alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 487 

To allow the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease or transfer certain lands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2015 

Mr. MULLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To allow the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease or transfer 

certain lands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND 

4 TRANSACTIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, without further approval, ratification, or au7 thorization by the United States, the Miami Tribe of Okla8 homa may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise trans9 fer all or any part of its interests in any real property 

10 that is not held in trust by the United States for the ben11 efit of such tribe. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 487 IH

1 (b) TRUST LAND NOT AFFECTED.—Nothing in this 

2 section shall— 

3 (1) authorize the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to 

4 lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all 

5 or any part of an interest in any real property that 

6 is held in trust by the United States for the benefit 

7 of such tribe; or 

8 (2) affect the operation of any law governing 

9 leasing, selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise 

10 transferring any interest in such trust land. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable Peter J. Panuthos, United States Tax Court Judge.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-1281

___________

Justyn J. Kozikowski, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the

v. * United States Tax Court.

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 7, 2007

Filed: November 15, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Justyn Kozikowski appeals the tax court’s1

 dismissal of his action challenging

the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies. Upon de

novo review, we agree with the tax court that Kozikowski failed to state a plausible

or cognizable claim for relief. See Wilcox v. Comm’r, 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir.

1998) (de novo standard of review); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955,

1974 (2007) (complaint must plead enough facts to state claim for relief that is

plausible); Yuen v. Comm’r, 92 T.C.M. (CCH) 1, 3 (2006) (argument is frivolous

where it is “contrary to established law and unsupported by a reasoned, colorable
-2-

argument for change in the law”); May v. Comm’r, 752 F.2d 1301, 1303-04 & n.3

(8th Cir. 1985) (affirming dismissal for failure to state claim because, even if all of

taxpayer’s allegations were assumed to be true, petition merely contained conclusory

assertions attacking constitutionality of Internal Revenue Code and its applicability

to taxpayer, all of which had been rejected).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Kozikowski’s

pending motions.

______________________________
Curtis H. KOON individually, and Curtis H. Koon as Trustee of the Curtis and Linda Koon Revocable Trust U/T/D July 26, 2005, Appellants, v. LAFAYETTE STATE BANK, a Florida banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 3, 2018

Stephen C. Bullock of Brannon, Brown, Haley & Bullock, P.A., Lake City, for Appellants.

John J. Joyce of Robinson, Kennon & Kendron, P.A., Lake City, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of Appellee's Motion to Dismiss and Appellants' Response, the Court has determined that the appeal must be dismissed because the orders on appeal do not constitute an end to a separate and distinct cause of action so as to be appealable as a partial final judgment. *See**Jensen v. Whetstine* , 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). *Cf.* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). The Motion to Dismiss is granted. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED .

Rowe, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Mathew STROJEK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 1817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. 26140; Amendment No. 25-88]
RIN 2120-AC43

Type and Number of Passenger Emergency Exits Required in 
Transport Category Airplanes

Correction

    In rule document 96-28650, beginning on page 57946, in the issue of 
Friday, November 8, 1996, make the following corrections:

Sec. 25.807  [Corrected]

    1. On page 57957, in the second column, in Sec. 25.807(f)(2), in 
the second line, ``the airplane do not'' should read ``the airplane 
does not''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in Sec. 25.807(f)(3), in 
the second line, ``airplanes'' should read ``airplane''.
    3. On the same page, in the third column, in Sec. 25.807(g)(7), in 
the fifth line, ``in'' should read ``is''.
    4. On the same page, in the third column, in Sec. 25.807(g)(9), in 
the first line, ``of'' should read ``or''.

Sec. 25.810  [Corrected]

    5. On page 57958, in the second column, in Sec. 25.810(d)(3), in 
the fourth line, ``tow'' should read ``two''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 23.2

                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO:  Jackson Rivers Company

As  independent  certified  public  accountants,  we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-KSB under the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 of Jackson Rivers Company for the year ended
December  31,  2002  of  our report dated February 15, 2003 and contained in the
Registration  Statement No. 333-112151 of Jackson Rivers Company Form  S-8 under
the  Securities  Act  of  1933  insofar as such report relates  to the financial
statements  of  Jackson  Rivers  Company  for  the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                /s/  Michaelson & Company, P.A.
                                -------------------------------
                                     Michaelson & Company, P.A.


West Palm Beach, Florida
April 13, 2004


<PAGE>
Case 20-17181-LMI Doc 38 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-17181-LMI Doc 38 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-17181-LMI Doc 38 Filed 09/23/20 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

 )

In re ) CASE NO. 20-15954-RAM

 ) CHAPTER 13

PHUONG MIMI NGUYEN, )

 )

 )

Debtor. )

 )

 )

MELANIE ADAMS, etc., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) ADV. NO. 20-01350-RAM

 )

PHUONG MIMI NGUYEN, )

 )

Defendant. )

 )

FINAL JUDGMENT

The Court conducted a trial in this proceeding on April 28, 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 30, 2021.

Case 20-01350-RAM Doc 32 Filed 04/30/21 Page 1 of 2
2

2021. In accordance with the findings and conclusion announced on 

the record at the end of the trial, it is -

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant, Phuong 

Mimi Nguyen, and against the Plaintiffs, Melanie Adams and Taylor 

Adams.

2. The Plaintiffs’ claims against the Defendant that are 

the subject of this adversary proceeding are not excepted from 

discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2). 

3. Costs will be taxed in favor of the Defendant pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 upon appropriate motion.

###

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

Ricardo A. Rodriguez, Esq.

Zachary Adam Friedman, Esq.

Case 20-01350-RAM Doc 32 Filed 04/30/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Tallgrass prairie restoration: seeding for success      

      July 26, 2013    

View Document

Tallgrass prairie is one of the most imperiled ecosystems on Earth. A 2004 estimate indicated that only 2.4 percent of the original northern tallgrass prairie remained in the United States. If tallgrass prairie and the species dependent on it are to survive, management must include restoration of cropland and degraded prairies, in addition to preservation of the few remaining fragments. Despite the importance of restoration and its long history (the first tallgrass prairie restoration was started in 1935 at Curtis Prairie in Wisconsin), few studies have been undertaken with the goal of refining restoration practice. This fact sheet contains the results of one such study, started in 2005, in which we compared three seeding methods (dormant-season broadcast, growing-season broadcast, and growing-season drill) fully crossed with low (10-), medium (20-), and high (34-species) seed mixes replicated 12 times on each of 9 former agricultural fields in Minnesota and Iowa. Plots were 12.2 x 12.2 meters (m) and occupied about 1.6 hectares (ha) (4 acres) of each field. A “successful” restoration is one in which cover and richness of planted species is maximized and cover of exotic and invasive species, especially the noxious weed Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), is minimized. Details of the planting methods can be located in Larson and others (2011).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Diane Larson, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

dlarson@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Diane Larson, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

dlarson@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Iowa;Minnesota
                  - iowa
                  - Minnesota

View All **
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERRY DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-01092-HMH-11)

Submitted: October 26, 2020 Decided: October 30, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Allen Fernich, LAW OFFICE OF MARC FERNICH, New York, New York, for 

Appellant. Peter M. McCoy, Jr., United States Attorney, Leesa Washington, Assistant 

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, 

South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Davis appeals the district court’s opinion and order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Davis, No. 6:03-cr-01092-HMH11 (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4873 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require each institution 

of higher education to describe how it spends tuition and fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mr. MACARTHUR, and Mr. SMITH of Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

each institution of higher education to describe how it 

spends tuition and fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tuition Use Informa5 tion Transparently Identified Online Act’’ or the ‘‘TUI6 TION Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4873 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISAGGREGATION OF TUITION AND FEES BY INSTI2 TUTIONAL EXPENSES. 

3 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(30) The institution will, on an annual basis— 

7 ‘‘(A) disaggregate the total revenue gen8 erated by the institution from tuition, fees, and 

9 other institutional charges for students enrolled 

10 in programs eligible for assistance under this 

11 title, for the most recent academic year for 

12 which data are available, by the proportion of 

13 such revenue the institution applied toward any 

14 type of institutional expense (such as faculty 

15 salaries or facility maintenance); 

16 ‘‘(B) provide a description of each such ex17 pense; and 

18 ‘‘(C) publish, on its public website in the 

19 location providing admissions information, the 

20 information described in subparagraphs (A) and 

21 (B) in a manner that clearly presents such in22 formation to students (including prospective 

23 students) and their parents.’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4873 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

3 with respect to award year 2016–2017 and each suc4 ceeding award year. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>ims20063ceo906ex32-1.txt
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Monetary Systems,
Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Donald M.
Mardak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Donald M. Mardak
    -----------------------
    Donald M. Mardak
    Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2006
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS VALUATION EXPERT**

 

May6, 2005

 

Witness Systems, Inc.

300 Colonial CenterParkway

Roswell, Georgia 30076

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to the use of thename Taylor Consulting Group, Inc., to references to Taylor Consulting Group,Inc. and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or informationcontained therein, dated January 24, 2005, prepared for Witness Systems, Inc.appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Witness Systems, Inc.

 
| Sincerely,                     |
|--------------------------------|
| Taylor Consulting  Group, Inc. |
|                           |
|                           |
| /s/ MICHAEL HALLIWELL          |   |
|                           |
| Michael Halliwell              |
| Managing Director              |

 

57

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geologic map of the Val Verde 7.5' quadrangle, southern California: A digital database      

      January 1, 1995    

This Open-File report is a digital geologic map database. A pamphlet serves to introduce and describe the digital data. There is no paper map included in the Open-File report.

This digital map database is compiled from previously published sources combined with some new mapping and modifications in nomenclature. The geologic map database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U. S. Geological Survey. For detailed descriptions of the units, their stratigraphic relations and sources of geologic mapping consult Yerkes and Campbell (1995). More specific information about the units may be available in the original sources.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Soil diversity and hydration as observed by ChemCam at Gale crater, Mars      

      January 14, 2013    

The ChemCam instrument, which provides insight into martian soil chemistry at the submillimeter scale, identified two principal soil types along the Curiosity rover traverse: a fine-grained mafic type and a locally derived, coarse-grained felsic type. The mafic soil component is representative of widespread martian soils and is similar in composition to the martian dust. It possesses a ubiquitous hydrogen signature in ChemCam spectra, corresponding to the hydration of the amorphous phases found in the soil by the CheMin instrument. This hydration likely accounts for an important fraction of the global hydration of the surface seen by previous orbital measurements. ChemCam analyses did not reveal any significant exchange of water vapor between the regolith and the atmosphere. These observations provide constraints on the nature of the amorphous phases and their hydration.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
Draft Appendix R

– Chesapeake Bay TMDL for Nutrients and Sediment

R

- 1 September 24 , 2010 Appendix R. Detailed Daily Chesapeake Bay TMDL WLAs and LAs

This appendix presents the detailed daily WLAs and LAs for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL for nutrients and sediment in the following spreadsheet: Appendix R: Detailed Daily Chesapeake Bay TMDL WLAs and LAs for Proposed Amended WQS ( Appendix R_ProposedWQS_DailyLoads_092410 )

. Appendix R includes detailed nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment daily allocations to achieve the proposed amended WQS (Section 8). The spreadsheet lists total nitroge n (TOTN), total phosphorus (TOTP) and total sediment (TSED) loads as both delivered to the Chesapeake Bay’s tidal waters and edge

- of

- stream (discharge to local waterbodies) (Section 9)

. Loading i nformation is reported at both detailed and summary spatial scales and for both detailed and summary source categories

– working from general at the top of the worksheet to more detailed towards the bottom of the worksheet

. Finer scale allocations are shown for each of the 92 segments and by sources for WLA s including agriculture (CAFOs), stormwater (MS4s), wastewater (CSO) and wastewater (significant and nonsignificant by NPDES permit); and for LAs including agriculture, forest, non

- tidal atmospheric deposition, onsite treatment systems, and urban sources.
January 31, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROLANDO MALDONADO GARCIA, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00064-CR V.

NO. 14-11-00065-CR

NO. 14-11-00066-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 504 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 504

To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided by reason of 
  a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star 
                    program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2015

 Mr. Latta (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided by reason of 
  a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Star Program Integrity Act''.

SEC. 2. NO WARRANTY.

    Section 324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 
6294a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) No Warranty.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any disclosure relating to participation 
        of a product in the Energy Star program shall not create an 
        express or implied warranty or give rise to any private claims 
        or rights of action under State or Federal law relating to the 
        disqualification of that product from Energy Star if--
                    ``(A) the product has been certified by a 
                certification body recognized by the Energy Star 
                program;
                    ``(B) the Administrator has approved corrective 
                measures, including a determination of whether or not 
                consumer compensation is appropriate; and
                    ``(C) the responsible party has fully complied with 
                all approved corrective measures.
            ``(2) Construal.--Nothing in this subsection shall be 
        construed to require the Administrator to modify any procedure 
        or take any other action.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 185 (Thursday, September 24, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 50993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10924]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration

30 CFR Part 75


Mandatory Safety Standards--Underground Coal Mines

CFR Correction

    In Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 1 to 199, 
revised as of July 1, 1998, page 579, Sec. 75.1909, paragraph (c)(5) is 
corrected to read as follows:


Sec. 75.1909  Nonpermissible diesel-powered equipment; design and 
performance requirements.

 * * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) Has a means in the equipment operator's compartment to apply 
the brakes manually without shutting down the engine, and a means to 
release and reengage the brakes without the engine operating; and
 * * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D