alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 162 (Friday, August 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 50849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20724]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 9932-99-Region 3]

Notice of Administrative Settlement Agreement Pursuant to Section 
122(H) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980, as Amended

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), notice is hereby given 
that a proposed administrative settlement agreement for recovery of 
response costs (``Proposed Agreement'') associated with the Lin 
Electric Superfund Site, Bluefield, Mercer County, West Virginia 
(``Site'') was executed by the Environmental Protection Agency 
(``EPA'') and is now subject to public comment, after which EPA may 
modify or withdraw its consent if comments received disclose facts or 
considerations that indicate that the Proposed Agreement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Proposed Agreement would 
resolve potential EPA claims under Section 107(a) of CERCLA, against 
Danny E. Lusk and Gordon M. Lusk, (``Settling Parties''). The Proposed 
Agreement would require Settling Parties to reimburse EPA $21,358.00 
for response costs incurred by EPA for the Site.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the Proposed 
Agreement. EPA's response to any comments received will be available 
for public inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before thirty (30) days after 
the date of publication of this notice.

ADDRESSES: The Proposed Agreement and additional background information 
relating to the Proposed Agreement are available for public inspection 
at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch 
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. A copy of the Proposed Agreement may be 
obtained from Robin E. Eiseman (3RC41), Senior Assistant Regional 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, PA 19103. Comments should reference the ``Lin Electric 
Superfund Site, Proposed Settlement Agreement'' and ``EPA Docket No. 
CERC-03-2015-0182CR,'' and should be forwarded to Robin E. Eiseman at 
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin E. Eiseman (3RC41), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 
19103, Phone: (215) 814-2612; eiseman.robin@epa.gov.

    Dated: August 17, 2015.
Karen Melvin,
Acting Director, Hazardous Site Cleanup Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2015-20724 Filed 8-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
I,  JAMES  C.  FIELDS,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LocatePlus Holdings
Corporation  for  the  period  ended  December  31,  2006.

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant  and  we  have:

     (A)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

     (B)   evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

     (C)   presented  in  this  annual  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as  of  the  Evaluation  Date;

5.   The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

     (A)   all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

     (B)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.


               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Interim  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

               May 1,  2007
TS-EMLA40 

Attachment #8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End 

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the 

New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1467

In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 2:20

- cv - 00474

- RAJ )

Submitted : June 29, 2021 Decided: July 1, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition

. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to grant his unconditional release

. Mandamus relief is a dra stic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. The present record does not reveal undue delay or obstruction by the district court. Moreover , i nsofar as Johnson seeks an ord er directing the district court to grant substantive relief, Johnson has not demonstrated a clear right to such relief

. A ccordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Nova Biogenetics, Inc. hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge that:

         1. The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for
         the annual period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: October 13, 2006                  /s/ Chene Gardner
                                        -----------------
                                        Chene Gardner
RIVERGOLD, INC., Appellant, v. PAYROLL MANAGEMENT, INC./COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. /COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT, INC., and Mariana Costilla, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0411

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
WILLIE FLOYD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0016

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 18, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

Willie Floyd, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Solimar RODRIGUEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jose R. CASTILLO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2476

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_publications(4)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1984        Wilderness mineral potential: Assessment of mineral-resource potential in U.S. Forest Service lands studied in 1964-1984: Volume 1

publication        September 26, 2013        Design tradeoffs for trend assessment in aquatic biological monitoring programs

publication        May 27, 2013        Frequent cross-species transmission of parvoviruses among diverse carnivore hosts

publication        January 1, 2004        Collection, analysis, and age-dating of sediment cores from 56 U.S. lakes and reservoirs sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992-2001
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-22359]



 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

 Indian Health Service


 Request for Public Comment: 60-Day Proposed Information 
Collection: Indian Health Service Background Investigations of 
Individuals in Positions Involving Regular Contact With or Control Over 
Indian Children, OPM-306

Correction

    In notice document E8-22359 beginning on page 55122 in the issue 
ofWednesday, September 24, 2008, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 55122, in the third column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the 12th line ``IRS'' should read ``IHS''.
    2. On page 55123, in the first column, in the third full paragraph, 
seven lines from the bottom ``IRS'' should read ``IHS''.

[FR Doc. Z8-22359 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  March 11, 2008 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 1024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 107 and 108

[Docket No. 28745; Amendment Nos. 107-9 and 108-14]
RIN 2120-AG27

Falsification of Security Records

Correction

    In rule document 96-30776 beginning on page 64242 in the issue of 
Tuesday, December 3, 1996 make the following correction:
    On page 64243, in the first column, in the third full paragraph, in 
the first line, ``FDA'' should read ``FAA''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 27293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97D-0148]


International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guideline on 
Impurities: Residual Solvents; Availability

Correction

    In notice document 97-11439 beginning on page 24302 in the issue of 
Friday, May 2, 1997 make the following correction:
    On page 24308, the third equation is corrected to read:

                                                                                                                
                                                 50.7 mg kg<SUP>-1 day<SUP>-1  x  50 kg                                   
                   PDE=                   -----------------------------------------        =4.22 mg day<SUP>-1       
                                                 12  x  10  x  5  x  1  x  1                                    
                                                                                                                

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40734

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACQUELINE MARTIN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CR-140-1

- - - - - - - - - -

May 8, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jacqueline Martin appeals her jury conviction for interstate

transportation of stolen securities and uttering forged

securities. She argues that the district court erred in denying

her motion to suppress statements made without the presence of

her attorney, who represented her on charged state offenses,

during an interview by federal agents concerning uncharged

federal offenses because the state and federal offenses were 
No. 95-40734

-2-

inextricably intertwined. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. For essentially the reasons given by the

district court, there was no error in the denial of the motion to

suppress Martin's statements. United States v. Martin, No. 1:94-

CR-140-1 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 1995).

 AFFIRMED.
Lucas Anthony ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 7, 2018

Lucas Anthony Roberts, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal seeking an appeal of the order dismissing defendant's amended motion for postconviction relief, rendered January 23, 2018, is denied on the merits. Insofar as Petitioner appears to also seek a belated appeal of the denial of his original motion for postconviction relief, this disposition is without prejudice to Petitioner filing a separate petition for belated appeal, which shall include appropriate facts constituting entitlement to a belated appeal of this order. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(F).

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4736 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4736

  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                   certain properties in New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2016

Mr. MacArthur introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                   certain properties in New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROPERTIES IN NEW JERSEY FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE 
              COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall revise one or 
more maps included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to John H. Chafee 
Coastal Barrier Resources System Unit NJ-04B in New Jersey, as 
necessary to remove from such system the properties located at the 
following postal addresses:
            (1) 112 W. Mantoloking Drive, Brick, NJ 08723.
            (2) 110 W. Mantoloking Drive, Brick, NJ, 08723.
            (3) 108 W. Mantoloking Drive, Brick, NJ 08723.
            (4) 106 W. Mantoloking Drive, Brick, NJ 08723.
            (5) 104 W. Mantoloking Drive, Brick, NJ 08723.
            (6) 101 W. Mantoloking Drive, Brick, NJ 08723.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep each 
map revised under subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12.1



Annual Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Banco de Chile (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 25, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 



|Date: June 25, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Orlando NOA, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. SC17-738

Supreme Court of Florida.

[July 5, 2018]

Paul B. Feltman of Alvarez, Feltman & DaSilva, P.L., Coral Gables, Florida, for Petitioner

Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, Florida, for Respondent

PER CURIAM.

*61We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in *Noa v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n* , 215 So.3d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), based on express and direct conflict. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, J., dissents.