alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                    92,150
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              4,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                               0
<PP&E>                                                                 1,199,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            28,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         1,266,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                          0
<BONDS>                                                                1,176,195
<COMMON>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                47,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           1,266,974
<SALES>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         103,010
<CGS>                                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                          94,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        51,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                            8,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        8,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                               8,457
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                  0


</TABLE>
Dunia RIEDEL, Appellant, v. Joseph C. RIEDEL, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3595

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1469. ZEKEMIAN TYRONE DAVIS v. THE STATE.

A jury foundZekemianTyrone Davis guilty of two counts of child molestation,

and we affirmed his convictions on appeal.

1 See Davis v. State, 327 Ga. App. 729

(761 SE2d 139) (2014). Davissubsequently filed two motionsseeking an out-of-time

appeal. The trial court denied the motions, and Davis filed this appeal. 

“An out-of-time appeal is a judicial creation that serves as the remedy for a

frustrated right of appeal.” Kilgore v. State, 325 Ga. App. 874, 875 (1) (756 SE2d 9)

(2014). Where, as here, a defendant has already had a direct appeal, he is not entitled

to an out-of-time appeal. See Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190, 191 (563 SE2d 856)

(2002) (“[T]here is no right to directly appeal the denial of a motion for out-of-time

appeal filed by a criminal defendant whose conviction has been affirmed on direct

appeal.”) (punctuation omitted). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

1 Davis subsequently challenged his sentence as void, and, in an unpublished

opinion, we vacated the sentence and remanded the case for re-sentencing. See Davis

v. State, Case No. A17A0378, decided May 3, 2017. Following re-sentencing, Davis

appealed his new sentence, but his appeal was dismissed for failing to file a brief. See

Davis v. State, Case No. A18A1164, dismissed April 12, 2018. 

June 09, 2021
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/09/2021
MILLENNIUM DIAGNOSTIC & IMAGING CENTER, INC., etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2490

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. REGINALD EARL RICE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:07-cr-01475-HMH-1)

Submitted: April 8, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, United States Attorney, E. Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Reginald Earl Rice appeals his conviction and life sentence for bank robbery by force or violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2006). Rice contends the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a constitutionally deficient search warrant. We affirm. We review the district court’s factual findings underlying a motion to suppress for clear error, and the district court’s legal determinations de novo. United States v. Wilson , 484 F.3d 267, 280 (4th Cir. 2007) ( citing Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996)). When a suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Uzenski , 434 F.3d 690, 704 (4th Cir. 2006). In reviewing the propriety of issuing a search warrant, the relevant inquiry is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that there was probable cause to issue the warrant. Illinois v. Gates , 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983). Although the search warrant at issue failed to specify the exact address of the premises to be searched, under the totality of the circumstances we find there were sufficient corroborating facts

23 establishing probable cause supporting the issuance and execution of the search warrant. See id. at 238. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Survival and tag loss in Moapa White River springfish implanted with passive integrated transponder tags      

      October 28, 2011    

We monitored survival and tag loss among Moapa White River springfish Crenichthys baileyi moapae that were surgically implanted with passive integrated transponder (PIT; 9 × 2 mm) tags. The fish used in the study ranged from 40 to 67 mm in total length and from 1.0 to 6.5 g in mass; the PIT tag: body weight ratios were 1.0–6.1%. Fish were held for 41 d in live cages within a small, warm desert stream. Survival did not differ between untagged control fish (94.5%) and tagged fish (95.6%). Survival did not appear to be influenced by fish size or PIT tag: body weight ratio, but the small number of fish that died precluded a detailed analysis. Tag retention was 100% among the 86 fish that survived over the 41 d. Our results suggest that surgically implanting 9-mm PIT tags into Moapa White River springfish as small as 40 mm is an effective method for marking them because it has minimal impacts on survival and tag retention is high. More work is needed on the effects of PIT tagging on growth and other performance metrics of springfish and other small desert fishes.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Western Fisheries Research Center (WFRC)          

6505 NE 65th StreetSeattle, WA98115-5016United States

(206) 526-6282

(206) 526-6654

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Arizona

Filters

              - connect_social_media(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(28)
              - 2023(25)
              - 2022(50)
              - 2021(37)
              - (-)2020(2)
              - 2019(37)

social mediaUSGS Science in Arizona

partnerUniversity of Arizona Remote Sensing Group
Babu THOMAS and Sumathi Babu, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HERITAGE ISLES GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3649

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Science 
-  Science Explorer 

# Science Technology

Intro
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0419

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER LEE SPANGLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 28, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2024

07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0419
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Nest success of northern bobwhite on managed and unmanaged landscapes in southeast Iowa      

      January 31, 2011    

Range‐wide declines in northern bobwhite populations (Colinus virginianus) have been attributed to concomitant loss of breeding habitat. Bobwhite management efforts to restore this habitat resource can be informed by empirical studies of associations between breeding success and multi‐scale habitat attributes. We compared bobwhite nest success in 2 southern Iowa landscapes as a function of microhabitat and landscape composition. Lake Sugema Fish and Wildlife Area (LSWA) was managed to promote bobwhite recruitment, and Harrisburg Township (HT) was an adjacent landscape dominated by private agricultural production. Survival rate modeling based on telemetry data provided evidence for age‐specific daily nest survival rate. Daily survival rates decreased as nest age increased, but the decline was more severe at HT. Nest survival at LSWA (S = 0.495, SE = 0.103) was nearly twice that on HT (S = 0.277, SE = 0.072). We found no evidence that habitat composition or spatial attributes within 210 m of a nest site significantly influenced nest success. Forb canopy at the nest site had a positive influence on nest success at HT but not at LSWA. We suggest nesting habitat with greater forb canopy cover will increase the opportunity for nesting success in landscapes with limited nesting habitat. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States
                  - Harrisburg Township
                  -  Lake Sugema Fish and Wildlife Area
                  - iowa

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water-resources investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey in Wyoming, fiscal year 1979      

      January 1, 1979    

View Document

This report contains lists of surface-water stations, ground-water stations, water-quality stations, sediment stations , and peak-flow partial-record stations in Wyoming. The locations of the data-collection sites are shown on maps. Water-resources projects in Wyoming are also described, including many that are related to development of energy resources. The general locations of the projects are shown on maps. The U.S. Geological Survey is striving to coordinate its water-resources investigations with those of other agencies. This report serves as an annual progress report to cooperators and the public.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Wyoming

View All **
TS- CDBA22

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the SubmitterAttachment #4

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical**

**Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter**  TS

- CDBA22
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30785 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES CUVILLIER, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CR-199-6-J

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Cuvillier, Sr., appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base and more than five kilograms of cocaine hydrochloride. Cuvillier executed a plea agreement waiving certain of his appellate rights; however, he reserved the right to appeal “any punishment imposed in excess of the statutory maximum.” Cuvillier’s sentence is based solely on facts to which he stipulated in connection with his guilty plea.No.04-30785 -2- Nevertheless, Cuvillier argues that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowable under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his rights under the Sixth Amendment when he stipulated to the facts supporting his guilty plea. Thus, he contends that the waiver provision in his plea agreement does not bar his appeal. He further argues that he must be resentenced because the district court’s belief that the sentencing guidelines were mandatory prevented the court from considering potential mitigating evidence. Our review of the record shows that Cuvillier’s waiver of his appellate rights was knowing and voluntary. This appeal is barred by the “plain language” of the waiver because Cuvillier’s 180-month term of imprisonment, which is based solely on his own admissions, does not exceed the statutory maximum term of life imprisonment that could have been imposed for the offense. United States v. McKinney __ F.3d __, No. 04-41223, 2005 WL 887153 at *2 (5th Cir. April 15, 2005); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A);

see Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531, 2537 (2004).
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 31584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement Concerning Reciprocal 
Arrangements for Exchanges of Information and Visits Under the 
Agreement for Cooperation for the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 
Between the Government of the United States and the Government of the 
People's Republic of China

Correction

    In notice document 98-14523 beginning on page 30483 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 4, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 30484, in the first column, the two signatures in the 
Memorandum of Understanding were inadvertently switched. The text 
should read as set forth below:
    For the Government of the United States of America:
Robert J. Einhorn.
    For the Government of the People's Republic of China:
Zheng Lizhong.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Mezzanine Investment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 16, 2004

/s/ Eric C. Bronk
Eric C. Bronk, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

The
following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Saxon Capital, Inc. on the basis of such officers knowledge and
belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

Certification

In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Saxon Capital, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2004 (the Report), the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 29, 2004

| |  | By: /s/ Michael L. Sawyer
Michael L. SawyerChief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Robert B. Eastep
Robert B. EastepChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This
certification accompanies the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part
of the Report.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Teton Dam flood of June 1976, Lewisville quadrangle, Idaho      

      January 1, 1976    

View Plate

The failure of the Teton Dam caused extreme flooding along the Teton River, Henrys Fork, and Snake River in southeastern Idaho on June 5-8, 1976. No flooding occurred downstream from American Falls Reservoir. The inundated areas and maximum water-surface elevations are shown in a series of 17 hydrologic atlases. The area covered by the atlases extends from Teton Dam downstream to American Falls Reservoir, a distance of 100 miles. The extent of flooding shown on the maps was obtained by field inspections and aerial photographs made during and immediately after the flood. There may be small isolated areas within the boundaries shown that were not flooded, but the identification of these sites was beyond the scope of the study. The elevation data shown are mean-sea-level elevations of high-water marks identified in the field. This particular map (in the 17-map series) shows conditions in the Lewisville quadrangle. (Woodard-USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Idaho Water Science Center

230 Collins Rd.Boise, ID83702-4520United States

Phone: (208) 387-1300

(208) 387-1372

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Lewisville Quadrangle
                  - Idaho

View All **
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 15
                             Harold Y. Spector, CPA
                              80 South Lake Avenue
                                   Suite 723
                               Pasadena, CA 91101




Eye Dynamics, Inc.
2301 205th Street, Suite 106
Torrance, California 90501

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Eye Dynamics, Inc. and subsidiary for the period ended June 30,
2000, as indicated in our report dated August 8, 2000; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements filed by you under the
Securities Act of 1933.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Harold Y. Spector, CPA
November 21, 2001
Q.O., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2399

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.