alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Desert Health Products, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
       Company.

By:   /s/ Johnny Shannon
    --------------------
Johnny Shannon                             Date:  November 14, 2005
Chief Executive Officer




Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 26, 2020

a0518 

# Order

Clerk May 26, 2020

158988

- 9(82)

DKE, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158988

- 9

COA: 333497; 337834

Oakland CC: 2005

- 068745

- CK

SECURA INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of thi s Court’s January 31,

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow

Miller, P.C.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

16218

Vol. 62, No. 65

Friday, April 4, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service

7 CFR Parts 300 and 319

[Docket No. 96–046–1]

Importation of Fruits and Vegetables

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–7455,

beginning on page 14037, in the issue of

Tuesday, March 25, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 14039, in the first column, in

Garlic From Romania, in the first

paragraph, in the third garlic treatment,

in the first line, ‘‘40 g/m3 (2 lbs/1000

ft3)’’ should read ‘‘40 g/m3 (2 1/2 lbs/

1000 ft3)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. 96–36]

Yu–To Hsu, M.D., Denial of Application

Correction

In notice document 97–6793,

beginning on page 12840 in the issue of

Tuesday, March 18, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 12840, in the third

column, in the second full paragraph, in

the first line, ‘According’’’ should read

‘‘Accordingly’’.

2. On page 12841, in the first column,

in the second full paragraph, in the

tenth line, ‘‘38’’ should read ‘‘28’’.

3. On page 12841, in the second

column, in the second full paragraph, in

the tenth line, ‘‘fiend’’ should read

‘‘friend’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. 95–36]

Donald P. Tecca, M.D. Continuation of

Registration With Restrictions

Correction

In notice document 97–6795,

beginning on page 12842 in the issue of

Tuesday, March 18, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 12846, in the second column,

in the 13th line from the bottom,

‘‘47,063’’ should read ‘‘46,063’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 591

RIN 3206–AH07

Cost-of-Living Allowances (Nonforeign

Areas)

Correction

In rule document 97–7380, beginning

on page 14188, in the issue of Tuesday,

March 25, 1997, make the following

correction:

On page 14188, in the second column,

in the Implementation of rate changes

paragraph, in the fifth line, ‘‘[Insert date

of publication in the Federal Register]’’

should read ‘‘March 25, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Alliance HealthCard, Inc., certifies that the
Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alliance HealthCard, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert D. Garces   
|Robert D. Garces       
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|Date: December 22, 2004



67
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of l'lorida

Case No

Chapter

6.q-BA€- F6A

LIST OF EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS

Following is the list of the Debtor's equity security holders which is prepared in accordance with rule 1007(aX3.t for filing in this Chapter 1 1 Case

11

Name and last known address or place of Security Class Number of Securities

business of holder

Kind of Interest

Giselle Hernandez

2646 Sherman St.

Hollywood, FL 33020

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERIURY ON BEHALF OF CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP

I, the President of the corporation named as the debtor in this case, declare under penalty of perjury that I have

read the tbregoing List of Equity Security Holders and ttrat it is true and correct to the best of my information and belief.

Date March 12, 2020 signarure,"r,SSEH$ HeBlltll OUI 'qlstrtLE r{€rtNlvc@

PenuLa* for making d.fdlse stateme ,tt o.f concealtugrp;:r:A 

uf,i;r"*X 

to $5O0,000 or imprisonment ftr up to 5 yers or both.

Sheet 1 of I in List of Ecluity Security Holders

Sottware Copyright {c) '1996-2019 Best Case, LLC - lM.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-13363-PGH Doc 4 Filed 03/12/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Surface processes recorded by rocks and soils on Meridiani Planum, Mars: Microscopic Imager observations during Opportunity's first three extended missions      

      December 1, 2008    

The Microscopic Imager (MI) on the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity has returned images of Mars with higher resolution than any previous camera system, allowing detailed petrographic and sedimentological studies of the rocks and soils at the Meridiani Planum landing site. Designed to simulate a geologist's hand lens, the MI is mounted on Opportunity's instrument arm and can resolve objects 0.1 mm across or larger. This paper provides an overview of MI operations, data calibration, and analysis of MI data returned during the first 900 sols (Mars days) of the Opportunity landed mission. Analyses of Opportunity MI data have helped to resolve major questions about the origin of observed textures and features. These studies support eolian sediment transport, rather than impact surge processes, as the dominant depositional mechanism for Burns formation strata. MI stereo observations of a rock outcrop near the rim of Erebus Crater support the previous interpretation of similar sedimentary structures in Eagle Crater as being formed by surficial flow of liquid water. Well‐sorted spherules dominate ripple surfaces on the Meridiani plains, and the size of spherules between ripples decreases by about 1 mm from north to south along Opportunity's traverse between Endurance and Erebus craters.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Trent Hare

##### Cartography

Astrogeology Science Center

thare@usgs.gov

#### Laszlo Kestay, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

laz@usgs.gov

928-556-7002

#### Randolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Astrogeology Science Center

rkirk@usgs.gov

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Trent Hare

##### Cartography

Astrogeology Science Center

thare@usgs.gov

#### Laszlo Kestay, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

laz@usgs.gov

928-556-7002

#### Randolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Astrogeology Science Center

rkirk@usgs.gov

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
MERK FUNDS, LLC, Appellant, v. Margarita TORRES, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1070

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

Behren Law Firm and Scott M. Behren (Weston), for appellant.

Fuerst Ittleman David & Joseph, Christopher M. David and Jeffrey J. Molinaro, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            117,549
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      68,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        12,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  197,889
<PP&E>                                            201,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                     16,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    638,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              46,713
<BONDS>                                           150,043
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           43,031
<OTHER-SE>                                        398,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      638,482
<SALES>                                            74,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   74,194
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     847,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (847,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (847,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (773,015)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.01)



</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0028. SEAN CROSSWHITE v. KRISTI YAKE.

The parties were divorced in 2014. In 2023, Sean Crosswhite filed a petition

to modify custody, parenting time, and child support, and a petition for contempt.

Following a hearing, the court dismissed the petition to modify custody, parenting

time, and child support, denied the petition for contempt, and awarded Kristi Yake

attorney’s fees.Crosswhite then timely filed this application for discretionary review.

1

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), direct appeals are permitted from “[a]ll

judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying

child custody or holding or declining to hold persons in contempt of such child

custody judgment or orders.” Thus, when the appeal arises from a child custody

modification case, and the appellant raises child custody issues, the order is directly

appealable. See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 46-47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017); Pappas v.

Stewart, 369 Ga. App. 40, 41 (1) (892 SE2d 59) (2023). Because Crosswhite seeks to

challenge the trial court’s child custody and contempt ruling, the order here may be

appealed directly. See id. Moreover, because Crosswhite’s direct appeal of the

modification order is proper, he may raise on appeal “all judgments, rulings, or orders

rendered in the case . . . which may affect the proceedings below[,]” even if those

orders are not otherwise subject to direct appeal. OCGA§ 5-6-34 (d). See also Murphy

v. Murphy, 328 Ga. App. 767, 768 (1) (b) (759 SE2d 909) (2014).

1 We granted an extension of time, allowing Crosswhite until August 12, 2024,

to file his application. See Case No. A24E0081 (July 10, 2024).

August 27, 2024
We will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is

subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is

hereby GRANTED. Crosswhite shall have ten days from the date of this order to file

a notice of appeal with the trial court. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to

include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/27/2024
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6151 RONALD JERRY SAWYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. ALEXANDER; T. GOODRICH; D. LIPSCONE; R. WALKER, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-6432 RONALD JERRY SAWYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. ALEXANDER; T. GOODRICH; D. LIPSCONE; R. WALKER, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-1105-CV-2, CA-95-1103-CV-2)2 Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. No. 96-6151 affirmed and No. 96-6432 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In No. 96-6151, Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We find that the denial of leave to appeal was not an abuse of discretion. Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , 393 U.S. 891 (1965). Accordingly, we affirm. In No. 96-6432, Appellant appeals from the district court's order declining to rule on the motions he filed after filing his appeal in No. 96-6151. This court may exercise jurisdiction onlyover final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-6151 - AFFIRMED No. 96-6432 - DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Thermal measurements of dark and bright surface features on Vesta as derived from Dawn/VIR      

      January 1, 2014    

Remote sensing data acquired during Dawn’s orbital mission at Vesta showed several local concentrations of high-albedo (bright) and low-albedo (dark) material units, in addition to spectrally distinct meteorite impact ejecta. The thermal behavior of such areas seen at local scale (1-10 km) is related to physical properties that can provide information about the origin of those materials. We use Dawn’s Visible and InfraRed (VIR) mapping spectrometer hyperspectral data to retrieve surface temperatures and emissivities, with high accuracy as long as temperatures are greater than 220 K. Some of the dark and bright features were observed multiple times by VIR in the various mission phases at variable spatial resolution, illumination and observation angles, local solar time, and heliocentric distance. This work presents the first temperature maps and spectral emissivities of several kilometer-scale dark and bright material units on Vesta. Results retrieved from the infrared data acquired by VIR show that bright regions generally correspond to regions with lower temperature, while dark regions correspond to areas with higher temperature. During maximum daily insolation and in the range of heliocentric distances explored by Dawn, i.e. 2.23-2.54 AU, the warmest dark unit found on Vesta rises to a temperature of 273 K, while bright units observed under comparable conditions do not exceed 266 K. Similarly, dark units appear to have higher emissivity on average compared to bright units. Dark-material units show a weak anticorrelation between temperature and albedo, whereas the relation is stronger for bright material units observed under the same conditions. Individual features may show either evanescent or distinct margins in the thermal images, as a consequence of the cohesion of the surface material. Finally, for the two categories of dark and bright materials, we were able to highlight the influence of heliocentric distance on surface temperatures, and estimate an average temperature rate change of 1% following a variation of 0.04 AU in the solar distance.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Remanent magnetization and magnetic susceptibility of two-oriented cores, Cement oil field, Oklahoma; a reference data set      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,710                       4
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           682                     682
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,392)                   (686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      617                     462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (617)                   (462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (617)                   (462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (617)                   (462)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)                  (.001)



</TABLE>