alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Richard Hornstein, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. for the period ended September 30, 2004;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 9, 2004
    /s/ Richard HornsteinRichard HornsteinChief Financial Officer 42
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: ANA L. MEDINA CASE NUMBER: 20-13160-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for August 25, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the August 25, 2020 

hearing were due as of August 7, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

3AP served 6/25

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service and agrees on the record:

Remains unresolved from prior deficiency

Due by 5 pm on 8/27 or Dismiss, if received Cont to 9/15: 1) Amend Plan to fund properly

Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 40 Filed 08/19/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF VINCENT JAMES LUPARELL 

FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN 

THE BAR OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Vincent James Luparell has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State 

Bar of Montana. Luparell was placed on inactive status by the State Bar of Montana 

pursuant to Rules 3B2, 5, and 13 of the Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) on 

June 30, 2024, as a result of noncompliance with CLE requirements. In accordance with 

Rule 13 of the CLE Rules, Luparell has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that 

Luparell has now completed all CLE requirements "through the reporting year that ended 

March 31, 2024." 

The Petition indicates Luparell is or has not been: 1) suspended, disbarred, or 

otherwise ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction and is not currently subject to 

disciplinary proceedings or pending disciplinary proceedings in another jurisdiction, 

2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or filed for bankruptcy, 

4) failed to fulfill the obligations of a public office or professional license, or 5) committed 

any violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Vincent James Luparell for 

reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this- day of September, 2024. 

Chief Justice 

09/03/2024

Case Number: PR 06-0544
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 2, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 14596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40402]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-943-1430-01; IDI-07135]


Public Land Order 7190; Revocation of Public Land Order No. 6010; 
Idaho

Correction

    In notice document 96-7056 beginning on page 12085 in the issue of 
Monday, March 25, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 12085, in the third column, the public land order 
heading should read as set forth above.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, under SUMMARY:, in the 
fourth line, ``Management's'' was misspelled.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Gregory RAGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3357

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2004266EN.01000701.xml

| 13.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1443/2004

of 12 August 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 2nd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2nd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 47,280 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 August 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23.

2

---
Christopher MILLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 20, 2018

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, Orlando, and Peter C. Schmer, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

*295The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the May 30, 2018 judgment and sentences rendered in Case No. 2016-CF-7640-A-O, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifying postfire aeolian sediment transport using rare earth element tracers      

      January 1, 2018    

Grasslands, which provide fundamental ecosystem services in many arid and semiarid regions of the world, are undergoing rapid increases in fire activity and are highly susceptible to postfire-accelerated soil erosion by wind. A quantitative assessment of physical processes that integrates fire-wind erosion feedbacks is therefore needed relative to vegetation change, soil biogeochemical cycling, air quality, and landscape evolution. We investigated the applicability of a novel tracer technique—the use of multiple rare earth elements (REE)—to quantify soil transport by wind and to identify sources and sinks of wind-blown sediments in both burned and unburned shrub-grass transition zone in the Chihuahuan Desert, NM, USA. Results indicate that the horizontal mass flux of wind-borne sediment increased approximately threefold following the fire. The REE tracer analysis of wind-borne sediments shows that the source of the horizontal mass flux in the unburned site was derived from bare microsites (88.5%), while in the burned site it was primarily sourced from shrub (42.3%) and bare (39.1%) microsites. Vegetated microsites which were predominantly sinks of aeolian sediments in the unburned areas became sediment sources following the fire. The burned areas showed a spatial homogenization of sediment tracers, highlighting a potential negative feedback on landscape heterogeneity induced by shrub encroachment into grasslands. Though fires are known to increase aeolian sediment transport, accompanying changes in the sources and sinks of wind-borne sediments may influence biogeochemical cycling and land degradation dynamics. Furthermore, our experiment demonstrated that REEs can be used as reliable tracers for field-scale aeolian studies.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092
Client: Anamar Location: 

Project: Jacksonville Habitat: Estuarine

Sample Date: September 2010

FAUNAL PARAMETERS

Mean No. of Taxa Mean H' d 1/S J' D

Date Total No. No. of Taxa per Repl. Total No. Density Density Shannon Diversity Simpson Pielou Margalef e

Station (m/d/y) Taxa per Repl. (Std Dev) Individuals (nos/m2) (Std Dev) (log e) (log 2) Diversity Evenness Richness Equitability

N01 9/21/2010 66 31.0 9.0 277 2308.3 1275.8 3.31 4.77 15.06 0.79 11.56 0.61

N02 9/21/2010 100 53.7 13.4 665 5541.7 1562.9 3.48 5.02 13.67 0.76 15.23 0.48

N03 9/21/2010 45 25.0 4.4 371 3091.7 548.5 2.52 3.63 5.34 0.66 7.44 0.39

N04 9/21/2010 91 42.3 7.4 347 2891.7 602.3 3.79 5.47 27.83 0.84 15.39 0.74

N06 9/21/2010 111 58.0 3.6 630 5250.0 66.1 3.61 5.20 12.26 0.77 17.07 0.50

N07 9/21/2010 106 53.3 0.6 569 4741.7 1168.4 3.39 4.90 10.32 0.73 16.55 0.42

N08 9/21/2010 98 51.3 9.5 562 4683.3 1318.2 3.73 5.38 21.43 0.81 15.32 0.64

N09 9/21/2010 97 52.0 7.0 534 4450.0 288.3 3.81 5.49 28.57 0.83 15.29 0.70

S01 9/21/2010 67 37.3 1.2 327 2725.0 326.9 3.53 5.10 20.40 0.84 11.40 0.76

S02 9/21/2010 123 58.7 27.1 648 5400.0 3292.4 4.02 5.80 33.76 0.83 18.84 0.69

S03 9/21/2010 95 52.3 3.5 710 5916.7 1978.8 3.38 4.88 13.23 0.74 14.32 0.46

S04 9/21/2010 100 50.3 9.7 524 4366.7 237.6 3.59 5.18 19.23 0.78 15.81 0.54

S05 9/21/2010 62 27.7 10.8 247 2058.3 1451.1 3.43 4.96 18.44 0.83 11.07 0.75

S08 9/21/2010 78 39.7 9.7 344 2866.7 1149.0 3.58 5.16 20.36 0.82 13.18 0.69

S06 9/21/2010 82 45.0 9.2 548 4566.7 1037.2 3.43 4.94 16.89 0.78 12.84 0.56

S07 9/21/2010 61 29.3 9.3 250 2083.3 973.5 3.36 4.85 17.70 0.82 10.87 0.71

S12 9/21/2010 66 32.3 9.2 328 2733.3 773.1 3.45 4.98 20.06 0.82 11.22 0.71

S13 9/21/2010 66 36.7 8.1 314 2616.7 1263.0 3.22 4.65 11.30 0.77 11.31 0.56

SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY PARAMETERS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Resist, accept, and direct responses to biological invasions: A social–ecological perspective      

      June 14, 2022    

Biological invasions represent an important and unique case of ecological transformation that can strongly influence species and entire ecosystems. Challenges in managing invasions arise on multiple fronts, ranging from diverse and often divergent values associated with native and introduced species, logistical constraints, and transformation via other change agents (e.g., climate and land-use change). We address biological invasions considering the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) framework for addressing ecological transformation. Because RAD is focused on decisions, we address both social and ecological factors that influence preferences for decision alternatives. We address social factors first as these can constrain the range of alternatives considered in an ecological context. Next, we address ecological dynamics by modeling trajectories from RAD alternatives in a two-species scenario involving impacts of introduced brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on native bull trout (S. confluentus). Results reveal that decision alternatives aligned with each of the major components of RAD can produce positive outcomes. In a management context, these findings highlight the value of investing in early engagement to fully identify decision alternatives, formalizing models of system dynamics to understand ecological trajectories, and applying this knowledge to set the stage for longer term efforts to address biological invasions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jason B Dunham

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

jdunham@usgs.gov

541-750-0990

#### Joseph R Benjamin

##### Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

jbenjamin@usgs.gov

208-387-1307

## Related Content

#### Jason B Dunham

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

jdunham@usgs.gov

541-750-0990

#### Joseph R Benjamin

##### Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

jbenjamin@usgs.gov

208-387-1307

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30785

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES CUVILLIER, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-199-6-J

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and PRADO, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Cuvillier, Sr., appeals his sentence following a

guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of

cocaine base and more than five kilograms of cocaine

hydrochloride. Cuvillier executed a plea agreement waiving

certain of his appellate rights; however, he reserved the right

to appeal “any punishment imposed in excess of the statutory

maximum.” Cuvillier’s sentence is based solely on facts to which

he stipulated in connection with his guilty plea. 
No.04-30785

-2-

Nevertheless, Cuvillier argues that his sentence exceeds the

statutory maximum sentence allowable under United States v.

Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because he did not knowingly and

voluntarily waive his rights under the Sixth Amendment when he

stipulated to the facts supporting his guilty plea. Thus, he

contends that the waiver provision in his plea agreement does not

bar his appeal. He further argues that he must be resentenced

because the district court’s belief that the sentencing

guidelines were mandatory prevented the court from considering

potential mitigating evidence. 

Our review of the record shows that Cuvillier’s waiver of

his appellate rights was knowing and voluntary. This appeal is

barred by the “plain language” of the waiver because Cuvillier’s

180-month term of imprisonment, which is based solely on his own

admissions, does not exceed the statutory maximum term of life

imprisonment that could have been imposed for the offense. 

United States v. McKinney __ F.3d __, No. 04-41223, 2005 WL

887153 at *2 (5th Cir. April 15, 2005); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A);

see Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 2537 (2004). 

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           United States National Seismic Hazard Maps      

      April 17, 2008    

The U.S. Geological Survey?s maps of earthquake shaking hazards provide information essential to creating and updating the seismic design provisions of building codes and insurance rates used in the United States. Periodic revisions of these maps incorporate the results of new research. Buildings, bridges, highways, and utilities built to meet modern seismic design provisions are better able to withstand earthquakes, not only saving lives but also enabling critical activities to continue with less disruption. These maps can also help people assess the hazard to their homes or places of work and can also inform insurance rates.

## Citation Information