alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

133294 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. RICK BEAVERS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 133294 COA: 269007 Wayne CC: 03-309389-NO BARTON MALOW COMPANY, JOMAR BUILDING COMPANY, INC., SPILLIS CARDELLA, DMJM, a/k/a DMJA, INC., and ROBERT SMITH, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argumen t, the parties shall address whether, in light of MCR 7.205(F)(3), the following cases were properly decided: Riza v Niagara Machine & Tool
Works, Inc , 411 Mich 915 (1980); and People v Kincade (On Remand) , 206 Mich App 477 (1994). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

s0710 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 13, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 112 (Monday, June 12, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 30923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50612]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceainc and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 625

[Docket No. 950206038-5038-01; I.D. 051595E]


Summer Flounder Fishery; Adjustments to 1995 State Quotas

Correction

    In rule document 95-12935 beginning on page 27906 in the issue of 
Friday, May 26, 1995, make the following corrections:
    On page 27907, in the table, in the seventh column, the third entry 
should read ``446,446''; and in the sixth column, in the fourth line, 
``6,446'' should be removed.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
                         OF QUICK-MED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(a)  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 of
     the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(b)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 13, 2004

/s/ DAVID LERNER
David S.  Lerner
President (and Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ NAM H. NGUYEN
Nam H. Nguyen
Chief Financial Officer
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

PHUONG MIMI NGUYEN,

Debtor.

/

Case No. 20-15954-RAM

Chapter 13

MELANIE ADAMS, individually and on behalf of 

her minor daughter, TAYLOR ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PHUONG MIMI NGUYEN,

Defendant.

/

Adv. Case No. 20-01350-RAM

DEFENDANT’S WITNESS LIST 

Defendant, PHUONG MIMI NGUYEN, by and through undersigned counsel, files

her Witness and Exhibit List pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Trial and Pretrial 

Deadlines [DE 25] and states as follows: 

WITNESSES

PHUONG MIMI NGUYEN

c/o Ricardo Rodriguez, Esquire

Phuong Mimi Nguyen testimony would negate, oppose and/or contradict the allegations 

in the complaint.

Alejandro Farinas

New Concept CT Corp.

Case 20-01350-RAM Doc 30 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Impeachment and Rebuttal Witnesses.

All those witnesses listed in Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosure and amended Disclosures.

###

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL 

RULE 9011-4(B)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to

the Bar of the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida and I 

am in compliance with the additional

qualifications to practice in this Court set

forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Rodriguez Law, P.L.

Counsel for the Debtor

900 West 49 Street, Suite 505

Hialeah, FL 33012

Telephone: 305-262-8226

Facsimile: 305-262-8229

/s/ Ricardo A Rodriguez

Ricardo A Rodriguez, Esq., FBN 0496901

Case 20-01350-RAM Doc 30 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO. 20-12738-RAM

Luis Perez Hernandez

 

CHAPTER 13

________Debtor(s)__________/

 DEBTOR’S EXPEDITED MOTION TO CONTINUE THE AUTOMATIC STAY 

(Requesting expedited hearing date to be scheduled before the expiration of 30 days from 

the date of filing the petition which is March 29, 2020.)

COMES NOW, the Debtor, Luis Perez Hernandez, by and through the undersigned 

attorney, and hereby files this Motion to Continue and Extend the Automatic Stay, Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. 362(c)(3)(B) and (C), as to all creditors of the Debtor and for the full length of this 

instant bankruptcy, and as grounds therefore alleges:

1. On August 18, 2015 the Debtor filed a Chapter 13 petition for bankruptcy relief in the 

Southern District of Florida, Miami Division (Case No.: 15-24948-LMI; herein the 

“2015 Case”).

2. The 2015 Case was dismissed for failure to become current with payments by March 

18, 2019 and said case was closed on April 23, 2019.

3. This instant case was filed on February 28, 2020.

4. In the 2015 Case, the Debtor was working, but due to personal health problems, the 

Debtor could not work any longer and retired. 

5. In the instant case, the Debtor’s change in circumstances is that he is now receiving 

support from his girlfriend who works full-time as stated in the Debtor’s Schedule I. 

6. The Debtor seeks to cure the arrears and maintain payments on the first mortgage of 

the Debtor’s principal residence. 

Case 20-12738-RAM Doc 13 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 2
7. The Debtor had only one prior bankruptcy in the last year wherein he made a 

substantial amount of payments over almost four years. 

8. The Debtor is not attempting to abuse the system by filing a second case.

9. The Debtor is now able to make the required chapter 13 payments.

10. The Debtor has filed the instant case in good faith in an effort to save his home.

11. There was no Motion to Lift the Automatic Stay filed in the previous case by any of 

the Debtor’s creditors.

12. This motion is made in good faith as to all creditors and only as a precautionary 

action to safeguard the rights the Debtor has with the stay provided by the Code.

WHEREFORE, the Debtor requests that the Court allow the automatic stay to continue as to 

all creditors for the full length of this instant bankruptcy together with any other relief the Court 

deems appropriate under the facts.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Continue the 

Automatic Stay was sent to all interested parties on the attached service list on March 9, 2020.

Respectfully Submitted,

Robert Sanchez & Associates, P.A.

355 West 49TH Street

Hialeah, Florida 33012

(305) 687-8008

/s/ Robert Sanchez, Esq._____

Robert Sanchez, Esq.

FBN: 0442161

Case 20-12738-RAM Doc 13 Filed 03/09/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Surficial horizontal displacements on Slumgullion landslide, Hinsdale County, Colorado, 1985 to 1990 (determined by direct visual comparison)      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Slumgullion landslide
                  - Colorado

View All **
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
EM ILE JOHN GARCIA AND KIMBERLY GARCIA , A ppellant s,

v. Case No

. 5D 21

- 3117 LT Cas e No. 2018- CA

- 305

BETH PITTMA N AN D TOWER HILL SELE CT INSURANCE COMPANY ,

Appellee s. ________________________________/
Decision filed J anuary 17 , 20 23 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citru s County , Carol A. Falvey , J udge.
Dimitrios A . Peteves and B ryan S. Gowdy , of Creed & Gowdy, P. A., Jacksonville, and J. Daniel Clark, of Clar k & Martino, P. A. , Tampa , for Appellant s. Daniel S. W einger, Anthony J. Petrillo, a nd Jeffrey B enson , o f L uks, Santaniello, P etrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend, Tampa , for Appellee , Beth P it tman.
No Appearance for Appellee, Tower Hill S elect I nsurance C ompany.2 P ER CURIAM.
A FFIRMED.

LAM BERT, C.J., EVANDER and JAY , JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41240

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL CALZADIAS, also known as Robert Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-217 

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul

Calzadias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Calzadias has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
June 11 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AJAH MARIE FOSTER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 01068

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_____________ ___________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment adjudicating guilt AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<page>                                        EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  November 14, 2003      /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74115-74116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29214]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities will hold three 
meetings of the Humanities Panel, a federal advisory committee, during 
January, 2015. The purpose of the meetings is for panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation of applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
Humanities Act of 1965.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for meeting dates.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at The John W. Kluge Center at the 
Library of Congress, 101 Independence Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20540-
4860.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, 400 7th Street SW., Room 4060, Washington, DC 20506; (202)606-
8322; evoyatzis@neh.gov. Hearing-impaired individuals who prefer to 
contact us by phone may use NEH's TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the 
following meetings:

1. DATE: January 27, 2015
    TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the division of Research Programs.
2. DATE: January 28, 2015
    TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the division of Research Programs.
3. DATE: January 29, 2015
    TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

[[Page 74116]]

    This meeting will discuss applications for Kluge Fellowships, 
submitted to the division of Research Programs.

Because these meetings will include review of personal and/or 
proprietary financial and commercial information given in confidence 
to the agency by grant applicants, the meetings will be closed to 
the public pursuant to sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6) of Title 
5, U.S.C., as amended. I have made this determination pursuant to 
the authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority 
to Close Advisory Committee Meetings dated July 19, 1993.

    Dated: December 9, 2014.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-29214 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Submarine landslide as the source for the October 11, 1918 Mona Passage tsunami: Observations and modeling      

      December 31, 2008    

The October 11, 1918 ML 7.5 earthquake in the Mona Passage between Hispaniolaand Puerto Rico generated a local tsunami that claimed approximately 100 livesalong the western coast of Puerto Rico. The area affected by this tsunami isnow significantly more populated. Newly acquired high-resolution bathymetryand seismic reflection lines in the Mona Passage show a fresh submarine landslide15 km northwest of Rinćon in northwestern Puerto Rico and in the vicinity ofthe first published earthquake epicenter. The landslide area is approximately76 km2 and probably displaced a total volume of 10 km3. The landslide's headscarpis at a water depth of 1200 m, with the debris flow extending to a water depthof 4200 m.

Submarine telegraph cables were reported cut by a landslide in this areafollowing the earthquake, further suggesting that the landslide was the resultof the October 11, 1918 earthquake. On the other hand, the location of thepreviously suggested source of the 1918 tsunami, a normal fault along the eastwall of Mona Rift, does not show recent seafloor rupture. Using the extended,weakly non-linear hydrodynamic equations implemented in the program COULWAVE,we modeled the tsunami as generated by a landslide with a duration of 325 s(corresponding to an average speed of ~ 27 m/s) and with the observed dimensionsand location. Calculated marigrams show a leading depression wave followed by amaximum positive amplitude in agreement with the reported polarity, relativeamplitudes, and arrival times.

Our results suggest this newly-identified landslide, which was likely triggeredby the 1918 earthquake, was the primary cause of the October 11, 1918 tsunamiand not the earthquake itself. Results from this study should be useful to helpdiscern poorly constrained tsunami sources in other case studies.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Uri ten Brink, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

utenbrink@usgs.gov

508-457-2396

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

## Related Content

#### Uri ten Brink, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

utenbrink@usgs.gov

508-457-2396

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Earthquakes | Los terremotos
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Mona Passage
                  - Puerto Rico

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4903 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4903

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service to target 
citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under 
     the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2016

  Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service to target 
citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under 
     the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TARGETING BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 
              BASED ON THE EXERCISE OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

    None of the funds made available under any Act may be used by the 
Internal Revenue Service to target citizens of the United States for 
exercising any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4840 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the maximum 

wages allowed under the work opportunity tax credit for ex-felons, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2016 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN (for herself, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. RANGEL, and 

Mr. PAYNE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the maximum wages allowed under the work opportunity 

tax credit for ex-felons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire For a Second 

5 Chance Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF WORK OPPOR7 TUNITY TAX CREDIT. 

8 (a) CREDIT MADE PERMANENT.—Section 51(c) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4840 IH

1 paragraph (4) and redesignating paragraph (5) as para2 graph (4). 

3 (b) INCREASE IN WAGE LIMITATION FOR EX-FEL4 ONS.— 

5 (1) LIMITATION ON WAGES TAKEN INTO AC6 COUNT.—Section 51(b)(3) of such Code is amend7 ed— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘subsection (d)(3)(A)(iv), 

9 and’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)(3)(A)(iv),’’, 

10 and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘subsection 

12 (d)(3)(A)(ii)(II))’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

13 (d)(3)(A)(ii)(II), and $14,000 in the case of 

14 any individual who is an ex-felon by reason of 

15 subsection (d)(4))’’. 

16 (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 51(b) of 

17 such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol18 lowing: 

19 ‘‘(4) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—In the 

20 case of any taxable year beginning after 2016, the 

21 $14,000 dollar amount contained in paragraph (3) 

22 relating to ex-felons shall be increased by an amount 

23 equal to the product of— 

24 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4840 IH

1 ‘‘(B) the cost of living adjustment deter2 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

3 year in which the taxable year begins deter4 mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2015’ for 

5 ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 

6 thereof. 

7 If any increase determined under the preceding sen8 tence is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall 

9 be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.’’. 

10 (c) QUALIFIED EX-FELON.—Section 51(d)(4)(B) of 

11 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘3 years’’. 

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

15 the employer after December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS