CAUFORMA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1

GENERAL INFORMATION

District: South Coast Air Ouality Management District

Rule No: 2202 Date Adopted/Amended/Rescinded: October 9. 1998

Rule Title: On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options

- Date Submitted to ARB: December 15. 1998 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended

(or Adopted): November 8. 1996

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision (X ) Yes ( ) No IfNO, do not complete remainder

ofform.

District Contact: Kathryn Higgins Phone Number: (909) 396-3309

Narrative Summary ofNew Rule or Rule Changes: ( ) New Rule (X) Amended Rule

Rule 2202 — On Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options raises the compliance threshold from 100 employees to 250

employees per worksite effective June 19. 1 998._

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): VOC NOx CO (name): Volatile Organic Compounds. Oxides ofNitrogen,

Carbon Monoxide.

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach

reference(s) for emission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission

information provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease (X ) N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A tons/year

SCC/CES Code Affected: N/A If a SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code

Affected: N/A

(NOTE: Ifmore than one SCC or CES code or more than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are needed, fill out

the following information on a separate form for each combination of codes.)

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A

Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible)
Tons/Year Baseline

Reductions Tons/Year Control Percent Control Control

Year (Increases) Subject to Rule Level Control Level Factnr

/ x 100 = _% 1.00-

/ x 100 = _% 1.00-

/ x 100 = % 1.00-
CAUFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment ( ) Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 1.438

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (~ TPY) Sources Controlled: 122 Percent inNonattainment Area: 100% %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (~ 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary):

Facility Name Fac. ID Location City County Name

See attached list.

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? ( ) Yes ( ) No N/A

IfYes, Those Limits are in Section(s)_______________________ ofthe Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are:

N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A

Attach a Completed EPA SIP Approvability Checklist - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent Compliance/Enforcement

Strategy Statement.

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

(X ) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment

Discussion: The emissions lost as a result of the exempted worksites will be made up from other mobile source programs.

(ARBFORM - 6/93)