alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICEWEB, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
        The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  February 16, 2010  By:/s/ John R. Signorello John R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Minnesota.

_________________

Nos. 95-3934/4020

_________________

Alfredo Rodriguez Sosa, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeals from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 2, 1996

 Filed: July 5, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Alfredo Rodriguez Sosa appeals the district court's denials of his 1

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and his motion for a personal recognizance bond

pending the court's ruling on his section 2255 motion. We conclude the

district court correctly denied relief. We likewise conclude the district

court properly denied Sosa's motion for release, which was filed after the

court entered its order denying Sosa's section 2255 motion. Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 19-01298-MAM    Doc 472-9    Filed 10/22/20    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-01298-MAM    Doc 472-9    Filed 10/22/20    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-01298-MAM    Doc 472-9    Filed 10/22/20    Page 3 of 3
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Beatrice Miles Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 1,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 1,000.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. $ 338.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

December 1, 2021 /s/ Brooks Richard Siegel

Date Brooks Richard Siegel 0127202

Signature of Attorney

Bankruptcy Law Group, PLLC.

3323 NE 163rd Street

Suite 504

North Miami Beach, FL 33160

9548004349

bsiegel@bklgp.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-21390-EPK Doc 5 Filed 12/01/21 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 23, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 23, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0180. SPP KR FUND, LLC v. SATPAL SHIKH d/b/a ALL CARE DENTAL.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2021SV1017
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 25 (Monday, February 9, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-30763]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation

7 CFR Part 1412

RIN 0560-AH84


Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program and Average Crop Revenue 
Election Program

Correction

    In rule document E8-30763 beginning on page 79284 in the issue of 
December 29, 2008, make the following correction:


Sec. 1412.53  [Corrected]

    On page 79299, in the third column, Sec. 1412.53(b)(1)(ii)(K) 
should read:
    (K) Other oilseeds-$9.30/cwt.

[FR Doc. Z8-30763 Filed 2-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Shelley M. WRIGHT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SERVITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: 3D18-0199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 83 (Wednesday, April 30, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 23534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-50430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

29 CFR Part 2570

RIN 1210-0056


Proposed Rule Relating to Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-10078, beginning on page 19078 in the 
issue of Friday, April 18, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 19079, in the first column, in the second paragraph, in 
the sixth line, ``Construction'' should read ``Constitution''.
    2. On page 19079, in the first column, in the second paragraph, in 
the eleventh line <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e3e3e3d332e3f3a1e342e293c3f703a313270393128">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6d5dbc6d7d2f6dcc6c1d4d798d2d9da98d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>'' should read 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6d6d6d5dbc6d7d2dcf6c6c1d4d798d2d9da98d1d9c0">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9f918c9d9896bc8c8b9e9dd2989390d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE EX REL. Darren MILLER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0733

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Elvin D Peralta 21-13819 RAM 5/24/21 Photo ID/SS card - Legible/Unredacted ✔

Missing 2016(B) IVL Valuation motion not filed ✔ Amend plan to include child supp info ✔

✔ 09/Nissan ✔ #5327 (3/18/21-4/21/21) ✔

Affidavit of support LF 90 - Signed LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity✔ Missing Attorney's Declaration & 341 Written Quest.

Case 21-13819-RAM Doc 16 Filed 05/28/21 Page 1 of 1
PUBLISHED FILED: October 20, 1997
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1853

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE BLUE RIDGE; HERBERT C. JONES, JR., M.D.; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON; VIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD; HILLCREST CLINIC; RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN; THOMAS GRESINGER, M.D.; COMMONWEALTH WOMEN'S CLINIC; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA, Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus
JAMES L. CAMBLOS, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the County of Albemarle, and as a representative of all the Commonwealth's Attorneys in Virginia, Defendant - Appellant.

ORDER

On March 22, 1997, the Governor of Virginia signed into law Virginia's Parental Notification Act. Va. Code Ann. § 16.1- 241(V). The Act prohibits a physician from performing an abortion on an unemancipated minor unless one of the minor's parents or a guardian has been notified within twenty-four hours2 prior to the procedure or unless the minor receives judicial approval to forgo notification. Id. Before the law was to go into effect on July 1, 1997, plaintiffs, several Virginia physicians and interest groups, brought suit in the Western District of Virginia requesting that the operation of the statute be enjoined. The district court granted a preliminary injunction, and the Commonwealth that same day petitioned Judge Luttig for a stay of the district court's injunction. The stay was granted on June 30, 1997, and plaintiffs-appellees now move the Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(c) and Local Rule 27(f) to vacate the stay of the district court's order pending appeal. The motion was referred to the Court for consideration. On a poll of the Court, Chief Judge Wilkinson, Judge Russell, Judge Widener, Judge Wilkins, Judge Niemeyer, Judge Luttig and Judge Williams voted to deny the motion to vacate the stay. Judge Hall, Judge Murnaghan, Judge Ervin, Judge Michael and Judge Motz voted to grant the motion to vacate the stay. Judge Hamilton abstained from voting. As a majority of the Court has voted to deny the motion to vacate the stay of the district court's order pending appeal, the plaintiffs-appellees' motion is hereby denied. For the Court,3

CLERK
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

2723

Vol. 63, No. 11

Friday, January 16, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation

Title I, P.L. 480 Agreements With the

Private Trade

Correction

In notice document 97–31480

beginning on page 63694, in the issue of

Tuesday, December 2, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 63694, in the second column,

in the DATES section, in the second

line, ‘‘February 2, 1997’’ should read

‘‘February 2, 1998’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 226

[Regulation Z; Docket No. R-0960]

Truth in Lending

Correction

In rule document 97–31087 beginning

on page 63441, in the issue of Monday,

December 1, 1997, make the following

correction:

Appendix H to Part 226 [Corrected]

On page 63444, in the third column,

in appendix H to part 226, the heading

‘‘Example’’ should read ‘‘[Example’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 513 and 602

[TD 8734]

RIN 1545-AU43; 1545-AT77

General Revision of Regulations

Relating to Withholding of Tax on

Certain U.S. Source Income Paid to

Foreign Persons and Related

Collection, Refunds, and Credits;

Revision of Information Reporting and

Backup Withholding Regulations; and

Removal of Regulations Under Part

35a and of Certain Regulations Under

Income Tax Treaties

Correction

In rule document 97–25998,

beginning on page 53387, in the issue of

Tuesday, October 14, 1997, make the

following correction:

§ 513.2 [Corrected]

1. On page 53497, in the first column,

in § 513.2, in the fifth line, ‘‘does’’

should read ‘‘does not’’.

§ 602.101 [Corrected]

2. On page 53498, in the second

column, in § 602.101(c), in the last table,

in the third line, ‘‘11.1441–8’’ should

read ‘‘1.1441–8’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
B. S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 02, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

Case No. 19-10655-BKC-SMG

CONSUMER ADVOCACY CENTER, INC.

Chapter 7

 Debtor.

 _______ /

SONYA SALKIN SLOTT,

Chapter 7 Trustee ADV. NO. 21-01007-SMG

Plaintiff,

v.

THE BREA FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC 

D/B/A PUB CLUB LEADS and ADAM STHAY,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Gregory Garno, Esq., certify that the Plaintiff’s Adversary Complaint [ECF No. 01]; 

Summons and Notice of Status Conference [ECF No. 02]; and the Order Setting Status Conference 

and Establishing Procedures and Deadlines [ECF No. 03] were served upon the Defendants on

January 14, 2021 via:

[X] Mail Service: Regular First Class U.S. Mail, Postage Fully Pre-Paid, addressed to all 

parties on the Service List below. 

[ ] Personal Service: By leaving the process with defendant or with an officer or agent of

defendant at:

[ ] Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at:

[X] Certified Mail Service by sending the process by certified mail addressed to the 

following officer of the defendants as disclosed on the Service List below

[ ] Publication: The defendant was served as follows: [Describe briefly]

Case 21-01007-SMG Doc 4 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 2
[ ] State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of

__________________, as follows: [Describe briefly]

If service was made by personal service, by residence service, or pursuant to state law, I further 

certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 18 years of age 

and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made.

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: January 14, 2021 Signature: /s/ Gregory M. Garno

Print Name: Gregory M. Garno, Esq., 

Fla. Bar. No. 087505

Address: 100 SE 2nd Street, 44th Floor

City: Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: (305) 349-2300

E-mail: ggarno@gjb-law.com

SERVICE LIST

The parties below were served via U.S. Mail and Certified Mail:

The Brea Financial Group, LLC

c/o Adam G Sthay, Managing Member

351 S. Old Bridge Road

Anaheim Hills, CA 92808

 

The Brea Financial Group, LLCc/o Adam G Sthay, Registered Agent

751 S. Weir Canyon Rd., Ste 157

PMB 542

Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 

PubClubLeads 

774 S Placentia Ave, #301

Placentia, CA 92870

PubClubLeads 

c/o The Brea Financial Group, LLC, Owner

774 S Placentia Ave, #301

Placentia, CA 92870

 

Adam G Sthay

751 S. Weir Canyon Rd., Ste 157

PMB 542

Anaheim Hills, CA 92808

Adam G Sthay

7023 E Shorecrest Drive

Anaheim, CA 92807-4506

Case 21-01007-SMG Doc 4 Filed 01/14/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International
Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Stephen Walters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Stephen Walters
-------------------
Stephen Walters
Chief Executive Officer
November 20, 2006
Peter Thomas STAVROU, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ISLAND BREEZE BOAT CLUB & RENTAL, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2286

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 3 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 4 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 5 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 6 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 7 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 8 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 9 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 10 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 11 of 12
Case 21-20416-MAM Doc 90 Filed 05/09/22 Page 12 of 12