alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Simulation analysis of the ground-water system in Mesozoic rocks in the Four Corners area, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico      

      January 1, 1989    

View Document

The steady-state groundwater system in Mesozoic rocks in the Four Corners area, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico, was simulated with a finite-difference digital-computer model to improve the understanding of the system. The simulated area is 4 ,100 sq mi, and it includes three aquifers. The Entrada-Navajo aquifer includes the Wingate, Navajo, and Entrada Sandstones. The Morrison aquifer includes the sandstone units of the Morrison Formation. The Dakota aquifer includes the Burro Canyon Formation and Dakota Sandstone. The simulation of the groundwater system had a mean error (error is absolute value of residual) of 70 ft for the Entrada-Navajo aquifer, 67 ft for the Morrison aquifer and 79 ft for the Dakota aquifer. The hydraulic conductivity used in the simulation ranged from 0.38 to 0.47 ft/day. Simulated inflow to the groundwater system was 30,000 acre-ft/yr. 48% of the inflow is from infiltration of precipitation within the simulated area, and 42% is from infiltration in 145 sq mi of mountain areas adjacent to the simulated area. Simulations indicated that some vertical inflow of water is needed between the Entrada-Navajo and Morrison aquifers to develop a reasonable representation of the system.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Four Corners area
                  - Arizona
                  -  Colorado
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Utah

View All **
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5059 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the definition of ‘‘surviving 

spouse’’ for purposes of the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2016 

Ms. BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the definition of ‘‘surviving spouse’’ for purposes of the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Love Lives On Act 

5 of 2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5059 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF ‘‘SURVIVING 

2 SPOUSE’’ FOR PURPOSES OF LAWS ADMINIS3 TERED BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(3) of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘and who has not 

7 remarried’’ and all that follows through ‘‘such other per8 son’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such title is fur10 ther amended as follows: 

11 (1) In section 103— 

12 (A) by striking subsection (d); and 

13 (B) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub14 section (d). 

15 (2) In section 1922(b)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘and 

16 while unremarried’’. 

17 (3) In section 2306(b)(4), by striking ‘‘sub18 section:’’ and all that follows and inserting the fol19 lowing: ‘‘subsection, the term ‘veteran’ includes an 

20 individual who dies in the military, naval, or air 

21 service.’’. 

22 (4) In section 2402(a)(5), by striking ‘‘(which 

23 for purposes of this chapter includes a surviving 

24 spouse who had a subsequent remarriage)’’. 

25 (5) In section 5110(l), by inserting after ‘‘re26 marriage by death or divorce’’ the following: ‘‘occurVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:06 May 03, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5059.IH H5059

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5059 IH

1 ring before the date of the enactment of the Love 

2 Lives on Act of 2016’’. 

3 (6) In section 5120— 

4 (A) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘or in 

5 the case of a surviving spouse, if the postal em6 ployee believes that the surviving spouse has re7 married (unless the mail is addressed to the 

8 surviving spouse in the name the surviving 

9 spouse has acquired by the remarriage)’’; and 

10 (B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘or re11 marriage’’ both places it appears. 

12 (7) In section 5121(3), by striking ‘‘or remar13 ried surviving spouse’’. 

14 (8) In section 7297(f)(2), by striking ‘‘termi15 nated’’ and all that follows through the period and 

16 inserting ‘‘upon the surviving spouse’s death.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

19 of this Act and shall apply with respect to benefits payable 

20 for months beginning on or after such date. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 231 (Friday, December 1, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 69622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-20022]



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


 Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; 
Overview Information; State Personnel Development Grants Program

Correction

    In notice document E6-20022 beginning on page 68571 in the issue of 
Monday, November 27, 2006, make the following correction:
    On the same page, in the second column, under DATES, under the 
heading ``Deadline for Transmittal of Applications,'' ``May 29, 2007'' 
should read ``March 27, 2007.''

[FR Doc. Z6-20022 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE EX REL. Larry Richard BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-JH-0676

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST CARROLL**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The district attorney is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const. art. XII § 3 ; R.S. 44:31 ; R.S. 44:31.1 ; *State ex rel. Leonard v. State* , 96-1889 (La. 6/13/97), 695 So.2d 1325 ; *see also* *State ex rel. Level v. State* , 99-2266 (La. 12/17/99), 751 So.2d 869 ; *cf.* *Range v. Moreau* , 96-1607 (La. 9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the writ is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                    40,259
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             22,780
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          71,566
<PP&E>                                    113,231
<DEPRECIATION>                            (49,178)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            241,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     75,161
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  28,708
<OTHER-SE>                                138,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              241,967
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          42,899
<CGS>                                     10,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             143,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (468)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (110,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              (110,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.004)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40549

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HERBERT EDWARD JAMES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:92-CR-163-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Herbert Edward James, federal prisoner # 04134-078, was convicted in

1993 of various offenses involving cocaine base as well as of possession of a

firearm by a felon. He received concurrent terms of life and 40 years in prison,

within the guidelines range of life as calculated by the probation officer. 

Following 2007 amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, the district court

reduced James’s sentence to concurrent terms of 360 months on all counts, at the

bottom of the amended range of 360 months to life. James filed a timely notice

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40549 Document: 00511576118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2011
No. 10-40549

of appeal. The district court denied James leave to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) on appeal on the basis that James did not meet the financial eligibility

requirements. James now seeks leave from this court to proceed IFP.

A movant seeking IFP status must demonstrate both that he is financially

eligible and that his appeal is taken in good faith, i.e., that he will raise a

nonfrivolous issue. Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 568, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). We need

not reach whether James can show financial eligibility, because he has failed to

demonstrate that his appeal will raise a nonfrivolous issue.

James argues that the district court should have considered his

postsentencing rehabilitation and departed from the guidelines range on that

basis, citing the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Pepper v. United States, 131

S. Ct. 1229 (2011), in which the Court held that on resentencing following

remand, a district court had discretion to consider postsentencing rehabilitative

conduct. This argument is without merit. A § 3582(c)(2) proceeding is not a

resentencing. Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691-92 (2010). 

Sentencing courts have no authority under § 3582(c)(2) to reduce a sentence

below the amended guidelines range, unless the district court originally imposed

a sentence below the guidelines range, which is not the case here. See id. Thus,

the district court could not have reduced James’s sentence below the amended

minimum of 360 months. See United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 238 (5th

Cir. 2009).

Because the appeal lacks any arguable legal merit, James’s IFP motion is

DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-40549 Document: 00511576118 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2011
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ASO-15]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Birmingham, AL

Correction

    In rule document 97-33620 beginning on page 67267, in the issue of 
Wednesday, December 24, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 67267, in the third column, under the heading ASO FL E5 
Birmingham, AL [Revised], in the second line, `` long. 86 deg.45'24''W) 
should read `` long. 86 deg.45'13''W)
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Opinion issued April 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00924-CV

———————————

GENETTA ISREAL, Appellant

V.

LARRY SCOTT, SHAPREE STONEHAM, VENUS SCOTT, PAMELA 

METOYER, JACQUELINE MILLER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2010-45199

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Genetta Isreal, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file 

brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did 

not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal 
2

of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/21

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re:

ROY CESAR TERAN, Case No: 20-23284 AJC

Debtor. Ch 7

/

DEBOTR’S EX-PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR NOTICE OF DEBTOR’S 

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONVERSION FROM CASE

UNDER CHAPTER 7 TO CASE UNDER CHAPTER 13

COMES NOW, Debtor, ROY CESAR TERAN, by and through undersigned counsel, and moves this court for 

an Order shortening the notice period to allow Debtor’s Emergency Motion for Conversion from Case under Chapter 

7 to Case under Chapter 13 to be heard before the December 24, 2020 and in support thereof states as follows:

1. Debtor filed this case Pro Se on December 4, 2020 as a voluntary Chapter 7 case.

2. Debtor, through Undersigned counsel, filed the Emergency Motion for Conversion from Chapter 7 Case to 

Chapter 13 case [DE 16] on December 10, 2020.

3. The 341 Meeting of Creditors is currently scheduled for January 5, 2021.

4. Debtor’s intent was to file a reorganization plan under a Chapter 13 Case to save his home through the MMM 

program.

5. Undersigned counsel will be unavailable from December 25, 2020 through January 5, 2021. 

6. Undersigned requeststhe Emergency Motion for Conversion be heard on a shortened notice before December 

24, 2020.

7. The shortening of the time period will not prejudice the rights of any interested party. 

WHEREFORE, Debtor moves this Honorable Court for an Order shortening the notice period required for a 

hearing on Debtor’s Emergency Motion for Conversion from Case under Chapter 7 to Case under Chapter 13 before 

December 24, 2020 and any other relief deemed just and reasonable.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in 

Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Law Offices of Samir Masri

901 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 101

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Tel (305) 445-3422

By: s/ Samir Masri

 Samir Masri, Esquire

 FBN: 145513

Case 20-23284-AJC Doc 18 Filed 12/11/20 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB TO WHICH
THIS IS AN EXHIBIT, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         381,277                 381,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,264                  31,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               435,387                 435,387
<PP&E>                                         170,691                 170,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,284                  21,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,956                 586,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          800,564                 800,564
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,076                   6,076
<OTHER-SE>                                   (219,684)               (219,684)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,956                 586,956
<SALES>                                          1,614                   2,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,614                   2,320
<CGS>                                            1,422                   2,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  701,801               1,372,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (131)                 (7,984)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (701,478)             (1,363,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (701,478)             (1,363,938)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)                  (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)                  (0.23)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 31

           CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kenneth C. Lowe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Transition Auto Finance
IV (TAF IV).

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TAF IV as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. TAF IV's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for TAF IV and we have:

      a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to TAF IV, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of TAF IV's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
      internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
      supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
      financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
      external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
      principles; and

      d. Disclosed in this report any change in TAF IV's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during TAF IV's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, TAF IV's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. TAF IV's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and TAF IV's Board of Directors:

      a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect TAF IV's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for TAF IV's
      auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in TAF IV's internal controls.

Date:    August 24, 2005

 /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
--------------------------
Kenneth C. Lowe,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Where is the water? Suburban [poster]              

      March 26, 2024    

View Report

View Report

Description

Water is an integral part of how we interact with the environment and live our everyday lives. This educational poster illustrates where water is in the suburbs, how it moves, and different ways water is used both naturally and through human interaction. This poster is intended for eighth-grade audiences and younger.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Hayley Corson-Dosch

##### Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

hcorson-dosch@usgs.gov

#### Cee Nell, PhD

##### Data Visualization Specialist

Water Resources Mission Area

cnell@usgs.gov

608-828-9901

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Hayley Corson-DoschHydrologistWater Resources Mission AreaEmailhcorson-dosch@usgs.govCee Nell, PhDData Visualization SpecialistWater Resources Mission AreaEmailcnell@usgs.govPhone608-828-9901
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 WRITTEN
STATEMENT
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with Annual Report of New Dragon Asia Corp. and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 25, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Peter Mak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  April
      6, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Ling WangName:
                Ling
      WangTitle:
                Chief
      Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of DigitalNet
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Ken S. BajajKen S. Bajaj
March 24, 2004 |  | 

---

QuickLinks