alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00385-CR 

MONITA MECHELLE SMITH, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 181st District Court 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 25,083-B, Honorable John B. Board, Presiding 

 

February 4, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Monita Mechelle Smith, appellant, appeals her convictions for burglary of a 

building and for credit card or debit card abuse as alleged in a two count indictment. 

Appellant pled guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement. Testimony was heard by 

the trial court and punishment was assessed at ten years for each count to run 

concurrently. Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an 

Anders1brief, wherein he certifies that, after diligently searching the record, he has 

 

1

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
2

concluded that the appeal is without merit. Along with his brief, he has filed a copy of a 

letter sent to appellant informing her of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible 

error and of appellant’s right to file a pro se response. So too did he represent that the 

appellate record was provided to appellant. By letter dated December 12, 2014, this 

court also notified appellant of her right to file her own brief or response by January 12, 

2015, if she wished to do so. To date, no response has been received. 

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel 

discussed potential areas for appeal which included the guilty pleas, sufficiency of the 

evidence to support the convictions, the punishment assessed, and the effectiveness of 

counsel. However, he then explained why the issues lacked merit. 

In addition, we conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of 

counsel’s conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 508 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991). After doing so, we concurred with counsel’s conclusions. 

Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgments are affirmed.2

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice

Do not publish.

 

2

Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal 

Appeals.
Exhibit 32
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Frank Erhartic, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
Frank Erhartic, Jr./s/
Daniel Judd
 Frank Erhartic, Jr.Daniel
Judd
 Chief Executive Officer
and President Chief Financial Officer
 May 20, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the TiVo Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Rogers, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



/s/ THOMAS ROGERSThomas RogersChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 126 (Friday, June 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 34320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10630]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket S-921]


Matson Navigation Company, Inc.; Notice of Application for 
Written Consent Pursuant to Section 506 of the Merchant Marine Act, 
1936, as amended, for the Transfer of the President Hoover, President 
Grant, and President Tyler to the Domestic Trade

    Notice is hereby given that Matson Navigation Company, Inc. 
(Matson), by letter of June 19, 1995, requests a waiver of the 
provisions of section 506 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended 
(Act), so as to permit Matson to operate in exclusively domestic 
service during the year commencing December 1, 1995, the U.S.-Flag C-8 
containerships the President Hoover, President Grant, and President 
Tyler (Vessels) not to exceed six months, with respect to each vessel, 
during that year period. The Vessels were built in the United States 
with the aid of construction-differential subsidy (CDS), and are 
currently owned by American President Lines, Ltd. (APL). Matson intends 
to purchase the Vessel from APL.
    Matson states that it intends to use the C-8S both in its 
Transpacific Alliance (Alliance) service, as well as in its Pacific 
Coast Shuttle (PCS) service, where they will engage on voyages among 
Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada; Seattle, Washington; Los Angeles 
and Oakland, California. The itinerary of the Alliance service vessels 
westbound will involve departures from California ports with calls at 
Honolulu and Guam outbound before arrival as Asian ports. The outbound 
calls at Hawaii and Guam are specifically permitted under section 506 
of the Act. Matson explains that due to operational exigencies involved 
in the start-up of the Alliance service, it is likely that the Vessels 
will have to be used interchangeably among the Alliance and PCS 
services for an indefinite period. However, Matson indicates that only 
two of the Vessels will be used in the PCS service at any time. 
Acquisition of the C-8s will mean that the PCS can be expanded to a 
twice weekly service, and that Oakland, CA can be added as port of 
call.
    Any person, firm, or corporation having any interest in the 
application for section 506 consent and desiring to submit comments 
concerning Matson's request must by 5;00 p.m. on July 17, 1995, file 
written comments in triplicate, to the Secretary, Maritime 
Administration, Room 7210, Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, D.C. 20590. The Maritime Administration, as a matter of 
discretion, will consider any comments submitted and take such action 
as may be deemed appropriate.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 20.800 
Construction-Differential Subsidies (CDS)).

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: June 27, 1995.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 1 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 2 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 3 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 4 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 5 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 6 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 7 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 8 of 9
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 1 Filed 08/21/19 Page 9 of 9
Tony Shakeem OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2828

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Processed and interpreted U.S. Geological Survey seismic reflection profile and vertical seismic profiles, Niobrara County, Wyoming      

      January 1, 1981    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Central Energy Resources Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBldg. 25Denver, CO80225United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Wyoming

View All **
**Exhibit
32**
  **Certification
Of Periodic Financial Report** **(Section
906 Certification)**
  Thomas E.
Vessey and Beth Sanders hereby certify as follows:
  1. They
are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
1st Centennial Bancorp.
 2. The
Form 10-Q of 1st Centennial Bancorp for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in
the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of 1st Centennial Bancorp.
 ****Date: May 12, 2005
    
    /s/ Thomas E. VesseyThomas
      E. Vessey, Chief ExecutiveOfficer
 
 ****Date: May 12, 2005
    
    /s/ Beth SandersBeth Sanders, Chief Financial
      Officer
26844 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 1995 / Rules and Regulations

[FR Doc. 95–12320 Filed 5–15–95; 4:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                       4,112,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  600,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,674,963
<PP&E>                                       1,631,453
<DEPRECIATION>                               (134,290)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,683,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,384,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   (617,801)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,683,981
<SALES>                                      6,534,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,534,992
<CGS>                                        5,527,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,527,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,311,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (250,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (250,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (250,093)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mineralogic and compositional properties of Martian soil and dust: results from Mars Pathfinder      

      February 1, 2000    

Mars Pathfinder obtained multispectral, elemental, magnetic, and physical measurements of soil and dust at the Sagan Memorial Station during the course of its 83 sol mission. We describe initial results from these measurements, concentrating on multispectral and elemental data, and use these data, along with previous Viking, SNC meteorite, and telescopic results, to help constrain the origin and evolution of Martian soil and dust. We find that soils and dust can be divided into at least eight distinct spectral units, based on parameterization of Imager for Mars Pathfinder (IMP) 400 to 1000 nm multispectral images. The most distinctive spectral parameters for soils and dust are the reflectivity in the red, the red/blue reflectivity ratio, the near-IR spectral slope, and the strength of the 800 to 1000 nm absorption feature. Most of the Pathfinder spectra are consistent with the presence of poorly crystalline or nanophase ferric oxide(s), sometimes mixed with small but varying degrees of well-crystalline ferric and ferrous phases. Darker soil units appear to be coarser-grained, compacted, and/or mixed with a larger amount of dark ferrous materials relative to bright soils. Nanophase goethite, akaganeite, schwertmannite, and maghemite are leading candidates for the origin of the absorption centered near 900 nm in IMP spectra. The ferrous component in the soil cannot be well-constrained based on IMP data. Alpha proton X-ray spectrometer (APXS) measurements of six soil units show little variability within the landing site and show remarkable overall similarity to the average Viking-derived soil elemental composition. Differences exist between Viking and Pathfinder soils, however, including significantly higher S and Cl abundances and lower Si abundances in Viking soils and the lack of a correlation between Ti and Fe in Pathfinder soils. No significant linear correlations were observed between IMP spectral properties and APXS elemental chemistry. Attempts at constraining the mineralogy of soils and dust using normative calculations involving mixtures of smectites and silicate and oxide minerals did not yield physically acceptable solutions. We attempted to use the Pathfinder results to constrain a number of putative soil and dust formation scenarios, including palagonitization and acid-fog weathering. While the Pathfinder soils cannot be chemically linked to the Pathfinder rocks by palagonitization, this study and McSween et al. [1999] suggest that palagonitic alteration of a Martian basaltic rock, plus mixture with a minor component of locally derived andesitic rock fragments, could be consistent with the observed soil APXS and IMP properties.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
Joseph MOORE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1539

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-683]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before September 28, 2020.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on March 16, 2020, AMPAC Fine Chemicals Virginia, LLC, 2820 North Normandy Drive, Petersburg, Virginia 23805-2380, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substances: Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleMethylphenidate
1724
IILevomethorphan
9210
IILevorphanol
9220
IIMorphine
9300
IIThebaine
9333
IINoroxymorphone
9668
IITapentadol
9780
II
 The company plans to manufacture the above-listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. R1-2020-16100 Filed 7-27-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 2, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 14596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30402]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 716

[OPPTS-82048; FRL-4996-9]


Preliminary Asessment Information and Health and Safety Data 
Reporting; Addition of Chemicals

Correction

    In rule document 96-4519 beginning on page 7421, in the issue of 
Wednesday, February 28, 1996, make the following corrections:


Sec. 716.120  [Corrected]

    1. On page 7425, in the 1st column, in Sec. 716.120, in the table, 
under the heading entitled ``Category'', in the 27th line, ``<greek-a>-
(octylphenyl)-<greek-a>-hydroxy-, branched.'' should read ``<greek-a>-
(octylphenyl)-<greek-oh>-hydroxy-, branched''.
    2. On the same page, in the 2nd column, in Sec. 716.120, in the 
table, under the heading entitled ``CAS No. (exemption for category)'', 
in the 27th line, ``48987-90-6'' should read ``68987-90-6''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF J. TERRY MEDOVITCH**Certification of Periodic Report**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Terry Medovitch, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                  /s/ J. Terry Medovitch   J. Terry Medovitch  May 14, 2007 Chief Financial Officer
Trentair Lavent BINGHAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0874

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
VIRGINIA ONE DEVELOPMENT, INC, AVERY PARK PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a AVERY PARK, DSH DIPLOMAT, LLC d/b/a/ DIPLOMAT TOWNHOMES, COLONY CREEK, LLC, and CROSSINGS TOWNHOMES, LLC, Complainants,


### v. THE CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, Respondent. FAADocketNo.16-12-09

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuantto 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to January 15, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat onNovember

# i..6 2014, I caused to be placed inthe United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension of Time to January 15,2015 for FAA Docket No. 16-12-09 addressed to: Counsel for Complainant: Steven M. Taber, Esq. Taber Law Group P.O. Box 60036 Irvine, CA 92602 Counsel for Respondent: Roy E. Hadley, Jr., Esq. John L. Watkins, Esq. Thompson Hine LLP 3560 Lenox Road, Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30326
Hand delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100

# QC~M~**1**

# ~/\ laudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
Exhibit 10.3



 





EXHIBIT 10.3




BOWATER INCORPORATED REPAYMENT AGREEMENT




     I, William G. Harvey, an employee of BOWATER INCORPORATED (the “Company”), have received
a bonus amount equal to $174,000 (the “Bonus”) from Bowater Incorporated (the Company) in
connection with services rendered in anticipation of the merger between Bowater Incorporated
and Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (the “Merger”).



     I hereby agree that if my employment with the Company or an affiliate of the Company
terminates within thirty-six months of the effective date of the Merger as the result of
either my voluntary termination or my involuntary termination for cause, I will be required
to reimburse the Company for a prorated portion of the after-tax value of my Bonus. In order
to determine the after-tax value, the effective tax rate shall be assumed to be 43%. The
proration of the amount of Bonus owed shall be computed as follows:


(1 — (days from effective date of the Merger to date of termination divided by 1,095)).




     The Company shall, to the extent permitted by applicable laws, reduce any compensation
otherwise due to me upon my termination of employment, including but not limited to regular
wages, severance pay and bonuses, by the amount of the Bonus that I am required to reimburse
the Company.



     The amount of the Bonus owed by me shall bear interest at the maximum rate of interest
permitted by law from the date of the termination of my employment until the date of
repayment. In addition, I agree to pay all costs of enforcement and collection, including,
without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees.



     This Agreement shall be binding upon me and my heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Company,
its successors and assigns.



     No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged except in a writing
specifically referring to such provision and signed by the party against which enforcement of
such modification, waiver or discharge is sought. No waiver by either party hereto of the
breach of any condition or provision of this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any other
condition or provision at the same or any other time.



     The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect
the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, which shall remain
in full force and effect.



     The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be
governed by the substantive laws of the State of South Carolina.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ William G. Harvey

	 	 
	 	Oct 29, 2007
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature: William G. Harvey

	 	 	 	Date