alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Soil texture drives responses of soil respiration to precipitation pulses in the sonoran desert: Implications for climate change      

      January 1, 2008    

Climate change predictions for the desert southwestern U.S. are for shifts in precipitation patterns. The impacts of climate change may be significant, because desert soil processes are strongly controlled by precipitation inputs ('pulses') via their effect on soil water availability. This study examined the response of soil respiration-an important biological process that affects soil carbon (C) storage-to variation in pulses representative of climate change scenarios for the Sonoran Desert. Because deserts are mosaics of different plant cover types and soil textures-which create patchiness in soil respiration-we examined how these landscape characteristics interact to affect the response of soil respiration to pulses. Pulses were applied to experimental plots of bare and vegetated soil on contrasting soil textures typical of Sonoran Desert grasslands. The data were analyzed within a Bayesian framework to: (1) determine pulse size and antecedent moisture (soil moisture prior to the pulse) effects on soil respiration, (2) quantify soil texture (coarse vs. fine) and cover type (bare vs. vegetated) effects on the response of soil respiration and its components (plant vs. microbial) to pulses, and (3) explore the relationship between long-term variation in pulse regimes and seasonal soil respiration. Regarding objective (1), larger pulses resulted in higher respiration rates, particularly from vegetated fine-textured soil, and dry antecedent conditions amplified respiration responses to pulses (wet antecedent conditions dampened the pulse response). Regarding (2), autotrophic (plant) activity was a significant source (???60%) of respiration and was more sensitive to pulses on coarse- versus fine-textured soils. The sensitivity of heterotrophic (microbial) respiration to pulses was highly dependent on antecedent soil water. Regarding (3), seasonal soil respiration was predicted to increase with both growing season precipitation and mean pulse size (but only for pulses between 7 and 25 mm). Thus, the heterogeneity of the desert landscape and the timing or the number of medium-sized pulses is expected to significantly impact desert soil C loss with climate change. ?? 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

## Citation Information
5123-N-2981

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE:

MARCO T. BARRIOS

MARIA BARRIOS

 DEBTORS

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 20-19836-AJC

NOTICE OF ADDRESS CHANGE

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that 

the notice address and payment address for the below mentioned Creditor has changed. Please update the case and claims 

register with the new information outlined below.

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC 12-1 6149

Creditor Name Court Claim # Last Four Digits of Acct.#

Name and Address where notices should be sent:

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

6200 S. Quebec Street

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Phone: (800) 315-4757

Name and Address where payments should be sent:

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

6200 S. Quebec Street

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Phone: (800) 315-4757

Dated: 10/30/2020

Respectfully submitted,

Bonial & Associates, P.C. 

/s/ Natalie Lea

Natalie Lea

14841 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300

Dallas, Texas 75254

(972) 643-6600

(972) 643-6698 (Telecopier)

E-mail: POCInquiries@BonialPC.com

Authorized Agent for Creditor

Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 26 Filed 11/01/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

RE: Arminda Cespedes Case Number 20-20169-RAM 

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this deficiency

is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE RECEIVED

BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION

HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely filed/received by the trustee

may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this case. Call the Trustee's case

administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee reserves the right to raise additional

objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and reviewed for possible issues raised and

additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the Trustee. 

The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. The Court may

dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for March 9, 2021 hearing. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to

"re-sending" documents) REVIEWED DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY 2/19/2021

BAR DATE: 11/27 (LF 76 not filed)

2A Plan served 11/20 

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Dismiss unless resolved on or before 3/11: Remains unresolved from 1/12 a) increase Chapter 7 by gift to

$15,016.40

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

Case 20-20169-RAM Doc 50 Filed 02/23/21 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-8003
RENARD NELSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-615) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Renard Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Renard Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeNelson v. Stansberry , No. CA-04-615 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Some experiments in extreme-value statistical modeling of magnetic superstorm intensities      

      December 27, 2019    

In support of projects for forecasting and mitigating the deleterious effects of extreme space-weather storms, an examination is made of the intensities of magnetic superstorms recorded in the Dst index time series (1957-2016). Modified peak-over-threshold and solar-cycle, block-maximum sampling of the Dst time series are performed to obtain compi-lations of storm-maximum −Dstm intensity values. Lognormal, upper-limit lognormal, generalized Pareto, and generalized extreme-value model distributions are fitted to the−Dstm data using a maximum-likelihood algorithm. All four candidate models provide good representations of the data. Comparisons of the statistical significance and good-ness of fits of the various models gives no clear indication as to which model is best. The statistical models are used to extrapolate to extreme-value intensities, such as would be expected (on average) to occur once per century. An upper-limit lognormal fit to peak-over-threshold −Dstm data above a superstorm threshold of 283 nT gives a 100-year ex-trapolated intensity of 542 nT and a 68% confidence interval (obtained by bootstrap re-sampling) of [466, 583] nT. An upper-limit lognormal fit to solar-cycle, block-maximum−DstBM data gives a 9-solar-cycle (approximately 100-year) extrapolated intensity of 553 nT. The Dst data are found to be insufficient for providing usefully accurate esti-mates of a statistically theoretical upper limit for magnetic storm intensity. Secular change in storm intensities is noted, as is a need for improved estimates of pre-1957 magnetic storm intensities.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

15868

Vol. 61, No. 69

Tuesday, April 9, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 159 and 160

[CGD 93-055]

RIN 2115-AE58

Approval of Inflatable Personal

Flotation Devices (PFDs) for

Recreational Boaters

Correction

In rule document 96–7302 beginning

on page 13924, in the issue of Thursday,

March 28, 1996, make the following

corrections:

§159.010-7 [Corrected]

1. On page 13929, in the first column,

in §159.010-7 (b)(9)(vii) was designated

incorrectly the second time and the

paragraph should read ‘‘(viii)’’.

§160.048-7 [Corrected]

2. On page 13930, in the first column,

in §160.048-7, in the second line, ‘‘(b)’’

should read ‘‘(d)’’.

§160.077-9 [Corrected]

3. On page 13931, in the second

column, in §160.077-9 (a), in the fourth

line, ‘‘159.055’’ should read ‘‘159.005’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 160

[CGD 94-110]

RIN 2115-AE96

Recreational Inflatable Personal

Flotation Device Standards

Correction

In rule document 96–7301 beginning

on page 13931, in the issue of Thursday,

March 28, 1996, make the following

correction:

§160.076-29 [Corrected]

On page 13946, in the third column,

in §160.076-29, in the two tables, in the

heading of the two tables entitled

‘‘Number of Samples Per Lot (Lot size)’’,

‘‘(Lot size)’’ should be a separate

heading that is located above the word

‘‘Tests:’’ in both tables.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syscan Imaging, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Hawkins, Chief Operating Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 22, 2005                 /s/ William Hawkins
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      William Hawkins, Acting Chief Financial
                                      Officer, Chief Operating Officer and
                                      Secretary

      This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Thornton J.  Donaldson,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of CanWest  Petroleum
Corporation (f/k/a Uranium Power Corporation) (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
ended October 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 20, 2004


                                        By: /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name:  Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        Title: Chief Executive
                                               Officer
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re

Israel Garcia

Ana Garcia Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

RETAINER/FLAT FEE BLEND

Pursuant to retainer agreement the client agrees to compensate in such amount as is approved by the Bankruptcy Court in accordance

with the terms and conditions of the Chapter 13 Plan. t.

Agreed hourly fee $ 385.00

Fees received prior to the case $ 2426.00

Balance Due $ subject to hourly rate

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

Debtor Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

Debtor Other (specify):

4. I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

 Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

June 12, 2020 /s/Rachamin Cohen

Date

Signature of Attorney

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-15131-LMI Doc 23 Filed 06/15/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4975 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Petty Officer 

1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2016 

Mr. ASHFORD (for himself, Mr. FORTENBERRY, and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ‘‘Petty Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS CALEB A. NELSON 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 5720 South 142nd Street in 

7 Omaha, Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4975 IH

1 ‘‘Petty Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Petty Officer 1st Class 

7 Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thornton J. Donaldson, the Chief Executive Officer of CanWest Petroleum
Corporation (f/k/a Uranium Power Corporation) (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended July 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: September 16, 2005


                                        By: /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name: Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
VERIFICATION BY CERTIFICATION

Under penalties as provided by law, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth 

in the Motion to Compel Assumption or Rejection of an Executory Contract and for Allowance of 

an Administrative Claim are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on 

information and belief, and as to such matters, the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that she verily 

believes the same to be true. 

Declared under penalty of perjury this 23rd day of February 2021. 

Glenda 

Werkman

Senior Loss Mitigation Specialist

U.S. Bank National Association d/b/a

U.S. Bank Equipment Finance

Case 20-21883-SMG Doc 150-1 Filed 03/09/21 Page 1 of 1
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

27659

Vol. 62, No. 97

Tuesday, May 20, 1997

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING

COMMINSION

17 CFR Parts 1, 15, 16, and 17

Recordkeeping; Reports by Futures

Commission Merchants, Clearing

Members, Foreign Brokers, and Large

Traders

Correction

In rule document 97–11396,

beginning on page 24026 in the issue of

Friday May 2, 1997, make the

followinmg corrections:

1. On page 24031, in the second

column, in amendatory instruction 4., in

the second line, ‘‘(1)’’ should read ‘‘(l)’’.

§ 15.00 [Corrected]

2. On page 24031, in the third

column, in § 15.00, the paragraph

designation ‘‘(1)’’ should read ‘‘(l)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 108, 110, 111, 112, 113,

and 161

[CGD 94-108]

RIN 2115-AF24

Electrical Engineering Requirments for

Merchant Vessels

Correction

In rule document 97–11230 beginning

on page 23894 in the issue of Thursday,

May 1, 1997, make the following

correction:

§ 110.15-1 [Corrected]

1. On page 23907, in the first column,

in §110.15-1, in the fourth line ‘‘EMA’’

should read ‘‘NEMA’’.

§ 111.60-11 [Corrected]]

2. On page 23908, in the third

column, in § 111.60-11 paragraph (c), in

the third line, ‘‘IL-W-76D’’ should read

‘‘MIL-W-76D;’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AWP-21]

Establishment of Class E Airspace;

Truckee, CA

Correction

In rule document 97–9577 appearing

on page 18038 in the issue of Monday,

April 14, 1997 make the following

correction:

§71.1 [Corrected]

In the third column, in §71.1, ‘‘AWP

CA 3% Truckee, CA [New]’’ should read

‘‘AWP CA E5 Truckee, CA [New]’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AGL-38]

Modification of Class E Airspace;

Mineral Point, WI, Iowa County Airport

Correction

In rule document 97–9131 appearing

on page 17057 in the issue of

Wednesday, April 9, 1997 make the

following correction:

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

In the second column, in §71.1, in the

last line ‘‘long. 90°13′55′′W’’ should

read ‘‘long. 90°13′35′′W’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D