alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

JUAN JOSE PEREZ MIER CASE NO. 20-13622-RAM

AKA JUAN PEREZ MIER CHAPTER 13

AKA JUAN J PEREZ MIER

AKA JUAN JOSE PEREZ

AKA JUAN PEREZ

AKA JUAN J PEREZ

Debtor.

_______________________________/

OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN 

Creditor, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, objects to confirmation and states:

1. Creditor is the lienholder on the title to the following vehicle: 

2016 Nissan Rogue 2WD; 

VIN: KNMAT2MTXGP639449 (“Vehicle”)

2. Creditor filed Proof of Claim 3-1 in the total amount of $17,599.15. 

3. The Debtor’s Plan proposes to value Creditor’s secured claim on the Vehicle to 

$6,500.00, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §506.

4. Creditor believes the replacement value of the Vehicle is higher than stated in the 

Plan, specifically $13,725.00, pursuant to the N.A.D.A. Official Used Car Guide attached hereto 

as Exhibit “A” and the Court’s reasoning in In re Hauser, 405 BR 684 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009) 

(Olson, J.) and In re Ortiz, 2007 WL 1176019 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2007) (Ray, J.).

5. Notwithstanding the above, if an agreement cannot be reached amicably between 

the parties as to the value of the Vehicle, Creditor will conduct an appraisal of the Vehicle prior to 

an evidentiary hearing. 

Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 20 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, Creditor, respectfully requests the Court sustain this Objection and for 

such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Creditor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via CM/ECF notice and 

first-class mail to the parties below this 6th day of May 2020. 

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Juan Jose Perez Mier 

97 E 47 Street 

Hialeah, FL 33013 

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE 

Robert Sanchez, Esq 

355 W 49 St. 

Hialeah, FL 33012 

Nancy K. Neidich 

POB 279806 

Miramar, FL 33027 

U.S. Trustee

Office of the US Trustee 

51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

Suite 1204 

Miami, FL 33130

Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 20 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 2
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 19, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00810

- CR
MODESTO CASTILLO , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199

- 82117

- 2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Fillmore and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore Modesto Castillo was convicted of aggra vated assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment on June 1, 2015 . Appellant filed a motion for new trial
on June 11, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 21.4(a) (motion for new trial due within 30 days of date sentence imposed or suspen ded in open court). The trial court granted appellant’s motion for

new trial by written order dated June 29, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 21.8(a), (b) (trial court order granting motion for new trial must be written and entered within 75 days of date senten ce imposed or suspended in open court). An order granting a motion for new trial re store s the case to its posture prior to trial, and the judgment is no longer in place to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 21.9(b); Waller v. State , 931
S.W.2d 640, 643

– 44 (Tex. App.

–– Dallas 1996, no pet.). Absent a judgment of conviction or– 2

– other appealable order, there is nothing before the Court over which we have jurisdiction. See Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

–– Dallas 1998, no pet.). We dismiss the appeal f or want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47

150810F.U05 /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MODESTO CASTILLO, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 00810

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199

- 82117

- 2014. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Chief Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 19th day of October, 2015.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(82)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image(12)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_video(30)
              - multimedia_video-149194(28)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - (-)california(12)
              - colorado(4)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(39)
              - idaho(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - north carolina(8)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Photography        January 8, 2017        Atmospheric River Fills California Rivers with Water and Sediment

Photography        March 20, 2023        Landslides near the 2017 Thomas fire burn area

Photography        December 31, 2022        High flow at USGS streamgage 11172945 on Alameda Creek, California

Charts or Graphs        January 4, 2023        High streamflow measured across California during New Year's storm

Photography        December 31, 2022        Record Flow, Streamgage 11335000 (Cosumnes River at Michigan Bar, CA)

Illustrations        August 23, 2021        Cascadia margin bathymetry

Photography        January 29, 2021        Rat Creek washout on coastal highway

Photography        January 29, 2021        Highway 1 washout at Rat Creek

Photography        January 29, 2021        View of Rat Creek debris flow from above

Illustrations        December 31, 2014        Land Subsidence Due to Decomposition of Organic Soils

Posters        December 31, 1998        Mapping Shipping Hazards in San Francisco Bay, 1997-1998

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2005        Map of the known ash-fall boundaries for several U.S. eruptions
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 55 (Thursday, March 20, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-4245]



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 55 / Thursday, March 20, 2008 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 15049]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-810]


Stainless Steel Bar from India: Notice of Preliminary Results and 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

Correction

    In notice document E8-4245 beginning on page 12382 in the issue of 
Friday, March 7, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 12387 in the second column, in the Dated heading, 
``September 28, 2008.'' should read ``February 28, 2008''.

[FR Doc. Z8-4245 Filed 3-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
WEST BRICKELL PROPERTIES II, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LEKOKE WINES & BITES, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0971

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Ruben PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2203

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Craig JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-143

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Gary JUENGAIN v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2175

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

p0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146075 & (8)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146075

COA: 312206

Lake CC: 00

- 003594

- FC

MARIO SENTELLE CAVIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for

miscella neous relief is DENIED.
OAKWOOD INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Yvonne COLEMAN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NUMBER 13-19-00101-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Relator Rogelio Rodriguez filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay 

in the above cause on March 11, 2019. Relator seeks to compel the recusal or 

disqualification of the Honorable Inna Klein, who is presiding over the trial of the 

underlying case. Relator requests that we stay the trial court proceedings pending 

resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus. The real party in interest, Will Newton, 

M.D., has filed a response in opposition to the petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

to stay. 
2

To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that an underlying 

order is void or a clear abuse of discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists. 

In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In 

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); 

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). We determine 

the adequacy of an appellate remedy by balancing the benefits of mandamus review 

against the detriments. In re Essex Ins. Co., 450 S.W.3d 524, 528 (Tex. 2014) (orig. 

proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 136. As applicable to this 

case, the denial of a motion to recuse can be reviewed only on appeal from a final 

judgment; however, the denial of a motion to disqualify is reviewed by mandamus and 

may be appealed in accordance with other law. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 18a(j); In re O'Connor, 

92 S.W.3d 446, 450 (Tex. 2002) (orig. proceeding); In re Union Pac. Res. Co., 969 S.W.2d 

427, 428 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); In re Wilhite, 298 S.W.3d 754, 757 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, orig. proceeding).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, 

the record and applicable law, the motion for stay, and the response to the petition for writ 

of mandamus and motion for stay, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to 

obtain relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay

without prejudice.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the

11th day of March, 2019.
Exhibit
10.38





AMENDMENT
NUMBER TWO TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT





This
Amendment Number Two is made as of December 30, 2008, to the Employment
Agreement dated as of April 28, 2006 (the “Agreement”), by and between Southern
Community Bank and Trust and Southern Community Financial Corporation and F.
Scott Bauer (“Executive”).





1.  The
Agreement is amended by adding the following Paragraph:





“8.12.   Compliance
with ESSA. To the extent that any payment under this Agreement would
constitute a prohibited parachute payment under Section 111(b)(2)(C) of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), the Employer agrees to
pay Executive an additional payment equal to the prohibited payment on July 1,
2012, or if later, the earliest date when Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA no longer
prohibits such payment.  Such payment shall be made in a single lump
sum in cash, without interest.  The Executive may be entitled to
severance payments from multiple agreements and plans with the
Employer.  The Employer, it its sole discretion, shall determine which
payments shall be delayed in order to comply with
ESSA.   Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the
contrary, the additional amounts due under the Agreement shall not be paid if
the Treasury Department or other governmental agency issues guidance subsequent
to the date of this Agreement that would prohibit such payment.  A
prohibited parachute payment shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent
with Notice 2008-TAAP, Notice 2008-94 and all other current or future guidance
issued  pursuant to Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA or Section 280G(e) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.”





2.  No
other terms and conditions of the Agreement are affected by this
Amendment.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
above.





SOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATIONBy:
              /s/ Jeff T.
      ClarkJeff
      T. Clark, PresidentSOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUSTBy:
              /s/ Jeff T.
      ClarkJeff
      T. Clark, President


EXECUTIVE/s/ F. Scott Bauer
              (SEAL)F.
      Scott Bauer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5223 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5223

        To deauthorize the Salt Creek project in Graham, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2016

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To deauthorize the Salt Creek project in Graham, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SALT CREEK, GRAHAM, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, environmental 
restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek, Graham, Texas, authorized by 
section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(Public Law 106-53; 113 Stat. 278-279), is no longer authorized as a 
Federal project beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Certain Project-Related Claims.--The non-Federal sponsor for 
the project described in paragraph (1) shall hold and save the United 
States harmless from any claim that has arisen, or that may arise, in 
connection with the project.
    (c) Transfer.--The Secretary of the Army is authorized to transfer 
any land acquired by the Federal Government for the project on behalf 
of the non-Federal sponsor that remains in Federal ownership on or 
after the date of enactment of this Act to the non-Federal sponsor.
    (d) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the land that is 
integral to the project described in paragraph (1) ceases to be owned 
by the public, all right, title, and interest in and to the land and 
improvements shall revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Jermaine Leon YOUNG

1160615 (CR-15-1462)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Sam Messina, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Viastar Media Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2004 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial
condition and results of operations of Viastar Media Corporation

Dated:   November 22, 2004          By: /s/ Sam Messina
                                        -----------------------------------
                                            Sam Messina
                                            Interim Chief Financial Officer


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Viastar Media Corporation and will be retained by Viastar Media
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Chapter 11 Cases 

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-13797-SMG 

LPT, LLC, Case No. 21-15537-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER MARYLAND, LLC, Case No. 21-15539-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER DISTRICT OF 

COLUMBIA, LLC, Case No. 21-15540-SMG 

Debtors. (Jointly administered 21-13797-SMG) 

/ 

EXHIBIT REGISTER 

Exhibits Submitted on behalf of: 

[ ] Plaintiff [ ] Defendant [X] Debtor [ ] Other 

Date of Hearing/Trial: June 15, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. 

Type of Hearing/Trial: Hearing on Final Approval of Joint Disclosure Statement, 

Confirmation Hearing and Hearing on Fee Applications 

SUBMITTED BY: 

 VENABLE LLP 

Attorneys for Debtors-in-Possession 

 100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 4400 

 Miami, Florida 33131 

 Telephone: (305) 349-2300 

 Facsimile: (305) 349-2310 

 By: /s/ Paul J. Battista 

 Paul J. Battista, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 884162 

pjbattista@venable.com

Mariaelena Gayo-Guitian, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 813818 

mgguitian@venable.com

Heather L. Harmon 

Florida Bar No. 13192 

 hlharmon@venable.com 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 930 Filed 06/13/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

Exhibit Description Admitted Refused Not 

Introduced 

1 Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation 

Proposed by Liberty Power Holdings, 

LLC, LPT, LLC, Liberty Power 

Maryland, LLC and Liberty Power 

District of Columbia, LLC [ECF No. 

875]

 

2 Joint Disclosure Statement for 

Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation 

Proposed by Liberty Power Holdings, 

LLC, LPT, LLC, Liberty Power 

Maryland, LLC and Liberty Power 

District of Columbia, LLC [ECF No. 

880]

 

3 Debtors’ Expedited Motion to 

Modify Joint Plan of Liquidation 

Dated April 14, 2023 [ECF No. 923]

 

4 Certificate of Proponents of Joint 

Plan on Acceptance of Joint Plan, 

Report on Amount to Be Deposited, 

Certificate of Amount Deposited and 

Payment of Fees [ECF No. 924]

 

5 Declaration of Bob Butler, Chief 

Restructuring Officer, in Support of 

(A) Approval of the Adequacy of 

Debtors’ Disclosure Statement on 

Final Basis, and (B) Confirmation of 

the Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation 

Proposed by Liberty Power Holdings, 

LLC, LPT, LLC, Liberty Power 

Maryland, LLC and Liberty Power 

District of Columbia, LLC [ECF No. 

925]

 

 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 930 Filed 06/13/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.4

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned
officer of True Religion Apparel, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report") that:



|Date: April 30, 2008 |  | By:    | /s/PETER F. COLLINS    
|-------------------- |  | ------ | -----------------------
|                     |  | Name:  | Peter F. Collins       
|                     |  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

### Correction

In notice document E9-10358 appearing on page 21403 in the issue of May 7, 2009, make the following correction:

On page 21403, in the first column, in the second line from the bottom, “Auburn Hills, NI” should read “Auburn Hills, MI”.

[FR Doc. Z9-10358 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE of Louisiana v. Jakauri C. WESLEY

NO. 2018-KH-0570

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).