alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-10367-BKC-AJC

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

ANTHONY D. BEASLEY

SHELIA S. BEASLEY

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE the above-referenced Debtors are delinquent in Confirmed Chapter 13 Plan 

Payments in the amount of $9579.56.

The Debtors shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of this Notice to make all payments due under 

the Confirmed Plan/Modified Plan, INCLUDING ANY PAYMENTS THAT BECOME DUE WITHIN 

THE FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY PERIOD, in the form of a money order or cashier's check only. Payments 

must be sent to:

DEBTORS

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 2099

MEMPHIS, TN 38101-2099

If the Chapter 13 Trustee ("Trustee") does not receive all payments by January 7, 2022 to bring the 

Debtors totally current under the Confirmed Plan/Modified Plan, or if applicable, a Motion to Modify has 

not been timely filed and set within fifteen (15) days of this Notice pursuant to the Confirmation Order, the 

Trustee may file and serve a Report of Non-Compliance.

As a result of the Debtors failure to become current or timely file a Motion to Modify, the case shall be 

dismissed without further notice or hearing.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Delinquency was served, via U.S. 

first class mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed on the attached service list this 23rd day of 

November 2021.

/s/ Nancy K. Neidich

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

_____________________________________

Case 20-10367-AJC Doc 67 Filed 11/23/21 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY

CASE NO.: 20-10367-BKC-AJC

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTORS

ANTHONY D. BEASLEY

SHELIA S. BEASLEY

1391 NW 170TH TER

MIAMI GARDENS, FL 33169-5211

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTORS

JOSE PAGAN, ESQUIRE

1 NE 2ND AVE

SUITE 200

MIAMI, FL 33132-2532

Case 20-10367-AJC Doc 67 Filed 11/23/21 Page 2 of 2
Debra MCCLELLAND, Appellant, v. HIGHLAND COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Ascension Insurance, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| (1)   | The      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                                   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |                                                                   |   |
| Dated:      October 29, 2010  |   | /s/ Zhihong      Jia                                              |   |
|                               |   | Zhihong      Jia                                                       |   |
|                               |   | Chairman,      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer |   |
|                               |   |                                                                   |   |

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Pocatello Valley, Idaho, earthquake      

      January 1, 1975    

A Richter magnitude 6.3 earthquake occurred at 8:31 p.m mountain daylight time on March 27, 1975, near the Utah-Idaho border in Pocatello Valley. The epicenter of the main shock was located at 42.094° N, 112.478° W, and had a focal depth of 5.5 km. This earthquake was the largest in the continental United States since the destructive San Fernando earthquake of February 1971. The main shock was preceded by a magnitude 4.5 foreshock on March 26. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pocatello Valley
                  - Idaho; Utah
                  - Idaho
                  -  Utah

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           U. S. Geological Survey programs in Michigan      

      January 1, 1996    

For more than 100 years, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has provided earth-science information on which managers, scientists, and other interested citizens base decisions regarding Michigan’s natural resources and natural hazards. The non-regulatory and scientific nature of the USGS work ensures that our products are technically sound, unbiased, and equally accessible and available to all interested parties. The various programs of the USGS in Michigan reflect a response to the citizens of Michigan and their need for geologic, topographic, biologic, and hydrologic information. Much of the work of the USGS in Michigan is part of cooperative programs in which the diversity of interests among local, regional, State, Tribal, and Federal agencies is accommodated through joint planning and funding.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Michigan

View All **
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 17, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS M. MATA, SR., 

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JACKSON COUNTY THIRD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-6050

(D.C. No. 5:15-CV-00134-W)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before GORSUCH, McKAY, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

After Carlos Mata pleaded no contest to assault with intent to commit a

felony, an Oklahoma state court sentenced him to two years in prison. Five years

later, after he finished his prison term, Mr. Mata filed a petition for a writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction. A magistrate

judge recommended dismissing the petition, noting that while the federal habeas

*

 After examining Mr. Mata’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and

judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive

value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
statute affords it jurisdiction over persons in custody, an individual doesn’t

remain “in custody” when his sentence has fully expired. Maleng v. Cook, 490

U.S. 488, 490-91 (1989). Alternatively, the magistrate noted that Mr. Mata faced

another problem: he failed to exhaust his state law remedies before bringing his

federal habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1); O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S.

838, 842 (1999). Indeed, it appears Mr. Mata never pursued any direct appeal in

state court and he doesn’t assert that he’s attempted to avail himself of state postconviction procedures. See Okla. Stat. tit. 22, §§ 1080-1089. The district court

adopted the magistrate’s recommendation in full and dismissed the petition. 

 Seeking to appeal the district court’s disposition, Mr. Mata applies to this

court for a certificate of appealability. But where, as here, the district court has

dismissed a habeas petition on procedural grounds, we may issue a COA only if

“jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). And that

much we do not see. Rather than addressing how the district court erred in its

dispositive rulings, Mr. Mata’s submissions to us focus primarily on the relief he

seeks and the merits of his argument for that relief. In those submissions we are

unable to discern for ourselves a reasoned basis on which we might debate the

district court’s procedural rulings. 

- 2 -
The application for a COA is denied and the appeal dismissed.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch

Circuit Judge

- 3 -
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11001]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 571


Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

CFR Correction

    In Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 400 to 999, 
revised as of October 1, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 482, in Sec. 571.208, in the first column, paragraph 
S4.5.3.5 should be added immediately following paragraph S4.5.3.4 to 
read as follows:
    S4.5.3.5 A replacement automatic belt shall be meet the 
requirements of S4.1(k) of Standard No. 209.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 110 (Monday, June 9, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 31473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4212-N-01]


Safe Neighborhood Grants; Notice of Funding Availability--Fiscal 
Year 1997

Correction

    In notice document 97-13517, beginning on page 28586 in the issue 
of Friday, May 23, 1997, make the following correction:
    On Page 28593, in the second column, in the eighth line from the 
bottom, ``July 21, 1997'' should read ``August 21, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Sl()-l()()9()l-()7^ ) 

## APARTMEN TO f ;U,NSF0RW10 H •• : Kh TOPERATION S mOC T ! 2 A S : I 2 'O FCOMMERC E 

# R Augus t 26,201 0 Secretar yRa yLaHoo d Unite d ^te s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Washington , O C 2059 0 Re : Suppor t o f th e Sout h Ben d Regiona l Airpor t Applicatio n fo rFundin g Unde rth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Dea rSecretar yLaHood , O n behal fo fth e Warsaw/Kosdusk o Count yChamt}e ro f Commerce , I a m delighte d t o suppor t th e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Gran t applicatio n submitte d b yth e St . Josep h Count y Airpor t Authorit yfo rmarketin g fundin g to encoure^ e a ne wcarrie rt o ente rth e Sout h Ben d marke t wit h non'Sto p servic e to Denver , CO . Ai rservk; e devetopmen t i s importan t forth e economk : healt h o f ou rregk)n . Businesse s an d resdent s mus t hav e acces s to th e gtoba l transportatto n syste m a t affordabl e fares . Sout h Ben d Regiona l Airport' s importanc e to th e Mk^ian a regk m an d Kosciusk o Count ycanno t b e overstated . Ourqualit yo f lif e i ? linke d to th e airport' s growt h no wan d i n th e future . Thi s appik»tio n i s a n excellen t opportunit ytorSt . Josep h County , Kosciusk o County , an d Mrchian a to leverag e scarc e resource s to hel p deveto p ai rservto e a t Sout h Ben d Airpor t b ysupportin g thi s appficatto n unde rth e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Devetopmen t Gran t program . Th e potentia l benefi t to Kosciust o Count yi s great . W e urg e yo u to fiiii yfun d th e reques t fro m th e Sout h Ben d Regtona l Airport . Sincerely , Trin a Ho y Directo ro f Communteatton s & Event s Warsaw/Kosdusk o Count yChambe ro f Commerc e 

## M 5 Soutl i BnfUl o Sireet , Suit e A . Warsaw , Indian a4558 0 5T4.267.651 1 . 800.776.631 1 . FA X 574.267.776* 2
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 46 Filed 07/20/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 46 Filed 07/20/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 46 Filed 07/20/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 46 Filed 07/20/20 Page 4 of 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The USGS geomagnetism program and its role in space weather monitoring      

      January 1, 2011    

Magnetic storms result from the dynamic interaction of the solar wind with the coupled magnetospheric-ionospheric system. Large storms represent a potential hazard for the activities and infrastructure of a modern, technologically based society [Baker et al., 2008]; they can cause the loss of radio communications, reduce the accuracy of global positioning systems, damage satellite electronics and affect satellite operations, increase pipeline corrosion, and induce voltage surges in electric power grids, causing blackouts. So while space weather starts with the Sun and is driven by the solar wind, it is on, or just above, the surface of the Earth that the practical effects of space weather are realized. Therefore, ground-based sensor networks, including magnetic observatories [Love, 2008], play an important role in space weather monitoring.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
**Exhibit 4.8**

***Convenience Translation from theGerman Original***

KIM SCHINDELHAUERChairman of the Supervisory board ofAIXTRON AG

DrBernd SchulteThe Board, AIXTRON AGKackertstr. 15-17

D-52072Aachen

Date October 20, 2004

**Board service contracts**

Dear Dr Schulte

On behalf of the full Supervisory Board, I am pleased to be able toinform you that we are extending your board service contract to March 31,2010. Accompanying the extension of the contract, we will increase yourbenefits from April 1, 2005 to €20,000.00 per month, i.e. € 260,000.00p.a.

In addition, you willreceive from a “total bonus pot” a profit sharing bonus in the amount of 1.5%of the modified consolidated profit for the year (in accordance with IFRS –consolidated accounts) with retroactive effect to January 1, 2005. Themodified consolidated profit for the year results from the consolidatedaccounts of the company, according to the consolidated accounts (IFRS) auditedby and issued with the opinion of the auditor, less any consolidated lossbrought forward from previous years and any amounts that are to be transferredfrom the profit for the year of AIXTRON AG to the retained earnings inaccordance with the law or the articles of association.

The consolidated loss carried forward results from the annualconsolidated losses from previous years, less annual consolidated profits fromsubsequent financial years. Possible losses carried forward from financialyears before January 1, 2005 are not taken into consideration.

The total bonus pot amounts to 10% of the modified consolidated profitfor the year and amounts in sum to a maximum of €6.5 million.

Furthermore, we will increase the amount that covers the pension schemeunder s. 4.3.1 in your service contract of March 7, 2002 to €40,000.00p.a.

The supervisory board will examine other benefits after three years tocheck that they are appropriate.

All other regulations in your service contract remain unchanged.

I wish you every success.

[signed]

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0621

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRITTNEY ANN ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2022

02/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0621
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CLOVERPLACE CONDO ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1560

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,966,072
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           651,547
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2,350,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               2,790,500
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    5,906,451
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        78,346,460
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          77,244,044
<LOANS>                                      135,657,001
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,135,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               236,550,290
<DEPOSITS>                                   169,007,650
<SHORT-TERM>                                  42,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,759,752
<LONG-TERM>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             21,081
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    23,761,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               236,550,290
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9,187,993
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,548,355
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 654,679
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              14,391,027
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             7,471,264
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,316,742
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6,074,285
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    113,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (97,894)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4,599,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,923,676
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,923,676
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,185,245
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      2.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      676,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  460,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,022,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          0
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,135,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,135,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1



                   ALASKA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

                       STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                 FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999
                            (UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     2000           1999
                                                                   --------       --------
<S>                                                                <C>            <C>
Earnings:
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:

  Income from continuing operations                                $(25,653)      $(20,701)
  Add:
    Equity in loss of minority investments                              303            198
    Income taxes                                                       (197)          (301)
    Fixed charges                                                    62,530         37,624
                                                                   --------       --------

    Earnings                                                       $ 36,983       $ 16,820
                                                                   ========       ========

Fixed Charges:
    Interest and debt expense per statements of income
     (including allocation of funds used during construction)      $ 62,109       $ 37,517
    Estimate of interest within rental expense                          421            107
                                                                   --------       --------

    Fixed charges                                                  $ 62,530       $ 37,624
                                                                   ========       ========

Ratio of Earnings to fixed charges                                     0.59           0.45
                                                                   ========       ========
</TABLE>

        The amount of the deficiency for years 2000 and 1999 is $25,547 and
$20,804, respectively. The deficiency represents the amount needed to achieve a
ratio of 1:1. The Company did not have registered debt or any operations prior
to 1999.



                                       53
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 117 Filed 10/08/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 117 Filed 10/08/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 117 Filed 10/08/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 117 Filed 10/08/22 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 4th day of January, 2006.


                             By: /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive Officer,
                                     President and Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon
request.