alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, James K. Bass certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Suntron Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                     /s/ James K. Bass   James K. Bass  Date: April 6, 2005 *President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 11953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10313]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 11953]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Farm Service Agency
Rural Housing Service
Rural-Cooperative Service
Rural Utilities Service

7 CFR Parts 1910, 1941, 1943, 1945, and 1980

RIN 0560-AE87


Implementation of the Direct and Guaranteed Loan Making 
Provisions of the Federal Agricultural Improvement Act of 1996

Correction

    In interim rule document 97-4840, beginning on page 9351 in the 
issue of Monday, March 3, 1997, make the following corrections:


Sec. 1945.469  [Corrected]

    1. On page 9357, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 
33., in the second line ``(1)'' should read ``(l)''.
    2. On page 9357, in the second column, in Sec. 1945.469, the 
paragraph designation ``(1)'' should read ``(l)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
D.P.G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GIFT OF LIFE ADOPTIONS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3918

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 02, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Harold Max POMPEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Harold Max Pompee, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TIMOTHY AND DEBRA CLARKE, H/W
v. MMG INSURANCE COMPANY AND F. FREDERICK BREUNINGER & SON INSURANCE, INC. PETITION OF: MMG INSURANCE COMPANY : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 588 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 28th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 59386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 600 and 606

[Docket No. 97N-0242]


Biological Products; Reporting of Errors and Accidents in 
Manufacturing

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-25129 beginning on page 49642, in the 
issue of Tuesday, September 23, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 49642, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
last line, ``March 23, 1998.'' should read ``180 days after its date of 
publication in the Federal Register.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(9)

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-123513, No. 333-134045 and
No. 333-165495 on Form S-8 of our reports relating to the consolidated financial statements of AIXTRON SE and the effectiveness of AIXTRON SE's internal control over
financial reporting dated February 28, 2011, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of AIXTRON SE for the year ended December 31, 2010.

---

/s/ Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft


Deloitte &
Touche GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Düsseldorf, Germany
February 28, 2011

---



QuickLinks
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

# R CEIVED JAN 27 2015 HEARING DOCKET
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0682 MIAMI TECH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE, INC. FAA CASE NO. 2010S0190295 Judge I.E. Sullivan Respondent

Joint Section 13.217/Rule 26(£) Report
1. The parties have agreed to and recommend the following discovery plan:
a. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) by Friday, January 30, 2015; b. Initial discovery requests will be made by Friday, Janumy 30, 2015. The pmiies will have until February 27, 2014, to respond to initial discovery requests;
c. Follow-up discovery requests will be made by Friday, March 13, 2015. The pmiies have until Monday, April 13, 2015, to respond to follow-up discovery requests; d. All dispositive motions must be filed by Thursday, April 30, 2015; responses thereto by Wednesday, May 20, 2015; replies by Friday June 5, 2015;
e. Thehearing should be held in Miramm I Mimui area. Respectively submitted this 6th day ofJanuary, 2015.Is! William Vines !vir. William Vines Complainant's Counsel General Attorney Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 Ph: 404-305-5200 Email: William. Vines(cl!faa.gov Is/Juan R. Serrano.
____ _ Juan R. Senano, Esq. Respondent's Counsel Griffin, Senano & Ewing, PA 707 SE 3rd Ave. 6th Floor F

mi Lauderdale, FL 3 3316 Ph: 954-462-4002 Email: jserrano(Glgriffinserrano.corn service(cl!griffinserrano.corn

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby ccriify that the foregoing Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report was sent the following as follows:
Federal Aviation Administration (by regular mail only
____ __:____} 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan Administrative Law Judge Offlce ofHearings, M-20, Room El2-320 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536

01/06/2015
____ _ Dated (by facsimile
____ _ )**'~-~~** GRIFFIN 

### & SERRANO, 

## P.A. Attorneys at Law Landmark Building, Sixth Floor

707 Southeast 3rd Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 fl'I!IAi'tD !Rl. 3311 '.UQ' .:Ill'!W'li ''.1!5 2,-tL



### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, 

### u.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite W1000**~!DSS.;i** i 0004 i 1 

### if' 

## iiii';jpi

### •J

## iiJ 1 i'jii

### 'iii ii';j iII iI'illIIi I'

### •;I ij'l'iiiii''i
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Local tsunamis and distributed slip at the source      

      January 1, 1999    

Variations in the local tsunami wave field are examined in relation to heterogeneous slip distributions that are characteristic of many shallow subduction zone earthquakes. Assumptions inherent in calculating the coseismic vertical displacement field that defines the initial condition for tsunami propagation are examined. By comparing the seafloor displacement from uniform slip to that from an ideal static crack, we demonstrate that dip-directed slip variations significantly affect the initial cross-sectional wave profile. Because of the hydrodynamic stability of tsunami wave forms, these effects directly impact estimates of maximum runup from the local tsunami. In most cases, an assumption of uniform slip in the dip direction significantly underestimates the maximum amplitude and leading wave steepness of the local tsunami. Whereas dip-directed slip variations affect the initial wave profile, strike-directed slip variations result in wavefront-parallel changes in amplitude that are largely preserved during propagation from the source region toward shore, owing to the effects of refraction. Tests of discretizing slip distributions indicate that small fault surface elements of dimensions similar to the source depth can acceptably approximate the vertical displacement field in comparison to continuous slip distributions. Crack models for tsunamis generated by shallow subduction zone earthquakes indicate that a rupture intersecting the free surface results in approximately twice the average slip. Therefore, the observation of higher slip associated with tsunami earthquakes relative to typical subduction zone earthquakes of the same magnitude suggests that tsunami earthquakes involve rupture of the seafloor, whereas rupture of deeper subduction zone earthquakes may be imbedded and not reach the seafloor.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

## Related Content

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

### Contacts

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457
26 August 2014

DOH/EPA Request for Additional Information of 01 August 2014

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility

Questions 9 through 12, (DOH/EPA Request 1c.):  Describe all monitoring efforts from 2009‐present of

groundwater and/or drinking water. Provide any supporting documents (including monitoring data,

sampling methods, and analytical methods exercised).

Response:  In general, fuel product monitoring has been conducted at wells RHMW01, RHMW02, and

RHMW03 monthly since January 2009.  Fuel product monitoring has been conducted at well RHMW05

since July 2009, following completion of the well installation.  Results of the monthly oil/water interface

measurements have been submitted to the DOH, as shown on the list of regulatory correspondence.  

(Results of the January, February, and March 2009 measurements are included in the Quarterly

[February 2009] Groundwater Monitoring Report.)

In general, groundwater samples from wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05, OWDFMW01,

HDMW2253‐03, and sampling point RHMW2254‐01 (Red Hill Shaft) have been collected and analyzed

quarterly.  Four quarterly samples were collected from well RHMW04 from August 2009 through April

2010.  Due to the non‐detect analytical results, and with concurrence from the DOH, no additional

samples were collected from RHMW04 until July 2014.

Monitoring data was submitted to the DOH as shown on the list of regulatory correspondence.  

Sampling methods and analytical methods that were exercised were described in the following

documents:  

 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports

 Groundwater Protection Plan of January 2008, revised December 2009

 Work Plan, Long‐Term Monitoring of September 2010

 Work Plan/ Sampling and Analysis Plan, Long‐Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring of

October 2012

Note: Drinking water monitoring information will be provided separately.
STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. William ROSE, Sr., Appellant

No. 51,478-KA

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Judgment rendered June 27, 2018

LOUISIANA APPELLATE PROJECT, By: Annette F. Roach, Counsel for Appellant

ROBERT S. TEW, District Attorney, MICHELLE ANDERSON THOMPSON, Assistant District Attorney, Counsel for Appellee

Before MOORE, PITMAN, and COX, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On July 7, 2016, the defendant, William Rose, Sr., pled guilty to driving while intoxicated, fourth-offense. On September 7, 2016, he was sentenced to serve 22 years at hard labor. The defendant appealed his conviction and sentence to this court.

On August 9, 2017, this court stayed the appeal and remanded the case for an additional *Boykin* hearing.

*1237On May 25, 2018, during the pendency of his appeal, the defendant died. Defendant's counsel filed a motion to vacate the defendant's judgment of conviction and abate all proceedings in this prosecution from their inception.

The previously-issued stay is hereby lifted; and, in accordance with *State v. Harvey* , 94-0343 (La. 10/20/94), 644 So.2d 371 ; *State v. Thom* , 438 So.2d 208 (La. 1983) ; and *State v. Hamilton* , 370 So.2d 874 (La. 1979) ; the judgment of conviction is vacated, and all proceedings in this prosecution are abated from their inception.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 11, 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00054

- CV

A. B. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JU STIC ES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the ord er terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on

January 17, 2023

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds

that there was no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s

termi nati o n order

. Bec ause a ppellant is indigent and unable to pay costs , no adjudication of

co sts is made.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: JULIO C. CHIRINO CASE NUMBER: 20-22980-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for June 22, 2021 hearing. All amendments and documents for the June 22, 2021

hearing were due as of June 4, 2021. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

5AP served 3/30

If counsel for the debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

If Motion Granted, Confirm 5A Plan, if not, Cont. to 7/27

Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 67 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41240 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAUL CALZADIAS, also known as Robert Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-217

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Calzadias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Calzadias has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10814]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 43581]]



DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1910

RIN 1218-AA95


Methylene Chloride; Approval of Information Collection 
Requirements; Extension of Start-up Dates

Correction

    In rule document 97-20890 beginning on page 42666 in the issue of 
Friday, August 8, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 1910.8  [Corrected]

    On page 42666, in the third column, in amendatory instruction 2., 
in the second line, ``1910.52***1218-0179'' should read 
``1910.1052......1218-0179''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Christina PAYLAN, M. D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2852

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
David KRAUS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SHELBORNE OCEAN BEACH HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2143

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

61585

Vol. 62, No. 222

Tuesday, November 18, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-024-5440-A015; AZA 25918; AZA 17969;

AZA 18069]

Notice of Termination of Classification

and Airport Application

Correction

In notice document 97–28069

beginning on page 55275 in the issue of

Thursday, October 23, 1997, the subject

heading is corrected to read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 870

RIN 1029-AB93

Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation

Fund Reauthorization Implementation

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–23958,

beginning on page 47617, in the issue of

Wednesday, September 10, 1997, make

the following correction:

On page 47618, in the second column,

under the heading Discussion of

Proposed Rule, in the first line ‘‘not’’

and ‘‘move’’ should read ‘‘now’’ and

‘‘remove’’, respectively.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 10

[CGD 94-055]

RIN 2115-AF23

Licensing and Manning for Officers of

Towing Vessels

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–28409,

beginning on page 55548, in the issue of

Monday, October 27, 1997 make the

following correction:

§ 10.466 [Corrected]

On page 55560, in the third column,

in §10.466(b)(3), ‘‘the’’ should read ‘‘a

limited’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Arkansas Regional Haze SIP submitted to EPA on September 23, 2008, with supplemental 

information submitted on September 27, 2011: 

Available in docket #: EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0727
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 2****CONSENT OF GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.**We hereby consent to the reference to us in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Pengrowth EnergyTrust and all other references to my name included or incorporated by reference in: (i) PengrowthEnergy Trust’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 and (ii) theRegistration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-143810) and the Registration Statement on FormF-10 (File No. 333-146928), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, asamended as applicable.     Date:March 19, 2008    Calgary, Alberta /s/ Doug R. Sutton GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.