alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Consolidated  Travel  Systems,
Inc.(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, J. Rockwell Smith,  Principal  Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ J. Rockwell Smith
--------------------------------
J. Rockwell Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
April 8, 2004

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(4)
              - california(2)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Collection

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cores

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Survey of TES high albedo events in Mars' northern polar craters      

      January 1, 2007    

Following the work exploring Korolev Crater (Armstrong et al., 2005) for evidence of crater interior ice deposits, we have conducted a survey of Thermal Emission Spectroscopy (TES) temperature and albedo measurements for Mars' northern polar craters larger than 10 km. Specifically, we identify a class of craters that exhibits brightening in their interiors during a solar longitude, Ls, of 60 to 120 degrees, roughly depending on latitude. These craters vary in size, latitude, and morphology, but appear to have a specific regional association on the surface that correlates with the distribution of subsurface hydrogen (interpreted as water ice) previously observed on Mars. We suggest that these craters, like Korolev, exhibit seasonal high albedo frost events that indicate subsurface water ice within the craters. A detailed study of these craters may provide insight in the geographical distribution of the ice and context for future polar missions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: CARLOS PRADA CASE NUMBER: 21-14911-LMI

 ANAYS MESTRE

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for December 1, 2021 hearing. All amendments and documents for the December 1, 

2021 hearing were due as of November 9, 2021. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior 

to "re-sending" documents)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 1/4:

Due on or before 5pm on 12/16: obj/conf to CL#10.2 IRS (under paid)

Case 21-14911-LMI Doc 68 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-1804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 97

[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0390; FRL-8519-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Ohio; Clean Air Interstate Rule

Correction

    In rule document E8-1804 beginning on page 6034 in the issue of 
Friday, February 1, 2008, make the following corrections:

Appendix A to Subpart IIII of Part 97 [Corrected]

    1. On page 6041, in the first column, in amendatory instruction 8, 
in the first line, ``Appendix A to Subpart IV'' should read ``Appendix 
A to Subpart IIII''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in the last appendix 
heading, in the first line, ``Appendix A to Subpart IV of Part 97'' 
should read ``Appendix A to Subpart IIII of Part 97''.

[FR Doc. Z8-1804 Filed 2-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 1 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 2 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 3 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 4 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 5 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 6 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 7 of 8
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 29 Filed 03/31/21 Page 8 of 8
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Unprocessed atmospheric nitrate in waters of the Northern Forest Region in the USA and Canada      

      March 4, 2019    

Little is known about the regional extent and variability of nitrate from atmospheric deposition that is transported to streams without biological processing in forests. We measured water chemistry and isotopic tracers (δ18O and δ15N) of nitrate sources across the Northern Forest Region of the U.S. and Canada and reanalyzed data from other studies to determine when, where, and how unprocessed atmospheric nitrate was transported in catchments. These inputs were more widespread and numerous than commonly recognized, but with high spatial and temporal variability. Only 6 of 32 streams had high fractions (>20%) of unprocessed atmospheric nitrate during baseflow. Seventeen had high fractions during stormflow or snowmelt, which corresponded to large fractions in near-surface soil waters or groundwaters, but not deep groundwater. The remaining 10 streams occasionally had some (<20%) unprocessed atmospheric nitrate during stormflow or baseflow. Large, sporadic events may continue to be cryptic due to atmospheric deposition variation among storms and a near complete lack of monitoring for these events. A general lack of observance may bias perceptions of occurrence; sustained monitoring of chronic nitrogen pollution effects on forests with nitrate source apportionments may offer insights needed to advance the science as well as assess regulatory and management schemes.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Gregory B Lawrence (Former Employee)          

##### Physical Scientist (RGE)

New York Water Science Center

####             Douglas A Burns (Former Employee)          

##### Coordinator, Delaware River Basin Next Generation Water Observing System (NGWOS)

New York Water Science Center

## Related Content

####             Gregory B Lawrence (Former Employee)          

##### Physical Scientist (RGE)

New York Water Science Center

####             Douglas A Burns (Former Employee)          

##### Coordinator, Delaware River Basin Next Generation Water Observing System (NGWOS)

New York Water Science Center

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
Communication Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                 /s/ Michael J. Zwebner
Dated: August 19, 2005               -------------------------------------------
                                 Michael J. Zwebner
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Elias Antoun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Genesis Microchip Inc. on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Genesis Microchip Inc.        Date: June 12, 2007 By:  /s/ Elias Antoun    **Elias Antoun**         **Chief Executive Officer**   I, Linda Millage, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Genesis Microchip Inc. on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Genesis Microchip Inc.        Date: June 12, 2007 By:  /s/Linda Millage    **Linda Millage**         **Principal Accounting Officer**
Eduardo RAVELO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1557

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5275 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5275

 To protect the authority of States and local governments to enact and 
enforce policies regarding the use of sex-segregated bathrooms and sex-
  segregated locker rooms of educational institutions on the basis of 
                            gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2016

Mr. Messer (for himself, Mr. Rokita, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Meadows, Mr. 
Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Massie, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. 
  Rouzer, Mr. Jordan, and Mr. Walker) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To protect the authority of States and local governments to enact and 
enforce policies regarding the use of sex-segregated bathrooms and sex-
  segregated locker rooms of educational institutions on the basis of 
                            gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting the Usurpation of 
Bathroom Laws through Independent Choice School Act (PUBLIC School Act) 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITY REGARDING SEX-SEGREGATED BATHROOMS 
              AND SEX-SEGREGATED LOCKER ROOMS OF EDUCATIONAL 
              INSTITUTIONS.

    It shall not be unlawful under any Federal law (including title IX 
of the Education Amendments of 1972) for a State, or local government 
of a State, to enact or enforce a policy regarding the use of sex-
segregated bathrooms, or sex-segregated locker rooms, of educational 
institutions on the basis of gender identity. Federal financial 
assistance may not be reduced or denied on the basis that a State, or 
local government of a State, enacts or enforces a policy regarding the 
use of sex-segregated bathrooms, or sex-segregated locker rooms, of an 
educational institution on the basis of gender identity.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``gender identity'' shall have 
the meaning given it in section 249 of title 18 of the United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHEL TORRES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2234

[March 24, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard Bober, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 14-009347 CF10A.

Michel Torres, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Allen TARVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Alexander A. HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - (-)puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Project        June 25, 2021        Coral Reef Project: Puerto Rico
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                      5

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         77,455
<SECURITIES>                                                  705,697
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 282,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (140,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              994,173
<PP&E>                                                        485,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (88,992)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              6,127,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,877,239
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       25,736
<OTHER-SE>                                                  3,737,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                6,127,402
<SALES>                                                     1,290,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            1,290,774
<CGS>                                                         639,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               2,090,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               42,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            252,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,339,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,339,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,339,423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.05


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Competitive Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerald Woods, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Jerald Woods |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Jerald Woods, Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|

|   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|--------|------------------------------|

|   | March 31, 2008 |
|--------|----------------|