September 10

, 2015

Exemption No. 12817 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

− 20 15

− 2600

Mr. Robert Spitz Spitz Industrial Design, LLC

31 Edgewood Run Amherst, NH 03031

Dear Mr. Spitz :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

By letter dated June 3, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Spitz Industrial Design, LLC ( hereinafter petitioner or o perator ) for an exemption

. The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial video and photography to be used in construction and industrial infrastructure projects and land development planning and review

.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the proposed operations and

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a DJI Inspire 1

.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates

. In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in2

c onsideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the re quested relief from

14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection 1

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11 062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Spitz Industrial Design, LLC is gran ted an exemption

from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data

collection

. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (part iculate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by

instruments aboard the UA.3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Spitz Industrial Design, LLC is hereafter referred to as

the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exempt ion are limited to the DJI Inspire 1 when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are

not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or
U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PI C always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditi ons and limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents,4

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating

docum ents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The
operator must a lso present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator mus t petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that aff ect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC wi th a VO and must remain at

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to en sure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

, i noperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the

UAS is found to be in a condi tion for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufa cturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a
current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s l icense issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight revi ew requirements specified in

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However,

traini ng operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During

traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with app ropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the ai rport symbo l as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport manage ment must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the P IC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve

power recomme nded by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it inten ds to conduct operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.6

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Nu mber) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be av ailable to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonpartici pating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensurin g the safety of nonparticipating persons ; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property w ith permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that tran sgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported

to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTS B) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.7

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditi ons and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities

must include at least the f ollowing:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and ser ial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list o f those who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to,
parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.8

This exemption termin ates on September 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

EnclosuresSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 1 UNITED	STATES	OF	AMERICA

DEPARTMENT	OF	TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL	AVIATION	ADMINISTRATION
WASHINGTON,	DC

Regulatory	Docket	No.	_______________

IN	THE	MATTER	OF	THE	PETITION	FOR	EXEMPTION	OF: Spitz	Industrial	Design ,	LLC

FOR	AN	EXEMPTION	SEEKING	RELIEF	FROM	THE	REQUIREMENTS	OF	TITLE	14

OF	THE	CODE	OF	FEDERAL	REGULATIONS	SECTIONS 21	subpart	H, 61.113(a)	& (b),	91.7(a),	91.121,	91.151(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2), AND	91.417(a)	&	(b)	CONCERNING	COMMERCI AL	OPERATION	OF	THE	DJI

INSPIRE	1	UNMANNED	AIRCRAFT	SYSTEM	PURSUANT	TO	SECTION	333	OF	THE FAA	MODERNIZATION	AND	REFORM	ACT	OF	2012	(PUBLIC	LAW	112

- 95)

Submitted	on June 3 ,	2015

Robert	Spitz Spitz	Industrial	Design ,	LLC 31	Edgewood	Run Amherst, NH	03031

603

- 420

- 8025 rspitz@spitzindustrial.comSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 2 TABLE	OF	CONTENTS

GLOSSARY	O F	ABBREVIATIONS PAGE	3

SUMMARY PAGE	4

INTRODUCTI ON	AND	INTEREST	OF	PETITIONERS PAGE 4

BACKGROUND PAGE 5

BASIS	FOR	PETITION PAGE 6

N AME	AND	ADDRESS	OF PETITIONERS PAGE 8

THE	SPECIFIC	SECTIONS	OF	14	C.F.R.	FROM PAGE 8

WHICH SPITZ	INDUSTRIAL	DES IGN

SEEKS	EXEMPTION

THE	EXTENT	OF	RELIEF SPITZ	INDUSTRIAL	DES IGN PAGE 10

SEEK	AND	THE	REASON SPITZ	INDUSTRIAL	DES IGN

SEEKS	THE	RELIEF

THE	REASONS	WHY GRANTING	REQUEST	WO ULD	BE	IN PAGE 13

THE	PUBLIC	INTEREST

THE	REASONS	WHY	GRANTING	THE	EXEMPTION	WOUL D PAGE 15

NOT	ADVERSELY	AFFECT SAFETY

A	SUMMA RY	THAT	CAN	BE	PUBLISHED	IN	THE PAGE 27

FEDE RAL	REGISTER

CONCLUSION PAGE 28

APPENDIX PAGE 29Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 3 GLOSSARY	OF	ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above	Ground	Level

AMA Academy	of	Model	Aeronautics

AOI Area	Of	Interest

ATC Air	Traffic	Control

ATO Air	Traffic	Organization

AUVSI Association	for	Unmanned	Vehicle	Systems	International

AV Aerial	Vehicle

CFR Code	of	Federal	Regulations

COA Certificate	of	Authorization

FAA Federal	Aviation	Administration

FAR Federal	Aviation	Regulation

GCS Ground	Control	Station

GPS Global	Positioning	System

LOL Loss	of	Link

PIC Pilot In	Command

Section 333 FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012	(FMRA)

Section	333

SO Safety	Observer

SOP Standard	Operating	Procedure

UA Unmanned	Aircraft

UAS Unmanned	Aircraft	System

VFR Visual	Flight	Rules

VLOS Visual	Line	Of Sight

VMC Visual	Meteorological	Conditions

VTOL Vertical	Takeoff	And	LandingSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 4 SUMMARY

Robert	Spitz,	ow ner	of	Spitz	Industrial	Design LLC

, ( h ereafter	referred	to	as Spitz Industrial	Design), seeks	exemption	from	the	requirements	of	14	C.F.R	§§	21 subpart	H,	61.113(a)	&	(b),	91.7(a),	91.121,	91.151(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b),	to	operate	an	Unmanned	Aircraft	System pursuant	to	Section	333	of	the	FAA	M odernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012	(FMRA). This	exemption	will	permit Spitz	Indus trial	Design to	operate	an	Unmanned	Aircraft System	(UAS)	for	the	commercial	purpose	of	conducting	aerial	video	and photography	to	be	used	in construction	&	industrial	infras tructure	projects	and	land development planning	and	review, over	certain	areas	of	the	United	States.

INTRODUCTION	AND	INTEREST	OF	THE	PETITIONER

Robert	Spitz is	the	owner	of Spitz	Industrial	Design located	in Amherst,	New Hampshire

. Sp itz	Industrial	Desi gn was	founded	in	2007

. Robert	Spit z	&	his	partner John	Spitz	have	extensive	experience	with Radio	Control	(R/C) flight. John is designated as PIC and head	of operations .	John has	1 5	years	of	Radio	Control	(R/C)

a ircraft flight	experience. John	is highly skilled	in	RC	fixed	wing,	helicopter,	and

multi

- rotor	operation	&	flight. John	personally	serves	as	the	field	marshal	at	the

Southern New	Hampshire	Flying	Eagles,	a	local	community	AMA R/C	club	airfield. John	is a	qualified	AMA	R/C	aircraft	flight	instruct or. John also serves	as	a n advisor

in personal s UAS	vehicles	to	the	local	comm unity	builder	maker	space,	MakeI t	Labs, in	Nashua,	New	Hampshire.

John ’s educational	background	is	in	aviation	technology	and	mechanical engineeri ng.	He	is a trained Airframe	& Power	P lant aircraft	mechanic.

Both	Robert	and	John	Spitz have over	3 years	of	experience	with	hundreds	of	hours

with s UAS	for	recreational	use. John has	accrued 20 hours	as	PIC	with	the	DJI	Inspire

1	model	UAS

. Spitz	Industrial	Design	has taught	cours es	in	safely	flying &	using personal s UAS	vehi cles	for	recreational	purposes,	including FAA,	AMA,	and	AUVSI guidelines	and	regulations.

Spitz	Industrial	Design has	clients	in	the Industrial	Construction,	Land	Development,

arenas	as	well	as	e du cational institutions .	The	objective	of Spitz	Industrial	Design is

to facilitate	ecologically	sound,	lower	impact	development	projects for	a	variet y	of commercial	and	public	uses.	Spitz	Industrial	Design also	wishes	to	serve	as	a	model and	provide	training	safe	and effective	professional	usage	of	UAS	operations	in	our community.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 5 BACKGROUND

Unmanned	Aircraft	Systems:	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS

Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	an	exe mption	to	operate	DJI	systems	f or	compensation or	hire	within	the	NAS.	The	DJI	Inspire	1 is	a	vertical	takeoff	and	landing	(VTOL) Unmanned	Aircraft	(UA)	with	a	Ground	Control	Station	(GCS)	utilizing	electronic tablet	or	smart	phone	systems.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	has	a	maximum	gross	weight	of	6 pounds	7.5	ounces,	a	length	of	17.3	inches,	width	of	1 7.7	inches,	height	of	11.8 inches,	and	a	maximum	speed	of	approximately	42	knots.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	is equipped	with	four	main	rotors;	driven	by	Lithium	Polymer	battery	powered electric	motors.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	that	will	be	operated by	Spitz	Industr ial	Design will	be	registered	in	accordance	with	49	U.S.C.	44103, Registration	of	Aircraft ,	as well	as	14	C.F.R	Part	47, Aircraft	Registration ,	and	marked	in	accordance	with	14 C.F.R.	Part	45, Identification	and	Registration	Marking

.

The	Inspire	1	UAS is	a highly	improved model from the previous DJI popular	and reliable	DJI	Phantom	series.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	is	a	6.47lb	multi

- rotor	(4	rotors)	UAS with	approximately	18	minutes	of	endurance.	The	Inspire	1’s	purpose	is	to	carry	a small	camera	as	its	payload .	The	Inspire	1	has	the	ability	to	be	controlled	by	a	single crewmember	acting	as	pilot	in	command	by	wireless	remote	control	on	a	2.4GHz band	having	a	transmitting	distance	of	2km	(1.08nm). The	Inspire	1	is	equipped with	lost	link	protection	(referred	t o	as	“Return	To	Home”	(RTH)	in	the	Inspire	1 User	Manual),	allowing	the	UAS	to	automatically	climb	vertically	to	a	safe	altitude	to clear	obstacles;	then	proceed	to	a	pre

- designated	point	to	automatically	land.	At anytime	the	UAS	and	the	controller	reestab lish	link,	the	PIC	can	cancel	the	RTH	and resume	control	of	the	UAS.	In	the	event	of	lost	GPS	signal,	control	to	the	Inspire	UAS is	not	lost.	Since	all	operations	will	be	conducted	under	Visual	Line	of	Sight	VLOS	the

PIC	can	control	the	aircraft	back	to	a safe	location	to	land.

The	DJI	Inspire	UAS	operates	on	the	2.4GHz	frequency	band	for	both	UAS	control	as well	as	video	downlink.	Both	the	Inspire	1	UAS	as	well	and	the	UAS	remote controller	comply	with	part	15	of	the	FCC	rules	(see	page	appendix	A,	page	62	of	the DJI	Inspire	use r	manual).	The	Inspire	1	is	equipped	with	a	vision	positioning	system along	with	a	sonar	system	in	order	to	be	able	to	fly	inside	a	building	and	still	remain stable.	The	Inspire	1’s	primary	payload	is	a	small	X3	model	FC350	camera	mounted

with	a	Zenmuse	X3 gimbal.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 6 BASIS	FOR	PETITION

Petitioner, Robert	Spitz of Spitz	Industrial	Design pursuant	to	the	provisions	of	the Federal	Aviation	Regulations	(14	C.F.R.	§	11.61)	and	the	FAA	Modernization	and Reform	Act	of	2012	(FMRA),	Section	333, Special	R ules	for	Certain	Unmanned Aircraft	Systems ,	hereby	petition	the	Administrator	to	commercially	operate	the	DJI Inspire	1	UAS	in	the	National	Airspace	System	(NAS),	and	for	an	exemption	from	the requirements	of	14	C.F.R	§§	21	subpart	H,	61.113(a)	&	(b),	91.7 (a),	91.121, 91.151(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b).

In	consideration	of	the	speed,	weight,	size,	and	limited	operating	area	associated with	the	unmanned	aircraft	and	its	operation, Spitz	Industrial	Design ‘s operat ion	of the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	meets	the	conditions	of	FMRA	Section	333	and	therefore,	will not	require	an	airworthiness	certificate	in	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	Part	21, Subpart	H.

Accordingly, Spitz	Industrial	Design requests	relief	from	Sections	91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b),	as	these	sections	set	forth requirements	for	maintenance	that	only	apply	to	aircraft	with	an	airworthiness

certificate.

Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that the	requested	relief	is	proper	since	an equivalent	level	of	safety	will	be	ensured. Spitz	Industrial	Design will	use experienced	personnel	or	technicians	to	perform	maintenance,	alterations,	or preventive	maintenance	on	the	UAS	using	the	methods,	techniqu es,	and	practices prescribed	in	the	operating	documents	(i. e.,	Monthly	Maintenance	Log, DJI	Inspire	1

Instruction	Manual ,	and	will	follow company aircraft	maintenance	procedures. This

includes follow ing the	manufactures	recommended	inspection	interval	to preform comprehensive	maintenance	of	the	Inspire	1	every 50	flight	hours	or	200	flights. Furthermore, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	document	and	maintain	all	maintenance records	for	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS.

Relief	from	certain	requirements	of	Section	61.113 (a)	and	(b),	entitled Private	pilot privileges	and	limitations:	Pilot	in	command ,	is	requested	by chief	of	operations to the	extent	necessary	to	allow	a	Pilot	in	Command	(PIC)

, holding	an	airman	medical certificate,	and qualified as	an AMA	R/C	flight instructor ,	and	who	has demonstrated,	by	meeting	minimum	flight

- hour	and	currency	requirements,	that the	PIC	is	able	to	safely	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	in	a	manner	consistent	with this	exemption,	including	evasive	and	emergency	maneuvers and maintain ing appropriate	distances	from	people,	vessels,	vehicles	and	structures.

Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	relief	from	Section	91.7(a),	entitled Civil	aircraft

airworthiness ,	because	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	does	not	require	an	airworthiness

certificate	in	accor dance	with	14	C.F.R.	Part	21,	Subpart	H.	As	such, Spitz	Industrial Design submits	that	they	will	ensure	that	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	is	in	an	airworthy condition,	prior	to	every	flight,	by	determining	that	the	UAS	are	in	compliance	withSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 7 the	operating	documen ts	(i.e.,	Monthly	Maintenance	Log,	and	DJI	Inspire	1

Instruction	Manual ,	and	company	maintenance	procedures ),	and	that	the	aircraft are	in	a	condition	for	safe	flight.

Spitz	Industrial	Design also	seeks	an	exemption	from	the	requirements	of	Section

91.121 ,	entitled Altimeter	Settings ,	as	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	will	not	have	a	typical barometric	altimeter	onboard.	However,	altitude	information	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1UA will	be	provided	to	the	PIC	via	Global	Positioning	System	(GPS)	equipment	and	radio

communicat ions	telemetry	data	link,	which	downlinks	from	the	UA	to	the	GCS	for active	monitoring	of	the	flight	path.	This	altitude	information,	combined	with Spitz Industrial	Design’s operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	within	visual	line	of	sight,	at	or

below	500	fee t	AGL,	will	ensure	a	level	of	safety	equivalent	to	Section	91.121.

Additionally, Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	an	exemption	from	the	requirements	of Section	91.151(b),	entitled Fuel	requirements	for	flight	in	VFR	conditions

. Spitz Industrial	Design submit s	that	safety	will	not	be	affected	by	operation	of	the	DJI Inspire	1	UA	during	daylight	hours	in	visual	meteorological	conditions	(VMC)	under visual	flight	rules	(VFR),	with	enough	battery	power	to	fly	for	a	total	duration	of approximately	13.5	minutes	to the	first	point	of	intended	landing	and,	assuming normal	cruising	speed,	to	fly	after	that	for	at	least	4.5	minutes.

In	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	§	11.81, Spitz	Industrial	Design provides	the	following information	in	support	of	their	petition	for	exemptio n:Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 8 A.	Name	and	Address	Of	The	Petitioner

Robert	Spitz, Spitz	Industrial	Design LLC ,	31	Edgewood	Run	Amherst,	NH	03031 rspitz@spitzindustrial.com ,	Phone	603

- 420

- 8025.

B.	The	Specific	Sections	Of	14	C.F.R.	From	Which Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks Exemption.

1. Spitz	Industri al	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section Part	21,	Subpart	H

14	C.F.R.	Part	21,	Subpart	H,	establishes	the	procedural	requirements for	the issuance	of	airworthiness	certificates	as	required	by	14	C.F.R.	§91.203(a)(1)

2. Spitz	Industr ial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section 61.113(a)	and	(b).

Section	61.113,	entitled	Private	pilot	privileges	and	limitations: Pilot in	command

, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe	the	following,	in	relevant	part: (a) No	person	who holds	a	private	pilot	certificate	may	act	as	a	pilot	in	command	(PIC)	of	an	aircraft that	is	carrying	passengers	or	property	for	compensation	or	hire;	nor	may that person,	for	compensation	or	hire,	act	as	PIC	of	an	aircraft. (b) A	private	pilot	may, for	compensation	or	hire,	act	as	PIC	of	an	aircraft	in	connection	with	any	business	or employment	if

—

(1) The	flight	is	only	incidental	to	that	business	or	employm ent;	and (2) The	aircraft does	not	carry	passengers	or	property	for	compensation	or	hire.

3. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section 91.7(a).

Section	91.7,	entitled civil	aircraft	airworthiness ,	subsection	(a),	states	the following: (a) No	person	may	operate	a	civil	aircraft	unless	it	is	in	an	airworthy	condition.

4. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section

91.121.

Section	91.121,	entitled	Altimeter	settings,	subsection	(a),	states	the	fol lowing,	in

part: (a) Each	person	operating	an	aircraft	shall	maintain	the	cruising	altitude	or flight	level	of	that	aircraft,	as	the	case	may	be,	by	reference	to	an	altimeter	that	is	set, when	operating

-- (1) Below	18,000	feet	MSL,	to

-- (i) The	current	rep orted	altimeter setting	of	a	station	along	the	route	and	within	100	nautical	miles	of	the	aircraft; (ii) If	there	is	no	station	within	the	area	prescribed	in	paragraph (a)(1)(i) of	this section,	the	current	reported	altimeter	setting	of	an	appropriate	avai lable	station;

or (iii) In	the	case	of	an	aircraft	not	equipped	with	a	radio,	the	elevation	of	the departure	airport	or	an	appropriate	altimeter	setting	available	before	departure.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 9 5. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Sectio n 91.151(b).

Section	91.151,	entitled Fuel	requirements	for	flight	in	VFR	conditions ,	subsection (b), states	the	following: (b) No	person	may	begin	a	flight	in	a	rotorcraft	under	VFR conditions	unless	(considering	wind	and	forecast	weather	conditions)	there	is	enough fuel	to	fly	to	the	first	point	of	intended	landing	and,	assuming	normal	cruising	speed,	to fly	after	that	for	at	lea st	20	minutes.

6. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirement	Of	Section 91.405(a).

Section	91.405,	entitled Maintenance	required ,	subsection	(a),	states	the	following: Each	owner	or	operator	of	an	aircraft

— (a) Shall	have	that	aircraft inspected	as prescribed	in	subpart	E	of	this	part	and	shall	between	required	inspections,	except as	provided	in	paragraph	(c)	of	this	section,	have	discrepancies	repaired	as prescribed	in	part	43	of	this	chapter[.]

7. Spitz	I ndustrial	Design Seeks	Exempti on	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section	91.407,	entitled Operation	after	maintenance,	preventive	maintenance, rebuilding,	or	alteration ,	subsection	(a)(1),	states	the	following: (a) No	person	may operate	any	aircraft	that	has	undergone	ma intenance,	preventive	maintenance, rebuilding,	or	alteration	unless

-- (1) It	has	been	approved	for	return	to	service	by	a person	authorized	under	§	43.7	of	this	chapter[.]

8. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of

Sections	91.409 (a)(1)	And	91.409(a)(2).

Section	91.409,	entitled Inspections ,	subsection	(a),	states	the	following: (a) Except as	provided	in	paragraph	(c)	of	this	section,	no	person	may	operate	an	aircraft unless,	within	the	preceding	12	calendar	months,	it	has	had

-- (1) An	annual inspection	in	accordance	with	part	43	of	this	chapter	and	has	been	approved	for return	to	service	by	a	person	authorized	by	§	43.7	of	this	chapter;	or (2) An inspection	for	the	issuance	of	an	airworthiness	certificate	in	accordance	with	part 21	of	this	chapter.

9. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of Sections	91.417(a)	And	91.417(b).

Section	91.417,	entitled Maintenance	records ,	subsections	(a)	and	(b),	state	the following:	(a)	Except	for	work	performed	in	accorda nce	with	§§	91.411	and	91.413, each	registered	owner	or	operator	shall	keep	the	following	records	for	the	periods specified	in	paragraph	(b)	of	this	section:	(1)	Records	of	the	maintenance, preventive	maintenance,	and	alteration	and	records	of	the	100

- hour ,	annual, progressive,	and	other	required	or	approved	inspections,	as	appropriate,	for	eachSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 10 aircraft	(including	the	airframe)	and	each	engine,	propeller,	rotor,	and	appliance	of

an	aircraft.	The	records	must	include

--

(i)	A	description	(or	reference	to	da ta	acceptable	to	the	Administrator)	of	the	work performed;	and	(ii)	The	date	of	completion	of	the	work	performed;	and	(iii)	The signature,	and	certificate	number	of	the	person	approving	the	aircraft	for	return	to

service.

(2)	Records	containing	the	follow ing	information:	(i)	The	total	time	in	service	of	the airframe,	each	engine,	each	propeller,	and	each	rotor.	(ii)	The	current	status	of	life

limited	parts	of	each	airframe,	engine,	propeller,	rotor,	and	appliance.	(iii)	The	time

since	last	overhaul	of	all items	installed	on	the	aircraft	which	are	required	to	be overhauled	on	a	specified	time	basis.	(iv)	The	current	inspection	status	of	the aircraft,	including	the	time	since	the	last	inspection	required	by	the	inspection program	under	which	the	aircraft	and its	appliances	are	maintained.	(v)	The	current status	of	applicable	airworthiness	directives	(AD)	and	safety	directives	including, for	each,	the	method	of	compliance,	the	AD	or	safety	directive	number	and	revision date.	If	the	AD	or	safety	directive	involv es	recurring	action,	the	time	and	date	when the	next	action	is	required.	(vi)	Copies	of	the	forms	prescribed	by	§	43.9(d)	of	this chapter	for	each	major	alteration	to	the	airframe	and	currently	installed	engines, rotors,	propellers,	and	appliances.	(b)	The owner	or	operator	shall	retain	the following	records	for	the	periods	prescribed:	(1)	The	records	specified	in	paragraph (a)(1)	of	this	section	shall	be	retained	until	the	work	is	repeated	or	superseded	by other	work	or	for	1	year	after	the	work	is	perform ed.	(2)	The	records	specified	in paragraph	(a)(2)	of	this	section	shall	be	retained	and	transferred	with	the	aircraft	at the	time	the	aircraft	is	sold.	(3)	A	list	of	defects	furnished	to	a	registered	owner	or operator	under	§	43.11	of	this	chapter	shall	be retained	until	the	defects	are repaired	and	the	aircraft	is	approved	for	return	to	service.

C.	The	Extent	Of	Relief Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	And	The	Reason Spitz Industrial	Design Seeks	The	Relief.

1. Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section Part	21,	Subpart	H

Given	the	size	and	limited	operating	area	associated	with	the	UAS	to	be	utilized	by

the Spitz	Industrial	Design ,	an	exemption	from	Part	21	Subpart	H	meets	the requirements	of	an	equivalen t	level	of	safety	under	Part	11	and	Section	333	of	the

Reform	Act.

The	Federal	Aviation	Act	(49	U.S.C.§	44701(f))	and	Section	333	of	the	Reform	Act both	authorize	the	FAA	to	exempt	aircraft	from	the	requirement	for	an airworthiness	certificate,	upon	consideration	of	the	size,	weight,	speed,	operational capability,	and	pro ximity	to	airports	and	populated	areas	of	the	particular	UAS.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 11 In	all	cases,	an	analysis	of	these	criteria	demonstrates	that	the	UAS	operated	without an	airworthiness	certificate,	in	the	restricted	environment	and	under	the	conditions proposed	will	be	at least	as	safe,	or	safer,	than	a	conventional	rotorcraft	operating

with	an	airworthiness	certificate	without	the	restrictions	and	conditions	of	the proposed	UAS	operations.

2.	Extent	Of	Relief Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	And	The	Reason Spitz

Industrial	D esign Seeks	Relief	From	Section	61.113	(a)	and	(b).

Relief	from	Section	61.113	(a)	and	(b)	entitled Private	pilot	privileges	and

limitations:	Pilot	in	command ,	is	requested	to	the	extent	necessary	to	allow	a	PIC

, holding	a	valid	airman	medical certificate,	and qualified	as	an	AMA	R/C	flight
instructor, and	who	has	met	certain	flight

- hour	and	currency	requirements,	to conduct	the	proposed	UAS	flight	operations	for	compensation	or	hire.

This	relief	is	requested	since	the	limitations	set	forth	in Section	61.113(a)	and	(b) state	that	a	private	pilot	may,	for	compensation	or	hire,	act	as	PIC	of	an	aircraft	in connection	with	any	business	or	employment	if:	(1)	The	flight	is	only	incidental	to that	business	or	employment;	and	(2)	The	aircraft	does	not carry	passengers	or property	for	compensation	or	hire.

As	set	forth	more	fully	below, Spitz	Industrial	Desi gn submits	that	an	equivalent level	of	safety	will	be	maintained	because	no	PIC	will	be	allowed	to	operate	the	DJI Inspire	1	UAS	unless	that	PIC	has met	certain	flight

- hour	and	currency requirements,	demonstrating	that	the	PIC	is	able	to	safely	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1 UAS	in	a	manner	consistent	with	the	operations	specifications	as	described	in	this exemption,	including	evasive	and	emergency	maneuve rs,	as	well	as	maintaining appropriate	distances	from	people,	vessels,	vehicles	and	structures.

Further, Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that	all	flights	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS, conducted	by	the	PIC	pursuant	to	the	grant	of	this	Petition:	(1)	will	be	in cidental	to Spitz	Industrial	Design business;	and	(2)	will	not	carry	passengers	or	property	for compensation	or	hire.

3.	Extent	Of	Relief Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	And	The	Reason Spitz Industrial	Design Seeks	Relief	From	Section	91.7(a).

Relief	from	Section	91.7(a)	entitled Civil	aircraft	airworthiness ,	is	requested	to	the extent	required	to	allow Spitz	Industrial	Design to	determine	that	the	DJI	Inspire	1 UAS	are	in	airworthy	condition	prior	to	every	flight	by	ensuring	that	the	UAS	is	in compliance	with	the	operating	documents	(i.e.,	the	Monthly	Maintenance	Log,	and DJI	Inspire	1	Instruction	Manual ,	and	company	maintenance	procedures ).

Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	the	requested	relief	because	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	does not	require	an	airw orthiness	certificate	in	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	Part	21, Subpart	H.	Therefore, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	ensure	that	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS is	in	airworthy	condition	based	upon	its	compliance	with	the	operating	documentsSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 12 (i.e.,	Monthly	Maintenance	Log ,	and	DJI	Inspire	1	Instruction	Manual ,	and	company maintenance	procedures )	prior	to	every	flight,	and	further,	determine	that	the aircraft	are	in	condition	for	safe	flight,	as	stated	in	the	conditions	and	limitations

below.

4.	Extent	Of	Relief Spitz	Indu strial	Design Seeks	And	The	Reason Spitz Industrial	Design Seeks	Relief	From	Section	91.121.

Relief	from	Section	91.121,	entitled	Altimeter	settings,	may	be	required	to	allow flight	operations	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS,	which	utilize	a	barometric	pressure sensor,	GPS	equipment,	and	a	radio	communications	telemetry	data	link	to downlink	altitude	information	from	the	UA	to	the	PIC	at	the	ground	control	station (GCS).	Since	the	FAA	requires	that	any	altitude	information	concerning	UAS operations	be	reported	to air	traffic	control	(ATC)	in	feet	above	ground	level	(AGL), Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	the	requested	relief	because	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UA’s altimeter	may	be	set	on	the	ground	to	zero	feet	AGL,	rather	than	the	local barometric	pressure	or	field	altitude,	before	each	flight.

Considering	the	limited	altitude	of	the	proposed	operations,	re lief	from	14	CFR 91.121	is	sought	to	the	extent	necessary	to	comply	with	the	applicable	conditions and	limitations	stated	below.	As	more	fully	set	forth	herein,	an	equivalent	level	of safety	will	be	maintained	since	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	is	equipped	with	a barometric pressure	sensor	and	GPS	equipment,	which	automatically	ensures	that	a	ground level	pressure	setting	will	be	established	prior	to	each	flight,	and	provides	the	PIC

with	altitude	information	of	the	UA	on	the	heads

- up	display	of	the	GCS.

5.	Extent Of	Relief Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	And	The	Reason Spitz Industrial	Design Seeks	Relief	From	Section	91.151(b).

Relief	from	Section	91.151(b)	entitled	Fuel	requirements	for	flight	in	VFR conditions,	is	requested	to	the	extent	required	to	allow	flight s	of	the	battery powered	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	during	daylight	hours	in	visual	meteorological	conditions (VMC),	under	visual	flight	rules	(VFR),	for	a	total	duration	of	13.5	minutes	to	the first	point	of	intended	landing	and, assuming	normal	cruising	speed,	to fly	after	that

for	at	least	4.5	minutes. Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	the	requested	relief	because without	an	exemption	from	Section	91.151(b),	the	flight	time	duration	of	the	battery powered	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	will	severely	constrain	the	practicality	of	an y	aerial	video or	still	photo	flight	operations	that Spitz	Industrial	Design proposes	to	conduct pursuant	to	this	Petition.	Significantly,	as	set	forth	below,	the	technical specifications	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	operating	documents,	and Spitz	Industrial	Design ’s proposed	operating	limitations,	ensure	that Spitz Industrial	Design will	safely	operate	the	battery	powered	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	during daylight	hours	in	visual	meteorological	conditions	(VMC),	under	visual	flight	rules (VFR),	with enough	battery	power	to	fly	for	a	total	duration	of	13.5	minutes	to	the first	point	of	intended	landing	and,	assuming	normal	cruising	speed,	to	fly	after	that

for	at	least	4.5	minutes.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 13 6.	Extent	Of	Relief Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	And	The	Reason Spitz Industrial	Design Seeks	Relief	From	Sections	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	And	91.417(a)	&	(b).

Since	Sections	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b) only	apply	to	aircraft	with	an	airworthiness	certificate, Spitz	Industrial	Design requests	relief	from	these	Sections	because	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	does	not	require an	airworthiness	certificate.	As	set	forth	more	fully	below,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS meets	the	conditions	of	FMRA	Section	333	for	operation	without	an airworthiness certificate.	Accordingly, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	use	trained	technicians	to perform	maintenance,	alterations,	or	preventive	maintenance	on	the	UAS	using	the methods,	techniques,	and	practices	prescribed	in	the	UAS	operating	documents (i.e

., Monthly	Maintenance	Log, DJI	Inspire	1	Instruction	Manual ,	and	company maintenance	procedures ).	Furthermore, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	document	and maintain	all	maintenance	records	for	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS.

D.	The	Reasons	Why	Granting Spitz	Ind ustrial	Design ’s Request	Would	Be	In The	Public	Interest;	or	How	It	Would	Benefit	The	Public	As	A	Whole.

Granting	the	present	petition	will	further	the	public	interest	by	allowing Spitz Industrial	Design to	safely,	efficiently,	and	economically	perform	a erial	video surveys	of	infrastructure	&	land	development	projects over	certain	areas	of	the United	States.	Furthermore,	it	will	benefit	the	public	as	a	whole	by enabling	more cost	effective	ecological	planning &	monitoring of	such	projects .	Additionally,	u se	of the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	will	decrease	congestion	of	the	NAS,	and	reduce	pollution

. Notably,	the	benefits	of Spitz	Industrial	Design proposed	operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire 1	UAS	will	be	realized	without	implicating	any	privacy	issues.

1.	The	Public	Will Benefit	From	Decreased	Congestion	Of	The	NAS.

The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAs	are	battery	powered	and	serve	as	a	safe,	efficient,	and economical	alternative	to	the	manned	aircraft	traditionally	utilized	to	obtain	aerial imagery.	By	reducing	the	amount	of	manned	ai rcraft	needed	to	perform	aerial acquisitions,	an	exemption	allowing	the	use	of	a	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	would	reduce	the amount	of	manned	aircraft	in	the	NAS,	reduce	noise	and	air	pollution,	as	well	as increase	the	safety	of	life	and	property	in	the	air	and	on the	ground.

Furthermore,	by	reducing	the	number	of	manned	aircraft	operating	in	the	NAS, congestion	around	airports	caused	by	arriving	and	departing	aircraft	will	be reduced.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAs	do	not	require	an	airport	to	takeoff	or	land.	Likewise,

a reduction	of	manned	aircraft	conducting	aerial	video	and	photography	missions would	result	in	fewer	aircraft	that	must	be	handled	by	air	traffic	control	during	the ground,	takeoff,	departure,	arrival,	and	landing	phases	of	flight	operations.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 14 2.	The	Public	Will	Benefit	From	The	Safety	And	Efficiency	Of	The	DJI	Inspire	1

UAS.

Conducting	aerial	acquisitions	with	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS,	instead	of	manned aircraft,	will	greatly	benefit	the	public	by	drastically	reducing	the	levels	of	air	and noise	pollution	generated	during	traditional	aerial	video	and	still	photography	flight

oper ations.	By	using	battery	power	and	electric	motors,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS produces	no	air	pollution,	and	is	the	most	viable	environmentally	conscious alternative	to	the	cabin	class,	six	cylinder	internal	combustion	engine	aircraft	that are	typically	utiliz ed	for	aerial	video	and	photography,	while	burning significant quantities	of aviation	fuel.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UA,	while	reducing	the	carbon	footprint of	aerial	acquisitions,	also	eliminates	noise	pollution,	as	the	UAs	are	propelled	by battery	powered	elect ric	motors,	rather	than	an	internal	combustion	engine.

By	using	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	to	perform	aerial	acquisitions,	the	substantial	risk	to life	and	property	in	the	air	and	on	the	ground,	which	is	usually	associated	with traditional	manned	aircraft	flig ht	operations,	will	be	substantially	reduced	or completely	eliminated.

Aside	from	the	lack	of	flight	crew	members	located	onboard	the	aircraft,	the	DJI Inspire	1	UA	(weighing	approximately	6	pounds	7.5	ounces	respectively,	at	its maximum	gross	weight	with a	length	of	17.3	inches	and	width	of	17.7	inches,	and with	no	fuel	on	board),	has	less	physical	potential	for	collateral	damage	to	life	and property	on	the	ground,	and	in	the	air,	compared	to	the	manned	aircraft	that typically	conduct	similar	operations

.

3.	Performing	Aerial	Video	and	Photography	Operations	With	The	DJI	Inspire 1	UAS	Will	Benefit	The	Economy.

In	addition	to	being	safe	and	efficient,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	is	also	an	economical alternative	to	using	manned	aircraft	to	conduct	similar	aerial operations.	As	such, operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	will	allow	United	States	based	companies,	like Spitz	Industrial	Design ,	to	remain	competitive	and	contribute	to	growth	of	the	U.S. economy.	Specifically,	with	the	rising	cost	of	aviation	fuel	and	the Environmental Protection	Agency	(“EPA”)	regulatory	actions	phasing	out	leaded	aviation	fuels,	U.S. owned	and	operated	companies	must	adopt	new	and	alternative	technology	in order	to	remain	competitive.

Operating	the	battery	powered	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	is	o ne	such	technology	that	not only	allows	companies	greater	operational	flexibility	compared	to	manned	aircraft, but	provides	such	flexibility	without	the	high	operational	cost	of	a	traditional

manned	aircraft.

By	operating	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS,	companies such Spitz	Industrial	Design ,	can remain	competitive	and	profitable,	and	therefore,	provide	greater	job	stability	to employees	and	contractors,	which	will	ultimately	contribute	to	growth	of	the	U.S.

economy.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 15 4.	There	Are	No	Privacy	Issues.

Similar	to	th e	manned	aerial	acquisition	flight	operations	that	have	been	conducted for	decades, Spitz	Industrial	Design’s proposed	operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS will	not	implicate	any	privacy	issues.	Specifically,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	will	be operated	only	in	co mpliance	with	operating	documents	(i.e.,	Monthly	Maintenance Log,	and	DJI	Inspire	1	Instruction	Manual ,	company	maintenance	procedures ), which	requires	property	owner	involvement	as	well	as	local	law	enforcement notification,	and	in	accordance	with	the	Fed eral	Aviation	Regulations,	including	the minimum	altitude	requirements	of	14	C.F.R.	§	91.119.

E.	The	Reasons	Why	Granting	The	Exemption	Would	Not	Adversely	Affect Safety,	Or	How	The	Exemption	Would	Provide	A	Level	Of	Safety	At	Least	Equal

To	That	Provided By	The	Rule	From	Which Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks Exemption.

1.	Reasons	Why	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	Meets	The	Conditions	Of	The	FAA Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012	(FMRA)	Section	333. In	consideration	of the	size,	weight,	speed,	and	limited	operating	area	associated	with	the	unmanned aircraft	and	its	operation, Spitz	Industrial	Design’s operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1 UAS	meets	the	conditions	of	FMRA	Section	333,	and	will	not	require	an airworthiness	certificate	in	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	Part	21,	Subpart	H.

Section	333	provides	authority	for	a	UAS	to	operate	without	airworthiness certification	and	sets	forth	requirements	for	considering	whether	a	UAS	will	create	a

hazard	to	users	of	t he	NAS	or	the	public,	or	otherwise	pose	a	threat	to	national security.	Specifically,	FMRA	Section	333	states	the	following,	in	part:

(a)	In	General.--Notwithstanding	any	other	requirement	of	this	subtitle,	and	not	later than	180	days	after	the	date	of	ena ctment	of	this	Act,	the	Secretary	of	Transportation shall	determine	if	certain	unmanned	aircraft	systems	may	operate	safely	in	the national	airspace	system	before	completion	of	the plan	and	rulemaking	required	by section	332	of	this	Act	or	the	guidance	req uired	by	section	334	of	this	Act.__	(b) Assessment	of	Unmanned	Aircraft	Systems.--In	making	the	determination	under subsection	(a),	the	Secretary	shall	determine,	at	a	minimum--

(1)	which	types	of	unmanned	aircraft	systems,	if	any,	as	a	result	of	their	si ze,	weight, speed,	operational	capability,	proximity	to	airports	and	populated	areas,	and operation	within	visual	line	of	sight	do	not	create	a	hazard	to	users	of	the	national airspace	system	or	the	public	or	pose	a	threat	to	national	security;	and__	(2)	w hether	a certificate	of	waiver,	certificate	of	authorization,	or	airworthiness	certification	under section	44704	of	title	49,	United	States	Code,	is	required	for	the	operation	of unmanned	aircraft	systems	identified	under	paragraph	(1).	(c)	Requirements	fo r	Safe Operation.--If	the	Secretary	determines	under	this	section	that	certain	unmanned aircraft	systems	may	operate	safely	in	the	national	airspace	system,	the	Secretary	shall establish	requirements	for	the	safe	operation	of	such	aircraft	systems	in	the	n ationalSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 16 airspace	system.

In	seeking	this	exemption, Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS can	operate	safely	in	the	NAS	pursuant	to	FMRA	Section	333,	as	demonstrated	by: (a)	the	characteristics	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS;	(b)	the	pilot certification requirement;	and	(c)	the	specific	operating	limitations.

a.	The	Specifications	Of	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	Demonstrates	Its	Safe

Characteristics.

The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	does	not	create	a	hazard	to	users	of	the	NAS	or	the	public,	or otherwise	po se	a	threat	to	national	security	considering	its	size,	weight,	speed,	and operational	capability.

i.	Technical	Specifications	Of	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS.

The	technical	specifications	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	are	set	forth	by	the	DJI	Inspire	1 Specification s	and	Data	Sheet.

ii.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	Autonomous	Flight	And	Navigation	Modes	Enable	The UAS	To	Remain	Within	A	Defined	Operational	Area. The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	may be	operated	in	both	manual	and	fully	autonomous	flight	modes.	A	complete description	o f	the	flight	and	navigational	modes	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	is	provided at	pages	12

- 16	and	45

- 50	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1 User	Manual,	attached	hereto	in Appendix B.

iii.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	Is	Designed	For	Automatic	Return	To	Home	Point	Or

Hover	In	The	Ev ent	Of	Loss	Of	The	Control	Link	Or	Navigation.

When	the	Control	Link	is	lost,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	will	remain	stationary,	in	flight, for	3	seconds	or	more.	If,	after	3	seconds,	DJI	Inspire	1	UA	do	not	reacquire	control link	data	from	the	GCS,	the	UA	will assume	that	the	Control	Link	is	lost	and	the	UA will	return	to	the	home	position	(i.e.,	failsafe	mode)	via	GPS,	and	will	descend	to	the takeoff	position	and	shutdown.

A	complete	description	of	the	Failsafe	Functions	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	are	set

forth at	pages	13	through	15	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	User	Manual,	attached	hereto	as

Exhibit	A.

iv.	The	DJI	Inspire	1	GCS	And	Its	Operation.

A	complete	description	of	the	operation	and	specifications	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	GCS and	flight	control	software	is	provid ed	at	pages	40	through	47	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1 User	Manual.	DJI	Inspire	1	User	Manual	is	attached	hereto	as	Exhibit	A.

b.	Flight	Operations	Of	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	is	Limited	To	The	Line	Of	Sight	Of	A Certificated	Pilot	in	Command	With	A	Safety	Observer.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 17 Spitz	Industrial	Design will	only	utilize	certificated	pilots	to	act	as	a	pilot	in command	(PIC)	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS.	Additionally,	a	safety	observer	will	assist	all pilots	during	flight	time.

c.	Flights	Of	The	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	Will	Be	Conducted	Pur suant	To	Specific Operating	Limitations.

In	seeking	this	exemption, Spitz	Industrial	Design proposes	to	commercially	operate the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	for	the	special	purpose	of	conducting	aerial	video	and photography	over	certain	areas	of	United	States,	pursuant	to	the	following	specific operating	limitations:

1.	Operations	authorized	by	this	grant of	exemption	will	be	limited	to	the	following aircraft	described	in	the	operating	documents,	rotorcraft	UASs	weighing	less	than 55	pounds	maximum	gross	weight:	DJI	Inspire	1	Unmanned	Aircraft	Systems. Proposed	operations	of	any	other	aircraft	will	require a	new	petition	or	a	petition	to amend	this	grant.

2.	UAS	operations	under	this	exemption	will	be	limited	to	conducting	operations	for the	purpose	of	aerial	video	and	photography.

3.	The	UAs	may	not	be	flown	at	an	indicated	airspeed	exceeding	20	knots.

4.	The	UA	must	be	operated	at	an	altitude	of	no	more	than	500	feet	above	ground level	(AGL),	as	indicated	by	the	procedures	specified	in	the	operating	documents unless	a	special	request	is	made	and	approved	by	ATC.	All	altitudes	reported	to	ATC

must	be	in feet	AGL.

5.	The	UAs	must	be	operated	within	visual	line	of	sight	(VLOS)	of	the	PIC	at	all	times. This	requires	the	PIC	to	be	able	to	use	human	vision	unaided	by	any	device	other

than	corrective lenses

, as	specified	on	the	PIC’s	FAA

- issued	airman	medical

certificate.

6.	The	use	of	first	person	view	(FPV)	by	the	PIC	or	safety	observer	(SO)	is	not permitted.

7.	All	operations	must	utilize	a	safety	observer	(SO).	The	SO	may	be	used	to	satisfy the	VLOS	requirement	as	long	as	the	PIC	always	maintains	VLOS	cap ability.	The	SO and	PIC	must	be	able	to	communicate	verbally	at	all	times.	Electronic	messaging	or texting	is	not	permitted	during	flight	operations.	The	PIC	must	be	designated	before the	flight	and	cannot	transfer	his	or	her	designation	for	the	duration	o f	the	flight. The	PIC	must	ensure	that	the	SO	can	perform	the	functions	prescribed	in	the operating	documents.

8.	The	SO	must	not	perform	any	other	duties	beyond	assisting	the	PIC	with	seeing and	avoiding	other	air	traffic	and	other	ground	based	obstacles /obstructions	and	is not	permitted	to	operate	the	camera	or	other	instruments.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 18 9.	The	operating	documents	and	the	grant	of	exemption	must	be	accessible	during UAS	operations	and	made	available	to	the	Administrator	upon	request.	If	a discrepancy	exists	bet ween	the	conditions	and	limitations	contained	in	the	grant	of exemption	and	the	procedures	outlined	in	the	operating	documents,	the	conditions and	limitations	contained	in	the	grant	of	exemption	take	precedence	and	must	be followed.	Otherwise,	the	operator must	follow	the	procedures	as	outlined	in	its operating	documents.	The	operator	may	update	or	revise	its	operating	documents. It	is	the	operator’s	responsibility	to	track	such	revisions	and	present	updated	and revised	documents	to	the	Administrator	upon	r equest.	The	operator	must	also present	updated	and	revised	documents	if	it	petitions	for	extension	or	amendment to	the	grant	of	exemption.	If	the	operator	determines	that	any	update	or	revision would	affect	the	basis	upon	which	the	FAA	granted	the	exemptio n,	then	the	operator must	petition	for	amendment	to	its	grant	of	exemption.	The	FAA’s	UAS	Integration Office	(AFS

- 80)	may	be	contacted	if	questions	arise	regarding	updates	or	revisions to	the	operating	documents.

10.	Prior	to	each	flight	the	PIC	must	insp ect	the	UAS	to	ensure	that	it	is	in	a condition	for	safe	flight.	If	the	inspection	reveals	a	condition	that	affects	the	safe operation	of	the	UAS,	the	aircraft	is	prohibited	from	operating	until	the	necessary maintenance	has	been	performed	and	the	UAS	is	f ound	to	be	in	a	condition	for	safe flight.	The	Ground	Control	Station	must	be	included	in	the	preflight	inspection.	All maintenance	and	alterations	must	be	properly	documented	in	the	aircraft	records.

11.	Any	UAS	that	has	undergone	maintenance	or	alterati ons	that	affect	the	UAS operation	or	flight	characteristics,	e.g.	replacement	of	a	flight	critical	component, must	undergo	a	functional	test	flight.	The	PIC	who	conducts	the	functional	test	flight must	make	an	entry	in	the	aircraft	records.

12.	The	pre

- fl ight	inspection	must	account	for	all	potential	discrepancies,	e.g. inoperable	components,	items,	or	equipment,	not	already	covered	in	the	relevant sections	of	the	operating	documents.

13.	The	operator	must	follow	the	UAS	manufacturer’s	aircraft/component, maintenance,	overhaul,	replacement,	inspection,	and	life	limit	requirements.

14.	The	operator	must	carry	out	its	maintenance,	inspections,	and	record	keeping requirements,	in	accordance	with	the	operating	documents.	Maintenance, inspection,	alterations, and	status	of	replacement/overhaul	component	parts	must be	noted	in	the	aircraft	records,	including	total	time	in	service,	description	of	work accomplished,	and	the	signature	of	the	authorized	person	returning	the	UAS	to

service.

15.	Each	UAS	operated	und er	this	exemption	must	comply	with	all	manufacturer Safety	Bulletins.

16.	The	authorized	person	must	make	an	entry	in	the	aircraft	record	of	the corrective	action	taken	against	discrepancies	discovered	between inspections.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 19 17.	The	PIC	must	meet	possess at	least	a	current	medical	certificate

.

18.	The	operator	may	not	permit	any	PIC	to	operate	unless	the	PIC	meets	the operator’s	qualification	criteria	and	demonstrates	the	ability	to	safely	operate	the UAS	in	a	manner	consistent	with	how	the	UAS	will	be	op erated	under	the exemption,	including	evasive	and	emergency	maneuvers	and	maintaining appropriate	distances	from	persons,	vessels,	vehicles	and	structures.	PIC qualification	flight	hours	must	be	logged	in	a	manner	consistent	with	14	C.F.R.	§ 61.51(b).	Flig hts	for	the	purposes	of	training	the	operator’s	PICs	are	permitted under	the	terms	of	the	exemption.	However,	training	operations	may	only	be conducted	during	dedicated	training	sessions.	During	training,	proficiency,	and experience

- building	flights,	all	p ersons	not	essential	for	flight	operations	are

considered	non

- participants,	and	the	PIC	must	operate	the	UA	with	appropriate distance	from	nonparticipants	in	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	§	91.119.

19.	UAS	operations	may	not	be	conducted	during	night,	as	defi ned	in	14	C.F.R.	§	1.1. All	operations	must	be	conducted	under	visual	meteorological	conditions	(VMC).	If flight	at	night	is	required,	a	special	request	will	be	made	at	the	FAA	office	closest	to proposed	area	of	operations.	Flights	under	special	visual	fli ght	rules	(SVFR)	are	not

authorized.

20.	The	UA	may	not	operate	within	5	nautical	miles	of	an	airport	reference	point	as

denoted	on	a	current	FAA

- published	aeronautical	chart	unless	a	letter	of	agreement with	that	airport’s	management	is	obtained,	and	the operation	is	conducted	in accordance	with	a	NOTAM	as	required	by	the	operator’s	COA.	The	letter	of agreement	with	the	airport	management	must	be	made	available	to	the Administrator	upon	request.

21.	The	UA	may	not	be	operated	less	than	500	feet	below	or less	than	2,000	feet horizontally	from	a	cloud	or	when	visibility	is	less	than	3	statute	miles	from	the	PIC.

22.	If	the	UA	loses	communications	or	loses	its	GPS	signal,	it	must	return	to	a	pre

determined	location	within	the	planned	operating	area	and	land or	be	recovered	in accordance	with	the	operating	documents.

23.	The	PIC	must	abort	the	flight	in	the	event	of	unpredicted	obstacles	or emergencies	in	accordance	with	the	operating	documents.

24.	The	PIC	is	prohibited	from	beginning	a	flight	unless	(cons idering	wind	and forecast	weather	conditions)	there	is	enough	power	to	fly	at	normal	cruising	speed to	the	intended	landing	point	and	land	the	UA	with	25%	battery	power	remaining.

25.	The	operator	must	obtain	an	Air	Traffic	Organization	(ATO)	issued	Certi ficate	of Waiver	or	Authorization	(COA)	prior	to	conducting	any	operations	under	the	grant of	exemption.	This	COA	will	also	require	the	operator	to	request	a	Notice	to	Airman (NOTAM)	not	more	than	72	hours	in	advance,	but	not	less	than	48	hours	prior	to	th e operation.	All	operations	shall	be	conducted	in	accordance	with	airspaceSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 20 requirements	in	the	ATO	issued	COA	including	class	of	airspace,	altitude	level	and potential	transponder	requirements.

26.	All	aircraft	operated	in	accordance	with	the	exemption	must	be	identified	by serial	number,	registered	in	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	part	47,	and	have identification	(N

- Number)	markings	in	accordance	with	14	C.F.R.	part	45,	Subpart	C. Markings	must	be as	large	as	practicable.

27.	Before	conducting	operations,	the	radio	frequency	spectrum	used	for	operation and	control	of	the	UA	must	comply	with	the	Federal	Communications	Commission (FCC)	or	other	appropriate	government	oversight	agency	requirements.

2 8.	The	documents	required	fewer	than	14	C.F.R.	91.9	and	91.203	must	be	available to	the	PIC	at	the	Ground	Control	Station	of	the	UAS	any	time	the	UAS	is	operating. These	documents	must	be	made	available	to	the	Administrator	or	any	law

enforcement	official upon	request.

29.	The	UA	must	remain	clear	and	yield	the	right	of	way	to	all	manned	aviation operations	and	activities	at	all	times.

30.	The	UAS	may	not	be	operated	by	the	PIC	from	any	moving	device	or	vehicle.

31.	Flight	operations	must	be	conducted	at least	500	feet	from	all	nonparticipating persons	(persons	other	than	the	PIC,	SO,	operator	trainees	or	essential	persons), vessels,	vehicles,	and	structures	unless:

a.	Barriers	or	structures	are	present	that	sufficiently	protect	nonparticipating

persons from	the	UA	and/or	debris	in	the	event	of	an	accident.	The	operator	must ensure	that	nonparticipating	persons	remain	under	such	protection.	If	a	situation arises	where	nonparticipating	persons	leave	such	protection	and	are	within	500	feet of	the	UA,	flight operations	must	cease	immediately	and/or;

b.	The	aircraft	is	operated	near	vessels,	vehicles	or	structures	where	the owner/controller	of	such	vessels,	vehicles	or	structures	has	granted	permission	and the	PIC	has	made	a	safety	assessment	of	the	risk	of	o perating	closer	to	those	objects and	determined	that	it	does	not	present	an	undue	hazard,	and;

c.	Operations	nearer	to	the	PIC,	SO,	operator	trainees	or	essential	persons	do	not present	an	undue	hazard	to	those	persons	per	§	91.119(a).

32.	All	operations shall	be	conducted	over	private	or	controlled

- access	property with	permission	from	the	land	owner/controller	or	authorized	representative. Permission	from	land	owner/controller	or	authorized	representative	will	be obtained	for	each	flight	to	be	conducted.

33.	Any	incident,	accident,	or	flight	operation	that	transgresses	the	lateral	or	vertical boundaries	of	the	operational	area	as	defined	by	the	applicable	COA	must	beSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 21 reported	to	the	FAA's	UAS	Integration	Office	(AFS

- 80)	within	24	hours.	Accidents

must	be reported	to	the	National	Transportation	Safety	Board	(NTSB)	per

instructions	contained	on	the	NTSB	Web	site: www.ntsb.gov

.

2.	Reasons	Why	An	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section	21	Subpart H	Would	Not	Adversely	Affect	Safety.__

Spitz	Industrial	De sign submits	that	the	equivalent	level	of	safety	established	by Section	61.113(a)	and	(b)	will	be	maintained	because The	UAS	to	be	operated hereunder	weighs	less	than	55	lbs.	fully	loaded,	carries	neither	a	pilot	nor passenger,	carries	no	explosive	materials	or	flammable	liquid	fuels,	and	operates exclusively	within	a	secured	area.	Unlike	other	civil	aircraft,	the	propos ed operations	in	this	petition	for	exemption	will	be	controlled	and	monitored	by	the operator,	pursuant	to	the	Manual's	requirements.

These	safety	enhancements,	which	already	apply	to	civil	aircraft	operated	in connection	with	existing	inspection	operatio ns,	provide	a	greater	degree	of	safety	to the	public	and	property	owners	than	conventional	operations	conducted	with airworthiness	certificates	issued	under	14	C.F.R.	Part	21,	Subpart	H.	Lastly, application	of	these	same	criteria	demonstrates	that	there	is no	credible	threat	to national	security	posed	by	the	UAS,	due	to	its	size,	speed	of	operation,	location	of operation,	lack	of	explosive	materials	or	flammable	liquid	fuels,	and	inability	to carry	a	substantial	external	load.

3.	Reasons	Why	An	Exemption	F rom	The	Requirements	Of	Section	61.113(a) And	(b)	Would	Not	Adversely	Affect	Safety.__

Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that	the	equivalent	level	of	safety	established	by Section	61.113(a)	and	(b)	will	be	maintained	because	no	PIC	will	be	allowed	to

operat e	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	unless	that	PIC	has	demonstrated,	by	meeting minimum	flight

- hour	and	currency	requirements,	that	the	PIC	is	able	to	safely operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	in	a	manner	consistent	with	the	exemption,	including evasive	and	emergency	mane uvers	and	maintaining	appropriate	distances	from people,	vessels,	vehicles	and	structures.

Considering Spitz	Industrial	Design’s proposed	area	of	operations,	and	the	operating

limitations	set	forth

- above;	the	parallel	nature	of	private	pilot	aeronautical knowledge	requirements	to	those	of	commercial	pilot	requirements	(See	Exemption No.	11062);	and	the	airmanship	skills	necessary	to	safely	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1
UAS, Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that	the	additional	manned	airmanship experience	of	a	c ommercially	certificated	pilot	would	not	correlate	to	the airmanship	skills	necessary	for Spitz	Industrial	Design’s specific	proposed	flight operations.

The	FAA	has	previously	granted	relief	from	Section	61.113(a)	and	(b)	specific	to
UAS,	in	circumstances similar,	in	all	material	respects,	to	those	presented	herein (e.g.	Exemption	Nos.	11062,	11063,	11064,	11065,	11066,	11067,	11080,	11109,Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 22 11110,	11112,	11136,	11138,	11150,	11153,	11156,	11158,	11159,	11160,	11161).

Spitz	Industrial	Design will	not	allow any	PIC	to	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	unless that	PIC	has	demonstrated,	by	meeting	minimum	flight

- hour	requirements	or	the DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	training	and	currency	requirements,	that	the	PIC	is	able	to	safely operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	in	a	manner	co nsistent	with	this	exemption,	including evasive	and	emergency	maneuvers	and	maintaining	appropriate	distances	from people,	vessels,	vehicles	and	structures.

Specifically,	the	PIC	must	have	accumulated	and	logged,	in	a	manner	consistent	with 14	C.F.R.	§	61 .51(b),	25	hours	of	total	time	as	a	UAS	rotorcraft	pilot	(with	a minimum	of	5	hours	of	those	hours	as	a	UAS	pilot	operating	the	same	make	and model	of	UAS	to	be	used	for	operations	under	the	exemption).	In	addition	to	the hour	requirements,	the	PIC	must	ac complish	3	takeoffs	and	landings	in	the preceding	90	days	(for	currency	purposes).

As	in	Exemption	Nos.	11062,	11138,	and	11153,	prior	documented	flight	experience that	was	obtained	in	compliance	with	applicable	regulations	will	ensure	an equivalent	level of	safety	during Spitz	Industrial	Design’s proposed	operations.	The Administrator	has	held	that	prior	documented	flight	experience	that	was	obtained in	compliance	with	applicable	regulations	would	ensure	safe	operations,	stating	as

follows:

In	Exemption No.	11062,	the	FAA	required	that	prior	to	conducting	operations	for the	purpose	of	motion	picture	filming	(or	similar	operations),	the	PIC	must	have accumulated	and	logged,	in	a	manner	consistent	with	14	CFR	61.51(b),	25	hours	of

total	time	as	a	UAS	rotorc raft	pilot	including	at	least	10	hours	logged	as	a	UAS	pilot

with	a	multi

- rotor	UAS.	Prior	to	operations	under	Exemption	No.	11062,	the	PIC

must	also	have	accum u lated	and	logged	a	minimum	of	5 hours	as	a	UAS	pilot operating	the	same	make	and	model	of	UAS	t o	be	used	for	operations	under	the exemption.	For	clarification,	the	FAA	considers	these	minimum	hour	requirements to	be	inclusive	rather	than	additive;	i.e.	5	hours	make	and	model	time	may	be

included	in	the	10	hours	of	multi

- rotor	time	and	the	10	hours	m ay	be	included	in	the total	25	hours	of	UAS	rotorcraft	time.	In	addition	to	the	hour	requirements,	the	PIC must	accomplish	3	takeoffs	and	landings	in	the	preceding	90	days	(for	currency purposes).	The	FAA	finds	that	at	a	minimum,	the	flight

- hour	requiremen ts	in Exemption	No.	11062	are	appropriate	to	practice	and	build	proficiency	in	the	skills necessary	to	safely	conduct	the	petitioner’s	proposed	operations.	The	FAA	also	finds that	prior	documented	flight	experience	that	was	obtained	in	compliance	with appl icable	regulations	would	satisfy	this	requirement.	Training,	proficiency,	and experience

- building	flights	can	also	be	conducted	under	the	grant	of	exemption	to accomplish	the	required	flight	time.	During	training,	proficiency,	and	experience

building	fligh ts	the	PIC	is	required	to	operate	the	UA	with	appropriate	distances	in

accordance	with	14	C.F.R	91.119.

Exemption	No.	11138	at	page	15.	Accordingly, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	ensureSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 23 safe	operations	by	not	allowing	any	PIC	to	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	U AS	unless	that PIC	has	demonstrated,	by	meeting	minimum	flight

- hour	and	currency	requirements, that	the	PIC	is	able	to	safely	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	in	a	manner	consistent with	the	exemption,	including	evasive	and	emergency	maneuvers	and	maintaining appropriate	distances	from	people,	vessels,	vehicles	and	structures.

4.	Reasons	Why	An	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section	91.7(a) Would	Not	Adversely	Affect	Safety.

The	equivalent	level	of	safety	established	by	Section	91.7(a)	will	be	maintained because	prior	to	every	flight, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	ensure	that	the	DJI	Inspire 1	UAS	is	in	an	airworthy	condition	based	upon	the	UAS’s	compliance	with	its operating	documents	and	as	stated	in	the	conditions	and	limitations	herein.

Additionally,	the	FAA	has	previously	granted	relief	from	Section	91.7(a)	specific	to UAS,	in	circumstances	similar,	in	all	material	respects,	to	those	presented	herein (e.g.	Exemption	Nos.	11062,	11063,	11064,	11065,	11066,	11067,	11080,	11109,
11110,	1111 2,	11136,	11138,	11150,	11153,	11156,	11157,	11158,	11159,	11160, 11161).

5.	Reasons	Why	An	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section	91.121 Would	Not	Adversely	Affect	Safety.__

The	equivalent	level	of	safety	established	by	Section	91.121	will	be	mainta ined

because	the	altitude	inf ormation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	U A	will	be	provided	to	the	PIC via	GPS	equipment	and	a	radio	communications	telemetry	data	link,	which downlinks	from	the	UA	to	the	GCS	for	active	monitoring	of	the	flight	path	and

altitude.	This	a ltitude	information,	combined	with Spitz	Industrial	Design’s operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	U	A	within	visual	line	of	sight,	at	or	below	500	feet AGL,	will	ensure	a	level	of	safety	equivalent	to	Section	91.121.	The	altitude information	will	be	generated	by GPS	equipment	installed	onboard	the	aircraft. Prior	to	each	flight,	a	zero	altitude	initiation	point	is	automatically	established	by the	UAS	at	ground	level.

The	FAA	has	previously	granted	relief	from	Section	91.121	specific	to	UAS,	in circumstances	similar,	in	all	material	respects,	to	those	presented	herein	(e.g. Exemption	Nos.	11062,	11063,	11064,	11065,	11066,	11067,	11080,	11109,	11112, 11136,	11138,	11150 ,	11153,	11156,	11157,	11158,	11159,	11160,	11161).

6.	Reasons	Why	An	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of	Section	91.151(b) Would	Not	Adversely	Affect	Safety.__

A	grant	of	this	exemption	would	ensure	an	equivalent	level	of	safety	established	by

14	C.F.R. Section	91.151(b)	as	a	result	of	(1)	the	technical	specifications	of	the	DJI Inspire	1	UAS;	(2)	the	limitations	on	the	proposed	flight	operations;	and	(3)	the location	of	the	proposed	flight	operations.	Accordingly, Spitz	Industrial	Design will

ensure	that it	will	safely	operate	the	battery	powered	DJI	Inspire	1	U	A	duringSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 24 daylight	hours	in	VFR	conditions,	with	enough	battery	power	to	fly	for	a	total duration	of	13.5	minutes	to	the	first	point	of	intended	landing	and,	assuming	normal cruising	speed,	to	fly after	that	for	at	least	4.5	minutes.

Here,	as	in	Exemption	No.	11109,	the	technical	specifications	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1
UAS; the	limitations	on	the	proposed	flight	operations;	and	the	location	of	the proposed	operations,	will	ensure	an	equivalent	level	of safety	established	by	14 C.F.R.	Section	91.151(b).	Furthermore,	safety	will	be	ensured	as	the	DJI	Inspire	1 UAS	provides	audible	and	visual	warnings	to	the	PIC	at	the	GCS	when	the	UA experiences	low	battery	voltage,	the	first	warning	occurring	at	approxim ately	33% remaining	battery	power,	and	again	at	approximately	10%	remaining	battery power.	At	the	critically	low	battery	level,	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	will	descend	and	land automatically.

Significantly,	previous	exemptions	granted	by	the	FAA	concerning	Sec tion	91.151 establish	that	safety	is	not	adversely	affected	when	the	technical	characteristics	and operating	limitations	of	the	UAS	are	considered.	Relief	has	been	granted	for	manned aircraft	to	operate	at	less	than	the	minimums	prescribed	in	Section	91.15 1, including	Exemption	Nos.	2689,	5745,	and	10650.	Moreover,	the	FAA	has	previously granted	relief	from	Section	91.151	specific	to	UAS,	in	circumstances	similar,	in	all material	respects,	to	those	presented	herein	(e.g.	Exemption	Nos.	8811,	10808,
10673,	1 1042,	11062,	11063,	11064,	11065,	11066,	11067,	11080,	11109,	11110, 11136,	11138,	11150,	11153,	11156,	11157,	11158,	11159,	11160,	11161).

7.	Reasons	Why	An	Exemption	From	The	Requirements	Of Sections__91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	And 91.417(a)	&	(b) Would	Not	Adversely	Affect	Safety.

In	seeking	this	exemption, Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that	the	equivalent	level of	safety	with	regard	to	the	regulatory	maintenance	and	alteration	requirements established	by	Sections	91.405(a),	91.4 07(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and 91.417(a)	&	(b)	will	be	met	because Spitz	Industrial	Design will	use	trained technicians	to	perform	maintenance,	alterations,	or	preventive	maintenance	on	the UAS	using	the	methods,	techniques,	and	practices	prescribed in	the	operating documents	(i.e.	Operations	Manu al,	Monthly	Maintenance	Log, DJI	Inspire	1

Instruction	Manual ,	and	company	maintenance	procedures ).	Furthermore, Spitz Industrial	Design will	document	and	maintain	all	maintenance	records	for	the	DJI Inspire 1	UAS.

Since	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	will	be	inspected	as	prescribed	by	the	operating documents, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	maintain	the	equivalent	level	of	safety established	by	Sections	91.405(a),	91.409(a)(1),	and	91.409(a)(2).	A	copy	of	the	DJI Inspir e	1	User	Manual	is	attached	hereto	as	Exhibit	C	and	D;	a	copy	of	the	DJI	Inspire

1	UAS	Maintenance	LOG	is	attached	hereto	as	Exhibit	C.

Likewise,	the	exemption	sought	will	not	adversely	affect	safety	because SpitzSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 25 Industrial	Design e	will	use	trained	tech nicians	to	perform	maintenance,	alterations or	preventive	maintenance	on	the	UAS	using	the	methods,	techniques,	and	practices prescribed	by	the	operating	documents.

Furthermore,	the	exemption	sought	would	maintain	an	equivalent	level	of	safety established	by	Sections	91.407,	91.417(a)	and	91.417(b),	because	all	maintenance	of the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	will	be	performed	by	trained	technicians.	Maintenance	will	be

documente d	and	maintained	utilizing	the	monthly	maintenance	log.	Previous exemptions	granted	by	the	FAA	concerning	Sections	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b)	establish	that	safety	is	not	adversely

affected	when	the	technical	charac teristics	and	operating	limitations	of	the	UAS	are

considered.	In	consideration	of Spitz	Industrial	Design proposed	operating limitations,	the	operating	documents,	and	the	technical	aspect s	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1
UAS, Spitz	Industrial	Design submits	that	saf ety	will	not	be	adversely	affected	by granting	exemption	from	14	C.F.R.	Sections	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1)	and	(a)(2), 91.409(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	and	(b).	The	FAA	has	previously	granted	relief	specific to	UAS	in	circumstances	similar,	in	all	material	respec ts,	to	those	presented	herein (e.g.	Exemption	Nos.	11062,	11063,	11064,	11065,	11066,	11067,	11080,	11109, 11110,	11112,	11136,	11138,	11150,	11153,	11156,	11157,	11158,	11159,	11160, 11161).

8.	The	FAA	May	Prescribe	Any	Other	Conditions	For	Safe	Operatio n.

In	accordance	with	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012 (FMRA)	and	14	C.F.R.	§	21.16	entitled	Special	Conditions, Spitz	Industrial	Design requests	that	the	FAA	prescribe	special	conditions	for	the	intended	operation	of	the DJI	In spire	1	UAS,	which	contain	such	safety	standards	that	the	Administrator	finds necessary	to	establish	a	level	of	safety	equivalent	to	that	established	by	14	C.F.R. Part	21,	Subpart	H,	and	14	C.F.R	§§	61.113(a)	&	(b),	91.7	(a),	91.121,	91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b).	Such	special conditions	will	permit	safe	operation	of	the	UAs	for	the	limited	purpose	of conducting	aerial	video	and	photography	over	certain	areas	of	the	United	States	for compensation	or	hire.	FMR A	Section	333	sets	forth	the	requirements	for considering	whether	a	UAS	will	create	a	hazard	to	users	of	the	NAS	or	the	public,	or otherwise	pose	a	threat	to	national	security;	and	further,	provides	the	authority	for such	UAS	to	operate	without	airworthine ss	certification	in	accordance	with	any requirements	that	must	be	established	for	the	safe	operation	of	the	UAS	in	the	NAS.

Likewise,	the	Administrator	may	prescribe	special	conditions	pursuant	to	14	C.F.R.	§ 21.16,	for	operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS, since	the	airworthiness	regulations	of 14	C.F.R.	Part	21	do	not	contain	adequate	or	appropriate	safety	standards,	due	to	the novel	or	unusual	design	features	of	the	aircraft.	Section	21.16,	entitled	Special Conditions,	states	the	following:

If	the	FAA	fi nds	that	the	airworthiness	regulations	of	this	subchapter	do	not	contain adequate	or	appropriate	safety	standards	for	an	aircraft,	aircraft	engine,	orSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 26 propeller	because	of	a	novel	or	unusual	design	feature	of	the	aircraft,	aircraft	engine or	propeller,	he prescribes	special	conditions	and	amendments	thereto	for	the product.	The	special	conditions	are	issued	in	accordance	with	Part	11	of	this	chapter and	contain	such	safety	standards	for	the	aircraft,	aircraft	engine	or	propeller	as	the FAA	finds	necessary	t o	establish	a	level	of	safety	equivalent	to	that	established	in	the regulations.

See	14	C.F.R.	§	21.16.	Therefore,	in	accordance	with	FMRA	Section	333	and	14	C.F.R. §	21.16,	the	FAA	may	prescribe	special	conditions	for Spitz	Industrial	Design intended	ope ration	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS,	which	contain	such	safety	standards that	the	Administrator	finds	necessary	to	establish	a	level	of	safety	equivalent	to that	established	by	14	C.F.R.	Part	21,	Subpart	H,	and	14	C.F.R	Sections	61.113(a)	& (b),	91.7(a),	91.12 1,	91.151(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and 91.417(a)	&	(b).Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 27 F. A	Summary	That	Can	Be	Published	In	The	Federal	Register,	stating:	The

Rules	From	Which Spitz	Industrial	Design Seeks	Exemption:

__

Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	exemp tion	from	the	requirements	of	14	C.F.R	Sections	21 Subpart	H,	61.113(a)&(b),	91.7(a),	91.121,	91.151(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	(b).

A	Brief	Description	Of The	Nature	Of	The	Exemptions Spitz	Industrial	Design

Seeks:

This	exemption	will	permit Spitz	Industrial	Design to	commercially	operate	an Unmanned	Aircraft	System	(UAS)	for	the	purpose	of	conducting	aerial	video	and photography	over	certain	areas	of	the	United	States.

Any	Additional	Information,	Views,	Or Arguments	Available	To	Support Spitz Industrial	Design Request.

This	Petition	is	made	pursuant	to	the	FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012 (FMRA)	Section	333,	which	directs	the	Secretary	of	Transportation	to	determine	if certain	UAS	may	operate	safely in	the	NAS.	As	such, Spitz	Industrial	Design’s request for	exemption	may	be	granted	pursuant	to	the	authority	of	FMRA	Section	333	and 14	C.F.R.	Part	11,	as	set	forth	above.	FMRA	Section	333	sets	forth	the	requirements for	considering	whether	a	UAS	will	cr eate	a	hazard	to	users	of	the	NAS	or	the	public, or	otherwise	pose	a	threat	to	national	security;	and	further,	provides	the	authority for	such	UAS	to	operate	without	airworthiness	certification.	As	discussed	in	detail above, Spitz	Industrial	Design will	op erate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	safely	in	the	NAS, without	creating	a	hazard	to	users	of	the	NAS,	or	the	public,	or	otherwise	pose	a threat	to	national	security.Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 28 CONCLUSION

As	set	forth	herein, Spitz	Industrial	Design seeks	an	exemption	pursuant	to	14	C.F. R. §	11.61	and	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012	(FMRA), which	will	permit	safe	operation	of	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UAS	commercially,	without	an airworthiness	certificate,	for	the	limited	purpose	of	conducting	aerial	video	and photogra phy	over	certain	areas	of	the	United	States.	By	granting	this	Petition,	the FAA	Administrator	will	be	fulfilling	the	Congressional	mandate	of	the	FAA Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	2012,	while	also	advancing	the	interests	of	the public,	by	allowing Spitz Industrial	Design to	safely,	efficiently,	and	economically operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UASs	commercially	within	the	NAS.

I n	accordance	with	the	Federal	Aviation	Regulations	and	the	FAA	Modernization and	Reform	Act	of	2012,	Section	333, Spitz	Industrial Design respectfully	requests that	the	Administrator	grant	this	Petition	for	an	exemption	from	the	requirements of	14	C.F.R	Sections	21	Subpart	H,	61.113(a)	&	(b),	91.7(a),	91.121,	91.151(b), 91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(1)	&	(a)(2),	and	91.417(a)	&	( b),	and	permit Spitz	Industrial	Design to	operate	the	DJI	Inspire	1	UASs	commercially	for	the purpose	of	conducting	aerial	video	and	photography	over	certain	areas	of	the	United

States.

Dated: June	3 ,	2015

Respectfully, Robert	Spitz

Spitz	Industrial Design,	31	Edgewood	Run,	Amherst,	NH	03031Spitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 29 APPENDIX

– A DJI	Inspire	1	Specifications	Data	Sheet

DJI	INSPIRE	1	TECHNICAL	SPECIFICATIONS

Spitz	Industrial	Design only	utilizes	safe	and	reliable	UASs for	professional	use .	DJI is	an	industry	leader	in small	UAS	production.	DJI	UASs utilize leadership	control

software	ena bling	the	operator	to	configure parameters,	which will	not	allow	flight into	controlled	airspace.	Parameters	can	also	be	set	to	limit	flight	to	no	higher	than	a predetermined	and	set	altitude	as	well	as	limit	flight	to	a	predetermined	and	set distance.	In	addition,	DJI	software	provides	real

- time	altitud e	and	locatio n information	to	the	PIC	via	a linked	monitor	( HDMI	video	screen,	smart	phone,	or tablet	devices)

2.2 DJI	Inspire	1 Specifications

2.2.1 Aircraft

2.2.1.1	Model

– T600 2.2.1.2	Weight	(Battery	Included)

– 6lbs	7.5291oz	(2935g)

2.2.1.3	Hover ing	Accuracy	(GPS	Mode)

– Vertical:	0.5m;	Horizontal:	2.5m 2.2.1.4	Max	Angular	Velocity

– Pitch:	3000/s;	Yaw:	1500/s	2.2.1.5	Max	Tilt	Angle

- 350

2.2.1.6	Max	Ascent	Speed

– 5m/s 2.2.1.7	Max	Descent	Speed

– 4m/s 2.2.1.8	Max	Speed

– 22m/s	(ATTI	mode,	no wind

– NOT	RECOMMENDED) 2.2.1.9	Max	Flight	Altitude

– 4500m

2.2.1.10	Max	Wind	Resistance

– 10m/s 2.2.1.11	Max	Flight	Time

– Approximately	18	minutes

2.2.1.12	Motor	Model

– DJI	3510 2.2.1.13	Propeller	Model

– DJI	1345 2.2.1.14	Operating	Temperature	Range

– 140F	to	1040F	(

- 100C	to	400C)

2.2.1.15	Dimensions

– 17	1⁄4”	x	17	3⁄4”	x	12”

Camera Positioning System

2.2.2	Gimbal

2.2.2.1	Model

– ZENMUSE	X3 2.2.2.2	Output	Power	(with	camera)

– Static:	9W;	In	Motion:	11W 2.2.2.3	Operating	Current

– Static:	750mA;	In	Motion:	900mA 2.2.2.4	Angular	Vibration	Range

- ±0.030 2.2.2.5	Mounting

– Detachable 2.2.2.6	Controllable	Range

– Pitch:

- 900to	+300;	Pan:	±3200 2.2.2.7	Mechanical	Range

– Pitch:

- 1250to	450;	Pan:	±3300

2. 2.2.8	Max	Controllable	Speed

– Pitch:	1200/s;	Pan:	1800/sSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 30 2.2.3 Camera

2.2.3.1	Name

– X3

2.2.3.2	Model

– FC350

2.2.3.3	Total	Pixels

– 12.76M

2.2.3.4	Effective	Pixels

– 12.4M 2.2.3.5	Image	Max	Size

– 4000x3000 2.2.3.6	ISO	Range

– 100

- 3200

2.2.3.7	F ield	of	View

- 940

2.2.3.8	CMOS

– Sony	EXMOR	1/2.3” 2.2.3.9	HD	Video	Recording

– UHD(4K):	4096x2160p24/25,	3840x2160p24/25/30; FHD:	1920x1080p24/25/30/48/50/60;	HD:	1280x720p24/25/30/48/50/60

2.2.3.10	Operating	Temperature	Range

- 320F

- 1040F	(00C

- 4 00C)

2.2.4 Radio	Control Transmitter

2.2.4.1	Name

– C1 2.2.4.2	Operating	Frequency

– 5.728

- 5.850GHz;	2.400

- 2.483GHz 2.2.4.3	Communicating	Distance	(unobstructed)

– 2000m 2.2.4.4	Output	Power

– 9W 2.2.4.5	Operating	Temperature	Range

- 140F	to	1040F	(

- 100C	to	400C) 2.2.4.6	Battery

– 600mAh	LiPo	2SSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 31 APPENDIX

– B DJI	Inspire	1 User,	Maintenance,	Safety Manual s

DJI	INSPIRE	1	USER	MANUAL

(see	referenced	external	document)

http://sidrones.com/drones/downloads/i nspire/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1

- 2.pdf

DJI	INSPIRE	1 MAINTENANCE MANUAL

(see	referenced	external	document)

http://sidrones.com/drones/downloads/inspire/ Inspire _Maintenance_Manual.pdf

DJI	INSPIRE	1 SAFETY MANUAL

(see	referenced	external	document)

http://sidrones.com/drones/downloads/inspire/Inspire_1_Safety_Guidelines.pdfSpitz	Industrial	Design

- Petition	for	Exemption 32 APPENDIX

– C DJI	INSPIRE	1	Maintenance	Log