alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Promotora de Informaciones, S.A. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ Juan Luis Cebrián Echarri                          |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Juan Luis Cebrián Echarri                                  |
|   |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer                                        |
|   |   |                                                                  |
|   |   |                                                                  |
|   |   | /s/ Fernando Abril-Martorell                                     |
|   |   | Name: Fernando Abril-Martorell                                        |
|   |   | Title: Deputy Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer |

----
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION 

In re: BETTINA HAUSER 

 

 Case No.: 19-24646-LMI 

 Chapter 7 

Debtor(s). 

___________________________ 

SUPPLEMENTAL FEE DISCLOSURE AND CERIFICATION OF SERVICE OF ORIGINAL 

REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT ON CREDITOR 

 Counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329 and 

Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, hereby files this Supplemental Fee 

Disclosure and Certification that Reaffirmation Agreement was mailed AIS Portfolio Services, 

LC. on February 2, 2021. 

 1. The Debtor has requested and believes that the following services, which are not 

contemplated by the original fee agreement between the Debtor and the attorney for the Debtor, 

are reasonable and necessary: Request, transmittal, review, negotiate and execution of 

reaffirmation agreement with the following: BMW Bank of North America. 

2. For these services, counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., has 

received a fee of $150.00 and costs of $00.00. Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has not agreed to share 

the above – disclosed compensation with person(s) who are not members or associates of 

Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. 

3. Timothy S. Kingcade certifies that the executed reaffirmation agreement with 

BMW Bank of North America was mailed to AIS Portfolio Services, LP., 4515 N Santa Fe 

Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73118 on February 2, 2021. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent, via CM/ 

ECF, on February 2, 2021 to the Assistant United States Trustee. 

Case 19-24646-LMI Doc 76 Filed 02/02/21 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 9011-4(B) 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I 

am admitted to the Bar of the 

United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Florida 

and I am in compliance with the 

additional qualifications to 

practice in this Court set forth in 

Local Rule 2090-1(A). 

KINGCADE & GARCIA, P.A 

Counsel for the Debtor 

Kingcade Building 

1370 Coral Way ▪ Miami, Florida 33145-2960 

WWW.MIAMIBANKRUPTCY.COM

Telephone: 305-285-9100 ▪ Facsimile: 305-

285-9542 

/S/Timothy S. Kingcade_______ 

X Timothy S. Kingcade, Esq., FBN 082309 

□ Wendy Garcia, Esq., FBN 0865478 

□ Jessica L. McMaken, Esq., FBN 580163

Case 19-24646-LMI Doc 76 Filed 02/02/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 60750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11112]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 218 / Wednesday, November 12, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 60750]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-218-000]


Jersey Central Power & Light Company; Metropolitan Edison 
Company; Pennsylvania Electric Company; Notice of Filing

Correction

    In notice document 97-29191 beginning on page 59857, in the issue 
of Wednesday, November 5, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 59857, in the third column, the docket number is 
corrected to read as set forth above.
    2. On page 59857, in the third column, under the heading, insert 
the date ``October 30, 1997.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 4

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER

61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

March 12, 2015

Sean Alteri, Director

Division of Air Pollution Control Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet 500 Metro Street, 12 th Floor, Capital Plaza Tower Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40601-1957

Dear Mr. Alteri:

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency’s FY 2014 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This repor t outlines your agency’s various grant commitments and their status. Since there were no issues, your report is now finalized. This letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process requ ired by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2014 Air Planning Agreement under Cross Cutting Issues

.

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2014 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to protect and improve air quality. If you have any ques tions or comments, please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Shantel Shelmon at (404) 562-9817.

Sincerely,

Beverly H. Banister

Director Air, Pesticides a nd Toxics Management Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Asia4Sale.com, Inc., (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

January 27, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

IN RE: Case No. 21-10143-PDR 

GRATITUDE TRAINING, LLC Chapter 11 

Debtor-in-Possession,

/ 

'(%725¶69(5,),('027,2172',60,66BANKRUPTCY CASE

*5$7,78'(75$,1,1*//&3'HEWRU ́E\DQGWKURXJKXQGHUVLJQHGFRXQVHOKHUHE\

files this Verified Motion to Dismiss Bankruptcy Case, and in support thereof states as follows: 

1. Debtor filed for voluntary relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on

January 8, 2021. 

2. Debtor is in the business of providing transformational leadership trainings and

seminars. 

3. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Debtor was forced to cease conducting

trainings in-person at large convention centers, resultinJLQDGUDVWLFGHFUHDVHWR'HEWRU¶VUHYHQXHV

4. Anticipating that the pandemic will continue to last for the foreseeable future,

Debtor had begun evolving and adapting its business model into a largely virtual platform. 

5. Sales, and as a result, revenues, have not increased as Debtor would have

anticipated or hoped during the adaptation period in comparison to the amount of time and effort 

required to completely adopt a new business model and build out an online platform. 

6. For these reasons, 'HEWRU¶V3ULQFLSDOhas opted to wind-down business operations

and close the company. 

7. Debtor asserts that conversion of this case to one under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy

Case 21-10143-PDR Doc 73 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Code is not more beneficial to Creditors than dismissal because of the limited assets available for 

liquidation. 

WHEREFORE, Debtor respectfully requests this Court enter an Order dismissing its 

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case. 

Dated: March 16, 2021

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A. 

330 N Andrews Ave., Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 765-3166

Facsimile: (954) 756-7103

Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

 By: /s/ Chad Van Horn, Esq. 

Chad Van Horn, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 64500

VERIFICATION 

The undersigned, Josephine Englesson, upon oath, states that he has read the foregoing 

'HEWRU¶V 9HULILHG 0RWLRQ WR 'LVPLVV %DQNUXSWF\ &DVH and further states that the facts and 

circumstances set forth therein are true and correct.

Dated: March 16, 2021

*5$7,78'(75$,1,1*//&

 By: 

Josephine Englesson

 Its: President

Case 21-10143-PDR Doc 73 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit n°15



|KPMG Audit
A division of KPMG SA
1, cours Valmy
92923 Paris-La Défense Cedex | ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

1/2 place des Saisons
92400 Courbevoie  Paris La Défense
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-141109 on Form S-8 of Veolia Environnement of our reports dated April 12, 2013, relating to the consolidated statements of financial position of Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated cash flow statements and consolidated statements of changes in equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2012.



Paris La Défense, April 12, 2013.



|KPMG AUDIT
A division of KPMG SA | ERNST & YOUNG et Autres
|-------------------------------- | -----------------------
|                                 |                        
|Jean-Paul Vellutini              | Karine Dupré
Ivona KARBOWSKI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1650

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Dedrick FERGUSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 59627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11104]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 59627]]



GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


President's Commission on the Celebration of Women in American 
History; Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 98-28913, appearing on page 58052, in the issue 
of Thursday, October 29, 1998, in the second column, in the SUMMARY 
section, in the fifth line, ``9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Monday'' should read 
``1 p.m to 4 p.m. on Thursday''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           VISCOPLASTIC FLUID MODEL FOR DEBRIS FLOW ROUTING.      

      January 1, 1986    

This paper describes how a generalized viscoplastic fluid model, which was developed based on non-Newtonian fluid mechanics, can be successfully applied to routing a debris flow down a channel. The one-dimensional dynamic equations developed for unsteady clear-water flow can be used for debris flow routing if the flow parameters, such as the momentum (or energy) correction factor and the resistance coefficient, can be accurately evaluated. The writer's generalized viscoplastic fluid model can be used to express such flow parameters in terms of the rheological parameters for debris flow in wide channels. A preliminary analysis of the theoretical solutions reveals the importance of the flow behavior index and the so-called modified Froude number for uniformly progressive flow in snout profile modeling.

## Citation Information
Case 20-11499-SMG Doc 9 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 20-11499-SMG Doc 9 Filed 02/06/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 20-11499-SMG Doc 9 Filed 02/06/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 20-11499-SMG Doc 9 Filed 02/06/20 Page 4 of 4
Eric WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ivan MALDANADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 25, 2018]

Ivan Maldanado, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . *See**Hart v. State* , 246 So. 3d 417, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc). As we did in *Hart* , we certify conflict with *Cuevas v. State* , 241 So.3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; *Blount v. State* , 238 So.3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; *Mosier v. State* , 235 So.3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; *Alfaro v. State* , 233 So.3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; and *Burrows v. State* , 219 So.3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Warner, J. concurring with opinion.

Warner, J. concurring.

Although I adhere to my dissent in *Hart v. State* , 246 So. 3d 417, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc), I recognize that *Hart* is now the law of this district until the certified question is answered by our supreme court.
EXHIBIT 31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Mark B. Lucky, certify that:  1.       I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010;  2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.       The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)        disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  5.       The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: February 14, 2011  By: /s/ Mark B. Lucky Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Twelve-year dynamics and rainfall thresholds for alternating creep and rapid movement of the Hooskanaden landslide from integrating InSAR, pixel offset tracking, and borehole and hydrological measurements      

      October 1, 2020    

The Hooskanaden landslide is a large (~600 m wide × 1,300 m long), deep (~30 – 45 m) slide located in southwestern Oregon. Since 1958, it has had five moderate/major movements that catastrophically damaged the intersecting U.S. Highway 101, along with persistent slow wet‐season movements and a long‐term accelerating trend due to coastal erosion. Multiple remote sensing approaches, borehole measurements, and hydrological observations have been integrated to interpret the motion behaviors of the slide. Pixel offset tracking of both Sentinel‐1 and Sentinel‐2 images was carried out to reconstruct the 3‐D displacement field of the 2019 major event, and the results agree well with field measurements. A 12‐year displacement history of the landslide from 2007 to 2019 has been retrieved by incorporating offsets from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) digital elevation model (DEM) gradients and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) processing of ALOS and Sentinel‐1 images. Comparisons with daily/hourly ground precipitation reveal that the motion dynamics are predominantly controlled by intensity and temporal pattern of rainfall. A new empirical threefold rainfall threshold was therefore proposed to forecast the dates for the moderate/major movements. This threshold relies upon antecedent water‐year and previous 3‐day and daily precipitation and was able to represent observed movement periods well. Adaptation of our threshold methodology could prove useful for other large, deep landslides for which temporal forecasting has long been generally intractable. The averaged characteristic hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity were estimated as 6.6 × 10−6 m/s and 6.6 × 10−4 m2/s, respectively, based on the time lags between rainfall pulses and slide accelerations. Hydrologic modeling using these parameters helps to explain the ability of the new rainfall threshold.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William Schulz

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

wschulz@usgs.gov

303-273-8404

## Related Content

#### William Schulz

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

wschulz@usgs.gov

303-273-8404

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Hooskanaden Landslide
                  - Oregon

View All **
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-104282, 333-110121, 333-115782 and333-121261) of Trend Micro Incorporated of our report dated March 25, 2005 except as to the Potential Effect on the Company’s Results of Operations from Distribution of a Defective Virus Pattern File in April 2005, as described in Note 23 whichis as of June 10, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 20-F. 

 

/s/ ChuoAoyama PricewaterhouseCoopers 

 

Tokyo, Japan 

June 28, 2005
Sanyia S. BOOTH, Appellant, v. Carl E. BOOTH, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Antwan G. HAGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(formerly Clamshell Enterprises, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin Berns, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer


May 20, 2004