alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

43119

Vol. 61, No. 162

Tuesday, August 20, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 253

[Defense Acquisition Circular (DAC) 91–9]

Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement; Miscellaneous

Amendments

Correction

In rule document 95–29187 beginning

on page 61586 in the issue of Thursday,

November 30, 1995, make the following

corrections:

253.204–70 [Corrected]

1. On page 61610, in the third

column, in section 253.204–70, in

paragraph (d)(5)(iv)(C), ‘‘Code C’’ should

read ‘‘(3) Code C’’.

253.204–71 [Corrected]

2. On page 61614, in the second

column, in section 253.204–71, the

second paragraph ‘‘(f)’’ should read

‘‘(1)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 101

[Docket No. 91N-100H]

RIN 0910-AA19

Food Labeling: Health Claims and

Label Statements; Folate and Neural

Tube Defects

Correction

In rule document 96–5013 beginning

on page 8752 in the issue of Tuesday,

March 5, 1996, make the following

correction:

§101.79 [Corrected]

On page 8780, in the first column, in

§101.79(b)(3), in the fifth line, ‘‘(≤0.4

mg)’’ should read ‘‘(>0.4 mg)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 42

[A.G. Order No. 2037-96]

Equal Employment Opportunity

Correction

In rule document 96–16888 beginning

on page 34729 in the issue of

Wednesday, July 3, 1996, make the

following correction:

§42.1 [Corrected]

On page 34730, in the first column, in

§42.1(b), in the second line, ‘‘practical’’

should read ‘‘practice’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 121

Small Business Size Standards

Correction

In rule document 96–1348 beginning

on page 3280 in the issue of January 31,

1996 make the following correction:

§121.201 [Corrected]

On page 3289, in §121.201, in the

table ‘‘Size Standards by SIC Industry’’,

under the heading ‘‘Size standards in

number of employees or millions of

dollars’’, the entries corresponding to

‘‘0211 Beef Cattle Feedlots (Custom)’’

and ‘‘0252 Chicken Eggs’’ should read

respectively ‘‘$1.5’’ and ‘‘$9.0’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge and belief that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | BY: |  | /s/WILLIAM F. EVANSWilliam F. Evans Chief Financial
Officer
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Daniel FLORES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2078

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Michael McConnell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Digimarc Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



February 29,
2008

|/s/MICHAEL MCCONNELLMichael McConnell Chief Financial
Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7424

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND H. MCDONALD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-91-552, CA-00-3944-4-19)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond H. McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker

Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond H. McDonald appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in part to the Government on his motion filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here

appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order.

We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 71342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-41224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service
[INS 1938-98]


Filing for Applications and Petitions for Treaty Trader and 
Treaty Investor (E) and Alien Entrepreneur (EB-5) Classification

Correction

    In notice document 98-32237, beginning on page 67135, in the issue 
of Friday, December 4, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 67135, in the third column, in the second full paragraph, 
in the first line, ``[Insert date of publication in the Federal 
Register]'' should read ``December 4, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Label Matrix for local noticing Synchrony Bank Antonio Balestena Jr. 

 113C-0 PRA Receivables Management, LLC c/o Sahr O. Dumbar, Esq. 

 Case 20-13438-SMG PO Box 41021 1200 Brickell Ave Ste 1950 

 Southern District of Florida Norfolk, VA 23541-1021 Miami, FL 33131-3298 

 Fort Lauderdale 

 Thu Mar 19 14:51:22 EDT 2020 

 Antonio Balestena Sr Chex Systems, Inc. Comenitycap/eldorado 

 15736 SW 102nd Ln 7805 Hudson Rd PO Box 182120 

 Miami, FL 33196-5411 Saint Paul, MN 55125-1703 Columbus, OH 43218-2120 

 

 Comenitycb/el Dorado Department of Treasury Dept of Highway Safety & Motor Veh 

 Attn: Bankruptcy Dept PO Box 7345 2900 Apalachee Pkwy 

 PO Box 182125 Philadelphia, PA 19101-7345 Tallahassee, FL 32399-6552 

 Columbus, OH 43218-2125 

 Equifax Experian Florida Department of Revenue 

 PO Box 740241 PO Box 2002 PO Box 6688 

 Atlanta, GA 30374-0241 Allen, TX 75013-2002 Tallahassee, FL 32314-6688 

 Florida Department of Transportation Leaf Funding Inc. Leaf Funding, Inc. 

 605 Suwannee St c/o Donald E. Fucik, Esq. 1 Commerce Square 2005 Market St Fl 14 

 Tallahassee, FL 32399-6544 950 S Pine Island Rd Philadelphia, PA 19019 

 Plantation, FL 33324-3918 

 Merrick Bank Corp Merrick Bank/Cardworks Miami-Dade Property Tax Collector 

 PO Box 9201 Attn: Bankruptcy 140 W Flagler St 

 Old Bethpage, NY 11804-9001 PO Box 9201 Miami, FL 33130-1575 

 Old Bethpage, NY 11804-9001 

 (p)MISSION LANE LLC Nordstrom Signature Visa Nordstrom/Td Bank USA 

 PO BOX 105286 Attn: Bankruptcy 13531 E Caley Ave 

 ATLANTA GA 30348-5286 PO Box 6555 Englewood, CO 80111-6504 

 Englewood, CO 80155-6555 

 Office of the US Trustee Portfolio Recov Assoc (p)PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC 

 51 S.W. 1st Ave. 120 Corporate Blvd Ste 100 PO BOX 41067 

 Suite 1204 Norfolk, VA 23502-4952 NORFOLK VA 23541-1067 

 Miami, FL 33130-1614 

 Sahr Dumbar, Esq Transunion Wells Fargo Bank 

 1200 Brickell Ave Ste 1950 PO Box 6790 Credit 

 Miami, FL 33131-3298 Fullerton, CA 92834-9416 Bureau DISPUTE 

 Des Moines, IA 50301 

 Wells Fargo Bank NA Alberto M. Cardet Grisell Hernandez 

 Attn: Bankruptcy 1330 Coral Way #301 2646 Sherman Street 

 1 Home Campus # MAC X2303-01A Miami, FL 33145-2945 Hollywood, FL 33020-1949 

 Des Moines, IA 50328-0001 

Case 20-13438-SMG Doc 9-6 Filed 03/19/20 Page 1 of 2
 Robin R Weiner 

 www.ch13weiner.com 

 POB 559007 

 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355-9007 

 

 The preferred mailing address (p) above has been substituted for the following entity/entities as so specified 

 by said entity/entities in a Notice of Address filed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 342(f) and Fed.R.Bank.P. 2002 (g)(4). 

 Mission Lane LLC (d)Mission Lane/Tab Bank Portfolio Recovery 

 Attn: Bankruptcy Notice PO Box 105286 Attn: Bankruptcy 

 237 Kearny St # 197 Atlanta, GA 30348 120 Corporate Blvd 

 San Francisco, CA 94108-4502 Norfolk, VA 23502-4952 

 The following recipients may be/have been bypassed for notice due to an undeliverable (u) or duplicate (d) address. 

 (u)Antonio Balestena, Jr. End of Label Matrix 

 Mailable recipients 30 

 Bypassed recipients 1 

 Total 31 

Case 20-13438-SMG Doc 9-6 Filed 03/19/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Currency L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Christian AngstadtName:
Christian AngstadtTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofDemeter Management LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
August 12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 90, 98, 125-136, 170, 174, and 175

[CGD 97-042]


Offshore Supply Vessels

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-19449 beginning on page 40035 in the 
issue of Friday, July 25, 1997 make the following correction:
    On page 40035, in the third column, under SUMMARY, in the eleventh 
line ``commitments'' should read ``comments''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Technique for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in Virginia      

      January 1, 1978    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

A technique is presented for estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods in Virginia. For 299 gaged sites, the magnitudes of floods having recurrence intervals of 2 to 100 years are provided in tables. For ungaged sites, regression relations are presented that allow the estimation of flood magnitudes based on upstream drainage area, average main-channel slope, and a factor to account for regional variations in basin terrain characteristics that would bias the results. A summary of maximum known peak discharges are presented for 363 sites together with the relationship of drainage-area size to flow in cubic feet per second per square mile. Also given is table of 10 basin characteristics for 403 gaging stations.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Virginia

View All **
EXHIBIT 31.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ivan Bial, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(formerly Clamshell Enterprises, Inc.).;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2003                By:  /S/ IVAN BIAL
                                       Ivan Bial, Director, Secretary and
                                       Principle Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources inventory of Connecticut Part 1: Quinebaug River basin      

      January 1, 1966    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

The Quinebaug River basin is blessed with a relatively abundant supply of water of generally good quality which is derived from precipitation that has fallen on the basin. Annual precipitation has ranged from about 30 to 67 inches and has averaged about 45 inches over a 44-year period. Approximately 21 inches of water are returned to the atmosphere each year by evaporation and transpiration; the remainder of the annual precipitation either flows overland to streams or percolates downward to the water table and ultimately flows out of the basin in the Quinebaug River. During the autumn and winter months precipitation normally is sufficient to cause a substantial increase in the amount of water stored underground and in surface reservoirs within the basin, whereas in the summer most of the precipitation is lost through evaporation and transpiration, resulting in sharply reduced streamflow and lowered ground-water levels.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - Quinebaug River Basin
                  -  New England
                  - United States
                  - Connecticut

View All **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7858
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WESLEY BERNARD WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-198-CWH; CA-04-22859-CWH) Submitted: April 7, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wesley Bernard Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wesley Bernard Williams, a federal prisoner, seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are likewise debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials beforethe court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 216 (Monday, November 9, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 60448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-21109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 107 and 108

[Docket No. 28859; Amendment No. 107-12, 108-17]
RIN 2120-AG32


Employment History, Verification and Criminal History Records 
Check

Correction

    In rule document 98-25210 beginning on page 51204, in the issue of 
Thursday, September 24, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 51204, in the third column, in the tenth line from the 
bottom, ``that'' should read ``the''.
    2. On page 51206, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, 
in the fourth line from the bottom, ``of'' should read ``or''.


Sec.  107.31  [Corrected]

    3. On page 51218, in the third column, Sec.  107.31 (c), in the 
third line, ``competed'' should read ``completed''.
    4. On page 51219, in the third column, in Sec.  107.31 (h)(2), in 
the first line, ``not'' should read ``no''.


Sec.  108.33  [Corrected]

    5. On page 51222, in the second column, in Sec.  108.33 (j)(2), in 
the third line, ``(d)'' should read ``(a)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 10.8

 

July 15, 2015

 

Mr. Sean Rad

c/o Tinder, Inc.

8833 Sunset Blvd.

West Hollywood, CA

 

Dear Sean:

 

Reference is made to (i) that certain Funding and Governance Agreement (the “Funding and Governance Agreement”), dated as of July 28, 2014 by and among Tinder, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), IAC/InterActiveCorp, a Delaware corporation (“IAC”) and you (the “Founder”), (ii) Amendment No. 1 to the Restated Option Agreement dated July 28, 2014, by and among the Founder, the Company and IAC, dated as of July 7, 2015 (the “Rad Amendment”) and (iii) Amendment No. 1 to the Restated Option Agreement dated July 28, 2014, by and among Justin Mateen, the Company and IAC, dated as of July 7, 2015 (the “Mateen Amendment” and together with the Rad Amendment, the “Option Amendments”).

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1(d)(ii) of the Funding and Governance Agreement, with respect to the settlement of any Options held by Rad or Mateen which have been amended by the Option Amendments, IAC agrees that it shall not be permitted to contribute cash to the Company equal to the exercise price of such Options and receive Equity Securities in the Company in exchange therefor. No other rights of the parties shall be effected hereby.

 

Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by executing this letter below.

 

	
 
    	
TINDER, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Gregg Winiarski
    
	
 
    	
Title: Vice President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
IAC/INTERACTIVECORP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Gregg Winiarski
    
	
 
    	
Title: EVP &   General Counsel
    


 

Accepted and Agreed as of this

of July, 2015

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Sean Rad
    	
 
    
	
SEAN RAD
    	
 
    
	
20/07/15