alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Spickard Law P.C.

12222 Merit Drive, Suite 305

Dallas, Texas 75251

(214) 460-2337

(214) 276-7553 (fax)
www.spickardlaw.com

August 24, 2015

Clerk of the Court Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Building

600 C ommerce Street, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75202

Re : Court of Appeals Number: 05-14-01477- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 13-04197-J James David Horton and Jeffrey Horton v. Kimberly A. Stovall Individually, and
Stovall & Associates, P.C. Notice of Change of Address

Dear Clerk

,

Please note our new office address:

Todd S. Spickard Spickard Law P.C. 12222 Merit Drive, Suite 305 Dallas, Texas 752 51 (214) 460-2337 (214) 276-7553 (fax) todd@spickardlaw.com www.spickardlaw.com

Sincerely,

Spickard Law P.C.



## Todd S. Spickard

Todd S. Spickard todd@spickardlaw.com

cc: Lawrence Mealer, Esq. ACCEPTED

05-14-01477-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

8/24/2015 3:24:59 PM

LISA MATZ

CLERK
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




I,
      John
      Mueller, Chief Financial Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do
      hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
      States Code that:




(1)
      the
      Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period
      ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an
      exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                November 14, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                John MuellerJohn
                Mueller
              Chief
                Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6436

MICHAEL J. GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM O. (BILL) HUFFMAN; WILLIAM J. SADLER; GEORGE V. 

SITLER; SCOTT A. ASH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, 

at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-02344)

Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Greene, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Greene appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge to dismiss Greene’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Greene v. Huffman, No. 1:17-cv-02344 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 18, 2018). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Mark H. STIMSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0755

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Studying the Earth from space      

      January 1, 1981    

Space age technology contains a key to increased knowledge about the Earth's resources; this key is remote sensing detecting the nature or condition of something without actually touching it. An early and still most useful form of remote sensing is photography which records thescene, as man sees it, on film sensitive to that part of the electromagnetic spectrum called visible energy. Electromagnetic energy travels in waves of various lengths; most are invisible to the human eye. Wavelengths progressively longer than those that the eye can see are infrared and microwave. Wavelengths progressively shorter than the eye can see are ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Earth

View All **
708 A.2d 681

#### John Marvin BOOTH v. STATE of Maryland.

Misc. No. 41,

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 7, 1998.

Nevett Steele, Jr., Towson, for appellant.

Gwynn X. Kinsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Submitted to BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER, WILNER and CATHELL, JJ.

ORDER

The Court having considered the application of John Marvin Booth for leave to appeal the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief, the response in opposition thereto, the supplementary exhibits, the *pro se*supplemental answer to the State’s response, and the *pro se*application for review and certification of questions, etc. in the above-captioned case, it is this 7th day of April, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the applications be, and they are hereby, denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2019

No. 04-18-00384-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Desiree Renee GOMEZ,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 542323

Honorable John Longoria, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza Rodriguez, Justice

The trial court has filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. We therefore ORDER

this appeal reinstated on this court’s active docket.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Suntron Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James
K. Bass, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ James K. Bass
    
    March 26, 2004James K. Bass
    
    DateChief Executive Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5160 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include as part of the buildings 

and grounds of the National Gallery of Art any buildings and other 

areas within the boundaries of any real estate or other property interests 

acquired by the National Gallery of Art. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2016 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include as part 

of the buildings and grounds of the National Gallery 

of Art any buildings and other areas within the boundaries of any real estate or other property interests acquired by the National Gallery of Art. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5160 IH

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER AREAS 

2 WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF REAL ESTATE OR 

3 OTHER PROPERTY INTERESTS ACQUIRED BY 

4 NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART. 

5 Section 6301(2) of title 40, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

8 by striking ‘‘The National Gallery of Art’’ and in9 serting ‘‘(A) The National Gallery of Art’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

11 and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; 

12 and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(B) All other buildings, service roads, 

16 walks, and other areas within the exterior 

17 boundaries of any real estate or land or interest 

18 in land (including temporary use) that the Na19 tional Gallery of Art acquires and that the Di20 rector of the National Gallery of Art determines 

21 to be necessary for the adequate protection of 

22 individuals or property in the National Gallery 

23 of Art and suitable for administration as a part 

24 of the National Gallery of Art.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0006. DARWIN POMPEY v. ARENTRIA MURRAY.

At the request of Arentria Murray, the trial court entered a twelve-month

stalking protective order against Darwin Pompey. Pompey filed a motion to aside the

protective order pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), which the trial court denied.

Pompey then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside under OCGA

§ 9-11-60 (d) must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), (b); Jim Ellis Atlanta v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116-117

(640 SE2d 688) (2006). Second, appeals of orders in domestic relations cases,

including those that involve family violence,1 must also be taken by application for

discretionary appeal. See OCGA§ 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b); Schmidt v.Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461,

461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), disapproved on other grounds by Gilliam v. State,

312 Ga. 60, 64 (860 SE2d 543) (2021). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals 

1“Family violence” isdefined under the Family Violence Act as the occurrence

of specified acts, including stalking, “between past or present spouses, persons who

are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren,

foster parents and foster children, and other persons living or formerly living in the

same household.” OCGA § 19-13-1. Pompey and Murray are parents of the same

minor child.

August 05, 2024
procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257,

257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Thus, Pompey’s failure to file a discretionary application

deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal. See id.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/05/2024
Case 21-19085-EPK Doc 14 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-19085-EPK Doc 14 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-19085-EPK Doc 14 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           USGS Critical Minerals Review: 2021      

      May 1, 2022    

In 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) continued to play a central role in understanding and anticipating potential supply chain disruptions by defining and quantitatively evaluating mineral criticality.  In addition, the USGS continued to evaluate new sources of domestic critical minerals by conducting mineral resource assessments, mapping and surveying regions prospective for critical minerals, re-assessing mine waste, and pursuing fundamental research in support of responsible, sustainable mining.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Steven M Fortier (Former Employee)          

##### Center Director

National Minerals Information Center

#### Nedal T Nassar

##### Chief, Materials Flow Analysis Section

National Minerals Information Center

nnassar@usgs.gov

703-648-7725

#### Garth E Graham

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ggraham@usgs.gov

303-236-1558

#### Jane M. Hammarstrom

##### Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

jhammars@usgs.gov

703-648-6165

#### Warren C Day, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus 

Mineral Resources Program

wday@usgs.gov

303-384-2682

#### Jeffrey L Mauk

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

jmauk@usgs.gov

303-236-5605

#### Robert R. Seal

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

rseal@usgs.gov

703-648-6290

## Related Content

####             Steven M Fortier (Former Employee)          

##### Center Director

National Minerals Information Center

#### Nedal T Nassar

##### Chief, Materials Flow Analysis Section

National Minerals Information Center

nnassar@usgs.gov

703-648-7725

#### Garth E Graham

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ggraham@usgs.gov

303-236-1558

#### Jane M. Hammarstrom

##### Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

jhammars@usgs.gov

703-648-6165

#### Warren C Day, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus 

Mineral Resources Program

wday@usgs.gov

303-384-2682

#### Jeffrey L Mauk

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

jmauk@usgs.gov

303-236-5605

#### Robert R. Seal

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

rseal@usgs.gov

703-648-6290

### Contact

####               National Minerals Information Center          

988 National Center12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

nmicrecordsmgt@usgs.gov

703-648-4995
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2852

___________

Scott Scanlon, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Correctional Medical Services; *

Roland Anderson, Regional *

Medical Director, CMS; Max *

Mobley, Deputy Director, Arkansas *

Department of Correction; Dr. Robin *

Hickerson, Former ADC Psychiatrist; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Dr. Solomon Mogbo, Former CMS *

Doctor, ADC; Lorne Ryan, Consult *

Doctor, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 23, 2005 

Filed: March 24, 2005 

___________

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas.

-2-

In this interlocutory appeal, Arkansas prisoner Scott Scanlon contests the

district court’s1

 denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. Scanlon claims that

defendants are violating the Eighth Amendment through their deliberate indifference

to his serious medical needs, and requests transfer to “an appropriate medical

facility.”

The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that a preliminary

injunction was not warranted in this case because Scanlon showed neither a threat of

irreparable harm nor a probability of success on the merits. The record reflects that

Scanlon is receiving ongoing medical care, and that he merely disagrees with

defendant medical providers’ diagnoses and treatment. See Bandag, Inc. v. Jack’s

Tire & Oil, Inc., 190 F.3d 924, 926 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (standard of review);

Smith v. Marcantonio, 910 F.2d 500, 502 (8th Cir. 1990) (mere disagreement with

course of treatment does not state constitutional claim for deliberate indifference);

Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C.L. Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc)

(factors to consider in deciding whether to grant preliminary injunction). 

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           On the watch for geomagnetic storms      

      January 1, 1997    

View Document

Geomagnetic storms, induced by solar activity, pose significant hazards to satellites, electrical power distribution systems, radio communications, navigation, and geophysical surveys. Strong storms can expose astronauts and crews of high-flying aircraft to dangerous levels of radiation. Economic losses from recent geomagnetic storms have run into hundreds of millions of dollars. With the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) as the lead agency, an international network of geomagnetic observatories monitors the onset of solar-induced storms and gives warnings that help diminish losses to military and commercial operations and facilities.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
STATE EX REL. Tommy J. GIOELE v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0766

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in *256La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The District Court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
U W OFFICES 

HERBERT A. ROSENTHAL, CHARTERED 

5101 WISCONSIN AVENUE, NW, f(210 

Washington, D.C. 20016 6120 

TELEPHONE: (202) 785-9773 TELECOPIER: (202) 659-3526 

www. lierl>c'nrosenihal. com e-mail: herbt'rt@herherir(iseniluil. com 

Herbert A. Rosenthal (DC)(MD) Charles F. Gormly (DC)(MD) 

Of Counsel: William F. Burton (DC/VA/MD) 

April 12, 2010 

Mr- Paul L. Gretch 

Director eOffice of International Aviation (DOT) 

Room W86-316 

12 0 0 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

re: Transportes Aeromar and Aeromexico: Code Sh^re 

Docket OST 2005-20.954 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

By Notice of Action Taken dated June 22, 2005, the Department 

approved the Code Share arrangement between Transportes Aeromar and 

Aeromexico. 

Aeromar has informed its counsel that that code share agreement and 

operations thereunder terminated some time ago. 

^.-•- ^ 

CJ 

o 

- a 

— 1 

7 —^ 

. 1 : •". O 

:_.r.) 

5^ 

s 

Respectfully submitted, 

Herbert A. Rosenthal 

Attorney for Transportes Aeromar 

cc: Docket Section 

US Department of Transportation 

Room W12-140 

12 0 0 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

i : \aeromar\amcodesl.004
Harold K. SWIFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB Case No.: 21-13230-EPK

 Chapter 7

Debtor.

/

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB Adv. No.: 21-01155-MAM

Plaintiff,

v.

MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION LOAN 

AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION OF THE UNITED STATES AND

THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA.

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION 

FOR DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT,

MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION LOAN AUTHORITY (DE #41)

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on December 21, 2022.

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 49 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2
THIS MATTER came before the Court on December 14, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. upon the

Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Default Final Judgment as to Defendant, Missouri Higher Education 

Loan Authority (DE #41; the “Motion”). The Court, having no one appear in opposition, and being 

otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that good cause exists to grant the Motion. 

It is therefore ORDERED:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff, Christi Lee Straub, may submit its Default Final Judgment against 

Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority for failure to timely answer the Complaint and 

Summons.

###

Submitted by:

Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 64500

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

500 NE 4th St., Suite 200

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 765-3166

Facsimile: (954) 756-7103

Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

Chad Van Horn, Esq. is hereby directed to provide a conformed copy of this Order to all parties-ininterest and to file a Certificate of Service as to same.

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 49 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 46553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 338

RIN 3206-AH85


 Qualification Requirements (General)

Correction

    In rule document 97-22005 appearing on page 44535 in the issue of 
Friday, August 22, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 44535, in the second column, in the first line of the first 
paragraph, ``will'' should read ``will not''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Monetary Systems, Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Donald F. Mardak, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Donald F. Mardak
 Donald F. Mardak
  Principal Executive Officer
 
 August 10, 2010
 
  This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10405]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------