alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Raul Leyba Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 4,650.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 1,400.00

Balance Due $ 3,250.00

2. $ 313.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Unless otherwise agreed, the fee for the preparation and filing of motions to value real property is $750.00;

preparation and filing of motions to value personal property is $500.00; preparation and filing of motions to avoid

lien is $500.00. An additional $25.00 will be charged for costs incurred in the filing of motions. Negotiations with

secured creditors to reduce to market value; representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions;

appeals or any other adversary proceeding and any other motions not listed above will be charged at an hourly

rate pursuant to the retainer agreement.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

December 29, 2021 /s/ Patrick L. Cordero, Esq.

Date Patrick L. Cordero, Esq. 801992

Signature of Attorney

Law Office of Patrick L. Cordero, PA

7333 Coral Way

Miami, FL 33155

305-445-4855 Fax: 305-445-9483

ECFMAIL@pcorderolaw.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-22083-RAM Doc 4 Filed 12/29/21 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-40159

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Luis Rivera, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:24-MJ-2-1

______________________________

Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Rivera, Jr., has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Rivera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 3, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-40159 Document: 37-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024
No. 24-40159

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 24-40159 Document: 37-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2024
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 17, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 37316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

29 CFR Chapters XXVI and XL

RIN 1212-AA75


Reorganization, Renumbering, and Reinvention of Regulations; 
Correction

Correction

    In rule document 96-17791 beginning on page 36626 in the issue of 
Friday, July 12, 1996 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 36626, third column, instruction 10., fifth line, ``it'' 
should read ``i<INF>t''.
    2. On page 36627, first column, instruction 11, fifth line, 
``interger and o<y<ls-thn-eq>n<INF>i),'' should read ``interger and 
0<y<ls-thn-eq>n<INF>i),''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOAMMAR BADAWI DOKHAN,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 08-0987 (JDB)

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

 Respondents.

ORDER

The Case Management Order (CMO) in this case imposes several discovery obligations

on respondents that are cabined by a "reasonably available" limitation. See Case Management

Order (March 3, 2009) at § I.D (dkt. ent. #87). In response to respondents' arguments in other

habeas cases involving Guantanamo detainees that the "automatic" discovery obligations

imposed by section I.E.1 of the CMO are unduly burdensome, the Court has interpreted section

I.E.1 to be cabined by a similar limitation. See Zaid v. Obama, Civ.A.No. 05-1646, Orders on

Feb. 9, 2009 and March 2, 2009. Respondents' obligations under both sections I.D and I.E.1 are

impacted as well by President Obama's January 22, 2009 Executive Order, which directs the

Attorney General to:

[A]ssemble all information in the possession of the Federal

Government that pertains to any individual currently detained at

Guantanamo and that is relevant to determining the proper

disposition of any such individual. All executive branch

departments and agencies shall promptly comply with any request

of the Attorney General to provide information in their possession

or control pertaining to any such individual.

See Exec. Order No. 13,492 at § 4(c)(1), 74 Fed. Reg. 4897 (Jan. 22, 2009). The Executive

Order will presumably add to the information that is reasonably available to respondents and may
 The Court does not know -- indeed, respondents themselves may not know -- whether 1

the government intends to create new consolidated files for each petitioner or to supplement the

existing consolidated files created by JTF-GTMO and OARDEC. Whatever course is taken,

respondents should expect to review and report on the new information about petitioner, if any,

that the process outlined in section 4(c)(1) of the Executive Order gathers.

include information responsive to sections I.D. and I.E.1. 

Consistent with the Court's approach in other Guantanamo habeas cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the government file a status report in this case, in writing and on April 9, 2009,

advising whether the process outlined in section 4(c)(1) of the Executive Order has been

completed, whether additional information regarding petitioner has been gathered, and if not yet

complete, when the process is estimated to be done. The status report shall also advise whether 1

respondents have obtained additional information responsive to sections I.D or I.E.1 of the CMO

in this case and whether all such information has been produced to petitioner. This approach

should allow petitioner's case to proceed with minimal burden to the government yet at the same

time enable petitioner to develop his case.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Date: March 4, 2009
Case 21-21611-AJC Doc 22 Filed 02/16/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-21611-AJC Doc 22 Filed 02/16/22 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin R. Keating, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin R. Keating
------------------------------------
Kevin R. Keating
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
November 13, 2009





                                       47
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gajus V. Worthington, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Fluidigm Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gajus V. Worthington             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Gajus V. Worthington                 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 4, 2022.

Case 21-16804-AJC Doc 61 Filed 03/07/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-16804-AJC Doc 61 Filed 03/07/22 Page 2 of 2
BOYLE & DRAKE, INC., Appellant, v. PELICAN VIEW PROJECT, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1807

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR

RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Universal Communication Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)

The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 21, 2006

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ MICHAELZWEBNER     
| |     | Michael Zwebner        
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2001-B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 1, 2001 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2001-B, as issuer
(the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
              January 1, 2003 until December 31, 2003 was conducted under my
              supervision.

         2.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
              knowledge, fully performed in all material respects all its
              obligations, under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout
              such period and no material default in the performance of such
              obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
              paragraph 3 below.

         3.   None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2004.



                                           /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                           ----------------------
                                           Richard J. Naeder
                                           Authorized Signatory
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.3
TERMINATION AMENDMENT
Effective April 30, 2017


To


Intercompany Agreement,
dated January 1, 2010, 
(“Agreement”)


 between


ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company
(nka Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company) 


And


Directed Services LLC


Whereas, Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company (“VRIAC”) and Directed Services LLC (“DSL”) entered into an Intercompany Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2010 (the Intercompany Agreement, as amended, is hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”); 


Whereas, the parties wish to terminate the Agreement effective as of the close of business on April 30, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) 


Now, therefore, the parties mutually agree as follows:


In accordance with Section 8 of the Agreement, VRIAC and DSL mutually acknowledge and agree that the Agreement (other than the payment provisions and calculation obligations of Section 1 with respect to all periods up to and including the Effective Date) shall terminate and be of no further force and effect from and after the Effective Date.  As a result of payment for all periods up to and including the Effective Date in accordance with Section 1 of the Agreement, the parties hereby acknowledge and agree that all of DSL’s payment obligations in respect of the Agreement shall be fully discharged, released and terminated.


This Amendment is effective as of the Effective Date.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their authorized representatives on June 29, 2017. 


Directed Services LLC    Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company






By:_/s/Megan Huddleston____________    By:_/s/ Elizabeth Schroeder_________________
Name:_Megan Huddleston____________    Name:__ Elizabeth Schroeder_______________
Title:_SVP and Assistant Secretary_______    Title:_Vice President_______________________
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.44
-------------

                  THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE RES-PBGC MEMORANDUM OF
                      UNDERSTANDING DATED NOVEMBER 2, 1998

         THIS THIRD AMENDMENT to the RES-PBGC Memorandum of Understanding by and
between the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and RES Holding Corporation is
made and entered into as of the 22nd day of March, 2000, by and between the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and Republic Technologies International,
LLC.

                                   WITNESSETH
                                   ----------

WHEREAS, by last signature dated November 2, 1998, RES Holding Corporation
("RES") and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU"); and

WHEREAS, all events under clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 1 of the MOU have
occurred, including the Combination of RES and RESI under a common ultimate
parent, such ultimate parent being Republic Technologies International, LLC
("RTI"); and

WHEREAS, under the MOU, RTI must make certain "Required Contributions,"
including a payment of $7,500,000 on January 1, 2000; and

WHEREAS, effective December 29, 1999, RTI and PBGC executed an Amendment of the
MOU under which PBGC agreed to allow RTI to defer $5,500,000 of the January 1,
2000 payment until March 15, 2000;

WHEREAS, effective March 15, 2000, RTI and PBGC executed a Second Amendment of
the MOU under which PBGC agreed to allow RTI to defer the $5,500,000 payment
until March 22, 2000;

NOW THEREFORE, RTI and PBGC agree to the following:

1. Subsections (b) and (c) of section 3 of the MOU are further amended as
follows:

         (a)      to change the new row added by the Amendment to each table,
                  with the words "no later than 3/22/00" in the contribution
                  "Date" column, to read "no later than 3/29/00."


                                       1
<PAGE>   2



2. Except as the MOU is modified by this Third Amendment, the MOU remains
unchanged and in full force and effect, and the parties hereby ratify and affirm
the MOU as modified hereby.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and agreed as of the date first
written above.



                                            PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION




Date: March 22, 2000                By: /s/ Andrea Schneider
      --------------                    --------------------
                                       ANDREA SCHNEIDER, CHIEF NEGOTIATOR
                                       AND DIRECTOR CORPORATE FINANCE AND
                                       NEGOTIATIONS DEPARTMENT





                                    REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,LLC




DATE:  March 22, 2000               BY: /s/ JOSEPH F. LAPINSKY
      ---------------                   ----------------------

                                    ITS:

                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 140 (Tuesday, July 22, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements, Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

Correction

    In notice document 97-18470, appearing on page 37949, in the issue 
of Tuesday, July 15, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 37949, in the first column, in the DATES section, ``August 
14, 1997'' should be inserted.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 21-10748-AJC Doc 27 Filed 04/15/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-10748-AJC Doc 27 Filed 04/15/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-10748-AJC Doc 27 Filed 04/15/21 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7424

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAYMOND H. MCDONALD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-91-552, CA-00-3944-4-19) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond H. McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Raymond H. McDonald appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in part to the Government on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We dismiss theappeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - (-)documents_file(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - (-)2021(1)

file  MOU between USGS and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ LLOYD
      LANE
              Lloyd
      Lane
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Dated: December
      16, 2008
              
              
              /s/ JAMES
      CARROLL
              James
      Carroll
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Dated: December
      16, 2008
              
              
              /s/ JAMES
      CARROLL
              James
      Carroll
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
              Dated: December
      16, 2008




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.