alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20055

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PAULETTE DAVIS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-240

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paulette Davis pleaded guilty to making false entries and reports of

moneys or securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073. She was sentenced to two

years of probation. As a special condition of her supervision while on probation,

Davis was ordered to “participate in a mental health program as deemed

necessary and approved by the probation officer.” Davis appeals, arguing that

the districtjudge unlawfully and unconstitutionally delegated his statutory and

Article III authority to determine sentencing conditions to a non-judicial officer.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 12, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20055

2

Because Davis did not object at sentencing, this court reviews for plain

error only. To show plain error, Davis must show an error that is clear or

obvious and that affects her substantial rights. United States v. Baker, 538 F.3d

324, 332 (5th Cir. 2008). If she makes such a showing, this court has the

discretion to correct the error but only if it seriously affects the fairness,

integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.

Davis cites primarily United States v. Albro, 32 F.3d 173 (5th Cir. 1994),

to support her position that the district judge plainly erred by delegating his

authority to determine special conditions of release to a probation officer. In

that case, Albro was convicted of bank fraud and ordered to pay restitution.

Although the district judge himself determined the amount to be paid, he

delegated the “manner of payment” to a probation officer. We agreed with Albro

that “‘the amounts to be paid and the manner of payment should be recited in

the [sentencing] order, rather than delegating these details to the probation

officer.’” Id. at 174 (citations omitted). We found plain error and reversed.

In United States v. Warden, this court held that it was not plain error to

allow a probation officer to determine a defendant’s ability to pay for drug

treatment; Albro concerned “restitution payments,” this court wrote, not the

costs of drug treatment. 291 F.3d 363, 365-66 (5th Cir. 2002). In United States

v. Vega, 332 F.3d 849, 852 n.3 (5th Cir. 2003), this court determined that it was

not plain error to allow a probation officer to determine the length of a

defendant’s drug treatment.

In light of our opinions in Warden and Vega, there could be no plain error

here because our precedents do not plainly require the result Davis urges.

Accordingly, Davis’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

18650

Vol. 61, No. 82

Friday, April 26, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Estimates of the Voting Age

Population for 1995

Correction

In notice document 96–8025,

beginning on page 15460, in the issue of

Monday, April 8, 1996, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 15460, in the second

column, ‘‘Iowa 2,177’’ should read

‘‘Iowa 2,117.’’

2. On the same page, in the third

column, ‘‘Washington 1,013’’ should

read ‘‘Washington 4,013.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-930-1430-01; N-60630]

Notice of Realty Action: NonCompetitive Sale of Public Lands

Correction

In notice document 96–6612

appearing on page 11427 in the issue of

Wednesday, March 20, 1996, make the

following correction:

On the same page, in the 3rd. column,

in the land description for Mount Diablo

Meridian, Nevada, in the 3rd line,

‘‘S1⁄2NW1⁄4S1⁄4’’ should read

‘‘S1⁄2NW1⁄4SW1⁄4’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

20 CFR Part 656

RIN 1205-A152

Labor Certification Process for the

Permanent Employment of Aliens;

Researchers Employed by Colleges

and Universities

Correction

In proposed rule document 96–9911

beginning on page 17610 in the issue of

Monday, April 22, 1996, make the

following correction:

§ 656.40 [Corrected]

On page 17614, in the second column,

in § 656.40(c), in the fourth line, after

‘‘universities’’ insert ‘‘means

‘researchers employed by colleges and

universities in the area of intended

employment.’.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quartz helix magnetic susceptibility balance using the Curie-Cheneveau principle      

      January 1, 1958    

A quartz spring balance is described which can be used to measure the magnetic susceptibility of submilligram amounts of sample. The magnetic field is supplied by a moving permanent magnet, and the susceptibility is determined by the deflection of the spring observed in a measuring microscope. The apparatus is calibrated by a comparison standard (platinum) and results are shown for platinum, nickel aluminate, lead, manganese, and sucrose. A precision of better than 2% can be obtained on submilligram amounts of paramagnetic substances having a magnetic susceptibility of from 1 to 50×10−6 emu/g. On weakly paramagnetic or diamagnetic substances comparable precision can be obtained on less than 10 mg amounts of sample.

## Citation Information
Case 20-14248-RAM Doc 25 Filed 06/10/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-14248-RAM Doc 25 Filed 06/10/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-14248-RAM Doc 25 Filed 06/10/20 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7913
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLARENCE GOODWIN PERKINS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-93-194, CA-95-1124) Submitted: August 29, 1997 Decided: December 3, 1997 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Goodwin Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Perkins , Nos. CR-93-194; CA-95-1124 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 9, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We deny Appellant's motion for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Lauren Ann KIRIMBAI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2342

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 9, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geologic map of the Little Piute Mountains, San Bernardino County, California      

      November 1, 1995    

View Document

Introduction 

The Little Piute Mountains in the eastern Mojave Desert expose a series of folds and thrust faults involving metamorphosed Paleozoic strata (Miller and others, 1982; Stone and others, 1983). Detailed mapping of these structures was undertaken to help elucidate regional Mesozoic structural evolution. Earlier geologic maps were prepared by Cooksley (1960a,b,c,d, generalized by Bishop, 1964) and Stone and others (1983). 

Deformed and metamorphosed Paleozoic and Triassic rocks form a stratalsuccession that was originally deposited in shallow seas on the North American craton. Based on lithologic sequence the units are correlated with unmetamorphosed equivalents 200 km to the northeast in the Grand Canyon, Arizona, and 35-50 km to the west in the Marble, Ship, and Providence Mountains, California (Stone and others, 1983). The Paleozoic sequence rests nonconformably on a heterogeneous basement of polydeformed Early Proterozoic gneiss (Miller and others, 1982; Wooden and Miller, 1990). Triassic and older rocks were deformed, metamorphosed to staurolite or andalusite grade, and intruded concordantly at their base by Late Cretaceous granodiorite (Miller and others, 1982).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Keith A Howard

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

khoward@usgs.gov

650-439-2843

## Related Content

#### Keith A Howard

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

khoward@usgs.gov

650-439-2843

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### Keith A Howard

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

khoward@usgs.gov

650-439-2843

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Little Piute Mountains
                  - california

View All **
Case 20-01333-LMI    Doc 5    Filed 08/27/20    Page 1 of 2

Case 20-01333-LMI    Doc 5    Filed 08/27/20    Page 2 of 2
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EWRX
INTERNET SYSTEMS, INC. (the Company ) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report
), I, Jessica Q. Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the disclosure of
deficiencies in the Companys disclosure controls and procedures set forth in
Item 9A of the Report:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

April 1, 2011

/s/Jessica Q. Wang

Jessica Q. WangChief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer

---
Form of Amend to Severance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.14 
 AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment (this
“Amendment”) to that certain Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated                     ,
20        , by and between SemGroup Corporation, a Delaware corporation (with any successor, the “Company”), and
                    (the “Participant”) is adopted and approved by the Company to be effective as of November 18, 2011.

 R E C I T A L: 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement to extend the expiration date for an additional two year period; 

NOW THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Agreement as follows: 

1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement unless
otherwise defined herein. 
 2. Authority to Amend. This Amendment is adopted and approved by the Company with the
consent of the Participant pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Agreement. 
 3. Amendment to Section 1.6 of
Agreement. Section 1.6 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 1.6
“Agreement Term” means the period commencing on the Agreement Date and ending on June 1, 2014. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, with respect to a Post-Change Period, the Agreement Term shall end at the end of
the Severance Period (as defined in Section 2.1(c)) if applicable, or if there is no such Severance Period, the earliest of the following: (a) the second anniversary of the Change Date, or (b) the Termination Date; provided that:
(i) the obligations, if any, of SemGroup to make payments under this Agreement due to a Separation from Service which occurred during the Agreement Term shall continue beyond the Agreement Term until all such obligations are fully satisfied,
and (ii) the obligations of Executive under this Agreement shall continue beyond the Agreement Term until all such obligations are fully satisfied. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall automatically terminate
upon the occurrence of a Disqualifying Disaggregation pursuant to Section 1.21. 
 4. Continuation of Agreement.
Except as specifically stated herein, this Amendment does not change the terms and conditions of the Agreement which remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and a duly authorized representative of SemGroup Corporation
have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	[EXECUTIVE]
	
	  

	
	SEMGROUP CORPORATION, acting on behalf of itself and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates
	 By:
	 	  

		 	Norman J. Szydlowski
		 	President and CEO



  
 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

RON VIGDOR

XXX-XX-4069

_____________________________/

OBJECTION TO CLAIM AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

OF COURT GENERATED HEARING

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITORS:

THIS IS AN OBJECTION TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks to either disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority status of the 

claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify which claim is 

objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the Trustee objects to the 

following claim filed in this case:

DEBTOR

Claim#: 11.2

Claimant: Toyota Lease Trust

Reason: The Proof of Claim was filed after the Claims Bar Date.

Disposition: Sustain Objection and disallow claim.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this 

Court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of this Objection to Claim and 

Certificate of Service of Court Generated Notice of Hearing was served, via U.S. first class mail, certified 

mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed below this 8th day of April, 2021.

/s/ Robin R. Weiner

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

TELEPHONE: 954-382-2001

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 861154

_____________________________________

Page 1 of 2

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 59 Filed 04/08/21 Page 1 of 2
OBJECTION TO CLAIM

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

RON VIGDOR

5204 LANE PARKE COURT

MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL 35223

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

CHRISTIAN J. OLSON, ESQUIRE

C/O NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

8551 SUNRISE BLVD, SUITE 208

PLANTATION, FL 33322

CREDITOR

Toyota Lease Trust

c/o Becket and Lee LLP

POB 3001

Malvern, PA 19355

ADDITIONAL CREDITORS

CT CORPORATION SYSTEM

R.A. FOR TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

1200 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD

PLANTATION, FL 33324

MICHAEL GROFF, PRESIDENT

19001 S WESTERN AVENUE, EF-12

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT

TORRANCE, CA 90501

Page 2 of 2

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 59 Filed 04/08/21 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

M. GARZA ENTERPRISES, INC. and

EVERETT HOLDINGS, LLC

,

Appellant s

,

v.

JULIA PEREZ

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00354

- CV

Appeal from

131st Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2022CI00753 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction . We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction . We

further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal and that this decision be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26 TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J.
Joseph KOSTY & Sonia Kosty, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PINGORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D15-4493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 02, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 101 (Tuesday, May 27, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[File No. 952-3331]


America Online, Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment

Correction

    In notice document 97-12581 beginning on page 26510 in the issue of 
Wednesday, May 14, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 26510, in the first column, the second line in the DATES 
section, ``[60 days after Federal Register publication date]'' should 
read ``July 14, 1997.''
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
Order entered August 28, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00685-CR

ANTHONY DEWAYNE JAMERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-57615-V

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 23, 2019 motion for extension of time to file his 

pro se response. We GRANT appellant’s pro se motion and ORDER his pro se response due on 

or before October 25, 2019.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
Case 20-14647-LMI Doc 2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-14647-LMI Doc 2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

++++++ Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Transaction Statement on
       Schedule 13E-3 filed August 22, 2003.

         # Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement filed in
           response to Item 14(a)(3) of the instructions to Form 10-K.

     Exhibits to be filed herewith:

<Table>
<S>    <C>
10.27  Independent Contractor Agreement, dated as of October 1,
       2002, between Edison Schools Inc. and Empowerment Ministries
14     Code of Ethics
23.1   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
31.1   Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
       302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2   Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
       302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1   Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
       906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2   Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
       906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
</Table>

                                       105
## HYSPLIT - Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model

The HYSPLIT model can be run interactively on the R EADY web site or installed on a PC (Mac) and run us ing a graphical user interface (GUI). Got a question about HYSPLIT? Ask your question thr ough the HYSPLIT Forum

. 

### HYSPLIT-WEB (Internet-based) Run HYSPLIT Trajectory Model Run HYSPLIT Dispersion Model (includes volcanic ash) HYSPLIT for Volcanic Ash Spain HYSPLIT HYSPLIT for NWS Forecast Offices (NOAA employees only - you will leave the ARL web site) 

### PC Windows-based HYSPLIT Download Public (unregistered) Version Download Registered Version ( registration required ) Graphical Utilities Meteorological Data Conversion Utilities 

### Apple-based HYSPLIT Download Registered Version 

### HYSPLIT-compatible Meteorological Data NOAA ARL Archived Data NOAA NCEP Forecast Data Operational NOMADS Server NOAA ARL Forecast Data FTP Server Arctic Region Supercomputing Center (ARSC) HRRR For ecast Data Model Details University of Alaska Fairbanks GDAS Archive FTP server 

### Email Version Email Trajectories 

### Modules Chemical Conversion 

### User Contributions TrajStat a GIS Trajectory Analysis Tool MeteoInfo a GIS Meteorology-Dispersion Model Analys is Tool The Openair Project 

### Documentation HYSPLIT Model Overview Example HYSPLIT Products HYSPLIT User's Guide (PDF, 2.1 MB) or (zipped HTML file ~1.9MB) Description of the HYSPLIT_4 Modeling System (PDF, 182 KB) Research Papers Referencing HYSPLIT Publications 

## Air Resources Laboratory - HYSPLIT - Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangia... http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSP LIT.php

1 of 2 9/16/2015 10:35 AMModified: June 11, 2015

US Dept. of Commerce | NOAA | NOAA Research | ARL Privacy | Disclaimer | Information Quality Accessibility | webmaster Web Pages Referencing HYSPLIT Verification Results using the DATEM archive 

### On-Line Training/Presentations PC HYSPLIT Tutorial Configuring HYSPLIT for Radionuclide Applications PowerPoint with notes (~9.3 Mb; Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer ) PDF with no animation or notes (~3.8 Mb) HYSPLIT Applications for Emergency Decision Support(COMET) Dispersion Basics (COMET) HYSPLIT Training Workshops HYSPLIT Forum 

## Air Resources Laboratory - HYSPLIT - Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangia... http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSP LIT.php

2 of 2 9/16/2015 10:35 AM