alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005333EN.01005501.xml

| 20.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/55

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 9 December 2005

on the approval of the volume of coin issuance in 2006

(ECB/2005/14)

(2005/918/EC)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular to Article 106(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States that have adopted the euro (the participating Member States). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States that have adopted the euro (the participating Member States).

| (2) | The participating Member States have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2006, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The participating Member States have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2006, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Approval of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2006

The ECB hereby approves the volume of coins to be issued by the participating Member States in 2006 as described in the following table:

| (EUR million) |
| --- |
| | Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins (not intended for circulation) in 2006 |
| Belgium | 145,5 |
| Germany | 500,0 |
| Greece | 71,4 |
| Spain | 625,0 |
| France | 362,0 |
| Ireland | 76,0 |
| Italy | 772,4 |
| Luxembourg | 45,0 |
| Netherlands | 60,0 |
| Austria | 177,0 |
| Portugal | 150,0 |
| Finland | 60,0 |

(EUR million)

Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins (not intended for circulation) in 2006

Belgium

145,5

Germany

500,0

Greece

71,4

Spain

625,0

France

362,0

Ireland

76,0

Italy

772,4

Luxembourg

45,0

Netherlands

60,0

Austria

177,0

Portugal

150,0

Finland

60,0

Article 2

Final provision

This Decision is addressed to the participating Member States.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 9 December 2005.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Western Area Power Administration


Transmission and Ancillary Services Rates, Pick-Sloan Missouri 
Basin, Eastern Division

Correction

    In notice document 97-24346 beginning on page 48272, in the issue 
of Monday, September 15, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 48272, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
fourth line, ``November 14, 1997'' should read ``December 15, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Oilsands
Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2009, the
undersigned Christopher H. Hopkins, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








December
      7, 2009/s/
      Christopher H. HopkinsChristopher
      H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer












25
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Regional geology and tectonics      

      November 1, 2017    

This chapter describes the regional geology and tectonic origins of the major geologic units for the Northern Cordillera. The goals of the chapter are to: (1) provide a summary and regional overview of this vast region that contains a complicated geologic history; and (2) describe the major geologic units and tectonic events that cover a broad geologic time span from the Proterozoic to the Holocene (Recent).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Warren  J Nokleberg

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

nokleberg@usgs.gov

650-439-2532

## Related Content

#### Warren  J Nokleberg

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

nokleberg@usgs.gov

650-439-2532

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Surface electric fields for North America during historical geomagnetic storms      

      August 19, 2013    

To better understand the impact of geomagnetic disturbances on the electric grid, we recreate surface electric fields from two historical geomagnetic storms—the 1989 “Quebec” storm and the 2003 “Halloween” storms. Using the Spherical Elementary Current Systems method, we interpolate sparsely distributed magnetometer data across North America. We find good agreement between the measured and interpolated data, with larger RMS deviations at higher latitudes corresponding to larger magnetic field variations. The interpolated magnetic field data are combined with surface impedances for 25 unique physiographic regions from the United States Geological Survey and literature to estimate the horizontal, orthogonal surface electric fields in 1 min time steps. The induced horizontal electric field strongly depends on the local surface impedance, resulting in surprisingly strong electric field amplitudes along the Atlantic and Gulf Coast. The relative peak electric field amplitude of each physiographic region, normalized to the value in the Interior Plains region, varies by a factor of 2 for different input magnetic field time series. The order of peak electric field amplitudes (largest to smallest), however, does not depend much on the input. These results suggest that regions at lower magnetic latitudes with high ground resistivities are also at risk from the effect of geomagnetically induced currents. The historical electric field time series are useful for estimating the flow of the induced currents through long transmission lines to study power flow and grid stability during geomagnetic disturbances.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earthquake Hazards Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

twoods@usgs.gov

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20402]


      
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[OR64-7279a, OR36-1-6298a, OR46-1-6802a; FRL-5696-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation 
of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Oregon

Correction

    In final rule document 97-5645 beginning on page 10457 in the issue 
of Friday, March 7, 1997 make the following correction:
    On page 10462, in the first column, under ``E. Petitions for 
Judicial Review'', in the fifth line ``[insert date 60 days from date 
of publication in the Federal Register]'' should be replaced by ``May 
6, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EX-10.67



 Exhibit 10.67 
 ANNUAL BASE SALARIES APPROVED FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 OF

 WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. 

Effective June 28, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) approved base salary increases for the following executive officers of the Registrant who either are named executive officers of the Registrant for purposes of the disclosure included in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement
for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 29, 2016 and/or will be named executive officers of the Registrant for purposes of the disclosure to be included in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on September 27, 2017. All base salary increases will become effective August 27, 2017. 
  

					
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	Base Salary	 
	 John P. McConnell

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant
	  	 $
	 663,063
	  

		
	 Mark A. Russell

President and Chief Operating Officer of the Registrant
	  	 $
	 557,333
	  

		
	 B. Andrew Rose

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
	  	 $
	 503,773
	  

		
	 Geoffrey G. Gilmore

President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation
	  	 $
	 504,000
	  

		
	 Virgil L. Winland

Senior Vice President-Manufacturing of the Registrant
	  	 $
	 375,920
	  

		
	 John G. Lamprinakos

President, The Worthington Steel Company
	  	 $
	 375,000
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

Case No.: 20-18973-SMG

GECKO PARKS, LLC

Debtor-in-Possession.

/

CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 1007(a) and Bankruptcy Rule 7007.1, and Local Rules 1007-

1, 2003-2, 7007.1-1 and 9014-1(B), GECKO PARKS, LLC., a (check one):

[X] Corporate Debtor

[ ] Party to an adversary proceeding

[ ] Party to a contested matter

[ ] Member of committee of creditors

makes the following disclosure(s):

All corporations, other than a governmental unit, that directly or indirectly own ten percent (10%) 

or more of any class of the corporation's equity interests are listed below:

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

OR

[ X ] There are no entities that directly or indirectly own 10% or more of any class of the 

corporation's equity interest.

Dated this 20th day of August, 2020.

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

330 N Andrews Ave., Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 765-3166

Facsimile: (954) 756-7103

Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

 By: /s/ Chad Van Horn, Esq.

Chad Van Horn, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 64500

Case 20-18973-SMG Doc 4 Filed 08/20/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2002)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 77645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X02-11219]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2002 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 77645]]

                Presidential Determination No. 03-07 of December 11, 
                2002

                
Report to the Congress Regarding Conditions in 
                Burma and U.S. Policy Toward Burma

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the requirements set forth under the 
                heading ``Policy toward Burma'' in section 570(d) of 
                the Fiscal Year 1997 Foreign Operations Appropriations 
                Act, as contained in the Omnibus Consolidated 
                Appropriations Act (Public Law 104-208), a report is 
                required every 6 months following enactment concerning:

(1)

progress toward democratization in Burma;

(2)

progress on improving the quality of life of the Burmese people, including 
progress on market reforms, living standards, labor standards, use of 
forced labor in the tourism industry, and environmental quality; and

(3)

progress made in developing a comprehensive, multilateral strategy to bring 
democracy to and improve human rights practices and the quality of life in 
Burma, including the development of a dialogue between the State Peace and 
Development Council and democratic opposition groups in Burma.

                I understand the attached report was not forwarded due 
                to an administrative error.

                You are hereby authorized and directed now to transmit 
                the attached report fulfilling the above-stated 
                requirements to the appropriate committees of the 
                Congress and to arrange for its publication in the 
                Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 11, 2002.

Billing code 4710-10-M
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Nickel-iron spherules from aouelloul glass      

      January 1, 1966    

Nickel-iron spherules, ranging from less than 0.2 to 50 microns in diameter and containing 1.7 to 9.0 percent Ni by weight, occur in glass associated with the Aouelloul crater. They occur in discrete bands of siliceous glass enriched in dissolved iron. Their discovery is significant tangible evidence that both crater and glass originated from terrestrial impact.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Surface water and climatologic data, Salt Lake County, Utah, water year 1981, with selected data for water years 1980 and 1982      

      January 1, 1983    

View Document

View Plate

This report contains precipitation, atmospheric-deposition, water- discharge and water-quality data collected in Salt Lake County as part of two investigations by the U.S. Geological Survey. The purpose of this report is to release data collected mainly during the 1981 water year. Selected data collected during the 1980 water year not previously published or revised and the 1982 water year also are included in this report.

The first investigation, which was carried out from September 1979 to August 1982, was an urban-runoff study done in cooperation with the Salt Lake County Division of Flood Control and Water Quality. The objectives of the urban-runoff study were to identify the impact of urban runoff on the quantity and quality of the water in the canals east of the Jordan River and on the major tributaries to the river.

The second investigation, which was carried out from December 1979 to September 1983, is a study of water-quality problems in the Jordan River. The study was done primarily to provide information about toxic substances, dissolved-oxygen depletion, sanitary quality, and turbidity and suspended sediment in the Jordan River. It also was funded in part by the Salt Lake County Division of Flood Control and Water Quality.

Several Salt Lake County employees assisted in the collection of water- quality samples from storm runoff. Of those employees, Lee R. Armstrong, Gilbert H. Heal, Steven J. Mitckes, and Ben Santistevan worked on a daily basis with the authors and made a significant contribution in the collection of the data contained in this report. Organizations that furnished data are acknowledged in the station descriptions in tables 1 and 4.

Information for previously published water-discharge, water-quality, atmospheric-deposition, and precipitation data for Salt Lake County are reported by Pyper and others (1981); Dustin (1977); Hely and others (1971) and references that they cited; and Feth and others (1964). Additional water- discharge and water-quality data, published annually by the U.S. Geological Survey, and climatologic data, published monthly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, are available for Salt Lake County. (See for example, U.S. Geological Survey, 1982 and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1982.)

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Vegetation of the Patuxent Research Refuge, Maryland      

      July 1, 1947    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - patuxent research refuge
                  - Maryland

View All **
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Date: 12/08/2010 04:00 PM 

 

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Review comments on Gold Mine Draft Final 

 

A few more interagency comments.

Best regards,

heidi

(See attached file: Summary of Interagency Working Comments_Gold Mines 

Final_2010_12_8.doc)
Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under EO12866 Interagency Review. 

Subject to Further Policy Review.

1. The Cost Analysis page 13 mentions an increase in electricity consumption and an 

increase in carbon generation. Can we be more specific?

2. The Cost Analysis lists the facilities by name and number, the MACT Floor document 

uses names but the preamble uses A-Z lettering. Could the preamble switch to numbers that are 

consistent with the support documents, or simply, to be most transparent use the facility names 

(at most only 9 facilities are presented in each table)? The goal is to allow a reader to crosswalk the documents.

3. MACT Floor TSD page 2 states that there are 10 facilities for carbon processes with 

mercury retorts. This is consistent with table 2 in the document. However in the preamble (table 

3) only lists 9 facilities.

4. MACT Floor TSD: Could EPA provide the number of tests used to calculate the average 

for each source in Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4?

5. What comments did EPA receive (formally or informally) regarding the cost of emissions 

reductions? In particular, on the capital cost for additional controls in the MACT Floor TSD?

6. MACT Floor TSD Page 8 mentions invalidated emissions tests from 2007 and 2008 but 

the reationale for invalidation is very vague. It would be helpful if EPA could provide more 

details on this. In addition, the preamble should then reference this discussion in the TSD.

7. MACT Floor TSD. Regarding variance calculation, could EPA provide reference for the 

adopted method, assumed distribution of the variance, etc? In particular, is the adopted method 

appropriate for small sample size (n=2 or n=10)

8. MACT Floor TSD page 13, table 5 shows results for a 70% reduction. Why 70%? Some 

text to explain this, for the beyond the floor analysis, would be helpful.
Randolph BAGGETT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Jane WEINTRAUB and Discovery Communications, Inc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0275

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation, (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank Erhartic,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify to our knowledge
and in our capacity as officers of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.
                
                /s/ Daniel JuddFrank
      Erhartic, Jr.
                
                Daniel
      JuddChief
      Executive Officer and President
                
                Chief
      Financial OfficerOctober
      8, 2009
                
                October
      8, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30601]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of United EcoEnergy Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert Hipple, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Hipple
- -------------------------------------
Robert Hipple
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-253-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Limited 
Waiver of Tariff Provisions

Correction

    In notice document 97-4680 appearing on page 8707 in the issue of 
February 26, 1997, the docket number should read as set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Order filed December 10 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00477

- CV

___________ CHRISTOPHER BRANCH , Appellant

V.

FORT BEND COUNTY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 320790434

O R D E R
No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 434th Judicial District Court informed this court that appellant had not
requested the repor ter’s record. On October 15 , 201 9 , the clerk of this court
notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not
require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this
court with proof of request record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no
reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court
will dismiss the app eal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, S p ain, and H a ssan.