alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Mary W. Patterson, chief executive officer of Trans-Century Resources,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form
10-QSB of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), (i)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company.



                                  By: /s/ Mary W. Patterson
                                      ------------------------
                                  Name:  Mary W. Patterson
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                  Date:  January 24, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41464

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JULIE VONDELL DRAKE ARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-169-4

- - - - - - - - - -

August 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Julie Vondell Drake Ard appeals her conviction for

participating in a conspiracy to transport stolen money in

interstate commerce and for knowingly receiving in interstate

commerce stolen money. She challenges the sufficiency of the

evidence supporting her conviction, arguing that the jury should

not have believed the testimony of the chief witness against her.
No. 98-41464

- 2 -

 Ard did not move for a judgment of acquittal after the

Government rested or after the close of evidence. Accordingly,

the standard of review is whether there was a manifest

miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Thomas, 12 F.3d

1350, 1358 (5th Cir. 1994). 

 The jury has the sole responsibility for determining the

weight and credibility of the evidence. United States v.

Landerman, 109 F.3d 1053, 1067-68 (5th Cir. 1997), modified on

other grounds, 116 F.3d 119 (5th Cir. 1997). The jury’s verdict

did not result in a manifest miscarriage of justice. 

 AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Canyonlands National Park

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(15)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(46)
              - multimedia_image(37)
              - multimedia_image-141771(36)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(7)

## By Location

## By Year

Center News        December 7, 2023        FORT scientists host the second annual Big Rivers Data Integration Workshop
Erma Jean WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CinderCone

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

## By Year

publication        July 1, 1994        Minimal Pliocene-Pleistocene uplift of the dry valleys sector of the Transantarctic Mountains: A key parameter in ice-sheet reconstructions
The Attorney General of Texas 

August 5, 1980 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Honorable George N. Rodriguei 

Bl Paso County Attorney 

Courthouse 

El Paso, Texas 

Opinion No. MW-218 

Re: Responsibility for transportation of prisoners to the Texas 

Department of Corrections 

Dear Mr. Rodriguez: 

You have requested our opinion regard@ responsibility for the cost of 

transporting prisoners to the Texas Department of Corrections. Article 

6166r, V.T.C.S., provides: 

The manager [now the Director of the Department 

of Correctionslshall make suitable provision and 

regulations for the safe and speedy transportation of 

prisoners from counties where sentenced to the State 

penitentiary by the sheriffs of such respective 

counties if such sheriffs are willing to perform such 

services as cheaolv as said commission can have it 

done otherwise. bhd transportation shaB be on State 

account and. in no instance shall the prisoners be 

carried direct ftom the county jails to the State 

farm, but shall first be carried- to the receivitlg 

station as designated by the Prison Board [now Board 

of Corrections] where the character of labor which 

each prisoner may reasonably perform shall be determined. Upon the arrival of each prisoner at such 

receivin8 station, the manager shall cause a statement to be made by the prisoner, givim~ a brief 

history of his life, and showing where he has resided, 

the names and post-office addresses of his immediate 

relatives, and such other facts as will tend to show 

his past habits and character; and the manager shall, 

by correspondence, or otherwise verify or disprove 

such statements, if practicable, Andy shall preserve 

the record and information SD obtained for future 

reference. 

(Emphasis added). 

P. 696 
, 

Honorable George N. Rodriguez - Page TWO (NW-218) 

In Attorney General Opinion WW-651(1959), this office said that article 6166r: 

places the primary duty of transporting State prisoners from the 

various counties where held to the State Penitentiary upon the 

Texas Department of Corrections. 

The statute permits the director of the Department of Corrections to contract with 

the sheriff for the purpose of transporting its prisoners, but, when such an agreement 

is in effect, 

it is up to the Prison System to pay him such compensation as 

was agreed upon between the parties. 

Attorney General Opinion O-1808 (1940). See also, Attorney General Opinion O-724 

(1939). We conclude therefore that the Texas Department of Corrections is responsible 

for the agreed cost of transporting prisoners from a county to a facility of the 

Department. 

SUMMARY 

The Texas Department of Corrections is responsible for the 

agreed cost of transporting prisoners from a county to a facility 

of the Department. 

velYtr~.s 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Rick Gilpin 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMlTTEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

Jim Allison 

Jon Bible 

Gerald Carruth 

Walter Davis 

Susan Garrison 

Rick Gilpin 

Bruce Youngblood 

p. 697
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Big Data Analysis

Filters

              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(10)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(33)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - hawaii(12)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(22)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - (-)utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 30, 2017        A Record of Change: Science and Elder Observations on the Navajo N.

Featured Films and Shorts        February 21, 2010        The Heat is On: Desert Tortoises and Survival (Full video)
Plant ID Plant Name Street Address City State

51030 Ocean State Power 1575 Sherman Farm Road Harrisville RI

54324 Ocean State Power II 1575 Sherman Farm Road Harrisville RI

55952 Las Vegas Cogeneration LP II 1701 Alexander Rd North Las Vegas NV

10761 Las Vegas Cogen LP 1701 E Alexander RD North Las Vegas NV

54035 Roanoke Valley Energy Facililty I 290 Power Place, PO Box 351 Weldon NC

54755 Roanoke Valley Energy Facility II 290 Power Place, PO Box 351 Weldon NC

8073 Beaver 80997 Kallunki Rd Clatskanie OR

56227 Port Westward 80997 Kallunki Rd Clatskanie OR

2497 Indian Point 2 Broadway & Bleakley Ave Buchanan NY

8907 Indian Point 3 Broadway Bleakley Avenue Buchanan NY

55710 Allegheny Energy Units 3 4 & 5 Butler Street Exit Springdale PA

3182 Springdale Power Station Butler Street Ext Springdale PA
Operator Name

Regulatory 

Status Owner Name

Ocean State Power Co NR TransCanada Power Div-Engy Ltd

Ocean State Power II NR TransCanada Power Div-Engy Ltd

Black Hills Ops LLC NR Black Hills Ops LLC

Black Hills Ops LLC NR Black Hills Ops LLC

Westmoreland Partners NR Westmoreland Partners

Westmoreland Partners NR Westmoreland Partners

Portland General Electric Co RE Portland General Electric Co

Portland General Electric Co RE Portland General Electric Co

Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 NR Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2

Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3 NR Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3

Allegheny Energy Supply Co LLC NR Allegheny Energy Supply Co LLC

Allegheny Energy Supply Co LLC NR Allegheny Energy Supply Co LLC
Linda M. FEHLING, Appellant, v. David K. FEHLING Sr., Appellee.

No. 1D18-2762

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 18, 2018

Linda M. Fehling, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).

Wolf, Rowe, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Eva M. RIQUELME, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Miami Lakes Am, LLC, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4664

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Big Data Analysis

Filters

              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(10)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(33)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - (-)hawaii(12)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(22)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        December 1, 2020        Largest Gravity Changes Ever Recorded: 2018 Kīlauea Eruption

Presentations and Events        September 18, 2017        Rainfall Variability and Drought in the Hawaiian Islands

Photography        March 17, 2015        Geologist collects a sample of slow-moving lava flow, Kīlauea

Presentations and Events        January 19, 2022        Volcano Awareness Month 2022 Short Feature — HVO’s ongoing recovery from the 2018 Kīlauea events

Presentations and Events        January 7, 2020        Transitions: What's next for HVO and the volcanoes it monitors?

Presentations and Events        August 30, 2018        PubTalk 8/2018 — What on Earth is going on at Kilauea Volcano?

How to's and trainings        November 30, 2023        PubTalk-11/2023: Six Eruptions at Two Volcanoes Over the Past Three Years

Presentations and Events        April 26, 2016        Observing Changing Recreational Seascapes in Hawai'i

Photography        May 31, 2014        Monitoring Volcanic Gases on Kilauea's East Rift Zone

Photography        May 31, 2014        Monitoring Volcanic Gases on Kilauea's East Rift Zone II

Presentations and Events        November 29, 2018        Impact of Future Climate and Non-Natives on HI's Aquatic Ecosystems

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2017        Kīlauea Summit Eruption | Lava Returns to Halemaʻumaʻu
Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-399

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Casey James WALDRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Temitope EPOYUN, Appellant, v. PMI MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 2, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.43
-------------

                 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RES-PBGC MEMORANDUM OF
                      UNDERSTANDING DATED NOVEMBER 2, 1998

         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to the RES-PBGC Memorandum of Understanding by
and between the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and RES Holding Corporation
is made and entered into as of this 15th day of March, 2000, by and between the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and Republic Technologies International,
LLC.

                                   WITNESSETH
                                   ----------

WHEREAS, by last signature dated November 2, 1998, RES Holding Corporation
("RES") and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU"); and

WHEREAS, all events under clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 1 of the MOU have
occurred, including the Combination of RES and RESI under a common ultimate
parent, such ultimate parent being Republic Technologies International, LLC
("RTI"); and

WHEREAS, under the MOU, RTI must make certain "Required Contributions,"
including a payment of $7,500,000 on January 1, 2000; and

WHEREAS, effective December 29, 1999, RES and PBGC executed an Amendment of the
MOU; and

WHEREAS, under the Amendment, PBGC agreed to allow RES to defer $5,500,000 of
the January 1, 2000 payment until March 15, 2000;

NOW THEREFORE, RTI and PBGC agree to the following:

1. Subsections (b) and (c) of section 3 of the MOU are further amended as
follows:

         (a)      to change the new row added by the Amendment to each table,
                  with the words "no later than 3/15/00" in the contribution
                  "Date" column, to read "no later than 3/22/00."


                                       1
<PAGE>   2



2. Except as the MOU is modified by this Second Amendment, the MOU remains
unchanged and in full force and effect, and the parties hereby ratify and affirm
the MOU as modified hereby.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and agreed as of the date first
written above.


                              PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION




DATE: March 15, 2000          BY:/s/ Andrea Schneider
      -----------------         ------------------------------------
                                ANDREA SCHNEIDER, CHIEF NEGOTIATOR AND DIRECTOR
                                CORPORATE FINANCE AND NEGOTIATIONS DEPARTMENT





                              REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, LLC




Date: March 15, 2000           By:/s/ Joseph F. Lapinsky
      -----------------           --------------------------
Nygel HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB of Henley
      Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Herbert
      Moeller, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:
      March 26, 2007


HERBERT
      MOELLER


Herbert
      Moeller


Chief
      Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director








-1-
Fredrick Vernel JENNINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3660

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5320 

To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers on documents 

sent by mail by the Social Security Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2016 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mr. RENACCI) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers 

on documents sent by mail by the Social Security Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Must 

5 Avert Identity Loss (MAIL) Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUM7 BERS IN DOCUMENTS SENT BY MAIL. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(c)(2)(C) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)) is amended by add10 ing at the end the following: 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5320 IH

1 ‘‘(xiv)(I) The Commissioner of Social Security shall 

2 ensure that no document sent by mail by the Social Secu3 rity Administration includes a complete social security ac4 count number unless the Commissioner determines that 

5 inclusion of such complete number is necessary. 

6 ‘‘(II) Not later than 30 days after the date of the 

7 enactment of this clause and not later than each of March 

8 31 and September 30 of each year following the year in 

9 which such date of enactment occurs, the Commissioner 

10 of Social Security shall submit to the Committee on Ways 

11 and Means of the House of Representatives and the Com12 mittee on Finance of the Senate a report on the implemen13 tation of subclause (I). Such report shall include— 

14 ‘‘(aa) the title and identification number of 

15 each document used by the Social Security Adminis16 tration during the previous year on which is printed 

17 an individual’s complete social security account num18 ber; 

19 ‘‘(bb) the most recent date on which each such 

20 document was updated; and 

21 ‘‘(cc) the projected date on which complete so22 cial security account numbers will be removed from 

23 each such document, or if the Commissioner deter24 mines that inclusion of such complete number is nec25 essary, the rationale for such determination.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5320 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef2 fect as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    260
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          260
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  25,228
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                            (25,968)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              260
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)



</TABLE>