alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Dean Becker certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of CoConnect, Inc. (formerly Advanced Wireless Communications, Inc.).  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Dean Becker Dean Becker, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  November 16, 2006
# L_2004365EN.01000901.xml

| 10.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 365/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 365/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2101/2004

of 9 December 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 14th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 14th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 45,547 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AKIL TYMES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1051

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

.

Akil Tymes, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIA M.

AFFIRMED.

B. L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Quick-Med
      Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, J. Ladd Greeno, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      my
      knowledge:





|(a) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated:
      September 28, 2007     /s/
      J.
      Ladd Greeno


J.
      Ladd Greeno


Chief
      Executive
      Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HAROLD L. WILBORN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 21

- 56391
D.C. No. 3:20

- cv - 01981

- LAB

- BGS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022 * *
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE , Circuit Judges. Harold L. Wilborn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his employment action alleging various constitutional and Title VII
violations

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish , 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 56391

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Sommatino v. United States , 255 F.3d 704, 707 (9th Cir. 2001) (su

bject matter jurisdiction)

. We affirm.
T he district court properly dismissed Wilborn’s constitutional claims as barred by sovereign immunity and because the Civil Service Reform Act precludes him from “seeking injunctive relief for his asserted constitutional injury just as it precludes him from bringing a Bivens action for damages.” Saul v. United States , 928 F .2d 829, 843 (9th Cir. 1991); Gilbert v. DaGrossa , 756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir. 1985) (stating that the United States is immune from suit unless it has expressly waived its sovereign immunity, and “sovereign immunity cannot be avoided by naming officers a nd employees of the United States as defendants”). The district court properly dismissed Wilborn’s Title VII retaliation claim because Wilborn failed to allege facts sufficient to show there was a causal relationship between any protected activity and a m aterially adverse employment
action. See Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles , 349 F.3d 634, 642, 646 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth elements of Title VII retaliation claim and explaining what constitutes an adverse employment action).
The district court di d not abuse its discretion by denying Wilborn’s request
for leave to file a sur

- reply opposing defendant ’s motion to dismiss because Wilborn did not raise any new evidence or new arguments

. See Preminger v.
Peake , 552 F.3d 757, 769 n.11 (9th Cir. 2008) ( standard of review for a district3 21

- 56391

court’s decisions concerning its management of litigation )

. We reject as unsupported by the record Wilborn’s contentions that the district court was biased against him and that he was denied due process.
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments or allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED
.
Thomas Lee EDWARDS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 165 (Friday, August 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10825]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 165 / Friday, August 25, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 44387]]


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. 28272; Notice No. 95-9]
RIN 2120-AF21


Revision of Emergency Evacuation Demonstration Procedures To 
Improve Participant Safety

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-17392 beginning on page 36932 in the 
issue of Tuesday, July 18, 1995, make the following corrections:

Appendix J to Part 25 [Corrected]

    On page 36936, in the third column, in Appendix J to Part 25, in 
paragraph (o), in the second line, ``closure'' should read 
``disclosure''; and in paragraph (p), in the sixth line, ``exists'' 
should read ``exits''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 58134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-11124]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 226 / Friday, November 24, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 58134]]


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; Proposed 
Priorities

Correction

    In notice document 95-27508 beginning on page 56192 in the issue of 
November 7, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 56192, in the first column, in the DATES section, in the 
sixth line, ``December 7, 1996'' should read ``December 7, 1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Linking movement and reproductive history of brook trout to assess habitat connectivity in a heterogeneous stream network      

      October 28, 2013    

1. Defining functional connectivity between habitats in spatially heterogeneous landscapes is a particular challenge for small-bodied aquatic species. Traditional approaches (e.g. mark–recapture studies) preclude an assessment of animal movement over the life cycle (birth to reproduction), and movement of individuals may not represent the degree of gene movement for fecund species.We investigated the degree of habitat connectivity (defined as the exchange of individuals and genes between mainstem and tributary habitats) in a stream brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) population using mark–recapture [passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags], stationary PIT-tag antennae and genetic pedigree data collected over 4 years (3425 marked individuals). We hypothesised that: (i) a combination of these data would reveal higher estimates of animal movement over the life cycle (within a generation), relative to more temporally confined approaches, and (ii) movement estimates of individuals within a generation would differ from between-generation movement of genes because of spatial variation in reproductive success associated with high fecundity of this species.Over half of PIT-tagged fish (juveniles and adults) were recaptured within 20 m during periodic sampling, indicating restricted movement. However, continuous monitoring with stationary PIT-tag antennae revealed distinct peaks in trout movements in June and October–November, and sibship data inferred post-emergence movements of young-of-year trout that were too small to be tagged physically. A combination of these methods showed that a moderate portion of individuals (28–33%) moved between mainstem and tributary habitats over their life cycle.Patterns of reproductive success varied spatially and temporally. The importance of tributaries as spawning habitat was discovered by accounting for reproductive history. When individuals born in the mainstem reproduced successfully, over 50% of their surviving offspring were inferred to have been born in tributaries. This high rate of gene movement to tributaries was cryptic, and it would have been missed by estimates based only on movement of individuals.This study highlighted the importance of characterising animal movement over the life cycle for inferring habitat connectivity accurately. Such movements of individuals can contribute to substantial gene movements in a fecund species characterised by high variation in reproductive success.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

## Related Content

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

### Contacts

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syscan Imaging, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Yim, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ' 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


August 16, 2004
                                               By:    /S/ STEPHEN YIM
                                               ----------------------
                                               Name: Stephen Yim
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer





                                      -29-
<PAGE>
Preflight Checklist

Flight Date: __/__/____ Location ______________

 Windspeed: _________ Temperature: _________

 Pilot: ___________________ Observer: ______________________

1. Charge battery and spares

2. Charge camera

3. Charge smartphone

4. Check/charge batteries in radio, turn on/off

5. Check spare radio batteries (non DX8)

1. Set RTH switch to arm

2. Set flight mode switch to A

3. Assemble camera, wireless camera antenna, and gimbal

4. Attach assembled gimbal to drone

5. Connect control wire to gimbal forward position/middle position if DX8

6. Connect battery, close hatch

7. Place drone nose away from pilot on launch surface

8. Clear launch area of debris

9. Power transmitter

10. Power on drone

11. Check telemetry screens for data on controller

12. Wait for GPS lock (solid green light)

13. Power on camera

14. Power on smartphone control of camera 

15. Function check camera and phone, rotate gimbal, take a picture

1. Clear launch area of spectators

2. Step 5 meters behind drone

3. Visual check of launch area 

4. Power on engines 

5. Set flight mode to AP

6. Announce launch

7. Check that launch area remains clear 

8. Launch to 3 meters

9. Conduct flight

Batteries Used

 Battery 1  Battery 2

 Battery 3  Battery 4

 Battery 5  Battery 6
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4853 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise certain accreditation 

requirements applied under the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. ROSKAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise 

certain accreditation requirements applied under the 

Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Accredi5 tation For Everyone Act of 2016’’ or the ‘‘SAFE Act of 

6 2016’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REVISION OF CERTAIN MEDICARE ACCREDITATION 

8 REQUIREMENTS. 

9 Section 1865 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 1395bb) is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4853 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the 

3 American Osteopathic Association or any other 

4 national’’ and inserting ‘‘a national’’; and 

5 (B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as 

6 follows: 

7 ‘‘(2) In making such a finding, with respect to a na8 tional accreditation body, the Secretary shall consider 

9 whether the accreditation program of such national ac10 creditation body provides reasonable assurance, when 

11 taken as a whole, that the requirements are equivalent to 

12 or exceed the purposes of the conditions of participation 

13 applicable to the provider entity for which the accredita14 tion body has made a request for a finding under para15 graph (1). The Secretary may consider the standards for 

16 accreditation and survey procedures relevant to the pur17 poses of the conditions of participation, and additional fac18 tors such as the ability of the accreditation body to provide 

19 adequate resources for conducting required surveys and 

20 supplying information for use in enforcement activities, its 

21 monitoring procedures for provider entities found out of 

22 compliance with the conditions, and the ability of the ac23 creditation body to provide the Secretary with necessary 

24 data for validation surveys.’’; and 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4853 IH

1 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘the American 

2 Osteopathic Association, or any other national ac3 creditation body’’ and inserting ‘‘any national ac4 creditation body’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Resist-accept-direct (RAD) considerations for climate change adaptation in fisheries: The Wisconsin experience      

      April 5, 2022    

Decision-makers in inland fisheries management must balance ecologically and socially palatable objectives for ecosystem services within financial or physical constraints. Climate change has transformed the potential range of ecosystem services available. The Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) framework offers a foundation for responding to climate-induced ecosystem modification; however, ecosystem trajectories and current practices must be understood to improve future decisions. Using Wisconsin's diverse inland fisheries as a case study, management strategies for recreational and subsistence fisheries in response to climate change were reviewed within the RAD framework. Current strategies largely focus on resist actions, while future strategies may need to shift toward accept or direct actions. A participatory adaptive management framework and co-production of policies between state and tribal agencies could prioritise lakes for appropriate management action, with the goal of providing a landscape of diverse fishing opportunities. This knowledge co-production represents a process of social learning requiring substantial investments of funding and time.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jared J. Homola, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Cooperative Research Units

jhomola@usgs.gov

517-214-7039

#### Holly Embke, Ph.D.

##### Research Fish Biologist

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

hembke@usgs.gov

703-648-5953

## Related Content

#### Jared J. Homola, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Cooperative Research Units

jhomola@usgs.gov

517-214-7039

#### Holly Embke, Ph.D.

##### Research Fish Biologist

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

hembke@usgs.gov

703-648-5953

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Climate Adaptation Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveMS 516Reston, VA20192United States

casc@usgs.gov

(703) 648-5801

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - wisconsin

View All **