alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.4



                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2001-B
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2001-B and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of November
1, 2001 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture .

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and convenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2003.

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2001-B
                     BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                     capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                     /s/ Mary Kay Pupillo
                     ------------------------------------
                     Name: Mary Kay Pupillo
                     Title: Senior Financial Services Officer

         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                     CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                     NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                     /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                     -----------------------------------
                     Richard J. Naeder
                     Authorized Signatory
# C_2021294EN.01007701.xml

| 23.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/77

---

P9_TA(2020)0028

EU-Viet Nam Investment Protection Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, of the other part (05931/2019 — C9-0020/2019 — 2018/0358(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 294/12)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05931/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05931/2019),

| — | having regard to draft Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, of the other part (05932/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to draft Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, of the other part (05932/2019),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0020/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0020/2019),

| — | having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 12 February 2020 (1) on the draft decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 12 February 2020 (1) on the draft decision,

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Development, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Development,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0002/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0002/2020),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---

(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P9_TA(2020)0029.

---
Dorothy M. NELSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. RICHFIELD COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2977

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
From: Chuck French [French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 1:00 PM

To: Marinshaw, Richard

Cc: Hancy, Cindy Wang; Raymond, Gabrielle; Phil Mulrine

Subject: Re: FW: Cr_Elec_Work_5

- 21

- 12.doc

I called Plating Perceptions (in Twinsburg Ohio)and talked with a guy

working at the plant and then I

talked to their consultant. They are open and operating. They also said

they have very good controls

(triple mesh pads) that was installed somewhere about 1998. The most

recent emission tests were done

in 2007. The results for their 2 tanks were 0.0025 mg/dscm (for tank #5),

and about 0.002 mg/dscm (for

tank #3). He said he would try to send the actual test results next week.

He said the values in our table 4

(0.015 and 0.017) were either errors or were from older tests done before

they put the controls on..

Thanks.

Chuck French

Group Leader

Metals and Inorganic Chemicals Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA

Phone: 919

- 541

- 7912
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2005)]
[Corrections]
[Page 77260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z5-7721]



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / 
Corrections

[[Page 77260]]



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Overview 
Information, Vocational Rehabilitation Services, Projects for American 
Indians With Disabilities; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards 
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2006

Correction

    In notice document E5-7721 beginning on page 76044 in the issue of 
Thursday, December 22, 2005 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 76044, in the second column, under Deadline for 
Transmittal of Applications:,``April 21, 2005'' should read, ``April 
21, 2006''.
    2. On page 76045, in the third column, under 3. Sumission Dates and 
Times:, in the third line, ``April 21, 2005'' should read, ``April 21, 
2006''.

[FR Doc. Z5-7721 Filed 12-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 39
          - [Docket No. FAA-2008-0175; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-105-AD; Amendment 39-15455; AD 2008-08-03]
          - RIN 2120-AA64

      ( print page 26475)    

### Correction

In rule document E8-7167 beginning on page 19967 in the issue of Monday, April 14, 2008 make the following correction:

§ 39.13

On page 19968, in § 39.13(f), in the second line, “service May 19, 2008” should read “service after May 19, 2008”.

[FR Doc. Z8-7167 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Transmission of atmospherically deposited trace elements through an undeveloped, forested Maryland watershed      

      January 1, 1998    

Retention and transmission of atmospherically-derived major (H+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3-, NO3-, SO4-2, Cl-, SiO﻿2) and trace (Al, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn) species were evaluated in an undeveloped forested watershed underlain by a rather inert quartzite lithology (Bear Branch, Catoctin State Forest, Thrumont, Maryland). These comparisons were based on atmospheric input to stream export over a period of 16 months. Both wet (precipitation) and total (bulk, including vegetative throughfall) atmospheric loading to the catchment were determined. Stream export was gauged based on systematic sampling of the stream under varied flow regimes. Additionally, watershed export of both dissolved and particulate trace element phases was examined during three high run-off intensives associated with summer storms.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kathryn M Conko

##### Physical Scientist - QMS

Energy and Minerals Mission Area

kmconko@usgs.gov

703-648-6465

####             Karen C. Rice, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Hydrologist

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

## Related Content

#### Kathryn M Conko

##### Physical Scientist - QMS

Energy and Minerals Mission Area

kmconko@usgs.gov

703-648-6465

####             Karen C. Rice, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Hydrologist

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

### Contact

#### Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

1730 East Parham RoadRichmond, VA23228United States

(804) 261-2600

(804) 261-2657

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Maryland

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

map        January 20, 2014        Geologic map of the eastern quarter of the Flagstaff 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, Coconino County, northern Arizona

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2016 - 0183 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 016 - AD Helicopter Model: Kaman Aerospace Corporation Model K- 1200 helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 16 Helicopters in the US Regis try . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent damage to the main rotor flight controls and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 work hours X $85 for revising the flight manual ) $ 43 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $43 Total US Fleet Cost $688 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Y es ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Kirk Gustafson
Exhibit 13.2





Certification
Pursuant to




8
U.S.C.  Section 1350,




as
Adopted Pursuant to




Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam
Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Anita Soni, Director – Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Anita
      SoniName:
                    Anita
      SoniTitle:
                    Director
      (Finance)Date:
                    September
      25, 2009
 The
foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the
aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to
be used or relied upon for any other purposes.
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Dianne H Poteet Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 2,500.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 2,500.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. $ 335.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Representation of Debtor(s) at any adjourned hearings caused by Debtor(s) is excluded from 5c.

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representaton of Debtor(s) in adversary proceedings and other contested bankruptcy matters is excluded in its

entirety.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

December 3, 2021 /s/ Les S. Osborne

Date Les S. Osborne 823139

Signature of Attorney

Rappaport Osborne & Rappaport, PLLC

1300 N Federal Hwy

Suite 203

Boca Raton, FL 33432

561-368-2200 Fax: 561-338-0350

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-21434-SMG Doc 5 Filed 12/03/21 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Uranerz Energy Corporation, (the
Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



Date: March 11, 2009



| | /s/
      Glenn Catchpole         
| | ----------------------------------
| | Glenn Catchpole                   
| | Chief Executive Officer, President
| | and Principal Executive Officer   









The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7142

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM ELDRIDGE ASKEW, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:14-cr-00023-D-2; 5:18-cv-00232-D)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Eldridge Askew, III, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

William Eldridge Askew, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Askew has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion to appoint counsel, deny a 

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7142 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Regional water-level changes for the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer in Iowa, 1975 to 1997      

      January 1, 1999    

View Document

The Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer is one of the principal sources of ground water for industry and municipalities in Iowa. The 1998 Iowa Administrative Code Chapter 52.4(3) states that water levels in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer are not to decline more than 200 feet from the 1977 baseline. The potentiometric-surface map of the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer, known locally as the Jordan aquifer, prepared by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources-Geological Survey Bureau and the U.S. Geological Survey in 1978 using water levels measured during the 1975 water year is considered the 1977 baseline.

For this study, water levels measured during the 1997 water year were used to construct a potentiometric-surface map that was compared to the 1977 baseline to describe water-level changes. Since 1975, water levels have declined in two areas of central and eastern Iowa. The maximum measured water-level decline is 133 feet in Johnson County in eastern Iowa. The estimated maximum rate of decline is 6 feet per year in Johnson County.

Results from a two-layer, ground-water flow model of the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer constructed by the U.S. Geological Survey in 1990 were compared to selected measured 1997 water levels. The difference between the simulated water levels and the 1997 maximum measured water levels ranges from 0 to about 150 feet, but most differences are less than 25 feet. The comparison indicates that the model may help estimate future water levels in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer as an aid in managing the resource.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer
                  - iowa

View All **
Process Overview•Charge Liquid & DryRaw Materials•Stir Premix•Process ConcentrateThrough Sandmill•De-air in Process Tank•QC & Screen Check•Transfer & Screen intoPackaging Tank•Witness Screen toPackaging Line•Finished Goods QAPackageTankMill ScreenBowlScreenProcessTankLiquid & DryRaw MaterialsPremix /ProcessTankPackaging LinePackagingScreenSand MillSecondaryScreenSelf Cleaning ScreenPalletizedQuart andHalfGallonBottlesWitness Filter