alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr., Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as added byss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934; andTo my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: May 13, 2004 | By:/s/Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.  
|------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                   | Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.,       
|                   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Reno WOLFGANG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5328 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5328

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to require a general notice of 
    proposed rule making for a major rule to include a cost-benefit 
         analysis of the proposed rule, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2016

 Mr. Boustany introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to require a general notice of 
    proposed rule making for a major rule to include a cost-benefit 
         analysis of the proposed rule, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Agency Complete Transparency 
Act of 2016'' or the ``FACT Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED IN GENERAL NOTICE 
              OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING.

    Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) in the case of a major rule (as such term is defined 
        in section 804), a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed rule, 
        including any data or formula used for purposes of such 
        analysis.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 22-11858-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 22-11858-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 22-11858-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 22-11858-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Platina Energy Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Blair Merriam, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
		of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
		respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



	/s/ Blair Merriam
	Blair Merriam
	Chief Executive Officer, President
	and Chief Financial Officer

	February 20, 2007
Exhibit 99.1


                      INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS MARKETING CO.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cosmetics Marketing Co.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Nico P. Pronk, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Nico P. Pronk
------------------
Nico P. Pronk
Director
February 19, 2003
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  March 11, 2008 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 32 (Thursday, February 19, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-30604]



[[Page 7648]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 155

[Docket No. USCG-1998-3417]
RIN 1625-AA19 (Formerly RIN 2115-AF60)


Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements; Vessel Response 
Plans for Oil

Correction

    In rule document E8-30604 beginning on page 80618 in the issue of 
Wednesday, December 31, 2008, make the following correction:


Sec. 155.4030  [Corrected]

    On page 80651, in Sec.  155.4030(b), in TABLE 155.4030(b)--SALVAGE 
AND MARINE FIREFIGHTING SERVICES AND RESPONSE TIMEFRAMES, in entry (2), 
in the fourth column, ``*COM041* CONUS:'' should read ``CONUS:''

[FR Doc. Z8-30604 Filed 2-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2813

___________ Diane M. Cossette, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Minnesota Power & Light, an employer * and business corporation in the State * [UNPUBLISHED] of Minnesota; James R. Burton, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 7, 1998 Filed: May 13, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Diane Cossette appeals from the Distri ct Court’s grant of summary judgment for defen dants on her claims filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 4 2 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (19 94), and dismissal of her state law claims. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Counts 1, 3, and 8 of Cossette’s amended complaint alleged AD A violations, and the remaining counts asserted state law violations. Defendants moved for summary-2-

judgment, and Cossette filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. Following a hearing on the mot

ions, the District Court issued an order and written judgment. Both docu ments provided, "[d]efendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted as to Counts 1 and 3 of [Cossette’s] complaint"; "[Cos sette’s] motion for summary judgment is denied"; and "[t]he Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over th e remainder o f [her] complaint," dismissing it without prejudice. Cossette has appealed from that judgment. As the District Court’s judgment did not dispose of Count 8, one of Cossette’s ADAclaims, the judgment appealed from was not a final judgment. See Otey v
. Marsha ll , 121 F.3d 1150, 1154 (8th Cir. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); cf. 28 U.S.C
. § 1292 (1994). Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)american samoa(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(4)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(39)
              - idaho(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - north carolina(8)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        July 27, 2023        July 2023—Topography and bathymetry of the Manuʻa Islands, American Samoa

Charts or Graphs        September 1, 2022        Topography, bathymetry, and volcano monitoring network of the Manu‘a Islands, American Samoa

Charts or Graphs        September 1, 2022        Topography and bathymetry of the Manu‘a Islands, American Samoa
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Trevor Drinkwater, Chief Executive Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
      Title 18 of the United States Code that:




(1)
      the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period
      ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an
      exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                November 20, 2006
            
            By:
            /s/
                Trevor DrinkwaterTrevor
                Drinkwater
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Stephen Christopher Linthwaite, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Fluidigm Corporation; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 27, 2017By:/s/ Stephen Christopher LinthwaiteStephen Christopher LinthwaitePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Photography        September 19, 2019        Astronauts descending into Meteor Crater in Winslow Arizona.

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!
Elisha THOMAS, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0664

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2018

Elisha Thomas, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Rowe, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Eric L. WILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-690

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 7, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2021362EN.01017501.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/175 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/175

---

P9_TA(2020)0150

Conclusion of the EU-Georgia Common Aviation Area Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 June 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part (09556/2019 — C9-0013/2019 — 2010/0186(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 362/34)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (09556/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (09556/2019),

| — | having regard to the draft Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and Georgia (14370/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and Georgia (14370/2010),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0013/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0013/2019),

| — | having regard to Rules 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0082/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0082/2020),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Georgia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
Luis Juarez ALVARADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Douglas C. Wride, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Websense, Inc., hereby
certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Websense, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the period
covered by the Quarterly Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                    
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ DOUGLAS C. WRIDE                               
|                   |  |     |  | Douglas C. Wride                                   
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by Websense, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Quarterly Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(106 So. 740)

No. 27360.

#### J. M. FOSTER et al. v. E. J. DEAS CO., Inc., et. al.

(Jan. 4, 1926.)

Appeal from .First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; E. P. Mills, Judge.

B. F. Roberts, City Atty., and Lewell C. Butler, both of Shreveport, for appellant E. J. Deas Co.. Inc.

Foster, Hall & Smith, of Shreveport, for appellees.

On Motion to Dismiss.

ROGERS, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of certain property contiguous to Kings Highway, a street or avenue in the city of Shreveport. They brought this suit for damages against said city and the E. J. Deas Company, Inc., in solido, alleging that under a contract ior paving a portion of said avenue the said defendants trespassed upon their property, destroying many valuable trees, and placing thereon a number of large stumps, logs, and other débris, for the removal of which plaintiffs were called upon to expend a large sum of money. The case, which was tried before a jury, resulted in a judgment for $2,500 against the E. J. Deas Company, Inc. Plaintiffs’ demand against the city of Shreveport was dismissed. From the verdict and judgment entered in accordance therewith the E. J. Deas Co., Inc., applied for, and obtained, an order for an appeal. E. J. Deas, individually, became the surety on the appeal bond, and on June 26, 1925, the transcript was filed in the clerk’s office of this court. In proceedings instituted in the court below, judgment was rendered on October 7, 1925, dismissing the appeal because of the pecuniary insufficiency of the surety on the appeal bond. • On November 12, 1925, appellees filed a motion in this court, attaching thereto a certified copy of the judgment, and praying that, after due hearing, | the said appeal be dismissed. This *motion*was fixed for a hearing in *accordance*with the rules of this court, and in due time came on to be heard, and was submitted. Appellant has made no appearance in this court either by way of opposition to the motion of appellees or by filing a brief in its behalf. We take it, therefore, that appellant concedes the correctness of appellees’ contention. The judgment of the court below dismissing the appeal is regular on its face, and it appears to have been rendered contradictorily with the appellant. In these circumstances there is nothing for us to do but to grant the prayer of appellees’ motion.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal herein is dismissed.