95226 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 

Alere Toxicology Services, 450 

Southlake Blvd., Richmond, VA 

23236, 804–378–9130. (Formerly: 

Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc., 

Scientific Testing Laboratories, Inc.; 

Kroll Scientific Testing Laboratories, 

Inc.) 

Clinical Reference Laboratory, Inc., 8433 

Quivira Road, Lenexa, KS 66215– 

2802, 800–445–6917. 

Desert Tox, LLC, 5425 E Bell Rd., Suite 

125, Scottsdale, AZ 85254, 602–457– 

5411/623–748–5045. 

DrugScan, Inc., 200 Precision Road, 

Suite 200, Horsham, PA 19044, 800– 

235–4890. 

Dynacare *, 245 Pall Mall Street, 

London, ONT, Canada N6A 1P4, 519– 

679–1630. (Formerly: GammaDynacare Medical Laboratories) 

ElSohly Laboratories, Inc., 5 Industrial 

Park Drive, Oxford, MS 38655, 662– 

236–2609. 

LabOne, Inc. d/b/a Quest Diagnostics, 

10101 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS 

66219, 913–888–3927/800–873–8845. 

(Formerly: Quest Diagnostics 

Incorporated; LabOne, Inc.; Center for 

Laboratory Services, a Division of 

LabOne, Inc.) 

Laboratory Corporation of America, 

1225 NE 2nd Ave., Portland, OR 

97232, 503–413–5295/800–950–5295. 

(Formerly: Legacy Laboratory Services 

Toxicology MetroLab) 

Laboratory Corporation of America 

Holdings, 7207 N Gessner Road, 

Houston, TX 77040, 713–856–8288/ 

800–800–2387. 

Laboratory Corporation of America 

Holdings, 69 First Ave., Raritan, NJ 

08869, 908–526–2400/800–437–4986. 

(Formerly: Roche Biomedical 

Laboratories, Inc.) 

Laboratory Corporation of America 

Holdings, 1904 TW Alexander Drive, 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 

919–572–6900/800–833–3984. 

(Formerly: LabCorp Occupational 

Testing Services, Inc., CompuChem 

Laboratories, Inc. 

CompuChem Laboratories, Inc., A 

Subsidiary of Roche Biomedical 

Laboratory; Roche CompuChem 

Laboratories, Inc., A Member of the 

Roche Group), Laboratory Corporation 

of America Holdings, 1120 Main 

Street, Southaven, MS 38671, 866– 

827–8042/800–233–6339. (Formerly: 

LabCorp Occupational Testing 

Services, Inc.; MedExpress/National 

Laboratory Center) 

MedTox Laboratories, Inc., 402 W 

County Road D, St. Paul, MN 55112, 

651–636–7466/800–832–3244. 

Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center, Forensic Toxicology 

Laboratory, 1 Veterans Drive, 

Minneapolis, MN 55417, 612–725– 

2088. Testing for Veterans Affairs 

(VA) Employees Only. 

Omega Laboratories, Inc.*, 2150 

Dunwin Drive, Unit 1 & 2, 

Mississauga, ON, Canada L5L 5M8, 

289–919–3188. 

Pacific Toxicology Laboratories, 9348 

DeSoto Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311, 

800–328–6942. (Formerly: Centinela 

Hospital Airport Toxicology 

Laboratory) 

Phamatech, Inc., 15175 Innovation 

Drive, San Diego, CA 92128, 888– 

635–5840. 

US Army Forensic Toxicology Drug 

Testing Laboratory, 2490 Wilson St., 

Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755– 

5235, 301–677–7085. Testing for 

Department of Defense (DoD) 

Employees Only 

* The Standards Council of Canada 

(SCC) voted to end its Laboratory 

Accreditation Program for Substance 

Abuse (LAPSA) effective May 12, 1998. 

Laboratories certified through that 

program were accredited to conduct 

forensic urine drug testing as required 

by U.S. Department of Transportation 

(DOT) regulations. As of that date, the 

certification of those accredited 

Canadian laboratories continued under 

DOT authority. The responsibility for 

conducting quarterly performance 

testing plus periodic on-site inspections 

of those LAPSA-accredited laboratories 

was transferred to the U.S. HHS, with 

the HHS’ NLCP contractor continuing to 

have an active role in the performance 

testing and laboratory inspection 

processes. Other Canadian laboratories 

wishing to be considered for the NLCP 

may apply directly to the NLCP 

contractor just as U.S. laboratories do. 

Upon finding a Canadian laboratory to 

be qualified, HHS will recommend that 

DOT certify the laboratory as meeting 

the minimum standards of the current 

Mandatory Guidelines published in the 

Federal Register. After receiving DOT 

certification, the laboratory will be 

included in the monthly list of HHScertified laboratories and participate in 

the NLCP certification maintenance 

program. DOT established this process 

in July 1996 (61 FR 37015) to allow 

foreign laboratories to participate in the 

DOT drug testing program. 

Anastasia D. Flanagan, 

Public Health Advisor, Division of Workplace 

Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28147 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

In compliance with section 

3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 concerning 

opportunity for public comment on 

proposed collections of information, the 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration (SAMHSA) 

will publish periodic summaries of 

proposed projects. To request more 

information on the proposed projects or 

to obtain a copy of the information 

collection plans, call the SAMHSA 

Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276– 

0361. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collections of information 

are necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information; (c) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Proposed Project: 988 Suicide & Crisis 

Lifeline and Crisis Services Program 

Evaluation—New Package 

The Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration 

(SAMHSA) 988 & Behavioral Health 

Crisis Coordinating Office (BHCCO)) is 

requesting clearance for the new data 

collection associated with the 

evaluation of the SAMHSA 988 Suicide 

and Crisis Lifeline and Crisis Services 

Program Evaluation (988 Suicide and 

Crisis Lifeline Evaluation). The 

collection of this information is critical 

to successfully oversee operational 

response and quality of service through 

the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline to 

ensure connections to care for 

individuals in suicidal crisis or 

emotional distress contacting in for 988 

phone, chat, and text support for 

connecting local, state/territory, and 

national outcomes and monitoring 

contractual obligations for current and 

future 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline 

grant programs. Much of the 

information is already embedded in the 

current 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 95227 

network administrator grants, the 988 

state and territory grant program, or the 

988 Tribal Response grant program. 

In 2020, Congress designated the 

three-digit number, 9–8–8 for the 

Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and the 

Suicide and Crisis Lifeline transitioned 

to the 3-digit number in July 2022. As 

a part of the federal government’s 

commitment to addressing the mental 

health and opioid crises in America, 

unprecedented Federal resources have 

been invested to expand crisis centers in 

support of 988. Since its launch in July 

2022, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 

has answered over 9.6 million contacts 

(SAMHSA, 2024). Progress recognized 

in 2023 continues in all areas including 

crisis line features, crisis center 

supports, and funding. In FY2024, the 

Biden-Harris administration 

appropriated nearly $500 million in 

new funding opportunities for the 988 

Lifeline Administrator and other 

grantees on State territorial, Tribal and 

center levels, as part of the commitment 

to strengthen crisis care nationally. In 

section 1103(a)(2)(B) of the 

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 

(Pub. L. 117–328), Congress called for 

enhanced program evaluation, including 

performance measures to assess program 

response and improve readiness and 

performance of the service, including 

review of each contact to ensure timely 

connection of service and quality 

provision in line with evidence-based 

care. To meet the standards and 

requirements set forth in the statute, 

ongoing communication of key 

outcomes within this OMB request must 

be received and reviewed to ensure 

connection and quality of care through 

the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. 

The information collected will be 

used by SAMHSA to conduct an 

evaluation of the 988 Suicide & Crisis 

Lifeline and Crisis Services, to ensure 

individuals in suicidal, mental health 

and/or substance use crisis can contact 

988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline and are 

connected to crisis centers providing 

evidence-based care and are able to 

receive critical resource referral and 

linkage, including opportunities for 

mobile crisis support, crisis receiving 

and stabilizing facilities, peer respite 

centers and withdrawal management 

services. The purpose of the 988 Lifeline 

and Crisis Services Program Evaluation 

is to assess the implementation and 

expansion of the 988 Lifeline in the U.S. 

The evaluation will provide SAMHSA, 

grantees, and other interested parties 

with the information needed to 

strengthen the Behavioral Health Crisis 

Services Continuum (BHCSC) for all 

people in crisis. The evaluation utilizes 

multiple studies to conduct the 

evaluation of the 988 Lifeline and Crisis 

Services across a 5-year period. The 988 

Lifeline and Crisis Services Program 

Evaluation includes three levels: 

system-level, client-level, and impact. 

Embedded within each of the three 

evaluation levels are inquiries into 

behavioral health equity to investigate 

disparities in utilization of 988 Lifeline 

and BHCSC services and outcomes. 

The System-level Evaluation 

examines the characteristics, 

collaborations, and structures of the 

crisis services infrastructure within 

states, territories, and Tribal 

jurisdictions that support improved 

client outcomes. The Systems-level 

Evaluation includes two studies: the 

System Composition and Collaboration 

Study and the System-Level Service 

Utilization Study. The System 

Composition and Collaboration Study 

examines the structure of the 988 

Lifeline and the BHCSC at the national, 

state, territory, and Tribal levels, and 

the extent to which crisis service 

agencies work together. The Systemlevel Service Utilization Study 

investigates whether the 988 Lifeline 

and BHCSC are successful in creating a 

behavioral-health-system-first response 

to crisis events and the resulting 

reduction in use of non-behavioral 

health crisis services (e.g., 911, law 

enforcement, emergency medical 

services). 

The Client-level Evaluation provides 

critical information about the ways in 

which the 988 Lifeline and crisis 

services fulfill their mission to connect 

those in crisis with the services and 

supports needed to reduce crisis risk 

and improve overall behavioral health 

outcomes. The Client-level Evaluation 

consists of two studies: The Client-level 

Service Utilization and Outcome Study 

and the Client-level Risk Reduction 

Study. The Client-Level Service 

Utilization and Outcome Study explores 

the effectiveness of 988 Lifeline and 

BHCSCs in linking individuals to 

referral services following their contact 

with the crisis system and assesses the 

relationship between engagement with 

crisis services and behavioral health 

outcomes. The Client-Level Risk 

Reduction Study assesses the efficacy of 

988 Lifeline and BHSCS contacts on 

immediate reductions in risks of 

suicide, violence toward others, and 

overdose. 

The Impact Evaluation informs 

SAMHSA’s efforts to continue to build 

the evidence base for suicide prevention 

and crisis programming. Specifically, 

this evaluation will examine the impact 

of 988 Lifeline and BHCSC on suicide 

and overdose morbidity and mortality. 

A quasi-experimental interrupted time 

series (ITS) design using extant, 

secondary data sources (e.g., CDC 

mortality data, Medicaid claims data, 

data from Healthcare Cost and 

Utilization Project (HCUP), data from 

the NSDUH, and SAMHSA’s 

Performance and Accountability 

Reporting System [SPARS] data) 

gathered across multiple years to 

establish longitudinal state-level trends 

before and after major milestones in the 

implementation of the 988 Lifeline and 

BHCSC. 

The 988 Lifeline and Crisis Services 

Program Evaluation engages with the 

following SAMHSA grant-funded 

programs that make up the core of the 

crisis care continuum: 988 State/ 

Territory; 988 Tribal nations; 

Community Crisis Response Program 

(CCRP); Crisis Center Follow-Up 

(CCFU); 988 Administrator; and 

Certified Community Behavioral Health 

Clinics (CCBHCs). Additional grant 

programs which are relevant to the 

BHCSC, such as the Mental Health 

Services Block Grant (MHBG), State 

Opioid Response (SOR), Tribal Opioid 

Response (TOR), Substance Use 

Prevention, Treatment and Recovery 

Services Block Grant (SUPTRS BG), will 

be included in portions of the 

evaluation as relevant. In addition, 

crisis-providing organizations that are 

not SAMHSA grantees, especially 

mobile crisis programs, crisis 

stabilization units, and CCBHCs will 

also be engaged to participate in the 

evaluation. 

Ultimately, the purpose of the 

SAMHSA 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 

and Crisis Services Program is to build 

the program’s knowledge base of 

effectiveness by thoroughly describing 

the implementation, outcomes, and 

impact of a program meant to reduce 

deaths by suicide. 

The total annualized burden is an 

estimated 16,724 respondents for the 

988 Lifeline and Crisis Services Program 

Evaluation instruments, with a 

combined hourly estimate to be 8,006.10 

hours. Burden estimates are based on 

the data collection requirements and the 

number of respondents. The estimated 

response burden to collect this 

information associated with the 988 

Lifeline and Crisis Services Program 

Evaluation is as follows annualized over 

the requested 3-year clearance period is 

presented below: 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
95228 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2024 / Notices 

TOTAL ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS

[Across the 3-year clearance period] 

Type of respondent Instrument 

Number of 

respondents 

per year 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

number of 

responses 

Burden per 

response 

(hours) 

Annual 

burden 

(hours) 

Hourly 

wage 

rate 

($) 

Total 

annualized 

cost 

($) 

System Composition and Collaboration Study 

Organizational Staff/Crisis System 

Administrator 1.

SIS ........................ 73 1 73 0.75 54.75 $78.06 $4,273.79 

Organizational Staff/Crisis Agency 

Manager 2.

CCPS ................... 1034 1 1034 1.00 1,034.00 58.80 60,799.20 

Organizational Staff/Crisis Agency 

Staff 3.

KII–CS .................. 35 1 35 1.00 35.00 27.46 961.10 

Organizational Staff/Crisis Agency 

Staff 3.

KII–CS–CSS ......... 13 1 13 0.50 6.50 27.46 178.49 

Client-Level Service Utilization and Outcome Study 

Organizational Staff/Crisis Agency 

Staff 3.

CCDF ................... 6,000 1 6,000 0.15 900.00 27.46 24,714.00 

Parents/Caregivers 4 ....................... CCDF Parent Supplement.

5 1,560 1 1,560 0.10 156.00 7.25 1,131.00 

Client 4 ............................................ CES—Baseline ..... 6,000 1 6,000 0.75 4,500.00 7.25 32,625.00 

Client 4 ............................................ CES—3 months ... 1,500 1 1,500 0.65 975.00 7.25 7,068.75 

Client 4 ............................................ CES—6 months ... 375 1 375 0.65 243.75 7.25 1,767.19 

Client 4 ............................................ CES—12 months 94 1 94 0.65 61.10 7.25 442.98 

Client-Level Risk Reduction Study 

Client 4 ............................................ C–KII–DC ............. 30 1 30 1.00 30.00 7.25 217.50 

Client 4 ............................................ C–KII–TPC ........... 10 1 10 1.00 10.00 7.25 72.50 

Total ........................................ ............................... 16,724 ........................ .................... .................... 8,006.10 .................... 134,251.49 

1BLS OES May 2022 National Industry-Specific Occupation Employment and Wage Estimates mean hourly salary for General and Operations Managers (code 11– 

1021), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes111021.htm. 2BLS OES May 2022 National Industry-Specific Occupation Employment and Wage Estimates mean hourly salary for Social and Community Service Managers 

(code 11–9151), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes119151.htm. 3BLS OES May 2022 National Industry-Specific Occupation Employment and Wage Estimates mean hourly salary for Counselors, Social Workers, and Other Community and Social Service Specialists (code 21–1000), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics5_541720.htm#29-0000. 4 https://www.usa.gov/minimum-wage. 

5This number represents an estimate based on the average distribution of monthly contacts by modality, cited in Lifeline Performance Metrics (SAMHSA, April 

2024), and assumes that 40% of all individuals who contact 988 through chat or text (as cited in Gould et al., 2021 and Pisani et al., 2022) and 20% of those who 

contact 988 through phone call are below the age of 18. 

Send comments to SAMHSA Reports 

Clearance Officer, 5600 Fisher Lane, 

Room 15E45, Rockville, MD 20852 OR 

email a copy at samhsapra@

samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments 

should be received by January 31, 2025. 

Alicia Broadus, 

Public Health Advisor. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28136 Filed 11–29–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Immigration and Customs 

Enforcement 

[OMB Control Number 1653–0042] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Extension, Without Change, 

of a Currently Approved Collection: 

Obligor Change of Address 

AGENCY: U.S. Immigration and Customs 

Enforcement, Department of Homeland 

Security. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 

the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs 

Enforcement (ICE) will submit the 

following Information Collection 

Request (ICR) to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance. This information 

collection was previously published in 

the Federal Register on September 18, 

2024, allowing for a 60-day comment 

period. ICE received one unrelated 

comment. The purpose of this notice is 

to allow an additional 30 days for public 

comments. The burden was updated 

from the 60-day notice due to 

adjustments in the Agency estimates. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until January 2, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of the publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

specific question related to collection 

activities, please contact Carl Albritton, 

ERO, (202–497–6755), carl.a.albritton@

ice.dhs.gov, U.S. Immigration and 

Customs Enforcement. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agencies estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1