alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 3

Emission Inventory Requirements for the

Northern and Southern New Jersey

PM2.5 Redesignation/Maintenance Plan Demonstration 

Checklist
2

Emission Inventory Requirements for 

PM2.5 Redesignation/Maintenance Plan Demonstration Checklist

A. PM2.5 Attainment Year Inventory Requirements

1. Select a calendar year which shows violation-free data and develop an emissions 

inventory based on that year for the PM2.5 nonattainment area. This is considered as 

the attainment year inventory.

Yes, see Section 1 of EPA’s TSD, NJDEP submitted 2007 inventory which will be 

used as a surrogate inventory for the 2008 inventory.

2. Emissions are based on annual emissions for annual PM2.5, SO2, NOx, NH3** and 

VOC**.

Yes, the SIP includes PM2.5, SO2 and NOx emissions. VOC and NH3 emissions 

are NOT required because these pollutants are NOT considered to have 

significant impact in causing PM2.5 nonattainment. 

3. Provide an explanation on how the point, area, nonroad mobile and onroad mobile 

source inventory are developed.

Yes, for the 2007 Attainment Year Inventory see Section 1 of EPA’s TSD.

B. Projection Inventory and PM2.5 Maintenance Plan Demonstration Requirements

1. Emissions should be projected from the attainment year to at least 10 years into the 

future. Provide summary of controlled emissions for point, area, nonroad and onroad 

mobile sources . This is the endpoint/10-year inventory.

Yes, this information was provided for the end year inventory 2025. See Section 

2.

2. At a minimum, emissions should be projected to a midpoint year between the 

attainment year and the endpoint/10-year inventory. This is the interim 

inventory. Provide summary of controlled emissions for point, area, nonroad and 

onroad mobile sources for the PM2.5 nonattainment area for the interim year 

inventory.

Yes, see Section 2 of EPA’s TSD.

3. State must provide a demonstration which shows that the interim and 10-year projected 

inventory emissions (with future controls) will not exceed the attainment inventory 
3

emission levels. Provide summary of emissions for 10-year projected and interim year

point, area, nonroad mobile and onroad mobile sources.

Yes, see Section 2 of EPA’s TSD.

4. Provide an explanation on how the point, area, nonroad mobile and onroad mobile 

source projection inventories are developed.

Yes, see Section 2 of EPA’s TSD. 

5. If the endpoint/10-year projected and interim year inventory emissions are lower than 

the attainment year inventory, the State must show the total emission credits the control 

program that will reduce emissions from the attainment year level to a level that is 

below the attainment inventory level. 

Yes, section Section 2 of EPA’s TSD.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 3032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 630

RIN 3206-AE95

Absence and Leave; Sick Leave

Correction

    In rule document 94-29820 beginning on page 62266, in the issue of 
Friday, December 2, 1994, make the following corrections:

Sec. 630.403   [Corrected]

    On page 62271, in the second column, the amendatory instructions 
for Sec. 630.403 was omitted and should read ``5. Section 630.403 is 
revised to read as follows:'' and the section heading should read:

Sec. 630.403   Supporting evidence.

* * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Venus: Atmospheric motion and structure from Mariner 10 pictures      

      January 1, 1974    

The Mariner 10 television cameras imaged the planet Venus in the visible and near ultraviolet for a period of 8 days at resolutions ranging from 100 meters to 130 kilometers. The general pattern of the atmospheric circulation in the upper tropospheric/lower stratospheric region is displayed in the pictures. Atmospheric flow is symmetrical between north and south hemispheres. The equatorial motions are zonal (east-west) at approximately 100 meters per second, consistent with the previously inferred 4-day retrograde rotation. Angular velocity increases with latitude. The subsolar region, and the region downwind from it, show evidence of large-scale convection that persists in spite of the main zonal motion. Dynamical interaction between the zonal motion and the relatively stationary region of convection is evidenced by bowlike waves.

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 29061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 252

[Defense Acquisition Circular 91-13]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Miscellaneous 
Amendments

Correction

    In rule document 98-5272 beginning on page 11522, in the issue of 
Monday, March 9, 1998, make the following correction:


252.225-7021  [Corrected]

    On page 11545, in the third column, in section 252.225-
7021(a)(5)(i), in the second line, after ``country;'' insert ``or (ii) 
In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of 
materials from another country or instrumentality, has been 
substanially transformed in a designated country''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10803]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 148 / Friday, August 3, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 41323]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 997

[Docket Nos. FV97-997-1 FIR and FV97-998-1-FIR]


Peanuts Marketed in the United States; Relaxation of Handling 
Regulations

Correction

    In rule document 98-16259 beginning on page 33237, in the issue of 
Thursday, June 18, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 33243, in the table, under the heading ``Sound split and 
broken kernels'', in the first line ``300 %'' should read ``3.00 %''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### Douglas Miller, an Infant by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Joan Miller, et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Jay E. Cross, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Orange County,

November 20, 1973.

*Michael A. Gurda*for plaintiffs. *Vandervoort, Cline <& MacVean*for defendant.

John W. Sweeny, J.

This is another one of the legion of questions raised at the Special Term and trial level by *Dole*v. *Dow Chem. Co.*(30 N Y 2d 143) but as yet not definitively answered by the appellate courts.

Plaintiff has moved to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim for indemnification asserted against the plaintiff parent of the seven year, eight-month-old infant plaintiff who was injured while playing on a public street. The counterclaim is alleged in one broad sweeping allegation that there was lack of parental supervision and instruction.

If a child is alleged to have been four years old or below at the time of the accident and therefore *non sui juris*as a matter of law, the age of the child is in and of itself a special circumstance which creates a special responsibility for a parent to supervise and therefore also creates a recognizable cause of *941action over against the parent under *Dole*v. *Dow Chem. Co. (supra).*

However, it is this court’s opinion that no causé of action is stated in a counterclaim against a parent of a child which is *not non sui juris*as a matter of law when that pleading only vaguely alleges lack of parental supervision. To permit such an automatic counterclaim without allegations of what special circumstances existed which imposed a special responsibility upon the parent of a child who is over four years of age would be to invite the flood of pleadings predicted by the court in *Fake*v. *Terminal Hardware*(73 Misc 2d 39) and *Marrero*v. *Just Cab Corp.*(71 Misc 2d 474). The ultimate result would be a situation where every parent would have to defend the supervision of his child in every street accident merely because the child was unattended (cf. *Collazo*v. *Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*72 Misc 2d 946).

Accordingly, since we are dealing here with a child who is not as a matter of law *non sui juris*(cf. *Torres*v. *Vizzare,*32 A D 2d 663), no cause of action has been stated in the counterclaim as it presently stands and it is therefore dismissed.

Defendant is granted leave to serve, within 30 days of the date hereof, an amended answer setting forth whatever special circumstances allegedly existed which would have created a special responsibility to supervise this infant plaintiff at the time of the accident.
Case 21-11494-SMG    Doc 16    Filed 02/23/21    Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-120314]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Proposed Changes to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 
Rles

Correction

    In notice document 95-1879 beginning on page 4893 in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 25, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 4895, in the first column, under DATES, in the last line, 
``February 24, 1995.'' should read ``March 27, 1995.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 10.8


 


I-AM Capital Acquisition Company

1345 Avenue of the Americas


New York, New York 10105


 


_________, 2017


 


I-AM Capital Partners LLC


1345 Avenue of the Americas


New York, New York 10105


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of I-AM Capital Acquisition Company (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier
of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case
as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
I-AM Capital Partners LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may
be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105 (or any successor
location). In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay I-AM Capital Partners LLC the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective
Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. I-AM Capital Partners LLC hereby agrees that it does not have
any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO as a result of this letter agreement (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, this letter agreement and will not seek
recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	I-AM CAPITAL ACQUISITION COMPANY
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name: 
	 	 	Title:  


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


	I-AM CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name: 	 
	 	Title:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Medical Staffing
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date November 1, 2005                   By:    /s/ Brajnandan B. Sahay
                                               ---------------------------------
                                        Name:  Brajnandan B. Sahay
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer/
                                               Principal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medical Staffing
Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Medical Staffing Solutions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 EXHIBIT 32.1-1
(LOGO) CHASE

Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH 43219
1-800-848-9136 Customer Service
1-800-582-0542 TDD / Text Telephone

Mr. Andy Rosenfeld
JP Morgan/Church
c/o Norwest Bank of Minnesota/Master Servicing Division
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044


RE: Annual Certification

Dear Mr. Rosenfeld:

Pursuant to the servicing  agreement,  the undersigned  Officer certifies to the
following:

a) All hazard or mortgage  impairment,  (if applicable)  flood or other casualty
   insurance and primary mortgage guaranty  insurance  premiums,  taxes,  ground
   rents, assessments and other changes have been paid by/in connection with the
   Mortgaged Properties;

b) All property inspections have been completed;

c) Compliance relative to Adjustable Rate Mortgages have been met;

d) Compliance with IRS Foreclosure  reporting regulations enacted as IRS Section
   6060J by the Deficit  Reduction Act,  regarding  Acquired and/or  Abandonment
   property have been completed;

e) All loans CMMC  services  in state that have  statutes  requiring  payment of
   interest on escrow/impound accounts have been completed;

f) That such  officer  has  confirmed  that the  Fidelity  Bond,  the Errors and
   Omissions  Insurance Policy,  and any other bonds required under the terms of
   the Servicing Agreement are in full force and effect.

g) Enclosed is a copy of our most recent independent audit statement.


CERTIFIED BY:                     DATE: March 31,2000
Lucy P.Gambino
Vice President
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH 43219



S:/rishare/offcert.doc
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80126]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35085; File No. SR-NYSE-94-41]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
Change and Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change by the New York 
Stock Exchange, Inc., Relating to the Establishment of Uniform Listing 
and Trading Guidelines for Stock Index and Currency Warrants

Correction

    In notice document 94-31205 beginning on page 65552, in the issue 
of Tuesday, December 20, 1994, make the following correction:
    On page 65553, in the third column, before the FR document line, 
the signature line was omitted and should have appeared as follows:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 16, 2004
KINGDOM COVENANT BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0040

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
David Michael LYON, Jr. v. Billy MCGEE

2016-CT-00637-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 29, 2018 Closed: August 2, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: December 1981      

      January 1, 1981    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Robert Elliot and Marvin Mack, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Criminal Term, Kings County,

October 29, 1973.

*Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Barry Gene Rhodes*of counsel), for plaintiff. *William Gallagher*and *Robert Baum*for defendants.

*755Vito J. Titohe, J.

Motion by the People for reargument is granted, and after careful consideration, the court adheres to its original decision (74 Misc 2d 974). With respect to the prosecutor’s inquiry as to the scope of the original decision, the court believes that it clearly and unequivocally held therein that the defendant is not only entitled to a list of the People’s contra alibi witnesses who may testify in rebuttal to the defendant’s alibi witnesses, but is also entitled to a list of contra alibi witnesses who may testify on the People’s direct case.

Despite fears expressed by the prosecutor, the court is unable to perceive any material disadvanatage that the People would suffer, should a defendant, after being furnished with a contra alibi witness list of those persons who are to testify on the People’s direct case, then fail to call any of his alibi witnesses at the trial.

The court is aware of the recent case *(People*v. *Haynesworth,*75 Misc 2d 75), wherein it was likewise held that the “notice of alibi” statute (CPL 250.20) is defective, in that it lacks reciprocal rights of discovery for defendants in alibi cases, contrary to the rule promulgated in *Wardius*v. *Oregon*(412 U. S. 470). However, in *Haynesworth,*the People were precluded from presenting testimony at the trial relating to alibi defense, whereas in the instant case, this court directed the People to furnish a list of the names and addresses of contra alibi witnesses to the defense five days prior to trial.

This court believes the latter procedure to be preferable in these matters. Preclusion is a drastic method of procedure and one which should be employed only as a last resort. It is punitive and suppressive in nature, the antithesis of “discovery”, and hardly the most satisfactory procedure to be utilized in any quest for truth.

Furthermore, this court is of the opinion that the statutory scheme of requiring a defendant to furnish the People with a list of alibi witnesses prior to trial, is not invalid per se, but merely inadequate because it does not afford a defendant reciprocal discovery rights when he intends to interpose an alibi defense. In permitting the People to furnish a list of contra alibi witnesses prior to trial, this court believes, that in accordance with the decision in *Wardius*v. *Oregon (supra),*it has provided the requisite procedural mechanism to accomplish the goal of reciprocal discovery in alibi cases.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 22 (Thursday, February 1, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10201]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 1996 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 3539]]

ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

1 CFR Chapter III

Removal of CFR Chapter

    Effective February 1, 1996, the Administrative Conference of the 
United States (ACUS) is terminated by Public Law 104-52, 104 Stat. 480 
(see 5 U.S.C. note preceding 591). Therefore, the Office of the Federal 
Register is removing ACUS regulations from the Code of Federal 
Regulations pursuant to its authority to maintain an orderly system of 
codification under 44 U.S.C. 1510 and 1 CFR part 8.
    Accordingly, 1 CFR is amended by removing parts 301 through 326 and 
vacating Chapter III.
BILLING CODE 1505-1D-M
```