## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seismic wave propagation and basin amplification in the Wasatch Front, Utah      

      May 26, 2021    

Ground‐motion analysis of more than 3000 records from 59 earthquakes, including records from the March 2020 Mw">Mw 5.7 Magna earthquake sequence, was carried out to investigate site response and basin amplification in the Wasatch Front, Utah. We compare ground motions with the Bayless and Abrahamson (2019; hereafter, BA18) ground‐motion model (GMM) for Fourier amplitude spectra, which was developed on crustal earthquake records from California and other tectonically active regions. The Wasatch Front records show a significantly different near‐source rate of distance attenuation than the BA18 model, which we attribute to differences in (apparent) geometric attenuation. Near‐source residuals show a period dependence of this effect, with greater attenuation at shorter periods (⁠T<0.5  s">T<0.5  s) and a correlation between period and the distance over which the discrepancy manifests (⁠∼20–50  km">∼20–50  km⁠). We adjusted the recorded ground motions for these regional path effects and solved for station site terms using linear mixed‐effects regressions, with groupings for events and stations. We analyzed basin amplification by comparing the site terms with the basin geometry and basin depths from two seismic‐velocity models for the region. Sites over the deeper parts of the sedimentary basins are amplified by factors of 3–10, relative to sites with thin sedimentary cover, with greater amplification at longer periods (⁠T≳1  s">T≳1  s). Average ground‐motion variability increases with period, and long‐period variability exhibits a slight increase at the basin edges. These results indicate regional seismic wave propagation effects requiring further study, and potentially a regionalized GMM, as well as highlight basin amplification complexities that may be incorporated into seismic hazard assessments.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

May 5, 2021

####                 Ground motion Fourier and response spectra from Utah earthquakes, 2010--2020              

Natural Hazards Mission Area, Earthquake Hazards Program, Geologic Hazards Science Center

#### Morgan P Moschetti, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

mmoschetti@usgs.gov

303-273-8464

#### Eric M Thompson

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

emthompson@usgs.gov

303-273-8562

####             Emily Wolin, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Supervisory Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

#### Oliver S Boyd, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

olboyd@usgs.gov

303-273-8617

## Related Content

May 5, 2021

####                 Ground motion Fourier and response spectra from Utah earthquakes, 2010--2020              

Natural Hazards Mission Area, Earthquake Hazards Program, Geologic Hazards Science Center

#### Morgan P Moschetti, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

mmoschetti@usgs.gov

303-273-8464

#### Eric M Thompson

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

emthompson@usgs.gov

303-273-8562

####             Emily Wolin, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Supervisory Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

#### Oliver S Boyd, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

olboyd@usgs.gov

303-273-8617

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Wasatch Front
                  - Utah

View All **