95176 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 

60871 (July 29, 2024) (Initiation Notice). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection Data,’’ dated August 5, 2024. 

6See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Comments on U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection Data,’’ dated August 

12, 2024. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review,’’ dated August 20, 2024. 

8See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petitioner’s Comments 

on Notice of Intent to Rescind Review,’’ dated 

August 27, 2024. 

9See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the 

Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758 

(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut- to Length Plate from the Federal Republic 

of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4157 

(January 24, 2023), and Lightweight Thermal Paper 

From Japan: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 18373 

(March 13, 2024). 

10See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

11See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. 

United States, 380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335–36 (CIT 

2019), at 12 (referring to section 751(a) of the Act, 

the CIT held: ‘‘While the statute does not explicitly 

require that an entry be suspended as a prerequisite 

for establishing entitlement to a review, it does 

explicitly state the determined rate will be used as 

the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This 

result can only obtain if the liquidation of entries 

has been suspended. . . . ’’; see also Certain 

Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final Determination of 

No Shipments; 2018–2019, 86 FR 36102, and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium 

Nitrate From the Russian Federation: Notice of 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that 

‘‘for an administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be 

liquidated at the newly calculated assessment 

rate’’). 

1See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 65925 (November 

6, 2014) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 75270 (November 2, 

2023). 

ceramic tile manufactured or exported 

by Cayenne and Foshan Qiangshengda, 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).4 On August 

5, 2024, we placed on the record U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

data for entries of ceramic tile from 

China during the POR, showing no 

reviewable POR entries, and invited 

interested parties to comment.5 On 

August 12, 2024, the Coalition for Fair 

Trade in Ceramic Tile (petitioner) 

submitted comments to Commerce 

regarding the CBP data, requesting that 

Commerce rescind the administrative 

review.6

Additionally, on August 20, 2024, 

Commerce notified all interested parties 

of its intent to rescind this 

administrative review in full because 

there were no reviewable, suspended 

entries of subject merchandise by the 

company listed in the Initiation Notice 

during the POR and invited interested 

parties to comment.7 On August 27, 

2024, the petitioner submitted 

comments to Commerce regarding the 

intent to rescind the instant review, 

again requesting that Commerce rescind 

the review.8

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is 

Commerce’s practice to rescind an 

administrative review of an AD order 

when there are no reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which liquidation is suspended.9

Normally, upon completion of an 

administrative review, the suspended 

entries are liquidated at the AD 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.10 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct CBP 

to liquidate at the AD assessment rate 

calculated for the review period.11 As 

noted above, there were no entries of 

subject merchandise for the companies 

listed in the Initiation Notice during the 

POR. Accordingly, in the absence of 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR, we are 

hereby rescinding this administrative 

review, in its entirety, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Antidumping duties shall be 

assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of this rescission notice in 

the Federal Register. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: November 25, 2024. 

Scot Fullerton, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28156 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–844] 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From 

Mexico: Preliminary Results and 

Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022– 

2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. 

(Deacero) and I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. 

Estructurales, S.A. de C.V. (Ingetek) 

(collectively, Deacero Group); and TA 

2000 S.A. de C.V. (TA 2000) sold steel 

concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from 

Mexico at less than normal value during 

the period of review (POR), November 1, 

2022, through October 31, 2023. 

Additionally, Commerce is rescinding 

this administrative review with respect 

to certain companies. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle 

Clahane or T.J. Worthington, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5449 or (202) 482–4567, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 6, 2014, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on rebar 

from Mexico.1 On November 2, 2023, 

we published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the Order.2 On 

December 29, 2023, pursuant to section 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 95177 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

90168 (December 29, 2023) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated July 29, 2024. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the of the Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order: Steel 

Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico; 2022–2023,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

7See Initiation Notice, 88 FR at 90170- 90171. 

Commerce previously found Deacero and Ingetek to 

be affiliated, and we continue to treat them as a 

single entity. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar 

from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 37849 

(June 9, 2023) (Rebar from Mexico AR 2020–2021 

Final), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM) at Comment 3. Therefore, they 

were listed together in the Initiation Notice. 

Separately, Commerce has previously collapsed 

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.; Aceros Especiales 

Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero 

Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant, S.A.P.I. de 

C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; 

Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. 

de C.V.; Siderurgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.; Simec 

International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7, 

S.A. de C.V.; and Simec International, S.A. de C.V. 

into the single entity ‘‘Grupo Simec.’’ Therefore, 

they were listed together in the Initiation Notice. 

See Rebar from Mexico AR 2020–2021 Final IDM at 

Comment 3; see also Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar 

from Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 

63622 (December 11, 2018), and accompanying 

memorandum, ‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing 

Memorandum for the Grupo Simec,’’ dated 

December 3, 2018, unchanged in Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017, 84 FR 35599 (July 24, 2019). 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated March 1, 2024. As discussed below in the 

‘‘Preliminary Successor-in-Interest Determination’’ 

section below, Commerce has preliminarily 

determined that TA 2000 is the successor-ininterest to Talleres y Aceros S.A. de C.V. (TYASA). 

9See Gerdau Corsa’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated January 

25, 2024. 

10See Appendix II. 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated March 26, 2024 (Intent to 

Rescind Memorandum). 

12See Appendix II. As explained above, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce 

is also rescinding this review, in part, with respect 

to Gerdau Corsa based on receiving a timely 

withdrawal request. 

13See Initiation Notice, 88 FR at 90171. 14See Preliminary Decision Memorandum (citing 

TA 2000’s Letter, ‘‘Section A Response,’’ dated 

April 25, 2024, at 1). 15See Preliminary Decision Memorandum (citing 

Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Supplemental Questionnaire 

for TA 2000,’’ dated August 21, 2024, and TA 

2000’s Letter, ‘‘Supplemental Response,’’ dated 

September 23, 2024). 

751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), Commerce initiated 

an administrative review of the Order 

covering eleven companies.3 On July 22, 

2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.4 On July 29, 

2024, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the preliminary results until 

November 22, 2024.5

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.6 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this Order is 

rebar from Mexico. For a full 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rescission of Review, In Part 

As noted above, we initiated this 

review with respect to 11 companies.7

During the course of the review, we 

selected two mandatory respondents, 

which included three of the named 

companies.8 As a consequence, there are 

eight companies upon which a review 

was requested and which were not 

selected for individual examination. 

Commerce received a timely 

withdrawal request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the Initiation 

Notice with respect to Gerdau Corsa 

S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Gerdau Corsa).9 No 

other party requested a review of this 

company. As a result, Commerce is 

rescinding this review, in part, with 

respect to Gerdau Corsa in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).10

In addition, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), Commerce will rescind 

an administrative review when there are 

no reviewable suspended entries. Based 

on our analysis of U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) information, 

eight companies listed in the Initiation 

Notice had no entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR, including 

one of which had all its requests for 

review timely withdrawn (i.e., Gerdau 

Corsa) and seven that remain subject to 

a review request. On March 26, 2024, 

we notified parties of our intent to 

rescind this administrative review with 

respect to the companies that had no 

reviewable suspended entries during the 

POR.11 No party to the proceeding 

provided comments on our Intent to 

Rescind Memorandum. As a result, we 

are rescinding this review, in part, with 

respect to the remaining seven 

companies which had no entries in the 

POR.12 Accordingly, the companies that 

remain subject to the instant review are 

Deacero Group and TA 2000. 

Preliminary Successor-in-Interest 

Determination 

Commerce initiated this 

administrative review with respect to 

eleven companies, including TA 2000 

and TYASA.13 TA 2000 reported that 

the company was formerly named 

TYASA, and continues to market and 

sell merchandise under the TYASA 

brand name.14 We requested additional 

information, which TA 2000 submitted 

in response to a supplemental 

questionnaire.15 We have analyzed 

record information regarding changes in 

TYASA’s management, manufacturing 

facilities, customers, and suppliers, and 

preliminarily determine that TA 2000 is 

the successor-in-interest to TYASA. 

Accordingly, we have treated TYASA 

and TA 2000 as the same company in 

our analysis in this review. See the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum for 

further information. Should our 

preliminary successor-in-interest 

determination remain unchanged in the 

final results of review, we will instruct 

CBP to apply the assessment rates that 

we calculated for TA 2000 to POR 

entries of subject merchandise from 

both TA 2000 and TYASA. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. Export price was calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. Normal value was calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period November 

1, 2022, through October 31, 2023: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./ 

I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales 

S.A ..................................................... 8.88 

TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. 16 ........................ 22.27 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
95178 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 

16As discussed in further detail in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we 

preliminarily determine that TA 2000 is the 

successor-in-interest to Talleres y Aceros S.A. de 

C.V. 

17See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Service Procedures). 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

21We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

22See APO and Service Procedures. 

23See 19 CFR 351.310. 

24See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

25 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).17

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.18

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed no later 

than five days after the date for filing 

case briefs.19 Interested parties who 

submit case or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue; and, (2) a 

table of authorities.20

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their briefs that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.21 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

public executive summary of each issue 

to no more than 450 words, not 

including citations. We intend to use 

the public executive summaries as the 

basis of the comment summaries 

included in the issues and decision 

memorandum that will accompany the 

final results in this administrative 

review. We request that interested 

parties include footnotes for relevant 

citations in the public executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).22

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, using Enforcement and 

Compliance’s ACCESS system within 30 

days of publication of this notice. 

Requests should contain (1) the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants and 

whether any participant is a foreign 

national; and (3) a list of the issues to 

be discussed. Issues raised in the 

hearing will be limited to those raised 

in the case and rebuttal briefs. If a 

request for a hearing is made, we will 

inform parties of the scheduled date and 

location for the hearing at a time to be 

determined.23 Parties should confirm by 

telephone the date, time, and location of 

the hearing no fewer than two days 

before the scheduled date. Parties are 

reminded that all briefs and hearing 

requests must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS and received 

successfully in their entirety by 5:00 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), 

Commerce will issue the final results of 

this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of the issues 

raised by the parties in their case briefs, 

not later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review and 

for future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable.24 Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 41 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). 

If the respective weighted-average 

dumping margins are above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of 

this review, we will calculate importerspecific ad valorem AD assessment rates 

based on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for the importer’s 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those same sales in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).25 If the 

respondent has not reported entered 

values, we will calculate a per-unit 

assessment rate for each importer by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales made 

to that importer by the total quantity 

associated with those sales. We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific assessment rate calculated in 

the final results of this review is above 

de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by the respondents 

for which they did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries not reviewed at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

For the companies for which the 

administrative review is rescinded, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of the final 

results of the administrative review for 

all shipments of rebar from Mexico 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: 

(1) the cash deposit rate for each 

company listed above will be equal to 

the dumping margins established in the 

final results of this review, except if the 

ultimate rate is de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rates will 

be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this administrative review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the producer or 

exporter participated; (3) if the exporter 

is not a firm covered in this review, a 

prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 95179 

26See Order, 79 FR at 65926. 

1See Certain Steel Trailer Wheels 12 to 16.5 

Inches from the People’s Republic of China: 

Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 

84 FR 45952 (September 3, 2019) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 89 

FR 62717 (August 1, 2024). 

3See Dexstar’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to 

Participate in the First Five-Year Review,’’ dated 

August 16, 2024. 

4 Id. 

5See Dexstar’s Letter, ‘‘Petitioner’s Substantive 

Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated August 

30, 2024. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on August 1, 2024,’’ dated September 24, 

2024. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in 

Diameter from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

established for the most recently 

completed segment of the proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 20.58 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the AD investigation.26

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: November 22, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rescission of Review, In Part 

V. Preliminary Successor-in-Interest 

Determination 

VI. Affiliation and Single Entity Treatment 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Currency Conversion 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Rescinded From Administrative 

Review 

1. Compania Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de 

C.V. 

2. Gerdau Corsa, S.A.P.I. de C.V. 

3. Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V. 

4. Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.; Aceros 

Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; 

Fundiciones de Acero Estructurales, S.A. 

de C.V.; Grupo Chant, S.A.P.I. de C.V.; 

Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; 

Orge S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales 

Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgicos Noroeste, 

S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 6 S.A. de 

C.V.; Simec International 7, S.A. de C.V.; 

Simec International, S.A. de C.V. 

5. RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V. 

6. Sidertul S.A. de C.V. 

7. Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. 

de C.V. 

8. Simec International 9 S.A. de C.V. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28154 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–090] 

Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches 

in Diameter From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

Expedited First Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on certain steel wheels 12 to 

16.5 inches in diameter (steel wheels) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate 

Fracke, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3299. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 3, 2019, Commerce 

published the AD order on steel wheels 

from China.1 On August 1, 2024, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the first sunset review of 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2

On August 16, 2024, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in this review from the Dexstar Wheel 

Division of Americana Development 

(Dexstar) within the deadline specified 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Dexstar 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(17) as a producer of a 

domestic like product in the United 

States.4 On August 30, 2024, Commerce 

received an adequate substantive 

response from Dexstar.5 We received no 

substantive responses from any other 

interested parties, nor was a hearing 

requested. 

On September 24, 2024, Commerce 

notified the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (ITC) that it did not receive 

an adequate substantive response from 

respondent interested parties.6 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the Order covers certain 

steel trailer wheels with a nominal 

wheel diameter of 12 to 16.5 inches, 

regardless of width. For a full 

description of the scope, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review is contained 

in the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.8 A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would be likely to lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and that the magnitude of the dumping 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1