alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0530 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 - SW - 075 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50511]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.11


 


 


 


June
30, 2017


  


Via
Email: jeffbeverly@growsolutionsinc.com


 


GROW
SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC.


ONE
LOVE GARDEN SUPPLY LLC


1111
Broadway - Suite 406


Denver,
CO 80203


Attention:
Jeffrey Beverly


 


Account
Number(s): PLG-2137; CPG-1040


 


Mr.
Beverly:


 


This
letter serves as confirmation with respect to your discussion of today with Seth Kramer, President of Power Up Lending Group Ltd.
(“PowerUp”), in connection with an agreement to stay any collection and litigation with respect to the following defaulted
accounts with PowerUp:


 


	1)	CPG-1040:
                                         Convertible Note in the amount of $125,000.00 dated January 19, 2017 of GROW SOLUTIONS
                                         HOLDINGS, INC. (“GRSO”) in favor of PowerUp (“Note”); and
	 	 
	2)	PLG-2137:
                                         Receivables Purchase Agreement of ONE LOVE GARDEN SUPPLY LLC (“Subsidiary”)
                                         dated March 3, 2017 whereby PowerUp purchased $139,000.00 of receivables of Subsidiary
                                         for $100,000.00 (“Advance” and together with the Note, collectively, the
                                         “Accounts”).



 


As
a result of the defaults, the balance of the Note is $198,222.60 (the sum of: (i) 125,000.00 * 1.5 (default amount) = 187,500.00;
and (ii) 2,246.57 (accrued interest) + 8,476.027 (default interest)); and the balance of the Advance is


$48,539.24.
The aggregate balance of the Accounts is $246,761.84


 


As
discussed, PowerUp has agreed to cease any collection efforts and litigation with respect to the Accounts, provided that the daily
ACH payment to PowerUp pursuant to the Advance is increased from $1,103.18 to $1,592.01 per business day until such time as the
Advance and the Note have been paid in full (or with respect to the Note, converted into shares of common stock of GRSO pursuant
to the terms of the Note in the sole discretion of PowerUp). The increased portion of the modified payment (1,592.01 - 1,103.18
= 488.83) will be applied to reduce the balance of the Note. Except with respect to the increase of the daily payment, the terms
of the Advance and the Note shall remain in full force and effect (including but not limited to the right of PowerUp to convert
the Note into shares of common stock of GRSO).





 


In
the event of a failure to make any daily ACH payment as set forth above when due, this agreement to cease any collection efforts
and litigation with respect to the Accounts shall be revoked and of no force or effect. Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing
by countersigning this letter and completing, signing and returning the attached ACH form to my attention.


 


	Thank
    you,	 	 
	POWER
    UP LENDING GROUP, LTD.	 	 
	 	 	 
	Stephen
    Czarnik	 	 






 





	Accepted
    and Agreed:	 	 
	GROW SOLUTIONS
    HOLDINGS, INC.	 	ONE LOVE
    GARDEN SUPPLY LLC



  


	By:
    	 	 	By:
    	 
	 	Jeffrey Beverly,
    President	 	 	Jeffrey Beverly,
    President
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Submarine landslides and volcanic features on Kohala and Mauna Kea volcanoes and the Hana Ridge, Hawaii      

      October 10, 2002    

The deep submarine eastern flanks of Mauna Kea, Kohala, and Haleakala volcanoes were mapped for the first time with a multibeam bathymetric and sidescan sonar system during joint Japan-US cruises aboard the JAMSTEC vessel R/V Yokosuka in 1999. The Pololu slump off northeast Kohala is overlain by a carbonate platform in the shallow region and the deeper areas are incised by downslope oriented channels. It is cut by several faults and slump scars and appears to override an older slide located farther east, here named the Laupahoehoe slump. The structures characteristic of the Laupahoehoe slump are NW-SE oriented scarp-and-bench topographic features analogous to the Hilina slump on the mobile SE flank of Kilauea. Enclosed basins lie at 3000-5000 m, fronted by ridges on their seaward sides. The basins may result from local rotational slumps or from uplift above discontinuous thrust faults. The Laupahoehoe slump appears to be overlapped by shield margins of both Kohala and Mauna Kea and thus may have been derived from an elongate Kohala edifice. A large debris apron continues from the base of the two-slide complex, abutting the distal Hana Ridge (Haleakala east rift zone). The tip of the Hana Ridge displays a curious steepsided arcuate rift tip that resembles the classic amphitheater scarp of a landslide. Numerous flat-topped volcanic domes are distributed along the broad crest of the lower rift zone. Similar cones, though fewer in number, are also present on the Hilo Ridge, which may be the continuation of a Kohala rift zone. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter W Lipman, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

plipman@usgs.gov

650-269-5295

## Related Content

#### Peter W Lipman, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

plipman@usgs.gov

650-269-5295

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Southeast flank of the island of Hawaii
                  - hawaii

View All **
Exhibit 32









Section 1350 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vault America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company"), hereby certifies that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended October 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 28, 2011



BY:  /s/ Harold F. Schultz

HAROLD F. SCHULTZ

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFER
John A. SHERIDAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0871

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Charles E. Robinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 6, 2003                 /s/  Charles E. Robinson
                                    ------------------------
                                    Charles E. Robinson
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chairman of the Board of
                                    Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
Case 19-20780-RAM Doc 19 Filed 09/20/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-20780-RAM Doc 19 Filed 09/20/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-20780-RAM Doc 19 Filed 09/20/19 Page 3 of 3
#### Judith Garden, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Virginia L. Mapel, Doing Business as The Gazebo, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

September 26, 1973.

*John A. Kiser*for appellant. *Richard A. Kerner*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Markowitz, P. J.,. Fine and Frank, JJ.
SCWC-11-0000760
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MICHAEL ROBLES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000760; CR. NO. 10-1-1469)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , M c K e n n a , a n d P o l l a c k , J J
. )

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michael Robles’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 24, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 4, 2013. William H. Jameson, Jr., for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000760 04-APR-2013 09:32 AM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VMH VideoMovieHouse.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Steven Gaspar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 24th  day of September, 2003.

| | /s/ Steven Gaspar
Steven Gaspar
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted May 30, 2013

Decided May 31, 2013

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 12‐2356

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND A. HOOD,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 08 CR 804‐3

Robert M. Dow, Jr.,

Judge.

O R D E R

Raymond Hood pleaded guilty to four counts of bank robbery. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 2113(a). In his plea agreement, Hood waived his right to appeal his conviction and

sentence. The district court imposed 125 months’ imprisonment for each count, to be served

concurrently. Hood filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer believes that the

appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 12‐2356 Page 2

(1967). Hood has not responded to counsel’s motion, see CIR. R. 51(b), and we confine our

review to the issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief, see United States v. Schuh,

289 F.3d 968, 973–74 (7th Cir. 2002).

Hood has informed counsel that he does not wish to challenge his guilty pleas, so

counsel properly omits from his Anders submission any discussion about the adequacy of

the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the pleas. See United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667,

671–72 (7th Cir. 2002). It follows, says counsel, that Hood’s appeal waiver makes this appeal

frivolous. We agree with counsel; because an appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty

plea, United States v. Sakellarion, 649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir. 2011), we must enforce Hood’s

waiver. Moreover, Hood’s sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum, see 18 U.S.C.

§§ 2113(a), 3559(a)(3), 3583(b)(2), and the district court did not rely on any

unconstitutionally impermissible factor when it imposed his sentence, see Dowell v. United

States, 694 F.3d 898, 902 (7th Cir. 2012).

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Overview for geologic field-trip guides to Mount Mazama, Crater Lake Caldera, and Newberry Volcano, Oregon      

      August 16, 2017    

View Report

These field-trip guides were written for the occasion of the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI) quadrennial scientific assembly in Portland, Oregon, in August 2017. The guide to Mount Mazama and Crater Lake caldera is an updated and expanded version of the guide (Bacon, 1989) for part of an earlier IAVCEI trip to the southern Cascade Range. The guide to Newberry Volcano describes the stops included in the 2017 field trip. Crater Lake and Newberry are the two best-preserved and most recent calderas in the Cascades Volcanic Arc. Although located in different settings in the arc, with Crater Lake on the arc axis and Newberry in the rear-arc, both volcanoes are located at the intersection of the arc and the northwest corner region of the extensional Basin and Range Province.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Charles R Bacon, PhD

##### Senior Research Geologist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

cbacon@usgs.gov

650-329-5246

#### Julie Donnelly-Nolan, PhD

##### Research Geologist

California Volcano Observatory

jdnolan@usgs.gov

650-329-5203

#### Heather M. Wright

##### Volcanologist - VDAP

Cascades Volcano Observatory

hwright@usgs.gov

360-993-8916

## Related Content

#### Charles R Bacon, PhD

##### Senior Research Geologist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

cbacon@usgs.gov

650-329-5246

#### Julie Donnelly-Nolan, PhD

##### Research Geologist

California Volcano Observatory

jdnolan@usgs.gov

650-329-5203

#### Heather M. Wright

##### Volcanologist - VDAP

Cascades Volcano Observatory

hwright@usgs.gov

360-993-8916

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon

View All **
*The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral

estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;

nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th

Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 6 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN T. BOOZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOHN SHANKS and ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW

MEXICO,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 97-2120

(D.C. No. CIV-93-1297-M)

(District of New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, MCKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

We have considered the record, the briefs of the parties, the district court’s

order, and the applicable law. We grant a certificate of appealability to consider

the issues raised in appellant’s brief, including specifically whether the alleged

failure of counsel to notify defendant of the adverse ruling of the Court of

Appeals of the State of New Mexico, denying him the option of electing to file an
- 2 -

application for writ of certiorari to the New Mexico Supreme Court on a pro se

basis or seek other assistance, constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel. 

For purposes of our disposition we note that it is undisputed that counsel

did not notify the defendant of such adverse ruling until after the time to file a

petition for certiorari had run. While the applicant cannot assert ineffective

assistance of counsel as to any failure on the part of his lawyer to file a petition

for certiorari to the New Mexico Supreme Court on his behalf, Wainwright v.

Torna, 455 U.S. 586, 588 (1982) (per curiam), here, where applicant was not even

notified of the adverse ruling and thus was denied the opportunity to take any

action himself, we presume prejudice and deem any procedural default to be

waived. Turning to the merits of appellant’s remaining claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel, we find no actual prejudice under Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). We AFFIRM for substantially the reasons

stated in the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition of United States

Magistrate Judge filed on January 27, 1997 and the district court’s order adopting

same. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Watershed modeling applications in south Texas      

      January 10, 2012    

Watershed models can be used to simulate natural and human-altered processes including the flow of water and associated transport of sediment, chemicals, nutrients, and microbial organisms within a watershed. Simulation of these processes is useful for addressing a wide range of water-resource challenges, such as quantifying changes in water availability over time, understanding the effects of development and land-use changes on water resources, quantifying changes in constituent loads and yields over time, and quantifying aquifer recharge temporally and spatially throughout a watershed.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with State and Federal agency partners, developed simulation models for several watersheds in south Texas. These models provide the capability to simulate scenarios of possible future conditions and management alternatives to help water-resource professionals with planning decisions. The program used for creating these Texas watershed models is the Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF). HSPF is one of the most comprehensive watershed modeling programs because it can simulate a variety of stream and watershed conditions with reasonable accuracy and enables flexibility in adjusting the model to simulate alternative conditions or scenarios. The HSPF model provides time-series data simulating water movement (runoff from land surfaces, infiltration of water through soil layers, flow in stream channels) and water-quality parameter values and constituent concentrations associated with the water movement at any selected location in the watershed. Time-series outputs from an HSPF simulation are continuous (for example, hourly or daily). Continuous models provide the advantage of simulating watershed processes for a full range of streamflow conditions. Continuous models can illustrate how processes that appreciably affect water-quality conditions during low flows might have relatively minor effects on water-quality conditions during high flows.

This fact sheet presents an overview of six selected watershed modeling studies by the USGS and partners that address a variety of water-resource issues in south Texas. These studies provide examples of modeling applications and demonstrate the usefulness and versatility of watershed models in aiding the understanding of hydrologic systems.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Diana E Pedraza

##### Geographer

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

dpedraza@usgs.gov

210-691-9237

## Related Content

#### Diana E Pedraza

##### Geographer

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

dpedraza@usgs.gov

210-691-9237

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center – Austin, TX Office

1505 Ferguson LaneAustin, TX78754United States

(512) 927-3500

(512) 927-3590 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - texas

View All **