alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of United EcoEnergy Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William K. Mackey, Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William K. Mackey
---------------------------
William K. Mackey
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

slideshow        July 20, 2023        Planetary Science at the USGS

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - (-)mississippi(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileBrian T. Lamb, Ph.D.
Jennifer SMALL, Appellant, v. Jason SMALL, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10331]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 15225]]



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 96-36]


Yu-To Hsu, M.D., Denial of Application

Correction

    In notice document 97-6793 beginning on page 12840 in the issue of 
Tuesday, March 18, 1997, make the following correction:
     On page 12842 in the second column, before the FR document, the 
signature line was omitted and should have appeared as follows:
James S. Milford,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Willie KIRKLAND, a/k/a Willie Jaquan Kirkland, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,255                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           477                      30
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,732)                    (30)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,345                     245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,345)                   (245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,345)                   (245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,345)                   (245)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0





</TABLE>
Luis Angel PEREZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
 Dated:
      May 14, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Liu BoLiu
      BoChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-50427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-14]


Proposed Amendment to Class E Airspace; Lawrence, KS; Perryville, 
MO; Warrensburg, MO; Burlington, IA; Des Moines, IA; Fort Madison, IA; 
and Dubuque, IA

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-7825, beginning on page 14388, in the 
issue of Wednesday, March 25, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 14389, in Sec. 71.1, in the third column, ``ACE 81 E5 Fort 
Madison, IA'' should read ``ACE IA E5 Fort Madison, IA''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: AnalogousFeatures

Filters

              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - (-)hawaii(1)

## By Year

Photography        February 16, 1991        Cinder Cones on Mauna Kea
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20509]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-60252; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2009-24]

### Correction

In notice document E9-16545 beginning on page 34067 in the issue of Tuesday, July 14, 2009, make the following correction:

On page 34067, in the first column, the docket number should read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. Z9-16545 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 99.2


     Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President
        and Secretary of GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables 2002-1, L.L.C.
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Secretary of GreatAmerica
Leasing Receivables 2002-1, L.L.C. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the eight
months ended May 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.




/s/ Stan Herkelman

------------------------------------
Stan Herkelman
August 28, 2002
Daniel Richard EICHOLTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2607

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Titl e 

# ^ ^ - ^1^ ^ Tioi^ml Withrespec t

t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) ; 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s of sectio n6(a)(3)(E ) of

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee nme t inaccordanc e wit hth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

/ \Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio ni s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t fo r th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee nme t i naccordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

\ / ( Thi s documen t i s no t afina l rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee nsubmitte dt o C-5 0 fo r transmissio nt o Congres s an dGAO . 

# ^\ic(Mti^J2^l%udx^f ^ 

# 1 Signatur e 

### ^^^p6P^^ Y A^^'^'^*^ ^ (fcne^rct j (ioUy^S^ l /^ ^ Title/Offic e Dat e / /

// ^ // /

05/26/201 1
Kenneth Lee BELVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-0578 4D17-0579

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Daniel Albert STANDARD, Appellant, v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM and Tara Lynn Curtis, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2231

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 3, 2018

Daniel Albert Standard, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Carrie R. McNair, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges on appeal the Department of Revenue's administrative paternity and support order, entered in proceedings under sections 409.256 and 409.2563, Florida Statutes. Appellant seeks judicial review of the administrative order pursuant to sections 409.256(12) and 409.2563(10)(a).

Because Appellant failed to participate in the administrative proceedings by returning the forms for financial information supplied him by the Department and failed to request an administrative hearing after notice of his right to do so and the consequences for failing to do so, Appellant has not preserved any issue for this Court's appellate review. By waiving his right to a hearing, Appellant waived his ability to *799challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Department's determination of his child support obligations. *See* § 409.2563(7)(b), Fla. Stat.

Even if Appellant had preserved any issues for appellate review, the grounds he asserts for setting aside the administrative order would have no merit. We are required to affirm final agency action unless Appellant shows a ground for setting such action aside, as provided by section 120.68, Florida Statutes. § 120.68(8), Fla. Stat. Appellant fails to establish any of the statutory grounds. His assertion of an agreement with the child's mother that no retroactive child support is owed is legally irrelevant because parents may not contract away or waive the rights of their child for support. *Lancaster v. Lancaster* , 228 So.3d 1197, 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Accordingly, the administrative paternity and support order is

AFFIRMED .

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re:

ALBERTO SOLAR SOMOHANO

Debtor.

__________________________________________/

Case No. 20-22697-BKC-AJC

Chapter 7

ALBERTO SOLER

Plaintiff,

v.

United States 45th Administration, et al.

Defendants

_________________________________________/

Adversary No. 21-01054-AJC

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on August 17, 2021 upon the Motion to Dismiss 

Amended Complaint with Prejudice [DE 82](the “Motion”) filed by Defendant, MIAMI-DADE 

COUNTY (the “County”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), made applicable 

to this proceeding by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012; and which Motion joined in the 

Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Judge Michael Hanzman and 3rd DCA [DE 32] and the 

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 17, 2021.

Case 21-01054-AJC Doc 135 Filed 08/18/21 Page 1 of 2
2 | Page

Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Robertson Anschutz & Schneid-Crane-Partners and 

Kondaur Capital, LLC [DE 11]. The Court having reviewed the County’s Motion, the grounds 

therefore, the Plaintiff’s failure to object to dismissal, Plaintiffs’ failure to appear at the hearing, 

coupled with the record of this proceeding, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the County’s Motion is GRANTED; and

The instant proceeding is DISMISSED with prejudice. This proceeding shall be closed upon entry 

of this Order. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enter orders necessary to enforce this Order. The 

Court also reserves jurisdiction to assess attorney’s fees and costs, if applicable, upon proper 

motion and hearing.

###

Copies furnished to:

Debtor

Trustee

AUST

Case 21-01054-AJC Doc 135 Filed 08/18/21 Page 2 of 2
Webinar Attendees: Test Procedures for Microwave Ovens (Active Mode)Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2013Name Title Organization Street CityStateZip Phone Fax EmailDommu, Jeremy Project Manager U. S. Department of Energy 1000 IndependenceAvenue, SWWashington DC 20585 202-586-9870 202-586-4617 Jeremy.Dommu@ee.doe.govNold, Craig M. Platform ManagerAppliances - MWOGE Consumer & Industrial Appliance ParkAP2-126Louisville KY 40225 502-452-4014 502-479-6661 Craig.Nold@ge.comSharp, Mark J. Group ManagerCorporate EnvironmentalDepartmentPanasonic Corporation of NorthAmerica1130 Connecticut Avenue,NW,Suite 1100Washington DC 20036 202-912-3800x 116202-912-3810 mark.sharp@us.panasonic.comSwink, Matthew Paralegal Specialist U.S. Department of JusticeAntitrust Division450 Fifth Street NWSuite 8000Washington DC 20530 202-514-0986 202-616-2441 mateoswink@hotmail.comVazquez, George Engineer Panasonic 5201 Tollview Drive RollingMeadowsIL 60008 N/A N/A george.vazquez.@us.panasonic.com
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARL HARRISON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-143, CA-00-792) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* To the extent that Harrison raises claims in his informal brief that were not presented to the district court, we note that he cannot raise them for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). 2 PER CURIAM: Carl Harrison seeks to appeal the district court’s orders (1) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001); and (2) denying his motion for remission of his fine. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and the district court’s order denying his motion for remission of his fine, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Harrison, Nos. CR-97-143; CA-00- 792 (S.D.W. Va Aug. 13 & Sept. 4, 2001). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered April 10, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01267-CR

DEAN ALAN MATTHEWS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 207th District Court

Comal County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR2016-544

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s April 8, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file 

its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on or before May 10, 2019.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
Wayne J. MENDOZA, Sr. v. Lisa Allen MENDOZA

NO. 2018-C-1138

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICEWEB, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.           The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  May 16, 2011  By:  /s/ John R. SignorelloJohn R. SignorelloChief Executive Officer, principal executive officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
William Reshawn COPELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3944

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SERVED: JULY 9, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

KENNETH SANTODOMINGO 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0407 · 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

. NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013SW050046) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding. this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearin.g 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

cz~- Chief Administrative La 

Attachment - Service List 
t 

SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

Kenneth Santodomingo, Respondent 

Reg. No. 45762-177 

P.O. Box 9000 

Seagoville, TX 75159-9000 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Lander, Complainant's Counsel 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5083 

FAX: 817-222-5945 

Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.R (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0407 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2