alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ACE-24]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Lincoln, NE

Correction

    In rule document 98-1104 beginning on page 2600, in the issue of 
Friday, January 16, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 2601, in the first column, in Sec. 71.1, under ACE NE E5, 
Lincoln, NE [Revised], in the first paragraph, in the seventh line, 
``each'' should read ``east''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: 2011 japan earthquake and tsunami

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(4)

## By Year

Photography        May 1, 2011        Wreckage after the Japan earthquake and tsunami in 2011

Photography        May 6, 2011        Tsunami damage in Natori, Japan

Podcasts        March 10, 2011        Magnitude 8.9 Near the East Coast of Japan

Featured Films and Shorts        October 10, 2019        Image of the Week - Sea Walls of Japan

Presentations and Events        February 29, 2024        PubTalk-02/2024: Using Communication Science to Communicate USGS Science

Photography        March 19, 2011        Ishinomaki - Before and After

Research        March 18, 2019        Preliminary simulations of the 2011 Japan tsunami

Photography        March 20, 2011        Ishinomaki - Before and After

publication        November 8, 2012        Tohoku-Oki Earthquake Tsunami Runup and Inundation Data for Sites Around the Island of Hawaiʻi

Featured Story        March 20, 2017        Preparing for Tsunami Hazards on Washington’s Pacific Coast

Topic        January 9, 2017        Preparing for Tsunami Hazards on Washington’s Pacific Coast

Center News        January 9, 2017        Preparing for Tsunami Hazards on Washington’s Pacific Coast

Photography        April 23, 2019        Sea Walls of Japan

publication        May 1, 2012        Tsunami hazards to U.S. coasts from giant earthquakes in Alaska

publication        March 26, 2014        The 1946 Unimak Tsunami Earthquake Area: revised tectonic structure in reprocessed seismic images and a suspect near field tsunami source

Center News        April 7, 2011        Volcano Watch — Be akamai—when in doubt, head mauka

Presentations and Events        July 30, 2015        PubTalk 7/2015 — The Giant Cascadia Earthquake of January 26, 1700

publication        September 4, 2013        The SAFRR tsunami scenario: improving resilience for California

Presentations and Events        January 26, 2017        PubTalk 1/2017 — Unusual sources of tsunamis

publication        September 10, 2014        The Pedestrian Evacuation Analyst: geographic information systems software for modeling hazard evacuation potential

Center News        June 3, 2011        International Team Studies Tsunami Deposits in Japan to Improve Understanding and Mitigation of Tsunami Hazards

Photography        March 11, 2011        Japan tsunami of 2011 hits Santa Cruz yacht harbor

publication        January 1, 2011        88 hours: The U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center response to the March 11, 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer  fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

August 11, 2005
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 9 (Monday, January 14, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-25297]



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 9 / Monday, January 14, 2008 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 2303]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


2006 Nonforeign Area Cost-of-Living Allowance Survey Report: 
Alaska and Washington, DC, Areas

Correction

    In notice document E7-25297 beginning on page 774 in the issue of 
Thursday, January 3, 2008 make the following correction:
    On page 805, in Appendix 7, under the heading ``PEG index'', in the 
17th line, ``102.07'' should be moved to the 17th line under the 
heading ``MEG index''.

[FR Doc. Z7-25297 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Bernardo GOENAGA, d/b/a Westchester Point Plaza, Appellant, v. Anastasio CASTIELLO, Appellee.

No. 3D17-910

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Jacov
      Vaisman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      Advanced Medical Institute Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.




I,
      Dilip
      Shrestha, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of
      Advanced Medical Institute Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.






February
                  14, 2008By:
              /s/
                  Jacov VaismanJacov
                  VaismanChief
                  Executive OfficerBy:
              /s/
                  Dilip ShresthaDilip
                  ShresthaChief
                  Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         386
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               386
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       49,603
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     5,175
<OTHER-SE>                                                  54,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   386
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 0
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            13,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.003)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

__________________________________ 

 ) 

In re: ) CASE NO. 21-21661-RAM 

 ) CHAPTER 13 

VANESSA CRUZ CHIN, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Debtor. ) 

 ) 

ORDER SETTING FURTHER 

HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

The Court conducted a hearing on July 12, 2022, on a Motion 

for Reconsideration filed by South Broward Hospital District d/b/a 

Memorial Healthcare System (“Memorial Healthcare”) [DE# 62]. As 

announced at the hearing, the Court finds it appropriate to set a 

further hearing and to impose filing deadlines. It is - 

ORDERED as follows: 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on July 13, 2022.

Case 21-21661-RAM Doc 76 Filed 07/14/22 Page 1 of 3
2 

1. The Court will conduct a further hearing on the Motion 

for Reconsideration on August 25, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. The hearing 

will be conducted by video conference using the services of Zoom 

Video Communications, Inc. 

2. For instructions regarding the video conference, please 

refer to the General Procedures for Hearings By Video Conference on 

Judge Mark’s web page on the Court’s website, 

https://www.flsb.uscourts.gov/judges/judge-robert-mark

3. To register for the video conference, click on the 

following link or manually enter the following link in a browser: 

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsduqrrTIsGwLENmZWZhscEHry3et9jXQ

4. By August 2, 2022, the Debtor shall file a response to the 

Motion for Reconsideration addressing both the notice issues and the 

sovereign immunity argument. 

5. If Memorial Healthcare wishes to file a reply in support 

of the Motion for Reconsideration, the reply must be filed by 

August 19, 2022. 

6. The Court urges the parties to discuss settlement of this 

contested matter before both sides incur what may be significant 

legal fees addressing the factual and legal issues raised in the 

Motion for Reconsideration. 

### 

Case 21-21661-RAM Doc 76 Filed 07/14/22 Page 2 of 3
3

COPIES TO:

Jose A. Blanco, Esq.

Frank P. Rainer, Esq.

Nancy K. Neidich, Trustee

Case 21-21661-RAM Doc 76 Filed 07/14/22 Page 3 of 3
Steven A. MCLEOD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-5137

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# L_2005021EN.01000801.xml

| 25.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 21/8

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 11 January 2005

appointing the European Ombudsman

(2005/46/EC, Euratom)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 21, second paragraph, and 195 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 107d thereof,

Having regard to its decision of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (1), as amended by its decision of 14 March 2002 (2),

Having regard to Rule 194 of its Rules of Procedure,

Having regard to the call for applications (3),

Having regard to its vote of 11 January 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Mr Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS has been appointed European Ombudsman.

Done at Strasbourg, 11 January 2005.

For the European Parliament

The President

Josep BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 92, 9.4.2002, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 213, 25.8.2004, p. 9.

3

---
Michael F. THOMAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_publications(5)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - (-)michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

publication        November 6, 2017        Origins of lead in populations of raptors

publication        May 5, 2016        Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture

publication        February 12, 2021        Patterns and processes of pathogen exposure in gray wolves across North America

publication        September 26, 2013        Design tradeoffs for trend assessment in aquatic biological monitoring programs

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5063 

To limit donations made pursuant to settlement agreements to which the 

United States is a party, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2016 

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. MARINO, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. ISSA, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. LABRADOR, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California, Mr. BUCK, Mr. RATCLIFFE, Mr. TROTT, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, 

and Mr. DUFFY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To limit donations made pursuant to settlement agreements 

to which the United States is a party, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Settlement Slush 

5 Funds Act of 2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5063 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON DONATIONS MADE PURSUANT TO 

2 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS TO WHICH THE 

3 UNITED STATES IS A PARTY. 

4 (a) LIMITATION ON REQUIRED DONATIONS.—An of5 ficial or agent of the Government may not enter into a 

6 settlement agreement on behalf of the United States, or 

7 enforce such a settlement agreement, if that agreement 

8 includes a term requiring that any donation be made to 

9 any person by any party (other than the United States) 

10 to such agreement. 

11 (b) PENALTY.—Any official or agent of the Govern12 ment who violates subsection (a), shall be subject to the 

13 same penalties that would apply in the case of a violation 

14 of section 3302 of title 31, United States Code. 

15 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

16 (1) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.—The term 

17 ‘‘settlement agreement’’ means a settlement agree18 ment resolving a civil action or potential civil action. 

19 (2) DONATION.—The term ‘‘donation’’ does not 

20 include any payment by a party to provide restitu21 tion for or otherwise remedy the actual harm (in22 cluding to the environment), directly and proxi23 mately caused by the alleged conduct of the party, 

24 that is the basis for the settlement agreement. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 226 (Tuesday, November 24, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11124]



[[Page 64869]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 64-71


Title 40 CFR Parts 64-71; Republication

CFR Correction

    Title 40 CFR parts 64 to 71, revised as of July 1, 1998, is being 
republished in its entirety. The earlier issuance inadvertently omitted 
the last two lines of text from Sec. 70.5 (c)(1) through the first five 
lines of (c)(8)(iii)(B). The omitted text should replace the text on 
page 98.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EX-10.1.47



 Exhibit 10.1.47 

Amendment #1 
 To
Statement of Work #1 
 To the 2Ku In-Flight Connectivity Services Agreement 

Between 
 Delta Air Lines,
Inc. and Gogo LLC 
 Dated November 14th, 2016 

Amendment #1 Effective Date: April 3rd, 2017 

This is Amendment #1 (this “Amendment”), dated as of the Amendment #1 Effective Date, to Statement of Work #1 (“SOW”) dated as of
November 14th, 2016, is entered into by and between Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”), and Gogo LLC (“Contractor”). 

WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Delta and
Contractor are parties to the Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, Delta and Contractor desire to amend the Agreement as set forth within. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, Delta and Contractor hereby amend the SOW as follows: 

1) Change to preamble. The SOW preamble shall be deemed revised as follows: 

“This Statement of Work #1 (the “Statement of Work”) is entered into as of the date set forth above (the “Effective
Date”), and is pursuant to the 2Ku In-Flight Connectivity Services Agreement between Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) and Gogo LLC (“Contractor”) dated April 1, 2015 (as amended,
the “Agreement”), where the Statement of Work is subject to and incorporates by reference the provisions of the Agreement. Capitalized terms used without definition in this Statement of Work have the meanings assigned to them in the
Agreement. To the extent there is any contradiction, inconsistency or ambiguity between the terms of this Statement of Work and the Agreement, this Statement of Work will govern.” 

2) Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. This Amendment shall prevail over any conflicting terms and
conditions in the Agreement. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute only one instrument between the parties. Except to the extent amended
hereby, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 The parties have executed and delivered this Amendment on the dates indicated below to be effective as of the SOW
#1 Date. 
  

									
	Delta:	 		 	Contractor:
			
	DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware corporation	 		 	 GOGO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

					
	By:	 	/s/ John Reynolds	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Dave Bijur


									
	 Name: John Reynolds
	 		 	 Name: Dave Bijur

	 Title: Commodity Manger, SCM
	 		 	 Title: SVP, Regional President

					
	Date:	 	April 21, 2017	 		 	Date:	 	 May 9, 2017



  
 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re:

HARRY B. GREENHOUSE, 

Debtor. / 

Case No.: 21-12844-RAM

Chapter 11 

ORDER DENYING POLYCHAIN’S MOTION FOR ALLOWANCE 

AND PAYMENT OF FEES AND EXPENSES [ECF #633] 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Polychain’s Motion for Allowance and 

Payment of Fees and Expenses Incurred in Connection with Making a Substantial Contribution to 

the Debtor’s Chapter 11 Case for the Period of April 2, 2021 through February 24, 2023 [ECF 

#633] (the “Motion”) and the Debtor’s objection thereto [ECF #636], for the reasons stated on the 

record in the Court’s bench ruling on March 2, 2023, which are incorporated herein by reference,

it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 7, 2023.

Case 21-12844-RAM Doc 657 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 2
1. The Motion is DENIED.

2. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce and interpret this Order.

###

Submitted by:

By: /s/ Nicole Grimal Helmstetter

Nicole Grimal Helmstetter, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 86937 

BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC

Two South Biscayne Boulevard 

One Biscayne Tower, Suite 1500 

Miami, FL 33131-1822 

Telephone: (305) 347-4080 

Facsimile: (305) 347-4089 

Nicole.Helmstetter@bipc.com

Counsel for Debtor in Possession

Order Copy to: Nicole Grimal Helmstetter, Esq., who is directed to serve a conforming copy of 

this order on interested parties who do not receive service by CM/ECF and file a proof of service 

within three days of entry of this order. 

Case 21-12844-RAM Doc 657 Filed 03/08/23 Page 2 of 2