UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

(FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION) 

INRE: 

SAMUEL F. WORRELL 

Debtor 

SAMUEL F. WORRELL 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DITECH FINANCIAL SERVICING LLC, et al, 

Defendants. 

Case No.:21-20622-PDR 

Chapter 13 

Adversary Proceeding 

Case No.: 21-01382 

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST 

DEFENDANTS DITECH FINANCIAL SERVICING LLC, ET AL, AND ITS LOCAL 

FORECLOSURE COUNSEL, WITH SUPPORTING AFFIDAVITS AND EXHIBITS, 

AND PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

PLAINTIFF, SAMUEL F. WORRELL, the Debtor in the underlying bankruptcy Chapter 

13 Case Number: 2 l-20622(PDR), commenced Adversary Proceedings (AP) Case Number: 2 l01382(PDR) against DEFENDANTS DITECH FINANCIAL SERVICING, et al, and its local 

foreclosure attorneys (hereafter DEFENDANTS-DITECH). DEFENDANTS-DITECH were 

given notice and duly served with Summons for the AP Complaint and informed of the duty to 

timely file a sufficient answer in accordance with the law and governing Procedural Rules of this 

Court. DEFENDANTS-DITECH have failed to sufficiently answer PLAINTIFF'S AP 

Complaint. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 55, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and pertinent 

Bankruptcy Rules, PLAINTIFF is entitled to entry of FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

against DEFENDANTS-DITECH, and in support thereof PLAINTIFF states as follows: 

- 1 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 1 of 16
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND BASIS FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT BY 

DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS-DITECH 

1. On 08/24/2021 despite knowing full well that they possessed no legal standing nor 

legitimate grounds for foreclosure DEFENDANTS-DITECH filed false documents and 

pros~cuted fraudulent claims against PLAINTIFF in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court (the 

state foreclosure Court1

) under Case No. CACE # 16001954. 

2. On 09/14/2021 the state foreclosure court, despite strong objections, wrongfully granted 

DEFENDANTS-DITECH an order to sell PLAINTIFFS home without DEFENDANTSDITECH showing competent evidence of foreclosure standing. 

3. On 10/25/2021 DEFENDANTS-DITECH proceeded with its fraudulently secured court 

order and scheduled a sale, and knowingly purchased and published false advertising in support 

of the unlawful foreclosure sale (Exhibit A). 

4. On 11/05/2021 in light of the foregoing facts, for the fourth time in three years, 

PLAINTIFF was forced to file for bankruptcy to prevent the illegal sale of his home by 

DEFENDANTS-DITECH (See case No.:18-19013-JKD; No.19-21221-JKD, Case No.20-11803-

PGH; and the current Case No.: 21-20622(PDR)). 

5. On 11/18/2021 PLAINTIFF filed a Complaint to open Adversary Proceedings Case No.: 

21-01382-PDR within the instant Chapter 13, seeking to hold DEFENDANTS-DITECH and its 

local foreclosure attorneys accountable for their misdeeds. 

6. On 11/18/2021 when the AP Complaint was filed this Court served DEFENDANTSDITECH with the Summons and legal notice of commencement of the Adversary Proceedings; 

i.e. AP Case No.: 21-01382-PDR. 

1 The foreclosure court can harvest significant foreclosure fees when a foreclosure is successfully 

completed. 

- 2 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 2 of 16
7. Further, the Summons required DEFENDANTS-DITECH to by 12/20/2021 file a 

sufficient reasonable answer to the serious incendiary charges brought in the AP Complaint, 

which DEFENDANTS-DITECH failed to do. 

8. Moreover, as of this date, DEFENDANTS-DITECH have chosen to purposefully avoid 

appearing in the bankruptcy proceedings and have ignored their legal duties by continually 

failing to show a lawful or even reasonable basis for its alleged (false) foreclosure claims against 

PLAINTIFF. 

9. DEFENDANTS-DITECH have also sought no extension nor enlargement oftime to 

answer. 

10. Instead, DEFENDANTS-DITECH are attempting to continue concealing their fraudulent 

actions against PLAINTIFF by not specifically answering any of the allegations detailed in the 

AP Complaint instituted against them. 

11. Rather, DEFENDANTS-DITECH are now seeking to abruptly assume the identity of a 

third-party stranger entity (aka "NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE 

SERVICING, and HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.) in order to file irrelevant documents in 

PLAINTIFF'S underlying Chapter 13 Case No.: 21-20622(PDR). 

12. Additionally, DEFENDANTS-DITECH have purposefully ignored and disregarded 

essential Rules governing appearing and practicing in Bankruptcy Court2• 

13. DEFENDANTS-DITECH have failed to swear a sufficient oath, and to show evidence of 

qualification to practice before the Bar in Federal Bankruptcy Court. Hence the DEFENDANTSDITECH have failed to make a proper appearance in the Bankruptcy Court, prior to attempting 

to file irrelevant and or false documents into the bankruptcy court docket. 

2 Pursuant to federal law under title 18 and elsewhere, anyone who knowingly makes false claims in Bankruptcy 

Court is subject to felony conviction, severe fines, and/ or imprisonment. 

- 3 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 3 of 16
14. Instead, DEFENDANTS-DITECH and its local foreclosure counsel now seek this 

Court's cooperation to advance their deception and fraud by attempting to appear as a previously 

unnamed nonparty stranger-entity (aka "NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE 

SERVICING, and HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.); a nonparty clearly not named at any time in the AP 

Complaint that was filed, because it clearly was not involved at any point in DEFENDANTSDITECH bogus foreclosure action, wrongful judgment, and forced sale of PLAINTIFF'S home. 

15. This Court may not however lawfully facilitate nor tolerate such antics, especial from 

other members of the legal community and active members of the Florida state Bar Association. 

BASIS FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS-DITECH 

AND MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

16. PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR hereby repeats, reiterates, and incorporates the afore stated facts 

contained in his AP Complaint previously filed with this Court (DE #1), and in the afore stated 

paragraphs 1 through 14 as thought fully set forth herein, and further asserts that: 

17. DEFENDANTS-DITECH have defaulted before this Court in their duty to timely file by 

12/20/2021 a sufficient answer or other credible response to the serious claims in the Complaint 

filed against DEFENDANTS-DITECH. 

18. DEFENDANTS-DITECH failed in their duty to make proper appearance in these 

proceedings prior to seeking to file documents in the case docket. 

19. DEFENDANTS-DITECH ignored the duty to show sufficient evidence that they are duly 

admitted to practice before the Bankruptcy Court, and that they have taken an oath pledging to 

follow the Rules, Practices, and Procedures governing the conduct of attorneys in Bankruptcy 

Court, including not intentionally deceiving the Court - which is in stark contrast to their casual 

misdeed in the state foreclosure court. 

- 4 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 4 of 16
20. Indeed, by abruptly and immediately switching identity in this Court DEFENDANTSDITECH fully concede to knowingly acting fraudulently against PLAINTIFF in its state 

foreclosure court proceedings. 

21. And by attempting to continue its deceptions and fraudulent claims simply by suddenly 

switching identity and by appearing as a stranger, third-party, nonparty (to wit aka "NEWREZ 

LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, and HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.) who is 

clearly irrelevant to DEFENDANTS-DITECH'S bogus foreclosure claims and unlawful forced 

sale of PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR'S home it demonstrates the willfulness of its misconduct. 

22. Moreover, by attempting to deceptively file misleading irrelevant documents into the 

docket of this case, including DE #'s 13 & 14, and a grossly legally insufficient purported 

answer to the AP Complaint on 12/17/2021, DEFENDANTS-DITECH'S counsel are proceeding 

in continuing direct violation of any oaths taken for admittance to the state and federal Bar, and 

thereby also expressly disqualified themselves from appearing before this Court. 

23. Additionally, by now attempting to argue that a different entity other than 

DEFENDANTS-DITECH is the true "Secured Creditor" entity with foreclosure standing they 

have by judicial estoppel, precluded this Court (and any Court for that matter) from relying on 

such false statements and testimony. 

24. DEFENDANTS-DITECH are required continually to comply strictly with all aspects of 

the law, civil procedures, and the Bankruptcy Code, including performing their duty to promptly 

file with this Court legitimate Rule 3001 Proofs of Claims and legally sufficient evidence of any 

claim(s), secured or unsecured, that it seeks to assert in strict compliance with Bankruptcy Rule 

3001, which DEFENDANTS-DITECH avoids, and failed to do. 

- 5 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 5 of 16
25. Additionally, DEFENDANTS-DITECH are required to sufficiently comply with other 

relevant bankruptcy court orders, including those by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Southern District of New York (Case No. 19-10412-JLG), to the extent that violating such orders 

constitute fraudulent acts by DEFENDANTS-DITECH. 

26. These matters are Core Proceedings under the U. S. Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. §§ 1334 & 157(G) and is exclusively within bankruptcy jurisdiction. 

27. The Bankruptcy Court has exclusive jurisdiction and authority in this matter, pursuant to 

its statutory mandate by Congress to enforce federal bankruptcy law; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334, 157 and 

§§ 105 and 523. (Bankruptcy General Powers). 

28. PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR'S AP Complaint constitutes an action for Declaratory Relief 

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105, and other pertinent statutory authority. 

29. 11 U.S.C. § 105 vests bankruptcy judges with broad discretion and powers to "issue any 

order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this 

title"; 28 U.S.C. §§ 151, 1334(a), 1471(e); Rules 7001, 9014. 

30. This Court has expressed statutory authority to re-open a case for good cause shown, and 

to serve justice; 11 U.S.C. §§ 105,350; Rule 60(b)(4). 

AFFIDAVIT STATEMENT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE STATUS 

IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, ET AL, 

AND ITS LOCAL FORECLOSURE COUNSEL 

IN THE STA TE OF FLORIDA, 

BROW ARD COUNTY, ss: 

The undersigned, SAMUEL F. WORRELL, being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says: 

1. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a minor. 

- 6 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 6 of 16
2. I am a resident of the State of Florida. 

3. I am legally competent and capable in every respect to make the statements contained 

herein, and to execute this document. 

4. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and, if needed, can testify as to the 

accuracy and completeness thereof. 

5. I declare to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the statements and information set 

forth herein are true, correct, and complete. 

6. After reasonable inquiry into the military status of the DEFENDANTS named in this 

case, including querying the government's manpower data center (DMDC) database with 

their correct name and known information, it was determined that these individuals are 

not s~rving on mil_it~ A~tive Duty, nor otherwise protected by provins· s of the 

Serv1cemember Civil Rehef Act (SCRA), that woul preclude entry o a efault 

judgment against the DEFENDANTS. 

Dated: Tuesday, January 4, 2022. Signed: l · 

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

IN THE ST A TE OF FLORIDA, 

BROWARD COUNTY, ss: 

Subscribed and sworn to before me, in my presence, 

B eans o:::cal z,~ January 2022. 

V (Notary Signature) 

My commission expires eg\ \ a-\Q\o J\ 'r-

\ \ 

This person is personally known to me ____ ; or 

•

JhellNW.. 

Notary Publlc 

State of Flortda 

Comm# HH08163l 

Expires 8/U/l024 

Type of identification produced:~,·,~ ctr\ \l Ll16 \, C .. Q .. JtVol; 

- 7 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 7 of 16
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COMPLAINT and 

PETITION was furnished to the parties listed on the service list below, via United States Postal 

Service (USPS) 'Certified Mail' and/or E-mail in accordance with the corresponding addresses 

listed therein, on the 4th day of January 2022. D 

Signed: _...,,_~--+---\....._(--=--~-

SAMUEL WO LL INTIF - EBTOR, pro se. 

7420 N.W. 41 Cb~LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA 33319 

SERVICE LIST 

ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC 

Attorneys for Ditech Financial Servicing, LLC, et al, 

6409 Congress Ave, Suite 100 

Boca Raton, Florida, 33487 

Attn: Marni Sachs 

Marni Sachs, Esquire 

Attn: Scott Brown 

Scott Brown, Esquire 

Florida Bar No.88187 

Communication Email: sbrown@raslg.com 

- 8 -

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 8 of 16
INRE: 

SAMUEL F. WORRELL 

Debtor 

SAMUEL F. WORRELL 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

Case No.:21-20622-PDR 

Chapter 13 

Adversary Proceeding 

Case No.: 21-01382-PDR DITECH 

FINANCIAL SERVICING LLC, et al, 

Defendant. 

PROPOSED 

DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT 

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS 

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, ET AL, AND ITS LOCAL FORECLOSURE COUNSEL, WITH 

SUPPORTING AFFIDAVITS, EXHIBITS, AND PROPOSED 

FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT 

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR'S Adversary Proceedings (AP) 

Complaint for Declarative Relief (Case No.: 21-01382) filed against DEFENDANTS DITECH 

FINANCIAL SERVICING LLC, ET AL AND ITS LOCAL FORECLOSURE COUNSEL, namely the 

attorneys of ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC, for Actual 

Fraud; False Pretenses; False Representation; Willful and malicious injury; Validity, Priority or extent of 

lien or other interest in Debtor's homestead property; Section 523(a) Dischargeability; And Chapter 11 

Bankruptcy Fraud (pursuant to Case: 19-10412-JLG). This Court has carefully reviewed the entire 

Court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 9 of 16
FINDINGS 

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter herein. 

2. PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR'S Adversary Complaint for Declarative Relief against DEFENDANTSDITECH FINANCIAL SERVICING LLC, ET AL (hereafter DEFENDANTS-DITECH) and its 

foreclosure counsel of ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC 

(hereafter defendants' local foreclosure counsel) and Summons was duly served upon 

DEFENDANTS-DITECH by service to defendants' local foreclosure counsel. 

3. The equities in this case rests with the PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR, SAMUEL F. WORRELL and 

against DEFENDANTS-DITECH and defendants' local foreclosure counsel who are in default 

for failing to timely file a sufficient answer to PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR'S AP Complaint during 

the time set to file an answer. 

4. PLAINTIFF-DETOR have provided the Court with an affidavit of non-military status supporting 

and attesting to the fact that the default is not due to military service. 

5. DEFENDANTS-DITECH failed to timely file by the prescribed time of 12/20/2021, a legally 

sufficiently answer to the AP Complaint and the allegations therein and failed to request or 

obtain an extension. 

6. Accordingly, DEFENDANTS-DITECH are in default and PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR is entitled to 

judgment by default on each of the claims brought against DEFENDANT-DITECH and its 

foreclosure counsel contained the AP Complaint - to wit: 

Actual Fraud; False Pretenses; False Representation; Willful and malicious injury; Validity, 

Priority or extent oflien or other interest in Debtor's homestead property; Section 523(a) 

Dischargeability; And Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Fraud (pursuant to Case 

7. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 10 of 16
8. DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR 

against defaulting DEFENDANTS-DITECH and defendants' local foreclosure counsel. 

9. PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR is therefore entitled to, and hereby granted entirely, the reliefrequested 

in the AP Complaint filed in this Court against DEFENDANTS-DITECH and defendants' local 

foreclosure counsel. 

10. Further, the request to re-open case 19-21221-JKD in hereby GRANTED for a full accounting 

and examination of payments made to and from the bankruptcy estate. And to know whether 

DEFENDANTS-DITECH and defendants' local counsel obtained payments from PLAINTIFFDEBTOR by deception, fraud, or false pretense. 

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 

11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over this matter for 

purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order. 

12. The Court reserves exclusive jurisdiction over this matter to determine the appropriate amount 

of equitable or declarative relief with respect to PLAINTIFF-DEBTOR'S AP Complaint, 

including any consequential and punitive damages allowed by statute, and for the purpose of 

enforcement, and to award such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper under 

the circumstances. 

DONE AND ORDERED IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Southern 

District of Florida this ______ January 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Signed: _______________ _ 

Honorable Peter D. Rossin 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT JUDGE 

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 11 of 16
SERVICE LIST 

ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC 

Attorneys for Ditech Financial Servicing, LLC, et al, 

6409 Congress Ave, Suitel00 

Boca Raton, Florida, 33487 

Attn: Marni Sachs 

Marni Sachs, Esquire 

Attn: Scott Brown 

Scott Brown, Esquire 

Florida Bar No.88187 

Communication Email: sbrown@raslg.com 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 12 of 16
Filing# 137909297 E-Filed 11/04/2021 01:12:55 PM 

BROWARD DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW 

PubHaned Daily excopt Satu'day, Sunday and 

Legal Holidays 

Fl Laudarclale, Broward County, Florida 

STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY 

OF BROWARD: 

Before the undersigned autllortty personally appaarad 

SCHERRIE A. THOMAS. wha on oath says that he or she is 

the LEGAL CLERK, of the Browanl Daly Buliness Review f/ 

k/a Broward Review, a daDy (except Saturday, Sunday and 

Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Fort Lauderdale, In 

Broward County, FIOrida; that the attached copy of 

advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the 

matter of 

CACE-16-001954 

NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE SALE 

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, ETC. 

VS. SAMUEL H. WORRELL, ET AL. 

in the CIRCUIT Court, 

waa published in said newapaper in the iasues of 

10/251202111/01/2021 

affiant further says that he or she 

promiHd any perwon, firm or 

rebate, comrnia&lon or refund tor Iha •A:;ne;"' fer publication In 

'}){ALU\ 

SCHERRIE A. THOMAS personally known to me 

····~ii;!~:--. BARBARA JEAN COOPER f!~"°":\ Notary Public • State of Florida i.JW~'1/ Commission It GG 292953 

·· ..•. 9.~ "':'.'.~· My Comm. Expires Jan 21, 2023 

Bonded thrOUjh National Notary Assn. 

NOnCaOF 

FOMCLCJaURIIIALE 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 

SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 

IN _AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, 

FLORIDA 

GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 

CASE NO. CACE-16-011954 

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC F/K/A GREEN 

TREE SERVICING U.C, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SAMUEL H. WORRELL AND OONNA 

L. WORRB.L . NA GIBSON, 

et al. 

Defendant{&). 

NOTICE IS H11:t11:~.-,1:: 

Judgm 

February 21, 

-16-001954 the Circuit 

the SEVENTEENTH Judicial 

for Broward CoUAty, . DfTECH ANANCIAL 

C FIK/A TREE SERVICING 

is the Plaintiff and SAMua F. 

LL; DONNA L WORREU. A/KIA _.'""'II._,.,.,,~,. GIBSON are the Defendant(a). 

RENDA D. FORMAN as the Clerk 

of the Circuit Court wiU sell to the 

highest and ~ bidder for cash at 

www.broward.realforeclose.com, at 

10:00 AM, on November 09, 2021, 

the following described property es set forth in said Fmal Jud(Jnenl, to wit 

LOT 6: BLOCK 1, OF BOULEVARD 

NORTH ACCORDING TO THE 

PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN 

Pi.AT BOOK 92, PAGE 18 OF 

THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF 

BROWARD COVNTY, FLORIDA 

Property Acttess: 7420 tNI 41ST 

CT, l.AUDERl-a.L, Fl 33319 

Mi 1)4111C111 ci.rning III intareet In 

the iupus fnim the Ille, If MY, ohr 

tw, the praperly CIIIIIW D of the clllll 

of 1he la pandlnl must 1le 8 olaim 

in acocnllla wilh Florida Slatutea, 

Sec:tion "5.031. 

Dalld tlla 19d1J of 0ctcber, 2021. 

ROBERTSON, AN8CHUTZ, 

ICHEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, 

PU.C 

Atl0mey for Plalnllff 

8408 Cong,1118 Ave., Suite 100 

Boca Raton, Fl 33487 

Telephone: 581-241-al01 

Facsimile: 581-897-8909 

s.w:e Email: flmallOraalg.GOm 

By: JMB HUl10N, ESQUIRE 

Florida Bir No. 881162 

~- Colmuiclllion Emal: 

IMPORTANT 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 13 of 16
If )'OU 8111 I l,lllllOII wilt! 8 dlaabilly 

who needs any llCCommodatian in 

Cider to~ In lllild Jll'OCeedlng, 

)'OU .. entlUed, at no cost to )'011, 

to Ille P10Vi11ion d certain USlstance. 

Please contact 1fle ADA Coordinator, 

Room WW20140, 201 S.E. Silclh S1n!et, 

Fort l.aldardate. Flclida 33301, 954-

831-m1 at 1111111t 1 11ays befor8 yoi, 

8Cheduled court IIPPeln:e, or iftme.. 

dla1lly ~ l9C8Mrlg lhls IIOll1lcatiori 

if Ille lime befon, lie echedulect apP1181'11nce la lass than 7 days; if )'OU 

--~ DI'~ Impaired, cal 711. lS-078917- MaS 

1°'2511/1 21~ 

-----·--

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 14 of 16
Filing# 134596335 E-Filed 09/14/2021 06:32:13 PM 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 

IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 

CASE NO. CACEl 6001954 DIVISION .ll. JUDGE Andrea Gundersen 

Ditech Financial LLC 

Plaintiff(s) / Petitioner(s) 

v. 

Samuel H Worrell, et al 

Defendant(s) / Respondent(s) 

I -----------

ORD SETTING/RESETTING FORECLOSURE SALE 

UPON Motion of the Plaintiff, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC F/K/A GREEN TREE SERVICING 

LLC, and the Court being duly advised via Zoom Hearing on September 8, 2021, where no 

Defendant appeared despite proper notice, it is hereby: 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs Motion to Reschedule Foreclosure Sale is hereby GRANTED. 

2. The public sale scheduled to be held in this action on February 12, 2020 is 

hereby rescheduled pursuant to the provisions of the Final Judgment entered in this action on 

February 21, 2018. The Clerk is directed to set a public sale on the property on the first 

available sale date, to wit: NOVEMBER 9, 2021, at 10:00 AM, at 

www. broward. realforeclose. com. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, at Broward County, Florida on 09-14-2021. 

CACE16001954 09-14-2021 4:37 PM 

Hon. Andrea Gundersen 

CIRCUIT JUDGE 

Electronically Signed by Andrea Gundersen 

Copies Furnished To: 

JONATHAN IAN MEISELS, E-mail: FLmail@raslq.com 

Marni Sachs , E-mail : Efile@rasflaw.com 

Marni Sachs , E-mail : msachs@rasflaw.com 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 15 of 16
Samuel H Worrell, E-mail: sammyhw@bellsouth.net 

Scott A Brown , E-mail : sbrown@rasflaw.com 

Scott A Brown , E-mail : mail@rasflaw.com 

Case No: CACE16001954 

Page 2 of 2 

Case 21-01382-PDR Doc 14 Filed 01/04/22 Page 16 of 16