alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herbst Gaming,Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Edward J. Herbst, as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Edward J. Herbst                             |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Edward J. Herbst                                 |
|   | Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer and President |
|   | April 2, 2007                                    |

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herbst Gaming,Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), MaryE. Higgins, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Mary E. Higgins     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Mary E. Higgins         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | April 2, 2007           |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

----
IB 

Union Calendar No. 485 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5160 

[Report No. 114–626] 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include as part of the buildings 

and grounds of the National Gallery of Art any buildings and other 

areas within the boundaries of any real estate or other property interests 

acquired by the National Gallery of Art. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2016 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

JUNE 16, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5160 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include as part 

of the buildings and grounds of the National Gallery 

of Art any buildings and other areas within the boundaries of any real estate or other property interests acquired by the National Gallery of Art. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5160 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER AREAS 

4 WITHIN BOUNDARIES OF REAL ESTATE OR 

5 OTHER PROPERTY INTERESTS ACQUIRED BY 

6 NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART. 

7 Section 6301(2) of title 40, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

10 by striking ‘‘The National Gallery of Art’’ and in11 serting ‘‘(A) The National Gallery of Art’’; 

12 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

13 and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; 

14 and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(B) All other buildings, service roads, walks, 

18 and other areas within the exterior boundaries of 

19 any real estate or land or interest in land (including 

20 temporary use) that the National Gallery of Art ac21 quires and that the Director of the National Gallery 

22 of Art determines to be necessary for the adequate 

23 protection of individuals or property in the National 

24 Gallery of Art and suitable for administration as a 

25 part of the National Gallery of Art.’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 485 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5160 

[Report No. 114–626] 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to include 

Gallery of Art. other property interests acquired by the National areas within the boundaries of any real estate or tional Gallery of Art any buildings and other as part of the buildings and grounds of the NaJUNE 16, 2016 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of E and S Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Edward A. Barth,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Director of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
          (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                          By: /s/ Edward A. Barth
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Edward A. Barth

Dated: August 25, 2005
      ----------------
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>ims20062ceo906ex32-1.txt
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Monetary Systems,
Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Donald M. Mardak,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Donald M. Mardak
    -----------------------
    Donald M. Mardak
    Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Survey for bright Mars-crossing asteroids      

      December 1, 1981    

View Document

A new method of search for relatively bright Mars-crossing asteroids with the Palomar 46-cm Schmidt camera was initiated in 1980. Selected fields photographed with the 46-cm Schmidt were systematically reduced for all asteroids detected on the films. The 46-cm Schmidt fields have an effective diameter of 8 3/4 degrees. Kodak 11a-D film was exposed with a yellow plexiglass filter. The films were scanned with a specially designed stereomicroscope that permits recognition of asteroids by stereopsis. Stereoscopic pairs of films were exposed with a time separation of 30 minutes; over this interval the parallax in position relative to the background stars allows easy recognition of asteroids at distances ranging from near the Earth through the main belt. Optimum exposure for each film was found to be 10 minutes on the f/2 Schmidt.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Teresa Decaria Case No. 21-11494-SMG

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 3,500.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 500.00

Balance Due $ 3,000.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

February 22, 2021 /s/ Efrain Cortes

Date Efrain Cortes 0885649

Signature of Attorney

Law Office of Efrain Cortes

PO Box 590173

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33359

954-4865722 Fax: 954-765-6345

Efrain@ecglawyer.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-11494-SMG Doc 10 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 1
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Unipharma, LLC Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 11

CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT (RULE 7007.1)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7007.1 and to enable the Judges to evaluate possible disqualification or

recusal, the undersigned counsel for Unipharma, LLC in the above captioned action, certifies that the following is a

(are) corporation(s), other than the debtor or a governmental unit, that directly or indirectly own(s) 10% or more of any

class of the corporation's(s') equity interests, or states that there are no entities to report under FRBP 7007.1:

NHTV (AIV) Ulm Holdings LLC

c/o MS Capital Partners Adviser Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, NY 10036

Raimundo Esteban Santamarta

Calle Bernadette y Los Laboratorios

Torre SM - Los Cortijos de Lourdes

Caracas-1070

Venezuela

Raimundo Jose Santamarta

1500 Island Boulevard

Aventura, FL 33160

Reinaldo Santamarta

14601 Jockey Circle North

Davie, FL 33330

 None [Check if applicable]

December 7, 2020 /s/ Paul Steven Singerman

Date Paul Steven Singerman 378860

Signature of Attorney or Litigant

Counsel for Unipharma, LLC

Berger Singerman LLP

1450 Brickell Avenue

Suite 1900

Miami, FL 33131

305-755-9500 Fax:305-714-4340

singerman@bergersingerman.com

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-23348-PDR Doc 4 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 143 (Thursday, July 24, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-15185]



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 43287]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental 
Impact Statement (PEIS) for the Brigade Combat Team Transformation at 
Fort Irwin, CA

Correction

    In notice document E8-15185 appearing on page 38999 in the issue of 
Tuesday, July 8, 2008, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 38999, in the second column, under the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT heading, in the second line, ``Muhammad Ban'' 
should read ``Muhammad Bari''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, under the same heading, in 
the fourth line, ``<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7538001d14181814115b17141b3500065b1407180c5b181c19"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="410c3429202c2c20256f23202f0134326f20332c386f2c282d">[email protected]</span></a>.'' should read 
``<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b162e333a36363a3f75393a29321b2e28753a29362275363237"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8b58d90999595999cd69a998a91b88d8bd6998a9581d6959194">[email protected]</span></a>.''.

[FR Doc. Z8-15185 Filed 7-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Opinion of the Court

_________________

_________________ 1 Cite as: 589 U. S. ____ (2019)

Statement of S OTOMAYOR , J. 

## SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 19–6477 (19A482)

CHARLES RUSSELL RHINES v. DARIN YOUNG, WARDEN
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT [November 4, 2019] The application for stay of ex ecution of sentence of death presented to J USTICE G ORSUCH and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is de

nied. Statement of J USTICE S OTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari. In 1993, a South Dakota jury sentenced petitioner Charles Rhines to death for murdering his co-worker. In order to assist them in prep aring a state clemency applica

tion, Rhines’ federal habeas a ttorneys retained medical ex

perts to evaluate Rhines. State officials, as well as a state court, refused to grant the experts access to Rhines in prison. The Federal District Court below also denied Rhines’ request for access. It reasoned, among other things, that the federal public defender statute, 18 U. S. C. §3599, did not give it authority to “s upervise or control a state’s clemency process” and that South Dakota did not violate Rhines’ due process rights by denying his experts access to the prison. 2018 WL 2390130, *9 (D SD, May 25, 2018). The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit did not ad

dress the bulk of Rhines’ contentions. It instead dismissed the appeal, concluding that the expert-access issue was “ei

ther moot, or . . . not . . . fully exhausted.” 2019 WL 5485274, *1 (Oct. 25, 2019). In essence, because Rhines’Opinion of the Court 2 RHINES v. YOUNG

Statement of S OTOMAYOR , J. execution was imminent and his clemency application pending before the Governor of South Dakota, the court found that Rhines should have previously asked the Gover

nor to allow his experts access to the prison—or that he could still do so. Ibid. The Eighth Circuit reached that con

clusion even though the anticipated expert report was, in Rhines’ view, an important predicate for the clemency ap

plication itself. It is unclear from this record whether an expert evalua

tion is necessary to Rhines’ cl emency application. Although Rhines’ experts believed there were additional grounds for investigation—including traumatic events that Rhines suf

fered earlier in his life—Rhines, as the State notes, has al

ready been evaluated by several psychiatric experts in a dif

ferent context. For that reas on, I do not dissent from the denial of certiorari. I write separately, however, to note that this Court’s denial of certiorari does not represent an endorsement of the lower courts’ opinions. I also write sep

arately to emphasize that clemency is not “a matter of mercy alone,” but rather is the “ ‘fail safe’ in our criminal justice system.” Harbison v. Bell , 556 U. S. 180, 192 (2009) (quoting Herrera v. Collins , 506 U. S. 390, 415 (1993)). By closing the prison doors in this context, a State risks ren

dering this fundamental process an empty ritual.
Russell A. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael A. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-382

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 58979)    

### Correction

In notice document E8-21742 appearing on page 54170 in the issue of Thursday, September 18, 2008, make the following corrections:

In the second column, in the first full paragraph, the 12th and 13th lines are corrected to read as follows: “Siemens AG, Karlsruhe, GERMANY; and ABB Automation Productions GmbH, Alzenau, GERMANY.”

[FR Doc. Z8-21742 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 8.1



Trend Micro Subsidiaries



|    |  |                                        
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------
|1.  |  | Trend Micro Incorporated               
|    | 
|    |  | (Taiwan)                               
|    | 
|2.  |  | Trend Micro Inc.                       
|    | 
|    |  | (U.S.A.)                               
|    | 
|3.  |  | Trend Micro Korea Inc.                 
|    | 
|    |  | (South Korea)                          
|    | 
|4.  |  | Trend Micro Italy S.r.l.               
|    | 
|    |  | (Italy)                                
|    | 
|5.  |  | Trend Micro Deutschland Gmbh           
|    | 
|    |  | (Germany)                              
|    | 
|6.  |  | Trend Micro Australia Pty. Ltd.        
|    | 
|    |  | (Australia)                            
|    | 
|7.  |  | Trend Micro do Brasil Ltda.            
|    | 
|    |  | (Brazil)                               
|    | 
|8.  |  | Trend Micro France                     
|    | 
|    |  | (France)                               
|    | 
|9.  |  | Trend Micro Hong Kong Limited          
|    | 
|    |  | (China)                                
|    | 
|10. |  | Trend Micro Latinoamerica S.A.de C.V.  
|    | 
|    |  | (Mexico)                               
|    | 
|11. |  | Trend Micro (UK) Limited               
|    | 
|    |  | (United Kingdom)                       
|    | 
|12. |  | Trend Micro (China) Incorporated       
|    | 
|    |  | (China)                                
|    | 
|13. |  | Trend Micro TMLA S.A.de C.V.           
|    | 
|    |  | (Mexico)                               
|    | 
|14. |  | Trend Micro (EMEA) Limited             
|    | 
|    |  | (Ireland)                              
|    | 
|15. |  | Trend Micro (Singapore) Private Limited
|    | 
|    |  | (Singapore)                            
|    | 
|16. |  | Trend Micro (NZ) Limited               
|    | 
|    |  | (New Zealand)                          
|    | 
|17. |  | ipTrend Incorporated                   
|    | 
|    |  | (Taiwan)                               
|    | 
|18. |  | Trend Micro Incorporated Sdn.Bhd       
|    | 
|    |  | (Malaysia)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

Case No. 19-10655-BKC-SMG

CONSUMER ADVOCACY CENTER, INC.

Chapter 7

 Debtor.

______________________________________/

SONYA SALKIN SLOTT,

 Chapter 7 Trustee ADV. NO. 21-01015-SMG

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL MERCHANT CENTER, INC.

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Sonya S. Slott, as Chapter 7 Trustee for Consumer Advocacy Center, Inc. hereby

voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the within action against Defendant, National Merchant 

Center, Inc.,pursuant to a Court Order approving the settlement agreement between the parties 

dated June 11, 2021[Main Case ECF No. 314] with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees 

and costs.

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of August, 2021.

GENOVESE JOBLOVE & BATTISTA, P.A.

Counsel to Trustee

100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 4400

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 349-2300

Facsimile: (305) 349-2310

By: /s/ Gregory Garno, 

 Gregory M. Garno, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 087505

ggarno@gjb-law.com

Case 21-01015-SMG Doc 27 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via the 

Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing System upon all interested creditors and parties 

registered to receive electronic notification on this matter (which is incorporated herein by 

reference) on August 16, 2021.

/s/ Gregory Garno 

Gregory M. Garno, Esq.

Case 21-01015-SMG Doc 27 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Trevor
      Drinkwater, Chief Executive Officer of Genius Products, Inc. (the “Registrant”),
      do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
      United States Code that:




(1)
      the
      Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period
      ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), to which this statement is filed as an
      exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                August 13, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                Trevor DrinkwaterTrevor
                Drinkwater
              Chief
                Executive Officer