alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.2


SERVICENOW, INC.
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of August 8, 2017 by and between ServiceNow, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael P. Scarpelli (“Executive”) and reinstates and amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of May 12, 2011 by and between Executive and Company (as amended on August 15, 2014, the “Agreement”).
In consideration of the mutual promises, agreements and provisions contained in this Amendment, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Reinstatement. The Agreement is hereby reinstated in its entirety as amended by this Agreement.




		
	2.
	Term. The first sentence of Section 1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


“1.2    Term. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall continue until August 15, 2020, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 4 herein (the “Term”).”


		
	3.
	Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date first set forth above upon the execution hereof by the Company and Executive.




		
	4.
	Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, taken together, shall be deemed one and the same document.




		
	5.
	Governing Law. The internal substantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of California shall govern this Amendment.




		
	6.
	Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.




[Signature Page Follows]













































The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.




SERVICENOW, INC.




/s/ John J. Donahoe                    
John J. Donahoe
President and Chief Executive Officer




EXECUTIVE




/s/ Michael P. Scarpelli                    
Michael P. Scarpelli
# C_2021445EN.01021701.xml

| 29.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/217 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/217

---

P9_TA(2020)0342

EC-Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement: extension of the Protocol ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2020 (11260/20 — C9-0372/2020 — 2020/0274(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 445/30)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (11260/20), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (11260/20),

| — | having regard to the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2020 (11315/20), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2020 (11315/20),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0372/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0372/2020),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Budgets, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Budgets,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0244/2020), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0244/2020),

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
Pedro DEL SOL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5320 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To restrict the inclusion of social security account numbers 

on documents sent by mail by the Social Security Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 5320 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Must 

3 Avert Identity Loss (MAIL) Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUM5 BERS IN DOCUMENTS SENT BY MAIL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(c)(2)(C) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(xiv)(I) The Commissioner of Social Security shall 

10 ensure that no document sent by mail by the Social Secu11 rity Administration includes a complete social security ac12 count number unless the Commissioner determines that 

13 inclusion of such complete number is necessary. 

14 ‘‘(II) Not later than 30 days after the date of the 

15 enactment of this clause and not later than each of March 

16 31 and September 30 of each of the first 6 years following 

17 the year in which such date of enactment occurs, the Com18 missioner of Social Security shall submit to the Committee 

19 on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and 

20 the Committee on Finance of the Senate a report on the 

21 implementation of subclause (I). Such report shall in22 clude— 

23 ‘‘(aa) the title and identification number of 

24 each document used by the Social Security Adminis25 tration during the previous year on which is printed 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 5320 RFS

1 an individual’s complete social security account num2 ber; 

3 ‘‘(bb) the most recent date on which each such 

4 document was updated; and 

5 ‘‘(cc) the projected date on which complete so6 cial security account numbers will be removed from 

7 each such document, or if the Commissioner deter8 mines that inclusion of such complete number is nec9 essary, the rationale for such determination.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Commissioner of Social 

11 Security shall implement the amendments made under 

12 subsection (a) as soon as practicable after the date of the 

13 enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 2 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00285

- CR

JAMIE FINCH , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FO

- 10

- 20420

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On November 22, 2010, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, a ppellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of hindering apprehension and the trial court placed her on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years

. Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt , alleging appellant had violated certain conditions of her community supervision

. On February 11, 2013, also pursuant to an agreement , appellant entered a plea of true to the allegations in the2

Sta te’s motion and waived her right to appeal. T he trial court adjudicated appellant guilty of the offense and , i n accordance with the agreement, sentenced appellant to confinement for fifteen (15) months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a $734 fine . Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
Negotiated waivers of the right to appeal are valid. See Monreal v. State , 99 S.W.3d 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The record reflects the State gave consideration for appellant’ s waiver . In exchange for a plea of true to the allegation s in the motion to adjudicate guilt, appellant was convicted of the lesser included offense of attempted hindering apprehension and sentenced to fifteen
months in the State Jail Division. Accordingly, the wav er is valid. See Ex parte Broadway , 301 S.W.3d 694, 697

- 98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009)

. Cf Washington v.
State , 363 S.W.3d 589 , 590 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (waiver was not valid because the record did not confirm the State gave any consideration for defendant’s waiver)

. The record on appeal contains the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified the defendan t has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and McCally

. Do Not Publish

C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6606

DOUGLAS ANDREW WILEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 639-MJG) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Andrew Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wiley v. Smith , No. CA-97-639-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
William MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ex10-1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


Via email 


June 13, 2017


 


Mr. Samuel Dortch


2800 Gap Road


Batesville, Arkansas 72501


 


 


Re:     Retirement from FutureFuel 


 


 


 


Sam, as further discussed, below confirms our understanding on your retirement.


 


	 	
			●

				
			You will retire at the end of 2017.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			Beginning January 1, 2018, you will be a consultant on an as needed basis at a rate of $100 per hour. For 2018, you will receive minimum aggregate consultancy fees of $100,000.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			After 2018, consulting remains on an as needed basis at a rate of $100 per hour.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			No consultancy fee will be paid for your travel time, however, FutureFuel will reimburse your travel expenses for related work. Reimbursement for such travel expenses will apply even if you relocate your primary residence from Batesville as long as your relocation is within the contiguous United States.

			



 


	 	
			●

				
			If you decide to move from your current primary residence in Batesville before the end of 2017 and have listed it on the market for sale for at least six consecutive months prior to July 1, 2018 without success of sale, FutureFuel will purchase your current primary residence in Batesville for fair market value. If fair market value cannot be agreed between you and FutureFuel, fair market value will be determined by the average of the prices of two appraisals (one to be conducted on behalf of you and another on behalf of FutureFuel).

			



 


 


/s/ Paul A. Novelly


Paul A. Novelly
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(26)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(4)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - hawaii(39)
              - idaho(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - north carolina(8)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Animated GIF        October 16, 2020        Wave animation
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Year-class formation of upper St. Lawrence River northern pike      

      January 1, 2007    

Variables associated with year-class formation in upper St. Lawrence River northern pike Esox lucius were examined to explore population trends. A partial least-squares (PLS) regression model (PLS 1) was used to relate a year-class strength index (YCSI; 1974-1997) to explanatory variables associated with spawning and nursery areas (seasonal water level and temperature and their variability, number of ice days, and last day of ice presence). A second model (PLS 2) incorporated four additional ecological variables: potential predators (abundance of double-crested cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus and yellow perch Perca flavescens), female northern pike biomass (as a measure of stock-recruitment effects), and total phosphorus (productivity). Trends in adult northern pike catch revealed a decline (1981-2005), and year-class strength was positively related to catch per unit effort (CPUE; R2 = 0.58). The YCSI exceeded the 23-year mean in only 2 of the last 10 years. Cyclic patterns in the YCSI time series (along with strong year-classes every 4-6 years) were apparent, as was a dampening effect of amplitude beginning around 1990. The PLS 1 model explained over 50% of variation in both explanatory variables and the dependent variable, YCSI first-order moving-average residuals. Variables retained (N = 10; Wold's statistic ??? 0.8) included negative YCSI associations with high summer water levels, high variability in spring and fall water levels, and variability in fall water temperature. The YCSI exhibited positive associations with high spring, summer, and fall water temperature, variability in spring temperature, and high winter and spring water level. The PLS 2 model led to positive YCSI associations with phosphorus and yellow perch CPUE and a negative correlation with double-crested cormorant abundance. Environmental variables (water level and temperature) are hypothesized to regulate northern pike YCSI cycles, and dampening in YCSI magnitude may be related to a combination of factors, including wetland habitat changes, reduced nutrient loading, and increased predation by double-crested cormorants. ?? Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2007.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### H Brian Underwood, Ph.D.

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

hbunderw@usgs.gov

607-753-9391

## Related Content

#### H Brian Underwood, Ph.D.

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

hbunderw@usgs.gov

607-753-9391

### Contacts

#### H Brian Underwood, Ph.D.

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

hbunderw@usgs.gov

607-753-9391
TITAN FLORIDA, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The ESTATE OF Jean LINDOR, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
WEBBER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Michael BYNES, a/k/a Mike Bynes, Sr., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(5)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(16)
              - (-)2023(5)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileKaj Williams, Ph.D.

staff profileBryan A. Killingsworth, Ph.D.

staff profilePatrick Wurster

staff profileMartha A Scholl

staff profileKimberly Casey, Ph.D.
Rickey Carlton BARKER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-775

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.17



Sunoco Partners LLC

Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet

for 2009



Directors who are employees of Sunoco Partners LLC or its affiliates receive
no additional compensation for service on the general partners board of directors or any committees of the board. The table below summarizes the 2009 compensation program for independent directors of Sunoco Partners LLC.



2009 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY



|                                         |  |                   |  |                   |  |                            
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Component                                |  | Amount($)         |  | Medium of Payment |  | Timing of Payment          
|Annual Retainer                          |  | 41,000 per year   |  | Restricted Units  |  | $10,250 credited quarterly1
|                                         |  | 41,000 per year   |  | Cash              |  | $10,250 paid quarterly     
|Board Meeting Fee                        |  | 1,500 per meeting |  | Cash              |  | Paid quarterly             
|Committee Meeting Fee                    |  | 1,000 per meeting |  | Cash              |  | Paid quarterly             
|Compensation Committee Chair Retainer    |  | 3,500 per year    |  | Cash              |  | $ 875 paid quarterly       
|Audit/Conflicts Committee Chair Retainer |  | 8,000 per year    |  | Cash              |  | $2,000 paid quarterly      



Note to table:



|(1) | The fair market value of each quarterly payment of Restricted Units is calculated as of the payment date. The portion of the annual retainer paid in the form of Restricted Units is
required to be deferred, and is credited to each independent directors account in the Sunoco Partners LLC Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In addition to the foregoing, each independent director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of
the board of directors or committees.
Order entered February 18, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00113-CV

IN RE CATHERINE HAYNES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-12828

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE