alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Four Decades Contracting, Inc., Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Georgine Hartenfels, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Douglas J. Lerose, J.), entered July 1, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,841.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this commercial claims action to recover the sum of $2,841, representing the unpaid balance due for plaintiff's services in renovating defendant's bathroom. After a nonjury trial, the District Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,841.</p><p>In a commercial claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UDCA 1807-A [a]; <i>see</i> UDCA 1804-A; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). The determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). The deference accorded to a trial court's credibility determinations applies with even greater force to judgments rendered in the Commercial Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126). As the record supports the District Court's determination, we find that the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice (<i>see</i> UDCA 1804-A, 1807-A [a]).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>Marano, P.J., Iannacci and Brands, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: July 08, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.: 20-19836-AJCMarco T Barrios

Maria Barrios

 Debtor(s). Chapter 13

_________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Objection to Claim of the 

Specialized Loan Servicing/SLS and Notice of Hearing was sent to all parties on the attached service 

list on February 18, 2021.

Electronically & Mailed: Nancy K. Neidich, Trustee, POB 279806, Miramar, FL 33027

CERTIFIED MAIL: 

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

c/o Toby Wells, CEO

6200 S. Quebec Street

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

First Class Mail: 

Debtor(s), Marco T Barrios; Maria Barrios

466 E 56th Street

Hialeah, FL 33013-1344

Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Bonial & Associates, P.C.

Natalie Lea, Auth. Agent 

P.O. Box 9013

Addison, TX 75001

Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

UNITED AGENT GROUP INC., R.A.

11380 PROSPERITY FARMS RD. #221E

PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410

Specialized Loan Servicing, 

LLC 

c/o Toby Wells, CEO

PO Box 631873

Littleton, CO 80163

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

6200 S. Quebec Street

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Respectfully Submitted: 

ROBERT SANCHEZ, P.A. 

By:/s/ Robert Sanchez, Esq. FBN#0442161

Attorney for Debtor

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Tel. 305-687-8008

Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 71 Filed 02/18/21 Page 1 of 1
Patrick A. SANTERAMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1688

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 6, 2018]

Larry S. Davis and Shana J. Korda of Larry S. Davis, P.A., Hollywood, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Michael T. Davis, and Susan Dmitrovsky of Kuehne Davis Law, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The defendant was tried by a jury and found guilty of money laundering, three counts of violating campaign contribution *564laws, two counts of organized scheme to defraud, and two counts of grand theft. The State concedes that the defendant will be placed in double jeopardy if convicted of both organized scheme to defraud and grand theft based on the same conduct. *See* , *e.g.* , *Pizzo v. State* , 945 So.2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 2006). While the trial court recognized the double jeopardy issue, it failed to dismiss the grand theft counts. Instead, adjudication and sentencing were "deferred" as to those counts.

We affirm the defendant's convictions and sentences for money laundering, violating campaign contribution laws, and organized scheme to defraud. We reverse the deferrals of adjudication and remand for dismissal of the grand theft counts.

*Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.*

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
Marquis Jarvis RIDDLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0304

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of mandamus is dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Dynamics, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Charles E. Phillips, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Charles E. Phillips
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles E. Phillips
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer

                                                     November 13, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Desmond BALLARD and Niles B. Whitten, Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 1, 2018

Niles B. Whitten, Gainesville, for Appellants.

Jacqueline Costoya of Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Desmond Ballard seeks review of orders that effectuated several rulings concerning discovery disputes, sanctions, and a judicial default in the course of a civil proceeding. With respect to the circuit court's rulings on the contested discovery issues and judicial default, these are nonappealable, nonfinal orders, and so we cannot exercise our appellate jurisdiction to consider them. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 ; *Hitt v. Homes & Land Brokers, Inc.*, 993 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ("[T]he list of appealable nonfinal orders in [ rule 9.130 ] is intended to be exhaustive."). We also conclude that the discovery and default rulings are not reviewable through certiorari. *See**Capital One, N.A. v. Forbes*, 34 So.3d 209, 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ; *FirstParadee, Ltd. v. Jones*, 828 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as it pertains to those rulings. With respect to the portion of the order that imposes sanctions in the total amount of $11,728.67 to be paid within thirty days from the entry of the circuit court's order, we do have jurisdiction to review that ruling and affirm it without comment. *See**Burt v. SP Healthcare Holdings, LLC*, 163 So.3d 1274, 1276-77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; *Griffith v. Ramzey's A Plus, Inc.*, 186 So.3d 629, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) ; *J.P. Morgan Chase Bank v. Combee*, 883 So.2d 330, 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 5 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 5 Filed 08/24/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 5 Filed 08/24/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 5 Filed 08/24/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 5 Filed 08/24/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 5 Filed 08/24/20 Page 6 of 6
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 189 (Wednesday, September 30, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 52319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10930]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 189/ Wednesday, September 30, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 52319]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 59

[AD-FRL-6149-8]
RIN 2060-AF62


National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for 
Consumer Products

Correction

    In rule document 98-22660, beginning on page 48819, in the issue of 
Friday, September 11, 1998, make the following corrections:

PART 59 [CORRECTED]

    1. On page 48831, in the second column, the Table of Contents for 
Subpart C is corrected to read as set forth below.

Subpart C--National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards 
for Consumer Products

Sec.
59.201  Applicability and designation of regulated entity.
59.202  Definitions.
59.203  Standards for consumer products.
59.204  Innovative product provisions.
59.205  Labeling.
59.206  Variances.
59.207  Test methods.
59.208  Charcoal lighter material testing protocol.
59.209  Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
59.210  Addresses of EPA Regional Offices.
59.211  State authority.
59.212  Circumvention.
59.213  Incorporations by reference.
59.214  Availability of information and confidentiality.
Table 1 to Subpart C--VOC Content Limits by Product Category
Table 2 to Subpart C--HVOC1 Content Limits for Underarm Deodorants 
and Underarm AntiPerspirants
Appendix A to Subpart C--Figures


Sec.  59.202  [Corrected]

    2. On page 48833, in the first column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the seventh line, before the word ``products'' insert the 
word ``or''.
    3. On page 48833, in the second column, in the second line from the 
bottom, ``Floggers'' should read ``Foggers''.


Sec. 59.204  [Corrected]

    4. On page 48835, in the third column, in Sec.  59.204 (c)(1), in 
the second line, ``form'' should read ``from''.


Sec.  59.208  [Corrected]

    5. On page 48837, in the first column, in Sec.  59.208 (e)(1), in 
the first line, ``(E<SUP>b</SUP>)'' should read ``(E<INF>b</INF>)''.
    6. On page 48839, in the third column, Sec.  59.208, paragraph 
``(J)'' should read ``(j)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Jermaine Marquis THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-88

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Nova Biogenetics, Inc. hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge that:

         1. The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for
         the annual period ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  October 13, 2005                 /s/ Bradley Smith
                                        ------------------
                                        Bradley Smith
Lane GREYY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D16-5852 1D17-12

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### Served: OCTOBER 28, 2014

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0811 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013NM060083) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List .**Ro~e** A
..Yod,er-' / Chief**Administra~~Y~ L~** 

### SERVICE LIST -BYU.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Todd C. Emerson Director- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0811 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The significance of dinoflagellates in the Miocene Choptank Formation beneath the Midlothian gravels in the southeastern Virginia Piedmont      

      October 9, 2018    

The Fall Line (formally "Tidewater Fall Line") separates the more resistant igneous, metamorphic, and consolidated sedimentary rocks of the Piedmont from the typically unconsolidated deposits of the Coastal Plain of Virginia. Widespread but now discontinuous patches of a deeply weathered sand and gravel are found west of the Fall Line, capping the highest hilltops. Near the community of Midlothian, Virginia, the gravels are underlain by fine-grained marine silts that bear an informative assemblage of fossil dinoflagellate cysts (dinocysts). In situ dinocysts belong to middleMiocene zone DN7, which is calibrated to ~12-13 Ma. These deposits are assigned to the upper part of the Choptank Formation, which crops out ~ 25 km(15 mi) to the east at an elevation ~ 60m(200 ft) lower. The dinocyst assemblage suggests that the maximum extent of this Choptank transgression probably covered a significant expanse of the Virginia Piedmont. The Choptank marine silts constrain the age of the unconformably overlying Midlothian gravels to younger than the latter part of the middle Miocene. Previous work has indicated that these gravels also are older than the Pliocene Yorktown Formation. Rare, reworked dinocysts in these Choptank outcrops west of the Fall Line are sourced from older deposits of more than one age. The source could be older updip strata of the lower Eocene Nanjemoy Formation, now erosionally removed. Alternatively, the source could be material referable to the upper Eocene Exmore Formation that resulted from the Chesapeake Bay impact event.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

#### Robert Weems

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

rweems@usgs.gov

703-648-6930

#### Mark W Carter

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

mcarter@usgs.gov

703-648-6910

## Related Content

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

#### Robert Weems

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

rweems@usgs.gov

703-648-6930

#### Mark W Carter

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

mcarter@usgs.gov

703-648-6910

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Florence Bascom Geoscience Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

703-648-5953

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Miocene Choptank Formation

View All **
[Cite as State v. Morsie, 2015-Ohio-65.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WARREN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2014-06-083 

: D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 1/12/2015 

: 

 

JESSIE LEE MORSIE, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. 12CR28074 

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael Greer, 500 Justice Drive, 

Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for plaintiff-appellee 

Diehl & Hubbell, LLC, Martin E. Hubbell, 304 East Warren Street, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for 

defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Jessie Lee Morsie, has filed a brief with this 

court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) 
Warren CA2014-06-083

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any 

errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of 

error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," 

Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently 

to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement 

of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

RINGLAND, P.J., S. POWELL and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Release No. 34-39510; File No. SR-NASD-97-24]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to 
Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change by the National Association 
of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Supervision and Record 
Retention Rules

Correction

    In notice document 98-418 beginning on page 1131, in the issue of 
Thursday, January 8, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 1134, in the second column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as set forth below.
Jonathon G. Katz,
Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of Savanna East Africa, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 Randell R. Torno, President and Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Jackson Rivers Company (the
     "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"), I, Don A. Paradiso, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                         By:  /s/ DON PARADISO
                                              -------------------
                                              Don Paradiso
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              February 18, 2003



<PAGE>
John L. GORDON, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 22, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Decius G. JULES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1032

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kavin Lavern SWANSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.