alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The occurrence of glyphosate, atrazine, and other pesticides in vernal pools and adjacent streams in Washington, DC, Maryland, Iowa, and Wyoming, 2005-2006      

      January 1, 2009    

Vernal pools are sensitive environments that provide critical habitat for many species, including amphibians. These small water bodies are not always protected by pesticide label requirements for no-spray buffer zones, and the occurrence of pesticides in them is poorly documented. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of glyphosate, its primary degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid, and additional pesticides in vernal pools and adjacent flowing waters. Most sampling sites were chosen to be in areas where glyphosate was being used either in production agriculture or for nonindigenous plant control. The four site locations were in otherwise protected areas (e.g., in a National Park). When possible, water samples were collected both before and after glyphosate application in 2005 and 2006. Twenty-eight pesticides or pesticide degradation products were detected in the study, and as many as 11 were identified in individual samples. Atrazine was detected most frequently and concentrations exceeded the freshwater aquatic life standard of 1.8 micrograms per liter (μg/l) in samples from Rands Ditch and Browns Ditch in DeSoto National Wildlife Refuge. Glyphosate was measured at the highest concentration (328 μg/l) in a sample from Riley Spring Pond in Rock Creek National Park. This concentration exceeded the freshwater aquatic life standard for glyphosate of 65 μg/l. Aminomethylphosphonic acid, triclopyr, and nicosulfuron also were detected at concentrations greater than 3.0 μg/l.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Karen C. Rice, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Hydrologist

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

####             Michael Focazio, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Environmental Health Program Coordinator

Ecosystems Mission Area

## Related Content

####             Karen C. Rice, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Hydrologist

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

####             Michael Focazio, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Environmental Health Program Coordinator

Ecosystems Mission Area

### Contact

####               Colorado Water Science Center - Main Office          

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center, Building 53, MS-415Lakewood, CO80225United States

(303) 236-6900

(303) 236-4912

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

#### Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

1730 East Parham RoadRichmond, VA23228United States

(804) 261-2600

(804) 261-2657

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - iowa
                  -  Maryland
                  -  Washington D.C.
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

39313

Vol. 62, No. 140

Tuesday, July 22, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 97N–0260]

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request

Correction

In notice document 97–18525,

beginning on page 37923, in the issue of

Tuesday, July 15, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 37923, in the third column,

in the DATES section, ‘‘September 15,

1997’’ should be inserted.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping

Requirements, Agency Information

Collection Activity Under OMB Review

Correction

In notice document 97–18470,

appearing on page 37949, in the issue of

Tuesday, July 15, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 37949, in the first column, in

the DATES section, ‘‘August 14, 1997’’

should be inserted.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 27

[CGD 96-052]

RIN 2105-AC63

Civil Money Penalties Inflation

Adjustments; Correction

Correction

In rule document 97-17147 beginning

on page 35385, in the issue of Tuesday,

July 1, 1997, make the following

correction:

§ 27.3 [Corrected]

On page 35387, in the table, in the

first column titled U.S. Code citation, in

the last line,‘‘46 U.S.C. 5123’’ should

read ‘‘49 U.S.C. 5123’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 228 (Friday, November 27, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 65636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-21127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD01-98-125]
RIN 2115-AE46


Special Local Regulations: Greenwood Lake Powerboat Classic, 
Greenwood Lake, New Jersey

Correction

    In proposed rule document 98-30446, beginning on page 63426, in the 
issue of Friday, November 13, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 63426, in the third column, under DATES, in the second line 
``January 12, 1998'' should read ``January 12, 1999''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Techniques for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in South Carolina      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

Methods are provided for estimating flood magnitudes at recurrence intervals of 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 years, for unregulated rural streams in South Carolina with drainage areas greater than 1.0 square mile. Multiple regression analyses were used to define the relation between flood discharge and basin and climatic variables. The analyses indicated that flood discharge is related to the drainage area and physiographic location of the basin. Accordingly, equations were developed for the Lower Coastal Plain, Inner Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Blue Ridge provinces. The standard errors of estimate range from 31 to 56 percent. Station data used in the analyses are listed in the report. 

Individual relations of flood discharge and frequency to drainage area are given for some of the regulated major streams, including the Pee Dee, Catawba, Wateree, Broad, Saluda, Congaree, Santee, and Savannah Rivers. Storm tide-recurrence interval relations along the South Carolina coast indicate that the 500-year tide height can exceed 19 feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, at some locations. 

A compilation of flood records for gaging stations is included as supplemental data.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - South Carolina

View All **
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 10677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10304]

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 42 / Wednesday, March 4, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 10677]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 600 and 660

[Docket No. 971229312-7312-01; I.D. 121697C]

Magnuson Act Provisions; Foreign Fishing; Fisheries off West 
Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish 
Fishery; Annual Specifications and Management Measures

Correction

     In rule document 97-34234 beginning on page 419, in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 6, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 419, the ``Docket No.'' should read as set forth above.
    2. On page 431, in the third column, in the shortspine thornyheads 
section, in the second line,. ``DTC'' should read ``DTS''.
    3. On page 439, in the third column, in paragraph (c) introductory 
text, in the seventh line, ``backcod'' should read ``blackcod''.
    4. On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph (c)(i), in 
the 10th line, ``thronyheads'' should read ``thornyheads''.
    5. On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph (c)(ii):
      a. In the first line ``1988'' should read ``1998''.
      b. In the third line, ``37,999 lb'' should read ``37,000 lb''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Trends in lake chemistry in response to atmospheric deposition and climate in selected Class I wilderness areas in Colorado, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming, 1993-2009      

      January 1, 2011    

In 2010, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Air Resource Management, began a study to evaluate long-term trends in lake-water chemistry for 64 high-elevation lakes in selected Class I wilderness areas in Colorado, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming during 1993 to 2009. The purpose of this report is to describe trends in the chemical composition of these high-elevation lakes. Trends in emissions, atmospheric deposition, and climate variables (air temperature and precipitation amount) are evaluated over a similar period of record to determine likely drivers of changing lake chemistry. Sulfate concentrations in precipitation decreased over the past two decades at high-elevation monitoring stations in the Rocky Mountain region. The trend in deposition chemistry is consistent with regional declines in sulfur dioxide emissions resulting from installation of emission controls at large stationary sources. Trends in nitrogen deposition were not as widespread as those for sulfate. About one-half of monitoring stations showed increases in ammonium concentrations, but few showed significant changes in nitrate concentrations. Trends in nitrogen deposition appear to be inconsistent with available emission inventories, which indicate modest declines in nitrogen emissions in the Rocky Mountain region since the mid-1990s. This discrepancy may reflect uncertainties in emission inventories or changes in atmospheric transformations of nitrogen species that may be affecting deposition processes. Analysis of long-term climate records indicates that average annual mean air temperature minimums have increased from 0.57 to 0.75 °C per decade in mountain areas of the region with warming trends being more pronounced in Colorado. Trends in annual precipitation were not evident over the period 1990 to 2006, although wetter than average years during 1995 to 1997 and drier years during 2001 to 2004 caused a notable decline in precipitation in the middle part of the record.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

## Related Content

#### M. Alisa Mast

##### Research Hydrologist

Colorado Water Science Center

mamast@usgs.gov

303-236-6989

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Colorado Water Science Center - Main Office          

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center, Building 53, MS-415Lakewood, CO80225United States

(303) 236-6900

(303) 236-4912

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Colorado;Idaho;Utah;Wyoming
                  - Colorado
                  - Idaho
                  - Utah
                  - Wyoming

View All **
Antwonne M. GORDON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2064

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology, 1931      

      January 1, 1932    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - (-)products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)

## By Year

Data Release        February 5, 2024        Geochemistry and High-Resolution Backscattered Electron Imaging of Meteor Crater Impact Melts

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Sample Request Form

Forms        September 26, 2018        Meteor Crater Drill Cuttings Sampling Protocol

Data Release        February 17, 2023        Meteor Crater, Northern Arizona: Drill Hole Sample Collection, 1970-1973, and Curation, 2010-2013

Data Release        February 8, 2023        A Lithostratigraphic Analysis of the Meteor Crater Ejecta Blanket: Measurements, Assigned Facies, and Unit Thickness
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No . FAA-



## ~ 0\ 

# 4--

**~ot** 

# 3
-

**~5- o~<e**  

# A.t:> 0 

# la '0 

# 3 Directorate Iden t ifier:

- AD ( (y ou make c.:lum J{I!S to the t• a/

ue

s in the table hl!low. yo u must e nsur e the totals update a c c o rdingly {l 1 /J ey t!o not, dilk to r T u h) i n t o uud 1hen o ut oj 1he c hange d ce ll

. Estimated Costs: Act ion Costs pe r Product ( e.g., aircraft , engine, (e.g ., In s pecti on, pro peller, appl i ance)

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of T otal Cost Do not includ e on- (include cost ( labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet condition co sts h e re access , testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and clo s e-up) our) Products 

### 250 hour inspections (carry 2.0 $0 

### 6300 over from o riginal AD) Detailed In spection (includes inspect ion o f thermostat s witc h , 1. 0 $0 

### 6300 upper limit switch , solenoid val ve , fu e l pump , o n/off switch) General inspection ( includes ventilating air inlet, combustion air 2.0 $0 

### 6300 inlet, exhaust outlet, drain lin e, fue l lines, electrical wiring Pressure Decay 2.0 6 , 300 

### TestThe known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,748 , 500 Costs covered under warranty (if 

### known) $
On-Condition Costs: 

# G Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g. , Inspection , (include access , (@$85/hour)

r e placement ) tes ting , and clo s eup) Replace combustion heater 8.0 $3 , 900 tube and/or other defective parts The other 4 oncondition costs 

### 0.0 $0 remain the same as theNPRM. 

### 0
. 0 $0 0.0 $0 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( U se this fi eld t o explain anything in the Estim a ted Costs table that was assum e d or might not be obvious
. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a "significan t regulatory action" ? 

# G YES* 

# D NOI2] *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

## @ YES* 

# D NO 

### 12] *Explanati o n : 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer . 

# G YES 

## D NOI2] Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific req uirements for aircraft operated in A la s ka where av iation might be the only mode of transportation? 

# G YES* 

## D NOI2]

* Explanation:



### , .
Professtonc SJr ~evors & i 1ioppers 

January 19, 2016 

Brittany Newton 

Program Analyst 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Brittany Newton, 

This letter provides the information missing from our petition (Docket NO. FAA 2015-4727). The 

response is provided below. 

FAA Comments: 

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

• Any additional information, views, arguments available to support your request. 

Allen & Company Responses: 

The enhanced safety achieved by replacing significantly larger manned aircraft carrying crew, 

passengers, and flammable fuel with small UAS carrying no passengers, crew, or flammable fuel under 

the specific guidelines and procedures proposed by Petitioner gives FAA good cause to find that the UAS 

operations enabled by this petition are in the public interest. Specifically, the potential for damage or 

harm to the public as a result of a UAS accident under the conditions and limitations proposed herein 

utilizing Petitioner's small, ultra-lightweight UAS carrying no passengers, crew, or flammable fuel or 

other dangerous materials is far less than the threat posed to the public by normal manned aircraft 

operations. Moreover, by replacing the manned aircraft traditionally used for the kinds of operations 

proposed by Petitioner with small UAS, Petitioner will be able to provide aerial operations services at a 

greatly reduced cost, making these kinds of services available to a greater range of businesses and 

consumers, thereby enhancing the utility of aerial operations and benefitting the economy as a whole. 

Similarly, the small, battery-powered UAS utilized by Petitioner will benefit the public as a whole by 

greatly reducing the pollution and ecological impact associated with traditional aircraft and rotorcraft 

16 E Plant Street • Winter Garden, Florida 34787 • 407/654/5355 • FAX 407/654/5356 
operations, and utilizing Petitioner's UAS for precision agriculture will allow for a more efficient 

application of fertilizers and pesticides, which will ultimately reduce the negative effects on the 

environment and consumers associated with these practices, which will benefit the public as a whole. 

Congress and the FAA, through passage of the Reform Act and in numerous Exemptions (see e.g. 

Exemption No. 11062), have already recognized that UAS provide a greater degree of flexibility and 

safety than traditional manned aircraft when used within certain operational limits and for the kinds of 

operations proposed herein by Petitioner. Granting Petitioner exemption to operate its UAS 

commercially furthers economic growth and public safety while limiting the ecological impacts of aerial 

operations. Thus, FAA has good cause to grant this petition. 

Sincerely, 

PSM, Vice-President 

Allen & Company, Inc. 

16 E. Plant Street 

Winter Garden, Fl 34787
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00271-CV

Mihail Chrissos a/k/a Mihail Chryssos and Maria Chrissos a/k/a Maria Chryssos

v.

PlainsCapital Bank

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018DCV-5967-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 8, 2022
STATE EX REL. Glendell CASTON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 17-KH-0364

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's sentencing claims are not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 2009-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. In addition, relator filed his time computation claim in the incorrect venue. R.S. 15:571.15. As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the *827procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


      Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


     In  connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for
the period ended December 31, 2003 as  filed  with  the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities  and  on  the  dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2003,  that  to  his  knowledge:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operation of the
Company.



               /s/  Jon  R.  Latorella
               Jon  R.  Latorella
               President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
               August 19, 2004


               /s/  James  C.  Fields
               James  C.  Fields
               Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer
               August 19, 2004