Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 4, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-01031-CR No. 05-14-01032-CR No. 05-14-01033-CR

DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Crimin al District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-52047-L, F14-52048-L, F14-52049-L



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill

Daniel DeAnthony Felder, Jr. waived a jury and pleaded guilty to three offenses of

aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 29.03(a)(2) (West

2011). The trial court assessed punishment at fi fteen years’ imprisonment in each case.

On appeal, appellant’s attorn ey filed a brief in which sh e concludes the appeals are

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a profes sional evaluation of the record showing why, in

effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12‐ 2 ‐ (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel de livered a copy of the brief to appellant. We

advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he di d not file a pro se response. See

Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying dutie s of appellate

courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the reco rd and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explain ing appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeals.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 141031F.P05

/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE‐ 3 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant

No. 05-14-01031-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-52047-L). Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Lang and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered November 4, 2015‐ 4 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant

No. 05-14-01032-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-52048-L). Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Lang and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered November 4, 2015.‐ 5 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant

No. 05-14-01033-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-52049-L). Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Lang and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered November 4, 2015.