alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Multispecies cccupancy modeling as a tool for evaluating the status and distribution of Darters in the Elk River, Tennessee      

      August 1, 2016    

Sixteen darter species, including the federally endangered Boulder Darter Etheostoma wapiti, are known to occur in the Elk River, a large, flow-regulated tributary of the Tennessee River, Tennessee–Alabama. Since the construction of Tims Ford Dam (TFD) in 1970, habitat modification caused by cold, hypolimnetic water releases and peak-demand hydropower generation has contributed to population declines and range reductions for numerous aquatic species in the main-stem Elk River. We developed Bayesian hierarchical multispecies occupancy models to determine the influence of site- and species-level characteristics on darter occurrence by using presence–absence data for 15 species collected from 39 study sites. Modeling results indicated that large-river obligate species, such as the Boulder Darter, were 6.92 times more likely to occur for every 37-km increase in the distance downstream from TFD. In contrast, small-stream species were 2.35 times less likely and cosmopolitan species were 1.88 times less likely to occur for every 37-km increase in distance downstream from TFD. The probability of occurrence for darter species also had a strong negative relationship with the absence of cobble and boulder substrates and the presence of high silt levels, particularly for species that require boulder substrates during spawning. Although total darter species richness was similar across all 39 sample sites, the composition of darter assemblages varied substantially among locations, presumably due in part to species-specific habitat affinities and hydrothermal conditions. The use of multispecies occupancy models allowed us to account for the incomplete detection of species while estimating the influence of physical habitat characteristics and species traits on darter occurrences, including rarely observed species that would have been difficult to model individually.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Elk River
                  - tennessee

View All **
# L_2004336EN.01003401.xml

| 12.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 336/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 336/34

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1951/2004

of 11 November 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 10 November 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 10 November 2004.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 10 November 2004, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 31,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 November 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 30295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20608]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Potential causes for amphibian declines in Puerto Rico      

      January 1, 2004    

View Full Text

We monitored 11 populations of eight species of Eleutherodactylus in Puerto Rico from 1989 through 2001. We determined relative abundance of active frogs along transects established in the Caribbean National Forest (El Yunque), Carite Forest, San Lorenzo, and in the vicinity of San Juan. Three species (Eleutherodactylus karlschmidti, E. jasperi, and E. eneidae) are presumed to be extinct and eight populations of six different species of endemic Eleutherodactylus are significantly declining at elevations above 400 m. Of the many suspected causes of amphibian declines around the world, we focused on climate change and disease. Temperature and precipitation data from 1970a??2000 were analyzed to determine the general pattern of oscillations and deviations that could be correlated with amphibian declines. We examined a total of 106 tissues taken from museum specimens collected from 1961a??1978 and from live frogs in 2000. We found chytrid fungi in two species collected at El Yunque as early as 1976, this is the first report of chytrid fungus in the Caribbean. Analysis of weather data indicates a significant warming trend and an association between years with extended periods of drought and the decline of amphibians in Puerto Rico. The 1970's and 1990's, which represent the periods of amphibian extirpations and declines, were significantly drier than average. We suggest a possible synergistic interaction between drought and the pathological effect of the chytrid fungus on amphibian populations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Puerto Rico

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Stability of submerged slopes on the flanks of the Hawaiian Islands, a simplified approach      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

Undersea transmission lines and shoreline AC-DC conversion stations and near-shore transmission lines are being considered as part of a system for transporting energy between the Hawaiian Islands. These facilities will need to be designed so that they will not be damaged or destroyed by coastal or undersea landslides. Advanced site surveys and engineering design of these facilities will require detailed site specific analyses, including sediment sampling and laboratory testing of samples, in situ testing of sediment and rock, detailed charting of bathymetry, and two- or three-dimensional numerical analyses of the factors of safety of the slopes against failure from the various possible loading mechanisms. An intermediate approximate approach can be followed that involves gravity and piston cores, laboratory testing and the application of simplified models to determine a seismic angle of repose for actual sediment in the vicinity of the planned facility. An even simpler and more approximate approach involves predictions of angles of repose using classification of the sediment along a proposed route as either a coarse volcaniclastic sand, a calcareous ooze, or a muddy terrigenous sediment. The steepest slope that such a sediment can maintain is the static angle of repose. Sediment may be found on slopes as steep as these, but it must be considered metastable and liable to fail in the event of any disturbance, storm or earthquake. The seismic angle of repose likely governs most slopes on the Hawaiian Ridge. This declivity corresponds to the response of the slope to a continuing seismic environment. As a long history of earthquakes affects the slopes, they gradually flatten to this level. Slopes that exceed or roughly equal this value can be considered at risk to fail during future earthquakes. Seismic and static angles of repose for three sediment types are tabulated in this report.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - hawaii

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 22995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10428]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 22995]]



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 622

[Docket No. 970415091-7091-01;I.D. 033197D]
RIN 0648-AJ88


Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; 
Snapper Grouper Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic States; Black Sea 
Bass Pot Fishery; Control Date

Correction

    In proposed rule document 97-10539 beginning on page 19732 in the 
issue of Wednesday, April 23, 1997 make the following corrections:
    1. On page 19732, in the third column, in the SUMMARY, in the 
seventh line from the bottom, ``[insert date of publication in the 
Federal Register]'' should read ``April 23, 1997''.
    2. On page 19733, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in 
the fifth line, ``[insert date of publication in the Federal 
Register]'' should read ``April 23, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30828]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 895 and 897

[Docket No. 94N-0078]


Medical Devices; Proposed Performance Standards for Electrode 
Lead Wires and Proposed Banning of Unprotected Electrode Lead Wires

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-15086 beginning on page 32406 in the 
issue of Wednesday, June 21, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 32415, in the first column, under X. Request for Comments, 
in the first paragraph, in the second line, ``September 21, 1995'' 
should read ``September 5, 1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00385 - CR MONITA MECHELLE SMIT H, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 181st District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 25,083 - B, Honorable John B. Board, Presiding



### February 4 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Monita Mechelle Smith, appellant, appeals her conviction s for burglary of a building and for credit card or debit card abuse as alleged in a two count indictment
. Appellant pled guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement. Testimony was heard by the trial court and punishment was assessed at ten years for each count to run concurrently. Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders 1 brief, wherein he certifies that, after diligently searching the record, he has

1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 - 45, 87 S.Ct . 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).2

concluded that the appeal is without merit. Along with his brief, he has filed a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing h er of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible error and of appellant’s right to file a pro se response . So too did he represent that the appellate record was provided to appellant. By letter dated December 12, 2014 , this court also notified appellant of h er right to file h er own brief or response by January 12, 2015 , if s he wished to do so. To date, no response has been received. In complianc e with the principles enunciated in Anders , appellate counsel discussed potential areas for appeal which included the guilty plea s, sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction s, the punishment assessed, and the effectiveness of counsel . However, he then explained why the issues lacked merit. In addition, we conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel’s conclusions and to uncover arguable error pursuant to In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) and Sta fford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). After doing so, we concurred with counsel’s conclusions. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment s are affirmed. 2
Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish.

2 Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review with the Court of Criminal Appeals.
STATE EX REL. Freddie WADE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0231

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Shallow marine ecosystem collapse and recovery during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum      

      September 21, 2021    

The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), the most well-studied transient hyperthermal event in Earth history, is characterized by prominent and dynamic changes in global marine ecosystems. Understanding such biotic responses provides valuable insights into future scenarios in the face of anthropogenic warming. However, evidence of the PETM biotic responses is largely biased towards deep-sea records, whereas shallow-marine evidence remains scarce and elusive. Here we investigate a shallow-marine microfaunal record from Maryland, eastern United States, to comprehensively document the shallow-marine biotic response to the PETM. We applied birth-death modeling to estimate the local diversity dynamics, combined with evaluation of time-variable preservation artifacts. We discovered strong increase of species disappearance and appearance predating the onset and at the final recovery phase of the PETM, respectively. Our paleoecological analyses indicate that bathymetric habitat compression due to extreme warmth and oxygen minimum zone expansion caused shallow-marine benthic species extirpation and ecosystem perturbation during the PETM; and that rapid recovery and diversification followed the PETM disaster, thus contributing new understanding to the shallow-marine biotic changes in a broad context of global warming.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Marci M Robinson, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

mmrobinson@usgs.gov

703-648-5291

## Related Content

#### Marci M Robinson, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

mmrobinson@usgs.gov

703-648-5291

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Florence Bascom Geoscience Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

703-648-5953

### Explore Search

                  - Paleoclimate
                  - Climate
                  - United States
                  - Maryland

View All **
Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED \
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Amazon  Biotech,   Inc.,  a  Utah
corporation,  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending July 31, 2005,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Simcha Edell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify the
following  pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Simcha Edell
--------------------------
Simcha Edell
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1584

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Johnny Parker, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: March 14, 2001

Filed: March 16, 2001

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Johnny Parker was arrested after police stopped a car in which he was a passenger; officers found drugs and a methamphetamine lab in the car, syringes and a small vial of drugs on Parker's person, and a .22 caliber pistol on the driver's side floorboard. Parker pleaded guilty to conspiring with the driver to manufacture methamphetamine, and his sentence was based in part on the application of a firearm enhancemen t under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). Parker later obtained partial relief (on another ground) under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court resentenced Parker and-2-

again applied the firearm enhancement, finding possession of a weapon by one actively engaged in manufacturing illegal drugs was reasonably foreseeable.
On appeal, Parker contends the enhancement was improper because charges were dropped against the driver, who possessed the gun, and the government did not prove the driver's possession of the gun was in furtherance of the conspiracy or reasonably foreseeable to Parker. We disagree. Parker admitted he conspired with the driver to manufacture drugs, and there was no indication the gun was not connected with the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), comment. (n.3) (enhancement should be applied if weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that weapon was connected with offense); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3 (specific offense characteristics are determined on basis of all reasonably foreseeable acts of others in jointly undertaken criminal activity if taken in furtherance of jointly undertaken activity); UnitedStates v. Jones , 195 F.3d 379, 384 (8th Cir. 1999) (firearm enhancement properly applied where gun was found in same location as drugs); UnitedStates v. Turpin , 920 F.2d 1377, 1387 (8th Cir. 1990) (noting firearms are tools of drug dealer's trade); cf. UnitedStates v. Barragan , 915 F.2d 1174, 1179 (8th Cir. 1990) (firearm enhancement upheld where defendant was involved in criminal activity with co-defendant who had not been charged on same count). Finding no sentencing error, we affirm the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 77 (Thursday, April 20, 2000)]
[Corrections]
[Page 21239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X00-10420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-42516 / March 10, 2000, File No. 4-430]


Order Extending the Deadline for Compliance with Portions of the 
Commission's January 28, 2000, Order Directing the Exchanges and the 
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. to Submit a 
Decimalization Implementation Plan Pursuant to Section 11A(a)(3)(B) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Correction

    In notice document 00-6608, appearing on page 14637, in the issue 
of Friday, March 17, 2000, make the following correction:
    On page 14637, in the second column, the docket number is corrected 
to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. C0- 6608 Filed 4-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Big Cat Energy Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A1 for the period end of April 30,
2008as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Richard G. Stifel,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated
this 4th day of
May, 2009.








RICK
STIFEL


Rick
Stifel


Principal
Financial Officer
<Page>

         Exhibit
         Number
         -------

         21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF SPECTRUM BANCORPORATION, INC.
<Table>
<Caption>

Name                                                 State of Incorporation
----                                                 ----------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
Great Western Bank                                   Nebraska

F&M Bank                                             South Dakota

Rushmore Bank & Trust                                South Dakota

Citizens Bank, Mt. Ayr                               Iowa

Citizens Bank, Clive                                 Iowa

Citizens Bank of Princeton                           Missouri

Spectrum Banc Service Corporation                    South Dakota

*Spectrum Capital Trust I                            A statutory business trust organized
                                                     under the Delaware Business Trust Act

*Spectrum Capital Trust II                           A statutory business trust organized
                                                     under the Delaware Business Trust Act
</Table>


                                      -57-