alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.45





SOUTHERN COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST





Amendment # 2 to the


Amended & Restated Salary Continuation Agreement of


Jeffrey T. Clark





This Amendment #2 (herein referred to as the “Amendment”) to the Amended & Restated Salary Continuation Agreement(herein referred to as the “Original Agreement”) that was entered into on 14th day of March, 2007, by and between Southern Community Bank andTrust, a North Carolina-chartered bank (herein referred to as the “Bank”), and Jeffrey T. Clark, its President
(herein referred to as the “Executive”).





WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Original Agreement provides that the Original Agreement may be modified by the mutual written contest of both the Bank and the Executive;





WHEREAS,the Bank and the Executive believe it to be in the best interest of each party to modify the benefit amount payable under the Original Agreement, and therefore do hereby mutually agree to “freeze” the Executive’s “Accrual Account” as of December 31, 2010 as defined in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement. The Amount of such frozen Accrual Account as of December 31, 2010 is $180,990;





WHEREAS,the amount of the Executive’s frozen “Accrued Account” as of December 31, 2010 shall be converted to a monthly Life Annuity in accordance with the Actuarial(Actuarially) Equivalentfactors as provided in Section 1.2(a) of the Original Agreement and such new amount shall be payable as of his Normal Retirement Date in accordance with Section 2.1(a).





WHEREAS,the Executive understands and agrees that no additional benefits shall accrue under the Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment #2 after December 31, 2010, until such time that the Executive and the Bank mutually agree in writing to a change in future benefit accruals.  The Executive understands that the Bank will review the Original Agreement and this Amendment #2 for reinstatement in 2012.





WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive intend that this Amendment # 2 shall supersede the amount of monthly (and annual) benefits previously provided in Section 2.1(a) of the Original Agreement.





NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Bank hereby agree as follows:





Section 2.1
Normal Retirement Benefit is amended by deleting the current subsection (a) and replacing it in its entirety with the following new subsection (a):





(a)
Amount of Normal Form of benefit. The annual Normal Retirement benefit under this Section 2.1 is $17,609, which shall be paid in monthly installments in the monthly amount of $1,467 for the Life of the Executive (Normal Form is a Life Annuity).





Page 1





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Bank have executed this Amendment # 2 to the Amended & Restated Salary Continuation Agreement as of this 16th day of December, 2010.




Executive:

Southern Community Bank and Trust:/s/ Jeffrey T. Clark

By:
/s/ F. Scott BauerJeffrey T. Clark


Title:
Chief Executive Officer





Page 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 66179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-41217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-AGL-36]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Coshocton, OH

Correction

    In rule document 97-32348 appearing on page 65014, in the issue of 
Wednesday, December 10, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 65014, in the third column, under the heading, AGL OH E5 
Coshocton, OH [Revised], in the sixth line, ``4.9'' should read ``4.0''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

54157

Vol. 62, No. 201

Friday, October 17, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Inventory Completion for

Native American Human Remains in

the Control of the National Park

Service, Haleakala National Park,

Makawao, HI

Correction

In notice document 97–27215,

appearing on page 53652, in the issue of

Wednesday, October 15, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 53652, in the third column,

in the tenth line, ‘‘[thirty days after

publication in the Federal Register]’’

should read ‘‘November 14, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Alfonso RAZZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2400

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 19, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CONSUELO VALDIVIEZ, DOC # H11693, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3963 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 19, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; Marcus J. Ezelle, Judge. Consuelo Valdiviez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   August 13, 2008
Rita Moraima ABBOUD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Ricardo VILLAVERDE and Ivon Villaverde, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied as moot.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Visualizing social-ecological intensities for management of recreation visitors in a multiuse system      

      December 6, 2021    

Accounting for the variation of visitor conflicts and ecological disturbance of outdoor recreation activities across space and time can cause difficulty for managers seeking to make decisions in social-ecological systems (SESs). We develop a method to quantify and visualize social and ecological intensities resulting from outdoor recreation. We demonstrate the utility of our method at Valentine National Wildlife Refuge, where we conducted onsite surveys for an entire year of recreationists participating in consumptive (i.e., hunting), intermediate-consumptive (i.e., fishing) and nonconsumptive (e.g., hiking) activities. We use survey results and combine them with expert consensus by engaging refuge managers and scientists (i.e., Delphi method) to chart patterns in social (e.g., visitor conflicts) and ecological (e.g., damages to natural resources) intensities across multiple spatial and temporal scales. We highlight unexpected patterns that are revealed by collectively considering multi-activity groups through space and time and combining different survey methods (onsite, Delphi method). Based on the consensus reached using the Delphi method, the consumptive group had the greatest potential for social conflicts and ecological disturbances. Social and ecological intensities (i.e., hotspots) of recreation varied across lake types and seasons, highlighting high-intensity areas and periods on the refuge. Accounting for diverse outdoor recreation activities and coinciding social and ecological intensities will allow managers of SESs the ability to concomitantly preserve ecological resources, prioritize conservation efforts, and minimize visitor conflicts. We demonstrate the utility and ease of use of this technique, which can be implemented by managers and scientists within their respective SES of interest.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kevin L. Pope, PhD

##### Deputy Chief

Cooperative Research Units

kpope@usgs.gov

571-548-2420

## Related Content

#### Kevin L. Pope, PhD

##### Deputy Chief

Cooperative Research Units

kpope@usgs.gov

571-548-2420

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Valentine National Wildlife Refuge
                  - Nebraska

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 214 (Monday, November 4, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 266


Standards for the Management of Specific Hazardous Wastes and 
Specific Types of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 260 to 299, 
revised as of July 1, 1996, Sec. 266.100 is corrected by adding 
paragraphs (c)(3)(i)(B)-(D) as follows:

Sec. 266.100  Applicability.

 * * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (B) The waste does not exhibit the Toxicity Characteristic of 
Sec. 261.24 of this chapter for an organic constituent; and
    (C) The waste is not a hazardous waste listed in subpart D of part 
261 of this chapter because it is listed for an organic constituent as 
identified in appendix VII of part 261 of this chapter; and
    (D) The owner or operator certifies in the one-time notice that 
hazardous waste is burned under the provisions of paragraph (c)(3) of 
this section and that sampling and analysis will be conducted or other 
information will be obtained as necessary to ensure continued 
compliance with these requirements. Sampling and analysis shall be 
conducted according to paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section and records 
to document compliance with paragraph (c)(3) of this section shall be 
kept for at least three years.
 * * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Chapter 11

CINEMEX HOLDINGS USA, INC. Case No. 20-14696-LMI

Reorganized Debtor (Formerly Jointly Administered Under

Lead Case: Cinemex USA Real Estate

Holdings, Inc., Case No. 20-14695-LMI)

_______________________________/

ORDER ADMITTING ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

This matter came before the court without a hearing on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac 

Vice [ECF No. 276]. The court having reviewed the motion and good cause appearing, it is

ORDERED that R. Campbell Hillyer, Esq. (“Visiting Attorney”) may appear before this 

court pro hac vice as counsel for MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC (“Client”) in this case and in each 

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 26, 2021.

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 283 Filed 10/27/21 Page 1 of 3
2

adversary proceeding in this case where Visiting Attorney appears on behalf of Client, subject

to the local rules of this court. Visiting Attorney shall include the certification required by 

Local Rule 9011-4(B)(2) in all papers filed with this court.

Visiting Attorney may apply to become a registered user of CM/ECF in this district with 

full filing privileges in this case and in any other case in which this court has entered an order 

admitting Visiting Attorney pro hac vice.

The following attorney (“Local Attorney”) is designated as the attorney qualified to 

practice in this court with whom the court and other counsel may readily communicate and upon 

whom papers may be served:

David L. Rosendorf

Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton, LLP

2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Tel: (305) 372-1800

Email: dlr@kttlaw.com

Local Attorney shall act as the local attorney as required by Local Rule 2090-1(C)(2) in

this case and in each adversary proceeding in this case in which the Visiting Attorney appears

on behalf of the Client(s). If Local Attorney declines to serve as the local attorney in any 

such adversary proceeding, a separate local attorney must file an additional Motion to Appear 

Pro Hac Vice, and absent such separate motion and an order of this court approving the same 

Local Attorney will continue to act as local attorney for the Client(s) in all such proceedings.

# # #

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 283 Filed 10/27/21 Page 2 of 3
3

SUBMITTED BY:

David L. Rosendorf

Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton, LLP

2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Tel: (305) 372-1800

Email: dlr@kttlaw.com

Counsel for MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

David L. Rosendorf, who shall serve copies on all interested parties and file a certificate of service.

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 283 Filed 10/27/21 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                            99.3

                       OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, LLC
                     SERVICER'S ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                  SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 2001-D

Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (May 1999 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated August 2001 among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood
Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and J P Morgan Chase & Co., the
undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period August 1, 2001 through September
30, 2001 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.




By: /s/ Derek M Surette
-----------------------

Name: Derek M Surette
---------------------

Title: Vice President /Controller
----------------------------------

Date: September 30, 2001
-------------------------
Valeria Andrea WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1004

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
I,  JON  A.  LATORELLA,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of LocatePlus Holdings
Corporation  for  the  period  ended  December  31,  2004.

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities  Exchange  Act  of 1934, as amended, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant  and  we  have:

     (A)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

     (B)   evaluated  the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as  of  a  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

     (C)   presented  in  this  annual  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as  of  the  Evaluation  Date;

5.   The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions):

     (A)   all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

     (B)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.


               /s/  Jon  R.  Latorella
               Jon  R.  Latorella
               President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

               October 24, 2005
J.L.S., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3920

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The use of support vectors from support vector machines for hydrometeorologic monitoring network analyses      

      January 14, 2020    

Hydrometeorologic monitoring networks are ubiquitous in contemporary earth-system science. Network stakeholders often inquire about the importance of sites and their locations when discussing funding and monitoring design. Support vector machines (SVMs) can be useful by their assigning each monitoring site as either a support or nonsupport vector. A potentiometric surface was created from synthetic data and 800 random observation locations (sites) as an analog to a groundwater-level network. Using generalized additive models for potentiometric surface prediction, simulations show that a subsample of support vectors from the 800 sites will out perform random samples of sample size equaling the support vector count. Support vector percentages from simulation quantify the recurrence that SVMs assign each site as a support vector, and these percentages in turn measure site importance. An example application of support vector percentages identifies important monitoring sites needed to regionalize the 0.1 annual exceedance probability peak streamflow. The results indicate that 152 of 283 streamgages with support vector percentages equalling 100 percent have not operated since about 2000 and generally have much smaller drainage areas than the greater streamgage network in Texas. The drainage area disparity is an indication of historical imbalance in peak streamflow data acquisition from various stream sizes in Texas.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William H. Asquith

##### RGEG Hydrologist

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

wasquith@usgs.gov

806-993-0232

## Related Content

#### William H. Asquith

##### RGEG Hydrologist

Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center

wasquith@usgs.gov

806-993-0232

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center - Nashville, TN Office

640 Grassmere Park DriveNashville, TN37211United States

GS-W-TNnsh Webmaster@usgs.gov

(615) 837-4700

(615) 837-4799 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - texas

View All **
Jeffrey FARINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1417

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re: Case No. 20-22282-EPK

Chapter 13

FRANK GABRIEL CAVALLINO, 

Debtor(s).

______________________________________________/

AIXO, LLC,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Adv. Proc. No. 21-01001-EPK

FRANK GABRIEL CAVALLINO,

Defendant(s).

______________________________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

This matter came before the Court for pretrial conference and for a hearing on 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial Period, or in the alternative, Extend Discovery Deadline 

(the “Motion”) [ECF 22] on September 8, 2021. For the reasons stated on the record, the 

Court ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows:

1. The motion is GRANTED to the extent herein.

Erik P. Kimball, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 8, 2021.

Case 21-01001-EPK Doc 24 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The pretrial conference in the above-captioned adversary proceeding is hereby 

CONTINUED to November 17, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. (the “Continued Pretrial Conference 

Date”). The hearing will take place only by video conference via Zoom for Government. DO 

NOT GO TO THE COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the 

courthouse. Although conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The 

formalities of the courtroom must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, 

exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity 

of the Court. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the 

following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsduGsrTouGn7Udkhqe_ZF90qPJ3uM95E. If 

a party is unable to register online, please call Dawn Leonard, Courtroom Deputy, at 561-

514-4143

3. This Court’s Order Setting Filing and Disclosure Requirements for Pretrial and 

Trial [ECF No. 19] (the “Deadline Order”) shall remain in full force and effect, and all 

deadlines set in the Deadline Order shall be calculated based on the Continued Pretrial 

Conference Date.

###

Copies furnished to:

Allison L. Friedman, Esq. 

Allison L. Friedman, Esq. is directed to serve a copy of this order on all appropriate parties 

and to file a certificate of service with the Court.

Case 21-01001-EPK Doc 24 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2