alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLD-217 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1996

___________

IN RE: FREDERICK O. BOND,

 Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(Related to D.C. Civil No. 3:09-cv-00290)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. 

June 10, 2010

Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 29, 2010)

_________

 OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Petitioner Frederick Bond, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of

mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania to rule on his pending habeas petition. For the reasons that follow, we will

deny the mandamus petition.
2

Bond is currently serving a twenty-four-month sentence for obstruction of justice

and conspiracy to impede a United States Judge in discharge of official duties. His

expected release date is December 24, 2010.

In November 2009, he filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the District Court, challenging the Bureau of Prisons’ decision that

he spend only the final ninety days of his sentence in a Residential Reentry Center. The

District Court referred the case to a Magistrate Judge, who recommended that the court

dismiss the petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

Bond objected to that recommendation, averring that he had inadvertently failed to

include information in his habeas petition demonstrating that he had exhausted his

administrative remedies. In light of this averment, the District Court entered an order on

March 1, 2010, directing the Government to respond to Bond’s habeas petition within

sixty days of service of the order. In April 2010, Bond filed the instant mandamus

petition, requesting that we compel the District Court to rule on his habeas petition.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy available only in extraordinary cases. See In re Diet

Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). To obtain a writ of

mandamus, a petitioner must demonstrate that (1) there are no other adequate means of

obtaining the underlying relief he seeks, (2) his right to the writ is “clear and

indisputable,” and (3) “the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.” Hollingsworth v.

Perry, 130 S. Ct. 705, 710 (2010) (per curiam) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 
3

Bond has not made this showing here, for he does not need a writ of mandamus to obtain

a ruling on his habeas petition. Although a writ of mandamus may be appropriate when a

district court’s “undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction,” see

Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), that situation is not present here. 

Accordingly, we will deny Bond’s mandamus petition. We trust that, in light of the timesensitivity of his habeas claims, the District Court will rule on his habeas petition in short

order.
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATIONS  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Ian Cray, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of United Biscuits
Finance plc (registrant) and Regentrealm Limited (additional registrant);  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the companies
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companies other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
companies and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the companies, including their
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companies disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)Disclosed in this report any change in the companies internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the companies internal control over financial reporting;
and  2.The companies other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of financial control over financial reporting, to
the companies auditors and the audit committee of companies board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  b)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companies ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and  c)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the companies internal control
over financial reporting.  
   Date:
March 30, 2004  By:
  /s/  Ian CrayIan CrayChief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(33)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(10)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - (-)washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Data Access        March 4, 2019        National Water Information System (NWIS) Mapper
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5092 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5092

 To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 
 the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced in 
        interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2016

 Mr. Harper (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
  Mullin, Mr. Pompeo, and Mr. Stewart) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 
 the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced in 
        interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reinforcing American-Made Products 
Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGULATE LABELING OF 
              PRODUCTS MADE IN THE UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN 
              INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE.

    Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act 
of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``To the extent'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--To the extent'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Effect on State Law.--The provisions of this section shall 
supersede any provisions of the law of any State relating to the extent 
to which a product is introduced, delivered for introduction, sold, 
advertised, or offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce with 
a `Made in the U.S.A.' or `Made in America' label, or the equivalent 
thereof, in order to represent that such product was in whole or 
substantial part of domestic origin.''; and
            (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as designated 
        by paragraph (1), by striking ``Nothing in this section'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (b), nothing in 
        this section''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.6


 





Entrusted Loan Agreement


 


Signature date: 25 July 2016


 


Party A: Beijing Zhongguancun Technology
Financing & Guarantee Co., Ltd


 


Party B: Bank of Beijing Co., Ltd Shuangxiu
Branch


 


Party C: Beijing Reit Technology Development
Co., Ltd


 


Article 1: Party
A will use its own fund under the bank account opened at Party B as principal, and Party A entrusts Party B to release funds to
Party C pursuant to this Agreement.


 


Article 2: the
amount of principal is RMB 10,000,000, and the term of the loan is six (6) months, commencing from 31 August 2016 to 28 February
2017. The term of the loan is effective from the date that the loan was released (if the loan was phrased released then begins
from the date of initial release), if any delay occurs, the initial date and expired date will automatically adjust accordingly.


 


Article 3: the
rate of the loan under this Agreement is 5.655% per year. If Party C cannot pay the principal as agreed in the Agreement, Party
C shall pay the interests in respect of the overdue loan based on the rate under this Agreement with a floating rate of 50%; if
Party C did not use the loan as agreed in this Agreement, Party C shall pay the principal plus interest based on the rate under
this Agreement with a floating rate of 100%.


 


Article 4: the
total loan of RMB 10,000,000 will be released on date of 31 August 2016.


 


Article 5: the
loan will be use as the company’s additional working capital.


 


Article 6: Party
C shall pay the loan for two phases, each phase shall be in the amount of RMB 5,000,000, first phase shall be paid on the date
of 31 January 2017, and second phase shall be paid on the date of 28 February 2017.


 


Article 7: the
interest of the loan under this Agreement shall be paid up as off the expiration date.


 


Article 8: Party
B has the right to charge Party C an annual fee of RMB 8,000, based on an annual rate of 0.8% in respect of the total loan amount
and the term of the loan under this Agreement.


 


Article 9: If any
disputes arise with regard with this Agreement, all parties shall attempt to amicable resolve this dispute, if these negotiations
fail, disputes shall be submitted to people’s court where Party B located for litigation.


 


Article 10: Mr.
Li Hengfang is a guarantor for this loan agreement.


 



    	 	1	 



     

    




 


Sign page:


 


Party A:


Beijing Zhongguancun Technology Financing &
Guarantee Co., Ltd


 


/s/ Hongwei Duna


 


 


Party B:


Bank of Beijing Co., Ltd Shuangxiu Branch


 


/s/ Bo Zhou


 


 


Party C:


Beijing Reit Technology Development Co., Ltd


 


/s/ Hengfang Li


 


2
CGFD44 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 13, 2023

Robert A Mark

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−17096−RAM

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Arnaldo Vicente Amaya

1101 NE 191 St # H−103

Miami, FL 33179

SSN: xxx−xx−3974

ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO TRUSTEE'S REPORT OF

NON−COMPLIANCE BY DEBTOR WITH POST CONFIRMATION PLAN

 As provided under Local Rule 3070−1(C)(2)(c), a Report of Non−Compliance by Debtor with Plan

Payments has been filed by the trustee in this case indicating that the debtor was served by the trustee

with a notice of delinquency which established a deadline for the debtor to become current with plan

payments and that the debtor has failed to meet this deadline.

 Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

Page 1 of 2

Case 21-17096-RAM Doc 91 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 2
1. This case is dismissed.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

3. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United

States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the

balance of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the

trustee shall be applied to this balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in

accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by

the court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all

unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

5. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with

the requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

6. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B)(1), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept

for filing any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior

order of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in

Installments and filing fees remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 21-17096-RAM Doc 91 Filed 01/13/23 Page 2 of 2
Form CGFCRD3T (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−12609−AJC

Chapter: 15

In re:

Performance Insurance Company SPC

c/o Sequor Law

1111 Brickell Avenue

Suite 1250

Miami, FL 33131

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable A. Jay Cristol to consider the

following:

Motion for Order Granting Recognition of Foreign Main Proceeding Pursuant to §§ 1515 and 1517

of the Bankruptcy Code Filed by Debtor Performance Insurance Company SPC. ECF#2

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: April 13, 2021

Time: 02:00 PM

Location: Telephone by CourtSolutions LLC

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by telephone. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Individuals not

represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services free of charge. Although conducted

by telephone, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed.

All participants must exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with

the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 3/22/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Susan Gutierrez

Courtroom Deputy

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 3 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

IN RE: 

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB, CASE NO.: 21-13230-EPK

CHAPTER 7

Debtor.

______________________________/

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB, Adv. No. 21-01155-EPK

Plaintiff,

vs. 

MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION

LOAN AUTHORITY; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND

THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that undersigned counsel hereby enters her appearance in the 

above-captioned case for the United States of America, on behalf of the Department of Education, 

pursuant to Rule 9010(b) the Bankruptcy Rules of Procedure. 

The Clerk of this Court is requested to add the name and address of the undersigned to the 

matrix of creditors prepared in connection with this case.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: /s/Raychelle A. Tasher

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 11 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 3
2

RAYCHELLE A. TASHER

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 109291

Raychelle.Tasher@usdoj.gov

99 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 300

Miami, Florida 33132

Telephone: (786) 439-3185

Facsimile: (305) 530 -7139 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 7, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day by transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF to 

those parties registered to receive electronic notices of filing in this case or via U.S. mail as listed 

in the below Service List.

/s/Raychelle A. Tasher

RAYCHELLE A. TASHER

Service List

VIA CM/ECF Notice:

21-01155-EPK Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Chad T. Van Horn Chad@cvhlawgroup.com, 

chad@ecf.inforuptcy.com,g2320@notify.cincompass.com,chapter7@cvhlawgroup.com,chapter1

3@cvhlawgroup.com,chapter11@cvhlawgroup.com;vanhorn.chadb104447@notify.bestcase.com

Raychelle A Tasher on behalf of Creditor United States of America/Department of Education 

Raychelle.Tasher@usdoj.gov, Milton.Pacheco@usdoj.gov;Shannon.Patterson@usdoj.gov

VIA U.S. MAIL Notice:

Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority

633 Spirit Dr.,

Chesterfiled, MO 63005

The University of Minnesota

211 Bruniniks Hall

222 Pleasant St. SE

Minneapolis, MN 55455

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 11 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 3
3

U.S. Department of Education

Direct Loan Servicing Center

P.O. Box 5609

Greenville, TX 75403-5609

/s/Raychelle A. Tasher

RAYCHELLE A. TASHER

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 11 Filed 09/07/21 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(9)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(30)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(5)
              - hawaii(18)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(14)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 21, 2017        Monitoring Land-Atmosphere Exchange of Moisture to Understand Drought
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc.
(the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kendall Cowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




/s/ Kendall Cowan
--------------------------------------
Name:  Kendall Cowan
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 12, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.