alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 64 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 64 Filed 05/22/24 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 64 Filed 05/22/24 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1485

SUROVELL, JACKSON, COLTEN & DUGAN, PC,

Plaintiff,

THOMAS A. SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DAY INVESTMENTS, a/k/a Walter Douglas Day;

DOUGLAS DAY, a/k/a Walter Douglas Day,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-875-A)

Submitted: September 17, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before HALL, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Thomas A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears

Estabrook, III, Marion Elizabeth Erickson, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith

v. IRS, No. CA-95-875-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 1996). Because the issues

are not complex, we deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of

Counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: Case No. 21-15007-PDR

Chapter 11

STAMATIKE GLARENTZOS,

SSN: xxx-xx-5816

Debtor.

______________________________________/

ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTOR’S FIRST OBJECTION TO CLAIMS

This matter having been considered without hearing upon the Debtor’s Objection to Claim(s)

[ECF No. 43], and the objector by submitting this form order having represented that the objection

was served on the parties listed below, that the 30-day response time provided by Local Rule

3007-1(D) has expired, that no one listed below has filed, or served on the objector, a response to

the objection, and that the relief to be granted in this order is the identical relief requested in the

objection, and this Court having considered the basis for the objection to the claim, it is

ORDERED that Debtor’s objection(s) to the following claims are sustained:

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 4, 2021.

Case 21-15007-PDR Doc 62 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Claim holder Claim

No.

Disposition

American Express National

Bank

3 The objection is sustained and the claim shall be

disallowed and stricken.

U.S. Bank Trust, National

Association, as Trustee of

Bungalow Series IV Trust

c/o SN Servicing Corporation

4 The objection is sustained and the claim shall be

allowed as a secured claim in the total sum of

$1,200,000.00.

###

Submitted by:

Peter Spindel, Esq.

Attorney for Debtor

8306 Mills Dr. #458

Miami, FL 33183-4838

Tel/Tex: 305.799.5724

email: peterspindel@gmail.com

The party submitting the order shall serve a copy of the signed order on all required parties and

file with the court a certificate of service conforming with Local Rule 2002-1(F).

LF-25 (rev. 12/01/15)

###

3882.2101

\glarentzosS\/glarentzosS51.ord

Case 21-15007-PDR Doc 62 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(6)
              - tennessee(1)

## By Year

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Request Form

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cuttings Sampling Protocol

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Collection

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cores

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.6


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
CDK GLOBAL, INC. 2014 OMNIBUS AWARD PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) is made to the CDK Global, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Award Plan (the “Equity Plan”) effective as of this 18th day of January 2017. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have their respective meanings as set forth in the Equity Plan.


		
	1.
	Method of Exercise and Form of Payment. Section 7(d)(ii) is amended by adding the words “(up to the maximum rate)” at the end of the clause, such that Section 7(d)(ii) shall hereinafter read as follows:


“(ii) a “net exercise” procedure effected by withholding the minimum number of shares of Common Stock otherwise deliverable in respect of an Option that are needed to pay the Exercise Price and all applicable required withholding taxes (up to the maximum rate);”


		
	2.
	Tax Withholding. Section 14(d)(ii) is amended by deleting the words “(but no more than the minimum required statutory withholding liability)” and replacing them with “(up to the maximum statutory withholding amount permitted)” such that Section 14(d)(ii) shall hereinafter read as follows:


“(ii) Without limiting the generality of clause (i) above, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit a Participant to satisfy, in whole or in part, the foregoing withholding liability (up to the maximum statutory withholding amount permitted) by (A) the delivery of shares of Common Stock (which are not subject to any pledge or other security interest ) owned by the Participant having a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability or (B) having the Company withhold from the number of shares of Common Stock otherwise issuable or deliverable pursuant to the exercise or settlement of the Award a number of shares with a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability.”


		
	3.
	General. This Amendment shall not constitute a waiver, amendment or modification of any provision of the Equity Plan not expressly referred to herein. On and after the date hereof, each reference in the Equity Plan to “the Plan,” “herein,” “hereof,” “hereunder” or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Equity Plan as amended hereby. To the extent that a provision of this Amendment conflicts with or differs from a provision of the Equity Plan, such provision of this Amendment shall prevail and govern for all purposes and in all respects.


		
	4.
	Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware applicable to contracts made and performed wholly within the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Local changes in the gravity and magnetic field due to tectonic strain      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)

## By Year

Illustrations        December 31, 2019        Arizona Landsat State Mosaic
Exhibit 21.1

December 31, 2007

Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

(50.1% or
greater ownership)



|                                                  |  |               
|------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Legal Entity Name                                 |  | Inc./Org./Reg.
|Sunoco Partners LLC                               |  | Pennsylvania  
|Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.                    |  | Delaware      
|Sunoco Logistics Partners GP LLC                  |  | Delaware      
|Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations L.P.         |  | Delaware      
|Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations GP LLC       |  | Delaware      
|Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P.        |  | Texas         
|Sunoco Pipeline L.P.                              |  | Texas         
|Sun Pipe Line Services (Out) LLC                  |  | Delaware      
|Sunoco Partners Lease Acquisition & Marketing LLC |  | Delaware      
|Sunoco Pipeline Company of Delaware LLC.          |  | Delaware
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(4)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        January 26, 2017        PubTalk 1/2017 — Unusual sources of tsunamis

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(9)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(30)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(5)
              - hawaii(18)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(14)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 12, 2020        Climate Adaptation to Support Amphibian Conservation in U.S. Caribbean
Katherine TSAMASIROS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: the Matter of C.P., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0333

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 21-11633-BKC-RAM

CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

RAQUEL MONTENEGRO.

Debtor

 /

DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO CREDITOR, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS 

TRUSTEE FOR LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES 2006-GP4, 

NOTICE OF POST-PETITION MORTGAGE FEES, EXPENSES AND CHARGES

 

The Debtor, by and through her undersigned attorney, objects to creditor, U.S. Bank

National Association as Trustee for Lehman XS Trust, Series 2006-GP4's Notice of PostPetition Mortgage fees, expenses and charges and states:

1. This creditor has been provided with a copy of the Debtor’s insurance policy

from May of 2023 forward. Both the May and June portion of the insurance advances

should be stricken and disallowed and the total new amount will be paid directly to the

creditor.

2. The Debtor requests what the total amount is due after taking out the May

and June portions.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this

Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of this Objection to Claim was

emailed to Nancy Neidich, Trustee at e2c8f01@ch13herkert.com, April Harriott, Esquire at

aharriott@raslg.com, Keith Labell, counsel for U.S. Bank at klabell@raslg.com, John Steven Leinicke, counsel

for IRS at john.leinicke@usdoj.gov, Steven Powrozek counsel for Deutsche Bank at spowrozek@logs.com,

Christopher P. Salamopne, counsel for US Bank at csalamone@raslg.comand all others set forth in the NEF,

this 7th day of July 2023, and this Objection and an upcoming Notice of Hearing will be served on a

separate Certificate of Service via email to those set forth in the NEF and by regular mail to U.S. Bank

National Association, Attn: Andrew Cecere, CEO (U.S. Certified Mail) 425 Walnut Street, Cincinnati, OH

45202, PHH Mortgage Corp, Attn: Bankruptcy Dept., Post Office Box 24605, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-

4605 and PHH Mortgage Corp., Mailstop SBRP, Post Office Box 5469, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054.

Case 21-11633-RAM Doc 215 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Michael A. Frank

& Rodolfo H. De La Guardia, Jr.

Attorneys for the Debtors

2000 Northwest 89th Place, Suite 201

Doral, FL 33172

Telephone (305) 443-4217

Email- Pleadings@bkclawmiami.com

By: /s/ Michael A. Frank 

Michael A. Frank

Florida Bar No. 339075

Case 21-11633-RAM Doc 215 Filed 07/07/23 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Collectors Universe, Inc.

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-34554, No. 333-34556 and No. 333-34558 of Collectors Universe, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated September 5, 2000, relating to the financial
statements of Collectors Universe, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Collectors Universe, Inc. for
the year ended June 30, 2000.

         Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of
Collectors Universe, Inc. and subsidiaries, listed in Item 14. This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Costa Mesa, California
September 27, 2000
The PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Thomas Y. CROWE, individually, and TYC Management, Inc., Appellees.

Nos. 1D17-1964 1D17-2409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.4

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I,
E. Mark Rajkowski, Chief Financial Officer of MeadWestvaco Corporation, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of MeadWestvaco Corporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report

Date: April 20, 2015



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/ E. Mark Rajkowski                                 
|Name: E. Mark Rajkowski Title: Chief
Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60730

FRED COLE

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:05-CV-479

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Having reviewed the district court’s order, the parties’ briefs, and the

record and having heard oral argument, we affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the district court’s well-reasoned and comprehensive order.

AFFIRMED. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 12, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Page 1 of 2

MMM-LF-16 (rev. 04/01/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.: 22-10014 SMG

LORENZO ALLEN Chapter: 13

 

 Debtor(s) /

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPROVE FINAL MORTGAGE MODIFICATION 

AGREEMENT WITH PHH MORTGAGE, DE# 79

This matter came before the Court:

On the Debtor’s Ex Parte Motion to Approve Mortgage Modification 

Agreement with PHH Mortgage (“Lender”).

For hearing on ________________, upon Self-Represented Debtor’s 

Motion to Approve Mortgage Modification Agreement with Lender.

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 2, 2022.

Case 22-10014-SMG Doc 80 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

MMM-LF-16 (rev. 04/01/15)

The Court, having considered the motion and being otherwise fully advised in the 

premises, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion to Approve Mortgage Modification Agreement between the 

Debtor and PHH Mortgage (“Lender”) regarding real property located at 

6207 NW 66th Way, Parkland, FL 33067 is granted. 

2. The parties are authorized to take any and all necessary actions to 

effectuate the terms of the Agreement.

3. [For chapter 13 cases] The Debtor shall amend/modify the last filed 

chapter 13 plan on or before October 1, 2022 to provide for the payment.

4. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement and 

this Order.

###

Chad T Van Horn, Esq. shall serve a conformed copy of this Order upon all parties of 

interest and shall file a Certificate of Service in accordance with Local Rule 2002-1(F).

Case 22-10014-SMG Doc 80 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 2
J.W., Father of A.T., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT 1934,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Arthur
Johnson, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Odyssey Oil & Energy,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:




a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and




c.
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):




a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.




Dated: April
      14, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Arthur JohnsonArthur
      JohnsonPrincipal
      Executive Officer,President,Chief
      Financial Officer
                And Principal Accounting Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  science 

#           Laboratories      

-  Science 
-  Science Explorer 
-  Mission Areas 
-  Programs 
-  Regions 
-  Science Centers 
-  Observatories 
-  Laboratories 
-  Frequently Asked Questions 
-  Educational Resources 
-  Special Topics 

The USGS has over 500 laboratories nationwide. Those with active sites are listed here, with many more coming online over the coming year.

Locations Map
Tenita MORRIS, Appellant, v. James ORR, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.