alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     172,633,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,676,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,014,436
<INVENTORY>                                  2,578,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           185,649,018
<PP&E>                                     200,330,212
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,808,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             412,984,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,526,146
<BONDS>                                    207,351,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       613,548
<OTHER-SE>                                 245,953,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               412,984,498
<SALES>                                      2,228,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,983,099
<CGS>                                        4,604,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,523,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,080,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (6,961,479)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,470,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,470,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,470,158)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
TED K. BROWN,

Petitioner,

v.

VALERIE BROWN,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2048

Opinion filed July 11, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Ted K. Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Robin E. Lanigan, Jacksonville, and Jeanine B. Sasser, Jacksonville, for 

Respondent (no appearances).

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

7506

Vol. 63, No. 30

Friday, February 13, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Civil

Penalties

Correction

In notice document 98–2193,

beginning on page 5401, in the issue of

Monday, February 2, 1998, make the

following corrections:

On page 5402, in the table, in the

third column, in the third line, ‘‘(10/’’

should be moved to the next line.

On the same page, in the same

column, in the fourth line, ‘‘440,500’’

should read ‘‘40,500.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 Certification  (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

---

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of AIXTRON Aktiengesellschaft (the "Company") as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on or about the date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned, in the capacity set forth below, hereby certifies, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|                     |  | /s/PAUL HYLAND                                                      | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:
Title:         |  | Paul Hyland President and Chief Executive Officer                   | 
|                     |  | /s/WOLFGANG BREME                                                   | 
|Name:
Title:         |  | Wolfgang Breme Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: March 13, 2008 | 

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting each of the signatures appearing in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company in accordance with the applicable provisions of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the related rules and regulations.

This written statement accompanies the Annual Report on Form 20-F in which it appears as an Exhibit pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other applicable law, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 99.2

CONSENT OF GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.



|TO: | Pengrowth Energy Corporation
|--- | ----------------------------

2100, 222-3 Avenue SW

Calgary, Alberta T2P OB4

We hereby consent to the reference to our name and report evaluating Pengrowth Energy Corporations petroleum and natural gas
reserves as of December 31, 2011 and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Pengrowth Energy Corporations Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (ii) the
Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File No. 333-171672) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-171682) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended as applicable.



Yours truly, 
GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.LOGODoug R. Sutton, P. Eng.
Executive Vice-President


Calgary, Alberta

February 28, 2012
Althea Smith ENGLAND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. LTD FAMILY TRUST, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4239

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

37084 

Vol. 72, No. 129 

Friday, July 6, 2007 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service 

[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0027] 

ArborGen, LLC; Availability of an 

Environmental Assessment and 

Finding of No Significant Impact for a 

Controlled Release of Genetically 

Engineered Eucalyptus Hybrids 

Correction 

In notice document E7–12532 

beginning on page 35215 in the issue of 

Wednesday, June 27, 2007, make the 

following correction: 

On page 35216 in the first column 

under DATES, ‘‘June 28, 2007’’ should 

read ‘‘June 27, 2007’’. 

*COM019*[FR Doc. Z7–12532 Filed 7–5–07; 

8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Exhibit 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, John R. Signorello, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of IceWEB, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer
    as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including
        its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
        those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
        being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectives of the issuer's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
        Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
        materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial
        reporting; and

5.  The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
    issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors
    (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record,
        process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
        over financial reporting.

/s/ John R. Signorello
----------------------
John R. Signorello
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: August 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 65739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 175

[CGD 85-080]
RIN 2115-AC 22


Small Passenger Vessel Inspection and Certification; Correction

Correction

    In rule document 97-31895, beginning on page 64303, in the issue of 
Friday, December 5, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 175.400  [Corrected]

    On page 64306, in the second column, in Sec. 175.400, in the 
definition of Wood vessel, in the sixth line, ``area'' should read 
``are''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-6764]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 26689]]



DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-144859-04]
RIN 1545-BD72


Section 1367 Regarding Open Account Debt

Correction

    In proposed rule document E7-6764 beginning on page 18417 in the 
issue of Thursday, April 12, 2007, make the following correction:


Sec.  1.1367-2  [Corrected]

    On page 18422, in Sec.  1.1367-2(e), in Example 7, in the table, in 
the last column, in the last entry, ``2,000'' should read ``$2,000''.

[FR Doc. Z7-6764 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Putting down roots in earthquake country: Your handbook for earthquakes in the Central United States      

      January 22, 2011    

View GIP 119

View GIP 119 (Screen Version)

This handbook provides information to residents of the Central United States about the threat of earthquakes in that area, particularly along the New Madrid seismic zone, and explains how to prepare for, survive, and recover from such events. It explains the need for concern about earthquakes for those residents and describes what one can expect during and after an earthquake. Much is known about the threat of earthquakes in the Central United States, including where they are likely to occur and what can be done to reduce losses from future earthquakes, but not enough has been done to prepare for future earthquakes. The handbook describes such preparations that can be taken by individual residents before an earthquake to be safe and protect property.

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alabama
                  -  Arkansas
                  -  Illinois
                  -  Indiana
                  -  Kentucky
                  -  Mississippi
                  -  Missouri
                  -  Tennessee

View All **
ex10-13.htm



Exhibit 10.13


 




Ixia


Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Members


of the Board of Directors and its Committees


 



	1.	 	
Board of Directors

	 	 	 
	 	 	
Quarterly retainer (except Chairman)

	 	$	8,750	 
	 	 	
Chairman’s quarterly retainer

	 	$	0	 
	 	 	
Fee for attending a meeting

	 	$	0	 
	 	 	  	 	 	 	 
	2.	 	
Compensation Committee

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
Quarterly retainer (except Chairman)

	 	$	2,250	 
	 	 	
Chairman’s quarterly retainer

	 	$	4,750	 
	 	 	
Fee for attending a meeting

	 	$	0	 
	 	 	  	 	 	 	 
	3.	 	
Audit Committee

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
Quarterly retainer (except Chairman)

	 	$	2,500	 
	 	 	
Chairman’s quarterly retainer

	 	$	5,875	 
	 	 	
Fee for attending a meeting

	 	$	0	 
	 	 	  	 	 	 	 
	4.	 	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
Annual retainer (except Chairman)

	 	$	0	 
	 	 	
Chairman’s annual retainer

	 	$	0	 
	 	 	
Fee for attending a meeting

	 	$	1,500	 










The above summarizes cash compensation payable to the non-employee directors of the Company’s Board of Directors and its Committees effective as of April 1, 2011.


 


In addition to cash compensation, non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of stock options, restricted stock units and other equity incentives under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2008 Plan”).  The 2008 Plan is included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-31523) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on filed with the Commission on May 25, 2011.


 


*     *     *
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00669-CR

NO. 03-19-00670-CR

NO. 03-19-00671-CR

NO. 03-19-00672-CR

NO. 03-19-00673-CR

NO. 03-19-00674-CR

NO. 03-19-00675-CR

NO. 03-19-00676-CR

NO. 03-19-00677-CR

NO. 03-19-00678-CR

NO. 03-19-00679-CR

NO. 03-19-00680-CR

NO. 03-19-00681-CR

Ira Richard Thrasher, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF MILAM COUNTY 

NOS. CR35714, CR35715, CR35716, CR35717, CR35718, CR35719,

CR35720, CR35721, CR35722, CR35723, CR35724, CR35725, CR35726

THE HONORABLE STEVE YOUNG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The clerk’s records in these appeals were due for filing in this Court on

October 21, 2019. On February 7, 2020, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been 

filed due to his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record in each of these appeals. The notice for each appeal requested that appellant make 
2

arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding the appeal by 

February 18, 2020. Further, the notices advised appellant that his failure to comply with this 

request could result in the dismissal of each appeal for want of prosecution. In each appeal, the 

notice was returned to sender as “not deliverable as addressed” and “unable to forward.” To 

date, appellant has not updated his address with the Court, and the clerk’s records have not 

been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to 

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court 

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In these cases, appellant has not established 

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because 

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record in each appeal, these appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 3, 2020
Willie D'Andre TRIPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2834

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

d0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140349(67)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140349 COA: 286046 Mason CC: 07-001876-FC WILLIAM FRANCIS COCKREAM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 31, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
## 31 1

# Cf 25-0 I,02t03, W,CYs,cw J Rodolfo Garcia 768418 LH.l098 S.HWY 2037 Ft.Stockton,TX.79735

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas P.O.BOX l2308,Capitol Station, Austin,Texas 78711 August 10,2015
The State of Texas Vs.Rodolfo Garcia.Cause No.2154 and 2156. RE: Request for Court Events and dates.

Dear Court of Criminal Appeals Clerk; I would like to obtain dates and write numbers approximate and howmany 11.07 I have filed in your court.My District court are refusing to provid me with this information that is why I am requesting to you with all. the events that I have filed before in this Court and the numbers of the writes,please. Thank you and I appreciated for your time.

Sincerely yours,
Garcia,R.i768418 SIDi02559852 LH.l098 S.HWY 2037 Ft.stockton,TX79735**~r:r::Q·,, tr=~r\** **v~-a ~**  L.c**~~· L~~~·~**  ;J**~!;.:~** 

## U y**l~** ';.fJ 

### COUHT OF
. 1**l\PPS~.t,:;** 

## AUG 14 

## 2015

CC:File lEqESt :fir <ll.rt Em1ts alrl ffita3; ()/, tJgf**C)~t** I (0
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 156 (Thursday, August 13, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FRL-6131-6]
RIN 2060-ZA02


Promulgation of Federal Implementation Plan for Arizona-- Phoenix 
PM-10 Moderate Area; Disapproval of State Implementation Plan for 
Arizona-- Phoenix PM-10 Moderate Area

Correction

    In rule document 98-20147 beginning on page 41326, in the issue of 
Monday, August 3, 1998, make the following correction:


Appendix A to Sec. 52.128  [Corrected]

    1. On page 41355, in the third column, in Table 1, under ``TFV'', 
in the first line, ``<ls-thn-eq>100'' should read ``>100''.
    2. On page 41356, in the third column, in the 18th line, after 
``this'' insert ``Appendix''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Stress transferred by the 1995 Mw = 6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities      

      January 1, 1998    

The Kobe earthquake struck at the edge of the densely populated Osaka-Kyoto corridor in southwest Japan. We investigate how the earthquake transferred stress to nearby faults, altering their proximity to failure and thus changing earthquake probabilities. We find that relative to the pre-Kobe seismicity, Kobe aftershocks were concentrated in regions of calculated Coulomb stress increase and less common in regions of stress decrease. We quantify this relationship by forming the spatial correlation between the seismicity rate change and the Coulomb stress change. The correlation is significant for stress changes greater than 0.2-1.0 bars (0.02-0.1 MPa), and the nonlinear dependence of seismicity rate change on stress change is compatible with a state- and rate-dependent formulation for earthquake occurrence. We extend this analysis to future mainshocks by resolving the stress changes on major faults within 100 km of Kobe and calculating the change in probability caused by these stress changes. Transient effects of the stress changes are incorporated by the state-dependent constitutive relation, which amplifies the permanent stress changes during the aftershock period. Earthquake probability framed in this manner is highly time-dependent, much more so than is assumed in current practice. Because the probabilities depend on several poorly known parameters of the major faults, we estimate uncertainties of the probabilities by Monte Carlo simulation. This enables us to include uncertainties on the elapsed time since the last earthquake, the repeat time and its variability, and the period of aftershock decay. We estimate that a calculated 3-bar (0.3-MPa) stress increase on the eastern section of the Arima-Takatsuki Tectonic Line (ATTL) near Kyoto causes fivefold increase in the 30-year probability of a subsequent large earthquake near Kyoto; a 2-bar (0.2-MPa) stress decrease on the western section of the ATTL results in a reduction in probability by a factor of 140 to 2000. The probability of a Mw = 6.9 earthquake within 50 km of Osaka during 1997-2007 is estimated to have risen from 5-6% before the Kobe earthquake to 7-11% afterward; during 1997-2027, it is estimated to have risen from 14-16% before Kobe to 16-22%.

## Citation Information