alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 2006)]
[Corrections]
[Page 75614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z6-18909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9296]
RIN 1545-BD60


Credit for Increasing Research Activities

Correction

    In rule document E6-18909 beginning on page 65722 in the issue of 
Thursday, November 9, 2006, make the following correction:


Sec.  1.41-6  [Corrected]

    On page 65730, in the first column, in Sec.  1.41-6(e), in Example 
5, in paragraph (ii)(A), in the second to last line in the paragraph, 
``The group credit is 0.20'' should read ``The group credit is 0.20 
x''.

[FR Doc. Z6-18909 Filed 12-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE EX REL. Wilfred GUY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0663

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Utah prairie dog population dynamics on the Awapa Plateau: Precipitation, elevation, and plague      

      October 1, 2021    

Utah prairie dogs (UPDs, Cynomys parvidens) are colonial, herbivorous rodents listed under the Endangered Species Act as threatened. Little is known about UPD population dynamics at higher elevations in the species’ range. From 2013 through 2016, we studied UPDs on five colonies at 2,645 to 2,873 m elevation on the Awapa Plateau, Utah, USA. Primary production increases with precipitation and precipitation increases with elevation on the plateau. We hypothesized that UPD body condition, reproduction, survival, and population growth all would vary directly with precipitation and elevation. Each year, we live-trapped UPDs from late-Jun through Aug, weighing each UPD, aging it as adult or pup, measuring its right hind foot, marking it for unique identification, and releasing it at point of capture. Fleas from live-trapped UPDs and opportunistically collected rodent carcasses, and rodent carcasses themselves, were tested for the agent of sylvatic plague (Yersinia pestis), a lethal invasive pathogen. Adult UPD body condition (mass:foot) increased with elevation. In addition, UPD reproduction (pups:adults) and population growth (λ) increased with precipitation. Annual survival declined from 0.49 in 2013–2014 to 0.24 in 2015–2016. We captured 421 UPDs in 2013 but only 149 in 2016. Sylvatic plague may have contributed to population declines. Notwithstanding, plague detection (yes/no by colony and year) had no statistical effect on population growth or annual survival, raising suspicion about the predictive value of binary plague detection variables. Generally speaking, efforts to conserve UPDs may benefit from the restoration and preservation of large colonies at mesic sites.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

February 22, 2022

####                 Data on Utah prairie dog body condition and reproductive success, Awapa Plateau, Utah, USA, 2013-2016              

Fort Collins Science Center

#### David A Eads, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

deads@usgs.gov

970-226-9261

#### Dean Biggins, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

Fort Collins Science Center

bigginsd@usgs.gov

970-226-9467

## Related Content

February 22, 2022

####                 Data on Utah prairie dog body condition and reproductive success, Awapa Plateau, Utah, USA, 2013-2016              

Fort Collins Science Center

#### David A Eads, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

deads@usgs.gov

970-226-9261

#### Dean Biggins, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

Fort Collins Science Center

bigginsd@usgs.gov

970-226-9467

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - awapa plateau
                  - Utah

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5201

  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand eligibility for 
public service student loan forgiveness to certain contractor employees 
                       of national laboratories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2016

Mr. Swalwell of California (for himself, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Ben Ray Lujan 
of New Mexico, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Ms. 
 Lee, Mr. Honda, Mr. Perlmutter, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. DeSaulnier, 
Mr. Cardenas, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. Fattah, and Mr. Langevin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand eligibility for 
public service student loan forgiveness to certain contractor employees 
                       of national laboratories.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness in Forgiveness Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES OF NATIONAL LABORATORIES 
              FOR PUBLIC SERVICE STUDENT LOAN FORGIVENESS.

    Section 455(m)(3)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(m)(3)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) a full-time job as an employee of a 
                        management and operating contractor of a 
                        National Laboratory (as defined in section 2(3) 
                        of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
                        15801(3))) assigned to a position at such 
                        laboratory.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect as 
if enacted on October 1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

LIZ ECHEVARRIA CASE NO. 21-13441-LMI

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

_______________________________/

OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN 

Creditor, VW Credit, Inc., files its Objection to Confirmation of Plan and states:

1. Creditor is the lienholder on the title to the following vehicle: 

2019 VOLKSWAGEN ATLAS 

VIN: 1V2YR2CA1KC559002 (“Vehicle”).

2. Creditor filed a Proof of Claim in the amount of $63,094.14, including an arrearage 

of $22,730.12.

3. Debtor’s Plan does not provide for treatment to Creditor. 

4. Accordingly, the underlying debt is not provided for in the bankruptcy and would

be deemed non-dischargeable, pursuant to the holding in Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union (In re 

Dukes), 909 F.3d 1306, 1322 (11th Cir. Dec. 6, 2018) (“So, because the [creditor’s] mortgage was 

not ‘provided for’ by the plan under § 1328(a), it was not discharged.”).

5. In the event the Debtor amends the Plan to provide treatment to Creditor inside the 

Plan, the amended Plan should conform to Creditor’s Proof of Claim.

WHEREFORE, Creditor respectfully requests the Court sustain this Objection and for 

such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 34 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 2
F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Creditor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by CM/ECF notice 

and first class mail this 14th day of July 2021.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Liz Echevarria

7905 E Dr #15-B

N Bay Village, FL 33141

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE 

Jose A Blanco

Jose A. Blanco, P.A.

355 W 49 ST

Hialeah, FL 33012

Nancy K. Neidich

POB 279806

Miramar, FL 33027

Office of the US Trustee

51 S.W. 1st Ave.

Suite 1204

Miami, FL 33130

Case 21-13441-LMI Doc 34 Filed 07/14/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
31.1














CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO RULES
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002























I, Derrick Spatorico,
certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-Kof LocatePlus Holdings Corporation for the period
ended December 31, 2009.
 
 2.   Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3.   Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant
and we have:
 
 (a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
  (b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
“Evaluation Date”); and
  (c)   presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  (a)all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  (b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and
  6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 Date:
      March 31, 2010
                  /s/
      Derrick SpatoricoDerrick
      SpatoricoActing
      President, Chief Executive Officer, and
  Treasurer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5223 

To deauthorize the Salt Creek project in Graham, Texas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2016 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To deauthorize the Salt Creek project in Graham, Texas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SALT CREEK, GRAHAM, TEXAS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The project for flood control, envi5 ronmental restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek, Gra6 ham, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 

7 Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 

8 106–53; 113 Stat. 278–279), is no longer authorized as 

9 a Federal project beginning on the date of enactment of 

10 this Act. 

11 (b) CERTAIN PROJECT-RELATED CLAIMS.—The non12 Federal sponsor for the project described in paragraph (1) 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5223 IH

1 shall hold and save the United States harmless from any 

2 claim that has arisen, or that may arise, in connection 

3 with the project. 

4 (c) TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the Army is au5 thorized to transfer any land acquired by the Federal Gov6 ernment for the project on behalf of the non-Federal spon7 sor that remains in Federal ownership on or after the date 

8 of enactment of this Act to the non-Federal sponsor. 

9 (d) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines that 

10 the land that is integral to the project described in para11 graph (1) ceases to be owned by the public, all right, title, 

12 and interest in and to the land and improvements shall 

13 revert, at the discretion of the Secretary, to the United 

14 States. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Matthew STROJEK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Richard A. RIPPEON, A.P.D., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Uncertainty quantification and propagation for projections of extremes in monthly area burned under climate change: A case study in the coastal plain of Georgia, USA      

      December 1, 2016    

Human‐caused climate change is predicted to affect the frequency of hazard‐linked extremes. Unusually large wildfires are a type of extreme event that is constrained by climate and can be a hazard to society but also an important ecological disturbance. This chapter focuses on changes in the frequency of extreme monthly area burned by wildfires for the end of the 21st century for a wildfire‐prone region in the southeast United States. Predicting changes in area burned is complicated by the large and varied uncertainties in how the climate will change and in the models used to predict those changes. The chapter characterizes and quantifies multiple sources of uncertainty and propagate the expanded prediction intervals of future area burned. It illustrates that while accounting for multiple sources of uncertainty in global change science problems is a difficult task, it will be necessary in order to properly assess the risk of increased exposure to these society‐relevant events.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Adam Terando, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Southeast CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

aterando@usgs.gov

919-515-4448

####             Alexa J. McKerrow, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Biologist

Science Analytics and Synthesis (SAS) Program

#### Jaime Collazo, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

jaime_collazo@usgs.gov

919-515-8837

## Related Content

#### Adam Terando, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Southeast CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

aterando@usgs.gov

919-515-4448

####             Alexa J. McKerrow, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Biologist

Science Analytics and Synthesis (SAS) Program

#### Jaime Collazo, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

jaime_collazo@usgs.gov

919-515-8837

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Climate Adaptation Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveMS 516Reston, VA20192United States

casc@usgs.gov

(703) 648-5801

####               Science Analytics and Synthesis Program          

W 6th Ave Kipling StLakewood, CO80225United States

### Explore Search

                  - Climate
                  - Coasts
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Georgia

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

NITV LLC

Debtor. /

Case No. 21-18481-MAM

Chapter 7

Trustee's Summary of Requested Fees and Expenses

 [If Checked] The chapter 7 trustee is not required to file and serve a Notice of Trustee's Final Report and Applications for 

Compensation on all parties of record because the amount of net proceeds realized does not exceed the amount set forth in Bankruptcy 

Rule 2002(f)(8) and the amount of any application for compensation does not exceed the amount set forth in Bankruptcy Rule 

2002(a)(6). See Local Rule 3009-1. 

Docket

Entry #

Applicant Name and

Role

 Total Fees 

Total Expenses

 Interim Fees Paid 

Interim Expenses Paid

 Additional Fees Requested 

Additional Expenses Requested

59 Michael R. Bakst, Trustee 

Trustee 

$15,859.17

$122.88

$0.00

$0.00

$15,859.17

$122.88

57 GREENSPOON MARDER, LLP 

Attorney For Trustee 

$32,983.50

$25.97

$0.00

$0.00

$32,983.50

$25.97

Dated: January 31, 2023 /s/ Michael R. Bakst, Trustee

Michael R. Bakst, Trustee

Chapter 7 Trustee

P.O. Box 407

West Palm Beach, FL 33402

Case 21-18481-MAM Doc 61-1 Filed 01/31/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2

 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the  purposes of  complying  with  Section 1,  U.S.C.,  1950,  I, the
undersigned  Chief Financial  Officer of M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company")
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies
with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company.

Dated September 14, 2004


                                            By   /s/ Dennis M. O'Connor
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                     Dennis M. O'Connor
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       16
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 17, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Pages 39138-39139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-11148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9329]
RIN 1545-BF26


Guidance Necessary to Facilitate Business Electronic Filing and 
Burden Reduction

Correction

    In rule document E7-11148 beginning on page 32794 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 14, 2007, make the following correction:

[[Page 39139]]

PART 1--[CORRECTED]

    On page 32807, in the third column, in the four lines above 
amendatory instruction Par. 46., the section heading is corrected to 
read as follows:

Sec. Sec.  1.302-4, 1.338(h)(10)-1, 1.382-2T, 1.382-6, 1.382-8, 1.1502-
13, 1.1502-32, 1.1502-92, 1.1502-94, 1.1502-95, 1.1563-3, and 1.6043-2

[FR Doc. Z7-11148 Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 31.3

 

**Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification** 

 

I, Anand Vadapalli, certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:     April 30, 2018  |   | /s/ Anand Vadapalli

Anand Vadapalli

President and Chief Executive Officer

Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
708 A.2d 680

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Edward BRADLEY.

Misc. AG No. 7,

Sept. Term, 1998.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 7, 1998.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the joint petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Edward Bradley, to suspend the Respondent indefinitely from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the petition, it is this 7th day of April, 1998,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the joint petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the Respondent, Edward Bradley, is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in the State of Maryland. It is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Edward Bradley from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Clients’ Security Trust Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-713 a3.