alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Banco de Chile



| | 1. | Banchile Administradora General de Fondos S.A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Banchile Factoring S.A.
| | -- | -----------------------



| | 3. | Banchile Corredores de Seguros Limitada
| | -- | ---------------------------------------



| | 4. | Banchile Corredores de Bolsa S.A.
| | -- | ---------------------------------



| | 5. | Banchile Asesoria Financiera S.A.
| | -- | ---------------------------------



| | 6. | Banchile Securitizadora S.A.
| | -- | ----------------------------



| | 7. | Promarket S.A.
| | -- | --------------



| | 8. | Socofin S.A.
| | -- | ------------



| | 9. | Banchile Trade Services Limited
| | -- | -------------------------------

With the exception of Banchile Trade
Services Limited, which was incorporated in Hong Kong, all of the subsidiaries numerated above have their jurisdiction of incorporation in the Republic of Chile.
James MCINTURFF v. STATE

CR-15-1401

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Reference genome of the California glossy snake, Arizona elegans occidentalis: A declining California Species of Special Concern      

      August 8, 2022    

The glossy snake (Arizona elegans) is a polytypic species broadly distributed across southwestern North America. The species occupies habitats ranging from California’s coastal chaparral to the shortgrass prairies of Texas and southeastern Nebraska, to the extensive arid scrublands of central México. Three subspecies are currently recognized in California, one of which is afforded state-level protection based on the extensive loss and modification of its preferred alluvial coastal scrub and inland desert habitat. We report the first genome assembly of A. elegans occidentalis as part of the California Conservation Genomics Project (CCGP). Consistent with the reference genome strategy of the CCGP, we used Pacific Biosciences HiFi long reads and Hi-C chromatin-proximity sequencing technologies to produce a de novo assembled genome. The assembly comprises a total of 140 scaffolds spanning 1,842,602,218 base pairs, has a contig NG50 of 61 Mb, a scaffold NG50 of 136 Mb, and a BUSCO complete score of 95.9%, and is one of the most complete snake genome assemblies. The A. e. occidentalis genome will be a key tool for understanding the genomic diversity and the basis of adaptations within this species and close relatives within the hyperdiverse snake family Colubridae.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jonathan Q Richmond

##### Geneticist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

jrichmond@usgs.gov

619-225-6434

#### Robert N Fisher

##### Supervisory Research Biologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

rfisher@usgs.gov

619-225-6422

#### Amy Vandergast

##### Supervisory Research Geneticist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

avandergast@usgs.gov

619-225-6445

## Related Content

#### Jonathan Q Richmond

##### Geneticist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

jrichmond@usgs.gov

619-225-6434

#### Robert N Fisher

##### Supervisory Research Biologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

rfisher@usgs.gov

619-225-6422

#### Amy Vandergast

##### Supervisory Research Geneticist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

avandergast@usgs.gov

619-225-6445

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3672

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Hipolito Barajas-Ortiz, also known as *

Polo, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 2, 2009

Filed: November 10, 2009

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Hipolito Barajas-Ortiz challenges the withinGuidelines-range sentence imposed by the district court1

 after he pled guilty to

distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal,

his counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion by not

imposing a sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range. 

1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas. 
We review the imposition of sentences under a deferential abuse-of-discretion

standard, first ensuring that the district court committed no significant procedural

error, and then considering the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. See United

States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (listing factors that

constitute abuse of discretion). We find no abuse of discretion here: the court

specifically and properly addressed multiple sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a), see United States v. Gray, 533 F.3d 942, 944 (8th Cir. 2008); the sentence

was imposed within the undisputed Guidelines range, see Rita v. United States, 551

U.S. 338, 347-50 (2007); and there is no indication that Barajas-Ortiz would be able

to rebut the resulting presumption of reasonableness, see United States v. Cadenas,

445 F.3d 1091, 1094 (8th Cir. 2006).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the

judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

___________________________

-2-
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(7)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1991        In situ 10Be-26Al exposure ages at Meteor Crater, Arizona

publication        December 8, 2016        Transformations to granular zircon revealed: Twinning, reidite, and ZrO2 in shocked zircon from Meteor Crater (Arizona, USA)

publication        August 7, 1974        Guidebook to the geology of Meteor Crater, Arizona

publication        January 1, 1959        Impact mechanics at Meteor Crater, Arizona

publication        December 1, 1980        Measurements of shock-induced luminescence at Meteor Crater, Arizona, from laboratory and airborne Fraunhofer line-discriminator systems

publication        January 1, 1991        Age and geomorphic history of Meteor Crater, Arizona, from cosmogenic 36Cl and 14C in rock varnish

publication        January 1, 1960        First natural occurrence of coesite

publication        January 1, 2005        Geochemical and C, O, Sr, and U-series isotopic evidence for the meteoric origin of calcrete at Solitario Wash, Crater Flat, Nevada, USA

publication        September 1, 1963        Hypervelocity impact of steel into Coconino Sandstone

publication        January 1, 1997        Secrets of the Wabar craters

publication        March 1, 2000        The effects of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater on the geologic framework and the correlation of hydrogeologic units of southeastern Virginia, south of the James River

publication        August 3, 2017        Oxygen and U-Th isotopes and the timescales of hydrothermal exchange and melting in granitoid wall rocks at Mount Mazama, Crater Lake, Oregon

publication        January 1, 2009        Description of Tessaracoccus profundi sp.nov., a deep-subsurface actinobacterium isolated from a Chesapeake impact crater drill core (940 m depth)

Center News        June 28, 2022        Asteroid Day: How do you prepare for an asteroid impact?

publication        December 30, 2020        Outburst floods

publication        October 1, 2014        Dynamics of the Yellowstone hydrothermal system

publication        January 1, 1998        U. S. Geolgogical Survey Flagstaff Field Center

publication        January 1, 1986        Meteoroids and impact craters
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Global Roaming Distribution, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended    December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Michael Thaler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section     1350 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.











Date:  March
      31, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Michael
      ThalerMichael
      Thaler
              Chief
      Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting
    officer)
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eran
      Broshy, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of inVentiv, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of inVentiv.




February
              28, 2007
            By:
            /s/ ERAN
              BROSHYEran
              BroshyChairman
              & Chief Executive Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
708 A.2d 1038

#### Keith N. DEVOE et al. v. Linwood R. TAYLOR et al.

No. 123,

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 11, 1998.

William R. Phelan, Jr., Principal Counsel; John W. Trotz, Associate Sol. (Otho M. Thompson, City Sol., Dept, of Law, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioners.

Michael P. Smith (Marvin Ellin, Ellin and Baker, on brief), Baltimore, for respondents.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER, WILNER and CATHELL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 11th day of May, 1998

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

July 23, 2024

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Stanley Kiszkiel

Stanley Kiszkiel, PA 

10731 SW 29 PL

DAVIE, FL 33328

Leslie W. Langbein

Langbein & Langbein, PA 

8004 NW 154TH ST PMB 353

MIAMI LAKES, FL 33016

Appeal Number: 23-12413-FF ; 23-13392 -FF

Case Style: Carlos Alonso Cano, et al v. 245 C&C, LLC, et al

District Court Docket No: 1:19-cv-21826-JAL

The enclosed order has been ENTERED.

Electronic Filing

All counsel must file documents electronically using the Electronic Case Files ("ECF") system, 

unless exempted for good cause. Although not required, non-incarcerated pro se parties are 

permitted to use the ECF system by registering for an account at www.pacer.gov. Information 

and training materials related to electronic filing are available on the Court's website.

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers

General Information: 404-335-6100 Attorney Admissions: 404-335-6122

Case Administration: 404-335-6135 Capital Cases: 404-335-6200

CM/ECF Help Desk: 404-335-6125 Cases Set for Oral Argument: 404-335-6141

MOT-2 Notice of Court Action

USCA11 Case: 23-12413 Document: 93-1 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 1 of 1

Case 21-19589-LMI Doc 169-2 Filed 08/27/24 Page 1 of 3
In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

Nos. 23-12413, 23-13392

____________________

CARLOS A. ALONSO CANO, 

as next friend of his minor daughters 

Katy Alonso Morejon and Jany Leidy Alonso Morejon, 

FE MOREJON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

JANY L. ALONSO,

Interested Party-Appellant,

versus

245 C&C, LLC, 

CFH GROUP, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 23-12413 Document: 93-2 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 1 of 2

Case 21-19589-LMI Doc 169-2 Filed 08/27/24 Page 2 of 3
2 Order of the Court 23-12413

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-21826-JAL

____________________

Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

We GRANT the Defendants-Appellees’ motion to determine the amount of fees to be awarded as sanctions. Plaintiffs-Appellants do not dispute the lodestar amount proposed by the Defendants-Appellees. And because we find that amount to be reasonable, we award the Defendants-Appellees $21,195 in attorney’s 

fees. The fee award is payable jointly and severally by the PlaintiffsAppellants to the Defendants-Appellees.

USCA11 Case: 23-12413 Document: 93-2 Date Filed: 07/23/2024 Page: 2 of 2

Case 21-19589-LMI Doc 169-2 Filed 08/27/24 Page 3 of 3
Richard W. HEAGNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2855

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Using a mechanistic model to develop management strategies to cool Apache Trout streams under the threat of climate change      

      September 13, 2019    

User‐friendly stream temperature models populated with on‐site data may help in developing strategies to manage temperatures of individual stream reaches that are subject to climate change. We used the field‐tested Stream Segment Temperature model (U.S. Geological Survey) to simulate how altering discharge, groundwater input, channel wetted width, and shade prevents the temperatures of White Mountain, Arizona, stream reaches from exceeding the thermal tolerance of Apache Trout Oncorhynchus apache, both under existing conditions and under a climate change scenario. Simulations suggested increasing shade, either through streamside planting of specific numbers and species of plants or by other means, would be most effective and feasible for cooling the stream reaches we studied. Ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa and Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii provided the most shade followed in order by Engelman spruce Picea engelmannii, Bebb's willow Salix bebbiana, Arizona alder Alnus oblongifolia, and finally coyote willow Salix exigua. Vegetation survival depends on the appropriateness of site conditions at present and under climate change, and planting in buffer strips minimizes additional water removal from the watershed through evapotranspiration. Alternative shading options, including thick sedge growth, shade cloth, or felled woody vegetation, may be considered when environmental conditions do not support plantings. Increasing groundwater input can cool streams, but additional sources are scarce in the region. Decreasing the width‐to‐depth ratio would succeed best on reaches with widths greater than 2.0 m. Increasing discharge from upstream may lower water temperature on reaches with an initial discharge greater than 0.5 m3/s. Existing models provide suggestions to cool stream reaches. Further development of accessible software packages that incorporate evaporation, fragmentation, and other projected climate change effects into their routines will provide additional tools to help manage climate change effects.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Scott Bonar, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

sbonar@usgs.gov

520-621-1193

## Related Content

#### Scott Bonar, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

sbonar@usgs.gov

520-621-1193

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - White Mountains
                  - Arizona

View All **
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 195 /Thursday, October 8, 1998 / Presidential Documents 54031

Presidential Determination No. 98–37 of September 29, 1998

Use of $10 Million in Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism,

Demining and Related Programs Account Funds and $5 Million in Economic Support Funds for a U.S. Contribution to

the Korean Peninsula Development Organization (KEDO)

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign

Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 2364(a)(1) (the ‘‘Act’’), I

hereby determine that it is important to the security interests of the United

States to furnish up to $10 million in funds made available under the

heading ‘‘Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs’’

in title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs

Appropriations Act, 1998 (Public Law 105–118), and $5 million in funds

made available under Chapter 4 of Part II of the Act for the U.S. contribution

to KEDO without regard to any provision of law within the scope of section

614(a)(1). I hereby authorize this contribution.

You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to

the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, September 29, 1998. [FR Docs. 98–27263

Filed 10–7–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
Ralph L. JAMES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30846

Summary Calendar

ROBERT O. KINCHEN JR

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RANDALL STOGNER

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:05-CV-944

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert O. Kinchen, Jr. moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) from the

district court’s dismissal of his civil complaint pursuant to FED. R. CIV.

P. 12(b)(6). In order to proceed IFP on appeal, Kinchen must show that he is a

pauper and that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Carson v. Polley,

689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Kinchen fails to show that he will present a

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. In his appellate brief, Kinchen fails to explain how

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-30846

2

the district erred in dismissing his lawsuit against Stogner. Id. Failure to

identify an error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if Kinchen had not

appealed the judgment. See Brinkman v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Kinchen’s brief is also void of any record

citations or legal argument. Id. Thus, Kinchen’s appeal is also subject to

dismissal for failure to comply with the rules requiring citations to the record

and relevant legal authority. See Moore v. FDIC, 993 F.2d 106, 107 (5th Cir.

1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a). Accordingly, Kinchen’s motion to proceed IFP on

appeal is DENIED and his appeal is DISMISSED. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117

F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40919]



[[Page 49305]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 216

[DFARS Case 96-D327]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; MILCON-
Environmental Restoration

Correction

    In rule document 97-381, appearing on page 1058, in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 8, 1997, make the following corrections:


216.306  [Corrected]

    On page 1058, in the second column, in 216.306, in paragraph 
(c)(i), in the fourth line, ``cost-plus fixed-fee'' should read ``cost-
plus-fixed-fee''.
    In the third column, in paragraph (c)(ii)(B), in the third line, 
``therefore'' should read ``therefor''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International
Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen Walters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Stephen Walters
-------------------
Stephen Walters
Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2009