alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 12, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 52203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-17138]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 12, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 52203]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2006-0796; FRL-8462-2]
RIN 2050-AE81


Notice of Data Availability on the Disposal of Coal Combustion 
Wastes in Landfills and Surface Impoundments

Correction

    In notice document E7-17138 beginning on page 49714 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 29, 2007, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 49718, in the first column, in the fourth full 
paragraph, in the seventh line, ``5 x 10<SUP>minus</SUP>\;4\<='' should 
read ``5 x 10<SUP>-4</SUP>''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in 
the eighth line, ``2 x <SUP>10minus</SUP>\;4\'' should read ``2 x 
10<SUP>-4</SUP>''.

[FR Doc. Z7-17138 Filed 9-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Uranus

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 11, 2004        Uranus's Ring

publication        January 1, 1986        Voyager 2 in the Uranian system: Imaging science results

publication        May 1, 2023        Constraints on the composition and thermal structure of Ariel’s icy crust as inferred from its largest observed impact crater

publication        December 2, 2022        Giant planet observations in NASA's Planetary Data System

publication        January 1, 1987        Hydromagnetic constraints on deep zonal flows in the giant planets

publication        January 1, 1987        Geological terrains and crater frequencies on Ariel

publication        January 1, 1999        Tectonics of Atlantic Canada

publication        January 1, 1980        Jupiter and the Voyager mission
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

IN RE:

CHANCE & ANTHEM, LLC, CASE NO. 18-16248-MAM

Chapter 7

Debtor.

___________________________________/

ROBERT C. FURR, not individually but as

Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of the Debtors,

Plaintiff,

v. ADV. NO. 22-01032-MAM

GEORGE MALER and JERI MALER,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

COMES NOW, GEORGE MALER and JERI MALER (the “Malers”), by and through 

undersigned counsel and file this Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, and 

state: 

1. On January 28, 2022, the Trustee filed the instant action against the Malers.

2. The Malers recently retained the undersigned.

3. The undersigned has contacted the attorney for the Trustee and requested additional 

time to respond to the complaint to allow the Malers to locate documents to be better 

able to respond to the complaint. 

4. The attorney for the Trustee has agreed to an extension of time. 

Case 22-01032-MAM Doc 6 Filed 02/24/22 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE the Malers respectfully requests that the Court grant them an additional 

twenty (20) days through and including March 22, 2022 to file an answer to the 

complaint. 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided electronically to Barry Gruher, 

Esquire, bgruher@gjb-law.com this 24th day of February, 2022.

BRIAN K. MCMAHON, P.A.

1401 Forum Way, 6th Floor

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Tel (561)478-2500

Fax (561)478-3111

briankmcmahon@gmail.com

_/s/ Brian K. McMahon____

Brian K. McMahon

FL Bar No. 853704

Case 22-01032-MAM Doc 6 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10116

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE JULIAN OROZCO-LOPEZ, also known as Jose Julian Orozco-Torres,

also known as Jose Julian Lopez-Torres,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-50-1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Julian Orozco-Lopez, federal prisoner # 41253-177, is serving a 324-

month term of imprisonment for conspiring to possess with the intent to 

distribute methamphetamine. He appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of sentence based on Amendment 

782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 4, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10116 Document: 00513258881 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2015
No. 15-10116

2

offense levels in the drug quantity table set forth in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c). 

Orozco-Lopez asks this court to appoint counsel in his case.

At his original sentencing, Orozco-Lopez was assigned a base offense 

level of 38 under § 2D1.1(c)(1) because his offense involved the equivalent of 

324,437.32 kilograms of marijuana. Under amended § 2D1.1(c), OrozcoLopez’s base offense level remains 38. § 2D1.1(c)(1). In determining the effect 

of an amendment for purposes of § 3582(c)(2), a defendant’s other applicable 

sentencing adjustments and criminal history remain unchanged. U.S.S.G. 

§ 1B1.10(b)(1). Thus, Amendment 782 did not lower Orozco-Lopez’s applicable 

guidelines range of 324-405 months of imprisonment, and § 3582(c)(2) does not 

authorize a reduction in his sentence. See § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B), p.s.

Orozco-Lopez complains that the district court should not have based its 

decision on his presentence report without giving him notice and an 

opportunity to challenge its reliability. He also complains that the district 

court denied his motion without considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors 

and gave him no opportunity to respond to its decision. He has not shown an 

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Hernandez, 645 F.3d 709, 711-12 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Nor has he shown that the district court abused its discretion by 

declining to appoint counsel. We will not consider Orozco-Lopez’s challenges 

to his conviction and original sentence, which are raised for the first time on 

appeal and are not cognizable in a § 3582(c)(2) motion. See United States v. 

Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1010-11 (5th Cir. 1995).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Orozco-Lopez’s motion 

for the appointment of appellate counsel is DENIED.

 Case: 15-10116 Document: 00513258881 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2015
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Infographics        March 19, 2024        PFAS Fate Transport Diagram

slideshow        December 22, 2022        Desert, aquatic, prairie, forest, riparian, tundra, and sagebrush plants

Infographics        October 1, 2023        #ClimateCryptids: Bigfoot

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - Spanish version

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - English Version

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery
EXHIBIT 99.1

                              BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Moon Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark M. Laisure, the President and Director of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/  MARK M. LAISURE
-------------------------------
Mark M.  Laisure
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 6, 2002
Exhibit
32





Certifications
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Angelo De Caro and Robert F. O’Connell, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Angelo De
      CaroAngelo
      De CaroChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Robert F.
      O'ConnellRobert F.
      O’ConnellChief
      Financial Officer





November
10, 2008







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of this
Report.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z9-3862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Allegheny National Forest, PA; Reserved and Outstanding Oil and 
Gas Design Criteria

Correction

    In notice document E9-3862 beginning on page 8899 in the issue of 
Friday, February 27, 2009, make the following correction:
    On page 8899, in the last line of the first column, ``March 26, 
2009'' should read ``March 30, 2009''.

[FR Doc. Z9-3862 Filed 3-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 48615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z9-22392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60653; File No. SR-NYSE-2009-89]


 Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change As Modified by Amendment No. 1 
To Amend Certain Corporate Governance Requirements

Correction

    In notice document E9-22392 beginning on page 47831 in the issue of 
Thursday, September 17, 2009, make the following correction:
    On page 47837, in the third column, in the 24th line from the top, 
``October 5, 2009'' should read ``October 8, 2009''.

[FR Doc. Z9-22392 Filed 9-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6409

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAVIER BROWN, a/k/a Juv,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:16-cr-00630-MGL-1; 3:21-cv-00568-MGL)

Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javier Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Winston David Holliday, Jr., Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6409 Doc: 6 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Javier Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made 

the requisite showing. See United States v. Davis, __ F.4th __, __, No. 20-4433, 2023 WL 

4876392, at *9-13 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2023). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6409 Doc: 6 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Order entered September 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00807-CV

IKE S. UGOKWE, Appellant

V.

SOCA FUNDING, LLC AND SOUTHWEST BANK, Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-08129

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 24, 2015 second motion for extension of time to file 

brief to the extent we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than 

October 2, 2015, the supplemental clerk’s record requested by appellant. We further ORDER 

appellant to file his brief no later than October 9, 2015. Appellant is cautioned that no further 

extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this letter to Ms. Pitre and counsel 

for the parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5233 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Local Budget Autonomy Amendment Act of 

2012, to amend the District of Columbia Home Rule 

Act to clarify the respective roles of the District government and Congress in the local budget process of the 

District government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5233 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clarifying Congres3 sional Intent in Providing for DC Home Rule Act of 

4 2016’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LOCAL BUDGET AUTONOMY AMEND6 MENT ACT OF 2012. 

7 Effective with respect to fiscal year 2013 and each 

8 succeeding fiscal year, the Local Budget Autonomy 

9 Amendment Act of 2012 (D.C. Law 19–321) is hereby 

10 repealed, and any provision of law amended or repealed 

11 by such Act shall be restored or revived as if such Act 

12 had not been enacted into law. 

13 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF ROLES OF DISTRICT GOVERN14 MENT AND CONGRESS IN LOCAL BUDGET 

15 PROCESS. 

16 (a) CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION OF FEDERAL

17 APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS TO GENERAL FUND.—Section 

18 450 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1– 

19 204.50, D.C. Official Code) is amended— 

20 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘The Gen21 eral Fund’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The 

22 General Fund’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub24 section: 

25 ‘‘(b) APPLICATION OF FEDERAL APPROPRIATIONS

26 PROCESS.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed as cre-
3 

•HR 5233 EH

1 ating a continuing appropriation of the General Fund de2 scribed in subsection (a). All funds provided for the Dis3 trict of Columbia shall be appropriated on an annual fiscal 

4 year basis through the Federal appropriations process. 

5 For each fiscal year, the District shall be subject to all 

6 applicable requirements of subchapter III of chapter 13 

7 and subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, United States 

8 Code (commonly known as the ‘Anti-Deficiency Act’), the 

9 Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, and all other require10 ments and restrictions applicable to appropriations for 

11 such fiscal year.’’. 

12 (b) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY

13 OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO CHANGE EXISTING BUDG14 ET PROCESS LAWS.—Section 603(a) of such Act (sec. 1– 

15 206.03(a), D.C. Official Code) is amended— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘existing’’; and 

17 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert18 ing the following: ‘‘, or as authorizing the District 

19 of Columbia to make any such change.’’. 
4 

•HR 5233 EH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact3 ment of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5233 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Local Budget Autonomy Amendment 

and for other purposes. local budget process of the District government, the District government and Congress in the Home Rule Act to clarify the respective roles of Act of 2012, to amend the District of Columbia
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

64539

Vol. 63, No. 224

Friday, November 20, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 981104276–8276–01; I.D.

100898A]

Fisheries of the Northeastern United

States; Proposed 1999 Fishing Quotas

for Atlantic Surf Clams and Ocean

Quahogs

Correction

In proposed rule document 98–30288,

beginning on page 63434, in the issue of

Friday, November 13, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 63434, in the second column,

in the DATES: section, on the second

line, ‘‘December 17, 1998’’ should read

‘‘December 7, 1998’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4369-N-11]

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection for Public Comment

Consolidated Planning

Correction

In notice document 98–30482,

beginning on page 63741, in the issue of

Monday, November 16, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 63741, in the third column,

under the heading DATES:, ‘‘1998’’

should read ‘‘1999’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

COOPERATION AGENCY

U.S. Agency for International

Development

48 CFR Part 742

[AIDAR Notice 98-2]

Miscellaneous Amendments to

Acquisition Regulations

Correction

In proposed rule document 98–28804

beginning on page 59501 in the issue of

November 4, 1998, make the following

corrections:

1. On page 59501, in the third

column, in the fifth line from the bottom

‘‘reduce’’ should read ‘‘induce’’.

2. On the same page in the same

column, in the last line, ‘‘provision’’

should be added after ‘‘withholding’’.

3. On page 59502, in the first column,

in the second full paragraph, in the 20th

line ‘‘gown’’ should read ‘‘grown’’.

742.1170-1 [Corrected]

742.1170-1 General.

4. On page 59503, in the second

column, the section heading should

read as set forth above.

742.1170-3 [Corrected]

5. On page 59504, in the first column,

in 742.1170-3(c), in the fifth line from

the bottom ‘‘the claims’’ should read

‘‘the scope or terms of the contract or

may result in claims’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0557 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. QUINCY DEAN PFISTER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 11 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 1 2024

02/01/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0557
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z9-7496]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Information 
Collection; Comment Request

Correction

    In notice document E9-7496 beginning on page 15322 in the issue of 
Friday, April 3, 2009, make the following correction:
    On page 15322, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
second line, ``May 4, 2009'' should read ``June 2, 2009''.

[FR Doc. Z9-7496 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D