alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(6)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper
Case 21-17109-AJC Doc 7 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-17109-AJC Doc 7 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-17109-AJC Doc 7 Filed 07/22/21 Page 3 of 3
Shawn MCNEIL v. Jason TROSCLAIR, et al.

NO. 2018-CA-0124

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

JUNE 20, 2018

John D. Sileo, Casey W. Moll, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN D. SILEO, LLC, 320 N. Carrollton Avenue, Suite 200, New Orleans, LA 70119, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT

Amy Groves Lowe, TAYLOR, PORTER, BROOKS & PHILLIPS, L.L.P., 450 Florida Street, 8th Floor, P.O. Box 2471, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-2471, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE

(Court composed of Judge Rosemary Ledet, Judge Paula A. Brown, Judge Tiffany G. Chase )

Judge Rosemary Ledet

This is a personal injury suit arising out of a collision between a Regional Transit Authority ("RTA") bus and a truck. Shawn McNeil, a seated passenger on the bus, commenced this suit against, among others, Jason Trosclair, the driver of the truck. Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment dismissing Ms. McNeil's claims against all the defendants with prejudice. From this judgment, Ms. McNeil appeals. For the reasons that follow, we remand this case to the trial court for completion of the record.

*916**INCOMPLETE RECORD**

When the record was lodged with this court, none of the exhibits Ms. McNeil introduced at trial were included in the record. On June 6, 2018, this court ordered that Ms. McNeil show cause why the pending appeal should not be remanded to the trial court for correction of the record pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 2161.1 In her response, Ms. McNeil acknowledged that her trial exhibits are not in the trial court record.

Complying with the mandate in La. C.C.P. art. 2161 that an appeal is not to be dismissed because of an incomplete record, we remand this case to the trial court for completion of the record.

**REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS**

1

La. C.C.P. art. 2161 provides, in pertinent part, that "[a]n appeal shall not be dismissed because the trial record is missing, incomplete or in error no matter who is responsible, and the court may remand the case either for retrial or for correction of the record."
EX PARTE Ulises CHAVEZ

1160568 (2160096)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Tracy

Galicia

8 4 6 4
6719 Boston Drive

Lantana FL 33462

Palm Beach
x



03/11/2022

03/11/2022
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 61585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-31118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 10

[CGD 94-055]
RIN 2115-AF23


Licensing and Manning for Officers of Towing Vessels

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-28409, beginning on page 55548, in the 
issue of Monday, October 27, 1997 make the following correction:


Sec. 10.466  [Corrected]

    On page 55560, in the third column, in Sec. 10.466(b)(3), ``the'' 
should read ``a limited''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06517

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

06517\06517_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06517\06517_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06517\06517_Completeness Checklist_.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06517\06517_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06517\06517_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\06517_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\06517_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\06517_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\06517_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\First review 06517 - many sections incomplete.rtf Technical Review Correspondence

06517\Supporting Documentation\06517_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\06517_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Copy of Gen Plant Flow Schematic EPA.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part A.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part B.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part D.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part H.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Part I.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 06517\Supporting Documentation\Questionnaire Instructions.pdf Plant submitted survey file

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 22-11124-BKC-AJC

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

AVA CELESTE BENJAMIN

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF CONTINUED CONFIRMATION HEARING

DEBTOR

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Confirmation Hearing has been continued to July 26, 2022

at 01:35 pm. The hearing will be conducted by video conference. For instructions, please refer to the 

General Procedures for Hearings By Video Conference on the Court’s website. To participate in the 

hearing, you must register for the video conference no later than 3:00 pm one business day before the 

date of the hearing. To participate, click on the following link or manually enter the following link in a 

browser: https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsdO6orj8tEykAkNLdQ8XQPhWjIJbyMzo

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Continued 

Confirmation Hearing was mailed to those parties listed below on this 30th day of June, 2022.

/s/ Nancy K. Neidich

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

_____________________________________

Case 22-11124-AJC Doc 58 Filed 06/30/22 Page 1 of 2
 NOTICE OF CONTINUED CONFIRMATION HEARING

CASE NO.: 22-11124-BKC-AJC

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

NANCY K. NEIDICH

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

DEBTOR

AVA CELESTE BENJAMIN

2246 NW 61ST STREET

MIAMI, FL 33142-7829

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

JOSE BLANCO, ESQUIRE

102 E 49TH ST

HIALEAH, FL 33013

JOSE BLANCO, ESQUIRE IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAIL A CONFORMED COPY OF THIS 

NOTICE TO ALL CREDITORS AND INTERESTED PARTIES IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT 

THEREOF.

Case 22-11124-AJC Doc 58 Filed 06/30/22 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1 Certification of theChief Executive Officer of Acology, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Curtis Fairbrother, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Acology, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2014;

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report.

Date:October 23, 2014

/s/Curtis Fairbrother	 

CurtisFairbrother

Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                    Form of Section 906 Certification

              CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   AND
                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mezzanine Investment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 (the "Report"), I, Eric C. Bronk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

/s/ Eric C. Bronk
Eric C. Bronk
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 13, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
American Honda Finance Corporation

Members of the Board:

We have examined management's assertion about American Honda Finance
Corporation's (the Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, as they relate to the servicing of
retail automobile loan contracts, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2002
included in the accompanying management's assertion. The minimum servicing
standards not considered by the Company to be applicable to the servicing of
retail automobile loans include procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section I - Custodial
Bank Accounts, procedures 1, 2, 3 and 4 of section III - Disbursements and
procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section V - Mortgage Loan Accounting. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, including
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with insurance
requirements applicable to the Company as of and for the year ended March 31,
2002. The Company was not in compliance with minimum servicing standards for
maintaining an errors and omissions policy effective during the year ended March
31, 2002.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the third
paragraph, American Honda Finance Corporation has complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2002.


/s/ KPMG LLP


September 25, 2003
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(6)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

Photography        April 25, 2021        Landsat 8 Collection 2 image of the Richat Structure

publication        January 1, 1996        Ida and Dactyl: Spectral reflectance and color variations

publication        January 1, 1994        Discovery of Grooves on Gaspra

Program        October 1, 2018        IAU - WGCCRE

Satellite imagery        April 19, 2019        Re-Entry

Topic        April 22, 2019        Collection Highlights

Program        November 9, 2018        Workshops

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Illustrations        August 26, 2012        Vesta Dawn Framing Camera

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Current page            4
DISMISS and Opinion F iled September 1, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00715-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.W.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-01-19817 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is appellant’s motion fo r extension of time to file her notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 20 , 2021 final order. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, an appellate court may grant a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal if, in part, the notice of appeal is filed within fifteen days of the deadline prescribed by rule 26.1. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. Because appellant timely filed a motion for new tr ial, the rule 26.1 d eadline was July 19, 2021, ninety days after the complained-o f order was signed, and the deadline under rule 26.3 was August 3, 2021. See id. 26.1(a), 26.3. Appellant did not file her notice of appeal, however, until August 20th.–2– In the extension motion, appellant acknowledges the July 19th deadline but asserts she did not receive notice of the final order until May 5th and therefore, the deadlines run from that date, not the date of the final order. Deadlines run from the date of notice, however, only if notice is received more than twenty days after the date of judgment. 1 See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 306a(4); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 4.2(a). Because notice here was received within fifteen days, the deadlines were not altered. Accordingly, because the notice of appeal was not filed by August 3rd, we deny the extension motion and dismiss the app eal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a); Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C. , 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.–Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional).

210715F.P05

1 In no event though, may the deadlines run more th an ninety days after the original judgment or appealable order was signed. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 306a(4); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.2(a). /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.W.S., A CHILD
No. 05-21-00715-CV On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-01-19817. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.
In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered September 1, 2021.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(14)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(42)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)new york(1)
              - south dakota(18)

## By Year

Podcasts        July 26, 2021        Eyes on Earth Episode 55 - Urban Heat Islands of New York
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Technique for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in West Virginia      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

A technique is presented to provide a method of estimating the magnitude of peak discharges of T-year frequencies for unregulated, virtually natural streams in West Virginia. Multiple regression techniques were used to develop the relation between peak discharges and drainage area. Data collected at 170 stream gaging sites were used in the analyses.

Analyses indicated that the best estimating equations could be derived by dividing the state into three regions, Regions 1 and 2 covering the Ohio River basin in West Virginia and Region 3 covering the Potomac River basin in West Virginia.

The method is applicable for drainage areas between 0.3 and 2,000 square miles. Graphs are provided to estimate the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year flood peaks for drainage areas between 1 and 1,000 square miles. Peak discharges for drainage areas less than 1 or greater than 1,000 square miles can be estimated using the appropriate equations provided on each graph. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - West Virginia

View All **
Case 21-18481-MAM Doc 3 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT G

Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 22-11755-RAM Doc 6-7 Filed 03/08/22 Page 4 of 4
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CONNIE JONES-GERALD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4244

[January 25, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-2014-CF001384-A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Brad R. Schlesinger, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 27598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80524]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD01-95-031]
RIN 2115-AA97


Safety Zone: Macy's 1995 Fourth of July Fireworks, East River, NY

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-11659 beginning on page 25189 in the 
issue of Thursday, May 11, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 165.T01-031  [Corrected]

    On page 25190, in the third column, in Sec. 165.T01-031(c)(3)(ii), 
in the sixth line, insert the following after ``between'':
``the Williamsburg Bridge and the charted position of Buoy 18 (LLNR 
27335). These vessels may enter the zone and proceed to this area 
between''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
RE: EGU MACT - preamble 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 12/16/2011 06:53 PM 

 Cc: 

 Bill Maxwell, Ron Evans 

 Hide Details 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

Here are additional comments on that same section, on top of what I sent 

at 6 pm. 

 

From: Higgins, Cortney 

Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:54 PM 

To: Bob Wayland (Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov) 

Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: EGU MACT - preamble 

 

Hi Bob, 

Those edits on that response to comments is attached – I think we also 

have a few comments on the employment section – those should be ready in 

15 minutes. In the meantime, this is one sentence a reviewer didn’t 

understand and hoped you could clarify: 

 

During sustained periods of excess unemployment, the opportunity cost of 

labor required by regulated sectors to bring their facilities into 

compliance with an environmental regulation may be lower than it would be 

during a period of full employment (particularly if regulated industries 

employ otherwise idled labor to design, fabricate, or install the 

pollution control equipment required under this final rule). 

 

Preamble_1216_Interagencycomments under EO 13563 v2.docx
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - american samoa(3)
              - california(2)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - (-)puerto rico(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        May 12, 2021        Puerto Rico study area and Hurricane María path and data