alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The value of US coral reefs for flood risk reduction      

      April 15, 2021    

Habitats, such as coral reefs, can mitigate increasing flood damages through coastal protection services. We provide a fine-scale, national valuation of the flood risk reduction benefits of coral habitats to people, property, economies and infrastructure. Across 3,100 km of US coastline, the top-most 1 m of coral reefs prevents the 100-yr flood from growing by 23% (113 km2), avoiding flooding to 53,800 (62%) people, US\$2.7 billion (90%) damage to buildings and US\$2.6 billion (49%) in indirect economic effects. We estimate the hazard risk reduction benefits of US coral reefs to exceed US$1.8 billion annually. Many highly developed coastlines in Florida and Hawaii receive annual benefits of over US\$10 million km–1, whereas US reefs critically reduce flooding of vulnerable populations. This quantification of spatial risk reduction can help to prioritize joint actions in flood management and environmental conservation, opening new opportunities to support reef management with hazard mitigation funding.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

#### Ann Gibbs

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

agibbs@usgs.gov

831-460-7540

####             Kristen Alkins (Former Employee)          

##### Physical Scientist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

## Related Content

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

#### Ann Gibbs

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

agibbs@usgs.gov

831-460-7540

####             Kristen Alkins (Former Employee)          

##### Physical Scientist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States

View All **
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2007-NM-165-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60548

Summary Calendar

SHIVA SHARMA

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A97 518 705

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shiva Sharma petitions this court to review a Notice of Intent to Issue a

Final Administrative Removal Order issued by the Department of Homeland

Security (DHS). The Notice of Intent charged Sharma with being removable

based on prior aggravated felony convictions. Sharma argues that his state

convictions for identity theft in the first degree, in violation of N. Y. PENAL LAW

§ 190.80, do not qualify as aggravated felonies for immigration purposes.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-60548

2

Respondent contends that this court lacks jurisdiction over the petition for

review because it does not seek review of a final order of removal.

This court examines questions related to its own jurisdiction de novo. See

Balogun v. Ashcroft, 270 F.3d 274, 277 (5th Cir. 2001). By statute, this court has

jurisdiction to review only final orders of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a); cf.

Moreira v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 709, 712-14 (5th Cir. 2007). By its very terms, the

Notice of Intent from which Sharma seeks review is not a final order of removal.

Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to review it.

Accordingly,the petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Valeria Andrea WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1005

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

Section 32 Certification

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Innovation  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby certifies
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of the
       Company.

Dated:    September 29, 2004

By: /s/ Robert Blagman
    ------------------------
    Robert Blagman
    Chief Executive Officer


                                       20
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 49304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 231

[DFARS Case 96-D334]


Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Restructuring Costs

Correction

    In rule document 96-31100, beginning on page 64635, in the issue of 
Friday, December 6, 1996, make the following correction:


231.205-70  [Corrected]

    On page 64636, in the first column, in paragraph (c)(3)(ii), the 
third line, ``defense'' should read ``Defense''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 199

[DoD 6010.8-R]
RIN 0720-AA29


Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS); Clarification of the CHAMPUS Exclusion of Unproven Drugs, 
Devices, and Medical Treatments and Procedures

Correction

    In rule document 97-101, beginning on page 625, in the issue of 
Monday, January 6, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 625, in the third column, in the DATES: section, ``February 
5, 1996'' should read ``February 5, 1997''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2004255EN.01000701.xml

| 15.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3547 — BANCO SANTANDER/ABBEY NATIONAL)

(2004/C 255/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3547. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3547. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10113]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1926


Scaffolds

CFR Correction

    In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926, revised 
as of July 1, 1997, on page 311, second column, in the last line of the 
effective date note, the bold text reading, ``Training requirements'' 
should be removed. The following section number and heading should 
precede the text following the effective date note.


Sec. 1926.454  Training requirements.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350),
the undersigned officer of Sysview Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB/A-1") of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A-1 fairly presents,
in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


                                                     /s/ Darwin Hu
Date:  August 16, 2006
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Devoran ELLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4028

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seasonally active frost-dust avalanches on a north polar scarp of Mars captured by HiRISE      

      January 1, 2008    

North-polar temporal monitoring by the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) orbiting Mars has discovered new, dramatic examples that Mars1 CO2-dominated seasonal volatile cycle is not limited to quiet deposition and sublimation of frost. In early northern martian spring, 2008, HiRISE captured several cases of CO2 frost and dust cascading down a steep, polar scarp in discrete clouds. Analysis of morphology and process reveals these events to be similar to terrestrial powder avalanches, sluffs, and falls of loose, dry snow. Potential material sources and initiating mechanisms are discussed in the context of the Martian polar spring environment and of additional, active, aeolian processes observed on the plateau above the scarp. The scarp events are identified as a trigger for mass wasting of bright, fractured layers within the basal unit, and may indirectly influence the retreat rate of steep polar scarps in competing ways.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Chris H Okubo, PhD

##### Deputy Center Director and Research Operations Lead

Astrogeology Science Center

cokubo@usgs.gov

928-556-7009

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Chris H Okubo, PhD

##### Deputy Center Director and Research Operations Lead

Astrogeology Science Center

cokubo@usgs.gov

928-556-7009

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 28, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 33462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80628]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 171


Revision of Fee Schedules; 100% Fee Recovery, FY 1995

Correction

    In rule document 95-14879 beginning on page 32218 in the issue of 
Tuesday, June 20, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 32231, in Table IV, in the last column, ``108 reactors= 
$2,427,000 per reactor'' which now appears as the text of footnote 3 
should have appeared as the last entry in the table.


Sec. 171.16  [Corrected]

    2. On page 32245, in the second column, in Sec. 171.16(c), in the 
table, in the first column, the first five lines should read ``Small 
businesses not engaged in manufacturing and small not-for-profit''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 157-1    Filed 03/18/21    Page 1 of 3

Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 157-1    Filed 03/18/21    Page 2 of 3

Case 20-21883-SMG    Doc 157-1    Filed 03/18/21    Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2123

In Re: JOHNNIE GATHERS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (9:09-cv-01295-HMH-BM)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Gathers, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Johnnie Gathers petitions this court for an injunction
in which he seeks to have his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

removed from the United States District Court for the District

of South Carolina. The record reveals that the district court
has issued a final order in that case, and Gathers has appealed.
We therefore deny Gathers’ petition as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4984 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the 

Army to produce, treat, manage, and use natural gas located under 

Fort Knox, Kentucky, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2016 

Mr. GUTHRIE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the Army to produce, treat, manage, and use 

natural gas located under Fort Knox, Kentucky, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRODUCTION AND USE OF NATURAL GAS AT 

4 FORT KNOX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 449 of title 10, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new section: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4984 IH

1 ‘‘§ 4781. Natural gas: production, treatment, manage2 ment, and use at Fort Knox, Kentucky 

3 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—(1) The Secretary of the Army 

4 may provide for the production, treatment, management, 

5 and use of natural gas located under Fort Knox, Ken6 tucky, without regard to section 3 of the Mineral Leasing 

7 Act for Acquired Lands (30 U.S.C. 352). 

8 ‘‘(2) The Secretary is authorized to enter into a con9 tract with an appropriate entity to carry out paragraph 

10 (1). 

11 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON USES.—Any natural gas pro12 duced under subsection (a) may be used only to support 

13 activities and operations at Fort Knox and may not be 

14 sold for use elsewhere. 

15 ‘‘(c) OWNERSHIP OF FACILITIES.—The Secretary of 

16 the Army may take ownership of any gas production and 

17 treatment equipment and facilities and associated infra18 structure from an entity with which the Secretary has en19 tered into a contract under subsection (a) in accordance 

20 with the terms of the contract. 

21 ‘‘(d) APPLICABILITY.—The authority of the Sec22 retary of the Army under this section is effective as of 

23 August 2, 2007.’’. 

24 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

25 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

26 at the end the following new item: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4984 IH

‘‘4781. Natural gas: production, treatment, management, and use at Fort Knox, 

Kentucky.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

57161

Vol. 63, No. 206

Monday, October 26, 1998

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

[CPSC Docket No. 99–C0002]

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., a

Corporation; Provisional Acceptance

of a Settlement Agreement and Order

Correction

In notice document 98–27990,

beginning on page 55847, in the issue of

Monday, October 19, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 55848, in the first column, in

paragraph 4., in the first line, ‘‘1998’’

should read ‘‘1988’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RM95–9–003]

Open Access Same-time Information

System (OASIS) and Standards of

Conduct; Notice of Filing of Proposed

Standards for Transmission Path

Naming and Request for Comments

Correction

In notice document 98–28004,

appearing on page 56022, in the issue of

Tuesday, October 20, 1998, the docket

number is added to read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 107 and 108

[Docket No. 28859; Amendment No. 107–

12, 108–17]

RIN 2120–AG32

Employment History, Verification and

Criminal History Records Check

Correction

In rule document 98–25210,

beginning on page 51204, in the issue of

Thursday, September 24, 1998, make

the following corrections:

1. On page 51204, in the third

column, in the tenth line from the

bottom, ‘‘that’’ should read ‘‘the’’.

2. On page 51206, in the first column,

in the first full paragraph, in the fourth

line from the bottom, ‘‘of’’ should read

‘‘or’’.

§ 107.31 [Corrected]

3. On page 51218, in the third

column, § 107.31 (c), in the third line,

‘‘competed’’ should read ‘‘completed’’.

4. On page 51219, in the third

column, in § 107.31 (h)(2), in the first

line, ‘‘not’’ should read ‘‘no’’.

§ 108.33 [Corrected]

5. On page 51222, in the second

column, in § 108.33 (j)(2), in the third

line, ‘‘(d)’’ should read ‘‘(a)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Digimarc Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Bruce Davis, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/  BRUCE DAVIS |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Bruce Davis                |   |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer*  |   |   |
| March 13, 2006        |   |   |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


(18
      U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
      officer of Document Capture Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      ("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
      belief, that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Form
      10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
                May 15, 2008*/s/* *David
                P. Clark*David
                P. Clark,Chief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
      Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of
  Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the
  year ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  Linux Gold Corp.

Richmond, BC, Canada

by: /s/ John G. Robertson

March 28, 2007

John G. Robertson 
  President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---