alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

IN RE: 

SAMUEL F. WORRELL Case No.:21-20622-PDR 

Debtor Chapter 13 

DEBTOR’S REQUEST FOR THIS COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THESE 

FACTS IN THIS CASE. 

Pursuant to Rule 12(a) and Florida evidence code ss 90.202(6), Samuel F Worrell moves 

this court to take judicial Notice of The Law Firm Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & 

Partners, PLLC. abuse of process, and Malicious Prosecution complaint in the case of 

Samuel F Worrell vs. Ditech Financial LLC. And New Rez LLC 

On 11/08/2021 Law Firm Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC. 

advertised Plaintiff’s Homestead for sale claiming that Ditech Financial LLC. was the 

Secured Creditor of the Property. 

On April 21st, 2020 Law Firm Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane, & Partners, PLLC. 

represented to this Court that New Rez LLC. was the Secured Creditors for this property 

by filing a Proof Of Claim on this property contrary to what they said in State Court. 

Once again on January, 12th, 2022 Law Firm Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane, & 

Partners, PLLC. represented to this court that New Rez was the Secured Creditor in this 

case, again by filing a Proof Of Claim in this case, and contradicting what they had 

previously stated in State Court. 

Law Firm Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC. should be barred 

pursuant to the doctrine of Judicial Estoppel, from changing tunes in this Court and for 

lying to the Courts by claiming that two completely different entities are the Sole Secure 

Creditor for this Homestead. 

According to Florida State Law it is impossible, the law actually prohibits legal assignment 

of a foreclosed mortgage AFTER a final foreclosure judgment is entered against the 

property. 

Respectfully Submitted 

/s/Samuel Worrell 

Samuel F Worrell 

Dated / Signed: Thursday, 10th March 2022. 

- 1 - 

Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 54 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of this filing was furnished to the parties listed on the service 

list below, via United States Postal Service (USPS) ‘First Class Mail’, and / or E-mailed in 

accordance with the corresponding addresses listed therein, on the 10th day of March 2022. 

Signed: /s/Samuel Worrell 

SAMUEL WORRELL PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR, pro se. 

7420 N.W. 41 COURT., LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA 33319 

Dated / Signed: Thursday, 10th March 2022. 

SERVICE LIST 

ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC 

Attorneys for Ditech Financial Servicing, LLC, 

Attorneys for NewREZ LLC, 

6409 Congress Ave, Suite100 

Boca Raton, Florida, 33487 

Attn: Marni Sachs 

Marni Sachs, Esquire 

Attn: Scott Brown 

Scott Brown, Esquire 

Florida Bar No.88187 

Attn:April Harriott 

Florida Bar: 37547 

Communication Email: sbrown@raslg.com

- 1 - 

Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 54 Filed 03/10/22 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Systems-deposits-commodities-critical minerals table for the earth mapping resources initiative      

      January 1, 2020    

View Report

Version History

To define and prioritize focus areas across the United States with resource potential for 35 critical minerals in a few years’ time, the U.S Geological Survey Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI) required an efficient approach to streamline workflow. A mineral systems approach based on current understanding of how ore deposits that contain critical minerals form and relate to broader geologic frameworks and the tectonic history of the Earth was used to satisfy this Earth MRI need. This report describes the rationale for, and structure of, a table developed for Earth MRI that relates critical minerals and principal commodities to the deposit types and mineral systems in which they are concentrated. The hierarchical relationship between systems, deposits, commodities, and critical minerals makes it possible to define and prioritize each system-based focus area once for all of the critical minerals that it may contain. This approach is advantageous because mineral systems are much larger than individual ore deposits and they generally have geologic features that can be “imaged” by the topographic, geologic, geochemical, and geophysical mapping techniques deployed by Earth MRI.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Albert H Hofstra

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ahofstra@usgs.gov

303-236-5530

#### Douglas C Kreiner

##### Research Economic Geologist

Alaska Science Center

dkreiner@usgs.gov

907-786-7190

## Related Content

#### Albert H Hofstra

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ahofstra@usgs.gov

303-236-5530

#### Douglas C Kreiner

##### Research Economic Geologist

Alaska Science Center

dkreiner@usgs.gov

907-786-7190

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200
Exhibit














                                                                   	
	
	

Hardinge Inc.
One Hardinge Drive
Elmira, NY  14902-1507 USA


p. 607.734.2281
sales 800.843.8801
sales fax 607.734.8819


www.hardinge.com








June 1, 2017


Dear Randy, 




I am pleased to extend the following offer to you for the position of Senior Vice President, Corporate Development for Hardinge Inc. reporting to me. Your effective start date will be June 3rd, 2017. The following details the compensation and benefits as part of this offer:


		
	1.
	Commencing on the effective date the Executive shall be paid an annual Base Salary of $275,000, payable in accordance with the Company's payroll practices.




		
	2.
	Executive shall be included to the extent eligible thereunder in all employee benefit plans, programs, or arrangements (including plans, programs, or arrangements providing for retirement benefits, disability benefits, health and life insurance, or vacation and paid holidays) which shall be established by the Company for, or made available to, its senior executives generally.




		
	3.
	The Executive will be provided an automobile allowance in the amount of $1,000 per month, and not less than 3 weeks' vacation per calendar year.




		
	4.
	The Executive shall be eligible to receive awards under the Company's Cash Incentive and Stock Incentive Compensation plans. The Executive1s annual target award under the Company1s Cash Incentive and Stock Incentive Compensation plans shall be 50% of Base Salary. Awards under the Company's Cash Incentive Plan and Stock Incentive Plan shall be determined at the discretion of the Board, and may be subject to attainment of performance targets and objectives determined by the Board.




		
	5.
	Within (30) Days following the Effective Start date, the Executive will receive an Initial Option Grant of 75,000 non-qualified stock options under the Company's stock incentive compensation plan. The stock options will be subject to the following vesting requirements:


		
	•
	18,750 options vest on two year anniversary of Effective Start date, provided Executive is then employed by the Company


		
	•
	18,750 options vest on three year anniversary of the Effective Start date, provided Executive is then employed by the Company


		
	•
	37,500 options subject to performance vesting:


		
	o
	performance criteria to be determined prior to option grant; will include long term and short term parameters











We look forward to you joining the Hardinge executive leadership team!






Regards,
Charles P. Dougherty
President I Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X99-10122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 679


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska

CFR Correction

    In Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 600 to End, 
revised as of Oct. 1, 1998, on page 440, first column, Sec. 679.2 is 
corrected by adding paragraph (2) to the definition of Catcher vessel 
to read as follows:


Sec. 679.2  Definitions.

 * * * * *
    Catcher vessel means:
    (1) * * *
    (2) (Applicable through December 31, 1998). With respect to 
moratorium groundfish, as defined in paragraph (1) of this definition; 
with respect to moratorium crab species, a vessel that is used to 
catch, take, or harvest moratorium crab species that are retained on 
board as fresh fish product at any time.
 * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 General Services Administration 41 CFR Part 302-17
[FTR Amendment 2008-03; FTR Case 2008-302; Docket 2008-002, Sequence 1]
RIN 3090-AI48


Correction In rule document E8-10022 beginning on page 25539 in the issue of Wednesday, May 7, 2008 make the following corrections: On page 25542, in Part 302-17, under Appendix D to Part 302-17,the tables should read as set forth below: Appendix D to Part 302-17—[Corrected] Puerto Rico Marginal Tax Rates by Earned Income Level—Tax Year 2007
[Use the following table to compute the RIT allowance for Puerto Rico taxes, as prescribed in 302-17.8(e)(4)(i), on taxable reimbursements received during calendar year 2007.]
Marginal tax rate
For married person living with spouse and filing jointly, married person not living with spouse, single person, or head of householdPercent
Over
But not over7%
$2,000
$17,00014% + 1,190
17,000
30,00025% + 3,010
30,000
50,00033% + 8,010
50,000
 Marginal tax rate
For married person living with spouse and filing 
                             separatelyPercent
Over
But not over7%
$1,000
$8,50014% + $595
8,500
15,00025% + 1,505
15,000
25,00033% + 4,005
25,000Source: Individual Income Tax Return 2007—Long Form; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of the Treasury, P.O. Box 9022501, San Juan, PR 00902-2501; 
                        *http://www.hacienda.gobierno.pr/​*.


[FR Doc. Z8-10022 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
To the Board of Directors of Lennar Partners, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion about Lennar Partners, Inc.'s (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)*as applicable to the special servicing of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum-servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche

February 15, 2002
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-155644) and related Prospectus of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. pertaining to equity securities of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (as issuer of common units representing limited partnership interests) and debt of SunocoLogistics Partners Operations L.P. (as issuer of debt securities), and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96897) pertaining to the Sunoco Partners LLC Long-Term Incentive Plan of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. of our reports datedFebruary 23, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., and the parent-company-only balance sheet of SunocoPartners LLC included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

February 23, 2010
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)

## By Year

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Request Form

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cuttings Sampling Protocol

Science Snippet        June 3, 2016        EarthView–Eye of the Sahara
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Surface water supply of the United States, 1961-65, Part 15. Alaska      

      January 1, 1971    

View Document

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
EXHIBIT 99.2

                              BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Moon Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Norman J. Birmingham, the Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ NORMAN J. BIRMINGHAM
----------------------------------------
Norman J. Birmingham
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Accounting Officer)
November 6, 2002

The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
K.E., A CHILD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3494

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
F.W.J., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Southern Community Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Winston-Salem, North Carolina

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-76930 and 333-76392) on Forms S-8 of Southern Community Financial
Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 17, 2003 with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of Southern Community Financial Corporation
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report
on Form 10-K of Southern Community Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries.

/s/ Dixon Odom PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina
March 24, 2003
STATE EX REL. Walter REED v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0947

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Denied; moot. See R.S. 15:574.4(H).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Irwin Williamson,  Chief Financial Officer of TechAlt,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the period
ended  September 30, 2004 which this  certification  accompanies  fully complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Irwin Williamson
---------------------------------------
Irwin Williamson,
Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to TechAlt, Inc. and will be retained by TechAlt, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ORIGINAI 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0471 

BRENDA ZASTOUPIL, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, 

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS 

BOARD, AND RYAN RESTAURANT 

CORPORATION, 

Respondents and Appellees. 

ORDER 

FILED 

MAR - 6 2024 

Bowen C., reenvvood 

Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 

Upon consideration of Appellant's second motion for extension of time to file her 

reply brief and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time until 

March 13, 2024, to file her reply brief. 

No further extensions will be granted. 

DATED this-1. day of March, 2024. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

03/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0471
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(22)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - (-)wyoming(1)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery
Mohammad MOSTAJABIAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Behrokh AHMADI, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2989

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appellate attorneys' fees is denied.

Appellate attorneys' fees is remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 61215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-20848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Privacy Act of 1974: New System of Records

Correction

    In notice document E7-20848 beginning on page 60396 in the issue of 
Wednesday, October 24, 2007, make the following correction:
    The above document should not have printed in the Federal Register 
of Wednesday, October 24, 2007.

[FR Doc. Z7-20848 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
AAM-13-156-E 

January 29, 2013 

 Exemption No. 10277A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0538 

Ms. Doreen K. Brandt 

Human Resource Manager 

Fargo Jet Center, Inc. 

3802 20th Street, North 

Fargo, ND 58102 

Dear Ms. Brandt: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10277. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 4, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Fargo Jet Center, Inc. (Fargo Jet Center), for an extension of Exemption No. 10277. 

That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows 

Fargo Jet Center, which is operating under separate parts of the regulation, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Fargo Jet Center. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10277 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Fargo Jet Center are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Fargo Jet Center part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10277 to June 30, 2015, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 8 Filed 08/02/21 Page 7 of 7