alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROGRES

S POLRE P I

. HEADIN G Date : 12/15/199 0 From : Stev e Hawthorn , OS C Regio n VII I T o : Steve n Luftwig , Directo r BR D — Subject : Midval e Sla g (NFL ) - Abandone d La b - Polrep r POLRE F 2 2 I I

. BACKGROUN D Sit e Ho : 7 1 D.O

. No : 5 7 Respons e Authority : CERCL A N P L Status : Propose d NP L Star t Date : 12/12/199 0 Approva l Status : Directo r Hazardou s Waste Managemen t Divisio n Statu s o f Actio n Memorandum : Bein g Drafte d III

. RESPONS E INFORMATIO N A

. Situatio n T h e Mldvftlc t Sla g NPL Site (proposed ) locate d approximatel

y '60 0 East , 770 0 South , Midval e Utah , consist s primaril y o f abou t tw o millio n tons o f sla g remainin g fro m a century' s wort h o f coppe r an d lea d smeltin g i n th e are a an d i s locate d Jus t nort h c f th e Sharo n Stee l NP L site

. Th e wante s foun d o n th e sit e ar e contaminate d i n par t wit h high concentration s

c f lea d an d arsenic

. A n analytica l laboratory was observe d o n th e sit e containin g hazardou s chemical s and a removal actio n wa s initiated

. Flammabl e liquids , oxidizers , acids , bases , cyanides , low-leve l radioactiv e compounds , compresse d gas cylinders , an d a suspecte d P C B transforme r hav e bee n foun d o n th e site

. Th e remova l actio n continue s throug h initia l mobilizatio n

activitie s an d furthe r detaiJ.e d sit e investigation

.

Initia l estimate s indicate d approximatel y 250 0 container s o f various size s o n site

. Two loca l televisio n station s covered activitie s a t th e sit e o n Frida y 12/14

. Col d an d eno w condition s continu e a t th e sit e causin g sligh t delays

.B

.

Action s Take n The chemica l inventor y an d stagin g wa s starte d i n th e La b building

. Hazar d categorizatio n

o f unknown chemical s wa s starte d in th e La b building

. Additiona l chemical s were ale o foun d in anothe r buildin g locate d near th e east gate

. Thi s buildin g ala o house d laboratorie s an d storag e area s fo r chemicals

. C

. Nex t Step s T h e prelioinar y assessmen t continues wit h th e segregation , inventory , an d stagin g o f th e La b buildin g contents

. Additiona l building s o n th e sit e wil l b e examine d fo r hazardou s chemicals

. D

. Key Issue s Non e t o repor t V

. COS T INFORMATIO N Amoun t Cost

s Budgete d t o Dat e Balanc e ERC S $ 75,00 0' 26,00 0

49,00 0 T A T 50,00 0

7,00 0 43,00 0 E P A 26,00 0

4,00 0 21,00 0 TOTA L 150,00 0 37,00 0 113,00 0
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT  

TO THE  
 ARRIS
INTERNATIONAL PLC AMENDED AND RESTATED  
 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN  

(As amended through January 4, 2016) 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made as of the 10th day of May, 2017, by ARRIS International plc, registered in England & Wales with company
number 09551763 (the “Company”), to be effective as set forth herein. 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the Company previously established the ARRIS International plc Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of ordinary
shares, 1 pence par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) available for issuance under the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended, as follows: 
 1. Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the present section in its
entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof: 
 3. STOCK SUBJECT OF THE PLAN. Subject to the
provisions of paragraph 10, the stock which may be sold pursuant to options under the Plan shall not exceed in the aggregate 10,800,000 shares of the authorized Common Stock of the Company, which is an increase of 4,000,000 shares from the
previously-authorized 6,800,000 shares, including shares of ARRIS Group, Inc. issued prior to January 4, 2016 (the “Shares”). The Shares may be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares reacquired by the Company and held in its
treasury. Options issued under the Plan will reduce the number of Shares available under the Plan by the number of Shares subject to the issued option. If unexercised options expire or terminate for any reason, in whole or in part, the number of
Shares subject to the unexercised portion of such options will be available again for issuance under the Plan. 
 2. This First
Amendment is subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company at a meeting duly called for such purposes. The increase in number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance may not be issued pursuant to the Plan unless and until such
amendment is approved by the shareholders within twelve (12) months after the date first written above, which was the date the Board of Directors of the Company approved this First Amendment. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in
full force and effect. 
 [signature page to follow] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this First Amendment as of the date first written
above. 
  

	
	COMPANY:
	
	ARRIS INTERNATIONAL PLC
	
	By: /s/ Patrick
Macken                                        
    
	Name: Patrick Macken
	Title: SVP, General Counsel & Secretary
Mr. Michael Quiello

Vice President Corporate Safety

United Airlines, Inc.

233 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Dear Mr. Quiello:

We have received your August 1, 2012, correspondence withdrawing your 

January 30, 2012, petition on behalf of United Airlines, Inc. from § 121.2941(b)(1) and 

(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0127). No further 

action will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

CONCURRENCES

ROUTING SYMBOL

ARM-101

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE

ROUTING SYMBOL

ARM-100

INITIALS/SIGNATURE

DATE
2

Project No.: AFS-12-208-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-101:KJones:8/8/2012:Doc#34640

ARM-1/100/101 AFS-200

MR MICHAEL QUIELLO

VICE PRESIDENT CORPORATE SAFETY

UNITED AIRLINES INC

233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE

CHICAGO IL 60606
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4903 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4903

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service to target 
citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under 
     the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TARGETING BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 
              BASED ON THE EXERCISE OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

    None of the funds made available under any Act may be used by the 
Internal Revenue Service to target citizens of the United States for 
exercising any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4903

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service to target 
citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under 
     the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
```
Duwayne JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000834

27-FEB-2020

08:58 AM
Exhibit 99.1****

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Woodworkers Warehouse, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended March 1, 2003 (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, WALTER S. SPOKOWSKI, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 30, 2003

 

    /s/    Walter S. Spokowski               

Walter S. Spokowski, 

President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1499

JUNE BRYANT-BUNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; WANDIE VINCENT, Sheriff; DETECTIVE REED; DEPUTY PARKER; JANE DOE, Deputy; MAGISTRATE SHEARN; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; LAWRENCE SOLOMON; NEAL VAUGHAN; C. A. COLEMAN, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT POWELL; OFFICER MASON; OFFICER PHILLIPS; OFFICER ARCHER, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-1765

JUNE BRYANT-BUNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; WANDIE VINCENT, Sheriff; DETECTIVE REED; DEPUTY PARKER; JANE DOE, Deputy; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; LAWRENCE SOLOMON; NEAL VAUGHAN; C. A. COLEMAN, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT POWELL; OFFICER MASON; OFFICER PHILLIPS; OFFICER ARCHER,- 2 - Defendants - Appellees,

and

MAGISTRATE SHEARN, Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City and Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00034-D)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
June Bryant-Bunch, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Vaughan, Woodland, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, June Bryant-Bunch appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellee Shearn’s motion to dismiss and granting the remaining Appellees’ motion to dismiss her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bryant-Bunch v. Northampton County Sheriff’s Dep’t , No. 2:05-cv-00034-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006 & June 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plastipak
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended November 2, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, William C. Young, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that based on my knowledge:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.



                                         /s/ William C. Young
                                    William C. Young
                                    Chief Executive Officer of
                                    Plastipak Holdings, Inc.
                                    January 31, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-23562]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 60609]]



The President

3 CFR


Proclamation 8296--To Modify Duty-free Treatment Under The 
Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act and for Other Purposes

Correction

    In Presidential document E8-23562 beginning on page 57475 in the 
issue of Friday, October 3, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 57483 the Filed date should read ``10-2-08''.

[FR Doc. Z8-23562 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Daniel CARRASQUILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Scale-dependent habitat selection and size-based dominance in adult male American alligators      

      September 2, 2016    

Habitat selection is an active behavioral process that may vary across spatial and temporal scales. Animals choose an area of primary utilization (i.e., home range) then make decisions focused on resource needs within patches. Dominance may affect the spatial distribution of conspecifics and concomitant habitat selection. Size-dependent social dominance hierarchies have been documented in captive alligators, but evidence is lacking from wild populations. We studied habitat selection for adult male American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis; n = 17) on the Pearl River in central Mississippi, USA, to test whether habitat selection was scale-dependent and individual resource selectivity was a function of conspecific body size. We used K-select analysis to quantify selection at the home range scale and patches within the home range to determine selection congruency and important habitat variables. In addition, we used linear models to determine if body size was related to selection patterns and strengths. Our results indicated habitat selection of adult male alligators was a scale-dependent process. Alligators demonstrated greater overall selection for habitat variables at the patch level and less at the home range level, suggesting resources may not be limited when selecting a home range for animals in our study area. Further, diurnal habitat selection patterns may depend on thermoregulatory needs. There was no relationship between resource selection or home range size and body size, suggesting size-dependent dominance hierarchies may not have influenced alligator resource selection or space use in our sample. Though apparent habitat suitability and low alligator density did not manifest in an observed dominance hierarchy, we hypothesize that a change in either could increase intraspecific interactions, facilitating a dominance hierarchy. Due to the broad and diverse ecological roles of alligators, understanding the factors that influence their social dominance and space use can provide great insight into their functional role in the ecosystem.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Francisco  Vilella, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

## Related Content

####             Francisco  Vilella, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pearl River
                  -  Ross Barnett Reservoir
                  - mississippi

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - new york(1)
              - south dakota(18)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 23, 2020        Eyes on Earth Episode 20 - Mapping Alaska's Permafrost
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4935 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4935

   To amend title 37, United States Code, to require compliance with 
domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members 
  of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2016

  Ms. Tsongas (for herself, Mr. Poliquin, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Jones, Mr. 
  Huizenga of Michigan, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, and Mr. Moulton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 37, United States Code, to require compliance with 
domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members 
  of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stepping up for American Workers and 
Troops Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH DOMESTIC SOURCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FOOTWEAR 
              FURNISHED TO ENLISTED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES UPON 
              THEIR INITIAL ENTRY INTO THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 418 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) In the case of athletic footwear needed by members of the 
Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their initial entry into 
the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such footwear 
directly to the members instead of providing a cash allowance to the 
members for the purchase of such footwear.
    ``(2) In procuring athletic footwear to comply with paragraph (1), 
the Secretary of Defense shall comply with the requirements of section 
2533a of title 10, without regard to the applicability of any 
simplified acquisition threshold under chapter 137 of title 10 (or any 
other provision of law).
    ``(3) This subsection does not prohibit the provision of a cash 
allowance to a member described in paragraph (1) for the purchase of 
athletic footwear if such footwear--
            ``(A) is medically required to meet unique physiological 
        needs of the member; and
            ``(B) cannot be met with athletic footwear that complies 
        with the requirements of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. IGNAC IO VALDIVIA-M AR QUEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-50091

D.C . No. 2:13-c r-00651-PA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Pe rc y Ande rson, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Igna c io Va ldivia -M arque z a p pe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the 70-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for posse s sion with inte

nt to distribute

m arijua na on boa rd a ve s se l subje c t to Unite d Stat e s jurisdic t ion a

nd a iding a

n d a be tting, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 2; 21 U.S.C .



# FIL ED N OV 23 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).§ 960(b)(2)(G); a n d 46 U.S.C . § 70503(a)(1). W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

nd we a ffirm . Va ldivia -M a

rque z c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by foc u sing on gene ra l de t e rre nc e to thee xc lusion of the othe r 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) fa c t ors a n d fa iling to c onside r and e xpla in its re j e c tion of his m

itiga ting a rgum e nts. W e re vie wfor pla in e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Vale n c ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a

nd find none . The re c ord re fle c ts tha t the c ourt prope rly c onside re d the se c tion 3553(a ) fa c tors a nd Va ldivia -M arque z ’ s m itiga ting argum e nts, a

nd suffic ie ntly

e xpla ine d

the se nte nc e . Se eUnite d State s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba nc ). Va ldivia -M a

rque z ne xt c onte n ds tha

t the a lle ge d proc e dura l e rrors re s ulte d in a substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble se nte nc e . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in im

posing Valdivia -M arque z ’ s se nte nc e . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The be low-Guide line s se nte n c e is substa ntive l y re a s ona ble in light of the

se c tion 3553(a

) se nte nc ing fa c t ors a

nd the tota lity

of the c irc um s ta nc e s . Se eGall , 552 U.S. a t 51; Unite d State

s v . Gutie rre

z -Sanc he z , 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th C ir. 2009) (“ The we i ght to be give n the va rious fa c tors in a pa rtic u la r c a se is for thedisc re tion of thedistric t c ourt.” ). All pe nding m otions a

re de nie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 5 0 0 9 1 2