NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Allia nce for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.

Contract No. DE

- AC36

- 08GO28308 

# Relevant Studies for NERC’s Analysis of EPA’s Clean Power Plan 111(d) Compliance

M. Ahlstrom WindLogics



## C. Smith Utility Variab le Generation Integration Group



## D. Piwko and D. Lew GE Energy 

## A. Bloom, T. Mai, K. Clark, and M. Milligan Natio nal Renewable Energy Laboratory

Technical Report NREL/TP

- 5D00

- 63979 June 2015NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by th e Allia nce for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.

Contract No. DE

- AC36

- 08GO28308 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 303

- 275

- 3000 • www.nrel.gov 

# Relevant Studies for NERC’s Analysis of EPA’s Clean Power Plan 111(d) Compliance

M. Ahlstrom WindLogics



## C. Smith Utility Variab le Generation Integration Group



## D. Piwko and D. Lew GE Energy



## A. Bloom, T. Mai, K. Clark, and M. Milligan National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Prepared under Task No s. WE14.8B01 and SS13.2050

Technical Report NREL/TP

- 5D00

- 63979 June 2015NOTICE

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal li ability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product , process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expre ssed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications

. Available electronically at SciT ech Connect http:/www.osti.gov/scitech

Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from:

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831

- 0062 OSTI http://www.osti.gov P hone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: reports@osti.gov

Available for sale to the public, in paper, from:

U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandra

, VA 22312 NTIS http://www.ntis.gov P hone: 800.553.6847 or 703.605.6000 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis.gov

Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758

, NREL 29642, NREL 19795.

NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content

.iii

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## List of Acronyms

BAU business as usual CO 2 carbon dioxide CPP Clean Power Plan EFRS Eastern Frequency Response Study EGEAS Electric Generation Expansion Analysis System EPA Environmental Protection Agency EWITS Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study FRCC Florida Reliability Coordinating Council GE

- MARS GE Energy Multi

- Area Reliability Simulation ISO

- NE Independent System Operator New England LOLE loss

- of

- load expect ation MISO Midcontinent Independent System Operator MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology MRITS Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission Study MTEP MISO Transmission Expansion Plan NERC North American Electric Reliability Corporation NEWIS New England Wind Integration Study NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory O&M operations and maintenance PRIS PJM Renewable Energy Integration Study ReEDS Regional Energy Deployment System REF Renewable Electricity Futures Study RTEP PJM’s Regional Transmission Expansion Planning SERC Southeast Electric Reliability Corporation SNSP Simultaneous non

- synchronous penetration WECC Western Electricity Coordinating Council WWSIS Western Wind and Solar Integration Studyiv

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Executive Summary
The pro posed Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) Clean Power Plan (CPP) aims to cut carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) emissions from existing power plants to 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ) is preparing a seri es of reports to examine possible reliability concerns from the required change in the generation mix needed to achieve this target. In addition to describing their own analysis, NERC plans to highlight and summarize relevant and technically sound studies completed by other parties.

The purpose of this paper is to describe multiple studies of wind and solar integration that have found CO 2 reductions of approximately 30%. The se studies can be viewed in several ways, including as viable path s to compliance wi th the EPA rule, alternative “bookend case s ” to
compare to compliance based largely on natural gas, or something in between. The studies in this paper represent a body of work that can help inform the public discussion surrounding the cost and reliability impacts of complying with the proposed EPA CPP.

Although it is possible to assume that a large

- scale transition from coal to natural gas generation is the primary path to CPP compliance, there are actually many available paths toward compliance, and states will have significant flexibility in their approaches. Another path toward compliance emphasizes the use of wind and solar energy, and it has been studied very extensively during the past 15 years. Several recent wind and solar integration studies focused on power system operations, reliability, and stability while reducing CO 2 emissions by 30% or

more.
The summaries that follow were initially drafted by principal investigators or technical review committee s for each study and then edited to a consistent format. Not all studies examined all aspects of maintaining operational balance or reliability , but as a group these studies have examined a wide range of operational and reliability implications

. We hope tha t this document assists NERC’s efforts to include this relevant material in their reports. And more generally, we hope that this report is useful in showing that a 30% CO 2 reduction has already been extensively studied, and the body of work taken as a whol e show s that reliable and cost

- effective compliance is possible.v
This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/pub lications. Table ES

- 1

. Summary of Integration Studies and CO 2 Reduction Levels

Study Region Scenario,
Year Primary Investigators Variable Energy
Resource Level Carbon Reduction Transmission Assumption Focus of Analysis

PRIS PJM, 2026 GE, AWS, EnerNex, Exeter, Intertek,

PowerGEM Multiple 20% and 30% scenarios 27% to 41% 2016

– 17 RTEP plus economic expansion Broad, including subhourly operations, O&M, cycling, emissions

NEWIS ISO

- NE, 2020 GE, ISO

- NE, EnerNex, AWS Multiple scenarios up to 24% 30% at 24% wind penetration 2019 ISO

- NE plus overlay from New England Governors ’ Renewable Energy Blueprint Production simulation and LOLE reliability analysis

MRITS MN and MISO

North/ Central,

2028 GE, Excel Engineering, MISO, MN utilities and transmission companies Starting from 28.5% baseline, considered 40% and 50% levels of variable energy resource penetrations Starting from the 28.5% baseline, some scenarios

showed further CO 2 reductions of 11.5% to 19% MTEP 2013, exp anded via power flow analysis Dynamics including transient stability and system strength analysis, production simulation

WWSIS WECC, 2017 and 2022 NREL, GE, Intertek, 3TIER, others Up to 35% in WestConnect and 23% in the rest of the Western Interconnecti on

WWSIS

- 2: 33% in the United States (equivalent to

24% to 26% across the Western Interconnection) WWSIS

- 1: Reduced CO 2 emissions by 25% to 45%,

depending on gas price, across Western Interconnection
WWSIS

- 2: Reduced CO 2 by 29% to 34% Use of current underutilized transmission plus various

interstate transmission

expansion options WWSIS

- 1: production simulation ; WWSIS

- 2: cycling ; WWSIS

- 3: stability and dynamics

EFRS Eastern Interconnection, 2013 GE, NREL 25% in Eastern Interconnection (40% in Eastern Interconnection excluding SERC and FRCC) Wind replaced thermal generation at existing power plant sites Detailed model of the current system AC power flow, 60

- s dynamic simulations

EWITS Eastern Interconnection, 2024 NREL, EnerNex, MISO, Ventyx 30% and multiple 20% scenarios 19% with 30% wind and no carbon price, 32% with 20% wind plus carbon price Economic build

- out using EGEAS model Production cost (PROMOD) and power flow (GE

- MARS)

REF National NREL, MIT, others 50% variable energy resource, 80% total renewable energy 40% by 2030, 80% by 2050 Expansion estimated in ReEDS Capacity expansion and production

simulationvi

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRE L) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Table of Contents

PJM Renewable Energy Integration Study (2014)

................................ ................................ ................... 1 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ......................... 1 Overview

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 1 Major Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 2 Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 2 Key Findings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 Study Report

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3 New England Wind Integration Study (2010)

................................ ................................ ............................ 4 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ......................... 4 Major Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 4 Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 4 Key Findings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Study Reports

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 5 Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission Study (2014)

................................ ......... 6 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ......................... 6 Major Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 6 Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 6 Key Fi ndings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 7 Study Reports and Presentations

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 7 Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phases 1

– 3 (2010

– 2013)

................................ ................... 8 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ......................... 8 Overview

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 8 Major Assumptions and Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................ 8 WWSIS

- 1

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 8 WWSIS

- 2

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 9 WWSIS

- 3

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 9 Key Findings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 10 WWSIS

- 1

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 10 WWSIS

- 2

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 10 WWSIS

- 3

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 11 Study Reports and Presentations

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 12 Eastern Frequency Response Study (2013)

................................ ................................ ........................... 13 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ....................... 13 Major Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 13 Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 13 Key Findings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 14 Study Reports an d Presentations

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 15 Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study (2010)

................................ ................................ ... 16 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ....................... 16 Major Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 16 Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 16 Key Findings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 17 Study Reports and Presentations

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 17 Renewable Electricity Futures Study (2012)

................................ ................................ .......................... 18 Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis

................................ ................................ ....................... 18 Overview

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 18 Major Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 18 Summary of the Analysis

................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 19 Key Findings

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 19vii

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRE L) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies

................................ ................................ ....... 19 Grid Operability and Hourly Resource Adequacy

................................ ................................ ...... 19 Reliability

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 20 Transmission Expansion

................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 20 Cost and Environmental Implications of High Renewable Electricity Futures

........................... 20 Effects of Demand Growth

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 21 Study Reports and Presentations

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 21 Conclusion

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 22 Bibliography

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 23viii

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NRE L) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## List of Figures

Figure 1. ISO

- NE total emissions state

- of

- the

- art forecast, best sites onshore. Image from Final Report: New England Wind Integration Study (p. 217)

................................ ................................ ........ 4 Figure 2. WWSIS

- 2 results showing absolute CO2 2 emissions disaggregated into operations and starts. (Ramping emissions are not shown, because they were found to have no significant impact.) 10


## List of Tables

Table ES

- 1. Summary of Integration St udies and CO 2 Reduction Levels

................................ .................... v Table 1. CO 2 Emissions from PJM Power Plants for the PRIS Study Scenarios

................................ .......... 11

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## PJM Ren ewable Energy Integration Study (2014) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis
While working closely with PJM during a period of three years, GE and numerous stakeholders examined aspects of power system performance incorporating renewable energy integration

, including hourly operation, subhourly operation (variability and fast ramps), transmission utilization/congestion, thermal plant cycling, operating cost s , emissions, and resource adequacy usin g extensive loss

- of

- load expectation (LOLE) analysis. Based on this modeling of subhourly operation, O&M, cycling, and LOLE, n o significant risks to system security were found. The study concluded that as long as sound engineering practices and judgment we re applied to system design/implementation, the PJM system would be as robust with 20% to 30% renewable energy penetration as it would be with the existing generation fleet.



### Overview This study did an exhaustive analysis of many scenarios

, as shown in the following table, including various mixes of offshore wind, onshore wind, solar photovoltaic , and dispersed wind. The impacts on coal

- and gas

- fired generators were carefully studied with respect to ramping

, cycling operations, and environmental emissions. GE MAPS production cost simulations were used to calculate the steady

- state “without cycling” emission amounts, which were then updated using Intertek ’s regression results to generate the total “with cycling” emissions estimates.

Table 1

. CO 2 Emissions from PJM Power Plants for the PRIS Study Scenarios

Scenario Reduction in MWh Energy Output from Coal and Gas Plants Relative to 2% BAU Scenario Reduction in Heat Input (Fuel) Relative to 2% BAU Scenario Reduction in CO 2 Emissions Relative to 2% BAU

Scenario

14% Renewable Portfolio Standards 15% 14% 12%

20% HOBO a 20% 18% 14%

20% HSBO b 18% 16% 15%

20% LOBO c 19% 19% 18%

20% LODO d 18% 18% 17%

30% HOBO 35% 32% 27%

30% HSBO 31% 29% 28%

30% LOBO 40% 40% 41%

30% LODO 30% 29% 29%

a HOBO : High offshore, best onshore
b HSBO: High solar, best onshore c LOBO: Low offshore, best onshore
d LODO: Low offshore, dispersed onshore2

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

### Major A ssumptions The study evaluated renewable energy (wind and solar) penetration levels of 2%, 14%, 20%

, and 30% for the entire PJM system. PJM annual load energy was extrapolated to the study year 2026 using a method to retain critical daily and season al load shape characteristics with average annual load growth for PJM assumed to be 1.1% . Load for the rest of the Eastern Interconnection was based on Ventyx “Historical and Forecast Demand by Zone” data.

Some existing PJM power plants were assumed to retire by 2026, per retirement forecast data from PJM and Ventyx. New thermal generators ( approximately 35 GW from simple

- cycle gas turbines and 6 GW from combined

- cycle gas turbines ) were added to the PJM system in the 2% business

- as

- usual ( BAU ) scenario to meet the reserve margin requirements in 2026 consistent with the assumed load growth (for a total of approximately 65 GW from simple

- cycle gas turbines and 38 GW from combined

- cycle gas turbines ). For consistency among scenarios, the new thermal generators added to meet reserve requirements in the 2% BAU scenario remained available in all higher renewable penetration scenarios. All operating power plants were assumed to have the necessary control technologies to comply with emissions requirements.


### Summary of the A nalysis The study included the following analytical tasks:

• Statistical characterization of load, wind

, and solar power profiles to understand how variability and uncertainty change with increasing levels of variable energy resource penetration

• Analysis of reserve requirements as a function of wind and solar generation, with results verified using production simulation s and subhourly operation simul ation s

• Conceptual transmission plans developed to serve new generation resources

• Production simulation analysis to evaluate hourly operations for three calendar years

• Subhourly operation simulations to evaluate performance during fast

- ramping events, showi ng if reserves and system ramping capability are adequate to keep the system within required performance targets

. T his analysis used PROBE, a tool that PJM regularly uses to verify the performance of its subhourly markets

.

• Capacity value of wind/solar reso urces using LOLE analysis to establish the ability of wind and solar resources to contribute to resource adequacy

• Analysis of cycling duties on thermal plants, including potential increases in wear and
tear caused by increased cycling, analyzed by experts in this field from Intertek

. 

### Key F indings The study findings indicate d that the PJM system, with transmission expansion and regulating

reserves as identified in the report

, would not have any significant issues operating with up to 30% of its energy provid ed by wind and solar generation.

• Although the values varied based on total penetration and the type of renewable generation added, on average 36% of the delivered renewable energy displaced PJM3

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. coal

- fired generation, 39% displaced PJM gas

- fired generation, and the rest displaced PJM imports (or increased exports).

• No insurmountable operating issues were uncovered during the many simulated scenarios of system

- wide hourly operation s , and this was supported by hundreds of hours of subhourly o peration s using actual PJM ramping capability.

• C urtailment of the renewable generation was minimal

, and this tended to be from localized congestion rather than from broader system constraints.

• Every scenario resulted in lower PJM fuel and variable o perat ions and m aintenance (O&M) costs as well as lower average l ocational m arginal p ric es (LMPs). W hen combined with the reduced capacity factors, the lower LMPs resulted in lower gross and net revenues for the conv entional generation resources. No examination was made to determine if this might result in advanced retirement dates for some of the less viable generation.

• Some a dditional regulation was required to compensate for the increased variability introduce d by the renewable generation. The 30% scenarios, w hich added more than 100,000 MW of renewable capacity, required an annual average of only 1,000 MW to 1,500 MW of additional regulating reserves compared to the approximate ly 1,200 MW of regulating reserves modeled for load alone. No additional operating ( spinning) reserves were required.

• In addition to the reduced capacity factors on the thermal generation, some of the higher penetration scenarios showed new patterns of usage. High penetrations of solar generation significantly reduced the net loads during the day and resulted in economic operation s that required the peaking turbines to run for a few hour s prior to sunrise and after sun set rather than committing larger intermediate and baseload generation to run throughout the day.

• The renewable generation increased the amount of cycling (start

- up, shutdown

, and ramping) on the existing fleet of generators, which increased vari able O&M costs on these units. These increased costs were small relative to the value of the fuel displacement and did not significantly affect the overall economic impact of the renewable generation.

• Although cycling operations will increase a unit’s emissions relative to steady

- state operations, these increases were small relative to the reductions caused by the displacement of the fossil

- fueled generation. 

### Study Report

• PRIS website: https://www.pjm .com/committees

- and

- groups/subcommittees/irs/pris.aspx

• GE Energy
, PJM Renewable Integration Study : https://www.pjm.com/committees

- and

groups/subcommittees/irs/pris.aspx

.4

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## New England Wind Integration Study (2010) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis
The Independent System Operator New England ( ISO

- NE ) study found that 24% wind penetration would reduce ISO

- NE’s CO 2 emissions by 30% (a reduction of 15 million tons annually), whereas SO X and NO X would be reduced by 8% and 30%, respectively

. At 24% wind energy penetration, natural gas resources would still provide more than 25% of total annual energy, but this would represent a major shift in the fuel mi x for the region. Because total annual energy output from conventional resources would decline and energy prices would also decline under the se study assumptions, capacity prices from these plants may need to increase.

Figure 1

. ISO

- NE total emissions state

- of

- the

- art forecast, b est s ites o nshore

. **Image from** Final Report: New England Wind Integration Study **(p. 217)**



### Major A ssumptions
The b ase case and wind generation scenarios

, developed in consultation with ISO

- NE and stakeholders, included potential and probable scenarios for wind power development up to 24%

a nnual wind energy penetration. Three years of synthesized meteorological and wind production data corresponding to cale ndar years 2 004, 2005, and 2006 were used. Historical load data for those same calendar years were scaled up to account for anticipated load growth through year 2020. P roduction simulations were conducted to evaluate the hourly operation of the various

sce narios and penetration levels for three calendar years, and rigorous reliability calculations were made using LOLE methods to evaluate the capacity value of the wind generation.

A fundamental assumption in the New England Wind Integration Study ( NEWIS ) is that the transmission required to integrate the wind generation into the bulk power system would be available and that wind power resources would interconnect to those bulk transmission facilities. The available portfolio of non

- wind generation in New Engl and and neighboring systems was held constant among all scenarios.


### Summary of the A nalysis The primary objective of this study was to identify and quantify system performance or operational problems with respect to load following, regulating

, and operating reserves operation5

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. during low

- load periods. Three primary analytical methods were used to meet this objective: statistical analysis, hourly production simulation analysis, and reliability analysis.

Statistical analysis was used to quantify variability du e to system load as well as wind generation during multiple time frames (annual, seasonal, daily, hourly, and 10

- minute). Production simulation analysis was used to evaluate hour

- by

- hour grid operation of each scenario for three years with different wind a nd load profiles. The production simulation results included an analysis of the available ramp

- up and ramp

- down capability to deal with grid variability due to load and wind and changes in emissions due to renewable generation, among others. The

r eliabilit y analysis involved LOLE calculations for the ISO

- NE system
, including capacity value of the wind resources.


### Key F indings The study results show ed that New England could integrate wind resources to meet up to 24% of the region’s total annual electric energ y needs in 2020 if its system includes transmission upgrades comparable to the configurations identified in the New England Governors’ Renewable Energy Blueprint (a prior analysis performed at the request of the six New England g overnors). 1 The existing ISO

- NE generation fleet is dominated by natural gas

– fired resources, which are potentially very flexible in terms of ramping and maneuvering. Natural gas resources provide approximately 50% of total annual electric energy in New England assum ing no wind generation on the system. Wind generation would primarily displace natural gas

– fired generation

, because
gas

- fired generation is most often on the margin in the ISO

- NE market.

The results of this analysis indicate d that integrating wind genera tion up to the 24% wind energy scenario is operationally feasible and may reduce average system

- wide variable operating costs (i.e., fuel and variable O&M costs) in ISO

- NE by $50 /MWh to $54 /MWh of wind energy. Considering that wind generation primarily dis places natural gas

– fired generation in New England, the overall CO 2 production declines by 30% with 24% wind energy penetration.

Self

- scheduled generation reduces the flexibility of the dispatchable generation resource and can lead to excessive wind curtai lment at higher penetrations of wind generation. It is recommended that ISO

- NE examine its policies and practices for self

- scheduled generation and possibly change those policies to encourage more generation to remain under the control of ISO

- NE dispatch

c ommands. ISO

- NE may need to investigate operating methods and/or market structures to encourage the generation fleet to make its physical flexibility available for system operations.


### Study Reports

• Executive summary

— GE Energy, Final Report: New England Wind Integration Study : http://variablegen.org/wp

- content/uploads/2013/01/newis_es.pdf

• Final report

— GE Energy, Final Report: New England Wind Integration Study : http://variablegen.org/wp

- content/uploads/2013/01/newis_report.pdf

.

1 See http://www.nescoe.com/uploads/September_Blueprint_9.14.09_for_re lease.pdf

.6

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission Study (2014) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analys is The Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission Study (MRITS) broke new ground in the level of attention brought to dynamics analysis and transient stability analysis at high wind and solar penetration levels, so it should be of great intere st to those interested in system stability. This builds on a rich history of Minnesota and Midcontinent Independent System Operator ( MISO ) studies

, including the 2006 Minnesota Wind Integration Study, the 2007 Minnesota Transmission for Renewable Energy St andard Study, the 2009 Minnesota RES Update, Corridor, and Capacity Validation s tudies, the 2008 and 2009 Statewide Studies of Dispersed Renewable Generation, the 2010 Regional Generation Outlet Study, the 2011 Multi Value Project Portfolio Study, the 2013 Minnesota Biennial Transmission Project Report, the 2013 MISO Transmission Expansion Plan, and recent and ongoing MISO transmission expansion planning work. 2


### Major A ssumptions

MRITS focused on the combined operating areas of the Minnesota utilities and transmission companies in the context of the MISO North/Central market and the neighboring regions to the west and north. It e valuate d the impacts on reliability and costs associated with increas ing

r enewable e nergy to 40% of Minnesota retail electric energy sales by 2030, and t o higher proportions thereafter, with a conceptual plan for transmission necessary for access to regional geographic diversity and regional system flexibility

. For the dyn amic and stability analysis, it was assumed that :

• New wind turbine generators are a mixture of Type 3 and Type 4 turbines with standard controls

.

• N ew wind and utility

- scale solar generation is compliant with present minimum performance requirements

— i.e.

, they provide voltage regulation/reactive supp ort and have zero

- voltage ride

- through capability

.

• Local

- area issues are addressed through normal generato r interconnection requirements. 

### Summary of the A nalysis The key study tasks were to :

• Develop s tudy s cen arios and s ite w ind and s olar g eneration (Lead contributors: Minnesota Utilities and Minnesota Department of Commerce)

• Perform p roduction s imulation a nalysis (Lead c ontributor: MISO)

• Perform p ower f low a nalysis and d evelop t ransmission c onceptual p lan (Lead

c ontributors: Minnesota u tilities and t ransmission o wners and Excel Engineering)

2 See http://uvig.org/resources/#!/3700/u

- s

- regional

- and

- state

- studies

.7

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. • Evaluate o perational p erformance (Lead c ontributor: GE Energy)

• Screen for c hallenging p eriods (Lead c ontributor: GE Energy)

• Evaluate stability

- related issues, inc luding transient stability performance, voltage regulation performance, adequacy of dynamic reactive support, and weak system strength issues (Lead c ontributor: GE Energy)

• Identify and d evelop m itigations and s olutions (Lead c ontributor: GE Energy) 

### Key F indings The analytical results from this study show ed that the addition of wind and solar (variable renewable) generation to supply 40% of Minnesota’s annual electric retail sales can be reliably accommodated by the electric power system. The MRITS operati onal and dynamics analyses results show ed that with upgrades to existing transmission, the power system can be successfully operated for all hours of the year ( with no unserved load, no reserve violations, and minimal curtailment of renewable energy) with wind and solar resources increased to achieve 40% renewable energy in Minnesota and with current renewable energy standards fully implemented in neighboring MISO North/Central markets

. This is operationally achievable with most coal power plants operated as baseload must

- run units, similar to existing operating practice. It is also achievable if all coal power plants are economically committed per MISO market signals, but additional analysis would be required to better understand the implications, trade

- of fs, and mitigations rel ated to increased cycling duty. Dynamic simulation results indicate d that no fundamental system

- wide dynamic stability or voltage regulation issues would be introduced by the renewable generation

Further analysis would be needed to e nsure system reliability at 50% of Minnesota’s annual electric retail sales from variable renewables. With wind and solar resources increased to achieve 50% renewable energy in Minnesota and 25% renewable energy in MISO North/Central (10% above current renewable energy standards in neighboring states), MRITS production simulation results show ed that, with significant transmission upgrades and expansions in the five

- state area, the power system could be successfully operated for all hours of the year ( wit h no unserved load, no reserve violations, and minimal curtailment of renewable energy). Because of study schedule limitations, no dynamic analysis was performed for 50% renewable energy in Minnesota

, and this analysis is necessary to ensure system reliabi lity.


### Study Reports and Presentations

• GE Energy, Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission Study: Final Report : https://mn.gov/commerce/energy/images/final

- mri ts

- report

- 2014.pdf

.8

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phases 1

– 3 (2010

– 2013) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis Through a coordinated sequence of three major studies funded by the U.S. Department of Energy

, the Western Interconnection has become one of the most thoroughly studied areas for wind and solar integration. The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 2 (WWSIS

- 2) was the first study to thoroughly analyze the impacts on the conventional gener ator fleet in terms of O&M costs and emissions. WWSIS Phase 3 (WWSIS

- 3) broke new ground in the analysis of reliability at high wind and solar penetrations

, including detailed modeling of dynamics and stability.



### Overview Supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Energy , the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) undertook extensive research into the operation of the power system under high penetrations of wind and solar generation in the Western Interconnection. NREL worked closel y with a diverse committee of regional experts to push the limits of existing modeling capabilities to perform rigorous and objective analyses at increasing levels of precision, fidelity, and resolution.

In P hase 1 (WWSIS

- 1 ) NREL teamed with GE to analyze the operational impacts of integrating 30% wind and 5% solar for WestConnect, with 23% annual levels of variable generation in the rest of the Western Interconnection. (WestConnect consists of the major transmission providers in the states of Arizona, Col orado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming

, and parts of other states. It includes Arizona Public Service, El Paso Electric Company , NV Energy, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Salt River Project, Tri

- State Generation and Transmission Association , Tucson Elec tric Power, Western Area Power Administration, and Xcel Energy. )

Two years later, in WWSIS

- 2 NREL modeled the entire Western Interconnection with new data sets, production cost models, and subhourly analysis to understand how cycling of fossil

- fueled
gener ators impacted system emissions and production costs under different wind and solar mixes totaling 33% combined wind and solar generation in the western United States (equivalent to 24 % to 26% across the Western Interconnection ).

More recently, in WWSIS

- 3 NREL and GE conducted frequency response and transient stability analysis on select intervals from P hase 2 to understand the reliability impacts of up to a combined 53% instantaneous wind and solar penetration level. Taken as a whole, these studies document how wind and solar generation can effectively be used to reduce system

- wide emissions while meeting several key metrics wi th respect to economics and reliability , given the assumptions discussed in more detail below

. 

### Major A ssumptions and Summary of the A nalysis
**WWSIS**

**- 1** 

• Region: Focused on WestConnect ; modeled all of the W estern I nterconnection

• Type: Production s imulation9

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. • Tem poral r esolution: Hourly, with limited 10

- minute and 1

- minute resolutions

• Transmission r epresentation: Zonal

• Power flow: DC

• Model: GE MAPS

• Reserves: Contingency at 6% of load (3% spinning and 3% nonspinning)

• Fuel p rices: $2/MBTU coal

, $9.50/MBTU natural g as

• Regional c ooperation: Extensive

• Thermal e xpansion: G as combined

- cycle generation, n ot optimized for renewables

• Hydro power : N ot meteorologically synchronized with wind, solar

, and load data
**WWSIS**

**- 2** 

• Region: Western Electricity Coordinating Council ( WECC )

• Type: Production s imulation

• Temporal r esolution: 5

- minute

• Transmission r epresentation: Zonal

, no hurdle rates

, expansion performed using PLEXOS iterations

• Power flow: DC

• Model: PLEXOS

• Reserves: Contingency (3% s pin ning ), regulating

, f lexibility

• Fuel p rices (vary by region): $1.60/MMBtu coal; $2.30 /MMBtu , $4.60 / MMBtu
, $9.20/MMBtu gas

• Regional c ooperation: R egulating reserves shared across WECC

, contingency and flexibility reserves held by zone

• Thermal e xpansion: Not optimized for renewables, based on projected build

- out by WECC for 2022

• Hydro power : One

- third of hydro power has no flexibility, two

- thirds of hydro power has some flexibility based on WECC assumptions
**WWSIS**

**- 3** 

• Region: WECC

• Type: Transient s tability and f requency r esponse

• Time frame: 60

- second dynamic simulations

• Power flow: AC

• Model: PSLF ( Positive s equence l oad f low )

• Transmission: Detailed model, with additions deemed likely by WECC stakeholders during WECC power flow case development10

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. • Wind and solar generation aligned with WWSIS 2

• Change in c onventional generation dispatch due to wind and solar aligned with WWSIS 2 

### Key F indings
**WWSIS**

**- 1** 

• It is feasible for the WestConnect region to accommodate 30% wind and 5% solar energy penetration. This requires key changes to current practice, including subs tantial balancing area cooperation, subhourly scheduling, and access to underutilized transmission capacity.

• B oth variability and uncertainty of wind and solar generation impact grid operations ; h owever, the uncertainty (due to imperfect forecasts) leads to a greater impact on operations and results in some contingency reserve shortfalls and some curtailment, both of which are relatively small. The variability leads to a greater subhourly variability reserve requirement, but because conventional units are backed down, the system naturally has extra reserve margins.
**WWSIS**

**- 2** 

Figure 2

. WWSIS

- 2 results showing absolute CO 2 2 emissions disaggregated into operations and starts

. ( R amping emissions are not shown
, because they were found to have no significant impact

. )

• High penetrations of wind and solar increase annual wear

- and

- tear costs from cycling from $35 million to $157 million. This represents an additional $0.47 /MWh to $1.28/MWh of cycling costs for the average fossil

- fueled generat or. Cycling diminishes the production cost reduction of wind and solar from $0.14 /MWH to $0.67/MWh, based on the specific system and generator characteristics modeled. These costs are a small percentage of annual fuel displaced across the Western Interconn ection (approximately $7 billion) and the reduction in fuel costs ($28 /MWh to $29/MWh of wind and solar generated). However, t he costs are significant compared to the average steady

- state variable O&M and cycling costs of fossil

- fueled plants ($2.43 /MWh to $4.68/MWh, depending on scenario). Production costs do not include the capital or power purchase agreement costs to construct power plants or transmission lines

.11

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. • CO 2 , NO X , and SO 2 emissions impacts resulting from wind

- and solar

- induced cycling of fossil

- fueled generators are a small percentage of emissions avoided by the wind and solar generation. Wind

- and solar

- induced cycling has a negligible impact on avoided CO 2 emissions. Wind

- and solar

- induced cycling will cause SO 2 emissions reductions fro m wind and solar to be from 2% to 5% less than expected and NO X emissions reductions to be from 1% to 2% larger than expected. From the perspective of a fossil

fueled generator, this cycling can have a positive or negative impact on CO 2 , NO X , and SO 2 emiss ions rates.

• Solar tends to dominate variability challenges for the grid; wind tends to dominate uncertainty challenges. Both of these challenges can be mitigated. Because the largest component of solar variability is known

— the path of the sun through the s ky

— this can be plan ned for in the unit commitment. The day

- ahead wind forecast e rror can be mitigated with a 4

- hour

- ahead commitment of gas units to take advantage of the improved forecasts.

• Although wind and solar affect the grid in very different ways, t heir impacts on system

wide production costs are remarkably similar.
**WWSIS**

**- 3**  Transient Stability

• System

- wide transient stability can be maintained with high levels of wind and solar generation if local stability, voltage, and thermal problems are addressed with traditional transmission system reinforcements (e.g., transformers, shunt capacitors, local lines). With these reinforcements, an 80% reduction in coal plant commitment, which drove simultaneous non

- synchronous penetration (SNSP) to 56%, resulted in acceptable transient stability performance.

• With further reinforcements, including nonstandard items such as synchronous condenser conversions, a 90% reduction in coa l plant commitment, which drove SNSP to 61%, resulted in acceptable transient stability pe rformance.

• Additional transmission and concentrating solar power generation with frequency

responsive controls are effective at improving transient stability

. Frequency Response

• System

- wide frequency response can be maintained with high levels of wind and solar generation if local stability, voltage, and thermal problems are addressed with traditional transmission system reinforcements (e.g., transformers, shunt capacitors, local lines).

• Limited application of nontraditional frequency

- responsive controls on wind, solar photovoltaic

, concentrating solar power plants, and energy storage are effective at improving both frequency nadir and settling frequency, and thus frequency response

. Refinements to these contro ls would further improve performance.

• Individual balancing authority area frequency response may not meet its obligation without additional frequency response from resources both inside and outside the particular area. As noted above, nontraditional approa ches are effective at improving frequency response . Current operating practice s use more traditional approaches (e.g., committing conventional plants with governors) to meet all frequency

- response needs.12

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. • Using new, fast

- responding resource technologies (e. g., inverter

- based controls) to ensure adequate frequency response adds complexity and flexibility to high levels of wind and solar generation. Control philosophy will need to evolve to take full advantage of easily adjustable speed of response, with addit ional consideration of the location and size of the generation trip.

• For California, adequate frequency response was maintained during acute depletion of headroom from the afternoon drop in solar production, assuming the ability of California hydro power to provide frequency response

. Additional Conclusions

• Accurate modeling of solar photovoltaic

, concentrating solar power , wind, and load behavior is extremely important when analyzing high

- stress conditions, because all of these models had an impact on system performance.

• Attention to detail is important. Local and locational issues may drive constraints on both frequency response and transient stability.

• The l ocation of generation tripping (e.g., distributed generation compared to a central station) is not as important as the amount of generation that is tripped ; h owever, widespread deliberate or common

- mode distributed generation tripping after a large disturbance has an adverse impact on system performance. It is recommended that practice adapt to take advantage of new provisions in IEEE 1547 that allow for voltage and frequency ride

- through of distributed generation to improve system stability.

• Further analysis is needed to determine operational limits with low levels of synchronous generation to ident ify changes to path ratings and associated remedial action schemes and quantify the impact of distributed generation on transmission system performance.

• Because a broad range of both conventional and nonstandard operation and control options improved syste m performance, further investigation of the most economic and effective alternatives is warranted. This should include consideration of the costs and benefits of constraining commitment and dispatch to reserve frequency response and the capital and operati ng costs of new controls and equipment. 

### Study Reports and Presentations

• Western Wind and Solar Integration Study website: http://www.nrel.gov/electricity/transmission/western_wi nd.html

• GE Energy, Western Wind and Solar Integration Study : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47434.pdf

• NREL
, The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 2 : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/55588.pdf

• GE Energy Management, The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 3 : Frequency Response and Transient Stability : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/62906.pdf

.13

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Eastern Frequency Response Study (2013) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis NERC is concerned about the transition from conventional thermal generation to wind and other

new sources of energy and reliability services, and frequency response is a topic of particular concern. This has motived the creation of NERC’s Essential Reliability Services Task Force. The Eastern Frequency Response Study ( EFRS ) specifically looked at this topic for the Eastern Interconnection in a way that informs both the modeling of the Eastern Interconnection as it exists today and how it would behave with a high level of wind penetration : 25% overall in the Eastern Interconnection , or 40% in the balance of the Eastern Interconnection NERC regions if the Southeast Electric Reliability Corporation (SERC) and the Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) are excluded from the calculation

. 

### Major A ssumptions

• Region: Eastern Interconnection

• Type: Frequency r esponse

• Time frame: 60

- second dynamic simulations

• Power flow: AC power flow

• Model: PSLF

• Transmission: Detailed model

• Broad changes to governor models so simulations match measurements

• 25% wind penetration across the Eastern Interconnection

• New wind generation replaced thermal generation at existing power plant sites

• No solar generation added 

### Summary of the A nalysis NREL teamed with GE to analyze the frequency response of the Eastern Interconnection under possible future system conditions wi th high levels of wind generation. The main goals of this work were to c reate a realistic baseline model of the Eastern Interconnection to examine frequency response , i nvestigate the possible impact of l arge amounts of wind generation, and

e xamine means to improve Eastern Interconnection frequency response by using active power controls on wind power plants.

The dynamic representation of the Eastern Interconnection is known to poorly reflect the observed behavior. To develop the desired benchmark system per formance, broad changes were made to models throughout the system. GE expertise on power plant control and operation were used to improve the standard database, particularly with regard to the possible root causes of the observed frequency response of the Eastern Interconnection . Power plant models for hundreds of plants across the interconnection were modified based on plant size, fuel, and turbine type. These changes were based on a general understanding of plant behavior, not on any knowledge of the
spec ific behavior of individual plants.14

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. To examine the possible impact of high levels of wind penetration on the Eastern Interconnection , new wind generation of approximate 85GW, operating at a total production of 68 GW, was added across all of the NERC regio ns except SERC and FRCC. This represent ed a wind penetration of approximately 40% for those regions and 25% for the Eastern Interconnection as a whole.

Modern wind turbines and wind power plants can contribute to frequency response with governor and inert ial response controls. These controls are commercially available and vary somewhat between suppliers. Their use is not widespread in North America at this time. Simulations in which these controls were enabled were examined to test mitigation options.


### Key F indings The dynamic model of the Eastern Interconnection can be adjusted to more closely capture observed behavior. The Eastern Interconnection model improvements made in this investigation

were n o t performed with the necessary rigor to be definitive. T he evidence indicate d that many generators must be operating differently than the current model from the multiregional modeling working group . Specifically, most machines must have their governors disabled or be equipped with load reference set

- point contr ols that defeat or diminish governor response

. A d etailed investigation of the performance of individual units in response to actual grid events is recommended

. The overall frequency response of the Eastern Interconnection is adequate for the cases examin ed. The overall frequency response of the Eastern Interconnection to a large system event is above the frequency response obligation currently proposed by NERC . This study was not intended to verify the performance of individual regions or balancing author it y areas

. None of the conditions that were examined, including cases with high levels of wind generation (up to 40 % penetration in all NERC regions except FRCC and SERC ), resulted in underfrequency load shedding or other stability problems

.
The fraction of generation providing governor control must be maintained above a minimum level. This study showed that t he fraction of generation participating in governor control, Kt, is a primary metric for expected performance . Broadly, maintaining a minimum Kt on t he order of 30% appears necessary, and it is consistent with other findings.

Governor withdrawal on thermal plants causes degradation in frequency response. Governor withdrawal occurs when a deliberate load control acts to nullify a plant’s governor respo nse. In this study, it caused a n approximate 44% degradation in frequency response for the case with approximately 30% of t he generation participating in governor control

. Approximately two

thirds of the responsive plants were affected, which is similar to levels found in NERC ’s work.

Governor response from wind power plants can provide significant primary frequency response. The systemic benefit of these responses can be several times greater per megawatt than was observed for governor response in the syn chronous fleet

. Curtailment of available wind generation to provide this service would represent a substantial opportunity cost to wind power plant owners . Governor controls for wind power plants are commercially available, but at present they are not used on wind power plants in the Eastern Interconnection.15

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Inertial controls on wind power plants can improve the frequency nadir. Reduction in system inertia resulting from higher penetration s of renewable generation per se may not have a significant impact on frequency response when compared to governor action . F ast transient frequency support via controlled inertial response from wind turbines, however, was shown to significantly improve the frequency nadir.

Damping of inter

- area oscillations in the Eastern Interconnection tended to improve with wind penetration ; h owever, further analysis is necessary to determine whether this because of the increasing wind penetration, the associated decommi tment of thermal generation, or modeling inaccuracies. Such analytical efforts can be performed in conjunction with improvements to the Eastern Interconnection model fidelity.

Frequency response of the Eastern Interconnection for this challenging condition with high levels of wind generation met current standards of performance. Operational options using both synchronous generation and wind power plant controls can beneficially affect system performance. C hanges to operational procedures, markets

, and interconnection requirements could be needed to avoid frequency response problem s in the future

. 

### Study Reports and Presentations

• GE Energy, Eastern Frequency Response Study : http://www.nrel.go v/docs/fy13osti/58077.pdf

.16

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study (2010) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis
The Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study ( EWITS ) was the first wind integration study of this scope . It considered the ent ire Eastern Interconnection and initially focused on 20% wind penetration scenarios but added a 30% scenario as well.


### Major A ssumptions

• Region: Eastern Interconnection

— ISO

- NE, NYISO, MISO, PJM, SERC, Southwest Power Pool

, and Tennessee Valley Authority

• Type: Production s imulation

• Temporal r esolution: Hourly, with limited 15

- minute resolution

• Transmission r epresentation: Zonal

Production c ost m odeling

• Power flow: DC

• Model: PROMOD IV Reliability m odeling

• Power flow: Transportation m odel

• Model: GE Energy M ulti

- Area Reliability Simulation (GE

- MARS) Capacity e xpansion

• Model: Electric Generation Expansion Analysis System ( EGEAS )

• Reserves: Regulating (1% of load), f lexibility (1% of load)

• Fuel Prices (vary regionally): Average $2 .45 /MBTU coal; a verage $ 15.84 /MBTU natural
gas

• Regional c ooperation: Extensive 

### Summary of the A nalysis The U.S. Department of Energy commissioned EWITS through NREL. The investigation began in 2007

, and the resultant report was published in 2010 . The study was the first of its kind in terms of scope, scale, and process. It was designed to answer questions posed by a variety of stakeholders about a range of important and contemporary technical issues related to a 20% wind scenario for the large portion of the electric load (demand for energy) that resides in the Eastern Interconnection. The Eastern Interconnection is one of three synchronous grids covering the lower 48 U.S. states. It extends roughly from the western borders of the Plains states through to the Atlantic coast, excluding most of Texas.17

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. To set an appropriate backdrop to address the key study questions, the EWITS project team

— with input from a wide range of project stakeholders

, including the t echnical r eview

c ommittee

— carefully constructed four high

- penetration scenarios to represent different wind generation development possibilities in the Eastern Interconnection. Three of these scenarios delivered a wind energy equivalent of 20% of the projected annual electrical energy requirements in 2024; the fourth scenario incr eased the amount of wind energy to 30%

. 

### Key F indings

• High penetrations of wind generation

— from 20% to 30% of the electrical energy requirements of the Eastern Interconnection

— are technically feasible with significant expansion of the transmission infrastructure.

• New transmission will be required for all future wind scenarios in the Eastern Interconnection, including the r eference c ase. Planning for this transmission is imperative

, because it takes longer to build new transmission capacity than it does to build new wind power plants.

• Without transmission enhancements, substantial curtailment (shutting down) of wind generation would be required for all of the 20% scenarios.

• I nterconnection

- wide costs for integrating large amounts of wind generation are manageable with large regional operating pools and significant market, tariff, and operational changes.

• Transmission helps reduce the impacts of the variability of the wind, which reduces wind integration costs, increases reliability of the electrical grid, and helps make more efficient use of the available generation resources. Although costs for aggressive expansions of the existing grid are significant, they comprise a relatively small portion of the total annualized costs in any of the scenarios studied.

• Carbon em ission reductions in the three 20% wind scenarios did not vary by much, indicating that wind displace d coal in all scenarios and that coal generation is not significantly exported from the Midwest to the eastern United States

. C arbon emissions

were reduced at an increased rate in the 30% wind scenario as more gas generation was used to accommodate wind variability. Wind generation displace d carbon

- based fuels, directly reducing CO 2 emissions. Emissions continue d to decline as more wind was added to the supp ly picture. Increasing the cost of carbon in the analysis result ed in higher total production costs and higher reductions. For example, CO 2 emissions were reduced by 1 9% with 30% wind and no carbon price, but by 32% with 20% wind in the carbon price scenar io. 

### Study Reports and Presentations

• EnerNex Corporation, Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/47078.pdf

.18

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Renewable Electricity Futures Study (2012) Relevance to NERC and EPA CPP Analysis
The Renewable Electricity Futures (REF) Study went well beyond the level of the EPA CPP by considering the capability and issues for obtaining 30 % to 90% of U.S. electricity generation from renewable energy. Reduction s in annual greenhouse gas emissions of approximately 80% (on a direct combustion basis and on a full life

- cycle basis) and in annual power sector water use of approximately 50% were found for the scenarios of obtaining 80% renewables by 2050.



### Overview

REF was an initial investigation of the extent to which renewable energy supply can meet the electricity demands of the contiguous United States throughout the next several decades. This study include d geographic and electric system operation resolution that was unprecedented for long

- term studies of the U.S. electric sector. The analysis examine d the implications and challenges of renewabl e electricity generation levels in 2015

— from 30% up to 90%, with a focus on 80%, of all U.S. electricity generat ion from renewable technologies . At such high levels of renewable electricity penetration, the unique characteristics of some renewable resources, specifically geographical distribution and variability and uncertainty in output, pose challenges to the operability o f the U.S. electric system. The study focuse d on some key technical implications of this environment, exploring whether the U.S. power system can supply electricity to meet customer demand with high levels of renewable electricity, including variable wind and solar generation. The study also began to address the potential economic, environmental, and social implications of deploying and integrating high levels of renewable electricity in the United States. REF was led by a team from NREL and the Massachuset ts Institute of Technology (MIT), and it is the culmination of contributions from more than 110 individuals representing more than 35 organizations.


### Major A ssumptions The NREL Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) capacity expansion model and the ABB G ridView production cost model were the primary tools used in the study. ReEDS is a linear programming capacity expansion and dispatch model for the contiguous United States. It is a sequential optimization model that simulates the evolution of the U.S. pow er system from 2010 to 2050 using high spatial resolution (134 model balancing authority areas and 356 wind/solar regions) and a statistical framework for estimating capacity value, increased operating reserve needs from renewables, and renewable curtailme nt. GridView is a security

- constrained unit commitment and economic dispatch model with hourly time resolution and zonal DC power flow transmission ( among the same 134 balancing authority areas ). E conomic dispatch was assumed at the national le vel in both GridView and ReEDS; however, planning and operating reserves were still assumed to be maintained regionally

. The generation expansion model uses an LOLE target to ensure long

- term reliability of supply. The Gridview model was used to assess whether the sys tem could be balanced under the study assumptions. No dynamic stability or N

- 1 reliability analysis was done in this study.

The study relied on 27 separate scenarios, including b aselines and scenarios with prescribed amounts of renewable energy penetration in 2050 ranging from 30% to 90%. The study focuse d19

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. on 80%

- by

- 2050 renewable energy scenarios, including up to nearly 50% variable generation. GridView was used to analyze a subset of these scenarios.


### Summary of the A nalysis

• Region: Contiguous United Stat es

• Type: Capacity e xpansion and p roduction s imulation

• Temporal Resolution: Expansion to 2050, hourly dispatch

• Transmission: Expansion estimated in ReEDS

• Power flow: Zonal DC

• Model: ReEDS, GridView

• Reserves: Spinning, regulating

, f orecast e rror

• Technology and f uel p rices: Range of sensitivities explored

• Regional c ooperation: Nationwide dispatch with regional reserves 

### Key F indings **Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies**

• Renewable energy resources, accessed with commercially available generatio n technologies, could adequately supply 80% of total U.S. electricity generation in 2050 while balancing supply and demand at the hourly level.

• All regions of the United States could contribute substantial renewable electricity supply in 2050 , consistent with their local renewable resource base

.

• Multiple technology pathways exist to achieve a high renewable electricity future. Assumed constraints that limit power transmission infrastructure, grid flexibility, or the use of particular types of resources can be compensated for through the use of other resources, technologies, and approaches.

• Annual renewable capacity additions that enable high renewable generation are consistent with current global production capacities but are significantly higher than recen t U.S. annual capacity additions for the technologies considered

. N o insurmountable long

- term constraints to renewable electricity technology manufacturing capacity, materials supply,

or labor availability were identified.

o The analysis showed that achievi ng high renewable electricity future s would require a sustained increase in renewable capacity additions. In the core 80% renewable energy scenarios, average annual renewable capacity additions from 19 GW/yr to 22 GW/y r from 2011 to 2020 were estimated, in creasing to a maximum
rate from 32 GW/yr to 46 GW/yr from 2041 to 2050. **Grid Operability and Hourly Resource Adequacy**

• Electricity supply and demand can be balanced in every hour of the year in each region with nearly 80% electricity from renewable resources, including nearly 50% from20

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. variable renewable generation, according to simulations of 2050 power system operations.

• Additional challenges to power system planning and operation s would arise in a high renewable elec tricity future, including management of low

- demand periods and curtailment of excess electricity generation

.

o The hourly dispatch analysis estimated that overall in 2050, from 8 % to 10% of wind, solar, and hydropower generation would need to be curtailed in an 80%

- by

2050 renewable energy (with nearly 50% variable generation) scenario.

• Electric sector modeling show ed that a more flexible system is needed to accommodate increasing levels of renewable generation. System flexibility can be increased using a bro ad portfolio of supply

- and demand

- side options, and it will likely require technology advances, new operating procedures, evolved business models, and new market rules. **Reliability**

• All studies that examined balancing found that the system could be balanc ed with no unserved demand.

• Most studies did not examine dynamic stability or N

- 1 analysis ; h owever, analysis described here on the Eastern and Western Interconnections found no reliability problems for the cases analyzed.

• Reliability from a resource adequ acy perspective using LOLE targets was part of some studies.

• As a whole, these studies suggest that reliable operation can be achieved under high renewable penetrations ; h owever, not all cases have been studied, and specific analyses of other scenarios would be needed.

**Transmission Expansion**

• As renewable electricity generation increases, additional transmission infrastructure is required to deliver generation from cost

- effective remote renewable resources to load centers, enable reserve sharing over grea ter distances, and smooth output profiles of variable resources by enabling greater geospatial diversity. **Cost and Environmental Implications of High Renewable Electricity Futures**

• High renewable electricity futures can result in deep reductions in electric sector greenhouse gas emissions and water use.

o Reductions in annual greenhouse gas emissions of approximately 80% (on a direct combustion basis and on a full life

- cycle basis) and in annual power sector
water use of approximately 50% were found for the 80 %

- by

- 2050 renewable
energy scenarios

.

o Greenhouse

- gas reductions in 2030 were found to be approximately 40% relative to the 2010 b aseline.21

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. • The direct incremental cost associated with high renewable generation is comparable to published cost estimates of ot her clean energy scenarios. Improvement in the cost and performance of renewable technolo gies is the most impactful lever for reducing this incremental cost.
**Effects of Demand Growth**

• With higher demand growth, high levels of renewable generation present i ncreased

resource and grid integration challenges. 

### Study Reports and Presentations

• Renewable Electricity Futures Study w ebsite: http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/re_futures/

• NREL, Renewable Electricity F utures: Executive Summary : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/52409

- ES.pdf

• NREL, Renewable Electricity Futures: Volume 1

— Exploration of High

- Penetration Renewable Electricity Futures : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/52409

- 1.pdf

• NREL, Renewable Electricity Futures: Volume 2

— Renewable Electricity Generation and Storage Technologies : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/52409

- 2.pdf

• NREL, Renewable Electricity Futures: Volume 3

— End Use Electricity Demand : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/52409

- 3.pdf

• NREL, Re newable Electricity Futures: Volume 4

— Bulk Electric Power Systems: Operations and Transmission Planning : http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/52409

- 4.pdf

.22

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Conclusion
This paper provided a series of high

- level summaries of recent studies that have quantified variable generation emission reductions that are largely compliant with the proposed EPA 111(d) CPP rule. These studies examined significantly high wind and solar penetration rates, ranging fr om 20% to 50% of annual energy demand. Each of the studies utilized production simulation tools that are capable of calculating carbon emission impacts based on thermal plant operating characteristics. Carbon reductions generally range d from 20 % to 40% and resulted from wind and solar energy penetrations that were generally from 20 % to 40% of annual energy. Note that REF had higher penetrations and higher emission reductions. All studies that used production simulation tools found that electricity demand ca n be served at all times. Some studies performed LOLE analysis, and a few of the most recent studies examined issues such as dynamic stability.

These studies represent the analysis of potential paths to achieving the EPA 111(d) objective, but there are oth er approaches we did not evaluate. However, as the power system industry moves forward in analyzing the potential reliability impacts of the proposed EPA rule, these studies can help shed light on some of the important issues.23

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 

## Bibli o graphy
Arent, D.; Pless, J.; Mai, T.; Wiser, R.; Hand, M.; Baldwin, S.; Heath, G.; Macknick, J.; Bazilian, M.; Schlosser, A.; Denholm, P. (2014). “ Implications of High Renewable Electricity Penetration in the U.S. for Water Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land

- Use , and Materials Supply. ” Applied Energy ( 123 ) , June 15; pp. 368

– 377

. NREL / JA

- 6A20

- 59175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.022

. Bazilian, M.; Mai, T.; Baldwin, S.; Arent, D.; Mille r, M.; Logan, J. (2014). “ Decision

- Making for High Renewable Electricity Futures in the United States. ” Energy Strategy Reviews ( 2 : 3

– 4), February; pp. 326

– 328

. NREL / JA

- 6A50

- 60738. http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/j.esr.2013.11.001

. Cochran, J.; Mai, T.; Bazilian, M. (2014). “ Meta

- Analysis of High

- Penetration Renewable Energy Scenarios. ” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews ( 29 ) , January; pp. 246

– 253

. NREL / JA

- 6A20

- 58764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.089

. Denholm, P.; Margolis, R.; Mai, T.; Brinkman, G.; Drury, E.; Hand, M.; Mowers, M. (2013).

“ Bright Future: Solar Power as a Major Contributor to the U.S. Grid. ” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine ( 11 : 2), March; pp. 22

– 32

. NREL / JA

- 6A20

- 57243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2012.2234404

. EnerNex Corporation. (2011). Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study

. Knoxville, T N. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/47078.pdf

. GE Energy. (2010). Executive Summary

— Final Report: New England Wind Integration Study

. Schenectady, NY. http://variablegen.org/wp

- content/uploads/2013/01/newis_es.pdf

. GE Energy. (2010). Final Report: New England Wind Integration Study. Schenectady, NY. http://variablegen.org/wp

- content/uploads/2013/01/newis_report.pdf

. GE Energy. (2010). Western Wind and Solar Integration Study . Schenectady, NY. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47434.pdf

. GE Energy. (2014). Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission Study: Final Report

. Schenectady, NY. https://mn.gov/c ommerce/energy/images/final

- mrits

- report

- 2014.pdf

. GE Energy. (2014). PJM Renewable Integration Study

. Schenectady, NY. https://www.pjm.com/committees

- and

- groups/subcomm ittees/irs/pris.aspx

. GE Energy. (2014). The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 3 : Frequency Response and Transient Stability

. Schenectady, NY. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/62906 .pdf

. Lew, D.; Brinkman, G.; Ibanez, E.; Florita, A.; Heaney, M.; Hodge, B.

- M.; Hummon, M.; Stark, G.; King, J.; Lefton, S.A.; Kumar, N.; Agan, D.; Jordan, G.; Venkataraman, S. (2013). The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 2

. Golden, CO: Natio nal Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/55588.pdf

.24

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Mai, T.; Hand, M. M.; Baldwin, S. F.; Wiser, R. H.; Brinkman, G. L.; Denholm, P.; Arent, D. J.; Porro, G.; Sandor, D.; Hostick, D. J.; Milligan, M.; DeMeo, E. A.; Bazilian, M. (2014). Renewable Electricity Futures for the United States

. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy ( 5 : 2), April; pp. 372

– 378; NREL / JA

- 6A20

- 58804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2013.2290472

. Mai, T.; Mulcahy, D.; Hand, M. M.; Baldwin, S. F. (2014). “ Envisioning a Renewable Electricity Future for the United States. ” Energy ( 65 ) , February 1 ; pp. 374

– 386

. NREL / JA

6A20

- 58511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.029

. Miller, N.W.; Shao, M.; Pajic, S.; D’Aquila, R. (2013). Eastern Frequency Response Study

. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/58077.pdf . Schenectady, NY: GE Energy.

National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2012). Renewable Electricity Futures Study. Hand, M.M.; Baldwin, S.; DeMeo, E.; Reilly, J.M.; Mai, T.; Arent, D.; Porro, G.; Meshek, M.; Sa ndor, D. eds. 4 vols. NREL/TP

- 6A20

- 52409. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.