alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE: Comments received on the EPA's proposed approval of the NH RH SIP 

Martone, Charles H to: Anne McWilliams 06/26/2012 10:09 AM 

Cc: Anne Arnold, "Hoffman, Barbara", "Underhill, Jeff' 

From: "Martone, Charles H" <CharIes.Martone@des.nh.gov> 

To: Anne McWilliams/R1/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Anne Arnold/R1/USEPA/US@EPA, Hoffman, Barbara" <Barbara .Hoffman@des.nh.yov>, 

"Underhill, Jeff' <Jeffrey .Underhill @des.nh.gov> 

ry : 

2 attachments 

This message has been replied to . 

6-2012 Revised BART Modeling Results - V2.doc CALPUFF S04BGG .LST 

Anne, 

As requested, NHDES revisited the BART modeling calculations with the conditions specified 

by the NPS in their comments. The first attachment, a tabulation of the BART modeling results, 

reflects your phone conversation with Jeff Underhill following your May 8 email request. 

The second attachment contains the results of the revised calculations and a sample CALPUFF 

(CALPOST) output file . 

Please note that NPS wanted the maximum possible BART unit impact occurring at the same 

time as the theoretical 20% best conditions are occurring. To do this with a southwest wind 

means all sources along the corridor would be turned off with only our source operating and 

providing a direct hit. It would also have to happen when biogenic sources are in dormancy. 

Jeff is your best contact for any technical questions related to the modeling analysis . 

Charlie 

Charles H. Martone, SIP Analyst 

New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services 

29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95 

Concord, NH 03302-0095 

phone: 603-271-1089 

fax : 603-271-7053 

email : charles .martone@des .nh.gov 

-----Original Message----- 

From : Anne McWilliams [mailto :mcwilliams .anne@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12 :09 PM 

To: Martone, Charles H ; Underhill, Jeff 

Subject : Comments received on the EPA's proposed approval of the NH RH SIP 

Hi, 

Attached are comments we received on the proposed approval of the New Hampshire Regional 

Haze SIP. 
(See attached file : NH BART NPS Comments 4-26-12 Letter .pdf)(See attached file : 

Sierra Club NH Haze SIP approval comments[1] .pdf) 

I will need some additional BART modeling data (highest impact) for our response to comments. 

Thanks! 

Anne 

Anne McWilliams 

Air Quality Planning 

EPA - New England 

Tel : 617 918-1697 

Fax: 617 918-0697 

""'' New Mailing Address After December 14, 2009"""" 

EPA Region 1 

Five Post Office Square - Suite 100 

Mail Code - OEP05-02 

Boston, MA 02109-3912
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Triptych Miami Holdings, LLC Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 11

LIST OF EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS

Following is the list of the Debtor's equity security holders which is prepared in accordance with rule 1007(a)(3) for filing in this Chapter 11 Case

Name and last known address or place of

business of holder

Security Class Number of Securities Kind of Interest

HES Triptych Holding LLC

1001 SW 2nd Ave.

Suite 300

Miami, FL 33130

100% Membership Interests

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY ON BEHALF OF CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP

I, the Managing Partner of the corporation named as the debtor in this case, declare under penalty of perjury that I

have read the foregoing List of Equity Security Holders and that it is true and correct to the best of my information and

belief.

Date March 12, 2021 Signature /s/ Francisco Arocha

Francisco Arocha

Penalty for making a false statement of concealing property: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years or both.

 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 and 3571.

Sheet 1 of 1 in List of Equity Security Holders

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 21-12375-RAM Doc 3 Filed 03/12/21 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARIO FANEAK WASHINGTON,
Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00063-LHT-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Faneak Washington, Appellant Pro Se. David Kenneth Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mario Faneak Washington appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Washington , No. 1:04-cr-00063-
LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Draft Appendix R – Chesapeake Bay TMDL for Nutrients and Sediment

R-1 September 24, 2010

Appendix R. Detailed Daily Chesapeake Bay TMDL WLAs and LAs

This appendix presents the detailed daily WLAs and LAs for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL for 

nutrients and sediment in the following spreadsheet:

Appendix R: Detailed Daily Chesapeake Bay TMDL WLAs and LAs for Proposed Amended 

WQS (Appendix R_ProposedWQS_DailyLoads_092410).

Appendix R includes detailed nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment daily allocations to achieve the 

proposed amended WQS (Section 8). The spreadsheet lists total nitrogen (TOTN), total 

phosphorus (TOTP) and total sediment (TSED) loads as both delivered to the Chesapeake Bay’s 

tidal waters and edge-of-stream (discharge to local waterbodies) (Section 9). Loading 

information is reported at both detailed and summary spatial scales and for both detailed and 

summary source categories – working from general at the top of the worksheet to more detailed 

towards the bottom of the worksheet. Finer scale allocations are shown for each of the 92 

segments and by sources for WLAs including agriculture (CAFOs), stormwater (MS4s), 

wastewater (CSO) and wastewater (significant and nonsignificant by NPDES permit); and for 

LAs including agriculture, forest, non-tidal atmospheric deposition, onsite treatment systems, 

and urban sources.
# NOTICE OF AGENCY RULE-MAKING PROPOSAL AGENCY: Department of Environmental Protection RULE TITLE: Graphic Arts - Lithograhy and Letterpress Printing PROPOSED RULE NUMBER : Chanter 161 CONCISE SUMMARY: The Department is proposing a new regulation that restricts volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions fromoffset lithography and letterpress printing operations
. Under Section 184 of the Clean AirAct Amendments of 1990, the State must submit plans to control VOCemissions fromall sources covered by a Control Technique Guideline (CTG) issued by US EPA
. This regulation requires all sources within this category to determine their emission levels and implement reasonable options for keeping such emissions at a minimum, in a cost effective way including: control technology approaches, VOC and composite vapor pressure limits and standards for work practices
. Additional information on this draft rule can be found at: http ://www .maine og v/dep/air/regulations/prouosed htm
. Pursuant to Maine law, interested parties must be publicly notified ofthe proposed rulemaking, the public hearing and be provided an opportunity for comment
. Any party interested in providing comment can testify at the public hearing or provide written comments before the end of the comment period
. All comments should be sent to the Agency contact person. 

### THIS RULE WILL WILL NOT X HAVE A FISCAL IMPACT ONMUNICIPALITIES STATUTORYAUTHORITY : 38 MRSA § 585-A PUBLIC HEARING

: August 6, 2009 9 :00 AM Holiday Inn Augusta, Maine ' DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS: August 16, 2009 5:00 P.M
. AGENCY CONTACT PERSON : Deborah Avalone-King AGENCY NAME : Bureau ofAir Quality Control Department of Environmental Protection 

### ADDRESS: 17 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 TELEPHONE: 207-287-70 28 FAX

:207-287-7641 

# FORPUBLICATION ONJuly 6, 2009 in KJ MAPA III
DAMVIX MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. EQUITY GROUP FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1909

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 32699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10615]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 32699]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 98-13868 appearing on page 28370 in the issue of 
Friday, May 22, 1998, make the following correction:
    In the first column, in the second document, under TIME AND DATE, 
in the second line ``15, 1998.'' should read ``5, 1998.''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/03/2013 07:49PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

From: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US

Date: 01/03/2013 05:14PM

Cc: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry

Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: Your comment regarding benefits in the RICE rule RIA

CortneyYou provided the following comment regarding the RICE rule RIA:

"Also, the benefit section makes a reference to the PM NAAQS RIA benefit methods for

updates in methods. As we recall, the understanding we have with the PM NAAQS RIA is that

it will not set a precedent for other air rule RIAs."

We are not aware of any agreement regarding limitations on the use of the PM NAAQS RIA

as a model for subsequent benefits analyses for EPA air rules. To the contrary, our plan

was always to introduce a set of updated input data and analytical methods in the PM NAAQS

RIA which would serve as a model for future RIAs. As such, we are noting in the RICE

change memo that the benefits methodology has been updated per the PM NAAQS RIA. We

anticipate that RIAs for future rules will use the updated benefits methodology for PM

benefits applied in the PM NAAQS RIA.

If you have a different understanding, please explain how you came to that conclusion.

Regards,

Bryan

Dr. Bryan J. Hubbell

Leader, Risk and Benefits Group

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. EPA/OAQPS (C504-02)

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-0621
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary report on the geology and ground-water supply of the Newark, New Jersey, area      

      January 1, 1951    

View Document

In the Newark area, ground water is used chiefly for industrial cooling, air-conditioning, general processing, and for sanitary purposes. A small amount is used in the manufacture of beverages. Total ground-water pumpage in Newark is estimated at not less than 20,000,000 gallons daily.

The Newark area is underlain by formations of Recent, Pleistocene and Triassic age, and the geology and hydrologic properties of these formations are discussed. Attention is called to the important influence of a buried valley in the rock floor beneath the Newark area on the yield of wells located within it. Data on the fluctuation of the water levels and the variation in pumpage are presented, and their significance discussed. The results of a pumping test made during the investigation were inconclusive. The beneficial results of artificially recharging the aquifers in one part of the area are described.

The intrusion of salt water into certain parts of the ground-water body is described and graphically portrayed by a map showing the chloride concentration of the ground water in various parts of the City. Insofar as available data permit, the chemical quality of the ground water is discussed and records are given of the ground-water temperatures in various parts of the City.

There has been marked lowering of the water table in the eastern part of the area, accompanied by salt water intrusion, indicating that the safe yield of the formations in this part of Newark has probably been exceeded. It is recommended that the study of the ground-water resources of this area be continued, and that artificial recharging of the aquifers be increased over as wide an area as possible.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - New Jersey

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-50508]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

37 CFR Part 1

[Docket No. 960417113-6113-01]
RIN 0651-AA82


Revision of Patent Fees for Fiscal Year 1997

Correction

    In proposed rule document 96-10765 beginning on page 19224, in the 
issue of Wednesday, May 1, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 19225, in the third column, in the heading entitled ``37 
CFR 1.492 National State Fees'', ``State'' should read ``Stage''.


Sec. 1.20  [Corrected]

    2. On page 19226, in the third column, in Sec. 1.20 (g), in the 
first line, after the word ``original'' insert ``or''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           PDEPTH—A computer program for the geophysical interpretation of magnetic and gravity profiles through Fourier filtering, source-depth analysis, and forward modeling      

      January 10, 2018    

View Report

PDEPTH is an interactive, graphical computer program used to construct interpreted geological source models for observed potential-field geophysical profile data. The current version of PDEPTH has been adapted to the Windows platform from an earlier DOS-based version. The input total-field magnetic anomaly and vertical gravity anomaly profiles can be filtered to produce derivative products such as reduced-to-pole magnetic profiles, pseudogravity profiles, pseudomagnetic profiles, and upward-or-downward-continued profiles. A variety of source-location methods can be applied to the original and filtered profiles to estimate (and display on a cross section) the locations and physical properties of contacts, sheet edges, horizontal line sources, point sources, and interface surfaces. Two-and-a-half-dimensional source bodies having polygonal cross sections can be constructed using a mouse and keyboard. These bodies can then be adjusted until the calculated gravity and magnetic fields of the source bodies are close to the observed profiles. Auxiliary information such as the topographic surface, bathymetric surface, seismic basement, and geologic contact locations can be displayed on the cross section using optional input files. Test data files, used to demonstrate the source location methods in the report, and several utility programs are included.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeffrey Phillips

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

jeff@usgs.gov

303-236-1206

## Related Content

#### Jeffrey Phillips

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

jeff@usgs.gov

303-236-1206

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200

### Explore Search

                  - Information Systems
                  - Methods and Analyses
                  - Science Technology

View All **
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00858-CV

M. Z. and R. B., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 

NO. 13-1310, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellants M. Z. and R. B. filed their notices of appeal on December 20, 2013 

and December 23, 2013, respectively. The appellate record was complete January 17, 2014, 

making appellants’ briefs due February 6, 2014. On January 30, 2013, counsel for R. B. filed a 

motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition 

of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) 

(providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this 

Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order 

Erick A. Bovik and Robert Galvin to file appellants’ briefs no later than March 11, 2014. If the 

briefs are not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why they should not be 

held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on February 5, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

32041

Vol. 63, No. 112

Thursday, June 11, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation

7 CFR Part 1485

Agreements for Development of

Foreign Markets for Agricultural

Commodities

Correction

In rule document 98–14522,

beginning on page 29938, in the issue of

Tuesday, June 2, 1998, make the

following corrections:

§ 1485.11 [Corrected]

1. On page 29940, in the second

column, under Subpart B–Market

Access Program, the section heading,

‘‘§ 1485 Definitions.’’ should read

‘‘§ 1485.11 Definitions.’’.

2. On the same page in the same

column, in § 1485.11, in the definition

of ‘‘Credit memo’’, in the second line,

‘‘owned’’ should read ‘‘owed’’.

§ 1485.16 [Corrected]

3. On page 29940 in the third column,

in § 1485.16(b), the paragraph

designation ‘‘(b)’’ should read ‘‘(6)’’.

4. On the same page, in the same

column, in § 1485.16(b)(11), in the

fourth line, after ‘‘plan’’ add ‘‘year’’.

And in the eighth line, remove ‘‘;and’’

and insert a period.

5. On the same page, in the same

column, in § 1485.16(c)(8), in the ninth

line, ‘‘its’’ should read ‘‘it’’.

§ 1485.21 [Corrected]

6. On page 29941, in the first column,

in § 1485.21, in the seventh line,

‘‘directed’’ should read ‘‘indicated’’.

7. On the same page, in the same

column, in § 1485.21, in the ninth line,

‘‘participants’’ should read

‘‘participant’’. And after ‘‘pay’’ add ‘‘to’’.

8. On the same page, in the same

column, in the signature line,

‘‘Adminstrator’’ should read

‘‘Administrator’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collections being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

Correction

In notice document 98–14690

appearing on page 30223, in the issue of

Wednesday, June 3, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 30223, in the first column,

under the DATES heading, in the third

line, ‘‘[insert date 60 days from

publication in Federal Register]’’ should

read ‘‘August 3, 1998’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CGFD28 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 30, 2023

Laurel M Isicoff

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−23995−LMI

Chapter: 7

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Perfection Body Shop and Paint, Inc

10764 SW 188 St

Miami, FL 33157

EIN: 47−3292745

FINAL DECREE

The trustee, Drew M Dillworth, having filed a final report that the estate has been fully administered, is

discharged and the case is closed.

Case 20-23995-LMI Doc 40 Filed 09/30/23 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Vs30 and spectral response from collocated shallow, active- and passive-source Vs data at 27 sites in Puerto Rico      

      October 1, 2013    

Shear‐wave velocity (VS) and time‐averaged shear‐wave velocity to 30 m depth (VS30) are the key parameters used in seismic site response modeling and earthquake engineering design. Where VS data are limited, available data are often used to develop and refine map‐based proxy models of VS30 for predicting ground‐motion intensities. In this paper, we present shallow VS data from 27 sites in Puerto Rico. These data were acquired using a multimethod acquisition approach consisting of noninvasive, collocated, active‐source body‐wave (refraction/reflection), active‐source surface wave at nine sites, and passive‐source surface‐wave refraction microtremor (ReMi) techniques. VS‐versus‐depth models are constructed and used to calculate spectral response plots for each site. Factors affecting method reliability are analyzed with respect to site‐specific differences in bedrock VS and spectral response. At many but not all sites, body‐ and surface‐wave methods generally determine similar depths to bedrock, and it is the difference in bedrock VS that influences site amplification. The predicted resonant frequencies for the majority of the sites are observed to be within a relatively narrow bandwidth of 1–3.5 Hz. For a first‐order comparison of peak frequency position, predictive spectral response plots from eight sites are plotted along with seismograph instrument spectra derived from the time series of the 16 May 2010 Puerto Rico earthquake. We show how a multimethod acquisition approach using collocated arrays compliments and corroborates VS results, thus adding confidence that reliable site characterization information has been obtained.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William J Stephenson

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wstephens@usgs.gov

303-273-8573

## Related Content

#### William J Stephenson

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wstephens@usgs.gov

303-273-8573

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Earthquakes | Los terremotos
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Puerto Rico

View All **
STEPHEN LEWIS FURNEY, III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-6069

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 17, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

Stephen Lewis Furney, III, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Wesley Paxson III, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
ACCEPTED 12-14-00087-cr TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/20/2015 10:36:17 AM

CATHY LUSK CLERK
Case 20-10367-PGH Doc 95 Filed 11/29/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-10367-PGH Doc 95 Filed 11/29/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-10367-PGH Doc 95 Filed 11/29/22 Page 3 of 3