alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-40822]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-485-801-, A-559-801, A-
401-801, A-412-801]


Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and 
Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore, 
Sweden, and the United Kingdom; Initiation of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Notice of Request for Revocation of an Order

Correction

    In the issue of Thursday, June 26, 1997, on page 34504, in the 
third column, in the correction of notice document 97-15867, in the 
table, the first entry under ``France A-427-801'' should read as 
follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Proceedings and firms                Domestic like product        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
France A-427-801:                                                       
  SNFA...........................  Ball & Cylindrical.                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Nutrient yield of the Apalachicola River flood plain, Florida; water-quality assessment plan      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

The Apalachicola River in northwestern Florida is the location of one of four current U.S. Geological Survey National River Quality Assessments. The investigation of the Apalachicola River and flood plain is designed to quantify the organic detritus and nutrient yield to the productive, estuarine Apalachicola Bay. The extensive riverine flood plain is subject to seasonal flooding which transports large quantities of accumulated, decaying leaf litter from the flood plain into the river and ultimately into Apalachicola Bay. The Apalachicola River Quality Assessment has four major objectives; (1) Determine the accumulation of organic substances and trace elements in benthic organisms and fine-grained sediments; (2) Define the distribution of the major tree communities on the flood plain; (3) Assess the role of leaf fall and decomposition on nutrient yield; and (4) Identify and quantify major sources and pathways of nutrients to the river. Extensive emphasis is given to investigation approaches and techniques to facilitate technology transfer to similar wetland ecosystems. (USGS)

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - apalachicola river
                  - Florida

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           U.S. Geological Survey risk research community of practice 2021 workshop report—Workshop on considering equitable engagement in research design      

      October 31, 2023    

View Report

HTML Format

XML Format

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Risk Research and Applications Community of Practice (Risk CoP) is a bureau-wide forum to share resources and discuss issues relevant to “conducting and applying scientific research in hazards—the dangerous processes or phenomena that may cause damage—to enhance the reduction of risk—the potential for societally relevant losses caused by hazards” (Ludwig and others, 2018). In 2021, this group held a workshop entitled “Considering Equitable Engagement in Research Design” as a part of its annual meeting. This report is a result of the workshop findings and includes additional input from the Risk CoP, other communities of practice, and subject matter experts across the USGS. The resources described in this report are intended to help guide USGS scientists aiming to include equity into their risk research but can apply to all USGS scientists, regardless of their research focus. This report shares key considerations for equitable engagement as identified by workshop participants, a discussion of the spectrum of engagement in equity-related research, and a toolkit that can help USGS scientists consider how to integrate equity into their work. Although this report is not comprehensive, it does seek to fill a gap that exists at the USGS; at the time of writing, there is no guidance on how to integrate equity into research design. The authors of this report believe that this document can serve as a foundation for future equity-related work at the USGS.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Alice B. Kelly Pennaz

##### Risk Project Team Lead

Natural Hazards Mission Area

apennaz@usgs.gov

703-648-6706

## Related Content

#### Alice B. Kelly Pennaz

##### Risk Project Team Lead

Natural Hazards Mission Area

apennaz@usgs.gov

703-648-6706

### Contact

####               Natural Hazards Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”)
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”),
I, Steven Malone, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), that:
   (1)
    The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report.
 In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this
7 th day of
June, 2005.
   By
    /s/
      Steven MaloneSteven
      MalonePresident
      & Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Stream measurement work: Appendix 4 in *Nineteenth biennial report of the State Engineer to the governor of Utah: 1933-1934*

      January 1, 1934    

Stream measurement work under the usual co-operative agreement between the U.S. Geological Survey and the State Engineer continued during the biennium for the purpose of determining the water resources of the State. This work in Utah is part of the general plan for a systematic determination of the water resources of the United States begun by the Geological Survey in 1888. Records of stream flow on a few rivers in the West were taken as part of special studies on irrigation, in which connection gaging stations were established on the Bear, Weber, Provo, and Sevier rivers. The Bear River station at Collinston has been maintained continuously since that date.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



(Section 302 Certification)



I, Beth Sanders, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 10, 2004



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Beth Sanders                                
|Executive Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer
Dearrell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 25, 2018

Marie A. Mattox, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, M. Lilja Dandelake, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Dearrell Williams, appeals a Notice of Dismissal of her charge of discrimination filed under Florida's Whistleblower's Act. We agree with Appellant that *247the Florida Commission on Human Relations erred in dismissing her charge as being untimely when it was filed on Monday, July 3, 2017, the first weekday following the Saturday on which the pertinent sixty-day filing period ended. *See* Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Y-2.006 ("The mission and duties of the Commission [on Human Relations] are carried out pursuant to statutory authority delineated in Chapter 760, F.S. The following additional statutory chapters and rule chapters directly affect and govern the operations of the Commission: ... (5) Chapters 28-101 through 28-106, 28-108, 28-109, F.A.C."); Fla. Admin. Code. R. 28-106.103 ("In computing any period of time allowed by this chapter, by order of a presiding officer, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act from which the period of time begins to run shall not be included. *The last day of the period shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday* ." (Emphasis added)). In agreeing with Appellant, we find the reliance Appellee, the Department of Corrections, places upon Florida Administrative Code Rule 60Y-5.001(3) to be misplaced. That rule, which provides in part that any document received by the clerk or other agent of the Commission after 5:00 p.m. shall be filed as of 8:00 a.m. on the next regular business day, does not address a situation where the last day of the pertinent filing period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday.

Accordingly, we REVERSE the Notice of Dismissal and REMAND for further proceedings.

Lewis, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RE: GEORBEL BARQUIE & YANELYS RODRIGUEZ CASE NUMBER:20-10690-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for March 24, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the March 24, 2020 

hearing were due as of March 6, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

1AP @ ECF#24

Serviced 21 days prior: YES DE#25 (2/27)

Continue to 4/28:

Due on or before 5pm on 4/10: 1) file motion to value and set for hearing, 2) Amend plan to correct creditor 

address for Wells Fargo (POC #26) in Section III.B

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

Case 20-10690-AJC Doc 27 Filed 03/13/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.3

               Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, Gaylen M. Brotherson, state and attest that:

     (1)  To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  upon a  review  of the  covered
          reports  of  M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc.,  and,  except  as  corrected  or
          supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

          o    no covered  report  contained  an untrue  statement of a material
               fact as of the end of the period  covered  by such  report (or in
               the case of a report on Form 8-K or definitive  proxy  materials,
               as of the date on which it was filed); and

          o    no covered  report  omitted to state a material fact necessary to
               make  the  statements  in the  covered  report,  in  light of the
               circumstances  under which they were made,  not  misleading as of
               the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case of a
               report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials,  as of the date
               on which it was filed).

     (2)  I have  reviewed the  contents of this  statement  with the  Company's
          Audit Committee.

     (3)  In this statement  under oath,  each of the following,  if filed on or
          before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

          o    Annual Report on Form 10-K of M.B.A. Holdings,  Inc. for the year
               ended  October 31, 2004 filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
               Commission, File Number 1-9183,

          o    all  reports  on Form  10-Q,  all  reports  on  Form  8-K and all
               definitive  proxy materials of M.B.A.  Holdings,  Inc. filed with
               the  Commission  subsequent  to  the  filing  of  the  Form  10-K
               identified above; and

          o    any amendments to any of the foregoing.


By: /s/ Gaylen M. Brotherson
-------------------------------
Gaylen M. Brotherson
June 14, 2005
                                              Subscribed  and sworn to before me
                                              This 14th day of June 2005.

                                              /s/ Marjorie Smith
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Notary Public
                                              My Commission Expires:
                                              March 18, 2008


                                       18
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We have issued our report dated September 1, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule included in the Annual Report of Collectors Universe, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of that report in
Registration Statements No. 333-34554, No. 333-34558, No. 333-85962, No. 333-121035, No. 333-137375 and No. 333-139513 of Collectors Universe, Inc. and subsidiaries, each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8.








/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP





Irvine, California


September 1, 2009
Elgin L. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3853

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Interpretation of long- and short-wavelength magnetic anomalies      

      April 15, 1980    

Magset was launched on October 30, 1979.  More than a decade of examining existing data, devising appropriate models of the global magnetic field, and extending methods for interpreting long-wavelength magnetic anomalies preceded this launch

Magnetic data collected by satellite can be interrupted by using a method of analysis that quantitively describes the magnetic field resulting from three-dimensional geologic structures that are bounded by an arbitrary number of polygonal faces,  Each face my have any orientation and three or more sides.  At each point of the external field, the component normal to each face is obtained by using an expression for the solid angle subtended by a generalized polygon.  The "cross" of tangential components are relatively easy to obtain for the same polygons.

No approximations have been made related to orbit height that restrict the dimensions of the polygons relative to the distance from the external field points.  This permits the method to be used to model shorter wavelength anomalies obtained from aircraft or ground surveys.

The magnetic fields for all the structures considered are determine in the same rectangular coordinate system.  The coordinate system is in depended from the orientation of geologic trends and permits multiple structures or bodies to be included in the same magnetic field calculations.  This single reference system also simplified adjustments in position and direction to account for earth curvature in regional interpretation.

## Citation Information
Case 21-10746-LMI Doc 23 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 21-10746-LMI Doc 23 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
Victoria FATER, Petitioner, v. Kyle FATER, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

Michael R. Yokan, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Corrine A. Bylund of Bylund Law, PLLC, Jacksonville Beach, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Application to Amend Foreign Air Carrier Permit
September 11 , 2012



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HECTOR GAINES BARKLE Y, III , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00941

- CV V.

TEXAS WINDSTORM INSU RANCE ASSOCIATION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on September 22, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Hector Gaines Barkley, III.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6671

MALCOLM BRYANT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN MCGEEIE; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1276-AMD) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 1, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Malcolm Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bryant has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED