alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Implement Loads

NPDES Permitting & Nonpoint Source Controls Develop Total Maximum Daily Loads List Impaired Waterbodies 303(d) List Monitoring and Assess Waterbodies Set Water QualityStandards Adopt Verified List
Adopt Basin Management Action Plan **Florida Wa**  **te rs**  **hed Re**  **stor ation**  **Act**
Adopt TMDL in Rule 

# St **at ut**  **ory Ov er**  **view**

**Clean Wa**  **te r Act** 

# Florida W**ate rs**  **hed R es**  **to ra**  **tion Act: Agricultur e**  **Florida W tion Act: Agricultur** 

• **Authoriz es FD** **AC S to**  **Develop and Adopt BMP s**  **to Address Agricultur** **al Non**  **- Po**  **in t Sour**  **ces** • **Implemen tation Provides**  **“ Presumption of**  **Compliance ” with St**  **ate Wa**  **te r Quality St**  **andar ds**  • **Requir es Notice of Intent**  **(NOI) to FD ACS to Enroll**  **Oper at**  **ion** • **Manual specifies r ecor**  **d**   ** ke** **eping r equir**  **ements** 

### • **Authoriz es FD** **AC S to**  **Develop and Adopt BMP s**  **to Address Agricultur** **al Non**  **- Po**  **in t Sour**  **ces** • **Implemen tation Provides**  **“ Presumption of**  **Compliance ” with St**  **ate Wa**  **te r Quality St**  **andar ds**  • **Requir es Notice of Intent**  **(NOI) to FD ACS to Enroll**  **Oper at**  **ion** • **Manual specifies r ecor**  **d**   ** ke** **eping r equir**  **ements**

### Phosphorus Sour**ce Con trols**  **BMP Implemen tation**  Sour ce: 2010 South Florida Environmental R eport (Dr aft)

## Modified **Hy dr**  **ology**St ate agency - buy er s pa y r ancher - seller s for pr oviding document ed w ater and phosphorus rete ntion services over a fix ed - te rm contr act. • Competitive contr act pr ocess. • St ate agencies r equest pr oposals for pr oviding desir ed services. • Projects are select ed based on the best opportunity fo r pr oviding desir ed out comes. St ate agency - buy er s pa y r ancher - seller s for pr oviding document ed w ater and phosphorus rete ntion services over a fix ed - te rm contr act. • Competitive contr act pr ocess. • St ate agencies r equest pr oposals for pr oviding desir ed services. • Projects are select ed based on the best opportunity fo r pr oviding desir ed out comes.

# Accoun **ting fo**  **r An thr**  **opog enic**  **Land Uses Land Uses** 

Sour ce: 2010 South Florida Environmental Re port (Dr aft)

# Challeng **es**

Lake Criteria IPV and/or DPV 

### • La ye re d Numeric Nutrien t Criteria • Stream Criteria (IPV) • Lak e Criteria • Stream Criteria (DPV)



### • Pe rmit ting R egional Tr ea tmen t • Indus trial W

as tewater?



### • Limits of Te chnology
Marcus Terrell CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Urban storm-runoff modelling; Madison, Wisconsin      

      January 1, 1979    

View Document

The Illinois Urban Drainage Area Simulator was used to analyze the effects that (1) physical changes to storm-sewer conduits, and (2) increased runoff detention and infiltration would have on storm runoff in four urban basins in Madison, Wisconsin. The model was calibrated using monitoring data for the four basins collected over a 1-year period. A brief evaluation was made of a modified version of the model that simulates quality of urban runoff. Additional monitoring and computer analysis are necessary to calibrate the water-quality portion of the model before it can be used as a management tool in Madison. This study was done in cooperation with the Dane County Regional Planning Commission (DCRPC).

Tables presenting results of various storm-water-management options are included. Some notable simulation results were that a 25 percent storm-sewer slope reduction yielded only a 3 percent peak-discharge reduction, and increasing storm-sewer roughness by increasing Manning's "n" from 0.013 to 0.0^0 decreased peak discharge about 10 to 20 percent. Detention of 10 percent of runoff throughout each basin yielded peak-discharge reductions of about 10 to 20 percent. Infiltration of all parking-lot runoff reduced peak discharges 5 to 2h percent. Peak discharges were reduced by 71 to 88 percent by substituting porous pavement for conventional pavement. Draining 90 percent of the residential rooftops onto lawns instead of driveways reduced peak discharge from 7 to 31 percent. Runoff-volume reduction was similarly reduced for the induced infiltration simulations.

Storage requirements for hypothetical storm-water-treatment plants ranged from 2.6 to 29 acre-feet for the smallest and largest basins, respectively, with a treatment capacity of 25 cubic feet per second.

A brief inconclusive evaluation of the water-quality subroutines of the model was made. Close agreement was noted between observed and simulated loads for nitrates, organic nitrogen, total phosphate, and total solids. Ammonia nitrogen and orthophosphate computed by the model ranged 7 to 11 times greater than the observed loads. Observed loads are doubtful because of the sparsity of water-quality data.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - wisconsin

View All **
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50192

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN ROMERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-97-CR-137-1

--------------------

November 8, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benjamin Romero appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for possession with intent to distribute

marijuana. Romero argues that the district court incorrectly

determined that Romero supervised or led one or both of his

codefendants in the offense and that his offense level should not

have been increased by two under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). 

The district court’s determination that Romero supervised or

led one or both of the other two participants in the offense

under § 3B1.1(c) is a factual finding reviewed for clear error. 
No. 98-50192

-2-

See United States v. Valencia, 44 F.3d 269, 272-73 (5th Cir.

1995). Our review of the record reveals that the district

court’s determination was plausible in light of the record read

as a whole and was not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, Romero’s

sentence is AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1029. WILKES WOLFE v. THE STATE.

Wilkes Wolfe entered a guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter in August 2015.

In February 2021, Wolfe filed a pro se motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal,

which the trial court granted on May 3, 2021. At the conclusion of the hearing on the

motion, the court informed Wolfe that he would receive a court-appointed lawyer for

his appeal. On July 19, 2021, the court appointed counsel to represent Wolfe “in

connection with his motion to modify sentence.” On August 19, 2021, the court

entered an amended order, explaining that the reference to the motion to modify

sentence in the July 19 order was a clerical error, and clarifying that it was appointing

counsel to represent Wolfe only in connection with his out-of-time appeal. On August

27, 2021, counsel filed a notice of appeal from Wolfe’s guilty plea and sentence.

Wolfe then informed counsel that he wanted to proceed pro se on appeal, and the

court entered an order permitting counsel to withdraw on December 1, 2021. Wolfe

filed a pro se notice of appeal on December 3, 2021. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

A defendant granted an out-of-time appeal by the trial court has 30 days from

the grant of the motion to file a notice of appeal. See Carr v. State, 281 Ga. 43, 44

(635 SE2d 767) (2006); Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 876 (2) (452 SE2d 756)

(1995). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement

to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland, 264 Ga. at 872 (1). The notice of appeal

filed by counsel is untimely, as it was filed 116 days after entry of the order granting

the motion for an out-of-time appeal. Wolfe’s pro se notice of appeal is also untimely,

as it was filed 214 days after the entry of the order granting the motion for an out-oftime appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

March 11, 2022
To the extent Wolfe’s right to timely seek appellate review was frustrated due

to a trial court error, his remedy is to petition the trial court to vacate and re-enter the

order at issue in the manner described in Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147,

148-149 (1) (269 SE2d 426) (1980), disapproved in part by Wright v. Young, 297 Ga.

683, 684, n. 3 (777 SE2d 475) (2015). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/11/2022
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herbst Gaming, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Troy D.Herbst, as Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  Troy D. Herbst                               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Troy  D. Herbst                                   |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |
|   | March 31,  2010                              |

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herbst Gaming, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mary E.Higgins, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  Mary E. Higgins     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Mary  E. Higgins         |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | March 31,  2010     |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7424
BRUCE ALFONSO HATCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRINCE WILLIAM-MANASSAS DETENTION CENTER'S MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; DOCTOR ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-96-1029) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam. Bruce Alfonso Hatcher, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hatcher v. Prince William-Manassas Detention Ctr. , No. CA-96-1029 (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Edward Robert INGLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-83

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		August 13, 2008
Memorandum

January 13, 2016

To: Docket EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2015

- 0204

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region 9, Air Planning Office

Subject: Conference Call with Ports of Los Angeles on EPA’s Proposed Approval of

South Coast 2006 PM 2.5 Moderate Area Attainment Plan and Reclassification (80 FR 63640, October 20, 2015 )

Attendees:

EPA, OAR: Deborah Jordan, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the Acting Assistant

Administrator

EPA Region 9: Elizabeth Adams, Acting Director, Air Division

Wienke Tax, Planner, Air Plan ning Office

Port of Los Angeles: Rich Gold

EPA held a conference call on January 4 , 201 6 with Rich Gold , at his request, to discuss his questions concerning the process and timing of EPA’s final action on the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) moderate area attainment plan for the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS. Mr. Gold asked EPA to explain the process and timing for EPA’s final action on the SCAQMD’s commitment concerning the backstop meas ure for ports and port

- related

facilities.

EPA responded that we would take final action on the 2006 PM 2.5 Plan by mid

- March 2016. Mr. Gold inquired about the effective date of the final rule. We explained that it generally takes a few weeks to publish a rule and that we typically use a 30

- day effective date. Mr. Gold thanked us for the meeting in November and indicated that the Ports have been meeting with the State and the District about this measure

.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of XrayMedia, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raymond Dabney, President and Chief Executive Officer of XrayMedia, Inc and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date: August 17, 2004





Signature: /s/Raymond C. Dabney


Raymond C. Dabney


Chief Executive Officer











Page - 24


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of XrayMedia, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raymond Dabney, President and Chief Financial Officer of XrayMedia, Inc and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date: May 17, 2004


Signature: /s/Raymond C. Dabney


Raymond C. Dabney


Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Response of mercury in an Adirondack (NY, USA) forest stream to watershed lime application      

      June 21, 2018    

Surface waters in Europe and North America previously impacted by acid deposition are recovering in conjunction with declining precursor emissions since the 1980s. Lime has been applied to some impacted watersheds to accelerate recovery. The response to liming can be considered a proxy for future recovery from acid deposition. Increases in dissolved organic carbon concentrations have been observed in surface waters in response to increased pH associated with recovery from acid deposition. Although not previously described, recovery-related increases in dissolved organic carbon could drive increases in mercury concentrations and loads because of the affinity of mercury for dissolved organic matter. We used a before–after impact-response approach to describe the response of stream mercury cycling to the application of lime to the watershed of a small stream in the Adirondack Mountains of New York, USA. Dissolved organic carbon, total mercury and methylmercury concentrations increasedsignificantly in streamwater within two weeks of treatment, to previously unobserved oncentrations. After six months, post-treatment before–after impact-control (BACI) tests indicate that mean dissolved organic carbon concentrations and total mercury to dissolved organic carbon ratios remained significantly higher and limed site fluxes of methylmercury were lower than those at the reference stream. This pattern suggests total mercury is leaching at elevated levels from the limed watershed, but limitations in production and transport to the stream channel likely resulted in increases in methylmercury concentration that were of limited duration.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Douglas A Burns (Former Employee)          

##### Coordinator, Delaware River Basin Next Generation Water Observing System (NGWOS)

New York Water Science Center

#### Karen R Murray, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

New York Water Science Center

krmurray@usgs.gov

518-937-8740

## Related Content

####             Douglas A Burns (Former Employee)          

##### Coordinator, Delaware River Basin Next Generation Water Observing System (NGWOS)

New York Water Science Center

#### Karen R Murray, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

New York Water Science Center

krmurray@usgs.gov

518-937-8740

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New York Water Science Center          

425 Jordan RoadTroy, NY12180-8349United States

dc_ny@usgs.gov

(518) 285-5695 

(518) 285-5601

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - honnedaga lake
                  - New York

View All **
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000809

30-AUG-2013

08:03 AM
SERVED: JUNE 17, 2013 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

· (Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0040 

HEARING NOTICE 

; l p 2: 3LJ 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on October 

28 and 29, 2013, inclusive, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 14th Floor, 1100 Commerce Street, 

Dallas, TX 75242-1496. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. 

The parties shall vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper 

, pleading(s). Pleadings1 

may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service2

• 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials which are sealed) also available for viewing at 

http://www.regulations.gov. For additional information see: http://dms.dot.gov. 2 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as well as other 

materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov!about/o(fice org/headquarters o(ficeslagc!pol adjudication!agc400/civil penalty/: see also: 

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi!t!text/text-idx? c=ec(r&tpl=lecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab 02.tpl. In addition, Thomson 

Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS 

(TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database. For additional information, see the Web site. 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

· 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI0001 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

Michael L. Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1808 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Agency Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 6E 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2