alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 19,2012 

Document Management Facility 

US Dept of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Document 2012-0350 

Dear Committee members, 

I am a FAA certified commercial pilot with approximately 5400 hours and I typically fly 150 

hours each year. 

This letter is in support of the FAA proposal to exempt recreational pilots from being required to 

obtain 3rd class physical exams from FAA AMEs as now required under FAR 61.23. 

This proposal would allow the exemption for private and recreational pilots who are limited to 

flying a 180 HP aircraft or less, 4 seats or less, and to only fly daylight VFR. 

These limitations restrict the flying to fun only purposes. Night flying, IFR flights, and other 

business-related flights would still require a Class III exam. 

Research has shown that LSA pilots (exempt from an FAA medical) are not at risk for medical 

emergencies while flying. Flying for fun, using the pilot's own determination if he/she is 

physically fit has shown it does not present any adverse medical risk for pilots. 

Also this will reduce the cost of flying for about 100,000 pilots by eliminating the expensive 

FAA required physical exam. 

Therefore, I endorse this recommendation and hope the FAA will approve this proposal. 

Carl A. Spar 

116 Riverbend Road 

Branson, MO 65616 

417 337-8161 

csparks002@centurytel.net
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 122 (Monday, June 26, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 33034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40626]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 2525-004, 2595-005, 2522-002, 2546-001, 2560-001, 2581-
002]


Wisconsin Public Service Corp.; Notice of Intent to Prepare a 
Multiple-Project Environmental Impact Statement and to Conduct Site 
Visits and Public Scoping Meetings

Correction

    In notice document 95-14970 beginning on page 32148, in the issue 
of Tuesday, June 20, 1995, in the third column, the project numbers 
should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# L_2005238DE.01002601.xml

| 15.9.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 238/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 238/26

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2005/513/EG der Kommission vom 11. Juli 2005 über die harmonisierte Nutzung von Funkfrequenzen in den 5-GHz-Bändern für die Einführung drahtloser Zugangssysteme einschließlich lokaler Funknetze (WAS/Funk-LANs)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 187 vom 19. Juli 2005
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 187 vom 19. Juli 2005

Seite 23, Artikel 1:

anstatt:

„Ziel dieser Entscheidung ist die Vereinheitlichung der Bedingungen für die Verfügbarkeit und effiziente Nutzung der Frequenzbänder 5 250-5 350 MHz und 5 470-5 725 MHz für drahtlose Zugangssysteme einschließlich lokaler Funknetze (WAS/Funk-LANs).“

muss es heißen:

„Ziel dieser Entscheidung ist die Vereinheitlichung der Bedingungen für die Verfügbarkeit und effiziente Nutzung der Frequenzbänder 5 150-5 350 MHz und 5 470-5 725 MHz für drahtlose Zugangssysteme einschließlich lokaler Funknetze (WAS/Funk-LANs).“

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Test of a modified habitat suitability model for bighorn sheep      

      January 1, 2000    

Translocation of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) is time, labor, and cost intensive and, therefore, high levels of success are desirable. We tested a widely used habitat suitability model against translocation success and then modified it to include additional factors which improved its usefulness in predicting appropriate translocation sites. The modified Smith habitat suitability model for bighorn sheep was 64% accurate in predicting success or failure of 32 translocations of bighorn sheep into the Rocky Mountains, Colorado Plateau desert, and prairie-badlands of six states. We had sheep location data for 13 populations, and the modified habitat model predicted the areas used by bighorn sheep with greater than 90% accuracy in eight populations, greater than 55% accuracy in four populations, and less than 55% accuracy in one population. Translocations were more successful when sheep were placed into discrete habitat patches containing a high proportion of lambing period habitat (>10% of suitable habitat, p = 0.05), where animals had a migratory tendency (p = 0.02), no contact with domestic sheep (p = 0.02), or greater distance to domestic sheep (>23 km, p = 0.02). Rate of population growth was best predicted by area of lambing period habitat, potential area of winter range, and distance to domestic sheep. We retested the model using these refined criteria and the refined model then predicted success or failure of these 32 translocated populations with 82% accuracy.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Badlands National Park
                  -  Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area
                  -  Canyonlands National Park
                  -  Capitol Reef National Park
                  -  Colorado National Monument
                  -  Curecanti National Recreation Area
                  -  Dinosaur National Monument
                  -  Gunnison National Forest
                  -  Mesa Verde National Park
                  - Colorado
                  -  Montana
                  -  South Dakota
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Trends and status of flow, nutrients, and sediments for selected nontidal sites in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, 1985-98      

      September 1, 2000    

View Document

Data from 30 stream sites in nontidal portions of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed were analyzed to document annual nutrient and sediment loads and trends for the period 1985 through 1998 as part of an annual water-quality update for the Chesapeake Bay Program. Annual loads were estimated by use of the U.S. Geological Survey ESTIMATOR model and are available upon request. Trends were estimated by use of either linear regression, Seasonal Kendall, or Kendall-Theil tests. Trends were reported for monthly-mean flow, monthly load, flow-adjusted concentration, and flow-weighted concentration. Mean yields and median concentrations were calculated to help assess current water-quality status and to facilitate comparisons between basins. The trend in flow was upward at 12 of the 30 sites. Trends of nutrient and sediment load were upward at these same 12 sites. Trends in flow-adjusted and flow-weighted concentrations varied by species. Trends in flow-weighted concentrations were generally upward or not significant for the nitrogen species and parallel or not significant for phosphorus species. Trends in flow-adjusted concentrations were downward at nearly all sites for sediment and dissolved solids in the Susquehanna and Potomac River Basins and generally were not significant in the Virginia river basins.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Lori Sprague

##### Program Manager, Integrated Water Availability Assessments

Water Resources Mission Area

lsprague@usgs.gov

303-236-6921

## Related Content

#### Lori Sprague

##### Program Manager, Integrated Water Availability Assessments

Water Resources Mission Area

lsprague@usgs.gov

303-236-6921

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pennsylvania Water Science Center          

215 Limekiln RoadNew Cumberland, PA17070United States

717-730-6900 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Susquehanna River Basin;Choptank River Basin;Western Shore River Basin;Patuxent River Basin;Potomac River Basin;Rappahannock River Basin;Mattaponi River Basin;Pamunkey River Basin;James River Basin;Appomattox River Basin
                  - Delaware;Maryl;New York;Pennsylvania;Virginia;West Virginia
                  - Delaware
                  - Maryl
                  - New York
                  - Pennsylvania
                  - Virginia
                  - West Virginia
                  - Susquehanna River basin
                  - Choptank River Basin
                  - Western Shore River Basin
                  - Patuxent River Basin
                  - potomac river basin
                  - rappahannock river basin
                  - Mattaponi River Basin
                  - Pamunkey River Basin
                  - james river basin
                  - Appomattox River Basin

View All **
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-66648) and Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-34238, 333-34240, 333-55096 and 333-82276) of Edison Schools, Inc. of
our report dated September 12, 2003, except for the ninth paragraph of Note 8,
as to which the date is September 29, 2003, relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
September 29, 2003
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

232

Vol. 61, No. 2

Wednesday, January 3, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission and the Puerto Rico

Planning Board

[FERC Docket No. CP95-35-000; PRPB

Docket No. 94-62-1219-JPM]

EcoEle ́ctrica, L.P.; Notice of Comment

Period Extension

Correction

In notice document 95–31123

appearing on page 66543 in the issue of

Friday, December 22, 1995, the Docket

numbers should have appeared as set

forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 50

RIN 3150–AD57

Fracture Toughness Requirements for

Light Water Reactor Pressure Vessels

Correction

In rule document 95–30665 beginning

on page 65456 in the issue of Tuesday,

December 19, 1995, make the following

correction:

PART 50—[CORRECTED]

On page 65468, in the first column, in

the authority citation for Part 50, in the

first paragraph, in the fourth line, ‘‘83

Stat. 1444’’ should read ‘‘83 Stat. 444’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–ASO–23]

Removal of Class E Airspace; Marietta,

GA

Correction

In rule document 95–30919 appearing

on page 65526 in the issue of

Wednesday, December 20, 1995, make

the following correction:

In the first column, under EFFECTIVE

DATE:, in the first line, ‘‘9091’’ should

read ‘‘0901’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Denis Law 

Mayor 

Office of the City Attorney - Lawrence J. Warren 

12 February 2015 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Attention FAA PART 16 Docket Clerk, AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Senior Assistant City Attorneys 

Mark Barber 

Zanetta LFontes 

Garmon Newsom II 

Prosecuting Attorneys 

Shawn E. Arthur 

Alex Tuttle 

Eddie J. Aubrey 

Iva Clark 

RE: Part 16 Complaint: Pro-Flight Aviation v. City of Renton 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am a Senior Assistant City Attorney forthe City of Renton. I am writing to object to the Service 

of the Complaint in.the above referenced matter. 14 CFR 16.15(a) requires service on the parties. The 

City of Renton is named as.the responding party. Accordingly, service needed to be made on the City of 

Renton. 

According to Complainant's Certificate of Service, the Complaint was served on my office (the 

City Attorney's office). I acknowledge that it arrived by Federal Express on January 30, 2015. However, 

as the city's attorney, I am not authorized to accept any form of service on the City of Renton. I am 

hereby objecting to this service. 

I have waited for approximately two (2) weeks to allow documents to be served properly . . I have 

verified with the City Clerk's office as well as the Mayor's office (the only two locations that can accept 

service on behalf of the City of Renton) that, to date, no service has. been made upon them. 

I am, by copy of this letter, notifying Complainant of the City's objection to the service of the 

Complaint. 

cc: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administration 

Jonathan Wilson, Airport Manager 

Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 

Very truly yours 

\~ ior Assistant City Attorney 

1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • (425) 430·6480 I Fax (425) 430·6498 • rentonwa.gov 
Denis Law 

Mayor 

Office of the City Attorney -Lawrence J. Warren 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Senior Assistant City Attorneys 

Mark Barber 

Zan etta L. Fontes 

Gormon Newsom II 

Prosecuting Attorneys 

Shawn E. Arthur 

Alex Tuttle 

Eddie J. Aubrey 

Iva Clark 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the Jorcgoing letter, objecting to the 

service of Part J 6 Complaint, on the following persons at the following addresses by 

United States Post&! Service: 

Ofllce of the Chief Counsel 

Attention FAA PART 16 Docket Clerk. AGC-600 

Federal Avi&tion Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington. DC 2059 I 

And 

Bernard Pahoikc 

Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. 

750 Perimeter Road, Unit# 1 

Renton, W A 98057 

Dated this 12'11 day of February. 2015 

! a t-t.~ tt~/~-£1:0 \..._../ '-'~ l. Zan · ta L. Fontes 

Se ror Assistant City Attomey 

1 055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • (425) 430-6480 I fax (425) 430-6498 • rentonwa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4958 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4958

To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update a report on the 
     energy and environmental benefits of the re-refining of used 
                            lubricating oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2016

  Mrs. Brooks of Indiana (for herself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Energy to review and update a report on the 
     energy and environmental benefits of the re-refining of used 
                            lubricating oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY SAVINGS FROM LUBRICATING OIL.

    Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency and the Director of Management and 
Budget, shall--
            (1) review and update the report prepared pursuant to 
        section 1838 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005;
            (2) after consultation with relevant Federal, State, and 
        local agencies and affected industry and stakeholder groups, 
        update data that was used in preparing that report; and
            (3) prepare and submit to Congress a coordinated Federal 
        strategy to increase the beneficial reuse of used lubricating 
        oil, that--
                    (A) is consistent with national policy as 
                established pursuant to section 2 of the Used Oil 
                Recycling Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-463); and
                    (B) addresses measures needed to--
                            (i) increase the responsible collection of 
                        used oil;
                            (ii) disseminate public information 
                        concerning sustainable reuse options for used 
                        oil; and
                            (iii) promote sustainable reuse of used oil 
                        by Federal agencies, recipients of Federal 
                        grant funds, entities contracting with the 
                        Federal Government, and the general public.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                DBA                        JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                ---                        -----------------------------
<S>                                       <C>                        <C>
ALEC Acquisition Sub Corp.                                           Delaware
ACS of the Northland, Inc.                ACS, ACS Local Service     Alaska
ACS of Alaska, Inc.                       ACS, ACS Local Service     Alaska
ACS of Fairbanks, Inc.                    ACS, ACS Local Service     Alaska
ACS of Anchorage, Inc.                    ACS, ACS Local Service     Delaware
ACS Wireless, Inc.                                                   Alaska
ACS Long Distance, Inc.                   ACS, ACS Long Distance     Alaska
ATU LD License Sub, Inc.                                             Delaware
ATU Communications, Inc.                                             Alaska
Pacific Telecom of Alaska PCS, Inc.                                  Alaska
Peninsula Cellular Services, Inc.                                    Alaska
ACS Television, LLC                                                  Utah
ACS Internet, Inc.                                                   Delaware
ACS Messaging, Inc.                                                  Alaska
ACS Infosource, Inc.                                                 Alaska
ACS of Alaska License Sub, Inc.                                      Alaska
ACS of the Northland License Sub, Inc.                               Alaska
ACS of Fairbanks License Sub, Inc.                                   Alaska
ACS of Anchorage License Sub, Inc.                                   Alaska
ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc.                                       Alaska
ACS Long Distance License Sub, Inc                                   Alaska
ACS Television License Sub, Inc                                      Alaska
</TABLE>



                                       54
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4960 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

525 N Broadway in Aurora, Illinois, as the ‘‘Kenneth M. Christy Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2016 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 525 N Broadway in Aurora, Illinois, as the 

‘‘Kenneth M. Christy Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KENNETH M. CHRISTY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 525 N Broadway in Aurora, Illi6 nois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Kenneth M. 

7 Christy Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4960 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Kenneth M. Christy 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Surveillance for high pathogenicity avian influenza virus in wild birds in the Pacific Flyway of the United States, 2006-2007      

      January 1, 2009    

In 2006 the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Interior, and cooperating state fish and wildlife agencies began surveillance for high-pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus in wild birds in the Pacific Flyway of the United States. This surveillance effort was highly integrated in California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, and western Montana, with collection of samples coordinated with state agencies. Sampling focused on live wild birds, hunterkilled waterfowl during state hunting seasons, and wild bird mortality events. Of 20,888 samples collected, 18,139 were from order Anseriformes (waterfowl) and 2010 were from order Charadriiformes (shorebirds), representing the two groups of birds regarded to be the primary reservoirs of avian influenza viruses. Although 83 birds were positive by H5 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), no HPAI H5N1 virus was found. Thirty-two virus isolates were obtained from the H5- positive samples, including low-pathogenicity H5 viruses identified as H5N2, H5N3, and H5N9.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Robert Dusek

##### Wildlife Biologist/Epidemiologist

National Wildlife Health Center

rdusek@usgs.gov

608-270-2403

#### Hon Ip

##### Diagnostic Virologist

National Wildlife Health Center

hip@usgs.gov

608-270-2464

## Related Content

#### Robert Dusek

##### Wildlife Biologist/Epidemiologist

National Wildlife Health Center

rdusek@usgs.gov

608-270-2403

#### Hon Ip

##### Diagnostic Virologist

National Wildlife Health Center

hip@usgs.gov

608-270-2464

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Utah
                  -  Washington

View All **