alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,098                   3,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                      16
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,419                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,604                   3,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           682                     682
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,922                   2,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,604                   3,382
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,865                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,423                     467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,442                   (467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,442                   (467)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,442                   (467)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .008                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .008                  (.001)






</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, James E. Solomon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TechAlt, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter  (the  registrant's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an quarterly
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

August 15, 2005                        /s/ James E. Solomon
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James E. Solomon
                                       Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Three-dimensional model of the hydrostratigraphy and structure of the area in and around the U.S. Army-Camp Stanley Storage Activity Area, northern Bexar County, Texas      

      September 11, 2014    

View Document

A three-dimensional model of the Camp Stanley Storage Activity area defines and illustrates the surface and subsurface hydrostratigraphic architecture of the military base and adjacent areas to the south and west using EarthVision software. The Camp Stanley model contains 11 hydrostratigraphic units in descending order: 1 model layer representing the Edwards aquifer; 1 model layer representing the upper Trinity aquifer; 6 model layers representing the informal hydrostratigraphic units that make up the upper part of the middle Trinity aquifer; and 3 model layers representing each, the Bexar, Cow Creek, and the top of the Hammett of the lower part of the middle Trinity aquifer. The Camp Stanley three-dimensional model includes 14 fault structures that generally trend northeast/southwest. The top of Hammett hydrostratigraphic unit was used to propagate and validate all fault structures and to confirm most of the drill-hole data. Differences between modeled and previously mapped surface geology reflect interpretation of fault relations at depth, fault relations to hydrostratigraphic contacts, and surface digital elevation model simplification to fit the scale of the model. In addition, changes based on recently obtained drill-hole data and field reconnaissance done during the construction of the model. The three-dimensional modeling process revealed previously undetected horst and graben structures in the northeastern and southern parts of the study area. This is atypical, as most faults in the area are en echelon that step down southeasterly to the Gulf Coast. The graben structures may increase the potential for controlling or altering local groundwater flow.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Chuck Blome

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

cblome@usgs.gov

303-236-1278

#### Allan K Clark

##### Hydrologist

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

akclark@usgs.gov

210-691-9228

## Related Content

#### Chuck Blome

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

cblome@usgs.gov

303-236-1278

#### Allan K Clark

##### Hydrologist

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

akclark@usgs.gov

210-691-9228

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - texas

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)

## By Year

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Request Form

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cuttings Sampling Protocol
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5024 

To amend the Clean Air Act to establish criminal penalties for knowingly 

bypassing, defeating, or rendering inoperative air pollution control parts 

or components in motor vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2016 

Mr. DESAULNIER (for himself, Mr. WELCH, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, and Mr. TED LIEU of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 

in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to establish criminal penalties 

for knowingly bypassing, defeating, or rendering inoperative air pollution control parts or components in motor 

vehicles, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Air and Vehicle 

5 Technology Accountability Act of 2016’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5024 IH

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR KNOWINGLY BYPASS2 ING, DEFEATING, OR RENDERING INOPER3 ATIVE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PARTS OR 

4 COMPONENTS IN MOTOR VEHICLES. 

5 Title II of the Clean Air Act is amended by inserting 

6 after section 205 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7524) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 205A. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 

9 ‘‘Whoever knowingly violates subparagraph (A) or 

10 (B) of section 203(a)(3) shall be fined under title 18, 

11 United States Code, imprisoned not more than 15 years, 

12 or both. The penalties under the preceding sentence are 

13 in addition to any other applicable civil and criminal pen14 alties.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Warmwater fish in small standing waters      

      January 1, 2009    

This chapter describes standardized sampling techniques for routine monitoring and population assessment of warmwater sport and prey fishes in small standing water bodies. Although water temperature regulates growth, survival, and reproduction of fishes, there are no specific criteria that define a warmwater fish community. Dodds (2002) noted that warmwater fish communities tend to be dominated by sunfishes, temperate basses, and catfishes. Perches and pikes are common to coolwater fish communities, and trouts and salmons are characteristic of coldwater fish communities. For this chapter, we focus on species that prefer water temperatures greater than 15°C. Coolwater fishes that are important in small natural lakes or impoundments and not incorporated in other chapters are also included.

As with warmwater fish, there is also no stringent definition of a small standing water body. Small standing waters generally contain less complex habitats and fish communities than large standing waters. For this chapter, an area of 200 ha was selected as the maximum surface area for small standing waters, but surface-area designations may vary regionally. Other than a strict definition based on surface area, the manageability of less complex fish communities in small water bodies along with differences in their physical and limnological characteristics, as described below, help separate them from larger water bodies.

On a broad scale, there are four generic types of small standing water bodies: impoundments (ponds), natural lakes, excavated pits, and dugouts. An impoundment is created by damming a perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral stream in a watershed. A natural lake is a depression in the landscape that gathers water, either by seepage, runoff, direct precipitation, or a combination of sources. An excavated pit results from groundwater seepage into an excavated site that was mined for gravel, sand, rock, or fill for construction. A dugout (referred to as a tank in the Southwest) is created by collection of surface water or well water in an excavated site built for the purpose of watering livestock.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kevin L. Pope, PhD

##### Deputy Chief

Cooperative Research Units

kpope@usgs.gov

571-548-2420

## Related Content

#### Kevin L. Pope, PhD

##### Deputy Chief

Cooperative Research Units

kpope@usgs.gov

571-548-2420

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269
# Appendix 10.13

Table 10-16

Reference 9:

Pages 6 and 8 of "BART Determination for Leland Old s Station Units 1

and 2" in Appendix B of Department BART Determinati on.
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:16 AM

To: 'projects@txpromomedia.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - PromoMEdia LLC

Dear Robert Dodd:  

  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

0272).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•         Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and not consider closed‐set

filming in your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention before the requested response date listed

below.  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 5/7/15.  If you have any

questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,  

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
Ramon E. COLINA, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA DIGESTIVE HEALTH SPECIALISTS, LLP, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5040

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Nathaniel CARTER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 25, 2018

Nathaniel Carter, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The Appellant, Nathaniel Carter, Jr., appeals from an order summarily denying his June 12, 2017, amended postconviction motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the denial of that amended motion without comment. However, the record reflects that one of the Appellant's motions for rehearing1 requested a ruling on the claims in his original rule 3.850 motion. He attached to that motion for rehearing a rule 3.850 motion bearing an institutional mail stamp dated September 29, 2015. Although this motion was not docketed with the trial court, it is considered filed on the date that it was conveyed to prison officials for mailing. *See**Padro-Guerrero v. State* , 123 So.3d 670, 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) ; *Lawson v. State* , 107 So.3d 1228, 1228-29 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). This September 29, 2015, rule 3.850 motion was also referenced in the amended rule 3.850 motion, which expressed the intention to add claims to a pending motion and began numbering its claims at ground five. Under these circumstances, we reverse and remand to permit the trial court to rule on the original rule 3.850 motion. *See**Padro-Guerrero* , 123 So.3d at 671 ; *Molfetto v. State* , 955 So.2d 1153, 1155 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Sinclair v. State* , 959 So.2d 1277, 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED .

Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

1

The Appellant filed two different motions for rehearing on the same date, which may have led the trial court to overlook one of the motions, believing it to be a duplicate.
Aaron Rhashaud IVY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-30825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R10-OAR-2007-0915; FRL-8747-7]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Oregon; 
Salem Carbon Monoxide Nonattainment Area; Designation of Areas for Air 
Quality Planning Purposes

Correction

    In rule document E8-30825 beginning on page 79655 in the issue of 
Tuesday, December 30, 2008, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 79655, in the third column, in the DATES section, in the 
fourth line, ``January 29, 2008'' should read ``January 29, 2009''.


Sec. 81.338  [Corrected]

    2. On page 79661, in Sec.  81.338, in the table ``OREGON--CARBON 
MONOXIDE'', in the ``Date'' column, both instances of ``3/2/08'' should 
read ``3/2/09''

[FR Doc. Z8-30825 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Some results from ModEM3DMT, the freely available OSU 3D MT inversion code      

      October 24, 2017    

At the 3DEM-5 workshop in 2013, we presented a paper entitled "ModEM: developing 3D EM inversion for the masses", outlining our then recent development of a modular system for inversion of EM geophysical data, called ModEM. As promised in that presentation, we made a version of the code that is suitable for 3D modeling and inversion of magnetotelluric data freely available for academic use shortly thereafter. There are now over 250 registered users, of ModEM3DMT from around the globe. To date at least 50 publications cite use of ModEM for 3D inversion of real MT datasets to address diverse problems in applied and basic Earth Science research at a range of scales. Here we present an overview of some of these results, focusing on studies that the authors have been involved in, and are thus most familiar to us. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

## Related Content

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Basset Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Madam Sun Keqing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  November 18, 2008 /s/ Madam Sun Keqing Chief Financial Officer
Maria TELLO, Appellant(s)/petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1272

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, James R. Bond , President, Chief Executive
Officer and a director of Kelso Technologies Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of Kelso Technologies Inc.
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Kelso Technologies Inc.                                                                      

Dated: March 30, 2016

| | /s/
      James R. Bond                                
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | James R. Bond                                          
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and a
      director
| | Kelso Technologies Inc.                                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kelso
Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Kelso Technologies Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---