alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ivty_Ex10_2


		
			Exhibit 10.2
		

		
			 
		

		
			INVUITY, INC.
		

		
			RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT DEFERRAL PROGRAM FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
		

		
			TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DEFERRED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT
		

		
			 
		

		
			Deferred RSU Award Notice (this “Award Notice”) for:_________________________________
		

		
			 
		

		
			This Award Notice evidences the award of deferred Restricted Stock Units (each, a “Deferred RSU” or collectively, the “Deferred RSUs”) that have been granted to, [NAME], by Invuity, Inc. (the “Company”), subject to the terms of the Invuity, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), this Award Notice and the Invuity, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Deferral Program for Outside Directors (the “Program”), which collectively constitute an Award Agreement (as such term is defined in the Plan). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Program and the Plan, as applicable.
		

		
			 
		

		
			The following summarizes your Deferred RSUs under the Program and the Plan:
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						Award:

					
					
						Each Deferred RSU entitles you to receive in the future one Share of Common Stock of the Company.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Date Issued:

					
					
						[_________]

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Number of Deferred RSUs:

					
					
						[__________], subject to adjustment as provided under Section 9 of the Program and Section 14 of the Plan.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Vesting and Distribution of Award:

					
					
						Your specific vesting and payment terms are set forth in the Program.  

					
						 

					
						As a general matter, your Deferred RSUs will be paid out in Shares at the time of your Separation from Service, death, or Disability, or upon a Change in Control, in a single lump sum as soon as administratively practicable after the date of such triggering event, within the time frames set forth in the Program.

				



		
			 
		

		
			The Deferred RSUs are granted pursuant to the terms of the Program and the Plan. By electing to participate in the Program, you hereby consent to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Award Notice, the Program and the Plan.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			You also hereby acknowledge that you have received or been given access to copies of the Program, the Plan, and the Plan Prospectus. Please refer to the Program, Plan and the Plan Prospectus for important information about the Program and Deferred RSUs, including tax considerations.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dated:            [__________]
Hasmukhbai PATEL, a/k/a Hasmukh Patel and Hemuben Patel, a/k/a Hemu Patel, Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS BANK, FSB, as Trustee FOR STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 30, 2018

Eric O. Husby, Tampa, for Appellants.

Thomas Wade Young and Joseph B. Towne, of Lender Legal Services, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Hasmukhbai Patel and Hemuben Patel appeal the trial court's nonfinal order denying their motion to quash constructive service of process in the foreclosure action brought by Wilmington Savings Bank, FSB, as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A ("the Bank"), against the Patels. Because the trial court did not rule that it obtained personal jurisdiction over the Patels, but instead determined only that it had in rem jurisdiction, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this nonfinal order and we dismiss the appeal. *See**Archer v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n*, 220 So.3d 477, 478-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (dismissing appeal because nonfinal order denying mortgagor's motion to quash constructive service of process did not refer to personal jurisdiction and no assertion of personal jurisdiction was made in trial court); *Koniecpolski v. Stelnicki*, 571 So.2d 577, 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (dismissing appeal because Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i) does not vest jurisdiction in this Court over nonfinal order denying motion to quash constructive service of process in foreclosure proceeding when order does not determine jurisdiction of person).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Lisa F. SELDEN n/k/a Lisa F. Lehman, Appellant, v. John M. SELDEN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2893

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<page>									EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 14, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-109291 and No. 333-111856) pertaining to the AMIS Holdings, Inc.’s Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively, of our reports datedFebruary 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of AMIS Holdings, Inc., AMIS Holdings, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of AMIS Holdings, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

February 27, 2007
M.A., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kenneth LURRY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0383

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - (-)documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

              - 2021(1)

file  MOU between USGS and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat

Posters        July 14, 2014        Geologic Map of Mars

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Handout, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Fill-in-the-blank, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Poster, PDF)

Posters        December 31, 1998        Mapping Shipping Hazards in San Francisco Bay, 1997-1998

Policy and Directives        November 14, 2019        Final PEIs with Appendicies

Reference Materials        December 11, 2017        All water on Earth in a sphere, placed over a "dry" globe

Technical Memos        April 7, 1997        TM97-04S Collection, processing, and analysis of ground-water samples for tritium/helium-3 dating;
Richard B. ROEDERER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Joanne J. ROEDERER, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-0416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2020312EN.01000601.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/6

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 1 July 2019 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.37956(2) – Ronds à Beton

Rapporteur: Austria

(2020/C 312/05)

1.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s finding that the limitation period has not expired.

2.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

3.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

4.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to an aggravating circumstance for one of the parties.

5.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the application of mitigating circumstances for two parties for their non-participation, for a limited period, in one of the limbs of the conduct.

6.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the application of an extraordinary mitigating circumstance in this case.

7.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the amount of the extraordinary mitigating circumstance.

8.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the amount of the reduction of the fine based on the 1996 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases for one of the parties.

9.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

10.

The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

faq        July 7, 2017        How does carbon get into the atmosphere?

faq        April 12, 2019        Does Landsat Level-1 data processing include atmospheric correction?

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

faq        April 15, 2022        Why does my Landsat Collection 2  Surface Temperature product have missing data?

faq        June 29, 2017        How does acid precipitation affect marble and limestone buildings?

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)
Richard BRIDGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 30, 2018

Richard E. Bridges, Blountstown, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*276AFFIRMED without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. *See**Rosa v. State* , 147 So.3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

COHEN, C.J. and EVANDER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - (-)products_data(4)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(82)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_image(12)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_video(30)
              - multimedia_video-149194(28)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - (-)california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

Data Release        April 15, 2024        Landslides triggered by the February 2019 atmospheric river storm, western Riverside County, California, USA

Data Release        June 23, 2023        Field-verified inventory of postfire hydrologic response for the 2020 CZU Lightning Complex, River, Camel, and Dolan Fires following a 26-29 January 2021 atmospheric river storm sequence

Data Release        May 28, 2019        Atmospheric-loading frequency response functions and groundwater-levels filtered for the effects of atmospheric loading and solid Earth tides for three monitoring wells near Mammoth Lakes, California, 2015 - 2017

Data Release        August 20, 2021        Composite multibeam bathymetry surface and data sources of the southern Cascadia Margin offshore Oregon and northern California
<page>                                     EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management LLC,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		May 15, 2009
Bed XAVIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 12.1  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Manuel Sánchez Ortega, Chief Executive Officer of Abengoa S.A. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: June 6, 2014   By:
/s/ Manuel Sánchez OrtegaName:
Manuel Sánchez OrtegaTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
Mitsou LAFORTUNE and Damocles Lafortune, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., as Trustee ON BEHALF OF the HOLDER OF the HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATE SERIES 2007-1 ALBERTELLI LAW FIRM, Appellees.

No. 1D17-5321

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of InterMetro Communications, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Charles Rice, Chief
      Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                April 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Charles RiceCharles
                Rice, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
                Executive Officer)




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.