alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Total Luxury Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandy J. Masselli, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.
                                             /s/ SANDY J. MASSELLI, JR.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.

August15, 2005
^ J^ffrrf^f. OcBARTMENTOF 

.'^NSPORWION 

:^U OPERATIONS 

September 2, 2010 " ' ^'^ ""^ A 10 I b 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7"" Street, SW., Room PL 401 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

SUBJECT: PETITION FOR EXEMPTION - FAR 121.434(c)(1)(ii) 

Reference: Docket Number FAA-2001-8722 

Dear Sir/Madam; 

In accordance with the provisions of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 

11.61, SkyWest Airlines, petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 7689D 

(Docket No. FAA-2001-8722). If granted this exemption would provide relief to 

the extent necessary to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in 

place of an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while 

that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a 

takeoff and landing when completing initial or upgrade training as specified in 

FAR 121.424. Additionally the proposed Exemption extension, if granted, would 

allow the substitution only at the discretion of the certificate holder and only when 

an FAA Inspector Is not immediately available, subject to certain conditions and 

limitations. 

Exemption 7689D will expire on January 31, 2011, unless superseded or 

amended. Justification for extending this exemption was stated in the original 

exemption, dated January 3, 2001. SkyWest Airlines continues to expand into its 

operation and foresees continued growth for an extended period of time. 

The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and safety, 

which warranted the original grant of exemption, continue to exist. The 

Exemption has been used since first granted with no known compromise of 

safety. 

444 South River Road 

St. George, Utah 84790 

435.634.3000 

www.skywest.corn 
Petition for Exemption 

Page 2 

Extending this Exemption will not adversely affect safety, but will simply 

provide an equivalent alternative to an administrative aspect of the stated 

regulations. Extending this exemption will have no adverse impact on the 

interests of the aircraft owners or on governmental agencies. 

As the renewal of this exemption is not precedent setting, SkyWest 

Airlines requests that publication of our petition in the Federal Register be waived 

In accordance with Section 11.87(b). The renewal of this exemption is not a 

controversial issue since the reasons and conditions for implementation are 

identical to Exemption 7689 original issue. 

Robin L. Wall 

Director Flight Operations Training 

SkyWest Airlines
## Breadcrumb

-  Educational Resources 

#           What Do Maps Show?      

      By Educational Resources

-  Home 
-  Ecosystems 
-  Geography 
-  Geology 
-  Global Change 
-  Natural Hazards 
-  Oceans and Coasts 
-  Solar System 
-  Water Resources 
-  USGS Data in Schools 
-  Adventures in STEM 
-  Multimedia 
-  Connect 

Please see below for lessons, activities, and resources for map education.

                            - Activities
                            - Lessons
                            - Poster  (8.51 MB)
                            - Road Map  (948 KB)
                            - Shaded Relief Map  (912 KB)
                            - Topographic Relief Map  (1.08 MB)
                            - Teacher Background  (28 KB)
                            - Evaluation  (12 KB)
J.M.P., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D17-3494 1D17-3496

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - (-)news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

newsletter        January 10, 2022      The Monitor newsletter - Vol. 5 | Issue Winter 2022

newsletter        October 5, 2023      Latest in Landsat - October 2023 - Vol. 2 | Issue 10

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption

Satellite imagery        December 4, 2015        Titan Cassini VIMS
Anthony P. NEWSOME, Sr., Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and East Coast Waffles, Inc., Appellees.

No. 1D17-3726

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 7051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-70223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ANM-16]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Ogden, UT

Correction

    In rule document 96-850 beginning on page 1706 in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 23, 1996, make the following corrections:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 1707, in the 1st column, in Sec. 71.1:
    1. In the 13th line, ``C-'' should read ``V-''.
    2. Lines 7 and 8 from the bottom should read ``101, southeast along 
V-101 to V-288, west along V-288 to V-484,''.
    3. In the 2d line from the bottom, ``areas'' should read ``area''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
AFS-13-204-E 

March 12, 2013 

 Exemption No. 10311A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0337 

Mr. Danny Olmstead 

Vice President of Flight Operations 

Key Air, LLC 

3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201 

Oxford, CT 06478 

Dear Mr. Olmstead: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 5, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Key Air, LLC (Key Air) for an extension of Exemption No. 10311. That 

exemption from § 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Key 

Air to make instrument flight rules (IFR) takeoffs with less than 1 mile visibility and 

approaches and landings with less than 1⁄2 mile visibility at military and foreign airports. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Key Air. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10311 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 
2 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The operator must have and comply with Operations Specification C079. 

 

2. Airports at which the operator intends to use the provisions of this exemption must 

have approach procedures that were developed in accordance with U.S. Terminal 

Instrument Procedures or International Civil Aviation Organization Procedures for 

Air Navigation Services-Aircraft Operations criteria. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Michel J. Zenkovich 

Deputy Director, Flight 

 Standards Service 

Enclosure
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 44 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-138190) and Amendment No. 577 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 7, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 4, 2017
NE GENERAL., 

OF TEXAS 

Hon. James A. Bethea. M. D. 

Executive Director 

Opinion No. S- 102 

Board for Texas State Hospitals 

and Special Schools 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Dr. Bethea: 

Re: Authority of the Board 

for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools 

to pay the cost of curbs 

and gutters on city streets 

adjacent to State institutions. 

You have requested an opinion of this office concerning the validity of the payment of costs for curbs and gutters on 

city streets adjacent to State institutions under your supervision. 

Articles 3174 and 3174b, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, vest 

the general control, management and direction of the affairs, property and business of the institutions named in Section 3 of Article 

3174b in the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Special Schools. 

Rights, privileges, powers and duties incident to this authority including building, design and construction are also conferred on the 

Board. 

It cannot be questioned that the paving of streets adjacent to State property with companion curbing and gutters is an improvement to that property. It is equally as certain that the Board’s 

authority cited above includes the power to so improve the property 

entrusted to its care if it so desires. Participation in the joint plan 

with the City of Austin, whereby the Board supplies the cost of installation of curbs and gutters, is within the Board’s discretion. 

Of course, authority to make the expenditure is subject 

to appropriation for that purpose. 

With only minor exceptions, each appropriation for the 

institutions under the Board for Texas State Hospitals and Spec~ial 

Schools includes an item for “other operating expenses” and an item 

for “capital outlay.” (Article II, Chapter 31, Acts 53rd Legislature, 

1953, General Appropriation Bill.) Section 3 of that same Article II, 
Hon. James A. Bethea, M. D., page 2 (S-102) 

in defining the various line item terms refers to the current classification of accounts by the Comptroller of Public Accounts. Included in both the quoted items above is code group number 5130 

which covers among other things “cost of sidewalks, streets and 

roads.” 

A balance in either the “other operating expenses” or 

the “capital outlay” item could be utilized for the proposed expenditure. 

SUMMARY 

.The Board for State Hospitals and Special Schools 

has authority to contribute the cost of curbs and gutters 

as a part of a paving project on city streets adjacent to 

institutions under the Board’s jurisdiction. 

APPROVED Yours very truly, 

Willis E. Gresham 

Public Affairs Division 

JOHN BEN SHEPPERD 

Attorney General 

John Atchison 

Reviewer 

Robert S. Trotti 

First Assistant 

John Ben Shepperd 

Attorney General 

JFJ:da
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

42489

Vol. 63, No. 152

Friday, August 7, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

Correction

In notice document 98–19919,

beginning on page 40106, in the issue of

Monday, July 27, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 40107, in the first column, in

the tenth line, ‘‘129,265’’ should read

‘‘19,265’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[FRL-6126-8]

Identification of Additional Ozone

Areas Attaining the 1-Hour Standard

and to Which the 1-Hour Standard is

No Longer Applicable

Correction

In rule document 98–19388,

beginning on page 39432, in the issue of

Wednesday, July 22, 1998, make the

following correction:

§ 81.318 [Corrected]

On page 39436, in the Kentucky–

Ozone table, in the second column titled

‘‘Designation’’, under Type, ‘‘1

hr.std.N.A.22’’ should read ‘‘1

hr.std.N.A.2’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
        


AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered effective the 16th day of May, 2017, between CNO Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and Edward J. Bonach (“Executive”).


Recitals


A.The Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 18, 2014 (the “Agreement”).


B.On May 16, 2017, the Company announced that Executive will be retiring on December 31, 2017 and the Company’s Board of Directors agreed to extend the term of the Agreement through December 31, 2017.


C.The Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to extend its Term (as defined in the Agreement) through the date of Executive’s retirement. 
    
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged:


		
	1.
	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended solely to change the ending date of the Term from October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017.  All other provisions of Section 2 of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.  




		
	2.
	All provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.


CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Susan L. Menzel

	 
	Susan L. Menzel, Executive Vice

	 
	President, Human Resources






	
		
	 
	/s/ Edward J. Bonach

	 
	Edward J. Bonach
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-38607; File No. SR-CBOE-97-10]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
Change by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Relating to 
Minimum Sizes for Closing Transactions, Exercises, and Responses to 
Requests for Quotes in FLEX Equity Options

Correction

    In notice document 97-12886 beginning on page 27083 in the issue of 
Friday, May 16, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 27084, in the second column, the authorizing signature 
should read:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - (-)new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Project        November 28, 2018        Climate Change, Hydrologic Responses and Impacts on Carbon Cycling as Inferred by Changes in Fluvial Dissolved Organic Carbon Fluxes
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,Steven R. McNinch, Chief Executive Officer and I, Scott Foote, PrincipalFinancial Officer of Western Plains Energy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-Kof Western Plains Energy, L.L.C.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; and

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presentedin this annual report.

 
| Date:  December 28, 2009 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| /s/  Steven R. McNinch        |   |
| Steven  R. McNinch            |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer      |   |
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| /s/  Scott Foote              |   |
| Scott  Foote                  |   |
| Principal  Financial Officer  |   |

 

----
CGFD42 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 31, 2022

Robert A Mark

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 22−12648−RAM

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Cassandra White

aka Cassandra Renee White

4250 NW 196 Street

Miami Gardens, FL 33055

SSN: xxx−xx−1254

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO MAKE

PRE−CONFIRMATION PLAN PAYMENTS AND FOR

FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE SECTION 341 MEETING OF CREDITORS

This matter is before the court ex parte pursuant to Local Rule 3070−1(C) for failure of the debtor to remit

to the trustee pre−confirmation plan payments, and pursuant to Local Rule 1017−2(B)(2) for failure of the

debtor to appear at the § 341 Meeting of Creditors.

It is ORDERED that:

Page 1 of 2

Case 22-12648-RAM Doc 22 Filed 05/31/22 Page 1 of 2
 1. This case is dismissed.

 2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

 3. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

 4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United

States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the balance of the

filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the trustee shall be applied to this

balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Local

Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by the court. The court will not entertain a motion for

reconsideration of this order unless all unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

 5. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with the

requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

 6. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept for filing

any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior order of the court or if

the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments and filing fees remain due

from any previous case filed by the debtor.

# # # 

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

Page 2 of 2

Case 22-12648-RAM Doc 22 Filed 05/31/22 Page 2 of 2