alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 85 (Friday, May 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10502]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 24159]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-387-001]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 97-10808 beginning on page 22924 in the issue of 
Monday, April 28, 1997, the docket number should read as set forth 
above.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 96 Filed 11/01/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 96 Filed 11/01/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 96 Filed 11/01/21 Page 3 of 3
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4832 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain health 

arrangements from the excise tax on employer-sponsored health coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2016 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself and Mr. BERA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

certain health arrangements from the excise tax on employer-sponsored health coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Savings Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN HEALTH ARRANGEMENTS 

7 FROM EMPLOYER-SPONSORED EXCISE TAX. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

9 4980I(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

10 amended by striking the period at the end of clause (iii) 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4832 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘, or’’ and by adding at the end the following 

2 new clause: 

3 ‘‘(iv) any amounts contributed to an 

4 Archer MSA under section 106(b), a 

5 health savings account under section 

6 106(d), or a health flexible spending ar7 rangement— 

8 ‘‘(I) by an employee, or 

9 ‘‘(II) by an employer through sal10 ary reduction contributions.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

12 (1) Section 4980I(d)(2)(B) of the Internal Rev13 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘shall be 

14 equal to the sum of’’ and all that follows and insert15 ing ‘‘shall be equal to the amount determined under 

16 subparagraph (A) with respect to any reimburse17 ment under the arrangement in excess of any em18 ployer contributions under any salary reduction elec19 tion under the arrangement.’’. 

20 (2) Section 4980I(d)(2)(C) of such Code is 

21 amended by inserting ‘‘(determined without regard 

22 to any employer contributions under any salary re23 duction election under the arrangement)’’ before the 

24 period at the end. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4832 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10130]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 4576]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 951227306-5306-01; I.D. 092596B]


Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; 
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Nontrawl Sablefish Mop-Up Fishery

Correction

    Document 96-25369, beginning on page 51670 in the issue of October 
3, 1996, was inadvertently published in the Proposed Rules section. It 
should have appeared in the Rules and Regulations section.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Soil-atmospheric exchange of CO2, CH4, and N2O in three subtropical forest ecosystems in southern China      

      January 1, 2006    

The magnitude, temporal, and spatial patterns of soil-atmospheric greenhouse gas (hereafter referred to as GHG) exchanges in forests near the Tropic of Cancer are still highly uncertain. To contribute towards an improvement of actual estimates, soil-atmospheric CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes were measured in three successional subtropical forests at the Dinghushan Nature Reserve (hereafter referred to as DNR) in southern China. Soils in DNR forests behaved as N2O sources and CH4 sinks. Annual mean CO2, N2O, and CH4 fluxes (mean ?? SD) were 7.7 ?? 4.6MgCO2-Cha-1 yr-1, 3.2 ?? 1.2 kg N2ONha-1 yr-1, and 3.4 ?? 0.9 kgCH4-Cha-1 yr-1, respectively. The climate was warm and wet from April through September 2003 (the hot-humid season) and became cool and dry from October 2003 through March 2004 (the cool-dry season). The seasonality of soil CO2 emission coincided with the seasonal climate pattern, with high CO2 emission rates in the hot-humid season and low rates in the cool-dry season. In contrast, seasonal patterns of CH4 and N2O fluxes were not clear, although higher CH4 uptake rates were often observed in the cool-dry season and higher N2O emission rates were often observed in the hot-humid season. GHG fluxes measured at these three sites showed a clear increasing trend with the progressive succession. If this trend is representative at the regional scale, CO2 and N2O emissions and CH4 uptake in southern China may increase in the future in light of the projected change in forest age structure. Removal of surface litter reduced soil CO2 effluxes by 17-44% in the three forests but had no significant effect on CH4 absorption and N2O emission rates. This suggests that microbial CH4 uptake and N2O production was mainly related to the mineral soil rather than in the surface litter layer. ?? 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10909

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Cuedell Javon Henry, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-211-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Defendant-Appellant Cuedell Javon Henry appeals his conviction and 

sentence for possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 922(j), 924(a)(2), and 2. He contends that his prior conviction for Texas 

aggravated robbery is not a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a).

Henry acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by our precedent but 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10909 Document: 00516864144 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2023
No. 22-10909

2

seeks to preserve it for further review. The government filed an opposed 

motion for summary affirmance or, in the alternative, an unopposed motion 

for an extension of time to file its brief.

As Henry concedes, his position is foreclosed. See United States v. 

Santiesteban-Hernandez, 469 F.3d 376, 380–81 (5th Cir. 2006), abrogated on 

other grounds by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2013) (en 

banc). We have reaffirmed that holding and concluded that Texas robbery 

qualifies as a crime of violence under § 4B1.2(a)(2). See United States v. 

Adair, 16 F.4th 469, 470–71 (5th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 1215 

(2022). The government is correct that summary affirmance is appropriate. 

See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

The government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, 

the government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED AS MOOT, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-10909 Document: 00516864144 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2023
# L_2004244EN.01002601.xml

| 16.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1304/2004

of 15 July 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 34rd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 34rd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 47,100 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p. 7. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2126/2003 (OJ L 319, 4.12.2003, p. 4).

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0
- 0221 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR. ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 20, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court August 13 2021

08/13/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0221
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifying soil surface change in degraded drylands: shrub encroachment and effects of fire and vegetation removal in a desert grassland      

      June 20, 2012    

Woody plant encroachment, a worldwide phenomenon, is a major driver of land degradation in desert grasslands. Woody plant encroachment by shrub functional types ultimately leads to the formation of a patchy landscape with fertile shrub patches interspaced with nutrient-depleted bare soil patches. This is considered to be an irreversible process of land and soil degradation. Recent studies have indicated that in the early stages of shrub encroachment, when there is sufficient herbaceous connectivity, fires (prescribed or natural) might provide some reversibility to the shrub encroachment process by negatively affecting shrub demography and homogenizing soil resources across patches within weeks to months after burning. A comprehensive understanding of longer term changes in microtopography and spatial patterning of soil properties following fire in shrub-encroached grasslands is desirable. Here, we investigate the changes in microtopography with LiDAR (light detection and ranging), vegetation recovery, and spatial pattering of soil properties in replicated burned, clipped, and control areas in a shrub-grass transition zone in the northern Chihuahuan Desert four years after prescribed fire or clipping. Results indicate a greater homogeneity in soil, microtopography, and vegetation patterning on burned relative to clipped and control treatments. Findings provide further evidence that disturbance by prescribed fire may allow for reversal of the shrub encroachment process, if the event occurs in the early stages of the vegetation shift. Improved understanding of longer-term effects of fire and associated changes in soil patterning can inform the use and role of fire in the context of changing disturbance regimes and climate.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Contact

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - chihuahuan desert

View All **
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSALReducing Carbon Pollution FromExisting Power PlantsDeborah Jordan, DirectorAir Division, US EPA, Region 9CCEEB Summer Issues SeminarJuly 15, 2014Building Block Strategy EPA Used toCalculate the State GoalMaximum Flexibility:Examples of StateCompliance Measures1. Make fossil fuel-firedpower plants moreefficientEfficiency Improvements Efficiency improvements atplantsCo-firing or switching to naturalgasCoal retirementsRetrofit CCS2. Use lower-emitting powersources moreDispatch changes toexisting natural gascombined cycle (CC)Dispatch changes to existingnatural gas CC3. Build more zero/lowemitting energy sourcesRenewable EnergyCertain NuclearNew NGCCRenewablesNuclear (new and up-rates)New coal with CCS4. Use electricity moreefficientlyDemand-side energyefficiency programsDemand-side energy efficiencyprogramsTransmission efficiencyimprovementsEnergy storage2Flexibilities Available to States•Timing–Compliance begins 2020; final compliance 2030–Two or three years to develop plans•Form of goal: States can use either arate-basedormass-basedgoal.•Although goals were set based on fourcomponents, States can use any mix of measuresto meet the goal.•Single-state ormulti-stateplans3Next Steps•Proposed rule and supporting documentsavailable online at:http://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan•4 public hearings the week of July 28thin Denver,Atlanta, Pittsburgh and Washington, D.C.•120-day public comment period closesOctober16, 2014.•Final Action June 20154Closing Thoughts•Proposal uses consistent methodology toestablish CO2 goals across the U.S.•Goals are tailored to each state’s fuel mix andopportunities for renewable energy andenergy efficiency investments.•States can develop multi-state plans – there isadditional time to do so•California has flexibility to pursue path thatmakes sense for California.5Benefits and Costs•Nationwide, by 2030, this rule would help reduce CO2emissions fromthe power sector by approximately 30% from 2005 levels.•Also by 2030, reduce by over 25% pollutants that contribute to ozone andparticulate matter•These reductions will lead to public health and climate benefits worthan estimated $55 billion to $93 billion in 2030.•Proposal will avoid an estimated 2,700 to 6,600 premature deaths and140,000 to 150,000 asthma attacks in 2030.•Health and climate benefits far outweigh the estimated annual costs ofmeeting the standards.•Estimated at $7.3 billion to $8.8 billion in 2030.•Proposal protects children and other vulnerable Americans from thehealth threats posed by a range of pollutants.•Move us toward a cleaner, more stable environment for futuregenerations.•Ensures an ongoing supply of the reliable, affordable power needed foreconomic growth.6
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


(18
      U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
      officer of Document Capture Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      ("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
      belief, that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Form
      10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
                August 13, 2008/s/ David P. ClarkDavid P. Clark,Chief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
      Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
      any
      filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.




-
          33-
The CJS SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC, d/b/a The HCI Group, Appellant, v. Maxine SIMMONS, an individual, and Global Information Technology Resources, Inc., a California corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018

Kenneth A. Tomchin and Brett P. Abner of Tomchin & Odom, P.A., Jacksonville; Joshua A. Cossey, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

T. A. Delegal, III, and James C. Poindexter of Delegal Law Offices, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee Maxine Simmons.

No appearance for Appellee Global Information Technology Resources, Inc.

Per Curiam.

The Court has determined that as to Appellee Maxine Simmons, the order on appeal is not "one that disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims." Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). Accordingly, the motion, filed on May 10, 2018, is granted and the appeal is dismissed with respect to the order granting in part and denying in part Simmons' motion for summary judgment.

We note that the February 27, 2018, Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Global Information Technology Resources, Inc., is a partial final judgment disposing of the entire case as to Appellee Global Information Technology Resources, Inc., and is subject to immediate appellate review. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). The appeal shall proceed from that order.

Rowe, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
TED K. BROWN

,

Petitioner,

v.

VALERIE BROWN

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CAS E NO. 1D 16

- 2048

Opinion filed July 11, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Ted K. Brown, pro se

, Petitioner.

Robin E. Lanigan, Jacksonville, and Jeanine B. Sasser, Jacksonville , for

Respondent (no appearances)

.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF

                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Roger S. Siboni, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code, that:

     1.   The annual report on Form 10-K to which this statement is an exhibit
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of E.piphany, Inc.


                                                  /s/ Roger S. Siboni
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Roger S. Siboni
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                CERTIFICATION OF

                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kevin J. Yeaman, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code, that:

     1.   The annual report on Form 10-K to which this statement is an exhibit
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of E.piphany, Inc.


                                                  /s/ Kevin J. Yeaman
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Kevin J. Yeaman
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Michael ORTIZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REGIONS BANK, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.