alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

3916 

Vol. 72, No. 17 

Friday, January 26, 2007 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service 

7 CFR Part 301 

[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0151] 

Oriental Fruit Fly; Addition and 

Removal of Quarantined Areas in 

California 

Correction 

In rule document E7–801 beginning 

on page 2597 in the issue of Monday, 

January 22, 2007 make the following 

correction: 

On page 2597, in the first column, 

under the DATES heading, in the second 

line ‘‘January 22, 2006 ’’ should read 

‘‘January 22, 2007 ’’. 

[FR Doc. Z7–801 Filed 1–25–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Parts 1, 301 and 602 

[TD 9300] 

Guidance Necessary to Facilitate 

Business Electronic Filing 

Correction 

In rule document E6–20734 beginning 

on page 71040 in the issue of Friday 

December 8, 2006, make the following 

correction: 

On page 71045, in the third column, 

in the document signature, in the 

second and third lines, ‘‘Deputy 

Commissioner for Services and 

Enforcement’’ should read ‘‘Acting 

Deputy Commissioner for Services and 

Enforcement’’. 

[FR Doc. Z6–20734 Filed 1–25–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 141 

[Docket No. OW–2004–0001; FRL–8261–7] 

RIN 2040–AD93 

Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring 

Regulation (UCMR) for Public Water 

Systems Revisions 

Correction 

In rule document E6–22123 beginning 

on page 368 in the issue of Thursday, 

January 4, 2007 make the following 

corrections: 

§ 141.40 [Corrected] 

1. On page 394, in § 141.40(a)(3), in 

Table 1, under the heading 

‘‘Nitrosamines’’, the table is corrected 

starting with the sixth row to read as 

follows: 

TABLE 1.—UCMR CONTAMINANT LIST

[List 2: Screening Survey Chemical Contaminants] 

1—Contaminant 2—CAS registry number 

3—Analytical methods a

4—Minimum 

reporting 

level b

5—Sampling location c

6—Period during which 

monitoring to be completed 

*****

Nitrosamines 

*****

N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR) ................... 930–55–2 EPA 521 h ... 0.002 μg/L .. DSMRT and EPTDS ......... 1/1/2008–12/31/2010 

[List 3: Pre-Screen Testing to be Sampled After Notice of Analytical Methods Availability] 

1—Contaminant 2—CAS registry number 

3—Analytical methods a4—Minimum 

reporting 

level b

5—Sampling location c

6—Period during which 

monitoring to be completed 

Reserved i ............................................... Reserved i Reserved i ... Reserved i ... Reserved i .......................... Reserved i

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. Z6–22123 Filed 1–25–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES6
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Paleomagnetism, paleogeographic origins, and uplift history of the Coast Range ophiolite at Mount Diablo, California      

      January 1, 1998    

Divergent paleogeographic origins have been proposed for the Coast Range ophiolite of western California which are testable using paleomagnetic methods. Paleomagnetic data for Middle Jurassic pillow lavas and diabase sills of the Coast Range ophiolite at Mount Diablo, northern California, indicate that they contain two components of remanent magnetization. The characteristic directions have normal and reversed polarities and apparently are carried by Ti-poor magnetite. This magnetization is inferred to have been acquired during emplacement and seafloor alteration at an ancient spreading ridge. The paleolatitude calculated from its structurally corrected mean direction is 20??N ?? 9?? and agrees with the expected direction for stable North America; this result is also consistent with the concordant paleolatitude (32??N ?? 8??) recently determined for Upper Jurassic Coast Range ophiolite at Stanley Mountain in southern California. In addition, clockwise vertical axis rotation of Mount Diablo (143?? ?? 11??) is indicated by the characteristic magnetization direction. An overprint component is inferred to have been acquired during uplift of Mount Diablo since the Miocene.

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 185 (Thursday, September 24, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 51124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20924]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 185 / Thursday, September 24, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 51124]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1


Orders Eligible for Post-execution Allocation

Correction

    In rule document 98-22933 beginning on page 45699, in the issue of 
Thursday, August 27, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 45699, in the first column, under the heading FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, in the fourth line, ``Anderson'' should 
read Andresen''.
    2. On page 45699, in the first column, under the heading Table of 
Contents, in the ninth line, ``1.35(a-1)'' should read ``1.35(a-
1)(5)(i)''.
    3. On page 45699, in the second column, in the 16th line, ``1.35(a-
1)(5)(iii)'' should read ``1.35(a-1)(5)(ii)''.
    4. On page 45700, in the second column, under the heading 
II.Amendments to Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1), in the third line, 
``Orders eligible for post-execution allocation,'' should read ``Orders 
eligible for post-execution allocation''.
    5. On page 45700, in the second column, under the heading  II. 
Amendments to Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1), in the 19th line, ``as'' 
should read ``a''.
    6. On page 45700, in the third column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the tenth line, ``ere'' should read ``were''.
    7. On page 45702, in the second column, in the first full 
paragraph, in the 11th line from the bottom, ``section'' should read 
``Section''.
    8. On page 45702, in the second column, in paragraph (b)(i), 
``manager,'' should read ``manager;''.
    9. On page 45702, in the third column, in paragraph (b)(v), in the 
sixth line, ``order,'' should read ``order;''.
    10. On page 45702, in the third column, in paragraph (b)(vi) , in 
the second line, ``person.'' should read ``persons.''.
    11. On page 45702, in the third column, in the fourth paragraph, in 
the eighth line, ``bounded'' should read ``bunched''.
    12. On page 45703, in the third column, under heading  D. 
Disclosure Final Regulation 1.35(a-1)(5)(iii), in the third line, 
``writing'' should read ``writing,''.
    13. On page 45703, in the third column, in the 7th line from the 
bottom, ``MFA'' should read ``MFA,''.
    14. On page 45704, in the second column, in the second paragraph, 
in the first line, ``In'' should read ``The''.
    15. On page 45704, in the second column, under the heading, 2. 
Comments Received, in the ninth line, ``provided'' should read 
``provide''.
    16. On page 45704, in the second column, in the footnotes, in the 
eighth line from the bottom, ``Goldman,'' should read ``Goldman.''.
    17. On page 45706, in the third column, in the footnotes, in the 
tenth line from the bottom, ``and or'' should read ``and of''.
    18. On page 45709, in the second column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the first line, ``1.35(a-'' should read ``1.35 (a-1)(5) 
generally applies to large users of the market. It''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The use of coupled atmospheric and hydrological models for water-resources management in headwater basins      

      January 1, 1998    

Coupled atmospheric and hydrological models provide an opportunity for the improved management of water resources in headwater basins. Issues currently limiting full implementation of coupled-model methodologies include (a) the degree of uncertainty in the accuracy of precipitation and other meteorological variables simulated by atmospheric models, and (b) the problem of discordant scales between atmospheric and bydrological models. Alternative methodologies being developed to address these issues are reviewed.

## Citation Information
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(formerly Clamshell Enterprises, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin Berns, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Berns
Martin Berns
Chief Executive Officer


November 12, 2003
Exhibit32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Kendall Cowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                  |  |                        |  |  |  |  |
|------------------|--|------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| /s/Kendall Cowan |
| Name:            |  | KendallCowan           |
| Title:           |  | Chief FinancialOfficer |
| Date:            |  | May 16,2005            |
|                  |

This certification accompaniesthe Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

----
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 203 (Friday, October 20, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 62050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-17229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

31 CFR Part 256

RIN 1510-AA52


Obtaining Payments From the Judgment Fund and Under Private 
Relief Bills

Correction

    In rule document E6-17229 beginning on page 60848 in the issue of 
Tuesday, October 17, 2006 make the following correction:


Sec.  256.50  [Corrected]

    On page 60851, in the second column, Sec.  256.50(a) should read as 
follows:


Sec. 256.50  How does FMS process back pay awards?

    The submitting agency may request one of two methods to process 
back pay awards.
     (a) One method has three parts. The first part is a payment of net 
back pay (and interest if authorized), which is sent to the plaintiff 
or to the plaintiff's attorney, as directed by the submitting agency. 
The second part is a payment to the agency of deductions from the net 
back pay. The third part is a payment of attorney fees, which is sent 
directly to the attorney.

[FR Doc. Z6-17229 Filed 10-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Jerome J. FERRIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3476

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Order filed October 29, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00726

- CV

____________ BANK OF AMERICA, N.A , Appellant

V. GEOFFREY A. GROFF, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 1097237



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 19, 2019. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedu re from paying c osts has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before November 13, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appella n t fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal
will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
QUOC BAO LE-HUU, Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina Banking Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by Asset Acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-960

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                             300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,627,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     (719)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.22(b)


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 2


TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment No. 2 to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated August 3, 2017, is by and between Drone Aviation
Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation with an address 11651 Central Parkway #118, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (the “Company”),
and Jay H. Nussbaum (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into an Employment Agreement on April 27, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into an Amendment No. 1 on September 26, 2016 (Nussbaum Amendment No. 1); and


 


WHEREAS,
the parties wish to further amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below, with the understanding that all other provisions
of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.          Section
4 of the Employment Agreement- Compensation of Employee- is hereby modified to $240,000 annual base salary.


 


2.          The terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date first stated above.


 





	 	DRONE AVIATION HOLDING CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Kendall Carpenter
	 	 	Name: Kendall W. Carpenter
	 	 	Title:   Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Jay H. Nussbaum
	 	 	Name: Jay H. Nussbaum
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MoneyFlow Systems International Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended October 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2006



BY:  /s/ Harold F. Schultz

HAROLD F. SCHULTZ

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFER
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

37170

Vol. 63, No. 131

Thursday, July 9, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and

Technology

15 CFR Part 280

[Docket Number: 980623159-8159-01]

RIN 0693-AB47

Implementation of the Fastener Quality

Act

Correction

In rule document 98–17319,

beginning on page 35507, in the issue of

Tuesday, June 30, 1998, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 35508, in the first column,

the heading ‘‘PART 280—FASTERNER

QUALITY ’’ should read ‘‘PART 280—

FASTENER QUALITY ’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, in the 18th line ‘‘Qaulity’’

should read ‘‘Quality’’.

§ 280.12 [Corrected]

On page 35508, in the first column:

3. In paragraph (a), in the second line,

‘‘Qaulity’’ should read ‘‘Quality’’.

4. In paragraph (b), in the second line,

‘‘october’’ should read ‘‘October’’.

5. In paragraph (b), in the fourth line,

‘‘not’’ should read ‘‘been’’.

6. In paragraph (b), in the 8th line,

‘‘charteristics’’ should read

‘‘characteristics’’.

7. In paragraph (c), in the third line,

‘‘october’’ should read ‘‘October’’.

§ 280.602 [Corrected]

8. On page 35508, in the first column,

in paragraph (k), in the second line,

after ‘‘prior’’ insert ‘‘to’’.

§ 280.810 [Corrected]

9. On page 35508, in the second

column, in paragraph (c)(3)(i)(A)(4), in

the second line from the bottom,

‘‘Registrary’’ should read ‘‘Registrar’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

Correction

In notice document 98–17405,

appearing on page 35931, in the issue of

Wednesday, July 1, 1998, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 35931, in the second

column, below the 14th line, insert

‘‘Agreement No.: 224–200870–002’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, below the 29th line, insert

‘‘Agreement No.: 224–201003–001’’.

3. On the same page in the third

column, ‘‘Agreement No.: 224–201054’’

should be added after the third line.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 4.17**

***Convenience Translation from theGerman Original***

**KIM SCHINDELHAUER**

Chairman of theSupervisory board of

AIXTRON AG

Mr Timothy McEntee

The Board, AIXTRON AG

Kackertstr.15-17

D-52072Aachen

Date May 11, 2004

**Boardservice contracts — regulation on profit-sharing bonus**

DearMr McEntee

Asalready advised, I am pleased to confirm once again in writing the resolutionof the Supervisory Board concerning the regulation on the profit-sharing bonusagreed with you.

Forthe financial year 2004, s. 4 no. 2 of the board service contract will beamended to the effect that:

1.               8% (previously 2%) of the consolidatedprofit for the year shall be made available to the full board as the bonus pot;

2.               theconsolidated profit for the 2004 financial year will not be reduced by anylosses brought forward from previous years;

3.               theaggregate amount of the bonus pot islimited to in total €1.0 million.

Allother regulations remain unchanged.

Yourssincerely

[signed]

K. Schindelhauer

 

----