alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-2915

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D. C. Docket No. 94-1548-Civ-T-25B

SAMUEL WEISS, a child, by and 

through his parents and next friends,

Debra S. Weiss and Major M. Benjamin Weiss,

DEBRA S. WEISS,

M. BENJAMIN WEISS, Major,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH

COUNTY, State of Florida,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

 

(May 13, 1998)

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Weiss is an autistic child; he is thirteen years old. In September 1994, his parents

brought this suit for money damages as an appeal of a final order of the State of Florida Division

of Administrative Hearings rendered at the conclusion of an administrative hearing conducted

pursuant to Section 1415 (c) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§

1400-1415. In their amended complaint, Samuel’s parents contend that the School Board of

Hillsborough County, Florida, failed to provide Samuel with a “free appropriate public

education,” as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and, in failing to

provide such education, denied him rights established by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29

U.S.C. § 794. Samuel’s parents also contend that the School Board infringed two rights

guaranteed Samuel by the Fourteenth Amendment: the right to the equal protection of the laws

and the right of travel.

On cross motions for summary judgement, the district court, in the order appearing in the

Appendix, entered summary judgment for the School Board. Samuel’s parents appeal,

contending the district court should have granted their motion for summary judgment and denied

the Board’s motion. After considering their arguments for reversal, we conclude that, in all

respects, the district court properly applied the law to the material facts (which the parties agree

are not in dispute). 

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Teton Dam flood of June 1976, Pingree quadrangle, Idaho      

      January 1, 1976    

View Plate

The failure of the Teton Dam caused extreme flooding along the Teton River, Henrys Fork, and Snake River in southeastern Idaho on June 5-8, 1976. No flooding occurred downstream from American Falls Reservoir. The inundated areas and maximum water-surface elevations are shown in a series of 17 hydrologic atlases. The area covered by the atlases extends from Teton Dam downstream to American Falls Reservoir, a distance of 100 miles. The extent of flooding shown on the maps was obtained by field inspections and aerial photographs made during and immediately after the flood. There may be small isolated areas within the boundaries shown that were not flooded, but the identification of these sites was beyond the scope of the study. The elevation data shown are mean-sea-level elevations of high-water marks identified in the field. This particular map (in the 17-map series) shows conditions in the Pingree quadrangle. (Woodard-USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Idaho Water Science Center

230 Collins Rd.Boise, ID83702-4520United States

Phone: (208) 387-1300

(208) 387-1372

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pingree Quadrangle
                  - Idaho

View All **
James Raymond SISSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Freddie Lee RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2971

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80314]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eran
Broshy, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of inVentiv, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of inVentiv.








By:
              /s/ DAVID
      S. BASSINDavid
      S. BassinChief
      Financial Officer






DATE:
February 29, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Debtor name ELtr":.sf,yf. Qt+iftllq &Sl

united states Bankruptcy court rortn"' 3c){ihER}'l District ol

case number (rknown): rJL\ 

- t-'363 -P6 A

Official Form 204

Ghapter 11 or Chapter 9 Cases:

Unsecured Glaims and Are Not

E Check il this is an

amended tiling

List of Greditors Who Have the 2O Largest

lnsiders lp;ls

A list of creditors holding the 20 largest unsecured claims must be filed in a Chapter 11 or Chapter I case. lnolude claims which the debtor

dispuies. Do not include claims by any person or entity who is an insider, as defined in 11 U.S.C. S 101(31). Also, do not include claims by

secured creditors, unless the unsecured claim resulting from inadequate collateral value places the creditor among the holders of the 20

largest unsecured claims.

Name of creditor and complele Name, telephone number, and

mailing address, including zip code email address ol creditor

contact

Nature of the claim lndicate il Amount of unsecured claim

(for example, trade claim is l{ the claim is fully unsecured, fill in only unsecured

debls. bank loans, contingent, 

- claim amount. lt claim is partially secured, fill in professional unliquidated, total claim amount and deduction for value of

services, and or disputed collateral or setolf to calculate unsecured claim.

government

contracls)

Total claim, il Deduction ,or

pariially value ot

secured collaleral or

selofl

Unsecured

claim

J..Ni C IJ I C Bfu.. LSTE,'JA TR

9o5c,hr'O. DAP\B[^Q

tlae Bq rxLll A\]t "#l'FC

Ir\ rNlirrrL33l3l

|E*c RE6r1; ritcsnr9 1Erl

fturPAnlc 6ct\,fe3fr1

tr0'i6nngr"-*tT

IR\oE

C€ST

t3.f,?,$-

6,ece -

Ofticial Form 204 Chapter 11 or Chapter 9 Cases: List ol Creditors Who Have the 20 Largest Unsecured Claims page 1

Case 20-13363-PGH Doc 2 Filed 03/12/20 Page 1 of 2

Exhibit "B"

Case 20-13438-SMG Doc 9-2 Filed 03/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Name ot creditor and complete

mailing address, including zip code

Name, telephone number, and

email address ot creditor

contact

Nature ol the claim

(for example. trade

debts. bank loans,

professional

services, and

government

contracts)

lndicate il

claim is

contingent!

unliquidated,

or disputed

Amount of unsecured claim

lf the claim is lully unsecured, fill in only unsecured

claim amounl. l{ claim is parlially secured, fill in

total claim amount and deduction for value of

collateral or setof, to calculate unsecured claim.

10

Total claim, if

parlially

secured

Deduclion ror

value ol

collateral cr

seloft

Unsecured

claim

17

18

Official Form 204 Chapter 1 1 or Chapter g Cases: List of Creditors Who Have the 20 Largest Unsecured Claims page 2

case number 1,rm,,", &Q - l,37(3* kil

o

10

13

14

15

16

io

Case 20-13438-SMG Doc 9-2 Filed 03/19/20 Page 2 of 2 Case 20-13363-PGH Doc 2 Filed 03/12/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4902 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4902

    To amend title 5, United States Code, to expand law enforcement 
 availability pay to employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection's 
                       Air and Marine Operations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2016

Mr. Hurd of Texas (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Mr. McCaul, Ms. Michelle 
     Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. Farenthold, and Ms. McSally) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to expand law enforcement 
 availability pay to employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection's 
                       Air and Marine Operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AVAILABILITY PAY FOR EMPLOYEES OF CUSTOMS 
              AND BORDER PROTECTION'S AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5545a(i) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``apply to a pilot employed by the United 
        States Customs Service'' and inserting ``apply to any employee 
        of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Air and Marine 
        Operations, or any successor organization,''; and
            (2) by striking ``such pilot'' and inserting ``such 
        employee''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first applicable pay period 
beginning on or after the date that is 14 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
49306 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Corrections

insert ‘‘and inserting in its place the

phrase ‘‘Mandatory Procedures for

Major Defense Acquisition Programs

(MDAPs) and Major Automated

Information System.’’

252.246-7002 [Corrected]

4. On page 34135, in the second

column, under the section heading

252.246-7002, in paragraph (c), in the

sixth line, ‘‘read’’ should read ‘‘real’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 252

[DFARS Case 97-D302]

Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement; Certification

of Requests for Equitable Adjustment

Correction

In rule document 97–18218,

beginning on page 37146, in the issue of

Friday, July 11, 1997, make the

following correction:

252.243-702 [Corrected]

On page 37147, in the third column,

in the first paragraph, the third line,

‘‘may’’ should read ‘‘my’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Lazaro ALVAREZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. EL FARO LATIN CAFE, INC., etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2288

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T K EI TH E. W I G G I N S, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. J . F. SA LA ZA R, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 16091 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 1 7 5 - O WW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O l i ve rW . W a nge r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erK eith E . W ig g in s ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. W i ggi ns c ont e nds tha tthe 2006 de c i s i on of the B oa r d of

P a r ol e H e a r i ngs 

# FI LED JU N 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16091 2 ( “ B oa r d” ) de ny i ng hi s pa r ol e w a s nots upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e ” of c urr e nt dang er ou snes s and , there fore , vi ol at ed hi s due proces s r i gh t s. T he on l y f eder al r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p a r o le c o n te x t is p r o c e du r a l, a n dth e o n lyp r o p e rin q u iryis w h atp ro cess th e i n m at e received , n o tw h eth er th e st at e co u rtd eci d edth e case c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S .C t. 8 5 9 , 8 6 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . B e c au s e W ig g in s r a is e s n o p r o c e du r a l c h a lle n g e s , w e a f f irm . W i ggi ns ’ s m ot i ons f

orj udi c i a l not i c e , r e c e i ve d on N ove m be r23, 2009, a nd F e b ru a ry2 2 , 2 0 1 0 , r e s p e c tiv e ly , a r e d e e m e df ile da n da r e d e n ie da s m o o t. H is sugg es t i on for s up pl em ent al bri ef i ng on the i m pactof C oo ke is a ls o d e n ie d . See P e a rs o n v . Mu n tz , N o. 08- 55728, 2011 W L 1238007, a t*5 ( 9th C i r . A pr i l 5, 20 11 ). AF F I RME D.
Case 20-21682-LMI Doc 24 Filed 12/28/20 Page 1 of 2
12/28/2020

Case 20-21682-LMI Doc 24 Filed 12/28/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 89 (Thursday, May 8, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 25224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10508]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 89 / Thursday, May 8, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 25224]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. HB52-92-3-005]


York Haven Power Company, Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation, 
Pennsylvania Power & Light Company, Susquehanna Power Company, and PECO 
Energy Power Company; Notice of Information Settlement Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 97-11541, appearing on page 24442, in the issue 
of Monday, May 5, 1997, the docket line should appear as set forth 
above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Shedrick LURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0957

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R . 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

2 See 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40152 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

RUBEN LEONIDES-JAIMES; JOSE MATILDE NAJERA AGUIRRE; ANDRES SANTANA-HERRERA; PEDRO BERRUETE-MALDONADO,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(B-96-CR-212-2)

December 22, 1997

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

A jury convicted the defendants/appellants of conspiracy to

transport and the transportation of undocumented aliens within the

United States. 2 In this consolidated appeal, the defendants argue

that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support

their respective convictions. We find that the evidence is3 Guzman v. Lensing , 934 F.2d 80, 82 (5th Cir. 1991)

4 The defendants appear to have used one of the trucks for the purpose of conducting counter-surveillance.

2 sufficient to support the convictions. We affirm.

We will not disturb a conviction attacked on the basis of

evidence suffi ciency if, viewing the evidence in the light most

favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have

found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reason able

doubt. 3 Among the prosecution’s evidence in this case was the

testimony of Senior Border Patrol Agent Gilberto Perez. Perez

testified that on July 26, 1997, acting on an anonymous tip, he

encountered the defendants in an area notorious for the smuggling

of aliens. The defend ants’ appearances matched the descriptions

given to Perez by the anonymous caller. Agents took finger prints

and photographs of the defendant s, but released them later that

morning. The following night, electronic sensors alerted the

Border Patrol to possible smuggling of aliens in the area

identified by the an onymous caller the previous night. Perez

proceeded to that location and observed the defendants in two

separate vehicles, at least one of which was also occupied by

illegal aliens. 4 Agents found plastic bags containing women’s and

c hildren’s clothing in the bed of one of the trucks. A rational

trier of fact could reasonably have concluded that these items

belonged to illegal aliens being transported by the defendants. As

such, the jury could reasonably have found the essential elements

of the two crimes beyond a reasonable doubt.3

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
annual report of UPM-Kymmene Oyj (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 26, 2005



/s/    JUSSI
PESONENName:

Jussi PesonenTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




/s/    KARI TOIKKAName:

Kari ToikkaTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                       2,570,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  600,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,132,963
<PP&E>                                       1,631,453
<DEPRECIATION>                               (134,290)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,336,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,037,849
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (715,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,336,981
<SALES>                                      6,534,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,534,992
<CGS>                                        5,527,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,527,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,311,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (281,090)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (281,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (281,090)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
Maria MEDERO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2983

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

Arminda Cespedes Case No. 20-20169-RAM 

 Debtor(s). Chapter 13

_________________________/

SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Motion to Compel 

Release of Lien or Determine Fully Unsecured Status of Lien and Notice of Hearing was 

sent to all parties on the attached service list on January 19, 2021.

Electronically: Nancy K. Neidich, Trustee

First Class Mail, unless otherwise noted: 

Debtor(s), Arminda Cespedes 

41 E 7 Street #1C

Hialeah, FL 33010-4435

Capital One Bank

c/o Richard Fairbank, CEO

1680 Capital One Drive 

McLean, VA 22102-3491

Capital One Bank, N.A. CERTIFIED MAIL

c/o Richard Fairbank, CEO

4851 Cox Road

Glen Allen, VA 23060

Capital One Bank

c/o CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

1201 HAYS STREET

TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-2525

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, 

LLC CERTIFIED MAIL

c/o Graves, Christopher Barclay, President

120 CORPORATE BLVD., Suite 100

NORFOLK, VA 23502

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, 

LLC

c/o Graves, Christopher Barclay, President

130 CORPORATE BLVD.

NORFOLK, VA 23502

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, 

LLC

c/o CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

1201 HAYS STREET

TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-2525

Respectfully Submitted: 

ROBERT SANCHEZ, P.A. 

Attorney for Debtor

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Tel. 305-687-8008

By:/s/ Robert Sanchez_____________

Case 20-20169-RAM Doc 40 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 1
Crystal FIGUEROA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.