CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST 

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB *** 

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain 

information and documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules 

will not be evaluated for approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist you 

in determining that all necessary materials are included in rules packages sent by the ARB for submittal to 

the EPA, please fill out the following form and include it with the rule package you send ARB. See the 

ARB's Guidelines on the Implementation of the EPA's Draft SIP Completeness Policy, October 1989, for a 

more detailed explanation than is provided here. 

District: South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Rule No.: 1132 

Date Adopted or Amended: 05/05/06 

Rule Title: Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 

 Not 

Attached Attached N/A

(x) ( ) ( ) COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy 

of the entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board. 

(x) ( ) ( ) UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE: If an 

amended rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in 

underline and strikeout format all language which has been added, 

deleted, or changed since the rule was last adopted or amended. 

( ) (x) ( ) COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For 

any rule which includes language specifically referencing another 

rule, a copy of that other rule must also be submitted, unless it has 

already been submitted to EPA as part of a previous SIP submittal. 

(x) ( ) ( ) PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local 

newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication, 

which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an 

alternative, include a copy of the actual published notice of the 

public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this 

case, however, enough of the newspaper page must be included to 

show the date of publication. the notice must specifically identify 

by title and number each rule adopted or amended. 

(x) ( ) ( ) RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk 

certified resolution or minute order. This document must include 

certification that the hearing was held in accordance with the 

information in the public notice. It must also list the rules that 

were adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a 

statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code 

Sections 40725-40728 (Administrative Procedures Act). 

(x) ( ) ( ) PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of 

written public comments made during the notice period and at the 

public hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the 

District staff or presented to the District Board at the public 

hearing. A summary of the public comments and responses is 

adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice 

period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left. 

 

 
TECHNICAL MATERIALS 

 Not 

Attached Attached N/A

(x) ( ) ( ) RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing 

the Rule Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form. 

( ) ( ) (x) NON-EPA TEST METHOD: Include all test methods referenced 

in the rule, but not previously submitted to EPA. Provide an 

explanation of the purpose and principle for the test method and 

include the following supporting technical data: describe the test 

details (number of tests to be carried out, their precision accuracy, 

and repeatability); on a technical basis, compare the method with 

the appropriate EPA/ASTM method; explain the technical 

differences of the two methods and how they affect monitoring of 

the parameters of interest; explain how the test method affects the 

implementation and enforcement of the applicable rule; explain 

the advantages and any potential shortcomings of the test method. 

( ) ( ) (x) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate; in general 

modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to 

determine their impacts on ozone levels. Modeling is required 

where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources (> 100 TPY) 

in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PM10, CO, or NOx 

(for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the 

impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a 

shift in emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back 

to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP 

used the current EPA modeling guidelines. If current EPA 

modeling guidelines were not used, then new modeling may be 

required. 

( ) ( ) (x) ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR 

DEVIATIONS FROM EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, 

describe special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is 

used, extended compliance date are included, etc. A completed 

SIP Approvability Checklist-Enforceability will fulfill this 

requirement. 

(x) ( ) ( ) ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide any other supporting 

information concerning development of the rule or rule changes, 

such as staff reports. 

(ARBFORM - 6/93) 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

SIP APPROVABILITY CHECKLIST-ENFORCEABILITY - Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

 District: South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule No: 1132 

 

 Date Adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended 05/05/06 

 Rule Title: Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities 

 

Date Submitted to ARB: April 28, 2005

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): May 7, 2004 

Is the rule intended to be sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (x) Yes ( ) No. If NO, do not 

complete remainder of form. 

 District Contact: Helmy Sultan Phone Number: (909) 396-2362 

 Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: ( ) New Rule (x) Amended Rule 

Rule 1132- Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities 

was amended to modify the definition of Approved Emission Factors to exclude the use 

of the Unified Emission Factors (UEF) rates for gel coat nonatomizing application 

emissions calculations.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 CO TAC (name): ROG (Such as 

Styrene and Methylmethacrylate)

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

 Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in 

emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet 

showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

 Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease (X) N/A 

 The amendments to Rule 1132 result in no impact on air quality or emissions.

 SCC/CES Code Affected: If a SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code Affected: 3081-89 & 3731-32 

 (NOTE: If more than one SCC or CES code or more than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are 

 needed, fill out the following information on a separate form for each combination of codes.) 

 Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 1998-99 

 

 Area Affected: South Coast Air Quality Management District 

 Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): N/A

 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

SIP APPROVABILITY CHECKLIST-ENFORCEABILITY - Page 2

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: ( ) Attainment (x) Nonattainment ( ) Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 66 

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 % 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 6 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach 

additional sheets as necessary): 

 Facility Name Facility ID Location City County Name

1. Lasco Bathware, Inc. 24060 Anaheim Orange

2. Xerxes Corporation 70021 Anaheim Orange

3. Consolidation Drum 118800 Montebello Los Angeles

4. The Hon Company 006262 South Gate Los Angeles

5. Kushwood Mfg 112597 Ontario San Bernardino 

6. Resinart Corporation 020302 Costa Mesa Orange

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? (x) Yes ( ) No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) (c) of the Rule. 

Section (c) requires 65 percent reduction in VOC emissions using low-VOC materials, 

add-on control or a combination of both techniques. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are the following: 

Section (d)(1)(A) of the Alternative Compliance Plan requires nonatomizing spray 

application technologies for spraying resins. 

 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): (c), (d)(1), (d)(2) and (d)(3). 

Work Practice Standards in Section(s): (d)(1)(A). 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (g)

 

Attach a Completed EPA SIP Approvability Checklist - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent 

Compliance/Enforcement Strategy Statement. 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

SIP APPROVABILITY CHECKLIST-ENFORCEABILITY - Page 3

Discussion: N/A 

District: South Coast Air Quality Management District

Rule No.: 1132 

Date Adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended 05/05/06

Rule Title: Further Control of VOC Emissions from High-Emitting Spray Booth Facilities 

1. APPLICABILITY

a. What sources are being regulated?

Spray booth facilities that emit more than twenty (20) tons of VOC per 

year.

See Section(s): (a) [Rule 1132] 

b. What exemptions are provided?

See Section(s): (a) Applicability exemption [Rule 1132] 

 (h) General exemption [Rule 1132] 

c. What is the calculation procedure for exemptions?

See Section (s): Subdivision (h) [Rule 1132]

d. Is the averaging time used in the rule greater than that of the applicable federal 

ambient standard(s)?

No

e. What are the units of compliance?

See Section(s) (c) and (d) [Rule 1132] 

 f. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? 

Yes, See Section (d)(3) [Rule 1132}

g. If there is a redesignation of the Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) to attainment, 

will this change the emissions limitation in the rule?

No 

2. COMPLIANCE DATES

a. What is compliance date? 

9 January 1, 2002 [Rule 1132]

9 July 1, 2003 [Rule 1132]

9 July 1, 2004 [Rule 1132]

9 December 31, 2004 [Rule 1132]
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

SIP APPROVABILITY CHECKLIST-ENFORCEABILITY - Page 4

See Section (s): (d) and (e) 

b. What is attainment date?

Nitrogen dioxide 12/31/1995

Carbon monoxide 12/31/2000

Ozone 12/31/2010

PM10 12/31/2006

Sulfur dioxide Attained

3. SPECIFICITY OF CONDUCT

a. What test method is required?

See Section(s) (f) [Rule 1132]

b. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

See Section(s) (f) [Rule 1132] c. Is a compliance calculation or evaluation required?

Yes, See Section(s): (c), (d), (f)(2), (h)(1) and (h)(2) [Rule 1132] 

4. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

a. What is District authority for rulemaking?

See Board adoption/amendment Resolution.

b. What methods/rules are incorporated in the rule? 

US EPA Test Methods 18, 24, 24A, 25, 25A and 204 through 204F.

CARB Test Method 422

SCAQMD Test Methods 25.1, 25.3, 302, 303, 304, 309, 312 & 313, 

SCAQMD Rules 102, 109, 1162

5. RECORDKEEPING

a. What records are required to determine compliance?

See Section(s) (g) [Rule 1132]

b. What form or units must the records be kept?

See Section(s): (g) [Rule 1132]

 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

SIP APPROVABILITY CHECKLIST-ENFORCEABILITY - Page 5

c. On what time basis must the records be kept?

See Section(s) (g) [Rule 1132]

 d. Does the rule affirmatively require that the records be kept?

Yes. See Section(s): (g) [Rule 1132] 

6. EXEMPTIONS

a. Are any exemptions allowed?

Yes.

See Section(s): (h) [Rule 1132]

 

 b. What are the criteria for application?

See Section: (h) [Rule 1132]

 

7. MALFUNCTION PROVISIONS

See Section(s): (h)(2) [Rule 1132] 

(ARBFORM - 6/93)