alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

In re Kevin L La Chapelle

Debtor

Case No. 21-12238

(If known)

Chapter Chapter 7

1.

$1,362.00

$600.00

$762.00

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the abovenamed debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services

rendered or to be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection w ith the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received

Balance Due

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

Debtor Other (specify)

3. The source of the compensation paid to me is:

Debtor Other (specify)

4. I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are

members and associates of my law firm.

I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a other person or persons who are not

members or associates of my law firm. A copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of

the people sharing in the compensation, is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in

bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statements of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following services:

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Southern District of Florida

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the

debtor(s) in this bankruptcy proceedings.

3/8/2021

Date

/s/ Yevgeniy Feldman

Signature of Attorney

Semrad Law Firm

Name of law firm

Case 21-12238-LMI Doc 7 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-51029

 

JOE EPPERSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CV-533

- - - - - - - - - -

February 19, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Epperson, Texas prisoner # 588235, seeks a certificate

of appealability (“COA”) for an appeal from the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application as barred by

limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). COA will be granted

only if Epperson makes a substantial showing of the denial of a

federal right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the underlying

issue is not of constitutional dimension, as in this COA

application, the prisoner must first make a credible showing that

the district court erred before this court will consider whether 
No. 97-51029

- 2 -

he has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Murphy v. Johnson, 110 F.3d 10, 11

(5th Cir. 1997).

A one-year period of limitation applies to applications for

a writ of habeas corpus by persons in custody pursuant to the

judgment of a State court. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). A habeas

applicant whose claims otherwise would be time-barred because the

limitations period would have expired before the effective date

of the AEDPA had until April 24, 1997, to file his habeas

application. Flanagan v. Johnson, 154 F.3d 196, 200-02 (5th Cir.

1998). Because Epperson’s conviction became final prior to the

effective date of the AEDPA, without tolling, Epperson had until

April 24, 1997, to file his § 2254 application. Epperson’s

habeas application was filed after that date. 

Under § 2244(d)(2), the period during which an application

for state habeas corpus relief regarding the same conviction and

sentence is pending is not counted towards the one-year statutory

limitations period in § 2244(d)(1). See Fields v. Johnson, 159

F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir. 1998). Because Epperson’s state

postconviction proceeding was pending for 98 days during the year

following April 24, 1996, Epperson had 98 days past April 24,

1997, within which to file his habeas application in the district

court. His June 16, 1997, habeas application was filed within

that time. COA is GRANTED as to this issue only. 

This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of

Epperson’s unaddressed underlying habeas corpus claims. See

Whitehead v. Johnson, 157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1998). 
No. 97-51029

- 3 -

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is VACATED and the

case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Strategies for effective collaborative manuscript development in interdisciplinary science teams      

      May 8, 2018    

Science is increasingly being conducted in large, interdisciplinary teams. As team size increases, challenges can arise during manuscript development, where achieving one team goal (e.g., inclusivity) may be in direct conflict with other goals (e.g., efficiency). Here, we present strategies for effective collaborative manuscript development that draw from our experiences in an interdisciplinary science team writing collaborative manuscripts for six years. These strategies are rooted in six guiding principles that were important to our team: to create a transparent, inclusive, and accountable research team that promotes and protects team members who have less power to influence decision‐making while fostering creativity and productivity. To help alleviate the conflicts that can arise in collaborative manuscript development, we present the following strategies: understand your team composition, create an authorship policy and discuss authorship early and often, openly announce manuscript ideas, identify and communicate the type of manuscript and lead author management style, and document and describe authorship contributions. These strategies can help reduce the probability of group conflict, uphold individual and team values, achieve fair authorship practices, and increase science productivity.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Tyler Wagner, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

twagner@usgs.gov

814-865-4511

## Related Content

#### Tyler Wagner, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

twagner@usgs.gov

814-865-4511

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10527]



[[Page 29061]]
Juan Carlos ORGE, Appellant, v. Arianna GRIJALBA, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10407]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 155


Oil or Hazardous Material Pollution Prevention Regulations for 
Vessels

CFR Correction

    In Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 125 to 199, 
revised as of July 1, 1996, page 414, Table 3 in Appendix B to part 155 
is corrected by adding brackets and an asterisk around the number 5 in 
the column entitled ``% Recovered Floating oil'', under the categories 
``Offshore'' and ``6 days'' for the entry Non-persistent oils.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Kevin C. AMBLER, Esq., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DERMATOLOGY HEALTHCARE, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Asteroids

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(69)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(4)

## By Year

Center News        April 9, 2023        The paper is out: Did you know about cascading hazards from asteroid impacts?

Center News        June 28, 2022        Asteroid Day: How do you prepare for an asteroid impact?

Presentations and Events        January 26, 2017        PubTalk 1/2017 — Unusual sources of tsunamis

Featured Films and Shorts        November 26, 2018        Image of the Week - Antarctica’s Blue Ice

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Human Capital        September 19, 2018        Dave Roddy

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2009        Inside USGS, No. 3, Robert Fournier, Yellowstone

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens

Featured Films and Shorts        September 25, 2018        First mission: USGS UAS monitors gas emissions at Mount St. Helens —AD
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 1 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 2 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 3 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 3 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 4 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 4 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 5 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 5 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 6 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 6 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 7 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 7 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 8 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 8 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 9 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 9 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 10 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 10 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 11 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 11 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 12 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 12 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 13 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 13 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 14 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 14 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 15 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 15 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 19 Filed 03/04/21 Page 16 of 16 Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 16 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 17 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 18 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 19 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 20 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 21 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 22 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 23 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 24 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 25 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 26 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 27 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 28 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 29 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 30 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 31 of 32
Case 21-11540-PDR Doc 29 Filed 03/18/21 Page 32 of 32
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 31

           CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kenneth C. Lowe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Transition Auto Finance
IV (TAF IV).

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TAF IV as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. TAF IV's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for TAF IV and we have:

      a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to TAF IV, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of TAF IV's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
      internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
      supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
      financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
      external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
      principles; and

      d. Disclosed in this report any change in TAF IV's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during TAF IV's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, TAF IV's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. TAF IV's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and TAF IV's Board of Directors:

      a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect TAF IV's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for TAF IV's
      auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in TAF IV's internal controls.

Date: March 31, 2005

 /s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
-----------------------------------------------
Kenneth C. Lowe,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of IceWEB, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 30, 2010/s/ Mark B. Lucky
Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer,
principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2018

No. 04-18-00345-CR

Comfort Delando ROBERTS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR11457

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on December 31, 2018. Further requests for an extension of time in 

which to file appellant’s brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
March 17, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Office of Chief Counsel Attn: Rules Docket, AGC-10 Office of Chief Counsel 800 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, D.C. 20591 Via website: regulations.gov Re: Remove and Install Medevac Stretcher Exemption No. 6674/ Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8963 Peninsula Airways, Inc. d/b/a PenAir respectfully requests the DepartmentofTransportation (DOT) for a two-yearextension of Exemption No.6674, allowing trained PenAircrewmembers to install and/or remove medevac stretchers. Ourcurrent extension expires on August 31, 2011. The conditions that existed when this exemption was initially granted have not changed. The exemption is still in the public interestand does not reduce the level of safety required by the Federal Aviation regulations. PenAir continues to provide medevac services to remote locations that are significantly dependant on air transportation and where certified airframe mechanics are not commonly available. PenAir has trained crewmembers to properly perform the removal and installation ofthe medevac stretchers. We have been operating within this exemption without incident during this period and would like to be granted an extension with the same conditions and limitations. I look forward to hearing from you. Ifyou have anyquestions, please call me at (907) 771-2552. Sincerely, Bryan Carricaburru VP, Director of Operations

6100 Boeing Avenue. Anchorage, Alaska 99502 • (907) 771-2500. fax (907) 771-2664. www.penair.com
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5118 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to specify certain effects of 

guidelines, general statements of policy, and similar guidance issued 

by the Federal Trade Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2016 

Mr. POMPEO (for himself, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. HARPER, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, and Mr. LANCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to specify 

certain effects of guidelines, general statements of policy, 

and similar guidance issued by the Federal Trade Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Solidifying Habitual 

5 and Institutional Explanations of Liability and Defenses 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘SHIELD Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5118 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTS OF GUIDELINES, GENERAL STATEMENTS 

2 OF POLICY, AND SIMILAR GUIDANCE. 

3 Section 18(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act 

4 (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(3)(A) No guidelines, general statements of policy, 

7 or similar guidance issued by the Commission shall confer 

8 any rights upon any person, State, or locality, nor shall 

9 operate to bind the Commission or any person, State, or 

10 locality to the approach recommended in such guidelines, 

11 general statements of policy, or similar guidance. In any 

12 enforcement action, the Commission shall prove a violation 

13 of a provision of law enforced by the Commission. The 

14 Commission may not base an enforcement action on, or 

15 execute a consent order based on, acts or practices that 

16 are alleged to be inconsistent with any such guidelines, 

17 general statements of policy, or similar guidance, unless 

18 the acts or practices violate a provision of law enforced 

19 by the Commission. 

20 ‘‘(B) Compliance with any guidelines, general state21 ment of policy, or similar guidance issued by the Commis22 sion may be used as evidence of compliance with the provi23 sion of law under which the guidelines, general statement 

24 of policy, or guidance was issued. 

25 ‘‘(C) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to 

26 confer any authority upon or negate any authority of the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5118 IH

1 Commission to issue guidelines, general statements of pol2 icy, or similar guidance.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS