alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 23501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[VT-006-01-1219a; A-1-FRL-5998-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Vermont; VOC Regulations

Correction

    In rule document 98-10724, beginning on page 19825, in the issue of 
Wednesday, April 22, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 52.2381  [Corrected]

    On page 19829, in Sec. 52.2381, in the table, in the first column, 
in the 17th line, ``5-252.13'' should read ``5-253.13''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
LF-72 (rev. 02/01/20) 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourt.gov

COVER SHEET TO ACCOMPANY ITEMS CONVENTIONALLY 

SUBMITTED FOR SEALING OR IN CAMERA REVIEW

INSTRUCTIONS: Items I through III must be completed by the party filer submitting an item for 

 sealing or review. See Local Rule 5005-1(A)(4). Conventionally filed documents 

 must be placed in a securely sealed envelope clearly marked with the warning 

 DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL. Compliance with this provision is required. 

I. CASE INFORMATION: 

Case Number: 20-14696-LMI Chapter: 11 

 

Name of Bankruptcy Case or Adversary Proceeding: Cinemex Holdings USA, Inc. 

II. FILING INFORMATION: 

Name of Filing Party: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 

 Address of Filing Party: 711 Louisiana, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77002 

 Phone Number of Filing Party: 713-221-7000 

 Filed on behalf of: Cinemex Holdings USA, Inc. 

III. TYPE OF SUBMISSION (check all that apply): 

  Sealed Document with:  Unsealed Motion to Seal  Sealed Motion to Seal 

  Sealed Document pursuant to court order entered on: ___________________ 

 Docket Entry #________________ 

 [If conventionally filed, must attach a copy of order authorizing sealing, unless order is sealed] 

  In Camera (Judicial) Review 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 375-2 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Temporal variation in adult survival rates of Roseate Terns during periods of increasing and declining populations      

      January 1, 2008    

View Document

We used 19 years of mark-recapture/resighting data collected on 11, 020 birds from 1988-2006 at five colony sites in Massachusetts, New York, and Connecticut, USA, to examine temporal variation in the survival rates of adult Roseate Terns (Sterna dougallii) during periods of overall population increase (1988-2000) and decline (2000-2006).  Roseate Terns nested at only one colony site in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts at the start of this period, but two more sites in this area were recolonized as the study progressed.  Adult survival rates varied temporally in overall population increase (0.835 +/- 0.006 SE) and the period of population decline (0.835 +/- 0.008 SE). As expected based on previous work, adult survival from 1991 to 1992 was lowered as a result of a severe hurricane in August 1991.  An oil spill in Buzzards Bay in April 2003 did not appear to result in lower survival of the birds nesting at the variation in other vital rates of this species (such as postfledging survival) needs to be examined to determine the likely cause(s) of the recent population decline.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeffrey Spendelow, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jspendelow@usgs.gov

301-497-5665

#### James Hines

##### Computer Scientist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jhines@usgs.gov

301-497-5661

#### James Nichols, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus 

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jnichols@usgs.gov

301-497-5660

## Related Content

#### Jeffrey Spendelow, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jspendelow@usgs.gov

301-497-5665

#### James Hines

##### Computer Scientist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jhines@usgs.gov

301-497-5661

#### James Nichols, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus 

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jnichols@usgs.gov

301-497-5660

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
  
 **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-34554, No. 333-34556, No. 333-34558, No. 333-85962 and 333-121035 of Collectors Universe, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated September 23, 2004 (January 6, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 15) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to a change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective July 1, 2002; a restatement to report the assets and related liabilities of the collectibles auctions and direct sales businesses as held for sale and the related operating results as discontinued operations; and the restatement as described in Note 15), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Collectors Universe, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2004.
 
 
 
 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
 Costa Mesa, California
 January 18, 2005
Kenneth HUNT, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4791

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Scott Brian WEIAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00342-CV

FRANK M. KUDLAC, JR. APPELLANT

V.

TSM RESTORATIONS, INC. D/B/A 

SERVICE MASTER BY BRIDGES

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On August 29, 2012, and September 18, 2012, we notified appellant, in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J. 

DELIVERED: October 11, 2012

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil 

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial 

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing 

fees in courts of appeals).
Ricardo Rene Cortez MORENO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Sergio Hernandez LEMUS, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 20, 2021.

Case 21-17336-MAM Doc 61 Filed 10/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-17336-MAM Doc 61 Filed 10/21/21 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

         CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Transition Auto Finance IV (the
"Company") on form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Kenneth
C. Lowe, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial conditions and results of
            operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005                     /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Kenneth C. Lowe,
                                        Chief Executive and Chief Financial
                                        Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Viscous relaxation of Oort and Edgeworth craters on Pluto: Possible indicators of an epoch of early high heat flow      

      August 17, 2023    

Impact craters, with their well-defined initial shapes, have proven useful as heat flow probes of a number of icy bodies, provided characteristics of viscous relaxation can be identified. For Pluto's numerous craters, such identifications are hampered/complicated by infilling and erosion by mobile volatile ices, but not in every case. Large craters offer relatively deep probes of rheological structure, and on Pluto two large old craters in a major dark (volatile-ice free) region are probably the best examples for possible viscous relaxation: Oort (115-km diameter) and Edgeworth (140-km diameter). They are similar in size, location, and apparent age (morphological preservation), but may or may not be coeval. Edgeworth is particularly shallow and its floor appears bowed up above the original ground plane, a classic hallmark of viscous relaxation in which viscosity decreases sharply with depth. Oort is less relaxed, but may be somewhat younger and less affected by an early epoch of high heat flow. Finite element calculations show that this heat flow would have to have been substantial to explain Edgeworth's upbowed floor by viscous relaxation, several times steady-state radiogenic values for present-day surface temperatures. We expect Pluto's brittle ice lithosphere to be fractured and porous, however, markedly reducing thermal conductivity and increasing temperatures at depth and relaxation for a given heat flow. We find that most relaxation occurs well within 100 Myr after impact for Edgeworth and Oort, and focus attention on a temporal (and/or regional) epoch of elevated heat flow, possibly tied to the serpentinization of Pluto's rocky core.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael Bland, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist 

Astrogeology Science Center

mbland@usgs.gov

928-556-7080

## Related Content

#### Michael Bland, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist 

Astrogeology Science Center

mbland@usgs.gov

928-556-7080

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Pluto

View All **
Case 21-11549-RAM Doc 26-2 Filed 03/19/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 21-11549-RAM Doc 26-2 Filed 03/19/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 21-11549-RAM Doc 26-2 Filed 03/19/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 21-11549-RAM Doc 26-2 Filed 03/19/21 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In RE: JULIO C CHIRINO § Case Number: 20-22980-AJC-13

§

Debtor(s) § Chapter: 13

REQUEST FOR NOTICE UNDER BANKRUPTCY RULE 2002

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Freedom Truck Finance, LLC hereby gives notice as follows:

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §342(f)(1), AIS Portfolio Services, LP hereby requests that:

(i) all notices given or required to be given in the case; and

(ii) all pleadings and correspondence served or required to be served in this case,

regarding Freedom Truck Finance, LLC should be directed to AIS Portfolio Services, LP at the following mailing

address effective immediately:

Attn: Freedom Truck Finance, LLC Department

AIS Portfolio Services, LP

Account: XXXXXXXXXXXXX1001

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

This request encompasses all notices, copies and pleadings referred to in Rules 2002, 9007 or 9008 of the

Bankruptcy Rules, including, without limitation, notices of any Orders, Motions, Demands, Complaints, Petitions,

Pleadings, Requests, Applications, Schedules, Statements, Plans, and any other documents brought before this court

in this case, whether formal or informal, written or oral, or transmitted or conveyed by mail, delivery, telephone,

telecopier, telex, or otherwise which affects or seeks to affect the above case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ambrish Patel

Ambrish Patel

Claims Processor

Bankruptcy Servicer for Freedom Truck Finance, LLC

AIS Portfolio Services, LP

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

(817)277-2011, Fax (817) 461-8070

ecfnotices@ascensioncapitalgroup.com

File # 1324660

Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 11 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY

COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF 

FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH 

DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB Case No.: 21-13230-EPK

 Chapter 7

Debtor.

/

CHRISTI LEE STRAUB Adv. No.: 21-01155-EPK

Plaintiff,

v.

MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION LOAN 

AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION OF THE UNITED STATES

ANDTHE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA.

Defendants.

/

PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR DEFAULT FINAL

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

Plaintiff, CHRISTI LEE STRAUB., by and through her undersigned counsel, moves for 

the entry of a Default Final Judgment against Defendant UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, and 

in support thereof state:

1. The Adversary Complaint was filed on May 18, 2021 (DE 1) (the “Complaint”).

2. The Summons and Notice of Pretrial/Trial in an Adversary Proceeding (DE 2) (the 

“Summons”), and Order Setting Filing and Disclosure Requirements for Pretrial and Trial (DE 3) 

(the “Order”) were issued on May 19, 2021.

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 42 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 2
2

3. An answer to the Adversary Complaint was due on or before June 23, 2021.

4. The Summons, Complaint, and Order were properly served on Defendant, 

University of Minnesota via Certified Mail (70201810000184333207) which was delivered on 

July 26, 2021; and U.S. Mail on July 19, 2021, and a Certificate of Service filed as to same (DE 

9).

5. To date, University of Minnesota has not filed an answer or responsive pleading 

with the time fixed by the Court or by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(a).

6. On August 26, 2022, a Clerk’s Entry of Default was entered (DE 31).

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, CHRISTI LEE STRAUB, respectfully requests that this Court 

enter a Default Final Judgment against Defendant.

RULE 7055-1 VERIFICATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 7055-1, I hereby verify under penalty of perjury, that the Defendant 

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA has been properly served with the Complaint, that no response 

has been served on the Plaintiff or her undersigned counsel, and that the Defendant, being a 

corporate entity, is not a member of the military service.

Dated this 31st day of October, 2022 VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

500 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 200

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 765-3166

Facsimile: (954) 756-7103

Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

 By: /s/ Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.

Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 64500

Case 21-01155-MAM Doc 42 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 2
Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 150-4    Filed 03/09/21    Page 1 of 2

Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 150-4    Filed 03/09/21    Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 97-2179, appearing on page 4078, in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 28, 1997, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE was inadvertently 
added to the agency line and should be removed.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Chapter 11 Cases

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-13797-SMG

LPT, LLC, Case No. 21-15537-SMG

LIBERTY POWER MARYLAND, LLC, Case No. 21-15539-SMG

LIBERTY POWER DISTRICT OF 

COLUMBIA, LLC, Case No. 21-15540-SMG

Debtors. (Jointly administered 21-13797-SMG)

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE (I) MOTION FOR RELIEF

FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §362(D) [ECF NO. 551] 

AND (II) ALL OTHER RELIEF REQUESTED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH

THIS MATTER came before the Court on March 2, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. (the “Hearing”) 

upon (i) the Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay Pursuant to 11 U.S.C §362(d) (the “Stay 

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 9, 2022.

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 583 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 3
2

Relief Motion”)1[ECF No. 551] filed by BLT Steak, LLC and BLT Fish, LLC, individually and 

as the appointed representatives of the class certified in BLT Steak, LLC and BLT Fish, LLC v. 

Liberty Power Corp., LLC d/b/a Liberty Power New York and Liberty Power Holdings, LLC, Index 

No. 151293/2013 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County) (collectively, the “Movants”), (ii) the Debtors’ 

Objection to Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §362(d) (the 

“Objection”) [ECF No. 570]; and (iii) the Response and Joinder to Motion for Relief from 

Automatic Stay Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §362(d) (the “Response”) [ECF No. 571 & 572] filed by 

Samuel Katz and Lynne Rhodes. 

The Court, having reviewed and considered the Stay Relief Motion, the Objection, and the 

Response, having heard argument of counsel to the parties in support of and against the relief 

requested in the Stay Relief Motion, and otherwise being fully advised in the premises, and upon 

the record of the Hearing and after due deliberation thereon, it is,

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Stay Relief Motion is DENIED without prejudice for the reasons set forth on 

the record at the Hearing. 

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related 

to the implementation of this Order. 

###

Submitted By:

Paul J. Battista, Esq.

Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A.

Counsel for Debtors-in-Possession

100 SE 2nd Street, Suite 4400

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: 305-349-2300

 

1 All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Stay 

Relief Motion. 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 583 Filed 03/10/22 Page 2 of 3
3

pbattista@gjb-law.com

Copies to:

Paul J. Pattista, Esq.

[Attorney Battista is directed to serve a conformed copy of this order on all interested parties and 

file a certificate of service with the court within 3 days]

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 583 Filed 03/10/22 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Twelfth Annual Report of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories: A report of progress of the exploration in Wyoming and Idaho for the year 1878, Part I: Geology, paleontology, and zoology      

      January 1, 1883    

View Document

This report includes the labors of the corps for the field season of 1878, and the office work until the close of the existence of the Survey by law June 30, 1879. Several of the members have, however, performed very important work since that time in elaborating their individual reports, which has added greatly to their interest and value.

A general summary of the work for the season of 1878 will be appropriate in this connection. Owing to the length of the session, Congress did not pass the usual appropriation for the work of the Survey until July, and consequently the period for work in the field was comparatively short.

The headquarters of the Survey was at Cheyenne, Wyo., the same as the preceding season. Four parties were organized, but in such a manner that in case of necessity they could be divided for special duty. All our outfit and animals were transported from Cheyenne to Point of Rocks and Green River Stations on the Union Pacific Railroad, and from thence the parties pursued their way northward to their respective fields of labor.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Wind River
                  -  Yellowstone National Park
                  - Colorado
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HOWARD LEE HAMILTON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2190

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed December 12, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Manatee County; Brian A. Iten, 

Judge.

Howard Lee Hamilton, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mansfield v. State, 911 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2005); Rivera v. 

State, 717 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1998); Mungin v. State, 689 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 1995); 

Kearse v. State, 662 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1995). 

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.