11389114-1 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

IN RE: Chapter 11 Case 

CINEMEX HOLDINGS USA, INC., Case No.: 20-14696-LMI 

Debtor. 

______________________________________________/

EX PARTE MOTION OF GUC CLAIMS TRUST FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

FURTHER EXTENDING THE PERIOD WITHIN WHICH THE GUC CLAIMS TRUST 

MAY OBJECT TO GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS 

The GUC Claims Trust files this Ex Parte Motion of GUC Claims Trust for Entry of an 

Order Further Extending the Period Within Which the GUC Claims Trust May Object to General 

Unsecured Claims (the “Motion”) pursuant to section 105(a) of Title 11 of the United States Code 

(the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 9006 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the 

“Bankruptcy Rules”), and Local Rule 3007-1 of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Southern District of Florida (“LBR”), for the entry of an order substantially in the form attached 

hereto as Exhibit A further extending the period within which the GUC Claims Trust may object 

to Claims (as defined in the Plan, defined below) filed against the Debtors’ estates by one hundred 

eighty (180) days. In support of this Motion, the GUC Claims Trust respectfully represents as 

follows: 

Background 

1. On April 25, 2020, and April 26, 2020, Cinemex USA Real Estate Holdings, Inc., 

and two of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) each filed a petition for relief under Chapter 

11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of 

Florida (the “Bankruptcy Court”). 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 14
11389114-1 

2 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

2. On November 25, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Findings of Fact, 

Conclusions of Law and Order Confirming Third Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of 

Reorganization of Cinemex USA Real Estate Holdings, Inc., Cinemex Holdings USA, Inc. and CB 

Theater Experience LLC [Docket No. 936] (the “Confirmation Order”). Pursuant to the 

Confirmation Order, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Third Amended Joint Plan of 

Reorganization of Cinemex USA Real Estate Holdings, Inc., Cinemex Holdings USA, Inc. and CB 

Theater Experience LLC [Docket No. 772] (the “Plan”). On December 18, 2020, the Effective 

Date of the Plan occurred [Docket No. 973]. 

3. Upon the Effective Date of the Plan, the GUC Claims Trust was created. Advisory 

Trust Group, LLC, was appointed the GUC Claims Trustee of the GUC Claims Trust (the “GUC 

Claims Trustee”). 

4. The GUC Claims Trust is responsible for, among other things, “administer[ing] the 

GUC Claims Trust Assets and will be the Estates’ representative with respect to the settlement, 

release, allowance, disallowance, or compromise of GUC Claims in accordance with the Plan and 

the Bankruptcy Code.” See Plan at Article IV.V. 

Claims Administration 

5. On April 29, 2020, the Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case [Docket No. 15] 

established July 6, 2020 (the “General Claims Bar Date”), as the deadline for all persons and 

entities asserting a Claim (as defined in section 101(5) of the Bankruptcy Code) against the Debtors 

that arose on or prior to the Petition Date, including claims pursuant to section 503(b)(9) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, other than those of governmental units. 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 14
11389114-1 

3 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

6. On June 11, 2020, each of the Debtors filed its respective schedules of assets and 

liabilities (as amended from time to time, the “Schedules”) pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1007. On 

August 13, 2020, and October 16, 2020, the Debtors filed amended Schedules. 

7. As of the filing of this Motion, approximately 300 general unsecured claims have 

been filed in these cases in the aggregate approximate amount of $1.3 billion. 

8. The Plan provides that objections to claims (the “Claims Objection Deadline”) must 

be filed by the later of: (a) the date that is 180 days after the Effective Date, i.e., June 16, 2021; 

and (b) such other date as may be fixed by the Bankruptcy Court, after notice and hearing, upon a 

motion filed before the expiration of such deadline. Plan, Art. I.A.28; VII.D. 

9. On May 10, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed an Ex Parte Motion to (I) Add Claim 

Objection Categories to Omnibus Objections; and (II) to Waive Requirements of Local Rule 3007-

1(C) that Objection be Limited to Five Claims per Pleading Filed by Other Professional GUC 

Claims Trust [Docket No. 39] (the “Claim Objection Procedures Motion”). On May 12, 2021, the 

Court entered an order approving the Claim Objection Procedures Motion [Docket No. 41]. 

10. On May 18, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed the GUC Claims Trust’s First 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Duplicative Claims) [Docket No. 114] in which it objected to eight 

duplicate claims. 

11. On May 18, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed the GUC Claims Trust’s Second 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Duplicative Claims Against Multiple Debtors) [Docket No. 115] in 

which it objected to eight duplicate claims. 

12. On May 18, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed the GUC Claims Trust’s Third 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Amended and Superseded Claims) [Docket No. 116] in which it 

objected to 16 claims. 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 3 of 14
11389114-1 

4 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

13. On May 28, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed Ex Parte Motion of GUC Claims 

Trust for Entry of an Order Extending the Claims Objection Deadline (the “First Extension 

Motion”) [Docket No. 164], seeking an initial extension of the Claims Objection Deadline by 180 

days, to December 13, 2021. By order entered June 1, 2021 [Docket No. 165], the Bankruptcy 

Court granted the First Extension Motion. 

14. On June 28, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed the GUC Claims Trust’s Fourth 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Assumed/Cured Claims) [Docket 182] in which it objected to 129 

claims. 

15. On September 20, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed the GUC Claims Trust’s Fifth 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Assumed Claims; Duplicate Claim; Insufficient Documentation 

Claim) [Docket No. 240] in which it objected to seven claims. 

16. On November 5, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed Ex Parte Motion of GUC 

Claims Trust for Entry of an Order Further Extending the Claims Objection Deadline (the “Second 

Extension Motion”) [Docket No. 293], seeking a further extension of the Claims Objection 

Deadline by 180 days, to June 10, 2022. By order entered November 10, 2021 [Docket No. 303], 

the Bankruptcy Court granted the Second Extension Motion. 

17. On November 23, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed GUC Claims Trust’s Sixth 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Assumed Claim; Duplicate Claim; Lacks Sufficient Documentation 

Claim) [Docket No. 319] in which it objected to three claims. 

18. On November 23, 2021, the GUC Claims Trust filed GUC Claims Trust’s Seventh 

Omnibus Objection to Claims (Assumed Claim; Duplicate Claim; Lacks Sufficient Documentation 

Claim) [Docket No. 320] in which it objected to 153 claims. 

Jurisdiction 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 4 of 14
11389114-1 

5 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

19. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. 

This matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). 

20. Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. 

Relief Requested 

21. The current Claims Objection Deadline is June 10, 2022. By this Motion and 

pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9006(b)(1) and LBR 3007-1(c), the GUC Claims Trust seeks a further 

extension of the Claims Objection Deadline for another one hundred eighty (180) days through 

and including the later of: (a) December 7, 2022, or (b) one hundred eighty (180) days following 

the date that a proof of Claim is filed or amended or a Claim is otherwise asserted or amended in 

writing by or on behalf of a holder of such Claim. 

22. The GUC Claims Trust further requests that the order approving this Motion be 

without prejudice to the rights of the GUC Claims Trust to seek further extension or extensions of 

the Claims Objection Deadline. 

Basis for Relief 

23. There are approximately 300 general unsecured proofs of claim pending that 

require review and analysis. Since the Effective Date, the GUC Claims Trust has retained 

professionals, taken steps to establish its bank account, coordinated information requests of the 

Debtors, has begun its preliminary review and investigation of assets and disposition of property, 

and has commenced an analysis of the filed claims. In addition, the GUC Claims Trust has begun 

objecting to claims, including as reflected in the seven omnibus objections referenced above, and 

has begun negotiating settlements of claims where possible. However, the GUC Claims Trust 

requires additional time to review and determine which claims are valid and which should be 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 5 of 14
11389114-1 

6 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

objected to, including but not limited to in light of payments made during the case, litigation that 

may be commenced, and resolutions that may be achieved without need for formal objections. 

24. Accordingly, the GUC Claims Trust seeks additional time to review and analyze 

the remaining unresolved claims in order to determine whether objections (or other actions) are 

appropriate. The GUC Claims Trust submits that extending the Claims Objection Deadline is in 

the best interests of all stakeholders. The extension sought will afford the GUC Claims Trust and 

its respective management and professionals an opportunity to make more fully informed decisions 

concerning the resolution of pending claims in the interests of ensuring ratable distributions among 

and maximizing value for legitimate creditors. 

25. Furthermore, extension of the Claims Objection Deadline is not sought coercively 

for purposes of delay, nor will it affect or prejudice any claimant’s substantive defense(s) to any 

objection. Rather, the extension is intended to promote the efficient administration of these cases 

and the claims allowance process. Absent the requested extension of the Claims Objection 

Deadline, the GUC Claims Trust will either be precluded from challenging invalid, misclassified, 

and/or overstated claims, or it will be forced to file hastily prepared protective objections without 

the benefit of a full review and analysis and incur the cost of doing so. 

26. For the reasons set forth above, the GUC Claims Trust submits that further 

extending the Claims Objection Deadline through and including the later of: (a) December 7, 2022, 

or (b) one hundred eighty (180) days following the date that a proof of Claim is filed or amended 

or a Claim is otherwise asserted or amended in writing by or on behalf of a holder of such Claim 

is necessary, prudent, and in the best interests of all stakeholders. This is the third requested 

extension of the Claims Objection Deadline. 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 6 of 14
11389114-1 

7 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

Reservation of Rights 

27. The GUC Claims Trust hereby reserves the right to seek further extension or 

extensions of the Claims Objection Deadline. 

Notice 

28. Notice of this Motion has been provided to the following parties, or their counsel, 

if known: (a) the Office of the United States Trustee; and (b) all parties that have filed a renewed 

request for service of papers under Bankruptcy Rule 2002 pursuant to the Effective Date Notice. 

The GUC Claims Trust respectfully submits that such notice is sufficient under the circumstances. 

WHEREFORE, the GUC Claims Trust respectfully requests that the Court enter the 

Proposed Order, attached hereto as Exhibit A, extending the Claims Objection Deadline as 

requested herein, and such other and further relief as is just and proper. 

Dated: May 10, 2022 BERGER SINGERMAN LLP 

313 N. Monroe Street, Suite 301 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

Tel: (850) 561-3010; Fax: (850) 561-3013 

By: /s/ Brian G. Rich 

Brian G. Rich 

 Florida Bar No. 38229 

brich@bergersingerman.com 

-andPACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 

Robert J. Feinstein (admitted pro hac vice) 

Bradford J. Sandler (admitted pro hac vice) 

Cia H. Mackle (FBN 26471) 

780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor 

New York, NY 10017-2024 

Tel: (212) 561-7700; Fax: (212) 561-7777 

Email: rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com 

 bsandler@pszjlaw.com 

 cmackle@pszjlaw.com 

Counsel for the GUC Claims Trust 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 7 of 14
11389114-1 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on this 

10th day of May, 2022, by electronic transmission through the Court’s CM/ECF system upon 

all parties on the attached CM/ECF Service List. 

By: /s/ Brian G. Rich 

 Brian G. Rich 

 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 8 of 14
11389114-1 

2 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

CM/ECF SERVICE LIST 

• Joaquin J Alemany joaquin.alemany@hklaw.com, jose.casal@hklaw.com 

• Brett M Amron bamron@bastamron.com, 

mdesvergunat@bastamron.com,jmiranda@bastamron.com,kjones@bastamron.com 

• Eric N Assouline ena@assoulineberlowe.com, ah@assoulineberlowe.com 

• Jeffrey P. Bast jbast@bastamron.com, 

jdepina@bastamron.com;kjones@bastamron.com;jmiranda@bastamron.com;mdesvergu

nat@bastamron.com 

• Leyza F. Blanco lblanco@sequorlaw.com, jdiaz@sequorlaw.com 

• Henry H Bolz hbolz@polsinelli.com, 

robrien@polsinelli.com;LBugliaro@polsinelli.com;FLdocketing@polsinelli.com 

• Timothy R Bow timothy.bow@bclplaw.com 

• John C. Brock jbrock@cotneycl.com, cguido@cotneycl.com 

• Thomas M Byrne tombyrne@eversheds-sutherland.com, thomas-byrne2475@ecf.pacerpro.com;nickolebaker@eversheds-sutherland.com 

• Sara L. Chenetz schenetz@perkinscoie.com 

• Shawn M Christianson schristianson@buchalter.com, cmcintire@buchalter.com 

• Andrew S Conway aconway@taubman.com 

• Ryan E Davis rdavis@whww.com, 

thiggens@whww.com;thiggens@ecf.courtdrive.com 

• Sean B Davis sbdavis@winstead.com, mmingo@winstead.com 

• Allison R Day aday@gjb-law.com, hburke@gjb-law.com;gjbecf@gjblaw.com;chopkins@gjb-law.com;jzamora@gjblaw.com;gjbecf@ecf.courtdrive.com;ecastellanos@gjb-law.com;jsardina@gjblaw.com;jsardina@ecfcourtdrive.com 

• Herbert R Donica herb@donicalaw.com 

• Brian M Dougherty bmd@gsrnh.com 

• G Steven Fender steven.fender@fender-law.com, simone@fenderbollingpaiva.com 

• Michael A. Frank pleadings@bkclawmiami.com, 

bkcpleadings@gmail.com;frankmr48583@notify.bestcase.com 

• David L Gay dgay@carltonfields.com, 

cguzman@carltonfields.com;efile@ecf.inforuptcy.com;miaecf@cfdom.net 

• Andrew Goldman andrew.goldman@wilmerhale.com, 

benjamin.loveland@wilmerhale.com;yolande.thompson@wilmerhale.com 

• Eric Goldstein egoldstein@goodwin.com, 

bankruptcy@goodwin.com;bankruptcyparalegal@goodwin.com 

• Michael B Green mgreen@gunster.com, virastorza@gunster.com 

• Andrea S. Hartley andrea.hartley@akerman.com, janet.salinas@akerman.com 

• Timothy Maze Hartley hartley@hartleylaw.net, reid@hartleylaw.net 

• Tyler A Hayden tyler@phlfirm.com, michael@phlfirm.com 

• Nicole Grimal Helmstetter ngh@agentislaw.com, 

marilee.tamesolmedo@bipc.com;tabitha.pellegrene@bipc.com;kimberly.ecker@bipc.co

m 

• Stephan Hornung hornung@lsellp.com 

• Marsha A Houston mhouston@reedsmith.com, hvalencia@reedsmith.com 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 9 of 14
11389114-1 

3 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

• Thomas B. Humphries thumphries@sirote.com 

• John B. Hutton III huttonj@gtlaw.com, 

mialitdock@gtlaw.com;miaecfbky@gtlaw.com;perezan@gtlaw.com;perezan@gtlaw.co

m 

• Andrew Kamensky akamensky@kelleykronenberg.com, 

raldama@kelleykronenberg.com;jsilver@kelleykronenberg.com 

• Harris J. Koroglu hkoroglu@shutts.com, kszolis@shutts.com;bvelapoldi@shutts.com 

• Robert L LeHane kdwbankruptcydepartment@kelleydrye.com 

• Jaime Burton Leggett jleggett@bastamron.com, 

jmiranda@bastamron.com,mdesvergunat@bastamron.com 

• Alexis A Leventhal aleventhal@reedsmith.com, slucas@reedsmith.com 

• John E Lucian lucian@blankrome.com 

• Ilan Markus imarkus@barclaydamon.com, docketing@barclaydamon.com 

• Robert C Meyer meyerrobertc@cs.com, 

rcmpapl@gmail.com;rcmeyer@gmail.com;assistantrcmpa@gmail.com;meyerrr90112@n

otify.bestcase.com 

• Vanessa P Moody vmoody@goulstonstorrs.com 

• Glenn D Moses gmoses@gjb-law.com, gjbecf@gjb-law.com;chopkins@gjblaw.com;vlambdin@gjb-law.com;gjbecf@ecf.courtdrive.com;ecastellanos@gjblaw.com;jsardina@gjb-law.com 

• Patrick M Mosley pmosley@hwhlaw.com, telam@hwhlaw.com 

• Rachel Nanes rachel.nanes@dlapiper.com, 

Diana.delcampo@dlapiper.com;docketingchicago@dlapiper.com;rachel-nanes6543@ecf.pacerpro.com 

• Michael A. Nardella mnardella@nardellalaw.com, 

service@nardellalaw.com;klynch@nardellalaw.com 

• Kevin S Neiman kevin@ksnpc.com 

• Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

• Omni Agent Solutions (Cashman) ccashman@omniagnt.com, 

3606531420@filings.docketbird.com 

• Jimmy D. Parrish jparrish@bakerlaw.com, 

orlbankruptcy@bakerlaw.com;cmartin@bakerlaw.com;egreen@bakerlaw.com 

• Kristen N Pate bk@brookfieldpropertiesretail.com 

• Hampton Peterson legalservices@PBCTax.com 

• Stephen B Porterfield sporterfield@sirote.com 

• Leanne McKnight Prendergast Leanne.Prendergast@fisherbroyles.com, 

l3annemp@gmail.com 

• Anthony Princi anthonyprinci3rd@gmail.com 

• Jordan L Rappaport office@rorlawfirm.com, 1678370420@filings.docketbird.com 

• David A Ray dray@draypa.com, draycmecf@gmail.com;sramirez.dar@gmail.com 

• Ryan C Reinert rreinert@shutts.com, juanitasanchez@shutts.com 

• Edwin G. Rice erice@babc.com, 

ddecker@babc.com;dmills@babc.com;erice@ecf.courtdrive.com 

• Brian G Rich brich@bergersingerman.com, 

efile@bergersingerman.com;efile@ecf.inforuptcy.com 

• Ariel Rodriguez ariel.rodriguez@usdoj.gov 

• David L Rosendorf dlr@kttlaw.com, rcp@kttlaw.com;ycc@kttlaw.com 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 10 of 14
11389114-1 

4 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

• Amelia Toy Rudolph amyrudolph@eversheds-sutherland.com, KatieClark@evershedssutherland.us;amy-rudolph-1418@ecf.pacerpro.com 

• Jay Sakalo jsakalo@bilzin.com, eservice@bilzin.com;lflores@bilzin.com 

• Mark A Salzberg mark.salzberg@squirepb.com, 

shannon.munsell@squirepb.com;FLA_DCKT@squirepb.com;mark-a-salzberg2003@ecf.pacerpro.com;Gregory.davis@squirepb.com 

• Michael D. Seese mseese@seeselaw.com, sseward@seeselaw.com 

• Paul Steven Singerman singerman@bergersingerman.com, 

mdiaz@bergersingerman.com;efile@bergersingerman.com;efile@ecf.inforuptcy.com 

• Jason Slatkin jslatkin@loriumlaw.com, ecf.jslatkin@loriumlaw.com 

• David R. Softness david@softnesslaw.com 

• Scott A Stichter sstichter.ecf@srbp.com 

• Sabrina L Streusand streusand@slollp.com, villa@slollp.com 

• Patricia B Tomasco pattytomasco@quinnemanuel.com, 

barbarahowell@quinnemanuel.com;cristinazuniga@quinnemanuel.com;serafinaconcanno

n@quinnemanuel.com;joannacaytas@quinnemanuel.com;cristinagreen@quinnemanuel.c

om 

• Ronald M Tucker rtucker@simon.com, cmartin@simon.com;bankruptcy@simon.com 

• Jason A. Weber jaw@tblaw.com, aravix@tblaw.com;dbissoondatt@tblaw.com 

• Edmund S Whitson edmund.whitson@arlaw.com, madeline.algarin@arlaw.com 

• Gillian D Williston gillian.williston@troutman.com, 

fslecfintake@troutman.com;ethan.ostroff@troutman.com;richard.hagerty@troutman.com

;carter.nichols@troutman.com;christina.lesko@troutman.com;virginia.flynn@troutman.c

om;matthew.brooks@troutman.com;nathan.deloatch@trou 

• George L. Zinkler gzinkler.ecf@rprslaw.com 

 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 11 of 14
11389114-1 

5 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

EXHIBIT A 

(Proposed Order) 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 12 of 14
11389114-1 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

IN RE: Chapter 11 Case 

CINEMEX USA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, INC, Case No.: 20-14696-LMI 

Debtors. 

______________________________________________/

ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING THE PERIOD WITHIN WHICH THE 

GUC CLAIMS TRUST MAY OBJECT TO CLAIMS 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court, without a hearing, upon GUC Trust’s Motion for 

Entry of an Order Further Extending the Period Within Which the GUC Claims Trust May Object 

to Claims (the “Motion”)1

 [ECF No. ___] filed by the GUC Claims Trust (the “GUC Claims 

Trust”) established in the chapter 11 cases of the above-captioned debtors (collectively, the 

“Debtors”), and it appearing that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the 

Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest; and the Court having jurisdiction 

1

 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion. 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 13 of 14
11389114-1 

 2 

DOCS_LA:337730.7 14219/002 

to consider the Motion and the relief requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334; and 

consideration of the Motion being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue 

being proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 408 and 1409; and it appearing that no other 

or further notice need be provided; and no objections to the Motion having been filed; and after 

due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, 

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein. 

2. The time period within which the GUC Claims Trust may file objections to 

Claims is enlarged and extended through and including the later of: (a) December 7, 2022, or 

(b) one hundred eighty (180) days following the date that a proof of Claim is filed or amended 

or a Claim is otherwise asserted or amended in writing by or on behalf of a holder of such Claim 

(the “Claims Objection Deadline”). 

3. This Order shall be without prejudice to the rights of the GUC Claims Trust to 

seek further extensions of the Claims Objection Deadline. 

4. This Court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the 

provisions of this Order in all respects and further to hear and determine all matters arising from 

the construction and implementation of this Order. 

# # # 

Submitted by: 

Brian G. Rich, Esq. 

Berger Singerman LLP 

313 N. Monroe Street, Suite 301 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

Telephone: (850) 561-3010 

Facsimile: (850) 561-3013 

E-mail: brich@bergersingerman.com 

(Brian G. Rich, Esq. is directed to serve this order upon all non-registered users or registered users who 

have yet to appear electronically in these cases and file a conforming certificate of service.) 

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 434 Filed 05/10/22 Page 14 of 14