alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tysheona SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida and Cornita A. Riley, as Chief of Orange County Corrections, Respondents.

Case No. 5D18-1468

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 11, 2018

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Samantha E. Habermehl, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida.

No Appearance for other Respondent.

CORRECTED

PER CURIAM.

Tysheona Smith, an incompetent defendant, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus seeking immediate release from the Orange County jail. Because the trial court had no basis to order Petitioner detained until it could make a determination as to whether Smith qualified for involuntary commitment, we grant the petition.

In October 2017, Smith was charged with possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. She was evaluated *78for competency by three experts between October 2017 and January 2018. Each concluded that she was incompetent. Thereafter, on February 16, 2018, Smith was adjudicated incompetent to proceed and placed on conditional release.

On April 24, 2018, Petitioner was arrested again and charged with possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. On May 7, 2018, the trial court adjudicated Smith incompetent to proceed based on the prior adjudication and denied conditional release. The court then ordered two of the experts that had already examined Smith to reexamine her for the purpose of determining whether she meets the criteria for involuntary hospitalization.

"[W]here... a defendant has been found incompetent to proceed and is then released upon conditions and commits a new offense, section 916.17(2)[,Florida Statutes,] leaves the trial judge with only two options: modify the conditions of release or involuntarily commit the defendant to DCFS for treatment." *Douse v. State*, 930 So.2d 838, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ; *accord**Paolercio v. State*, 129 So.3d 1174, 1175-76 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (citing *Douse*, 930 So.2d at 839 ). Here, because there was insufficient evidence at the time Smith was detained for the trial court to find that she qualified for involuntary commitment, the only other option was to release her with the appropriate conditions. *See* § 916.13(1), Fla. Stat. (2017).

Therefore, we grant the petition and direct the trial court to hold an immediate hearing to determine whether Smith's release conditions should be modified or remain the same. If the experts have already completed the reexaminations and rendered reports, the trial court should hold an immediate hearing to make the appropriate determination under section 916.17(2).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
2012 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 2012 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan 
 Eligible Employees: All managers,
directors, vice presidents and senior executives of the Company are eligible for participation in the Company’s 2012 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan. 
 Applicable Period: The 2012 Cash Incentive Program applies to performance during the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. 

Components of the Plan and Criteria to Fund: The 2012 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan consists of the following four components
(1) revenue performance on core products, (2) revenue performance on new products, (3) earnings- per-share, and (4) defined impact goals. Each component of the 2012 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan includes targets at minimum,
plan, and maximum payout. The minimum targets serve as the threshold upon which the incentive pool will begin to fund for that component. Achievement of the components at plan/target will earn the target cash incentive opportunity. Payout will be
calculated along a linear continuum from minimum to plan/target and from plan/target to maximum with the maximum target serving as the point at which the management team will earn the highest possible cash incentive opportunity. 

The minimum performance target must be met in order for a portion of the bonus to be paid relative to any one of the four components. Each component will
be measured separately. Bonus payout to corporate officers (Senior Vice Presidents and above) will be based seventy (70%) percent on achievement of revenue and earnings-per-share goals and thirty (30%) percent on corporate impact goals.
Bonus payout to Vice Presidents and below will be based seventy (70%) percent on achievement of revenue and earnings-per-share goals and thirty (30%) percent on individual impact goals. 

The following table below represents the target bonus and maximum bonus for each of the Company’s Vice Presidents and above and as a percent of such
employee’s annual base salary. 
  

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Target	 	 	Maximum	 
	 President and CEO
	  	 	80	% 	 	 	120	% 
	 Senior Vice Presidents
	  	 	40	% 	 	 	60	% 
	 Vice Presidents
	  	 	30	% 	 	 	45	%
Calvin LEWIS v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-0527

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20668 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODNEY LEE PULLINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-86-1

--------------------

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Rodney

Lee Pullins, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 

Pullins has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has

not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                               KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA








To Whom It May Concern:                                       July 31, 2002


The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of his report of
June 28, 2002 accompanying the audited financial statements of Pro-Active
Solutions, Inc., as at May 31, 2002, in the Form 10-KSB with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
________________________
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC



P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452,
Fax: (702) 436-4218, e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att.net
EXHIBIT 32.1  STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediaNet Group Technologies, Inc.., (the Company) for the three ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael B. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify that:  *  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  *  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.  Date: February 22, 2010  /s/ Michael B. Hansen Michael B. Hansen Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

53492 

Vol. 71, No. 175 

Monday, September 11, 2006 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–54351; File No. SR–Amex– 

2006–44] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice 

of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change 

and Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto 

Relating to the Listing and Trading of 

the DB Currency Index Value Fund 

Correction 

In notice document E6–14304 

beginning on page 51245 in the issue of 

Tuesday, August 29, 2006, make the 

following correction: 

On page 51255, in the second column, 

in the last two lines of the first full 

paragraph, ‘‘September 19, 2006’’ 

should read ‘‘September 13, 2006’’. 

[FR Doc. Z6–14304 Filed 9–8–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Social network models predict movement and connectivity in ecological landscapes      

      May 11, 2011    

Network analysis is on the rise across scientific disciplines because of its ability to reveal complex, and often emergent, patterns and dynamics. Nonetheless, a growing concern in network analysis is the use of limited data for constructing networks. This concern is strikingly relevant to ecology and conservation biology, where network analysis is used to infer connectivity across landscapes. In this context, movement among patches is the crucial parameter for interpreting connectivity but because of the difficulty of collecting reliable movement data, most network analysis proceeds with only indirect information on movement across landscapes rather than using observed movement to construct networks. Statistical models developed for social networks provide promising alternatives for landscape network construction because they can leverage limited movement information to predict linkages. Using two mark-recapture datasets on individual movement and connectivity across landscapes, we test whether commonly used network constructions for interpreting connectivity can predict actual linkages and network structure, and we contrast these approaches to social network models. We find that currently applied network constructions for assessing connectivity consistently, and substantially, overpredict actual connectivity, resulting in considerable overestimation of metapopulation lifetime. Furthermore, social network models provide accurate predictions of network structure, and can do so with remarkably limited data on movement. Social network models offer a flexible and powerful way for not only understanding the factors influencing connectivity but also for providing more reliable estimates of connectivity and metapopulation persistence in the face of limited data.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Brian Reichert, PhD

##### Branch Chief / Supervisory Biologist

Fort Collins Science Center

breichert@usgs.gov

970-226-9245

## Related Content

#### Brian Reichert, PhD

##### Branch Chief / Supervisory Biologist

Fort Collins Science Center

breichert@usgs.gov

970-226-9245

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-109451), Form S-3, as
amended (No. 333-127462), Form S-8 (No. 333-140084), Form S-8 (No. 333-140086),
Form  S-8, as amended (No. 333-129164) and Form S-3, as amended (No.
333-131191) of New Dragon Asia Corp. of our report dated April 6, 2009 appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Dragon Asia Corp. for the year ended
December 25, 2008.




/s/ Crowe Horwath
LLP





Sherman
Oaks, California


April
6, 2009
Order entered April 10, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01267

- CR

DEAN ALAN MATTHEWS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 207th D istrict Court

Comal County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR2016

- 544



### O RDER

Before the Court is the State’s April 8, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file

its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on or before May 10, 2019.

/s/ COR Y L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Variability of mercury concentrations in domestic well water, New Jersey Coastal Plain      

      March 16, 2010    

Concentrations of total (unfiltered) mercury (Hg) exceed the Maximum Contaminant Level (2 μg/L) in the acidic water withdrawn by more than 700 domestic wells from the areally extensive unconfined Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer system. Background concentrations of Hg generally are <0.01 μg/L. The source of the Hg contamination has been hypothesized to arise from Hg of pesticide-application, atmospheric, and geologic origin being mobilized by some component(s) of septic-system effluent or urban leachates in unsewered residential areas. Initial results at many affected wells were not reproducible upon later resampling despite rigorous quality assurance, prompting concerns that duration of well flushing could affect the Hg concentrations. A cooperative study by the U.S. Geological Survey and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection examined variability in Hg results during the flushing of domestic wells. Samples were collected at regular intervals (about 10 minutes) during flushing for eight domestic wells, until stabilization criteria was met for field-measured parameters; the Hg concentrations in the final samples ranged from about 0.0005 to 11 μg/L. Unfiltered Hg concentrations in samples collected during purging varied slightly, but particulate Hg concentration (unfiltered – filtered (0.45 micron capsule) concentration) typically was highly variable for each well, with no consistent pattern of increase or decrease in concentration. Surges of particulates probably were associated with pump cycling. Pre-pumping samples from the holding tanks generally had the lowest Hg concentrations among the samples collected at the well that day. Comparing the newly obtained results at each well to results from previous sampling indicated that Hg concentrations in water from the Hg-contaminated areas were generally greater among samples collected on different dates (long-term variations, months to years) than among samples collected on the same day (short-term variations, minutes to hours). The long-term variations likely are caused by changes in local pumping regimes and time-varying capture of slugs of Hg-contaminated water moving on flowpaths.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Zoltan Szabo

##### Research Hydrologist

New Jersey Water Science Center

zszabo@usgs.gov

609-771-3929

## Related Content

#### Zoltan Szabo

##### Research Hydrologist

New Jersey Water Science Center

zszabo@usgs.gov

609-771-3929

### Study Area

### Contact

#### New Jersey Water Science Center

3450 Princeton PikeSuite 110Lawrenceville, NJ08648United States

(609) 771-3900

(609) 771-3915

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - kirkwood-cohansey aquifer system
                  - New Jersey

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

Annette Rodriguez Case No: 20-11368-EPK

SS#:- 2205 Chapter 13

Debtor.

______________________________/

Debtor’s Motion to Pay Interest on Department of the

Treasury-Internal Revenue Service Priority Claim

The Debtor, Annette Rodriguez, by and through the undersigned attorney, files this 

Motion to Pay Interest on Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service Priority Claim 

and states:

1. The Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service is owed a priority tax claim as 

set forth in Claim #4. The Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service takes the 

legal position that interest accrues on said amount over the Chapter 13 Plan period and that 

the accrued interest is non-dischargeable.

2. The accrual of said non-dischargeable interest severely hampers the Debtor’s ability to 

effectually reorganize and jeopardizes his fresh start. Thus, the Debtor seeks to pay the 

Department of the Treasury/IRS 5% interest on the priority claim amount as set forth in 

Claim #4 (or any future amendments thereto) through the Chapter 13 Plan.

3. The undersigned counsel requests attorney fees/costs of $525.00 as a result of filing this 

motion.

WHEREFORE, the debtor respectfully requests that this Court enter and Order: (1) 

allowing the Debtor to pay the Department of the Treasury/IRS 5% interest on any priority claim 

amount in Claim #4 through any Chapter 13 Plan (including amended or modified plans); (2) 

approving $525.00 in attorney’s fees/costs; and (3) such other and further relief as the Court may 

deem just and proper. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Florida and that I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to 

Case 20-11368-EPK Doc 17 Filed 04/22/20 Page 1 of 2
practice in this Court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished to 

Robin Weiner, Trustee, PO Box 559007, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33355 and Office of the U.S. 

Trustee, 51 S.W. First Ave., Ste 1204, Miami, FL. 33130, The Department of the TreasuryInternal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7346, Philadelphia, PA. 19107-7346; William Barr, Attorney 

General of the United States: 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room 4400, Washington D.C. 20530; 

Benjamin G. Greenberg, United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida: 99 NE 4th St. Miami, 

FL. 33132; Special Assistant United States Attorney, Associate Area Counsel (SBSE) Ft. 

Lauderdale, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Ste 300, Plantation, FL. 33324; Civil Process ClerkAttorney General of the United States-Southern District of Florida, 99 NE 4 St Miami, FL. 

33132; and all creditors on the attached creditor matrix this 22nd day of April 2020.

/s/ Sean I. Koplow

SEAN I. KOPLOW, P.A.

8461 Lake Worth Rd, #204

Lake Worth, FL 33467

Tel (561)642-3000

Fax (561)965-4966

FL Bar No. 0463205

Case 20-11368-EPK Doc 17 Filed 04/22/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20504]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 24593]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 101

[Docket No. 98N-0044]
RIN 0910-AA59


Regulations on Statements Made for Dietary Supplements Concerning 
the Effect of the Product on the Structure or Function of the Body

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-11294, appearing on pages 23624-23632, 
in the issue of Wednesday, April 29, 1998, the running head``Rules and 
Regulations'' should read ``Proposed Rules''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Nicholas Scott KIPPENBERG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1568

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Collection

Program        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cores

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
Niven ANDERSON, Appellant, v. HE HILL FOUNDATION, INC., a Florida non-profit corporation, Appellee.

No. 4D18-755

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 15, 2018]

Niven Anderson, Belle Glade, pro se.

Antonio R. Perez of McGahee & Perez, PL, Clewiston, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.* Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

Gerber, C.J., Taylor and Ciklin, JJ., concur.
Darren M. FRAZIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1372

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is denied.
William Hurst PETERS III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.