alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         500,307
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,498,647
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               850,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         21,481
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           21,481
<LOANS>                                        5,667,089
<ALLOWANCE>                                    348,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,354,645
<DEPOSITS>                                     8,763,036
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            70,937
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       760
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,471,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 10,354,645
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                405,280
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,587
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               136,867
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               543,734
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             174,122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             174,122
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          369,612
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                158,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                61,581
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     61,581
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   61,581
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 5.59
<LOANS-NON>                                    226,283
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                456,430
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               348,305
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              348,305
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           17,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        331,305



</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Volcanic eruptions; energy and size      

      January 1, 1991    

The Earth is a dynamic planet. Many different processes are continuously developing, creating a delicate balance between the energy stored and generated in its interior and the heat lost into space. The heat in continuously transferred through complex self-regulating convection mechanisms on a planetary scale. The distribution of terrestrial heat flow reveals some of the fine structure of the energy transport mechanisms in the outer layers of the Earth. Of these mechanisms in the outer layers of the Earth. Of these mechanisms, volcanism is indeed the most remarkable, for it allows energy to be transported in rapid bursts to the surface. In order to maintain the subtle balance of the terrestrial heat machine, one may expect that some law or principle restricts the ways in which these volcanic bursts affect the overall energy transfer of the Earth. For instance, we know that the geothermal flux of the planet amounts to 1028 erg/year. On the other hand, a single large event like the Lava Creek Tuff eruption that formed Yellowstone caldera over half a million years ago may release the same amount of energy in a very small area, over a short period of time. 

## Citation Information
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  J EROME A NTHONY A LFORD ,

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 01-35141

v. D.C. No. CV-99-05586-RJB J OI H ANER , a Washington State Western District



#  Patrol Officer; J OHN D OE H ANER , of Washington, her husband; G ERALD D EVENPECK , Tacoma Sgt., Washington State Patrol; J ANE D OE D EVENPECK , his wife, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

On Remand From the United States Supreme Court

Filed August 9, 2005

Before: James R. Browning, Betty B. Fletcher, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case has returned to us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Devenpeck v. Alford , 125 S. Ct. 588 (2004), reversing Alford v. Haner , 333 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2003). In turn, we now remand the case to the district court.

As the Supreme Court has pointed out, we did not, in our original disposition, decide whether the police had probablecause to arrest Alford for obstructing a law enforcement officer or for impersonating a law enforcement officer. See 125 S. Ct. at 595. Our review of the record below reveals that the jury did not have occasion to pass on this question either. In fact, the jury received no instruction on the elements of any

10231offense for which Alford might have been arrested other than a violation of Washington’s Privacy Act.

We therefore REMAND the case to the district court for retrial on the alternate theories indicated by the Supreme Court. 10232 A LFORD v. H ANERPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
Exhibit
3.3





CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT


OF


CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION


OF


KIWA
BIO-TECH PRODUCTS GROUP CORPORATION








Kiwa
Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation (the “Company”), a corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, does hereby certify:





FIRST:
That pursuant to the unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors of the
Company, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation to increase the number of
shares of common stock authorized for issuance from 200,000,000 shares to
400,000,000 shares, declaring said amendment to be advisable and directing that
the amendment proposed be considered at the next annual meeting of the
stockholders of said corporation. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:





RESOLVED,
that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing
the first paragraph of the Article thereof numbered “4” so that, as amended,
said paragraph of such Article shall be read in its entirety as
follows:





“The
Corporation is authorized to issue two (2) classes of capital stock to be
designated, respectively, “Common
Stock” and “Preferred
Stock.” The total number of shares of capital stock that this Corporation
is authorized to issue is Four Hundred Twenty Million (420,000,000) shares. Four
Hundred Million (400,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per
share, and Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par
value $0.001 per share.”




SECOND:
That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, an annual
meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon
notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required
by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.





THIRD:
That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.





FOURTH:
That this Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation shall be
effective immediately upon filing with the Delaware Secretary of
State.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by
Wei Li, its President and Chief Executive Officer, this 9th day of
January, 2009.






KIWA
      BIO-TECH PRODUCTS GROUP
CORPORATION






By:
            /s/ Wei
      Li
              Wei
      Li, President and Chief Executive
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 131 (Wednesday, July 9, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 36872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20709]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-942-5700-00]


Filing of Plats of Survey; California

Correction

    In notice document 97-17048 appearing on page 35222 in the issue of 
Monday, June 30, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 35222, in the second column, under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT:, in the fourth line, ``2138'' should read ``2135''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1628

LAURENT KONGADEMBOU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-216-252)

Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 10, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, Mary Jane Candaux, Senior Litigation Counsel, Anh-Thu P.

Mai, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Kongadembou does not challenge the denial of withholding

under the Convention Against Torture.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Laurent Kongadembou, a native and citizen of the Central

African Republic, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s

order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s findings that

Kongadembou’s asylum application was untimely. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(a)(3) (2000); Zaidi v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 678, 680-81 (7th

Cir. 2004) (collecting cases). Given this jurisdictional bar, we

cannot review the underlying merits of Kongadembou’s asylum claim.

While we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of

Kongadembou’s asylum claim, we retain jurisdiction to consider the

denial of his request for withholding of removal.* See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.4(a) (2004). “To qualify for withholding of removal, a

petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of

persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership

in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS,

296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 467

U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). A trier of fact who rejects an applicant’s

testimony on credibility grounds must offer specific, cogent

reasons for doing so. Figeroa v. INS, 886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir.
- 3 -

1989). This Court accords broad, though not unlimited, deference

to credibility findings supported by substantial evidence.

Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). We find the

Board’s conclusion that Kongadembou was not credible to be

supported by the evidence. Accordingly, Kongadembou’s challenge to

the denial of his application for withholding from removal must

fail. 

Accordingly, we deny Kongadembou’s petition for review.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Gaylen                Brotherson                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                         |   |   |        |
| Gaylen                  BrothersonChairman                  of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 21,                  2005 |   |   |   |
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Using dissolved organic matter fluorescence to predict total mercury and methylmercury in forested headwater streams, Sleepers River, Vermont USA      

      April 5, 2022    

Aqueous transport of mercury (Hg) across the landscape is closely linked to dissolved organic matter (DOM). Both quantity and quality of DOM affect Hg mobility, as well as the formation and transport of toxic methylmercury (MeHg), but only a limited number of field studies have investigated Hg and MeHg with respect to specific DOM components. We investigated these interactions at the 41-ha forested W-9 catchment at Sleepers River, Vermont, which has a long history of mercury and other biogeochemical research. We examined spatial and temporal patterns of filtered Hg fractions and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, DOM quality, and major solutes at 12 stream sites within W-9 and the downstream W-3 gage (837 ha) over five sampling campaigns including a large (79 mm) fall storm, spring snowmelt, and three seasonally contrasting base flow periods. Filtered total Hg (THg), MeHg, and DOC concentrations increased in order base flow < snowmelt < fall storm, except that MeHg remained at baseflow levels during snowmelt. Ranges of median concentrations across sites for the five campaigns were THg, <0.2–4.1 ng L−1; MeHg, <0.03–0.45 ng L−1; and DOC, 0.8–14.0 mg L−1. Humic-like DOM fluorescence components, as determined by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC), dominated the fluorescence across sites and sampling campaigns. THg correlated strongly (r > 0.94) with these humic components, but even more strongly with bulk DOC and absorbance at 254 nm (UV254; r > 0.96), and less strongly with protein-like DOM (0.7 < r < 0.9). MeHg correlated in the same order but less strongly with humic- (0.8 < r < 0.9) and protein-like (0.6 < r < 0.8) DOM. MeHg increased in summer, potentially in response to enhanced microbial production in warmer periods. MeHg formation may have been linked to protein-like DOM, but its transport was linked to humic-like DOM.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Sleepers River Research Watershed
                  - Vermont

View All **
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 19 (Thursday, January 29, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-10129]

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 19 / day, January 29, 1998 / 
Corrections

[[Page 4529]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface and Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 901

[SPATS No. AL-067-FOR]

Alabama Regulatory Program

Correction

    In rule document 97-33335 beginning on page 66819, in the issue of 
Monday, December 22, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 66819, in the table, in the first column, in the third 
line, ``Hydrologic Ground Water Monitoring'' should read ``Hydrologic 
Balance: Surface and Ground Water Monitoring''.
    2. On page 66819, in the second column, in the fifth line from the 
bottom, after ``Federal Regulations'', start a new paragraph with the 
heading ``Rules 880-X-10C-.40 and 880-X-10D-.36 Coal Mine Waste: Refuse 
Piles''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Using high-frequency sampling to detect effects of atmospheric pollutants on stream chemistry      

      January 1, 2009    

View Document

We combined information from long-term (weekly over many years) and short-term (high-frequency during rainfall and snowmelt events) stream water sampling efforts to understand how atmospheric deposition affects stream chemistry. Water samples were collected at the Sleepers River Research Watershed, VT, a temperate upland forest site that receives elevated atmospheric deposition of pollutants such as nitrogen (N) and mercury (Hg). Our use of high-frequency sampling documents responses of nutrients and mercury in streamflow to atmospheric deposition inputs to the watershed.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−17395−LMI

Chapter: 13

In re:

Damaris Travieso

2255 W 69th Street #2

Hialeah FL 33016−6814

SSN: XXX−XX−9574

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Laurel M Isicoff on 10/06/2020

at 09:00AM

by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions LLC

To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00 p.m.,

one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be made

by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

**EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY** Until further notice or unless directed otherwise, the court will ONLY hold

hearings by TELEPHONE. Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services

FREE of charge. All attorneys shall advise their clients NOT to appear at the courthouse.

to consider the following:

[26] Objection to Claim of Internal Revenue Service [# 20−1], Filed by Debtor Damaris Travieso

(Sanchez, Robert)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and shall

file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party who fails to

properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities. Electronic

devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras), iPads, tablets,

pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are not permitted in

the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for cameras not

integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar identification card,

attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses subpoenaed to appear in a

specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited electronic device into a federal

courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge and verified by the United States

Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 9/22/2020

By: Robert Sanchez

Case 20-17395-LMI Doc 27 Filed 09/22/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Substantial declines in salinity observed across the Upper Colorado River Basin during the 20th century, 1929 to 2019      

      April 19, 2021    

Salinity in the Colorado River Basin causes an estimated $300 to $400 million per year in economic damages in the U.S. To inform and improve salinity‐control efforts, this study quantifies long‐term trends in salinity (dissolved solids) across the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), including time periods prior to the construction of large dams and preceding the implementation of salinity‐control projects. Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season was used with datasets of dissolved‐solids and specific‐conductance measurements, collected as early as 1929, to evaluate long‐term trends in dissolved‐solids loads and concentrations in streams from 1929 to 2019 (n=14). Results indicate that large, widespread, and sustained downward trends in dissolved‐solids concentrations and loads occurred over the last 50 to 90 years. For 12 of the 14 stream sites with significant downward change, median declines of ‐38% (range of ‐14 to ‐57%) and ‐40% (range of ‐9 to ‐65%) were observed for flow‐normalized concentration and load, respectively. Steepest rates of decline occurred from 1980 to 2000, coincident with the initiation of salinity‐control efforts in the 1980s. However, there was a consistent slowing or reversing of downward trends after 2000 even though salinity‐control efforts continued. Significant decreases in salinity occurred as early as the 1940s at some streams, indicating that, in addition to salinity‐control projects, changes in land cover, land use, and/or climate substantially affect salinity transport in the UCRB. Observed dissolved‐solids trends are likely the result of changes to watershed‐related processes, not due to changes in the streamflow regime.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Christine Rumsey

##### Hydrologist

Utah Water Science Center

crumsey@usgs.gov

801-908-5022

#### Olivia Miller

##### Hydrologist

Utah Water Science Center

omiller@usgs.gov

801-908-5007

#### Robert M Hirsch

##### Research Hydrologist Emeritus

Water Resources Mission Area

rhirsch@usgs.gov

703-648-5888

## Related Content

#### Christine Rumsey

##### Hydrologist

Utah Water Science Center

crumsey@usgs.gov

801-908-5022

#### Olivia Miller

##### Hydrologist

Utah Water Science Center

omiller@usgs.gov

801-908-5007

#### Robert M Hirsch

##### Research Hydrologist Emeritus

Water Resources Mission Area

rhirsch@usgs.gov

703-648-5888

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Upper Colorado River Basin
                  - Arizona
                  -  Colorado
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **