alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Michael Muzio, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Blue Moon Group,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect eh registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.



/s/ MICHAEL MUZIO
------------------
Michael Muzio
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          29,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    139,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,836
<PP&E>                                         135,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,676)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,863,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          657,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,273
<COMMON>                                         7,764
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,863,307
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,250
<CGS>                                         (23,432)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               238,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (226,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (226,378)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (226,378)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5300 

To prohibit any appropriation of funds to the National Park Service for 

the study of how artificial light affects the movements and behavior 

of insects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2016 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit any appropriation of funds to the National Park 

Service for the study of how artificial light affects the 

movements and behavior of insects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING PROHIBITION. 

4 No funds are authorized to be appropriated for the 

5 National Park Service to— 

6 (1) study how artificial light affects the move7 ments and behavior of insects; or 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5300 IH

1 (2) develop or test remote sensing technology 

2 that measures distance by illuminating a target with 

3 a laser and analyzing the reflected light for the pur4 pose of determining how artificial light affects the 

5 movements and behavior of insects. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Lloyd SUMMERALL, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2576

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Competitive Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henri Hornby, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Henri Hornby                                                  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Henri Hornby, Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|

|   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|--------|------------------------------|

|   | May 8, 2007 |
|--------|-------------|
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Eric Erdman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment to Annual Report of Genesis Microchip Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Genesis Microchip Inc.



By:

/s/    ERIC ERDMANEric Erdman Interim Chief Executive Officer; Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Genesis Microchip Inc. and will be retained by Genesis Microchip Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5155 

To establish a grant program to assist dislocated miners in receiving additional training and education to enable them to find and secure new 

jobs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2016 

Mr. JENKINS of West Virginia (for himself, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. WELCH, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To establish a grant program to assist dislocated miners 

in receiving additional training and education to enable 

them to find and secure new jobs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assisting America’s 

5 Dislocated Miners Act of 2016’’. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5155 IH

1 SEC. 2. MULTISTATE DISLOCATED MINERS ASSISTANCE 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established within 

4 the Employment and Training Administration of the De5 partment of Labor a Dislocated Miners Assistance Pro6 gram that shall contract with comprehensive career cen7 ters to— 

8 (1) identify miners who have been dislocated 

9 from their employment in mining jobs across the 

10 United States; 

11 (2) assess the needed skills, training, and edu12 cation of such miners to enable them to find and 

13 hold new jobs; 

14 (3) identify job training programs that would 

15 provide such training and education; and 

16 (4) provide grants to eligible job training pro17 viders, pursuant to subsection (b), to recruit and 

18 train such miners and assist them in finding new 

19 employment. 

20 (b) JOB TRAINING GRANTS FOR DISLOCATED WORK21 ERS.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—From amounts appropriated 

23 pursuant to paragraph (3), the Secretary of Labor 

24 shall award grants to eligible job training providers 

25 and comprehensive career centers to recruit and 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5155 IH

1 train dislocated miners and assist them in finding 

2 new employment. 

3 (2) ELIGIBLE COMPREHENSIVE CAREER CEN4 TERS AND JOB TRAINING PROVIDERS.—A com5 prehensive career center or job training provider eli6 gible to receive a grant under this Act shall be a 

7 nonprofit organization with demonstrated success co8 ordinating or providing necessary training and edu9 cation to workers dislocated from the mining indus10 try, to enable such workers to acquire marketable 

11 skills to find and hold jobs in the workforce in areas 

12 where such miners and their families live. 

13 (3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

14 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec15 retary of Labor for each of fiscal years 2017 

16 through 2021, $20,000,000 to award grants pursu17 ant to this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0041 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERIC D. YEATON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 21 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2020

07/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0041
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

          - 49 CFR Parts 172 and 178
          - [Docket No. PHMSA-2007-29245 (HM-244)]
          - RIN 2137-AE30

      ( print page 59146)    

### Correction

In rule document E7-19138 beginning on page 55678 in the issue of Monday, October 1, 2007, make the following corrections:

§ 172.101

1. On page 55690, in § 172.101, in the table, in the last row, in the seventh column, “None” should read “....”.

2. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same row, in the eighth column, “62” should read “None”.

3. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same row, in the ninth column, “None” should read “62”.

4. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same row, in the 10th column, “Forbidden” should read “None”.

5. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same row, in the 12th column, “08” should read “Forbidden”.

6. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same row, in the 13th column, “8E, 14E, 15E, 17E” should read “08”.

7. On the same page, in the same section, in the same table, in the same row, the 14th column should read “8E, 14E, 15E, 17E”.

§ 178.348-4

8. On page 55696, in § 178.348-4(d)(3), in the second column, in the first line, 

C = 520[K(2/(K+1))[(K+1)/(K−1)]]0.5

should read

                    C = 520[K(2/(K+1))[(K+1)/(K−1)]                    ]0.5                    .                

[FR Doc. Z7-19138 Filed 10-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
##### 



GENESIS MICROCHIP INCORPORATED
 2001 NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN
as amended on June 8, 2007
 Purposes of the Plan
 
    
    to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of
substantial responsibility,
    
    to provide additional incentive to Employees, Directors and Consultants, and
    
    to promote the success of the Companys business.
  Definitions
 Administrator
 Applicable Laws
 Board
 Change in Control




---



##### 



Code
 Committee
 Common Stock
 Company
 Consultant
 Director
 Disability
 Employee
 Exchange Act
 Fair Market Value
 The Wall Street Journal




---



##### 



The Wall Street Journal
  Notice of Grant
 Officer
 Option
 Option Agreement
 Option Exchange Program
 Optioned Stock
 Optionee
 Parent
 Plan
 Service Provider
 Share
 Subsidiary




---



##### 



Stock Subject to the Plan
  Administration of the Plan
 Administration
 Powers of the Administrator




---



##### 



Effect of Administrators Decision
 Eligibility
 Limitation
 Term of Plan
 Term of Option




---



##### 



Option Exercise Price and Consideration
 Exercise Price
 Waiting Period and Exercise Dates
 Form of Consideration
         Exercise of Option
 Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Shareholder




---



##### 



Termination of Relationship as a Service Provider
 Disability of Optionee
 Death of Optionee




---



##### 



Buyout Provisions
 Non-Transferability of Options
 Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution, Merger or Asset Sale
 Changes in Capitalization
 Dissolution or Liquidation
 Merger or Asset Sale




---



##### 



Outside Director Options
 Date of Grant
 Amendment and Termination of the Plan
 Amendment and Termination
 Effect of Amendment or Termination




---



##### 



Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares
  Investment Representations
 Inability to Obtain Authority
 Reservation of Shares
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Luis Perez Hernandez Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 4,650.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 0.00

Balance Due $ 4,650.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

October 20, 2021 /s/ Diego G. Mendez

Date Diego G. Mendez 52748

Signature of Attorney

MENDEZ LAW OFFICES

P.O. BOX 228630

Miami, FL 33222

305-264-9090 Fax: 1-305-809-8474

INFO@MENDEZLAWOFFICES.COM

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-20068-AJC Doc 4 Filed 10/20/21 Page 1 of 1
September 14, 1967

Honorable Joe C. Moore, Chairman Texas Water Quality Board Austin, Texas Opinion No. M-131 Re: Authority of the Texas Water Quality Board to adopt water quality rules and to enforce such rules, DearMr. MoQre: ! : Youhave requested our opiciou as to whether the Texas Water Quality Board (created by S.B. ,204! Acts 60th Leg. g.6. 1967; p. 749; Art. 76218-1, V.C.S’.)‘San adopt rules ‘and’rrgulations as to water’quality~ andenforce said rules and regulations. Youstate that the Texas Water’Pollution Control Board (created by,Art. 762ld, V.C.S.), the predecessor of the Texas Water Quality Board did adoptwater quality criteria by its order 67-S. dated June 30, 1967 and that such are nowunder review by the U.S. Departmentof Interior. Federal lawprovides that the States must adopt water quality standards andprovide for the enforcement thereof or the United States Governmentpill.act through its Secretary of Interior and “shall promulgate s,uchstandards.” 33U.S.C.A. 466, et seq. Youdesire answers to the following questions: (1) Whether the State Water Pollution Control Board had legal authority to adopt water quality standards? If so, please give citations for the authority. (2) Whether the State Water Pollution Control Board had legal authority to enforce water quality standards? 1,fso, please give citations for the authority. (3) Whether the Texas Water Pollution Control Board took action, by resolution or otherwise, to adopt andprovide for the enforcement of water quality standards? (4) Whether the newTexas Water Quality Board has legal authority to enforce water quality standards7 If so, please give citations for the authority.



# -609 -Honorable Joe G.Moore, Page 2 (M-131) Your first three questions are answered In the afflmative, The State Water Pollution Control Board not only could, but euch State agency did, makevalid rules and regulations andprovide far enforcement thereof under the authority of Article 7621d, Sec. 4(c), 4(d), 4(e), andSec. 12, V.C.S. As to question number (4), there is ample authority for the Texas Water Quality Board to enter an order promulgating andadopting the rules of its predecessor State agency; and the Texas Water Quality Act of 1967, effective September 1, 1967, provides for injunctions, civil penalties and criminal prosecutions to enforce the law. S.B. 204, Chapter 313, Acts 60th Legislature, R.S. 1967, Art. 7621d-1, Sections 11 and 15, V.C.S. gUMMARY

TheState Water Pollution Control Board had.legal authority, to adopt and enforce water control stand its order onJune 30. 1967,did adopt water quali andprovided for the enforcement thereof. Iida andby criteria &tic1 7621d. Sets. 4(c), 4(d). 4(e), andSection 12, V.C.S. TheTexas Water Quality Board has legal authority to enforce water quality standards. tjectlons 11 and 15of Artiole 7621d-1, V.C.S. Ver/ypuly yours,

Prepared by Roger Tyler Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION

COMMITTEE HawthornePhillips, Chairman Kerns B. Taylor, Co-Chairman W.V. Geppert Lewis Berry Linward Shivers Pat Bailey

-

# 610 -