alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling earthquake rate changes in Oklahoma and Arkansas: possible signatures of induced seismicity      

      November 26, 2013    

The rate of ML≥3 earthquakes in the central and eastern United States increased beginning in 2009, particularly in Oklahoma and central Arkansas, where fluid injection has occurred. We find evidence that suggests these rate increases are man‐made by examining the rate changes in a catalog of ML≥3 earthquakes in Oklahoma, which had a low background seismicity rate before 2009, as well as rate changes in a catalog of ML≥2.2 earthquakes in central Arkansas, which had a history of earthquake swarms prior to the start of injection in 2009. In both cases, stochastic epidemic‐type aftershock sequence models and statistical tests demonstrate that the earthquake rate change is statistically significant, and both the background rate of independent earthquakes and the aftershock productivity must increase in 2009 to explain the observed increase in seismicity. This suggests that a significant change in the underlying triggering process occurred. Both parameters vary, even when comparing natural to potentially induced swarms in Arkansas, which suggests that changes in both the background rate and the aftershock productivity may provide a way to distinguish man‐made from natural earthquake rate changes. In Arkansas we also compare earthquake and injection well locations, finding that earthquakes within 6 km of an active injection well tend to occur closer together than those that occur before, after, or far from active injection. Thus, like a change in productivity, a change in interevent distance distribution may also be an indicator of induced seismicity.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Andrea Llenos

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

allenos@usgs.gov

650-439-2562

#### Andrew Michael

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

ajmichael@usgs.gov

650-439-2777

## Related Content

#### Andrea Llenos

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

allenos@usgs.gov

650-439-2562

#### Andrew Michael

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

ajmichael@usgs.gov

650-439-2777

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arkansas;Oklahoma
                  - Arkansas
                  - Oklahoma

View All **
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the filing by Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (the“Company”) of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Evrett W. Benton                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Evrett W. Benton                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Bruce J. Mackey Jr.               |   |
|   | Bruce J. Mackey Jr.                   |
|   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

            I, Charles E. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of Eye Dynamics,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
         quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of September 30, 2005.

Date: November 14, 2005

                                                     /s/ Charles E. Phillips
                                                     Charles E. Phillips
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Henry Lee CALDWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 83 (Wednesday, April 30, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 23534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 11553-000]


Lace River Hydro; Correction to Notice of Intent to Conduct 
Environmental Scoping Meetings and a Site Visit

Correction

    In notice document 97-10169, appearing on page 19319, in the issue 
of Monday, April 21, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 19319, in the third column, in the Project No. line, 
``111553-000'' should read ``11553-000''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NO. 07-00-0440-CR  

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS  

 	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS  

	AT AMARILLO  

	PANEL B  

 	DECEMBER 28, 2000

 	______________________________  

 	BRADLEY JAMES AUSTIN,  

								Appellant

 	V.  

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

								Appellee

 	_________________________________  

	 FROM THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;  

 	NO. 785429; HONORABLE DENISE COLLINS, JUDGE   

	_______________________________  

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN, and JOHNSON, JJ. 

	Bradley James Austin (appellant) pled guilty to the offense of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, namely morphine.  Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court found appellant guilty, sentenced him to six years in prison, suspended the sentence, and placed him on probation.  Subsequently, appellant’s probation was revoked and the trial court reduced his sentence to three years in prison.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.    

	Upon receiving notice from appellant’s trial counsel that he was not representing appellant on appeal, we, by opinion dated October 30, 2000, abated and remanded the cause to determine whether appellant still wished to prosecute his appeal. At the subsequent hearing, appellant informed the trial court several times that he no longer wished to prosecute his appeal.  Appellant’s representations were contained in a supplemental reporter's record which was filed on December 15, 2000.

	Although we have no motion to dismiss before us as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), Rule 2 of the same rules permits us to suspend the operation of an existing rule.  Tex. R. App. P. 2; see Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd).  Therefore, pursuant to Rule 2, and because appellant has clearly revealed his desire to forego appeal, we suspend Rule 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. 

	Having dismissed the appeal based on the appellant’s representations to the trial court, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.   In regard to appellate counsel’s motion to be removed as counsel for this appeal, we determine that the issue is moot in light of our disposition of the appeal.

								Brian Quinn

								  Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries



|                                                |  |                                             
|----------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                      |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
orIncorporation
|LaBranche & Co. LLC                             |  | New York                                    
|LaBranche Financial Services, LLC               |  | New York                                    
|LaBranche Structured Holdings, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                    
|LaBranche Structured Products LLC               |  | New York                                    
|LaBranche Structured Products Specialists, LLC  |  | New York                                    
|LABDR Services, Inc.                            |  | Delaware                                    
|LaBranche & Co. B.V.                            |  | Netherlands                                 
|LaBranche Structured Products Europe Limited    |  | United Kingdom                              
|LaBranche Structured Products Hong Kong Limited |  | Hong Kong                                   
|LaBranche Structured Products Direct, Inc.      |  | New York
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASE NO. 20-12895-BKC-PDR

CHARLES RAYFIELD RHODES, a/k/a In proceedings under Chapter 13

RAY RHODES, BROWARD DIVISION

DEBTOR.

_______________________________/

NOTICE OF CONTINUED HEARING ON DEBTOR’S MOTION TO ALLOW DEBTOR TO

CONTINUE PROSECUTION OF CAUSE ACTION AGAINST THE CITY OF HOLLYWOOD

 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the hearing to consider the Debtor’s Motion to Allow

Debtor to Continue Prosecution of Cause of Action Against the City of Hollywood (D.E. 134) is

continued to September 13, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. at the U.S. Bankruptcy Courthouse,

Room 301, 299 E Broward Blvd, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301.

"If hearings have not resumed at the courthouse, the hearing will be conducted via Zoom. 

To register for Judge Russin’s recurring Zoom meetings, register using the following link: 

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimENeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k.

Bigge & Rodriguez, PA

Attorneys for Debtor

915 Middle River Drive

Suite 401

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304

(954) 400-7322

(954) 400-5449 Fax

By: /S/ RAYSA I. RODRIGUEZ

 RAYSA I. RODRIGUEZ, ESQ

 Florida Bar No. 109381 

Case 20-12895-PDR Doc 145 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 2
Service List:

US Trustee, electronically

Robin Weiner Trustee, electronically

Kendra Breeden, Esq., electronically

Case 20-12895-PDR Doc 145 Filed 08/03/21 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Petty Officer 
           1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS CALEB A. NELSON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Petty Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Petty 
Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 86 (Monday, May 5, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 187

[Docket No. 28860; Amendment No. 187-7]
RIN 2120-AG17


Fees for Air Traffic Services for Certain Flights Through U.S.-
Controlled Airspace

Correction

    In rule document 97-6980 beginning on page 13496 in the issue of 
Thursday, March 20, 1997 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 13498, in the second column, in the 11th line, insert 
close quotes after the asterisks. And in the same column, in the second 
full paragraph, in the 14th line from the end, ``hands'' should read 
``hand,''.
    2. On page 13499, in the first column, second full paragraph in the 
first line, ``Contined'' should read ``Continued''.

Appendix B [Corrected]

    3. On page 13503, in the third column, in paragraph (e)(4), in the 
seventh line ``GATR'' is corrected to read ``GAPR''. And in the same 
column in paragraph (f)(1), in the fourth line `its'' should read 
``is''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Dexter DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gian Franco MARTINEZ, etc., Appellant, v. Juan FERNANDEZ-URIATE, Appellee.

No. 3D17-150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

Hasbun & Mendoza, PLLC, and Maribel Mendoza, for appellant.

Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle, P.A., Andy W. Acosta and Javier Perez-Abreu, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

*1251Gian Franco Martinez ("Appellant"), as personal representative of the estate of Helen Doris Fernandez (the deceased former "Wife"), appeals the lower court's December 14, 2016 order of dismissal for lack of prosecution and the trial court's determination that the Wife's counsel failed to timely move for a substitution of party in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1). On July 10, 2015, the Wife filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage and Other Relief Without Dependent or Minor Children. On October 5, 2015, the Wife passed away.

On October 10, 2016, Juan Fernandez-Uriate ("Appellee" and the former husband) filed a Notice of Lack of Prosecution. On November 16, 2016, the Wife's counsel simultaneously filed a suggestion of death and a motion for substitution of party seeking to substitute Appellant in her stead. The lower court entered its dismissal order on December 15, 2016. This appeal followed.

Appellant argues the trial court erred in dismissing the cause. We agree and reverse.

First, the lower court erred in dismissing the cause for failure to timely move for substitution. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1) provides a 90-day period for filing a motion for substitution, after a suggestion of death is *both* filed on the record and served pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516. *Feller v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.*, 240 So.3d 61, 64-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (internal citations omitted). Here, the suggestion of death and motion for substitution were filed and served on the same day, and thus the motion for substitution was filed within the applicable 90-day period. Therefore, there can be no dispute that the motion for substitution was timely filed and rule 1.260(a)(1) cannot be a basis for dismissal.

Second, the lower court erred in dismissing the cause for lack of prosecution. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) provides that after a compliant service of notice of no record activity, if "no record activity occurs within the 60 days immediately following the service of such notice, and if no stay was issued ... the action shall be dismissed." Here, record activity occurred within the 60 days immediately following the service of the Notice of Lack of Prosecution. Therefore, rule 1.420(e) cannot be a basis for dismissal.

For the foregoing reasons, the lower court's December 15, 2016 dismissal order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 251 (Monday, December 30, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 68821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-51230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 581

RIN 3206-AH55


Processing Garnishment Orders for Child Support and/or Alimony

Correction

    In rule document 96-32137, beginning on page 67378, in the issue of 
Friday, December 20, 1996, make the following correction:

Appendix A to Part 581 [Corrected]

    On page 67378, in the second column, in Appendix A to part 581, 
insert ``Department of Agriculture'' under the heading I. Departments, 
and above the entry ``Office of the Secretary''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−23836−RAM

Chapter: 13

In re:

Daniel Borbon

10022 SW 162 CT

Miami FL 33196

SSN: XXX−XX−7669

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Robert A Mark to consider the

following:

[61] Motion to Modify Plan (Re: 30 Amended Chapter 13 Plan) Filed by Debtor Daniel Borbon (Masri,

Samir)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted time for this matter is ten

minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: October 19, 2021

Time: 09:00AM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE COURTHOUSE. Attorneys

must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court

proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and

otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing.

To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItdOyvrjIvGmlCDrtlqCZrs_TzvTdyAJ0

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described document(s) on all required parties

within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the

Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio recording maintained by the

Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the official record of the hearing.

Dated: 9/24/2021 By: Samir Masri

Case 20-23836-RAM Doc 62 Filed 09/24/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.0 - CONSENT OF RADICS & CO., LLC









               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference  into the previously
filed  Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-85153  and  333-85157) of
Pulaski  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  of our report dated January 22, 2002,
included  in the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB  for the year  ended
December 31, 2001.



                                       /s/ Radics & Co., LLC
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Radics & Co., LLC



March 29, 2002
Pine Brook, New Jersey
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

53059

Vol. 62, No. 197

Friday, October 10, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection Requests

Correction

In notice document 97–25158

beginning on page 49672, in the issue of

Tuesday, September 23, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 49672, in the second column,

in the DATES section, in the last two

lines of that section, ‘‘[insert the 60th

day after publication of this notice]’’

should read ‘‘November 24, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

21 CFR Part 1310

[DEA-156P]

RIN 1117-aa43

Listed Chemicals; Proposed

Establishment of Thresholds for Iodine

and Hydrochloric Gas (Hydrogen

Chloride Gas)

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–25362

beginning on page 51072, in the issue of

Tuesday, September 30, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 51073, in the third column,

in the eighth line from the bottom, ‘‘of’’

should read ‘‘or’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2014

No. 04-14-00740-CV

Art REYNA,

Appellant

v.

Irene BALDRIDGE and Kathy Hill,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-03985

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s Brief is due January 8, 2015.

___________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WING KEI HO and KAREN YEH-HO,

Appellants,

v.

CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-479

[April 20, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Donald W. Hafele, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA015764-XXXX-MB.

Wing Kei Ho and Karen Yeh-Ho, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Heather Needelman and Michael D. Cirullo, Jr. of Goren, Cherof, Doody 

& Ezrol, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.