alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(16)
              - 2023(5)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileKaj Williams, Ph.D.

staff profileSarah Y. Murphy, Ph.D.

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat

staff profileJustin R. Nichols, Ph.D.

staff profileBryan A. Killingsworth, Ph.D.

staff profileRyan McCammon

staff profileRichard L Reynolds

staff profileBrian T. Lamb, Ph.D.

staff profilePatrick Wurster

staff profileJay Alder

staff profileJohn Warner, PhD

staff profileMartha A Scholl

staff profileTimothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

staff profileJason A. Addison, Ph.D.

staff profileMarith Reheis

staff profileAmanda Garcia

staff profileThomas G Huntington, Ph.D.

staff profileAaron M. Jubb, Ph.D.

staff profileRoger Patrick Denlinger, Ph.D.

staff profileSydney S Foks

staff profileKimberly Casey, Ph.D.

staff profileBarry P Baldigo

staff profileKarl B Haase, Ph.D.

staff profileDavid P Krabbenhoft
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 70374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-22974]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 70374]]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56809; File No. SR-Amex-2007-116]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 
1 and 2 Thereto, To Harmonize the Annual Listing Fees for All Exchange 
Traded Funds

Correction

    In notice document E7-22974 beginning on page 66203 in the issue of 
Tuesday, November 27, 2007, make the following correction:
    On page 66205, in the second column, in the third paragraph, in the 
last line, ``December 17, 2007'' should read ``December 18, 2007''.

[FR Doc. Z7-22974 Filed 12-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 95247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board hereby gives notice of the scheduling of 
a teleconference of the National Science Board/National Science 
Foundation Commission on Merit Review (MRX) for the transaction of 
National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: The MRX meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, December 3, 
2024, from 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Eastern.

PLACE: This meeting will be held at the National Science Foundation, 
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda is: Commission Chair's opening 
remarks about the agenda; Discussion of Final Recommendations and 
Guidance, Vote for Approval of Final Recommendations and Guidance; and 
Commission Chair's closing remarks.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, [email protected], 703/292-7000. Meeting information and 
updates may be found at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Ann E. Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-28266 Filed 11-27-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title 

^ ^- ^1^ ^ Tioi^ml 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s); 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

/ \ The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

\ 

/ ( This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

^\ic(Mti^J2^l%udx^f^ 1 

Signature 

^^^p6P^^Y A^^'^'^*^^ (fcne^rctj (ioUy^S^l /^^ 

Title/Office 

Date 

/ / // ^ // / 

05/26/2011
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(4)
              - (-)tennessee(1)

## By Year

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections
STATE EX REL. Kian TATE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0948

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. State ex rel. Tate v. State, 16-0003 (La. 4/13/17), 215 So.3d 667.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

ACCESSION LETTER 
  

	From:	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 24 AS 


	  	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 25 AS 


	  	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 26 AS 


	  	Knutsen NYK Offshore Tankers AS 


	  	KNOT Offshore Partners LP 


	  	KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS 

  

	To:	DNB Bank ASA as Agent 

  

	Dated:	1 June 2017 

 Dear Sirs 

KNOT Shuttle Tankers 24 AS, KNOT Shuttle Tankers 25 AS and KNOT Shuttle Tankers 26 AS – USD 353,000,000 Facilities Agreement dated
27 April 2015 (the “Agreement”) 
  

	1.	We refer to the Agreement. This is an Accession Letter. Terms defined in the Agreement have the same meaning in this Accession Letter unless given a different meaning in this Accession Letter. 


 

	2.	KNOT Offshore Partners LP (“KNOP”) and KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS (“KNOT ST”) agree to become Guarantors with respect to all amounts outstanding under the Post-Delivery Tranche B-1 and to be bound by
the terms of the Agreement as Guarantor pursuant to Clause 28.2 (KNOP and KNOT ST as replacement Guarantors) of the Agreement. 

  

	3.	KNOP’s and KNOT ST’s administrative details are as follows: 

  

	 	Address:	2 Queen’s Cross 


	 	  	Aberdeen 


	 	  	Aberdeenshire AB15 4YB 


	 	  	United Kingdom 

 Fax no.: +44 (0) 1224 624891 

Attention: CFO/CEO 
  

	4.	We confirm that the Repeating Representations are made by each of KNOT Shuttle Tankers 24 AS, KNOT Shuttle Tankers 25 AS, KNOT Shuttle Tankers 26 AS, Knutsen NYK Offshore Tankers AS, KNOP and KNOT ST on the date of this
Accession Letter and that all Repeating Representations are true in all material respects on that date. 

  

	5.	KNOP and KNOT ST both confirm having been notified by the Agent that accession to the Agreement as guarantors will imply that they become guarantors for existing debt, that there is no Event of Default and that in
addition to the guarantees from KNOP and KNOT ST, the Outstanding Indebtedness will be secured by the following Security Documents (all as defined in the Agreement): 


 

	 	(a)	the Pre-Delivery Assignment Agreements; 

  

	 	(b)	the Mortgages; 









	 	(c)	the Post-Delivery Assignment Agreements; 

  

	 	(d)	the Factoring Agreements; 

  

	 	(e)	the Account Pledges; 

  

	 	(f)	the Share Pledges. 

  

	6.	This Accession Letter is governed by Norwegian law and KNOP has appointed KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS as its process agents in respect of this Accession Letter and the other Finance Documents. 


 

	
	Yours faithfully
	
	/s/ Trygve Seglem
	authorised signatory for
	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 24 AS


  

	
	/s/ Trygve Seglem
	authorised signatory for
	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 25 AS


  

	
	/s/ Trygve Seglem
	authorised signatory for
	KNOT Shuttle Tankers 26 AS


  

	
	/s/ Trygve Seglem
	authorised signatory for
	Knutsen NYK Offshore Tankers AS


  

	
	/s/ John Costain
	authorised signatory for
	KNOT Offshore Partners LP


  

	
	/s/ Trygve Seglem
	authorised signatory for
	KNOT Shuttle Tankers AS
Walter Lee WRIGHT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D18-0797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

35212 

Vol. 73, No. 120 

Friday, June 20, 2008 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service 

7 CFR Part 305 

[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0084] 

RIN 0579–AC57 

Consolidation of the Fruit Fly 

Regulations 

Correction 

In rule document E8–12858 beginning 

on page 32431 in the issue of Monday, 

June 9, 2008, make the following 

correction: 

§ 305.2 [Corrected] 

On page 32439, in § 305.2(h)(2)(ii), the 

table is corrected to appear as follows: 

Location Commodity Pest Treatment 

schedule 

Areas in the United States under Federal 

quarantine for the listed pest. 

.................................................................. .................................................................. . 

* * * * * * * 

Any fruit or article listed in § 301.32–2(a) 

of this chapter.

All fruit fly species of the Family 

Tephritidae.

IR. 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. Z8–12858 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRCX
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Vikram Jog, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Fluidigm Corporation; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 27, 2017By:/s/ Vikram JogVikram JogChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7641** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JEFFREY RIOS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:10

- cr - 00017

- PJM

- 1; 8:11

- cv - 02238

- PJM )

Submitted : February 21, 2013 Decided: March 11, 2013

Before KING and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part ; affirmed in part by un published per curiam opinion
. Jeffrey Rios, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Kenneth Ake, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Gr eenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Rios seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion , which the district court construed as a motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)
. Rios insi sts on appeal that his motion , in which he challenges the effectiveness of counsel and seeks to have his sentence vacated for resentencing, was filed pursuant to § 2255; therefore, we review it as such. An order denying relief under § 2255 is not appeala ble unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) ( 200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.3 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rios has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in part . Although we do not agree wit h the district court’s construction of the entirety of Rios’ motion as one for reduction of sentence under § 3582(c)(2), we do a gree with the court’s reasoning in denying that relief. Therefore, to the extent that Rios’ pleading sought relief available pu rsuant to § 3582(c)(2), we affirm the denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief on the reasoning of the district court. Rios v. United States , Nos. 8:10

- c r - 00017

- PJM

- 1; 8:11

- cv - 02238

- PJM (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le gal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART ; AFFIRMED IN PART
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95359-95360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28192]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0171]

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: 
Application for Individualized Tutorial Assistance

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 
this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the collection of 
information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature 
of the information collection and its expected cost and burden, and it 
includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
by clicking on the following link www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, 
select ``Currently under Review--Open for Public Comments'', then 
search the list for the information collection by Title or ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0171.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  VA PRA information: 202-461-8900, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: Application for Individualized Tutorial Assistance, VA Form 
22-1990t.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0171, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRASearch.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: The VA uses the information collected to determine

[[Page 95360]]

eligibility and payment for tutorial assistance. Without the 
information on this form, VA would be unable to determine the 
applicant's eligibility for tutorial assistance.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published at 89 FR 79366, September 27, 2024.
    Affected Public: Educational Institutions.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 51 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Once annually.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 102.
    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Dorothy Glasgow,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, (Alt.) Office of Enterprise and Integration, 
Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-28192 Filed 11-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - multimedia_image(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(3)

## By Location

              - (-)american samoa(3)
              - california(2)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - puerto rico(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        July 27, 2023        July 2023—Topography and bathymetry of the Manuʻa Islands, American Samoa

Charts or Graphs        September 1, 2022        Topography, bathymetry, and volcano monitoring network of the Manu‘a Islands, American Samoa

Charts or Graphs        September 1, 2022        Topography and bathymetry of the Manu‘a Islands, American Samoa
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Coastal breach in St. Augustine, Florida caused by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Breach on Portsmouth Island in North Carolina caused by Dorian

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Part of the Outer Banks in North Carolina eroded by Hurricane Dorian

Before/After Image        February 10, 2023        Boulder, Colorado

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        GOES-16 and Landsat 8