alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 90 (Thursday, May 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27181-27182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11021]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Licenses

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Oregon 
State University of Corvallis, Oregon, an exclusive license to the 
blackberry variety named ``Columbia Star,'' an exclusive license to the 
strawberry variety named ``Sweet Sunrise,'' and an exclusive license to 
the strawberry variety named ``Charm.''

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 10, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's rights in these 
plant varieties are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. The

[[Page 27182]]

prospective exclusive licenses will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive licenses may be granted unless, within thirty 
(30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural 
Research Service receives written evidence and argument which 
establishes that the grant of these licenses would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Robert Griesbach,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-11021 Filed 5-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
Tlacey Al RANDALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 3, 2018

Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Tlacey Randall was found guilty by a jury of possession of marijuana and possession of cocaine (as a lesser-included offense of trafficking cocaine), and acquitted of possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced Randall to the maximum sentence of five years in prison for possessing cocaine. Under the facts presented, we agree with Randall that the trial court sentenced him improperly, by relying partly on the premise that he was trafficking cocaine at the time of the offense, a charge for which he had been acquitted. *See* *Drinkard v. State* , 177 So.3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We also agree that the trial court improperly relied on certain uncharged criminal activity in imposing sentence. *See* *Mosley v. State* , 198 So.3d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). Accordingly, we REVERSE Randall's sentence and REMAND for sentencing before a different judge.

Wolf, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4877 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3130 Grants Lake Boulevard in Sugar Land, Texas, as the ‘‘LCpl 

Garrett W. Gamble, USMC Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. OLSON (for himself, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. HURD of Texas, Mr. SMITH

of Texas, Mr. SESSIONS, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, 

Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BABIN, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. FLORES, Mr. RATCLIFFE, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. POE of Texas, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. GENE GREEN

of Texas, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, 

Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. 

MCCAUL, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. BARTON, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. 

VELA, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, and Mr. VEASEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3130 Grants Lake Boulevard in Sugar Land, 

Texas, as the ‘‘LCpl Garrett W. Gamble, USMC Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4877 IH

1 SECTION 1. LCPL GARRETT W. GAMBLE, USMC POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 3130 Grants Lake Boulevard in 

5 Sugar Land, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘LCpl Garrett W. Gamble, USMC Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘LCpl Garrett W. 

11 Gamble, USMC Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re:

Case No.: 19-23352-MAM

LUIS A. VINAS,

Chapter 11

Debtor.

______________________________/

ALLERGY, DERMATOLOGY & SKIN

CANCER LLC., and SIX ACES LLC.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Adv. No. 20-01095-MAM

LUIS A. VINAS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional 

qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true 

and correct copy of the (C.P. #20) Notice to Parties Setting Judicial Settlement 

Conference was furnished via CM/ECF if the party is a registered user on this case or 

by U.S. Mail to the parties on the attached mail list this 25th day of June, 2020.

KELLEY, FULTON & KAPLAN, P.L.

Attorneys for Defendant

1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.

The Forum - Suite 1000

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone No.: (561) 491-1200

Facsimile No.: (561) 684-3773

 

 By: /s/ Andrew Fulton, IV, Esquire

ANDREW FULTON IV, ESQ.

 Florida Bar No.: 833487

Case 20-01095-MAM Doc 21 Filed 06/25/20 Page 1 of 2
Mailing Information for Case 20-01095-MAM

Electronic Mail Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service for 

this case.

• Rachamin Cohen Rocky@lawcls.com, alex@lawcls.com

• Andrew Fulton IV andrew@kelleylawoffice.com, 

tina@kelleylawoffice.com;cassandra@kelleylawoffice.com;kristina@kelleylawoffice.com;

debbie@kelleylawoffice.com;dana@kelleylawoffice.com

Manual Notice List

The following is the list of parties who are not on the list to receive email notice/service for this

case (who therefore require manual noticing/service). You may wish to use your mouse to 

select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels 

for these recipients.

• (No manual recipients)

Case 20-01095-MAM Doc 21 Filed 06/25/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Liverpool crater

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(1)

## By Location

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2005        Geology of five small Australian impact craters
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Matthew Fitzgerald, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grant Prideco,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.     Date: August 9, 2004 Signature: /s/ Matthew D. Fitzgerald      Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Christopher PARRINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4231

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

35796

Vol. 60, No. 132

Tuesday, July 11, 1995

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 436

[FRL-5223-9]

National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System and Pretreatment

Programs; State and Local Assistance

Programs; Effluent Limitations

Guidelines and Standards; Public

Water Supply and Underground

Injection Control Programs: Removal

of Legally Obsolete or Redundant

Rules

Correction

In final rule document 95–15027

beginning on page 33926 in the issue of

Thursday, June 29, 1995 make the

following corrections:

§§436.22, 436.32, and 436.42 [Corrected]

1. On page 33967, in §§436.22,

436.32, and 436.42(a), the paragraph

designation (a), should be inserted

before ‘‘Except’’.

§§436.122, 436.132, 436.142, 436.152,

436.182, 436.192, 436.232, and 436.242

[Corrected]

2. On page 33968, in §§436.122,

436.132, 436.142, 436.152, 436.182,

436.192, 436.232, and 436.242(a), the

paragraph designation (a), should be

inserted before ‘‘Except’’.

§§436.252, 436.262, and 436.382

[Corrected]

3. On page 33969, in §§436.252,

436.262, and 436.382(a), the paragraph

designation (a), should be inserted

before ‘‘Except’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Intent to Repatriate Native

American Items in the Possession of

the Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth

College, Hanover, NH

Correction

In notice document 95–16402

beginning on page 35047 in the issue of

Wednesday, July 5, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 35048, in the first column, in

the last paragraph, beginning in the

ninth line, ‘‘[thirty days after the

publicatin date of this notice in the

FEDERAL REGISTER].’’ should read

‘‘August 4, 1995.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Exhibit
32.1

STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, Charles M. Sprock, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant).This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the Report).

By
execution of this statement, I certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                                 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Registrant as of the dates and for the periods covered by
 the Report.

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed
for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                     |                                      
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2010 | /s/ Charles M. Sprock                
|                     |                                      
|                     | Charles M. Sprock                    
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICROSOFT

MOBILE INC., HTC COR PORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., Appellees

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

______________________

2019

- 1178

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017

- 00890.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J USTIN J. O LIVER

, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by D ANIEL S. G LUECK

.

C HRISTINA J ORDAN M C C ULLOUGH

, Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for all appellees. Appellees Microsof tCorporation, Microsoft Mobile Inc. also represented by
C HAD S. C AMPBELL , Phoenix, AZ.

R YAN J. M C B RAYER , Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, for appellees HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc.

D ANA K AERSVANG

, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by D ENNIS F AN

, S COTT R. M C I NTOSH

, J OSEPH H. H UNT

, M ELISSA N. P ATTERSON ; T HOMAS W.

K RAUSE

, J OSEPH M ATAL

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED , Office of the Solicitor, Unite d States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, L OURIE

, and R EYNA

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. Se e Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 26, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004 (the "Report"), I, David Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, created by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 7, 2005            /s/ David Wilson
                               ----------------
                               David Wilson
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                               Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology, 1915      

      January 1, 1916    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - canada
                  -  United States

View All **
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7382

JOHN WILLIE MACK, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. E. JOYNER, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 9:18

- cv - 01136

- DCN )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019

Before KING, THACKER , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John Willie Mack, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Willie Mack, Jr., seeks to appeal the district cou rt’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (20 12). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstr ating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have inde pendently reviewed the record and conclude that Mack has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40113]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin Berns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer


August 18, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

36295

Vol. 63, No. 127

Thursday, July 2, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. GT98-56-000]

Iroquois Gas Transmission System,

L.P.; Notice of GRI Refunds

Correction

In notice document 98–17192,

appearing on page 35212, in the issue of

Monday, June 29, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 35212, in the first column,

the docket number is corrected to read

as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[Attorney General Order No. 2156-98]

RIN 1105-AA20

Revision of Freedom of Information

Act and Privacy Act Regulations and

Implementation of Electronic Freedom

of Information Act Amendments of

1996

Correction

In the issue of Monday, June 1, 1998,

on page 29598, in the first column, in

the correction of rule document 98–

14341, § 16.11(b)(7) should read as set

forth below:

§ 16.11 [Corrected]

* * * * *

(b)* * *

(7) Review means the examination of

a record located in response to a request

in order to determine whether any

portion of it is exempt from disclosure.

It also includes processing any record

for disclosure––for example, doing all

that is necessary to redact it and prepare

it for disclosure. Review costs are

recoverable even if a record ultimately

is not disclosed. Review time includes

time spent considering any formal

objection to disclosure made by a

business submitter under § 16.8, but

does not include time spent resolving

general legal or policy issues regarding

the application of exemptions.

* * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D