alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5179-8]


Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement; Lorentz Barrel and 
Drum Superfund Site

Correction

    In notice document 95-7592 beginning on page 16135, in the issue of 
Wednesday, March 29, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1.On page 16135, in the second column, under SUMMARY:, in the first 
full paragraph, in the third line, ``part'' should read ``past''.
    2.On page 16136, in the 1st column, under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION:, in the 20th line from the top, ``Van'' should read 
``Varn''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Summary of Creepmeter Data from 1980 to 2020—Measurements Spanning the Hayward, Calaveras, and San Andreas Faults in Northern and Central California              

      March 18, 2024    

View Report

This report is an update to the presentation by Schulz (1989) introducing potential users to the creepmeter data collected between the publication of Schulz’s report and mid-2020. The creepmeter network monitors aseismic, surface slip at various locations on the Hayward, Calaveras, and San Andreas Faults in northern and central California. There are different designs of creepmeters and these are briefly described. For a majority of the creepmeters, these data are automatically sent to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) offices where they are stored and processed. In addition, for most of the creepmeters, occasional manual measurements are made and these are compared with digitally recorded data. For some sites, the comparisons indicated degradation of the electronic sensor and consequently corrections are made to the digital data. The largest transient deformation is that which followed the 2004, M6, Parkfield earthquake. Various functions found in the literature that have been used to model postseismic slip were tested with the observed postseismic behavior seen on the creepmeters in the vicinity of Parkfield, California. No single function adequately fit all the data from these Parkfield instruments. This report is a discussion and analysis of data from creepmeters deployed by the USGS. The discussion primarily focuses on instruments that are currently operating in 2020 or have operated quite recently but are no longer in service.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Todd Ericksen

##### Geodetic Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

tericksen@usgs.gov

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Todd EricksenGeodetic EngineerEarthquake Hazards ProgramEmailtericksen@usgs.gov 

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10212]



      

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 29 / Monday, February 12, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 5445]]


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Third Annual National Security Education Program (NSEP) 
Institutional Grants Competition

Correction

    In notice document 96-231 appearing on page 643 in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 9, 1996, make the following correction:
    In the second column, under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, the seventh line should read <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7979794989b9b9e9285b799849287d987989b9e948ed9988493d99a9e9b">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0838f8c8c898592a08e938590ce908f8c898399ce8f9384ce8d898c">[email protected]</span></a>.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 68 (Monday, April 8, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20408]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

45 CFR Part 74

RIN 0991-AA56


Uniform Administrative Requirements for Awards and Subawards to 
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, Other Non-Profit 
Organizations, and Commercial Organizations; and Certain Grants and 
Agreements With States, Local Governments and Indian Tribal Governments

Correction

    In rule document 96-6878 beginning on page 11743 in the issue of 
Friday, March 22, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 74.26   [Corrected]

    On page 11747, in the first column, Sec. 74.26(d)(2), in lines 11 
and 12, remove phrase ``a computer disk containing the entire contents 
of the audit report''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FRITZ ALISME

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 413

[ April 30, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrew L. Siegel

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09

- 022392 CF10A

.

Fritz Alisme, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and K LI NGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 10, 2001 Session ALVIN BATES v. D R. JOSEPH METC ALF, IV, d/b/a OA K RIDGE SURGEONS, P.C. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anderson County No. 98LA0448 Hon. James B. Scott, Jr., Judge

FILED DECEMBER 3, 2001 No. E2001-00358-COA-R3-CV

CONCURR

ING OP INION

I concur with the result reached by Judge Goddard in this case. Judge Susano has file d an able Dissent on the issue of medical battery . I do not agree with the Dissent, because I believe Dr. Metc alf prop erly testifie d about te

lling pla in tiff that whatever he found under the examination, if it could

be fixed, h

e would fix it. The record establishes that plaintiff knew an anal fissure was possible, and Dr. Metcalf testified that plaintiff expected him to fix it if it was found.

The parol evidence rule does not bar th is testimon

y, b ecause

the written request for surgery form sets forth that unforeseen conditions could require additional s urgery , and the form explicitly authorize d such sur

gery to be per formed. In or

der for the paro l evidenc e rule

to ap pl y, the written agree

ment mu st be intended by the pa rties to be a final expression of their agreement a nd intended to be a co mplete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreeme nt. I cannot

find that intentfrom the r

equest f or surg ery form, and th e a

bovementioned provision is subject to be explained and supplemented by or

al evidence. See Stric

kland v. C

ity of Lawre nceburg , 611 S.W.2d 832.

_________________________ H ERSCHEL P ICKENS F RANKS , J.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 14972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10328]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 14972]]



DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Correction

    In notice document 97-6147, beginning on page 11477, in the issue 
of Wednesday, March 12, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 11477, in the third column, in the DATES: entry, in the 
fourth line, ``April 11, 1997'' should read ``May 12, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Control Option

Annual

Emission 

Rate

(lb/MMBTu)

Percent

Reduction

(%)

Annual

Emissions

(tons)

Emission 

Reduction

(tons)

Baseline 0.171 NA 5347 NA

SNCR+SOFA 0.150 25.0% 4011 1336

SCR+SOFA 0.050 70.7% 1567 3780

Notes:

(1) Baseline emissions are from CAMD, 2010.

Colstrip 4 NOx Emissions Summary
Gustavo MOZO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0092

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(formerly Clamshell Enterprises, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ivan Bial, Principle Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Ivan Bial
Ivan Bial
Director, Secretary and
Principle Financial Officer


November 10, 2003
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133294 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RICK BEAVERS, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 133294 

 COA: 269007 
 Wayne CC: 03-309389-NO

BARTON MALOW COMPANY, JOMAR 

BUILDING COMPANY, INC., SPILLIS 

CARDELLA, DMJM, a/k/a DMJA, INC.,

and ROBERT SMITH,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether, in light of MCR 

7.205(F)(3), the following cases were properly decided: Riza v Niagara Machine & Tool 

Works, Inc, 411 Mich 915 (1980); and People v Kincade (On Remand), 206 Mich App 

477 (1994). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this 

order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

s0710 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 13, 2007 

Clerk
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4928 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to amend the requirement that interstate firearms sales by Federal firearms licensees be 

made in accordance with the State law where the transaction occurs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2016 

Mr. GUINTA (for himself, Mr. BRAT, Mr. BARR, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. 

FINCHER, Mr. SALMON, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. 

BOST, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. EMMER of Minnesota, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. STIVERS, 

and Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

amend the requirement that interstate firearms sales by 

Federal firearms licensees be made in accordance with 

the State law where the transaction occurs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearms Transfer Im5 provement Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4928 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF REQUIREMENT THAT INTERSTATE 

2 FIREARMS SALES BY FEDERAL FIREARMS LI3 CENSEES BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 

4 THE STATE LAW WHERE THE TRANSACTION 

5 OCCURS. 

6 Section 922(b)(3)(A) of title 18, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘rifle or shotgun’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘firearm’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘both such States’’ and insert11 ing ‘‘the State in which the licensee’s place of busi12 ness is located’’; and 

13 (3) by striking ‘‘both States’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘the State in which the licensee’s place of business 

15 is located’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Norman SHERMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    292,845,626
<SECURITIES>                               37,592,275
<RECEIVABLES>                              14,684,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                4,449,586
<INVENTORY>                                 1,694,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          346,380,587
<PP&E>                                     62,626,610
<DEPRECIATION>                              6,827,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            677,757,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      23,793,109
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      135,083
<OTHER-SE>                                626,645,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              677,757,823
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           31,000,064
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              27,071,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          178,874,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            3,395,104
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,974,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (212,770,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (212,770,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                            (212,770,825)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.68)


</TABLE>
Cheryl Beth BUDESA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
115530514.v1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: Chapter 11 

It’Sugar FL I LLC, et al., Case No. 20-20259-RAM 

(Jointly Administered) 

Debtors. 

/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Fox Rothschild LLP and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP hereby enter their appearance 

as co-counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the above-captioned jointly 

administered cases. Undersigned counsel respectfully request that copies of all future notices, 

pleadings and orders served and/or filed in the above-styled and numbered cause be served upon 

the following: 

Heather L. Ries, Esquire 

Michael J. Viscount, Jr., Esquire 

Michael R. Herz, Esquire 

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 

777 South Flagler Drive 

Suite 1700 West Tower 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Tel: (561) 835-9600 

Fax: (561) 835-9602 

hries@foxrothschild.com

mviscount@foxrothschild.com

mherz@foxrothschild.com

Bradford J. Sandler, Esquire 

Paul J. Labov, Esquire 

Steven W. Golden, Esquire 

Hayley R. Winograd, Esquire 

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES 

LLP 

780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor 

New York, NY 10017-2024 

Tel: (212) 561-7700 

Fax: (212) 561-7777 

bsandler@pszjlaw.com

plabov@pszjlaw.com

sgolden@pszjlaw.com

hwinograd@pszjlaw.com

(signature page follows) 

Case 20-20259-RAM Doc 123 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2
2

115530514.v1 

Dated: October 27, 2020 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 

777 South Flagler Drive 

Suite 1700 West Tower 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Tel: (561) 835-9600 

Fax: (561) 835-9602 

By: /s/ Heather L. Ries 

Heather L. Ries 

Florida Bar No. 581933 

Michael J. Viscount, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice 

pending) 

Michael R. Herz (Pro Hac Vice Pending) 

hries@foxrothschild.com

mviscount@foxrothschild.com

mherz@foxrothschild.com

and 

PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES 

LLP 

780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor 

New York, NY 10017-2024 

Tel: (212) 561-7700 

Fax: (212) 561-7777 

Bradford J. Sandler (Pro Hac Vice pending) 

Paul J. Labov (Pro Hac Vice pending) 

Steven W. Golden, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice 

pending)

Hayley R. Winograd, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice 

pending)

bsandler@pszjlaw.com

plabov@pszjlaw.com

sgolden@pszjlaw.com

hwinograd@pszjlaw.com

Proposed Co-Counsel to the Official 

Committee of Unsecured Creditors

Case 20-20259-RAM Doc 123 Filed 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 11, 2014

N o. 04

- 11

- 00877

- CR

Antonio AVILES

, Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cour t No. 2011CR7244 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On January 13, 2014, the United States Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment and

remanded the matter back to this court “for further considerati o n in light of Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. __ (2013).” Accordingly, the parties may file amended briefs on the issue presented , and we note that amended briefs are encouraged by this court . Any amended briefs must contain argument as directed by the United States Supreme Court, i.e., whether the trial court erred in denying t he motion to suppress in light of the Court’s decision in Missouri v. McNeely . We ORDER appellant Antonio Aviles to file his amended brief, if any, in this court

on or before March 13, 2014 . The State’s amended brief will be due in t his court thirty (30) days after the date appellant’s amended brief is filed in this court. If either party chooses not to file an amended brief, that party is ORDERED to notify this court of such fact in writing on or

before February 21, 2014

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on appellant and all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           U.S. Geological Survey ground-water studies in Pennsylvania      

      January 1, 1988    

View Document

In Pennsylvania, large water demands generally are met from surface-water sources; small water demands generally are met from ground-water sources. Ground-water sources supply 6 percent of the total water used in Pennsylvania. Of the ground water used in 1984,55 percent was for industry, 23 percent for public supply, 15 percent for rural domestic supplies, 5 percent for livestock, and 2 percent for irrigation. Public supplies provide ground water to about 2,180,000 people, and rural self-supplied systems provide ground water to about 3,000,000 people.  The major issues related to ground water in Pennsylvania are: Adequacy of supplies, Contamination by hazardous wastes, and Effects of coal mining, oil and gas production, and agriculture.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pennsylvania Water Science Center          

215 Limekiln RoadNew Cumberland, PA17070United States

717-730-6900 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pennsylvania

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-70919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Parts 234, 242 and 252 [DFARS Case 96-D024]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Earned Value 
Management Systems

Correction

    In final rule document 97-5362, beginning on page 9990, in the 
issue of Wednesday, March 5, 1997, make the following corrections:


234.005-71  [Corrected]

    (1) On page 9991, in the second column, in 234.005-71(b), in the 
second line ``Systems'' should read ``System''.
    (2) On the same page, in the third column:


242.1107-70  [Corrected]

    (a) The section heading number should read as set forth above.
    (b) In 242.1107-70(a), in the fourth line ``cost-schedule'' should 
read ``cost/schedule''.


252.234-7000  [Corrected]

    (a) In 252.234-7000(a), in the sixth line ``5000.2'' should read 
``5000.2-R''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 66 (Thursday, April 4, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30404]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 175, 179 and 181

46 CFR Parts 2, 159, and 160

[CGD 93-055]

RIN 2115-AE58

Approval of Inflatable Personal Flotation Devices (PFDs) for 
Recreational Boaters

Correction

    In rule document 96-7302 beginning on page 13924 in the issue of 
Thursday, March 28, 1996, make the following correction:

Sec. 160.048-7  [Corrected]

    On page 13930, in the first column, in Sec. 160.048-7, in the 
second line, ``(b)'' should read ``(d)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

In re: 

ALEJANDRA PENA, 

 Debtor. 

________________________________/ 

Case No. 21-11134-BKC-LMI 

Chapter 7 

ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S 

APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF THE CHAPTER 7 FILING FEE 

Upon consideration of the Debtor’s Application for Waiver of the Chapter 7 Filing Fee 

(ECF #6), it is - 

ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Application is granted. 

2. This Order waiving the filing fee shall also be deemed an Order waiving other 

fees scheduled by the Judicial Conference under 28 U.S.C. §1930(b) and (c). 

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 9, 2021.

Case 21-11134-LMI Doc 12 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 2
3. This Order is subject to being vacated at a later time if developments in the 

administration of the bankruptcy case demonstrate that the waiver was unwarranted. 

 ### 

Copies to: 

Hector Gonzalez, Esq. 

Case 21-11134-LMI Doc 12 Filed 02/10/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10516]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------