alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.43





AMENDMENT
NUMBER THREE TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT





This
Amendment Number Three is made as of December 30, 2008, to the Employment
Agreement dated as of April 16, 2007 (the “Agreement”), by and between Southern
Community Bank and Trust and Southern Community Financial Corporation and James
C. Monroe (“Officer”).





1.  The
Agreement is amended by adding the following Paragraph:





“15.      Compliance
with ESSA. To the extent that any payment under this Agreement would
constitute a prohibited parachute payment under Section 111(b)(2)(C) of the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), the Bank agrees to pay
Officer an additional payment equal to the prohibited payment on July 1, 2012,
or if later, the earliest date when Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA no longer
prohibits such payment.  Such payment shall be made in a single lump
sum in cash, without interest.  The Officer may be entitled to
severance payments from multiple agreements and plans with the
Bank.  The Bank, it its sole discretion, shall determine which
payments shall be delayed in order to comply with
ESSA.   Notwithstanding anything in this paragraph to the
contrary, the additional amounts due under the Agreement shall not be paid if
the Treasury Department or other governmental agency issues guidance subsequent
to the date of this Agreement that would prohibit such payment.  A
prohibited parachute payment shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent
with Notice 2008-TAAP, Notice 2008-94 and all other current or future guidance
issued  pursuant to Section 111(b)(2)(C) of EESA or Section 280G(e) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.”





2.  No
other terms and conditions of the Agreement are affected by this
Amendment.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
above.





SOUTHERN
      COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUSTBy:
              /s/ Jeff T. ClarkJeff
      T. Clark, President


OFFICER/s/ James C. Monroe
              (SEAL)James
      C. Monroe
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Alexander P. Limbert, Chief Financial Officer of AcuNetx, Inc. (the
"COMPANY"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2008 (the "REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
June 30, 2008.

DATE: AUGUST 14, 2008

                                          /s/ Alexander P. Limbert
                                          ------------------------
                                              ALEXANDER P. LIMBERT
                                              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-50512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-942-5700-00]


Filing of Plats of Survey; California

Correction

    In notice document 98-7127 appearing on page 13426 in the issue of 
Thursday, March 19, 1998, make the following corrections:
    On page 13426, in the third column, under San Bernardino Meridian, 
California, in the fifth line, the plat of survey beginning Tps. 1 N 
and 1 S. should begin a new line. And in the 17th line ``Meets'' should 
read``Metes''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE EX REL. Terrance L. JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 17-KH-1065

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated at least two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under *260the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 29219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-7331]



Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 29219]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers


Availability of Partially Exclusive, Exclusive or Non Exclusive 
License

Correction

    In notice document E6-7331 beginning on page 28019 in the issue of 
Monday, May 15, 2006, make the following correction:
    On page 28019, in the second column, under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION, in the third paragraph, ``Date: April 24, 2004.'' should 
read ``Date: April 24, 2003.''.

[FR Doc. Z6-7331 Filed 5-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE of Louisiana v. Richard Nathaniel MILLER

NO. 2018-KH-0623

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Christopher MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 146 (Monday, July 29, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10729]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 146 / Monday, July 29, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 39515]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-635-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

Correction

    In notice document 96-18311 beginning on page 37730 in the issue of 
Friday, July 19, 1996, the Docket number should have appeared as set 
forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
+ 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION 

In re: FELIX MORE 

 

 Case No.: 20-12290-LMI 

 Chapter 7 

Debtor(s). 

___________________________ 

SUPPLEMENTAL FEE DISCLOSURE AND CERIFICATION OF SERVICE OF ORIGINAL 

REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT ON CREDITOR 

 Counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329 and 

Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, hereby files this Supplemental Fee 

Disclosure and Certification that Reaffirmation Agreement was mailed to Wells Fargo Bank, NA 

on March 7, 2020. 

 1. The Debtor has requested and believes that the following services, which are not 

contemplated by the original fee agreement between the Debtor and the attorney for the Debtor, 

are reasonable and necessary: Request, transmittal, review, negotiate and execution of 

reaffirmation agreement with the following: Wells Fargo Bank, NA. 

2. For these services, counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., has 

received a fee of $150.00 and costs of $00.00. Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has not agreed to share 

the above – disclosed compensation with person(s) who are not members or associates of 

Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. 

3. Timothy S. Kingcade certifies that the executed reaffirmation agreement with 

Wells Fargo Bank, NA was mailed to Wells Fargo Bank, NAPOB 130000, Raleigh, NC 27605, 

MAC D0202-03E on March 7, 2020. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent, via CM/ 

ECF, on March 7, 2020 to the Assistant United States Trustee. 

Case 20-12290-LMI Doc 14 Filed 03/07/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 9011-4(B) 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I 

am admitted to the Bar of the 

United States District Court for 

the Southern District of Florida 

and I am in compliance with the 

additional qualifications to 

practice in this Court set forth in 

Local Rule 2090-1(A). 

KINGCADE & GARCIA, P.A 

Counsel for the Debtor 

Kingcade Building 

1370 Coral Way ▪ Miami, Florida 33145-2960 

WWW.MIAMIBANKRUPTCY.COM

Telephone: 305-285-9100 ▪ Facsimile: 305-

285-9542 

/S/Timothy S. Kingcade_______ 

X Timothy S. Kingcade, Esq., FBN 082309 

□ Wendy Garcia, Esq., FBN 0865478 

□ Jessica L. McMaken, Esq., FBN 580163

Case 20-12290-LMI Doc 14 Filed 03/07/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-38104; File No. SR-PHLX-96-51]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change by the 
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc., Relating to an Extension of the 
Automated Options Market Pilot Program

Correction

    In notice document 97-235 beginning on page 1017 in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 7, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 1018, in the second column, in the fourth line from the 
bottom, ``[insert date 21 days after the date of this publication]'' 
should read ``January 28, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Angela PORTER, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SOVRAN ACQUISITION, L.P., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3028

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Petrology of eucrites, howardites and mesosiderites      

      January 1, 1967    

The eucrite and howardite calcium-rich achondrites and many mesosiderites are considered as a coherent meteorite assemblage, their silicates consisting essentially of calciumpoor monoclinic and orthorhombic pyroxenes and calcium-rich plagioclase feldspar. The achondrites can be grouped according to their brecciated structure as follows: eucrites—unbrecciated and monomict brecciated achondrites; howardites—polymict brecciated achondrites. Many mesosiderites contain brecciated structures; they are distinguished from the achondrites by their large metallic fraction. The structure and composition of rock fragments in the breccias indicate a complicated sequence of events including magmatic differentiation, brecciation, recrystallization and refragmentation, and ejection from the parent body. Detailed mineralogical and chemical data suggest that the magmatic differentiation proceeded primarily by the separation of pyroxene from an ultrabasic parent material that had a much lower alkali content than ordinary chondrites. Magmatic crystallization took place in environments ranging from extrusive to deep-seated intrusive. Polymict breccias contain fragments with a wide variety of magmatic and recrystallization textures, which suggests that the breccias were formed either in very large or repeated fragmentation events. Monomict breccias contain fragments with a small range of similar magmatic textures, which suggests that these breccias were formed by small or single events. Petrographic evidence suggests that many of the breccias are impact breccias. Either in their original magmatic crystallization sites or in the sites of breccia accumulation, most of these meteorites apparently had a near-surface location prior to ejection from the parent body.

Evidence obtained from eucrites, howardites and mesosiderites forms an important part of our understanding of the early evolution of the surface regions of their parent body. Chemical and oxidation conditions were different from those presently found in the Earth's crust and upper mantle, but the necessary conditions may have been present in the early history of the Earth. A lunar origin for eucrites, howardites and mesosiderites is proposed, but an asteroidal origin can not be presently excluded.

## Citation Information
EXHIBIT 31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Mark B. Lucky, certify that:  1.
        I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2009;
  2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.      The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)        disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  5.      The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 14, 2009  By:/s/ Mark B. Lucky Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-50423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-39646; File No. SR-Amex-97-44]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
Institutional Index Option Position Limits

Correction

    In notice document 98-4257, beginning on page 8723 in the issue of 
Friday, February 20, 1998, the docket line should appear as set forth 
above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 233 (Friday, December 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 67172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11204]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 67172]]



FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Extension

Correction

    In notice document 98-30604, beginning on page 63731, in the issue 
of Monday, November 16, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 63733, in the first column, in footnote number 4, in the 
fourth line ``Rule'' should read ``Rule.''.
    2. On the same page, in the second column, in the third full 
paragraph, in the fourth line from the bottom, ``perform'' should read 
``performed''.
    3. On page 63734, in the second column, in the eighth line, ``of'' 
should read ``for'' and ``that'' should read ``the''.
    4. On the same page, in the same column, in the first full 
paragraph, in the third line, ``because'' should read ``Because''.
    5. On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph 5., in the 
13th line, ``pursuant'' should read ``pursuing''.
    6. On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph 5., in the 
seventh line from the bottom, ``decision'' should read ``decisions''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Eric Stephen SCHROETER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Meteor Crater

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

Human Capital        September 19, 2018        Dave Roddy
From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

To: Rich Sewell (rich.sewell@alaska.gov) ; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; "mvcirr@gmail.com" ;

"mintovillagecouncil@hotmail.com"

Cc: Adventure@NorthernAlaska.com ; Matt Atkinson (matt@northernalaska.com) ; "Ken R. Leary" ; Schlemmer, Kevin

(OST)

Subject: Essential Air Service at Manley and Minto, Alaska - Request for Comments - Due June 4, 2014

Date: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:46:00 AM

All,

Please find attached to this email the proposals of Tatonduk Outfitters Limited d/b/a Everts Air Alaska

(Everts) and Warbelow’s Air Ventures (Warbelow’s) to provide Essential Air Service at Manley and

Minto, Alaska, for a new contract period beginning September 1, 2014. These were the only proposals

received and can also be accessed at www.regulations.gov by searching for docket DOT-OST-2004-

17563. I have briefly summarized the proposals below.

Everts proposes to provide three weekly flights on a Fairbanks-Minto-Manley-Fairbanks routing. Everts

will utilize single-engine, nine-passenger Pilatus PC-12 or Cessna 208 aircraft. For this proposal,

Everts requires an annual subsidy of $84,207.

Warbelow’s (the incumbent) proposes to continue its existing level of service with three weekly flights

on a Fairbanks-Manley-Minto-Fairbanks routing. Warbelow’s will utilize twin-engine, nine-passenger

Piper Navajo Chieftain aircraft. For this proposal, Warbelow’s requests a subsidy of $94,722.

The comments of the communities and the state are a critically important element in our carrierselection decision. We ask that you and any other interested parties carefully review the proposals and

provide us with any comments no later than June 4, 2014. We will docket this email as well as any

comments received. Please feel free to contact myself or the carriers with any questions.

Regards,

A.J.

A.J. Muldoon

Transportation Industry Analyst

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

albert.muldoon@dot.gov

(202) 366-1058
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

      ( print page 38119)    

### Correction

In notice document E7-12834 appearing on page 36475 in the issue of Tuesday, July 3, 2007, make the following correction:

In the first column, in the first paragraph, in the last line, “August 2, 2007” should read “September 4, 2007”.

[FR Doc. Z7-12834 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D