alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2

                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                                  STRAIGHT NOTE
                            Newport Beach, California


$754,922                                         Restated:     September 1, 2002

This  Amends,  Restates  and  Extends all prior Notes from Borrower to Holder as
follow:

FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  Newport  Federal  Financial,  a  California  corporation
("Borrower") promises to pay to the order of Advantage America, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and California Finance Lender, ("Holder"), or order at 4425 Jamboree
Road,  Newport  Beach,  California  92660,  the  sum of Seven Hundred Fifty-Four
Thousand  Nine Hundred Twenty-Two and 00/100 Dollars ($754,922.00) with interest
from  August  31,  2002  until  paid  at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum
payable                  (see below)                       :
        ---------------------------------------------------

       This  Note  is  due  and payable without demand or notice in full
       including  all  accrued  and  unpaid  principal  and  interest on
       NOVEMBER  14,  2002  ("Maturity"). This Note may be paid or drawn
       upon  at  any time until Maturity. Monthly payments calculated at
       interest  only  shall  be made by Borrower by the 1st day of each
       month  in  arrears.


Should  interest  not  be so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the
principal,  but  such  unpaid  interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount
equal  to  simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted
by  law.  Should  default  be made in the payment of any installment of interest
when  due, then the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately
due  and  payable  at  the  option  of  the Holder of this Note.  Should suit be
commenced  to collect this Note or any potion thereof, such sum as the Court may
deem  reasonable  shall  be  added  hereto  as  attorney's  fees.  Principal and
interest  is payable in lawful money of the United States of America.  This note
is  secured  by  a  certain DEED OF TRUST to the FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF
ORANGE  COUNTY,  a  California  corporation,  as  Trustee.


"BORROWER"

Newport Federal Financial, a California corporation


By:  /s/ Chad Horning
     ---------------------------
     Chad Horning, President


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Kingold Jewelry, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Zhihong JiaZhihong Jia

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 31, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kingold Jewelry, Inc. and will be retained by Kingold Jewelry, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 31190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10606]



Federal Register/Vol. 62, No. 109/Friday, June 6, 1997/Corrections

[[Page 31190]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Availability of Appealable Decisions

Correction

    In notice document 97-9709 beginning on page 18582 in the issue of 
Wednesday, April 16, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 18583, in the second column, the Sedona District section 
should read ``Sedona District: Red Rock News, published weekly 
Wednesday and Friday in Sedona, Coconino County, Arizona.''
    2. On page 18583, in the second column, the The Arizona Daily Star 
section should read ``The Arizona Daily Star, published daily, Monday-
Sunday, in Tucson, Pima County, Arizona.''
    3. On page 18583, in the second column, the Douglas District 
section should read ``Douglas District: Daily Dispatch, published daily 
Tuesday-Friday, and Sunday in Douglas, Cochise County, Arizona.''
    4. On page 18583, in the second column, the Nogales District 
section should read ``Nogales District: Nogales International, 
published weekly on Tuesday and Friday in Nogales, Santa Cruz County, 
Arizona.''
    5. On page 18583, in the second column, the Safford District 
section should read ``Safford District: Eastern Arizona Courier, 
published weekly on Wednesday, in Safford, Graham County, Arizona.''
    6. On page 18585, in the first column, the Dated Line should read
    ``April 3, 1997.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 19-23503-LMI Doc 13 Filed 10/21/19 Page 1 of 4
3600 MYSTIC POINTE DR #1814 Miami FL 33180

Case 19-23503-LMI Doc 13 Filed 10/21/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-23503-LMI Doc 13 Filed 10/21/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-23503-LMI Doc 13 Filed 10/21/19 Page 4 of 4
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 27, 2010 

d0920 

Order 

 

September 27, 2010 

141306 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141306 

 COA: 289875 

Wayne CC: 08-010353-FC 

DREMARIS ANDREW JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Surveying the South Pole-Aitken basin magnetic anomaly for remnant impactor metallic iron      

      November 15, 2014    

The Moon has areas of magnetized crust ("magnetic anomalies"), the origins of which are poorly constrained. A magnetic anomaly near the northern rim of South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin was recently postulated to originate from remnant metallic iron emplaced by the SPA basin-forming impactor. Here, we remotely examine the regolith of this SPA magnetic anomaly with a combination of Clementine and Lunar Prospector derived iron maps for any evidence of enhanced metallic iron content. We find that these data sets do not definitively detect the hypothesized remnant metallic iron within the upper tens of centimeters of the lunar regolith.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Justin Hagerty, Ph.D.

##### Science Center Director

Astrogeology Science Center

jhagerty@usgs.gov

928-556-7173

## Related Content

#### Justin Hagerty, Ph.D.

##### Science Center Director

Astrogeology Science Center

jhagerty@usgs.gov

928-556-7173

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Moon; South Pole-Aitken basin
                  - moon
                  -  South Pole-Aitken basin

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Relatedness within and among Myotis septentrionalis colonies at a local scale      

      March 21, 2019    

Abstract:  We assessed parentage within and among maternity colonies of the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis Troessart 1897) in north-central Kentucky from 2011–2013 to better understand colony social structure, formation, and membership dynamics. We intensively sampled colonies in close and remote (> 10 km) spatial proximity both before and after targeted day-roost removal. Colonies were not necessarily comprised of closely related individuals, but natal philopatry was common. Adjacent colonies often contained maternally related individuals, indicating that some pups did disperse, albeit not far from their natal home range. Lack of apparent overlap among maternity colonies, along with no observed individual movements between colonies, suggests that colonies may be relatively closed once established in the maternity season.  Whereas some young on site had been sired by males collected on site that by chance had dispersed to the same summering grounds, most had not, as would be expected since the species mates in the fall swarms near hibernacula. The number of parentages that we inferred among colonies, however, suggests that outside the maternity season, social groups may be relatively flexible and open, with individuals moving among groups close to their natal area. Analysis of microsatellite DNA data showed a low FST (= 0.011) and best fit to a model of one multilocus genotypic cluster across the study area.  We observed high turnover in colony membership between years in all colonies, regardless of roost removal treatment. Our results suggest that female northern long-eared bats exhibit fidelity to a general geographic area rather than individual colonies between years, and indicate presence of a complex and dynamic social-genetic structure. Greater understanding of colony dynamics, including formation, dissolution, and dispersal patterns, may contribute to conservation and management of this threatened species.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Ford, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

wford@usgs.gov

540-231-5927

## Related Content

#### Mark Ford, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

wford@usgs.gov

540-231-5927

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Kentucky

View All **
Lawrence A. BETHEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

Lawrence A. Bethel, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Wetherell, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
1

Stout, Alan

From: Stout, Alan

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:48 AM

To: Glodich, Jeffrey (J.M.)

Cc: Fernandez, Antonio

Subject: RE: Alternate PM Phase-in

Jeff, 

We came across that just recently. The standard phase-in is based on projected sales, which should be clearly described 

in both the preamble and the regulations. The alternate phase-in needs to be based on actual sales. We have modified 

the preamble for the final rule to align with the proposed regulatory text. The same question (and answer) applies for 

the HD PM phase-in. 

Let us know if you have further questions. 

Alan 

From: Glodich, Jeffrey (J.M.) [mailto:jglodich@ford.com] 

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:01 AM 

To: Stout, Alan; Fernandez, Antonio 

Subject: Alternate PM Phase-in 

Tony, Alan, 

 

Could you clarify whether the alternate LD PM phase-in is based on projected (anticipated) or actual volumes? The 

NPRM language appears to be inconsistent. 

 

Note: For LEV3 it is based on projected. 

 

Page numbers are from original NPRM pdf (not later CFR version). 

 

Page 138: 

The proposed mathematical equation for applying the optional PM phase-in is as follows: 

(5 x APP2017) + (4 x APP2018) + (3 x APP2019) + (2 x APP2020) + (1 x APP2021) ≥540, where APP is the anticipated

phase-in percentage for the 

referenced model year. 

 

Page 645: 

(b)(6)(i) You must meet the FTP and the US06 PM standards with 20, 20, 40, 70, and

100 percent of your projected nationwide sales of all vehicles subject to this

section in model years 2017 through 2021, respectively. Each vehicle meeting the

Tier 3 FTP standard for PM must also meet the Tier 3 US06 standard for PM. In

model year 2017, the phase-in requirement applies only for vehicles at or below

6,000 pounds GVWR; however, if you certify these vehicles to the Tier 3 PM

standards in the model year 2017, you may count those projected U.S. sales

toward your calculation for meeting the phase-in percentage for that year

(numerator only).

 

Page 646: 

 
2

APP = The actual phase-in percentage of vehicles meeting the Tier 3 PM

standards for the indicated model year, based on actual sales, as described in

paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section.

 

Thanks, 

Jeff 

 

Jeff Glodich 

Ford Motor Company 

Vehicle Environmental Regulatory Strategy and Planning 

217-E4 WHQ 

(313) 845-1579
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4761 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, 

California, as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4761 EH

1 SECTION 1. LOUIS VAN IERSEL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Si4 erra Madre, California, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4761 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostIersel Post Office’’. in Sierra Madre, California, as the ‘‘Louis Van al Service located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue
Case 20-20403-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-20403-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 2
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 08-1672

________________ United States of America, Appellee,

v. Shamico Peters, Appellant. * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [PUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: April 18, 2008 Filed: April 29, 2008

________________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. Shamico Peters appeals the district court's 1 denial of his motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (USSG), which reducedthe base offense levels in USSG § 2D1.1(c) based on the quantity of cocaine base (crack).-2- Mr. Peters' originally calculated guide lines range was 121 to 151 months, and he received a sentence of 120 months, the statutory mandatory minimum sentence for the quantity of crack involved in his conviction. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(b). In considering a reduction to a defendant's te rm of imprisonment under § 3582(c)(2), the district court must determine the guidelines range as if the relevant amendment had been in place at the time of the original sentencing, and it may consider only the retroactive amendment in determini ng the amended guidelines range. See United States v. Hasan , 245 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 905 (2001); USSG § 1B1.10(b)(1) (Suppl. Mar. 3, 2008). In Mr. Peters' case, application of the new drug quantity guidelines would ha ve resulted in a gui delines range of 120 to 121 months. See USSG § 5G1.1(c)(2) (setting th e bottom of the guidelines range at the statutory mandatory minimum when it would otherwise be below the mandatory minimum). Mr. Peters was not entitled to a reduction of his 120-month sentence. See § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) (district court may not reduce the defendant's sentence below the minimum of the amended guidelines range); id. , comment. (n.1(A)(ii)) (reduction not authorized if the retroactive amendment does not lower the defendant's applicable guidelines range because of a statutory provision, e.g. , a statutory mandatory minimum sentence).
To the extent Mr. Peters asked the district court to reconsider his criminal history score pursuant to Amendment 709, that amendment is not a covered amendment under § 1B1.10 to which retro active treatment may be given. See § 1B1.10(c). Further, as a part of this § 3582(c) proceeding, the district court was not allowed to address any allege d "clear error" which may have occurred at the original sentencing in determining the number of criminal history points allocated to another prior conviction. See Hasan , 245 F.3d at 685. Mr. Peters was and is not entitled to safety valve relief, but he is subject to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence that he received.-3- The district court's judgment denying Mr . Peters any relief pursuant to the retroactive amendments is summarily affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11208]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 64634]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 101


Food Labeling; Statement of Identity, Nutrition Labeling and 
Ingredient Labeling of Dietary Supplements; Compliance Policy Guide, 
Revocation

Correction

    In rule document 97-24739 beginning on page 49826, in the issue of 
Tuesday, September 23, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 101.4  [Corrected]

    On page 49848, in Sec. 101.4(h)(1), in the first column, in the 
first line, ``pressed'' should read ``be expressed''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

58616

Vol. 61, No. 222

Friday, November 15, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Availability of Non-Exclusive,

Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive

Liscensing of Tank Weapon

Technology

Correction

Notice document 96–28994 beginning

on page 58281 in the issue of

Wednesday, November 13, 1996 was

inadvertently printed in the issue.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Simulating the impact of human land use change on forest composition in the Great Plains agroecosystems with the Seedscape model      

      January 1, 2001    

The expansion and contraction of marginal cropland in the Great Plains often involves small forested strips of land that provide important ecological benefits. The effect of human disturbance on these forests is not well known. Because of their unique structure such forests are not well-represented by forest gap models. In this paper, the development, testing and application of a new model known as Seedscape are described. Seedscape is a modification of the JABOWA-II model, and it uses a spatially-explicit landscape to resolve small-scale features of highly fragmented forests in the eastern Great Plains. It was tested and evaluated with observations from two sites, one in Nebraska and a second in eastern Iowa. Seedscape realistically simulates succession at the Nebraska site, but is less successful at the Iowa site. Seedscape was also applied to the Nebraska site to simulate the effect that varying forest corridor widths, in response to the presumed expansion/contraction of adjacent agricultural land, has on succession properties. Results suggest that small differences in widths have negligible effects on forest composition, but large differences in widths may cause statistically-significant changes in the relative importance of some species. We assert that long-term ecological change in human dominated landscapes is not well understood, in part, because of inadequate modeling techniques. Seedscape provides a much-needed tool for assessing the ecological implications of land use change in forests of predominately agricultural landscapes.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Cedar River
                  -  Great Plains
                  -  Red Cedar Wildlife Area
                  -  University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center
                  - iowa
                  -  Nebraska

View All **
Duane Eugene OWEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC18-382

Supreme Court of Florida.

[June 26, 2018]

James Vincent Viggiano, Jr., Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, James L. Driscoll, Jr., David Dixon Hendry, and Gregory W. Brown, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Middle Region, Temple Terrace, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Celia A. Terenzio, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

*395We have for review Duane Eugene Owen's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Owen's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Owen's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida* , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). Owen responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Owen's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Owen is not entitled to relief. Owen was sentenced to death following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of ten to two. *Owen v. State* , 596 So.2d 985, 987 (Fla. 1992). His sentence of death became final in 1992. *Owen v. Florida* , 506 U.S. 921, 113 S.Ct. 338, 121 L.Ed.2d 255 (1992). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Owen's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock* , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Owen's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Owen, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock* .