 39 Filed 06/17/22 Page 2 of 2
James M. NEWTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Miguel BURGOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4835 1D18-0699 (Consolidated for disposition)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND AS OF MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0001092797
<NAME> SPACE LAUNCHES FINANCING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         108,791
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00


</TABLE>
Joshua CAREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of Knobias, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Key Ramsey, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  March 31, 2006                            By: /s/ SUSAN R. WALKER
                                                    ------------------
                                                 Susan R. Walker
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 10 2022 1.14E+07 0 20 2022 1.70E+09 0 30 2022 3.33E+08 0 40 2022 1.14E+07 0 50 2022 7.08E+07 0 60 2022 1.60E+08 0
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 21, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with California Air Resource Board FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 23, 2011 b etween CARB , DOT, and EPA and included the following individuals: CARB: Daniel Hawelti, Dipak Bishnu NHTSA: John Finneran EPA: Victor McMahan, Anthony Erb, Lauren Steele , and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on sharing information about CARB’s idle reduction regulations, including the override provisions for engine shutdown.