alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           12762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   205895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     569637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                853802
<PP&E>                                         1649213
<DEPRECIATION>                                  249359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2718241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1741112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        451
<COMMON>                                           508
<OTHER-SE>                                     5255889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2718241
<SALES>                                         518327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                518327
<CGS>                                           346126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   346126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1880798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (45524)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1754121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1754121)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
July 1, 2015

Mr. John P. Creed

8009 Cooke Road

Elkins Park, PA 19027

Dear Mr. John P. Creed:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ § 45.27(a), 45.29 (3)(c)

- (h), 61.113 (a) and (b), 91.103, 91.105, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121,

91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, 91.417, and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you shou ld do in the next

30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 22, 2015

, exemption request into the public docket

(No. FAA− 20 15

− 1258 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments avai lable to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

B renda Robeson

Program Analyst

, A ircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Mark S. Clayton, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Nova Star Innovations, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 27, 2007 /s/ Mark S. Clayton Mark S. Clayton Principal Executive Officer
EX PARTE ALABAMA STATE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT et al.

1160461 (2150854)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Christopher KIRCHNER, Appellant, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB d/b/a Christiana Trust, not Individually by as Trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust and Jacques-Partrice White, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3657

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE J.R.

1160460 (2150688)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Jaquavius FRANCIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Willie George DIXON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3367

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 16, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin Foster Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Willie George Dixon, Jr. raises three issues on appeal. The first, regarding the trial court's failure to conduct a proper competency determination, requires reversal-which the State concedes. The other two we find to be without merit. The remedy is a remand for the trial court to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency evaluation; if one cannot be done, Dixon must *873receive a new trial. *See**Brooks v. State* , 180 So.3d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

______________________________

 )

In re ) CASE NO. 22-10311-RAM

)

MOBY S.P.A., ) CHAPTER 15

 )

Debtor. )

______________________________)

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON 

PETITION FOR RECOGNITION AND MOTION FOR RELATED RELIEF

Upon the Court’s review of the Verified Petition for 

Recognition of Foreign Main Proceeding and Motion for Order Granting 

Related Relief Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 1515, 1517, 1520 

and 1521 (the “Motion”) [DE #6], it is –

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court will conduct a hearing on the Motion on February 

24, 2022 at 1:30 PM. The hearing will be conducted by video 

conference using the services of Zoom Video Communications, Inc. 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 19, 2022.

Case 22-10311-RAM Doc 10 Filed 01/19/22 Page 1 of 2
2

2. For instructions regarding the video conference, please 

refer to the General Procedures for Hearings By Video Conference on 

Judge Mark’s web page on the Court’s website, 

https://www.flsb.uscourts.gov/judges/judge-robert-mark.

3. To register for the video conference, click on the 

following link or manually enter the following link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItd-mpqDMiG8VokhBvrC6P0g0JNbOi4RQ

4. The deadline for filing an objection(s) to the Motion is

February 16, 2022.

###

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

Patricia B. Tomasco, Esq.

UST

(Attorney Tomasco is directed to serve a copy of this Order on all 

interested parties and to file a certificate of service)

Case 22-10311-RAM Doc 10 Filed 01/19/22 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ATNG,  Inc.,  a Texas
corporation (the "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Robert Simpson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                           By  /s/  ROBERT SIMPSON
                                             ----------------------------------
                                               Robert Simpson
                                               Chief Executive Officer of
                                               ATNG, Inc.
                                               July 31, 2003
EX PARTE Jaquavious Akeem WEATHERS

1160575 (CR-15-1265)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
#           Pacific Islands Water Science Center      

      March 9, 2016    

            -              Overview
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 77 (Monday, April 21, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 21415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-6633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

[USN-2008-0016]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

Correction

    In notice document E8-6633 beginning on page 17331 in the issue of 
Tuesday, April 1, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 17332. in the first column, the system title ``N0586-1'' 
should read ``N05861-1''.

[FR Doc. Z8-6633 Filed 4-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY PETERS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-30388

D.C. No. 9:09-cr-00023-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

Michael Anthony Peters appeals from his 120-month mandatory minimum

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B) and 846. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-30388

Peters contends that his mandatory minimum sentence is substantively

unreasonable because it is greater than necessary under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

Peters’s contention is foreclosed. United States v. Wipf, No. 09-50291, 2010 WL

3398258, at *2 (9th Cir. 2010) (Section 3553 does not authorize a court to impose

a sentence below the mandatory statutory minimum.). 

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - (-)colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        February 23, 2023        Volcanic explosion penetrates both upper atmosphere and upper crust around the globe
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the Report on Form 10-QSB of Total Luxury  Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the nine  months  ended  September  30,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Robert M.
Lawand, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                    /s/ Robert M. Lawand
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Robert  M. Lawand
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                                    Date: December 8, 2006
Fw: pesticide water quality monitoring data

Jordan Page to: Jack Faulk 05/12/2010 12:32 PM

Not sure If you've got this one

Jordan Page, ORISE Fellow

Office of Wastewater Management, Permits Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20460

Phone: 202.564.2952

Page.Jordan@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Jordan Page/DC/USEPA/US on 05/12/2010 12:31 PM -----

From: "Johnson, Jessica N." <jnjohnson@nd.gov>

To: Jordan Page/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/22/2010 01:15 PM

Subject: pesticide water quality monitoring data

Hello,

I am providing state pesticide water quality monitoring results, our reports for 2008 and 2009 are on our

website at:

http://www.agdepartment.com/Programs/Plant/WaterQuality.html

I have attached the QAPP.

Let me know if you need more information.

Thank you,

jessica

Jessica Johnson

Environmental Scientist

Agricultural Chemical Division

ND Department of Agriculture

Telephone: (701) 328-2980

Toll free: 1-800-242-7535

Fax: 701-328-4567
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Nestor SAROZA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Wave climate and trends along the eastern Chukchi Arctic Alaska coast      

      January 1, 2011    

Due in large part to the difficulty of obtaining measurements in the Arctic, little is known about the wave climate along the coast of Arctic Alaska. In this study, numerical model simulations encompassing 40 years of wave hind-casts were used to assess mean and extreme wave conditions. Results indicate that the wave climate was strongly modulated by large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns and that mean and extreme wave heights and periods exhibited increasing trends in both the sea and swell frequency bands over the time-period studied (1954–2004). Model simulations also indicate that the upward trend was not due to a decrease in the minimum icepack extent.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

## Related Content

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

### Explore Search

                  - Forecasts and Models
                  - Coastal and Marine Hazards
                  - Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources
                  - Coastal Vulnerability Assessments
                  - Climate
                  - Coasts
                  - Methods and Analyses
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Science Technology
                  - ocean waves
                  - wave climate
                  - computer model simulations
                  - atmospheric circulation patterns
                  - Chukchi Sea
                  - United States
                  - eastern Chukchi coast
                  - Alaska

View All **
William Gilbert STRICKLAND, Petitioner, v. Crisanto C. OXONIAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria I. Oxonian, Deceased; Jessica Lauren Wicky; and Karen Smith Strickland, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
ATTACHMENT A-2 

STATE OF CONNECTICUT 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

HEARING CERTIFICATION 

This certifies in accordance with the provisions of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 

51 .102 that the following actions were taken regarding amendment of R.C.S .A. sections 22a-174-

4 and 22a-174-7 : 

1) The public hearing was held on October 23, 2002 as announced in the notice of 

hearing (copy attached); 

2) In accordance with the notice, materials were available for review in each Air 

Quality Control Region (AQCR) in Connecticut; 

3) Copies of the notice were mailed to the directors of the air pollution control 

agencies in New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts along with a 

copy to the Director of the Air Management Division of Region I of the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency; and 

4) The notice of hearing was published in newspapers as follows : 

Newspaper AQCR Date 

Connecticut Law Journal . September 17,2002 

Connecticut Post (Bridgeport) 43 September 17, 2002 

Hartford Courant 42 September 17, 2002 

New London Day 41 September 17, 2002 

The Register Citizen (Torrington) 44 September 17, 2002 

October Ss 2004 

Date /s/ Merrily A. Gere 

Bureau of Air Management 

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 

79 Elm Street " Hartford, CT 06106 - 5127 

http ://dep .state .ct.us 

An Equal Opportunity Employer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**IN RE: ADOPTION OF: E.P., III**

**PETITION OF: A.M., MOTHER :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 17 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
S I 0-100901-07 6 

# XO TFnO f J^T

" !> ¥ CENTE R Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d Secretaryo fTransportatio n U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 40 0 7t h Street , S.W. , Washingto n D.C . 2059 0 Augus t 28,201 0 >S 2

••:zr > ..— > 

### r o >



## .. o / • ' - - \s^ ' :;-;3-L; 3 rn,<:_-j5 : 

### —^SifiS

C O SecretaryLaHood : Th e Toled o Express Airpor t ha s suffere d fro m a significan t declin e i n it s ai rservic e ove rth e pas t decade . Airlin e capacit ya t Toled o Express i s dow n 66 % fro m 200 2 an d th e numbe ro fairline s servin g th e communit yis dow n fro m sixt o three . I n ligh t o fthi s circumstanc e th e Toled o Express Airpor t an d its communit ypartner s hav e mad e a n applicatio n fo ra Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Grant . This Gran t woul d b e use d fo ra n aggressiv e an d extende d marketin g an d promotiona l campaig n t o recaptur e Toled o are a ai rtrave l deman d tha t i s no wusin g alternativ e airport s Th e Airpor t an d it s partner s wil l matc h th e Gran t fundin g wit h a significan t loca l cas h match . Th e Airport ha s als o develope d a comprehensiv e ne wai rservic e incentiv e program , includin g groun d handlin g suppor t an d startu p phas e fe e waivers . Th e combinatio n o fth e Gran t supporte d marlcetin g an d promotiona l fundin g an d th e Airpor t develope d incentiv e progra m wil l giv e Toled o th e tool s i t need s t o revers e th e leakag e o floca l ai rtrave l deman d t o othe r airport s an d re-establis h som e o fth e ai rservic e tha t ha s bee n los t i n recen t years . I urg e yo u t o giv e th e Toled o Smal l Communit yGran t Applicatio n you rfulles t consideration . Favorabl e consideratio n o fthi s Gran t applicatio n b yth e Departmen t o fTransportatio n woul d b e greatl yappreciated . Sincerely , 

# P A Rand yCba t Rand yCbate n Genera l Manage r Toled o Je t Cente r



### 1159 1 WES T AIRPOR T SERVIC ERD . 

### • SWANTON , 

### O H 4355 8 PHON E

### (419 ) 866-905 0 • FA X

### (419 ) 866-904 7