alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form CGFCRD3Z (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−20622−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re:

Samuel Fitzgerald Worrell

7420 NW 41 Court

Lauderhill, FL 33319

SSN: xxx−xx−3980

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Peter D. Russin to consider the

following:

Motion for Relief from Stay [Fee Amount $188] Filed by Creditor NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT

MORTGAGE SERVICING (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A" # 2 Main Document) (Harriott, April) (26)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: February 7, 2022

Time: 01:00 PM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although

conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom

must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct

themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day

before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimENeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 1/20/22 CLERK OF COURT

By: Christina Romero

Courtroom Deputy

Case 21-20622-PDR Doc 27 Filed 01/20/22 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.
Exhibit 31-2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, V. Lewis Shuler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of First South  Bancorp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with respect to the period  covered by this  report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods  presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant, and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter( the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting, and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors and to the audit committee of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

                                 s/V. Lewis Shuler
Dated:   November 14, 2007       ------------------------------------------
                                 V. Lewis Shuler
                                 Exec. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Rocky Mountain Snowpack Chemistry at Selected Sites, 2004      

      January 1, 2007    

During spring 2004, the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the National Park Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service collected and analyzed snowpack samples for 65 sites in the Rocky Mountain region from New Mexico to Montana. Snowpacks were sampled from late February through early April and generally had well-below-average- to near-average snow-water equivalent. Regionally, on April 1, snow-water equivalent ranged from 50 to 89 percent.

At most regional sites monitored during 1993-2004, snowpack ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate concentrations for 2004 were lower than the 12-year averages. Snowpack ammonium concentrations in the region were lower than average concentrations for the period at 61 percent of sites in the region, but showed a new pattern compared to previous years with three of the four highest 2004 concentrations observed in northern Colorado. Nitrate concentrations in 2004 were lower than the 12-year average for the year at 53 percent of regional sites, and typically occurred at sites in Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana where powerplants and large industrial areas were limited. A regional decrease in sulfate concentrations across most of the Rocky Mountains (with concentrations lower than the 12-year average at 84 percent of snowpack sites) was consistent with other monitoring of atmospheric deposition in the Western United States. Total mercury concentrations, although data are only available for the past 3 years, decreased slightly for the region as a whole in 2004 relative to 2003. Ratios of stable sulfur isotopes indicated a similar regional pattern as observed in recent years with sulfur-34 (d34S) values generally increasing northward from northern New Mexico and southern Colorado to northern Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

## Related Content

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

### Explore Search

                  - Water

View All **
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 8, 2007 |     |     |
|-------------------------|----------|----------|
|                    |     |     |
|                    |     |     |
|                    |     | BY:      | /s/ NICHOLAS DISCOMBE |   |
|                    |     |     | Nicholas Discombe |
|                    |     |     | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                    | * * | * * |
|                    | * * | * * |
| Dated: May 8, 2007 |     |     |
|                    |     |     |
|                    |     |     |
|                    |     | BY:      | /s/ WILLIAM F. EVANS |   |
|                    |     |     | William F. Evans |
|                    |     |     | *Chief Financial Officer* |
|                         |          |          |  |  |  |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc.and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Curtis OVLETREA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-898

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) for the quarterly period endedMarch  31,  2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Gary D. Forsee, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/   Gary D.Forsee            

Name: Gary D.ForseeTitle:   Chief ExecutiveOfficerDate:   May 15, 2006

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mass balance of two perennial snowfields: Niwot Ridge, Colorado and the Ulaan Taiga, Mongolia.      

      March 23, 2022    

Perennial snowfields are generally receding worldwide, though the precise mechanisms causing recessions are not always well understood. Here we apply a numerical snowpack model to identify the leading factors controlling the mass balance of two perennial snowfields that have significant human interest: Arapaho glacier, located at Niwot Ridge in the Colorado Rocky Mountains (United States), and a snowfield located in the Ulaan Taiga (Mongolia). The two locations were chosen because they differ in elevation, slope and aspect. However, both have sub-arctic climates and are located within semi-arid regions. We show that for these two locations the snowfield mass balance is primarily sensitive to air temperature and wind speed, followed by precipitation and dust deposition amounts. We find that the sensitivities are similar for the center of the snowfield as well as the margins.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kaj Williams, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

kewilliams@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Kaj Williams, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

kewilliams@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Earth
                  - Modeling
                  - Research
                  - Atmospheres
                  - Dust
                  - Environment
                  - Glacial
                  - Ice
                  - Climate
                  - Ecosystems
                  - Water
                  - mongolia
                  -  United States
                  - Arapaho Glacier
                  -  Rocky Mountains
                  -  Ulaan Taiga Mountains
                  - Colorado

View All **
SV FUND, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. John D'ERRICO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0236

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### In the Matter of the Estates of Edward L. Osterndorf and another, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

October 31, 1973.

*Richard J. Osterndorf*for petitioner.

John D. Bennett, S.

This is a petition to authorize the administrator and direct the sale of real property under terms and conditions set forth in a contract of sale which is annexed to the papers submitted.

EPTL 11-1.1 gives administrators broad powers and accordingly proceedings under SCPA 1901 for the sale of real property or SCPA 2107 for advice and direction should be exercised only in extraordinary situations *(Matter of*Tannenbaum, 20 A D 2d 808, affd. 15 N Y 2d 829; *Matter of Ebbets,*139 Misc. 250).

The question here deals with one of business judgment and not law. Because of the litigation involving the infants in the within estate, the court can appreciate the administrator being cautious in selling the real property. However, since the statute provides the administrator with the authority to sell the real property, he should make the business judgment and utilize the powers afforded to him. In cases such as these, petitioning for said relief and being denied same on the grounds set forth herein may be enough of a protection of a fiduciary (see McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 58A, SCPA 1901, 1973-1974 Supp., p. 31, Supplementary Practice Commentary by Paul Powers, Jr.).

*731If courts encourage the use of proceedings under SOPA articles 19 and 21 concerning the sale of real property and said sections were used other than in extraordinary situations, this may have a tendency to unduly create in the minds of some a limitation of the powers afforded to fiduciaries under EPTL 11-1.1 and place unnecessary clouds on title.

Accordingly, the petition is denied.
Angela QUINTANAL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Angel QUINTANAL, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0214

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 161 (Thursday, August 20, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4370-N-01]


Fiscal Year 1999 Multifamily Housing Mortgage and Housing 
Assistance Restructuring Program Request for Qualifications

Correction

    In notice document 98-22029 beginning on page 44102 in the issue of 
Monday, August 17, 1998 make the following correction:
     On page 44105, third column, fifth line from the bottom, 
``September 27, 1998'' should read ``August 27, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Monetary Systems, Ltd.
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Danny W Weibling. Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Danny W
Weibling





Danny W
Weibling


Chief
Financial Officer





November
16, 2009
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ICEWEB, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, John R. Signorello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
     The Report complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




May 17,
2010




By:
              /s/ John R. SignorelloJohn
      R. Signorello,Chief
      Executive Officer, principal executive
officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,363
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,550,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           176
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,199,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,363
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (184,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.011)



</TABLE>
William D. STOGNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES DIVISION OF LICENSING, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40228]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------