alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE


INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to
the Independent Contractor Agreement (the “Agreement”) is effective as of May 9, 2017 and is by and between PROVECTUS
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and BRUCE HOROWITZ, a California citizen (the “Contractor”).
Collectively the Company and the Contractor shall be referred to herein as “the Parties.”


 


WHEREAS, the Company previously
entered into the Agreement effective April 19, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and
the Contractor wish to amend certain terms of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for good
and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed:


 


1.       Amendments.


 








		(d)	Payment
                                         for Services is hereby deleted in its entirety and insert in lieu thereof
                                         the following:



 


For services rendered under this
Agreement, Contractor shall receive $125 per hour, up to a maximum of $20,000 per calendar month. Invoices indicating payment
and expenses owed shall be submitted to the Company bi-weekly. Payment shall be made to Capital Strategists, LLC within 7 days
following the Company’s receipt of each such invoice, unless there is a bona fide dispute over the amount or other terms
of an invoice, in which case the Company shall pay the undisputed amount only.


 


2.       Reaffirmation.
Other than as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. This Amendment contains the entire
agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior agreements or understandings
between the Parties, written or oral, respective the subject matter hereof. If there is any conflict between the terms and provision
so this Amendment and the terms and provisions of the Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall govern.


 


3.       Governing
Law. This Amendment will be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Tennessee without regard to any conflicts
of law principles that would require the application of any other law.


 


[Signatures contained on the following page.]


 




    	 



    	 	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have duly executed this Agreement or caused this Agreement to be executed on this 9th day of May, 2017.


 


	 	Bruce Horowitz
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Bruce Horowitz
	 	Contractor
	 	 	 
	 	PROVECTUS
    BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	
	 	By:	/s/
    Timothy C. Scott, Ph.D.
	 	 	                                          
	 	Title:	President


 




    	2
Sereeta PLANNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ROGERS GROUP, INC. v. T. W. COMER, ET AL 

### .

Chancery Court for Sumner County

No. 99C-351 No. M2000-01928-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 15, 2001

ORDER In acco rda nce with the opinion of this court in Elizabeth Nicoll Dor amus, et al. v. Roge

rs Group, Inc., and T. W. Comer, No. M1998-00918-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2001), the judgment of the court below

is affirmed and the

cause isremanded to the Chancery Court of Sumner Cou nty f or an y fur the r pr ocee din gs th at m ay bec ome nece ssa ry. Tax the costs on appe

al to the appellan

t, James V. Doramus,

on behalf of Elizabeth Nicoll Doramus and Victo

ria Lyn n Doramus.

_________________________________________

BEN H. CANTREL

L, PRESIDI

NG JUDGE, M.S.

_________________________________________ WILLIA M B. CAIN, JUDGE

_________________________________________ PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, JUDGE
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION

I, Mary W. Patterson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trans-Century
Resources, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003

/s/ Mary W. Patterson
---------------------
Mary W. Patterson
Chief Executive Officer
Matthew LADD, Appellant, v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4103

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 6, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - nevada(1)

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

State News Release        April 3, 2014        Natural Perchlorate Levels in a Desert Ecosystem

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

State News Release        February 17, 2015        Dr. Jill Baron New Director of North American Nitrogen Center

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 8234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02922]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixty-Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Sixty-Third meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 11-14, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Embry-Riddle University, 3700 
Willow Creek Road, Prescott, AZ 86301-3720.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or Sophie Bousquet, sbousquet@rtca.org, 202-330-0663.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 135. The agenda will 
include the following:

March 11-14

     Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions.
     Introduce FAA Representative.
     Approval of Summary from the Sixty Second Meeting--(RTCA 
Paper No. 266-13/SC135-695).
     Review open proposal's for User's Guide's.
     Review Working Group Draft's.
     Introduction.
     Section 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26.
     Order of Test Clarification.
     DO160G Training/Content discussion.
     New/Unfinished Business.
     Errata Sheet.
     Schedule for Users Guide.
     Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting.
     Other Business.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 5, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-02922 Filed 2-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[J-43-2016] [M.O. - Wecht, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**DANIEL E. TAYLOR AND WILLIAM TAYLOR, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE**  **ESTATE OF ANNA MARIE TAYLOR,**

**DECEASED**

**v.**

**EXTENDICARE HEALTH FACILITIES,**

**INC. D/B/A HAVENCREST NURSING CENTER; EXTENDICARE HOLDINGS,**  **INC.; EXTENDICARE HEALTH FACILITY HOLDINGS, INC.; EXTENDICARE**  **HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; EXTENDICARE REIT; EXTENDICARE,**  **L.P.; EXTENDICARE, INC.; MON VALE NON ACUTE CARE SERVICE, INC.**  **D/B/A THE RESIDENCE AT HILLTOP; MON-VALE HEALTH RESOURCES, INC;**  **JEFFERSON HEALTH SERVICES, D/B/A**

**JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL**

**CENTER**

**APPEAL OF: EXTENDICARE HEALTH FACILITIES, INC., D/B/A HAVENCREST**  **NURSING CENTER, EXTENDICARE HOLDINGS, INC., EXTENDICARE**  **HEALTH FACILITY HOLDINGS, INC., EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES,**  **INC., EXTENDICARE REIT, EXTENDICARE, L.P. AND**  **EXTENDICARE, INC. :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 19 WAP 2015** 

**Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered April 2, 2015 at No. 2028**  **WDA 2013, affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington**  **County entered November 20, 2013 at**

**No. 2012-6878.**

**ARGUED: April 5, 2016**

CONCURRING OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: SEPTEMBER 28, 201 6**[J-43-2016] [M.O. - Wecht, J.] - 2**

**I join the majority’s holding and analysis, although I do not fully support some of** 

**the collateral descriptions suggestive of social policy jud gments.** 

**Justice Baer joins this concurring opinion.**
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with Annual Report of New Dragon Asia Corp. and its subsidiaries
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 25, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Peter Mak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                March
                26, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Peter
                MakName:Peter
                MakTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE DI STRI CT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) I n re B L ACK FA RMERS DI SCR I MI NATI ON ) Misc. No. 08-0511 (PL F) L I TI GATI ON ) __________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Pending be fore the Court is the Updated Motion by Class Counsel for Awa

rd of Attorney s’ Fe es and Expenses, filed on Septe mber 24, 2012. The defe ndant has filed a response , and cla ss counsel have filed a r eply brief suppor

ted by sever al af

fidavits. I n their filing s, class counsel have off

ere d to provide more de tailed information re g ardingthe hours they have w orked both leading up to the Court’s final appr oval of the Settlement Agree ment following the Fa irness Hea ring and the implementation of that final order over the last fourtee n months. Upon consideration of the parties’ filings a nd the re levant ca se law, the Court sees no nee d to make such a r equest of c lass counsel. In addition, after car efully revie wing the motions papers a nd the rele vant ca se law, the Court does not believe it would be a ssisted by an ora l arg ument or other incourt proc eeding s with respec t to the pending motion. The Court theref ore w ill decide the Motion for Awa

rd of Attorne y s’ Fe es and Expenses base d on the pape rs that have been f iled. I t is the Court’s intention to i ssue a de cision in J anuar y 2013. SO ORDERED.

/s/ PAULL . FRI EDMAN DATE: De cembe r 7, 2012 United States District J udg e
Exhibit 32.1   NOVA STAR INNOVATIONS, INC.   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Nova Star Innovations, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  March 18, 2011/s/ Mark S. Clayton
Mark S. Clayton
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60730
FRED COLE Plaintiff - Appellant v. NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:05-CV-479 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Having reviewed the district court’s order, the parties’ briefs, and the record and having heard oral argument, we affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned and comprehensive order. AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 12, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
NORMAN Y. MINETA 

S A N JOS E 

n^PARTWENTOF, 

•"-^.^NSPORT/VnON,. 

:AET OPERATIONS 

Vm OCT "U P 2-5U 

INTERNATIONAL 

AIRPOR T 

August 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretarj' 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington D.C. 

Dear Secretarj' LaHood^ 

I write to express our support for (he application by Ventura County/Oxnard Airport (OXR) for a 

Small Community Air Service Develojjment grant that projjoaes the establishment of air service 

between Oxnard and Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC). Besides the Oxnard ticket 

purchase program of $480,000, SJC has a piogiani that will waive all aviation fees for the first 

year for these new flights. 

Located in the heart of Silicon Valley, SJC has recently completed a very successful and 

comprehensive modernization of all our terminal facilities that makes us a very attractive and 

efficient airport for the high technology businesses that surround us. We are very supportive of 

efforts that can lead to additional air service to other communities within California that have 

business interests in Silicon Valley, hicreased air service would provide greater convenience, and 

it would enhance economic development for our region, contiinunities served by other airports, 

and California in general. 

Currently most tntra-California air service is mostly confined to larger airports, leaving the 

residents and businesses in smaller communities poorly served. Ventura County/Oxnard Airport 

could be effectively served by smaller aircraft such as used by Horizon Air in the Alaska Air 

Group. Today, Horizon offers service from SJC to Portland, Boise, Sacramento, Spokane, and 

soon T.,os Angeles. Their Q400 aircraft is ideally suited to intra-California stage lengths and 

would be very competitive compared to other aircraft, and service between Oxnard and San Jose 

would be strategic complement Horizon's system in California. 

On behalf of both SJC and OXR, wc endorse the efforts to provide seivice between our airports, 

and we look forward (o a successful outcome for the SCASD grant application of Ventura 

County/Oxnard Airport. 

Sincei'ely, 

itfvtil £ •Si 

S AN JOSE 

rjiMMToriiuccM v.uuv 1732 N. f liM Slicel, Suite 6C0 • San Jose, CA 95n2 • lei; -lOS.Ml.rtOO • fan: 108.673.1675 • viwv.slc.onj •
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5161 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5161

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the qualifications for 
    licensed mental health counselors of the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2016

  Mr. Mullin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the qualifications for 
    licensed mental health counselors of the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH 
              COUNSELORS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 7402(b)(11)(A) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting ``or equivalent degree'' after ``master's degree''.
                                 <all>
```
# Gowan The Go To Company P.O. Box 5569 AYuma, AZ 85366-5569 APhone(928) 783-8844A FAX [928] 343-9255 May 19, 2015 Document Processing Desk (7505P) Office ofPesticide Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency One Potomac Yard (South Bldg) 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3553
ATTN: Shaja Joyner, PM #20

Fungicide Branch, Registration Division RE: Thiophanate-Methyl Technical, EPA Reg No 10163-291 and 10163-292

Voluntarycancellation oftechnical registration Gowan Company has withdrawn from theThiophanate-Methyl Task Force and is now requesting the voluntary cancellation ofthe following technical registration forthiophanatemethyl: • Thiophanate Methyl Technical (10163-291), 98.4% purity. • Thiophanate-Methyl Technical (10163-292), 95.1% purity. If I can provide you with any further information or answer any questions please contact me either by e-mail atefolev@qowanco.com or by phone at (928) 539-5475.
Kind regardsEmily Foley Gowan Corfipal Registration Specialist Tracking #: 578598444883
CPPM THP LLC and AMP/CPL-THP Property, LLC, Petitioners, v. CCP HARBOUR ISLAND LLC; Jackson's Bistro and Bar, L.C.; and Manor At Harbour Island, LLC, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-753

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Brian Albert SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.