alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Potential effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) on coastal wetlands      

      June 6, 2006    

Carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere has steadily increased from 280 parts per million (ppm) in preindustrial times to 381 ppm today and is predicted by some models to double within the next century. Some of the important pathways whereby changes in atmospheric CO2 may impact coastal wetlands include changes in temperature, rainfall, and hurricane intensity (fig. 1). Increases in CO2 can contribute to global warming, which may (1) accelerate sea-level rise through melting of polar ice fields and steric expansion of oceans, (2) alter rainfall patterns and salinity regimes, and (3) change the intensity and frequency of tropical storms and hurricanes. Sea-level rise combined with changes in storm activity may affect erosion and sedimentation rates and patterns in coastal wetlands and maintenance of soil elevations.

Feedback loops between plant growth and hydroedaphic conditions also contribute to maintenance of marsh elevations through accumulation of organic matter. Although increasing CO2 concentration may contribute to global warming and climate changes, it may also have a direct impact on plant growth and development by stimulating photosynthesis or improving water use efficiency. Scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey are examining responses of wetland plants to elevated CO2 concentration and other factors. This research will lead to a better understanding of future changes in marsh species composition, successional rates and patterns, ecological functioning, and vulnerability to sea-level rise and other global change factors.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Karen McKee, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

mckeek@usgs.gov

337-593-5800

## Related Content

#### Karen McKee, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

mckeek@usgs.gov

337-593-5800

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Science and values in river restoration in the grand canyon: There is no restoration or rehabilitation strategy that will improve the status of every riverine resource      

      January 1, 1998    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
# L_2004374EN.01004801.xml

| 22.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 374/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 374/48

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2208/2004

of 21 December 2004

concerning tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender for the export to certain third countries of wholly milled and medium and long grain A rice issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 14(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders submitted from 13 to 16 December 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the export refund on wholly milled rand, medium and long grain A rice to certain third European countries issued in Regulation (EC) No 2031/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 18).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 179 (Friday, September 13, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-1-88-000]


Black Marlin Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 96-22871 appearing on page 47508 in the issue of 
Monday, September 9, 1996, the docket number was omitted and should 
read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
uNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX, 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, Ca. 94105-3901

f\/\1 fI, 

## a.t IV L.it t 1

Mr. Ronald Greenberg Manager, Plant Safety and Environment Manville Building Insulation P.O. Box 904 Willows, CA 95988 Dear Mr. Greenberg: IN REPLY REFER TO: A-5-1 NSR 4-4-4 SAC 77-07

,"

In accordance with provisions ofthe Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), the Environmental ProtectionAgency has reviewed the application for-a-permit modification submitted by Schuller International, Inc. . A request for public commentregarding EPA's proposed action on the above application has beenpublished. After consideration ofthe expressed views of all interested persons (including State and local agencies), and pertinentFederal statutes and regulations, the EPA hereby amends the October 

### 3, 1978 Approval to Construct originally issued to Manville Sales Corp. for the modernization oftheir existing fiber glass 

### manufacturing facility located in Willows, California. This amendmentrevisesSpecial Condition 

### IX.B. as requested and allows the construction and operation ofa third module on the 132HERM line. This action does not constitute a significantchange from the proposed action set forth and offered for public comment. This Approval to Construct/Modify shall take effect immediately. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contactBob Baker ofour New Source Section at (415) 744-1258. Sincerely, 

# IlL-I! 

# /11 ,;1. r"I

# ~~~/ David P. Howekamp Director Air and Toxics Division Enclosure cc: CARB Glenn County APCD

Printedon RecycledPaperAmendments to the October 3, 1978 Approval to Construct (NSR 4-4-4, SAC 77-07) The October 3, 1978 Approval to Construct issued to Manville Sales Corp., now Schuller International, Inc., for a fiber glass manufacturing facility is hereby amended as follows: Special Condition IX.B. is amended to read as follows: B. Emission Limits for Particulate Matter On or after the date of startup of the equipment for which the performance tests required to be conducted by Special Condition A above is initiated, Schuller International, Inc. shall not discharge or cause the discharge into the atmosphere from the subject equipment any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of the amounts indicated below for the following sources: LINE 132 ffiERM) Source No. 1 2-7 8 9 10-12

13 14 15 16-17 18, 38-40 LINE 133 (HERM) Source No.

19-26

27 28-30

. 31

32 33-50

36

.37 Operation Melter Collection Curing Cooling Mixed Batch Day Bin Storage Bin Blender Receiver Wool Blowing Cullet

Operation Silos Melter Collection Curing Cooling Mixed Batch Day Bin Storage Bin Blender/Receiver Maximum lbs/hr 1.25 7.00 (per unit) 5.00 2.50 0.20 (per unit) 

### 020 0.20 0.20 0.10' (per unit) 

### . 0.01 (per unit)

Maximum lbs/hr.'

* Only one silo is permitted to operate at anyone time. 

### All other permit conditions are unchanged and remain in effect. ... .'!'
# C_2004175EN.01000701.xml

| 7.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3435 — LYONDELL / MILLENNIUM)

(2004/C 175/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3435. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3435. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
1DQFL0DUWLQH] 5$0

Case 20-12993-RAM Doc 27 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 63 (Monday, April 1, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 14375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20401]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 92

[Public Notice 2265]


Bureau of Consular Affairs; Notarial and Related Services

Correction

    In rule document 95-24588 beginning on page 51719 in the issue of 
Tuesday, October 3, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 92.58  [Corrected]

    On page 51723, in the first column, ``Sec. 92.59(s)'' should read 
``Sec. 92.58(s)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Instrument of Amendment for Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc



 Exhibit 10.1 
 INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT FOR 
 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.

 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RESTORATION PLAN 
 THIS INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT (this “Instrument”) is made and entered into as of the 23rd day of January, 2012, by PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC., a North Carolina corporation (the
“Company”). 
 Statement of Purpose 

The Company maintains the Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. Defined Contribution Restoration Plan (the “Plan”). The
Company desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of retirement. In Section 6.1 of the Plan the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in part at any time and has further directed that the Benefit Plan Committee
(the “Committee”) shall have the authority to adopt any non-substantive amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the
Company, acting through the Committee, does hereby declare that the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
 1. Effective as
January 1, 2010, Section 2.1(b)(19) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

““Retirement” shall mean a Participant’s Separation from Service on or after such Participant
is eligible for early or normal retirement under the defined benefit pension plan sponsored by the Company or would have been so eligible if the Participant were eligible to participate in such plan.” 

2. Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written. 

 

			
	PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin M. O’Hara

		 	    Kevin M. O’Hara
		 	    Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer


 “Company”
Farron Alexander TAYLOR v. STATE

CR-15-1430

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 7, 2017

Reh. denied.
Johnny G. BOROMEI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**JEREMY TRAVIS WOODARD,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 157 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**KEITH REED,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 158 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**JOSHUA N. CAMBRIC,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 159 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM**[157 WAL 2016, 158 WAL 2016 and 159 WAL 2016] - 2**

AND NOW **, this 13th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**and the Petition for Remand are** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 24.3



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Daniel A, Hamann, or Deryl F. Hamann, or either of them, attorney for me and
in my name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, to be filed or as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 with respect to the registration of the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust I and the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust II, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in
the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27thday of January 2006,



/S/    ROBERT W.
MURRAYRobert W. Murray
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.16
 PHARMANET DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 1999 STOCK PLAN
   Provided, however




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



provided,
however Provided,
however
    3




---



##### 



provided,
however
 4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



provided, however
     provided
  7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



i.e
      9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



Provided however
   12




---



##### 



Stock Withholding
 Stock Delivery
 Withholding Taxes
   13




---



##### 



14
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

43581

Vol. 62, No. 157

Thursday, August 14, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration

29 CFR Part 1910

RIN 1218-AA95

Methylene Chloride; Approval of

Information Collection Requirements;

Extension of Start-up Dates

Correction

In rule document 97–20890 beginning

on page 42666 in the issue of Friday,

August 8, 1997, make the following

correction:

§ 1910.8 [Corrected]

On page 42666, in the third column,

in amendatory instruction 2., in the

second line, ‘‘1910.52***1218-0179’’

should read ‘‘1910.1052......1218-0179’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 228, 229, 230, 232, 239,

240, and 249

[Release Nos. 33-7431 and 34-38850; S7-

15-96]

RIN 3235-AG80

Phase Two Recommendations of Task

Force on Disclosure Simplification

Correction

In rule document 97–19444 beginning

on page 39755 in the issue of Thursday,

July 24, 1997, make the following

corrections:

1. On page 39755, in the third

column, in the sixth line, ‘‘13a1’’ should

read ‘‘13a-1’’.

PART 239 [CORRECTED]

2. On page 39764, in the second

column, in the fifth line, insert ‘‘14.’’ in

front of ‘‘By’’.

3. On page 39764, in the third

column:

a. In the seventh line, insert ‘‘15.’’

in front of ‘‘By’’.

b. In the 12th line, insert ‘‘16.’’ in

front of ‘‘By’’.

4. On page 39766, in the second

column:

a. In the 11th line, ‘‘public’’ should

read ‘‘public———————’’.

b. In the 12th line, remove the ‘‘Q’’

and the line.

5. On page 39766, in the second

column, under GENERAL

INSTRUCTIONS:

a. In the seventh line, ‘‘following:

The’’ should read ‘‘following: the’’.

b. In the tenth line from the bottom,

‘‘(i) Such’’ should read ‘‘(i) such’’.

§ 240.12d1-2 [Corrected]

6. On page 39766, in § 240.12d1-2, in

the third column, insert five asterisks

under the undesignated center heading

‘‘Certification by Exchanges and

Effectiveness of Registration’’.

PART 249 [CORRECTED]

7. On page 39770, in the second

column, in the second paragraph, in the

first line, insert ‘‘41.’’ in front of ‘‘By’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Willie ROGERS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Paul L. Berns, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Allos Therapeutics, Inc., and David C. Clark, the Vice President, Finance of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Quarterly Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                     The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: May 10, 2011

 
|   | /s/   Paul L. Berns                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul   L. Berns                                |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer        |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer)                |
|   |                                           |
|   |                                           |
|   | /s/   David C. Clark                           |
|   | David   C. Clark                               |
|   | Vice   President, Finance and Treasurer        |
|   | (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.  This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Jerome Alexander ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Thomas Jeffery ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
        32
 CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
        OF 2002
 The
        undersigned
        hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
        Quarterly Report of Nathaniel Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB
        for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
        of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
        and
        that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
 Dated:
        May 15,
        2007
  By:
            /s/
                *Brad
                E. Bailey*Brad
                E.
                BaileyChief
                Executive Officer
                (Principal
                  financial officer)


---