alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Liane Pelletier, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as
         amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 2, 2005           /s/ Liane Pelletier
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Liane Pelletier
                                  Chief Executive Officer,
                                  Chairman of the Board and President
                                  Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
# L_2005030EN.01002701.xml

| 3.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 30/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 30/27

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2005/78/EC, Euratom of 1 February 2005 amending Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 29 of 2 February 2005
  )

The publication of Decision 2005/78/EC, Euratom should be considered null and void.

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 185 (Monday, September 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20925]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 105 / Monday, September 25, 1995 / 
Corrections
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 49442]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 50-95]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone--Kodiak, Alaska, Application and 
Public Hearing

Correction

    In notice document 95-22763 appearing on page 47547, in the issue 
of Wednesday, September 13, 1995, make the following correction:
    On the same page, in the second column, in the third paragraph, in 
the 11th line, ``November 22'' should read ``November 27''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Vista International Technologies, Inc. - 10-Q/A




Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vista International Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: June 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Bradley A. RippsBradley A. RippsInterim Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer and principal

financial and accounting officer)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Arnold Hantman, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-K of SFBC International, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 15, 2004

/s/ ARNOLDHANTMAN

Chief Executive Officer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

41624

Vol. 63, No. 149

Tuesday, August 4, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

RIN 1018-AF03

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

and Plants; Proposal to List the

Contiguous United States Distinct

Population Segment of the Canada

Lynx as a Threatened Species; and the

Captive Population of Canada Lynx

Within the Coterminous United States

(lower 48 States) as Threatened Due to

Similarity of Appearance, With a

Special Rule

Correction

In proposed rule document 98–17771,

beginning on page 36994, in the issue of

Wednesday, July 8, 1998,make the

following correction:

§ 17.11 [Corrected]

On page 37012, § 17.11 (h), the table

is corrected to read as follows:

Species

Historic range

Vertebrate population

where endangered or

threatened

Status When listed Critical

habitat

Special

rules Common name Scientific name

MAMMALS

* * * * * * *

Lynx, Canada .... Lynx

canadensis.

USA (WA, OR, ID, MT,

UT, WY, CO, MN, WI,

MI, ME, VT, NH, NY,

MA, PA, AK), Canada.

WA, OR, ID, MT, UT,

WY, CO, MN, WI, MI,

ME, VT, NH, NY, MA,

PA, (unless bred in

captivity).

T N/A N/A

Do ..................... ......do ............... ......do ............................. All captive animals within the coterminous

U.S.A. (lower 48

States), activities as

prohibited or allowed

under 17.31, 17.32,

17.40(k), 17.52, and

part 23.

T(S/A) N/A 17.40(k)

* * * * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Using spatiotemporal models and distance sampling to map the space use and abundance of newly metamorphosed Western Toads (Anaxyrus boreas)      

      January 1, 2011    

High variability in abundance, cryptic coloration, and small body size of newly metamorphosed anurans have limited demographic studies of this life-history stage. We used line-transect distance sampling and Bayesian methods to estimate the abundance and spatial distribution of newly metamorphosed Western Toads (Anaxyrus boreas) in terrestrial habitat surrounding a montane lake in central Washington, USA. We completed 154 line-transect surveys from the commencement of metamorphosis (15 September 2009) to the date of first snow accumulation in fall (1 October 2009), and located 543 newly metamorphosed toads. After accounting for variable detection probability associated with the extent of barren habitats, estimates of total surface abundance ranged from a posterior median of 3,880 (95% credible intervals from 2,235 to 12,600) in the first week of sampling to 12,150 (5,543 to 51,670) during the second week of sampling. Numbers of newly metamorphosed toads dropped quickly with increasing distance from the lakeshore in a pattern that differed over the three weeks of the study and contradicted our original hypotheses. Though we hypothesized that the spatial distribution of toads would initially be concentrated near the lake shore and then spread outward from the lake over time, we observed the opposite. Ninety-five percent of individuals occurred within 20, 16, and 15 m of shore during weeks one, two, and three respectively, probably reflecting continued emergence of newly metamorphosed toads from the lake and mortality or burrow use of dispersed individuals. Numbers of toads were highest near the inlet stream of the lake. Distance sampling may provide a useful method for estimating the surface abundance of newly metamorphosed toads and relating their space use to landscape variables despite uncertain and variable probability of detection. We discuss means of improving the precision of estimates of total abundance.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael J Adams

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

mjadams@usgs.gov

541-750-0980

## Related Content

#### Michael J Adams

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

mjadams@usgs.gov

541-750-0980

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Mt. Rainier National Park
                  - Washington

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Similarities, differences, and some genetic problems of the Wyoming and Colorado plateau types of uranium deposits in sandstone      

      November 1, 1970    

Uranium deposits of the Wyoming roll type and the Colorado Plateau peneconcordant type are the principal domestic resources of uranium. Both types occur in lenticular sandstone beds of continental origin, have a similar suite of elements and minerals, are associated with mildly altered rock, and are thought to have formed by reduction precipitation from ground waters before significant regional deformation. They differ in several respects. The Wyoming deposits are in unlithified sandstone that is highly arkosic, whereas the Colorado Plateau deposits are in lithified sandstone that is only slightly to moderately arkosic. Uranium is the only ore metal in the Wyoming deposits, whereas vanadium or copper is more abundant than uranium in some of the Plateau deposits. The Wyoming deposits are elongate crescent-shaped bodies that extend vertically through, or partly through, a sandstone unit and which are scattered, like widely spaced beads on a string, along miles-long interfaces between oxidized (altered) and unoxidized sandstone, whereas the Plateau deposits are thin tabular layers that are nearly concordant to bedding and which occur as discrete bodies, like raisins in raisin bread, enveloped in rock altered by reduction. The Wyoming ore rolls and interfaces were dynamic, having been pushed downdip by downward-moving oxygen-bearing water that passed through the interfaces and deposited the ore minerals on the reducing side, whereas the Plateau deposits seemingly formed as static bodies, localized by intensive reducing "patches" in a mildly reducing environment. These differences focus attention on genetic problems relating to the Eh of the ore-bearing and altering solutions, the shape and localization of deposits, and the source of the uranium.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado Plateau
                  - Arizona
                  -  Colorado
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  South Dakota
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
Case 20-12403-SMG Doc 2 Filed 02/24/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-12403-SMG Doc 2 Filed 02/24/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 20-19838-LMI Doc 9 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-19838-LMI Doc 9 Filed 09/11/20 Page 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

PR/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BUSHRA NADHEM NAMOO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-76426

Agency No. A096-073-065

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Bushra Nadhem Namoo, a native and citizen of Iraq, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of

FILED

MAR 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
PR/Research 2 05-76426

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, Krotova v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 1080, 1084 (9th Cir. 2005), and we grant

the petition for review, and remand.

The IJ found that the physical violence and harassment committed by Iraqi

government agents against Namoo, a Chaldean Christian, did not rise to the level

of persecution, and was not on account of a protected ground. These findings are

not supported by substantial evidence. See id. at 1085-87; see also Mashiri v.

Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 1112, 1120 (9th Cir. 2004) (noting that violence against family

members may support an applicant’s asylum claim).

Accordingly, because a showing of past persecution entitles a petitioner to a

presumption of both a well-founded fear and clear probability of future

persecution, see 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(1) & 1208.16(b)(1)(i), and because the

agency did not analyze Namoo’s claim of future fear under this presumption, we

grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings consistent with

this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam). 

Upon remand, the agency may wish to consider whether Namoo’s fear of future

persecution is objectively reasonable in light of the current situation in Iraq. See

Hanna v. Keisler, 506 F.3d 933, 939 (9th Cir. 2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of CEO
      and CFOPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant
      toSection 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K ofLegacy Wine & Spirits International
Ltd.for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jaclyn Cruz, as the
equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1)   The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/Jaclyn CruzName: Jaclyn CruzDate: April 12,
2010  This
certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Case 19-22972-MAM Doc 13 Filed 10/03/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-22972-MAM Doc 13 Filed 10/03/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-22972-MAM Doc 13 Filed 10/03/19 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Sediment-yield history of a small basin in southern Utah, 1937–1976: Implications for land management and geomorphology      

      May 12, 1987    

Alluvium deposited in a reservoir from 1937 to 1976 records the sediment-yield history of a small (2.8 km2), high-relief basin in semiarid southern Utah. Stratification in the alluvium shows that sediment was deposited in the reservoir only 21 times in 38 yr, a runoff recurrence interval of 1.8 yr. Thus, on average, the particular combination of rainfall intensity, duration, and antecedent moisture conditions producing runoff did not recur often. On the basis of the volume of beds in the reservoir fill, sediment yield of individual runoff events averaged 2500 m3/km2 (5.3 a-ft/mi2) with slightly less than one order of magnitude variation. This low variation is not expected of small basins and probably resulted from limited hillslope sediment supply, suggesting that transport processes were more rapid than weathering processes. Sediment yield, therefore, was evidently controlled by the availability of freshly weathered material.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - southern utah
                  - Arizona
                  -  Utah

View All **
1

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:21 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Subject: Draft PRA Language  

Megan,

This is some preliminary language that I developed that you can edit as appropriate for potential use in the FRN.

Draft language for PRA section:

The information collection requirements in the final action (i.e., SIP call) were submitted for emergency approval to

OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and should be completed before the effective date of

this final action. The emergency processing information collection request (ICR) can be found at XX FR XXXX

(XXXXX).  The information collection requirements are not enforceable until OMB approves them and assigns an OMB

control number.   

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for the EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed

in 40 CFR part 9.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202‐395‐3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
|   | (a) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May      22, 2009 | By:     /s/ Scott      Hughes                                               |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Scott      Hughes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                         | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |