alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Lewis M. Blanton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3215

___________ Jennie D. Rhodes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 6, 2010 Filed: May 12, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jennie Rhodes appeals from the order of the District Court 1 affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision—issued af ter a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) and consis tent with the ALJ’s decision—denying Rhodes’s May 2005 application for supplemental security income. Following careful de novo-2- review, see Halpin v. Shalala , 999 F.2d 342, 345–46 (8th Cir. 1993) (explaining that court of appeals reviews mixed questions of law and fact de novo, even where claimant failed to object to the magistrate judge's factual findings), we conclude that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by s ubstantial evidence on the record as a whole, seeTilley v. Astrue , 580 F.3d 675, 679 (8th Cir. 2009) (noting that affirmance is warranted where the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, United States District Judge for ***

the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDDIE LOUIS BENNETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

B. CURRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-16690

D.C. No. 3:07-CV-02261-SI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: RYMER and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and PALLMEYER, District

Judge.*** 

FILED

JUL 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Freddie Louis Bennett, appearing pro se, appeals the dismissal of his habeas

petition for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and we affirm.

Bennett contends that he had a liberty interest protected by the 

Due Process Clause in certain prison disciplinary proceedings he says were unfair. 

In particular, he argues that the disciplinary proceedings and associated penalties

triggered a liberty interest because they “will inevitably affect the duration of his

sentence.” Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 487 (1995). His allegations do not

support that claim. Even assuming disciplinary proceedings might inevitably

affect the duration of confinement for a California indeterminate prisoner in some

circumstances, Bennett’s petition and documents crucial to it that he submitted to

the district court demonstrate that the Board of Parole Hearings has deemed

Bennett unsuitable for parole for several independently adequate reasons and not

only because of the disciplinary record he seeks to challenge. Because his

disciplinary record did not “alter the balance” in his parole suitability

determination, its effect if any on the duration of his sentence “is simply too

attenuated to invoke the procedural guarantees of the Due Process Clause.” 

Sandin, 515 U.S. at 487.
3

Bennett also contends that he had a liberty interest in the disciplinary

proceedings because they resulted in good time and postconviction credit penalties

that he says will affect the duration of his sentence. His allegations do not support

this claim because he is an indeterminate-term prisoner who has exceeded his

minimum sentence and served over 30 years, and it is therefore unlikely – and

certainly not inevitable – that any actual release date would be affected by these

penalties if he is ever deemed suitable for parole.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First
Transaction Management, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2008, I,
Susan Schreter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of First
Transaction Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | such Quarterly Report on
  Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the
  requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                      
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | the information contained
  in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
  2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.

| |                                               | 
| | --------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Susan Schreter                            | 
| |                                               | 
| | Susan Schreter                                | 
| | Chief Executive and Chief
  Financial Officer | 

April 28, 2008

---
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  Dennis                M. O’Connor                                               |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                      |   |   |        |
| Dennis                M. O’ConnorChief Financial OfficerSeptember 21,                2005 |   |   |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7424

BRUCE ALFONSO HATCHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRINCE WILLIAM-MANASSAS DETENTION CENTER'S

MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; DOCTOR ADAMS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-96-1029)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.

Bruce Alfonso Hatcher, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Hatcher v. Prince William-Manassas Detention Ctr., No. CA-96-1029

(E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seafloor observations eliminate a landslide as the source of the 1918 Puerto Rico Tsunami      

      February 3, 2023    

The 11 October 1918 devastating tsunami in northwest Puerto Rico had been used as an example for earthquake‐induced landslide tsunami hazard. Three pieces of evidence pointed to a landslide as the origin of the tsunami: the discovery of a large submarine landslide scar from bathymetry data collected by shipboard high‐resolution multibeam sonar, reported breaks of submarine cable within the scar, and the fit of tsunami models to flooding observations. Newly processed seafloor imagery collected by remotely operated vehicle (ROV) show, however, pervasive Fe–Mn crust (patina) on the landslide walls and floor, indicating that the landslide scar is at least several hundred years old. C14">14C dates of sediment covering the landslide floor verify this interpretation. Although we have not searched the region systematically for an alternative tsunami source, we propose a possible source—a two‐segment normal‐fault rupture along the eastern wall of Mona rift. The proposed fault location matches the published normal faults with steep bathymetry and is close to the International Seismological Center–Global Earthquake Model catalog locations of the 1918 mainshock and aftershocks. The ROV observations further show fresh vertical slickensides and rock exposure along the proposed fault trace. Hydrodynamic models from an Mw">Mw 7.2 earthquake rupture along the eastern wall of the rift faithfully reproduce the reported tsunami amplitudes, polarities, and arrival times. Our analysis emphasizes the value of close‐up observations and physical samples to augment remote sensing data in natural hazard studies.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Uri ten Brink, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

utenbrink@usgs.gov

508-457-2396

#### Jason Chaytor, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

jchaytor@usgs.gov

508-457-2351

#### Claudia Flores

##### Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

cflores@usgs.gov

508-457-2391

#### Brian Andrews

##### Geographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

bandrews@usgs.gov

508-457-2348

## Related Content

#### Uri ten Brink, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

utenbrink@usgs.gov

508-457-2396

#### Jason Chaytor, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

jchaytor@usgs.gov

508-457-2351

#### Claudia Flores

##### Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

cflores@usgs.gov

508-457-2391

#### Brian Andrews

##### Geographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

bandrews@usgs.gov

508-457-2348

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Puerto Rico

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 223 (Thursday, November 19, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-41119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-40557; File No. SR-Phix-97-55]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change and Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 to Proposed 
Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Establishing an 
Enhanced Parity Split Pilot Program for Specialists in Foreign Currency 
Options Effective Until October 1, 1999

Correction

    In notice document 98-28193, beginning on page 56284, in the issue 
of Wednesday, October 21, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 56286, in the third column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as follows:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-50221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AGL-15]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Toledo, OH

Correction

    In rule document 97-1925, beginning on page 3787, in the issue of 
Monday, January 27, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

     On Page 3788, in the second column, in Sec. 71.1, under AGL OH E5 
Toledo, OH [Revised], in the first full paragraph, the sixth line 
should read, ``41 deg.34'00''N., long. 83 deg.19'00''W.; to lat.''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE EX REL. Kevin ROMERO v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0001

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Romero v. State, 17-0674 (La.), ---So.3d ----.
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"&' ()%(%* +

,	-		,	 $	
'


./012345612738

9:;<:;6612738

.=539>?3@

:AA305>B3.=53

C5=53

1D

E=D5:B345

:B345.=539>?3@

:B345:AA305>B3.=53

.35=>?7F:45>5F6=23 G
	$)		$)		
	



&' ()%(%H&)I+JKL))

9>?>4M;4A/82=5>/4

)+KNON

PQOKOPNJ

+K

O+K

G)

(%R

(S&)T%&G& (T() U& %

NV+V

&

W8>40>X=?Y@@83DD

KJOI&)G R

Z[G& LU(+ON

$\++P+

]=>?>4MY@@83DD

KJOI&)G R

Z[G& LU(+ON

$\++P+

^3M>D5383@YM3456=23_Y@@83DD

`LaGG bS

OOG)(I)  %O

Z%U()S'(HLG)KKP+

$\++P+

($$$\K+J+P

Y15c/8>d3@W38D/4eDf.35=>?

6=23_Y@@83DD

%	
SI 

g&`(%LG (`

G
	$, R&&G& U& (%& Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-8 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
 	

	


		
	 
	
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"&' ()%(%* 

+,-.&)/ 0

12/& 34(5-6

7889:;<=>?@AB

<=>?@AC=:@ DE;=FG:A=

5- 5-5-

5 -55

5, 555,

G?H9I=8AJI:K=B

555,LL(M() 4& % 0	N		4/O

55P5LL)($ 0	N		4/O

-55LL(M() 4& % 0	N		4/O

5-5-LL %(%Q% 0	N		4/O

P+5PLL(M() 4& % 0	N		4/O

+5,5PLL)($ 0	N		4/O

5+LL/
	$)		$)		
	
 0	N		4/O

RSTUVWXYZ[XU\]Z^\T_`\X\ZaYVbVcVT^T_dTU[TUX\VT^c

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-8 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

1937

Vol. 70, No. 7

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review

Correction 

In notice document E4–3911 

beginning on page 74 in the issue of 

Monday, January 3, 2005 make the 

following correction: 

On page 74, in the table, under the 

‘‘Period’’ heading, in the ninth entry ‘‘2/

31/04’’ should read ‘‘12/31/04 ’’.

[FR Doc. Z4–3911 Filed 1–10–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.K.F. and S.M.F.

, c hildren

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00328

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 0

- 26768

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

This is an accelerated appeal from a decree of termination. The record was due on May 8,

2017. The clerk’s record was filed on May 4, 2017, but no reporter’s record was filed. The court

reporter filed a notice that she had not received payme nt. On May 5, 2017, this Court issued a

letter advising appellant that our records indicated appellant was not entitled to proceed without

payment of costs and that the deadline to submit written proof from the court reporter of payment

for the reporter’s record was 5:00 p.m., May 15, 2017. No response was filed.

Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require

a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c) (stating that, if clerk’s record has

been filed, appellate court may consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a

reporter’s record).

Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than 2 0 days after the date of this order

.

Appellees’ brief will be due within 20 days after appell ants’ brief has been filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 23 , 2017
Esther URREA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jeffrey KOPLOW, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0303

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Dynamics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
E. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Charles E. Phillips
-------------------------------------------------
Charles E. Phillips,
Chief Financial Officer

July 15, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

26475 

Vol. 73, No. 91 

Friday, May 9, 2008 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2008–0175; Directorate 

Identifier 2007–CE–105–AD; Amendment 

39–15455; AD 2008–08–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Pacific 

Aerospace Limited Model 750XL 

Airplanes 

Correction 

In rule document E8–7167 beginning 

on page 19967 in the issue of Monday, 

April 14, 2008 make the following 

correction: 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

On page 19968, in § 39.13(f), in the 

second line, ‘‘service May 19, 2008’’ 

should read ‘‘service after May 19, 

2008’’. 

[FR Doc. Z8–7167 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRCX
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Sea-floor geology and topography offshore in northeastern Long Island Sound      

      November 26, 2013    

View Document

Datasets of gridded multibeam bathymetry, covering approximately 52.9 square kilometers, were used to interpret character and geology of the sea floor in northeastern Long Island Sound. Although originally collected for charting purposes during National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hydrographic survey H12012, these acoustic data and the sea-floor sampling and photography stations subsequently occupied to verify the acoustic data are interpreted (1) to define the composition and terrain of the seabed, (2) to provide information on sediment transport and benthic habitat, and (3) as part of an expanding series of studies that provide a fundamental framework for research and resource management (for example, cables, pipelines, and dredging) activities in this major east coast estuary.

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Long Island Sound
                  - Connecticut;New York
                  - Connecticut
                  - New York

View All **
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 09, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 09, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0136. WILLIAM ERIC HUMMEL v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

CR1200547
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of Vizario, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 9th day of October, 2003.


                                            By:  /s/  Stephen M. Siedow
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Stephen M. Siedow,
                                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Vizario, Inc. and will be retained by Vizario, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
Mohammed ROCHE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.