alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chinuntdet. He will be joining Monday’s meeting by phone to talk through the protocols in detail, and

answer these questions. Your first and last questions are fairly straightforward, so let me try to address

those: (1) you’re correct that Method 0010 is redundant there; the plan is to use CARB 429 for PAH5;

and (2) you’re also correct that Method 5D is the better method for measuring velocity; the low flow

measurement in the baghouse was a carryover from an earlier proposal before the testing expanded

exponentially to its current scope.

From: Conrad Chin [mailto:Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 8:02 AM

To: Amy M. Lincoln

Cc: Chuck French; Cohn Boswell; Jason Dewees; JKonrady@fpiwv.com; Mike Toney; Richard Lunn; Robin

Segall; r. powell@optimaacq.com; Steffan Johnson; Raymond MerrillSubject: RE: Felman Test Protocols

Good morning AmyBelow are some of the preliminary comments on the two test protocols Felman submitted:

• In the bid for the July test, the tester proposes testing of PAH with Method 0010 and CARB

Method 429. There is no need for Method 0010 and CARB Method 429 should be used alone.

• In the bid for the 1 Q 2013 test at Felman, the tester proposes testing of dioxins/furans/PCB/PAH

using a combination of Method 0010, Method 23, and CARB Method 429 with explanation as tohow these methods with be combined. First, again there is no need for Method 0010. Second,

though we are aware that this has been done previously, there is currently no written method for

measurement these four classes of compounds simultaneously, so we will need to see more

details on the sampling and analysis procedure that will be followed.

• The tester proposes to use an electronic low flow manometer to measure the velocity in individual

baghouse compartments. The Method 5D technique is likely the more appropriate flow ratemeasurement in this situation. It avoids the questions raised about “how does one conduct aproper traverse of the baghouse above the bags in all compartments” questions by providing anaccurately measured system flow rate up front.

We can over these again next Monday, as our test experts are planning to participate in the meeting.

Have a good weekend!

Conrad Chin

Mail Code D243-02Metals and Minerals Group

Sector Policies and Programs DivisionOffice of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

919-541-1512 (voice)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date: August 5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Ackmann                  |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Steven  C. Ackmann,                    |
|                      |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

36

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001097900
<NAME> BASIC ENERGY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,419
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       644,469
<OTHER-SE>                                    (659,888)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,419)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.002)


</TABLE>
Mark M. HESSEIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. REEF CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2381

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of E and S Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Eugene H.
Swearengin, Vice-President, Secretary and Director of the company, certify,
pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
          (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                             By: /s/ Eugene H. Swearengin
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Eugene H. Swearengin

Dated: August 24 , 2004
      -----------------
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5252 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located at 1400 Lower Island Road 

in Tornillo, Texas, as the ‘‘Marcelino Serna Port of 

Entry’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5252 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. MARCELINO SERNA PORT OF ENTRY. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States Customs and 

3 Border Protection Port of Entry located at 1400 Lower 

4 Island Road in Tornillo, Texas, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Marcelino Serna Port of Entry’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the port of entry referred to in subsection (a) 

9 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marcelino Serna 

10 Port of Entry’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0001092797
<NAME> SPACE LAUNCHES FINANCING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         111,545
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       61
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,252
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00




</TABLE>
Brett D. HEBDON, Appellant, v. Marjorie KATEHAKIS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3559

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION 

 

In re: Case No. 18-20320-LMI

ARC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC.

Chapter 7

Debtor.

____________________________________/

BARRY E. MUKAMAL AS CHAPTER 7

TRUSTEE,

Plaintiff, Adv. Pro. No.20-01333-LMI

-vsYOELVYS LOPEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 

FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT

This matter came on before the Court, on February 3rd, 2021, at 3:00 p.m., for 

hearing on the Plaintiff’s Verified Motion For Entry Of Default Final Judgment Against

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 5, 2021.

Case 20-01333-LMI Doc 18 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Defendant [ECF No. 11] (the “Motion”), on notice to the Defendant, and the Court, having 

reviewed the file and docket, noting the entry of the Clerk’s Default [ECF No. 8] against 

the Defendant, and the fact that the Defendant has not responded to the Amended 

Complaint [ECF No. 4], taking notice that all well-pled allegations are deemed admitted 

as no responsive pleading has been filed,1 heard argument and proffer of the Trustee’s 

Counsel, finding good cause shown, and as announced on the record, does hereby

ORDER and ADJUDGE that:

1. The Motion [ECF No.11] is GRANTED; and, a separate Final 

Judgment shall be entered in conformity with this Order.

###

Submitted by:

James B. Miller, Esq. (Counsel to Trustee)

19 West Flagler St, Suite 416

Miami, FL 33130

Copies to (via CM/ECF in pdf format):

James B. Miller, Esq. 

1 See, James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life, 402 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir. 2005).

Case 20-01333-LMI Doc 18 Filed 02/08/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - connect_locations(2)

## By Location

              - arizona(33)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(28)
              - 2023(25)
              - 2022(50)
              - 2021(37)
              - 2020(2)
              - (-)2019(37)

partnerArizona Department of Transportation

partnerCity of Tucson, Arizona

partnerTown of Marana, Arizona

partnerPima County, Arizona

partnerTown of Oro Valley, Arizona

partnerCentral Arizona Project

partnerArizona Geological Survey

partnerCity of Prescott, Arizona

partnerCity of Phoenix, Arizona

partnerArizona State University

partnerArizona State Parks

partnerCity of Cottonwood, Arizona

partnerCity of Glendale, Arizona

partnerMohave County, Arizona

partnerNavajo County, Arizona

partnerApache County of Arizona

partnerGreenlee County, Arizona

partnerCoconino County, Arizona

partnerMuseum of Northern Arizona

partnerCity of Flagstaff, Arizona

partnerPinal County, Arizona

partnerArizona Department of Environmental Quality

partnerArizona Department of Water Resources

partnerTown of Prescott Valley, Arizona

partnerSaguaro National Park, Arizona

partnerArizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs

partnerArizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD)

partnerTumacácori National Historical Park, Arizona

locationArizona Water Science Center, Tucson Office

partnerUniversity of Arizona Water Resources Research Center

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 33175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20626]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 112

[Docket No. 93-167-2]


Viruses, Serums, and Toxins and Analogous Products; Master Labels

Correction

    In rule document 96-14772 beginning on page 29462 in the issue of 
Tuesday, June 11, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 112.5  [Corrected]

    On page 29464, in the third column, in Sec. 112.5(c)(2)(v), in the 
first line insert ``label'' after ``changing''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Christopher GRANDA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3702

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-143544-04]
          - RIN 1545-BD84

### Correction

In proposed rule document E8-19603 beginning on page 49965 in the issue of Monday, August 25, 2008, make the following correction:

§1.336-3

1. On page 49979, in the first column, in §1.336-3(d)(1), in the twenty-second line, “into account in an amount” should read “into account in amount”.

2. On the same pages, in the same column, in §1.336-3(d)(2), in the last line, “into account in an amount” should read “into account in amount”.

[FR Doc. Z8-19603 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION ) Misc. No. 08-0511 (PLF)

LITIGATION ) 

__________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the Updated Motion by Class Counsel for Award of

Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, filed on September 24, 2012. The defendant has filed a response,

and class counsel have filed a reply brief supported by several affidavits. In their filings, class

counsel have offered to provide more detailed information regarding the hours they have worked

both leading up to the Court’s final approval of the Settlement Agreement following the Fairness

Hearing and the implementation of that final order over the last fourteen months. Upon

consideration of the parties’ filings and the relevant case law, the Court sees no need to make

such a request of class counsel. In addition, after carefully reviewing the motions papers and the

relevant case law, the Court does not believe it would be assisted by an oral argument or other incourt proceedings with respect to the pending motion. The Court therefore will decide the

Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses based on the papers that have been filed. It

is the Court’s intention to issue a decision in January 2013. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: December 7, 2012 United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5202 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5202

To require the Department of Housing and Urban Development to fill all 
asset management positions located at non-core office locations of the 
         Office of Multifamily Housing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2016

 Ms. Maxine Waters of California (for herself, Ms. Bass, Mr. Becerra, 
 Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. Cardenas, Ms. Judy Chu of California, 
 Ms. Hahn, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Mr. Lowenthal, Mrs. Napolitano, 
Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. Schiff, Mr. 
  Sherman, and Mrs. Torres) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Department of Housing and Urban Development to fill all 
asset management positions located at non-core office locations of the 
         Office of Multifamily Housing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving HUD's Multifamily Field 
Offices Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVING ASSET MANAGEMENT POSITIONS IN NON-CORE OFFICES.

    (a) Prohibition on Relocation of Positions.--The Secretary of 
Housing and Urban Development may not relocate to any core office of 
the Office of Multifamily Housing of the Department, any asset 
management position (including any account executive, senior account 
executive, and troubled asset specialist position) that, as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act, is located at a non-core office of such 
Office.
    (b) Back-Filling of Positions.--Upon the occurrence of a vacancy in 
any asset management position at any non-core office (including any 
vacancy in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act), the 
Secretary may newly hire an employee to fill such position only at the 
same non-core office.
    (c) Definition of Core Office.--For purposes of this section, the 
term ``core office'' means, with respect to the Office of Multifamily 
Housing of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, a regional 
hub office that is located in Atlanta, Chicago, Fort Worth, New York 
City, or San Francisco.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums 
as may be necessary to cover costs of the Department of Housing and 
Urban Development of complying with section 2.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5309 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2016 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. 

HARPER, and Mr. PALAZZO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, Mississippi, 

as the ‘‘Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARMY FIRST LIEUTENANT DONALD C. CARWILE 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 401 McElroy Drive in Oxford, 

7 Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5309 IH

1 First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army First Lieuten7 ant Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Noel DOMINGUEZ and Barbara Cabrera, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.