alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4794 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rollovers between 

529 programs and ABLE accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Mr. CRENSHAW (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, 

and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow 

rollovers between 529 programs and ABLE accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ABLE Financial Plan5 ning Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ROLLOVERS TO ABLE PROGRAMS FROM 529 PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 529(c)(3)(C) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subclause (I), by striking the period 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4794 IH

1 at the end of subclause (II) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by 

2 adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(III) to an ABLE account (as 

4 defined in section 529A(e)(6)) of the 

5 designated beneficiary or a member of 

6 the family of the designated bene7 ficiary. 

8 Subclause (III) shall not apply to so much 

9 of a distribution which, when added to all 

10 other contributions made to the ABLE ac11 count for the taxable year, exceeds the lim12 itation under section 529A(b)(2)(B).’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of 

15 the enactment of this Act. 

16 SEC. 3. ROLLOVERS TO 529 PROGRAMS FROM ABLE AC17 COUNTS. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 

19 529A(c)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

20 amended— 

21 (1) by striking ‘‘such payment or distribution, 

22 into another’’ and inserting ‘‘such payment or dis23 tribution—’’ 

24 ‘‘(I) into another’’, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4794 IH

1 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert2 ing ‘‘, or’’, and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

4 clause: 

5 ‘‘(II) to a qualified tuition pro6 gram (as defined in section 529(b)) 

7 for the benefit of the same designated 

8 beneficiary or a member of the family 

9 of such designated beneficiary.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21
                            ----------
                  Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                 ------------------------------


RAHX, Inc, a Nevada Corporation, and a majority-owned
subsidiary (1)

RRUN Labs Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, and a
wholly-owned
subsidiary (2)

RVNI Management Ltd. a British Columbia Corporation, and a
wholly-owned subsidiary (3)


-------------------------------------------------------------

(1) RAHX, Inc. was incorporated in 2000 and was a majority-
owned company of RRUN Ventures Inc., and therefore became a
subsidiary of RRUN Ventures Network Inc. upon approval of the
merger in August, 2001.

(2) RRUN Labs Incorporated was incorporated in September,
2001.

(3) RVNI Management Ltd. was incorporated in June, 2002.
# L_2005053EN.01007801.xml

| 26.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 53/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 53/78

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1582/2004 of 8 September 2004 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1470/2001 on imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in the People’s Republic of China by imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) consigned from Vietnam, Pakistan or the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Vietnam, Pakistan or the Philippines or not, and making such imports subject to registration

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 289 of 10 September 2004
  )

On page 56, in the first paragraph of Article 1:

for:

‘(TARIC code 85393190*91)’,

read:

‘(TARIC code 85393190*92)’.

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of inVentiv Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
S. Bassin, Chief Financial Officer of inVentiv, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of inVentiv.





/s/ DAVID S.BASSINDavid
      S. Bassin
              Chief
      Financial Officer





DATE:
February 24, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
inVentiv Health, Inc. and will be retained by inVentiv Health, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10205]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 5517]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service


Request for Proposals (RFP): Fund for Rural America Program

Correction

    In notice document 97-2273, beginning on page 4382, in the issue of 
January 29, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 4385, in the first column, in C. Focus of the Program, 
in the first paragraph, in the second line, ``Care'' should read 
``Core''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in 1. The Fund Core 
Initiative, in the last line of the second paragraph, ``703(c)(2)(A))'' 
should read ``793(c)(2)(A))''
    3. On the same page, in the second column, in (2) Environomental 
stewardship, in the second paragraph, in the fourth line, ``Adoptive'' 
should read ``Adaptive''.
    4. On the same page, in the fifth example in (2) Environmental 
stewardship, in the third column, in the first line, ``to line'' should 
read ''to link''.
    5. On page 4388, in E. Funding Mechanisms, in the first paragraph, 
in the third line ``REFP'' should read ``RFP''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6309

ADRIAN MARION SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States 

of America; STATE OF GEORGIA CIRCUIT JUDGE ANNIS; BILL 

BYARS, State of South Carolina SCDC Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief 

District Judge. (3:11-cv-00748-MBS)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 31, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Marion Smith, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Marion Smith appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Smith v. Holder, No. 3:11-cv-00748-MBS (D.S.C. filed Jan. 26, 

2012; entered Jan. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4985 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act to protect 
          classified information in Federal court challenges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kingpin Designation Improvement Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION IN FEDERAL COURT 
              CHALLENGES RELATING TO DESIGNATIONS UNDER THE NARCOTICS 
              KINGPIN DESIGNATION ACT.

    Section 804 of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (21 
U.S.C. 1903) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Protection of Classified Information in Federal Court 
Challenges Relating to Designations.--In any judicial review of a 
determination made under this section, if the determination was based 
on classified information (as defined in section 1(a) of the Classified 
Information Procedures Act) such information may be submitted to the 
reviewing court ex parte and in camera. This subsection does not confer 
or imply any right to judicial review.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 10, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act to protect 
          classified information in Federal court challenges.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31,
2004 (the "Report"), I, David Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 2, 2005       /s/ David Wilson
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David Wilson
                              Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                              Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 207 (Thursday, October 24, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 55188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-41024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Exchanges and Training Program With Russia, Ukraine, and 
Uzbekistan

Correction

    In notice document 96-26378 appearing on page 54261 in the issue of 
Thursday, October 17, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 54261, in the second column, in the ninth line from the 
bottom, ``twenty-five'' should read ``twenty''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# p

. L^-V*^<^\ ^

, ,'v-\ i iV.Ci'li.'-' ' Pinnacl e Airline s Corp . "-' •' •''••'•••Ori ' i\ \

'0'^ ' ^^^^ Noncorna h Blvd . -.V,--|"/^nrb- M r'v'" " Suit e 10 0 , _,-. rI JiCi.r.M^.'.'.. ' MempNs.T N 3813 2 90t-348-410 0

. . - 1 -—

i I . h n PNCL.co m 

# PINNACL E A l RLINE S COR R Marc h 15,201 1 Mr . Denni s DeVan y Chief , EA S & Domesti cAnalysi s Divisio n Offic e ofAviatio n Analysi s Departmen t ofTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Re : HA S a t Maso n City , l A Docke t OST-2001-1068 4 Dea rMr . DeVany : T o th e exten t necessary . Pinnacl e Airlines , Inc . ("Pinnacle" ) an d Mesab a Aviation , Inc. , d/b/ a Mesab a Airlines ("Mesaba" ) jointl yreques t tha t eithe rcarrie rb e deeme d eligibl e t o receiv e th e EA S compensatio n establishe d byOrde r2010-5-18 . Pinnacl e an d Mesab a ar e nowbot h wholl y owne d subsidiarie s ofth e holdin g corporation , Pinnacl e Airlines , Corp . Bot h carrier s currentl y operat e an d wil l continu e t o operat e a s "Delt a Connection " carriers . Flight s operate d b yMesab a woul d us e Saa b 34 0 aircraft , an d flight s operate d byPinnacl e woul d us e 5 0 sea t CRJ20 0 Regiona l Je t Aircraft . Mesab a an d Pinnacl e see k t o provid e EA S sen^ice o n a n interi m basi s pursuan t t o th e rate s establishe d b yOrde r2010-5-18 , an d withou t prejudic e t o thei rabilit yt o see k ne wEA S rate s fo rCRJ20 0 servic e onc e th e longe rter m flee t plan s ofth e respectiv e carrier s ar e established . Th e communit yofMaso n City , l Aha s authorize d Mesab a an d Pinnacl e t o stat e o n it s behal f tha t th e communit ysupport s thi s request . Sincerely , D . Phili p Ree d / Vic e Presiden t / Networ k Schedulin g an d Operation s Analytic s Pinnacl e Airlines , Corp . cc : Maximillia n Shemesh , Genera l Counsel , Mesab a Airlines Eri cBookmeyer , Mayo rMaso n Cit yIow a Pamel a Osgood , Airport Manager , Maso n CityMunicipa l Airport
Case 20-11487-RAM Doc 19 Filed 03/06/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-11487-RAM Doc 19 Filed 03/06/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON • 

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 

) No. 76133-1 

v. 

Respondent, ) 

) 

) 

DIVISION ONE 

) UNPUBLISHED OPINION (71 

BRIAN DANSIE, 

Appellant. 

) 

) 

) APR 1 7 2017 FILED: :La 

rrl 

—n 

> 

) 

co, m 

PER CURIAM. - Petitioner Brian Dansie has filed a motion for 

c? 

r\,) discretionary review of trial court orders denying his motion to vacate the record 

of his criminal conviction. The State of Washington filed a motion to concede 

error and remand for a new hearing. Dansie filed an answer to the State's 

motion, and the State has filed a reply. 

The motion for discretionary review is granted. We also accept the State's 

concession of error in part, accelerate review, and remand. On remand, the trial 

court is directed to clarify on the record the "good cause" reason for denying the 

motion to vacate under RCW 9.94A.640. We decline Dansie's request that the 

matter be remanded for a new hearing before a different judge. 

Remanded for further proceedings. 

For the Court:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: CASE NO.: 20-11783-BKC-PGH

Dianne P. Ramlal,

CHAPTER 13

 Debtor.

 /

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY (ECF NO. 18) FOR 

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

THIS CASE came before the Court for hearing on March 19, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. 

on the Creditor Jonathan White’s (the “Creditor”) Motion for Relief from Stay (the 

“Motion”). Neither the Creditor nor Creditor’s counsel appeared at the hearing.

As a result, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice

for failure to prosecute. 

###

Copies Furnished To:

Paul G. Hyman, Jr.,Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 23, 2020.

Case 20-11783-PGH Doc 25 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Debtor

Debtor’s counsel

Creditor

Creditor’s counsel

Trustee

AUST

Case 20-11783-PGH Doc 25 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology, 1922      

      January 1, 1923    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70130]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 611, 675 and 676

[Docket No. 941242-4342; I.D. 111494A]


Foreign Fishing; Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and 
Aleutian Islands; Limited Access Management of Federal Fisheries In and 
Off of Alaska

Correction

    In proposed rule document 94-30727 beginning on page 64383 in the 
issue of Wednesday, December 14, 1994 make the following correction:
    On page 64387, in Table 2, under the Non-roe season heading, in the 
60% column, in the Offshore and Total entries for the Aleutian Islands 
and in all entries for Bogoslof ``Do.'' should read ``Remainder''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit
12.4  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002   I, Peter
E. Lynch, as Chief Financial Officer of eircom Group
plc (registrant), and eircom Funding,
Valentia Telecommunications and eircom Limited
(additional registrants) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)  
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31
March 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and  (2)  
the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant and the additional registrants.  By:Peter E. LynchChief Financial OfficerDate:
  23/7/04
  
  
  eircom Group
  plc   A signed original copy of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to eircom Group plc and will be retained by eircom Group plc and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 101 (Tuesday, May 27, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-50527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 5, 26, 27, 95, 100, 110, 130, 136, 138, 140, 151, 153, 
177

46 CFR Part 2

[CGD 96-052]
RIN 2105-AC63


Civil Money Penalties Inflation Adjustments

Correction

    In rule document 97-8781 beginning on page 16695 in the issue of 
Tuesday, April 8, 1997 make the following corrrections:
    (1) On page 16696, in Table A -- SUMMARY OF CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY 
INFLATION ADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS, under the ``U.S. Code citation'' 
heading, in the last entry ``33 U.S.C 1319(a)(2)(A)'' should read ``33 
U.S.C 1319(g)(2)(A)''.
    (2) On page 16697, also in Table A, under the same heading, in the 
fifth entry ``33 U.S.C. 3121(b)(6)(B)(i)'' should read ``33 U.S.C. 
1321(b)(6)(B)(i)''.

PART 140--[CORRECTED]

    (3) On page 16703, in the second column, in the authority citation 
for Part 140, in the first line ``42 U.S.C. 1333, 1348, 1350'' should 
read ``43 U.S.C. 1333, 1348, 1350''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION 

Appellate case name: Rescue Concepts, Inc. v. HouReal Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-20-00553-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-71749

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: September 12, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellee/Cross-Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

The En Banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, 

Hightower, Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: November 22, 2022
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 1995 / Corrections 7051

paragraph, in the entry entitled ‘‘NEMA

WC 30, Color Coding of Wires and

Cables, 1976’’, at the end of the entry

the number ‘‘11.70-3(a).’’ should read

‘‘111.70-3(a).’’.

6. On the same page, in the same

column, in the fourth paragraph, in the

entry entitled ‘‘NFPA 70, The National

Electrical Code, 1996’’, at the end of the

entry, in the eighth line of the numbers

listed, ‘‘111.107(a)’’ should read

‘‘111.107-1(a)’’.

§111.60-2 [Corrected]

7. On page 4153, in the first column,

in §111.60-2, in the first paragraph, in

the seventh line, ‘‘cable’s’’ should read

‘‘cables,’’.

§111.60-4 [Corrected]

8. On the same page, in the second

column, in §111.60-4 (b), in the third

line, ‘‘(0.332)’’ should read ‘‘(0.33

mm2)’’.

§111.60-23 [Corrected]

9. On the same page, in the 3d

column, in §111.60-23 (a)(1), in the 12th

line, ‘‘pits,’’ should read ‘‘ mud pits,’’.

§111.105-17 [Corrected]

10. On page 4157, in the third

column, in §111.105-17 (a), in the first

line from the top, after the word ‘‘all’’

insert ‘‘hazardous’’.

§111.105-29 [Corrected]

11. On the same page, in the same

column, in §111.105-29 (c), in the fifth

line, ‘‘§111.105-31(1).’’ should read

‘‘111.105-31(l).’’.

§112.39-1 [Corrected]

12. On page 4160, in the first column,

in the first line, paragraph ‘‘115’’ should

read ‘‘155’’.

§112.43-3 [Corrected]

13. On the same page, in the same

column, in the amendment to remove

§112.43-3, ‘‘11243-3’’ should read

‘‘112.43-3’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ANM-16]

Amendment of Class E Airspace;

Ogden, UT

Correction

In rule document 96–850 beginning

on page 1706 in the issue of Tuesday,

January 23, 1996, make the following

corrections:

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

On page 1707, in the 1st column, in

§ 71.1:

1. In the 13th line, ‘‘C-’’ should read

‘‘V-’’.

2. Lines 7 and 8 from the bottom

should read ‘‘101, southeast along V-101

to V-288, west along V-288 to V-484,’’.

3. In the 2d line from the bottom,

‘‘areas’’ should read ‘‘area’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[AD–FRL–5272–1]

RIN 2060–AD–94

National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Petroleum

Refineries

Correction

In rule document 95–20252 beginning

on page 43244 in the issue of Friday,

August 18, 1995, make the following

corrections:

§ 63.640 [Corrected]

1. On page 43261, in the third

column, in § 63.640(h)(5)(iii), in the

second and third lines, ‘‘June 18, 2001’’

should read ‘‘February 18, 2001’’.

§ 63.642 [Corrected]

2. On page 43267, in the first column,

in § 63.642(g), the equation should read

as follows:

EA = 0.02ΣEPV1 + ΣEPV2 + 0.05ΣES1 +

ΣES2 + ΣEGLR1C + ΣEGLR2 +

(R)ΣEMV1 + ΣEMV2 + ΣEWW1C +

ΣEWW2

§ 63.652 [Corrected]

3. On page 43283, in § 63.652(j)(1)(ii),

the equation should read as follows:

Percent reduction =

EB − ( ) ×

×

E P

P

E

pp B

pp

B

100%

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Leslie SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 30, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*