alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-51029

JOE EPPERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-97-CV-533

- - - - - - - - - - February 19, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Joe Epperson, Texas prisoner # 588235, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) for an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application as barred by limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). COA will be granted only if Epperson makes a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the underlying issue is not of constitutional dimension, as in this COA application, the prisoner must first make a credible showing that the district court erred before this court will consider whetherNo. 97-51029 - 2 - he has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Murphy v. Johnson , 110 F.3d 10, 11 (5th Cir. 1997). A one-year period of limitation applies to applications for a writ of habeas corpus by persons in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). A habeas applicant whose claims otherwise would be time-barred because the limitations period would have expired before the effective date of the AEDPA had until April 24, 1997, to file his habeas application. Flanagan v. Johnson , 154 F.3d 196, 200-02 (5th Cir. 1998). Because Epperson’s conviction became final prior to the effective date of the AEDPA, without tolling, Epperson had until April 24, 1997, to file his § 2254 application. Epperson’s habeas application was filed after that date. Under § 2244(d)(2), the period during which an application for state habeas corpus relief regarding the same conviction and sentence is pending is not counted towards the one-year statutory limitations period in § 2244(d)(1). See Fields v. Johnson , 159 F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir. 1998). Because Epperson’s state postconviction proceeding was pending for 98 days during the year following April 24, 1996, Epperson had 98 days past April 24, 1997, within which to file his habeas application in the district court. His June 16, 1997, habeas application was filed within that time. COA is GRANTED as to this issue only. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of Epperson’s unaddressed underlying habeas corpus claims. See Whitehead v. Johnson , 157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1998).No. 97-51029 - 3 - Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-76930,333-76392, 333-114989, 333-114990, 333-114991, 333-114992, 333-114993, and 333-114997) on Form S-8and the registration statement (No. 333-123038) on Form S-3 of Southern Community FinancialCorporation of our report dated March 9, 2006, except as to the restatement discussed in note 1 tothe consolidated financial statements which is as of August 9, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Southern Community Financial Corporation and Subsidiary, andour report dated March 9, 2006, except as to the matter described in the third paragraph ofManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, which is as of August 9, 2006,with respect to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report onForm 10-K/A of Southern Community Financial Corporation.**/s/*****Dixon Hughes PLLC***Raleigh, North CarolinaAugust 9, 2006
Page 115
E.W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2478

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

Case No.: 21-14282-SMG

Chapter 13

Efrain Navarrete

 

 Debtor(s) /

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION 

TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the 

priority status of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection 

carefully to identify which claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is 

recommended. Upon the filing of this objection an expedited hearing on this objection 

will be scheduled on the date already scheduled for the confirmation hearing in 

accordance with Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the 

[trustee][debtor] objects to the following claim filed in this case:

Claim Amount of

No. Name of Claimant Claim 

3-1 Nubia Del Rocio Lopez Navarrete $16,874.68

Basis for Objection and Recommended Disposition

On or about May 24, 2021, Creditor filed a priority unsecured proof of claim for a total 

amount of $16,874.68 for past-due alimony in the amount of $14,875.00 and past-due child 

support in the amount of $2,449.60. 

Debtor has completed his own sworn statement that is attached to this objection as Exhibit 

“A” detailing that the regular support required to be paid of $499.29 from the effective pay 

date of November 15, 2019, as stated in the Support Order, to the Date of filing of April 

30, 2021. This amount does not include the $900 arrearage since it is included in the first 

amended plan filed. 

The alimony obligation from that time period is $15,750.00, minus the amount of 

$3,625.00 that Debtor has previously paid leaves his past-due alimony at $12,125.00. 

The child support obligation from that time period is $8,998.56, minus the amount of 

$13,396.56 that he has previously paid leaves his past-due child support at ($4,398.00). 

Case 21-14282-SMG Doc 20 Filed 07/15/21 Page 1 of 2
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

Since the Debtor is paid ahead in child support by $4,398.00, the alimony arrears should 

be reduced by said amount. Thus, the total of these two amounts is $7,727.00. 

Thus, the Debtor seeks an Order from the Court reducing the total claim and priority claim 

amount as stated above to $7,727.00 plus the $900.00 of prior arrears for a total of 

$8,627.00. 

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this 

objection will be served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the 

confirmation hearing date and that a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-

1(F) must be filed with the court when the objection and notice of hearing are served.

DATED: July 15, 2021 Respectfully Submitted: 

Robert Sanchez, P.A.

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Fl. Bar No. 0442161

Telephone: (305) 687-8008

E-Mail: court@bankruptcyclinic.com

Case 21-14282-SMG Doc 20 Filed 07/15/21 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4789 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4789

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2016

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish a structure for 
visitor services on the Arlington Ridge tract, in the area of the U.S. 
           Marine Corps War Memorial, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``Arlington Ridge tract'' means the parcel of 
Federal land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as the Nevius 
Tract and transferred to the Department of the Interior in 1953, that 
is bounded generally by--
            (1) Arlington Boulevard (United States Route 50) to the 
        north;
            (2) Jefferson Davis Highway (Virginia Route 110) to the 
        east;
            (3) Marshall Drive to the south; and
            (4) North Meade Street to the west.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF A VISITOR SERVICES FACILITY ON THE ARLINGTON 
              RIDGE TRACT.

    Notwithstanding section 2863(g) of Public Law 107-107, the 
Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct a structure for 
visitor services to include a public restroom facility on the Arlington 
Ridge tract in the area of the U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
FLORIDA EDUCATION PROPERTIES ROLLING OAKS, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. GRAY CONSTRUCTION & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismiss.
Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 41 Filed 08/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 41 Filed 08/19/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Trends and effects of organochlorine residues on Oregon and Nevada wading birds, 1979-83      

      January 1, 1985    

The incidence of DDT (parent compound) declined significantly in the eggs of Black-crowned Night-Herons (Nycticorax nycticorax), White-faced Ibis (Plegadis chihi), and Black-necked Stilts (Himantopus mexicanus), and showed a downward trend in Snowy Egrets (Egretta thula).  Mean  DDE residues (breakdown product of DDT) in eggs declined significantly in Black-crowned Night-Herons and showed a downward trend in Black-necked Stilts and Snowy Egrets; however, no trend was apparent for White-faced Ibis. Some night-herons, egrets, and ibis laid thin-shelled eggs  that cracked; eggshell thickness was negatively correlated with DDE residues in the egg contents. Ibis were the most sensitive species to DDE- induced shell thinning. Generally, reduced reproductive success for ibis started at lower DDE egg residues (3 ppm) than for either Snowy Egrets (5  ppm) or night-herons (8 ppm). Egg residue profiles, band recoveries, biotelemetry studies, and residues in fish and other prey items implicate the  southwestern United States (a wintering area) as an important source of DDT-DDE that caused the most serious reproductive problem encountered  during the study (in night-herons nesting at Ruby Lake, Nevada). Available evidence indicates that the three other species, together with night- herons from Oregon and Idaho, winter in Latin America.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Oregon

View All **
James L. HARPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 3 (iii).
               Certificate of Amendment to Articles of
               Incorporation filed on November 5, 2002.

    Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
               For Nevada Profit Corporations
   (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of
                           Stock)
                   - Remit in Duplicate -

1. Name of corporation: Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc.

2.  The  articles  have  been amended  as  follows  (provide
article numbers, if available):

FOURTH  Article of the Articles of Incorporation: The  total
number  of  shares  authorized that may  be  issued  by  the
Corporation Is FIFTY MILLION (50,000,000) with a  par  value
of $0.001.

3.  The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the
corporation entitling them to exercise at least  a  majority
of  the  voting  power, or such greater  proportion  of  the
voting  power as may be required In the case of  a  vote  by
classes  or  series, or as may be required by the provisions
of  the articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the
amendment is: 95%.*

4. Officer Signature (Required):

/s/ Kelly Jones, President     /s/   Nicole  Jones, Secretary-Treasurer
--------------------------     ----------------------------------------
Kelly Jones                    Nicole Jones.

*If  any  proposed  amendment  would  alter  or  change  any
preference or any relative or other right given to any class
or  series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be
approved  by the vote.  In addition to the affirmative  vote
otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing  a
majority  of  the  voting  power of  each  class  or  series
affected  by  the  amendment regardless  of  limitations  or
restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT:  Failure to include any of the above  information
and  remit  the  proper fees may cause  this  filing  to  be
rejected.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND HUME,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL , Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 35912

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 01766

- SB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 26, 2019 **

Before: FARRIS, TROTT, and SILVERMAN , Circuit Judges.

Raymond Hume appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner

of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 28 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35912

(Act). We have jur isdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We

review de novo, Attmore v. Colvin , 827 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2016), and we

reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The ALJ provided a specific and legitimate reason for assigning little weight

to treating psychologist Dr. Born’s opinion as to the degree of limitation caused by

Hume’s mental health impairments. See Tommasetti v. Astrue , 533 F.3d 1035,

1041 (9th Cir. 2008) (citation and in ternal quotation marks omitted). Substantial

evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Dr. Born’s opinion was inconsistent with

the normal mental status findings reported by other doctors . Because the ALJ

provided a specific and legitimate reason for assign ing little weight to Dr. Born’s

opinion, any error in the ALJ’s additional reasoning was harmless. See Molina v.

Astrue , 674 F.3d 1104, 1115 (9th Cir. 2012).

Substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s step

- four finding that Hume

is capable of perform ing his past work as a surveillance system monitor as actually

performed. See Pinto v. Massanari , 249 F.3d 840, 84 4 (9th Cir. 2001) ( “Although

the burden of proof lies with the claimant at step four, the ALJ still has a duty to

make the requisite factual findings to support his conclusion.”). Hume’s testimony

indicates that his past work as actually performed includes functional demands that

exceed the limitations in his RFC to “simple tasks, routine and repetitive tasks”

and “only occasional interaction with coworkers and the public.” Because the ALJ3 17

- 35912

did not discount this testimony or make any findings as to how Hume’s past work

was act ually performed, substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s step

- four

finding. See id. at 847 (by failing to make specific findings as to the actual

demands of past work, the ALJ provided no basis on which to review the agency

decision). We remand for the ALJ to reconsider the step

- four conclusion and, if

necessary, proceed to step five.

REVERSED and REMANDED

.
Timothy Fawn CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10618]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
* * * * *
FEDERAL REGISTER NUMBER: 15702.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE & TIME: Thursday, June 18, 1998, 10:00 a.m., 
Meeting open to the public.
    This meeting has been cancelled.
* * * * *
DATE & TIME: Tuesday, June 23, 1998 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *
DATE & TIME: Thursday, June 25, 1998 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Audit: 1996 Democratic National Convention Committee, Inc.
    Audit: Chicago's Committee for `96.
    Soft Money: Revised Draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR. Doc. 98-16334 Filed 6-16-98; 10:49 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Corey GOINES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1473

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 
| Dated March 19, 2014 |                                                      |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                      |
|                      | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                                         |
|                      | Erin M. Rohde                                             |
|                      | Assistant Treasurer of                                    |
|                      | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,                            |
|                      | as Servicer of Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner Trust A |

 

----
### NUMBER 13

- 2 1

- 00 008

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF A.T.M., G.B., AND P.F.L., CHILDREN

On appeal from the 377th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas

.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. Appellants’ briefs were

filed on March 15 and 16, 2021. The brief of a ppellee, the Texas Department of Family

and Protective Services, was due on April 6 , 2021. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b). Appellee

has filed a motion for extension of time seeking fifteen additional days to file the brief.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals, but include additional expedited

deadlines and procedures. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4; T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2(a). The2 intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that

appeals in such cases are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the

notice of appeal is filed. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2(a). Accordingly

, it is the policy of this

Court to limit e xtensions of time in such cases

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

W e GRANT appell ee’s motion for extension of time and ORDER appell ee’ s brief

to be filed on or before 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday

, April 2 1 , 202 1 . No further extensions of

time will be granted absent truly extraordinary circumstances

.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed on the

7th day of April

, 20 2 1.