alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: DAMARIS TRAVIESO CASE NUMBER: 20-17395-LMI

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for October 6, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the October 6, 2020

hearing were due as of September 18, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to 

"re-sending" documents)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 11/3:

Due on or before 5pm on 10/16: 1) bank stmts #0622 (6/1-7/6) & #0614 (7/1-7/6); 2) issue with objection to 

poc 20

Case 20-17395-LMI Doc 29 Filed 10/01/20 Page 1 of 1
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

59386

Vol. 62, No. 212

Monday, November 3, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 600

[Docket No. 970829214–7214–01;I.D.

082097B]

RIN 0648–AJ76

Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;

Observer Health and Safety

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–28440,

beginning on page 55774, in the issue of

Tuesday, October 28, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 55775, in the second column,

in the last line, ‘‘49464’’ should read

‘‘49463’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 600 and 606

[Docket No. 97N-0242]

Biological Products; Reporting of

Errors and Accidents in Manufacturing

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–25129

beginning on page 49642, in the issue of

Tuesday, September 23, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 49642, in the second column,

in the DATES section, in the last line,

‘‘March 23, 1998.’’ should read ‘‘180

days after its date of publication in the

Federal Register.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards Administration

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

Correction

In notice document 97–28258,

beginning on page 55428, in the issue of

Friday, October 24, 1997 make the

following corrections:

On page 55429, in the first column:

1. Under the heading OMB Number,

‘‘15-0037’’ should read ‘‘1215-0037’’.

2. Above the signature line, ‘‘Dated:

October 2, 1997’’ should read ‘‘Dated:

October 20, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316]

Indiana Michigan Power Company;

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of

Amendment to Facility Operating

License, Proposed No Significant

Hazards Consideration Determination

and Opportunity for a Hearing

Correction

In notice document 97–28003,

beginning on page 54861, in the issue of

Wednesday, October 22, 1997 make the

following correction:

On page 54863, in the second column,

in the second full paragraph, in the

third line ‘‘October 8, 1997’’ should read

‘‘September 19, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 25 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 25 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 25 Filed 03/11/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 20-23376-EPK Doc 25 Filed 03/11/21 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

(Section 906of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection withthe filing by Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (the “Company”) of the AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 (the “Report”),each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Evrett W. Benton                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Evrett W. Benton                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Bruce J. Mackey Jr.               |   |
|   | Bruce J. Mackey Jr.                   |
|   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 43 Filed 08/20/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 43 Filed 08/20/20 Page 2 of 2
Order filed October 29, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00726-CV

____________

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A, Appellant

V.

GEOFFREY A. GROFF, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1097237

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 19, 2019. To date, the 

filing fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by 

statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before November 13, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 

appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: 

 Case No. 20-16595-AJC 

ASTOR EB-5, LLC, 

 Chapter 7 

 Debtor. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

SOHO BOUTIQUE ASTOR, LLC TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS 

This matter came before the Court for hearing on February 2, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. (the 

“Hearing”) upon the Motion to Compel SOHO Boutique Astor, LLC (“Motion”) [ECF No. 152] 

filed by Drew Dillworth (the “Trustee”), the trustee for the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of Astor 

EB-5, LLC (the “Debtor”). The Court, having considered (i) the Motion, (ii) the record, and (iii) 

the presentations of counsel for the Trustee at the Hearing, finds it appropriate, for the reasons 

set forth on the record at the Hearing, to grant the relief requested in the Motion as set forth 

below. Therefore, it is – 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 4, 2022.

Case 20-16595-AJC Doc 156 Filed 02/04/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

#10267342 v1 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. SOHO Boutique Astor, LLC shall produce responsive documents to the Trustee 

by no later than February 16, 2022. 

3. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order, and if 

appropriate, enter sanctions pursuant to Rule 37, Fed. R. Civ. P., as incorporated here by 

Bankruptcy Rule 7037, Fed. R. Bankr. P. Failure to comply with this Order may result in further 

orders of the Court finding SOHO Boutique Astor, LLC in contempt of Court. 

### 

Submitted by: 

Eric J. Silver 

Florida Bar No. 057262 

esilver@stearnsweaver.com

STEARNS WEAVER MILLER 

WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. 

Museum Tower Building, Suite 2200 

150 West Flagler Street 

Miami, Florida 33130 

Telephone: (305) 789-3200 

Facsimile: (305) 789-3395 

Counsel for Trustee Mukamal 

(Attorney Silver is directed to serve this Order upon all non-registered users or registered users 

who have yet to appear electronically in this case and file a conforming Certificate of Service.) 

Case 20-16595-AJC Doc 156 Filed 02/04/22 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Plant responses, climate pivot points, and trade-offs in water-limited ecosystems      

      September 24, 2013    

Plant species in dryland ecosystems are limited by water availability and may be vulnerable to increases in aridity. Methods are needed to monitor and assess the rate of change in plant abundance and composition in relation to climate, understand the potential for degradation in dryland ecosystems, and forecast future changes in plant species assemblages. I employ nearly a century of vegetation monitoring data from three North American deserts to demonstrate an approach to determine plant species responses to climate and critical points over a range of climatic conditions at which plant species shift from increases to decreases in abundance (climate pivot points). I assess these metrics from a site to regional scale and highlight how these indicators of plant performance can be modified by the physical and biotic environment. For example, shrubs were more responsive to drought and high temperatures on shallow soils with limited capacity to store water and fine-textured soils with slow percolation rates, whereas perennial grasses were more responsive to precipitation in sparse shrublands than in relatively dense grasslands and shrublands, where competition for water is likely more intense. The responses and associated climate pivot points of plant species aligned with their lifespan and structural characteristics, and the relationship between responses and climate pivot points provides evidence of the trade-off between the capacity of a plant species to increase in abundance when water is available and its drought resistance.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Seth Munson, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

smunson@usgs.gov

928-556-7301

## Related Content

#### Seth Munson, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

smunson@usgs.gov

928-556-7301

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Chihuahuan Desert;Colorado Plateau;Sonoran Desert
                  - Arizona;New Mexico;Texas;Utah
                  - Arizona
                  - new mexico
                  - texas
                  - Utah
                  - chihuahuan desert
                  - Colorado Plateau
                  - sonoran desert

View All **
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT1ON AGENCY REGION
IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 941O539Q1 Mr. Richard W. Corey Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box2815 Sacramento, California 95812 On January 2,2012. the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions
tothe California State Implementation Plan.We have reviewed materials submitted with the folLowing negative declaration and found that itfulfills the completeness criteria in40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51, Appendix V. APCD/AQMD

r Negative Declaration Sacramento Metropolitan Coating Operations
At Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations This addresses all revisions
in this submittal.
Inthe coming monthswewill review the complete revisions for action pursuant
toCleanAir Act section 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia 0. Allen at (415) 947-41 20. cc: Mr. Larry Greene, APCO Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division Sincerely, FEB
2

1 2012 DearMr. Corey: Deborah Jordan Director, Air L)ivision
Pritued iu [:(ed
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Petty Officer 
           1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS CALEB A. NELSON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Petty Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Petty 
Officer 1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 5720 South 142nd Street in Omaha, Nebraska, as the ``Petty Officer 
           1st Class Caleb A. Nelson Post Office Building''.
```
Stacey Renee MCRAE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Records of wells and water levels from the statewide observation-well network in Montana from October 1985 through October 1992      

      January 1, 1995    

View Document

A statewide observation-well network was developed in Montana in 1947 by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies to provide a long-term record of water levels in selected wells. This report summarized well records and water levels for the network and shows the locations of the wells. Data for 360 wells are tabulated in this report, generally for the period 1985-92. The well records include altitude of land surface, principal aquifer, year of construction, depth of well, primary use of site, primary use of water, casing type,casing depth, casing diameter, top of and bottom of open interval, year water-level data collection began, frequency of water-level data collection, year water-quality data collection began, type of analysis, year water-quality parameter measured, analyzing agency, and type of logs available. The water-level data include date of measurement, water level, method of measurement, and site status. Data for wells equipped with recorders include well number, site identification, name of source agency, well depth, principal aquifer, altitude of land surface, and water level. Well location is shown on a map at a scale of 1:1,000,000.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Montana

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           To manage inland fisheries is to manage at the social-ecological watershed scale      

      August 5, 2016    

Approaches to managing inland fisheries vary between systems and regions but are often based on large-scale marine fisheries principles and thus limited and outdated. Rarely do they adopt holistic approaches that consider the complex interplay among humans, fish, and the environment. We argue that there is an urgent need for a shift in inland fisheries management towards holistic and transdisciplinary approaches that embrace the principles of social-ecological systems at the watershed scale. The interconnectedness of inland fisheries with their associated watershed (biotic, abiotic, and humans) make them extremely complex and challenging to manage and protect. For this reason, the watershed is a logical management unit. To assist management at this scale, we propose a framework that integrates disparate concepts and management paradigms to facilitate inland fisheries management and sustainability. We contend that inland fisheries need to be managed as social-ecological watershed system (SEWS). The framework supports watershed-scale and transboundary governance to manage inland fisheries, and transdisciplinary projects and teams to ensure relevant and applicable monitoring and research. We discuss concepts of social-ecological feedback and interactions of multiple stressors and factors within/between the social-ecological systems. Moreover, we emphasize that management, monitoring, and research on inland fisheries at the watershed scale are needed to ensure long-term sustainable and resilient fisheries.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Abigail J. Lynch, Ph.D.

##### Research Fish Biologist, National CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

ajlynch@usgs.gov

703-648-4097

#### T. Douglas Beard, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Senior Administrator, National CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

dbeard@usgs.gov

571-265-4623

## Related Content

#### Abigail J. Lynch, Ph.D.

##### Research Fish Biologist, National CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

ajlynch@usgs.gov

703-648-4097

#### T. Douglas Beard, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Senior Administrator, National CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

dbeard@usgs.gov

571-265-4623

### Contact

####               National Climate Adaptation Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveMS 516Reston, VA20192United States

casc@usgs.gov

(703) 648-5801

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Climate
                  - Ecosystems

View All **
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40036

Summary Calendar

RICKEY GENE SPICER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LELAND HEUSZEL, Individually and in his official capacity as

Assistant Warden; RICHARD HENRY, Individually and in his official

capacity as Field Correctional Officer; ERIC COLLIER,

Individually and in his official capacity as Building

Correctional Officer; NEAL ROY SMITH, Individually and in his

official capacity as Field Sergeant; CLYDE COOPER, Individually

and in his official capacity as Field Lieutenant; JAMES WARREN,

Individually and inn his official capacity as Disciplinary

Captain; SHENANE BOSTON, Individually and in her official

capacity as Disciplinary Counsel; DAVID FORREST, Individually and

in his official capacity as Building Major; KENT RAMSEY,

Individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director;

J.M. COCKERHAM, Individually and in his official capacity as

Deputy Director,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the

Eastern District of Texas

(9:96-CV-373)

July 28, 1997

Before JOHNSON, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rickey Gene Spicer (#5763346), a state prisoner, has appealed
2

the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint as

frivolous. In his complaint Spicer contends that the defendants

retaliated against him by filing false disciplinary charges and

that he was denied his right of procedural due process in

connection with prison disciplinary proceedings. 

A complaint filed in forma pauperis “may be dismissed as

frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact.” Eason v.

Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I).

This court reviews dismissals as frivolous for abuse of discretion.

See Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993). In the

present case, Spicer’s allegations of retaliation are insufficient

to raise a constitutional issue. See Whittington v. Lynaugh, 842

F.2d 818, 819-21 (5th Cir. 1988), Woods v. Smith, 60 F.3d 1161,

1166 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 800 (1996).

Furthermore, Spicer’s due process claims were properly dismissed

under the rule in Sandin v. Conner, 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995).

See Luken v. Scott, 71 F.3d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied,

116 S. Ct. 1690 (1996). Therefore, we hold that the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as

frivolous. See Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir. 1993).

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5th CIR. R.

42.2. We caution Spicer that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions Spicer is further cautioned to review any pending appeals
3

to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED, SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 202 (Thursday, October 17, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-21017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 200

[Docket No. FR-3966-F-01]
RIN 2502-AG58


Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner; Streamlining of the FHA Single Family Housing, and 
Multifamily Housing and Health Care Facility Mortgage Insurance 
Programs Regulations

Correction

    In rule document 96-7488 beginning on page 14396 in the issue of 
Monday, April 1, 1996, make the following corrections:


Sec. 200.1302  [Correctly Added]

    On page 14404, in the third column, amendatory instruction 7 
inadvertently revised Sec. 200.1301. Amendatory instruction 7 and the 
heading for Sec. 200.1301 should read as follows:
    7. In subpart W, a new Sec. 200.1302 is added to read as follows:


Sec. 200.1302  Additional Expiring Programs--Savings Clause.

* * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D