alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2022

No. 04-22-00199-CR, 04-22-00200-CR, 04-22-00201-CR, 04-22-00202-CR 

Roman Dexter SOTO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7817, 7818, 7819, 7820

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Roman Dexter Soto has filed a motion to consolidate Appeal Nos. 04-22-

00199-CR, 04-22-00200-CR, 04-22-00201-CR and 04-022-00202-CR. Based on the 

representations in the motion regarding similarities in the cases, this Court has determined that 

the appeals should be consolidated for briefing and oral argument, if granted by the panel.

We therefore GRANT the motion and ORDER the appeals consolidated for the purpose 

of briefing and oral argument, if any. The parties shall file all motions, briefs, and other 

documents as if the appeals were one case but shall include all four appeal numbers in the style.

If oral argument is granted by the panel, the appeals will be argued together, as a single 

appeal, and the total time limit for each side at oral argument shall equal the ordinary time limit 

for a single appeal. The Court will dispose of all four appeals with the same judgment, opinion, 

and mandate.

Appellant’s request for an extension of time to file his appellant’s brief is GRANTED 

and the appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this court thirty (30) days after the date of this order.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.2

FIFTH LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

This Loan Modification Agreement is entered into as of March 10, 2004 by and betweenWITNESS
SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Borrower"), whose address is 300 Colonial Center Parkway, Roswell, Georgia 30076, andSILICON VALLEY
BANK("Lender"), a California-chartered bank with a principal place of business at 3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054 and with a loan production office located at 3353
Peachtree Road, Suite M-10, Atlanta, GA 30326.

WHEREAS,
among other indebtedness which may be owing by Borrower to Lender, Borrower is indebted to Lender pursuant to, among other documents, a Loan and Security Agreement, dated
April 3, 2002, as may be amended from time to time, in the original principal amount of Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000) (the "Loan Agreement"; the Loan Agreement together with all other
documents evidencing or securing the indebtedness shall be referred to as the "Existing Loan Documents");

WHEREAS,
the Loan Agreement provides for, among other things, a Committed Revolving Line in the original principal amount of Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000) (hereinafter, all
indebtedness owing by Borrower to Lender shall be referred to as the "Indebtedness"); and

WHEREAS,
Borrower has requested that Lender amend the Loan Agreement, and Lender is willing to do so, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:



1

---





[signatures
appear on following page]

2

---



This
Loan Modification Agreement is executed as of the date first written above.

| |  | LENDER:              
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | SILICON VALLEY BANK  
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      
| |  | Name:                
| |  |                      
| |  | Title:               
| |  |                      
| |  | BORROWER:            
| |  | WITNESS SYSTEMS, INC.
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      
| |  | Name:                
| |  |                      
| |  | Title:               
| |  |                      

3

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



(Section 302 Certification)



I, Thomas E. Vessey, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 1st Centennial Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves Management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 09, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Thomas E. Vessey                 
|Thomas E. Vessey,                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 31184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30613]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Stefan A. Bird, President of CE Generation, LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 Date: November 5, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Stefan A. Bird
 Stefan A. Bird
 President
 (chief executive officer)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4823 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for special procedures for P–2 nonimmigrants who are Canadian citizens, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2016 

Mr. TROTT (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of New York, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for special procedures for P–2 nonimmigrants who are 

Canadian citizens, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Entertain5 ment Artists to the States (BEATS) Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULES FOR P–2 NONIMMIGRANTS WHO 

7 ARE CANADIAN CITIZENS. 

8 Section 214(c)(4)(E) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(4)(E)) is amended by adding 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4823 IH

1 at the end the following: ‘‘A petition described in section 

2 101(a)(15)(P)(ii) seeking classification of a citizen of Can3 ada as a nonimmigrant under that section may be filed 

4 in conjunction with an application for admission of the 

5 citizen of Canada. Such filing may be made with an immi6 gration officer at a Class A port of entry located on the 

7 United States-Canada land border or at a United States 

8 pre-clearance station in Canada. The petitioning organiza9 tion is not required to make an appearance (either person10 ally or by telecommunication), but the application form 

11 shall bear the authorized signature of the petitioner. An 

12 immigration officer at such a port of entry or pre-clear13 ance station may determine eligibility of an individual cit14 izen of Canada seeking nonimmigrant classification under 

15 section 101(a)(15)(P)(ii). If such petition is submitted 

16 concurrently with an application for admission and lacks 

17 necessary supporting documentation or is otherwise defi18 cient, the inspecting immigration officer shall return it to 

19 the applicant for admission in order to obtain the nec20 essary documentation from the petitioner or for the defi21 ciency to be corrected. Nothing in this section may be con22 strued to preclude or discourage the advance filing of peti23 tions in accordance with other sections of this Act. After 

24 admission to the United States, a citizen of Canada admit25 ted pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(P)(ii) may, during the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4823 IH

1 period of validity for nonimmigrant status under such sec2 tion and without filing an amended petition, (i) alter the 

3 dates and venues of performances listed in the original pe4 tition and (ii) add additional performances or engage5 ments, provided that the altered or additional perform6 ances or engagements constitute no more than one third 

7 of the performances or engagements listed on the original 

8 petition.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
ROLLS-ROYCE, PLC, a foreign profit corporation, Appellant, v. SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Rolls-Royce Corporation, a foreign corporation, Rolls-Royce North America, Inc., a foreign profit corporation, IAE International Aero Engines AG, a foreign profit entity, Pratt & Whitney, a division of United Technologies Corporation, a foreign profit corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-1215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Quality and quantity of runoff and atmospheric deposition in urban areas of Salt Lake County, Utah, 1980-81      

      January 1, 1984    

View Plate

Water of good quality from mountain streams is degraded as it moves through urban areas to the Jordan River in Salt Lake County, Utah. The impact of urban runoff and atmospheric deposition on the quality of water in those streams and in storm conduits and canals functioning as storm drains was evaluated using data collected during 1980-81. Atmospheric-wetfall loads for an average storm were as much as 10 pounds per acre for total solids, but the dissolved trace metals were generally present in insignificant quantities. Wetfall-deposition loads generally were greater than storm-runoff loads, indicating that a large quantity of the wetfall load remained as soil deposits. Acid rain fell in more than one-half of the storms sampled, most commonly in September and October. Dustfall concentrations reflected the composition of local soils, particularly with regard to iron, manganese, and chromium; but concentrations of cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, and chloride were considerably enriched. Monthly loads of dryfall solids reached a maximum of 62 pounds per acre in the Little Cottonwood Creek urban basin, but were of the same magnitude as total storm loads for a heavy rainfall. Urban runoff represented about 38 percent of the discharge in three canals. The water in the canals was poorer in quality than the water in the mountain streams. The impact of the canal discharges to the streams is slight, however, owing to their ' relatively small amounts. ' Concentrations of sediment, suspended solids, suspended trace metals, phosphorus, and oxygen-demanding substances were much greater during storm runoff than under base-flow conditions. This report contains data for basin and storm characteristics and water-quality information for atmospheric deposition and urban runoff. (USGS)

## Citation Information
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Bruce Davis, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Digimarc Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

|Date: December 8, 2003 |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:                    |  | /s/BRUCE DAVISBruce Davis Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
Ronnie C. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
John Robert GACKENBACK, Appellant, v. Roxanne Stella HULSE, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2127

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1


                      INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS MARKETING CO.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Cosmetics Marketing Co.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nico P. Pronk, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Nico P. Pronk
-----------------
Nico P. Pronk
Director
May 9, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

RON VIGDOR CASE NO. 20-12751-MAM

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER 

CONFIRMING THE AUTOMATIC STAY IS NOT IN EFFECT 

THIS CASE came on for consideration on the Motion for Order Confirming the Automatic 

Stay is not in Effect (“Motion”) filed by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation as servicer for Toyota 

Lease Trust (“Movant”) (Doc. No. 55), pursuant to Local Rule 4001-1(C)(2)(b). The Court, having

reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised on the premises, finds it appropriate to 

grant the requested relief. It is

ORDERED:

1. The Motion (Doc. No. 55) is granted.

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 55-2 Filed 02/23/21 Page 1 of 2
2. The automatic stay arising by reason of 11 U.S.C. §362 of the Bankruptcy Code is 

confirmed to be terminated as to Movant’s interest in the following property: 2017 Lexus IS200; 

VIN: JTHBA1D24H5048525 (“collateral”). 

###

Submitted by:

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Movant is directed to serve a copy of this order to the parties listed below and file a 

Certificate of Service with the Court.

Copies furnished to:

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Ron Vigdor 

5204 Lane Parke Court 

Mountain Brook, AL 35223 

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE

Mitchell J. Nowack, Esq. 

Christian J. Olson, Esq. 

8551 Sunrise Blvd. 

Suite 208 

Plantation, FL 33322 

Robin R. Weiner 

POB 559007 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355 

U.S. Trustee

Office of the US Trustee 

51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

Suite 1204 

Miami, FL 33130

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 55-2 Filed 02/23/21 Page 2 of 2
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: February 25, 2016 D-12-16 

___________________________________

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

AMY CLAUDINE McFADDEN,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 2970218)

___________________________________

Calendar Date: November 30, 2015

Before: Garry, J.P., Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Amy Claudine McFadden, Westfield, New Jersey, respondent

pro se.

__________

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

1999, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014

for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements

of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she 

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of
-2- D-12-16 

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to

respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Garry, J.P., Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3624 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3624

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend section 31311 of title 49, United States Code, to permit 
 States to issue commercial driver's licenses to members of the Armed 
           Forces whose duty station is located in the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Commercial Driver's License 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. DOMICILE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE.

    Section 31311(a)(12) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(12)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), 
        the State may issue a commercial driver's license only to an 
        individual who operates or will operate a commercial motor 
        vehicle and is domiciled in the State.
            ``(B) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the 
        State may issue a commercial driver's license to an individual 
        who--
                    ``(i) operates or will operate a commercial motor 
                vehicle; and
                    ``(ii) is not domiciled in a State that issues 
                commercial driver's licenses.
            ``(C) The State may issue a commercial driver's license to 
        an individual who--
                    ``(i) operates or will operate a commercial motor 
                vehicle;
                    ``(ii) is a member of the active duty military, 
                military reserves, National Guard, active duty United 
                States Coast Guard, or Coast Guard Auxiliary; and
                    ``(iii) is not domiciled in the State, but whose 
                temporary or permanent duty station is located in the 
                State.''.

            Passed the Senate September 22 (legislative day, September 
      21), 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3624

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend section 31311 of title 49, United States Code, to permit 
 States to issue commercial driver's licenses to members of the Armed 
           Forces whose duty station is located in the State.
```