alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           National-scale assessment of total gaseous mercury isotopes across the United States      

      April 12, 2023    

With the 2011 promulgation of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the successful negotiation by the United Nations Environment Program of the Minamata Convention, emissions of mercury (Hg) have declined in the United States. While the declines in atmospheric Hg concentrations in North America are encouraging, linking the declines to changing domestic and global source portfolios remains challenging. To address these research gaps, the U.S. Geological Survey initiated the first national-scale effort to establish a baseline of total gaseous mercury stable isotope values at 31 sites distributed across the United States. Results indicated that unique Hg sources, such as Hg evasion from an elemental Hg contaminated site or free tropospheric intrusions in high altitude sites, were distinguishable from background atmospheric values. Minor gradients were observed across the nation, with regions of heavy industrial activity demonstrating lower δ202Hg, but no consistent changes in other isotopes such as Δ199Hg and Δ200Hg were observed. Furthermore, δ202Hg was impacted by foliar uptake and senescence but trends varied between forested regions in the northeastern and midwestern United States. These data demonstrate regional emission sources and other environmental variables can impact total gaseous Hg (TGM) isotope values, highlighting the need to characterize atmospheric Hg isotopes over larger geographical areas to evaluate changes related to national and international Hg regulations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Sarah E Janssen

##### Research Chemist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

##### Mercury Research Laboratory Team Lead

Mercury Research Laboratory

sjanssen@usgs.gov

608-663-5162

#### David P Krabbenhoft

##### Scientist Emeritus

Mercury Research Laboratory

Mercury Research Laboratory

dpkrabbe@usgs.gov

608-335-4234

## Related Content

#### Sarah E Janssen

##### Research Chemist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

##### Mercury Research Laboratory Team Lead

Mercury Research Laboratory

sjanssen@usgs.gov

608-663-5162

#### David P Krabbenhoft

##### Scientist Emeritus

Mercury Research Laboratory

Mercury Research Laboratory

dpkrabbe@usgs.gov

608-335-4234

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

####               Upper Midwest Water Science Center - Madison, WI, Office          

1 Gifford Pinchot DriveMadison, WI53726United States

608-828-9901

608-821-3817

### Explore Search

                  - United States

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 132 (Thursday, July 10, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 37124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. 28930; Notice No. 97-9]
RIN 2120-AF82


Revision of Gate Requirements for High-Lift Device Controls

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-14886, beginning on page 31482, in the 
issue of Monday, June 9, 1997, make the following corrections:
    On page 31482, in the first column, under ADDRESSES, in the 14th 
line, ``<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5868891968584a3a4a4eba1aab1eba2aab3">[email protected]</a>.'' should read ``<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cb88869f988badaaaae5afa4bfe5aca4bd">[email protected]</a>.''


Sec. 25.145  [Corrected]

    On page 31485, in the first column, in Sec. 25.145(c), in the fifth 
line, ``positive'' should read ``position''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4887 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4887

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, as the ``Richard Allen Cable 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD ALLEN CABLE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Richard Allen Cable Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard 
Allen Cable Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4887

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, as the ``Richard Allen Cable 
                             Post Office''.
```
Exhibit 10.44





SOUTHERN COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST





Amendment # 2 to the


Amended & Restated Salary Continuation Agreement of


F. Scott Bauer





This Amendment #2 (herein referred to as the “Amendment”) to the Amended & Restated Salary Continuation Agreement(herein referred to as the “Original Agreement”) that was entered into on 16th day of March, 2007, by and between Southern Community Bank andTrust, a North Carolina-chartered bank (herein referred to as the “Bank”), and F. Scott Bauer, its Chief Executive
Officer(herein referred to as the “Executive”).





WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Original Agreement provides that the Original Agreement may be modified by the mutual written contest of both the Bank and the Executive;





WHEREAS,the Bank and the Executive believe it to be in the best interest of each party to modify the benefit amount payable under the Original Agreement, and therefore do hereby mutually agree to “freeze” the Executive’s “Accrual Account” as of December 31, 2010 as defined in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement. The Amount of such frozen Accrual Account as of December 31, 2010 is $774,405;





WHEREAS,the amount of the Executive’s frozen “Accrued Account” as of December 31, 2010 shall be converted to a monthly Life Annuity in accordance with the Actuarial(Actuarially) Equivalentfactors as provided in Section 1.2(a) of the Original Agreement and such new amount shall be payable as of his Normal Retirement Date in accordance with Section 2.1(a).





WHEREAS,the Executive understands and agrees that no additional benefits shall accrue under the Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment #2 after December 31, 2010, until such time that the Executive and the Bank mutually agree in writing to a change in future benefit accruals.  The Executive understands that the Bank will review the Original Agreement and this Amendment #2 for reinstatement in 2012.





WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive intend that this Amendment # 2 shall supersede the amount of monthly (and annual) benefits previously provided in Section 2.1(a) of the Original Agreement.





NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Bank hereby agree as follows:





Section 2.1
Normal Retirement Benefit is amended by deleting the current subsection (a) and replacing it in its entirety with the following new subsection (a):





(a)           Amount of Normal Form of benefit. The annual Normal Retirement benefit under this Section 2.1 is $75,344, which shall be paid in monthly installments in the monthly amount of $6,279 for the Life of the Executive (Normal Form is a Life Annuity).




Page 1





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Bank have executed this Amendment # 2 to the Amended & Restated Salary Continuation Agreement as of this 16th day of December, 2010.





Executive:

Southern Community Bank and Trust:/s/ F. Scott Bauer

By:
/s/ James HastingsF. Scott Bauer


Title:
Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





Page 2
From: Kent.Martens@ct.spx.com Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:22 PM To: Sunda, John B. John, During our phone conversation, you asked about the cost impact of sound attenuation on cooling towers. As you suggested, I ran a selection to cool 150,000 gpm, with a 15 deg Range, 10 deg Approach to a 78 wet-bulb temperature. The baseline tower is 10 cells, about 48' x 486' in plan area with one 200 horsepower fan motor per cell. The overall tower SPL (considering sound from both the mechanical equipment/fan exit, and the air inlet is 60 dBA at 500'. You mentioned a target of 50 dBA at 500'. There are many ways to reduce sound, which include reducing fan speed, low noise fans, barrier walls, inlet and outlet attenuation and water splash attenuation. For this example, in order to meet the target, I reduced the fan speed (which requires a physically larger tower), added fan deck and perimeter barrier walls, and splash attenuation. The resulting selection is a 10 cell tower, 54' x 546' in plan area, with 125 horsepower fan motors. The total estimated cost of the larger tower, along with the additional sound features is about 60% higher than the baseline tower. For lower sound levels, inlet and possibly outlet attenuation packages would be involved, probably driving the cost to more than 2x a standard tower. Please let me know if you have any further questions on this topic. I am doing a global search to determine if we have any plume-abated towers on seawater, or brackish water, and will let you know when I get some responses.

Kent A. Martens, P. E. Chief Technical Advisor - Evaporative Cooling SPX Cooling Technologies 7401 W 129 Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA Tel: 913/664-7501 Fax: 913/693-9522Cell: 913/302-7234 kent.martens@spx.com

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by SPX Corporation for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be corrected.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4957 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 111
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4957

                          [Report No. 114-534]

To designate the Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., 
  in the District of Columbia as the ``Ariel Rios Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2016

Mr. Carson of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Carter of Texas, 
 Mrs. Comstock, Mr. Curbelo of Florida, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Ms. Edwards, 
Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Norton, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, 
and Mr. Visclosky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                              May 3, 2016

                Additional sponsor: Ms. Brown of Florida

                              May 3, 2016

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., 
  in the District of Columbia as the ``Ariel Rios Federal Building''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., in the 
District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``Ariel Rios 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ariel Rios Federal 
Building''.
                                                 House Calendar No. 111

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4957

                          [Report No. 114-534]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., 
  in the District of Columbia as the ``Ariel Rios Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 3, 2016

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES, Appellee

v. Michael IGNACIO, Cryptologic Technician (Interpretive) First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy, Appellant

No. 12-0202 Crim. App. No. 201100062 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued April 23, 2012 Decided May 10, 2012

PER CURIAM Counsel

For Appellant: Captain Michael D. Berry , USMC (argued). For Appellee: Lieutenant Benjamin J. Voce-Gardner , USN (argued); Colonel Kurt J. Brubaker , USMC, and Brian K. Keller , Esq. (on brief). Military Judge: Donald C. King

**This opinion is subject to revision before final publication .** United States v. Ignacio , No. 12-0202/NA

2 PER CURIAM: Court members sitting as a general court-martial convicted Cryptologic Technician First Class Michael Ignacio of abusive sexual contact in violation of Article 120(h), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920(h). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, three years of confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-1. The United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence. United States v. Ignacio , No. NMCCA 20110062, slip op. at 2 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. Nov. 8, 2011). When discussing the proposed instructions on evidence of consent, the military judge explained on the record why he would instruct the panel pursuant to the Military Judges’ Benchbook 1 rather than the statutory language. See United States v.

Prather , 69 M.J. 338 (C.A.A.F. 2011); United States v. Medina , 69 M.J. 462, 465 (C.A.A.F. 2011). The military judge’s instructions included the statement that “[e]vidence of consent is relevant to whether the prosecution has proven the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt” and that “[t]he prosecution has the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that consent did not exist.” We granted review of this case to

1 Dep’t of the Army, Pam. 27-9, Legal Services, Military Judges’ Benchbook (2010).United States v. Ignacio , No. 12-0202/NA

3 determine if the military judge erred in so instructing the panel. “Whether a panel was properly instructed is a question of law reviewed de novo.” United States v. Ober , 66 M.J. 393, 405 (C.A.A.F. 2008). “If [evidence of consent] is presented, the judge must ensure that the factfinder is instructed to consider all of the evidence, including the evidence raised by the defendant that is pertinent to the affirmative defense, when determining whether the prosecution established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Neal , 68 M.J. 289, 304 (C.A.A.F. 2010). Here the instructions correctly conveyed the Government’s burden to the members. The decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is therefore affirmed.
Eugene REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3093

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 20-17394-AJC Doc 2 Filed 07/06/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-17394-AJC Doc 2 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 24.1



                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints John Hugo and Alexandre Westphalen, and
each of them, his attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him
in any and all capacities, to sign on behalf of CompleTel Europe N.V., a
public limited liability company organized under the laws of The Netherlands,
an annual report on Form 10-K, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") in
compliance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact full power and authority to perform any
other act on behalf of the undersigned required to be done in the premises,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Signature                                      Title                                 Date

<S>                                         <C>                                           <C>
By:  Jerome de Vitry                       Chief Executive Officer,
--------------------------------             President and Managing Director               September    , 2002
Name:  Jerome de Vitry                       (Principal Executive Officer)


By:  John M. Hugo                          Corporate Controller (Principal                 September    , 2002
--------------------------------           Accounting Officer)
Name: John M. Hugo


By:  Alexandre Westphalen                  Vice President, Finance                         September    , 2002
--------------------------------
Name:  Alexandre Westphalen


By:  James E. Dovey                        Supervisory Director                            September    , 2002
--------------------------------
Name:  James E. Dovey


By:  James C. Allen                        Supervisory Director                            September    , 2002
--------------------------------
Name:  James C. Allen


By:  Lawrence F. DeGeorge                  Supervisory Director                            September    , 2002
Name:  Lawrence F. DeGeorge

By:  Paul J. Finnegan                      Supervisory Director                            September    , 2002
--------------------------------
Name:  Paul J. Finnegan


By:  James H. Kirby                        Supervisory Director                            September    , 2002
--------------------------------
Name:  James H. Kirby


By:  James N. Perry, Jr.                   Supervisory Director                            September    , 2002
--------------------------------
Name:  James N. Perry, Jr.
</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Signatures of high-latitude waves in observations of geomagnetic acceleration      

      January 1, 2023    

Models for the second time-derivative of the geomagnetic field reveal prominent activity at high latitudes. Alternating patches of positive and negative geomagnetic acceleration propagate to the west at speeds that exceed nominal fluid velocities in the core. We show that waves are a viable interpretation of these observations. Magnetic Rossby waves produce a high-latitude response with suitable phase velocities. However, the spatial complexity of the prediction is not compatible with the observations. Our preferred interpretation involves zonal MAC waves. These waves can account for the observed geomagnetic field when a stratified layer exists at the top of the core. The required layer has a thickness in excess of 100 km and a buoyancy frequency comparable to the rotation frequency. We anticipate a gradual reduction in the phase velocity over time, leading to a future change in the propagation direction.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Margaret Avery, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

mavery@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Margaret Avery, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

mavery@usgs.gov

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Geology
                  - Geomagnetism

View All **
NO. 07-08-0232-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JUNE 30, 2008

	In re: JOHANSON LEE WATSON, 

									Relator

	______________________________________	 

	Original Proceeding

		_____________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Pending before this court is the petition of Johanson Lee Watson for a writ of mandamus.  He requests that we “direct the trial court to comply with its own order.”  The order in question was entered in March of 2007 and required DNA testing on evidence involved in his criminal trial.  We deny the petition.

	According to relator's petition, he moved for DNA testing and appointed counsel.  The trial court subsequently granted both requests.  However, relator, acting pro se despite having legal counsel, maintains that the trial court failed to comply with its directive and seeks a writ telling the “trial court to comply with its own order” and apparently cause the DNA testing to occur.

	In civil cases, a party is entitled to represent himself or to be represented by an attorney, but he is not entitled to representation partly by counsel and partly pro se.   Tex. R. Civ. P. 7; In re Sondley, 990 S.W.2d 361, 362 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1999, orig. proceeding).  Moreover, we have no obligation to accept or consider pleadings filed pro se by a party who is represented by counsel.  In re Sondley, 990 S.W.2d at 362.  So, because Watson has appointed counsel but no right to hybrid representation, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus per our holding in Sondley. 	

							Brian Quinn

						         Chief Justice