alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2  Certification by the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of UPM-Kymmene Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of UPM-Kymmene Corporation (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jyrki Salo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2)the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.   Date: March 15, 2007   /s/ JYRKI
  SALOJyrki Salo 
  Executive Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this certification required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

RE: Arminda Cespedes Case Number 20-20169-RAM 

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this deficiency

is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE RECEIVED

BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION

HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely filed/received by the trustee

may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this case. Call the Trustee's case

administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee reserves the right to raise additional

objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and reviewed for possible issues raised and

additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the Trustee. 

The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. The Court may

dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for April 13, 2021 hearing. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to

"re-sending" documents) REVIEWED DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY 3/31/2021

CASE PENDING OVER 6 MONTHS: BAR DATE: 11/27 (LF 76 not filed)

3A Plan served 2/25 

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 5/11:

Due on or before 5pm on 4/15 a) Amend section II. B. atty fees balance due higher than amount paid in plan, b) -

Amend section III. B. to check "none" box

If amended plan filed prior to April 7 correcting typo, trustee review confirm or continue

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

Case 20-20169-RAM Doc 61 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 of Case
Financial, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that, to
their knowledge, the information contained in such periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Eric A. Alden
-------------------------------
Eric A. Alden,
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Steven D. Gershick
-------------------------------
Steven D. Gershick,
Acting Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  August 19, 2002
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned officers of OpenTV Corp. certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective
knowledge:

(1) this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of OpenTV Corp.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                         
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Nigel W. Bennett
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Nigel W. Bennett Chief Executive
Officer



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Shum Mukherjee
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Shum Mukherjee Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been
provided to OpenTV Corp. and will be retained by OpenTV Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Remagnetization and northward coastwise transport of Franciscan Complex rocks, northern California: a reinterpretation of the paleomagnetic data      

      January 1, 1990    

Previous paleomagnetic studies of accreted oceanic rocks within the Franciscan Complex of northern California have concluded that these rocks originated far to the south of their present positions with respect to the North American continent. However, the plate motions implied by some of these paleomagnetic data are problematic (e.g., exceptional plate velocities), and uniform-polarity magnetizations in almost all of these rocks indicate the possibility of remagnetization. In this paper, Franciscan rocks in northern California are reinterpreted as having been remagnetized prior to accretion-related deformation. Paleolatitudes of subduction and remagnetization in the northern hemisphere (12?? to 33??) appear to be inversely proportional to age of accretion (middle Cretaceous to Oligocene) for the Franciscan rocks. Subsequent northward displacements (800 to 3700 km) and clockwise rotations (56?? and 154??) of these rocks inferred from the paleomagnetic data are consistent with potential displacements along the western margin of North America during late Mesozoic and Cenozoic time calculated using examples of modern subduction zones and current plate reconstruction models. -from Author

## Citation Information
EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form  S-8  (File  Nos.  333-123184  and  333-115649)  and  Form  S-3  (File  No.
333-120146) of NATIONAL COAL CORP. of our report dated February 11, 2005 (except
as to the last  four  paragraphs  of Note #9,  which  date is March  29,  2005),
included in this  Amendment  No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of NATIONAL
COAL CORP. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.



/S/ GORDON, HUGHES & BANKS, LLP
-------------------------------
Gordon, Hughes & Banks, LLP

Greenwood Village, Colorado
December 27, 2005
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Mezzanine Investment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  May 17, 2004

/s/ Eric C. Bronk
Eric C. Bronk, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
Addendum to Docket No. FAA-2015-5704

From: Aerial Vista (Toby Lankford) 

921 Rabbit Run Amarillo, TX 79124

806-517-8234 tlankford01@gmail.com

Date: 1/3/16

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket,Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:

In response to the email dated January 3, 2016, The following information is provided.

The type of aircraft being operated will be as follows with the total maximum take off weights including 

all payloads (i.e. cameras and batteries).

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Quad rotor aircraft Total maximum take off weight of 2.7lbs

DJI Phantom 3 Pro Quad rotor aircraft Total maximum take off weight of 2.7lbs

DJI Inspire 1 Quad rotor aircraft Total maximum take off weight of 6.5lbs

DJI Inspire 1 PRO Quad rotor aircraft Total maximum take off weight of 6.7lbs

DJI Spread Wings S900 Hex rotor aircraft Total Maximum take off weight of 18.1lbs

DJI Spread Wings S1000 Octo rotor Aircraft Total Maximum take off weight of 24.25lbs

RVJET Fixed Wing PixHawk Flight Controller Total Maximum take-off weight of 6.2lbs
As noted above, ALL aircraft fall well below the 55lbs weight maximum and have all been approved in 

prior awarded exemption request. 

Aerial Vista

921 Rabbit Run Amarillo, TX 79124

Toby Lankford

806-517-8234

tlankford01@gmail.com
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case Number: 2 \-JOT-/ 3 

Chapter 13 

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO EXEMPTIONS 

AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING 

Nancy K. Neidich, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, files this Objection to Exemptions as 

the Trustee objects to the exemption of property as stated in the debtor(s)' Schedules as being 

over the legal limit and/or raising a question as to the amount of the claimed exemption and 

therefore it does not appear that the debtors are entitled to same and therefore excessive or 

inappropriate exemptions should be stricken and disallowed. Objecting specifically as checked: 

__ a) Homestead property which is multi-family (duplex) or not actually used as homestead. 

__ b) Personal property exempted over $1000 with or $5000 without Homestead exemption . 

.. ,.,. __ c) Tenants By the Entireties, evidence of joint title and motion served on all creditors 

with a statement of which property is jointly held . and requiring objection from any joint 

creditor 

d) Bare Legal Title, evidence that the debtor has never contributed to the payment, 

maintenance, or use. (or that there is no equity in the property for the estate) 

__ e) Vague exemption in the amount stated, description of asset, or citation of exemption. 

__ f) Wages, evidence of head of family (ifjoint case need specific debtor claiming 

exemption) and 6 months bank statements with deposits traced. 

__ g) Automobile exemption of $1000.00 is split between more than one automobile. 

_h) Valuation Issues: the debtor did not timely provide the Trustee with requested 

valuation, including but not limited to bank statements, real property or vehicles. 

/ i) Proof of pension or 401K statement or annuity 

_j) Use of improper application of exemption: residency 522(b )(3), not eligible 

for exemption 

__ k)Other 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing and the Notice of 

Hearing generated by the Clerk of the Court was served through ECF on debtor's attorney on 

the same day as the objection is filed with the Clerk of the Court. 

Submitted by 

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE 

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 441856 

P.O. BOX 279806 

MIRAMAR, FL 33027 

(954) 4 4 3 -4402 

Case 21-10748-AJC Doc 19 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 1
Rhondel PARIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

Rhondel Paris, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LAGOA and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40417]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 30, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-50730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 112

[CGD 94-108]


Electrical Engineering Requirements for Merchant Vessels

Correction

    In rule document 96-13416, beginning on page 28260, in the issue of 
Tuesday, June 4, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 112.55-15  [Corrected]

    On page 28288, in the first column, under amendatory instruction 
170, in Sec. 112.5-15 (a)(3), in the third line, ``prescribed in 
Sec. 12.05-5(a)'' should read ``prescribed in Sec. 112.05-5(a)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-24331-BKC-JKO 

 CHAPTER 13 

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. 

__________________________/ 

DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF AUTOMATIC STAY

(Expedited hearing requested) 

 COMES NOW the Debtor, RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR., by and through his undersigned 

attorney, files this Motion for Continuance of the Automatic Stay, and in support thereof states: 

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant 28 U.S.C. Sections 1334(b), 

157(a), and 362(d) of Title 11, United States Code. Furthermore, this is a core proceeding 

pursuant 28 USC Section 157(b)(2)(G). 

2. The Debtor has a pending Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in the Southern District of Florida. 

3. The Debtor had one prior case within the preceding one-year period. 

4. The Debtor wishes to attempt to save his home. In addition, he has a large pending 

homeowner’s insurance claim which he intends to use for the home. 

5. The Debtor believes these circumstances make this second filing appropriate at this 

time. 

 WHEREFORE, the Debtor requests this Court enter an Order Continuing the Automatic 

Stay through completion of the Chapter 13 Plan, and to extend to all creditors. 

Dated: October 26, 2019 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL H. JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Debtor(s) 

3601 W. Commercial Blvd, Ste 31 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

(954) 535-1131 

By:_/s/ Michael H. Johnson_____ 

 Michael H. Johnson 

 Florida Bar No. 0149543 

 

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA AND I AM IN 

COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 

TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT SET FORTH IN LOCAL 

RULE 2090-1(A).

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 4 Filed 10/26/19 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60887

Summary Calendar

 

NAZARETH GATES, Et Al., 

 

 Plaintiffs,

 

versus 

 

JOHN COLLIER, Et Al., 

 

 Defendants.

 

--------------------------------------------

PHILLIP MARCUS CARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT L. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Et Al., 

 

 Defendants, 

 

RAYMOND LANKFORD, Director Chaplaincy Services;

MAUD IRBY, Warden, Area III; R. L. RHODES, 

Unit Administrator, 

 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 01-CV-115-P-A

USDC No. 71-CV-6-JAD

--------------------
No. 02-60887

-2-

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Phillip Marcus Carter, Mississippi prisoner # 04491, filed

the instant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several employees

of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) seeking

reinstatement of prayer services in his unit. The district court

dismissed his complaint with prejudice in a judgment entered on

May 20, 2002. Carter did not file his notice of appeal until

October 9, 2002. It was therefore untimely, and, as a result,

this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. FED. R. APP. P.

4(a)(1); Dison v. Whitley, 20 F.3d 185, 186 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Carter’s postjudgment “motion for record and transcripts”

which he purports to have mailed on June 4, 2002, does not

qualify as a FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) or 60(a) or (b) motion that

would have suspended the appeal period. See FED. R. APP. P.

4(a)(4)(A); Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.,

784 F.2d 665, 667-68 (5th Cir. 1986) (en banc); Huff v. Int’l

Longshoremen’s Ass’n, Local No. 24, 799 F.2d 1087, 1089-90 (5th

Cir. 1986).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           River channel response to invasive plant treatment across the American Southwest      

      October 21, 2022    

Invasive riparian plants were introduced to the American Southwest in the early 19th century and contributed to regional trends of decreasing river channel width and migration rate in the 20th century. More recently, efforts to remove invasive riparian vegetation (IRV) have been widespread, especially since 1990. To what extent has IRV treatment reversed the earlier trend of channel narrowing and reduced dynamism? In this study, paired treated and untreated reaches at 15 sites along 13 rivers were compared before and after IRV treatment using repeat aerial imagery to assess long-term (~10-year) channel change due to treatment on a regional scale across the Southwest USA. We found that IRV treatment significantly increased channel width and floodplain destruction. Treated reaches had higher floodplain destruction than untreated reaches at 14 of 15 sites, and IRV treatment increased the rate of floodplain destruction by a median factor of 1.9. The effect of treatment increased with the stream power of the largest flow over the study period. Resolving observations of channel change into separate measures of floodplain destruction and formation provided more information on underlying processes than simple measurements of channel width and centerline migration rate. Restoration practitioners who perform IRV treatment projects often focus on wildlife or vegetation response; however, geomorphic processes should be considered in restoration planning because they drive aquatic habitat and vegetation dynamics, and because of the potential for damage to downstream infrastructure. Depending on the restoration goal, management practices can be used to enhance or minimize the increase in channel dynamism caused by IRV treatment.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jonathan Friedman, PhD

##### Research Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

friedmanj@usgs.gov

303-541-3017

## Related Content

#### Jonathan Friedman, PhD

##### Research Hydrologist

Fort Collins Science Center

friedmanj@usgs.gov

303-541-3017

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Colorado
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Nathaniel Energy Corporation ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the dater hereof (the "Report"),
I James Woodley, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            Nathaniel Energy Corporation




Date: August 19, 2003                       By: /s/ James C. Woodley
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name: James C. Woodley
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                            Nathaniel Energy Corporation