alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           On the use of magnetic cleaning in paleointensity studies      

      October 31, 1969    

The use of partial alternating field demagnetization and, to a lesser extent, partial thermal demagnetization has been found useful as a means of removing secondary components of magnetization from rocks used in certain methods of determining paleointensities. During the course of this investigation, which was carried out on lavas erupted during historic times, it was also learned that a partial remanence characterized by relatively low coercivity possessed blocking temperatures throughout the blocking temperature spectrum. On the other hand, a partial remanence characterized by low blocking temperatures possessed only low coercivity.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - hawaii

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ivan
Bial, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Ivan Bial
Ivan Bial
Director, Secretary and
Principle Financial Officer


August 12, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-10999

_______________

ANDREW L. SMITH,

PlaintiffCounter DefendantAppelleeCross Appellant,

VERSUS

CLAYTON J. SMITH, et al.,

Defendants,

CLAYTON J. SMITH,

MARK L. SMITH,

and

SMITH PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.,

DefendantsCounter ClaimantsAppellantsCross Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:92-CV-170-D)

_________________________

November 17, 1997

Before WISDOM, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the

record and have heard the arguments of counsel, regarding both the

appeal and the cross-appeal. We are convinced that the district

court committed no reversible error and did a commendable job of

sorting out and ruling on the various claims and disputes in this

case. We are hopeful that this seemingly endless litigation will

soon come to a close.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)

## By Year

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Request Form

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cuttings Sampling Protocol

Illustrations        December 31, 2019        Arizona Landsat State Mosaic
Randall L. WRIGHT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - california(3)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!

Satellite imagery        August 31, 2009        Impact

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
Form CGFCRD3T (06/11/22)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−12609−AJC

Chapter: 15

In re:

Performance Insurance Company SPC

c/o Sequor Law

1111 Brickell Avenue

Suite 1250

Miami, FL 33131

EIN: 00−0000000

Neil Dempsey

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable A. Jay Cristol to consider the

following:

Motion to Authorize Distribution of Estate Funds Held in the United States to the Cayman Islands

Filed by Foreign Representatives Neil Dempsey, Kenneth M. Krys. ECF#56

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: November 10, 2022

Time: 02:00 PM

Location: Telephone by CourtSolutions LLC

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by telephone. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Individuals not

represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services free of charge. Although conducted

by telephone, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed.

All participants must exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with

the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 11/1/22 CLERK OF COURT

By: Susan Gutierrez

Courtroom Deputy

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 59 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 16218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10404]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 16218]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Parts 300 and 319

[Docket No. 96-046-1]


Importation of Fruits and Vegetables

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-7455, beginning on page 14037, in the 
issue of Tuesday, March 25, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 14039, in the first column, in Garlic From Romania, in the 
first paragraph, in the third garlic treatment, in the first line, ``40 
g/m<SUP>3 (2 lbs/1000 ft<SUP>3)'' should read ``40 g/m<SUP>3 (2 1/2 
lbs/1000 ft<SUP>3)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           What we know and don't know about amphibian declines in the West      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

The problem of declining amphibian species is thought to be particularly acute in western North America, but there are many gaps in our knowledge. Although several declines have been well-documented, other declines are anecdotal or hypothesized. Most documented declines are of ranid frogs or toads (Bufo). Species from montane habitats and those occurring in California have been best studied. Status of many desert species is unknown. Habitat destruction and introduced predators are the most common threats to amphibian populations. Some declines may represent natural variation in population size. Causes have not been determined for several cases where common species have declined over large areas. There are important considerations for ecosystem management, whether changes in amphibian populations are natural or caused by human activities. Causes for declines must be known so that management can be prescribed (or proscribed) to eliminate or minimize these causes. The natural variability of amphibian population numbers and the complexity of metapopulation structure emphasize the necessity of considering multiple temporal and spatial scales in ecosystem management. The decline of amphibian species throughout the world has received considerable recent attention (e.g., Blaustein and Wake 1990, Griffiths and Beebee 1992, Yoffe 1992). Much of this attention derives from a workshop held in February, 1990 on declining amphibians sponsored by the National Research Council Board (NRC) on Biology in Irvine, California (Barinaga 1990, Borchelt 1990). Because of media attention in the aftermath of this conference, it is a popular perception that amphibian declines are a new phenomenon that herpetologists have been slow to recognize (Griffiths and Beebee 1992, Quammen 1993). However, concern about amphibian populations in the United States dates back over 20 years. Beginning in the 1960s, a large, well-documented decline of northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) occurred in the upper Midwest (Gibbs et al. 1971, Hine, 1981, Rittshof 1975).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report of ShengdaTech, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Xiangzhi Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Report:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/
      Xiangzhi ChenXiangzhi
      ChenChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principle
      Executive Officer)
 
 Dated:
July 29, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

3335

Vol. 62, No. 14

Wednesday, January 22, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Parts 600 and 660

[Docket No. 961227373-6373-01; I.D.

122096B]

RIN 0648-XX78

Correction

Magnuson Act Provisions; Foreign

Fishing; Fisheries off West Coast

States and in the Western Pacific;

Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;

Annual Specifications and

Management Measures

Document 96--33402 was

inadvertently published in the Proposed

Rules section of Monday, January 6,

1997, beginning on page 700. It should

have appeared in the Rules and

Regulations section.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts, 8, 31, 71, 91, and 107

[GGD 85–010]

RIN 2115–AF11

Correction

In rule document 96–32801,

beginning on page 68510, in the issue of

Friday, December 27, 1996, make the

following corrections.

1. On page 68510, in the first column,

in the first line of the title, ‘‘Alternative’’

should read ‘‘Alternate’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, in the second line of the

DATES: section, ‘‘1997’’ should read

‘‘1996’’.

3. On the same page in the same

column, in the last line of the DATES:

section, ‘‘1997’’ should read ‘‘1996’’.

4. On page 68511, in the second

column, in the fourth line under Notice

of Proposed Rulemaking, ‘‘compliance’’

should read ‘‘Compliance’’.

5. On the same page, in the same

column, in the fifth line from the

bottom, ‘‘ABW’’ should read ‘‘ABS’’.

6. On page 68512, in the third

column, in the thirteenth line,

‘‘deceived’’ should read ‘‘described’’.

7. On page 68513, in the first column,

in the ninth line of the first paragraph,

‘‘Coats’’ should read ‘‘Coast’’.

§ 8.120 [Corrected]

8. On page 68518, in the second

column, in the seventh line of

§ 8.120(b), ‘‘authorizes’’ should read

‘‘authorities’’.

§ 8.130 [Corrected]

9. On the same page, in the same

column, in the ninth line of

§ 8.130(a)(4), ‘‘coast’’ should read

‘‘Coast’’.

10. On the same page, in the third

column, in the first line of § 8.130(a)(5),

‘‘commandant’’ should read

‘‘Commandant’’.

§ 8.320 [Corrected]

11. On page 68520, in § 8.320(b)(9),

‘‘MORPOL’’ should read ‘‘MARPOL’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D, 1997 / Corrections
Christopher HILLFIGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I,  JAMES  C.  FIELDS,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LocatePlus Holdings
Corporation  for  the  period  ended  December  31,  2004.

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant  and  we  have:

     (A)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

     (B)   evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

(C)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.  The  registrant's  other  certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

(A)   all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

(B)   any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer

               May  17,  2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 14737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-38286; File No. SR-CBOE-96-70]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, 
Inc., Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Reporting 
Requirements for Securities Accounts and Orders of Market-Makers and 
Joint Account Provisions

February 13, 1997.

Correction

    In notice document 97-4387, beginning on page 8287 in the issue of 
Monday, February 24, 1997, make the following correction:
     On page 8289, in the first column, ``Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy 
Secretary'' should be added as the signature line at the end of the 
document.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Nathalian MALO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0092

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1980        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
## IC Data Part II Addendum

Instrument Filename Document Type (Select One) Form Name and No. Available

Electronically? Electronic Capability (Select One) Obligation to Respond (select one) Affected Public (check all that apply) IC 4 Appendix D Form

If other is chosen, please provide type of document in the field provided below. **District -**  **level data request memo**  Yes No Fillable Fileable Voluntary Federal Government Individuals or Households Private Sector Business or other for

- profit Not

- for

- profit Institutions Farms State, Local or Tribal Gov’t Can Be Submitted Electronically? URL: Yes No Electronic Repository: Percent Reporting Electronically 100 % IC 5 Appendix E 1 Form

If other is chosen, please provide type of document in the field provided below. **Principal Survey advance letter**  Yes No Paper Only Voluntary Federal Government Individuals or Households Private Sector Business or other for

- profit Not

- for

- profit Institutions Farms State, Local or Tribal Gov’t Can Be Submitted Electronically? URL: Yes No Percent Reporting Electronically Electronic Repository: 0 % IC 6 Appendix E2 Form

If other is chosen, please provide type of document in the field provided below. **Principal Log advance letter**  Yes No Paper Only Voluntary Federal Government Individuals or Households Private Sector Business or other for

- profit Not

- for

- profit Institutions Farms State, Local or Tribal Gov’t Can Be Submitted Electronically? URL: Yes No Percent Reporting Electronically Electronic Repository: 0 % IC 7 Appendix E3 Form and Instructions

If other is chosen, please provide type of document in the field provided below. **Teacher Survey advance letter**  Yes No Paper Only Voluntary Federal Government Individuals or Households Private Sector Business or other for

- profit Not

- for

- profit Institutions Farms State, Local or Tribal Gov’t Can Be Submitted Electronically? URL: Yes No Percent Reporting Electronically Electronic Repository: 0 %
Can Be Submitted Electronically? URL: Yes No Percent Reporting Electronically Electronic Repository: 0 %