alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

AN ACT 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian 

lands under the National Labor Relations Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 511 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Labor Sov3 ereignty Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER. 

5 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

6 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or any In8 dian tribe, or any enterprise or institution owned 

9 and operated by an Indian tribe and located on its 

10 Indian lands,’’ after ‘‘subdivision thereof,’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(15) The term ‘Indian tribe’ means any Indian 

13 tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or 

14 community which is recognized as eligible for the special 

15 programs and services provided by the United States to 

16 Indians because of their status as Indians. 

17 ‘‘(16) The term ‘Indian’ means any individual who 

18 is a member of an Indian tribe. 

19 ‘‘(17) The term ‘Indian lands’ means— 

20 ‘‘(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 

21 reservation; 

22 ‘‘(B) any lands title to which is either held in 

23 trust by the United States for the benefit of any In24 dian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe 

25 or individual subject to restriction by the United 

26 States against alienation; and 
3 

•HR 511 EH

1 ‘‘(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that 

2 are within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 

3 defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a feder4 ally recognized Indian tribe.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

AN ACT 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes 

tions Act. on Indian lands under the National Labor Rela-
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 72 SSM 1 The People &c., Respondent, v. Ronnell Jordan, Appellant.

Submitted by Kevin C. Adam, for appellant. Submitted by Amy Appelbaum, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant failed to preserve his contention that the trial court discharged prospective jurors based on hardship without conducting a sufficient inquiry (see People v King , __ NY3d __ [decided herewith]). Defendant's remaining contentions - 1 -- 2 - No. SSM 1 are without merit.

- 2 -People v Ronnell Jordan No. SSM 1

Rivera, J (dissenting): For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in People v King (___ NY3d ___, [decided herewith]), I would reverse the order of the Appellate Division on the sole ground that the judge's jury selection process denied defendant his right to a jury trial. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Judges Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur. Judge Rivera dissents in an opinion. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judge Garcia took no part. Decided March 29, 2016

- 1 -
Exhibit






FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2016 TIME VESTED 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT


This FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2016 TIME VESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT, dated as of [DATE], 2017 (this “Amendment”), is hereby entered into by and between Westmoreland Coal Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [Employee Name] (the “Employee”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Time Vested Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, by and between the Company and the Employee, dated May 18, 2016 (the “Restricted Stock Agreement”).


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Restricted Stock Agreement to require the Grantee to satisfy tax withholding obligations through netting of shares awarded under the Restricted Stock Agreement; and


WHEREAS, Section 12.9 of the Restricted Stock Agreement provides that it may only be modified in a manner that could adversely affect Employee’s rights in a writing that is approved by each of the Employee and the Company.


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 10.9 of the Restricted Stock Agreement, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions, and covenants contained herein and in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


1. Section 9.1 of the Restricted Stock Agreement is amended by deleting said Section in its entirety and replacing it with a new Section 9.1 as follows:


9.1     The Grantee shall be required to pay to the Company, and the Company shall have the right to deduct from any compensation paid to the Grantee pursuant to the Plan, the amount of any required withholding taxes in respect of the Restricted Stock Units and to take all such other action as the Committee deems necessary to satisfy all obligations for the payment of such withholding taxes. Any federal, state or local tax withholding obligation relating to the exercise or acquisition or vesting of Common Stock under an Agreement will be satisfied by the Company withholding shares of Common Stock from the shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable to the Grantee as a result of the exercise or acquisition of Common Stock under the Agreement, provided, however, that no shares of Common Stock are withheld with a value exceeding the maximum individual statutory tax rate.


 




[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page to Follow.]











	
			
	 
	 
	 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee, to evidence its consent to this Amendment, has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company, and the Employee, to evidence his consent and approval of all of the terms hereof, has duly executed this Amendment, as of the date first written above.




	
		
	 
	Westmoreland Coal Company

	By:
	 

	

Name:
	Jennifer S. Grafton

	Title:
	CAO & CLO

	 
	 

	 
	Employee

	By:
	 

	

Name:
	 




















































Signature Page to First Amendment to 
2016 Time Vested Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 63762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21212]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95-CE-36-AD; Amendment 39-9336; AD 95-17-07]


Airworthiness Directives; Fairchild Aircraft SA226 Series 
Airplanes

Correction

    In rule document 95-20278 beginning on page 43359 in the issue of 
Monday, August 21, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 43360, in the second column, in the amendment to 
Sec. 39.13, in the table, in the second column, the first entry should 
read ``T201 through T275 and T277 through T291.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Alexy MATOS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5150 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 677
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5150

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 17, 2016

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Leonard 
                    Montalto Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEONARD MONTALTO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Leonard Montalto Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard 
Montalto Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 677

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5150

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Leonard 
                    Montalto Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 17, 2016

                       Reported without amendment
```
Docket Operations M-30 West Building Ground Floor W 12-140, 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Monday, April 08, 2013 United Sates ofAmerican Department ofTransportation Office of Secretary Washington, D.C. Washington DC 20590;3 RE. Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605

.**---~-It** would

# nm be in the best interest oftbe-7.communitiesbeing.:.served-by-Silv.er Airwa'is in Montana to suspend service to Miles City, Montana and Lewistown, Montana atthistime. Ifthis were to happen, the entire system ofservice could be in jeopardyfor the rest ofthe Montana communities being served by Silver Airways.

A continuation of at least the next two year period would give these two communities ample time to make adjustments and form a new plan for increasing ridership. Yes, the law has changed; Lewistown and Miles City have not had ample time to address the impeding loss oftheir air carrier. The impactto both communities, ifthis service isterminated, would be monumentally devastating and tragic leaving the communitiestransportation-less; no rail service! no bus service! Once Essential Air Service is gone it may never return. Montana is a huge state and distances are very large in the scope of being able to move people to a destination hub. Certainly there needsto be some latitudefor the two communities to work toward a solution to their existing lack of boarding's and cost ofthe subsidy per passenger.

At the Montana Essential Air Service Task Force meeting in Billings on April 4, 2013,

some interesting documentation was presented to demonstrate when Denver was the hub. Their boarding'swere far greaterthan having Billings as their hub. This should be investigated and a determination needsto be made based on the prior ridership from both communities. Before a judgment is made, lookat all the facts that may affectthese and the other communitiesthat will be impacted by eliminating the EAS service now being provided. The dynamics of Montana are changing and the purpose ofthe EAS program that began in 1978was and still isto provide airservice to the seven communities in Montana that the system was designed for.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this Montana state-wide problem; it is hoped this Order of Show Cause will not be enforced atthistime, to give the Montana Essential Air ServiceTask Force time to address this issue. There is a solution that needsto be worked out bythe communities in Montana and not a Washington solution that isfar removed from the real problems in Montana.

With Respect,

# ~~ Fred Lark Montana Essential Air ServiceTask Force-Media Representative
NLG, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GENOVESE, JOBLOVE & BATISTA, P.A., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0674

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-52688; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-66]

      ( print page 67784)    

### Correction

In notice document E5-6091 beginning on page 66879 in the issue of Thursday, November 3, 2005, make the following correction:

On page 66880, in the first column, the entire “.25” paragraph should be italicized.

[FR Doc. Z5-6091 Filed 11-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Yosemite Hydroclimate Network: Distributed stream and atmospheric data for the Tuolumne River watershed and surroundings      

      September 1, 2016    

Regions of complex topography and remote wilderness terrain have spatially varying patterns of temperature and streamflow, but due to inherent difficulties of access, are often very poorly sampled. Here we present a data set of distributed stream stage, streamflow, stream temperature, barometric pressure, and air temperature from the Tuolumne River Watershed in Yosemite National Park, Sierra Nevada, California, USA, for water years 2002–2015, as well as a quality-controlled hourly meteorological forcing time series for use in hydrologic modeling. We also provide snow data and daily inflow to the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir for 1970–2015. This paper describes data collected using low-visibility and low-impact installations for wilderness locations and can be used alone or as a critical supplement to ancillary data sets collected by cooperating agencies, referenced herein. This data set provides a unique opportunity to understand spatial patterns and scaling of hydroclimatic processes in complex terrain and can be used to evaluate downscaling techniques or distributed modeling. The paper also provides an example methodology and lessons learned in conducting hydroclimatic monitoring in remote wilderness.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Tuolumne River Watershed
                  -  Yosemite National Park
                  - california

View All **
707 A.2d 829

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Thurmon A. KNOX, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG), No. 4,

Sept. Term, 1998.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 23, 1998.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Thurmon A. Knox, Jr., to indefinitely suspend the Respondent from the practice of law.

This Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 23rd day of March, 1998

ORDERED that the Respondent, Thurmon A. Knox, Jr., be and he is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective on the 23rd day of March, 1998, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Thurmon A. Knox, Jr., from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the Clients’ Security *190Trust Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-713.
Order entered October 29, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00820-CV

BRIGHT EXCAVATION, INC., Appellant

V.

POGUE CONSTRUCTION CO., LP AND HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO.,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-00591

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 25, 2018 second unopposed motion for extension 

of time to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than 

November 19, 2018. We caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of § 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of § 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Mobile PET Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAUL J. CROWE                                             
|                                                              
|Paul J. Crowe, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: February 12, 2003



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS H. INSLEY                     
|                                         
|Thomas H. Insley, Chief Financial Officer



Dated: February 12, 2003



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of § 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Banco de Chile



|1. | Banchile Administradora General de Fondos S.A.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------



|2. | Banchile Factoring S.A.
|-- | -----------------------



|3. | Banchile Corredores de Seguros Limitada
|-- | ---------------------------------------



|4. | Banchile Corredores de Bolsa S.A.
|-- | ---------------------------------



|5. | Banchile Asesoria Financiera S.A.
|-- | ---------------------------------



|6. | Banchile Securitizadora S.A.
|-- | ----------------------------



|7. | Promarket S.A.
|-- | --------------



|8. | Socofin S.A.
|-- | ------------



|9. | Banchile Trade Services Limited
|-- | -------------------------------



|10. | Citibank Agencia de Valores S.A.
|--- | --------------------------------

With the exception of Banchile Trade
Services Limited, which was incorporated in Hong Kong, all of the subsidiaries numerated above have their jurisdiction of incorporation in the Republic of Chile.



1
Giancarlo Anthony CAMERON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-0009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

22995

Vol. 62, No. 81

Monday, April 28, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 622

[Docket No. 970415091-7091-01;I.D.

033197D]

RIN 0648-AJ88

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of

Mexico, and South Atlantic; Snapper

Grouper Fishery Off the Southern

Atlantic States; Black Sea Bass Pot

Fishery; Control Date

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–10539

beginning on page 19732 in the issue of

Wednesday, April 23, 1997 make the

following corrections:

1. On page 19732, in the third

column, in the SUMMARY, in the

seventh line from the bottom, ‘‘[insert

date of publication in the Federal

Register]’’ should read ‘‘April 23, 1997’’.

2. On page 19733, in the first column,

in the last paragraph, in the fifth line,

‘‘[insert date of publication in the

Federal Register]’’ should read ‘‘April

23, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 413

[BPD–808–P]

RIN 0938–AG70

Medicare and Medicaid Programs;

Salary Equivalency Guidelines for

Physical Therapy, Respiratory

Therapy, Speech Language Pathology,

and Occupational Therapy Services

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–7477,

beginning on page 14851 in the issue of

Friday, March 28, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 14862, in the table, in the

seventh column, in the ninth line,

‘‘35.5’’ should read ‘‘35.52’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection

Correction

In notice document 97–9704

beginning on page 18360 in the issue of

Tuesday, April 15, 1997 make the

following correction:

On page 18360, in the first column, in

the DATES section, ‘‘April 15, 1997’’

should read ‘‘May 15, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 8

[CGD 96-055]

RIN 2115-AF37

Streamlined Inspection Program

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–8509

beginning on page 17008 in the issue of

Tuesday April 8, 1997 make the

following correction:

On page 17010, Illustration (1) --

Application to OCMI was duplicated on

page 17011.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D