alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5040 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5040

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase for 2 years the 
residential energy credit and the investment tax credit with respect to 
  solar property with a nameplate capacity of less than 20 kilowatts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2016

  Mr. Polis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase for 2 years the 
residential energy credit and the investment tax credit with respect to 
  solar property with a nameplate capacity of less than 20 kilowatts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solar Expansion of Distributed 
Generation Exponentially Act'' or the ``Solar EDGE Act''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR INCREASE FOR CERTAIN SOLAR PROPERTY EXPENDITURES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 25D of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(9) Two-year increase for certain solar property 
        expenditures.--In the case of qualified solar electric property 
        expenditures for taxable years beginning during 2017 or 2018 
        with respect to property which has a nameplate capacity of less 
        than 20 kilowatts (or thermal energy equivalent), subsection 
        (a)(1) shall be applied by substituting `50 percent' for `the 
        applicable percentage'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.

SEC. 3. TWO-YEAR INCREASE FOR CERTAIN SOLAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 48 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Two-year increase for certain solar property.--In the 
        case of property--
                    ``(A) described in subsection (a)(3)(A)(i),
                    ``(B) the construction of which begins during 2017 
                or 2018, and
                    ``(C) which has a nameplate capacity of less than 
                20 kilowatts (or thermal energy equivalent),
        the energy percentage shall be 50 percent.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property construction of which begins after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology, 1918      

      January 1, 1918    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Case 20-20403-LMI Doc 53 Filed 07/15/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-20403-LMI Doc 53 Filed 07/15/21 Page 2 of 2
George Andrew FOUNTAIN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-272

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
March 24, 2015

Brian Zamudio

Persistence Mining, Inc.

5666 La Jolla Boulevard, Suite 315

La Jolla, CA 92037

Dear Mr. Zamudio:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your March 4, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Persistence Mining, Inc. into 

the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0566), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10505]



Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 86/Tuesday, May 5, 1998 / Corrections

[[Page 24843]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[Docket No. OR-1-0001; FRL-5852-3]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants: Oregon

Correction

    In rule document 97-18082, beginning on page 36995, in the issue of 
Thursday, July 10, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 62.9505  [Corrected]

    On page 36997, in the third column, in the undesignated center 
heading, in the third line ``Frp,'' should read ``From''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          100808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   233298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     662482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1040171
<PP&E>                                         1762641
<DEPRECIATION>                                   83032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3050845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1602205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        451
<COMMON>                                           468
<OTHER-SE>                                     4630929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3050845
<SALES>                                         194558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                194558
<CGS>                                           119219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   119219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                671281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (17498)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (613440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (613440)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 83 (Wednesday, April 30, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 23534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[IL 102-2; FRL-5532-3]

40 CFR Part 52


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Illinois: Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance

Correction

    In rule document 96-18758, beginning on page 38582 in the issue of 
Thursday, July 25, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 52.726  [Corrected]

    On page 38590, in the first column, in Sec. 52.726, the paragraph 
designation ``(j)'' should read ``(m)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - iowa(1)

## By Year

Photography        June 1, 2022        Asteroid.png

Photography        March 25, 2022        Asteroid-Earth.jpg

Photography        June 1, 2022        Figure showing the potential dispersal of asteroid outfall from an impact in Colorado.

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, U, Face, PG county, MD

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, U, Side, PG county, MD

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, F, Face, MD, Charles Co

Photography        December 17, 2019        Andrena asteroides, F, Side, MD, Charles Co

Photography        April 6, 2023        TitusAtTheUN-VIE.png

Satellite imagery        September 26, 2022        Dimorphos Nomenclature

Satellite imagery        September 26, 2022        Didymos Nomenclature

Photography        September 20, 2005        Decorah, Iowa

Photography        April 25, 2021        Landsat 8 Collection 2 image of the Richat Structure

Satellite imagery        April 19, 2019        Re-Entry

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff

Illustrations        August 26, 2012        Vesta Dawn Framing Camera

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic
ENTRY ORDER

SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2014-169

MAY TERM, 2014

State of Vermont } APPEALED FROM:

}

}

 v. } Superior Court, Windsor Unit,

} Criminal Division

Luke Theriault }

} DOCKET NO. 443-4-14 Wrcr

In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

Defendant appeals pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b) from the denial of his motion to strike 

from his conditions of release a twenty-four hour curfew. Defendant was arraigned on April 23 

in Docket 436-4-14Wrcr for Reckless Endangerment and Possession of Cocaine (less than 2.5 

grams), both charged as misdemeanors. Conditions of release were set. On April 25th he was 

charged in Docket 443-4-14Wrcr with violating one of his conditions of release by possessing 

marijuana. A twenty-four hour curfew was imposed. Following a hearing on defendant’s motion 

to amend conditions of his release on May 12, 2014, the Superior Court, Windsor Criminal 

Division imposed a twenty-four hour curfew in both dockets subject to the following exceptions: 

“legal, medical, verifiable employment, or pick up/drop off of your children on [T]uesdays at the 

[C]umberland [F]arms in [W]ilder and you may be out of your residence on Tuesdays and 

Thursdays from 12pm-5pm.” On May 16, 2014, defendant filed an appeal of this condition. 

This matter was heard by this Court on May 29, 2014.

Under § 7556(b), any order concerning conditions of release “shall be affirmed if it is 

supported by the proceedings below. If the order is not supported, . . . [a] single justice hearing 

the matter may remand the case for a further hearing or may, with or without additional 

evidence, order the person released.”

From the transcript of the Motion to Amend Conditions of Release, it is apparent that the 

trial court relied heavily on the factual basis for the charge of reckless endangerment—which 

involved the discharge of a firearm—and defendant’s two failures to appear in connection with 

charges brought back in 2002 and 2003 and one violation of probation from 2004. 

Notwithstanding the court’s concern about defendant’s willingness to abide by court orders, the 

judge amended the curfew condition as detailed above. 

Given the legislature’s admonition found in 13 V.S.A. § 7554(a)(2) that a judicial officer 

should consider the least restrictive combination of conditions that will reasonably assure 

protection of the public, and that “a physically restrictive condition may only be imposed in 

extraordinary circumstances,” § 7554(a)(2)(D), I cannot find that the record below supports the
2

twenty-four hour curfew imposed, even as amended. His previous disregard of court orders 

occurred a decade ago. He is facing only misdemeanor charges. He has surrendered his firearms 

to law enforcement. I do not find these circumstances to be extraordinary. Therefore, I am 

amending the conditions of release for both dockets to require a curfew from 8:00 pm to 6:00 

am. This new curfew condition shall be in effect beginning on May 30, 2014. All other 

conditions of release imposed by the trial court remain in effect. 

FOR THE COURT:

Marilyn S. Skoglund, Associate Justice
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Ar/Ar geochronology

Filters

              - products_data(18)
              - products_publications(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - california(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Data Release        December 8, 2023        Field, Geochemical, Geochronological, and Magnetic Data from a Pliocene basalt flow along the Deschutes River in north-central Oregon

Data Release        April 12, 2018        Argon geochronology data from the Austroalpine-Pennine boundary, Central Alps, Switzerland

Data Release        July 20, 2023        Argon data for enriched MORB from the 8°20' N seamount chain

Data Release        December 13, 2023        U-Pb detrital zircon data and Ar feldspar data from middle Cenozoic sandstones and volcanic tuffs from southern Nevada, USA

Data Release        April 6, 2023        Quetrupillán Volcanic Complex, southern Chile: Argon age data and Pb, Sr, and Nd isotopic data

publication        January 1, 2016        U-Pb, Re-Os, and Ar/Ar geochronology of rare earth element (REE)-rich breccia pipes and associated host rocks from the Mesoproterozoic Pea Ridge Fe-REE-Au deposit, St. Francois Mountains, Missouri

Data Release        December 12, 2022        U-Pb and Ar-Ar age data and whole rock geochemistry data of igneous and metasedimentary rocks of northeast Afghanistan

Data Release        July 6, 2020        Argon data for Klamath Mountains

Data Release        June 4, 2020        Argon data for Central Anatolian Ophiolite

Data Release        June 19, 2020        Argon data for Amazon Craton

Data Release        June 19, 2020        Argon data for Central Andes (Domeyko Range, Chile)

Data Release        May 20, 2020        Argon data for Southern Patagonian Andes

Data Release        June 4, 2020        Argon data for Yellow Pine

Data Release        June 23, 2020        Argon data for Nepal

Data Release        April 16, 2020        Argon geochronology data for eastern Bhutan

Data Release        June 12, 2023        Digital data documenting the evolution of Miocene normal and dextral faulting in the lower Colorado River region near Blythe, California, USA

Data Release        May 24, 2018        40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Tonopah, Divide, and Goldfield districts, Nevada

Data Release        January 25, 2021        Geochemical and 40Ar/39Ar Analytical Data of Rocks from Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve

publication        January 1, 2011        Exhumation history of the NW Indian Himalaya revealed by fission track and 40Ar/39Ar ages

publication        October 19, 2019        Ar-Ar age constraints on the timing of Havre Trough opening and magmatism

Data Release        September 18, 2020        40Ar/39Ar Isotopic Data and Ages for Rocks from the Yukon-Tanana Upland of Eastern Alaska and the Northern Aleutian Range of South-Central Alaska
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,

Respondent

v.

LISA COLTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 286 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re:

SALOMON CHOCRON Case No..: 21-19627-SMG

Chapter 7

Debtor /

TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CLAIMED EXEMPTIONS

Trustee Sonya Salkin Slott (“Trustee”), by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby 

files this Objection to Claimed Exemptions (“Objection”) of the chapter 7 debtor, Salomon 

Chocron (“Debtor”). 

General Background

The Debtor initiated this bankruptcy case by filing a Chapter 7 petition for relief on October 

4, 2021 (the “Petition Date”). The Trustee was thereafter appointed Chapter 7 trustee for this 

bankruptcy estate.

The current and operative iteration of Schedule C is contained at ECF #1 (the “Initial

Schedules”), and all the specific objections set forth below are directed to exemptions asserted 

therein.

The Claimed Exemptions at Issue

The Objection is directed to the asset(s) described by the Debtor as:

1. “Household Goods and Furnishings- Owned TBE with non-filing spouse. See 

attached inventory” from Schedule A/B, line item 6 (“Household Goods”): the Debtor values the 

Household Goods at $8,045.00. The Debtor claims the Household Goods as exempt pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §522(b)(3)(B) owned as TBE with non-filing spouse.

Case 21-19627-SMG Doc 20 Filed 12/09/21 Page 1 of 3
2. “Keyko Technolgies, LLC” (“Keyko”): the Debtor values the stock in Keyko as 

unknown and claims 100% as exempt pursuant to Florida Constitutional personal property 

exemption. 

Objections

3. The Trustee objects to the claim of TBE in the Household Goods based on the 

existence of joint debt. On Schedule F, Line 2.1, the Debtor discloses $33,686.63 in debt to the 

IRS owed for 2018 personal income taxes of the Debtor and his non-filing spouse, Celina Chocron. 

See, e.g., In re Monzon, 214 B.R. 38, 41 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1997); In re Helm, Case No. 11-18801-

BKC-EPK, 2012 WL 1616791 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. May 9, 2012); In re Schwartz, 362 B.R. 532, 535 

(Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2007) (“It is possible for a bankruptcy trustee to reach tenancy by the entireties 

property to the extent of joints debts of both spouses ...”).

4. The Trustee does not object to the Debtor’s use of the Florida Constitutional 

personal property exemption to exempt part of the value of the Keyko stock but requests that the 

schedules be amended to clarify that the Debtor is only able to utilize the remaining $325.00 of 

the Florida Constitutional personal property exemption. The Trustee continues to investigate the 

value of the Debtor’s interest in the Keyko stock. 

5. The Trustee reserves all her rights to amend or supplement the above-stated 

objections as may be warranted by developments in this case.

By: /s/ Mark Bonacquisti, Esq.

Mark Bonacquisti, Esq.

FLBN 0703257

mark@msbankrupt.com

By: /s/ Zachary Malnik, Esq.

Zachary Malnik, Esq.

FLBN 1010272

zachary@msbankrupt.com

Case 21-19627-SMG Doc 20 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 3
The Salkin Law Firm

PO Box 15580

Plantation, FL 33318

954-423-4469

Case 21-19627-SMG Doc 20 Filed 12/09/21 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

In re: CASE NO. 20-11837-LMI 

 CHAPTER 13 

FRANKLIN FLOYD BALLOU 

ALIETTE MIRZA BALLOU, 

 

 

 Debtor. 

/ 

OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION 

U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF CHALET SERIES IV 

TRUST ("Secured Creditor"), by and through its undersigned attorney, objects to the Debtor`s 

Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan (DE 47)(the “Plan”) and to Confirmation of the Plan, and in 

support thereof states as follows: 

 1. Secured Creditor maintains a security interest in Debtor`s real property located at 

510 Pinecrest Drive, Miami, FL 33166. 

 2. Secured Creditor has timely filed Proof of Claim #3 in the amount of $411,579.85, 

with an arrearage of $160,570.29, and a post petition payment of $2,818.19. 

 3. The Debtor’s Plan includes payment of the pre-petition and post-petition amounts 

due to Secured Creditor, however, the total monthly Plan payment amount of $6,947.88 

beginning in month 16 of the Plan is not a feasible payment amount. Based on the Debtor’s filed 

Schedules I and J, the Debtor only has a monthly disposable income of $1,557.20, which is 

insufficient to make the proposed monthly Plan payment amounts. 

WHEREFORE, Secured Creditor, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

AS TRUSTEE OF CHALET SERIES IV TRUST, respectfully requests that this Court deny 

confirmation of the Debtors` proposed Chapter 13 Plan, and require the Debtors to amend the 

Case 20-11837-LMI Doc 50 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2
Plan to overcome Secured Creditor's objections as stated herein, conform to the entire amount 

due under Secured Creditor's Proof of Claim, and such other relief as the Court deems just and 

proper. 

Respectfully submitted, 

HOWARD LAW GROUP 

 /s/ Matthew Klein 

MATTHEW KLEIN 

FLORIDA BAR#: 73529 

4755 Technology Way, Suite 104 

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Telephone: 954-893-7874 

Fax: 888-235-0017 

Email: matthew@howardlawfl.com 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 8, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF System, which will send a notice of electronic 

filing to all CM/ECF participants: 

Christian. S. Diaz, Esq,. 9370 SW 72nd Street, Suite A110, Miami, FL 33173 

Nancy K. Neidich, Trustee, P.O. Box 279806, Miramar, FL 33027 

United States Trustee, 51 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 1204, Miami, FL 33130 

and a true and correct copy was mailed to the non-CM/ECF participants: 

Franklin Floyd Ballou and Aliette Mirza Ballou, 510 Pinecrest Drive, Miami, FL 33166 

/s/ Matthew Klein 

MATTHEW KLEIN 

FLORIDA BAR#: 73529 

Case 20-11837-LMI Doc 50 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 30816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ANM-20]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Livingston, MT, and Butte, MT, and 
Removal of Class E Airspace; Coopertown, MT

Correction

    In final rule document 98-14169 beginning on page 29103, in the 
issue of Thursday, May 28, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 29104, in the third column, under the heading ANM MT E5 
Livingston, MT [Revised], in the 20th line, ``112 deg.29'00''W;'' 
should read ``110 deg.29'00''W;''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 30, 2021.

Case 21-16804-AJC Doc 28 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-16804-AJC Doc 28 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-16804-AJC Doc 28 Filed 10/01/21 Page 3 of 3