alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JEFFREY RIOS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:10-cr-00017-PJM-1; 8:11-cv-02238-PJM)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: March 11, 2013

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Jeffrey Rios, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Kenneth Ake, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Rios seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion, which the district court construed as a motion for 

reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Rios 

insists on appeal that his motion, in which he challenges the 

effectiveness of counsel and seeks to have his sentence vacated 

for resentencing, was filed pursuant to § 2255; therefore, we 

review it as such. 

An order denying relief under § 2255 is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rios has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in 

part. 

Although we do not agree with the district court’s 

construction of the entirety of Rios’ motion as one for 

reduction of sentence under § 3582(c)(2), we do agree with the 

court’s reasoning in denying that relief. Therefore, to the 

extent that Rios’ pleading sought relief available pursuant to 

§ 3582(c)(2), we affirm the denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief on the 

reasoning of the district court. Rios v. United States, Nos. 

8:10-cr-00017-PJM-1; 8:11-cv-02238-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2012). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART
### Preflight Checklist

Flight Date: __/__/____ Location ______________

Windspeed: _________ Temperature: _________ Pilot : ___________________ Observer :

________ ___ ____ _______

1. Charge battery and spares

2. Charge camera

3. Charge smartphone

4. Check /charge batteries in radio, turn on/off

5. Check spare radio batteries (non DX8)

1. Set RTH switch to arm

2. Set flight mode switch to A

3. Assemble camera, wireless camera antenna, and gimbal

4. Attach assembled gimbal to drone

5. Connect control wire to gimbal forward position /middle position if DX8

6. Connect battery, close hat ch

7. Place drone nose away from pilot on launch surface

8. Clear launch area of debris

9. Power transmitter

10. Power on drone

11. Check telemetry screens for data on controller

12. Wait for GPS lock (solid green light)

13. Power on camera

14. Power on smartphone control of camera

15. F unction check camera and phone, rotate gimbal, take a picture

1. Clear launch area of spectators

2. Step 5 meters behind drone

3. Visual check of launch area

4. Power on engines

5. Set flight mode to AP

6. Announce launch

7. Check that launch area remains clear

8. Launch to 3 meters

9. Conduct flight

Batteries Used

 Battery 1  Battery 2

 Battery 3  Battery 4

 Battery 5  Battery 6
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Utilizing high-resolution genetic markers to track population-level exposure of migratory birds to renewable energy development              

      December 28, 2023    

With new motivation to increase the proportion of energy demands met by zero-carbon sources, there is a greater focus on efforts to assess and mitigate the impacts of renewable energy development on sensitive ecosystems and wildlife, of which birds are of particular interest. One challenge for researchers, due in part to a lack of appropriate tools, has been estimating the effects from such development on individual breeding populations of migratory birds. To help address this, we utilize a newly developed, high-resolution genetic tagging method to rapidly identify the breeding population of origin of carcasses recovered from renewable energy facilities and combine them with maps of genetic variation across geographic space (called ‘genoscapes’) for five species of migratory birds known to be exposed to energy development, to assess the extent of population-level effects on migratory birds. We demonstrate that most avian remains collected were from the largest populations of a given species. In contrast, those remains from smaller, declining populations made up a smaller percentage of the total number of birds assayed. Results suggest that application of this genetic tagging method can successfully define population-level exposure to renewable energy development and may be a powerful tool to inform future siting and mitigation activities associated with renewable energy programs.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Todd E Katzner

##### Supervisory Research Wildlife Biologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

tkatzner@usgs.gov

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Todd E KatznerSupervisory Research Wildlife BiologistForest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterEmailtkatzner@usgs.gov 

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - Avian
                  - Disturbance
                  - Ecology
                  - Large-Scale Ecology
                  - Sensitive Species
                  - Threats
                  - Tools and Techniques
                  - Energy Development
                  - Migratory Birds
                  - Solar Energy
                  - Wind Energy
                  - Influences of Wind and Solar Energy on Wildlife
                  - Listed Species and Species of Management Concern
                  - Energy and Wildlife
                  - Threats
                  - Wildlife and Terrestrial Species
                  - Avian Movements, Monitoring, and Conservation
                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - Renewable energy
                  - renewable energy and wildlife
                  - Raptors
                  - migratory birds

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           State transportation agencies partner to deploy and enhance ShakeCast      

      October 1, 2018    

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is organizing and leading a three-year Transportation Pooled Fund (TPF) project, Connecting the Dots: Implementing ShakeCast Across Multiple State Departments of Transportation for Rapid Post-Earthquake Response. Ten state Departments of Transportation (DOT)—CA, ID, MO, MS, OK, OR, SC, TX, UT, AND WA—have partnered and combined research funds to pursue implementation and advancement of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) ShakeCast system. ShakeCast is a software application that automatically retrieves ShakeMap shaking estimates and performs analyses using fragility functions for bridges, buildings, and other structures. The ShakeCast system identifies which facilities are most likely impacted by an earthquake and sends notifications to responders in the minutes after an earthquake. By focusing inspection efforts on the most damage-susceptible facilities in the severely shaken areas, ShakeCast can reduce response time and priorities for bridge inspections in the aftermath of a significant earthquake. The goal of the TPF project is to establish or enhance operational ShakeCast instances for all the partner DOTs, while advancing transportation-focused aspects of the software platform. DOTs are uniquely able to take advantage of the ShakeCast technology in that bridge fragilities can be readily derived from the National Bridge Inventory (NBI). DOTs also share the need for prioritized response strategies given their very large numbers of facilities—over wide areas—that have varying vulnerabilities, many of which could potentially be affected by earthquake shaking. The ten-state TPF project will also explore opportunities for DOT-specific ShakeCast software modifications, for example, for enhanced neighboring-state situational awareness and response coordination as well as for long-term maintenance and operations of their ShakeCast systems.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441

## Related Content

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
# L_2005341EN.01000101.xml

| 23.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/1

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2005 — Amending Budget 1

(2005/892/EC)

The detailed amended statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2005 can be consulted on the Agency website: http://www.easa.eu.int/

STATEMENT OF REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Financial year 2005 | AB 2005 | Total 2005 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Fees collected | 37 200 000 | –20 800 000 | 16 400 000 |
| 2 | Subsidy from the Commission | 18 930 000 | 3 207 881 | 22 137 881 |
| 3 | Third country contribution | p.m. | p.m. | p.m. |
| 4 | Others contributions | 1 177 025 | 51 481 | 1 228 506 |
| 5 | Administrative operations | 49 975 | 138 098 | 188 073 |
| 6 | Revenue from services rendered against payment | 117 000 | –90 460 | 26 540 |
| 7 | Correction of budgetary imbalances | p.m. | p.m. | p.m. |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 57 474 000 | –17 493 000 | 39 981 000 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Financial year 2005

AB 2005

Total 2005

1

Fees collected

37 200 000

–20 800 000

16 400 000

2

Subsidy from the Commission

18 930 000

3 207 881

22 137 881

3

Third country contribution

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

4

Others contributions

1 177 025

51 481

1 228 506

5

Administrative operations

49 975

138 098

188 073

6

Revenue from services rendered against payment

117 000

–90 460

26 540

7

Correction of budgetary imbalances

p.m.

p.m.

p.m.

GRAND TOTAL

57 474 000

57 474 000

–17 493 000

–17 493 000

39 981 000

39 981 000

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Financial year 2005 | AB 2005 | Total 2005 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Staff and related expenditures | 18 250 000 | –2 061 000 | 16 189 000 |
| 2 | Buildings, equipment and miscellaneous operating expenditure | 4 202 000 | – 584 000 | 3 618 000 |
| 3 | Operational expenditure | 35 022 000 | –14 848 000 | 20 174 000 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 57 474 000 | –17 493 000 | 39 981 000 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Financial year 2005

AB 2005

Total 2005

1

Staff and related expenditures

18 250 000

–2 061 000

16 189 000

2

Buildings, equipment and miscellaneous operating expenditure

4 202 000

– 584 000

3 618 000

3

Operational expenditure

35 022 000

–14 848 000

20 174 000

GRAND TOTAL

57 474 000

57 474 000

–17 493 000

–17 493 000

39 981 000

39 981 000

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 66179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-21217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 808

[Docket No. 97N-0222]


Medical Devices; Preemption of State Product Liability Claims

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-32551, beginning on page 65384, in the 
issue of Friday, December 12, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 65388, in the first column, under VI. Reguest for Comments, 
in the second line, ``(insert date 60 days after date of publication in 
the Federal Register)'' should read ``February 10, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Summary of the final report from the Ice and Climate Evolution Science Analysis group (ICE-SAG)      

      April 30, 2021    

The Ice and Climate Evolution Science Analysis Group (ICE-SAG) was convened by the Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) in fall 2018, with the aims of (1) identifying and prioritizing fundamental science questions related to the recent and ongoing evolution of Mars volatiles and climate, and (2) exploring new mission approaches that could address these high-priority science questions during the coming decade (2023–2032). In this white paper, we summarize the ICE-SAG final report via a selection of report materials and provide broad context for the content of this MEPAG-generated report (which is likely a reference mentioned within a number of other, community-based white papers).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Colin Dundas, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

cdundas@usgs.gov

928-556-7143

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Colin Dundas, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

cdundas@usgs.gov

928-556-7143

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
Form CGFCRD3 (7/14/2020)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−21421−MAM

Chapter: 11

In re:

Vrai Tabernacle de Jesus, Inc.

aka Vrai Tabernackle of Jesus Christ, Inc., fka True Tabernacle of Jesus

Christ, Inc.

1656 S Congress Ave.

West Palm Beach, FL 33406

EIN: 45−3840218

NOTICE OF CONTINUED HEARING

Per Hearing Held 12/01/2020

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Mindy A Mora

on December 15, 2020 at 01:30 PM,

by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions LLC.

To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

**EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY** Until further notice or unless directed otherwise, the court will ONLY hold

hearings by TELEPHONE. Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic

services FREE of charge. All attorneys shall advise their clients NOT to appear at the courthouse.

to consider the following:

Motion to Dismiss Case Filed by Creditor E&Y Assets, LLC (20)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service as to the extent required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and

9073−1(B). Any party who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the

opportunity to be heard thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 12/2/20 CLERK OF COURT

Case 20-21421-MAM Doc 46 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2
By: Maria Romaguera−Serfaty

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-21421-MAM Doc 46 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 2
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2013 - 0363 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM031AD

A3 3 0 - 34 - 3293 --- 1/31/13 A340 - 34 - 4273 --- 1/30/13 A340 - 34 - 5093 --- 1/30/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# L_2005160EN.01002501.xml

| 23.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/25

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 13 June 2005

appointing a Member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2005/454/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2002/758/EC, Euratom of 17 September 2002 appointing the Members of the Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2002 to 20 September 2006 (1),

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the French Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

A Member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Noël DUPUY, of which the Council was informed on 2 February 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Bruno CLERGEOT is hereby appointed a Member of the European Economic and Social Committee in place of Mr Noël DUPUY for the remainder of the latter’s term of office, which ends on 20 September 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 13 June 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 253, 21.9.2002, p. 9.

1

---
SCWC-11-0000760

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MICHAEL ROBLES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000760; CR. NO. 10-1-1469)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michael Robles’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on February 24, 2013, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 4, 2013.

William H. Jameson, Jr.,

for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000760

04-APR-2013

09:32 AM
Exhibit 10.3










AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”),
effective as of March 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), hereby amends the Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2010, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated November 3, 2010 (the “Agreement”), by and between AmTrust
Financial Services, Inc., 59 Maiden Lane, 6th floor, New York, New York, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
and Christopher M. Longo, an individual residing at 625 Club Drive, Aurora, OH 44202 (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the purpose of this Amendment
is for the Executive and the Company to agree to an extension of the Employment Period to February 28, 2015.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree
as follows:


 


	Section 2 (Employment Period) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 2 in its entirety
and replacing it with the following:

 


2.Employment Period. For a period commencing
on the Effective Date hereof and ending on February 28, 2015 (the “Employment Period”), the Company hereby employs
Executive in the capacities herein set forth. Executive agrees, pursuant to the terms hereof, to serve in such capacities for the
Employment Period. This Agreement shall renew for successive three-year periods (“Successive Employment Periods”) unless
one of the parties provides written notice to the other more than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the Employment Period or
any Successive Employment Period that the party will not renew the Agreement. The Employment Period and any Successive Employment
Period(s) shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Employment Period.”


 


	All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with their terms.

 


 








AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


 


 











	By: /s/ Stephen Ungar	 	 	Date: March 1, 2012
	Name: Stephen Ungar	 	 	 
	Title:General Counsel and Secretary	 	 	 







  


 


EXECUTIVE 


 





	/s/ Christopher M. Longo.	 	 	Date: February 24, 2012
	Christopher M. Longo
Javaris WARDLOW, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2118

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.