alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A

- CR

- 2819 | July 16, 2019 Page 1 of 2



### MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

A TTORNEY FOR A PPELLANT Andrew Bernlohr Indianapolis, Indiana A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General George P. Sherman Supervising Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana



### I N T H E 

# COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Michael Hicks , Appellant

- Defendant,

v.


### State of Indiana , Appellee

- Plaintiff July 16, 2019 Court of Appeals Ca se No. 18A

- CR

- 2819 Appeal from the Marion Superior Court The Honorable David Hooper, Magistrate The Honorable Amy M. Jones, Judge Trial Court Cause No. 49G08

- 1805

- CM

- 16082

Vaidik, Chief Judge.Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A

- CR

- 2819 | July 16, 2019 Page 2 of 2

[1] Michael Hicks contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass for knowingly entering Meadowlark Apartments in May 2018 after having been denied entry. At a bench trial, the State presented evidence that Hick s signed an “Official Ban/No Trespass Notice” in April 2018, which stated that Hicks was banned from Meadowlark Apartments “ for life ” and would be subject to arrest for criminal trespass if he returned. Ex. 1

. At trial, Hicks admitted that he signed the trespass notice but claimed that after signing it , he met with a manager of the apartments and was left “under the impression” that he was not actually banned from the property. Tr. p. 31. The judge , however, discredited Hicks’ testimony and found him gu ilty of criminal trespass. On appeal, Hicks repeats
his claim that he did not think he was banned from Meadowlark Apartments because of the meeting he had with the manager. This argument is nothing more than an invitation to judge the credibility of the witness, which we decline
to do. See Leonard v. State , 80 N.E.3d 878, 882 (Ind. 2017). We therefore affirm Hicks’ conviction.

[2] Affirmed.

Kirsch, J., and Altice, J., concur

.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Social.Water - A crowdsourcing tool for environmental data acquisition      

      January 1, 2012    

Remote telemetry has a long history of use for collection of environmental measurements. With the rise of mobile phones and SMS text-messaging capacity, many members of the general pubic carry communications equipment in their pockets at all times. Enabling the general public to provide environmental data through text messages has the potential both to provide additional data to scientific projects and also to raise awareness of the projects through participation. Hydrologic measurements – some of which can be made without training, involve a single measurement, and are often made in rural areas – are well-suited to text-message conveyance. Many other environmental measurements are similarly well-suited for this technology. Social.Water is a software package, written in Python, that collects, parses, and categorizes text messages sent to a dedicated phone number, updates a simple database, and posts both graphical results and the database on the Web. Social.Water was designed as the backend to the Crowdhydrology project and is written in an object-oriented design that makes customization and modification straightforward.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael N Fienen

##### Research Hydrologist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

mnfienen@usgs.gov

608-821-3894

## Related Content

#### Michael N Fienen

##### Research Hydrologist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

mnfienen@usgs.gov

608-821-3894

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Elena Herrera Salas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00112-CR

Trial court case number: 2235783

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 15 of Harris County

This is an appeal from the denial of an application for habeas corpus. Rule 31.1 provides 

that when an appellate court receives the record, it may set the time for filing briefs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 31.1. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief within 20 days of the date of this order. 

The state’s brief will be due 20 days after appellant’s brief is filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Justice Richard Hightower_______________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __March 5, 2019___
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Quest Oil Corporation, a Nevada
      corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, James B. Panther, II, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------










/s/
      James B. Panther, II


James
      B.
      Panther, II


President


Chief
      Executive Officer





August
      17, 2006
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50798

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE JUAN SERRANO-MEZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:07-CR-979-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Juan Serrano-Meza appeals the 70-month within-guidelines sentence

imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable

because the illegal reentry guidelines double count a defendant’s criminal record,

resulting in a sentencing range that is greater than necessary to meet the goals

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He also argues that this court should not afford his

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50798

2

sentence a presumption of reasonableness because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not

empirically based. He contends that his sentence failed to reflect that he had no

prior immigration convictions, that he did not realize he faced such a high

sentence, that the longest sentence he had served was three years, and that he

reentered this country to work.

Serrano-Meza’s challenge to the presumption of reasonableness is

foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009),

cert. denied, 2009 WL 3162196 (Oct. 5, 2009) (No. 09-6195); see also United

States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied,

2009 WL 1849974 (Oct. 5, 2009) (No. 08-11099). We have also rejected the

argument that using a prior conviction to increase the offense level and in

calculating criminal history is impermissible “double counting.” See United

States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir. 2001).

Serrano-Meza has not rebutted the presumption that the district court

sentenced him to a reasonable, properly calculated within-guidelines sentence.

See United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 129 S. Ct. 328 (2008); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554-55 (5th

Cir. 2006). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-8154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HENRY OLUSHOLA OBOH, aka Henry Osa Omoboh, aka James Clark aka Derick Forest, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

-------------------------- ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion September 29, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, F.2d ) (November 13, 1995) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.*
B Y T H E C O U R T : A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED. *Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Albert J. Henderson has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §46(c).
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Occupancy patterns of regionally declining grassland sparrow populations in a forested Pennsylvania landscape      

      June 1, 2014    

Organisms can be affected by processes in the surrounding landscape outside the boundary of habitat areas and by local vegetation characteristics. There is substantial interest in understanding how these processes affect populations of grassland birds, which have experienced substantial population declines. Much of our knowledge regarding patterns of occupancy and density stem from prairie systems, whereas relatively little is known regarding how occurrence and abundance of grassland birds vary in reclaimed surface mine grasslands. Using distance sampling and single-season occupancy models, we investigated how the occupancy probability of Grasshopper (Ammodramus savannarum) and Henslow's Sparrows (A. henslowii) on 61 surface mine grasslands (1591 ha) in Pennsylvania changed from 2002 through 2011 in response to landscape, grassland, and local vegetation characteristics . A subset (n = 23; 784 ha) of those grasslands were surveyed in 2002, and we estimated changes in sparrow density and vegetation across 10 years. Grasshopper and Henslow's Sparrow populations declined 72% and 49%, respectively from 2002 to 2011, whereas overall woody vegetation density increased 2.6 fold. Henslow's Sparrows avoided grasslands with perimeter–area ratios ≥0.141 km/ha and woody shrub densities ≥0.04 shrubs/m2. Both species occupied grasslands ≤13 ha, but occupancy probability declined with increasing grassland perimeter–area ratio and woody shrub density. Grassland size, proximity to nearest neighboring grassland ( = 0.2 km), and surrounding landscape composition at 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 km were not parsimonious predictors of occupancy probability for either species. Our results suggest that reclaimed surface mine grasslands, without management intervention, are ephemeral habitats for Grasshopper and Henslow's Sparrows. Given the forecasted decline in surface coal production for Pennsylvania, it is likely that both species will continue to decline in our study region for the foreseeable future.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Duane Diefenbach, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

drd11@usgs.gov

814-865-4511

## Related Content

#### Duane Diefenbach, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

drd11@usgs.gov

814-865-4511

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Shallow fault slip of the 2020 M5.1 Sparta, North Carolina, earthquake      

      September 11, 2023    

The 2020 M 5.1 Sparta, North Carolina, earthquake is the largest in the eastern United States since the 2011 M 5.8 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake and produced a ∼2.5‐km‐long surface rupture, unusual for an event of this magnitude. A geological field study conducted soon after the event indicates oblique slip along a east‐southeast‐trending fault with a consistently observed thrust component. My analysis of regional seismic waveforms, Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar, and Global Positioning System survey data yields a compact shallow rupture extending from Earth’s surface down‐dip to the southwest over a ∼3 km fault length. The inferred kinematic rupture is primarily toward the up‐dip and eastward along‐strike directions and has predominantly thrust motion in the west, transitioning to roughly equal thrust and left‐lateral strike‐slip motion in the east. No normal faulting component, as proposed in an earlier geophysical study, is necessary to explain the data. The prevalence of only dip‐slip motions observed at Earth’s surface may demand slip partitioning between dip slip and lateral motions at depth.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Fred F Pollitz

##### Supervisory Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

fpollitz@usgs.gov

650-329-4821

## Related Content

#### Fred F Pollitz

##### Supervisory Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

fpollitz@usgs.gov

650-329-4821

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Carolina
                  -  Virginia
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Interannual climate variability and snowpack in the western United States      

      January 1, 1996    

An important part of the water supply in the western United States is derived from runoff fed by mountain snowmelt Snow accumulation responds to both precipitation and temperature variations, and forms an interesting climatic index, since it integrates these influences over the entire late fall-spring period. Here, effects of cool season climate variability upon snow water equivalent (SWE) over the western part of the conterminous United States are examined. The focus is on measurements on/and 1 April, when snow accumulation is typically greatest. The primary data, from a network of mountainous snow courses, provides a good description of interannual fluctuations in snow accumulations, since many snow courses have records of five decades or more. For any given year, the spring SWE anomaly at a particular snow course is likely to be 25%–60% of its long-term average. Five separate regions of anomalous SWE variability are distinguished, using a rotated principal components analysis. Although effects vary with region and with elevation, in general, the anomalous winter precipitation has the strongest influence on spring SWE fluctuations. Anomalous temperature has a weaker effect overall, but it has great influence in lower elevations such as in the coastal Northwest, and during spring in higher elevations. The regional snow anomaly patterns are associated with precipitation and temperature anomalies in winter and early spring. Patterns of the precipitation, temperature, and snow anomalies extend over broad regional areas, much larger than individual watersheds. These surface anomalies are organized by the atmospheric circulation, with primary anomaly centers over the North Pacific Ocean as well as over western North America. For most of the regions, anomalously low SWE is associated with a winter circulation resembling the PNA pattern. With a strong low in the central North Pacific and high pressure over the Pacific Northwest, this pattern diverts North Pacific storms northward, away from the region. Both warm and cool phases of El Niño-Southern Oscillation tend to produce regional patterns with out-of-phase SWE anomalies in the Northwest and the Southwest.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Nevada
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Utah
                  -  Washington
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 11, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10711]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 35796]]


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 436

[FRL-5223-9]


National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and Pretreatment 
Programs; State and Local Assistance Programs; Effluent Limitations 
Guidelines and Standards; Public Water Supply and Underground Injection 
Control Programs: Removal of Legally Obsolete or Redundant Rules

Correction

    In final rule document 95-15027 beginning on page 33926 in the 
issue of Thursday, June 29, 1995 make the following corrections:


Secs. 436.22, 436.32, and 436.42  [Corrected]

    1. On page 33967, in Secs. 436.22, 436.32, and 436.42(a), the 
paragraph designation (a), should be inserted before ``Except''.


Secs. 436.122, 436.132, 436.142, 436.152, 436.182, 436.192, 436.232, 
and 436.242  [Corrected]

    2. On page 33968, in Secs. 436.122, 436.132, 436.142, 436.152, 
436.182, 436.192, 436.232, and 436.242(a), the paragraph designation 
(a), should be inserted before ``Except''.


Secs. 436.252, 436.262, and 436.382  [Corrected]

    3. On page 33969, in Secs. 436.252, 436.262, and 436.382(a), the 
paragraph designation (a), should be inserted before ``Except''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
William ESCOFFERY, Appellant, v. Claude PERRY, Appellee.

No. 1D17-107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Revised magnitude-bound relation for the Wabash Valley seismic zone of the central United States      

      January 1, 2005    

Seismic hazard assessment in the central United States, and in particular the Wabash Valley seismic zone of Indiana-Illinois, frequently relies on empirical estimates of paleoearthquake magnitudes (M). In large part these estimates have been made using the magnitude-bound method. Existing region-specific magnitude-bound relations rely heavily on only a few historical earthquakes in the central United States and eastern Canada that induced reported liquefaction features. Recent seismological studies have suggested smaller magnitudes than previously presumed for some of these earthquakes, however, and other studies have reinterpreted site-to-source distances to liquefaction features associated with some of these earthquakes. In this paper, we re-examine historical earthquakes (M > ∼5) that occurred in the central and eastern United States and eastern Canada; some of these earthquakes triggered liquefaction and others did not. Based on our findings, we reinterpret the region-specific magnitude-bound relation for the Wabash Valley. Using this revised magnitude-bound relation, we present magnitude estimates for four prehistoric earthquakes that occurred in the Wabash Valley seismic zone during Holocene time.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Wabash Valley seismic zone
                  - Illinois
                  -  Indiana

View All **
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

Commission File Number: 333-57027-02

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-4
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			363886007
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

248-643-2530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 1999.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
1999.

Not applicable.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 63 (Monday, April 3, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 16920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40403]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. 93-026-2]


Introduction of Nonindigenous Organisms

Correction

    Proposed rule document 95-6907 was inadvertently published in the 
Notices section of the issue of Tuesday, March 21, 1995, beginning on 
page 14928. It should have appeared in the Proposed Rules section.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40108]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

12 CFR Parts 506, 510, 512, 516, 543, 544, 545, 550, 552, 556, 563, 
563b, 563c, 563d, 565, 566, 567, 571, 574, 575, 583, 584

[No. 95-200]


Technical Amendments; Loans to One Borrower

Correction

    In rule document 95-30541 beginning on page 66714 in the issue of 
Tuesday, December 26, 1995, in the first column, the EFFECTIVE DATE 
should read ``December 26, 1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D