alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - (-)alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Research        March 7, 2024        ASC Water Data Releases
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     We hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annualperiod ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, to the best of my knowledge, fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CompassMinerals Group, Inc.    COMPASS MINERALS GROUP, INC.   Date: March 15, 2005      /s/ Michael E. Ducey   Michael E. DuceyPresident and Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Rodney Underdown   Rodney UnderdownChief Financial Officer and Vice President
Case 20-22586-PDR Doc 12 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-22586-PDR Doc 12 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-22586-PDR Doc 12 Filed 12/14/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VMH VideoMovieHouse.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Steven Gaspar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of October, 2005.



| | /s/ Steven Gaspar                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Steven Gaspar                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
<PAGE>


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'


The Board of Directors
Mobile PET Systems, Inc.
2150 West Washington Street, Suite 110
San Diego, California 92110


As the independent public accountants' for Mobile PET Systems, Inc. we hereby
consent to the incorporation in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Mobile
PET Systems, Inc., the December 31, 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial
statements. We also consent to all other references to our company included in
this Quarterly Report.


                                         PETERSON & CO.


February 14, 2001

Peterson & Co.
3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 500
San Diego, California 92122-1089
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 55 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 55 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 55 Filed 03/21/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 55 Filed 03/21/22 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 165 (Friday, August 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-37476; File No. SR-NYSE-95-43]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments 
to Exchange Rules 27, 476(a)(11), and 477

Correction

    In notice document 96-19466 beginning on page 40056 in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 31, 1996 make the following correction:
    On page 40058, in the first column, after the second full paragraph 
insert the following:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Ivan DALA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Mike SCOTT, Lee County Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4432

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
San Pedro Nunez MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.46

 

OPTION TO AMEND SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

 

THIS OPTION TO AMEND SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated January 9, 2012, (this “Option to Amend”), is between General Moly, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”), and Hanlong (USA) Mining Investment, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Purchaser”). Capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement, as defined below.

 

RECITALS

 

A.            The Company and Purchaser are parties to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 4, 2010 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, Amendment No. 2 and Waiver to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated October 26, 2010, Amendment No. 3 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 20, 2010, Amendment No. 4 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 7 ,2011, and as further amended, restated or replaced, the “Agreement”); and

 

B.            The parties desire to provide the Company with the option to amend the Agreement to modify dates for specified payments provided in the Agreement.

 

Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, the parties intending to be legally bound agree as follows.

 

AGREEMENT

 

The Company may, at is option amend the Agreement by written notice to Purchaser delivered (in the manner specified in the Agreement) on or before December 31, 2012, to provide that the payments specified in the last sentence of Section 7.2(e) shall be payable on April 30, 2013 (or credited against the Arrangement Fee), instead of as provided in Section 7.2(e).

 

Except as may be amended by the Company upon exercise of this Option, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Signature page follows]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
GENERAL   MOLY, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Bruce D. Hansen
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Bruce   D. Hansen
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
HANLONG (USA) MINING INVESTMENT,   INC.
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Nelson Feng Chen
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Nelson   Feng Chen
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Director
Josh NEWMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1075

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's First Quarter ended March 31, 2000 Unaudited Financial Statements and
is qualifies in its entirety by reference to such financial statements and to
its Audited Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          1000                    1000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1000)                  (1000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Walters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Stephen Walters Stephen Walters Chief Executive Officer November 22, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Glenn Barrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



|                  |  |    
|----------------- |  | ---
|Date: May 5, 2004 |  |    
|                  |  | By:

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Banco de Chile (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 24, 2005



/s/ Pablo GranifoName:

Pablo GranifoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




Date: June 24, 2005



/s/ Arturo TagleName:

Arturo TagleTitle:

Manager  Planning and Research Division Chief Financial Officer
Theodore MATTEWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1381

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Robert W. ROSS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY and Gallagher Bassett Services, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CGFD28 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on July 7, 2023

Robert A Mark

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−19854−RAM

Chapter: 7

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

AGM Home Store, LLC

1770 NW 106th Avenue

Pembroke Pines, FL 33026

EIN: 47−5263301

FINAL DECREE

The trustee, Barry E Mukamal, having filed a final report that the estate has been fully administered, is

discharged and the case is closed.

Case 21-19854-RAM Doc 40 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 1
Case 21-12256-AJC Doc 2 Filed 03/09/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-12256-AJC Doc 2 Filed 03/09/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF 

## NOV - 4 2011 AIR AND RADIATION

The Honorable John Hoeven United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear SenatorHoeven: Thank you for your letter ofOctober 6, 2011, co-signed by two ofyour colleagues, addressed to Administrator LisaJackson in which you request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency respect the technicaljudgment ofNorth Dakota as the state permitting authority and accept the state's State Implementation Plan (SIP) for regional haze.
We acknowledge the importance ofthe issues related to several coal-fired powerplants in NorthDakota and agree that states have primary responsibility to develop regional haze SIPs. However, the CleanAir Act (CAA) clearly requires the EPAto review the adequacy ofthe regional haze SIPs and requires the EPA to take action to correct any deficiencies in the SIP where the EPAhas disapproved all or part ofa SIP. See CAA sections llO(k) and (c).
In our September21,2011 proposal, we agreed with many ofNorth Dakota's decisions regarding CAArequired Best Available RetrofitTechnology (BART)

- emissioncontrols for certaintypes ofolder industrial facilities emitting air pollutants that reduce visibility. However, because North Dakota's analyses ofcontrols for some ofthe sources subject to BART, and ofcontrols on other sources that could help provide reasonable progress towards visibility goals, are not merely different from our own, but appearto be significantly flawed, we proposed disapproval ofthose parts ofthe SIP and proposed a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to ensure that air pollution improvements continue. Specifically, we disagree with North Dakota's conclusions that selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from facilities in North Dakotais technically infeasible. We also found that North Dakota has substantially over-estimated costs and based some control level conclusions on modeling techniques which substantially understate visibility improvements. Nonetheless, ourproposal notes that should we finalize our FIP as proposed, the affected facilities and/or the state may request reconsideration ofour final action based onthe potential outcomes ofany field testing ofSCR feasibility they may choose to undertake priorto the datc the cmission limits in ourFIP become effective.
Wethank you for testifying at the public hearing held on October 14, 2011. We welcome public comments on ourproposaL until November21, 2011. We intend to carefully consider these comments as we make a final decision. Our current schedule, which is court-ordered, requires us to make a final decision onourproposal no later than February 9, 2012.

Internet Address (URL) • http.l/wwwepa.goY Recycled/Recyclable' Printed WIth Vegetable 0,1 Based Inks On 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperAgain, thank you for your letter. Ifyou have further questions, please contact me or your staffmay call Josh Lewis in EPA's Office ofCongressional and Intergovernmental Relations at (202) 564-2095. Sincerely, 

# &J0V

Gina McCarthy Assistant Administrator
SEC Connect





 











Exhibit 4.1



 



AMENDMENT NO. 1



TO THE



FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION



OF THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, POWERS AND PREFERENCES



OF THE SERIES B-1 PREFERRED STOCK



OF



PARK CITY GROUP, INC.,



A Nevada corporation


 


 







 



Pursuant to Section 78.1955 of the



Nevada Revised Statutes


 


 







 


On behalf of Park City Group, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”), in accordance with the
provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the
“NRS”),
the Company's Board of Directors and the holders of 100% of the
issued and outstanding shares of Company’s Series B-1
Preferred Stock (the “Series
B-1 Preferred”) have duly
approved and adopted the following resolution amending the
Certificate of Designation of the Relative Rights, Powers and
Preferences of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock (the
“Certificate
of Designation”):


 


RESOLVED, that, pursuant to the authority granted to and
vested in the Board by the provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation of the Company, as amended (the
“Articles of
Incorporation”):


 



1.


The
second paragraph of the Certificate of Incorporation shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:






 


“By resolution, the Board of Directors of
the Corporation has established, designated and fixed the terms,
preferences, limitations and relative rights of up to five hundred
fifty thousand (550,000) shares of the authorized and unissued
preferred stock of the Corporation, par value $0.01 per share, as
“Series B-1 Preferred Stock” (the
“Series B-1 Preferred
Stock”) with the
following rights, preferences, powers, privileges and restrictions,
qualifications and limitations:”


 


 


 


 


 


 



[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 




 








 






 



 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned have
duly signed this Amendment No. 1 to the Certificate of Designation
as of this 20th day of July, 2017.


 


	

 
Park City Group, Inc.


	
 


	

/s/
Edward L. Clissold


	

By: 
Edward L. Clissold


	

Title:   Corporate
Secretary and General Counsel
Terry HERNANDEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Franklin MARTINEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: 3D17-2533

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jennifer HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Bernard CHATTAWAY, Jr. O/B/O N. CHATTAWAY, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3369

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: STANLEY E. PACHECO CASE NUMBER: 21-10746-LMI

JESSICA A. AGUIRRE

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for June 3, 2021 hearing. All amendments and documents for the June 3, 2021 hearing 

were due as of May 17, 2021. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "re-sending" 

documents)

If Counsel for the debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Remains unresolved from prior deficiency

Due by 5 pm on 6/5 or DISMISS, if received Cont. to 7/13: 1) obj/conform to cl#13

Case 21-10746-LMI Doc 30 Filed 05/27/21 Page 1 of 1