alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOSS
HOLDINGS, INC. AND CONTAINS UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              27
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      169
<ALLOWANCES>                                        37
<INVENTORY>                                        163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   336
<PP&E>                                             248
<DEPRECIATION>                                      94
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              522
<BONDS>                                            302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          77
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       769
<SALES>                                            272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   272
<CGS>                                              226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (9)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (9)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Ronald A. Waldorf, Chief Executive Officer of AcuNetx, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
September 30, 2007.

DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 2007

                                                     /s/ RONALD A. WALDORF
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     RONALD A. WALDORF
                                                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Miranda GEFFON, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SOCKOL AND ASSOCIATES, P.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4133

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
(107 So. 704)

No. 27579.

#### TYLER v. HARMON.

(March 5, 1926.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Constitutional law <&wkey;215, 274.

Ordinance of New Orleans, providing for segregation of residences of white and colored persons, *held*not violative of Const. U. S. Amend. 14.

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Hugh C. Cage, Judge.

Suit by Joseph W. Tyler against Benjamin Harmon. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Loys Charbonnet and P. P. Teissier, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

W. W. Wright, of New Orleans, for appellee.

ST. PAUL, J.

This ease has been here on appeal once before as No. 26948. of our docket. See Tyler v. Harmon, 104 So. 200, 158 La. 439.

I.

On that appeal we had before us a judgment of the district court discharging a rule nisi (to show cause why plaintiff should not be granted a temporary injunction as prayed for), and *dismissing*plaintiff’s suit on the ground that defendant’s exception or plea of “no ?ight or cause of action” was well founded as to the ground therein *thirdly*set up, to wit, that Ordinance No. 8037, C. C. S., adopted by the city of New Orleans on September 18, 1924, violates the Pourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

II.

The issue presented by that appeal is thus stated in the opinion which we therein handed down, to wit:

> “The question in this case is whether an ordinance of the city of New Orleans, providing for segregation of the residences of white and colored persons, violates the Pourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. * * *

> “The learned counsel for the defendant frankly state that they desire not to evade the issue as to whether the statutes [authorizing the ordinance] and the ordinance are valid in so far as they forbid negro tenants to occupy the defendant’s cottage [in a *white*neighborhood].”

III.

And upon the issue thus stated our *ruling*was as follows:

> *Our conclusion is that the statutes and the ordinance in that respect are valid.*(Italics by the present writer.)

And accordingly the judgment appealed from was *reversed*and the case remanded.

IV.

Thereupon the district judge granted plaintiff a preliminary injunction, restraining the defendant from renting said premises to negro tenants as homes, residences or places of abode; it being *admitted*that said premises are in a *ivllite*neighborhood, and that defendant intended, in violation of the ordinance, to rent the same to negro tenants as homes, residences, and places of abode.

And in due course there was judgment below *overruling*defendant’s attack on the statutes and the ordinance on the ground th^t they violate the Pourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and *perpetuating*the injunction issued as aforesaid. Prom which judgment defendant now appeals. '

V.

We *adhere*to our former ruling herein, and to the reasons therefor assigned, as reported in 104 So. 200, 158 La. 439.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore *affirmed.*
K.T., Father of B.T, a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-348

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021323EN.01003201.xml

| 11.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/32

---

P9_TA(2020)0122

Temporary measures concerning the general meetings of European companies (SEs) and of European Cooperative Societies (SCEs) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 May 2020 on the draft Council regulation on temporary measures concerning the general meetings of European companies (SEs) and of European Cooperative Societies (SCEs) (07648/2020 — C9-0133/2020 — 2020/0073(APP))

(Special legislative procedure — consent)

(2021/C 323/17)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council regulation (07648/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council regulation (07648/2020),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0133/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0133/2020),

| — | having regard to Rules 105(1) and (4) and 163 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 105(1) and (4) and 163 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20899

Conference Calendar

__________________

CURTIS MACK LEWIS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

M. B. THALER, GEORGE R. PIERSON,

R. S. ROBERT, CURTIS D. JOHNSON,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-95-1225

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Curtis Mack Lewis appeals from the district court's order

dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(d). He argues that prison personnel were

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in

prohibiting him from kneeling in line while waiting to obtain his
No. 95-20899

-2-

medication. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error.

 On appeal, Lewis can present no legal points arguable on

their merits, and the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution

Lewis that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Lewis is

further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have

been previously decided by this court.

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zeolite Exploration Company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Alan Brandys, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 26th day of April, 2005.



| | /s/ Alan Brandys                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Alan Brandys                                       
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           When will the next great quake strike northern California?      

      January 1, 1996    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441

## Related Content

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441

### Contacts

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441
Clifford LINDQUIST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1696

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

Clifford Lindquist, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Lindquist v. State*, 140 So. 3d 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); *Lindquist v. State*, 968 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Bizzell v. State*, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; *Salters v. State*, 840 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; *Harris v. State*, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; *Hill v. State*, 804 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

LaROSE, C.J., and CRENSHAW and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

          - 7 CFR Part 301
          - [Docket No. APHIS-2009-0036]

      ( print page 27423)    

### Correction

In rule document E9-13051 beginning on page 26774 in the issue of Thursday, June 4, 2009, make the following correction:

§ 301.89-3

On page 26776, in §301.890-3(g), in the third column, in the tenth line from the bottom of the page, “-1114.687198” should read “-114.687198”

[FR Doc. Z9-13051 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
PDF.js viewer 2/19/22, 9:49 AM

https://onlineservices.miami-dadeclerk.com/officialrecords/pdfjsviewer/web/viewer.html Page 1 of 6

EXHIBIT C

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-3 Filed 03/08/22 Page 1 of 6
PDF.js viewer 2/19/22, 9:49 AM

https://onlineservices.miami-dadeclerk.com/officialrecords/pdfjsviewer/web/viewer.html Page 2 of 6

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-3 Filed 03/08/22 Page 2 of 6
PDF.js viewer 2/19/22, 9:49 AM

https://onlineservices.miami-dadeclerk.com/officialrecords/pdfjsviewer/web/viewer.html Page 3 of 6

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-3 Filed 03/08/22 Page 3 of 6
PDF.js viewer 2/19/22, 9:49 AM

https://onlineservices.miami-dadeclerk.com/officialrecords/pdfjsviewer/web/viewer.html Page 4 of 6

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-3 Filed 03/08/22 Page 4 of 6
PDF.js viewer 2/19/22, 9:49 AM

https://onlineservices.miami-dadeclerk.com/officialrecords/pdfjsviewer/web/viewer.html Page 5 of 6

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-3 Filed 03/08/22 Page 5 of 6
PDF.js viewer 2/19/22, 9:49 AM

https://onlineservices.miami-dadeclerk.com/officialrecords/pdfjsviewer/web/viewer.html Page 6 of 6

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-3 Filed 03/08/22 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32
 
 Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the  Company ) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report ), we, Angelo De Caro and Robert F. OConnell, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Angelo De CaroAngelo De CaroChief Executive Officer/s/ Robert F. OConnellRobert F. OConnellChief Financial Officer
 
 May 13, 2004
Photos from the most recent dive survey done by the EPA Region 10 dive team. Cordova, AK 2010

Photo of fresh waste with fish roe

Trident South Outfall (inner diameter 8”)Wastepile

Seastar on wastepileWaste on seafloor

Waste movement during tidal exchangeNew waste

Old WasteMollusk on top of old waste

Cancer crabs on top of old wasteFresh waste on an old wastepile
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Klaus Moeller, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant
to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

         (1) the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant
for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), to which this statement is
filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated:  August 12, 2004                 By:  /s/ Klaus Moeller
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Klaus Moeller
                                             Chief Executive Officer and Interim
                                             Chief Financial Officer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

13105

Vol. 63, No. 51

Tuesday, March 17, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Parts 1000 and 1005

[Docket No. FR–4170–F–16]

RIN 2577–AB74

Implementation of the Native American

Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Act of 1996; Final Rule

Correction

In rule document 98–6283, beginning

on page 12334, in the issue of Thursday,

March 12, 1998, make the following

corrections:

PART 1000—[CORRECTED]

1. Appendices A and B to part 1000

that appear on pages 12373 through

12374 should appear immediately

following § 1000.558.

§ 1005.101 [Corrected]

2. On page 12372, in the second

column, in § 1005.101, in the 14th line,

after ‘‘and’’ insert ‘‘, after November 3,

1998,’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Part 191

[T.D. 98–16]

RIN 1515–AB95

Drawback

Correction

In rule document 98–5045 beginning

on page 10970, in the issue of Thursday,

March 5, 1998, make the following

correction:

Appendix A to Part 191 [Corrected]

On page 11041, in appendix A to part

191, in the table, in each parallel

column, remove the last entry.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
***********************************************The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it wasreleased as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods fo r filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion.

All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appella te Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the adva nce release version of an opinion and the latest version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports , the latest version is to
be considered authoritative.

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official repo rts are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, Stat e of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
***********************************************STATE v. ROBLES—FIRST CONCURRENCE AND DISSENT
D’AURIA, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part

.I agree with part I of the majority opinion but respectfully dissent from part II. My dissent from part II of the majority opinion is based on my agreement with twoparts of Justice Mullins’ concurring and dissenting opinion. First, I agree with Justice Mullins that the record fairly reflects the parties’ intent to submit the stipulation

in relation to both counts two and three and that the trial court in fact admitted it for those purposes. Second, I agree with Justice Mullins that the trial court properly took judicial notice of General Statutes §§ 29-28 and 29-30 to support its determination that, in light of the parties’ stipulation that the defendant, Ulises Robles, had been convicted of two felonies in 2006, he could not have had a proper permit for the gun that the trialcourt found he possessed while occupying a motor vehicle during the incident that led to his conviction. I therefore conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2017) § 29-38 (a). I would affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects and not reach the other issues discussed in part II of both the majority opinion and Justice Mullins’ concurring and dissenting opinion.