alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bruce ZIPPER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave Climates

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(3)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        May 21, 2021        Reconstructing paleohydrology in the northwest Great Basin since the last deglaciation using Paisley Caves fish remains (Oregon, U.S.A.)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Time‐lapse imaging of saline‐tracer transport in fractured rock using difference‐attenuation radar tomography      

      January 1, 2003    

Accurate characterization of fractured‐rock aquifer heterogeneity remains one of the most challenging and important problems in groundwater hydrology. We demonstrate a promising strategy to identify preferential flow paths in fractured rock using a combination of geophysical monitoring and conventional hydrogeologic tests. Cross‐well difference‐attenuation ground‐penetrating radar was used to monitor saline‐tracer migration in an experiment at the U.S. Geological Survey Fractured Rock Hydrology Research Site in Grafton County, New Hampshire. Radar data sets were collected every 10 min in three adjoining planes for 5 hours during each of 12 tracer tests. An innovative inversion method accounts for data acquisition times and temporal changes in attenuation during data collection. The inverse algorithm minimizes a combination of two functions. The first is the sum of weighted squared data residuals. Second is a measure of solution complexity based on an a priori space‐time covariance function, subject to constraints that limit radar‐attenuation changes to regions of the tomograms traversed by high difference‐attenuation ray paths. The time series of tomograms indicate relative tracer concentrations and tracer arrival times in the image planes; from these we infer the presence and location of a preferential flow path within a previously identified zone of transmissive fractures. These results provide new insights into solute channeling and the nature of aquifer heterogeneity at the site.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Frederick D. Day-Lewis (Former Employee)          

##### Research Hydrologist, Hydrogeophysics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

#### John W Lane, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Senior Advisor for Water/International

International Programs

##### Senior Advisor for Water/International

Water Resources Mission Area

jwlane@usgs.gov

860-487-7402

## Related Content

####             Frederick D. Day-Lewis (Former Employee)          

##### Research Hydrologist, Hydrogeophysics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

#### John W Lane, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Senior Advisor for Water/International

International Programs

##### Senior Advisor for Water/International

Water Resources Mission Area

jwlane@usgs.gov

860-487-7402

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Fractured Rock Hydrology Research Site
                  - New Hampshire

View All **
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Mediacom Broadband LLC (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rocco
B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. March 26, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B.
Commisso     Chief
Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer
 94
J-S53006-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

: PENNSYLVANIA 

 Appellee : 

: 

 v. : 

: 

JERMAINE SAMUEL, : 

: 

 Appellant : No. 1546 WDA 2013 

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence April 12, 2013,

Court of Common Pleas, Blair County, 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-07-CR-0000667-2012 

and CP-07-CR-0002674-2011 

BEFORE: DONOHUE, OLSON and PLATT*, JJ. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY DONOHUE, J.: FILED AUGUST 22, 2014 

 Jermaine Samuel (“Samuel”) appeals from the judgment of sentence 

entered following his convictions of numerous counts of possession with 

intent to deliver, criminal use of a communication facility, dealing in unlawful 

proceeds and corrupt organizations.1

 On April 12, 2013, Samuel was 

sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 461⁄2 to 103 years of incarceration. 

On April 22, 2013, Samuel filed a timely post-sentence motion. The trial 

court did not rule on Samuel’s post-sentence motion within 120 days of the 

date it was filed, and so it was effectively denied by operation of law. See

 

1

 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30); 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 7512(a), 5111, 911(b)(3). 
J-S53006-14

- 2 - 

Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(B)(3)(a). The docket reveals, however, that no order was 

ever entered denying Samuel’s post-sentence motion.2

 

“A direct appeal in a criminal proceeding lies from the judgment of 

sentence.” Commonwealth v. Patterson, 940 A.2d 493, 497 (Pa. Super. 

2007). When timely post-sentence motions have been filed, the judgment 

of sentence is made final when an order is entered disposing of the postsentence motions. Commonwealth v. Kuykendall, 2 A.3d 559, 560 n.1 

(Pa. Super. 2010). Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court for 

the entry of an order nunc pro tunc denying Samuel’s post-sentence motion 

as a matter of law pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(B)(3)(a) within 10 days of 

the date of this judgment order. The trial court shall then transmit the order 

and updated docket sheet reflecting its entry to this Court so that we may 

proceed with the appeal. 

Case remanded. Jurisdiction retained. 

 

2

 Samuel avers in his notice of appeal that an order was entered on August 

20, 2013 denying his post-sentence motions as a matter of law. There is no 

notation of such an order on the docket. Further, we have conducted a 

thorough review of the record and have found no such order contained 

therein.
EXHIBIT 10.5 


AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE
AGREEMENT


This Amendment
to Stock Purchase Agreement (the “First Amendment”) is made as of this 26th day of July 2017 by and among Capaciti
Networks, Inc., a Texas corporation (“Capaciti”), Competitive Companies, Inc. (“Seller”), a Nevada corporation,
and Wytec International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), with respect to the following facts:


RECITALS


		A.	The Company, Seller, and Capaciti have entered into that certain
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 17, 2016 (the “SPA”), pursuant to which the Company purchased 100% of the
total issued and outstanding stock of Capaciti in exchange for 609,603 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Purchase
Price”).



		B.	The SPA erroneously identified the Purchase Price as 609,604 shares
of the Company’s common stock instead of 609,603 shares of the Company’s common stock.



		C.	The parties desire to correct the Purchase Price in the SPA.



		D.	The terms used in this First Amendment will have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.



NOW,
THEREFORE, for one dollar and other good and valuable consideration,
THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:


		1.	   Amendment.







The Purchase
Price is 609,603 shares of the Company’s common stock. All references in the SPA to 609,604 are hereby amended and restated
to be 609,603.


		2.	Effect of First Amendment.



The Agreement
will remain in full force and effect except as specifically modified by this First Amendment. In the event of any conflict between
the First Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this First Amendment will govern.


		3.	Counterparts.



This First
Amendment may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which counterparts will be deemed to be an original
and such counterparts will constitute but one and the same instrument.


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, this First Amendment is executed as of the date first above written.





	CAPACITI: CAPACITI NETWORKS, INC.	 	SELLER: COMPETITIVE COMPANIES, INC.
	 	 	 
	By:	 	By:
	William H. Gray, President	 	William H. Gray, President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	COMPANY: WYTEC INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	William H. Gray, President
**Exhibit 23.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 333-139538 on Form S-4 of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2007, relating to the financial statements of CBOT Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB StatementsNo. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R))*and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CBOT Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 27, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  | August 10, 2005                   |   | By: | /s/ Steven C. Ackmann |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-----|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Steven  C. Ackmann,                    |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael J. Zwebner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on 10-QSB of Universal Communication
Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

   a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
       to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
       its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
       entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
       is being prepared;

   b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
       the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
       end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
       evaluation; and

   c)  Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
       internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
       registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
       is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
       control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
       operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
       affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
       financial information; and

   b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       controls.

DATE:  August 19, 2005

/S/ MICHAEL J. ZWEBNER
----------------------
MICHAEL J. ZWEBNER
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8110

LONNIE D. MORRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON MEDICAL 

DEPARTMENT; E. BORHAM, Health Care (Gilmer - FCI) 

Administrative; ELLEN MACE-LEIBSON, D.O. Clinical Director; 

JAMES A. NOLTE, FNP; GILMER - F.C.I.; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE; 

ANDREA HALL, RN; UNKNOWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, 

District Judge. (3:12-cv-00073-GMG-DJJ)

Submitted: April 17, 2013 Decided: May 1, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie D. Morris, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lonnie D. Morris appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part 

and dismissing his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims 

Act. We have reviewed the record and agree that Morris failed 

to comply with the requirements set forth in W. Va. Code Ann. 

§ 55-7B-6 (LexisNexis 2008). Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Morris v. United States, 

No. 3:12-cv-00073-GMG-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 5, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of OneBeacon U.S. Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Michael Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 16, 2011

 
|     | /s/   T. MICHAEL MILLER                 |
|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|     | T.   Michael Miller                     |
| * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: 

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No.: 21-13797-PDR 

 Chapter 11 

 Debtor. 

____________________________________/ 

MELAND BUDWICK, P.A.'S 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the law firm of Meland Budwick, P.A. files its 

appearance as counsel for interested party, Liberty Power Corporation (the “LPC”) in the abovecaptioned case. Pursuant to § 1109(b) and all other applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code 

and Bankruptcy Rules 2002 and 9010, LPC requests that all notices and other papers given are 

required to be served in this case be given to and served upon the following: 

Michael S. Budwick, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 938777 

mbudwick@melandbudwick.com

Daniel N. Gonzalez, Esquire 

Fla. Bar No. 592749 

dgonzalez@melandbudwick.com 

MELAND BUDWICK, P.A. 

3200 Southeast Financial Center 

200 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 358-6363 

Facsimile: (305) 358-1221 

Please take further notice that, pursuant to §§ 2002 and 9010 and all other applicable 

provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the foregoing request includes not only the notices and 

papers referred to in the rules specified above, but also includes, without limitation, notices and 

other papers as to any application, complaint, demand, hearing, motion, petition, pleading or 

Case 21-13797-PDR Doc 17 Filed 04/22/21 Page 1 of 3
   

2

request, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, and whether transmitted or 

conveyed by mail, delivery, telephone, telex, or otherwise filed with regard to the abovereferenced proceeding. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on April 

, 2021, via the Court's Notice of Electronic Filing upon the Registered Users listed on the 

attached Exhibit 1. 

s/Daniel N. Gonzalez 

Michael S. Budwick, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 938777 

mbudwick@melandbudwick.com

Daniel N. Gonzalez, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 592749 

dgonzalez@melandbudwick.com

MELAND BUDWICK, P.A. 

3200 Southeast Financial Center 

200 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 358-6363 

Facsimile: (305) 358-1221 

Attorneys for Liberty Power Corporation 

Case 21-13797-PDR Doc 17 Filed 04/22/21 Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT 1

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service 

for this case. 

 Scott Andron sandron@broward.org, swulfekuhle@broward.org 

 Paul J. Battista pbattista@gjb-law.com, gjbecf@gjb-law.com;chopkins@gjblaw.com;jzamora@gjb-law.com;gjbecf@ecf.courtdrive.com;vlambdin@gjb-law.com 

 Heather L Harmon HHarmon@gjb-law.com, gjbecf@gjblaw.com;ecastellanos@gjb-law.com;gjbecf@ecf.courtdrive.com;jzamora@gjb-law.com 

 Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

Case 21-13797-PDR Doc 17 Filed 04/22/21 Page 3 of 3
Kinn Shawn WEBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4989

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Terrell S. WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Edward BEARDEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4456

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN 10-Q, BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                        25
<INVENTORY>                                      5,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,036
<PP&E>                                           1,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                     998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,505
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,317
<SALES>                                          5,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,556
<CGS>                                            2,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    767
<INCOME-TAX>                                       314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                767
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       767
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>