alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

72693 

Vol. 70, No. 233 

Tuesday, December 6, 2005 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services; Overview 

Information; National Institute on 

Disability and Rehabilitation Research 

(NIDRR)—Research Fellowships 

Program; Notice Inviting Applications 

for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 

2006 

Correction 

In notice document E5–6724 

beginning on page 72111 in the issue of 

Thursday, December 1, 2005, make the 

following correction: 

On page 72111, in the second column, 

under the Dates: heading, in the second 

line, ‘‘January 30, 2006’’ should read 

‘‘Deadline for Transmittal of 

Applications: January 30, 2006’’. 

[FR Doc. Z5–6724 Filed 12–5–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Susan ROSENBERG, Appellant, v. CALUSA POINT ASSOCIATION, INC. & Dep't of Economic Opportunity, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Kirk
Rowland, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Findex.com, Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report;
 
 4.
    The
      registran’'s
      other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:
 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s
      disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
      the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation
      Date”);
      and
 
 c)
    presented
      in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date;
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s
      other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation, to the registrant’s
      auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant’s
      ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
      identified for the registrant’s
      auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
      internal controls; and
 
 6.
    The
      registrant’s
      other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
      whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
      other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
      to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
      actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date:
      April 15, 2005
    By
    /s/
      Kirk RowlandKirk
      RowlandChief
      Financial Officer
1 of 1

*7/22/2021

**11/9/2021

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

CASE NO.: 21-14668-LMI

CHAPTER: 13

Norton Alejandro Ruiz

Debtor. /

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE BY ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR WITH LOCAL 

RULE 2083-1(B) CLAIMS REVIEW REQUIREMENT

The undersigned attorney for Debtor certifies that a review of the claims register and all

claims filed in the above referenced case has been completed in accordance with Local Rule 

2083-1(B) and that:

1) ◼ No further action is necessary.

2) The following actions have been taken:

☐ The debtor has filed an objection to proof of claim .

☐ The debtor has filed an plan to provide for the proof of claim 

filed by .

☐ Other:________________.

A copy of this Notice of Compliance was served on the Chapter 13 Trustee via the NEC

and the Debtor via U.S. Mail on December 20, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Patrick L. Cordero, P.A.

Attorney for Debtor

7333 Coral Way 

Miami, Florida 33155

Tel: (305) 445-4855

/s/ (FILED ECF)

Miriam Marenco, Esq.

FL Bar No. 86115

Case 21-14668-LMI Doc 35 Filed 12/20/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated August 2, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-218550) of Smart Trust 332,
comprising Smart Trust, Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 14.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


August 2, 2017
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The study of the undiscovered mineral resources of the Tongass National Forest and adjacent lands, Southeastern Alaska      

      January 1, 1992    

The quantitative probabilistic assessment of the undiscovered mineral resources of the 17.1-million-acre Tongass National Forest (the largest in the United States) and its adjacent lands is a nonaggregated, mineral-resource-tract-oriented assessment designed for land-planning purposes. As such, it includes the renewed use of gross-in-place values (GIPV's) in dollars of the estimated amounts of metal contained in the undiscovered resources as a measure for land-use planning. Southeastern Alaska is geologically complex and contains a wide variety of known mineral deposits, some of which have produced important amounts of metals during the past 100 years. Regional geological, economic geological, geochemical, geophysical, and mineral exploration history information for the region was integrated to define 124 tracts likely to contain undiscovered mineral resources. Some tracts were judged to contain more than one type of mineral deposit. Each type of deposit may contain one or more metallic elements of economic interest. For tracts where information was sufficient, the minimum number of as-yet-undiscovered deposits of each type was estimated at probability levels of 0.95, 0.90, 0.50, 0.10, and 0.05. The undiscovered mineral resources of the individual tracts were estimated using the U.S. Geological Survey's MARK3 mineral-resource endowment simulator; those estimates were used to calculate GIPV's for the individual tracts. Those GIPV's were aggregated to estimate the value of the undiscovered mineral resources of southeastern Alaska. The aggregated GIPV of the estimates is $40.9 billion. Analysis of this study indicates that (1) there is only a crude positive correlation between the size of individual tracts and their mean GIPV's: and (2) the number of mineral-deposit types in a tract does not dominate the GIPV's of the tracts, but the inferred presence of synorogenic-synvolcanic nickel-copper, porphyry copper skarn-related, iron skarn, and porphyry copper-molybdenum deposits does. The influence of this study on the U.S. Forest Service planning process is yet to be determined. ?? 1992 Oxford University Press.

## Citation Information
Exhibit 32


                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

          The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer and the chief
financial  officer of First South Bancorp,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-Q of the registrant fully
complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934,  and that the  information  contained in the report fairly
presents,  in all  material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

November 30, 2006
                                            s/Barry L. Slider
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Barry L. Slider
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                           s/V. Lewis Shuler
                                           ---------------------------
                                           V. Lewis Shuler
                                           Chief Financial Officer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

38881

Vol. 63, No. 138

Monday, July 20, 1998

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[MD Docket No. 98-36; FCC 98-115]

Assessment and Collection of

Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 1998

Correction

In rule document 98–17222 beginning

on page 35847, in the issue of

Wednesday, July 1, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 35859, in the table, above §

1.1154, insert ‘‘4. Section 1.1154 is

revised to read as follows:’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 918

[SPATS No. LA-017-FOR]

Louisiana Regulatory Program

Correction

In rule document 98–12249 beginning

on page 25391, in the issue of Friday,

May 8, 1998, make the following

corrections:

1. On page 25393, in the first column,

under the heading, E. Section 5333.

Hydrologic Balance: Impoundments, in

the sixth line, ‘‘(120’’ should read

‘‘(210’’.

2. On page 25394, in the table, in the

third column, the second line, ‘‘A.2a.,’’

should read ‘‘A.2.a.,’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin Berns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
----------------
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer

October 24, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 71343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-71224]



[[Page 71343]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

12 CFR Part 10

[Docket No. 98-08]
RIN 1557-AB62


Municipal Securities Dealers

Correction

    In rule document 98-14016, corrected at page 35309 in the issue of 
Monday, June 29, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec.  10.2  [Corrected]

    On page 29094, in the second column, in Sec.  10.2 (a), the second 
sentence should be removed.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 7050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trades Zone Board
[Docket A(32b)-1-96]


Foreign-Trade Zone 87--Lake Charles, LA, Subzone 87A, Conoco, 
Inc.; Request for Modification of Restrictions (Oil Refinery Complex)

Correction

    In notice document 96-1997 beginning on page 3669 in the issue of 
Thursday, February 1, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 3670, in the first column, in the last line, ``March 30, 
1996'' should read ``March 4, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
AAM-12-296-E 

April 11, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10501 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0380 

Mr. Thomas Davis 

Crystal Aero Group, Inc. 

P.O. Box 2050 

Crystal River, FL 34423 

Dear Mr. Davis: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Crystal Aero Group, Inc. (Crystal Aero Group), for an exemption from part 120 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Crystal Aero Group, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Crystal Aero Group. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Crystal Aero Group, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Crystal Aero Group, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Crystal Aero Group are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Crystal Aero Group part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 99.1

          The following certification isprovided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Saxon Capital, Inc. on the basis of such officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

**CERTIFICATION**

          Inconnection with the Annual Report of Saxon Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Michael L.Sawyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |   | /s/ MICHAEL L. SAWYER                                                                                                                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|   |   | **Michael L. Sawyer**                                                                                                                                |
|   |   | **Chief Executive Officer March 25, 2003**                                                                                                           |
|        |        |                                                                                                                                                      |  |  |
Exhibit "E"

Case 20-13438-SMG    Doc 9-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 1 of 4

Case 20-13438-SMG    Doc 9-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 2 of 4

Case 20-13438-SMG    Doc 9-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 3 of 4

Case 20-13438-SMG    Doc 9-5    Filed 03/19/20    Page 4 of 4
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2455

_____________________________
J OSHUA T ROY D OOLY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. May 6, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The State properly concedes that the trial court lacked jurisdiction in this case to revoke Appellant’s probation and resentence him because he had already served the statutory maximum time on probation before the filing of the probation violation affidavit. Tate v. State , 191 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to discharge Appellant in Escambia County circuit court case number 20 08

- CF

- 00 6266

- B

. Id.

R EVERSED and R EMANDED with directions

. R OWE , J AY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
1 King, Melanie

From: King, Melanie

Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:51 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Hi Cortney, we will add the footnote we discussed earlier to the table(s). Please let me know if this will

address all of the interagency comments.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Vulnerability assessment of a port and harbor community to earthquake and tsunami hazards: Integrating technical expert and stakeholder input      

      December 31, 2002    

Research suggests that the Pacific Northwest could experience catastrophic earthquakes and tsunamis in the near future, posing a significant threat to the numerous ports and harbors along the coast. A collaborative, multiagency initiative is underway to increase the resiliency of Pacific Northwest ports and harbors to these hazards, involving Oregon Sea Grant, Washington Sea Grant, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Services Center, and the U.S. Geological Survey Center for Science Policy. One element of this research, planning, and outreach initiative is a natural hazard mitigation and emergency preparedness planning process that combines technical expertise with local stakeholder values and perceptions. This paper summarizes and examines one component of the process, the vulnerability assessment methodology, used in the pilot port and harbor community of Yaquina River, Oregon, as a case study of assessing vulnerability at the local level. In this community, stakeholders were most concerned with potential life loss and other nonstructural vulnerability issues, such as inadequate hazard awareness, communication, and response logistics, rather than structural issues, such as damage to specific buildings or infrastructure.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Nathan J Wood, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

nwood@usgs.gov

503-251-3291

## Related Content

#### Nathan J Wood, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

nwood@usgs.gov

503-251-3291

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon

View All **
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2937

_____________________________
L INDSEY K AYE H UCK , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

. January 10, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.