alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: Chapter 11 Cases 

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-13797-SMG 

LPT, LLC, Case No. 21-15537-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER MARYLAND, LLC, Case No. 21-15539-SMG 

LIBERTY POWER DISTRICT OF 

COLUMBIA, LLC, Case No. 21-15540-SMG 

Debtors. (Jointly administered 21-13797-SMG) 

__________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF OBJECTION TO 

CLAIMS OF FRANCHISE TAX BOARD AND TEXAS COMPTROLLER 

OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS [ECF NO. 935] 

Liberty Power Holdings, LLC (“Holdings”), LPT, LLC (“LPT”), Liberty Power Maryland, 

LLC (“Liberty MD”) and Liberty Power District Of Columbia, LLC (“Liberty DC”) (collectively, 

the “Debtors”), by and through undersigned counsel hereby files this Notice of Withdrawal of 

Notice of Withdrawal of Objection to Claims of Franchise Tax Board and Texas Comptroller of 

Public Accounts [ECF No. 935]. 

Dated: June 20, 2023. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 VENABLE LLP 

 Attorneys for Debtors-in-Possession 

 100 Southeast Second Street, Suite 4400 

 Miami, Florida 33131 

 Telephone: (305) 349-2300 

 Facsimile: (305) 349-2310 

 By: /s/ Heather L. Harmon 

 Paul J. Battista, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 884162 

pjbattista@venable.com 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 937 Filed 06/20/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

Mariaelena Gayo-Guitian, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 813818 

mguitian@venable.com 

Heather L. Harmon 

Florida Bar No. 13192 

hlharmon@venable.com 

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 937 Filed 06/20/23 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 223 (Thursday, November 19, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-21119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-40448; International Series Release No. 1158; File No. 
SR-Amex-98-27]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change and 
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Settlement of the Eurotop 100 
Index

Correction

    In notice document 98-25491 beginning on page 51107, in the issue 
of Thursday, September 24, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 51108, in the second column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as follows:
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: ANA S. COSSIO CASE NUMBER:21-12256-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for June 22, 2021 hearing. All amendments and documents for the June 22, 2021

hearing were due as of June 4, 2021. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

2AP served on 6/1

If counsel for the debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Confirm 2AP

Case 21-12256-AJC Doc 24 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 1
Jose VILLONI, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1629

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Three-dimensional surface deformation derived from airborne interferometric UAVSAR: Application to the Slumgullion Landslide      

      May 12, 2016    

In order to provide surface geodetic measurements with “landslide-wide” spatial coverage, we develop and validate a method for the characterization of 3-D surface deformation using the unique capabilities of the Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) airborne repeat-pass radar interferometry system. We apply our method at the well-studied Slumgullion Landslide, which is 3.9 km long and moves persistently at rates up to ∼2 cm/day. A comparison with concurrent GPS measurements validates this method and shows that it provides reliable and accurate 3-D surface deformation measurements. The UAVSAR-derived vector velocity field measurements accurately capture the sharp boundaries defining previously identified kinematic units and geomorphic domains within the landslide. We acquired data across the landslide during spring and summer and identify that the landslide moves more slowly during summer except at its head, presumably in response to spatiotemporal variations in snowmelt infiltration. In order to constrain the mechanics controlling landslide motion from surface velocity measurements, we present an inversion framework for the extraction of slide thickness and basal geometry from dense 3-D surface velocity fields. We find that the average depth of the Slumgullion Landslide is 7.5 m, several meters less than previous depth estimates. We show that by considering a viscoplastic rheology, we can derive tighter theoretical bounds on the rheological parameter relating mean horizontal flow rate to surface velocity. Using inclinometer data for slow-moving, clay-rich landslides across the globe, we find a consistent value for the rheological parameter of 0.85 ± 0.08.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William Schulz

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

wschulz@usgs.gov

303-273-8404

## Related Content

#### William Schulz

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

wschulz@usgs.gov

303-273-8404

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Slumgullion landslide
                  - Colorado

View All **
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2.9




June 30, 2017


CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3350
Kansas City, Missouri  64106
Re:    Incentive Fee Under Management Agreement for CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to that certain Management Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015 and effective as of May 1, 2015, by and between CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Corridor InfraTrust Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Manager”) (as such agreement has been, and may be further, amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used and not defined herein are used as defined in the Management Agreement.  The Company and the Manager have entered into this Letter Agreement to waive a portion of the Incentive Fee set forth in Section 8(b) of the Management Agreement applicable to the dividend paid during the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2017.  This letter in no way supersedes our May 9, 2016 letter agreement (effective March 31, 2016) concerning the Management Fee calculation.
This letter documents that the Manager has recommended, and the Company has agreed, that the Manager shall only be paid an Incentive Fee of $144,142 as a result of the dividend paid during the Company’s June 30, 2017 calendar quarter.  This agreed upon incentive fee payment constitutes a waiver by the Manager of $4,534 of the Incentive Fee that would otherwise be due to the Manager from the Company.
The foregoing waiver shall not apply to any prior or future periods, although the Manager reserves the right to waive in the future any Incentive Fee payment to which it may be entitled for one or more future fiscal quarters of the Company.
The Company and the Manager mutually acknowledge and agree that this modification to the Incentive Fee payment right represents a discretionary action on the part of the Manager that is not required under the terms of the Management Agreement and that, except as specifically set forth herein, and as modified in our prior May 9, 2016 letter agreement concerning the Management Fee calculation, all provisions of the Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by this letter.






Exhibit 10.2.9



	
				
	 
	 
	Very truly yours,

	 
	 
	CORRIDOR INFRATRUST MANAGEMENT, LLC

	 
	 
	By:  /s/ Richard C. Green, Jr.                                 

	 
	 
	Name:  Richard C. Green, Jr., Managing Director

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Agreed and accepted:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	CORENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE TRUST, INC.
	 

	By:  /s/ David J. Schulte                                          
	 
	 

	Name:  David J. Schulte, President
CGFI2 (11/10/20)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−13960−SMG

Chapter: 7

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Christy M. Roth

6300 NW 28th Ct

Margate, FL 33063

SSN: xxx−xx−9609

NOTICE OF DEADLINE(S) TO CORRECT FILING DEFICIENCY(IES)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE DEBTOR that the above referenced case, which was filed on April 25, 2021, contains

one or more filing deficiency(ies) which must be corrected. Failure to correct a deficiency on or before the deadline posted

below the listed deficiency may result in the document(s) being stricken and/or dismissal of this case without further

notice. Deficiencies in items listed below may include failure to file the document, failure to sign the document, or failure to file

the document using the correct and/or current form that substantially conforms to an Official Bankruptcy Form. Links to all

required Official Bankruptcy Forms and AO Director's national forms and to local rules, forms, instructions and guidelines are on

the court website www.flsb.uscourts.gov.

DEFICIENCY(IES) in your case: You must correct the following deficiency(ies) by the date indicated below each deficiency.

Copies of all payment advices or other evidence of payment received within 60 days

before the filing of the petition as required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1)(B)(iv) for the Debtor.

See Bankruptcy Rule 1007(b) and (c) and Local Rule 1007−1(F). Payment advices are

deficient as indicated: Not filed

Deadline to correct deficiency: 5/10/21

Please also be advised of the following local requirement(s):

Correcting any deficiency related to filing of petitions, schedules, statements or lists. The Local Form "Debtor's Notice of

Compliance with Requirements for Amending Creditor Information" (LF−04) and the Official Bankruptcy Form "Declaration

About an Individual Debtor's Schedules" must accompany the filing of any paper submitted subsequent to the filing of the initial

service matrix. [See Bankruptcy Rules 1007 and 1009, and Local Rules 1007−2(B) and 1009−1(D)]. If the paper you are filing to

correct the deficiency requires you to amend your service matrix, please review the "Clerk's Instructions for Preparing,

Submitting and Obtaining Service Matrices" for additional format, fee and other requirements.

Dated:4/26/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Madeline Ramos−White , Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Debtor

 Attorney for Debtor

Case 21-13960-SMG Doc 6 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 980429110-8110-01; I.D. 042398B]
RIN 0648-AK25


Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; West 
Coast Salmon Fisheries; 1998 Management Measures

Correction

    In rule document 98-11957 beginning on page 24973, in the issue of 
Wednesday, May 6, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 24981, in table 2., the heading ``D. QUOTAS'' should be 
moved and centered above the 10th line from the bottom.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Valeria KRASAVINA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ALEXIS BARBARA, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
gfgi_ex43.htm


Exhibit 4.3


 


FORM OF MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT









THIS MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT ('Agreement') is executed as of the 22nd day of October, 2011, by and among _______ (‘Lender’) and Game Face Gaming, Inc., a Florida Corporation ('Company').







RECITALS







A. Game Face Gaming, Inc as Maker owes the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)pursuant to that certain Promissory  Note dated February 22, 2011, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Note').







B. The parties hereto are desirous of entering into this Extension Agreement.


                                   


AGREEMENT







NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, included but not limited to, the Recitals above, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1. Maturity Date Extension.







a. The Lender and Company agree that the maturity date of the Note ('Maturity' therein), is hereby extended from October 22, 2011 to December 1, 2011.







2. All other provisions of the original Note remain in effect.












Game Face Gaming, Inc.


 


Name_____________________


 


Felix Elinson


 


Title: CEO


 


 


Agreed and Accepted:


 


By:_______________________
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

___________________________ No. 11

- 15214 Non

- Argument Calendar

__________________________ D. C. Docket No. 0:11

- cv - 60488

- WPD EUGE NIA G. HASBUN , Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Defendant

- Appellee

.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________ (February 13, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and FAY , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 11-15214 Date Filed: 02/13/2013 Page: 1 of 32 In May 2007, Eugenia Hasbun executed a promissory note for $52,100 and deed of trust in favor of Bank of America for the purchase of a vacant lot (“property”) in Smithville, Tennessee. She defaulted in her payments, declared bankruptcy, and after receiving a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge in November 2009, Bank of America appointed Recontrust Company (“RC”) as substitute trustee. On March 11, 2010, RC sent Hasbun a foreclosure letter, entitled “Notice of Accelerat ion and Foreclosure,” which notified her that her promissory note was in default, that RC had been asked to institute foreclosure proceedings against the property, and that the notice was not intended as a demand for the balance due on the promissory note when she defaulted payment. Based on her receipt of this letter, Hasbun brought this lawsuit seeking damages against RC for its alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § § 1692(e), 1692(f)(1). RC moved to dismiss Hasbun’s complaint for failure to state a claim.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The court granted its motion. After her first and second amended complaints failed to state a claim, the court dismissed her case with prejudice. Hasbun appeals the dismiss al. We affirm. The FDCPA expressly excludes from the term “debt collector” “any person collecting or attempting to collect any debt owed or due or asserted to be owed or due another to the extent such activity (i) is incidental to a bona fide fiduciar y

Case: 11-15214 Date Filed: 02/13/2013 Page: 2 of 33 obligation or a bona fide escrow arrangement.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692(a)(F). In short, creditors and their fiduciaries are not “debt collectors” subject to the Act. The District Court properly dismissed Hasbun’s second amended complaint for two reasons. Fi rst, RC, as fiduciary of the creditor to whom the debt was owed, was not a debt collector under the Act. And second, the March 11, 2011 letter explicitly informed Hasbun that RC was not demanding payment of a debt; instead, it was notifying her that the p roperty was being foreclosed.
AFFIRMED. 1

1 We stayed brief in this appeal at Hasbun’s request pending the issuance of our mandate in Reese v. Ellis, Painter, Ratterbee & Adams, LLP, 678 F.3d 1211 (11 th Cir. 2012). Reese is, as it turns out, inapposite.

Case: 11-15214 Date Filed: 02/13/2013 Page: 3 of 3
STATE EX REL. Henry Rondell BULLARD v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0535

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, relator fails to show that the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). As to his remaining claim, relator fails to satisfy his burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The District Court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service
[Docket No. 96M-0311]


Draft Public Health Service (PHS) Guideline on Infectious Disease 
Issues in Xenotransplantation (August 1996)

Correction

    In notice document 96-24448 beginning on page 49920 in the issue of 
Monday, September 23, 1996 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 49920, in the second column, under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION in the third line, ``germ'' should read ``term''.
    2. On page 49925, in the second column, in paragraph 3.5. 
Individual Source Animal Screening and Qualification, in the first 
line, ``indivudal'' should read ``individual''.
    3. On page 49931, in the first column, in the first line, 
``Macques'' should read ``Macaques''.
    4. On the same page, in the same column, in reference number 48, in 
the first line, ``Phllips-Conroy'', should read ``Phillips-Conroy''.
    5. On the same page, in the second column, in reference number 56, 
in the fourth line, ``Transplanation'' should read ``Transplantation''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 202 (Tuesday, October 20, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11020]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Postsecondary Education

34 CFR Part 674


Federal Perkins Loan Program

CFR Correction

    In Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 400 to end, 
revised as of July 1, 1998, on page 541, in Sec. 674.19, paragraph 
(b)(5) is removed.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Stratigraphic sections of the Phosphoria formation 1953 and 1954      

      January 1, 1955    

View Document

Since 1947, the U.S. Geological Survey has measured and sampled phosphatic parts of the Permian Phosphoria formation and its partial stratigraphic correlatives at many localities in Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah.  Preliminary data on the thickness of the beds and their composition at localities sampled prior to 1952 have been issued already in TEI-183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 375, 376, 377, and 378. This report presents similar data on the localitites sampled in 1953 and 1954 (figs. 1, 2, and 3).  The field and laboratory procedures adopted in these investigations are described in a previous report (McKelvey and others 1953a).

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 73 Filed 05/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 73 Filed 05/17/20 Page 2 of 2