alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket Index

Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan

Proposed Statutes (Rules): Maricopa County Area Statutes 9-500.04, 11-877, 49-457.01, 

49-474.01, 49-474.05, 49-474.06 

(Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0194) 

April 12, 2013

A. Rulemaking Documents:

1. Docket Index, Proposed Statutes (Rules): Maricopa County Area Statutes 9-

500.04, 11-877, 49-457.01, 49-474.01, 49-474.05, 49-474.06 (Docket No. EPAR09-OAR-2013-0194), April 12, 2013.

2. Air Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, “Technical Support

Document Proposed Statutes 49-457.01 and 11-877,” March 20, 2013.

3. Air Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, “Technical Support

Document Proposed Statutes 9-500.04, 49-474.01, 49-474.05, and 49-474.06,”

March 20, 2013.

B. SIP Submittals:

1. ADEQ Submittal Letter, May 25, 2012.

2. EPA Completeness Letter, July 20, 2012.

3. ADEQ, Final Arizona State implementation Plan, 2012 Five Percent Plan for PM-10 

for the Pinal County Township 1 North, Range 8 East Nonattainment Area, May 25, 

2012.

4. MAG 2012 Five Percent Plan for PM-10 for the Maricopa County Nonattainment 

Area, May 2012.

5. MAG 2012 Five Percent Plan for PM-10 for the Maricopa County Nonattainment 

Area and Appendices, May 2012.

6. MAG 2012 Five Percent Plan for PM-10 for the Maricopa County Nonattainment 

Area, Appendices Volume 1, May 2012.

7. MAG 2012 Five Percent Plan for PM-10 for the Maricopa County Nonattainment 

Area, Appendices Volume 2, May 2012.

__

C. EPA Guidance Documents and Federal Register Notices:

1. “Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,” (a.k.a.,

Bluebook) EPA OAQPS, May 25, 1988.

2. “Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,”

(a.k.a., Little Bluebook), EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001.

3. “State Implementation Plans, General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I

of the Clean Air Amendments of 1990,” 57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992.

4. State Implementation Plans for Serious PM10 Nonattainment Areas, and Attainment 

Date Waivers for PM10 Nonattainment Areas Generally; Addendum to the General 
Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 

1990, 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994). 

5. PM10 Guideline Document, EPA 452/R-93-008, April 1993.

6. Fugitive Dust Background Document and Technical Information Document for Best 

Available Control Measures, (September 1992).

D. Other Documents:

1. A Report to the California Legislature on the Potential Health and Environmental 

Impacts of Leaf Blowers, California Air Resources Board, February 2000.

E. Comment Letters:

 None at this time
Pamela M. MIDDLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
6/23/20 3:20PM

B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Danelia A Flores Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 2,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 2,000.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. $ 335.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

June 23, 2020 /s/ Ricardo Corona

Date Ricardo Corona 111333

Signature of Attorney

Corona Law Firm, PA

3899 NW 7 St, Second Floor

Miami, FL 33126

305-266-1150 Fax: 305-266-1151

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-16787-AJC Doc 5 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 1
Keith JEFFRIES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2660

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 72 (Monday, April 14, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-7007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Development and 
Evaluation of a Gas Chromatograph Testing Protocol

Correction

    In notice document E8-7007 appearing on page 18813 in the issue of 
Monday, April 7, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 18813, in the first column, in the second paragraph, in the 
third line, ``ABE Inc.'' should read ``ABB Inc.''.

[FR Doc. Z8-7007 Filed 4-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Gustave J. LABARRE, Jr., et al. v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC and Georgia Gulf Chemical & Vinyls, LLC

NO. 2018-CC-0660

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         338,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,317,690
<PP&E>                                         643,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,246,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          392,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,336
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,593,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,246,332
<SALES>                                        296,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,920
<CGS>                                          232,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,442,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,410,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,411,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,411,935)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 1779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-313]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Meeting and Webinar on Integrated Dynamic Transit Operations; 
Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent 
Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) will host a free 
public meeting and webinar to obtain stakeholder input on concepts, 
opportunities, and needs for the Integrated Dynamic Transit Operations 
(IDTO) operational concept on January 26, 2012 from 1:30-4:30 p.m. and 
January 27, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. (EST) at the Washington 
Marriott Wardman Park, Washington Room, 2660 Woodley Road NW., 
Washington, DC 20008.
    Persons planning to attend any part of the public meeting or 
participate in the three-hour webinar should register by January 19, 
2012 using the following link: http://www.itsa.org/component/forme/?fid=6. For additional questions, please contact Adam Hopps at 
ahopps@itsa.org or (202) 680-0091.
    The IDTO public meeting will bring stakeholders together as part of 
an interactive forum to discuss opportunities, needs, transformative 
goals, and performance measures. Outcomes from this workshop will 
provide an important foundation to the overall vision and an 
operational concept for the IDTO. The first half of the public meeting 
will be delivered via webcast for those participants who are not able 
to participate in person. An electronic feedback form will be made 
available to allow participants to provide additional input. The 
meeting will follow the Transportation Research Board annual meeting.

Background

    The overarching goal of the Transit Connected Vehicle for Mobility 
program is to improve public transportation by increasing transit 
productivity, efficiency, and accessibility; mitigating congestion in 
an integrated transportation environment; and providing travelers 
better transportation information and transit services. Transit-
oriented Connected Vehicle for Mobility applications support dynamic 
system operations and management, enable a convenient and quality 
travel experience, and provide an information-rich environment to meet 
the needs of travelers and system operators across all modes.

    Issued in Washington, DC on the 4th day of January 2012.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2012-313 Filed 1-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT GARY LEWIS MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. DANIEL L. STIENEKE ; MACK JARVIS; MICHAEL E. BUMGARNER; J. HARDY; No. 99-7165 SERGEANT BISSETT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINDSEY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JACKSON; SERGEANT ADAMS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HILL; HAROLD SMALLS, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-845-5-F) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 28, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Gary Lewis Miller, Appellant Pro Se.Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Gary L. Miller appeals the district court's orders: (1) denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and a preliminary injunction for the return of certain items of personal property, (2) denying his petitionfor a writ of mandamus seeking review of the decision of North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services not to represent him on his 42 U.S.C.A.§ 1983 (West Supp. 1999) action, and (3) seeking discovery materials. We affirm in part and dismiss in part. Although a final order has not been entered in this action, this Court has jurisdiction to review the denial of Miller's motion for a preliminary injunction. See28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1994). We have reviewed the record and find that the claim contained in his motion for a preliminary injunction is beyond the scope of this action and that Miller's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies bars recovery on this claim. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court because Miller has failed to show any likeli hood of su ccess on the merits of this claim. See Hoechst Diafoil Co. v. Nan Ya Plastics Corp. , 174 F.3d 411, 417 (4th Cir. 1999). Because the district court has not entered a final order in this action, the court's orders denying his two petitions for mandamus are nonappealable, interlocutory orders. We therefore dismiss the appeal of the district court's denial of these petitions for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); see also Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Similarly, the denial of Miller's discovery motion is not immediately appealable. See id. We deny Miller's motions to stay the district court proceedings pending interlocutory review and for the production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
2tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART 3
Case 20-18418-PDR Doc 2 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-18418-PDR Doc 2 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4884 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to place an annual cap on 

support provided through the Lifeline program of the Federal Communications Commission and to provide for certain other requirements relating to such program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to place an 

annual cap on support provided through the Lifeline 

program of the Federal Communications Commission 

and to provide for certain other requirements relating 

to such program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Controlling the Un5 checked and Reckless Ballooning of Lifeline Act of 2016’’ 

6 or the ‘‘CURB Lifeline Act of 2016’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4884 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE LIFE2 LINE PROGRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part II of title II of the Commu4 nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 251 et seq.) is amended 

5 by inserting after section 254 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 254A. CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE 

7 LIFELINE PROGRAM. 

8 ‘‘(a) ANNUAL CAP ON SUPPORT.—The total amount 

9 of support that may be provided through the Lifeline pro10 gram of the Commission in any calendar year may not 

11 exceed $1,500,000,000. 

12 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON SUBSIDY OF DEVICES.—Sup13 port provided through the Lifeline program of the Com14 mission may not be applied to any amount charged to a 

15 consumer for the sale, lease, or other provision of a mobile 

16 telephone or similar device. 

17 ‘‘(c) PROHIBITION ON VOICE-ONLY MOBILE SERV18 ICE.—Support provided through the Lifeline program of 

19 the Commission may not be applied to mobile service if 

20 the service offering is limited to voice communications 

21 service.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—Section 254A of the Com23 munications Act of 1934, as added by subsection (a), shall 

24 apply as follows: 

25 (1) Subsection (a) of such section shall apply 

26 beginning with calendar year 2017. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4884 IH

1 (2) Subsection (b) of such section shall apply 

2 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

3 (3) Subsection (c) of such section shall apply 

4 beginning on the date that is 2 years after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-10.1.50



 Exhibit 10.1.50 

THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING NOTATION IN THIS EXHIBIT INDICATES THAT THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION: [***] 
 Statement
of Work #4 
 To the 2Ku In-Flight Connectivity Services Agreement 

Between 
 Delta Air Lines,
Inc. and Gogo LLC 
 Dated April 1, 2015 

Statement of Work Date: March 13th, 2017 

This Statement of Work #4 (the “Statement of Work”) is entered into as of the date set forth above (the “Effective
Date”), and is pursuant to the 2Ku In-Flight Connectivity Services Agreement between Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) and Gogo LLC (“Contractor”) dated April 1,
2015 (as amended, the “Agreement”), where the Statement of Work is subject to and incorporates by reference the provisions of the Agreement. Capitalized terms used without definition in this Statement of Work have the meanings
assigned to them in the Agreement. To the extent there is any contradiction, inconsistency or ambiguity between the terms of this Statement of Work and the Agreement, this Statement of Work will govern. 

WHEREAS, Delta and Contractor are parties to the Agreement under which Contractor provides installation of certain equipment and provision of services
related to Contractor’s 2Ku Connectivity Services; 
 WHEREAS, Delta and Contractor desire to provide for 2Ku Connectivity Services on certain
Fleet Type A/C; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and covenants contained herein, Delta and Contractor agree as follows:

 1. Addition of Existing Fleet Type A/C. Pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Agreement, the A/C listed in the chart below shall be added to the
Agreement as Existing Fleet Type A/C: 
 [***] 

2. Effectiveness. This Statement of Work #4 will be effective as of the Effective Date. 







 Signature Page Follows 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Statement of Work #4 to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date. 

 

									
	Delta:	 		 	Contractor:
			
	DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware corporation	 		 	 GOGO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

					
	 By:
	 	/s/ Jerry Rose	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Michael
Small



									
	Name: Jerry Rose	 		 	 Name: Michael Small

	Title: General Manager, SCM	 		 	 Title: President and CEO

					
	 Date:
	 	 	 		 	Date:	 	 May 4, 2017



  
 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00554

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

J. B. DANIEL

, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR

- 12

- 002

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 29, 2014.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        February 23, 2023        Volcanic explosion penetrates both upper atmosphere and upper crust around the globe

Infographics        March 19, 2024        PFAS Fate Transport Diagram

Science Snippet        September 18, 2023        Can oceans store more CO2 to help with climate change?

Infographics        October 1, 2023        #ClimateCryptids: Bigfoot

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - Spanish version

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - English Version
Order filed December 8, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-01022-CR

____________

SOSTENES JOEY ADAME, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 81875-CR

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the originals of State's Exhibit 11; 

State's Exhibit 12; and Defendant's Exhibit 2.
The clerk of the 239th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the originals of State's Exhibit 11; State's Exhibit 12; and Defendant's 

Exhibit 2, on or before December 22, 2020. The Clerk of this court is directed to 

receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of 

this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the 

originals to the clerk of the 239th District Court.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.