alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of CompleTel Europe N.V.

Name                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-----                              -----------------------------

CompleTel ECC B.V.                  The Netherlands

CompleTel Holding I B.V.            The Netherlands

CompleTel Holding II B.V.           The Netherlands

CompleTel Escrow B.V.               The Netherlands

CompleTel B.V.                      The Netherlands

CompleTel Headquarters
Europe SAS (formerly,
CompleTel Services SAS)             France

CompleTel SAS                       France

Access et Solutions
Internet S.A.R.L.                   France

CompleTel GmbH                      Germany

OK Kable GmbH                       Germany

iPcenta Germany GmbH                Germany

CompleTel U.K. Limited              United Kingdom

iPcenta Limited
(formerly, Web International
Network Limited)                    United Kingdom

CompleTel SPC                       United Kingdom
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1605

WAYNE CURTIS SIRON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (11208-04)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 19, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Curtis Siron, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor,

Assistant Attorney General, Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Randolph L.

Hutter, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

WASHINGTON, D.C.; Donald L. Korb, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Curtis Siron appeals from the tax court’s order

upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in

Siron’s 1998 income taxes and assessing penalties. We have

reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

tax court. Siron v. Comm’r., Tax Ct. No. 11208-04 (U.S. Tax Ct.

Apr. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baynon International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Pasquale Catizone, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Pasquale Catizone
-----------------------------
Pasquale Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

March 19, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baynon International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel Generelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

March 19, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 195 (Monday, October 7, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 52497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-51007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency for International Development

48 CFR Part 722

[AIDAR Notice 96-1]
RIN 0412-AA29


Miscellaneous Amendments to Acquisition Regulations; Corrections

Correction

    In rule document 96-25059 beginning on page 51234 in the issue of 
Tuesday, October 1, 1996, make the following correction:


722.103  [Corrected]

    On page 51235, in the first column, in amendatory instruction 26 to 
section 722.103, in the third line, insert ``722.103-71 and 722.103-72 
are redesignated as'' after ``Section''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

IN RE: 

ILEANA RAMUDO-TOWNSEND 

AKA ILEANA RAMUDO 

AKA ILEANA TOWNSEND, 

DEBTOR. 

_________________________________________/ 

CASE NO.: 19-26381-SMG 

CHAPTER 13

PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO MOTION TO VALUE 

Movant, Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC (the “Movant”), by and through counsel, 

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506, responds in opposition to the Debtor’s Motion to Value and 

Determine Secured Status of Lien on Personal Property (Doc. No. 23) (the “Motion”) and states: 

1. On October 21, 2016, the Debtor entered into a retail installment contract (the

“Contract”) with Bridgecrest for the purchase of a 2006 Lexus IS 250 (the “Vehicle”), with VIN 

ending in 0888. The Vehicle is for the personal use of the Debtor. 

2. The Contract (pursuant to which Debtor made a down payment of $1,000.00)

provides for monthly payments in the amount of $511.75 commencing on November 16, 2016, 

with a final payment of $511.51 on August 16, 2022. See Contract attached. 

3. On January 28, 2020, Bridgecrest filed its Proof of Claim (Claim #2). The secured

amount of the claim is shown as $12,708.60. 

4. On January 24, 2020, Debtor filed a Motion to Value (DE 23) by which Debtor

seeks an order from this Court valuing the secured claim of Bridgecrest at $3,500.00. The 

Debtor’s Motion must be denied. 

5. The Debtor’s Motion seeks to value the Personal Property at less than the total

amount of the Movant’s claim. 

Case 19-26381-SMG Doc 38 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 3
6. The valuation proposed in the Debtor’s Motion does not appear to accurately

reflect the true market value of the Property. The NADAguides Value Report as of February 21, 

2020 shows a market value of $5,875.00 for the Vehicle. See Report attached. 

7. Therefore, the Movant opposes the Debtor’s Motion.

WHEREFORE, the Movant respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order denying 

the Debtor’s Motion, or in the alternative, set the Debtor’s Motion for an evidentiary hearing, 

and grant any other relief deemed just and proper. 

Respectfully submitted by, 

VAN NESS LAW FIRM, PLC 

1239 E. Newport Center Drive, Suite 110 

Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 

Phone (954) 571-2031 

/s/ Maya Rubinov 

Maya Rubinov, Esquire 

Florida Bar No.: 99986 

bankruptcy@vanlawfl.com 

Case 19-26381-SMG Doc 38 Filed 02/26/20 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was served on February 25, 2020 by 

CM/ECF electronic filing to all registered users in this matter and by U.S. Mail to the nonregistered user or users below. 

Respectfully submitted by, 

VAN NESS LAW FIRM, PLC 

1239 E. Newport Center Drive, Suite 110 

Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 

Phone (954) 571-2031 

/s/ Maya Rubinov 

Maya Rubinov, Esquire 

Florida Bar No.: 99986 

bankruptcy@vanlawfl.com 

MAILING MATRIX 

ILEANA RAMUDO-TOWNSEND 

1521 SW 186TH AVE 

PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33029-6146 

AKA ILEANA RAMUDO 

AKA ILEANA TOWNSEND 

Case 19-26381-SMG Doc 38 Filed 02/26/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Predictive accuracy of a ground-water model--Lessons from a postaudit      

      March 1, 1986    

Hydrogeologic studies commonly include the development, calibration, and application of a deterministic simulation model. To help assess the value of using such models to make predictions, a postaudit was conducted on a previously studied area in the Salt River and lower Santa Cruz River basins in central Arizona. A deterministic, distributed-parameter model of the ground-water system in these alluvial basins was calibrated by Anderson (1968) using about 40 years of data (1923–64). The calibrated model was then used to predict future water-level changes during the next 10 years (1965–74). Examination of actual water-level changes in 77 wells from 1965–74 indicates a poor correlation between observed and predicted water-level changes. The differences have a mean of 73 ft that is, predicted declines consistently exceeded those observed and a standard deviation of 47 ft. The bias in the predicted water-level change can be accounted for by the large error in the assumed total pumpage during the prediction period. However, the spatial distribution of errors in predicted water-level change does not correlate with the spatial distribution of errors in pumpage. Consequently, the lack of precision probably is not related only to errors in assumed pumpage, but may indicate the presence of other sources of error in the model, such as the two-dimensional representation of a three-dimensional problem or the lack of consideration of land-subsidence processes. This type of postaudit is a valuable method of verifying a model, and an evaluation of predictive errors can provide an increased understanding of the system and aid in assessing the value of undertaking development of a revised model.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Salt River basin
                  -  Lower Santa Cruz River basins
                  - Arizona

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Synchroneity of the K-T oceanic mass extinction and meteorite impact: Blake Nose, western North Atlantic      

      January 1, 1999    

A 10-cm-thick layer of green spherules occurs precisely at the biostratigraphic boundary between the Cretaceous and Paleogene (K-T boundary) at Ocean Drilling Program Site 1049 (lat 30°08′N, long 76°06′W). The spherulitic layer contains abundant rock fragments (chalk, limestone, dolomite, chert, mica books, and schist) as well as shocked quartz, abundant large Cretaceous planktic foraminifera, and rounded clasts of clay as long as 4 mm interpreted as altered tektite glass probably derived from the Chicxulub impact structure. Most of the Cretaceous foraminifera present above the spherule layer are not survivors since small specimens are conspicuously rare compared to large individuals. Instead, the Cretaceous taxa in Paleocene sediments are thought to be reworked. The first Paleocene planktic foraminifera and calcareous nannofossil species are recorded immediately above the spherule bed, the upper part of which contains an iridium anomaly. Hence, deposition of the impact ejecta exactly coincided with the biostratigraphic K-T boundary and demonstrates that the impact event was synchronous with the evolutionary turnover in the oceans. These results are consistent with a reanalysis of the biostratigraphy of the K-T boundary stratotype, which argues that shallow-marine K-T boundary sections are not biostratigraphically more complete than deep-sea K-T boundary sites.

## Citation Information
Leigh Ann TURAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1926

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-11218]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Postsecondary Education

34 CFR Part 682




Federal Family Education Loan Program eligible borrowers

CFR Correction

    In Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 400 to end, 
revised as of July 1, 1995, on page 680, second column, the text 
designated as Sec. 682.201 (a)(8) is correctly designated as 
Sec. 682.201 (b)(8) and should appear on page 681, in the second column 
before paragraph (c).

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32

Section 32 Certification

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:    June 21, 2004

By:       /s/  Robert J. Blagman
          --------------------------
          Robert J. Blagman
          Chief Executive Officer


                                       20
Implement Loads

NPDES Permitting &

Nonpoint Source Controls

Develop Total Maximum

Daily Loads

List Impaired Waterbodies

303(d) List

Monitoring and Assess Waterbodies

Set Water Quality Standards

Adopt Verified List

Adopt Basin Management 

Action Plan

Florida Watershed Restoration Act

Adopt TMDL in Rule

Statutory Overview

Clean Water Act
Florida W Florida Watershed Restoration Act: Agricultur tion Act: Agriculture

• Authorizes FDACS to 

Develop and Adopt BMPs 

to Address Agricultural 

Non-Point Sources

• Implementation Provides 

“Presumption of 

Compliance” with State

Water Quality Standards

• Requires Notice of Intent 

(NOI) to FDACS to Enroll 

Operation

• Manual specifies recordkeeping requirements 

• Authorizes FDACS to 

Develop and Adopt BMPs 

to Address Agricultural 

Non-Point Sources

• Implementation Provides 

“Presumption of 

Compliance” with State

Water Quality Standards

• Requires Notice of Intent 

(NOI) to FDACS to Enroll 

Operation

• Manual specifies recordkeeping requirements 

Phosphorus Source Controls

BMP Implementation

Source: 2010 South Florida

Environmental Report (Draft)
Modified Hydrology
State agency-buyers pay rancher-sellers for 

providing documented water and phosphorusretention services over a fixed-term contract. 

• Competitive contract process. 

• State agencies request proposals for 

providing desired services.

• Projects are selected based on the best 

opportunity for providing desired outcomes. 

State agency-buyers pay rancher-sellers for 

providing documented water and phosphorusretention services over a fixed-term contract. 

• Competitive contract process. 

• State agencies request proposals for 

providing desired services.

• Projects are selected based on the best 

opportunity for providing desired outcomes. 
Accounting for Anthropogenic Land Uses Land Uses

Source: 2010

South Florida

Environmental

Report (Draft)
Challenges

Lake Criteria

IPV and/or DPV

• Layered Numeric Nutrient Criteria

• Stream Criteria (IPV)

• Lake Criteria

• Stream Criteria (DPV)

• Permitting Regional Treatment

• Industrial Wastewater?

• Limits of 

Technology
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, David Natan, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-K of SFBC International, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 15, 2004

/s/ DAVIDNATAN

Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           In situ 10Be-26Al exposure ages at Meteor Crater, Arizona      

      January 1, 1991    

A new method of dating the surface exposure of rocks from in situ production of 10Be and 26Al has been applied to determine the age of Meteor Crater, Arizona. A lower bound on the crater age of 49,200 ± 1,700 years has been obtained by this method.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - meteor crater
                  - Arizona

View All **
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
      undersigned, Ofer Segev, Chief Financial Officer of Ness Technologies, Inc.,
      a
      Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge,
      that:





The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of the
      Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in
      the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                March 17, 2008
            /s/Ofer
                SegevOfer
                SegevChief
                Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Petty Officer 
           1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2016

 Mr. Ashford (for himself, Mr. Fortenberry, and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Petty Officer 
           1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS CALEB A. NELSON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Petty Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Petty 
Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```