# #1 Melter

NAIMA/U.S. EPA

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for:



# Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC

Mount Vernon Plant

100 Blackjack Rd.

Mt. Vernon, OH 43050

Project No. 10-3990.12

December 1, 2010

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan 48220

(248) 548-8070

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

## i Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 1 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 2 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the 41 Furnace process

located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC (OC) site in Mount Vernon, Ohio:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test pr ogram fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the

overall results of the emissions test program.

1 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)

2 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

## ii Table I

41 Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission

Rate

(lbs/hr) Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 0.13 0.071 4.7

Organic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 0.0071 0.0038 0.25

Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 0.071 0.038 2.6 September 28 & 29,

2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 0.21 0.11 7.5

Filterable Particulate 1.19 0.64 44.5

Antimony < 1.3E-5 < 7.0E-6 < 4.9E-4

Arsenic 4.6E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3

Beryllium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4

Cadmium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4

Chromium 4.5E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3

Cobalt 1.1E-5 5.6E-6 4.0E-4

Lead 3.4E-5 1.8E-5 1.3E-3

Manganese 1.2E-4 6.2E-5 4.3E-3

Nickel < 1.6E-5 < 8.7E-6 < 6.1E-4 September 29 & 30,

2010

Selenium < 3.3E-5 < 1.7E-5 < 1.2E-3

September 28, 2010 Mercury 2.9E-6 1.6E-6 9.9E-2

September 29 & 30,

2010 Hexavalent Chromium < 2.1E-6 < 1.1E-6 < 7.7E-5

Hydrogen Chloride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1 September 28 & 29,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

## i TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 P ROCESS 

## M ONITORING 

## ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 E XHAUST 

## G AS 

## V ELOCITY



## , M OLECULAR 

## W EIGHT



## , AND 

## M OISTURE 

## C ONTENT 

## .................... 2

3.2 PM AND 

## PM 2.5 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................................... 3

3.3 T OTAL 

## S ELECTED 

## M ETALS 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................ 3

3.4 H G 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................................... 4

3.5 H EXAVALENT 

## C HROMIUM 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ................................. 4

3.6 HF AND 

## HC L 

## C ONCENTRATIONS AND 

## E MISSION 

## R ATES 

## ..................................................... 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel

Table 2 – 41 Furnace Emissi ons Test Program Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampli ng Train Schematic Drawing

Figure 8 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results

Appendix B – Process Data

Appendix C – Field and Computer-G enerated Data Sheets and Notes

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 1 

## 1.0 Introduction

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA)

and its members to a voluntary co llection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production 3 

## as well as for

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing 4 

## . To assist in collecting the agreed upon data,

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was re tained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the 41 Melter process

located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC (OC) site in Mount Vernon, Ohio:

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate ma tter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM 2.5 

## )

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromi um, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and

selenium

• Mercury

• Hexavalent chromium

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on

September 28, 29, and 30, 2010. The test program c onsisted of triplicate emission tests at each

location for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program included

the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation

James Sharp BTEC

Jeff Peitzsch BTEC

Paul Molenda BTEC

John Beach BTEC

Matthew Young BTEC

Dave Jacobs Owens Corning

Truskie Burson-Rager Owens Corning

3 

## Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD)

4 

## Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 2 

## 2.0 Process Description

#41 Furnace is a steel-shelled co ld top electric melter which supplies thermal energy to the

mixed glass batch via resistive heating from under glass electrodes. The furnace is equipped

with a baghouse to control particulate emissions that are created from batch charging and glass

volatiles that “boil” from the surface of the molten glass condensing in the exhaust stream

forming small diameter particulate matter.

2.1 Process Monitoring

During the emissions test program, the el ectric melt furnace wa s operated under normal

conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded

during the emissions test program included baghouse pressure drop and furnace operating

temperature. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control and/or additional

production information will be availa ble to the U.S. EPA on request.

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emi ssions test program can be separated into six

categories as follows:

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, mo lecular weight, and moisture content;

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates;

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates;

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates;

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chro mium concentrations and emission rates;

and,

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates.

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by cate gory are summarized by Sections

3.1 through 3.6, respectively.

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecula r weight, and moisture content was conducted

using the following reference test methods codifi ed at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A):

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points”

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velo city and Volumetric Flowrate”

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in

Emissions from Stationary Sources”( Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 3 

## These test methods were used to evaluate exha ust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate,

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sa mpling methodologies.

Stack gas velocity traverses we re conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions will be within specified limits, therefore, a

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) will be assigned.

Molecular weight was determined ac cording to USEPA Method 3A. The O 2 

## content of the

exhaust gas was measured us ing a M&C Products PMA 100-L O 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent)

and the CO 2 

## content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments

(CAI0 600 Series CO 2 

## gas analyzer (or equivalent). An in tegrated sample of the gas stream was

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe w ith an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizi ng an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A sc hematic drawing of the emission

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2.

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated usin g Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers ) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger).

3.2 PM and PM 2.5 

## Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM/PM 2.5 

## concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM 2.5 

## , and CPM concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic st ack sampling system. This

system will consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM 10 

## particle sizer cyclone followed by a

PM 2.5 

## particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a

glass recirculating ice water cond enser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of

sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of

HPLC water, the first and f ourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccan t. A schematic drawing of the PM 2.5 

## /CPM sample

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM fraction was collected on the front half of

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP.

3.3 

## Total Selected Metals Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emissi on rates were measured us ing the procedures of

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected meta ls concentrations and emission rates were

measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic st ack sampling system. This

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or qu artz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a

heated quartz fiber filter assemb ly, (4) a set of six GS impingers , (5) a length of sample line,

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 4 

## and (6) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice.

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid

(HNO 3 

## )/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the thir d impinger was empty, and the fourth

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desi ccant. A schematic drawing of the metals

sampling train is provided as Figure 4.

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60,

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1 ) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a le ngth of sample line, and (6) a Nutech ® control case

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrate d orifice. The first impinger was left empty

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impi ngers contained approximately 300 g of silica

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5.

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentr ations and Emission Rates

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech ® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heat ed steel probe with a

glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a recirc ulating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length

of sample line, and (7) a Nutech ® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was fill ed with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desi ccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061

sampling train is provided as Figure 6.

3.6 HF and HCl Concentratio ns and Emission Rates

Measurement of hydrogen halide co ncentrations and emission rates were conducted using the

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appe ndix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or qu artz probe liner; (2) a heated bor osilicate or quartz glass filter

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter

support; (3) a set of three Gr eensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H 2 

## SO 4 

## ), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Fi gure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A

sample train.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 5 

## 4.0 Test Results

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2 below.

Table2

41 Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission

Rate

(lbs/hr) Emission Rate

(lbs/ton glass) Emission

Rate

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM 2.5 

## 0.13 0.071 4.7

Organic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 0.0071 0.0038 0.25

Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 

## 0.071 0.038 2.6 September 28 & 29,

2010

Total PM 2.5 

## 0.21 0.11 7.5

Filterable Particulate 1.19 0.64 44.5

Antimony < 1.3E-5 < 7.0E-6 < 4.9E-4

Arsenic 4.6E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3

Beryllium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4

Cadmium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4

Chromium 4.5E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3

Cobalt 1.1E-5 5.6E-6 4.0E-4

Lead 3.4E-5 1.8E-5 1.3E-3

Manganese 1.2E-4 6.2E-5 4.3E-3

Nickel < 1.6E-5 < 8.7E-6 < 6.1E-4 September 29 & 30,

2010

Selenium < 3.3E-5 < 1.7E-5 < 1.2E-3

September 28, 2010 Mercury 2.9E-6 1.6E-6 9.9E-2

September 29 & 30,

2010 Hexavalent Chromium < 2.1E-6 < 1.1E-6 < 7.7E-5

Hydrogen Chloride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1 September 28 & 29,

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O 2 

## because exhaust from the

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O 2 

## ).

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the an alytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the

sample fractions.



## Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Appendix A. Process data

associated with the emissions test program is provided in Appendix B. Field and computergenerated data sheets are incl uded in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents

and Appendix E includes laborat ory analytical reports.

## Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 6 

## Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or

Owens Corning Insulating, LLC. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without

NAIMA’s consent except as required by law or cour t order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the

competent performance of its duties in execu ting the assignment and preparing reports in

accordance with the normal standards of the pr ofession, but disclaims any responsibility for

consequential damages.

This report was prepared by:

Brandon V. Chase

Staff Environmental Engineer

This report was reviewed by:

Randal J. Tysar

Senior Environmental Engineer

# Figures

### diameter = 36"

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.4

10 4.2

9 6.4

8 9.0

7 12.8

6 23.2

5 27.0

4 29.6

3 31.8

2 33.6

1 35.2



## Figure 1

Site: Sampling Date:

Owens Corning September 28-30, 2010

Mount Vernon, Ohio

#1 Melter BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan N ot to Scale 144"

120"

### Bags Samples

to analyzers



## Figure 2

Site: Sampling Date:

USEPA Method 3 A September 28-30, 2010

Owens Corning

Mount Vernon, Ohio

#1 Melter BT Environmental Consulting,

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan Data Acquisition System



### Calibration Gases

(Fed to Probe Tip) Environics Gas

Dilution System M&C Model 100-L

O 2 

### Analyzer CAI Series 600

CO 2 

### Analyzer pump tedlar

bagFigure 3Site: SamplingUSEPA OTM27/28 September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 MelterBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 Wolcott Ferndale,MichiganPumpSilica gelHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 545mm Filter HousingFilter Holder W/ Teflon FilterVerticle CondenserPot Belly Impinger100 mL DI H2OFigure 4Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 29 September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 MelterBT Environmental Consulting Inc.2615 Wolcott FerndaleMichigan 48220PumpSilica gel100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solutionHeated Filter BoxS-Type Pitot w/ ThermocoupleHeated Probe w/ Glass Liner & NozzleMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Figure 5Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 30B Sampling Train September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 MelterBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan 48220Knock outPumpTemperature sensorMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Sample LineDessicantMercuryTrapProbeFigure 6Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 0061 September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 MelterBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpMeter RigTemp.ProbeFilterOnOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5150 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptySilica GelPerastaltic pumpTeflon tee75 mL 0.1 N KOHEmptyFigure 7Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 26A Sampling TrainSeptember 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 MelterBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.2615 WolcottFerndale, MichiganPumpHeated Filter BoxS-type pitot w/ thermocoupleHeated probe with glass linerMeter RigTempProbeFilterOOff-+00:001 2 3 4 5Empty15 mL 0.1N H2SO4Silica Gel

# APPENDIX A

DETAILED TEST RUN RESULTS

### Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 9/29/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:33:00 12:05:00 7:56:00

Run Finish Time 11:39:00 16:25:00 12:06:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 232.83 245.94 241.9 240



### D N Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.225 0.250 0.250 0.242



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.58 29.88 29.68



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.46



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 90.640 93.725 90.375 91.580



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 86.08 87.79 78.81 84.23



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 87.005 89.683 88.807 88.498



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 50 51 39 46.7



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.35 2.40 1.84 2.20



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.4



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.974 0.974 0.980 0.976



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.6 20.5 20.6



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79 79 79 79.0



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.89 28.89 28.90 28.89



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.60 28.60 28.68 28.63



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.58 29.88 29.68



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 153 155 157 155



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.148 0.114 0.110 0.124



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 23.3 20.5 20.1 21.3



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 8,175 7,204 7,138 7,505



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 9,863 8,710 8,525 9,033



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 117.2 105.1 106.8 109.7



### W

p Production, tons glass per hour



### W Filterable PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 14.8 11.6 8.6 11.7



### C mg/dscm Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 6.0E+00 4.6E+00 3.4E+00 4.7E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-01 1.2E-01 9.1E-02 1.3E-01



### E lb/ton product Filterable PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.6



### C mg/dscm Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E-01 3.1E-01 2.0E-01 2.5E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.5E-03 8.5E-03 5.3E-03 7.1E-03



### E lb/ton product Organic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 4.8 6.7 7.8 6.4



### C mg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+00 2.6E+00 3.1E+00 2.6E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.0E-02 7.1E-02 8.3E-02 7.1E-02



### E lb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W Total PM 2.5 Catch Weight, mg 20.2 19.1 16.9 18.7



### C mg/dscm Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 8.2E+00 7.5E+00 6.7E+00 7.5E+00



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM 2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-01 2.0E-01 1.8E-01 2.1E-01



### E lb/ton product Total PM 2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

### 10-3990.12 Owens Corning

Mt Vernon 100 Blackjack Rd Address

Matthew Young PersonnelPlant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 2 Average

Date Test Date 9/29/2010 9/30/2010 9/30/2010

Start Run Start Time 13:04:00 7:02:00 10:50:00

Run Finish Time 16:28:00 10:25:00 12:18:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.370 0.370 0.370 0.370

C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81

Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 1.75 1.92 2.11 1.92

V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 143.985 149.900 158.640 150.842

t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 98.58 83.52 93.44 91.85

V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 136.914 146.060 151.879 144.951

V l c Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 57 80 81 72.7

V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.68 3.77 3.81 3.42

% H 2 O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.9 2.5 2.4 2.3

M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.981 0.975 0.976 0.977

%CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.5 1 0.9 0.8

%O 2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.7 20.2 20.5

% CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.9 78.3 78.9 78.7

M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.99 28.95 28.95

M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.69 28.71 28.68 28.70

P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03

P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81

t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 168 161 164 165

Δ P

av g Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.102 0.114 0.124 0.114

v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 19.5 20.6 21.6 20.6

A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 6,818 7,202 7,518 7,180

Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 8,283 8,732 9,158 8,724

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.2 100.1 99.7 99.6

W

p Production, tons of glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 218.0 142.0 185.1 181.7

C

m g /dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 56.2 34.3 43.0 44.5

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.44 0.93 1.21 1.19

E lb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

C

m g /dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.2E-04 4.8E-04 4.6E-04 4.9E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-05 1.3E-05 1.3E-05 1.3E-05

E lb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0

C

m g /dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-03 1.7E-03 1.6E-03 1.7E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.6E-05 4.6E-05 4.6E-05 4.6E-05

E lb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

C

m g /dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

E lb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

C

m g /dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

E lb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 8.1 6.3 6.4 6.9

C

m g /dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-03 1.5E-03 1.5E-03 1.7E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.3E-05 4.1E-05 4.2E-05 4.5E-05

E lb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 1.9 2.2 0.8 1.6

C

m g /dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 4.8E-04 5.2E-04 1.9E-04 4.0E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-05 1.4E-05 5.3E-06 1.1E-05

E lb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 5.7 8.6 1.5 5.3

C

m g /dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-03 2.1E-03 3.5E-04 1.3E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.8E-05 5.6E-05 9.8E-06 3.4E-05

E lb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 17.4 18.5 17.1 17.6

C

m g /dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 4.5E-03 4.5E-03 4.0E-03 4.3E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-04 1.2E-04 1.1E-04 1.2E-04

E lb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

C

m g /dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 6.4E-04 6.0E-04 5.8E-04 6.1E-04

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-05 1.6E-05 1.6E-05 1.6E-05

E lb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

C

m g /dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03

C

m g /dscm @ 7%O 2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A

E lb/h r Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 3.3E-05

E lb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 10-3990.12 Owens Corning

Mt Vernon Address

PM PersonnelM30B Mercury TestingCompany NamePlant Location CityPlant Location StateSource NameSource IDOwens Corning Mount Vernon Ohio 41 Furnace 41 FurnacePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"Measured Value(mg/dscm)CorrectedConcentration(mg/dscm at 7% O2)Basis (Wet or Dry)Test Method Used(EPA Method 30B)Data Flag (ADL,BDL, DDL)Test MethodCommentsCalculatedEmission Rate(lb/hr)ProcessProduction Rate(tons glass/hr)CalculatedEmission Rate(lb/ton)1 9/28/2010 7:35 9/28/2010 9:35 9.99E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 3.06E-062 9/28/2010 9:54 9/28/2010 11:54 1.00E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 3.07E-063 9/28/2010 12:12 9/28/2010 14:12 9.81E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 2.65E-06Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest End TimeRun Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DatePage 1 of 312/1/2010M30B Mercury TestingQA/QC DocumentationTrap IDSection 1Mass (ng)Section 2Mass (ng)TotalMass (ng)InitialSpike(ng)Total Non-Spike (ng)SampleVolume(dscm)VolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough(%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)2.6 0.4 20.5 9,863 8,175 153 R1, A 14.6 0.18 14.78 0 14.78 0.15 1% 10.1002.6 0.4 20.5 9,863 8,175 153 R2, A 15 0.07 15.07 0 15.07 0.15 9% 00.1002.6 0.4 20.5 8,710 7,204 155 R3, A 14.7 0.1 14.8 0 14.8 0.15 9% 10.098Trap #1≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass forHg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section1 for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscmFlue GasTemperature (F)Other Supporting InformationFlue GasMoisture(%)Flue GasO2(%)Flue GasCO2(%)Flue Gas FlowRate (dscfm)Flue GasFlow Rate(acfm)Page 2 of 312/1/2010M30B Mercury TestingTrap IDSection 1MassSection 2MassTotalMassInitialSpikeTotal Non-SpikeSampleVolumeVolumeDifference (%)Volume Diff.LimitBreaktrough (%)BreaktroughLimitConcentration(μg/dscm)Abs. diff. RD (%) LimitCrecR (%) by RunRavg(%)LimitR1, B 33.5 0.26 33.76 20 13.76 0.15 1% 10.0920.008 4 0.1249 94R2, B 25.0 0.33 25.33 10 15.33 0.16 9% 10.0930.007 4 0.0538 88R3, B 24.4 0.17 24.57 10 14.57 0.15 9% 10.0950.003 2 0.0617 95AverageRecovery,between 85 and115%Trap #2Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )≤20% of fieldrecovery test≤10% of Section1 Hg mass for Hgconc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% of Section 1for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm≥10 % RD massfor Hg conc. >1μg/dscm: or≤20% RD or≤0.2μg/dscm abs.diff.for Hg conc.≤1μg/dscm92Page 3 of 312/1/2010

## Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/29/2010 9/30/2010 9/30/2010

Start Run Start Time 13:04:00 7:02:00 10:50:00

Run Finish Time 16:27:00 10:25:00 14:10:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.374 0.374 0.374 0.374



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 2.24 1.91 2.12 2.09



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 164.155 150.550 158.310 157.672



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 104.51 90.09 95.66 96.75



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 156.182 146.385 152.465 151.677



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 156 107 219 160.7



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.34 5.04 10.31 7.56



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.5 3.3 6.3 4.7



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.955 0.967 0.937 0.953



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.5 20.6 20.5 20.5



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79 78.9 79 79.0



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.90 28.90 28.90



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.41 28.54 28.21 28.39



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H

2 O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 166 160 162 163



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.128 0.110 0.121 0.120



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 21.8 20.2 21.3 21.1



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 7,449 7,036 7,162 7,216



### Q

a w Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 9,267 8,582 9,049 8,966



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.3 100.4 102.9 101.5



### W

p Production, tons of glass per hour



### W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3



### C mg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 9.0E-05 7.2E-05 6.9E-05 7.7E-05



### C mg/dscm@7%O 2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/h r Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-06 1.9E-06 1.9E-06 2.1E-06



### E lb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.12 OC

Mt. Vernon Address

JP Personnel

## Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing

Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/28/2010 9/29/2010 9/29/2010

Start Run Start Time 16:07:00 7:17:00 8:26:00

Run Finish Time 17:10:00 8:20:00 10:36:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24



### Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60



### D N Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.370 0.370 0.370 0.370



### C

p Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84



### Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013



### P Br Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.88 29.88 29.78



### Δ H Average orifice meter Differential, inches H 2 O 2.12 1.83 1.89 1.95



### V

m Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 49.255 45.700 46.590 47.182



### t

m Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 85.96 82.94 88.02 85.64



### V mstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 47.958 45.163 45.622 46.248



### V lc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 27 25 24 25.3



### V wstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.27 1.18 1.13 1.19



### % H 2 

### O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5



### M fd Dry Mole Fraction 0.974 0.975 0.976 0.975



### %CO 2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.3



### %O 2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.5 20.9 20.7



### % CO+ N 2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.0 79.0 79.1 79.0



### M d Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.89 28.90 28.84 28.87



### M

s Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.61 28.62 28.57 28.60



### P

g Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H 2 O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03



### P

s Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.88 29.88 29.78



### t

s Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 157 152 153 154



### Δ P

avg Average Velocity Head, inches of H 2 O 0.128 0.110 0.113 0.117



### v s Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 21.7 20.1 20.3 20.7



### A

s Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1



### Q sd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 7,593 7,154 7,238 7,328



### Q

aw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 9,213 8,515 8,627 8,785



### %I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.7 99.7 99.5 99.6



### W

p Production, tons of glass per hour



### W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0



### C mg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.5E-01 1.5E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03



### E lb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product



### W HF Catch Weight, μg 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0



### C mg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.5E-01 1.5E-01



### C mg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O

2 N/A N/A N/A



### E lb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03



### E lb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product 

## 10-3990.12 OC

Mt. Vernon Address

JP Personnel

# APPENDIX B

PROCESS DATA

# APPENDIX C

FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA

SHEETSBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4 ft A Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 3 Method 26A Total Points24Location Mt. VernonRate (cfm)Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 2.5Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 2.5Operator JPBws (%)3.00 # of Ports 2 Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 18Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.58Barometric29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.58Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.37O2 (%)20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)0.4Md28.89Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.56Act. Flow (cfm)9,220Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 47.70Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,800Moisture % 2.60Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,566Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 2.5 16:07373.63 0.09 154 81 811.491.49 263 263 53 2.5112.5 5.0 16:09375.36 0.09 153 81 811.491.49 264 262 50 2.5105.0 7.5 16:12377.10 0.08 153 81 811.331.32 262 263 47 2.597.5 10.0 16:14378.73 0.08 153 82 811.331.32 264 262 46 2.5810.0 12.5 16:17380.34 0.09 153 83 811.491.49 261 263 46 2.5712.5 15.0 16:19382.08 0.08 153 84 821.331.33 264 262 45 2.5615.0 17.5 16:22383.73 0.12 154 85 821.991.99 261 263 45 3517.5 20.0 16:24385.74 0.13 154 87 822.192.19 262 262 45 3420.0 22.5 16:27387.84 0.15 155 88 822.492.49 262 263 45 3.5322.5 25.0 16:29390.09 0.17 157 89 822.822.82 262 263 44 4225.0 27.5 16:32392.46 0.18 160 90 832.992.99 261 263 44 4127.5 30.0 16:37394.91 0.18 160 91 832.992.99 262 262 45 41230.0 32.5 16:40397.38 0.17 157 86 842.822.82 263 262 45 41132.5 35.0 16:42399.75 0.18 159 90 842.992.99 261 262 45 41035.0 37.5 16:45402.21 0.17 159 91 842.822.82 266 264 46 4937.5 40.0 16:47404.58 0.17 159 92 842.822.82 263 264 46 4840.0 42.5 16:50406.97 0.16 160 93 852.662.66 262 263 46 4742.5 45.0 16:52409.28 0.14 160 93 852.322.32 265 263 46 3.5645.0 47.5 16:55411.45 0.12 161 93 851.991.99 261 263 46 3547.5 50.0 16:57413.46 0.10 160 93 851.661.66 264 264 46 3450.0 52.5 17:00415.31 0.11 161 93 861.831.83 262 263 47 3352.5 55.0 17:02417.25 0.11 159 93 861.831.83 266 263 47 3255.0 57.5 17:05419.19 0.10 157 93 861.661.66 262 264 47 3157.5 60.0 17:07421.03 0.10 156 93 861.661.66 263 263 48 360.0 17:10422.88Average:49.26 0.13 157.0 88.5 83.42.132.12 263 263 46.25 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4 ft A Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 3 Method 26A Total Points24Location Mt. VernonRate (cfm)Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 2.5Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 2.5Operator JPBws (%)3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 14Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.88Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.37O2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)0.5Md28.90Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.57Act. Flow (cfm)8,522Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 44.96Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,346Moisture % 2.55Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,126Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 2.5 7:17423.15 0.12 151 77 772.001.98 263 263 58 4112.5 5.0 7:19425.12 0.12 150 77 772.001.98 260 263 56 4105.0 7.5 7:22427.10 0.13 151 78 782.172.15 261 263 54 497.5 10.0 7:24429.16 0.12 151 79 782.001.98 265 264 53 4810.0 12.5 7:27431.14 0.12 151 81 782.001.98 260 263 52 4712.5 15.0 7:29433.13 0.11 152 82 781.831.82 266 264 52 3.5615.0 17.5 7:32435.03 0.10 152 84 791.671.66 261 263 50 3.5517.5 20.0 7:34436.84 0.10 152 85 791.671.66 265 263 49 3.5420.0 22.5 7:37438.66 0.10 152 86 791.671.66 262 264 49 3.5322.5 25.0 7:39440.49 0.10 152 86 791.671.66 264 263 48 3.5225.0 27.5 7:42442.30 0.10 152 87 801.671.66 266 263 48 3.5127.5 30.0 7:47444.12 0.10 151 87 801.671.66 261 263 48 3.51230.0 32.5 7:50445.95 0.09 149 83 811.501.49 266 262 48 3.51132.5 35.0 7:52447.68 0.09 151 86 811.501.50 260 263 48 3.51035.0 37.5 7:55449.42 0.09 152 87 811.501.50 267 263 47 3.5937.5 40.0 7:57451.16 0.08 152 88 811.331.33 262 264 47 3840.0 42.5 8:00452.81 0.08 152 89 821.331.33 261 263 46 3742.5 45.0 8:02454.44 0.07 152 89 821.171.16 266 263 46 3645.0 47.5 8:05455.96 0.11 152 89 821.831.83 261 263 46 4547.5 50.0 8:07457.87 0.13 152 90 822.172.16 266 263 46 4450.0 52.5 8:10459.94 0.14 153 91 822.332.33 260 263 46 4.5352.5 55.0 8:12462.11 0.15 153 91 832.502.50 264 262 47 5255.0 57.5 8:15464.35 0.15 152 92 832.502.50 264 264 47 5157.5 60.0 8:17466.60 0.15 152 92 832.502.50 261 263 47 560.0 8:20468.85Average:45.70 0.11 151.6 85.7 80.21.841.83 263.0 263.1 49.1 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4 ft A Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 3 Method 26A Total Points24Location MT.VernonRate (cfm)Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 2.5Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 2.5Operator JPBws (%)3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run60.0Filter Number Condensate Volume 15Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.88Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.37O2 (%)20.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)0.0Md28.84Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.51Act. Flow (cfm)8,637Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 45.41Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,426Moisture % 2.43Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,203Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 2.5 8:26469.03 0.09 150 85 841.511.51 262 263 58 3112.5 5.0 8:28470.78 0.09 152 88 841.511.51 266 264 58 3105.0 7.5 8:31472.53 0.08 152 88 841.341.34 261 262 54 397.5 10.0 8:33474.16 0.08 152 89 841.341.34 266 263 53 3810.0 12.5 8:36475.79 0.08 152 89 841.341.34 262 264 53 3712.5 15.0 8:38477.43 0.08 152 89 841.341.34 266 262 51 3615.0 17.5 8:41479.06 0.12 153 90 842.012.01 264 263 50 3.5517.5 20.0 8:43481.06 0.14 153 91 842.352.35 266 263 48 4420.0 22.5 8:46483.22 0.14 154 92 842.352.35 262 263 48 4322.5 25.0 8:48485.40 0.15 153 93 842.522.51 262 263 47 4225.0 27.5 8:51487.65 0.15 154 93 852.522.51 265 263 47 4127.5 30.0 8:56489.90 0.15 153 94 852.522.52 261 263 47 41230.0 32.5 10:06492.16 0.12 151 85 852.012.01 263 263 55 3.51132.5 35.0 10:08494.18 0.12 153 86 862.012.01 264 261 48 3.51035.0 37.5 10:11496.19 0.14 154 88 852.352.35 260 263 47 4937.5 40.0 10:13498.36 0.13 154 90 862.182.18 264 262 47 3.5840.0 42.5 10:16500.44 0.12 154 93 862.012.01 261 264 47 3.5742.5 45.0 10:18502.46 0.12 154 93 862.012.01 266 263 47 3.5645.0 47.5 10:21504.46 0.11 154 94 861.851.84 266 264 46 3547.5 50.0 10:23506.40 0.10 155 94 861.681.68 262 265 46 3450.0 52.5 10:26508.25 0.10 155 95 861.681.68 266 263 46 3352.5 55.0 10:28510.07 0.10 155 94 861.681.68 261 263 46 3255.0 57.5 10:31511.92 0.10 155 95 871.681.68 265 263 46 3157.5 60.0 10:33513.78 0.10 154 95 871.681.68 263 262 46 360.0 10:36515.62Average:46.59 0.11 153.3 91.0 85.11.891.89 263.5 263.0 49.2083333 3.4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 5ft E Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Owens Corning DGM # MB 3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points24Location Mt VernonRate (cfm)Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 9.7Source Furnace 41 Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 9.7Operator Matthew YoungBws (%)2.63 # of Ports 2 Total Run232.8Filter Number Condensate Volume 32Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.58Barometric29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.58Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.225O2 (%)20.60 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00028CO2 (%)0.4Md28.89Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.60Act. Flow (cfm)9,863Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 86.90Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)8,396Moisture % 2.64Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)8,175Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 11.7 7:33776.52 0.21 160 79 790.500.46 251 251 67 31111.7 23.7 7:44781.10 0.22 161 81 800.520.46 248 249 62 31023.7 35.6 7:55785.83 0.22 161 83 810.520.46 248 251 55 3935.6 47.0 8:06790.52 0.20 161 85 820.470.46 253 250 53 3847.0 58.2 8:17795.03 0.19 159 86 830.450.461 252 250 54 3758.2 68.7 8:28799.39 0.17 160 87 830.400.465 249 250 54 3668.7 76.8 8:38803.53 0.10 153 87 840.240.464 255 253 55 3576.8 84.8 8:46806.71 0.10 152 88 850.240.475 250 253 55 4484.8 92.9 8:54809.88 0.10 152 88 850.240.478 256 254 56 4392.9 101.4 9:02813.03 0.11 151 88 850.260.478 250 253 56 42101.4 109.8 9:10816.32 0.11 149 88 850.260.479 250 250 57 41109.8 118.3 9:18819.61 0.11 149 88 860.260.482 258 254 57 412118.3 126.3 9:45822.91 0.10 148 86 860.240.48 249 253 64 411126.3 134.4 9:53826.14 0.10 149 87 860.240.485 251 255 56 410134.4 142.5 10:01829.31 0.10 150 88 860.240.483 252 249 56 49142.5 150.6 10:09832.47 0.10 150 89 860.240.482 251 253 56 48150.6 158.6 10:17835.63 0.10 150 89 860.240.482 249 253 55 47158.6 167.1 10:25838.78 0.11 151 89 870.260.482 253 251 56 46167.1 177.0 10:33842.06 0.15 152 89 870.360.481 251 249 56 45177.0 187.5 10:42845.88 0.17 152 90 870.400.479 248 250 57 44187.5 198.6 10:52849.94 0.19 151 90 870.450.479 252 253 57 43198.6 210.0 11:03854.19 0.20 152 90 870.470.481 253 253 57 42210.0 221.4 11:14858.53 0.20 152 90 870.470.479 251 254 57 41221.4 232.8 11:25862.82 0.20 151 90 870.480.479 250 252 58 4232.8 11:39867.16Average:90.64 0.15 153.2 87.3 84.90.350.47 251 252 56.9166667 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 5ft E Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Owens Corning DGM # MB 3 Method OTM27-28 Total Points24Location Mt VernonRate (cfm)Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 10.2Source Furnace 41 Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 10.2Operator Matthew YoungBws (%)2.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run245.9Filter Number Condensate Volume 34Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.58Barometric29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain 17DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.58Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.25O2 (%)20.60 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00034CO2 (%)0.4Md28.89Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.60Act. Flow (cfm)8,710Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 89.57Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,396Moisture % 2.61Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,204Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 9.2 12:05867.69 0.09 149 86 860.330.468 250 250 65 4119.2 18.3 12:14871.41 0.09 151 87 860.330.468 251 245 56 41018.3 27.0 12:23875.06 0.08 151 88 860.290.465 250 252 54 4927.0 35.6 12:31878.40 0.08 152 88 860.290.465 249 250 52 4835.6 44.8 12:39881.72 0.09 152 89 860.330.463 251 250 52 4744.8 54.4 12:48885.22 0.10 152 89 860.360.463 253 253 52 4654.4 64.6 12:57888.91 0.11 153 89 870.400.463 251 250 51 4564.6 76.0 13:07892.74 0.14 153 89 870.510.462 252 253 51 4476.0 87.4 13:18897.05 0.14 153 89 870.510.462 256 253 51 4387.4 99.2 13:29901.32 0.15 153 89 870.540.462 254 253 50 4299.2 111.1 13:40905.74 0.15 152 89 870.540.462 252 253 51 41111.1 122.1 13:51910.19 0.13 152 89 870.470.464 252 253 51 412122.1 134.3 14:22914.31 0.16 153 87 870.580.464 250 254 66 411134.3 146.1 14:34918.99 0.15 154 87 860.540.462 250 250 59 410146.1 158.0 14:45923.55 0.15 154 88 860.540.46 257 254 56 49158.0 169.0 14:56928.10 0.13 159 89 860.470.46 257 253 55 48169.0 180.0 15:07932.32 0.13 161 89 870.470.453 251 253 55 47180.0 190.6 15:18936.53 0.12 163 90 870.430.451 254 253 55 46190.6 200.2 15:28940.59 0.10 163 90 870.360.448 256 253 56 45200.2 209.4 15:37944.19 0.09 163 90 870.330.448 256 253 56 44209.4 218.5 15:46947.66 0.09 157 90 880.330.448 253 253 56 43218.5 228.2 15:55951.11 0.10 155 90 880.360.457 252 253 56 42228.2 237.9 16:04954.75 0.10 154 90 880.360.46 256 254 57 41237.9 245.9 16:13958.39 0.07 153 90 880.250.462 253 253 57 4245.9 16:25961.42Average:93.72 0.11 154.7 88.8 86.80.410.46 252.8 252.1 55.0 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 5ft E Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Owens Corning DGM # 3 Method OTM27-28 Total Points24Location Mt VernonRate (cfm)Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 10.1Source Furnace 41 Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 10.1Operator Matthew YoungBws (%)2.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run241.9Filter Number Condensate Volume 21Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.88Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.25O2 (%)20.50 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00034CO2 (%)0.5Md28.90Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.68Act. Flow (cfm)8,525Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 88.70Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,286Moisture % 2.03Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,138Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 10.1 7:56961.61 0.11 152 71 700.390.454 252 253 67 31110.1 20.7 8:06965.40 0.12 151 71 710.430.454 251 253 58 31020.7 30.8 8:16969.44 0.11 151 73 710.390.456 253 254 53 3930.8 40.5 8:26973.24 0.10 152 74 720.360.456 250 253 52 3840.5 50.2 8:35976.73 0.10 154 75 720.360.456 250 252 51 3750.2 59.8 8:44980.33 0.10 154 76 730.360.453 259 254 50 3659.8 70.8 8:53983.94 0.13 154 77 740.470.454 255 253 50 3570.8 81.8 9:04987.99 0.13 155 78 750.470.455 254 253 50 3481.8 93.3 9:15992.05 0.14 155 79 760.500.454 254 254 50 3393.3 104.3 9:26996.25 0.13 154 79 760.470.455 250 253 50 32104.3 114.4 9:371000.38 0.11 154 80 770.390.456 249 252 50 31114.4 123.6 9:471004.21 0.09 154 81 780.320.457 251 253 50 312123.6 135.0 10:081007.61 0.14 153 79 780.500.458 251 253 58 311135.0 146.4 10:191011.92 0.14 154 81 790.500.459 258 253 50 310146.4 158.3 10:301016.19 0.15 155 82 790.540.459 255 253 49 39158.3 170.1 10:411020.56 0.15 156 83 800.540.457 253 254 50 38170.1 181.5 10:521024.92 0.14 159 83 800.500.457 258 254 50 37181.5 191.2 11:031029.19 0.10 164 84 810.360.452 252 253 51 36191.2 199.8 11:121032.75 0.08 164 84 810.290.446 254 253 52 35199.8 208.5 11:201036.04 0.08 164 85 820.290.446 257 253 53 34208.5 216.5 11:281039.37 0.07 164 86 830.250.447 259 254 55 33216.5 224.6 11:361042.39 0.07 164 87 830.250.447 256 253 56 32224.6 233.3 11:441045.43 0.08 165 87 840.290.447 253 254 58 31233.3 241.9 11:521048.70 0.08 165 88 850.290.447 248 250 59 3241.9 12:061051.98Average:90.38 0.11 157.0 80.1 77.50.400.45 253.4 253.1 53 3.0Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4ft A Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany Owens Corning DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points240.001@15" 0.001@8"Location Mt VernonRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PMBws (%)3.00 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number10072343Condensate Volume29Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 28DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.88Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.37O2 (%)20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)0.5Md28.90Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.58Act. Flow (cfm)8,300Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 136.32Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)6,966Moisture % 1.93Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)6,757Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 13:0452.44 0.13 167 90 892.232.21 251 255 67 4.5124.0 8.0 13:0855.75 0.15 167 94 902.582.55 253 253 67 5118.0 12.0 13:1259.31 0.15 168 96 902.582.55 254 254 64 51112.0 16.0 13:1662.93 0.15 168 98 912.582.55 254 252 60 51016.0 20.0 13:2066.55 0.14 168 99 912.402.38 254 254 58 51020.0 24.0 13:2470.09 0.11 168 99 911.891.87 255 255 57 5924.0 28.0 13:2873.15 0.08 168 99 921.371.36 253 252 57 4.5928.0 32.0 13:3275.83 0.07 168 99 921.201.19 255 254 56 3.5832.0 36.0 13:3678.34 0.07 168 99 931.201.19 253 254 56 3.5836.0 40.0 13:4080.84 0.07 168 99 931.201.19 254 254 57 3.5740.0 44.0 13:4483.55 0.11 168 99 931.891.87 254 254 57 4744.0 48.0 13:4886.51 0.11 169 100 941.891.87 253 253 56 4648.0 52.0 13:5289.61 0.08 168 100 941.371.36 254 254 56 3.5652.0 56.0 13:5692.33 0.08 167 100 941.371.37 252 254 57 3.5556.0 60.0 14:0094.98 0.07 167 100 941.201.2 253 254 57 3.5560.0 64.0 14:0497.52 0.07 167 100 941.201.2 255 253 57 3.5464.0 68.0 14:08100.02 0.07 167 100 941.201.2 252 254 58 3.5468.0 72.0 14:12102.50 0.07 168 100 951.201.2 254 253 59 3.5372.0 76.0 14:16104.97 0.08 168 100 951.371.37 253 253 59 3.5376.0 80.0 14:20107.68 0.08 167 100 951.371.37 253 253 60 3.5280.0 84.0 14:24110.36 0.09 167 101 951.551.54 254 253 61 4284.0 88.0 14:28113.2 0.09 167 101 951.551.54 254 254 61 4188.0 92.0 14:32116.06 0.08 168 101 961.371.37 254 253 63 3.5192.0 96.0 14:41118.66 0.08 167 102 961.381.37 254 253 65 3.51296.0 100.0 14:52121.44 0.08 167 102 961.371.37 254 254 65 3.512100.0 104.0 14:56124.30 0.09 167 100 961.551.54 253 254 66 411104.0 108.0 15:00127.06 0.09 167 100 961.551.54 253 255 62 411108.0 112.0 15:04129.93 0.10 168 102 961.721.71 253 253 56 410112.0 116.0 15:08132.91 0.10 168 103 971.721.71 253 253 56 410116.0 120.0 15:12135.89 0.10 168 103 971.721.71 255 254 55 49120.0 124.0 15:16138.85 0.10 168 103 971.721.71 253 253 55 49124.0 128.0 15:20141.82 0.10 169 104 971.721.71 252 253 55 48128.0 132.0 15:24144.78 0.10 169 104 981.721.71 253 253 56 48132.0 136.0 15:28147.74 0.10 169 104 981.721.71 253 254 55 47136.0 140.0 15:32150.76 0.10 169 104 981.721.71 253 253 55 47140.0 144.0 15:36153.76 0.10 169 104 981.721.71 254 254 56 46144.0 148.0 15:40156.77 0.10 170 104 981.721.71 255 254 57 46148.0 152.0 15:44159.78 0.12 169 105 992.062.06 252 252 57 4.55152.0 156.0 15:48162.88 0.12 169 105 992.062.06 253 254 57 4.55156.0 160.0 15:52166.25 0.13 169 105 992.232.23 253 253 57 4.54160.0 164.0 15:56169.68 0.13 169 105 992.232.23 253 254 57 54164.0 168.0 16:00173.12 0.13 170 105 992.232.23 255 254 58 53168.0 172.0 16:04176.51 0.13 169 106 992.232.23 253 254 60 53172.0 176.0 16:08179.97 0.13 170 106 992.232.23 255 254 61 52176.0 180.0 16:12183.38 0.13 170 106 992.232.23 252 254 62 52180.0 184.0 16:16186.80 0.12 169 106 1002.062.06 254 253 63 4.51184.0 188.0 16:20190.02 0.12 170 106 1002.062.06 254 253 64 4.51188.0 192.0 16:24193.27 0.11 169 106 1001.891.89 253 252 65 4.5192.0 16:28196.42Average:143.99 0.10 168.2 101.5 95.61.761.75 253 254 59.0625 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4FTA Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points240.0001@15" 0.00@7"Location Mt VernonRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JBBws (%)3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter NumberCondensate Volume46Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 34DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.78Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.37O2 (%)20.7 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)1.0Md28.99Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.66Act. Flow (cfm)8,741Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 145.36Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,395Moisture % 2.53Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,173Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 7:02197.05 0.10 162 72 721.691.65 252 250 67 2124.0 8.0 7:06199.93 0.10 162 73 721.691.65 255 254 67 2118.0 12.0 7:10202.77 0.12 163 75 732.031.98 253 255 65 21112.0 16.0 7:14205.87 0.12 163 77 732.031.98 254 256 54 21016.0 20.0 7:18209.02 0.12 163 78 732.031.99 254 253 52 21020.0 24.0 7:22212.16 0.12 163 79 742.031.99 254 252 50 2924.0 28.0 7:26215.3 0.11 163 80 741.861.82 254 252 49 2928.0 32.0 7:30218.3 0.11 164 81 751.861.82 253 255 48 2832.0 36.0 7:34221.39 0.10 164 82 761.691.66 252 255 47 2836.0 40.0 7:38224.31 0.10 164 83 781.691.66 253 254 47 2740.0 44.0 7:42227.22 0.09 159 83 771.521.5 255 253 47 2744.0 48.0 7:46229.98 0.09 157 84 771.521.5 254 256 47 2648.0 52.0 7:50232.78 0.10 157 84 771.691.67 254 254 47 2652.0 56.0 7:54235.79 0.10 156 85 771.691.67 254 255 47 2556.0 60.0 7:58238.74 0.11 155 85 781.861.84 253 254 47 2560.0 64.0 8:02241.79 0.11 156 86 791.861.84 255 255 47 2464.0 68.0 8:06244.88 0.12 155 86 792.032.01 253 252 47 2468.0 72.0 8:10248.16 0.13 155 87 802.202.18 254 254 47 2372.0 76.0 8:14251.41 0.13 155 87 802.202.18 254 254 47 2376.0 80.0 8:18254.81 0.12 155 88 802.032.02 254 255 47 2.5280.0 84.0 8:22258.06 0.12 155 88 812.032.02 255 256 47 2284.0 88.0 8:26261.31 0.12 155 88 812.032.02 253 256 48 2188.0 92.0 8:30264.56 0.11 154 88 811.861.85 254 254 48 2192.0 96.0 8:39267.67 0.12 154 88 812.032.02 254 254 49 21296.0 100.0 8:49270.92 0.13 162 82 822.202.19 254 254 57 212100.0 104.0 8:53274.26 0.13 163 86 822.202.19 252 253 49 211104.0 108.0 8:57277.62 0.15 163 88 822.532.53 254 255 48 2.511108.0 112.0 9:01281.20 0.15 164 89 822.532.53 254 256 48 2.510112.0 116.0 9:05284.81 0.15 163 90 832.532.53 254 255 50 2.510116.0 120.0 9:09288.41 0.15 164 90 832.532.53 254 256 51 2.59120.0 124.0 9:13292 0.15 164 91 832.532.53 254 254 52 2.59124.0 128.0 9:17295.58 0.15 165 91 842.532.53 254 254 52 2.58128.0 132.0 9:21299.18 0.14 165 91 842.362.36 254 254 53 2.58132.0 136.0 9:25302.69 0.14 164 91 842.362.36 255 254 54 2.57136.0 140.0 9:29306.19 0.14 164 92 842.362.36 253 252 54 2.57140.0 144.0 9:33309.7 0.14 164 92 852.362.36 254 254 55 2.56144.0 148.0 9:37313.19 0.11 164 92 851.861.86 255 254 56 2.56148.0 152.0 9:41316.31 0.11 163 91 851.861.86 254 254 57 25152.0 156.0 9:45319.41 0.10 163 91 851.691.69 255 254 58 25156.0 160.0 9:49322.4 0.09 163 91 851.521.52 254 256 59 24160.0 164.0 9:53325.25 0.08 163 91 851.351.35 254 256 60 24164.0 168.0 9:57327.91 0.08 163 91 851.351.35 255 255 60 23168.0 172.0 10:01330.54 0.08 164 90 851.351.35 253 254 61 23172.0 176.0 10:05333.16 0.08 164 90 851.351.35 254 254 61 22176.0 180.0 10:09335.77 0.09 163 90 851.521.52 253 252 62 22180.0 184.0 10:13338.53 0.09 163 91 851.521.52 254 256 62 21184.0 188.0 10:17341.35 0.09 163 91 861.521.52 254 255 63 21188.0 192.0 10:21344.18 0.09 163 91 861.521.52 253 253 64 2192.0 10:25346.95Average:149.90 0.11 161.1 86.5 80.61.931.92 253.8 254.2 53.2 2Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4FTA Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points24Location Mt VernonRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.82 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JBBws (%)3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number10081633Condensate Volume51Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 30DGM Y1.003Pm (in Hg)29.78Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.37O2 (%)20.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00075CO2 (%)0.9Md28.95Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.62Act. Flow (cfm)9,167Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 151.08Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,715Moisture % 2.46Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,484Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 10:50347.20 0.13 162 85 852.222.2 252 246 67 4124.0 8.0 10:54350.56 0.13 165 85 842.222.19 252 253 57 4118.0 12.0 10:58353.93 0.14 165 86 842.392.36 253 254 53 4.51112.0 16.0 11:02357.42 0.14 165 88 842.392.36 253 254 51 51016.0 20.0 11:06360.91 0.15 164 90 852.572.53 254 253 51 51020.0 24.0 11:10364.48 0.15 165 90 852.572.53 253 254 51 5924.0 28.0 11:14368.06 0.15 165 91 852.572.53 255 255 51 5928.0 32.0 11:18371.6 0.15 165 92 852.572.53 253 251 51 5832.0 36.0 11:22375.18 0.15 165 93 862.572.54 255 254 52 5836.0 40.0 11:26378.74 0.15 165 94 862.572.53 253 253 52 5740.0 44.0 11:30382.31 0.13 165 94 872.222.2 254 254 53 5744.0 48.0 11:34385.72 0.13 165 95 872.222.2 255 253 53 5648.0 52.0 11:38389.14 0.10 165 95 881.711.69 253 254 54 5652.0 56.0 11:42392.12 0.10 164 95 881.711.69 255 254 55 5556.0 60.0 11:46395.07 0.12 164 95 882.052.03 253 252 55 5560.0 64.0 11:50398.32 0.12 164 95 892.052.03 253 254 55 5464.0 68.0 11:54401.57 0.12 165 96 892.052.03 254 253 55 5468.0 72.0 11:58404.82 0.12 165 96 892.052.03 253 253 56 5372.0 76.0 12:02408.07 0.12 165 96 902.052.04 255 253 57 5376.0 80.0 12:06411.32 0.12 164 97 902.052.04 253 254 58 5280.0 84.0 12:10414.57 0.12 165 97 902.052.04 254 254 59 5284.0 88.0 12:14417.82 0.12 165 97 902.052.04 254 252 59 5188.0 92.0 12:18421.06 0.12 165 98 912.052.04 252 252 60 5192.0 96.0424.31 0.12 164 98 912.052.04 254 253 60 51296.0 100.0427.56 0.12 161 93 922.052.04 254 251 67 512100.0 104.0 0:04430.83 0.12 161 96 922.052.04 252 253 63 511104.0 108.0 0:08434.07 0.11 162 97 921.881.87 254 252 63 511108.0 112.0 0:12437.18 0.11 163 97 921.881.87 253 253 64 510112.0 116.0 0:16440.28 0.11 164 98 921.881.87 254 255 65 510116.0 120.0 0:20443.38 0.11 164 98 921.881.87 253 252 66 59120.0 124.0 0:24446.55 0.10 164 98 931.711.7 254 253 58 59124.0 128.0 0:28449.48 0.10 164 98 931.711.7 255 253 56 58128.0 132.0 0:32452.47 0.09 165 99 931.541.53 253 255 56 58132.0 136.0 0:36455.34 0.09 165 99 931.541.53 254 253 56 57136.0 140.0 0:40458.23 0.12 165 99 932.052.05 252 253 56 57140.0 144.0 0:44461.48 0.12 164 99 942.052.05 255 253 56 56144.0 148.0 0:48464.68 0.14 165 99 942.392.39 254 254 59 5.56148.0 152.0 0:52468.27 0.14 165 100 942.392.39 253 253 60 5.55152.0 156.0 0:56471.71 0.14 165 100 942.392.39 254 255 62 5.55156.0 160.0 1:00475.21 0.14 165 101 942.392.39 253 253 64 5.54160.0 164.0 1:04478.79 0.13 165 101 952.222.22 254 254 65 5.54164.0 168.0 1:08482.24 0.13 165 101 952.222.22 254 253 66 5.53168.0 172.0 1:12485.69 0.13 165 102 952.222.22 253 253 62 5.53172.0 176.0 1:16489.14 0.13 165 102 952.222.22 255 252 62 5.52176.0 180.0 1:20492.57 0.12 164 102 962.052.05 251 253 59 52180.0 184.0 1:24495.89 0.12 164 102 962.052.05 256 354 57 51184.0 188.0 1:28499.19 0.12 164 102 962.052.05 251 253 57 51188.0 192.0 1:32502.5 0.12 165 102 962.052.05 254 254 56 5192.0505.84Average:158.64 0.12 164.4 96.3 90.62.122.11 253.5 255.2 57.9166667 5.0Leak CheckBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Owens Corning DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Mount Vernon, OH Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ N/A Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PM Bws (%) 1 # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number - Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)29.58Barometric29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y1Pm (in Hg)29.58Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) 0.4 Md28.88Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.78Act. Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B AB A B A B7:35:00 AM 0.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 5 6.40 6.26 86 86 3.0985 3.268 N/A5.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 86 86 N/A10.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 86 86 N/A15.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 5 86 86 N/A20.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 86 86 N/A25.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 N/A30.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 N/A35.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 N/A40.0 158.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 N/A45.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 N/A50.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 N/A55.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A60.0 153.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A65.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A70.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A75.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A80.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 89 N/A85.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A90.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A95.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A100.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A105.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 N/A110.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 89 N/A115.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 89 N/A9:35:00 AM 120.0 149.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 150.110 150.46 88 89 3.2536 3.4255 N/AAverage 120.0 154.8 255.0 255.087.36 87.52Volume143.710 144.200 0.1551 0.1575dscm0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15Trap/ Probe TempPost TestLeak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Owens Corning DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Mount Vernon, OH Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ N/A Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PM Bws (%) 2.6 # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number - Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)30.13Barometric30.13 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y1Pm (in Hg)30.13Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.05Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.46 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) 0.4 Md28.88Stack Area (sf)9.39Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.60Act. Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B AB A B A B9:54:00 AM 0.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 0.00 0 88 88 3.2538 3.42 N/A5.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 N/A10.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 N/A15.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 N/A20.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 N/A25.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 N/A30.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A35.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A40.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A45.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A50.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A55.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A60.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A65.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A70.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A75.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A80.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A85.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A90.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A95.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A100.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A105.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 N/A110.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A115.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A11:54:00 AM 120.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 150.400 150.2 87 88 3.4082 3.5892 N/AAverage 120.0 150.6 255.0 255.086.72 87.36Volume150.400 150.200 0.1544 0.1692dscm0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post TestTrap/ Probe TempBT Environmental Consulting30B Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Owens Corning DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points1Location Mount Vernon, OH Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ N/A Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 5.0Operator PM Bws (%) 2.3 # of Ports 1 Total Run120.0Filter Number - Condensate Volume N/ACpN/APs (in Hg)30.13Barometric30.13 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/ADGM Y1Pm (in Hg)30.13Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.05Actual Dn (in)N/AO2 (%)20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.46 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) 0.4 Md28.89Stack Area (sf)9.39Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.64Act. Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)150.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)#VALUE!Dry Ref Flow (cfm)#DIV/0!Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#VALUE!Clock Time Sample TimeStack TempCondenser FilterTemp (*F)A B A B A B AB A B A B12:12:00 PM 0.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 0.00 0.00 87 87 3.4086 3.5895 N/A5.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A10.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A15.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A20.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A25.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A30.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A35.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A40.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A45.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A50.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A55.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A60.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A65.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A70.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A75.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 N/A80.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A85.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A90.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A95.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A100.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A105.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A110.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A115.0 153.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 N/A2:12:00 PM 120.0 153.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 151.020 151.16 88 88 3.5636 3.7478 N/AAverage 120.0 151.5 255.0 255.086.44 87.36Volume151.020 151.160 0.155 0.1583dscm0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15Trap/ Probe TempPost Test.006 L @ 10" for 1 min. .009 L@10" for 1 min. .005 L @ 10" for 1 min. .007 L@10" for 1 min.Leak Check Train "A" UnspikedRotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)Leak Check Train "B" SpikedDGM Reading m3Pre Test Post Test Pre TestBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 7ft A Pollutant Hexchrome Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 6 Method OO61 Total Points24Location Mt. VernonRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JPBws (%)3.00 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number- Condensate Volume90Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.88Barometric29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 66DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.88Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.374O2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00076CO2 (%)0.5Md28.90Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.57Act. Flow (cfm)9,240Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 155.31Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,777Moisture % 4.51Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,544Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 13:04517.58 0.18 166 90 903.183.09 NA NA 65 4.5124.0 8.0 13:08521.55 0.18 166 94 903.183.1 NA NA 64 5118.0 12.0 13:12525.53 0.18 167 100 913.183.11 NA NA 58 51112.0 16.0 13:16529.54 0.18 166 101 913.183.11 NA NA 57 51016.0 20.0 13:20533.59 0.17 166 104 923.002.95 NA NA 55 51020.0 24.0 13:24537.54 0.17 166 106 943.002.95 NA NA 54 5924.0 28.0 13:28541.49 0.17 166 107 953.002.95 NA NA 54 5928.0 32.0 13:32545.42 0.17 166 107 953.002.95 NA NA 54 5832.0 36.0 13:36549.37 0.18 166 108 963.183.13 NA NA 53 5836.0 40.0 13:40553.45 0.18 166 109 963.183.13 NA NA 53 5740.0 44.0 13:44557.54 0.16 166 109 962.822.79 NA NA 52 5744.0 48.0 13:48561.4 0.16 166 109 982.822.79 NA NA 52 5648.0 52.0 13:52565.27 0.11 166 109 991.941.92 NA NA 52 3.5652.0 56.0 13:56568.49 0.11 166 109 991.941.92 NA NA 52 3.5556.0 60.0 14:00571.67 0.11 166 109 991.941.92 NA NA 52 3.5560.0 64.0 14:04574.86 0.11 166 109 1001.941.92 NA NA 52 3.5464.0 68.0 14:08578.05 0.10 166 109 1001.761.75 NA NA 52 3.5468.0 72.0 14:12581.11 0.10 166 109 1001.761.75 NA NA 52 3.5372.0 76.0 14:16584.17 0.10 167 109 1001.761.75 NA NA 51 3.5376.0 80.0 14:20587.24 0.10 166 109 1011.761.75 NA NA 51 3.5280.0 84.0 14:24590.31 0.10 166 109 1011.761.75 NA NA 51 3.5284.0 88.0 14:28593.4 0.10 165 110 1011.761.75 NA NA 51 3.5188.0 92.0 14:32596.47 0.10 165 110 1011.761.75 NA NA 51 3.5192.0 96.0 14:40599.53 0.10 165 110 1011.771.75 NA NA 51 3.51296.0 100.0 14:51602.60 0.09 164 102 1021.591.58 NA NA 53 312100.0 104.0 14:55605.50 0.09 165 106 1021.591.58 NA NA 51 311104.0 108.0 14:59608.4 0.09 165 107 1021.591.58 NA NA 50 311108.0 112.0 15:03611.29 0.09 165 109 1021.591.58 NA NA 50 310112.0 116.0 15:07614.20 0.08 166 109 1021.411.41 NA NA 49 310116.0 120.0 15:11616.96 0.08 166 109 1021.411.41 NA NA 49 39120.0 124.0 15:15619.71 0.08 166 110 1031.411.41 NA NA 49 39124.0 128.0 15:19622.44 0.08 167 110 1031.411.41 NA NA 49 38128.0 132.0 15:23625.20 0.09 167 110 1031.591.58 NA NA 49 38132.0 136.0 15:27628.10 0.09 167 110 1031.591.58 NA NA 50 37136.0 140.0 15:31630.99 0.09 167 111 1041.591.58 NA NA 50 37140.0 144.0 15:35633.9 0.09 167 111 1041.591.58 NA NA 50 36144.0 148.0 15:39636.83 0.12 168 111 1042.122.12 NA NA 50 3.56148.0 152.0 15:43640.17 0.12 167 112 1042.122.12 NA NA 50 3.55152.0 156.0 15:47643.55 0.15 167 112 1042.652.65 NA NA 50 45156.0 160.0 15:51647.3 0.15 167 112 1042.652.65 NA NA 50 44160.0 164.0 15:55651.08 0.15 168 113 1042.652.65 NA NA 51 44164.0 168.0 15:59654.83 0.15 169 114 1052.652.65 NA NA 51 43168.0 172.0 16:03658.62 0.16 168 114 1052.822.82 NA NA 53 4.53172.0 176.0 16:07662.51 0.16 168 114 1052.822.82 NA NA 53 4.52176.0 180.0 16:11666.4 0.16 169 114 1052.822.82 NA NA 53 4.52180.0 184.0 16:15670.27 0.16 168 115 1052.822.82 NA NA 53 4.51184.0 188.0 16:19674.17 0.15 168 115 1052.652.65 NA NA 54 41188.0 192.0 16:23677.95 0.15 168 115 1052.652.65 NA NA 54 4192.0 16:27681.73Average:164.16 0.1279 166.5 108.8 100.32.262.24 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 52.2916667 4Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.012 Probe # 7ft A Pollutant Hexchrome Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 6 Method OO61 Total Points24Location Mt. VernonRate (cfm)0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JPBws (%)3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number- Condensate Volume104Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 3DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.78Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.374O2 (%)20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00076CO2 (%)0.5Md28.90Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.58Act. Flow (cfm)8,577Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 145.69Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)144.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,274Moisture % 3.34Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,055Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 7:02682.64 0.09 161 79 791.571.57 NA NA 66 3124.0 8.0 7:06685.41 0.09 161 81 801.571.57 NA NA 66 3118.0 12.0 7:10688.24 0.09 161 83 801.571.57 NA NA 63 31112.0 16.0 7:14691.06 0.09 161 85 801.571.57 NA NA 59 31016.0 20.0 7:18693.88 0.09 161 87 811.571.57 NA NA 53 31020.0 24.0 7:22696.7 0.09 161 88 811.571.57 NA NA 49 3924.0 28.0 7:26699.51 0.08 161 89 821.391.39 NA NA 47 3928.0 32.0 7:30702.17 0.08 161 90 821.391.39 NA NA 46 3832.0 36.0 7:34704.85 0.08 161 91 831.391.39 NA NA 45 3836.0 40.0 7:38707.52 0.08 161 91 831.391.39 NA NA 45 3740.0 44.0 7:42710.19 0.08 161 92 841.391.39 NA NA 45 3744.0 48.0 7:46712.88 0.08 156 93 841.391.39 NA NA 45 3648.0 52.0 7:50715.54 0.11 155 92 851.911.91 NA NA 45 3652.0 56.0 7:54718.69 0.11 155 93 851.911.91 NA NA 45 3.5556.0 60.0 7:58721.85 0.14 155 94 852.442.44 NA NA 45 3.5560.0 64.0 8:02725.38 0.14 155 94 862.442.44 NA NA 43 4464.0 68.0 8:06728.92 0.15 154 95 862.612.61 NA NA 44 4468.0 72.0 8:10732.55 0.15 155 95 862.612.61 NA NA 44 4.5372.0 76.0 8:14736.24 0.15 155 96 872.612.61 NA NA 45 4.5376.0 80.0 8:18739.91 0.15 155 96 872.612.61 NA NA 44 4.5280.0 84.0 8:22743.6 0.15 155 96 872.612.61 NA NA 45 4.5284.0 88.0 8:26747.29 0.15 152 96 872.612.61 NA NA 45 4.5188.0 92.0 8:30751 0.15 152 96 882.612.61 NA NA 46 4.5192.0 96.0 8:39754.68 0.15 152 97 882.612.61 NA NA 45 4.51296.0 100.0 8:49758.37 0.11 156 88 881.911.91 NA NA 49 312100.0 104.0 8:53761.53 0.11 157 93 881.911.91 NA NA 48 311104.0 108.0 8:57764.7 0.11 157 93 881.911.91 NA NA 48 311108.0 112.0 9:01767.86 0.11 158 95 881.911.91 NA NA 47 310112.0 116.0 9:05771.02 0.11 158 96 881.911.91 NA NA 48 310116.0 120.0 9:09774.17 0.11 158 96 881.911.91 NA NA 48 39120.0 124.0 9:13777.3 0.10 158 96 891.741.74 NA NA 48 39124.0 128.0 9:17780.33 0.10 164 95 891.741.74 NA NA 49 38128.0 132.0 9:21783.36 0.10 164 96 891.741.74 NA NA 51 38132.0 136.0 9:25786.39 0.10 163 96 891.741.74 NA NA 50 37136.0 140.0 9:29789.4 0.10 163 96 891.741.74 NA NA 51 37140.0 144.0 9:33792.41 0.10 163 96 891.741.74 NA NA 51 36144.0 148.0 9:37795.43 0.10 163 96 901.741.74 NA NA 51 36148.0 152.0 9:41798.44 0.10 163 96 901.741.74 NA NA 51 35152.0 156.0 9:45801.46 0.11 164 96 901.911.91 NA NA 51 35156.0 160.0 9:49804.65 0.11 163 96 901.911.91 NA NA 52 3.54160.0 164.0 9:53807.8 0.11 164 97 901.911.91 NA NA 52 3.54164.0 168.0 9:57810.98 0.11 164 97 901.911.91 NA NA 53 3.53168.0 172.0 10:01814.14 0.11 164 97 901.911.91 NA NA 53 3.53172.0 176.0 10:05817.3 0.11 165 97 901.911.91 NA NA 53 3.52176.0 180.0 10:09820.48 0.11 164 98 911.911.91 NA NA 54 3.52180.0 184.0 10:13823.63 0.11 163 98 911.911.91 NA NA 54 3.51184.0 188.0 10:17826.83 0.11 165 97 901.911.91 NA NA 54 3.51188.0 192.0 10:21830.01 0.11 164 98 911.911.91 NA NA 55 3.5192.0 10:25833.19Average:150.55 0.11 159.6 93.5 86.71.911.91 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 49.7 3Leak CheckBT Environmental ConsultingIsokinetic Run SheetProject No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 7ft A Pollutant Hexchrome Points/Port 12Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 6 Method OO61 Total Points240@15" 0.005@6"Location Mt. VernonRate (cfm)Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0Source 41 Furnace Delta∆H@ 1.77 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JPBws (%)3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run192.0Filter Number- Condensate Volume150Cp0.840Ps (in Hg)29.78Barometric29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 69DGM Y1.013Pm (in Hg)29.78Ref Temp 68Static (in H2O)-0.03Actual Dn (in)0.374O2 (%)20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2)0.00076CO2 (%)0.5Md28.90Stack Area (sf)7.07Est.DH(in H2O) Ms28.57Act. Flow (cfm)8,991Must delete extra zeros in the Velocity columnVmnstd 151.66Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf)0.0Wet Ref Flow (cfm)7,598Moisture % 6.36Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s)0.0Dry Ref Flow (cfm)7,370Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in)#DIV/0! Comments:"Data Entry Cells""Calculated CellsDo Not Touch"PT # Start Time End TimeClock Time(24hr)DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter OutDesired DeltaHActualDelta HProbe Temp.(*F)Filter Temp(*F)Imp temp.(*F) Pump Vac.120.0 4.0 10:50833.32 0.12 161 90 902.102.09 NA NA 58 3.5124.0 8.0 10:54836.56 0.12 162 92 902.102.09 NA NA 50 3.5118.0 12.0 10:58839.75 0.12 161 92 902.102.09 NA NA 47 3.51112.0 16.0 11:02843 0.12 162 94 902.102.09 NA NA 46 3.51016.0 20.0 11:06846.32 0.12 162 94 902.102.09 NA NA 46 3.51020.0 24.0 11:10849.63 0.12 162 96 902.102.09 NA NA 47 3.5924.0 28.0 11:14852.95 0.11 161 97 901.931.92 NA NA 47 3.5928.0 32.0 11:18856.13 0.11 162 97 901.931.92 NA NA 48 3.5832.0 36.0 11:22859.29 0.11 161 98 911.931.92 NA NA 49 3.5836.0 40.0 11:26862.46 0.11 162 98 911.931.92 NA NA 49 3.5740.0 44.0 11:30865.63 0.11 161 99 911.931.92 NA NA 49 3.5744.0 48.0 11:34868.79 0.11 161 99 911.931.92 NA NA 49 3.5648.0 52.0 11:38871.97 0.11 161 100 921.931.92 NA NA 50 3.5652.0 56.0 11:42875.16 0.11 161 100 921.931.92 NA NA 50 3.5556.0 60.0 11:46878.37 0.10 161 100 921.751.75 NA NA 51 3.5560.0 64.0 11:50881.40 0.10 161 100 931.751.75 NA NA 51 3464.0 68.0 11:54884.45 0.10 161 100 931.751.75 NA NA 52 3468.0 72.0 11:58887.47 0.10 159 100 931.751.75 NA NA 52 3372.0 76.0 12:02890.54 0.10 160 101 941.751.75 NA NA 53 3376.0 80.0 12:06893.58 0.10 160 101 941.751.75 NA NA 53 3280.0 84.0 12:10896.62 0.10 159 101 941.751.75 NA NA 53 3284.0 88.0 12:14899.66 0.10 159 101 951.751.75 NA NA 54 3188.0 92.0 12:18902.67 0.10 159 101 951.751.75 NA NA 55 3192.0 96.0 12:26905.72 0.10 159 101 951.751.75 NA NA 54 31296.0 100.0 12:34908.78 0.12 159 96 952.102.1 NA NA 59 312100.0 104.0 12:38912.14 0.12 160 96 942.102.1 NA NA 53 3.511104.0 108.0 12:42915.35 0.10 160 97 941.751.75 NA NA 52 3.511108.0 112.0 12:46918.38 0.10 161 98 941.751.75 NA NA 54 310112.0 116.0 12:50921.42 0.10 162 98 931.751.75 NA NA 55 310116.0 120.0 12:54924.44 0.10 163 98 931.751.75 NA NA 58 39120.0 124.0 12:58927.46 0.10 162 98 931.751.75 NA NA 59 39124.0 128.0 13:02930.5 0.10 162 98 931.751.75 NA NA 60 38128.0 132.0 13:06933.52 0.09 163 98 931.581.57 NA NA 62 38132.0 136.0 13:10936.41 0.09 163 99 931.581.57 NA NA 63 37136.0 140.0 13:14939.3 0.09 161 99 931.581.58 NA NA 63 37140.0 144.0 13:18942.19 0.09 163 99 931.581.57 NA NA 62 36144.0 148.0 13:22945.06 0.09 164 98 931.581.57 NA NA 61 36148.0 152.0 13:26948.01 0.16 164 99 932.802.8 NA NA 59 35152.0 156.0 13:30951.7 0.16 165 99 932.802.8 NA NA 58 4.55156.0 160.0 13:34955.51 0.16 165 100 932.802.8 NA NA 58 4.54160.0 164.0 13:38959.34 0.16 165 101 932.802.8 NA NA 58 4.54164.0 168.0 13:42963.13 0.16 165 101 932.802.8 NA NA 59 4.53168.0 172.0 13:46966.95 0.16 165 101 912.802.8 NA NA 59 4.53172.0 176.0 13:50970.74 0.16 165 102 942.802.8 NA NA 60 4.52176.0 180.0 13:54974.57 0.20 164 102 943.503.5 NA NA 60 4.52180.0 184.0 13:58978.84 0.20 163 102 943.503.5 NA NA 59 61184.0 188.0 14:02983.1 0.20 164 102 953.503.5 NA NA 60 61188.0 192.0 14:06987.33 0.20 163 102 953.503.5 NA NA 60 6192.0 14:10991.63Average:158.31 0.121 161.9 98.6 92.72.122.12 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 54.6666667 3.6Leak Check

# APPENDIX D

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DOCUMENTS41 Furnace Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results SummaryOwens Corning - Mt. Vernon, Ohio PlantBTEC Project No. 10-3990.12Sampling Dates: September 28 - 30, 2010Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 AverageTest Run Date9/28/2010 9/28/2010 9/29/2010 9/29/2010 9/30/2010 9/30/2010Test Time12:10 16:34 15:31 15:54 13:09 13:11Oxygen concentration (%) 20.6 20.6 20.5 20.5 20.6 20.5 20.6Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 20.6 20.6 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.2 20.5Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.7Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.9 0.6CO2Correction1 2 3 4 56Co0.11 0.12 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.01Cma10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10Cm10.30 10.3 10.24 10.30 10.15 10.15O2Correction1 2 3 4 56Co-0.03 -0.04 0.01 0.02 -0.01 -0.01Cma9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97Cm10.0 10.0 9.97 9.96 9.94 10.15Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases

# APPENDIX E

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTSCorrected Corrected CorrectedVolume(mL)Acetone(mg)Filter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)Acetone(mg) Filter (mg)Ace + Filter(mg)Organic(mg)Inorganic(mg)41 Furnace R147.00 5.70 9.10 1.60 5.80 5.709.1014.80 0.60 4.8041 Furnace R245.00 7.50 4.10 1.80 7.70 7.504.1011.60 0.80 6.7041 Furnace R344.00 5.40 3.20 1.50 8.80 5.403.208.60 0.50 7.80Blank57.00 ND 0.30 1.10 1.600.30 0.10 0.60OTM 27/28 PM2.5Lab ResultsOwens CorningBTEC Project No. 10-3990.12Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010Mt. Vernon, OhioCorrected Corrected CorrectedVolume(mL)Acetone(mg)Filter(mg)Acetone(mg) Filter (mg)Ace + Filter(mg)41 Furnace R194.00 94.00 124.00 94.00124.00218.0041 Furnace R273.00 124.00 18.00 124.0018.00142.0041 Furnace R384.00 94.00 91.10 94.0091.10185.10Blank130.00 ND 0.700.70Owens CorningMt. Vernon, OhioBTEC Project No. 10-3990.12Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010Method 5 PM Lab ResultsCompound/FractionBlankResult(μg)BlankDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)Test RunDetectionLimit(μg)Run 1Result(μg)Run 2Result(μg)Run 3Result(μg)FilterCorrectionRun 1Blank-CorrectedResult(μg)Run 2Blank-CorrectedResult(μg)Run 3Blank-CorrectedResult(μg)Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.002.00 2.00 2.00Arsenic 0.79 0.40 7.80 8.30 7.80 2.00 7.80 8.30 7.80 0.797.01 7.51 7.01Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.000.50 0.50 0.50Cadmium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.000.50 0.50 0.50Chromium 2.14 0.30 10.20 8.40 8.50 1.50 10.20 8.40 8.50 2.148.06 6.26 6.36Cobalt ND 0.10 1.86 2.16 0.81 0.50 1.86 2.16 0.81 0.001.86 2.16 0.81Lead 3.50 0.20 9.20 12.10 5.00 1.00 9.20 12.10 5.00 3.505.70 8.60 1.50Manganese 1.14 0.75 18.50 19.60 18.20 3.80 18.50 19.60 18.20 1.1417.36 18.46 17.06Nickle 0.87 0.50 2.70 ND 2.70 2.50 2.70 2.50 2.70 0.872.50 2.50 2.50Selenium ND 1.00 ND ND ND 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.005.00 5.00 5.00Some blank corrected values are below MDL. MDL used for calculations.Uncorrected value (accounting for ND)41 FurnaceSampling Date: September 28-30, 2010Method 29 Non-Hg HAP Metals Lab ResultsOwens CorningMt. Vernon, OhioBTEC Project No. 10-3990.12Corrected Corrected CorrectedRun 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1 Run 2 Run 341 Furnace0.90 0.80 0.700.20 0.10 0.00MDL0.40 0.30 0.30Blank H2ONDBlank KOH 0.70Blank corrected values are below MDL. MDL used for calculations.Method 0061 Lab ResultsMt. Vernon, OhioBTEC Project No. 10-3990.12Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010Owens Corning

### Your Project #: 10-3990.12

Site: OWENS

CORNING-MT

VERNON

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/21



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D9275

Received: 2010/10/06, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061)

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. ( 1 ) 5 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/15

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/11

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H J 4 1 9 7 H

J 4 1 9 8 H

J 4 1 9 9 H

J 4 1 9 9

Sampling Date 2010/09/28 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/29

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 260 350 350 1 2299231

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2299237

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2299237

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 0 0 H

J 4 2 0 1 H J 4 2 0 2 H

J 4 2 0 3

Sampling Date 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

COC Number N/A N/A

U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 360 340 2299231 440 300 1 2287483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.7 0.2 2290376

Hydrochloric Acid ug 200 ND 2299237 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2299237 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 0 4 H

J 4 2 0 4 H

J 4 2 0 5 H

J 4 2 0 6

Sampling Date 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

COC Number

U n i t s RUN RUN RDL RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 770 1 690 680 1 2287483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.3 2290376

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4197 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4198 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4199 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4199 D u p Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4200 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4201 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC /SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4202 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4203 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4204 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4204 D u p Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Maxxam ID HJ4205 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4206 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC /SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9275

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2290376 LLE Matrix Spike

(HJ4204) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 104 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 102 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 NC % 20

2299237 A_S Matrix Spike

(HJ4199) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 110 % 80

- 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 111 % 80

- 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 98 % 90

- 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 100 % 90

- 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.12

Site: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/18



## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D9447

Received: 2010/10/06, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (

2 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) ( 2 ) 4 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM

- 027

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/13

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/10/14

Weight of Water

from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/10/14

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover

pages: 1

Page 1 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H J 4 9 2 7 H

J 4 9 2 8 H

J 4 9 2 9 H

J 4 9 3 0 H

J 4 9 3 3

Sampling Date 2010/09/27 2010/09/28 2010/09/28 2010/09/29 2010/09/27

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

U n i t s TRAIN RUN RUN RUN TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 1-OTM28 2-OTM28 3-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 0.5 2291793

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.30 0.30 2291787

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 57 1 2291795

Weight g 260 220 270 250 0.1 2296252

DCM Weight g 120 210 250 200 0.1 2296251

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.1 1.6 1.8 1.5 0.50 2298280

Organic Condensible PM mg 1.6 5.8 7.7 8.8 1.0 2296249

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H J 4 9 3 4 H

J 4 9 3 5 H

J 4 9 3 6

Sampling Date 2010/09/28 2010/09/28 2010/09/29

COC Number

U n i t s RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-OTM27 2-OTM27 3-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 5.7 7.5 5.4 0.5 2291793

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 9.10 4.10 3.20 0.30 2291787

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 47 45 44 1 2291795

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4927 Collected 2010/09/27

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4928 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4929 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4930 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14

Weight of Water

from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4933 Collected 2010/09/27

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Page 3 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4934 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4935 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4936 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack

Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Page 4 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

GENERAL

COMMENTS

DI water rinse received in plastic bottles.

Sample HJ4928-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HJ4929-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HJ4930-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material with black particles found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9447

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2291793 BLM Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2296249 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 95 % 70

- 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 94 % 70

- 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 1.1 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2298280 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank

matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6

### Your Project #: 10-3990.12

Site: OWENS

CORNING-MT. VERNON

Attention: Barry

Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/21



## CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D9291

Received: 2010/10/06, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack

Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) ( 1 ) 4 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) ( 1 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/14 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/13

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation



### Encryption

Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 8 1 H

J 4 2 8 2 H

J 4 2 8 3 H

J 4 2 8 4

Sampling Date 2010/09/30 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 94.0 109 127 0.5 2291764

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.70 124 118 91.1 0.30 2291763

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 130 94 73 84 1 2291767

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 8 1 H

J 4 2 8 2 H

J 4 2 8 2 H

J 4 2 8 3 H

J 4 2 8 4

Sampling Date 2010/09/30 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND ND 2.0 2300132

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.79 0.40 7.8 7.9 8.3 7.8 2.0 2300132

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.50 2300132

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.50 2300132

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 2.14 0.30 10.2 8.5 8.4 8.5 1.5 2300132

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 1.86 1.62 2.16 0.81 0.50 2300132

Total Lead (Pb) ug 3.50 0.20 9.2 9.3 12.1 5.0 1.0 2300132

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.14 0.75 18.5 19.1 19.6 18.2 3.8 2300132

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.87 0.50 2.7 3.2 ND 2.7 2.5 2300132

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 ND ND ND ND 5.0 2300132

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4281 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4282 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4282 D u p Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2300132 2010/10/20 2010/10/19 N_R

Maxxam ID HJ4283 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4284 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1 /MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Page 4 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except HJ4281, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HJ4282.

Sample HJ4282 was reanalysed for Mn 2010/10/20, due to high RSD

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9291

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2291764 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/10/14 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2300132 N_R Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 105 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 4.9 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 95 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 92 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 3.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 99 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 102 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 102 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 102 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 100 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 100 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 100 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 101 % 70

- 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 100 % 70

- 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 102 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 103 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 1.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 101 % 85

- 115

Page 6 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9291

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2300132 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 102 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 1.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 94 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 97 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 4.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 99 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 98 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 99 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 1.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 101 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 1.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 98 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 99 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 102 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 1.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 99 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 102 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 3.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 100 % 85

- 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 102 % 85

- 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 1.5 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Page 7 of 8

### BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON



### Quality Assurance Report

(Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9291

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2300132 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

RPD

- Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 17.9 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 0.8 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 8 of 8

### Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other



## Client Name 

# BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental101110 Report



## Date

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072 (972)-931-7127

**Trap I.D. Test Location**  **Date Analyzed Scientist**  **Mass ng**

**Sect.1 Mass ng** 

**Sect.2 Spike** 

**Level % Spike** 

**Recovery Date(s) in** 

**Stack Comments** 

70657 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 14.7 0.10 9/28/2010 Run 3, Trap A

70603 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 24.4 0.17 10 9/28/2010 Run 3, Trap B

70628 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 15.0 0.07 9/28/2010 Run 2, Trap A

70638 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 25.0 0.33 10 9/28/2010 Run 2, Trap B

70562 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 14.6 0.18 9/28/2010 Run 1, Trap A

67135 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 33.5 0.26 20 9/28/2010 Run 1, Trap B

70664 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.17 0.14 9/28/2010 Field Blank, Trap A

67128 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 19.0 0.27 20 9/28/2010 Field Blank, Trap B

Variability +- 10% Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Calibration Report Available Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less

than the lowest detection limit. 

## Plant/Source 

# Owens Corning Mt Vernon 

# Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

10/11/2010