alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<CIK>                             0001097945
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            11,092
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  11,092
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    11,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,650
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                           2,775
<OTHER-SE>                         6,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      11,092
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   2,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (27)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                      (2,188)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      (2,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .00


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4987 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3957 2nd Avenue in Laurel Hill, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

William ‘Kelly’ Lacey Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2016 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself, Ms. GRAHAM, Mr. YOHO, Mr. CRENSHAW, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. MICA, Mr. POSEY, 

Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. BILIRAKIS, 

Mr. JOLLY, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. ROSS, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. 

ROONEY of Florida, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. CLAWSON of Florida, 

Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. CURBELO of 

Florida, and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3957 2nd Avenue in Laurel Hill, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William ‘Kelly’ Lacey Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4987 IH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM ‘‘KELLY’’ 

2 LACEY POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 3957 2nd Avenue in Laurel Hill, 

5 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 First Class William ‘Kelly’ Lacey Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in section 1 shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Wil11 liam ‘Kelly’ Lacey Post Office’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Maria LOPEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0397

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: KISMA WILLIAMS REEFE

aka KISHMA VONETTA REEFE, Chapter 7

Bankr. No. 21-13961-PDR

Debtor.

__________________________________________/

NATIONWIDE JUDGMENT RECOVERY, INC., Judge Peter D. Russin

Plaintiff, Adversary No. 21-01246-PDR

v.

KISMA WILLIAMS REEFE

aka KISHMA VONETTA REEFE

aka KISHMA REEFE

aka WQ,

Defendant.

/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This cause came on to be heard before the court on November 3, 2021 on the Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss. The court reviewed the Complaint, the Motion to Dismiss, the Response to 

the Motion to Dismiss and the Plaintiff’s Reply. The Court having heard argument of counsel, it 

is

ORDERED:

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 9, 2021.

Case 21-01246-PDR Doc 17 Filed 11/09/21 Page 1 of 2
1. The Motion to Dismiss is Granted in part. The Complaint is dismissed, without 

prejudice. 

2. The Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within fifteen (15) days from the 

date of this Order.

3. The Defendant may file a Response to an Amended Complaint filed by the 

Plaintiff within fifteen (15) days from the service date of an Amended Complaint.

// // //

Submitted by:

Martin L. Sandler, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

3390 Mary Street, Suite 116

Miami, FL 33133

T: 305-379-6655

E: Martin@sandler-sandler.com

Attorney Sandler is directed to serve as copy of this order upon counsel for the defendant upon 

receipt of this order.

Case 21-01246-PDR Doc 17 Filed 11/09/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Significance of exchanging SSURGO and STATSGO data when modeling hydrology in diverse physiographic terranes      

      April 1, 2013    

The Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) is a TOPMODEL-based hydrologic model that depends on spatially accurate soils data to function in diverse terranes. In Kentucky, this includes mountainous regions, karstic plateau, and alluvial plains. Soils data are critical because they quantify the space to store water, as well as how water moves through the soil to the stream during storm events. We compared how the model performs using two different sources of soils data--Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) and State Soil Geographic Database laboratory data (STATSGO)--for 21 basins ranging in size from 17 to 1564 km2. Model results were consistently better when SSURGO data were used, likely due to the higher field capacity, porosity, and available-water holding capacity, which cause the model to store more soil-water in the landscape and improve streamflow estimates for both low- and high-flow conditions. In addition, there were significant differences in the conductivity multiplier and scaling parameter values that describe how water moves vertically and laterally, respectively, as quantified by TOPMODEL. We also evaluated whether partitioning areas that drain to streams via sinkholes in karstic basins as separate hydrologic modeling units (HMUs) improved model performance. There were significant differences between HMUs in properties that control soil-water storage in the model, although the effect of partitioning these HMUs on streamflow simulation was inconclusive.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Kentucky

View All **
EXHIBIT 31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, John R. Signorello, certify that:  1.         I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007;  2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.         The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)        disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  5.         The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 13, 2007  By:/s/ John R. Signorello John R. Signorello Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Managing effects of drought and other water resource challenges in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest      

      December 31, 2019    

This is a Cooperator Report. As such, there is no specific abstract.

The physical, ecological, and social environments of Alaska and the Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of the United States are extremely diverse. Alaska ranges from the Arctic Ocean and the very cold, dry environments of the North Slope to the cool and very rainy coastal North Pacific region of Southeast Alaska. Most precipitation falls as snow at higher elevations. In Arctic Alaska, average annual temperature is 14.6 F, and average annual precipitation is 11 inches. By contrast, in Southeast Alaska, average annual temperature is 35.8 F, and annual average precipitation is 143 inches.

The PNW, defined here as Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, ranges from the Pacific Coast (annual precipitation of 200 inches) to interior semi-arid regions (annual precipitation of 8 inches). Precipitation patterns in the PNW are strongly governed by orographic phenomena, with high, persistent snowpack in the higher mountains (e.g., record annual snowfall of 1,130 in at Mount Baker, Washington in 1999-2000). 

Ecosystems in the PNW include productive temperate coniferous forests near the Pacific coast and along the (wet) west slope of the Cascade Range, less productive mixed-conifer forest along the (dry) east slope of the Cascades and in interior mountain ranges, and sagebrush-steppe and shrublands at lower elevations in much of the interior and mountain valleys. Large rivers and thousands of smaller tributaries form an extensive network of riparian, wetland, and estuarine systems that provide both critical hydrologic function and biological diversity at broad and fine spatial scales.

Although Alaska and the Pacific Northwest differ in important physical, ecological, and social features, the importance of natural resources is evident in both regions. Water is important for wildlife and people. Water provides critical habitat for salmon, which are culturally and economically valuable species. Timber production has declined in recent decades. Recreation has emerged as a major revenue source.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeremy Littell, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Alaska CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

jlittell@usgs.gov

907-360-9416

## Related Content

#### Jeremy Littell, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Alaska CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

jlittell@usgs.gov

907-360-9416

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### Jeremy Littell, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Alaska CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

jlittell@usgs.gov

907-360-9416

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Washington

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8763]
RIN 1545-AU06


Modifications of Bad Debts and Dealer Assignments of Notional 
Principal Contracts

Correction

    In rule document 98-2093 beginning on page 4394 in the issue of 
Thursday, January 29, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 4395, in the first column, in the DATES section, in the 
second line, ``February 29, 1998'' should read ``January 29, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Alejandro APARICIO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Valerie GREENBERG, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of IceWEB, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John R. Signorello, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      October 15, 2010
              
              /s/John R. SignorelloJohn
      R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive
      officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.    Consent of Experts and Counsel




Beckstead and Watts, LLP
Certified Public Accountants



                                     3340 Wynn Road, Suite B
                                         Las Vegas, NV 89102
                                                702.257.1984
                                          702.362.0540 (fax)



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have issued our report dated March 17, 2003, accompanying
the financial statements of Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc.
on  Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 and for
the  period  of  June  21,  2001  (inception  date)  through
December  31,  2002.  We hereby consent to the incorporation
by  reference of said report on the Annual Report of Medical
Staffing Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-KSB.

Signed,

/s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP
-----------------------------
March 17, 2003
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

40788

Vol. 63, No. 146

Thursday, July 30, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

ARMS Initiative Implementation

Correction

In notice document 98–19918

appearing on page 40108 in the issue of

Monday, July 27, 1998, make the

following corrections:

1. In the first column, PLACE OF

MEETING:, second line,‘‘Law’’ should

read ‘‘Las’’.

2. In the first column, TIME OF

MEETING:, second line, ‘‘August 13’’

should read ‘‘August 12’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 0

[AG Order No. 2167–98]

Office of the Inspector General

Correction

In rule document 98–17770,

beginning on page 36846, in the issue of

Wednesday, July 8, 1998, make the

following correction.

§ 0.29e [Corrected]

On page 36848, in the first column, in

§ 0.29e(a)(1), in the sixth line, ‘‘of

administrative misconduct on the part

of an employee’’ should be added after

‘‘allegation’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Matthew PAGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, INC., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Kenneth HENDEL, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0678

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Request Form

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cuttings Sampling Protocol

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

      ( print page 1937)    

### Correction

In notice document E4-3911 beginning on page 74 in the issue of Monday, January 3, 2005 make the following correction:

On page 74, in the table, under the “Period” heading, in the ninth entry “2/31/04” should read “12/31/04 ”.

[FR Doc. Z4-3911 Filed 1-10-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Roy COURAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2766

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130979 & (47)(48) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130979 COA: 258071 Oakland CC: 2004-196241-FC DUANE ALLEN MILLS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion to a dd issue is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the ques tions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Th e motion to remand is DENIED.

d0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

71877

Vol. 69, No. 237

Friday, December 10, 2004

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request

Correction 

In notice document E4–3475 

beginning on page 70662 in the issue of 

Tuesday, December 7, 2004, make the 

following correction: 

On page 70662, in the third column, 

in the DATES section, in the third line, 

‘‘2004’’ should read ‘‘2005’’.

[FR Doc. Z4–3475 Filed 12–9–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D