alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Why earthquakes correlate weakly with the solid Earth tides: Effects of periodic stress on the rate and probability of earthquake occurrence      

      January 1, 2003    

We provide an explanation why earthquake occurrence does not correlate well with the daily solid Earth tides. The explanation is derived from analysis of laboratory experiments in which faults are loaded to quasiperiodic failure by the combined action of a constant stressing rate, intended to simulate tectonic loading, and a small sinusoidal stress, analogous to the Earth tides. Event populations whose failure times correlate with the oscillating stress show two modes of response; the response mode depends on the stressing frequency. Correlation that is consistent with stress threshold failure models, e.g., Coulomb failure, results when the period of stress oscillation exceeds a characteristic time tn; the degree of correlation between failure time and the phase of the driving stress depends on the amplitude and frequency of the stress oscillation and on the stressing rate. When the period of the oscillating stress is less than tn, the correlation is not consistent with threshold failure models, and much higher stress amplitudes are required to induce detectable correlation with the oscillating stress. The physical interpretation of tn is the duration of failure nucleation. Behavior at the higher frequencies is consistent with a second-order dependence of the fault strength on sliding rate which determines the duration of nucleation and damps the response to stress change at frequencies greater than 1/tn. Simple extrapolation of these results to the Earth suggests a very weak correlation of earthquakes with the daily Earth tides, one that would require >13,000 earthquakes to detect. On the basis of our experiments and analysis, the absence of definitive daily triggering of earthquakes by the Earth tides requires that for earthquakes, tn exceeds the daily tidal period. The experiments suggest that the minimum typical duration of earthquake nucleation on the San Andreas fault system is ???1 year.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Nicholas (Nick) M Beeler

##### Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

nbeeler@usgs.gov

360-993-8987

#### David A Lockner

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

dlockner@usgs.gov

650-858-2529

## Related Content

#### Nicholas (Nick) M Beeler

##### Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

nbeeler@usgs.gov

360-993-8987

#### David A Lockner

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

dlockner@usgs.gov

650-858-2529

### Contacts

#### Nicholas (Nick) M Beeler

##### Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

nbeeler@usgs.gov

360-993-8987
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer  fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

May 12, 2004
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 24, 2005)]
[Corrections]
[Page 29829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z5-2383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-51665; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-23]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change 
To Seek Permanent Approval of the Pilot Relating to the Allocation 
Policy for Trading of Exchange-Traded Funds on an Unlisted Trading 
Privileges Basis (NYSE Rule 103B)

Correction

    In notice document E5-2383 beginning on page 25637 in the issue of 
Friday, May 13, 2005, make the following correction:
    On page 25639, in the third column, under the heading ``Paper 
comments'', in the second paragraph, in the last line, ``June 6, 2005'' 
should read ``June 3, 2005''.

[FR Doc. Z5-2383 Filed 5-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT
31.1




Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002




I, John
R. Signorello, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended June 30,
2010;




2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;




3.
     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
     The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and
have:




(a)        designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;




(b)        evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)        disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting.




5.
     The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a)        all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b)        any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
August 16, 2010




By:
              /s/
      John R. SignorelloJohn
      R. SignorelloChief
      Executive Officer, principal executive officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Riverbank stability assessment of lower Osage River during hydro-peak flow events: The lower Osage River case (Missouri, USA)      

      May 26, 2020    

The fluctuation of water level downstream from dams due to hydropower flow releases can negatively affect riverbank stability. This research aims to investigate riverbank instability resulting from the outflow variation of hydropower plants, using Bagnell Dam and the lower Osage River (Missouri, USA) as the basis of analysis. The effects of the water releases from the Bagnell Dam were investigated by computing a series of safety factors in relation to outflow events for 78 cross sections along the 130-km stretch of the lower Osage River using the BSTEM algorithm integrated into the HEC-RAS model package. The results showed that the rate of change in the flow magnitude at each cross section impacts the calculated safety factor. The flow release fluctuations will change the value of the safety factor along the river over time, as the safety factor value closely follows the variation in the flow rate. Also, the results show that the cross sections closer to Bagnell Dam are subjected to be more unstable than those farther downstream of Osage River.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Robert Holmes, Jr., Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, F.EWRI, D.WRE (Former Employee)          

##### Chief, Hydrodynamics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

##### Chief, Water Cycle Branch (acting)

Water Resources Mission Area

## Related Content

####             Robert Holmes, Jr., Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, F.EWRI, D.WRE (Former Employee)          

##### Chief, Hydrodynamics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

##### Chief, Water Cycle Branch (acting)

Water Resources Mission Area

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - osage river
                  - missouri

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(16)
              - (-)california(3)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Potential for critical mineral deposits in Maine, USA      

      June 28, 2022    

An analysis of the potential for deposits of critical minerals and elements in Maine presented here includes data and discussions for antimony, beryllium, cesium, chromium, cobalt, graphite, lithium, manganese, niobium, platinum group elements, rhenium, rare earth elements, tin, tantalum, tellurium, titanium, uranium, vanadium, tungsten, and zirconium. Deposits are divided into two groups based on geological settings and common ore-deposit terminology. One group consists of known deposits (sediment-hosted manganese, volcanogenic massive sulphide, porphyry copper-molybdenum, mafic- and ultramafic-hosted nickel-copper [-cobalt-platinum group elements], pegmatitic lithium-cesium-tantalum) that are in most cases relatively large, well-documented, and have been explored extensively in the past. The second, and much larger group of different minerals and elements, comprises small deposits, prospects, and occurrences that are minimally explored or unexplored. The qualitative assessment used in this study relies on three key criteria: (1) the presence of known deposits, prospects, or mineral occurrences; (2) favourable geologic settings for having certain deposit types based on current ore deposit models; and (3) geochemical anomalies in rocks or stream sediments, including panned concentrates. Among 20 different deposit types considered herein, a high resource potential is assigned only to three: (1) sediment-hosted manganese, (2) mafic- and ultramafic-hosted nickel-copper(-cobalt-platinum group elements), and (3) pegmatitic lithium-cesium-tantalum. Moderate potential is assigned to 11 other deposit types, including: (1) porphyry copper-molybdenum (-rhenium, selenium, tellurium, bismuth, platinum group elements); (2) chromium in ophiolites; (3) platinum group elements in ophiolitic ultramafic rocks; (4) granite-hosted uranium-thorium; (5) tin in granitic plutons and veins; (6) niobium, tantalum, and rare earth elements in alkaline intrusions; (7) tungsten and bismuth in polymetallic veins; (8) vanadium in black shales; (9) antimony in orogenic veins and replacements; (10) tellurium in epithermal deposits; and (11) uranium in peat.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### John F. Slack

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

jfslack@usgs.gov

703-648-6337

## Related Content

#### John F. Slack

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

jfslack@usgs.gov

703-648-6337

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Florence Bascom Geoscience Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

703-648-5953

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - maine

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(5)
              - tennessee(1)

## By Year

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Collection

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cores

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections

Human Capital        September 19, 2018        Dave Roddy
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) by National Coal Corp. (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: April 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel A. Roling   
|                    |  |  |  | Daniel A. Roling       
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | 
|Date: April 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael R. Castle  
|                    |  |  |  | Michael R. Castle      
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 204 (Thursday, October 22, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 56707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11022]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 204 / Thursday, October 22, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 56707]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-6175-8]
RIN 2060-AF29


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; 
Proposed Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Emissions From 
Ferroalloys Production

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-27406 appearing on page 54646 in the 
issue of Tuesday, October 13, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 54646, in the first column, in the DATES section, ``October 
4, 1998'' should read ``November 4, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin Berns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
----------------
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006
|   | I, Pierre-François Riolacci, certify that: |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment N° 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Veolia Environnement; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:  June 8, 2012 |
|--------|-------------------------------|

| By:   |  /s/ Pierre-François Riolacci |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|            | Name: Pierre-François Riolacci     |
|            | Title: Chief Finance Officer            |
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           What makes wildfires destructive in California?      

      August 31, 2022    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jon Keeley

##### Senior Scientist, ST

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

jon_keeley@usgs.gov

559-565-3170

## Related Content

#### Jon Keeley

##### Senior Scientist, ST

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

jon_keeley@usgs.gov

559-565-3170

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
Steven MISHAAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Solita Cohen DE MISHAAN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0323

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 1 of 7

Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 2 of 7

Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 3 of 7

Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 4 of 7

Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 5 of 7

Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 6 of 7

Case 20-19827-RAM    Doc 80    Filed 02/07/22    Page 7 of 7
Otis Lee HAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2269

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 21-11213-MAM Doc 39 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 21-11213-MAM Doc 39 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 21-11213-MAM Doc 39 Filed 04/21/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 21-11213-MAM Doc 39 Filed 04/21/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 21-11213-MAM Doc 39 Filed 04/21/21 Page 5 of 5
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3092

___________

Technical Ordnance, Inc., *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Minnesota.

Hartford Accident and Indemnity *

Insurance Company, sued as Hartford * [UNPUBLISHED]

Accident and Indemnity Company, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 12, 1999

Filed: May 20, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Insurance Company (Hartford) appeals the

district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Technical Ordnance, Inc.'s action

to recover defense costs under a policy of insurance issued by Hartford. We review a

grant of summary judgment under a well-established standard. Because this is a

diversity action, we review de novo questions of state law. Having considered the

record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court correctly applied the

controlling state law and the record supports the district court's ruling. We also
-2-

conclude a comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack precedential value.

We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael Schaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/ Michael Schaffer

/s/ Lawrence SchafferBy: Michael Schaffer

Chief Executive Officer

September 15 , 2010

By: Lawrence Schaffer

Chief Financial Officer

September 15 , 2010