### 25232 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 15,
2011. Ray Towles, Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service. Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows: **PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106,
40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721–44722.

■ 2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows: **§§ 97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, § 97.31, 97.33, 97.35 [Amended]** 

By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/ DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or TACAN; § 97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; § 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; § 97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV; § 97.31 RADAR SIAPs; § 97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and § 97.35 COPTER SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

AIRAC

date State City Airport FDC No. FDC date Subject

2–Jun–11 IN Terre Haute ............................ Terre Haute Intl—Hulman Field. 1/2732 4/1/11 VOR/DME RWY 5, Amdt 17C

2–Jun–11 LA Lake Charles .......................... Lake Charles Rgnl ................. 1/2810 4/1/11 RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Orig 2–Jun–11 IL Chicago (West Chicago) ........ Chicago/DuPage .................... 1/3065 4/12/11 VOR OR GPS RWY 2L, Orig&-A 2–Jun–11 IL Chicago (West Chicago) ........ Chicago/DuPage .................... 1/3066 4/12/11 RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig 2–Jun–11 IL Chicago (West Chicago) ........ Chicago/DuPage .................... 1/3067 4/12/11 VOR RWY 10, Amdt 12 2–Jun–11 IL Chicago (West Chicago) ........ Chicago/DuPage .................... 1/3068 4/12/11 ILS OR LOC RWY 2L, Amdt 2 2–Jun–11 IL Chicago (West Chicago) ........ Chicago/DuPage .................... 1/3069 4/12/11 ILS OR LOC RWY 10, Amdt 7B 2–Jun–11 MN Eveleth ................................... Eveleth—Virginia Muni .......... 1/4562 4/1/11 VOR RWY 27, Orig-A 2–Jun–11 PA Zelienople .............................. Zelienople Muni ..................... 1/4697 4/6/11 RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig-B 2–Jun–11 WV Petersburg ............................. Grant County ......................... 1/5884 4/12/11 LDA/DME B, Amdt 32–Jun–11 NC Rocky Mount .......................... Rocky Mount—Wilson Regional. 1/8971 4/7/11 RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1

2–Jun–11 NC Fayetteville ............................. Fayetteville Regional/Grannis Field. 1/8973 4/6/11 VOR RWY 4, Amdt 16

[FR Doc. 2011–10021 Filed 5–3–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 97**

**[Docket No. 30779; Amdt. No. 3422]**

**Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums**  **and Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective May 4, 2011. The compliance date for each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the amendatory provisions.

The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of May 4,
2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the amendment is as follows:

For Examination

1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected airport is located;

3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or

4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/ federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html. Availability —All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free of charge. Visit http:// www.nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:

1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA– 200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or

2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected airport is located.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK. 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) Telephone: (405) 954–4164.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS. The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5


### 25233 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA Forms are FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–4, 8260–5, 8260–15A, and 8260–15B when required by an entry on 8260–15A.

The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition to their complex nature and the need for a special format make publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical. Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of the, associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.

The Rule

This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.

Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in less than 30 days. Conclusion

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘ significant regulatory action ’’ under Executive Order 12866;(2) is not a

‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979) ; and (3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

Air traffic control, airports, Incorporation by reference, and Navigation (Air).

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 15,
2011. Ray Towles, Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service. Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

**PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721–44722.

■ 2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 5 MAY 2011 Greer, SC, Greenville-Spartanburg Intl, ILS

OR LOC RWY 22, Amdt 5 Greer, SC, Greenville-Spartanburg Intl, ILS

OR LOC/DME RWY 4, ILS RWY 4 (SA CAT I), ILS RWY 4 (CAT II), ILS RWY 4 (CAT III), Amdt 23 Greer, SC, Greenville-Spartanburg Intl,

RADAR 1, Amdt 7 Greer, SC, Greenville-Spartanburg Intl, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 2
Effective 2 JUN 2011
Hartford, CT, Hartford-Brainard, LDA RWY 2,

Amdt 1G Hartford, CT, Hartford-Brainard, VOR OR

GPS–A, Amdt 9C Warsaw, IN, Warsaw Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig-A Greenville, MI, Greenville Muni, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2A Fulton, NY, Oswego County, ILS OR LOC

RWY 33, Amdt 1 Fulton, NY, Oswego County, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 15, Orig Fulton, NY, Oswego County, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 33, Orig Westerly, RI, Westerly State, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Effective 30 JUN 2011 Anchorage, AK, Merill Field, RNAV (GPS)–

A, Amdt 1 Anchorage, AK, Merill Field, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, RNAV (GPS) RWY

7, Amdt 1 Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, RNAV (GPS) RWY

25, Amdt 1 Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, Takeoff Minimums

and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2 Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, VOR RWY 7, Amdt

7 Galena, AK, Edward G. Pitka Sr, VOR/DME

RWY 7, Amdt 7B Galena, AK, Edward G. Pitka Sr, VOR/DME

RWY 25, Amdt 10B Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY

19R, Amdt 4 Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY

1L, Amdt 2 Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY

19R, Amdt 2 Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, VOR RWY 19R,

Amdt 19 Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, VOR/DME RWY 1L,

Amdt 8 Wasilla, AK, Wasilla, Takeoff Minimums and

Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 Demopolis, AL, Demopolis Muni, NDB RWY

4, Amdt 1, CANCELLED Fayette, AL, Richard Arthur Field, NDB RWY

18, Amdt 1, CANCELLED Camden, AR, Harrell Field, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix Sky Harbor Intl, ILS

OR LOC/DME RWY 7L, Amdt 11 Firebaugh, CA, Firebaugh, RNAV (GPS)–B,

Orig Firebaugh, CA, Firebaugh, VOR/DME–A,

Amdt 3 Riverside/Rubidoux, CA, Flabob, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig Cornelia, GA, Habersham County, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4 Lawrenceville, GA, Gwinnett County-Briscoe

Field, ILS OR LOC RWY 25, Amdt 2 Lawrenceville, GA, Gwinnett County-Briscoe

Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Orig Lawrenceville, GA, Gwinnett County-Briscoe

Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig Swainsboro, GA, Emanuel County, ILS OR

LOC/DME RWY 13, Orig Swainsboro, GA, Emanuel County, LOC/NDB

RWY 13, Amdt 1, CANCELLED Swainsboro, GA, Emanuel County, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1 Swainsboro, GA, Emanuel County, RNAV

(GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1 Patterson, LA, Harry P Williams Memorial,

NDB RWY 6, Amdt 11 Slidell, LA, Slidell, Takeoff Minimums and

Obstacle DP, Orig


### 25234 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Norridgewock, ME, Central Maine Arpt of

Norridgewock, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3 Cadillac, MI, Wexford County, NDB RWY 7,

Amdt 2B, CANCELLED Cadillac, MI, Wexford County, NDB RWY 25,

Amdt 2, CANCELLED Drummond Island, MI, Drummond Island,

NDB RWY 26, Amdt 1, CANCELLED Harrisonville, MO, Lawrence Smith

Memorial, VOR/DME RWY 35, Orig-A,
CANCELLED Lincoln Park, NJ, Lincoln Park, NDB RWY 1,

Amdt 3, CANCELLED Clovis, NM, Clovis Muni, Takeoff Minimums

and Obstacle DP, Orig Lima, OH, Lima Allen County, VOR RWY 28,

Amdt 16A, CANCELLED Chickasha, OK, Chickasha Muni, Takeoff

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig Seven Springs Borough, PA, Seven Springs,

Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig,
CANCELLED Seven Springs Borough, PA, Seven Springs,

VOR OR GPS-A, Amdt 2A, CANCELLED Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, PA, Wilkes-Barre/

Scranton Intl, NDB–A, Amdt 17A Panhandle, TX, Panhandle-Carson County,

GPS RWY 35, Orig-A, CANCELLED Panhandle, TX, Panhandle-Carson County,

RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig Panhandle, TX, Panhandle-Carson County,

RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig Panhandle, TX, Panhandle-Carson County,

Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig Panhandle, TX, Panhandle-Carson County,

VOR RWY 17, Orig, CANCELLED Panhandle, TX, Panhandle-Carson County,

VOR–A, Orig Blacksburg, VA, Virginia Tech/Montgomery

Executive, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5 Dublin, VA, New River Valley, ILS OR LOC

Y RWY 6, Orig Dublin, VA, New River Valley, ILS OR LOC

Z RWY 6, Amdt 5 Dublin, VA, New River Valley, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 6, Orig Dublin, VA, New River Valley, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 24, Amdt 1 Dublin, VA, New River Valley, VOR–A,

Amdt 9 Dublin, VA, New River Valley, VOR/DME

RWY 6, Amdt 8 Yakima, WA, Yakima Air Terminal/

Mcallister Field, COPTER NDB RWY 27, Amdt 2 Saratoga, WY, Shively Field, RNAV (GPS)

RWY 5, Orig

[FR Doc. 2011–10018 Filed 5–3–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**  **HUMAN SERVICES**

**Food and Drug Administration**

**21 CFR Part 73**

**[Docket No. FDA–2009–C–0543]**

**Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Reactive Blue 69** 

**AGENCY :**  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of disodium 1-amino-4-[[4- [(2-bromo-1-oxoallyl)amino]-2-sulphonatophenyl]amino]-9,10-dihydro9,10-dioxoanthracene-2-sulphonate (CAS Reg. No. 70209–99–3), also known as Reactive Blue 69, as a color additive in contact lenses. This action is in response to a petition filed by Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective June 6, 2011. Submit either electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing by June 3, 2011. See section VII of this document for information on the filing of objections.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit either electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing, identified by Docket No. FDA–2009–C–0543, by any of the following methods:

Electronic Submissions

Submit electronic objections in the following ways:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Written Submissions

Submit written objections in the following ways:

• FAX: 301–827–6870.

• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA– 305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name and Docket No. FDA–2009–C–0543 for this rulemaking. All objections received will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting objections, see the ‘‘ Objections ’’ heading of the **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of this document.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or objections received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov and insert the docket numbers, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the

‘‘ Search’’ box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Raphael A. Davy, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740– 3835, 240–402–1272.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Introduction

In a notice published in the Federal Register of November 18, 2009 (74 FR 59560), FDA announced that a color additive petition (CAP 8C0287) had been filed by Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 49–53 York St., Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 3LP, United Kingdom. The petition proposed to amend the color additive regulations in part 73 (21 CFR part 73), subpart D, Medical Devices, to provide for the safe use of disodium 1-amino-4-[[4-[(2-bromo-1- oxoallyl)amino]-2-sulphonatophenyl]amino]-9,10-dihydro9,10-dioxoanthracene-2-sulphonate (Reactive Blue 69) (CAS Reg. No. 70209–99–3, Colour Index No. 612037) as a color additive in contact lenses. The petition was filed under section 721 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 379e). II. Safety Evaluation

Under section 721(b)(4) of the FD&C Act, a color additive may not be listed for a particular use unless a fair evaluation of the data and information available to FDA establishes that the color additive is safe for that use. FDA’s color additive regulations at 21 CFR 70.3(i) define safe to mean that there is

‘‘ convincing evidence that establishes with reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the intended use of the color additive. ’’

During its review of the safety of the use of Reactive Blue 69 pigment in contact lenses, the Agency considered the exposure to the color additive from the petitioned use. Based on information submitted in the petition, the Agency notes that it is highly unlikely that Reactive Blue 69 will migrate out of the contact lens into the aqueous environment of the eye because the color additive is covalently incorporated (copolymerized) into the polymeric lens matrix. Therefore, the Agency concludes that the exposure to the color additive, including any impurities that may be present in it,