alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VMH VideoMovieHouse.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Steven Gaspar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 5th day of October, 2004.



| | /s/ Steven Gaspar                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Steven Gaspar                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 67724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-41208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE PRESIDENT

3 CFR

Proclamation 7153 of December 1, 1998


World AIDS Day, 1998

Correction

    In Proclamation 7153 of December 1, 1998, in the issue of December 
4, 1998, on page 66978, the document filing line, which erroneously 
reads ``Filed 12-4-98; 8:45 am]'', should read ``Filed 12-3-98; 8:45 
am]''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CARLILE BRELAND,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-2083

Opinion filed January 20, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Carlile Breland, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED as moot.

ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Fabulous Fritas Corporation
File No. 333-70868


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Fabulous  Fritas  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Roger
E.  Pawson,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 7, 2006            By:  /s/ Roger E. Pawson
------------------------            ----------------------------
                                    Roger E. Pawson
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer




-------------------------------------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fabulous Fritas  Corporation and will be retained by Fabulous Fritas
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Rodney L. Underdown, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Compass MineralsGroup, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  (omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238);  (c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.    COMPASS MINERALS GROUP, INC.   Date: March 15, 2005      /s/ Rodney Underdown   Rodney UnderdownChief Financial Officer and Vice President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(18)
              - arizona(2601)
              - arkansas(7)
              - california(451)
              - colorado(420)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(8)
              - idaho(163)
              - illinois(5)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(41)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(5)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(6)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(125)
              - nebraska(57)
              - nevada(426)
              - (-)new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(533)
              - new york(10)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(36)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(31)
              - oregon(136)
              - pennsylvania(5)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(50)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(95)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(551)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(8)
              - washington(98)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(11)
              - wyoming(225)

## By Year

Data Release        September 30, 2020        Microplastics data collected from streams in the northeastern United States, 2017-2018

publication        January 1, 2004        Collection, analysis, and age-dating of sediment cores from 56 U.S. lakes and reservoirs sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1992-2001

National News Release        December 4, 2014        Get Your Wheels Spinning

publication        July 15, 2020        Assessing the vulnerability of military installations in the coterminous United States to potential biome shifts resulting from rapid climate change
Case 20-12877-LMI    Doc 33    Filed 07/09/20    Page 1 of 3

Case 20-12877-LMI    Doc 33    Filed 07/09/20    Page 2 of 3

Case 20-12877-LMI    Doc 33    Filed 07/09/20    Page 3 of 3
Case 21-12238-LMI Doc 7-1 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-12238-LMI Doc 7-1 Filed 03/08/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-12238-LMI Doc 7-1 Filed 03/08/21 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 143 (Thursday, July 24, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-15848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Proposed Extension of Information Collection Request Submitted 
for Public Comment; Proposed Amendment to PTE 84-14 for Plan Asset 
Transactions Determined by Independent Qualified Professional Asset 
Managers

Correction

    In notice document E8-15848 appearing on page 40384 in the issue of 
Monday, July 14, 2008 make the following correction:
    In the first column, in the second paragraph, in the DATES section 
is corrected to read: ``Written comments must be submitted to the 
office shown in the ADDRESSES section on or before September 12, 
2008.''
[FR Doc. Z8-15848 Filed 7-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Page 1 of 2

MMM-LF-16 (rev. 04/01/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Roberto Francisco Orue, II Case No.: 21-10553-MAM

SS#: 3378 Chapter 13

 Debtor(s).

____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPROVE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION

AGREEMENT WITH FREEDOM MORTGAGE

This matter came before the Court:

On the Debtor’s Ex Parte Motion to Approve Mortgage Modification 

Agreement with Freedom Mortgage (“Lender”).

For hearing on ________________, upon Self-Represented Debtor’s 

Motion to Approve Mortgage Modification Agreement with Lender.

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 20, 2021.

Case 21-10553-MAM Doc 49 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

MMM-LF-16 (rev. 04/01/15)

The Court, having considered the motion and being otherwise fully advised in the 

premises, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion to Approve Mortgage Modification Agreement between the 

Debtor and Freedom Mortgage (“Lender”) regarding real property located at 

7667 NW Greenspring Street, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34987 is granted. 

2. The parties are authorized to take any and all necessary actions to 

effectuate the terms of the Agreement.

3. The Debtor shall immediately file a Motion to Modify Plan to provide for the 

payments due under the Agreement.

4. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement and 

this Order.

###

Submitted By: 

Law Firm of Hoskins, Turco, Lloyd & Lloyd

By: Colin V. Lloyd, Esquire

Florida Bar No.: 0165182

302 South Second Street

Fort Pierce, FL 34950

(772) 464-4600

(772) 465-4747 fax

Debtor’s attorney shall serve a conformed copy of this Order upon all parties of interest 

and shall file a Certificate of Service in accordance with Local Rule 2002-1(F). 

Case 21-10553-MAM Doc 49 Filed 09/21/21 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MOHAMED ABDALLA MAHMOUD, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 84880 

FILED 

JUL 0 8 2022 

EUZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERVFAUPREME COURT 

BY • 

pEpure CLERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 

motion to withdraw plead of guilt." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark 

County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge. 

This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a 

jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the order on 

August 5, 2020. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until 

June 13, 2022, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period 

described by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest 

jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 

946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider 

this appeal, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Silver 

J. 

Cadish Pickering 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, Chief Judge 

Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A MOP> 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Watershed scale response to climate change--Starkweather Coulee Basin, North Dakota      

      March 19, 2012    

General Circulation Model simulations of future climate through 2099 project a wide range of possible scenarios. To determine the sensitivity and potential effect of long-term climate change on the freshwater resources of the United States, the U.S. Geological Survey Global Change study, "An integrated watershed scale response to global change in selected basins across the United States" was started in 2008. The long-term goal of this national study is to provide the foundation for hydrologically based climate change studies across the nation.

Fourteen basins for which the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System has been calibrated and evaluated were selected as study sites. Precipitation Runoff Modeling System is a deterministic, distributed parameter watershed model developed to evaluate the effects of various combinations of precipitation, temperature, and land use on streamflow and general basin hydrology. Output from five General Circulation Model simulations and four emission scenarios were used to develop an ensemble of climate-change scenarios for each basin. These ensembles were simulated with the corresponding Precipitation Runoff Modeling System model. This fact sheet summarizes the hydrologic effect and sensitivity of the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System simulations to climate change for the Starkweather Coulee Basin near Webster, North Dakota.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Starkweather Coulee Basin
                  - North Dakota

View All **
Cynthia Proctor BEDELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018

Dustin Dewrell, Shalimar, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DENIED .

Ray and Bilbrey, JJ., concur; Winokur, J., concurs with opinion.

Winokur, J., concurring.

The State argues that the opinion should be clarified to dispel any suggestion that "a urine test for alcohol is available or even necessary before consent to a blood test is upheld." According to the motion, under section 316.1932(1)(c) the State must show that administration of a urine test was impractical or impossible, thus supporting a blood draw, only when the officer has reason to believe that the suspect was under the influence of a *controlled substance* . When the officer believes the suspect was under the influence of *alcohol* , as here, the State must only show that administration of a *breath* test was impractical or impossible before resorting to a blood draw, according to the motion. This is because, the motion claims, no urine test can detect the amount of alcohol in the blood stream, so the Legislature must have meant to limit urine tests in this context to suspicion of driving under the influence of controlled substances. The State supports this contention with citations to circuit court opinions, as well as the Florida DUI Handbook.

I agree that clarification on this point is unnecessary, for two reasons. First, the question of whether a urine test was impractical or impossible before police could resort to a blood draw was always part of this case. If in fact the State was not required to prove this point, that suggestion did not appear here. Second, it is not clear that section 316.1932(1)(c) makes the distinction that the State asserts in its motion. Whether such a distinction exists will have to wait upon another case, one where this issue is properly before the Court.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

2449

Vol. 63, No. 10

Thursday, January 15, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. RP98–105–000 and RP89–183–

076]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas

Tariff

Correction

In notice document 98–641, beginning

on page 1846, in the issue of Monday,

January 12, 1998, the docket numbers

should appear as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service

Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention; Statement of Organization,

Functions, and Delegations of

Authority

Correction

In notice document 97–32256,

beginning on page 65088, in the issue of

Wednesday, December 10, 1997, make

the following corrections:

1. On page 65088, in the second

column, in the second paragraph, in the

second line, ‘‘Communicty’’ should read

‘‘Community’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, in the third paragraph, in the

11th line, ‘‘officer’’should read

‘‘offices’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: DAMARIS TRAVIESO CASE NUMBER: 20-17395-LMI

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for November 3, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the November 3, 

2020 hearing were due as of October 16, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to 

"re-sending" documents)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confers service, and agrees on the record:

Remains unresolved from prior deficiency

Due by 5 pm on 11/5 or DISMISS, if received Cont. to 12/1: 1) bank stmts #0622 (6/1-7/6) & #0614 (7/1-

7/6); 2) issue with objection to poc 20

Case 20-17395-LMI Doc 38 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.3

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I,
John A. Luke, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MeadWestvaco Corporation, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of MeadWestvaco Corporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report

Date: April 20, 2015



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/ John A. Luke, Jr.                                 
|Name: John A. Luke, Jr. Title: Chief
Executive Officer