alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer -- Predevelopment to 1992      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

Changes in water levels in the High Plains aquifet underlying parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming result from the variability of precipitation, land use, and ground-water withdrawals. From the beginning of development of the High Plains aquifer to 1980, water levels declined throughout much of the area; the declines exceeded 100 feet in parts of the central and southern High Plains. From 1980 to 1992, water levels continued to decline in these same areas, but at a slightly slower overall annual rate. This slower rate of decline was associated, in part, with a decrease in ground-water application for irrigated agriculture and above normal precipitation throughout the High Plains during 1980-91. Declines exceeding 20 feet were common from 1980 to 1992 in areas of intense irrigation development in Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. In the northern High Plains, declines of 10 to 20 feet from 1980 to 1992 were widespread in northeastern Colorado, southwestern Nebraska, and the Nebraska Panhandle. Water levels were generally stable from 1980 to 1992 in most other areas of the High Plains. In a large area in the southern High Plains of Texas, however, water-level rises exceeded 20 feet. Also, scattered rises of 5 to 10 feet occurred in eastern Nebraska. The estimated average area-weighted water-level change, from 1991 to 1992 was -0.55, even though precipitation was well-above normal in 1991 in the High Plains. Water- level declines of 3 to 5 feet were widespread in the intensively irrigated areas of southwestern Kansas and the northern part of the Southern High Plains of Texas. These large declines were not closely related to 1991 precipitation patterns in those areas. Declines of 1 to 3 feet were common throughout the intensively irrigated areas of the Northern High Plains and the less intensively irrigated areas of the Central and Southern High Plains. Water levels continued to rise, generally 1 to 3 feet in the extreme Southern High Plains of Texas. Rises of 1 to 3 feet also occurred in parts of northeastern and central Nebraska.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Wyoming-Montana Water Science Center - Helena Office          

3162 Bozeman AvenueHelena, MT59601United States

(406) 457-5900

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - High Plains Aquifer
                  - Colorado
                  -  Kansas
                  -  Nebraska
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Oklahoma
                  -  Texas
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Surface water supply of the United States, 1960-65, Part 16, Hawaii and other Pacific areas      

      January 1, 1971    

View Document

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - hawaii

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-50131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

18 CFR Part 1314


Book-Entry Procedures for TVA Power Securities Issued Through the 
Federal Reserve Banks

Correction

    In rule document 97-228, beginning on page 920 in the issue of 
Tuesday, Janury 7, 1997, make the following corrections:


Sec. 1314.2  [Corrected]

    1. On page 920, in the third column, in Sec. 1314.2, the second 
paragraph should be designated as ``(a)''.


Sec. 1314.5  [Corrected]

    2. On page 922, in the first column, in Sec. 1314.5(b), in the 
sixteenth line, ``Reserve bank'' should read ``Reserve Bank''.


Sec. 1314.7  [Corrected]

    3. On the same page, in the third column, in Sec. 1314.7, in the 
fifth line, ``Reserve Bank'' should read ``Reserve Banks''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 99-41122 Summary Calendar

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ADRIANA TAPIA, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-135-2

_________________________________________________________________ October 27, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The federal pub lic defender appointed to represent Adriana Tapia has moved for lea ve to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Tapia received copies of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.2

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsib ilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Calvin Dejuan FORMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
### NUMBER 13

- 1 3

- 00539

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. STEPHEN B. TYLER

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1

Relator, the State of Texas ex rel. Stephen B. Tyler, filed a petition for writ of

mandamus seeking to compel the respondent, the Honorable Daniel Gilliam, Presiding

Judge of County Court at Law No. Two of Victoria County, Texas, to issue written

findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning his order granting a n instructed

verdict and the resulting entry of a judgment of acquittal in trial court cause number 2

-
100157, the State of Texas v. Michael Chavez

.

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show: (1) that he has no

adequate remedy at law, and ( 2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re

State ex rel. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). If

the relator fails to meet both of these requirements, then the petition for writ of

mandamus should be deni ed. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. C t . of App. at

Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of

mandamus and the applicable law, is of the opin ion that relator has not met his burden

to obtain mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Young , 236 S.W.3d at 210. Accordingly,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 9th day of October, 2013

.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The social, economic, and environmental importance of inland fish and fisheries      

      June 1, 2016    

Though reported capture fisheries are dominated by marine production, inland fish and fisheries make substantial contributions to meeting the challenges faced by individuals, society, and the environment in a changing global landscape. Inland capture fisheries and aquaculture contribute over 40% to the world’s reported finfish production from less than 0.01% of the total volume of water on earth. These fisheries provide food for billions and livelihoods for millions of people worldwide. Herein, using supporting evidence from the literature, we review 10 reasons why inland fish and fisheries are important to the individual (food security, economic security, empowerment), to society (cultural services, recreational services, human health and well-being, knowledge transfer and capacity building), and to the environment (ecosystem function and biodiversity, as aquatic “canaries”, the “green food” movement). However, the current limitations to valuing the services provided by inland fish and fisheries make comparison with other water resource users extremely difficult. This list can serve to demonstrate the importance of inland fish and fisheries, a necessary first step to better incorporating them into agriculture, land-use, and water resource planning, where they are currently often underappreciated or ignored.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Rogers, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mwrogers@usgs.gov

931-372-3032

## Related Content

#### Mark Rogers, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mwrogers@usgs.gov

931-372-3032

### Contact

####               National Climate Adaptation Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveMS 516Reston, VA20192United States

casc@usgs.gov

(703) 648-5801

### Explore Search

                  - Climate
                  - Ecosystems

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: Chapter 7 

EMMANUEL ENRIQUE PACIN, Case No. 21-20189-LMI 

 Debtor. 

 / 

ORDER DENYING DISCHARGE 

 This matter came before the Court on the Notice of Non-Compliance [ECF No. 241] (the 

“Notice”) filed by interested party Drew Dillworth, chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of 

Pac Comm Inc., Case No. 21-19682-RAM. Pursuant to the Notice, Mr. Dillworth has informed 

the Court that Debtor has failed to cure the default described in the Court’s Order [ECF No. 234] 

Granting Motion to Deny Discharge (the “Order”). 

The Court has reviewed the Order and the Notice, considered the record in this case, and 

therefore, does - 

ORDER and ADJUDGE that – 

1. The Debtor’s discharge is DENIED. 

Laurel M. Isicoff, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court 

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 25, 2024.

Case 21-20189-LMI Doc 242 Filed 06/26/24 Page 1 of 2
#12863030 v1 

2. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enter any further orders or to take any other actions 

that it deems just and proper. 

### 

Submitted by and Copy furnished to: 

Drew M. Dillworth, Esq. 

(Attorney Dillworth shall serve a copy of this Order 

as provided by Local Rule and file a Certificate of Service) 

Case 21-20189-LMI Doc 242 Filed 06/26/24 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(6)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

National News Release        October 20, 2016        Water Detected on Largest Metallic Asteroid in Solar System

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections

Program        October 1, 2018        IAU - WGCCRE

Program        November 9, 2018        Workshops
# L_2008050DE.01007101.xml

| 23.2.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 50/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 50/71

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 805/2004 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 21. April 2004 zur Einführung eines europäischen Vollstreckungstitels für unbestrittene Forderungen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 143 vom 7. April 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 143 vom 7. April 2004

Seite 27, Anhang I, Nummer 12.1. dritte Alternative:

anstatt:

„oder der Schuldner hat die Ladung nachweislich im Sinne von Artikel 8 Absatz 2 erhalten. “

muss es heißen:

„oder der Schuldner hat die Ladung nachweislich im Sinne von Artikel 18 Absatz 2 erhalten. “.

---
EXHIBIT
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-109451), Form S-3, as
amended (No. 333-127462), Form S-8 (No. 333-140084), Form S-8 (No. 333-140086),
Form  S-8, as amended (No. 333-129164) and Form S-3, as amended (No.
333-131191) of New Dragon Asia Corp. of our report dated March 11, 2008 relating
to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Dragon Asia Corp. for the year ended December
25, 2007.




/s/ Grobstein, Horwath &Company
LLP





Sherman
Oaks, California


April 6,
2009
Daniel A. ROCHA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 34965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[Attorney General Order No. 2156-98]
RIN 1105-AA20


Revision of Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act 
Regulations and Implementation of Electronic Freedom of Information Act 
Amendments of 1996

Correction

    In rule document 98-14341 beginning on page 29591, in the issue of 
Monday, June 1, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 29593, in the first column, under the heading Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, in the third line, ``U.S.C. 605 ()),'' should read 
``U.S.C. 605 (b)), ''.
    2. On page 29593, in the first column, under the heading Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, in the third line from the bottom, `` indiidual'' 
should read ``individual''.


Sec. 16.11  [Corrected]

    3. On page 29598, in the first column, in Sec. 16.11(b)(7), in the 
fourth line from the bottom, after time remove ``include'' and insert 
``includes time spent considering any formal objection to disclosure 
made by a business submitter under Sec. 16.8, but does not''.
    4. On page 29599, in the third column, in Sec. 16.11(k)(3)(i), in 
the fourth line, ``furthred''should read ``furthered''.


Sec. 16.41  [Corrected]

    5. On page 29600, in the third column, in Sec. 16.41(a), in the 
29th line, ``make'' should read ``'mark''.


Sec. 16.42  [Corrected]

    6. On page 29601, in the second column, in Sec. 16.42(e), in the 
fourth line from the bottom, ``regrading'' should read ``regarding''.


Sec. 16.51  [Corrected]

    7. On page 29603, in the second column, in Sec. 16.51(a), in the 
last line, `` that.'' should read ``that:''.


Sec. 16.54  [Corrected]

    8. On page 29603, in the third column, in Sec. 16.54(c), 
``individuals'' should read ``individual''.


Appendix to Part 16  [Corrected]

    9. On page 29604, in the first column, in the 10th line, ``2053'' 
should read ``20530''.
    10. On page 29604, in the second column, under the heading C, in 
the 12th line, ``20503'' should read ``20530''.
    11. On page 29604, in the second column, under the heading C, in 
the 19th line, ``20503'' should read ``20530''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40087

Conference Calendar

 

CRUZ POLANCO, III,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

 

TOM MANESS, Criminal District Attorney of Jefferson County 

Texas; RODNEY D. CONERLY, Assistant Criminal District 

Attorney; EDWARD SHETTLE, Assistant Criminal District 

Attorney; WAYLON G. THOMPSON, Assistant Criminal District 

Attorney; JULIE JOL, Assistant State Attorney General; GARY

L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; LEONARD GIBLIN, Judge of 252nd 

District Court of Jefferson County Texas; JEWEL LYDES, 

Deputy Clerk of US District Court Beaumont Texas; EARL S. 

HINES, US Magistrate Judge Beaumont Division; THAD 

HEARTFIELD, US District Judge Beaumont Division, 

 

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-99

--------------------

October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cruz Polanco, III (Polanco), Texas prisoner #696407, appeals

the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action as
No. 01-40087

-2-

frivolous and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). 

Polanco’s only basis for his Equal Protection claim is that

certain indictments were not supported by criminal complaints. 

Texas law does not require that an indictment be supported by a

complaint. See Chapple v. State, 521 S.W.2d 280, 281-82 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1975). Even it did, Polanco’s conclusory allegations

of racial discrimination do not raise a cognizable Equal

Protection claim. See Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299, 306

(5th Cir. 1997); Muhammad v. Lynaugh, 966 F.2d 901, 903 (5th Cir.

1992); Cunningham v. Beavers, 858 F.2d 269, 272 (5th Cir. 1988). 

Polanco’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the

district court's dismissal of this lawsuit as frivolous

constitute two strikes for purposes of the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

bar. Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). We

caution Polanco that once he accumulates three strikes, he may

not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; WARNING ISSUED.
Shane BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4423

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 53747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11006]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 53747]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement

Correction

    In notice document 98-25621 beginning on page 51059, in the issue 
of Thursday, September 24, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 51059, in the third column, under the heading DATES, in the 
second line, ``[]'' should read ``November 23, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - california(3)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - (-)virginia(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Woody riparian vegetation near selected streamgages in the western United States      

      October 11, 2012    

View Document

Areal cover and occupancy of woody riparian species near 456 streamgages in the western United States were obtained from site visits during the growing seasons of 1996-2002. We made concomitant estimates of grazing intensity, channel stabilization and incision, gradient, sediment particle size, and nearby planting of Russian olive. The purpose of this publication is to describe the data set and make it available to other investigators in an electronic format.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jonathan Friedman, PhD

##### Research Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

friedmanj@usgs.gov

303-541-3017

#### Patrick  Shafroth, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

Fort Collins Science Center

shafrothp@usgs.gov

970-226-9327

## Related Content

#### Jonathan Friedman, PhD

##### Research Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

friedmanj@usgs.gov

303-541-3017

#### Patrick  Shafroth, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

Fort Collins Science Center

shafrothp@usgs.gov

970-226-9327

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona;California;Colorado;Idaho;Kansas;Montana;Nebraska;Nevada;New Mexio;North Dakota;Oklahoma;Oregon;South Dakota;Texas;Utah;Washington;Wyoming
                  - Arizona
                  - california
                  - Colorado
                  - Idaho
                  - kansas
                  - Montana
                  - Nebraska
                  - nevada
                  - New Mexio
                  - North Dakota
                  - Oklahoma
                  - Oregon
                  - South Dakota
                  - texas
                  - Utah
                  - Washington
                  - Wyoming

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-61013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AD74


Extension of Comment Period: Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations 
Regarding Baiting and Baited Areas

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-26827 appearing on page 53635 in the 
issue of Tuesday, October 6, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 53635, in the third column, in the last paragraph, in the 
last line, ``October 31, 1998'' should read ``October 22, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Dyas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ James Dyas
James Dyas
Principal Financial Officer


May 12, 2006