alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 20, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 27659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10520]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 27659]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMINSION

17 CFR Parts 1, 15, 16, and 17


Recordkeeping; Reports by Futures Commission Merchants, Clearing 
Members, Foreign Brokers, and Large Traders

Correction

    In rule document 97-11396, beginning on page 24026 in the issue of 
Friday May 2, 1997, make the followinmg corrections:
    1. On page 24031, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 
4., in the second line, ``(1)'' should read ``(l)''.


Sec. 15.00  [Corrected]

    2. On page 24031, in the third column, in Sec. 15.00, the paragraph 
designation ``(1)'' should read ``(l)''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity 
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending August 31, 2013. The 
following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0164.
    Date Filed: August 29, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 19, 2013.
    Description: Application of United Airlines, Inc. requesting a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity and an exemption 
authorizing it to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of 
persons, property, and mail between San Francisco and Chengdu, People's 
Republic of China, beginning on June 11, 2014.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-22373 Filed 9-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 3852

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

45 to 49 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05024936Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 45-49 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:23 PM)
AFS-10-287-E Jul 08 2010

Exemption No. 5533I Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-7980

Mr. Paul W. Railsback Director of Operations Air Transport Association of America, Inc. 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004-1707

Dear Mr. Railsback:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 5533, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 17, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (ATA), for an extension of Exemption No. 5533, as amended. That exemption from § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows ATA member air lines and other similarly situated part 121 operators to permit qualified flight attendants not required by § 121.391(c) to perform duties related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants during aircraft movement on the surface.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATA.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 5533, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 5533, as amended, to October 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 5533, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 5533.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

D01 RBP Final Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 15-May-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

D02 RBP Response to Comments 16-May-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

D03 RBP Final Notice of Permit Issuance 16-May-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

D04 Public Comments Received 16-May-12 Numerous Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

Final Prevention of Signification Deterioration Permit Documents

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso (RBP) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

May 2012
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

A01 RBP Minor Modification Ambient Air Quality Impacts Report 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

A02 RBP PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (English) 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

A03 RBP PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (Spanish) 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

A04 RBP Proposed Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

Proposed Prevention of Signification Deterioration Documents

REGION 9

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso (RBP) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

March 2012
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

B01 Technical Support Document Facts 7-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

B02 Rio Bravo Poso Contact Information 18-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

B03 US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) Discussion 8-Dec-11 Damian Higgins, USFWS Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

E-mail Communications Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

March 2012
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

C01 Minor Modification Request 17-May-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C02 Site Specific Modification Questions 12-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C03 Baseline Actual Calculations 27-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C04 Trial Burn Extension Request 22-Jul-11 Maynard Adams, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C05 Greenhouse Gas Calculations 12-Oct-11 Eric Moller, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C06 Trial Burn Report 7-Nov-11 Catherine Castillo, Rio Bravo Poso Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C07 Application Completeness Determination 24-Feb-11 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, Rio Bravo Poso

Correspondence Material Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Poso Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-06

March 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SmartVideo Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December  31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard
E. Bennett, Jr. , as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of his knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: April 27,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Richard E. Bennett,
      Jr.Richard E. Bennett, Jr.Chief Executive
  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 97-24011 appearing on page 47507 in the issue of 
Tuesday, September 9, 1997 make the following correction:
    On page 47507, in the first column, under TIME AND DATE, in the 
second line, ``September 25, 1997'' should read ``September 15, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 20-17186-AJC Doc 2 Filed 06/30/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-17186-AJC Doc 2 Filed 06/30/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The nitty-gritty forces that shape planetary surfaces      

      June 19, 2023    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars
                  -  Titan

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Oxygen isotopic determinations of sequentially erupted plagioclases in the 1974 magma of Fuego Volcano, Guatemala      

      January 1, 1980    

Plagioclases in the 1974 high-Al basalt from Fuego Volcano have ??O18 values of +6.0 to +8.5 per mil. Meteoric water cannot have played a significant role in Fuego's magma. Large, weakly zone clear phenocrysts had ??O18 values in the accepted mantle range, while patchyzoned and oscillatory-zoned plagioclases inferred to have formed later and shallower levels have slightly heavier oxygen isotopic ratios. ?? 1980 Intern. Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior.

## Citation Information
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 

2 See 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40152

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

RUBEN LEONIDES-JAIMES; JOSE MATILDE NAJERA AGUIRRE;

ANDRES SANTANA-HERRERA; PEDRO BERRUETE-MALDONADO,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(B-96-CR-212-2)

December 22, 1997

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury convicted the defendants/appellants of conspiracy to

transport and the transportation of undocumented aliens within the

United States.2 In this consolidated appeal, the defendants argue

that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support

their respective convictions. We find that the evidence is
 

3 Guzman v. Lensing, 934 F.2d 80, 82 (5th Cir. 1991)

 

4 The defendants appear to have used one of the trucks for the

purpose of conducting counter-surveillance.

2

sufficient to support the convictions. We affirm.

We will not disturb a conviction attacked on the basis of

evidence sufficiency if, viewing the evidence in the light most

favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have

found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable

doubt.3 Among the prosecution’s evidence in this case was the

testimony of Senior Border Patrol Agent Gilberto Perez. Perez

testified that on July 26, 1997, acting on an anonymous tip, he

encountered the defendants in an area notorious for the smuggling

of aliens. The defendants’ appearances matched the descriptions

given to Perez by the anonymous caller. Agents took finger prints

and photographs of the defendants, but released them later that

morning. The following night, electronic sensors alerted the

Border Patrol to possible smuggling of aliens in the area

identified by the anonymous caller the previous night. Perez

proceeded to that location and observed the defendants in two

separate vehicles, at least one of which was also occupied by

illegal aliens.4 Agents found plastic bags containing women’s and

children’s clothing in the bed of one of the trucks. A rational

trier of fact could reasonably have concluded that these items

belonged to illegal aliens being transported by the defendants. As

such, the jury could reasonably have found the essential elements

of the two crimes beyond a reasonable doubt.
3

AFFIRMED.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RlN 2120-AA64

L.. 0

,

• • • * * * *

The revision 00 ofthe AIRBUS A330 ALS [Airworthiness Limitations

Section] Part 3 was issued primarily to iffiroduce two new CMR

[Certification Maintenance Requirements] tasks, referenced 282400-

GOOOI-I-C and 282400-POOOI-I-C. * * '.

product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation

(4910-1

,

:'

listed above that would supersede an existing AD..This proposed AD results from

ALS Part 3 Revision 01 introduces more restrictive requirements for

aircraft copfigurations already in service. * * *.

A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 Series Airplanes

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 Series Airplanes and

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

[Docket No. FAA-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-167-AD)

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

The unsafe condition is safety~significant latent failures that would, in combination with

one or more other specific failures or events, result in a hazardous or catastrophic failure

condition. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe
Phil,

Thanks for this. Glad you were able to work out conflicts issues, look forward to seeing you at the meeting. I understand Navigant is in touch with you to discuss your analysis and whether it
calls for some modification of theirs and/or wa rrants setting aside time for discussion at the plenary. As you know we have formed working gr oups in both the MV and LV groups to look at concerns with the analysis, and propose either modifications or test runs with alternative parameters. I will look to those groups and to Navigant for guidance on how best to deal with the issues you and others raise.

All best,
Richard

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Phil Hopkinson < phopkinson@hvolt.com > wrote:

Good afternoon Richard and all:

Attached, you will find my analysis of distri bution transformer loading, both medium voltage and low voltage, that may prove to be useful for the negotiations. I plan to attend this week’s meetings and would be happy to explai n this report if it would add value.

I would also be glad to expl ain my earlier report on medium voltage distribution transformer selling prices to the end user versus efficiency.

Thanks in advance,

Phil

Philip J Hopkinson, PE
President & CEO HVOLT Inc. 3704 High Ridge Rd. Charlotte, NC 28270 phopkinson@hvolt.com
Ph 704-846-3290
Fx 704-845-2520
Cell 704-236-3320
www.hvolt.com
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C . 4 1 Nort h7 3 West , Inc. , db aAVITA T Westcheste r

an dJe t System s COMPLAINANT/APPELLAN T Th e Count y o f

Westchester , New Yor k RESPONDENT/APPELLE E 

# SEOEBW F



# i AP R 1( 0 200 9 AIRPORTS/ENVIRONMENTA L LAW . AGC-60 0 ' Docke t No . 16-07-1 3

NOTIC E O FEXTENSIO N O FTIM E '1- 1

• :';.7 ) ii o Thi s matte r

i s befor e th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) basedo n th e above reference dcomplaint , file di n accordanc e wit hFA A Rule s o f

Practic e fo r

Federally

- g Assiste dAirpor t

Enforcemen t

Proceedings , 1 4 CFRPar t 16 . Pursuan t

t o 1 4 CFEt^Par

t I6f ^ subpart B , th e dat e b y vi^hic

hth e Fina l Agenc y Decisio n wil l b e issue di n thi s matte r i s hereb y extende dt o Ma y 13 , 2009 . A n extensio n o f

tim e i s necessar y an dappropriat e for afair an dcomplet e determinatio n i n thi s case . AP R 1 0 Catherin e M . Lan g Actin g Associat e Administrato r for Airport s Dat eCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t o n AP

R1 0 2CC

9 ^ j ^^^^^ ^ ^

^ ^^ ^ ^^.^^ ^ State s mai l (firs t

class , postag e paid ) atru e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

addresse dto : Pete r J . Kirsc h Davi dI . Specto r KAPLA N KIRSC H & ROCKWELL , LL P 167 5 Broadway , Suit e 230 0 Denver , Colorad o 8020 2 Richar dCashma n Jame s Wenze l County o f Westcheste r 1 8 Martin e Avenue , Roo m60 0 Whit e Plains , Ne w York , 1060 1 FA A Part 1 6 Airpor t

Proceeding s Docke t

Nikita^Brigh t Airport Comphanc e an dFiel dOperation s
George SHULER, DOC #079741, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quickly erupted volcanic sections of the Steens Basalt, Columbia River Basalt Group: Secular variation, tectonic rotation, and the Steens Mountain reversal      

      January 1, 2008    

The Steens Basalt, now considered part of the Columbia River Basalt Group (CRBG), contains the earliest eruptions of this magmatic episode. Lava flows of the Steens Basalt cover about 50,000 km2 of the Oregon Plateau in sections up to 1000 m thick. The large number of continuously exposed, quickly erupted lava flows (some sections contain over 200 flows) allows for small loops in the magnetic field direction paths to be detected. For volcanic rocks, this detail and fidelity are rarely found outside of the Holocene and yield estimates of eruption durations at our four sections of ∼2.5 ka for 260 m at Pueblo Mountains, 0.5 to 1.5 ka for 190 m at Summit Springs, 1–3 ka for 170 m at North Mickey, and ∼3 ka for 160 m at Guano Rim. That only one reversal of the geomagnetic field occurred during the eruption of the Steens Basalt (the Steens reversal at approximately 16.6 Ma) is supported by comparing 40Ar/39Ar ages and magnetic polarities to the geomagnetic polarity timescale. At Summit Springs two 40Ar/39Ar ages from normal polarity flows (16.72 ± ± 0.29 Ma (16.61) and 16.92 ± ± 0.52 Ma (16.82); ± ± equals 2σ error) place their eruptions after the Steens reversal, while at Pueblo Mountains an 40Ar/39Ar age of 16.72 ± ± 0.21 Ma (16.61) from a reverse polarity flow places its eruption before the Steens reversal. Paleomagnetic field directions yielded 50 nontransitional directional-group poles which, combined with 26 from Steens Mountain, provide a paleomagnetic pole for the Oregon Plateau of 85.7°N, 318.4°E, K = 15.1, A95 = 4.3. Comparison of this new pole with a reference pole derived from CRBG flows from eastern Washington and a synthetic reference pole for North America derived from global data implies relative clockwise rotation of the Oregon Plateau of 7.4 ± 5.0° or 14.5 ± 5.4°, respectively, probably due to northward decreasing extension of the basin and range.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Edward A Mankinen

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

emank@usgs.gov

650-329-4669

## Related Content

#### Edward A Mankinen

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

emank@usgs.gov

650-329-4669

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Volcanic sequence in the Marysvale region in southwest‐central Utah      

      September 21, 1939    

As a consequence of the detailed investigation of the alunite and other mineral deposits of the Marysvale Region in southwest‐central Utah, opportunity was afforded to map and study the succession of volcanic rocks that underlie most of this area. The Marysvale Region is part of a large area of volcanic rocks, which occupies much of the High Plateaus of Utah (Fig. 1). It is believed that the Marysvale Region covers sufficient area to furnish an adequate sample of this volcanic area, and, though horizontal variations are known to occur, the study may serve as a guide as to what may be expected in other parts of the area. The chemical analyses are the most completely representative of any ever taken in this part of Utah, and they furnish a basis of comparison within the High Plateaus and with other areas in Utah.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Southwest-Central Utah
                  - Utah

View All **