alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars      

      January 1, 2014    

H2O, CO2, SO2, O2, H2, H2S, HCl, chlorinated hydrocarbons, NO, and other trace gases were evolved during pyrolysis of two mudstone samples acquired by the Curiosity rover at Yellowknife Bay within Gale crater, Mars. H2O/OH-bearing phases included 2:1 phyllosilicate(s), bassanite, akaganeite, and amorphous materials. Thermal decomposition of carbonates and combustion of organic materials are candidate sources for the CO2. Concurrent evolution of O2 and chlorinated hydrocarbons suggests the presence of oxychlorine phase(s). Sulfides are likely sources for sulfur-bearing species. Higher abundances of chlorinated hydrocarbons in the mudstone compared with Rocknest windblown materials previously analyzed by Curiosity suggest that indigenous martian or meteoritic organic carbon sources may be preserved in the mudstone; however, the carbon source for the chlorinated hydrocarbons is not definitively of martian origin.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Gale Crater;Mars;Yellowknife Bay
                  - Gale Crater
                  - Mars
                  - Yellowknife Bay

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Population density and stream-habitat relations of the Yellowcheek Darter *(Nothonotus moorei)* among the headwaters of the Little Red River in Arkansas      

      March 11, 2021    

Nothonotus moorei (Yellowcheek Darter [YCD]) is an endangered species endemic to the headwaters of the Little Red River in north-central Arkansas. Population decline, habitat loss and fragmentation, and threats from land use and seasonal drought necessitate monitoring of population density and distribution to determine ecological and habitat associations. We evaluated YCD density and associated stream-habitat variables from 9 sites in the South Fork, Archey Fork, Middle Fork, and Beech Fork of the Little Red River from March to April 2018. Yellowcheek Darters were present at all 9 sites and 19 of 23 riffles sampled. Densities were generally comparable or higher than reported in previous studies, and we collected YCD at some sites at which they were considered previously extirpated, suggesting a rather stable population and evidence of recolonization of some sites since they were last surveyed. Yellowcheek Darter density was significantly negatively related to substrate embeddedness, and the consistent relation to embeddedness in this study and other studies suggest that this species is vulnerable to sedimentation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Lucas J Driver

##### Aquatic Ecologist

Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center

ldriver@usgs.gov

501-228-3600

## Related Content

#### Lucas J Driver

##### Aquatic Ecologist

Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center

ldriver@usgs.gov

501-228-3600

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center - Nashville, TN Office

640 Grassmere Park DriveNashville, TN37211United States

GS-W-TNnsh Webmaster@usgs.gov

(615) 837-4700

(615) 837-4799 

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - little red river
                  - Arkansas

View All **
# L_2004295EN.01002801.xml

| 18.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/28

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1640/2004

of 17 September 2004

on the issue of import licences for rice originating in the least developed countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 of 31 July 2002 laying down detailed rules for the opening and administration of the tariff quotas for rice, originating in the least developed countries, for the marketing years 2002/2003 to 2008/2009 (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 opened a tariff quota for a quantity of 3 828 tonnes of husked rice equivalent for the 2004/2005 marketing year. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 opened a tariff quota for a quantity of 3 828 tonnes of husked rice equivalent for the 2004/2005 marketing year.

| (2) | The quantities in respect of which applications have been submitted exceed the quantities available. It is therefore necessary to set a reduction percentage applicable to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities in respect of which applications have been submitted exceed the quantities available. It is therefore necessary to set a reduction percentage applicable to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For applications for import licences for rice originating in the least developed countries referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001, submitted during the first five working days of September 2004 pursuant to Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1401/2002 and notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 5(1) of the said Regulation licences shall be issued for the quantities given in the applications submitted multiplied by a reduction percentage of 91,8620 %.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 905/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 45).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 203, 1.8.2003, p. 42.

2

---
Joseph ALBERTS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3097

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2006)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 9863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-2368]



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2006 / 
Correction

[[Page 9863]]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53276; File No. SR-NASD-2005-098]


Self[dash]Regulatory Organizations; National Association of 
Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and 
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Submission of SEC Rule 15c2-11 
Information on Non[dash]Nasdaq Securities

Correction

    In notice document E6-2368 beginning on page 8875 in the issue of 
Tuesday, February 21, 2006, make the following correction:
    On page 8877, in the third column, in the second and third lines 
from the top, ``March 10, 2006'' should read ``March 14, 2006''.

[FR Doc. Z6-2368 Filed 2-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4874 

To require that States receiving grants under the Harold Rogers Prescription 

Drug Monitoring Program set aside sufficient amounts to facilitate electronic information sharing among States in compliance with the Prescription Monitoring Information Exchange National Architecture, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

GIBSON, Mr. DOLD, Mr. NORCROSS, Mr. GUINTA, and Mr. MULVANEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require that States receiving grants under the Harold 

Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Program set aside 

sufficient amounts to facilitate electronic information 

sharing among States in compliance with the Prescription Monitoring Information Exchange National Architecture, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4874 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Abuse By 

3 Using Interstate Exchange Act of 2016’’ or as the ‘‘Pre4 vent ABUSE Act of 2016’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REQUIRED SET ASIDE TO ENSURE INTEROPER6 ABILITY. 

7 Beginning on October 1, 2016, the Attorney General 

8 shall require as a condition on any grant for implementa9 tion and enhancement of a prescription drug monitoring 

10 program for a fiscal year to a State under the Harold Rog11 ers Prescription Drug Monitoring Program established 

12 under the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, 

13 the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 

14 2002 (Public Law 107–77; 115 Stat. 748), that the State 

15 set aside not less than 20 percent of such grant for pur16 poses of facilitating electronic information sharing among 

17 States in compliance with the Prescription Monitoring In18 formation Exchange National Architecture. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

R CEIVED 

JAN 27 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0682 

MIAMI TECH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE, 

INC. 

FAA CASE NO. 2010S0190295 

Judge I.E. Sullivan 

Respondent 

Joint Section 13.217/Rule 26(£) Report 

1. The parties have agreed to and recommend the following discovery plan: 

a. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) by 

Friday, January 30, 2015; 

b. Initial discovery requests will be made by Friday, Janumy 30, 2015. The pmiies 

will have until February 27, 2014, to respond to initial discovery requests; 

c. Follow-up discovery requests will be made by Friday, March 13, 2015. The 

pmiies have until Monday, April 13, 2015, to respond to follow-up discovery 

requests; 

d. All dispositive motions must be filed by Thursday, April 30, 2015; responses 

thereto by Wednesday, May 20, 2015; replies by Friday June 5, 2015; 

e. The hearing should be held in Miramm I Mimui area. 

Respectively submitted this 6th day of January, 2015. 
Is! William Vines 

!vir. William Vines 

Complainant's Counsel 

General Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

Ph: 404-305-5200 

Email: William. Vines(cl!faa.gov 

Is/ Juan R. Serrano. ____ _ 

Juan R. Senano, Esq. 

Respondent's Counsel 

Griffin, Senano & Ewing, P A 

707 SE 3rd Ave. 6th Floor 

F mi Lauderdale, FL 3 3 316 

Ph: 954-462-4002 

Email: jserrano(Glgriffinserrano.corn 

service(cl!griffinserrano.corn 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby ccriify that the foregoing Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report was sent the following as 

follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration (by regular mail only ____ __:____} 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Offlce of Hearings, M-20, Room El2-320 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

01/06/2015 ____ _ 

Dated 

(by facsimile ____ _ ) 
'~-~~ 

GRIFFIN & SERRANO, P.A. 

Attorneys at Law 

Landmark Building, Sixth Floor 

707 Southeast 3rd Avenue 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 

fl'I!IAi'tD 

!Rl. 3311 

'.UQ' .:Ill'!W'li ''.1!5 

2,-tL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, u.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite W1000 

~!DSS.;i i 0004 i 1 if' i iii' ;j pi •J i iJ 1 i' j i i 'iii i i' ;j iII i I' ill IIi I' •;I ij'l' i iii i' 'i
Exhibit 31-2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, V. Lewis Shuler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of First South  Bancorp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant, and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter( the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting, and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors and to the audit committee of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

                                 s/V. Lewis Shuler
Dated: November 30, 2006         -----------------------------------------------
                                 V. Lewis Shuler
                                 Exec. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EX-4.8



 Exhibit 4.8 

AMARIN CORPORATION PLC 

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO 
 2011
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Amarin Corporation plc 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by the Board of
Directors and shareholders of Amarin Corporation plc as follows: 
 Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to increase the total
number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be increased by 20,000,000 shares, such that Section 4(a) of the Plan, as so amended, shall read in its entirety as follows: 

Section 4. Shares Available for Awards 
  

	 	  (a)	Shares Available. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the number of Shares in respect of which Awards may be made under this Plan on any day shall not exceed the sum of
(i) 51,500,000 Shares, (ii) 3,074,680 Shares (being Shares that remained available for grants under the Company’s existing 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Plan”) as
of July 12, 2011) and (iii) the number of Shares subject to grants under the 2002 Plan that are outstanding as of the Effective Date but subsequently become Lapsed Awards (as defined below) (“the Plan Limit”). Shares to be issued
under the Plan may be either authorized but unissued Shares, or Shares acquired in the open market or otherwise. If any award over Shares granted under this Plan or the 2002 Plan expires or is forfeited, surrendered, canceled or otherwise terminated
in whole or in part without Shares being issued (“Lapsed Award”), then the Shares subject to such Lapsed Award may, at the discretion of the Committee, be made available for subsequent grants under the Plan; provided,
however, that Shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an Option or settlement of an Award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding shall not be considered a Lapsed Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of Shares
available for granting Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall not exceed the ISO Limit, and Options with respect to no more than 10,000,000 Shares may be granted to any one individual Participant during any one calendar year period.


 ADOPTED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: March 13, 2017 

ADOPTED BY SHAREHOLDERS: May 15, 2017
Case 21-16735-RAM    Doc 39    Filed 10/18/21    Page 1 of 2

Case 21-16735-RAM    Doc 39    Filed 10/18/21    Page 2 of 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

40451 

Vol. 73, No. 135 

Monday, July 14, 2008 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

21 CFR Parts 1300, 1304, 1306, and 

1311 

[Docket No. DEA–218P] 

RIN 1117–AA61 

Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled 

Substances 

Correction 

In proposed rule document E8–14405 

beginning on page 36722 in the issue of 

Friday, June 27, 2008, make the 

following correction: 

On page 36766, in Table 18, in the 

third column, in the first entry, 

‘‘$167,70’’ should read ‘‘$167,270’’. 

[FR Doc. Z8–14405 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES2
33800 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 126 / Friday, June 28, 1995 / Corrections

‘‘consistent’’ should read

‘‘inconsistent’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Weather Observation Service

Standards

Correction

In notice document 96–16046

beginning on page 32887 in the issue of

Tuesday, June 25, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 32887, in the second column,

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT:, the last line should read

‘‘telephone (202) 366–4474.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80307]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Agency Forms Under Review

Correction

    In notice document 95-4136 beginning on page 9688 in the issue of 
Tuesday, February 21, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 9688:
    a. In the first column, under 1., the OMB Docket number: should 
read ``7100-0055''.
    b. In the second column, under 2., the OMB Docket number: should 
read ``7100-0224''.
    c. In the third column:
    (i) Under 3., the Agency form number: should read ``FR MSD-4, MSD-
5''; the OMB Docket number: should read ``7100-0100, 7100-0101''; and 
in the Abstract, in the last line, insert ``4'' after ``FR MSD-''.
    (ii) Under 4., the Agency form number: should read ``FR TA-1'', and 
the OMB Docket number: should read ``7100-0099''.
    2. On page 9689, in the first column, under 1., the OMB Docket 
number should read ``7100-0137''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Gabriel GARCIA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0687

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ICEWEB, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
      period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof, I, John
      R.
      Signorello ,
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











February
      14, 2007





By:
        /s/ John
        R. Signorello
 John
        R.
        Signorello
 Principal
        accounting Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Understanding collaborative governance from a communication network perspective: A case study of the Atlantic Salmon recovery framework      

      November 2, 2020    

Atlantic salmon populations in Maine remain critically low despite extensive hatchery supplementation and habitat improvement efforts. In 2000, the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment was listed as Endangered under the ESA with joint listing authority shared by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Because, regulators, and tribal, federal and state managers operate with independent authorities, recovery decisions depend upon effective communication and coordination among groups. Using a mixed-methods approach, we surveyed (n = 41) and interviewed (n = 28) members of the Atlantic Salmon Recovery Framework (ASRF), the joint governance structure responsible for Atlantic salmon management in Maine. We used survey results to examine the communication between members of ASRF through communication network analysis. While there is a relatively high network density for individual communication (56 %), connections are decentralized, a characteristic that can be incompatible with some organizational structures. Challenges reported by members fit into three general categories; i. slow and ineffective decision-making, ii. confusion surrounding leadership and accountability, and iii. low adaptive capacity. Despite these challenges, participants reported a commitment to maintaining a collaborative governance structure and a long history of inter-organizational relationships. This introspective effort has led to a reorganization effort to optimize communication pathways.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Gulf of Maine
                  - maine

View All **