alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
uctt-ex102_109.htm



Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT TO

OFFER LETTER AND CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

This Amendment (this "Amendment") relating to that certain Offer Letter, dated December 29, 2014, by and between Jim Scholhamer (the "Executive") and Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") (the "Offer Letter"), and that certain Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2015, by and between the Executive and the Company (the "CIC Agreement" and, together with the Offer Letter, the "Executive Agreements"), is made as of July 25, 2017.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, each of the Executive and the Company desires to amend the Executive Agreements as set forth herein in order to make the definition of Cause in the Executive Agreements consistent with the definition of Cause in the Company's Severance Benefits for Executive Officers policy, as amended as of the date hereof (the "Severance Policy").

AGREEMENT

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.Amendments of the Executive Agreements. The Executive Agreements are hereby amended as follows:

(1)For purposes of the Severance Policy and the CIC Agreement, the definition of "Cause" is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

"Cause" means: (A) you are convicted of, or plead guilty or no contest to, a criminal offense; (b) you engage in any act of fraud or dishonesty; (C) you breach any agreement with the Company; (D) you commit any material violation of Company policy; or (E) you fail, refuse or neglect to perform the services required of you in your position at the Company.

B.At-will Employment. Nothing in this Amendment or in the Executive Agreements changes the at-will nature of employment of the Executive.

C.Miscellaneous.

(I)Entire Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Executive Agreements, represents the entire agreement between Executive and the Company and its affiliates with respect to the subject matter herein, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous discussions, negotiations, and agreements concerning such subject matter.

(2)Governing  Law. This  Amendment  shall be governed  by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California without reference to principles of conflict of laws.

(3)Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were on the same instrument.

[Signatures Follow]





 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered in its name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first written above.

 


	
ULTRA  CLEAN  HOLDINGS, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Clarence Granger

	
Name:
	
 
	
Clarence Granger

	
Title:
	
 
	
Chairman




 


	
EXECUTIVE

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Jim Scholhamer

	
Name:
	
 
	
Jim Scholhamer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Coastal breach in St. Augustine, Florida caused by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Breach on Portsmouth Island in North Carolina caused by Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Part of the Outer Banks in North Carolina eroded by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        February 10, 2023        Boulder, Colorado

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        GOES-16 and Landsat 8

Interviews        July 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 97 – EROS 50th: Earth As Art Bonus

Interviews        September 15, 2010        Making Waves: Hypoxia in U.S. Coastal Waters

Interviews        May 10, 2010        Recovery Act Funds Benefit Louisiana Black Bears

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
John Wallace GORDON, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5008

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual report of Knobias,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, E. Key Ramsey,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  August 31, 2006                          By: /s/ E. KEY RAMSEY
                                                  ------------------
                                                  E. Key Ramsey
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Matthew STROJEK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0400

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Wayne Maurice MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3257

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
G. S. L., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
COLINA INSURANCE LIMITED, Appellant, v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d/b/a Memorial Healthcare System, and Sanus Health Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D18-193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(188)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2005)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(228)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(15)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - (-)news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

newsletter        January 10, 2022      The Monitor newsletter - Vol. 5 | Issue Winter 2022

newsletter        October 5, 2023      Latest in Landsat - October 2023 - Vol. 2 | Issue 10
Dirk SCHUSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Derrick GOREE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen Laurence GATZKE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Donald Lee LEGER, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0992

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Denied.
March 5, 2002


Arthur Andersen LLP
711 Louisiana Street,
Suite 1300
Houston, Texas 77002

For the period from August 1, 2001 (the date of formation of the Partnership) to December 31, 2001, GEMSA Loan Services, L.P.'s (GEMSA) servicing of multi-family and commercial mortgage loans has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program  for Mortgage Bankers. In addition, GEMSA's Fidelity Bond policy provides coverage of up to $50,000,000 and GEMSA's Errors and Omissions policy provides coverage of up to $47,500,000 as of December 31, 2001.

Joseph Beggins
CEO
Gene Allen BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: BlackbirdMine

Filters

              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(21)

## By Location

## By Year

Photography        March 14, 2016        Banded Siltite at the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        March 14, 2016        Transition Measurement at the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        August 30, 2012        Quartz Vein in the Gunsight Formation

Photography        August 30, 2012        Biotite-Rich Rock in the Gunsight Formation

Photography        August 30, 2012        Cross-Bedded Sandstone in the Gunsight Formation

Photography        August 30, 2012        Discarded Drill Cores from the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        August 30, 2012        Mylonitic Breccia near the Gunsight Formation

Photography        August 30, 2012        Limonite-stained Siltite near the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        August 30, 2012        Apple Creek Banded Siltite near the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        August 30, 2012        Deep Creek Road Banded Siltite

Photography        August 30, 2012        Small-scale Syncline near the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        August 30, 2012        Biotitic Meta-Sandstone in the Gunsight Formation

Photography        March 14, 2016        Mineral Stains at the No Name Prospect

Photography        March 14, 2016        Breccia at the Apple Creek Formation

Photography        March 14, 2016        Northeast Rim of the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        March 14, 2016        Copper-Stained Banded Siltite at the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        March 14, 2016        Searching for Sulfides at the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        March 14, 2016        Biotitic Mafic Dike at the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        March 14, 2016        Metasedimentary Rocks at the Apple Creek Formation

Photography        March 14, 2016        A Gossan at the Blackbird Cobalt-Copper Mine

Photography        August 31, 2011        A Rainbow Trout Rests Among Cobble Substrate in Panther Creek
1

Filed 7/7/15 Smith v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). Th is opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ROBERT SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

RIVE RSIDE COUNTY,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest. E063336

(Super.Ct.No. ICR15111)

OPINION

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. James S. Hawkins,

Judge. Petition is granted.

Robert Smith, Jr., in pro. per., for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Michael A. Hestrin, District Attorney, Alan D. Tate, Deputy District Attorney, for

Real Party in Interest.2 DISCUSSION

Trial courts have little discretion to deny a request for post

- conviction discovery

under Pe nal Code section 1054.9. (See Catlin v. Superior Court (2011) 51 Cal.4th 300.)

As the statute does not provide for representation by counsel (cf. Pen. Code, § 1405,

which does provide for the appointment of counsel when a defendant seeks DNA testing),

co urts should not impose unnecessary procedural bars. While it is not entirely clear how

petitioner presented his request to the trial court, we are persuaded that he is entitled to a

point

- by

- point determination on the merits of his requests.

We are not persuaded that the statute requires petitioner to first request discovery

from the People, and at this point, given the time which has been expended, it seems

preferable in any event to place the matter before the trial court for a final resolution

rather than to inject additional delay.

We do not mean that trial courts a re obliged to rule on requests that do not meet

the statutory requirements, but we note that petitioner has now established that he cannot

obtain the desired materials from trial counsel. Insofar as he requests materials to which

he would not have been entitled at trial, and which are therefore not covered by Penal

Code section 1054.9, the trial court may of course deny relief.

DISPOSITION

On April 27, 2015, petitioner filed a motion to s eal declaration in support of the

petition for writ of mandate. Petitioner’s request to seal the declaration is granted;

however, the declaration was not significant to this court’s decision.3

The petition for writ of mandate is granted in part. Let a per emptory writ of

mandate issue, directing the Superior Court of Riverside County to vacate its order

denying petitioner’s request, and to reconsider the request on the merits.

Petitioner is directed to prepare and have the peremptory writ of mandate issue d,

copies served, and the original filed with the clerk of this court, together with proof of

service on all parties.

In the int erest of justice

, this order shall be final forthwith.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

RAMIREZ

P. J.

We concur:

H OLLENHORST

J.

KING

J.
Edward CARRASQUILLO, Appellant, v. Michael HENDERSON, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134779 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134779 COA: 276160 St. Clair CC: 02-001479-FC HARRY JACOB WALTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Jonathan DELEON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1476

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - (-)news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

newsletter        January 10, 2022      The Monitor newsletter - Vol. 5 | Issue Winter 2022

newsletter        October 5, 2023      Latest in Landsat - October 2023 - Vol. 2 | Issue 10

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0408 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANGELA SPROUT ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 14, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2020

08/07/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0408
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(16)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(349)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(16)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(14)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(115)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(92)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(20)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(27)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149220(2)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(8)
              - (-)other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

## By Year

General        October 22, 2020        Landsat Captures Images of Australian Blazes

General        October 22, 2020        November 15, 2019 - Celebrating 40 years of Landsat at the Alice Springs Ground Station

General        September 21, 2020        USGS Landsat Ground Stations
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay impact structure

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(81)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(6)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!

Presentations and Events        February 15, 2023        Mississippi River Science Forum: Part 1

Presentations and Events        February 25, 2020        Lidar Surface Water in Stormwater Network; Updated DC Watersheds

Presentations and Events        March 28, 2019        PubTalk 3/2019 - Land Subsidence

Presentations and Events        December 31, 2000        2000 NASA TERRA Press Conference Releasing Data From The Satellite

Presentations and Events        October 13, 2022        New Water Cycle Diagram REVEALED