alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.24**

 

**1ST CENTENNIAL BANK**

 

**AMENDMENT TOEXECUTIVE SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT**

 

**WHEREAS**,Timothy P. Walbridge (the “Executive”) entered into an Executive Salary Continuation Agreement with 1stCentennial Bank (formerly Redlands Centennial Bank) (the “Employer) dated August 1, 2001, (as amended March 6, 2002) (the “Agreement”); 

 

**WHEREAS**, the parties to the Agreement desire to amend Section 5.1 thereof; 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, the Employer and the Executive do hereby agree that Paragraph 5.1 of the Agreement shall be modifiedto read in full as follows: 

 

**“5.1 Termination in aSale of Business.** In the event there is a Sale of Business, the Employer shall take all actions necessary to ensure that such corporation or transferee is bound by the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that the employment of theExecutive is terminated (or “constructively terminated”) as a result of or with or within one (1) year following a Sale of Business, the Executive shall be one hundred percent (100%) vested in the Annual Benefit as described in subsection1.2 of this Agreement, except that the 3% increase referred to in Section 1.2 shall continue only until the Sale of Business rather than until the first payment is made. In such event, the Executive shall receive the Annual Benefit as described inthe preceding sentence, beginning at age 65, in equal installments in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, “constructive termination” shall include: (i) any decrease in salary or benefitsbelow those in effect for the Executive immediately prior to the Sale of Business, (ii) any demotion to a position below that of an executive officer, or (iii) any relocation of the Executive more than 25 miles from his or her principal place ofbusiness immediately prior to the Sale of Business. 

 

If theInternal Revenue Service or any other tax authority makes any claim, demand or assessment in any form based directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, on the allegation that any payment under this Agreement and/or other payment by Employer to orfor the benefit of the Executive at any time constitutes a “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code or any similar or successor provision of federal or state law, Employer and Executive agree that Employer, its successors and/orassigns shall reimburse Executive for any monies paid in satisfaction of such claim, demand or assessment. 

 

In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as written. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment this 27th day of April 2004. 

 
**1st Centennial Bank**
By
 
/s/ Patrick J. Meyer

By
 
Patrick J. Meyer
  
Chairman of the Board

 

/s/ Timothy P. Walbridge

Timothy P. Walbridge

Employee
Christopher P. MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-45

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Order entered June 6, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00954
- CV
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE R UTH BAKER

AND GREGORY JOSEPH F INSTER
On Appeal fro m the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 17
- 13669



### O RDER By letter dated May 17, 2019, the Court instructed appellant to file an amended brief correcting noted deficiencies. Appellant sought clarification and the Court responded by letter dated June 3, 2019. To date, appellant has not filed his amended brief. We ORDER appellant to file his amended brief by June 17, 2019

. Before the Court is appellee’s June 4, 2019 motion seeking an extension of time to file
her b rief until thirty days after appellant files his amended brief. We GRANT the motion to the
extent that a ppellee shall file her brief by July 17, 2019

. /s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2020

t0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2020

160961

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160961

COA: 351868

Alcona CC: 19-003159-FH

CHAD LEE CRANDALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2020 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**FERPA’s Annual Notification of Rights Requirement (34 CFR § 99.7)**

There are approximately

20,629 school districts and postsecondary institutions affected b y the annual notification of rights requirement in FERPA (34 CFR § 99.7). We estimate that an averag e of .25 hours (15 minutes) per response is required for the annual notification of rights requirement. From administrative experience, we have determined that, at the elementary /secondary

level, school districts (as opposed to individual schools) are the entities that ty pically issue the annual notification of FERPA rights. At the postsecondary level, it is the individual institutions that issue the notice. Following is a breakdown of school districts and postsecondary institutions:

No. School Distric ts: 14,166 Burden Hours: x .25 Total Burden Hours = 3,542 No. Postsec. Inst.: 6,463 Burden Hours: x .25 Total Burden Hours = 1,616 School District Burden Hours: 3,542 Postsec. I nst. Burden Hours: + 1,616 Grand Tot al Burden Hours: 5,158 Since most agencies and institutions met major requirements during the early ye ars after FERPA’s passage in 1974 and after publication of the revised regulations in 1988, the y ear - to

- year cost is minimal.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 34927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service


Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grant Program

Correction

    In notice document 96-16321 appearing on page 33639 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 27, 1996, make the following corrections:
    On page 33639, in the third column, in the sixth line, between 
``Virginia,'' and ``Puerto Rico'' insert ``West Virginia''.
    On the same page, in the same column, in the first full paragraph, 
in the fourth line, ``(202) 205-3934'' should read ``(202) 205-2924''.
    On the same page, in the same column, in the second paragraph, in 
the fourth line, ``(292( 205-2921'' should read ``(202) 205-2921''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 1, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 46511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-27]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Ottumwa, IA

Correction

    In rule document 98-22172, beginning on page 44127, in the issue of 
Tuesday, August 18, 1998, make the following correction.


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 44128, in the first column, under ACE IA E2  Ottumwa, IA  
[Revised], in the fourth line, ``(lat. 41 deg.01'45''N., long 
92 deg.14'33''W.)'' should read ``(lat. 41 deg.01'45''N., long 
92 deg.19'33''W.)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### Figure Page 1 of 3 **FIGURE** Photographs of Mollusk Dredge Samples Collected d uring the Fall 2010 Jacksonville Survey

JAX - Fa10 - S02 - CLA-A JAX - Fa10 - S04 - CLA-A JAX - Fa10 - S08 - CLA - B

JAX - Fa10 - S02 - CLA-A (sorted) JAX - Fa10 - S04 - CLA -A (sorted) JAX - Fa10 - S08 - CLA - B (sorted)

### Figure Page 2 of 3 **F IGURE**  **( continued** 

**)** Photographs of Mollusk Dredge Samples Collected during the Fall 2010 Jacksonville Survey

JAX - Fa10 - S12 - CLA-A JAX - Fa10 - S13 - CAL -A JAX - Fa10 - N02 - CLA -A

JAX - Fa10 - S12 - CLA-A (sorted) JAX - Fa10 - S13 - CLA -A (sorted) (Photo Not Taken )

JAX - Fa10 - N02 - CLA -A (sorted)

### Figure Page 3 of 3 **F IGURE**  **( continued** 

**)** Photographs of Mollusk Dredge Samples Collected during the Fall 2010 Jacksonville Survey

JAX - Fa10 - N04 - CLA- B JAX - Fa10 - N06 - CLA-A JAX - Fa10 - N08 - CLA -A

(Photo Not Taken)

JAX - Fa10 - N04 - CLA- B (sorted) (Photo Not Taken)

JAX - Fa10 - N06 - CLA-A (sorted) (Photo Not Taken)

JAX - Fa10 - N0 8 - CLA -A (sorted)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Users as essential contributors to spatial cyberinfrastructures      

      January 1, 2011    

Current accounts of spatial cyberinfrastructure development tend to overemphasize technologies to the neglect of critical social and cultural issues on which adoption depends. Spatial cyberinfrastructures will have a higher chance of success if users of many types, including nonprofessionals, are made central to the development process. Recent studies in the history of infrastructures reveal key turning points and issues that should be considered in the development of spatial cyberinfrastructure projects. These studies highlight the importance of adopting qualitative research methods to learn how users work with data and digital tools, and how user communities form. The author's empirical research on data sharing networks in the Pacific Northwest salmon crisis at the turn of the 21st century demonstrates that ordinary citizens can contribute critical local knowledge to global databases and should be considered in the design and construction of spatial cyberinfrastructures.

## Citation Information
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel
Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      May 13, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Samuel ShengSamuel
      ShengChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial and accounting officer)
Johnny Willis MILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Relationships among sea-floor structure and benthic communities in Long Island Sound at regional and benthoscape scales      

      September 30, 2000    

Long Island Sound is comprised of a rich and spatially heterogeneous mix of sea-floor environments which provide habitat for an equally diverse set of assemblages of soft-sediment communities. Information from recent research on the geomorphological and chemical attributes of these environments, as well as from studies of the hydrodynamics of the Sound, provide the opportunity to develop a landscape, or "benthoscape" framework for understanding the soft-sediment ecology of this estuary and for guiding future research focusing on structure and function at multiple spatial scales. This contribution reviews past research on benthic communities in Long Island Sound and addresses how they may be shaped by sea-floor characteristics at regional and benthoscape scales. At the regional scale (i.e. the entire Sound), differences in benthic community composition correspond to the distribution of general sedimentary environments. However, significant variation in community structure also occurs at the benthoscape scale (within regions) related to local variations in sediment properties, and physical and biogenic topographic features. Several topical areas in particular need further research in Long Island Sound, including temporal dynamics of benthic communities relative to sea-floor structure and the interaction between the dynamics of benthoscapes and hydrologic seascapes.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Long Island Sound
                  - Connecticut
                  -  New York

View All **
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2020

No. 04-20-00080-CV

Rosanna Barrera, Jenesey Barrera and Sage Barrera,

Appellants

v.

Dean CHERER & Chererco LLC,

Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-1394-CV-A

Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Neither the clerk’s nor reporter’s records have been filed in this appeal. 

On February 6, 2020, appellants Rosana Barrera, Jenesey Barrera, and Sage Barrera filed 

a notice of appeal complaining of the trial court’s November 8, 2019 order. On February 6, 

2020, Jenesey Barrera filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs. 

However, neither Rosana Barrera nor Sage Barrera filed a statement.

If Appellants wish to proceed without payment of court costs, appellants Rosana Barrera 

and Sage Barrera must file in this court a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court 

Costs within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c); TEX. R. CIV. P.

145(b), (e). A copy of the statement is attached.

We respectfully advise the Guadalupe County District Clerk and court reporter Patricia 

Wagner that, to require Appellants to pay costs notwithstanding a properly filed statement, the 

movant must file a motion that complies with Rule 145(f). See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(f)(1) (district 

clerk); id. R. 145(f)(3) (court reporter). A notification of late record does not meet Rule 145(f)’s 

requirements.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
Scott Christopher HAHN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2332

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Donald KASISCHKE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-78

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Terry ADKISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Educational Resources 

#           Exploring Maps      

      By Educational Resources

-  Home 
-  Ecosystems 
-  Geography 
-  Geology 
-  Global Change 
-  Natural Hazards 
-  Oceans and Coasts 
-  Solar System 
-  Water Resources 
-  USGS Data in Schools 
-  Adventures in STEM 
-  Multimedia 
-  Connect 

*Exploring Maps* is an interdisciplinary set of materials on mapping for grades 7-12. Students will learn basic mapmaking and map-reading skills and will see how maps can answer fundamental geographic questions. The map images and activities in this packet can be used in various courses, including geography, history, math, art, English, and the sciences.   

                            -  Exploring Maps — Teaching Guide (64 KB) 
                            -  Exploring Maps - Poster Side 1 (1.39 MB) 
                            -  Exploring Maps - Poster Side 2 (936 KB)
Reader’s Guide for Gamma-Cyhalothrin CRM: Wilhelmena Livingston

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Gamma-Cyhalothr in Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0479

Publication Date: December 22, 2010

EPA has created this document to provid e an organizational structure to the Registration Review Gamma-Cyhalothrin Dock et for Public Comments. The docket index groups related documents. The first group contains the Fe deral Register and Docket Organizational Documents, the second group contains the Human Health Assessment, the third group contains the Environmental Risk Assessment document, and the fourth group contains use/usage informa tion and a review of human incidents. The Agency is providing the “Reader’s Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various items contained in the Gamma-Cyhalothrin docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Lambda-Cyhalothrin and Gamma- Cyhalothrin Registration Review

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Gamma-Cyhalothrin Docket # EPA-HQ-

OPP-2010-0479

Docket Item 3. Lambda-Cyhalothrin and Gamma-Cyhalothrin Summary

Document

Human Health Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 4. Lambda-Cyhalothrin and Gamma- Cyhalothrin. Human Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review (September 28, 2010)

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to s upport the registration review of the non-systemic pyrethroid insecticides lambda-cyhalothr in and gamma-cyhalothrin.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 5. EFED Registration Review Problem Formulation for Lambda- Cyhalothrin and Gamma-Cyhalothrin (November 22, 2010)This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and characterizing the ecological risks.

Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. PRD Appendix A Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non Feed Uses Considered in Registra tion Review Work Planning. Gamma-Cyhalothrin (128807). (March 4, 2009)

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/ non- feed uses for Gamma-Cyhalothrin.

Docket Item 7. Gamma-Cyhalothrin (128807) Screen ing Level Usage Analysis (SLUA) (January 25, 2010)

This document provides the available estimates of pesticide usage data for Gamma-Cyhalothrin that is used on agri cultural crops in the United States.

Docket Item 8. BEAD Chemical Profile for Regi stration Review: Gamma- cyhalothrin (December 9, 2010)

The purpose of this document is to convey usage information and a broad overview of the pest management roles of pesticides that are beginning to undergo registration review.

Incident Report

Docket Item 9. Gamma-Cyhalothrin Revi ew of Human Incidents (August 24, 2010)

This report represents poisoning incidents occurring in the United States for GammaCyhalothrin.
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATIONS I, Kjell I. Jagelid, hereby certify that: (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the report) of Simex Technologies, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Omitted] (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: November 27, 2007/s/ Kjell I. JagelidKjell I. Jagelid