alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CGFD43 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 9, 2022

Peter D. Russin

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−20206−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Annetta McCalla

1251 NW 51 Ave.

Lauderhill, FL 33313

SSN: xxx−xx−1546

Curtis McNeal

1251 NW 51 Ave.

Lauderhill, FL 33313

SSN: xxx−xx−2479

ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION AND DISMISSING CHAPTER 13 CASE

 This case came before the court for confirmation of a proposed chapter 13 plan. Based on the record,

it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Confirmation of the proposed chapter 13 plan is denied.

2. This case is dismissed.

Page 1 of 2

Case 21-20206-PDR Doc 38 Filed 02/09/22 Page 1 of 2
3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

4. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

5. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, Federal Building, 299

E Broward Blvd, Room 112, Ft Lauderdale FL 33301, $0.00 for the balance of the filing fee as

required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the trustee shall be applied to this

balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code,

and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by the court. The court will not entertain

a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion

is filed.

6. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with

the requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

7. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept for

filing any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior order

of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments

and filing fees remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 21-20206-PDR Doc 38 Filed 02/09/22 Page 2 of 2
Arthur A. GENOVESE, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jack MCFARLAND, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW and Florida Department of Corrections, Appellees.

No. 1D17-1532

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3942- 21

DE PASQUALE COLOUR & DESIGN, INC., d/b/a DE PASQUALE THE SPA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Respondent.

_____________________________

Submitted March 18, 2024

– Decided March 25, 2024

Before Judges Mawla and Chase.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Docket No. L -0 470

- 22.

Ferrara Law Group, P.C., attorneys for appellant (R alph Peter Ferrara and Kevin Ja mes Kotch, of counsel and on the briefs).

Connell Foley, LLP, and Julie E. Nevins (Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP) of the Florida bar, admitted p ro hac vice, attorneys for respondent (Jonathan P hilip McHenry

, Julie E. Nevins, Evan David Haggerty, of counsel and on the brief).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court. " Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parti es in the case and its use in other cases is limite d. R. 1:36- 3.2 A- 3942

- 21

PER CURIAM

We have been advised that this matter has been amic ably adjusted and the

parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this ap peal. Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-25128]



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 5270]]



FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Statement of Policy for Section 19 of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act

Correction

    Editorial Note: This correction was inadvertently removed from 
the issue of Friday, January 25, 2008. As a result, it is being 
printed in its entirety.
    In notice document E7-25128 appearing on page 73823 in the issue of 
Friday, December 28, 2007, make the following corrections:
    1. In the third column, in the first full paragraph, in the second 
line, footnote 1 is corrected to read as set forth below:
    ``\1\ Pub.L. 109[dash]351, Sec. 710''.
    2. In the same column, in the first full paragraph under the 
heading ``A. Scope of Section 19'', the text is corrected to read as 
set forth below:
    Section 19 covers institution-affiliated parties, as defined by 12 
U.S.C. 1813(u), and others who are participants in the conduct of the 
affairs of an insured institution.\1\ * * *
    \1\ This Statement of Policy applies only to insured depository 
institutions and their institution-affiliated parties. In addition 
to the requirement to file an application with the FDIC, such 
individuals may also need to comply with any filing requirements 
established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 
under 12 U.S.C. Sec.  1829(d), in the case of a bank holding 
company, or with the Office of Thrift Supervision under 12 U.S.C. 
Sec.  1829(e), in the case of a savings and loan holding company.

[FR Doc. Z7-25128 Filed 1-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12.01:  Ratio of earning (loss) to fixed charges



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     Nine Months
                                                      Year Ending December 31,         Ending      Year Ending
                                              -----------------------------------   December 31,   December 31,
                                                 1996          1997        1998         1999          2000
                                              ----------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------
<S>     <C>
Earnings:
    Income (loss) from continuing
        operations before taxes                   6,440        7,110       3,055         11,182       (6,801)
    (Income) loss from equity investees              --           --          --             --           --
    Fixed Charges                                 5,596        5,330       6,509         27,268       43,569
                                              ----------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------
                                                 12,036       12,440       9,564         38,450       36,768

Fixed charges:
    Interest expensed                             5,004        4,672       5,489         23,150       38,001
    Interest capitalized                             --           --          --             --           --
    Amortized premiums, discounts,
        capital expenses related to
        indebtedness                                 61           62         226          1,438        1,971
    Estimated interest within
        rental expense                              531          596         794          2,680        3,597
                                              ----------   ----------   ---------    -----------    ---------
           Total fixed charges                    5,596        5,330       6,509         27,268       43,569

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 2.15 x       2.33  x     1.47 x         1.41 x       0.84 x
                                              ==========   ==========   =========    ===========    =========
</TABLE>
Heidi STEPHENS, M.D., Petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA; Board of Trustees of the University of South Florida, and Charles Lockwood, M.D., in his official capacity as Senior Vice President for USF Health, Respondents.

Case No. 2D17-3753

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

49726

Vol. 62, No. 184

Tuesday, September 23, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 440

[MB-071-F]

RIN 0938-AH00

Medicaid Program; Coverage of

Personal Care Services

Correction

In rule document 97–24266 beginning

on page 47896, in the issue of Thursday,

September 11, 1997, make the following

correction:

On page 47896, in the first column, in

the EFFECTIVE DATE section,

‘‘November 10, 1977’’ should read

‘‘November 10, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Inventory Completion for

Native American Human Remains and

Associated Funerary Objects from the

Illinois counties of La Salle, Madison,

Perry, and Randolph in the Possession

of the Anthropology Section, Illinois

State Museum, Springfield, IL

Correction

In notice document 97–24375,

beginning on page 48303 in the issue of

Monday, September 15, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 48304, in the third column,

beginning in the seventh line from the

end, ‘‘[thirty days after publication in

the Federal Register]’’ should read

‘‘October 15, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled

Substances; Notice of Registration

Correction

In notice document 97–22570

appearing on page 45274, in the issue of

Tuesday, August 26, 1997, the heading

is corrected to read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCO ANTONIO GALDINO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74013

Agency No. A097-375-403

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2011** 

Pasadena, California

Before: ALARCÓN, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Marco Antonio Galdino, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

his removal proceedings to permit him to reapply for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We affirm the BIA’s

FILED

FEB 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

denial of Galdino’s motion to reopen because the BIA’s denial was not arbitrary,

irrational, or contrary to law. Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002).

A motion to reopen must be filed “within 90 days of the date of entry of a

final administrative order of removal.” 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C)(i). An

exception to the 90-day deadline for filing motions to reopen exists for cases

involving a change in country circumstances. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). The law of this circuit requires that a successive and

untimely asylum application must satisfy the requirements for a motion to reopen

and the stringent change in country circumstances exception. Chen v. Mukasey,

524 F.3d 1028, 1033-34 (9th Cir. 2008); accord Lin v. Holder, 588 F.3d 981, 985,

989 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Galdino’s motion was not filed within 90 days of the date of the BIA’s

affirmance of the IJ’s order denying relief and ordering Galdino removed. The

BIA did not err in ruling that Galdino’s motion to reopen was untimely, nor did it

err in concluding that the evidence in support of Galdino’s motion failed to present

persuasive evidence showing a change in country circumstances sufficient to

warrant reopening beyond the statutory 90-day limitations period for motions to

reopen. Although the evidence before the BIA was sufficient to show that

homosexuals and transvestites are subjected to abuse and even murder in Brazil, it
3

did not indicate that those conditions arose or materially worsened after the

conclusion of Galdino’s removal proceedings. Galdino has also not demonstrated

that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the 90-day limitations period because he

has failed to present any evidence that he was prevented from filing due to

deception, fraud, or error. See Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.

2003).

Accordingly, the petition for review of the BIA’s denial of Galdino’s motion

to reopen is DENIED.
Scott Clayton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - products_publications(4)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(18)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(17)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(14)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)south dakota(17)

## By Year

Podcasts        November 20, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 108 – Landsat 8’s 100th Drag Make-Up Maneuver

Podcasts        May 6, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 118 – Preparing for Landsat Next, Part 2

Podcasts        May 27, 2022        Eyes on Earth Episode 75 – Mapping Dust Sources Worldwide

Podcasts        April 8, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 116 – Landsat Images the Twilight Zone

Podcasts        April 22, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 117 – Preparing for Landsat Next, Part 1

Podcasts        March 25, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 115 – EROS Women in Science

Podcasts        October 21, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 6 - Satellites 101

Podcasts        June 3, 2022        Eyes on Earth Episode 76 – ECOSTRESS and Disease Risk

Podcasts        November 16, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 8 – Assessing America’s Cropland

Podcasts        December 18, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 110 – Geospatial Information Response Team

Podcasts        August 28, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 102 – LANDFIRE 2022 Update

Podcasts        January 9, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 87 - Landsat 5's Significance, Part 1

Podcasts        May 23, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 94 – EROS 50th: Collaborations with SDSU

Podcasts        November 21, 2022        Eyes on Earth Episode 84 - Hurricane Disturbance Mapping

Podcasts        December 16, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 12 – Plant Health via Satellite (NDVI)

Podcasts        July 31, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 99 – EROS 50th: Interns Who Stayed

Podcasts        November 16, 2020        Eyes on Earth Episode 38 – Time Series Analysis with Landsat
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 28 35

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e ,

v.
W il li am Dean Cam

pb el l,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

.

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - St . Jo se ph

__

__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Apri l 9 , 20 19 Fi le d: May 3, 20 19 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, W OLLMAN, and KELLY , Cir cu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

W il li am Cam

pb el l di rect ly ap pe al s the se nte nc e the dis tr ic t co ur t im po se d aft er 1 he pl ead ed gu il ty to a dr

ug of fen se , pu rs ua nt to a pl ea ag reem en t co nt ai ni ng an ap pe al

The Hon or ab le Greg Kay s, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es t e r n 1 Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.waiv er. His co un se l ha s m ov ed t o w i t h d raw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And er s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , ch al le ng in g th e se nt en ce as su bs ta nt iv el y
un reas on ab le

.

W e wil l en fo rce th e ap pe al waiv er in th is cas e be cau se Cam pb el l en te red in to th e pl ea ag reem en t an d th e ap pe al waiv er k no win gl y an d vo lu nt ari ly, h is ch al le ng e to th e se nt en ce fal ls wit hi n th e sc op e o f t h e a p p eal waiv er, an d no m is carr ia ge of jus ti ce wou ld res ul t fro m en fo rci ng th e waiv er. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Sc ot t , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo rev i e w ); Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 88 9- 92 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en ba nc ). Fu rth e r , w e ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e
reco rdun de r Pen so n v

. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d hav e fo un d n o n on -fri vo lo us is su es forap pe al ou ts id e th e sc op e o f th e ap pe al waiv er.

Acco rd in gl y , we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw an d di sm is s th is ap pe al

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

35646

Vol. 63, No. 125

Tuesday, June 30, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. TM98-2-127-002]

Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership;

Notice of Compliance Filing

Correction

In notice document 98–16721,

beginning on page 34370, in the issue of

Wednesday, June 24, 1998, the docket

number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. IC98-2-000; FERC Form 2]

Proposed Information Collection and

Request for Comments

Correction

In notice document 98–16712,

appearing on page 34369, in the issue of

Wednesday, June 24, 1998, the docket

number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project Nos. 3721-001, 4270-001, 4282-001,

4312-001, 4628-001, 4738-002 and 9231-000]

Puget Sound Power & Light Company,

Mountain Rhythm Resources,

Mountain Water Resources, Watersong

Resources, McGrew and Associates

and City of Tacoma, Washington,

McGrew, McMaster and Koch and City

of Tacoma, Washington, and Scott

Paper Company; Notice of Motion for

Declaratory Order

Correction

In notice document 98–16715,

beginning on page 34372, in the issue of

June 24, 1998, the docket number

should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

[USCG–1998–3350]

Public Workshops for Response Plan

Equipment Caps: Scheduled Increases

in Mechanical Recovery and Potential

Changes to Dispersant Planning

Requirements

Correction

In notice document 98–16780,

beginning on page 34500 in the issue of

Wednesday, June 24, 1998, in the third

column, under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT:, in the

eighth line ‘‘jcapliscomdt.uscg.mil’’

should read ‘‘jcaplis@comdt.uscg.mil’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Anthony GREER, Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Samantha P. WRIGHT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2806

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10-a


To: Nordea Bank AB (publ) (the “Purchaser”)
8 June 2017
Dear Sirs,
Extension of a receivables purchase agreement between the Purchaser and ourselves as Seller dated 18 June 2012 as amended and extended from time to time, (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”).
We refer to the Receivables Purchase Agreement. We write to record the terms and conditions upon which the parties have agreed to extend the Receivables Purchase Agreement. 
In the definition of Termination Event, sub-clause (a) which appears in Clause 1 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the reference to “five (5) years “ shall be replaced by “ten (10) years”, which, for the avoidance of doubt, means that the Receivables Purchase Agreement will terminate on 18 June 2022. 
Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained in this Letter of Agreement by signing and returning the enclosed duplicate.
Yours faithfully,
for and on behalf of 
MERITOR HEAVY VEHICLES SYSTEMS CAMERI S.P.A.
By: /s/ Gian Luca Alberti     
Name: Gian Luca Alberti 
Title: Managing Director
By: /s/ Marco Signini         
Name: Marco Signini 
Title: Controller
We accept the terms and conditions set out in the Letter of Agreement of which the foregoing is the duplicate.
for and on behalf of  
Nordea Bank AB (publ)
By: /s/ Rasmus Nissen Hald     
Name: Rasmus Nissen Hald 
Title: Director
By: /s/ Peter Brink Jensen     
Name: Peter Brink Jensen 
Title: Director
for and on behalf of 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited







By: /s/ Michael Lombardi     
Name: Michael Lombardi 
Title: Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plastipak Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael J. Plotzke, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that based on my knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                            /s/ Michael J. Plotzke
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Michael J. Plotzke
                                            Chief Financial Officer of
                                            Plastipak Holdings, Inc.
                                            January 28, 2005