alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ATTORNEYGRIEVANCECOMMISSIONIN

## THEOF

# MARYLANDCOURTOF

## APPEALSOF

# MARYLANDPetitioner,Misc. 

### Docket

# AG N0. 35

v.



### September Term, 

### 2017



# MATTHEWPETER

# GORMAN

Respondent.

# ORDER

This matter 

### came before the 

### Court

### on the JointPetition 

### 0f the Attorney 

### Grievance



### Commission 0f 

### Maryland and Respondent, 

### MatthewPeter 

### German, t0 disbar the



### Respondent from the practice 

### 0f law. 

### The Court having

considered thePetition,itis this 

# _

day 0f October, 201 8, 

### by the Court 

### 0f 

### Appeals 0f Maryland;

## ORDERED, that Respondent, 

### MatthewPeter 

### German, be, 

### and he herebyis,

disbarred 

### from the practice of 

### lawin the

State of 

### Maryland for violation 0f 

### Rule 8.4(a) 

### —

(d) 0f the 

### Maryland Lawyers’ Rules 

### of Professional Conduct; 

### anditis further

## ORDERED, that the Clerk 

### of this Court shall 

### remove the 

### name 0f 

### MatthewPeter



### Gorman from the register 

### 0f attorneysin this Court 

### and certify that fact t0 the Trustees 0f

the ClientProtection 

### Fund of the 

### Bar 

### ofMaryland and all Clerks 0f all judicial tribunalsin

this Statein accordance with 

### Maryland Rule 19—736(d).
Order entered June 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00985-CV

ALAA MOHAMAMD WEISS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. M0474358

ORDER

This is an appeal from the trial court’s “Order dated July 26, 2018.” That order denied 

appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for nondisclosure. Both the clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed, triggering the deadline for 

appellant to file his brief on the merits. Before the Court is appellant’s June 18, 2019 motion for 

extension of time to file his brief. We note, however, that it appears we may not have 

jurisdiction over the appeal. 

By letter dated June 6, 2019 and filed in an amended supplemental clerk’s record, Dallas 

County Clerk John F. Warren has informed us no order on the petition for non-disclosure has 

been signed. Because appellate jurisdiction is invoked upon the timely filing of a notice of 

appeal from a signed final judgment or order that is being appealed, we ORDER appellant to 
file, no later than July 1, 2019, a letter brief addressing the Court’s jurisdiction. See Lehman v. 

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 907 S.W.2d 495, 

496 (Tex. 1995). Appellee may file any response within ten days of the filing of appellant’s 

letter brief. If any party relies on information not included in the record before the Court, that 

party shall have filed a supplemental clerk’s record. 

We DENY appellant’s extension motion as premature and SUSPEND the briefing 

deadline. Should we determine we have jurisdiction over the appeal, we will set a new deadline 

for appellant to file his brief. Should we determine we lack jurisdiction, we will dismiss the 

appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). We may also dismiss the appeal 

should appellant fail to file the requested letter brief. See id. 42.3(a),(c). 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30528]


      
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

21 CFR Part 1308

[DEA Number 162C]


Schedules of Controlled Substances: Proposed Removal of 
Fenfluramine From the Controlled Substances Act; Correction

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-12955, appearing on page 27214, in the 
issue of Monday, May 19, 1997, in the second column, in the second full 
paragraph, in the ninth line, ``June 5, 1997'' should read ``June 18, 
1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


August 2, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 332


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on August 1, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-218550) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/
GERARDO CIPRIANO


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
EXHIBIT 31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Mark B. Lucky, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of ICEWEB, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)          disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  5.           The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 16, 2011  By:  /s/ Mark B. LuckyMark B. LuckyChief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
Order entered June 7, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-01256-CV

KELLEY & WITHERSPOON, LLP, ET AL, Appellants

V.

JEANETTE HOOPER, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-03060-E

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s Agreed Motion to Accelerate Issuance of Mandate. We direct 

the Clerk of the Court to issue the mandate forthwith.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
# L_2004326EN.01004401.xml

| 29.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/44

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1885/2004

of 28 October 2004

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 22 to 28 October 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be EUR 31,95/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
This media is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the 

EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a 

copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made as 

follows:

In person/writing: 

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 

Washington, DC. 20004 

Telephone: 

202-566-1744

Fax:

202-566- 9744

Email: 

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
This media is not available in 

Regulations.gov. 

For further information please contact:

Marcus Sarofim 

USEPA - Climate Change Division 

sarofim.marcus@epa.gov 

202-343-9993
Sanyia S. BOOTH, Appellant, v. Carl E. BOOTH, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Transport of atrazine versus bromide and δO18 in sand      

      August 22, 2016    

The objective of this research was to determine the process of atrazine transport compared to bromide and δO18 transport in sands near Denver. Three 1.5 × 2 × 1.5-m plots were installed and allowed to equilibrate for 2 years before research initiation and were instrumented with 1.5 × 2-m zero-tension pan lysimeters installed at 1.5-m depths. Additionally, each plot was instrumented with suction lysimeters, tensiometers, time domain reflectometry (TDR) moisture probes, and thermocouples (to measure soil temperature) at 15-cm depth increments. All plots were enclosed with a raised frame (of 8-cm height) to prevent surface runoff. During the 2-year period before research began, all suction and pan lysimeters were purged monthly and were sampled for fluids immediately prior to atrazine and KBr application to obtain background concentrations. Atrazine illustrated little movement until after a significant rainfall event, which peaked concentrations at depths of about 90 to 135 cm. Both Br− and δO18 moved rapidly through the soil, probably owing to soil porosity and anion exclusion for Br−. Concentrations of atrazine exceeding 5.0 μL−1 were observed with depth (90 to 150 cm) after several months. It appears that significant rainfall events were a key factor in the movement of atrazine in the sand, which allowed the chemicals to move to greater depths and thus avoid generally found biodegradation processes.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Robert Holmes, Jr., Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, F.EWRI, D.WRE (Former Employee)          

##### Chief, Hydrodynamics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

##### Chief, Water Cycle Branch (acting)

Water Resources Mission Area

## Related Content

####             Robert Holmes, Jr., Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, F.EWRI, D.WRE (Former Employee)          

##### Chief, Hydrodynamics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

##### Chief, Water Cycle Branch (acting)

Water Resources Mission Area

### Contacts

####             Robert Holmes, Jr., Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, F.EWRI, D.WRE (Former Employee)          

##### Chief, Hydrodynamics Branch

Water Resources Mission Area

##### Chief, Water Cycle Branch (acting)

Water Resources Mission Area
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5028 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5028

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 10721 E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Mary E. McCoy 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARY E. MCCOY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10721 E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mary E. McCoy Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mary E. 
McCoy Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5028

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 10721 E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Mary E. McCoy 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
^^,TEDSTA^ ^^ 7i ^

^ A L p^0TE° ' UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

The Honorable Paul R. LePage Governor of Maine I State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0001 Dear Governor LePage: Thank you for your letter of July 23, 2013, to Deputy Administrator Perciasepe regarding Maine's recent enactment of legislation calling for the use of reformulated gasoline in several Maine counties. You requested, pursuant to section 211(k)(6)(B) of the Clean Air Act, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency extend the requirement for the sale of RFG to York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox and Lincoln counties in Maine beginning May 1, 2014. In keeping with that section of the Act, we will publish your request in the 

### Federal Register and solicit public comments as part of a federal rulemaking process to require RFG in these areas. We also understand that if the EPA grants your request to extend the sale of RFG to the above-listed counties, you plan to submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requesting removal of the existing state 7.8 Reid Vapor Pressure fuel requirements for these counties in the Maine SIP. Our EPA Region 1 office in Boston will work with the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to address any changes to the SIP. As a next step, our EPA Region I office will contact the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and coordinate your request with our Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Again, thank you for your letter and for the steps you are taking to improve air quality and public health in Maine. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact me or your staff may contact Mark Rupp, Deputy Associate Administrator for Intergovernmental Relations, at rupp.mark(depa.gov , or at (202) 564-7178.
S. rely,

ma McCarthy

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epagov Recycled/Recyclable S Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
Macy Courtney Betzold WHEELOCK, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: Guardianship of Yvonne BETZOLD, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Potential effects of a scenario earthquake on the economy of southern California: Baseline county-level migration characteristics and trends 1995-2000 and 2001-2010      

      September 18, 2008    

The Multi-Hazards Demonstration Project (MHDP) is a collaboration between the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and various partners from the public and private sectors and academia, meant to improve Southern California's resiliency to natural hazards. In support of the MHDP objectives, the ShakeOut Scenario was developed. It describes a magnitude 7.8 earthquake along the southernmost 300 kilometers (200 miles) of the San Andreas Fault, identified by geoscientists as a plausible event that will cause moderate to strong shaking over much of the eight-county (Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura) Southern California region. This report uses historical, estimated, and projected population data from several Federal and State data sources to estimate baseline characteristics and trends of the region's population migration (that is, changes in a person's place of residence over time). The analysis characterizes migration by various demographic, economic, family, and household variables for the period 1995-2000. It also uses existing estimates (beginning in 2001) of the three components of population change - births, deaths, and migration - to extrapolate near-term projections of county-level migration trends through 2010. The 2010 date was chosen to provide baseline projections corresponding to a two-year recovery period following the November 2008 date that was selected for the occurrence of the ShakeOut Scenario earthquake. The baseline characteristics and projections shall assist with evaluating the effects of inflow and outflow migration trends for alternative futures in which the simulated M7.8 earthquake either does or does not occur and the impact of the event on housing and jobs, as well as community composition and regional economy changes based on dispersion of intellectual, physical, economic, and cultural capital.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-ASW-01]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Zuni, MN

Correction

    In rule document 96-15646 appearing on page 31013 in the issue of 
Wednesday, June 19, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 31013, in the third column, in Sec. 71.1, under ASW NM E5 
Zuni, NM [Revised], in the seventh line, insert ``Rock'' after 
``Black''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
James THOMPSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0276

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Randy PATTERSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ALBERICI CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.