alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
· , .. ')' nT• ;rt·J··r (\C \ ...... ,.L\L., 1 ), 1 ,.,t I ·ilrc' 1il'l .......-11 

, r.{/\NS!)OFHAT!DN \~']l~!\ET OPERATIONS RECEIVED . JUN - 6 ·2012 

ZfiiZ JLH; l l p 1: L} \ HEARING DOCKET 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Diamond Air Charter, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CPIOEA0004 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0620 

Judge Sullivan 

MOTION FOR POSTPONEMENT OF FIFTH LITIGATION SCHEDULING 

CONFERENCE 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, and hereby moves for a 

continuance of the Fifth Litigating Scheduling Conference, which is scheduled for 

June 7, 2012. 

The basis for this Motion is that counsel for the Agency, the undersigned, will be 

taking depositions on June 7, 2012 in connection with a potential emergency 

enforcement case. Due to a variety of timing restraints and scheduling conflicts, 

Agency counsel had no choice but to schedule the depositions for that date. Agency 

counsel will be available for a litigating schedule conference on the following dates in 

June 2012: June 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, or 27. Counsel for Respondent has 

indicated that he has no objection to postponing the litigation scheduling conference 

- ·- ... 
but has not responded to an email from Agency counsel inquiring as to which dates in 

June would be available for him. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: ~~ ~(3r((1.. Zachary M. e an 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

718 553-3258 

718 995-5699 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Motion for Postponement of Fifth 

Litigation Scheduling Conference has been sent via first class mail and e-mail to the 

following: 

Gregory S. Winton 

Aviation Law Experts , LLC 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

Email: Greg@AviationLawExperts.Com 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Email: Diane.Mays@DOT.GOV 

I hereby certify that the .foregoing Agency's Motion for Postponement of Fifth 

Litigation Scheduling Conference has been sent via first class mail to the following: 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Room924A 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Date:. _---~,.1'-Y-IIP!-N --=----i1~----tt20ttt12"-- ~·~~ t/~ks Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

3
CGFD15 (4/23/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 24, 2021

A. Jay Cristol

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−17608−AJC

Chapter: 7

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Alexis Cruzata

aka Alex Cruzata

2490 West 4 Court, Apt 10

Hialeah, FL 33010

SSN: xxx−xx−2303

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

 At the time of filing of the above referenced case on August 2, 2021, the debtor was provided notice

by the court of filing requirements and the deadline(s) to correct deficiencies.

As of the date of this order, the debtor has failed to correct the following deficiency(ies) by the required

08/16/2021 deadline:

Debtor's Certification of Credit Counseling

 Because the debtor has failed to meet the deadline(s) above for the listed deficient items, it is

ORDERED that:

1. In accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), this case is dismissed.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

3. (If applicable) the trustee shall file a final report within 14 days of entry of this order.

4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United States

Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the balance of the

filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Payment must be made in cash, money order or

cashier's or "official" check. Any funds remaining with the trustee shall be applied to this balance in

accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by the

Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 14 Filed 08/24/21 Page 1 of 2
court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all unpaid fees are

paid at the time the motion is filed.

5. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept for filing

any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior order of the court

or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments and filing fees

remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

# # #

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

Case 21-17608-AJC Doc 14 Filed 08/24/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Uranium redox and deposition transitions embedded in deep-time geochemical models and mineral chemistry networks      

      February 9, 2024    

Uranium (U) is an important global energy resource and a redox sensitive trace element that reflects changing environmental conditions and geochemical cycling. The redox evolution of U mineral chemistry can be interrogated to understand the formation and distribution of U deposits and the redox processes involved in U geochemistry throughout Earth history. In this study, geochemical modeling using thermodynamic data, and mineral chemistry network analysis are used to investigate U geochemistry and deposition through time. The number of U6+ mineral localities surpasses the number of U4+ mineral localities in the Paleoproterozoic. Moreover, the number of sedimentary U6+ mineral localities increases earlier in the Phanerozoic than the number of U4+ sedimentary mineral localities, likely due to the necessity of sufficient sedimentary organic matter to reduce U6+–U4+. Indeed, modeling calculations indicate that increased oxidative weathering due to surface oxygenation limited U4+ uraninite (UO2) formation from weathered granite and basalt. Louvain network community detection shows that U6+ forms minerals with many more shared elements and redox states than U4+. The range of weighted Mineral Element Electronegativity Coefficient of Variation (wMEECV) values of U6+ minerals increases through time, particularly during the Phanerozoic. Conversely, the range of wMEECV values of U4+ minerals is consistent through time due to the relative abundance of uraninite, coffinite, and brannerite. The late oxidation and formation of U6+ minerals compared to S6+ minerals illustrates the importance of the development of land plants, organic matter deposition, and redox-controlled U deposition from ground water in continental sediments during this time-period.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Elisha “Eli”  K. Moore, Ph.D.

##### Research Chemist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

ekmoore@usgs.gov

703-648-6465

## Related Content

#### Elisha “Eli”  K. Moore, Ph.D.

##### Research Chemist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

ekmoore@usgs.gov

703-648-6465

### Contact

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Energy
                  - Minerals

View All **
Order entered January 27 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00567

- CV DARLENE C. AMRHEIN, Appellant

V.
ATTORNEY LENNIE F. B OLLINGER, AND WORMIN TON & BOLLINGE R LAW FIRM, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 02654

- 2017



### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Molberg, and Partida

- Kipness
We DENY Appellant’s motion for findings of fact and conclusions of law

.

/
s / /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Max CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

HLFIP HOLDING, INC., DBA SMART 

COMMUNICATIONS IP HOLDINGS,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

YORK COUNTY, PA, YORK COUNTY PRISON, 

ADAM OGLE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS 

YORK COUNTY PRISON WARDEN,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2022-1940

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 1:20-cv-00186-JPW, 

Judge Jennifer P. Wilson.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SCOTT THOMAS WEINGAERTNER, Goodwin Procter LLP, 

New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KATRINA M. QUICKER, Quicker Law, LLC, Atlanta, GA. 

 WILLIAM MILLIKEN, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, 

PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. 

Case: 22-1940 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 08/18/2023
Also represented by RICHARD CRUDO, UMA EVERETT, RYAN 

CHARLES RICHARDSON, MICHAEL D. SPECHT. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

August 18, 2023 

Date

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1940 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 08/18/2023
Exhibit





Exhibit 10(d)





Amendment to Wells Fargo & Company Supplemental 401(k) Plan (“Supplemental 401(k)”)


The first sentence of Section 24 of the Supplemental 401(k) Plan is amended effective July 1, 2017 to read in full as follows: 


For purposes of Section 3(16)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, the Plan Administrator shall be the Director of Human Resources, the Director of Compensation and Benefits, and the Head of Enterprise HR Solutions of the Company, each of whom, acting individually, may take action as the Plan Administrator.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

898 

CA 10-02480 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

PATRICIA IKEDA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

DANIELLE M. TEDESCO AND JAMES R. TEDESCO, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

 

RALPH W. FUSCO, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. 

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, SYRACUSE (LISA M. ROBINSON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

 

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court,

Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered March 9, 2010 in a

personal injury action. The order granted in part the motion of

defendants for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Simulating the water budget of a Prairie Potholes complex from LiDAR and hydrological models in North Dakota, USA      

      January 1, 2013    

Hydrological processes of the wetland complex in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) are difficult to model, partly due to a lack of wetland morphology data. We used Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) data sets to derive wetland features; we then modelled rainfall, snowfall, snowmelt, runoff, evaporation, the “fill-and-spill” mechanism, shallow groundwater loss, and the effect of wet and dry conditions. For large wetlands with a volume greater than thousands of cubic metres (e.g. about 3000 m3), the modelled water volume agreed fairly well with observations; however, it did not succeed for small wetlands (e.g. volume less than 450 m3). Despite the failure for small wetlands, the modelled water area of the wetland complex coincided well with interpretation of aerial photographs, showing a linear regression with R2 of around 0.80 and a mean average error of around 0.55 km2. The next step is to improve the water budget modelling for small wetlands.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Dakota

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Scientific meeting raises awareness of amphibian decline in Asia      

      January 1, 2000    

Blood samples from 433 Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) during fall and spring migrations, 1976-80, indicated that most of their pesticide burden, primarily DDE, was accumulated on wintering grounds in Latin America. DDE in spring migrants returning from Latin America for the first time declined significantly from 1979 to 1980. Only about 10% of breeding-age females contained organochlorine residues likely to adversely affect reproduction. The organochlorine pesticide threat in Latin America may be diminishing.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475
William Allen WHITLOW, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
In re: 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www. ffsb. uscourts.gov 

Case No. 

Chapter /J 

6Awe/ln ,I/!~ Debtor/ 

APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUALS TO PAY THE FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS 

1. Which chapter of the Bankruptcy Code are you choosing to file under: 

e1t1t1or1 Filing Fee 

• Chapter 7: $338 

D Chapter 11: $1,738 

D Chapter ·12: $278 

afchapter 13: $313 

l!:!jtial Installment Payment 

$169.00 

$869.00 

~ 

$139.00 

Final Installment Paymeni 

$169.00 

$869.00 

$139.00 

$156.50 

2. I am unable to pay the full filing fee with the petition and apply to pay in installments in 

accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 1006, Local Rule 1006-1 and the current mandatory payment 

schedule established by this court. · 

3. I understand that, in order for this application to be approved absent further order of the court, I 

must have paid half of the fding feE}/due at the time of filing my petition an.d I must pay the 

remaining half which equals $ lti/2, oO on or before 60 days from the filing date of my 

petition. 

4. l understand that .payment must be in cash or cashier's check unless submitted electronically by 

an attorney. 

5. I understand that if I fail to pay the fee when due, my bankruptcy case may be dismissed and I 

may not receive a discharge of my debts. If I am a chapter 13 debtor, I understand that upon 

confirmation of my plan, the unpaid balance of the filing fee must be paid in full. If I am a 

chapter 7 debtor, I understand my discharge will not be entered until my filing fee is paid in full. 

6. I understand that I must pay the entire filing fee before making any more payments or transfer 

any more property to an attorney, bankruptcy petition preparer, or anyone else for services in 

connection with this bankruptcy case. 

N)i8 Signature of ttomey 

' 0::: 'Z., "Z:::-'<-..) 

Date 

:;-jf't#t ~ \ ()- <Z_ <-,:'~ I 

ASignature of Debtor Date 

Name of Attorney 

LF-3 (rev. 12101/20) 

(In a joint case, both spouses must sign.) 

Wlfiti U 1CY 7 r<-r 

Signature of Joint Debtor (if any) Date 

Case 21-20206-PDR Doc 5 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 1
Robert James SPEARS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3853

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT
      32





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patriot
      National Bancorp, Inc. (the
      “ *Company* ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ *Report* ”),
      we,
      Angelo De Caro and Robert F. O’Connell, the Chief Executive
      Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Angelo De CaroAngelo
                De CaroChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Robert F. O’ConnellRobert
                F. O’ConnellChief
                Financial Officer





August
      10, 2005










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of this
      Report.
Tracey L. MARMA, Appellant, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, U.S. Bank Trust, N.a., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust, the Crossings Master Community Association, Inc. and James Guldi, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-1413

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171096) and Amendment No. 415 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 7, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 4, 2017
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 1 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 2 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 3 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 4 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 5 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 6 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 7 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 8 of 9
Case 21-12317-EPK Doc 28 Filed 03/31/21 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     852,066
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              237,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                342,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,541,166
<PP&E>                                     286,631
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,964,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,816,302
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,188)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,964,282
<SALES>                                    784,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           784,175
<CGS>                                      498,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            4,430,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          69,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (4,120,368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (4,120,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (4,120,368)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (1.530)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.530)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

          - 21 CFR Parts 1300, 1304, 1306, and 1311
          - [Docket No. DEA-218P]
          - RIN 1117-AA61

      ( print page 40451)    

### Correction

In proposed rule  document E8-14405 beginning on page 36722 in the issue of Friday, June 27, 2008, make the following correction:

On page 36766, in Table 18, in the third column, in the first entry, “$167,70” should read “$167,270”.

[FR Doc. Z8-14405 Filed 7-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1980        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

Science Snippet        June 3, 2016        EarthView–Eye of the Sahara