alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      13.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**




**8
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**




**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**




**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam
      Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anita
      Soni, Director - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Anita SoniName:
            Anita
                SoniTitle:
            Director
                - FinanceDate:
            October
                20, 2005





The
      foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the
      aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended
      to
      be used or relied upon for any other purposes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          100808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   233298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     662482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1040171
<PP&E>                                         1762641
<DEPRECIATION>                                   83032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3050845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1602205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        451
<COMMON>                                           468
<OTHER-SE>                                     4630929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3050845
<SALES>                                         194558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                194558
<CGS>                                           119219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   119219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                671281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (17498)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (613440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (613440)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12

                                       INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
                         COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                     (Dollar amounts in millions)
<TABLE>
                                                                 Years Ended December 31,
                                                    <c>        <c>        <c>         <c>        <c>
Fixed    charges:                                 2001       2000       1999        1998       1997
  Interest expense...........................   $254.3   $  286.6   $  204.5    $  225.9     $137.5
  Amortization of debt discount and expense..      8.8        6.1        6.7         7.0        2.0
  Rentals (one-third of rentals).............     36.3       28.2       23.9        23.8       23.3
  Capitalized interest.......................      4.0        4.4        4.0         4.0        3.2
  Equity-linked security charges............       8.3       25.6       25.6        19.7        0.0
Total fixed charges..........................   $311.7   $  350.9   $  264.7    $  280.4     $166.0

Net earnings from continuing operations         $246.2   $  546.2   $  563.1    $  481.6     $367.6
Add:   Minority income of majority-
         owned subsidiaries..................     20.1       39.3       29.1        23.5        3.6
       Taxes on income from continuing
         operations..........................     (2.9)     284.4      307.1       257.6      220.2
       Fixed charges.........................    311.7      350.9      264.7       280.4      166.0
Less:  Capitalized interest..................      4.0        4.4        4.0         4.0        3.2
       Undistributed earnings (losses) from
         less than 50% owned affiliates......      0.8        9.2       27.1        33.8       16.6
Earnings available for fixed charges ........   $570.3   $1,270.2   $1,132.9    $1,055.3     $737.6

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ..........     1.83       3.44       4.28        3.59       4.44
Undistributed earnings (losses) from less
    than 50% owned affiliates:
  Equity in earnings (losses)............       $  3.3   $   11.7   $   29.3    $   37.0     $ 18.7
    Less:  Amounts distributed...............      2.5        2.5        2.2         3.2     $  2.1
  Undistributed earnings (losses) from
    less-than 50% owned affiliates...........   $  0.8   $    9.2   $   27.1    $   33.8     $ 16.6


</TABLE>
In  connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the
period  ended  December  31,  2004  as  filed  with  the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities  and  on  the  dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operation of the
Company.



               /s/  Jon  R.  Latorella
               Jon  R.  Latorella
               President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
               May  17,  2005



               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer
               May  17,  2005
EXHIBIT  32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	The undersigned, Robert Hipple, Acting Chief Executive Officer, and
Chief Financial Officer of American Development & Investment Fund, Inc.
(the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 14th of November, 2008.

							   /s/ Robert Hipple
							By .........................
							  Robert Hipple,
                                          Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to American Development & Investment Fund, Inc. and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Carl GRIGGS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
John GISSENDANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 55 (Thursday, March 20, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-734]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0059; Airspace Docket No. 08-ANE-90]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Fort Kent, ME

Correction

    In rule document 08-734 beginning on page 9451 in the issue of 
Thursday, February 21, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 9452, in the first column, under ``Rule'' heading, in the 
seventh line, ``011'' should read ``001''.
[FR Doc. Z8-734 Filed 3-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 174 (Friday, September 6, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 47240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10906]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 174 / Friday, Septemebr 6, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 47240]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP92-237-028]


Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Motion to Amend 
Approved Settlement

Correction

    In notice document 96-21379 appearing on page 43349 in the issue of 
Thursday, August 22, 1996, the docket line should read as set forth in 
the heading.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Patent and Trademark Office

          - 37 CFR Part 1
          - [Docket No.: PTO-P-2008-0023]
          - RIN 0651-AC28

      ( print page 38027)    

### Correction

In proposed rule, document E8-13730 beginning on page 34672 in the issue of Wednesday, June 18, 2008, make the following correction:

1. On page 34674, in Table 1, in the second column, under the heading Fiscal year 2007 payments, in the first entry “$54,335” should read “54,335”.

§ 1.445

2. On page 34676, in §1.445(a)(3), in the first column “$,225.00” should read “$2,225.00”.

[FR Doc. Z8-13730 Filed 7-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Warren TARVER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 4D18-1872

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Ana S Cossio 21-12256 AJC 4/16/21 ✔ Photo ID/SS card - Legible/Unredacted Missing 2016(B) ✔ ✔ IVL Valuation motion not filed ✔ Cemetery ✔ Cemetery ✔ #8544/6518 (1/14/21-3/9/21) ✔ Affidavit of support LF 90 LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity Missing signed copy of the Attorney's Declaration

Case 21-12256-AJC Doc 16 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ISAIAH RANSOME,

Appellant

v.

JUDGE MARK MOORE, COMMON PLEAS 

COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 EAP 2024

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of June, 2024, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See 42 

Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (limiting this Court’s jurisdiction to “appeals from final orders of the 

Commonwealth Court entered in any matter which was originally commenced in the 

Commonwealth Court”); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1) (defining a final order as one that “disposes 

of all claims and of all parties”). Cf. Melvin v. Doe, 836 A.2d 42, 44 n.4 (Pa. 2003) (“[A]n 

order denying a motion for summary judgment does not terminate the litigation, and thus 

is not an appealable order.”).
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

Case No. 21-20622-PDR

Samuel Fitzgerald Worrell,

Chapter 13

Debtor.

/

Samuel Fitzgerald Worrell,

Plaintiff,

v. Adv. Case No. 21-01382-PDR

Ditech Financial Servicing, LLC,

Defendant.

/

ORDER DENYING NEWREZ’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

AND SUA SPONTE DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

This matter came before the Court for hearing on February 2, 2022, on NewRez 

LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) and the 

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 2, 2022.

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 21 Filed 02/02/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. 14). Following the hearing and upon 

review of the motions, court file, and record, for the reasons stated on the record at 

the hearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is DENIED.

2. The Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 14) is DENIED.

3. Upon the Court’s sua sponte review of the Complaint (Doc. 1), the Court 

further orders that the Plaintiff’s reference to “et al” in the case caption is 

STRICKEN.

4. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

because, based on the Plaintiff’s own statements at the hearing, the Complaint does 

not articulate the relief the Plaintiff seeks. The Plaintiff may file an amended 

complaint within thirty days of the entry of this order.

# # #

Copies To:

All parties in interest.

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 21 Filed 02/02/22 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

IGNACIO VALDIVIA-MARQUEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-50091

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00651-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Ignacio Valdivia-Marquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

possession with intent to distribute marijuana on board a vessel subject to United

States jurisdiction and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C.

FILED

NOV 23 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 960(b)(2)(G); and 46 U.S.C. § 70503(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Valdivia-Marquez contends that the district court procedurally erred by

focusing on general deterrence to the exclusion of the other 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

factors and failing to consider and explain its rejection of his mitigating arguments. 

We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103,

1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The record reflects that the court properly

considered the section 3553(a) factors and Valdivia-Marquez’s mitigating

arguments, and sufficiently explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520

F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 

Valdivia-Marquez next contends that the alleged procedural errors resulted

in a substantively unreasonable sentence. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing Valdivia-Marquez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States,

552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The below-Guidelines sentence is substantively

reasonable in light of the section 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the

circumstances. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587

F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a

particular case is for the discretion of the district court.”). 

All pending motions are denied. 

AFFIRMED.

2 14-50091
Peter W. FERREIRA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(91)
              - products_data(378)
              - products_maps(425)
              - products_publications(3675)
              - products_web_tools(6)
              - multimedia_audio(20)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(19)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(406)
              - multimedia_image-141769(9)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(354)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(17)
              - multimedia_image-204460(10)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(4)
              - multimedia_video(123)
              - multimedia_video-149194(48)
              - multimedia_video-149195(51)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(10)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(12)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - (-)news_news-149245(10)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(12)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(23)
              - connect_locations(4)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(85)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(20)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(9)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - utah(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

State News Release        May 17, 2023        New Online Maps for Exploring Groundwater Levels in Arizona

State News Release        August 21, 2014        USGS Measures Flooding in Arizona

State News Release        August 18, 2016        Water Levels Declining in Areas Along San Pedro River near Sierra Vista, Arizona

State News Release        September 29, 2023        Media Alert: Low-Level Airplane Flights to Image Geology Over Parts of Southeastern Arizona

State News Release        May 5, 2015        Assessing the State of San Pedro Water Resources

State News Release        September 18, 2014        USGS Continues to Measure Flooding in Arizona

State News Release        October 2, 2018        USGS Prepares to Measure Flooding Across Arizona

State News Release        September 28, 2020        Earth MRI Funds Critical Minerals Projects in Arizona

State News Release        March 6, 2018        Media Advisory:  Low-flying Helicopter to Survey Groundwater near Grand Canyon West and Peach Springs, Arizona

State News Release        April 19, 2021        Large Decreases in Upper Colorado River Salinity Since 1929
M. T. S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. H. A. W., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.