alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4917 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4917

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to terminate the essential air 
                service program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2016

 Mr. Russell (for himself, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Bishop of Michigan, Mr. 
Buck, Mr. Palmer, and Mr. Ribble) introduced the following bill; which 
   was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to terminate the essential air 
                service program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Free Market Flights Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 41749. Termination of essential air service program
    ``(a) In General.--The authority of the Secretary of Transportation 
to carry out the essential air service program under this subchapter 
shall terminate on October 1, 2016.
    ``(b) Use of Fees for Deficit Reduction.--
            ``(1) In general.--For fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 2016, amounts credited to the account established 
        under section 45303 from overflight fees authorized under 
        section 45301(a)(1) that would otherwise be made available 
        under section 41742 for obligation and expenditure to carry out 
        the essential air service program under this subchapter shall 
        be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury and shall be 
        used for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
            ``(2) Statutory construction.--Paragraph (1) shall apply 
        notwithstanding any provision of section 45303(c) that directs 
        the amounts described in paragraph (1) to be made available for 
        expenditure for activities of the Federal Aviation 
        Administration.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 417 of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
section 41748 the following:

``41749. Termination of essential air service program.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20630]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 125 / Monday, June 30, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 35247]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-1238-000]


CSW Power Marketing, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

Correction

    In notice document 97-16376 beginning on page 33850 in the issue of 
Monday, June 23, 1997 make the following correction:
    On page 33850, in the third column, in the second document, the 
docket number should read as set forth above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to therequirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Paul L. Berns, the President and Chief Executive Officer of AllosTherapeutics, Inc., and David C. Clark, the Vice President, Finance of AllosTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

1.             TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 7,2007
|        | /s/ Paul L.  Berns                            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul L. Berns                                 |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer        |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                |
|   |                                          |
|   |                                          |
|   | /s/ David C.  Clark                           |
|   | David C. Clark                                |
|   | Vice President,  Finance                      |
|   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed originalof this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsStaff upon request.  This certification “accompanies”the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities andExchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing.

----
Denis Law Mayor

Office ofthe City Attorney - Lawrence 

### J.Warren

12 February 2015 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Attention FAA PART 16 Docket Clerk, AGC-600 Federal Aviation Administration 800 IndependenceAvenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber Zanetta LFontes Garmon Newsom II Prosecuting Attorneys Shawn E.Arthur AlexTuttle Eddie J. Aubrey Iva Clark

RE: Part 16 Complaint: Pro-Flight Aviation v. City of Renton Dear Sir or Madam: I am a Senior Assistant City Attorney forthe City of Renton. I am writing to object to the Service ofthe Complaint in.the above referenced matter. 14 CFR 16.15(a) requires service on the parties. The City of Renton is named as.the responding party. Accordingly, service needed tobe made on the City of Renton.According to Complainant's Certificate of Service, the Complaint was served on my office (the CityAttorney's office). I acknowledge that it arrived by Federal Express on January 30, 2015. However, as the city's attorney, I am not authorized to accept any form of service on the City of Renton. I am hereby objecting to this service. I have waited for approximately two (2) weeks to allowdocuments to be served properly
. .

### I have verified with the City Clerk's office as well as the Mayor's office (the onlytwo locations that can accept service on behalf ofthe City of Renton) that, todate, no service has. been made upon them. I am, by copy ofthis letter, notifying Complainant ofthe City's objectionto the service ofthe Complaint.

cc: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administration Jonathan Wilson, Airport Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Very truly yours

### \~ ior Assistant City Attorney

1055 South GradyWay • Renton,Washington 98057 • (425)430·6480 I Fax (425) 430·6498 • rentonwa.govDenis Law Mayor

Office ofthe City Attorney -Lawrence J.Warren



## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber Zanetta L. Fontes Gormon Newsom II Prosecuting Attorneys Shawn E. Arthur Alex Tuttle Eddie J. Aubrey Iva Clark



### I hereby certify that I have this day served the Jorcgoing letter, objecting to the service ofPart J

### 6 Complaint, on the following persons 

### at the following addresses 

### by United States Post&! Service: Ofllce ofthe ChiefCounsel Attention FAA PART 16 Docket Clerk. AGC-600 Federal Avi&tion Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington. DC 2059 I And Bernard Pahoikc Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc. 750 Perimeter Road, Unit#1 Renton, WA 98057 Dated this 12'11 

### day ofFebruary. 2015 

# a

**tt~/~-£1:0** !

**t-t.~** 

### \..._../

**'-'~** 

# l. Zan · ta L. 

### Fontes Se ror Assistant City Attomey

1055 South GradyWay • Renton,Washington 98057 • (425) 430-6480 I fax (425) 430-6498 • rentonwa.gov
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2564
JOHN H. DOUGLAS; MARY E. DOUGLAS, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 96-21113) Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Douglas, Mary E. Douglas, Appellants Pro Se. Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Thomas James Sawyer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John H. and Mary E. Douglas appeal from the tax court’s orderdetermining deficiencies with respect to their 1992 and 1993 federal income tax liabilities. Our review of the record and the tax court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Douglas v. Commissioner , No. 96-21113 (U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 24, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0306 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM176AD
AMM R33 --- 2/15/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket **MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Robert Evans, Defendant.

Justice Court, Village of Spring Valley,

August 27, 1973.

*727
      *Robert R. Meehan, District Attorney (Reuben Ortenberg*of counsel), for plaintiff. *Becker & Moskoff (Arnold Becker*of counsel), for defendant.

Abnold P. Etblson", J.

Defendant was charged on February 7,1972 with driving while intoxicated in violation of subdivision 3 of section 1192 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and pursuant to his demand for a deposition, two long-form informations were filed on March 4, 1972 charging him with a violation of subdivisions 2 and 3, respectively, of that section. Defendant thereafter moved to dismiss the information for insufficiency, whereupon, on July 6, 1972, the complainant police officer, upon the direction of the Assistant District Attorney, filed a superseding information pursuant to CPL 100.45 charging two counts corresponding to the two subdivisions. The motion also requested that the two charges be consolidated under defendant’s theory that a conviction could not be had for both counts or charges.

The court is of the opinion that the informations are legally sufficient and so indicated orally before the trial of this action. Prior to the jury trial, defendant renewed his motion as to the consolidation which had not yet been determined by the court. The People have opposed such consolidation and at the trial, sought convictions on both counts. The court granted the People’s request to charge that the defendant could be found guilty of either or both counts. The jury returned a verdict finding defendant guilty of the subdivision 2 count for driving with in excess of 0.12% alcohol in his blood. The jury could not reach a verdict on the other count and the court, at the conclusion of the trial, granted the People’s motion to dismiss the count charging subdivision 3.

While it is clear that under the sentencing structure of section 70.25 of the Penal Law that a defendant cannot be given consecutive sentences on convictions based on the same unlawful acts, such provision does not preclude separate convictions. The Appellate Division, Third Department, in *People*v. *McDonough*
      *728(39 A D 2d 188) decided in a similar motion directed at an indictment on both counts that the separate subdivisions constituted separate crimes. Furthermore, section 1196 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law may not be read so as to force an election by the People as to which subdivision to prosecute. Bather, the proof or lack thereof may be sufficient to convict under a different subdivision than charged.

The motion is denied. Defendant is directed to appear for sentencing on September 20, 1973. This decision is deemed to be an order of this court.
Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 21 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 21 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-22980-AJC Doc 21 Filed 01/08/21 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 61290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-41129]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AH20


Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Ocean, NJ, 
Nonappropriated Fund Wage Area

Correction

    In rule document 95-26946 appearing on page 55423 in the issue of 
Wednesday, November 1, 1996 make the following correction:


Appendix D to Subpart D of Part 532  [Corrected]

    On page 55423, in the third column, in Appendix D to Subpart B of 
Part 532, the entry for New Jersey is corrected as follows:

Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and 
Survey Areas

* * * * *

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:

New Jersey:
    Atlantic
    Ocean
* * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Dynamics, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Charles E.
Phillips, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Charles E. Phillips
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles E. Phillips
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer

                                                     August 13, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The interior structure of Ceres as revealed by surface topography      

      October 1, 2017    

Ceres, the largest body in the asteroid belt (940 km diameter), provides a unique opportunity to study the interior structure of a volatile-rich dwarf planet. Variations in a planetary body's subsurface rheology and density affect the rate of topographic relaxation. Preferential attenuation of long wavelength topography (≥150 km) on Ceres suggests that the viscosity of its crust decreases with increasing depth. We present finite element (FE) geodynamical simulations of Ceres to identify the internal structures and compositions that best reproduce its topography as observed by the NASA Dawn mission. We infer that Ceres has a mechanically strong crust with maximum effective viscosity ∼1025 Pa s. Combined with density constraints, this rheology suggests a crustal composition of carbonates or phyllosilicates, water ice, and at least 30 volume percent (vol.%) low-density, high-strength phases most consistent with salt and/or clathrate hydrates. The inference of these crustal materials supports the past existence of a global ocean, consistent with the observed surface composition. Meanwhile, we infer that the uppermost ≥60 km of the silicate-rich mantle is mechanically weak with viscosity <1021 Pa s, suggesting the presence of liquid pore fluids in this region and a low temperature history that avoided igneous differentiation due to late accretion or efficient heat loss through hydrothermal processes.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael Bland, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist 

Astrogeology Science Center

mbland@usgs.gov

928-556-7080

## Related Content

#### Michael Bland, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist 

Astrogeology Science Center

mbland@usgs.gov

928-556-7080

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Progress and lessons learned from responses to landslide disasters      

      December 22, 2020    

Landslides have the incredible power to transform landscapes and also, tragically, to cause disastrous societal impacts. Whereas the mechanics and effects of many landslide disasters have been analyzed in detail, the means by which landslide experts respond to these events has garnered much less attention. Herein, we evaluate nine landslide response case histories conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey over the past two decades and summarize the event history, the response conducted, and the lessons learned from each event. We group the responses into three categories—providing event context from past events, addressing ongoing hazards, and acquiring data for the future—and present the nine case studies accordingly. We also summarize the progress in landslide response that has been made over the past two decades, including insights and advancements on the preparation for such events, the use of new technologies, and the importance of clear communication between all parties during disasters. We believe that exchanging and sharing experiences such as these will promote more clear and successful approaches for responses to landslide disasters in the future.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Brian Collins

##### Supervisory Research Civil Engineer

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

bcollins@usgs.gov

650-439-2466

#### Mark Reid

##### Research Hydrologist

California Volcano Observatory

mreid@usgs.gov

650-439-2891

#### Jeffrey Coe

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

jcoe@usgs.gov

303-273-8606

#### Jason Kean

##### Research Hydrologist

Landslide Hazards Program

jwkean@usgs.gov

303-273-8608

#### Rex Baum

##### Research Geologist Emeritus

Landslide Hazards Program

baum@usgs.gov

303-273-8610

#### Jonathan Godt

##### Landslide Hazards Program Coordinator

Natural Hazards Mission Area

jgodt@usgs.gov

303-273-8626

## Related Content

#### Brian Collins

##### Supervisory Research Civil Engineer

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

bcollins@usgs.gov

650-439-2466

#### Mark Reid

##### Research Hydrologist

California Volcano Observatory

mreid@usgs.gov

650-439-2891

#### Jeffrey Coe

##### Research Geologist

Landslide Hazards Program

jcoe@usgs.gov

303-273-8606

#### Jason Kean

##### Research Hydrologist

Landslide Hazards Program

jwkean@usgs.gov

303-273-8608

#### Rex Baum

##### Research Geologist Emeritus

Landslide Hazards Program

baum@usgs.gov

303-273-8610

#### Jonathan Godt

##### Landslide Hazards Program Coordinator

Natural Hazards Mission Area

jgodt@usgs.gov

303-273-8626

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States
Matrice 100-DJI Guidance System Mounting 

Warning 

FromDHWiki 

1. If you mount dl11 Guidance Scmson directly Ulldm the bat1sy c:ompadmlmt, diaconniiCt 1bll cable of the 

nm :liiCiDg Gnidmeo Sensor befom at!Wsing llut IDtelligent F1ipt Batt.wy. 

2. If you mount 1he side Gddmce SeDaolll above the cen~ frame, eDSUR: tbty ue moUDted at least 4 em 

above the cemer :~tame, 10 1hat 1he pzopeJlera will DOt obdNct lhl:m. Be aure to mount 1he down mciog 

Guidmcc Seasor\111dc:t the aircraft. Fmally, mount the GPS mount on top of the expemrion beyl!SiDg two 

M3x8 Ben:WII. 

112 
1011/2015 Matrica 100-DJI GLidance Sys1an Mounting Warning- DJI Wiki 

3. If you are using the DJI Zenmuse X3 Gimbal with Camera and the Dll Guidance system together, be 

sure to mount the side Guidance Sensors above the center frame, otherwise you will be unable to mount the 

front facing Guidance Sensor. 

Retrieved from "http:/ /wiki.dji.com/en/index.php?title=Matrice _1 00-

Dll _Guidance_ System_ Mounting_ Warning&oldid=23316" 

• This page was last modified on 21 July 2015, at 07: 17. 

• This page has been accessed 254 times. 

http://wi ki .dji .oom/en/i nclex.phptMatrice_100-DJI_ Guidance_Sys1em_Mounlirq_W arnirg 2/2
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Ytzhak Edelman, Chief Financial Officerof Ness Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005of the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        | /s/ YTZHAK  EDELMAN     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Ytzhak Edelman          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | March 14, 2006     |

 

----
Charles GWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.