alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service
[INS No. 1884-97]


Expansion of the Direct Mail Program for the Denver, Kansas City, 
Portland, Oregon, and St. Paul District Offices and the Salt Lake City 
and St. Louis Suboffices; Form N-400

Correction

    In notice document 98-366 beginning on page 892, in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 7, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 893, in the first column, under the heading DATES ``This 
notice is effective January 7, 1998 or January 30, 1998'' should read 
``This notice is effective January 30, 1998.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - 24 CFR Part 200
          - [Docket No. FR-5290-P-01]
          - RIN 2502-AI73

### Correction

In proposed rule document E9-24338 beginning on page 52354 in the issue of Friday, October 9, 2009, make the following correction:

§200.54

On page 52356, in §200.54(b), in the third column, in the second line, “where approved by” should read “where approved by the Commissioner in accordance with terms, conditions, and standards established by the Commissioner;”. 

[FR Doc. Z9-24338 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CGFD65 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 12, 2022

Mindy A Mora

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 22−11098−MAM

Chapter: 7

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Robert W. Szostak

aka Bert Szostak

3191 S Dixie Hwy

Apt 515

West Palm Beach, FL 33405

SSN: xxx−xx−3597

ORDER DETERMINING DEBTOR'S

COMPLIANCE WITH FILING REQUIREMENTS OF §521(a)(1)

 Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i), if an individual debtor in a voluntary case under chapter 7 or 13 fails to

file all of the information required under 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) within 45 days after the date of the filing of

the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day after the date of the filing

of the petition.

Page 1 of 2

Case 22-11098-MAM Doc 42 Filed 05/12/22 Page 1 of 2
 The information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) as provided by the debtor* in this case is complete

to the satisfaction of the trustee and no creditor or other party in interest has filed a request for an order of

dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(2) as provided under Local Rule 1017−2(A)(2). Based upon the

trustee's review, the court has determined that the debtor has complied with the information requirements

of 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. This case is not subject to automatic dismissal under 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(1) or (2).

2. If any creditor or other party in interest has any reason to contest the court's finding that the

debtor has filed all information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1), that party shall file an

objection not later than 21 days from the date of the entry of this Order, and serve such

objection on the trustee, the United States Trustee, debtor, and debtor's counsel, if any. The

objection should specifically identify the information and document(s) required by 11 U.S.C.

§521(a)(1) that the debtor has failed to file.

3. Each creditor or other party in interest served with this Order who does not file an objection

within the 21 day deadline set forth above has waived the right to file a motion to dismiss this

bankruptcy case for the debtor's failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

4. Nothing in this Order shall excuse the debtor's duty to cooperate with the United States

Trustee and the trustee assigned to this case, and shall not prevent the United States Trustee

or case trustee from requesting by any authorized means, including, but not limited to motion,

that the debtor supply further information.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

* All references to "debtor" shall include and refer to both of the debtors in a case filed jointly by two

individuals.

Page 2 of 2

Case 22-11098-MAM Doc 42 Filed 05/12/22 Page 2 of 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

63859 

Vol. 71, No. 210 

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

5 CFR Part 630 

RIN 3206–AK72 

Absence and Leave; SES Annual 

Leave 

Correction 

In rule document E6–17389 beginning 

on page 61633 in the issue of Thursday, 

October 19, 2006, make the following 

corrections: 

(1) On page 61633, in the second 

column, in the second paragraph, in the 

last line, ‘‘employee’s grade’’ should 

read ‘‘employee’s grade or pay level.’’. 

(2) On page 61634, in the first 

column, in the 14th line, ‘‘performance 

appose of allowing a’’ should read: 

‘‘performance appraisal system. 

The purpose of allowing a’’ 

[FR Doc. Z6–17389 Filed 10–30–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen Walters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Stephen Walters
-------------------
Stephen Walters
Chief Executive Officer
April 26, 2006
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: CASE NO.: 21-18481-MAM

Chapter 7

NITV LLC 

Debtor

___________________________________/

 EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING EMPLOYMENT OF TRUSTEE'S ATTORNEY

THIS CAUSE came on before the Court upon the Trustee's Application for Employment 

of Michael R. Bakst, Esq., and the law firm of Greenspoon Marder LLP, in this case. (ECF# 8) 

Upon the representations that Michael R. Bakst, Esq., and Greenspoon Marder LLP, hold no 

interest adverse to the estate in the matters upon which they are engaged, that Michael R. Bakst, 

Esq., and Greenspoon Marder, LLP, are disinterested persons as required by U.S.C. §327(a) and 

have disclosed any connections with parties as set forth in FRBP 2014, and that their 

employment is necessary and would be in the best interests of the estate, it is 

ORDERED that the Trustee is authorized to employ Michael R. Bakst, Esq., and the law 

firm of Greenspoon Marder, LLP, as attorney for the Trustee, on a general retainer, pursuant to 

11 U.S.C §327 and 330.

###

Submitted by:

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 1, 2021.

Case 21-18481-MAM Doc 9 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Michael R. Bakst, Trustee

P.O. Box 407

West Palm Beach, FL 33402

Telephone: (561) 838-4539

(Michael R. Bakst, Trustee is directed to serve copies of this order on all interested parties 

and file a certificate of service with the Court)

Case 21-18481-MAM Doc 9 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZANN Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  on  Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert  C.  Simpson,  President  and  Chairman  of the Board of Directors of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:


     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


Dated: September 8, 2005

                                   /s/ Robert C. Simpson
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Robert C. Simpson, President
                                   Chairman of the Board of Directors


<PAGE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Where was the 31 October 1895, Charleston, Missouri Earthquake?      

      October 19, 2019    

We revisit the magnitude and location of the 31 October 1895 Charleston, Missouri earthquake, which is widely regarded to be the last MW6 or greater earthquake in the central United States. Although a recent study (Bakun et al., 2003) concluded that this earthquake was located in southern Illinois, over 100 km north of the traditionally inferred location near Charleston, Missouri, our analysis of exhaustively compiled macroseismic data supports the traditionally inferred location, with a preferred magnitude of MW ≈ 5.8, and preferred range of 5.4 to 6.1. Our preferred magnitude is derived from comparisons with intensity distributions from the 1925 MW = 6.2 Charlevoix, the 1944 MW = 5.8 Massena, and the 1968 MW = 5.3 southern Illinois earthquakes, which we also revisited in this study. Based on the distribution of liquefaction, reports of damage, and early aftershocks, we also explore possible rupture scenarios for the 1895 earthquake. Our preferred scenario involves unilateral rupture to the northeast on a (reactivated) northeast-striking fault (or faults) coinciding with structures associated with the western limb of the Reelfoot Rift, with an epicenter south-southeast of Charleston, Missouri. Our results support the conclusion that, within the Reelfoot Rift, elevated seismic hazard is not restricted to the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ) as conventionally defined but continues into the Charleston region in southeastern Missouri where faults associated with the western edge of the Reelfoot Rift appear favorably oriented for failure in the current stress regime.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

## Related Content

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Charleston
                  - missouri

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Eco-Rx, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31,
1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,687
<PP&E>                                          43,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,919)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          915,804
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,843
<OTHER-SE>                                   (896,409)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,238
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (212,464)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (212,464)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
Lauri MILLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-2620

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Angela Rae HAYDEN v. William B. CASHION and Western Steel, Inc.

1150234

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

TIMOTHY AND DEBRA CLARKE, H/W

 v.

MMG INSURANCE COMPANY AND F.

FREDERICK BREUNINGER & SON

INSURANCE, INC.

PETITION OF: MMG INSURANCE

COMPANY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 588 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         243,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,233
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               967,845
<PP&E>                                       4,161,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 719,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,308,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,627,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,847,000
<COMMON>                                        58,892
<OTHER-SE>                                   (872,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,308,100
<SALES>                                      1,396,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,396,345
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,227,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (655,887)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             513,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,688,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,688,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,688,825)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Records of selected wells and springs, selected drillers' logs of wells, and chemical analyses of ground and surface waters, northern Utah Valley, Utah County, Utah      

      January 1, 1962    

This report is intended to serve two purposes: (1) to make available to the public basic ground-water data useful in planning and studying development of water resources and (2) to supplement an interpretive report that will be published later.

Records were collected during the period 1956-59 by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah State Engineer as a part of the investigation of the ground-water resources of northern Utah Walley in Utah County, Utah. Some earlier data and other information in the tables are from published reports on the ground-water resources of northern Utah Walley. The interpretive material will be published cooperatively by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Utah State Engineer in a companion report by Seymour Subitzky.

This report is most useful in predicting conditions likely to be found in areas that are being considered as well sites. The person considering the new well can spot the proposed site on plate 1 and examine the records of nearby wells as shown on the tables. From tables 1, 2, and h he can note the type of material that yields water to wells in the vicinity; from table 2 he can note (1) the depth and diameter of wells in the vicinity and the yield of some of those wells, and (2) the depth to water or the feet of water pressure in the vicinity; from table 3 and plate 1 he may note the location of springs and the conditions related to the occurrence of these springs; and from tables 5 and 6 he may note the chemical quality of the water from wells and from some surface sources, and the uses of these waters. If the reader decides from his examination that conditions are favorable, he may place an application to drill a well with the State Engineer. If the State Engineer believes unappropriated water is available, the application may be approved after minimum statutory requirements have been satisfied.

The report is also useful when planning large-scale developments of water supply. This and other uses of the report will be helped by use of the interpretive report upon its release.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah Valley
                  - Utah

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: JOSEPH PATRICK ABBOTT CASE NUMBER:21-10227-LMI

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for April 5, 2022 hearing. All amendments and documents for the April 5, 2022 

hearing were due as of March 18, 2022. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

1AP not served 

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 5/10:

Due on or before 5pm on 4/13: 1) COS for 1AP must be filed 21 days prior to confirmation, 2) LF90, 3) bank 

stmts #3174 (10/12-1/12), 4) affidavit of support

**AMENDED PLANS MUST USE NEW PLAN FORM (4/1/22)**

Case 22-10227-LMI Doc 23 Filed 03/24/22 Page 1 of 1