alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1

Entity # C7947-1999
Document Number:  20050175443-61
Date Filed: 5/11/2005 9:50:05 AM
In the Office of
Dean Heller
Secretary of State of Nevada




              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)


1.   Name of corporation: Vizario, Inc.

2.   The articles  have been amended as follows  (provide  article  numbers,  if
     available):

     FIFTH: The aggregate number of shares of capital stock of all classes which
     the corporation  shall have authority to issue is FIVE HUNDRED FIVE MILLION
     (505,000,000),  of which FIVE HUNDRED MILLION (500,000,000) shares having a
     par value of $.001 per share shall be of a class designated  "Common Stock"
     (or "Common Shares") and FIVE MILLION (5,000,000) SHARES HAVING A PAR VALUE
     OF $.001 per share  shall be of a class  designated  "Preferred  Stock" (or
     "Preferred Shares"). All shares of the Corporation shall be issued for such
     consideration or  considerations as the Board of Directors may from time to
     time determine. The designations,  voting powers, preferences,  optional or
     other special rights and  qualifications,  limitations,  or restrictions of
     the above classes of stock shall be as follows:

3.   The  vote by which  the  stockholders  holding  shares  in the  corporation
     entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
     greater  proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a
     vote by classes or series,  or as may be required by the provisions of the*
     articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 62.1%

4.   Effective date of filing (optional):

5.   Officer Signature (required): Stephen M. Siedow, President, 5/10/05
                                   ----------------------------


* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or other  right  given to any class or series of  outstanding  shares,  then the
amendment  must be approved by the vote,  in  addition to the  affirmative  vote
other required,  of the holders of shares  representing a majority of the voting
power  of  each  class  or  series  affected  by  the  amendment  regardless  of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.95 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 10.27
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK PLEDGE AGREEMENT
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
  MAD CATZ, INC.
 Pledgor
   WACHOVIA CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION (CENTRAL)
 Agent
  WHEREAS
 A.
    
    Pledgor entered into a stock pledge agreement dated as of September 25, 2000
(the Pledge Agreement) pursuant to which, inter alia, Pledgor pledged the stocks
listed on Schedule I attached thereto to Agent.B.
    
    Pledgor wishes to amend the Pledge Agreement as set out herein.
 NOW THEREFORE
 1.
    
    This First Amendment is an amendment to the Pledge Agreement. Unless the context of this
First Amendment otherwise requires, the Pledge Agreement and this First Amendment shall be
read together and shall have effect as if the provisions of the Pledge Agreement and this
First Amendment were contained in one agreement.2.
    
    The term Agreement when used in the Pledge Agreement means the Pledge Agreement as amended
by this First Amendment, together with all amendments, modifications, supplements, extensions,
renewals, restatements, replacements and novations thereof from time to time.3.
    
    Schedule I to the Pledge Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
Schedule I attached hereto.4.
    
    This First Amendment may be executed and delivered by each party in counterparts by email (in
portable document format), facsimile transmission or original signature and the




---



##### 



5.
    
    The validity, interpretation and enforcement of this First Amendment, whether in contract,
tort, equity or otherwise, shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Illinois
without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws, but excluding any rule of law that
would cause the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the Province
of Ontario.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 MAD CATZ, INC.By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Darren RichardsonTitle:By:
    
    /s/ Stewart HalpernName:Title:WACHOVIA CAPITAL FINANCE
CORPORATION (CENTRAL)By:Name:Title:By:
    
    /s/ Bruno MelloName:
    
    Bruno MelloTitle:
    
    Assistant Vice President
Wachovia Capital Finance of Canada




---



##### 



SCHEDULE I
 Pledged Stocks
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

In Re:

A & S ENTERTAINMENT, LLC Case Number 21-14020-RAM

dba The Office Chapter 11

Debtor.

_________________________/

ORDER SUSTAINING THE DEBTOR-INPOSSESSION’S OBJECTIONS TO CLAIMS #7 THROUGH #9 

THIS MATTER came before the Court without a hearing upon the filing of the 

Debtor-In-Possession’s Objections to Claims #7 through #9 filed on September 24, 2021

[ECF #88]. No written responses contesting these Objections have been received and 

the Court having reviewed the Objections and noting that the time for filing a Response 

has passed, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 29, 2021.

Case 21-14020-RAM Doc 112 Filed 11/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The Debtor-In-Possession’s Objection to Claim #7 of Christopher Nealy is 

SUSTAINED. The claimant has relief from the automatic stay to pursue any 

claim it may have against the insurance company, but shall have no claim in 

this Bankruptcy case. Claim #7 is DISALLOWED.

2. The Debtor-In-Possession’s Objection to Claim #8 of Allen Pinder is 

SUSTAINED. The claimant has relief from the automatic stay to pursue any 

claim it may have against the insurance company, but shall have no claim in 

this Bankruptcy case. Claim #8 is DISALLOWED.

3. The Debtor-In-Possession’s Objection to Claim #9 of Guy Benoit is 

SUSTAINED. Claim #9 is entitled to treatment as a late filed Proof of Claim.

###

Submitted by:

John A. Moffa, Esq.

FBN 0932760

Moffa & Bierman

380 E Commercial Blvd.

Suite 204

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308

Email: john@moffa.law

Phone: 954-634-4733

Cc: John Moffa shall serve a copy of the signed order on all parties entitled to service 

thereof and file with the court a certificate of service.

Case 21-14020-RAM Doc 112 Filed 11/01/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SehngdaTech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xiangzhi Chen, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the best of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Report:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




*/s/
                Xiangzhi Chen*Xiangzhi
                Chen*President,
                Chief Executive Officer and*
              *Chairman
                of the Board of Directors*
              *(Principle
                Executive Officer)*




Dated:
      March 30, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ShengdaTech, Inc. and will be retained by ShengdaTech, Inc. and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Douglas W. Domenech 

Secretary of Natural Resolrces 

COMMONWEALTH o/VIRGINIA 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 

TDD (804) 698-4021 

www.deq.virginia.gov 

JUN13 201 1 

Ms. Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division (3APOO) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

David K. Paylor 

Director 

(804) 698-4000 

1-800-592-5482 

Reference: Transportation Conformity, 

Revision E 10 

Dear Ms. Esher: 

Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 of the Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting 

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan approved 

and submitted under the authority of § 10.1-1185 of the Code of Virginia and in accordance with 

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 

Implementation Plans). 

This revision consists of a regulation (9V AC5 Chapter 151) that contains the 

transportation conformity requirements for federal agencies undergoing transportation projects as 

set out in Subpart B of 40 CFR Part 93. This action incorporates federal revisions to 

transportation conformity requirements on March 24, 2010 (75 FR 14260). The regulation 

amendments were adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on December 17,2010 under 

the authority of § 10.1-1308 of the Code of Virginia. 

Enclosed are the following: 

1. A true copy of the official regulation (Revision EIO) which was published in the 

Virginia Register on January 31 , 2011 after being duly adopted by the State Air 

Pollution Control Board on December 17,2010, certified by the Office of the 

Attorney General as within the board's statutory authority on January 5, 2011, and 

thus fully enforceable under Virginia law, and submitted to the Virginia Registrar 
on behalf of the board by the Department of Environmental Quality as a true and 

accurate copy of the duly adopted regulation on January 6, 2011, providing the 

evidence required by Section 2.1(b) and (e) of Appendix V of 40 CPR Part 51. 

2. Certification of public participation activities and compliance with state 

administrative procedures. 

3. Public participation record. 

4. An electronic copy of the complete submittal. This electronic copy is an exact 

duplicate of the hard copy. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

OKP\kgs 

TEMPLA TES\sIP-REG\REGOO 

SIP\NONATTN AREAS\2011\E1O-SIP.DOC 

Enclosures
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael Schaffer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.









/s/
      Michael Schaffer
            
            /s/
      Lawrence SchafferBy:
      Michael Schaffer
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              February
      22, 2010
            
            By:
      Lawrence Schaffer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              February
      22, 2010
Exhibit 99.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Moneyflow Systems
International Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the
year ended October 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 14, 2003


                                        BY: /s/ Harold F. Schultz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            HAROLD F. SCHULTZ
                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                                            FINANCIAL OFFER
Case 21-10054-AJC Doc 44 Filed 06/04/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-10054-AJC Doc 44 Filed 06/04/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-10054-AJC Doc 44 Filed 06/04/21 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mary E. Higgins, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Herbst Gaming, Inc., a Nevada corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | March 30, 2005 |   | /s/ Mary E. Higgins                      |
|--------|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   | Mary E. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 204 (Monday, October 23, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-61023]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration

49 CFR Part 178

[Docket No. HM-169A; Amdt. Nos. 171-135, 172-143, 173-244, 174-80, 175-
53, 176-37, 177-85, 178-109]
RIN 2137-AB60


Hazardous Materials Transportation Regulations; Compatibility 
with Regulations of the International Atomic Energy Agency

Correction

    In rule document 95-22773 beginning on page 50292 in the issue of 
Thursday, September 28, 1995, make the following correction:

Sec. 178.350  [Corrected]

    On page 50336, in the second column, the section heading which 
reads``Sec. 178.350-1'' should read ``Sec. 178.350''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Tannins and terpenoids as major precursors of Suwannee River fulvic acid      

      January 1, 2004    

Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) was fractionated into 7 fractions by normal-phase chromatography on silica gel followed by reverse-phase fractionation on XAD-8 resin that produced 18 subfractions. Selected major subfractions were characterized by 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared spectrometry, and elemental analyses. 13C-NMR spectra of the subfractions were more indicative of precursor structures than unfractionated SRFA, and gave spectral profiles that indicated SRFA mass was about equally split between tannin precursors and terpenoid precursors. Lignin precursors were minor components. Synthesis of 13C-NMR data with elemental data for subfractions derived from both tannin and terpenoid precursors revealed high ring contents and low numbers of carbon per rings which is indicative of fused ring structures that are extensively substituted with carboxyl and methyl groups. These results ruled out extended chain structures for SRFA. This information is useful for determining sources and properties of fulvic acid in drinking water supplies as tannins are more reactive with chlorine to produce undesirable disinfection by-products than are terpenoids.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States
STATE EX REL. Dale Shonne SQUARE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0739

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Utah and Landsat      

      April 26, 2022    

XML Format

HTML Format

View Report

Version History

Utah’s list of notable features runs long, but scenery rises to the top. The Colorado River does not simply run through southeastern Utah; it meanders through steep canyons of the eroded sedimentary rock that colors the sweeping vistas of the Colorado Plateau. Stone arches, spires, hoodoos, cliffs, and bridges in hues of red enchant residents and tourists. Mountain ranges extending through the State add dynamic views—and skiing opportunities.

The Great Salt Lake in northern Utah is the largest saltwater lake in the Western Hemisphere. The western part of Utah, including the Great Salt Lake, lies in the Great Basin, a multi-State drainage area with no outlet. Because the lake has no outlet to flush out any salt, evaporation produces a higher concentration of salts in the water or soils, called salinity. The lake lacks fish but supports algae and brine shrimp, and extensive wetlands around the lake attract millions of migratory birds.

Landsat imagery is useful for showing surface changes, such as the fluctuating water levels of the shallow Great Salt Lake. The lake flooded in the 1980s, but the southern part dropped to its lowest level in recorded history in 2021. Landsat data also can take a much deeper look at land and water conditions. Here are several ways Landsat benefits Utah.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - Information Systems
                  - Maps and Mapping
                  -  Utah Lake
                  - Benefits of Landsat
                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 134 (Thursday, July 11, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 36608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 111

[CGD 94-108]
RIN 2115-AF24

Electrical Engineering Requirements for Merchant Vessels

Correction

    In rule document 96-16318 appearing on page 33045, in the issue of 
Wednesday, June 26, 1996, make the following correction:

Sec. 111.87-3  [Corrected]

    On page 33045, in the third column, in Sec. 111.87-3, in amendatory 
instruction 20., in the last line, ``Sec. 100.20-1'' should read 
``Sec. 110.20-1''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-5022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JASON OLSON BETHEA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CR-04-95) Submitted: March 25, 2005 Decided: April 8, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan L. Saunders, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Michael J. Elston, Eric M. Hurt, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jason Olson Bethea pled guilty to one count of escape from custody in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a) (2000). At sentencing, the district court granted the Government’s motion and imposed an upward departure and sentenced Bethea to five years’ imprisonment, the statutory maximum for the offense. The court, after considering the guidelines and the factors under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2004), stated that even if the guidelines were not mandatory, it would impose the same sentence. On appeal, Bethea cites United States v Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), and Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), for the proposition that the court erred in imposing a sentence under the sentencing guidelines. Bethea further argues the upward enhancement was improper. We affirm. Because the district court’s alternate sentence was based upon the guidelines and the factors under § 3553(a) and was not greater than the statutory maximum, we find the upward departure and the five year sentence to be harmless error. We further find the sentence reasonable. Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 764-67 (Breyer, J., opinion of the Court). Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.- 3 - AFFIRMED