17392 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(344) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) * * * 

(2) Previously approved on May 30, 

2007 in paragraph (c)(344)(i)(C)(1) of 

this section and now deleted with 

replacement in paragraph 

(c)(461)(i)(D)(1), Rule 4905, ‘‘NaturalGas-Fired Fan-Type Central Furnaces,’’ 

adopted on October 20, 2005. 

* * * * * 

(379) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(A) * * * 

(6) Previously approved on August 4, 

2010 in paragraph (c)(379)(i)(A)(3) of 

this section and now deleted with 

replacement in paragraph 

(c)(461)(i)(C)(2), Rule 1111, ‘‘Reduction 

of NOX Emissions from Natural-GasFired Fan-Type Central Furnaces,’’ 

amended on November 6, 2009. 

* * * * * 

(461) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) * * * 

(2) Rule 1111, ‘‘Reduction of NOX

Emissions From Natural-Gas-Fired, FanType Central Furnaces,’’ amended 

September 5, 2014. 

(D) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air 

Pollution Control District. 

(1) Rule 4905, ‘‘Natural-Gas-Fired, 

Fan-Type Central Furnaces,’’ amended 

January 22, 2015. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–06962 Filed 3–28–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 711 

[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–0809; FRL–9941–19] 

Partial Exemption of Certain Chemical 

Substances From Reporting Additional 

Chemical Data 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is amending the list of 

chemical substances that are partially 

exempt from reporting additional 

information under the Chemical Data 

Reporting (CDR) rule. EPA has 

determined that, based on the totality of 

information available on the chemical 

substances listed in this final rule, there 

is a low current interest in their CDR 

processing and use information. EPA 

reached this conclusion after 

considering a number of factors, 

including the risk of adverse human 

health or environmental effects, 

information needs for CDR processing 

and use information, and the 

availability of other sources of 

comparable processing and use 

information. 

DATES: This final rule is effective March 

29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–0809, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pollution Prevention 

and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPPT 

Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical information contact: Christina 

Thompson, Chemical Control Division 

(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention 

and Toxics, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (202) 564–0983; email address: 

thompson.christina@epa.gov. 

For general information contact: The 

TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 

South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 

14620; telephone number: (202) 554– 

1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you manufacture (defined 

by statute at 15 U.S.C. 2602(7) to 

include import) the chemical substances 

contained in this rule. The North 

American Industrial Classification 

System (NAICS) codes provided here 

are not intended to be exhaustive, but 

rather provide a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include chemical 

manufacturers subject to CDR reporting 

of one or more subject chemical 

substances (NAICS codes 325 and 

324110), e.g., chemical manufacturing 

and petroleum refineries. 

II. Background 

A. What action is the agency taking? 

This partial exemption eliminates an 

existing reporting requirement under 40 

CFR 711.6(b)(2). EPA is adding the 

following chemical substances to the list 

of chemical substances that are exempt 

from reporting the information 

described in 40 CFR 711.15(b)(4): Fatty 

acids, C14–18 and C16–18 unsaturated, 

methyl esters (Chemical Abstract 

Services Registry Number (CASRN) 

67762–26–9); fatty acids, C16–18 and C– 

18 unsaturated, methyl esters (CASRN 

67762–38–3); fatty acids, canola oil, 

methyl esters (CASRN 129828–16–6); 

fatty acids, corn oil, methyl esters 

(CASRN 515152–40–6); fatty acids, 

tallow, methyl esters (CASRN 61788– 

61–2); and soybean oil, methyl esters 

(CASRN 67784–80–9). However, by 

existing terms at 40 CFR 711.6, this 

partial exemption will become 

inapplicable to a subject chemical 

substance in the event that the chemical 

substance later becomes the subject of a 

rule proposed or promulgated under 

section 4, 5(a)(2), 5(b)(4), or 6 of the 

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); 

an enforceable consent agreement (ECA) 

developed under the procedures of 40 

CFR part 790; an order issued under 

TSCA section 5(e) or 5(f); or relief that 

has been granted under a civil action 

under TSCA section 5 or 7. 

In the January 27, 2015 Federal 

Register (80 FR 4482)(FRL–9921–56), 

EPA published a direct final rule to add 

these six chemical substances to the list 

of chemical substances that are partially 

exempt from reporting additional 

information under the CDR rule. EPA 

received one adverse comment that was 

pertinent to all six of the chemical 

substances that were the subject of that 

direct final rule. In accordance with the 

procedures described in the January 27, 

2015 Federal Register document, EPA 

withdrew the direct final rule, and 

subsequently proposed to add the six 

chemical substances to the list of 

chemical substances that are partially 

exempt from reporting additional 

information under the CDR rule in the 

July 22, 2015 Federal Register (80 FR 

43383) (FRL–9928–99). EPA received 

one comment on the proposed rule. 

Before taking final action, EPA 

considered both the comment it 

received in response to the direct final 

rule and the comment it received in 

response to the proposed rule. A full 

discussion of EPA’s responses to these 

comments is included in Unit V. of this 

document. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 17393 

B. What is the agency’s authority for 

taking this action? 

This action is finalized under the 

authority of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2600 et 

seq., to carry out the provisions of 

section 8(a), 15 U.S.C. 2607(a). TSCA 

section 8(a) authorizes EPA to 

promulgate rules under which 

manufacturers of chemical substances 

and mixtures must submit such 

information as the Agency may 

reasonably require. The partial 

exemption list was established in 2003 

(Ref. 1) and can be found in 40 CFR 

711.6. 

Consistent with section 553 of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 

U.S.C. 553, EPA is finalizing this action 

based on public notice and opportunity 

to comment afforded by the July 22, 

2015 proposed rule. Under section 

553(d)(1) of the APA, the Agency may 

make a rule immediately effective 

‘‘which grants or recognizes an 

exemption or relieves a restriction.’’ 

EPA has determined that this action 

‘‘relieves a restriction’’ by creating a 

partial exemption from CDR reporting, 

without creating any new reporting or 

recordkeeping requirements, and that 

this action will be effective immediately 

upon publication in the Federal 

Register. 

C. Why is the agency taking this action? 

This rule is in response to a petition 

EPA received for these chemical 

substances (Refs. 2 and 3) submitted 

under 40 CFR 711.6(b)(2)(iii)(A). EPA 

reviewed the information put forward in 

the petition and additional information 

against the considerations listed at 40 

CFR 711.6(b)(2)(ii). EPA’s chemical 

substance-specific analysis is detailed in 

supplementary documents available in 

the docket under docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–0809 (Refs. 4, 5, 

6, 7, 8, and 9). The Agency is adding 

these chemical substances to the 

partially exempt chemical substances 

list because it has concluded that, based 

on the totality of information available, 

the CDR processing and use information 

for these chemical substances is of low 

current interest. 

D. What are the impacts of this action? 

There are no costs associated with 

this action and the benefits provided 

would be related to avoiding potential 

costs. This partial exemption eliminates 

an existing reporting requirement 

without imposing any new 

requirements. See also the discussion in 

Unit VI. 

III. Petition Process and ‘‘Low Current 

Interest’’ Partial Exemption 

In 2003 (Ref. 1), EPA established a 

partial exemption for certain chemical 

substances for which EPA determined 

the processing and use information 

required in 40 CFR part 711 to be of 

‘‘low current interest.’’ That provision 

establishes a particular procedure 

whereby the public may petition EPA to 

add or remove a chemical substance to 

or from the list of partially exempt 

chemical substances. In determining 

whether the partial exemption should 

apply to a particular chemical 

substance, EPA considers the totality of 

information available for the chemical 

substance in question, including but not 

limited to information associated with 

one or more of the considerations listed 

at 40 CFR 711.6(b)(2)(ii). 

The addition of a chemical substance 

under this partial exemption will not 

necessarily be based on its potential 

risks. The addition is based on the 

Agency’s current assessment of the need 

for collecting CDR processing and use 

information for that chemical substance, 

based upon the totality of information 

available during the petition review 

process. Additionally, interest in a 

chemical substance or a chemical 

substance’s processing and use 

information may increase in the future, 

at which time EPA will reconsider the 

applicability of a partial exemption for 

a chemical substance. 

IV. Rationale for These Partial 

Exemptions 

EPA is granting a partial exemption 

for: Fatty acids, C14–18 and C16–18 

unsaturated, methyl esters (CASRN 

67762–26–9); fatty acids, C16–18 and C– 

18 unsaturated, methyl esters (CASRN 

67762–38–3); fatty acids, canola oil, 

methyl esters (CASRN 129828–16–6); 

fatty acids, corn oil, methyl esters 

(CASRN 515152–40–6); fatty acids, 

tallow, methyl esters (CASRN 61788– 

61–2); and soybean oil, methyl esters 

(CASRN 67784–80–9) because the 

Agency has concluded it has low 

current interest in the processing and 

use information for these chemical 

substances. EPA made these 

determinations based on its analysis of 

the totality of information available on 

the six chemical substances, including 

information about the chemical 

substances relevant to the 

considerations defined at 40 CFR 

711.6(b)(2)(ii). EPA’s chemical 

substance-specific analysis is detailed in 

supplementary documents available in 

the docket under docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–0809 (Refs. 4, 5, 

6, 7, 8, and 9). 

V. Response to Comment 

The Agency reviewed and considered 

both comments received related to the 

direct final rule and the proposed rule. 

Comment 1: The commenter states 

that methyl esters can degrade to 

methanol, and provides references to 

support this statement. The commenter 

questioned how the possible existence 

of methanol from methyl esters can be 

ignored as ‘‘a hazard for human health 

and the environment.’’ 

EPA Response: EPA is aware that 

some methanol may be formed when 

methyl esters degrade. However, under 

both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, 

such methanol is itself rapidly degraded 

(Ref. 10). Therefore, EPA does not 

expect exposure to methanol from use of 

the six biofuels included in this petition 

for partial exemption. Note also that the 

inclusion of a chemical substance under 

this partial exemption is not a 

determination on the potential risks of 

a chemical substance. Rather, it is a 

determination that there is a low current 

interest in CDR processing and use 

information for that substance. Hazard 

alone is not determinative of the level 

of interest in such information. Other 

pertinent factors include the 

information needs of various parties and 

the current availability of comparable 

processing and use information. The 

commenter did not assert that he had a 

particular need for additional CDR 

information about the processing and 

use of these chemical substances. Nor 

did he dispute EPA’s characterization of 

the currently available processing and 

use information. If the level of interest 

in the CDR processing and use 

information for any listed chemical 

substance were to change after final 

listing, EPA may reevaluate the listing 

decision and pursue amendment of the 

listing as appropriate. 

Comment 2: The Biobased and 

Renewable Advocacy Group (BRAG), 

the group that submitted the petitions to 

EPA for these chemical substances, 

submitted a comment on the proposed 

rule in support of adding these chemical 

substances to the list at 40 CFR 

711.6(b)(2)(iv). BRAG’s comment stated 

that these chemical substances should 

be treated similarly to the petroleum 

products included in 40 CFR 711.6(b)(1) 

due to the conditions of manufacture 

and the properties and uses of the 

substances. The commenter also notes 

that based on the considerations listed 

at 40 CFR 711.6(b)(2)(ii) ‘‘a partial 

reporting exemption does not require 

that EPA determine that an affected 

substance poses neither hazard nor 

toxicity.’’ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

17394 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA Response: This partial exemption 

decision is based on the considerations 

described under 40 CFR 711.6(b)(2)(ii). 

EPA has made no determination 

whether any of the six chemical 

substances should be, as the commenter 

BRAG suggested, treated similarly to the 

petroleum products included in 40 CFR 

711.6(b)(1) due to the conditions of 

manufacture and the properties and 

uses of the substances. This latter issue 

is moot because equivalent partial 

exemptions are being granted under 40 

CFR 711.6(b)(2)(ii). 

EPA agrees that in this action it is not 

making a determination of the potential 

risks of the six chemical substances. 

VI. Economic Impacts 

EPA has evaluated the economic 

consequences associated with amending 

the CDR partially exempt chemical 

substances list. Since this final rule 

creates a partial exemption from CDR 

reporting, without creating any new 

reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements, this action does not 

impose any new burden. Based on the 

currently approved Information 

Collection Request (ICR), the burden 

estimates for reporting processing and 

use information total 65.63 hours with 

an associated cost of $4,367 per 

submission. Based on 2012 CDR 

reporting, EPA estimates that 61 

submissions with manufacture volumes 

of 25,000 pounds or greater will be 

received for these chemical substances 

in 2016 and subsequent reporting years. 

Eliminating the requirement to report 

processing and use information for these 

submissions results in a total burden 

savings of approximately 4,003 hours 

and $266,387 in future reporting cycles 

(Ref. 11). 

VII. References 

The following is a listing of the 

documents that are specifically 

referenced in this document. The docket 

includes these documents and other 

information considered by EPA, 

including documents that are referenced 

within the documents that are included 

in the docket, even if the referenced 

document is not physically located in 

the docket. For assistance in locating 

these other documents, please consult 

the technical person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

1. EPA. TSCA Inventory Update Rule 

Amendments; Final Rule. Federal 

Register (68 FR 848, January 7, 2003) 

(FRL–6767–4). 

2. Letter from Biobased and Renewable 

Products Advocacy Group, to EPA, OPPT 

CDR Submission Coordinator, October 

21, 2014. Docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPPT–2014–0809, regarding request for 

exemption of biodiesel products. 

3. Letter from Biobased and Renewable 

Products Advocacy Group, to EPA, OPPT 

CDR Submission Coordinator, November 

5, 2014. Docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPPT–2014–0809, supplement to request 

for exemption of biodiesel products. 

4. EPA, OPPT. Fatty acids, C14–18 and C16– 

18 unsaturated, methyl esters (CASRN 

67762–26–9) Partial Exemption Analysis. 

December 2014. 

5. EPA, OPPT. Fatty acids, C16–18 and C–18 

unsaturated, methyl esters (CASRN 

67762–38–3) Partial Exemption Analysis. 

December 2014. 

6. EPA, OPPT. Fatty acids, canola oil, methyl 

esters (CASRN 129828–16–6) Partial 

Exemption Analysis. December 2014. 

7. EPA, OPPT. Fatty acids, corn oil, methyl 

esters (CASRN 515152–40–6) Partial 

Exemption Analysis. December 2014. 

8. EPA, OPPT. Fatty acids, tallow, methyl 

esters (CASRN 61788–61–2) Partial 

Exemption Analysis. December 2014. 

9. EPA, OPPT. Soybean oil, methyl esters 

(CASRN 67784–80–9) Partial Exemption 

Analysis. December 2014. 

10. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2004. SIDS 

(Screening Information Data Set) Initial 

Assessment Report: Methanol. SIAM 19. 

Berlin, Germany, 18–20 October, 2004. 

11. EPA, OPPT. Cost Savings Estimate of 

Adding Six Chemicals to the 40 CFR 

711.6(b)(2)(iv) List of Chemical 

Substances. December 2015. 

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Additional information about these 

statutes and Executive Orders can be 

found at http://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders. 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a significant 

regulatory action and was therefore not 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review under 

Executive Orders 12866, October 4, 

1993 (58 FR 51735) and 13563, January 

21, 2011 (76 FR 3821). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

This action does not impose any new 

information collection requirements that 

would require additional review or 

approval by OMB under the PRA, 44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 

The information collection 

requirements related to CDR have 

already been approved by OMB 

pursuant to the PRA under OMB control 

number 2070–0162 (EPA ICR No. 

1884.08). Since this action creates a 

partial exemption from that reporting, 

without creating any new reporting or 

recordkeeping requirements, this action 

does not impose any new burdens that 

require additional OMB approval. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

I certify that this action will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. In 

making this determination, the impact 

of concern is any significant adverse 

economic impact on small entities. An 

agency may certify that a rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities if 

the rule has no net burden effect or 

otherwise has a positive economic effect 

on the small entities subject to the rule. 

As indicated previously, EPA is 

eliminating an existing reporting 

requirement for the chemical identified 

in this document. In granting a partial 

exemption from existing reporting, this 

final rule does not have a significant 

economic impact on any affected 

entities, regardless of their size. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA) 

This action does not contain an 

unfunded mandate of $100 million or 

more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 

1531–1538, and does not significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. In 

granting a partial exemption from 

existing reporting, this action imposes 

no new enforceable duty on any State, 

local or tribal governments, or on the 

private sector. In addition, based on 

EPA’s experience with chemical data 

reporting under TSCA, State, local, and 

Tribal governments are not engaged in 

the activities that would require them to 

report chemical data under 40 CFR part 

711. Accordingly, this action is not 

subject to the requirements of UMRA, 2 

U.S.C. 1501 et seq. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132, August 10, 1999 (64 FR 

43255). It will not have substantial 

direct effects on States, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. Thus, Executive 

Order 13132 does not apply to this 

action. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have Tribal 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13175, November 9, 2000 (65 FR 

67249). This action will not have any 

effect on Tribal governments, on the 

relationship between the Federal 

Government and the Indian Tribes, on 

the distribution of power and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 17395 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian Tribes. Thus 

Executive Order 13175 does not apply 

to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045, April 23, 1997 (62 FR 19885) as 

applying only to those regulatory 

actions that concern environmental 

health or safety risks that the EPA has 

reason to believe may 

disproportionately affect children, per 

the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 

action’’ in section 2–202 of the 

Executive Order. This action is not 

subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it does not concern an 

environmental health risk or safety risk. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, May 22, 2001 (66 FR 

28355), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

the consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to 

NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272 

note. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

This action does not involve special 

considerations of environmental justice 

related issues as specified in Executive 

Order 12898, February 16, 1994 (59 FR 

7629). This action does not address 

human health or environmental risks or 

otherwise have any disproportionate 

high and adverse human health or 

environmental effects on minority or 

low-income or indigenous populations. 

IX. Congressional Review Act (CRA) 

This action is subject to the CRA, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA will submit 

a rule report to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. This action is not 

a ‘‘major’’ rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 711 

Environmental protection, Chemicals, 

Hazardous substances, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: March 22, 2016. 

Wendy C. Hamnett, 

Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and 

Toxics. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 711—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 711 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(a). 

■ 2. In § 711.6, add in numerical order 

by CASRN number the following entries 

to Table 2 in paragraph (b)(2)(iv). 

§ 711.6 Chemical substances for which 

information is not required. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(iv) * * * 

TABLE 2—CASRN OF PARTIALLY EXEMPT CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

CASRN Chemical 

*******

61788–61–2 .................................... Fatty acids, tallow, methyl esters. 

*******

67762–26–9 .................................... Fatty acids, C14–18 and C16–18 unsaturated, methyl esters. 

67762–38–3 .................................... Fatty acids, C16–18 and C–18 unsaturated, methyl esters. 

67784–80–9 .................................... Soybean oil, methyl esters. 

*******

129828–16–6 .................................. Fatty acids, canola oil, methyl esters. 

515152–40–6 .................................. Fatty acids, corn oil, methyl esters. 

[FR Doc. 2016–07086 Filed 3–28–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2016–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8427] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP) that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 

adopted the required floodplain 

management measures prior to the 

effective suspension date given in this 

rule, the suspension will not occur and 

a notice of this will be provided by 

publication in the Federal Register on a 

subsequent date. Also, information 

identifying the current participation 

status of a community can be obtained 

from FEMA’s Community Status Book 

(CSB). The CSB is available at http://

www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm. 

DATES: The effective date of each 

community’s scheduled suspension is 

the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the 

third column of the following tables. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you want to determine whether a 

particular community was suspended 

on the suspension date or for further 

information, contact Patricia Suber, 

Federal Insurance and Mitigation 

Administration, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP 

enables property owners to purchase 

Federal flood insurance that is not 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES