alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### M A N DATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 49TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ZA PATA COUNTY, GREETIN GS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 31, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Office of the Attorney General, Appellant

V.

Blanca De Leon, Appellee

No. 04

- 13

- 00501

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 8,248

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is REVERSED. We RENDER JUDGMENT that Appellee Blanca De Leon take nothing. Costs of this appeal are taxed against Appellee Blanca De
Leon.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on March 11, 2015

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 13

- 00501

- CV

Office of the Attorney G eneral

v.

Blanca De Leon

(NO. 8,248 IN 49TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT COURT OF ZAPATA COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE
MOTION FEE
MOTION FEE
REPORTER'S RECORD
FILING $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $125.00 $175.00 E

- PAID
E

- PAID
EXEMPT
PAID
EXEMPT ANITA GARZA
ANITA GARZA
DETERREAN GAMBLE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORN EY GENERAL N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE

, CL ERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above nu mbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this March 11, 2015

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge and belief that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated:
August 14, 2003

| |  | BY: | /s/DAVID B. GOULDDavid B. Gould Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

IN RE:

CEMHAN BIRICIK and CASE NO. 20-19507-BKC-MAM

ISABEL BIRICIK, CHAPTER 7

Debtors.

_________________________/

SQUEEZE, LLC and 

ABIDING VENTURES, LLC, 

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 20-01404-MAM

CEMHAN BIRICIK and

ISABEL BIRICIK, 

Defendants.

________________________/

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 24, 2022.

Case 20-01404-MAM Doc 44 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration of the Agreed Motion to Continue 

Hearing [ECF #43]. The parties have agreed to the continuance of the hearing. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The motion to continue is granted. 

2. The Status Conference is reset for December 14, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

3. The hearing will be by Zoom Video Conference only, which permits remote 

participation by video or telephone. To participate through Zoom, participants must 

register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m. one business day before the hearing. To 

register for remote participation, use the following link:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItdumqrzstGdoBW4nz6tq3IJmn8ydPx

j4 

4. If a party is unable to register online, please contact Maria Romaguera, Courtroom 

Deputy at 561-514-4109 or email Maria_Romaguera@flsb.uscourts.gov.

###

Submitted by:

BRIAN K. MCMAHON, P.A.

1401 Forum Way, 6th Floor

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Tel (561)478-2500

Fax (561)478-3111

Briankmcmahon@gmail.com

Attorney McMahon shall provide a copy of this order to all interested parties and file a certificate 

of service.

Case 20-01404-MAM Doc 44 Filed 10/24/22 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 12.01

                   Ratio of earning (loss) to fixed charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Year Ending   Nine Months         Year Ending
                                         December 31,      Ending    ------------------------
                                        --------------  December 31, December 31, December 31,
                                         1997    1998       1999         2000         2001
                                        -------  -----  ------------ ------------ ------------
<S>                                     <C>      <C>    <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings:
   Income (loss) from continuing
     operations before taxes........... $ 7,110  3,055     11,182       (6,801)     (13,402)
   (Income) loss from equity investees.      --     --         --           --           --
   Fixed Charges.......................   5,330  6,509     27,268       43,569       39,543
                                        -------  -----     ------       ------      -------
                                         12,440  9,564     38,450       36,768       26,141
Fixed charges:
   Interest expensed...................   4,672  5,489     23,150       38,001       34,895
   Interest capitalized................      --     --         --           --           --
   Amortized premiums, discounts,
     capital expenses related to
     indebtedness......................      62    226      1,438        1,971        1,781
   Estimated interest within rental
     expense...........................     596    794      2,680        3,597        2,867
                                        -------  -----     ------       ------      -------
       Total fixed charges............. $ 5,330  6,509     27,268       43,569       39,543
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....   2.33 x 1.47 x      1.41x        0.84x       0.66 x
                                        =======  =====     ======       ======      =======
</TABLE>
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

Case Number: 20−17132−LMI Adversary Number: 20−01257−LMI 

In re: 

Name of Debtor(s): Carlos R. Weissenberg 

−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− / 

Denmark Properties Limited 

Plaintiff(s) 

VS 

Carlos R. Weissenberg

Defendant(s) −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT PURSUANT TO F.R.B.P 7055

Defendant, CARLOS R. WEISSENBERG, (“Defendant”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and 

pursuant to F.R.B.P. 7055, hereby files his Motion to Set Aside Default and states the following:

1. Pursuant to F.R.B.P. 7055(C), the Court may set aside an entry of Default for Good Cause. 

2. On September 14, 2020, the Court granted an extension of time for Defendant to file responsive pleadings 

in the instant matter.

3. The request was pursuant to Defendant’s counsel being out for an extended period of time due to 

contracting COVID 19.

4. Defendant’s counsel has been working extensively in order to get his cases caught up and in order. 

5. As a result, his time was stretched thin between matters and was delayed in filing Defendant’s Answer 

and Affirmative Defenses by 34 hours. 

6. This delay was not intentional nor intended to disrupt the progress of this proceeding.

7. Defendant should not be prejudiced by his Counsel’s circumstances.

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court set Aside the Default entered against him, 

and such further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via CM/ECF transmission 

on September 22, 2020 to Eduardo Ayala Maura, Esq. 

/s/ Robert Pereda, Esq. 

Attorney for Defendant/Debtor 

13418 SW 128th Street 

Miami, FL 33186 

Phone: 786-534-4150 

Fax: 866-668-6784 

Robert@roblawmiami.com 

Florida Bar No.: 81985

Case 20-01257-LMI Doc 17 Filed 09/22/20 Page 1 of 1
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

25996

Vol. 62, No. 91

Monday, May 12, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Privacy Act of 1974; System of

Records

Correction

In notice document 97–9736,

beginning on page 18590, in the issue of

Wednesday, April 16, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 18590, in the second

column, under ADDRESSES:, in the

sixth line, ‘‘20350092000’’ should read

‘‘20350–2000’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, under FOR FURTHUR

INFORMATION CONTACT:, in the

second line, ‘‘685096545’’ should read

‘‘685–6545’’.

3. On the same page, in the same

column, under FOR FURTHUR

INFORMATION CONTACT:, in the

third line, ‘‘325096545’’ should read

‘‘325–6545’’.

4. On the same page, in the same

column, in the second paragraph under

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:,

in the tenth line, ‘‘Circular No. A09130’’

should read ‘‘Circular No. A–130’’.

5. On the same page, in the same

column, the heading, ‘‘N05520095’’

should read ‘‘N05520–5’’.

6. On the same page, in the third

column, in the second paragraph under

SYSTEM LOCATION:, in the fifth line,

‘‘21090092902’’ should read ‘‘21090–

2902’’.

7. On the same page, in the same

column, in the fifth paragraph, in the

tenth line, ‘‘20395095720’’ should read

‘‘20395–5720’’.

8. On the same page, in the same

column, in the sixth paragraph, in the

eighth line, ‘‘70149097800’’ should read

‘‘70149–7800’’.

9. On page 18592, in the first column,

in the ninth line ‘‘P0952390926’’ should

read ‘‘P–5239–26’’.

10. On the same page in the same

column, the heading ‘‘N05520095’’

should read ‘‘N05520–5’’.

11. On page 18593, in the second

column, in the first paragraph, in the

second line from the bottom,

‘‘P0952390926’’ should read ‘‘P–5239–

26’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4200-N-59]

Notice of Proposed Information

Collection for Public Comment

Correction

In notice document 97–11533

beginning on page 24499 in the issue of

Monday, May 5, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 24499, in the second column,

in the DATES section, ‘‘June 7, 1997’’

should read ‘‘July 7, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NOTICE OF AGENCY RULE-MAKING PROPOSAL 

AGENCY: Department of Environmental Protection 

RULE TITLE: Graphic Arts - Lithograhy and Letterpress Printing 

PROPOSED RULE NUMBER: Chanter 161 

CONCISE SUMMARY: The Department is proposing a new regulation that restricts volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from offset lithography and letterpress printing operations. Under Section 184 of the 

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the State must submit plans to control VOC emissions from all sources covered 

by a Control Technique Guideline (CTG) issued by US EPA. 

This regulation requires all sources within this category to determine their emission levels and implement reasonable 

options for keeping such emissions at a minimum, in a cost effective way including: control technology approaches, 

VOC and composite vapor pressure limits and standards for work practices . Additional information on this draft rule 

can be found at: http ://www.maine og v/dep/air/regulations/prouosed htm . 

Pursuant to Maine law, interested parties must be publicly notified of the proposed rulemaking, the public hearing 

and be provided an opportunity for comment. Any party interested in providing comment can testify at the public 

hearing or provide written comments before the end of the comment period. All comments should be sent to the 

Agency contact person. 

THIS RULE WILL WILL NOT X HAVE A FISCAL IMPACT ON MUNICIPALITIES 

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: 38 MRSA § 585-A 

PUBLIC HEARING: August 6, 2009 

9:00 AM 

Holiday Inn 

Augusta, Maine ' 

DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS: August 16, 2009 5:00 P.M. 

AGENCY CONTACT PERSON: Deborah Avalone-King 

AGENCY NAME: Bureau of Air Quality Control 

Department of Environmental Protection 

ADDRESS: 17 State House Station 

Augusta, ME 04333 

TELEPHONE: 207-287-7028 FAX:207-287-7641 

FOR PUBLICATION ON July 6, 2009 in KJ MAPA III
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5065 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5065

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2016

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To direct the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration to notify air carriers and security screening personnel 
of the Transportation Security Administration of such Administration's 
  guidelines regarding permitting baby formula, breast milk, purified 
    deionized water, and juice on airplanes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bottles and Breastfeeding Equipment 
Screening Act''.

SEC. 2. TSA SECURITY SCREENING GUIDELINES FOR BABY FORMULA, BREAST 
              MILK, PURIFIED DEIONIZED WATER FOR INFANTS, AND JUICE ON 
              AIRPLANES; TRAINING ON SPECIAL PROCEDURES.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall--
            (1) notify air carriers and security screening personnel of 
        the Transportation Security Administration and personnel of 
        private security companies providing security screening 
        pursuant to section 44920 of title 49, United States Code, of 
        such Administration's guidelines regarding permitting baby 
        formula, breast milk, purified deionized water for infants, and 
        juice on airplanes under the Administration's guidelines known 
        as the 3-1-1 Liquids Rule Exemption; and
            (2) in training procedures for security screening personnel 
        of the Administration and private security companies providing 
        security screening pursuant to section 44920 of title 49, 
        United States Code, include training on special screening 
        procedures.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetic susceptibility of tektites and some other glasses      

      January 1, 1959    

The magnetic susceptibility at several magnetic field strengths of about thirty tektites from various localities have been measured. The susceptibility ranges from 2 × 10−6 to about 7.9 × 10−6 e.m.u./g. Tektites from a given locality have similar susceptibilities. The intensity of magnetization of all the tektites measured is zero or very small.

For comparison, the same measurements have been made on about thirty obsidians. The magnetic susceptibilities cover approximately the same range, but the intensity of magnetization of the impurity was found to be much higher. By heating the obsidians to 1450°C the intensity of magnetization was reduced to zero.

From the above data, it is shown that the tektites must have been heated well above 1400°C, and that essentially all the iron is in solution. On the other hand, the evidence shows that obsidians have not been heated much above this temperature, and that there is a significant amount of undissolved iron in the glass, probably as magnetite. Further, if tektites are extraterrestrial, they probably entered the earth's atmosphere as a glass.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Source parameters and effects of bandwidth and local geology on high- frequency ground motions observed for aftershocks of the northeastern Ohio earthquake of 31 January 1986      

      January 1, 1990    

A 10-station array (GEOS) yielded recordings of exceptional bandwidth (400 sps) and resolution (up to 96 dB) for the aftershocks of the moderate (mb ≈ 4.9) earthquake that occurred on 31 January 1986 near Painesville, Ohio. Nine aftershocks were recorded with seismic moments ranging between 9 × 1016 and 3 × 1019 dyne-cm (Mw: 0.6 to 2.3). The two largest aftershocks (depth 5.3, 5.6 km; oblique right slip, rake ≈30°, strike ≈N25°E) yielded seismic signals above background noise at frequencies as high as 130 Hz at epicentral distances up to 17 km. The aftershock recordings at a site underlain by ≈8 m of lakeshore sediments show significant levels of high-frequency soil amplification of vertical motion at frequencies near 8, 20, and 70 Hz. Viscoelastic models for P and SV waves incident at the base of the sediments yield estimates of vertical P-wave response consistent with the observed high-frequency site resonances, but suggest additional detailed shear-wave logs are needed to account for observed S-wave response. Peak acceleration values obtained from the broadband recordings are about two and four times as large as those that would be recorded on strong-motion recorders or short-period networks with upper bandwidth limits of 30 and 15 Hz, respectively. Attenuation-corrected acceleration spectra are used to reduce the influence of high-frequency (up to 100 Hz) local site effects on corner frequency estimates. The moment versus source radius trend inferred for events with moments as small as 9 × 1016 dyne-cm, based on the Brune source model, extends previous relations inferred for the central United States, shows little evidence for a minimum source radius, and suggests that stress drops for the smaller events (M0 < 1019 dyne-cm) decrease with decreasing moment.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Roger Borcherdt

##### Scientist Emeritus

Earthquake Hazards Program

borcherdt@usgs.gov

650-644-8946

## Related Content

#### Roger Borcherdt

##### Scientist Emeritus

Earthquake Hazards Program

borcherdt@usgs.gov

650-644-8946

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Hazards Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

twoods@usgs.gov

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Ohio

View All **
Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 56 Filed 03/30/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 56 Filed 03/30/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 56 Filed 03/30/21 Page 3 of 3
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

37795

Vol. 61, No. 140

Friday, July 19, 1996

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY

CORPORATION

29 CFR Chapters XXVI and XL

RIN 1212-AA75

Reorganization, Renumbering, and

Reinvention of Regulations; Correction

Correction

In correction rule document 96–17791

beginning on page 37316 in the issue of

Wednesday, July 17, 1996 make the

following correction:

On page 37316, second column,

instruction 2. is corrected to read,

‘‘integer and 0<y≤n

1),’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D