#1 Melter 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA 

Emissions Test Report

Prepared for: 

Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC 

Mount Vernon Plant 

100 Blackjack Rd. 

Mt. Vernon, OH 43050 

Project No. 10-3990.12 

December 1, 2010 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

2615 Wolcott Street 

Ferndale, Michigan 48220 

(248) 548-8070
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

i

Executive Summary

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production1

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the 41 Furnace process 

located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC (OC) site in Mount Vernon, Ohio: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. Table I on the following page summarizes the 

overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

ii

Table I 

41 Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hr) 

Emission Rate 

(lbs/ton glass) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 0.13 0.071 4.7 

Organic Condensible PM2.5 0.0071 0.0038 0.25 

Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 0.071 0.038 2.6 

September 28 & 29, 

2010 

Total PM2.5 0.21 0.11 7.5 

Filterable Particulate 1.19 0.64 44.5 

Antimony < 1.3E-5 < 7.0E-6 < 4.9E-4 

Arsenic 4.6E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3 

Beryllium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4 

Cadmium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4 

Chromium 4.5E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3 

Cobalt 1.1E-5 5.6E-6 4.0E-4 

Lead 3.4E-5 1.8E-5 1.3E-3 

Manganese 1.2E-4 6.2E-5 4.3E-3 

Nickel < 1.6E-5 < 8.7E-6 < 6.1E-4 

September 29 & 30, 

2010 

Selenium < 3.3E-5 < 1.7E-5 < 1.2E-3 

September 28, 2010 Mercury 2.9E-6 1.6E-6 9.9E-2 

September 29 & 30, 

2010 

Hexavalent Chromium < 2.1E-6 < 1.1E-6 < 7.7E-5 

September 28 & 29, Hydrogen Chloride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1 

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2 

3.2 PM AND PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 3 

3.3 TOTAL SELECTED METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................ 3 

3.4 HG CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................................... 4 

3.5 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................. 4 

3.6 HF AND HCL CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES..................................................... 4 

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 5

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – 41 Furnace Emissions Test Program Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – OTM 27/OTM 28 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 5 – Method 30B Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 6 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 7 – Method 26A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 8 – Method 316 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Detailed Test Run Results 

Appendix B – Process Data 

Appendix C – Field and Computer-Generated Data Sheets and Notes 

Appendix D – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix E – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

1

1.0 Introduction 

U.S. EPA has agreed with the North American Insulation Manufacturer’s Association (NAIMA) 

and its members to a voluntary collection of residual risk-related data for the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Mineral Wool Production3

 as well as for 

the NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing4. To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was retained by NAIMA to evaluate emission rates 

of the following pollutants from the one exhaust stack associated with the 41 Melter process 

located at the Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC (OC) site in Mount Vernon, Ohio: 

• Particulate matter (PM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) 

• Antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and 

selenium 

• Mercury 

• Hexavalent chromium 

• Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

Reference test methods used and test program methodologies were agreed upon by U.S. EPA and 

NAIMA prior to initiating test program fieldwork. The emissions test program was conducted on 

September 28, 29, and 30, 2010. The test program consisted of triplicate emission tests at each 

location for each parameter. The field sampling portion of the emissions test program included 

the personnel summarized by Table 1. 

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

James Sharp BTEC 

Jeff Peitzsch BTEC 

Paul Molenda BTEC 

John Beach BTEC 

Matthew Young BTEC 

Dave Jacobs Owens Corning 

Truskie Burson-Rager Owens Corning 

 

3

 Codified at Title 40, Part 63, Subpart DDD of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 63, Subpart DDD) 4

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

2

2.0 Process Description

#41 Furnace is a steel-shelled cold top electric melter which supplies thermal energy to the 

mixed glass batch via resistive heating from under glass electrodes. The furnace is equipped 

with a baghouse to control particulate emissions that are created from batch charging and glass 

volatiles that “boil” from the surface of the molten glass condensing in the exhaust stream 

forming small diameter particulate matter. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

During the emissions test program, the electric melt furnace was operated under normal 

conditions. In addition to production rate during each test run, process operating data recorded 

during the emissions test program included baghouse pressure drop and furnace operating 

temperature. Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control and/or additional 

production information will be available to the U.S. EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into six 

categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM and PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates; 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas total selected metals concentrations and emission rates; 

(4) Measurement of exhaust gas Hg concentrations and emission rates; 

(5) Measurement of exhaust gas hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates; 

and, 

(6) Measurement of exhaust gas HF and HCl concentrations and emission rates. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.6, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content was conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in 

Emissions from Stationary Sources”(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

3

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates either in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies used to evaluate some pollutant emission rates or as separate, 

discrete measurements conducted in support of the non-isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions will be within specified limits, therefore, a 

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) will be assigned. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A. The O2 content of the 

exhaust gas was measured using a M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer (or equivalent) 

and the CO2 content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments 

(CAI0 600 Series CO2 gas analyzer (or equivalent). An integrated sample of the gas stream was 

drawn through an insulated stainless-steel probe with an in-line glass fiber filter to remove any 

particulate and into a tedlar sample bag utilizing an evacuated sample lung. At the completion of 

each test the gas sample was introduced to the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second 

intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition software. A schematic drawing of the emission 

monitoring system is provided as Figure 2. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

be determined volumetrically (liquid impingers) and gravimetrically (silica gel impinger). 

3.2 PM and PM2.5 Concentrations and Emission Rates 

PM/PM2.5 concentrations and emission rates were measured using U.S. EPA Other Test 

Methods (OTM) 27 and OTM 28. PM, PM2.5, and CPM concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system will consisted of (1) a tapered nozzle, (2) a PM10 particle sizer cyclone followed by a 

PM2.5 particle sizer cyclone, (3) a glass or quartz fiber filter assembly and heated probe, (4) a 

glass recirculating ice water condenser system, (5) a set of four GS impingers, (6) a length of 

sample line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the second and third impingers were filled with 100 ml of 

HPLC water, the first and fourth impingers were empty, and the fifth impinger contained 

approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the PM2.5/CPM sample 

train is provided as Figure 3. The total filterable PM fraction was collected on the front half of 

the M29 Metals sampling train as per the QAPP. 

3.3 Total Selected Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates

Total selected metals concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission rates were 

measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This 

system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe w/glass liner, (3) a 

heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of six GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

4

and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. 

Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% nitric acid 

(HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the metals 

sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 

3.4 Hg Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hg concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 30B and using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a sorbent trap, (2) a steel probe, (3) Teflon 

tubing, (4) three GS impingers, (5) a length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case 

equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. The first impinger was left empty 

as a water knockout, and the remaining two impingers contained approximately 300 g of silica 

gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Hg sampling train is provided as Figure 5. 

3.5 Hexavalent Chromium Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Hexavalent chromium concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures of 

Method 0061 with analysis by NCASI CI/WM-98.01. Hexavalent chromium concentrations and 

emission rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack 

sampling system. This system consisted of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a 

glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length 

of sample line, and (7) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and a 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the 

next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger 

contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 

sampling train is provided as Figure 6. 

3.6 HF and HCl Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of hydrogen halide concentrations and emission rates were conducted using the 

procedures of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 26A. The Method 26A sampling train consisted 

of: (1) a heated borosilicate or quartz probe liner; (2) a heated borosilicate or quartz glass filter 

holder containing a pre-weighed 110-mm diameter washed quartz filter with Teflon filter 

support; (3) a set of three Greensburg-Smith (GS) impingers each containing 100 ml of 0.1 

Normal Sulfuric Acid (0.1 N H2SO4), (4) a modified GS impinger containing a known weight of 

silica gel desiccant; (5) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech control case equipped with a 

pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Figure 7 provides an illustration of the Method 26A 

sample train. 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

5

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2 below. 

Table2 

41 Furnace Emissions Test Program Results Summary

Test Date(s) Pollutant Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hr) 

Emission Rate 

(lbs/ton glass) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm)

Filterable PM2.5 0.13 0.071 4.7 

Organic Condensible PM2.5 0.0071 0.0038 0.25 

Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 0.071 0.038 2.6 

September 28 & 29, 

2010 

Total PM2.5 0.21 0.11 7.5 

Filterable Particulate 1.19 0.64 44.5 

Antimony < 1.3E-5 < 7.0E-6 < 4.9E-4 

Arsenic 4.6E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3 

Beryllium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4 

Cadmium < 3.3E-6 < 1.7E-6 < 1.2E-4 

Chromium 4.5E-5 2.4E-5 1.7E-3 

Cobalt 1.1E-5 5.6E-6 4.0E-4 

Lead 3.4E-5 1.8E-5 1.3E-3 

Manganese 1.2E-4 6.2E-5 4.3E-3 

Nickel < 1.6E-5 < 8.7E-6 < 6.1E-4 

September 29 & 30, 

2010 

Selenium < 3.3E-5 < 1.7E-5 < 1.2E-3 

September 28, 2010 Mercury 2.9E-6 1.6E-6 9.9E-2 

September 29 & 30, 

2010 

Hexavalent Chromium < 2.1E-6 < 1.1E-6 < 7.7E-5 

September 28 & 29, Hydrogen Chloride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1 

2010 Hydrogen Fluoride < 4.2E-3 < 2.2E-3 < 1.5E-1 

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Appendix A. Process data 

associated with the emissions test program is provided in Appendix B. Field and computergenerated data sheets are included in Appendix C. Appendix D includes calibration documents 

and Appendix E includes laboratory analytical reports. 
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12 

NAIMA/U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report December 1, 2010 

6

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by NAIMA and/or 

Owens Corning Insulating, LLC. BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without 

NAIMA’s consent except as required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the 

competent performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in 

accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for 

consequential damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

Brandon V. Chase 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
Figures 
diameter = 36"

Points Distance "

12 0.8

11 2.4

10 4.2

9 6.4

8 9.0

7 12.8

6 23.2

5 27.0

4 29.6

3 31.8

2 33.6

1 35.2

Figure 1

Site: Sampling Date:

Owens Corning September 28-30, 2010

Mount Vernon, Ohio

#1 Melter

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Not to Scale

144"

 120"
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site: Sampling Date:

USEPA Method 3A September 28-30, 2010

Owens Corning

Mount Vernon, Ohio

#1 Melter

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale, Michigan

Data Acquisition System

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip)

Environics Gas 

Dilution System

M&C Model 100-L

O2 Analyzer

CAI Series 600

CO2 Analyzer

pump

tedlar 

bag
Figure 3

Site: Sampling USEPA OTM27/28 September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 Melter

BT Environmental Consult

2615 Wolcott Michigan

Silica gel

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

45mm Filter Housing

Verticle Condenser Filter Holder W/ Tef

Pot Belly Impinger 100 mL DI H2O
Figure 4

Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 29 September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 Melter

BT Environmental Consult

2615 Wolcott Michigan 48220

Silica gel

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5
Figure 5

Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 30B Sampling Train September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 Melter

BT Environmental Cons2615 Wolcott Ferndale, Michigan 482

Knock out

Temperature sensor

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Sample Line

MercuryT rap

Probe
Figure 6

Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 0061 September 28-30, 2010Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 Melter

BT Environmental Cons2615 WolcottFerndale, Michigan

Meter Rig

Temp.

ProbeFilter

On

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel

Perastaltic pump

Teflon tee

75 mL 0.1 N KOH
Empt

Figure 7

Site: Sampling Date:USEPA Method 26A Sampling Train September 28-30, 2010

Owens CorningMount Vernon, Ohio#1 Melter

BT Environmental C2615 Wolcott Ferndale, Michigan

Heated Filter Box

S-type pitot w/ thermocouple

Heated probe with glass liner

Meter Rig

Temp

ProbeFilter

O

Off

-

+

00:00

1 2 3 4 5

Empty 15 mL 0.1N H2SO4 
APPENDIX A 

DETAILED TEST RUN RESULTS 
Plant Job #

Location OTM27/OTM 28 Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 9/29/2010

Start Run Start Time 7:33:00 12:05:00 7:56:00

Run Finish Time 11:39:00 16:25:00 12:06:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 232.83 245.94 241.9 240

DN Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.225 0.250 0.250 0.242

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.58 29.88 29.68

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.46

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 90.640 93.725 90.375 91.580

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 86.08 87.79 78.81 84.23

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 87.005 89.683 88.807 88.498

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 50 51 39 46.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.35 2.40 1.84 2.20

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.4

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.974 0.974 0.980 0.976

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.6 20.5 20.6

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79 79 79 79.0

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.89 28.89 28.90 28.89

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.60 28.60 28.68 28.63

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.58 29.88 29.68

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 153 155 157 155

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.148 0.114 0.110 0.124

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 23.3 20.5 20.1 21.3

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 7,204 8,175 7,138 7,505

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 8,710 9,863 8,525 9,033

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 117.2 105.1 106.8 109.7

Wp Production, tons glass per hour

W Filterable PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 14.8 11.6 8.6 11.7

Cmg/dscm Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 6.0E+00 4.6E+00 3.4E+00 4.7E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.8E-01 1.2E-01 9.1E-02 1.3E-01

Elb/ton product Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Organic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.6

Cmg/dscm Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 2.4E-01 3.1E-01 2.0E-01 2.5E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Organic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 7.5E-03 8.5E-03 5.3E-03 7.1E-03

Elb/ton product Organic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 4.8 6.7 7.8 6.4

Cmg/dscm Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 1.9E+00 2.6E+00 3.1E+00 2.6E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 6.0E-02 7.1E-02 8.3E-02 7.1E-02

Elb/ton product Inorganic Condensible PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Total PM2.5 Catch Weight, mg 20.2 19.1 16.9 18.7

Cmg/dscm Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm 8.2E+00 7.5E+00 6.7E+00 7.5E+00

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Total PM2.5 Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-01 2.0E-01 1.8E-01 2.1E-01

Elb/ton product Total PM2.5 Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Owens Corning 10-3990.12

Mt Vernon

Address 100 Blackjack Rd

Personnel Matthew Young
Plant Job #

Location Method 29 Metals Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 2 Average

Date Test Date 9/29/2010 9/30/2010 9/30/2010

Start Run Start Time 13:04:00 7:02:00 10:50:00

Run Finish Time 16:28:00 10:25:00 12:18:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.370 0.370 0.370 0.370

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 1.75 1.92 2.11 1.92

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 143.985 149.900 158.640 150.842

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 98.58 83.52 93.44 91.85

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 136.914 146.060 151.879 144.951

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 57 80 81 72.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 2.68 3.77 3.81 3.42

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 1.9 2.5 2.4 2.3

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.981 0.975 0.976 0.977

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.5 1 0.9 0.8

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.7 20.2 20.5

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 78.9 78.3 78.9 78.7

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.99 28.95 28.95

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.69 28.71 28.68 28.70

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 168 161 164 165

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.102 0.114 0.124 0.114

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 19.5 20.6 21.6 20.6

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 7,202 6,818 7,518 7,180

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 8,732 8,283 9,158 8,724

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.2 100.1 99.7 99.6

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Particulate Method 5 Catch Weight, mg 218.0 142.0 185.1 181.7

Cmg/dscm Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm 56.2 34.3 43.0 44.5

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Particulate Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.44 0.93 1.21 1.19

Elb/ton product Particulate Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Antimony Catch Weight, μg 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Cmg/dscm Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm 5.2E-04 4.8E-04 4.6E-04 4.9E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Antimony Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.3E-05 1.3E-05 1.3E-05 1.3E-05

Elb/ton product Antimony Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Arsenic Catch Weight, μg 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0

Cmg/dscm Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm 1.8E-03 1.7E-03 1.6E-03 1.7E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Arsenic Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.6E-05 4.6E-05 4.6E-05 4.6E-05

Elb/ton product Arsenic Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Beryllium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Cmg/dscm Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Beryllium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

Elb/ton product Beryllium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cadmium Catch Weight, μg 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Cmg/dscm Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04 1.2E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cadmium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06 3.3E-06

Elb/ton product Cadmium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Chromium Catch Weight, μg 8.1 6.3 6.4 6.9

Cmg/dscm Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 2.1E-03 1.5E-03 1.5E-03 1.7E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 5.3E-05 4.1E-05 4.2E-05 4.5E-05

Elb/ton product Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Cobalt Catch Weight, μg 1.9 2.2 0.8 1.6

Cmg/dscm Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm 4.8E-04 5.2E-04 1.9E-04 4.0E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Cobalt Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.2E-05 1.4E-05 5.3E-06 1.1E-05

Elb/ton product Cobalt Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Lead Catch Weight, μg 5.7 8.6 1.5 5.3

Cmg/dscm Lead Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-03 2.1E-03 3.5E-04 1.3E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Lead Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Lead Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.8E-05 5.6E-05 9.8E-06 3.4E-05

Elb/ton product Lead Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Manganese Catch Weight, μg 17.4 18.5 17.1 17.6

Cmg/dscm Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm 4.5E-03 4.5E-03 4.0E-03 4.3E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Manganese Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.1E-04 1.2E-04 1.1E-04 1.2E-04

Elb/ton product Manganese Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Nickel Catch Weight, μg 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Cmg/dscm Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm 6.4E-04 6.0E-04 5.8E-04 6.1E-04

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Nickel Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/hr 1.6E-05 1.6E-05 1.6E-05 1.6E-05

Elb/ton product Nickel Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W Selenium Catch Weight, μg 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Cmg/dscm Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm 1.3E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03 1.2E-03

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Selenium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 3.3E-05 3.3E-05

Elb/ton product Selenium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

Owens Corning 10-3990.12

Mt Vernon

Address

Personnel PM
M30B Mercury Testing

Company Name Plant Location City Plant Location State Source Name Source IDOwens Corning Mount Vernon Ohio 41 Furnace 41 Furnace Please note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "S"

Measured Value 

(mg/dscm)

Corrected 

Concentration 

(mg/dscm at 7% O2)

Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used (EPA Method 30B) Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Me

Comm

1 9/28/2010 7:35 9/28/2010 9:35 9.99E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 2 9/28/2010 9:54 9/28/2010 11:54 1.00E-04 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 3 9/28/2010 12:12 9/28/2010 14:12 9.81E-05 N/A Wet EPA Method 30B ADL 

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time

Page 1 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

QA/QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1 Mass (ng) Section 2 Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Initial Spike (ng) Total Non- Spike (ng) Sample Volume (dscm) Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit C

2.6 0.4 20.5 9,863 8,175 153 R1, A 14.6 0.18 14.78 0 14.78 0.15 1% 12.6 0.4 20.5 9,863 8,175 153 R2, A 15 0.07 15.07 0 15.07 0.15 9% 02.6 0.4 20.5 8,710 7,204 155 R3, A 14.7 0.1 14.8 0 14.8 0.15 9% 1

Trap #1

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for 

Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 

1 for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

Flue Gas 

Temperature (F) Other Supporting Information

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)

Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas Flow 

Rate (dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(acfm)

Page 2 of 3 
M30B Mercury Testing

Trap ID Section 1 Mass Section 2 Mass Total Mass Initial Spike Total Non- Spike Sample Volume Volume Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration (μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit Crec R (%) by Run Ravg (%) 

R1, B 33.5 0.26 33.76 20 13.76 0.15 1% 1

0.092

0.008 4 0.1249 94

R2, B 25.0 0.33 25.33 10 15.33 0.16 9% 1

0.093

0.007 4 0.0538 88

R3, B 24.4 0.17 24.57 10 14.57 0.15 9% 1

0.095

0.003 2 0.0617 95

Trap #2 Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

≤20% of field 

recovery test

≤ 10% of Section 

1 Hg mass for Hg 

conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or ≤ 

20% of Section 1 

for Hg conc.≤1 

μg/dscm

≥10 % RD mass 

for Hg conc. >1 

μg/dscm: or 

≤20% RD or ≤0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. 

for Hg conc. ≤1

μg/dscm

92

Page 3 of 3 
Plant Job #

Location Hex Chrome Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/29/2010 9/30/2010 9/30/2010

Start Run Start Time 13:04:00 7:02:00 10:50:00

Run Finish Time 16:27:00 10:25:00 14:10:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192 192

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.374 0.374 0.374 0.374

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 2.24 1.91 2.12 2.09

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 164.155 150.550 158.310 157.672

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 104.51 90.09 95.66 96.75

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 156.182 146.385 152.465 151.677

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 156 107 219 160.7

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.34 5.04 10.31 7.56

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.5 3.3 6.3 4.7

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.955 0.967 0.937 0.953

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.5 20.6 20.5 20.5

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79 78.9 79 79.0

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.90 28.90 28.90 28.90

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.41 28.54 28.21 28.39

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.78 29.78 29.81

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 166 160 162 163

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.128 0.110 0.121 0.120

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 21.8 20.2 21.3 21.1

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 7,036 7,449 7,162 7,216

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 8,582 9,267 9,049 8,966

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.3 100.4 102.9 101.5

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W Hexavalent Chromium Catch Weight, μg 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3

Cmg/dscm Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm 9.0E-05 7.2E-05 6.9E-05 7.7E-05

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 Hexavalent Chromium Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/hr 2.5E-06 1.9E-06 1.9E-06 2.1E-06

Elb/ton product Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

OC 10-3990.12

Mt. Vernon

Address

Personnel JP
Plant Job #

Location HCl and HF Testing Copyright by Walter Smith

Run Number 1 2 3 Average

Date Test Date 9/28/2010 9/29/2010 9/29/2010

Start Run Start Time 16:07:00 7:17:00 8:26:00

Run Finish Time 17:10:00 8:20:00 10:36:00

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Θ Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 60

DN Nozzle Dianeter, inches 0.370 0.370 0.370 0.370

Cp Pitot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84

Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.013 1.013 1.013 1.013

PBr Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.88 29.88 29.78

ΔH Average orifice meter Differential, inches H2O 2.12 1.83 1.89 1.95

Vm Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 49.255 45.700 46.590 47.182

tm Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 85.96 82.94 88.02 85.64

Vmstd Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 47.958 45.163 45.622 46.248

Vlc Total Moisture Liquid collected, ml 27 25 24 25.3

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 1.27 1.18 1.13 1.19

% H2O Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.974 0.975 0.976 0.975

%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, % 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.3

%O2 Oxygen, % 20.6 20.5 20.9 20.7

% CO+ N2 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.0 79.0 79.1 79.0

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.89 28.90 28.84 28.87

Ms Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.61 28.62 28.57 28.60

Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.58 29.88 29.88 29.78

ts Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 157 152 153 154

ΔPavg Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.128 0.110 0.113 0.117

vs Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 21.7 20.1 20.3 20.7

As Stack Crossectional Area, square feet 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

Qsd Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 7,154 7,593 7,238 7,328

Qaw Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 8,515 9,213 8,627 8,785

%I Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 99.7 99.7 99.5 99.6

Wp Production, tons of glass per hour

W HCl Catch Weight, μg 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0

Cmg/dscm HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.5E-01 1.5E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HCl Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HCl Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03

Elb/ton product HCl Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

W HF Catch Weight, μg 200.0 200.0 200.0 200.0

Cmg/dscm HF Concentration, mg/dscm 1.5E-01 1.6E-01 1.5E-01 1.5E-01

Cmg/dscm@7%O2 HF Concentration, mg/dscm @ 7% O2 N/A N/A N/A

Elb/hr HF Emission Rate, pounds/hr 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03 4.2E-03

Elb/ton product HF Emission Rate, pounds/ton product

OC 10-3990.12

Mt. Vernon

Address

Personnel JP
APPENDIX B 

PROCESS DATA 
APPENDIX C 

FIELD AND COMPUTER-GENERATED DATA 

SHEETS 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4 ft A Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PCompany OC DGM # MB 3 Method 26A Total Points 24Location Mt. Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 2.5

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.77 Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 2.5

Operator JP Bws (%) 3.00 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 18 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.58

Barometric 29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.58 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.37 O2 (%) 20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00075 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.89 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.56 Act. Flow (cfm) 9,220 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 47.70 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,800

Moisture % 2.60 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,566

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

12 0.0 2.5 16:07 373.63 0.09 154 81 81 1.49 1.49 2

11 2.5 5.0 16:09 375.36 0.09 153 81 81 1.49 1.49 2

10 5.0 7.5 16:12 377.10 0.08 153 81 81 1.33 1.32 2

9 7.5 10.0 16:14 378.73 0.08 153 82 81 1.33 1.32 2

8 10.0 12.5 16:17 380.34 0.09 153 83 81 1.49 1.49 2

7 12.5 15.0 16:19 382.08 0.08 153 84 82 1.33 1.33 26 15.0 17.5 16:22 383.73 0.12 154 85 82 1.99 1.99 25 17.5 20.0 16:24 385.74 0.13 154 87 82 2.19 2.19 24 20.0 22.5 16:27 387.84 0.15 155 88 82 2.49 2.49 23 22.5 25.0 16:29 390.09 0.17 157 89 82 2.82 2.82 22 25.0 27.5 16:32 392.46 0.18 160 90 83 2.99 2.99 21 27.5 30.0 16:37 394.91 0.18 160 91 83 2.99 2.99 2

12 30.0 32.5 16:40 397.38 0.17 157 86 84 2.82 2.82 2

11 32.5 35.0 16:42 399.75 0.18 159 90 84 2.99 2.99 2

10 35.0 37.5 16:45 402.21 0.17 159 91 84 2.82 2.82 2

9 37.5 40.0 16:47 404.58 0.17 159 92 84 2.82 2.82 28 40.0 42.5 16:50 406.97 0.16 160 93 85 2.66 2.66 27 42.5 45.0 16:52 409.28 0.14 160 93 85 2.32 2.32 26 45.0 47.5 16:55 411.45 0.12 161 93 85 1.99 1.99 25 47.5 50.0 16:57 413.46 0.10 160 93 85 1.66 1.66 24 50.0 52.5 17:00 415.31 0.11 161 93 86 1.83 1.83 23 52.5 55.0 17:02 417.25 0.11 159 93 86 1.83 1.83 22 55.0 57.5 17:05 419.19 0.10 157 93 86 1.66 1.66 21 57.5 60.0 17:07 421.03 0.10 156 93 86 1.66 1.66 2

60.0 17:10 422.88

Average: 49.26 0.13 157.0 88.5 83.4 2.13 2.12 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4 ft A Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PCompany OC DGM # MB 3 Method 26A Total Points 24Location Mt. Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 2.5

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.77 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 2.5

Operator JP Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 14 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 11 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.88 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.37 O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00075 CO2 (%) 0.5 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.57 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,522 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 44.96 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,346

Moisture % 2.55 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,126

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

12 0.0 2.5 7:17 423.15 0.12 151 77 77 2.00 1.98 2

11 2.5 5.0 7:19 425.12 0.12 150 77 77 2.00 1.98 2

10 5.0 7.5 7:22 427.10 0.13 151 78 78 2.17 2.15 2

9 7.5 10.0 7:24 429.16 0.12 151 79 78 2.00 1.98 2

8 10.0 12.5 7:27 431.14 0.12 151 81 78 2.00 1.98 2

7 12.5 15.0 7:29 433.13 0.11 152 82 78 1.83 1.82 26 15.0 17.5 7:32 435.03 0.10 152 84 79 1.67 1.66 25 17.5 20.0 7:34 436.84 0.10 152 85 79 1.67 1.66 24 20.0 22.5 7:37 438.66 0.10 152 86 79 1.67 1.66 23 22.5 25.0 7:39 440.49 0.10 152 86 79 1.67 1.66 22 25.0 27.5 7:42 442.30 0.10 152 87 80 1.67 1.66 21 27.5 30.0 7:47 444.12 0.10 151 87 80 1.67 1.66 2

12 30.0 32.5 7:50 445.95 0.09 149 83 81 1.50 1.49 2

11 32.5 35.0 7:52 447.68 0.09 151 86 81 1.50 1.50 2

10 35.0 37.5 7:55 449.42 0.09 152 87 81 1.50 1.50 2

9 37.5 40.0 7:57 451.16 0.08 152 88 81 1.33 1.33 28 40.0 42.5 8:00 452.81 0.08 152 89 82 1.33 1.33 27 42.5 45.0 8:02 454.44 0.07 152 89 82 1.17 1.16 26 45.0 47.5 8:05 455.96 0.11 152 89 82 1.83 1.83 25 47.5 50.0 8:07 457.87 0.13 152 90 82 2.17 2.16 24 50.0 52.5 8:10 459.94 0.14 153 91 82 2.33 2.33 23 52.5 55.0 8:12 462.11 0.15 153 91 83 2.50 2.50 22 55.0 57.5 8:15 464.35 0.15 152 92 83 2.50 2.50 21 57.5 60.0 8:17 466.60 0.15 152 92 83 2.50 2.50 2

60.0 8:20 468.85

Average: 45.70 0.11 151.6 85.7 80.2 1.84 1.83 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4 ft A Pollutant HCl Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PCompany OC DGM # MB 3 Method 26A Total Points 24Location MT.Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 2.5

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.77 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 2.5

Operator JP Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 60.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 15 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 9 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.88 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.37 O2 (%) 20.9 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00075 CO2 (%) 0.0 Md 28.84 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.51 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,637 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 45.41 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,426

Moisture % 2.43 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,203

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

12 0.0 2.5 8:26 469.03 0.09 150 85 84 1.51 1.51 2

11 2.5 5.0 8:28 470.78 0.09 152 88 84 1.51 1.51 2

10 5.0 7.5 8:31 472.53 0.08 152 88 84 1.34 1.34 2

9 7.5 10.0 8:33 474.16 0.08 152 89 84 1.34 1.34 2

8 10.0 12.5 8:36 475.79 0.08 152 89 84 1.34 1.34 2

7 12.5 15.0 8:38 477.43 0.08 152 89 84 1.34 1.34 26 15.0 17.5 8:41 479.06 0.12 153 90 84 2.01 2.01 25 17.5 20.0 8:43 481.06 0.14 153 91 84 2.35 2.35 24 20.0 22.5 8:46 483.22 0.14 154 92 84 2.35 2.35 23 22.5 25.0 8:48 485.40 0.15 153 93 84 2.52 2.51 22 25.0 27.5 8:51 487.65 0.15 154 93 85 2.52 2.51 21 27.5 30.0 8:56 489.90 0.15 153 94 85 2.52 2.52 2

12 30.0 32.5 10:06 492.16 0.12 151 85 85 2.01 2.01 2

11 32.5 35.0 10:08 494.18 0.12 153 86 86 2.01 2.01 2

10 35.0 37.5 10:11 496.19 0.14 154 88 85 2.35 2.35 2

9 37.5 40.0 10:13 498.36 0.13 154 90 86 2.18 2.18 28 40.0 42.5 10:16 500.44 0.12 154 93 86 2.01 2.01 27 42.5 45.0 10:18 502.46 0.12 154 93 86 2.01 2.01 26 45.0 47.5 10:21 504.46 0.11 154 94 86 1.85 1.84 25 47.5 50.0 10:23 506.40 0.10 155 94 86 1.68 1.68 24 50.0 52.5 10:26 508.25 0.10 155 95 86 1.68 1.68 23 52.5 55.0 10:28 510.07 0.10 155 94 86 1.68 1.68 22 55.0 57.5 10:31 511.92 0.10 155 95 87 1.68 1.68 21 57.5 60.0 10:33 513.78 0.10 154 95 87 1.68 1.68 2

60.0 10:36 515.62

Average: 46.59 0.11 153.3 91.0 85.1 1.89 1.89 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 5ft E Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PCompany Owens Corning DGM # MB 3 Method OTM27/28 Total Points 24Location Mt Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 9.7

Source Furnace 41 Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 9.7

Operator Matthew Young Bws (%) 2.63 # of Ports 2 Total Run 232.8Filter Number Condensate Volume 32 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.58

Barometric 29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.58 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.225 O2 (%) 20.60 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00028 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.89 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) 9,863 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 86.90 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 8,396

Moisture % 2.64 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 8,175

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments:

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

12 0.0 11.7 7:33 776.52 0.21 160 79 79 0.50 0.46 2

11 11.7 23.7 7:44 781.10 0.22 161 81 80 0.52 0.46 2

10 23.7 35.6 7:55 785.83 0.22 161 83 81 0.52 0.46 2

9 35.6 47.0 8:06 790.52 0.20 161 85 82 0.47 0.46 2

8 47.0 58.2 8:17 795.03 0.19 159 86 83 0.45 0.461 2

7 58.2 68.7 8:28 799.39 0.17 160 87 83 0.40 0.465 2

6 68.7 76.8 8:38 803.53 0.10 153 87 84 0.24 0.464 2

5 76.8 84.8 8:46 806.71 0.10 152 88 85 0.24 0.475 2

4 84.8 92.9 8:54 809.88 0.10 152 88 85 0.24 0.478 2

3 92.9 101.4 9:02 813.03 0.11 151 88 85 0.26 0.478 2

2 101.4 109.8 9:10 816.32 0.11 149 88 85 0.26 0.479 2

1 109.8 118.3 9:18 819.61 0.11 149 88 86 0.26 0.482 2

12 118.3 126.3 9:45 822.91 0.10 148 86 86 0.24 0.48 2

11 126.3 134.4 9:53 826.14 0.10 149 87 86 0.24 0.485 2

10 134.4 142.5 10:01 829.31 0.10 150 88 86 0.24 0.483 2

9 142.5 150.6 10:09 832.47 0.10 150 89 86 0.24 0.482 2

8 150.6 158.6 10:17 835.63 0.10 150 89 86 0.24 0.482 2

7 158.6 167.1 10:25 838.78 0.11 151 89 87 0.26 0.482 2

6 167.1 177.0 10:33 842.06 0.15 152 89 87 0.36 0.481 2

5 177.0 187.5 10:42 845.88 0.17 152 90 87 0.40 0.479 2

4 187.5 198.6 10:52 849.94 0.19 151 90 87 0.45 0.479 2

3 198.6 210.0 11:03 854.19 0.20 152 90 87 0.47 0.481 2

2 210.0 221.4 11:14 858.53 0.20 152 90 87 0.47 0.479 2

1 221.4 232.8 11:25 862.82 0.20 151 90 87 0.48 0.479 2

232.8 11:39 867.16

Average: 90.64 0.15 153.2 87.3 84.9 0.35 0.47 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 5ft E Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PCompany Owens Corning DGM # MB 3 Method OTM27-28 Total Points 24Location Mt Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 10.2

Source Furnace 41 Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 10.2

Operator Matthew Young Bws (%) 2.6 # of Ports 2 Total Run 245.9Filter Number Condensate Volume 34 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.58

Barometric 29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain 17 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.58 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.25 O2 (%) 20.60 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00034 CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.89 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,710 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 89.57 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,396

Moisture % 2.61 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,204

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

12 0.0 9.2 12:05 867.69 0.09 149 86 86 0.33 0.468 2

11 9.2 18.3 12:14 871.41 0.09 151 87 86 0.33 0.468 2

10 18.3 27.0 12:23 875.06 0.08 151 88 86 0.29 0.465 2

9 27.0 35.6 12:31 878.40 0.08 152 88 86 0.29 0.465 2

8 35.6 44.8 12:39 881.72 0.09 152 89 86 0.33 0.463 2

7 44.8 54.4 12:48 885.22 0.10 152 89 86 0.36 0.463 2

6 54.4 64.6 12:57 888.91 0.11 153 89 87 0.40 0.463 2

5 64.6 76.0 13:07 892.74 0.14 153 89 87 0.51 0.462 2

4 76.0 87.4 13:18 897.05 0.14 153 89 87 0.51 0.462 2

3 87.4 99.2 13:29 901.32 0.15 153 89 87 0.54 0.462 22 99.2 111.1 13:40 905.74 0.15 152 89 87 0.54 0.462 2

1 111.1 122.1 13:51 910.19 0.13 152 89 87 0.47 0.464 2

12 122.1 134.3 14:22 914.31 0.16 153 87 87 0.58 0.464 2

11 134.3 146.1 14:34 918.99 0.15 154 87 86 0.54 0.462 210 146.1 158.0 14:45 923.55 0.15 154 88 86 0.54 0.46 2

9 158.0 169.0 14:56 928.10 0.13 159 89 86 0.47 0.46 28 169.0 180.0 15:07 932.32 0.13 161 89 87 0.47 0.453 2

7 180.0 190.6 15:18 936.53 0.12 163 90 87 0.43 0.451 26 190.6 200.2 15:28 940.59 0.10 163 90 87 0.36 0.448 2

5 200.2 209.4 15:37 944.19 0.09 163 90 87 0.33 0.448 2

4 209.4 218.5 15:46 947.66 0.09 157 90 88 0.33 0.448 2

3 218.5 228.2 15:55 951.11 0.10 155 90 88 0.36 0.457 2

2 228.2 237.9 16:04 954.75 0.10 154 90 88 0.36 0.46 21 237.9 245.9 16:13 958.39 0.07 153 90 88 0.25 0.462 2

245.9 16:25 961.42

Average: 93.72 0.11 154.7 88.8 86.8 0.41 0.46 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 5ft E Pollutant PM2.5 Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PCompany Owens Corning DGM # 3 Method OTM27-28 Total Points 24Location Mt Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 10.1

Source Furnace 41 Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 10.1

Operator Matthew Young Bws (%) 2.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 241.9Filter Number Condensate Volume 21 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 18 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.88 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.25 O2 (%) 20.50 Ref Press 29.92

Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00034 CO2 (%) 0.5 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.68 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,525 Must delete extra z

Vmnstd 88.70 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,286

Moisture % 2.03 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,138

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells D

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe 

(

12 0.0 10.1 7:56 961.61 0.11 152 71 70 0.39 0.454 2

11 10.1 20.7 8:06 965.40 0.12 151 71 71 0.43 0.454 2

10 20.7 30.8 8:16 969.44 0.11 151 73 71 0.39 0.456 2

9 30.8 40.5 8:26 973.24 0.10 152 74 72 0.36 0.456 2

8 40.5 50.2 8:35 976.73 0.10 154 75 72 0.36 0.456 2

7 50.2 59.8 8:44 980.33 0.10 154 76 73 0.36 0.453 2

6 59.8 70.8 8:53 983.94 0.13 154 77 74 0.47 0.454 2

5 70.8 81.8 9:04 987.99 0.13 155 78 75 0.47 0.455 2

4 81.8 93.3 9:15 992.05 0.14 155 79 76 0.50 0.454 2

3 93.3 104.3 9:26 996.25 0.13 154 79 76 0.47 0.455 22 104.3 114.4 9:37 1000.38 0.11 154 80 77 0.39 0.456 2

1 114.4 123.6 9:47 1004.21 0.09 154 81 78 0.32 0.457 2

12 123.6 135.0 10:08 1007.61 0.14 153 79 78 0.50 0.458 2

11 135.0 146.4 10:19 1011.92 0.14 154 81 79 0.50 0.459 210 146.4 158.3 10:30 1016.19 0.15 155 82 79 0.54 0.459 2

9 158.3 170.1 10:41 1020.56 0.15 156 83 80 0.54 0.457 28 170.1 181.5 10:52 1024.92 0.14 159 83 80 0.50 0.457 2

7 181.5 191.2 11:03 1029.19 0.10 164 84 81 0.36 0.452 2

6 191.2 199.8 11:12 1032.75 0.08 164 84 81 0.29 0.446 2

5 199.8 208.5 11:20 1036.04 0.08 164 85 82 0.29 0.446 2

4 208.5 216.5 11:28 1039.37 0.07 164 86 83 0.25 0.447 2

3 216.5 224.6 11:36 1042.39 0.07 164 87 83 0.25 0.447 22 224.6 233.3 11:44 1045.43 0.08 165 87 84 0.29 0.447 2

1 233.3 241.9 11:52 1048.70 0.08 165 88 85 0.29 0.447 2

241.9 12:06 1051.98

Average: 90.38 0.11 157.0 80.1 77.5 0.40 0.45 2

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4ft A Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany Owens Corning DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points 24 0.001@15" 0.001@8"

Location Mt Vernon Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator PM Bws (%) 3.00 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number 10072343 Condensate Volume 29 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 28 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.88 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.37 O2 (%) 20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00075 CO2 (%) 0.5 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.58 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,300 Must delete extra zeros in t

Vmnstd 136.32 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 6,966

Moisture % 1.93 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 6,757

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 13:04 52.44 0.13 167 90 89 2.23 2.21 251 

12 4.0 8.0 13:08 55.75 0.15 167 94 90 2.58 2.55 253 

11 8.0 12.0 13:12 59.31 0.15 168 96 90 2.58 2.55 254 

11 12.0 16.0 13:16 62.93 0.15 168 98 91 2.58 2.55 254 

10 16.0 20.0 13:20 66.55 0.14 168 99 91 2.40 2.38 254 

10 20.0 24.0 13:24 70.09 0.11 168 99 91 1.89 1.87 255 

9 24.0 28.0 13:28 73.15 0.08 168 99 92 1.37 1.36 253 

9 28.0 32.0 13:32 75.83 0.07 168 99 92 1.20 1.19 255 

8 32.0 36.0 13:36 78.34 0.07 168 99 93 1.20 1.19 253 

8 36.0 40.0 13:40 80.84 0.07 168 99 93 1.20 1.19 254 

7 40.0 44.0 13:44 83.55 0.11 168 99 93 1.89 1.87 254 

7 44.0 48.0 13:48 86.51 0.11 169 100 94 1.89 1.87 253 

6 48.0 52.0 13:52 89.61 0.08 168 100 94 1.37 1.36 254 

6 52.0 56.0 13:56 92.33 0.08 167 100 94 1.37 1.37 252 

5 56.0 60.0 14:00 94.98 0.07 167 100 94 1.20 1.2 253 

5 60.0 64.0 14:04 97.52 0.07 167 100 94 1.20 1.2 255 4 64.0 68.0 14:08 100.02 0.07 167 100 94 1.20 1.2 252 

4 68.0 72.0 14:12 102.50 0.07 168 100 95 1.20 1.2 254 

3 72.0 76.0 14:16 104.97 0.08 168 100 95 1.37 1.37 253 

3 76.0 80.0 14:20 107.68 0.08 167 100 95 1.37 1.37 253 

2 80.0 84.0 14:24 110.36 0.09 167 101 95 1.55 1.54 254 

2 84.0 88.0 14:28 113.2 0.09 167 101 95 1.55 1.54 254 

1 88.0 92.0 14:32 116.06 0.08 168 101 96 1.37 1.37 254 

1 92.0 96.0 14:41 118.66 0.08 167 102 96 1.38 1.37 254 

12 96.0 100.0 14:52 121.44 0.08 167 102 96 1.37 1.37 254 

12 100.0 104.0 14:56 124.30 0.09 167 100 96 1.55 1.54 253 

11 104.0 108.0 15:00 127.06 0.09 167 100 96 1.55 1.54 253 

11 108.0 112.0 15:04 129.93 0.10 168 102 96 1.72 1.71 253 

10 112.0 116.0 15:08 132.91 0.10 168 103 97 1.72 1.71 253 

10 116.0 120.0 15:12 135.89 0.10 168 103 97 1.72 1.71 255 

9 120.0 124.0 15:16 138.85 0.10 168 103 97 1.72 1.71 253 9 124.0 128.0 15:20 141.82 0.10 169 104 97 1.72 1.71 252 8 128.0 132.0 15:24 144.78 0.10 169 104 98 1.72 1.71 253 8 132.0 136.0 15:28 147.74 0.10 169 104 98 1.72 1.71 253 7 136.0 140.0 15:32 150.76 0.10 169 104 98 1.72 1.71 253 7 140.0 144.0 15:36 153.76 0.10 169 104 98 1.72 1.71 254 6 144.0 148.0 15:40 156.77 0.10 170 104 98 1.72 1.71 255 6 148.0 152.0 15:44 159.78 0.12 169 105 99 2.06 2.06 252 5 152.0 156.0 15:48 162.88 0.12 169 105 99 2.06 2.06 253 5 156.0 160.0 15:52 166.25 0.13 169 105 99 2.23 2.23 253 4 160.0 164.0 15:56 169.68 0.13 169 105 99 2.23 2.23 253 4 164.0 168.0 16:00 173.12 0.13 170 105 99 2.23 2.23 255 3 168.0 172.0 16:04 176.51 0.13 169 106 99 2.23 2.23 253 3 172.0 176.0 16:08 179.97 0.13 170 106 99 2.23 2.23 255 2 176.0 180.0 16:12 183.38 0.13 170 106 99 2.23 2.23 252 2 180.0 184.0 16:16 186.80 0.12 169 106 100 2.06 2.06 254 1 184.0 188.0 16:20 190.02 0.12 170 106 100 2.06 2.06 254 1 188.0 192.0 16:24 193.27 0.11 169 106 100 1.89 1.89 253 

192.0 16:28 196.42

Average: 143.99 0.10 168.2 101.5 95.6 1.76 1.75 253 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4FTA Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points 24 0.0001@15" 0.00@7"Location Mt Vernon Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JB Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number Condensate Volume 46 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 34 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.78 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.37 O2 (%) 20.7 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00075 CO2 (%) 1.0 Md 28.99 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.66 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,741 Must delete extra zeros in t

Vmnstd 145.36 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,395

Moisture % 2.53 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,173

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 7:02 197.05 0.10 162 72 72 1.69 1.65 252 

12 4.0 8.0 7:06 199.93 0.10 162 73 72 1.69 1.65 255 

11 8.0 12.0 7:10 202.77 0.12 163 75 73 2.03 1.98 253 

11 12.0 16.0 7:14 205.87 0.12 163 77 73 2.03 1.98 254 

10 16.0 20.0 7:18 209.02 0.12 163 78 73 2.03 1.99 254 

10 20.0 24.0 7:22 212.16 0.12 163 79 74 2.03 1.99 254 

9 24.0 28.0 7:26 215.3 0.11 163 80 74 1.86 1.82 254 

9 28.0 32.0 7:30 218.3 0.11 164 81 75 1.86 1.82 253 

8 32.0 36.0 7:34 221.39 0.10 164 82 76 1.69 1.66 252 

8 36.0 40.0 7:38 224.31 0.10 164 83 78 1.69 1.66 253 

7 40.0 44.0 7:42 227.22 0.09 159 83 77 1.52 1.5 255 

7 44.0 48.0 7:46 229.98 0.09 157 84 77 1.52 1.5 254 

6 48.0 52.0 7:50 232.78 0.10 157 84 77 1.69 1.67 254 

6 52.0 56.0 7:54 235.79 0.10 156 85 77 1.69 1.67 254 

5 56.0 60.0 7:58 238.74 0.11 155 85 78 1.86 1.84 253 

5 60.0 64.0 8:02 241.79 0.11 156 86 79 1.86 1.84 255 

4 64.0 68.0 8:06 244.88 0.12 155 86 79 2.03 2.01 253 

4 68.0 72.0 8:10 248.16 0.13 155 87 80 2.20 2.18 254 

3 72.0 76.0 8:14 251.41 0.13 155 87 80 2.20 2.18 254 

3 76.0 80.0 8:18 254.81 0.12 155 88 80 2.03 2.02 254 

2 80.0 84.0 8:22 258.06 0.12 155 88 81 2.03 2.02 255 

2 84.0 88.0 8:26 261.31 0.12 155 88 81 2.03 2.02 253 

1 88.0 92.0 8:30 264.56 0.11 154 88 81 1.86 1.85 254 

1 92.0 96.0 8:39 267.67 0.12 154 88 81 2.03 2.02 254 

12 96.0 100.0 8:49 270.92 0.13 162 82 82 2.20 2.19 254 

12 100.0 104.0 8:53 274.26 0.13 163 86 82 2.20 2.19 252 

11 104.0 108.0 8:57 277.62 0.15 163 88 82 2.53 2.53 254 

11 108.0 112.0 9:01 281.20 0.15 164 89 82 2.53 2.53 254 

10 112.0 116.0 9:05 284.81 0.15 163 90 83 2.53 2.53 254 

10 116.0 120.0 9:09 288.41 0.15 164 90 83 2.53 2.53 254 

9 120.0 124.0 9:13 292 0.15 164 91 83 2.53 2.53 254 9 124.0 128.0 9:17 295.58 0.15 165 91 84 2.53 2.53 254 8 128.0 132.0 9:21 299.18 0.14 165 91 84 2.36 2.36 254 8 132.0 136.0 9:25 302.69 0.14 164 91 84 2.36 2.36 255 7 136.0 140.0 9:29 306.19 0.14 164 92 84 2.36 2.36 253 7 140.0 144.0 9:33 309.7 0.14 164 92 85 2.36 2.36 254 

6 144.0 148.0 9:37 313.19 0.11 164 92 85 1.86 1.86 255 6 148.0 152.0 9:41 316.31 0.11 163 91 85 1.86 1.86 254 5 152.0 156.0 9:45 319.41 0.10 163 91 85 1.69 1.69 255 5 156.0 160.0 9:49 322.4 0.09 163 91 85 1.52 1.52 254 

4 160.0 164.0 9:53 325.25 0.08 163 91 85 1.35 1.35 254 4 164.0 168.0 9:57 327.91 0.08 163 91 85 1.35 1.35 255 3 168.0 172.0 10:01 330.54 0.08 164 90 85 1.35 1.35 253 3 172.0 176.0 10:05 333.16 0.08 164 90 85 1.35 1.35 254 2 176.0 180.0 10:09 335.77 0.09 163 90 85 1.52 1.52 253 2 180.0 184.0 10:13 338.53 0.09 163 91 85 1.52 1.52 254 1 184.0 188.0 10:17 341.35 0.09 163 91 86 1.52 1.52 254 1 188.0 192.0 10:21 344.18 0.09 163 91 86 1.52 1.52 253 

192.0 10:25 346.95

Average: 149.90 0.11 161.1 86.5 80.6 1.93 1.92 253.8 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 4FTA Pollutant Metals Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB3 Method 29 Total Points 24Location Mt Vernon Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.82 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JB Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number 10081633 Condensate Volume 51 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 30 DGM Y 1.003 Pm (in Hg) 29.78 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.37 O2 (%) 20.2 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00075 CO2 (%) 0.9 Md 28.95 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.62 Act. Flow (cfm) 9,167 Must delete extra zeros in t

Vmnstd 151.08 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,715

Moisture % 2.46 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,484

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 10:50 347.20 0.13 162 85 85 2.22 2.2 252 

12 4.0 8.0 10:54 350.56 0.13 165 85 84 2.22 2.19 252 

11 8.0 12.0 10:58 353.93 0.14 165 86 84 2.39 2.36 253 

11 12.0 16.0 11:02 357.42 0.14 165 88 84 2.39 2.36 253 

10 16.0 20.0 11:06 360.91 0.15 164 90 85 2.57 2.53 254 

10 20.0 24.0 11:10 364.48 0.15 165 90 85 2.57 2.53 253 

9 24.0 28.0 11:14 368.06 0.15 165 91 85 2.57 2.53 255 

9 28.0 32.0 11:18 371.6 0.15 165 92 85 2.57 2.53 253 

8 32.0 36.0 11:22 375.18 0.15 165 93 86 2.57 2.54 255 

8 36.0 40.0 11:26 378.74 0.15 165 94 86 2.57 2.53 253 

7 40.0 44.0 11:30 382.31 0.13 165 94 87 2.22 2.2 254 

7 44.0 48.0 11:34 385.72 0.13 165 95 87 2.22 2.2 255 

6 48.0 52.0 11:38 389.14 0.10 165 95 88 1.71 1.69 253 

6 52.0 56.0 11:42 392.12 0.10 164 95 88 1.71 1.69 255 

5 56.0 60.0 11:46 395.07 0.12 164 95 88 2.05 2.03 253 

5 60.0 64.0 11:50 398.32 0.12 164 95 89 2.05 2.03 253 

4 64.0 68.0 11:54 401.57 0.12 165 96 89 2.05 2.03 254 

4 68.0 72.0 11:58 404.82 0.12 165 96 89 2.05 2.03 253 

3 72.0 76.0 12:02 408.07 0.12 165 96 90 2.05 2.04 255 

3 76.0 80.0 12:06 411.32 0.12 164 97 90 2.05 2.04 253 

2 80.0 84.0 12:10 414.57 0.12 165 97 90 2.05 2.04 254 

2 84.0 88.0 12:14 417.82 0.12 165 97 90 2.05 2.04 254 

1 88.0 92.0 12:18 421.06 0.12 165 98 91 2.05 2.04 252 

1 92.0 96.0 424.31 0.12 164 98 91 2.05 2.04 254 

12 96.0 100.0 427.56 0.12 161 93 92 2.05 2.04 254 

12 100.0 104.0 0:04 430.83 0.12 161 96 92 2.05 2.04 252 

11 104.0 108.0 0:08 434.07 0.11 162 97 92 1.88 1.87 254 

11 108.0 112.0 0:12 437.18 0.11 163 97 92 1.88 1.87 253 

10 112.0 116.0 0:16 440.28 0.11 164 98 92 1.88 1.87 254 

10 116.0 120.0 0:20 443.38 0.11 164 98 92 1.88 1.87 253 

9 120.0 124.0 0:24 446.55 0.10 164 98 93 1.71 1.7 254 

9 124.0 128.0 0:28 449.48 0.10 164 98 93 1.71 1.7 255 

8 128.0 132.0 0:32 452.47 0.09 165 99 93 1.54 1.53 253 8 132.0 136.0 0:36 455.34 0.09 165 99 93 1.54 1.53 254 7 136.0 140.0 0:40 458.23 0.12 165 99 93 2.05 2.05 252 7 140.0 144.0 0:44 461.48 0.12 164 99 94 2.05 2.05 255 

6 144.0 148.0 0:48 464.68 0.14 165 99 94 2.39 2.39 254 

6 148.0 152.0 0:52 468.27 0.14 165 100 94 2.39 2.39 253 

5 152.0 156.0 0:56 471.71 0.14 165 100 94 2.39 2.39 254 

5 156.0 160.0 1:00 475.21 0.14 165 101 94 2.39 2.39 253 

4 160.0 164.0 1:04 478.79 0.13 165 101 95 2.22 2.22 254 

4 164.0 168.0 1:08 482.24 0.13 165 101 95 2.22 2.22 254 

3 168.0 172.0 1:12 485.69 0.13 165 102 95 2.22 2.22 253 

3 172.0 176.0 1:16 489.14 0.13 165 102 95 2.22 2.22 255 

2 176.0 180.0 1:20 492.57 0.12 164 102 96 2.05 2.05 251 

2 180.0 184.0 1:24 495.89 0.12 164 102 96 2.05 2.05 256 

1 184.0 188.0 1:28 499.19 0.12 164 102 96 2.05 2.05 251 

1 188.0 192.0 1:32 502.5 0.12 165 102 96 2.05 2.05 254 

192.0 505.84

Average: 158.64 0.12 164.4 96.3 90.6 2.12 2.11 253.5 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Owens Corning DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Mount Vernon, OH Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator PM Bws (%) 1 # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number - Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 29.58

Barometric 29.58 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 1 Pm (in Hg) 29.58 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.78 Act. Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B AB A B 

7:35:00 AM 0.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 5 6.40 6.26 86 86 

5.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 86 86 

10.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 86 86 15.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 5 86 86 20.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 86 86 25.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 30.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 35.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 40.0 158.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 45.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 50.0 159.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 87 55.0 160.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 60.0 153.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 65.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 70.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 75.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 80.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 89 85.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 90.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 95.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 

100.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 105.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 88 110.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 89 115.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 88 89 

9:35:00 AM 120.0 149.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 150.110 150.46 88 89 

Average 120.0 154.8 255.0 255.0 87.36 87.52

Volume 143.710 144.200 

dscm 0.14 0.14 

Trap/ Probe Temp

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Owens Corning DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Mount Vernon, OH Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator PM Bws (%) 2.6 # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number - Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 30.13

Barometric 30.13 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 1 Pm (in Hg) 30.13 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.05 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.46 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.88 Stack Area (sf) 9.39

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.60 Act. Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B AB A B 

9:54:00 AM 0.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 0.00 0 88 88 

5.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 

10.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 15.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 20.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 25.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 6 4 87 88 30.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 35.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 40.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 45.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 50.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 55.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 60.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 65.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 70.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 75.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 80.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 85.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 90.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 95.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 

100.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 105.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 87 110.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 115.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 

11:54:00 AM 120.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 150.400 150.2 87 88 

Average 120.0 150.6 255.0 255.0 86.72 87.36

Volume 150.400 150.200 

dscm 0.15 0.15 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 

Trap/ Probe Temp
BT Environmental Consulting

30B Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # Hg Probe Pollutant Hg Points/Port 1Company Owens Corning DGM # 2033 Method 30B Total Points 1Location Mount Vernon, OH Rate (L/m) 1.25 Run # 3 Time/pt (min) N/ASource 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ N/A Date 28-Sep-10 Time/reading 5.0

Operator PM Bws (%) 2.3 # of Ports 1 Total Run 120.0

Filter Number - Condensate Volume N/A Cp N/A Ps (in Hg) 30.13

Barometric 30.13 Silica Gel Weight Gain N/A DGM Y 1 Pm (in Hg) 30.13 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.05 Actual Dn (in) N/A O2 (%) 20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.46 An (ft^2) CO2 (%) 0.4 Md 28.89 Stack Area (sf) 9.39

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.64 Act. Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 150.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) #VALUE! Dry Ref Flow (cfm) #DIV/0!

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #VALUE!

Clock Time Sample Time Stack Temp

A B A B A B AB A B 

12:12:00 PM 0.0 150.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 0.00 0.00 87 87 

5.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 

10.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 15.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 20.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 25.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 30.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 35.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 40.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 45.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 50.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 55.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 60.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 65.0 151.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 70.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 75.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 86 87 80.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 85.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 90.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 95.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 

100.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 105.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 110.0 152.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 115.0 153.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 87 88 

2:12:00 PM 120.0 153.0 255 255 1.25 1.25 5 5 151.020 151.16 88 88 

Average 120.0 151.5 255.0 255.0 86.44 87.36

Volume 151.020 151.160 

dscm 0.15 0.15 

Trap/ Probe Temp

.006 L @ 10" for 1 min. .009 L@10" for 1 min. .005 L 

Leak Check Train "A" Unspiked

Rotameter Setting (LPM) Meter Vacuum ("Hg) Meter Reading (liters) Meter Temp (*F)

Pre Test Post Test 
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 7ft A Pollutant Hexchrome Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 6 Method OO61 Total Points 24Location Mt. Vernon Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 1 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.77 Date 29-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 3.00 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number - Condensate Volume 90 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.88

Barometric 29.88 Silica Gel Weight Gain 66 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.88 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.374 O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00076 CO2 (%) 0.5 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.57 Act. Flow (cfm) 9,240 Must delete extra zeros in t

Vmnstd 155.31 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,777

Moisture % 4.51 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,544

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 13:04 517.58 0.18 166 90 90 3.18 3.09 NA 

12 4.0 8.0 13:08 521.55 0.18 166 94 90 3.18 3.1 NA 11 8.0 12.0 13:12 525.53 0.18 167 100 91 3.18 3.11 NA 

11 12.0 16.0 13:16 529.54 0.18 166 101 91 3.18 3.11 NA 

10 16.0 20.0 13:20 533.59 0.17 166 104 92 3.00 2.95 NA 

10 20.0 24.0 13:24 537.54 0.17 166 106 94 3.00 2.95 NA 

9 24.0 28.0 13:28 541.49 0.17 166 107 95 3.00 2.95 NA 

9 28.0 32.0 13:32 545.42 0.17 166 107 95 3.00 2.95 NA 

8 32.0 36.0 13:36 549.37 0.18 166 108 96 3.18 3.13 NA 

8 36.0 40.0 13:40 553.45 0.18 166 109 96 3.18 3.13 NA 

7 40.0 44.0 13:44 557.54 0.16 166 109 96 2.82 2.79 NA 

7 44.0 48.0 13:48 561.4 0.16 166 109 98 2.82 2.79 NA 

6 48.0 52.0 13:52 565.27 0.11 166 109 99 1.94 1.92 NA 

6 52.0 56.0 13:56 568.49 0.11 166 109 99 1.94 1.92 NA 

5 56.0 60.0 14:00 571.67 0.11 166 109 99 1.94 1.92 NA 

5 60.0 64.0 14:04 574.86 0.11 166 109 100 1.94 1.92 NA 

4 64.0 68.0 14:08 578.05 0.10 166 109 100 1.76 1.75 NA 

4 68.0 72.0 14:12 581.11 0.10 166 109 100 1.76 1.75 NA 

3 72.0 76.0 14:16 584.17 0.10 167 109 100 1.76 1.75 NA 

3 76.0 80.0 14:20 587.24 0.10 166 109 101 1.76 1.75 NA 

2 80.0 84.0 14:24 590.31 0.10 166 109 101 1.76 1.75 NA 

2 84.0 88.0 14:28 593.4 0.10 165 110 101 1.76 1.75 NA 

1 88.0 92.0 14:32 596.47 0.10 165 110 101 1.76 1.75 NA 

1 92.0 96.0 14:40 599.53 0.10 165 110 101 1.77 1.75 NA 

12 96.0 100.0 14:51 602.60 0.09 164 102 102 1.59 1.58 NA 

12 100.0 104.0 14:55 605.50 0.09 165 106 102 1.59 1.58 NA 

11 104.0 108.0 14:59 608.4 0.09 165 107 102 1.59 1.58 NA 11 108.0 112.0 15:03 611.29 0.09 165 109 102 1.59 1.58 NA 

10 112.0 116.0 15:07 614.20 0.08 166 109 102 1.41 1.41 NA 

10 116.0 120.0 15:11 616.96 0.08 166 109 102 1.41 1.41 NA 

9 120.0 124.0 15:15 619.71 0.08 166 110 103 1.41 1.41 NA 9 124.0 128.0 15:19 622.44 0.08 167 110 103 1.41 1.41 NA 8 128.0 132.0 15:23 625.20 0.09 167 110 103 1.59 1.58 NA 8 132.0 136.0 15:27 628.10 0.09 167 110 103 1.59 1.58 NA 7 136.0 140.0 15:31 630.99 0.09 167 111 104 1.59 1.58 NA 7 140.0 144.0 15:35 633.9 0.09 167 111 104 1.59 1.58 NA 

6 144.0 148.0 15:39 636.83 0.12 168 111 104 2.12 2.12 NA 

6 148.0 152.0 15:43 640.17 0.12 167 112 104 2.12 2.12 NA 

5 152.0 156.0 15:47 643.55 0.15 167 112 104 2.65 2.65 NA 

5 156.0 160.0 15:51 647.3 0.15 167 112 104 2.65 2.65 NA 

4 160.0 164.0 15:55 651.08 0.15 168 113 104 2.65 2.65 NA 

4 164.0 168.0 15:59 654.83 0.15 169 114 105 2.65 2.65 NA 

3 168.0 172.0 16:03 658.62 0.16 168 114 105 2.82 2.82 NA 

3 172.0 176.0 16:07 662.51 0.16 168 114 105 2.82 2.82 NA 

2 176.0 180.0 16:11 666.4 0.16 169 114 105 2.82 2.82 NA 

2 180.0 184.0 16:15 670.27 0.16 168 115 105 2.82 2.82 NA 

1 184.0 188.0 16:19 674.17 0.15 168 115 105 2.65 2.65 NA 

1 188.0 192.0 16:23 677.95 0.15 168 115 105 2.65 2.65 NA 

192.0 16:27 681.73

Average: 164.16 0.1279 166.5 108.8 100.3 2.26 2.24 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.012 Probe # 7ft A Pollutant Hexchrome Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 6 Method OO61 Total Points 24Location Mt. Vernon Rate (cfm) 0.75 Run # 2 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.77 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number - Condensate Volume 104 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 3 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.78 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.374 O2 (%) 20.6 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00076 CO2 (%) 0.5 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.58 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,577 Must delete extra zeros in t

Vmnstd 145.69 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 144.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,274

Moisture % 3.34 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,055

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 7:02 682.64 0.09 161 79 79 1.57 1.57 NA 

12 4.0 8.0 7:06 685.41 0.09 161 81 80 1.57 1.57 NA 

11 8.0 12.0 7:10 688.24 0.09 161 83 80 1.57 1.57 NA 

11 12.0 16.0 7:14 691.06 0.09 161 85 80 1.57 1.57 NA 

10 16.0 20.0 7:18 693.88 0.09 161 87 81 1.57 1.57 NA 

10 20.0 24.0 7:22 696.7 0.09 161 88 81 1.57 1.57 NA 

9 24.0 28.0 7:26 699.51 0.08 161 89 82 1.39 1.39 NA 

9 28.0 32.0 7:30 702.17 0.08 161 90 82 1.39 1.39 NA 

8 32.0 36.0 7:34 704.85 0.08 161 91 83 1.39 1.39 NA 

8 36.0 40.0 7:38 707.52 0.08 161 91 83 1.39 1.39 NA 

7 40.0 44.0 7:42 710.19 0.08 161 92 84 1.39 1.39 NA 

7 44.0 48.0 7:46 712.88 0.08 156 93 84 1.39 1.39 NA 

6 48.0 52.0 7:50 715.54 0.11 155 92 85 1.91 1.91 NA 

6 52.0 56.0 7:54 718.69 0.11 155 93 85 1.91 1.91 NA 

5 56.0 60.0 7:58 721.85 0.14 155 94 85 2.44 2.44 NA 

5 60.0 64.0 8:02 725.38 0.14 155 94 86 2.44 2.44 NA 

4 64.0 68.0 8:06 728.92 0.15 154 95 86 2.61 2.61 NA 

4 68.0 72.0 8:10 732.55 0.15 155 95 86 2.61 2.61 NA 

3 72.0 76.0 8:14 736.24 0.15 155 96 87 2.61 2.61 NA 

3 76.0 80.0 8:18 739.91 0.15 155 96 87 2.61 2.61 NA 

2 80.0 84.0 8:22 743.6 0.15 155 96 87 2.61 2.61 NA 

2 84.0 88.0 8:26 747.29 0.15 152 96 87 2.61 2.61 NA 

1 88.0 92.0 8:30 751 0.15 152 96 88 2.61 2.61 NA 

1 92.0 96.0 8:39 754.68 0.15 152 97 88 2.61 2.61 NA 

12 96.0 100.0 8:49 758.37 0.11 156 88 88 1.91 1.91 NA 

12 100.0 104.0 8:53 761.53 0.11 157 93 88 1.91 1.91 NA 

11 104.0 108.0 8:57 764.7 0.11 157 93 88 1.91 1.91 NA 11 108.0 112.0 9:01 767.86 0.11 158 95 88 1.91 1.91 NA 

10 112.0 116.0 9:05 771.02 0.11 158 96 88 1.91 1.91 NA 

10 116.0 120.0 9:09 774.17 0.11 158 96 88 1.91 1.91 NA 

9 120.0 124.0 9:13 777.3 0.10 158 96 89 1.74 1.74 NA 

9 124.0 128.0 9:17 780.33 0.10 164 95 89 1.74 1.74 NA 8 128.0 132.0 9:21 783.36 0.10 164 96 89 1.74 1.74 NA 8 132.0 136.0 9:25 786.39 0.10 163 96 89 1.74 1.74 NA 7 136.0 140.0 9:29 789.4 0.10 163 96 89 1.74 1.74 NA 

7 140.0 144.0 9:33 792.41 0.10 163 96 89 1.74 1.74 NA 

6 144.0 148.0 9:37 795.43 0.10 163 96 90 1.74 1.74 NA 

6 148.0 152.0 9:41 798.44 0.10 163 96 90 1.74 1.74 NA 

5 152.0 156.0 9:45 801.46 0.11 164 96 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

5 156.0 160.0 9:49 804.65 0.11 163 96 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

4 160.0 164.0 9:53 807.8 0.11 164 97 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

4 164.0 168.0 9:57 810.98 0.11 164 97 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

3 168.0 172.0 10:01 814.14 0.11 164 97 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

3 172.0 176.0 10:05 817.3 0.11 165 97 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

2 176.0 180.0 10:09 820.48 0.11 164 98 91 1.91 1.91 NA 

2 180.0 184.0 10:13 823.63 0.11 163 98 91 1.91 1.91 NA 

1 184.0 188.0 10:17 826.83 0.11 165 97 90 1.91 1.91 NA 

1 188.0 192.0 10:21 830.01 0.11 164 98 91 1.91 1.91 NA 

192.0 10:25 833.19

Average: 150.55 0.11 159.6 93.5 86.7 1.91 1.91 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check
BT Environmental Consulting

Isokinetic Run Sheet

Project No.: 10-3990.12 Probe # 7ft A Pollutant Hexchrome Points/Port 12 Start Finish Pre PostCompany OC DGM # MB 6 Method OO61 Total Points 24 0@15" 0.005@6"

Location Mt. Vernon Rate (cfm) Run # 3 Time/pt (min) 8.0

Source 41 Furnace Delta ∆H@ 1.77 Date 30-Sep-10 Time/reading 4.0Operator JP Bws (%) 3.0 # of Ports 2 Total Run 192.0

Filter Number - Condensate Volume 150 Cp 0.840 Ps (in Hg) 29.78

Barometric 29.78 Silica Gel Weight Gain 69 DGM Y 1.013 Pm (in Hg) 29.78 Ref Temp 68

Static (in H2O) -0.03 Actual Dn (in) 0.374 O2 (%) 20.5 Ref Press 29.92Stack Dia (ft) 3.00 An (ft^2) 0.00076 CO2 (%) 0.5 Md 28.90 Stack Area (sf) 7.07

Est.DH(in H2O) Ms 28.57 Act. Flow (cfm) 8,991 Must delete extra zeros in t

Vmnstd 151.66 Preliminary dP (in H20) Total Vol.(cf) 0.0 Wet Ref Flow (cfm) 7,598

Moisture % 6.36 Preliminary Ts (oF) Est. Us (ft/s) 0.0 Dry Ref Flow (cfm) 7,370

Preliminary Tm (oF) Theor Dn (in) #DIV/0! Comments: "Data Entry Cells" 

"Calculated Cells Do Not T

PT # Start Time End Time

Clock Time 

(24hr) DGM Vol. Delta P Stack Temp Meter In Meter Out

Desired Delta 

H

Actual 

Delta H

Probe Temp

(*F)

12 0.0 4.0 10:50 833.32 0.12 161 90 90 2.10 2.09 NA 

12 4.0 8.0 10:54 836.56 0.12 162 92 90 2.10 2.09 NA 

11 8.0 12.0 10:58 839.75 0.12 161 92 90 2.10 2.09 NA 

11 12.0 16.0 11:02 843 0.12 162 94 90 2.10 2.09 NA 

10 16.0 20.0 11:06 846.32 0.12 162 94 90 2.10 2.09 NA 

10 20.0 24.0 11:10 849.63 0.12 162 96 90 2.10 2.09 NA 

9 24.0 28.0 11:14 852.95 0.11 161 97 90 1.93 1.92 NA 

9 28.0 32.0 11:18 856.13 0.11 162 97 90 1.93 1.92 NA 

8 32.0 36.0 11:22 859.29 0.11 161 98 91 1.93 1.92 NA 

8 36.0 40.0 11:26 862.46 0.11 162 98 91 1.93 1.92 NA 

7 40.0 44.0 11:30 865.63 0.11 161 99 91 1.93 1.92 NA 

7 44.0 48.0 11:34 868.79 0.11 161 99 91 1.93 1.92 NA 

6 48.0 52.0 11:38 871.97 0.11 161 100 92 1.93 1.92 NA 

6 52.0 56.0 11:42 875.16 0.11 161 100 92 1.93 1.92 NA 

5 56.0 60.0 11:46 878.37 0.10 161 100 92 1.75 1.75 NA 

5 60.0 64.0 11:50 881.40 0.10 161 100 93 1.75 1.75 NA 

4 64.0 68.0 11:54 884.45 0.10 161 100 93 1.75 1.75 NA 

4 68.0 72.0 11:58 887.47 0.10 159 100 93 1.75 1.75 NA 

3 72.0 76.0 12:02 890.54 0.10 160 101 94 1.75 1.75 NA 

3 76.0 80.0 12:06 893.58 0.10 160 101 94 1.75 1.75 NA 

2 80.0 84.0 12:10 896.62 0.10 159 101 94 1.75 1.75 NA 

2 84.0 88.0 12:14 899.66 0.10 159 101 95 1.75 1.75 NA 

1 88.0 92.0 12:18 902.67 0.10 159 101 95 1.75 1.75 NA 

1 92.0 96.0 12:26 905.72 0.10 159 101 95 1.75 1.75 NA 

12 96.0 100.0 12:34 908.78 0.12 159 96 95 2.10 2.1 NA 

12 100.0 104.0 12:38 912.14 0.12 160 96 94 2.10 2.1 NA 11 104.0 108.0 12:42 915.35 0.10 160 97 94 1.75 1.75 NA 

11 108.0 112.0 12:46 918.38 0.10 161 98 94 1.75 1.75 NA 

10 112.0 116.0 12:50 921.42 0.10 162 98 93 1.75 1.75 NA 

10 116.0 120.0 12:54 924.44 0.10 163 98 93 1.75 1.75 NA 

9 120.0 124.0 12:58 927.46 0.10 162 98 93 1.75 1.75 NA 9 124.0 128.0 13:02 930.5 0.10 162 98 93 1.75 1.75 NA 

8 128.0 132.0 13:06 933.52 0.09 163 98 93 1.58 1.57 NA 8 132.0 136.0 13:10 936.41 0.09 163 99 93 1.58 1.57 NA 7 136.0 140.0 13:14 939.3 0.09 161 99 93 1.58 1.58 NA 

7 140.0 144.0 13:18 942.19 0.09 163 99 93 1.58 1.57 NA 6 144.0 148.0 13:22 945.06 0.09 164 98 93 1.58 1.57 NA 6 148.0 152.0 13:26 948.01 0.16 164 99 93 2.80 2.8 NA 

5 152.0 156.0 13:30 951.7 0.16 165 99 93 2.80 2.8 NA 

5 156.0 160.0 13:34 955.51 0.16 165 100 93 2.80 2.8 NA 

4 160.0 164.0 13:38 959.34 0.16 165 101 93 2.80 2.8 NA 

4 164.0 168.0 13:42 963.13 0.16 165 101 93 2.80 2.8 NA 

3 168.0 172.0 13:46 966.95 0.16 165 101 91 2.80 2.8 NA 

3 172.0 176.0 13:50 970.74 0.16 165 102 94 2.80 2.8 NA 

2 176.0 180.0 13:54 974.57 0.20 164 102 94 3.50 3.5 NA 

2 180.0 184.0 13:58 978.84 0.20 163 102 94 3.50 3.5 NA 

1 184.0 188.0 14:02 983.1 0.20 164 102 95 3.50 3.5 NA 

1 188.0 192.0 14:06 987.33 0.20 163 102 95 3.50 3.5 NA 

192.0 14:10 991.63

Average: 158.31 0.121 161.9 98.6 92.7 2.12 2.12 #DIV/0! 

Leak Check



































APPENDIX D 

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DOCUMENTS 
41 Furnace Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results Summary

Owens Corning - Mt. Vernon, Ohio Plant 

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

Sampling Dates: September 28 - 30, 2010

Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 

Test Run Date 9/28/2010 9/28/2010 9/29/2010 9/29/2010 9/30/20Test Time 12:10 16:34 15:31 15:54 13:09 Oxygen concentration (%) 20.6 20.6 20.5 20.5 20.6 Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 20.6 20.6 20.5 20.6 20.7 Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.0 Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.0 CO2 Correction

1 2 3 4 

Co 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.06 Cma 10.10 10.10 10.10 10.10 Cm 10.30 10.3 10.24 10.30 O2 Correction

1 2 3 4 

Co -0.03 -0.04 0.01 0.02 Cma 9.97 9.97 9.97 9.97 Cm 10.0 10.0 9.97 9.96 

Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases











APPENDIX E 

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS 
Corrected Corrected Corrected

Volume 

(mL)

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Organic 

(mg)

Inorganic 

(mg)

Acetone 

(mg) Filter (mg)

Ace + Filte

(mg)

41 Furnace R1 47.00 5.70 9.10 1.60 5.80 5.70 9.10 14.80 

41 Furnace R2 45.00 7.50 4.10 1.80 7.70 7.50 4.10 11.60 41 Furnace R3 44.00 5.40 3.20 1.50 8.80 5.40 3.20 8.60 

Blank 57.00 ND 0.30 1.10 1.60 0.30 

OTM 27/28 PM2.5 Lab Results

Owens Corning

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010

Mt. Vernon, Ohio
Corrected Corrected Correct

Volume 

(mL)

Acetone 

(mg)

Filter 

(mg)

Acetone 

(mg) Filter (mg)

Ace + Fi

(mg)

41 Furnace R1 94.00 94.00 124.00 94.00 124.00 218.00

41 Furnace R2 73.00 124.00 18.00 124.00 18.00 142.0041 Furnace R3 84.00 94.00 91.10 94.00 91.10 185.10

Blank 130.00 ND 0.70 0.70

Owens Corning

Mt. Vernon, Ohio

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010

Method 5 PM Lab Results
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Result

(μg)

Blank 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Filter 

Correction

Run 1

Blank-Corrected 

Result

(μg)

Antimony ND 0.40 ND ND ND 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Arsenic 0.79 0.40 7.80 8.30 7.80 2.00 7.80 8.30 7.80 0.79 7.01 Berylium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.50 Cadmium ND 0.10 ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.50 Chromium 2.14 0.30 10.20 8.40 8.50 1.50 10.20 8.40 8.50 2.14 8.06 Cobalt ND 0.10 1.86 2.16 0.81 0.50 1.86 2.16 0.81 0.00 1.86 Lead 3.50 0.20 9.20 12.10 5.00 1.00 9.20 12.10 5.00 3.50 5.70 Manganese 1.14 0.75 18.50 19.60 18.20 3.80 18.50 19.60 18.20 1.14 17.36 Nickle 0.87 0.50 2.70 ND 2.70 2.50 2.70 2.50 2.70 0.87 2.50 Selenium ND 1.00 ND ND ND 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 Some blank corrected values are below MDL. MDL used for calculations.

Uncorrected value (accounting for ND)

41 Furnace

Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010

Method 29 Non-Hg HAP Metals Lab Results

Owens Corning

Mt. Vernon, Ohio

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12
Corrected Corrected Co

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1 Run 2 

41 Furnace 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.10 

MDL 0.40 0.30 

Blank H2O ND

Blank KOH 0.70

Blank corrected values are below MDL. MDL used for calculations.

Method 0061 Lab Results

Mt. Vernon, Ohio

BTEC Project No. 10-3990.12

Sampling Date: September 28-30, 2010

Owens Corning
Your Project #: 10-3990.12 

Site: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON 

Your C.O.C. #: N/A

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/21

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D9275

Received: 2010/10/06, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 10

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 5 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. (1 ) 5 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A 

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/15 

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 5 N/A 2010/10/11 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H J 4 1 9 7 H J 4 1 9 8 H J 4 1 9 9 H J 4 1 9 9

Sampling Date 2010/09/28 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/29

COC Number N/A N/A N/A N/A

 U n i t s BLANK-H2O-M26A BLANK-H2SO4-M26A RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M26A-H2SO4 1-M26A-H2SO4

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 260 350 350 1 2299231

Hydrochloric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2299237

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND ND ND 200 2299237

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 0 0 H J 4 2 0 1 H J 4 2 0 2 H J 4 2 0 3

Sampling Date 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

COC Number N/A N/A

 U n i t s RUN RUN QC Batch BLANK-H2O-M0061 BLANK-KOH-M0061 RDL QC Batch

2-M26A-H2SO4 3-M26A-H2SO4

Volume ml 360 340 2299231 440 300 1 2287483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug ND 0.7 0.2 2290376

Hydrochloric Acid ug 200 ND 2299237 200

Hydrofluoric Acid ug ND ND 2299237 200

ND = Not detected

N/A = Not Applicable

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 0 4 H J 4 2 0 4 H J 4 2 0 5 H J 4 2 0 6

Sampling Date 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

COC Number

 U n i t s RUN RUN RDL RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Volume ml 770 1 690 680 1 2287483

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.3 2290376

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4197 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4198 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID BLANK-H2SO4-M26A Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4199 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4199 D u p Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4200 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 2-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Maxxam ID HJ4201 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 3-M26A-H2SO4 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2299237 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 A_S

Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2299231 N/A 2010/10/15 A_S

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4202 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID BLANK-H2O-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4203 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID BLANK-KOH-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4204 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4204 D u p Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Maxxam ID HJ4205 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4206 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2290376 2010/10/11 2010/10/11 LLE

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2287483 N/A 2010/10/11 FMO

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9275 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT VERNON

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9275

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2290376 LLE Matrix Spike

(HJ4204) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 104 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 102 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 ND, RDL=0.2 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2010/10/11 NC % 20

2299237 A_S Matrix Spike

(HJ4199) Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 110 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 111 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 98 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 100 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=200 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2010/10/15 NC % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2010/10/15 NC % 20

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 6


Your Project #: 10-3990.12 

Site: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON 

Your C.O.C. #: 0698

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/18

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D9447

Received: 2010/10/06, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 8

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) (1 ) 4 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00120 EPA OTM 28 

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) (2 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) (2 ) 4 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA OTM - 027 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/13 

Weight of DCM Received 4 N/A 2010/10/14 

Weight of Water from Impingers 4 N/A 2010/10/14 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This is a non-accredited test.

(2) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H J 4 9 2 7 H J 4 9 2 8 H J 4 9 2 9 H J 4 9 3 0 H J 4 9 3 3

Sampling Date 2010/09/27 2010/09/28 2010/09/28 2010/09/29 2010/09/27

COC Number 0698 0698 0698 0698

 U n i t s TRAIN RUN RUN RUN TRAIN RDL QC Batch

BLANK-OTM28 1-OTM28 2-OTM28 3-OTM28 BLANK-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 0.5 2291793

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.30 0.30 2291787

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 57 1 2291795

Weight g 260 220 270 250 0.1 2296252

DCM Weight g 120 210 250 200 0.1 2296251

Inorganic Condensible PM mg 1.1 1.6 1.8 1.5 0.50 2298280

Organic Condensible PM mg 1.6 5.8 7.7 8.8 1.0 2296249

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID H J 4 9 3 4 H J 4 9 3 5 H J 4 9 3 6

Sampling Date 2010/09/28 2010/09/28 2010/09/29

COC Number

 U n i t s RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-OTM27 2-OTM27 3-OTM27

< 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 5.7 7.5 5.4 0.5 2291793

< 2.5 Particulate Weight on Filter mg 9.10 4.10 3.20 0.30 2291787

Acetone Rinse Volume (2.5) ml 47 45 44 1 2291795

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4927 Collected 2010/09/27

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4928 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4929 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4930 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 3-OTM28 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Organic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2296249 2010/10/14 2010/10/14 MGE

Inorganic Condensable PM (OTM28) 2298280 2010/10/15 2010/10/15 FMO

Weight of DCM Received 2296251 N/A 2010/10/14 

Weight of Water from Impingers 2296252 N/A 2010/10/14 FMO

Maxxam ID HJ4933 Collected 2010/09/27

Sample ID TRAIN BLANK-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Page 3 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4934 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 1-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4935 Collected 2010/09/28

Sample ID RUN 2-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4936 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 3-OTM27 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

2.5 um Particulates on Filter (OTM-027) BAL 2291787 N/A 2010/10/15 BLM

<2.5um Particulates in Rinse(OTM-027) BAL 2291793 2010/10/07 2010/10/15 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291795 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Page 4 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9447 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/18 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

GENERAL COMMENTS

DI water rinse received in plastic bottles.

Sample HJ4928-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HJ4929-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Sample HJ4930-01: ORGANIC EXTRACTION : Yellowish oily material with black particles found in vial.

INORGANIC EXTRACTION : Whitish residue found in aluminum dish.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 6
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp 

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9447

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2291793 BLM Method Blank < 2.5 Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2296249 MGE Spiked Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 95 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank DUP Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 94 % 70 - 130

RPD Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 1.1 % 20

Method Blank Organic Condensible PM 2010/10/14 ND, RDL=1.0 mg

2298280 MGE Method Blank Inorganic Condensible PM 2010/10/15 ND, RDL=0.50 mg

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 6


Your Project #: 10-3990.12 

Site: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON 

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2010/10/21

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B0D9291

Received: 2010/10/06, 12:00

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals in Combined Train (6020) (1 ) 4 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) (1 ) 4 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) (1 ) 4 N/A 2010/10/14 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2010/10/13 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

(1) This test was performed in Maxxam Mississauga under Maxxam Burlington SCC Accreditation

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

LINA BARRETO, Project Manager

Email: LBarreto@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5700

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 8 1 H J 4 2 8 2 H J 4 2 8 3 H J 4 2 8 4

Sampling Date 2010/09/30 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 94.0 109 127 0.5 2291764

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.70 124 118 91.1 0.30 2291763

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 130 94 73 84 1 2291767

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID H J 4 2 8 1 H J 4 2 8 2 H J 4 2 8 2 H J 4 2 8 3 H J 4 2 8 4

Sampling Date 2010/09/30 2010/09/29 2010/09/29 2010/09/30 2010/09/30

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Total Antimony (Sb) ug ND 0.40 ND ND ND ND 2.0 2300132

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.79 0.40 7.8 7.9 8.3 7.8 2.0 2300132

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.50 2300132

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug ND 0.10 ND ND ND ND 0.50 2300132

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 2.14 0.30 10.2 8.5 8.4 8.5 1.5 2300132

Total Cobalt (Co) ug ND 0.10 1.86 1.62 2.16 0.81 0.50 2300132

Total Lead (Pb) ug 3.50 0.20 9.2 9.3 12.1 5.0 1.0 2300132

Total Manganese (Mn) ug 1.14 0.75 18.5 19.1 19.6 18.2 3.8 2300132

Total Nickel (Ni) ug 0.87 0.50 2.7 3.2 ND 2.7 2.5 2300132

Total Selenium (Se) ug ND 1.0 ND ND ND ND 5.0 2300132

ND = Not detected

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Test Summary

Maxxam ID HJ4281 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4282 Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4282 D u p Collected 2010/09/29

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2300132 2010/10/20 2010/10/19 N_R

Maxxam ID HJ4283 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Maxxam ID HJ4284 Collected 2010/09/30

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2010/10/06

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals in Combined Train (6020) ICP1/MS 2300132 2010/10/14 2010/10/19 N_R

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2291764 2010/10/07 2010/10/14 NUA

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2291763 N/A 2010/10/14 BLM

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2291767 N/A 2010/10/13 NUA

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B0D9291 Client Project #: 10-3990.12

Report Date: 2010/10/21 Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Metals in Combined Train (6020): Extra 5x dilution was required for all samples except HJ4281, due to the matrix.

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample HJ4282.

Sample HJ4282 was reanalysed for Mn 2010/10/20, due to high RSD

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9291

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2291764 NUA Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2010/10/14 ND, RDL=0.5 mg

2300132 N_R Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 105 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 4.9 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 95 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 92 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 3.2 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 99 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 102 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 3.0 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 102 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 100 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Matrix Spike

(HJ4282) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 101 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(HJ4282) Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 102 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 103 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 1.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 101 % 85 - 115

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9291

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2300132 N_R Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 1.2 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 94 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 97 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 4.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 0.7 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 1.5 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 1.3 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 98 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 99 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 0.6 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 1.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 3.1 % 20

Spiked Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 100 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 102 % 85 - 115

RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 1.5 % 20

Method Blank Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug

RPD Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug

RPD Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug

RPD Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.75 ug

RPD Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=0.50 ug

RPD Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Method Blank Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Method Blank DUP Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 ND, RDL=1.0 ug

Page 7 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 10-3990.12

P.O. #:

Project name: OWENS CORNING-MT. VERNON

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)

Maxxam Job Number: GB0D9291

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2300132 N_R RPD Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Total Antimony (Sb) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Arsenic (As) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Beryllium (Be) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Cadmium (Cd) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Chromium (Cr) 2010/10/19 17.9 % 20

Total Cobalt (Co) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Lead (Pb) 2010/10/19 0.8 % 20

Total Manganese (Mn) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Nickel (Ni) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Total Selenium (Se) 2010/10/19 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 8 of 8


Ohio Lumex Co., Inc.

9263 Ravenna Rd., Unit A-3

Twinsburg, OH 44087

Phone: (330) 405-0837

Fax: (330) 405-0847

www.ohiolumex.com

Other

Client Name BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Report Number BTEnvironmental101110 Report

Date

Contact Name Phone (248)-548-8072 (972)-931-7127

Trap I.D. Test Location Date Analyzed Scientist

 Mass ng 

Sect.1

 Mass ng 

Sect.2

Spike 

Level 

% Spike 

Recovery

Date(s) in 

Stack Comments

70657 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 14.7 0.10 9/28/2010 Run 3, Trap A

70603 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 24.4 0.17 10 9/28/2010 Run 3, Trap B

70628 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 15.0 0.07 9/28/2010 Run 2, Trap A

70638 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 25.0 0.33 10 9/28/2010 Run 2, Trap B

70562 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 14.6 0.18 9/28/2010 Run 1, Trap A

67135 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 33.5 0.26 20 9/28/2010 Run 1, Trap B

70664 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 0.17 0.14 9/28/2010 Field Blank, Trap A

67128 10/8/2010 Andrew Mertz 19.0 0.27 20 9/28/2010 Field Blank, Trap B

Variability +- 10%

Barry Boulianne bboulianne@sbcglobal.net Matthew 

Smith msmith@btecinc.com

Calibration Report Available

Turn - Around Time

Standard

48 hour rush

Less than .031 ng is considered "< LDL." Which is less 

than the lowest detection limit.

Plant/Source Owens Corning Mt Vernon 

Sorbent Trap Analysis Report

10/11/2010