alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3672 

To clarify the collateral requirement for certain loans under section 7(d) 

of the Small Business Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2012 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To clarify the collateral requirement for certain loans under 

section 7(d) of the Small Business Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF COLLATERAL REQUIRE4 MENTS. 

5 Section 7(d)(6) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

6 636(d)(6)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘which are made 

7 under paragraph (1) of subsection (b)’’ the following: ‘‘: 

8 Provided further, That the Administrator, in obtaining the 

9 best available collateral for a loan of not more than 

10 $200,000 under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (b) reVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:22 Dec 13, 2012 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3672.IS S3672

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3672 IS

1 lating to damage to or destruction of the property of, or 

2 economic injury to, a small business concern, shall not re3 quire the owner of the small business concern to use the 

4 primary residence of the owner as collateral if the Admin5 istrator determines that the owner has other assets with 

6 a value equal to or greater than the amount of the loan 

7 that could be used as collateral for the loan: Provided fur8 ther, That nothing in the preceding proviso may be con9 strued to reduce the amount of collateral required by the 

10 Administrator in connection with a loan described in the 

11 preceding proviso or to modify the standards used to 

12 evaluate the quality (rather than the type) of such collat13 eral’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Population structure, body mass, activity, and orientation of an aquatic snake (*Seminatrix pygaea*) during a drought      

      January 1, 1993    

The snout – vent length, tail length, weight, sex, activity, and orientation of a population of swamp snakes (Seminatrix pygaea) in north – central Florida were recorded from 1985 through 1990. A small temporary pond was monitored for 1343 days, using a drift fence – pitfall trap sampling regime. I captured 123 different snakes, plus 45 recaptures. Juveniles comprised 89% of the snakes at the pond. Females were generally longer and weighed more than males, although regression analysis showed no differences between the sexes in the relationship of length versus wet body mass. Males had longer tails than females. The sex ratio of snakes with a snout – vent length of more than 150 mm was 1:1. Activity occurred throughout the year but peaked during summer. Hydroperiod and weather conditions did not appear to influence snake activity. During the latter years of the study, a regional drought that began in the mid-1980s became quite severe. However, drought had little direct effect on overland migration or body condition but caused snakes to leave or to shorten the amount of time they spent within the pond basin. Snakes immigrated and emigrated nonrandomly; orientation was directed to and from the nearest large water body. Certain temporary ponds may comprise developmental habitat for Seminatrix pygaea. The dynamic wet – dry climatic cycles in southeastern North America may lead to the formation of metapopulations in some aquatic snakes.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956
NUMBER 13-21-00008-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF A.T.M., G.B., AND P.F.L., CHILDREN

On appeal from the 377th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. Appellants’ briefs were 

filed on March 15 and 16, 2021. The brief of appellee, the Texas Department of Family 

and Protective Services, was due on April 6, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). Appellee 

has filed a motion for extension of time seeking fifteen additional days to file the brief.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the 

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals, but include additional expedited 

deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The 
2

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that 

appeals in such cases are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the 

notice of appeal is filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Accordingly, it is the policy of this 

Court to limit extensions of time in such cases. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

We GRANT appellee’s motion for extension of time and ORDER appellee’s brief

to be filed on or before 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 21, 2021. No further extensions of 

time will be granted absent truly extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

7th day of April, 2021.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Of reef fishes, overfishing and in situ observations of fish traps in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands      

      January 1, 1998    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Caroline Rogers, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

caroline_rogers@usgs.gov

340-690-6386

## Related Content

#### Caroline Rogers, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

caroline_rogers@usgs.gov

340-690-6386

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - st. john
                  - U.S. Virgin Islands

View All **
CGFD65 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 5, 2020

John K Olson

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−24331−JKO

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Ralph Levi Sanders Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

SSN: xxx−xx−6171

ORDER DETERMINING DEBTOR'S

COMPLIANCE WITH FILING REQUIREMENTS OF §521(a)(1)

 Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i), if an individual debtor in a voluntary case under chapter 7 or 13 fails to

file all of the information required under 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) within 45 days after the date of the filing of

the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day after the date of the filing

of the petition.

Page 1 of 2

Case 19-24331-JKO Doc 41 Filed 02/05/20 Page 1 of 2
 The information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) as provided by the debtor* in this case is complete

to the satisfaction of the trustee and no creditor or other party in interest has filed a request for an order of

dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(2) as provided under Local Rule 1017−2(A)(2). Based upon the

trustee's review, the court has determined that the debtor has complied with the information requirements

of 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. This case is not subject to automatic dismissal under 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(1) or (2).

2. If any creditor or other party in interest has any reason to contest the court's finding that the

debtor has filed all information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1), that party shall file an

objection not later than 21 days from the date of the entry of this Order, and serve such

objection on the trustee, the United States Trustee, debtor, and debtor's counsel, if any. The

objection should specifically identify the information and document(s) required by 11 U.S.C.

§521(a)(1) that the debtor has failed to file.

3. Each creditor or other party in interest served with this Order who does not file an objection

within the 21 day deadline set forth above has waived the right to file a motion to dismiss this

bankruptcy case for the debtor's failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

4. Nothing in this Order shall excuse the debtor's duty to cooperate with the United States

Trustee and the trustee assigned to this case, and shall not prevent the United States Trustee

or case trustee from requesting by any authorized means, including, but not limited to motion,

that the debtor supply further information.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

* All references to "debtor" shall include and refer to both of the debtors in a case filed jointly by two

individuals.

Page 2 of 2

Case 19-24331-JKO Doc 41 Filed 02/05/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4893 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4893

 To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
           to prohibit the use of guarantee fees as offsets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2016

 Mr. Sanford (for himself, Mr. Sherman, and Mr. Neugebauer) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and 
    in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 
           to prohibit the use of guarantee fees as offsets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Risk Management and Homeowner 
Stability Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING THE USE OF GUARANTEE FEES AS OFFSETS.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

           ``prohibiting the use of guarantee fees as offsets

    ``Sec. 316.  (a) In the Senate or the House of Representatives, if 
a bill, resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report includes a 
provision that increases, or extends the increase of, the guarantee 
fees of an enterprise, the chair of the Committee on the Budget of the 
applicable House shall not count the budgetary effects of such 
provision for purposes of title III and title IV of the Congressional 
Budget and Impoundment Act of 1974, the Rules of the House of 
Representatives, and applicable provisions of concurrent resolutions on 
the budget.
    ``(b) The evaluation under subsection (a) shall not apply to any 
legislation that provides for an increase, or extension of an increase, 
of any guarantee fee of an enterprise to be used for the purpose of 
financing reforms to the secondary mortgage market.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents set forth in 
section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 
1974 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 315 the 
following new item:

``Sec. 316. Prohibiting the use of guarantee fees as offsets.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40418]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT of NUECES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 13th day of

November, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

GARY PARKER, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00128-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 12-CR-2371-E (S2))

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 6th day of April, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989 - Earth structures and engineering characterization of ground motion      

      January 1, 1998    

This chapter contains two papers that summarize the performance of engineered earth structures, dams and stabilized excavations in soil, and two papers that characterize for engineering purposes the attenuation of ground motion with distance during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Documenting the field performance of engineered structures and confirming empirically based predictions of ground motion are critical for safe and cost effective seismic design of future structures as well as the retrofitting of existing ones.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Hazards Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

twoods@usgs.gov

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Loma Prieta
                  - california

View All **
Order entered March 26, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00894-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

KRISTINA KASTL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-01374-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 24, 2014 motion requesting (1) reconsideration of 

this Court’s order denying production of the tape recording of the May 31, 2013 hearing, (2) that 

a supplemental reporter’s record be filed containing the exhibits admitted into evidence at that 

hearing, and (3) an extension of time to file his brief. We DENY appellant’s motion to the 

extent he asks this Court to reconsider its previous ruling regarding production of the tape 

recording. 

In an order dated December 17, 2013, the Court ordered Vikki Ogden, Official Court 

Reporter for County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County, Texas, to file a supplemental 

reporter’s record containing the exhibits admitted into evidence at the May 31, 2013 hearing. 
The requested supplemental reporter’s record was filed on December 20, 2013. Accordingly, we 

DENY the motion as moot with respect to supplementing the reporter’s record with the exhibits.

We DENY appellant’s motion to the extent he requests an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellant’s brief is due May 1, 2014. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifying site effects and their influence on earthquake source parameter estimations using a dense array in Oklahoma      

      August 31, 2023    

We investigate the effects of site response on source parameter estimates using earthquakes recorded by the LArge-n Seismic Survey in Oklahoma (LASSO). While it is well known that near-surface unconsolidated sediments can cause an apparent breakdown of earthquake self-similarity, the influence of laterally varying site conditions remains unclear. We analyze site conditions across the 1825-station array on a river plain within an area of 40 km by 23 km using vertical ground motions from 14 regional earthquakes. While the source radiation pattern controls P-wave ground motions below 8 Hz, the surface geology correlates with P-wave ground motions above 8 Hz and S-wave ground motions at 2–21 Hz. Stations installed in alluvial sediments have vertical ground motions that can exceed three times the array median. We use the variation of ground motion of regional earthquakes across the array as a proxy for site effects. The corner frequencies and stress drops of local earthquakes (ML = 0.01–3) estimated using a standard single-spectra approach show negative correlations with the site-effect proxy, while the seismic moments show positive correlations. In contrast, the spectral-ratio approach effectively shows no correlation. The overall bias is small as expected for this relatively homogeneous structure; accurate estimation of site-related biases requires at least 30 stations. Correcting for site-related biases reduces the standard deviations of the source parameters by less than 13% of the total variations. Remaining variations are partially associated with source directivity and model misfits— as small earthquakes can have complex ruptures.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Elizabeth S Cochran

##### Res. Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

ecochran@usgs.gov

626-583-7238

## Related Content

#### Elizabeth S Cochran

##### Res. Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

ecochran@usgs.gov

626-583-7238

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oklahoma

View All **
James Henry FLOYD, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor Trustee to Bank of America, N.A., as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Trustee, etc., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Principal facts for gravity stations in the La Sal Mountains area, Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah, and Mesa and Montrose Counties, Colorado      

      January 1, 1971    

Observed gravity values, station locations, terrain corrections, and Bouguer gravity data are provided as computer printout tabulations for the La Sal Mountains area, Utah-Colorado.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - La Sal Mountains
                  - Utah;Colorado
                  - Utah
                  - Colorado

View All **
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April 15,      2010 | By:    |   /s/      David L. Young |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | David      L. Young,                |
|                                 |   | Principal      Financial Officer    |
|                                 |   |                                |
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

TiVo Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the registration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-146156, 333-113719, 333-112836, 333-106731, 333-103002, 333-100894, 333-92028, and 333-69530) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-146998, 333-135754, 333-112838, 333-106251, 333-101045, 333-94629, and
333-69512) of TiVo Inc. of our reports dated April 1, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TiVo Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009, which reports appear in the
January 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of TiVo Inc.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP             
|                         
|Mountain View, California
|                         
|April 1, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Paleomagnetism and geochronology of 23 Ma gabbroic intrusions in the Keku Strait, Alaska, and implications for the Alexander Terrane      

      January 1, 1992    

Samples of Tertiary gabbro from 24 sites in the Keku Strait, Alaska, help constrain the displacement history of the Alexander terrane. Step heating experiments on a plagioclase separate from these previously undated intrusions indicate a discordant 40Ar/39Ar age of 23.1 ± 1.7 Ma. The characteristic magnetization resides in magnetite, is easily isolated by thermal and alternating field demagnetization, and has both normal and reversed polarities. The mean paleomagnetic pole, with no structural correction, is latitude 87.1°N, longitude 141.6°E, A95 = 10.1°, with N = 20 sites. This pole indicates insignificant tectonic displacement (0.5° ± 8.2° southward) and rotation (0.6° ± 15.2° counterclockwise). We therefore conclude that any northward displacement or vertical axis rotation of the Alexander terrane, and/or tilting in the vicinity of the Keku Strait must have occurred before 23 Ma.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

## Related Content

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Keku Strait
                  - Alaska
                  -  Port Camden

View All **