alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.2

                       CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER

                                       OF

                         TIPPINGPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                            (a Delaware corporation)

                                      INTO

                                NETPLIANCE, INC.

                            (a Delaware corporation)

     It is hereby certified that:

     1.   Netpliance, Inc., hereinafter sometimes referred to as the
"Corporation," is a corporation of the State of Delaware.

     2.   The Corporation is the owner of all of the outstanding shares of the
common stock of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc., which is also a corporation of
the State of Delaware.

     3.   On August 9, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted
the following resolutions to merge TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. into the
Corporation:

          RESOLVED that TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. be merged into this
          Corporation, and that all of the estate, property,rights, privileges,
          powers and franchises of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. be vested in
          and held and enjoyed by this Corporation as fully and entirely and
          without change or diminution as the same were before held and enjoyed
          by TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. in its name.

          RESOLVED that this Corporation shall assume all of the obligations of
          TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.

          RESOLVED that this Corporation shall cause to be executed and filed
          and/or recorded the documents prescribed by the laws of the State of
          Delaware and by the laws of any other appropriate jurisdiction and
          will cause to be performed all necessary acts within the State of
          Delaware and within any other appropriate jurisdiction.

          RESOLVED that this Corporation shall change its corporate name to
          TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.

                                       1

<PAGE>

     4.   The certificate of incorporation of the Corporation, is to be amended
and changed by reason of the merger herein certified by striking out Article 1,
thereof, relating to the name of said surviving corporation, and by substituting
in lieu thereof the following article:

          "1.  The name of the Corporation is TippingPoint Technologies, Inc."

     5.   The merger is to be effective at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on
August 20, 2001.


Executed on August 10, 2001.

                                    NETPLIANCE, INC.


                                    /s/ JAMES E. CAHILL
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    By: James E. Cahill, Vice President and
                                        General Counsel

                                       2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Cenuco, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Todd Smith, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


 Date: November 17, 2003

 /S/ Todd Smith
 -----------------------
 Todd Smith,
 Principal Financial Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00124- CV

Det ran Levy, Appellan t

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. AG 07- 0012 50, H ONO RAB LE SCO TT H . JENK INS, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Detra

n L evy appea ls the district court’s final order appointin g a non-par ent
as manag ing conser

vator for his daug hter and appointing him possessory conser vator with standard
v i s i t ation rig hts. Appellant’s court-a ppointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appea l i s frivolous and without merit. See Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 107.013 (West 2008) (stating that indige nt pare nt is entitl ed to appointed counsel in pr ocee dings by g overnme ntal entity seeking to terminate the pare nt-child rela tionship or seeking appointment as temporar y manag ing conser

vator). The brief meets the require ments of Anders v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by prese nting a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord and demonstrati n g why there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed on appea l. See In re L.K.H. , No. 11-10-00080 -C V, 2 010 WL 3621840, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland Sept. 16, 2010) (aba tement order , not rele ased for publication) (apply i n g A n der

s in appea l from order appointing Texas Depa rtment of Family and Protective Service s as perma nent manag ingconser

vator), motion granted , 2011 WL 846067, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland Mar. 10, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); cf. T

aylor v. T exas Dep’t of Prot ective & Regulatory Serv s. , 160 S.W .3d 641, 646-47 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied) (apply ing Anders proc edure in appea l from termination of pare ntal rig hts); In re K.S.M. , 61 S.W .3d 632, 634 (Tex. App.—Ty l er 2 0 0 1 , no pet.) (noting that whether proce eding is criminal or civil “make s no differ ence in the duties court-a ppointed counsel
owes his or her client”) ; In re A.W .T. , 61 S.W .3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.—Amar illo 2001, no pet.) (stating that “[t] he rationale underly ing Anders is no less applicable to a civil matter in which counsel has been appointed to repr esent the appellant” beca use it is p re m i s ed o n attorney ’s need to balanc e zealous repr esenta tion of client ag ainst prohibition ag ainst prosec uting meritless appea l). Counsel has cer tified to this Court that he provided appellant with a copy of the Anders brief and a notice of his right to examine the appe llate re cord a nd file a pr o se brief

. No pro se br ief ha s been f iled. We h a ve revie wed the rec ord and counsel’s brief and ag ree that the appea l is frivolou s and witho u t merit. Finding nothing in the record that might arg uably support an appeal, we g rant counsel’s motion to withdraw a nd aff irm the trial cour

t’s order
.

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Rose Affir med Filed: Jul y

12, 2012

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Maryland and the District of Columbia      

      January 1, 1977    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0795 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-53-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332C, L, and L1 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 6 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions are intended to detect deterioration of the MRH bearing and to 

prevent overloading the scissor links which drive the main rotor system, failure of the scissors 

links, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $20,000

Labor per Helicopter

(1 x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(60 x $85/work-hour for 

the replacement)

$85

$5,100

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 for the inspection

$25,100 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $510 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 31, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 31, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0102. MOCO-LLH SILAS, LLC v. GLM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

17CIVE0692
Case 21-13097-RAM Doc 7 Filed 03/31/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-13097-RAM Doc 7 Filed 03/31/21 Page 2 of 2
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 1, 2023.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00933

- CV

DENTISTRY AT ARTYSAN LANE PLLC , Appellant

V.

TEXAS INDEPENDENCE PLAZA LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 458th Dist rict Court Fort Bend County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22

- DCV

- 297421

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from an ord er signed D e cember 13, 20 2 2

. The notice of appeal was filed D e cember 27, 20 2 2

. To date, our records show that appellant has

no t paid t he a p pellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees
in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying

costs )

. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs).2 On April 26, 2023, appellee file d a m otion to dismiss for want of prosecution because appellant ha d not paid the appellate filing fee nor paid for the reporter ’ s re cord. On May 9, 2023 , this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate
fi ling fee on or before May 19 , 20 2 3 or the appeal w ould be subject to dismissal
without further notice. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order

. Accordingly, we grant appellee ’ s motion and dismiss the appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (c)

.
PER CURIAM

Pane l co n sists of Justices Jewell, Hassan, and Wilson.
Exhibit 12.2



Section 302 Certification



I, Wolfgang Breme certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of AIXTRON Aktiengesellschaft;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting;



5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: June 24, 2005



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     
|/s/    WOLFGANG
BREME
|Name:                 |  | Wolfgang Breme         
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM

DATE: July 2 8 , 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR

- 2013

- 0602

FROM: Jeremy Schreifels , EPA Office of Air and Radiation

SUBJECT: July 2 8 , 2015, meeting with Center for the New Energy Economy on registries for the

p roposed Clean Power Plan for e xisting sources

SUMMARY A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on July 2 8 , 2015 to discuss the external stakeholders’ interests in regis try syst ems to facilitate state

- level implementation of the Clean Power Plan

. The p roposed Clean Power Plan for e xisting power plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the F ederal Register on June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

External Stakeholders

D ennis Arfmann, Center for a New Energy Economy (CNEE) Jeff Lyng, CNEE Patrick Cummins, CNEE

EPA

A bby Fulton, EPA Region 8 Michael Heese, EPA HQ Jeremy Schreifels, EPA HQ
EXHIBIT-99.1









[ex991002.gif]







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby consent to the use of our report dated December 21, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Vault America, Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended, in the filing of the 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010, and for reference of the previously filed Form S-8.











/s/

Weaver & Martin, LLC

Kansas City, Missouri

December 23, 2010
| (1)   | The      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                          |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |                                                          |   |
| Dated:      October 29, 2010  |   | /s/ Bin      Liu                                         |   |
|                               |   | Bin      Liu                                                  |   |
|                               |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|                               |   |                                                          |   |

----
PACIFIC MONUMENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION


800 Third Avenue


New York, NY 10022







 


_______________, 2012


 





[Monument Capital Group SPAC I LLC]


[Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited]


 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Pacific Monument
Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the
Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the liquidation of the Company’s trust account (defined below) (in each
case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
[Monument Capital Group SPAC I LLC][Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited] shall make available to the Company certain
office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at [800 Third
Avenue, New York, New York 10022][14th Floor, Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7TP] (or any successor location). In exchange
therefore, the Company shall pay ProChannel [Monument Capital Group SPAC I LLC][Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited]
the sum of $4,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. [Monument Capital
Group SPAC I LLC][Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited] hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it
may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not
seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.













 





 


	 	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	 	PACIFIC MONUMENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 





[Monument Capital Group
SPAC I LLC]


[PACIFIC CAPITAL PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED]







 


 


	By:	 
	 	Name:
	 	Title:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           U.S. Geological Survey research on surrogate measurements for suspended sediment      

      January 1, 2003    

View Document

The U.S. Geological Survey is evaluating potentially useful surrogate instruments and methods for inferring the physical characteristics of suspended sediments. Instruments operating on bulk acoustic, bulk and digital optic, laser, and pressure-differential technologies are being tested in riverine and laboratory settings for their usefulness to Federal agencies toward providing quantifiably reliable information on bed-material and bed-topography characteristics, and on concentrations, size distributions and transport rates of sediments in suspension and as bedload. The efficacy of four suspended-sediment surrogate technologies has been demonstrated to varying degrees of success in Kansas, Florida, Arizona, and Puerto Rico. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Theodore "Teo" Melis, Ph.D.

##### Acting Center Director

Southwest Biological Science Center

tmelis@usgs.gov

928-556-7282

#### David J Topping, Ph.D.

##### Research Hydrologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

dtopping@usgs.gov

928-556-7396

## Related Content

#### Theodore "Teo" Melis, Ph.D.

##### Acting Center Director

Southwest Biological Science Center

tmelis@usgs.gov

928-556-7282

#### David J Topping, Ph.D.

##### Research Hydrologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

dtopping@usgs.gov

928-556-7396

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States;Puerto Rico
                  - Arizona;Florida;Kansas
                  - Arizona
                  - Florida
                  - kansas

View All **
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 3rd day of May, 2004.


                                            By:  /s/  Stephen M. Siedow
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Stephen M. Siedow,
                                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. and will be retained by MNS Eagle
Equity Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-54351; File No. SR-Amex-2006-44]

      ( print page 53492)    

### Correction

In notice document E6-14304 beginning on page 51245 in the issue of Tuesday, August 29, 2006, make the following correction:

On page 51255, in the second column, in the last two lines of the first full paragraph, “September 19, 2006” should read “September 13, 2006”.

[FR Doc. Z6-14304 Filed 9-8-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D