alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - maine(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - (-)rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Center News        June 30, 2022        Drought Conditions Continue in Parts of New England
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10826]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 45289]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 145

[Docket No. 96-070-2]


National Poultry Improvement Plan and Auxilliary Provisions

Correction

    In rule document 97-21902 beginning on page 44067 in the issue of 
Tuesday, August 19, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 145.33 [Corrected]

    On page 44069, in the second column, in Sec. 145.33(j)(1), in the 
sixth line, beginning after the word ``Provided,'' insert the missing 
text: ``That to retain this classification, a minimum of 20''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Suspended sediment and hydrodynamics above mildly sloped long wave ripples      

      July 1, 2004    

We investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of suspended sediment and the associated hydrodynamics over mildly sloped long wave ripples on the inner shelf. These bedforms had wavelengths of approximately 1 m and heights of approximately 5 cm, in a mean water depth of 4 m. The vertical and temporal structures of the suspended sediment concentration (SSC) are consistent with the entrainment of sediment on the offshore flank of the ripple, and rapid vertical mixing at the time of flow reversal, followed by advection onshore by the onshore fluid motion. This work confirms that the mechanism for sediment suspension above low-amplitude, long wave ripples is similar to the vortex formation process expected over steeper vortex ripples. Numerical simulations of the flow using the Dune2d model indicate that a separated rotational flow structure is generated at the flank of the ripple on the seaward side of the ripple crest, near the time of flow reversal. The simulations indicate that only one vortex is formed during each wave period, in agreement with the field observations. This asymmetry is due mainly to the presence of an offshore mean near-bed current of approximately 6 to 8 cm/s. The SSC is calculated by the model and compared to the field observations. A hydraulic bed roughness of 10 to 15 median grain diameters (d50) was used in order to match the model prediction to the observed SSC approximately 1 cm above the seabed (cab). However, the modeled SSC and turbulent kinetic energy were significantly lower than the field observations at elevations exceeding approximately 2 cab.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - U.S. Army Corps of Engineering Field Research Facility
                  - North Carolina

View All **
This notice is in reference to your request of May 15, 2015.

In an e

- mail dated May 15, 2015, Counsel for American Airlines, Inc., requested an extension of time in which to prepare American’s answer in the above

- referenced third

- party complaint to May 22, 2015. The Complainant, Mike Borsetti, indicated that he does not oppose the request.

This office has decided to grant for good cause the requested extension. This notice is issued

under aut hority assigned in 14 CFR 302.405(a).

Note to Dockets : Please place this notice in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2015

- 0087.

Charles E. Smith Senior Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the General Counsel 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Gene Hodges, Chief Executive Officer of Websense,
Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Websense, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the
period covered by the Quarterly Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  |                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Dated: October 28, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ GENE HODGES
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  | Gene Hodges Chief Executive
Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by Websense, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Quarterly Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Websense,
Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 21-21661-RAM    Doc 60    Filed 05/16/22    Page 1 of 2

Case 21-21661-RAM    Doc 60    Filed 05/16/22    Page 2 of 2
AD Economic Evaluation



### Docket No . FAA

- 20 15

- 5807 Directorate ID : 2015

- SW

- 063

- AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS355NP helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 2 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : The proposed actions would correct the fire

- extinguishing connections and would

prevent the fire extinguishing system discharging to the wrong engine compartment, failure of

the fire extinguishing system to control a fire, and subsequent loss of co ntrol of the helicopter.

Costs :

Parts per Helicopter $ 6,367

Labor per Helicopter

( 24 work hours X $85 for

inspection ) $ 2,040

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $8,407

Total US Fleet Cost $16,814

Executive Order 12866 :

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures :

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act :

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : George Schwab
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the quarterly report of Universal Communication Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: February 21, 2006                 By:  /s/ Michael J. Zwebner
                                             ----------------------
                                             Michael J. Zwebner
                                             Chief Executive Officer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00329-CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.J., A JUVENILE

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 418-J-15

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant, A.J., appeals an Order Modifying Disposition signed on August 29, 

2016. 

The docketing statement in this appeal has not been filed, the appellate filing fees 

have not been paid, and the reporter’s record has not been requested. By letters dated 

December 5 and December 6, 2016, the Clerk of this Court warned appellant’s counsel

that 1) the appeal would proceed on the clerk’s record alone if a reporter’s record was not 

requested within 21 days from the date of the letter; and 2) the appeal would be abated 

to the trial court to determine whether appellant is receiving effective assistance of 

counsel if the docketing statement was not filed and the fees were not paid or an affidavit 

of indigence containing the information required to be considered by subsection (m) of 
In the Matter of A.J., a Juvenile Page 2

section 56.01 of the Texas Family Code was not filed within 14 days from the date of the

letter. The time periods in both letters have passed, and the reporter’s record has not 

been requested, the docketing statement has not been filed, and the fees have not been 

paid or an affidavit of indigence has not been filed.

Accordingly, this appeal is abated to the trial court to hold a hearing within 14 

days from the date of this order to determine:

1. Why appellant’s counsel has not complied with the Clerk’s letters dated 

December 5 and December 6, 2016;

2. Whether appellant desires to continue with the appeal;

3. If appellant desires to continue with the appeal, a date certain appellant will 

comply with the terms of the Clerk’s letters dated December 5 and 

December 6, 2016; and

4. Whether appellant is receiving effective assistance of counsel.

If the trial court determines appellant desires to continue with the appeal but is 

not receiving effective assistance of counsel, the court must remove counsel and appoint 

new counsel to represent appellant. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 51.10; 51.101 (West 2014). 

If the trial court determines appellant does not wish to continue with the appeal, 

the court shall require appellant to so state either on the record or in writing and admitted 

into evidence at the abatement hearing. 

The trial court's findings and orders must be provided to the trial court clerk 

within 7 days from the date of the hearing.

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to prepare and file a supplemental clerk's record 

containing the written findings and orders of the trial court in this Court within 14 days 
In the Matter of A.J., a Juvenile Page 3

from the date of the hearing.

Further, the reporter is ORDERED to prepare and file in this Court a record of the 

hearing held within 14 days from the date of the hearing.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed December 28, 2016
James Michael TOMASSO, Appellant, v. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.1
WEX Inc.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan
Effective September 21, 2016
Originally Adopted December 13, 2014


Annual Cash Retainers


The Company shall pay each non-employee board member the following annual cash retainer(s) based upon his or her service. All payments hereunder shall be made in equal quarterly amounts.


	
				
	Annual Chairman Cash Retainer
	$
	87,500
	


	Annual Lead Director Cash Retainer
	$
	65,000
	


	Annual Director Cash Retainer (other than Lead Director)
	$
	50,000
	


	Audit Committee Chair Cash Retainer
	$
	30,000
	


	Compensation Committee Chair Cash Retainer
	$
	20,000
	


	Technology Committee Chair Cash Retainer
	$
	20,000
	


	Finance Committee Chair Cash Retainer
	$
	20,000
	


	Governance Committee Chair Cash Retainer
	$
	15,000
	


	Finance Committee Member Cash Retainer (other than Committee Chair)
	$
	10,000
	


	Audit Committee Member Cash Retainer (other than Committee Chair)
	$
	15,000
	


	Compensation Committee Member Cash Retainer (other than Committee Chair)
	$
	10,000
	


	Technology Committee Member Cash Retainer (other than Committee Chair)
	$
	10,000
	


	Governance Committee Member Cash Retainer (other than Committee Chair)
	$
	7,500
	







Equity Retainers


All directors other than the Lead Director shall, at the time of the annual stockholders’ meeting (“ASM”), shall be granted a number of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) worth the equivalent of $110,000 at the then current stock price. Such RSUs will vest annually.


The Lead Director shall, at the time of the ASM, shall be granted a number of RSUs worth the equivalent  of $125,000 at the then current stock price. The Chairman shall, at the time of the ASM, shall be granted a number of RSUs worth the equivalent of $147,500 at the then current stock price. Such RSUs will vest annually.


New Director Equity Grants


All new directors shall be granted a number of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) worth the equivalent of
$50,000 at the then current stock price. Such RSUs will vest annually and will be granted at the next ASM after their appointment.


Fee Deferral


Directors may defer all or part of their cash fees and equity retainers into deferred stock units which will be payable in Company shares to the Director only upon termination from Board Service.


Expense Reimbursement


Directors are reimbursed by the Company for their out-of-pocket travel and related expenses incurred in attending all Board and committee meetings.


Pro-ration of Annual Cash Retainers for New Directors


To the extent a director is appointed at a time other than the ASM, any Annual Cash Retainers will be prorated.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.22-10014-SMG

 Chapter 13

Lorenzo Allen,

____Debtor______________/

FINAL REPORT OF MORTGAGE MODIFICATION MEDIATOR

The undersigned court-appointed mortgage modification mediator, reports to the Court as follows:

A. The second Mortgage Modification Mediation (“MMM”) conference was

conducted on 8/10/2022 and the following parties were present:

1. [X] The Debtor’s attorney, Van Horn Law Group

2. [ ] The co-obligor/co-borrower/or other third party, _______________

________________________________________________________

3. [X]The Lender’s representative,Wendy Parente

and Lender’s attorney, David Levy, RAS LegalGroup

4. [ ] Other: 

B. The final MMM conference was scheduled for , but not conducted for the

following reason:

1. [ ] The parties settled prior to attending.

2. [ The case was dismissed.

3. [ ] The Debtor and Debtor’s attorney failed to attend.

4. [ ] The Lender’s representative or [ ] Lender’s attorney failed to attend.

5. [ ] Other: 

C. The result of the MMM conference is as follows:

1. [X] The parties reached an agreement.

2. [ ] The parties did not reach an agreement.

Dated: October 13, 2022 Donna A. Bumgardner

Signature of Mediator

Print name: Donna A. Bumgardner

7707 N University Dr, #103

Tamarac, FL 33321

954-724-4366

DonnaBkcLaw@AOL.com

Copies to:

By ECF:Van Horn Law Group., RAS Legal Group for Lender, Robin Weiner, Trustee.

MMM-LF-13 (08/01/14)

Case 22-10014-SMG Doc 90 Filed 10/13/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-25071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 75

[EPA-HQ[dash]OAR-2005-0132; FRL-8511-1]
RIN 2060-AN16


Revisions to the Continuous Emissions Monitoring Rule for the 
Acid Rain Program, NO<INF>x</INF> Budget Trading Program, Clean Air 
Interstate Rule, and the Clean Air Mercury Rule

Correction

    In rule document E7-25071 beginning on page 4312 in the issue of 
Thursday, January 24, 2008 make the following correction:

Appendix F to Part 75 [Corrected]

    On page 4373, the equation should read as set forth below:
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24JA08.020
    

[FR Doc. Z7-25071 Filed 2-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EX PARTE David Gaston PRICE

1160573 (2160133)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
Ervin STEWART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Dustin GILL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1456

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 03, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Willie Joe JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Renan VIART-SOTOLONGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2026

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5351 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the transfer of any individual detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5351 EH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ANY TRANSFER OF ANY INDI2 VIDUAL DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL 

3 STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—No amounts authorized to be ap5 propriated or otherwise available for any department or 

6 agency of the United States Government may be used dur7 ing the period specified in subsection (b) to transfer, re8 lease, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the 

9 United States, its territories, or possessions, or to any for10 eign country or entity, of any individual detained at Guan11 tanamo. 

12 (b) SPECIFIED PERIOD.—The period specified in this 

13 subsection is the period that— 

14 (1) begins on the date of the enactment of this 

15 Act; and 

16 (2) ends on the earlier of— 

17 (A) the date of the enactment of an Act 

18 authorizing appropriations for military activities 

19 of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 

20 2017; or 

21 (B) January 21, 2017. 

22 (c) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DE23 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘individual detained at 

24 Guantanamo’’ means an individual located at United 

25 States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of Octo26 ber 1, 2009, who— 
3 

•HR 5351 EH

1 (1) is not a national of the United States (as 

2 defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration 

3 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)) or a 

4 member of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

5 and 

6 (2) is— 

7 (A) in the custody or under the control of 

8 the Department of Defense; or 

9 (B) otherwise detained at United States 

10 Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5351 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the transfer of any individual detained 

Bay, Cuba. at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

## By Year

              - (-)2022(2)

Photography  Hidden Lake

Photography  Barometer or Barograph
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5391 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5391

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance certain duties of 
     the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gains in Global Nuclear Detection 
Architecture Act''.

SEC. 2. DUTIES OF THE DOMESTIC NUCLEAR DETECTION OFFICE.

    Section 1902 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 592) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) Implementation.--In carrying out paragraph (6) of subsection 
(a), the Director of the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office shall--
            ``(1) develop and maintain documentation, such as a 
        technology roadmap and strategy, that--
                    ``(A) provides information on how the Office's 
                research investments align with--
                            ``(i) gaps in the enhanced global nuclear 
                        detection architecture, as developed pursuant 
                        to paragraph (4) of such subsection; and
                            ``(ii) research challenges identified by 
                        the Director; and
                    ``(B) defines in detail how the Office will address 
                such research challenges;
            ``(2) document the rational for prioritizing and selecting 
        research topics; and
            ``(3) develop a systematic approach, which may include 
        annual metrics and periodic qualitative evaluations, for 
        evaluating how the outcomes of the Office's individual research 
        projects collectively contribute to addressing the Office's 
        research challenges.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5391

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance certain duties of 
     the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, and for other purposes.
```