alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

68821

Vol. 61, No. 251

Monday, December 30, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Safety and Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 381

[Docket No. 94-022F-2]

RIN 0583-AC24

Use of the Term ‘‘Fresh’’ on the

Labeling of Raw Poultry Products

Correction

In rule document 96–31971 beginning

on page 66198 in the issue of Tuesday,

December 17, 1996 make the following

correction:

§381.129 [Corrected]

On page 66200, in the third column,

in §381.129(b)(6)(i), in the seventh line,

‘‘never’’ should read ‘‘ever’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Part 86

RIN 1810-AA83

Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention

Correction

In rule document 96-31874 beginning

on page 66225 in the issue of Tuesday,

December 17, 1996 make the following

correction:

PART 86 [CORRECTED]

1. On page 66225, in the third

column, in the ninth and tenth lines,

remove the authority citation.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, under amendatory instruction

1., insert ‘‘Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1145g,

unless otherwise noted.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 76

[AD–FRL–5666–1]

RIN 2060–AF48

Acid Rain Program; Nitrogen Oxides

Emission Reduction Program

Correction

In rule document 96–31839,

beginning on page 67112, in the issue of

Thursday, December 19, 1996, make the

following correction:

§76.5 [Corrected]

On page 67162, in the third column,

in amendatory instruction 3., ‘‘remaing’’

should read ‘‘removing’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 410

RIN 3206-AF99

Training

Correction

In rule document 96–31975 beginning

on page 66189 in the issue of Tuesday,

December 17, 1996, make the following

correction:

§410.403 [Corrected]

On page 66197, in the second column,

in §410.403(b), in the first line,

‘‘reduces’’ should read ‘‘reduced’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 581

RIN 3206–AH55

Processing Garnishment Orders for

Child Support and/or Alimony

Correction

In rule document 96–32137,

beginning on page 67378, in the issue of

Friday, December 20, 1996, make the

following correction:

Appendix A to Part 581 [Corrected]

On page 67378, in the second column,

in Appendix A to part 581, insert

‘‘Department of Agriculture’’ under the

heading I. Departments, and above the

entry ‘‘Office of the Secretary’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 198 / Friday, October 13, 2006 / Presidential Documents 60653 


gechino on PRODPC25 with PROPOSALS6ED13OC06.002</GPH>
60654 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 198 / Friday, October 13, 2006 / Presidential Documents 


gechino on PRODPC25 with PROPOSALS6ED13OC06.003</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50510]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 29, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 55840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-21029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT97-3-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 96-26545 appearing on page 54183 in the issue of 
Thursday, October 17, 1996 make the following correction:
    In the second column, the docket heading should read as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CertificationsPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned officers of Witness Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge and belief that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 7, 2007 |   |                      |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                    |   |                      |
|                    |   |                      |
|                    | BY:    | /s/ NICHOLAS DISCOMBE     |   |
|                    |   | Nicholas Discombe         |
|                    |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                    |   | * *                  |
|                    |   | * *                  |
| Dated: February 7, 2007 |   |                      |
|                    |   |                      |
|                    |   |                      |
|                    | BY:    | /s/ WILLIAM F. EVANS      |   |
|                    |   | William F. Evans          |
|                    |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc.and will be retained by Witness Systems, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Daymon Bodard, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of Nova Energy, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a_14) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  March 24, 2009  By /s/ Daymon Bodard Daymon Bodard, President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**










We
      have
      issued our reports dated September 10, 2007, accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements and schedule for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 and
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Collectors Universe,
      Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2007.  We hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in Registration
      Statements No. 333-34554, No. 333-34556, No. 333-34558, No. 333-85962, No.
      333-121035, No. 333-137375 and No. 333-139513 of Collectors Universe, Inc.
      and
      subsidiaries, each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form
      S-8.










/s/  GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Irvine,
      California


September
      10, 2007
Exhibit 99.1


                            INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS MARKETING CO.


                                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Relm Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




/s/ Nico P. Pronk
-----------------
Nico P. Pronk
Director
November 19, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 52 (Friday, March 15, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 10846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10315]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 52 / Friday, March 15, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 10846]]


GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 510, 515, 538 and 552

[ADP 2800.12A, CHGE 70]
RIN 3090-AF86


General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; 
Acquisition of Commercial Items

Correction

    In rule document 96-3593 beginning on page 6164 in the issue of 
Friday, February 16, 1996, make the following corrections:


510.011  [Corrected]

    1. On page 6165, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 9 
to section 510.011, in the fourth line, the cite should read ``48 CFR 
552.211-71''.


515.804-6  [Corrected]

    2. On page 6167, in the 2d column, in section 515.804-6(a), in the 
10th line, ``request'' should read ``requests''; and in the 13th line, 
``provisions'' should read ``provision''.


538.270  [Corrected]

    3. On page 6169, in the first column, in section 538.270(d), at the 
end of the fourth line insert ``the MAS solicitation with the terms and 
conditions of''.


552.212-71  [Corrected]

    4. On page 6171, in the second column, in section 552.212-71, in 
the list of clauses, the fourth and fifth clauses should read:
 * * * * *
--552.215-71 Examination of Records by GSA (Multiple Award Schedule)
--552.215-72 Price Adjustment for Incomplete, Not Current or 
Inaccurate Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data
 * * * * *


552.216-71  [Corrected]

    5. On page 6172, in the second column, in amendatory instruction 59 
to section 552.216-71, in the last line, ``Price'' should ``Practice''.


552.243-72  [Corrected]

    6. On page 6173, in the first column, in section 552.243-72, 
paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of the clause, in the second line from the bottom, 
``basic'' should read ``basis''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Post-wildfire landscape change and erosional processes from repeat terrestrial lidar in a steep headwater catchment, Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona, USA      

      October 31, 2017    

Flooding and erosion after wildfires present increasing hazard as climate warms, semi-arid lands become drier, population increases, and the urban interface encroaches farther into wildlands. We quantify post-wildfire erosion in a steep, initially unchannelized, 7.5 ha headwater catchment following the 2011 Horseshoe 2 Fire in the Chiricahua Mountains of southeastern Arizona. Using time-lapse cameras, rain gauges, and repeat surveys by terrestrial laser scanner, we quantify the response of a burned landscape to subsequent precipitation events. Repeat surveys provide detailed pre-and post-rainfall measurements of landscape form associated with a range of weather events. The first post-fire precipitation led to sediment delivery equivalent to 0.017 m of erosion from hillslopes and 0.12 m of erosion from colluvial hollows. Volumetrically, 69% of sediment yield was generated from hillslope erosion and 31% was generated from gully channel establishment in colluvial hollows. Processes on hillslopes included erosion by extensive shallow overland flow, formation of rills and gullies, and generation of sediment-laden flows and possibly debris flows. Subsequent smaller rain events caused ongoing hillslope erosion and local deposition and erosion in gullies. Winter freeze-thaw led to soil expansion, likely related to frost-heaving, causing a net centimeter-scale elevation increase across soil-mantled slopes. By characterizing landscape form, the properties of near-surface materials, and measuring both precipitation and landscape change, we can improve our empirical understanding of landscape response to environmental forcing. This detailed approach to studying landscape response to wildfires may be useful in the improvement of predictive models of flood, debris flow and sedimentation hazards used in post-wildfire response assessments and land management, and may help improve process-based models of landscape evolution.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Stephen B DeLong, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

sdelong@usgs.gov

651-356-4102

## Related Content

#### Stephen B DeLong, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

sdelong@usgs.gov

651-356-4102

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - chiricahua mountains
                  - Arizona

View All **
Tommye B. GOFF, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20212]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 1417-001 and 1835-013]


Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District and 
Nebraska Public Power District; Notice of Public Briefing

Correction

    In notice document 95-1809, appearing on page 3394, in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 31, 1996, the project numbers were inadvertently 
omitted and should appear as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Kevin M. ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Douglas J. KOUFMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3828

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Charter Environmental, Inc. Under Contract No. FA8903-06-D-8503 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA No. 59768

Peter F. Carr, II, Esq.

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC Boston, MA APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. Air Force Deputy ChiefTrial Attorney Maj George M. Ebert, USAF

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 3 November 2016

MARK N. STEMPLER / v Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59768, Appeal ofCharter Environmental, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>
<Table>
<S>         <C>                                 <C>                            <C>
            DEAN HELLER                               Certificate of                  FILED # C1841-6
            Secretary of State                          Amendment
[SEAL]                                         (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and              MAR 19 2002
            202 North Carson Street                       78.390)
            Carson City, Nevada 89701-4201                                            IN THE OFFICE OF
            (775) 684-5708                                                            /s/ DEAN HELLER
                                                                               DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE
</Table>
              IMPORTANT: READ ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
         (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390 - AFTER ISSUANCE OF STOCK)
                             - REMIT IN DUPLICATE -


1. Name of corporation: Blagman Media International, Inc. 1841-1961


2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
   available):

   Article VI should be replaced in its entirety with the following: "The total
   authorized number of shares of the corporation is five billion ten million
   one hundred (5,010,000,100) consisting of: five billion (5,000,000,000)
   shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share and ten million one
   hundred (10,000,100) shares of Preferred Stock with the rights, preferences,
   designations and restrictions as determined by the Board of Directors from
   time to time."






3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
   entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
   greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a
   vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the
   articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: more than
   50%"

4. Officer Signature (Required):

     /s/ ROBERT BLAGMAN                           Chairman/CEO
-----------------------------------       --------------------------------------

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
  or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the
  amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote
  otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the
  voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
  limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

  IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remit the
  proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 72 (Friday, April 12, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 16287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No. 28420 Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 74]
RIN 2120-AGO2


Airspace and Flight Operations Requirements for the 1996 Summer 
Olympic Games, Atlanta, GA

Correction

    In rule document 96-2988 beginning on page 5492 in the issue of 
Monday, February 12, 1996 make the following corrections:
    (1) On page 5493, in the second column, in the paragraph under 
Exceptions, in the third line ``tariff'' should read ``traffic''.
    (2) On page 5498, in the third column, under ``12. U.S. Highway 64; 
Tennessee'' in the fifth line ``84 deg.28'37'' W.'' should read 
``84 deg.27'37'' W.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0495

SAT Date: 6/25/2013

Print Date: 1/31/2014

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: Forward: reduces VOCs

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

LUNG

ONCO

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0495

FATE: 

Solid with MP = Dec. 200 C (M)

S < 1 mg/L at 25 C (Analog)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes, based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly 

soluble respirable particulates ). There is also concern for 

oncogenicity if inhaled, based on the crystalline structure of the PMN substance.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog analysis for 

functionalized ; SAR chemical class = ; MW100000; 

pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; low concern for toxicity;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3