alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-12-296-E April 11, 2012

Exemption No. 10501 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0380

Mr. Thomas Davis Crystal Aero Group, Inc.

P.O. Box 2050 Crystal River, FL 34423

Dear Mr. Davis:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Crystal Aero Group, Inc. (Crystal Aero Group), for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Crystal Aero Group, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Crystal Aero Group.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Crystal Aero Group, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Crystal Aero Group, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Crystal Aero Group are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Crystal Aero Group part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Dorothy Pierre Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 1,603.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 1,603.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

December 1, 2021 /s/ Clare A. Casas

Date Clare A. Casas 663239

Signature of Attorney

Bankruptcy Law Firm of Clare Casas, P.A.

7450 Griffin Road, Suite 260

Davie, FL 33314

954-327-5700 Fax: 954-727-9976

clarecasas@ombankruptcy.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-21400-PDR Doc 5 Filed 12/01/21 Page 1 of 1
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed 

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Juan Jose Perez Mier 20-13622 RAM 5/11/20 ✔ 2018-2019 Photo ID/SS card Missing 2016(B) ✔ ✔ IVL Valuation motion not filed ✔

CL#3 Nissan Motor ✔ Amend plan to include Child supp info. ✔ FMV for Firearms ✔ #4348 (1/15-3/17) ✔

✔ ✔ ✔

✔ ✔

Affidavit of support LF 90 LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity✔ Missing signed copy of the Attorney's Declaration

Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 22 Filed 05/14/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric Stoppenhagen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Eric Stoppenhagen



Eric Stoppenhagen

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer



December 13, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - 38 CFR Part 21
          - RIN 2900-AL44

      ( print page 31742)    

### Correction

§ 21.3041

In rule document E8-11726 beginning on page 30486 in the issue of Wednesday, May 28, 2008, make the following correction:

On page 30491, in the second column, in § 21.3041(i)(3)(iii), the authority citation “(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3512(A)(3), (A)(4))” should read “(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3512(a)(3), (a)(4))”.

[FR Doc. Z8-11726 Filed 6-2-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 10.6(c)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





 


This Amendment No. 3
to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated August 3, 2017, is by and between Drone Aviation Holding Corp.,
a Nevada corporation with an address 11651 Central Parkway #118, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (the “Company”), and
Kendall Carpenter (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered
into an Employment Agreement on May 18, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered
into an Amendment No. 1 on April 27, 2016 (Carpenter Amendment No. 1); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered
into an Amendment No. 2 on September 26, 2016 (Carpenter Amendment No. 2); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish
to further amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below, with the understanding that all other provisions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain unchanged;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.          Section
4 of the Employment Agreement- Compensation of Employee- is hereby modified to $165,000 annual base salary.


 


2.          The
terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this agreement as of the date first stated above.


 


	 	DRONE
    AVIATION HOLDING CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Jay Nussbaum
	 	 	Name:
    Jay H. Nussbaum
	 	 	Title:  
    Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Kendall Carpenter
	 	 	Name:
    Kendall W. Carpenter
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Competitive
Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) I,
William Gray, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 3, 2017





By: /s/ William Gray

William Gray, Principal Accounting Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
EX PARTE D.S.

1160408 (CR-15-1112)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4887 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, as 

the ‘‘Richard Allen Cable Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4887 EH

1 SECTION 1. RICHARD ALLEN CABLE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, 

4 Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Richard 

5 Allen Cable Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Richard Allen Cable 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4887 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Shelby, Indiana, as the ‘‘Richard Allen Cable al Service located at 23323 Shelby Road in
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Windy Mars: A dynamic planet as seen by the HiRISE camera      

      January 1, 2007    

With a dynamic atmosphere and a large supply of particulate material, the surface of Mars is heavily influenced by wind-driven, or aeolian, processes. The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) provides a new view of Martian geology, with the ability to see decimeter-size features. Current sand movement, and evidence for recent bedform development, is observed. Dunes and ripples generally exhibit complex surfaces down to the limits of resolution. Yardangs have diverse textures, with some being massive at HiRISE scale, others having horizontal and cross-cutting layers of variable character, and some exhibiting blocky and polygonal morphologies. "Reticulate" (fine polygonal texture) bedforms are ubiquitus in the thick mantle at the highest elevations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Laszlo Kestay, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

laz@usgs.gov

928-556-7002

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Laszlo Kestay, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

laz@usgs.gov

928-556-7002

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 98-30992 Summary Calendar

_____________________ ALBERT JEROME KING; ET AL, Plaintiffs, ALBERT JEROME KING, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1027

June 15, 1999 Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Albert Jerome King contests the summary judgment in favor of
Capital Transportation Corporation. In response to King’s claim

that Capital terminated his employment in violation of the

retaliation provision of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3, Capital
moved for summary judgment, asserting that King failed to comply- 2 -

with Title VII’s requirement that he file the action within 90 days following receipt of his right to sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The district court granted the motion, concludin g that King
had not presented adequate evidence to justify the application of
equitable tolling. King asserts that such tolling should have been
applied.

Of course, we review appeals from summary jud gment d e novo
.

Burns v. Harris County Bail Bond Board , 139 F.3d 513, 517 (5th Cir.

1998). Pursuant to our review of the record and the briefs, we

affirm for essentially t he reasons stated by the district court.

See King v. Capital Transp. Corp. , 97-1 027-A-1 (M.D.La. Aug. 3,

1998).

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Summer season variability of the north residual cap of Mars as observed by the Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer (MGS-TES)      

      January 1, 2008    

Previous observations have noted the change in albedo in a number of North Pole bright outliers and in the distribution of bright ice deposits between Mariner 9, Viking, and Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) data sets. Changes over the summer season as well as between regions at the same season (Ls) in different years have been observed. We used the bolometric albedo and brightness temperature channels of the Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) on the MGS spacecraft to monitor north polar residual ice cap variations between Mars years and within the summer season for three northern Martian summers between July 1999 and April 2003. Large-scale brightness variations are observed in four general areas: (1) the patchy outlying frost deposits from 90 to 270°E, 75 to 80°N; (2) the large “tail” below the Chasma Boreale and its associated plateau from 315 to 45°E, 80 to 85°N, that we call the “Boreale Tongue” and in Hyperboreae Undae; (3) the troughed terrain in the region from 0 to 120°E longitude (the lower right on a polar stereographic projection) we have called “Shackleton's Grooves” and (4) the unit mapped as residual ice in Olympia Planitia. We also note two areas which seem to persist as cool and bright throughout the summer and between Mars years. One is at the “source” of Chasma Boreale (∼15°E, 85°N) dubbed “McMurdo”, and the “Cool and Bright Anomaly (CABA)” noted by Kieffer and Titus 2001. TES Mapping of Mars’ north seasonal cap. Icarus 154, 162–180] at ∼330°E, 87°N called here “Vostok”. Overall defrosting occurs early in the summer as the temperatures rise and then after the peak temperatures are reached (Ls∼110) higher elevations and outlier bright deposits cold trap and re-accumulate new frost. Persistent bright areas are associated with either higher elevations or higher background albedos suggesting complex feedback mechanisms including cold-trapping of frost due to albedo and elevation effects, as well as influence of mesoscale atmospheric dynamics.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **