alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

ROBERTO FRANCISCO ORUE, II

§

§

§

Case No. 21-10553

(Chapter 13)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT 

IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR RMTP TRUST, SERIES 

2021 COTTAGE-TT-V

Please take notice that the undersigned attorney hereby appears as counsel for U.S. Bank National 

Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for RMTP Trust, Series 2021 Cottage-TTV, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and 

requests that all notices given or required to be given in this case, and all papers served or required to be 

served in this case, including, but without limitation: notices and any orders, applications, complaints, 

demands, hearings, motion, petitions, pleadings or requests, and any other documents brought before this 

Court in this case, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, and whether transmitted or 

conveyed by mail, telephone, facsimile, or otherwise served upon the undersigned attorney at the 

following address:

ReShaundra Suggs

MILLER, GEORGE & SUGGS, PLLC

210 N. University Drive, Suite 900

Coral Springs, FL 33071

Telephone: 786-268-9954

Facsimile: 954-333-6823

rsuggs@mgs-legal.com

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ ReShaundra Suggs

ReShaundra Suggs

State Bar No: 77094 FL

rsuggs@mgs-legal.com

MILLER, GEORGE & SUGGS, PLLC

210 N. University Drive, Suite 900

Case 21-10553-MAM Doc 77 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PAGE 2

Coral Springs, FL 33071

Phone: 786-268-9954

Fax: 954-333-6823

Attorney for U.S. Bank National 

Association, not in its individual capacity 

but solely as trustee for RMTP Trust, Series 

2021 Cottage-TT-V 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was delivered to the addressees on the 

attached mailing list by First Class U.S. Mail postage pre-paid and/or electronic mail this ____ day of 

______________ 20____.

/s/ ReShaundra Suggs

RESHAUNDRA SUGGS

Via Pre-Paid U.S. Mail:

Roberto Francisco Orue, II

7667 NW GreenSpring St

Port Saint Lucie, FL 34987

Debtor(s)

Via ECF:

Justin Andrew Lefko

302 S. Second Street

Fort Pierce, FL 34950

Attorney for Debtor(s)

Robin R. Weiner

P.O. Box 559007

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33355-9007

Chapter 13 Trustee

Office of the US Trustee

51 S.W. 1st Ave., Suite 1204

Miami, FL 33130

U.S. Trustee

25th

September 23

Case 21-10553-MAM Doc 77 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 2
Solomon ROBERTS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Anthony GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1608

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Roberta G. Mandel, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.26

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYEE SUPPLEMENTARY RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

In accordance with Paragraph 12 of the Employee Supplementary Retirement Agreement effective as of the 25th day of August, 1999 by and between the
Ingersoll-Rand Company, hereinafter called the Company, and Herbert L. Henkel, hereinafter called the Employee (the Agreement), the Agreement is hereby amended as set forth below:



| | 1. | The last sentence of Paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read as follows:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Such payments shall commence as of the later of (a) the first day of the seventh month following the date of the Employees separation from service (as determined under the general rules under section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), or (b) the first business day of the first calendar year following the date of the Employees separation from service.



| | 2. | A new Paragraph 14 is added to the Agreement to read as follows:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

This Agreement shall be interpreted and carried out in accordance with all applicable requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement this 22nd day of December, 2008.



Ingersoll-Rand CompanyBy:

/s/ Marcia J. AvedonTitle:

Senior Vice President, HR & Communications/s/ Herbert L. HenkelEmployee
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50247

Summary Calendar

 

PHILIP M. KING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CV-175

- - - - - - - - - -

December 30, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Philip M. King appeals from the district court’s grant of

the City of San Antonio’s motion for a judgment as a matter of

law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 50. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs and AFFIRM the dismissal for essentially the same reasons

set forth by the magistrate judge. King v. City of San Antonio,

No. SA-95-CA-0175 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 1996). Judgment as a matter

of law was proper on King’s ADEA claims because no more than a
No. 96-50247

- 2 -

scintilla of evidence supported a finding that the legitimate

nondiscriminatory basis offered for not hiring King was a

pretext.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Monetary Systems, Ltd.
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Danny W Weibling. Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Danny W
Weibling





Danny W
Weibling


Chief
Financial Officer





November
11, 2008
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 21, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13108

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-22074-CV-JLK

MARK STAMMEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

a foreign corporation,

TOTAL DOLLAR MANAGEMENT EFFORT, LTD.,

a foreign corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 21, 2010)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Mark Stammel appeals an adverse Summary Judgment in favor of Ace

American Insurance Company which had denied coverage to Stammel for the total

loss by fire and the sinking of his yacht. At the time of the casualty, the vessel was

insured by ACE, which denied coverage because the vessel was not equipped with

an automatic fire extinguishing system in the engine pursuant to the following

policy provision:

FIRE EXTINGUISHING AGREEMENT

You agree that your yacht is equipped with a built-in and

automatic system of fire extinguishing apparatus, properly

installed in the engine room and maintained in good and

efficient working order.

On appeal, Stammel argues: (1) that ACE is precluded from applying this

provision because the parties previously agreed that the Vessel was equipped

with an automatic system of fire extinguishing apparatus; (2) that the phrase

“automatic system of fire extinguishing apparatus” is ambiguous; and (3) ACE is

estopped from denying coverage because ACE knew the specific type of fire

equipment on board prior to binding coverage, never objected, and issued

insurance nevertheless.

Having reviewed the record and considered the argument of the parties, we

find no reversible error in the district court’s conclusion that the Fire Extinguishing

2
Agreement was not ambiguous, reasoning that the word “automatic” means

“without human intervention” and Stammel did not comply with the condition of

the policy as the system on his yacht required human activation.

AFFIRMED

3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN LAMARR ANDRES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

MARSHALL, Correctional Officer at RJ 

Donovan; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56057

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-01733-DMSBGS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Kevin Lamarr Andres appeals pro se from the 

district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an unlawful strip 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 15-56057 

search and denial of due process.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (legal 

rulings on exhaustion); Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008) 

(dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). We may affirm on any basis supported 

by the record, Thompson, 547 F.3d at 1058-59, and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Andres’ strip search claim against 

defendant Marshall because Andres failed to exhaust his administrative remedies

in a proper manner. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (“Proper 

exhaustion [of administrative remedies] demands compliance with an agency’s 

deadlines and other critical procedural rules[.]”).

Dismissal of Andres’ due process claim against defendant Briggs alleging 

improper processing of grievances was proper because Andres “lack[s] a separate 

constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure.” Ramirez v. 

Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Andres’ claim 

against Briggs without granting leave to amend because amendment would be 

futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th 

 

1 We address Andres’ excessive force claim in a concurrently filed opinion.
 3 15-56057 

Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Andres’ motions to 

appoint counsel because Andres did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances. 

See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991) (setting forth standard 

of review and requirements for appointment of counsel).

We reject as without merit Andres’ contentions regarding discovery because 

the record was sufficiently developed to resolve his claims.

Andres’ motions to take judicial notice (Docket Entry Nos. 16 and 17) are 

granted.

Andres’ motion to amend and supplement claim (Docket Entry No. 16) is 

denied.

Andres’ motions to appoint counsel (Docket Entry Nos. 16 and 20) are 

denied.

Andres’ motion to withdraw (Docket Entry No. 21) is denied as moot.

Appellees shall bear the costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 570

[Docket No. FR-4155-F-02]
RIN 2506-AB91


Community Development Block Grants: New York Small Cities Program

Correction

    In rule document 97-30940, beginning on page 62912, in the issue of 
Tuesday, November 25, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 62912, in the second column, under Discussion of Public 
Comments, in the second line, ``July '' should read ``June''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 525 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 

the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2015 

Mr. MASSIE (for himself, Mr. POLIS, Mr. HANNA, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. 

SCHRADER, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. AMASH, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. 

FARR, Ms. GABBARD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HONDA, Mr. CLAY, Ms. LEE, 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. PETERSON, Ms. 

PINGREE, Mr. POCAN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. RYAN

of Ohio, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. WELCH, Mr. BUCK, Mr. 

LABRADOR, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. BARR, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. 

YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. WALZ, Mr. YOUNG of Indiana, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. 

NADLER, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. PERRY, Mr. YOHO, Mr. 

MULVANEY, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 525 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Industrial Hemp 

3 Farming Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINI5 TION OF MARIHUANA. 

6 Section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

7 U.S.C. 802) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (16)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘(16) The’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘(16)(A) The’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include in13 dustrial hemp.’’; and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(57) The term ‘industrial hemp’ means the 

16 plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, 

17 whether growing or not, with a delta-9 

18 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 

19 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.’’. 

20 SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION. 

21 Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

22 U.S.C. 811) is amended by adding at the end the fol23 lowing: 

24 ‘‘(i) INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION.—If a per25 son grows or processes Cannabis sativa L. for purposes 

26 of making industrial hemp in accordance with State law, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 525 IH

1 the Cannabis sativa L. shall be deemed to meet the con2 centration limitation under section 102(57).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

## By Location

              - (-)washington(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2021(1)

partnerNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jerry Brown, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BGR Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial position,  results of operations,  and cash
     flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures for the issuer and have:

     (i)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to the  issuer  is made  known to me,
          particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
          prepared;
     (ii) Evaluated the  effectiveness of the issuer's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures as of June 30, 2003; and
     (iii)Presented in the report our  conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on my evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have  disclosed,  based on my most  recent  evaluation,  to the  issuer's
     auditors  and the audit  committee  of the board of  directors  (or persons
     fulfilling the equivalent function):

     (i)  All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,
          process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for
          the issuer's  auditors any material  weaknesses  in internal  controls
          (none were so noted); and
     (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the  issuer's  internal
          controls (none were so noted); and

6.   I have  indicated  in the  report  whether  or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 25, 2003

/s/ Jerry Brown
-----------------------
Jerry Brown
Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1980        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

Center News        June 28, 2022        Asteroid Day: How do you prepare for an asteroid impact?
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Banco de Chile (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  April 27, 2017

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Eduardo Ebensperger O. |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Eduardo Ebensperger O.     |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

 

Date:  April 27, 2017

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Rolando Arias S.    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Rolando Arias S.        |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Banco de Chile and will be retained by Banco de Chile and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(15)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(8)
              - multimedia_image-141771(8)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(4)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(39)
              - idaho(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - (-)north carolina(8)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Salvo, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Hatteras, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Bear Inlet, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Topsail, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Rodanthe, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of New Drum Inlet, Core Banks, North Carolina

Photography        December 31, 2015        Aerial photographs of Oregon Inlet, North Carolina
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Odyssey Oil and Gas, Inc former Advanced
Sports Technologies, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dated indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 7, 2006


By: /s/ Arthur Johnson
    --------------------------------------
    Arthur Johnson
    Principal Executive Officer,
    President, and Chief Financial Officer