alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 24593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-30504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-39413; File No. SR-PCX-97-37]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment 
Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Market 
Maker Outside Trading Accounts

Correction

    In notice document 98-32756 beginning on page 65840, in the issue 
of Tuesday, December 16, 1997, under the subject heading, insert 
``December 8, 1997.''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# L_2004370EN.01005401.xml

| 17.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 370/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 370/54

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2156/2004

of 16 December 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 15 December 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 15 December 2004.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 15 December 2004, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 31,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 8 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 9 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 10 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 11 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 12 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 13 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 14 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 15 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 16 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 17 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 18 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 19 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 20 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 21 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 22 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 23 of 24
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-38 Filed 10/22/20 Page 24 of 24
G.W., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D18-25

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 2, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

YOSBEL R MORALES REYES a/k/a Yosbel Morales Reyes 

a/k/a Yosbel Ramon Morales Reyes a/k/a Yosbel Ramon 

Morales a/k/a Yosbel Morales a/k/a Yosbel R. Morales,

Debtor 

___________________________________/

CASE NO: 20-14643-AJC

CHAPTER 13

REGIONS BANK D/B/A REGIONS MORTGAGE'S PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO 

DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM

Regions Bank d/b/a Regions Mortgage ("Secured Creditor"), by and through its undersigned 

counsel, files this Preliminary Response to Debtor’s Objection to Claim, and in support thereof 

states as follows:

1. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition pursuant to Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code 

on April 23, 2020.

2. Secured Creditor holds a security interest in the Debtor's real property located at 

14444 NW 87th Pl, Hialeah, FL 33018 (the “Property”), by virtue of a Mortgage which is recorded 

in Official Records Book 28035, at Page 4374, of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, 

Florida (the “Mortgage”). The Mortgage secures a Note in the amount of $172,000.00 (the “Note”).

3. The Mortgage gives Secured Creditor a first lien on the Property.

4. Secured Creditor filed Claim No. 14-1 in this case on May 19, 2020.

5. The Debtor filed an objection to the Claim (Doc 15).

6. The Debtor does not dispute the fact that the Proof of Claim is timely filed before the 

claim bar date. As such, Secured Creditor submits the filing of said claim “shall constitute prima 

facie evidence of the validity and amount of the claim.” Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001 (f).

Case 20-14643-AJC Doc 22 Filed 06/17/20 Page 1 of 2
7. Secured Creditor does not object to Debtor’s request to allow the Claim with no 

distribution from the Chapter 13 Trustee. 

WHEREFORE, Secured Creditor seeks an entry of an Order allowing its Claim in full, with 

no distribution from the Trustee.

Attorney for Secured Creditor

2001 Northwest 64th Street, Suite 130

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Phone: 813-342-2200

Fax: 954-618-6954

Floridabklegal@Brockandscott.com

/s/ Patrick Hruby

______________________________________

PATRICK HRUBY, ESQUIRE

Florida Bar No. 0088657

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy hereof has been served electronically or via U.S. 

mail, first-class postage prepaid, to: YOSBEL R MORALES REYES, 14444 NW 87TH PLACE, 

MIAMI LAKES, FL 33018; Robert Sanchez, 355 W 49 St., Hialeah, FL 33012; Nancy K. Neidich, 

POB 279806, Miramar, FL 33027; Office of the US Trustee, 51 S.W. 1st Ave., Suite 1204, Miami, 

FL 33130, this 17th day of June, 2020.

BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC

Attorney for Secured Creditor

2001 Northwest 64th Street, Suite 130

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Phone: 813-342-2200

Fax: 954-618-6954

Floridabklegal@Brockandscott.com

/s/ Patrick Hruby

______________________________________

PATRICK HRUBY, ESQUIRE

Florida Bar No. 0088657

Case 20-14643-AJC Doc 22 Filed 06/17/20 Page 2 of 2
William KNIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1239

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 105 (Monday, June 2, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 29783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10602]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 105 / Monday, June 2, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 29783]]



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

Correction

    In notice document 97-13088 appearing on page 27281 in the issue of 
Monday, May 19, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 27281, in the first column, in the subject heading and 
in the first paragraph, in the nineth line, ``important'' should read 
``importation''.
    2. On the same page, in the second column, in the third paragraph, 
in the last line, ``(30 days from publication)'' should read ``June 18, 
1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 6563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2837]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $1.74 billion loan 
to support the export of approximately $1.5 billion worth of mining, 
port and rail equipment to Australia. The U.S. exports will enable the 
Australian mining company to increase production by about 100 million 
metric tons of iron ore per year during the 8.5-year repayment term of 
the financing. Available information indicates that all of the 
additional Australian iron ore production will be sold in China, Japan 
and Korea. Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction 
by email to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue 
NW., Room 1051, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register.

David M. Sena,
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (acting).
[FR Doc. 2012-2837 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
STATE EX REL. Clyde E. SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0682

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Vanessa Lynn PAGE v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01456-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: July 3, 2018 Closed: August 16, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Role of the wolf in a deer decline in the Superior National Forest      

      January 1, 1977    

White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) declined in the Superior National Forest of Minnesota between 1968 and 1974. In a 3,000 sq km area of the poorest habitat, deer were decimated. Contributing factors were severe winters, deteriorating habitat, and wolves. Wolves killed older deer, but insufficient fawns were available to replace them.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David Mech, PhD

##### Senior Research Scientist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

david_mech@usgs.gov

651-647-0408

## Related Content

#### David Mech, PhD

##### Senior Research Scientist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

david_mech@usgs.gov

651-647-0408

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 11194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50301]




Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 40/Wednesday, March 1, 1995/
Corrections

[[Page 11194]]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program Grantee Workshop; 
Notice

Correction

    In notice document 95-2785 appearing on page 7062 in the issue of 
Monday, February 6, 1995, make the following correction:
    In the third column, the heading should read as set forth above and 
in the second paragraph, in the second line ``Guarantee'' should read 
``Grantee''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Structure and vulnerability of Pacific Northwest tidal wetlands – A summary of wetland climate change research by the Western Ecology Division, U.S. EPA      

      September 16, 2014    

Climate change poses a serious threat to the tidal wetlands of the Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of the U.S. In response to this threat, scientists at the Western Ecology Division of the U.S. EPA at and the Western Fisheries Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with other partners, initiated a series of studies on the structure and vulnerability of tidal wetlands to climate change. One research thrust was to evaluate community structure of PNW marshes, experimentally assess the vulnerability of marsh plants to inundation and salinity stress (as would happen with sea level rise), and evaluate the utility of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) classification system. Another research thrust was to develop tools that provide insights into possible impacts of climate change. This effort included enhancing the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) to predict the effects of sea level rise on submerged aquatic vegetation (Zostera marina) distributions, evaluating changes in river flow into coastal estuaries in response to precipitation changes, and synthesizing Pacific Coast estuary, watershed, and climate data in a downloadable tool. Because the research resulting from these efforts was published in multiple venues, we summarized them in this document. We anticipate that future research efforts by the U.S. EPA will continue with a focus on climate change impacts on a regional scale.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Western Fisheries Research Center (WFRC)          

6505 NE 65th StreetSeattle, WA98115-5016United States

(206) 526-6282

(206) 526-6654

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States
                  - california
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Washington

View All **
CGFD65 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 10, 2021

Mindy A Mora

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 21−10700−MAM

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Jeffrey Alan Ashburn

aka Jeffrey A Ashburn, aka Jeffrey Ashburn

7600 SE Gull Way

Hobe Sound, FL 33455

SSN: xxx−xx−7652

Tracy Mae Ashburn

aka Tracy M Ashburn, aka Tracy Ashburn

7600 SE Gull Way

Hobe Sound, FL 33455

SSN: xxx−xx−5483

ORDER DETERMINING DEBTOR'S

COMPLIANCE WITH FILING REQUIREMENTS OF §521(a)(1)

 Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i), if an individual debtor in a voluntary case under chapter 7 or 13 fails to

file all of the information required under 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) within 45 days after the date of the filing of

the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day after the date of the filing

of the petition.

Page 1 of 2

Case 21-10700-MAM Doc 24 Filed 05/10/21 Page 1 of 2
 The information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) as provided by the debtor* in this case is complete

to the satisfaction of the trustee and no creditor or other party in interest has filed a request for an order of

dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(2) as provided under Local Rule 1017−2(A)(2). Based upon the

trustee's review, the court has determined that the debtor has complied with the information requirements

of 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. This case is not subject to automatic dismissal under 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(1) or (2).

2. If any creditor or other party in interest has any reason to contest the court's finding that the

debtor has filed all information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1), that party shall file an

objection not later than 21 days from the date of the entry of this Order, and serve such

objection on the trustee, the United States Trustee, debtor, and debtor's counsel, if any. The

objection should specifically identify the information and document(s) required by 11 U.S.C.

§521(a)(1) that the debtor has failed to file.

3. Each creditor or other party in interest served with this Order who does not file an objection

within the 21 day deadline set forth above has waived the right to file a motion to dismiss this

bankruptcy case for the debtor's failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

4. Nothing in this Order shall excuse the debtor's duty to cooperate with the United States

Trustee and the trustee assigned to this case, and shall not prevent the United States Trustee

or case trustee from requesting by any authorized means, including, but not limited to motion,

that the debtor supply further information.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

* All references to "debtor" shall include and refer to both of the debtors in a case filed jointly by two

individuals.

Page 2 of 2

Case 21-10700-MAM Doc 24 Filed 05/10/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our reports dated February 29, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management's assessment of effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Digimarc Corporation included in the Annual Report of Digimarc Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the registration statements of Digimarc Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108670,
effective September 10, 2003, File No. 333-142125, effective April 13, 2007) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31114, effective
February 25, 2000, File No. 333-42042, effective July 24, 2000, File No. 333-65256, effective July 17, 2001, File
No. 333-82660, effective February 13, 2002, File No. 333-105097, effective May 8, 2003, File No. 333-115074, effective
April 30, 2004, File No. 333-128096, effective September 2, 2005, and File No. 333-141206, effective March 9, 2007).

/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Portland,
Oregon
February 29, 2008

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 95-60320

_______________________
DAVID TORJUSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, By and Through Mike Moore, Attorney General, ET AL, Defendants, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, By and Through Mike Moore, Attorney General; JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; JAMES R. HOSKINS, Individually and in His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; GLENN D. BROCHARD, Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of the Jackson County Port Authority Board; CHARLES PERSONS, Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; OSCAR R. JORDON, Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; BETTY ENGLE, Individually and In Her Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; STATE STALLWORTH, SR.,Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; CURTIS BRIGHT, Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; WILLIAM MITCHELL, Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority Board; ALLEN MOELLAR, Individually and In His Official Capacity as The Harbor Master for The Jackson County Port Authority; DONALD A. FOSTER, doing business as Pascagoula Bar Pilots Association; MICHAEL CHARLES TORJUSEN, doing business as Pascagoula Bar Pilots Association; RONNIE ROBERTSON, doing business as Pascagoula Bar Pilots Association; JOHNNY S. TILLMAN, Individually and In His Official Capacity As A Commissioner of The Jackson County Port Authority; MICHAEL CASEY, doing business as Pascagoula Bar Pilots Association; ROBERT T. BAKER, doing business as Pascagoula Bar Pilots Association; MICHAEL lUMPTON, doing business as Pascagoula Bar Pilots Association, Defendants-Appellees,* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not prec edent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 2 and PAUL SMITH, Individually and In His Official Capacity As the Director for The Jackson County Port Authority
Defendant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

_________________________________________________________________ June 12, 1996 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has considered appellant’s position in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so,

we find n o reversible error of fact or law and affirm for essentially t he reasons stated by the district court in it’s careful and thorough opinion.

AFFIRMED
.