alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nathaniel Energy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.






Dated: November 12, 2004      /s/ George A. Cretecos

                            -----------------------------
                            George A. Cretecos
                            Chief Operating Officer
                            (Principal Executive Officer and
                            Principal Accounting Officer)






                                  End of Filing
Calvin Gene WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3594

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.1


SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE TERMS HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH ASTERISKS (***).






Contract #8840




AMENDMENT TO
GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) to the GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT between KERR-MCGEE GATHERING LLC (“Gatherer”) and KERR-MCGEE OIL AND GAS ONSHORE LP (“Shipper”) effective July 1, 2010 (“Agreement”) is dated to be effective August 1, 2017 (“Amendment Effective Date”).  Gatherer and Shipper may be referred to individually as “Party”, or collectively as “Parties”.


For additional valuable consideration received and acknowledged, and in consideration of the provisions herein, the Parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 3.  Service Level and Rates Paragraph C. is amended by deleting the following sentence after the first sentence:




“In addition, Shipper shall pay Gatherer a processing fee of $*** per MMBtu for Gas delivered to the Platte Valley Plant Delivery Point.”


		
	2.
	Section 1.  Term is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




This Agreement commences on July 1, 2010 and shall be coterminous with the termination date of the last effective SRC Service Level pursuant to the Gas Processing Agreement between Shipper, Gatherer, and WGR Asset Holding Company LLC dated August 1, 2017 (“K21084”). Upon expiration of the Primary Term this Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of one year, continuing thereafter on a year-to-year basis.


		
	3.
	Exhibit C to the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following Receipt Points:


         	
					
	METER
	 
	METER NAME
	 
	OPERATOR NAME

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	***
	 
	***
	 
	Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	***
	 
	***
	 
	Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	***
	 
	***
	 
	Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP








1





4.Except as modified herein, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect as originally written or previously amended.


5.The Parties may execute and deliver this Amendment in any number of counterparts, including facsimile and *.pdf format counterparts, each of which is deemed and original, but all of which constitute the same instrument.




The Parties have executed this AMENDMENT TO GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT to be effective on the Amendment Effective Date.




	
					
	GATHERER:
	 
	SHIPPER:

	KERR-MCGEE GATHERING LLC
	 
	KERR-MCGEE OIL AND GAS ONSHORE LP

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Craig W. Collins
	 
	By:
	/s/ Craig Walters

	Name:
	Craig W. Collins
	 
	Name:
	Craig Walters

	Title:
	SVP and Chief Operating Officer
	 
	Title:
	VP, Rockies Operations








2
INRE: 

RAUL ESPINOSA 

Debtor(s) 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO: 20-19203 

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO EXEMPTIONS 

AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING 

Nancy K Neidich, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, files this Objection to Exemptions as the 

Trustee objects to the exemption of property as stated in the debtor(s)' Schedules as being over 

the legal limit and/or raising a question as to the amount of the claimed exemption and therefore 

it does not appear that the debtors are entitled to same and therefore excessive or inappropriate 

exemptions should be stricken and disallowed. Objecting specifically as checked: 

_a) Homestead property which is multi-family (duplex) or not actually used as homestead. 

_ b) Personal property exempted over $1000 with or $5000 without Homestead exemption. 

_ c) Tenants By the Entireties, evidence of joint title and motion served on all creditors with a 

statement of which property is jointly held and requiring objection from any joint creditor 

_ d) Bare Legal Title, evidence that the debtor has never contributed to the payment, 

maintenance, or use. OR NOT A GIFT (or that there is no equity in the property for the estate) 

_ e) Vague exemption in the amount stated, description of asset, or citation of exemption. 

_ f) Wages, evidence of head of family (if joint case need specific debtor claiming exemption) 

and 6 months bank statements with deposits traced. 

_ g) Automobile exemption in excess of $1000.00 or is split between more than one 

automobile. 

_X _ h) Valuation Issues: the debtor did not timely provide the Trustee with requested valuation, 

including but not limited to bank statements, real property or vehicles. 

_ i) Proof of pension or 401K statement 

_j) Use of improper application of exemption: residency 522(b)(3), not eligible for 

exemption 

_ k) Other evidence of 222/25(3) 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing and the Notice of Hearing 

generated by the Clerk of the Court was served through ECF on debtor's attorney on the same day 

as the objection is filed with the Clerk of the Court. 

Submitted by 

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE 

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 441856 

P.O. BOX 279806 

MIRAMAR, FL 33027 

(954) 443-4402 

Case 20-19203-RAM Doc 26 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 230


General Rules and Regulations, Securities Act of 1933

CFR Correction

    In Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 200 to 239, 
revised as of April 1, 1997, page 445, Part 230, the authority citation 
for the part is corrected by removing ``78t'' and replacing it with 
``79t''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Michael Harry SARDER, Petitioner, v. Major Jeff CLOUTIER, Director, Alachua County Department of the Jail, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2205

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 1, 2018

Stacy A. Scott, Public Defender, and Rachael J. O'Brien, Assistant Public Defender, Gainesville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
4/3/13 page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR) 

 Chemical ID: P-13-0346 Reviewer: Kwon/SS 

 

 

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary 

Exposure Scenario1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air 

Drinking Water Fish Ingestion 

ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q104 

CC = 1 

PDM 

Days 

Exceede

d 

LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD 

Release 

activity(ies)2; 

exposure 

calculation(s)3 

mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day 

PROC: max acute 

eco 

--- --- --- --- 7.70E+00 --- --- --- --- --- --- 

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 

2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manufacturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release activity labels.Multiple 

release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 

3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (ADR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). 

There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario.CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 

4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily streamflow of the seven 

consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period. 

Remarks: 
4/3/13 page of 

 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-13-0346 Assessor: Kwon/SS 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

 Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: 

 Release Activity: PROC: Max ADR 

 Release Description: WATER LANDFILL 

Non-sludge/Sludge 

STACK FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

 (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

 

 Non-sludge/Sludge 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

 (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) 

Remarks: 
4/3/13 page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-13-0346 

SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES 

SCENARIO #: 1 Number of Sites: RELEASE ACTIVITY:PROC: 

Max ADR 

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: 

SIC-CODE (S): EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult 

WWT 

REMOVAL 

(%) 

RELEASE 

DAYS 

PRETREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(kg/site/day) 

POSTTREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(kg/site/day) 

DWT 

(%) BCF 

(L/kg) 

 0.00 2980.00 

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER 

PLANT 

TYPE 

% ILE 

FACILITY 

STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. (μg/l) 

Harmonic 

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 

Harmonic 

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 

ALL 50 0.19 0.55 0.94 1.06 

ALL 10 1.69 3.38 7.70 6.82 

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES 

Exposure Units 

Drinking Water Results Drinking 

Water Units Fish Ingestion Results 

Fish 

Ingestion 

Units 

50% 10% 50% 10% 

Cancer 

LADDpot 4.13E-08 3.61E-07 mg/kg/day 5.28E-07 4.61E-06 mg/kg/day 

LADCpot 2.12E-06 1.85E-05 mg/L 6.31E-03 5.52E-02 mg/kg 

Acute 

ADRpot 4.61E-05 2.83E-04 mg/kg/day 1.04E-03 9.05E-03 mg/kg/day 

SIC Code Comments: 
4/3/13 page of 

 
4/3/13 page of 
4/3/13 page of 
4/3/13 page of 

 
4/3/13 page of 
4/3/13 page of 
4/3/13 page of 

 
4/3/13 page of
John Alexander BARNES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Water resources of Camas Prairie, south-central Idaho      

      January 1, 1978    

View Document

Ground-water pumpage in Camas Prairie, Idaho, for irrigation and municipal supplies totaled nearly 9,500 acre-feet in 1977. Declines of pressure head in the artesian aquifer have ranged from 3 to 12 feet since 1974 when increased ground-water pumping began. A comparison of water-level measurements made in September 1957 and September 1977 shows declines of more than 30 feet in places in the artesian aquifer. Camas Prairie aquifers are recharged by percolation from streams and by precipitation on the valley floor. Estimated mean annual recharge to the artesian aquifer is 37,000 acre-feet. Vertical recharge from the artesian aquifer to the overlying water-table aquifer is estimated to be 20,000 acre-feet annually. Declines in artesian pressure caused by increased irrigation pumping will result in a reduction of recharge from the artesian aquifer to the water-table aquifer. Yields from irrigation wells in the prairie ranged from 400 to slightly more than 2,000 gallons per minute. Flows in Camas Creek in the 1977 drought year averaged 9,400 acre-feet, compared with 138,000 acre-feet in a normal year. Surface and ground waters sampled in the basin were either a sodium or calcium bicarbonate type water. Dissolved-solids concentrations ranged from 61 to 284 milligrams per liter. (Woodard-USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Camas Prairie
                  - Idaho

View All **
<PAGE>

64204

<TABLE>
<S><C>

                    NUMBER                                                                SHARES

                    CB                     COMMUNITY BANCORP INC.


         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS                                       SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
          OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                                CUSIP    20342P 10 9




         This Certifies that





        is the record holder of

                      FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.625 PAR VALUE, OF

                       -------------------                         --------------------
                    ----------------------  COMMUNITY BANCORP INC. ------------------------
                       -------------------                         --------------------

           transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
           attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until
           countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

             WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.

           Dated:




  /s/ [illegible]         /s/ [illegible]                  [SEAL]                    /s/ [illegible]

   CHAIRMAN      PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                                   SECRETARY

</TABLE>


                                            COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED
                                               U.S. STOCK TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                                   TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

                                            BY

                                                          AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Preliminary investigation of submerged aquatic vegetation mapping using hyperspectral remote sensing      

      January 1, 2003    

The use of airborne hyperspectral remote sensing imagery for automated mapping of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in the tidal Potomac River was investigated for near to realtime resource assessment and monitoring. Airborne hyperspectral imagery and field spectrometer measurements were obtained in October of 2000. A spectral library database containing selected ground-based and airborne sensor spectra was developed for use in image processing. The spectral library is used to automate the processing of hyperspectral imagery for potential real-time material identification and mapping. Field based spectra were compared to the airborne imagery using the database to identify and map two species of SAV (Myriophyllum spicatum and Vallisneria americana). Overall accuracy of the vegetation maps derived from hyperspectral imagery was determined by comparison to a product that combined aerial photography and field based sampling at the end of the SAV growing season. The algorithms and databases developed in this study will be useful with the current and forthcoming space-based hyperspectral remote sensing systems.

## Citation Information
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0530 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-075-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-31009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 510


New Animal Drugs

CFR Correction

    In Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 500 to 599, 
revised as of April 1, 1997, on page 48, in Sec. 510.515, paragraph 
(c), entry 5 is amended by adding ``Arsanilic acid'' below 
``Chlortetracyline'' in the first column.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Monetary Systems, Ltd. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Donald M. Mardak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Donald F. Mardak





Donald F. Mardak


Chief Executive Officer





August 14, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Reversals of the earth's magnetic field      

      January 1, 1964    

Recent paleomagnetic and geochronologic data provide information on time and frequency of field reversals.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Organic compounds in Potomac River water used for public supply near Washington, D.C., 2003-05      

      December 18, 2008    

Organic compounds studied in this U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessment generally are man-made, including, in part, pesticides, solvents, gasoline hydrocarbons, personal care and domestic-use products, and refrigerants and propellants. A total of 85 of 277 compounds were detected at least once among the 25 samples collected approximately monthly during 2003-05 at the intake of the Washington Aqueduct, one of several community water systems on the Potomac River upstream from Washington, D.C. The diversity of compounds detected indicate a variety of different sources and uses (including wastewater discharge, industrial, agricultural, domestic, and others) and different pathways (including treated wastewater outfalls located upstream, overland runoff, and ground-water discharge) to drinking-water supplies. Seven compounds were detected year-round in source-water intake samples, including selected herbicide compounds commonly used in the Potomac River Basin and in other agricultural areas across the United States. Two-thirds of the 26 compounds detected most commonly in source water (in at least 20 percent of the samples) also were detected most commonly in finished water (after treatment but prior to distribution). Concentrations for all detected compounds in source and finished water generally were less than 0.1 microgram per liter and always less than human-health benchmarks, which are available for about one-half of the detected compounds. On the basis of this screening-level assessment, adverse effects to human health are expected to be negligible (subject to limitations of available human-health benchmarks).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Gregory C. Delzer, Ph.D.

##### Deputy Director for Science 

Dakota Water Science Center

gcdelzer@usgs.gov

605-394-3230

## Related Content

#### Gregory C. Delzer, Ph.D.

##### Deputy Director for Science 

Dakota Water Science Center

gcdelzer@usgs.gov

605-394-3230

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Dakota Water Science Center- Rapid City

1608 Mountain ViewRapid City, SD57702United States

(605) 394-3200

(605) 355-4523

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Potomac River
                  - Maryland
                  -  Virginia

View All **
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20668 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY LEE PULLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-86-1

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Rodney Lee Pullins, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Pullins has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.