alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 9, 2006 |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |   |
|                    |   |   |
|                    |   | BY:    | /s/ DAVID B. GOULD |   |
|                    |   |   | David B. Gould |
|                    |   |   | *Chairman  of the Board and*  |
|                    |   |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

 
| Dated: May 9, 2006 |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |   |
|                    |   |   |
|                    |   | BY:    | /s/ WILLIAM F. EVANS |   |
|                    |   |   | William F. Evans |
|                    |   |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc.and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 53747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-21006]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP91-143-047]

Great Lakes Transmission Limited Partnership: Notice of Final 
Revenue Sharing Report--Past Period Changes

Correction

    In notice document 98-26106, beginning on page 52247, in the issue 
of Wednesday, September 30, 1998, the docket line is added to read as 
set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Stephen D. LEONARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6249

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

GREGORY BLANKS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief 

District Judge. (7:04-cr-00076-FL-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Blanks, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Gregory Blanks appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. 

Crim. P. 35 motion on his behalf, or for a sentence reduction 

based upon his allegedly substantial assistance. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Blanks, 

No. 7:04-cr-00076-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1628

LAURENT KONGADEMBOU, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-216-252) Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 10, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Senior Litigation Counsel, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Kongadembou does not challenge the denial of withholding under the Convention Against Torture. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Laurent Kongadembou, a native and citizen of the Central African Republic, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s findings that Kongadembou’s asylum application was untimely. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000); Zaidi v. Ashcroft , 377 F.3d 678, 680-81 (7th Cir. 2004) (collecting cases). Given this jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of Kongadembou’s asylum claim. While we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of Kongadembou’s asylum claim, we retain jurisdiction to consider the denial of his request for withholding of removal. * See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a) (2004). “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citingINS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). A trier of fact who rejects an applicant’s testimony on credibility grounds must offer specific, cogent reasons for doing so. Figeroa v. INS , 886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir.- 3 - 1989). This Court accords broad, though not unlimited, deference to credibility findings supported by substantial evidence. Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). We find the Board’s conclusion that Kongadembou was not credible to be supported by the evidence. Accordingly, Kongadembou’s challenge to the denial of his application for withholding from removal must fail. Accordingly, we deny Kongadembou’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Joseph N. ALLEN, Appellant, v. Leo J. BAKER, Jr., Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-1901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 151 (Monday, August 5, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10805]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 151 / Monday, August 5, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 40708]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Action Affecting Export Privileges; ISP International Spare Parts 
GmbH; Order

Correction

    In notice document 96-15743 beginning on page 31504 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 20, 1996, after the subject heading above, the following 
information should be inserted:
    ``In the matter of ISP International Spare Parts GmbH, Industrie 
Park, D, 14974 Ludwigsfelde, Germany, Respondent.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40411

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Victor Hugo Manilla-Tolentino, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:20-CR-440-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo 

Manilla-Tolentino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Manilla-Tolentino has not filed a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 21, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40411 Document: 00516139779 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2021
No. 21-40411

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40411 Document: 00516139779 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2021
Mr. Eldon Heaston, Executive Officer

Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

14306 Park Avenue

Victorville, CA 92392-2310

Dear Mr. Heaston:

Thank you for your timely submission ofthe 2007 Annual Monitoring Network Plan, June 28, 2007. We recognize that producing this document and the associated

public inspection process represented new requirements and we appreciate your effort to meet them. We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that it meets theminimum requirements set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at

CD (415)972-3261.

Sincere ,

Sean P. Hogan, Manager

Air Quality Analysis Office

Air Division

cc: Christopher A. Collins, MDAQMD

Larry Parks, MDAQMD

0
### SERVED: JUNE 17, 2013
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC 

### FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED]
· (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0040
HEARING NOTICE 

### ; l 

### p 2: 3LJ

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thattestimony and evidence will be heard and considered on October 28 and 29, 2013, 

### inclusive, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 14th Floor, 1100 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1496. 

### Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at4:30p.m. each day. The parties shall vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases 

### will not be removed from the docketuntil the Judge receives the proper

,pleading(s). Pleadings1 may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier orpostal service2•



### Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service List

1 Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials which are sealed) also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. For additional information see: http://dms.dot.gov. 2 TheAdministrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes ofthe decisions,the Rules ofPractice, as well as other materials relatingto civil penalty cases, are available onthe internet at: http://www.faa.gov!about/o(fice org/headquarters o(ficeslagc!pol adjudication!agc400/civil penalty/: see also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi!t!text/text-idx?c=ec(r&tpl=lecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab 02.tpl. Inaddition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishingpublishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database. For additional information, see the Web site.SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration
·800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000 1 ONE COPY 

### Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### Michael L. Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

### Agency Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 6E Fort Worth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5092 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

      ( print page 26407)    

### Correction

In notice document E6-6263 appearing on page 24757 in the issue of Wednesday, April 26, 2006, make the following correction:

In the center column, in the fourth full paragraph, in the fourth and fifth lines, “245120 years B.P.” should read “245 ± 120 years B.P.”.

Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

### Correction

In notice document E6-4351 appearing on page 15219 in the issue of Monday, March 27, 2006, make the following correction:

In the second column, in the third full paragraph, in the last line, “May 1, 2006” should read “May 26, 2006”.

[FR Doc. Z6-6263 Filed 5-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

[FR Doc. Z6-4351 Filed 5-3-06; 8:45 am]
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-123513, No. 333-134045 and No. 333-165495 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 28, 2012, relating to the financial statements of AIXTRON SE (which report expresses an unqualified opinion) and Managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of AIXTRON SE for the year ended December 31, 2011.  /s/ Deloitte & Touche GmbH   WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftDeloitte & ToucheGmbHWirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftDuesseldorf,   Germany, February 28, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10402]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 15751]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-201-002]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 97-5617 appearing on page 10550 in the issue of 
Friday, March 7, 1997 make the following correction:
    In the second column the docket number heading should read as set 
forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 3, 2005)]
[Corrections]
[Page 22999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z5-1878]



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May, 3, 2005 / 
Corrections

[[Page 22999]]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-51540; File No. SR-CBOE-2005-21]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, 
Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the 
Calculation of the National Best Bid or Offer When Another Exchange is 
Disconnected From the Intermarket Options Linkage

Correction

    In notice document E5-1878 beginning on page 20780 in the issue of 
Thursday, April 21, 2005, make the following correction:
    On page 20781, in the second column, under the heading Paper 
Comments, in the second paragraph, in the last line, ``May 21, 2005'' 
should read ``May 12, 2005''.

[FR Doc. Z5-1878 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A

Case 20-19203-RAM Doc 53-1 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 1 ›ø­a ÓðÛÔÁÓðÌÛŒfl” ‹±1⁄2 ÓÏ ⁄·¥ao ðÁÒÓÏÒÓð –ø1a Ï ±o Ï
STATE EX REL. Lee CURRY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 17-KH-0737

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Despite the caption of his pleading in the district court, to the extent that relator disputes the terms of the plea agreement and thereby contests the validity of the resulting convictions and sentences, he has presented an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *Smith v. Cajun Insulation* , 392 So.2d 398, 402 n.2 (La. 1980) ("[C]ourts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice."). Relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. In addition, his sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator *262has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5090 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5090

  To ensure that air transportation between the United States and the 
European Union complies with the intent of article 17 bis of the United 
 States-European Union-Norway-Iceland Air Transport Agreement of June 
                               21, 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2016

 Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Larsen of Washington, and 
Mr. Westmoreland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure that air transportation between the United States and the 
European Union complies with the intent of article 17 bis of the United 
 States-European Union-Norway-Iceland Air Transport Agreement of June 
                               21, 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSATLANTIC OPEN SKIES.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall not issue a foreign air 
carrier permit under section 41302 of title 49, United States Code, or 
an exemption under section 40109 of such title, to provide foreign air 
transportation under the United States-European Union-Norway-Iceland 
Air Transport Agreement of June 21, 2011 (as amended), unless the 
Secretary--
            (1) finds that issuing the permit or exemption would be 
        consistent with the intent of the parties, set forth in article 
        17 bis of such agreement, that opportunities created by the 
        agreement do not undermine labor standards or the labor-related 
        rights and principles contained in the parties' respective 
        laws; and
            (2) imposes such conditions on the permit or exemption as 
        may be necessary to ensure that the carrier's provision of 
        foreign air transportation complies with the intent of article 
        17 bis.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 488 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 488

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
    monuments in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2015

Mr. Amodei (for himself, Mr. Heck of Nevada, and Mr. Hardy) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
    monuments in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN NEVADA.

    The proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act of 
September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or Nevada'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```