alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.11


 


First
AMENDMENT TO Promissory note


 


THIS
FIRST Amendment (THE
“FIRST AMENDMENT”) DATED July 20, 2017, shall amend the Promissory note
(THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF OCTOBER 27, 2015 AMONG NON-INVASIVE
MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE “MAKER”) AND JANE HSIAO (THE “PAYEE”)
AS NOTED BELOW.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on October 27, 2015;
and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this First Amendment and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1.
Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The
principal amount of the loan evidenced hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees
and expenses accrued, shall be due and payable on July 31, 2018 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2.
Governing Law. This First Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of
laws rules or principles.


 


3.
Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4.
Entire Agreement. This First Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof and supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 


5.
Interpretation. Any capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided
in the Note.


 


6.
Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile
by the Parties, in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective
when a counterpart hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 




    	 	 	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this First Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 20th day of July,
2017.


 


	 	 	NON-INVASIVE
    MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/
    James J. Martin 
	 	 	Name:	James
    J. Martin
	 	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/ Jane Hsiao	 	 	 
	Name:	Jane
    Hsiao, Ph.D.	 	 


 




    	 	 -2-
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Theses 

#           Vertical tritium transport from the shallow unsaturated zone to the atmosphere, Amargosa Desert Research Site, Nevada      

      January 1, 2007    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Nevada Water Science Center          

2730 N. Deer Run RoadSuite 3Carson City, NV89701United States

(775) 887-7600

(775) 887-7629

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - armagosa desert research site
                  - nevada

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The weight of cities: Urbanization effects on Earth’s subsurface      

      January 14, 2021    

Across the world, people increasingly choose to live in cities. By 2050, 70% of Earth's population will live in large urban areas. Upon considering a large city, questions arise such as, how much does that weigh? What are its effects on the landscape? Does it cause measurable subsidence? Here I calculate the weight of San Francisco Bay region urbanization, where 7.75 million people live at, or near the coast. It is difficult to account for everything that is in a city. I assume that most of the weight is buildings and their contents, which allows the use of base outline and height data to approximate their mass, which is cumulatively 1.6·1012 kg. I build a series of finite element models to study effects of pressure exerted by the weight distribution. Within the elastic realm, I look at compression, flexure, isostatic compensation, stress change, dilatation, and fluid flow changes. Within the nonlinear realm I show example calculations of primary and secondary settlement of soils under load. The combined modeled subsidence from building loads is at least 5–80 mm, with the largest contributions coming from nonlinear settlement and creep in soils. A general result is closing of pore space and redirection of pore fluids. While the calculated subsidence of the Bay Area is relatively small compared with other sources of elevation change such as pumping and recharge of aquifers, all sources of subsidence are concerning given an expected 200–300 mm sea level rise at San Francisco by the year 2050.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Tom Parsons

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

tparsons@usgs.gov

650-439-2374

## Related Content

#### Tom Parsons

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

tparsons@usgs.gov

650-439-2374

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

### Explore Search

                  - Geology

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Tsunami geology in paleoseismology      

      January 1, 2015    

The 2004 Indian Ocean and 2011 Tohoku-oki disasters dramatically demonstrated the destructiveness and deadliness of tsunamis. For the assessment of future risk posed by tsunamis it is necessary to understand past tsunami events. Recent work on tsunami deposits has provided new information on paleotsunami events, including their recurrence interval and the size of the tsunamis (e.g. [187–189]). Tsunamis are observed not only on the margin of oceans but also in lakes. The majority of tsunamis are generated by earthquakes, but other events that displace water such as landslides and volcanic eruptions can also generate tsunamis. These non-earthquake tsunamis occur less frequently than earthquake tsunamis; it is, therefore, very important to find and study geologic evidence for past eruption and submarine landslide triggered tsunami events, as their rare occurrence may lead to risks being underestimated. Geologic investigations of tsunamis have historically relied on earthquake geology. Geophysicists estimate the parameters of vertical coseismic displacement that tsunami modelers use as a tsunami's initial condition. The modelers then let the simulated tsunami run ashore. This approach suffers from the relationship between the earthquake and seafloor displacement, the pertinent parameter in tsunami generation, being equivocal. In recent years, geologic investigations of tsunamis have added sedimentology and micropaleontology, which focus on identifying and interpreting depositional and erosional features of tsunamis. For example, coastal sediment may contain deposits that provide important information on past tsunami events [190, 191]. In some cases, a tsunami is recorded by a single sand layer. Elsewhere, tsunami deposits can consist of complex layers of mud, sand, and boulders, containing abundant stratigraphic evidence for sediment reworking and redeposition. These onshore sediments are geologic evidence for tsunamis and are called ‘tsunami deposits’ (Figs. 26 and 27). Tsunami deposits can be classified into two groups: modern tsunami deposits and paleotsunami deposits. A modern tsunami deposit is a deposit whose source event is known. A paleotsunami deposit is a deposit whose age is estimated and has a source that is either inferred to be a historical event or is unknown. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Bruce Jaffe (Former Employee)          

##### Research Oceanographer

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

## Related Content

####             Bruce Jaffe (Former Employee)          

##### Research Oceanographer

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 1532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 4, 6, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19, 32, 41, 43, 49, 52, and 53

[FAC 97-03; FAR Case 97-772; Item IV]
RIN 9000-AH24


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Reorganization of FAR Part 13, 
Simplified Acquisition Procedures

Correction

    In rule document 97-31817, beginning on page 64916, in the issue of 
Tuesday, December 9, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 64917, in the second column, in the designated paragraph 
1, in the second line, ``6'' should read ``16''.


53.213  [Corrected]

    2. On page 64929, in the table, in the Location column, in the 
third entry line, ``3.213(c)'' should read ``53.213(c)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,498
<PP&E>                                          14,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          786,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,616
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,553,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,886
<SALES>                                        147,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,067
<CGS>                                           64,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (113,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,056)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.010)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Vault America, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company"), hereby certifies that:



To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended October 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  December 21, 2010



BY:  /s/ Harold F. Schultz

HAROLD F. SCHULTZ

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFER
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the undersigned officer of Syscan Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                               /s/ William Hawkins
Date:  May 16, 2005
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               William Hawkins, Acting Chief Financial Officer,
                               Chief Operating Officer and Secretary


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Exhibit  23.1

                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO:  Jackson  Rivers  Company

As  independent  certified  public  accountants,  we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-KSB under the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 of Jackson Rivers Company for the year ended
December  31,  2002  of  our report dated February 15, 2003 and contained in the
Registration  Statement No. 333-108120 of Jackson Rivers Company Form  S-8 under
the  Securities  Act  of  1933  insofar as such report relates  to the financial
statements  of  Jackson  Rivers  Company  for  the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                /s/  Michaelson & Company, P.A.
                                -------------------------------
                                     Michaelson & Company, P.A.


West Palm Beach, Florida
April 13, 2004


<PAGE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00257-CV

IN RE Richard THOMAS, Thomas Family Property Company, Ltd., 

Michael Thomas, and William Thomas

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 15, 2014, relators Richard Thomas, Thomas Family Property Company, Ltd., 

Michael Thomas and William Thomas filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency temporary stay of the jury trial set in the underlying proceeding pending a ruling on 

the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus and the motion for emergency temporary stay are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-PC-0613, styled In re Estate of Margaret E. Thomas, Deceased and 

Robert E. Thomas v. Richard W. Thomas, Individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of Margaret E. 

Thomas, and as Trustee of the Robert E. Thomas Children's Family Trust, and as Trustee of the Pamela T. Sheet’s 

Thomas Children’s Trust, and as Trustee of the Thomas Grandchildren’s Trust; and Thomas Family Property 

Company, Ltd., pending in the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer 

presiding.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 19394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10421]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 19394]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Use of Certified Forage to Prevent the Spread of Noxious Weeds on 
National Forest System Lands in Montana

Correction

    In notice document 97-7754 appearing on page 14668 in the issue of 
Thursday, March 27, 1997 make the following correction:
    In the first column, under DATES ``March 26, 1997'' should read 
``May 27, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit
  10.2

Report
    of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Board of Directors
    of Credit Suisse Group, ZurichUnder
                              date of March 23, 2006, we reported on the consolidated
                              balance sheets of Credit Suisse Group and subsidiaries
                              (the "Group") as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
                              the related consolidated statements of income, changes
                              in shareholders’equity, and cash flows for
                              each of the years in the three-year period ended
                              December 31, 2005, which are included in the Group's
                              Annual Report on Form 20-F. In connection with our
                              audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial
                              statements, we also audited the related consolidated
                              financial statement schedules I, III and IV (the "financial
                              statement schedules"), included in the Group's Annual
                              Report 2005 and which are incorporated herein by
                              reference. These financial statement schedules are
                              the responsibility of management. Our responsibility
                              is to express an opinion on these financial statement
                            schedules based on our audits.In
                              our opinion, such financial statement schedules,
                              when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
                              financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly,
                              in all material respects, the information set forth
                            therein.As
                            discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial
                            statements, in 2005 the Group changed its method of
                            accounting for share-based compensation, in 2004 the
                            Group changed its method of accounting for certain
                            variable interest entities and in 2003 the Group changed
                            its methods of accounting for certain nontraditional
                            long-duration contracts and separate accounts, variable
                          interest entities and share-based compensation.KPMG
                          Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler SADavid
                            L. Jahnke 
    Certified Public Accountant 
  Auditor in Charge

Roland
    Müller 
  Certified AccountantZurich,
  Switzerland March 30, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Nova Biogenetics, Inc. hereby certifies, to the best
of his knowledge that:

         1. The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for
         the annual period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: December 12, 2005                 /s/ Bradley Smith
                                        ------------------
                                        Bradley Smith
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Dynamics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
A. Waldorf, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ronald A. Waldorf
-------------------------------------------------
Ronald A. Waldorf,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

July 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3667 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3667

 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2012

  Ms. Mikulski (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA.

    The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Special Rules for Certain 
Married Individuals'' and inserting ``Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal 
IRA''.
                                 <all>
```