alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LF-25 (rev. 12/01/15) Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: CASE NO.: 20-21157-BKC-AJC

CHAPTER 13

FRANCISCA RAUDALES

 Debtor. /

AGREED ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART

AND OVERRULING IN PART DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO CLAIM [D.E. 32]

This matter having been considered on consent motion calendar upon the 

Debtor's Objection to Claim 6-1 of US Bank Trust, N.A./ SN Servicing Corporation [DE 

#32], and the parties having conferred and resolved the matter between them, it is

ORDERED that Debtor's objection[s] to the following claim is SUSTAINED IN PART and 

OVERRULED IN PART as follows: 

Claim No. Claimant Amount Disposition 

6-1 US Bank 

Trust, N.A./ 

SN 

Servicing 

Corporation

$167,974.12 Claim6 is ALLOWED in the total claim 

amount of $160,796.62 with an arrearage 

amount of $64,514.20. This order reduces 

the total claim and arrearage amount by 

$7,177.50 as agreed to by the parties which

consists of reducing of the Prepetition fees 

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 18, 2021.

Case 20-21157-AJC Doc 52 Filed 03/19/21 Page 1 of 2
LF-25 (rev. 12/01/15) Page 2 of 2

due by $5,684.00 and reducing the escrow 

deficiency for funds advanced by $1,493.50. 

###

Aimee Melich, Esq. shall serve a conformed copy of this Order upon all parties of 

interest and shall file a Certificate of Service in accordance with Local Rule 2002-1(F).

Case 20-21157-AJC Doc 52 Filed 03/19/21 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AGREEMENT TO FORFEIT 
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS 

THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of February 23, 2012 (this “Agreement”), between
                     (the “Executive”) and WebMD Health Corp. (the “Company”). 

WHEREAS, the Company has adopted and sponsors the WebMD Health Corp. Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), under which the Company is permitted to grant equity based incentive compensation to its employees; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan and the award agreement(s) entered into by and between the Company and the Executive under the Plan (the
“Award Agreement(s)”) on the following grant dates(s), the Company granted the Executive the stated number of non-qualified stock options, of which the stated number of options remain outstanding and unexercised as of the date
hereof (the “Outstanding Options”): 
  

					
	 Grant Date
	  	Aggregate Number of Stock Options Granted	  	Outstanding Options
		  		  	

 WHEREAS, the Outstanding Options have little or no current value based on the exercise price for such
Outstanding Options; and 
 WHEREAS, the Executive wishes to voluntarily forfeit the Outstanding Options for no consideration,
and make them available for further awards under the Plan, and the Company wishes to accept such forfeiture. 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
the Executive and the Company hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Outstanding Options. The Outstanding Options are hereby
forfeited, and the Executive shall have no further rights in the Outstanding Options. The Executive and the Company both acknowledge that the Company has not paid or promised to pay to the Executive any consideration, whether now or in the future,
with respect to the forfeiture of the Outstanding Options. 
 2. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, including, without limitation, the Award
Agreement(s) related thereto. 

  
 1 








 3. Amendment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the terms hereof may be amended,
supplemented, waived or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which the enforcement of such amendment, supplement, waiver or modification shall be sought. 

4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party. 

5. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware,
regardless of principles of conflicts of laws that may require the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has executed this Agreement, and the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all as of the date first set forth above. 

 

			
	  

	[Name of Executive]
	
	WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:



  
 2
Exhibit 10.6


 


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO Promissory note


 


THIS
SECOND Amendment (THE “SECOND AMENDMENT”) DATED July 20,
2017, shall amend the Promissory note (THE “NOTE”) dated AS OF september
24, 2014 and amended on july 27, 2015 (“the first amendment”) AMONG NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. (THE
“MAKER”) AND JANE HSIAO (THE “PAYEE”) AS NOTED BELOW. THE NOTE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT
SHALL BE REFERRED TO AS THE AMENDED NOTE.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Maker and
Payee (collectively, the “Parties”) are parties to the Note which became effective on September 24, 2014;


 


WHEREAS, on July
27, 2015, the Parties amended the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2015 until July 31, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date from July 31, 2017 until July 31, 2018.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the Note and this Second Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


AMENDMENT


 


1. Section
1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


The principal amount of the loan evidenced
hereby, together with any accrued and unpaid interest, and any and all unpaid costs, fees and expenses accrued, shall be due and
payable on July 31, 2018 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


2. Governing Law.
This Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to its conflict of laws rules or principles.


 


3. Amendments. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


4. Entire Agreement.
This Second Amendment and the Note constitute the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior understandings and writings between the Parties relating thereto.


 


5. Interpretation.
Any capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning provided in the Note.


 



    	 	 	 



    	 



     


6. Counterparts.
This Second Amendment may be executed manually, electronically in Adobe® PDF file format, or by facsimile by the Parties, in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same amendment and shall become effective when a counterpart
hereof shall have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to the other Party.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Borrower has duly executed this Second Amendment to the Note and Security Note as of the 20th day of July, 2017.


 


	 	NON-INVASIVE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James J. Martin 
	 	Name:	James J. Martin
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer


 


	Agreed and Accepted:	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Jane Hsiao	 
	Name:	
        JANE HSIAO, Ph.D.

        
	 


 



    	 	- 2-
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

PERFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY SPC Chapter 15 

Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. Case No.: 21-12609-AJC

________________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE 

OF PAPERS AND ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Paul J. Battista, Esq., John H. Genovese, Esq. and the law 

firm of Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. (the “GJB Law Firm”) hereby enter their appearance as 

counsel on behalf of the following Segregated Portfolios: (i) Gen-1 Insurance Company SP; (ii)

Greystone Insurance Company SP; (iii) Prewett Insurance SP; (iv) Smart Insure SP; and (v) 

Triangle RGK SP. In accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 2002 and Local Rule 9010-1, all parties 

are requested to serve copies of any and all motions, pleadings, reports and/or documents of any 

kind filed in these proceedings, whether filed by the Court, the Debtor, or any other party in 

interest, upon said counsel. 

In addition, it is respectfully requested that pursuant to Rule 2002(g), the following be 

added to the Court’s Mailing Matrix:

Paul J. Battista, Esq.

John H. Genovese, Esq.

Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A.

100 SE 2nd Street, 44th Floor

Miami, Florida 33131

Tel: (305) 349-2300

Email: pbattista@gjb-law.com

Email: jgenovese@gjb-law.com

Dated this 6th day of July 2021.

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 31 Filed 07/06/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted, 

GENOVESE JOBLOVE & BATTISTA, P.A.

Attorneys for Gen-1 Insurance Company SP, 

Greystone Insurance Company SP, 

Prewett Insurance SP, Smart Insure SP, and 

Triangle RGK SP 

100 Southeast 2nd Street, Suite 4400

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 349-2300

Facsimile: (305) 349-2310

By: /s/ Paul J. Battista

Paul J. Battista, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 884162

pbattista@gjb-law.com

John H. Genovese, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 280852 

jgenovese@gjb-law.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance 

has been served via CM/ECF Notification to all parties registered to receive electronic notice on 

this 6th day of July 2021.

By: /s/ Paul J. Battista

Paul J. Battista, Esq. 

Case 21-12609-AJC Doc 31 Filed 07/06/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30310]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 21-10749-RAM Doc 2 Filed 01/28/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-10749-RAM Doc 2 Filed 01/28/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-10749-RAM Doc 2 Filed 01/28/21 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Trace elements in moose (Alces alces) found dead in Northwestern Minnesota, USA      

      January 1, 2004    

The moose (Alces alces) population in bog and forest areas of Northwestern Minnesota has declined for more than 25 years, and more recently the decline is throughout Northwestern Minnesota. Both deficiencies and elevations in trace elements have been linked to the health of moose worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trace element toxicity or deficiency may have contributed to the decline of moose in Northwestern Minnesota. Livers of 81 moose found dead in Northwestern Minnesota in 1998 and 1999 were analyzed for trace elements. With the exception of selenium (Se) and copper (Cu), trace elements were not at toxic or deficient levels based on criteria set for cattle. Selenium concentrations in moose livers based on criteria set for cattle were deficient in 3.7% of livers and at a chronic toxicity level in 16% of livers. Copper concentrations based on criteria set for cattle were deficient in 39.5% of livers, marginally deficient in 29.5% of livers and adequate in 31% of livers. Moose from agricultural areas had higher concentrations, on average, of Cd, Cu, Mo and Se in their livers than moose from bog and forest areas. Older moose had higher concentrations of Cd and Zn, and lower concentrations of Cu than younger moose. Copper deficiency, which has been associated with population declines of moose in Alaska and Sweden, may be a factor contributing to the decline of moose in Northwestern Minnesota. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Thomas Custer  (Former Employee)          

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

## Related Content

####             Thomas Custer  (Former Employee)          

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center          

2630 Fanta Reed RoadLa Crosse, WI54603United States

(608) 783-6451

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Minnesota

View All **
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 504 

To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided by reason of 

a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2015 

Mr. LATTA (for himself and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To clarify that no express or implied warranty is provided 

by reason of a disclosure relating to voluntary participation in the Energy Star program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Star Program 

5 Integrity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO WARRANTY. 

7 Section 324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 6294a) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new subsection: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 504 IH

1 ‘‘(e) NO WARRANTY.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any disclosure relating to 

3 participation of a product in the Energy Star pro4 gram shall not create an express or implied warranty 

5 or give rise to any private claims or rights of action 

6 under State or Federal law relating to the disquali7 fication of that product from Energy Star if— 

8 ‘‘(A) the product has been certified by a 

9 certification body recognized by the Energy 

10 Star program; 

11 ‘‘(B) the Administrator has approved cor12 rective measures, including a determination of 

13 whether or not consumer compensation is ap14 propriate; and 

15 ‘‘(C) the responsible party has fully com16 plied with all approved corrective measures. 

17 ‘‘(2) CONSTRUAL.—Nothing in this subsection 

18 shall be construed to require the Administrator to 

19 modify any procedure or take any other action.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.8


 


 




AMENDMENT NO. 3


TO THE


RAI 401K SAVINGS PLAN












THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 to the RAI 401k Savings Plan (the “Plan”), restated as of January 20, 2015, is made and entered into the 10th day of November, 2015.  The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective as of the dates set forth below.







W I T N E S S E T H:







WHEREAS, Reynolds American Inc. (“RAI”) maintains the Plan for the benefit of its employees and its subsidiaries and affiliates designated as participating companies; and







WHEREAS, the RAI Employee Benefits Committee (the “Committee”),  by actions taken on November 10, 2015, authorized amendments to the Plan to (i) permit qualified nonelective employer contributions and (ii) clarify the retirement enhancement contribution for certain employees; and







WHEREAS, such actions of the Committee further authorized the members of the Committee to perform any and all acts and execute any and all documents that they may deem necessary to effectuate the Committee’s resolutions;







NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan hereby is amended as follows:







1.







Effective as of May 1, 2015, the proviso at the end of Section 3.03(b)(ii)(A) is hereby amended in its entirety, to read as follows:







“provided, however, that clause (ii)(A) above shall not apply to an eligible Participant (x) whose date of reemployment is after January 1, 2004 but whose Continuous Service Date is prior to January 1, 2004; or (y) whose employment was transferred from R. J. Reynolds Tobacco (CI) Co., and whose first date of employment with R. J. Reynolds Tobacco (CI) Co. or most recent date of reemployment with R. J. Reynolds Tobacco (CI) Co. is prior to January 1, 2004.”







2.







Effective as of January 1, 2015, Section 3.03 of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting the following new subsection (f) at the end thereof:








		“(f)	
Qualified Nonelective Contributions.  The Participating Companies may contribute a Qualified Nonelective Contribution to the Company Contribution Account of such Participants in such amounts as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, all such Qualified Nonelective Contributions shall be fully vested and nonforfeitable when made and shall be subject to the same distribution limitations as Pre-Tax Contributions (but are not eligible for withdrawal pursuant to Section 8.04).”












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned member of the Committee has executed this Amendment No. 3 as of the day and year first written above.


 


 



	 	
RAI Employee Benefits Committee

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Constantine E. Tsipis    	 
	 	 	Constantine E. Tsipis	 
	 	 	Secretary
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No. 20-20259-RAM 

 (Jointly Administered) 

It’Sugar FL I LLC, et al., 

 Chapter 11 

 Debtors. 

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS’ MOTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1121(d) OF THE 

BANKRUPTCY CODE FOR AN EXTENSION OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO FILE A 

PLAN OF REORGANIZATION AND 

TO SOLICIT ACCEPTANCES 

THIS MATTER came before the court on January 11, 2021, 10:00 a.m., upon the

Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to Section 1121(d) of the Bankruptcy Code for an Extension of 

Exclusive Right to File a Plan of Reorganization and to Solicit Acceptances [ECF No. 206] (the 

“Motion”). The Court having reviewed the Motion, the Court file and based upon the reasons set 

forth on the record which are incorporated here by reference, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein. 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 19, 2021.

Case 20-20259-RAM Doc 229 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

2. The Debtors’1 exclusive period within which only the Debtors may file a plan is 

extended, pursuant to section 1121(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, through and including March 23, 

2021. 

3. The Debtors’ exclusive period within which the Debtors may solicit acceptances 

of a plan is extended, pursuant to section 1121(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, through and including 

May 21, 2021. 

4. The extensions granted by this Order are without prejudice to the Debtors’ right to 

seek further extensions from this Court. 

5. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from 

or related to the implementation, interpretation and enforcement of this Order. 

### 

Submitted By: 

Joshua W. Dobin, Esquire 

Florida Bar No. 93696 

jdobin@melandbudwick.com

MELAND BUDWICK, P.A. 

Counsel for Debtors in Possession 

3200 Southeast Financial Center 

200 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 358-6363 

Telefax: (305) 358-1221 

Copies Furnished To: 

Joshua W. Dobin, Esquire, is directed to serve copies of this Order on all parties in interest and 

to file a Certificate of Service. 

1 All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Motion.

 

Case 20-20259-RAM Doc 229 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 14.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 000-51196 on form S-8 of our report dated
March 12, 2008, relating to the financial statements of AIXTRON Aktiengesellschaft, and the effectiveness of AIXTRON Aktiengesellschaft's internal control over financial reporting appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F of AIXTRON Aktiengesellschaft for the year ended December 31, 2007.

|                                                                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche GmbH WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftDeloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft |  | 

Duesseldorf,
Germany
March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 3/3/15 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: John Bradfield , EPA SUBJECT: 2/25/15 , Babcock and Wilcox Meeting Regarding Proposed C lean Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on 2/25/15 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** Matt Clowse, EPA Marshall Cohen, Babcock & Wilcox Jessica Holliday , Holliday Strategic Larry Hiner, Babcock & Wilcox Eric Smith, EPA Ry an Sims, EPA Kevin Culligan, EPA Reid Harvey , EPA Peter Tsirigotis, EPA John Bradfield, EPA Ely se Steiner, EPA Sara Ohrel, EPA Please see attached file s containing the sign in sheet and B&W Meeting Materials used in the meeting
.
Pleadro J. SCOTT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2720

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
To: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0204

From: Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office

Re: February 19, 2016 Call between EPA and SCAQMD regarding RECLAIM program

Attendees: EPA Region 9: Elizabeth Adams, Matthew Lakin, Nina Spiegelman, Jeanhee Hong, 

Andrew Steckel, Wienke Tax

South Coast Air Quality Management District (District): Philip Fine, William Wong

EPA requested a conference call with the District to explain the issues concerning RECLAIM raised by 

commenters on our proposed rule, and to ensure that our understanding of the issues was correct.