alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Localization and physical properties experiments conducted by Spirit at Gusev crater      

      January 1, 2004    

The precise location and relative elevation of Spirit during its traverses from the Columbia Memorial station to Bonneville crater were determined with bundle-adjusted retrievals from rover wheel turns, suspension and tilt angles, and overlapping images. Physical properties experiments show a decrease of 0.2% per Mars solar day in solar cell output resulting from deposition of airborne dust, cohesive soil-like deposits in plains and hollows, bright and dark rock coatings, and relatively weak volcanic rocks of basaltic composition. Volcanic, impact, aeolian, and water-related processes produced the encountered landforms and materials.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Gusev Crater; Mars
                  - Gusev Crater
                  -  Mars

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9880]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-038)]


National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) 
Advisory Board; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the National Space-Based 
Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Advisory Board. The agenda for 
the meeting includes updates from each of the three PNT Panels 
(Leadership, Strategic Engagement and Communication, Future 
Challenges), including discussion and deliberation of potential 
recommendations. The PNT Advisory Board will address U.S. Government 
interests in the following areas:
    <bullet> Implementation of the President's 2004 U.S. Space-Based 
Positioning, Navigation and Timing Policy.
    <bullet> National Space-Based PNT Executive Committee, and National 
Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
    <bullet> Global Positioning System (GPS) Constellation and 
Modernization Plans.
    <bullet> U.S. GPS Technological Leadership and Competitiveness.
    <bullet> Promoting and Branding Current and Future PNT Capabilities 
to the U.S. and International Communities.
    <bullet> Global Technical and Market Trends for PNT Services.
    <bullet> Future Areas of Study.

DATES: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.; Friday, May 15, 2009, 9 
a.m.- 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Embassy Suites Hotel at Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015-2020, phone: 202-362-9300.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James J. Miller, Space Operations 
Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Washington, DC, 20546. Phone 202-358-4417.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be 
held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key 
participants.

    Dated: April 24, 2009.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9880 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 4 (Monday, January 8, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-21380]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 4 / Monday, January 8, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 849]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminstration

49 CFR Part 390

[Docket No. FMCSA-2005-23315]
RIN 2126-AA86


Requirements for Intermodal Equipment Providers and Motor 
Carriers and Drivers Operating Intermodal Equipment

Correction

    In proposed rule document E6-21380 beginning on page 76796 in the 
issue of Thursday, December 21, 2006 make the following corrections:


Sec.  390.46  [Corrected]

    1. On page 76829, in Sec.  390.46, in the first column, in the 
second full paragraph, in the first line, ``(i) Nonpreemption 
determinations'' should read ``(2) Nonpreemption determinations''.
    2. On the same page, in the same section, in the same paragraph, in 
the second line, ``(A) In general'' should read ``(i) In general''.

[FR Doc. Z6-21380 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Volcanologic investigations in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, September-October 1990      

      January 1, 1991    

View Document

U.S. Geological Survey volcanologists examined the ten volcanoes in the active Mariana Arc north of Saipan in May 1992, at the request of the Governor and the Disaster Control Office of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). A shallow earthquake swarm on Anatahan in March-April 1990 and reports of possible new fuming on Agrigan in August 1990 had prompted the evacuation of all CNMI islands north of Saipan. None of the volcanoes in the chain erupted during our visit. Five uninhabited islands (Farallon de Pajaros, Maug, Asuncion, Guguan, and Sarigan) were inspected only from the air, while the other four were studied in more detail. The previously installed seismic stations on Anatahan, Alamagan, and South Pagan were upgraded. A new station was established at the southwestern base of the intermittently active Mount Pagan, on the northern end of Pagan Island. Portable seismometers were operated on Anatahan, Alamagan, Pagan, and Agrigan. The seismometers on Anatahan, Alamagan, and Agrigan recorded no local shallow earthquake swarms nor volcanic tremor indicative of shallow magmatic movement. On Mount Pagan, intermittent low-amplitude tremor indicated the continuing possibility of occasional small ash eruptions, which prior to our visit had been witnessed in April 1992. Ash eruptions resumed in February 1993. Electronic distance measurement (EDM) lines were remeasured on Agrigan, Mount Pagan, and Anatahan. Line length changes were generally insignificant, in accord with the absence of significant shallow seismicity. Hot spring waters were collected on Agrigan, Pagan, and Anatahan, and fumarole temperatures were measured on Agrigan, Pagan, Alamagan, and Anatahan. The temperature data showed no indication of an impending significant change in the state of these volcanoes. We mapped the geology of Alamagan, collected charcoal to date eruptions of Alamagan and Mount Pagan, and collected rocks on Agrigan, Pagan, Alamagan, and Anatahan for petrographic and chemical studies. We conclude that the low shallow seismicity, lack of significant deformation, and low fumarole temperatures suggest that no eruption is likely soon on Agrigan, Alamagan, or Anatahan. The persistent low-level volcanic tremor on Mount Pagan suggests that intermittent small explosive eruptions may continue to occur.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         101,510
<SECURITIES>                                    14,306
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       678
<INVENTORY>                                      1,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,830
<PP&E>                                           9,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,199
<SALES>                                         56,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,409
<CGS>                                           11,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,192
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
Larry John EARGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Banco de Chile (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 25, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ Arturo Tagle Q.
|                      |  |  |  | Name:               |  | Arturo Tagle Q.        
|                      |  |  |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 25, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ Pedro Samhan E.
|                      |  |  |  | Name:               |  | Pedro Samhan E.        
|                      |  |  |  | Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Banco de
Chile and will be retained by Banco de Chile and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Morteza Ejabat, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zhone Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

November 12, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6771

JOSEPH MICHAEL GRATE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00020-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Michael Grate, Appellant Pro Se. James Robert Bryden, II,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

 2 

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Grate seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal

was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

October 18, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on April 17,

2008.* Because Grate failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
 3 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 31266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10608]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 31266]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 268

[EPA-F-98-2P4F-FFFFF; FRL-6010-5]
RIN 2050 AE05


Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV: Final Rule Promulgating 
Treatment Standards for Metal Wastes and Mineral Processing Wastes; 
Mineral Processing Secondary Materials and Bevill Exclusion Issues; 
Treatment Standards for Hazardous Soils, and Exclusion of Recycled Wood 
Preserving Wastewaters

Correction

    In rule document 98-12575 beginning on page 28556 in the issue of 
Tuesday, May 26, 1998, make the following correction:


Table 1 to Appendix VII  [Corrected]

    On page 28751, in the third column, in amendatory instruction 19., 
in the fourth line from the bottom, after ``and'' insert ``adding''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 57 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-35784) and Amendment No. 467 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 7, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 4, 2017
The SANTA BARBARA SMOKEHOUSE, INC., etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The MACKNIGHT FOOD GROUP, INC., etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0731

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Edward WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Joseph AUSTIN v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1099

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

*266Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Spatially consistent high-resolution land surface temperature mosaics for thermophysical mapping of the Mojave Desert      

      June 13, 2019    

Daytime and nighttime thermal infrared observations acquired by the ASTER and MODIS instruments onboard the NASA Terra spacecraft have produced a dataset that can be used to map thermophysical properties across large regions, which have implications on surface processes, thermal environments and habitat suitability for desert species. ASTER scenes acquired between 2004 and 2012 are combined using new mosaicking and data-fusion techniques to produce a map of daytime and nighttime land surface temperature with coverage exclusive of the effects of clouds and weather. These data are combined with Landsat 7 visible imagery to generate a consistent map of apparent thermal inertia (ATI), which is related to the presence of exposed bedrock, rocks, fine-grained sediments and water on the surface. The resulting datasets are compared to known geomorphic units and surface types to generate an interpreted mechanical composition map of the entire Mojave Desert at 100 m per pixel that is most sensitive to large clast size distinctions in grain size distribution.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Richard  Inman, PhD

##### Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

rdinman@usgs.gov

970-226-9309

#### Todd Esque

##### Research Ecologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

tesque@usgs.gov

702-564-4506

## Related Content

#### Richard  Inman, PhD

##### Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

rdinman@usgs.gov

970-226-9309

#### Todd Esque

##### Research Ecologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

tesque@usgs.gov

702-564-4506

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Mojave Desert
                  - ARizone
                  -  California
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Utah

View All **
EXHIBIT 13.1



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Veolia Environnement, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
  April 19, 2010



|By:    | /s/ Antoine Frérot     
|------ | -----------------------
|Name:  | Antoine Frérot         
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veolia Environnement and will be retained by Veolia Environnement and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

EXHIBIT 13.1



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Veolia Environnement, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
  April 19, 2010

|By:    | /s/ Pierre-François Riolacci
|------ | ----------------------------
|Name:  | Pierre-François Riolacci    
|Title: | Chief Finance Officer       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veolia Environnement and will be retained by Veolia Environnement and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileKaj Williams, Ph.D.