alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1551

CALVIN RUFFIN MALLORY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HELEN FAHEY, Chairman of Virginia Parole Board, etc.; WALTER 

RILEY, etc.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:10-cv-00283-REP)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Ruffin Mallory, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Ruffin Mallory seeks to appeal the district 

court’s dismissal of his complaint without prejudice because he

failed to comply with the district court’s October 4, 2002, 

order enjoining him from filing pleadings that do not comport 

with certain requirements, such as legibility and submission on 

the proper forms. 

Generally, a district court’s dismissal of a complaint 

without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. 

Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 

1993) (holding that “a plaintiff may not appeal the dismissal of 

his complaint without prejudice unless the grounds for dismissal 

clearly indicate that no amendment [in the complaint] could cure 

the defects in the plaintiff’s case”) (alteration in original) 

(internal quotation marks omitted). However, “if the grounds of 

the dismissal make clear that no amendment could cure the 

defects in the plaintiff's case, the order dismissing the 

complaint is final in fact and [appellate jurisdiction exists].” 

Id. at 1066 (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

In this case, Mallory may be able to save his action 

by amending his complaint to comply with the district court’s 

2002 order. Therefore, the district court’s dismissal of 

Mallory’s complaint without prejudice is not an appealable final 
3

order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Donna CIESLAK, Appellant, v. OCEAN VICTORY, LLC, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

43191

Vol. 60, No. 160

Friday, August 18, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Parts 204 and 215

Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement; Sequence of

Progress Payments and Contract

Modifications

Correction

In rule document 95–16162 beginning

on page 34467 in the issue of Monday,

July 3, 1995, make the following

corrections:

204.7103-1 [Corrected]

1. On page 34468, in the third

column, in section 204.7103-

1(a)(4)(ii)(B), in the second line, ‘‘or’’

should read ‘‘of’’.

204.7107 [Corrected]

2. On page 34469, in the second

column, in section 204.7107(e)(1), in the

second line, ‘‘identify’’ should read

‘‘identity’’.

3. On the same page, in the third

column, in section 204.7101(e)(3), in the

second line from the bottom, insert

‘‘additional’’ after ‘‘the’’.

215.406-2 [Corrected]

4. On page 34470, in the first column,

in the heading for section 215.406-2,

‘‘schedule’’ should read ‘‘Schedule’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP94–343–000]

NorAm Gas Transmission Company;

Notice Rescheduling Informal

Settlement Conference

Correction

In notice document 95–19725

appearing on page 40835 in the issue of

Thursday, August 10, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 40835, in the third column,

in the first line, the Docket Number is

corrected to read as above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency

12 CFR Part 3

[Docket No. 95-18]

RIN 1557—AB14

Capital; Risk-Based Capital

Guidelines; Capital Adequacy

Guidelines; Capital Maintenance

Correction

In rule document 95-18772 beginning

on page 39226 in the issue of Tuesday,

August 1, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 39229, in the first column, in

amendatory instruction 4 to appendix A

to part 3, in the second line, ‘‘(c)(3)’’

should read ‘‘(c)(2)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 60564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service
[INS No. 1775-96; AG Order No. 2124-97]
RIN 1115-AE26


Designation of Burundi Under Temporary Protected Status

Correction

    In notice document 97-29079 beginning on page 59735, in the issue 
of Tuesday, November 4, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 59736, in the first column, in the second paragragh 
designated (3), in the first line, ``specificially'' should read 
``specifically''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Tables of geographic positions, azimuths, and distances, together with lists of barometric altituudes, magnetic declinations, and itineraries of important routes, from data gathered by parties of the United States Geographical Surveys west of the 100th me      

      January 1, 1885    

View Document

Through the following tables there are presented, in accessible form, such portions of the more important numerical results of this Survey, from the year 1873 to 1879, inclusive, as it has been found neeessar, to compute pari passu with the plottings made from the field notes, together with such additional determinations as may have been required in the construction of the final atlas sheets. The speed with which results were demanded and produced during the years that field observations were in progress, and the subsequent paucity in office assistance, have rendered it impossible to exhaust the subject under any one of the headings found in the contents. Such results, however, as would seem to be of the greatest general interest and usefulness have been collected in this volume, which is submitted to take a place among the miscellaneous publications of the Survey, wherein its importance will correspond in a measure to the number of positions, elevations, distances, &c. (of which there are many), not hitherto in print.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona;California;Colorado;Idaho;Montana;Nebraska;Nevada;New Mexico;Oregon;Wyoming
                  - Arizona
                  - california
                  - Colorado
                  - Idaho
                  - Montana
                  - Nebraska
                  - nevada
                  - new mexico
                  - Oregon
                  - Wyoming

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 34965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10626]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 123 / Friday, June 26, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 34965]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

15 CFR Part 280

[Docket Number: 970724177-8057-02]
RIN 0693-AB43


Procedures for Implementation of the Fastener Quality Act

Correction

    In rule document 98-9397 beginning on page 18260 in the issue of 
Tuesday, April 14, 1998, make the following corrections:


Sec. 280.2  [Corrected]

    1. On page 18272, in the second column, in Sec. 280.2, in the 
definition of Fastener Quality Assurance System (QAS), paragraph 
(2)(iii), in the ninth line, ``of'' should read ``or''.


Sec. 280.6  [Corrected]

    2. On page 18274, in the first column, in Sec. 280.6(c)(5)(vi), in 
the second line, ``conform'' and ``do not conform'' should read 
``conform'' and ``do not conform''.


Sec. 280.602  [Corrected]

    3. On page 18275, in the second column, in Sec. 280.602(o), in the 
second line, ``FOA'' should read ``FQA''.


Sec. 280.1010  [Corrected]

    4. On page 18278, in the second column, in Sec. 280.1010(b)(3)(vi), 
in the first line, ``authority of'' should read ``authority to''.


Sec. 280.1011  [Corrected]

    5. On page 18280, in the third column, Sec. 280.1011(c)(2)(v) 
should be added above Sec. 280.1011(c)(2)(vi) read as follows:
    ``(v) Be able to communicate effectively, both in writing and 
orally, in the required languages;''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Vulnerability and adaptation to climate-related fire impacts in rural and urban interior Alaska      

      February 1, 2009    

This paper explores whether fundamental differences exist between urban and rural vulnerability to climate-induced changes in the fire regime of interior Alaska. We further examine how communities and fire managers have responded to these changes and what additional adaptations could be put in place. We engage a variety of social science methods, including demographic analysis, semi-structured interviews, surveys, workshops and observations of public meetings. This work is part of an interdisciplinary study of feedback and interactions between climate, vegetation, fire and human components of the Boreal forest social–ecological system of interior Alaska. We have learned that although urban and rural communities in interior Alaska face similar increased exposure to wildfire as a result of climate change, important differences exist in their sensitivity to these biophysical, climate-induced changes. In particular, reliance on wild foods, delayed suppression response, financial resources and institutional connections vary between urban and rural communities. These differences depend largely on social, economic and institutional factors, and are not necessarily related to biophysical climate impacts per se. Fire management and suppression action motivated by political, economic or other pressures can serve as unintentional or indirect adaptation to climate change. However, this indirect response alone may not sufficiently reduce vulnerability to a changing fire regime. More deliberate and strategic responses may be required, given the magnitude of the expected climate change and the likelihood of an intensification of the fire regime in interior Alaska.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           ShakeAlert—An earthquake early warning system for the United States west coast      

      August 29, 2014    

Version History

View Report

Earthquake early warning systems use earthquake science and the technology of monitoring systems to alert devices and people when shaking waves generated by an earthquake are expected to arrive at their location. The seconds to minutes of advance warning can allow people and systems to take actions to protect life and property from destructive shaking. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in collaboration with several partners, has been working to develop an early warning system for the United States. ShakeAlert, a system currently under development, is designed to cover the West Coast States of California, Oregon, and Washington.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Natural Hazards Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - california
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Washington

View All **
Jose Guillermo ARCE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

49008

Vol. 61, No. 181

Tuesday, September 17, 1996

DEFENSE OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 219

[DFARS Case 96-D304]

Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement;

Comperhensive Subcontracting Plans

Correction

In rule document 96–19413 beginning

on page 39900 in the issue of

Wednesday, July 31, 1996, make the

following correction:

219.702 [Corrected]

On page 39900, in the third column,

in the heading of section 219.702,

remove ‘‘and’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Statement of Organization, Functions

and Delegations of Authority;

Assistant Secretary for Management

and Budget

Correction

In notice document 96–21360

beginning on page 43363 in the issue of

Thursday, August 22, 1996 make the

following correction:

On page 43365, in the third column,

above the signature ‘‘John J. Callahan’’,

‘‘Dated: August 24, 1996’’ should read

‘‘Dated: July 24, 1996’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Part 2560

RIN 1004-AC90

Alaska Occupany and Use; Alaska

Homestead Settlement

Correction

Final Rule document 96-22704 was

inadvertently published in the Proposed

Rules section of the issue of Tuesday,

September 10, 1996, beginning on page

47724. It should have appeared in the

Rules and Regulations section.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Revisiting the Apollo photogrammetric mapping system      

      December 31, 2018    

The integrated photogrammetric mapping system flown on the last three Apollo lunar missions (15, 16, and 17) in 1971 and 1972 incorporated a Metric (mapping) Camera, a high-resolution Panoramic Camera, and a star camera and laser altimeter to provide support data. The U.S. Geological Survey’s Astrogeology Science Center, the Intelligent Robotics Group of the NASA Ames Research Center, and Arizona State University are working together in an ongoing collaboration to achieve the most complete cartographic development of Apollo mapping system data into versatile digital map products. These will enable a variety of scientific/engineering uses of the data including mission planning, geologic mapping, geophysical process modelling, slope dependent correction of spectral data, and change detection. After a brief discussion of the origins of the mapping system, we describe the Metric and Panoramic cameras, processing of the associated image and support data, work to photogrammetrically control the Metric Camera images, and future plans.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - moon

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Radioactive rare-earth deposit at Scrub Oaks mine, Morris County, New Jersey      

      January 1, 1959    

View Report

View Plate 1

A deposit of rare-earth minerals in the Scrub Oaks iron mine, Morris County, N. J., was mapped and sampled in 1955. The rare-earth minerals are mainly in coarse-grained magnetite ore and in pegmatite adjacent to it. Discrete bodies of rare-earth-bearing magnetite ore apparently follow the plunge of the main magnetite ore body at the north end of the mine. Radioactivity of the ore containing rare earths is about 0.2 to 0.6 mllliroentgens per hour. 

The principal minerals of the deposit are quartz, magnetite, hematite, albiteoligoclase, perthite and antiperthite. Xenotime and doverite aggregates and bastnaesite with intermixed leucoxene are the most abundant rare-earth minerals, and zircon, sphene, chevkinite, apatite, and monazite are of minor abundance in the ore. The rare-earth elements are partly differentiated into cerium-rich bastnaesite, chevkinite, and monazite, and yttrium-rich xenotime and doverite. Apatite, zircon, and sphene contain both cerium and yttrium group earths. 

Eleven samples of radioactive ore and rock average 0.009 percent uranium, 0.062 percent thorium, 1.51 percent combined rare-earth oxides including yttrium oxide and 24.8 percent iron. Scatter diagrams of sample data show a direct correlation between equivalent uranium, uranium, thorium, and combined rare^ earth oxides. Both cerium- and yttrium-group earths are abundant in the rare-earth minerals. 

Radioactive magnetite ore containing rare-earth minerals probably formed as a variant of the magnetite mineralization that produced the main iron ore of the Scrub Oaks deposit. The rare-earth minerals and the iron ore were deposited contemporaneously. Zircon crystals, probably deposited at the same time, have been determined by the Larsen method to be about 550 to 600 million years old (late Precambrian age). 

Uranium, thorium, and rare-earth elements are potential byproducts of iron in the coarse-grained magnetite ore.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Scrub Oaks mine
                  - New Jersey

View All **
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0254 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 047 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2013 - 03 - 08 - 142729 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **b y issue**  (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources of Wisconsin: Lower Wisconsin River basin      

      January 1, 1974    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

This report describes the physical environment, availability, distribution, movement, quality, and use of water in the upper Wisconsin River basin as an aid in planning and water management. The report presents general information on the basin derived from data obtained from Federal, State, and local agencies, New field data were collected in areas where information was lacking. More detailed studies of problem areas may be required in the future, as water needs and related development increase.

The upper Wisconsin River basin is the headwaters of the Wisconsin River drainage and includes about 2,730 square miles in northern Wisconsin (upstream from the gage on the Wisconsin River at Merrill). An additional 50 square miles of the basin lies in Michigan and is not covered by this report. The report area includes parts of Forest, Langlade, Lincoln, Marathon, Oneida, Price, Taylor, and Vilas Counties,

Many organizations and persons assisted the study by providing data. Among the contributors were the University of Wisconsin-Extension, Geological and Natural History Survey, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, and the Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company, Municipal water officials furnished water-supply information and well records, Many individuals allowed access to their wells for water-level measurements and collection of water samples for chemical analysis.

 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Baraboo River
                  -  Black Earth Creek
                  -  Kickapoo River
                  -  Knapp Creek
                  -  Nederlo Creek
                  -  Wisconsin River
                  - wisconsin

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 164 (Tuesday, August 25, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10825]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 164 / Tuesday, August 25, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 45296]]



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

Correction

    In notice document 98-18872 beginning on page 38242 in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 15, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 38242, in the first column, in the DATES section, in the 
third line, ``July 17, 1998'' should read ``August 14, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
S. 3642 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To clarify the scope of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

Section 1832(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or included 

in a product that is produced for or placed in’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

product or service used in or intended for use in’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.