alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3658 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 300 Fayetteville Street in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Jesse 

Helms Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2012 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 300 Fayetteville Street in Raleigh, 

North Carolina, as the ‘‘Jesse Helms Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

5 located at 300 Fayetteville Street in Raleigh, North Caro6 lina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jesse Helms 

7 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3658 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jesse 

6 Helms Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
Case 20-22687-LMI    Doc 45    Filed 10/23/23    Page 1 of 3

Case 20-22687-LMI    Doc 45    Filed 10/23/23    Page 2 of 3

Case 20-22687-LMI    Doc 45    Filed 10/23/23    Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           USGS Arctic Science Strategy      

      July 17, 2015    

View Report PDF

View Report HTML

The United States is one of eight Arctic nations responsible for the stewardship of a polar region undergoing dramatic environmental, social, and economic changes. Although warming and cooling cycles have occurred over millennia in the Arctic region, the current warming trend is unlike anything recorded previously and is affecting the region faster than any other place on Earth, bringing dramatic reductions in sea ice extent, altered weather, and thawing permafrost. Implications of these changes include rapid coastal erosion threatening villages and critical infrastructure, potentially significant effects on subsistence activities and cultural resources, changes to wildlife habitat, increased greenhouse-gas emissions from thawing permafrost, threat of invasive species, and opening of the Arctic Ocean to oil and gas exploration and increased shipping. The Arctic science portfolio of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and its response to climate-related changes focuses on landscapescale ecosystem and natural resource issues and provides scientific underpinning for understanding the physical processes that shape the Arctic. The science conducted by the USGS informs the Nation's resource management policies and improves the stewardship of the Arctic Region.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Region 11: Alaska

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

### Explore Search

                  - Arctic Circle boundary

View All **
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
 
 I,
Michael P. Walsh, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SmartVideo Technologies,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:
 
 (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5. The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 **COMPANY NAME
      CORPORATION**Date: April 27,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Michael P.
  WalshMichael P. WalshChief
      Financial Officer
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4903 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Internal Revenue Service 

to target citizens of the United States for exercising 

any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to 

the Constitution of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4903 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TARGETING BY THE INTER2 NAL REVENUE SERVICE BASED ON THE EXER3 CISE OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. 

4 None of the funds made available under any Act may 

5 be used by the Internal Revenue Service to target citizens 

6 of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed 

7 under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the 

8 United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
First Amendment to Employment Agreement (James S. Broenen)



 Exhibit 10.21 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN FENDER 
 MUSICAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION AND JAMES BROENEN 
 This First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement
between James Broenen and Fender Musical Instruments Corporation, which is dated December 2, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”), shall be effective as of April 1, 2010. All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall
have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement. 
 The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“Initial Term/Employment Period. Fender hereby continues to employ Executive, and Executive hereby agrees to his continued
employment as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, for an initial term to end on March 31, 2013 (the “Initial Term”), unless the employment is earlier terminated as provided herein. During the Initial Term or, if shorter,
that portion of the Initial Term during which Executive remains continuously employed by Fender (the “Employment Period”), Executive shall perform such services, consistent with his titles, as may from time to time be assigned to, or
expected from, him by the Board of Directors of Fender, or those officers empowered by the Board to supervise Executive, including the CEO.” 
  

	 	2.	The first three sentences of Section 7(b) of the Employment Agreement are deleted and replaced with the following: 


“Severance Pay. Upon termination of the Employment Period (i) by Fender other than for Cause or (ii) by Executive
for Good Reason, Executive shall be entitled to receive a lump sum amount in cash equal to one (1) year’s Annual Compensation (as defined below). Upon termination of the Employment Period (i) by Fender (or any successor) other than
for Cause or (ii) by Executive for Good Reason, in each case, following a Change in Control, as defined below, Executive shall not be paid the severance amount described in the preceding sentence, but rather shall be entitled to receive a lump
sum amount in cash equal to two (2) years’ Annual Compensation (as defined below). In addition, Fender shall pay or reimburse Executive for any and all COBRA payments or other benefit continuation expenses incurred by Executive for
(i) one year if Executive is terminated by Fender other than for cause or if Executive leaves for Good Reason, or (ii) two years if Executive is terminated by Fender other than for cause or if Executive leaves for Good Reason, in each
case, following a Change of Control.” 








	 	3.	Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment. 

FENDER MUSICAL 
 INSTRUMENTS
CORPORATION 
  

									
	By:	 	/s/ William Mendello	 		 	By:	 	/s/ James Broenen
	Name:	 	William Mendello	 		 		 	      James Broenen
	Title:	 	CEO	 		 		 	
			
	Dated: 3/22/10	 		 	Dated: 3/22/10
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT REGIS SANSON and MICHELLE ) SANSON, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1572 ) REFLECTION KEY CONDOMINIUM ) ASSOCIATION, INC., and JILL L. TRENTZ,) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed February 9, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge. Robert J. Hynds of Robert J. Hynds, PL, Fort Myers, for Appellants. Susan M. McLaughlin of Pavese Law Firm, Fort Myers, for Appellees. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Using landscape metrics to characterize towns along an urban-rural gradient      

      July 1, 2021    

### Context

Urban-rural gradients are useful tools when examining the influence of human disturbances on ecological, social and coupled systems, yet the most commonly used gradient definitions are based on single broad measures such as housing density or percent forest cover that fail to capture landscape patterns important for conservation.

### Objectives

We present an approach to defining urban–rural gradients that integrates multiple landscape pattern metrics related to ecosystem processes important for natural resources and wildlife sustainability.

### Methods

We develop a set of land cover composition and configuration metrics and then use them as inputs to a cluster analysis process that, in addition to grouping towns with similar attributes, identifies exemplar towns for each group. We compare the outcome of the cluster-based urban-rural gradient typology to outcomes for four commonly-used rule-based typologies and discuss implications for resource management and conservation.

### Results

The resulting cluster-based typology defines five town types (urban, suburban, exurban, rural, and agricultural) and notably identifies a bifurcation along the gradient distinguishing among rural forested and agricultural towns. Landscape patterns (e.g., core and islet forests) influence where individual towns fall along the gradient. Designations of town type differ substantially among the five different typologies, particularly along the middle of the gradient.

### Conclusions

Understanding where a town occurs along the urban-rural gradient could aid local decision-makers in prioritizing and balancing between development and conservation scenarios. Variations in outcomes among the different urban-rural gradient typologies raise concerns that broad-measure classifications do not adequately account for important landscape patterns. We suggest future urban-rural gradient studies utilize more robust classification approaches.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Cyndy Loftin, PhD

##### Supervisory Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

cyndy_loftin@usgs.gov

207-581-2843

## Related Content

#### Cyndy Loftin, PhD

##### Supervisory Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

cyndy_loftin@usgs.gov

207-581-2843

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Connecticut. Maine
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  Rhode Island
                  -  Vermont

View All **
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment N° 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Veolia Environnement; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/ Antoine Frérot        |   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|            | Name: Antoine Frérot      |
|            | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
Case 20-19686-LMI Doc 23 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-19686-LMI Doc 23 Filed 10/29/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 207 (Tuesday, October 27, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 57353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-11027]



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 207 / Tuesday, October 27, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 57353]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM99-1-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 98-28341 appearing on page 56631, in the issue 
of Thursday, October 22, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 56631, in the first column, the docket number is corrected 
to read as set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4864 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4864

To revise the crime of sexual assault under Article 120 of the Uniform 
   Code of Military Justice to include committing a sexual act upon 
    another person by using position, rank, or authority to obtain 
                    compliance by the other person.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2016

  Ms. Frankel of Florida (for herself, Mrs. Walorski, Ms. Speier, Ms. 
  Tsongas, Ms. Matsui, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mrs. Dingell, Mrs. 
Brooks of Indiana, and Mrs. Noem) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To revise the crime of sexual assault under Article 120 of the Uniform 
   Code of Military Justice to include committing a sexual act upon 
    another person by using position, rank, or authority to obtain 
                    compliance by the other person.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Sexual Exploitation of 
Power Act''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF DEFINITION OF ARTICLE 120 SEXUAL ASSAULT UNDER THE 
              UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE TO INCLUDE COMMITTING A 
              SEXUAL ACT UPON ANOTHER PERSON BY USING POSITION, RANK, 
              OR AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCE BY THE OTHER PERSON.

    Section 920(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code (article 
120(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as 
        subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
        subparagraph (C):
                    ``(C) using position, rank, or authority to obtain 
                compliance by the other person;''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John P. Hamill *John P. HamillChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)  *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
AAM-12-155-E 

January 27, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10062A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0441 

Mr. Jeff Wanke 

President 

Orion Flight Services, Inc. 

525 West 20th Avenue 

Oshkosh, WI 54902 

Dear Mr. Wanke: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10062. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 6, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Orion Flight Services, Inc. (Orion), for an extension of Exemption No. 10062. That 

exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Orion, which is 

operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Orion. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10062 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 
 2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Orion are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while 

conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Orion part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10062 to April 30, 2014, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 10062 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10062. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12675-12676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10317]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


State of Mississippi Declaration of Disaster <SUP>#2936

    Union County and the contiguous Counties of Benton, Lafayette, Lee, 
Marshall, Pontotoc, Prentiss, and

[[Page 12676]]

Tippah in the State of Mississippi constitute a disaster area as a 
result of damages caused by heavy rain and tornadoes which occurred 
February 28--March 1, 1997. Applications for loans for physical damage 
may be filed until the close of business on May 9, 1997 and for 
economic injury until the close of business on December 10, 1997 at the 
address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, 
Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For physical damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere..................     7.625
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere...............     3.875
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere..................     8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere........................................     4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere........................................     7.250
For economic injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere.................................     4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 293612 
and for economic injury the number is 943000.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: March 10, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[R Doc. 97-6565 Filed 3-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P