alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23



 






EXHIBIT
10.23




BOWATER INCORPORATED REPAYMENT AGREEMENT




     I, David J. Paterson, an employee of BOWATER INCORPORATED (the “Company”), have
received an amount equal to $380,970 (the “Bonus”) from Bowater Incorporated (the
Company) in connection with services rendered in anticipation of the merger between
Bowater Incorporated and Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (the “Merger”).



     I hereby agree that if my employment with the Company or an affiliate of the
Company terminates within thirty-six months of the effective date of the Merger as the
result of either my voluntary termination or my involuntary termination for cause, I
will be required to reimburse the Company for a prorated portion of the after-tax value
of my Bonus. In order to determine the after-tax value, the effective tax rate shall
be assumed to be 43%. The proration of the amount of Bonus owed shall be computed as
follows:


(1 — (days from effective date of the Merger to date of termination divided by 1,095)).




     The Company shall, to the extent permitted by applicable laws, reduce any
compensation otherwise due to me upon my termination of employment, including but not
limited to regular wages, severance pay and bonuses, by the amount of the Bonus that I
am required to reimburse the Company.



     The amount of the Bonus owed by me shall bear interest at the maximum rate of
interest permitted by law from the date of the termination of my employment until the
date of repayment. In addition, I agree to pay all costs of enforcement and collection,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees.



     This Agreement shall be binding upon me and my heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the
Company, its successors and assigns.



     No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged except in a
writing specifically referring to such provision and signed by the party against which
enforcement of such modification, waiver or discharge is sought. No waiver by either
party hereto of the breach of any condition or provision of this Agreement shall be
deemed a waiver of any other condition or provision at the same or any other time.



     The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, which
shall remain in full force and effect.



     The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall
be governed by the substantive laws of the State of South Carolina.



	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ David J. Paterson

	 	1/28/08	 	 
	 

Signature: David J. Paterson

	 	 

Date
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of United Health Products, Inc.., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to each such officer’s knowledge, that:





(1)    The quarterly report on form 10-q of the Company for the annual period ended June 30, 2011 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Dr. Phillip FormanPhillip Forman

Chief Executive Officer





Dated: August 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Jan E. ChasonJan E. Chason

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 350 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

311 Nebraska Reports

POPE v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department 

of Motor Vehicles of the State 

of Nebraska, appellee.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen 

R. Illingworth, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., 

for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by 

the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope 

v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 

903 (2022).

We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER 

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth paragraph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/28/2022 08:07 AM CDT
- 351 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

311 Nebraska Reports

POPE v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Cite as 311 Neb. 350

no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. 

Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as 

error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported 

violation of that statute.”

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 72 (Friday, April 12, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 16287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ASW-18]


Proposed Revision to Class E Airspace; Farmington, NM

Correction

    In proposed rule document 96-999 beginning on page 1875, in the 
issue of Wednesday, January 24, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 1876, in the third column, in Sec. 71.1, in the seventh 
line from the bottom, after the word ``long.'' insert 
``108 deg.56'54''W; to lat. 37 deg.04'00''N, long.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Ada A. GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Michael Joseph RUDISILL, Esq., Appellee.

No. 1D18-186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08245**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  08245\08245_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 08245\08245_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 08245\08245_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 08245\08245_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 08245\08245_PARTA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08245\08245_PARTB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08245\08245_PARTC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08245\08245_PARTD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08245\08245_PARTH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_Block Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_Block Diagram.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_D3-1 Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_D3-1 Diagram.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_PEARL EPA-Model.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 34342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-30625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-38724; File No. SR-Amex-97-17]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment 
Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the American Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to 
Telemarketing Practices by Members and Member Organizations

Correction

    In notice document 97-15464 beginning on page 32390 in the issue of 
Friday, June 13, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 32393, in the second column, the authorizing signature 
should read:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Fourth Amendment to the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC. 

AMENDED EXECUTIVE OFFICER PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION 
 PLAN 
 The stockholders of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on April 29, 2008 approved the Amended Executive Officer Performance-Base Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan was amended by the First Amendment effective as of January 1, 2008, by the
Second Amendment effective as of June 1, 2011, and by the Third Amendment effective as of January 1, 2012. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have a meaning ascribed to them in the Plan, as amended. This Fourth
Amendment to the Plan, upon stockholder approval of the amendment, will be effective as of January 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”). 
 RECITAL 
 Subject to stockholder approval, the Compensation Committee (the
“Committee”) of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. hereby amends Paragraphs C and D of Article III of the Plan to read in their entirety as follows: 
 AMENDMENTS 
 C. If the Performance Goal for fiscal year 2012
is achieved, each of the Covered Employees shall receive, in accordance with the terms of this Plan, no more than $3,500,000. 
 D. For 2012 and thereafter, only the Performance Goal in Paragraph A.(ii) of Article III shall apply. For 2012 and thereafter, the Adjusted Pre-Tax Return of Stockholders’ Equity Goal in Paragraph
A.(i) of Article III shall not apply and shall be deemed deleted from the Plan. 
 This Fourth Amendment, following approval of
the stockholders, has been executed on the date set forth below, to be effective as of the Effective Date set forth above. 
  

			
	M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Its:	 	
	Date:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Tsunami probability in the Caribbean Region      

      January 1, 2008    

We calculated tsunami runup probability (in excess of 0.5 m) at coastal sites throughout the Caribbean region. We applied a Poissonian probability model because of the variety of uncorrelated tsunami sources in the region. Coastlines were discretized into 20 km by 20 km cells, and the mean tsunami runup rate was determined for each cell. The remarkable ???500-year empirical record compiled by O'Loughlin and Lander (2003) was used to calculate an empirical tsunami probability map, the first of three constructed for this study. However, it is unclear whether the 500-year record is complete, so we conducted a seismic moment-balance exercise using a finite-element model of the Caribbean-North American plate boundaries and the earthquake catalog, and found that moment could be balanced if the seismic coupling coefficient is c = 0.32. Modeled moment release was therefore used to generate synthetic earthquake sequences to calculate 50 tsunami runup scenarios for 500-year periods. We made a second probability map from numerically-calculated runup rates in each cell. Differences between the first two probability maps based on empirical and numerical-modeled rates suggest that each captured different aspects of tsunami generation; the empirical model may be deficient in primary plate-boundary events, whereas numerical model rates lack backarc fault and landslide sources. We thus prepared a third probability map using Bayesian likelihood functions derived from the empirical and numerical rate models and their attendant uncertainty to weight a range of rates at each 20 km by 20 km coastal cell. Our best-estimate map gives a range of 30-year runup probability from 0 - 30% regionally. ?? irkhaueser 2008.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

## Related Content

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

### Contacts

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

### Explore Search

                  - Earthquakes | Los terremotos
                  - Tsunamis | Los maremotos
                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Sea-floor morphology and sedimentary environments in southern Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island      

      September 9, 2015    

Multibeam echosounder data collected by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration along with sediment samples and still and video photography of the sea floor collected by the U.S. Geological Survey were used to interpret sea-floor features and sedimentary environments in southern Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, as part of a long-term effort to map the sea floor along the northeastern coast of the United States. Sea-floor features include rocky areas and scour depressions in high-energy environments characterized by erosion or nondeposition, and sand waves and megaripples in environments characterized by coarse-grained bedload transport. Two shipwrecks are also located in the study area. Much of the sea floor is relatively featureless within the resolution of the multibeam data; sedimentary environments in these areas are characterized by processes associated with sorting and reworking. This report releases bathymetric data from the multibeam echosounder, grain-size analyses of sediment samples, and photographs of the sea floor and interpretations of the sea-floor features and sedimentary environments. It provides base maps that can be used for resource management and studies of topics such as benthic ecology, contaminant inventories, and sediment transport.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - narragansett bay
                  - Rhode Island

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Understanding and modeling tephra transport: Lessons learned from the 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens      

      December 16, 2022    

Discoveries made during the 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens advanced our understanding of tephra transport and deposition in fundamental ways. The eruption enabled detailed, quantitative observations of downwind cloud movement and particle sedimentation, along with the dynamics of co-pyroclastic-density current (PDC) clouds lofted from ground-hugging currents. The deposit was mapped and sampled over more than 150,000 km2 within days of the event and remains among the most thoroughly documented tephra deposits in the world. Abundant observations were made possible by the large size of the eruption, its occurrence in good weather during daylight hours, cloud movement over a large, populated continent, and the availability of images from recently deployed satellites. These observations underpinned new, quantitative models for the rise and growth of volcanic plumes, the importance of umbrella clouds in dispersing ash, and the roles of particle aggregation and gravitational instabilities in removing ash from the atmosphere. Exceptional detail in the eruption chronology and deposit characterization helped identify the eruptive phases contributing to deposition in different sectors of the distal deposit. The eruption was the first to significantly impact civil aviation, leading to the earliest documented case of in-flight engine damage. Continued eruptive activity in 1980 also motivated pioneering use of meteorological models to forecast ash-cloud movement. In this paper, we consider the most important discoveries and how they changed the science of tephra transport.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Larry G. Mastin, Ph.D.

##### Physical Volcanologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

lgmastin@usgs.gov

360-993-8925

#### Alexa Van Eaton, Ph.D.

##### Volcanologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

avaneaton@usgs.gov

360-993-8955

## Related Content

#### Larry G. Mastin, Ph.D.

##### Physical Volcanologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

lgmastin@usgs.gov

360-993-8925

#### Alexa Van Eaton, Ph.D.

##### Volcanologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

avaneaton@usgs.gov

360-993-8955

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Washington
                  - mount st. helens

View All **
CGFD65 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 9, 2020

Laurel M Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−17132−LMI

Chapter: 7

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Carlos R. Weissenberg

12344 SW 94th Lane

Miami, FL 33186

SSN: xxx−xx−2506

ORDER DETERMINING DEBTOR'S

COMPLIANCE WITH FILING REQUIREMENTS OF §521(a)(1)

 Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i), if an individual debtor in a voluntary case under chapter 7 or 13 fails to

file all of the information required under 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) within 45 days after the date of the filing of

the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day after the date of the filing

of the petition.

Page 1 of 2

Case 20-17132-LMI Doc 47 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 2
 The information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) as provided by the debtor* in this case is complete

to the satisfaction of the trustee and no creditor or other party in interest has filed a request for an order of

dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(2) as provided under Local Rule 1017−2(A)(2). Based upon the

trustee's review, the court has determined that the debtor has complied with the information requirements

of 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. This case is not subject to automatic dismissal under 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(1) or (2).

2. If any creditor or other party in interest has any reason to contest the court's finding that the

debtor has filed all information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1), that party shall file an

objection not later than 21 days from the date of the entry of this Order, and serve such

objection on the trustee, the United States Trustee, debtor, and debtor's counsel, if any. The

objection should specifically identify the information and document(s) required by 11 U.S.C.

§521(a)(1) that the debtor has failed to file.

3. Each creditor or other party in interest served with this Order who does not file an objection

within the 21 day deadline set forth above has waived the right to file a motion to dismiss this

bankruptcy case for the debtor's failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

4. Nothing in this Order shall excuse the debtor's duty to cooperate with the United States

Trustee and the trustee assigned to this case, and shall not prevent the United States Trustee

or case trustee from requesting by any authorized means, including, but not limited to motion,

that the debtor supply further information.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

* All references to "debtor" shall include and refer to both of the debtors in a case filed jointly by two

individuals.

Page 2 of 2

Case 20-17132-LMI Doc 47 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

21228

Vol. 61, No. 91

Thursday, May 9, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

8 CFR Parts 3 and 242

[EOIR No. 102F; AG Order No. 2020–96]

RIN 1125–AA01

Executive Office for Immigration

Review; Motions and Appeals in

Immigration Proceedings

Correction

Editorial Note: This correction replaces the

document published at 61 FR 19976, May 3,

1996. An additional correction to this

document appears elsewhere in the Rules

Section of this issue.

In rule document 96–10157 beginning

on page 18900 in the issue of Monday,

April 29, 1996, make the following

corrections:

§ 3.23 [Corrected]

1. On page 18908, in the first column,

in § 3.23(b)(3), the first sentence should

read ‘‘A motion to reconsider must be

filed within 30 days after the date on

which the decision for which

reconsideration is being sought was

rendered, or on or before July 31, 1996,

whichever is later.’’.

§ 3.31 [Corrected]

2. On the same page, in the third

column, in § 3.31(b), in the sixth line,

‘‘§ 3.8(a)(c)’’ should read ‘‘§ 3.8(a) and

(c)’’.

§ 242.19 [Corrected]

3. On page 18909, in the third

column, in § 242.19, in amendatory

instruction 24, in the fourth line, ‘‘(6)’’

should read ‘‘(b)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health

Administration

29 CFR Part 1910

[Docket No. S-060]

RIN 1218-AA71

Personal Protective Equipment for

General Industry

Correction

In rule document 96–10433 beginning

on page 19547 in the issue of Thursday,

May 2, 1996, make the following

correction:

§ 1910.136 [Corrected]

On page 19548, in the third column,

in the amendatory instruction to

§ 1910.136(a), in the second line from

the top, ‘‘used’’ should read ‘‘uses’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY

CORPORATION

29 CFR Part 2619

Valuation of Plan Benefits in SingleEmployer Plans; Valuation of Plan

Benefits and Plan Assets Following

Mass Withdrawal; Amendments

Adopting Additional PBGC Rates

Correction

In rule document 95–20141 beginning

on page 42037 in the issue of Tuesday,

August 15, 1995, make the following

correction:

Appendix B to Part 2619 [Corrected]

On page 42039, in Appendix B to Part

2619, the table at the top of the page

should read ‘‘Table II’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lee Horwitz,
Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Lee Horwitz

Name:	   Lee Horwitz
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   August 14, 2007