alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned Deborah M. Fretz, being, respectively, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Neal E. Murphy, being respectively, the Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, of Sunoco Partners LLC, the general partner of the registrant Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., do each certify that the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco
Logistics Partners L.P.

Date: February 24, 2009



/s/ DEBORAH M. FRETZName: Deborah M. FretzTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 24, 2009/s/ NEAL E. MURPHYName: Neal E. MurphyTitle: Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: February 24, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1980        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

Human Capital        September 19, 2018        Dave Roddy
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_publications(6)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - (-)maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2001        Size and mass of grit in gizzards of sandhill cranes, tundra swans, and mute swans

publication        March 27, 2017        Occurrence, temporal variation, and estrogenic burden of five parabens in sewage sludge collected across the United States

publication        May 5, 2016        Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture

publication        January 1, 2003        Motorized migrations: The future or mere fantasy?

publication        January 1, 2013        USGS National Wildlife Health Center quarterly mortality report – July 2012 to September 2012

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Dyas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2005                 By: /s/ James Dyas
                                          James Dyas
                                          Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-40549 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HERBERT EDWARD JAMES, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:92-CR-163-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Herbert Edward James, federal pris o n e r # 04134-078, was convicted in 1993 of various offenses involving cocaine base as well as of possession of a firearm by a felon. He received concurrent terms of life and 40 years in prison, within the guidelines range of life as cal c u l a t e d b y the probation officer. Following 20 0 7 amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, the district court reduced James’s sentence to concurrent terms of 360 months on all counts, at the bottom of the amended range of 360 months to life. James filed a timely notice U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 18, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40549 Document: 00511576118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2011No. 10-40549

of appeal. The district court denied James leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal on the basis th a t J a m e s did not meet the financial eligibility requirements. James now seeks leave from this court to proceed IFP. A movant seeking IFP status must demonstrate both that he is financially eligible and that his appeal is taken i n good faith, i.e., that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue. Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 568, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). We need not reach whether James can show financial eligibility, because he has failed to demonstrate that his appeal will raise a nonfrivolous issue. James argues that the district court should have considered his postsentencing r e h abilitation and departed from the guidelines range on that basis, citing the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Pepper v. United States , 131 S. Ct. 1229 (2011), in which the Cou rt h e ld that on resentencing following remand, a district court had discretion to consider postsentencing rehabilitative conduct. This argument is without merit. A § 3582(c)(2) pr o c e e di n g is not a resentencing. Dillon v. United States , 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2 6 9 1-92 (2010). Sentencing courts h av e no authority under § 3582(c)(2) to reduce a sentence below the amended gui delines range, unless the district court originally imposed

a sentence below the guidelines range, which is not the case here. See id. Thus, the district court could not have reduced James’s sentence below the amended minimum of 360 months. See United States v. Doublin , 572 F.3d 235, 238 (5th Cir. 2009). Because the appeal lacks any arguable legal merit, James’s IFP motion is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-40549 Document: 00511576118 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

70452 

Vol. 71, No. 232 

Monday, December 4, 2006 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Health Resources and Services 

Administration 

Statement of Organization, Functions 

and Delegations of Authority 

Correction 

In notice document E6–20171 

beginning on page 69135 in the issue of 

Wednesday, November 29, 2006, make 

the following correction: 

On page 69137, in the second column, 

in the fifth line from the end of the 

document, ‘‘November 7, 2006’’ should 

read ‘‘Dated: November 17, 2006’’. 

[FR Doc. Z6–20171 Filed 12–1–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES5
Roger L. LOWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-521 5D17-3927

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Memorandum

January 13, 2016

To: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0204

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region 9, Air Planning Office

Subject: Conference Call with Ports of Los Angeles on EPA’s Proposed Approval of 

South Coast 2006 PM2.5 Moderate Area Attainment Plan and Reclassification 

(80 FR 63640, October 20, 2015)

Attendees:

EPA, OAR: Deborah Jordan, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the Acting Assistant 

Administrator

EPA Region 9: Elizabeth Adams, Acting Director, Air Division

Wienke Tax, Planner, Air Planning Office

Port of Los Angeles: Rich Gold

EPA held a conference call on January 4, 2016 with Rich Gold, at his request, to discuss his

questions concerning the process and timing of EPA’s final action on the South Coast Air 

Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) moderate area attainment plan for the 2006 PM2.5 

NAAQS. Mr. Gold asked EPA to explain the process and timing for EPA’s final action on the 

SCAQMD’s commitment concerning the backstop measure for ports and port-related 

facilities. 

EPA responded that we would take final action on the 2006 PM2.5 Plan by mid-March 2016. 

Mr. Gold inquired about the effective date of the final rule. We explained that it generally 

takes a few weeks to publish a rule and that we typically use a 30-day effective date. Mr. 

Gold thanked us for the meeting in November and indicated that the Ports have been 

meeting with the State and the District about this measure.
Official Form 204 Chapter 11 or Chapter 9 Cases: List of Creditors Who Have the 20 Largest Unsecured Claims page 1 

Official Form 204 

Chapter 11 or Chapter 9 Cases: List of Creditors Who Have the 20 Largest 

Unsecured Claims and Are Not Insiders 12/15

A list of creditors holding the 20 largest unsecured claims must be filed in a Chapter 11 or Chapter 9 case. Include claims which the debtor 

disputes. Do not include claims by any person or entity who is an insider, as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(31). Also, do not include claims by 

secured creditors, unless the unsecured claim resulting from inadequate collateral value places the creditor among the holders of the 20 

largest unsecured claims. 

Name of creditor and complete 

mailing address, including zip code

Name, telephone number, 

and email address of 

creditor contact 

Nature of the claim 

(for example, trade

debts, bank loans, 

professional 

services, and 

government 

contracts)

Indicate if 

claim is 

contingent, 

unliquidated, 

or disputed 

Amount of unsecured claim

If the claim is fully unsecured, fill in only unsecured 

claim amount. If claim is partially secured, fill in 

total claim amount and deduction for value of 

collateral or setoff to calculate unsecured claim. 

Total claim, if 

partially 

secured

Deduction for 

value of 

collateral or 

setoff

Unsecured 

claim

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

 Check if this is an

amended filing

Debtor name __________________________________________________________________ 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the:_______________________________ 

Case number (If known): _________________________ 

 Fill in this information to identify the case:

Edgewater Holdings Miami, LLC

Monies Loaned /

Advanced

Monies Loaned /

Advanced

Monies Loaned /

Advanced

Suppliers or Vendors

270,000.00

62,700.00

54,000.00

8,500.00

Southern District of Florida

The Turn2 Group LLC

1825 Ponce de Leon Blvd

# 95

Miami, FL, 33134

US Small Business Administration -

Disaster Loan Service Center

2 N. 20th St.

Suite 320

Birmingham, AL, 35203

US Small Business Administration -

Disaster Loan Service Center

2 N. 20th St.

Suite 320

Birmingham, AL, 35203

Michael Cosculluela & Daniel Marzano

14261 Commerce Lane

Miami Lakes, FL, 33016

Michael Cosculluela

305-828-1909

mcoscullela@cmpalaw.com

800-736-6048

800-736-4048

Alain Rodriguez

305-525-5721

arod@turn2group.com

Case 22-10882-LMI Doc 1 Filed 02/02/22 Page 6 of 44 Case 22-10882-LMI Doc 5 Filed 02/02/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 6286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 98-2406 appearing on page 5411, in the issue of 
Monday, February 2, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 5411, in the first column, the DATES section should read:
DATES: The meeting will be held on February 18, 1998, 9:00 a.m. PST.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHANGJUN WANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72451

Agency No. A088-271-050

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2014** 

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Changjun Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal of the

immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reconsider the denial of his application

for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

FILED

MAR 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311

F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and review for substantial evidence factual findings,

Jiang v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1086, 1091 (9th Cir. 2010). We grant in part and deny

in part the petition for review, and we remand.

Wang’s wife was subjected to two forced abortions, in 1988 and 1991. After

Wang protested the second abortion, he was arrested, detained, and kept in a stress

position for 24 hours without food or water. Beyond the fact that the BIA does not

appear to have considered the first abortion in evaluating past persecution,

substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that the second abortion

and the mistreatment Wang personally experienced did not rise to the level of past

persecution. See Jiang, 611 F.3d at 1095-96 (mistreatment including petitioner’s

detention and girlfriend’s forced abortion). Thus, the BIA abused its discretion in

dismissing his appeal of the IJ’s denial of his motion to reconsider. See CanoMerida, 311 F.3d at 964 (stating the standard for abuse of discretion). In light of

this conclusion and the possibility of a presumption of future fear, we do not

address the BIA’s finding that Wang failed to establish an independent claim of

future persecution.

2 11-72451
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appeal with respect to

Wang’s CAT claim as Wang failed to establish it is more likely than not he would

be tortured at the instigation of or with the acquiescence of the government if

returned to China. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).

Thus, we remand Wang’s claims for asylum and withholding of removal to

the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v.

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED in part; DENIED in part;

REMANDED.

3 11-72451
Laura DUNHAM, Appellant, v. CITRUS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 111 (Monday, June 9, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 32629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-10742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[FWS-R2[dash]ES[dash]2008[dash]0055; 
92210[dash]1117[dash]0000[dash]FY08[dash]B4]
RIN 1018[dash]AV46


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised 
Designation of Critical Habitat for the Wintering Population of the 
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) in Texas

Correction

    In proposed rule document E8-10742 beginning on page 29294, in the 
issue of Tuesday, May 20, 2008, make the following corrections:
    (1) On page 29300, in the second column, in paragraph (3) in the 
first line ``TX 0910'' should read ``TX-10''.
    (2) On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in 
lines 6, 9, and 18 ``TX 0910C and TX 0910 C'' are corrected to read 
``TX-10C''.
    (3) On the same page, in the third column, in paragraph (4) in the 
first line, ``TX 0914'' should read ``TX-14''.

    (4) On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph (5) ``TX 
0917'' should read ``TX-17''.
    (5) On the same page, in the same column, in the last paragraph, 
lines 13 and 14 should read ``vacated until TX-17 is not described 
because we are not proposing that it be''.
[FR Doc. Z8-10742 Filed 6-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Mario RIOS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1799

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

41208

Vol. 61, No. 153

Wednesday, August 7, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 56-96]

Foreign-Trade Zone 181—AkronCanton, Ohio Area; Applications for

Expansion

Correction

In the correction to notice document

96–18257, appearing on page 39695, in

the issue of Tuesday, July 30, 1996, the

entry should read as set forth below:

On page 37443, in the first column, in

the fourth full paragraph, in the seventh

line, ‘‘[60 days from publication]’’

should read ‘‘September 16, 1996’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 32 and 64

[CC Docket No. 96–150, FCC 96–309]

Implementation of the

Telecommunications Act of 1996:

Accounting Safeguards Under the

Telecommunications Act of 1996

Correction

In proposed rule document 96–19563

beginning on page 40161 in the issue of

Thursday, August 1, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 40180, in the 2d column, in

the 1st paragraph, in the 10th and 11th

lines, ‘‘[insert date 60 days after

publication in the Federal Register.]’’

should read ‘‘September 30, 1996’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 10 and 15

2115-AF23

Licensing and Manning for Officers of

Towing Vessels

Correction

In the correction to proposed rule

document 96–15346 appearing on page

36608 in the issue of Thursday, July 11,

1996 the following entry should read as

set forth below:

§ 10.463 [Corrected]

On page 31345, in the second column,

in § 10.463(b), in the seventh line

‘‘10.414’’ should read ‘‘10.424’’; and in

the eighth line ‘‘10,418’’ should read

‘‘10.418’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per

Diem Rates

Correction

In notice document 96–16213

beginning on page 33097 in the issue of

Wednesday, June 26, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 33099, the table is replaced

with the following:

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 7, 1996 / Corrections 41209

BILLING CODE 1505–01–C