alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No: 21-11494-SMG

TERESA DECARIA Chp. 13

 Debtor(s) /

DEBTOR’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR

AMENDING CREDITOR INFORMATION

This notice is being filed in accordance with Local Rules 1007-2(B), 1009-1(C), or 1019-1(B) upon

the filing of an amendment to the debtor’s lists, schedules or statements, pursuant to Bankruptcy

Rules 1007, 1009, or 1019. I hereby certify that:

[ ] The paper filed adds a creditor(s) to the case. I have:

[ ] remitted the required fee (unless the paper is a Bankruptcy Rule 1019(5)

report).

[ ] provided the court with a supplemental matrix in the required format.

[ ] provided notice to affected parties, including service of a copy of this notice and

a copy of the § 341 or post conversion meeting notice [Local Rule 1009-1(C)].

[ ] filed an amended schedule(s) and summary of schedules.

[ ] The paper filed deletes a creditor(s) as reflected on the attached list (include

name and address of each creditor being deleted). I have:

[ ] remitted the required fee.

[ ] provided notice to affected parties.

[ ] filed an amended schedule(s) and summary of schedules.

[ ] The paper filed corrects the name and/or address of a creditor(s) as reflected on

the attached list. I have:

[ ] provided notice to affected parties, including service of a copy of this notice

and a copy of the § 341 or post conversion meeting notice [Local Rule 1009-

1(C)].

[ ] filed an amended schedule(s) or other paper.

[ ] The paper filed corrects schedule D, E or F amount(s) or classification(s). I have:

[ ] remitted the required fee.

[ ] provided notice to affected parties.

[ ] filed an amended schedule(s) and summary of schedules.

[ X ] None of the above apply. The paper filed does not require an additional fee, a

supplemental matrix, or notice to affected parties. It G does G does not require the filing of

an amended schedule and summary of schedules.

I also certify that, if required to be filed by the Bankruptcy Rules, the official form “Declaration

Concerning Debtor’s Schedules” has been signed by each debtor as required by Local Rules

1007-2(B), 1009-1(C), or 1019-1(B).

Dated: 2 /22/2021 /s/ Efrain Cortes 

 Efrain Cortes, Esq.

FBN.: 0885649

POB 590173

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33359

(954) 486-5722

Efrain@ecglawyer.com

Case 21-11494-SMG Doc 13-1 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11209]



Federal Register/Vol. 62, No. 236/Tuesday, December 9, 1997/
Corrections

[[Page 64910]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-85-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Application for 
Abandonment

Correction

    In notice document 97-30886 beginning on page 62767, in the issue 
of Tuesday, November 25, 1997, the Docket number is corrected to read 
as set forth above.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

Luven Whitehorse 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

Reg. No.: 10711-081; Quarters: Mohawk-B 

Federal Correctional Institution 

P. 0. Box 7007

Marianna, FL 32447

In Reply 

Refer To: 

AIR-3 

NU05-01 

Subject: McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility Final PSD Permit Decision 

Dear Ms. Whitehorse: 

You are receiving this letter for one of the following reasons: 

1) You provided timely written comments or oral testimony to the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of

Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit amendment for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil

Production Facility (MCU Facility), an existing oil and gas production operation that is

owned, in partnership with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, and operated by the

Resolute Natural Resources Company (Resolute); or

2) You requested notice of the final permit decision.

Enclosed please find the final permit decision, which includes the final PSD permit amendment 

and our responses to public comments, and our notice announcing the final permit decision. The 

final PSD permit amendment, our responses to public comments, and other key documents 

relevant to the final permit are also available through a link at our website, 

http://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/prevention-significant-deterioration-psd-permits-issuedregion-9, or at http://www.regulations.gov (search: EPA-R09-0AR-2014-0785). 

In accordance with 40 CFR 124.15, this permit will become effective thirty (30) days after the 

EPA has provided notice of the final decision, unless the permit is timely appealed. Pursuant to 

40 CFR 124.19, any person who commented on the proposed permit or participated in the public 

hearing on the proposed permit may appeal the decision and permit conditions to the 

Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) within 30 days after the EPA has provided notice of the 

final permit decision. Any person who failed to file comments or failed to participate in the 

public hearing on the proposed PSD permit revision may file an appeal with the EAB only 
regarding changes from the proposed to the final permit decision. 

If you have any questions about this final action, please do not hesitate to contact Shaheerah 

Kelly of the Air Permits Office at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

2
E-Yage BOWENS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vizario, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I
      Kelly Yang, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




*This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933
      or
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
      Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
      in
      such filing.*




/s/
              Kelly YangKelly
              YangChief
              Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer andPrincipal
              Accounting OfficerDate:
              February 15, 2008
DAN BENISHEK M.D. 

FIRST DISTRICT, MICHIGAN 

514 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20515-2201 

{202) 225-4 735 

WWW.BENISHEK.HOUSE.GOV 

<!Congre%5 of tbe Wniteb ~tates 

~ou.sr of 3Repre£entatibc% 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 ih St. SW 

Washington, D.C. 20050 

Dear Kevin, 

January 29, 2014 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS 

' .... -~' 

',"""1 

• •• 1 

''··. ·, 

I write to you today to inform you of a possible gap in Essential Air Service (EAS) provided to the 

community served by the Gogebic-lron County Airport (IWD} in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. It has 

come to my attention that as of February 1, 2014, IWD will lose its sole commercial carrier, Great Lakes 

Aviation, Ltd. It is my understanding that a request for proposals (RFP} has been issued for new 

commercial airline service to IWD, with a deadline of February 5, 2014. 

I know you share my concern that commercial air service for the Gogebic County community not be 

interrupted. Any gap in service could damage the passenger base in the community, making it more 

difficult for another airline to take over service. The long term loss of air service from IWD that could 

result would have a real and lasting negative effect on Northern Michigan's economy. 

Please answer the following questions to help me understand what steps are being taken to address this 

important issue: 

1. What is the Department of Transportation (DOT) doing to ensure that the community 

serviced by IWD does not lose EASon February 1? 

2. What is DOT's plan of action to continue EAS should no successful airline bids be 

submitted? 

3. The current EAS contract held by Great Lakes Aviation does not expire until May 31, 

2014. Does Great Lakes Aviation have a contractual responsibility to ensure that service 

is continued without any interruption until another airline can take over? 

I look forward to continuing to work with you to ensure that service is continued at IWD until such time 

as another carrier can take over for Great Lakes Aviation. Please contact me directly at (202)225-4735 

with any additional questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

Dan Benishek, M.D. 

Member of Congress 

PRINTED IN MICHIGAN ON MICHIGAN MADE PAPER.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 113 (Thursday, June 12, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 32151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10612]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 113 / Thursday, June 12, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 32151]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 150

[Docket No. 28149]


Proposed Final Policy on Part 150 Approval and Funding of Noise 
Mitigation Measures

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-13953 beginning on page 28816 in the 
issue of Wednesday, May 28, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1.On page 28816, in the third column, in the first full paragraph, 
in the 20th line ``measure'' should read ``measures''.
    2.On page 28817, in the second column;
     a. In the second full paragraph;
     (1). The second line ``meet'' should read ``met''.
     (2). The eighth line ``basis'' should read ``basic''.
     (3). The ninth line ``and'' should read ``land''.
     b. In the fourth line from the bottom, ``of'' should be inserted 
following ``be''.
    3.On page 28818, in the first column; remove line two, three and 
the first two words in line four.
    4.On page 28819, in the third column, second full paragraph, in the 
second line ``typing'' should read ``tying''.
    5.On page 28821, in the second column, under the first ``Issue'' 
entry, in the seventh line, ``population'' should read ``populations''.
    6.On page 28822, in the second column, under the ``Proposed Final 
Policy Statement'', in the eighth line ``edibility'' should read 
``eligiblility''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

64910

Vol. 62, No. 236

Tuesday, December 9, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP98-85-000]

Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Application for

Abandonment

Correction

In notice document 97–30886

beginning on page 62767, in the issue of

Tuesday, November 25, 1997, the

Docket number is corrected to read as

set forth above.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Advisory Circular 29-2B, Certification

of Transport Category Rotorcraft

Correction

In notice document 97–30358

appearing on page 61859 in the issue of

Wednesday, November 19, 1997, the

subject heading should read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

Summary of Precedent Opinions of the

General Counsel

Correction

In notice document 97–31329

beginning on page 63603 in the issue of

Monday, December 1, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 63604, in the 3rd column,

under the heading ‘‘VAOPGCPREC 28-

97’’ and the subheading ‘‘Held’’, the

10th line should read ‘‘Effective Date:

July 24, 1993’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                    AND
                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mezzanine Investment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2003 (the "Report"), I, Eric C. Bronk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

/s/ Eric C. Bronk
Eric C. Bronk
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 14, 2003
Julio S. CENDEJAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2005

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

Julio S. Cendejas, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Understanding grass invasion, fire severity, and Acacia koa regeneration for forest restoration in Hawaiʻi Volcanoes National Park      

      September 10, 2021    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           

September 8, 2021

####                 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park plant community and fire severity data, 2018-2020              

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center

## Related Content

September 8, 2021

####                 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park plant community and fire severity data, 2018-2020              

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center          

Crater Rim Drive, Hawai‘i Volcanoes National ParkPO Box 44Hawai‘i National Park, HI96718United States

(808) 985-6420

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Volcanoes National Park
                  - hawaii

View All **
R.R. and S.B., Appellants, v. NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF CMA, INC., Priscilla Heffield, Ron Heffield, Daniel Heffield, Christian and Missionary Alliance, Inc., et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-4148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 18, 2018

Susan W. Fox, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Orlando, Wendy S. Loquasto, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, Griffith J. Winthrop, III, of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A., Orlando, and John K. Overchuck, of Overchuck Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellants.

David J. Pascuzzi and Steven G. Schwartz, of The Schwartz Law Group, Boca Raton, for Appellees, New Life Community Church of CMA, Inc. and Ron Heffield.

Scott A. Cole and Melinda S. Thornton, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Appellee, Priscilla Heffield.

Michael R. D'Lugo, of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, The Christian and Missionary Alliance, Inc.

Michael A. Sastre and Christian M. Leger, of GrayRobinson, P.A., Miami, for Appellee, The Southeastern District of the Christian and Missionary Alliance.

No Appearance for other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

R.R. and S.B. appeal the partial summary judgment on their negligence and respondeat superior claims against the parents and employer of the alleged abuser in this child sexual abuse case. We are compelled to affirm because the claims were time-barred by the four-year statute of limitations outlined in section 95.11(3)(a), (p), Florida Statutes (1996). In reaching this conclusion,1 we align ourselves with the Second District in *D.H. ex rel. R.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.*, 217 So.3d 1072, 1077-80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), and certify conflict with *233*Doe v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc.*, 217 So.3d 85, 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), and *Drake ex rel. Fletcher v. Island Community Church, Inc.*, 462 So.2d 1142, 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We recognize that the Florida Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction to review the conflict between the holding in *D.H.* and the holdings in *Nur-Ul-Islam Academy* and *Drake*. *See**D.H. v. Adept Cmty. Servs., Inc.*, No. SC17-829, 2017 WL 4325848, at *1 (Fla. Sept. 29, 2017).

AFFIRMED and CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

TORPY, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

1

We note that even if we were to adopt Appellants' argument as to section 95.051(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2011), Appellants' negligence and respondeat superior claims were filed beyond the seven-year repose period provided for in the statute. Likewise, their alternative argument, based on section 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2010), fails because the subsection does not apply to actions that would have been time-barred on or before July 1, 2010.
# L_2004374EN.01005901.xml

| 22.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 374/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 374/59

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2214/2004

of 21 December 2004

determining the extent to which applications lodged in December 2004 for import licences under the regime provided for by tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector for the period 1 January to 31 March 2005 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 of 18 August 2003 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector (1), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences lodged for the first quarter of 2005 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences lodged for the first quarter of 2005 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full.

| (2) | The surplus to be added to the quantity available for the following period should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The surplus to be added to the quantity available for the following period should be determined,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 January to 31 March 2005 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 April to 30 June 2005, applications may be lodged pursant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 208, 19.8.2003, p. 3.

1

---

ANNEX I

| Group | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 January to 31 March 2005 |
| --- | --- |
| G2 | 100 |
| G3 | 100 |
| G4 | 100 |
| G5 | 100 |
| G6 | 100 |
| G7 | 100 |

Group

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 January to 31 March 2005

G2

100

G3

100

G4

100

G5

100

G6

100

G7

100

---

ANNEX II

| (t) |
| --- |
| Group No | Total quantity available for the period 1 April to 30 June 2005 |
| G2 | 30 847,5 |
| G3 | 4 987,5 |
| G4 | 3 000,0 |
| G5 | 6 100,0 |
| G6 | 15 000,0 |
| G7 | 5 477,3 |

(t)

Group No

Total quantity available for the period 1 April to 30 June 2005

G2

30 847,5

G3

4 987,5

G4

3 000,0

G5

6 100,0

G6

15 000,0

G7

5 477,3

---
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 31 , 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00118

- CV

SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY , Appellant

V.
THOMAS E. ROSS AND BETH F. ROSS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris Co u nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 58385

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 18, 2020 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the

court ’ s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex . R. App. P. 42.3(a) ; s ee also San Jacint o River Auth. v. Ogletree , — - S.W.3d

— - , No. 14

- 18

- 00043

- CV, 2020 WL 428913, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 28, 2020, no pet. h.). Appellant filed no response.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consis ts of Justice s Bourliot, Hassan and Poissant

.
Delio ROMANES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Environmental Infrastructure Holdings Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Michael D. Parrish, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  Michael D.
Parrish


Michael D.
Parrish


Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer





April 15,
2010