alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 1 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 2 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 3 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 4 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 5 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 6 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 7 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 8 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 9 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 10 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 11 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 12 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 13 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 14 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 15 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 16 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 17 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 18 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 19 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 20 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 21 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 22 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 23 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 24 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 25 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 26 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 27 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 28 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 29 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 30 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 31 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 32 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 33 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 34 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 35 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 36 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 37 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 38 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 39 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 40 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 41 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 42 of 43
Case 22-12107-SMG Doc 22 Filed 03/31/22 Page 43 of 43
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers certain 

medical records of veterans who receive health care from 

such providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5162 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vet Connect Act of 

3 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO DISCLOSE CERTAIN MEDICAL 

5 RECORDS OF VETERANS WHO RECEIVE NON6 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

7 HEALTH CARE. 

8 Section 7332(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(H) To a non-Department entity (including 

12 private entities and other departments or agencies of 

13 the Federal Government) that provides hospital care 

14 or medical treatment to veterans.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(16)
              - california(3)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - (-)wyoming(1)

## By Year

publication        October 1, 2014        Dynamics of the Yellowstone hydrothermal system
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEBORAH JANE WYNN, pro se,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CALLAN APPRAISAL

INCORPORATED; JOHN CALLAN,

 Defendants - Appellees,

HSBC BANK USA, N.A.,

 Consol. Plaintiff - Appellee.

No. 12-16192

D.C. Nos. 2:09-cv-01587-RCJ

 2:10-cv-01897-RCJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted January 21, 2015*** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

FILED

FEB 2 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 

** The Honorable Robert Clive Jones, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 
Deborah Jane Wynn appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying

her motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to set aside the judgments

in two consolidated actions arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Casey

v. Albertson’s Inc., 362 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wynn’s Rule 60(b)

motions because Wynn failed to establish any ground for relief from judgment. 

See Am. Ironworks & Erectors Inc. v. N. Am. Constr. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 899

(9th Cir. 2001) (setting forth grounds for relief under Rule 60(b) and explaining

that a district court does not abuse its discretion by denying a Rule 60(b) motion

where movant merely reargues issues raised previously); see also Fantasyland

Video, Inc. v. County of San Diego, 505 F.3d 996, 1005 (9th Cir. 2007) (relief

under Rule 60(b)(6) is available “only where extraordinary circumstances

prevented a party from taking timely action to prevent or correct an erroneous

judgment”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam).

We deny Wynn’s request for oral argument, filed on February 27, 2013, and

2 12-16192
her motion to supplement the record, filed on January 3, 2014, see Kirshner v.

Uniden Corp. of Am., 842 F.2d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED.

3 12-16192
William PIERRE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0902

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Banco de Chile (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 29, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Fernando Cañas B.  
|                     |  |  |  | Fernando Cañas B.      
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 29, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Pedro Samhan E.    
|                     |  |  |  | Pedro Samhan E.        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Banco de Chile and will be retained by Banco de Chile and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jonathan K. LEWIS, Appellant, v. POPEYES CHICKEN, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3943

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

2.010- OJ..1Q

rDocket No. FAA-~*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-148-AD]

R1N 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 Selies Airplan

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

m

iZ.//7 U,;.

UliNG SYMBOl-

- It B.

;''L/{~/cfI

~OlIfiNG SYMflOL

SEiI PrEG:

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUM.MARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

".

Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of one A319 and one

A321 in-service aeroplane.

Investigation has determined that the defects reported on both rudders

corresponded to areas that had been reworked in production. The

investigation confimled that the defects were a result of de-bonding

between the skin and honeycomb core.

An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may degrade the

structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder leads to

degradation of the handling qualities and reduces the controllability of the

aeroplane.

* * * * * * *

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe "] OJ 0

~1l'liSYMOOL

.. 11,'1)/"1-/1

condltlon as:

Isl A~.

~"

3/V///D

RO"TINC~V",)(l"

/1)"1'1-.01

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condjti
STATE EX REL. Jonathan YORK v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0389

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Engine Rating [1],[4] = 1,900 kW

2,547 HP

Operating Time [2] = 2 hrs/day

100 hrs/yr

Fuel Type [1] = ULSD

Maximum 

Hourly 

Emissions

Maximum 

Daily 

Emissions

Annual 

Emissions

Value Units (lb/hr) (lb/day) (tons/yr)

PM AP-42 [6],[7] 0.43 g/kW-hr 1.78 3.57 0.089

PM10 AP-42 [6],[7] 0.24 g/kW-hr 1.02 2.05 0.051

PM2.5 AP-42 [6],[7] 0.24 g/kW-hr 0.99 1.98 0.050

NOx

IMO Tier 2 [4] 7.85 g/kW-hr 32.88 65.76 1.64

SO2 Fuel S Content [3] 1.12E-05 lb/HP-hr 2.86E-02 5.71E-02 1.43E-03

CO

Maufacturer 

Specification [8] 0.38 g/kW-hr 1.59 3.18 0.08

VOC AP-42 [7] 7.50 g/kW-hr 31.42 62.83 1.57

Pb EPA [5] 2.03E-07 lb/HP-hr 5.17E-04 1.03E-03 2.59E-05

H2SO4

Fuel S Content [3] 3.50E-07 lb/HP-hr 8.92E-04 1.78E-03 4.46E-05

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8] As per manufacturer's specification sheet.

Emission factors are based on AP-42 Chapter 3, Table 3.4-1, Emission Factors for Large Stationary Diesel and all 

Stationary Dual-fuel Engines (October 1996).

PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors obtained by applying the ratio of PM/PM10 and PM/PM2.5 from AP-42 Chapter 3, Table 

3.4-1 and Table 3.4-2.

Lead emission factor obtained from EPA guidance document: Locating and Estimating Air Emissions from Sources of 

Lead and Lead Compounds, EPA 454/R-98-006, May 1998, Section 5.2.2. Emission factor for distillate oil-fired gas 

turbines was used as a surrogate for distillate oil-fired engines due to lack of emission factors. An average brake-specific 

fuel consumption (BSFC) of 7,000 Btu/hp-hr was used to convert from lb/MMBtu to lb/hp-hr.

Engine specifications sheet provided by Ms. Sara Carlson (Anadarko) to Mr. Rahul Pendse (Trinity) via email on March 

11, 2013.

Anadarko is proposing the use of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel for all diesel combustion sources. Therefore, emissions have 

been calculated based on a maximum sulfur content of 15 ppm in diesel fuel assuming that 98 percent of sulfur in the fuel 

is oxidized to SO2 and 2 percent of sulfur in the fuel is oxidized to H2SO4 based on Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis: 

Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines, EPA420-R-03-008, April 2003. An average brake-specific fuel 

consumption (BSFC) of 7,000 Btu/hp-hr was used to convert from lb/MMBtu to lb/hp-hr.

Operating time for this engine has been assumed to be 2 hrs/day and 100 hrs/year.

As per the specification sheet, the engine is IMO Tier 2 compliant for NOx Emissions.

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Emission Calculations

Emergency Generator

Emission Factor 

 Pollutant Emission Factor 

Basis

DR-GE-01

Criteria Pollutants

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

EGOM Exploratory Project - Blackhawk 1 of 1

 DR-GE-01 - Criteria
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                    AGREEMENT DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                 SERIES 2001-10


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., the
Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2001-10,
do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the
preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv D21
Form CGFCRD3Z (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−15049−PDR

Chapter: 7

In re:

Altagracia Tavarez

7825 Alhambra Boulevard

Miramar, FL 33023−5821

SSN: xxx−xx−9397

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Peter D. Russin to consider the

following:

Emergency Motion to Continue the Automatic Stay Filed by Debtor Altagracia Tavarez

(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Debtor's Affidavit) (Sanchez, Robert) (11)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: June 17, 2021

Time: 11:30 AM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although

conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom

must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct

themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day

before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimENeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 6/14/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Christina Romero

Courtroom Deputy

Case 21-15049-PDR Doc 12 Filed 06/14/21 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quiet geomagnetic field representation for all days and latitudes      

      January 1, 1992    

This paper describes a technique for obtaining the quiet-time geomagnetic field variation expected for all days of the year and distribution of latitudes from a limited set of selected quiet days within a year at a discrete set of locations. We used a data set of observatories operated by Indian and USSR scientists in 1976 and 1977 near 75°E longitude as illustration. Our method relies upon spatial smoothing of the decomposed spectral components. An evaluation of the fidelity of the resulting model shows correlation coefficients usually above 0.9 at the lower latitudes and near 0.7 at the higher latitudes with variations identified as dependent upon season and field element.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of June 12, 2017 by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and John R. Peeler.

 

The parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement effective June 12, 2017, as amended June 12, 2014, June 12, 2008, December 31, 2008, June 11, 2010, April 25, 2012 and July 24, 2013 (the “Agreement”).

 

The parties herby agree as follows:

 

1.              The Company’s agreement to reimburse the reasonable housing expenses for Mr. Peeler in the Plainview, New York area and his transportation expenses to/from the Plainview area from/to his home in Maryland, including tax gross-up for these amounts, shall be amended as follows:

 

a)             Such reimbursement shall continue to be payable through June 12, 2020, provided that Mr. Peeler continues to serve in good standing as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

 

b)             Such reimbursement shall not be eligible for a reimbursement payment for tax gross-ups.

 

c)              Such amounts shall not exceed $75,000 per year.

 

2.              Except as amended herby, the Agreement shall continue in accordance with its terms.

 

The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

 

	
VEECO   INSTRUMENTS INC.
    	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Gordon Hunter
    	
 
    	
/s/ John R. Peeler
    
	
Name: Gordon Hunter
    	
 
    	
John R. Peeler
    
	
Chairman of the Compensation Committee
David M. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1449

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 231 (Monday, December 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95222-95223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28087]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration

Recharter for the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education 
and Practice

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department 
of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, HHS is 
hereby giving notice that the National Advisory Council on Nurse 
Education and Practice (NACNEP or Council) is rechartered.

DATES: The effective date of the recharter is November 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Bala-Hampton, Bureau of Health 
Workforce, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; 301-443-
2765 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NACNEP provides advice and recommendations 
to the Secretary of HHS and Congress on policy matters and the 
preparation of general regulations concerning activities under title 
VIII of the Public Health Service Act, including the range of issues 
relating to the nurse workforce, education, and practice improvement. 
NACNEP also prepares and submits an annual report to the Secretary of 
HHS and Congress describing its activities, including NACNEP's findings 
and recommendations concerning activities under title VIII, as required 
by the Public Health Service Act. The recharter of NACNEP was approved 
on October 31, 2024. The filing date for the NACNEP recharter is 
November 30, 2024. The recharter of NACNEP gives authorization for the 
Council to operate until November 30, 2026.
    A copy of the NACNEP charter is available on the NACNEP website at 
https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/nursing/about.html. A copy of 
the charter can also be obtained by accessing the FACA database that is

[[Page 95223]]

maintained by the Committee Management Secretariat under the General 
Services Administration. The website address for the FACA database is 
https://www.facadatabase.gov/.

Maria G. Button,
Director, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2024-28087 Filed 11-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
```