alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: KARLA B. VARELA CASE NUMBER:21-21656-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for March 22, 2022, hearing. All amendments and documents for the March 22, 2022,

hearing were due as of March 4, 2022 (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

1AP served on 2/28

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 4/26:

Due on or before 5pm on 3/29: 1) FMV of 97 Toyota, 2) LF67, 3) 2021 tax returns missing Sch 1/C/E, 4) 

BDQ, balance sheet & business bank stmts 3months pre-petition, 5) bank stmts #5046 (9/22-10/21), 6) affidavit 

of support

**AMENDED PLANS MUST USE NEW PLAN FORM (4/1/22)**

Case 21-21656-AJC Doc 37 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 1
LLANO FINANCING GROUP, LLC, Appellant, v. Ernest KIRKLAND and Kirkland Valuation Services, LLC, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2699

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Yeniel Tejera PENA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-780

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 221

Tanner L. Narloch, Plaintiff

v. Neenah N. Narloch, Defendant and Appellant

and State of North Dakota, S tatutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20210153

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.
Per Curiam

. Elise A. Fischer (argued) and Theresa Kellington (on brief) , Bismarck, ND

, for defendant and appellant.1 Narloch v. Narloch No. 20210153

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Neenah Narloch appeals from a second amended divorce judgment. She argues the evidence does not support the district court’s decision denying her motion to relocate to Wyoming with the partie s’ minor children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Real-time validation of the Dst Predictor model      

      February 28, 2015    

The Dst Predictor model, which has been running real-time in the Space Weather Analysis and Forecast System (SWAFS), provides 1-hour and 4-hour forecasts of the Dst index. This is useful for awareness of impending geomagnetic activity, as well as driving other real-time models that use Dst as an input. In this report, we examine the performance of this forecast model in detail. When validating indices it should be noted that performance is only with respect to a reference index as they are derived quantities assumed to reflect a state of the magnetosphere that cannot be directly measured. In this case U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Definitive Dst is the reference index (Section 3). Whether or not the model better reflects the actual activity level is nearly impossible to discern and is outside the scope of this report. We evaluate the performance of the model by computing continuous predictant skill scores against USGS Definitive Dst values as “observations” (Section 4.2). The two sets of data are not well-correlated for both 1-hour and 4-hour forecasts. The Dst Predictor Prediction Efficiency for both the 1- and 4-hour forecasts suggests poor performance versus the climatological mean. However, the skill score against a nowcast persistence model is positive, suggesting value added by the Dst Predictor model. We further examine statistics for storm times (Section 4.3) with similar results: nowcast persistence performs worse than Dst Predictor.  Dst Predictor is superior to the nowcast persistence model for the metric used in this study. We recommend continued use of the DstPredictor model for 1-and4-hour Dst predictions along with active study of other Dst forecast models that do not rely on nowcast inputs (Section 6). The lack of certified requirements makes further recommendations difficult. A study of how the error in Dst translates to error in models and a better understanding of operational needs for magnetic storm warning are needed to determine such requirements. Nowcast persistence is often hard to beat for short term forecasts and specification and Dst Predictor clearly performs well against that standard (with 1-hour and 4-hour skill-scores of 0.233 and 0.485 respectively), although poor in absolute terms (with1-hourand4-hour prediction efficiencies of-64.6and-43.1, respectively).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-ASO-40]


Proposed Amendment to Class D and E2 Airspace; Orlando, FL.

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-786 beginning on page 1698 in the 
issue of Monday, January 13, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 1699, in the first column, under ASO FL D Orlando, FL 
[Revised], in the sixth line, ``1,500 feet'' should read ``1,600 
feet''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Cesar J. ALAS, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1638

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Weak-field magnetic susceptibility anisotropy and its dynamic measurement      

      January 1, 1977    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Seismic hazard assessment for areas of volcanic activity in western Kingdom of Saudi Arabia      

      December 29, 2023    

View Report

Earthquake swarms caused by volcanic activity, tectonic stresses, or industrial operations (oil and gas production) can pose considerable risk for nearby settlements. As a rule, a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) that is based on time-independent earthquakes does not take into account earthquake swarms because of their statistically time-dependent nature. We describe the technique and application of a scenario-based method for the estimation of seismic hazard from earthquake swarms that may occur in areas of volcanic activity in western Saudi Arabia. The method consists of the generation of a large number of scenario seismic swarms followed by the calculation of ground motion in a site of interest for all earthquakes in all of the swarms. The set of calculated ground-motion values permits the construction and analysis of probability distribution functions for possible ground-motion levels during the hypothetical earthquake swarms. The level of ground motion representing the hazard is selected considering an appropriate value of the probability of exceedance or non-exceedance, depending on the goal of the study. This swarm-scenario-based seismic hazard assessment may provide a valuable supplement to an ordinary PSHA and (or) deterministic seismic hazard assessment that are commonly used for emergency response and post-earthquake recovery management.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Climate
                  - Geology
                  - Information Systems
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - kingdom of saudi arabia

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001097900
<NAME> BASIC ENERGY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       644,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (720,025)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         57,536
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,257,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,568,490
<PP&E>                                         216,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,826,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,588,884
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,744
<OTHER-SE>                                     77,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,826,412
<SALES>                                        606,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               606,739
<CGS>                                          406,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  630,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               178,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (217,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (217,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (217,346)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the annual report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer (and interim principal executive officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



January 10, 2006                       /s/ Robert H. Nelson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer
                                      (and interim principal executive officer)





          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

          The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered
filed as part of the Report.
Ned:

There is no lower temperature to be compliant with th e letter of the method. However, as you lower the tem perature the possibility of bias increases. At lower temperatures, the concentration of the SO2 in the water can increase and may result in greater conversion of SO2 to SO3. So from the view of the tested source (and hopefully the view of the source te ster) you would want to achieve a temperature in the impinger b ox that maximizes the exit temperature but does not go o ver 85 F. While you may place all of the impingers in the same ice cold impinger box, the data you obtain may be biased hi gh against
your client.

_________________________________ Ron Myers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policy and Programs Division Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05
RTP NC 27711

Tel. 919.541.5407

Fax 919.541.1039 E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov

Hello,

I have a question regarding the exit temperature of th e CPM filter for OTM-28. The method states that it sho uld be below 85 degrees F, is there a lower temperature threshold we should not fall below? If not, is it necessary to have the dropout impingers separate from the ice bath impingers? Thank yo u for fielding this question.

Regards,
Ned Shappley

NED SHAPPLEY

QA Associate 

### METCO Environmental

nshappley@testamericainc.com

Tel 972-931-7127

Cell 469-261-3650

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication, including any attachments, may contain privileged or confidential information for specific individual s and is protected by law. If you are not the inten ded recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, dis tribution or copying of this communication is stric tly prohibited and you should delete this message and its attachme nts from your computer without retaining any copies . If you have received this communication in error, please r eply to the sender immediately. We appreciate your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing thi s e

- mail. From: "Ned Shappley" <nshappley@metcoenv.com>

To: Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/07/2009 11:50 AM

Subject: OTM-28 

### Page 1 of 1

8/25/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4C752485Do

...
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90307]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7100

[WY-930-1430-01; WYW-83357]


Partial Revocation of Secretarial Orders of October 20, 1917, May 
6, 1918, May 16, 1918, August 28, 1934, and July 12, 1939; Wyoming

Correction

    In rule document 94-27690 beginning on page 55820, in the issue of 
Wednesday, November 9, 1994, make the following correction:
    On page 55821, in the first column, in the land description, in the 
first line, ``Sec. 31, lots 1 to 4, inclusive, E\1/2\, and E\1/2\W\1/
4\.'' should read ``Sec. 31, lots 1 to 4, inclusive, E\1/2\, and E\1/
2\W\1/2\.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Gregory PAPPAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1683

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 3, 2018

Gregory Pappas, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Lewis, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 2964 Dir ID: 2014

- NM

- 206

- AD



## FAA MC AI AD W ORK S HEET (CONTINUED)

Contacts. With w h om o u tsi d e the F A A has t h is pr o p os al be en dis c u s se d ?

Org a ni z a t i on Per s on C o nta c ted Da t e Re sp on s e

Nat i onal Bus i ness Aircraft As s o ciat i o n Eli Cotti 10 / 3 / 1 4

R e gio n al Airline As s o ci a ti o n 10 / 3 / 1 4

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10 / 3 / 1 4

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 10 / 3 / 1 4
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 09, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 09, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0136. WILLIAM ERIC HUMMEL v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: CR1200547
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Submarine groundwater discharge and nutrient addition to the coastal zone and coral reefs of leeward Hawai'i      

      January 1, 2008    

Multiple tracers of groundwater input (salinity, Si, 223Ra, 224Ra, and 226Ra) were used together to determine the magnitude, character (meteoric versus seawater), and nutrient contribution associated with submarine groundwater discharge across the leeward shores of the Hawai'ian Islands Maui, Moloka'i, and Hawai'i. Tracer abundances were elevated in the unconfined coastal aquifer and the nearshore zone, decreasing to low levels offshore, indicative of groundwater discharge (near-fresh, brackish, or saline) at all locations. At several sites, we detected evidence of fresh and saline SGD occurring simultaneously. Conservative estimates of SGD fluxes ranged widely, from 0.02-0.65??m3??m- 2 d- 1at the various sites. Groundwater nutrient fluxes of 0.04-40??mmol N m- 2 d- 1 and 0.01-1.6??mmol P m- 2 d- 1 represent a major source of new nutrients to coastal ecosystems along these coasts. Nutrient additions were typically greatest at locations with a substantial meteoric component in groundwater, but the recirculation of seawater through the aquifer may provide a means of transferring terrestrially-derived nutrients to the coastal zone at several sites. ?? 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Use of social indices to predict reproductive success in canvasbacks      

      January 1, 1990    

We correlated temporal changes in social groupings of canvasbacks (Aythya valisineria) breeding near Minnedosa, Manitoba, with an independent estimate of hen success during 1974-80. Roadside counts of pairs, lone males, and flocked males were made along transects at 5-day intervals, normalized to percentages to allow comparisons among years, and plotted to obtain measurements of selected areas between and under the curves. An estimate of hen success was regressed on these selected graph areas each year to derive a predictive equation. Graph areas (social indices) determined from temporal changes in the proportion of pairs, lone males, and flocked males correlated (ri?? = 0.69-0.93) with hen success. This technique avoids the need for pair counts, nest searches, and brood counts and provides managers with a useful index to evaluate local management practices and to predict yearly production in time for setting hunting regulations.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 17, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40917]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Part 2560

RIN 1004-AC90

Alaska Occupany and Use; Alaska Homestead Settlement

Correction

    Final Rule document 96-22704 was inadvertently published in the 
Proposed Rules section of the issue of Tuesday, September 10, 1996, 
beginning on page 47724. It should have appeared in the Rules and 
Regulations section.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Case 21-12136-MAM Doc 2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-12136-MAM Doc 2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 2
Ernest VICTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-615

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.