alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Christi Lee Straub Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DECLARATION REGARDING PAYMENT ADVICES

Debtor:

 Copies of all payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the debtor from any employer within 60

days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior,

attach copies of any and all received and provide explanation that you didn't work the full 60 days.

)

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor had no income from any employer during the 60 days

prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor:

 receives disability payments

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation

 receives Social Security payments

 receives a pension

 does not work outside the home

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the debtor is unable to timely provide some or all copies of payment advices or

other evidence of payment received

Explain: 

Joint Debtor (if applicable):

 Copies of payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the joint debtor from any employer within 60

days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior,

attach copies of any and all received and provide explanation that you didn't work the full 60 days.

)

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor had no income from any employer during the 60 days

prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor:

 receives disability payments

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation

 receives Social Security payments

 receives a pension

 does not work outside the home

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the joint debtor is unable to timely provide some or all copies of payment

advices or other evidence of payment received

Explain: 

LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 1 of 2

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-13230-EPK Doc 7 Filed 04/02/21 Page 1 of 2
NOTE: When submitting copies of evidence of payment such as pay stubs or payment advices, it is your responsibility to redact

(blackout) any social security numbers, names of minor children, dates of birth or financial account numbers before attaching for

filing with the court. See Local Rule 5005-1(A)(2).

/s/ Christi Lee Straub Date: April 2, 2021

Christi Lee Straub

Signature of Attorney or Debtor

LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 2 of 2

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-13230-EPK Doc 7 Filed 04/02/21 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5376 

To provide Federal funds for the Chicago State University. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2016 

Mr. RUSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide Federal funds for the Chicago State University. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THE CHICAGO STATE 

4 UNIVERSITY. 

5 There are authorized to be appropriated, and there 

6 are appropriated (in addition to any other amounts appro7 priated for the purpose described in this section and out 

8 of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated), 

9 to the Chicago State University in Chicago, Illinois, to im10 prove the academic quality, institutional management, and 

11 fiscal stability of the University— 

12 (1) for fiscal year 2016, $10,000,000; and 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5376 IH

1 (2) for fiscal year 2017 and each succeeding fis2 cal year, $20,000,000. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EPA REG FILE No. 61282-55

Vol 2 
1
2
3
4

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
5
EPA REGISTRTION FILE #61282-55 VOL 2

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 6 through 16 are not included in this copy. 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_ __ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

 Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

X__The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

 FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

Internal deliberative information. 

_____ Attorney-Client work product. 

 Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency.

_____ Personal Privacy Information

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact 

the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
EX PARTE Richard Douglas REESE, Jr.

1140640 (CR-13-1543)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Competitive Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) William Gray, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 2, 2011






By:  /s/ William Gray


William Gray, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - (-)other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

About        February 5, 2024        California's History of Large Storms & Floods

slideshow        December 22, 2022        Desert, aquatic, prairie, forest, riparian, tundra, and sagebrush plants

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery

About        May 21, 2020        History of the NWQP and Its Programs

About        May 21, 2020        What We Do
Jose Martin LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3431

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit      12**

**NDS      GROUP PLC**

**COMPUTATION      OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

|                                                                     |   |  **For                  the three months ended** |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                     |   |  **September                  30,**              |   |
|                                                                     |   |  **(Unaudited)**                                 |   |
| (in                  thousands, except ratio)                            |   | **2006**                                              |   | **2005** |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                  |   |   |   |
| Consolidated                  pretax income from continuing operations   |   | $                                                     | 50,602 |   | $ | 38,611 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest                  portion of rental expense                      |   |                                                  | 1,487  |   |   | 858 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings                                                                 |   | $                                                     | 52,089 |   | $ | 39,469 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed                  charges, being interest portion of rental expense |   | $                                                     | 1,487  |   | $ | 858 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio                  of earnings to fixed charges                      |   |                                                  | 35.0   |   |   | 46.0 |   |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 20, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 65394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-21247]

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 20, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 65394]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

[Docket No. 070105004-7050-01]
RIN 0694 AD95

December 2006 Wassenaar Arrangement Plenary Agreement 
Implementation: Categories 1, 2, 3, 5 Part I, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the 
Commerce Control List; Wassenaar Reporting Requirements; Definitions; 
and Statement of Understanding on Source Code

Correction

    In rule document E7-21247 beginning on page 62524 in the issue of 
Monday, November 5, 2007, make the following corrections:

PART 774--[CORRECTED]

    1. On page 62545, in Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce 
Control List), Category 6 Sensors, Export Control Classification Number 
(ECCN) 6A005, in the second column, in paragraph b.6.a., in the first 
line, ``[mu]s'' should read ``ns''.
    2. On page 62547, in Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce 
Control List), Category 6 Sensors, Export Control Classification Number 
(ECCN) 6A995, in the second column, the second occurrence of paragraph 
``d.1.a.'' should read ``d.1.a..1.''.
    3. On the same page, in the same Supplement, in the same Category, 
in the same ECCN, in the same column, paragraph ``d.1.a.2.1.'' should 
read, ``d.1.a..2.''.

[FR Doc. Z7-21247 Filed 11-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
September 11, 2014 

Gina McCarthy, Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

SQCIAXIN ISLAND TRIBE 

Re: EPA Promulgation of Water Quality Standards for Washington State 

Dear Ms McCarthy: 

I am writing you as Chairman of the Squaxin Island Tribe and on behalf of the 

members of my Tribe. I want to strongly encourage the Environmental Protection 

Agency to begin rule promulgation for Washington state water quality standards, 

including fish consumption rates protective of Tribal fish eating people. This process 

must begin with all due haste so that we can protect future generations of Tribal 

members from the contaminants currently present in our treaty protected fish 

resources. 

The Squaxin Island Tribe has been exceedingly patient and has worked exhaustively 

with the State of Washington to try to accomplish the objective of improved water 

quality standards. Unfortunately, it seems that the State is not up to the task of 

protecting all its citizens. They have repeatedly delayed efforts to update standards 

and have now suggested standards that will actually increase the cancer risk to 

Tribal members. 

Squaxi n conducted fish consumpti on surveys of its people over twenty years ago 

with the assistance of the EPA. We have attempted ever since to have these fish 

consumption rates refl ected in state wa ter quality standards. It still has not 

happened and another generation has been exposed to the elevated health risks of 

eating contaminated fish. 

SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE I 10 S.E. Squaxin Lane I Shelton, WA 98584 I Phone (360) 426-978 1 

Fax (360) 426-6577 www.squaxinisland .org 
Gina McCarthy, EPA Administrator 

September 11, 2014 

Page 2 of2 

Please, we implore you, act now to promulgate protective water quality standards. 

Our people have been waiting long enough to receive equal protection of the law 

under the Clean Water Act. 

C: Lisa Feldt, Acting Deputy Administrator 

Ken Kopocia, Acting Assistant Administrator for Office of Water
A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 24, 2022.

Case 21-21656-AJC Doc 62 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 21-21656-AJC Doc 62 Filed 06/24/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 21-21656-AJC Doc 62 Filed 06/24/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 21-21656-AJC Doc 62 Filed 06/24/22 Page 4 of 4
Paul D. PARTRIDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0291

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
ANDERSEN





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS






To GE Capital Loan Services, Inc.:

We have examined management's accompanying assertion about GE Capital Loan Services, Inc.'s (GECLS) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) for the seven months ended July 31, 2001, in relation to its servicing of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans (excluding GE related-party loans). Management is responsible for GECLS' compliance with the aforementioned servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about GECLS' compliance with the aforementioned standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on GECLS' compliance with the aforementioned standards.

In our opinion, management's accompanying assertion that GECLS' servicing of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans complied in all material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards for the seven months ended July 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects.




 Arthur Andersen LLP
Houston, Texas
March 5, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(15)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(8)
              - multimedia_image-141771(8)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(4)
              - hawaii(5)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - (-)north carolina(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 13, 2023        Climate Science Champions Season 3: Adam Terando, Research Scientist (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        April 13, 2023        Climate Science Champions Season 3: Adam Terando, Research Scientist
James Michael MCNEIL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daniel ISENHOWER, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Sam Messina, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
POP3 MEDIA CORP on Form  10-QSB for the nine  months  ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of POP3 MEDIA CORP.


Dated:   May 23, 2005               By: /s/ Sam Messina
                                        -----------------------------------
                                            Sam Messina
                                            Interim Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to POP3  MEDIA  CORP  and  will be  retained  by POP3  MEDIA  CORP and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 21-17694-RAM    Doc 32    Filed 02/17/22    Page 1 of 2

Case 21-17694-RAM    Doc 32    Filed 02/17/22    Page 2 of 2
William and Imelda WILHITE v. Heath Brian VEILLON

NO. 2018-CC-0399

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Second application for reconsideration not considered. Judgment is final. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 2167. No further filings shall be accepted in this matter.
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−19799−AJC

Chapter: 7

In re:

Carmen Sofia Gomez

5270 W 25th Avenue #202

Hialeah Gardens FL 33016−4097

SSN: XXX−XX−8352

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable A. Jay Cristol to consider the

following:

[18] Motion to Reinstate Case Filed by Debtor Carmen Sofia Gomez (Sanchez, Robert)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted time for this matter is ten

minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: February 08, 2022

Time: 10:30AM

Location: Telephone by CourtSolutions LLC

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by telephone. DO NOT GO TO THE COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must

advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services

free of charge. Although conducted by telephone, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be

observed. All participants must exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the

Court.

3. To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the

date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register

online, a reservation may also be made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described document(s) on all required parties

within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the

Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio recording maintained by the

Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the official record of the hearing.

Dated: 1/5/2022 By: Robert Sanchez

Case 21-19799-AJC Doc 19 Filed 01/05/22 Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Charles Junior TAYLOR and Larry Douglas Taylor

1160462 (2150817)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.