alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                                  STRAIGHT NOTE
                            Newport Beach, California


$302,421                                         Restated:     September 1, 2002

This  Amends,  Restates  and  Extends all prior Notes from Borrower to Holder as
follow:

FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  Newport  Federal,  a  California corporation ("Borrower")
promises  to pay to the order of Advantage America, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and  California  Finance  Lender,  ("Holder"),  or  order at 4425 Jamboree Road,
Newport  Beach,  California  92660,  the  sum of Three Hundred Two Thousand Four
Hundred  Twenty-One  and  00/100 Dollars ($302,421.00) with interest from August
31,  2002  until  paid  at  the  rate  of  ten  percent  (10%) per annum payable
           (see below)                :
--------------------------------------

       This  Note  is  due  and payable without demand or notice in full
       including  all  accrued  and  unpaid  principal  and  interest on
       NOVEMBER  14,  2002  ("Maturity"). This Note may be paid or drawn
       upon  at  any time until Maturity. Monthly payments calculated at
       interest  only  shall  be made by Borrower by the 1st day of each
       month  in  arrears.


Should  interest  not  be so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the
principal,  but  such  unpaid  interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount
equal  to  simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted
by  law.  Should  default  be made in the payment of any installment of interest
when  due, then the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately
due  and  payable  at  the  option  of  the Holder of this Note.  Should suit be
commenced  to collect this Note or any potion thereof, such sum as the Court may
deem  reasonable  shall  be  added  hereto  as  attorney's  fees.  Principal and
interest  is payable in lawful money of the United States of America.  This note
is  secured  by  a  certain DEED OF TRUST to the FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF
ORANGE  COUNTY,  a  California  corporation,  as  Trustee.


"BORROWER"

Newport Federal, a California corporation


By:  /s/ Chad Horning
     ----------------------------
     Chad Horning, Vice President


<PAGE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 16, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1576 Lower Tribunal No. 07-11754

________________ 

### Alexander L. Green, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge. Alexander L. Green, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re: Case No.: 20-18665 MAM

Chapter 7

Lisa Heather Greenwood

Debtor.

__________________________/

EX-PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE 11 U.S.C. § 341 MEETING OF CREDITORS 

AND EXTEND THE TIME TO OBJECT TO DISCHARGE

The Debtor, Lisa Heather Greenwood, hereby files this Motion to Continue 11 U.S.C. § 341 

Meeting of Creditors and Extend the Time to Object to Discharge and in support thereof states:

1. The Debtor filed this proceeding as a voluntary Chapter 7 on August 11, 2020.

2. The 11 U.S.C. § 341 Meeting of Creditors is set for September 10, 2020 at 10 a.m. 

3. The Debtor’s Counsel has a hearing set for the same date and time and has requested a 

continued 11 U.S.C. § 341 Meeting of Creditors for another date and time.

4. The Trustee has agreed to continue the 11 U.S.C. § 341 Meeting of Creditors to 

September 29, 2020 at 11:30 am.

5. The Debtor has consented to an extension of time for the Chapter 7 Trustee and the 

United States Trustee’s Office to object to Debtor’s discharge for sixty (60) days after the 

meeting of creditors.

WHEREFORE the Debtor, Lisa Heather Greenwood, respectfully request that the Court enter an 

Order extending the time to object to the Debtor’s discharge sixty (60) days and to continue 11 

U.S.C. §341 Meeting of Creditors plus grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just 

and proper.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice 

in this Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Case 20-18665-MAM Doc 13 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 4
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the Ex-Parte Motion to Continue the Meeting of 

Creditors and Extend Time to Object to Discharge was served on: Office of the U.S. Trustee, 

U.S., Bankruptcy Court, 51 S.W. 1st Avenue, Room 1204, Miami, Florida 33130; Nicole Testa 

Mehdipour, Trustee, 200 East Broward Blvd, Ste 1110, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 and all

creditors listed on the attached list was sent via electronically and or by US mail in accordance 

with Bankruptcy Rule 7004 on this 10th day of September, 2020.

CHANDRA PARKER DOUCETTE, P.A.

Attorney for the Debtor

621 NW 53rd Street #240

Boca Raton, FL 33487

(561)995-1490 office

(754)999-0285 direct

By: /s/

Chandra Parker Doucette, Esq.

Bar #412716

chandra@chandralaw.net

service@chandralaw.net

Case 20-18665-MAM Doc 13 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 20-18665-MAM Doc 13 Filed 09/10/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 20-18665-MAM Doc 13 Filed 09/10/20 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 241 (Friday, December 13, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 65635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-21213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 96N--0425]


Paclitaxel Drug Products; Environmental Information Needed in New 
Drug Applications, Abbreviated New Drug Applications, and 
Investigational New Drug Applications

Correction

    In notice document 96-29486 beginning on page 58694 in the issue of 
Monday, November 18, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 58695, in the first column, in the third paragraph, in the 
last line, ``November 18, 1976'' should read ``November 18, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RYAN OSHUN MOORE,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

DON HELLING; NEVADA ATTORNEY

GENERAL,

 Respondents - Appellants.

No. 12-15795

DC No. 3:05 cv 0348 KJD

D. Nev., Reno

O R D E R

Before: FARRIS, TASHIMA, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

The petition for panel rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition

filed March 24, 2014, is withdrawn. An amended memorandum and/or opinion

will issue in due course. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

FILED

JUL 03 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
# L_2006160DE.01001901.xml

| 14.6.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 160/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 160/19

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2004/761/EG der Kommission vom 26. Oktober 2004 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Richtlinie 93/24/EWG des Rates betreffend die statistischen Erhebungen über den Rinderbestand und die Rindererzeugung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 337 vom 13. November 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 337 vom 13. November 2004

Seite 65, Artikel 7:

anstatt:

„Die Entscheidung 94/432/EG wird aufgehoben.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Entscheidung 94/433/EG wird aufgehoben.“

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20827]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 166 /Wednesday, August 27, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 45481]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. 28312; Amdt. No. 25-91]
RIN 2120-AF70


Revised Structural Loads Requirements for Transport Category 
Airplanes

Correction

    In rule document 97-19040 beginning on page 40702 in the issue of 
Tuesday, July 29, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 40702, in the third column, in the first full paragraph:
      a. In the eighth line, ``comment'' should be ``commenter''.
      b. In the 23rd line from the bottom, ``24'' should read ``25''.


Sec. 25.473  [Corrected]

    2. On page 40705, in the first column, in Sec. 25.473(d), in the 
fourth line, insert a period after ``Sec. 25.473(a)''.


Sec. 25.479  [Corrected]

    3. On page 40705, in the second column, in Sec. 25.479(d)(2)(i), in 
the fourth line, ``35%'' should read ``25%''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Technical implementation plan for the ShakeAlert production system: an Earthquake Early Warning system for the West Coast of the United States      

      May 12, 2014    

View Document

Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems can provide as much as tens of seconds of warning to people and automated systems before strong shaking arrives. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) and its partners are developing such an EEW system, called ShakeAlert, for the West Coast of the United States. This document describes the technical implementation of that system, which leverages existing stations and infrastructure of the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) regional networks to achieve this new capability. While significant progress has been made in developing the ShakeAlert early warning system, improved robustness of each component of the system and additional testing and certification are needed for the system to be reliable enough to issue public alerts. Major components of the system include dense networks of ground motion sensors, telecommunications from those sensors to central processing systems, algorithms for event detection and alert creation, and distribution systems to alert users. Capital investment costs for a West Coast EEW system are projected to be $38.3M, with additional annual maintenance and operations totaling $16.1M—in addition to current ANSS expenditures for earthquake monitoring. An EEW system is complementary to, but does not replace, other strategies to mitigate earthquake losses. The system has limitations: false and missed alerts are possible, and the area very near to an earthquake epicenter may receive little or no warning. However, such an EEW system would save lives, reduce injuries and damage, and improve community resilience by reducing longer-term economic losses for both public and private entities.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Elizabeth S Cochran

##### Res. Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

ecochran@usgs.gov

626-583-7238

## Related Content

#### Elizabeth S Cochran

##### Res. Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

ecochran@usgs.gov

626-583-7238

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - California;Oregon;Washington
                  - california
                  - Oregon
                  - Washington

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 522


Implantation or Injectable Dosage Form New Animal Drugs

CFR Correction

    In Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 500 to 599, 
revised as of April 1, 1997, on page 270, in the second column, in 
Sec. 522.2610(b)(2), ``017220'' should read ``011716''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 65308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ANM-13]


Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Hayden, CO

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-30354, beginning on page 61708, in the 
issue of Wednesday, November 19, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 61708, in the second column, the subject line is corrected 
to read as set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 5/14/15

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Allen Fawcett, EPA

SUBJECT: 5/13/15, FOE Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on 5/13/15 to discuss 

the definition of “emissions standard” and state flexibility in the proposed Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 

2014.

ATTENDEES

Allen Fawcett, OAR EPA

Kate DeAngelis, Friends of the Earth

Adele Morris, Brookings

Janet Peace, C2ES

Michael Obeiter, WRI

Catrina Rorke, R Street Institute

Sarah Hunt, Niskanen Center

Lori Sanders, R Street Institute

David Bookbinder, Element VI

Michael Wara, Stanford University
Exhibit
10.2


 


Third
AMENDMENT TO Promissory note


 


THIS
Third Amendment (THE
“THIRD AMENDMENT”) DATED July 20, 2017, shall amend the Promissory note
(THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF september 12, 2011 and AS amended on july
31, 2013 (the “first amendment”), AND ON JULY 27, 2015 (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE
MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”) AND FROST GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW.
THE NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND THE THIRD AMENDMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on September 12, 2011;


 


WHEREAS,
on July 27, 2015, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2015 until July 31, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties wish to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 to July 31, 2018.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Third Amendment and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1.
Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The
principal amount of the loan evidenced hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees
and expenses accrued, shall be due and payable on July 31, 2018 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2.
Governing Law. This Third Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict
of laws rules or principles.


 


3.
Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4.
Entire Agreement. This Third Amendment and the Amended Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to
the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 




    	 	 	 



    	 



    

 


5.
Interpretation. Any capitalized terms used in this Third Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided
in the Note.


 


6.
Counterparts. This Third Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile
by the Parties, in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective
when a counterpart hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this Third Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 20th day of July,
2017.


 


	 	NON-INVASIVE
    MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    James J. Martin
	 	Name:	James
    J. Martin
	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer


 


	Agreed
    and Accepted:	 
	 	 
	FROST
    GAMMA INVESTMENTS TRUST	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Phillip Frost	 
	Name:	Phillip
    Frost, M.D.	 
	Title:	Trustee	 


 




    	 	- 2-
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE PEREZ-GONZALEZ, a.k.a. Jose C.

Gonzalez, a.k.a. Jose Gonzalez-Perez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73728

Agency No. A095-819-589

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Perez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

MAR 18 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73728

de novo due process claims, Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.

2006), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the

evidence Perez-Gonzalez submitted with his motion to reopen was insufficient to

warrant reopening. See id. at 601 (if “the BIA determines that a motion to reopen

proceedings in which there has already been an unreviewable discretionary

determination concerning a statutory prerequisite to relief does not make out a

prima facie case for that relief,” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars this court from

revisiting the merits). 

To the extent Perez-Gonzalez contends that the BIA failed to consider some

or all of the evidence he submitted with the motion to reopen, he has not overcome

the presumption that the BIA did review the record. See id. at 603.

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Perez-Gonzalez’s remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
From: "Doug Stakem" < Doug.Stakem@ametek.com >

To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Jack Patterson" < jgp@criterion - industrial.com > Date: 05/06/2012 10:36 AM Subject: NOx Analyzer Inquiry



## Bill: Regarding your inquiry for range on our Model 920 Multigas gas analyzer, the ranges are: NO = 0 - 300 ppm NO2 = 0 - 300 ppm NOx = 0 - 300 ppm This is a hot, wet, UV an alyzer measurement. If you want to go to dry basis measurement, applying the Model 914 (also UV), ranges will be about 0 - 100 or 150 ppm for the above, depending on the process gas stream composition. Please contact us for more details. Regards, Doug Stakem Eastern Regional Sales Manager AMETEK Process Instruments 455 Corporate Blvd. Newark, DE 19702 302 -456 -4406 302 -456 -4444 (fax) 302 - 545 - 2195 (cell) doug.stakem@ametek.com

# Scope Contact **Data Integrity Check** 

**Date Created:** 05/02/2012 10:45:25 AM **Comments** Ametek NOx gas analyzer Model 920What is range in ppm of NOx for this analyzer? **Contact Information**

**Bill Neuffer US EPA**  **Source Type:** WE BSITE **Source Event:** Ametek Website 01/01/2006 - 01/01/2007|KMCY- 6SXJHH **Primary Address** US EPA D 243 - 02 RTP, NC United States 27711 **Alternate Address**

**Email Address:** neuffer.bill@epa.gov **Business Phone:** 919 - 541 - 2284 **Business Fax: Home Phone:**  **Home Fax: Other Phone:**  **Car Phone: Pager Number:**  **Tool -**  **Free Number: Web Site:**  **Contact Type: Language:**  English **Priority: Sales Rep(s):**  **Telemarketer:** Joy Carr/DE - NEW/Ametek **Other Contacts to update**  :
U.S. BANK N.A., as Trustee F/B/O HOLDERS OF STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II, INC., Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-3, Appellant, v. Sandra HENRY and Taharra Assets 5545, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D17-2324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Angel GOITIA, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

6412

Vol. 61, No. 34

Tuesday, February 20, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Administration

[Docket Nos. RP94-96-016 and RP94-213-

013 (Consolidated)]

CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice

of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas

Tariff

January 24, 1996.

Correction

In notice document 96–1698

appearing on page 3018 in the issue of

Tuesday, January 30, 1996, in the first

column, the date line after the subject

line is corrected as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5411–8]

Technical Correction; Final National

Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System Storm Water Multi-Sector

General Permit for Industrial Activities

Correction

In notice document 95–2722,

beginning on page 5248 in the issue of

Friday, February 9, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 5252, in the third column,

lines 1 through 22 at the top of the page

should be moved directly above the line

that reads ‘‘5. Monitoring and Reporting

Requirements’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 121

Small Business Size Standards

Correction

In rule document 96–1348 beginning

on page 3280 in the issue of Wednesday,

January 31, 1996 make the following

corrections:

§ 121.201 [Corrected]

(1) On page 3289, in § 121.201, in the

table ‘‘Size Standards by SIC Industry’’:

(a) In Division A, under the heading

‘‘Size standards in number of employees

or millions of Dollars’’, the entry

corresponding to ‘‘0252 Chicken Eggs’’

should read ‘‘1.5’’.

(b) In Division B the heading should

read ‘‘Division B--Mining’’.

(c) In Division B, under the heading

‘‘Size standards in number of employees

or millions of Dollars’’ the first three

entries should each read ‘‘500’’ not

‘‘$500’’.

(2) On page 3291, in the table, in

Division D, under the heading ‘‘SIC

code and description’’, the description

entry corresponding to the SIC code

number 3634 should read ‘‘Electric

Housewares and Fans’’.

(3) On page 3293, in the table, in

Division I, under the heading ‘‘SIC code

and description’’:

(a)The description entry

corresponding to the SIC code number

7218 should read ‘‘Industrial

Launderers’’.

(b)The description entry

corresponding to the SIC code number

7381 should read ‘‘Detective, Guard,

and Armored Car Services’’.

(4) On page 3294, in the Footnotes, in

entry 13, in the first line the word

‘code’’ was misspelled.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D