alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Wildfire as a catalyst for hydrologic and geomorphic change      

      April 24, 2019    

Wildfire has been a constant presence on the Earth since at least the Silurian period, and is a landscape-scale catalyst that results in a step-change perturbation for hydrologic systems, which ripples across burned terrain, shaping the geomorphic legacy of watersheds. Specifically, wildfire alters two key landscape properties: (1) overland flow, and (2) soil erodibility. Overland flow and soil erodibility have both been seen to increase after wildfires, resulting in order-of-magnitude increases in erosion rates during rainstorms with relatively frequent recurrence intervals. On short timescales, wildfire increases erosion and leads to natural hazards that are costly and threatening to society. Over longer timescales, wildfire-induced erosion can account for the majority of total denudation in certain settings with long- term implications for landscape evolution. There is a special focus on debris flows in this document because they are the most destructive geomorphic process that is observed to follow wildfires after high severity burns. In the past several decades researchers have investigated important aspects of post-wildfire debris flows, such as: the provenance of sediment that is moved in debris flows, the hydrologic and soil properties required to produce debris flows, and debris flow initiation mechanisms. Herein we highlight the relevant research articles showing the current state of progress in debris flow research as well as pointing to the fundamental research on post-wildfire hydrology and erosion that is necessary for understanding how water and sediment behave after wildfires.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Francis Rengers

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

frengers@usgs.gov

303-273-8637

## Related Content

#### Francis Rengers

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

frengers@usgs.gov

303-273-8637

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Summary of floods in the United States, January 1992 through September 1993      

      January 1, 1998    

View Document

This volume contains a summary of the flooding in the upper Mississippi River Basin during the spring and summer of 1993 and 36 articles describing severe, widespread, or unusual flooding in the United States from January 1, 1992, to the end of the 1993 water year, September 30, 1993. Each flood is described to an extent commensurate with its significance and the availability of data on the hydrology and the damages. Each article includes one or more maps showing the general area of flooding and the sites for which data are presented. Most articles include tables of data that allow the reader to compare the described flood with past floods at selected flood-determination sites. The articles generally do not attempt to analyze the floods or draw definitive conclusions, except for a few cases in which the author had sufficient information for an analysis to be made.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

#### Dakota Water Science Center- Rapid City

1608 Mountain ViewRapid City, SD57702United States

(605) 394-3200

(605) 355-4523

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Towards reproducible environmental modeling for decision support: A worked example      

      February 28, 2020    

A fully worked example of decision-support-scale uncertainty quantification (UQ) and parameter estimation (PE) is presented. The analyses are implemented for an existing groundwater flow model of the Edwards aquifer, Texas, USA, and are completed in a script-based workflow that strives to be transparent and reproducible. High-dimensional PE is used to history-match simulated outputs to corresponding state observations of spring flow and groundwater level. Then a hindcast of a historical drought is made. Using available state observations recorded during drought conditions, the combined UQ and PE analyses are shown to yield an ensemble of model results that bracket the observed hydrologic responses. All files and scripts used for the analyses are placed in the public domain to serve as a template for other practitioners who are interested in undertaking these types of analyses.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

June 1, 2021

####                 Towards reproducible environmental modeling for decision support: a worked example              

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

#### Linzy Foster

##### Public Information Officer

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

lfoster@usgs.gov

512-367-0932

#### Michael N Fienen

##### Research Hydrologist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

mnfienen@usgs.gov

608-821-3894

## Related Content

June 1, 2021

####                 Towards reproducible environmental modeling for decision support: a worked example              

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

#### Linzy Foster

##### Public Information Officer

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

lfoster@usgs.gov

512-367-0932

#### Michael N Fienen

##### Research Hydrologist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

mnfienen@usgs.gov

608-821-3894

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center – Austin, TX Office

1505 Ferguson LaneAustin, TX78754United States

(512) 927-3500

(512) 927-3590 

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - southern-central Texas
                  - texas

View All **
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.GG


                          COGEN TECHNOLOGIES NJ VENTURE
                                  10 HOOK ROAD
                            BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY 07002

December 17, 2001

El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Attention:  Vice President

By Facsimile:  (713) 420-6365


Reference is made to the Bayonne Power Purchase/Sale Transaction Confirmation
dated as of October 1, 2001 by and between El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. (Buyer)
and Cogen Technologies NJ Venture (Seller) (the "Bayonne Transaction
Confirmation"). In consideration of Buyer's agreement to pay Seller
$4,711,994.00, notice is hereby given pursuant to the Section entitled
"Termination" in the Bayonne Transaction Confirmation of Seller's intent to
terminate the Bayonne Transaction Confirmation effective midnight December 31,
2003.

Please promptly confirm your receipt and acceptance of this notice Seller by
executing your acknowledgement below and sending a copy of this notice to Seller
at the address provided for in the Bayonne Transaction Confirmation.

COGEN TECHNOLOGIES NJ VENTURE


By: /s/ John L. Harrison
   --------------------------------------
Name:  John L. Harrison
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
       Financial Officer


ACKNOWLEDGED:

EL PASO MERCHANT ENERGY, L.P.


By: /s/ John L. Harrison
   --------------------------------------
Name:  John L. Harrison
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
       Financial Officer
Phillip S. WRIGHT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-430

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 11, 2018]

Phillip S. Wright, Jr., Bushnell, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b). Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court to seek a ruling on his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which has been pending below since January 7, 2016.

May, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           What can we learn from the Wells, NV earthquake sequence about seismic hazard in the intermountain west?      

      October 28, 2008    

The February 21, 2008 Wells, NV earthquake (M 6) was felt throughout eastern Nevada, southern Idaho, and western Utah. The town of Wells sustained significant damage to unreinforced masonry buildings. The earthquake occurred in a region of low seismic hazard with little seismicity, low geodetic strain rates, and few mapped faults. The peak horizontal ground acceleration predicted by the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps is about 0.2 g at 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years, with the contributions coming mostly from the Ruby Mountain fault and background seismicity (M5-7.0). The hazard model predicts that the probability of occurrence of an M>6 event within 50 km of Wells is about 15% in 100 years. Although the earthquake was inside the USArray Transportable Array network, the nearest on-scale recordings of ground motions from the mainshock were too distant to estimate accelerations in town. The University of Nevada Reno, the University of Utah, and the U.S. Geological Survey deployed portable instruments to capture the ground motions from aftershocks of this rare normal-faulting event. Shaking from a M 4.7 aftershock recorded on portable instruments at distances less than 10 km exceeded 0.3 g, and sustained accelerations above 0.1 g lasted for about 5 seconds. For a magnitude 5 earthquake at 10 km distance the NGA equations predict median peak ground accelerations about 0.1 g. Ground motions from normal faulting earthquakes are poorly represented in the ground motion prediction equations. We compare portable and Transportable Array ground-motion recordings with prediction equations. Advanced National Seismic System stations in Utah recorded ground motions 250 km from the mainshock of about 2% g. The maximum ground motion recorded in Salt Lake City was in the center of the basin. We analyze the spatial variability of ground motions (rock vs. soil) and the influence of the Salt Lake Basin in modifying the ground motions. We then compare this data with the September 28, 2004 Parkfield aftershocks to contrast the differences between strike-slip and normal ground motions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

27625

Vol. 63, No. 96

Tuesday, May 19, 1998

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 101

[CC Docket No. 92-297; FCC 98-77]

Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint

Distribution Service and for Fixed

Satellite Services

Correction

In rule document 98–12667 beginning

on page 26502, in the issue of

Wednesday, May 13, 1998, make the

following correction:

Appearing on page 26502, in the

second column, the EFFECTIVE DATE:

should be corrected to read ‘‘July 13,

1998.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Tamarac 10200, LLC Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 11

LIST OF EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS

Following is the list of the Debtor's equity security holders which is prepared in accordance with rule 1007(a)(3) for filing in this Chapter 11 Case

Name and last known address or place of

business of holder

Security Class Number of Securities Kind of Interest

International Supply Group Corp.

1430 S. Dixie Highway, Ste. 321

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Membership

Units

100 Equity

Raimundo Jose Santamarta

1500 Island Boulevard

Aventura, FL 33160

Membership

Units

900 Equity

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY ON BEHALF OF CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP

I, the Chief Restructuring Officer of the corporation named as the debtor in this case, declare under penalty of

perjury that I have read the foregoing List of Equity Security Holders and that it is true and correct to the best of my

information and belief.

Date December 7, 2020 Signature /s/ Neil F. Luria

Neil F. Luria

Penalty for making a false statement of concealing property: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years or both.

 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 and 3571.

Sheet 1 of 1 in List of Equity Security Holders

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-23346-PDR Doc 5 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediaNet Group Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael B. Hansen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





/s/ Michael B. HansenMichael B. HansenPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





March 30, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
19736 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 76 / Thursday, April 20, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–9776 Filed 4–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
RE: Comments received on the EPA's proposed approval of the NH RH SIP Martone, Charles H to: Anne McWilliams 06/26/2012 10:09 AM Cc: Anne Arnold, "Hoffman, Barbara", "Underhill, Jeff' From : "Martone, Charles H" <CharIes .Martone@des .nh.gov> To: Anne McWilliams/R1/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Anne Arnold/R1/USEPA/US@EPA, Hoffman, Barbara" <Barbara .Hoffman@des .nh.yov>,

"Underhill, Jeff' <Jeffrey .Underhill @des .nh.gov> ry: 2 attachments This message has been replied to
.

6-2012 Revised BART Modeling Results - V2.doc CALPUFF S04BGG.LST


### Anne, As requested, NHDES revisited the BART modeling calculations with the conditions specified by the NPS in their comments
. The first attachment, a tabulation of the BART modeling results, reflects your phone conversation with Jeff Underhill following your May 8 email request
. The second attachment contains the results of the revised calculations and a sample CALPUFF (CALPOST) output file
. Please note that NPS wanted the maximumpossible BART unit impact occurring at the same time as the theoretical 20% best conditions are occurring
. To do this with a southwest wind means all sources along the corridor would be turned off with only our source operating and providing a direct hit
. It would also have to happen when biogenic sources are in dormancy
. Jeff is your best contact for any technical questions related to the modeling analysis
. Charlie Charles H

. Martone, SIP Analyst New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 phone: 603-271-1089 fax: 603-271-7053 email : charles .martone@des .nh.gov 

### -----Original Message----- From : Anne McWilliams [mailto:mcwilliams .anne@epamail .epa.gov] Sent : Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12:09 PM 

### To: Martone, Charles H; Underhill, Jeff Subject : Comments received on the EPA's proposed approval of the NH RH SIP Hi, Attached are comments we received on the proposed approval of the NewHampshire Regional Haze SIP
.

### (See attached file: NH BART NPS Comments 4-26-12 Letter .pdf)(See attached file:

Sierra Club NH Haze SIP approval comments[1] .pdf) I will need some additional BART modeling data (highest impact) for our response to comments
. Thanks! Anne Anne McWilliams Air Quality Planning EPA - New

England Tel : 617 918-1697 Fax: 617 918-0697 ""'' New

Mailing Address After December 14, 2009"""" EPA Region 1 Five Post Office Square - Suite 100 Mail Code - OEP05-02 Boston, MA 02109-3912
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

      ( print page 72508)    

### Correction

In notice document E5-6606 appearing on page 71560 in the issue of Tuesday, November 29, 2005, make the following correction:

On page 71560, in the first column, the fourth paragraph from the top, beginning with “One comment....” it should read “One comment was received; however, because it was filed after the expiration of the 30-day notice and comment period it was not considered.”

[FR Doc. Z5-6606 Filed 12-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Robert S. Corrigan, Chief Executive Officer of AcuNetx, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AcuNetx, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

DATE: August 14, 2008
                                /s/ Robert S. Corrigan
                                ----------------------
                                    Robert S. Corrigan, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

      ( print page 34363)    

### Correction

In notice document E8-11953 beginning on page 30904 in the issue of Thursday, May 29, 2008 make the following correction:

On page 30906, in the third column, in the last line “which” should read “which considers both income and assets.”.

[FR Doc. Z8-11953 Filed 6-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 21-10421-RAM Doc 13 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-10421-RAM Doc 13 Filed 01/21/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-10421-RAM Doc 13 Filed 01/21/21 Page 3 of 3
SARASOTA COMMONS, LTD., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0151

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Withhold formal issuance of the writ.