alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-11098-MAM

CHAPTER 7

ROBERT W. SZOSTAK

Debtor.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCKET ENTRY 87

Debtor, Robert W. Szostak, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby notifies the 

Court of this Notice of Withdrawal of Docket Entry 87 (ECF 87), filed on March 20, 2023.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was furnished electronically where 

available or by regular mail to all parties listed on the attached list , this 21st day of 

March , 2023.

I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I 

am in compliance with the additional qualification to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

RAPPAPORT OSBORNE & RAPPAPORT, PLLC

Attorneys for Debtor

Suite 203, Squires Building

1300 North Federal Highway

Boca Raton, Florida 33432

Telephone: (561) 368-2200

BY: /s/ Steven N. Newburgh 

 STEVEN N. NEWBURGH, ESQ.

 FL Bar No. 348619

SERVICE LIST:

To All Parties on the attached matrix

Case 22-11098-MAM Doc 88 Filed 03/21/23 Page 1 of 3
	

	




	


	
	

	





 !"##
$

%%&'%%()
*%"
+&%

*
,	-
	

)
	
."
,	"(%%%%/%+0
	
12%(+&%

3"$

4,	%5%/5(6 -4%&%

"	

	
),.
$	
 	1
$	




 !"
%/'/"
'%%'

%%()
*%),.	.)%/'/ "
47/'%%'

"
,	"(%%%%/%+





	891
1	

"
''&"
%*
,-

:
;8

3
$

- '''&*1
8<4'+&%3"$)+&((









	.
$
8	.
1

"
6%+"
'%/'"
&/(

*

,)*-(//6%+
,$,:+%'%/'202'







:*1=	.-	$

8
3"$
	


	

(3

*+/&& *,
&
"

,	

,
0>+%&&&6
#
)+++(&&&"

.*,
%&'

"	

0?&'(+&/6







<*4	,@A"00B# 4=0-=0C"	

	
),.


(*3"7+'%&&"

.*,
%&'

*,
%&+2 0-:++&+'%"	

0?&'(+&/6


$
)&6+





4
8


		.
-	1?1	#
	),		

"7/'6
#.*$
";;;,			,
$

.	#
.=(%+&&&&+//	*D&&%%((C.#
.*+

"
.
"&%/6%
#
)+//





#
	3*E
1**0;,	

*-

:;8&&0).	:;8*,
%&

((
#
)+%%'+'

3"$)+&((6









4			.$

..	@A
,
,.
	

;

8




.

8
.
8


0


..	
.,	,
<*+%@A.).#1"%&&%@A@+A





"01

)

"1;8

B$E

=+&&







Case 22-11098-MAM Doc 88 Filed 03/21/23 Page 2 of 3
	

		


	


		








 !	"

!	
		
##


		
$

#%





Case 22-11098-MAM Doc 88 Filed 03/21/23 Page 3 of 3
Yessenia SOFFIN and William Jordan Soffin, Appellants, v. CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Douglas Hague, and David Douglas, as Independent Executor of the Estate of C.J. Douglas, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2751

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 4, 2021.

Case 21-14282-SMG Doc 57 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-14282-SMG Doc 57 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 2
# The Attorney General of Texas August 5, 1980
MARK WHITE Attorney General Honorable George N.Rodriguei BlPasoCounty Attorney Courthouse ElPaso, Texas Opinion No. MW-218 Re: Responsibility for transportation of prisoners to the Texas Department of Corrections Dear Mr.Rodriguez: You have requested our opinion regard@ responsibility for the cost of transporting prisoners to the Texas Department of Corrections. Article 6166r,V.T.C.S., provides:

The manager [nowtheDirector of the Department of Correctionslshall make suitable provision and regulations for the safe and speedy transportation of prisoners from counties where sentenced to the State penitentiary by the sheriffs of such respective counties if such sheriffs are willing to perform such services as cheaolv as said commission can have it done otherwise. bhd transportation shaBbe onState account and. in no instance shall the prisoners be carried direct ftom the county jails to the State farm, but shall first be carried- to the receivitlg station as designated by the Prison Board [now Board of Corrections] where the character of labor which each prisoner mayreasonably perform shall be determined. Upon the arrival of each prisoner at such receivin8 station, the manager shall cause a statement to be made by the prisoner, givim~ a brief history of his life, andshowing where he hasresided, the names andpost-office addresses of hisimmediate relatives, and such other facts as will tend to show his past habits and character; and the manager shall, by correspondence, or otherwise verify or disprove such statements, if practicable, Andy shall preserve the record and information SDobtained for future reference. (Emphasisadded).

P. 696,

Honorable George N. Rodriguez - PageTWO (NW-218)

InAttorney General Opinion WW-651(1959),thisoffice said that article 6166r: places the primary dutyoftransporting State prisoners from the various counties where held to the State Penitentiary upon the Texas Department of Corrections. The statute permits the director of the Department of Corrections to contract with the sheriff for the purpose of transporting its prisoners, but, whensuch anagreement isineffect, it is up to the Prison System to pay himsuch compensation as

was agreed uponbetween theparties. Attorney General Opinion O-1808 (1940). See also, Attorney General Opinion O-724 (1939). Weconclude therefore that theTexas Department of Corrections isresponsible for the agreed cost of transporting prisoners from a county to a facility of the Department. SUMMARY

The Texas Department of Corrections is responsible for the agreed cost of transporting prisoners from acounty to a facility of the Department. velYtr~.s

MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHNW.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General Prepared byRick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMlTTEE C. Robert Heath, Chairman JimAllison Jon Bible Gerald Carruth Walter Davis SusanGarrison Rick Gilpin Bruce Youngblood

p. 697
Regis SANSON and Michelle Sanson, Appellants, v. REFLECTION KEY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and Jill L. Trentz, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO


PROMISSORY NOTE AND BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT


 


	 	 	 	 
	BORROWER:	
        CarePayment Technologies, Inc.

        5300 Meadows Road, Suite 400

        Lake Oswego, OR 97035

        Telephone: (503) 419-3530
	LENDER:	
        Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC 5300 Meadows
        Road, Suite 400

        Lake Oswego, OR 97035

        Telephone: (503) 419-3500

	 	 	 	 


 


Principal Amount (As Amended): $8,000,000


 


Date of Note and
Loan Agreement: September 29, 2011 Date of Amendment: March 5, 2012


 


CarePayment Technologies, Inc. (“Borrower”)
and Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC (“Lender”) hereby agree to execute this Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment")
dated effective March 5, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) to that certain Promissory Note dated September 29, 2011
(the "Note") and that certain Business Loan Agreement dated September 29, 2011 (the “Loan Agreement”)
(collectively, the “Loan”). As of the Effective Date, the maximum principal balance of the Loan was $4,500,000
and the current balance as drawn was $4,131,000.


 


1.DEFINITIONS.
All capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.


 


2.PRINCIPAL AMOUNT.
Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


"PROMISE
TO PAY. CarePayment Technologies, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order
of Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company (“Lender”), in lawful money of the
United States of America, the principal amount of up to Eight Million and 00/100 Dollars ($8,000,000.00), or so much thereof as
has been borrowed and is outstanding, together with interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of disbursement until
paid in full. Borrower will pay Lender at Lender’s address shown above or at such other place as Lender may designate in
writing."


 


3.LOAN AGREEMENT.
All references in the Loan Agreement to the maximum principal balance of $4,500,000 are hereby changed to read as the maximum principal
balance of $8,000,000.


 


4.INTEREST RATE
MODIFIED. Section 2(a) of the Loan Agreement and Section 4 of the Note are hereby modified to reflect an interest rate of 12.5%
per annum on the unpaid principal balance beginning with the effective date of this Amendment.


 


5.NO OTHER CHANGES.
All other terms and conditions of the Loan not specifically amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged and full force
and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 








	BORROWER:	LENDER:
	 	 
	CAREPAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	AEQUITAS COMMERCIAL FINANCE, LLC
	 	 	By: Aequitas Capital Management, Inc., its Manager
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Patricia J. Brown	By: 	/s/ Robert J. Jesenik
	Name:	Patricia J. Brown	Name: 	Robert J. Jesenik
	Title:	CFO	Title: 	President and CEO
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND HUME, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of 

Social Security, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-35912 

D.C. No. 3:16-cv-01766-SB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 26, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Hume appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner 

of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and 

supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 28 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-35912 

(Act). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We 

review de novo, Attmore v. Colvin, 827 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2016), and we 

reverse and remand for further proceedings. 

The ALJ provided a specific and legitimate reason for assigning little weight 

to treating psychologist Dr. Born’s opinion as to the degree of limitation caused by 

Hume’s mental health impairments. See Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 

1041 (9th Cir. 2008) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Substantial 

evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Dr. Born’s opinion was inconsistent with 

the normal mental status findings reported by other doctors. Because the ALJ 

provided a specific and legitimate reason for assigning little weight to Dr. Born’s 

opinion, any error in the ALJ’s additional reasoning was harmless. See Molina v. 

Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1115 (9th Cir. 2012). 

Substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s step-four finding that Hume 

is capable of performing his past work as a surveillance system monitor as actually 

performed. See Pinto v. Massanari, 249 F.3d 840, 844 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Although 

the burden of proof lies with the claimant at step four, the ALJ still has a duty to 

make the requisite factual findings to support his conclusion.”). Hume’s testimony 

indicates that his past work as actually performed includes functional demands that 

exceed the limitations in his RFC to “simple tasks, routine and repetitive tasks” 

and “only occasional interaction with coworkers and the public.” Because the ALJ 
3 17-35912 

did not discount this testimony or make any findings as to how Hume’s past work 

was actually performed, substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s step-four 

finding. See id. at 847 (by failing to make specific findings as to the actual 

demands of past work, the ALJ provided no basis on which to review the agency 

decision). We remand for the ALJ to reconsider the step-four conclusion and, if 

necessary, proceed to step five. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(5)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - (-)tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 173

[Docket No. 96F-0184]


Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human 
Consumption; Sulphopropyl Cellulose

Correction

    In rule document 97-4082 beginning on page 7678 in the issue of 
Thursday, February 20, 1997, make the following corrections:
    On page 7678, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
first line ``February 19, 1997'' should read ``February 20, 1997'' and 
in the third line ``March 21, 1997'' should read ``March 24, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
John Henry BUFFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(14)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - (-)montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Project        November 5, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Monitoring Study

Research        April 12, 2016        Greg Pederson's Past Projects
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2001-B
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2001-B and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of November
1, 2001 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture .

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and convenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2002.

                             CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2001-B
                             BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                             capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                             /s/ Denise Geran
                             ------------------------------------
                             Name: Denise Geran
                             Title: Senior Financial Services Officer

         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                             CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                             NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                             /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                             -----------------------------------
                             Richard J. Naeder
                             Authorized Signatory
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Why the 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake matters 50 years later      

      April 1, 2014    

Spring was returning to Alaska on Friday 27 March 1964. A two‐week cold snap had just ended, and people were getting ready for the Easter weekend. At 5:36 p.m., an earthquake initiated 12 km beneath Prince William Sound, near the eastern end of what is now recognized as the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone. No one was expecting this earthquake that would radically alter the coastal landscape, influence the direction of science, and indelibly mark the growth of a burgeoning state.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

## Related Content

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
Maria RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. SWISSPORT and Gallagher Basset, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0265

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(16)
              - california(3)
              - (-)district of columbia(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!
<PAGE>   1



         EXHIBIT 11.1 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
               (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            THREE MONTHS
                                                                                   ENDED
                                                                          MARCH 31, 2000
                                                                          --------------
<S>                                                                        <C>
COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Weighted average shares outstanding...................................         5,925,000
Weighted average shares and common stock equivalents..................         5,925,000
                                                                              ==========
Net income ...........................................................        $      218
                                                                              ==========
VBasic earnings per share..............................................       $     0.04
                                                                              ==========
COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Weighted average shares outstanding ..................................         5,925,000
Dilutive impact of stock options, as determined by the
  application of the treasury stock method ...........................           306,346
                                                                              ----------
Weighted average shares and common stock equivalents..................         6,231,346
                                                                              ==========
Net income............................................................        $      218
                                                                              ==========
Diluted earnings per share ...........................................        $     0.03
                                                                              ==========
</TABLE>