alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 9, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10409]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 9, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 15868]]


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 159 and 160

[CGD 93-055]
RIN 2115-AE58


Approval of Inflatable Personal Flotation Devices (PFDs) for 
Recreational Boaters

Correction

    In rule document 96-7302 beginning on page 13924, in the issue of 
Thursday, March 28, 1996, make the following corrections:


Sec. 159.010-7  [Corrected]

    1. On page 13929, in the first column, in Sec. 159.010-7 
(b)(9)(vii) was designated incorrectly the second time and the 
paragraph should read ``(viii)''.


Sec. 160.048-7  [Corrected]

    2. On page 13930, in the first column, in Sec. 160.048-7, in the 
second line, ``(b)'' should read ``(d)''.


Sec. 160.077-9  [Corrected]

    3. On page 13931, in the second column, in Sec. 160.077-9 (a), in 
the fourth line, ``159.055'' should read ``159.005''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Andrew MARGOLIS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Lourdes ROBLES, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 5D17-1916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

CROSS-APPEAL AFFIRMED.
GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Charles H. Phelps, Bonnie R. Phelps, Clifton Park Homeowners Association, and ISPC, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-4052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetotelluric sampling and geoelectric hazard estimation: Are national-scale surveys sufficient?              

      June 11, 2021    

At present, the most reliable information for inferring storm-time ground electric fields along electrical transmission lines comes from coarsely sampled, national-scale magnetotelluric (MT) data sets, such as that provided by the EarthScope USArray program. An underlying assumption in the use of such data is that they adequately sample the spatial heterogeneity of the surface relationship between geomagnetic and geoelectric fields. Here, we assess the degree to which the density of MT data sampling affects geoelectric hazard assessments. For electrical transmission networks in each of four focus regions across the contiguous United States, we perform two parallel band-limited (101–103 s) hazard analyses: one using only USArray-style (∼70-km station spacing) MT data, and one incorporating denser (≪70-km station spacing) MT data. We find that the use of USArray-style MT sampling alone provides a useful first-order estimate of integrated geoelectric fields along electrical transmission lines. However, we also find that the use of higher density MT data can in some areas lead to order-of-magnitude differences in line-averaged electric field estimates at the level of individual transmission lines and can also yield significant differences in subregional hazard patterns. As we demonstrate using variogram plots, these differences reflect short-spatial-scale variability in Earth conductivity, which in turn reflects regional lithotectonic structure and history. We also provide a cautionary example in the use of electrical conductivity models to predict dense MT data; although valuable for hazard applications, models may only be able to reproduce surface geoelectric fields as captured by the MT data from which they were derived.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Benjamin S Murphy, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Mendenhall Postdoctoral Fellow

Geomagnetism Program

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

## Related Content

                  - Connect              Benjamin S Murphy, PhD (Former Employee)          Mendenhall Postdoctoral FellowGeomagnetism ProgramAnna Kelbert, Ph.D.Research GeophysicistGeomagnetism ProgramEmailakelbert@usgs.govPhone303-273-8448Paul A BedrosianResearch GeophysicistGeology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science CenterEmailpbedrosian@usgs.govPhone303-236-4834 

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United  States

View All **
Mark DOZIER, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Northern end of the Dead Sea Basin: Geometry from reflection seismic evidence      

      January 1, 2007    

Recently released reflection seismic lines from the Eastern side of the Jordan River north of the Dead Sea were interpreted by using borehole data and incorporated with the previously published seismic lines of the eastern side of the Jordan River. For the first time, the lines from the eastern side of the Jordan River were combined with the published reflection seismic lines from the western side of the Jordan River. In the complete cross sections, the inner deep basin is strongly asymmetric toward the Jericho Fault supporting the interpretation of this segment of the fault as the long-lived and presently active part of the Dead Sea Transform. There is no indication for a shift of the depocenter toward a hypothetical eastern major fault with time, as recently suggested. Rather, the north-eastern margin of the deep basin takes the form of a large flexure, modestly faulted. In the N-S-section along its depocenter, the floor of the basin at its northern end appears to deepen continuously by roughly 0.5??km over 10??km distance, without evidence of a transverse fault. The asymmetric and gently-dipping shape of the basin can be explained by models in which the basin is located outside the area of overlap between en-echelon strike-slip faults. ?? 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Uri ten Brink, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

utenbrink@usgs.gov

508-457-2396

## Related Content

#### Uri ten Brink, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

utenbrink@usgs.gov

508-457-2396

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - israel
                  -  Jordan
                  -  Palestine
                  - Dead Sea

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 8, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 52842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-21008]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 8, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 52842]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-1-118-000]


Arkansas Western Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 96-24384 on page 50006 in the issue of Tuesday, 
September 24, 1996, in the second column, the Docket number should read 
as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00181-CV 

IN RE STEPHEN STEPHON WILLIAMS RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 19, 2014

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

2Although relator argues that he has no adequate remedy by appeal 

because he has previously applied for habeas relief and that the court of criminal 

appeals will therefore apply code of criminal procedure article 11.07, section 4 to 

bar review, we believe that this a matter best left to the legislature. Cf. Ex parte 

Parrott, 396 S.W.3d 531, 533–34 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (addressing complaint 

of illegal sentence via application of writ of habeas corpus).
Arslan ASLAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Justin T. FRIEND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1940

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is granted.
# L_2004203EN.01001101.xml

| 8.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1078/2004

of 7 June 2004

fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1b of Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 for a fortnightly period shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 June 2004.

It shall apply from 9 to 22 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).

2

---

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 7 June 2004 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

| (EUR/100 pieces) |
| --- |
| Period: from 9 to 22 June 2004 |
| Community producer price | Uniflorous (bloom)
  carnations | Multiflorous (spray)
  carnations | Large-flowered roses | Small-flowered roses |
| | 12,85 | 11,24 | 29,45 | 19,16 |

(EUR/100 pieces)

Period: from 9 to 22 June 2004

Community producer price

Uniflorous (bloom)

carnations

Multiflorous (spray)

carnations

Large-flowered roses

Small-flowered roses

12,85

11,24

29,45

19,16

| Community import prices | Uniflorous (bloom)
  carnations | Multiflorous (spray)
  carnations | Large-flowered roses | Small-flowered roses |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Israel | — | — | — | — |
| Morocco | — | — | — | — |
| Cyprus | — | — | — | — |
| Jordan | — | — | — | — |
| West Bank and Gaza Strip | — | — | — | — |

Community import prices

Uniflorous (bloom)

carnations

Multiflorous (spray)

carnations

Large-flowered roses

Small-flowered roses

Israel

—

—

—

—

Morocco

—

—

—

—

Cyprus

—

—

—

—

Jordan

—

—

—

—

West Bank and Gaza Strip

—

—

—

—

---
Summary of Meeting Between Environmental Health and Safety Communications (EHSCP) and

EPA Staff

August 9, 201 1

List of Attendees

Greg Schaner, EPA

Brian Jenschke, Titan Engineering

Richard Davis, Beveridge and Diamond

Barbara Patton, AT&T

Julianna Barnom, Verizon

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, the following issues were discussed:

Characteristics of linear communications construction projects;

Clarifications of proposed permit requirements;

The need for flexibility for linear communications constru ction projects with regard to

certain proposed permit provisions (e.g., perimeter controls, entrance and exit points,

requirement to install stormwater controls prior to disturbances; fueling areas and staging

and storage area requirements; off

- site storag e areas);and

The definition of emergency

- related projects.
Earl BUTLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3527

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 93 (Monday, May 13, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 22084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30513]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36960; File No. SR-OCC-95-20]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Issuance, 
Clearance, and Settlement of Buy-Write Options Unitary Derivatives

Correction

    In notice document 96-6643 beginning on page 11458 in the issue of 
Wednesday, March 20, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 11461, in the third column, the signature should read 
``Margaret H. McFarland,''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50824 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS RODRIGUEZ-LAZCANO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-829-ALL-EP

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Carlos Rodriguez-Lazcano appeals the 51-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rodriguez-Lazcano complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior removal following an aggravated felony conviction. Rodriguez-Lazcano argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause because it permitted the sentencing judge to find, under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a factNo. 01-50824 -2- which increased the statutory maximum sentence to which he otherwise would have been exposed. Rodriguez-Lazcano thus contends that his sentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rodriguez-Lazcano acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). RodriguezLazcano’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3617 

To ensure sufficient sizing of the civilian and contract services workforces 

of the Department of Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, 

Mr. BEGICH, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ensure sufficient sizing of the civilian and contract 

services workforces of the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CIVILIAN AND CONTRACT SERVICES WORK4 FORCE BALANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, 

6 consistent with the requirements of sections 129 and 129a 

7 of title 10, United States Code, ensure that the civilian 

8 and contract services workforces of the Department of De9 fense are sufficiently sized, taking into account military 

10 strategy requirements and military end-strength. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3617 IS

1 (b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later 

2 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

3 and annually thereafter, the Comptroller General of the 

4 United States shall submit to the congressional defense 

5 committees a report assessing the sufficiency of sizing of 

6 the civilian and contract services workforces of the De7 partment of Defense. The report shall assess whether the 

8 sizing is consistent with workforce management and 

9 sourcing laws, including sections 129 and 129a of title 10, 

10 United States Code. 

11 (c) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE12 FINED.—In this Act, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

13 committees’’ has the meaning given the term in section 

14 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Lugarda AGUERO, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3638

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 27, 2017

Scot E. Samis of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

George A. Vaka and Nancy A. Lauten of Vaka Law Group, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of DirectorsDigimarc Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Nos. 333-31114, 333-42042, 333-65256,333-82660, 333-105097, 333-115074) on Form S-8 andRegistration Statement No. 333-108670 on Form S-3 ofDigimarc Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2005, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of Digimarc Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31,2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Digimarc Corporation.

As indicated in Note 2 to the consolidatedFinancial Statements, Digimarc Corporation has restated its consolidatedFinancial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Digimarc Corporation hasnot reported on, and we have not audited the effectiveness of the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. Accordingly,we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on theeffectiveness of Digimarc Corporation’s internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Portland, OregonApril 7, 2005

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90207]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth BAILEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1463

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
1

Chappell, Regina

From: Sasser, Erika

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:37 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron; Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Henigin, Mary; Chappell, Regina; Corrales, Mark; Cooperstein, Sharon; Orlin, David; Hemby, 

James; Rush, Alan; Stewart, Lori; Koerber, Mike; South, Peter; Weatherhead, Darryl; 

Langdon, Robin; Hetes, Bob; Kopits, Elizabeth

Subject: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone 

(RIN 2060-AP38)-- RIA (Redline)

Attachments: EO12866-O3-NAAQS-RIN2060-AP38-RIA-FINAL_RLSO_20150929.docx

Attached please find the redline version of the final O3 NAAQS RIA reflecting changes made in response to interagency

comments. Please let me know if there are any questions about these materials.  

(Clean version of RIA to follow due to file size.)

Thank you,

Erika
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-13104-BKC-PDR

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

MARC-AUREL GENECE

XXX-XX-2300

_____________________________/

REPORT OF COMPLIANCE

COMES NOW the Trustee, Robin R. Weiner, Esquire, and reports to the Court as follows:

DEBTOR

1. Pursuant to Administrative Order 98-6, a Notice of Delinquency was served on July 20, 2023, as a 

result of the Debtor's failure to remain current under the confirmed plan.

2. The Debtor is substantially current under the last filed Notice of Delinquency.

3. Accordingly, the Trustee reports that this case should proceed in the normal course.

WHEREFORE, the Trustee reports these facts to the court for appropriate action.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 12th day of September, 2023.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this 

court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of this Report Of Compliance 

was served, via U.S. first class mail, certified mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed on the attached 

service list this 12th day of September, 2023.

_____________________________________ /s/ Robin R. Weiner

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

TELEPHONE: 954-382-2001

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 861154

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 53 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 2
REPORT OF COMPLIANCE

CASE NO.: 20-13104-BKC-PDR

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

MARC-AUREL GENECE

5170 SW 19 ST

PLANTATION, FL 33317

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

JOHN D. SEGAUL, ESQUIRE

300 S PINE ISLAND ROAD

SUITE 304

PLANTATION, FL 33324

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 53 Filed 09/12/23 Page 2 of 2
Christina PAYLAN, M. D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Timothy J. FITZGERALD, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.