56956 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 5, 1996 / Notices

Ciba has evaluated the estimated nonoccupational exposure to benoxacor and

based on its low use rate concludes that

the potential for non-occupational

exposure to the general population is

unlikely except for the potential

residues in food crops discussed above.

Benoxacor is used only on agricultural

crops and is not used in or around the

home.

4. Cumulative Effects

Ciba also considered the potential for

cumulative effects of benoxacor and

other substances that have a common

mechanism of toxicity. Ciba concluded

that consideration of a common

mechanism of toxicity is not appropriate

at this time. Ciba does not have any

reliable information to indicate that

toxic effects seen at high doses of

benoxacor (generalized liver toxicity,

nephrotoxicity and the occurrence of

forestomach tumors in an organ not

present in humans) would be

cumulative with those of any other

chemical compounds; thus Ciba is

considering only the potential risks of

benoxacor in its aggregate exposure

assessment.

5. Safety Determination

A. U.S. Population

Using the conservative exposure

assumptions described above and based

on the completeness and reliability of

the toxicity data base for benoxacor,

Ciba has calculated that aggregate

exposure to benoxacor will utilize 9.4%

of the RfD for the U.S. population based

on chronic toxicity endpoints and only

0.4% based on a margin of exposure

assessment and a carcinogenic NOEL of

4.2 mg/kg/day. EPA generally has no

concern for exposures below 100

percent of the RfD because the RfD

represents the level at or below which

daily aggregate dietary exposure over a

lifetime will not pose appreciable risks

to human health. Ciba concludes that

there is a reasonable certainty that no

harm will result from aggregate

exposure to benoxacor residues.

B. Infants and Children

Using the same conservative exposure

assumptions used for the determination

in the general population, Ciba has

concluded that the percent of the RfD

that will be utilized by aggregate

exposure to residues of benoxacor is

10.5% for nursing infants less than 1

year old, 40.4% for non-nursing infants,

23.8% for children 1–6 years old and

15.4% for children 7–12 years old.

These worst case estimates are likely at

least 4 times greater than actual values

when considering that benoxacor

residues have not been detected at the

limit of quantitation of 0.005 ppm

(tolerance is 0.01 ppm) and using a

more realistic market share of 50%

rather than the conservative 100%.

Therefore, based on the completeness

and reliability of the toxicity data base

and the conservative exposure

assessment, Ciba concludes that there is

a reasonable certainty that no harm will

result to infants and children from

aggregate exposure to benoxacor

residues.

6. International Tolerances

A maximum residue level has not

been established for benoxacor by the

Codex Alimentarius Commission.

II. Administrative Matters:

Interested persons are invited to

submit comments on this notice of

filing. Comments must bear a notation

indicating the document control

number, [PF–672].

A record has been established for this

rulemaking under docket number [PF–

672] (including comments and data

submitted electronically as described

below). A public version of this record,

including printed, paper versions of

electronic comments, which does not

include any information claimed as CBI,

is available for inspection from 8 a.m. to

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The public

record is located in Rm. 1132 of the

Public Response and Program Resources

Branch, Field Operations Division

(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis

Highway, Arlington, VA.

Electronic comments may be sent

directly to EPA at:

opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov.

Electronic comments must be

submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the

use of special characters and any form

of encryption.

The official record for this notice, as

well as the public version, as described

above will be kept in paper form.

Accordingly, EPA will transfer all

comments received electronically into

printed, paper form as they are received

and will place the paper copies in the

official notice record which will also

include all comments submitted directly

in writing. The official rulemaking

record is the paper record maintained at

the address in ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ at the

beginning of this document.

List of Subjects

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: October 31, 1996.

Stephen L. Johnson,

Director, Registration Division, Office of

Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 96–28551 Filed 11–1–96; 1:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

October 31, 1996.

Deletion of Agenda Item From October

29th Open Meeting

The following item has been deleted

from the list of agenda items scheduled

for consideration at the October 29,

1996, Open Meeting and previously

listed in the Commission’s Notice of

October 22, 1996 (61 FR 55637, October

28, 1996).

Item No. Bureau Subject

2 ............... Wireless Telecommunications ............. Title: Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Regarding a Plan for Sharing the Costs of

Microwave Relocation (WTDocket No. 95–157, RM–8643).

Summary: The Commission will consider action concerning the relocation of microwave

incumbents in the 2 GHz band.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 5, 1996 / Notices 56957

Federal Communications Commission

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–28511 Filed 11–1–96; 10:42 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

[Report No. 2160]

Petitions for Reconsideration and

Clarification of Action in Rulemaking

Proceedings

October 30, 1996.

Petitions for reconsideration and

clarification have been filed in the

Commission’s rulemaking proceedings

listed in this Public Notice and

published pursuant to 47 CFR Section

1.429(e). The full text of these

documents are available for viewing and

copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street,

NW., Washington, DC, or may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857–3800.

Oppositions to these petitions must be

filed by November 20, 1996. See Section

1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules (47

CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition

must be filed within 10 days after the

time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: Access to Telecommunications

Equipment and Services by Persons

With Disabilities. (CC Docket No.

87–124)

Number of Petitions Filed: 1

Subject: Petition to amend Part 68 of the

Commission’s Rules to Include

Terminal Equipment Connected to

Basic Rate Access Service Provided

via Integrated Services Digital

Network Access Technology. (CC

Docket No. 93–268)

Petition to amend Part 68 of the

Commission’s Rules to include

Terminal Equipment connected to

Public Switched Digital Services.

(RM–7815, RM–6147)

Number of Petitions Filed: 1

Subject: Preemption of Local Zoning

Regulation of Satellite Earth

Stations. (IB Docket No. 95–59)

Implementation of Section 207 of the

Telecommunications Act of 1996;

Restrictions on Over-the-Air

Devices: Television Broadcast

Service and Multichannel

Multipoint Distribution Service. (CS

Docket No. 96–83)

Number of Petitions Filed: 8

Subject: Implementation of the Local

Competition Provisions in the

Telecommunications Act of 1996.

(CC Docket No. 96–98)

Interconnection between Local

Exchange Carriers and Commercial

Mobile Radio Service Providers.

(CC Docket 95–185)

Number of Petitions Filed: 20 *

*These filings include the petition filed by

SBC Communications Inc. and Southwestern

Bell Telephone Company on October 8, 1996,

one day after the filing deadline of October

7, 1996. On October 8, 1996, SBC

Communications Inc. and Southwestern Bell

Telephone Company also filed a Motion to

Accept its Late-Filed Pleading.

Federal Communications Commission

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–28327 Filed 11–4–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

The Federal Maritime Commission

hereby gives notice of the filing of the

following agreement(s) pursuant to

section 5 of the Shipping Act of 1984.

Interested parties may inspect and

obtain a copy of each agreement at the

Washington, D.C. Office of the Federal

Maritime Commission, 800 North

Capitol Street, N.W., 9th Floor.

Interested parties may submit comments

on each agreement to the Secretary,

Federal Maritime Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20573, within 10 days

after the date of the Federal Register in

which this notice appears. The

requirements for comments are found in

section 572.603 of Title 46 of the Code

of Federal Regulations. Interested

persons should consult this section

before communicating with the

Commission regarding a pending

agreement.

Agreement No.: 217–011553–001.

Title: CSAV/Nacional Space Charter

Agreement.

Parties:

Companhia Maritime Nacional

(‘‘Nacional’’)

Compania Sud Americana de Vapores

S.A. (‘‘CSAV’’)

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement

modifies the space charter provision to

include the chartering of space from

Nacional to CSAV. The parties have

requested a shortened review period.

Agreement No.: 224–201000.

Title: Port of San Francisco/Flota

Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A. (FMG)

Serpac Service Terminal Agreement.

Parties:

Port of San Francisco (‘‘Port’’)

Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A.

(‘‘FMG’’)

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement

permits FMG the nonexclusive right to

use the Port’s South Container Terminal

under terms and conditions set forth in

the Agreement. The term of the

Agreement is five years.

Agreement No.: 224–201001.

Title: Port of San Francisco/Columbus

Line Serpac Service Terminal

Agreement.

Parties:

Port of San Francisco (‘‘Port’’)

Columbus Line (‘‘Columbus’’)

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement

permits Columbus the non-exclusive

right to use the Port’s South Container

Terminal under terms and conditions

set forth in the Agreement. The term of

the Agreement is five years.

Agreement No.: 224–201002.

Title: Port of San Francisco/Compania

Sud Americana De Vapores, S.A.

(CSAV) SERPAC Service Marine

Terminal Agreement.

Parties:

Port of San Francisco

Compania Sud Americana De

Vapores, S.A. (‘‘CSAV’’)

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement

allows CSAV the non-exclusive right to

use the South Container Terminal at the

Port of San Francisco under terms and

conditions set forth in the Agreement.

The term of the Agreement is for five

years.

Agreement No.: 224–201003.

Title: City of Los Angeles and Matson

Terminals, Inc., Marine Terminal Permit

No. 776.

Parties:

City of Los Angeles

Matson Terminals, Inc.

Synopsis: The proposed Agreement is

a revenue sharing agreement granted by

the City of Los Angeles to Matson

Terminals, Inc. under permit No. 776.

The term of the Agreement is not to

exceed three (3) years.

By Order of the Federal Maritime

Commission.

Dated: October 30, 1996.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–28354 Filed 11–4–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Agency information collection

activities: Proposed collection;

Comment request

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System (Board)

ACTION: Notice and request for comment.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

requirements of the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.

chapter 35), the Board, the Federal

Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),

and the Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency (OCC) (the ‘‘Agencies’’) may