alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 1 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 2 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 3 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 4 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 5 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 6 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 7 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 8 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 9 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 10 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 11 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 12 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 13 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 14 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 15 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 16 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 17 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 18 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 19 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 20 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 21 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 22 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 23 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 24 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 25 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 26 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 27 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 28 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 29 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 30 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 31 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 32 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 33 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 34 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 35 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 36 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 37 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 38 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 39 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 40 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 41 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 42 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 43 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 44 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 45 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 46 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 47 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 48 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 49 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 50 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 51 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 52 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 53 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 54 of 55
Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 1 Filed 11/05/21 Page 55 of 55
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual report of Knobias, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald A. Bernard,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                April 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Donald A. BernardDonald
                A. BernardChief
                Financial Officer
Joshua BOUIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-848

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Page 10b
RE: Question on NMED's BART report for SJGS
	Kuehn, Elizabeth, NMENV 
	to:
	Joe Kordzi
	10/13/2010 04:16 PM
	Show Details




Hi Joe, 
The baseline emissions were calculated using heat input, the controlled 
emission rate (lb/MMbtu) and assuming an annual unit capacity of 85 
percent.  We did want to present the level of control achieved by adding 
the consent decree technology so baseline prior to installing the CD 
technology was pre-CD emissions.  In Table 2, the baseline emissions for 
CD was pre-CD emissions and the controlled emission rate equaled to 4140 
tpy, with an emissions reduction equaling 1254 tpy.  
 
The baseline emissions for Unit 1 for all technologies beyond CD (ROFA, 
SCR, SNCR) was calculated by multiplying 0.30 lb/MMbtu times the heat 
input times 8760/2000 times 85%.
 
Unit 1 CD Scenario = 0.30 lb/MMbtu x 3707 MMbtu/hr x 8760/2000 x 85% = 
4140 tpy.  The same logic follows for Units 3, 4, and 5.  
 
Liz
 
Elizabeth Bisbey-Kuehn
Minor Source Section
Air Quality Bureau
1301 Siler, Building B
Santa Fe, NM  87507-3113
Phone: (505)476-4338 Fax:(505)476-4375
P   Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

From: Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 2:44 PM
To: Kuehn, Elizabeth, NMENV
Subject: Question on NMED's BART report for SJGS
 
Hi Liz, 

Can you pls tell me how the baseline emissions were calculated/assumed for 
the cases represented in Tables 2-5? 
http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/reghaz/documents/AppxA_NM_SJGS_NOxBARTDete
rmination_06212010.pdf

Regards,

Joe

" ... and miles to go before I sleep."
-- Robert Frost
 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited unless specifically provided under the New 
Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this 
message. -- This email has been scanned by the Sybari - Antigen Email 
System.
Exhibit
10.6


 


TERMINATION
OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


(Odyssey
Enterprises, LLC vs. International Western Petroleum)


 


THIS
TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 28th day of July 2017, by and between
Odyssey Enterprises, LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”) who had executed the consulting agreement
with International Western Petroleum, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on July 21, 2016.


 


W
I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS,
the Consultant owns 2,300,000 shares of common stock (the “Common Stock”) of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Consultant and the Company desire to terminate their agreement to remove its non-dilutable clause in Section 5 (the Compensation
section), and the Consultant remains its ownership of 2,300,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Shares”);


 


WHEREFORE,
the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
          Consulting Services. The Consultant has fulfilled
its consulting service obligation with the Company and will consider assisting the Company in its corporate development effort
in the future without any obligation. The parties hereto agree that the consulting agreement under which the services had been
provided is hereby terminated.


 


2.
          Release. The Consultant hereby releases the Company
from any and all claims, whether known or unknown, that the Consultant has or may have against the Company (except for all Terms
and Conditions outlined in the separate Marshall Walden Joint Venture Agreement executed between the Company and Consultant) as
of the date hereof. Additionally, for clarity, the anti-dilution (non-dilutable clause in Section 5 of the consulting agreement)
and additional share provisions of any agreements between the Company and the Consultant are hereby terminated.


 


3.
          Consideration. As consideration for the release
herein set forth, the Company will issue to the Consultant or its designees 200,000 shares of common stock, which shares shall
be restricted stock and bear an appropriate legend to that effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	 	INTERNATIONAL
    WESTERN PETROLEUM, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	       
	 	Name:
    	Benjamin
    Tran, Chairman


 


	 	ODYSSEY
    ENTERPRISES, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	      
	 	Printed
    Name: JOSEPH ROGERS, President
	 	Address:
    235 Apollo Beach, #248
	 	Apollo
    Beach, FL 33572
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.,****Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date: November 6, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr. |                                              |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                   |  Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.,         |
|                        |   |                                   |   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                             |        |                                        |                                                   |  |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Volcanism in the western San Juan Mountains, Colorado      

      December 1, 1966    

Three major cycles of volcanism during the Miocene and Pliocene formed a layered succession of calc-alkaline eruptive materials in the western San Juan Mountains nearly 1.5 miles thick and having a volume greater than 1,000 cubic miles. Each cycle was characterised by major eruptions followed by subsidence in the vent areas, and the resulting structure was a great volcanic plateau surrounding a complex of nested cauldrons. In the first cycle, cruption of several hundred cubic miles of tuff breccia and subordinate lavas was followed by subsidence that created the San Juan volcanic depression, about 15 miles wide and 30 miles long. During the second cycle, pyroclastic rocks and lava flows accumulated within this depression and on its borders, and the depression subsided further. During the third cycle, ash flows spead widely from centres within the depression, and their eruption resulted in formation and subsidence of the nearly circular comagmatic Silverton and Lake City cauldrons, each about 10 miles across, within the earlier depression. Cauldron subsidence in the second and third cycles was followed by resurgence and doming of the central blocks. Keystone grabens formed along the distended crests of the domed floors; graben faults formed in the third cycle were in part controlled by those formed in the second cycle. The distribution of post-cauldron radial and concentric fractures, dikes, and intrusive plutons, particularly around the Silverton cauldron, suggests that the underlying magma chamber must have been appreciably larger than the associated cauldrons. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - San Juan Mountains
                  - Colorado

View All **
Robert D. ABRAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1463

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Unusual leg malformations in screech owls from a South Carolina Superfund site      

      January 1, 2001    

In 1995, the discovery of leg malformations in several screech owl (Otis asio) nestlings and in their female parent at a Department of Energy (DOE) Superfund site in South Carolina prompted an investigation into the nature of the observed abnormalities. Surviving nestlings and the female parent were transferred to a captive screech owl breeding colony at the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. The malformed female parent and her offspring were each mated with normal owls from the colony for 3 yr. Matings of the malformed female produced five malformed and six normal owls; all owls produced by matings of normal offspring were normal. Malformed offspring were euthanized when it became apparent that their physical distress precluded survival under normal conditions of colony care. Euthanized owls were necropsied and examined for skeletal development. Detailed descriptions of eight malformed owls are presented. Results of the matings indicated that the leg malformations were caused by a genetic trait in the female parent that was heterozygous dominant. The characteristic was lethal except in occasional mild manifestations and resembled an extreme form of a dominant abnormality previously described for domestic fowl called duplicate polydactyly. Other reports of skeletal abnormalities in wild birds and potential environmental causes of genetic mutations at the DOE Superfund site are presented. Other studies performed at the DOE Superfund site do not implicate elevated (above background) ionizing radiation from 137Cs, the dominant radionuclide where the owls were captured, as the cause of the mutation. The cause of this genetic abnormality remains unknown.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - South Carolina

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

49976

Vol. 60, No. 187

Wednesday, September 27, 1995

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[AD–FRL–5272–1]

RIN 2060–AD–94

National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Petroleum

Refineries

Correction

In rule document 95–20252 beginning

on page 43244 in the issue of Friday,

August 18, 1995, make the following

correction:

§ 63.652 [Corrected]

On page 43276, in the second column,

in § 63.652(g)(4)(vi)(B), the equation

should read as follows:

EGLRic = × − 1 10 8 G

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Parts 10, 13 and 17

RIN 1018–AC57

Fish and Wildlife Service, General

Provisions and General Permit

Procedures

Correction

In proposed rule document 95–21862

beginning on page 46087 in the issue of

Tuesday, September 5, 1995, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 46087, in the third

column, under DATES, insert ‘‘or before’’

after ‘‘on’.

2. On page 46088, in the 1st column,

in the 1st full paragraph, in the 16th

line, ‘‘not’’ should read ‘‘now’’.

3. On page 46090, in the first column,

in the third full paragraph, in the first

line, ‘‘§ 13.21(b)’’ should read

‘‘§ 13.21(c)’’.

4. On the same page, in the 2d

column, in the 30th line, add an ‘‘s’’ to

‘‘evidence’’.

5. On page 46091, in the third

column, in the third full paragraph, in

the fourth line, ‘not’’ should read

‘‘now’’.

§ 13.30 [Corrected]

6. On page 46103, in the third

column, in § 13.30, in the table, in

paragraph (a), in the second column, in

the second line, remove the ‘‘1’’ after the

period; and remove the line under

paragraph (h).

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8600]

RIN 1545-AE86

Definition of an S Corporation

Correction

In rule document 95–17914 beginning

on page 37578 in the issue of Friday,

July 21, 1995, make the following

corrections:

§ 1.1361-1 [Corrected]

1. On page 37581, in the second

column, in § 1.1361-1, the heading

should read ‘‘§ 1.1361-1 S Corporation

defined.’’.

2. On page 37584, in the first column,

in § 1.1361-1(j)(2)(ii), in the fourth line,

‘‘requirements’’ was misspelled.

3. On the same page, in the 3rd

column, in § 1.1361-1(j)(4), in the 11th

line, ‘‘1361 (c)(2)(A)(i)’’ should read

‘‘1361(c)(2)(A)(i)’’.

4. On page 37587, in the second

column, in § 1.1361-1(k)(1), in Example

4(i), the heading should read ‘‘OSST

when terms do not require current

distribution of income.’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 17930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10410]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 69 /Friday, April 10, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 17930]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[AD-FRL-5978-4]
RIN 2060-AE02


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and 
Control Techniques Guideline Document for Source Categories: Aerospace 
Manufacturing and Rework Facilities

Correction

    In rule document 98-6999, beginning on page 15006, in the issue of 
Friday, March 27, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 63.744  [Corrected]

    On page 15018, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 7., 
in the ninth line, ``(6)'' should read ``(c)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release 34-39700; International Series Release No. 1122; File No. 600-
20]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Clearing 
Corporation; Notice of Filing of and Order Approving a Request for 
Extension of Temporary Registration as a Clearing Agency

Correction

    In notice document 98-5550 beginning on page 10669, in the issue of 
Wednesday, March 4, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 10670, in the first column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as set forth below.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(20)
              - (-)2023(7)
              - 2022(11)
              - 2021(6)
              - 2020(3)
              - 2019(3)

staff profileKaj Williams, Ph.D.

staff profileBryan A. Killingsworth, Ph.D.

staff profilePatrick Wurster

staff profileMartha A Scholl

science explorer topicCarbon Emissions and Sequestration

staff profileKimberly Casey, Ph.D.

science explorer topicRemote Sensing
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(6)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - (-)tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bradford Miller, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BGR Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash
     flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures for the issuer and have:

     (i)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the issuer is made known to me,
          particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
          prepared;
     (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
          procedures as of June 30, 2004; and
     (iii)Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
          disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
          Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the issuer's
     auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons
     fulfilling the equivalent function):

     (i)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the issuer's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
          the issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls
          (none were so noted); and
     (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal
          controls (none were so noted); and

6.   I have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant
     changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
     affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
     evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 25, 2004

/s/ Bradford Miller
--------------------------
Bradford Miller
President
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2015 - 1981 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM204AD

MESS IER - DOW TY

A33/34 - 32 - 285, R5 --- 8/14/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008