### CAUFORMA AIR RESOURCES BOARD APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 1 GENERAL INFORMATION District: South CoastAir Ouality Management District Rule No: 2202 Date Adopted/Amended/Rescinded: October9. 1998 RuleTitle: On-Road MotorVehicle Mitigation Options

- Date Submitted to ARB: December 15. 1998 Ifan Amended Rule, Date LastAmended (orAdopted): November 8. 1996 Isthe Rule Intendedto be Senttothe U.S. EPAas a SIP Revision (X

### ) Yes 

### ( ) No IfNO, do not complete remainder ofform. District Contact: Kathryn Higgins Phone Number: (909) 396-3309 Narrative Summary ofNew Rule or Rule Changes: 

### ( ) New Rule (X) Amended Rule Rule 2202

— On Road MotorVehicle Mitigation Options raises the compliance threshold from 100 employeesto 250 employees perworksite effective June 19. 1998._
Pollutant(s) Regulated bythe Rule (Circle): VOC NOx CO (name): Volatile Organic Compounds. Oxides ofNitrogen, Carbon Monoxide.
II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) foremission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing howthe emission information provided belowwas determined. Net Effect on Emissions: 

### ( ) Increase 

### ( ) Decrease (X

### ) N/A Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP forthis Source Category: N/A tons/year SCC/CES Code Affected: N/A Ifa SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code Affected: N/A (NOTE: Ifmore than one SCC or CES code or more than one combination ofSCC and SIC codes are needed, fill out the following information on a separate form foreach combination ofcodes.) InventoryYear Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A FutureYear Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as manyyears as possible)Tons/Year Baseline

Reductions Tons/Year Control Percent Control Control Year (Increases) Subjectto Rule Level Control Level Factnr



### / x 100 = _% 

### 1.00- / x 100 = _% 

### 1.00- / x 

### 100
= % 

### 1.00-CAUFORNIAAIR RESOURCES BOARD APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 3 III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS District is: 

### ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment 

### ( ) Split Approximate Total Number ofSmall (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 1.438 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100% NumberofLarge 

### (~ TPY) Sources Controlled: 122 Percent inNonattainment Area: 100% % Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) ofLarge 

### (~ 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as necessary): FacilityName Fac. ID Location City County Name See attached list. IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? 

### ( ) Yes 

### ( ) No N/A IfYes, Those Limits are in Section(s)_______________________ ofthe Rule. Other Methods in the Rule forAchieving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS The Rule Contains: Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A Attach a Completed EPA SIP Approvability Checklist

- Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent Compliance/Enforcement Strategy Statement.
VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN (X

### ) No Impact 

### ( ) Impacts RFP 

### ( ) Impacts attainment Discussion: The emissions lost as a result ofthe exempted worksites will be made up from other mobile source programs.
(ARBFORM

- 6/93)