alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of American Development &
Investment Fund, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"),I, Robert Hipple, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Hipple
--------------------------------------
Robert Hipple
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2007
Exhibit 10.1

 

Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.
 2012 Annual Bonus Plan

 

Purpose

 

The purpose of this Plan is to increase the intrinsic business value of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. and its operating subsidiaries (the “Company”) by aligning employee performance with the interests of the Company’s owners. All active full-time employees of the Company in good standing shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.

 

Performance Targets

 

The Plan shall be tied to a calendar year performance cycle consistent with the Company’s fiscal year. Annual bonus pool targets for categories of employees and an overall Company performance target under the Plan shall be set by the Company’s Compensation and Nominating Committee (the “Committee”).  At the conclusion of the calendar year, the Committee shall judge Company performance against the bonus pool targets when determining the final size of the bonus pools and the level of payout for each employee. At lower levels of the Company employee individual performance is also considered. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with the Committee, shall then recommend the distribution of the pool to individual Plan participants who are non-executive officers of the Company. The Committee shall approve any payments to the Company’s executive officers.

 

Bonus Pool Targets

 

For the 2012 calendar year, the annual bonus pool targets for the Company’s officers and all remaining Company staff shall be the following percentages of eligible salaries:

 

	
Performance
    	
 
    	
Group A
    	
 
    	
Group B
    	
 
    	
Group C-G
    	
 
    
	
Minimum
    	
 
    	
0
    	
%
    	
0
    	
%
    	
0
    	
%
    
	
On Target
    	
 
    	
100
    	
%
    	
75
    	
%
    	
10-50
    	
%
    
	
Superior
    	
 
    	
200
    	
%
    	
150
    	
%
    	
10-100
    	
%
    


 

Eligible salaries for all officers and staff shall be equivalent to the 2012 base salaries of Plan participants (as in effect on April 1, 2012), pro-rated in the case of any officer or staff member actively employed by the Company for less than the entire 2012 calendar year.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5031 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5031

   To enhance Federal response and preparedness with respect to Zika 
                                 virus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2016

    Mr. Curbelo of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
 the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To enhance Federal response and preparedness with respect to Zika 
                                 virus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Zika Eradication and Good Government 
Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR RESPONSE AND PREPAREDNESS WITH RESPECT 
              TO ZIKA VIRUS.

    (a) Authorization.--In addition to the purposes otherwise provided 
for Ebola funds made available in the Consolidated and Further 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Public Law 113-235), such funds 
may also be used for Zika virus response and preparedness. Until such 
funds have been fully obligated, no additional funds are authorized to 
be appropriated or otherwise made available for Zika virus response and 
preparedness.
    (b) Ebola Funds Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``Ebola funds'' means amounts made available to any Department or 
agency for Ebola response and preparedness.

SEC. 3. SHARING OF BEST PRACTICES BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES RESPONSIBLE FOR 
              INSECT-BOURNE INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESPONSE AND 
              PREPAREDNESS.

    The President shall require all Federal officials and employees 
responsible for insect-bourne infectious disease response and 
preparedness, including efforts to eradicate such disease, to cooperate 
by sharing best practices.

SEC. 4. REPORT ON FEDERAL RESPONSE AND PREPAREDNESS WITH RESPECT TO 
              ZIKA VIRUS.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, not 
less than every 30 days thereafter until September 30, 2016, and not 
less than every 180 days thereafter, the President shall submit a 
report to the Congress on the programs and activities of the Federal 
Government for Zika virus response and preparedness, including with 
respect to--
            (1) the effectiveness of such programs and activities; and
            (2) the extent to which funds have been obligated and 
        expended pursuant to section 2.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Interaction of subsurface brines with oxygenated meteoric water, Ray Point Uranium District, South Texas, USA      

      January 15, 1983    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Martin Goldhaber

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis

mgold@usgs.gov

303-236-1521

####             Richard Wanty (Former Employee)          

##### Research Chemist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

## Related Content

#### Martin Goldhaber

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis

mgold@usgs.gov

303-236-1521

####             Richard Wanty (Former Employee)          

##### Research Chemist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - texas

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3514 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3514

  To repeal a limitation on annual payments under the Surface Mining 
                  Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2012

 Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Casey, and 
 Mr. Manchin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal a limitation on annual payments under the Surface Mining 
                  Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS FROM THE ABANDONED MINE 
              RECLAMATION FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 411(h) of the Surface Mining Control and 
Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1240a(h)) is amended by striking 
paragraph (5).
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) takes effect on July 6, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the annual report of Findex.com, Inc. (the “company”) on Form
      10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Kirk R.
      Rowland, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
      that:





(1)
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report.





In
      Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
      this 28th day of
      September, 2005.








By
                /s/ Kirk R. RowlandKirk
                R. RowlandChief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDIANET GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James Dyas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ James Dyas
--------------
James Dyas
Principal Financial Officer

August 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENTS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13(a)-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Veolia Environnement, a French société anonyme (the Company), does hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:
  April 16, 2009

|By: | /s/ Henri Proglio                    | 
|--- | ------------------------------------ | 
|    | Henri Proglio                        | 
|    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 





Dated:
  April 16, 2009

|By: | /s/ Thomas Piquemal                           | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Thomas Piquemal                               | 
|    | Executive Vice President in charge of finance | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veolia Environnement and will be retained by Veolia Environnement and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Plan t Assemblag e T ox icity Inde x

Assessmen t Pe riod Selection Issues

– Cosm Dat ag/LAtrazine)



# 1000 10000

**1**



# Te st Duration (day s) 5 20 50 200

10 100Average(g/LAtrazine)



# 1 10 100

# Plan t Assemblag e T ox icity Inde x

Assessmen t Pe riod Selection Issues

– Cosm Dat ag/LAtrazine)



# 1000 10000

**2**



# Te st Duration (day s) 5 20 50 200

10 100Average(g/LAtrazine)



# 1 10 100

# Plan t Assemblag e T ox icity Inde x

Assessmen t Pe riod Selection Issues

– Cosm Dat ag/LAtrazine)



# 1000 10000

**3**



# Te st Duration (day s) 5 20 50 200

10 100Average(g/LAtrazine)



# 1 10 100
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           A Three Component Model to Estimate Sensible Heat Flux Over Sparse Shrubs in Nevada      

      January 1, 1997    

It is now recognized that accurate partitioning of available energy into sensible and latent heat flux is crucial to understanding surface-atmosphere interactions. This issue is more complicated in arid and semi-arid regions where the relative contribution to surface fluxes from the soil and vegetation may vary significantly throughout the day and throughout the season. The objective of this paper is to present a three-component model to estimate sensible heat flux over heterogeneous surfaces. The surface was represented with two adjacent compartments. The first compartment is made up of two components, shrubs and shaded soil; the second compartment consists of bare, unshaded soil. Data collected at two different sites in Nevada during the summers of 1991 and 1992 were used to evaluate model performance. The results show that the present model is sufficiently general to yield satisfactory results for both sites.

## Citation Information
# Howden Cooling Fans

RETROFIT OF A LARGE COOLING TOWER IN COMBINATION WITH A SIGNIFICANT NOISE REDUCTIONCaseStudy

Coolin g Tower at OMV, Vienna



### OMV has a large refinery outside the Austrian capital of Vienna. Typically large coolin g towers are a key part of the installations at such a plant. After 18 years of operation, cooling tower number 3 required replacement of the rota ting equipment, i.e. the fans and drive trains. In addition, OMV has a strict environmental impact policy that revamps must lead to substantial noise reduction.

These two items, the need to retrofit and the overall policy for noise reduction at this site have been the starting point for the re v amping project on coolingtower number 3, which has 24 cells with 22 ft. diameter f ans. At first, a comparative performance and sound test was done between a super quiet fan and a classic straight bladed fan. Measurements by an independent German acoustic consultant were made before and after the revamp. The results from this test showed the difference in noise level of 15 dB(A) between the super quiet f an and the classic straight bladed f an, and pro v ed the potential to reduce noise in the existing cooling towers when using the super quiet fan. For OMV it justified the required in v estment and the decision to proceed.



### CS 00/01 Nov 2003 Figure 1 The super quiet SX-fans that were used for this revamp are shown in figure 1.

# Cooling Tower Howden Cooling Fans

t able 1: verification t est results N oise Data (LwA) in dB(A)
Before After
Air inlet, down at the tower LwA 110 110
Air outlet, fan stack LwA 115 100

Drive train LwA 110 94

T otal of cooling tower LwA 117.7 110.9

At the nearest housing areas SPL 49.1 39.2CaseStudy The SX-fans are quiet for the following two main

reasons:
The higher blade co v erage in the cross sectional area (solidity) of the SX-f an enables the air flow to be archie v ed at a lo wer speed than a con v entional fan type.The special blade shape with swept forward leading and trailing edges generates less noise than

a con v entional fan type.

As a result SX-fans archieve a given air flow generating 10 to 15 dB(A) less nouse, when compared to classic straight blade fans or, the other way round, the SX-fan can provide substantially more air flow for a given noise level. When using SX-fans in low noise applications special attention has to be paid to the drive train, to ensure that the gain on aerodynamic noise reduction is not w asted by noise generated by the E-motor and/or gearbox.

It is obvious that when standing beside a counter flow cooling tower the splashing water is the dominant noise source. However, measurements by an acoustic consultant pro v ed that for the environmental noise at the nearby housing area, the fan impeller and drive train were the dominant noise source and that they would benefit from this noise reduction. A summary of the archieved noise reduction is given in table 1.

Howden Cooling Fans Lansinkesweg 4 P.O. Box 975 7550 AZ Hengelo, The Netherlands Tel: +31 74 255 6000 Fax: +31 74 255 6060 Web: www.howdencoolingfans.com
----

EXHIBIT 32.1

|   | (a) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March      10, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ William J. Loughman                             |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |   | William J. Loughman                                 |   |
|                           |   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                    |   |
|                           |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |   |

----
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

26482

Vol. 60, No. 95

Wednesday, May 17, 1995

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ADMINISTRATION

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty

Order, Finding, or Suspended

Investigation; Opportunity to Request

Administrative Review

Correction

In notice document 95–11531

beginning on page 24831 in the issue of

Wednesday, May 10, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 24831, under the heading

‘‘Antidumping Duty Proceedings’’, in

the first listing for ‘‘Taiwan’’ in the

table, ‘‘(A-583-507)’’ should read ‘‘(A583-008)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs

Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;

Notice of Delays in Processing of

Exemption Applications

Correction

In notice document 95–11616

beginning on page 25260 in the issue of

Thursday, May 11, 1994, make the

following corrections:

On page 25261, in the table, in the

first column, Application numbers

‘‘10012-N’’, ‘‘10022-N’’ and ‘‘10098-N’’

should read ‘‘11012-N’’, ‘11022-N’’ and

‘‘11098-N’’ respectively.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 19, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 58924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11119]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 224 / Tuesday, November 19, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 58924]]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-37890; File Nos. SR-Amex-96-37, SR-NYSE-96-30, and SR-
Phlx-96-43]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Changes by the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc., New York Stock Exchange, Inc., and Philadelphia 
Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to an Extension of Certain Market-Wide 
Circuit Breaker Provisions

Correction

    In notice document 96-28385 beginning on page 56983 in the issue of 
Tuesday, November 5, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 56985, in the third column, above the FR Doc. line, the 
signature was omitted and should read as set forth below:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5026 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5026

      To direct the President to develop and submit to Congress a 
  comprehensive strategy to combat cybercrime, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2016

   Mr. Ross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To direct the President to develop and submit to Congress a 
  comprehensive strategy to combat cybercrime, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESIDENTIAL STRATEGY TO COMBAT CYBERCRIME.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the President shall submit to Congress a comprehensive strategy to 
combat cybercrime, which shall include the following:
            (1) A recommendation for a definition of cybercrime to be 
        used by the Federal Government.
            (2) A recommendation and a plan for which Federal agency 
        should take the lead role in investigating and combating 
        cybercrime.
            (3) A review of the strategy on combating cybercrime of 
        each Federal agency engaged in combating cybercrime as of the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (4) A review of the efforts to combat cybercrime of the 
        governments of other countries, as determined appropriate by 
        the President.
            (5) A plan for how the Federal Government should work with 
        State governments and with the governments of other countries 
        to combat cybercrime.
            (6) A description of the threats that cybercrime poses to 
        individuals, businesses, and governments, and recommendations 
        for protecting against such threats.
                                 <all>
```
Ernest STATEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.