alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4978 

To require the Government Accountability Office to submit to Congress a 

report on neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in the United States 

and its treatment under Medicaid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2016 

Mr. JENKINS of West Virginia (for himself, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. COSTELLO of 

Pennsylvania, Ms. KUSTER, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. POLIQUIN, and Mr. 

WOMACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Government Accountability Office to submit 

to Congress a report on neonatal abstinence syndrome 

(NAS) in the United States and its treatment under 

Medicaid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nurturing And Sup5 porting Healthy Babies Act’’ or as the ‘‘NAS Healthy Ba6 bies Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4978 IH

1 SEC. 2. GAO REPORT ON NEONATAL ABSTINENCE SYN2 DROME (NAS). 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

5 of the United States shall submit to the Committee on 

6 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

7 and the Committee on Finance and the Committee on 

8 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate a 

9 report on neonatal abstinence syndrome (in this section 

10 referred to as ‘‘NAS’’) in the United States. 

11 (b) INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN REPORT.— 

12 Such report shall include information on the following: 

13 (1) The prevalence of NAS in the United 

14 States, including the proportion of children born in 

15 the United States with NAS who are eligible for 

16 medical assistance under State Medicaid programs 

17 under title XIX of the Social Security Act at birth 

18 and the costs associated with NAS through such 

19 programs. 

20 (2) The services for which coverage is available 

21 under State Medicaid programs for treatment of in22 fants with NAS. 

23 (3) The settings (including inpatient, out24 patient, hospital-based, and other settings) for the 

25 treatment of infants with NAS and the reimburseVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:28 Apr 25, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4978.IH H4978

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4978 IH

1 ment methodologies and costs associated with such 

2 treatment in such settings. 

3 (4) The prevalence of utilization of various care 

4 settings under State Medicaid programs for treat5 ment of infants with NAS and any Federal barriers 

6 to treating such infants under such programs, par7 ticularly in non-hospital-based settings. 

8 (c) RECOMMENDATIONS.—Such report also shall in9 clude such recommendations as the Comptroller General 

10 determines appropriate for improvements that will ensure 

11 access to treatment for infants with NAS under State 

12 Medicaid programs. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2004321EN.01002301.xml

| 22.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 321/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 321/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1828/2004

of 21 October 2004

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 so as to include Timor-Leste in the list of countries enjoying the special arrangements for the least developed countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 (1), and in particular Article 35 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 provides for more favourable tariff treatment for the least developed countries, designated as such by the United Nations (UN), listed in Annex I to that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 provides for more favourable tariff treatment for the least developed countries, designated as such by the United Nations (UN), listed in Annex I to that Regulation.

| (2) | Following a recommendation of the UN Economic and Social Council, Timor-Leste was added to the list of least-developed countries by a resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly of 17 December 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following a recommendation of the UN Economic and Social Council, Timor-Leste was added to the list of least-developed countries by a resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly of 17 December 2003.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Generalised Preferences Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Generalised Preferences Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001, after the entry ‘TL’ the name ‘East Timor’ is replaced by ‘Timor-Leste’ and a cross is added to column H.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 October 2004.

For the Commission

Pascal LAMY

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 905/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 45).

1

---
Exhibit 10.47





SOUTHERN COMMUNITY BANK AND TRUST





Amendment # 3 to the


Salary Continuation Agreement of


James C. Monroe, Jr.




This Amendment #3 (herein referred to as the “Amendment”) to the Salary Continuation Agreement(herein referred to as the “Original Agreement”) that was entered into on 29th day of June, 2007, by and between Southern Community Bank andTrust, a North Carolina-chartered bank (herein referred to as the “Bank”), and James C. Monroe, Jr., its Senior Vice President/Treasurer(herein referred to as the “Executive”).





WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Original Agreement provides that the Original Agreement may be modified by the mutual written contest of both the Bank and the Executive;





WHEREAS,the Bank and the Executive believe it to be in the best interest of each party to modify the benefit amount payable under the Original Agreement, and therefore do hereby mutually agree to “freeze” the Executive’s “Accrual Account” as of December 31, 2010 as defined in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement. The Amount of such frozen Accrual Account as of December 31, 2010 is $149,709;





WHEREAS,the amount of the Executive’s frozen “Accrued Account” as of December 31, 2010 shall be converted to a monthly Life Annuity in accordance with the Actuarial(Actuarially) Equivalentfactors as provided in Section 1.2(a) of the Original Agreement and such new amount shall be payable as of his Normal Retirement Date in accordance with Section 2.1(a).





WHEREAS,the Executive understands and agrees that no additional benefits shall accrue under the Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment #3 after December 31, 2010, until such time that the Executive and the Bank mutually agree in writing to a change in future benefit accruals.  The Executive understands that the Bank will review the Original Agreement and this Amendment #3 for reinstatement in 2012.





WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive intend that this Amendment # 3 shall supersede the amount of monthly (and annual) benefits previously provided in Section 2.1(a) of the Original Agreement.





NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Bank hereby agree as follows:





Section 2.1
Normal Retirement Benefit is amended by deleting the current subsection (a) and replacing it in its entirety with the following new subsection (a):





(a)
Amount of Normal Form of benefit. The annual Normal Retirement benefit under this Section 2.1 is $17,917, which shall be paid in monthly installments in the monthly amount of $1,493 for the Life of the Executive (Normal Form is a Life Annuity).





Page 1





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Bank have executed this Amendment # 3 to the Salary Continuation Agreement as of this 16th day of December, 2010.





Executive:

Southern Community Bank and Trust:/s/ James C. Monroe, Jr.

By:
/s/ F. Scott BauerJames C. Monroe, Jr.


Title:
Chief Executive Officer





Page 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seismic sources in the aleutian cradle of tsunamis      

      September 26, 2022    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Rob Witter, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

rwitter@usgs.gov

907-786-7404

#### Rich Briggs

##### Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

rbriggs@usgs.gov

303-273-8465

## Related Content

#### Rob Witter, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

rwitter@usgs.gov

907-786-7404

#### Rich Briggs

##### Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

rbriggs@usgs.gov

303-273-8465

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Earthquake Hazards
                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Using Global Fiducials Library high-resolution imagery, commercial satellite imagery, Landsat and Sentinel satellite imagery, and aerial photography to monitor change at East Timbalier Island, Louisiana, 1953–2021      

      January 20, 2023    

View Report

XML Format

Version History

This report documents morphological changes between 1953 and 2021 at East Timbalier Island, Louisiana, a Gulf of Mexico barrier island. East Timbalier Island, which was located west of the Mississippi River Delta at the front of Timbalier Bay, was one of the most rapidly changing barrier islands on Earth. Since aerial photographs were initially taken in 1953, the Island steadily lost length and area, finally eroding away by early summer 2021. After major storm events, sediment eroded from the Island and migrated hundreds of meters north. In August 1992, Hurricane Andrew breached the Island in several places, resulting in increased erosion and land loss. Until it completely eroded away, the Island underwent a cycle of washovers, vegetation removal, breaching, and erosion with sediment transport to the north. Satellite imagery shows that three such cycles occurred between 1992 and 2017, despite the partial restoration of the Island between 1998 and 2000. Each cycle increased the distance between the Island and the mainland to the east, reducing both the sediment supply from the east and the protection that Timbalier Bay and the adjacent coastal lands received from the barrier island.

Previously, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Civil Applications Center used 1-meter resolution imagery archived at the USGS Global Fiducials Library (GFL), collected between 2000 and 2010 by U.S. National Imaging Systems, to monitor the changes at the Island. New research expands this study retrospectively and prospectively using aerial photography collected from 1953 to 2012 and in 2020; declassified imagery collected in 1962, 1972, and 1975; DigitalGlobe satellite imagery collected since 2004; Landsat satellite imagery collected since 1972; Sentinel–2 satellite imagery collected since 2015; and GFL imagery collected from 1991 to 2020.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           

July 28, 2020

####                 Six Decades of Change at East Timbalier Island, Louisiana              

## Related Content

July 28, 2020

####                 Six Decades of Change at East Timbalier Island, Louisiana              

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - east timbalier island
                  - Louisiana

View All **
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHER DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

(MIAMI)

IN RE:

It’Sugar FL I LLC,

Debtor.

CASE NO. 20-20259-RAM

CHAPTER 11

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE

NOW COMES Louis G. Spencer, of the undersigned firm Alexander Ricks PLLC, 

and enters his appearance for Victory Retail I, L.P. (“VR”), a creditor in the case.

The undersigned on behalf of VR hereby requests that notices given or required to 

be served in this case be given to and served upon the undersigned at the office address, 

email address, and telephone number set forth below.

Please take further notice that the foregoing request includes the notices and papers 

referred to in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and also includes, without 

limitation, notices of any orders, applications, complaints, demands, hearings, motions, 

petitions, pleadings or requests, and any other documents brought before this Court in this 

case, whether formal or informal, written or oral, and whether transmitted or conveyed by 

mail, delivery, telephone, email or otherwise. 

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Louis G. Spencer

Louis G. Spencer

Florida State Bar No. 0605451

1420 E. 7th Street, Suite 100

Case 20-20259-RAM Doc 85 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 2
Charlotte, NC 28204

Tel: (980) 335-0711

Fax: (704) 365-3676

Email: louis@alexanderricks.com

Attorney for Creditor

Victory Retail I, L.P.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern 

District of Florida (Miami), using the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system 

(EM/ECF). I hereby certify that all counsel and pro se parties of record have been served 

electronically or by another means authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2) 

on October 13, 2020.

 /s/ Louis G. Spencer

Louis G. Spencer

Case 20-20259-RAM Doc 85 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           A trade-off solution between model resolution and covariance in surface-wave inversion      

      January 1, 2010    

Regularization is necessary for inversion of ill-posed geophysical problems. Appraisal of inverse models is essential for meaningful interpretation of these models. Because uncertainties are associated with regularization parameters, extra conditions are usually required to determine proper parameters for assessing inverse models. Commonly used techniques for assessment of a geophysical inverse model derived (generally iteratively) from a linear system are based on calculating the model resolution and the model covariance matrices. Because the model resolution and the model covariance matrices of the regularized solutions are controlled by the regularization parameter, direct assessment of inverse models using only the covariance matrix may provide incorrect results. To assess an inverted model, we use the concept of a trade-off between model resolution and covariance to find a proper regularization parameter with singular values calculated in the last iteration. We plot the singular values from large to small to form a singular value plot. A proper regularization parameter is normally the first singular value that approaches zero in the plot. With this regularization parameter, we obtain a trade-off solution between model resolution and model covariance in the vicinity of a regularized solution. The unit covariance matrix can then be used to calculate error bars of the inverse model at a resolution level determined by the regularization parameter. We demonstrate this approach with both synthetic and real surface-wave data. ?? 2010 Birkh??user / Springer Basel AG.

## Citation Information
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-40146

____________________

MIKE LOEHR & COMPANY, INCORPORTED,

doing business as Landmark Foods

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall

 (2:93-CV-166) 

_______________________________________________

November 14, 1997

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, C. Wayne Cape, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Optio Software, Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that the materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

(b)   intentionallyleft blank

 

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: December 10, 2007    
|     |                    |
|----------|-------------------------|
|     | /s/ C. Wayne Cape       |   |
| * * | *C. Wayne Cape*         |
|     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Relatedness and social organization of coypus in the Argentinean pampas      

      January 1, 2009    

Behavioural and trapping studies of the social organization of coypus have suggested the occurrence of kin groups and a polygynous mating system. We used 16 microsatellite markers to analyse parentage and relatedness relationships in two populations (J??uregui and Villa Ruiz) in the Argentinean Pampas. At J??uregui, a dominant male monopolized most paternities, leading to a high variance in reproductive success between males and a high level of polygyny. At Villa Ruiz, variance in reproductive success was low among resident males and males were the fathers of zero to four offspring each. For females, no significant differences were found. Two different social groups in each study site were used to assess genetic relatedness within and between groups. These groups were neighbouring at J??uregui but not at Villa Ruiz. At Villa Ruiz, coypus were significantly more related within than between groups, suggesting that behavioural groups were also genetic ones, and adult females were more related within than between groups, as should be expected for kin groups. This relationship was not found at J??uregui. Our results provide support to previous studies based on behavioural and trapping data, which indicate that coypus form social groups and have a polygynous mating system. However, we found differences in social organization between the two populations. This is the first study to determine parentage and/or relatedness in coypus. ?? 2008 The Authors.

## Citation Information