alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: DOLCE VITA FOOTWEAR, INC., 

Appellant

______________________

2021-2114, 2021-2115

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

88554717, 88554722.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

May 6, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 6, 2022

Case: 21-2114 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 05/06/2022
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 13653 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 13654 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 13655 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 13656 1984
Case 21-17841-RAM Doc 28-1 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-17841-RAM Doc 28-1 Filed 12/15/21 Page 2 of 2
Jonathan IBERO, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES and Sedgwick/CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of the Liquidation of Manhattan Casualty Company.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 7, 1972.

*Leonard H. Minches*for Superintendent of Insurance, as Liquidator of Manhattan Casualty Company, petitioner. *Norman Annenberg*for Harry Berg and another, respondents.

Jacob Mabkowitz, J.

Petitioner, the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, appointed liquidator of the subject insurance company (Manhattan Casualty Company) by order issued in 1963, seeks court approval of the settlement of two actions in which petitioner, acting as liquidator, is plaintiff. One of these actions is pending in this court, and one in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the proposed settlement, $1,000,000- will be paid petitioner. Petitioner asserts tljat this would result in payment in full of all allowed claims of creditors.

Objections to the settlement are raised by one creditor of Manhattan and by the estate of the now deceased and alleged sole shareholders of Manhattan. They contend that the potential recovery in the actions sought to be settled approximates $5,000,000 and that,, accordingly, the proposed settlement is unreasonable.

The moving papers contain descriptions of the nature of the claims asserted by petitioner and the history of the litigation, *358but little more. This is insufficient evidence on which to find the proposed settlement adequate, even after granting petitioner’s judgment the substantial weight to which it is entitled (cf. *Matter of New York Tit. & Mtge. Co.,*170 Misc. 109).

Objectors’ arguments that this court lacks jurisdiction to pass on the settlement are not well founded. In addition to the specific provisions of sections 526 and 539 of the Insurance Law the applicable decisional law indicates general recognition of the jurisdiction of this court over matters such as this *(Matter of Knickerbocker Agency [Holz], 4 N*Y 2d 245, 252), even where claims of Federal agencies are involved (see *Katin*v. *Apollo Savings,*318 F. Supp. 1055). In the instant case no such Federal claims are actually present; the objectors’ arguments are based upon the Federal nature of the claims asserted by petitioner in the United States District Court. A fortiori, this does not interfere with this court’s jurisdiction.

A Referee will be appointed to hear and report on the fairness of the settlement. Pending the report of the Referee the motion will be held in abeyance. Cross motion is denied.
Exhibit 99.3

               Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, Gaylen M. Brotherson, state and attest that:

     (1)  To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  upon a  review  of the  covered
          reports  of  M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc.,  and,  except  as  corrected  or
          supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

          o    no covered  report  contained  an untrue  statement of a material
               fact as of the end of the period  covered  by such  report (or in
               the case of a report on Form 8-K or definitive  proxy  materials,
               as of the date on which it was filed); and

          o    no covered  report  omitted to state a material fact necessary to
               make  the  statements  in the  covered  report,  in  light of the
               circumstances  under which they were made,  not  misleading as of
               the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
               report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials,  as of the date
               on which it was filed).

     (2)  I have  reviewed the  contents of this  statement  with the  Company's
          Audit Committee.

     (3)  In this statement  under oath,  each of the following,  if filed on or
          before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

          o    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings,  Inc. for the year
               ended  October 31, 2002 filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
               Commission, File Number 1-9183,

          o    all  reports  on Form  10-Q,  all  reports  on  Form  8-K and all
               definitive  proxy materials of M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc. filed with
               the  Commission  subsequent  to  the  filing  of  the  Form  10-K
               identified above; and

          o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.

By: /s/ Gaylen M. Brotherson
-------------------------------
Gaylen M. Brotherson
June 14, 2004
                                              Subscribed and sworn to before me
                                              This 14th day of June 2004.

                                              /s/ Marjorie Smith
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Notary Public
                                              My Commission Expires:
                                              March 18, 2008


                                       18
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00759-CV

A. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-21-002232, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant A. B. filed his notice of appeal on November 18, 2022. The appellate 

record was complete on December 7, 2022, making appellant’s brief due on January 17, 2023. On

January 17, 2023, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from 

suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days for 

court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order Karen J. Langsley to file appellant’s 

brief no later than January 23, 2023. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to 

show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on January 20, 2023.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cardinal Minerals, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Roland Vetter, President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

/s/Roland Vetter                                 

RolandVetter

Presidentand Chief Financial Officer

August23, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gusana Explorations, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew B. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Andrew B. Stewart
___________________________
Andrew B. Stewart
Chief Financial Officer



December 6, 2002
Aaron Bruce CARPENTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2686

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 177 (Monday, September 14, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

46 CFR Part 249

[MARAD 98-4395]
RIN No. 2133-AB 36


Approval of Underwriters for Marine Hull Insurance

Correction

    Proposed rule document 98-23908 appearing on pages 47217-47218 in 
the issue of Friday, September 4, 1998 was withdrawn by the Maritime 
Administration. It should not have appeared in the Federal Register.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 73424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-24676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

12 CFR Part 584

[Docket ID OTS-2007-0007]
1550-AC10


Permissible Activities of Savings and Loan Holding Companies

Correction

    In rule document E7-24676 beginning on page 72235 in the issue of 
Thursday, December 20, 2007 make the following correction:
    On page 72235, in the second column, under DATES, ``April, 2008'' 
should read ``April 1, 2008''.
[FR Doc. Z7-24676 Filed 12-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 4941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50125]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-AGL-42]


Modification of Class D and Class E Airspace, and Removal of 
Class E Airspace; Belleville, IL

Correction

    In rule document 98-2450 beginning on page 5229, in the issue of 
Monday, February 2, 1998, make the following corrections:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 5230, in the second column, in Sec. 71.1:
      a. In the second line, under AGL IL D Belleville, IL [Revised], 
``long. 89 deg.32'01''W'' should read ``long. 89 deg.50'01''W''.
      b. In the fourth line, under AGL IL E5 Belleville, IL [Revised], 
``Lat. 38 deg.32'41''N'' should read ``Lat. 38 deg.32'42''N''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. John McWhorter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ R. John McWhorter   
|R. John McWhorter       
|Secretary, Treasurer and
|Chief Financial Officer 
|                        
|Date: March 5, 2004
Steven BEEBE, Appellant, v. Michelle Kimberly HODGES-WRAY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

______________________________

 )

In re ) CASE NO. 22-10474-RAM

)

MATTIE MURRAY ROBERTS, ) CHAPTER 13

 )

Debtor. )

______________________________)

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO ENFORCE STAY

On February 4, 2022, the Court docketed the Debtor’s Motion for 

Stay of Eviction and Relief Due to Harassment From Eviction Attorneys

(the “Motion”) [DE #12]. In her Motion, the Debtor states that she 

was served with an eviction notice after she filed her petition for 

bankruptcy relief. The Court is not making any findings of fact 

based on the Debtor’s Motion. Having reviewed the record in this 

case and in the bankruptcy cases previously filed by the Debtor, the 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 4, 2022.

Case 22-10474-RAM Doc 14 Filed 02/04/22 Page 1 of 2
2

Court finds only that the automatic stay presently is in effect in 

this bankruptcy case. Therefore, it is –

ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part. The Court confirms 

that the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) presently is 

in effect in this case.

###

CLERK TO SERVE:

Mattie Murray Roberts

1911 NW 76th Street

Miami, FL 33147

Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners

6409 Congress Avenue

Suite 100

Boca Raton, FL 33487 

Case 22-10474-RAM Doc 14 Filed 02/04/22 Page 2 of 2
EX PARTE Jonathan Lee DOUGLAS

1160631 (CR-16-0098)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Laguan WARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10617]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3654]


Starwood Advertising, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, 
and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
Colorado-based advertising agency and its officer from using deceptive 
demonstrations and certains other misrepresentations in future 
advertising campaigns.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 2, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Toby Levin, FTC/S-4002, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, February 22, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 6851, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Starwood Advertising, Inc., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

    Authority: Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or 
applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96- 15312 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
Providence St. Mary Medical Center 

PO Box 1477 

401 W. Poplar Street 

Walla Walla. WA 99362 

(509) 525 3320 

www.smmc.com 

June 21, 2012 

Ms. Aloha ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Program 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE W86·310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

t PROVIDENCE 

St. Mary 

Medical Center 

As a frequent business traveler of Walla Walla, I strongly support the air service proposal to enhance 

passenger services to the Walla Walla Regional Airport detailed in the Small Comm4nity Air Service 

Development Program grant application. The Walla Walla Regional Airport plays an important role in 

providing support to business, government, education, and leisure travel to and from our community. 

The $250,000 federal request would be coupled with $50,000 raised from our community to provide 

critical funding for a series of marketing initiatives to build both inbound and outbound traffic. I am 

confident that this grant can make a significant difference for the future of commercial air service in the 

Walla Walla Valley. 

Our community currently faces a very serious problem with the possible elimination of service with 

Alaska Airlines. The loss of air service would be a devastating blow to our economy and the many 

sectors that rely on it for conducting and building their business ih our valley. 

I greatly appreciate your serious review of thf' Port of Walla Walla's grant application. Please help us 

make a difference in our community. If you wl.sh to further discuss the merits of the application or 

commercial air service In Walla Walla, feel free to co'ntac.t me at 509-522·5890, 

Thank you in advance for your attention to thi~> important matter. 

Steven A. Burdick, CEO
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - nevada(1)

## By Year

State News Release        February 17, 2015        Dr. Jill Baron New Director of North American Nitrogen Center
EX PARTE Joe REID

1160651 (CR-15-0580)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Cosmo Palmieri, Treasurer of Oriole Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oriole Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 17, 2005

/s/ Cosmo Palmieri
------------------
Cosmo Palmieri
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)