alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**XIOM      Corp.**

**CODE      OF ETHICS**

**FOR**

**DIRECTORS,      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER      OR      CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING**

**SIMILAR      FUNCTIONS**

*GENERAL      PHILOSOPHY*

*APPLICABILITY*

*STANDARDS      OF CONDUCT*

| ·   | act                with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of actual                or                apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional                relationships; |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| ·   | provide                full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports                and                documents that XIOM files with, or submits to, the Securities and                Exchange                Commission (“Commission”) and in other public communications made by                XIOM; |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| ·   | comply                with applicable governmental laws, rules and                regulations; |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| ·   | promote                the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code of Ethics                to                XIOM's board of directors and outside legal                counsel; |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| ·   | respect                the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of                employment; |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| ·   | maintain                the skills necessary and relevant to XIOM's needs;                and |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| ·   | proactively                promote ethical and honest behavior among employees of XIOM and its                subsidiaries. |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
STATE EX REL. Jeremiah R. TENO v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 17-KH-0740

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

PER CURIAM:

*261Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Michael SULLIVAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Heather Ann WAHOLEK, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4104

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied as moot.

Denied as moot.

Fees is denied.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

24210

Vol. 63, No. 84

Friday, May 1, 1998

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

Biweekly Notice; Applications and

Amendments to Facility Operating

Licenses Involving No Significant

Hazards Considerations

Correction

In notice document 98–10470,

beginning on page 19964, in the issue of

Wednesday, April 22, 1998, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 19984, in the second

column, in the 24th line, ‘‘Amendment

No.: 221.’’ should read ‘‘Amendment

No.: 220.’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, after line 39, insert the

following text:

IES Utilities Inc, Central Iowa Power

Cooperative, and Corn Belt Power

Cooperative, Docket No. 50-331, Duane

Arnold Energy Center, Linn County,

Iowa

Date of application for amendment:

February 3, 1998.

Brief description of amendment: The

amendment revises the definitions of

Cold Condition and Cold Shutdown and

adds a new section, 3.17, ‘‘Vessel

Hydrostatic Pressure and Leak Testing,’’

to the Technical Specifications to

specifically allow reactor vessel

hydrostatic pressure testing to be

performed during plant shutdown.

Date of issuance: March 31, 1998.

Effective date: March 31, 1998.

Amendment No.: 221.

Facility Operating License No. DPR49: Amendment revised the Technical

Specifications.

Date of initial notice in Federal

Register: February 26, 1998 (63 FR

9874). The Commission’s related

evaluation of the amendment is

contained in a Safety Evaluation dated

March 31, 1998.

No significant hazards consideration

comments received: No.

Local Public Document Room

location: Cedar Rapids Public Library,

500 First Street, SE., Cedar Rapids, Iowa

52401.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97–CE–69–AD; Amendment 39–

10437; AD 98–07–17]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Twin

Commander Aircraft Corporation 500,

520, 560, 680, 681, 685, 690, 695, and

720 Series Airplanes

Correction

In rule document 98–8579, beginning

on page 16679 in the issue of Monday,

April 6, 1998, make the following

corrections:

§ 39.13 [Corrected]

On page 16680, in the third column,

in § 39.13, in the ‘‘Applicability’’

section, in the table, in the first line,

‘‘5500–A, 5500–B, 5500–S, 5500–U’’

should read ‘‘500–A, 500–B, 500–S,

500–U’’. In the second line, ‘‘5560,

5560–A, 5560–E, and 5560–F’’ should

read ‘‘560, 560–A, 560–E, and 560–F’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 198 (Wednesday, October 14, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 55175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-31014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 59

[AD-FRL-6149-7]
RIN 2060-AE55


National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for 
Architectural Coatings

Correction

    In rule document 98-22659 beginning on page 48848, in the issue of 
Friday, September 11, 1998, make the following corrections:

PART 59--[CORRECTED]

    On page 48886, in appendix A to subpart D, the entries in Table 1 
are corrected to read as set forth below.

 Table 1 To Subpart D.--Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), Content Limits
                       for Architectural Coatings
  [Unless otherwise specified, limits are expressed in grams of VOC per
  liter of coating thinned to the manufacturer's maximum recommendation
 excluding the volume of any water, exempt compounds, or colorant added
                             to tint bases.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Grams VOC per  Pounds VOC per
            Coating category                   liter         gallon <SUP>a
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stains:
    Clear and semitransparent...........             550             4.6
    Opaque..............................             350             2.9
    Low solids..........................            120<SUP>b            1.0<SUP>b
Wood preservatives:
    Low solids..........................            120<SUP>b            1.0<SUP>b
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<SUP>a  English units are provided for information only. Compliance will be
  determined based on the VOC content limit, as expressed in metric
  units.
<SUP>b  Units are grams of VOC per liter (pounds of VOC per gallon) of
  coating, including water and exempt compounds, thinned to the maximum
  thinning recommended by the manufacturer.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Dongli Xia TRAYWICK v. STATE

CR-15-1113

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 26, 2017

Affirmed.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 1997 / Corrections 10115

Tel: ...................................... 208/765–3200

Fax: ..................................... 208/664–1962

Dates: .................................. December 11, 1997 .............................. December 12, 1997

Times: ................................. 9 a.m.–5 p.m. .......................................

6:30 p.m.–8:30 p.m.

9:30 a.m.–3:30 p.m.

Place: ................................... Madison Hotel ......................................

515 Madison Street

Seattle, Washington 98104

Same location

Tel: ...................................... 206/583–0300

Fax: ..................................... 206/624–8125

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs

Administration

Outer Continental Shelf Pipelines

Correction

In notice document 97–3769,

beginning on page 7037, in the issue of

Friday, February 14, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 7037, in the second

column, in the second full paragraph, in

the sixth line, ‘‘he’’ should read ‘‘the’’.

2. On the same page, in the third

column, under II. Authority, in the first

paragraph, in the fourth line ‘‘or’’

should read ‘‘of’’.

3. On page 7038, in the third column,

under V. Limitations, in item 3, in the

fourth line, ‘‘of’’ should read ‘‘or’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Quality of wet deposition in the Grand Calumet River watershed, northwestern Indiana, June 30, 1992-August 31, 1993      

      January 1, 1995    

View Document

Northwestern Indiana is one of the most heavily industrialized and largest steel-producing areas in the United States. High temperature processes, such as fossil-fuel combustion and steel production, release contaminants to the atmosphere that may result in wet deposition being a major contributor to major ion and trace-metal loadings in north- western Indiana and Lake Michigan. A wet-deposition collection site was established at the Gary (Indiana) Regional Airport in June 1992 to monitor the chemical quality of wet deposition. Weekly samples were collected at this site from June 30, 1992, through August 31, 1993, and were analyzed for pH, specific conductance, and selected major ions and trace metals. Forty-eight samples collected during the study were of sufficient volumes for some of the determinations to be performed. Median constituent concentrations were determined for samples collected during warm weather and cold weather (November 1 through March 31). Median concentrations were substituted for missing values from samples with insufficient volumes for analysis of all the constituents of interest. Constituent concentrations were converted to weekly loadings. Two values were calculated to provide a range for the weekly loading for samples with measured concentrations of constituents less than the method reporting limit. The minimum weekly loading was computed by substituting zero for the constituent concentration; the maximum weekly loading was computed by substituting the method reporting limit for the concentration. If all of the sample concentrations measured were greater than the method reporting limit, an annual loading value was computed. The annual loadings could be used to assist in estimating the contribution of wet deposition to the total annual constituent loadings in the Grand Calumet River in northwestern Indiana.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Grand Calumet River Watershed
                  - Indiana

View All **
STATE EX REL. Eugene Tyrone WATKINS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0765

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, his claim is non-cognizable and repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 930.3 and 930.4 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 1999 /Rules and Regulations 3453

[FR Doc. 99–1432 Filed 1–19–99; 12:48 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 679

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic

Zone Off Alaska

CFR Correction

In Title 50 of the Code of Federal

Regulations, parts 600 to End, revised as

of Oct. 1, 1998, on page 440, first

column, § 679.2 is corrected by adding

paragraph (2) to the definition of

Catcher vessel to read as follows:

§ 679.2 Definitions.

* * * * *

Catcher vessel means:

(1) * * *

(2) (Applicable through December 31,

1998). With respect to moratorium

groundfish, as defined in paragraph (1)

of this definition; with respect to

moratorium crab species, a vessel that is

used to catch, take, or harvest

moratorium crab species that are

retained on board as fresh fish product

at any time.

* * *

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 26, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-14827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-142695-05]
RIN 1545-BF00


Employee Benefits - Cafeteria Plans

Correction

    In proposed rule document E7-14827 beginning on page 43938 in the 
issue of Monday, August 6, 2007, make the following correction:
    On page 43939, in the first column, the first heading:
    I. New Proposed Sec.  1.125-1-Qualified and Nonqualified Benefits 
in Cafeteria Plans Section 125 Exclusive Noninclusion Rule
should be two separate headings:
    I. New Proposed Sec.  1.125-1-Qualified and Nonqualified Benefits 
in Cafeteria Plans
Section 125 Exclusive Noninclusion Rule

[FR Doc. Z7-14827 Filed 9-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 221 (Friday, November 16, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-21903]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 221 / Friday, November 16, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 64708]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2007-0030; Notice 1]


Graco Children's Products, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance

Correction

    In notice document E7-21903 beginning on page 63231 in the issue of 
Thursday, November 8, 2007, make the following correction:
    On page 63232, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, 
``December 10, 2007'' should read ``November 19, 2007''.

[FR Doc. Z7-21903 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 21, 2012

t0514 

# Order

May 21, 2012

144772

HATTIE ISAAC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144772 COA: 301347 WCAC: 06-000242 SDW HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANC E COMPANY, and SECOND INJURY FUND VOCATIONALLY HANDICAPPED PROVISIONS, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 22, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-119286, 333-105583,333-94317, 333-81690, 333-59602, 333-54566, 333-54568, 333-48460, 333-48464, 333-39440, 333-38828, 333-38834 and 333-31420) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan, 1999 Stock Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan,RightPoint Software, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, Octane Software, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, Octane Software, Inc. Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, Octane Software, Inc. 2000 Pennsylvania Plan, iLeverage Corporation 1997 Stock Plan, eClass Direct,Inc. 1998 Stock Plan, Chief Executive Officer Common Stock Sale, Moss Software, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan and Moss Software, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan of Epiphany, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Epiphany, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Francisco, California 

March 9, 2005
hltk_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1

 

 

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 


	 
	3

	


	 



 

 


	 
	4

	


	 



 

 


	 
	5

	


	 



 

 


	 
	6

	


	 



 

 

 


	
7
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Sea-floor geology in northwestern Block Island Sound, Rhode Island      

      March 14, 2014    

View Document

Multibeam-echosounder and sidescan-sonar data, collected by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in a 69-square-kilometer area of northwestern Block Island Sound, are used with sediment samples, and still and video photography of the sea floor, collected by the U.S. Geological Survey at 43 stations within this area, to interpret the sea-floor features and sedimentary environments. Features on the sea floor include boulders, sand waves, scour depressions, modern marine sediments, and trawl marks. Boulders, which are often several meters wide, are found in patches in the shallower depths and tend to be overgrown with sessile flora and fauna. They are lag deposits of winnowed glacial drift, and reflect high-energy environments characterized by processes associated with erosion and nondeposition. Sand waves and megaripples tend to have crests that either trend parallel to shore with 20- to 50-meter (m) wavelengths or trend perpendicular to shore with several-hundred-meter wavelengths. The sand waves reflect sediment transport directions perpendicular to shore by waves, and parallel to shore by tidal or wind-driven currents, respectively. Scour depressions, which are about 0.5 m lower than the surrounding sea floor, have floors of gravel and coarser sand than bounding modern marine sediments. These scour depressions, which are conspicuous in the sidescan-sonar data because of their more highly reflective coarser sediment floors, are likely formed by storm-generated, seaward-flowing currents and maintained by the turbulence in bottom currents caused by their coarse sediments. Areas of the sea floor with modern marine sediments tend to be relatively flat to current-rippled and sandy.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Seth D. Ackerman

##### Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

sackerman@usgs.gov

508-457-2315

## Related Content

#### Seth D. Ackerman

##### Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

sackerman@usgs.gov

508-457-2315

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Block Island Sound
                  - Rhode Island

View All **