alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

SONIA VALES,

Debtor.

/

Case No.: 19-25851-AJC

Chapter: 13

AGREED ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO ALLOW LATE FILED PROOF OF CLAIM (CLAIM # 5-1)

THIS CASE came before the Court upon the Motion to Allow Late Filed Proof of Claim 

(Claim # 5-1) filed by New Residential Mortgage, LLC as serviced by NewRez LLC DBA 

Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (the “Secured Creditor”) (the “Motion”) (Doc. No. 45), and the 

Court, having reviewed the Motion and the file and noting the agreement of the parties, and 

being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is 

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 24, 2020.

Case 19-25851-AJC Doc 53 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED:

1. The Motion is Granted.

2. Claim 5-1 is allowed as timely filed. 

###

Submitted by:

Melbalynn Fisher

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC

110 S.E. 6th Street, Suite 2400

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: 954-526-5846

Fax: 954-526-5846

Email: melbalynn.fisher@mccalla.com 

Copies to:

Melbalynn Fisher, Esq.

Attorney Fisher is directed to serve copies of this order on all interested parties and to file a 

certificate of service as required under Local Rule 2002-1(F).

Case 19-25851-AJC Doc 53 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
NATIONAL COAL CORP. on Form S-3 (File Nos.  333-120146 and  333-134147) and Form
S-8 (File Nos.  333-115649 and 333-123184) of our report dated February 17, 2006
on the  consolidated  balance  sheet of NATIONAL  COAL CORP.  as of December 31,
2005,  and the related  consolidated  statements of  operations,  cash flows and
changes in stockholders'  equity for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Gordon, Hughes & Banks, LLP
-------------------------------
GORDON, HUGHES & BANKS, LLP

Greenwood Village, Colorado
April 2, 2007
In the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT for the

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 18-19121-RAM

In re: CHAPTER 11

1 Global Capital, LLC,

Debtor.

/

1 Global Capital, LLC,

Plaintiff, ADV. NO. 19-01504-RAM

vs.

Maurino Gonzalez 

d/b/a Covenant Contractors, LLC,

Defendant.

/

AFFIDAVIT OF MAURINO GONZALEZ

IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT

BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary, this day appeared Maurino Gonzalez, who being first

placed under oath stated:

1. I am the Defendant named in the above titled action.

2. I have read the answer and affirmative defenses filed on my behalf in this action and I state

that the factual statements made therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and

ability.

3. Soon after the time I first received papers in this action, I was very upset and distracted by 

news that my father had cancer which greatly upset me because my mother had just passed

away over the summer and of course our family was very shaken by those events. It seemed

that I was rushing with matters in order to address what I then considered to be the more

pressing needs of my family. 

4. While I realize now that I should have very closely read the complaint and immediately 

hired counsel to represent me, I was under the mistaken belief that the pretrial date set by the

court was the final date for responding to the complaint and thus I believed that I had up to

Case 19-01504-RAM Doc 15-1 Filed 01/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01504-RAM Doc 15-1 Filed 01/16/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
10.31





EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AMENDMENT





THIS AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of
April 14, 2008 between FindEx.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
“Corporation”), and Steven Malone (“Officer”) as a term extension to the
previous Employment Agreement originally entered into on July 25,
2003.





R E C I T A L S





A.
            Officer
      desires to remain employed by the Corporation as Chief Executive Officer
      pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement
      dated July 25, 2003.





B.
            The
      Corporation desires to employ Officer in such capacity pursuant to the
      terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement dated July 25,
      2003.





THE
PARTIES AGREE to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for a period of two
years from this date. All terms and conditions set forth in the Employment
Agreement dated July 25, 2003 shall remain in effect for the additional two-year
term extension.





WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the day and
year first above written.











OFFICER:








/s/ Steven
Malone


Steven Malone








COMPANY:








/s/ Kirk R.
Rowland


Kirk R. Rowland


FindEx.com, Inc.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN RE: CASE NO: 19-21400-RAM

JUAN M CABRERA HERNANDEZ

Debtor(s)

 /

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO EXEMPTIONS (POST CONFIRMATION)

AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING

Nancy K Neidich, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee ("Trustee") files this Objection to

Exemptions (Post Confirmation) and states as follows: 

1) Nancy K Neidich, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, objects to the exemption of property

as stated in the debtor(s)' Schedules as being over the legal limit and/or raising a question as to

the amount of the claimed exemption and therefore it does not appear that the debtors are entitled

to same and therefore excessive or inappropriate exemptions should be stricken and disallowed. 

2) Objecting specifically as the Debtor is exempting an previously undisclosed lawsuit

identified as Juan Cabrera Gonzalez vs Geovera Specialty Insurance Company, Case No:

2020-016046-CA-01

3) The Trustee has not received any information as to the basis of the lawsuit.

4) If the lawsuit is for the repair of the debtor's homestead property, any award that is not

to be used to perform post petition repairs to the home should not be exempt.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

By: /s/___________________

Amy E. Carrington, Esq.

Senior Staff Attorney

 FLORIDA BAR NO: 101877

Case 19-21400-RAM Doc 43 Filed 12/15/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Objection to Exemptions and the

Notice of Hearing was served through NEF on Robert Sanchez, Esq debtor's attorney on

December 15, 2020

/s/ 

Amy E Carrington, Esq

Case 19-21400-RAM Doc 43 Filed 12/15/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50303]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 11 and 121

[Docket No. 28060; Amdt. No. 1-39, 11-38; SFAR 38-2]
RIN 2120-AF59


Public Aircraft Definition and Exemption Authority

Correction

    In rule document 95-1744 beginning on page 5074 in the issue of 
Wednesday, January 25, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 11.25  [Corrected]

    1. On page 5075, in the third column, in Sec. 11.25(b)(6)(i)(B), in 
the third line, ``safety'' should read ``safe''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in amendatory instruction 
6., in the first line ``SAFAR'' should read ``SFAR''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4761 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, California, as the ‘‘Louis 

Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2016 

Ms. JUDY CHU of California (for herself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. BERA, Mr. COOK, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. 

PELOSI, Ms. LEE, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. COSTA, 

Mr. HONDA, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. FARR, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. SHERMAN, 

Mr. AGUILAR, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. 

BECERRA, Mrs. TORRES, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. BASS, Mr. ROYCE, Ms. ROYBALALLARD, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California, Ms. HAHN, 

Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. PETERS, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. NUNES, Mr. 

MCCARTHY, Mr. KNIGHT, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. 

CALVERT, Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of 

California, Mr. ISSA, and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, 

California, as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4761 IH

1 SECTION 1. LOUIS VAN IERSEL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Si4 erra Madre, California, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post 

10 Office’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30110]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 20-14645-AJC Doc 2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-14645-AJC Doc 2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 2
Armani Markell WARD v. STATE

CR-15-1328

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6945

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY GRANDISON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-82-501-JH, CA-97-1303-AW) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se. Juliet Ann Eurich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s judgment is marked as “filed” on March 26, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 27, 1998. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), it is the date that the judgment was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Grandison seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grandison , Nos. CR-82-501-JH; CA-97-1303-AW (D. Md. Mar. 27 and Apr. 16, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,870                     359
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           682                     682
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,552)                  (1,041)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      777                     817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (777)                   (817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (777)                   (817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (777)                   (817)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)                  (.001)



</TABLE>
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

7288

Vol. 60, No. 25

Tuesday, February 7, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Parts 611, 672, and 676

[Docket No. 941249–4349; I.D. 112894C]

Foreign Fishing; Groundfish of the

Gulf of Alaska; Limited Access

Management of Federal Fisheries In

and Off of Alaska

Correction

In rule document 94–31399 beginning

on page 65975, in the issue of Thursday,

December 22, 1994, make the following

correction.

On page 65979, Table 4 is corrected

to read as set forth below:

TABLE 4.—PRELIMINARY 1995 ALLOCATION

(METRIC TONS) OF PACIFIC COD IN THE GULF

OF ALASKA; ALLOCATIONS TO INSHORE AND

OFFSHORE COMPONENTS

Regulatory area TAC

Component Allocation

Inshore

(90%)

Offshore

(10%)

Western ......................... 29,900 26,910 2,990

Central .......................... 68,000 61,200 6,800

Eastern .......................... 5,100 4,590 510

Total ................... 103,000 92,700 10,300

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. PR95-4-000]

Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corporation;

Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

Correction

In notice document 95–1922

appearing on page 5172 in the issue of

Thursday, January 26, 1995, the docket

line should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Recruitment bottlenecks for age-0 walleye in northern Wisconsin lakes      

      October 21, 2021    

Some northern Wisconsin lakes have shown declines in catches of age-0 Walleye Sander vitreus in standardized fall electrofishing sampling, suggesting that recruitment bottlenecks are occurring in the first several months of life. In 2016 and 2017, we sampled six lakes with declining trends in natural Walleye recruitment (D-NR lakes) and seven lakes with a history of sustained natural recruitment (S-NR lakes) to determine if timing of potential recruitment bottlenecks for age-0 Walleye were consistent among D-NR lakes and if abiotic and biotic metrics differed between D-NR and S-NR lakes. We also examined diets of larval Walleye to assess prey items that may be important to early growth and survival and to determine if occurrence of piscivory was related to larval Walleye total length. Differential patterns in the presence and absence of age-0 Walleye at different life history stages in the first 6 months of life suggested that recruitment bottlenecks in D-NR lakes were consistently occurring before mid-July (five of six lakes). Mean Secchi depth, surface conductivity, abundance of larval Yellow Perch Perca flavescens, and most metrics of zooplankton abundance and mean size were similar between D-NR and S-NR lakes. Log10 transformed number of adult Walleye per hectare was lower and adult mean total length was higher in D-NR lakes. Across all lakes, diets of larval Walleye consisted of zooplankton and larval fish and the occurrence of piscivory was higher than reported in previous studies and was positively related to total length of larval Walleye. Causes of recruitment bottlenecks in D-NR lakes remain unclear, making it difficult to identify management actions that might be implemented to circumvent these bottlenecks. However, our results indicate that future research should focus on the period between egg deposition and mid-July.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - wisconsin

View All **
Vista 10-Q








Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vista International Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


VISTA INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Thomas P. PfistererThomas P. PfistererChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Freestone Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clayton Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, James Carroll, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Clayton CarterClayton Carter

Chief Executive Officer

September
28, 2011





/s/ James CarrollJames Carroll

Chief Financial Officer

September
28, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 50829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: R1-23630]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[PA-4139a; FRL-7061-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; VOC and NO<INF>X</INF> RACT Determinations for Five 
Individual Sources Located in the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Area; 
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule; Republication

    Editorial Note: On Thursday, September 27, 2001, this rule 
document FR Doc. 01-23630 appeared at 66 FR 49292-49293. Due to 
numerous errors it is being reprinted in its entirety.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to receipt of a letter of adverse comment, EPA is 
withdrawing the direct final rule to approve revisons which establish 
reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for five 
major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides 
(NO<INF>X</INF>) located in the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley ozone 
nonattainment area. In the direct final rule published on August 21, 
2001 (66 FR 43779), EPA stated that if it received adverse comment by 
September 20, 2001, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. 
EPA subsequently received adverse comments from the Citizens for 
Pennsylvania's Future (PennFuture). EPA will address the comments 
received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action 
also published on August 21, 2001 (66 FR 43822). EPA will not institute 
a second comment period on this action.

DATES: The Direct final rule is withdrawn as of September 27, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold A. Frankford at (215) 814-2108.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 14, 2001.
James W. Newson,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    Accordingly, the addition of Sec. 52.2020(c)(173) is withdrawn as 
of September 27, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-23630 Filed 9-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

    Editorial Note: On Thursday, September 27, 2001, this rule 
document FR Doc 01-23630 appeared at 66 FR 49292-49293. Due to 
numerous errors it is being reprinted in its entirety.

[FR Doc. R1-23630 Filed 10-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 48 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 48 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 48 Filed 04/13/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 48 Filed 04/13/20 Page 4 of 4