alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ___________ 

No. 21-50802 

 ___________ 

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Alberto Ricardo Montemayor,

Defendant—Appellant. 

 ______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:14-CR-598-2 

 ______________________________ 

Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

 The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Ricardo Montemayor 

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montemayor has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as 

well as Montemayor’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

June 8, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-50802 Document: 00516349347 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2022
No. 20-61172 

2 

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-50802 Document: 00516349347 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2022
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Toward a US framework for continuity of satellite observations of Earth's climate and for supporting societal resilience      

      February 12, 2024    

There is growing urgency for improved public and commercial services to support a resilient, secure, and thriving United States (US) in the face of mounting decision-support needs for environmental stewardship and hazard response, as well as for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Sustained space-based Earth observations are critical infrastructure to support the delivery of science and decision-support information with local, national, and global utility. This is reflected in part through the United States' sustained support of a suite of weather and land-imaging satellites. However, outside of these two areas, the US lacks an overarching, systematic plan or framework to identify, prioritize, fund, and implement sustained space-based Earth observations to meet the Nation's full range of needs for science, government policy, and societal support. To aid and accelerate the discussion on our nation's needs, challenges and opportunities associated with sustained critical space-based Earth observations, the Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) sponsored a multi-week think-tank study to offer ways forward. Based on this study, the KISS study team suggests the establishment of a robust coordination framework to help address US needs for sustained Earth observations. This coordination framework could account for: (a) approaches to identify and prioritize satellite observations needed to meet US needs for science and services, (b) the rapidly evolving landscape of space-based Earth viewing architecture options and technology improvements with increasing opportunities and lower cost access to space, and (c) the technical and programmatic underpinnings required for proper and comprehensive data stewardship to support a wide range of research and public services.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Paul C. Selmants

##### Research Ecologist

Western Geographic Science Center

pselmants@usgs.gov

650-439-2273

## Related Content

#### Paul C. Selmants

##### Research Ecologist

Western Geographic Science Center

pselmants@usgs.gov

650-439-2273

### Contact

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 63576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21211]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION

5 CFR Part 1900


Repeal of Employee Responsibilities and Conduct Regulations for 
Appalachian Regional Commission Federal Employees (Federal Staff)

Correction

    In rule document 95-29884 appearing on page 62702 in the issue of 
Thursday, December 7, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 1900.100  [Corrected]

    On page 62702, in the third column, the heading for Sec. 1900.100 
should read as set forth below.


Sec. 1900.100  Cross-reference to employee ethical conduct standards 
and financial disclosure regulations.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Land use and climate affect Black Tern, Northern Harrier, and Marsh Wren abundance in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States      

      April 21, 2014    

Bird populations are influenced by many environmental factors at both large and small scales. Our study evaluated the influences of regional climate and land-use variables on the Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus), Black Tern (Childonias niger), and Marsh Wren (Cistothorus palustris) in the prairie potholes of the upper Midwest of the United States. These species were chosen because their diverse habitat preference represent the spectrum of habitat conditions present in the Prairie Potholes, ranging from open prairies to dense cattail marshes. We evaluated land-use covariates at three logarithmic spatial scales (1,000 ha, 10,000 ha, and 100,000 ha) and constructed models a priori using information from published habitat associations and climatic influences. The strongest influences on the abundance of each of the three species were the percentage of wetland area across all three spatial scales and precipitation in the year preceding that when bird surveys were conducted. Even among scales ranging over three orders of magnitude the influence of spatial scale was small, as models with the same variables expressed at different scales were often in the best model subset. Examination of the effects of large-scale environmental variables on wetland birds elucidated relationships overlooked in many smaller-scale studies, such as the influences of climate and habitat variables at landscape scales. Given the spatial variation in the abundance of our focal species within the prairie potholes, our model predictions are especially useful for targeting locations, such as northeastern South Dakota and central North Dakota, where management and conservation efforts would be optimally beneficial. This modeling approach can also be applied to other species and geographic areas to focus landscape conservation efforts and subsequent small-scale studies, especially in constrained economic climates.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Wayne E Thogmartin, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

wthogmartin@usgs.gov

608-781-6309

## Related Content

#### Wayne E Thogmartin, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

wthogmartin@usgs.gov

608-781-6309

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center          

2630 Fanta Reed RoadLa Crosse, WI54603United States

(608) 783-6451

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Iowa;Minnesota;Montana;Nebraska;North Dakota;South Dakota
                  - iowa
                  - Minnesota
                  - Montana
                  - Nebraska
                  - North Dakota
                  - South Dakota

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Widespread exposures of extensive clean shallow ice in the mid-latitudes of Mars      

      January 26, 2021    

Although ice in the Martian midlatitudes is typically covered by a layer of dust or regolith, it is exposed in some locations by fresh impact craters or in erosional scarps. In both cases, the exposed ice is massive or excess ice with a low lithic content. We find that erosional scarps occur between 50° and 61° north and south latitude and that they are concentrated in and near Milankovič crater in the northern hemisphere and southeast of the Hellas basin in the southern hemisphere. These may represent locations of particularly thick or clean bodies of ice. Pits created by retreat of the scarps represent sublimation-thermokarst landforms that evolve in a manner distinct from other ice-loss landforms on Mars. New impact craters reveal that clean subsurface ice is widespread at middle- and high-latitudes in both hemispheres at depths less than 1 m. Both the depth to ice and the ice content appear to exhibit significant variability over tens to hundreds of meters. The lowest-latitude exposed ice is near 39°N and is at the edge of a region where impact exposures between 40° and 50°N are common, consistent with other indications of a high ice content. This lowest-latitude ice may be currently unstable and subliming. Impact craters on lineated valley fill excavate ice blocks that may represent the top of debris-covered glacial ice. Together, these landforms indicate widespread, clean subsurface ice at middle-latitudes on Mars. The distribution and properties of this ice could provide information about past climate conditions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

May 21, 2021

####                 Locations and Properties of Ice-Exposing Scarps and New Impact Craters in the Mid-Latitudes of Mars              

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Colin Dundas, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

cdundas@usgs.gov

928-556-7143

#### Kaj Williams, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

kewilliams@usgs.gov

## Related Content

May 21, 2021

####                 Locations and Properties of Ice-Exposing Scarps and New Impact Craters in the Mid-Latitudes of Mars              

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Colin Dundas, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

cdundas@usgs.gov

928-556-7143

#### Kaj Williams, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

kewilliams@usgs.gov

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
U

. S

. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENE RGY CONSERVATION STANDARD

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS FOR DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20 585

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Room 1E

- 245

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy

conservation standard preliminary analysis. DOE will also explain its plans for the

remaining analyses for the rulemaking. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on the

rulemaking , including planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.

Agenda

9:00

- 9:05 am Welcome

Jim Raba

9:05

- 9: 20 am Introductions, Agenda Review, and Opening Statements

Jim Raba and Doug Brookman , Facilitator

9: 20

- 9: 25 am Regulatory History

Brian Coffey

9: 25

- 9 : 3 0 am Rulemaking Overview and Scope of Coverage

Brian Coffey

9:30

- 10:00 a m Test Procedure

Brian Coffey

10:00

- 10:15 am Break

10:15

- 11:00 a m Market and Technology Assessment and Screening

Analysis

Brian Coffey

11:00

- 12:00 pm Engineering Analysis

Matt Hartley

12:00

- 1:00 pm Break for Lunch

1:00

- 1:15 pm Markups for Product Price Determination

Greg Rosenquist1:15

- 1:45 pm Energy Use and End

- Use Load Characterization

Katie Coughlin

1:45

- 2:15 pm Life

- Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis

Katie Coughlin

2:15

- 2:45 pm Shipments and National Impacts Analysis

Greg Rosenquist

2:45

- 3:00 pm Break

3:00

- 3:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Matt Hartley

3:15

- 3:30 pm NOPR Analyses

Greg Rosenquist

3:30

- 4:00 pm Closing Remarks

Jim Raba
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

65739

Vol. 62, No. 240

Monday, December 15, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. OA96-206-002]

The Empire District Electric Company;

Notice of Filing

Correction

In notice document 97–32128

appearing on page 64818, in the issue of

Tuesday, December 9, 1997, the Docket

Number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 175

[CGD 85–080]

RIN 2115–AC 22

Small Passenger Vessel Inspection

and Certification; Correction

Correction

In rule document 97–31895,

beginning on page 64303, in the issue of

Friday, December 5, 1997, make the

following correction:

§ 175.400 [Corrected]

On page 64306, in the second column,

in § 175.400, in the definition of Wood

vessel, in the sixth line, ‘‘area’’ should

read ‘‘are’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Dynamics, Inc., as
amended (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Charles E. Phillips, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Charles E. Phillips
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles E. Phillips
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer

                                                     August 29, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
INDIAN CREEK VILLAGE, etc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. INDIAN CREEK COUNTRY CLUB, INC., etc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

CASE NO.: 3D14-2235

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register: June 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 114)]
[Notices]               
[Page 33788-33789]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15jn10-56]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0077]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete a 
systems of record notice from its existing inventory of record systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
July 15, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://[[Page 33789]]www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the Privacy Act Officer, Office of Freedom of 
Information, Washington Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-1155.
    The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete one 
system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject 
to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed 
deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act 
of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of 
a new or altered system report.

    Dated: June 9, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
    DGC 15.

System name:
    Reports of Defense Related-Employment (February 22, 1993; 58 FR 
10227).

Reason:
    Based on review of DGC 15, Reports of Defense Related-Employment, 
it has been concluded that this system can be covered by OGE/Govt 1, 
Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Reports and 
Other Name-Retrieved Ethics Program Records.

[FR Doc. 2010-14248 Filed 6-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4887 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4887

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, as the ``Richard Allen Cable 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD ALLEN CABLE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 23323 Shelby Road in Shelby, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Richard Allen Cable Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard 
Allen Cable Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3619 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to provide for outreach, and 

coordination of services, to veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 

Mr. MANCHIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to provide 

for outreach, and coordination of services, to veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamlining Services 

5 for Older Veterans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OUTREACH AND COORDINATION OF SERVICES TO 

7 VETERANS. 

8 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 102 of the Older Ameri9 cans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3002) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (24)— 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3619 IS

1 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

2 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

3 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

4 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) status as a veteran.’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(55) The term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

9 the term in section 101 of title 38, United States 

10 Code.’’. 

11 (b) AREA PLAN.—Section 306(a) of the Older Ameri12 cans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3026(a)) is amended— 

13 (1) in paragraph (16), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

14 end; 

15 (2) in paragraph (17), by striking the period 

16 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(18) include information describing— 

19 ‘‘(A) how the area agency on aging will en20 gage in outreach to veterans who are eligible for 

21 services under this Act; and 

22 ‘‘(B) effective and efficient procedures for 

23 the coordination of services provided under this 

24 Act with services provided to veterans by the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3619 IS

1 Department of Veterans Affairs and other pro2 viders.’’. 

3 (c) STATE PLAN.—Section 307(a) of the Older Amer4 icans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3027(a)) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(31) The plan shall include information de7 scribing— 

8 ‘‘(A) how the State agency will engage in 

9 outreach to veterans who are eligible for serv10 ices under this Act; and 

11 ‘‘(B) effective and efficient procedures for 

12 the coordination of services provided under this 

13 Act with services provided to veterans by the 

14 Department of Veterans Affairs and other pro15 viders.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS