alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Technique for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in Delaware      

      January 1, 1978    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

A flood-estimating method is presented which applies to drainage basins in Delaware without urban development and covers selected recurrence intervals from 2 to 100 years. The method was developed by multiple-regression techniques. The State is divided into two regions and sets of equations for calculating peak discharges based on physical basin characteristics are provided for each region. The boundary between regions generally corresponds with the division between the Piedmont and Coastal Plain provinces. In the northern region, flood-peak discharges were related to basin drainage area and storage. In the southern region, flood peaks were related to drainage area, slope, storage, forest cover, and two composite soil categories. Standard errors of estimate for the regression equations in the northern region ranged from 30 to 39 percent. For the southern region, the standard errors of estimate varied from 38 to 40 percent. Without using the two soil parameters in the southern region, the standard errors of estimate varied from 57 to 70 percent. Annual flood peaks, basin characteristics, and flood-frequency distributions are tabulated for the 60-gaged sites used in the regression analysis. At 23 of these sites, a rainfall-runoff model generated additional flood-peak data which were used in defining the flood-frequency distributions. (Woodard-USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Delaware

View All **
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 21 - 00081 - CR CYRUS LUA GRAY III , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 22nd District Court

Hays County, Texas Trial Court No . CR

- 18 - 0567 - A , Honorable R. Bruce Boyer , Presiding 

### Ju ly 7 , 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ . Appellant, Cyrus Lua Gray III , filed a notice of appeal , pro se, from the trial court’s purported denial of his “motion for exculpatory evide nce . ” 1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction
.

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West 20 1 3).2

In 2018, a ppellant was indicted for capital murder
. 2 He was a ppointed trial counsel , but his counsel was later allowed to withdraw . Proceeding pro se, appellant filed a “Motion for Exculpatory and Mitigating Evidence (Brady Material)” on October 19, 2020. The clerk’s record does not contain a trial court order ruling on appellant’s motion or a judgment of conviction. We have juris diction to consider a criminal appeal from a judgment of conviction or where expressly granted by law
. McIntosh v. State, 110 S.W.3d 51, 52 (Tex. App.
— Waco 2002, order ) (per curiam). Here, the record does not contain the purported trial court order deny ing appellant’s motion for exculpatory evidence. E ven if the trial court had signed such an order , we have found no authority granting immediate appellate review
. See Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (holding that appellate courts have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders, such as pretrial rulings, only where that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law). By letter of May 19, 2021 , we direct ed a ppellant to file a response showing how we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant filed a response but has not demonstrated grounds for continuing the appeal
. Because appellant has not presented this C ourt with a judgment of conviction or appe alable order for review , we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and deny appellant’s request for appointed appellate counsel
. Per Curiam Do not publish.

2 See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 19.03(a)(2) (West 2019 ).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10221]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 35 / Friday, February 21, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 8085]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 11499-000 Tennessee]


Armstrong Energy Resources; Notice of Public Scoping Meetings

Correction

    In notice document 97-3037 beginning on page 5812, in the issue of 
Friday, February 7, 1997 make the following correction:
    On page 5813, in the first column, in the second paragraph, in the 
first line, ``not'' should read ``now''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
OFFICE OF THE ATi’ORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

### 750

**Sanote Ml2**  **328,** 

### Act8af the46thto&i2atGre, **~~QUU ’**  **sosslon, paasod**  **by,** both houses of tha Twms togislatwo,curriQuall3n3rg3llcy clrtuso,nDdBothhouesecP the M&latum, in **pas5f.n~** the 

### Act, obsamoil tim 

### require**lZ3Dt8** in@%dbyAl%.3,S=r 30 

### , of ourConstitution,regmllng the paoaagaof cme~gency xzmsuros. The Ad, the-a

### s~~,~bocrma

OffaetAYo

as a laa on iiay

1, lDm, tho date 

### uponwhieh

ltaw al)pr#odby

thoGovmoroP t&q Stat% of. Texarn*h&,b~I&l¶har qu~2%Mf%ltOWtos **suchrOfMc8r=**

f op t h a l x a l me

o ft h a

t a m O ft he

l o f Mco *

### -pf;Lshed imruroct1y by bls 

### reeignu- fian vith the iatention that his WIO

### eeesor shall cqt his ,vot.o

forhlt3.e
Certificate Number: 12433-FLS-DE-035404439

Bankruptcy Case Number: 20-23587

12433-FLS-DE-035404439

CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION

I CERTIFY that on February 26, 2021, at 12:35 o'clock PM EST, Esther L.

Barahona completed a course on personal financial management given by internet

by Solid Start Financial Education Services, LLC, a provider approved pursuant

to 11 U.S.C. 111 to provide an instructional course concerning personal financial

management in the Southern District of Florida.

Date: February 26, 2021 By: /s/Lance Brechbill

Name: Lance Brechbill

Title: Teacher

Case 20-23587-LMI Doc 23 Filed 02/26/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VOICE STREAM
WIRELESS CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,107,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  382,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                    58,664
<INVENTORY>                                    232,033
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,731,209
<PP&E>                                       3,038,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                 541,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,429,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          872,515
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,400,963
<COMMON>                                    10,224,619
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,337,777)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,429,653
<SALES>                                        177,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,272,797
<CGS>                                          317,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,163,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               384,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                75,548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             343,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,274,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,274,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,274,879
<EPS-BASIC>                                     7.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.21


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 72823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-22727]



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 245 / Friday, December 21, 2007 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 72823]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0214; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-224-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model 717-200 
Airplanes

Correction

    In proposed rule, document E7-22727 beginning on page 65478 in the 
issue of Wednesday, November 21, 2007, make the following correction:


Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 65480, in Sec.  39.13, in the second column, in the third 
line, ``appropriate'' should read ``appropriate action''.

[FR Doc. Z7-22727 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE EX REL. Raymond ALEXANDER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0996

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claims are not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 2009-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Relator has now fully litigated an application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-110425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 94-NM-97-AD; Amendment 39-9157; AD 95-04-05]


Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier (Formerly Canadair) Model 
CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100) Series Airplanes

Correction

    In rule document 95-4256 beginning on page 12666, in the issue of 
Wednesday, March 8, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 39.13  [Corrected]

    1.On page 12667, in the third column, in Sec. 39.13 (k), in the 
first full paragraph, in the first line, before the word ``This'' 
insert ``paragraph designation (k)''.
    2.On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in 
the second line, ``April 17, 1995.'' should read ``April 7, 1995.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit
      14.1




**XIOM
      Corp.**





**CODE
      OF ETHICS**


**FOR**


**DIRECTORS,
      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CHIEFACCOUNTING OFFICER OR
      CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING**


**SIMILAR
      FUNCTIONS**





*GENERAL
      PHILOSOPHY*




The
      honesty, integrity and sound judgment of XIOM Corp.’s (“XIOM” or the “Company”)
      Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller and persons
      performing similar functions (collectively the “Principal Officers”) is
      fundamental to our reputation and success. The professional and ethical conduct
      of the Principal Officers is essential to the proper functioning and success
      of
      XIOM.





*APPLICABILITY*




This
      Code
      of Ethics shall apply to XIOM’s Directors and Principal Officers.





*STANDARDS
      OF CONDUCT*




To
      the
      best of their knowledge and ability, the Directors and Principal Officers
      shall:





o
            act
                with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of actual
                or
                apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional
                relationships;


o
            provide
                full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports
                and
                documents that XIOM files with, or submits to, the Securities and
                Exchange
                Commission (“Commission”) and in other public communications made by
                XIOM;


o
            comply
                with applicable governmental laws, rules and
                regulations;


o
            promote
                the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code of Ethics
                to
                XIOM's board of directors and outside legal
                counsel;


o
            respect
                the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
                employment;


o
            maintain
                the skills necessary and relevant to XIOM's needs;
                and


o
            proactively
                promote ethical and honest behavior among employees of XIOM and its
                subsidiaries.





All
      Directors and Principal Officers are expected to adhere to the XIOM Code of
      Ethics. Any violation of this Code of Ethics will be subject to appropriate
      discipline, up to and including dismissal from the Company and prosecution
      under
      the law. The Board of Directors shall have responsibility for administration
      of
      this Code of Ethics and shall have the sole and absolute discretionary authority
      to approve any deviation or waiver from this Code of Ethics for Directors and
      Principal Officers. In the event that a waiver of, modification of and/or change
      to this Code of Ethics is approved and granted, then the notice of the waiver,
      modification, and/or change shall be disclosed as may be required by SEC rules
      or the rules of any exchange on which the securities of the Company are then
      trading.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40667 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL J. FRISCHENMEYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CASSANDRA WOOD ET. AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CV-964

- - - - - - - - - - July 14, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael J. Frischenmeyer, Texas prisoner no. 698940, appeals the magistrate judge’s order dismissing, as frivolous, his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985 prisoner civil rights suit. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Frischenmeyer v. Wood , 6:97-CV-964 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 1998).
AFFIRMED.
### The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge 1 

### for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 95-3178

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. James Robert Voigtsberger, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 29, 1996 Filed: March 5, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
James Rob ert Voigtsberger pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud for fraudulently inducing three victims to purchase stock in a compan y supposedly building a hotel in Morton, Minnesota. Voigtsberger now appeal s his twen ty four-month prison sentence, arguing that the district court 1 erred by departing upward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, p.s., and by assessing an abuse-of-trust enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. We affirm.
Section 4 A1.3 permits an upward departure if a defendant's criminal history category underrepresents the likelihood he will commit futur e crimes
. The district court imposed this departure because Voigtsberge r com mitted the instant offense while awaiting trial and sentencing for a subst antially similar scheme in which Voigtsberger was convicted o f fraudulently soliciting investments

### -2-

to construct a hotel in Morton, and because Voig tsberger's post-conviction contact with one of the victims demonstrated that he does not appreciate the c riminality of his fraudulent conduct. We agree with the distric t court tha t these factors justify an upward departure under § 4A1.3. W e also conclude that the resulting sentence is reasonable. See United State s v. Saffeels , 39 F.3d 833, 837 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of upward departur e rev iew); United States v. Carey , 898 F.2d 642, 646 (8th Cir. 1990 ) (affirming departure from 180 months to 228 months, and noting sentence wa s well within statutory maximum).
An abuse-of-trust enhancement is app ropriate if Voigtsberger "abused
a position of . . . private trust . . . in a manner that significantl y facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense." § 3B1.3. Here , the victims were the brother of Voigtsberger's girlfriend and two of that victim's friends. They tendered money to Voigts berger for the purchase of stock in his company under circumstances, includ ing a lack of supervision, that mad e it difficult for the victims to detect wrongdoing, whic h Voigtsberger then concealed. Assuming without d eciding that the abuse-oftrust issue is not mooted by the § 4A1.3 upward departure, we conclude tha t the district court di d not err in imposing an abuse-of-trust enhancement. See Unit ed States v. Morris , 18 F.3d 562, 568 (8th Cir. 1994) (§ 3B1. 3 enhancement assessed where bank officer used position of trust to commit and conceal the offense). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Marshall BRUMMITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 17, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Vennisee v. State*, 235 So.3d 947, 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *Rogers v. State*, 223 So.3d 281, 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; *Currie v. State*, 219 So.3d 960, 960-61 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

ORFINGER, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Total-intensity magnetic anomalies of three-dimensional distributions by means of experimentally derived double layer model fields      

      January 1, 1954    

[No abstract available]

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Large-scale wildfire reduces population growth in a peripheral population of sage-grouse      

      May 10, 2021    

Drastic increases in wildfire size and frequency threaten western North American sagebrush (Artemisia L. spp.) ecosystems. At relatively large spatial scales, wildfire facilitates type conversion of sagebrush-dominated plant communities to monocultures of invasive annual grasses (e.g., Bromus tectorum L.). Annual grasses provide fine fuels that promote fire spread, contributing to a positive grass–fire feedback cycle that affects most sagebrush ecosystems, with expected habitat loss for resident wildlife populations. Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus Bonaparte, 1827) are sagebrush obligate species that are indicators of sagebrush ecosystem function because they rely on different components of sagebrush ecosystems to meet seasonal life history needs. Because wildfire cannot be predicted, chronic impacts of wildfire on sage-grouse populations have been largely limited to correlative studies. Thus, evidence from well-designed experiments is needed to understand the specific mechanisms by which wildfire is detrimental to sage-grouse population dynamics.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

August 11, 2022

####                 Greater Sage-Grouse Nest Observations Before and After Wildfire Disturbance in Northeastern California (2007-2018)              

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

#### Peter Coates, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

pcoates@usgs.gov

530-669-5073

#### Shawn T O'Neil, PhD

##### Wildlife Biologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

soneil@usgs.gov

## Related Content

August 11, 2022

####                 Greater Sage-Grouse Nest Observations Before and After Wildfire Disturbance in Northeastern California (2007-2018)              

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

#### Peter Coates, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

pcoates@usgs.gov

530-669-5073

#### Shawn T O'Neil, PhD

##### Wildlife Biologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

soneil@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california
                  -  Nevada

View All **