alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-40075; File No. SR-CBOE-98-07]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Relating to 
the Committee Responsible for Governing RAES Participation in SPX

Correction

    In notice document 98-15780 appearing on page 32668 in the issue of 
Monday, June 15, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 32688, in the third column, following the last paragraph, 
the signature line should read as set forth below:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Fourth ESA Stakeholder Workshop April 15 , 2015 8:30 a.m. to 5 :30 p.m. Rachel Carson Room at FWS, Skyline, Bldg. 7, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Bailey's Crossroads, VA AGENDA 8:30 am Workshop opens 9: 0 0 am Opening Remarks Gina Shultz (FWS) and Don Brady ( EPA ) 9:15 am Agency Update on Problem Formulations for Three ESA Pilot Chemicals: Description of the Federal Action/Opportunities for Refinement - Melissa Panger and Eric Miederhoff (EPA ) Geospatial Data for Mapping Pesticide Use Patterns – Steven Lenna rtz (EPA) Species Range Data – Keith Paul (FWS) Risk Hypothesis and Weight- of-the - Evidence Approach – Scott Hecht (N OAA) 12: 3 0 pm Lunch (not provided) 2 : 0 0 pm Agency Update on Application of the Interim Scientific Ap proaches for Three

ESA Pilot Chemicals: Aquatic Example – ( interagency) Terrestrial Example – ( interagency ) 3 : 00 – 5:00 pm Stakeholder Input & Presentations 5:00 pm Closing Remarks Cathy Tortorici (NOAA)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Species distributions models in wildlife planning: agricultural policy and wildlife management in the great plains      

      June 9, 2017    

We know economic and social policy has implications for ecosystems at large, but the consequences for a given geographic area or specific wildlife population are more difficult to conceptualize and communicate. Species distribution models, which extrapolate species-habitat relationships across ecological scales, are capable of predicting population changes in distribution and abundance in response to management and policy, and thus, are an ideal means for facilitating proactive management within a larger policy framework. To illustrate the capabilities of species distribution modeling in scenario planning for wildlife populations, we projected an existing distribution model for ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) onto a series of alternative future landscape scenarios for Nebraska, USA. Based on our scenarios, we qualitatively and quantitatively estimated the effects of agricultural policy decisions on pheasant populations across Nebraska, in specific management regions, and at wildlife management areas. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Nebraska

View All **
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS VALUATION EXPERT**

November 3, 2005

WitnessSystems, Inc.

300Colonial Center Parkway

Roswell, Georgia 30076

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Wehereby consent to the use of the name Taylor Consulting Group, Inc., toreferences to Taylor Consulting Group, Inc. and to the inclusion of andreferences to our report, or information contained therein, dated January 24,2005, prepared for Witness Systems, Inc. appearing in this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Witness Systems, Inc.

Sincerely,

Taylor ConsultingGroup, Inc.
| /s/ MICHAEL  HALLIWELL |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Michael Halliwell      |   |
| *Managing Director*    |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD 13-98-023]
RIN 2115-AE84


Regulated Navigation Area; Strait of Juan de Fuca and Adjacent 
Coastal Waters of Washington; Makah Whale Hunting

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-19423, beginning on page 39256, in the 
issue of Wednesday, July 22, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 39256, in the second column, under the heading SUMMARY, 
in the tenth line, ``of'' should read ``to''.


Sec.  165.1310  [Corrected]

    2. On page 39257, in the third column, under Sec.  165.1310, in 
paragraph (a), in the second line, ``48 deg.10-0'N,'' should read 
``48 deg.10.0'N,''.
    3. On page 39257, in the third column, under Sec. 165.1310, in 
paragraph (a), in the eighth line, ``124 deg.29.0'W'' should read 
``124 deg.29.5'W''.
    4. On page 39258, in the first column, in paragraph (d), in the 
fifth line delete the word ``is''.
    5. On page 39258, in the first column, in paragraph (d), in the 
eighth line, ``Mekah'' should read ``Makah''.
    6. On page 39258, in the first column, in paragraph (e), in the 
first line, ``Mekah'' should read ``Makah''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# Exhibit 32 

**Section 1350 CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) **

    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,        Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode), each of the undersigned officers of Ingersoll-Rand Company    Limited (theCompany), does hereby certify that:

    TheAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K)of the    Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934 and information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition andresults of operations of the Company.

    /s/ HerbertL.Henkel                 Herbert L.Henkel   Chief ExecutiveOfficer   February 26,2004

    /s/ TimothyR. McLevish         Timothy R.McLevish   Chief FinancialOfficer   February 26,2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00827-CR

Richard JUAREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR8214

Honorable Kristina Escalona, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 22, 2023

DISMISSED

In the clerk’s record for this appeal, the trial court’s certification states “this criminal case 

is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It also contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Under Rule 25.2, if the clerk’s record does not contain “a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal,” this court must dismiss this appeal. Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez 

v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 
04-23-00827-CR

- 2 -

On September 19, 2023, we notified Appellant that this appeal would be dismissed under 

Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of 

appeal was made part of the appellate record by October 19, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 

37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 

S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). To date, no response has been filed. 

Because no response has been filed that contains an amended trial court certification 

showing that Appellant has the right of appeal, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this 

appeal. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613; Daniels, 110 S.W.3d at 176. Accordingly, this appeal is 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
Gustavo LA ROSA, Appellant, v. Karen LA ROSA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3093

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.2



Amendment 2
to the Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Severance Plan


Pursuant to Article VI of the Edwards Lifesciences Corporation Severance Plan, restated effective January 1, 2013 (the “Plan”), the Corporate Vice President of Human Resources hereby amends the Plan effective January 1, 2017 as follows:


		
	1.
	Article I, Subsection (h)(1), is amended to read as follows:




		
	(h)
	“Monthly Compensation shall mean the Eligible Employee’s monthly base salary as in effect on the date that the individual’s employment as an active employee ceases.  For purposes of the preceding sentence, “monthly base compensation” shall mean:


		
	(1)
	in the case of a salaried Eligible Employee, such employee’s annual base salary divided by 12;”




		
	2.
	Article IV, Section 4.2(a) and (b, are amended to read as follows:




Section 4.2    Severance Pay for Eligible Employees.
(a)    Job Level SME3/M3 and Below.  Severance Pay for a qualifying Eligible Employee whose job level is SME3/M3 or below, as of the date the Eligible Employee’s severance benefit is calculated shall be an amount equal to:
(1)    Monthly Compensation; plus
(2)    2% of his or her Monthly Compensation multiplied by;
(3)    the number of full Months of Service which such Eligible Employee has completed as of the date of Termination.
(b)    Job Level SME4/M4 and Above.  Severance Pay for a qualifying Eligible Employee whose job level is SME4/M4 or above, as of the date the Eligible Employee’s severance benefit is calculated shall be an amount equal to:
(1)    Monthly Compensation multiplied by 1.5; plus
(2)    4% of his or her Monthly Compensation multiplied by the number of full Months of Service which such Eligible Employee has completed as of the date of Termination.
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION


	
		
	By:
	/s/  Christine Z. McCauley

	Name:
	Christine Z. McCauley

	Title:
	Chairperson, Administrative and Investment Committee

	Date:
	April 26, 2017












WEST\276305725.1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of 724 Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John J. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section   13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                            
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

|Date:  November 11, 2004 | /s/ JOHN J. SIMS                 
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------
|                         |                                  
|                         | Name:  John J. Sims              
|                         | Title:    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
31.2




Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002




I, Mark
B. Lucky, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended June 30,
2010;




2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;




3.
     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
     The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and
have:




(a)        designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;




(b)        evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)        disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting.




5.
     The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a)        all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b)        any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
August 16, 2010




By:
              /s/
      Mark B. LuckyMark
      B. Lucky,Chief
      Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
Exhibit 16  Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant

                             Kurt D. Saliger, C.P.A.
                                Las Vegas, Nevada

                                  July 27, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: OTC Dreamwerks, Inc.
File No.: 0-33177

Dear Sir or Madam:

     I have read Item 8 of the Form 10K-SB of OTC Dreamwerks, Inc. dated July
27, 2003 and agree with the statements relating only to Kurt D. Saliger, C.P.A.,
contained therein.

/s/Kurt D. Saliger, C.P.A.
-------------------------
Kurt D. Saliger, C.P.A.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Wyoming Basin Ecoregion: Chapter 25 in *Status and trends of land change in the Western United States--1973 to 2000*

      December 1, 2012    

View Document

The Wyoming Basin Ecoregion (Omernik 1987; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999) covers approximately 128,914 km2 (49,774 mi2) in Wyoming and parts of northwestern Colorado, northeastern Utah, southeastern Idaho, and southern Montana (fig. 1). The ecoregion is bounded on the east by the Northwestern Great Plains Ecoregion; on the south and east by the Southern Rockies Ecoregion; on the south by the Colorado Plateaus Ecoregion; on the south and west by the Wasatch and Uinta Mountains Ecoregion; and on the north by the Middle Rockies Ecoregion and parts of the Montana Valley and Foothill Prairies Ecoregion (fig. 1). The ecoregion generally consists of broad intermountain basins dominated by arid grasslands and shrublands, as well as isolated hills and low mountains that merge to the south into a dissected plateau.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

## Related Content

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado;Idaho;Montana;Utah;Wyoming
                  - Colorado
                  - Idaho
                  - Montana
                  - Utah
                  - Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center — 2021 Annual Report      

      June 21, 2022    

View Report

The 2021 annual report of the U.S. Geological Survey Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center highlights accomplishments of 2021, includes a list of 2021 publications, and summarizes the work of the center, as well as the work of each of its science groups. This product allows readers to gain a general understanding of the focus areas of the center’s scientific research and learn more about specific projects and progress made throughout 2021, all while enjoying photographs taken in various environments and laboratories, and applicable maps and figures.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Sara Ernst

##### Information Specialist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

sernst@usgs.gov

508-457-2243

## Related Content

#### Sara Ernst

##### Information Specialist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

sernst@usgs.gov

508-457-2243

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Capabilities
                  - Climate
                  - Coasts
                  - Ecosystems
                  - Energy
                  - Geology
                  - Information Systems
                  - Maps and Mapping
                  - Methods and Analyses
                  - Minerals
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Ocean
                  - United States
                  - woods hole coastal and marine science center
                  - massachusetts

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 223 (Thursday, November 19, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-81119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-40577, File No. SR-PSE-97-02]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving a Proposed Rule 
Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to 
Amendments 1 and 2 to the Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, 
Inc., Relating to the Proprietary Hand-Held Terminal Program for Floor 
Brokers

Correction

    In notice document 98-28850, beginning on page 57721, in the issue 
of Wednesday, October 28, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 57726, in the third column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as follows:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PARK HILL CAPITAL I CORP.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Francis Mailhot, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 17, 2005

                               /s/ Francis Mailhot
                            -------------------
                                 Francis Mailhot
                            Chief Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Chapter 11 Cases 

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-13797-SMG 

LPT, LLC, Case No. 21-15537-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER MARYLAND, LLC, Case No. 21-15539-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER DISTRICT OF Case No. 21-15540-SMG 

COLUMBIA, LLC, 

 (Jointly administered 21-13797-SMG) 

 / 

AGREED ORDER OVERRULING DEBTORS’ SECOND OMNIBUS 

OBJECTION TO PRIORITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE TAX CLAIMS PAID OR 

OTHERWISE SATISFIED IN FULL AS TO THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 

AND THE TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS 

 THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on June 15, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. upon the abovecaptioned Debtors’ Second Omnibus Objection to Priority and Administrative Tax Claims Paid or 

Otherwise Satisfied in Full [ECF No. 905] (“Objection”) with respect to the Claims of California’s 

Franchise Tax Board and the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. The Court, noting the 

agreement of the parties, finding that adequate and proper notice of the Objection and the Order 

Scheduling Hearing [ECF No. 907] has been given and no further notice is necessary, and finding 

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 20, 2023.

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 942 Filed 06/21/23 Page 1 of 2
that the relief is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates and creditors, and being otherwise 

fully advised in the premises, it is: 

ORDERED that the Debtors’ Objection to Claim Number 92 filed in Case No. 21-13797 

by California’s Franchise Tax Board is overruled and the Claim shall be allowed as a Priority Tax 

Claim in the amount of $1,114.78. 

 ORDERED that the Debtors’ Objection to Claim Number 13 filed in Case No. 21-15537 

by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts is overruled as moot as the Claim has been 

withdrawn by Claimant. 

ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from 

or related to the interpretation, implementation, or enforcement of the terms and provisions of this 

Order and to adjudicate, if necessary, all disputes in connection herewith. 

### 

Submitted by: 

Heather L. Harmon, Esq. 

VENABLE LLP 

Attorneys for Debtors-in-Possession 

100 Southeast Second Street, 44th Floor 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 349 2300 

Facsimile: (305) 349 2310 

hlharmon@venable.com

Copies to: 

Heather L. Harmon, Esq. 

[Attorney Harmon shall forward a conformed copy of this Order to all interested parties.] 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 942 Filed 06/21/23 Page 2 of 2