alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re: Case No.: 20-19836-AJCChapter 13

Marco T & Maria Barrios

 Debtor(s) /

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF SPECIALIZED LOAN 

SERVICING/SLS

THIS MATTER having come to be heard without objection on March 23, 2021 at 9:00 AM 

upon Debtor’s Objection to Claim of Specialized Loan Servicing/SLS (ECF#69; claim #12-1) and 

based on the record, IT IS; 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The objection to the proof of claim of Specialized Loan Servicing/SLS is SUSTAINED.

2. The claim is allowed as filed except for allowing the direct and regular maintenance 

payments of the first three months post-petition, which totals $5,602.65, to be discounted from the 

direct and regular maintenance payment amount where said payments were paid directly to the 

Creditor. 

3. Thus, said payments are considered as if they were paid in the plan. 

# # #

The Law Office of Robert Sanchez, P.A., is hereby directed to mail a conformed copy of this order to all affected parties 

and file a certificate of service.

Respectfully Submitted: 

Robert Sanchez, P.A.

Robert Sanchez, Esq.; Fl. Bar No. 0442161

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Telephone: (305) 687-8008

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 16, 2021.

Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 88 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 1
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5074 

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to any State or local educational 

agency that denies or prevents participation in constitutional prayer 

in schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2016 

Mrs. ELLMERS of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to any State 

or local educational agency that denies or prevents participation in constitutional prayer in schools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING CONTINGENT ON RESPECT FOR CON4 STITUTIONAL SCHOOL PRAYER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, no funds made available through the Depart7 ment of Education shall be provided to any State or local 

8 educational agency that has a policy of denying, or that 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5074 IH

1 effectively prevents participation in, constitutional prayer 

2 in public schools by individuals on a voluntary basis. 

3 (b) LIMITATION.—No person shall be required to par4 ticipate in prayer, or shall influence the form or content 

5 of any constitutional prayer, in public schools. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Juan MARTINEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2524

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Teton Dam flood of June 1976, Moody quadrangle, Idaho      

      January 1, 1976    

View Plate

The failure of the Teton Dam caused extreme flooding along the Teton River, Henrys Fork, and Snake River in southeastern Idaho on June 5-8, 1976. No flooding occurred downstream from American Falls Reservoir. The inundated areas and maximum water-surface elevations are shown in a series of 17 hydrologic atlases. The area covered by the atlases extends from Teton Dam downstream to American Falls Reservoir, a distance of 100 miles. The extent of flooding shown on the maps was obtained by field inspections and aerial photographs made during and immediately after the flood. There may be small isolated areas within the boundaries shown that were not flooded, but the identification of these sites was beyond the scope of the study. The elevation data shown are mean-sea-level elevations of high-water marks identified in the field. This particular map (in the 17-map series) shows conditions in the Moody quadrangle. (Woodard-USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Idaho Water Science Center

230 Collins Rd.Boise, ID83702-4520United States

Phone: (208) 387-1300

(208) 387-1372

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Moody Quadrangle
                  - Idaho

View All **
Corey THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
10609578-1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

 

AMERICAN PURCHASING SERVICES, Case No. 20-23495-SMG 

LLC d/b/a American Medical Depot, 

DVSS ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, Case No. 20-23501-SMG 

AMD PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, and Case No. 20-23503-SMG 

AMERICAN MEDICAL DEPOT HOLDINGS, Case No. 20-23504-SMG 

LLC,1 

 Debtors. Chapter 7 Cases 

 (Jointly Administered) 

 / 

NOTICE OF CONTINUED SECTION 341 MEETING OF CREDITORS 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Section 341 Meeting of Creditors has been 

continued in the above matter to July 9, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. EDT in the United States Bankruptcy 

Court, Federal Building, 299 E. Broward Boulevard, Room 112, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 

*** MEETING WILL BE HELD BY TELEPHONE*** 

Trustee: Marc P. Barmat 

Call in number: 866-744-0092 

Passcode: 2402907 

Dated: June 3, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 BERGER SINGERMAN LLP 

 Counsel for the Debtors 

1450 Brickell Avenue, Ste. 1900 

 Miami, FL 33131 

 Telephone: (305) 714-4385 

 Facsimile: (305) 714-4340 

 By: /s/ Robin J. Rubens 

 Robin J. Rubens 

 Florida Bar No. 959413 

 rrubens@bergersingerman.com 

1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the addresses and last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification 

number are American Purchasing Services, LLC (7158), DVSS Acquisition Company, LLC (4147), AMD Pennsylvania, 

LLC (1107) and American Medical Depot Holdings, LLC (4183). The address of the Debtors is 10315 USA Today 

Way, Miramar, FL 33025. 

Case 20-23495-SMG Doc 383 Filed 06/03/21 Page 1 of 1
Ricardo DOMINGUEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF LICENSING, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-123513, No. 333-134045 and No. 333-165495 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 28, 2013, relating to the financial statements of AIXTRON SE  and the effectiveness of AIXTRON SEs internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of AIXTRON SE for the year ended December 31, 2012.  /s/ Deloitte &   Touche GmbH WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftDeloitte &   ToucheGmbHWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftDuesseldorf, Germany, February 28, 2013
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Spatial sampling bias and model complexity in stream-based species distribution models: A case study of Paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) in the Arkansas River basin, USA      

      December 25, 2019    

Leveraging existing presence records and geospatial datasets, species distribution modeling has been widely applied to informing species conservation and restoration efforts. Maxent is one of the most popular modeling algorithms, yet recent research has demonstrated Maxent models are vulnerable to prediction errors related to spatial sampling bias and model complexity. Despite elevated rates of biodiversity imperilment in stream ecosystems, the application of Maxent models to stream networks has lagged, as has the availability of tools to address potential sources of error and calculate model evaluation metrics when modeling in nonraster environments (such as stream networks). Herein, we use Maxent and customized R code to estimate the potential distribution of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) at a stream-segment level within the Arkansas River basin, USA, while accounting for potential spatial sampling bias and model complexity. Filtering the presence data appeared to adequately remove an eastward, large-river sampling bias that was evident within the unfiltered presence dataset. In particular, our novel riverscape filter provided a repeatable means of obtaining a relatively even coverage of presence data among watersheds and streams of varying sizes. The greatest differences in estimated distributions were observed among models constructed with default versus AICC-selected parameterization. Although all models had similarly high performance and evaluation metrics, the AICC-selected models were more inclusive of westward-situated and smaller, headwater streams. Overall, our results solidified the importance of accounting for model complexity and spatial sampling bias in SDMs constructed within stream networks and provided a roadmap for future paddlefish restoration efforts in the study area.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Colt Holley (Former Employee)          

##### Fish Biologist

Columbia Environmental Research Center

#### James M. Long, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

jmlong@usgs.gov

## Related Content

####             Colt Holley (Former Employee)          

##### Fish Biologist

Columbia Environmental Research Center

#### James M. Long, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

jmlong@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arkansas River Basin
                  - Arkansas
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Kansas
                  -  Missouri
                  -  Nebraska
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Texas

View All **
Mario Perez DE CORCHO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM and Brenda Espinoza, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

      ( print page 62351)    

### Correction

In notice document E6-17508 beginning on page 61731 in the issue of Thursday, October 19, 2006, make the following correction:

                On page 61731, in the second column, under the heading “                **DATES**                ”, in the sixth line, “January 17, 2006” should read “January 17, 2007”.            

[FR Doc. Z6-17508 Filed 10-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

68342

Vol. 63, No. 237

Thursday, December 10, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP99–80–000]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of

America; Notice of Application

Correction

In notice document 98–32162,

appearing on page 66792, in the issue of

Thursday, December 3, 1998, the docket

number is corrected to read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 332–399]

General Agreement on Trade in

Services: Examination of the

Schedules of Commitments Submitted

by African Trading Partners

Correction

In notice document 98–30886,

beginning on page 64274, in the issue of

Thursday, November 19, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 64275, in the second column,

in the eighth line from the bottom, after

‘‘business on’’, remove ‘‘4’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Tertiary landslides, northwestern South Dakota and Southeastern Montana      

      December 31, 1962    

Landslide blocks of latest Oligocene or earliest Miocene age are preserved at several localities in northwestern South Dakota and southeastern Montana. These tilted blocks contain Late Cretaceous to late Oligocene rocks and are unconformably overlain by nearly horizontal strata of the Arikaree Formation of Miocene age. Undisturbed rocks of late Oligocene age were completely stripped from the area by pre-Arikaree erosion.

More than 100 landslide blocks are preserved in the Slim Buttes, Harding County, South Dakota. Some of the blocks are several miles long, 600 feet wide, and contain a thickness of 300 feet or more of relatively unbroken or unjumbled strata which have been displaced downward as much as 250 feet. The strike of the tilted blocks is about N. 60° W., and the dip of the bedding in the blocks at most places is to the southwest and ranges from a few to more than 60°. Most of the rock in the blocks consists of coarse arkosic sandstone, tuffaceous siltstone, claystone, and thick beds of bentonite of the Chadron and Brule formations of Oligocene age. In a few places, small sections of the underlying Paleocene strata are tilted. The blocks formed along northwest-trendingpre-Arikaree valley walls and escarpments. The major joint system of underlying rocks apparently controlled the orientation of the slides, and the dip of these older rocks facilitated the downward and outward movement of the landslide blocks.

The Short Pine Hills, Harding County, South Dakota, and the Long Pine Hills, Carter County, Montana, contain numerous landslide blocks that are similar in orientation and geologic setting to those of the Slim Buttes. In contrast, the Finger Buttes of Carter County, Montana, contain landslide blocks that strike about N. 70° E. and dip to the southeast. This lack of parallelism with blocks of nearby areas is apparently due to the lack of a well-developed joint system in underlying rocks of this area.

The presence of the complete sequence of Oligocene rocks in the downdropped blocks indicates that before pre-Arikaree erosion the area was covered by 500 feet or more of beds of the Chadron and Brule formations. These landslide blocks show that the time interval represented by the unconformity at the base of the Arikaree Formation was of relatively short duration.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Montana
                  -  South Dakota

View All **
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
      undersigned, Issachar Gerlitz, Chief Executive Officer of Ness Technologies,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his
      knowledge, that:





The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of the
      Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                March 17, 2008
            /s/Issachar
                GerlitzIssachar
                GerlitzChief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certitfication pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of PARK HILL  CAPITAL  I  CORP.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Francis Mailhot, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 19, 2005                      /s/ Francis Mailhot
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Francis Mailhot
                                                Chief Accounting Officer
Michelle THOMAS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marcus Thomas, Appellant, v. BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY, INC., Lamar D. Bryant and Marcus Allen and Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia Fraternity of America, Inc., Appellees.

Case Nos. 5D16-3842 5D17-683

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 12.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, R.S.P. Sinha, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone
     Nigam Limited;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  [Reserved]

     (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:     September 29, 2004

          /s/ R.S.P. Sinha
Name:     R.S.P. Sinha
Title:    Chairman-cum-Managing Director
Alexandra A. CANCEL, Petitioner, v. Roberto MONTANEZ, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 1, 2018

Richard L. Wilson, Orlando, for Petitioner.

H. Kyle Fletcher, of Fletcher Law Firm, Oviedo, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Alexandra A. Cancel petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition to review the denial of her motion to disqualify the Honorable Luis F. Calderon from presiding over her child relocation case against Roberto Montanez. We grant the petition.

We review trial court orders denying motions to disqualify trial judges by prohibition. *Isan v. Isan*, 209 So.3d 40, 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). Motions to disqualify are governed procedurally by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330. *See**Wall v. State*, 238 So.3d 127, 142 (Fla. 2018) ; *Krawczuk v. State*, 92 So.3d 195, 200 (Fla. 2012). Specifically, the motion to disqualify "shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion and shall be promptly presented to the court for an immediate ruling." Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e). Upon receiving the motion, the judge shall determine only the legal sufficiency of the motion without passing on the truth of the facts alleged. Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(f). The test for determining the legal sufficiency of a motion for disqualification is whether "the facts alleged (which must be taken as true) would prompt a reasonably prudent person to fear that he could not get a fair and impartial trial." *Hayslip v. Douglas*, 400 So.2d 553, 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Here, the facts presented in the affidavit, which we must presume to be true, are sufficient to prompt Cancel to fear that she cannot get a fair hearing.

Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition, quash the order denying the motion for recusal, and remand this case for assignment to a different trial judge.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Bernadette G. WOLFF, Petitioner, v. Charles L. WOLFF, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 31, 2018

Crystal C. Spencer, Spencer Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.