alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

43292 

Vol. 71, No. 146 

Monday, July 31, 2006 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

[Docket No. TSA–2006–25335] 

RIN 1652–AZ08 

Privacy Act of 1974: System of 

Records; National Finance Center 

(NFC) Payroll Personnel System 

Correction 

In notice document E6–11235 

beginning on page 40530 in the issue of 

Monday, July 17, 2006, make the 

following correction: 

On page 40532, in the third column, 

in the signature block, the signature date 

‘‘Issued in Arlington, Virginia.’’ should 

read ‘‘Issued in Arlington, Virginia, July 

11, 2006’’. 

[FR Doc. Z6–11235 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. FMCSA-2005-23459] 

Hours of Service of Drivers: National 

Ready Mixed Concrete Association 

Application for Exemption 

Correction 

In notice document E6–11289 

beginning on page 40778 in the issue of 

Tuesday, July 18, 2006 make the 

following correction: 

On page 40780, in the first column, in 

the signature block, the signature title 

‘‘Acting Administration’’ should read 

‘‘Acting Administrator’’. 

[FR Doc. Z6–11289 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  | November  9, 2004 | By:                                           | /s/ Steven C. Ackmann |   |
|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |              | Steven C. Ackmann,                                 |
|   |              |   President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                   |                                                    |                       |        |  |

 

----
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 76 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36316) and Amendment No. 579 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 7, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 4, 2017
Martin, Michael (OST) QC T - Q S'^ - 90Q A - W ^ ^ij p 

From: TerryandDarIa Bell [tclbell2@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:31 AM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Colgan Air Service 

Since moving to Tampa in 1990, the Altoona-Blair County airport has been my direct Unk and quickest access 

to my parents in Hollidaysburg. I have flown the routes many times now and been through several carriers. I am 

very satisfied with the Colgan Air service. They are timely and friendly. I like the size of the planes. I would 

prefer flying directly to Dulles in the afternoon and not having to go to Johnstown. But, I will take going to 

Johnstown to keep the air service. Thank you for having Colgan Air service as they have gotten me back 

"home" for many family events. Darla Bell 

Darla Bell 

1901 Brinson Road Unit 2 

Lutz, FL 33558 

Cell: 813-758-8354 ' ! 

c:::>
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

1997

Vol. 63, No. 8

Tuesday, January 13, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER97-4817-001]

Cinergy Services, Inc., The Cincinnati

Gas & Electric Co. and PSI Energy,

Inc., Notice of Filing

Correction

In notice document 97–34016

appearing on page 68280 in the issue of

Wednesday, December 31, 1997 the

docket number should read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 94N-0376]

Plascon, Inc., dba Anderson Plasma

Center; Denial of Request for a Hearing

and Revocation of U.S. License No.

572-003

Correction

In notice document 97–33373

beginning on page 67078 in the issue of

Tuesday, December 23, 1997 make the

following correction:

On page 67078, in the second column,

under DATES, in the last line ‘‘December

23, 1998’’ should read ‘‘December 23,

1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 81

[Docket No. FR-4297-A-01]

RIN 2501-AC41

The Secretary of HUD’s Regulation of

the Federal National Mortgage

Association (Fannie Mae) and the

Federal Home Loan Mortgage

Corporation (Freddie Mac); Advance

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Correction

In proposed rule document 97-33731,

beginning on page 68060, in the issue of

Tuesday, December 30, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 68060, in the first column, in

the COMMENT DUE DATE entry, in the

fourth line, ‘‘March 30, 1997’’ should

read ‘‘March 30, 1998’’.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97–ASO–20]

Amendment of Class E Airspace;

Covington, KY

Correction

In rule document 97–33618 beginning

on page 67266 in the issue of

Wednesday, December 24, 1997, make

the following correction:

On page 67267, in the first column, in

the last paragraph, in the fifth line from

the bottom, ‘‘105–mile’’ should read

‘‘10.5–mile’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
AIR PROVIDENCIA USA, LLC, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. J.V. AIR MAINTENANCE, INC., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0446

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 34 (Monday, February 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z9-1807]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59273; File No. SR-FINRA-2008-067]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change to Adopt 
Rules Governing Financial Responsibility in the Consolidated FINRA 
Rulebook

Correction

    In notice document E9-1807 beginning on page 4992 in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 28, 2009 make the following correction:
    On page 4992, in the third column, under the subject paragraph the 
date ``January 22, 2009'' should appear.

[FR Doc. Z9-1807 Filed 2-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
# C_2021056EN.01006101.xml

| 16.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/61

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Directive 2006/112/EC as regards temporary measures in relation to value added tax for COVID-19 vaccines and in vitro diagnostic medical devices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic’

(COM(2020) 688 final — 2020/0311 (CNS))

(2021/C 56/09)

| Referral | Council of the European Union, 6.11.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion |
| Adopted at plenary | 2.12.2020 |
| Plenary session No | 556 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 195/0/3 |

Referral

Council of the European Union, 6.11.2020

Legal basis

Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion

Adopted at plenary

2.12.2020

Plenary session No

556

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

195/0/3

Since the Committee has announced its support for taxation rules due to the COVID-19 crisis in its opinion on the Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU to address the urgent need for deferring certain time limits for the filing and exchange of information in the field of taxation due to the COVID-19 pandemic (COM(2020) 197 final — 2020/0081 (CNS)); on the Proposal for a Council Decision amending Directives (EU) 2017/2455 and (EU) 2019/1995 as regards the dates of transposition and application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis (COM(2020) 198 final — 2020/0082 (CNS)) and on the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2454 as regards the dates of application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis (COM(2020) 201 final — 2020/0084 (CNS)) (1), adopted on 10 June 2020 and this amendment to Directive 2006/112/EC does not contain any further content for the EESC to comment on, it decided, at its 556th plenary session of 2 and 3 December 2020 (meeting of 2 December 2020), by 195 votes with 3 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the abovementioned document.

Brussels, 2 December 2020.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 18.9.2020, p. 76.

1

---
From: Steckel, Andrew To: Reyes Romero ; Monica Soucier Cc: Yannayon, Laura ; Law, Nicole Subject: comment on Imperial Rule 101 Date: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:47:02 AM



## Monica and Reyes - I looked at your proposed revisions to Rule 101 that do not relate to permits and the only one I don't understand is:
MILITARY BASE: means a military base that is designated for closure or downward realignment pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-526) or the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (10 United States Code Sec. 2687 et seq.).
Please make sure you mean to define "Military Base" only as those bases that are closing.
Laura reviewed definitions related to permits and does not have comments at this time. I believe we will separately send you comments on the draft combustion rules in the near future.
- Andy
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Center News        April 9, 2023        The paper is out: Did you know about cascading hazards from asteroid impacts?

Center News        June 28, 2022        Asteroid Day: How do you prepare for an asteroid impact?

slideshow        July 20, 2023        Planetary Science at the USGS
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Gold Resource Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement No. 333-171779 on Form S-8 and registration statement
No. 333-170101 on Form S-3 of Gold Resource Corporation of our report dated March 18, 2013 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Resource Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2012, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Resource Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2012.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ StarkSchenkein, LLP                              
|StarkSchenkein, LLP Denver, Colorado
November 7, 2013
Victor J. FILSAIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD BUZZARD, Jr.,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

TIMOTHY WENGLER,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-35009

D.C. No. CV-06-01653-JLR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Ronald Buzzard, Jr. appeals from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for failure to

comply with a court order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We

FILED

SEP 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-35009

review for abuse of discretion, Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir.

2002), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed Buzzard’s

habeas petition without prejudice because he failed to comply with the court’s

order to timely file an amended petition. See Pagtalunan, 291 F.3d at 641-44

(setting forth five factors to be weighed in determining whether to dismiss a claim

for failure to comply with a court order); see also Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272,

273 (9th Cir. 1992) (the district court has inherent authority to manage its docket). 

The record indicates that Buzzard had several opportunities to comply, but did not

do so even after being warned that failure to submit an amended petition would

result in dismissal. See Pagtalunan, 291 F.3d at 641-44.

Buzzard’s remaining contentions regarding the certified issue are

unpersuasive.

We construe Buzzard’s arguments regarding uncertified issues as a motion

to expand the certificate of appealability, and we deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R.

22-1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir. 1999) (per

curiam).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Leandre HOWARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0942

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
April 8, 2010 

Kevin Adams 

Essential Air Service Division ^--, 

Offiee of Aviation Analysis ^ 

U.S. Department of Transportation ci 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE T j 

Washington, DC 20590 • ; 

Dear Mr. Adams, 

The recent letter of Island Air regarding our service to Karluk contains several false 

statements that must be corrected on the record. The language noted in point one of 

Island Air's letter came directly from the DOT's own Order, and Servant was merely 

confirming the understanding. 

Island Air claims that if Servant is serving Larsen Bay, why can't it also serve nearby 

Karluk which is on the same scheduled flight? Servant filed a schedule to Larsen Bay to 

provide needed traffic support for the Karluk Service. When the aircraft necessary for 

the Karluk operation was lost. Servant cancelled its proposed service to Larsen Bay as 

well. There is no conflict or inconsistency in its current service pattern. 

As noted in our letter of March 18, Servant is working hard to locate a suitable 

replacement STOL aircraft for Karluk service. At this point we do not have a firm date 

for service restoration. We do not understand Island Air's point about when service 

could be restored because in the meantime Island continues to be subsidized and is the 

only carrier serving Karluk. In the worst case scenario for Servant, Island Air gets 

exactly what it requested for subsidy, and gets to operate during the peak season before 

going into winter service. 

The most outlandish statement made by Island Air is that the loss of our Islander was 

somehow related to an overall plan to abandon service at Karluk even before it began. 

Both the tone and the content of the letter are false, and really add nothing to the issue of 

maintaining Essential Air Service at Karluk at the lowest cost possible. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Wes Osowski 

General Manager 

Servant Air Inc.
Juan Ernesto ROQUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2388

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - products_web_tools(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(14)
              - alaska(74)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(28)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(152)
              - colorado(79)
              - connecticut(17)
              - delaware(11)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(36)
              - georgia(18)
              - (-)guam(3)
              - hawaii(80)
              - idaho(24)
              - illinois(4)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(21)
              - maine(17)
              - maryland(17)
              - massachusetts(27)
              - michigan(14)
              - minnesota(20)
              - mississippi(16)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(20)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(23)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(17)
              - new york(61)
              - north carolina(29)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(6)
              - oregon(32)
              - pennsylvania(15)
              - puerto rico(19)
              - rhode island(14)
              - south carolina(11)
              - south dakota(39)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(15)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(31)
              - vermont(9)
              - virginia(25)
              - washington(54)
              - west virginia(7)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(36)

## By Year

publication        October 16, 2018        Tropical cyclone projections: Changing climate threats for Pacific Island defense installations

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper

publication        July 19, 2019        Volcanic hazards in the Pacific U.S. Territories
**Exhibit 12.1**I, Inga K. Beale, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Converium Holding AG.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe company and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which could adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:February 28, 2006By: /s/ Inga K. Beale