alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60338

Summary Calendar

 

ROOSEVELT FORD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ISAAC LEE; ANDREW THOMPSON;

CHARLES JONES; FLOYD WILLIAMS,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Mississippi

(2:94-CV-52)

 

February 11, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roosevelt Ford, a Mississippi prisoner (# 42452), appeals from

the judgment for the defendants following a bench trial in his

civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He argues

that the evidence showed that the defendants acted with deliberate

indifference in confiscating his shoes (allegedly causing him to

contract a fungal condition on his feet and legs) and that they

denied him access to the courts.
2

We agree with the district court and the magistrate that Ford

failed to establish his § 1983 claims. Although prison officials

must provide prisoners with medical care and clothing, see Farmer

v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994), to hold prison officials liable

for episodic acts, Ford must demonstrate that they acted with

deliberate indifference, see id. at 847. Ford has not shown that

prison officials knew of a substantial risk of serious harm from

the conditions of the jail floor. Moreover, Ford’s claim must fail

because he did not prove that the prison officials’ alleged failure

to provide him shoes caused the bacterial condition on his leg and

foot. See Hart v. O’Brien, 127 F.3d 424, 446 (5th Cir. 1997). As

to Ford’s access-to-the-courts claim, the magistrate was entitled

to credit the prison officials’ testimony that they routinely

provide access to a law library and would have provided Ford a

stamp to mail his legal filing if he had requested on; similarly,

the magistrate was entitled to discredit Ford’s testimony that the

defendants failed to comply with these policies. See Gibbs v.

King, 779 F.2d 1040, 1046 (5th Cir. 1986).

Ford also contends that the magistrate judge erred in denying

his motion for a continuance, because responses to Ford’s discovery

requests came just a few days before trial. Yet as the lower court

found, Ford failed to demonstrate that the denied continuance

prejudiced his case in any way. Moreover, Ford has not met the

heavy burden for imposing sanctions on the defendants for their

failure to comply with discovery requests. We find no abuse of
3

discretion on these facts. See Dorsey v. Scott Wetzel Serv., Inc.,

84 F.3d 170, 171 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Ackmann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date: November 4, 2008 | By:                                    | /s/ Steven C. Ackmann |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                        | Steven  C. Ackmann,                    |
|                        | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

- 2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

December 9 , 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Conference Call with United Autoworkers to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Proposed

Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty

Vehicles

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0799

This memo documents a conference call held on December 9, 2011 between representatives of

the United Auto Workers (UAW) and EPA to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Proposed Rulemaking

for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty Vehicles

The confe rence call attendees from United Auto Workers included

Barbara Somson and Brad Markell from the UAW participated in the call, and from EPA the

participants included Margo Oge, Chet France, and Bill Charmley

The discussion topic was lim ited to questions from the UAW regarding the upcoming public

hearings for the Joint NPRM.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5022 

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to ensure dislocated 

workers are provided consultation and advice for starting a small business 

as part the rapid response activities for dislocated workers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2016 

Mr. ASHFORD (for himself, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. COSTA, Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN

GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. BERA, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mrs. 

BUSTOS, and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act 

to ensure dislocated workers are provided consultation 

and advice for starting a small business as part the 

rapid response activities for dislocated workers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Individuals 

5 with Reemployment and Entrepreneurial Development 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘HIRED Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5022 IH

1 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS STARTUP CONSULTATION AND 

2 OUTREACH FOR DISLOCATED WORKERS. 

3 Section 3(51) of the Workforce Innovation and Op4 portunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102(51)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period 

7 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(F) assistance to dislocated workers 

10 through increased outreach about small busi11 ness opportunities and consultation about start12 ing a small business.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. FUNDING FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONSULTATION 

14 AFTER A PLANT CLOSING OR MASS LAYOFF. 

15 Section 134(a)(2)(A) of such Act is amended by add16 ing at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(iii) PERMISSIBLE FUNDING AFTER A

18 PLANT CLOSURE OR MASS LAYOFF.—In the 

19 case of a permanent closure of or mass 

20 layoff at a plant, facility, or enterprise, or 

21 a natural or other disaster, that results in 

22 mass job dislocation, in order to assist dis23 located workers in obtaining reemploy24 ment, a State may allocate up to 10 per25 cent of the funds reserved under section 

26 133(a)(2) to provide outreach about small 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 5022 IH

1 business opportunities and consultation 

2 about starting a small business.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
STATE EX REL. Dale MILLER v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0889

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

*893Denied.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
Exhibit 23.1








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board of Directors


Gold Resource Corporation





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-171779on Form S-8 of Gold Resource Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2011 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Resource Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Resource Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/  StarkSchenkein, LLP


StarkSchenkein, LLP


Denver, Colorado


March 14, 2011
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re Case No. 22-10041

Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

Miguel Angel Bolivar

1.

For legal services, I have agreed to accept..................................................................

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received.......................................................

Balance Due...................................................................................................................

$4,650.00 

$4,035.00 

$615.00 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and 

that compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for 

services rendered or to be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case 

is as follows:

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

  Debtor Other (specify)

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

  Debtor Other (specify)

4. 



I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and 

associates of my law firm.

I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with another person or persons who are not members or 

associates of my law firm. A copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the 

compensation, is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in 

bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statements of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

Case 22-10041-AJC Doc 4 Filed 01/04/22 Page 1 of 2
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following services:

CERTIFICATION

Date

01/04/2022 /s/ Christian Paul Larriviere, Esq.

Christian Paul Larriviere, Esq.

/s/ Miguel Angel Bolivar

Miguel Angel Bolivar

Bar No. 571156

Law Offices of Christian Paul Larriviere, P.A.

1250 SW 27th Avenue

Suite 307

Miami, Florida 33135

Phone: (954) 239-7150 / Fax: (954) 874-6110

 I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for 

representation of the debtor(s) in this bankruptcy proceeding.

Case 22-10041-AJC Doc 4 Filed 01/04/22 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(4)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        January 26, 2017        PubTalk 1/2017 — Unusual sources of tsunamis

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Illustrations        August 26, 2012        Vesta Dawn Framing Camera

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00104-CR

Brendon Bolsins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 72200, HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Brendon Bolsins pleaded guilty to the offense of theft. He has now

filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication. However,

the district court has certified that Bolsins has waived his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed

Filed: March 28, 2014

Do Not Publish
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re:

EXCLUSIVE DOORS AND 

WINDOWS, LLC, 

 Debtor.

______________________________________/

Case No. 19-11829-AJC

Chapter 7

 

Adv. Case No. 21-01045-AJC

MARCIA T. DUNN, Chapter 7 Trustee 

of the Bankruptcy Estate of EXCLUSIVE 

DOORS AND WINDOWS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARTA PIMENTEL, an individual, and

DANIEL PIMENTEL, an individual,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH AGREED ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

FROM DEFENDANTS AND FOR SANTIONS (D.E. 63)

Plaintiff, Marcia T. Dunn, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the above referenced bankruptcy estate

(the “Plaintiff” or “Trustee”), by and through counsel, and pursuant to this Court’s Agreed Order 

Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents From Defendants and for 

Sanctions (D.E. 57) (the "Compel Order") [D.E. 63], gives notice that Defendant Marta Pimentel 

and Defendant Daniel Pimentel (collectively, the “Defendants”) have, failed to comply with 

paragraph 2 of the Compel Order and Defendants have not timely produced to the Plaintiff all 

documents responsive to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production to Daniel Pimentel [D.E. 38] and 

First Request for Production to Marta Pimentel [D.E. 40]. 

Accordingly, a hearing regarding the Defendants’ non-compliance and the imposition of 

Case 21-01045-AJC Doc 68 Filed 02/16/22 Page 1 of 2
 Adv. Case No. 21-01045-AJC

2

sanctions against Defendants Marta Pimentel and Daniel Pimentel will be held on March 10, 2022 

at 2:00 pm., by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions. 

To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later 

than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be 

arranged online at www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a 

reservation may also be made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services FREE of 

charge. All attorneys shall advise their clients NOT to appear at the courthouse.

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of February, 2022

DUNN LAW, P.A.

Counsel for Plaintiff, Marcia T. Dunn, Trustee

66 West Flagler Street, Suite 400

Miami, Florida 33130

Tel: 786-433-3866 

Fax: 786-260-0269

jerrod.maddox@dunnlawpa.com

By: /s/ Jerrod M. Maddox 

 Jerrod M. Maddox, Esq.

 Florida Bar No. 117820

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via Notice of 

Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) on this 16th day of February, 2022, upon counsel for Defendants and 

registered users in this case. 

By: /s/ Jerrod M. Maddox 

 Jerrod M. Maddox, Esq.

Case 21-01045-AJC Doc 68 Filed 02/16/22 Page 2 of 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4902 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to expand law enforcement availability 

pay to employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Air and 

Marine Operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2016 

Mr. HURD of Texas (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MCCAUL, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. FARENTHOLD, and Ms. 

MCSALLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to expand law enforcement availability pay to employees of U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection’s Air and Marine Operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AVAILABILITY PAY FOR 

4 EMPLOYEES OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PRO5 TECTION’S AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5545a(i) of title 5, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4902 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘apply to a pilot employed by 

2 the United States Customs Service’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘apply to any employee of the U.S. Customs and 

4 Border Protection’s Air and Marine Operations, or 

5 any successor organization,’’; and 

6 (2) by striking ‘‘such pilot’’ and inserting ‘‘such 

7 employee’’. 

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub9 section (a) shall take effect on the first day of the first 

10 applicable pay period beginning on or after the date that 

11 is 14 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 507 

To allow Members of Congress to decline certain retirement benefits and 

contributions by the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2015 

Mr. NUGENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To allow Members of Congress to decline certain retirement 

benefits and contributions by the Federal Government, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congress is Not a Ca5 reer Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 507 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANTING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS THE OPTION 

2 TO DECLINE CERTAIN BENEFITS. 

3 (a) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

4 OPT OUT.—Section 8401(20) of title 5, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘, and who’’ and all that 

6 follows through ‘‘2004’’. 

7 (b) THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN AGENCY CONTRIBUTION

8 OPT OUT.—Section 8432(c) of such title is amended by 

9 adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(4)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

11 this subsection, contributions under paragraphs (1) 

12 through (3) may not be made in the case of any 

13 Member who makes an election under subparagraph 

14 (B). 

15 ‘‘(B) Any Member may, by written notice to the 

16 official by whom such Member is paid, elect not to 

17 receive contributions under this subsection. An elec18 tion under this subparagraph— 

19 ‘‘(i) shall be effective with respect to pay 

20 periods beginning on or after the date on which 

21 such election is made; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) shall be irrevocable.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - (-)wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileDavid P Krabbenhoft
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LATOYA RENEE HENDERSON,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00174-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Ellis County, Texas

(TC# 1911450CR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Marquis Jarvis RIDDLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4985

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Wildfire, fuels reduction, and herpetofaunas across diverse landscape mosaics in northwestern forests      

      January 1, 2004    

The herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles) of northwestern forests (U.S.A.) is diverse, and many species are locally abundant. Most forest amphibians west of the Cascade Mountain crest are associated with cool, cascading streams or coarse woody material on the forest floor, which are characteristics of mature forests. Extensive loss and fragmentation of habitat resulted from logging across approximately 50% of old-growth forests in northern California and approximately 80% of stands in Oregon and Washington. There is a complex landscape mosaic and overlap of northern and southern biotic elements in the Klamath-Siskiyou Region along the Oregon and California border, creating a biodiversity hotspot. The region experiences many low-severity fires annually, punctuated by periodic major fires, including the Biscuit fire, the largest in North America in 2002. In the fire's northern portion, severe fire occurred on >50% of stands of young, managed trees but on only about 25–33% of old-growth stands. This suggests that the legacy of timber harvest may produce fire-prone stands. Calls for prescribed fire and thinning to reduce fuel loads will remove large amounts of coarse woody material from forests, which reduces cover for amphibians and alters nutrient inputs to streams. Our preliminary evidence suggests no negative effects of wildfire on terrestrial amphibians, but stream amphibians decrease following wildfire. Most reptiles are adapted to open terrain, so fire usually improves their habitat. Today, the challenge is to maintain biodiversity in western forests in the face of intense political pressures designed to 'prevent' catastrophic fires. We need a dedicated research effort to understanding how fire affects biota and to proactively investigate outcomes of fuel-reduction management on wildlife in western forests.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Washington

View All **