alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 511 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 511

  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2015

 Mr. Rokita (for himself, Mr. Kline, Mrs. Noem, Mr. Cole, Mr. Mullin, 
    Mr. Calvert, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Jones, Mr. 
 Valadao, Mr. Denham, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. McClintock, and 
    Ms. Jenkins of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER.

    Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or any enterprise or 
        institution owned and operated by an Indian tribe and located 
        on its Indian lands,'' after ``subdivision thereof''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) The term `Indian tribe' means any Indian tribe, 
        band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community 
        which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and 
        services provided by the United States to Indians because of 
        their status as Indians.
            ``(16) The term `Indian' means any individual who is a 
        member of an Indian tribe.
            ``(17) The term `Indian lands' means--
                    ``(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 
                reservation;
                    ``(B) any lands title to which is either held in 
                trust by the United States for the benefit of any 
                Indian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe 
                or individual subject to restriction by the United 
                States against alienation; and
                    ``(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that are 
                within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 
                defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a 
                federally recognized Indian tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

d0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

136927(64) 

HABIB MAMOU and V & M CORPORATION, 

d/b/a ROYAL OAK WASTE PAPER AND 

METAL COMPANY NO. 2, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 136927 

 COA: 275862 

Wayne CC: 04-432424-NM 

EDWARD C. CUTLIP, JR. and KERR, 

RUSSELL & WEBER, P.L.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 23, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 24
- 40159 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Luis Rivera, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:24
- MJ
- 2 - 1

**______________________________** Before **King, Southwick,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Luis Rivera, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rivera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 3, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-40159 Document: 37-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024No. 24
- 40159

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 24-40159 Document: 37-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2024
srpt-ex101_16.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

to the

LICENSE AND COLLABORATION AGREEMENT

between

SUMMIT (OXFORD) LIMITED

and

SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

 

This Amendment No. 1 to the License and Collaboration Agreement (“Amendment No. 1”) is made on June 13, 2017 (“Amendment No. 1 Execution Date”), with retroactive effect to April 3, 2017 (“Amendment No. 1 Effective Date”), by and between Summit (Oxford) Limited, a company organized and existing under the laws of England and Wales (“Summit”) and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware (“Sarepta”).  

WHEREAS, Summit and Sarepta entered into a License and Collaboration Agreement dated October 3, 2016 (the “Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement in order to extend the dates by which the Parties must enter into the Pharmacovigilance Agreement and the Supply Agreements and related quality agreements;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Amendment No. 1, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment No. 1 shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
The clause “Within six (6) months after the Effective Date” in Section 3.4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: “Prior to December 31, 2018.”




 


	
 
	
3.
	
The clause “Within twelve (12) months after the Effective Date” in Section 6.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: “Prior to December 31, 2018.”




 


	
 
	
4.
	
Entire Agreement/Amendments.  Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  After the Amendment No. 1 Effective Date, every reference in the Agreement to the “Agreement” shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 1.




 


	
 
	
5.
	
Counterparts.  This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in two or more counterparts, including by facsimile or PDF signature pages, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 




[Signature Page Follows]


 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the Amendment No. 1 Execution Date.


		
	
SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	
SUMMIT (OXFORD) LTD

	
BY: /s/ David T. Howton

NAME: David T. Howton

TITLE: Sr. Vice President & General Counsel
	
BY: /s/ Glyn Edwards

NAME: Glyn Edwards 

TITLE: CEO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re:

CARLOS PRADA and

ANAYS MESTRE Case No: 21-14911 LMI

Debtor. Chapter 13

/

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL 

YOU ARE NOTIFIED that Debtors, CARLOS PRADA and ANAYS MESTRE, by and 

through undersigned counsel, withdraw Debtor’s Objection to Claim 10 with the Department of 

Treasury Internal Revenue Service [DE 37].

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Florida, and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice 

in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 30th day of November 2021 a true and correct copy of 

the above and foregoing was delivered via ECF to Trustee, Nancy Neidich and to all interested 

parties.

Law Offices of Samir Masri

901 Ponce De Leon Blvd., Suite 101

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Tel: (305) 445-3422

By: s/ Samir Masri

 Samir Masri, Esquire

 FBN: 145513

Case 21-14911-LMI Doc 73 Filed 11/30/21 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Toxicity of two insecticides to California, USA, anurans and its relevance to declining amphibian populations      

      January 1, 2009    

Contaminants have been associated with population declines of several amphibian species in California (USA). Pesticides from the Central Valley of California are transported by winds into the Sierra Nevada Mountains and precipitate into wet meadows where amphibians breed. The present study examined the chronic toxicity of two of the insecticides most commonly used in the Central Valley and found in the mountains, chlorpyrifos and endosulfan, to larval Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla) and foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii) and discusses the implications of this toxicity to declining amphibian populations. Larvae were exposed to the pesticides from Gosner stages 25 to 26 through metamorphosis. The estimated median lethal concentration (LC50) for chlorpyrifos was 365 ??g/L in P. regilla and 66.5 ??g/L for R. boylii. Time to metamorphosis increased with concentration of chlorpyrifos in both species, and cholinesterase activity declined with exposure concentration in metamorphs of both species at Gosner stages 42 to 46. For endosulfan, the estimated LC50 was 15.6 ??g/L for P. regilla and 0.55 ??g/L for R. boylii. All R. boylii exposed to concentrations of greater than 0.8 ??g/L died before they entered metamorphosis. Pseudacris regilla remains relatively abundant and is broadly distributed throughout California. In contrast, R. boylii is among the species experiencing severe population declines. The present study adds to the increasing evidence that pesticides are very harmful to amphibians living in areas that are miles from sources of pesticide application. ?? 2009 SETAC.

## Citation Information
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 26 , 201 4 

# Order

Clerk August 26 , 201 4

147860 ( 88 )

THE SERVICE SOURCE, INC., and THE

SERVICE SOURCE FRANCHISE

, LLC

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ees

, SC: 147860

v COA: 301013

Lenawee CC: 09

- 003258

- CK

DHL EXPRESS (USA)

, INC

. , Defendant

- Appell ant

.

__________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs

- appellees to extend the time

for filing their appeal brief and appendix is GRANTED. The brief and appendix will be

accepted as timely filed if filed on or before September 5, 2014.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, 
and the Territory of Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, June 4, 2009 and Friday, June 
5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, June 4, 2009, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, June 5, 2009, 8 
a.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Time in Atlanta, GA. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. 
For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

     Dated: April 22, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-9893 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Robin BOUEY, Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE UNIT, Orange County Classroom Teachers Association and Orange County Education Support Professional Association, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Northwest-Pacific Islands Region 

#           Connect        

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Regional Office leadership and staff provide science center oversight and support and facilitate collaborations and partnerships in advancing USGS strategic science directions.  We encourage you to contact us. 

## Contacts

#### Jill Rolland, Sc.D.

##### Regional Director, Northwest/Pacific Islands

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

jrolland@usgs.gov

#### Patty Toccalino, Ph.D.

##### Deputy Regional Director 

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

ptocca@usgs.gov

503-679-7154

#### Jennifer M Bayer

##### PNAMP Coordinator

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

jbayer@usgs.gov

503-201-4179

#### Kyle Blasch, Ph.D.

##### Associate Regional Director

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

kblasch@usgs.gov

208-901-1579

####             Terrence Conlon (Former Employee)          

##### Regional Science Coordinator

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

#### Tara Hawksley

##### Regional Program Analyst 

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

thawksley@usgs.gov

971-221-5139

#### Lief Horwitz

##### Regional Program Officer

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

lief_horwitz@usgs.gov

206-450-1471

#### Bill Labiosa, Ph.D.

##### Regional Science Coordinator

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

blabiosa@usgs.gov

206-612-9662

#### Heather C Miller

##### Regional Quality Management System Coordinator

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

hmiller@usgs.gov

971-757-4775

#### Bill Simonds

##### Regional Safety Manager

Northwest-Pacific Islands Region

wsimonds@usgs.gov

503-250-1893

#### Stacy Masters

##### Administrative Officer

Nevada Water Science Center

smasters@usgs.gov

775-887-7657

## Employee Directory
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2014

No. 04-13-00558-CV

BRUINGTON ENGINEERING, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

PEDERNAL ENERGY, LLC,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7,767

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On September 19, 2014, Appellee Pedernal Energy, LLC filed a motion for rehearing and 

a motion for en banc reconsideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.7. The court requests 

Appellant Bruington Engineering file a response to the motion. See id. R. 49.2. If Appellant 

Bruington Engineering chooses to file a response, any such response must be filed not later than 

November 7, 2014.

It is so ORDERED on October 8, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
STATE EX REL. Karl CLOMBURG v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0939

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. BERNARD**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in *254La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 19286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 274

[Release Nos. 33-7512; 34-39748; IC-23064; File No. S7-10-97]
RIN 3235-AE46


Registration Form Used by Open-End Management Investment 
Companies

Correction

    In rule document 98-7070, beginning on page 13916, in the issue of 
Monday, March 23, 1998, make the following corrections:

PART 274 [CORRECTED]

    1. On page 13956, in Form N-1A, in the second column of the table 
in Item 13, paragraph (b), ``fund'' should read ``Fund''.
    2. On page 13957, in Form N-1A, in the second, third and fifth 
columns of the Compensation Table in Item 13, paragraph (b)(1), 
``fund'' should read ``Fund'' each place it appears.
    3. On page 13963, in Form N-1A, in the third column of the table in 
Item 27, paragraph (b), ``fund'' should read ``Fund''.

Appendix A [Corrected]

    4. On page 13964, in appendix A, in the second column, in the third 
line, ``Revised General Instructions A, B, C, and F'' should read 
``Revised General Instructions A, B, C, D and F''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 18501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

5 CFR Chapter XXV

RINs 1090-AA38, 3209-AA15

Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the 
Department of the Interior

Correction

    In rule document 97-27069 beginning on page 53713, in the issue of 
Thursday October 16, 1997, make the following correction:

Sec.  3502.104  [Corrected]

    On page 53719, in the second column, in Sec. 3502.104(a), in the 
first line, ``Cross-referenced'' should read ``Cross-reference''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
STATE EX REL. Ronald Earl WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0686

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Williams v. State, 15-1187 (La. 5/20/16), 191 So.3d 1016.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           RESTORE Council Monitoring and Assessment Program      

      June 27, 2022    

View Document

The RESTORE Council Monitoring and Assessment Program (CMAP), administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), spatially and temporally inventoried programs in the Gulf of Mexico focused on water quality and habitat monitoring and mapping.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956

### Explore Search

                  - Ecosystems
                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Gulf of Mexico
                  - Alabama
                  -  Florida
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Louisiana
                  -  Mississippi
                  -  Texas

View All **
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vizario, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I
      Kelly Yang, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




*This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933
      or
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
      Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
      in
      such filing.*





/s/
                Kelly YangKelly
                Yang
              Chief
                Executive Officer, Interim Chief
              Financial
                Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer
              Date:
                February 15, 2008
CGFD33 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 26, 2021

Peter D. Russin

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−22809−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Jessica Cain

1400 Saint Charles Pl Apt 609

Hollywood, FL 33026

SSN: xxx−xx−8284

ORDER DISCHARGING TRUSTEE AND CLOSING CASE

An order dismissing the above named case has been entered. The trustee, Robin R Weiner, having filed a

final report, is discharged and this case is closed.

# # # 

Case 20-22809-PDR Doc 53 Filed 08/26/21 Page 1 of 1