alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Charter Environmental, Inc. 

Under Contract No. F A8903-06-D-8503 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 59768 

Peter F. Carr, II, Esq. 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

Boston, MA 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Maj George M. Ebert, USAF 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 3 November 2016 

MARK N. STEMPLER / v 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59768, Appeal of Charter 

Environmental, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology, 1914      

      January 1, 1915    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Earl Lee SUTTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-1259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 13, 2018

Earl Lee Sutton, Carrabelle, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the April 17, 2017 order denying Petitioner's pro se second amended motion for post-conviction relief, filed in Case No. 2009-191-CFAWS in the Seventh Judicial Circuit Court in and for Volusia County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N E D / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T REV ECA FLO RES; M ARTIN FLORE S R AM I RE Z, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72745 A ge nc yN os . A 079- 533- 981

A 079- 533- 980 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R e ve c aF l or e s and M art i n F l or e s R a m i r e z , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pet i t i on pro se f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN ED / Res ea r ch 06- 72745 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , M

a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 3 8 1 F . 3 d9 4 2 , 9 4 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re op en t o app l y f

or re l i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) as un t i m el y bec ause they di d n otfi l e the m ot i on w i thi n 9 0 d ay s of the B IA ’ s f i nal o r d e ro f r e m o v a l, se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , p e titio n e r s f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te m a t e r i a l c hange d c i r c um s t anc e s i n M e xi c o t o qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on to th e tim e lim it, se e 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 . 2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( i i ) , an dth e yd i dn o te s t ab l i s h p r i ma f a c ie e lig ib ilityf

o rr e lie f , se e T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 53 8 F . 3d 98 8, 99 6-97 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( re qu i ri ng m ov antt o est abl i sh pri m a f ac i e e l i gi bi l i ty f

or re l i ef ). W e r e j e c tpe t i t i one r s ’ c ont e nt i on tha tthe r e ar e no t i m e l i m i t s f orf i l i ng a m o tio n to r e o p e n to ap p lyf o rC A T r e lie f

. See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 24, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A0219. JESUS GARIBAY v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On September 13, 2019, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than September 23, 2019. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate 

review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 

264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a 

brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while 

you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's 

failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, 

you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time 

appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will 

have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the 

trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the 

trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days 

from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a 

notice of appeal from that order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 24, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to 

the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy 

of this order to the appellant.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 5, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129114 & (21) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129114 

 COA: 259113 

Genesee CC: 82-031970-FY 

MICHAEL ANTHONY CARROLL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of November 29, 2005, we directed the prosecutor to answer defendant’s 

application. On order of the Court, the prosecutor having filed an answer, the application 

for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered, 

and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing 

entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0329 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 5, 2006 

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 228 (Monday, November 25, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 59930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11125]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 228 / Monday, November 25, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 59930]]



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 94-15]


Michael J. Septer, D.O., Grant of Request To Modify Continuation 
of Registration With Restrictions

Correction

    In notice document 96-26321, beginning on page 53762, in the issue 
of Tuesday, October 15, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 53762, in the second column, in the tenth line 
``825(a)(4)'' should read ``824(a)(4)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                       Ending
Class            Interest         Principal        Losses             Balance
<S>               <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
A1             5526058.24       16047600.8                0       919251397.02
A2             1796169.52      44218946.28                0       349747016.39
A3             5251023.08                0                0         1099000000
B               429007.63                0                0           63161000
IO             2212666.69                0                0                  0
M1              959768.94                0                0          182833000
M2              688270.72                0                0          120309000
M3              152971.62                0                0           27146000
OC                      0                0                0         4484072.41
P               866257.73                0                0                  0
R1                      0                0                0                  0
R2                      0                0                0                  0
R3                      0                0                0                  0
R4                      0                0                0                  0
R5                      0                0                0                  0
SPEC_SERV               0                0                0                  0
X                 1773389                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0418 

BILLY JOE ROGERS, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

FILED 

AUG - 8 2024 

Bowan Greenwood 

Clerk of Suprerne Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Billy Joe Rogers moves this Court for appointment of counsel in this appeal. He 

does not provide any grounds. Rogers is incarcerated in the Crossroads Correctional 

Center in Shelby, Montana. 

We observe that the day after Rogers filed his Notice of Appeal, this Court received 

the record from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Mineral County. On May 1, 2024, the 

District Court issued an Order denying Rogers's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief. 

Rogers is not entitled to court-appointed counsel. Rogers represented himself in the 

District Court. He has not demonstrated the existence of extraordinary circumstances to 

justify appointment of counsel, pursuant to § 46-8-104(3), MCA. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Rogers's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Billy Joe Rogers along with a copy of this Court's Appellate Handbook for reference to 

the Montana Rules of 4pellate Procedure and access to its forms. 

DATED this 8 /--day of August, 2024. 

For the Court, 

B- 1 > /44

Chief Justice 

08/08/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0418
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Steven
Malone, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Findex.com, Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant’s
      other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:
 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s
      disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
      the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation
      Date”);
      and
 
 c)
    presented
      in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date;
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s
      other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation, to the registrant’s
      auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      function):
 
 a)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant’s
      ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
      identified for the registrant’s
      auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
      internal controls; and
 
 6.
    The
      registrant’s
      other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
      whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
      other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
      to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
      actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date:
      April 15, 2005
    By
    /s/
      Steven MaloneSteven
      MalonePresident
      & Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 165 (Friday, August 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10823]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 165 / Friday, August 23, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 43574]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 531

RIN 3206-AG88


Pay Under the General Schedule; Locality Pay Areas for 1997

Correction

    In the correction to rule document 96-20092 published on page 42939 
in the issue of Monday, August 19, 1996 make the following correction:


Sec. 531.603  [Corrected]

    In the third column, the heading ``Sec. 561.603 [Corrected]'' 
should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Pesticides and the decline of Guam's native birds      

      January 1, 1985    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
Jeffrey S. KAUFMAN, Jr., et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. EDGEFIELD HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MILTON ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2248

[December 8, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-2048CF10A.

Milton Allen, Jasper, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert Thele certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CoConnect, Inc. (formerly Advanced Wireless Communications, Inc.).



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Robert Thele

Robert Thele, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



May 19, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 76 (Thursday, April 18, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 16975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30418]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 94N-0033]


John D. Copanos; Denial of Hearing; Final Debarment Order

Correction

    In notice document 96-5687 beginning on page 9711 in the issue of 
Monday, March 11, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 9713, in the first column, in the fifth line, ``(insert 
date of publication in the Federal Register)'' should read ``March 11, 
1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Frank RODE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 144 (Thursday, July 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38578-38579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10727]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA--00422]


General Electric Co., Rome, Georgia; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reopening

    On July 5, 1995, the Department, at the request of the petitioners, 
reopened its investigation for workers producing medium transformers at 
the subject facility. The initial investigation resulted in a negative 
determination. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 
25, 1995 (60 FR 27794).
    The Department had issued a negative determination in the subject 
case because criteria (3) and (4) of the group eligibility requirements 
in paragraph (a)(1) of Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, were not met. Imports of medium transformers from Mexico or 
Canada did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the 
General Electric Company, Rome, Georgia facility, and there was no 
shift in production to Mexico or Canada.
    The petitioners had alleged a shift in production by the subject 
firm to Mexico. An intent to outsource some production had been 
announced, but a final decision had not yet been made. New findings on 
reopening show that on June 12, 1995, General Electric Company ratified 
an agreement to shift some production of transformers to Mexico.
    Other findings show that sales, production and employment decreased 


[[Page 38579]]
during the relevant time periods of the investigation.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, 
it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with medium transformers produced by the subject firm 
contributed importantly to the decline in production and to the total 
or partial separation of workers at the subject firm. In accordance 
with the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following 
revised determination:
    ``All workers of General Electric Company, Rome, Georgia who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 30, 
1994 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA Section 250 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 13th day of July 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Mud fossils      

      January 1, 1997    

At the close of the 18th century, the haze of fantasy and mysticism that tended to obscure the true nature of the Earth was being swept away. Careful studies by scientists showed that rocks had diverse origins. Some rock layers, containing clearly identifiable fossil remains of fish and other forms of aquatic animal and plant life, originally formed in the ocean. Other layers, consisting of sand grains winnowed clean by the pounding surf, obviously formed as beach deposits that marked the shorelines of ancient seas.

## Citation Information