alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Pattern and process of prescribed fires influence effectiveness at reducing wildfire severity in dry coniferous forests      

      June 6, 2012    

We examined the effects of three early season (spring) prescribed fires on burn severity patterns of summer wildfires that occurred 1–3 years post-treatment in a mixed conifer forest in central Idaho. Wildfire and prescribed fire burn severities were estimated as the difference in normalized burn ratio (dNBR) using Landsat imagery. We used GIS derived vegetation, topography, and treatment variables to generate models predicting the wildfire burn severity of 1286–5500 30-m pixels within and around treated areas. We found that wildfire severity was significantly lower in treated areas than in untreated areas and significantly lower than the potential wildfire severity of the treated areas had treatments not been implemented. At the pixel level, wildfire severity was best predicted by an interaction between prescribed fire severity, topographic moisture, heat load, and pre-fire vegetation volume. Prescribed fire severity and vegetation volume were the most influential predictors. Prescribed fire severity, and its influence on wildfire severity, was highest in relatively warm and dry locations, which were able to burn under spring conditions. In contrast, wildfire severity peaked in cooler, more mesic locations that dried later in the summer and supported greater vegetation volume. We found considerable evidence that prescribed fires have landscape-level influences within treatment boundaries; most notable was an interaction between distance from the prescribed fire perimeter and distance from treated patch edges, which explained up to 66% of the variation in wildfire severity. Early season prescribed fires may not directly target the locations most at risk of high severity wildfire, but proximity of these areas to treated patches and the discontinuity of fuels following treatment may influence wildfire severity and explain how even low severity treatments can be effective management tools in fire-prone landscapes.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30129]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Computer Matching Programs

Correction

    In notice document 96-778 beginning on page 1817 in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 23, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 1817, in the third column, under EFFECTIVE DATE:, ``[Insert 
date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register].'' should read 
``February 22, 1996.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
DAN BENISHEK M.D. FIRST DISTRICT, MICHIGAN

514 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515-2201 {202) 225-4735 WWW.BENISHEK.HOUSE.GOV 

# <!Congre%5 of

# tbe Wniteb**~tates ~ou.sr**  

# of 3Repre£entatibc%

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Chief, Essential Air Service Division, 

### X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### 400

## ih St. SW Washington, D.C. 

### 20050 Dear Kevin, January 

### 29, 2014 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS

'
....**-~'**

',"""1
•••1 ''··. ·,

Iwrite to you todayto informyou ofapossible gap in Essential Air Service (EAS) provided to the community served bythe Gogebic-lron County Airport (IWD} in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. It has come to my attention that as of February 1, 

### 2014, IWD will lose its sole commercial carrier, Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. It is my understandingthat a request for proposals (RFP} has been issued for new commercial airline service to IWD, with a deadline of February 5, 

### 2014. I know you share my concern that commercial air service forthe Gogebic County community not be interrupted. Any gap in service could damage the passenger base in the community, making it more difficultfor another airline totake over service. The long term loss ofairservice from IWD thatcould result would have a real and lasting negative effect on Northern Michigan's economy. Please answer the following questions to help me understand what steps are being taken to address this important issue: 

### 1. What is the Department ofTransportation (DOT) doing to ensure thatthe community serviced by IWD does not lose EASon February 1? 2. What is DOT's plan ofaction to continue EAS should no successful airline bids be submitted? 3. The current EAS contract held by Great Lakes Aviation does not expire until May 

### 31, 2014. Does Great Lakes Aviation have acontractual responsibility to ensure that service is continued withoutany interruption until anotherairline can takeover? I look forward to continuing to work with you to ensure that service is continued at IWD until such time as another carrier can take overfor Great Lakes Aviation. Please contact me directly at 

### (202)225-4735 with any additional questions or concerns. Sincerely,

Dan Benishek, M.D. MemberofCongress

PRINTED IN MICHIGAN ON MICHIGAN MADE PAPER.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with amendment 1 to the Annual Report of Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2014 (the Report), I, Anand Vadapalli, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as created by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2015 |  | /s/ Anand Vadapalli                      
|                     | 
|                     |  | Anand Vadapalli                          
|                     | 
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer    
|                     | 
|                     |  | Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Semiquantitative spectrographic method for analysis of minerals, rocks, and ores              

      January 1, 1953    

The quantity and complex nature of materials received for analysis in the spectrographic laboratories of the U. S. Geological Survey have emphasized the need for a spectrographic method to determine a maximum number of elements in a limited time with a reasonable degree of accuracy. The semiquantitative method described determines 68 elements in one arcing of a 10-mg. sample. The method has been used to complete 245,000 determinations during a 3-year period. Each determination is reported as a concentration range or bracket (0.001 to 0.01, 0.01 to 0.1%, etc.). A chemical check of 500 such determinations showed 92% in agreement; the remaining 8% agreed to within one bracket. The method requires a minimum of sample handling, thus reducing the chances of contamination, detects low concentrations of elements, and is rapid. Analyses have been completed on a wide variety of materials.

## Citation Information
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Rolando Guzman Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 1,500.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 1,500.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

June 29, 2020 /s/ ALEXIS GARCIA

Date ALEXIS GARCIA

Signature of Attorney

Prada Law

1450 NW 87 Avenue

Suite 210

Doral, FL 33172

3052031059 Fax: 7865134627

agrcia@prada.law

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-17107-AJC Doc 6 Filed 06/29/20 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .


EXHIBIT 12  - COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        FOR THE YEAR         FOR THE YEAR        FOR THE YEAR
                                                           ENDED                ENDED                ENDED
                                                        DECEMBER 31,         DECEMBER 31,         DECEMBER 31,
                                                           2002                 2001                 2000
                                                       -------------        -------------        ------------
                                                                         (Dollars in millions)
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>                    <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:

    Net income before extraordinary charge and
        cumulative effect of accounting change         $     171.0          $     118.5          $     115.4
    Add: Income taxes                                         29.4                 69.5                 40.4
             Equity income from joint venture                 (2.9)                (3.0)                (2.0)
             Other (income) loss                               1.5                  1.1                   --
             Fixed charges                                    47.5                 60.7                 76.5
                                                       -----------          -----------          -----------
Adjusted earnings                                      $     246.5          $     246.8          $     230.3
                                                       ===========          ===========          ===========

Fixed charges                                          $      47.5          $      60.7          $      76.5
                                                       ===========          ===========          ===========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                             5.2                  4.1                  3.0
                                                       ===========          ===========          ===========
</TABLE>
Brenton CRABTREE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Potential impacts of an autumn oil spill on polar bears summering on land in northern Alaska      

      March 30, 2024    

Demand for oil and natural gas continues to increase, leading to the development of remote regions where it is riskier to operate. Many of these regions have had limited development, so understanding potential impacts to wildlife could inform management decisions. In 2017, the United States passed legislation allowing oil and gas development in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northeastern Alaska. This area has received limited industrial development and is an important region for polar bears that use the coastline as a travel corridor in autumn. We sought to understand how an autumn near-shore oil spill in the Refuge could affect polar bears. We simulated oil spills from shallow sub-sea pipelines at 3 locations along the coastline of the Refuge and allowed spills to discharge 4800 barrels of oil per day for 6 days, and tracked oil for 50 days. We interacted the trajectories with simulated polar bear movements to estimate how many bears might be exposed. Oil spread quickly along the coastline and during some weeks exposed an average of 10 bears (95 % CI: 0–37) to lethal levels of oil, and 60 (95 % CI: 9–120) to sub-lethal levels. Our results suggest a significant number of polar bears could become oiled from a spill in the region and require decontamination. Therefore, future mitigation strategies could include careful siting of future development and additional capacity to capture and decontaminate bears in the event of an oil spill.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Todd Atwood, Ph.D.

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Alaska Science Center

tatwood@usgs.gov

907-786-7093

####             George Durner, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Zoologist

Alaska Science Center

## Related Content

#### Todd Atwood, Ph.D.

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Alaska Science Center

tatwood@usgs.gov

907-786-7093

####             George Durner, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Zoologist

Alaska Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05015

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05015\05015_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05015\05015_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05015\05015_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05015\05015_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05015\05015_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05015\05015_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05015\Certification Statement Plant ID 05015.PDF Plant certification statement

x 05015\Supporting Documents\Site Plan 2(landfill).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05015\Supporting Documents\Dickerson wwts for Part D.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05015\05015_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05015\05015_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05015\05015_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

CASE NO. 20-16595-AJC

Chapter 11

IN RE:

Astor EB-5, LLC,

Debtor. / 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND 365(d)(3) PERIOD

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for a hearing on July 22, 2020 at 10:30

AM on Debtor’s Motion to Extend the 365(d)(3) Period [ECF 19] (the "Motion"). Good 

cause having been shown, and for the reasons stated on the record, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

The Motion is GRANTED. The Debtor shall have an enlargement of the 365(d)

(3) period until August 16, 2020 within which to pay the July and August rent. The

Court will conduct a status hearing on August 13, 2020 at 2:00 PM by telephone.

# # #

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 5, 2020.

Case 20-16595-AJC Doc 42 Filed 08/06/20 Page 1 of 2
Effective August 1, 2020. If you plan to appear for a hearing by telephone before Judge 

A. Jay Cristol, all requests must be arranged through Court Solutions LLC no later than 

3:00 PM, one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be 

arranged online at www.court-solutions.com/SignUp. If you are unable to register online, 

you may make a reservation by calling (917) 746-7476.

Submitted by:

Joel M. Aresty, Esq. 

Email: aresty@icloud.com

Telephone: 305-904-1903

Attorney Aresty is directed to serve a copy of this Order within the time frame established by 

Local Rule 5005-1(G)(1)(c) and to file a certificate of service conforming with the requirements 

of Local Rule 2002-1(f).

Case 20-16595-AJC Doc 42 Filed 08/06/20 Page 2 of 2
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Astor EB-5, LLC Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 11

CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT (RULE 7007.1)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7007.1 and to enable the Judges to evaluate possible disqualification or

recusal, the undersigned counsel for Astor EB-5, LLC in the above captioned action, certifies that the following is a

(are) corporation(s), other than the debtor or a governmental unit, that directly or indirectly own(s) 10% or more of any

class of the corporation's(s') equity interests, or states that there are no entities to report under FRBP 7007.1:

 None [Check if applicable]

June 17, 2020 /s/ Joel M. Aresty

Date Joel M. Aresty 197483

Signature of Attorney or Litigant

Counsel for Astor EB-5, LLC

Joel M. Aresty P.A.

309 1st Ave S

Tierra Verde, FL 33715

305-904-1903 Fax:800-559-1870

aresty@icloud.com

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-16595-AJC Doc 2 Filed 06/17/20 Page 1 of 1
AMERICAN TROPICAL SIGNS AND SERVICES, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Alec BLOTNICK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 193 (Thursday, October 3, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 51751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-21003]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

45 CFR Part 1386

RIN 0970-AB11

Developmental Disabilities Program

Correction

    In rule document 96-24508 beginning on page 51142, in the issue of 
Monday, September 30, 1996, make the following correction:

Sec. 1386.30  [Corrected]

    On page 51159, in the third column, amendatory instruction number 
23 to Sec. 1386.30 should read as set forth below:
    ``23. Section 1386.30 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and 
(c)(1); redesignating paragraph (e) as (f); republishing newly 
redesignated paragraph (f), introductory text; revising the newly 
redesignated paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4); and adding new 
paragraphs (c)(3) and (e) to read as follows:''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           On the lognormality of historical magnetic-storm intensity statistics: Implications for extreme-event probabilities      

      July 22, 2015    

An examination is made of the hypothesis that the statistics of magnetic storm maximum intensities are the realization of a lognormal stochastic process. Weighted least squares and maximum likelihood methods are used to fit lognormal functions to −Dst storm time maxima for years 1957–2012; bootstrap analysis is used to established confidence limits on forecasts. Both methods provide fits that are reasonably consistent with the data; both methods also provide fits that are superior to those that can be made with a power‐law function. In general, the maximum likelihood method provides forecasts having tighter confidence intervals than those provided by weighted least squares. From extrapolation of maximum likelihood fits: a magnetic storm with intensity exceeding that of the 1859 Carrington event, −Dst ≥ 850 nT, occurs about 1.13 times per century and a wide 95% confidence interval of [0.42, 2.41] times per century; a 100 year magnetic storm is identified as having a −Dst ≥ 880 nT (greater than Carrington) but a wide 95% confidence interval of [490, 1187] nT.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with Annual Report of New Dragon Asia Corp. and its subsidiaries
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Heng Jing Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Dated: September
              28,
              2006
            By:
            /s/ Li Xia
              WangName:
            Li Xia WangTitle:
            Chief Executive
              Officer