alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Dr. Philip Nolan, as Chief Executive Officer ofeircomGroup plc (registrant), and eircomFunding, Valentia Telecommunications andeircomLimited (additional registrants) hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 March 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("the Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant and the additional
registrants.

|Date:                                            |  | 30 June 2005 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------ |  | 
|                                                 |  |              |  | 
|By:                                              |  | GRAPHIC      |  | 
|Dr. Philip Nolan
Chief Executive eircomGroup plc |  |             

A
signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toeircomGroup plc and will
be retained byeircomGroup plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Jenelle WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3021

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
2011 Cash Bonus Awards



 Exhibit 10.1 
 2011 Cash Bonus Awards 
  

	
	


					
	 Executive Officer
	  	2011 Cash
Bonus*	 
	 Douglas C. Bryant

President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	327,016	  
	 Robert J. Bujarski

Senior Vice President, Business Development and General Counsel
	  	$	105,651	  
	 John M. Radak

Former Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	104,963	  
	 Randall J. Steward

Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	—  	  
	 Timothy Stenzel, M.D./Ph.D.

Chief Scientific Officer
	  	$	101,564	  
	 John D. Tamerius, Ph.D.

Senior Vice President, Clinical/Regulatory
	  	$	95,561	  

  

	*	To the extent the executive officer elected to participate in the Company’s 2011 Employee Deferred Bonus Compensation Program (the “Program”), the
participating executive officer may have received 50% or 100% of the cash value of his or her bonus plus an additional premium on such deferred amount in the form or restricted stock units per the terms and conditions of the Program.
eau8k312ex103.htm


EXHIBIT 10.3


 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT



TO


THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED


SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE







This First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note (“Second Amendment”) is made and entered into this ___ day of December, 2011 by EAU Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Water Science, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Holder”).







BACKGROUND







WHEREAS, Company and Holder executed and delivered that certain Third Amended and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note, dated October 21, 2010, in the original principal amount of $3 million (the “Original Note”);







WHEREAS, Company and Holder executed and delivered that certain First Amendment to the Original Note, dated March 10, 2009 (the “First Amendment”); and







WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to execute and deliver this First Amendment to Third Amendment to the Original Note.







NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Holder do hereby agree as follows:







1.           Section 3(a) of the Original Note, as amended by the Third Amendment, is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is hereby inserted in its place:







Maturity Date.  The Company shall pay the principal amount outstanding hereunder together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon and any other amounts payable to Holder in respect of this Note on the earlier of (i) November 30, 2013, or (ii) the acceleration of the maturity of this Note by Holder pursuant to Section (6)(b)(i), (the earlier of such dates, the “Maturity Date”), unless otherwise converted into Common Stock in accordance with Section 7.







2.           Except as expressly set forth herein, the Original Note, as amended by the First Amendment, Second Amendment and Third Amendment, shall remain unchanged and unmodified and in full force and effect.







3.           All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Third Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Original Note, as amended by the First Amendment and Second Amendment.


 


4.           This Third Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto were in the same instrument.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.  Signatures on following page.]


 






  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Third Amendment under seal on the date first above written.


 



 




	 	Company:	 
	 	EAU TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Wade Bradley	 
	 	 	Wade Bradley	 
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 









 


 




 




	 	Holder:	 
	 	WATER SCIENCE, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Peter Ullrich	 
	 	 	Peter Ullrich	 
	 	 	Manager
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 2 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 3 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 4 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 5 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 6 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 7 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 8 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 9 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 10 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 11 of 12
Case 20-14989-PGH Doc 17 Filed 06/23/20 Page 12 of 12
William J. MCCUTCHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1204

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         144,479                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,788                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,530                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,675                       0
<PP&E>                                          20,946                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,403                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,395                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,860                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            13                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,868                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,395                       0
<SALES>                                        207,616                 107,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,616                 107,932
<CGS>                                          198,743                 108,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,743                 108,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,107                  19,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,388)                   (114)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,846)                (19,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,846)                (19,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,846)                (19,252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)                  (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)                  (0.22)


</TABLE>
D.D., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1453

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Luis Eduardo MARTINEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3590

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-10228]



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 1997 / 
Corrections

[[Page 9239]]



PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION


Request for Comment on Proposed Collection of Information Under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act; Locating and Paying Participants

Correction

    In notice document 97-4344 appearing on page 8057 in the issue of 
Friday, February 21, 1997, make the following correction:
     On page 8057, in the second column, in the first paragraph, in the 
last line, ``36,610'' should read ``31,610''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Barbara JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
A.G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Regional tectonic setting for the Trinidad earthquake swarms (2000-2012) from gravity and magnetic data      

      December 31, 2015    

Earthquakes in the Raton basin near Trinidad, Colorado, (Figure 1) are located (Rubenstein et. al., 2014) near a major gravity and magnetic boundary. These earthquakes also occur in an area of hydrocarbon production that includes several high-capacity produced water injection wells. This presentation gives a very basic outline of the relation between the earthquakes, the potential field data, and possible basement structure.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Carol A Finn, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

cfinn@usgs.gov

303-236-1345

####             Bruce D Smith (Former Employee)          

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

## Related Content

#### Carol A Finn, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

cfinn@usgs.gov

303-236-1345

####             Bruce D Smith (Former Employee)          

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Raton Basin
                  - Colorado
                  -  New Mexico

View All **
Exhibit 32      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL
          OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of United EcoEnergy Corp.
(the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities & Exchange Commission, I, Robert Hipple, Interim Chief
Executive and Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Hipple
--------------------------------------
Robert Hipple
Interim Chief Executive and Financial Officer
August 14, 2008
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of LaBranche & Co Inc., hereby certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaBranche & Co Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 15, 2004

| |  |  | /s/GEORGE M.L. LABRANCHE, IVName:  George M.L. LaBranche, IV
Title:    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
             and President
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 20250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Lawrence FLOYD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LA/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HOSSEIN KAFSHDAR GOHARIAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71189

Agency No. A075-749-651

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Hossein Kafshdar Goharian, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his second motion to

reopen proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

FEB 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LA/Research 2 07-71189

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321

F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Goharian’s motion to reopen

as untimely because it was filed more than three years after the BIA’s final order,

see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Goharian failed to establish that he exercised due

diligence to warrant tolling of the filing deadline, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897

(equitable tolling is available to a petitioner who establishes deception, fraud, or

error in timely filing, and who exercised due diligence in discovering such

circumstances); see also Singh v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1095-97 (9th Cir.

2007).

We lack jurisdiction over the BIA’s April 2007 order because this petition is

not timely as to that order. See Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1181, 1183 n.3 (9th

Cir. 2004) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum  SuperYachts,  Inc.
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ron
Ruskowsky,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Ron Ruskowsky
Ron Ruskowsky,
President, CEO and Principal Executive and Accounting Officer


November 9, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary gravity inversion model of Frenchman Flat Basin, Nevada Test Site, Nevada      

      November 1, 2002    

View Document

View Plate 1

The depth of the basin beneath Frenchman Flat is estimated using a gravity inversion method. Gamma-gamma density logs from two wells in Frenchman Flat constrained the density profiles used to create the gravity inversion model. Three initial models were considered using data from one well, then a final model is proposed based on new information from the second well. The preferred model indicates that a northeast-trending oval-shaped basin underlies Frenchman Flat at least 2,100 m deep, with a maximum depth of 2,400 m at its northeast end. No major horst and graben structures are predicted. Sensitivity analysis of the model indicates that each parameter contributes the same magnitude change to the model, up to 30 meters change in depth for a 1% change in density, but some parameters affect a broader area of the basin. The horizontal resolution of the model was determined by examining the spacing between data stations, and was set to 500 square meters.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - nevada

View All **
July 24, 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Extension of exemption from 14 CFR, Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic (AMG) 

written tests to be administered after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum. 

Exemption No. 10640. Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0915

Dear Sir or Madam,

Technical Educational Services Inc., d/b/a Aviation Institute of Maintenance (AIM) operates an FAA Approved Aviation 

Maintenance Technician School (AMTS), in Oakland, California, under Air Agency Certificate 2AQT602K.

PETITION:

AIM is requesting an extension of the exemption from 14 CFR, Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic General 

written test (AMG) to be administered after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum.

Relief Sought: AIM is seeking an extension to the exemption from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow students enrolled in its Part 

147 Aviation Maintenance Technician School to take the Aviation Mechanic General written test (AMG) after completing the 

corresponding portion of the curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of §65.77.

Person(s) to be covered by the exemption: AIM, Air Agency 2AQT602K and students enrolled in its AMTS program in the 

Airframe, Powerplant, or Airframe and Powerplant curricula.

Information, views, or arguments to support the action sought: There has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension of the 

exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute of 

Maintenance and the students served by it.

Sincerely,

David L. Jones

Corporate Aviation Education Director

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard

Virginia Beach, VA 23452
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF KELLY

GARNER K ILROY TO THE BAR OF

MARYLAND *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

AG No. 20

September Term, 202 3

ORDER

Upon consideration of the p etition for r einstatement and Bar Counsel ’s response

, it

is this 19th day of January 2024

, by the Supreme Court of Maryland

,

ORDERED that the p etition is granted ; and it is further

ORDERED that Kelly Garner K ilroy is reinstated as a member of the Bar of

Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Kelly Garner K ilroy

upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to

the Trustee s of the Client Protection Fund and the c lerks of all judicial tribunals in this

State.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice