alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental changes associated with urbanization in nine metropolitan areas      

      July 1, 2010    

Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates along gradients of urban intensity were investigated in nine metropolitan areas across the United States. Invertebrate assemblages in metropolitan areas where forests or shrublands were being converted to urban land were strongly related to urban intensity. In metropolitan areas where agriculture and grazing lands were being converted to urban land, invertebrate assemblages showed much weaker or nonsignificant relations with urban intensity because sites with low urban intensity were already degraded by agriculture. Ordination scores, the number of EPT taxa, and the mean pollution‐tolerance value of organisms at a site were the best indicators of changes in assemblage condition. Diversity indices, functional groups, behavior, and dominance metrics were not good indicators of urbanization. Richness metrics were better indicators of urban effects than were abundance metrics, and qualitative samples collected from multiple habitats gave similar results to those of single habitat quantitative samples (riffles or woody snags) in all metropolitan areas. Changes in urban intensity were strongly correlated with a set of landscape variables that was consistent across all metropolitan areas. In contrast, the instream environmental variables that were strongly correlated with urbanization and invertebrate responses varied among metropolitan areas. The natural environmental setting determined the biological, chemical, and physical instream conditions upon which urbanization acts and dictated the differences in responses to urbanization among metropolitan areas. Threshold analysis showed little evidence for an initial period of resistance to urbanization. Instead, assemblages were degraded at very low levels of urbanization, and response rates were either similar across the gradient or higher at low levels of urbanization. Levels of impervious cover that have been suggested as protective of streams (5–10%) were associated with significant assemblage degradation and were not protective.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Ian R Waite

##### Research Biologist

Oregon Water Science Center

iwaite@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Ian R Waite

##### Research Biologist

Oregon Water Science Center

iwaite@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Sacramento Projects Office (USGS California Water Science Center)          

6000 J Street, Placer HallSacramento, CA95819United States

916-278-3000

916-278-3070

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alabama
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  North Carolina
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wisconsin

View All **
### {In Archive} RE: McElmo Creek Unit Dwight Mallory to: Shaheerah Kelly, Patrick Flynn 05/16/2007 12:13 PM Cc: wilsonlaughter

From: "Dwight Mallory" <dmallory@rnrc.net> To: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, "Patrick Flynn" <pflynn@rnrc.net>, Cc: <wilsonlaughter@navajo.org> Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive.

The average gas throughput for the TEG dehy unit is 7,831,000 scf/day.

The average for the entire MCU compressor station is 11,856,000 scf/day.

Dwight Mallory Environmental, Health & Safety Coordinator Resolute Natural Resources Company 1675 Broadway, Suite 1950 Denver, CO 80202 Phone (303) 573-4886 X 1165 Fax (303) 623-3628

THIS COMMUNICATION AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE ADDRESSED PARTY ONLY, AND MAY BE PRIVILEGED UNDER LAW. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY FURTHER REVIEW OR DISSEMINATION OF THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS IS PROHIBITED BY LAW . IN SUCH EVENT YOU SHOULD DELETE THIS COMMUNICATION AND ALL ATTACHMENTS AND DESTROY ANY PRINTED COPIES. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER OF ANY ERRONEOUS TRANSMISSION OF THIS EMAIL. THANK YOU.
-----Original Message----- From: Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 4:42 PM To: Patrick Flynn Cc: Dwight Mallory; wilsonlaughter@navajo.org Subject: RE: McElmo Creek Unit

Pat, can you let me know when you think Resolute would have responses to the following questions I sent to you earlier. Thanks.

1. What is the actual average natural gas flowrate in (scf/day) to the TEG dehydration unit?2. If #1 is different for the entire gas compression plant, what is the plant-wide actual average natural gas throughput in scf/day?

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly U S EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579

"Patrick Flynn" <pflynn@rnrc.net

> To Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, 05/01/2007 04:14 "Dwight Mallory" PM <dmallory@rnrc.net>

cc
<wilsonlaughter@navajo.org>

Subject RE: McElmo Creek Unit

We have forwarded your questions on to our Operations folks and hope to be able to respond shortly.

Thanks - Pat

Sent by GoodLink (www.good.com)

-----Original Message----- From: Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 03:58 PM Mountain Standard Time To: Patrick Flynn; Dwight Mallory Cc: wilsonlaughter@navajo.orgSubject: McElmo Creek Unit

Hi. I have a couple more questions regarding the gas compression plant.

1. What is the actual average natural gas flowrate in (scf/day) to the TEG dehydration unit?

2. If #1 is different for the entire gas compression plant, what is the plant-wide actual average natural gas throughput in scf/day?

Please let me know.

Thanks.

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly U S EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579
```

EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Jacobson Resonance Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dr. Jerry I. Jacobson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                               /s/ Jerry I. Jacobson
                                                ---------------------
                                                   Jerry I. Jacobson;
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Principal Financial Officer

April 8, 2004
```
13734 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 1997 / Corrections

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96–AGL–29]

Establishment of Class E Airspace;

Lemmon, SD, Lemmon Municipal

Airport

Correction

In rule document 97–6617, beginning

on page 12536, in the issue of Monday,

March 17, 1977, make the following

correction:

On page 12537, in the first column, in

the AGL SD E5 Lemmon, SD [New]

paragraph, in the eighth line,

‘‘45°33′00′′’’ should read ‘‘45°45′00′′’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search:  Dalgaranga crater

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(1)

## By Location

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2005        Geology of five small Australian impact craters
EXHIBIT 23.4


We  consent  to  the use in this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December  31,  2004  for  LocatePLUS Holdings Corporation (the "Company") of our
report  dated  March  18, 2004, that contains an explanatory paragraph regarding
the  Company's  ability  to  continue  as  a going concern, as it relates to the
Company's  consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit)
and  cash  flows  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2003.



CARLIN,  CHARRON  &  ROSEN,  LLP
Westborough,  Massachusetts

May  17,  2005
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned,  James Carroll, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002*, that: 

|   | (a)           that  the annual report on Form 10-K of Biomass Secure Power Inc., for the period  ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and

(b)           that  information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

December 15,  2010

/s/ James  Carroll                  James  Carroll  President,  CEO, Chief Financial Officer, and Director Principle  Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

 

A signed original of  this written statement required by Section 906, or other document  authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears  in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required  by Section 906, has been provided to Biomass Secure Power Inc. and will be  retained by Biomass Secure Power Inc. and furnished to the Securities and  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Volcanic hazards in the Pacific U.S. Territories      

      July 19, 2019    

View Report

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Brian Shiro, Ph.D.

##### Deputy Director

Geologic Hazards Science Center

bshiro@usgs.gov

303-273-8515

## Related Content

#### Brian Shiro, Ph.D.

##### Deputy Director

Geologic Hazards Science Center

bshiro@usgs.gov

303-273-8515

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - American Samoa. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
                  -  Guam
                  -  Pacific U. S. Territories

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      52,644,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,753,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           104,533,000
<PP&E>                                     138,929,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,796,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             251,030,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,502,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       430,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               251,030,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           224,578,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              262,522,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,434,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (36,590,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (36,590,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-21121-LMI

IN RE: CHAPTER 13

WALTER GARCIA,

Debtor.

_________________________/

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM STAY AND CO-DEBTOR STAY 

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on November 3, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., upon the Motion for

Relief from Stay and Co-Debtor Stay filed by Creditor, A&S CAPITAL LLC 

[ECF 9], and the Court based on the record, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Creditor's Motion for Relief from Stay and Co-Debtor Stay be, and the same is hereby

granted in Order that Creditor may commence or conclude foreclosure proceedings upon the 

Page 1 of 2

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 5, 2020.

Case 20-21121-LMI Doc 17 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 2
following described property:

 Lot 9, DEL LAGO ISLE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 42, at 

Page 2, of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida.

 a/k/a 2501 Del Lago Drive, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316

2. This Order is entered for the purpose of allowing Creditor to obtain an in rem 

judgment against the property and to pursue its claims against Co-Debtor 2501 Del Lago LLC.

Creditor shall not seek nor obtain an in personam judgment against the Debtor.

Copies furnished to:

Stuart M. Gold, Esq.

600 S. Andrews Avenue, Suite 401

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (305) 591-1040

Email: sgold@swglawyers.com

Stuart M. Gold. is hereby directed to provide a conformed copy of this Order to all parties-ininterest and to file a Certificate of Service as to same)

# # #

Page 2 of 2

Case 20-21121-LMI Doc 17 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 2
AAM-13-156-E January 29, 2013

Exemption No. 10277A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0538

Ms. Doreen K. Brandt Human Resource Manager Fargo Jet Center, Inc.

3802 20 th Street, North Fargo, ND 58102

Dear Ms. Brandt:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10277. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 4, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Fargo Jet Center, Inc. (Fargo Jet Center), for an extension of Exemption No. 10277. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allowsFargo Jet Center, which is operating under separate parts of the regulation, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Fargo Jet Center.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10277 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Fargo Jet Center are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Fargo Jet Center part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10277 to June 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon
Galante Romar PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1150

Supreme Court of Florida.

[July 19, 2018]

Frank Tassone of Tassone, Dreicer, & Hill, LLC, Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer A. Donahue, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court on appeal from an order granting in part and denying in part a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder and a sentence of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851.1 We hereby dismiss this appeal because the guilt phase issues were waived since they were not briefed by Phillips, and the penalty phase issues were mooted by the new penalty phase ordered by the trial court pursuant to *Hurst v. State* , 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). Because there will be a new penalty phase, it is inconsequential whether Phillips's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue of intellectual disability at the previous penalty phase. As the State argued, Phillips may raise the issue of intellectual disability at the trial court prior to his new penalty phase proceedings. *See**Godwin v. State* , 593 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992) ("A case is 'moot' when it presents no actual controversy or when the issues have ceased to exist." (citing *Black's Law Dictionary* 1008 (6th ed. 1990) ) ).

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

1

We have jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10424]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 79 / Friday, April 24, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 20447]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 204

[DFARS Case 97-D005]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Central 
Contractor Registration

Correction

    In rule document 98-8417 beginning on page 15316, in the issue of 
Tuesday, March 31, 1998, make the following corrections:


204.7303  [Corrected]

    1. On page 15317, in the second column, in section 204.7303(a)(2), 
in the third line from the bottom, ``ccr.edi,disa.mil/ccr/cgi-bin 
status.pi'' should read ``ccr.edi.disa.mil/ccr/cgi-bin/status.pl''.
    2. On the same page, in the same columm, in section 204.7303(a)(4), 
in the sixth line, ``225.2204-7004'' should read ``252.204-7004''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 30157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90607]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD11-94-007]
RIN 2115-AE84


Regulated Navigation Area; San Francisco Bay Region, CA

Correction

    In rule document 95-8124 beginning on page 16793 in the issue of 
Monday, April 3, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 16793, in the SUMMARY section, in the third column, in 
the eighth line, ``with'' should read ``will''.


Sec. 165.1114  [Corrected]

    2. On page 16797, in the first column, in Sec. 165.1114(c)(1)(i), 
in the first line, the coordinate ``27<SUP> deg.47'18"N'' should read 
``37<SUP> deg.47'18"N''.
    3. On the same page, in the same column, in the same section, in 
the 11th line, the coordinate ``27<SUP> deg.49'22"N'' should read 
``37<SUP> deg.49'22"N''.
    4. On the same page, in the third column, in 
Sec. 165.1114(c)(1)(ii)(F)(4), in the nineth line, the coordinate 
``38<SUP> deg.03'23"N''should read ``38<SUP> deg.03'13"N''.
    5. On page 16798, in the first column, in 
Sec. 165.1114(c)(1)(ii)(F)(7), in the 10th line, the coordinate 
``122<SUP> deg.21'12"W;'' should read ``122<SUP> deg.22'12"W;''.
    6. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in 
the 11th line, the coordinate ``37<SUP> deg.48'26"N;'' should read 
``37<SUP> deg.47'26"N;''.
    7. On the same page, in the third column, in 
Sec. 165.1114(e)(3)(i)(B)(2), in the third line, ``transmit'' should 
read ``transit''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4907 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4907

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-free 
 distributions from individual retirement plans to donor-advised funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2016

Mr. Holding (for himself, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Kelly 
of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Gene Green of Texas) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-free 
 distributions from individual retirement plans to donor-advised funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grow Philanthropy Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. TAX-FREE DISTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT PLANS TO 
              DONOR-ADVISED FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 408(d)(8)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or any fund or account described 
in section 4966(d)(2)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to distributions made in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2016.
                                 <all>
```
Emmanuel JACKSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2652

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.