alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

17489

Vol. 63, No. 68

Thursday, April 9, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER97–4084–001]

Denver City Energy Associates, L.P.;

Notice of Filing

Correction

In notice document 98–8032

appearing on page 14912, in the issue of

Friday, March 27, 1998, the docket

number is corrected to read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG98-50-000, et al.]

Zhengzhou Dengwei Power Company

Ltd., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

Correction

In notice document 98–7235

beginning on page 13657 in the issue of

Friday, March 20, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 13659, in the second column,

under paragraph 15, in the docket

numbers paragraph, in the first and

second lines ‘‘OA97-271-001; and

OA97-271-001’’ should read ‘‘OA97-

510-001; and OA97-271-001’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Part 264

[INS No. 1891-97]

RIN 1115-AF03

Fingerprinting Applicants and

Petitioners for Immigration Benefits;

Establishing a Fee for Fingerprinting

by the Service; Requiring Completion

of Criminal Background Checks Before

Final Adjudication of Naturalization

Applications

Correction

In rule document 98–6828 beginning

on page 12979 in the issue of Tuesday,

March 17, 1998 make the following

correction:

§ 264.5 [Corrected]

On page 12987, in the second column,

in §264.5, in amendatory instruction

21a., ‘‘(e)(1)(v)’’ should read ‘‘(e)(1)(iv)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING

COMMISSION

25 CFR Part 514

RIN 3141-AA18

Annual Fees Payable by Indian Gaming

Operations

Correction

In rule document 98–6282 beginning

on page 12312 in the issue of Thursday,

March 12, 1998, make the following

corrections:

1. On page 12312, in the second

column, in the third paragraph from the

bottom, in the sixth line ‘‘faming’’

should read ‘‘gaming’’.

2. On the same page, in the third

column, in the first full paragraph, in

the fourth line ‘‘0.00%’’ should read

‘‘0.08%’’.

3. On page 12313, in the first column,

in the first paragraph, in the second and

third lines ‘‘gross revenues adopted by

the Commission.’’ should read ‘‘gross

revenues by the rate for those revenues

adopted by the Commission.’’.

4. On page 12315, in first column, in

the first paragraph under Economic

Impact, in the last line ‘‘$7 million’’

should read ‘‘$8 million’’.

5. On the same page, in the second

column, in the second paragraph under

Impact on Small Business Entities, in

the second line, remove ‘‘grater’’.

6. On page 12316, in the first column

‘‘Texas Rather Than User Fees’’ should

read ‘‘Taxes Rather Than User Fees’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7127

GREGORY A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman, Virginia

Parole Board,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-453-2)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice to his

right to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Williams v. Tucker, No. CA-96-453-2 (E.D. Va. July

2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jose P. FONT, Esq., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. J. Rosario PEREZ and Rosa Perez, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
10562 Beaver Creek Road 

11oore,11T 59464-9427 

April 9, 2013 

To Whom It 11ay Concern: .. -. .,_ ;-· :-. c 1.-. 

I am writing in regard to the United States Department of T~a~sp~rtation '_.- -~' ,_; 

Order Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605. I am asking you to reconsider your 

proposed termination of Essential Air Service eligibility for Lewistown, 

Montana, and 11iles City, 11ontana. 

Congress added section 419 to the Federal Aviation Act, which established 

the EAS program to ensure that smaller communities would retain a link to 

the national air transportation system. EAS was to address the concern 

that communities with relatively lower traffic levels would lose service 

entirely as carriers shifted their operations to larger, potentially more 

lucrative markets. EAS was to provide a i/minimallevel of scheduled air 

service" to il smaller and more isolated communities". Essential Air Service 

is crucial to rural isolated communities, like Lewistown and 11iles City. 

Many of the passengers who fly out of Lewistown travel from out of town 

to fly out. So they are even more remote. In the last several years, 

Lewistown has become more isolated as we have lost both our bus and 

train service. The airline is the only public transportation available to us. 

I know the number of passengers that Silver Airways is currently boarding 

is low, but I would encourage you to look farther than strictly the numbers. 

In 2009 and 2010, Great Lakes boarded substantially more passengers. 

They were flying a different schedule and route and I believe that made a 

difference. I encourage you to give a different airline a chance to show that 

they can raise the boarding numbers again. 

If the EAS funding is terminated in Lewistown, and 11iles City, Montana, 

those two towns will suffer economically. I feel that it will only be a matter 

of time until the other EAS cities in 11ontana will fall victim to funding cuts 

also. Please don't make the decision to start this downward trend until all 

avenues have been exhausted to keep these communities, as they are a vital 

integral part of Montana. 

Essential Air Service began in 1978 because of a need for it. That same 

need is still here. 

Sincerely, 

Audrey 

~~ Clark
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report of Kiwa Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Wei Li, Chief
Executive Officer, Steven Ning Ma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do
hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that:




1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                  May
      15, 2009By:
                  /s/
      Wei LiWei
      LiChief
      Executive OfficerBy:
                  /s/
      Steven Ning MaSteven
      Ning MaChief
      Financial
Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Watershed scale response to climate change--Sprague River Basin, Oregon      

      March 19, 2012    

General Circulation Model simulations of future climate through 2099 project a wide range of possible scenarios. To determine the sensitivity and potential effect of long-term climate change on the freshwater resources of the United States, the U.S. Geological Survey Global Change study, "An integrated watershed scale response to global change in selected basins across the United States" was started in 2008. The long-term goal of this national study is to provide the foundation for hydrologically based climate change studies across the nation.

Fourteen basins for which the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System has been calibrated and evaluated were selected as study sites. Precipitation Runoff Modeling System is a deterministic, distributed parameter watershed model developed to evaluate the effects of various combinations of precipitation, temperature, and land use on streamflow and general basin hydrology. Output from five General Circulation Model simulations and four emission scenarios were used to develop an ensemble of climate-change scenarios for each basin. These ensembles were simulated with the corresponding Precipitation Runoff Modeling System model. This fact sheet summarizes the hydrologic effect and sensitivity of the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System simulations to climate change for the Sprague River Basin near Chiloquin, Oregon.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - sprague river basin
                  - Oregon

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,779
<PP&E>                                         111,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,563)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,708
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,291
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,460
<CGS>                                           80,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  470,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (390,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (390,091)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.014)


</TABLE>
Tara HARRIS, Appellant, v. CALCHAS, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Geronimo PEREZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0190

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Jason Liddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports onForm 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect ofperiods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill LynchDepositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as awhole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of thelast day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing informationrequired to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included inthese reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by thedepositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreementand based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under thatagreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trusteehave each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to thecompliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similarstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the poolingor servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York andits officers and agents.        Date:  March 26, 2007 /s/ Jason Liddell   Vice President
# L_2004316EN.01008601.xml

| 15.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/86

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1784/2004

of 14 October 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 8 to 14 October 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Desert Health Products, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

By: /s/ Johnny Shannon
    ----------------------
Johnny Shannon                     Date: August 22, 2005
Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 58 (Monday, March 25, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10325]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 58 / Monday, March 25, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 12135]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No. 960223046-6046-1; I.D. 020696E]
RIN 0648-ZA09


Financial Assistance for Research and Development Projects to 
Strengthen and Develop the U.S. Fishing Industry

Correction

    In notice document 96-6490 beginning on page 11190 in the issue of 
Tuesday, March 19, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 11194, in the first column, the date above the signature 
``April 12, 1996'' should read ``March 12, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CGFI2 (11/10/20)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−12609−AJC

Chapter: 15

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Performance Insurance Company SPC

c/o Sequor Law

1111 Brickell Avenue

Suite 1250

Miami, FL 33131

NOTICE OF DEADLINE(S) TO CORRECT FILING DEFICIENCY(IES)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE DEBTOR that the above referenced case, which was filed on March 19, 2021, contains

one or more filing deficiency(ies) which must be corrected. Failure to correct a deficiency on or before the deadline posted

below the listed deficiency may result in the document(s) being stricken and/or dismissal of this case without further

notice. Deficiencies in items listed below may include failure to file the document, failure to sign the document, or failure to file

the document using the correct and/or current form that substantially conforms to an Official Bankruptcy Form. Links to all

required Official Bankruptcy Forms and AO Director's national forms and to local rules, forms, instructions and guidelines are on

the court website www.flsb.uscourts.gov.

DEFICIENCY(IES) in your case: You must correct the following deficiency(ies) by the date indicated below each deficiency.

The petition was not accompanied by a corporate ownership statement as required by

Bankruptcy Rule 1007(a)(1) and Local Rule 1002−1(A)(2).

Deadline to correct deficiency: 3/29/21

Please also be advised of the following local requirement(s):

Correcting any deficiency related to filing of petitions, schedules, statements or lists. The Local Form "Debtor's Notice of

Compliance with Requirements for Amending Creditor Information" (LF−04) and the Official Bankruptcy Form "Declaration

About an Individual Debtor's Schedules" must accompany the filing of any paper submitted subsequent to the filing of the initial

service matrix. [See Bankruptcy Rules 1007 and 1009, and Local Rules 1007−2(B) and 1009−1(D)]. If the paper you are filing to

correct the deficiency requires you to amend your service matrix, please review the "Clerk's Instructions for Preparing,

Submitting and Obtaining Service Matrices" for additional format, fee and other requirements.

Dated:3/22/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Yamileth Valencia , Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Debtor

 Attorney for Debtor

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 4 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
IceWEB, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31st, 2005, I, John R. Signorello,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IceWEB, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of IceWEB, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31st, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of IceWEB, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31st, 2005, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IceWEB,
Inc.


Dated: May 16th, 2005                        By: /s/ John R. Signorello
      ----------------                       ----------------------------
                                             John R. Signorello
                                             Chairman and CEO and
                                             Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Environmental Infrastructure Holdings Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Michael D. Parrish, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  Michael D.
Parrish.


Michael
D. Parrish


Chief
Executive Officer





April 15,
2010