alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Gene Hodges, Chief Executive Officer of Websense, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement
set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Websense, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the period
covered by the Quarterly Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ GENE HODGES        
|                      |  |     |  | Gene Hodges            
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by Websense, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Quarterly Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of Websense, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Universal Food
& Beverage Company and subsidiaries (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ralph M. Passino, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Ralph M. Passino                      
|                      |  | Ralph M. Passino                          
|                      |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided by Universal Food & Beverage Company and will be retained by Universal Food & Beverage Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX PARTE Girlis H. SERRATT

1160601 (CR-16-0120)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)

## By Location

              - arizona(6)
              - (-)california(4)
              - colorado(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        January 26, 2017        PubTalk 1/2017 — Unusual sources of tsunamis

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars
Dominique SHAVUO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-985

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Mediacom Broadband LLC (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rocco
B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. March 30, 2006
    
    By:
    
/s/
Rocco B.
CommissoRocco
B. Commisso
     Chief Executive Officer March 30, 2006
    
    By:
    
/s/
Mark E.
StephanMark E. Stephan
     Chief Financial Officer 84
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 95229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28162]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Transportation Security Administration

[Docket No. TSA-2011-0008]

Aviation Security Advisory Committee; Public Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Transportation Security Administration, DHS.

ACTION: Committee management; notice of open Federal advisory committee 
meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to a notice published in the 
Federal Register on November 22, 2024, which included an incorrect date 
for an upcoming public meeting of the Aviation Security Advisory 
Committee (ASAC). TSA erroneously stated that the meeting would be held 
on Thursday, December 11, 2024. TSA is revising the date to Wednesday, 
December 11, 2024.

DATES: Applicable December 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamika McCree Elhilali, Aviation 
Security Advisory Committee, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security 
Administration, 6595 Springfield Center Drive, (TSA-28), Springfield, 
Virginia 20598, [email protected], 571-227-2632.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 22, 2024 (89 FR 92699), TSA 
published a notice which involves a public meeting of the ASAC. In the 
first sentence after the DATES section, TSA erroneously stated that the 
meeting would take place on Thursday, December 11, 2024. TSA is 
revising the date to read Wednesday, December 11, 2024. Accordingly, 
the sentence has been revised to correct the date of the meeting.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 22, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-
27441, on page 92700, in the first column, line 17, correct the DATES 
discussion paragraph to read:
    The meeting will take place on Wednesday, December 11, 2024. The 
meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. and adjourn at 1:00 p.m., Eastern 
Standard Time (EST). As listed in the Public Participation section 
below, requests to attend the meeting, to address the ASAC, and/or for 
accommodations because of a disability, must be received by November 
29, 2024.

    Dated November 25, 2024.
Eddie D. Mayenschein,
Assistant Administrator, Policy, Plans, and Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2024-28162 Filed 11-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-05-P
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Tisha Lanette Burwell, * From the 244th District Court

 of Ector County

Trial Court No. C-42,078.

Vs. No. 11-18-00220-CR * August 1, 2019

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Fund American Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Michael Miller,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 28, 2007 | /s/ T. MICHAEL  MILLER                  |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| ** **                | T. Michael Miller                       |
|                      | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of EcoEnergy Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAN
E. CHASON, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 /s/JAN E.
      CHASONName:
              
              Jan
      E. ChasonDate:
              
              November
      23, 2009
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Mark S. Clayton, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Nova Star
Innovations, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

                                  /s/ Mark S. Clayton
Date: March 12, 2004              ____________________________________
                                  Mark S. Clayton
                                  Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
Communication Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Michael Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ Michael Zwebner
Dated: August 13, 2003                    -----------------------------------
                                          Michael Zwebner
                                          Chief Executive Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5228 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic in Traverse City, Michigan, as the ‘‘Colonel Demas T. Craw VA Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2016 

Mr. BENISHEK (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. AMASH, Mr. 

MOOLENAAR, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. UPTON, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. BISHOP of 

Michigan, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. TROTT, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. CONYERS, and Mrs. LAWRENCE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Traverse City, Michigan, as 

the ‘‘Colonel Demas T. Craw VA Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COLONEL DEMAS T. CRAW VA CLINIC. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af5 fairs community-based outpatient clinic in Traverse City, 

6 Michigan, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 

7 be known and designated as the ‘‘Colonel Demas T. Craw 

8 VA Clinic’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5228 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the community-based outpatient clinic referred 

4 to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to 

5 the ‘‘Colonel Demas T. Craw VA Clinic’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Solomon ROBERTS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied as moot.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Oort Cloud

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(1)

## By Location

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1998        Impact cratering through geologic time
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 61181

Hortencia Velazquez Adame; Everardo Perez Velazquez; Luis Aldeir Perez Velazquez; Arileny Perez Velazquez,

Petitioners ,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General ,
Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A208 925 454 BIA No. A208 925 455 BIA No. A208 925 456 BIA No. A208 925 457

Before Jones, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 15, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-61181 Document: 00516358972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2022No. 20

- 61181

2 Hortencia Velazquez Adame, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from the denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 1

We review the BIA’s decision and consider the immigration judge’s decision only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Singh v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 220, 224 (5th Cir. 2018). Factual findings are reviewed for substantial evidence and legal determinations are reviewed de novo. Lopez

- Gomez v. Ashcroft , 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001).

Because Velazquez Adame failed to exhaust her claims concerning the validity of her notice to appear and her membership in a particular social

group (PSG) consisting of those who have cooperated with law enforcement officials we lack jurisdiction to consider them. See Flores

- Abarca v. Barr , 937 F.3d 473, 477

- 78 (5th Cir. 2019) ; Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004) . She identifies no error in the BIA’s determination that she was ineligible for asylum or withholding of relief because she failed to show membership in a cognizable PSG. See Orellana

- Monson v. Holder , 685 F.3d 511, 518 (5th Cir. 2012). Finally, because her argument concerning her CAT
claim is speculative, she has not shown that substantial evidence compels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA on this issue. See Morales v. Sessions , 860 F.3d 812, 818 (5th Cir. 2017); Chen v. Gonzales , 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006) . The petition for review is DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part

.

1 Hortencia Velazqu ez Adame is the lead applicant, and the other three derivative applicants are her children. Case: 20-61181 Document: 00516358972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2022
Robert SAGER, Appellant, v. Hatice HOLGREN, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3607

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018

Robert Sager, pro se, Appellant.

Bert Moore, Crestview, for Appellee.

Bilbrey, J.

Appellant is the father and Appellee the mother of a minor child. Appellant filed a petition for injunction for protection *794against domestic violence on behalf of the child against Appellee as respondent. *See* § 741.30, Fla. Stat. A temporary injunction was entered but then dismissed, and entry of a permanent injunction was denied, based on the court's finding insufficient evidence to support entry of a permanent injunction. Following the dismissal, the trial court awarded Appellee $500.00 attorney's fees based her amended motion for fees brought pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes. Appellant challenges that award in this appeal.

Section 741.30(1)(g), Florida Statutes, prohibits an award of attorney's fees "in any proceeding under this section." Appellant argues that the fee awarded to Appellee was prohibited by that statute. Appellee responds that the action brought by Appellant was governed by section 784.046, Florida Statutes, dealing with repeat violence and not section 741.30 dealing with domestic violence because Appellant filed his petition for injunction on behalf of his minor child regarding threats or acts of violence which Appellant alleged occurred while the child resided with Appellee. Appellee correctly notes that section 784.046 does not contain the same prohibition on attorney's fees as section 741.30. In *Lopez v. Hall* , 233 So.3d 451 (Fla. 2018), the Florida Supreme Court approved our earlier holding that an award of attorney's fees under section 57.105, is permissible in actions for dating, repeat, and sexual violence injunctions brought under section 784.046.

However, the fact that Appellant filed his petition on behalf of the minor child, rather than on his own behalf, did not establish the action as one for repeat violence under section 784.046. An adult parent has standing to petition for an injunction against domestic violence on behalf of his or her child where the violence is alleged to occur in the other parent's household. *G.C. v. R.S.* , 71 So.3d 164, 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding that a former spouse has standing to seek injunction against domestic violence against the other former spouse on behalf of parties' children). The fact that these parents were never married does not deprive Appellant of his standing to seek protection from domestic violence on behalf of his child under section 741.30(1)(e).

The petition and orders in the trial court were standard Florida Supreme Court approved family law forms which consistently referred to domestic violence, not repeat violence. The record plainly shows that the parties and the trial court proceeded under section 741.30, and the award of attorney's fees was thus prohibited. The order on appeal is therefore

REVERSED .

Wolf, J., concurs, Kelsey, J., concurs in result.