alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(10)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - (-)arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(4)
              - hawaii(5)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 31, 2017        Historic Context of the Continuous Slope Area Method

Featured Films and Shorts        June 8, 2022        Re-greening a Dryland Watershed
ex10112010eicpsecondamen







 1 EXHIBIT 10.11 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN (2010 RESTATEMENT)   This Second Amendment to the 2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (2010 Restatement) (the “2010 EICP”) was approved by the Board of Directors of Federal Signal Corporation on July 24, 2017.    WHEREAS, Federal Signal Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the 2010 EICP;   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) now deems it desirable to amend the 2010 EICP in certain respects; and   WHEREAS, this Second Amendment of the 2010 EICP shall supersede and amend the provision of the 2010 EICP set forth below in its entirety.    NOW THEREFORE, by virtue and in the exercise of the powers reserved to the Board, under Section 16 of the 2010 EICP, the 2010 EICP is hereby amended in the following respects:   1. Section 14 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:   14. Taxes   The Company shall be entitled to withhold taxes in compliance with applicable tax withholding requirements, if any, with respect to any amounts payable or shares deliverable under this 2010 Plan after giving the person entitled to receive such payment or delivery notice as far in advance as practicable, and the Company may defer making payment or delivery as to any benefit if any such tax is payable until indemnified to its satisfaction. In the sole discretion of the Administrator, the person entitled to any such delivery may, by notice to the Company at the time the requirement for such delivery is first established, elect to have such withholding satisfied by a reduction of the number of shares otherwise so deliverable, such reduction to be calculated based on a closing market price on the date of such notice. In no event shall the amount of such tax withholding exceed the maximum statutory tax rates (or such other rate as would not trigger a negative accounting impact), as determined by the Company in its sole discretion * * * Except as modified by this First Amendment, all terms and provisions of the 2010 EICP shall remain in full force and effect.
Dennis COX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3097

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - (-)products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Data Release        February 5, 2024        Geochemistry and High-Resolution Backscattered Electron Imaging of Meteor Crater Impact Melts

Data Release        February 17, 2023        Meteor Crater, Northern Arizona: Drill Hole Sample Collection, 1970-1973, and Curation, 2010-2013

Data Release        February 8, 2023        A Lithostratigraphic Analysis of the Meteor Crater Ejecta Blanket: Measurements, Assigned Facies, and Unit Thickness
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Spatial and temporal variation in sources of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Rocky Mountains using nitrogen isotopes      

      March 20, 2018    

Variation in source areas and source types of atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition to high-elevation ecosystems in the Rocky Mountains were evaluated using spatially and temporally distributed N isotope data from atmospheric deposition networks for 1995-2016. This unique dataset links N in wet deposition and snowpack to mobile and stationary emissions sources, and enhances understanding of the impacts of anthropogenic activities and environmental policies that mitigate effects of accelerated N cycling across the Rocky Mountain region. δ15N−NO3− at 50 U.S. Geological Survey Rocky Mountain Snowpack (Snowpack) sites ranged from −3.3‰ to +6.5‰, with a mean value of +1.4‰. At 15 National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP)/National Trends Network wet deposition (NADP Wetfall) sites, summer δ15N−NO3− is significantly lower ranging from −7.6‰ to −1.3‰ while winter δ15N−NO3− ranges from −2.6‰ to +5.5‰, with a mean value of +0.7‰ during the cool season. The strong seasonal difference in NADP Wetfall δ15N−NO3− is due in part to variation in the proportion of N originating from source regions at different times of the year due to seasonal changes in weather patterns. Snowpack NO3− and δ15N−NO3− are significantly related to NADP Wetfall (fall and winter) suggesting that bulk snowpack samples provide a reliable estimate at high elevations. Spatial trends show higher NO3−concentrations and δ15N−NO3− in the Southern Rocky Mountains located near larger anthropogenic N emission sources compared to the Northern Rocky Mountains. NADP Wetfall δ15N−NH4+ ranged from −10‰ to 0‰, with no observed spatial pattern. However, the lowest δ15N−NH4+(−9‰), and the highest NH4+ concentration (35 μeq/L) were observed at a Utah site dominated by local agricultural activities, whereas the higher δ15N−NH4+observed in Colorado and Wyoming are likely due to mixed sources, including fossil fuel combustion and agricultural sources. These findings show spatial and seasonal variation in N isotope data that reflect differences in sources of anthropogenic N deposition to high-elevation ecosystems and have important implications for environmental policy across the Rocky Mountain region.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

## Related Content

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

### Contact

####               Colorado Water Science Center - Main Office          

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center, Building 53, MS-415Lakewood, CO80225United States

(303) 236-6900

(303) 236-4912

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Rocky Mountains

View All **
Zulaime GONZALEZ and Rafael Gonzalez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEMS, LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 8.1

Subsidiaries of United Biscuits Finance plc

|Subsidiary                         |  | Geographic Location |  | Ownership
Interest
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------
|Regentrealm Limited                |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|Finalrealm Limited                 |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|United Biscuits (Holdings) Limited |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|McVitie & Price Limited            |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|United Biscuits (UK) Limited       |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|UB Investments plc                 |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|UB Overseas Limited                |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|UB Group Limited                   |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|UB Foods US Limited                |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|Ross Young's Holdings Limited      |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|The Jacob's Bakery Limited(1)      |  | United Kingdom      |  | 100%              
|United Biscuits France SAS         |  | France              |  | 100%              
|United Biscuits Industrie SAS      |  | France              |  | 100%              
|UB Investments (Netherlands) B.V   |  | The Netherlands     |  | 100%              
|Koninklijke Verkade NV             |  | The Netherlands     |  | 100%              
|NV Biscuits Delacre SA             |  | Belgium             |  | 100%              
|United Biscuits Iberia, S.L.       |  | Spain               |  | 100%              
|Galletas United Biscuits S.A.      |  | Spain               |  | 100%              
|Carnes y Conservas Espanolas S.A.  |  | Spain               |  | 100%              
|United Biscuits Portugal S.A.(2)   |  | Portugal            |  | 100%              

---

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Surinder Rametra, Treasurer of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc.
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Goldeneye Capital Group, Inc. for the
period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldeneye Capital
Group, Inc.


Dated: May 18, 2005


/s/ Surinder Rametra
--------------------
Surinder Rametra
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Transport of biologically important nutrients by wind in an eroding cold desert      

      August 1, 2012    

Wind erosion following fire is an important landscape process that can result in the redistribution of ecologically important soil resources. In this study we evaluated the potential for a fire patch in a desert shrubland to serve as a source of biologically important nutrients to the adjacent, downwind, unburned ecosystem. We analyzed nutrient concentrations (P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, Al) in wind-transported sediments, and soils from burned and adjacent unburned surfaces, collected during the first to second growing seasons after a wildfire that burned in 2007 in Idaho, USA in sagebrush steppe; a type of cold desert shrubland. We also evaluated the timing of potential wind erosion events and weather conditions that might have contributed to nutrient availability in downwind shrubland. Findings indicated that post-fire wind erosion resulted in an important, but transient, addition of nutrients on the downwind shrubland. Aeolian sediments from the burned area were enriched relative to both the up- and down-wind soil and indicated the potential for a fertilization effect through the deposition of the nutrient-enriched sediment during the first, but not second, summer after wildfire. Weather conditions that could have produced nutrient transport events might have provided increased soil moisture necessary to make nutrients accessible for plants in the desert environment. Wind transport of nutrients following fire is likely important in the sagebrush steppe as it could contribute to pulses of resource availability that might, for example, affect plant species differently depending on their phenology, and nutrient- and water-use requirements.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho

View All **
Reco Alexander FERBA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 14, 2003
SHAWN BOYER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1368

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

J. Scott Duncan, Judge.

Shawn Boyer, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Case 21-18725-RAM Doc 2 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-18725-RAM Doc 2 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 5
AIR AND RADIATION DIVISION
77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: January 21, 2015 AR-18J

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Representatives of Earthjustice, the Environmental Law and Policy Center and Sierra Club Regarding the September 3, 2014, Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submission Requesting a Revision to the Regional Haze SIP for Illinois Power Holdings (IPH), and AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen (Medina Valley)

FROM: Kathleen D’Agostino Air Planning and Maintenance Section

TO: Files

On January 12, 2015, Doug Aburano, Sarah Arra, Kathleen D’Agostino, Christine Liszewski, John Summerhays, and Eric Svingen of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) met with Andrew Armstrong of the Environmental Law and Policy Center, Tom Cmar of Earthjustice, and Kristin Henry of Sierra Cl ub. The group provided the attached comments and articulated their concerns regarding the Illinoi s Regional Haze SIP revision for IPH and Medina Valley.

EPA indicated that the SIP submission wa s under review and offered to notify Mr. Armstrong when a proposal would be published in the Federal Register.

Attachment
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - (-)missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1963        Preliminary report on seismic-reflection studies of crustal structure in the western, central, and southern United States

publication        December 1, 2015        Conservation genomics reveals multiple evolutionary units within Bell’s Vireo (*Vireo bellii*).

publication        January 1, 1992        Application of structural geology to mineral and energy resources of the Central and Western United States

publication        January 1, 2012        The occurrence of trace elements in bed sediment collected from areas of varying land use and potential effects on stream macroinvertebrates in the conterminous western United States, Alaska, and Hawaii, 1992-2000

publication        June 25, 2021        Evaluating establishment of conservation practices in the Conservation Reserve Program across the central and western United States

publication        January 1, 1999        Biogeographical profiles of shorebird migration in midcontinental North America

National News Release        December 4, 2014        Get Your Wheels Spinning

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
KVA 50% L d T t l L

Wes Patterson, DOE Negotiating Committee, 04 Nov 2011

KVA vs 50%

Loa

d

T

o

t

al Loss

MVLF

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 1
Scratch Sheets
MVLF-1ph ALL designs (including out-of-sc

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ... 2 ...3 ...

Unrestricted losses

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 3
MVLF-3ph ALL designs (including out-of-sc

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ... 2 ...3 ...

Unrestricted losses

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 4

-50%
Reference Data
MVLF ALL designs (including out-of-scope) 

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

2

Average Trend 

before 2010 STD

3⁄4 rule

2010 STD 1ph

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 6
MVLF ALL designs (including out-of-scope) 

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 The current 

standard represents a loss reduction of- 45% for small KVA

- 35% for large KVA 35% for large KVA

2 ... 3 ...4 Large 1ph ... 45%

For same KVA rating

-45%

2010 STD 1ph

For same KVA ratingthe 1ph loss is equalto 0.75 x 3ph 

Large 1ph

-35%

Small 1ph

-45% Small 3ph

-45%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 7
MVLF ALL designs – DOE KVA scope 

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 8
MVLF ALL designs – ABB-GO and OPS-SA 

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 9
MVLF ALL designs – ABB-M3 and OPS-M3

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 10
MVLF ALL designs – ABB-M3 and OPS-M3 

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 11
MVLF ALL designs – Pads

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 12
MVLF ALL designs – Poles

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3 ...

4 ...

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 13
MVLF ALL designs – Networks

KVA (x-axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y axis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (y-axis

1 ...2 ... 3

STD

...

4 ...

-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%

© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 14
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      10, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Salvatore R. DeFrancesco,      Jr.          |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |  Salvatore      R. DeFrancesco, Jr.,       |
|                               |   |  Treasurer      and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
Randal Jose BRACETTY-ATANACIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Akil Z. FLAGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.