Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Notices 19045 

3 If the above-named company does not qualify 

for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain 

Preserved Mushrooms from the People’s Republic 

of China who have not qualified for a separate rate 

are deemed to be covered by this review as part of 

the single PRC entity of which the named exporters 

are a part. Also, this case was inadvertently omitted 

from the initiation notice that published on March 

24, 2009 (74 FR 12310). 

4 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China who have not qualified for a 

separate rate are deemed to be covered by this 

review as part of the single PRC entity of which the 

named exporters are a part. 

5 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Glycine from the People’s Republic of China who 

have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to 

be covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 

6 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People’s 

Republic of China who have not qualified for a 

separate rate are deemed to be covered by this 

review as part of the single PRC entity of which the 

named exporters are a part. 

1Timken US Corporation is currently known as 

the Timken Company. 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures (73 FR 3634). Those 

procedures apply to administrative 

reviews included in this notice of 

initiation. Parties wishing to participate 

in any of these administrative reviews 

should ensure that they meet the 

requirements of these procedures (e.g., 

the filing of separate letters of 

appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 

351.103(d)). 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 1765(a)), and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: April 21, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–9587 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–801] 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From 

Germany: Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review Pursuant to a Court Decision 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 29, 2007, the United 

States Court of International Trade (CIT) 

affirmed the redetermination of the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) on voluntary remand of the 

final results of the administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from 

Germany. See Paul Mu ̈ ller Industrie 

GmbH & Co. v. United States, 502 F. 

Supp. 2d 1271 (CIT 2007). The 

Department is amending the final 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from 

Germany covering the period of review 

May 1, 2002, through April 30, 2003, to 

reflect the CIT’s order. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5760 or (202) 482– 

4477, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 15, 2004, the 

Department published the final results 

of the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof from Germany for the 

period May 1, 2002, through April 30, 

2003. See Antifriction Bearings and 

Parts Thereof From France, et al.: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Rescission of 

Administrative Reviews in Part, and 

Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 

69 FR 55574 (September 15, 2004) 

(Final Results). The Final Results were 

amended in Ball Bearings and Parts 

Thereof From Germany; Amended Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 69 FR 63507 

(November 2, 2004) (Amended Final 

Results). 

Paul Mu ̈ller Industrie GmbH & Co. 

(Paul Mu ̈ller) and Timken US 

Corporation1 filed lawsuits challenging 

the Final Results as amended by the 

Amended Final Results. The 

Department requested a voluntary 

remand on two issues. On May 26, 2006, 

the CIT granted the Department’s 

request and ordered the Department to 

correct a ministerial error involving a 

billing adjustment reported by Paul 

Mu ̈ller for one home–market 

transaction, and to recalculate its 

antidumping margin accordingly, and 

explain its treatment of Paul Mu ̈ller’s 

inventory carrying costs. See Paul 

Mu ̈ ller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United 

States, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1241, 1246–47 

(CIT 2006) (Paul Mu ̈ ller 2006) 

In accordance with the CIT’s remand 

order in Paul Mu ̈ ller 2006, the 

Department filed its redetermination on 

remand of the final results (remand 

results) on September 13, 2006. In its 

remand results, the Department 

corrected the ministerial error and made 

a change to its treatment of the 

inventory carrying costs to ensure that 

home–market and U.S. inventory 

carrying costs were calculated on a 

consistent basis. On June 29, 2007, the 

CIT affirmed the Department’s remand 

results. See Paul Mu ̈ ller Industrie GmbH 

& Co. v. United States, 502 F. Supp. 2d 

1271 (CIT 2007). 

Amended Final Results of the Review 

Based on the remand results, we are 

amending the weighted–average margin 

for Paul Mu ̈ller for the period May 1, 

2002, through April 30, 2003, from 0.44 

percent to 0.46 percent. 

Assessment of Duties 

The Department has determined, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by these 

amended final results. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
19046 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Notices 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO as explained in 

the APO itself. See 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

amended final results of administrative 

review in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended. 

Dated: April 21, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–9524 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 2007–2008 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Frances Veith or Brendan Quinn, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4295 or (202) 482– 

5848, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 30, 2008, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on tapered 

roller bearings and parts thereof, 

finished or unfinished (‘‘TRBs’’), from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 

for the period June 1, 2007 through May 

31, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Request for Revocation in Part, 

and Deferral of Administrative Review, 

73 FR 44220 (July 30, 2008). On 

February 19, 2009, the Department 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register extending the time limit for the 

preliminary results of review by 90 

days, until June 1, 2009. See Tapered 

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished or Unfinished, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Time Limit for the Preliminary Results 

of the 2007–2008 Administrative Review 

of the Antidumping Duty Order, 74 FR 

7661 (February 19, 2009). 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review within 245 days 

after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested and a final determination 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within these time 

periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary 

determination to a maximum of 365 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review within the current extended 

time limit because the Department 

requires additional time to analyze the 

supplemental questionnaire responses 

and issue additional supplemental 

questionnaires, if necessary. Therefore, 

the Department is extending the time 

limit for completion of the preliminary 

results by an additional 30 days. Thus, 

the preliminary results of this review 

are being fully extended by 120 days 

from the original deadline of March 2, 

2009, which results in a new deadline 

of June 30, 2009. The final results 

continue to be due 120 days after the 

publication of the preliminary results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 21, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–9562 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–836] 

Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon–Quality 

Steel Plate Products From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 19, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

cut–to-length carbon–quality steel plate 

products (steel plate) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea). The period of review 

is February 1, 2007, through January 31, 

2008. We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

preliminary results. Based on our 

analysis of the comments received and 

an examination of our calculations, we 

have made changes for the final results. 

The final weighted–average dumping 

margin is listed below in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyn 

Johnson or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–5287 and (202) 

482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 19, 2008, the 

Department published Certain Cut–toLength Carbon–Quality Steel Plate 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 

77614 (December 19, 2008) (Preliminary 

Results), in the Federal Register. The 

administrative review covers one 

producer of the subject merchandise, 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM). 

We invited parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. We received case 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES