alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                         131,808
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,808
<PP&E>                                         9,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,460)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          321,083
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       74
<OTHER-SE>                                     (182,510)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,647
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  614,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (614,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)





</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5321 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5321

 To prevent the proposed amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of 
                 Criminal Procedure from taking effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2016

  Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Farenthold, and Ms. 
   Lofgren) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent the proposed amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of 
                 Criminal Procedure from taking effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Mass Hacking Act''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES.

    The proposed amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
Procedure, which are set forth in the order entered by the Supreme 
Court of the United States on April 28, 2016, shall not take effect.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Trevor
      Drinkwater, Chief Executive Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the “Registrant”),
      do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
      United States Code that:




(1)
      the
      Registrant's Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period
      ended
      March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an exhibit,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                September 26, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Trevor DrinkwaterTrevor
                Drinkwater
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Brian KIRKSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-882

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Legal Realtime Reporting

22

 1 Q. Sure. Did you help develop the plan of

 2 reorganization filed in this case?

 3 A. Yes, I did.

 4 Q. Who is to receive the $10,000 a month management

 5 fee?

 6 A. Well, it would be for expenses incurred by A&S for

 7 loan repayments, and Claudette and myself potentially.

 8 Q. What is a loan repayment? Can you explain that to

 9 me?

10 A. Well, we -- A&S currently has outstanding

11 obligations as far as the loan is concerned. So some of

12 that money would go towards repaying the loan.

13 Q. Okay. What loan are we talking about?

14 A. It's a loan that was taken out to cover a

15 settlement between CRSJ and A&S.

16 Q. Okay. Who provided the loan?

17 A. A private lender.

18 Q. And who is the private lender?

19 MR. MOFFA: I'm going to object to this. As

20 the actual --

21 MR. PERLMAN: John -- John, please don't.

22 MR. MOFFA: I'm objecting. This is -- this is

23 outside the scope of a 2004. I know she said the

24 loan was to --

25 MR. PERLMAN: John, don't testify, please.

Exhibit "B"

Case 21-14020-RAM Doc 214-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 1 of 2
Legal Realtime Reporting

23

 1 MR. MOFFA: But it's --

 2 MR. PERLMAN: John --

 3 MR. MOFFA: I'm going to instruct her not to

 4 answer.

 5 BY MR. PERLMAN:

 6 Q. Who is the private lender to A&S that is being

 7 paid under the plan that has been described?

 8 MR. MOFFA: I'm going to object to the extent

 9 that it is not for A&S. But if she knows about

10 anything that A&S is obligated, then she can answer

11 that part.

12 BY MR. PERLMAN:

13 Q. Can you please explain to me who the private

14 lender is? Let's start with that. Ms. Jones?

15 A. Should I answer?

16 MR. MOFFA: If there was a lender to A&S, yes.

17 If there was a lender to somebody other than A&S,

18 then no.

19 THE WITNESS: Okay. Well --

20 BY MR. PERLMAN:

21 Q. How much was the loan that we're talking about?

22 A. I'm going to not answer on -- I'm not going to

23 answer, because I believe that I'm confusing the loan

24 being for A&S versus it being a personal loan.

25 MR. MOFFA: To that extent then, I object if

Case 21-14020-RAM Doc 214-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 2
Carlos ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
William Crawford MCCULLOUGH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Exhibit 10.45
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
STANDARD MULTI-TENANT OFFICE LEASE  GROSS
 THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO STANDARD MULTI-TENANT OFFICE LEASE  GROSS WESTCORE MESA VIEW, LLC DD MESA VIEW LLC ADVENTRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 R E C I T A L S
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Recitals
 2. Lease of New Premises




---



##### 



3. Description of Premises
 4. Base Rent for New Premises During the New Premises Term
 Monthly BaseMonthly Base
    
    
    Rent for thePeriod
    
    Rent PSF
    
    
    New PremisesMarch 1, 2010  January 31, 2011
    
    $
    1.40
    
    
    $
    7,186.20
  5. Lessees Share of Operating Expense Increase
 6. Early Occupancy
 7. Utilities
 8. Condition of the New Premises
 9. Lessors Right to Enter and Market the Lab Area
 
  2




---



##### 



10. Parking
 11. Estoppel
 12. Brokers
 13. Ratification
 14. Attorneys Fees
 15. Submission
 16. Counterparts
 [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
 
  3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 LessorWESTCORE MESA VIEW, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    
    MRB Manager, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Don Ankeny

Don Ankeny
Authorized SignatoryDD MESA VIEW LLC,
a California limited liability companyBy:
    
    MRB Manager, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Don AnkenyDon Ankeny
Authorized SignatoryLesseeADVENTRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Patrick KeranPatrick Keran
President & Chief Operating Officer
 
  4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 SITE PLAN OF NEW PREMISES
 
 
  5
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5425 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5425

  To require the President to designate a legal public holiday to be 
                known as National First Responders Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2016

Mr. Capuano (for himself, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Israel, Mr. King of New York, 
   Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Fattah, Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Brady of 
 Pennsylvania, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Perlmutter, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of 
 New York, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hastings, Mr. 
 McGovern, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. 
Meng, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Carson of Indiana, Mr. Keating, Ms. Tsongas, Ms. Wilson of Florida, and 
Mr. Pascrell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the President to designate a legal public holiday to be 
                known as National First Responders Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL FIRST RESPONDERS DAY.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the President shall issue a proclamation that designates a date as a 
legal public holiday to be known as ``National First Responders Day'', 
which shall be treated in the same manner as a legal public holiday 
described in section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2024

NO. 03-22-00042-CV

City of Austin, Texas, Appellant

v.

1811 Guadalupe LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 455TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on January 7, 2022. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s interlocutory order. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and in the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Rivoli Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Patrick McGoldrick, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Geraldine Bolen, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of our knowledge and belief that:

  (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



/s/ J. Patrick McGoldrick
-------------------------------------
J. Patrick McGoldrick
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004


/s/ Geraldine Bolen
-------------------------------------
Geraldine Bolen
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2004

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2020216EN.01000501.xml

| 30.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 18 September 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39824 – Trucks

Rapporteur: Ireland

(2020/C 216/04)

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the anticompetitive behaviour covered by the draft decision constitutes agreements and/or concerted practices between relevant undertakings within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 EEA.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment of the product and geographic scope of the agreements and/or concerted practices contained in the draft decision.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the undertaking concerned by the draft decision has, together with the addressees of the Commission’s settlement decision of 19 July 2016 in Case AT.39824, participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 EEA.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the object of the agreements and/or concerted practices for the infringement described in the draft decision was to restrict competition within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU and Article 53 EEA.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreements and/or concerted practices described in the draft decision have been capable of appreciably affecting trade between the Member States of the EU.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment as regards the duration for the infringement described in the draft decision.

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission as regards the addressees of the draft decision.

8.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17276-17281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z9-8232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

[Docket No. USTR-2009-0011]


Initiation of Section 302 Investigation, Determination of Action 
Under Section 301, and Request for Comments: Canada-Compliance With 
Softwood Lumber Agreement

Correction

    In notice document E9-8232 beginning on page 16436 in the issue of 
Friday, April 10, 2009 make the following correction:
    On page 16438, in the second column, immediately following the 
signature block, five photographed pages were inadvertently deleted. 
They are reprinted in full below:
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

[[Page 17277]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AP09.190


[[Page 17278]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AP09.191


[[Page 17279]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AP09.192


[[Page 17280]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AP09.193


[[Page 17281]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN10AP09.194


[FR Doc. Z9-8232 Filed X-XX-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-C
Harvey DEMAREST, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Gary CONEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2282

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*325Affirmed. *See* *Rodriguez v. State*, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992) (noting: "It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal"); *Steinhorst v. State*, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla. 1982) (holding: "In order for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below"); *Black v. State*, 367 So.2d 656, 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (same). *See also* *Overton v. State*, 801 So.2d 877, 900-01) (Fla. 2001) (discussing evidentiary principle of "opening the door", premised on notions of fairness and truth-seeking function of a trial).
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 64976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22776]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[AC 187-1K]

Schedule of Charges Outside the United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is announcing the 
availability of Advisory Circular (AC) 187-1K which transmits an 
updated schedule of charges for services of FAA Flight Standards 
Aviation Safety Inspectors outside the United States. The advisory 
circular has been updated in accordance with the procedures listed in 
14 CFR part 187, Appendix A.

DATES: This AC is effective on October 1, 2016.

ADDRESSES: How to obtain copies: A copy of this publication may be 
downloaded from: http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tish Thompkins, Flight Standards 
Service, AFS-50, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-0996.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 8, 2016.
John Barbagallo,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-22776 Filed 9-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  I, Christopher Paton-Gay , president/director, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of September 30, 2003;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated: November , 2003    /s/ Christopher Paton-Gay
 Christopher Paton-Gay
 president director
Betty ELIEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GLOBE LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.