alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50824

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS RODRIGUEZ-LAZCANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-829-ALL-EP

--------------------

February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Rodriguez-Lazcano appeals the 51-month term of

imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of

being found in the United States after removal in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rodriguez-Lazcano complains that his sentence

was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based

on his prior removal following an aggravated felony conviction. 

Rodriguez-Lazcano argues that the sentencing provision violates

the Due Process Clause because it permitted the sentencing judge

to find, under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a fact
No. 01-50824 

-2-

which increased the statutory maximum sentence to which he

otherwise would have been exposed. Rodriguez-Lazcano thus

contends that his sentence is invalid and argues that it should

not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed

in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rodriguez-Lazcano acknowledges that his

argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of

the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). RodriguezLazcano’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Trend Micro Incorporated (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 1, 2004



By

/s/ Mahendra NegiName:

Mahendra NegiTitle:

Representative Director, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President (Chief Financial Officer)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3642 

To clarify the scope of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 27, 2012 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. KOHL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To clarify the scope of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Theft of Trade Secrets 

5 Clarification Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 1832(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by strik9 ing ‘‘or included in a product that is produced for or 

10 placed in’’ and inserting ‘‘a product or service used in or 

11 intended for use in’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

63218

Vol. 62, No. 228

Wednesday, November 26, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. 97-5]

Martha Hernandez, M.D.; Reprimand

and Continuation of Registrations with

Restriction

Correction

In notice document 97–29972

beginning on page 61145, in the issue of

Friday, November 14, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 61146, in the second

column, in the first complete paragraph,

in the last line, ‘‘January 1995.’’ should

read ‘‘January 1994.’’

2. On page 61148, in the first column,

in the first complete paragraph, in the

tenth line from the bottom, ‘‘was to

due’’ should read ‘‘was not due’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-39223; File No. SR-SCCP97-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Stock

Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia;

Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule

Change Relating to Revision and

Limitation of Clearing Services

Correction

In notice document 97–27278

beginning on page 53681, in the issue of

Wednesday, October 15, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 53681, in the third column,

the File No. should be as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 3.7

                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS
                                       OF
                            SFBC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                  AS ADOPTED ON

                                December 30, 2003

                              Article III. Officers

     Section  2.  Duties.  The  officers  of this  Corporation  shall  have  the
following duties and such other duties as delegated by the president.

     The chief executive officer of the Corporation shall have general and
active management of the business and affairs of the Corporation subject to the
directions of the Board of Directors.

     The president shall be the chief operating officer of the Corporation, and
shall act whenever the Chief Executive Officer shall be unavailable.

     The vice president of finance shall be the chief financial officer and be
primarily responsible for all filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. He shall furnish at meetings of the Board of Directors, or whenever
requested, a statement of the financial condition of the Corporation and shall
perform such other duties as the bylaws provide or the Board of Directors may
prescribe.

     The chief accounting officer shall keep correct and complete records of
account, showing accurately at all times the financial condition of the
corporation. The chief accounting officer may also be the chief financial
officer. If the chief accounting officer is not also the chief financial
officer, he shall provide assistance to the chief financial officer and act
whenever the chief financial officer shall be unavailable.

     Any other vice president(s) shall perform such duties as may be prescribed
by the Board of Directors or the president and shall act whenever the president
shall be unavailable.

     The secretary shall have custody of and maintain all of the corporate
records except the financial records, shall record the minutes of all meetings
of the stockholders and whenever else required by the Board of Directors or the
president, and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board
of Directors.

     The treasurer shall be the legal custodian of all monies, notes, securities
and other valuables that may from time to time come into the possession of the
Corporation. He shall immediately deposit all funds of the Corporation coming
into his hands in some reliable bank or other depositary to be designated by the
Board of Directors and shall keep this bank account in the name of the
Corporation.
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0590 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0590

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 590/2004 of 30 March 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 as regards the amount of the aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk **

*
Official Journal L 094 , 31/03/2004 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 590/2004

of 30 March 2004

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 as regards the amount of the aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), and in particular Article 15(b) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 2(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 of 10 October 1990 on aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk(2) sets the amount of aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk. In view of the development in the price of casein and caseinates on the Community and world markets, the amount of the aid should be reduced.

(2) Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 should be amended accordingly.

(3) The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article (2)1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90, "EUR 6,30" is hereby replaced by "EUR 6,00".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2) OJ L 279, 11.10.1990, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2208/2003 (OJ L 330, 18.12.2003, p. 19).
EXHIBIT  32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Gary D. Lewis, Chairman of American BioCare, Inc., formerly American Development & Investment Fund, Inc. (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that:





1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th day of August, 2010.





/s/ Gary D. Lewis


By .........................


Gary D. Lewis,


Chairman





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American BioCare, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Terry Jerome FERRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Henry GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1876

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit E Pinnacl X Multirotor Training

Pinnacl X Multirotor Training

Pinnacl X multirotor pilots will be required to take and pass a 4 to 8 hour course involving regulations, 

principles of flight, weather, operations, crash investigation and flight maneuvers. Pinnacl X requires 

that all pilots pass a written exam with a 80 percent score, preflight and inflight tests similar to the 

requirement for manned aircraft. Additionally the pilot must have logged 20 multicopter flight hours 

performing maneuvers at different locations and with distractions, table 1. The errors on the written 

exam must be corrected with a qualified instructor. These requirements are in addition to the FAA 

requirements. Areas that are covered on the exam were determine from the flight testing under COAs 

2013-ESA-89-COA, 2013-ESA-96-COA and 2015-0667 and will be updated as the experience with 

multirotors increases for filming and photos and flight in confined areas. Copies of the lecture notes are 

appended, table 2. The lecture notes will be updated at regular intervals to keep up with the rapid 

changing UAS regulations and technology.

Table 1, Pinnacl X Pilot Proficiency Requirements

Maneuver Maneuver

Takeoff and landing from a 2 ft X 2 ft area in 

manual mode for Chameleon, 3 ft x 3 ft for S1000 

and S900

Demonstration of GPS signal loss and barometric 

pressure loss

Demonstrate inflight checks in all modes Demonstrate piloting ability during distractions

Demonstrate figure eight flight in all modes at 10 

ft AGL, 50 ft AGL and 75 ft AGL

Operate aircraft in all flight modes in box pattern 

flight with aircraft pointing away, facing and on 

port and starboard sides

Recover from an unusual orientation and fly back 

to starting point in manual mode

Demonstrate proper landing procedure in confined 

areas

Demonstrate flight maneuvers indifferent areas

Table 2, Pinnacl X Required Training

Lecture Title FAA Reference

COA Process Exhibit E1

FAA Regulations and Airspace Exhibit E2

Principles of Multirotor Flight Exhibit E3

Weather Exhibit E4

Multirotor Check List Exhibit E5

Multirotor Crash Investigation Exhibit E6

Multirotor Flight Training Exhibit E7

Multirotor Flight in Close Proximity of Structures and 

Power Lines

Exhibit E8

Multorotor Short UAS Check List Exhibit E9
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 14

- 00257

- CV

IN RE Richard THOMAS , Thomas Family Property Company, Ltd., Michael Thomas, and William Thomas

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 15 , 2014

, relator s Richard Thomas, Thomas Family Property Company, Ltd.,

Michael Thomas and William Thomas filed a pet ition for writ of mandamus and motion for

emergency temporary stay of the jury trial set in the underlying proceeding pending a ruling on

the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relator s are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus and the motion for emergency tem porary stay are denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- PC

- 0613, styled In re Estate of Margaret E. Thomas, Deceased and Robert E. Thomas v. Richard W. Thomas, Individually and as Independent E xecutor of the Estate of Margaret E. Thomas, and as Trustee of the Robert E. Thomas Children's Family Trust, and as Trustee of the Pamela T. Sheet ’ s Thomas Children ’ s Trust, and as Trustee of the Thomas Grandchildren ’ s Trust; and Thomas Family Property

Com pany, Ltd. , pending in the Probate Court No

. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer presiding.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mass addition at Mount St. Helens, Washington, inferred from repeated gravity surveys      

      February 1, 2018    

Measurements of subtle changes in the Earth’s gravityfield can provideinformation on the addition/loss of mass (e.g., magma or aqueousfluids) beneath a volcano. In this study, wemeasured gravity at Mount St. Helens from 2010 to 2016 to investigate possible mass changes followingthe 2004–2008 dome-forming eruption. The raw gravity measurements were corrected for changes in themass and shape of Crater Glacier and for deformation of the volcanic edifice to obtain residual gravity values.We found positive residual gravity changes that we interpret as evidence for partial recharge of the magmareservoir that fed the 2004–2008 eruption and/or for accumulation of groundwater in one or more shallowaquifers. Most of the gravity signal can be explained by groundwater accumulation; magma recharge is notrequired. However, there is additional evidence for at least partial recharge from seismic, deformation, andgeochemical observations

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Maurizio Battaglia

##### Research Geophysicist

California Volcano Observatory

mbattaglia@usgs.gov

650-439-2629

#### Michael Poland

##### Scientist in Charge

Yellowstone Volcano Observatory

mpoland@usgs.gov

360-993-8900

#### Angie Diefenbach

##### Volcanologist - VDAP

Volcano Hazards Program

##### VSC UAS Project Lead

Cascades Volcano Observatory

adiefenbach@usgs.gov

360-993-8957

####             Jeff Wynn, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geophysicist, Emeritus

Cascades Volcano Observatory

## Related Content

#### Maurizio Battaglia

##### Research Geophysicist

California Volcano Observatory

mbattaglia@usgs.gov

650-439-2629

#### Michael Poland

##### Scientist in Charge

Yellowstone Volcano Observatory

mpoland@usgs.gov

360-993-8900

#### Angie Diefenbach

##### Volcanologist - VDAP

Volcano Hazards Program

##### VSC UAS Project Lead

Cascades Volcano Observatory

adiefenbach@usgs.gov

360-993-8957

####             Jeff Wynn, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geophysicist, Emeritus

Cascades Volcano Observatory

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Mount Saint Helens
                  - Washington

View All **
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas K. Beplate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2005

/s/Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer
| 1.                  | Unless      there is something in the subject or context inconsistent therewith,      capitalized terms appearing in this Agreement shall have the meaning      assigned to them in the EmploymentAgreement |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.                  | The      Executive will be entitled to a special bonus  of 100,000$USD      for his efforts in the knowledge transfer transaction by his business      group (TSG). |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.                  | The      Employment Agreement shall hereby be amended as  follows: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     | Ness AT Ltd.       |                                               |
|--------------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                     |               |                                               |   |
| DATE:      April 1, 2007 | By:                | /s/      Aharon Fogel                              |   |
|                     |               | Name:      Aharon      Fogel                  |   |
|                     |               | Title:        Chairman      of the Board |   |
|                     |               |                                               |   |
|                     |               | /s/      Issachar Gerlitz                          |   |
|                     |               | Name: Issachar      Gerlitz                   |   |
|                     |               | Title:       President      and CEO           |   |
|                     |               |                                               |   |
|                     | The      Executive |                                               |
|                     |               |                                               |   |
| DATE:      April 1, 2007 |               | /s/      Michael Zinderman                         |   |
|                     |               | Michael      Zinderman                             |   |

----