alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

9486

Vol. 62, No. 41

Monday, March 3, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

[Docket No. 970129014-7014-01]

RIN 0651-XX09

Interim Guidelines for the Examination

of Claims Directed to Species of

Chemical Compositions Based Upon a

Single Prior Art Reference

Correction

In notice document 97–3362,

beginning on page 6217, in the issue of

Tuesday, February 11, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 6217, in the third column,

under SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION, in the 22nd line,

‘‘Thereof’’ should read ‘‘Therefore’’.

2. On page 6219, in the first column,

under heading no. 4, in the first

paragraph, in the sixth line, ‘‘hole’’

should read ‘‘whole’’.

3. On the same page, in the second

column, in the first full paragraph, in

the last line, ‘‘subgenus32’’ should read

‘‘subgenus.32’’.

4. On page 6221, in the second and

third columns, in footnotes 25, 28, 31,

33, 35, 38, 39, and 40, ‘‘Dillion’’ should

read ‘‘Dillon’’.

5. On page 6222, in the first, second,

and third columns, in footnotes 49, 50,

53, 54, and 57, ‘‘E.G.’’ should read

‘‘E.g.’’.

6. On the same page, in footnote 56,

the second full paragraph should begin

and end with quotation marks.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97-253-000]

Northern Border Pipeline Company;

Notice of Petition for Limited Waiver of

Tariff Provisions

Correction

In notice document 97–4680

appearing on page 8707 in the issue of

February 26, 1997, the docket number

should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP92-236-007]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company; Notice of Interim Refund

Correction

In notice document 97–4675

appearing on page 8708 in the issue of

February 26, 1997, the docket number

should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Potentiometric surfaces of November 1982 and declines in the potentiometric surfaces between the period prior to development and November 1982 for the coastal plain aquifers of South Carolina      

      January 1, 1985    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

Characteristics of the Coastal Plains aquifer of South Carolina are being studied as a part of the Regional Aquifer Systems Analysis program of the U.S. Geological Survey. A framework has been developed to best represent the hydrology of the State by dividing the aquifers into a system of five aquifers. This framework includes a surficial aquifer consisting of coastal terrace deposits, a limestone and stratigraphically equivalent sand aquifer of Eocene age, and three sand aquifers of Cretaceous age. (USGS)

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - South Carolina

View All **
D.M., Mother of J.C.D. and A.W.D., Children, Appellant, v. M.D., Father, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-473

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

Jonathan R. Simon, Orlando Legal, Orlando, for Appellant.

M.D., Coleman, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

D.M. appeals a final order denying her petition to terminate the parental rights of M.D., the biological father of their two children, in conjunction with a proceeding for a stepparent adoption under chapter 63, Florida Statutes (2015). D.M. argues that the trial court erred in failing to set forth specific findings of fact to support its conclusion that M.D. had not abandoned his children. She also contends that competent, substantial evidence supports terminating M.D.'s parental rights. We affirm.

D.M.'s petition sought to terminate M.D.'s parental rights based on his ninety-seven-month term of incarceration in prison followed by ten years of sex offender *714probation. D.M. alleged that M.D.'s term of incarceration constituted a significant portion of the children's minority. Alternatively, she contended that continuing the parental relationship with M.D. would be harmful to the children and, for this reason, termination of M.D.'s parental rights would be in the best interests of the children. *See* § 63.089(4)(b)1. & 3., Fla. Stat. (2015).

Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied D.M.'s petition.1 As D.M. correctly observes, the trial court's order does not include written findings addressing the criteria set forth in section 63.089(4), as required by section 63.089(5). However, the failure to make the required findings can constitute harmless error when, as here, our review is not hampered by their absence. *See**Williams v. Williams*, 923 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). After considering all the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses, the trial court concluded that M.D. had not abandoned his children. The trial court's order comes to this Court with a presumption of correctness. *Sunset Realty Corp. v. McDaniel*, 165 So.2d 782, 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). When, as here, there is competent, substantial evidence to support the trial judge's conclusion, it will be affirmed. *See**Bertman v. Solomon*, 166 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). We cannot reweigh the evidence. *Disston v. Hanson*, 116 So.3d 612, 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

1

The trial court's order erroneously referred to section 39.806(1), Florida Statutes (2015), to interpret "abandonment" instead of section 63.089(4). However, the error was harmless, as there is no significant difference in the analysis under either statute. *Compare* § 63.089(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015), *with* § 39.806(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2015).
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           UAV lidar and hyperspectral fusion for forest monitoring in the southwestern USA      

      June 15, 2017    

Forest vegetation classification and structure measurements are fundamental steps for planning, monitoring, and evaluating large-scale forest changes including restoration treatments. High spatial and spectral resolution remote sensing data are critically needed to classify vegetation and measure their 3-dimensional (3D) canopy structure at the level of individual species. Here we test high-resolution lidar, hyperspectral, and multispectral data collected from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and demonstrate a lidar-hyperspectral image fusion method in treated and control forests with varying tree density and canopy cover as well as in an ecotone environment to represent a gradient of vegetation and topography in northern Arizona, U.S.A. The fusion performs better (88% overall accuracy) than either data type alone, particularly for species with similar spectral signatures, but different canopy sizes. The lidar data provides estimates of individual tree height (R2 = 0.90; RMSE = 2.3 m) and crown diameter (R2 = 0.72; RMSE = 0.71 m) as well as total tree canopy cover (R2 = 0.87; RMSE = 9.5%) and tree density (R2 = 0.77; RMSE = 0.69 trees/cell) in 10 m cells across thin only, burn only, thin-and-burn, and control treatments, where tree cover and density ranged between 22 and 50% and 1–3.5 trees/cell, respectively. The lidar data also produces highly accurate digital elevation model (DEM) (R2 = 0.92; RMSE = 0.75 m). In comparison, 3D data derived from the multispectral data via structure-from-motion produced lower correlations with field-measured variables, especially in dense and structurally complex forests. The lidar, hyperspectral, and multispectral sensors, and the methods demonstrated here can be widely applied across a gradient of vegetation and topography for monitoring landscapes undergoing large-scale changes such as the forests in the southwestern U.S.A.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona

View All **
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Jetall Companies, Inc. v. Plummer

Appellate case number: 01-18-01091-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-00143

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Appellant Jetall Companies, Inc. filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of this 

Court’s October 6, 2020 opinion. The motion for reconsideration en banc is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Date: December 15, 2020
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      the Quarterly Report of Nathaniel Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




**VISTA
                INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**Date: May
                16, 2008
            By:
            */s/
                Timothy A. Peach*Timothy
                A. PeachChief
                Financial Officer
Jerry Neil ALFRED, Appellant, v. John A. BARFIELD, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 22-0583
RYAN ARION,

Petitioner,

v. JIM SALMONSEN, Warden, Montana State Prison.

Respondent. 

# OPIGINAI 1 1;ffirs album 

### OCT 2 5 2022
Bowen Greenwood Clark of Supreme Court state of Montana
ORDER

Representing himself, Ryan Arion has filed a Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus, requesting that this Court "inquire into whether the petitioner is unlawfully restrained of his liberty." After correctly citing the habeas corpus statutes, Arion puts forth that his appointed counsel "prejudiced"him because his counsel did not appeal his sentence upon revocation on Arion's request, causing "abandonment of appeal." Arion "implores this Courtto reverse the Judgment." Arion challenges his sentencefromthe Lewis andClark County District Court. We secured a copyofthejudgment,mostrecently amended in September2021. Arionpleaded guilty to felony accountability (theft— obtain or exerts unauthorized control over property exceeding $1,500 not exceeding $5,000-2' offense) in April 2021. The District Court committed Arion to the Department ofCorrections for a suspended, five-year term. The court ran his sentence consecutively to his prior sentence from Custer County District Court. SeeArion v. Salmonsen,No. OP 22-0192, Order (Mont. Jul. 19, 2022). Arion has not presented a prima facie case that he is unlawfully restrained. Miller
v. Eleventh Judicial District Ct., 2007 MT 58, ¶ 14, 336 Mont. 207, 154 P.3d 1186. He has not shown how his incarceration is illegal. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Moreover, Arion,who appears to be familiar with filing matters in this Court, could have sought and 10/25/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0583filed a timely appeal on his own behalf last year or sought leave to file an out-of-time

appeal. This Court cannot reverse hisjudgment through a writ ofhabeas corpus. Arion retains the remedy ofseeking relief in the Lewis and Clark County District Court through a petition for postconviction relief. See §§ 46-21-101, through 46-21-203, MCA. IT ISTHEREFORE ORDERED thatArion's Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and to Ryan Arion personally. 4-4-, DATED this e-e3C lay ofOctober, 2022.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

IN RE:

Case No.: 20-12702-PGH

DOLAN, JAMES ANTHONY

xxx-xx-1915 Chapter 13

Debtor. _____________________________/

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE BY ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR WITH LOCAL RULE

2083-1(B) CLAIMS REVIEW REQUIREMENT

The undersigned attorney for debtor certifies that a review of the claims register and

a l l c l a ims fi l e d i n t h e a b o v e r e f e r e n c e d c a s e h a s b e e n c omp l e t e d i n

a c c o r d a n c e wi t h Lo c a l Ru l e 2 0 8 3 - 1 (B) a n d t h a t :

1) No further action is necessary. 2) The following actions have been taken:

The debtor has filed an objection to the proof of claim filed by

.The debtor has filed a amended plan or modified plan to

provide for the proof of claim filed by

. Other: .

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this document has furnished to the

parties listed below by the method indicated on June 19, 2020. SEGAUL LAW FIRM

300 S Pine Island., Suite 304

Plantation, FL 33324

T: 954.424.3600 F: 954.374.7298

E: john@segaul.com

BY: /s/ John D. Segaul

John D. Segaul, Esq. FL Bar No. 907405

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 33 Filed 06/19/20 Page 1 of 2
Via ECF Email:

Robin R Weiner

ecf@ch13weiner.com;ecf2@ch13weiner.com

VIA US MAIL:

James Anthony Dolan

2813 Oakleigh Lane

Davie, FL 33328

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 33 Filed 06/19/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Multicriteria decisions and portfolio analysis: Land acquisition for biological and social objectives      

      July 18, 2021    

Resource allocation for land acquisition is a common multi-objective problem that involves complex trade-offs. The National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service currently uses the Targeted Resource Acquisition Comparison Tool (TRACT) to allocate funds from the Migratory Bird Conservation Fund (MBCF; established through the Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Act of 1934) for land acquisition based on cost-benefit analysis, regional priority rankings of candidate land parcels available for acquisition, and the overall biological contribution to duck population objectives. However, current policy encourages decision makers to consider societal and economic benefits of lands acquired, in addition to their biological benefits to waterfowl. These decisions about portfolio elements (i.e. individual land parcels) require an analysis of the difficult trade-offs among multiple objectives. In the last decade the application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods has been instrumental in aiding decision makers with complex multi-objective decisions. In this study, we present an alternative approach to developing land acquisition portfolios using MCDA and Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). We describe the development of a portfolio decision analysis tool using constrained optimization for land acquisition decisions by the NWRS. We outline the decision framework, describe development of the prototype tool in Microsoft Excel, and test the results of the tool using land parcels submitted as candidates for MBCF funding in 2019. Our results indicate that the constrained optimization outperformed the traditional TRACT method and ad hoc portfolios developed using current NWRS criteria.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### James E Lyons, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jelyons@usgs.gov

301-497-5567

## Related Content

#### James E Lyons, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jelyons@usgs.gov

301-497-5567

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 155 (Friday, August 9, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30809]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

8 CFR Parts 3 and 103

Executive Office for Immigration Review; List of Free Legal 
Services

Correction

    In proposed rule document 96-19732 beginning on page 40552 in the 
issue of Monday, August 5, 1996, make the following corrections:

Sec. 3.65  [Corrected]

    1. On page 40554, in the 1st column, in Sec. 3.65(a), in the 13th 
line, insert ``an answer'' after ``submit''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in Sec. 3.65(a), in the 
19th line, ``answers'' should read ``answer''.
    3. On the same page, in the same column, in Sec. 3.65(a), in the 
7th line from the bottom, insert ``or'' after ``organization's''.

PART 103--[CORRECTED]

    4. On the same page, in the second column, in the heading of part 
103, in the second line, ``SERVICES'' should read ``SERVICE''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8144** 

SAMUEL BURT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States D istrict Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Solomon Blatt, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 3:08

- cv - 03110

- SB )

Submitted : March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Samuel Burt, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precede nt in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Burt seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and order denying his motion to reconsider . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006) . A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the distr ict court is likewise debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);
Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

n ot aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30308]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, Issachar Gerlitz, Chief Executive Officer of Ness Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his
knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of the
Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 15, 2010
              
              
              /s/
      ISSACHAR
      GERLITZIssachar
      GerlitzChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 79 (Thursday, April 24, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[ND7-1-6882a; FRL-5618-8]


Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation 
Plan for North Dakota; Revisions to the Air Pollution Control Rules; 
Delegation of Authority for Colorado Standards of Performance for New 
Stationary Sources

Correction

    1. In the issue of Wednesday, February 12, 1997, on page 6619, in 
the third column, in the correction of rule document 96-25469, 
``Sec. 60.49 [Corrected]'' should read ``Sec. 60.4 [Corrected]'' and in 
the first line, ``Sec. 60.49'' should read ``Sec. 60.4(c)''.
H. R. 4957 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., in the 

District of Columbia as the ‘‘Ariel Rios Federal Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., 

in the District of Columbia shall be known and designated as 

the ‘‘Ariel Rios Federal Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ariel 

Rios Federal Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Case 20-20056-MAM Doc 21 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 20-20056-MAM Doc 21 Filed 01/13/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 20-20056-MAM Doc 21 Filed 01/13/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 20-20056-MAM Doc 21 Filed 01/13/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 20-20056-MAM Doc 21 Filed 01/13/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 20-20056-MAM Doc 21 Filed 01/13/21 Page 6 of 6