alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 33447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20618]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 117/Thursday, June 18, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 33447]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Committee of Scientists Meetings

Correction

    In notice document 98-15427 beginning on page 31715 in the issue of 
Wednesday, June 10, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 31715, in the third column, in the SUMMARY, in the 20th 
line, ``commit'' should read ``comment''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Clinton Keith Dawson and Brandy Lake, 

Appellants

No. 06-13-00107-CV v.

Will Matthew Lowrey, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

1 of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CC1200401). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter participating. Dissenting Opinion by 

Justice Carter.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellants, Clinton Keith Dawson and Brandy Lake, pay all 

costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 29, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers certain 

medical records of veterans who receive health care from 

such providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5162 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vet Connect Act of 

3 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO DISCLOSE CERTAIN MEDICAL 

5 RECORDS OF VETERANS WHO RECEIVE NON6 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

7 HEALTH CARE. 

8 Section 7332(b)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(H) To a non-Department entity (including 

12 private entities and other departments or agencies of 

13 the Federal Government) that provides hospital care 

14 or medical treatment to veterans.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorwho receive health care from such providers. care providers certain medical records of veterans to non-Department of Veterans Affairs health ize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disclose
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Environmental Infrastructure Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Parrish,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  Michael D.
      Parrish.Michael
      D. ParrishChief
      Executive OfficerJanuary
      13, 2010
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Stable-isotope evidence for a magmatic component in fumarole condensates from Augustine Volcano, Cook Inlet, Alaska, U.S.A.      

      January 1, 1985    

D/H and  18O 16O ratios have been determined for fumarole condensates from Augustine Volcano, an active calc-alkaline stratovolcano in Lower Cook Inlet, Alaska. The isotopic data for the condensates form a linear ?? D-?? 18O array from low-temperature fluids (< 100??C) which are essentially local meteoric water (?? D {reversed tilde equals} -150???, ?? 18O {reversed tilde equals} -19???) to high-temperature (>450??C) fluids collected at the volcano summit which are enriched in both D and 18O (?? D {reversed tilde equals} -35???, ?? 18O {reversed tilde equals} +3.5???). Several lines of evidence suggest that the D-and 18O-rich condensates likely are "magmatic" fluids released into the hydrothermal system during and immediately after the 1976 eruption. Prior to 1976, the Augustine hydrothermal system was dominated completely by local meteoric waters. Between 1976 and 1982, fumarole condensates were observed to be variable mixtures of the "magmatic" fluid and meteoric water, with the proportion of the former systematically decreasing as the hydrothermal system cooled following the 1976 eruption. ?? 1985.

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10202]



      

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 3967]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[RP95-396-004]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Motion to Place Tariff 
Sheets Into Effect

Correction

    In notice document 96-936, beginning on page 1918, in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 24, 1996, the Docket Number should read as cited 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ANGELA MADRIGAL CHAVEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 24

- 1348

D.C. No.

4:22

- cr

- 06041

- MKD

- 3

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke

, District Judge , Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024 **

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Angela Madrigal Chavez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges her guilty

- plea co nviction and 120

- month sentence for conspiracy to

distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine

, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii) , and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 24

- 1348

738 (1967), Madrigal Chavez ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Madrigal Chavez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Madrigal Chavez waived her right to appeal her conviction and sentence.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5048 

AN ACT 

To require a study by the Comptroller General of the United 

States on Good Samaritan laws that pertain to treatment 

of opioid overdoses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5048 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Good Samaritan As3 sessment Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDING. 

5 The Congress finds that the executive branch, includ6 ing the Office of National Drug Control Policy, has a pol7 icy focus on preventing and addressing prescription drug 

8 misuse and heroin use, and has worked with States and 

9 municipalities to enact Good Samaritan laws that would 

10 protect caregivers, law enforcement personnel, and first 

11 responders who administer opioid overdose reversal drugs 

12 or devices. 

13 SEC. 3. GAO STUDY ON GOOD SAMARITAN LAWS PER14 TAINING TO TREATMENT OF OPIOID 

15 OVERDOSES. 

16 The Comptroller General of the United States shall 

17 submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House 

18 of Representatives, the Committee on Oversight and Gov19 ernment Reform of the House of Representatives, the 

20 Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, and the Com21 mittee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

22 of the Senate a report on— 

23 (1) the extent to which the Director of National 

24 Drug Control Policy has reviewed Good Samaritan 

25 laws, and any findings from such a review, including 
3 

•HR 5048 EH

1 findings related to the potential effects of such laws, 

2 if available; 

3 (2) efforts by the Director to encourage the en4 actment of Good Samaritan laws; and 

5 (3) a compilation of Good Samaritan laws in ef6 fect in the States, the territories, and the District of 

7 Columbia. 

8 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

9 In this Act— 

10 (1) the term ‘‘Good Samaritan law’’ means a 

11 law of a State or unit of local government that ex12 empts from criminal or civil liability any individual 

13 who administers an opioid overdose reversal drug or 

14 device, or who contacts emergency services providers 

15 in response to an overdose; and 

16 (2) the term ‘‘opioid’’ means any drug, includ17 ing heroin, having an addiction-forming or addiction18 sustaining liability similar to morphine or being ca19 pable of conversion into a drug having such addic20 tion-forming or addiction-sustaining liability. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 10, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5048 

AN ACT 

To require a study by the Comptroller General of 

other purposes. pertain to treatment of opioid overdoses, and for the United States on Good Samaritan laws that
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10116]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 11 / Friday, January 16, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 2723]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation


Title I, P.L. 480 Agreements With the Private Trade

Correction

    In notice document 97-31480 beginning on page 63694, in the issue 
of Tuesday, December 2, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 63694, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
second line, ``February 2, 1997'' should read ``February 2, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 219 (Friday, November 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11113]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants

CFR Correction

    In Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 1 to 199, 
revised as of Oct. 1, 1997, Sec. 17.44 is corrected by adding paragraph 
(v) as follows:


Sec. 17.44  Special rules--fishes.

 * * * * *
    (v) Gulf sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrhynchus desotoi). (1) No person 
shall take this species, except in accordance with applicable State 
fish and wildlife conservation laws and regulations for educational 
purposes, scientific purposes, the enhancement of propagation or 
survival of the species, zoological exhibition, or other conservation 
purposes consistent with the Act.
    (2) Any violation of applicable State fish and wildlife 
conservation laws or regulations with respect to taking of this species 
is also a violation of the Endangered Species Act.
    (3) No person shall possess, sell, deliver, carry, transport, ship, 
import, or export, by any means whatever, any of this species taken in 
violation of applicable State fish and wildlife conservation laws or 
regulations.
    (4) It is unlawful for any person to attempt to commit, solicit 
another to commit, or cause to be committed, any offense defined in 
paragraphs (v)(1) through (3) of this section.
    (5) Taking of this species for purposes other than those described 
in paragraph (v)(1) of this section, including taking incidental to 
otherwise lawful activities, is prohibited except when permitted under 
50 CFR 17.32.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1672

Lower Tribunal No. 2022-SC-043293-O

_____________________________

REVEREND LAWRENCE L. BLANKENSHIP,

Appellant, 

v.

XULON PRESS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the County Court for Orange County.

Andrew L. Cameron, Judge.

June 18, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Reverend Lawrence L. Blankenship, Pensacola, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources of Prince William Forest Park, Virginia      

      January 1, 1981    

View Plate

View Plate

Prince William Forest Park is in the southern part of Prince William County, Va. Its natural beauty and nearness to Washington, D.C. have made it one of the most popular recreation areas in northern Virginia. To help the National Park Service plan the development of new facilities and effectively manage its total resources, the U.S. Geological Survey made a hydrologic study of the park from October 1972 to November 1975. The overall objective of the Survey 's study was to evalute the quantity and quality of the park 's water resources. Available information was compiled and analyzed, and new data on streamflow, ground-water levels, and the chemical quality of water were collected. Test wells were drilled and aquifer tests made at the sites of wells to evaluate the occurrence and availability of ground water. (USGS)

## Citation Information
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 511 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands under 

the National Labor Relations Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2015 

Mr. ROKITA (for himself, Mr. KLINE, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. COLE, Mr. MULLIN, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

VALADAO, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, and Ms. JENKINS of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian 

lands under the National Labor Relations Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Labor Sov5 ereignty Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER. 

7 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 511 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or any en2 terprise or institution owned and operated by an In3 dian tribe and located on its Indian lands,’’ after 

4 ‘‘subdivision thereof’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(15) The term ‘Indian tribe’ means any Indian 

7 tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group 

8 or community which is recognized as eligible for the 

9 special programs and services provided by the 

10 United States to Indians because of their status as 

11 Indians. 

12 ‘‘(16) The term ‘Indian’ means any individual 

13 who is a member of an Indian tribe. 

14 ‘‘(17) The term ‘Indian lands’ means— 

15 ‘‘(A) all lands within the limits of any In16 dian reservation; 

17 ‘‘(B) any lands title to which is either held 

18 in trust by the United States for the benefit of 

19 any Indian tribe or individual or held by any 

20 Indian tribe or individual subject to restriction 

21 by the United States against alienation; and 

22 ‘‘(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma 

23 that are within the boundaries of a former resVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:42 Jan 29, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H511.IH H511

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 511 IH

1 ervation (as defined by the Secretary of the In2 terior) of a federally recognized Indian tribe.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Mile Peros, Plaintiff, *v.*Cia De Nav Mar Netumar et al., Defendants.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County,

November 16, 1973.

*Kenneth Heller*for plaintiff. *Cichanowicz <& Callan*for defendants.

Bubton S. Sheehan, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 5) claiming *res judicata*as the result of the dismissal of the identical action in the Federal court. It is by a longshoreman against a shipping company for personal injuries.

The dismissal in the Federal court, Southern District of New York was the result of the failure of the plaintiff to appear for an examination before trial pursuant to a direction by the court.. Judgment dismissing the complaint was also issued pursuant to court order. The order did not specify that the dismissal was without prejudice.

*914It is the general rule that the *res judicata*effect of a judgment is to be determined by the law of the State in which the judgment is rendered. *(Hinchey*v. *Sellers,*5 A D 2d 440 reversed on other grounds) N Y 2d 287; *Johnson*v. *Muelberger,*340 U. S. 581, 584; 8 N Y Jur., Conflicts of Law, § 37; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, § 450.) This also applies to the Federal jurisdiction *(Garvin*v. *Garvin,*302 N. Y. 96; *Oceanic Steam Nav. Co.*v. *Compania Transatlantic Espanola,*134 N. Y. 461.)

Subdivision (b) of rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (U. S. Code, tit. 28, Appendix, § 41, subd. [b]) states: “ Involuntary dismissal: effect thereof. For failure of the plaintiff '* * * to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action of any claim against him * * * Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this subdivision and any dismissal not provided for in this rule * * * operates as an adjudication upon the merits.”

This rule has been held to have the effect of *res judicata*in Federal courts. Thus where a case was originally dismissed for failure to answer written interrogatories, a new action in the Federal court based upon the same claim was dismissed as *res judicata. (Nasser*v. *Isthmian Lines,*331 F. 2d 124.)

While the court is aware of the fact that such a dismissal would not be considered on the merits in New York *(Clark*v. *Scovill,*198 N. Y. 279) it is bound to follow the New York conflicts of law rule.

The motion is granted and the complaint dismissed.
Case 19-14839-AJC Doc 43 Filed 05/21/19 Page 1 of 1
707 A.2d 1327

#### Glenn Vincent RHODES v. STATE of Maryland.

No. 115,

Sept. Term, 1997.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 7, 1998.

Sherrie B. Glasser, Assistant Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender), Baltimore, all on brief for petitioner.

Emmet Davitt, Assistant Attorney General (J. Joseph Cur-ran, Jr., Attorney General), Baltimore, all on brief for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER, WILNER and CATHELL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 7th day of April, 1998

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date: April 9, 2004                     By: /s/ Brajnandan B. Sahay
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Brajnandan B. Sahay
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer/
                                                  Principal Financial Officer


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medical Staffing
Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS REcEIvED 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

NOV 2 9 2012 

__________ HEARING DOCKET 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MAGORIEN HONING & HYDRAULICS 

FAA DOCKET NO. (not assigned) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0908 

FAA CASE NO. 2011WP910318 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

This is to give notice that the Respondent, Magorien Honing & Hydraulics, will be 

appearing in this matter through its counsel: 

Dated: November 21, 2012 

Doug Griffith, Esq. 

LAW OFFICE OF DOUG GRIFFITH 

633 W. 5th St., Ste. 2800 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Ph.: 213-223-2092 

Fax: 213-814-4530 

Email: doug@douggriffithlaw.com 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF DOUG GRIFFITH 

Doug Griffith, Esq. 

Counsel for Respondent 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date sent, by certified U.S. Mail, an original and 

one copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance addressed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

as well as one copy by certified U.S. Mail addressed to each of: 

Michael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dated: November 21, 2012 ~ ~~­ Wa I Wiff/1 

Doug Griffith, Esq.