alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE 

TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

JOHN VINCENT CRUZ §

 § 

§ CAUSE NO. ______________ 

VS. § (APPELLATE CAUSE NO. 08-13-00297-CR

 § (TRIAL CAUSE NO. 20120D00741) 

STATE OF TEXAS § 

 

 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE 

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

NOW COMES, JOHN VINCENT CRUZ, APPELLANT/PETITIONER, by and 

through his Attorney of record, CHARLES LOUIS ROBERTS, and moves for an Extension of 

Time in which to file the PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, and for grounds 

Appellant/Petitioner would show this Court the following: 

I.

The following facts are required for this Motion: 

A. The P.D.R. is due December 11, 2015. 

B. A thirty (30) day extension is sought.

C. Counsel went to the 23rd Annual El Paso Criminal Law Seminar on November 20 and 

21, 2015 in Ruidoso, New Mexico. Counsel was also one of the speakers at the Seminar 

and had to prepare for his presentation. 

D. Counsel prepared for two Felony Trials, State v. David Lopez, Cause No. 20140D00401; 

and State of Texas v. Jesus Solis, Cause No. 20130D02293. 

E. No previous extensions have been granted. 

F. The court of Appeals was the Eighth Court of Appeals (El Paso, Texas).

PD-1320-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 12/4/2015 2:49:18 PM

Accepted 12/7/2015 1:34:46 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

G. The Opinion was delivered on August 05, 2015.

H. The Cause Number at the Court of Appeals was as follows:

John Vincent Cruz v. State, Cause No. 08-13-00297-CR

 I. A Motion for Rehearing was filed on October 26, 2015.

J. The Motion for Rehearing was denied on November 10, 2015.

II.

This extension is sought in the interest of Justice and not for the purpose of delay.

WHEREFORE, THE ABOVE PREMISES CONSIDERED,

Appellant/Petitioner asks this Court to grant an Extension of Time in which to file PETITION 

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW for thirty (30) days or until January 10, 2015.

 Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Charles L. Roberts /s/

 CHARLES L. ROBERTS

 300 E. Main, Suite 640

 State Bar. No. 1700100

 El Paso, Texas 79901

 (915) 532-9475

 (915) 534-7417 Fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned Attorney does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Motion has been e-served to the office of the District Attorney, 500 E. San Antonio,

2nd Floor, El Paso, Texas 79901 on this the 4th day of December, 2015.

 /s/ Charles L. Roberts /s/

 CHARLES L. ROBERTS 

 300 E. Main, Suite 640

 State Bar. No. 1700100

 El Paso, Texas 79901

 (915) 532-9475

 (915) 534-7417 Fax
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Recharge from a subsidence crater at the Nevada test site      

      January 1, 2000    

Current recharge through the alluvial fans of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) is considered to be negligible, but the impact of more than 400 nuclear subsidence craters on recharge is uncertain. Many of the craters contain a playa region, but the impact of these playas has not been addressed. It was hypothesized that a crater playa would focus infiltration through the surrounding coarser-grained material, thereby increasing recharge. Crater U5a was selected because it represented a worst case for runoff into craters. A borehole was instrumented for neutron logging beneath the playa center and immediately outside the crater. Physical and hydraulic properties were measured along a transect in the crater and outside the crater. Particle-size analysis of the 14.6 m of sediment in the crater and morphological features of the crater suggest that a large ponding event of ≈63000 m3 had occurred since crater formation. Water flow simulations with HYDRUS-2D, which were corroborated by the measured water contents, suggest that the wetting front advanced initially by as much as 30 m yr−1 with a recharge rate 32 yr after the event of 2.5 m yr−1Simulations based on the measured properties of the sediments suggest that infiltration will occur preferentially around the playa perimeter. However, these sediments were shown to effectively restrict future recharge by storing water until removal by evapotranspiration (ET). This work demonstrated that subsidence craters may be self-healing.

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Washington Water Science Center

934 BroadwaySuite 300Tacoma, WA98402United States

(253) 552-1600

(253) 552-1581
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Species decline: A perspective on extinction, recovery, and propagation      

      January 1, 1983    

View Document

This keynote address was presented at the Conference on the Conservation of Endangered Species in Zoological Parks and Aquariums on April 18, 1982 at the National Aquarium in Baltimore. It outlines 1) future trends in the world's environment, resources, and population; 2) factors affecting species decline; 3) reasons for preserving life forms; and 4) techniques, with emphasis on captive propagation, used to assist in species recovery.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Tsunami forecast by joint inversion of real-time tsunami waveforms and seismic of GPS data: application to the Tohoku 2011 tsunami      

      May 23, 2014    

Correctly characterizing tsunami source generation is the most critical component of modern tsunami forecasting. Although difficult to quantify directly, a tsunami source can be modeled via different methods using a variety of measurements from deep-ocean tsunameters, seismometers, GPS, and other advanced instruments, some of which in or near real time. Here we assess the performance of different source models for the destructive 11 March 2011 Japan tsunami using model–data comparison for the generation, propagation, and inundation in the near field of Japan. This comparative study of tsunami source models addresses the advantages and limitations of different real-time measurements with potential use in early tsunami warning in the near and far field. The study highlights the critical role of deep-ocean tsunami measurements and rapid validation of the approximate tsunami source for high-quality forecasting. We show that these tsunami measurements are compatible with other real-time geodetic data, and may provide more insightful understanding of tsunami generation from earthquakes, as well as from nonseismic processes such as submarine landslide failures.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Gavin P Hayes

##### Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards

Natural Hazards Mission Area

ghayes@usgs.gov

303-273-8421

## Related Content

#### Gavin P Hayes

##### Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards

Natural Hazards Mission Area

ghayes@usgs.gov

303-273-8421

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Japan
                  - honshu

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Use of a ground-penetrating radar system to detect pre- and post-flood scour at selected bridge sites in New Hampshire, 1996-98      

      January 1, 2000    

Ground-penetrating radar was used to measure the depth and extent of existing and infilled scour holes and previous scour surfaces at seven bridges in New Hampshire from April 1996 to November 1998. Ground-penetrating-radar survey techniques initially were used by the U.S. Geological Survey to study streambed scour at 30 bridges. Sixteen of the 30 bridges were re-surveyed where floods exceeded a 2-year recurrence interval. A 300-megahertz signal was used in the ground-penetrating radar system that penetrated through depths as great as 20 feet of water and as great as 32 feet of streambed materials. Existing scour-hole dimensions, infilled thickness, previous scour surfaces, and streambed materials were detected using ground-penetrating radar. Depths to riprap materials and pier footings were identified and verified with bridge plans. Post data-collection-processing techniques were applied to assist in the interpretation of the data, and the processed data were displayed and printed as line plots. Processing included distance normalization, migration, and filtering but processing was kept to a minimum and some interference from multiple reflections was left in the record. Of the 16 post-flood bridges, 22 ground-penetrating-radar cross sections at 7 bridges were compared and presented in this report. Existing scour holes were detected during 1996 (pre-flood) data collection in nine cross sections where scour depths ranged from 1 to 3 feet. New scour holes were detected during 1998 (post-flood) data collection in four cross sections where scour depths were as great as 4 feet deep. Infilled scour holes were detected in seven cross sections, where depths of infilling ranged from less than 1 to 4 feet. Depth of infilling by means of steel rod and hammer was difficult to verify in the field because of cobble and boulder streambeds or deep water. Previous scour surfaces in streambed materials were identified in 15 cross sections and the depths to these surfaces ranged from 1 to 10 feet below the streambed. Riprap materials or pier footings were identified in all cross sections. Calculated record depths generally agree with bridge plans. Pier footings were exposed at two bridges and steel pile was exposed at one bridge. Exposures were verified by field observations.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - New Hampshire

View All **
Exhibit "E"

Case 20-13363-PGH    Doc 10-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 1 of 4

Case 20-13363-PGH    Doc 10-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 2 of 4

Case 20-13363-PGH    Doc 10-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 3 of 4

Case 20-13363-PGH    Doc 10-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 4 of 4
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS:

RESIDENTIAL CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS

Including:

Regulatory Impact Analysis

July 2001

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary,

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

Office of Building Research and Standards

Washington, DC 20585

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 241ZZ
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Arthur D. Little, Inc.

and

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Energy Analysis Department

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 241ZZ
+ 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION 

In re: JAVIER MORZAN 

 Case No.: 20-18765-LMI 

 Chapter 7 

Debtor(s). 

___________________________ 

SUPPLEMENTAL FEE DISCLOSURE AND CERIFICATION OF SERVICE OF ORIGINAL 

REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT ON CREDITOR 

 Counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329 and 

Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, hereby files this Supplemental Fee 

Disclosure and Certification that Reaffirmation Agreement was mailed PNC Bank, NA on 

August 26, 2020. 

 1. The Debtor has requested and believes that the following services, which are not 

contemplated by the original fee agreement between the Debtor and the attorney for the Debtor, 

are reasonable and necessary: Request, transmittal, review, negotiate and execution of 

reaffirmation agreement with the following: PNC Bank, NA. 

2. For these services, counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., has 

received a fee of $150.00 and costs of $00.00. Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has not agreed to share 

the above – disclosed compensation with person(s) who are not members or associates of 

Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. 

3. Timothy S. Kingcade certifies that the executed reaffirmation agreement with 

PNC Bank, NA. was mailed to PNC Bank, NA, POB 94982, Cleveland, OH 44101-4982 on 

August 26, 2020. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent, via CM/ 

ECF, on August 26, 2020 to the Assistant United States Trustee. 

Case 20-18765-LMI Doc 12 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 9011-4(B) 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I 

am admitted to the Bar of the 

United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Florida 

and I am in compliance with the 

additional qualifications to 

practice in this Court set forth in 

Local Rule 2090-1(A). 

KINGCADE & GARCIA, P.A 

Counsel for the Debtor 

Kingcade Building 

1370 Coral Way ▪ Miami, Florida 33145-2960 

WWW.MIAMIBANKRUPTCY.COM

Telephone: 305-285-9100 ▪ Facsimile: 305-

285-9542 

/S/Timothy S. Kingcade_______ 

X Timothy S. Kingcade, Esq., FBN 082309 

□ Wendy Garcia, Esq., FBN 0865478 

□ Jessica L. McMaken, Esq., FBN 580163

Case 20-18765-LMI Doc 12 Filed 08/26/20 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

PERFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY SPC Chapter 15

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. Case No.: 21-12609-AJC

________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AUTHORIZE DISTRIBUTION OF 

ESTATE FUNDS HELD IN THE UNITED STATES TO THE CAYMAN ISLANDS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on November 10, 2022, (the “Hearing”) upon the 

Motion to Authorize the Distribution of Estate Funds Held in the United States to the Cayman 

Islands (the “Motion”) [DE 56] filed by Kenneth Krys and Neil Dempsey (the “Foreign 

Representatives”), the Official Joint Liquidators of Performance Insurance Company SPC and ten 

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 10, 2022.

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 64 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 2
2

of its twelve segregated portfolios1(collectively, the “Debtor”). The Court has considered the 

Motion, the record, and arguments of counsel for the Foreign Representatives and Lexington 

Insurance at the Hearing, the Court finds that the interests of the Debtor’s U.S. creditors are 

sufficiently protected under the Debtor’s Cayman Liquidation. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The Motion is GRANTED as set forth below.

2. The Foreign Representatives are authorized and entrusted with the distribution of

the funds in the United States bank accounts of segregated portfolio Omega Insurance Company 

SP, to such accounts in the Cayman Islands as specified by the Foreign Representatives. 

3. For avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Order is intended to provide relief with 

respect to Goldenstar Holdings Company SP, one of the Debtor’s segregated portfolios, or its 

assets.

###

Submitted by:

Gregory S. Grossman, Esq.

Juan J. Mendoza, Esq.

SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1250

Miami, Florida 33131

ggrossman@sequorlaw.com

jmendoza@sequorlaw.com

Telephone: (305) 372-8282

(Juan J. Mendoza is directed to serve a copy of this order upon all interested parties who do not 

receive service by CM/ECF and file a proof of service within three days of entry of this order)

 

1

 The Debtor’s segregated portfolios are: (i) Bottini Insurance SP; (ii) Gen 1 Insurance Company SP; 

(iii) Goldenstar Holdings Company SP; (iv) Greystone Insurance SP; (v) Hudson York Insurance Company 

SP; (vi) Omega Insurance Company SP; (vii) Performance 5 SP; (viii) Prewett Insurance Company SP; (ix) 

Smart Insure SP; (x) SSS Insurance SP; (xi) Sustainable Insurance Company SP; and (xii) Triangle RGK 

SP. These twelve segregated portfolios are hereinafter referred to as the “Segregated Portfolios.” The 

Foreign Representatives are the Official Joint Liquidators for all segregated portfolios but not for Bottini 

Insurance SP and SSS Insurance SP. 

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 64 Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 2
Reginald T. JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4687

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary report on seismic-reflection studies of crustal structure in the western, central, and southern United States      

      January 1, 1963    

View Document

During 1963 the U.S. Geological Survey, with the assistance of United ElectroDynamics, Inc., recorded five separate reversed seismic profiles. In addition to these profiles, the U.S. Geological Survey participated in a seismic-calibration program for the DRIBBLE experiment at Tatum Dome, Mississippi, a 20,000-pound shot near Dexter, Missouri, and in a cooperative seismic experiment in the Lake Superior region. This work is a continuation of the program started in 1961; however, the emphasis has shifted from a detailed study of the earth's crust in the western United States to a study of crustal structure in various geologic environments including the Wyoming thrust belt, Colorado Plateau, Central Lowlands, the Gulf Coastal Plain, and the southern part of the Canadian Shield. The U.S. Geological Survey has now completed reversed seismic-refraction profiles in nine different geologic provinces. These data present a promising indication that it may be possible to predict the crustal structure in unexplored areas by considering the regional geologic and physiographic environment. The following Pn velocities have been determined: 8.2 km/sec in the Wyoming thrust belt, 7.9 km/sec in the Colorado Plateau, 8.1 km/sec in the Central Lowlands, and about 8.2 km/sec in the Gulf Coastal Plain. The data from the Lake Superior region have not yet been interpreted.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona;Idaho;Mississippi;Missouri;Utah
                  - Arizona
                  - Idaho
                  - mississippi
                  - missouri
                  - Utah

View All **
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to therequirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Paul L. Berns, the President and Chief Executive Officer of AllosTherapeutics, Inc., and David C. Clark, the Corporate Controller and Treasurerof Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:

1.     The Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.     The information contained inthe Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 3,2006
|        | /s/ Paul L. Berns                             |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul L. Berns                                 |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer        |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer)                |
|   |                                          |
|   |                                          |
|   | /s/ David C. Clark                            |   |
|   | David C. Clark                                |
|   | Corporate Controller  and Treasurer           |
|   | (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed originalof this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsStaff upon request. This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which itrelates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectiveof any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Luisa M Fernandez Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 750.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 750.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. $ 0.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

June 29, 2020 /s/ ALEXIS GARCIA

Date ALEXIS GARCIA

Signature of Attorney

Prada Law

1450 NW 87 Avenue

Suite 210

Doral, FL 33172

3052031059 Fax: 7865134627

agrcia@prada.law

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-17105-AJC Doc 5 Filed 06/29/20 Page 1 of 1