alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11(a)


AMENDMENT TO THE J. RANDALL WOODSON


CHANGE IN CONTROL PROTECTIVE AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, J. Randall
Woodson (the “Employee”) entered into a Change in Control Protective Agreement with First South Bank (the “Bank”)
and First South Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) effective October 3, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section
8 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended or modified at any time by means of a written instrument signed by
the parties; and


 


WHEREAS, the Bank
and the Company have determined it is in the best interest of the Bank, the Company and the Employee to amend the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the
Bank, the Company and the Employee agree to amend the Agreement effective February 29, 2012 as follows:


 


Section 3. Severance Benefit


 


		1.	The first sentence in Section 3 (a) shall be amended to read as follow:



 


“If the Employee becomes entitled to
collect severance benefits pursuant to Section 2 hereof, the Bank shall pay the Employee a severance benefit equal to two (2) times
the Employee’s base annual salary at the rate in effect when the Protected Period begins.”


 


		2.	Nothing contained herein shall be held to alter, vary or affect any of the terms, provisions, or
conditions of the Agreement entered into thereunder, other than stated above.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Bank and the Company have caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the Employee has signed
this Amendment, on the 29th day of February, 2012.


 


 


	ATTEST:	FIRST SOUTH BANK
	 	 
	/s/ William L. Wall	/s/ Thomas A. Vann
	Secretary	President
	 	 
	 	 
	ATTEST:	FIRST SOUTH BANCORP, INC.
	 	 
	/s/ William L. Wall	/s/ Thomas A. Vann
	Secretary	President
	 	 
	 	 
	WITNESS:	EMPLOYEE
	 	 
	/s/ Kristie W. Hawkins	/s/ J. Randall Woodson
	 	J. Randall Woodson



    	4
**EXHIBIT 31.1 —**CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE IN ANNUAL REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-K
I, Cristina M. Lambert, certify that:
1)  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Telecomunicaciones de PuertoRico, Inc. (the “registrant”); 2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4)  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5)  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005  /s/Cristina M. Lambert Name: Cristina M. Lambert Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

233 

CA 11-01807 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF PETER S. DUCHMANN AND DUKE 

DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS 

ADVANCED AUTO ELECTRONICS, 

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TOWN OF HAMBURG, TOWN OF HAMBURG TOWN BOARD, 

TOWN OF HAMBURG BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, 

KURT ALLEN, ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, BUILDINGS 

INSPECTIONS AND CODE ENFORCEMENT, 

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, 

LAMAR ADVERTISING OF PENN, LLC, TLC 

PROPERTIES, INC., LAMAR COMPANY, LLC,

AND LAMAR TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

RESPONDENTS. 

 

HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP, BUFFALO (MARC A. ROMANOWSKI OF COUNSEL),

FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS. 

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS J. DICESARE OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the

Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered August 22,

2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, among

other things, dismissed the petition against respondents Town of

Hamburg, Town of Hamburg Town Board, Town of Hamburg Board of Zoning

Appeals and Kurt Allen, Enforcement Officer, Buildings Inspections and

Code Enforcement. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioners appeal from a judgment in this CPLR

article 78 proceeding that, inter alia, dismissed the petition against

respondents Town of Hamburg (Town), Town of Hamburg Town Board, Town

of Hamburg Board of Zoning Appeals and Kurt Allen, Enforcement

Officer, Buildings Inspections and Code Enforcement. All but one of

petitioners’ contentions herein were previously before us on their

appeal from the judgment that, inter alia, dismissed the petition in

this proceeding against respondents Lamar Advertising of Penn, LLC,

TLC Properties, Inc., Lamar Company, LLC and Lamar Texas Limited

Partnership. We affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in our
-2- 233 

CA 11-01807 

decision in Matter of Duchmann v Town of Hamburg (90 AD3d 1642), in

which we affirmed the judgment in that prior appeal.

We add only that petitioners’ remaining contention that the Town

failed to provide “a certified transcript of the record of the

proceedings under consideration” pursuant to CPLR 7804 (e) is without

merit inasmuch as the Town “provided Supreme Court with sufficient

material necessary to render a decision in this matter” (Matter of

Argyle Conservation League v Town of Argyle, 223 AD2d 796, 798).

Entered: March 23, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service


Request for Proposals (RFP): Special Research Grants Program, 
Potato Research

Correction

    In notice document 97-157, beginning on page 876, in the issue of 
Monday, January 6, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 876, in the third column, in the third paragraph, in the 
eighth line, ``$41,134,612'' should read ``$1,134,612''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON •

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 76133-1

v. Respondent, ) ) ) DIVISION ONE ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION (71 BRIAN DANSIE, Appellant. ) ) ) 

### APR 1 7 2017

FILED: :La rrl

—n> ) co, m PER CURIAM. - Petitioner Brian Dansie has filed a motion for c? r\,) discretionary review of trial court orders denying his motion to vacate the record of his criminal conviction. The State of Washington filed a motion to concede error and remand for a new hearing. Dansie filed an answer to the State's motion, and the State has filed a reply. The motion for discretionary review is granted. We also accept the State's concession of error in part, accelerate review, and remand. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify on the record the "good cause" reason for denying the motion to vacate under RCW 9.94A.640. We decline Dansie's request that the matter be remanded for a new hearing before a different judge. Remanded for further proceedings.

For the Court:
02 NCAC 09L .1807 SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT APPLICATIONS (a) Concerning application information requirements contained in 40 CFR Sections 170.122 and 170.222 the following is also required to be completed by the agricultural employer: (1) In addition to the requirements of Sections 170.122(c)(3), and 170.222(c)(3), the specific time of day when each pesticide application was completed must be recorded immediately upon completion of the application. Each day of the application shall be recorded as a separate record.

(2) After the application information referenced in (a)(1) of this Rule and the other information in Sections 170.122(c) and 170.222(c) has been displayed for the required period of time in Section

170.122 (b) and 170.222(b), the agricultural employer shall maintain the information for a period of two years from the specific time of day when each pesticide application was completed. Such information shall be available for inspection and copying by the Board or its agents upon their

request. (b) In addition to information contained in Section 170.224(b), the handler employer must make the agricultural owner aware of the specific time of day when each pesticide application was completed. The agricultural emp loyer shall display the information immediately and shall make it part of the record required to be maintained in Paragraph (a)(1) and (2) of this Rule.

History Note: Authority G.S. 143

- 466(a); Eff. May 1, 2009.
STN Columbus

=> e zinc cinnamate/cn E1 1 ZINC CHROMIUM SULFIDE (ZNCR2S4)/CN E2 1 ZINC CHRYSOTILE/CN E3 1 -- > ZINC CINNAMATE/CN E4 1 ZINC CIS - TETRACHLOROCROTONATE/CN E5 1 ZINC CITRATE/CN E6 1 ZINC CITRATE (1:1)/CN E7 1 ZINC CITRATE (ZN3(C6H5O7)2)/CN E8 1 ZINC CITRATE DIHYDRATE/CN E9 1 ZINC CITRATE TRIHYDRATE/CN E10 1 ZINC CLAD II PLUS/CN E11 1 ZINC CLUSTER (ZN2)/CN E12 1 ZINC CLUSTER (ZN4)/CN => s e3 L1 1 "ZINC CINNAMATE"/CN => d L1 ANSWER 1 OF 1 REGISTRY COPYRIGHT 2012 ACS on STN RN 18957 - 59 - 0 REGISTRY ED Entered STN: 16 Nov 1984 CN 2 - Propenoic acid, 3 - phenyl - , zinc salt (2:1) (CA INDEX NAME) OTHER CA INDEX NAMES: CN 2 - Propenoic acid, 3 - phenyl - , zinc salt (9CI) CN Cinnamic acid, zinc salt (8CI) OTHER NAMES: CN **Zinc cinnamate** CN Zinc dicinnamate MF C9 H8 O2 . 1/2 Zn CI COM LC STN Files: CA, CAPLUS, CASREACT, CHEMLIST, IFICDB, IFIPAT, IFIUDB,

TOXCENTER, USPAT2, USPATFULL, USPATOLD Other Sources: EINECS** (**Enter CHEMLIST File for up - to - date regulatory information) CRN (621 - 82 - 9)

18 REFERENCES IN FILE CA (1907 TO DA TE) 3 REFERENCES TO NON - SPECIFIC DERIVATIVES IN FILE CA 18 REFERENCES IN FILE CAPLUS (1907 TO DATE) => file chemlist COST IN U.S. DOLLARS SINCE FILE TOTAL ENTRY SESSION FULL ESTIMATED COST 8.57 8.81STN Columbus

=> s L1 L2 1 L1 => d L2 ANSWER 1 of 1 CHEMLIST COPYRIGHT 2012 ACS on STN AN 116543 CHEMLIST RN **18957 -**  **59 -**  **0** CN zinc cinnamate (REACH, EINECS) cinnamate de zinc (French) (EINECS) Zinkcinnamat (German) (EINECS) cinamato de cinc (Spanish) (EINECS) 2 - Propenoic acid, 3 - phenyl - , zinc salt 2 - Propenoic acid, 3 - phenyl - , zinc salt (2:1) Cinnami c acid, zinc salt Zinc dicinnamate FS EEC: EINECS; EU: REACH CBI Public RLN EC No.: 242 - 700 - 0 EINECS No.: 242 - 700 - 0 INV On REACH

List of Pre - Registered Substances, March 2009. Registration Date: 31 - MAY - 2013. On EINECS Annex to Official Journal of the European Communities, 15 June 1990. FA RN CAS Registry Number RLN Regulatory List Number INV Inventory Status
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5020 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5020

 To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service to submit 
 to Congress a report on the effects on public health of the increased 
                    rate of use of synthetic drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2016

Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Mr. Gowdy, Mr. Collins of New York, and Mr. 
 Butterfield) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service to submit 
 to Congress a report on the effects on public health of the increased 
                    rate of use of synthetic drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Synthetic Drug Awareness Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON EFFECTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH OF SYNTHETIC DRUG USE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than three years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service 
shall submit to Congress a report on the effects on public health of 
the increase since January 2010 in the rate of use of synthetic drugs 
in the United States by individuals who are at least 12 years of age 
but not more than 18 years of age.
    (b) Synthetic Drug Defined.--For purposes of subsection (a), the 
term ``synthetic drug'' means a drug which is developed and 
manufactured to avoid control under the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 801 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 61426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-31117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-AWP-23]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Flagstaff, AZ

Correction

    In rule document 97-28103, beginning on page 55157, in the issue of 
Thursday, October 23, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 55158, in the third column, under AWP AZ E5 Flagstaff, AZ 
[Revised], in the 11th line from the bottom of the paragraph, 
``111 deg.25#33##W'' should read ``111 deg.35#33##W''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration

49 CFR Part 172

[Docket No. HM-206]
RIN 2137-AB75


Improvements to Hazardous Materials Identification Systems; 
Corrections and Responses to Petitions for Reconsideration

Correction

    In rule document 97-18995, beginning on page 39398, in the issue of 
Tuesday, July 22, 1997, make the following correction:


Sec. 172.313  [Corrected]

    On page 39405, in Sec. 172.313 in amendatory instruction 6., in the 
first line ``added'' should read ``amended''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

32 34 36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲
▲
▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AcuNetx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Corrigan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 24, 2010


/s/ Robert S. CorriganRobert S. CorriganPresident and Chief Executive Officer





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "FILED" by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO.: 20-23123-LMI

ALEXANDER PETER MARTINEZ In proceedings under Chapter 11

 Debtor.

 /

ORDER DISMISSING BANKRUPTCY CASE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on June 8, 2021 upon the Debtor’s

Motion to Dismiss Case (ECF 61). The Court, having reviewed the file, and for the reasons

stated on the record,

ORDERS as follows:

1. The instant Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case is hereby DISMISSED.

2. The Debtor shall file with the Court all pending monthly operating reports

through the date of dismissal, indicating the cash disbursements for the relevant periods since the

period reported on the last Debtor-in-Possession report filed by the Debtor.

3. Debtor shall pay all administrative fees awarded by the Court, including the

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 15, 2021.

Case 20-23123-LMI Doc 72 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Subchapter V trustee fees and debtor’s counsel’s fees. 

4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Order.

###

Submitted by: Susan D Lasky, Esq.

320 SE 18th Street 

Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316

954-400-7474

Copies to (Via Clerk of Courts):

All parties that appeared via CM/ECF

Debtor

All creditors as listed on the Creditor Mailing Matrix

2

Case 20-23123-LMI Doc 72 Filed 06/16/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001097068
<NAME> XRAYMEDIA.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         179,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,367
<PP&E>                                         148,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 690,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,031
<OTHER-SE>                                     577,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   690,771
<SALES>                                         33,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,050
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,007,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,007,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,007,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,974,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>