alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Tritium in unsaturated zone gases and air at the Amargosa Desert Research Site, and in spring and river water, near Beatty, Nevada, May 1997      

      June 1, 1998    

View Document

Elevated tritium concentrations in the unsaturated zone at the Amargosa Desert Research Site (ADRS), immediately south and west of the low-level radioactive-waste burial site south of Beatty, Nevada, have stimulated research of processes that control the transport of tritium in arid unsaturated zones. In May 1997, 58 samples were collected from 1.5 m (meters) depth within a 250 m by 250 m grid at the ADRS. Measured concentrations ranged from 16 ± 9 to 36,900 ± 300 tritium units (TU), decreasing from northeast to southwest, possibly along an ancestral Amargosa River channel.

The 10 air ports at test hole UZB-2 also were sampled, including ports at 57.6, 106.4, and 108.8 m depths that had not been sampled since 1994. Of the remaining seven ports, five were sampled in 1994, 1995, and 1996, and two were sampled in 1994 and 1996. Tritium concentrations at the four ports deeper than 50 m ranged from 791 ± 15 to 1765 ± 29 TU, having increased since they were last sampled. Tritium concentrations at the six ports shallower than 50 m ranged from 367 ± 11 to 1283 ± 20 TU, and appear to have stabilized since 1996.

Tritium concentration in water vapor collected from air within the creosote bush canopy was 75 ± 9 TU near test hole UZB-2 and 9 ±6 TU near the uncontaminated Fischer test hole, 3.2 km to the south. Elevated tritium concentration in air near test hole UZB-2 was attributed to plant transpiration removing water from the unsaturated zone. Nearby surface water tritium concentrations were 6.3 ± 0.4 TU at Specie Spring, 0.0 ± 0.3 TU at Lower Indian Springs and at Upper Indian Springs, and 0.8 ± 0.6 TU in Amargosa River water.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Rob Striegl

##### Emeritus Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

rstriegl@usgs.gov

303-541-3091

## Related Content

#### Rob Striegl

##### Emeritus Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

rstriegl@usgs.gov

303-541-3091

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Nevada Water Science Center          

2730 N. Deer Run RoadSuite 3Carson City, NV89701United States

(775) 887-7600

(775) 887-7629

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - amargosa desert research site
                  - nevada

View All **
STATE EX REL. Jerome JONES v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1445

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Jones v. State, 15-1791 (La. 10/28/16), 203 So.3d 1029.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-0183 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-016-AD

Helicopter Model: Kaman Aerospace Corporation Model K-1200 helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 16 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent damage to the main rotor flight controls 

and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter

Labor per Helicopter

(0.5 work hours X $85 for 

revising the flight manual)

$43

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $43

Total US Fleet Cost $688

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Kirk Gustafson
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)
J.W., Father of A.W., W.W., L.W., P.W., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
  Mediacom
    Broadband LLC
  Schedule
    of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
    Preferred Dividends
  For the Years Ended December 31,2007


2006


2005


2004


2003(In thousands, except ratio amounts)Earnings:Income (loss) before income taxes

$
5,274


$
(15,238
)

$
11,003


$
34,852


$
10,082Interest expense, net


120,673



109,869



97,282



86,125



82,536Amortization of capitalized interest


1,114



962



821



695



503Amortization of debt issuance costs


1,989



2,622



4,600



2,099



2,365Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


2,904



2,803



2,289



2,137



2,086Earnings available for fixed charges

$
131,954


$
101,018


$
115,995


$
125,908


$
97,572Fixed Charges:Interest expense, net

$
120,673


$
109,869


$
97,282


$
86,125


$
82,536Capitalized interest


2,045



1,675



1,558



1,270



3,425Amortization of debt issuance costs


1,989



2,622



4,600



2,099



2,365Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


2,904



2,803



2,289



2,137



2,086Preferred dividends


18,000



18,000



18,000



18,000



18,000Total fixed charges

$
145,611


$
134,969


$
123,729


$
109,631


$
108,412Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends














1.15



Deficiency of earnings over fixed charges

$
(13,657
)

$
(33,951
)

$
(7,734
)

$



$
(10,840
)     (1)
    
    A reasonable approximation (one-third) is deemed to be the
    interest factor included in rental expense.
Exhibit
31.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427





I, Kevin
R. Keating, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Catalyst Lighting Group,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;





c)
disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      December 26, 2008
              /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                Kevin
      R. Keating
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                Principal
      Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00534

- CR

Steven Ryan NEVILS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 548755 Honorable Jason Roland Garrahan, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record originally was due on November 12, 2018. On November 9, 2018

, two court reporter s filed notifications of late record stating appellant ha s failed to pay or make

arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that eit her (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be d ue within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of November, 2018

.___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.20

TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC.  SUMMARY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the Company's current compensation arrangements with its non-employee directors.

Annual Retainer:

$12,500 per calendar quarter ($50,000 annually)Board Meetings

$1,500 for each meeting attended in excess of 10 during any calendar yearCommittee Meetings

$1,500 per meeting ($750 if attended by telephone)Committee Chairs

Audit CommitteeAnnual Retainer of $15,000
Compensation CommitteeAnnual Retainer of $15,000Restricted Stock Grant

A grant of restricted shares annually on the first business day of the calendar year with an aggregate market value of $105,000. To vest in three equal annual installments on the date of grant, the first anniversary
of the date of grant and the second anniversary of the date of grant.


---



QuickLinks
Charlene Marie DURYEA, Appellant, v. Keith Robert BONO, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D17-4314 2D17-4422

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 13, 2018

Elizabeth S. Wheeler of Berg & Wheeler, P.A., Brandon, for Appellant.

Andrea Black of Andrea Black, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, the Mother challenges a Temporary Order for Timesharing, rendered on October 27, 2017 *781(case no. 2D17-4314), and an Amendment to Temporary Order for Timesharing, rendered on November 2, 2017 (case no. 2D17-4422).

We affirm the October 27, 2017, order without comment. However, the November 2, 2017, order was rendered after the notice of appeal in case number 2D17-4314 had been filed. The November 2, 2017, order modified a substantive provision of the October 27, 2017, order and is, therefore, a nullity. *See**Haines v. State*, 805 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter amended order elaborating on original order while appeal was pending; therefore amended order was a nullity): *Albertson's Inc. v. Ferrell*, 647 So.2d 242, 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (holding that amended order making more than clerical corrections was a nullity when it was entered after notice of appeal of the original order). The Father concedes error. Accordingly, we remand with directions to vacate the November 2, 2017, order. *See**Schaeffer v. State*, 995 So.2d 518, 518 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (affirming original order but remanding with directions to vacate amended order "as it was entered without jurisdiction").

Because of the time-sensitive nature of the proceedings below, no motion for rehearing will be considered. The clerk of this court is directed to immediately issue the mandate so that the trial court may enter a final order in this matter.

Affirmed; remanded.

LaROSE, C.J., and BADALAMENTI, J., Concur.
Lachlan ROTSCHREK, Appellant, v. Marguerite MORGAN as Administrator of the Florida State Hospital, and The Department of Children and Families, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE13a-14**

I, Kirk Misaka, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zhone Technologies,Inc.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5.    The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): 

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  

August 14, 2003 

|   | */s/ KIRK MISAKA*                          |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                            |   |
|   | ***Kirk Misaka, Chief Financial Officer*** |   |
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        November 26, 2018        Image of the Week - Antarctica’s Blue Ice

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2200

SUKHJINDER SINGH , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 30, 2023 Decided: April 14, 2023

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Inna Lipkin , LAW OFFICE OF INNA LIPKIN , Redwood City, California, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assist ant Attorney General , Jonathan A. Robbins, Assistant Director , Regina Byrd, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPA RTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2200 Doc: 33 Filed: 04/14/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM : Sukhjinder Singh , a native and citizen of India , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board ) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. After thoroughly reviewing the record,

we are satisfied that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Singh (B.I.A. Sept. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 21-2200 Doc: 33 Filed: 04/14/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the quarterly report of Universal Communication Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: February 17, 2005                 By:  /s/ Michael J. Zwebner
                                             -----------------
                                        Michael J. Zwebner
                                        Chief Executive Officer