alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,783

ANTHONY BARTEE, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 1997-CR-1659

IN THE 175 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

BEXAR COUNTY

Per Curiam. HERVEY, J., not participating.

O P I N I O N

In May 1998, a jury found appellant guilty of the offense of capital murder. The

jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set appellant’s punishment at death. This

Court affirmed appellant’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Bartee v. State, No.

AP-73,126 (Tex. Crim. App. May 3, 2000)(not designated for publication). Appellant

filed his initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus in the convicting
BARTEE – 2

court on January 3, 2000. This Court denied appellant relief. Ex parte Bartee, No. WR63,381-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 8, 2006)(not designated for publication). Appellant’s

first subsequent application was filed in the trial court on April 20, 2011, and this Court

dismissed it. Ex parte Bartee, No. WR-63,381-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 14, 2011)(not

designated for publication). This Court dismissed his second subsequent application on

February 29, 2012. Ex parte Bartee, No. WR-63,381-04 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 29,

2012)(not designated for publication).

On March 1, 2012, the trial court granted appellant’s motion for post-conviction

DNA testing and ordered additional testing. After the testing lab filed its report, the trial

court held a hearing and found that appellant had failed to show that, had the results of

the DNA testing been available during the trial of this offense, it is reasonably probable

that appellant would not have been convicted. Appellant filed an appeal which was

received by this Court on April 30, 2012. Appellant is scheduled to be executed on

Wednesday, May 2, 2012. He seeks relief on appeal from the trial court’s finding and a

stay of his execution pending a final disposition of this appeal.

The report issued pursuant to the March 1 testing order concluded that the victim

could not be excluded as the contributor of the evidence tested. Given these results, the

trial court correctly concluded that appellant failed to show that, had the evidence been

available at trial, he would not have been convicted.

Concluding that there was no reversible error in the proceedings below, we affirm
BARTEE – 3

the judgment of the trial court and deny appellant’s motion to stay his execution.

Delivered: May 2, 2012

Do Not Publish
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Newsletter 

#           Research in the refuge constraints to restoring diverse forest ecosystems at Hakalau      

      April 30, 2020    

No abstract available. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Eben H Paxton

##### Research Ecologist

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center

epaxton@usgs.gov

808-985-6423

## Related Content

#### Eben H Paxton

##### Research Ecologist

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center

epaxton@usgs.gov

808-985-6423

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center          

Crater Rim Drive, Hawai‘i Volcanoes National ParkPO Box 44Hawai‘i National Park, HI96718United States

(808) 985-6420

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge
                  - hawaii

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 113]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and 
other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information 
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Our 
customers will be able to submit this form on paper or electronically. 
The form has been updated in order to standardize the outline of this 
application to those used for medium-term insurance and guarantees and 
financial institution short-term single sale insurance. The application 
also more explicitly states the financial information that is required 
to be submitted with the application. This form mirrors the on-line 
version of the application that Ex-Im Bank is developing.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 29, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and requests for additional information 
to Walter Kosciow, Export-Import Bank of the U.S., 811 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3649, (800) 565-3946, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfa8beb3abbaadf1b4b0acbcb6b0a89fbaa7b6b2f1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d2a3c3129382f7336322e3e34322a1d38253430733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and Form Number: Application for Exporter Short-term Single-
Buyer Insurance, EIB 92-64.
    OMB Number: 3048-0018.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to obtain 
legislatively required assurance of repayment and fulfills other 
statutory requirements.
    Affected Public: The form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 191.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 191 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: As needed each time an exporter 
seeks to obtain Ex-Im Bank short-term insurance for a single-buyer 
export sale.

    Dated: April 24, 2009.
Solomon Bush,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-9848 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5th C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40036 Summary Calendar

RICKEY GENE SPICER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LELAND HEUSZEL, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Warden; RICHARD HENRY, Individually and in his official capacity as Field Correctional Officer; ERIC COLLIER, Individually and in his official capacity as Building Correctional Officer; NEAL ROY SMITH, Individually and in his official capacity as Field Sergeant; CLYDE COOPER, Individually and in his official capacity as Field Lieutenant; JAMES WARREN, Individually and inn his official capacity as Disciplinary Captain; SHENANE BOSTON, Individually and in her official capacity as Disciplinary Counsel; DAVID FORREST, Individually and in his official capacity as Building Major; KENT RAMSEY, Individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director; J.M. COCKERHAM, Individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Director,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the
Eastern District of Texas
(9:96-CV-373)

July 28, 1997

Before JOHNSON, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rickey Gene Spicer (#5763346), a state prisoner, has appealed2

the distr ict court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as

frivolous. In his complaint Spicer contends that the defendants

retaliated against him by filing false disciplinary charges and

that he was denied his right of procedural due process in

connection with prison disciplinary proceedings.

A complaint filed in forma pauperis “may be dismisse d as

frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact.” E ason v.

Thaler

, 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I).

This court reviews dismissals as frivolous for abuse of discretion.

See Graves v. Hampton

, 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). In the

present case, Spicer’s allegations of retaliation are insufficient

to raise a constitutional issue. See Whittington v. Lynaugh , 842

F.2d 818, 819-21 (5th Cir. 1988), W oods v. Smith

, 60 F.3d 1161,

1166 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S.Ct. 800 (1996).

Furthermore, Spic er’s due process claims were properly dismissed

under the rule in Sandin v. Conner , 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995).

See Luken v. Scott

, 71 F.3d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied

,

116 S. Ct. 1690 (1996). Therefore, we hold that the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as

frivolous. S ee Graves v. Hampton

, 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993).

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5th C I R

. R.

42.2. We caution Spicer that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him wil l invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions Spicer is further cautioned to review any pending appeals3

to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED, SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-51203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

 21 CFR Part 200

[Docket No. 96N-0048]


Sterility Requirements for Inhalation Solution Products

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-25130, beginning on page 49638, in the 
issue of Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the third column, in the DATES 
section, in the sixth and seventh lines, ``March 23, 1998.'' should 
read ``1 year after its date of publication in the Federal Register.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Preservation of ancient impact ages on the R chondrite parent body: 40Ar/39Ar age of hornblende-bearing R chondrite LAP 04840      

      September 1, 2016    

The hornblende- and biotite-bearing R chondrite LAP 04840 is a rare kind of meteorite possibly containing outer solar system water stored during metamorphism or postshock annealing deep within an asteroid. Because little is known regarding its age and origin, we determined 40Ar/39Ar ages on hornblende-rich separates of the meteorite, and obtained plateau ages of 4340(±40) to 4380(±30) Ma. These well-defined plateau ages, coupled with evidence for postshock annealing, indicate this meteorite records an ancient shock event and subsequent annealing. The age of 4340–4380 Ma (or 4.34–4.38 Ga) for this and other previously dated R chondrites is much older than most impact events recorded by ordinary chondrites and points to an ancient event or events that predated the late heavy bombardment that is recorded in so many meteorites and lunar samples.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael Cosca

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

mcosca@usgs.gov

303-236-4974

#### Leah E Morgan, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

lemorgan@usgs.gov

303-236-4729

## Related Content

#### Michael Cosca

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

mcosca@usgs.gov

303-236-4974

#### Leah E Morgan, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

lemorgan@usgs.gov

303-236-4729

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 11044 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Donald Matthew Basta,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 1:19

- CR

- 120

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Higginson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Donald Basta has moved to with

d raw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Basta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s bri ef and the relevant portions of the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 15, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-11044 Document: 00515899669 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2021No. 20

- 11044

2 record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw
is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 20-11044 Document: 00515899669 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2021
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB of FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerald W. Quealy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 02, 2005


/s/ GERALD W. QUEALY
__________________________________
    Gerald W. Quealy
    Treasurer and Chief
    Financial Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY  FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 23.4

         CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO: The Jackson Rivers Company

As registered independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-KSB under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of The Jackson Rivers Company for the year ended
December  31,  2004  of  our  report  dated  March 17, 2005 and contained in the
Registration  Statement  NO.  333-121624 of The Jackson Rivers Company Form  S-8
under  the  Securities  Act  of  1933  insofar  as  such  report relates  to the
financial  statements  of The Jackson Rivers Company for the year ended December
31,  2004.



                          /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                          --------------------------------------------
                           Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP



McLean, Virginia
March 17, 2005


<PAGE>
Exhibit 13.2

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Veolia Environnement, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 12, 2013 |        |                                     
|-------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------
|                     | By:    | /s/
        Pierre-François Riolacci
|                     |        |                                     
|                     | Name:  | Pierre-François
        Riolacci    
|                     | Title: | Chief
        Finance Officer       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veolia Environnement and will be retained by Veolia Environnement and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Ronald HERSH, Appellant, v. Megan MCDOWELL, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-9

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: Loren M Porto CASE NUMBER:20-18159-RAM

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for September 22, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the September 22, 

2020 hearing were due as of September 3, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to 

"re-sending" documents)

PLAN served 8/1

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service and agrees on the record:

Continue confirmation to 10/20: 

Due on or before 5pm on 9/24: a) amend plan to pay debtor's calculation of CMI DI $104,094.60, b) FMV of 

10 Ford, c) evidence and calculation of CMI line 16, 17, 18, 1ne 25

Case 20-18159-RAM Doc 22 Filed 09/16/20 Page 1 of 1
|   | (a) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November      25, 2008 | By:      /s/ Scott      Hughes                            |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Scott      Hughes                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                              | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                |
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00184

- CV
Prosperity Energy Corporation

v. Terfam Family, Ltd., and Lambert Quartey

On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 1058

- 14

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 29, 2015
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           USGS 1-min Dst index      

      January 1, 2011    

We produce a 1-min time resolution storm-time disturbance index, the USGS Dst, called Dst8507-4SM. This index is based on minute resolution horizontal magnetic field intensity from low-latitude observatories in Honolulu, Kakioka, San Juan and Hermanus, for the years 1985–2007. The method used to produce the index uses a combination of time- and frequency-domain techniques, which more clearly identifies and excises solar-quiet variation from the horizontal intensity time series of an individual station than the strictly time-domain method used in the Kyoto Dst index. The USGS 1-min Dst is compared against the Kyoto Dst, Kyoto Sym-H, and the USGS 1-h Dst (Dst5807-4SH). In a time series comparison, Sym-H is found to produce more extreme values during both sudden impulses and main phase maximum deviation, possibly due to the latitude of its contributing observatories. Both Kyoto indices are shown to have a peak in their distributions below zero, while the USGS indices have a peak near zero. The USGS 1-min Dst is shown to have the higher time resolution benefits of Sym-H, while using the more typical low-latitude observatories of Kyoto Dst.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **