alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Why the New Madrid earthquakes are M 7–8 and the Charleston earthquake is ∼M 7      

      December 1, 2014    

Estimates of magnitudes of large historical earthquakes are an essential input to and can seriously affect seismic‐hazard estimates. The earthquake‐intensity observations, modified Mercalli intensities (MMI), and assigned magnitudes Mof the 1811–1812 New Madrid events have been reinterpreted several times in the last decade and have been a source of controversy in making seismic‐hazard estimates in the central United States. Observations support the concept that the larger the earthquake, the greater the maximum‐felt distance. For the same crustal attenuation and local soil conditions, magnitude should be the main influence on intensity values at large distances. We apply this concept by comparing the mean MMI at distances of 600–1200 km for each of the four largest New Madrid 1811–1812 earthquakes, the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, the 1929 M 7.2 Grand Banks earthquake, and the 2001M 7.6 Bhuj, India, earthquake. We fit the intensity observations using the form MMI=A+C×dist−0.8×log(dist) to better define intensity attenuation in eastern North America (ENA). The intensity attenuation in cratonic India differs from ENA and is corrected to ENA using both the above estimate and published intensity relations. We evaluate source, marine geophysical, Q, and stress‐drop information, as well as a 1929 Milne–Shaw record at Chicago to confirm that the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake occurred in ENA crust. Our direct comparison of mean intensities beyond 600 km suggests M 7.5, 7.3, 7.7, and 6.9 for the three New Madrid 1811–1812 mainshocks and the largest aftershock and M 7.0 for the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, with an estimated uncertainty of 0.3 units at the 95% confidence level (based on a Monte Carlo analysis). Our mean New Madrid and Charleston mainshock magnitudes are similar to those of Bakun and Hopper (2004) and are much higher than those of Hough and Page (2011) for New Madrid.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Oliver S Boyd, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

olboyd@usgs.gov

303-273-8617

## Related Content

#### Oliver S Boyd, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

olboyd@usgs.gov

303-273-8617

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Ventiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Emery,
Chief Financial Officer of Ventiv, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Ventiv.
 
 /s/    JOHNR.
      EMERY**John
      R. Emery**
      **Chief
      Financial Officer**
 
 DATE:
March 31, 2005
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ventiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by Ventiv Health, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 REGION 4

 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER

 61 FORSYTH STREET

 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

March 12, 2015 

Sean Alteri, Director 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet 

500 Metro Street, 12 th Floor, 

Capital Plaza Tower Street 

Frankfort, Kentucky 40601-1957 

Dear Mr. Alteri: 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency’s FY 2014 Air Pollution Control grant 

authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your agency’s various grant commitments 

and their status. Since there were no issues, your report is now finalized. This letter documents the 

conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and 

identified as a commitment in your FY 2014 Air Planning Agreement under Cross Cutting Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2014 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to 

protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Stuart Perry at 

(404) 562-8980 or Shantel Shelmon at (404) 562-9817. 

 

 Sincerely, 

 Beverly H. Banister 

 Director 

 Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended  December 31, 2004 (the  "Report") by National
Coal Corp. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   to  the  best  of  our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   to the best of our  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in the  Report
     fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
     results of operations of Registrant.






Date:  March 30, 2005                             /S/ JON NIX
                                             -------------------------------

                                             Jon Nix
                                             President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer






Date:  March 30, 2005                             /S/ ROBERT CHMIEL
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Robert Chmiel
                                             Chief Financial Officer
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Alan KONZELMAN, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Eleanor Konzelman, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2018]

Ashley C. Parrish of King & Spalding, LLP, Washington, D.C., and William L. Durham II and Val Leppert of King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for appellant.

John S. Mills and Courtney Brewer of The Mills Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, and Eric S. Rosen of Kelley Uustal, PLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*135Appellant R.J. Reynolds raises several issues on appeal, and we affirm as to all of them. With regard to the applicable punitive damages statute, we agree with the First and Second District Courts of Appeal in holding that the pre-1999 version of section 768.73, Florida Statutes, applies in an *Engle* progeny personal injury suit that is converted into a wrongful death action upon the smoker's death. *See**R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Allen for Estate of Allen* , 228 So.3d 684, 689-90 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; *R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Evers* , 232 So.3d 457, 462-63 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; *see also**R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Buonomo* , 138 So.3d 1049, 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (noting that parties did not dispute applicability of pre-1999 version of punitive damages statute), *quashed on other grounds sub nom.* , 41 Fla. L. Weekly S113, 2016 WL 374082 (Jan. 26, 2016).

With regard to the issue raised on cross-appeal, we find that the trial court erred in reducing the compensatory award based on comparative fault. *See**Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.* , 232 So.3d 294, 305 (Fla. 2017). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the Florida Supreme Court's opinion.

*Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.*

Levine, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 477-4 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 477-4 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 47882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10911]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 176 / Thursday, September 11, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 47882]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 46

[FAR Case 96-009]
RIN 9000-AH61


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Contract Quality Requirements

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-17150 beginning on page 35901, in the 
issue of Wednesday, July 2, 1997, make the following correction:


46.202-4  [Corrected]

    On page 35901, in the third column, in section 46.202-4(b), in the 
11th line, ``ANSA/ASQC E4; ANSE/ASME'' should read ``ANSI/ASQC E4; 
ANSI/ASME''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Selected hydrologic data, Cache Valley, Utah and Idaho      

      January 1, 1970    

This report presents selected basic data from a study of the ground-water resources of Cache Valley, Utah and Idaho. The study was made during 1967-69 by the u.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights, and with the assistance of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service. Incorporated in this report are data collected by the Geological Survey and by other organizations since 1935. This report is intended to make the data conveniently available and to supplement an interpretive report which will be published separately.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Cache Valley
                  - Idaho
                  -  Utah

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  15,689
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                            (17,689)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        8,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (8,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (8,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (8,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.00)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-13622-BKC-RAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

JUAN JOSE PEREZ MIER

_____________________________/

AMENDED

ORDER CONTINUING CONFIRMATION HEARING AND MAKING ALL DEBTOR PAYMENTS 

NON-REFUNDABLE

THIS CASE came to be heard on June 16, 2020 upon the Confirmation Hearing of the Chapter 13 

Case, and based on the record, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

DEBTOR

1. The Confirmation Hearing is continued to July 21, 2020 at 1:35 pm by TELEPHONE. To

participate call, Court Solutions (917)746-7476. If a party is unable to register online 

(https://www.court-solutions.com), a reservation may also be made by telephone at (917) 

746-7476.

*Amended to reference telephonic hearing (Court Solutions)

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 25, 2020.

Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 31 Filed 06/26/20 Page 1 of 2
AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING CONFIRMATION HEARING AND MAKING ALL DEBTOR PAYMENTS NON-REFUNDABLE

CASE NO.: 20-13622-BKC-RAM

2. The Debtor is ordered to continue making payments each month to the Chapter 13 Trustee in 

accordance with the last filed Chapter 13 Plan. Failure to continue payments may result in the 

dismissal of this case.

3. As a condition for the continued confirmation hearing and delay of payments to creditors, all 

payments held by the Chapter 13 Trustee shall be non-refundable and held in trust for the secured 

creditors as adequate protection, and in trust for priority and administrative creditors.

If this case is dismissed or converted, the Trustee shall disburse all funds which were received 

prior to the order of conversion or dismissal and held in trust. The disbursement shall be on a pro 

rata basis, less Trustee fees, to the secured, priority or administrative creditors pursuant to the 

proposed Chapter 13 Plan which was filed at least one day prior to last confirmation hearing date.

4.

###

ORDER SUBMITTED BY:

NANCY K. NEIDICH

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

JUAN JOSE PEREZ MIER

97 E 47 STREET

HIALEAH, FL 33013

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

ROBERT SANCHEZ, ESQUIRE

355 W 49 STREET

HIALEAH, FL 33012

Case 20-13622-RAM Doc 31 Filed 06/26/20 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O SE PEREZ- G O N ZA LEZ, a . k . a . J o s e C. G on za l ez , a. k. a. Jose G on za l ez -P er ez , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73728 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 819- 589 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e P e r e z - G onz a l e z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen re m ov alproceedi ng s. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED MA R 18 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73728 2 d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 43 9 F . 3d 59 2, 60 3 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ) , an dwe d i s m i s s i n p artan dd e n yi n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the B I A ’ s di s c r e t i onaryde t e rm i na t i on tha tthe e v id e n c e P e r e z - G o n z a le z s ub m itte dw ith h is m o tio n to r e o p e n w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to w arr an t r e o p e n in g . Se e i d. at60 1 (i f “ the B IA det erm i nes thata m ot i on t o reopen proceedi ng s i n w hi ch there has a l re ady bee n an u nrevi ew abl e di sc re t i on ary d e te rm in a tio n c o n c e rn in g as ta tu to ryp r e r e q u is ite to r e lie f d o e s n o t m a k e o u t a pr i m af a c i e c a s e f

ortha tr e l i e f

, ” 8 U . S . C . § 1252( a ) ( 2) ( B ) ( i ) bar s thi s c ourtf r om r e v is itin g th e m e r its ) . To th e e x t e n tPe r e z - G o n z a l e z c o n t e n d s th a tth e BI A f a i l e dt o c o n s i d e rs o me o ra l l o f th e e v i d e n c e h e s ub mi tt e dw i th th e mo t i o n t o r e o p e n , h e h a s n o to v e r c o me th e p r e s u m p tio n th a t th e B I A d idr e v ie w th e r e c o r d . Se e i d. a t603. I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e do notr e a c h P e r e z - G onz a l e z ’ s r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.
Kirby Colyntheia WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3712

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 7, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

53878

Vol. 62, No. 200

Thursday, October 16, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention

Advisory Committee on Immunization

Practices: Meeting

Correction

In notice document 97–25834

beginning on page 51111 in the issue of

Tuesday, September 30, 1997 make the

following correction:

On page 51111, in the third column,

under the paragraph heading Purpose,

in the third line from the bottom delete

‘‘Page 2’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural

Items in the Possession of the

Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, MA

Correction

In notice document 97–26871

beginning on page 53022, in the issue of

Friday, October 10, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 53023, in the first column, in

the first full paragraph, in the 11th and

12th lines, ‘‘[thirty days following

publication in the Federal Register]’’

should read ‘‘November 10, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Airspace Docket No. 94-ASO-18]

RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Restricted Areas;

Camp Lejeune, NC

Correction

In final rule document 97–26671

beginning on page 52226 in the issue of

Tuesday, October 7, 1997 make the

following corrections:

§ 75.53 [Corrected]

(1) On page 52228, in the third

column, under the heading R-5304A

Camp Lejeune, NC [New], in the sixth

line ‘‘77°35′15′′W.;’’ should read

‘‘77°33′15′′W.;’’.

(2) On page 52229, in the first

column, in the first line ‘‘77°35′15′′W.;’’

should read ‘‘77°33′15′′W.;’’.

(3) On the same page, in the same

column, under the heading R-5304C

Camp Lejeune, NC [New], in the sixth

line ‘‘77°35′15′′W.;’’ should read

‘‘77°33′15′′W.;’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

**AMENDED**

RE: GERARDO ARIAS CASE NUMBER: 19-26046-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

(If this case is dismissed, this deficiency is an objection to reinstate)

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows. The debtor may be dismissed for 

failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. The Court may dismiss this case if no one 

appears at the confirmation hearing to represent the debtor. The Trustee reserves the right to raise 

additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and reviewed for issues raised 

and additional documents needed.

Debtor’s attorney must provide all written responses or documents through BKDOCS.COM by 5pm at least 15 

days prior to the confirmation hearing. Pro Se debtors may fax to 954-443-4452. Late documents may not be 

reviewed or considered, and this case may be at risk of dismissal. 

ATTORNEYS MUST SEEK A RESOLUTION PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING OF 

ALL OUTSTANDING ISSUES. The Trustee’s Office has a “Precall” date. During this period, the Debtor’s 

or Creditor’s attorney must call THE THURSDAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING and speak to the Trustee’s 

staff attorney unless they agree to the Trustee’s recommendation. A final calendar will be published with any 

changes of this recommendation the day before the hearing. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for November 15, 2022 hearing. All amendments and documents for the November 15, 

2022 hearing were due as of November 1, 2022. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior 

to "re-sending" documents)

16AP served 10/24

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 12/20

Due on or before 11/22: Amend plan on new plan form (4/1/22) 

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 259 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 1
Jose VIVO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Dayira HERNANDEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1817

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.