alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4903 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service to target 

citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under 

the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2016 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service 

to target citizens of the United States for exercising 

any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to 

the Constitution of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TARGETING BY THE INTER4 NAL REVENUE SERVICE BASED ON THE EXER5 CISE OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. 

6 None of the funds made available under any Act may 

7 be used by the Internal Revenue Service to target citizens 

8 of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4903 IH

1 under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the 

2 United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jeffery L. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4951

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 20, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Selenium in the Kootenai River Basin, Montana and Idaho, United States, and British Columbia, Canada      

      May 23, 2022    

View Report

XML Format

HTML Format

Selenium entering the 90-mile long transboundary Koocanusa Reservoir (also called Lake Koocanusa) in southeastern British Columbia, Canada, and northwestern Montana, United States, has been measured at concentrations above State and Federal water-quality and aquatic life standards. The reservoir is within the international Kootenai (or “Kootenay” in Canada) drainage basin, which contains critical habitat for native fish species and is impounded by Libby Dam 16 miles upstream from Libby, Montana. Since 1984, selenium concentrations have ranged from below detection to greater than 8 micrograms per liter in the Elk River, measured 2.2 miles above its discharge into Koocanusa Reservoir at a British Columbia environmental monitoring station (site 0200016). Selenium is a required micro-nutrient, but elevated concentrations in water bioaccumulate in egg-laying fish and birds, causing various sublethal effects and death. One possible source of selenium in the Kootenai River Basin is the excavation of bedrock in the Elk River Valley to access coal seams for metallurgical steelmaking and coal production. Five open-pit coal mines are operating in this region of southeastern British Columbia that produce about 21 million tons of metallurgical coal annually.

Site-specific selenium standards were established for the reservoir in 2020 following collaborative work by the U.S. Geological Survey, Montana Department of Environmental Quality, the British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, the Lake Koocanusa Monitoring and Research Working Group, and the Selenium Technical Subcommittee. The standards of 0.8 microgram per liter for dissolved selenium in the water column and 15.1 milligrams per kilogram dry weight for fish egg (ovary) tissue (in addition to the muscle and wholebody standards) were adopted into Montana State law in 2020 and approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2021.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           

September 23, 2019

####                 Selenium and mercury in the Kootenai River, Montana and Idaho, 2018-2019              

Idaho Water Science Center

## Related Content

September 23, 2019

####                 Selenium and mercury in the Kootenai River, Montana and Idaho, 2018-2019              

Idaho Water Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Wyoming-Montana Water Science Center - Helena Office          

3162 Bozeman AvenueHelena, MT59601United States

(406) 457-5900

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - canada
                  -  United States
                  - British Columbia
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Montana

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

CARLOS R. WEISSENBERG, Case No.: 20-17132-LMI

Debtor. Chapter 7

/

AGREED ORDER ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ATTORNEY ROBERT 

PEREDA SHOULD NOT BE SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW 

IN THIS COURT

THIS MATTER came before the Court on December 7, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. upon the Order to 

Show Cause Why Attorney Robert Pereda Should Not Be Suspended From The Practice Of Law In 

This Court (the “Show Cause Order”) (ECF #63). The United States Trustee announced a settlement 

with Mr. Pereda to address Mr. Pereda’s conduct in this case and other cases. For the reasons stated 

on the record, the Court accepts the terms of the settlement and it is ORDERED as follows:

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on December 14, 2020.

Case 20-17132-LMI Doc 86 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 3
1. Robert Pereda shall disgorge $1,000 in fees to the chapter 7 trustee for the benefit of 

the estate. The payment of $1,000 shall be made by no later than March 1, 2021. Robert Pereda

shall file a Certificate of Compliance within five (5) days of delivering the payment. 

2. Robert Pereda shall refund $500 in fees to the debtor in the case of In re Vega, Case 

No. 20-19941-LMI. The payment of $500 shall be made by no later than April 1, 2021. Robert 

Pereda shall file a Certificate of Compliance within five (5) days of delivering the payment.

3. Robert Pereda shall refund $500 in fees to the debtor in the case of In re Nunez, Case 

No. 20-20162-LMI. The payment of $500 shall be made by no later than April 1, 2021. Robert 

Pereda shall file a Certificate of Compliance within five (5) days of delivering the payment. 

4. Robert Pereda shall agree to an automatic suspension of practicing law in this District 

for a period of 30 days in the event he fails to attend a hearing before any judge in this District within

365 days of the entry of this Order. Mr. Pereda may only seek to void the suspension on the ground 

that he was physically and/or mentally incapacitated from the attending the missed hearing. 

5. For a period of 365 days from the entry of this Order, Robert Pereda shall file 

complete schedules, together with the filing of the voluntary petition, in all new chapter 7 cases filed 

in this District. 

6. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Order and 

to impose additional conditions and/or sanctions for non-compliance. 

###

Submitted by: Ariel Rodriguez, Esq.

U.S. Trustee’s Office

51 SW 1st Ave.

Miami, FL 33130

Phone: (305) 536-7285

 Fax: (305) 536-7360

ariel.rodriguez@usdoj.gov

Case 20-17132-LMI Doc 86 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 3
Copies to:

Ariel Rodriguez, Esq.

Chapter 7 Trustee

Debtor’s Counsel

Case 20-17132-LMI Doc 86 Filed 12/14/20 Page 3 of 3
Jones MARDY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 23


                                AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We have issued our report dated February 14, 2004, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements appearing in the Annual Report of SFBC International, Inc.
and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of the aforementioned report in the
Registration Statement of SFBC International, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-85270) and in the Registration Statement of SFBC
International, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-103075).


                                                 /s/ Grant Thornton LLP

                                                 Grant Thornton LLP

Miami, Florida
March 15, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Structural outer rim of Chesapeake Bay impact crater: Seismic and bore hole evidence      

      January 1, 1996    

Nine seismic-reflection profiles and four continuous core holes define the gross structural and stratigraphic framework of the outer rim of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater. The rim is manifested as a 90 km diameter ring of terraced normal-fault blocks, which forms a ∼320 m–1200 m high rim escarpment. The top of the rim escarpment is covered by a 20 m–30 m thick ejecta blanket. The escarpment encircles a flat-floored annular trough, which is partly filled with an ∼250 m thick breccia lens (Exmore breccia). The Exmore breccia overlies a 200 m–800 m thick interval of slumped sedimentary megablocks, which, in turn, rests on crystalline basement rocks. All postimpact strata (upper Eocene to Quaternary) sag structurally into the annular trough, and most units also thicken as they cross the rim into the crater. Postimpact compaction and subsidence of the Exmore breccia have created extensive normal faulting in overlying strata.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Chesapeake Bay

View All **
IC Burden Analysis Table

(XXXX) XXXX-XXXX vX

2012 Upward Bound Grantee Survey

Respondent Type # of Respondents # of Responses Hours/Response

Total Burden 

Hours Reporting Requirement

Cost per 

Repondent/

hour Total Costs

Burden by Affected Entity:

Federal Government 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

 Individuals or Households 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

 Farms 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Sub-total 0 0 0 $0

 Private Sector

 Business or other for-profits 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

 Not-for profits 100 100 2.00 200 Reporting $25.67 $5,134

Sub-total 100 100 200 $5,134

 State, Local, or Tribal Governments

 Public Institutions 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

 Private Institutions 0 0 0 0 $0 $0

Sub-total 0 0 0 0

Total 100 100 200 $5,134

CURRENT INVENTORY

Current # of Respondents 0

Current # of Responses 0

Current Inventory of Hours 0

Difference 100 100 200

Document Type

Available Electronically? Yes

Can be submitted Electronically? Yes

Percent Reporting Electronically? 100%

Obligation to Respond? Yes

Frequency? Once

Revised: XX/XX/XXXX 1
IC Burden Analysis Table

(XXXX) XXXX-XXXX vX

IC Title

Affected 

Public

Reporting 

Requirement

Available 

Electronically

Can be 

Submitted 

Electronically

Percent 

Reporting 

Electronically

Electronic 

Capability

Obligation to 

Respond

# of 

Respondents

# of 

Responses Hrs/Resp Total Hours 

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

0% 0

Total 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

CURRENT INVENTORY

Current # of Respondents

Current # of Responses

Current Inventory of Hours

Difference 0 0 #DIV/0!

Revised XX/XX/XXXX 1
IC Burden Analysis Table

(XXXX) XXXX-XXXX vX

IC Title Instrument Filename Frequency

Number of 

Respondents

Cost Per 

Respondent

Total Cost 

Per 

Respondent

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

Total Costs $0

Revised XX/XX/XXXX2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5161 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the qualifications for 

licensed mental health counselors of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2016 

Mr. MULLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the qualifications for licensed mental health counselors of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR LI4 CENSED MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELORS OF 

5 THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 Section 7402(b)(11)(A) of title 38, United States 

7 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or equivalent degree’’ after 

8 ‘‘master’s degree’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology, 1923-1924      

      January 1, 1925    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 2 Filed 03/17/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 2 Filed 03/17/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 2 Filed 03/17/20 Page 3 of 3
John Carlos CAIRO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2674

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of SmartVideo Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard E. Bennett, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 30, 2004                       By: /s/ Richard E. Bennett, Jr.
                                               ---------------------------
                                            Name:   Richard E. Bennett, Jr.
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer
HonorableCliffordB. Jones

President,Texas TechaologlcalCollege Lubbock, Texas Dear Sir: OpinionNo. O-4688 Rer Does the Texas TechnologicalCollege have the authority to pay the Lubbock Public School System for the use of their physical facilities as a laboratoryfor practice teachers. Your letter of June 30th supplemented by your letter of June llth, 1942, relativeto the above matter has been given our carefulattention.

We do not find any item in the Appropriation Bill passed by the last Legislaturein 1941 that would authorizeyou to pay the Lubbock Public Schools for the use of their physical facilitiesas a laboratory for teachers. In the absence of any sueh appropriation you could not, of course,use any of the State's fu.nd ror said purpose.

Item no. 133 of the Appropriation Bill, to which you call our attention,authorizesthe college to pay8 "Critic teaohers in Public Schools

s 700 for year endingAugust 31, 1942, and 700 for the succeeding year of the biennium." In our opinion this item in the Appropriation Bill could not be used ror the purpose ror which you now desire to use same. There is no suggestionIn saidHonorable CliffordB. Jones, Page 2 (O-4688)

item of the Appropriation Bill that it couldbe used by you to pay the Lubbock Public School for any kind of racilities. Yours very truly ATTORTJEY

GENERAL OF TEXAS By /a/ Geo. W. Sarcus

GeorgeW. Barcus Assistant Gw3:rr:lm APPRO~ AUG 28, 1942 /a/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORHEYGENERAL OF TEXAS

APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BY BWS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7427

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICKY LEE VANCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (CR-94-22-SGW; CA-05-516-SGW)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 30, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Lee Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lee Vance seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as successive his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for

reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief on his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369

(4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both

that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings

by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vance

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Vance’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims
- 3 -

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Vance’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4722 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require inclusion of the 

taxpayer’s social security number to claim the refundable portion of 

the child tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2016 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

inclusion of the taxpayer’s social security number to 

claim the refundable portion of the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED TO 

4 CLAIM THE REFUNDABLE PORTION OF THE 

5 CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(d) of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(6) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4722 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall 

2 not apply to any taxpayer for any taxable year 

3 unless the taxpayer includes the taxpayer’s so4 cial security number on the return of tax for 

5 such taxable year. 

6 ‘‘(B) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a 

7 joint return, the requirement of subparagraph 

8 (A) shall be treated as met if the social security 

9 number of either spouse is included on such re10 turn. 

11 ‘‘(C) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.—For 

12 purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘social se13 curity number’ means a social security number 

14 issued to an individual by the Social Security 

15 Administration (other than a social security 

16 number issued pursuant to subclause (II) (or 

17 that portion of subclause (III) that relates to 

18 subclause (II)) of section 205(c)(2)(B)(i) of the 

19 Social Security Act).’’. 

20 (b) OMISSIONS TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

21 CLERICAL ERROR.—Section 6213(g)(2)(I) of such Code 

22 is amended to read as follows: 

23 ‘‘(I) an omission of a correct social secu24 rity number required under section 24(d)(6) 

25 (relating to refundable portion of child tax credmstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4722 IH

1 it), or a correct TIN required under section 

2 24(e) (relating to child tax credit), to be in3 cluded on a return,’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
Berns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer


August 12, 2004
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 22, 2022

NO. 03-22-00080-CR

Ex parte Fabbian Donte Scott

APPEAL FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from an order, issued by the criminal district court of Jefferson County,

denying appellant’s application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus. Having reviewed the record, 

it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.