alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−23437−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re:

Roberto Fernandez

1631 N 72nd Avenue

Hollywood FL 33024−5472

SSN: XXX−XX−0615

Madelaide Tome

1631 N 72nd Avenue

Hollywood FL 33024−5472

SSN: XXX−XX−0452

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Peter D. Russin to consider the

following:

[32] Motion to Dismiss Case For Other Reason Filed by Trustee Robin R Weiner (Weiner, Robin)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted time for this matter is ten

minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: September 13, 2021

Time: 01:00PM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE COURTHOUSE. Attorneys

must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court

proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and

otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing.

To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimENeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described document(s) on all required parties

within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the

Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio recording maintained by the

Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the official record of the hearing.

Dated: 8/20/2021 By: Robin R Weiner

Case 20-23437-PDR Doc 33 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps      

      January 1, 2000    

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently completed new probabilistic seismic hazard maps for the United States, including Alaska and Hawaii. These hazard maps form the basis of the probabilistic component of the design maps used in the 1997 edition of the NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, prepared by the Building Seismic Safety Council and published by FEMA. The hazard maps depict peak horizontal ground acceleration and spectral response at 0.2, 0.3, and 1.0 sec periods, with 10%, 5%, and 2% probabilities of exceedance in 50 years, corresponding to return times of about 500, 1000, and 2500 years, respectively. In this paper we outline the methodology used to construct the hazard maps. There are three basic components to the maps. First, we use spatially smoothed historic seismicity as one portion of the hazard calculation. In this model, we apply the general observation that moderate and large earthquakes tend to occur near areas of previous small or moderate events, with some notable exceptions. Second, we consider large background source zones based on broad geologic criteria to quantify hazard in areas with little or no historic seismicity, but with the potential for generating large events. Third, we include the hazard from specific fault sources. We use about 450 faults in the western United States (WUS) and derive recurrence times from either geologic slip rates or the dating of pre-historic earthquakes from trenching of faults or other paleoseismic methods. Recurrence estimates for large earthquakes in New Madrid and Charleston, South Carolina, were taken from recent paleoliquefaction studies. We used logic trees to incorporate different seismicity models, fault recurrence models, Cascadia great earthquake scenarios, and ground-motion attenuation relations. We present disaggregation plots showing the contribution to hazard at four cities from potential earthquakes with various magnitudes and distances.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Spirit rover localization and topographic mapping at the landing site of Gusev crater, Mars      

      January 1, 2006    

By sol 440, the Spirit rover has traversed a distance of 3.76 km (actual distance traveled instead of odometry). Localization of the lander and the rover along the traverse has been successfully performed at the Gusev crater landing site. We localized the lander in the Gusev crater using two-way Doppler radio positioning and cartographic triangulations through landmarks visible in both orbital and ground images. Additional high-resolution orbital images were used to verify the determined lander position. Visual odometry and bundle adjustment technologies were applied to compensate for wheel slippage, azimuthal angle drift, and other navigation errors (which were as large as 10.5% in the Husband Hill area). We generated topographic products, including 72 ortho maps and three-dimensional (3-D) digital terrain models, 11 horizontal and vertical traverse profiles, and one 3-D crater model (up to sol 440). Also discussed in this paper are uses of the data for science operations planning, geological traverse surveys, surveys of wind-related features, and other science applications.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Randolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Astrogeology Science Center

rkirk@usgs.gov

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

## Related Content

#### Randolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Astrogeology Science Center

rkirk@usgs.gov

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Gusev Crater; Mars
                  - Gusev Crater
                  -  Mars

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary aeromagnetic map of the Charlotte 1 x 2 degree quadrangle, North Carolina, South Carolina      

      January 1, 1980    

View Plate

The aeromagnetic map of the Charlotte 1 x 2 degree quadrangle was assembled by 6 individual detailed aeromagnetic surveys flown between 1956 and 1976 (see index map). The International Geomagnetic Reference Field had been subtracted from the data prior to assembly. An arbitrary common datum was selected and the surveys were recontoured at the joins. The 100 gamma contour was selected because it shows the magnetic contrast to best advantage. To complement the magnetic data a gravity survey was conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey and this data is available in a companion map (Wilson and Daniels, in press). Each of these maps has been interpreted in relation to the other and to the geologic map prepared as part of the same program (Goldsmith and others, 1978). It should be noted that the geophysics has had a measurable influence on some of the geologic mapping. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Charlotte Quadrangle
                  - North Carolina
                  -  South Carolina

View All **
EX-10.60



 Exhibit 10.60 

2012 Compensation Information for Registrant’s Executive Officers 

The table below provides information regarding (i) the base salary of each executive officer of GTx, Inc. (the “Company”),
effective as of January 1, 2012, and (ii) the target cash bonus award for each of the Company’s executive officers under the Company’s Executive Bonus Compensation Plan for fiscal 2012, expressed as a percentage of applicable
base salary: 
  

											
	 Executive Officer
	  	 Title
	  	2012 Annual
Base Salary
($)	 	 	2012 
Target
Bonus
(%)	 
	 Mitchell S. Steiner
	  	Chief Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman of the Board	  	 	546,000	  	 	 	65	  
	 Mark E. Mosteller
	  	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	  	 	310,006	  	 	 	30	  
	 Marc S. Hanover
	  	President and Chief Operating Officer	  	 	475,020	  	 	 	55	  
	 Ronald A. Morton, Jr.
	  	Vice President, Chief Medical Officer	  	 	470,106	1 	 	 	30	  
	 James T. Dalton
	  	Vice President, Preclinical Research and Development	  	 	416,000	  	 	 	30	  
	 Henry P. Doggrell
	  	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	  	 	351,281	  	 	 	30	  

  

	1 	 Dr. Morton will also be eligible for tax gross-up payments related to certain travel expenses paid by the Company during 2012 on his behalf.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mari Nadine Saturday v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-16-00887-CR

Appellant Mari Nadine Saturday has moved for rehearing of this Court’s opinion of May 

31, 2018. The State of Texas is ORDERED to file a response to Appellant’s motion for rehearing 

no later than July 23, 2018.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: July 3, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4824 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4824

To prohibit restrictions on possession, storage, or use of firearms in 
               Federal programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2016

Mr. Young of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit restrictions on possession, storage, or use of firearms in 
               Federal programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayers Second Amendment 
Protection Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FIREARMS RESTRICTIONS.

    No Federal official or entity may establish any prohibition or 
restriction, or impose any condition, on the otherwise lawful 
possession, storage, or use of firearms for any person assisted under 
any program established, administered, or funded by any Federal entity 
or with any Federal funds.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

In re Chapter

Case No. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES PURSUANT TO FED. R. BANKR. P. 2002(g)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that

requests, pursuant to Rules 2002 and 9007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules) 

and sections 102(1), 342 and 1109(b) of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (as amended, 

the Bankruptcy Code), that all notices given or required to be given and all papers served or required to be served 

in this case be also given to and served, whether electronically or otherwise, on: 

Dated: 

By:/s/

MIAMI DIVISION FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA KATAYAMA WALLACE MABRAY, 7

20-21557-RAM ROBERT A MARK BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Debtor(s) PRA Receivables Management, LLC, as authorized agent for Synchrony Bank (CareCredit - Last four digits of account: 9141 ), a creditor in the above-captioned chapter 7 case, REQUEST OF PRA RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, LLC Synchrony Bank c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC PO Box 41021 Telephone: (877)885-5919 Facsimile: (757) 351-3257 Assignee Creditor: CareCredit - Last four digits of account: 9141 E-mail: Claims_RMSC@PRAGroup.com Norfolk, VA 23541 Norfolk, Virginia October 23, 2020 Valerie Smith Valerie Smith c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC Senior Manager PO Box 41021 Norfolk, VA 23541 (877)885-5919

Case 20-21557-RAM Doc 9 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 1
Case 20-19403-EPK Doc 2 Filed 08/28/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-19403-EPK Doc 2 Filed 08/28/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-19403-EPK Doc 2 Filed 08/28/20 Page 3 of 3
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# muitett**~tate~** 

# <!Court of**§ppeaI~** 

# for tbejf 

# eberaI <!Circuit
HARRY BURNETT, Petitioner, 

### v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

2012-3102 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0432110400-I-1. ON MOTION



### ORDER The Department ofJustice moves without opposition for a 20-day extension oftime, until October 17, 2012, to file its brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-3102 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 10/01/2012HARRYBURNETTv.DOJ The motion is granted. 

## OCT 01 2012 Date
cc: Jane W. Vanneman, Esq. Lloyd 

### E. Tooks, Esq. s27 FOR THE COURT /s/Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 12-3102 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 10/01/2012
Exhibit 10.9

Annual Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the undersigned officers of Credit Suisse Group, a
company incorporated in Switzerland (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 ("Amendment No. 1") of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company for such period presented.

|Dated:    April 27, 2004 |  | Name:  |  | /s/OSWALD J. GRÜBELOswald J. Grübel
|------------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer            
|                         |  |        |  |                                    
|Dated:    April 27, 2004 |  | Name:  |  | /s/JOHN J. MACKJohn J. Mack        
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer            
|                         |  |        |  |                                    
|Dated:    April 27, 2004 |  | Name:  |  | /s/PHILIP K. RYANPhilip K. Ryan    
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer            

---
LA VENSTON LAMONT HORNE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1397

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## NUMBER 13
- 2 1
- 00 289
- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

BRYCE ALLEN VARNER , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 3 6 th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva Order Per Curiam
Appellant, Bryce Allen Varner , filed a notice of appeal with this Court attempting to
appeal the trial court ’ s final judgment in cause number A

- 19

- 5185

- CR

. The trial court clerk is required to provide a copy of the certification of the defendant’s right of appeal to this

Court. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(e). The trial court’s certificate of appeal in this matter states
appellant has a “ limited ” right to appeal which is unclear and conflicts with portions of the2 reporter’s record

. On September 10 , 2021 and October 14
, 2021
, the C lerk of the C ourt

notified the t rial court that the certificate was unclear and requested an amended

certificate. To date, we have not received a n amended trial court’s certification or clarification regarding appellant’s “limited” right to appeal

. Therefore, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for a
hearing to determine whether the appellant has a right to appeal. We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding appellant’s right to
appeal this matt er

. The trial court shall cause its amended certification, if any, along with findings of fact and conclusions of law to be included in a supplemental clerk's record.

The trial court is directed to cause the supplemental record to be filed with the Clerk o f this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 22nd day of Dec ember, 2021

.
6000

8000 10000 12000 14000**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)** 

# Design **Line 8 Cost**

**- Ef**  **ficiency Curve (Lowest Cost per dEL)** 

M6

M5

M4

M3

H0 **dEL 0 dEL 3**  **dEL 4 dEL 5**  **dEL 6 dEL 7**  **dEL 2 dEL 1** 

0 2000 4000 6000

98.4 98.6 98.8 99 99.2 99.4 99.6 99.8**M a** **n u** **f a** **c t** **u r** **e r** **S e** **l l** **i n** **g P** **r i** **c e** **( $** **)**



# Ef **ficiency at 35% Load, T**  **emper atur**  **e Corr**  **ect ed**  H0

ZDMH

SA1

dELs**M6**

**dEL Efficiency**  **MSP Design**  **TSL Graph Setup**

0 98.6 5295.237 D08_C01_G1_A0.75_B0.00 98.6 0 1 98.8 5861.886 D08_C01_F1_A0.50_B0.05 98.6 1000000 2 99.02 8797.639 D08_C02_G2_A5.00_B0.40 98.8 0 3 99.14 98.8 1000000 4 99.25 99.02 0 5 99.32 99.02 1000000 6 99.44 99.14 0 7 99.58 99.14 1000000 99.25 0 **M5** 99.25 1000000 **dEL Efficiency**  **MSP Design**  99.32 0

0 98.6 5705.415 D08_C03_F1_A0.50_B0.00 99.32 1000000 1 98.8 6020.312 D08_C03_F3_A16.00_B0.16 99.44 0 2 99.02 6624.693 D08_C04_F3_A15.00_B0.15 99.44 1000000 3 99.14 99.58 0 4 99.25 99.58 1000000 5 99.32 6 99.44 7 99.58

**M4 dEL**  **Efficiency MSP**  **Design**

0 98.6 7913.331 D08_C05_F1_A1.50_B0.03 1 98.8 7913.331 D08_C05_F1_A1.50_B0.03 2 99.02 8370.625 D08_C05_G2_A3.50_B0.40 3 99.14 10055.48 D08_C05_F3_A10.00_B1.60 4 99.25 5 99.32 6 99.44 7 99.58

**M3 dEL**  **Efficiency MSP**  **Design**

0 98.6 6108.935 D08_C08_G1_A0.00_B0.00 1 98.8 6108.935 D08_C08_G1_A0.00_B0.00 2 99.02 6258.655 D08_C08_F1_A1.50_B0.09 3 99.14 6805.717 D08_C08_F3_A12.00_B0.12 4 99.25 8746.478 D08_C07_F3_A14.00_B0.00 5 99.32 6 99.44 7 99.58

**H0 dEL**  **Efficiency MSP**  **Design**

0 98.6 7504.172 D08_C10_F1_A1.50_B0.14 1 98.8 7504.172 D08_C10_F1_A1.50_B0.14 2 99.02 7504.172 D08_C10_F1_A1.50_B0.143 99.14 7628.706 D08_C10_F1_A0.50_B0.13

4 99.25 8279.857 D08_C11_F2_A5.00_B0.20 5 99.32 9383.905 D08_C11_G2_A8.00_B0.80 6 99.44 7 99.58

**ZDMH dEL**  **Efficiency MSP**  **Design**

0 98.6 7192.225 D08_C12_F1_A0.50_B0.00 1 98.8 7192.225 D08_C12_F1_A0.50_B0.00 2 99.02 7192.225 D08_C12_F1_A0.50_B0.00 3 99.14 7264.099 D08_C12_F1_A1.50_B0.14 4 99.25 8570.367 D08_C12_F3_A16.00_B0.36 5 99.32 6 99.44 7 99.58

**SA1 dEL**  **Efficiency MSP**  **Design**

0 98.6 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 1 98.8 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 2 99.02 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 3 99.14 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 4 99.25 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 5 99.32 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 6 99.44 8866.442 D08_C14_F1_A1.50_B0.03 7 99.58 13025.27 D08_C15_F2_A8.00_B2.88
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−17766−RAM

Chapter: 7

In re:

Jesus G Fu

250 W 74th Place #406

Hialeah FL 33014−5018

SSN: XXX−XX−7432

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Robert A Mark to consider the

following:

[36] Motion to Compel Midland Credit Management to Turnover Estate Funds Filed by Trustee Soneet

Kapila (Kapila, Soneet)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted time for this matter is ten

minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: August 11, 2022

Time: 11:00AM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE COURTHOUSE. Attorneys

must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court

proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and

otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing.

To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsduqrrTIsGwLENmZWZhscEHry3et9jXQ

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described document(s) on all required parties

within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the

Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio recording maintained by the

Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the official record of the hearing.

Dated: 7/12/2022 By: Soneet Kapila

Case 20-17766-RAM Doc 37 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 1