alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EWRX
INTERNET SYSTEMS, INC. (the Company ) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report
), I, Jessica Q. Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the disclosure of
deficiencies in the Companys disclosure controls and procedures set forth in
Item 9A of the Report:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

April 1, 2011

/s/ Jessica Q. Wang

Jessica Q. WangChief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Protocol for installing and monitoring a RestoreNet restoration field trial network site      

      January 6, 2022    

View Report

RestoreNet is an ecological restoration experiment that is networked across multiple sites, spanning dryland ecosystems in the southwestern United States. The experiment is organized and led by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Restoration Assessment and Monitoring Program for the Southwest (RAMPS). This protocol functions to provide guidance to additional partners on how to set up a RestoreNet site and expand the network to new locations. This protocol contains information for site selection, materials acquisition, experiment installation, data collection and monitoring, and data curation. Information includes protocols for the RestoreNet seeded experiment and an additional optional experiment using installed container seedlings initially propagated in a greenhouse. Participation in RestoreNet contributes to a growing body of knowledge on cutting edge ecological restoration methods for use in the southwestern United States to benefit land managers, landowners, and restoration practitioners.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Katie Laushman (Former Employee)          

##### RAMPS Field Manager - RestoreNet Project

Southwest Biological Science Center

####             Molly McCormick (Former Employee)          

##### RAMPS Coordinator/Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

#### Seth Munson, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

smunson@usgs.gov

928-556-7301

## Related Content

####             Katie Laushman (Former Employee)          

##### RAMPS Field Manager - RestoreNet Project

Southwest Biological Science Center

####             Molly McCormick (Former Employee)          

##### RAMPS Coordinator/Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

#### Seth Munson, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

smunson@usgs.gov

928-556-7301

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Nevada
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Integration of P- and SH-wave high-resolution seismic reflection and micro-gravity techniques to improve interpretation of shallow subsurface structure: New Madrid seismic zone      

      January 1, 2006    

Shallow high-resolution seismic reflection surveys have traditionally been restricted to either compressional (P) or horizontally polarized shear (SH) waves in order to produce 2-D images of subsurface structure. The northernmost Mississippi embayment and coincident New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) provide an ideal laboratory to study the experimental use of integrating P- and SH-wave seismic profiles, integrated, where practicable, with micro-gravity data. In this area, the relation between "deeper" deformation of Paleozoic bedrock associated with the formation of the Reelfoot rift and NMSZ seismicity and "shallower" deformation of overlying sediments has remained elusive, but could be revealed using integrated P- and SH-wave reflection. Surface expressions of deformation are almost non-existent in this region, which makes seismic reflection surveying the only means of detecting structures that are possibly pertinent to seismic hazard assessment. Since P- and SH-waves respond differently to the rock and fluid properties and travel at dissimilar speeds, the resulting seismic profiles provide complementary views of the subsurface based on different levels of resolution and imaging capability. P-wave profiles acquired in southwestern Illinois and western Kentucky (USA) detect faulting of deep, Paleozoic bedrock and Cretaceous reflectors while coincident SH-wave surveys show that this deformation propagates higher into overlying Tertiary and Quaternary strata. Forward modeling of micro-gravity data acquired along one of the seismic profiles further supports an interpretation of faulting of bedrock and Cretaceous strata. The integration of the two seismic and the micro-gravity methods therefore increases the scope for investigating the relation between the older and younger deformation in an area of critical seismic hazard. ?? 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

## Citation Information
KVA 50% L d T t l LWes Patterson, DOE Negotiating Committee, 04 Nov 2011KVAvs50%LoadTotalLossMVLF© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 1Scratch SheetsMVLF-1phALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%Unrestricted losses© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 3MVLF-3phALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...Unrestricted lossesSTD-10%-20%-30%-40%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 4-50%Reference DataMVLFALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...2010 STD 3phAverage Trendbefore 2010 STD3⁄4 rule2010 STD 1ph© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 6MVLFALLdesigns (including out-of-scope)KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1The currentstandard representsa loss reduction of- 45% for small KVA35% for large KVA-35%forlargeKVA2...3...4Large 1ph45%...2010 STD 3phFor same KVA rating-45%2010 STD 1phForsameKVAratingthe 1ph loss is equalto 0.75 x 3phLarge 3ph-35%Large 1ph-35%Small 1ph-45%Small 3ph-45%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 7MVLFALLdesigns – DOE KVA scopeKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 8MVLFALLdesigns – ABB-GO and OPS-SAKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 9MVLFALLdesigns – ABB-M3 and OPS-M3+SAKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 10MVLFALLdesigns – ABB-M3 and OPS-M3KVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 11MVLFALLdesigns –PadsKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 12MVLFALLdesigns –PolesKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3...4...STD-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 13MVLFALLdesigns –NetworksKVA (xaxis) vs 50% Load Total Loss (yaxis)-axis)vs50%LoadTotalLoss(y-1...2...3STD...4...-10%-20%-30%-40%-50%STD-10%20%--30%-40%-50%© ABBMonth DD, YYYY | Slide 14
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-16594-BKC-LMI

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

EFRAIN OSES

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF CONTINUED CONFIRMATION HEARING

AND TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO EXEMPTIONS

DEBTOR

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Confirmation Hearing and the Trustee's Objection to 

Exemptions has been continued to November 03, 2020 at 01:35 pm by TELEPHONE through 

CourtSolutions LLC. To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no 

later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged 

online at https://www.court-solutions.com If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be 

made by telephone at (917)746-7476.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Continued 

Confirmation Hearing and the Trustee's Objection to Exemptions was mailed to those parties listed below 

on this 16th day of October, 2020.

/s/ Nancy K. Neidich

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

_____________________________________

Case 20-16594-LMI Doc 46 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 2
 NOTICE OF CONTINUED CONFIRMATION HEARING AND TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO EXEMPTIONS

CASE NO.: 20-16594-BKC-LMI

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

NANCY K. NEIDICH

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

DEBTOR

EFRAIN OSES

6125 WEST 20 AVENUE #311

HIALEAH, FL 33012

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

ROBERT SANCHEZ, ESQUIRE

355 W 49 STREET

HIALEAH, FL 33012

ROBERT SANCHEZ, ESQUIRE IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAIL A CONFORMED COPY OF THIS 

NOTICE TO ALL CREDITORS AND INTERESTED PARTIES IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT 

THEREOF.

Case 20-16594-LMI Doc 46 Filed 10/16/20 Page 2 of 2
M.B., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-420

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 53 (Monday, March 18, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 11083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40318]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[PS-2-95]
RIN 1545-AT19


Distribution of Marketable Securities by a Partnership

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-31457 beginning on page 28 in the 
issue of Tuesday, January 2, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 1.731-2  [Corrected]

    On page 32, in the third column, in Sec. 1.731-2(j), Example 4(i), 
the table should read as follows:
* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Gain  
                                               Value    Basis    (loss) 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Security X..................................    1,000      500      500 
Security Y..................................    1,000      800      200 
Security Z..................................    1,000    1,100     (100)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

40568

Vol. 62, No. 145

Tuesday, July 29, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[BPD-889-NC]

RIN 0938-AH88

Medicare Program; Schedule of Limits

on Home Health Agency Costs Per

Visit for Cost Reporting Periods

Beginning on or After July 1, 1997

Correction

In notice document 97–17235

beginning on page 35608 in the issue of

Tuesday, July 1, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 35614, in the first column:

a. In the second example (2.), in the

equation line above Step 3, equation

‘‘11.58995÷10=158995’’ should read

‘‘11.58995÷10=1.158995’’.

b. In the second example (2.), Step

6, letter a, the equation line,

‘‘$79.01×1.01199=$79.89’’ should read

‘‘$79.01×1.011099=$79.89’’.

2. On page 35615, in the first table, in

the last entry line ‘‘Aggregate cost limit’’

in the fifth column over ‘‘Aggregate

limit’’, ‘‘918,5501’’ should read

‘‘918,550’’

3. On the same page, in the second

table, in the column entitled ‘‘Limit’’,

the first entry ‘‘101.20’’ should read

‘‘101.29’’.

4. On page 35619, the first and second

entries on that page, ‘‘DuPage, IL,

Grundy, IL’’ should read first entry

‘‘DuPage, IL’’, second entry ‘‘Grundy,

IL’’.

5. On page 35624, in the first column,

fourth entry from the bottom, ‘‘4480*’’

should read ‘‘4480’’.

6. On the same page, in the same

entry line, in the second column ‘‘Urban

area (Constituent counties or county

equivalents)’’ ‘‘Los Angeles-Long Beach

CA’’ should read ‘‘*Los Angeles-Long

Beach, CA’’.

7. On page 35628, in the ‘‘Wage

index’’ column, the third entry,

‘‘1.01116’’ should read ‘‘1.0116’’.

8. On page 35630, in entry line

beginning with ‘‘7560’’, in the second

column ‘‘Urban area (Constituent

counties or county equivalents)’’,

‘‘Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazelton, PA’’

should read ‘‘Scranton--Wilkes- Barre--

Hazelton, PA’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 332-372]

The Economic Implications of

Liberalizing APEC Tariff and Nontariff

Barriers to Trade

Correction

In document 97–19400 beginning on

page 39539 in the issue of Wednesday

July 23, 1997, make the following

correction:

On page 39540, in the second column,

at the bottom of the page, ‘‘Issued: July

14, 1979.’’’ should read ‘‘Issued: July 14,

1997.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Form CGFCRD3Z (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−24331−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re:

Ralph Levi Sanders Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

SSN: xxx−xx−6171

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Peter D. Russin to consider the

following:

Motion for Permission to Apologize to the Court and Trustee along with Permission to Stay in

Chapter 13 to Help my Creditors Filed by Debtor Ralph Levi Sanders Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit #

2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit) (Ferere, Magali) (174)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: August 2, 2021

Time: 01:00 PM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although

conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom

must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct

themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day

before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimENeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 7/29/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Christina Romero

Courtroom Deputy

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 175 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centra Software, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Paul R. Gudonis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                      
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Paul R. Gudonis                                  
|                       |  | Paul R. Gudonis President and Chief Executive
Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey A. McCutcheon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

**Date: March 17, 2008**

 

****The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. **A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will beretained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
# L_2004337EN.01007301.xml

| 13.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/73

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1101/2004 of 10 June 2004 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 211 of 12 June 2004
  )

In the Annex, on page 5, point A is replaced as follows:

‘A.   The following substance(s) is(are) inserted in Annex I (List of pharmacologically active substances for which maximum residue limits have been fixed).

1.   Anti-infectious agents

1.2.   Antibiotics

1.2.4.   Macrolides

| Pharmacologically active substance(s) | Marker residue | Animal species | MRLs | Target tissues |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| “Tulathromycin | (2R,3S,4R,5R,8R,10R,11R,12S, 13S,14R)-2-ethyl-3,4,10,13-tetrahydroxy-3,5,8,10,12,14-hexamethyl-11-[[3,4,6-trideoxy-3-(dimethylamino)-ß-D-xylo-hexopy-ranosyl]oxy]-1-oxa-6-azacyclopent-decan-15-one expressed as tulathromycin equivalents | Bovine (1) | 100  μg/kg | Fat |
| 3 000  μg/kg | Liver |
| 3 000  μg/kg | Kidney |
| Porcine | 100  μg/kg | Skin + fat |
| 3 000  μg/kg | Liver |
| 3 000  μg/kg | Kidney” ’ |

Pharmacologically active substance(s)

Marker residue

Animal species

MRLs

Target tissues

“Tulathromycin

(2R,3S,4R,5R,8R,10R,11R,12S, 13S,14R)-2-ethyl-3,4,10,13-tetrahydroxy-3,5,8,10,12,14-hexamethyl-11-[[3,4,6-trideoxy-3-(dimethylamino)-ß-D-xylo-hexopy-ranosyl]oxy]-1-oxa-6-azacyclopent-decan-15-one expressed as tulathromycin equivalents

Bovine (1)

100  μg/kg

Fat

3 000  μg/kg

Liver

3 000  μg/kg

Kidney

Porcine

100  μg/kg

Skin + fat

3 000  μg/kg

Liver

3 000  μg/kg

Kidney” ’

---

(1)  Not for use in animals from which milk is produced for human consumption.

1

---
1 The Honorable Peter J. Panuthos, United States Tax Court Judge. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1281

___________ Justyn J. Kozikowski, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the v. * United States Tax Court. * Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 7, 2007 Filed: November 15, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Justyn Kozikowski appeals the tax court’s 1 dismissal of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hear ing relating to tax deficiencies. Upon de novo review, we agree with the tax court that Kozikowski failed to state a plausible or cognizable claim for relief. SeeWilcox v. Comm’r , 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir. 1998) (de novo standard of review); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1974 (2007) (complaint must plead enough facts to state claim for relief that is plausible); Yuen v. Comm’r , 92 T.C.M. (CCH) 1, 3 (2006) (argument is frivolous where it is “contrary to established la w and unsupported by a r easoned, colorable-2- argument for change in the law”); May v. Comm’r , 752 F.2d 1301, 1303-04 & n.3 (8th Cir. 1985) (affirming dism issal for failure to state claim because, even if all of taxpayer’s allegations were assumed to be true, petition merely contained conclusory assertions attacking constitutionality of In ternal Revenue Codeand its applicability to taxpayer, all of which had been rejected). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Kozikowski’s pending motions.

______________________________