alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-5487]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 61 / Friday, March 30, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 15195]]



DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Transportation Security Administration

49 CFR Part 1572

[Docket No. TSA-2006-24191; TSA Amendment Nos. 1515-(New), 1540-8, 
1570-2, and 1572-7]
RIN 1652-AA41


Transportation Worker Identification Credential Implementation in 
the Maritime Sector; Hazardous Materials Endorsement for a Commercial 
Driver's License; Correction

Correction

    In rule document E7-5487 beginning on page 14049 in the issue of 
Monday, March 26, 2007, make the following correction:


Sec.  1572.103  [Corrected]

    On page 14050, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in the 
third line, ``(b)(2)(xii)'' should read ``(b)(2)(xiii)''.

[FR Doc. Z7-5487 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 153 (Monday, August 10, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 42665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10810]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 42665]]



FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Correction

    In notice document 98-20298 beginning on page 40713, in the issue 
of Thursday, July 30, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 40714, in the second column, in the 21st line from the 
bottom, ``17.5'' should read ``37.5''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, James K. Bass certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Suntron Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: March 26, 2004 /s/ James K. Bass   James K. Bass *President and Chief Executive Officer* *(Principal Executive Officer)*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - (-)colorado(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        February 10, 2023        Boulder, Colorado
B.L., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

V.P., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

H.H., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

J.V., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

T.H., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

J.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

D.P., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

M.R., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

B.A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

M.A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

A.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2449 CASE NO.: 2D16-2451 CASE NO.: 2D16-2452 CASE NO.: 2D16-2819 CASE NO.: 2D16-2820 CASE NO.: 2D16-2821 CASE NO.: 2D16-2822 CASE NO.: 2D16-3291 CASE NO.: 2D16-3292 CASE NO.: 2D16-3293 CASE NO.: 2D16-3294

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Remanded.
Ramsey Allen SELF, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Complaint of Benjamin Edelman, Esq. Docket DOT

- OST

- 20 13

- 0025

MOTION OF BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Richard Mendles

General Counsel, Americas

James B. Blaney

Senior Counsel, Americas

British Airways Plc

2 Park Avenue, Suite 1100

New York, NY 10016

richard.mendles@ba.com

jim.blaney@ba.com Don H. Hainbach

Erin M. Tallardy

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20036

Phone: 202

- 776

- 3970

dhainbach@ggh

- airlaw.com

etallardy@ggh

- airlaw.com

February 11 , 2013
Carlos SANCHEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 2001-B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of November 1, 2001 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2001-B, as issuer
(the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from November
     1, 2001 until December 31, 2001 was conducted under my supervision.

2.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fully
     performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the Sale and
     Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material default in the
     performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
     forth in paragraph 3 below.

3.   None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2002.


                                                         /s/ Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                         Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Suntron Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-89238, on Form S-8 of Suntron Corporation of our report dated April 11,
2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Suntron Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in
the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Suntron Corporation.

Our report refers to the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1,
2002.

The consolidated financial statements of Suntron Corporation as of December 31,
2001 and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, have been restated to
reflect the combination of entities under common control with K*TEC Operating
Company, L.L.C. (formerly known as Thayer-BLUM Funding II, L.L.C.) and
subsidiary as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. We
did not audit the consolidated financial statements of K*TEC Operating Company,
L.L.C. for the period from September 14, 2000 (inception) through December 31,
2000 which statements reflect total revenues constituting 29 percent Suntron
Corporation's fiscal 2000 consolidated revenues. Those statements were audited
by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements in their report
dated May 25, 2001.

/s/  KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
April 11, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PARK HILL CAPITAL I CORP.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2001, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 19, 2005


                                /s/ Francis Mailhot
                                -------------------
                                Francis Mailhot,
                                Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 135

[Docket No. 28743; Notice No. 98-1]
RIN 2120-AG55


Commerical Passenger-Carrying Operations in Single-Engine 
Aircraft Under Instrument Flight Rules

Correction

    In proposed rule notice document 98-3344 beginning on page 6826, in 
the issue of Tuesday, February 10, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 6826, in the first column, the Docket line should be set 
forth as above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
(106 So. 781)

No. 27611.

#### STATE v. FORET.

(Jan. 4, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Criminal law <&wkey; 1158(1)—Supreme Court without jurisdiction to review sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction for unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor.

Supreme Court was without jurisdiction, in view of Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10, to review sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction for unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes, where there was some evidence before trial judge of facts essential to conviction.

Appeal from Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche; Robert B. Butler, Judge.

Aleide Foret was convicted of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Camille A. Morvant, of Thibodaux, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. A. O. Coignet, Dist. Atty., of Thibodaux (E. R. Sehowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

LAND, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for having unlawfully in his possession intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes.

The case comes before us on a single bill of exceptions reserved to the overruling by the trial judge of a motion for a new trial based upon the insufficiency of the evidence adduced at the trial to convict.

This court is without jurisdiction to review this complaint, as the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court extends to criminal cases on questions of law alone. There was some evidence before the trial judge of facts essential to conviction. Const. 1921, § 10, art. 7; State v. Franques, 156 La. 462, 100 So. 682; State v. Venezia, 151 La. 349, 91 So. 761; State v. Tyler, 150 La. 131, 90 So. 538.

The conviction and sentence are therefore affirmed.
Pablo ANZALDUA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4566

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

I, JON A. LATORELLA, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of LocatePlus Holdings
Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and we have:

     (A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (C) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (A) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (B) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                           /s/ Jon R. Latorella
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jon R. Latorella
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           April 30, 2003
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Total petroleum systems of the Pelagian Province, Tunisia, Libya, Italy, and Malta; the Bou Dabbous, Tertiary and Jurassic-Cretaceous composite      

      December 1, 2001    

Undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources were assessed within total petroleum systems of the Pelagian Province(2048) as part of the U.S. Geological Survey World PetroleumAssessment 2000. The Pelagian Province is located mainly in eastern Tunisia and northwestern Libya. Small portions of the province extend into Malta and offshore Italy. Although several petroleum systems may exist, only two ?composite? total petroleum systems were identified. Each total petroleum system comprises a single assessment unit. These total petroleum systems are called the Bou Dabbous?Tertiary and Jurassic-Cretaceous Composite, named after the source-rock intervals and reservoir-rock ages.The main source rocks include mudstone of the Eocene Bou Dabbous Formation; Cretaceous Bahloul, Lower Fahdene, and M?Cherga Formations; and Jurassic Nara Formation. Known reservoirs are in carbonate rocks and sandstone intervals throughout the Upper Jurassic, Cretaceous,and Tertiary sections. Traps for known accumulations include fault blocks, low-amplitude anticlines, high-amplitude anticlines associated with reverse faults, wrench fault structures,and stratigraphic traps.The estimated means of the undiscovered conventional petroleum volumes in total petroleum systems of the Pelagian Province are as follows:[MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet of gas; MMBNGL, million barrels of natural gas liquids]Total Petroleum SystemMMBO BCFG MMBNGLBou Dabbous?Tertiary 667 2,746 64 Jurassic-Cretaceous Composite 403 2,280 27

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 
 **COLLECTORS UNIVERSE, INC.**
 
 Annual Report on Form 10-K
 for the Year ended June 30, 2004
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Annual Report"), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: September 24, 2004/s/ MICHAEL J. LEWISMichael J. LewisChief Financial Officer
Ricardo ESTAPE and Nicholas C. Lambrou, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: 3D16-2709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-130-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      November 12, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Liu BoLiu
      Bo
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                (principal
      executive officer)