alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 85-1641.

#### Mulligan *v.*Hazard et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White,

with whom Justice Marshall joins,

dissenting.

In *Wilson*v. *Garcia,*471 U. S. 261 (1985), we held that an action brought under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 should be considered a personal injury action for purposes of borrowing an appropriate state statute of limitations. Since our decision in that case, the Courts of Appeals have differed on whether *Wilson*should be given retro*1175active effect. In the present case, the Sixth Circuit held, without qualification, that *Wilson*should be given retroactive effect. 777 F. 2d 340 (1985). The Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits have reached similar results. *Gates*v. *Spinks,*771 F. 2d 916 (CA5 1985), cert. denied, 475 U. S. 1065 (1986); *Jones*v. *Preuit & Mauldin,*763 F. 2d 1250 (CA11 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1105 (1986). Two other Courts of Appeals, however, have determined that when retroactive application would shorten the statute of limitations, *Wilson*merits only prospective relief. *Gibson*v. *United States,*781 F. 2d 1334 (CA9 1986); *Jackson*v. *City of Bloomfield,*731 F. 2d 652 (CA10 1984). Although the Third and Eighth Circuits have applied *Wilson*retroactively in certain cases, it is unclear whether their holdings are designed to have universal application. See *Wycoff*v. *Menke,*773 F. 2d 983, 986-987 (CA8 1985); *Fitzgerald*v. *Larson,*769 F. 2d 160, 162-164 (CA3 1985); *Smith*v. *City of Pittsburgh,*764 F. 2d 188, 194-196 (CA3 1985).

In addition, the Courts of Appeals also have reached conflicting results concerning what should be done when more than one state statute of limitations applies to personal injury actions. In *Hamilton*v. *City of Overton Park,*730 F. 2d 613 (1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1052 (1985), and *Mismash*v. *Murray City,*730 F. 2d 1366 (1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1052 (1985), the Tenth Circuit rejected, for § 1983 purposes, the state statute of limitations for intentional torts, and chose instead a State’s residual statute of limitations. See generally *Preuit & Mauldin*v. *Jones,*474 U. S. 1105, 1106-1107 (1986) (White, J. dissenting from denial of certiorari). The Eleventh Circuit in *Jones*v. *Preuit & Mauldin, supra,*the Fifth Circuit in *Gates*v. *Spinks, supra,*and the Sixth Circuit in the present case, however, follow a different rule, and select the state statute of limitations governing intentional torts.

The Court’s decision not to review the instant case marks the third time this Term that it has refused to address these differences that exist between the Courts of Appeals; differences that are not likely to disappear without guidance from this Court. Given the square conflicts among the Circuits, and the frequency with which these cases arise, I would grant the petition for certiorari in this case.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Rapisand, Director of Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate, effective as of June 13, 2003.



/s/    MICHAEL J.
RAPISANDMichael J. Rapisand,Chief Financial Officer TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.




Note 1: The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



Note 2: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Transient uplift after a 17th-century earthquake along the kuril subduction zone      

      January 1, 2004    

In eastern Hokkaido, 60 to 80 kilometers above a subducting oceanic plate, tidal mudflats changed into freshwater forests during the first decades after a 17th-century tsunami. The mudflats gradually rose by a meter, as judged from fossil diatom assemblages. Both the tsunami and the ensuing uplift exceeded any in the region's 200 years of written history, and both resulted from a shallow plate-boundary earthquake of unusually large size along the Kuril subduction zone. This earthquake probably induced more creep farther down the plate boundary than did any of the region's historical events.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content
Robert Louis ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D17-1795 1D17-1796 1D17-1797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Wolf, J.

This appeal stems from a mandatory resentencing of appellant required by *Graham v. Florida* , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). The trial court vacated appellant's life sentences and resentenced him to life in prison in accordance with section 921.1401, Florida Statutes. Appellant raises three issues on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in weighing and failing to weigh several factors *719before resentencing appellant to life in prison; (II) whether the trial court erred in denying appellant's request for a jury finding under section 921.1401 ; and (III) whether section 921.1401 is facially unconstitutional.

We determine appellant failed to demonstrate that the trial court erred in considering the factors in section 921.1401 and affirm as to Issue I without further discussion.

As to Issues II and III, appellant complains that section 921.1401 requires the judge, not the jury, to consider certain factors in determining whether to impose a life sentence. He contends that this statute is directly analogous to Florida's former capital sentencing statute, which required a judge to find mitigating or aggravating factors that would warrant the death penalty. This capital punishment statute was declared unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment because a jury, not a judge, must to find each fact necessary to impose a death sentence. *Hurst v. Florida* , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016) (citing *Apprendi v. New Jersey* , 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) ). Appellant thus argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury to make findings as to the sentencing factors set forth in section 921.1401.

We rejected these arguments in *Copeland v. State* , 240 So.3d 58, 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), for the reasons expressed in *Beckman v. State* , 230 So.3d 77, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED .

Bilbrey and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Adam Justin STOVALL v. STATE

CR-15-0848

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 27, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10627]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO.: 19-21514-BKC-LMI 

MARGARITA CORONADO DE LA TORRE CHAPTER 13

 DEBTOR(S). /

MOTION TO ALLOW SHORT SALE OF HOMESTEAD PROPERTY

COME NOW, the Debtor, Margarita Coronado De La Torre, by and through her undersigned counsel and file this Motion to Allow Short Sale of Homestead Property and as grounds 

therefore states:

1. Debtor filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 on August 28, 2019.

2. The Debtor currently has a proposed contract for sale of her homestead property located at

6061 Collins Avenue, Apartment #14A, Miami Beach, FL 33140. A copy of the Residential 

Contract for Sale is attached hereto as “Exhibit A”. 

3. The sales price will require the sale to be a short sale transaction and, as of the time of 

filing of this motion, the Debtor will not receive any proceeds from the closing. 

4. Short sale is subject to secured creditor’s approval prior to the said sale.

5. The title agency handling the short-sale transactions is awaiting court approval in order to 

close the transaction. 

WHEREFORE, the Debtor, Margarita Coronado De La Torre, respectfully request this Court 

enter an Order Granting Debtor’s Motion to Allow Short Sale of Homestead Property.

I Hereby Certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in the 

Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1 

Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Patrick L Cordero, Esq. 

Attorney for Debtor 

7333 Coral Way 

Miami, Florida 33155

Tel: (305) 445-4855

 /s/ (FILED ECF) (The Debtor's Attorney)

Patrick L. Cordero, Esq., FL Bar No. 801992

Case 19-21514-LMI Doc 51 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Synchronous emplacement of the anorthosite xenolith-bearing Beaver River diabase and one of the largest lava flows on Earth      

      September 13, 2021    

New geochronologic and paleomagnetic data from the North American Midcontinent Rift (MCR) reveal the synchronous emplacement of the Beaver River diabase, the anorthosite xenoliths within it, and the Greenstone Flow—one of the largest lava flows on Earth. A U-Pb zircon date of 1091.83  0.21 Ma (2) from one of the anorthosite xenoliths is consistent with the anorthosite cumulate forming as part of the MCR and provides a maximum age constraint for the Beaver River diabase. Paired with the minimum age constraint of a cross-cutting Silver Bay intrusion (1091.61  0.14 Ma; 2), these data tightly bracket the age of the Beaver River diabase to be 1091.7  0.2 Ma (95% CI), coeval with the eruption of the Greenstone Flow (1091.59  0.27 Ma; 2)—which is further supported by indistinguishable tilt-corrected paleomagnetic pole positions. Geochronological, paleomagnetic, mineralogical and geochemical data are consistent with a hypothesis that the Beaver River diabase was the feeder system for the Greenstone Flow. The large areal extent of the intrusives and large estimated volume of the volcanics suggest that they represent a rapid and voluminous ca. 1,092 Ma magmatic pulse near the end of the main stage of MCR magmatism.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Margaret Avery, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

mavery@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Margaret Avery, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

mavery@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Geology
                  - Methods and Analyses
                  - United States
                  - Michigan
                  -  Minnesota
                  - Beaver River Structure

View All **
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                              Ending
Class        Interest        Principal     Losses            Balance
<S>            <C>              <C>          <C>               <C>
A-1        5085732.55      63489419.56          0       119994580.44
A-2         1886178.6                0          0           56388000
A-3        1637250.12                0          0           47183000
A-4         546841.98                0          0           15404000
A-5         735861.18                0          0           20133000
A-6            452175                0          0           12058000
A-7        1396940.82                0          0           38912000


</TABLE>
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

D01 RBP Final Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit15-May-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP D02 RBP Response to Comments 16-May-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP D03 RBP Final Notice of Permit Issuance 16-May-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP D04 Public Comments Received 16-May-12 Numerous Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Final Prevention of Signification Deterioration Permit Documents UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 9 Administrative Record Index Rio Bravo Poso (RBP) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Permit No. SJ 85-06 May 2012

### Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

A01 RBP Minor Modification Ambient Air Quality Impacts Report 2-Mar-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP A02 RBP PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (English) 2-Mar-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP A03 RBP PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (Spanish) 2-Mar-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP A04 RBP Proposed Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 2-Mar-12Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP Proposed Prevention of Signification Deterioration Documents REGION 9 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Administrative Record Index Rio Bravo Poso (RBP) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Permit No. SJ 85-06 March 2012

### Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

B01 Technical Support Document Facts 7-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 B02 Rio Bravo Poso Contact Information 18-Nov-11Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 B03 US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) Discussion 8-Dec-11 Damian Higgins, USFWS Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 E-mail Communications Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 9 Administrative Record Index Rio Bravo Poso Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06 March 2012Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

C01 Minor Modification Request 17-May-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 C02 Site Specific Modification Questions 12-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 C03 Baseline Actual Calculations 27-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 C04 Trial Burn Extension Request 22-Jul-11 Maynard Adams, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 C05 Greenhouse Gas Calculations 12-Oct-11 Eric Moller, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 C06 Trial Burn Report 7-Nov-11 Catherine Castillo, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 C07 Application Completeness Determination 24-Feb-11 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, Rio Bravo Poso Correspondence Material Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 9 Administrative Record Index Rio Bravo Poso Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06 March 2012
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           On the twenty-first-century wet season projections over the Southeastern United States      

      August 1, 2013    

This paper reconciles the difference in the projections of the wet season over the Southeastern United States (SEUS) from a global climate model (the Community Climate System Model Version 3 [CCSM3]) and from a regional climate model (the Regional Spectral Model [RSM]) nested in the CCSM3. The CCSM3 projects a dipole in the summer precipitation anomaly: peninsular Florida dries in the future climate, and the remainder of the SEUS region becomes wetter. The RSM forced with CCSM3 projects a universal drying of the SEUS in the late twenty-first century relative to the corresponding twentieth-century summer. The CCSM3 pattern is attributed to the “upped-ante” mechanism, whereby the atmospheric boundary layer moisture required for convection increases in a warm, statically stable global tropical environment. This criterion becomes harder to meet along convective margins, which include peninsular Florida, resulting in its drying. CCSM3 also projects a southwestward expansion of the North Atlantic subtropical high that leads to further stabilizing of the atmosphere above Florida, inhibiting convection. The RSM, because of its high (10-km grid) resolution, simulates diurnal variations in summer rainfall over SEUS reasonably well. The RSM improves upon CCSM3 through the RSM’s depiction of the diurnal variance of precipitation, which according to observations accounts for up to 40 % of total seasonal precipitation variance. In the future climate, the RSM projects a significant reduction in the diurnal variability of convection. The reduction is attributed to large-scale stabilization of the atmosphere in the CCSM3 projections.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alabama;Arkansas;Florida;Georgia;Kentucky;Louisiana;Mississippi;Missouri;North Carolina;South Carolina;Tennessee;Virginia
                  - Alabama
                  - Arkansas
                  - Florida
                  - Georgia
                  - Kentucky
                  - Louisiana
                  - mississippi
                  - missouri
                  - North Carolina
                  - South Carolina
                  - tennessee
                  - Virginia

View All **
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 13, 2008
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00330

- CV

R EMBERT E NTERPRISES

, I NC

., Appellant

V

.

1309, LLC, C HARLIE C UMMINGS

, AND

J O C UMMINGS , Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 367th District

Court

of Denton County (16

- 10107

- 36 7)

July 25, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Rembert E nterprises, Inc. shall pay all of the

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
June 6, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA)

Attendees :

EPA: Ellen Kurlansky, OAR/OPAR

NACAA: Bill Becker, NACAA Mary Sullivan Douglas, NACAA Bruce Buckheit, consultant

Discussion :

A general discussion of the Mercury and Air Toxi cs Standards was held. The attached materials
were discussed.

Meeting all floors_NACAA_060211.xls

Units meeting floors_NACAA_060211.doc
From: Frey, Nathan J.
To: Culligan, Kevin ; Hutson, Nick ; Wayland, Robertj Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: We have concluded our review under EO 12866 and 13563
Date: Thursday, September 19, 2013 6:34:49 PM

Thanks to all for your patience throughout!

From : Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov] Sent : Thursday, September 19, 2013 03:14 PM To : Frey, Nathan J.; Hutson, Nick <Hutson.Nick@epa.gov>; Wayland, Robertj <Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov> Cc : Tsirigotis, Peter <Tsirigotis.Peter@epa.gov> Subject : Re: Talked to Peter

E-mail me when you are ready to talk

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 2:18:36 PM
To: Culligan, Kevin; Hutson, Nick; Wayland, Robertj
Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: RE: Talked to Peter

Thanks Kevin. Can you or Peter give me a quick call? (202) 395 7345

From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:38 PM To: Frey, Nathan J.; Hutson, Nick; Wayland, Robertj Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: Talked to Peter

We think this is clearer and represents the ideas we talked about.

While intended for plants that lie between FOAK and NOAK in the maturity spectrum, “the next commercial offering” cost estimate shown in table 6 can in practice be either higher or lower. For example the costs can be higher if the original cost estimates are optimistic about improvements that occur between the FOAK and the “next commercial offering”. On the other hand, costs can be lower if advances due to the significant research efforts underway lead to advances not considered in developing the original cost estimates.

From: Frey, Nathan J. [ mailto:Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:50 AM To: Culligan, Kevin; Hutson, Nick; Wayland, Robertj Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: RE: EGU NSPS -- Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 13563

Thanks – I have a minor suggestion if you second to give me a quick call. Almost there!

From: Culligan, Kevin [ mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov ]Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:26 AM To: Frey, Nathan J.; Hutson, Nick; Wayland, Robertj Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: RE: EGU NSPS -- Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 13563

Nathan,

After we spoke, I got further direction from Peter. We believe that the text starting with “despite the application.....” should be deleted because it is conjecture and not factual (and ignores the other side of the story, because it is often shown that projections like this are un-necessarily pessimistic and costs

- Kevin

From: Frey, Nathan J. [ mailto:Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:44 AM To: Culligan, Kevin; Hutson, Nick; Wayland, Robertj Subject: EGU NSPS -- Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 13563

Hello all,

Attached please find a summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 regarding the issue(s) discussed yesterday. Please let me know ASAP if you would like to arrange a call to
discuss.

Thanks,

Nathan