alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
12.3  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002   I, Dr.
Philip Nolan, as Chief Executive Officer of eircom Group
plc (registrant), and eircom Funding,
Valentia Telecommunications and eircom Limited
(additional registrants) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)  
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31
March 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and  (2)  
the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant and the additional registrants.   By:Dr. Philip NolanChief ExecutiveDate:
  23/7/04
  
  
  eircom Group plc   A
signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to eircom Group plc and will be
retained by eircom Group plc and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Species management research program [postcard]      

      September 12, 2023    

View Report

Executive Summary

Our nation’s fish and wildlife species face increasingly complex threats and challenges. Ensuring a healthy future for these species benefits all Americans, contributing to the abundance of our food supply, the well-being of diverse cultures and communities, and the future of biodiverse ecosystems. The U.S. Geological Survey Species Management Research Program (SMRP) plays a critical role in achieving that future by delivering targeted research and foundational scientific services needed to conserve fish and wildlife in a changing world.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mona Khalil, Ph.D.

##### Energy & Wildlife Program Specialist

Ecosystems Mission Area

mkhalil@usgs.gov

#### Sally House

##### Public Affairs Specialist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

shouse@usgs.gov

#### Mark Wimer

##### Wildlife Program Manager

Ecosystems Mission Area

mwimer@usgs.gov

703-648-4054

#### Dave Hu

##### Fisheries Program Manager

Ecosystems Mission Area

dhu@usgs.gov

703-648-4098

#### Michael J Adams

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

mjadams@usgs.gov

541-750-0980

## Related Content

#### Mona Khalil, Ph.D.

##### Energy & Wildlife Program Specialist

Ecosystems Mission Area

mkhalil@usgs.gov

#### Sally House

##### Public Affairs Specialist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

shouse@usgs.gov

#### Mark Wimer

##### Wildlife Program Manager

Ecosystems Mission Area

mwimer@usgs.gov

703-648-4054

#### Dave Hu

##### Fisheries Program Manager

Ecosystems Mission Area

dhu@usgs.gov

703-648-4098

#### Michael J Adams

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

mjadams@usgs.gov

541-750-0980

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Energy and Wildlife
                  - Fish and Aquatic Species
                  - Threats
                  - Tools and Technology
                  - Wildlife and Terrestrial Species
                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - energy and wildlife
                  - Fish and Aquatic
                  - Fish and Aquatic Ecology
                  - animal migration
                  - bird migration
                  - pollinators

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

25017

Vol. 62, No. 88

Wednesday, May 7, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

7 CFR Part 1755

RUS Standard for Acceptance Tests

and Measurements of

Telecommunications Plant

Correction

In rule document 97–11316,

beginning on page 23958, in the issue of

Friday, May 2, 1997, make the following

correction:

On page 23992, Figure 16 (End-to-End

Fiber Optic Attenuation Measurement

Showing Measurement in One Direction

Only) should be removed, and the

following equation inserted:

Actual Splice Loss (dB) =

OTDR Reading OTDR Reading

From A to B + From B to A

2

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Job Training Partnership Act and Work

Opportunity Tax Credit; Lower Living

Standard Income Level

Correction

In notice document 97–10699,

beginning on page 20205 in the issue of

Friday, April 25, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 20205, in the third

column, in the seventh line, ‘‘Inder’’

should read ‘‘Under’’.

2. On page 20206, in the first column,

in the third paragraph, in the fourth

line, ‘‘CLI-U’’ should read ‘‘CPI-U’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISION

[Docket 70-7001]

Notice of Amendment to Certificate of

Compliance GDP-1 for U.S. Enrichment

Corporation, Paducah Gaseous

Diffusion Plant, Paducah, KY

Correction

In notice document 97–10326

beginning on page 19631 in the issue of

Tuesday, April 22, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 19632, in the second column,

in the Effective date section, ‘‘June 23,

1997’’ should read ‘‘60 days after

issuance of amendment.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Form CGFCRD3Z (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−22497−EPK

Chapter: 7

In re:

Stuart Roy Miller

3421 NW 25th Terrace

Boca Raton, FL 33434

SSN: xxx−xx−0878

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Erik P. Kimball to consider the

following:

Motion to Compromise Controversy with Office Depot, LLC and Stuart Roy Miller Filed by Creditor

Office Depot (153)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: July 14, 2021

Time: 09:30 AM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although

conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom

must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct

themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day

before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsduGsrTouGn7Udkhqe_ZF90qPJ3uM95E

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 6/10/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Dawn Leonard

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-22497-EPK Doc 155 Filed 06/10/21 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Moon meteoritic seismic hum: Steady state prediction      

      January 1, 2009    

We use three different statistical models describing the frequency of meteoroid impacts on Earth to estimate the seismic background noise due to impacts on the lunar surface. Because of diffraction, seismic events on the Moon are typically characterized by long codas, lasting 1 h or more. We find that the small but frequent impacts generate seismic signals whose codas overlap in time, resulting in a permanent seismic noise that we term the "lunar hum" by analogy with the Earth's continuous seismic background seismic hum. We find that the Apollo era impact detection rates and amplitudes are well explained by a model that parameterizes (1) the net seismic impulse due to the impactor and resulting ejecta and (2) the effects of diffraction and attenuation. The formulation permits the calculation of a composite waveform at any point on the Moon due to simulated impacts at any epicentral distance. The root-mean-square amplitude of this waveform yields a background noise level that is about 100 times lower than the resolution of the Apollo long-period seismometers. At 2 s periods, this noise level is more than 1000 times lower than the low noise model prediction for Earth's microseismic noise. Sufficiently sensitive seismometers will allow the future detection of several impacts per day at body wave frequencies. Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.

## Citation Information
Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 150-6    Filed 03/09/21    Page 1 of 3

Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 150-6    Filed 03/09/21    Page 2 of 3

Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 150-6    Filed 03/09/21    Page 3 of 3
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management LLC,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		August 12, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.15

EMG
EASY MONEY GROUP
5295 Greenwich Road, Suite 108
Virginia Beach, VA 23462


February 20, 2002


Mr. Paul Bunnell
Edens-Tower Plaza
790 Frontage Road
Northfield, IL  60093

Re:    AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL LOAN AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 1, 2000 BETWEEN
       DEVILLE INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND EASY MONEY HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Dear Mr. Bunnell:

The following letter is meant to amend the original loan agreement dated August
1, 2000 between Deville Investment Corporation and Easy Money Holdings
Corporation. The parties agree to the following amendment.

Easy Money Holdings Corporation will satisfy the $50,000 note payable to Deville
Corporation by making full payment on the note under the following terms. It is
the intent of the parties to make three installments: first installment amount
of $10,000 and which includes accrued interest due upon signing document no
later than February 5, 2002. Second installment due February 22, 2002 in the
amount of $23,000. Third installment due March 15, 2002 shall include the
remaining balance of the note including any accrued interest. In the event that
these payments are not made in a timely fashion (within 5 days of their due
dates), Deville, upon notification to the Easy Money Holdings Corporation
(certified mailing only) and the failure of the Easy Money Holdings Corporation
to cure the deficiency within 6 business days of notification, will have the
right to accelerate the entire loan balance and make demand of the full note
immediately. IN consideration of the above mentioned payment terms, Deville
Investment Corporation has agreed to surrender 50% of all rights to current and
future warrants, options or equity interest in Easy Money Holdings Corporation
or affiliates. Specifically, Deville Investment Corporation has agreed to
surrender their 50% right in certain warrants referred to in the original loan
agreement dated August 1, 2000. If the Easy Money Holdings Corporation fails to
satisfy this obligation under these terms, the warrants will not expire until
the obligation is paid in full.

This will be the entire amendment to the original loan agreement dated August 1,
2000.

As authorized agents or representatives of the respectful parties, the following
individual agrees to the above referenced terms.


/s/ David Greenberg                           /s/ Paul Bunnell
--------------------------------------        ----------------------------------
David Greenberg, President       Dated        Paul Bunnell, Agent          Dated
Easy Money Holdings Corporation               Deville Investment Corp.
EXHIBIT "C"

Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 7
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 7
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 3 of 7
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 4 of 7
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 5 of 7
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 6 of 7
Case 20-23359-LMI Doc 234-3 Filed 04/01/21 Page 7 of 7
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00558

- CV

BRUINGTON ENGINEERING, LTD.

,

Appellant

v.

PEDERNAL ENERGY, LLC

,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. 7,767

Honorable Jose A

. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On September 19 , 2014

, Appellee Pedernal Energy, LLC filed a motion for rehearing and

a motion for en banc reconsideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1, 49.7. The c ourt requests

Appellant Bruington Engineering file a response to the motion

. See id. R. 49.2. If Appellant

Bruington Engineering chooses to file a response

, any such response must be filed not later than

November 7, 2014

.

It is so ORDERED on October 8, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________ ________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7177

WILLIE A. RICHARDS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN WILLIAM R. DAVIS; MAJOR EDWARD PORCHER;

SERGEANT C. ROGERS and OFFICER CONYERS each

individually and as employees of South Carolina Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-96-2897-0-23BD)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Richards, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James III, RICHARDSON & JAMES, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Richards v. Davis, No. CA96-2897-0-23BD (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Mw 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake of August 2011 and aftershock sequence: constraints on earthquake source parameters and fault geometry      

      December 1, 2013    

The Mw 5.8 earthquake of 23 August 2011 (17:51:04 UTC) (moment, M0 5.7×1017  N·m) occurred near Mineral, Virginia, within the central Virginia seismic zone and was felt by more people than any other earthquake in United States history. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) received 148,638 felt reports from 31 states and 4 Canadian provinces. The USGS PAGER system estimates as many as 120,000 people were exposed to shaking intensity levels of IV and greater, with approximately 10,000 exposed to shaking as high as intensity VIII. Both regional and teleseismic moment tensor solutions characterize the earthquake as a northeast‐striking reverse fault that nucleated at a depth of approximately 7±2  km. The distribution of reported macroseismic intensities is roughly ten times the area of a similarly sized earthquake in the western United States (Horton and Williams, 2012). Near‐source and far‐field damage reports, which extend as far away as Washington, D.C., (135 km away) and Baltimore, Maryland, (200 km away) are consistent with an earthquake of this size and depth in the eastern United States (EUS).

Within the first few days following the earthquake, several government and academic institutions installed 36 portable seismograph stations in the epicentral region, making this among the best‐recorded aftershock sequences in the EUS. Based on modeling of these data, we provide a detailed description of the source parameters of the mainshock and analysis of the subsequent aftershock sequence for defining the fault geometry, area of rupture, and observations of the aftershock sequence magnitude–frequency and temporal distribution. The observed slope of the magnitude–frequency curve or b‐value for the aftershock sequence is consistent with previous EUS studies (b=0.75), suggesting that most of the accumulated strain was released by the mainshock. The aftershocks define a rupture that extends between approximately 2–8 km in depth and 8–10 km along the strike of the fault plane. Best‐fit modeling of the geometry of the aftershock sequence defines a rupture plane that strikes N36°E and dips to the east‐southeast at 49.5°. Moment tensor solutions of the mainshock and larger aftershocks are consistent with the distribution of aftershock locations, both indicating reverse slip along a northeast–southwest striking southeast‐dipping fault plane.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Canada;United States
                  - Virginia

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10923]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 49726]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 440

[MB-071-F]
RIN 0938-AH00


Medicaid Program; Coverage of Personal Care Services

Correction

    In rule document 97-24266 beginning on page 47896, in the issue of 
Thursday, September 11, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 47896, in the first column, in the EFFECTIVE DATE section, 
``November 10, 1977'' should read ``November 10, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Joe REID v. STATE

CR-15-0580

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
H. R. 5028 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10721 

E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Mary E. McCoy Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MARY E. MCCOY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 10721 E Jefferson Ave in Detroit, Michigan, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mary E. McCoy Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Mary E. McCoy Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.