alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

REGINALD EARL RICE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District 

Judge. (7:07-cr-01475-HMH-1) 

Submitted: April 8, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009 

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, 

Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, 

United States Attorney, E. Jean Howard, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Reginald Earl Rice appeals his conviction and life 

sentence for bank robbery by force or violence in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2006). Rice contends the district court 

erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a 

result of a constitutionally deficient search warrant. We 

affirm. 

 We review the district court’s factual findings 

underlying a motion to suppress for clear error, and the 

district court’s legal determinations de novo. United States v. 

Wilson, 484 F.3d 267, 280 (4th Cir. 2007) (citing Ornelas v. 

United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996)). When a suppression 

motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most 

favorable to the government. United States v. Uzenski, 434 F.3d 

690, 704 (4th Cir. 2006). 

 In reviewing the propriety of issuing a search 

warrant, the relevant inquiry is whether, under the totality of 

the circumstances, the issuing judge had a substantial basis for 

concluding that there was probable cause to issue the warrant. 

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983). Although the 

search warrant at issue failed to specify the exact address of 

the premises to be searched, under the totality of the 

circumstances we find there were sufficient corroborating facts 

2 
3 

establishing probable cause supporting the issuance and 

execution of the search warrant. See id. at 238. 

 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Science 
-  Science Explorer 

# Information Systems

The topical directory below provides an alternate way to browse USGS science programs and activities. Explore within each topic by data, news, images, video, social media, and much more.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4952 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4952

 To impose a deadline by which a person whose Federal firearms license 
has expired, or is surrendered, or revoked, must liquidate the firearms 
    inventory of any business subject to the license, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2016

 Mr. Russell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose a deadline by which a person whose Federal firearms license 
has expired, or is surrendered, or revoked, must liquidate the firearms 
    inventory of any business subject to the license, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Federal Firearms Licensing 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR LIQUIDATION OF FIREARMS BUSINESS INVENTORY AFTER 
              EXPIRATION, SURRENDER, OR REVOCATION OF FEDERAL FIREARMS 
              LICENSE.

    Section 923 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(m)(1)(A) A person whose license issued under this chapter has 
expired, or is surrendered or revoked, shall liquidate the firearms 
inventory of any business subject to the license, by the end of the 
period described in subparagraph (B). During that period, the license 
shall continue to be considered valid.
    ``(B) The period described in this subparagraph is the 60-day 
period beginning with the effective date of the expiration, surrender, 
or revocation, plus such additional period as the Attorney General may 
allow on a showing of reasonable cause.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a person if a 
United States district court for the judicial district in which the 
person resides or in which the principal place of business of the 
person subject to the license is located finds, by clear and convincing 
evidence, that the continued operation by the person of the business 
poses an immediate and grave threat to public safety.''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF WILLFULLY.

    Section 923(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(5) For purposes of this subsection, the term `willfully' means, 
with respect to conduct of a person, that the person knew of a legal 
duty, and engaged in the conduct knowingly and in intentional disregard 
of the duty. Repetition of a recordkeeping violation, regardless of 
frequency, shall not be considered evidence that the licensee committed 
the violation knowingly and in intentional disregard of a legal 
duty.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-653]



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2006 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 4968]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-838]


Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada

Correction

    In notice document E5-653 beginning on page 3458 in the issue of 
Monday, January 23, 2006, make the following correction:
    On page 3460, the table is corrected in part to read as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Original weighted- Amended  weighted-
         Producer/exporter            average margin    average  margin
                                       (percentage)       (percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              * * * * * * *
Buchanan (and its affiliates                     2.86               2.76
 Atikokan Forest Products Ltd.,
 Long Lake Forest Products Inc.,
 Nakina Forest Products
 Limited,\9\ Buchanan Distribution
 Inc., Buchanan Forest Products
 Ltd., Great West Timber Ltd.,
 Dubreuil Forest Products Ltd.,
 Northern Sawmills Inc., McKenzie
 Forest Products Inc., Buchanan
 Northern Hardwoods Inc., Northern
 Wood, and Solid Wood Products
 Inc.)............................
Canfor \10\ (and its affiliates                  1.36               1.35
 Canfor Wood Products Marketing
 Ltd., Canadian Forest Products,
 Ltd., Bois Daaquam Inc. / Daaquam
 Lumber Inc., Lakeland Mills Ltd.,
 The Pas Lumber Company Ltd. /
 Winton Sales, Howe Sound Pulp and
 Paper Limited Partnership, Winton
 Global Lumber Ltd., and Skeena
 Cellulose).......................
Tembec (and its affiliates Marks                 4.02              4.02
 Lumber Ltd., Excel Forest
 Products, Les Industries Davidson
 Inc., Produits Forestiers Temrex
 Limited Partnership, Tembec
 Industries Inc., Spruce Falls
 Inc.)............................
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[FR Doc. Z6-653 Filed 1-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
November 9, 2011

Mr. Benjamin Louis Magro Coastal Helicopters, Inc. 141 Peabody Road Appleton, ME 04862

Dear Mr. Magro:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your November 7, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Coastal Helicopters, Inc. into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-1246), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). Specifically, we require the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Jamarius Devonti GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Jyrki Salo, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of UPM-Kymmene Corporation;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over 
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
companys ability to record, process, 
summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over
financial reporting.  Date:  March 15, 2007   /s/ JYRKI SALOJyrki Salo
  Executive Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Alan Rush/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancin

Pritchard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Le

Nathaniel Jutras/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Patricia Grim/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/28/2011 12:52 PM

Subject: Re: OIRA has concluded review of EPA's NPRM CO NAAQS

Thank you very much Heidi. We appreciate all the work you have done on this proposed rule.
In  connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the
period  ended  December  31,  2005  as  filed  with  the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities  and  on  the  dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operation of the
Company.



               /s/  Jon  R.  Latorella
               Jon  R.  Latorella
               President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
               May  10,  2006



               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer
               May  10,  2006




<PAGE>
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment N° 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Veolia Environnement; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/ Antoine Frérot                     |   |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|            | Name: Antoine Frérot                   |
|            | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
II 

Calendar No. 643 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4742 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Reported by Mr. THUNE, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To authorize the National Science Foundation to support 

entrepreneurial programs for women. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Women in 

5 Entrepreneurship Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) women make up almost 50 percent of the 

9 workforce, but less than 25 percent of the workforce 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4742 RS

1 in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 

2 (STEM) professions; 

3 (2) women are less likely to focus on the STEM 

4 disciplines in undergraduate and graduate study; 

5 (3) only 26 percent of women who do attain de6 grees in STEM fields work in STEM jobs; 

7 (4) there is an increasing demand for individ8 uals with STEM degrees to extend their focus be9 yond the laboratory so they can be leaders in dis10 covery commercialization; 

11 (5) studies have shown that technology and 

12 commercialization ventures are successful when 

13 women are in top management positions; and 

14 (6) the National Science Foundation’s mission 

15 includes supporting women in STEM disciplines. 

16 SEC. 3. SUPPORTING WOMEN’S ENTREPRENEURIAL PRO17 GRAMS. 

18 Section 33 of the Science and Engineering Equal Op19 portunities Act (42 U.S.C. 1885a) is amended— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

21 (10); 

22 (2) by striking the period at the end of para23 graph (11) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

25 paragraph: 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4742 RS

1 ‘‘(12) encourage its entrepreneurial programs to 

2 recruit and support women to extend their focus be3 yond the laboratory and into the commercial 

4 world.’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 643 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4742 

AN ACT 

To authorize the National Science Foundation to 

support entrepreneurial programs for women. 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: Chapter 11 Cases 

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-13797-SMG 

LPT, LLC, Case No. 21-15537-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER MARYLAND, LLC, Case No. 21-15539-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER DISTRICT OF 

COLUMBIA, LLC, Case No. 21-15540-SMG 

Debtors. (Jointly administered 21-13797-SMG) 

__________________________________/ 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEBTORS’ EXPEDITED MOTION TO 

COMPEL COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY TO COMPLY WITH 

SALE ORDER [ECF NO. 385] AND FACILITATE TRANSFER OF DEBTORS’ 

LOW- INCOME CUSTOMER CONTRACTS TO BUYER

THIS CASE came before the Court on May 11, 2022 at 2:30 p.m. (the “Hearing”) upon 

the Debtors’ Expedited Motion to Compel Commonwealth Edison Company to Comply with Sale 

Order [ECF No. 385] And Facilitate Transfer of Debtors’ Low-Income Customer Contracts to 

Buyer [ECF No. 630] (the “Motion”). For the reasons stated on the record, it is 

ORDERED as follows: 

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 12, 2022.

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 661 Filed 05/13/22 Page 1 of 2
 2 

1. The Hearing on the Debtors’ Motion is continued to May 18, 2022 at 2:30 p.m. 

before the Honorable Scott M. Grossman at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 299 East Broward 

Blvd., Courtroom 308, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 

2. Although the Court will conduct the hearing in person, any interested party may 

choose to attend the hearing remotely using the services of Zoom Video Communications, Inc. 

(“Zoom”), which permits remote participation by video or by telephone, if the judge's procedures 

allow. To participate in the hearing remotely via Zoom (whether by video or by telephone), you 

must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. 

To register, click on or manually enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsceqsqzMtG7hezfpqRtlAFR1SzvHObJU

3. All participants (whether attending in person or remotely) must observe the 

formalities of the courtroom, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner 

consistent with the dignity of the Court. This includes appropriate courtroom attire for those 

participants appearing in person or by video. 

# # # 

Submitted by:

Paul J. Battista, Esq. 

Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 

Counsel to Debtors-in-Possession 

100 SE 2nd Street, 44th Floor 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: 305-349-2300 

pbattista@gjb-law.com

Copy to: Paul J. Battista, Esq. 

(Attorney Battista is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all parties in interest) 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 661 Filed 05/13/22 Page 2 of 2
Jairus COLLINS v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01002-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 3, 2018 Closed: August 2, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Glenda Faye LAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 29, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           The U.S. Geological Survey, branch of Astrogeology - a chronology of activities from conception through the end of Project Apollo (1960-1973)              

      January 1, 2005    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Case 19-27130-EPK Doc 15 Filed 01/24/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-27130-EPK Doc 15 Filed 01/24/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-27130-EPK Doc 15 Filed 01/24/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                             THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                                     OF 2002

           In connection with the Annual Report of Healthcare Network Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sharon Allred, Chief Executive Officer and Principle Accounting
and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      result of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/Sharon Allred

                                      Sharon Allred
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
September 30, 2002
E.F., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. S.C., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5026

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Rodgerick Angelo SHOULDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 29, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.