alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 21-13441-BKC-LMI

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

LIZ ECHEVARRIA

_____________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING CONFIRMATION HEARING AND MAKING ALL DEBTOR PAYMENTS 

NON-REFUNDABLE

THIS CASE came to be heard on September 9, 2021 upon the Confirmation Hearing of the Chapter 

13 Case, and based on the record, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

DEBTOR

1. The Confirmation Hearing is continued to October 12, 2021 at 1:35 pm. The hearing will be 

conducted by video conference. For instructions, please refer to the General Procedures for 

Hearings By Video Conference on the Court’s website. To participate in the hearing, you must 

register for the video conference no later than 3:00 pm one business day before the date of the 

hearing. To participate, click on the following link or manually enter the following link in a 

browser: 

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItduiqqz4iGPWRbYC6YTes9xqj5mxBNU4

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 24, 2021.

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 47 Filed 09/27/21 Page 1 of 2
 ORDER CONTINUING CONFIRMATION HEARING AND MAKING ALL DEBTOR PAYMENTS NON-REFUNDABLE

CASE NO.: 21-13441-BKC-LMI

2. The Debtor is ordered to continue making payments each month to the Chapter 13 Trustee in 

accordance with the last filed Chapter 13 Plan. Failure to continue payments may result in the 

dismissal of this case.

3. As a condition for the continued confirmation hearing and delay of payments to creditors, all 

payments held by the Chapter 13 Trustee shall be non-refundable and held in trust for the secured 

creditors as adequate protection, and in trust for priority and administrative creditors.

If this case is dismissed or converted, the Trustee shall disburse all funds which were received 

prior to the order of conversion or dismissal and held in trust. The disbursement shall be on a pro 

rata basis, less Trustee fees, to the secured, priority or administrative creditors pursuant to the 

proposed Chapter 13 Plan which was filed at least one day prior to last confirmation hearing date.

4.

###

ORDER SUBMITTED BY:

NANCY K. NEIDICH

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

LIZ ECHEVARRIA

7905 EAST DRIVE, #15-B

NORTH BAY VILLAGE, FL 33141

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

JOSE BLANCO, ESQUIRE

102 E 49TH ST

HIALEAH, FL 33013

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 47 Filed 09/27/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 181 (Friday, September 18, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10918]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 181 / Friday, September 18, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 49955]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Orders Eligible for Post-execution Allocation

Correction

    In rule document 98-22933 beginning on page 45699, in the issue of 
Thursday, August 27, 1998, make the following corrections:


Sec.  1.35  [Corrected]

    1. On page 45710, in the second column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(i)(D), in the 13th line, ``provided'' should read ``provided''.
    2. On page 45710, in the third column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(ii)(H), in the first line, ``government'' should read 
``governmental''.
    3. On page 45710, in the third column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(ii)(H), in the fifth line, ``suparnational'' should read 
``supranational''.
    4. On page 45710, in the third column, in paragraph (a-
1)(5)(ii)(I), in the 7th line, ``behalf:'' should read ``behalf;''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6634

BILLY G. ASEMANI,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MAHMOOD AHMADINEJAD, (Former Head of the Iranian 

Revolutionary Guard Corps in Tehran); GHOLAM-NEZI NAQDI, 

Brigadier General (Former Senior Tehran Police Official); 

ALI KHAMENEI, (The “Supreme” Leader of the Islamic 

Revolution),

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-00874-RDB)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 3, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his action under the Alien Torts Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 

1350 (2006) and the Torture Victim Protection Act, P.L. 102-256, 

106 Stat. 73. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Asemani v. Ahmadinejad, No. 1:10-cv-00874-RDB (D. Md. 

Apr. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO: 21-14668-BKC-LMI

NORTON ALEJANDRO RUIZ,

 DEBTOR(S).

 /

ORDER DISMISSING CHAPTER 13 CASE

THIS CASE came on to be heard on February 1, 2022, for the Trustee’s 

Motion to Dismiss Case (ECF #38), and based on the record, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

1. This case is hereby dismissed from the date hereof as pending 

issues with (ECF #38) was not resolved by the seven day deadline 

given. 

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

3. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the 

administrative closing of the case.

4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the 

Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse, 301 

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 10, 2022.

Case 21-14668-LMI Doc 41 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 2
2

North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the balance 

of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017-2(E). Any funds 

remaining with the trustee shall be applied to this balance and the 

trustee must dispose of any funds in accordance with the Bankruptcy 

Code, and Local Rule 1017-2(F), unless otherwise ordered by the court. 

The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this 

order unless all unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

5. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed 

case must be filed in accordance with the requirements of Local Rule 

9013-1(E).

6. The clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept for filing 

any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling 

violates a prior order of the court or if the petition is accompanied 

by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments and filing fees 

remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

###

PREPARED BY:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

THE CLERK OF COURT is directed to serve a copy of this Order on interested 

parties who do not receive service by CM/ECF, and file a proof of 

such service within two (2) business days from entry of the Order.

Case 21-14668-LMI Doc 41 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 2
February 28, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BOBBY JOSEPH JOHNSON, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00818-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of 

appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Using geospatial analysis to guide marsh restoration in Chesapeake Bay and beyond      

      September 13, 2023    

Coastal managers are facing imminent decisions regarding the fate of coastal wetlands, given ongoing threats to their persistence. There is a need for objective methods to identify which wetland parcels are candidates for restoration, monitoring, protection, or acquisition due to limited resources and restoration techniques. Here, we describe a new spatially comprehensive data set for Chesapeake Bay salt marshes, which includes the unvegetated-vegetated marsh ratio, elevation metrics, and sediment-based lifespan. Spatial aggregation across regions of the Bay shows a trend of increasing deterioration with proximity to the seaward boundary, coherent with conceptual models of coastal landscape response to sea-level rise. On a smaller scale, the signature of deterioration is highly variable within subsections of the Bay: fringing, peninsular, and tidal river marsh complexes each exhibit different spatial patterns with regards to proximity to the seaward edge. We then demonstrate objective methods to use these data for mapping potential management options on to the landscape, and then provide methods to estimate lifespan and potential changes in lifespan in response to restoration actions as well as future sea level rise. We account for actions that aim to increase sediment inventories, revegetate barren areas, restore hydrology, and facilitate salt marsh migration into upland areas. The distillation of robust geospatial data into simple decision-making metrics, as well as the use of those metrics to map decisions on the landscape, represents an important step towards science-based coastal management.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Neil Kamal Ganju, PhD

##### Research Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

nganju@usgs.gov

508-457-2252

#### Kate Ackerman

##### Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

kackerman@usgs.gov

508-457-2331

#### Zafer  Defne, PhD

#####  Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

zdefne@usgs.gov

508-457-2254

## Related Content

#### Neil Kamal Ganju, PhD

##### Research Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

nganju@usgs.gov

508-457-2252

#### Kate Ackerman

##### Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

kackerman@usgs.gov

508-457-2331

#### Zafer  Defne, PhD

#####  Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

zdefne@usgs.gov

508-457-2254

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Maps and Mapping
                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Chesapeake Bay area

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 11953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No. 961210346-7035-02; I.D. 120596A]
RIN 0648-XX76


Summer Flounder Fishery; Final Specifications for 1997; 
Adjustment to 1997 State Quotas; Commercial Quota Harvested for 
Delaware

Correction

    In rule document 97-5698, beginning on page 10473 in the issue of 
Friday, March 7, 1997, make the following corrections;
    1. On page 10474, in Table 2, under the state of Massachusetts, in 
the third column under ``Initial 1997 quota'', ``757,8413'', should 
read ``757,841''.
    2. On page 10474, in Table 2, under the state of Massachusetts, in 
the fourth column under ``Initial 1997 quota'', ``43,751'' should read 
``343,751''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES EDWARD COFFEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-6796

CHARLES EDWARD COFFEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-98-192-V, CA-00-170-1-V, CA-00-170)

Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 19, 2001
2

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Coffey, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We recently held in United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139

(4th Cir. 2001), that the new rule announced in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to

cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Appellant’s Apprendi

claim is not cognizable.

3

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Coffey seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2000). In the first order appealed, the district court

denied Coffey’s motion to amend his action to add a claim based

upon the Supreme Court’s opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530

U.S. 466 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of this order substantially on the reasoning of the

district court.* See United States v. Coffey, Nos. CR-98-192-V;

CA-00-170-1-V (W.D.N.C. filed Jan. 30, 2001; entered Feb. 2, 2001).

In the second order, Coffey appeals from the district court’s final

order denying him relief under § 2255. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on

the reasoning of the district court. See Coffey v. United States,

Nos. CR-98-192-V; CA-00-170 (W.D.N.C. filed Apr. 19, 2001; entered

May 8, 2001).
4

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 169 (Friday, August 31, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 50467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-14937]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 169 / Friday, August 31, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 50467]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2005-22840; Amendment No. 25-121]
RIN 2120-AI14


Airplane Performance and Handling Qualities in Icing Conditions

Correction

    In rule document E7-14937 beginning on page 44656 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, make the following corrections:


Sec.  25.125  [Corrected]

    1. On page 44667, in the first column, in Sec.  
25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B), in the first line, ``V<INF>SR</INF>0'' should read 
``V<INF>SR0</INF>''.

Apendix C of Part 25 [Corrected]

    2. On page 44669, in the second column, in Appendix C of Part 25, 
in the third line, ``(-9( C)'' should read

``(-9[deg] C)''.

[FR Doc. Z7-14937 Filed 8-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>


                                        Exhibit 15


                             Harold Y. Spector, CPA
                              80 South Lake Avenue
                                   Suite 723
                               Pasadena, CA 91101




Eye Dynamics, Inc.
2301 205th Street, Suite 106
Torrance, California 90501

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of  Eye Dynamics, Inc. and subsidiary for the periods ended March
31, 2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated May 7, 2001; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements filed by you under the
Securities Act of 1933.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Harold Y. Spector, CPA
November 21, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 11, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 65266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11211]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 11, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 65266]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Housing Service
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Rural Utilities Service
Farm Service Agency

7 CFR Part 3550

RIN 0575--AB99


Reengineering and Reinvention of the Direct Section 502 and 504 
Single Family Housing (SFH) Programs

Correction

    In interim rule document 96-29777, beginning on page 59762, in the 
issue of Friday, November 22, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 59762, in the first column, in the ADDRESSES section, in 
the ninth line, ``comments'rus.usda.gov'' should read 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5a5a5a6aaa8a8a0abb1b685b7b0b6ebb0b6a1a4eba2aab3">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34575b5959515a4047744641471a414750551a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>''.


Sec. 3550.9  [Corrected]

    2. On page 59780, in the second column, in Sec. 3550.9(a), in the 
first line, ``Objective'' should read ``(a) Objective''.


Sec. 3550.10  [Corrected]

    3. On page 59780, in the third column, in Sec. 3550.10, in the 
first full paragraph, in the sixth line, ``4'' should read 
``Sec. 3550.54''.
    4. On page 59781, in the third column, in Sec. 3550.10, in the 
second line ``Legal alien.'' should denote a new paragraph and read 
``Legal alien.''


Sec. 3550.63  [Corrected]

    5. On page 59787, in the third column, in Sec. 3550.63(a), in the 
fifth line, ``7(a)'' should read ``Sec. 3550.57(a)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this quarterly report of Transax International
Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen Walters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Stephen Walters
-------------------
Stephen Walters
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2008
Aaron A. CAMERON and Sara D. Cameron, Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, as Trustee of the Residential Credit Opportunities Trust Series 2015-1, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1400

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 10, 2018

Aaron A. Cameron, pro se, Appellant.

Melisa Manganelli of Law Offices of Mandel, Manganelli & Leider, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *See**Rivas v. Bank of New York Mellon* , 244 So.3d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
I,  JAMES  C.  FIELDS,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LocatePlus Holdings
Corporation  for  the  period  ended  December  31,  2006.

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant  and  we  have:

     (A)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

     (B)   evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

(C)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.  The  registrant's  other  certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

(A)   all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

(B)   any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer

               May 1,  2007