alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - (-)illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        November 1, 2023        National- to continental-scale governmental geophysical efforts for critical mineral mapping, USA
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - (-)2022(4)
              - 2021(3)

science explorer topicGreenhouse Gases and Carbon Storage

Science Theme        June 16, 2022      Species Stressors - Evaluation and Mitigation

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Cycling of Carbon and Nutrients

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      Methods
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Transportation Security Administration

          - 49 CFR Part 1572
          - [Docket No. TSA-2006-24191; TSA Amendment Nos. 1515-(New), 1540-8, 1570-2, and 1572-7]
          - RIN 1652-AA41

      ( print page 15195)    

### Correction

In rule document E7-5487 beginning on page 14049 in the issue of Monday, March 26, 2007, make the following correction:

§ 1572.103

On page 14050, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in the third line, “(b)(2)(xii)” should read “(b)(2)(xiii)”.

[FR Doc. Z7-5487 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(39)
              - multimedia_image-141771(36)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(9)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - american samoa(3)
              - california(2)
              - (-)hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - puerto rico(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        November 10, 2022        Bathymetric data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) collected around American Samoa

Charts or Graphs        March 25, 2016        June 27th lava flow and steepest descent paths near Pāhoa, Kīlauea
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [NRC-2009-0164]

### Correction

FR Notice Document E9-8602 was published on page 17696 in the issue of Thursday, April 16, 2009. This document was an inadvertent republication of FR Doc. E9-8599, which published on page 15746 in the issue of Wednesday, April 15, 2009. Therefore, FR Doc. E9-8602 is withdrawn.

[FR Doc. Z9-8599 Filed 4-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Termination Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.86 
 Termination Agreement 
 This Agreement is executed on January 16, 2006 by and between: 
 Party A: Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”) 
 Registered Address: Room 601, Unit C, No.18 of Xi Huan Road (S), Economic-Technological Development Area, Beijing 
 Party B:
Wang Lei Lei (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”) 
 Address: No.1001, Building 1, Xiaoyangyibin Bystreet, Dongcheng District, Beijing 

Whereas: 
  

	1.	Party A and Party B executed a Share Pledge Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Share Pledge Agreement”) with respect to the equity interest held by Party B in
Beijing Lei Ting Wan Jun Network Technology Company Limited on November 30, 2004. 

  

	2.	Party A and Party B wish to terminate the said Share Pledge Agreement. 

 Now therefore, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Share Pledge Agreement, which shall automatically become invalid upon the effective date of this agreement. 

  

	2.	On the date when the Share Pledge Agreement becomes invalid, the rights and obligations of Party A and Party B under the Share Pledge Agreement shall be terminated accordingly.


  

	3.	This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution. 

  

	4.	This Agreement shall be governed by the PRC laws. 

  

	5.	This Agreement is made in two copies, each held by either Party. 

  

 1 









			
	[Execution Page]
	
	 Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd.

	
	  

	Name:	 	Wang Lei Lei
	Title:	 	Legal Representative
	
	Wang Lei Lei
		
	Signature:	 	

  

 2
Trampis DOWDLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas J. GAULIN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. BEE THOW SAYKAO, Appellant. No. 72156-9-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: December 28, 2015 CD m
CO

en cr.

PER CURIAM. Bee Saykao appeals from thejudgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty to second degree assault. Saykao's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 

### (1970), and Anders v. California. 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), the motion to withdraw must: [1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything inthe record that 

### mightarguably supportthe appeal. [2] A copy ofcounsel's brief should be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points 

### that he chooses; [4]the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full examination of allthe proceedings, to decide whetherthe case is wholly frivolous. 

### State v. Theobald. 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders v. California. 386 U.S. at 744). 

### This procedure has been followed. Saykao's counsel on appeal filed a brief withthe motion to withdraw. Saykao was served with a copy ofthe briefand 

### informed of the right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. He filed a statement of additional grounds. 

### The facts are accurately set forth incounsel's brief insupport ofthe motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has independentlyNo. 72156-9-1/2 

### reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential issues raised by counsel: 

### 1. Did the sentencing court err by refusing to reduce Saykao's community custody term by the amount of time he served in total confinementin excess of his amended sentence? 

### 2. Did the sentencing court err by refusing to prohibitthe Department of 

### Correctionsfrom requiring random drug testing during community custody? 

### Saykao also raised, and the courtconsidered, thefollowing potential issue: Did the sentencing court err byfailing to order Saykao's immediate release from custody? 

### Thepotential issues arewholly frivolous. Counsel's motion towithdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

For the court: 

# T/» <y~ey io
LaShaw ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0656

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cascading Hazards

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(11)
              - science_science(46)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(127)
              - multimedia_image-141771(119)
              - multimedia_image-141773(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(6)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(112)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(29)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(31)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(32)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Cascades Volcanoes Simplified Hazards Maps
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5





June 28, 2017


Delek Group, Ltd.
19, Abba Eban Blvd. P.O.B. 2054
Herzliya 4612001, Israel
Attn:  Leora Pratt Levin
Vice President & General Counsel


Re:  Prepayment of Term Promissory Note


Dear Ms. Levin:


Reference is made to that certain $104,685,468.75 Term Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated April 18, 2016 of AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Delek Finance US Inc., a Delaware corporation, which transferred the Note to Delek Group, Ltd. (the “Holder”) in accordance with the terms of the Note.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Note.  


As of the date hereof, the outstanding principal balance of the Note is $78,514,101.57.  The next Payment Date under the Note is April 18, 2018, at which time a principal installment of $26,171,367.18 (the “April 2018 Principal Installment”) will be due and payable.


In lieu of making the April 2018 Principal Installment on or before April 18, 2018, the Company instead proposes to prepay the April 2018 Principal Installment on or before June 30, 2017 by payment of an amount (the “Prepayment”) equal to the sum of (a) 99% of the April 2018 Principal Installment, which shall be an amount equal to $25,909,653.51, and (b) the accrued and unpaid interest under the Note as of such Prepayment date.  The Holder hereby agrees to accept the Prepayment in lieu of the April 2018 Principal Installment and agrees that after giving effect to the Prepayment, the outstanding principal balance of the Note will be $52,342,734.39.  


If the Company makes the Prepayment on or before June 30, 2017, the next Payment Date at which principal under the Note shall be due and payable is April 18, 2019.  


This letter agreement is subject to Section 8(f) (Governing Law; Submission to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial) and Section 8(j) (Counterparts; Integration; Effectiveness) of the Note, which Sections are incorporated herein by reference.










Please indicate your consent and agreement to the foregoing by countersigning a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.


Regards,


AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.






By      /s/ Harry Schlachter            
Name: Harry Schlachter
Title: SVP, Assistant Treasurer


Consented and agreed to as the date first above written.


DELEK GROUP LTD.






By       /s/ Asaf Bartfeld            
Name: Asaf Bartfeld
Title: Chief Executive Officer


By      /s/ Ido Adar                
Name: Ido Adar
Title: Treasurer




[Signature Page to Letter Agreement re Note Prepayment]
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICEWEB, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.        The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  February 14, 2008  By:/s/ Mark B. Lucky Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 57 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-61592) and Amendment No. 468 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 7, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP







Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 4, 2017
STATE of Louisiana v. Donald DICKERSON

No. 2017-KO-1147

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons *1063I agree with the court's decision to decline supervisory jurisdiction. However, I write separately to emphasize that defendant was found guilty of second degree battery based on evidence establishing that he engaged in a violent and unprovoked attack that resulted in serious and substantial injuries to the victim. *See**State v. Dickerson,* 16-1336, pp. 2-3 (La. App. 1 Cir. 4/12/17), 218 So.3d 633, 637 (testimonial evidence established that defendant hit the victim multiple times, resulting in an orbital blowout fracture, a hematoma behind his injured eyeball, a nasal bone fracture, and ten stitches required in his face). The State appropriately filed a habitual offender bill, deeming defendant an adjudicated fourth-felony offender based on predicate felonies that are all crimes of violence (purse snatching, armed robbery, and simple robbery).1 Although the defendant claims a life sentence is unconstitutionally excessive because the present victim did not die from the injuries he inflicted, I believe the sentence imposed by the trial court is warranted by defendant's repeated recourse to violence, and that the State wisely exercised the discretion to pursue recidivist sentence enhancement to promote public safety.

1

In contrast, this Court has found error when the State has improperly utilized La. R.S. 529.1 to punish non-violent offenders. *See**State v. Mosby,* 14-2704 (La. 11/20/15), 180 So.3d 1274 (wherein the Court vacated the thirty-year sentence of a non-violent 72 year-old as unconstitutionally excessive); *State v. Guidry* , 16-1412 (La. 3/15/17), 221 So.3d 815 (...."[T]he abusive frequency with which a *de minimis* number of jurisdictions invoke habitual offender laws against non-violent actors appears to do little to protect the people of Louisiana, and depletes the already scarce fiscal resources of this state." Crichton, J., additionally concurring); and *State v. Ladd* , 14-1611 (La. 3/27/15), 164 So.3d 184 (Knoll, J., and Crichton, J., both concurring in the Court's reversal of sentence of non-violent defendant, where trial court supplied no reasons, as non-compliant with La. R.S. 15:529.1 )
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Innovative Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Carol Dore-Falcone , Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|     | (3)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   |                                                                                                                                           |
|               | (4)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|                          |                          | /s/ Carol Dore-Falcone                                                          |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                          |                                                                                 |
|      |      | Carol Dore-Falcone Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2002 |
EXHIBIT 10.2


                  REORGANIZATION AMENDMENT
                           TO THE
  MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE UNIT PLAN OF INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY


     WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand Company, a New Jersey
corporation, adopted the Management Incentive Unit Plan of
Ingersoll-Rand Company (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended from time to time;
and

     WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand Company reserved the right at
any time and from time to time to amend the Plan in
accordance with Section XV(b) of the Plan; and

     WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand Company, acting on authority of
its Board of Directors and shareholders desires to amend the
Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended in the
following respects effective as of the date hereof or such
other dates as defined below:

     1.   The definition of Common Stock in Section II(c) of
the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
of the Effective Time to read as follows:

          "(c)  `Common Stock' means the Class A common
shares, par value $1.00 per share, of Ingersoll-Rand Company
Limited, a Bermuda company."

     2.   Section II of the Plan is hereby amended to
include the following definitions in proper alphabetical
progression:

          "(g-1)  `Effective Time' means the Effective Time
as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement."

          "(h-1)  `Merger Agreement' means that certain
Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, Ingersoll-
Rand Company Limited and IR Merger Corporation, dated as of
October 31, 2001, pursuant to which the Company will become
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Ingersoll-Rand
Company Limited."
     3.   Except as specifically set forth herein, all other
terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and
are hereby ratified in all respects.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ingersoll-Rand Company has had its
duly authorized representative sign this Amendment on
December 31, 2001.

                         INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY


                         By:  /S/
                              Ronald G. Heller
                              Vice President and Secretary
Justin W. BRYANT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Timothy THROCKMORTON, DOC #H10877, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.