alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Significance of northeast-trending features in Canada Basin, Arctic Ocean      

      November 1, 2017    

Synthesis of seismic velocity, potential field, and geological data from Canada Basin and its surrounding continental margins suggests that a northeast-trending structural fabric has influenced the origin, evolution, and current tectonics of the basin. This structural fabric has a crustal origin, based on the persistence of these trends in upward continuation of total magnetic intensity data and vertical derivative analysis of free-air gravity data. Three subparallel northeast-trending features are described. Northwind Escarpment, bounding the east side of the Chukchi Borderland, extends ∼600 km and separates continental crust of Northwind Ridge from high-velocity transitional crust in Canada Basin. A second, shorter northeast-trending zone extends ∼300 km in northern Canada Basin and separates inferred continental crust of Sever Spur from magmatically intruded crust of the High Arctic Large Igneous Province. A third northeast-trending feature, here called the Alaska-Prince Patrick magnetic lineament (APPL) is inferred from magnetic data and its larger regional geologic setting. Analysis of these three features suggests strike slip or transtensional deformation played a role in the opening of Canada Basin. These features can be explained by initial Jurassic-Early Cretaceous strike slip deformation (phase 1) followed in the Early Cretaceous (∼134 to ∼124 Ma) by rotation of Arctic Alaska with seafloor spreading orthogonal to the fossil spreading axis preserved in the central Canada Basin (phase 2). In this model, the Chukchi Borderland is part of Arctic Alaska.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Deborah R Hutchinson, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

dhutchinson@usgs.gov

508-457-2263

#### David W. Houseknecht

##### Senior Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

dhouse@usgs.gov

703-648-6466

## Related Content

#### Deborah R Hutchinson, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

dhutchinson@usgs.gov

508-457-2263

#### David W. Houseknecht

##### Senior Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

dhouse@usgs.gov

703-648-6466

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - canada
                  -  United States
                  - canada basin
                  - Alaska
                  -  Northwest Territories
                  -  Yukon Territory

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landslides and related features, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia -- Northern half of Jenkins 1° x 2° sheet      

      January 1, 1982    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Jenkins 1° x 2° sheet
                  - Kentucky
                  -  Virginia
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 61167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-11114]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 61167]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. TB-97-15]


Notice of Request for Extension and Revision of a Currently 
Approved Information Collection

Correction

    In notice document 97-29314 appearing on page 59846, in the issue 
of Wednesday, November 5, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 59846, in the first column, in the DATES section, in the 
second line, ``January 5, 1997'' should read ``January 5, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Jorge L Quiros 21-11779 LMI 3/25/21 Photo ID/SS card - Legible/Unredacted Missing 2016(B) IVL Valuation motion not filed ✔

✔ US Dept #3 Pennymac #13 ✔

Affidavit of support LF 90 LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity Missing signed copy of the Attorney's Declaration

Case 21-11779-LMI Doc 23 Filed 04/15/21 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,499
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         129,795
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,877
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,710
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,587
<LOANS>                                        145,521
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,773
<DEPOSITS>                                     158,132
<SHORT-TERM>                                       351
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,333
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,585
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 175,773
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,042
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  783
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,825
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,281
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,544
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      385
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,451
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,451
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,551
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.23
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,809
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,018
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   992
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       72
<RECOVERIES>                                        22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,327
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,327
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: GERARDO ARIAS CASE NUMBER: 19-26046-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for August 31, 2021 hearing. All amendments and documents for the August 31, 2021 

hearing were due as of August 13, 2021. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service and agrees on the record:

Continue to 9/28:

Due on or before 5pm on 9/10: 1) Provide amended non-homestead information sheets-documentation provided 

is not complete (non-homestead information sheets are incomplete), 2) Debtor pays expenses for non-homestead 

(8233?), 3) Provide lease/rental agreement for 18440 property

*Trustee objects to retaining non-homestead properties without sufficient rental income to maintain the nonhomestead properties*

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 180 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Stability and uncertainty of finite-fault slip inversions: Application to the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake      

      January 1, 2007    

The 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake is used to investigate stability and uncertainty aspects of the finite-fault slip inversion problem with different a priori model assumptions. We utilize records from 54 strong ground motion stations and 13 continuous, 1-Hz sampled, geodetic instruments. Two inversion procedures are compared: a linear least-squares subfault-based methodology and a nonlinear global search algorithm. These two methods encompass a wide range of the different approaches that have been used to solve the finite-fault slip inversion problem. For the Parkfield earthquake and the inversion of velocity or displacement waveforms, near-surface related site response (top 100 m, frequencies above 1 Hz) is shown to not significantly affect the solution. Results are also insensitive to selection of slip rate functions with similar duration and to subfault size if proper stabilizing constraints are used. The linear and nonlinear formulations yield consistent results when the same limitations in model parameters are in place and the same inversion norm is used. However, the solution is sensitive to the choice of inversion norm, the bounds on model parameters, such as rake and rupture velocity, and the size of the model fault plane. The geodetic data set for Parkfield gives a slip distribution different from that of the strong-motion data, which may be due to the spatial limitation of the geodetic stations and the bandlimited nature of the strong-motion data. Cross validation and the bootstrap method are used to set limits on the upper bound for rupture velocity and to derive mean slip models and standard deviations in model parameters. This analysis shows that slip on the northwestern half of the Parkfield rupture plane from the inversion of strong-motion data is model dependent and has a greater uncertainty than slip near the hypocenter.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION



     By  signing  below,  each  of the  undersigned  officers  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information  contained in this report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of City Savings Financial Corporation.



Signed this 29th day of September, 2003.





/s/ Thomas F. Swirski                       /s/ George L. Koehm
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Thomas F. Swirski                           George L. Koehm
President and Chief Executive Officer       Treasurer











A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to City Savings Financial Corporation
and will be retained by City Savings Financial  Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
July 18, 20.14 

Memorandum 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

July 18, 2014 Phone Call between the Fond duLac Band of Lake 

Superior Chippewa and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Outreach 

Chris Stoneman, 

and Information 

Policy Advisor 

Division, 

{k_ ~ 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 

Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the main discussion 

points made at the subject phone call during the comment period for the proposed 

rule: "General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source 

Review Program in Indian Country." (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014) 

Phone call details: 

When: Afternoon ofJuly 18, 2014 

Participants: Chris Stoneman, EPA, OAQPS 

Joy Wiecks, Fond duLac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 

The Fond du Lac representative explained what boilers and engines are present on 

the Fond du Lac reservation and asked several clarifying questions about the 

standards in the compression ignition engines draft general permit. The EPA 

answered those questions. The EPA also referred the Fond duLac representative to 

an EPA Region 9 permitting expert for assistance on more detailed questions 

relating to EPA-codified engine standards. The EPA offered to be available ifthe 

Fond du Lac representative had any further questions. 

This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the proposed rule and will be 

available for public review.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0221

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR., 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 20, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 13 2021

08/13/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0221
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Simulation studies of flow and sediment transport using a mathematical model, Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana      

      January 1, 1977    

View Document

Simulation studies were made of flow and sediment transport for the Atchafalaya River basin, Louisiana using a mathematical model calibrated and supplied by the Hydrologic Engineering Center and the New Orleans District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The study results are based on three, 50-year computer simulations for the following alternatives: (1) no-action alternative, (2) channelization with a center-channel flow area of 80,000 sq ft, and (3) channelization with a center-channel flow area of 100,000 sq ft. Analyses of the simulated data base for depth-frequency, inundated-area, floodway cross-section and water-surface profile relationships were made for 10 flow rates. The analyses indicate a general trend of aggradation in the lower part of the floodway with a consequent trend toward increasing the inundated area, especially at higher flood flows.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Atchafalaya River Basin
                  - Louisiana

View All **
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1393** 

JENNIFER L. WILSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SUNTRUST BANK, Incorporated in Georgia; SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC.; RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, f/k/a Residential F unding Corporation , Defendants

– Appellees,
and
HUTCHENS, SENTER, BRITTON, PA; JOHN/JANE DOE 1

- 10 , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00580

- FDW

- DSC )

Submitted : July 30, 2012 Decided: August 13, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jennifer L. Wilson , Appellant Pro Se. Julia Bright Hartley , Christina Rampey Hunoval , NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP , Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Jennifer L. Wilson seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing her claims as to some, but not all, of
the Defendants in her civil action

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. C iv. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Wilson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
M & Y PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BAYAN GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1627

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 8,2005

 

 
|   |   | BY:    | /S/  DAVID  B. GOULD                                     | * * |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
|   |   |   | David B. Gould*Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Dated: August 8, 2005

 

 
|   |   | BY:    | /S/  WILLIAM  F. EVANS          | * * |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|----------|
|   |   |   | William F. Evans*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to WitnessSystems, Inc. and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----