alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Underwater photographic reconnaissance and habitat data collection in the Florida Keys—A procedure for ground truthing remotely sensed bathymetric data      

      January 1, 2020    

View Report

Bathymetric geoprocessing analyses of the Florida Reef Tract have provided insights into trends of seafloor accretion and seafloor erosion over time and following major storm events. However, bathymetric surveys sometimes capture manmade structures and vegetation, which do not represent the desired bare-earth data. Therefore, ground truthing is essential to maintain the most accurate bathymetric data possible. Field procedures were developed in the Florida Reef Tract in order to quickly and accurately collect consistent imagery and habitat data across variable sites. Areas of significant elevation change were determined through elevation change analyses; these areas were targeted for ground truthing in order to check the reliability of the surveys. This report outlines the standard operating procedures for underwater photographic imagery and habitat data collection, as well as procedures for the storage of these photographs and associated metadata. These standard operating procedures ensure the reproducibility of photographic operations and habitat data collection in future field excursions, enable longitudinal visual comparisons alongside seafloor elevation change analyses, and also have the potential to be applied to similar studies in different coastal environments.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kimberly Yates, Ph.D.

##### Senior Research Oceanographer

St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center

kyates@usgs.gov

727-502-8059

## Related Content

#### Kimberly Yates, Ph.D.

##### Senior Research Oceanographer

St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center

kyates@usgs.gov

727-502-8059

### Study Area

### Contact

####               St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center          

600 4th Street SouthSt. Petersburg, FL33701United States

727-502-8000

727-502-8181

### Explore Search

                  - Forecasts and Models
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Florida Keys
                  - Florida

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 27346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10518]



Federal Register /Vol. 63, No. 95/Monday, May 18, 1998/Corrections

[[Page 27346]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-194-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 98-11818 appearing on page 24778, in the issue 
of Tuesday, May 5, 1998, make the following corrections:
    a. On page 24778, in the third column, the document heading should 
read as set forth above.
    b. On the same page, in the same column, above the first paragraph, 
``April 20, 1998.'' should read ``April 29, 1998.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In Re:

JORGE A DIAZ ,

Debtor.

____________________________/

Case No. 20-17050-AJC

Chapter 13

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the firm of KELLEY KRONENBERG ATTORNEYS AT LAW and files

this Notice of Appearance as counsel of record for ALLY BANK, a creditor in the above-styled

cause, and requests:

1. That its name be added to the Matrix as:

ALLY BANK 

c/o KELLEY KRONENBERG ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1511 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 400

Tampa, FL 33607

2. That it be provided copies of all pleadings filed herein.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA AND I AM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADDITIONAL

QUALIFICATIONS TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT SET FORTH IN LOCAL RULE 2090-1(A).

/s/DAVID E. HICKS, ESQ.

DAVID E. HICKS, ESQ.

Fla. Bar No. 0368245

KELLEY KRONENBERG ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1511 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 400

Tampa, FL 33607

(813) 223-1697

(813) 433-5275 (fax)

E-mail: dhicks@kelleykronenberg.com

Attorneys for ALLY BANK 

Case 20-17050-AJC Doc 16 Filed 07/15/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Notice of Appearance was

furnished by either Electronic or U.S. Mail to the parties listed below on this 15thday of July,

2020.

/s/DAVID E. HICKS, ESQ.

ATTORNEY

Jorge A Diaz

18932 NW 63rd Court Circle

Hialeah, FL 33015-4732

Robert Sanchez, Esq.

355 W. 49 St.

Hialeah, FL 33012

Nancy K. Neidich, Trustee

P.O. Box 279806

Miramar, FL 33027

Case 20-17050-AJC Doc 16 Filed 07/15/20 Page 2 of 2
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2562

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United

States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of

Arkansas.

Brent Loy, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 27, 1997

 Filed: December 29,

1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Brent Loy pleaded guilty to possessing with

intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1), the district court sentenced Loy to 60

1

months imprisonment and three years supervised release.

Loy appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court
-2-

erred in including in his drug quantity 200 pounds of

marijuana attributed to him in his presentence report

(PSR), in denying him an acceptance-of-
-3-

responsibility adjustment, and in denying him a downward

departure based upon his health problems. 

Loy waived at sentencing his objection to the PSR&s

attribution to him of the 200 pounds of marijuana, which

was based upon a statement Loy gave to an investigator;

hence, he cannot now challenge that fact, see United

States v. Hipolito-Sanchez, 998 F.2d 594, 596 (8th Cir.

1993) (per curiam), and the district court did not

clearly err in its drug quantity determination, see

United States v. LaRoche, 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir.

1996). It also appears that Loy abandoned his objection

to the denial of an acceptance-of-responsibility

reduction, but in any event, the district court did not

clearly err in denying Loy the adjustment, as he

continued to use drugs during pretrial supervision. See

United States v. Byrd, 76 F.3d 194, 195 (8th Cir. 1996);

United States v. Poplawski, 46 F.3d 42, 43 (8th Cir.),

cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1109 (1995). As to Loy&s downward

departure argument, we cannot review the district court&s

decision not to depart, as its remarks at sentencing

sufficiently evince its recognition of its authority to

do so. See United States v. Jackson, 56 F.3d 959, 960-61

(8th Cir. 1995). 

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Joseph BELCIK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS





Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act





I, Eran Broshy, Chief Executive Officer of Ventiv Health, Inc., certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ventiv Health, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.














DATE: March 12, 2004

By:

/ S /    ERAN BROSHYEran Broshy
Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Outplanting Wyoming big sagebrush following wldfire: stock performance and economics      

      December 3, 2013    

Finding ecologically and economically effective ways to establish matrix species is often critical for restoration success. Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata subsp. wyomingensis) historically dominated large areas of western North America, but has been extirpated from many areas by large wildfires; its re-establishment in these areas often requires active management. We evaluated the performance (survival, health) and economic costs of container and bare-root stock based on operational plantings of more than 1.5 million seedlings across 2 200 ha, and compared our plantings with 30 other plantings in which sagebrush survival was tracked for up to 5 yr. Plantings occurred between 2001 and 2007, and included 12 combinations of stock type, planting amendment, and planting year.We monitored 10 500 plants for up to 8 yr after planting. Survival to Year 3 averaged 21% and was higher for container stock (30%) than bare-root stock (17%). Survival did not differ among container stock plantings, whereas survival of bare-root stock was sometimes enhanced by a hydrogel dip before planting, but not bymycorrhizal amendments. Most mortality occurred during the first year after planting; this period is the greatest barrier to establishment of sagebrush stock. The proportion of healthy stock in Year 1 was positively related to subsequent survival to Year 3. Costs were minimized, and survival maximized, by planting container stock or bare-root stock with a hydrogel dip. Our results indicate that outplanting is an ecologically and economically effective way of establishing Wyoming big sagebrush. However, statistical analyses were limited by the fact that data about initial variables (stock quality, site conditions, weather) were often unrecorded and by the lack of a replicated experimental design. Sharing consistent data and using an experimental approach would help land managers and restoration practitioners maximize the success of outplanting efforts.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David A Pyke

##### Scientist Emeritus

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

david_a_pyke@usgs.gov

541-750-0989

## Related Content

#### David A Pyke

##### Scientist Emeritus

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

david_a_pyke@usgs.gov

541-750-0989

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Washington

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           U.S. Geological Survey Core Research Center: A gateway to subsurface discovery for geoscience research      

      November 29, 2023    

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) operates the Core Research Center (CRC) in Denver, Colorado, USA, a public access repository of rock cores from over 9800 wells and drill cuttings from over 53 000 wells, primarily from states in or adjacent to the Rocky Mountain Region. Annually, approximately 1400 visitors use the collection for traditional and innovative research.

The CRC has an online, searchable database which includes downloadable core photos, analytical data, and thin-section images. When visitors sample for analyses, the results must be returned to the CRC for public dissemination providing immediate, free access to users while sparing the finite, irreplaceable collection from redundant testing. A representative quantity of every core depth is preserved in perpetuity.

Studies on CRC materials, paired with new extraction methods, have unlocked new productive deposits. Materials drilled and curated decades ago remain in high demand while materials receiving little attention today may be crucial for future research.

The collection provides immediate, inexpensive access to subsurface materials at a fraction of the cost of new drilling, sparing money, time and environmental impacts.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States

View All **
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0419 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE SPANGLER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 28, 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2024

07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0419
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles E. Phillips, President and Chief Financial Officer of Eye Dynamics,
Inc., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Eye
Dynamics, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

                  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during this period in which the quarterly report
         is being prepared;

                  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
         date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
         our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                  a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
         to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

                  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/ Charles E. Phillips
---------------------------
Charles E. Phillips
President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4952 

To impose a deadline by which a person whose Federal firearms license 

has expired, or is surrendered, or revoked, must liquidate the firearms 

inventory of any business subject to the license, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2016 

Mr. RUSSELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To impose a deadline by which a person whose Federal 

firearms license has expired, or is surrendered, or revoked, must liquidate the firearms inventory of any business subject to the license, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Federal Firearms 

5 Licensing Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4952 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR LIQUIDATION OF FIREARMS BUSI2 NESS INVENTORY AFTER EXPIRATION, SUR3 RENDER, OR REVOCATION OF FEDERAL FIRE4 ARMS LICENSE. 

5 Section 923 of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(m)(1)(A) A person whose license issued under this 

8 chapter has expired, or is surrendered or revoked, shall 

9 liquidate the firearms inventory of any business subject 

10 to the license, by the end of the period described in sub11 paragraph (B). During that period, the license shall con12 tinue to be considered valid. 

13 ‘‘(B) The period described in this subparagraph is the 

14 60-day period beginning with the effective date of the expi15 ration, surrender, or revocation, plus such additional pe16 riod as the Attorney General may allow on a showing of 

17 reasonable cause. 

18 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to 

19 a person if a United States district court for the judicial 

20 district in which the person resides or in which the prin21 cipal place of business of the person subject to the license 

22 is located finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the 

23 continued operation by the person of the business poses 

24 an immediate and grave threat to public safety.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4952 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF WILLFULLY. 

2 Section 923(e) of title 18, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(5) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘will5 fully’ means, with respect to conduct of a person, that the 

6 person knew of a legal duty, and engaged in the conduct 

7 knowingly and in intentional disregard of the duty. Repeti8 tion of a recordkeeping violation, regardless of frequency, 

9 shall not be considered evidence that the licensee com10 mitted the violation knowingly and in intentional disregard 

11 of a legal duty.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES BANKRUTPCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

Julio C Chirino Case No. 20-22980-AJC

Debtor. Chapter 13

_________________________/

MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE [ECF NO. 26]

COMES NOW, the Debtor, Yanitza Hernandez by and through her undersigned 

counsel and file this Motion to Vacate Order Sustaining Objection to Claim [ECF No. 26]

and as grounds states as follows: 

1. On or about November 30, 2020, the instant case was filed. 

2. On or about February 2, 2021, the Court entered an Order Sustaining

Objection to Claim of Internal Revenue Service [# 2-1].

3. The Internal Revenue Service filed an amended Proof of Claim at 2-2 that 

conforms to the Debtor’s Fifth Amended Plan. 

WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel prays that this Honorable Court enter an 

Order Vacating Order Sustaining Objection to Claim [ECF No. 26].

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional 

qualifications to practice in this Court as set forth in Local Rule 910(A). 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY, that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

sent via ecf and U.S. Mail this 21st day of May 2021: to all parties on the service list.

Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 63 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully Submitted: 

ROBERT SANCHEZ, P.A. 

Attorney for Debtor

355 W 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Tel. 305-687-8008

By:/s/ Robert Sanchez_____________

 Robert Sanchez, Esq., FBN#0442161

Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 63 Filed 05/21/21 Page 2 of 2