FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J ULY 29, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Nos . 10 -1 38 94 ; 1 0- 14 26 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 7- cr-2 08 97 -PCH-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff - App el le e, ve rs us MARIO ALBERTO SIM BAQUEBA BONILLA, a.k .a. Mari o S im

ba qu eb a, a.k .a. Mari o Gao na , a.k .a. Mari o S . Bon il la , a.k .a. Alb ert o Gao na , a.k .a. Mari o S im

ba , a.k .a. Mari o S im

ba qu eb a Bo ni ll a, a.k .a. Mari o B si m

ba qu eb a, a.k .a. Mari o C si m

ba qu eb a, a.k .a. Mari o P si m

ba qu eb a, a.k .a. Mari o B on il laSim

ba qu eb a, a.k .a. Mari o S si m

ba qu eb a, a.k .a. Mari o Al be rto Sim ba qu eb a, Defen da nt- App el lant .__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal s fr om

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Jul y 29 , 20 11 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, CARNES andPRYOR, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Mar io Alb ert o S im

ba qu eb a Bo ni ll a ch al le ng es forth e se co ndti m e h is co nv ic ti on s re late d t o h is parti ci pa ti on ina co ns pi racy to m is ap pr op ria te th e pe rs on al an d fi na nc ia l i nf orm at io n o f ot he r pe rs on s. Bo ni ll a p le ad edgu il ty to si xt eendi ffer en t cr im es rel at edto th e co ns pi racy. On ap pe al , th is Co urt af firm ed hi s co nv ic ti on s an d s en te nc es for on e co un t o f co ns pi racy, six co un ts of t raff ic ki ng inun au th or iz edacce ss de vi ces , andfiv e co un ts of a gg rav at edid en ti ty the ft, b ut we va cat edhi s fo urco nv ic ti on s an d s en te nc es forth e le ss er-i nc lu de d o ffen se of id en ti ty the ft. Un it edSta te s v . Bon il la , 57 9 F .3d12 33 (11 th Cir . 20 09 ). On rem an d, the di st ric t co urt i ss ue d an a m en de d ju dg m en t tha t o rd eredBo ni ll a to se rv e co nc urren t s en te nc es of 6 0 m on th s o f im pr is on m en t fo r hi s i de nt ity th eft cri m es . In thi s ap pe al , Bon il laarg ue s p ro se t ha t the di st ric t co urt fa il edto va cat e hi s fo urco nv ic ti on s fo r id en ti ty the ft, andth e Uni te d S tate s co nc ed es th aterro r. W e v acat e th e am en de d ju dg m en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt, an d we r em an d fo r th e 2di st ric t co urt t o c om pl y with o urearl ie r de ci si on . Bon il laals o app eal s the de ni al of hi s m ot io n t o d is m is s h is in di ctm en t, b utwe affi rm . The di stric t co urt d idno t ab us e it s d is cret io n b y de nyin g B on il la ’s m ot io n t o di sm is s. Bo ni ll a al le ge d tha t h e h adbe enpro se cu te d, i n v io la ti on of h is rig htto du e p ro ces s, fo r ha vi ng de frau de d an As si st an t Un it edSta te s At to rn ey , bu t Bo ni ll a ne ve r pr oduc edan y

ev id en ce o f an y

wron gd oi ng . As a g en eral rul e, a p le a o f gu il ty w ai ve s al l n on

juri sd ic ti on al de fect s i n the un de rlyin g p ro ceed in g. Id . at 12 40 . Thatis so be cau se “ a co un se le d p le a o f gu il ty is an admis si on of f actua l gu il t s o re li ab le th at , wher e v ol un tary an d i nt el li ge nt , itqu it e v al id ly rem ov es th e is su e o f fac tu al gu il t” an d p ro vi de s “ a su ffi ci en t b as is for th e . . . im

po si ti on of pu ni sh m en t.” M en nav. N.Y., 42 3 U.S. 6 1, 6 3 n .2, 9 6 S . Ct. 2 41 , 24 2 n .2 (1 97 5) . As a re su lt , “ [a] gu il ty ple a . . . sim pl y ren de rs irr el ev an t tho se co ns ti tu ti on al vi ol at io ns no t l og ic al ly inc on si st en t wi th th e v al idest ab li sh m en t o f fac tu al gu il t an d wh ic h d o n otst an d i n the way of c on vi ct io n i f fac tu al gu il t i s v al id ly es tabl is he d.” Id. Bo ni ll a fai le d t o e st ab li sh th atth e al le ge d c on fli ctof i nt eres t ha rb or edby the pro se cu to rs was “ lo gi cal ly inc on si st en t wi th . . . [h is ] factua l gu il t.” Id .; s ee al so Uni te d S ta te s v . Fai rch il d, 8 03 F.2d11 21 , 11 24 (11 th Cir . 19 86 ). Bo ni ll a adm it te d i n h is m ot io n t o d is m is s tha t h e d efraud edth e at to rn ey by

“ cap tu r[i ng ] [h is ] fin an ci al lo gi n i nf orm at io n” an d u si ng th at“ lo gi n i nf orm at io n t o 3m ak e m on ey tra ns fers be twee n . . . [hi s] ETRADE acco un ts an d [a n] acco un t i n BONILLA’ s n am e.” Bo ni ll a wai ve d the all eg ederro r by ple ad in g g ui lty . Bo ni ll a al so arg ue s, fo r th e fi rs t t im e o n app eal , abo utall eg edde fect s i n h is in di ctm en t, b utno erro r oc cu rred , pl ai n o r ot he rwis e. Bo ni ll a arg ue s tha t the fiv e co un ts of h is in di ctm en t tha t ch arg e ag gr av at edid en ti ty the ft f ai l t o a ll eg e th atth e cri m es affe ct edin te rs ta te co m m erce , bu t thi s o m is si on di d n otaffe ctth e juri sd ic ti on of t he di st ric t co urt t o a dju di cat e Bo ni ll a’s ch arg es . See Ali kh an i v . Uni te d S tate s, 2 00 F.3d73 2, 7 35 (11 th Cir . 20 00 ). Bo ni ll a wai ve d tha t no nju ris di ct io na l ar gu m en t b y pl ead in g g ui lty . See Un it edSta te s v . Bet an co urth , 55 4 F .3d13 29 , 13 32 (11 th Cir . 20 09 ). Bo ni ll a al so co m

pl ai ns , forth e fi rs t t im e o n app eal , abo utin effe ct iv e as si st an ce o f ap pe ll at e co un se l, b utbe cau se hi s u nd erl y in g arg um en ts lac k m eri t, co un se l ca nn otbe fau lt edforfai li ng to arg ue th em on di rectap pe al . See Owenv. Sec’y for Dep’t o f Co rr., 56 8 F .3d89 4, 9 15 (11 thCir . 20 09 ). Bo ni ll a wai ve d h is ch al le ng e to anall eg ed ly inc orrectdate inco un ts 7 an d 1 9 o f hi s i nd ic tm en t b y pl ead in g g ui lty , see Uni te d S ta te s v . McIn to sh , 58 0 F .3d12 22 , 12 28 (11 th Cir . 20 09 ), an d we c orrect edinhi s fi rs t ap pe al th e co ns ti tu ti on al erro r res ul ti ng fro m hi s co nv ic ti on s fo r bo th id en ti ty the ft a ndag gr av at edid en ti ty the ft, s ee Bo ni ll a, 57 9 F .3dat 1 24 3. 4Bo ni ll a al so arg ue s, fo r th e fi rs t t im e o n app eal , th athi s p le as of g ui ltwere

“un in te ll ig en tl y

an d unkno win gl y

en te red ” b ecau se th e d is tri ctco urt fa il edto co m pl y with F ed eral Ru le of C riminal Pro cedur e 1 1, b utBo ni ll a m ad e a s im il ar ch al le ng e to hi s g ui lty

pl eas inhi s fi rs t ap pe al . See Bo ni ll a, 57 9 F .3dat 1 23 9. He is barredfro m

ge tt in g “ two bi te s atth e sa m e ap pe ll at e ap pl e.” Uni te d S ta te s v . Fi al lo -J aco m e, 87 4 F .2d14 79 , 14 82 (11 th Cir . 19 89 ). W e AFFIRMth e d en ia l o f Bo ni ll a’s m ot io n t o d is m is s, an d we VACATE th e am en de d ju dg m en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt an d REMAND foritto co m pl y with ou r in st ru ct io ns to va cat e Bo ni ll a’s co nv ic ti on s an d s en te nc es forid en ti ty the ft.

5