alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Currency L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Christian AngstadtName:
Christian AngstadtTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofDemeter Management LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
November 12, 2010
From Goldberg Seth SGoldbergsteptoe corn

Sent Thursday April 30 2009 628 PM GMT

To Boucher Michael rnboucherrnckennalong corn

Subject RE April 28 2009 letter frorn Seth Goldberg to Dennis Edwards and Philip Ross

No As am sure you recognize Buckman has no right to see Nalco CBI

which has been redacted from the public disclosure version we sent you

as courtesy at the request of Mr Ross

Seth Goldberg

Steptoe Johnson LLP

1330 Connecticut Ave N.W

Washington D.C 20036

Voice 202 429 6213

Fax 202 261 0566

sgoldberg@steptoe.com

Original Message

From Boucher Michael mboucher@mckennalong.com

Sent Thursday April 30 2009 1145 AM

To Wersinger Kate Goldberg Seth

Cc Edwards.Dennisepamail.epa.gov Hardy.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

philip.ross@epa.gov Boucher Michael

Subject April 28 2009 letter from Seth Goldberg to Dennis Edwards and

Philip Ross

Dear Mr Goldberg

Please advise me whether may expect to receive copy of your

original unredacted submission to EPA Thank you

Very truly yours

Michael Boucher

Counsel to Buckman Laboratories Inc

Michael Boucher Partner

McKenna Long Aldridge LLP

1900 Street NW Washington DC 20006

Tel 202.496.7729 Fax 202.496.7756 mboucher@mckennalong.com

Original Message

From Wersinger Kate kwersinger@steptoe.com

Sent Wednesday April 29 2009 422 PM

To Boucher Michael

Cc Edwards.Dennisepamail.epa.gov Hardy.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

philip.ross@epa.gov

Subject
Nalco.pdf Mr Boucher At the request of Mr Ross attached is

public disclosure copy of document submitted yesterday in further

support of Nalcos petition to cancel Buckmans ammonia products

Please let me know if you have any questions

Best regards

Kate Wersinger

Legal Executive Assistant

to Elizabeth Brown

and Seth Goldberg

Steptoe Johnson LLP

1330 Connecticut Avenue NW

Washington DC 20036-1795

202 429-6214

The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link

attachments

Nalco.pdf

Note To protect against computer viruses e-mail programs may prevent

sending or receiving certain types of file attachments Check your

e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This e-mail and any attachments contain information from

the law firm of McKenna Long Aldridge LLP and are

intended solely for the use of the named recipient or

recipients This e-mail may contain privileged

attorney/client communications or work product Any

dissemination of this e-mail by anyone other than an

intended recipient is strictly prohibited If you are not

named recipient you are prohibited from any further

viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any

use of the e-mail or attachments If you believe you have

received this e-mail in error notify the sender

immediately and permanently delete the e-mail any

attachments and all copies thereof from any drives or

storage media and destroy any printouts of the e-mail or

attachments
Joseph J. DUFF and Susan Duff, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Pamela Ann ATKINSON, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3786

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Corrections]
[Page 67215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z4-3078]



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2004 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 67215]]



DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Proposed Information Collection Request Submitted for Public 
Comment and Recommendations; Program Year (PY) 2005 Workforce 
Information Core Products and Services Grants Planning Guidance

Correction

    In notice document E4-3078 beginning on page 64977 in the issue of 
Tuesday, November 9, 2004, make the following correction:
    On page 64978, in the first column, under the heading ``dates'', in 
the second line, ``January 10, 2004'' should read ``January 10, 2005''.

[FR Doc. Z4-3078 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Opinion issued July 2 2 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 20

- 00862

- CV

——————————— ELLIOTT AINTABI , Appella nt

V. STEVEN WU, WESTWOOD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT , LLC, SSS VILLAGE AT WEST OAKS , LLC, AI HOA INVESTMENTS, INC., AI HOA WU, SUSAN WU , Appell e e s

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2019

- 52759

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant and appellees have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. No
opinion has issued.2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.1; 43.2(f). Any other pending motions are dismissing as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Hightowe r, and Rivas

- Molloy.
Norman E. CAISON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0229

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           U.S. Geological Survey—Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center 2021–23 research activity report      

      May 15, 2024    

View Report

XML Format

The mission of Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center is to provide scientific information needed to conserve and manage the Nation’s natural capital for current and future generations, with an emphasis on migratory birds, Department of the Interior trust resources, and ecosystems of the Nation’s interior. This report provides an overview of the studies conducted at Northern Prairie during fiscal years 2021–23 in pursuit of this mission. Studies are organized under a framework developed by the U.S. Geological Survey Ecosystems Mission Area, identifying primary and secondary alignment with focal areas of research, and summarizing recent scientific products resulting from these studies. Partnerships with Federal, State, and non-Governmental organizations are essential to a robust program of applied ecological research, and we thank our many collaborators and colleagues whose contributions made this work possible.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Sherfy

##### Deputy Center Director

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

msherfy@usgs.gov

701-253-5504

## Related Content

#### Mark Sherfy

##### Deputy Center Director

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

msherfy@usgs.gov

701-253-5504

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Tests for senescent decline in annual survival probabilities of common pochards, Aythya ferina      

      June 1, 1997    

Senescent decline in survival probabilities of animals is a  topic about which much has been written but little is known.  Here, we present formal tests of senescence hypotheses, using 1373 recaptures from 8877 duckling (age 0) and 504 yearling Common Pochards (Aythya ferina) banded at a Latvian study site, 1975-1992.  The tests are based on capture-recapture models that explicitly incorporate sampling probabilities that, themselves, may exhibit timeand age-specific variation.  The tests provided no evidence of senescent decline in survival probabilities for this species.  Power of the most useful test was low for gradual declines in annual survival probability with age, but good for steeper declines.  We recommend use of this type of capture-recapture modeling and analysis for other investigations of senescence in animal survival rates.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### James Nichols, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus 

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jnichols@usgs.gov

301-497-5660

#### James Hines

##### Computer Scientist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jhines@usgs.gov

301-497-5661

## Related Content

#### James Nichols, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus 

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jnichols@usgs.gov

301-497-5660

#### James Hines

##### Computer Scientist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jhines@usgs.gov

301-497-5661

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10789

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE RUEPERTO ALANIZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:99-CR-5-2

Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Rueperto Alaniz appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his

supervised release. The release followed his guilty plea conviction for conspiring

to possess with intent to distribute and for distributing cocaine. Alaniz argues

that the district court imposed a longer sentence of imprisonment than that

recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines’ policy statements

applicable to violations of supervised release (which he says was within the

range of four to ten months). He asserts that this was plain error.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 29, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10789

2

The district court may impose any sentence that falls within the maximum

term of imprisonment allowed by statute for the revocation sentence. 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e)(3). In doing so, the district court is to consider the factors set forth in

§ 3553(a) and the advisory policy statements found in Chapter Seven of the

Guidelines. United States v. Mathena, 23 F.3d 87, 90 (5th Cir. 1994). The

statutory maximum term of imprisonment upon the revocation of Alaniz’s

supervised release was five years. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Consequently, it

was not error to sentence Alaniz to two years in prison. See id.

Alaniz’s argument that the district court did not adequately articulate its

sentencing reasons also fails. On plain-error review of a revocation sentence, it

suffices to show that the sentencing factors were at least implicitly considered.

United States v. Teran, 98 F.3d 831, 836 (5th Cir. 1996). By announcing the

reasons it gave for Alaniz’s revocation sentence, the district court demonstrated

that it had implicitly considered the appropriate sentencing factors. See id.

AFFIRMED.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 223 (Thursday, November 19, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 64407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-101119]



                        Presidential Documents 



[[Page 64407]]
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20512]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 26250]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service

7 CFR Parts 271, 278 and 279

RIN 0584-AC46


Food Stamp Program: Retailer Integrity, Fraud Reduction and 
Penalties

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-12038, beginning on page 24985, in the 
issue of Wednesday, May 6, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 24995, in the second column, in the signature date line, 
``1990'' should read ``1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 152 (Monday, August 10, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39910-39914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z9-17190]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminsitration

50 CFR Part 229

[Docket No. 080721862-8864-01]
RIN 0648-AW51


Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing 
Operations; Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan Regulations

Correction

    In proposed rule document E9-17190 beginning on page 36058 in the 
issue of Tuesday, July 21, 2009, make the following correction:
    On page 36064, in the third column, before the heading Scientific 
Research, Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3 were inadvertently deleted. 
The three figures are printed to read as set forth below:

[[Page 39911]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP04AU09.116


[[Page 39912]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP04AU09.117


[[Page 39913]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP04AU09.118

[FR Doc. Z9-17190 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - (-)idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Project        November 5, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Monitoring Study
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

t0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145131

HERSCHEL COHEN, RONALD HARLAN

WOODY, III, CAROLE RYAN, DUANE

RAYMOND, and SUSAN RAYMOND,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

and

SHARON DAY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

ALAN LEVENSON, PETER JANSSEN,

ANETTE JANSSEN, HELEN BARBARA

SORENSEN, NELSON ROBERT PARDA,

PAMELA J. MADDERN, JACK C.

BLEVINS, JR., RICHARD ENGLISH, TOM

UNGAR, DOUGLAS ULRICH, RHONDA

ULRICH, MATTIE KING, EDWIN HUANG,

BRIAN FALK, SHELDON SHERMAN,

WOLFGANG ROSENFELDER, GREG

LEROY, MELISSA LEROY, ANTHONY

CASTELLANO, and JOANNE CASTELLANO,

Plaintiffs,

v SC: 145131

COA: 302746

Oakland CC: 2010

- 11128 2

- CZ

PARK WEST GALLERIES, INC., ALBERT

SCAGLIONE, MORRIS SHAPIRO, and

ALBERT MOLINA, and PLYMOUTH

AUCTIONEERING SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered March 22 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 00525

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant

V.

JORDAN FOSTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. 76,266



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal

.

On January 8, 2013, the Court ordered the trial court to sign an order stating its findings

of fact and abated this appeal . On March 7, 2013, the trial court’s findings of fact were fil ed by

the Clerk of the Court. The appeal will now proceed.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS

PRESIDING JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 221

Tanner L. Narloch, Plaintiff

v.

Neenah N. Narloch, Defendant and Appellant

 and

State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20210153

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Elise A. Fischer (argued) and Theresa Kellington (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for

defendant and appellant.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Narloch v. Narloch

No. 20210153

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Neenah Narloch appeals from a second amended divorce judgment. She 

argues the evidence does not support the district court’s decision denying her 

motion to relocate to Wyoming with the parties’ minor children. We summarily 

affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte
Level MARC, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-589

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-6263]



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2006 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 26407]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Inventory Completion: American Museum of Natural 
History, New York, NY

Correction

    In notice document E6-6263 appearing on page 24757 in the issue of 
Wednesday, April 26, 2006, make the following correction:
    In the center column, in the fourth full paragraph, in the fourth 
and fifth lines, ``245120 years B.P.'' should read ``245 <plus-minus> 
120 years B.P.''.

[FR Doc. Z6-6263 Filed 5-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001089504
<NAME>                        AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USA

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                               3,414
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                               4,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (999)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      85,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                83
<OTHER-SE>                                          17,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        85,884
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    24,862
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        28
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,861
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .69


</TABLE>