alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4884 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4884

   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to place an annual cap on 
     support provided through the Lifeline program of the Federal 
Communications Commission and to provide for certain other requirements 
                       relating to such program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2016

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to place an annual cap on 
     support provided through the Lifeline program of the Federal 
Communications Commission and to provide for certain other requirements 
                       relating to such program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Controlling the Unchecked and 
Reckless Ballooning of Lifeline Act of 2016'' or the ``CURB Lifeline 
Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE LIFELINE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Part II of title II of the Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 251 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 254 
the following:

``SEC. 254A. CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE LIFELINE PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Annual Cap on Support.--The total amount of support that may 
be provided through the Lifeline program of the Commission in any 
calendar year may not exceed $1,500,000,000.
    ``(b) Prohibition on Subsidy of Devices.--Support provided through 
the Lifeline program of the Commission may not be applied to any amount 
charged to a consumer for the sale, lease, or other provision of a 
mobile telephone or similar device.
    ``(c) Prohibition on Voice-Only Mobile Service.--Support provided 
through the Lifeline program of the Commission may not be applied to 
mobile service if the service offering is limited to voice 
communications service.''.
    (b) Effective Dates.--Section 254A of the Communications Act of 
1934, as added by subsection (a), shall apply as follows:
            (1) Subsection (a) of such section shall apply beginning 
        with calendar year 2017.
            (2) Subsection (b) of such section shall apply beginning on 
        the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (3) Subsection (c) of such section shall apply beginning on 
        the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

TERRY ALDAVA, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0290 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2007-172915-001

The Honorable Sally Schneider Duncan, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Lisa Marie Martin

Counsel for Respondent

Terry Aldava, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge Jon W. Thompson, and Judge 

Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 1-4-2018
STATE v. ALDAVA

Decision of the Court

2

P E R C U R I A M:

¶1 Petitioner Terry Aldava seeks review of the superior court’s 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to 

Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s third 

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 576-77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the 

petition. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not shown any abuse of discretion. 

¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Tectono-magmatic processes investigated at deep-water flanks of Hawaiian volcanoes      

      October 10, 2000    

Hawaiian volcanoes are exceptional examples of intraplate hotspot volcanism. Hotspot volcanoes, which frequently host large eruptions and related earthquakes, flank‐failure landslides, and associated tsunamis, can present severe hazards to populated regions. Many studies have focused on subaerial parts of Hawaiian volcanoes, but the deep‐water flanks of the edifices, which can reach 5700 m below sea level, remain poorly understood because they are so inaccessible. In 1998 a collaborative program between Japan and the United States was initiated to explore the evolution of Hawaiian volcanoes, including their growth and degradation

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter W Lipman, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

plipman@usgs.gov

650-269-5295

####             Aaron J Pietruszka (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

#### Thomas Winslow Sisson, PhD

##### Research Geologist

California Volcano Observatory

tsisson@usgs.gov

650-329-5247

#### Frank Trusdell

##### Research Geologist

Hawaiian Volcano Observatory

trusdell@usgs.gov

808-967-8812

## Related Content

#### Peter W Lipman, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

plipman@usgs.gov

650-269-5295

####             Aaron J Pietruszka (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

#### Thomas Winslow Sisson, PhD

##### Research Geologist

California Volcano Observatory

tsisson@usgs.gov

650-329-5247

#### Frank Trusdell

##### Research Geologist

Hawaiian Volcano Observatory

trusdell@usgs.gov

808-967-8812

### Study Area

### Contacts

####             Aaron J Pietruszka (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - hawaii

View All **
Tito YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION

IN RE: 

ROSA M GONZALEZ AKA ROSA 

GONZALEZ AKA ROSA MARGARITA 

GONZALEZ AKA ROSA MARGARITA 

GONZALEZ VIGOA AKA ROSA 

GONZALEZ VIGOA AKA ROSA M 

GONZALEZ VIGOA and SONIA C SOLA 

AKA SONIA SOLA AKA SONIA CARIDAD 

SOLA AKA SONIA DE LA CARIDAD SOLA,

Debtors.

______________________________________/ 

Case No.20-17181-LMI

Chapter 13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Order Granting Motion 

Confirming the Automatic Stay is Not In Effect as to Debtor [D.E. #82] for the Motion for Order 

Confirming that the Automatic is Not In Effect [D.E. #75] filed by Bank of America, N.A. was 

served via U.S. Mail, first-class postage prepaid, on June 13, 2022, upon: 

DEBTORS

Rosa M Gonzalez

Sonia C Sola

1790 W 60th Street #5

Hialeah, FL 33012-6848

The following CM/ECF users were served electronically on June 13, 2022.

DEBTORS ATTORNEY

(via electronic notice)

Jose A. Blanco, Esq

jose@blancopa.com

Case 20-17181-LMI Doc 83 Filed 06/14/22 Page 1 of 2
TRUSTEE

(via electronic notice)

Nancy K. Neidich

e2c8f01@ch13miami.com

UNITED STATES TRUSTEE

(via electronic notice)

Department of Justice

Southern District of Florida - Miami

Office of the US Trustee

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Jennifer Laufgas

Jennifer Laufgas

Bar No.: 56181

Aldridge Pite, LLP

Attorney for Movant

Fifteen Piedmont Center 

3575 Piedmont Road, N.E., Suite 500 

Atlanta, GA 30305

Phone: (404) 994-7400

Fax: (619) 590-1385

Email: jlaufgas@aldridgepite.com

Case 20-17181-LMI Doc 83 Filed 06/14/22 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: _____________________________ Case No.: ________________

_____________________________ Chapter 13

Debtor(s).

/

DEBTOR CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST

FOR CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN

As required under Local Rule 3015-3(B)(2), the debtor in the above captioned matter certifies

as follows:

1. Payment of all postpetition domestic support obligations (check which paragraph applies).

_____ A. Since the filing of this bankruptcy, the debtor has not been required by a judicial or 

administrative order, or by statute to pay any domestic support obligation as defined in 11

U.S.C. §101(14A); or

_____ B. The debtor has paid, either directly or to the chapter 13 trustee under the last 

filed plan, all amounts that are required to be paid under a domestic support obligation and

that first became payable after the date of the filing of the petition if the debtor is required

by a judicial or administrative order, or by statute, to pay such domestic support obligation.

2. The debtor has filed all federal, state and local tax returns required by law to be filed

under 11 U.S.C. §1308 for all taxable periods ending during the four year period ending on

the date of the filing of the petition commencing this bankruptcy case.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this Certificate is true and

correct.

Debtor’s Signature

Dated:

Joint Debtor’s Signature (if applicable)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 230F21EA-7AAC-4FA2-A6C4-609C03107E4D

RON VIGDOR

3/24/2020

X

20-12751-MAM

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 11 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 1
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4951 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to allow the importation 

of certain foreign-manufactured firearms components. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2016 

Mr. RUSSELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

allow the importation of certain foreign-manufactured 

firearms components. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPORTED BARRELS, MUZZLE ATTACHMENTS, 

4 TRIGGER GROUPS, AND TRIGGERS ALLOWED 

5 TO BE USED IN ASSEMBLING A LONG GUN OR 

6 A SHOTGUN IDENTICAL TO THOSE MANUFAC7 TURED AND ALLOWED UNDER THE SPORTING 

8 PURPOSES TEST. 

9 Section 922(r) of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended by adding after and below the end the following: 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4951 IH

1 ‘‘A barrel, a muzzle attachment, a trigger group, and a 

2 trigger shall not be considered an imported part for pur3 poses of this subsection.’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BARREL AND RECEIVER IMPORTATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 925(e) of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, and’’ and 

8 inserting a period; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(3) All frames or receivers of rifles, or barrels 

11 for firearms other than handguns, if the importation 

12 is for repair or replacement purposes.’’. 

13 (b) GOVERNMENTAL IMPORTS.—Section 925(a)(1) of 

14 such title is amended by inserting ‘‘, barrel,’’ after ‘‘or 

15 importation of any firearm’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40135

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL CASILLAS-LLAMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-98-CR-333-01

- - - - - - - - - -

August 26, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Manuel Casillas-Llamas argues that the district court

did not address his request for an additional downward departure

based on cultural assimilation and that this inaction constitutes

a violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 32.

The Rule 32 violation is harmless because this court may not

review the denial of an additional downward departure when there

is no evidence that the district court refused to depart downward

under the mistaken belief that it could not legally do so. See
No. 99-40135

-2-

Peguero v. United States, 119 S. Ct. 961, 965 (1999); United

States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1999);

United States v. Aggarwal, 17 F.3d 737, 745 (5th Cir. 1994). The

district court’s silence on the motion for a downward departure

based on cultural assimilation is construed as an implicit

denial. See Aggarwal, 17 F.3d at 745. Therefore, Casillas’

sentence is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal and cites

United States v. Reyes-Nava, 169 F.3d 278, 280 (5th Cir. 1999). 

However, Reyes-Nava is not applicable to this case, and the issue

was not wholly frivolous. Therefore, the motion to dimiss the

appeal is DENIED.

AFFIRMED. MOTION TO DISMISS is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 195 (Monday, October 7, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 52498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-81007]



[[Page 52498]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

17 CFR Part 420

RIN: 1505-AA53


Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Markets; 
Government Securities Act Regulations: Large Position Rules

Correction

    In rule document 96-23331 beginning on page 48338 in the issue of 
Thursday, September 12, 1996 make the following corrections:


Sec. 420.4  [Corrected]

    1. On page 48350, in Sec. 420.4(a)(3), in the first column, in the 
penultimate line ``January 21, 1997'' should read ``January 10, 1997''.


Sec. 420.5  [Corrected]

    2. On the same page, in the third column, in Sec. 420.5, in the 
last line ``March 31, 1997'' should read ``March 11, 1997''.


Appendix B to Part 420  [Corrected]

    3. On page 48351, in Appendix B to Part 420, in the table, in entry 
1 the blank line on the right should be preceded by ``$''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JONATHAN JEROME HILLS, AKA 

Jerome Johnathan Hill, AKA Jerome 

Johnson Hill, AKA Janathan J. Hills, AKA 

Jerome Hills, AKA Jerome J. Hills, AKA 

Jerome Johnathan Hills, AKA Jerome 

Jonathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonthan Hills, 

AKA Johanathon Jerome Hills, AKA 

Johnatham J. Hills, AKA Johnathan Jerome 

Hills, AKA Johnathon Jerome Hills, AKA 

Jonatham Jerome Hills, AKA Jonathan Hills, 

AKA Jonathon Jerome Hills, AKA Jonthan 

Jerome Hills, AKA Romeo Hills, AKA 

Robert Ricks, AKA Rome, AKA Romeo, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-50327 

D.C. No. 2:05-cr-01040-JFW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-50327 

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Jonathan Jerome Hills appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Hills contends that the district court erred by relying on its evaluation of the 

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors from the original sentencing hearing. We disagree. 

Though the court referenced its § 3553(a) analysis from that earlier hearing, the 

record reflects that the court considered and applied the factors anew to reasonably 

conclude that release was unwarranted in light of Hills’s significant criminal 

history and the Bureau of Prisons’s ability to manage Hills’s health conditions. 

Moreover, contrary to Hills’s contentions, the record reflects that the district court 

considered Hills’s arguments, including those regarding post-sentencing

rehabilitation, and adequately explained its decision to deny his motion. See 

Chavez-Meza v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1965 (2018). The court did not 

abuse its discretion. See United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021).

Appellee’s motion to supplement the record is denied. 

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The roles of large top predators in coastal ecosystems: new insights from long term ecological research      

      September 1, 2013    

During recent human history, human activities such as overhunting and habitat destruction have severely impacted many large top predator populations around the world. Studies from a variety of ecosystems show that loss or diminishment of top predator populations can have serious consequences for population and community dynamics and ecosystem stability. However, there are relatively few studies of the roles of large top predators in coastal ecosystems, so that we do not yet completely understand what could happen to coastal areas if large top predators are extirpated or significantly reduced in number. This lack of knowledge is surprising given that coastal areas around the globe are highly valued and densely populated by humans, and thus coastal large top predator populations frequently come into conflict with coastal human populations. This paper reviews what is known about the ecological roles of large top predators in coastal systems and presents a synthesis of recent work from three coastal eastern US Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites where long-term studies reveal what appear to be common themes relating to the roles of large top predators in coastal systems. We discuss three specific themes: (1) large top predators acting as mobile links between disparate habitats, (2) large top predators potentially affecting nutrient and biogeochemical dynamics through localized behaviors, and (3) individual specialization of large top predator behaviors. We also discuss how research within the LTER network has led to enhanced understanding of the ecological roles of coastal large top predators. Highlighting this work is intended to encourage further investigation of the roles of large top predators across diverse coastal aquatic habitats and to better inform researchers and ecosystem managers about the importance of large top predators for coastal ecosystem health and stability.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Martha Mather, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mather@usgs.gov

413-329-2105

## Related Content

#### Martha Mather, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mather@usgs.gov

413-329-2105

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Florida Coastal Everglades;Georgia Coastal Ecosystems;Plum Island Ecosystems
                  - Florida;Georgia;Massachusetts
                  - Florida
                  - Georgia
                  - massachusetts
                  - Florida Coastal Everglades
                  - Georgia Coastal Ecosystems
                  - Plum Island Ecosystems

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 67 (Friday, April 5, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10405]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 67 / Friday, April 5, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 15338]]


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Outer Continental Shelf, Central Gulf of Mexico, Oil and Gas 
Lease Sale 157 - Final

Correction

    In notice document 96-7132 beginning on page 12087 in the issue of 
Monday, March 25, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 12093, in the 2nd column, under the heading West 
Cameron, in the 4th line, delete comma between ``68 and (S1/2)''.
    2. On page 12094, in the 1st column, in the 2nd line from the top, 
insert ``251,''after ``250,''.
    3. On page 12094, in the 1st column, under the heading South Marsh 
Island, in the 4th line, insert ``59,'' between ``58,'' and ``60,''.
    4. On page 12094, in the 1st column, under the heading Ship Shoal, 
in the 15th line, insert ``199,'' between ``198,'' and ``201,''.
    5. On page 12094, in the 2nd column, under the heading South 
Timbalier, in the 5th line, insert ``92,'' between ``91,'' and ``95,''.
    6. On page 12094, in the 3rd column, under the heading Mobile, in 
the first line, insert ``821'' between ``820,'' and ``822,''; in the 
4th line, delete comma between ``911 and (N1/2)''.
    7. On page 12095, in the 1st column, under the heading Mississippi 
Canyon, in the 21st line, insert ``517,'' between ``516, and ``517,''.
    8. On page 12095, in the same column, under the heading Green 
Canyon, in the ninth line, delete the second ``192'' and insert 
``193''.
    9. On page 12095, in the 3rd column, under the heading Atwater 
Valley, in the 4th line, insert ``99,'' between ``98,'' and ``100,''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Travis L. KENYON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 9, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 30314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30608]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3046406-JAN-201208:16 AM