__________ ___________

 Judge Kenneth Barr presided over defe ndant’s hearing on his plea. Judge Steve Malone presided over defendant’ s motion to withdraw his plea.

1 Filed 4/2/15 P. v. Rios CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELL ATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. THEODORE RIOS, Defendant and Appellant. E062017 (Super.Ct.No. FSB1304641) OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Kenneth Barr and Steve Malone, Judges.  Affirmed. Lewis A. Wenzell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.2 I STATEMENT OF THE CASE On October 24, 2013, a felony compla int charged defendant and appellant Theodore Rios and co-defendant Michae l Ramirez with violating Penal Code 1 section 530.5, subdivision (c)(3), willfully and unla wfully acquiring a nd possessing with an intent to defraud the personal id entifying information of 10 or more other persons. The complaint also alleged a gang enhancement under section 186.22, su bdivision (b)(1)(A). The complaint further alleged that defendant had suffered a prior strike under sections 1170.12, subdivisions (a) th rough (d) and 667, subdivision (b); a serious felony prior under section 667, subdivisio n (a)(1); and a one-year pris on prior under section 667.5. On December 12, 2013, de fendant pled guilty to c ount 1 and admitted the oneyear prison prior. The parties agreed that defe ndant would be sentenced to a total of four years, the upper term of three years on count 1 and one year for the prison prior to be served consecutively, w ith the remainder of the complaint to be dismissed. The parties stipulated that the police reports could be read and considered as the factual basis for the plea. On September 4, 2014, the trial court heard and denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. On the same day, the co urt sentenced defendant pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement to fo ur years in state prison.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless specified otherwise.3 On September 25, 2014, defendant filed a notice of appeal challenging the validity of the plea, and based on the sentence or other matters occurring after the plea. Defendant requested a certificate of probable cause; the trial court denied his request.
II STATEMENT OF FACTS On October 23, 2013, a police officer c ontacted a car driven by defendant. The officer knew defendant was on parole and conduc ted a parole search. The officer found a bag containing copies of checks, identificati on cards, and other forms of identification belonging to more than 100 individuals. Subsequently, numerous victims were contacted. They confirmed that th e seized items had been stolen.
III ANALYSIS After defendant appealed, and upon his re quest, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has file d a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 se tting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the f acts, and potential arguable issu es, and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record. We offered defendant an op portunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal. 4th 106, we have conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.4 IV DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER J.
We concur:

RAMIREZ P. J.

KING J.