alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Reverberations on the watery element: A significant tsunamigenic historical earthquake offshore the Carolina coast      

      September 1, 2013    

We investigate an early nineteenth-century earthquake that hasbeen previously cataloged but not previously investigated indetail or recognized as a significant event. The earthquakestruck at approximately 4:30 a.m. LT on 8 January 1817 andwas widely felt throughout the southeastern and mid-AtlanticUnited States. Around 11:00 a.m. the same day, an eyewitnessdescribed a 12-inch tide that rose abruptly and agitated boatson the Delaware River near Philadelphia. We show that thetiming of this tide is consistent with the predicted travel timefor a tsunami generated by an offshore earthquake 6–7 hoursearlier. By combining constraints provided by the shaking intensitydistribution and the tsunami observation, we concludethat the 1817 earthquake had a magnitude of low- to mid-M 7and a location 800–1000 km offshore of South Carolina. Ourresults suggest that poorly understood offshore source zonesmight represent a previously unrecognized hazard to thesouthern and mid-Atlantic coast. Both observational and modelingresults indicate that potential tsunami hazard withinDelaware Bay merits consideration: the simple geometry ofthe bay appears to catch and focus tsunami waves. Our preferredlocation for the 1817 earthquake is along a diffusenortheast-trending zone defined by instrumentally recordedand historical earthquakes. The seismotectonic framework forthis region remains enigmatic.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

## Related Content

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - South Carolina Coast
                  - South Carolina

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 11, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20711]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Intent to Repatriate Native American Items in the 
Possession of the Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

Correction

    In notice document 95-16402 beginning on page 35047 in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 5, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 35048, in the first column, in the last paragraph, 
beginning in the ninth line, ``[thirty days after the publicatin date 
of this notice in the FEDERAL REGISTER].'' should read ``August 4, 
1995.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2004227EN.01000701.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3503 — PPR/FNAC/MARINOPOULOS/JV)

(2004/C 227/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3503. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3503. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
Dexter B. BOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

In re: Chapter 11 

 Case No. 20-14696-BKC-LMI 

CINEMEX HOLDINGS, USA, INC., 

 (Formerly Jointly Administered Under 

 Lead Case: Cinemex USA Real Estate 

 Reorganized Debtor. Holdings, Inc., Case No. 20-14695-LMI) 

_______________________________/ 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL AND REQUEST 

FOR REMOVAL FROM ELECTRONIC NOTICING AND FROM NOTICING AGENT 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 2091-1(A) of the Local Rules of 

Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District 

of Florida, Jerry M. Markowitz and Markowitz, Ringel, Trusty & Hartog, P.A. hereby 

withdraws their appearance as counsel to Respondent, 1025 W. Addison Street Apartments Owner, 

LLC in the above-captioned bankruptcy case. The undersigned further requests that the Clerk of 

the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, and any 

claims or noticing agent appointed in this case, remove them from the electronic and paper noticing 

matrix for the above-captioned case. 

Dated: October 27, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 MARKOWITZ, RINGEL, TRUSTY & HARTOG, P.A.

Two Datran Center, Suite 1800 

9130 South Dadeland Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33156-7815 

Phone: (305) 670-5000 // Fax: (305) 670-5011 

By: /s/ Jerry M. Markowitz 

 JERRY M. MARKOWITZ 

 Florida Bar No. 182420 

jmarkowitz@mrthlaw.com 

 ALAN R. ROSENBERG 

 Florida Bar No. 92004 

arosenberg@mrthlaw.com

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 284 Filed 10/27/21 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Notice of Withdrawal of 

Appearance was served by electronic mail via the Court’s CM/ECF notification to all counsel of 

record and interested parties registered to receive electronic noticing in this case and via U.S. Mail 

to the 1025 W. Addison Apartments Owner, LLC c/o Jason S. Olt, President, Bucksbaum Retail 

Properties, LLC, 71 S Wacker Drive, Suite 2130, Chicago, IL 60606 on October 27, 2021. 

By: /s/ Jerry M. Markowitz 

 JERRY M. MARKOWITZ 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 284 Filed 10/27/21 Page 2 of 2
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Raul Espinosa 20-19203 RAM 9/14/20 Photo ID/SS card-Not redacted ✔

2016(B), SOFA #16 and Plan do not match IVL✔ Valuation motion not filed ✔ Amend plan to correct name and address for creditor Ally Finc. to match POC#4,

Amend plan to correct address for creditor Citizens Bk to match POC#7, Amend plan to correct discrepancy with box 

selection and III B. Valuation of collateral 

✔ 13/BMW ✔ Firearms FMV (2 Pistols) ✔ #5938 (7/1-8/26, #5946 (5/26-6/30)-(7/28-8/26) ✔ #5938 6/19 $4000, 6/23 $5200; #5946 7/24 $1600, 7/10 $1370 Affidavit of support LF 90 LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity✔ Missing Attorney's Declaration & 341 Written Quest.

Case 20-19203-RAM Doc 19 Filed 09/17/20 Page 1 of 1
Joshua Carlton BELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PASCO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Richard PIERCE, an Individual, and the Brevard County Professional Firefighters, Local 2969, International Association of Firefighters, Inc., Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BREVARD COUNTY, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1834

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

K.J. BRUBAKER, J.A. FISCHER, A.C. RUGH

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MCKENZIE MOSELEY

PRIVATE FIRST CLASS (E

- 2), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMC CA 201500373

GENERAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 21 August 2015

. Military Judge: Col P.S. Rubin, USMC

. Convening Authority: Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft

Wing, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Cherry Point, NC

. Staff Judge Advocate's Reco mmendation: Col J.J. Murphy,

USMC

. For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

25 February 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

-------------------------------------------- -------

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Roger MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2455

_____________________________

JOSHUA TROY DOOLY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

May 6, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court lacked 

jurisdiction in this case to revoke Appellant’s probation and 

resentence him because he had already served the statutory 

maximum time on probation before the filing of the probation 

violation affidavit. Tate v. State, 191 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2016). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to 

discharge Appellant in Escambia County circuit court case number 

2008-CF-006266-B. Id.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

ROWE, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
July 30, 2015

Mr. Adam S. Andrews

Director of Operations

Aeroworks Productions, LLC

7740 29th Ave nue

Kenosha, WI 53143

Dear Mr. Andrews :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

part 21; § § 45.23(b)

, 61.113(a) and (b)

, 91.7(a) , 91.9(b) (2)

, 91.109

, 91.119

, 91.121

, 91.151(a)

, 91.203(a) and (b)

, 91.205(b)

, 91.215

, and 91.401

– 91.417 of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your May 19 , 2015

, exemption request on behalf of Aeroworks Productions,

LLC filed into the public docket (No. FAA− 2015

− 1765 ), but we are unable to process your

request any further. Your petiti on does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of t he exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

I f you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Snow avalanches are a primary climate-linked driver of mountain ungulate populations      

      April 29, 2024    

Snow is a major, climate-sensitive feature of the Earth’s surface and catalyst of fundamentally important ecosystem processes. Understanding how snow influences sentinel species in rapidly changing mountain ecosystems is particularly critical. Whereas effects of snow on food availability, energy expenditure, and predation are well documented, we report how avalanches exert major impacts on an ecologically significant mountain ungulate - the coastal Alaskan mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus). Using long-term GPS data and field observations across four populations (421 individuals over 17 years), we show that avalanches caused 23−65% of all mortality, depending on area. Deaths varied seasonally and were directly linked to spatial movement patterns and avalanche terrain use. Population-level avalanche mortality, 61% of which comprised reproductively important prime-aged individuals, averaged 8% annually and exceeded 22% when avalanche conditions were severe. Our findings reveal a widespread but previously undescribed pathway by which snow can elicit major population-level impacts and shape demographic characteristics of slow-growing populations of mountain-adapted animals.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Erich Peitzsch, Ph.D

##### Research Physical Scientist

Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center

epeitzsch@usgs.gov

406-599-9970

## Related Content

#### Erich Peitzsch, Ph.D

##### Research Physical Scientist

Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center

epeitzsch@usgs.gov

406-599-9970

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK) Headquarters          

2327 University WaySuite 2Bozeman, MT59715United States

406-994-7544

406-994-6556

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Social values for ecosystem services (SolVES): Documentation and user manual, version 2.0      

      February 2, 2012    

In response to the need for incorporating quantified and spatially explicit measures of social values into ecosystem services assessments, the Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center (RMGSC), in collaboration with Colorado State University, developed a geographic information system (GIS) application, Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES). With version 2.0 (SolVES 2.0), RMGSC has improved and extended the functionality of SolVES, which was designed to assess, map, and quantify the perceived social values of ecosystem services. Social values such as aesthetics, biodiversity, and recreation can be evaluated for various stakeholder groups as distinguished by their attitudes and preferences regarding public uses, such as motorized recreation and logging. As with the previous version, SolVES 2.0 derives a quantitative, 10-point, social-values metric, the Value Index, from a combination of spatial and nonspatial responses to public attitude and preference surveys and calculates metrics characterizing the underlying environment, such as average distance to water and dominant landcover. Additionally, SolVES 2.0 integrates Maxent maximum entropy modeling software to generate more complete social value maps and to produce robust statistical models describing the relationship between the social values maps and explanatory environmental variables. The performance of these models can be evaluated for a primary study area, as well as for similar areas where primary survey data are not available but where social value mapping could potentially be completed using value-transfer methodology. SolVES 2.0 also introduces the flexibility for users to define their own social values and public uses, model any number and type of environmental variable, and modify the spatial resolution of analysis. With these enhancements, SolVES 2.0 provides an improved public domain tool for decisionmakers and researchers to evaluate the social values of ecosystem services and to facilitate discussions among diverse stakeholders regarding the tradeoffs among different ecosystem services in a variety of physical and social contexts ranging from forest and rangeland to coastal and marine.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Darius Semmens

##### Research Physical Scientist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dsemmens@usgs.gov

303-236-1420

## Related Content

#### Darius Semmens

##### Research Physical Scientist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dsemmens@usgs.gov

303-236-1420

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of The Jackson Rivers Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis Lauzon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       /s/ Dennis Lauzon
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Dennis Lauzon, Chief Executive Officer
                                       Date: April 12, 2004


                                        3
<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10630 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID DEFINA, also known as Syde Patrick Defina,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CR-49-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 17, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

David Defina appeals from his sentence for possession with

intent to distribute approximately two kilograms of cocaine.

Defina pleaded guilty under his brother’s name in order to conceal

the fact that Defina was on probation at the time of his offense.

Defina’s true name was discovered prior to sentencing and he was

given a sentence enhancement for obstruction of justice.

Defina argues that the district court erred in failing to

reduce his offense level for acceptance of responsibility pursuantNo. 97-10630

-2-

to United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1. We review

the district court’s finding of acceptance of responsibility under

a standard even more deferentia l than the clearly-erroneous

standard. U nited States v. Ainsworth

, 932 F.2d 358, 362 (5th Cir.

1991); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual [hereinafter U.S.S.G.] §

3E1.1 comment. (n.5).

Defina bore the burden of “demonstrating the recognition and

affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility.” U nited States

v. Ayala

, 47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir. 1995); see U.S.S.G.

§ 3E1.1(a). Defina’s burden was much higher because a defendant

who has received a sentence enhancement for obstruction of justice

will not be g ranted a sentence reduction for acceptance of

responsibility, except under “extraordinary” circumstances.

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a) comment. (n.4). Defina’s attempts to meet this

burden were clearly insufficient.

As Defina did not meet his burden of proof, it was proper for

the district court to summarily deny him the sentence reduction for

acceptance of responsibility.

AFFIRMED.