## 32716 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2014 / Notices

14 Big Data Report at 45.

15 PCAST Report at 39.

16 Id. at 21.

17 Id. at 38.

18 Id. at 39. 19 Big Data Report at 51, 53.

20 Id. at 49.

21 PCAST Report at 40–41.

22 Id. at 41. 23 See National Institute of Standards and Technology, Privacy Engineering Workshop (Apr. 9–10, 2014), available at: http://www.nist.gov/itl/ csd/privacy-engineering-workshop.cfm. 

### individuals.’’ 14 

### How significant are such risks? How could they be addressed in the context of the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights? Should they be? Should potential privacy legislation impose similar obligations with respect to uses of data that are not currently regulated?

9. How significant are the privacy risks posed by unindexed data backups and other ‘‘latent information about individuals?’’ 15 

### Do standard methods exist for determining whether data is sufficiently obfuscated and/or unavailable as to be irretrievable as a practical matter?

10. The PCAST Report notes that ‘‘data fusion occurs when data from different sources are brought into contact and new, often unexpected, phenomena emerge;’’ this process ‘‘frequently results in the identification of individual people,’’ even when the underlying data sources were not linked to individuals’ identities. 16 

### How significant are the privacy risks associated with this? How should entities performing big data analysis implement individuals’ requests to delete personal data when previously unassociated information becomes associated with an individual at a subsequent date? Do existing systems enable entities to log and act on deletion requests on an ongoing basis?

11. As the PCAST Report explains, ‘‘itis increasingly easy to defeat [deidentification of personal data] by the very techniques that are being developed for many legitimate applications of big data.’’ 17 

### However, de-identification may remain useful as an added safeguard in some contexts, particularly when employed in combination with policy safeguards. 18 

### How significant are the privacy risksposed by re-identification of deidentified data? How can deidentification be used to mitigate privacy risks in light of the analytical capabilities of big data? Can particular policy safeguards bolster the effectiveness of de-identification? Does the relative efficacy of de-identification depend on whether it is applied to public or private data sets? Can differential privacy mitigate risks in some cases? What steps could the government or private sector take to expand the capabilities and practical application of these techniques?

12. The Big Data Report concludes that ‘‘big data technologies can cause societal harms beyond damages to privacy, such as discrimination against individuals and groups’’ and warns ‘‘big data could enable new forms of discrimination and predatory practices.’’ 19 

### The Report states that ‘‘it is the responsibility of government to ensure that transformative technologies are used fairly’’ and urges agencies to determine ‘‘how to protect citizens from new forms of discrimination that may be enabled by big data technologies.’’ 20 

### Should the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights address the risk of discriminatory effects resulting from automated decision processes using personal data, and if so, how? How could consumer privacy legislation (either alone or in combination with anti-discrimination laws) make a useful contribution to addressing this concern? Should big data analytics be accompanied by assessments of the potential discriminatory impacts on protected classes? Possible Approaches to Big Data Suggested by the Reports and the Big Data Workshops

13. Can accountability mechanisms play a useful role in promoting socially beneficial uses of big data while safeguarding privacy? Should ethics boards, privacy advisory committees, consumer advisory boards, or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) be consulted when practical limits frustrate transparency and individuals’ control over their personal information? How could such entities be structured? How might they be useful in the commercial context? Can privacy impact assessments and third-party audits complement the work of such entities? What kinds of parameters would be valuable for different kinds of big data analysts to consider, and what kinds of incentives might be most effective in promoting their consideration?

14. Would a system using ‘‘privacy preference profiles,’’ as discussed in Section 4.5.1 of the PCAST Report, mitigate privacy risks regarding big data analysis? 21



### 15. Related to the concept of ‘‘privacy preference profiles,’’ some have urged that privacy preferences could be attached to and travel with personal data (in the form of metadata), thereby enabling recipients of data to know how to handle the data. 22 

### Could such an approach mitigate privacy risks regarding big data analysis? 16. Would the development of a framework for privacy risk management be an effective mechanism for addressing challenges with big data? 23



### 17. Can emerging privacy enhancing technologies mitigate privacy risks to individuals while preserving the benefits of robust aggregate data sets?

18. How can the approaches and issues addressed in Questions 14–17 be accommodated within the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights?

19. What other approaches to big data could be considered to promote privacy?

20. What other questions should we be asking about big data and consumer privacy?

Dated: June 3, 2014. Angela M. Simpson, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information. [FR Doc. 2014–13195 Filed 6–5–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–60–P**



### COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM **PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED** 

**Procurement List Proposed Additions and Deletions** 

**AGENCY** 

### : Committee for Purchase from People Who are Blind or Severely Disabled.

**ACTION** 

### : Proposed Additions to and Deletions from the Procurement List.

**SUMMARY** 

### : The Committee is proposing to add products and services to the Procurement List that will be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities, and deletes products and a service previously furnished by such agencies.

**DATES** 

### : Comments must be received on or before: 7/7/2014.

**ADDRESSES** 

### : Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 22202–4149.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### : This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.


## 32717 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2014 / Notices

Additions

If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to procure the products and services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

The following products and services are proposed for addition to the Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Products
NSN: 8540–00–NIB–0093—Tissue, Toilet, 1- Ply, White, 96 rolls NSN: 8540–00–NIB–0094—Tissue, Toilet, 2- Ply, White, 96 rolls NPA: Outlook-Nebraska, Inc., Omaha, NE Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, New York, NY Coverage: A-List for the Total Government Requirement as aggregated by the General Services Administration, New York, NY.
NSN: 7490–00–NIB–0044—Paper Shredder, High Security, Level 6, Cabinet Style NSN: 7490–00–NIB–0045—Paper Shredder, Desk-Side, Personal, Level 3, Cross-Cut NPA: L.C. Industries, Inc., Durham, NC Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, New York, NY Coverage: A-List for the Total Government Requirement as aggregated by the General Services Administration, New York, NY.

Individual Lockout Devices
NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0160—Safety Padlock, Red, 1.5′′ Shackle NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0162—Hasp, Steel with Tabs, 1 ′′ NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0163—Large Plug Lockout with Label NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0164—Small Plug Lockout with Label NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0166—Gate Valve Lockout, 1 ′′ to 2–1 ⁄ fxsp0;2′′ NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0169—Gate Valve Lockout, 2–1/2 ′′ to 5′′ NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0183—Wall Switch Lockout NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0204—Universal Single Circuit Breaker Lockout NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0205—Universal Multipole Circuit Breaker Lockout NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0208—Hasp, 1.5′′ Steel with Tabs NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0213—Cable/Valve/ Hasp Lockout Device NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0220—6 Lockout Padlocks, Nylon, Red NSN: 5340–00–NIB–0221—3 Lockout Padlocks, Nylon, Red Lockout/Tagout Kits
NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0161—Lockout Tags, 25- pack NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0185—Kit, Lockout, Electrical/Valve with AC Sensor NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0202—Lockout/Tagout Station, 3 Padlocks NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0203—Lockout/Tagout Station, 8 Padlocks NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0207—AC Sensor, 50V– 1000V NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0228—Medium Electrical Lockout Kit with Breaker Lockouts NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0229—Large Electrical Lockout Kit NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0230—Large Electrical/ Valve Lockout Kit NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0231—Small Standard Lockout Kit NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0232—Extra Small Personal Electrical Lockout Kit NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0233—Small Electrical Lockout Kit NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0234—Small Electrical Lockout Kit with Plug Lockouts NSN: 4240–00–NIB–0236—Small Electrical Valve Lockout Kit NPA: Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired—Goodwill Industries of Greater Rochester, Rochester, New York Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA Coverage: B-List for the Broad Government requirement as aggregated by the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA. Broom, Sweeping
NSN: 7920–00–NIB–0570—Extra-Rough Surface, 24′′ Block with 60′′ Handle NSN: 7920–00–NIB–0571—Smooth Surface,
24′′ Block with 60′′ Handle NSN: 7920–00–NIB–0572—Medium Surface,
24′′ Block with 60′′ Handle NPA: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West Allis, WI Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, Fort Worth, TX Coverage: B-List for the Broad Government Requirement as aggregated by the General Services Administration, Fort Worth, TX.
NSN: 5120–00–900–6103—Hammer—3 lb, Cross-Peen, 15′′ Fiberglass Handle, Cushioned Grip NPA: Keystone Vocational Services, Inc., Sharon, PA Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, Tools Acquisition Division I, Kansas City, MO Coverage: B-List for the Broad Government Requirement as aggregated by the General Services Administration, Kansas City, MO. NSN: MR 331—Pitter, Cherry and Olive NSN: MR 332—Peeler, Corn NSN: MR 335—Squeezer, Citrus, Aluminum NSN: MR 896—Turner, Flexible, Thin,
11.5 ′′X12 ′′X4′′ NPA: Cincinnati Association for the Blind, Cincinnati, OH Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA Coverage: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA. NSN: MR 604—Drinking Straws, Flexible, Clear, 180ct NSN: MR 10663—Pouf Balls, Bath, Toddler NSN: MR 10674—Funnel, Collapsible NSN: MR 10679—Baster, Bottletop NPA: Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind, Inc., Winston-Salem, NC Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA Coverage: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA. NSN: MR 399—Set, Cookie Cutter, Assorted, 3PC NPA: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West Allis, WI Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA Coverage: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA. Battery
NSN: 6135–01–372–5191—NEDA 1811A,Non-Rechargeable, 12.0V, AlkalineManganese Dioxide Zinc NSN: 6135–01–174–8057—NEDA 1166A,Non-Rechargeable, 1.5V, AlkalineManganese Dioxide NSN: 6140–01–413–3926—NEDA 1.2H2, Rechargeable, 1.2V, Nickel-Metal Hydride, PG/4 NSN: 6140–01–467–3225—NEDA 1.2H2, Rechargeable, 1.2V, Nickel-Metal Hydride, PG/2. NSN: 6135–01–394–8087—NEDA 1168A,Non-Rechargeable, 1.5V, AlkalineManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–268–2151—NEDA 1414A,Non-Rechargeable, 6.0V, AlkalineManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–314–8415—NEDA 5000LC, Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, Lithium NSN: 6135–01–526–6530—NEDA 5003LC,Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, LithiumManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–210–8715—NEDA 5004LC,Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, LithiumManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–320–4815—NEDA 5011LC, Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, Lithium NSN: 6135–01–263–3611—NEDA 5012LC,Non-rechargeable, 3.0V, LithiumManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–522–2463—NEDA 5021LC, Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, Lithium Manganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–462–4007—NEDA 5032LC,Non-Rechargeable, 6.0V, LithiumManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–534–0310—NEDA 5046LC,Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, LithiumManganese Dioxide NSN: 6135–01–138–8157—NEDA 7003ZD, Non-Rechargeable, 1.4V, Zinc Air NSN: 6135–01–586–4220—NEDA 5018LC, Non-Rechargeable, 3.0V, Lithium Photo NPA: Eastern Carolina Vocational Center, Inc., Greenville, NC Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Columbus, OH Coverage: C-List for 100% of the requirement of the Department of Defense, as aggregated by the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Columbus, OH.
NSN: 6850–01–560–6131—Calcium, Lime, and Rust Remover, 5 GL NPA: The Lighthouse for the Blind, St. Louis,


## 32718 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 109 / Friday, June 6, 2014 / Notices

MO Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Richmond, VA Coverage: A-List for the Total Government Requirement as aggregated by the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Richmond, VA.

Services Service Type/Location: Custodial Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Atlanta Large TRACON, 784 Highway 74 South, Peachtree City, GA NPA: New Ventures Enterprises, Inc., LaGrange, GA Contracting Activity: Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, College Park, GA Service Type/Location: Fleet Maintenance, U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Agent Operations Eastern Command, Office of Secure Transportation, Transportation Safeguards Training Site, Fort Chaffee, AR, 11408 Roberts Blvd., Fort Smith, AR NPA: Skookum Educational Programs, Bremerton, WA Contracting Activity: Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administion Business Services Division, Washington, DC



### Deletions

The following products and service are proposed for deletion from the Procurement List:

Products Ergo Aluminum Broom Handle & Mophead

NSN: 7920–01–503–1669 NSN: 7920–01–503–1670 NSN: 7920–01–503–1671 NSN: 7920–01–503–1672 NSN: 7920–01–503–5365 NSN: 7920–01–503–5366 NSN: 7920–01–503–5367 NPA: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West Allis, WI Contracting Activities: Department Of Veterans Affairs, NAC, Hines, IL; General Services Administration, Fort Worth, TX

Service Service Type/Location: Linen Distribution, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1900 East Main Street, Danville, IL NPA: WorkSource Enterprises, NFP, Danville, IL Contracting Activity: Department Of Veterans Affairs, 251-Network Contract Office 11, Indianapolis, IN
Barry S. Lineback, Director, Business Operations. [FR Doc. 2014–13317 Filed 6–5–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6353–01–P** 

### CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY **COMMISSION**
**[Docket No. CPSC–2011–0014]**


### Submission for OMB Review; **Comment Request— Generic Clearance for the Collection of**  **Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery.** 

**AGENCY** 

### : Consumer Product Safety Commission.
**ACTION** 

### : Notice.

**SUMMARY** 

### : As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC or Commission) announces that the CPSC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for extension of approval of a collection of information relating to the generic clearance for the collection of qualitative feedback on agency service delivery (OMB No. 3041–0148). In the Federal Register of March 13, 2014 (79 FR 14237), the CPSC published a notice announcing the agency’s intent to seek an extension of approval of this collection of information. CPSC received no comments in response to that notice. Therefore, by publication of this notice, the Commission announces that CPSC has submitted to the OMB a request for extension of approval of that collection of information without change.

**DATES** 

### : Written comments on this request for extension of approval of information collection requirements should be submitted by July 7, 2014.

**ADDRESSES** 

### : Submit comments about this request by email: OIRA

_ submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202– 395–6881. Comments by mail should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the CPSC, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. In addition, written comments that are sent to OMB also should be submitted electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. CPSC–2011–0014.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : For further information contact: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### : CPSC seeks to renew the following collection of information:

Title: Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery. Abstract: The information collection activity will garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, to improve service delivery. Below we provide CPSC’s projected average estimates for activities including qualitative surveys, focus groups, customer satisfaction surveys, and usability tests.

Current Actions: Renewal of collection of information.

Type of Review: Renewal. Affected Public: Individuals and Households, Businesses and Organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government.

Average Expected Annual Number of Activities: Eight activities, including qualitative surveys, focus groups, customer satisfaction surveys, and usability tests.

Annual Number of Respondents: 1,600.

Annual Responses: 1,600. Frequency of Response: Once per request.

Average Minutes per Response: 45 minutes per response.

Annual Burden Hours: 1,200. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary,

Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–13170 Filed 6–5–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6355–01–P**



### DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
**Office of the Secretary**
**[Docket ID DoD–2013–OS–0086]**


### Proposed Collection; Comment **Request**

**AGENCY** 

### : Office of the Inspector General, DoD.

**ACTION** 

### : Notice.

**SUMMARY** 

### : In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Inspector General announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to