alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50131]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 
Commissioner

24 CFR Part 3500

[Docket No. R-95-1538; FR-2942-C-06]

RIN 2502-AG27


Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Section 6 Transfer of 
Servicing of Mortgage Loans (Regulation X); Correction

Correction

    In rule document 95-553 beginning on page 2642 in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 10, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 2642, in the third column, in amendatory instruction 2, the 
first three lines should read as follows:
    ``2. The text on page 65455 is removed, and in addition in Appendix 
MS-1 to Part 3500, Servicing Disclosure Statement, is further corrected 
by''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 



 
 AMARIN CORPORATION plc 2011 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

AWARD AGREEMENT 
 This
AWARD AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into and made effective as of [                    ], 20    
between Amarin Corporation plc (the “Company”), and [                    ] (“Optionee”). Capitalized terms used and
not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Amarin Corporation plc 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
  

	1.	Number of Incentive Stock Options (“Options”):
[                    ] 

  

					
	2.	 	Per Share Purchase Price: $[                    
	 	(provided that such Per Share Purchase Price shall not be less than the par value of the Share at any time, currently £0.50)

  

	3.	Grant Date: [                    ]


  

	4.	Date Options Become Exercisable (Vesting): 

  

					
	 Number of Ordinary Shares
	  	Exercise Dates	 
	
[                    ]
	  	 	[                    	] 
	
[                    ]
	  	 	[                    	] 
	
[                    ]
	  	 	[                    	] 
	
[                    ]
	  	 	[                    	] 

  

	5.	Expiration Date: [                    ]


  

	6.	Terms of this Award Agreement: In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Award Agreement and the Plan, except in relation to paragraph 7 below,
the provisions of the Plan shall prevail. A copy of the Plan is provided herewith. 

  

	7.	Non-transferable: These Options shall not be transferable by the Optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and the Options shall be
exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee. 

 By signing this Award Agreement, you
agree to all of the terms and conditions described herein and in the Plan. 
  

											
		 	AMARIN CORPORATION plc	 	OPTIONEE
						
		 	By:	 	  
	 		 	Signature:	 	  

		 	Name:	 		 		 	Name:	 	[                    ]
		 	Title:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 19-24331-BKC-PGH

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR.

XXX-XX-6171

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF CONTINUED CONFIRMATION HEARING

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Confirmation Hearing has been continued to 

April 06, 2020 at 9:00 AM at the United States Federal Bankruptcy Courthouse, 299 East Broward 

Boulevard, Room 301, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE the Court may dismiss the above-referenced case for failure to propose a 

confirmable plan or for any other reason deemed necessary by the Court without further notice.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this 

Court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Continued 

Confirmation Hearing was served, via U.S. first class mail, certified mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties 

listed on the attached service list this 10th day of March, 2020.

DEBTOR

_____________________________________ /s/ Robin R. Weiner

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

TELEPHONE: 954-382-2001

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 861154

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 57 Filed 03/10/20 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF CONTINUED CONFIRMATION HEARING

CASE NO.: 19-24331-BKC-PGH

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR.

561 SW 60 AVE.

PLANTATION, FL 33317

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

MICHAEL H. JOHNSON, ESQUIRE

3601 WEST COMMERICAL BLVD

SUITE 31

FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33309

MICHAEL H. JOHNSON, ESQUIRE IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAIL A CONFORMED COPY OF 

THIS NOTICE TO ALL CREDITORS AND INTERESTED PARTIES IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT 

THEREOF.

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 57 Filed 03/10/20 Page 2 of 2
r--6--6f 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0562

KILA SHEPHERD.

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Jack Connors, whose name appears next on the list of 

attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this October 19, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: John C. Doubek, Sarah Marie Mazanec, Jack Connors

10/19/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0562
## SERVE D JUL Y 14,201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F ORIGINA LPRODUCTIONS , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10AL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-062 1 1 'il l I'ji' i

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designateda s Cas e No . 2009AL700099 ) ha s bee nassigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o nth e attache dServic e List .

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t Ronnie A . Y Q

Chie f Administr aFA A Docke t No . CP10AL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Charle s M . Finkel , Respondent' s Counse l Magafta , Cathcart

& McCarth y 180 1 Avenu e o f

th e Stars , Suit e 60 0 Lo s Angeles , C A 9006 7 TEL : 310-553-663 0 FAX : 310-407-229 5 Lierr e Green , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP-7. 6 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n P.O . Bo x 92000 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 9200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 7 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloo r RoomE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 20 2 366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i nperso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States, part 13. Snake River basin      

      January 1, 1963    

View Document

View Plate 1

View Plate 2

View Plate 3

View Plate 4

View Plate 5

The magnitude of a flood of any selected frequency up to 50 years for any site on any stream in the Snake River basin can be determined by methods outlined in this report, with some limitations. The methods are not applicable for regulated streams, for drainage basins smaller than 10 or larger than 5,000 square miles, for streams fed by large springs, or for streams that have flow characteristics materially different from the regional pattern. The magnitude of a flood for a selected frequency at a given site is determined by using the appropriate composite frequency curve and the mean annual flood for the given site. The mean annual flood is computed from either a formula or a nomograph in which drainage area, mean annual precipitation, and a geographic factor are used as independent variables. The standard error of estimate for the computation of mean annual floods is plus 17 percent and minus 15 percent.

Nine flood-frequency regions (A-I) are defined. In all except regions B and I, frequency relations vary with the mean altitude of the basin as well as with the geographic location; therefore, families of curves are required for 7 of the 9 flood-frequency regions.

The report includes a brief description of the physiography and climate of the Snake River basin to explain the reason for the large variation in mean annual floods, which range from zero to about 27 cubic feet per second per square mile.

Composite frequency curves and formulas for computing mean annual floods are based on all suitable flood data collected in the Snake River basin. Tables show the data used to derive the formula. Following the analysis of data are station descriptions and lists of peak stages and discharges for 295 gaging stations at which 5 or more years of annual flood records were collected pr'or to Sept. 30, 1957. Many flood peak data are not usable in defining the frequency curves and deriving the formula because of large diversions and regulation upstream from the gaging stations. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Snake River Basin
                  - Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Utah
                  -  Washington
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modular compositional learning improves 1D hydrodynamic lake model performance by merging process-based modeling with deep learning      

      December 28, 2023    

Hybrid Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning (KGML) models, which are deep learning models that utilize scientific theory and process-based model simulations, have shown improved performance over their process-based counterparts for the simulation of water temperature and hydrodynamics. We highlight the modular compositional learning (MCL) methodology as a novel design choice for the development of hybrid KGML models in which the model is decomposed into modular sub-components that can be process-based models and/or deep learning models. We develop a hybrid MCL model that integrates a deep learning model into a modularized, process-based model. To achieve this, we first train individual deep learning models with the output of the process-based models. In a second step, we fine-tune one deep learning model with observed field data. In this study, we replaced process-based calculations of vertical diffusive transport with deep learning. Finally, this fine-tuned deep learning model is integrated into the process-based model, creating the hybrid MCL model with improved overall projections for water temperature dynamics compared to the original process-based model. We further compare the performance of the hybrid MCL model with the process-based model and two alternative deep learning models and highlight how the hybrid MCL model has the best performance for projecting water temperature, Schmidt stability, buoyancy frequency, and depths of different isotherms. Modular compositional learning can be applied to existing modularized, process-based model structures to make the projections more robust and improve model performance by letting deep learning estimate uncertain process calculations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael F Meyer, PhD

##### Research Geographer

Water Resources Mission Area

mfmeyer@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Michael F Meyer, PhD

##### Research Geographer

Water Resources Mission Area

mfmeyer@usgs.gov

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States
Case 20-21071-LMI Doc 51 Filed 02/25/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 20-21071-LMI Doc 51 Filed 02/25/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 20-21071-LMI Doc 51 Filed 02/25/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 20-21071-LMI Doc 51 Filed 02/25/21 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

(Section 302 Certification)

I, Thomas E. Vessey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of 1st Centennial Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves Management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2006                
|                                     
|/s/ Thomas E. Vessey                 
|Thomas E. Vessey,                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           The roles of flow acceleration and deceleration in sediment suspension in the surf zone      

      June 11, 2019    

Prediction of sediment suspension in the surf zone remains elusive. We explore how suspended sediment concentration at 19 cm above the bed in the mid-surf zone during a storm is influenced by flow acceleration and deceleration. There is a tendency for higher suspended sediment concentrations during onshore flow, with decelerating onshore flows having higher concentrations than steady, accelerating, or reversing flows. The development of models that exploit information on flow acceleration, deceleration, and flow reversal may lead to improved ability to predict suspended sediment transport in the surf zone and resulting geomorphic changes.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Bruce Jaffe (Former Employee)          

##### Research Oceanographer

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

#### SeanPaul La Selle

##### Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

slaselle@usgs.gov

831-460-7574

## Related Content

####             Bruce Jaffe (Former Employee)          

##### Research Oceanographer

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

#### SeanPaul La Selle

##### Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

slaselle@usgs.gov

831-460-7574

### Contact

####               Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

### Explore Search

                  - Coasts

View All **
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-19-00021- CV
Hi Tech Lu xury Im ports, LLC, Appellan t

v. Tow nsend L. Morgan, Jr., Appellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 345 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 8-0 0257 9, H ONO RAB LE DUSTIN M . H OW ELL, JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

On Marc h 6, 2019, we g rante d i n p ar t ap pellant’s emer g ency motion to stay all proce eding s in the district court belo w, t em p o rarily stay ed the proce eding s pending further order of this Court, and reque sted a response from appellee
. Having now rec eived and considere d that response , we lift the stay

order
. I t is ordere d April 1, 2019.

Be fore J ustices Goodwin, B aker , and Tria na
Case 20-20169-RAM Doc 62 Filed 04/06/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-20169-RAM Doc 62 Filed 04/06/21 Page 2 of 2
RETURN OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN District of Florida

J.R. WALLACE

Process Server

LEGAL PROCESS SERVICE & INVESTIGATIONS,

LLC

8724 SW 72nd Street

#402

Miami, FL 33173

(305) 412-1178

Our Job Serial Number: LIM-2020003967

Copyright © 1992-2021 Database Services, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V8.1t

Case Number: 20-14372-MAM; ADV

20-01142-MAM

IN RE::

ROBERT J. MOCKOVIAK and

 SANDRA H. MOCKOVIAK, DEBTORS

For:

Barry P. Gruher, Esq.

GENOVESE, JOBLOVE, ET AL.

200 East Broward Blvd

#1110

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Received by LEGAL PROCESS SERVICE & INVESTIGATIONS, LLC on the 30th day of December, 2020 at 2:31 pm

to be served on MEDTRONIC PLC, 710 MEDTRONIC PKWY, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432.

I, J.R. WALLACE, do hereby affirm that on the 4th day of January, 2021 at 3:30 pm, I:

served an AUTHORIZED entity by delivering a true copy of the SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, 

INFORMATION OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A BANKRUPTCY CASE (OR 

ADVERSARY PROCEEDING) with my initials; identification number; the date and hour of service endorsed thereon 

by me, to: CHRISTINA OLUND C/O CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY as LITIGATION MANAGEMENT 

REPRESENTATIVE FOR CSC at the address of: 2345 RICE STREET, SUITE 230, ST PAUL, MN 55113, who 

stated they are authorized to accept service for MEDTRONIC PLC, and informed said person of the contents therein, 

in compliance with state statutes.

I certify that I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am authorized to effect civil process in 

the jurisdiction where process was made. Under penalty of perjury, I declare the facts contained herein are true and 

correct.

Case 20-01142-MAM Doc 120 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10515]




BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Part 110

[Notice 1996-11]


Candidate Debates and News Stories

Correction

    In rule document 96-10038 beginning on page 18049, in the issue of 
Wednesday, April 24, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 18050, in the 1st column, in the 1st full paragraph, in 
the 12th line, ``express'' should read ``expressed''.


Sec. 110.13  [Corrected]

    2. On page 18051, in the third column, in Sec. 110.13 (a)(2), in 
the third line from the top, after the word ``are'' insert ``not''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D