alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - (-)colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Research        October 3, 2022        Planetary Volatiles: Snow and Ice

Project        November 5, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Monitoring Study

Project        July 15, 2015        Precipitation and Streamgage Flood Warning System
Case 20-22409-PDR Doc 21 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-22409-PDR Doc 21 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-22409-PDR Doc 21 Filed 12/10/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION**

          In connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John J. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the   requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report   fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods   indicated. |

          This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| Date:  November 14, 2005 | /s/ John J.   Sims |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|
|                          |                    |  |
|                          | Name:              | John J. Sims |
|                          | Title:             | Chief Executive Officer |
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Using channel geometry to estimate flood flow at ungaged sites in Idaho      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

View Plate

Measurements at bankfull stage were made at 136 sites to determine whether predictions of flood discharges using channel-geometry characteristics are as good as or better than predictions using basin characteristics. These measurements are used to determine the variables of bankfull width, area, depth, and velocity. These variables are combined with basin characteristics for the sites, and multiple-regression techniques are used to select the best combination of variables to estimate the selected floods. 

Generally, discharge estimates obtained from equations using channel characteristics have smaller standard errors than those using basin characteristics, and equations using both basin and channel characteristics have even lower standard errors. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho

View All **
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40942 Conference Calendar

__________________ CLEMMIE R. WICKWARE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL., Defendants, WILLIAM WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-92-CV-129

- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * On February 29, 1996, this court barred filings by Clemmie Wickware except with judicial permission. Wickware v. Collins , No. 95-40641, slip op. at 2 (5th Cir. Feb. 29, 1996) (unpublished). One day earlier, Wickware filed the instant motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis(IFP) and for the production of a transcript at government expense in an unrelatedNo. 95-40942 -2- appeal. We consider these motions because they were filed before the bar was imposed. Our review of the motions and the record reveals that Wickware has failed to meet the requirements for IFP and for a transcript. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); Harvey v. Andrist , 754 F.2d 569, 571 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 471 U.S. 1126 (1985). The appeal is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Wickware is reminded that this court’s previously announced bar remains in effect and that he must seek permission from a judge to make any filings in any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. MOTIONS FOR IFP AND A TRANSCRIPT DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Rashad FIELDS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Carlos FERNANDEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2314

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
(107 So. 516)

No. 35259.

#### MARINE BANK & TRUST CO. v. John D. SHAFFER.

(March 1, 1926.)

Appeal from *Twentieth*Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne; H. M. Wallis, Jr., Judge.

Harris Gagne, of Houma, for appellant.

Terriberry, Rice & Young, of New Orleans, for appellee.

OVERTON, J.

This is an appeal (devolutive) from an order of court, authorizing ex-ecutory process to issue. The order was issued on two of four notes secured by mortgage. A similar order was issued, at the instance of the Bank of Houma, on the two remaining notes, secured by the same mortgage, in suit entitled Bank of Houma v. Shaffer, reported in 105 So. 79, 159 La. 1. The issues are the same in the present appeal as were those in the case cited. Hence the reasons assigned in the ease cited dispose of the present case.

For the reasons assigned in the case of the Bank of Houma v. Shaffer, cited above, the judgment appealed from is affirmed; appellant to pay the costs.

O’NIELL, C. J., is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 7051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-80223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[AD-FRL-5272-1]
RIN 2060-AD-94


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 
Petroleum Refineries

Correction

    In rule document 95-20252 beginning on page 43244 in the issue of 
Friday, August 18, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 63.640  [Corrected]

    1. On page 43261, in the third column, in Sec. 63.640(h)(5)(iii), 
in the second and third lines, ``June 18, 2001'' should read ``February 
18, 2001''.


Sec. 63.642  [Corrected]

    2. On page 43267, in the first column, in Sec. 63.642(g), the 
equation should read as follows:
E<INF>A = 0.02<greek-S>EPV<INF>1 + <greek-S>EPV<INF>2 + 
0.05<greek-S>ES<INF>1 + <greek-S>ES<INF>2 + <greek-S>EGLR<INF>1C + 
<greek-S>EGLR<INF>2 + (R)<greek-S>EMV<INF>1 + <greek-S>EMV<INF>2 + 
<greek-S>EWW<INF>1C + <greek-S>EWW<INF>2


Sec. 63.652  [Corrected]

    3. On page 43283, in Sec. 63.652(j)(1)(ii), the equation should 
read as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE96.000


BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Kenneth ZINK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

LIZ ECHEVARRIA CASE NO. 21-13441-LMI

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

_______________________________/

LIMITED RESPONSE TO DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO CLAIM 4-1

Creditor, VW Credit, Inc., responds to Debtor’s Objection to Claim (Doc. No. 62) and 

states:

1. Creditor is the lienholder on the title to the following vehicle: 

2019 VOLKSWAGEN ATLAS 

VIN: 1V2YR2CA1KC559002 (“Vehicle”).

2. Creditor filed Proof of Claim 4-1 in the amount of $63,094.14, including a 

secured arrearage of $22,730.12.

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3001(f), the Claim is prima 

facie evidence of the debt.

4. The Fifth Amended Plan (Doc. No. 57) notes the Debtor’s intent to surrender the 

Vehicle. 

5. Creditor does not oppose allowing its Claim as filed with no distribution from the 

Chapter 13 Trustee; however, also with leave to amend, in the event in the event there is a 

deficiency balance remaining after the repossession and sale of the Vehicle, as specified in

Exhibit A of its Claim. See, In re Aguero, 597 B.R. 190, 192 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2018), citing, 

United States v. International Horizons, Inc. (In re International Horizons, Inc.), 751 F.2d 1213, 

1216-17 (11th Cir. 1985) (“[An] amendment to a claim is freely allowed where the purpose is to 

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 65 Filed 11/15/21 Page 1 of 3
cure a defect in the claim as originally filed, to describe the claim with greater particularity or to 

plead a new theory of recovery on the facts set forth in the original claim.”).

WHEREFORE, Creditor respectfully requests the Court allow Proof of Claim Number

4-1 as filed with leave to amend in the event of a deficiency and for such other and further relief as

the Court deems appropriate.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Creditor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by CM/ECF 

notice and first class mail this 15th day of November 2021.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Liz Echevarria

7905 E Dr #15-B

N Bay Village, FL 33141

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE 

Jose A. Blanco

Jose A. Blanco, P.A.

102 E 49th ST

Hialeah, FL 33013

Nancy K. Neidich

POB 279806

Miramar, FL 33027

Office of the US Trustee

51 S.W. 1st Ave.

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 65 Filed 11/15/21 Page 2 of 3
Suite 1204

Miami, FL 33130

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 65 Filed 11/15/21 Page 3 of 3
MEXBRIT, LLC, ETC., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CRM CONSULTING SERVICES, S.A.S., etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
CGFD10 (7/15/20)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 16, 2020

Erik P. Kimball

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−22497−EPK

Chapter: 11

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Stuart Roy Miller

3421 NW 25th Terrace

Boca Raton, FL 33434

SSN: xxx−xx−0878

ORDER SETTING SUBCHAPTER V STATUS CONFERENCE, CLAIMS

BAR DATE, AND DEADLINE FOR ELECTIONS UNDER 11 U.S.C. §1111(b)

 The above−referenced debtor has elected to proceed with this case under Subchapter V of Chapter

11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. To further the expeditious and economical resolution of this case,

it is

ORDERED:

1. Status Conference. The Honorable Erik P. Kimball will hold the status conference required by 11

U.S.C. §1188 on January 7, 2021, at 01:30 PM by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions LLC.

To participate through CourtSolutions LLC, you must make a reservation in advance no later than

3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online

at https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476. The Debtor, counsel for the Debtor, and the Subchapter V

Trustee must appear at the status conference.

Page 1 of 2

Case 20-22497-EPK Doc 6 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 2
2. Section 1188(c) Report. At least 14 days before the date of the status conference, the Debtor

must file the report required by 11 U.S.C. §1188(c), and serve that report on the Subchapter V

Trustee, the United States Trustee, and all creditors and other parties in interest.

3. Claims bar date. The deadline for entities other than governmental units to file proofs of claim

or interest is January 22, 2021.

4. Plan Deadline. The deadline to file a plan is February 11, 2021 unless the Court extends the

deadline for reasons that are attributable to circumstances for which the Debtor should not

justly be held accountable.

5. Deadline for 1111(b) election. Any secured creditor that wishes to make an election under 11

U.S.C. §1111(b) must do so no later than 14 days after the Debtor files a plan.

6. Service. The Debtor is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Subchapter V Trustee, the

United States Trustee, all creditors, and all other parties in interest, and to file a certificate of

service as required by Local Rule 2002−1(F).

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 20-22497-EPK Doc 6 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 2
http://download.djiinnovations.

com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seismotectonic analysis of the 2019–2020 Puerto Rico sequence: The value of absolute earthquake relocations in improved interpretations of active tectonics      

      December 8, 2021    

We present a new catalog of calibrated earthquake relocations from the 2019–2020 Puerto Rico earthquake sequence related to the 7 January 2020 Mw 6.4 earthquake that occurred offshore of southwest Puerto Rico at a depth of 15.9 km. Utilizing these relocated earthquakes and associated moment tensor solutions, we can delineate several distinct fault systems that were activated during the sequence and show that the Mw 6.4 mainshock may have resulted from positive changes in Coulomb stress from earlier events. Seismicity and mechanisms define (1) a west–southwest (∼260°) zone of seismicity comprised of largely sinistral strike‐slip and oblique‐slip earthquakes that mostly occurs later in the sequence and to the west of the mainshock, (2) an area of extensional faulting that includes the mainshock and occurs largely within the mainshock’s rupture area, and (3) an north–northeast (∼30°)‐striking zone of seismicity, consisting primarily of dextral strike‐slip events that occurs before and following the mainshock and generally above (shallower than) the normal‐faulting events. These linear features intersect within the Mw 6.4 mainshock’s fault plane in southwest Puerto Rico. In addition, we show that earthquake relocations for **M** 4+ normal‐faulting events, when traced along their fault planes, daylight along east–west‐trending bathymetric features offshore of southwest Puerto Rico. Correlation of these normal‐faulting events with bathymetric features suggests an active fault system that may be a contributor to previously uncharacterized seismic hazards in southwest Puerto Rico.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William L Yeck, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wyeck@usgs.gov

303-273-8648

## Related Content

#### William L Yeck, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wyeck@usgs.gov

303-273-8648

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Earthquake Hazards
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Puerto Rico

View All **
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 602
          -  [TD 9315]
          - RIN 1545-BD10

      ( print page 24678)    

### Correction

In notice document E7-7558 beginning on page 19950 in the issue of Friday, April 20, 2007, make the following correction:

On page 19954, in the table titled “Southwest Region Rate Table,” in the fourth column in the last entry, “150.00” should read “15.00”.

Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 602
          -  [TD 9315]
          - RIN 1545-BD10

### Correction

In rule document E7-4618 beginning on page 12902 in the issue of Monday, March 19, 2007, make the following correction:

§ 602.101

On page 12946, in the second column, in § 602.101(b), in the table, under the heading “Current OMB Control No.”, in the third entry, “1545-1646” should read “1545-1946”.

[FR Doc. Z7-7558 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-P

[FR Doc. Z7-4618 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE EX REL. Darrell MORGAN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0826

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his fourth application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.