alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 111 (Friday, June 9, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 30682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50609]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: 

AVA CELESTE BENJAMIN,

Debtor.

_____________________________/

CASE NO. 22-11124-AJC

Chapter 13

LUGANO CAPITAL, INC.’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

Secured creditor, LUGANO CAPITAL, INC., D/B/A “START AUTO FINANCE”

(“Creditor”), through counsel and pursuant to Sections 105 and 1325,

1

files this Objection to 

Confirmation (“Objection”) of the Chapter 13 Plan (“Plan”) [ECF #2] filed by debtor, AVA 

CELESTE BENJAMIN (“Debtor”), and in support states: 

1. On February 11, 2022 (“Petition Date”), Debtor voluntarily filed for relief under 

Chapter 13.

2. On June 26, 2018, Debtor executed a Retail Installment Contract and Security 

Agreement (“Agreement”) pertaining to the purchase of a 2008 INFINITI EX35; VIN: 

JNKAJ09E18M304148. 

3. The Plan should not be confirmed under Section 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) because the 

value, on the effective date of the Plan, of property to be distributed under the Plan to Creditor on 

account of its claim is less than the allowed amount of Creditor’s secured claim. The Plan appears 

to understate the value of the vehicle. The replacement (retail) value of the vehicle is at least 

$4,675.00 (not $500.00, as estimated by Debtor).

1 All references to “Chapter” and “Section” refer to the Bankruptcy Code appearing in Title 11 of the United States 

Code; all references to a “Rule” refer to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; and all references to a "Local 

Rule" refer to the Local Rules of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Case 22-11124-AJC Doc 18 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. The payoff on Debtor’s account with Creditor, as of the Petition Date, is $9,992.94.

5. Debtor further objects to Debtor’s understatement of the interest rate at 3.25%, 

when Creditor is entitled to interest at 23.99%. 

6. Creditor further objects to any portion of its claim being disallowed and stricken.

7. Creditor requires updated proof of collision and comprehensive insurance.

WHEREFORE, Creditor requests that confirmation of Debtor’s Plan be denied.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United 

States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in 

compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court 

set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Dated: February 25, 2022. Respectfully submitted: 

s/ Matthew S. Kish 

Matthew S. Kish, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 491640 

Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A.

7777 Glades Road, Suite 400

Boca Raton, FL 33434

Phone: 561.477.7800

Fax: 561.477.7722

Email: mkish@sbwh.law

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 25, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was served upon all parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service for this 

case via the Court’s CM/ECF System and/or U.S. mail to the parties listed below.

s/ Matthew S. Kish

Matthew S. Kish 

Case 22-11124-AJC Doc 18 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 900
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       900
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               504
<OTHER-SE>                                            1596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          1342
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        325
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           325
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
# C_2021123EN.01008101.xml

| 9.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/81

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic road freight and road passenger connectivity following the end of the transition period mentioned in the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community’

(COM(2020) 826 final — 2020/0362 (COD))

(2021/C 123/14)

| Referrals | Council of the European Union, 11.12.2020
  European Parliament, 14.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 27.1.2021 |
| Plenary session No | 557 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | unanimous |

Referrals

Council of the European Union, 11.12.2020

European Parliament, 14.12.2020

Legal basis

Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

27.1.2021

Plenary session No

557

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

unanimous

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 557th plenary session of 27 and 28 January 2021 (meeting of 27 January), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 27 January 2021.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
Exhibit 10.11  TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION  The following table sets forth the Companys current compensation arrangements with its non-employee directors.  Annual Retainer:

$12,500 per calendar quarter ($50,000 annually)Board Meetings:

$1,500 for each meeting attended in excess of 10   during any calendar yearCommittee Meetings:

$1,500 per meeting ($750 if attended by telephone)Committee Chairs:

Audit CommitteeAnnual Retainer of $15,000Compensation CommitteeAnnual Retainer of $15,000Restricted Stock Grant:

Annual grant of restricted shares with an aggregate   market value of $115,000 on the date of grant, to vest in three equal annual   installments on the anniversary of the grant date.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PRSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of Innovative Companies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Mihir K. TanejaMihir K. Taneja Chief Executive Officer February 12, 2003




---



Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PRSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of Innovative Companies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Carol Dore-FalconeCarol Dore-Falcone Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 12, 2003
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Sidney H. Stein, District Judge for the U.S. District **

Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR BECERRA; JULIAN

ABRAHAM,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR

COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-56840

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-01606-JAHPOR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2013

Pasadena, California

Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and STEIN, District Judge.**

Appellants, Oscar Becerra and Julian Abraham, appeal the dismissal of their

FILED

JUN 18 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1291, and we affirm. 

The viability of Becerra’s and Abraham’s case depends entirely on whether

or not Mexican law prohibits Mexican nationals from driving an American rental

car into Mexico. Although the district court gave them four opportunities--in the

form of amended complaints--adequately to allege and to demonstrate the viability

of this necessary legal proposition, they failed to do so. As such, Appellants’

causes of action that are dependent upon the foreign law violation fail to state a

claim that crosses “the line from conceivable to plausible.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556

U.S. 662, 680 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

Appellants also fail to state a claim regarding the insurance policy. 

Assuming arguendo that Enterprise was Appellants’ insurance agent, Enterprise

was not negligent for failing to procure insurance for Appellants that would cover

legal issues in Mexico based upon Appellants’ request for insurance that would

“cover everything in Mexico.” See Jones v. Grewe, 234 Cal. Rptr. 717, 721 (Cal.

Ct. App. 1987). Enterprise did not conceal or misrepresent the terms of the policy,

which were written in both Spanish and English. Finally, Enterprise did not take

any action that frustrated Appellants’ rights under the policy. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Companys
Administrative Trustee certifies as follows:



| | (a) | This report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in this Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ E. J. Woodard, Jr. CLBB
|                     |  |  |  | E. J. Woodard, Jr. CLBB,   
|                     |  |  |  | Administrative Trustee
Pauletta HIGGINS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 96098-96099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28340]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2024-0962]

Special Local Regulations; Marine Events Within the Captain of 
the Port Charleston Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the special local regulation to 
provide for the safety and security of certain navigable waterways of 
Charleston Harbor during the Charleston Parade of Boats. Our regulation 
for marine events within the Captain of the Port Charleston identifies 
the regulated area for this event in Charleston Harbor, SC. During the 
enforcement periods, no person or vessel may enter, transit through, 
anchor in, or remain within the designated area unless authorized by 
the

[[Page 96099]]

Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) or a designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.704 will be enforced for the 
location identified in Table 1 to Sec.  100.704, Item 10, from 5 p.m. 
until 8 p.m. on December 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of enforcement, call or email Chief, Marine Science 
Technician Tyler Campbell, Sector Charleston Waterways Management 
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special 
local regulation in 33 CFR 100.704, Table 1 to Sec.  100.704, Item 10, 
for the Charleston Parade of Boats from 5 p.m. until 8 p.m. on December 
14, 2024. This action is being taken to provide for the safety of life 
on navigable waterways during this event. Our regulation for marine 
events within the Captain of the Port Charleston, Table 1 to Sec.  
100.704, item 10, specifies the location of the regulated area for the 
Charleston Parade of Boats which encompasses portions of the Charleston 
Harbor including Anchorage A, Shutes Folly, Horse Reach, Hog Island 
Reach, Town Creek Lower Reach, Ashley River, and finishing at City 
Marina. During the enforcement periods, as reflected in 33 CFR 
100.704(c), if you are the operator of a vessel in the regulated area 
you must comply with directions from the Patrol Commander or any 
official patrol vessel.
    In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal Register, 
the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this enforcement 
period via the Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, 
and on-scene designated representatives.

    Dated: November 26, 2024.
F.J. Delrosso,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2024-28340 Filed 12-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
```
Dustin CUEVAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE EX REL. Vidale G. TASBY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0898

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138565(85)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138565 COA: 277973 Jackson CC: 04-001070-FH ROBERT PHILLIPP CARICO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s August 6, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
Banco Bradesco S.A.Exhibit 13.2. CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Banco Bradesco S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 28, 2017  /s/ Alexandre da Silva Glüher_________________________Name: Alexandre da Silva GlüherTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Kimberly WHITE, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3793

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Randall WASSERMAN, Individually; Infusit, a California Corporation; Walu, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; and Fidelity One Credit Corp., a Utah Corporation, Appellants, v. WLHB, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, and HBT Investors, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Johnny CASAIGNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-285

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.