alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5322 

AN ACT 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate 

an exemption for companies located in Puerto Rico, the 

Virgin Islands, and any other possession of the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5322 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Territories Inves3 tor Protection Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a) of the Investment 

6 Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)) is amended 

7 by striking paragraph (1). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND SAFE HARBOR.— 

9 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in 

10 paragraph (2), the amendment made by subsection 

11 (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act. 

13 (2) SAFE HARBOR.—With respect to a company 

14 that is exempt under section 6(a)(1) of the Invest15 ment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)(1)) 

16 on the day before the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act, the amendment made by subsection (a) shall 

18 take effect on the date that is 3 years after the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

20 (3) EXTENSION OF SAFE HARBOR.—The Secu21 rities and Exchange Commission, by rule and regula22 tion upon its own motion, or by order upon applica23 tion, may conditionally or unconditionally, under sec24 tion 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 

25 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(c)), further delay the effective 

26 date for a company described in paragraph (2) for 
3 

•HR 5322 EH

1 a maximum of 3 years following the initial 3-year 

2 period if, before the end of the initial 3-year period, 

3 the Commission determines that such a rule, regula4 tion, motion, or order is necessary or appropriate in 

5 the public interest and for the protection of inves6 tors. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5322 

AN ACT 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to 

possession of the United States. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and any other terminate an exemption for companies located in
# C_2021316EN.01001201.xml

| 6.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/12

---

P9_TA(2020)0044

Regulation amending the Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 April 2020 on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 as regards the scope of the Global Margin for Commitments (07170/2020 — C9-0110/2020 –2020/0055(APP))

(Special legislative procedure — consent)

(2021/C 316/02)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council regulation (07170/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council regulation (07170/2020),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (C9-0110/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (C9-0110/2020),

| — | having regard to Rules 105(1) and (4) and 163 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 105(1) and (4) and 163 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Gives its consent to the draft Council regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 187 (Monday, September 28, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Pages 51638-51639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20928]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 51638]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 213

[Docket No. RST-90-1, Notice No. 8]
RIN 2130-AA75


Track Safety Standards

Correction

    In rule document 98-15932 beginning on page 33992 in the issue of 
Monday, June 22, 1998, make the following corrections:


Sec. 213.113  [Corrected]


Sec. 213.337  [Corrected]

    On pages 34035 and 34048, in Secs. 213.113(a)(2) and 213.337(a)(2), 
the table is corrected as set forth below:
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

[[Page 51639]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28SE98.059


BILLING CODE 1505-01-C
Case 22-11596-RAM Doc 47 Filed 06/28/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 22-11596-RAM Doc 47 Filed 06/28/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 22-11596-RAM Doc 47 Filed 06/28/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 22-11596-RAM Doc 47 Filed 06/28/22 Page 4 of 4
EX PARTE David L. BEASON

1160384 (CR-15-1281)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. CR002-EPA-1 Page 6 of 151

List of Accompanying Volumes (continued)

Vol. Category1 Volume/Study Title MRID

9 B

Kurtz, R. (2011). Insect Resistance Management Plan 

for Bt11xMIR604xTC1507x5307 Maize. NRA-106-11

1 – Categorization code for placement of documents in the Public Docket

Company Official: April 1, 2011 

David J. Mason, Jr., Ph.D. Date

Regulatory Affairs Manager

Company Name: Syngenta Seeds, Inc. - Field Crops - NAFTA

Company Contact: David J. Mason, Jr., Ph.D. / Tel. (919) 226-7377
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

30680

20-DEC-2013

08:38 AM
EXHIBIT 31.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Pioppi, President of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc.certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Goldeneye Capital
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 18, 2005

/s/ Joseph Pioppi
-----------------
Joseph Pioppi
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3462

___________ Montollie Warren, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Fort Dodge Correctional Facility; * Mike Babcock; Karen Anderson; * [UNPUBLISHED] Cornell Smith; John Baldwin; * Tom Conley, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 19, 2010 Filed: April 23, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Montollie Warren appeals the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment to Fort Dodge Correctional Facility (FDCF) and several prison officials, and denying Warren’s Federal Ru le of Civil Procedure 37(b) motion for a default judgment, in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.-2- Following careful de novo review, seeRouse v. Benson , 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 1999), we conclude that the distri ct court properly granted summary judgment, and we also find no abuse of discretion in the court’s de nial of Warren’s motion for a default judgment, see Crump v. Versa Prods., Inc. , 400 F.3d 1104, 1110 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review for denial of Ru le 37 motion for sanctions). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. However, we modify the dismissal of FDCF to be with prejudice. SeeMonroe v. Ark. State Univ. , 495 F.3d 591, 594 (8 th Cir. 2007) (Eleventh Amendment bars claims against st ate agencies for any kind of relief); Tex. Cmty. Bank, N.A. v. Mo. Dep’t of So c. Servs., Div. of Med. Servs. , 232 F.3d 942, 943 (8th Cir. 2000) (where Eleventh Amendmen t barred suit, state agency was entitled to dismissal with prejudice).

______________________________
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

George J. Malasek, the chief executive officer of ViaStar Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of complying with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350) and may not be relied upon by anyone for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaims any undertaking to update such certifications
except as required by law.


Date: May 20, 2003


/s/ George J. Malasek
------------------------------------
George J. Malasek,
Chief Executive Officer


===============================================================================
Jahi Amadi HASANATI, Appellant, v. Tony ANDERSON, Warden of Hamilton Correctional Institution, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2001-5

             ------------------------------------------------------



      The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2001-5 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
            Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture
            Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
            the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer during the period
            from the closing date until December 31, 2002, and of performance
            under this Indenture has been made under the supervision of the
            undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
            review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants in
            all material respects under this Indenture throughout the period
            from the closing date until December 31, 2002. No default in the
            compliance of any such condition or covenant has occurred or is
            continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
            performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions of the
            Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made during such
            period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such
            default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if any, to remedy each
            such default and (iii) the current status of each such default:
            NONE.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 28th day of March, 2003.

                                               By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
                                               USA, National Association,
                                               as Administrator




                                               By:  /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                                    ----------------------------
                                               Name: Patricia M. Garvey
                                               Title: Vice President
Timothy LEE, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Likelihood testing of seismicity-based rate forecasts of induced earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas      

      May 5, 2016    

Likelihood testing of induced earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas has identified the parameters that optimize the forecasting ability of smoothed seismicity models and quantified the recent temporal stability of the spatial seismicity patterns. Use of the most recent 1-year period of earthquake data and use of 10–20-km smoothing distances produced the greatest likelihood. The likelihood that the locations of January–June 2015 earthquakes were consistent with optimized forecasts decayed with increasing elapsed time between the catalogs used for model development and testing. Likelihood tests with two additional sets of earthquakes from 2014 exhibit a strong sensitivity of the rate of decay to the smoothing distance. Marked reductions in likelihood are caused by the nonstationarity of the induced earthquake locations. Our results indicate a multiple-fold benefit from smoothed seismicity models in developing short-term earthquake rate forecasts for induced earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, relative to the use of seismic source zones.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Morgan P Moschetti, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

mmoschetti@usgs.gov

303-273-8464

## Related Content

#### Morgan P Moschetti, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

mmoschetti@usgs.gov

303-273-8464

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - kansas
                  -  Oklahoma

View All **
Isaiah D. KELLY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Miguel A. SORDO, Appellant, v. CARIB SALES, LLC /AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA OF FLORIDA and Technology Insurance, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
March 5, 2002

Arthur Andersen LLP
711 Louisiana Street,
Suite 1300
Houston, Texas 77002

For the seven months ended July 31, 2001 (on August 1, 2001, GE Capital Loan Services Inc. (GECLS) was merged into GEMSA Loan Services, L.P.), GECLS' servicing of multi-family and commercial mortgage loans has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. GECLS's Fidelity Bond policy provides coverage of up to $25,000,000 and GECLS's Errors and Omissions policy provides coverage of up to $25,000,000 as of July 31, 2001. For other errors and omission liabilities GECLS was self-insured for risks of errors and omissions in the performance of its commercial mortgage loan servicing business by General Electric Capital Corporation, its indirect corporate parent as of July 31, 2001.

Joseph Beggins, Chief Executive Officer
MY COSMETIC SURGERY, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Michael FRIDMAN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2525

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(16)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(349)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(16)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(14)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(115)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(92)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(20)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(27)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149220(2)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(8)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

B-roll        March 19, 2006        Shatter Ring on PKK Lava Tube (March 20-22, 2006)

B-roll        October 15, 2006        East Lae'apuki Shatter Ring (October 16, 2006)
Order entered October 9, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00964
- CR DONALD HALL, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F12
- 59024
- J 

### O RDER
The Court GRANTS court reporter Kelly Bryant’s October 4, 2013 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We ORDER Ms. Bryant to file the reporter’s record by NOVEMBER 1, 2013

.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission to court reporter Kelly Bryant, kellycsrtx@gmail.com , and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
William SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5269 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5269

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to criminalize knowingly 
 destroying, without the written consent of each progenitor, a living 
human embryo created through the process of in vitro fertilization, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2016

 Mr. Mooney of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to criminalize knowingly 
 destroying, without the written consent of each progenitor, a living 
human embryo created through the process of in vitro fertilization, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection for Progeny Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF LIVING HUMAN EMBRYOS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 90A of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1842. Protection of living human embryos
    ``(a) Offense.--Whoever, in or affecting interstate or foreign 
commerce, knowingly destroys a living human embryo that was created 
through the process of in vitro fertilization and that was destroyed 
without the written consent of each progenitor of such embryo shall be 
fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
    ``(b) Exception for Progenitor.--A progenitor of the embryo that is 
destroyed may not be prosecuted under this section.
    ``(c) Exception for Implantation.--A person may not be prosecuted 
under this section if the destruction of the embryo occurred during or 
after an attempt to implant such embryo.
    ``(d) Progenitor.--The term `progenitor' means any individual who 
provides an egg or a sperm cell from which an embryo is created.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 90A of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:

``Sec. 1842. Protection of living human embryos.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 1 year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Clevon Lamar GHENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-577

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.