alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CLAMSHELL ENTERPRISES, INC. and
Subsidiaries (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Martin Berns, President, CEO and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/Martin Berns
Martin Berns
President, CEO and Director
May 15, 2003
Colby CLIFTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2649

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

24843

Vol. 63, No. 86

Tuesday, May 5, 1998

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[Docket No. OR–1–0001; FRL–5852–3]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Plans for Designated Facilities and

Pollutants: Oregon

Correction

In rule document 97–18082,

beginning on page 36995, in the issue of

Thursday, July 10, 1997, make the

following correction:

§ 62.9505 [Corrected]

On page 36997, in the third column,

in the undesignated center heading, in

the third line ‘‘Frp,’’ should read

‘‘From’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4340-N-01]

Super Notice of Funding Availability

(SuperNOFA) for Housing and

Community Development Programs

Correction

In notice document 98–8102

beginning on page 15490 in the issue of

Tuesday, March 31, 1998, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 15587, in the first column,

in paragraph (c)(iii), in the second line

‘‘24,000’’ should read ‘‘25,000’’.

2. On the same page, in the second

column, in the first line ‘‘$250,000 per

unt’’ should read ‘‘$250.00 per unit’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40753 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ABEL VASQUEZ

- REYES, also known as Abel Lopez

- Vasquez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 41

- 1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abel Vasquez

- Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vasque z
- Reyes h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40753 Document: 00513882380 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 40753

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel ’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40753 Document: 00513882380 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
Order entered January 10 , 2020

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00542

- CV

QADREE CAMPBELL, Appellant

V.

ANGELA MARIE PECINA A/K/A ANGELA HOWELL AND GREGORY OLIVA REZ

PECINA, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004

- 01649

- 2018



### O RDER

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due by July 2, 2019. By order dated

September 25, 2019, we granted Cour t Reporter Denise Condran’s second request for an

extension of time to file the reporter’s record and ordered the record filed by October 25, 2019.

To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER the reporter’s record in this c ase to be filed within TEN

DAYS of the date of this order. We expressly CAUTION Ms. Condran that failure to comply

with this order will result in the Court taking such action as is necessary to have the reporter’s record

filed, which may include an order t hat she not sit as a court reporter until she complies.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:Honorable David Rippel

Presiding Judge

County Court at Law No. 4

Denise Condran

Official Court Reporter

County Court at Law No. 4

All parties

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                      Ending
Class            Interest        Principal         Losses            Balance
<S>               <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>
A               5982428.5      12386498.58              0       1228810858.84
CE             4682426.55             0.42              0            66246078
M1              498936.23                0              0            97416000
M2              410918.15                0              0            74040000
M3              377558.72                0              0            54558000
P               263345.58                0              0                 600
RI                      0                0              0                   0
RII                     0                0              0                   0
RIII                    0                0              0                   0


</TABLE>
Roderick MARTIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spectrum Bancorporation, Inc ("Spectrum") on Form 10K for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Deryl F. Hamann, Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| |  |                                                                        
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/DERYL F. HAMANNDeryl F. Hamann, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
Marco SOTO-NEWTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4436

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 03, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-51742; File No. SR-NASD-2005-030]

      ( print page 48802)    

### Correction

In notice document E5-2810 beginning on page 32386 in the issue of Thursday, June 2, 2005 make the following correction:

                On page 32387, in the first column, in the footnotes, the first paragraph of footnote 3 should read: “3                Currently, broker-dealers register or report branch offices or other business locations on Schedule E of the Form BD. NYSE member firms are required to submit the NYSE Branch Office Application to register a branch office with the NYSE. In addition, Connecticut, Florida, Nevada and Vermont have separate branch office forms that request similar information for firms seeking to register a branch office in those states; moreover, more than 20 states require broker-dealers to submit a “notice filing” when a firm opens or closes a branch office.”.            

[FR Doc. Z5-2810 Filed 8-18-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 7157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-50226]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 1, 25, 36, and 97

[Docket No. 28404; Notice No. 95-17]
RIN 2120-AD40


1-g Stall Speed as the Basis for Compliance with Part 25 of the 
Federal Aviation Regulations

Correction

    In proposed rule document 96-415 beginning on page 1260 in the 
issue of Thursday, January 18, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 1260, in the second column, under the heading 
Background, in the first paragraph, in the first line ``(V<SUP>2)'' 
should read ``(Vs)''.
    2. On page 1261, in the second column, in the first paragraph, the 
fifth line from the end of paragraph should read ``g stall speeds to 
obtain minimum operating speeds equivalent to the speeds that have been 
found acceptable in ''.


Sec. 25.103  [Corrected]

    3. On page 1265, in the third column, Sec. 25.103(c), in the second 
line from the bottom, ``patch'' should read ``path''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Kenneth WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 1, 2018

Kenneth Williams, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*709The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

EXHIBIT “H” 

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 23-8 Filed 06/24/21 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: 

Performance Insurance Company SPC Chapter 15 

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. Case No.: 21-12609-AJC

_________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN

MAIN PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO §§ 1515 AND 1517 OF

THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AND GRANTING RELATED RELIEF

This matter came on for hearing on _________ __, 2021 (the “Hearing”), upon the Motion 

to Compel Turnover of Funds Held at KeyBank National Association (the “Motion”) [DE __] filed 

by Kenneth Krys and Neil Dempsey (the “Foreign Representatives”), the foreign representatives

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 23-8 Filed 06/24/21 Page 2 of 3
of Performance Insurance Company SPC and its segregated portfolios1 (collectively, the 

“Debtor”). The Court has considered the Motion, the record, and arguments of counsel at the 

Hearing, and is otherwise duly informed. Accordingly, it is 

HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. KeyBank must turnover all funds held in Goldenstar Holdings Company SP’s 

accounts to the Foreign Representatives and transfer such funds to the trust account of the Foreign 

Representatives’ counsel or such other account in the United States as specified by the Foreign 

Representatives no later than five (5) business days after being served with this Order. 

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Order.

# # #

Submitted by:

Juan J. Mendoza, Esq.

SEQUOR LAW, P.A.

1001 Brickell Bay Drive, 9th Floor

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: 305-372-8282

Facsimile: 305-372-8202

E-Mail: jmendoza@sequorlaw.com

(Juan J. Mendoza shall serve a copy of this Order on all interested parties entitled to service and 

file a certificate of service thereafter)

 1

 The Debtor contains twelve segregated portfolios (i) Bottini Insurance SP; (ii) Gen 1 

Insurance Company SP; (iii) Goldenstar Holdings Company SP; (iv) Greystone Insurance SP; (v) 

Hudson York Insurance Company SP; (vi) Omega Insurance Company SP; (vii) Performance 5 

SP; (viii) Prewett Insurance Company SP; (ix) Smart Insure SP; (x) SSS Insurance SP; (xi) 

Sustainable Insurance Company SP; and (xii) Triangle RGK SP.

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 23-8 Filed 06/24/21 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Underground water in the valleys of Utah Lake and Jordan River, Utah      

      January 1, 1906    

View Document

The valleys of Utah Lake and Jordan River are situated in north-central Utah, in the extreme eastern part of the Great Basin. The lofty Wasatch Range (Pl. I), the westernmost of the Rocky Mountain system, limits the valleys on the east, and relatively low basin ranges - the Oquirrh, Lake, and East Tintic mountains - determine them on the west. The valleys trend north and south, and are almost separated by the low east-west Traverse Range, the slopes of which constitute a dam for Utah Lake, which drains through Jordan River to Great Salt Lake.

The area under consideration is the most populous and flourishing part of the State, Salt Lake City and Provo, the first and third cities in the State, and many other thriving settlements are there located. At Bingham Junction and Murray a number of smelters treat the ores from near-by mines, but agriculture is the main industry. Water for irrigation is supplied by mountain streams, and intensive farming is successfully pursued. The practice of irrigation was begun by the Mormon pioneers in 1847, and has been discussed in several publications; little attention, however, has been given to the underground water resources, and, so far as the writer is aware, they have not before been described. The present paper outlines conditions of occurrence of the subterranean waters and describes their development in the valleys of Utah Lake and Jordan River.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Jordan River
                  -  Utah Lake
                  - Utah

View All **
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 1 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 2 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 3 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 4 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 5 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 6 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 7 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 8 of 9
Case 21-17748-AJC Doc 1 Filed 08/09/21 Page 9 of 9
gfgi_ex44.htm


Exhibit 4.4









FORM OF MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


THIS MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT ('Agreement') is executed as of the 14th day of January, 2012, by and among ________ (‘Lender’) and Game Face Gaming, Inc., a Florida Corporation ('Company').


 


RECITALS


 


A. Game Face Gaming, Inc as Maker owes the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000)pursuant to that certain Promissory  Note dated February 22, 2011, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Note').


 


B. Maturity Date. Unless this Note has been converted pursuant to the terms of this Note or unless earlier accelerated by the terms of this Note, the principal amount hereof, together with all unpaid accrued interest hereon and all other fees, costs and charges, if any, shall be due and payable on the date which is earlier: (i) eight (8) months from the original date of this Note (the "Maturity Date") or, (ii) upon the closing of any offering including the sale of securities or any debt or convertible offering from which the company shall have raised the gross amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00). No payments of principal or interest are required hereunder until the Maturity Date, except as otherwise provided herein.







C. The parties hereto are desirous of entering into this Extension Agreement.


 


AGREEMENT







NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, included but not limited to, the Recitals above, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1. Maturity Date Extension.







a. The Lender and Company agree that the maturity date of the Note ('Maturity' therein), is hereby extended from January 14, 2012 to April 15, 2012.


 




  





1











  











b. The entire loan, principal, and accrued interest will become immediately due upon the closing of any offering including the sale of securities or any debt or convertible offering from which the company shall have raised the gross amount of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars  ($600,000).







2. All other provisions of the original Note remain in effect.












Game Face Gaming, Inc.


 


Name_____________________


 


Felix Elinson


 


Title: CEO


 


 


Agreed and Accepted:


 


By:_______________________


 


 


 2
L.A., Mother of M.S. and O.S., Children Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-869

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of IceWEB, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      October 15, 2010
              
              /s/Mark B. LuckyMark
      B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting
      officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Britany LANE f/k/a Brittany Hoyt, Petitioner, v. Charles HOYT, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2082

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 1, 2018

David A. Carroll, Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Caryn Van Matre, Pensacola, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Wetherell and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur; Bilbrey, J., concurs with opinion.

Bilbrey, J., concurring.

*796The motion to disqualify the trial judge raised sufficient grounds for disqualification but was untimely. *See* Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1) & (e). I therefore concur in the denial of the petition for writ of prohibition. Of course, the trial judge retains "authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative." Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i).
RED APPLE HOLLYWOOD, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellant, v. MG3 HOLLYWOOD, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; City of Hollywood and City of Hollywood Community Redevelopment Agency For The Downtown District, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,548,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,378,445
<PP&E>                                       1,694,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,493,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,556,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,915,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,493,887
<SALES>                                        165,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,021
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,492,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             35,525,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (41,182,180)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>