alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 54242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21269]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

 Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 September 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing CFAStaff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: August 23, 2013, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
 Secretary, AIA.
[FR Doc. 2013-21269 Filed 8-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
Oscar VELAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2781

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 17958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40423]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 94-81]


Shahid Musud Siddiqui, M.D.; Revocation of Registration

Correction

    In notice document 96-8043 beginning on page 14818 in the issue of 
Wednesday, April 3, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 14818, in the second column, in the first paragraph, the 
last line should read ``42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(a)''. In the same column, 
third paragraph, in the second line ``field'' should read ``filed''. 
And on the same page, in the third column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the sixth line ``deputy'' should read ``Deputy''.
    2. On page 14819, in the first column, in the ninth line ``Kir'' 
should read ``Kirk''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(14)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - (-)montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - utah(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        February 26, 2024        USGS provides easy access to Colorado River science with new online portal
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate as to Compliance for the Washington Mutual
               MSC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-MS12 dated as
               of March 22, 2002


                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

         The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
formerly PNC Mortgage Securities Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
hereby certifies on behalf of the Company and on his own behalf for purposes of
the Washington Mutual MSC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2001-MS12,
as follows:

         1.    I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting Vice President of
               the Company.

         2.    Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the
               meanings ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing
               Agreement related to the above-referenced series of Certificates.

         3.    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
               Certificate on behalf of the Company.

         4.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
               preceding calendar year and performance under this Agreement has
               been made under my supervision.

         5.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
               Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
               throughout such year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 22, 2002.


                                    By:  /s/ Richie Moore
                                         ----------------------
                                         Richie Moore
                                          Vice President
Alvin MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-756

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
                Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alamosa
                (Delaware), Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
                as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
                "Report"), I, Kendall Cowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
                certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) | The
                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                         the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Kendall
                                CowanName:Title:Date:
                         
                         Kendall Cowan Chief Financial
                                Officer May 15, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
                Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
                been provided to Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. and will be retained by Alamosa
                (Delaware), Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
                staff upon request.
Nestor Rivera ROJAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1116

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Yuniel Mejias GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Claudia Marin BAEZ, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2167

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 11, 2018

Yuniel Mejias Gonzalez, in proper person.

Claudia Marin Baez, in proper person.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LUCK, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The appellant, Yuniel Mejias Gonzalez, seeks review of the permanent domestic violence injunction entered against him by the trial court. We affirm.

Under Florida law, "[a] trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court's decision." *Carricarte v. Carricarte*, 961 So.2d 1019, 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (quoting *Jackson v. Echols*, 937 So.2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ). The abuse of discretion standard applies to instances in which the trial court's ruling on a request for a permanent injunction rests upon questions of fact. *Carricarte*, 961 So.2d at 1020. "This is particularly true where the order relies on live testimony or other evidence that the trial court is singularly well-suited to evaluate." *Id.* (citation omitted).

At the hearing in this case, the appellee testified to the incidents set forth in her petition for injunction. The appellee's aunt, who was present when the incidents occurred, testified and corroborated the appellee's testimony. The trial court also heard testimony from the appellant. The trial court expressly found the appellee and her aunt to be credible and found the appellant not credible. The trial court was well-suited to evaluate the testimony and, contrary to appellant's argument on appeal, nothing in the record demonstrates an abuse of discretion.

The appellant also argues that the appellee testified as to incidents that were not listed in her petition for permanent injunction and relies upon *Sanchez v. Marin*, 138 So.3d 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) and *De Leon v. Collazo*, 178 So.3d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) as bases for reversal. However, in both *Sanchez* and *De Leon*, the party against whom the injunction was sought objected to the testimony relating to incidents that were not set forth in the petition. Here, appellant failed to object to the allegedly improper testimony, and his counsel extensively cross-examined the appellee as to her testimony. *See**Faddis v. Luddy*, 221 So.3d 758, 759-60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (concluding that by not objecting below, the appellant failed to preserve his argument that the trial court denied him due process by considering testimony regarding prior incidents not alleged in the petition). *Sanchez* and *De Leon* are therefore distinguishable and inapplicable.

Affirmed.
Donald Wayne FLANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1233

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Eddie POWELL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3041

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James L. MAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.

Belated appeal is denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Wildfire hazards—A national threat      

      January 1, 2006    

View Report

Wildfires are a growing natural hazard in most regions of the United States, posing a threat to life and property, particularly where native ecosystems meet developed areas.

However, because fire is a natural (and often beneficial) process, fire suppression can lead to more severe fires due to the buildup of vegetation, which creates more fuel.

In addition, the secondary effects of wildfires, including erosion, landslides, introduction of invasive species, and changes in water quality, are often more disastrous than the fire itself.

## Citation Information
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7268

MICHAEL P. GRAFMULLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH WEGNER, Director, Air Force Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00050-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael P. Grafmuller, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Grafmuller appeals the district court’s orders 

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion to vacate his prior 

criminal convictions by a general court martial and denying his 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider. The Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure do not provide a vehicle by which Grafmuller 

may challenge his criminal judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, 81; 

United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1998) 

(per curiam) (“Rule 60(b) simply does not provide relief from 

judgment in a criminal case.”). We therefore affirm the 

district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

4218 

Vol. 71, No. 16 

Wednesday, January 25, 2006 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[UT–921–1430–ET; UTU 042887] 

Public Land Order No. 7650; 

Revocation of Public Land Order No. 

852; Utah 

Correction 

In notice document E5–7485 

appearing on page 75218 in the issue of 

Monday, December 19, 2005, make the 

following correction: 

On page 75218, in the third column, 

in the EFFECTIVE DATE heading, ‘‘January 

18, 2005’’ should read ‘‘January 18, 

2006’’. 

[FR Doc. Z5–7485 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with FRCX
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 61 (Friday, March 28, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Pages 16747-16749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-3390]



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 61 / Friday, March 28, 2008 / 
Corrections

[[Page 16747]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 25

[FAC 2005-24; FAR Case 2007-016; Item III; Docket 2008-0001; Sequence 
3]
RIN 900-AK89


Federal Acquistion Regulation; FAR Case 2007-016, Trade 
Agreements-New Thresholds

Correction

    In rule document E8-3390 beginning on page 10962 in the issue of 
Thursday, February 28, 2008, make the following correction:


25.402  [Corrected]

    On page 10963, under 25.402(b), the table is corrected to read as 
set forth below:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Supply          Service      Construction
                                                                     contract        contract        contract
                         Trade Agreement                           (equal to or    (equal to or    (equal to or
                                                                    exceeding)      exceeding)      exceeding)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WTO GPA FTAs....................................................        $194,000        $194,000      $7,443,000
Australia FTA...................................................          67,826          67,826       7,443,000
Bahrain FTA.....................................................         194,000         194,000       8,817,449
CAFTA-DR (El Salvador, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras,           67,826          67,826       7,443,000
 and Nicaragua).................................................
Chile FTA.......................................................          67,826          67,826       7,443,000
Morocco FTA.....................................................         194,000         194,000       7,443,000
NAFTA:
    --Canada....................................................          25,000          67,826       8,817,449
    --Mexico....................................................          67,826          67,826       8,817,449
Singapore FTA...................................................          67,826          67,826       7,443,000
Israeli Trade Act...............................................          50,000  ..............  ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. Z8-3390 Filed 3-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration


Correction In notice document E9-18474, beginning on page 38397, in the issue of Monday, August 3, 2009, make the following correction: On page 38398, at the end of the chart, in the section that reads “Countervailing Duty Proceedings,”, the table is corrected to read as follows: Period**Countervailing Duty Proceedings**Republic of Korea:Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Plate C-580-818
1/1/08—12/31/08Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors C-580-851
1/1/08—8/10/08Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils C-580-835
1/1/08—12/31/08The People's Republic of China:Laminated Woven Sacks C-570-917
12/3/07—12/31/08Sodium Nitrite C-570-926
4/11/08—12/31/08Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube C-570-915
11/30/07—12/31/08


[FR Doc. Z9-18474 Filed 8-13-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of OmniaLuo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zheng Luo, Chief
      Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Zheng Luo*Zheng
                Luo*
              *President
                & Chief Executive Officer*March
                31,
                2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      OmniaLuo, Inc. and will be retained by OmniaLuo, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Arthur S.
Locke III, Chief Financial Officer of Websense, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Websense, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Websense, Inc. for the
period covered by the Quarterly Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ ARTHUR S. LOCKE III                    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Arthur S. Locke III Chief
Financial Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Websense, Inc. and will be retained by Websense, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Quarterly Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------