alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.01

Schedule II

Independent Auditors Report



The Board of Directors and Stockholder

Royster-Clark, Inc.:



Under date of March 5, 2004, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Royster-Clark, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which are included herein. In connection with our audits of
the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
this financial statement schedule based on our audits.



In our
opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.



As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of January 1, 2002.



/s/ KPMG



March 5, 2004

Norfolk, Virginia



---

Exhibit 99.01

Schedule II

ROYSTER-CLARK, INC.



Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

(In thousands)



|                             |  |                           |  |                                    |  |               |   |  |                    
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ------------- | - |  | -------------------
|                             |  | Balancebeginningof period |  | Amountscharged tocosts andexpenses |  | Deductions(1) |   |  | Balanceend ofperiod
|Year Ended December 31, 2001 |  | 5,891                     |  | 2,980                              |  | (3,521        | ) |  | 5,350              
|Year Ended December 31, 2002 |  | 5,350                     |  | 2,630                              |  | (1,862        | ) |  | 6,118              
|Year Ended December 31, 2003 |  | 6,118                     |  | 2,148                              |  | (2,328        | ) |  | 5,938              

---

|(1) | Amounts determined not collectible, net of recoveries.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------
I,  JAMES  C.  FIELDS,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LocatePlus Holdings
Corporation  for  the  period  ended  December  31,  2004.

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant  and  we  have:

     (A)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

     (B)   evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

(C)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.  The  registrant's  other  certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

(A)   all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

(B)   any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer

               October 24, 2005
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00424**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  00424\00424_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 00424\00424_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00424\00424_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00424\00424_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00424\00424_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00424\00424_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00424\00424_telecon2.pdf Correspondence regarding survey contents. x 00424\00424_telecon3.pdf Correspondence regarding survey contents. x 00424\00424_telecon4.pdf Correspondence regarding survey contents. x 00424\00424_telecon5.pdf Correspondence regarding survey contents. x 00424\Supporting Documentation\Fwd Re Effluent Surveys.doc Correspondence regarding survey contents.

00424\Certification Statement_00424.pdf Plant certification statement 00424\Supporting Documentation\Topaz Power Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00424\00424_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00424\00424_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 12

- 1153 Filed March 12, 2014

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

RONNIE EARL HARRINGTON , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Rustin T. Davenport , Judge.

Ronnie Harrington appeals from a district court ’ s order denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence. AFFIRMED.

Ronnie Harrington , Fort Dodge , pro se

. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Jean Pettinger , Assistant Attorney General, Carlyle D. Dalen , County Attorney, and Sandra Murphy , Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by D anilson, C.J., Mullins, J., and Huitink, S.J.*

* Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2013).2

HUITINK, S.J. Ronnie Harrington was sentenced to one year of incarceration following his guilty plea to indecent exposure in vi olation of Iowa Code section 709.9 (2001). Although he had a prior sexually predatory offense, the State agreed to exclude reference to that offense, which subjected him to sentence enhancement under sections 901A.1 and 901A.2. In 2010, Harrington challe nged the sentence in a motion to correct an illegal sentence, arguing it was illegal because the first predatory sexual offense conviction and sentencing enhancement were to be stricken. This court affirmed the denial of his motion, finding both “were ind eed

stricken.” State v. Harrington , No. 10

- 1299, 2012 WL 474162, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2012). Harrington again challenged this sentence in 2012. And again, the district court denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence. In contravention of his prior challenge, Harrington now argues his sentence is illegal because he did not

receive an enhanc ed sentence due to his prior conviction. We review his challenge for correction of errors at law. See Tindell v. State , 629 N.W.2d 357, 359 (Iowa 2001). We conclude the district court properly denied Harrington’s motion. Before Harrington pled guilty, the court granted the State’s request to amend the trial information to strike the allegation of a prior sexually predatory offense. Because the State did not prove any sexually predatory offense beyond a reasonable doubt, the sentencing enhancements foun d in sections 901A.1 and 901A.2 could not be applied. An illegal sentence is one that is not authorized by

statute. State v. Wade , 757 N.W.2d 618, 628 (Iowa 2008) . Harrington’s3

sentence was authorized by statute; to apply the sentencing enhancement wher e the State did not allege and Harrington did not plead guilty to the prior offense would have been illegal. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
Jose CRUZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0653

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
Case 20-23975-LMI Doc 68 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-23975-LMI Doc 68 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-23975-LMI Doc 68 Filed 01/12/23 Page 3 of 3
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LISA A. BROCK,

Appellant,

v.

BRUCELINE MICHEL,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-3007

[April 13, 2023]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Kim Theresa Mollica, Judge; L.T. Case No. CONO-22-

005398.

Lisa A. Brock, Davie, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Thermochronology and tectonics of the Leeward Antilles: Evolution of the southern Caribbean Plate boundary zone      

      January 1, 2010    

View Document

Tectonic reconstructions of the Caribbean Plate are severely hampered by a paucity of geochronologic and exhumation constraints from anastomosed basement blocks along its southern margin. New U/Pb, 40Ar/39Ar, apatite fission track, and apatite (U-Th)/He data constrain quantitative thermal and exhumation histories, which have been used to propose a model for the tectonic evolution of the emergent parts of the Bonaire Block and the southern Caribbean Plate boundary zone. An east facing arc system intruded through an oceanic plateau during ~90 to ~87 Ma and crops out on Aruba. Subsequent structural displacements resulted in >80°C of cooling on Aruba during 70–60 Ma. In contrast, exhumation of the island arc sequence exposed on Bonaire occurred at 85–80 Ma and 55–45 Ma. Santonian exhumation on Bonaire occurred immediately subsequent to burial metamorphism and may have been driven by the collision of a west facing island arc with the Caribbean Plate. Island arc rocks intruded oceanic plateau rocks on Gran Roque at ~65 Ma and exhumed rapidly at 55–45 Ma. We attribute Maastrichtian-Danian exhumation on Aruba and early Eocene exhumation on Bonaire and Gran Roque to sequential diachronous accretion of their basement units to the South American Plate. Widespread unconformities indicate late Eocene subaerial exposure. Late Oligocene–early Miocene dextral transtension within the Bonaire Block drove subsidence and burial of crystalline basement rocks of the Leeward Antilles to ≤1 km. Late Miocene–recent transpression caused inversion and ≤1 km of exhumation, possibly as a result of the northward escape of the Maracaibo Block.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael Cosca

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

mcosca@usgs.gov

303-236-4974

## Related Content

#### Michael Cosca

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

mcosca@usgs.gov

303-236-4974

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200

### Explore Search

                  - Caribbean Plate

View All **
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6249** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v.
GREGORY BLANKS , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dist rict of Virginia , at New Bern
. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. ( 7:04

- cr - 00076

- FL

- 1 )

Submitted : July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

G regory B l anks, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Blanks appeals the district cou rt’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.
Crim. P. 35 motion on his behalf, or for a sentence reduction based upon his allegedly substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Blanks , No. 7:04

- cr - 00076

- FL

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argumen t would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

55321

Vol. 62, No. 205

Thursday, October 23, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97-146-005]

U-T Offshore System; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

Correction

In notice document 97–27191

appearing on page 53616, in the issue of

Wednesday, October 15, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 53616, in the second column,

the Docket No. should be as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation

and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 920

[MD-043-FOR]

Maryland Regulatory Program

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–24986,

appearing on page 49183, in the issue of

Friday, September 19, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 49183, in the third column,

under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION, in the second

paragraph, in the 11th line, ‘‘rescue’’

should read ‘‘recuse’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 24, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10724]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 417

[OMC-009-FC]
RIN 0938-AG92


Medicare Program; Qualified Health Maintenance Organizations

CFR Correction

    In title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 400 to 429, 
revised as of October 1, 1995, on pages 587 through 599, Secs. 417.912 
through 417.919, 417.921 through 417.926, 417.932, 417.933, 417.935, 
and 417.936 were inadvertently published and should be removed.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102 (Friday, May 24, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10524]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 102 / Friday, May 24, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 26253]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 3


Ethics Training for Registrants

Correction

    In rule document 96-10730, beginning on page 20127, in the issue of 
Monday, May 6, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 20128, in the first column, under EFFECTIVE DATE: 
``applicable date shall be August 6, 1996.'' should read ``applicable 
date shall be July 5, 1996.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 13, 2011 

# Order

June 13, 2011

142865(28)

TIMOTHY PAUL BAY, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 142865 v CoA: 301183 Ingham CC: 09-1517-NM CLINTON CANADY, III and CANADY LAW FIRM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ ______________

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipul ation by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal is considered and the application is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Volcano, earthquake, and tsunami hazards of the Cascadia Subduction Zone      

      August 1, 2022    

Subduction zones produce some of Earth’s most devastating geological events. Recent eruptions of Mount St. Helens and great earthquakes and tsunamis in Japan and Sumatra provide stark examples of the destructive power of subduction-related hazards. In the Cascadia subduction zone, large earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions have occurred in the past and geologic records imply that these events will occur in the future. As the population and infrastructure increase in the region, resilience to these natural hazards requires a detailed scientific understanding of the geologic forces and processes involved, combined with a society motivated to mitigate risks.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Elizabeth Westby

##### Geologist / Communications Specialist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

lwestby@usgs.gov

360-993-8979

## Related Content

#### Elizabeth Westby

##### Geologist / Communications Specialist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

lwestby@usgs.gov

360-993-8979

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Cascadia subduction zone
                  - california
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Washington

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Selenium Recycling in the United States in 2004      

      January 1, 2009    

The vast majority of selenium consumption in the United States is in dissipative uses, such as alloys, animal feeds, fertilizers, glass decolorizer, and pigments. The nondissipative use as a photoreceptor for xerographic copiers is declining. As a result of a lack of a substantial supply of selenium-containing scrap, there are no longer selenium recycling facilities in the United States. Selenium-containing materials collected for recycling, primarily selenium-containing photocopier drums, are exported for processing in other countries. Of the estimated 350 metric tons (t) of selenium products that went to the U.S. market in 2004, an estimated 300 t went to dissipative uses. An estimated 4 t was recovered from old scrap and exported for recycling.

## Citation Information
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: February 7 , 2007 |   |                      |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                     |   |                      |
|                     |   |                      |
|                     | BY:    | /s/ NICHOLAS DISCOMBE     |
|                     |   | Nicholas Discombe         |
|                     |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                     |   |                      |
|                     |   |                      |
| Dated: February 7, 2007  |   |                      |
|                     |   |                      |
|                     |   |                      |
|                     | BY:    | /s/ WILLIAM F. EVANS      |
|                     |   | William F. Evans          |
|                     |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Witness Systems, Inc. and will be retained by WitnessSystems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
Order filed November 19, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 10

- 00603

- CV

____________ JUVENAL ALVARADO AND FELICIANO ALVARADO , Appellant s
V.
ROBERT GROCE DILL, I NDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/ A ARROW TOWING, SAMUEL LEE THOMPSON, BROCK KE ITH DION, SOON PHAT, L.P., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B /A CHARLESTON COURT APARTMENTS, YIN SOON CHOI, DERSI NG, INC. AND MESHA B OYLES AKA MESHA

KYOMI STEWART, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 13757



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T ex as R ule of App ellate P rocedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 46

.The clerk of the 334th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this cour t

the original of Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 46, on or before November 26, 2012

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon complet ion of inspection, to return the original of Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 46, to the clerk of the 334th District Court.

PER CURIAM