95180 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 

9 Id. 

1See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results and 

Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 55550 (July 5, 

2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 12, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 18, 2024. 

5See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Deer Park 

Glycine, LLC,’’ dated August 5, 2024; see also 

Kumar’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated August 12, 

2024. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 

Glycine from India; 2022,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

7See Glycine from India and the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 

FR 29173 (June 21, 2019) (Order). 

8 Id. at 2. 

9See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; see also section 

771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 

771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 

10As discussed in the Preliminary Results and 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, Commerce has 

found the following companies to be cross-owned 

with Kumar Industries, India: Advance Chemical 

Corporation, Rexisize Rasayan Industries, and 

Reliance Corporation. 

likely to prevail would be margins up to 

44.35 percent.9

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return/destruction or 

conversion to judicial protective order 

of proprietary information disclosed 

under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: November 25, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary

II. Background

III. Scope of the Order

IV. History of the Order

V. Legal Framework

VI. Discussion of the Issues

1. Likelihood of Continuation or

Recurrence of Dumping

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to

Prevail

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review

VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2024–28174 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–884] 

Glycine From India: Final Results of 

the Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies were provided 

to Kumar Industries, India (Kumar), a 

producer and exporter of glycine from 

India during the period of review (POR) 

January 1, 2022, through December 31, 

2022. 

DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scarlet Jaldin or Amber Hodak AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4275 or (202) 482–8034,

respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 5, 2024, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review.1 On July 22, 

2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.2 On 

November 12, 2024, Commerce 

extended the deadline for these final 

results to November 19, 2024.3 On 

November 18, 2024, Commerce further 

extended the deadline for these final 

results by an additional three days, to 

November 22, 2024.4 We received 

timely filed case and rebuttal briefs from 

Deer Park Glycine, LLC (the petitioner) 

and Kumar.5 For a complete description 

of the events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.6

Scope of the Order 7

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is glycine from India. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues 

addressed is attached as an appendix to 

this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access/trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the arguments raised and a 

review of the record and all supporting 

documentation, we made certain 

changes to the Preliminary Results. For 

a full description of these revisions, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each of the subsidy programs found to 

be countervailable, Commerce finds that 

there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial 

contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that 

gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, 

and that the subsidy is specific.9 For a 

full description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, including 

any determination that relied upon the 

use of adverse facts available pursuant 

to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see 

the accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following countervailable subsidy rate 

exists for the period January 1, 2022, 

through December 31, 2022:10

Company 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

Kumar Industries, India; Advance Chemical Corporation; 

Rexisize Rasayan Industries; 

Reliance Corporation .............. 6.03 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose its 

calculations and analysis performed to 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 95181 

interested parties for these final results 

within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of the notice of final 

results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 

(a)(2)(C) of the act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(2), Commerce has 

determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries for the above-listed companies at 

the applicable ad valorem assessment 

rates. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the publication 

of the final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties for each 

of the companies listed above on 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

all-others rate or the most recent 

company-specific rate applicable to the 

company, as appropriate. These cash 

deposit instructions, effective upon 

publication of these final results, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing the final results 

and publishing this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 22, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Subsidies Valuation Information 

V. Analysis of Programs 

VI. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to 

Kumar 

Comment 2: Whether Kumar Violated 18 

U.S.C. 1001 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–28150 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is automatically initiating 

the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) 

of the antidumping and countervailing 

duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended 

investigation(s) listed below. The U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) is 

publishing concurrently with this notice 

its notice of Institution of Five-Year 

Reviews which covers the same order(s) 

and suspended investigation(s). 

DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Commerce official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. For 

information from the ITC, contact Mary 

Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission at (202) 

205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 

13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 

62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to Commerce’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping 

Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 

Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 

2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with section 751(c) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are 

initiating the Sunset Reviews of the 

following antidumping and 

countervailing duty order(s) and 

suspended investigation(s): 

DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact 

A–570–097 ............ 731–TA–1429 ........ China ..................... Polyester Textured Yarn (1st Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

A–533–885 ............ 731–TA–1430 ........ India ....................... Polyester Textured Yarn (1st Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

C–570–098 ............ 701–TA–612 .......... China ..................... Polyester Textured Yarn Mary 

Kolberg (1st Review).

Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

C–533–886 ............ 701–TA–613 .......... India ....................... Polyester Textured Yarn (1st Review) Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Commerce’s 

regulations, Commerce’s schedule for 

Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on Commerce’s website at the 

following address: https://enforcement.

trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in 

these Sunset Reviews must be filed in 

accordance with Commerce’s 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1