alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             COMPLETEL EUROPE N.V.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (Stated in thousands of U.S. Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Period from
                                                                commencement
                                                                of operations
                                               Year           (January 8, 1998)
                                        Ended December 31,         Through
                                               1999               December 31,
                                                                     1998
                                        ------------------    -----------------
<S>                                     <C>                   <C>
Earnings available for fixed charges:
   Net loss before income taxes                    (51,956)             $(7,561)
   Add: Fixed charges                                8,685                   10
                                        ------------------    -----------------
Adjusted Earnings                                  (43,271)              (7,551)

Fixed charges:
   Interest on indebtness                           (8,236)                 ---
   Interest capitalized                             (1,442)                 ---
   Amortization of debt issuance
      costs                                           (236)                 ---
   Interest portion of rental and lease
      expenses (1)                                    (213)                 (10)
                                        ------------------    -----------------
                                                   (10,127)                 (10)
                                        ------------------    -----------------
Deficiency of earnings available to
cover fixed charges                     $          (53,398)   $          (7,561)
                                        ------------------    -----------------
                                        ------------------    -----------------
</TABLE>
(1) The interest component of rental and lease expenses has been estimated by
taking the difference between the gross rent and lease expense and net present
value of rent and lease expense using the Company's cost of capital of 14%,
representing the coupon rate on the Company's outstanding senior discount notes.
Unassociated Document






Exhibit 10.1


 


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


 


THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (“AMENDMENT”), is made and entered into by and between Sharps Compliance Corp., having its principle office at 9220 Kirby Drive, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77054 (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and David P. Tusa (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


For and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree to amend the Executive’s original executed employment agreement, dated July 14, 2003 and amended on, (i) October 1, 2004 (effective June 21, 2004), (ii) August 19, 2005, (iii) June 14, 2010 and (iv) December 2, 2011 (effective November 17, 2011), herein defined as the “Agreement”, as follows:


 


The Base Salary referred to in Article 1.3.1 (as amended) of $10,576.93 per pay period (twenty-six pay periods per year) is hereby changed to $11,538.46.


 


IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first written below with the amended provisions noted above being effective March 1, 2012.


 







 


EXECUTIVE:


 


____________________


Executive


 


Date:           March 6, 2012


 







 


COMPANY:


 


By:           ____________________


Name:           Diana P. Diaz


 


Title:           Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


 


Date:           March 6, 2012
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 46 9 . Z EKEMI AN TYRONE DAVI S v . THE STATE.

A ju ry fo u n d Zek em i an Ty ro n e Dav i s gu i l t y o f t wo co u n ts o f ch il d m o l es t at i o n,

an d we affi rm ed h i s co n v i ct i o ns o n ap p ea l

. 1 S ee Da vi s v. S t a t e , 3 2 7 Ga. Ap p

. 7 2 9 (7 6 1 SE2 d 1 3 9 ) (2 0 1 4). Dav i s s u b s eq u en t l y fi l ed two m o t i o n s s eek in g an o u t -o f-t i m e

ap p eal . Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o ti o n s, an d Dav i s fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

.

“ A n o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal i s a ju d i ci al creat i o n t h at s erv es as t he rem e d y f o r a fru s t rat ed ri g h t o f ap p eal .” Ki l g o r e v. S t at e , 3 2 5 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 4, 8 7 5 (1 ) (7 56 SE2 d 9 ) (2 0 1 4). W h ere, as h ere, a d efen d an t h as al read y h ad a d i rect ap p eal

, h e i s n o t en t i t l ed

t o an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. See Ri ch a r d s v. S t at e , 2 7 5 Ga. 1 9 0
, 1 9 1 (5 6 3 SE2 d 8 5 6 ) (2 0 0 2) (“ [T] h ere is n o ri gh t t o d i rect l y ap p eal t h e d en i al o f a m ot i o n fo r o u t -o f-t i m e

ap p eal fi l ed b y a cri m in al d efen d an t wh os e co nv i ct i o n h as b een affi rm ed o n d i rect

ap p eal .”) (p u n ct u at io n o m i t t ed ). Acco rd in g l y , t h i s ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

1 Dav i s s u b s eq u en t ly ch al l en g ed h is s en t en ce as v o id

, an d

, i n an u n p u b l i s h ed

o p i n i o n , we v acat ed t h e s en t en ce an d rem an d ed t h e cas e fo r re-s en t en ci n g

. See Da vi s

v. S t a t e , Cas e No

. A1 7 A0 3 7 8
, d eci d ed M ay 3
, 2 01 7

. Fo l l o wi n g re-s en ten ci ng , Dav i s ap p eal ed h i s n ew s en t en ce, b u t h i s ap p eal was d i s m i s sed fo r fai l i n g t o fi l e a b ri ef. See Da vi s v. S t a t e , Cas e No

. A1 8 A1 1 6 4 , d i s m i s s ed Ap ri l 1 2 , 2 0 1 8

. June 09, 2021C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/09/2021
STATE EX REL. Arthur Ray ROBINSON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0683

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Robinson v. State, 16-0265 (La. 3/14/16), 186 So.3d 650.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4941 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4941

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility for 
   monthly stipends paid under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance 
  Program for certain members of the reserve components of the Armed 
                                Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2016

 Mr. Calvert (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Byrne, Mr. Cook, 
  Mr. Cramer, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Hunter, Mr. 
 Issa, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Mr. Jones, Mr. Joyce, Mr. McKinley, Ms. 
Pingree, and Mr. Ryan of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility for 
   monthly stipends paid under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance 
  Program for certain members of the reserve components of the Armed 
                                Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MONTHLY STIPEND FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE 
              COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 3313 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(j) Determination of Monthly Stipends During Certain Active Duty 
Service.--
            ``(1) Pro rata basis.--In any month in which an individual 
        described in paragraph (2) is performing active duty service 
        described in section 3301(1)(B) of this title, the Secretary 
        shall determine the amount of monthly stipends payable under 
        this section for such month on a pro rata basis for the period 
        of such month in which the covered individual is not performing 
        such active duty service.
            ``(2) Individual described.--An individual described in 
        this paragraph is an individual who is--
                    ``(A) a member of the reserve components of the 
                Armed Forces; and
                    ``(B) pursuing a program of education using 
                educational assistance under this chapter.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to a quarter, semester, or term, as applicable, commencing 
on or after August 1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Pages 33799-33800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Federal-State Unemployment Compensation Program: Unemployment 
Insurance Program Letters Interpreting Federal Unemployment Insurance 
Law

Correction

    In notice document 96-12751 beginning on page 25691 in the issue of 
Wednesday, May 22, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 25691, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in the 
fourth line,

[[Page 33800]]

``consistent'' should read ``inconsistent''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, the Chief Executive Officer, of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of the registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2004;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



Dated:
November 5, 2004

| |  | BY: |  | /s/DAVID B. GOULDDavid B. Gould Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10331]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: EUGENIO REYES & MAIDEILY SARAIBA CASE NUMBER:20-13223-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for June 23, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the June 23, 2020

hearing were due as of June 5, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

2AP @ ECF#29

Serviced 21 days prior: YES DE#30 (5/18)

If counsel for the debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service and agrees on the record:

If motion to value granted, Confirm 2AP

Case 20-13223-AJC Doc 35 Filed 06/16/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 84 (Tuesday, April 30, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 19117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30430]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 148, 268 and 403

[EPA # 530-Z-96-002; FRL-5452-7]
RIN 2050-AD38


Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III -- Decharacterized 
Wastewaters, Carbamate Wastes, and Spent Potliners

Correction

    In rule document 96-8249 beginning on page 15660 in the issue of 
Monday, April 8, 1996 make the following correction:
    On page 15660, in the third column, under EFFECTIVE DATE ``April 5, 
1996'' should read ``April 8, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Jakeilah WEEKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of mandamus is denied.
H. R. 4904 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to issue a directive 

on the management of software licenses, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Making Electronic Government 

Accountable By Yielding Tangible Efficiencies Act of 2016’’ or the 

‘‘MEGABYTE Act of 2016’’. 

SEC. 2. OMB DIRECTIVE ON MANAGEMENT OF SOFTWARE LICENSES. 

(a) DEFINITION.—In this section— 

(1) the term ‘‘Director’’ means the Director of the Office 

of Management and Budget; and 

(2) the term ‘‘executive agency’’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 105 of title 5, United States Code. 

(b) OMB DIRECTIVE.—The Director shall issue a directive to 

require the Chief Information Officer of each executive agency to 

develop a comprehensive software licensing policy, which shall— 

(1) identify clear roles, responsibilities, and central oversight authority within the executive agency for managing enterprise software license agreements and commercial software 

licenses; and 

(2) require the Chief Information Officer of each executive 

agency to— 

(A) establish a comprehensive inventory, including 80 

percent of software license spending and enterprise licenses 

in the executive agency, by identifying and collecting 

information about software license agreements using automated discovery and inventory tools; 

(B) regularly track and maintain software licenses to 

assist the executive agency in implementing decisions 

throughout the software license management life cycle; 

(C) analyze software usage and other data to make 

cost-effective decisions; 

(D) provide training relevant to software license 

management; 

(E) establish goals and objectives of the software license 

management program of the executive agency; and 

(F) consider the software license management life cycle 

phases, including the requisition, reception, deployment 

and maintenance, retirement, and disposal phases, to 

implement effective decisionmaking and incorporate 

existing standards, processes, and metrics. 
H. R. 4904—2 

(c) REPORT ON SOFTWARE LICENSE MANAGEMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, and in each 

of the following 5 fiscal years, the Chief Information Officer 

of each executive agency shall submit to the Director a report 

on the financial savings or avoidance of spending that resulted 

from improved software license management. 

(2) AVAILABILITY.—The Director shall make each report 

submitted under paragraph (1) publically available. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Is reduced benthic flux related to the Diporeia decline? Analysis of spring blooms and whiting events in Lake Ontario      

      October 29, 2013    

Benthic monitoring by USGS off the southern shore of Lake Ontario from October 1993 to October 1995 provides a detailed view of the early stages of the decline of the native amphipod Diporeia. A loss of the 1994 and 1995 year classes of Diporeia preceded the disappearance of the native amphipod at sites near Oswego and Rochester at depths from 55 to 130 m. In succeeding years, Diporeia populations continued to decline in Lake Ontario and were nearly extirpated by 2008. Explanations for Diporeia 's decline in the Great Lakes include several hypotheses often linked to the introduction and expansion of exotic zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena sp.). We compare the timeline of the Diporeia decline in Lake Ontario with trends in two sources of organic matter to the sediments — spring diatom blooms and late summer whiting events. The 1994–95 decline of Diporeia coincided with localized dreissenid effects on phytoplankton in the nearshore and a year (April 1994 to May 1995) of decreased flux of organic carbon recorded by sediment traps moored offshore of Oswego. Later declines of profundal (> 90 m) Diporeia populations in 2003 were poorly associated with trends in spring algal blooms and late summer whiting events.Lake Ontario/Diporeia/Dreissena/remote sensing.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Great Lakes Science Center          

1451 Green RoadAnn Arbor, MI48105United States

734-994-3331

734-994-8780

### Explore Search

                  - Lake Ontario

View All **
Jibri T. ARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1275

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael L. BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Serdarus M. SCOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2018

Serdarus M. Scott, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*292Petitioner's response to order for supplemental appendix, filed June 7, 2018, is treated as an amended petition for belated appeal and is denied on the merits.

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Ronald A. Waldorf, Acting Chief Financial Officer of AcuNetx, Inc. (the
"COMPANY"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2008 (the "REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
March 31, 2008.

DATE: MAY 15, 2008

                                          /s/ RONALD A. WALDORF
                                          ---------------------
                                              RONALD A. WALDORF
                                              ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
NEE-12.31.2011-Ex 10.ll






Exhibit 10(ll)


AMENDMENT 2
TO THE
NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




Section 3.02(b)(1)(iii) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor:


“(iii) Company Stock Fund.  A Participant may allocate deferred amounts to an investment fund that tracks, or invests primarily in, the Common Stock of the Company (a "Company Stock Fund").  If a Participant allocated deferred amounts to the Company Stock Fund, such amounts shall initially be credited to a stable value investment fund designated by the Administrator (the "Interim Investment Fund"). On, or as soon as reasonably practicable after, the date on which a cash dividend is paid to holders of Common Stock (the “Dividend Payment Date"), all amounts credited to such Interim Investment Fund shall be transferred to the Company Stock Fund in the Participant's Investment Account.  ”




	
			
	 
	 
	NEXTERA ENERGY, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Shaun J. Francis

	 
	 
	Shaun J. Francis

	 
	 
	Executive Vice President,

	 
	 
	Human Resources