alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Clayton MARCUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Duck Creek Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-246116) on Form S-8 of Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated November 3, 2020, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. as of August 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity/redeemable partners’ interest and partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2020, and the related notes, which report appears in the August 31, 2020 annual report on Form 10-K of Duck Creek Technologies, Inc.

Our report refers to the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) as of September 1, 2019.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

November 3, 2020
Case 22-11636-AJC    Doc 17    Filed 03/14/22    Page 1 of 1
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00397-CR

Samuel Gene Hill Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

424th District Court of Burnet County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 44782

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 16, 2017
SUNNY HILLS ALF OF SEBRING, INC., d/b/a Sunny Hills of Sebring, Appellant, v. Richard J. IKE, Jr., as next friend of Richard J. Ike, Sr., Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-162

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Hencile DORSEY Sr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40202]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36714; File No. SR-NSCC-95-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing 
Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Enabling Members 
Settling Mutual Fund Transactions in Same Day Funds to Settle Through a 
Settling Bank

Correction

    In notice document 96-793 beginning on page 1807, in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 23, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 1806, in the first column, before the FR document line, the 
signature line was omitted and should have appeared as follows:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Daniel SOLOMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

48742 

Vol. 72, No. 164 

Friday, August 24, 2007 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Parts 232, 239, 270, and 274 

[Release Nos. 33–8823; IC–27884; File 

Number S7–05–07] 

RIN 3235–AJ59 

Extension of Interactive Data Voluntary 

Reporting Program on the Edgar 

System To Include Mutual Fund Risk/ 

Return Summary Information 

Correction 

In rule document E7–13738 beginning 

on page 39290 in the issue of Tuesday, 

July 17, 2007, make the following 

corrections: 

1. On page 39291, in the third 

column, in the last paragraph, in the 

eighth line, ‘‘Form N 1A’’ should read 

‘‘Form N–1A’’. 

2. On page 39293, in the first column, 

in the last paragraph, in the sixth line, 

‘‘Form N 1A’’ should read ‘‘Form N– 

1A’’. 

3. On page 39293, in the third 

column, in the first full paragraph, in 

the tenth line, ‘‘Form N 1A’’ should read 

‘‘Form N–1A’’. 

§ 232.401 [Corrected] 

4. On page 39299, in the second 

column, in § 232.401(a), in the eleventh 

line, ‘‘Form N 1A’’ should read ‘‘Form 

N–1A’’. 

5. On the same page, in the same 

column, in § 232.401(b)(1)(iv), in the 

third and fourth lines, ‘‘Form N 1A’’ 

should read ‘‘Form N–1A’’. 

PART 274 [Corrected] 

6. On page 39300, in the third 

column, in amendatory instruction 8, in 

the second line, ‘‘Form N 1A’’ should 

read ‘‘Form N–1A’’. 

[FR Doc. Z7–13738 Filed 8–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 301 

[TD 9344] 

1545–BG24 

Change to Office to Which Notices of 

Nonjudical Sale and Requests for 

Return of Wrongfully Levied Property 

Must Be Sent 

Correction 

In rule document E7–14053 beginning 

on page 39737 in the issue of Friday, 

July 20, 2007, make the following 

correction: 

§ 301.7425-3T [Corrected] 

On page 39740, in the first column, in 

§ 301.7425–3T(c), in the first line, ‘‘(c) 

Sale of perishable goodS’’, should read 

‘‘(c) Sale of perishable good’’. 

[FR Doc. Z7–14053 Filed 8–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

[TD 9349] 

1545–BF01 

Employee Benefits – Cafeteria Plans 

Correction 

In rule document E7–14823 appearing 

on page 41891 in the issue of 

Wednesday, August 1, 2007, make the 

following correction: 

On page 41891, in the second column, 

under the SUMMARY heading, in the sixth 

line ‘‘the ≤’’ should read ‘‘the ’’. 

[FR Doc. Z7–14823 Filed 8–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES2
D.G., Father of D.L., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1049

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 15, 2018

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Children's Legal Services, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

D.G. appeals the order terminating his parental rights to D.L. We affirm. The record supports the trial court's findings that the Department of Children and Families ("DCF") proved, by clear and convincing evidence, a ground for termination pursuant to section 39.806(1)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2017).1 Because DCF was required to prove only one statutory ground for termination, we do not need to address whether the trial court correctly relied on other grounds for termination.2*See* § 39.802(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; *S.D. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs.* , 80 So.3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

1

Section 39.806(1)(d)(3) provides that grounds for termination of parental rights may be established where the court determines by clear and convincing evidence "that continuing the parental relationship with the incarcerated parent would be harmful to the child and, for this reason, that termination of parental rights of an incarcerated parent is in the best interest of the child."

2

We recognize that DCF conceded that some of the statutory grounds relied upon by the trial court for termination were not supported by the evidence.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water in the Great Basin region; Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming      

      January 1, 1974    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

The Great Basin Region is defined to include the drainage of the Great Basin physiographic section (Fennman, 1931) in Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. In October 1966, the President’s Water Resources Council requested that a comprehensive framework study be made in the Great Basin Region under the leadership of the Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee. The study, which included evaluation of the water resources of the region and guidelines for future study and development, was completed June 30, 1971. Results of the study received limited distribution.

The purpose of this atlas is to make available to the public the hydrologic data (including a general appraisal) that were compiled for the comprehensive framework study. Most of the work was done by a water-resources work group consisting of members from several Federal and State agencies under the chairmanship of Thomas E. Eakin of the U.S. Geological Survey. This atlas contains some data not included in the framework study.

The data presented herein are reconnaissance in nature and should be used with discretion. The maps are highly generalized and are intended only to illustrate the regional distribution of the supply and general chemical quality of the water. Sources of more detailed information on the hydrology of specific parts of the Great Basin region are listed in the selected references.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Great Basin Region
                  - Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(19)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(28)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - (-)virginia(1)
              - washington(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 26, 2018        National Liaison Committee Meeting: Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)
EX PARTE Zendarius Ziqae WHITE

1160693 (CR-15-1493)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
John THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3190

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellant, v. Andrew Joseph GREENWELL a/k/a Andrew J. Greenwell, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

Melisa Manganelli, of the Law Offices of Mandel, Manganelli & Leider, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellant.

Richard J. Mockler, of Stay In My Home, P.A., St. Petersburg, and Latasha C. Scott, of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Appellee's Concession of Error, we reverse the summary final judgment and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
svra-ex42_362.htm



 

Exhibit 4.2

AMENDMENT TO Warrant to Purchase COMMON Stock

This Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of June 26, 2017, by and between SVB FINANCIAL GROUP (“Holder”) and SAVARA INC. a Delaware corporation (“Company”).

RECITALS

Company has issued for the benefit of Silicon Valley Bank (“Bank”) that certain Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated April 28, 2017 (as amended from time to time, the “Warrant”).  Bank has assigned the Warrant to Holder.  Holder and Company now desire to amend the Warrant in accordance with the terms of this Amendment.

NOW, THEREFORE, Holder and Company agree as follows:

1.The Number of Shares of Common Stock for which the Warrant is exercisable is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

   “Number of Shares of Common Stock:  12,362”

2.Unless otherwise defined, all initially capitalized terms in this Amendment shall be as defined in the Warrant.  The Warrant, as amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its respective terms and hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects. 

3.This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.

[Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the first date above written.

 


	
 
	
SAVARA INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ David L. Lowrance
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
David L. Lowrance
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Title:
	
CFO
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
SVB FINANCIAL GROUP
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Igor DaCruz
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
Igor DaCruz
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Title:
	
Vice President
	
 




 

[Signature Page to Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME WALDEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:95-cr-00063-JRS)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 20, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Walden, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United

States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, David John Novak, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying

his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his

claims in abeyance. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Walden, No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS

(E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5408 

To provide for the treatment and extension of temporary financing of shorttime compensation programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2016 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CICILLINE, and Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the treatment and extension of temporary 

financing of short-time compensation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Layoff Prevention Ex5 tension Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY FINANCING OF SHORT7 TIME COMPENSATION PAYMENTS IN STATES 

8 WITH PROGRAMS IN LAW. 

9 (a) EXTENSION.— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5408 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 

2 2162 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Cre3 ation Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is amend4 ed— 

5 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘3 

6 years’’ and inserting ‘‘5 years’’; and 

7 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

8 (i) in the heading, by striking 

9 ‘‘THREE-YEAR’’ and inserting ‘‘FIVE10 YEAR’’; and 

11 (ii) by striking ‘‘156 weeks’’ and in12 serting ‘‘260 weeks’’. 

13 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

14 by paragraph (1) shall take effect as if included in 

15 the enactment of such section 2162. 

16 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 3306(v)(6) of the 

18 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3306) is 

19 amended by inserting ‘‘or the Workforce Innovation 

20 and Opportunity Act’’ after ‘‘1998’’. 

21 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

22 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the day that 

23 is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 

24 Act. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5408 IH

1 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING AN AP2 PLICATION FOR GRANTS FOR SHORT-TIME 

3 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS. 

4 (a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 2164 

5 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 

6 2012 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is amended by striking ‘‘De7 cember 31, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2016’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact10 ment of such section 2164. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021445EN.01021601.xml

| 29.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/216 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/216

---

P9_TA(2020)0341

Conclusion of the EU-Japan Civil Aviation Safety Agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and Japan (09292/2020 — C9-0205/2020 — 2019/0275(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 445/29)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (09292/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (09292/2020),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and Japan (15260/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and Japan (15260/2019),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0205/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0205/2020),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0239/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0239/2020),

| 1. | Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Japan. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Molecular Imaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Paul J. Crowe, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Dennis M. Mulroy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/ PAUL J. CROWE                                             
|                                                              
|Paul J. Crowe, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: February 17, 2004



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ DENNIS M. MULROY                     
|                                         
|Dennis M. Mulroy, Chief Financial Officer



Dated: February 17, 2004



[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Molecular Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Molecular Imaging Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(4)
              - tennessee(1)

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1980        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Collection

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cores

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections