alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 116 (Tuesday, June 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 32859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-20617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Chapter XXXV

RIN 3206-AG87, 3209-AA15


Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the 
Office of Personnel Management

Correction

    In rule document 96-18020 beginning on page 36993 in the issue of 
Tuesday, July 16, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 4501.103  [Corrected]

    On page 36996, in the third column, in Sec. 4501.103(a)(3), in the 
last line, ``CFR'' should read ``CFC''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 136 (Monday, July 17, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 36462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10717]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 136 / Monday, July 17, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 36462]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

37 CFR Parts 1 and 3

[Docket No. 950404087-5087-01]

RIN 0651-AA76


Changes to Implement 20-Year Patent Term and Provisional 
Applications

Correction

    In rule document 95-9838 beginning on page 20195 in the issue of 
Tuesday, April 25, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 20197, in the first column, in the fifth paragraph, in 
the fourth line, insert ``Official'' after ``Office''.
    2. On page 20199, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in 
the first line, ``Section 1.136'' should read ``Section 1.316''.
    3. On page 20207, in the third column, in the fourth paragraph, in 
the eighth line, ``35-year'' should read ``5-year''.
    4. On page 20208, in the 2d column, in the 3d paragraph, in the 
10th line, ``and'' should read ``a''.
    5. On page 20209, in the first column, in the second paragraph, in 
the seventh line, ``field'' should read ``filed''.
    6. On page 20210, in the second column, in the seventh paragraph, 
in the nineth and tenth lines, ``35 U.S.C. 11(b)(8).'' should read ``35 
U.S.C. 111(b)(8).''
    7. On page 20214, in the first column, in the first paragraph, in 
the fourth line, ``by'' should read ``be''.
    8. On page 20217, in the third column, in the eighth paragraph, in 
the seventh line, ``time'' should read ``term''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Michelle Denise WESTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2223

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          50,849
<SECURITIES>                                    48,249
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,976
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,319
<PP&E>                                          30,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           368
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,736
<SALES>                                         96,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,535
<CGS>                                           21,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,331)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.34)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8537]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Christopher Williams: The Production Line of 
Happiness''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Christopher Williams: The Product Line of 
Happiness,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with foreign owners or custodians. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on or about January 25, 
2014, until on or about May 18, 2014; the Museum of Modern Art, New 
York, NY, from on or about August 2, 2014, until on or about November 
2, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 21, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-28502 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re: Case No. 20-13363-PGH

Chapter 11

BULLSEYE COATING AND

BLASTING CORP,

ein: 81-0-714458

Debtor.

______________________________________/

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

PURSUANT TO FED.R.BANKR.P. 2016(b)

1. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2016(b), I certify

that I am the attorney for the above-named debtor(s) and that the following

supplemental compensation has been paid to me or agreed to be paid to me, for services

rendered or to be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation or in connection

with the bankruptcy case is as follows: 

For legal services, I have agreed to accept: $25,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement, I have received: $783.00

Balance Due: $24,217.00

 2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 O Debtor G Other (specify)

 

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 O Debtor G Other (specify)

4. O I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with

any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 G I have agreed to share the above disclosed compensation with a

person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A copy of the

agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the

compensation, is attached.

Case 20-13363-PGH Doc 5 Filed 03/12/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal

service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice

to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any amended petitions, schedules,

statements, lists, and/or plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors,

examinations, and confirmation hearings, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. Representation of the debtor in adversary proceedings and other

contested bankruptcy matters;

e. Other provisions: None

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not

include the following services: None.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to

me for representation of the debtor(s) in this bankruptcy proceeding. 

Certificate of Admission

I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set

forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Dated: March 12, 2020

/s/ 

PETER SPINDEL

Florida Bar No. 816183

Attorney for Debtor

Peter Spindel, Esq., PA

8306 Mills Dr. #458

Miami, Florida 33183-4838

Telephone: (305) 279-2126

Facsimile: (305) 418-0158

peterspindel@gmail.com

3879.2001

\bullseye1.aty

Case 20-13363-PGH Doc 5 Filed 03/12/20 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), the undersigned hereby certify that thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
     TELECOMUNICACIONES DE PUERTO RICO, INC.      By: /s/ Cristina M. Lambert           Name: Cristina M. Lambert   Title: Chief Executive Officer   Date: March 30, 2004      By: /s/ Adail Ortiz
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10123]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 3563]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Chapter IV

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

29 CFR Chapter XXV

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Chapter I


Health Insurance Portability

Correction

    In proposed rule document 96-33293, beginning on page 68697, in the 
issue of Monday December 30, 1997, make the following correction.
    On page 68697, in the second column, in the second line from the 
bottom, the HCFA e-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dbbbbbb2a9b2afbd9bbdb3b8bdbaf5bcb4ad">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8de4ffe4f9ebcdebe5eeebeca3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a>'' should read 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5f5f564d564b597f57595c5e11585049">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3cad1cad7c5e3cbc5c0c28dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jaycobby R. DUKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the U.S. public land survey records      

      January 1, 2000    

The U.S. Public Land Survey (PLS) notebooks are one of the best records of the pre-European settlement landscape and are widely used to recreate presettlement vegetation maps. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative ability of several interpolation techniques to map this vegetation, as sampled by the PLS surveyors, at the landscape level. Field data from Sylvania Wilderness Area, MI (U.S.A.), sampled at the same scale as the PLS data, were used for this test. Sylvania is comprised of a forested landscape similar to that present during presettlement times. Data were analyzed using two Arc/Info interpolation processes and indicator kriging. The resulting maps were compared to a 'correct' map of Sylvania, which was classified from aerial photographs. We found that while the interpolation methods used accurately estimated the relative forest composition of the landscape and the order of dominance of different vegetation types, they were unable to accurately estimate the actual area occupied by each vegetation type. Nor were any of the methods we tested able to recreate the landscape patterns found in the natural landscape. The most likely cause for these inabilities is the scale at which the field data (and hence the PLS data) were recorded. Therefore, these interpolation methods should not be used with the PLS data to recreate pre-European settlement vegetation at small scales (e.g., less than several townships or areas < 104 ha). Recommendations are given for ways to increase the accuracy of these vegetation maps.

## Citation Information
Antwauane BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      May 13, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Samuel ShengSamuel
      ShengChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial and accounting
officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 12547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20307]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard DELGADO-CRUZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1927

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Simulating the evolution of coastal morphology and stratigraphy with a new morphological-behaviour model (GEOMBEST)      

      January 1, 2005    

A new morphological-behaviour model is used to simulate evolution of coastal morphology associated with cross-shore translations of the shoreface, barrier, and estuary. The model encapsulates qualitative principles drawn from established geological concepts that are parameterized to provide quantitative predictions of morphological change on geological time scales (order 10 3 years), as well as shorter time scales applicable for long-term coastal management (order 101 to 102 years). Changes in sea level, and sediment volume within the shoreface, barrier, and estuary, drive the model behaviour. Further parameters, defining substrate erodibility, sediment composition, and time-dependent shoreface response, constrain the evolution of the shoreface towards an equilibrium profile. Results from numerical experiments are presented for the low-gradient autochthonous setting of North Carolina and the steep allochthonous setting of the Washington shelf. Simulations in the Currituck region of North Carolina examined the influence of sediment supply, substrate composition, and substrate erodibility on barrier transgression. Results demonstrate that the presence of a lithified substrate reduces the rate of barrier transgression compared to scenarios where an erodible, sand-rich substrate exists. Simulations of the Washington coast, 20 km north of the Columbia River, confirmed that the model can reproduce complex stratigraphy involving regressive and transgressive phases of coastal evolution. Results suggest that the first major addition of sediment to the shelf occurred around 12 900 years ago and resulted from the rapid addition of sediment volume from the Columbia River attributed to the Missoula floods. This was followed by a period where little or no sediment was added (12 400-9100 BP) and a third period when most sediment was added to the shelf (9100 BP to present) from the Columbia River. Comparing results from each setting demonstrates an indirect control that substrate slope has on shoreface transgression rates. Shoreface transgression is shown to be sensitive to the rate of estuarine sedimentation, with the sensitivity increasing as substrate slope decreases. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Rob Thieler, PhD

##### Center Director

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

rthieler@usgs.gov

508-457-2211

## Related Content

#### Rob Thieler, PhD

##### Center Director

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

rthieler@usgs.gov

508-457-2211

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Carolina

View All **
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Jeffory A. Carlson, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November __, 2022



/s/ Jeffory A. Carlson

Jeffory A. Carlson

Principal Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Lynne Oreschnigg 

Regulatory Compliance Specialist 

Huntsman Corporation 

10003 Woodloch Forest Drive, 

The Woodlands, Texas 77380 

[) FC 1 r- ·,,) ·r - , 0 L U I ] 

Re: Request for extension to submit final reports for developmental toxicity studies for 2-

0xiranemethanamine, N-[ 4-(2-oxiranylmethoxy) phenyl ]-N -(2-oxiranylmethyl )-

(CASRN 5026-74-4). 

Dear Ms. Oreschnigg: 

EPA has received your December 11, 2015, submission on behalf of Huntsman Corporation 

(Huntsman) requesting an extension of time to submit final reports for developmental toxicity 

studies for the chemical substance 2-0xiranemethanamine, N-[4-(2-oxiranylmethoxy) phenyl]-

N-(2-oxiranylmethyl)- (CASRN 5026-74-4). These studies were required pursuant to a test rule 

issued by EPA under section 4 ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act on October 21,2011 (76 FR 

65385) (HPV3). 

Huntsman previously submitted protocols for definitive testing for developmental and 

reproductive effects on November 17, 2014. In its submission, Huntsman also indicated that 

since these definitive tests were lengthier and more complex than the screening level tests set 

forth in the test rule, and required longer deadlines for final reporting, they would need 

additional time to submit the final reports. The submitted study plans and protocols underwent 

extensive review and were approved by EPA, with comments received and noted by Huntsman 

(Final Data Adequacy Review dated December 23, 201 5). EPA also approved the additional 

time needed to conduct this testing. 

Huntsman later submitted to EPA a proposal to use a commercial grade of the test substance for 

the testing. EPA indicated that it was willing to consider use of the commercial grade, but 

required that Huntsman perform a detailed analytical analysis before approval. As noted in your 

request for an extension, both the analysis and EPA's review (and subsequent approval ofthe use 

of the commercial substance) required additional time, resulting in the need for an additional 

extension of time for the developmental toxicity studies. As noted in your request, Huntsman still 

anticipates the required reproductive effects testing to be completed as scheduled. 

EPA is granting the requested extension to submit the final reports for the developmental studies, 

as follows: 

1) preliminary developmental toxicity testing (OECD 414), June 30, 2016; and 

2) definitive developmental toxicity testing (OECD 414), November 30, 2016. 

Internet Address (URL) • http'/fwww epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
The due date for the definitive two-generation reproductive effects testing (OECD 416) remains 

August 31,2017. 

If you have any questions, please contact John Schaeffer by phone, (202) 564-8173 or email, 

schaeffer.john@epa.gov. 

cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

7'celreV 

7 d l~L4--Z__ 

Lorai e Passe 

Chief 

Chemical Information and 

Testing Branch