alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: JULY 23, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTINE CLOUD DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0321 (Civil Penalty Action).

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Agency") has filed a Motion for Judgmenton the Pleadings dated July 15, 2014. The Agency avers in its Complaintthat on March 28, 2014, Christine Cloud (hereinafter "Respondent") was advised through a Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty that the Agency proposedto assess a civil penalty in the amount of$1,000. On May 12, 2014, a FinalNotice ofProposed Civil Penalty in the amount of$1,000 was issued. On May 26, 2014, Respondent submitted a writtenrequest for ahearing. The Agency avers inits motionthat Complainant served the complaint on Respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested, on June 3, 2014. Respondent received the complainton June 6, 2014. Respondenthas failed to file an Answerto the Complaint not laterthan 30 days after service ofthe complaint1• WHEREFORE, itbe and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Onor before September 1, 2014, Respondent shall file a response to this Order statingwhy the reliefrequested in the Agency's Motion should notbe granted; and 2. On or before September 1, 2014, Respondent shall answerthe Complaint; and 3. On or before September 1, 2014, Respondent shall fully comply with our Procedural Order; and

1 14 C.F.R. § 13.209 (a). L

.**~** i :



### i

### i;4. Absentfull and complete responses to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 hereinabove, Respondent maybe sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations inthe Complaint may be deemed admitted; and/or Respondent may beprecluded from introducing any evidence at the hearing other than his own testimony; and/or Respondent's Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default Judgment may be entered against Respondent in the full amount ofthe fine requested bythe Agency in its Complaint.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

2SERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Christine Cloud, Respondent 12661 Tanada Circle, Apt. 2 Anchorage, AK 99515 Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Senior Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 222 West

## ih Avenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0321 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
Yakutat School District 

City & Borough of Yakutat 

429 Forest Hwy. P.O. Box 429 

akutat, Alaska 99689 

District Office (907) 784-3317 

High School (907) 784-33 ~8 

Fax (907)784.;3446 

November 14,2014 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket OST -1998-4899 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

On behalf of the Yakutat School District, I am pleased to write in support of the renewal of 

Alaska Airlines' essential air service agreement permitting them to continue large plane service 

for the community of Yakutat, Alaska. 

Yakutat, the most isolated community in the United States, is over two hundred miles from any 

other populated area. With the largest coastal mountain range in the world reaching heights of 

eighteen thousand to the North and the East and the Gulf of Alaska to the South and West, we 

have no means of road access and we never will. 

The Yakutat School District is dependent on air service that Alaska Airlines provides to Yakutat. 

Without Alaska Airlines air freight service we would not be able to provide fresh fruit, vegetables 

and other perishables for our child nutrition program. Our school student groups: athletic teams, 

art club, student government, would not be able to travel to other schools or communities to 

participate in athletic, cultural, academic and social programs and other school student groups 

will not be able to come to Yakutat to participate in Yakutat School sponsored activities as well. 

Our staff and school board would not be able to travel to participate in professional development 

activities in other towns and communities. 

This is just a short list of advantages highlighting the importance of having Alaska Airlines serve 

the community of Yakutat. 

On behalf of the Yakutat School Board, our staff and students and our community of Yakutat, I 

urge you to give favorable consideration to Alaska Airlines' application and renew their essential 

air service agreement to serve Yakutat and other Alaska communities. 

~~ Robin Gray, Superintendent
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by

 

§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date: November 6, 2007 | By:    |  /s/ Steven C. Ackmann |                                               |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                        |  Steven  C. Ackmann,                          |
|                        |   |                        |   President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                             |        |                             |                                                    |  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-60317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-209824-96]
RIN 1545-AU24


Definition of Limited Partner for Self-Employment Tax Purposes

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-701, beginning on page 1702 in the 
issue of Monday, January 13, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 1.1402(a)-2  [Corrected]

    On page 1704, in the third column, in the last line, ``1705'' 
should be removed.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Filed: July 26, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1203 (CA-00-15-2) Sherry D. Battle, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Charles Studds, etc., et al., Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER The court amends its opinion filed July 19, 2000, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 5 -- the panel information is corrected to read: “Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.” For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor ClerkUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1203

SHERRY D. BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCHARLES STUDDS, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Magistrate for the City of Norfolk; CITY OF NORFOLK; RALPH HAMLIN; KEITH DAVIES; D. A. NEWMAN, Individually and in their official capacities as Sergeants for the Norfolk Police Department, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-15-2) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherry D. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Sherry D. Battle appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failing to comply with a pre-filinginjunction entered on October 20, 1999. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Battle v. Studds , No. CA-00-15-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Form CGFCRD3T (06/11/22)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−12609−AJC

Chapter: 15

In re:

Performance Insurance Company SPC

c/o Sequor Law

1111 Brickell Avenue

Suite 1250

Miami, FL 33131

EIN: 00−0000000

Neil Dempsey

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable A. Jay Cristol to consider the

following:

Motion to Authorize Distribution of Estate Funds Held in the United States to the Cayman Islands

(Relief Requested Without a Hearing) Filed by Foreign Representatives Neil Dempsey, Kenneth M.

Krys. ECF#57

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: November 10, 2022

Time: 02:00 PM

Location: Telephone by CourtSolutions LLC

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by telephone. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Individuals not

represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services free of charge. Although conducted

by telephone, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed.

All participants must exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with

the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 11/1/22 CLERK OF COURT

By: Susan Gutierrez

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 58 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 2
Courtroom Deputy

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 58 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 2
DALK LAND, LP, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) for the quarterly period endedMarch  31,  2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Paul N. Saleh, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/   Paul N.Saleh            

Name: Paul N.SalehTitle:   Chief FinancialOfficerDate:   May 15, 2006

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Where is the water? Agriculture [poster]              

      March 26, 2024    

View Report

View Report

Description

Water is an integral part of how we interact with the environment and live our everyday lives. This educational poster illustrates agricultural water use, how water moves, and different ways that water is used both naturally and through human interaction. This poster is intended for eighth-grade audiences and younger.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Hayley Corson-Dosch

##### Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

hcorson-dosch@usgs.gov

#### Cee Nell, PhD

##### Data Visualization Specialist

Water Resources Mission Area

cnell@usgs.gov

608-828-9901

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Hayley Corson-DoschHydrologistWater Resources Mission AreaEmailhcorson-dosch@usgs.govCee Nell, PhDData Visualization SpecialistWater Resources Mission AreaEmailcnell@usgs.govPhone608-828-9901
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2017

s0123

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2017

153505

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153505

COA: 330907

Oakland CC: 2010-232531-FC

EDDIE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT former appellate counsel, 

Michael A. Faraone, to file a supplemental brief addressing the reason(s) for his failure to 

file in the Court of Appeals, on direct review, a delayed application for leave to appeal 

within the deadlines set forth in former MCR 7.205(F), currently MCR 7.205(G). 

Counsel shall file the supplemental brief within 28 days of the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
Exhibit 13.2





Certification Pursuant to




8 U.S.C.  Section 1350,




as Adopted Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anita Soni, Director – Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Anita SoniName:
Anita SoniTitle:
Director (Finance)Date:
September 28, 2010





The foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purposes.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Streamflow reconstruction in the Upper Missouri River Basin using a novel Bayesian network model      

      August 8, 2019    

A Bayesian model that uses the spatial dependence induced by the river network topology, and the leading principal components of regional tree-ring chronologies for paleo-streamflow reconstruction is presented.  In any river basin, a convergent, dendritic network of tributaries comes together to form the main stem of a river.  Consequently, it is natural to think of a spatial Markov process that recognizes this topological structure to develop a spatially consistent basin-scale streamflow reconstruction model that uses the information in streamflow and tree-ring chronology data to inform the reconstructed flows, while maintaining the space-time correlation structure of flows that is critical for water resource assessments and management. Given historical data from multiple streamflow gauges along a river, their tributaries in a watershed, and regional tree-ring chronologies, the model is fit and used to simultaneously reconstruct the full network of paleo-streamflow at all gauges in the basin progressing upstream to downstream along the river. The spatial network structure allows a substantial reduction in the uncertainty associated with paleo-streamflow as one proceeds downstream in the network and the spatial dependence structure increases the information content. Our application to eighteen streamflow gauges in the Upper Missouri River Basin shows that the mean adjusted-R2 for the basin is approximately 0.5 with good overall cross-validated skill as measured by five different skill metrics. A comparison with the traditional principal components regression shows that the spatial Bayesian model offers improvements, as downstream gauges are informed by the reconstruction of the upstream gauges, as well as the tree-ring chronologies.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Greg Pederson, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center

gpederson@usgs.gov

406-994-7390

## Related Content

#### Greg Pederson, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center

gpederson@usgs.gov

406-994-7390

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK) Headquarters          

2327 University WaySuite 2Bozeman, MT59715United States

406-994-7544

406-994-6556

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Missouri River Basin
                  - Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHAWN FRIEDMAN,

Appellant,

v.

TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D13-379

[December 17, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 11-6295 (02).

Marlene S. Reiss of Marlene S. Reiss, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. See Kuehner v. Green, 436 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1983); Black v. 

District Bd. of Trustees, 491 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., MAY and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Report on Form 10-QSB of Total Luxury Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sandy J. Masselli,
Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005

                                       /s/ Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Sandy J. Masselli, Jr.,
                                       Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51416 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-MEJIA, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Mejia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-520-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Evaristo Rodriguez-Mejia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.