alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5047 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5047

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 1, 2016

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Labor 
  to provide information to veterans and members of the Armed Forces 
about articulation agreements between institutions of higher learning, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Veterans' Educational 
Choice Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROVISION OF INFORMATION ON 
              ARTICULATION AGREEMENTS BETWEEN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER 
              LEARNING.

    (a) Information.--Department of Veterans Affairs counselors who 
provide educational or vocational counseling services pursuant to 
section 3697A of title 38, United States Code, shall provide to any 
eligible individual who requests such counseling services information 
about the articulation agreements of each institution of higher 
learning in which the veteran is interested.
    (b) Certification of Eligibility.--When the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs provides to a veteran a certification of eligibility for 
educational assistance provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
the Secretary shall also include detailed information on such 
educational assistance, including information on requesting education 
counseling services and on articulation agreements.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``institution of higher learning'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 3452(f) of title 38, United 
        States Code.
            (2) The term ``articulation agreement'' has the meaning 
        given such term in section 486A of the Higher Education Act of 
        1965 (Public Law 89-329; 20 U.S.C. 1093a).
    (d) Deadline for Implementation.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall implement this section not later than 90 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of General Components, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Jonathan Chan,  Chief Financial  Officer  (Principal  Financial  Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      i)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                     /s/ Jonathan Chan
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Jonathan Chan
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     (Principal Financial Officer)
                                     April 28, 2006

This  Certification  is made  solely for  purposes  of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.  This written  statement shall not be deemed to be "filed" as part
of the annual report on Form 10-KSB that it accompanies.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: K.T.W.E.

PETITION OF: A.S., NATURAL MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 344 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of January, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 167 (Friday, August 28, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 46102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20828]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 167 / Friday, August 28, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 46102]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 213

[Docket No. RST-90-1, Notice No. 8]
RIN 2130-AA75


Track Safety Standards

Correction

    In rule document 98-15932 beginning on page 33992 in the issue of 
Monday, June 22, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 33993, in the second column, in the first full 
paragraph, in the ninth line, ``It's'' should read ``Its''.

PART 213--[CORRECTED]

    2. On page 34029, in the first column, in the table of contents, 
``6213.4'' should read ``213.4''.


Sec. 213.109  [Corrected]

    3. On page 34034, in the third column, in Sec. 213.109(e)(4), in 
the third line, before ``this'' add ``('' and in the fourth line after 
``2000.'' add ``)''.
    4. On page 34035, in Sec. 213.109(f), in the text under the first 
and second illustrations, ``joins'' should read ``joint''.


Sec. 213.119  [Corrected]

    5. On page 34037, in the first column, in Sec. 213.119 introductory 
text, in the ninth line, ``December'' should read ``March''.


Sec. 231.329  [Corrected]

    6. On page 34044, in Sec. 213.329(b)(1), the equation in the first 
column should be in the third column, and the equation in the third 
column should be in the first column. The related text is correctly 
placed.


Sec. 213.333  [Corrected]

    7. On page 34046, in Sec. 213.333, in the table, in the ``Safety 
limit''column, in the second line, ``<ls-thn-eq>tan<greek-d> - .5 1 + 
.5tan<greek-d>'' should read ``<ls-thn-eq>tan<greek-d> - .5 <divide> 1 
+ .5tan<greek-d>''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## NUMBER 13
- 1 2
- 00 269
- CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. W., A CHILD

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 3 2 9th District Court of Wharton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides , Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, M. W

. 1 , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 3 2 9th
District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause number 45,492 . Appellant has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appell ant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

1 In appeals from cases involving the termination of parental rights, the rules of appellate procedure require the use of an alias to refer to a minor, A and if necessary to protect the minor ’ s identity, to the minor ’ s parent or other family member. ” Tex. R. App. P. 9.8.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Del ivered and filed the 31st day of May , 201 2

.
CGFD30 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 30, 2023

Robert A Mark

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 22−10385−RAM

Chapter: 11

In re: Debtor(s) name(s) and address(es) (for names include married, maiden and trade used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years)

6200 NE 2nd Avenue, LLC

300 NE 71st Street

Miami, FL 33138

EIN: 47−2243004

FINAL DECREE

A Final Report and Motion for Entry of Final Decree having been filed on behalf of the debtor, this chapter

11 case is closed. If applicable, all future payments under the plan of reorganization shall be disbursed in

accordance with the plan.

# # # 

The clerk shall serve a copy of this Final Decree on the Debtor, Attorney for Debtor, and the U.S. Trustee

Case 22-10385-RAM Doc 549 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 1
CGFD47 (12/1/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−20206−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Annetta McCalla

1251 NW 51 Ave.

Lauderhill, FL 33313

SSN: xxx−xx−1546

Curtis McNeal

1251 NW 51 Ave.

Lauderhill, FL 33313

SSN: xxx−xx−2479

NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO COMPLETE A POSTPETITION

INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE CONCERNING PERSONAL FINANCIAL

MANAGEMENT AND SUBMIT PROOF OF COMPLETION

OF THE COURSE TO THE COURT

 Notice is given that, subject to limited exceptions, a debtor (both debtors in a joint case) must

complete an instructional course in personal financial management in order to receive a discharge under

chapter 7 [11 U.S.C. §727(a)(11)], under chapter 13 [11 U.S.C. §1328(g)(1)] or, in certain individual

chapter 11 cases where 11 U.S.C. §1141(d)(3) applies. Proof of completion of the course must be

submitted to the court by either the debtor or the course provider on behalf of the debtor.

DEBTOR AND DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT:

 If the course provider has not filed a certificate with the court directly indicating that the debtor has

completed the course, the debtor must file the "Certification About a Financial Management Course",

(Official Bankruptcy Form 423):

 In a chapter 7 case: within 60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under §341.

[See Bankruptcy Rules 1007(b)(7)(A) and (c).]

 In a chapter 13 case: no later than the date of the last payment made as required by the plan or the

filing of a motion for entry of a discharge under §1328(b). [See Bankruptcy Rules 1007(b)(7)(A) and (c).]

 In a chapter 11 individual case where 11 U.S.C. §1141(d)(3) applies: prior to completion of all

payments under the confirmed plan. [See Bankruptcy Rules 1007(b)(7)(B) and (c).]

 This requirement must be met before a discharge can be entered in this case. [See Bankruptcy Rule

4004(c)(1)(H) and Local Rule 4004−3(A).]

 Failure to file the Official Bankruptcy Form 423 certification form, unless the course provider files a

certificate on your behalf, may result in the case being closed without an entry of discharge.

 If the debtor subsequently files a motion to reopen the case to permit the filing of the Official

Bankruptcy Form 423, the debtor must pay the filing fee due for reopening the case. [See Local Rules

4006−1 and 5010−1(G).]

 A list of approved providers of Personal Financial Management Courses is available at:

http://www.justice.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/de_approved.htm [see 11 U.S.C. §111]

Dated: 12/27/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: admin

Deputy Clerk

The clerk shall serve a copy of this notice on the Debtor and Attorney for the Debtor

Case 21-20206-PDR Doc 26 Filed 12/27/21 Page 1 of 1
STATE EX REL. Willie THOMAS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0835

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

*1089Denied; moot. R.S. 15:574.4(H).
EXHIBIT 99.4
                                                                    ------------

                                      * * *


     In connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for
the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





                                          /s/ James C. Fields
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          James C. Fields
                                          Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                          April 30, 2003
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           U-Pb isotopic characteristics of lunar meteorites Yamato-793274 and Yamato-86032      

      January 1, 1991    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Wayne Premo

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

wpremo@usgs.gov

303-236-7686

## Related Content

#### Wayne Premo

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

wpremo@usgs.gov

303-236-7686

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - moon

View All **
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00029-CR

______________________________

STACIE LYNN OLIVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 3rd Judicial District Court

Anderson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29272

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court 1

by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX.GOV'T CODE ANN.

§ 73.001 (Vernon 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court

of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.

2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Stacie Lynn Oliver has appealed from the adjudication of her guilt for the offense of forgery.

The trial court sentenced her to two years' confinement in a state jail facility.1

On appeal, Oliver contends that her sentence is disproportionate to the crime, citing, among

other cases, Fluellen v. State, 71 S.W.3d 870 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, pet. ref'd), and Latham

v. State, 20 S.W.3d 63 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, pet. ref'd). To preserve such a complaint for

appellate review, Oliver must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion

that stated the specific grounds for the desired ruling, or the complaint must be apparent from the

context. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a)(1); Harrison v. State, 187 S.W.3d 429, 433 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005); Williams v. State, 191 S.W.3d 242, 262 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, no pet.) (claims of cruel

and unusual punishment must be presented in timely manner); Nicholas v. State, 56 S.W.3d 760, 768

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd) (failure to complain to trial court that sentences

were cruel and unusual waived claim of error for appellate review). We have reviewed the records

of the trial proceeding. No relevant request, objection, or motion was made. And, while this Court

has held that a motion for new trial is an appropriate way to preserve this type of claim for review

(see Williamson v. State, 175 S.W.3d 522, 523–24 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.), and
3

Delacruz v. State, 167 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.)), no motion for new trial

was filed. Thompson has not preserved such an issue for appeal.

There being no other issues before us, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 7, 2009

Date Decided: May 8, 2009

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(Subsections (a) and (b) of § 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of § 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Molecular Imaging Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 (the “Form 10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company. 

 

|                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ PAUL J. CROWE                                                     |   |   |        |
|                                                                       |   |   |   |
| **Paul J. Crowe, Chairman, President and****Chief Executive Officer** |   |   |   |
| Dated: May 15, 2003                                                   |   |   |   |

 

|                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ THOMAS H. INSLEY                          |   |   |        |
|                                               |   |   |   |
| **Thomas H. Insley, Chief Financial Officer** |   |   |   |
| Dated: May 15, 2003                           |   |   |   |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of § 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1872 Prepped by Keeia Richards

Document

Number: 

# 135 ) 11-1-18

8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/26/20088:52:04 AM

Sheet 135of 204P. 2

" - \ 

### A-90-1 9 11-1-18 8 

## AI RTOXIC S an d VOCs ; Market s an d Technolog y fo rComplianc e Analysis , Control Technology , an d Measurement A Market Researc h Repor t 

## VOLUM E I Analysi s an

d Forecas t otf \ 8 1 * Prepare d By \ ^fi&S ^ 

### Th e McIIvain

e Company-- - - """""

^ *RSf6iTt *W. MclCvainc Christine tftnnig S\(pa *Bagga Lynn Isaacson Salty MdCderman Joseph. Schwartz
Octobe r 199 1


## TH E IcILVAI N 

# mr u COMPAN

Y 297 0 BCARI

A AVENUE • NORTHBROOK, ILLINOI S 6006 2 • US A Telephone : 70 8 • 27 2 • 001 0 Telefiuc : 70 8 • 27 2 • 967 3
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 208 / Monday, October 29, 2007 / Corrections 61215 

TABLE 33 TO PART 679.—ANNUAL APPORTIONMENT OF AMENDMENT 80 SPECIES ITAC BETWEEN THE AMENDMENT 80 

AND BSAI TRAWL LIMITED ACCESS SECTORS (EXCEPT YELLOWFIN SOLE)—Continued 

Fishery Management area Year 

Percentage 

of ITAC allocated to 

the Amendment 80 

sector 

Percentage 

of ITAC allocated to 

the BSAI 

trawl limited 

access 

sector 

Rock sole .......................................... BSAI .................................................. All years ............................................ 100 0 

Flathead sole ..................................... BSAI .................................................. All years ............................................ 100 0 

[FR Doc. C7–4358 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Privacy Act of 1974: New System of 

Records 

Correction 

In notice document E7–20848 

beginning on page 60396 in the issue of 

Wednesday, October 24, 2007, make the 

following correction: 

The above document should not have 

printed in the Federal Register of 

Wednesday, October 24, 2007. 

[FR Doc. Z7–20848 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

Notice of Request for Public 

Comments on the Review and 

Renegotiation of the United States–

Israel Agreement on Trade in 

Agricultural Products 

Correction 

In notice document E7–20374 

beginning on page 58688 in the issue of 

Tuesday, October 16, 2007, make the 

following correction: 

On page 58688, in the second column, 

under the ADDRESSES heading, in the 

third line, ‘‘FR0802ustr.eop.gov’’ should 

read ‘‘FR0802@ustr.eop.gov’’. 

[FR Doc. Z7–20374 Filed 10–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Case 21-19657-LMI Doc 48 Filed 02/03/22 Page 1 of 5
Case 21-19657-LMI Doc 48 Filed 02/03/22 Page 2 of 5
Case 21-19657-LMI Doc 48 Filed 02/03/22 Page 3 of 5
Case 21-19657-LMI Doc 48 Filed 02/03/22 Page 4 of 5
Case 21-19657-LMI Doc 48 Filed 02/03/22 Page 5 of 5
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

p1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141581 & (57)(58)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141581 COA: 291355 Wayne CC: 2008-010504-FC FLOYD LEE McMURRAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this C ourt. The motions to

remand are DENIED.
Alan ROBINS a/k/a Alan J. Robins, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee FOR the REGISTERED HOLDERS OF IMH ASSETS CORPORATION, COLLATERALIZED ASSET BACKED BONDS, SERIES 2004-11, Poinciana Town Homes Owners' Association, Inc., and Wachovia Bank, National Bank, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*