alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aquatic Life Criteria - Cadmium

Notice of Availability of Draft Aquatic Life Criteria for 

Cadmium

EPA is requesting public comment on a draft updated national recommended aquatic life criteria 

for the pollutant cadmium in both fresh and saltwater. The draft document is an update to EPA’s 

2001 aquatic life criteria for cadmium and reflects the latest scientific information available on the 

toxicity of cadmium to aquatic organisms. The document underwent independent expert external 

peer review in November 2015; the current draft document reflects changes made in response to the 

external peer review.

EPA is now accepting written scientific views from the public on the document for 60 days. After 

considering public feedback, EPA will revise the document as appropriate and publish the final 

criteria document in 2016. Once finalized, EPA’s water quality criteria for cadmium will provide 

recommendations to states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the 

Clean Water Act.

• Fact Sheet: Draft Aquatic Life Criteria for Cadmium (November 2015)

• Federal Register Notice: Request for Scientific Views on the Draft Recommended Aquatic 

Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium - 2015 | Print Version (PDF) (3 pp, 216 

K, About PDF) (December 1, 2015)

• Draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium – 2015

• External Peer Review Report for the Draft Cadmium Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality 

Criteria

• EPA Response to External Peer Review Report on the Draft Cadmium Aquatic Life Ambient 

Water Quality Criteria

On this page:

• What is cadmium? 

• How is cadmium used? 

• How does cadmium affect aquatic life? 

What is cadmium?

Cadmium is a relatively rare, naturally occurring metal found in mineral deposits and distributed 

ubiquitously at low concentrations in the environment.

How is cadmium used?

Aquatic Life Criteria - Cadmium | Water Quality Criteria | US EPA Page 1 of 2

http://www.epa.gov/wqc/aquatic-life-criteria-cadmium 3/3/2016
Cadmium’s primary industrial uses are for the manufacturing of batteries, pigments, plastic 

stabilizers, metal coatings, alloys and electronics. Recently, cadmium has been used in 

manufacturing nanoparticles (quantum dots) for use in solar cells and color displays.

How does cadmium affect aquatic life?

Cadmium is a non-essential metal with no biological function in aquatic animals. In addition to 

acute effects such as mortality, chronic exposure to cadmium can lead to adverse effects on growth, 

reproduction, immune and endocrine systems, development, and behavior in aquatic organisms.

Last updated on January 15, 2016

Aquatic Life Criteria - Cadmium | Water Quality Criteria | US EPA Page 2 of 2

http://www.epa.gov/wqc/aquatic-life-criteria-cadmium 3/3/2016
Michael MCCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5074

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

VEGA-ATLANTIC CORPORATION
                                                   435 Martin Street, Suite 2000
                                                                Blaine, WA 98230

                                                       Telephone: (360) 332-3823
                                                       Toll Free: (800) 721-0016
                                                       Facsimile: (360) 332-1643
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2002 of Vega-Atlantic Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Grant Atkins, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.


                                        /s/ Grant Atkins
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Grant Atkins, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer

                                        August 12, 2002
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI N O. 2016-CP-01422-COA ANTHONY EARL LOVERN A/K/A ANTHONY LOVERN APPELLANT

v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/29/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. W ILLIAM E. CHAPMAN III COURT FROM W HICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ANTHONY EARL LOVERN (PRO SE) ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: BILLY L. GORE NATURE OF THE CASE: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 09/05/2017 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: BEFORE LEE, C.J., FAIR AND WILSON, JJ. WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In Decem

ber 2009, Anthony Earl Lovern pled guilty to g ratif ication of lust (Count I) and statutory rape (Count II). In his plea petition and at his plea h earing, Lovern adm itted under oath that h e had rubbed his pen i s against the vaginal area o f a twelve-y ear-old child f or t he purpose of gratif

y ing his lust; t his occurred in 2006 when Lovern w as approxim ately twenty

- nine y ears of age. Lovern also a dm itted under o ath that he had s e xual intercourse with a n e l e v e n - y ear-old child (a d if f erent child); this occurred in 2005 when Lovern was

a p p r o x i mately twenty -eight y ears of age. The circuit c ourt accepted Lovern’s plea af t e r f inding t hat it was knowing, v o luntary , and supported b y a suf f icient f actual basis. The courtsentenced Lovern to f if teen y ears on Count I, with f ive y ears suspended, a nd ten y ears on Count I I , w i t h ten y e ars s uspended, said sentences to run concurrently , and f ive y ears of supervised probation. ¶2. On August 22, 2016, Lovern f iled a p etition f

or post-conviction relief in the c i r c u it court. He alleged that he is actually innocent of t he charges, t hat h is p lea was “ entered due to coercion and f

ear indu c e d b y h i s def

ense a ttorney , ” and that there was not a suf f icient f actual b asis f

or his plea. L overn’s petition is supported by only his own a llegations and is ref uted by his plea p etition and the transcript of his plea hearing. The circuit court c oncluded that Lovern’s petition was tim e-barred because it was f iled alm ost seven y ears af ter he pled guilty and did not f

a ll within any of the e xceptions to the s tatute of lim itations of the Unif orm P o s t

- C o n viction Collateral R elief Act. See M iss. C ode A nn. § 99-39-5(2) ( Rev. 2015) ( a

m otion f or post-conviction relief m ust be f iled within three y ears af t er the en t r y o f a judgm ent of

conviction based on a guilty plea). ¶3. T h e c i r c u i t court correctly ruled that Lovern’s claim s are tim e-barred and without

m erit. Theref

ore, we af f irm

. ¶4. AFFIRMED. L E E , C . J . , I R

V I N G AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BAR N E S , I S H E E , C A R L T O N , F A I R , GREENLEE AND WESTBROOKS, JJ., CONCUR.

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - (-)new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileLaura Shriver

Data Release        September 30, 2020        Microplastics data collected from streams in the northeastern United States, 2017-2018

publication        January 23, 2014        Assessment of the geoavailability of trace elements from selected zinc minerals

Photography        August 6, 2019        USGS Volunteers for Science collect groundwater samples

publication        March 27, 2017        Occurrence, temporal variation, and estrogenic burden of five parabens in sewage sludge collected across the United States

publication        May 5, 2016        Contamination with bacterial zoonotic pathogen genes in U.S. streams influenced by varying types of animal agriculture

publication        January 1, 2003        Motorized migrations: The future or mere fantasy?

publication        June 6, 2006        Major and trace elements in 35 lake and reservoir sediment cores from across the United States, 1994-2001

publication        May 27, 2013        Frequent cross-species transmission of parvoviruses among diverse carnivore hosts

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
EXHIBIT 99(B)



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE







I, John Weisickle, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President/Finance of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of October 1, 2001 among the Servicer, American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller, Citibank, N.A., as Owner Trustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2001-3 Owner Trust and Bankers Trust Company as Indenture Trustee as follows:



(i)

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve month period ended March 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;



(ii)

To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period; and



(iii)

To the best of my knowledge and information, no Event of Default nor any event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, would become an Event of Default under the Agreement, has occurred or is continuing.



This certificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section 3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective October 1, 2001, which terms and conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of June, 2004.





/s/ John Weisickle______

Name: John Weisickle

Title:   Vice President/Finance
STATE EX REL. Dale Henry NACHTIGAL v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0903

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant to remand to the district court for a specific ruling.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6156

WILLIAM R. HINTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-2146-DKC) Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.William R. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William R. Hinton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &Supp. 1998). We find that Hinton’s petition was barred by the oneyear statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West Supp. 1998). Hinton had until April 23, 1997, to file his federal habeas petition. See Brown v. Angelone , 150 F.3d 370, 375-76 (4th Cir. 1998). The limitations period was tolled on April 18, 1997, whenHinton’s state petition was properly filed. The state petition remained pending until June 5, 1998. Thus, Hinton had until June 11, 1998, to file his federal habeas petition. Hinton did not file the petition until June 30, 1998. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-15670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993 Cooperative Research Group on Development and 
Evaluation of a Gas Chromatograph Testing Protocol

Correction

    In notice document E8-15670 appearing on page 40882 in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 16, 2008, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 40882, in the first column, in the first paragraph, in 
the fourth line from the bottom, ``PP Pipelines'' should read ``BP 
Pipelines''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in 
the second line from the bottom, ``GMEH'' should read ``GMBH''.

[FR Doc. Z8-15670 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ACE-30]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Audubon, IA

Correction

    In rule document 98-1105 beginning on page 2598, in the issue of 
Friday, January 16, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1 [Corrected]

    On page 2599, in the third column, in Sec. 71.1, in the second 
line, under ACE IA E5 Audubon, IA [Revised], ``95 deg.55'14''W'' should 
read ``94 deg.55'14''W''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5036 

To clarify the application of spousal impoverishment protections for recipients 

of home and community-based services under Medicaid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2016 

Ms. MCCOLLUM (for herself, Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. ELLISON) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To clarify the application of spousal impoverishment protections for recipients of home and community-based services under Medicaid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Families 

5 with Disabilities Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5036 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING APPLICATION OF MED2 ICAID SPOUSAL IMPOVERISHMENT PROTEC3 TIONS TO RECIPIENTS OF HOME AND COM4 MUNITY-BASED SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2404 of the Patient Pro6 tection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–5 note) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘During’’ and inserting the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—During’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—During the period 

13 in which subsection (a) is in effect, nothing in subsection 

14 (a) or section 1924 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

15 1396r–5) shall be construed as prohibiting a State that, 

16 as of January 1, 2014, had a home and community-based 

17 waiver approved under section 1915(c) of such Act (42 

18 U.S.C. 1396n(c)) under which the State disregarded the 

19 income and assets of the individual’s spouse in deter20 mining the initial and ongoing financial eligibility of an 

21 individual for services provided under such home and com22 munity-based waiver in place of the spousal impoverish23 ment provisions applied under such section 1924, from 

24 continuing to disregard the individual’s spousal income 

25 and assets for purposes of making such determinations 

26 while such waiver remains in effect.’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5036 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on January 

3 1, 2014. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources of Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado and Utah      

      January 1, 1976    

View Document

View Plate 1

View Plate

View Plate

Dinosaur National Monument, partly in the Rocky Mountain System and partly in the Colorado Plateaus physiographic province, covers an area of 322 square miles (834 square kilometres) in northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah. The climate is generally cool and pleasant in May, early June, September, and October; winters are cold. Normal annual precipitation ranges from less than 8 to more than 16 inches (203 to 406 millimetres).

Geologic formations in the monument range in age from upper Precambrian to Holocene, but not all ages are represented. The monument is on the south limb of the east-trending regional fold representing the Uinta Mountains. Faults and subsidary folds on the south slope of the Uinta Mountains complicate the geology and hydrology of the area.

None of the surface streams in the monument are diverted for public supply, but the Green and Yampa Rivers are a recreational resource for boaters. The flow of the Green River is regulated by Flaming Gorge Reservoir; however, flood potentials are estimated for the Yampa River and three smaller streams. Facilities in the monument are not endangered by probable mean annual floods, but may sustain some damage to facilities by the 25- or 50-year floods.

Major aquifers in the monument are sandstone and limestone formations, but these formations are drained in the higher areas. Alluvium along the major stream channels yields small amounts of water to wells, but some of the water is not of suitable chemical quality for public supply. All public water supplies in 1971 were obtained from wells, and the use of water during 1970 was estimated to be 15 million gallons (46 acre-feet or 0.057 cubic hectometres). Most of the ground water obtained from sandstone and limestone is of suitable chemical quality for public supply.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Dinosaur National Monument
                  - Colorado
                  -  Utah

View All **
velatel_ex1001.htm








Exhibit 10.1


 



LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE


 




 



	
$1,052,631.50

	
Date: March 5, 2012












FOR VALUE RECEIVED, VelaTel Global Communications, Inc. (“Borrower”) promises to pay to the order of Weal Group, Inc. (“Lender”) the sum of up to One Million Fifty-Two Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-One and 50/100 U.S. Dollars (“Principal Amount”), together with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date hereof.







From each disbursement, Lender shall retain 5% of the amount requested (“Holdback”) as a set-up fee and compensation for Lender’s due diligence in connection with this Note.  Each Holdback shall, nonetheless, be added to the principal balance and shall accrue interest along with the amount actually disbursed and outstanding from time to time.  The principal sum of this Note includes a Holdback on total potential disbursements of up to $1,000,000.00, or so much thereof as may be disbursed by Lender to Borrower, and includes $265,144.35 previously disbursed by Lender to Borrower at various times.







The entire Principal Amount, together with all interest accrued and unpaid, shall be due and payable on the first anniversary from the date hereof (“Maturity Date”).  Borrower may prepay this Note in whole or in part prior to the Maturity Date without penalty.  Any partial payments shall be applied first to costs of collection incident to any event of default, then to interest accrued but unpaid, then to reduction of the Principal Amount.  All interest on this Note shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.







Should this Note be placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, Borrower promises to pay such reasonable attorney fees and other costs of collection as Lender may incur, whether or not suit is brought.  Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collecting, grace and notice of protest.







Borrower is maker on a Note with Isaac Organization, Inc. (“Isaac Note”).  The Isaac Note provides that Borrower and Isaac agree to add a conversion feature granting Isaac an option to convert all or a portion of the balance of principal and interest due under the Isaac Note to shares of Borrower’s Series A common stock (“Shares”).  The details of the conversion feature will be agreed to between the Parties when Borrower has additional authorized Shares available for issuance.  Upon such amendment or substitution of the Isaac Note, Borrower agrees to amend or substitute this Note with a Note containing identical conversion features to the amended or substituted Isaac Note.







VELATEL GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

















By /s/ George Alvarez            


     George Alvarez, its Chief Executive Officer
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Kenneth BENNETT, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-4619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.