alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Inventory Completion for Native American Human Remains 
from Fort Stevenson, Dakota Territory in the Possession of the Peabody 
Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Correction

    In notice document 97-23367, beginning on page 46510, in the issue 
of Wednesday, September 3, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 46511, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in the 
second from the last line, ``[thirty days following publication in the 
Federal Register]'' should read ``October 3, 1997.''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80331]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and 
Integrity; Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 95-8633 beginning on page 17780, in the issue of 
Friday, April 7, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 17781, in the first column, in paragraph 12., in the first 
line, ``Transitional'' should read ``Transnational''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 23338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10428]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 23338]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 1, 25, 91, 121, and 135

[Docket No. 25471; Amendment Nos. 1-48, 25-92, 91-256, 121-268, 135-71]
RIN 2120-AB17


Improved Standards for Determining Rejected Takeoff and Landing 
Performance

Correction

    In rule document 98-3898 beginning on page 8298, in the issue of 
Wednesday, February 18, 1998, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 8298, in the third column, in the second paragraph, in 
the first line, ``The'' should read ``To''.
    2. On page 8299, in the third column, in the second full paragraph, 
in the 12th line from the bottom, ``rejected'' should read ``reject''.
    3. On page 8303, in the second column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the fifth line from the bottom, ``disagree'' should read 
``disagrees''.
    4. On the same page, in the third column, in the first full 
paragraph, in the 13th line from the bottom, ``uaffected'' should read 
``unaffected''.
    5. On page 8307, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, 
in the 17th line from the bottom, after ``for'' insert ``the''.
    6. On page 8309, in the second column, under Depth of Water on the 
Runway, in the second paragraph, in the second line from the bottom, 
``ensuring'' should read ``ensuing''.
    7. On the same page, in the third column, in the third full 
paragraph, in the eighth line from the bottom, ``test'' should read 
``tests''.
    8. On the same page, in the same column, in the last paragraph, in 
the last line, ``titled'' should read ``title''.
    9. On page 8310, in the second column, in the first full paragraph, 
in the tenth line from the bottom, ``Typically'' should read 
``(Typically''.
    10. On page 8312, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in 
the third line from the bottom, ``trust'' should read ``thrust''.
    11. On page 8313, in the first column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the second line, ``Sec. Sec. 25.13'' should read 
``Sec. Sec. 25.113''.
    12. On page 8315, in the first column, in the seventh line, 
``standard'' should read ``standards''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



(Section 302 Certification)



I, Beth Sanders, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2004



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|/s/    Beth Sanders                             
|Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer



46
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40


### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors
Digimarc Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-31114, 333-42042, 333-65256, and 333-82660) on
Form S-8 of Digimarc Corporation of our report dated February 11, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Digimarc Corporation as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Digimarc Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Portland,
Oregon
March 29, 2002

---

QuickLinks
4/20/09 Page 1 of4 POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT
Chemical ID: P050613 Reviewer: Sherer Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary ExoueScenario'_______ Water

- _ __ Laridfill Stack ir VFu iteAir. Release activity(ie) Drinkini Water Fish Ingestion 7Q10 4 PDM exposr 3 ADR LADD ADR LADD i c= DC? ays LADD) Ap LAD 

### ADR LADDr

________ 

# I ___I___ Exceeded

_ _4_ _ _ _ 'Exposure scenario titles consist ofrelease activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 2Release activities are from engineering report's Manufacturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release activity labels. Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario iftheir releases occur at same location. 3Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (ADR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario. CC is the aquatic concentration ofconcern. 4'

This column displays concentration values for the 7Q10 streamfiow, which is defined as the average streamfiow of the 7 consecutive days oflowest flow within a 10 year period.

TSCA COINF7ENTIL4/20/09 Page2of4

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Chemical ID: P050613 Assessor: Sherer ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number ofRelease Sites: Release Activity:

Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Non-sludge/Sludge 

### Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) Remarks:4/20/09 Page3of4 POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Chemical ID: P0506134/20/09 Page 4 of4
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 85 (Friday, May 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-985-97-0777-00; WYW139860]


Notice of Realty Action: Wyoming

Correction

    In notice document 97-5084, appearing on page 9446 in the issue of 
Monday, March 3, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 9446, in the third column, under Sixth Principal Meridian, 
the legal description should read as follows:
T. 40 N., R. 79 W.,
Sec. 25, SE\1/4\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, NE\1/4\NW\1/
4\SW\1/4\, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\SW\1/4\.
 Containing 20 acres, more or less.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
XUAN LANG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Michael J. SCOTT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Grant.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 17489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG98-50-000, et al.]


Zhengzhou Dengwei Power Company Ltd., et al.; Electric Rate and 
Corporate Regulation Filings

Correction

    In notice document 98-7235 beginning on page 13657 in the issue of 
Friday, March 20, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 13659, in the second column, under paragraph 15, in the 
docket numbers paragraph, in the first and second lines ``OA97-271-001; 
and OA97-271-001'' should read ``OA97-510-001; and OA97-271-001''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE of Louisiana v. Marquise OLIVER

NO. 2018-KH-0423

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1952

_____________________________

VASILIY BABICHEV,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James Daniel, Judge.

February 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Vasiliy Babichev, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Terrestrial subaqueous seafloor dunes: Possible analogs for Venus      

      April 6, 2017    

Dunes on Venus, first discovered with Magellan Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) in the early 1990s, have fueled discussions about the viability of Venusian dunes and aeolian grain transport. Confined to two locations on Venus, the existence of the interpreted dunes provides evidence that there could be transportable material being mobilized into aeolian bedforms at the surface. However, because of the high-pressure high-temperature surface conditions, laboratory analog studies are difficult to conduct and results are difficult to extrapolate to full-sized, aeolian bedforms. Field sites of desert dunes, which are well-studied on Earth and Mars, are not analogous to what is observed on Venus because of the differences in the fluid environments. One potentially underexplored possibility in planetary science for Venus-analog dune fields could be subaqueous, seafloor dune fields on Earth. Known to the marine geology communities since the early 1960s, seafloor dunes are rarely cited in planetary aeolian bedform literature, but could provide a necessary thick-atmosphere extension to the classically studied aeolian dune environment literature for thinner atmospheres. Through discussion of the similarity of the two environments, and examples of dunes and ripples cited in marine literature, we provide evidence that subaqueous seafloor dunes could serve as analogs for dunes on Venus. Furthermore, the evidence presented here demonstrates the usefulness of the marine literature for thick-atmosphere planetary environments and potentially for upcoming habitable worlds and oceanic environment research program opportunities. Such useful cross-disciplinary discussion of dune environments is applicable to many planetary environments (Earth, Mars, Venus, Titan, etc.) and potential future missions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Venus

View All **
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 228 (Monday, November 25, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 59930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-31125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration
[Docket No. PS-142; Notice 3]

Program Framework for Risk Management Demonstrations

Correction

     In notice document 96-29367 beginning on page 58605 in the issue 
of Friday, November 15, 1996 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 58605, in the third column, in the fourth line from the 
bottom, ``(Insert 60 days from publication date)'' should read 
``January 14, 1997''.
    2. On page 58606, in the first column, in the seventh line, 
``(Insert 30 days from publication date)'' should read ``December 16, 
1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
ex10_1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDING AGREEMENT







           THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT (the “Amending Agreement”), is made and entered into on February 29, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Circle Star Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation with a principal business address of 919 Milam Street, Suite 2300, Houston, Texas, 77002 (the “Company”) and S. Jeffrey Johnson, a resident of Texas (the “Executive”).







           WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an executive employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), effective October 1, 2011;







WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.2(i) of the Employment Agreement, the Executive will receive 1,514,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Restricted Shares”), payable and issued, 1/3 on March 1, 2012, 1/3 on June 1, 2012, and 1/3 on September 1, 2012; and







WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement to change the vesting and payable dates of the Restricted Shares.







           NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the respective covenants and agreements of the parties herein contained, and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending legally to be bound, hereby agree as follows:







1.           Section 4.2(i) of the Employment Agreement is replaced in its entirety with the following provision:







(i)           Restricted Share Issuance 1: 1,514,000 Restricted Shares payable and issued on the following schedule: 1/3 on March 1, 2013, 1/3 on June 1, 2013, 1/3 on September 1, 2013.







2.           This Amending Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]











  





  











  













           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto or their duly authorized representatives have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.


 


 


 



	 	

CIRCLE STAR ENERGY CORP.


	 	 
	 	 
	 	By: _______________________________ 

Name: _____________________________


Title: ______________________________


	 	 
	 	
__________________________________



S. Jeffrey Johnson
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date:  March 29, 2005                    /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                         ------------------------
                                         President
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

 )

In re ) CASE NO. 18-11977-RAM

 ) CHAPTER 13

JUAN GONZALEZ and CAROLINA )

GONZALEZ, )

 )

Debtors. )

 )

 )

DR. MARIA GABRIELA NOGUERRA, )

et al., )

 )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 )

vs. ) ADV. NO. 21-01140-RAM

 )

JUAN GONZALEZ and CAROLINA )

GONZALEZ, )

 )

Defendants. )

 )

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 22, 2022.

Case 21-01140-RAM Doc 42 Filed 03/22/22 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL (SETTLEMENT)

Based upon the settlement announced on the record at the 

pretrial conference conducted on March 17, 2022, it is -

ORDERED that this adversary proceeding is dismissed. The 

Court retains jurisdiction to enter an agreed final judgment, and 

reserves jurisdiction to enforce the settlement or any judgment 

entered pursuant to the settlement. 

###

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

Jeffrey S. Berlowitz, Esq.

Robert J. Bigge, Jr., Esq.

Case 21-01140-RAM Doc 42 Filed 03/22/22 Page 2 of 2
George E. BAKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1836

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO ELISENDER CABRERACASTILLO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71797

Agency No. A099-473-116

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Elisender Cabrera-Castillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his

application for asylum.

FILED

JUL 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71797

 Cabrera-Castillo contends that the BIA failed to state sufficient reasons to

support its decision. We conclude that the BIA’s decision was sufficiently

detailed and reasoned to facilitate our review on appeal. See Vinnanueva-Franco

v. INS, 802 F.3d 327, 330 (9th Cir. 1986) (“all that is necessary is a decision that

sets out terms sufficient to enable [the] reviewing court to see that the [BIA] has

heard, considered, and decided.”) 

Petitioner also contends that he is entitled to asylum because he will be

persecuted for his anti-gang beliefs and his refusal to be recruited by gangs. We

reject Cabrera-Castillo’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based on alleged

persecution arising from his anti-gang opinions and actions. See Barrios v. Holder,

581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir. 2009); Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738,

745-47 (9th Cir. 2008). Because Cabrera-Castillo failed to demonstrate that he

suffered harm that rose to the level of persecution or that it was on account of a

protected ground, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.