alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Small impact craters in the lunar regolith - Their morphologies, relative ages, and rates of formation      

      January 1, 1980    

Apparently, there are two types of size-frequency distributions of small lunar craters (???1-100 m across): (1) crater production distributions for which the cumulative frequency of craters is an inverse function of diameter to power near 2.8, and (2) steady-state distributions for which the cumulative frequency of craters is inversely proportional to the square of their diameters. According to theory, cumulative frequencies of craters in each morphologic category within the steady-state should also be an inverse function of the square of their diameters. Some data on frequency distribution of craters by morphologic types are approximately consistent with theory, whereas other data are inconsistent with theory. A flux of crater producing objects can be inferred from size-frequency distributions of small craters on the flanks and ejecta of craters of known age. Crater frequency distributions and data on the craters Tycho, North Ray, Cone, and South Ray, when compared with the flux of objects measured by the Apollo Passive Seismometer, suggest that the flux of objects has been relatively constant over the last 100 m.y. (within 1/3 to 3 times of the flux estimated for Tycho). Steady-state frequency distributions for craters in several morphologic categories formed the basis for estimating the relative ages of craters and surfaces in a system used during the Apollo landing site mapping program of the U.S. Geological Survey. The relative ages in this system are converted to model absolute ages that have a rather broad range of values. The range of values of the absolute ages are between about 1/3 to 3 times the assigned model absolute age. ?? 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Co.

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 61426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-402]


Certain Integrated Circuits and Products Containing Same; Notice 
of Investigation

Correction

    In notice document 97-29269 beginning on page 59880, in the issue 
of Wednesday, November 5, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 59881, in the first column, in the fourth line ``September 
29, 1997'' should read ``October 29, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Progress toward a safer future since the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake      

      November 1, 1999    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7034

JAMES DONALD PRITCHETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-98-123-R)

Submitted: February 9, 1999 Decided: March 15, 1999

Before ERVIN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Donald Pritchett, Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James D. Pritchett seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration. As to the

denial of his § 2254 petition, Pritchett’s notice of appeal is

untimely, and we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Pritchett had

thirty days to note an appeal from the district court’s May 28,

1998 order. His notice of appeal was dated July 8, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(a)

(1). Pritchett’s failure to note a timely appeal or to obtain an

extension of the appeal period deprives us of jurisdiction to review the May 28 order. Because Pritchett’s motion for reconsideration was filed more than ten days after the May 28 order, it did

not toll the appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). As for

the court’s denial of the motion for reconsideration, we have

reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as to both orders. Pritchett v.

Angelone, No. CA-98-123-R (W.D. Va. May 28 & July 1, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4777 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, Alabama 

as the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4777 EH

1 SECTION 1. AMELIA BOYNTON ROBINSON POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, 

5 Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Amelia 

6 Boynton Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Rob11 inson Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4777 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postson Post Office Building’’. Selma, Alabama as the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Robin- al Service located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in
Steven DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, David Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date: March 29, 2004           /s/ David Wilson
                               ----------------
                               David Wilson
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                               Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kirby HUNTER

NO. 2018-KH-0706

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 19117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40430]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 268

[EPA # 530-Z-96-002; FRL-5438-3]
RIN 2050-AD38


Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III -- Decharacterized 
Wastewaters, Carbamate Wastes, and Spent Potliners

Correction

    In rule document 96-7597 beginning on page 15566 in the issue of 
Monday, April 8, 1996 make the following corrections:
     On page 15566, in the first column, in the penultimate line ``July 
1, 1996'' should read ``July 8, 1996''.


Sec. 268.39  [Corrected]

     On page 15599, in the third column, in Sec. 268.39(c), in the 
first line ``July 8, 1996'' should read ``January 8, 1997''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9841]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa8e889b9e9f9b949b9683899389ba9c9799d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="057177646160646b64697c766c76456368662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Agreement No.: 012057-003.
    Title: CMA CGM/Maersk Line Space Charter, Sailing and Cooperative 
Working Agreement Asia to USEC and PNW-Suez/PNW & Panama Loops.
    Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and CMA CGM S.A.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher and Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment would add Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd. 
as a party to the agreement, delete Singapore from the geographic 
scope, make adjustments in vessel provision, revise the duration of the 
agreement, and restate the agreement. The parties request expedited 
review.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: April 24, 2009.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9841 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           State-dependent behavior alters endocrine–energy relationship: Implications for conservation and management      

      November 8, 2017    

Glucocorticoids (GC) and triiodothyronine (T3) are two endocrine markers commonly used to quantify resource limitation, yet the relationships between these markers and the energetic state of animals has been studied primarily in small-bodied species in captivity. Free-ranging animals, however, adjust energy intake in accordance with their energy reserves, a behavior known as state-dependent foraging. Further, links between life-history strategies and metabolic allometries cause energy intake and energy reserves to be more strongly coupled in small animals relative to large animals. Because GC and T3 may reflect energy intake or energy reserves, state-dependent foraging and body size may cause endocrine–energy relationships to vary among taxa and environments. To extend the utility of endocrine markers to large-bodied, free-ranging animals, we evaluated how state-dependent foraging, energy reserves, and energy intake influenced fecal GC and fecal T3 concentrations in free-ranging moose (Alces alces). Compared with individuals possessing abundant energy reserves, individuals with few energy reserves had higher energy intake and high fecal T3 concentrations, thereby supporting state-dependent foraging. Although fecal GC did not vary strongly with energy reserves, individuals with higher fecal GC tended to have fewer energy reserves and substantially greater energy intake than those with low fecal GC. Consequently, individuals with greater energy intake had both high fecal T3 and high fecal GC concentrations, a pattern inconsistent with previous documentation from captive animal studies. We posit that a positive relationship between GC and T3 may be expected in animals exhibiting state-dependent foraging if GC is associated with increased foraging and energy intake. Thus, we recommend that additional investigations of GC– and T3–energy relationships be conducted in free-ranging animals across a diversity of body size and life-history strategies before these endocrine markers are applied broadly to wildlife conservation and management.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Matthew Kauffman, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mkauffman@usgs.gov

307-766-6404

## Related Content

#### Matthew Kauffman, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mkauffman@usgs.gov

307-766-6404

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Greater YellowstoneEcosystem
                  - Wyoming

View All **
Altonio RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2963

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jessica Renee ROGERS v. STATE

CR-15-1383

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.34





AGREEMENT





This agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of the 7th day of May, 2010 by and between Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company with its principal place of business located at 222 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116  (“Licensor”), and Findex.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business located at 620 North 129th Street, Omaha, NE 68154 (“Licensee”) (Licensor and Licensee shall be referred to hereinafter individually as a “party” and jointly as the “parties”).





WHEREAS, Licensor is the current owner of certain intellectual property (the “Intellectual Property”) which was licensed to Licensee pursuant to a certain Software License Agreement dated June 30, 1999 between Licensee and Parsons Technology, Inc., a California corporation, a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit A (as amended to date, the “License Agreement”);





WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 5.1 of the License Agreement, the term of the License Agreement is due to expire on June 29, 2009;





WHEREAS, Licensee desires at this time to acquire outright ownership of the Intellectual Property to avoid the reversion to Licensor, upon expiration of the License Agreement, of any rights in the Intellectual Property upon which Licensee may depend for continuity in certain of its business lines; and





WHEREAS, in accordance with and subject to the terms hereof, Licensor desires to convey to Licensee outright ownership of the Intellectual Property;





NOW, the parties hereby agree as follows:





1.           Conveyance of Intellectual Property.  In consideration of an amount in cash equal to ten thousand dollars ($10,000), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Licensor hereby irrevocably conveys and assigns to Licensee any and all rights it currently possesses of any kind whatsoever in and to the Intellectual Property; provided, however, that Licensor and/or its assignees shall have the continuing right, license and permission in perpetuity to include in any software products that it sells or has sold any base code used in or otherwise associated with the product QuickVerse at the time of the License Agreement.





2.           Entire Agreement.  This Agreement contains the entire understanding and agreement between or among the parties hereto with respect to its subject matter and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, representations or warranties between or among them respecting the subject matter hereof.





3.           Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and all actions arising hereunder shall be governed by, the laws of the State of California.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed as of the day and year first above written.




Houghton Mifflin Harcourt


FindEx.com, Inc.Publishing Company/s/ Kirsten Mellor


/s/ Steven MaloneName: Kirsten Mellor


Name: Steven MaloneTitle: Vice President


Title: Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of AP HENDERSON GROUP (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery
Co, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)
         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date: August 23, 2004.                          /s/  Jeffery Co
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Jeffery Co
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 175 (Monday, September 11, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 47205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20911]




Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 175/Monday, September 11, 1995/
Corrections

[[Page 47205]]


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 176

[Docket No. 91-F-0339]


Indirect Food Additives: Paper and Paperboard Components

Correction

    In final rule document 95-16092 beginning on page 34134 in the 
issue of Friday, June 30, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 34134, in the second column, in the DATES section, August 
29, 1995 should read July 31, 1995.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

31225

Vol. 61, No. 119

Wednesday, June 19, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

President’s Advisory Commission on

Educational Excellence for Hispanic

Americans; Meeting

Correction

In notice document 96–14566

appearing on page 29362 in the issue of

Monday, June 10, 1996, in the second

column, TIME: should read ‘‘8 a.m. - 5:30

p.m. (est) and 1:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. (est).’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH92-1 & OH79-3; FRL-5458-8]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans and Designation

of Areas for Air Quality Planning

Purposes; Ohio

Correction

In rule document 96–11133 beginning

on page 20458 in the issue of Tuesday,

May 7, 1996, make the following

correction:

§ 52.1885 [Corrected]

On page 20472, in the third column,

in § 52.1885, in paragraph (b), the

paragraph designated ‘‘(9)’’ should read

‘‘(10)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We have issued our reports dated March 13, 2006, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of DigimarcCorporation included in the Annual Report of Digimarc Corporation on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005.  Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in theregistration statements of Digimarc Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108670,effective September 10, 2003) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-128096,effective September 2, 2005, File No. 333-31114, effective February 25,2000, File No. 333-42042, effective July 24, 2000, File No. 333-65256,effective July 17, 2001, File No. 333-82660, effective February 13,2002, File No. 333-105097, effective May 8, 2003, and File No. 333-115074,effective April 30, 2004).

 

 
| /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |
| Portland, Oregon       |
| March 13, 2006    |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT OF PAULINE O. WALKER DATED JULY 17, 2001, AS AMENDED JUNE 9, 2014

PETITION OF: KATHERINE W.

BANTLEON AND ELIZABETH W. MECKE :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 158 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Sysview Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

      (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
      2007 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                Date: May 15, 2007

                                /S/ DARWIN HU
                                -------------
                                Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.