alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1524

DONALD E. CRUMBLE; WANDA E. CRUMBLE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

NEW DIRECTIONS MORTGAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

a Virginia Corporation,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

AMERICAN BUSINESS MORTGAGE SERVICES,

INCORPORATED, a New Jersey Corporation; BRIAN

COLES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-02-653)

Submitted: September 10, 2003 Decided: October 10, 2003

Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Kimberly A. Taylor, Dewey B. Morris, THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellants. Charles Arthur Gavin, BLACKBURN, CONTE,

SCHILLING & CLICK, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Donald and Wanda Crumble appeal the district court’s order

denying their motion to voluntarily dismiss their state law claim

and awarding summary judgment to Defendant New Directions Mortgage

Co., Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Crumble v. New Directions Mortgage Co., Inc., No. CA02-653 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10129]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 2869]]


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121

[Docket No. 27993; Amdt. No. 121-250, 135-57]
RIN 2120-AC79


Air Carrier and Commercial Operator Training Programs

Correction

    In rule document 95-30449 beginning on page 65940, in the issue of 
Wednesday, December 20, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 121.419  [Corrected]

    On page 65949, in the first column, Sec. 121.419 (a) (1) (viii) was 
designated incorrectly the first time, and the paragraph should read 
``(vii)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 MIAMI DIVISION

 CASE NO. 19-26046-BKC-AJC

 CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

GERARDO ARIAS,

Debtor.

 /

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE AND NOTICE OF

HEARING AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 9073-1(D)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above MOTION TO

REINSTATE CASE AND NOTICE OF HEARING thereon was served as follows via

electronic mail to Nancy Neidich, Trustee, at e2c801@ch13herkert.com and those set

forth in the NEF to be served electronically and was sent by U.S. Mail to all creditors.

this 24th day of July of 2020.

DATED: July 24, 2020

Law Offices of Michael J. Brooks, Michael A. Frank

& Rodolfo H. De La Guardia, Jr.

Attorneys for the Debtor(s)

Suite 620 • Regions Bank Building

10 Northwest LeJeune Road

Miami, FL 33126-5431

Telephone (305) 443-4217

Facsimile (305) 443-3219

Email - Pleadings@bkclawmiami.com

 /s/ 

Michael A. Frank

Florida Bar No. 339075

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 129 Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 1024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 95-1]


Margaret E. Sarver, M.D., Suspension of Registration; 
Reinstatement With Restrictions

Correction

    In notice document 96-28766 beginning on page 57896 in the issue of 
Friday, November 8, 1996 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 57899, in the second column, in the second paragraph, in 
the ninth line from the bottom, ``codeine produces'' should read 
``codeine products''.
    2. On the same page, in the third column, in the last paragraph, in 
the eleventh line from the bottom, insert ``glutethimide'' after 
``Respondent's''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-20465-BKC-RAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

ANGEL MAY PRENDERGAST

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE the above-referenced Debtor is delinquent in Confirmed Chapter 13 Plan 

Payments in the amount of $844.20.

The Debtor shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of this Notice to make all payments due under 

the Confirmed Plan/Modified Plan, INCLUDING ANY PAYMENTS THAT BECOME DUE WITHIN 

THE FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY PERIOD, in the form of a money order or cashier's check only. 

Payments must be sent to:

DEBTOR

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 2099

MEMPHIS, TN 38101-2099

If the Chapter 13 Trustee ("Trustee") does not receive all payments by July 10, 2022 to bring the 

Debtor totally current under the Confirmed Plan/Modified Plan, or if applicable, a Motion to Modify has 

not been timely filed and set within fifteen (15) days of this Notice pursuant to the Confirmation Order, 

the Trustee may file and serve a Report of Non-Compliance.

As a result of the Debtor failure to become current or timely file a Motion to Modify, the case shall 

be dismissed without further notice or hearing.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Delinquency was served, via U.S. 

first class mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed on the attached service list this 26th day of May 

2022.

/s/ Nancy K. Neidich

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

_____________________________________

Case 20-20465-RAM Doc 42 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY

CASE NO.: 20-20465-BKC-RAM

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

ANGEL MAY PRENDERGAST

3041 NW 185TH TERRACE

MIAMI GARDENS, FL 33056

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

MATT BAYARD, ESQUIRE

LEGAL SERVICES OF GREATER MIAM

4343 W FLAGLER ST

SUITE 100

MIAMI, FL 33134

Case 20-20465-RAM Doc 42 Filed 05/26/22 Page 2 of 2
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 20-19299-LMI Doc 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 7 of 7
Alan ARONSTEIN, Appellant, v. AO PRECISION MANUFACTURING, LLC, Galion, LLC., and High Standard Manufacturing Company, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASE NO.: 20-20759-BKC-LMI 

REYNEL MACIAS ULACIA CHAPTER 13

GRETET DOMINGUEZ PERALTA

 DEBTOR(S). /

MOTION TO ALLOW SALE OF HOMESTEAD PROPERTY

COME NOW, the Debtor(s), Reynel Macias Ulacia and Gretet Dominguez Peralta, by and 

through their undersigned counsel and file this Motion to Allow Sale of Homestead Property and 

as grounds therefore states:

1. Debtors filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 on September 30, 2020.

2. The Debtors currently have a proposed contract forsale of their homestead property located 

at 8755 SW 122nd St, Miami, FL 33176-5207. A copy of the Residential Contract for Sale 

is attached hereto as “Exhibit A”. 

3. Proceeds from the sale in the estimated amount of $750,000.00 are to be used for the 

purchase of a new homestead property. 

4. The title company handling the sale transactions is requiring court approval in order to 

close the transaction.

WHEREFORE, the Debtor(s), Reynel Macias Ulacia and Gretet Dominguez Peralta,

respectfully request this Court enter an Order Granting Debtor’s Motion to Allow Sale of 

Homestead Property.

I Hereby Certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in the 

Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1 

Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Patrick L Cordero, Esq. 

Attorney for Debtor 

7333 Coral Way 

Miami, Florida 33155

Tel: (305) 445-4855

 /s/ (FILED ECF) (The Debtor's Attorney)

Miriam V. Marenco, Esq., 

FL Bar No. 86115

Case 20-20759-LMI Doc 23 Filed 11/24/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Pliocene erosional pulse and glacier-landscape feedbacks in the western Alaska Range      

      August 6, 2018    

Pliocene–Pleistocene glaciation modified the topography and erosion of most middle- and high-latitude mountain belts, because the evolution of catchment topography controls long-term glacier mass balance and erosion. Hence, characterizing how erosion rates change during repeated glaciations can help test hypothesized glacier erosion-landscape feedbacks across a range of settings. To better understand how glaciations and landscapes coevolve on geologic timescales, I quantify erosion rates in the glaciated western Alaska Range with low-temperature thermochronometric data and modeling. Zircon (U–Th)/He and apatite fission track data suggest mountain-building was underway by the early Miocene. In contrast, lower-temperature apatite (U–Th)/He age-elevation and grain age-kinetic data indicate that erosion accelerated coincident with regional Pliocene glaciation ca. 4 Ma. Furthermore, erosion rates calculated within an eroding half-space indicate slow erosion at a rate ≤0.3 km/m.y. before 4.2 Ma, an initial pulse of rapid erosion at a rate of 1.0–1.6 km/m.y. during 4.2–2.9 Ma, and more moderate erosion at a rate of 0.4–0.7 km/m.y. since 2.9 Ma. The initial erosion pulse suggests a significant transient landscape adjustment to the introduction of efficient glacial erosion. The subsequent decrease in Pleistocene erosion rates is consistent with a negative feedback between continuing glaciation and glacier size/erosivity: If glacial erosion outpaces rock uplift, glacier erosion decreases over time as topography, mass balance, valley gradients, and ice flux are reduced. These findings imply that in areas of moderate rock uplift rates, the onset of local Plio–Pleistocene glaciation may have been punctuated by an initial pulse of rapid landscape change, after which change became more gradual.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

September 11, 2020

####                 Low-Temperature Thermochronometric Data from the Revelation Mountains, Western Alaska Range, 2013-2018              

Alaska Science Center

#### Richard O Lease, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

rlease@usgs.gov

907-786-7169

## Related Content

September 11, 2020

####                 Low-Temperature Thermochronometric Data from the Revelation Mountains, Western Alaska Range, 2013-2018              

Alaska Science Center

#### Richard O Lease, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

rlease@usgs.gov

907-786-7169

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - Geology
                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4906 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of employees 

of a land management agency in a time-limited appointment to compete 

for a permanent appointment at any Federal agency, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2016 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. MEADOWS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility 

of employees of a land management agency in a timelimited appointment to compete for a permanent appointment at any Federal agency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF EMPLOYEES IN A TIME-LIM4 ITED APPOINTMENT TO COMPETE FOR A 

5 PERMANENT APPOINTMENT AT ANY FED6 ERAL AGENCY. 

7 Section 9602 of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4906 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘any land 

2 management agency or any other agency (as defined 

3 in section 101 of title 31) under the internal merit 

4 promotion procedures of the applicable agency’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘such land management agency when such 

6 agency is accepting applications from individuals 

7 within the agency’s workforce under merit promotion 

8 procedures, or any agency, including a land manage9 ment agency, when the agency is accepting applica10 tions from individuals outside its own workforce 

11 under the merit promotion procedures of the appli12 cable agency’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (d) by inserting ‘‘of the agen14 cy from which the former employee was most re15 cently separated’’ after ‘‘deemed a time-limited em16 ployee’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATi’ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
750 

Sanote Ml2 328, Act8 af the 46th to&i2atGre, 

~~QUU’ sosslon, paasod by, both houses of tha Twms togislatwo,curriQuall3n3rg3llcy clrtuso,nDdBothhouesecP 

the M&latum, in pas5f.n~ the Act, obsamoil tim requirelZ3Dt8 in@%dbyAl%.3,S=r 30 , of our Constitution, regmllng the paoaaga of cme~gency xzmsuros. The Ad, the-as~~,~bocrma OffaetAYo as a laa on iiay 1, lDm, tho date 

uponwhieh ltaw al)pr#odby thoGovmoroP t&q Stat% of. 

Texarn* 
h&,b~I&l¶har qu~2%Mf%ltO Wtos suchrOfMc8r= 

fop th a lx a lme o f th a ta m Of the l o fMco * 
-pf;Lshed imruroct1y by bls reeignu- fian vith the iatention that his WIOeeesor shall cqt his ,vot.o for hlt3.e
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 63606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11201]



Federal Register/Vol. 62, No. 230/Monday, December 1, 1997/
Corrections

[[Page 63606]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Office of the Secretary

7 CFR Part 17


Regulations Governing the Financing of Commercial Sales of 
Agricultural Commodities

Correction

    In rule document 97-26578, beginning on page 52929, in the issue of 
Friday, October 10, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 17.4  [Corrected]

    On page 52934, in the third column, in Sec. 17.4(c)(7), in the 
fourth line, ``11'' should read ``1''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

GETU TADDESE,

Petitioner,

v.

No. 98-2043

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION

SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

(A72-382-738)

Submitted: March 30, 1999

Decided: April 21, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Onyebuchi N. Enechionyia, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Frank

W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, David M. McConnell, Assistant Director, James A. Hunolt, Office of Immigration Litigation,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Respondent.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Getu Taddese, a native Ethiopian, appeals from a Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") order that denied as untimely his motion to

reopen the decision of the Immigration Judge finding him deportable

and denying his application for asylum. We affirm.

We review the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen under an abuse

of discretion standard. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992);

Yanez-Popp v. INS, 998 F.2d 231, 234 (4th Cir. 1993). Denial of a

motion to reopen "must be reviewed with extreme deference," since

immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the applicable

regulations disfavor motions to reopen." M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304,

308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc). A motion to reopen deportation or

exclusion proceedings must generally be filed "not later than 90 days

after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered

in the proceedings sought to be reopened or on or before September

30, 1996, whichever is later." 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(c)(2)(1998). Here, the

BIA's final decision was entered July 1, 1996;* Taddese's motion to

reopen was filed June 23, 1997, well beyond the 90-day limitation.

Accordingly, we find that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in

denying Taddese's motion to reopen and affirm the BIA's order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

_________________________________________________________________

*The BIA's order and a transcript of the hearing were served on Taddese's counsel, in compliance with the applicable regulation. See 8

C.F.R. § 292.5(a) (1998).

 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

61426

Vol. 62, No. 221

Monday, November 17, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97-6-010]

Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of

Compliance Filing

Correction

In notice document 97–29546

appearing on page 60498, in the issue of

Monday, November 10, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 60498, in the second column,

the Docket No. should be as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-402]

Certain Integrated Circuits and

Products Containing Same; Notice of

Investigation

Correction

In notice document 97–29269

beginning on page 59880, in the issue of

Wednesday, November 5, 1997, make

the following correction:

On page 59881, in the first column, in

the fourth line ‘‘September 29, 1997’’

should read ‘‘October 29, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97–AWP–23]

Amendment of Class E Airspace;

Flagstaff, AZ

Correction

In rule document 97–28103,

beginning on page 55157, in the issue of

Thursday, October 23, 1997, make the

following correction:

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

On page 55158, in the third column,

under AWP AZ E5 Flagstaff, AZ

[Revised], in the 11th line from the

bottom of the paragraph, ‘‘111°2533W’’

should read ‘‘111°3533W’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70508]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK WADE M c CUNE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 20

- 15839

D.C. No. 4:19

- cv

- 00525

- CKJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Mark Wade McCune appeals pro se from the district court ’ s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims . We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dou gherty v. City of Covina , 654

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 15839

F.3d 892, 897 (9 th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed McCune’s action because McCune

failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal

,

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to

state a plausible claim for relief); Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish , 382 F.3d 969,

973 (9 th Cir. 2004) ( “[T] he court is not required to accept legal conclusions cast in

the form of factual alle gations if those conclusions cannot reasonably be drawn

from the facts alleged.”) ; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) (claims for fraud must be

pleaded with particularity)

.

We reject as without merit McCune’s contention that the district court was

required to hold an evidentiary hearing prior to dismissing McCune’s action

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first t ime on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

McCune’s motions requesting oral argument (Docket Entry Nos. 35 and 36)

are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.2

 

	
 

 

Certificate
   Number

[·]
    	
 
    	
 

ACQUITY GROUP LIMITED

 

INCORPORATED IN THE CAYMAN ISLANDS UNDER THE COMPANIES LAW

(AS AMENDED OR REVISED FROM TIME TO TIME)

 

THE AUTHORISED CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY IS USD50,000 DIVIDED INTO 500,000,000 ORDINARY SHARES OF A   NOMINAL OR PAR VALUE OF USD0.0001 EACH
    	
 
    	
 

 

Ordinary Shares

[·]
    


 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT [shareholder] of [address] is the registered holder of [number of ordinary shares] Ordinary Shares of par value USD0.0001 each subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company, and transferable only on the book of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney in accordance with the Memorandum and the Articles of Association of the Company and upon surrender of this certificate to the Company.

 

EXECUTED on behalf of the Company this          day of                  20         .

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
Director/Secretary