alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Triggering and modulation of geyser eruptions in Yellowstone National Park by earthquakes, earth tides, and weather      

      April 1, 2014    

We analyze intervals between eruptions (IBEs) data acquired between 2001 and 2011 at Daisy and Old Faithful geysers in Yellowstone National Park. We focus our statistical analysis on the response of these geysers to stress perturbations from within the solid earth (earthquakes and earth tides) and from weather (air pressure and temperature, precipitation, and wind). We conclude that (1) the IBEs of these geysers are insensitive to periodic stresses induced by solid earth tides and barometric pressure variations; (2) Daisy (pool geyser) IBEs lengthen by evaporation and heat loss in response to large wind storms and cold air; and (3) Old Faithful (cone geyser) IBEs are not modulated by air temperature and pressure variations, wind, and precipitation, suggesting that the subsurface water column is decoupled from the atmosphere. Dynamic stress changes of 0.1−0.2 MPa resulting from the 2002 M-7.9 Denali, Alaska, earthquake surface waves caused a statistically significant shortening of Daisy geyser's IBEs. Stresses induced by other large global earthquakes during the study period were at least an order of magnitude smaller. In contrast, dynamic stresses of >0.5 MPa from three large regional earthquakes in 1959, 1975, and 1983 caused lengthening of Old Faithful's IBEs. We infer that most subannual geyser IBE variability is dominated by internal processes and interaction with other geysers. The results of this study provide quantitative bounds on the sensitivity of hydrothermal systems to external stress perturbations and have implications for studying the triggering and modulation of volcanic eruptions by external forces.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Shaul Hurwitz

##### Research Hydrologist

California Volcano Observatory

shaulh@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Shaul Hurwitz

##### Research Hydrologist

California Volcano Observatory

shaulh@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Yellowstone National Park
                  - Wyoming

View All **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7850

CHRISTORA RAY CLARK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus K. J. BASSETT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-04-350) Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 30, 2005 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christora Ray Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Christora Ray Clark seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Clark has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Raijuahn Omarious ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2167

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6182

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FURMAN LATTIMORE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-94-472, CA-98-3816-6-20)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Furman Lattimore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Furman Lattimore, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lattimore, Nos.

CR-94-472; CA-98-3816-6-20 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Jason BRUBACHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1289 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-43-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

No US registered 

engines 0.0 $ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The removal of 

the disks is expected to take place during normal maintenance actions on the engine. Pratt & 

Whitney will be replacing the disks with CFM manufactured parts.
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: This AD will not require any regulator action that is likely to result in a rule.

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: The estimated to cost to implement the actions mandated by this AD are less than 

$100 million or more per year. Furthermore the actions mandated by this AD do not result in a 

major increase in costs or prices for individual industrie. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: This AD will not affect US operators.

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: This AD will not affect US operators.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 95842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28260]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-136, OMB Control No. 3235-0157]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Form N-8F

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget a request for extension of the previously 
approved collection of information discussed below.
    Form N-8F (17 CFR 274.218) is the form prescribed for use by 
registered investment companies in certain circumstances to request 
orders of the Commission declaring that the registration of that 
investment company cease to be in effect. The form requests information 
about: (i) the investment company's identity, (ii) the investment 
company's distributions, (iii) the investment company's assets and 
liabilities, (iv) the events leading to the request to deregister, and 
(v) the conclusion of the investment company's business. The 
information is needed by the Commission to determine whether an order 
of deregistration is appropriate.
    The Form takes approximately 5.2 hours on average to complete. It 
is estimated that approximately 101 investment companies file Form N-8F 
annually, so the total annual burden for the form is estimated to be 
approximately 525 hours. The estimate of average burden hours is made 
solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act and is not 
derived from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study. 
Commission staff continues to believe that there is no cost burden for 
completing and filing Form N-8F.
    The collection of information on Form N-8F is not mandatory. The 
information provided on Form N-8F is not kept confidential. An agency 
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, 
a collection of information unless it displays a currently-valid OMB 
control number.
    The 30-day public comment period for this information collection 
request opens on December 4, 2024 and closes on January 3, 2025. The 
public may view the full information request and submit comments at 
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=202408-3235-028 or 
email comments to [email protected].

    Dated: November 26, 2024.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-28260 Filed 12-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5378 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5378

To prohibit the National Science Foundation from conducting a study of 
   the history of standards and standardization in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 2016

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the National Science Foundation from conducting a study of 
   the history of standards and standardization in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    The National Science Foundation shall not use or provide to others 
funds for conducting a study of the history of standards and 
standardization in the United States, including standards relating to 
uniform systems of weights, measures, timekeeping, electrical units, 
and product specifications governing everything from screw threads to 
paper sizes.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - (-)documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - (-)other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2021(1)

file  MOU between USGS and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

About        February 5, 2024        California's History of Large Storms & Floods

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

MOUs        March 22, 2016        MOU - Integrated and Adaptive Water Resources Management

About        May 21, 2020        History of the NWQP and Its Programs

About        May 21, 2020        What We Do

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Handout, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Fill-in-the-blank, 8.5x11-inch PDF)

Reference Materials        October 13, 2022        The Water Cycle (Poster, PDF)

Policy and Directives        November 14, 2019        Final PEIs with Appendicies

Reference Materials        December 11, 2017        All water on Earth in a sphere, placed over a "dry" globe

Technical Memos        April 7, 1997        TM97-04S Collection, processing, and analysis of ground-water samples for tritium/helium-3 dating;
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6574
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME WALDEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00063-JRS) Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 20, 2006 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Walden, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jerome Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his claims in abeyan ce. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walden , No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
01/07/2010 12:08 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS 12001/002 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIA I ION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matte r of: APOLLO A & HS COMPANY 

Docket No. CP08AL0001 

FDMS No. FAA-2008-0783 

Served: December 17, 2009 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin issued a written initial decision in 

tliis case on November 4, 2009- In his decision, the ALJ found that Respondent Apollo A 

& HS Company (Apollo) had committed a number of violations of the hazardous 

materials regulations (49 CF.R. Parts 171 - 180). The ALJ assessed Apollo a civil 

penalty of $9,000. 

On November 12, 2009, Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

filed a timely notice of appeal from the written initial decision. Under 14 CF.R. 

§§ 13.233(c) and 13.211(e), ihe FAA's appeal brief is due no later than December 29, 

2009. 

By tiling dated December 14, 2009, counsel for the FAA requests an exten.sion nf 

time in which to perfect her appeal by filing an appeal brief. Counsel states thai she ha.s 

had no response to her letter sent to Apollo by facsimile on November 24, 2009, a.sking if 

Apollo would oppose her request for an extension of time. She also states that before she 

received the case file on November 23, 2009, she had scheduled annual leave to visit her 

family in Vermont from (December 21, 2009, through January 3, 2010. 
01/07/201 0 12:0 8 FAX 202493514 2 FAA -s- DMS 0002/002 

The unopposed request for an extension of time in which to file the appeal brief is 

granted under 14 CF.R. § 13.233(c)(1). The FAA's appeal brief is due to be filed on 

February 1,2010. 

L KANDOLFH BABBfl T 

ADMINISTRATOR 

Federal Aviation Administration 

VICKI STLEEMON' 

Manager, Adjudication Branch 

Issued under authority delegated to ihc ChicrCounseJ and the Assistant Chief Coun.scl for 

I.itigalion by Memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 CF.R.. 

§ 13.202 (see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and rcdelegated by the Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
Abraham BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4175

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 133 (Friday, July 11, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 37335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10711]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 37335]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-603-000]


Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of Application

Correction

    In document 97-17321, beginning on page 35796, in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 2, 1997, the Docket No. should read as set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5252 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5252

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2016

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of 
  Entry located at 1400 Lower Island Road in Tornillo, Texas, as the 
                   ``Marcelino Serna Port of Entry''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARCELINO SERNA PORT OF ENTRY.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Customs and Border Protection 
Port of Entry located at 1400 Lower Island Road in Tornillo, Texas, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Marcelino Serna Port of Entry''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Marcelino Serna Port of Entry''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Pamela L. KAUFMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Ryan L. FIELDS and Connors Jet Age Fuel, Inc., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.