alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tyson MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and asrequired by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nathaniel EnergyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained insuch Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2006

 
|        | By:    | /s/ TIMOTHY A. PEACH    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Timothy A. Peach        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Michel Jason JOLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5458

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 10895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-258-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tarrif

Correction

    In notice document 97-5323, appearing on page 10032, in the issue 
of Wednesday, March 5, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 10032, in the second column, ``[Docket No. RP97-258-000]'' 
should be inserted before the subject line.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUTPCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No. 20-23437-PDRRoberto Fernandez

Madelaide Tome

 Debtor(s). Chapter 13

_________________________/

MOTION TO MODIFY CHAPTER 13 PLAN

COME NOW, the Debtors, by and through the undersigned counsel and file this 

Motion to Modify Chapter 13 Plan and as grounds states as follows: 

1. On December 10, 2020 the instant case was filed. 

2. On March 15, 2021 Debtor’s Second Amended Chapter 13 plan was 

confirmed. 

3. The Debtors have experienced a material financial hardship due to 

COVID-19 since the Debtor had been working less hours at the port. 

4. The Debtors submit to modify their current plan under the CARES Act § 

1113(b)(1)(C) which modifies §§ 1329 (d)(1)-(3) and seeks to extend plan 

payments for a total of 84 months. 

5. Furthermore, after the confirmation of Debtors’ plan, Creditor Internal 

Revenue Service filed Proof of Claim 34 that listed a priority amount. 

6. Debtors also desire to modify the plan in order to provide for the new 

payment.

WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel prays that this Honorable Court enter an 

Order Granting and Approving Debtors’ FIRST Modified Plan.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District 

Case 20-23437-PDR Doc 35 Filed 08/24/21 Page 1 of 2
Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional 

qualifications to practice in this Court as set forth in Local Rule 910(A). 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY, that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

sent via ecf to Robin R. Weiner, Trustee and U.S. Mail on August 24, 2021: to all parties 

on the service list.

Respectfully Submitted: 

ROBERT SANCHEZ, P.A. 

Attorney for Debtors

355 W 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Tel. 305-687-8008

By:/s/ Robert Sanchez_____________

 Robert Sanchez, Esq., FBN#0442161

Case 20-23437-PDR Doc 35 Filed 08/24/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Nos. 333-121624, 333-119551, 333-118266, 333-114684, 333-112151 and
333-108120 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 3, 2006, relating to the
financial statements of The Jackson Rivers Company, which appear in this
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of The Jackson Rivers Company
for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Malone & Bailey, PC

Malone & Bailey, PC
www.malone-bailey.com
Houston, Texas

May 26, 2006
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Renee WOOL, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5261

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
First Amendment to the Energy Partners, Ltd. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.23 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 

2009 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN OF 
 ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD. 
 Section 3(a) of the Energy Partners, Ltd. 2009
Long Term Incentive Plan, effective as of September 21, 2009 (the “2009 LTIP”), is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 

“3. Shares Available Under the Plan. (a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(b) and
Section 13 of this Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued or transferred (i) upon the exercise of Option Rights or Appreciation Rights, (ii) as Restricted Shares and released from substantial risks of forfeiture
thereof, (iii) as Deferred Shares, (iv) in payment of Performance Shares, Performance Units or Restricted Stock Units that have been earned shall not exceed in the aggregate 2,474,000 shares of Common Stock, plus any shares described in
Section 3(b). Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing.” 

Duly adopted effective as of the 26th day of May, 2011. 

 

			
	ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.
		
	By:	 	/s/ John H. Peper
		 	 John H. Peper
 Executive
Vice President, General
 Counsel and Corporate Secretary




  
 1
<page>                                       EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  May 10, 2004           /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Synthesized flood frequency of urban streams in Alabama      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

No abstract available. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alabama

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 65412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X02-11024]



Federal Register&thnsp;/&thnsp;Vol. 67, No. 206&thnsp;/
&thnsp;Thursday, October 24, 2002&thnsp;/&thnsp;CORRECTIONS

[[Page 65412]]



DEPARMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 48–2002]


Foreign-Trade Zone 185—Culpeper, Virginia; Application For 
Foreign-Trade Subzone Status, Flint Ink North America Corporation 
(Pigments, Inks, and Varnish Products) Weyers Cave, VA

Correction

    In notice document 02–26416 beginning on page 64095 in the 
issue of Thursday, October 17, 2002, make the following correction:
    On page 64096, in the first column, in the third full paragraph, in 
the sixth line, “January 2, 2003” should read 
“December 31, 2002”.

[FR Doc. C2–26416 Filed 10–23–02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

d0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

137669 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137669 

 COA: 280601 

Dickinson CC: 06-003660-FC 

PHILLIP GREGORY BAL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 18170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30410]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

2335

Vol. 61, No. 17

Thursday, January 25, 1996

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

29 CFR Chapter XIV

Older Workers Benefit Protection Act

of 1990 (OWBPA)

Correction

Proposed rule document 96-553,

beginning on page 1282 in the issue of

Friday, January 19, 1996, was

inadvertently published in the Rules

and Regulations section. It should have

appeared in the Proposed Rules section.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

45 CFR Part 96

RIN 0930-AA01

Tobacco Regulation for Substance

Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block

Grants

Correction

In rule document 96–467 beginning

on page 1492 in the issue of Friday,

January 19, 1996, make the following

correction:

§ 96.122 [Corrected]

On page 1508, in the first column, in

the amendatory instruction to § 96.122,

the third line should read ‘‘paragraphs

(g)(21) and (g)(22) as (g)(22) and’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Variability in weather and site properties affect fuel and fire behavior following fuel treatments in semiarid sagebrush-steppe.      

      February 2, 2024    

Fuel-treatments targeting shrubs and fire-prone exotic annual grasses (EAGs) are increasingly used to mitigate increased wildfire risks in arid and semiarid environments, and understanding their response to natural factors is needed for effective landscape management. Using field-data collected over four years from fuel-break treatments in semiarid sagebrush-steppe, we asked 1) how the outcomes of EAG and sagebrush fuel treatments varied with site biophysical properties, climate, and weather, and 2) how predictions of fire behavior using the Fuel Characteristic Classification System fire model related to land-management objectives of maintaining fire behavior expected of low-load, dry-climate grasslands. Generalized linear mixed effect modeling with build-up model selection was used to determine best-fit models, and marginal effects plots to assess responses for each fuel type. EAG cover decreased as antecedent-fall precipitation increased and increased as antecedent-spring temperatures and surface soil clay contents increased. Herbicides targeting EAGs were less effective where pre-treatment EAG cover was >40 % and antecedent spring temperatures were >9.5 °C. Sagebrush cover was inversely related to soil clay content, especially where clay contents were >17 %. Predicted fire behavior exceeded management objectives under 1) average fire weather conditions when EAG or sagebrush cover was >50 % or >26 %, respectively, or 2) extreme fire weather conditions when EAG or sagebrush cover was >10 % or >8 %, respectively. Consideration of the strong effects of natural variability in site properties and antecedent weather can help in justifying, planning and implementing fuel-treatments.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Matthew J Germino

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

mgermino@usgs.gov

208-221-4638

## Related Content

#### Matthew J Germino

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

mgermino@usgs.gov

208-221-4638

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho
                  -  Oregon

View All **
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mark Bradley SNOOK, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2362

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rocco J. Carbone, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals the dismissal of the information charging Snook with driving while his driver's license was canceled, suspended or revoked as a habitual offender, a third-degree felony. The State argues that the trial court did not have a valid legal basis for dismissing the charge. We agree.

After defense counsel stated at a sidebar that he was ready for trial, the trial court indicated that upon an oral motion it would dismiss the case because Snook had his license back and there were more serious cases on the docket. Back on the record, the trial court advised defense counsel to make his oral motion. Defense counsel simply stated, "Your Honor, the defense moves to dismiss." After Snook made several unsworn statements, the trial court, over the State's objection, granted the ore tenus motion to dismiss, finding that Snook no longer deserved to be prosecuted and doing so would put "him back on the treadmill of failure."

While the trial court may have had good intentions, it abused its discretion when it dismissed the case without a valid legal ground. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.190(c)(4) (2016); *State v. Franklin*, 901 So.2d 394, 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (finding trial court abused its discretion when it sua sponte dismissed charges over State's objection based on defendant's efforts to obtain a license, the cost to taxpayers to prosecute, and "the best interest of judicial economy"); *see also* *State v. A.J.*, --- So.3d ----, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D352 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 14, 2018) (finding trial court abused its discretion when it granted juvenile's oral motion to dismiss over State's objection based upon trial court's perspective of most suitable way to address juvenile's circumstances); *State v. Brosky*, 79 So.3d 134, 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (emphasizing *678that prosecutor's discretion to charge and prosecute criminal acts cannot be thwarted by trial court's belief that the public or the parties would be better served by dismissal (citing *State v. Cleveland*, 390 So.2d 364, 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), *approved by*, 417 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1982) ) ); *State v. Wheeler* *,* 745 So.2d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (explaining that despite trial court's belief that dismissal is in best interest of public and parties, the state attorney makes final determination to prosecute); *State v. Burnett* *,* 468 So.2d 1119, 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (highlighting that rules of criminal procedure enumerate grounds for dismissal and trial court's dismissal of charges without valid legal ground was tantamount to a nolle prosequi, an action vested solely in discretion of State). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSE and REMAND.

EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Ja

,I Eo s rq r

~ ,S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY z o 

### ~~~ /J Q WASHINGTON ; D.C. 20460 2 ~ 1j

~ Li ?

~ F

~

o 

### PROS NOV 13 2014

OFFICE OF WATER

Ms. Alexandra Dapolito Dunn Executive Director The Environmental Council of States SO F Street NW Suite 350 Washington, DC 20001
Dear Ms. Dunn: I am pleased to update you regarding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) efforts to provide clarification on assumable waters under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404(g). In Nancy Stoner's June 13, 2014, response to your letter requesting such clarification, Ms. Stoner indicated she had asked her staff to identify a path forward that would engage your organization, as well as other appropriate state, federal and tribal partners and technical experts in a process that seeks to provide this improved clarity. As my staff recently discussed with you, the EPA plans to establish a subcommittee under the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). This council, subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, provides independent advice to the EPA administrator on a broad range of environmental policy, technology and management issues. The charge to this subcommittee would be to make recommendations to the EPA on clarifying the waters for which a state or tribe may assume permitting responsibility under CWA Section 404(g) and the waters for which the Corps of Engineers retains permitting responsibility. These recommendations will then be considered for incorporation into an update of the CWA Section 404(g) regulations. We will be seeking nominations for members of the NACEPT subcommittee, and I encourage you to nominate a member of your organization as well as identify other technical experts that you believe should be involved in this effort. The EPA is committed to providing clarity and removing barriers to state assumption of CWA Section 404(g) permitting authority. I believe a NACEPT subcommittee will foster a robust discussion amongst technical experts and interested parties on various approaches to clarifying assumable waters under CWA Section 404(g). I look forward to ECOS' participation in this effort.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov RecycledlRecyclabte • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperFeel free to contact me if you have any questions on this issue, or your staff may contact Mr. John

Goodin, Acting Director of the EPA's Wetlands Division at Goodin.John@epa.gov or (202) 566-1373 for further information. Sincerely,



# ~ Kenneth J. Kopocis Deputy Assistant Administrator

cc: Ms. Julia Anastasio Executive Director and General Counsel Association of Clean Water Administrators
Ms. Jeanne Christie Executive Director Association of State Wetland Managers
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Rapid heat-flowing surveying of geothermal areas, utilizing individual snowfalls as calorimeters      

      January 1, 1969    

Local differences in rate of heat transfer in vapor and by conduction through the ground in hot spring areas are difficult and time-consuming to measure quantitatively. Individual heavy snowfalls provide a rapid low-cost means of measuring total heat flow from such ground. After a favorable snowfall (heavy, brief duration, little wind, air temperature near 0°C), contacts between snow-covered and snow-free ground are mapped on a suitable base. Each mapped contact, as time elapses after a specific snowfall, is a heat-flow contour representing a decreasing rate of flow. Calibration of each mapped contact or snow line is made possible by the fact that snow remains on insulated surfaces (such as the boardwalks of Yellowstone's thermal areas) long after it has melted on adjacent warm ground. Heat-flow contours mapped to date range from 450 to 5500 μcal/cm2 sec, or 300 to 3700 times the world average of conductive heat flow. The very high rates of heat flow (2000 to > 10,000 μcal/cm2 sec) are probably too high, and the lower heat flows determinable by the method (<500 μcal/cm2 sec) may be too low. Values indicated by the method are, however, probably within a factor of 2 of the total conductive and convective heat flow. Thermal anomalies from infrared imagery are similar in shape to heat-flow contours of a test area near Old Faithful geyser. Snowfall calorimetry provides a rapid means for evaluating the imagery and computer-derived products of the infrared data in terms of heat flow.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Yellowstone National Park

View All **