alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5160 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5160

   To amend title 40, United States Code, to include as part of the 
buildings and grounds of the National Gallery of Art any buildings and 
other areas within the boundaries of any real estate or other property 
           interests acquired by the National Gallery of Art.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2016

   Mrs. Miller of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 40, United States Code, to include as part of the 
buildings and grounds of the National Gallery of Art any buildings and 
other areas within the boundaries of any real estate or other property 
           interests acquired by the National Gallery of Art.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER AREAS WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF 
              REAL ESTATE OR OTHER PROPERTY INTERESTS ACQUIRED BY 
              NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART.

    Section 6301(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``The National Gallery of Art'' and inserting ``(A) The 
        National Gallery of Art'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) All other buildings, service roads, walks, 
                and other areas within the exterior boundaries of any 
                real estate or land or interest in land (including 
                temporary use) that the National Gallery of Art 
                acquires and that the Director of the National Gallery 
                of Art determines to be necessary for the adequate 
                protection of individuals or property in the National 
                Gallery of Art and suitable for administration as a 
                part of the National Gallery of Art.''.
                                 <all>
```
Parley Jay PASKETT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0910

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International
Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Adam Wasserman, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Adam Wasserman
------------------
Adam Wasserman
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
November 24, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION**

          In connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Glenn Barrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the   requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report   fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods   indicated. |

          This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| Date:  May 10, 2005 |   | /s/ GLENN BARRETT                           |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                             |
|                     | Name:  | Glenn   Barrett                             |
|                     | Title: | Chief   Financial Officer and               |
|                     |   | Senior   Vice-President, Corporate Services |
# APR 05  0744AM

CDR420

Line-In Record

Other

868.74506
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 62121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-31120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration
[Docket No. RSPA-97-2968 (PDA-17(R))]


Application by William E. Comley, Inc. and TWC Transportation 
Corporation for a Preemption Determination as to Public Utilities 
Commission of Ohio Requirements for Cargo Tanks

Correction

    In notice document 97-26918 beginning on page 53049, in the issue 
of Friday, October 10, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 53049, in the third column, in the DATES section, in the 
fourth line, ``December 9, 1997'' should read ``January 8, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
INSTRUCTIONS:EPA is seekinginformation regardingthe costs of estimatingPFC emissions under a possible approach that EPA is exploringTo estimate the costs of this methodology, please include the costs of estimating♦Gas/Facility- specific heel factors.♦PFC-usage byprocess type, usingengineeringmethods(e.gwafer pass or other indicator of tool activity)♦PFC utilization and by-product formation factors by process type. Process types may include the example provided in the "Process Types" tab or a revised version. Assume facility isresponsible for developing the utilization and by-product formation factors.♦PFC DRE byabatement device.Please note whereyou are alreadyperformingthe measurements or estimates in the ordinarycourse of businessPlease provide detail where possible regardinghow engineeringestimates are calculatedTable 1. Annual Costs for Estimating Annual Facility-Level PFC EmissionsFacility-Specific BurdenLabor Burden For Collecting DataInstrumentation Burden For Monitoring DataComments (e.g., is measurement already performed in ordinary courseof business?)Legal (hours)Manager(hours)Technical(hours)Clerical(hours)Capital Costs ($)EquipmentLifetime (years)Annual O&M Costs($)Other AnnualCosts (pleasespecify)Gas-specific heel factors500PFC usage by process tool395PFC utilization and by-product formationfactors by specific process type640$300K7$25KPFC DRE by abatement device1896$300k+$20k7$30K* Please clearly note any costs associated with activities that are part of business as usual operations at the fab.
#### Personal Pool of Manhattan, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Ralp Dinanno, Defendant.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County,

October 31, 1973.

*Julius Wolf son*for plaintiff. *Liggio V. Pitaro*and *Nicholas L. Pitaro*for defendant.

Burton S. Sherman, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment urging that the defendant’s answer did not comply with the requirements of CPLR 3016 (subd. [f]) in an action involving a claim for the performing of labor or services.

The rule states in pertinent part:- “In an action involving * * * the performing of labor or services * ** **the plaintiff may set forth and number in his verified complaint the items of his claim and the reasonable value or agreed price of each. Thereupon the defendant by his verified answer shall indicate specifically those items he disputes and whether in respect of delivery or performance, reasonable value or agreed price.”

The purpose of CPLR 3016 (subd. [f]) is, of course, to confine the issues for trial. However, to achieve this there must be strict compliance with the rule. This is especially true because of the increased use of computerized billing. Thus the items must be specifically numbered. *(Aluminum Bldg. Prods. Corp.*v. *Martin Katz Corp.,*30 A D 2d 571.) They must also be sufficiently specified so that their correctness can be tested entry by entry *(Innis, Pearce & Co.*v. *G. H. Poppenberg, Inc.,*213 App. Div. 789, 790; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 3016.07, 3016.19).

In this case there was a failure of compliance by the plaintiff. It merely attached to its verified complaint 10 invoices containing 23 items for services rendered on various dates by its employees. These invoices appear to be in a form which includes unit price, total charge, legends, names, and symbols which at best require further explanation to comprehend. On one invoice *836alone there are four separate items listed. This does not comply with the rule, nor can it be considered to be a schedule in the true sense of the word. As they now stand the invoices simply cannot be tested item by item. (Cf. *Arel Inc.*v. *Optics Mfg. Corp.,*35 Misc 2d 856.)

While the complaint does not comply with the requirements of CPLR 3016 (subd. [f]) it is sufficient as a pleading and therefore defendant’s general denial is also sufficient *(Innis, Pearce & Co.*v. *G. H. Poppenberg, Inc.,*supra) and he is entitled to his bill.of particulars.

Accordingly, the motion is denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOHAMED SALAHELDIN SHARAWI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71453

Agency No. A020-812-153

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

 Mohamed Salaheldin Sharawi, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance,

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71453

Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam), and

we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance where

Sharawi did not demonstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant

a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Baires v. INS, 856 F.2d 89, 92-

93 (9th Cir. 1988). 

Sharawi’s remaining contentions are unavailing. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Ecoloclean  Industries,  Inc., (the  "Company"),  hereby certify that, to the
best of my  knowledge,  the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
period  ended  December  31,  2003  (the  "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition  and results of operation of the Company.  A
signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  registrant  and will be retained  by it and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: March 30, 2004.

                                                          /s/ Michael Ward
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         Michael Ward
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Human Capital        September 19, 2018        Dave Roddy

Satellite imagery        August 31, 2009        Impact
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William W. Reid, Principal Executive Officer and I, Frank L. Jennings, Principal Financial
Officer of Gold Resource Corporation (the Company) certify that:

1.       
          I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

2.       
          Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
          statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
          made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
          and

3.       
          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
          included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
          and for, the period presented in this annual report.

Date:  April 14, 2009

/s/ William W. Reid William
W. Reid Principal Executive Officer

/s/ Frank L. Jennings Frank L.
Jennings Principal Financial Officer

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Upheaval Dome

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Photography        July 5, 2016        Canyonlands Satellite View
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Using vertical Fourier transforms to invert potential-field data to magnetization or density models in the presence of topography      

      October 31, 2014    

A physical property inversion approach based on the use of 3D (or 2D) Fourier transforms to calculate the potential-field within a 3D (or 2D) volume from a known physical property distribution within the volume is described. Topographic surfaces and observations at arbitrary locations are easily accommodated. The limitations of the approach and applications to real data are considered.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeffrey Phillips

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

jeff@usgs.gov

303-236-1206

## Related Content

#### Jeffrey Phillips

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

jeff@usgs.gov

303-236-1206

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.18






Dynex Capital, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation
As of May 16, 2017






Cash Compensation


Annual retainer
Non-Employee Director                            $ 55,000 
Chairperson of the Board                         $ 15,000
Audit Committee Chairperson                        $ 10,000
Compensation Committee Chairperson                    $   5,000
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson        $   5,000


Annual retainers are payable in quarterly installments, prorated for the number of months served in the case of a change during the calendar year.  




Excess meeting fee
In addition to the annual retainers, non-employee directors will also receive a cash fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or a Board Committee attended as a member in excess of 15 meetings per year.






Equity Compensation


Non-employee directors will also receive an annual grant of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock with a grant date fair value of $50,000, which shares will vest at the end of one year.  The shares are to be granted on the first Friday following the annual meeting of shareholders.
**Exhibit 10.24**

 

**AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

**THISAMENDMENT AGREEMENT**ismade as of the 13th day of March, 2006 effective as of March 1,2006.

 

**BETWEEN**:

(1)                                                          **Ness Technologies, Inc.**a DelawareCorporationof Kiryat Atidim,Israel( hereinafter including any subsidiary the **“Company”**)

 

(2)                                                          **Mr. Tuvia Feldman**(the **“Executive”**)

 

WHEREAS,the Parties have previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of December 12,1995 and addendum as of August 27, 2000 (the “**Employment Agreement**”), setting forth the terms and conditionsof the employment relationship of the Executive with the Company;

 

WHEREAS,the Parties desire to amend the provisions of the Employment Agreement in themanner hereinafter appearing:

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**,in consideration of the premises, and intending to be legally bound, theparties hereto hereby agree as follows:

 

1.                                       Inthis Agreement, unless there is something in the subject or contextinconsistent therewith, capitalized terms appearing in this Agreement shallhave the meaning assigned to them in the Employment Agreement

 

2.                                       TheEmployment Agreement shall hereby be amended as follows:

 

In section H (1) and H (2) theadvance notice period upon termination by either party shall be extended to 12months.

 

3.                                       Exceptas set forth in Section 2 hereof, the terms, conditions and agreements setforth in the Employment Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shallcontinue in full force and effect.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

 
| **Ness Technologies Inc.** |                   |
|----------------------------|------------------------|
|                       |                   |
| BY:                        | /s/ AHARON  FOGEL      |   |   | /s/ RAVIV ZOLLER |   |   |
|                       | Aharon Fogel           |   | Raviv Zoller |   |   |
| Title:                     | Chairman of  the Board |   | President and CEO |   |   |
|                       |                   |   |   |   |
|                       |                   |   |   |   |
| The Executive              |                   | /s/ TUVIA FELDMAN |   |   |
|                       |                   | Tuvia Feldman |   |   |
|                            |                        |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30512]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(22)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - (-)utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Project        November 5, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Monitoring Study

Project        July 24, 2021        Quantifying Nutrient Mass and Internal Cycling in Great Salt Lake
Shawn Wayne ELLIOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-2267

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 316th District Court of Hutchinson County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on December 5,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of J.W.V. and L.M.V., Children

Case Number: 07-14-00303-CV Trial Court Number: 40,431

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 5, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on February 23, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY