alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 25, 2000 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 25, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-25-2000
<CASH>                                          18,458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,031
<INVENTORY>                                     32,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,774
<PP&E>                                         119,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 400,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,793
<BONDS>                                        312,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,158)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   400,947
<SALES>                                         69,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,302
<CGS>                                           41,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,043
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,126
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company's equity is not publicly stated.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 67 (Friday, April 5, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30405]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36920; International Series Release No. 945; File No. 
SR-CBOE-96-09]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
Change and Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board 
Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to the Listing and Trading of Options 
on the Mexican Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones

Correction

    In notice document 96-5785, beginning on page 10043 in the issue of 
Tuesday, March 12, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 10045, in the first column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as set forth below:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Response of fish assemblages to declining acidic deposition in Adirondack Mountain lakes, 1984–2012      

      December 1, 2016    

Adverse effects of acidic deposition on the chemistry and fish communities were evident in Adirondack Mountain lakes during the 1980s and 1990s. Fish assemblages and water chemistry in 43 Adirondack Long-Term Monitoring (ALTM) lakes were sampled by the Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation during three periods (1984–87, 1994–2005, and 2008–12) to document regional impacts and potential biological recovery associated with the 1990 amendments to the 1963 Clean Air Act (CAA). We assessed standardized data from 43 lakes sampled during the three periods to quantify the response of fish-community richness, total fish abundance, and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) abundance to declining acidity that resulted from changes in U.S. air-quality management between 1984 and 2012. During the 28-year period, mean acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) increased significantly from 3 to 30 μeq/L and mean inorganic monomeric Al concentrations decreased significantly from 2.22 to 0.66 μmol/L, yet mean species richness, all species or total catch per net night (CPNN), and brook trout CPNN did not change significantly in the 43 lakes. Regression analyses indicate that fishery metrics were not directly related to the degree of chemical recovery and that brook trout CPNN may actually have declined with increasing ANC. While the richness of fish communities increased with increasing ANC as anticipated in several Adirondack lakes, observed improvements in water quality associated with the CAA have generally failed to produce detectable shifts in fish assemblages within a large number of ALTM lakes. Additional time may simply be needed for biological recovery to progress, or else more proactive efforts may be necessary to restore natural fish assemblages in Adirondack lakes in which water chemistry is steadily recovering from acidification.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Barry P Baldigo

##### Research Biologist (RGE)

New York Water Science Center

bbaldigo@usgs.gov

518-285-5605

## Related Content

#### Barry P Baldigo

##### Research Biologist (RGE)

New York Water Science Center

bbaldigo@usgs.gov

518-285-5605

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New York Water Science Center          

425 Jordan RoadTroy, NY12180-8349United States

dc_ny@usgs.gov

(518) 285-5695 

(518) 285-5601

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - adirondacks
                  - New York

View All **
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Community Bancorp Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-88455, 333-88457, and 333-88473) on Form S-8 of Fallbrook National
Bank of our report dated January 13, 1999, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of Community Bancorp Inc. and subsidiary (formerly Fallbrook
National Bank) as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-KSB
of Community Bancorp Inc.

                                              KPMG LLP

San Diego, California
March 29, 2000
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(28)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - (-)oklahoma(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        July 25, 2019        Climate Projections as a Way to Illustrate Future Possibilities

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DYLAN T. FAIRCLOTH, Petitioner

v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 533 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 31st day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED and the Application for Supersedeas Pending Appeal is DENIED
.
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division

In re Auchter, Richard Alan Case No. 21-19085-EPK

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 4,500.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 0.00

Balance Due $ 4,500.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law

firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Plus $313 filing fee, $15 for Pre- Consumer Credit Counseling fees, $10 Post Credit Counseling Fee Courses,

$75 Credit Report retrieval fee, and other estimated expenses of $150 as prescribed by the guidelines for

compensation for professional services or reimbursement of expenses by Attorneys for Ch 13 Debtors.

Pursuant to Local Rule 2016-1(B)(2)(a).

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Adversary proceedings and Depositions.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

October 5, 2021 /s/ Chad Van Horn

Date Chad Van Horn

Signature of Attorney

Van Horn Law Group, P.A.

330 N Andrews Ave Ste 450

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1012

(954) 765-3166 Fax: (954) 756-7103

chad@cvhlawgroup.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 2021 CINGroup - www.cincompass.com

Case 21-19085-EPK Doc 13 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 1
Luis IBARRA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sean FLEMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2612

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Felton Bernard GREEN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3993

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I ArnoldHantman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Arnold Hantman        Arnold Hantman     Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 8, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

65636

Vol. 63, No. 228

Friday, November 27, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EL99-3-000, et al.]

MidAmerican Energy Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

Correction

In notice document 98–31110,

beginning on page 64694, in the issue of

Monday, November 23, 1998, the docket

number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD01-98-125]

RIN 2115-AE46

Special Local Regulations: Greenwood

Lake Powerboat Classic, Greenwood

Lake, New Jersey

Correction

In proposed rule document 98–30446,

beginning on page 63426, in the issue of

Friday, November 13, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 63426, in the third column,

under DATES, in the second line

‘‘January 12, 1998’’ should read

‘‘January 12, 1999’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

March 22, 2016

Bradford Colton 

Research Engineer 

Halotron Division 

American Pacific Corporation 

3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 700 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP Submission for 2-Bromo-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene (2-

BTP) in Fire Suppression

Dear Mr. Colton:

Thank you for American Pacific Corporation’s submission to the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program, which implements section 612 of the 

Clean Air Act. Your submission received on December 3, 2013, and the additional information 

subsequently submitted have been reviewed for completeness. We have determined your submission 

to be complete. Information concerning your submission is as follows:

Substitute name: 2-BTP

Substance(s) the substitute will replace: Halon 1211 and Halon 1301

Sector: Fire Suppression

End-uses: Streaming for hand-held extinguishers on aircraft and Total Flooding for engine nacelles 

and auxiliary power units on aircraft

Date received: December 3, 2013

Date most recent information received: August 27, 2015

Status of submission: Complete

Your submission was complete as of March 7, 2016. You may sell or import in the United States in 

the fire suppression end-uses listed above as of June 5, 2016, pending EPA’s final decision. Please 

note that this is not the same as a determination that the substitute is acceptable; such a final 

determination can only be made in a notice or rule published in the Federal Register. If you have 

questions about your submission, please contact me at (202) 343-9749 or maranion.bella@epa.gov.

Sincerely,

Bella A. Maranion 

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

Stratospheric Protection Division
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Reinaldo Martinez 21-13097 RAM 5/6/21 ✔ Photo ID - Legible/Unredacted Missing 2016(B) IVL Valuation motion not filed ✔ Creditor acct no. does not match POC#4 ✔

✔ #8761 (3/20-3/31/21) ✔ 3/18 & 3/19 $1000 ✔

✔ Affidavit of support LF 90 LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity✔ Missing completed and signed copy of the Written Quest. to Debtor(s)

Case 21-13097-RAM Doc 21 Filed 05/17/21 Page 1 of 1
*

 After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and

judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of

orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the

terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUN 9 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

ROOSEVELT SPENCER McCOY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

TOM C. MARTIN, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 98-6110

(D.C. No. 97-CV-673)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, EBEL and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-appellant Roosevelt Spencer McCoy (“McCoy”) was convicted

by a jury in Oklahoma state court of possession with intent to distribute cocaine

and was sentenced to fifty-years imprisonment. McCoy filed a pro se petition

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on April 24, 1997, to vacate, set aside, or correct the

sentence imposed upon him. In his petition, McCoy argued insufficiency of the
- 2 -

evidence, improper jury instructions, improper state sentence/excessive

punishment, Fourth Amendment violations, and ineffective assistance of counsel. 

The district court denied McCoy’s habeas petition on February 27, 1998.

Because McCoy filed his § 2254 petition on April 24, 1997, one year after

the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

("AEDPA"), 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2254-66 (1996), the AEDPA provision requiring a

certificate of appealability applies to McCoy's appeal. The district court denied a

certificate of appealability in an order dated April 1, 1998. In that same order,

the district court denied McCoy’s request for In Forma Pauperis status under 28

U.S.C. § 1915. McCoy now appeals the district court’s order. Finding no

substantial showing of the denial of an important federal right or any other reason

justifying further proceedings, we hereby deny a certificate of appealability. As a

result, because we find that the appeal does not present a reasoned, nonfrivolous

argument on appeal, we also deny McCoy’s motion for In Forma Pauperis status.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel

Circuit Judge
**Exhibit 12.1**
**Mediacom Broadband LLC**
Schedule of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and PreferredDividends                                         **Inception**                   **(April 5,**                   **2001) through**   **For the years ended December 31,** **December 31,**   **2005** **2004** **2003** **2002** **2001**                   **(in thousands, except ratio amounts)**    Earnings:                     Income (loss) before income taxes $11,003  $34,852  $10,082  $(27,244) $(50,586) Interest expense, net  97,282   86,125   82,536   76,790   41,430  Amortization of capitalized interest  821   695   503   114   —  Amortization of debt issuance costs  4,600   2,099   2,365   2,248   1,086  Interest component of rent expense(1)  2,289   2,137   2,086   1,687   1,076                  Earnings available for fixed charges $115,995  $125,908  $97,572  $53,595  $(6,994)                 Fixed Charges:                     Interest expense, net $97,282  $86,125  $82,536  $76,790  $41,430  Capitalized interest  1,558   1,270   3,425   4,056   308  Amortization of debt issuance costs  4,600   2,099   2,365   2,248   1,086  Interestcomponent of rentexpense(1)  2,289   2,137   2,086   1,687   1,076  Preferred dividends  18,000   18,000   18,000   18,000   8,120                  Total fixed charges $123,729  $109,631  $108,412  $102,781  $52,020                  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges andpreferred dividends  —   1.15   —   —   —                  Deficiency of earnings over fixed charges $(7,734) $—  $(10,840) $(49,186) $(59,014)                 
(1) A reasonable approximation (one-third) is deemed to be the interest factorincluded in rental expense.
78