alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Provisional maps of thermal areas in Yellowstone National Park, based on satellite thermal infrared imaging and field observations      

      September 19, 2014    

View Report

Maps that define the current distribution of geothermally heated ground are useful toward setting a baseline for thermal activity to better detect and understand future anomalous hydrothermal and (or) volcanic activity. Monitoring changes in the dynamic thermal areas also supports decisions regarding the development of Yellowstone National Park infrastructure, preservation and protection of park resources, and ensuring visitor safety. Because of the challenges associated with field-based monitoring of a large, complex geothermal system that is spread out over a large and remote area, satellite-based thermal infrared images from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) were used to map the location and spatial extent of active thermal areas, to generate thermal anomaly maps, and to quantify the radiative component of the total geothermal heat flux. ASTER thermal infrared data acquired during winter nights were used to minimize the contribution of solar heating of the surface. The ASTER thermal infrared mapping results were compared to maps of thermal areas based on field investigations and high-resolution aerial photos. Field validation of the ASTER thermal mapping is an ongoing task. The purpose of this report is to make available ASTER-based maps of Yellowstone’s thermal areas. We include an appendix containing the names and characteristics of Yellowstone’s thermal areas, georeferenced TIFF files containing ASTER thermal imagery, and several spatial data sets in Esri shapefile format.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Richard Gregory Vaughan, PhD

##### Remote Sensing Lead

Yellowstone Volcano Observatory

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

gvaughan@usgs.gov

928-556-7006

#### Jacob B. Lowenstern

#####  Director, Volcano Disaster Assistance Program

Volcano Hazards Program

jlwnstrn@usgs.gov

360-993-8946

#### Laszlo Kestay, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

laz@usgs.gov

928-556-7002

## Related Content

#### Richard Gregory Vaughan, PhD

##### Remote Sensing Lead

Yellowstone Volcano Observatory

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

gvaughan@usgs.gov

928-556-7006

#### Jacob B. Lowenstern

#####  Director, Volcano Disaster Assistance Program

Volcano Hazards Program

jlwnstrn@usgs.gov

360-993-8946

#### Laszlo Kestay, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

laz@usgs.gov

928-556-7002

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Yellowstone National Park
                  - Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Surficial deposits at Gusev crater along Spirit Rover traverses      

      January 1, 2004    

The Mars Exploration Rover Spirit has traversed a fairly flat, rock-strewn terrain whose surface is shaped primarily by impact events, although some of the landscape has been altered by eolian processes. Impacts ejected basaltic rocks that probably were part of locally formed lava flows from at least 10 meters depth. Some rocks have been textured and/or partially buried by windblown sediments less than 2 millimeters in diameter that concentrate within shallow, partially filled, circular impact depressions referred to as hollows. The terrain traversed during the 90-sol (martian solar day) nominal mission shows no evidence for an ancient lake in Gusev crater.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Gusev Crater; Mars
                  - Gusev Crater
                  -  Mars

View All **
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1 for the Western District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2562

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the Unite d States v. * District Court for the * Western District o f Arkansas. Brent Loy, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 27, 1997 Fi led: December 29, 1997

___________ Bef ore McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD , Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After Brent Loy pleaded guilty to possessing wit h intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), the district court sentenced Loy to 6 0 1 months imprisonment and three years supervised release
. Loy appeals his sentence, arguing that the di strict court-2-

erred in including in his drug quantity 200 pounds o f mari juana attributed to him in his presentence repor t (PSR), in denying him an acceptance-of--3-

responsibi lity adjustment, and in denying him a downward departure based upon his health problems.
Lo y waived at sentencing his objection to the PSR & s attributio n to him of the 200 pounds of marijuana, which was bas ed upon a statement Loy gave to an investigator ; he nce, he cannot now challenge that fact, see Unite d States v. Hipolito-Sanchez , 998 F.2d 594, 596 (8th Cir
. 1993) (per curiam), and the district court did no t clea rlyerr in its drug quantity determination, se e Unit ed States v. LaRoche , 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir
. 1996). It also appears that Loy abandoned his objection to the denial of an acceptance-of-responsibilit y reducti on, but in any event, the district court did no t clearl yerr in denying Loy the adjustment, as h e continued to use drugs during pretrial supervision. See United Sta tes v. Byrd , 76 F.3d 194, 195 (8th Cir. 1996); United States v. Poplawski , 46 F.3d 42, 43 (8th Cir.) , cert. denied , 515 U.S. 110 9 (1995). As to Loy & s downward departure argument, we can not review the district court & s de cision not to depart, as its remarks at sentencin g suff icientlyevince its recognition of its authority t o do so. See United States v. Jackson , 56 F.3d 959, 960-61 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
PELICAN VIEW PROJECT, LLC, Appellant, v. BOYLE & DRAKE, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Watershed scale response to climate change--East River Basin, Colorado      

      March 19, 2012    

General Circulation Model simulations of future climate through 2099 project a wide range of possible scenarios. To determine the sensitivity and potential effect of long-term climate change on the freshwater resources of the United States, the U.S. Geological Survey Global Change study, "An integrated watershed scale response to global change in selected basins across the United States" was started in 2008. The long-term goal of this national study is to provide the foundation for hydrologically based climate change studies across the nation.

Fourteen basins for which the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System has been calibrated and evaluated were selected as study sites. Precipitation Runoff Modeling System is a deterministic, distributed parameter watershed model developed to evaluate the effects of various combinations of precipitation, temperature, and land use on streamflow and general basin hydrology. Output from five General Circulation Model simulations and four emission scenarios were used to develop an ensemble of climate-change scenarios for each basin. These ensembles were simulated with the corresponding Precipitation Runoff Modeling System model. This fact sheet summarizes the hydrologic effect and sensitivity of the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System simulations to climate change for the East River Basin, Colorado.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - East River basin
                  - Colorado

View All **
Form CGFCRD3 (7/14/2020)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−19106−SMG

Chapter: 11

In re:

Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp

dba Spacebound, fka Rockin Jump

2108 NE 63 St

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308

EIN: 47−3766108

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Scott M Grossman

on January 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM

by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions LLC.

To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

**EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY** Until further notice or unless directed otherwise, the court will ONLY hold

hearings by TELEPHONE. Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic

services FREE of charge. All attorneys shall advise their clients NOT to appear at the courthouse.

to consider the following:

Motion to Continue Hearing On: [(92 Motion to Assume/Reject, 93 Order Setting Hearing)] Filed by

Debtor Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp (McMahon, Brian) (101)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service to the extent required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 1/7/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Edy Gomez

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-19106-SMG Doc 106 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 251 (Monday, December 30, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 68821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-31230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 76

[AD-FRL-5666-1]
RIN 2060-AF48


Acid Rain Program; Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reduction Program

Correction

    In rule document 96-31839, beginning on page 67112, in the issue of 
Thursday, December 19, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 76.5  [Corrected]

    On page 67162, in the third column, in amendatory instruction 3., 
``remaing'' should read ``removing''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 59627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-21104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 915

[SPATS No. IA-002-FOR]

Correction

Iowa Regulatory Program

    Proposed rule document 98-27503 was inadvertently published in the 
Rules and Regulations section of the issue of Wednesday, October 14, 
1998, beginning on page 55025. It should have appeared in the Proposed 
Rules section.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
EXHIBIT 31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, John R. Signorello, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)          disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  5.           The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 16, 2011  By:  /s/ John R. SignorelloJohn R. SignorelloChief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20102]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 149]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-559-801, A-401-801, A-
412-801]


Anitfriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and 
Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Sweden, 
and the United Kingdom; Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of Administrative 
Reviews

Correction

    In notice document 96-31753 beginning on page 66472 in the issue of 
Tuesday, December 17, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 66473, in the table under France, in the ``BBs'' column, in 
the eighth line, ``70.73'' should read ``0.73''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Christopher TRAPNELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Abigail TRAPNELL, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4388

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT "G"

Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-7 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-7 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Summary of the Third International Planetary Dunes Workshop: remote sensing and image analysis of planetary dunes      

      August 7, 2013    

The Third International Planetary Dunes Workshop took place in Flagstaff, AZ, USA during June 12–15, 2012. This meeting brought together a diverse group of researchers to discuss recent advances in terrestrial and planetary research on aeolian bedforms. The workshop included two and a half days of oral and poster presentations, as well as one formal (and one informal) full-day field trip. Similar to its predecessors, the presented work provided new insight on the morphology, dynamics, composition, and origin of aeolian bedforms on Venus, Earth, Mars, and Titan, with some intriguing speculation about potential aeolian processes on Triton (a satellite of Neptune) and Pluto. Major advancements since the previous International Planetary Dunes Workshop include the introduction of several new data analysis and numerical tools and utilization of low-cost field instruments (most notably the time-lapse camera). Most presentations represented advancement towards research priorities identified in both of the prior two workshops, although some previously recommended research approaches were not discussed. In addition, this workshop provided a forum for participants to discuss the uncertain future of the Planetary Aeolian Laboratory; subsequent actions taken as a result of the decisions made during the workshop may lead to an expansion of funding opportunities to use the facilities, as well as other improvements. The interactions during this workshop contributed to the success of the Third International Planetary Dunes Workshop, further developing our understanding of aeolian processes on the aeolian worlds of the Solar System.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David M Rubin

##### Scientist Emeritus

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

dmrubin@usgs.gov

831-460-7401

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### David M Rubin

##### Scientist Emeritus

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

dmrubin@usgs.gov

831-460-7401

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10809]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 40637]]


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Form Under Review by the Office of Management and Budget

Correction

    In notice document 95-18657 appearing on page 39028 in the issue of 
Monday, July 31, 1995, in the first column, in the ninth line, ``Rule 
103f-3'' should read ``Rule 10f-3''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Where's the San Andreas fault? A guidebook to tracing the fault on public lands in the San Francisco Bay region      

      April 19, 2006    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Tsunami vertical-evacuation planning in the U.S. Pacific Northwest as a geospatial, multi-criteria decision problem      

      May 23, 2014    

Tsunami vertical-evacuation (TVE) refuges can be effective risk-reduction options for coastal communities with local tsunami threats but no accessible high ground for evacuations. Deciding where to locate TVE refuges is a complex risk-management question, given the potential for conflicting stakeholder priorities and multiple, suitable sites. We use the coastal community of Ocean Shores (Washington, USA) and the local tsunami threat posed by Cascadia subduction zone earthquakes as a case study to explore the use of geospatial, multi-criteria decision analysis for framing the locational problem of TVE siting. We demonstrate a mixed-methods approach that uses potential TVE sites identified at community workshops, geospatial analysis to model changes in pedestrian evacuation times for TVE options, and statistical analysis to develop metrics for comparing population tradeoffs and to examine influences in decision making. Results demonstrate that no one TVE site can save all at-risk individuals in the community and each site provides varying benefits to residents, employees, customers at local stores, tourists at public venues, children at schools, and other vulnerable populations. The benefit of some proposed sites varies depending on whether or not nearby bridges will be functioning after the preceding earthquake. Relative rankings of the TVE sites are fairly stable under various criteria-weighting scenarios but do vary considerably when comparing strategies to exclusively protect tourists or residents. The proposed geospatial framework can serve as an analytical foundation for future TVE siting discussions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Nathan J Wood, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

nwood@usgs.gov

503-251-3291

## Related Content

#### Nathan J Wood, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

nwood@usgs.gov

503-251-3291

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Washington

View All **