alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Seraphin EXANTUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3937 4D16-3967 4D16-4099

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 13, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Melanie L. Casper, Special Assistant Public Defender, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Kuntz, J.

In this appeal of three consolidated cases, the Defendant appeals his judgment and sentence revoking probation. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The State charged the Defendant in three separate cases: in the first, the Defendant was charged with aggravated battery of a law enforcement officer, aggravated assault with a firearm, and aggravated fleeing and eluding; in the second, the Defendant was charged with aggravated battery on a pregnant female; and in the third, he was charged with carrying a concealed firearm. He pleaded no contest in each, and the court sentenced him to three years' imprisonment followed by two years' probation. The court sentenced him as a youthful offender.

After serving his prison sentence and while on probation, he was arrested for multiple violations of probation (VOP). Following a VOP hearing, the court made findings as to each violation and found him guilty of each. The court then sentenced him to: twenty-five years' imprisonment and 81.15 months, with credit for 804 days, on the first case; fifteen years' imprisonment, with credit for 680 days, in the second case; and 81.15 months' imprisonment, with credit for 680 days, on the third case. Notably, the court declined to resentence the Defendant as a youthful offender, noting that he "got very lucky" with the assignment of a different judge in the prior case and that he "would not be so lucky this time."

On appeal, the Defendant argues the court erred when it failed to sentence him as a youthful offender, and the State concedes error. Even if a youthful offender commits a substantive violation of probation, a "court must maintain the defendant's youthful offender status upon resentencing for a violation of probation." *Yegge v. State* , 88 So.3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). Thus, the court erred when it failed to resentence the Defendant as a youthful offender.

Next, the Defendant argues the court erred by failing to file formal written revocation of probation orders consistent with the court's oral ruling. The State again agrees with the Defendant, stating "[t]he trial court found that [the Defendant] committed multiple violations of probation and entered a disposition order finding [the Defendant] violated probation, but it failed to enter a written order of violation of probation," and a written order should be entered. On remand, the court should enter a written order of violation of probation.

Finally, the Defendant argues the State failed to prove a violation of probation by *1202the greater weight of the evidence. On this issue, we affirm without further comment.

*Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.*

Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VOICESTREAM
WIRELESS CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         176,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  216,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,466
<INVENTORY>                                    126,211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558,716
<PP&E>                                       1,844,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                 343,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,691,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,063,814
<COMMON>                                     4,078,164
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,266,228)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,691,409
<SALES>                                         33,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,998
<CGS>                                           58,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                74,872
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (203,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (203,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (875)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (204,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.66)


</TABLE>
33-15-06-05. Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 

1. Excess emissions reports. Not later than thirty days following the 

end of a calendar quarter, any owner or operator required to monitor 

emissions in accordance with section 33-15-06-04 shall submit a report 

of excess emissions to the department. The report must include the 

following information: 

4 
History: Effective June 1, 1992; amended effective April 1, 2014. 

General Authority: NDCC 23-25-03 

Law Implemented: NDCC 23-25-03 

5
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00444-CV

IN THE MATTER OF B.C. §

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law 

No. 1

of Wichita County (CCL1-JV2020-

0027)

May 5, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial court is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001097504
<NAME>                        Power Kiosks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jul-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    44,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,397
<PP&E>                                         558,544
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 746,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,551,916
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       613
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,804,975)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   746,941
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          222,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  222,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,329,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             48,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,599,766)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,599,766)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.65



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2002 of MNS Eagle Equity Group IV, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.


                                         /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive
                                         Officer and Chief Financial Officer

                                         Date: November 8, 2002
Carl Alvin WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

26250

Vol. 63, No. 91

Tuesday, May 12, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service

7 CFR Parts 271, 278 and 279

RIN 0584-AC46

Food Stamp Program: Retailer

Integrity, Fraud Reduction and

Penalties

Correction

In proposed rule document 98–12038,

beginning on page 24985, in the issue of

Wednesday, May 6, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 24995, in the second column,

in the signature date line, ‘‘1990’’

should read ‘‘1998’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 980429110-8110-01; I.D.

042398B]

RIN 0648-AK25

Fisheries Off West Coast States and in

the Western Pacific; West Coast

Salmon Fisheries; 1998 Management

Measures

Correction

In rule document 98–11957 beginning

on page 24973, in the issue of

Wednesday, May 6, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 24981, in table 2., the

heading ‘‘D. QUOTAS’’ should be

moved and centered above the 10th line

from the bottom.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 600

[I.D. 120996A]

Magnuson Act Provisions; Essential

Fish Habitat; Extension of Comment

Period

Correction

Rule document 98–4363 was

inadvertently published in the Proposed

Rules section of the issue of Friday,

February 20, 1998, beginning on page

8607. It should have appeared in the

Rules and Regulations section.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-942-5700-00]

Filing of Plats of Survey; California

Correction

In notice document 98–7127

appearing on page 13426 in the issue of

Thursday, March 19, 1998, make the

following corrections:

On page 13426, in the third column,

under San Bernardino Meridian,

California, in the fifth line, the plat of

survey beginning Tps. 1 N and 1 S.

should begin a new line. And in the

17th line ‘‘Meets’’ should read‘‘Metes’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Clevon Lamar GHENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-576

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 19-26193-LMI Doc 90 Filed 04/07/23 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-26193-LMI Doc 90 Filed 04/07/23 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-26193-LMI Doc 90 Filed 04/07/23 Page 3 of 3
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 2016-CP-01422-COA

ANTHONY EARL LOVERN A/K/A ANTHONY

LOVERN

APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/29/2016

TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM E. CHAPMAN III

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ANTHONY EARL LOVERN (PRO SE)

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: BILLY L. GORE

NATURE OF THE CASE: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 09/05/2017

MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:

MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE LEE, C.J., FAIR AND WILSON, JJ.

WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶1. In December 2009, Anthony Earl Lovern pled guilty to gratification of lust (Count I)

and statutory rape (Count II). In his plea petition and at his plea hearing, Lovern admitted

under oath that he had rubbed his penis against the vaginal area of a twelve-year-old child

for the purpose of gratifying his lust; this occurred in 2006 when Lovern was approximately

twenty-nine years of age. Lovern also admitted under oath that he had sexual intercourse

with an eleven-year-old child (a different child); this occurred in 2005 when Lovern was

approximately twenty-eight years of age. The circuit court accepted Lovern’s plea after

finding that it was knowing, voluntary, and supported by a sufficient factual basis. The court
sentenced Lovern to fifteen years on Count I, with five years suspended, and ten years on

Count II, with ten years suspended, said sentences to run concurrently, and five years of

supervised probation.

¶2. On August 22, 2016, Lovern filed a petition for post-conviction relief in the circuit

court. He alleged that he is actually innocent of the charges, that his plea was “entered due

to coercion and fear induced by his defense attorney,” and that there was not a sufficient

factual basis for his plea. Lovern’s petition is supported by only his own allegations and is

refuted by his plea petition and the transcript of his plea hearing. The circuit court concluded

that Lovern’s petition was time-barred because it was filed almost seven years after he pled

guilty and did not fall within any of the exceptions to the statute of limitations of the Uniform

Post-Conviction Collateral Relief Act. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2) (Rev. 2015) (a

motion for post-conviction relief must be filed within three years after the entry of a

judgment of conviction based on a guilty plea).

¶3. The circuit court correctly ruled that Lovern’s claims are time-barred and without

merit. Therefore, we affirm.

¶4. AFFIRMED.

LEE,C.J.,IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES,ISHEE,CARLTON,FAIR,

GREENLEE AND WESTBROOKS, JJ., CONCUR. 

2
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4903 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service 

to target citizens of the United States for exercising 

any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to 

the Constitution of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4903 EH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TARGETING BY THE INTER2 NAL REVENUE SERVICE BASED ON THE EXER3 CISE OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. 

4 None of the funds made available under any Act may 

5 be used by the Internal Revenue Service to target citizens 

6 of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed 

7 under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the 

8 United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4903 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal RevUnited States. the First Amendment to the Constitution of the States for exercising any right guaranteed under enue Service to target citizens of the United
Daniel Thomas PAPALEO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3998

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Matthew Eric REID, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

8255

Vol. 63, No. 32

Wednesday, February 18, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service

Notice of Request for Extension of

Currently Approved Information

Collection

Correction

In notice document 98–3089

appearing on page 6511, in the issue of

Monday, February 9, 1998, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 6511, in the first column,

the heading should read as set forth

above.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, in the 3rd line from the bottom,

‘‘confessional’’ should read

‘‘concessional’’.

3. On the same page, in the second

column, in the Request for Comments:

paragraph, in the 12th line, ‘‘equality’’

should read ‘‘quality’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ACE-21]

Amendment to Class D and Class E

Airspace Areas; Manhattan, KS

Correction

In rule document 98–1229 beginning

on page 2884, in the issue of Tuesday,

January 20, 1998, make the following

correction:

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

On page 2885, in the second column,

in the tenth line, ‘‘(Lat. 30°08′27′′N,’’

should read ‘‘(Lat. 39°08′27′′N,’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4958 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update a report on the 

energy and environmental benefits of the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2016 

Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana (for herself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update 

a report on the energy and environmental benefits of 

the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY SAVINGS FROM LUBRICATING OIL. 

4 Not later than one year after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with 

6 the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agen7 cy and the Director of Management and Budget, shall— 

8 (1) review and update the report prepared pur9 suant to section 1838 of the Energy Policy Act of 

10 2005; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4958 IH

1 (2) after consultation with relevant Federal, 

2 State, and local agencies and affected industry and 

3 stakeholder groups, update data that was used in 

4 preparing that report; and 

5 (3) prepare and submit to Congress a coordi6 nated Federal strategy to increase the beneficial 

7 reuse of used lubricating oil, that— 

8 (A) is consistent with national policy as es9 tablished pursuant to section 2 of the Used Oil 

10 Recycling Act of 1980 (Public Law 96–463); 

11 and 

12 (B) addresses measures needed to— 

13 (i) increase the responsible collection 

14 of used oil; 

15 (ii) disseminate public information 

16 concerning sustainable reuse options for 

17 used oil; and 

18 (iii) promote sustainable reuse of used 

19 oil by Federal agencies, recipients of Fed20 eral grant funds, entities contracting with 

21 the Federal Government, and the general 

22 public. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 53747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-51006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-25]


Proposed Amendment to Class E Airspace; Muscatine, IA

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-23776, beginning on page 46936, in the 
issue of Thursday, September 3, 1998, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 46937, in the second column, in the ninth line from the 
bottom, ``feet or more above the surface of the surface'' should read 
``feet above the surface''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Sanitized

Report on 

Environmental 

Availability of 

Similar Solar 

Panel
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - (-)products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Data Release        February 5, 2024        Geochemistry and High-Resolution Backscattered Electron Imaging of Meteor Crater Impact Melts

Data Release        February 17, 2023        Meteor Crater, Northern Arizona: Drill Hole Sample Collection, 1970-1973, and Curation, 2010-2013

Data Release        February 8, 2023        A Lithostratigraphic Analysis of the Meteor Crater Ejecta Blanket: Measurements, Assigned Facies, and Unit Thickness

Science Snippet        June 3, 2016        EarthView–Eye of the Sahara
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 21, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-2667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 86

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0036; FRL-8278-4]
RIN 2060-AK70


Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources

Correction

    In rule document E7-2667 beginning on page 8428 in the issue of 
Monday, February 26, 2007, make the following correction:


Sec.  86.1811-09  [Corrected]

    On page 8564, in Sec.  86.11-09(t)(2), in the second column, in 
Table S09-5, in the column heading for the first column, ``Model Year 
of Introduction 2010'' should read ``Model Year of Introduction''.

[FR Doc. Z7-2667 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D