alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Christopher Nimeth Case No. 21-16573-LMI

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DECLARATION REGARDING PAYMENT ADVICES

Debtor:

 Copies of all payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the debtor from any employer within 60

days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior,

attach copies of any and all received and provide explanation that you didn't work the full 60 days.

)

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor had no income from any employer during the 60 days

prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor:

 receives disability payments

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation

 receives Social Security payments

 receives a pension

 does not work outside the home

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the debtor is unable to timely provide some or all copies of payment advices or

other evidence of payment received

Explain: 

Joint Debtor (if applicable):

 Copies of payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the joint debtor from any employer within 60

days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior,

attach copies of any and all received and provide explanation that you didn't work the full 60 days.

)

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor had no income from any employer during the 60 days

prior to filing the bankruptcy petition.

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor:

 receives disability payments

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation

 receives Social Security payments

 receives a pension

 does not work outside the home

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the joint debtor is unable to timely provide some or all copies of payment

advices or other evidence of payment received

Explain: 

LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 1 of 2

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-16573-LMI Doc 21 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 2
NOTE: When submitting copies of evidence of payment such as pay stubs or payment advices, it is your responsibility to redact

(blackout) any social security numbers, names of minor children, dates of birth or financial account numbers before attaching for

filing with the court. See Local Rule 5005-1(A)(2).

/s/ Christopher Nimeth Date: August 12, 2021

Christopher Nimeth

Signature of Attorney or Debtor

LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 2 of 2

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2021 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-16573-LMI Doc 21 Filed 08/12/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                       656
<INVENTORY>                                     10,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,926
<PP&E>                                         111,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 427,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,566
<BONDS>                                        578,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (504,111)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   427,692
<SALES>                                        284,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,574
<CGS>                                          119,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (116,214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (116,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  63,966
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,437)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Relations among surficial materials, light intensity, and sycamore-seed germination along the Potomac River near Washington, D.C.      

      November 1, 1976    

View Document

 Seed of sycamore, a common tree on river flood plains, germinate in mineral soil exposed to high light intensities. Germination rates are low on surfaces covered with leaf litter, and seedlings die when shaded by closely spaced herbaceous plants. All germination rates were higher when seed were kept moist. Surflcial materials and light values in this study are similar to those on flood plains. Results were derived from counting seedlings after planting 1,000 seeds in each of several flats filled with different kinds of flood-plain and upland soils.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Potomac River
                  - District of Columbia
                  -  Virginia

View All **
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40709

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ernesto Ruiz-Bedolla,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:21-CR-309-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto RuizBedolla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ruiz-Bedolla has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 15, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40709 Document: 00516239531 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2022
No. 21-40709

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. It is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the 

untimeliness of Ruiz-Bedolla’s appeal. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 

825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam). Thus, we concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40709 Document: 00516239531 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/15/2022
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

          The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-Q of the registrant fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

August 11, 2006
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alfred Fernandez, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Alfred Fernandez
Alfred Fernandez
Acting Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2007
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Quicksilver deposits of the Pilot Mountains, Mineral County, Nevada: Chapter E in  *Contributions to economic geology (short papers and preliminary reports), 1927: Part I - Metals and nonmetals except fuels*

      January 1, 1927    

View Document

In the course of general geologic mapping of the Hawthorne quadrangle, in western Nevada, the writer undertook a short study of the quicksilver deposits of the Pilot Mountains. The work was. done under the supervision of Henry G. Ferguson, in charge of the field work in the Hawthorne quadrangle, and the writer was accompanied by L. B. Spencer, mining engineer, of Mina, Nev., whose intimate knowledge of the district greatly facilitated the study and to whom the writer is indebted for much valuable information. Data on the general geology of the district, collected by Messrs. Ferguson and Cathcart, were freely drawn upon.

The deposits of the Pilot Mountains were first described by Knopf* and later briefly by Ransome.2

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pilot Mountains
                  - nevada

View All **
Opinion issued July 30, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-01141-CR

———————————

WILLIAM WHITFIELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1586194

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, William Whitfield, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Although the motion does not contain a certificate of conference, it contains 

a certificate of service on counsel for the State, has been on file with this Court for 
2

more than ten days with no response, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a), 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Jamiah R. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-1870

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ON BEHALF OF Tamara SELLERS, Appellant, v. Wesley A. BATTISTE, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3836

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
E.P., Father of E.P., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-564

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jimmy FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

######  Agricultural Marketing Service

          - 7 CFR Part 1205
          - [Doc. # AMS-CN-09-0015; CN-09-002]

      ( print page 39211)    

### Correction

In rule document E9-16031 beginning on page 32400 in the issue of Wednesday, July 8, 2009, make the following correction:

§1205.510 

On page 32403, in §1205.510(3)(ii), in the table titled IMPORT ASSESSMENT TABLE, the third column heading, “Cents/pkg.” should read “Cents/kg.”, throughout the table.

[FR Doc. Z9-16031 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TYRONE BRETT LIGHTSEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2872

[March 31, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 02-20733CF10C.

Tyrone Brett Lightsey, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
R.D., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                              Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kendall Cowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

   (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         /s/ Kendall Cowan
------------------------------------
Name:    Kendall Cowan
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    August 10, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources of Salt Lake County, Utah      

      January 1, 1971    

View Document

This report is the eighth in a series prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights, that describes the water resources of the western basins of Utah. (See fig. 1.) Its purpose is to present available hydrologic data on the Park Valley area, to provide an evaluation of the potential water-resource development of the area, and to identify needed studies that would improve understanding of the area's water supply.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy and Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. SA98-43-000]


Leo Helzel; Notice of Petition for Adjustment

Correction

    In notice document 98-7544 beginning on page 14079, in the issue of 
Tuesday, March 24, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 14079, in the first column, the docket number is corrected 
to read as set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin Berns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer


May 12, 2006
Herman CHAMBERS, DOC #033836, Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF HARDEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-123

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Craig KRAUSE, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3381

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 24, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Jackie A. RANDALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-702

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 5, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 51009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-12902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1, 53, 54 and 301

[REG-142039-06; REG-139268-06]
RIN 1545-BG18; 1545-BG20


Excise Taxes on Prohibited Tax Shelter Transactions and Related 
Disclosure Requirements; Disclosure Requirements With Respect to 
Prohibited Tax Shelter Transactions; Requirement of Return and Time for 
Filing

Correction

    In proposed rule document E7-12902 beginning on page 36927 in the 
issue of Friday, July 6, 2007, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 36927, in the second column, in the first paragraph, 
``Sec. Sec. '' is corrected to read ``sections'' wherever it appears.
    2. On the same page, in the same paragraph, ``Sec. '' is corrected 
to read ``section'' wherever it appears.
    3. On the same page, in the third column, in the second paragraph, 
in the 14th line, ``1,250'' should read ``1250''.
    4. On the same page, in the same column, the small table following 
the second paragraph to read as follows:

Recordkeeping.............................  6 hr., 13 min.
Learning about the law or the form........  4 hr. 28 min.
Preparing, copying, assembling, and         4 hr. 46 min.
 sending the form to the IRS..............
 

    4. On the same page, in the same column, in the sixth line from the 
bottom of the page, ``Sec. '' is corrected to read ``section''.
    5. On the same page, in the same column, in the fifth line from the 
bottom of the page, ``Sec. Sec. '' is corrected to read ``sections''.
    6. On page 36928, in the first column, in the 17th line, ``Sec. '' 
should read ``section''.
    7. On the same page, in the same column, in the 20th line, 
``Sec. '' should read ``section''.
    8. On the same page, in the same column, under the heading 
``Covered Tax-Exempt Entities'', ``Sec. '' is corrected to read 
``section'' wherever it appears.
    9. On the same page, in the same paragraph, in the third line 
``Sec. Sec. '' is corrected to read ``sections''.
    10. On the same page, in the same column, in the last line of the 
column, ``Sec. '' should read ``section''.
    11. On the same page, in the second and third columns, ``Sec. '' 
should read ``section'' wherever it appears.
    12. On the same page, in the same column, in the 18th line, 
``Sec. Sec. '' should read ``sections''.
    13. On page 36929, in the first and second columns, ``Sec. '' 
should read ``section'' wherever it appears.


Sec.  53.4965-3  [Corrected]

    14. On page 36932, in the second column, in Sec.  53.4965-3(a), in 
the third line, ``means'' should read ``means''.


Sec.  53.4965-8  [Corrected]

    15. On page 36937, in the first column, in Sec.  53.4965-8(f), in 
Example 1, in paragraph (i), in the last line, ``Sec.  
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)'' should read ``Sec.  601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)''.

[FR Doc. Z7-12902 Filed 9-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Hunter Lane SARRETT v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01267-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 22, 2018 Closed: August 9, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.