alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Manuel Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC15-1278.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 9, 2016.

This cause is before this Court on Rodriguez's appeal of the summary denial of his "Motion for Determination of Intellectual Disability and Successive Motion to Vacate Death Sentences with Special Request for Leave to Amend" pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and 3.203. Rodriguez's motion was filed on May 22, 2015. Rodriguez, who had never before raised an intellectual disability claim, asserted that there was "good cause" pursuant to Rule 3.203(f) for his failure to assert a previous claim of intellectual disability and only after the United States Supreme Court decided *Hall v. Florida,* 572 U.S. 701, 134 S.Ct. 1986, 188 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2014), did he have the basis for asserting an intellectual disability claim. The trial court rejected the motion as time barred, concluding there was no reason that Rodriguez could not have previously raised a claim of intellectual disability based on *Atkins v. Virginia,* 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002). The trial court further concluded that Rodriguez could not have relied on *Cherry v. State,* 959 So.2d 702 (Fla. 2007), which established the bright-line cut-off of 70 for IQ scores disapproved of in *Hall,* because he never raised an intellectual disability claim after *Atkins* as required by Rule 3.203.

We have considered the issues raised, and affirm the trial court's denial of Rodriguez's motion as time-barred for the reasons stated by the trial court.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.

QUINCE, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 167 (Friday, August 28, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45938-45939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-28]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Sabine Pass, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Sabine Pass, TX.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 31619 is 
effective 0901 UTC, October 8, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on June 10, 1998 
(63 FR 31619). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on October 8, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be 
effective on that date.


[[Page 45939]]


    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 21, 1998.
JoEllen Casilio,
Assistant Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Dos. 98-23139 Filed 8-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 38454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10716]


     

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 136 /Thursday, July 16, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 38454]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER94-1247-019]


NorAm Energy Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

Correction

    In notice document 98-18366 appearing on page 37369 in the issue of 
Friday, July 10, 1998, the docket number in the heading should be 
corrected as above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Taikwan Keman CROSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC., Appellants, v. Troy Douglas GRIMES and Tracey Grimes, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-3555

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 8, 2018

Angela C. Flowers, of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Ocala, for Appellants.

Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard, of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. ("Disney") appeals the trial court's order granting the motion for new trial filed by Troy Douglas Grimes and Tracey Grimes ("the Grimeses") based upon certain arguments made by Disney's counsel during closing and not objected to by the Grimeses. We reverse.

Disney's arguments, while indeed improper, did not rise to the high standard delineated in *Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.*, 766 So.2d 1010, 1031 (Fla. 2000). The Florida Supreme Court held in *Murphy*"that before a complaining party may receive a new trial based on [an] unobjected-to closing argument, the party must establish that the argument being challenged was improper, harmful, incurable, and so damaged the fairness of the trial that the public's interest in our system of justice requires a new trial." *Id.*; *accord* *Companioni v. City of Tampa*, 51 So.3d 452, 456 (Fla. 2010) (holding that, if a party failed to object to an instance of attorney misconduct during trial, then the conduct is subject to a fundamental error analysis pursuant to *Murphy* ). We hold that the impropriety in Disney's closing arguments could have been cured by a timely objection, after which the trial court could have sustained the objection and issued a curative instruction to the jury. Therefore, the Grimeses failed to establish that "even if the trial court had sustained a timely objection to the improper argument and instructed the jury to disregard the improper argument, such curative measures could not have eliminated the probability that the unobjected-to argument resulted in an improper verdict." *Murphy*, 766 So.2d at 1030.

Because the Grimeses did not show that Disney's arguments were incurable, it is not necessary for us to determine whether the public's interest in our judicial system requires a new trial. *See* *Carnival Corp. v. Jimenez*, 112 So.3d 513, 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ("[I]f the complaining party fails to establish that the argument being challenged is improper, harmful, *and* incurable, then the analysis does not proceed to the *180last prong of this four-part test." (emphasis added) ). We reverse the order granting a new trial and remand the case for the trial court to reinstate the jury's verdict.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water cycle processes [poster]              

      March 26, 2024    

View Report

View Report

Description

The water cycle describes how water moves from Earth’s surface into the atmosphere, then back to the surface again or to below Earth’s surface. This educational poster depicts five key water-cycle processes that transport or transform water between states: evaporation, transpiration, condensation, precipitation, and infiltration. It illustrates examples of natural and human interactions with these processes. This poster is intended for eighth-grade audiences.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Hayley Corson-Dosch

##### Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

hcorson-dosch@usgs.gov

#### Cee Nell, PhD

##### Data Visualization Specialist

Water Resources Mission Area

cnell@usgs.gov

608-828-9901

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Hayley Corson-DoschHydrologistWater Resources Mission AreaEmailhcorson-dosch@usgs.govCee Nell, PhDData Visualization SpecialistWater Resources Mission AreaEmailcnell@usgs.govPhone608-828-9901
EXHIBIT 31.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Dyas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004                By:  /s/ James Dyas
                                       James Dyas
                                       Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5119 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5119

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds available to any 
Federal department or agency for any fiscal year to purchase or issue a 
       license for the purchase of heavy water produced in Iran.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No \2\H<INF>2</INF>O from Iran 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS TO PURCHASE 
              OR ISSUE A LICENSE FOR THE PURCHASE OF HEAVY WATER 
              PRODUCED IN IRAN.

    No funds available to any Federal department or agency for any 
fiscal year may be obligated or expended--
            (1) to purchase heavy water produced in Iran; or
            (2) to issue a license for the purchase of heavy water 
        produced in Iran.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 13.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (the “Company”) for the yearly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A.K.Garg, Chairman-and-Managing Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ A.K.GargName:
A.K.GargTitle:
Chairman and Managing DirectorDate:
August 13, 2012
 
 The foregoing certificate is solely for the purposes of compliance with the aforementioned Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 67724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11208]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 67724]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 286

[DoD 5400.7-R]
RIN 0790-AG58


DoD Freedom of Information Act Program Regulation

Correction

    In rule document 98-31103, beginning on page 65420, in the issue of 
Wednesday, November 25, 1998, make the following corrections:


Sec. 286.4  [Corrected]

    1. On page 65423, in the first column, in Sec. 286.4(d)(3)(ii)(B), 
paragraph designation ``(b)'' should read ``(B)''.


Sec. 286.24  [Corrected]

    2. On page 65436, in the second column, in Sec. 286.24(f)(2), in 
the seventh full paragraph, before ``Tentative'' add ``(2)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE of Louisiana EX. REL. Vernon WASHINGTON v. Darrell VANNOY, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary

NO. 2018-KH-0769

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
Ricky Leon BAXTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
George OLMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Peters Hills basin, a Neogene wedge-top basin on the Broad Pass thrust fault, south-central Alaska      

      January 1, 2017    

The Neogene Peters Hills basin is a small terrestrial basin that formed along the south flank of the Alaska Range during a time in which there was regional shortening. The formation of the Peters Hills basin is consistent with it being a wedge-top basin that formed on top of the active southeast-vergent Broad Pass thrust fault. Movement along this thrust raised a ridge of Jurassic and Cretaceous metasedimentary rocks, which then trapped behind it Miocene and Pliocene sediments that were derived from the growing Alaska Range. The presence of this thrust fault is consistent with regional structural, stratigraphic, seismicity, gravity, and aeromagnetic data. The Peters Hills basin is no longer a depocenter, but if the Broad Pass thrust remains active, it would help explain the westward decrease in Quaternary slip rate along the Denali fault system, and it may constitute a seismic hazard that could produce earthquakes in the Mw 7.6–7.8 range.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

#### Richard G Stanley

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

rstanley@usgs.gov

650-329-4918

#### Kristen Lewis, PhD

##### Supervisory Geophysicist/USGS Geomagnetism Program Group Leader

Geomagnetism Program

klewis@usgs.gov

303-273-8471

#### Susan Karl

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

skarl@usgs.gov

907-786-7428

#### Adrian M Bender

##### Geologist

Alaska Science Center

abender@usgs.gov

907-786-7421

## Related Content

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

#### Richard G Stanley

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

rstanley@usgs.gov

650-329-4918

#### Kristen Lewis, PhD

##### Supervisory Geophysicist/USGS Geomagnetism Program Group Leader

Geomagnetism Program

klewis@usgs.gov

303-273-8471

#### Susan Karl

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

skarl@usgs.gov

907-786-7428

#### Adrian M Bender

##### Geologist

Alaska Science Center

abender@usgs.gov

907-786-7421

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - Peters Hills basin

View All **
Order entered May 15, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00335 - CV JANI - KING FRANCHISING, IN C., Appellant

V. FALCO FRANCHISING, S .A., DAVID D'HOSE, P HILIPPE FISCH, CONST ANTIN

ROMAS, AND JEAN BERN ARD GENICOT, App ellee s On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 14 - 11840



### O RDER W e GRANT appellant’s May 13, 2015 first unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than May 21, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Leon FOSTER Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, BREVARD COUNTY, Florida and Michael Falanga, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-686

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca R. McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellees.

ORFINGER, J.

The State of Florida appeals the circuit court's order denying its petition for a writ of quo warranto, challenging the Office of Public Defender's authority to intervene in civil traffic infraction cases. Based on our opinion in *State v. Grate*, No. 5D18-683, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 3595263 (Fla. 5th DCA July 27, 2018), issued simultaneously herewith, we treat this matter as a direct appeal, reverse the circuit court's order, and remand with instructions to grant the petition.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1

The circuit court considered this matter with a three-judge panel. Judge Paulk dissented and would have granted the petition.
{00144245;2}

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE:

Case No.: 21-13844-AJC

MULTICONCEP LOGISTICS, LLC,

In proceedings under CHAPTER 7

Debtor.

/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY FOR 

INTERESTED PARTY (GLADYS MANRIQUE) (RE: #[202]) [ECF No. 221].

LAW OFFICE OF ADAM I. SKOLNIK, P.A.

/s/ Adam I. Skolnik

ADAM I. SKOLNIK (FBN: 728081)

ATTORNEY FOR GLADYS MANRIQUE

1761 WEST HILLSBORO BOULEVARD, SUITE 207

DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA 33442

TELEPHONE: 561.265.1120

FACSIMILE: 561.265.1828

ASKOLNIK@SKOLNIKLAWPA.COM

CERTIFICATIONS

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional 

qualifications to practice in this Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A); and further 

certify that a true and correct copy of the above referenced Pleading(s) has/have 

been sent via First Class U.S. Mail, properly addressed and with correct postage, on 

all parties and/or electronically through CM/ECF, on parties having appeared 

electronically in the instant matter on the date and manner indicated below.

Served Upon:

Via ECF on March 2, 2023:

James B. Miller, Esq. on behalf of Barry E. Mukamal, Chapter 7 Trustee, 

bkcmiami@gmail.com

Case 21-13844-PGH Doc 222 Filed 03/03/23 Page 1 of 2
{00144245;2}

Barry E. Mukamel, Chapter 7 Trustee, bemtrustee@kapilamukamel.com, 

FL64@ecfcbis.com

Julia Kefalinos, Esq. on behalf of Hector F. Manrique, Sr., juliakefalinos@bellsouth.net;

Gregory R. Bel, Esq. on behalf of Regions Bank, gbel@grblegal.com

Morgan B. Edelboim, Esq. on behalf of Ross, Amsel, Raben and Nascimento, PLLC, 

morgan@elrolaw.com, eservice@elrolaw.com, tisha@elrolaw.com

Dana L. Kaplan, Esq. on behalf of Machinery Parts & Supplies, Inc. and Danilo Chavez, 

dana@kelleylawoffice.com, cassandra@kelleylawoffice.com; 

debbie@kelleylawoffice.com; craig@kelleylawoffice.com; 

kelleycr75945@notify.bestcase.com; scott@kelleylawoffice.com

Office of the US Trustee, USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

LAW OFFICE OF ADAM I. SKOLNIK, P.A.

/s/ Adam I. Skolnik

Via Certified U.S. Mail: None.

Via First Class U.S. Mail:

Gladys I. Manrique, 2334 SW 130th Terrace, Miramar, FL 33027

Via Electronic Mail:

Gladys I. Manrique, glirma27@yahoo.com

/s/ Adam I. Skolnik

ADAM I. SKOLNIK

Case 21-13844-PGH Doc 222 Filed 03/03/23 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: Judge E. Jeffrey PERILLOUX

NO. 2018-O-1083

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 2018

ORDER

Considering the motion for interim disqualification filed by Judge E. Jeffrey Perilloux, and the concurrence thereto by the Judiciary Commission of Louisiana,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judge E. Jeffrey Perilloux, Fortieth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. John the Baptist, State of Louisiana, be and he hereby is disqualified from exercising any judicial function during the pendency of further proceedings in this matter, pursuant to La. Const. art. V, § 25 (C) and Supreme Court Rule XXIII, § 27.

This order shall be effective immediately.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of ___________________, 2018.

*1285FOR THE COURT:

*/s/*

JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA