# OAR Box 1415 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 32 ) F

. R

. Augus t 2 , 200 1 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/15/2008 9:38:27AM

Sheet 32 of 130 P. 1P. 3



# p

r

WHipr 

# X_ , Thursday , Augus t2 , 200 1



# Par tH 

# Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 4 0 CF RPar t6 3 Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai rPollutants : Reinforce d Plasti cComposite s Production ; Propose d Rul e

A" " >P. 2


### 4032 4 Federa l Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 4 0 CF R Part 6 3 [FRL-7005-S ] RI N 2060-AE7 9 Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Productio n AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (EPA)
. ACTION:JBroposg drule
. SUMMARY

: Thi s actio npropose s nationa l emissio n standard s fo r hazardou s ai r pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo r ne w an d existin g reinforce dplasti c composite s productio nfacilities
. Th e propose d standard s regulat e productio n an d ancillar y processe s use dt o manufactur e product s wit hthermose t resin s an dge l coats . Reinforce dplasti c composite s - productio nfacilitie s emi t hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAP) , suc ha s styrene , methy l methacrylat e (MMA) , an d methylen e chlorid e (dichloromethane)
. Thes e HA Phav e advers e healt heffect s includin g headache , fatigue , depression , irritatio no f

skin , eyes , an dmucou s membranes
. Methylen e chlorid e ha s bee nclassifie da s aprobabl e huma n carcinogen
. Thes e propose dstandard s wil l implemen t

sectio n112(d ) ofth e Clea nAi r

Ac t (CAA ) b y requirin g al l majo r source s i nthi s categor y t o mee t HA Pemissio nstandard s reflectin g th e applicatio no f

th e maximu machievabl e contro l technolog y (MACT)
. W e estimat e th e propose dNESHA Pwoul d reduc e nationwid e emission s o f HA P fro mthes e facilitie s b y approximatel y 14,50 0 ton s pe r

yea r (tpy ) (6 5 percent)
. DATES : Comments. Submi t comment s o n o r befor e figtoberlr^OOl. Eublic HeanHgTl f

anyon e contact s th e EP A requestin g to spea k a t apubli c hearin g b y Augus t

22 , 2001 , apubli c ' hearin g wil l b e hel do n.Jeptemberjt , 

## aoo t "" " ADDRESSES : Comments. B y U.S
. Posta l Service , sen dcomment s (i nduplicat e i f possible ) to : Ai r

an dRadiatio nDocke t an dInformatio nCente r (6102) , Attentio nDocke t

Numbe r A=9A=5_2,

_ U.S
. EPA , 120 0 Pennsylvani aAvenue , NW. , Washington , D C 20460
. I nperso n o r b y courier , delive r

comment s (i n duplicat e i f

possible ) to : Ai r

an d Radiatio nDocke t

an dInformatio n Cente r (6102) , Attentio nDocke t Numbe r A-94-52 , U.S
. EPA , 40 1 M Street , SW. , Washington , D C 20460
. W e reques t a separat e cop y als o b e sen t t o th e contac t perso nliste dbelo w i n th e FO RFURTHE

R INFORMATIO

N CONTAC

T section . Public Hearing. If

apubli c hearin g i s held , i t wil l b e hel da t

EPA' s Offic e o f Administratio nAuditorium , Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort hCarolina
. Docket. gojgketJSTo , A-94-5 2 contain s supportin g informatio n use dih ° developin g th e standards
. Th e docke t i s . locate da t

th e U.S
. EPA , 40 1 M Street , SW. , Washington , D C 2046 0 i nRoo m M-1500 , Watersid e Mal l (groun dfloor) , an dma y b e inspecte dfro m8:3 0 a.m . t o 5:3 0 p.m. , Monda y throug hFriday , excludin g lega l holidays
. FO RFURTHE RINFORMATIO

N CONTACT

: Keit hBarnett , Organi c Chemical s Group , Emissio nStandard s Divisio n (MD-13) , U.S
. EPA , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a27711,19191541

- 5605fcbarnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov
. Fo r publi c hearin g information , contac t ^ariaNoell , Organi c Chemical s Group , Emissio nStandard s Divisio n (MD-13) , U.S
. EPA , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a27711 , (919)j41-5607
. SUPPLEMENTAR

Y INFORMATION

: Comments. Comment s an ddat ama y b e submitte db y electroni c mai l (e-mail ) to : a-and-r-docket@epa.gov
. Electroni c comment s mus t

b e submitte deithe r

a s a nASCI I fil e t o avoi dth e us e o f specia l character s an dencryptio nproblem s o r o ndisk s i nWordPerfect TM versio n5.1 , 6. 1 o r Core l 8 fil e format
. Al l comment s an ddat asubmitte di n electroni c for m mus t not e th e docke t

number : A-94-52
. N o confidentia l busines s informatio n (CBI ) shoul db e submitte db y e-mail
. Electroni c comment s ma y b e file d onlin e a t man y Federa l Depositor y Libraries
. Commenter s wishin g t o submi t proprietar y informatio nfo r consideratio n mus t

clearl y distinguis h suc hinformatio n fromothe r comment s an dclearl y labe l i t

a s CBI
. Sen d submission s containin g suc h proprietar y informatio n directl y t o th e followin g address , an dno t t o th e publi c docket , t o ensur e tha t

proprietar y informatio ni s no t

inadvertentl y place d i nth e docket : Attention : Keit hBarnett , c/ o OAQP S Documen t

Contro l Office r (Roo m740B) , U.S
. EPA , 41 1 W
. Chape l Hil l Street , Durham , N C 27701
. Th e EP A wil l disclos e informatio nidentifie da s CB I onl y t o th e exten t

allowe db y th e procedure s se t

fort hi n 4 0 CF Rpar t

2
. If n o clai mo f

confidentialit y accompanie s asubmissio nwhe n i t i s receive db y th e EPA , th e informatio n ma y b e mad e availabl e t o th e publi c withou t furthe r notic e t o th e commenter . Public Hearing. Person s intereste di n presentin g ora l testimon y o r inquirin g a s t o whethe r

ahearin g i s t o b e hel d shoul dcontac t

Mari aNoell , Organi c Chemical s Group , Emissio nStandard s Divisio n (MD-13) , U.S
. EPA , Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a27711 , (919 ) 541-560 7 a t

leas t 2 day s i n advanc e of

th e publi c hearing
. Person s intereste di n attendin g th e publi c hearin g mus t

als o cal l Mari aNoel l t o verif y th e time , date , an dlocatio n o f th e hearing
. Th e publi c hearin g wil l provid e intereste dpartie s th e opportunit y t o presen t data , views , o r

argument s concernin g thes e propose demissio n standards
. Docket. Th e docke t

i s a n organize d an dcomplet e fil e o f

th e informatio n considere db y th e EP A i nth e developmen t

o f thi s rulemaking
. Th e docke t i s adynami c fil e becaus e materia l i s adde dthroughou t th e rulemakin g process . Th e docketin g syste mi s intende dt o allo w member s o f th e publi c an dindustrie s involve dt o readil y identify an dlocat e document s s p tha t the y ca n effectivel y participat e i n th e rulemakin g process . Alon g wit h th e propose dan dpromulgate d standard s an dthei r

preambles , th e content s o f

th e docket , excludin g interagenc y revie w materials , wil l serv e a s th e recor di nth e cas e o f judicia l review
. (Se e sectio n307(d)(7)(A ) ofth e CAA. ) Th e regulator y tex t an dothe r material s relate dt o thi s rulemakin g ar e availabl e fo r

revie w i nth e docke t

o r copie s ma y b e maile do nreques t from th e Ai r Docke t b y callin g (202 ) 260

- 7548
. A reasonabl e fe e ma y b e charge d fo r copyin g docke t

materials
. World Wide Web (WWW). I nadditio n t o bein g availabl e i n th e docket , a n electroni c cop y o f

th e propose d NESHA Pwil l als o b e availabl e o n th e WW Wthroug hth e Technolog y Transfe r Networ k (TTN)
. Followin g signature , a cop y o f th e propose dNESHA Pwil l b e poste do n th e TTN' s polic y an d guidanc e pag e fo r

newl y propose do r • promulgate drule s httpT/www.epajjov / ttn/oarpg
. Th e TTN^ro^HSF 35 " 1 informatio n an dtechnolog y exchang e i n variou s area s o f

ai r pollutio ncontrol
. I

f mor e informatio n regardin g th e TT Ni s needed , cal l th e TT N HEL Plin e a t (919 ) 541-5384
. Regulated

Entities. Categorie s an d entitie s potentiall y regulate db y thi s actio ninclude :P. 4


### Federa l Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4032 5 Categor y Industr y

Federa l Governmen t NAIC S •' » cod e 32521 1 32612 2 32599 1 32619 1 32799 1 32799 3 33299 8 3331 2 3365 1 33531 1 33531 3 33531 2 3342 2 33621 1 33611 2 33621 1 3365 1 3365 3 33639 9 3361 2 33621 3 33641 3 33621 4 SIC

.

cod e 282 1 308 4 308 7 308 8 308 9 328 1 329 6 343 1 353 1 353 1 361 2 361 3 362 1 366 3 371 1 371 1 371 3 371 4 371 4 371 6 372 8 374 3 379 2 399 9 Example s of regulate d entitle s Reinforce d plasti ccomposite s productio n facilitie s tha t manufactur e and/o r repai rintermediat e and/o rfina l product s usin g HA P containin g thermose t resin s an d ge l coats
.



### *

Federall yowne d facilitie s tha t manufactur e and/o rrepai rintermediat e and / o rfina l product s usin g HA P containin g thermose t resin s an d ge l coats
.
Thi s tabl e i s no t

intende dt o b e exhaustive , bu t

rathe r provide s aguid e fo r reader s regardin g entitie s likel y t o b e regulate db y thi s action
. T o determin e whethe r you r facilit y i s regulate db y thi s action , yo u shoul dexamin e th e applicabilit y criteri ai n § 63.578 5 ofth e propose drule
. I f

yo u hav e an y question s regardin g th e applicabilit y o f thi s actio n t o aparticula r

entity , consul t

th e perso n liste di nth e precedin g FO RFURTHE

R INFORMATIO

N CONTAC

T section
. Outline. Th e informatio n presente di n thi s preambl e i s organize da s follows : I
. Introductio n A
. Wha t i s th e sourc e o f

authorit y fo r developmen t

o f NESHAP ? B.'Wha t criteri aar e use di nth e developmen t

o f NESHAP ? C
. Wha t ar e th e potentia l healt heffect s o f th e HA Pemitte db y th e reinforce d plasti c composite s productio nindustry ? D
. Ho w wer e th e propose dNESHA P developed ? E
. Wha t processe s an doperation s ar e include di nth e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nsourc e category ? II
. Summar y o f

Propose dNESHA P A
. Wha t sourc e categorie s an d subcategorie s ar e affecte db y thi s propose drule ? B
. Wha t ar e th e primar y source s o f HA P emission s an dwha t

ar e th e emissions ? C
. Wha t i s th e affecte dsource ? D
. Wha t ar e th e propose demissio nlimits , operatin g limits , an dothe r standards ? E
. Wha t i s th e MAC T mode l poin t valu e an dho w i s i t

use di n thes e propose d NESHAP ? F
. Whe nwoul dI nee dt o compl y wit h thes e propose dNESHAP ? G
. Wha t ar e th e propose doption s fo r demonstratin g compliance ? H
. Wha t ar e th e propose dtestin g an d initia l complianc e requirements ? I
. Wha t ar e th e propose dcontinuou s complianc e requirements ? J
. Wha t ar e th e propose dnotification , recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirements ? III
. Rational e fo r

Propose dNESHA P A
. Ho w di dw e determin e th e sourc e categor y t o regulate ? B
. Wha t pollutant s ar e regulate dunde r thes e propose dNESHAP ? C
. Wha t i s th e "affecte dsource " an dho w di dEP A selec t

th e operation s t o b e regulate db y thes e propose dNESHAP ? D
. Wha t i s ane w affecte dsource ? E
. Ho w di dw e determin e th e MAC T floo r fo r existin g sources ? F
. Ho w di dw e determin e th e MAC T floo r fo r ne w sources ? G
. Di dw e conside r

option s mor e stringen t tha n th e MAC T floor ? H
. Wh y ar e som e reinforce dplasti c composite s productio n operation s no t subjec t t o thes e propose dNESHAP ? I
. Ho w di dw e selec t

th e propose d complianc e date s fo r

existin g an dne w sources ? J
. Ho w di dw e selec t

th e for mo f

thes e propose dNESHAP ? K
. Ho w di dw e selec t

th e tes t method s fo r determinin g complianc e wit hth e propose dNESHAP ? L
. Ho w di dw e determin e th e propose d monitorin g an drecordkeepin g requirements ? M
. Ho w di dw e selec t

th e propose d notificatio n an dreportin g requirements ? N
. Wha t ar e som e o f

th e area s wher e w e ar e specificall y solicitin g comments ? IV
. Summar y o f

Environmental , Energy , an d Economi c Impact s A
. Wha t facilitie s ar e affecte db y th e propose dNESHAP ? B
. Wha t ar e th e ai r

qualit y impacts ? C
. Wha t ar e th e wate r

qualit y impacts ? D
. Wha t ar e th e soli dan dhazardou s wast e impacts ? E
. Wha t ar e th e energ y impacts ? F
. Wha t ar e th e cos t

impacts ? G
. Wha t ar e th e economi c impacts ? V
. Relationshi p o f

Propose dNESHA Pt o Othe r Standard s an dProgram s unde r th e CA A A
. Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Close d Ven t Systems , Contro l Devices , Recover y Devices , an dRoutin g t o aFue l Ga s Syste mo r

aProces s (4 0 CFRPar t 63 , Subpar t SS ) B
. Operatin g Permi t

Progra m C
. NESHA Pfo r

Plasti c Part s an dProduct s VI
. Administrativ e Requirement s A
. Executiv e Orde r

12866 , Regulator y Plannin g an dRevie w B
. Paperwor k

Reductio n Ac t C
. Executiv e Orde r

13132 , Federalis m D
. Executiv e Orde r

13175 , Consultatio n an dCoordinatio n wit hIndia n Triba l Government s E
. Unfunde dMandate s Refor mAc t o f 199 5 F
. Regulator y Flexibilit y Ac t (RFA) , a s amende db y th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t

o f 199 6 (SBREFA) , 5 U.S.C
. 60 1 et seq. G
. Nationa l Technolog y Transfe r an d Advancemen t

Ac t H
. Executiv e Orde r

13045 , Protectio n o f Childre n fro mEnvironmenta l Healt h Risk s an dSafet y Risk sP. 5


### 4032 6 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRu^gs t I . Introductio n A. What Is the Source of

Authority for Development

of NESHAP? Sectio n11 2 o f

th e CA A require s u s t o lis t categorie s an dsubcategorie s o f majo r source s an dare asource s o f HA P an dt o establis hNESHA Pfo r th e liste d sourc e categorie s an dsubcategories
. Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio n(majo r

source s only ) wa s include do nth e initia l lis t o f sourc e categorie s publishe do nJul y 16,199 2 (5 7 F R31576)
. Majo r

source s o f

HA Par e thos e tha t

hav e th e potentia l t o emi t greate r tha n1 0 tp y o f

an y on e HA Po r 2 5 tp y o f an y combinatio no f

HAP
. B. What Criteria Are Used

in the Development

of NESHAP? Th e CA A require s NESHA Pt o reflec t th e maximu mdegre e o f reductio n i n emission s o f

HA Ptha t

i s achievable
. Thi s leve l o f

contro l i s commonl y referre dt o a s th e MACT
. Th e MAC T floo r

i s th e minimu m contro l leve l allowe dfo r NESHAP
. Thi s concep t appear s i nsectio n112(d)(3 ) o f th e CAA
. Fo r

ne w sources , th e MAC T floo r canno t b e les s stringen t

tha nth e emissio ncontro l tha t

i s achieve di n practic e b y th e best-controlle dsimila r source . Th e MAC T standard s fo r existin g source s ca nb e les s stringen t tha nstandard s fo r

ne w sources , bu t

the y canno t b e les s stringen t

tha nth e averag e emissio nlimitatio nachieve db y th e best-performin g 1 2 percen t o f existin g source s i nth e categor y o r subcategor y (o r th e best-performin g 5 source s fo r categorie s o r

subcategorie s wit hfewe r tha n3 0 sources)
. I ndevelopin g MACT , w e als o conside r contro l option s tha t

ar e mor e stringen t tha nth e floor
. W e ma y establis hstandard s mor e stringen t tha n th e floo r base do nth e consideratio no f cos t o f achievin g th e emission s ' reductions , an y nonai r qualit y healt h an denvironmenta l impacts , an denerg y requirements
. C. What Are the Potential

Health Effects of the HAPEmitted

by the Reinforced Plastic Composites Production Industry? Today' s propose dNESHA Pprotec t ai r qualit y an dpromot e th e publi c healt h b y reducin g emission s o f som e o f th e HA Pliste di nsectio n112(b)(1 ) o f th e CAA
. Th e HA Pemitte db y th e reinforce d plasti c composite s productio nindustr y include , bu t

ar e no t limite dto , approximatel y 20,00 0 tp y o f styrene , 55 0 tp y o f

methy l methacrylate , an d 110 0 tp y o f

methylen e chloride
. Exposur e t o thes e compound s ha s bee n demonstrate dt o caus e advers e healt h effects , includin g chroni c healt h disorder s (e.g. , headache , fatigue , an d depression ) an dacut e healt hdisorder s (e.g. , irritatio n o f

skin , eyes , an dmucou s membrane s an ddecrease drespirator y function)
. Methylen e chlorid e ha s bee n classifie da s aprobabl e huma n carcinoge n an dstyren e a s apossibl e huma ncarcinogen
. I n general , thes e finding s hav e onl y bee n show nwit h concentration s highe r

tha nthos e typicall y i nth e ambien t air
. W e d o no t

hav e th e typ e o f

curren t detaile ddat ao n eac ho f di e operation s covere db y today' s propose dNESHA P (an dth e peopl e livin g aroun dth e operations ) necessar y t o conduc t a n analysi s t o determin e th e actua l populatio nexposure s t o th e HA P emitte dfromthes e facilitie s an dth e potentia l fo r

resultan t

healt heffects
. Therefore , w e d o no t

kno w th e exten t

t o whic hth e advers e healt heffect s describe dabov e occu r

i n th e population s surroundin g thes e operations
. However , t o th e exten t th e advers e effect s d o occur , th e propose d rul e wil l reduc e emission s an d subsequen t

exposures . 1
. Styren e Acut e (short-term ) exposur e t o styren e i nhuman s result s i n mucou s membran e an dey e irritatio n an dgastrointestina l effects
. Chroni c (long-term ) exposur e t o styren e i nhuman s ma y caus e effect s o n th e centra l nervou s syste m(CNS ) suc h a s headache , fatigue , weakness , depression , an dhearin g loss
. Ther e i s limite devidenc e tha t

occupationa l exposur e t o styren e i s associate dwit h a nincrease dfrequenc y o f spontaneou s abortion s an ddecrease dfrequenc y o f birth s an da n increase dris k o f leukemia , an dlymphoma
. Th e EP A consider s thi s evidenc e o noccupationa l exposur e t o styren e t o b e inconclusive
. Th e Internationa l Agenc y fo r Researc ho n Cance r ha s classifie dstyren e a s aGrou p 2B , possibl e huma n carcinogen
. Th e EP A ha s no t

classifie dstyren e wit h respec t t o carcinogenicity
. 2
. Methyl
. Methacrylat e Methy l methacrylat e irritate s th e skin , eyes , an dmucou s membrane s i n humans
. A nallergi c respons e t o derma l exposur e ma y develop
. Respirator y effect s followin g acut e (short-term ) exposur e includ e ches t tightness , dyspnea , coughing , wheezing , an d reduce dlun g function
. Neurologica l symptom s includin g headache , lethargy , lightheadedness , an dasensatio n o f heavines s i nth e arm s an dleg s hav e als o bee nreporte dfollowin g acut e exposur e t o MMA
. Effect s t o th e liver , kidney , brain , spleen , an dbon e marro w hav e bee nreporte di n chroni c (long-term ) anima l studie s o f

MM A inhalation
. Feta l abnormalitie s hav e bee nreporte di n animal s expose dt o MM A b y injectio n an dinhalation
. I n severa l anima l studies , n o carcinogeni c effect s wer e observed
. Th e EP A ha s classifie dMM A i nGrou p E(no t

likel y t o b e carcinogeni c i n humans)
. 3
. Methylen e Chlorid e Acut e (short-term ) exposur e t o methylen e chlorid e b y inhalatio naffect s th e nervou s system , causin g decrease d visual , auditory , an dmoto r functions
. Thes e effect s ar e reversibl e onc e exposur e ceases . Th e effect s o f chroni c (long-term ) exposur e t o methylen e chlorid e sugges t

tha t th e CN S i s a potentia l targe t

i nbot hhuman s an d animals
. Limite danima l studie s hav e reporte ddevelopmenta l effects
. Huma n

. dat aar e inconclusiv e regardin g methylen e chlorid e an dcancer . Anima l studie s hav e show nincrease s i nlive r an dlun g cance r

an dbenig n mammar y glan dtumor s followin g th e inhalatio n o f methylen e chloride
. Th e EP A ha s classifie dmethylen e chlorid e a s a Grou p B2 , probabl e huma ncarcinogen
. D. How Were the Proposed NESHAP Developed? W e starte dth e developmen t o f th e propose dNESHA Pb y sendin g informatio n collectio nreques t (ICR ) survey s t o facilitie s wit happlicabl e standar dindustrie s classificatio n(SIC ) codes
. I n additio nt o thes e surveys , w e consulte dwit hnumerou s member s o f th e reinforce dplasti c composite s industry , representative s o f industr y trad e associations , an dmateria l an d equipmen t

vendor s i n developin g th e propose dNESHAP
. W e hel daserie s o f

approximatel y 3 5 meeting s an dvisite dapproximatel y 2 5 facilitie s ove r

aperio do f

8 years . Thes e meeting s an dsit e visit s wer e hel dto . kee p stakeholder s informe dan dt o gathe r additiona l dat aan dinformatio n o n issue s relevan t

t o th e propose d NESHAP
. Th e stakeholder s helpe di n dat agathering , arrange dsit e visits , identifie dissue s an dprovide d informatio n t o hel p resolv e issue s i n th e rulemakin g process . W e identifie dth e MAC T floo r contro l leve l wit hinformatio nobtaine dthroug h surve y responses , sit e visits , telephon e contacts , an doperatin g permits
. W e assesse dcontro l option s mor e stringen t tha nth e MAC T floo r

b y identifyin g th e level(s ) an dmethod(s ) o f contro l achieve db y th e bes t

controlle dsource s i nth e industr y an dconductin g analyse s designe dt o determin e th e cost , economic , energy , an denvironmenta l impact s o f

implementin g th e mor e stringen t contro l options
.P. 6

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 

### 4032 7 E. What Processes and

Operations Are Included in the Reinforced

Plastic * ' ' Composites Production Source Category? Th e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nsourc e categor y involve s th e productio no f

plasti c product s from cross-linkin g resins , usuall y i n combinatio nwit hreinforcin g material s and
. inorgani c fillers
. Th e productio no f product s tha t

d o no t contai nreinforcin g material s i s als o include di nthi s category , a s wel l a s th e productio no f intermediat e compound s whic har e late r use dt o mak e th e final plasti c products
. Thes e non-reinforce dproduct s wer e include dbecaus e the y ar e produce d usin g th e sam e type s o f resins , hav e simila r emissio ncharacteristic s an d woul dus e simila r

emissio ncontrols
. Thi s sourc e categor y i s limite dt o thos e resin s whic hcontai nstyrene , eithe r b y itsel f o r wit hacombinatio no f othe r monomer s o r

solvents
. Ther e ar e awid e variet y o f operation s tha t us e styrene-containin g resin s t o mak e thermose t

plastics
. Suc h productio noperation s includ e manua l resi napplication , mechanica l resi n application , filamen t

winding , ge l coa t application , compression/injectio n molding , resi ntransfe r molding , centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination/continuou s casting , polyme r casting , pultrusion , an dshee t moldin g compoun d(SMC ) manufacturing
. Ther e ar e als o ancillar y operation s suc ha s cleaning , mixing/bul k

moldin g compoun d(BMC ) manufacturing , an d storag e tha t

occu r i nconjunctio nwit h thes e productio noperations
. Man y facilitie s wil l us e multipl e operation s i n th e manufacturin g o f

thei r product
. Thi s categor y doe s no t

includ e facilitie s whic hrepai r

previousl y manufacture dreinforce dplasti c composites , bu t

d o no t hav e an y co locate dreinforce dplasti c composit e manufacturin g operations
. Th e reaso ni s tha t w e believ e tha t

repai r operation s tha t ar e co-locate dwit hmanufacturin g operation s us e th e sam e material s a s th e manufacturin g processes . Repai r operation s tha t

ar e no t co-locate dma y us e differen t

material s an dapplicatio n techniques
. II . Summar y o f

Propose d NESHA P Thi s preambl e sectio n discusse s th e propose dNESHA Pa s the y appl y t o you , th e owne r

o r operato r o f ane w o r existin g reinforce dplasti c composite s productio nfacility
. A. What Source Categories and Subcategories Are Affected by This Proposed Rule? Today' s propose drul e applie s t o th e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nsourc e category . W e evaluate dth e us e o f

subcategorie s base d o nsiz e (i.e. , tp y of

HA Pemitted)
. Thes e subcategorie s playe da nimportan t rol e i ndefinin g th e ne w sourc e MAC T floors
. However , th e availabl e dat atha t w e use dt o develo p th e MAC T floo r fo r existin g sources , d o no t sho w significan t difference s betwee n larger-emittin g versu s smaller-emittin g sources . Thus , w e di dno t

g o throug haseparat e analysi s fo r

eac hsubcategor y o f

existin g sources . B. What Are the Primary Sources of HAPEmissions and

What Are the Emissions? Th e primar y sourc e o f

HA Pemission s fromth e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nsourc e categor y i s th e evaporatio no f

styren e an dothe r

organi c liqui dHA Pcontaine di nth e resi n durin g th e applicatio nand/o r curin g o f th e resin
. Sinc e styren e participate s i n th e curin g reaction , no t al l o f i t i s emitted
. Th e HA Pemission s als o occu r durin g ancillar y operation s suc ha s deeming , mixing/BM C manufacturing , ari dstorage . Tota l baselin e HA Pemission s from th e Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio n sourc e categor y ar e approximatel y 22,20 0 tpy . Emission s fromspra y lay-u p an dge l coatin g constitut e approximatel y 5 6 percen t an d 1 9 percen t

o f th e tota l baselin e emissions , respectively
. Th e remainin g HA Pemission s ar e primaril y fromhan d lay-up/bucke t

an dtoo l application , compressio nmolding/injectio n molding , filamen t

winding , SM C manufacturing , an dcentrifuga l casting. , C. What Is the Affected

Source? Unde r thi s propose drule , th e affecte d

. sourc e woul db e th e combinatio n o f al l operation s regulate dunde r thes e standard s a t

areinforce dplasti c composite s productio n facility
. Th e followin g regulate doperation s ar e typicall y performe da t

reinforce dplasti c composite s productio nfacilitie s an dar e par t o f th e affecte dsource : ope n molding , close dmolding , centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination / continuou s casting , polyme r casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , equipmen t

cleaning , BMC / manufacturing/mixing , an dstorag e o f HA Pcontainin g materials
. D. What Are the Proposed

Emission Limits, Operating Limits, and Other Standards? W e ar e proposin g th e requirement s o f thes e NESHA Pi n th e for mo f emissio n limit s (i.e. , poin t

value , mas s rate , o r percen t reduction) , operatin g limits , an d wor k practic e standards
. Wor k practic e standard s includ e design , equipment ,

wor k practices , an doperationa l standards
. I ndevelopin g propose drequirement s fo r reinforce dplasti c composite s affecte dsources , w e hav e provide da n alternativ e forma t

wher e possible
. Fo r example , afacilit y meetin g a9 5 percen t emissio nreductio nrequiremen t fo r ope n moldin g processe s ca n alternativel y mee t

apoin t value
. W e hav e als o provide dalternative s fo r meetin g th e limit s fo r

continuou s laminatio n an dcontinuou s castin g processes . W e ar e proposin g athreshol dfo r existin g souroe s t o distinguis hbetwee n source s tha t

woul dmee t

th e floo r requirements , tha t

ar e generall y base d o npollutio n prevention , an dthos e tha t woul dhav e t o mee t

amor e stringen t above-the-floo r

requiremen t

base do n 9 5 percen t contro l o f

HA Pemissions
. Fo r smal l businesses , th e threshol di s 25 0 tp y o f combine dHA Pemission s fo r ope n molding , centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , an dSM C manufacturing
. Th e definitio no f

asmal l busines s fo r thi s sourc e categor y range s from50 0 t o 100 0 employees
. Mor e specifi c informatio no nth e definitio n o f asmal l busines s ma y b e foun di n th e discussio n o f th e Regulator y Flexibilit y Ac t i nth e Administrativ e Requirement s sectio n o f thi s preamble
. Fo r

businesse s tha t

ar e no t smal l businesses , th e threshol di s combine demission s o f HA Po f 10 0 tp y fromth e sam e operations
. Fo r al l ope nmoldin g operation s (i.e. , corrosion-resistant , noncorrosion

resistant , tooling , an dge l coat ) an d centrifuga l castin g (corrosion-resistan t an dnoncorrosion-resistant ) a t existin g source s belo w th e threshold , an dne w source s wit hHA Pemission s les s tha n 10 0 tpy , yo u mus t

compl y wit haHA P emissio nlimi t

tha t i s calculate dfo r

you r facilit y usin g MAC T mode l poin t valu e equation s fo r

eac hope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g operation
. Fo r ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g ' operation s a t

ne w source s wit hHA P emission s equa l t o o r

greate r tha n 10 0 tpy , an dexistin g source s wit hHA P emission s equa l t o o r

greate r tha n th e applicabl e threshold s (i.e. , 10 0 tp y fo r larg e businesse s an d25 0 tp y fo r smal l businesses) , w e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s t o reduc e emission s b y 9 5 percen t fro mthes e operation s o r

compl y wit ha correspondin g HA Pemissio n limi t calculate dusin g th e MAC T mode l poin t valu e equations
. W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s o f

continuou s lamination / continuou s castin g operation s a t existin g source s belo w th e above-the

-P. 7


### 4032 8 

### Federal Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRules- ; floor applicabilit y thresholds , an dne w source s wit hHA Pemission s les s tha n 10 0 tpy , t o reduc e emission s b y 5 8 percent . Othe r

ne w an dexistin g source s mus t reduc e emission s b y 9 5 percent . W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s o f

pultrusio noperation s a t existin g source s belo w th e above-the

floo r thresholds , an dne w source s wit h HA Pemission s les s tha n10 0 tpy , t o reduc e emission s b y 6 0 percent . Thi s reductio ni s base do napplyin g awe t enclosur e o r

usin g direc t

di e injectio nt o limi t emissions
. Othe r

ne w an dexistin g source s mus t

reduc e emission s b y 9 5 percent . W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s a t

bot hne w an dexistin g source s usin g injection/compressio n moldin g operation s t o reduc e HA P emission s throug hdi e us e o f awor k practice , whereb y onl y on e charg e pe r machin e i s uncovered , unwrapped , o r expose dpe r

mol dcycl e pe r

• compression/injectio nmoldin g machine
. W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s . an doperator s o f

shee t moldin g compoun doperation s a t existin g source s belo w th e above-the-floo r thresholds , an dne w source s wit hHA P emission s les s tha n10 0 tpy , t o reduc e emission s b y usin g anylo nfilm, o r film wit hequa l o r

lowe r permeabilit y t o styrene , t o enclos e thei r SM C operation
. Othe r ne w an dexistin g source s mus t reduc e emission s b y 9 5 percent . W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s o f

al l ne w an dexistin g reinforce dplasti c composite s affecte d source s t o us e cleaner s containin g n o HAP
. W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s o f

resi nmixin g an dbul k moldin g compoun doperation s a t existin g source s belo w th e above-the

floo r applicabilit y thresholds , an dne w source s wit hHA Pemission s les s tha n 10 0 tpy , t o limi t

HA Pemission s b y coverin g mixer s suc htha t ther e ar e n o visibl e gaps . Fo r

othe r ne w an dexistin g sources , w e ar e proposin g t o requir e tha t yo u reduc e emission s frommixin g .an d BM C manufacturin g b y 9 5 percent . Fo r existin g source s tha t

ar e subjec t

t o th e above-the-floo r

contro l leve l o f

9 5 percen t HA Pemissio nreduction , w e examine da nalternative , base do n pollutio nprevention , tha t woul db e mor e effectiv e tha nth e requirement s o f th e MAC T floo r

fo r existin g sources . However , w e wer e unabl e t o develo p a n acceptabl e alternativ e t o includ e i nth e propose dstandard s tha t meet s th e statutor y requirement s o f MACT
. W e ar e solicitin g commen t

o napossibl e •alternative
. W e ar e proposin g t o requir e al l owner s an doperator s a t an y existin g o r ne w affecte dsourc e t o kee p al l organi c

HAP-containin g storag e vessel s covered , excep t durin g th e additio n o r remova l o f materials
. E. What Is the MACT^Model

Point Value and How Is It

Used in These Proposed NESHAP? Th e MAC T mode l poin t valu e i s a numbe r calculate dfo r

eac hope n moldin g operatio nan dcentrifuga l castin g operatio n an di s asurrogat e fo r emissions
. Th e MAC T mode l poin t valu e i s awa y t o ran k

th e relativ e performanc e o f

differen t resi nan dge l coa t emission s reductio n techniques
. Thi s approac hallow s yo u t o creat e contro l strategie s usin g differen t resi n an dge l coa t

emission s reductio n techniques
. Th e propose dstandard s

. provid e equation s t o calculat e MAC T mode l poin t

value s base do n HA P conten t an dapplicatio nmetho dfo r eac h materia l tha t

yo u use . Thes e MAC T mode l poin t

value s ar e the n average d an dcompare dt o limit s i nth e propose d standard s t o determin e i f you r ope n moldin g operation s ar e i n compliance
. Th e MAC T model.poin t value s hav e .unit s o f pound s o f

HA Ppe r

to no f resi n o r ge l coa t applied
. I t

i s importan t

t o not e tha t th e MAC T mode l poin t value s ar e surrogate s fo r

emissions , an dth e MAC T mode l poin t

valu e equation s ar e use donl y fo r

determinin g complianc e wit hth e propose dReinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nNESHAP
. Th e MAC T mode l poin t

valu e equation s canno t b e use di nplac e o f

emissio n factorequation s t o demonstrat e complianc e wit hothe r regulations
. Th e MAC T mode l poin t valu e equation s onl y accoun t fo r HA Pconten t an dapplicatio n method
. Othe r factor s (includin g curin g time , par t thickness , an doperato r

technique ) als o affec t emissions , an dthes e factor s ar e no t accounte dfo r

i n th e MAC T mode l poin t valu e equation s fo r

reason s discusse din ' sectio nIII-E
. Determinin g th e HA P conten t o f material s an dth e metho do f applicatio n i s relativel y simple , an d thes e factor s ar e th e mos t significan t

i n affectin g emissions
. Mor e informatio n o nth e developmen t

o f thi s mode l i s availabl e i nth e docket
. F. When Would

I Need To Comply With These Proposed

NESHAP? W e Eir e proposin g tha t

al l existin g source s compl y withi n 3 year s o f publicatio no f

th e promulgate d NESHA Pi nth e Federa l Register . Ne w affecte dsource s tha t

startu p befor e th e promulgate dNESHA Par e publishe di n th e Federa l Registe rmus t compl y n o late r tha nth e effectiv e dat e o f th e NESHAP , whic hwil l b e th e sam e a s th e publicatio ndate
. Ne w affecte dsource s tha t startu p afte r

th e promulgate d NESHA Par e publishe di nth e Federa l Registe rmus t

compl y upo n startup . Existin g are asource s tha t increas e thei r emission s o r

thei r potentia l t o emi t

suc h tha t the y becom e amajo r

sourc e o f

HA P mus t b e i n complianc e withi n 3 year s o f th e dat e the y becom e amajo r source . Ne w are asource s tha t

becom e majo r source s o f

HA Pmus t

compl y upo n becomin g amajo r

source . Al l ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g operation s tha t

compl y b y meetin g a specifie dpoin t

valu e o n a12-mont h rollin g averag e wil l hav e 1 yea r fromth e complianc e dat e t o demonstrat e compliance
. W e ar e proposin g t o provid e ne w an d existin g facilitie s 3 year s t o compl y from th e tim e thei r

HA Pemission s reac ho r excee dth e applicabilit y threshold s requirin g th e installatio n o f add-o n - controls , i f

thes e HA Pemission s mcrease s occu r

afte r thei r initia l complianc e date
. G. What Are the Proposed

Options for Demonstrating Compliance? Today' s propose dNESHA Pprovid e severa l option s fo r

compliance
. W e ar e providin g thes e option s t o affor d industr y th e flexibilit y t o decid e whic h metho di s bes t

suite dfo r

eac hparticula r situation
. 1
. Ope n Moldin g an dCentrifuga l Castin g Operation s Fo r ope nmoldin g operation s a t .existin g an dne w sources , thi s proposa l woul dallo w yo u t o choos e t o compl y b y meetin g th e individua l MAC T poin t valu e fo r eac hoperatio n a t

you r affecte d source , o r

b y meetin g th e weighte d averag e MAC T poin t

valu e fo r

al l ope n moldin g operation s a t

you r affecte d source . Iri addition , i f

yo u hav e an y combinatio n o f

manua l resi n application , mechanica l resi n application , filamen t

winding , o r centrifuga l castin g operation s a t you r affecte dsource , yo u coul dcompl y b y meetin g th e MAC T poin t valu e fo r

an y on e o f thes e operation s an db y usin g th e sam e resi n fo r

al l th e othe r

operations
. Fo r ope nmoldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g operation s wher e th e propose d rul e woul drequir e yo u t o mee t a percen t reduction , yo u coul dus e a n add-o ncontro l devic e t o achiev e th e require dreductio n o r

yo u ma y choos e t o mee t aMAC T poin t

valu e tha t correspond s t o tha t

particula r operation' s percen t

reduction
. 2
. Continuou s Casting/Laminatio n Operation s Fo r continuou s casting/laminatio n operation s a t

existin g an dne w sources , w e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u coul dP. 8

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No T 149/Thursday , Augus t 2, 1 2b01/Propose dRule s 4032 9 demonstrat e tha t

eac hcontinuou s - »d - castin g lin e an deac hcontinuou s H?7 V laminatio nlin e meet s th e appropriat e standard
. Alternatively , yo u coul d averag e al l you r

continuou s castin g an d continuou s laminatio n line s together , an ddemonstrat e tha t

the y mee t

th e appropriat e standard
. A nadditiona l alternativ e woul db e t o captur e you r emission s fromyou r

wet-ou t are ai na permanen t

tota l enclosur e tha t

meet s EPA' s criteria , a s specifie di nMetho d 20 4 i nappendi x M o f

4 0 CF Rpar t

51 , an dven t thes e wet-ou t

emission s throug haclose dven t

syste mt o a contro l devic e achievin g 9 5 percen t reductio no f

HA Pemissions
. Unde r thi s propose drule , dies e alternative s coul d b e use di ncombinatio nt o demonstrat e compliance
. 3
. Pultrusio nOperation s Fo r existin g an dne w pultrusio n operations , unde r

thi s propose drul e yo u coul dcaptur e an dven t you r emission s t o acontro l devic e tha t achieve s th e require dpercen t reductio n o f EHA Pemissions
. Yo u coul dals o elec t t o us e direc t

di e injectio npultrusio n machine s wit hresi ndri p collectio n system s tha t

mee t th e criteri aspecified
. W e ar e als o proposin g a n additiona l - alternativ e onl y availabl e t o existin g sources : th e us e o f

awet-are aenclosur e wit haresi ndri p collectio nsystem . Fo r bot hne w an dexistin g sources , yo u coul dus e th e availabl e option s i n combinatio nt o achiev e complianc e unde r thi s propose drule
. 4
. Ancillar y Operation s Fo r ancillar y operation s a t al l sources , suc ha s cleaning , storage , an dmixing / BM C operation s a t

existin g sources , th e onl y optio nw e ar e proposin g i s t o compl y wit hth e specifie dwor k practic e standards
. H. What Are the Testing and

Initial Compliance Requirements? W e ar e proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s o f

al l affecte dsource s whic hus e acontro l devic e t o demonstrat e complianc e t o conduc t a n initia l performanc e tes t usin g specifie d EP A tes t methods
. Th e owne r

o r operato r woul dtes t

a t th e inle t an d oude t o f th e contro l device , an dusin g thes e results , calculat e apercen t reduction
. W e ar e als o proposin g t o requir e owner s an doperator s tha t us e permanen t

tota l enclosure s t o conduc t a desig nevaluatio na s specifie db y EP A Metlio d204
. If

you r enclosur e doe s no t mee t th e requirement s fo r

apermanen t tota l enclosure , yo u woul dnee dt o tes t th e enclosur e usin g EP A Mediod s 204 B throug hEt o determin e th e captur e efficiency
. Prio r t o th e initia l performanc e test , owner s an doperator s of affecte dsource s woul db e require dt o instal l th e paramete r

monitoring.equipmen t t o b e use dt o demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e operatin g limits
. Durin g th e initia l performanc e test , th e owner s an d operator s woul dus e th e paramete r monitorin g equipmen t

t o establis h operatin g paramete r

limits
. /
. What Are the Continuous Compliance Requirements? If yo u us e a nadd-o ncontro l device , w e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u monito r

an d recor dth e operatin g parameter s establishe ddurin g th e initia l performanc e test , an dcalculat e averag e operatin g paramete r

value s average d ove r th e perio do f

tim e specifie di n thes e propose dNESHA Pt o demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit hth e operatin g limits
. If yo u us e th e MAC T poin t valu e syste mt o maintai n apoin t valu e les s tha no r equa l t o th e appropriat e poin t valu e liste di n today' s propose d NESHAP , w e ar e proposin g t o requir e tha t yo u calculat e th e poin t valu e on e tim e i f th e resin s o r

ge l coat s use di nth e operatio nremai nth e same , o r i f al l th e resin s an dge l coat s use dindividuall y mee t th e require dpoin t

values
. Yo u ar e require dt o calculat e th e poin t valu e o n a12-mont hrollin g averag e eac hmont h i f th e resi n o r

ge l coa t varie s betwee n operation s o r

ove r time , an dno t

al l resin s o r ge l coat s take n individuall y mee t th e require dpoin t

value
. If yo u ar e complyin g wit hwor k practic e standards , w e ar e proposin g tha t yo u demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e wor k practic e standard s i n today' s propose dNESHA Pb y performin g th e necessar y wor k

practice s an db y keepin g arecor dcertifyin g tha t yo u ar e i ncomplianc e wit hth e wor k practices
. /
. What Are the Proposed

Notification, Reporting, and

Recordkeeping Requirements? W e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u submi t Initia l Notification , Notificatio n o f Performanc e Tests , an dNotificatio no f Complianc e Statu s report s b y th e specifie ddate s i n di e propose d NESHAP , whic hma y var y dependin g o nwhethe r

th e affecte dsourc e i s ne w o r existing
. Yo u woul dals o nee dt o submi t semiannua l complianc e reports . If yo u tak e actio n tha t

i s inconsisten t

wit h you r approve dstartup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n(SSM ) plan , the n yo u woul dnee dt o submi t

SS M report s withi n 2 day s o f

startin g suc haction , an dwithi n7 day s of endin g suc h action
. W e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u kee p a cop y o f eac hnotificatio n an dreport , alon g wit hsupportin g documentatio n fo r 5 years . O f

thi s time , tii e firs t

2 year s mus t b e on-site
. Yo u woul dnee dt o kee p record s relate dt o SSM , record s o f performanc e tests , an drecord s fo r eac h continuou s paramete r

monitorin g system . Unde r

thi s propose drule , i f

yo u mus t compl y wit hth e wor k practic e standards , yo u woul dals o nee dt o kee p record s certifyin g tiiat

yo u ar e i n complianc e wit hth e wor k practice s fo r 5 years . If

yo u ar e us e th e MAC T poin t valu e syste mt o demonstrat e compliance , yo u woul dnee dt o kee p al l data , assumptions , an dcalculation s use dt o determin e you r MAC T poin t value
. Fo r

ne w an dexistin g continuou s lamination/castin g operations , yo u woul dals o nee dt o kee p th e followin g record s whe n complyin g wi*t hth e percen t reductio n p r

poun dpe r

to n requirements : Al l data , assumptions , an dcalculation s use dt o determin e th e percen t reductio nand/o r

pound s pe r ton , a s applicable ; abrie f descriptio n o f th e rational e fo r

th e assignmen t

o f a n equatio n o r

facto r t o eac hformula ; al l data , assumptions , an dcalculation s use dt o deriv e facility-specifi c emissio n estimation s an dfactors ; identificatio n an drational e fo r

th e worst-cas e scenario ; an ddocumentatio n tha t th e appropriat e regulator y agenc y ha s approve dal l emissio n estimatio n equation s an dfactors
. EQ
. Rational e fo rPropose d NESHA P A. How Did

We Determine the Source Category To Regulate? Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nwa s include do n th e initia l lis t o f sourc e categorie s publishe do n Jul y 16 , 199 2 (5 7 F R31576)
. I n establishin g th e sourc e categor y list , w e state dtha t

w e woul drefin e categor y description s durin g th e rulemakin g process , i f

necessary , base do n additiona l informatio navailable
. W e di dno t findi t necessar y t o refin e th e sourc e categor y descriptio n fo r Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Production ; However , w e di ddefin e a numbe r o f differen t proces s grouping s i norde r t o develo p representativ e MAC T floor s a s describe di n th e sectio n o nMAC T floo r

development
. B. What Pollutants Are Regulated Under These Proposed

NESHAP? Th e propose dNESHA Pregulat e tota l HA Prathe r

tha nindividua l HA P compounds
. Standard s fo r tota l HA P simplify complianc e an denforcemen t compare dwit hstandard s fo r individua lP. 9



### 4033 0 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s HA Pcompounds
. Styren e i s th e HA P emitte di nth e larges t

magnitude
. Othe r HA Pemitte dfromreinforce dplasti c composite s productio nfacilitie s includ e MM A an dmethylen e chloride
. C. What Is the "Affected

Source"

and How Did EPA Select

the Operations To Be Regulated

by These Proposed NESHAP? T o provid e complianc e flexibility, w e define dth e affecte dsourc e a s th e combinatio no f

al l reinforce dplasti c composite s operation s a t asite
. Thi s broa dsourc e definitio nallow s a manufacture r

t o determin e complianc e b y averagin g th e HA Pconten t o f differen t product s use dthroughou t th e facility , withi ncertai ndefine d operations , an dt o us e differen t applicatio ntechnique s a s neede dt o mee t produc t qualit y specifications
. D. What Is a New Affected

Source? A ne w affecte dsourc e i s an y reinforce dplasti c composite s productio nfacilit y tha t meet s bot ho f thes e criteria :
• I t commence dconstructio nafte r today' s date ; an d
• I t i s a t asit e tha t

doe s no t

presentl y contai nan y reinforce dplasti c composite s productio noperations
. I nsectio n11 2 o f

th e CAA , th e definitio no f

ne w source s als o include s stationar y source s tha t

commenc e reconstructio nafte r

th e publicatio ndat e o f apropose dNESHAP
. Th e Smal l Busines s Advocac y Revie w (SBAR ) Pane l recommende dtha t w e carefull y revie w ou r

definitio no f

reconstructio n fo r thi s industry
. A s define di nth e Genera l Provision s fo r

4 0 CF Rpar t

63 , "reconstruction " mean s th e replacemen t o f component s o f

a naffected , o r

a previousl y unaffected , stationar y sourc e t o suc ha nexten t

that : (1 ) th e fixed capita l cos t

o f th e ne w component s exceed s 5 0 percen t

o f th e fixe dcapita l cos t tha t woul db e require dt o construc t acomparabl e ne w source ; an d(2 ) i t i s technologicall y an deconomicall y feasibl e fo r

th e reconstructe dsourc e t o mee t th e relevan t

standard s (a s establishe db y th e Administrato r o r a State ) pursuan t

t o sectio n11 2 o f

th e CAA
. W e envisio ntha t

th e type s o f

change s tha t woul dtypicall y occu r a t existin g facilitie s woul dinclud e replacemen t o f spra y equipmen t

an dmolds
. W e d o no t believ e tha t

i t woul db e technologicall y an deconomicall y feasibl e fo r a n existin g sourc e makin g thes e type s o f change s t o mee t

ne w sourc e MACT
. Thus , suc hchange s d o no t mee t th e definitio no f

reconstructio ni nth e Genera l Provision s an dwoul dno t subjec t th e source s makin g suc h change s t o ne w sourc e MACT
. E. How Did

We Determine the MACT Floor for Existing Sources? Severa l consideration s underli e ou r MAC T floor

determinations
. Thes e consideration s include : if/ho w th e sourc e categor y i s t o b e subcategorized , ho w emission s type s withi nth e affecte d sourc e ar e t o b e analyzed , an dwha t ar e th e bes t performin g sources . W e identifie d43 3 facilitie s tha t ar e majo r source s base do nthei r potentia l t o emi t o r hav e th e potentia l t o b e majo r source s base do n collocatio n wit hothe r HAP-emittin g processe s no t par t o f thi s sourc e category . If technica l difference s i nemission s characteristics , processes , contro l devic e applicability , o r

opportunitie s fo r pollutio npreventio nexis t withi nth e sourc e category , i t

ma y b e appropriat e t o se t separat e floor s base do n thes e characteristics
. I nanalyzin g th e availabl e dat ao n thi s sourc e category , i t wa s apparen t

tha t reinforce dplasti c composit e facilities , a s awhole , ar e extremel y divers e i nthei r emission s characteristics , contro l devic e applicability , an dopportunitie s fo r pollutio nprevention
. Therefore , w e explore dvariou s way s o f groupin g th e operation s tha t

ma y b e presen t

a t thes e facilities
. Fo r existin g sources , i t

wa s apparen t tha t almos t al l o f th e existin g sourc e floors woul db e base do npollution

preventio ntechnique s suc ha s lowerin g th e HA Pconten t

i n resin s an dge l coats , coverin g bath s an dcontainer s holdin g resins , an dusin g nonatomize dspra y applications
. Th e exten t an d performanc e o f

pollution-preventio n technique s ar e dependen t o n th e specifi c operation
. Fo r

thi s reason , th e dat awer e subdivide db y specifi c operation , an dafloor

fo r eac hoperatio n wa s developed
. Operation s wer e segregate db y severa l factors
. Th e firs t

wa s mol dtyp e (i.e. , open , partiall y open , an dclosed)
. W e als o segregate doperation s b y resi n an d ge l coa t applicatio nmethod ; thes e includ e mechanical , manual , filamen t winding , an dcentrifuga l casting
. Th e typ e o f mol dan dresi napplicatio n metho dimpact s th e emissio n potentia l o f aparticula r

operatio nan dals o th e effectivenes s an dapplicabilit y o f differen t contro l tecliniques
. W e als o segregate dcontinuou s operation s suc h a s pultrusion , continuou s lamination , continuou s casting , an dth e manufactur e o f

shee t moldin g compound
. Tn e final criteri ause dwa s produc t type . Th e require dpropertie s o f th e fina l produc t

plac e certai n constraint s o nth e ra w material s tha t ca nb e used
. This , i nturn , influence s th e limit s o n level s o f EHA Pi nth e ra w materials
. W e identifie dsevera l produc t criteri awher e th e ra w material s require dt o produc e th e produc t

ar e dissimila r

enoug htha t aseparat e floor

determinatio n wa s required
. Th e firs t

i s corrosio n resistance
. Reinforce dplasti c composite s ca n generall y b e divide d int o tw o types—corrosion-resistan t an d noncorrosion-resistan t

products
. Corrosion-resistan t

product s requir e resin s specificall y formulate dfo r corrosion-resistan t

applications
. W e als o include dhigh-strengti i application s i n th e corrosion-resistan t

grouping
. Thes e application s includ e product s suc ha s structura l member s an dutilit y poles
. Thes e requir e resin s wit hhighe r HA P content s tha n genera l purpos e resins
. Th e highe r

HA Pcontent s fo r

bot h corrosion-resistan t

an dhigh-strengt h application s ar e necessar y t o produc e a laminat e wit hagreate r concentratio n o f styren e cross-linking
. Thi s highe r leve l o f cross-linkin g i s necessar y fo r eithe r corrosion-resistanc e o r high-strength
. W e als o separate dge l coat s from resin s becaus e thes e material s hav e significantl y differen t

function s i n th e final produc t

an dar e formulate d differently
. Ge l coat s wer e furthe r subdivide dint o clear , whit e an doff

white , an dothe r

colors
. Clea r

ge l coat s requir e significantl y highe r HA Pconten t tha npigmente dge l coats , an dare , therefore , unabl e t o b e formulate dt o th e sam e HA Plevels
. Whit e an doff-whit e ge l coat s ca n b e formulate dt o lowe r HA Pcontent s o naweight-percen t basi s tha n othe r

color s du e t o th e fac t

tha t whit e pigment s ar e heavie r tha n othe r colo r pigments
. Clas s 1 fir e an dsmok e rate dproduct s wer e separate dfromothe r product s becaus e thei r

uniqu e propertie s requir e aresi n wit hasignificanti y highe r HA P conten t tha nany . othe r

products
. Separatin g Clas s 1 fir e an dsmok e rate d product s wa s als o on e o f th e recommendation s o f

th e SBA RPanel
. Toolin g resin s an dge l coat s ar e use d t o mak e th e mold s that , i n turn , ar e use d t o produc e reinforce dplasti c parts . Mold s mus t

hav e differen t

propertie s compare dt o th e product s the y ar e use d t o produce
. Thes e includ e ahig hleve l o f dimensiona l stabilit y an dresistanc e t o hea t compare dt o othe r

reinforce d plasti c composites
. Therefore , separat e floors wer e develope dfo r toolin g resin s an dge l coats . Onc e th e dat awer e subdivide db y specifi c operation , th e dat awer e ranke d b y HA Pemissions
. Ope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g operation s wer e ranke dbase do n asurrogat e ejnissio n facto r calle dapoin t

value
. A sP.1 0

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4033 1 previousl y discussed , poin t value s ar e base do nresi nan dge l coa t applicatio n metho dan dHA Pcontent , an dprovid e arelativ e measur e o f

emission s betwee n operation s wit hvaryin g resi nan dge l coa t HA Pcontent s an dapplicatio n methods
. Othe r factor s suc ha s ge l time, par t thickness , applicatio n temperature , an d operato r techniqu e als o affec t

emissions
. However , ther e ar e les s dat aavailabl e t o determin e th e effect s o f thes e factor s i n aproductio nsetting
. I naddition , som e o f thes e factors , suc ha s par t thickness , ar e inheren t

t o th e proces s an dcanno t b e change dwithou t

changin g th e fina l product
. Fo r

thi s reason , othe r

factor s ar e no t include di nth e MAC T mode l poin t valu e equations
. Th e poin t valu e syste mwa s als o develope dt o allo w a facilit y t o averag e differen t operation s togethe r t o mee t th e applicabl e propose dstandards
. Th e abilit y t o averag e i s intende dt o provid e additiona l complianc e flexibility. Th e individua l operation s wer e the n ranke dbase do nth e poin t valu e (fo r ope nmoldin g an dcentrifuga l casting) , percen t o f emissio nreductio n (pultrusion , continuou s lamination / casting , SM C manufacturing) , coverin g ope ncontainer s o r

expose dresi n (storage , BM C manufacturing/mixing , injection/compressio nmolding) , o r th e us e o nnon-HA Pcleanin g solvent s (equipmen t

cleaning)
. Th e media n facilit y ofth e to p 1 2 percen t (o r to p 5 fo r operation s wit hles s tha n3 0 sources)

- wa s the nselecte da s representin g th e existin g sourc e floor
. Fo r som e o f thes e operations , th e availabl e dat awer e insufficien t t o perfor maranking
. Thes e wer e non whit e pigmente dge l coats , product s wit haClas s 1 fire an dsmok e rating , an d high-strengt hproducts
. W e identifie dtw o facilitie s tha t produc e product s tha t

requir e aClas s 1 fir e an dsmok e rating
. Bot hfacilitie s us e aresi nwit ha6 0 percen t EHA Pcontent . W e chos e us e o f

thi s resi na s th e floor. Fro ma6 0 percen t

HA Presin , w e calculate ddifferen t

poin t value s fo r mechanical , manual , an dfilamen t windin g resi napplication
. Th e dat aw e use dt o se t floors fo r pigmente dge l coat s wer e weighte d average s reporte db y th e facilities
. Thi s dat ainclude dsom e informatio no n colors , bu t

no t enoug hfacilitie s reporte d colo r informatio nt o perfor ma meaningfu l ranking
. Becaus e o f th e predominanc e o f

whit e an doff-whit e ge l coats , thes e dat aar e no t representativ e fo r

othe r colors
. However , man y facihtie s offer othe r colors
. Th e pigment s use di n whit e an d off-whit e ge l coat s ar e muc hdense r tha n th e pigment s use di n othe r colors
. Fo r tha t

reason , weigh t

percen t EHA Pi n whit e an doff-whit e ge l coat s tend s t o b e lower
. A floo r

base do n whit e an doff

whit e ge l coa t

HA Pcontent s woul d preclud e afacilit y usin g othe r colors
. Base do n industr y comment s an dth e recommendatio no f

th e SBA Rpanel , w e determine dtha t

aHA Pconten t

o f 3 7 percen t i s th e minimu mtha t

woul d provid e acceptabl e ge l coa t performanc e fo r ge l coat s wit hcolor s othe r tha n whit e an doff-white
. I n th e absenc e o f an y othe r

data , w e adopte da3 7 percen t HA Pa s th e floo r

fo r thes e ge l coats . Th e 3 7 percen t

HA Pconten t

wa s converte d t o apoin t

valu e usin g th e appropriat e poin t valu e equation
. (Se e th e final repor t o f th e SBA RPane l i nth e docket. ) W e reques t

comment s an dsupporting ' dat ao n th e appropriatenes s of 3 7 percen t a s aminimu mHA Pconten t fo r acceptabl e performanc e fo r ge l coat s wit hcolor s othe r

tha nwhit e an doff

white
. Th e dat asupplie db y industr y di dno t differentiat e product s tha t requir e highe r tha n typica l strengt hproperties
. Therefore , w e coul dno t determin e a floor wit hth e facilit y dat abase
. W e discusse dthi s issu e a s par t o f th e SBA R Pane l wit hsevera l manufacturer s tha t produc e high-strengt hproducts
. W e als o reviewe dth e requirement s o f Sout h Coas t Ai r Qualit y Managemen t

Distric t Rul e 1162
. Rul e 116 2 specificall y addresse s high-strengt hproduct s an d contain s th e sam e requirement s fo r high-strengt hproduct s an dcorrosion

resistan t products
. A s aresult , w e determine dusin g th e dat afo r corrosion

resistan t resin s woul db e th e mos t appropriat e wa y t o determin e floors fo r high-strengd i products
. Therefore , w e ar e proposin g th e sam e floors fo r high

strengt hproduct s an dcorrosion

resistan t products
. Thi s i s consisten t wit harecommendatio n o f th e SBA R Panel
. W e solici t

comment s o n thi s approach
. Ther e ar e man y facilitie s tha t us e multipl e operation s t o produc e a product
. A nexampl e o f thi s woul db e afacilit y producin g corrosion-resistan t tank s usin g filamen t

windin g t o produc e th e mai ncircula r

portion , mechanica l resi napplicatio n fo r

th e tan k ends , an d manua l resi napplicatio n t o joi nth e part s together
. Industr y representative s pointe dou t

tha t th e floors w e ha d develope dfromth e dat abas e woul d potentiall y requir e afacilit y t o us e thre e differen t resin s t o produc e asingl e product
. Thi s coul dpotentiall y lea dt o problem s o f

resi n compatibilit y an d produc t failures
. Th e SBA RPane l repor t include darecommendatio ntha t w e allo w afacilit y t o us e th e sam e resi n fo r al l processes . A s aresult , w e reexamine dth e floors fo r facilitie s wit hmultipl e processes . W e determme dthat , base do n th e dat a available , th e appropriat e approac h woul db e t o hav e aprovisio ni n th e propose dstandard s t o allo w afacilit y t o selec t on e operation , determin e th e resi nthe y coul dus e t o mee t th e floor , an dthe n us e tha t

sam e resi n i n al l otiie r operations
. W e di dno t hav e th e dat at o •determin e wha t

tha t operatio nshoul d b e i nal l cases , s o w e ar e no t specifyin g aparticula r

operatio ni n th e propose d standards
. W e assume dtha t afacilit y woul dselec t

th e operatio ntha t

allow s the mt o us e th e highes t HA Pconten t resin
. A t th e recommendatio no f th e SBA R Panel , w e als o reexamine dth e floor s fo r toolin g resins
. Severa l of th e smal l entit y representative s tha t advise dth e pane l state dtha t

th e propose dfloor

fo r toolin g resin s wil l resul t i n inferio r qualit y tools
. W e believ e tha t th e curren t floor fo r toolin g resin s allow s sufficien t flexibility i n resi n HA P conten t a s lon g a s th e resi nca n b e applie dwit hnonatomize dspra y technology
. W e ar e specificall y solicitin g commen t

o nth e applicabilit y o f nonatomize dspra y technolog y t o . toolin g resins
. Base do nan y comments , w e inten dt o furthe r

examin e th e floor fo r toolin g resins
. F
. How Did

We Determine the MACT Floor For New Sources? I ndevelopin g th e floor fo r ne w sources , w e develope dtw o subcategories—source s wit hemission s o f 10 0 tp y o r

abov e an dsource s wit h emission s belo w 10 0 tpy . Ou r reaso nfo r examinin g source s wit hemission s belo w 10 0 tp y separatel y i s tha t suc h facilitie s ar e likel y t o hav e mor e difficult y maintainin g an doperatin g add-o ncontrol s tha nlarger-emittin g sources , an dw e ar e unsur e ofth e performanc e o f

add-o n control s a t

thes e facilities
. Separatin g th e dat aint o larg e an dsmal l HAP-emittin g source s fo r developin g ne w sourc e MAC T floor s wa s als o on e o f

th e recommendation s o f th e SBA RPanel
. I nexaminin g th e facilitie s wit h emission s o f

10 0 tp y o r

more , w e foun d tw o facilitie s tha t

contro l emission s fromope n moldin g an dmixin g b y 9 5 percen t overall
. Thes e facilitie s rang e i n siz e fromapproximatel y 10 0 tp y t o 100 0 tp y o f HA Pemission s prio r

t o th e add

o n contro l device
. Thi s leve l o f contro l wa s chose n a s th e ne w sourc e MAC T floor fo r ope nmoldin g an dmixin g a t facilitie s wit h10 0 tp y o r mor e o f uncontrolle demissions
. W e als o considere dwhethe r t o evaluat e th e applicabilit y o f add-o n control s t o eac ho f

th e differen tP.1 1


### 4033 2 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s operation s a s wa s don e i nsettin g floors fo r existin g sources . Th e tw o facilitie s tha t contro l emission s b y 9 5 percen t hav e operation s includin g ge l coa t an d mechanica l resi napplication
. Th e performanc e an dcos t

o f add-o ncontrol s i s mainl y afunctio no f ai r flow s an d HA Pconcentratio nfromth e process . W e hav e n o dat at o sugges t tha t th e ai r flows an dHA Pconcentration s presen t i nothe r ope nmoldin g productio n processe s i nthi s industr y ar e no t adequatel y represente db y thes e tw o facilities
. Th e tw o facilitie s produc e part s tha t rang e i nsiz e fromtha t

o f bathtub s t o truc k caps . I t i s possibl e tha t

large r siz e part s ma y requir e large r enclosures
. W e hav e no t identifie dan y facilitie s i nth e reinforce dplasti c composite s industr y wher e processe s producin g larg e parts , suc ha s storag e tank s an dswimmin g pools , hav e applie d10 0 percen t efficien t captur e systems . However , w e hav e identifie dfacilitie s usin g 10 0 percen t efficien t captur e system s tha t appl y coating s t o larg e part s suc ha s helicopter s an dships
. Thes e coatin g operation s hav e simila r issue s o f

larg e ai r flows (du e t o worke r

exposur e concerns ) an dlo w outie t HA Pemissio n concentrations
. Base do nthis , w e believ e tha t

i t i s technicall y feasibl e t o appl y 10 0 percen t

efficien t captur e system s t o large r

part s i nth e reinforce d plasti c composite s industry
. W e evaluate dth e applicabilit y o f th e 9 5 percen t

contro l leve l a s th e ne w sourc e floo r

fo r othe r operations
. Centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , an d SM C manufacturin g ar e simila r i n emission s characteristic s t o ope n molding
. Ther e ar e five facilitie s tha t hav e applie dhighl y efficien t add-o n control s t o thes e operations , wit h overal l contro l efficiencie s rangin g from 9 0 t o 9 5 percent . Fo r

thi s reason , w e chos e 9 5 percen t

contro l a s th e ne w sourc e MAC T floor

fo r thes e operatiori s a t facilitie s wit huncontrolle demission s o f a t leas t 10 0 tpy . W e als o considere dwhethe r th e ne w sourc e MAC T floor

fo r th e previousl y mentione doperation s shoul db e incorporatio no f

th e pollution

preventio nmeasure s tha t mak e u p th e existin g sourc e floors, combine dwit h9 5 percen t control
. Thi s approac hwoul d actuall y resul t

i nahighe r

overal l emission s reduction
. I naddition , incorporatin g th e pollutio npreventio n measure s woul dreduc e th e potentia l fo r worke r exposur e i nsituation s wher e processe s hav e t o b e enclose dt o mee t th e 9 5 percen t

contro l requirement
. However , w e determine dtha t selectin g incorporatio no f pollution

preventio ntechnique s ir i additio n t o th e 9 5 percen t contro l requiremen t

a s th e ne w sourc e floor

wa s no t appropriat e becaus e th e facilitie s tha t incorporat e 9 5 percen t control , whic hw e determine d represen t

th e bes t controlle dfacilities , d o no t als o incorporat e th e bes t pollutio npreventio ntechniques
. Therefore , combinin g th e pollution

preventio nrequirement s wit hth e 9 5 percen t contro l requirement s woul d actuall y resul t

i na noveral l contro l leve l tha t exceed s th e level s a t

th e bes t controlle dfacilities
. W e ar e requestin g commen t o n whethe r th e ne w sourc e floor

fo r facilitie s tha t

mus t mee t th e 9 5 percen t contro l requirement s shoul dals o incorporat e th e pollution-preventio n requirements
. W e als o reques t tha t commentor s provid e an y availabl e dat a o nworke r

exposur e tha t

woul dhel p u s quantify th e benefit s o f incorporatin g pollution-preventio nrequirement s wit h th e 9 5 percen t

contro l requirements
. W e ar e no t

proposin g 9 5 percen t contro l fo r

close dmolding , polyme r casting , equipmen t

cleaning , an dresi n storage , whic hhav e muc hlowe r emission s tha n th e othe r type s o f operations
. On e o f

th e facilitie s tha t

set s th e ne w sourc e floor

ha s aclose d moldin g operatio no n site
. Thi s operatio ni s no t

controlle dthroug hth e us e o f a nadd-o n contro l device
. W e attempte dt o identify othe r mean s o f emission s reduction s fo r thes e processes . Fo r

compression/injectio n molding , whic hi s atyp e o f close d molding , th e onl y identifie dmean s o f emissio nreductio nwa s th e wor k practic e o f

uncoverin g on e charg e a t a time
. Therefore , thi s wa s chose na s th e ne w sourc e MAC T floo r fo r compression/injectio nmolding
. Fo r polyme r castin g an dresi ntransfe r molding , w e wer e no t

abl e t o identify an y mean s o f

reduction , eithe r

add-o n "control s o r

proces s modification s suc h a s th e us e o f

lo w HA Presins
. Thus , th e ne w sourc e MAC T floo r fo r thes e source s i s n o emission s reduction
. Fo r equipmen t

cleaning , th e propose d ne w sourc e floor

i s base do n us e o f cleaner s wit hn o HAP
. Ofth e 43 3 facilitie s tha t

reporte dinformatio no n cleaning , 35 3 reporte dusin g n o cleanin g material s containin g HAP
. However , w e ar e no t regulatin g solvent s use dfo r cleanin g cure dresi n o r ge l coa t from applicatio nequipmen t becaus e w e kno w o f n o mean s o f

reducin g HA P emissions
. Cure dresi no r ge l coa t insid e agu ni s usuall y th e resul t o f operato r erro r o r a nequipmen t

failure
. T o clea n cure dresi nan dge l coat , a naggressiv e solven t i s needed , an dn o low-HA P alternative s ar e available
. Th e . equipmen t

i s usuall y soake di na covere dbucke t

resultin g i nlittl e evaporatio no f the
. solvent
. Th e amoun t o f solven t neede dpe r

yea r i s determine db y th e siz e o f th e facility , degre e o f operato r error , an dequipmen t failur e rates . Becaus e operato r erro r an d equipmen t

failur e ar e har dt o predict , w e coul ddetermin e n o basi s fo r a n annua l limi t

o f solven t usag e tha t

woul d b e achievabl e b y al l facilities
. Thes e propose dNESEHAP , therefore , allo w HAP-containin g solvent s onl y fo r cleanin g cure dresi n an dge l coa t from th e applicatio n equipment
. Ove r 25 0 facilitie s reporte dcoverin g storag e containers
. W e selecte dcoverin g storag e container s a s th e ne w sourc e MAC T floor

fo r storage . W e identifie d tw o facilitie s tha t

ven t th e storag e area s t o acontro l device ; however , w e determine dtha t

th e availabl e dat aar e insufficien t

t o quantif

y additiona l emission s reduction s tha t woul dresul t fromcontrollin g storag e tank s an d container s b y 9 5 percen t versu s jus t coverin g th e storag e tank s an d containers
. W e calculate dseparat e floors fo r facilitie s wit hles s tha n10 0 tp y o f emission s fromope n molding , centrifuga l castin g continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dBM C manufacturing/mixing
. Thoug hther e ar e facilitie s wit hemission s belo w 10 0 tp y tha t hav e add-o n controls , dat awer e no t availabl e t o substantiat e thei r leve l o f control
. Therefore , w e coul dno t stat e tha t the y achieve daleve l o f contro l abov e tha t

achieve db y th e pollution

preventio ntechniques , an dthus , mee t th e definitio no f

bes t controlle d facilities
. Also , smaller-emittin g facilitie s ten dt o operat e wit hfewe r shift s tha n large r

ones . Th e mor e frequent startup s an dshutdown s coul d ten dt o mak e i t

mor e difficul t

t o maintai n an doperat e add-o n control s compare dt o larger-emittin g facilities
. Fo r thes e reasons , th e floor fo r ne w source s wit hles s tha n10 0 tp y o f emission s i s base do n pollution

preventio ntechniques
. Fo r thes e smaller-emittin g facilities , w e ar e proposin g t o se t th e ne w sourc e MAC T floor

a t th e sam e leve l as . th e existin g sourc e MAC T floor. Thi s approac hwa s recommende db y th e SBA RPanel
. W e believ e th e existin g sourc e MAC T floo r

represent s th e greates t degre e o f

emission s reductio n tha t i s achievabl e fo r

smal l facilitie s unde r al l circumstances
. Fo r ne w sources , th e CA A require s th e MAC T floor t o b e base do n th e HA Pemission s contro l achieve di n practic e b y th e bes t controlle dsimila r

source , a s determine d b y th e Administrator
. Th e reinforce d plasti c composite s industr y i s extraordinaril y diverse
. Th e product sP.1 2

Federa l Registe r/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s 

### 4033 3 produced , eve ni n di e sam e operation , ' ca ninclud e skylights , bathtubs , an d• • part s fo r automobiles
. Give nthi s diversity , i t

i s difficul t

t o identify th e "bes t controlled " source . Product s manufacture db y thi s industr y generall y mus t mee t certai nminima l strengt han d durabilit y requirements
. Th e HA P conten t o f th e resi ni s afacto r

i n meetin g suc hrequirements
. Us e o f a resi nwit hagive nHA Pconten t ma y b e th e mos t stringen t

leve l o f contro l possibl e fo r

aparticula r

process , whil e i t ma y b e possibl e t o us e alower-HA P resi ni nadifferen t

proces s withou t jeopardizin g th e strengt ho r durabilit y o f th e product
. Whil e som e facilitie s ar e usin g lower

HA Pmaterial s an dteclinique s tha n represente db y th e existin g sourc e MAC T floor, w e d o no t believ e tha t thes e example s ar e universall y applicabl e t o al l ne w reinforce dplasti c composite s manufacturers
. W e hav e n o dat at o precisel y defin e th e particula r combinatio no f

requirement s wher e thes e lower-emittin g option s ca nb e use dan dstil l maintai nth e minimu m require dstrengt han ddurabilit y requirement s o f

thes e products
. Consequently , w e hav e se t th e propose d floor a t th e mos t

stringen t

leve l tha t

w e hav e determine dal l source s emittin g les s dia n 10 0 tp y ca nachieve
. W e di dno t

findtha t

th e quantit y o f HA Pemission s fromth e sourc e ha dan y effec t o nit s abilit y t o incorporat e pollution-preventio ntechnology , o r o n th e effectivenes s o f

thes e technologies
. Fo r tha t reason , w e di dno t

subdivid e th e dat afo r

existin g source s wher e th e floor s ar e base dmainl y o npollutio n prevention
. Durin g th e SBA RPane l discussions , man y o f th e smal l entit y representative s expresse dconcer n regardin g th e affordabilit y an dtechnica l feasibilit y o f add-o ncontrols , an dcommente dtha t the y ma y b e abl e t o achiev e simila r HA P reduction s usin g pollution-preventio n measures , whic hten dt o b e less

expensive
. Fo r

example , i f

afacilit y coul dreduc e it s emission s b y 5 0 percen t eac hyea r

fo r 3 year s usin g th e pollution-preventio nalternative , i t may . b e abl e t o achiev e reduction s simila r t o therma l oxidatio n(nearl y 9 0 percen t versu s 9 5 percent)
. Th e pane l recommende dtha t

EP A explor e wit h industr y th e possibilit y o f amor e stringen t pollution-preventio noptio na s a nalternativ e t o add-o n controls
. Th e pane l believe dtha t

thi s optio nshoul d b e mor e stringen t

tha n th e pollution

preventio ntechnolog y presen t i nth e curren t existin g sourc e MAC T floors. W e discusse dwit hindustr y th e possibilit y o f

apollution-preventio n contro l optio ni nlie u o f add-o n controls
. W e wer e unabl e t o develo p a n

optio ntha t

w e believ e meet s th e statutor y requirement s o f MACT
. However , w e ar e solicitin g commen t o n apossibl e pollution-preventio n alternativ e t o th e 9 5 percen t EHA P reductio nrequirement
. Th e specifi c informatio n w e ar e seekin g i s th e maximu mleve l o f

contro l tha t

ca nb e achieve db y pollutio nprevention , an d th e tim e necessar y t o incorporat e pollution-preventio ntechniques
. Th e pollution-preventio ntechnique s o f whic hw e ar e awar e includ e lo w HA P resin s an dge l coats , nonatomize dresi n an dge l coa t

applications , vapo r suppresse dresins , vacuu mbagging , accelerate dresi n curing , an dconversio n o f ope n moldin g processe s t o close d molding
. W e ar e solicitin g informatio n o nothe r pollution-preventio n technique s o f

whic hw e ar e no t

aware , an dinformatio n o n th e maximu mleve l o f emission s reduction s achievabl e b y thes e techniques
. Th e genera l concep t

o f a n alternativ e woul db e afacilit y tha t elect s t o us e thi s optio nt o submi t

notificatio nt o th e appropriat e permittin g authorit y o f thei r intent
. Th e facilit y woul dthe n hav e t o submi t apla nt o mee t

specifi c emission s reduction s throug hpollutio n prevention
. Th e pla nwoul doutiin e th e technique s the y inten dt o use , di e researc han dtestin g required , an da schedul e wit hannua l milestone s fo r achievin g th e goal
. I nth e nex t

step , th e facilit y woul d calculat e a noveral l emissio n facto r fo r al l processe s a t

th e facilit y tha t

ar e require dt o mee t

th e 9 5 percen t emissio n reduction
. Onc e afacilit y ha s determine dabas e yea r emissio nfactor , the y woul db e require dt o incorporat e th e pollution

preventio ntechnique s outline di nth e pla nan dmak e annua l report s o f progress . If

afacilit y wa s unabl e t o mee t a ninteri mmilestone , the y woul db e require dt o provid e a nupdate dpla n withi naspecifie dtime. W e ar e als o solicitin g commen t o n determinatio no f

abas e yea r

an d baselin e emissio n factor , an dreportin g requirements
. G. Did We Consider

Options More
. Stringent Than the MACT

Floor? Fo r existin g sources , a nabove-the- : floor contro l leve l wa s evaluate dwhic h wa s base do n th e ne w sourc e floo r fo r source s wit hemission s o f 10 0 tp y o r more . Thi s above-the-floo r contro l leve l woul drequir e 9 5 percen t contro l o f HA Pemission s fro mal l ope nmolding , centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dresi n mixing/BM C manufacturing
. W e the nlooke da t severa l options
. Thes e wer e selectin g th e floor leve l o f contro l a s MAC T fo r

al l facilities , selectin g th e above-the-floo r leve l a s MAC T fo r

al l facilities , o r

choosin g a n alternativ e wher e facilitie s a t o r abov e a certai n HA Pemission s quantit y woul d mee t th e above-the-floo r

level , an dth e res t woul dmee t

th e floor
. I n lookin g a t thi s thir daltemative , w e als o evaluate d differen t HA Pemissio n thresholds
. Th e optio no f

havin g al l facilitie s mee t th e above-the-floo r

leve l o f contro l ha da nincrementa l cos t o f $4,30 0 pe r additiona l to n o f

HA Pemissio n reduction
. Th e economi c analysi s fo r thi s optio n indicate dtha t 12 6 smal l businesse s woul db e impacte da t aleve l o f 3 percen t

o f sale s o r more , an dther e wer e 9 0 projecte dclosure s o f smal l businesses
. Becaus e of th e impact s o n smal l businesses , w e believ e tha t th e benefi t o f controllin g al l existin g source s t o thi s leve l i s no t commensurat e wit hth e economi c impacts
. Therefore , w e ar e no t proposin g thi s alternativ e a s MACT
. W e the nlooke da t

acombinatio n o f th e MAC T floor

fo r facilitie s belo w a specifie dHA Pemission s quantit y base d o n actua l emission s prio r t o an y add-o n controls , an dth e above-the-floo r leve l o f contro l fo r

larger-emittin g facilities
. W e als o examine dth e impact s fromth e standpoin t

o f smal l businesse s an dtiieir abilit y t o obtai nth e capita l t o purchas e pollutio n contro l equipment
. W e believ e tha t th e capita l cost s o f

th e above-the

floor optio nfo r

mos t smal l businesse s woul db e prohibitiv e becaus e the y d o no t hav e th e sam e acces s t o capita l a s larg e businesses
. Th e availabl e dat a indicat e tha t

a t athreshol do f

25 0 tpy , non e ofth e existin g smal l businesse s i n th e dat abas e woul db e impacte d significanti y b y th e above-the-floo r contro l level
. Fo r

thi s reason , w e determine dMAC T fo r

smal l businesse s t o b e th e floor

fo r facilitie s tha t

emi t les s tha n25 0 tp y o f

HAP , an dth e above-the

floo r contro l leve l fo r

facilitie s tha t

emi t 25 0 tp y o r

more . Fo r

larg e businesses , w e determine dMAC T t o b e th e floo r fo r facilitie s tha t

emi t les s tha n 10 0 tp y o f HAP , an dth e above-the-floo r contro l leve l fo r facilitie s tha t

emi t 10 0 tp y o r mor e o f HAP
. Th e incorporatio n o f th e 25 0 tp y threshol dfo r

smal l businesse s wa s on e o f

th e recommendation s o f th e SBA RPanel , an dth e economi c impact s o f th e selecte doptio n ar e reasonable
. Industr y representative s independentl y develope dcost s fo r add

o ncontrol s an dsubmitte dthe mt o th e Agency
. Thei r

analysi s i s i n th e docke t fo r thi s propose drulemaking
. Th e SBA R Pane l recommende dtha t w e reconside r ou r estimate s o f

cost s fo r add-o n control s i nligh t

o f tha t study
. Th eP.1 3


### 4033 4 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRules

industr y cos t

estimate s ar e at

leas t thre e time s highe r

tha nou r cost.estimates
. Th e major

reaso nfo r thes e difference s i ncos t are th e desig nassumption s fo r th e permanen t

tota l enclosure s an dth e estimate dai r

flows
. Ou r

cos t estimate s assum e aninle t

concentratio no

f 10 0 part s pe r millio nb y volum e (ppmv)
. Th e industr y stud y assume s lowe r concentration s tha t

vary basedo nth e specifi c facility
. However , availabl e tes t dat afo r measure dconcentration s i nth e exhaus t stream s fo

r reinforce dplasti c composite s facilitie s rang e from6 1 t o 24 9 ppmv , wit ha naverag e concentratio n o

f 12 0 an damedia no

f 82
. Base do nthis , w e believ e ou r 10 0 

### ppm v estimat e i s stil l reasonable , an d w e hav e decide dno t

t o revis e ou r

cos t analysi s at

thi s time
. W

e wil l revie w th e industry' s cos t

analysi s i nmor e dept h followin g proposal , an dmak e an y appropriat e change s base do nou r revie w an do n comment s w e receive
. We ar e solicitin g commen t o nth e cos t an dfeasibility o

f add-o ncontrols , dat a o ndesig nan doperatio no f permanen t tota l enclosure s fromthi s or similar industries , an ddat ao ntypica l exhaus t EHA Pconcentration s an dai r

flow s fo r reinforce dplasti c composit e facilities
. We di dno t

identif y a nabove-the-floo r optio nfo r th e followin g operations : close dmolding , polyme r

casting , an d equipmen t

cleaning
. We wer e abl e t o findn o example s wher e an y close d moldin g proces s wa s controlle dusin g add-o ncontrols
. Therefore , w e believ e i t i s no t technicall y an deconomicall y feasibl e t o us e add-o ncontrol s fo r close dmoldin g processes . We d o no t believ e i t i s technicall y feasibl e t o us e add-o n control s fo

r equipmen t

cleanin g operations
. I n an y case , applicatio no f th e floor leve l o f contro l w e ar e proposin g woul deliminat e HAP

containin g cleaners , excep t fo r case s wher e cure dresi nha s t o b e remove d fromapplicatio nequipment
. Thi s floor leve l o f contro l woul dachiev e clos e t o 10 0 percen t

HA Pemission s reductions
. Fo r ne w sources , w e examine dan above-the-floo r

optio no f requirin g al l source s t o mee t

th e 9 5 percen t

contro l requiremen t

fo r ope nmolding , centrifugal casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dresi nmixing/BM C manufacturing
. W

e determine dthat , eve n i f w e coul dresolv e th e issue s surroundin g th e performanc e o f add-o n contro l device s at

th e smaller-emittin g sources , th e incrementa l cos t woul db e $15,00 0 pe r

to no f additiona l HA

P emission s reduction
. Fo r

thi s reason , w e chos e th e floor

leve l o f contro l a s MACT fo r ne w sources . We als o considere da neve n mor e stringen t above-the-floo r

contro l leve l fo

r bothexistin g an dne w sources . Thi s contro l leve l woul drequir e facilitie s t o us e add-o ncontrol s t o mee t a9 5 percen t HAPemissio nreduction , an dals o requir e the mt o incorporat e pollution

preventio ntechnique s suc ha s th e us e o f lo w HA Presin s an dgel coats , an d nonatomize dresi napplicatio n techniques
. A s previousl y discussed , th e benefit s o

f tiiis apprbac hwoul db e tha t b y incorporatin g th e pollution

preventio nmeasure s i nadditio nt o th e add-o ncontrol , th e overal l HAP emission s reductio nwoul db e increased
. I n addition , th e potentia l fo r worke r exposur e i nthes e situation s woul db e reduced
. However , w e 

### determinedtha

t thi s control level woul d resul t i napproximatel y a2 percen t incrementa l HAPemission s reductio n compare dt o th e above-the-floo r contro l leve l basedo na9 5 percen t emission s reductio nalone
. Th e incrementa l cos t o f acontro l leve l tha t

combine s 9 5 percen t HAPemission s reduction s an d pollution-preventio nmeasure s woul d b e $36,90 0 pe r

to no f additiona l HAP emission s reduction
. Thoug hther e may b e worke r exposur e benefits , w e di dno t includ e thi s above-the-floo r contro l leve l i nthi s propose drule
. Thi s possibilit y i s stil l unde r

consideration , an dw e ar e requestin g comment . We als o reques t

tha t commentor s provid e an y availabl e dat ao nworke r exposur e tha t woul dallo w u s t o quantif y th e additiona l worke r

exposur e benefit s o

f incorporatin g pollution-preventio n requirement s wit hth e 9 5 percen t contro l requirements
. We di dno t

identif y a nabove-the-floo r optio n fo r ne w source s fo

r th e followin g operations : Close dmolding , polyme r casting , an dequipmen t

cleanin g fo

r th e sam e reason s a s discusse dabov e fo r existin g sources . We als o examine da nabove-the-floo r contro l optio nfo

r existin g source s based o npollutio n prevention
. A s wa s th e cas e wit hth e ne w sourc e MACT floor, w e ar e unabl e at

thi s tim e t o develo p a n alternativ e tha t

w e believ e meet s th e statutor y requirement s o

f MACT
. However , w e ar e specificall y solicitin g comment s o npollution-preventio n technique s tha t

coul db e use di nlie u o

f th e above-the-floo r

alternativ e a s wer e discusse di nth e sectio no nne w sourc e floors
. I nadditio nt o th e previou s discussion , w e als o evaluate dnon-ai r qualit y environmenta l impact s o f thes e above-the-floor s options
. Thes e impact s ar e discusse di nsectio nIV , Summar y o f Environmental , Energy , an dEconomi c Impacts
. H. Why Are Some Reinforced Plastic Composites Production Operations Not Subject to These Proposed

NESHAP? Thes e propose dNESHA

Pwoul dno t regulat e mol dsealin g an dreleas e agents an dmol dstrippin g an dcleanin g solvent s becaus e w e wer e unabl e t o se t MACT floor s or

determin e MACT fo

r thes e operations
. I nbothcases , th e informatio nan ddat aavailabl e t o u s sugges t tha t mol dmaintenanc e practices , par t

shap e an dsize , an d productio nschedule s determin e emission s mor e tha nth e HAPcontent.o f thes e materials
. We d o no t hav e sufficien t dat at o identif

y an dprescrib e wor k practice s t o reduc e emission s from dies e operations
. Therefore , thes e propose dNESHA

Pd o no t requir e emission s reduction s fo

r thes e materials
. Fo r mol dstrippin g an dcleanin g solvents , th e amoun t

o f HA Puse dpe r uni t o f mol dsurfac e are aapplie d depend s o nfacility-specifi c mol d maintenanc e practice s an dproductio n requirements
. Thes e may includ e mol d cycl e time , ho w ofte nth e mol di s used , an dwhethe r

th e mol di s store dindoor s or outdoors
. Th e siz e o

f th e par t may als o influenc e mol dmaintenance
. We d o no t hav e sufficien t

dat at o identif

y thos e difference s i nproductio n requirement s or

wor k practice s tha t determin e mol dcleanin g solven t usage . Therefore , w e canno t

identify , aMACT floor or MACT
. /
. How Did

We Select

the Proposed Compliance Dates for

Existing and

New Sources? Th e CA A instruct s EP

A t o establis ha complianc e dat e or

date s fo r existin g source s tha t

wil l provid e fo

r complianc e "a s expeditiousl y a s practicable , bu t i n n o even t late r tha n3 year s afte

r th e effectiv e date. " Fo r

existin g sources , w e ar e proposin g acomplianc e dat e 3 year s from[DAT

EO FPUBLICATIONO FTH E FINA LRUL EI N TH EFederal Register] . Existin g source s complyin g wit hth e poin t valu e limits , whic hi s apollution

preventio napproach , wil l nee dt o mak e change s i napplicatio nequipmen t an d ra w materials
. We believ e thes e source s nee dth e full 3-yea

r perio dprovide db y th e CA A i norde r

t o evaluat e th e effect o f thes e change s o nthei r

productio n processes , particularl y becaus e the y may nee dt o try ou t

different resins
. I n addition , w e believ e tha t

providin g th e maximu mamoun t

o f allowabl e tim e wil l provid e mor e source s th e opportunit y t o chang e thei r ra w material s an dproductio ntechnique s s o • tha t eac hresi n an dge l coat

ca nmee t th e MACT specifi c t o eac hproces s typ e rathe r tha naveragin g th e HAPconten tP. M

Federa l Registe r/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4033 5

o f resin s acros s th e source , thereb y reducin g th e amoun t

o f record s an dn paperwor k

neede dt o demonstrat e initia l an dcontinuou s compliance
. W e ar e als o proposin g a3-yea r complianc e dat e fo r

existin g source s tha t mus t us e add-o ncontrols
. W e believ e th e ful l 3 year s provide db y th e CA A i s necessar y fo r

thes e source s a s wel l t o allo w sufficien t tim e fo r the mt o design , purchase , install , an dwor k ou t operationa l problem s tha t occu r i n tryin g t o star t

u p ane w contro l device
. I naddition , i f

a nexistin g source' s emission s excee don e o f th e threshold s i nth e propose drul e tha t require s a n add-o ncontro l devic e t o comply , th e 3

- yea r perio dwoul dprovid e sufficien t tim e t o evaluat e whethe r ther e ar e pollution-preventio napproache s tha t woul dge t

the mbelo w th e threshold
. W e encourag e th e us e o f

pollution

preventio na s acontro l approach , an d- pollutio npreventio ncoul db e a significan t

cos t saving s ove r

add-o n control s fo r

thes e sources . Th e CA A instruct s EP A t o establis h complianc e date s fo r

ne w source s tha t wil l provid e fo r

complianeeupo nstar t up , o r th e effectiv e dat e ofth e final rule , whicheve r

i s later
. Thes e ar e th e date s w e ar e proposin g i n thi s propose drule
. Ne w an dexistin g source s tha t compl y b y meetin g poin t

value s o n a12-mont h rollin g averag e mus t

initiat e collectio n o f thes e dat ao nth e complianc e date
. Ne w an dexistin g source s tha t compl y usin g add-o ncontro l device s mus t conduc t th e require dperformanc e testin g withi nth e 180-da y tim e perio d a s specifie di nth e Genera l Provision s t o par t 63
. W e ar e als o proposin g t o provid e source s 3 year s t o compl y fromthe-tim e thei r HA Pemission s reac ho r excee dth e applicabilit y threshold s requirin g th e installatio no f

add-o ncontrols , i f

thes e HA Pemission s increas e afte r thei r initia l complianc e date
. W e ar e providin g thi s complianc e time fo r source s unde r

thes e circumstance s because , a s explaine dpreviously , w e believ e thi s i s th e necessar y amoun t o f tim e t o ge t

thes e contro l device s installe dan doperational
. /
. How Did

We Select

the Form of

These Proposed NESHAP? W e decide dt o offer

severa l form s fo r complyin g wit hth e propose dNESHAP
. Th e purpos e o f

multipl e form s i s t o provid e th e flexibility t o compl y i nth e mos t cost-effectiv e an defficien t manner . W e considere dth e followin g factor s i n selectin g th e for mo f

th e propose d NESHAP:
. • Th e for mshoul dallo w fo r multipl e complianc e technique s fo r th e variou s . type s o f facilitie s i nth e industry
. • Th e for mshoul dsimplif y complianc e an densur e tha t tiie cos t o f complianc e i s no t

excessive
. • Th e for mshoul db e enforceable
. Th e for mo f

thes e propose dNESHA P i s base do nacombinatio n o f emissio n limit s (poin t

value s o r

percen t reduction) , equipmen t

standards , an d wor k practic e standards
. 1
. Emissio nLimit s Base do n Poin t Value s v Thes e propose dNESHA Pfo r open . moldin g operation s an dcentrifuga l castin g operation s ar e base do npoin t value s whic har e i n unit s o f pound s o f HA Ppe r to n o f resi nused
. Th e poin t valu e developmen t

ha s bee n previousl y described
. Thi s for mwa s chose nove r a nabsolut e emissio nlimi t becaus e i t accuratel y determine s th e amoun t o f .pollution-preventio n contro l asourc e ha s incorporate di n it s process , bu t doe s no t requir e afacilit y t o perfor m emissio n testing
. Thi s for mals o allow s fo r averagin g acros s ope n moldin g processe s o r

acros s centrifuga l castin g processes . Thi s mean s tha t asourc e ha s th e optio n t o over-contro l som e operations , under-contro l other s (relativ e t o th e limi t

fo r tha t individua l process) , bu t

stil l mee t

th e overal l limi t fo r suc hoperation s combined
. Thi s allow s asourc e t o hav e additiona l flexibility i nmeetin g th e propose d standards
. Th e emissio n limit s fo r ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g fo r ne w source s ar e base dori apercen t

reductio nusin g add-o ncontrols
. However , w e hav e provide da n alternativ e standar dfo r ne w source s als o base do n poin t values
. Thes e poin t

value s wer e determine db y applyin g th e require dpercen t reductio n requiremen t

t o th e existin g sourc e MAC T floors. Th e ne w sourc e floor i s base do n acontro l efficiency , an dth e facilitie s tha t

hav e thes e control s d o no t hav e example s o f

ever y possibl e typ e o f ope nmoldin g o r

centrifuga l castin g process . Therefore , w e wer e no t abl e t o us e th e best-controlle dsource s t o directl y determin e apoin t valu e tha t

i s equivalen t

t o th e 9 5 percen t

emission s reduction s requiremen t fo r al l operations
. Fo r

operation s wher e w e coul ddirectl y determin e apoin t valu e equivalent , th e approac ho f usin g existin g sourc e floors an dapplyin g 9 5 percen t contro l i s slightl y mor e stringent
. Therefore , w e believ e applyin g thi s approac ht o al l ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g operation s wil l produc e alimi t tha t i s n o les s stringent , whil e providin g opportunitie s fo r

facilitie s t o incorporat e pollutio npreventio nint o thei r process , mee t

apercen t

reductio n requiremen t les s tha n 9 5 percent , bu t stil l mee t

th e ne w sourc e floor. 2
. Emissio n Limit s Base do n Percen t Reductio n Th e for mo f

th e standard s fo r

ne w ope nmolding , centrifuga l casting , SM C manufacturing , an dresin/mixing/BM C manufacturing , an dth e standard s fo r ne w an dexistin g source s fo r pultrusio n an dSM C manufacturin g ar e base do na percen t reduction
. Thes e standard s wer e al l develope dfromfacilitie s usin g add

o ncontrols
. I t

i s possibl e t o desig na contro l devic e t o mee t

aspecifie d percen t reduction
. Bu t

base do n th e dat a available , i t

wa s no t possibl e t o determin e a nuncontrolle demissio n facto r fo r ope nmolding , centrifuga l casting , SM C manufacturing , an d mixing/BM C manufacturin g tha t wa s generall y applicable
. Therefore , w e coul dno t

develo p astandar dbase do n a nemissio n factor
. Fo r continuou s lamination/casting , w e wer e abl e t o develo p a n absolut e emissio n limi t base do n th e facilitie s tha t se t th e floor. Thes e absolut e emissio nlimit s ar e presente da s alternative s t o th e percen t reductio nlimits
. I n th e cas e o f pultrusio noperations , ther e ar e alternativ e standard s base do nwet-are a enclosure s o r

direc t di e injection
. Emissio n testin g ha s determine dtha t usin g thi s equipmen t

a s specifie di nth e propose drul e wil l achiev e th e percen t reduction s specifie di n th e NESHAP
. 3
. Emissio n Limit s Base do n Equipment/Wor k

Practic e Standard s Sectio n 112(h ) ofth e CA A state s tha t " * * * i f

i t i s no t feasibl e i n th e judgemen t

o f th e Administrato r

t o prescrib e o r

enforc e a nemissio n standar dfo r

contro l o f

ahazardou s ai r pollutan t o r pollutants , th e Administrato r

may , i nlie u thereof , promulgat e adesign , equipment , wor k practice , o r

operationa l standard , o r combinatio nthereo f

* * * " Sectio n 112(h)(2 ) furthe r

define s th e phras e "no t feasibl e t o prescrib e o r enforc e a n emissio nstandard " a s an y situatio n i n which" * * * ahazardou s ai r pollutan t o r pollutant s canno t

b e emitte dthroug h aconveyanc e designe dan dconstructe d t o emi t o r captur e suc hpollutant , * * * o r th e applicatio n o f

measuremen t methodolog y t o aparticula r clas s o f source s i s no t

practicabl e du e t o technologica l an deconomi c limitations. " Th e emissio nlimit s fo r equipmen t cleanin g an dstorag e a t ne w an dexistin g source s ar e base do n wor k practic e an d equipmen t

standards
. Th e reaso n fo r choosin g wor k

practic e an dequipmen t standard s fo r

storag e i s tha t

storag e area s ma y b e locate doutsid e th e res t o f

### 4033 6 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No.
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRules, , th e productio narea , an di nsom e cases , ma y b e locate doutsid e th e building
. W e d o no t believ e i t

woul db e practicabl e du e t o economi c limitation s t o tes t storag e areas , an dw e d o no t hav e sufficien t dat at o calculat e a nemissio n limi t fo r th e require dwor k

practice
. Th e standar dfo r

existin g pultrusio n facilitie s i s base do nth e equipmen t standar dcombine dwit hawor k practice
. W e hav e propose dth e (Standar da s apercen t

reductio nt o allo w th e us e o f

add-o ncontrols
. However , w e d o no t believ e i t

woul db e technologicall y o r

economicall y feasibl e t o actuall y tes t

facilitie s tha t

choos e t o us e awet-are aenclosur e o r direc t di e injection
. Th e limit s fo r

SM C an dresi n mixing / BM C a t existin g facilitie s ar e als o base d o nwor k practice s o r

equipmen t standards
. W e hav e n o dat at o determin e aspecifi c percen t reductio n t o th e wor k

practice s fo r

thes e operations
. Therefore , wecoul dno t se t aspecifi c emissio nlimit
. Cleanin g operation s ma y tak e plac e outsid e th e regula r

productio narea . I t woul dno t

b e technologicall y o r economicall y practicabl e t o perfor m emissio ntestin g fo r

cleanin g operations
. 4
. Selectio no f

Averagin g Tim e fo r Demonstratin g Complianc e A s areinforce dplasti c composite s manufacturer , w e ar e proposin g tha t yo u coul dsho w complianc e wit hth e propose dNESHA Po na12-month , rolling-averag e basis
. A 12-mont h

. rollin g averag e i s determine da t th e en d ofeac hmonth-b y calculatin g aweighte d averag e actua l poin t

valu e base do n tha t month' s resi nan dge l coa t use , an da weighte daverag e floor valu e base do n tha t month' s resi nan dge l coa t use . Th e floor mus t als o b e calculate dbecaus e th e floors fo r

differen t operation s ar e no t th e same , an dth e weighte daverag e floor ma y chang e base do nth e relativ e amount s o f

resi nuse di ndifferen t operations
. Yo u woul dthe n su mth e curren t month' s weighte daverage s (floo r an dactual ) wit hth e monthl y average s fo r

eac hofth e previou s 1 1 months , divid e th e resultin g sum s b y 12 , an dcompar e th e tw o results
. I f th e actua l 12-mont hweighte daverag e poin t valu e i s les s tha no r

equa l t o th e floo r 12-mont hweighte daverag e poin t value , yo u ar e i n compliance
. W e believ e a12-mont haveragin g time ' provide s abalanc e betwee noperatin g flexibility an denforceabilit y o f th e propose dstandards
. Th e 12-mont h perio di s sufficientl y lon g s o tha t yo u ca nidentify potentia l complianc e problem s an dchang e you r operation s i n tim e t o maintai ncompliance
. Th e rolling-averag e aspec t

provide s a n enforceabl e emissio n limi t 1 2 time s pe r year . Man y reinforce dplastiacomposite s manufacturer s alread y trac k materia l usag e monthl y t o compl y wit hStat e regulation s an dpermitTequirements , s o we'believ e monthl y trackin g i s consistentwit hcurren t practice
. Trackin g o na . mor e frequent basis , woul db e unnecessaril y burdensome.fo r thi s particula r

industry
. Reinforce d plasti c composite s manufacturer s nee da 12-mont hrolling-averag e perio dt o respon dt o both * short-ter mvariation s i n HA Pconten t

tha t ar e inheren t

i nal l chemica l products , an dt o accoun t fo r short-ter mneed s fo r

higher-HA P

. material s du e t o variation s i n produc t mix
. I norde r t o calculat e a12-mont h rollin g average , facilitie s mus t hav e 1 2 month s o f

data
. Fo r

thi s reason , w e ar e proposin g t o allo w facilitie s tha t elec t t o us e a12-mont hrollin g averag e t o demonstrat e complianc e 1 2 month s an d 3 0 day s afte r

th e complianc e date
. Thi s

. include s th e tim e t o generate . 1 2 month s o f dat at o determin e th e averag e plu s 3 0 day s t o perfor mth e necessar y calculation s an dgenerat e th e complianc e report . If

w e wer e t o establis hademonstratio n dat e prio r t o this , a s apractica l matter , facilitie s woul dhav e t o actuall y achiev e complianc e prio r

t o th e complianc e date
. Fo r reason s previously-discussed , w e believ e i t

i s reasonabl e an d appropriat e t o giv e facilitie s th e maximu mtim e allowe db y the
. CA A t o comply
. K. How Did

We Select

the Test Methods for Determining Compliance With the Proposed NESHAP? Th e propose dNESHAP
. hav e severa l option s fo r

achievin g compliance
. Fo r ope nmoldin g an dcentrifuga l casting , :thi s include s meetin g aspecified.poin t valu e fo r existin g sources , o r

apercen t •reductio n o r

poin t valu e fo r

ne w sources . Fo r

mos t othe r processes , yo u achiev e complianc e b y usin g a n enclosur e an dadd-o ncontro l devic e t o mee t apercen t

reductio n requiremen t o r a nabsolut e emissio n limit
. I n orde r t o calculat e apointvalue , unde r thi s propose drule , yoi i mus t determin e th e HA Pconten t o f th e ra w material
. Th e metho dt o determin e materia l HA Pconten t

i s th e us e of

. th e Materia l Safet y Dat aSheet s (MSDS ) o r -.. othe r produc t specificatio nsheets ' provide db y th e materia l manufacturer
. W e chos e no t

t o propos e requirin g testing ! ofth e material
. Th e dat ause dt o develo p th e standard s wer e mainl y base do n MSDS ; therefore , w e believ e i t i s reasonabl e tha t

MSDS-b e use dt o determin e compliance
. Unde r th e propose dNESHAP , i f yo u chos e t o us e a n enclosur e an dadd-o n contro l device , yo u woul dhav e t o determin e th e captur e efficienc y ofth e enclosur e an dmeasur e th e HA Pfrom th e contro l device
. T o determin e th e captur e efficienc y o f

tiiKenclosure, yo u woul dus e EP A Metho d20 4 (Criteri afo r an dVerificatio n o f

Permanen t

o r Temporar y Tota l Enclosure)
. If th e enclosur e meet s th e criteri ai nEP A Metho d20 4 fo r

apermanen t

tota l enclosure , the n yo u coul dassum e tha t it s captur e efficienc y i s 10 0 percent . If th e enclosur e i s no t

atota l enclosure , the nyo u woul dbuild * atota l temporar y enclosur e aroun di t

tha t meet s th e definitio n o f

atota l temporar y enclosur e i nEP A Metho d204.Yo u woul dthe n hav e t o measureemission s frombot h th e contro l devic e an dth e tota l temporar y enclosur e an dus e th e combine demission s t o determin e compliance
. T o measure*HAP,-yo u woul db e abl e t o us e eithe r

EP A Metho d1 8 (Measuremen t

o f Gaseou s Organi c Compoun dEmission s b y Ga s Chromatography ) t o measur e th e su mo f individua l specie s o f

HAP , o r EP A Metho d25 A (Determinatio n o f Tota l

. Gaseou s Organi c Matte r Concentratio n Usin g aFlam e Ionizatio nAnalyzer ) fo r tota l hydrocarbon s (THC ) a s asurrogat e fo r tota l HAP
. Th e EP A Metho d25 A woul dallo w yo u th e flexibility t o us e a simple r metho dtha nEP A Metho d1 8 whic hdoe s no t

speciat e HA Pi n case s wher e measurin g TH C i s sufficien t t o demonstrat e compliance
. Yo u coul d measur e TH C a s asurrogat e fo r tota l HA Pi f mos t o f th e TH C emitte dfroma n enclosur e wer e HAP , suc ha s styren e an dMM A fro mresi n an dge l coa t operations
. Fo r

complianc e determinations , th e EP A wil l assum e tha t al l TH C measure dwit hEP A Metho d25 A ar e HAP
. W e hav e no t

include di nthi s propose drul e ates t

metho dfo r "determinin g th e effectivenes s o f vapo r suppresse dresins
. A draf t protoco l entitle d"Vapo r

Suppressan t Effectivenes s Tes t

Protocol, " date d Apri l 7,1999 , ha s bee ndevelope db y 'industr y an di s availabl e fo r revie w i n .th e docke t

fo r thi s propose drule
. Th e draf t protoco l i s insufficientl y detaile d •s fo r inclusio ni n .thi s propose drule
. W e ar e currentl y requestin g additiona l details-an dsolicitin g commen t o n th e tes t protoco l o r

a n alternat e tes t protocol
. L. How Did

We Determine the Proposed Monitoring and

Recordkeeping Requirements? Whic hmonitorin g an drecordkeepin g requirement s yo u woul dmee t depen dP.1 6

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No. * 149/Thursday , Augus t 2,. 200 1 /Propose dRule s 

### 4033 7

o nho w yo u choos'eito-compl y wit hJ thes e propose dNESHAP
. Fo r eac hani*"-

* complianc e option , th e propose d monitorin g an drecordkeepin g requirement s ar e th e minimu m necessar y t o determin e initia l an d ongoin g complianc e an dar e consisten t wit hth e Genera l Provision s (4 0 CFR ' par t 63 , subpar t

A)
. Thi s sectio ndescribe s ho w t o compl y wit hemissio nlimit s base do npoin t values , emissio naveragin g provisions , ' equipmen t

an dwor k

practic e standards , an dth e emissio nlimi t

fo r a nadd-o n contro l device
. 1
. Complianc e Wit hEmissio nLimit s Base do nPoin t

Value s Fo r al l operation s subjec t

t o HA P conten t limits , w e ar e proposin g fou r tasks : monito r

an drecor dth e EHA

P conten t ofth e materia l used , monito r an drecor dth e monthl y consumptio no f th e material , monito r

an drecor dwhic h operation s us e th e material , an drecor d th e computation s t o sho w tha t th e weighte daverag e poin t valu e ove r

th e pas t 1 2 month s meet s th e propose d standards
. Th e SBA RPane l recommende dtha t w e loo k fo r alternative s t o simplif y reportin g an drecordkeeping
. W e hav e identifie dtw o alternative s w e believ e simplif y th e reportin g an d recordkeepin g process . Th e first i s tha t a nowne r

an doperato r

ma y us e purchas e record s t o determin e monthl y consumption
. However , a nowne r an d operato r ca ntrac k

actua l materia l flow s t o eac hproces s i f

desired
. W e believ e thi s i s reasonabl e becaus e facilitie s hav e n o financial incentiv e t o kee p ' significan t

inventorie s o f

ra w materia l o nhand , an dw e hav e n o evidenc e tha t keepin g larg e amount s o f ra w materia l o nhan di s acommo npractice
. Therefore , purchase s an dactua l consumptio nshoul dtrac k fairl y closely
. W e ar e requirin g tha t

th e owne r

an d operato r hav e areasonabl e metho dt o estimat e th e amount s o f eac hresi nuse d b y aspecifi c operation
. Th e secon d alternativ e applie s wher e al l th e material s use di na noperatio nresul t i n apoin t valu e tha t

meet s th e emissio n limit , i nwhic hcase , a nowne r an d operato r onl y nee dt o recor dHA P conten t an dth e resultin g poin t valu e an dd o no t

nee dt o trac k

monthl y consumptio no f

eac hindividua l material
. 2
. Complianc e Wit hAveragin g Provision s T o compl y wit hth e averagin g provision s fo r

ope nmoldin g operation s an dcentrifuga l castin g operations , yo u mus t monito r an drecor dHA Pconten t a s wel l a s ho w us e o f

th e materia l i s spli t betwee ndifferen t

operations , an d yo u mus t

recor dth e computation s neede dt o sho w compliance
. Yo u mus t us e dies e dat aa s wel l a s th e MAC T mode l poin t

valu e equation s i nth e propose dNESHA Pt o calculat e th e poin t value s i ntiiat

operatio n fo r

th e pas t 1 2 months
. Complianc e i s the n determine drelativ e t o th e allowabl e weighte daverag e poin t valu e calculate d fo r thos e operation s fo r

th e pas t 12
. months
. Complianc e woul db e calculate dmonthly , an dmonthl y purchas e record s ma y b e use dt o determin e resi nan dge l coa t use . 3
. Complianc e Wit hEquipmen t an d Wor k Practic e Standard s Th e propose dNESHA Prequir e resi n an dge l coa t

mixin g container s t o b e fitte dwit hcover s tha t

hav e n o visibl e gaps . Yo u wil l b e require dt o inspec t containe r

cover s eac hmont ht o ensur e th e cover s ar e i n plac e an dproperl y maintained
. Yo u mus t

recor dth e result s o f th e inspections
. Th e inspection s shoul db e sufficien t

t o ensur e tha t

th e cover s ar e i n plac e an dproperl y maintained
. W e believ e monthl y inspection s ar e areasonabl e interva l becaus e th e natur e o f

failur e i nthes e piece s o f equipmen t

i s likel y du e t o wea r an dtea r an dno t asudde nfailure
. Longe r time period s betwee n inspections , however , woul dallo w a failur e t o g o to o lon g befor e bein g repaired
. Th e propose dNESHA Pfo r productio nresi n an dtoolin g resi n require s mos t

manufacturer s t o us e nonatomize dresi napplicatio nmethod s t o comply
. Thes e method s includ e flowcoater s an dpressure-fe dresi n rollers , amon g others
. W e coul didentify n o parameter s t o monito r whethe r thes e method s ar e bein g used
. Rather , complianc e throug hth e us e o f thes e method s woul db e determine ddurin g enforcemen t

inspections
. A s lon g a s flowcoaters, pressure-fe dresi n rollers , o r othe r simila r device s ar e installe d an doperate daccordin g t o manufacturer' s specifications , the y wil l compl y wit hth e requirement s t o us e nonatomize dresi n applicatio n methods
. 4
. Complianc e fo r

Source s Usin g Enclosure s an dAdd-O nContro l Device s Th e requirement s fo r

enclosure s an d add-o ncontro l device s i n th e propose d NESHA Par e consisten t wit hothe r

ai r qualit y regulation s tha t requir e captur e an dcontro l o f

emissions
. The y ar e th e minimu mneede dt o demonstrat e tha t th e captur e an dcontro l syste mi s operate dproperly
. W e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u mus t initiall y demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e emissio n limi t

b y demonstratin g tha t th e enclosur e i s atota l enclosur e o r b y als o measurin g th e fugitiv e emission s tha t escap e th e enclosure
. Yo u woul d als o nee dt o measur e th e efficienc y o f th e add-o ncontro l usin g EP A Metho d 25 A fo r TH C (a s asurrogat e fo r HAP ) o r EP A Metho d1 8 fo r

HAP
. Th e EP A Metho d1 8 measure s individua l HA P tha t yo u su mt o calculat e tota l HAP
. Afte r th e initia l complianc e test , w e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u mus t

monito r contro l devic e parameter s t o demonstrat e tha t

th e contro l devic e continue s t o b e operate da s i t wa s durin g th e initia l test . I n th e cas e o f therma l oxidizers , yo u woul dnee dt o monito r an drecor dcombustio n temperatur e ever y 1 5 minute s bot h durin g an dafte r

th e performanc e test . W e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u mus t calculat e th e averag e temperatur e achieve ddurin g th e test . Afte r th e test , yo u woul dnee dt o maintai n th e averag e temperatur e a t

o r abov e th e temperatur e achieve ddurin g th e performanc e test . Temperatur e monitor s an drecorder s ar e standar dfeature s o ntherma l oxidizers
. Fo r othe r device s w e ar e proposin g tha t yo u mus t

determin e appropriat e parameter s t o monito r

an dreceiv e ou r approva l t o us e thes e parameters . M. How Did

We Select

the Proposed Notification and

Reporting Requirements? W e believ e tha t

th e propose dnotice s an dreport s ar e th e minimu mneede dt o determin e i f

yo u ar e subjec t

t o th e propose dNESHA Pan dwhethe r yo u ar e i ncompliance
. W e ar e proposin g tha t yo u mus t

submi t a n initia l notificatio n statin g tha t

yo u ar e subjec t

t o th e propose dNESHAP
. Afte r th e complianc e dat e fo r

you r facility , yo u woul dnee dt o submi t

anotificatio no f you r complianc e status . Yo u woul dals o nee dt o submi t

semiannua l report s o f you r complianc e status . If

yo u hav e a n add-o ncontro l devic e an dyo u becom e ou t o f compliance , w e ar e proposin g tha t yo u mus t

submi t quarterl y report s o f you r complianc e statu s unti l w e approv e areques t

t o retur n t o semiannua l reporting
. If you r facilit y i s ane w source , w e ar e proposin g tha t

yo u hav e additiona l preconstructio n notificatio n requirements
. Yo u woul dals o hav e additiona l notificatio nan dreportin g requirement s i f

yo u us e a n add-o n contro l device , includin g notification s an dreport s fo r

th e contro l devic e performanc e test . Thes e propose d notificatio n an dreportin g requirement s ar e consisten t

wit hthos e specifie di n th e Genera l Provisions
. W e believ e tha t thes e requirement s ar e th e minimu m neede dfo r

u s t o determin e complianc e fo r source s wit hadd-o n contro l devices
.P.1 7



### 4033 8 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s Th e SS M pla nspecifie db y th e General Provision s wil l b e require donl y fo r source s usin g a nadd-o ncontro l devic e an dwil l appl y onl y t o th e add

o n contro l device
. Fo r

operation s no t usin g acontro l device , th e natur e ofth e material s an dequipmen t

use dt o compl y wit hth e propose dReinforce d Plasti c Composite s Productio nNESHA P

. i s suc htha t

malfunction s wil l no t

lea d t o exces s emissions
. N. What Are Some ofthe Areas Where We Are Specifically Soliciting Comments? Th e purpos e o

f thi s sectio ni s t o highligh t particula r

issue s o f concer nt o th e EP A or t o othe r parties
. W

e solici t comment s o n thes e issues , alon g wit h dat at o suppor t

th e comments . Th e propose drul e require s tha t certai n ne w an dexistin g source s contro l HAPemission s b y 9 5 percent . I norde r t o mee t thi s requirement , facilitie s wil l likel y hav e t o captur e 10 0 percen t o f thei r emission s fromth e affecte d processe s an drout e thes e emission s t o a n add-o ncontro l device
. We ar e solicitin g dat ao nth e technica l feasibility o

f permanen t

tota l enclosure s (PTE) ; factor s tha t

affect th e feasibility o f PT Esuc ha s produc t

size , operatio n grouping , an dven t

strea m concentration s an dai r

flow fromth e processe s wher e captur e system s ar e used ; an dinteraction s of

tiiese requirement s wit hOSH

A rules
. Fo r example , th e feasibility o f 10 0 percen t emission s captur e usin g PT Ei s basedo n dat afromtw o facilities
. W e believ e tha t th e proces s operation s i nthes e facilitie s ar e representativ e o

f th e industr y a s a whole
. However , w e ar e solicitin g commen t o ntype s o

f facilitie s tha t

may no t b e abl e t o appl y PTE , alon g wit h dat at o suppor t

thes e comments . We solici t dat ao nafacility' s ability t o maintai n an doperat e add-o ncontrols
. W e ar e especiall y intereste di ncos t an d desig n dat afromfacilitie s i nthi s industr y tha t

hav e successfull y applie d add-o n controls
. Datao ncontro l devic e inle t ai r flqw s an dHAPconcentration s combine dwit hworke r

exposur e monitorin g dat awoul db e especiall y useful
. We solici t

dat ao ntypica l operatin g hour s i nthi s industry , particularl y i n relatio nt o th e siz e o f facilitie s an dthei r

operation s (e.g. , resi n us e or numbe r o f employees ) sinc e operatin g hour s affect

cos t effectivenes s an dth e numbe r

o f start-up s an d shutdowns
. Th e propose drul e set s different threshold s fo

r existin g sourc e requirement s at

smal l versu s larg e businesses , abov e whic hcontro l o f HAP emission s b y 9 5 percen t

i s required
. Th e highe r threshol dfo

r smal l businesse s i s base do nconcern s tha t i t i s mor e difficul t fo r smal l businesse s t o rais e th e necessary capita l t o purchas e add-o n control s t o compl y wit hth e 9 5 percen t contro l level
. W

e solici t comment s o n thi s conclusion , alon g wit hdat ao n capita l availabilit y fo

r larg e an dsmal l businesse s an dth e impac t o f thi s threshol do nlarg e businesses
. We solici t informatio nan ddat ao nothe r factor s t o conside r i nevaluatin g contro l requirement s mor e stringen t tha nth e MACT floor, includin g dat ao ncost s t o th e industry
. We believ e tha t

w e hav e capture dth e ful l rang e o

f processe s an dproduct s i n ou r propose doperatio ngroups . We reques t comment s wit hsupportin g dat a o nan y processe s or

product s tha t

migh t no t b e adequatel y represented
. Alon g thes e lines , w e hav e specificall y provide dseparat e proces s group s fo r product s wit haClas s I smoke an dfire rating , an dhav e define dhig hstrength product s a s par t

o f th e corrosio n resistan t proces s grou p becaus e o f specifi c produc t

requirement s tha t requir e specialize dra w materials
. We solici t comment s o nthi s approac han d dat ao nan y additiona l processe s o r product s tha t

hav e uniqu e propertie s tha t may requir e separat e proces s grouping s fo

r MACT floor

development
. Thi s propose drul e contain s poin t valu e equation s fo

r ope nmoldin g an d centrifugal casting
. We are solicitin g comment s o n th e dat aan dassumption s use dt o develo p MACT poin t valu e equations,.an dinformatio no nothe r method s or

emissio nmodel s tha t

coul d b e use dt o ran k

facilitie s fo

r th e purpose s o

f settin g MACT
. W e als o solici t

informatio no nth e adequac y or

necessit y o

f th e monitoring , recordkeeping , an dreportin g requirement s i nthi s propose drule
. We specificall y solici t

comment s o nth e recordkeepin g an dreportin g burde n estimate s se t

fort hi nth e Paperwork Reductio n Ac t

discussio ni nthi s preambl e an dinformatio no nway s t o minimiz e responden t

burden
. IV . Summar

y o f Environmental , Energy , an d Economi cImpacts A. What Facilities Are Affected

By the Proposed NESHAP? Ther e ar e approximatel y 43 3 existin g facilitie s manufacturin g reinforce d plasti c composite s tha t

ar e major source s an dwoul db e subjec t t o th e propose dNESHAP
. Th e rat e o f growth fo r th e reinforce dplasti c composite s industr y i s estimate dto-b e 8 4 ne w facilitie s over

th e nex t 5 years . B. What Are the Air

Quality Impacts? Th e 199 7 baselin e HAPemission s fromth e reinforce dplasti c composite s industr y ar e approximatel y 22,20 0 tpy . Th e propose dNESHA

Pwoul dreduc e HAPfromexistin g source s b y 14,50 0 tpy , areductio no

f 6 5 percent . Th e propose dNESHA

Pwoul dresul t i nsmal l increase s i nothe r ai r pollutio n emission s fromcombustio ndevice s tha t wil l b e installe di nth e nex t 5 year s t o comply

- wit htoday' s propose drule E Thes e increase s resul t

frombot hth e combustio ndevic e directly , an d estimate demission s tha t

occu r at electrica l generatin g plant s t o generat e th e electricit y necessar y t o operat e th e add-o ncontrol s an dassociate dai r handlin g equipment
. Thes e emission s ar e estimate dt o b e 3 8 tp y o f sulfu r oxide s (SO x 

### ) , 6 9 tp y o

f nitroge noxide s (NO x 

### ) , 12 5 tp y o

f carbo nmonoxid e (CO) , an d1. 5 tp y o

f particulat e matte r (PM) emissions
. C. What Are the Water

Quality Impacts? We estimat e tha t

th e propose d Reinforce dPlasti c Composite s Productio nNESHA

Pwil l hav e n o . advers e wate r

qualit y impacts
. We d o no t expec t anyon e t o compl y b y usin g add-o ncontro l device s or proces s modification s tha t

woul dgenerat e wastewater . D. What Are the Solid

and Hazardous Waste Impacts? We estimat e tha t

the.propose d NESHAPwoul ddecreas e th e amoun t of soli dwast e generate db y th e reinforce d plasti c composite s industr y b y approximatel y 1,400 tpy . Th e decreas e i nsoli dwast e i s directl y relate dt o switchin g t o nonatomize dresi n applicatio nequipmen t

(i.e. , flowcoater s an dresi nrollers)
. Switchin g t o flowcoater s result s i nadecreas e i n overspra y becaus e o

f agreate r transfe r efficienc y o

f resi nfromflowcoater s t o th e par t bein g manufactured
. A decreas e i nresi noverspray consequenti y reduce s th e amoun t

o f wast e fromdisposabl e floor coverings , cure dresi nwaste , an d persona l protectiv e equipmen t (PPE ) fo r workers
. Disposabl e floor covering s ar e replace dp naperiodi c basi s t o preven t resi nbuildu p o nth e floor. We estimat e tha t soli dwast e generatio nof floor covering s wil l decreas e b y approximatel y 36 0 tp y an dtha t cure d resi nsoli dwast e wil l decreas e b y approximatel y 1,040 tpy . We projec t

tha t th e decrease d overspra y from flowcoaters wil l resul t i nadecrease dusag e o

f PPE , whic hals o consequentl y reduce s th e amoun t o f soli dwaste . Worker s wh o us e flo.wcoaters typicall y wear les s PP Etha nP.1 8

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s 4033 9 whe nusin g spra y gun s becaus e o f th e reduce dpresenc e o f

resi naerosol s an d lowe r styren e level s i nth e workplace
. Becaus e w e di dno t

hav e informatio no n th e man y differen t

type s o f PP E currentl y used , w e di dno t estimat e thi s decreas e i nsoli dwaste . Som e facilitie s tha t

switc hfromspra y gun s t o flowcoaters ma y hav e asmal l increas e o f

hazardou s wast e fromth e use dflowcoater

cleanin g solvents
. However , mos t

facilitie s woul dno t

se e a nincreas e unde r

thi s propose drule , an dth e overal l impac t

o nth e industr y wil l b e smal l relativ e t o th e soli dwast e reductions
. Nearl y al l flowcoaters requir e resi nan dcatalys t t o b e mixe d insid e th e gu n(internal-mix ) an dmus t b e flushedwhe nwor k

i s stoppe dfo r mor e tha nafe w minutes
. External-mi x spra y gun s d o no t

nee dt o b e flushed becaus e resi ni s mixe dwit hcatalys t outsid e th e gun . Facilitie s tha t switc h fromexternal-mi x spra y gun s t o flowcoaters wil l us e mor e solvent
. Solven t usag e shoul dno t

chang e a t facilitie s switchin g frominternal-mi x spra y gun s t o flowcoaters
. Th e mos t commo nflushin g solvent s ar e aceton e an dwater-base demulsifiers
. Only , a coupl e o f

ounce s o f

solven t ar e typicall y neede dt o flus hth e mixin g chambe r an d nozzl e o f

flowcoater s an dinternal-mi x spra y guns . W e d o no t

hav e adequat e dat at o , predic t th e potentia l solven t

wast e impac t fromswitchin g t o flowcoaters
. Th e magnitud e o f

th e impac t

depend s o nth e typ e of-gu n currenti y use d (internal

- o r

external-mix) , th e frequenc y o f

flushing, an dth e typ e of
. solven t used
. However , becaus e o f th e smal l amoun t

o f solven t used , an dsinc e mos t i s allowe dt o evaporate , w e believ e th e overal l solven t

wast e increas e wil l b e smal l compare dt o th e soli dwast e reductions
. E. What Are the Energy Impacts? W e determine dtha t

th e overal l energ y deman dfo r

operation s i nth e Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Productio nsourc e categor y coul dincreas e by.15 9 millio n standar dcubi c fee t

pe r yea r o f natura l gas , an d1 0 millio nkilowat t hour s o f electricit y pe r

yea r a s aresul t

o f th e propose drule
. W e determine dthi s ne t increas e base do nth e additiona l energ y deman dfo r

contro l device s installe dt o mee t th e propose dstandards
. N o informatio nfo r

compariso ni s availabl e o nth e baselin e energ y consumptio nfo r thi s sourc e category . F. What Are the Cost

Impacts? W e hav e estimate dth e capita l cost s fo r emissio ncontro l equipment , includin g equipmen t

suc ha s ope n containe r

covers , resi nbat henclosures , captur e systems , an dcontro l device s a s $73. 9 millio n fo r

existin g source s an d $11. 7 millio nfo r

ne w sources . Th e capita l cost s includ e th e cost s t o purchas e an dinstal l th e contro l equipment
. W e hav e estimate dtha t annua l cost s o f th e propose drul e ar e $26. 0 millio n pe r yea r fo r existin g source s an d$3. 2 millio n fo r

ne w sources . Annua l cost s includ e fixedannua l costs , suc ha s reporting , recordkeepin g an dcapita l amortization , an dvariabl e annua l cost s such v a s natura l gas . Th e estimate d averag e cos t

o f th e propose drul e i s $1,60 0 pe r

to no f HA Pemission s reductio nfo r

existin g source s an d $2,20 0 pe r

to n o f HA Pemission s reductio nfo r

ne w sources . A s discusse delsewher e i nthi s preamble , w e wil l revie w i nmor e dept h th e industry' s analysi s o nth e cos t o f thi s propose drul e followin g proposal
. Wher e appropriate , w e wil l mak e change s t o ou r

estimate s o f

cost s base d o nou r revie w an do n comment s w e receive , an dmak e th e result s o f ou r detaile drevie w availabl e i n th e publi c docke t a t promulgation
. G. What Are the Economic Impacts? Th e Agenc y conducte dadetaile d economi c impac t

analysi s t o determin e th e market

- an dindustry-leve l impact s associate dwit hth e propose drule
. W e expec t th e aggregat e pric e increas e fo r reinforce dplasti c composite s woul db e onl y 0. 3 percent , o r

$0.0 1 pe r

pound , a s aresul t o f th e propose dstandards
. W e projec t tha t directl y affecte dproducer s woul dreduc e tota l productio n b y 0. 8 percent , whil e producer s no t direcd y affecte dwoul dincreas e thei r productio n b y 0. 3 percent . Market s fo r reinforce dplasti c composite s use di n genera l construction , corrosion-resistan t products , an dlan dtransportatio n ar e expecte dt o b e mor e heavil y impacte d wit hpric e increase s o f u p t o 0. 5 percen t an dreduction s i n direcd y affecte d domesti c productio no f betwee n1 an d 1. 5 percent . I nterms-s f

industr y impacts , captiv e producer s o f

reinforce dplasti c composite s ar e expecte dt o full y absor b thei r complianc e costs , whil e merchan t producer s wil l attemp t t o pas s throug h cost s t o thei r

customers . Throug hth e marke t impact s describe dabove , th e propose dNESHA Pcreat e bot hgainer s an dloser s withi nth e merchan t segment . Som e merchan t

facilitie s ar e projecte d t o experienc e profi t

increase s wit hth e propose drule ; however , th e majorit y tha t continu e operatin g ar e projecte dt o los e profits
. Furthermore , th e economi c impac t analysi s indicate s tha t 2 9 ou t o f 29 9 merchan t

facilitie s (9. 7 percent ) an d 7 3 ou t o f 47 1 produc t

line s (15. 5 percent ) a t thes e facilitie s ar e a t

ris k o f closur e becaus e o f

th e propose d NESHAP
. Al l ofth e facilitie s determine dt o b e a t

ris k fo r closur e ar e believe dt o b e smal l businesses
. Mor e informatio no nth e measure s w e hav e take n t o minimiz e thes e impact s ma y b e foun di nth e Regulator y Flexibilit y Ac t discussio n i nthi s preamble
. Base do n th e marke t

analysis , th e annua l socia l cost s ofth e propose drul e ar e projecte dt o b e $25. 7 million
. Thes e cost s ar e distribute dacros s th e man y consumer s an dproducer s o f reinforce d plasti c composites
. Producers , i n aggregate , ar e expecte dt o bea r $10. 6 millio n annuall y i n costs , wit hthos e directl y affecte db y th e propose d NESHA Plosin g $19. 3 millio n an dthos e no t subjec t t o th e propose dNESHA P gainin g $8. 7 million
. Th e consumer s o f reinforce dplasti c composite s ar e expecte dt o incu r

th e remainin g $15. 1 millio n i ncost s associate dwit hth e propose dNESHAP
. Fo r mor e information , consul t

th e docke t

fo r thi s project
. V . Relationshi p o f

Propose d NESHA Pt o Othe rStandard s an d Program s Unde r th e CA A A. National

Emission Standards for Closed Vent Systems, Control

Devices, Recovery Devices, and

Routing to a Fuel Gas System or

a Process (40CFR Part 63, Subpart

SS) If yo u us e a n add-o ncontro l device(s ) t o contro l emissions , yo u wil l nee dt o compl y wit hcertai nprovision s i n 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

SS , fo r add-o n controls
. Th e standard s i nsubpar t S S cite db y th e propose dNESHA Par e applicabl e t o mos t

source s usin g a n add

o n contro l device
. Th e propose d NESHA Pcit e thes e section s i nsubpar t S S rathe r tha n repeatin g the mi n th e propose dregulator y text . B. Operating Permit

Program Unde r di e operatin g permi t

progra m codifie da t

4 0 CF Rpart s 7 0 an d71 , al l majo r source s subjec t

t o standard s unde r sectio n11 1 o r

11 2 ofth e CA A mus t obtai na noperatin g permi t (Se e § § 70.3(a)(1 ) an d71.3(a)(1))
. Therefore , al l majo r source s subjec t

t o thes e propose dNESHA Pmus t obtai na n operatin g permit
. Som e reinforce dplasti c composite s productio n facilitie s ma y b e majo r source s base dsolel y o nthei r potentia l t o emi t eve nthoug hthei r

actua l emission s ar e belo w th e majo r sourc e level
. Thes e facilitie s ma y choos e t o obtai n afederall y enforceabl e limi t o n thei r potentia l t o emi t

s o tha t the y ar e n o longe r

considere dmajo r

source s subjec t t o th e propose dNESHAP
.P.1 9



### 4034 0 

### Federa l Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. ,149/'Thursday,'Augus t 2 , 2 DO l 7 Propose dRule s Source s tha t

op t t o limi t thei r potentia l t o emi t (e.g. , limit s o noperatin g hour s o r amoun t o f materia l used ) ar e referre d t o b y th e EP A a s "syntheti c area " sources . T o becom e asyntheti c are a source , yo u mus t

contac t you r loca l permittin g authorit y t o obtai na n operatin g permi t

wit hth e appropriat e operatin g limits
. Thes e operatin g limit s wil l the nb e federall y enforceabl e unde r 4 0 CF R70.6(b)
. C. NESHAPfor

Plastic Parts and Products Ther e ar e currentl y NESHA Punde r developmen t

fo r proposa l tha t

wil l regulat e coatin g o f

plasti c part s an d products
. Th e SBA RPane l recommende dtha t

w e conside r

th e interactio no f

th e Plasti c Part s an d Produc t NESHA Pwit htoday' s propose d NESHAP
. Th e Plasti c Part s an d Product s NESHA Pma y potentiall y affec t facilitie s tha t

produc e reinforce d plasti c part s an dthe nappl y acoatin g t o th e finishedparts . W e hav e coordinate d wit hthi s projec t

an dhav e determine d tha t ther e shoul db e n o overla p (i.e. , specifi c operation s covere db y today' s propose dNESHA Pshoul dno t als o b e covere di nth e Plasti c Part s an d Product s NESHAP)
. W e hav e no t determine dan y requirement s o f th e propose dNESHA Ptha t woul doverlap , conflict , o r

caus e aduplicatio no f effort
. VI . Administrativ e Requirement s A. Executive Order

12866: Regulatory Planning and

Review Unde r Executiv e Orde r

1286 6 (5 8 F R 51735 , Octobe r

4,1993) , w e mus t determin e whethe r

apropose d regulator y actio ni s "significant " an d therefor e subjec t

t o Offic e o f Managemen t

an dBudge t

(OMB ) revie w an ddi e requirement s o f th e Executiv e Order
. Th e Executiv e Orde r define s "significan t regulator y action " a s on e tha t i s likel y t o resul t

i n arul e tha t

may : (1 ) Hav e a n annua l effec t o n th e econom y o f

$10 0 millio n o r

mor e o r adversel y affec t

ir i amateria l wa y th e economy , asecto r

o f th e economy , productivity , competition , jobs , tiie environment , publi c healt ho r safety , o r State , local , o r

triba l government s o r communities ; (2 ) Creat e aseriou s inconsistenc y o r otherwis e interfer e wit ha nactio ntake n o r planne db y anothe r

agency ; (3 ) Materiall y alte r

th e budgetar y impac t o f entitlements , grants , use r fees , o r loa nprogram s o r

th e right s an d obligation s o f

recipient s thereof ; o r (4 ) Rais e nove l lega l o r polic y issue s arisin g ou t

o f lega l mandates , th e President' s priorities , o r th e principle s se t fort hi n th e Executiv e Order
. Pursuan t t o th e term s o f

EExecutiv e Orde r 12866 , OM B ha s notifie dEP A tha t i t consider s thi s rulemakin g a "significan t

regulator y action " withi n th e meanin g o f

th e Executiv e Order
. Th e EP A submitte dthi s actio n t p OM B fo r review
. Change s mad e i n respons e t o suggestion s o r

recommendation s from OM B ar e documente dan dinclude di n th e publi c record
. B. Paperwork

Reduction Act Th e informatio n collectio n requirement s i nthi s propose drul e hav e bee nsubmitte dfo r

approva l t o th e OM B unde r th e Paperwor k

Reductio nAct , 4 4 U.S.C
. 350 1 et

seq. A nIC Rdocumen t ha s bee nprepare db y EP A (IC RNo. ) an dacop y ma y b e obtaine dfro mSand y Farme r b y mai l a t

th e Offic e o f Environmenta l Information , Collectio n Strategie s Divisio n(2822) , U.S
. EPA , 120 0 Pennsylvani aAvenue , NW , Washington , D C 20460 , b y e-mai l a t "farmer.sandy@epa.gov, " o r b y callin g (202 ) 260-2740
. A cop y ma y als o b e downloade dfromth e interne t a t "http: / /www.epa.gov/icr. " Thes e propose dNESHA Pcontai n monitoring , reporting , an d recordkeepin g requirements
. W e believ e tha t th e propose dnotice s an dreport s ar e th e minimu mneede db y u s t o determin e i f

yo u ar e subjec t

t o th e NESEHA Pan dwhethe r

yo u ar e i n compliance
. W e believ e th e propose d recordkeepin g requirement s ar e th e minimu mnecessar y t o determin e initia l an dongoin g compliance
. Base do n reporte dinformation , w e woul ddecid e whic hreinforce dplasti c composite s facilitie s an dwha t

record s o r

processe s shoul db e inspected
. Th e recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirement s ar e consisten t

wit hth e Genera l Provision s o f .4 0 CF Rpar t

63
. Thes e propose drecordkeepin g an d reportin g requirement s ar e specificall y authorize db y sectio n 11 4 o f di e CA A (4 2 U.S.C
. 7414)
. Al l informatio n submitte dt o u s fo r

whic haclai mo f confidentialit y i s mad e wil l b e safeguarde daccordin g t o ou r policie s i n 4 0 CF Rpar t

2
.

- Th e EP A expect s [thes e propose d NESHA Pt o affec t

atota l o f approximatel y 48 6 facilitie s ove r th e first 3 year s afte r

promulgatio n o f

th e rule
. Thi s include s 43 3 existin g facilities , an d5 3 ne w reinforce dplasti c composite s facilitie s wil l becom e subjec t t o th e propose dNESHA Pdurin g th e firs t 3 years . Th e estimate daverag e annua l burde n fo r th e first 3 year s afte r

promulgatio n o f thes e propose dNESHA Pfo r industr y an dth e implementin g agenc y i s outline dbelow
. Yo u ca n fin dth e detail s o f thi s informatio ncollectio n i n th e "Standar dFor m8 3 Supportin g Statemen t

fo r IC RNo
. 1976.01, " i n Docke t No
. A-94-52
. Affecte d entit y Tota l hour s Labo rcost s Tota l annua l O& M cost s Tota l cost s Industr y Implementin g agency 15,12 2 11,29 3 $673,12 0

450,97 2 $17,26 5

N A $690,38 5 450,97 2
Burde nmean s th e tota l time , effort , o r financial resource s expende db y person s t o generate , maintain , retain , o r disclos e o r provid e informatio nt o o r fo r a Federa l agency . Thi s include s th e time neede dt p revie w instructions ; develop , acquire , install , an dutiliz e technolog y an dsystem s fo r

th e purpose s o f collecting , validating , an dverifyin g information , processin g an d maintainin g information , an ddisclosin g an dprovidin g information ; adjus t th e existin g way s t o compl y wit han y previousl y applicabl e instruction s an d requirements ; trai npersonne l t o b e abl e t o respon dt o acollectio n o f information ; searc hdat asources ; complet e an drevie w th e collectio n o f information ; an dtransmi t o r otherwis e disclos e th e information
. A nagenc y ma y no t

conduc t o r sponsor , an daperso n i s no t require dt o respon dt o acollectio n o f informatio n unles s i t display s acurrentl y vali dOM B contro l number
. Contro l number s fo r EPA' s regulation s ar e liste di n 4 0 CF R par t 9 an d4 8 CF Rchapte r

15
. Comment s ar e requeste do n th e

Agency' s nee dfo r

thi s information , th e accurac y o f

th e provide dburde n estimates , an dan y suggeste dmethod s fo r minimizin g responden t burden , includin g th e us e o f

automate d collectio ntechniques
. Sen dcomment s o nth e IC Rt o th e Director , Offic e o f Environmenta l Information , Collectio n Strategie s Divisio n (2822) , U.S
. EPA , 120 0 Pennsylvani aAvenu e NW , Washington , D C 20460 ; an dt o th e Offic e o f Informatio n an dRegulator yP.2 0

Federa l Register /Vol • 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s 

### 4034 1 Affairs , OMB , 72 5 17t hStreet , NW , Washington , D C 20503 , marke d "'Attention : Des k

Office r fo r EPA. " Includ e th e IC Rnumbe r i nan y correspondence
. Sinc e OM B i s require d t o mak e adecisio nconcernin g th e IC R betwee n3 0 an d6 0 day s afte r Augus t 2 , .--2001 , acommen t

t o OM B i s bes t

assure d o f havin g it s ful l effec t

i f OM B receive s i t b y Septembe r

4 , 2001
. Th e fina l rul e wil l respon dt o an y OMB?o r publi c comment s o nth e informatio n collectio n requirement s containe di nthi s proposal
. C. Executive Order

13132, Federalism Executiv e Orde r

13132 , entitle d "Federalism " (6 4 F R43255 , Augus t 10 , 1999) , require s EP A t o develo p a n accountabl e proces s t o ensur e "meaningfu l an dtimely inpu t b y Stat e an dloca l official s i nth e developmen t o f regulator y policie s tha t hav e federalis m implications. " "Policie s tha t hav e federalis mimplications " i s define di n th e Executiv e Orde r

t o includ e regulation s tha t

hav e "substantia l direc t effect s o nth e States , o nthe.relationshi p betwee nthe
. nationa l governmen t an d th e States , o r

o nth e distributio no f powe r an dresponsibilitie s amon g th e variou s level s o f

government. " Thi s propose drul e doe s no t hav e federalis mimplications
. I t wil l no t hav e substantia l direc t

effect s o nth e States , o nth e relationshi p betwee nth e nationa l governmen t

an dth e States , o r

o nth e distributio no f

powe r an d responsibilitie s amon g th e variou s level s o f government , a s specifie di n Executiv e Orde r

13132
. N o reinforce d plasti c composite s productio nfacilitie s subjec t t o thes e propose dNESHA Par e owne db y Stat e o r

loca l governments . Therefore , Stat e an dloca l government s will , no t hav e an y direc t

complianc e 'cost s resultin g fromthi s propose drule
. Furthermore , thes e propose dNESHA P d o no t requir e thes e government s t o tak e o nan y newresponsibilities
. Thus , th e requirement s o f

sectio n6 o f

th e Executiv e Orde r

d o no t appl y t o thi s propose drule
. Thus , Executiv e Orde r 1313 2 does:no t

appl y t o thi s rule
. I nth e spirit-o f

Executiv e Orde r

13132 , an dconsisten t

wit hEP A polic y t o promot e communication s betwee nEP A an dStat e an dloca l governments , EP A specificall y solicit s commen t o nthi s propose drul e fromStat e an dloca l officials
. D..Executive Order

13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments Executiv e Orde r

13175 , entitle d "Consultatio nan dCoordinatio nwit h India nTriba l Governments " (6 5 F R 67249 , Novembe r

6 , 2000) , require s EP A t o develo p a naccountabl e proces s t o ensur e "meaningfu l an dtimely inpu t b y triba l official s i nth e developmen t o f regulator y policie s tha t hav e triba l implications. " "Policie s tha t have , triba l implications " i s define di nth e Executiv e Orde r

t o includ e regulation s tha t hav e "substantia l direc t effect s o n on e o r mor e India ntribes , o nth e relationshi p betwee n th e Federa l governmen t

an dth e India ntribes , o r o n th e distributio no f

powe r an d responsibilitie s betwee n th e Federa l governmen t

an dIndia ntribes. "

. Thi s propose drul e doe s no t hav e triba l implications
. I t

wil l no t hav e substantia l direc t

effect s or i triba l governments , o nth e relationshi p betwee nth e Federal-governmen t an d India ntribes , o r

o nth e distributio n o f -powe r an dresponsibilitie s betwee n th e Federa l governmen t

an dIndia n tribes , a s specifie di n Executiv e Orde r 13175 , becaus e w e ar e no t

awar e o f

an y India n triba l government s o r

communitie s affecte db y th e propose drule
. Thus , Executiv e Orde r

1317 5 doe s no t

appl y t o thi s propose drule
. I nth e spiri t

o f Executiv e Orde r

13175 , an dconsisten t

wit hEP A polic y t o promot e communication s betwee nEP A an dtriba l governments , EP A specificall y solicits : additiona l commen t o nthi s propose drul e fromtriba l officials
. E. Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Titl e I I o f

th e Unfunde dMandate s Refor mAc t

o f 199 5 (UMRA) , Publi c La w 104-4 , establishe s requirement s fo r Federa l agencie s t o asses s th e effect s o f thei t regulator y action s o n State , local , an dtriba l government s an dth e privat e sector . Unde r

sectio n20 2 o f

di e UMRA , w e mus t generall y prepar e awritte n statement , includin g acost-benefi t .analysis , fo r

propose dan dfinal rule s "wit h"Federa l mandates " tha t ma y resul t i n expenditure s t o "State , local , an dtriba l governments , i n th e aggregate , o r t o th e private , sector , o f $10 0 millio n o r mor e i nan y 1 year . Befor e promulgatin g arul e fo r whic hawritte n * statemen t

i s needed , sectio n 20 5 o f th e UMR A generall y require s u s t o identify an dconside r

areasonabl e numbe r

o f regulator y alternative s an dadop t th e leas t costly , mos t

cos t effective , o r

leas t burdensom e alternativ e tha t achieve s th e objective s o f

therule
. Th e provision s o f

sectio n 20 5 d o no t

appl y whe nthe y ar e inconsistent-wit h applicabl e law
. Moreover , sectio n 20 5 allow s u s t o adop t

a n alternativ e othe r tha nth e leas t

costly , mos t

cost-effective , o r leas t burdensom e alternativ e i f th e Administrato r

publishe s wit hth e fina l rul e a nexplanatio nwh y tha t alternativ e wa s no t adopted
. Befor e w e establis h an y regulator y requirement s tha t ma y significantl y o r

uniquel y affec t

small.
. governments , includin g triba l governments , i t

mus t hav e develope d unde r sectio n20 3 o f

th e UMR A aSmal l governmen t

agenc y plan
. Th e pla n mus t provid e fo r

notifyin g potentiall y affecte dsmal l governments , enablin g official s o f

affecte dsmal l government s t o hav e meaningfu l an dtimel y inpu t i n th e developmen t

o f ou r regulator y proposal s wit hsignifican t Federa l intergovernmenta l mandates , an d informing , educating , an dadvisin g smal l government s o n complianc e wit h th e regulator y requirements
. W e hav e determine dtha t thi s proposed.xul e doe s no t contai n a Federa l mandat e tha t

ma y resul t

i n expenditure s o f

$10 0 millio n o r

mor e b y State , local , an dtriba l governments , i n th e aggregate , o r

th e privat e secto r

i n an y 1 year . Th e tota l cos t t o th e privat e secto r i s approximatel y $29. 2 millio n pe r year . Thi s propose drul e contain s n o mandate s affectin g State , local , o r Triba l governments . Thus , today' s propose d rul e i s no t

subjec t t o th e requirement s o f section s 20 2 an d20 5 ofth e UMRA
. W e hav e determine dtha t thi s propose drul e contain s n o regulator y requirement s tha t

migh t significantl y o r uniquel y affec t

smal l government s becaus e i t

contain s n o .requirement s tha t appl y t o suc hgovernment s o r impos e obligation s upo nthem
. F. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

of 1996 (SBREFA), 5U.S.C. 601 et seq. Th e RF A generall y require s a n agenc y to-prepair e aregulator y flexibility analysi s o f

an y rul e subjec t

t o notic e an dcommen t

rulemakin g requirement s unde r th e Administrativ e Procedur e Act
. o r an y othe r

statut e unles s th e agenc y certifie s tha t

th e rul e wil l no t

hav e a significan t

economi c impac t

o na substantia l numbe r

o f smal l entities
. Smal l entitie s includ e smal l businesses , smal l organizations , an dsmal l governmenta l jurisdictions
. Fo r purpose s o f

assessin g th e impact s o f today' s propose drul e o n smal l entities , smal l entit y i s define da s (1 ) a smal l busines s rangin g from500-1,00 0 employees ; (2 ) asmal l governmenta l jurisdiction ^ tha t

i s agovernmen t

o f a city , county , town , schoo l distric t o r specialxiistric t

wit hapopulatio n o f

les s tha n50,000 ; an d(3 ) asmal l organizatio ntha t

i s an y not-for-profi t enterpris e whic hi s independentl y owne dan doperate dan di s no t dominan t

i nit s field
. Th e tabl e belo w present s th e siz e threshol dfo r smal l businesse s b y SI C Code
.P.2 1

4034 2 " Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s

Categor y

Manufacturin g SI C code s

362 1 371 1 371 6 372 8 374 3 282 1 329 6 343 1 353 1 361 2 361 3 366 3 371 4 Al l othe ridentifie d SI C Code s i n thi s sourc e cat egory . NAIC S code s

33531 2 336211 , 336112

. 33612

. 336213

. 336413

. 33651

. 32521 1 327993

. 332998

. 33312,33651

. 335311

. 335313

. 33422

. 33653 , 336399

. Al l othe ridentifie d NAIC S Code s i n thi s sourc e cat egory . Maximu m numbe rof employee s t o b e con sidere d a smal l busi nes s 100 0

75 0

50 0

I naccordanc e wit hsectio n60 3 o f th e RFA , EP A prepare da ninitia l regulator y flexibilit y analysi s (IRFA ) tha t examine s th e impac t

o f th e propose drul e o nsmal l entitie s alon g wit hregulator y alternative s tha t

coul dreduc e tha t impact
. Th e IRF A i s availabl e fo r revie w i nth e docke t

an di s summarize dbelow
. Sectio n11 2 ofth e CA A require s u s t o lis t categorie s an dsubcategorie s o f majo r source s and , i nsom e cases , are a source s o f

HA Pan dt o establis h NESHA Pfo r

th e liste dsourc e categorie s an dsubcategories
. Reinforce dplasti c composite s productio n(majo r source s only ) wa s include do nth e initia l lis t o f sourc e categorie s publishe do nJul y 16 , 199 2 (5 7 F R31576)
. Majo r source s o f HA Par e thos e tiiat

hav e th e potentia l t o emi t greate r tha n1 0 tp y o f

an y on e HA P o r 2 5 tp y o f

an y combinatio no f

HAP
. Th e objectiv e o f

thi s propose drul e i s t p appl y standard s base do nmaximu m achievabl e contro l technolog y t o al l majo r source s i nthi s sourc e category . Th e criteri ause dt o establis hMAC T ar e containe di nsectio n11 2 (d ) o f th e CAA
. Base do nSB A siz e definition s an d reporte dsale s an demploymen t data , EP A identifie d27 8 ofth e 35 6 companie s ownin g reinforce dplasti c composite s facilitie s a s smal l businesses
. Althoug hsmal l businesse s represen t

almos t 8 0 percen t

o f th e companie s withi nth e sourc e category , the y ar e expecte dt o incu r onl y 3 1 percen t o f th e tota l industr y complianc e cost s o f $26. 0 million
. Th e averag e tota l annua l complianc e cos t i s projecte dt o b e $30,00 0 pe r

smal l compan y a s compare dt o th e industr y averag e o f $70,00 0 pe r

company . Unde r

th e propose dstandards , th e mea nannua l complianc e cost , a s ashar e o f sales , fo r smal l businesse s i s 0. 7 percent , an dth e

media ni s 0. 4 percent , wit harang e o f 0.0 1 t o 7. 5 percent . Th e EP A estimate s tha t 1 7 percen t

o f smal l businesse s (o r 4 7 firms ) ma y experienc e a n impac t greate r tha n1 percen t

o f sales , bu t

onl y 3 percen t

o f smal l businesse s (o r

8 firms) ma y experienc e a nimpac t greate r tha n 3 percen t

o f sales
. Th e Agenc y als o performe da n economi c impac t

analysi s (EIA ) tha t accounte dfo r

firmbehavio r

t o provid e a nestimat e o f

th e facilit y an dmarke t impact s o f

th e regulation
. Thi s industr y i s characterize db y profi t margin s o f

3 t o 4 percent . Smal l businesse s wer e foun dt o hav e highe r

per-uni t productio n cost s unde r baselin e condition s an dincu r

slightl y highe r

per uni t complianc e costs . A s aresul t o f thes e factors , th e economi c analysi s indicate s tha t

almos t 1 0 percen t

o f facilitie s owne db y smal l busines s ar e a t ris k o f closur e becaus e o f

thi s propose d' rule
. Althoug han y facilit y closure s ar e caus e fo r concern , th e numbe r

o f facilitie s a t

ris k fo r closur e woul db e th e sam e i f thi s propose drul e require donl y th e MAC T floo r

leve l o f contro l fo r

al l facilities
. Th e MAC T floor i s th e leas t stringen t leve l allowe db y statute . A s discusse dbelow , thi s propose drul e contain s asignifican t

numbe r o f accommodation s fo r

smal l business
. Withou t additiona l data , w e do^no t believ e w e ca n mak e th e propose drul e an y les s stringen t

an dcompl y -withth e objective s o f

th e CAA
. I nthi s regard , w e hav e requeste ddat aan dcommen t elsewher e i nthi s preambl e o n issue s relevan t t o thi s industry
. Th e EPA' s effort s t o minimiz e small

busines s impact s hav e materiall y improve dtoday' s proposal
. Economi c analysi s o f

provision s unde r

earlie r ' consideratio nfo r

inclusio n i n thi s propose drul e indicate dgreate r impact s o nsmal l businesse s tha n thos e propose dtoday
. I nearlie r versions , almos t 4 2 percen t

o f th e tote dindustr y complianc e cost s woul dhav e bee n incurre db y smal l businesse s (compare d wit h3 1 percen t

o f cost s incurre db y smal l businesse s i n today' s proposal). ' Th e averag e tota l annua l complianc e cos t woul dhav e bee nroughl y $50,00 0 pe r smal l compan y (compare dwit h $30,00 0 i ntoday' s proposal)
. Abou t 2 2 percen t o f smal l businesse s (o r

6 0 firms) woul dhav e experience da n impac t greate r tha n1 percen t

o f sale s (compare dwit h1 7 percen t o f smal l businesse s i ntoday' s proposal)
. An d7 percen t o f smal l businesse s (o r

1 9 firms ) woul dhav e experience dimpact s greate r tha n3 percen t

o f sale s (compare dwit h 3 percen t

o f smal l businesse s i n today' s proposal)
. Th e reductio ni nsmall

busines s cost s fromearlie r version s o f thi s propose drul e i s attributabl e t o EPA' s outreac han daccommodatio n fo r smal l firm s i nkeepin g wit hbot hRF A an dCA A requirements , includin g th e conduc t o f aSBA RPanel , a s discusse d furthe r below
. Th e propose dreportin g an d recordkeepin g requirement s fo r thes e smal l businesse s includ e initia l notifications , startu p notification s an d complianc e reports . Thes e requirement s wer e discusse di nmor e detai l unde r th e discussio n o f

th e Paperwor k

Reductio n Ac t above
. W e estimat e tha t 30 2 existin g facilitie s owne db y smal l businesse s wil l b e impacte db y thes e requirements , an d5 3 ne w facilitie s wil l b e impacte d i nth e firs t

thre e years . Th e professiona lP.2 2

Federa l Register /Afof e 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4034 3 skill s require dt o complet e dies e report s includ e th e abilit y t o calculat e '

. emission s an dresi nus e an drea dan d follo w repor t

forma t guidance
. Al l facilitie s impacte db y thi s propose drul e shoul dhav e personne l wit hth e necessar y skill s becaus e the y woul d nee dthes e skill s t o compl y wit hothe r regulator y requirement s suc ha s Toxi c Releas e Inventor y (TRI ) reporting
. Provision s t o minimiz e th e reportin g an drecordkeepin g requirement s o n smal l busines s hav e bee nincorporate d int o thi s propose drule
. Thes e provision s includ e allowing : Th e facilit y t o substantiat e resi nan dge l coa t HA Pcontent s wit hMateria l Safet y Dat a Sheet s rathe r

the nrequirin g testin g o f eac hresi nan dge l coat ; us e o f resi n purchas e record s t o determin e resi nuse ; an dexemptio no f

facilitie s tha t

ca n demonstrat e tha t

al l thei r resi nan dge l coat s compl y wit hth e require dHA P conten t limit s fromth e requiremen t t o kee p record s o f

resi nus e an dcalculat e poin t valu e averages . Thes e provision s hav e als o bee nextende dt o al l companie s subjec t

t o today' s propose d NESHAP
. Thes e facilitie s may . als o b e subjec t t o th e NESHA Pbein g develope dfo r plasti c part s an dproducts
. Ther e shoul db e n o duplicatio no f

effort a s aresul t

o f thi s propose drul e an dth e Plasti c Part s an d Product s NESHA Pbein g develope d becaus e thes e NESHA Pwil l cove r differen t operations
. Facilitie s subjec t t o thi s propose drul e ar e als o subjec t t o emission s estimat e reportin g unde r th e TR I requirements
. I nthi s propose drule , w e coul ddetermin e n o way s t o combin e TR I an dth e reportin g requirement s o f th e propose dNESHA Pbecaus e th e objective s an dstatutor y authoritie s o f thes e requirement s ar e different
. However , w e invit e comment s fro mal l intereste dpartie s o nway s t o combin e thes e report s an dstil l mee t th e statutor y requirement s o f

th e CAA
. A s indicate dabove , w e hav e incorporate dsignifican t alternative s int o th e propose drul e t o minimiz e th e impac t o nsmal l busines s bu t stil l mee t th e objective s o f

th e CAA
. A s require db y sectio n609(b ) o f th e RFA , EP A conducte doutreac ht o smal l entitie s an dconvene daSBA Rpane l t o revie w advic e an drecommendation s fromrepresentative s o f th e smal l entitie s tha t

potentiall y woul db e subjec t t o th e propose drul e requirements
. Th e pane l convene do n Apri l 6 , 200 0 an dwa s comprise do f representative s fromOMB , th e SB A Offic e o f Advocacy , th e EP A Smal l Busines s Advocac y Chair , an dth e Emissio nStandard s Divisio no f th e Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an d Standard s o f

EPA
. Th e pane l solicite d advic e from1 7 smal l entit y representative s (SER ) fro macross sectio no f

th e differen t

industr y sector s likel y t o b e directl y regulate db y thi s action
. O nApri l 18 , 2000 , th e pane l distribute dapackag e o f descriptiv e an d technica l material s explainin g th e rule

in-progres s t o th e SER
. O nMa y 2 , 2000 , th e pane l me t

wit hth e SE Rt o hea r

tiieir comment s o n preliminar y option s fo r regulator y flexibility an drelate d information
. Th e pane l als o receive d writte ncomment s fromth e SERi n respons e t o bot hth e outreac hmaterial s an dth e discussion s a t

th e meeting
. Consisten t

wit hRFA/SBREF A requirements , th e pane l evaluate dth e assemble dmaterial s an dsmall-entit y comment s o hissue s relate dt o th e element s o f

th e IRFA
. A cop y o f

th e pane l repor t

i s include di n th e docke t fo r thi s propose drule
. Th e pane l considere dnumerou s regulator y flexibilit y option s i n respons e t o concern s raise db y th e SER
. Th e majo r

concern s include dth e affordabilit y an dtechnica l feasibilit y o f add-o ncontrols , th e resi nan dge l coa t HA Pcontent s require dt o mee t som e o f th e MAC T floors , an dth e regulator y treatmen t

o f specialit y products
. Thes e ar e th e majo r

pane l recommendation s an dEPA' s respons e i ntoday' s proposal : • Recommen dsettin g highe r threshold s tha n EP A ha dinitiall y considere dfo r

requirement s t o us e add

o ncontrols
. Response: I ntoday' s action , EP A propose s t o allo w facilitie s owne db y smal l firms t o emi t

25 0 tp y (a s distinc t fromth e 10 0 tp y limi t

fo r facilitie s owne db y larg e firms ) befor e installin g add-o ncontrols
. • Recommen dsettin g th e ne w sourc e floor fo r small-owne dsource s a t th e leve l o f th e existin g sourc e floor
. Response: Today' s proposa l include s thi s provision
. • Recommen destablishin g separat e floor s fo r specialit y products
. Response: Today' s proposa l include s thi s provision
. • Explor e pollution-preventio n alternative s t o add-o n controls
. Response: Th e EP A di dexplor e thi s possibilit y wit hindustr y sources . Althoug hw e coul dno t devis e a workabl e pollution-preventio n/ alternativ e t o includ e i ntoday' s proposal , th e Agenc y i s requestin g commen t

o n ho w suc hamechanis m migh t b e structure dwithi n th e requirement s o f

th e CAA
. • Recommen dallowin g individua l facilitie s t o us e th e sam e resi n i nal l resi napplicatio nprocesses . Response: Today' s proposa l include s thi s provision
. • Reconside r th e resi n HA Pconten t requiremen t

fo r toolin g resins
. Response: Today' s proposa l include s arevise dprovision
. • Recommen dseparat e floors fo r whit e an dnon-whit e ge l coats . Response: Today' s proposa l include s thi s provision
. • Reconside r

th e Agency' s estimate s ofth e cos t

o f add-o n controls
. Response: Eve nthoug htoday' s proposa l eliminate s th e likelihoo dtha t existin g small-owne dfacilitie s wil l b e subjec t t o add-o ncontrols , EP A ha s reconsidere dit s cos t

estimate s i n ligh t o f thos e offere db y th e industry
. A s discusse delsewher e i n thi s preamble , EP A continue s t o believ e ou r estimate s ar e realistic
. Nevertheless , a s mentione d i nsectio nIII-M , w e ar e solicitin g comment s o nal l dat aan dassumption s tha t affec t add-o n contro l costs . Moreover , a s mentione dpreviously , w e wil l revie w i n mor e dept hth e industry' s analysi s o nth e cos t

o f thi s propose d rul e followin g proposal
. Wher e appropriate , w e wil l mak e change s t o ou r estimate s o f

cost s base do n ou r revie w an do n comment s w e receive , an dmak e th e result s o f ou r detaile d revie w availabl e i nth e publi c docke t a t promulgation
. • Recommen dgroupin g high-strengt h application s wit hcorrosion-resistan t operations
. Response: Today' s proposa l include s thi s provision
. Detaile dinformatio no n al l thes e recommendation s i s containe di nth e pane l repor t

i n th e docke t

fo r thi s propose drule
. G. National

Technology Transfer

and Advancement

Act Sectio n 12(d ) ofth e Nationa l Technolog y Transfe r

an dAdvancemen t Ac t (NTTAA ) o f

199 5 (Publi c La w No
. 104-113 ; 1 5 U.S.C
. 27 2 note ) direct s EP A t o us e voluntar y consensu s standard s i nthei r

regulator y an d procuremen t

activitie s unles s t o d o s o woul db e inconsisten t

wit happlicabl e la w o r otherwis e impractical
. Voluntar y consensu s standard s ar e technica l standard s (e.g. , material s specifications , tes t methods , samplin g procedures , busines s practices ) develope do r adopte db y on e o r

mor e voluntar y consensu s bodies
. Th e NTTA A direct s EP A t o provid e Congress , throug h annua l report s t o OMB , wit h explanation s whe n a n agenc y doe s no t us e availabl e an dapplicabl e voluntar y consensu s standards
. Thi s propose drulemakin g involve s technica l standards
. Th e EP A propose s i n thi s rul e t o us e EP A Method s 1 , IA , 2 , 2A , 2C , 2D , 2F , 2G , 3 , 3A , 3B , 4,18 , 25 , 25A , 204 , an d204B , C , D , E
.

### 4034 4 Federal Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s Consisten t

witi i th e NTTAA , th e EP A conducte dsearche s t o identify voluntar y consensu s standard s i n additio nt o thes e EP A methods
. On e voluntar y consensu s standar dwa s identifie da s applicabl e an dEP A propose s t o us e thi s standar di nthi s propose drule
. Th e on e consensu s standard , AST M D6420-99 , Standar dTes t Metho dfo r Determinatio no f

Gaseou s Organi c Compound s b y Direc t

Interfac e Ga s Chromatography-Mas s Spectrometr y (GC/MS) , i s appropriat e i nth e case s describe dbelo w fo r

inclusio ni nthi s propose drul e i nadditio nt o th e currentl y availabl e EP A Metho d1 8 codifie da t

4 0 CF Rpar t

60 , appendi x A
. Simila r t o EPA' s performanc e base d Metho d18 , AST M D6420-9 9 i s als o a performanc e base dmetho dfo r measuremen t

o f gaseou s organi c compounds
. However , AST M D6420-9 9 wa s writte nt o suppor t th e specifi c us e o f highl y portabl e an dautomate dGC / MS
. Whil e offerin g advantage s ove r th e traditiona l Metho d18 , th e AST M metho ddoe s allo w som e les s stringen t criteri afo r

acceptin g GC/M S result s tha nrequire db y Metho d18
. Therefore , AST M D6420-9 9 i s asuitabl e alternativ e t o Metho d1 8 where : (1 ) Th e targe t compound(s ) ar e thos e liste di n Sectio n1. 1 o f

AST M D6420-99 , an d(2 ) th e targe t

concentratio ni s betwee n15 0 part s pe r billio n(volume ) an d10 0 ppm(v)
. Fo r targe t compound(s ) no t

liste di n Tabl e 1. 1 o f

ASTMD6420-99 , bu t potentiall y detecte db y mas s spectrometry , th e regulatio nspecifie s tha t th e additiona l syste mcontinuin g calibratio nchec k

afte r eac hrun , a s detaile di nsectio n10.5. 3 o f th e AST M method , mus t

b e followed , met , documented , an dsubmitte dwit hth e dat arepor t

eve ni f ther e i s n o moistur e condense r

use do r th e compoun di s no t considere dwate r

soluble
. Fo r targe t compound(s ) no t

liste di n Tabl e 1. 1 o f

AST M D6420-99 , an dno t amenabl e t o detectio nb y mas s spectrometry , AST M D6420-9 9 doe s no t 

### appfy

A s aresult , EP A propose s t o incorporat e b y referenc e (IBR) AST M 6420-9 9 int o 4 0 CF R63.1 4 fo r applicatio nwit hpropose dsubpar t WWW Wo f

par t 63
. Th e EP A wil l als o cit e Metho d1 8 a s aga s chromatograph y (GC ) optio ni nadditio nt o AST M D6420-99
. Thi s wil l allo w th e continue dus e o f

othe r G C configurations
. I nadditio nt o th e voluntar y consensu s standard s EP A propose s t o us e i nthi s propose drule , th e searc hfo r emission s monitorin g procedure s identifie d1 7 othe r

voluntar y consensu s standards
. Th e EP A determine dtha t 1 3 o f thes e 1 7 standard s identifie dfo r measurin g emission s o f th e HA Po r surrogate s subjec t

t o emissio n standard s i nth e propose drul e woul dno t b e practica l du e t o lac k

o f equivalency , detail , and/o r

qualit y assurance/qualit y contro l requirements
. Th e remainin g fou r ofth e 1 7 consensu s standard s identifie dar e unde r

developmen t

o r unde r EP A review
. Therefore , w e d o no t propos e t o us e thes e voluntar y consensu s standard s i n thi s propose d rulemaking
. Mor e informatio no n th e reason s w e chos e no t

t o propos e t o us e thes e standard s i s availabl e i nth e docke t fo r thi s propose drule
. Th e EP A take s comment s o n propose d complianc e demonstratio n requirement s i nthi s propose drulemakin g an d specificall y invite s th e publi c t o identif y potentiall y applicabl e voluntar y consensu s standards
. Commentor s shoul dals o explai n whythi s propose d rul e shoul dadop t

thes e voluntar y consensu s standard s i nlie u o f o r i n additio nt o EPA' s methods
. Emissio n tes t method s an dperformanc e specification s submitte dfo r evaluatio n shoul db e accompanie dwit habasi s fo r th e recommendation , includin g metho d validatio n dat aan dth e procedur e use d t o validat e th e candidat e metho d(i f metho dothe r

tha nMetho d301 , 4 0 CF R par t 63 , appendi x A wa s used)
. Tabl e 6 o f

propose dsubpar t

WWW W list s th e EP A tes t

method s an d performanc e standards
. Mos t o f th e standard s hav e bee nuse db y State s an d industr y fo r

mor e tha n 1 0 years . Nevertheless , unde r

§ 63.7(f) , th e proposa l als o allow s an y Stat e o r sourc e t o appl y t o EP A fo r

permissio n t o us e a nalternativ e method s i n plac e o f an y o f di e EP A testin g method s o r performanc e standard s liste di nth e propose dNESHAP
. H. Executive Order

13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and

Safety Risks Executiv e Orde r

1304 5 (6 2 F R19885 , Apri l 23,1997 ) applie s t o an y rul e that : (1 ) I s determine dt o b e "economicall y significant " a s define dunde r Executiv e Orde r 12866 , an d(2 ) concern s a n environmenta l healt ho r safet y ris k

tha t w e hav e reaso n t o believ e ma y hav e a disproportionat e effec t o n children
. If th e regulator y actio n meet s bot hcriteria , th e Agenc y mus t

evaluat e th e environmenta l healt ho r safet y effect s o f th e planne drul e o n children , an d explai nwh y th e planne dregulatio n i s preferabl e t o othe r

potentiall y effectiv e an dreasonabl y feasibl e alternative s considere db y th e Agency
. Th e EP A interpret s Executiv e Orde r 1304 5 a s applyin g onl y t o thos e regulator y action s tha t ar e base do n healt ho r safet y risks , suc htha t

th e analysi s require dunde r sectio n5-50 1 o f th e Executiv e Orde r

ha s th e potentia l t o influenc e th e regulation
. Thi s proposa l i s no t subjec t t o Executiv e Orde r

1304 5 becaus e i t

i s base do n technolog y performanc e an dno t

o nhealt ho r

safet y risks
. Lis to f Subject s i n 4 0 CFRPar t6 3 Environmenta l protection , Ai r pollutio n control , Hazardou s ai r pollutants , Incorporatio nb y reference , Reportin g an drecordkeepin g requirements , Volatil e organi c compounds
. Dated : Jun e 22 , 2001
. Christin e Tod dWhitman , Administrator
. Fo r th e reason s state di nth e preamble , title 40 , chapte r I , par t 6 3 o f th e Cod e o f

th e Federa l Regulation s i s propose dt o b e amende da s follows:
. PAR T63—[AMENDED ] 1
. Th e authorit y citatio n fo r par t 6 3 continue s t o rea da s follows : . Authority : 4 2 U.S. & 740 1 et seq. 2
. Sectio n63.1 4 i s propose dt o b e amende db y addin g paragrap h(b)(21 ) t o rea da s follows : §63.1 4 Incorporation' s b yreferenc e * * * * * (b) * * * (21 ) AST M D6420-99 , Standar dTes t Metho dfo r

Determinatio n o f

Gaseou s Organi c compound s b y Direc t Interfac e Ga s Chromatography-Mas s spectrometry , IB Rapprove dfo r §63.579 8 an d§63.5850
. **** * 3
. Par t 6 3 i s propose dt o b e amende d b y addin g subpar t

WWW Wt o rea da s follows : Subpart WWWW—Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Productio n Sec

. What Thi s Subpar t

Cover s 63.578 0 Wha

t i s th e purpos e o

f thi s subpart ? 63.578 5 A

mI subjec t

t o dii s subpart ? 63.579 0 What

part s o f m y plan t doe s tiiis subpart cover ? 63.579 5 Ho w d o I kno w i f m y reinforce d plasti c composite s productio n facilit y i s ane w affectedsourc e or

a nexistin g affecte dsource ? 63.579 7 Wha

t are model poin t

value s an d ho w are the y use di n thi s subpart ? 63.579 8 Ho w d o I determin e m y facility' s HA Pemission s o naton s pe r yea r (tpy ) basis ?P.2 4



### Federal Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4034 5 63.580 0 Whe nd o I hav e to compl y with thi s subpart ? Standard s 63.580 5 Wha

t standard s mus t

I mee t t o

- compl y wit

hthi s subpart ? Options forMeeting Standard s 63.581 0 Wha

t are m y option s fo

r meetin g th e standard s fo

r ne w an dexistin g ope n • moldin g an dcentrifugal castin g operations ? 63.582 0 Wha

t are m y option s fo

r meetin g th e standard s fo

r continuou s lamination/ castin g operations ? 63.582 5 Wha

t are m y option s fo

r meetin g - th e standard s fo

r ne w pultrusio n operations ? 63.583 0 Wha

t ar e m y option s fo

r meetin g th e standard s fo

r existin g pultrusio n operations ? Genera l Compliance Requirement s 63.583 5 Wha

t are m y general requirement s fo r complyin g withthi s subpart ? Testing and Initial Compliance Requirement

s 63.584 0 B y wha t

dat e mus t

I conduc t a performanc e tes t

o r othe r initia l complianc e demonstration ? 63.584 5 Whe nmus t

I conduc t

subsequen t performanc e tests ? 63.585 0 Ho w do I conduc t performanc e tests , performanc e evaluations , an d desig nevaluations ? 63.585 5 Wha

t are my monito r

installatio n an doperatio nrequirements ? 63.586 0 Ho w d o I demonstrat e initia l complianc e witi i th e standards ? Additional Compliance Calculatio n Procedures fo

rContinuous Lamination / Castin g Operations 63.586 5 Wha

tdat amus t

I generat e to demonstrat e complianc e withth e standard s fo

r continuou s lamination' / castin g operations ? 63.587 0 Ho w d o I calculat e annua l uncontrolle dan dcontrolle demission s fro mmy wet-ou t

area(s j an dfro mmy oven(s) ? 63.587 5 Ho w do I determin e th e captur e • ' efficienc y o

f th e enclosur e o nm

y wet
ou t are aan ddi e captur e efficienc y o f m y oven(s) ? 63.588 0 Ho w d o I determin e ho w muc h nea t resi nplu s i s applie dt o di e lin e an d ho w muc hnea t

gel coa t plu s i s applie d t o th e line ? 63.588 5 Ho w d o I calculat e percen t reductio nt o demonstrat e compliance ? 63.589 0 Ho w d o I calculat e anemissio n factor t o demonstrat e compliance ? Continuous Compliance Requirement s 63.589 5 Ho w d o I monito r an dcollec t

dat a t o demonstrat e continugu s compliance ? 63.590 0 Ho w do I demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wid i di e standards ? Notifications , Reports , an d Record s 63.590 5 Wha

t notification s mus t

I submi t an dwhen ? 63.591 0 Wha

t report s mus t

I submi t an d when ? 63.591 5 Wha

t record s mus t

I keep ? 63.592 0 Inwha t for man dho w lon g mus t

I keep m y records ? Othe rRequirement

s and Information 63.592 5 Wha

t part s o f th e General Provision s appl y t o me ? 63.593 0 Wh o implement s an denforce s thi s subpart ? 63.593 5 Wha

t definition s appl y t

qthi s subpart ? Table s t o Subpar tWWW W of Par t63 tabl e 1 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Mode l Equation s t o Calculat e Poin t Value s fo rSpecifi cOpe n Moldin g an d Centrifuga l Castin g Proces s Stream s Tabl e 2 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Complianc e Date s fo rNe wan d Existin g Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s Facilitie s Tabl e 3 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Emissio n Limit s fo rExistin g Smal l Busines s Source s Emittin g Less-Tha n 25 0 TPY o f

HAP , o rOthe rSource s Emittin g Les s Tha n 10 0 TPY o f HA P Tabl e 4 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Wor kPractic e Standard s Tabl e 5 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Alternativ e Emissio n Limit s fo rOpe n Moldin g an d Centrifuga l Castin g Operation s Wher e th e Standar d I s Base d o n aPercen tReductio n Requiremen t Tabl e 6 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Basi cRequirement s fo rPerformanc e Tests , Performanc e Evaluations , an d Desig n Evaluation s fo rNe wan d Existin g Source s Usin g Add-O n Contro l Device s Tabl e 7 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Option s Allowin g Us e o f th e Sam e Resi n Acros s Differen tOperation s Tha tUs e th e Sam e Resi n Typ e Tabl e 8 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Initia l Complianc e Wit h Emissio n Limit s Tabl e 9 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part63 — Initia l Complianc e Wit h Work Practic e Standard s fo rExistin g Tabl e 1 0 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part 63—Dat aRequirement s fo rNe wan d Existin g Continuou s Laminatio n Line s an d Continuou s Castin g Line s Complyin g wit h aPercen tReductio n Limi to n aPe rLin e Basi s Tabl e 1 1 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part 63—Dat aRequirement s fo rNe w an d Existin g Continuou s Laminatio n an d Continuou s Castin g Line s Complyin g wit h aPercen tReductio n Limi to ra Lbs/To n Limi to n a n Averagin g Basi s Tabl e 1 2 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part 63—Dat aRequirement s fo rNe wan d Existin g Continuou s Laminatio n Line s an d Continuou s Castin g Line s Complyin g wit h aLbs/To n o n aPe r 0 Lin e Basi s Tabl e 1 3 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part 63—Applicabilit y an d Timin g o f Notification s Tabl e 1 4 t o Subpar tWWWW o f Part 63—Requirement s fo rReport s Tabl e 1 5 t o Subpar tWWW W o f Part 63—Applicabilit y o f

Genera l Provision s (Subpar tA ) t o Subpar t WWWW o f

Part6 3 Wha tThi s Subpar tCover s § 63.578 0 Wha t i s th e purpos e o fthi s subpart ? Thi s subpar testablishe s nationa l emissio n standard s fo rhazardou s ai r pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo rreinforce d plasti ccomposite s production . Thi s subpar tals o establishe s requirement s t o demonstrat e initia l an d continuou s complianc e wit h th e emissio n standards . § 63.578 5 A m I subjec t t o thi s subpart ? Yo u ar e subjec tt o thi s subpar ti f yo u ow n o roperat e areinforce d plasti c composite s productio n facilit y tha ti s locate d atamajo rsourc e o f hazardou s ai rpollutant s (HAP ) emissions . Reinforce d plasti ccomposite s productio n consist s o f

operation s i n whic h reinforce d and/o rnonreinforce d plasti ccomposite s o rplasti cmoldin g compound s ar e manufactured . Thes e operation s us e thermose tresin s and/o r ge l coat s tha tcontai n styren e and/o r methy l methacrylat e t o produc e plasti c composites , whic h contai n material s designe d t o enhanc e th e chemical , physical , and/o rtherma l propertie s o f th e product . Reinforce d plasti c composite s productio n als o include s cleaning , mixing , an d materia l storag e associate d wit h th e productio n o f plasti ccomposites . Facilitie s tha tonl y repai rpreviousl y manufacture d reinforce d plasti ccomposite s ar e no t covere d b y thi s subpart . § 63.579 0 Wha t part s of m y plan t doe s thi s subpart cover ? (a ) Thi s subpar tapplie s t o eac h ne w o rexistin g affecte d sourc e a treinforce d plasti ccomposite s productio n facilities . (b ) Th e affecte d sourc e consist s o f al l part s o f you rfacilit y engage d i n th e followin g operations : Ope n molding , close d molding , centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination , continuou s casting , polyme rcasting , pultrusion , shee tmoldin g compoun d (SMC ) manufacturing , bul kmoldin g compoun d (BMC ) manufacturing , mixing , cleanin g o f equipmen tuse d i n reinforce d plasti c composite s manufacture , materia l storage , an y othe rplasti ccomposite s operations . §63.579 5 Howd o I knowi f m y reinforce d plasti c composite s productio n facilit y I s a newaffecte d sourc e o r a n existin g affecte d source ? (a) A reinforce d plasti ccomposite s productio n facilit y i s ane waffecte d

### 4034 6 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /

Propose dRule s
sourc e if i t meet s al l th e criteri ai n paragraph s (a)(1 ) an d(2

) o f thi s section
. (1 ) You commenc e constructio no f th e affecte dsourc e afte

r Augus t 2 , 2001
. (2) Whe n yo u commenc e construction , n o othe r

reinforce dplasti c composite s productio naffecte dsourc e exist s at tha t site
. (b) Fo r th e purpose s o

f thi s subpart , a n existin g affecte dsourc e i s an y affecte dsourc e tha t

i s no t ane w affecte d source . § 63.579 7 Wha t ar e mode l poin t value s an d ho war e the y use d i n thi s subpart ? 

### Th e mode l poin t

valu e i s anumbe r calculate dusin g th e equation s i nTabl e 1 t o thi s subpart
. Equation s are availabl e fo r eac hope n moldin g operatio nan d centrifugal castin g operation
. Th e mode l poin t value s hav e unit s of

pound s (lbs ) o f HAPpe r to n o f resi no r ge l coat applied
. Poin t

value s ar e use di nthi s subpar t t o determin e complianc e wit h certai nemissio nlimit s i nTable s 3 an d 5 o f thi s subpart
. Th e mode l poin t value s are surrogate s fo

r emissions , an d th e mode l poin t

valu e equation s ar e use donl y fo

r determinin g complianc e wit hthi s subpart
. Th e mode l poin t valu e equation s canno t

b e use di n plac e o f emissio nfacto r

equation s t o demonstrat e complianc e wit hothe r regulations
. § 63.579 8 Howd o I determin e m y facility' s HA P emission s o n a ton s pe r yea r (tpy ) basis ? 

### T o determin e you r

facility' s HAP emissions , yo u mus t

us e th e procedure s i n eithe r paragrap h(a

) or (b) o f thi s sectio nan dcalculat e th e combine dHAP emission s i ntp y fromth e followin g operations : Ope nmolding , centrifugal casting , continuou s lamination , continuou s casting , pultrusion , shee t moldin g compoun dmanufacturing , mixing , an dbul k

moldin g compoun d manufacturing
. (a ) Fo r existin g facilities , yo u ma y us e th e procedure s i neithe r

paragrap h(a)(1 ) or (2 ) o f thi s section
. (1 ) Use point

value equations or emission factors. Calculat e aweighte d averag e emissio nfactor

o nalbs/to nof resi n an dge l coat

basis
. Bas e th e weighte daverag e o nth e 1 2 month s o f operatio n prio r

t o th e effectiv e dat e o

f thi s subpart
. Multipl y th e weighte d averag e emissio nfactor

b y resi nan dgel coa t us e ove r th e sam e period
. Yo u ma y calculat e thi s emissio nfactor basedo n th e poin t valu e equation s i nTabl e 1 o f thi s subpart , or

yo u may us e an y emissio nfactor

approve db y u s suc ha s factor s fromth e Compilatio no f Ai r Pollutan t Emissio nFactors , Volum e I : Stationary Poin t

an dAre aSource s (AP

42)
. Thi s calculatio nmus t b e repeate d an dreporte dannually
. (2) Conduct performance testing. Perfor mperformanc e testin g usin g th e method s specifie di nthi s subpar t t o determin e afacility-specifi c emissio n factor i nlb s o f HAPemission s pe r

to n o f resi nan dgel coat

used
. Th e tes t shoul db e performe dunde r condition s expecte dt o resul t

i nth e highes t possibl e HA

Pemissions , or

th e facilit

y mus t stay withi n1 0 percen t

ofth e sam e mi x o f operation s tha t

occurre ddurin g testing
. Multipl y thi s facto r b y annua l resi nan dge l coat

us e t o determin e annua l emissions
. (b) Fo r ne w facilities , calculat e a weighte daverag e emissio nfacto r o na lbs/to n o f resi nan dge l coat

basis
. Bas e th e weighte daverag e o nyou r projecte d operatio nfo

r th e 1 2 month s subsequen t t o facility startup . Multipl y th e weighte daverag e emissio nfacto r b y projecte dresi nus e over

th e sam e period
. You may calculat e thi s emissio n factor basedo nth e poin t

valu e equation s i nTabl e 1 o

f thi s subpart , o r yo u may us e an y emissio nfactor approve db y us , suc ha s factor s from AP-42 , or

emissio ntes t

dat afrom similar facilities
. Thi s calculatio nmus t b e repeate dan dreporte dannually
. § 63.580 0 Whe n d o I hav e t o compl y wit h thi s subpart ? 

### (a ) Yo u mus t

initiall y compl y wit hth e standard s i nthi s subpar t

b y th e date s specifie di nTabl e 2 t o thi s subpart
. Facilitie s meetin g a nemission s standar d base do na12-mont

hrollin g averag e mus t begi ncollectin g dat ao nth e complianc e dat e i norde r t o demonstrat e compliance. ; (b ) I f you r facility i s ane w affecte d sourc e an demit s les s tha n10 0 tp y o f HAPat th e tim e o

f initia l complianc e wit hthi s subpart , an dsubsequentl y increase s it s actua l HAPemission s t o 10 0 tp y o r more , the nyou r

facility mus t subsequenti y mee t

th e standard s i n § 63.5805(d)
. Yo u mus t

b e i n- complianc e wit hthes e mor e stringen t standard s withi n3 year s o f the.dat e you r facilit y meet s or

exceed s th e 10 0 tp y threshold
. (c ) I f you r facility i s a nexistin g affecte dsourc e an demit s les s tha n25 0 tp y o f HAP(i f yo u ar e asmal l business ) or les s tha n10 0 tp y o

f HAP(i f yo u are no t asmal l business ) at

th e time o

f initia l complianc e wit hthi s subpart , an dsubsequenti y increase s it s actua l HAPemission s t o 25 0 tp y o r mor e (smal l business ) or

t o 10 0 tp y o r

mor e (non-smal l business) , the nyou r facilit y mus t subsequentl y mee t

th e standard s at § 63.5805(b)
. You mus t

b e i n complianc e wit hthes e mor e stringen t „ standard s withi n3 year s o f th e dat e you r facilit y meet s or

exceed s th e 25 0 tp y o r 10 0 tp y threshold
. Standard s § 63.580 5 Wha t standard s mus t I mee t t o compl y wit h thi s subpart ? 

### Al l facilitie s mus t

mee t th e requirement s of

paragraph s (a

) throug h (f ) o f thi s sectio ntha t

apply
. Ther e ar e option s t o meetin g thes e standard s describe di n§ § 63.581 0 throug h 63.5830
. (a ) I f yo u hav e a nexistin g facility tha t i s asmal l business , a s define db y di e Smal l Busines s Administration' s (SBA's ) regulation s at

1 3 CF R121.201 , an demit s les s tha n25 0 tp y o f HAP , o r afacilit y tha t i s no t asmal l busines s an d tiiat emit s les s tha n10 0 tp y o f HAPfrom th e combinatio no

f al l ope nmolding , centrifugal casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dmixing/BM C manufacturing , yo u mus t mee t th e annua l averag e emissio nlimit s i nTabl e 3 o f tiiis subpar t

an dth e wor

k practic e standard s i nTabl e 4 o

f thi s subpar t

dia t appl y t o you . (b) I f yo u hav e anexistin g facilit y tha t i s asmal l busines s a s define db y th e SB A regulation s at

1 3 CF R121.20 1 an d emit s 25 0 tp y or

mor e o f EHAP , or i f yo u hav e afacilit

y tha t i s no t asmal l busines s an demit s 10 0 tp y or mor e of HAPfromth e combinatio no f al l ope n molding , centrifuga l casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dmixing/BM C manufacturin g operations , yo u mus t reduc e th e tota l HAPemission s from thes e operation s b y at

leas t 9 5 percen t b y weigh t an dmee t an y applicabl e work practic e standard s i nTabl e 4 o f thi s subpar t tha t appl y t o you . A s a n alternativ e t o meetin g 9 5 percen t b y weight , yo u may mee t

th e emissio n limit s i nTabl e 5 o

f thi s subpart
. I

f yo u hav e acontinuou s lamination/castin g operation , tiiat

operatio nma y alternativel y mee t

a nemissio nlimi t

o f 1.4 7 lb s o f HA Ppe r to no f nea t resi n plu s an dnea t

ge l coat plu s applied
. (c ) I f yo u hav e ane w facility tha t emit s les s tha n10 0 tp y o f HAPfromth e combinatio no

f al l ope nmolding , centrifugal casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dmixing/BM C manufacturing , yo u mus t mee t th e annua l averag e emission.limit s i nTabl e 3 o f thi s subpar t

an dth e work

practic e standard s i nTabl e 4 o

f thi s subpar t

tha t appl y t o you . ^ (d)I f yo u hav e ane w facility tha t emit s 10 0 tp y or

mor e o f HAPfromth e combinatio no

f al l ope nmolding , centrifugal casting , continuou s lamination/casting , pultrusion , SM C manufacturing , an dmixing/BM C manufacturing , yo u mus t reduc e th e tota l HA Pemission s fro mthes eP.2 6

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4034 7 operation s b y a t

leas t 9 5 percen t

b y weight.an dmee t

an y applicabl e wor k practic e standard s i nTabl e . 4 o f thi s subpar t tha t appl y t o you . A s a n alternativ e t o meetin g 9 5 percen t b y weight , yo u ma y mee t

th e emissio n limit s i nTabl e 5 o f

thi s subpart
. I f

yo u hav e acontinuou s lamination/castin g operation , tha t

operatio nma y alternativel y mee t

a nemissio nlimi t

o f 1.4 7 lb s o f

HA Ppe r

to no f nea t resi n plu s an dnea t

ge l coa t plu s applied
. (e ) If yo u us e a nadd-o ncontro l devic e t o compl y wit hthi s subpart , yo u mus t mee t al l requirement s containe di n 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

SS
. Option s fo rMeetin g Standard s § 63.581 0 Wha t ar e m y option s fo r meetin g th e standard s fo r newan d existin g ope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g operations ? Yo u mus t

us e on e o f

th e followin g method s i nparagraph s (a ) throug h(c ) o f thi s sectio nt o mee t

th e standard s i n § 63.5805
. Th e necessar y calculation s mus t b e complete dwithi n3 0 day s afte r . th e en do f

th e eac hmonth
. (a ) Meet the individual

model point values for

each operation. Demonstrat e tha t yo u mee t

th e individua l mode l poin t value s fo r

eac hope nmoldin g operatio n an dfo r

eac hcentrifuga l castin g operatio n i n Tabl e 3 o r 5 o f thi s subpar t tha t appl y t o you . Thi s i s don e i ntw o steps . First , determin e apoin t valu e fo r eac hindividua l resi n an dge l coat , applicatio n method , an dcontro l metho dyo u us e i n aparticula r operation
. Then , calculat e aweighte d averag e o f

.thos e poin t

value s base do n resi nan dge l coa t

use . Thes e calculation s shal l b e performe d monthly , an dwithi n 3 0 day s o f th e en d o f th e month
. Yo u mus t

eitiie r b e a t o r belo w th e applicabl e poin t valu e i n Tabl e 3 o r

5 o f thi s subpar t

eac hmonth , o r a t o r belo w th e applicabl e poin t valu e i nTabl e 3 o r

5 o f thi s subpart , base do n a12-mont hrollin g average . Th e procedure s ar e describe di n paragraph s (a)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f

thi s section
. (1 ) Calculat e you r

actua l poin t

value s fo r eac hdifferen t

proces s strea mwithi n eac hoperation
. Proces s stream s withi n operation s ar e differen t fro meac hothe r i f

an y o f th e followin g thre e characteristic s vary : Th e nea t resi n plu s o r nea t ge l coa t plu s HA Pcontent , th e applicatio ntechnique , o r th e contro l technique
. Yo u mus t

calculat e th e differen t proces s strea mpoin t

value s b y usin g th e appropriat e mode l poin t valu e equation s i nTabl e 1 o f thi s subpar t

fo r ope nmoldin g an dfo r

centrifuga l casting
. I f yo u wan t

t o us e vapo r suppressant s t o mee t

th e poin t

valu e fo r ope nmolding , yo u mus t determin e th e vapo r suppressan t

effectivenes s b y • conductin g testin g t o demonstrat e th e vapo r suppressan t

effectiveness
. I

f yo u wan t t o us e a n add-o n contro l devic e t o mee t th e poin t

value , yo u mus t determin e th e add-o n contro l facto r b y conductin g captur e an dcontro l efficienc y testin g a s indicate di nTabl e 6 o f thi s subpart
. Th e poin t valu e calculate dfromth e equation s i n Tabl e 1 o f thi s subpar t

i s multiplie db y th e add-o ncontro l facto r

t o calculat e th e poin t valu e afte r

control
. Us e Equatio n 1 o f thi s sectio nt o calculat e th e add-o n contro l facto r

use di n th e mode l poin t valu e equations
.
Add-o nContro l Facto r

= 1 - . % Contro l Efficienc y

10 0 (Eq
. 1 )

Where: %Contro l Efficienc y = avalu e calculate d fromemissio ntes t

measurement s mad e accordin g t o th e requirement s o f Tabl e 6 o f thi s subpart (2 ) Calculat e you r

actua l operatio n poin t valu e fo r

eac hcalenda r

mont hfb r eac hope nmoldin g operatio nan dfo r eac hcentrifuga l castin g operatio nb y calculatin g th e weighte daverag e o f th e individua l proces s strea mpoin t values , withi neac hrespectiv e operation
. T o d o this , su mth e produc t

o f you r actua l proces s strea mpoin t

value s an dth e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s an dnea t

ge l coa t plu s use di neac hproces s strea m an ddivid e th e numerato r b y th e tota l amoun t o f nea t resi nplu s an dnea t

ge l coa t plu s use di nth e proces s streams . Us e Equatio n 2 o f

thi s sectio n t o calculat e you r

actua l individua l poin t valu e fo r eac hoperation
.

Y (Actua l Proces s Strea mP V * Material, ) Actua l *->r Operatio n= J2 i (Eq
. 2 ) Poin t Valu e £Material , i= l Where: Actual Proces s StreamPV i = actua l poin t valu e fromproces s streami , lbs/to n Material i = nea t

resi nplu s o r

nea t ge l coat plu s use ddurin g di e calendar monthfo r proces s streami , ton s n= numbe r

o f proces s stream s wher e yo u calculate dapoin t

valu e (b ) Point value averaging option. Demonstrat e eac hmont htha t yo u mee t th e weighte daverag e poin t valu e ofth e ope nmoldin g operation s an dth e

weighte daverag e poin t valu e o f th e centrifuga l castin g operation s i nTabl e 3 o r 5 o f tiiis subpar t

tha t appl y t o you . Whe nusin g thi s averagin g option , d o no t appl y th e procedure s acros s ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g operations
. (1 ) Eac hmont hcalculat e th e weighte d averag e poin t

valu e fo r

you r facilit y fo r tha t mont ht o determin e whic hpoin t valu e yo u mus t meet . T o d o this , yo u mus t su mth e produc t

o f th e individua l poin t value s i n Tabl e 3 o r

5 o f thi s subpart , an dth e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s o r nea t ge l coa t plu s use di neac h operatio n an ddivid e th e numerato r b y th e tota l amoun t

o f nea t resi nplu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s use di nth e operation
. Us e Equatio n 3 o f

thi s sectio nt o calculat e th e weighte daverag e poin t value
.41034 8 Federal * Registe r/Vol
. 66 , No:-149/Thursday^ , Augus t 2-, ) 2064 / Proposed ' Rule s
X ( P V i * Material; ) Weighte dAverag e Poin t Valu e = —— - (Eq
. 3 )

^Material ; i= l ' VWiere : PV i = poin t valu e fromoperatio ni , lbs/to n fro mTabl e 3 o r

5 o f thi s subpart Material i = nea t

resi nplu s o r

neat ge l coat plu s use ddurin g th e calendar mont hfo r operatio ni , ton s n= numbe r

o f operation s (2 ) Eac hmont hcalculat e you r actua l weighte daverag e poin t value
. D o thi s b y summin g th e produc t

o f you r actua l operatio npoin t

value s an dth e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s an dnea t

ge l coa t plu s use di neac hoperatio n an ddividin g th e numerato r

b y th e tota l amoun t

o f nea t resi nplu s an dnea t

ge l coa t plu s use d i nth e operatio n groupings
. Yo u mus t

calculat e you r

actua l individua l poin t value s fo r

eac hoperatio n a s describe d i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f thi s section
. Us e Equatio n 4 o f thi s sectio n t o calculat e you r

actua l weighte d averag e poin t

value
.

Actua l Y (Actua l Operatio nP V * Material: ) Weighte d& ra ^ Averag e = —5 : '
. " (Eq

- 4 ) Poin t Valu e £Material ; i= l VWiere.

- Actual Individua l PV

i = Actua l poin t

valu e fro moperatio ni , lbs/to n Material i = neat

resi nplu s or

nea t gel coat plu s use ddurin g th e calendar mont hfo r operatio ni , ton s n= numbe r

o f operation s (3 ) Calculat e a12-mont hweighte d averag e floo r

poin t valu e an dactua l poin t valu e b y summin g th e value s calculate di nparagraph s (b)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f thi s sectio nwit hth e value s calculate d i nth e previou s 1 1 month s an ddividin g th e resul t

b y 12
. If th e actua l valu e 12

- mont hrollin g averag e i s les s tha no r equa l t o th e floo r

12-mont hrollin g average , the nyo u ar e i ncompliance
. (c ) Select one resin point

value for multiple operations. If yo u hav e an y combinatio no f

manua l resi n application , mechanica l resi n application , filament

winding , o r centrifuga l casting , yo u ma y elec t t o mee t th e poin t

valu e fo r

an y on e o f thes e operation s an dus e tha t operation' s sam e resi ni nal l o f th e resi n operation s liste di nthi s paragrap h(c)
. If yo u selec t

thi s option , fo r

purpose s o f assignin g poin t

value s an ddeterminin g compliance , us e Tabl e 7 o f thi s subpar t whic hpresent s th e possibl e combination s base do nafacilit y selectin g th e applicatio nproces s tha t result s i nth e highes t

allowabl e EHA

P conten t resin
. Th e averagin g provision s i nparagrap h(b ) o f

thi s sectio nma y stil l b e used , bu t

yo u mus t

us e th e poin t value(s ) accordin g t o thi s paragrap h(c ) t o calculat e compliance
. § 63.582 0 Wha t ar e m y option s fo r meetin g th e standard s fo r continuou s lamination / castin g operations ? Yo u mus t

us e on e o r

mor e o f th e option s i n paragraph s (a ) throug h(d ) o f thi s sectio n t o mee t

th e standard s i n §63.5805
. Us e th e calculatio n procedure s i n § 63.5865
. (a ) Compliant

line option. Demonstrat e tha t

eac hcontinuou s laminatio n lin e an deac hcontinuou s castin g lin e complie s wit hth e applicabl e standard
. (b ) Averaging option. Demonstrat e tha t al l continuou s laminatio n an d continuou s castin g line s combine d compl y witi i th e applicabl e standard
. (c ) Add-on control

device option. If you r operatio nmus t

mee t th e 58. 5 weigh t percen t emissio n limi t

i nTabl e 3 o f tiiis subpart , yo u hav e th e optio n o f demonstratin g tha t

yo u achiev e 9 5 percen t contro l o f

al l wet-ou t

are a emissions
. (d ) Combination option. Us e a combinatio no f

option s i n paragraph s (a ) an d(b ) o f

thi s sectio n or , fo r

affecte d source s a t

existin g facilities , a combinatio no f

option s i n paragraph s (a) , (b) , an d(c ) o f

thi s sectio n (i n whic h on e o r mor e line s mee t

th e standard s o n thei r own , tw o o r

mor e line s average d togethe r mee t th e standards , an don e o r mor e line s hav e thei r

wet-ou t area s controlle dt o aleve l o f 9 5 percent)
. § 63.582 5 Wha t ar e m y option s fo r meetin g th e standard s fo r newpultrusio n operations ? Yo u mus t

us e on e o r

mor e o f th e option s i nparagraph s (a ) throug h(c ) o f thi s sectio nt o mee t

th e 9 5 percen t emissio nreductio n standar di n §63.5805
. (a ) Add-on control device option. Captur e th e emission s an dven t the mt o acontro l devic e o r

an y combinatio n o f contro l device s tha t

achieve s a9 5 percen t reductioii'o f

HA Pemissions
. Conduc t captur e an ddestructio n efficienc y testin g a s indicate di n Tabl e 6 o f thi s subpar t

t o determin e th e percen t emissio nreduction
. (b ) Direct die injection with resin drip collection option. Us e direc t di e injectio npultrusio nmachine s wit h resi ndri p collectio n system s tha t mee t th e followin g criteri ai n paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(3 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) Al l th e resi n tha t

i s applie dt o th e reinforcemen t

i s delivere ddirectl y t o th e die
. (2 ) N o expose dresi n i s presen t excep t a t th e fac e o f

th e die
. (3 ) Resi ndri p i s capture di n close d pipin g an drecycle ddirectl y t o th e resi n injectio nchamber
. (c ) Combination option. Us e a combinatio n o f

option s i nparagraph s (a ) an d(b ) o f

tiiis sectio ni n whic hsom e line s mee t

th e standard s b y complyin g wit hparagrap h(a ) o f

thi s section , an d th e remainin g line s mee t th e standard s b y complyin g wit hparagrap h(b ) o f thi s section
. § 63.583 0 Wha t ar e m y option s fo r meetin g th e standard s fo r existin g pultrusio n operations ? Yo u mus t

us e on e o r

mor e o f th e option s i nparagraph s (a ) throug h(d ) o f thi s sectio nt o mee t

th e 6 0 weigh t percen t emissio n limi t

i n Tabl e 3 o f

thi s subpar t a s require di n§ 63.5805
. (a ) Add-on control

device option. CaEptur e th e emission s an dven t the mt o acontro l devic e o r

an y combinatio n o f

. contro l device s tha t

achieve s a6 0P.2 8



### Federa l Registe r/

Vol;-66,_No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4034 9 weigh t percen t reductio n o

f HAP emissions
. Conduc t

captur e an d destructio nefficienc y testin g a s indicate di n Tabl e 6 o

f thi s subpart

t o determin e th e percen t

EHA Pemissio n reduction
. (b) Wet area enclosure with resin drip collection option. Design , install , an d operat e we t

are aenclosure s an dresi n dri p collectio nsystem s o npultrusio n machine s tha t

mee t th e criteri ai n paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(11 ) o f thi s section
. (1 ) Th e enclosur e mus t

cove r an d enclos e th e ope nresi nbathan dth e formin g area.in whic hreinforcement s

- are pre-we t

or wet-ou t an dmovin g

. towar dth e die(s)
. Th e surface s ofth e enclosur e mus t

b e close dexcep t

fo r openings t o allo w materia l t o ente r an d exi t th e enclosure
. (2) Fo r pultrusio nmachine s wit ha • iradi o frequency pre-hea t unit , th e enclosur e mus t

exten dfromth e beginnin g o

f th e resi nbat ht o withi n 12.5iinche s or

les s ofth e entranc e ofth e radi o frequency pre-heat

unit
. I f th e stoc k tha t i s withi n12. 5 inche s o r

les s ofth e entranc e t o th e radi o frequency pre-hea t uni t has'any'drip , i t

mus t b e enclosed
. Th e stoc k

exitin g th e radi o frequenc y pre-hea t

uni t i s no t require d to-b e i n a nenclosur e if

th e stoc k ha s n o dri p betwee n th e exi t

o f th e radi o frequenc y pre-hea t

uni t t o withi n0. 5 inche s o f th e entranc e o

f th e die
. (3 ) Fo r ope nbat hpultrusio nmachine s withou t aradi o frequency pre-hea t unit , th e enclosur e mus t

exten dfromth e beginnin g ofth e resi nbat ht o withi n0. 5 inche s o r les s ofth e di e entrance .

- (4 ) Fo r pultrusio nline s wit hapre-we t are aprio r f o direc t di e injection , th e enclosur e mus t

exten dfromth e poin t

at whic hth e resi n i s applie dt o th e reinforcemen t

t o withi n12. 5 inche s or les s o f th e entranc e of

th e die(s)
. I

f th e stoc k tha t i s withi n12. 5 inche s or

les s of th e entranc e t o th e di e ha s an y drip , i t mus t b e enclosed
. (5 ) Th e enclosur e ca nonl y b e constructe dhig henoug ht o clear th e highes t par t of th e pultrusio nlin e tha t mus t b e insid e th e enclosure
. (6 ) Th e tota l ope nare ad

f th e enclosur e mus t

no t excee d2 times th e cros s sectiona l are ao

f th e pulle r window(s ) an dmus t

compl y wit hth e requirement s i nparagraph s (b)(6)(i ) throug h(iii ) o

f thi s section
. (i ) Al l area s whic har e ope n nee dt o b e include di n th e tota l ope n are a calculatio n wit hth e exceptio no f acces s panels , doors , and/o r

hatche s tha t

ar e par t of th e enclosure
. (ii ) Th e are awhic hi s displace db y enterin g reinforcemen t

o r exitin g produc t i s considere dopen . (iii ) Area s tha t ar e covere db y brus h cover s ar e considere dclosed
. (7 ) Ope narea s fo

r leve l contro l devices , monitorin g devices , agitatio n shafts , and/o r

fill hose s mus t

hav e n o more tha n1. 0 inc hclearance
. (8 ) Th e acces s panels , doors , and/o r hatche s tha t

ar e par t ofth e enclosur e mus t clos e tightl y t o avoi dvapo r leakage
. Damage dacces s panels , doors , and/o r hatche s tha t

allo w vapo r

leakag e mus t b e replaced
. (9 ) Th e enclosur e may no t b e remove d fromth e pultrusio nlin e an dacces s panels , doors , and/o r

hatche s tha t

ar e par t o f th e enclosur e mus t

remai n close dwheneve r

resi ni s i nth e bat h excep t fo r th e tim e perio ddiscusse di n paragrap h(b)(10).o f

thi s section
. (10) Th e maximu mlengtho f time th e enclosure , may b e remove dfro mth e pultrusio nlin e or

th e acces s panels , doors , and/o r

hatche s an dmay beope n i s 3 0 minute s pe r

8 hou r shif t (o r 4 5 minute s pe r

1 2 hou r shift)
. (11 ) No fans , blowers , and/o r ai r line s may b e allowe dwithi nth e enclosure
. •Th e enclosur e mus t

noth e ventilated
. (c ) Direct die injection with resin drip collection option. Us e direc t di e injectio npultrusio nmachine s wit h resi ndripcollectio n system s tha t mee t al l th e criteri ai nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(3 ) o

f thi s section
. (1 ) Al l th e resi ntha t

i s applie dt o th e reinforcemen t

i s delivere ddirectl y t o th e die
. (2) No expose dresi ni s presen t excep t at th e fac e o

f the.die
. (3 ) Resi ndri p i s capture di nclose d -pipin g an drecycle ddirectl y t o th e resi n injectio nchamber
. [d}~Combination option. Us e a combinatio no

f option s i nparagraph s (a ) throug h(c ) o

f thi s sectio ni nwhic h different pultrusio nline s compl y wit h different option s describe di n paragraph s (a

) throug h(c ) of

thi s section
. 'General Complianc e Requirements § 63.583 5 Wha t ar e m y genera l requirement s fo r complyin g wit h thi s subpart ? 

### (a ) You mus t

b e i ncomplianc e at

al l time s wit hth e work

practic e standard s i nTabl e 4 of

thi s subpart , a s wel l a s emissio nlimit s i nTabl e 3 o r 5 o f thi s subpart , a s applicable , tha t yo u ar e meetin g withou t

th e us e of

add-o n controls
. (b ) You mus t

b e i ncomplianc e wit h al l emissio nlimit s i nthi s subpar t tha t yo u mee t usin g add-o ncontrols , excep t durin g period s o

f startup , shutdown , an dmalfunction
. (c) You mus t

alway s operat e an d maintai nyou r

affecte dsource , includin g ai r pollutio ncontro l an dmonitorin g equipment , accordin g t o th e provision s in§63.6(e)(l)(i)
. (d) yo u .mus t

develo p an dimplemen t awritte nstaErtup,
. shutdown , an d malfunctio npla naccordin g t o th e provision s i n§ 63.6(e)(3 ) fo r an y emissio nlimit s yo u mee t usin g anadd

o ncontrol
. Testin g an d Initial Complianc e Requirements § 63.584 0 B y wha t dat e mus t I conduc t a performanc e tes t o r othe r initia l complianc e demonstration ? 

### You mus t conduc t performanc e tests , performanc e evaluations , desig n evaluations , captur e efficienc y testing , an dothe r initia l complianc e demonstration s b y th e complianc e dat e specifie di nTabl e 2 o

f thi s subpar t

wit h tw o exceptions
. Ope nmoldin g an d centrifugal castin g operation s tha t elec t t o mee t apoin t valu e o na12-month rollin g averag e mus t

initiat e collectio n o f th e require ddat ao nth e complianc e date , an ddemonstrat e complianc e 1 year an d3 0 day s afte

r th e complianc e date
. Ne w an dexistin g source s tha t ar e require dt o us e add-o ncontrol s t o initiall y mee t

complianc e mus t demonstrat e complianc e 18 0 day s afte r th e complianc e date
. § 63.584 5 Whe n mus t I conduc t subsequen t performanc e tests ? 

### You mus t als o conduc t

aperformanc e tes t every 5 year s followin g th e initia l performanc e tes t

fo r an y standard s yo u mee t wit ha nadd-o ncontro l device
. §63.585 0 How.d o I conduc t performanc e -tests , performanc e evaluations , an d desig n evaluations ? 

### (a ) I f yo u ar e usin g an y add-o n control s t o mee t

anemissio nlimi t

i n thi s subpart , yo u mus t

conduc t eac h performanc e test , performanc e evaluation , an ddesig nevaluatio ni n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

SS , tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Eac hperformanc e tes t mus t b e conducte daccordin g t o th e requirement s i n§ 63.7(e)(1 ) an dunde r th e specifi c condition s tha t 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

SS , specifies
. (c ) Eac hperformanc e evaluatio nmus t b e conducte daccordin g t o th e requirement s i n§ 63.8(e ) an dunde r th e specifi c condition s tha t

4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t SS , specifies
.

. (d ) You ma

y no t conduc t performanc e test s o r performanc e evaluation s durin g .period s o f startup , shutdown , or malfunction , a s specifie di n§ 63.7(e)(1)
. (e) You mus t

conduc t thre e separat e • tes t run s fo r eac hperformanc e tes t require di nthi s section , a s specifie di n § 63.7(e)(3)
. Eac htes t

ru nmus t las t a t leas t 1 hour
.4035 0 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s (f ) Yo u mus t

conduc t adesig n evaluatio no f

an y permanen t

tota l
. enclosure s a s specifie db y EP A Metho d 204
. If you r enclosur e doe s no t

mee t th e Metho d20 4 desig nan doperatio n requirement s fo r

apermanen t

tota l enclosure , yo u mus t

tes t th e enclosur e t o determin e th e captur e efficienc y b y Method s 2 B throug hEo r a n alternativ e metho dtha t

meet s th e dat aqualit y objective s an dlowe r

confidenc e limi t approache s containe di n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t KK
. Tes t

run s fo r Method s 2 B throug hEo r

alternativ e tes t

method s mus t b e a t leas t 3 hours
. § 63.585 5 Wha t ar e m y monito r installatio n an d operatio n requirements ? Yo u mus t

monito r an doperat e al l add-o ncontro l device s accordin g t o th e procedure s i n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t SS
. §63.586 0 Howd o I demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit h th e standards ? (a ) Yo u mus t

demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit heac hemissio n standar di nparagraph s (a ) throug h(d ) o f § 63.580 5 tha t

applie s t o you , a s show n i nTable s 8 an d9 o f

thi s subpart
. (b ) If usin g a nadd-o ncontro l device , • yo u mus t

establis heac hsite-specifi c operatin g limi t

i n4 0 CF Rpar t

63 , subpar t SS , tha t applie s t o you . Additiona l Complianc e Calculatio n Procedure s Fo rContinuou s Lamination / Castin g Operation s § 63.586 5 Wha t dat a mus t I generat e t o demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e standard s fo r continuou s lamination/castin g operations ? (a ) Fo r continuou s lamination/castin g affecte dsource s complyin g wit ha percen t reductio nrequirement , yo u mus t generat e th e dat aidentifie di n Table s 1 0 an d1 1 o f

thi s subpar t

fo r eac h dat arequiremen t

tha t applie s t o you r facility
. (b ) Fo r continuou s lamination/castin g affecte dsource s complyin g wit halbs / to nlimit , yo u mus t

generat e th e dat a identifie di nTable s 1 1 an d1 2 o f thi s subpar t fo r eac hdat arequiremen t tha t applie s t o you r

facility
. § 63.587 0 Howd o I calculat e annua l uncontrolle d an d controlle d emission s fro m m y wet-ou t area(s ) an d fro m m y oven(s) ? T o calculat e you r

annua l uncontrolle d an dcontrolle demission s fromyou r wet
ou t area s an dfro myou r

ovens , yo u mus t develo p uncontrolle dan d controlle dwet-ou t

are aan d uncontrolle dan dcontrolle dove n emissio nestimatio nequation s o r factor s t o apply-t o eac hformul aapplie do n eac hline , determin e ho w muc ho f eac h formul afo r

eac hen dproduc t

i s applie d eac hyea r

o neac hline , an dassig n uncontrolle dan dcontrolle dwet-ou t are aan duncontrolle dan dcontrolle d ove nemissio nestimatio nequation s o r factor s t o eac hformula
. Yo u mus t determin e th e overal l captur e efficienc y usin g th e procedure s i n Tabl e 6 o f thi s subpart
. (a ) T o develo p uncontrolle dan d controlle demissio n estimatio n equation s an dfactors , yo u must , a t minimum , d o th e followin g a s specifie d i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(6 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Identif

y eac hen dproduc t

an dth e thicknes s o f

eac hen dproduc t

produce d o nth e line
. Separat e en dproduct s int o th e followin g en dproduc t groupings , a s applicable : corrosion-resistan t ge l coate den dproducts , noncorrosion

resistan t ge l coate den dproducts , corrosion-resistan t

nonge l coate den d products , an dnoncorrosion-resistan t nonge l coate den dproducts
. Thi s ste p create s en dproduct/thicknes s combinations
. (2 ) Identif

y eac hformul ause do n th e lin e t o produc e eac hen dproduct / thicknes s combination
. Identif y th e amoun t o f eac hsuc hformul aapplie d (nee dt o specif

y atim e frame). Ran k eac hformul ause dt o produc e eac hen d product/thicknes s combinatio n accordin g t o usag e withi n eac hen d product/thicknes s combination
. (3 ) Fo r eac hen dproduct/thicknes s • combinatio n bein g produced , selec t th e formul awit hth e highes t usag e rat e fo r testing
. (4 ) I f no t alread y selected , als o selec t th e worst-cas e formul a(likel y t o b e associate dwit hth e formul awit hth e highes t HA Pcontent , typ e o f

HAP , applicatio no f

ge l coat , thi nproduct , lo w lin e speed , highe r

resi ntabl e temperature ) amongs t

al l formulae
. (Yo u ma y us e th e result s o f

th e worst-cas e formul ates t

fo r al l formula e i f

desire d t o limi t th e amoun t

o f testin g required. ) (5 ) Fo r each'fonriul aselecte dfo r testmg , conduc t

a t leas t on e tes t (consistin g o f

thre e runs)
. Durin g th e test , trac k

informatio n o n HA Pconten t an dtyp e o f

HAP , en dproduc t

thickness , lin e speed , an dresi n temperatur e o n th e wet-ou t are atable
. (6 ) Usin g th e tes t

results , develo p uncontrolle dan dcontrolle demissio n estimatio n equation s (o r factors ) o r serie s o f equation s (o r

factors ) tha t

bes t fi t th e result s fo r

estimatin g uncontrolle dan dcontrolle demissions , takin g int o accoun t

th e HA Pconten t an dtyp e o f

HAP , en dproduc t

thickness , lin e speed , an dresi ntemperatur e o nth e wet-ou t are atable
. (b ) I nlie u o f

usin g th e metho d specifie di nparagrap h(a) o f thi s sectio n fo r developin g uncontrolle dan d controlle demissio n estimatio n equation s an dfactors , yo u ma y us e an y o f th e method s specifie di n paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s section , a s applicable
. (1 ) Fo r eithe r uncontrolle do r controlle demissio n estimates , yo u ma y us e previousl y established , facility

specifi c emissio nequation s o r factors , provide dthe y allo w estimatio no f bot h wet-ou t are aan dove nemissions , wher e necessary , an dhav e bee napprove db y th e regulator y agency . If apreviousl y establishe dequatio no r facto r i s specifi c t o th e wet-ou t

are aonl y o r

t o th e ove n only , the nyo u mus t

develo p th e correspondin g uncontrolle do r controlle dequatio n o r

facto r fo r th e othe r emissio nsource . (2 ) Fo r uncontrolle d(controlled ) emissio n estimates , yo u ma y us e controlle d(uncontrolled ) emissio n estimate s an dcontro l devic e destructio n efficienc y t o calculat e you r uncontrolle d (controlled ) emission s provide dth e contro l devic e destructio n efficienc y wa s calculate da t

th e sam e tim e yo u collecte dth e dat at o develo p you r facility' s controlle d(uncontrolled ) emissio n estimatio nequation s an d factors
. (c ) Assig n t o eac hformul aa n uncontrolle demissio n estimatio n equatio no r

facto r base do nth e en d product / thicknes s combinatio n fo r whic htha t

formul ai s used
. (d)(1 ) T o calculat e you r annua l uncontrolle demission s fromwet-ou t area s tha t

d o no t hav e an y captur e an d contro l fromwet-ou t

area s tha t

ar e capture db y a nenclosur e bu t ar e vente d t o th e atmospher e an dno t t o acontro l device , multipl y eac hformula' s annua l usag e b y it s appropriat e emissio n estimatio n equatio n o r facto r an dsu m th e individua l results
. (2 ) T o calculat e you r

annua l uncontrolle demission s tha t escap e from th e enclosur e o n th e wet-ou t area , multipl y eac hformula' s annua l usag e b y it s appropriat e uncontrolle demissio n estimatio n equatio n o r factor , su mth e individua l results , an dmultipl y th e summatio nb y 1 minu s th e percen t captur e (expresse da s afraction). (3 ) T o calculat e you r

annua l uncontrolle dove n emissions , multipl y eac hformula' s annua l usag e b y it s appropriat e uncontrolle demissio n estimatio n equatio no r facto r an dsu m th e individua l results
. (4 ) T o calculat e you r

annua l controlle demissions , multipl y eac h formula' s annua l usag e b y it s appropriat e emissio n estimatio n equatio no r

facto r an dsu mth e individua l result s t o obtai n tota l annua l controlle demissions
. (e ) Wher e afacilit y i s calculatin g bot h uncontrolle dan dcontrolle demissio nP.3 0

Federa l Register /Vjo k 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s 

### 4035 1 estimatio nequation s an dfactors , yo u mus t tes t th e sam e formulae
. I n addition , yo u mus t

develo p boti i set s o f equation s an dfactor s fromth e sam e tests . § 63.587 5 Howd o I determin e th e captur e efficienc y ofth e enclosur e o n m y wet-ou t are a an d th e captur e efficienc y of m y oven(s) ? (a ) Th e captur e efficienc y o f awet-ou t are aenclosur e i s assume dt o b e 10 0 percen t i f i t meet s th e desig nan d operatio nrequirement s fo r apermanen t tota l enclosur e specifie di nEP A Metho d 204.
. If apermanen t

tota l enclosur e doe s no t exist , the natemporar y tota l enclosur e mus t

b e constructe dan d verifie dusin g Metho d204 , an dcaptur e efficienc y testin g mus t

b e determine d
. usin g Method s 204 B throug hE
. (b ) Th e captur e efficienc y o f a nove n i s t o b e considere d10 0 percen t . provide dth e ove ni s operate dunde r negativ e pressure . § 63.588 0 Ho wd o I determin e howmuc h nea t resi n plu s i s applie d t o th e lin e an d howmuc h nea t ge l coa t plu s i s applie d t o th e line ? Us e th e followin g procedure s t o determin e ho w muc hnea t resi n plu s an dnea t ge l coa t plu s i s applie dt o th e lin e eac hyear . (a ) Trac k formul ausag e b y en d product/thicknes s combinations
. (b ) Us e in-hous e record s t o sho w usage . Thi s ma y b e eithe r from automate dsystem s o r

manua l records
. (c ) Recor ddail y th e usag e o f eac h formula/en dproduc t

combinatio n o n eac hline
. Thi s i s t o b e recorde da t th e en do f eac hru n(i.e. , whe nachangeove r i nformul ao r

produc t i s made ) an da t th e en do f

eac hshift
. (d ) Su mth e amount s fromth e dail y record s t o calculat e annua l usag e o f eac hformula/en dproduc t combinatio n b y line
. § 63.588 5 Ho wd o I calculat e th e percen t reductio n t o demonstrat e compliance ? (a ) Compliant

line option. If

al l o f you r wet-ou t area s hav e permanen t enclosure s tha t

mee t th e requirement s o f Metho d20 4 fo r

apermanen t

tota l enclosure , an dal l o f

you r wet-ou t are a emission s an dove n emission s ar e vente dt o a n add-o ncontro l device , us e Equatio n 1 o f

thi s sectio nt o demonstrat e compliance
. I n al l othe r situations , us e Equatio n2 o f thi s sectio n t o demonstrat e compliance
. PR : (Inlet)-(Outlet ) X10 0 (Eq
. 1 )

(Inlet ) VWiere. * P R= percen t

reductio n Inle t = emission s enterin g th e contro l device , lb s pe r year Outle t = emission s exitin g th e contro l devic e t o th e atmosphere , lb s pe r year
(WAE U+ O u )

- (WAE C + O c ) P R= ^ —. —^—i r- £^xl0 0 WAE u + O u (Eq
. 2 )

VWiere: O u= uncontrolle dove n emissions , lb s pe r O c = controlle dove nemissions , lb s pe r yea r P R= percen t

reductio n, A ,J eai„ _

, . . (b ) Averaging Option. Us e Equatio n 3 WAE U= uncontrolle dwet-ou t

are aemissions , WAE C = controlle dwet-ou t

are aemissions , o f

^ sectio n t 0 ca l c u l a t e percen t lb s pe r yea r lb s pe r yea r reduction
.

P R= [ t n" I 

## £wAE ui 

## +XO u

j i= i j= i 

### P

## 1

XWAE ci 

## +£0 c

j .i= i j= i [ mn | 

## XWAE ui+ 

## ]TO uj 

## l x 10 0 (Eq
. 3 )

i= l j= l VWiere.

- P R= percen t

reductio n WAE U i = uncontrolle demission s fromwet
out are ai , lb s pe r

yea r OU J ^uncontrolle demission s fromove nj , lb s pe r yea r WAEci = controlle demission s fromwet-ou t are ai , lb s pe r

yea r OC J = controlle demission s fromove nj , lb s pe r yea r i = numbe r o f wet-ou t area s j = numbe r

o f oven s m= numbe r

o f wet-ou t area s uncontrolle d n= numbe r

o f oven s uncontrolle d o = numbe r

o f wet-ou t area s controlle d p = numbe r

o f oven s controlle d (3 ) Add-on control

device option. Us e Equatio n 1 o f

thi s sectio nt o calculat e percen t reduction
. (4 ) Combination option. Us e Equation s 1 throug h3 o f thi s section , a s applicable , t o calculat e percen t reduction
. § 63.589 0 Howd o I calculat e a n emissio n facto r t o demonstrat e compliance ? (a ) Compliant

line option. Us e Equatio n 1 o f

thi s sectio n t o calculat e a n emissio n facto r

i n lbs/ton
. WAE B +WAE c + O u + O C)(10( )

( R+ G ) (Eq
. 1 )

VWiere : E= emissio nfactor

i nlbs/to no

f resi nan dgel coa t WAE U= uncontrolle dwet-ou t

are aemissions , lb s pe r yea r WAE C = controlle dwet-ou t

are aemissions , lb s pe r yea r O u= uncontrolle dove n emissions , lb s pe r yea r O c = controlle dove nemissions , lb s pe r yea r R= tota l usag e o

f neat resi nplus , tp y G= tota l usag e o

f neat gel coat plus , tp y (b ) Averaging option. Us e Equatio n 2 o f thi s sectio nt o demonstrat e compliance
.P.3 1

4035 2 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /

Propose dRule s 

## £wAE u i 

## +£WAE c i 

## +J

T p u j 

## +XO cj 

## " E= i= l i= l H H

( R+ G ) • x 10 0 (Eq
. 2 )

VWiere : E= emissio nfactor

i nlbs/to no

f resi nan dge l coa t WAE U i = uncontrolle demission s fro mwet
out are ai , lb s pe r

yea r WAE C i = controlle demission s fro mwet-ou t are ai , lb s pe r

year = uncontr pe r year = controll i pe r yea r i = numbe r

o f wet-ou t area s j = numbe r

o f oven s m= numbe r

o f wet-ou t area s uncontrolle d n= numbe r

o f oven s uncontrolle d o = numbe r

o f wet-ou t area s controlle d p = numbe r

o f oven s controlle d R= tota l usag e o

f neat resi nplus , tp y G= tota l usag e o

f neat ge l coat plus , tp y (c ) Combination option. Us e Equation s 1 an d2 o f

thi s section , a s applicable , t o demonstrat e compliance
. Continuou s Complianc e Requirement s § 63.589 5 Howd o I monito r an d collec t dat a t o demonstrat e continuou s compliance ? (a ) Yo u mus t

collec t an dkee p arecor d o f dat aa s indicate di n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t SS
. (b ) Yo u mus t

monito r an dcollec t

dat a a s specifie di nparagraph s (b)(1 ) throug h (4 ) o f thi s section
. (1 ) Excep t

fo r monitorin g malfunctions , associate drepairs , an d require dqualit y assuranc e o r contro l activitie s (including , a s applicable , calibratio ncheck s an drequire dzer o an dspa nadjustments) , yo u mus t conduc t al l monitorin g i ncontinuou s operatio n(o r

collec t dat aa t al l require d intervals ) a t

al l times tha t

th e affecte d sourc e i s operating
. (2 ) Yo u ma y no t

us e dat arecorde d durin g monitorin g malfunctions , associate drepairs , an drequire dqualit y assuranc e o r

contro l activitie s fo r purpose s o f

thi s subpart , includin g dat a average s an dcalculations , o r fulfillin g a minimu mdat aavailabilit y requirement , i f apphcable
. Yo u mus t

us e al l th e dat a collecte ddurin g al l othe r period s i n assessin g th e operatio n o f th e contro l devic e an dassociate dcontro l system . (3 ) A t al l times, yo u mus t

maintai n necessar y part s fo r

routin e repair s o f

th e monitorin g equipment
. (4 ) A monitorin g malfunctio ni s an y sudden , infrequent , no t reasonabl y preventabl e failur e o f

th e monitorin g equipmen t

t o provid e vali ddata
. Monitorin g failure s tha t ar e cause di n par t b y poo r maintenanc e o r

careles s operatio nar e no t

malfunctions
. (c ) Yo u mus t collec t an dkee p record s o f resi nan dge l coa t

use , HA Pcontent , an doperatio nwher e th e resi n i s use di f yo u ar e meetin g an y emissio nlimit s base do napoin t

value
. Resi n us e record s ma y b e base do n purchas e record s i f

yo u ca nreasonabl y estimat e ho w th e resi n i s applied
. Th e HA P conten t record s ma y b e base do n Materia l Safet y Dat aSheet s o r o nresi n specification s supplie db y th e resi n supplier
. (d ) If yo u initiall y demonstrat e tha t al l resin s an dge l coat s mee t th e applicabl e poin t valu e emissio n limits , the n resi n an dge l coa t

us e record s ar e no t required
. If

afte r thi s initia l demonstration , yo u chang e t o ahighe r HA Presi n o r

ge l coat , o r

increas e th e resi no r ge l coa t HA Pcontent , o r

chang e t o ahighe r

emittin g resi n o r

ge l coa t applicatio n method , the n yo u mus t eithe r agai n demonstrat e that " al l resin s an dge l coat s stil l mee t th e applicabl e poin t valu e emissio n limits , o r begi n collectin g resi nus e record s an d calculat e complianc e o na12-mont h rollin g average . (e ) Yo u mus t

recor dal l time s tha t

we t are aenclosure s o n an y pultrusio n machine s ar e open , an dresi ni s presen t i nth e resi n bath
. § 63.590 0 Howd o I demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit h th e standards ? (a ) Yo u mus t

demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit heac hstandar di n § 63.580 5 tha t

applie s t o yo u accordin g t o th e method s specifie di n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(3 ) o f

thi s section
. (1 ) Complianc e wit hemissio n limit s fo r source s usin g add-o ncontro l device s i s demonstrate dfollowin g th e procedure s i n 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t SS
. Source s usin g add-o n control s ma y als o us e continuou s emissio n monitor s t o demonstrat e continuou s complianc e a s a naltemativ e t o contro l paramete r monitoring
. (2 ) Complianc e wit hemissio nlimit s usin g th e poin t

valu e syste mi s demonstrate db y maintainin g apoin t Valu e les s tha n o r

equa l t o th e appropriat e poin t

valu e liste di n Tabl e 3 o r 5 o f thi s subpart , o na12-mont h rollin g average , o r

b y includin g i neac h complianc e repor t

acertificatio ntha t

al l resin s an dge l coat s mee t th e appropriat e poin t

valu e limits , a s discusse di n§ 63.5895(d)
. (3 ) Complianc e wit hth e wor k practic e standard s i nTabl e 4 o f thi s subpar t

i s demonstrate db y performin g th e wor k practic e require dfo r

you r operation
. ' (b ) Yo u mus t

repor t eac hdeviatio n fromeac hstandar dtha t applie s t o yo u i n§ 63.5805
. Th e deviation s mus t b e reporte daccordin g t o di e requirement s i n §63.5910
. (c ) Wit hth e exceptio nprovide di n paragrap h(d ) o f

thi s section , durin g period s o f

startup , shutdow n o r malfunction , yo u mus t mee t th e emissio n limit s an dwor k practic e standard s tha t

appl y t o you . (d ) Durin g period s o f

startup , shutdown , o r

malfunction , yo u d o no t nee dt o mee t

th e standard(s ) i n § 63.580 5 tha t

requir e a nadd-o ncontro l device , bu t

yo u mus t

operat e you r

. affecte dsourc e i naccordanc e wit hth e startup , shutdown , an dmalfunctio n pla nan dmee t

al l standard s tha t

d o no t requir e th e operatio n o f th e add-o n contro l device
. .-,, , ..<

• H j , . (e ) Consisten t

with,§ § 63.6(e ) an d 63.7(e)(1) , deviation s tha t occu r durin g aperio do f

malfunctio n fo r

those , affecte dsource s an dstandard s specifie d i nparagrap h(d ) o f

thi s sectio nar e no t violation s i f

yo u demonstrat e t o th e Administrator' s satisfactio n tha t yo u wer e operatin g i n accordanc e wit hth e startup , shutdown , an dmalfunctio n plan
. Th e Administrato r wil l determin e whethe r deviation s tha t

occu r durin g a perio do f

startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio nar e violations , accordin g t o th e provision s i n§ 63.6(e)
. Notifications , Reports , An d Record s § 63.590 5 Wha t notification s mus t I submi t an d when ? (a ) Yo u mus t

submi t al l o f th e notification s i n Tabl e 1 3 o f thi s subpar t tha t appl y t o you , b y th e date s i n Tabl e 1 3 o f thi s subpart
. Th e notification s ar e describe dmor e full y i nsubpar t A , Genera l Provisions , reference di n Tabl e 13
. (b ) If yo u chang e an y informatio n submitte di nan y notification , yo u mus t submi t th e change s i nwritin g t o th e Administrato r

withi n 1 5 calenda r

day s afte r th e change
. § 63.591 0 Wha t report s mus t I submi t an d when ? (a ) Yo u mus t

submi t eac hrepor t

i n Tabl e 1 4 o f

thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o • you . (b ) Unles s th e Administrato r ha s approve dadifferen t

schedul e fo r submissio no f

report s unde r

§ 63.10(a) ,P.3 2

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 

### 4035 3
yo u mus t

submi t eac hrepor t

b y th e dat e i nTabl e 1 4 o f

thi s subpar t

an d accordin g t o paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h (5 ) o f thi s section
. (1 ) Th e first

complianc e repor t

mus t cove r th e perio dbeginnin g o nth e complianc e dat e tha t

i s specifie dfo r you r affecte dsourc e i n§ 63.580 0 an d endin g o nJun e 3 0 o r

Decembe r

31 , whicheve r

dat e i s th e firs t

dat e followin g th e en do f

th e firs t calenda r hal f afte r th e complianc e dat e tha t i s specifie dfo r

you r sourc e i n§ 63.5800
. (2 ) Th e first

complianc e repor t

mus t b e postmarke do r

delivere dn o late r

tha n Jul y 3 1 o r

Januar y 31 , whicheve r dat e follow s th e en do f

th e firs t calenda r

hal f afte r th e complianc e dat e tha t i s specifie dfo r

you r affe'cte dsourc e i n §63.5800
. (3 ) Eac hsubsequen t

complianc e repor t mus t cove r th e semiannua l reportin g perio dfromJanuar y 1 throug h Jun e 3 0 o r

th e semiannua l reportin g perio dfromJul y 1 throug hDecembe r 31
. (4 ) Eac hsubsequen t

complianc e repor t mus t b e postmarke do r

delivere d n o late r tha nJul y 3 1 o r

Januar y 31 , whicheve r

dat e i s th e first

dat e followin g di e en do f

th e semiannua l reportin g period
. (5 ) Fo r eac haffecte dsourc e tha t i s subjec t t o permittin g requirement s pursuan t t o 4 0 CF Rpar t

7 0 o r 71, ' an d i f th e permittin g authorit y ha s establishe ddate s fo r

submittin g semiannua l report s pursuan t t o § 70.6(3)(iii)(A ) o r

§ 71.6(3)(iii)(A) , yo u ma y submi t

th e first an dsubsequen t complianc e report s accordin g t o tile date s th e permittin g authorit y ha s establishe dinstea do f

accordin g t o th e date s i nparagraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f thi s section
. (c ) Th e complianc e repor t mus t contai nth e informatio ni nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(6 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) Compan y nam e an daddress
. (2 ) Statemen t

b y aresponsibl e officia l wit htha t official' s name , title , an d signature , certifyin g th e truth , accuracy , an dcompletenes s o f

th e conten t

o f th e report . (3 ) Dat e o f

th e repor t

an dbeginnin g an dendin g date s o f

th e reportin g period
. (4 ) If yo u ha dastartup , shutdow no r . malfunctio ndurin g th e reportin g perio d an dyo u too k

action s consisten t

wit h you r startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio nplan , th e complianc e repor t mus t includ e th e informatio ni n §63.10(d)(5)(i)
. (5 ) If ther e are . n o deviation s froman y emissio nlimitation s (emissio nlimi t an d operatin g limit ) tha t

applie s t o you , an d ther e ar e n o deviation s fromth e requirement s fo r

wor k practic e standard s i n Tabl e 4 o f thi s subpart , a statemen t

tha t ther e wer e n o deviation s fromth e emissio nlimitation s o r wor k practic e standard s durin g th e reportin g period
. (6 ) If ther e wer e n o period s durin g whic hth e continuou s monitorin g syste m(CMS) , includin g acontinuou s emissio n monitorin g syste m(CEMS) , an doperatin g paramete r monitorin g system s wa s ou t

o f contro l a s specifie d i n§ 63.8(c)(7) , astatemen t tha t ther e wer e n o period s durin g th e whic hth e CM S wa s ou t

o f contro l durin g th e reportin g period
. (d ) Fo r eac hdeviatio n froma n emissio n limitatio n (i.e. , emissio n limit , operatin g limit ) an dfo r eac hdeviatio n fromtiie requirement s fo r wor k practic e standard s tha t

occur s a t

a n affecte d sourc e wher e yo u ar e no t usin g aCM S t o compl y wit hth e emissio n limitation s o r wor k practic e standard s i nthi s subpart , th e complianc e repor t mus t contai nth e informatio ni n paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s sectio n an di n paragraph s (d)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f thi s section
. Thi s include s period s o f startup , shutdown , an dmalfunction
. (1 ) Th e tota l operatin g tim e o f eac h affecte dsourc e durin g tiie reportin g period
. (2 ) Informatio no nth e number , duration , an dcaus e o f

deviation s (includin g unknow ncause , i f applicable) , a s applicable , an dth e - correctiv e actio ntaken
. (e ) Fo r eac hdeviatio n froma n emissio n limitatio n(i.e. , emissio nlimi t an doperatin g limit ) occurrin g a t a n affecte dsourc e wher e yo u ar e usin g a CM S t o compl y wit hth e emissio n limitatio ni nthi s subpart , yo u mus t includ e th e informatio ni n paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s sectio n an di n paragraph s (e)(1 ) throug h(12 ) o f thi s section
. Thi s include s period s o f startup , shutdown , an dmalfunction
. (1 ) Th e dat e an dtim e tiiat eac h malfunctio nstarte dan dstopped
. (2 ) Th e dat e an dtim e tha t eac hCM S wa s inoperative , excep t fo r zer o (low

level ) an dhigh-leve l checks
. (3 ) Th e date , tim e an dduratio n tha t eac hCM S wa s ou t

o f control , includin g th e informatio ni n § 63.8(c)(8).
. (4 ) Th e dat e an dtim e tha t eac h deviatio nstarte dan dstopped , an d whethe r eac hdeviatio noccurre ddurin g aperio do f

startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , o r

durin g anothe r

period
. (5 ) A summar y o f

th e tota l duratio n o f th e deviatio ndurin g th e reportin g perio dan dth e tota l duratio na s a percen t o f th e tota l sourc e operatin g tim e durin g tha t

reportin g period
. (6 ) A breakdow no f

th e tota l duratio n o f thedeviation s durin g th e reportin g perio dint o thos e tha t

ar e du e t o startup , shutdown , contro l equipmen t problems , proces s problems , othe r know n causes , an dothe r

unknow n causes . (7 ) A summar y o f

th e tota l duratio n o f CM S downtim e durin g th e reportin g perio dan dth e tota l duratio n o f CM S downtim e a s apercen t o f th e tota l sourc e operatin g tim e durin g tha t reportin g period
. (8 ) A n identificatio no f eac h hazardou s ai r

pollutan t

tha t wa s monitore da t

th e affecte dsource . (9 ) A brie f

descriptio n o f

th e proces s units
. (10 ) A brie f

descriptio no f

th e CMS
. (11 ) Th e dat e ofth e lates t CM S certificatio n o r

audit
. (12 ) A descriptio no f

an y change s i n CMS , processes , o r

control s sinc e th e las t reportin g period
. (f ) Eac haffecte dsourc e tha t ha s obtaine datitl e V operatin g permi t pursuan t t o 4 0 CF Rpar t

7 0 o r 7 1 mus t repor t al l deviation s a s define di n thi s subpar t i nth e semiannua l monitorin g repor t require db y § 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A ) o r § 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A)
. If

a naffecte dsourc e submit s acomplianc e repor t pursuan t

t o Tabl e 1 4 o f

thi s subpar t

alon g with , o r a s par t of , th e semiannua l monitorin g repor t require db y § 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A ) o r § 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) , an dth e complianc e repor t include s al l require dinformatio n concernin g deviation s fro man y emissio nlimitatio n (includin g an y operatin g limit ) o r

wor k practic e requiremen t

i nthi s subpart , submissio n o f th e complianc e repor t shal l b e deeme dt o satisf

y an y obligatio n t o • repor t th e sam e deviation s i n th e semiannua l monitorin g report . However , submissio n o f acomplianc e repor t shal l no t

otherwis e affec t

an y obligatio nth e affecte dsourc e ma y hav e t o repor t deviation s frompermi t requirement s t o th e permi t authority
. (g ) Yo u shoul dsubmi t

complianc e report s an dstartup , shutdown , malfunctio n report s base do n th e requirement s i n Tabl e 1 4 o f thi s subpart
. Yo u d o no t

nee dt o conside r

th e requirement s i n § 63.99 9 whe n submittin g thes e reports . § 63.591 5 Wha t record s mus t I keep ? (a ) Yo u mus t

kee p th e record s liste d i nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(3 ) o f thi s section
. (1 ) A cop y o f

eac hnotificatio n an d repor t tha t you'submitte dt o compl y wit hthi s subpart , includin g al l documentatio n supportin g an y Initia l Notificatio no r

Notificatio n o f Complianc e Status'tha t yo u submitted , accordin g t o th e requirement s i n §63.10(b)(2)(xiv)
. (2 ) Th e record s i n§ 63.6(e)(3)(iii ) throug h(v ) relate dt o startup , shutdown , an dmalfunction
.4035 4 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s (3 ) Record s o f

performanc e tests , design , an dperformanc e evaluation s a s require di n§ 63.10(b)(2)(viii)
. (b ) If yo u us e a nadd-o ncontro l device , yo u mus t

kee p al l record s require di n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

SS , t o sho w continuou s complianc e wit h thi s subpart
. (c ) Yo u mus t

kee p al l data , assumptions , an dcalculation s use dt o determin e poin t

value s fo r

operation s liste di nTable s 3 an d5 o f thi s subpart
. (d ) Yo u mus t

kee p acertifie d statemen t

tha t yo u ar e i ncomplianc e wit hth e wor k

practic e requirement s i n Tabl e 4 o f

thi s subpart , a s applicable
. (e ) Fo r ane w o r

existin g continuou s lamination /

castin g operation , yo u mus t kee p th e record s liste di nparagraph s (e)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s section , whe n complyin g wit hth e percen t reductio n and/o r lbs/to nrequirement s specifie di n paragraph s (a) throug h(d ) o f § 63.5805
. (1 ) Yo u mus t

kee p al l data , assumptions , an dcalculation s use dt o determin e percen t

reductio nand/o r

lbs / to na s applicable ; (2 ) Yo u mus t

kee p abrie f

descriptio n o f th e rational e fo r

th e assignmen t

o f a n equatio no r

facto r t o eac hformula ; (3 ) Whe nusin g facility-specifi c emissio nestimatio nequation s o r factors , yo u mus t

kee p al l data , assumptions , an dcalculation s use dt o deriv e th e emissio nestimatio n equation s an dfactor s an didentificatio n an drational e fo r

th e worst-cas e formula ; an d (4 ) Fo r al l emissio nestimatio n equation s an demissio nfactors , yo u mus t kee p documentatio ntha t th e appropriat e regulator y agenc y ha s approve dthem
. § 63.592 0 I n wha t for m an d howlon g mus t I kee p m y records ? (a) Yo u mus t

maintai nal l applicabl e record s i nsuc hamanne r tha t the y ca n b e readil y accesse dan dar e suitabl e fo r inspectio naccordin g t o § 63.10(b)(1)
. (b ) A s specifie di n§ 63.10(b)(1) , yo u mus t kee p eac hrecor dfo r

5 year s followin g th e dat e o f

eac hoccurrence , measurement , maintenance , correctiv e action , report , o r

record
. (c ) Yo u mus t

retai nyou r

record s o f th e mos t recen t 2 year s onsite , o r

you r record s mus t

b e accessibl e t o a n inspecto r

whil e onsite
. You r

record s o f th e remainin g 3 year s ma y b e retaine d offsite
. Othe rRequirement s an d Informatio n § 63,592 5 Wha t part s of th e Genera l Provision s appl y t o me ? Tabl e 1 5 o f

thi s subpar t

show s whic h part s o f th e Genera l Provision s i n § § 63. 1 throug h63.1 5 appl y t o you . §63.593 0 Wh o implement s an d enforce s thi s subpart ? (a ) Thi s subpar t

ca nb e administere d b y us , th e EPA , o r

adelegate dauthorit y suc ha s you r

State , local , o r

triba l agency . If

th e EP A Administrato r ha s delegate dauthorit y t o you r State , local , o r triba l agency , the ntha t agenc y ha s th e authorit y t o administe r an denforc e thi s subpart
. Yo u shoul dcontac t you r EP A Regiona l Offic e t o findou t i f thi s subpar t i s delegate dt o you r

State , local , o r triba l agency . (b ) I ndelegatin g implementatio n an d enforcemen t

authorit y o f

thi s subpar t

t o aState , local , o r

triba l agenc y unde r sectio n4 0 CF Rpar t

63 , subpar t

E , th e authoritie s containe di nparagrap h(c ) o f thi s sectio nar e no t

delegated
. (c ) Th e authoritie s tha t wil l no t b e delegate dt o State , local , o r triba l agencie s ar e liste di nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) Approva l o f

alternative s t o th e emissio nstandard s i n§ 63.580 5 unde r § 63.6(g)
. (2 ) Approva l o f

majo r alternative s t o tes t method s unde r

§ 63.7(e)(2)(a ) an d (f ) an da s define di n§ 63.90
. (3 ) Approva l o f

majo r alternative s t o monitorin g unde r

§ 63.8(f ) an da s define di n§63.90
. (4 ) Approva l o f

majo r alternative s t o recordkeepin g an dreportin g unde r § 63.10(f ) an da s define di n § 63.90
. § 63.593 5 Wha t definition s appl y t o thi s subpart ? Term s use di nthi s subpar t ar e define di nth e Clea nAi r Act , i n4 0 CF R 63.2 , th e Genera l Provisions , an di nthi s sectio na s follows : Atomized mechanical

application mean s applicatio no f

resi n o r ge l coa t wit hspra y equipmen t

tha t separate s th e liqui dint o afin e mist
. Thi s fine mis t ma y b e create db y forcin g th e liqui d unde r hig hpressur e throug ha n elliptica l orifice , bombardin g aliqui d strea mwit hdirecte dai r jets , o r a combinatio n o f

thes e techniques
. Bulk molding compound

(BMC) mean s aputty-lik e moldin g compoun d tha t contain s resins , catalysts , fillers, an dreinforcement s i n afor mthat-i s read y t o mold
. Bul k

moldin g compoun d ca nb e use di n compressio n moldin g an dinjectio n moldin g operation s t o manufactur e reinforce dplasti c composite s products
. BMC manufacturing mean s aproces s tha t involve s th e preparatio no f BMC
. BMC manufacturing/mixing mean s a groupin g o f

processe s tha t

involve s . BM C manufacturin g and/o r mixing
. Centrifugal

casting mean s aproces s fo r fabricatin g cylindrica l composites , suc ha s pipes , i n whic hcomposit e material s ar e positione dinsid e a rotatin g hollo w .mandre l an dhel di n plac e b y centrifuga l force s unti l th e par t i s cured
. Charge mean s th e amoun t o f SM C o r BM C tha t

i s place dint o acompressio n o r injectio nmol dt o complet e on e mol d cycle
. Cleaning mean s remova l o f composit e materials , suc ha s cure dan duncure d resi nfromequipment , finishedsurfaces , floors , hand s o f

employees , o r

an y othe r surfaces
. Clear production gel

coat mean s a n unpigmented , unfilled , quick-settin g resi n use dt o improv e th e surfac e appearanc e and/o r

performanc e o f composites
. I t

ca n b e use dt o for mth e surfac e laye r

of an y composite s othe r tha n thos e use dfofmold s i n toolin g operations
. Closed molding mean s agroupin g o f processe s fo r

fabricatin g composite s i na wa y tha t HAP-containin g material s ar e no t expose dt o th e atmospher e excep t durin g th e materia l loadin g stag e (e.g. , compressio n molding , injectio n molding , an dresi ntransfe r molding)
. Composite mean s ashape dan dcure d par t produce db y usin g composit e materials
. Composite materials mean s a combinatio nofth e followin g materials : resin , ge l coat , monomer , catalyst , pigment , filler, an dreinforcement
. Compression molding mean s aclose d moldin g proces s fo r

fabricatin g composite s i n whic hcomposit e material s ar e place dinsid e matche d meta l die s tha t

ar e use dt o cur e th e material s unde r

hea t an dpressur e withou t exposur e t o th e atmosphere
. Th e composit e material s use di n thi s proces s ar e generall y SM C o r BMC
. Compression/injection molding mean s agroupin g o f

processe s tha t involve s th e us e o f

compressio n moldin g and/o r

injectio n molding
. Continuous casting mean s a continuou s proces s fo r fabricatin g composite s i n whic hcomposit e material s ar e place do na n in-lin e conveyo r

bel t t o produc e cas t

sheet s tha t ar e cure di n a noven . Continuous lamination mean s a continuou s proces s fo r fabricatin g composite s i n whic hcomposit e material s ar e typicall y sandwiche d betwee n plasti c films , pulle dthroug h compactio n rollers , an dcure di n a n oven . Thi s proces s i s generall y use dt o produc e fla t

o r corrugate dproduct s o n a nin-lin e conveyor . Continuous lamination/casting mean s agroupin g o f

processe s tha t

involve s th e us e o f continuou s laminatio nand/o r continuou s casting
. Controlled

emissions mean s thos e emission s tha t

ar e vente dfrom acontro l devic e t o th e atmosphere
.P.3 4

Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2,

- 2001/Propose dRule s 4035 5 Corrosion-resistant

end-use applications mean s application s wher e th e produc t

i s manufacture dspecificall y fo r a napplicatio ntha t

require s aleve l o f chemica l inertnes s o r

resistanc e t o chemica l attac k

abov e tha t

require dfo r typica l reinforce dplasti c composite s products
. Thes e application s include , bu t ar e no t limite dto , chemica l processin g an dstorage ; pul p an dpape r production ; sewe r

an dwastewate r treatment ; powe r

generation ; potabl e - wate r transfe r an dstorage ; foo dan d dru g processing ; pollutio no r odo r control ; metal s productio n "an dplating ; semiconducto r

manufacturing ; petroleu mproduction , refining , an d storage ; mining ; textil e production ; nuclea r material s storage ; swimmin g pools ; an dcosmeti c production , a s wel l a s end-us e application s tha t requir e hig hstrengti i resins
. Corrosion-resistant

industry standard include s th e followin g standards : ASEM E RTP- 1 o r

Sect
. X ; AST M D5364 , D3299 , D4097 , D2996 , D2997 , D3262 , D3517 , D3754 , D3840 , D4024 , D4160 , D4161 , D4162 , D4184 , D3982 , o r D3839 ; ANSI / AWW A C950 ; U L131 6 o r U L1746 , o r writte ncustome r

requirement s fo r resistanc e t o specifie dchemica l environments
. Corrosion-resistant

product mean s a produc t mad e wit hacorrosion-resistan t resi nan di s manufacture dt o a corrosion-resistan t

industr y standard , o r afoo dcontac t

industr y standard , o r

i s manufacture dfo r

corrosion-resistan t end-us e application s involvin g continuou s o r

temporar y chemica l exposures . Corrosion-resistant

resin mean s a resi ntha t

either : (1 ) Display s substantia l retentio no f

mechanica l propertie s whe n undergoin g AST M C-58 1 coupo n testing , wher e th e resi ni s expose dfo r 6 month s o r

mor e t o on e o f

th e followin g materials : materia l wit hap H > 12. 0 o r < 3.0 , oxidizin g o r

reducin g agents , organi c solvents , o r fuel s o r fue l additive s a s define di n4 0 CF R79.2
. I n th e coupo ntesting , th e expose dresi n need s t o demonstrat e aminimu mo f 5 0 percen t retentio no f

th e relevan t mechanica l propert y compare dt o th e sam e resi ni nunexpose dcondition
. I n addition , th e expose dresi n need s t o demonstrat e a nincrease dretentio no f th e relevan t

mechanica l propert y o f a t leas t 2 0 percen t

whe ncompare dt o a similarl y expose dgeneral-purpos e resin
. Fo r example , i f

the
. general-purpos e resi nretain s 4 5 percen t o f th e relevan t propert y whe nteste da s specifie dabove , the nacorrosion-resistan t resi nneed s t o retai na t leas t 6 5 percen t

(4 5 percen t plu s 2 0 percent ) o f

it s property . Th e general-purpos e resi nuse di nth e tes t . need s t o hav e a naverag e molecula r weigh t o f greate r tha n 1,000 , b e formulate dwit ha1: 2 rati o o f malei c anhydrid e t o phthali c anhydrid e an d 10 0 percen t

diethylen e glycol , an da styren e conten t

betwee n4 3 t o 4 8 percent ; o r (2 ) Complie s wit hindustr y standard s • tha t requir e specifi c exposur e testin g t o corrosiv e media , suc ha s U L1316 , U L 1746 , o r AST M F-1216
. Doctor box mean s th e bo x o r

troug h o na nSM C machin e int o whic hth e liqui dresi n past e i s delivere dbefor e i t i s metere dont o th e carrie r film. Filament winding mean s a nope n moldin g proces s fo r

fabricatin g composite s i nwhic hreinforcement s ar e fe dthroug haresi nbat han dwoun d ont o arotatin g mandrel
. Th e material s o nth e mandre l ma y b e rolle dou t o r worke db y usin g nonmechanica l tool s prio r t o curing
. Resi napplicatio n t o th e reinforcemen t

o nth e mandre l b y mean s othe r tha nth e resi nbath , suc ha s spra y guns , pressure-fe drollers , flo w coaters , o r brushe s i s no t

considere dfilament winding
. Filled mean s tha t

fillers hav e bee n adde dt o aresi nsuc htha t th e amoun t o f iner t substance s i s a t

leas t 1 0 percen t b y weigh t

o f th e tota l resi nplu s filler mixture
. Fillers mean s iner t

substance s disperse dthroughou t

aresin , suc ha s calciu mcarbonate , alumin atrihydrate , hydrou s aluminu msilicate , mica , feldspar , wollastonite , silica , an dtalc
. Material s tha t

ar e no t considere dt o b e fillers ar e glas s fibers o r an y typ e o f reinforcemen t

an dmicrospheres
. Fluid impingement

technology mean s aspra y gu n tha t

produce s a nexpandin g non-mistin g curtai n o f

liqui db y th e impingemen t

o f low-pressur e uninterrupte dliqui dstreams . Food contact industry standard mean s astandar drelate dt o foo dcontac t applicatio ncontaine di nFoo dan dDru g Administration' s regulation s a t 2 1 CF R 177.2420
. Gel coat application mean s aproces s

. wher e eithe r

clea r production , pigmente dproductio no r toolin g ge l coa t i s applied
. High strength resins mean s polyeste r resin s whic hhav e acastin g tensil e strengt ho f

10,00 0 pound s pe r

squar e inc ho r mor e an dwhic har e use dfo r manufacturin g product s tha t hav e hig h strengt hrequirement s suc ha s structura l member s an dutilit y poles
. Injection molding mean s aclose d moldin g proces s fo r

fabricatin g composite s i n whic hcomposit e material s ar e injecte dunde r pressur e int o aheate dmol dcavit y tha t represent s th e exac t

shap e o f

th e product
. Th e composit e material s ar e cure di n th e heate dmol dcavity
. Manual resin application mean s a n ope n moldin g proces s fo r fabricatin g composite s i n whic hcomposit e material s ar e applie dt o th e mol db y pourin g o r

b y usin g hand s an d nonmechanica l tools , s.uc ha s brushe s an drollers
. Material s ar e rolle dou t o r worke db y usin g nonmechanica l tool s prio r t o curing
. Th e us e o f

pressure-fe d roller s an dflo w coater s t o appl y resi n i s no t considere dmanua l resi n application
. Material storage mean s a n ancillar y proces s whic hinvolve s keepin g HAP

containin g materials , suc ha s resins , ge l coats , catalysts , monomers , an d cleaners , i n container s fo r an y lengt ho f time
. Container s ma y includ e bul k storag e terminals , tanks , totes , vessels , an dbuckets
. Mechanical

resin application mean s a nope n moldin g proces s fo r fabricatin g composite s i nwhic hcomposit e material s (excep t

ge l coat ) ar e applie dt o th e mol db y usin g mechanica l tool s suc ha s spra y guns , pressure-fe drollers , an dflo w coaters . Material s ar e rolle d ou t o r worke db y usin g nonmechanica l tool s prio r

t o curing
. Mixing mean s th e blendin g o r agitatio n o f

an y HAP-containin g material s i nvessel s tha t ar e 5.0 0 gallon s (18. 9 liters ) o r

larger
. Mixin g ma y involv e th e blendin g o f resin , ge l coat , filler, reinforcement , pigments , catalysts , monomers , an dan y othe r additives
. Model point value equations mean s algebrai c expression s tha t wer e derive d t o estimat e th e quantit y o f HA Pemitte d base do n parameter s tha t ca n b e regulated
. Parameter s tha t ca nb e regulate dinclud e resi n an dge l coa t HA Pcontent . Mode l poin t valu e

. equation s wer e derive dfo r ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g processes . The y ar e use dt o calculat e poin t value s tha t

reflec t th e relativ e emissio n contro l statu s o f aprocess . Mode l poin t

valu e equation s ar e no t t o b e use dt o estimat e actua l emission s becaus e no t

al l parameter s tha t

ar e know nt o affec t

emission s ar e incorporate dint o th e equations
. Mo7 dmean s acavit y o r matri x int o o r ont o whic hth e composit e material s ar e place dan dfromwhic hth e produc t take s it s form
. Neat gel coat plus mean s ge l coa t

plu s an y organi c HAP-containin g material s tha t ar e adde dt o th e ge l coa t b y th e supplie r o r th e facility , excludin g catalyst s an dpromoters . Nea t ge l coa t plu s doe s includ e an y addition s o f styren e o r

methy l methacrylat e monome r

i nan y form , includin g i n catalyst s an dpromoters . Neat resin plus mean s nea t resi n plu s an y organi c HAP-containin g material s

### 4035 6 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s tha t ar e adde dt o th e resi n b y th e supplie r o r th e facility
. Nea t

resi n plu s doe s no t includ e an y adde dfiller, reinforcements , catalysts , o r promoters . Nea t resi n doe s includ e an y addition s o f styren e o r

methy l methacrylat e monome r

i n an y form , includin g i n catalyst s an dpromoters . Non-atomized

mechanical application mean s th e us e o f applicatio n tool s otiie r tha n brushe s t o appl y resi n an dge l coa t tha t d o no t creat e afine liqui dmist
. Example s includ e flo w coaters , pressur e fe d rollers , an dflui dimpingemen t technolog y spra y guns . Noncorrosion-resistant

resin mean s an y resi n othe r

tha n acorrosion

resistan t resi n o r atoolin g resin
. Noncorrosion-resistant

product

mean s an y produc t

othe r tha n acorrosion

resistan t produc t o r amold
. Operation mean s aspecifi c proces s typicall y foun da t

areinforce dplasti c composite s facility
. Example s o f operation s ar e noncorrosion-resistan t manua l resi n application , corrosion

resistan t mechanical ' resi n application , pigmente dge l coa t

application , mixin g an dstorage . Operation Group mean s agroupin g o f individua l operation s base dprimaril y o n mol dtype . Example s ar e ope n molding , close dmolding , an d centrifuga l casting
. Open molding mean s aproces s fo r fabricatin g composite s i n awa y tha t HAP-containin g material s ar e expose d t o th e atmosphere
. Ope n moldin g include s processe s suc ha s manua l resi n application , mechanica l resi n application , filament

winding , an dge l coa t application
. Pigmented

production gel

coat mean s apigmente dquick-settin g resi n use dt o improv e surfac e appearanc e and/o r performanc e o f

composites
. I t

ca n b e use dt o for mth e surfac e laye r o f an y composite s othe r

dia n thos e use dfo r mold s i n toolin g operations
. Point value mean s arelativ e measur e o f th e us e o f

emission s reduction s technique s an dthei r

effectiveness
. Mode l poin t

valu e equation s wer e develope dfo r

eac hope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g proces s t o calculat e poin t values , whic hhav e unit s o f lb s o f HA Pemission s pe r

to n o f nea t resi n plu s o r nea t ge l coa t plu s used
. Poin t value s ar e calculate db y usin g th e appropriat e mode l poin t valu e equatio n •fo r agive n process , multiplie db y an y applicabl e contro l factors
. Contro l factor s ar e use dt o incorporat e emission s reduction s achieve dfrom add-o n contro l devices
. Polymer casting mean s aproces s fo r fabricatin g composite s i n whic h composit e material s ar e ejecte dfrom a castin g machin e o r

poure dint o a n open ; partiall y open , o r

close dmol dan d cured
. Afte r

th e composit e material s ar e poure dint o th e mold , the y ar e no t rolle dou t

o r worke dprio r

t o curing
. Th e composit e material s ma y o r ma y no t includ e reinforcements
. Product s produce db y th e polyme r castin g proces s includ e culture dmarbl e product s an dpolyme r

concrete . Pultrusion mean s acontinuou s proces s fo r

manufacturin g composite s tha t hav e aunifor mcross-sectiona l shape
. Th e proces s consist s o f pullin g a fiber-reinforcing materia l throug ha resi n impregnatio n chambe r o r bat han d throug hashapin g die , wher e th e resi n i s subsequentl y cured
. Ther e ar e severa l type s o f pultrusio n equipment , suc ha s ope n bath , resi n injection' , an ddirec t di e injectio n equipment. ' Resin transfer

molding mean s a proces s fo r

manufacturin g composite s whereb y catalyze dresi n i s transferre do r injecte dint o aclose dmol di n whic h• fiberglass reinforcemen t ha s bee n placed
. Sheet molding compound

(SMC) mean s aready-to-mol dputty-lik e moldin g compoun dprocesse dint o shee t form
. Th e moldin g compoun di s sandwiche dbetwee n ato p an dabotto m film, an di t

contain s resins , catalysts , fillers, chemica l thickeners , mol d releas e agents , reinforcements , an d
. othe r ingredients
. Shee t

moldin g compoun dca n b e use di n compressio n moldin g t o manufactur e reinforce d plasti c composite s products
. SMC manufacturing mean s aproces s whic hinvolve s th e preparatio n o f SMC
. Tooling mean s mol dproductio n o r

repair
. ' Tooling gel

coat mean s age l coa t

tha t i s use dt o for mth e surfac e laye r o f molds
. Toolin g ge l coat s generall y hav e hig hhea t

distortio n temperatures , lo w shrinkage , hig hbarco l hardness , an d hig hdimensiona l stability
. Tooling resin mean s aresi n tha t i s use dt o produc e molds
. Toolin g resin s generall y hav e hig hhea t distortio n temperatures , lo w shrinkage , hig h barco l hardness , an dhig hdimensiona l stability
. Uncontrolled

oven emissions mean s thos e emission s emitte dfromth e ove n throug hclose dven t

system s t o th e atmospher e an dno t

t o acontro l device
. Thes e emission s d o no t includ e emission s tha t

ma y escap e int o th e workplac e throug hth e openin g o f • panel s o r

door s o n th e oven s o r othe r simila r fugitiv e emission s i n th e workplace
. Uncontrolled

wet-out area emissions mean s an y o r

al l o f th e following : Emission s fromwet-ou t area s tha t

d o no t hav e an y captur e an dcontrol , emission s tha t

escap e fromwet-ou t

are a enclosures , an demission s fromwet-ou t area s tha t

ar e capture db y a n enclosur e bu t ar e vente dt o th e atmospher e an d no t t o a n add-o n contro l device
. Unfilled mean s tha t

ther e ha s bee n n o additio n o f

fillers t o aresi n o r

tha t les s tha n 1 0 percen t

o f filler s b y weigh t

o f th e tota l resi n plu s fille r mixtur e ha s bee n added
. Vapor suppressant

mean s a n additive , typicall y awax , tha t

migrate s t o th e surfac e o f

th e resi n durin g curin g an d form s abarrie r

t o sea l i n th e styren e an d reduc e styren e emissions
. Vapor-suppressed

resin mean s aresi n containin g avapo r

suppressan t

adde d fo r th e purpos e o f

reducin g styren e emission s durin g curing
. Table s t o Subpar tWWW W o f Par t6 3 A s require di n § § 63.5797 , 63.5798(a)(1 ) an d(b) , an d63.5810(a)(1) , t o calculat e mode l poin t value s fo r specifi c ope n moldin g an dcentrifuga l castin g proces s stream s yo u mus t us e th e equation s i n th e followin g table : TABL E 1 T O SUBPAR TWWW W O F PAR T63.—MODE L EQUATION S T O CALCULAT E POIN TVALUE S FO R SPECIFI C OPE N MOLDIN G AN D CENTRIFUGA L CASTIN G PROCES S STREAM S I t you roperatio n typ e i s a ne w o rexistin g . . . An d yo u us e . Wit h

. Us e thi s Mode l Poin t Valu e (PV ) Equatio n abc

. . . 1

. Ope n moldin g operatio n . a . Manua l resi n applicatio n i

. Nonvapor-suppresse d resi n ii

. Vapor-suppresse d resi n iii

. Vacuu m bagging/closed-mol d cur in g wit h rol l out
. iv

. Vacuu m bagging/closed-mol d cur in g withou t roll-out

. P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)2-27 5 P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP) 227 5 x ( 1 - (0.541 9 xVS R tes t value) ) P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)2-27 5 x (1-0.2133 ) P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)"7 5 x (1-0.4554 )P.3 6


## Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , August 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s 4035 7
TABL E 1 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—MODE L EQUATION S T O CALCULAT E POIN TVALUE S FO R SPECIFI C OPE N MOLDIN G AN D CENTRIFUGA L CASTIN G PROCES S STREAMS—Continue d I f you roperatio n typ e i s a ne w o rexistin g . . . An d yo u us e . Wit h Us e thi s Mode l Poin t Valu e (PV ) Equatio n u| "=

. . . b

. Mechanica l resi n applica tion

.

c . Filamen t windin g

2

. Centrifuga l castin g oper ation

. d

. Ge l coa t applicatio n Centrifuga l castin g ..... . i

. Nonvapor-suppresse d resi n an d atomize d application

. ii

. Vapor-suppresse d resi n an d atomise d application

. iii

. Vacuu m bagging/closed-mol d cur in g wit h roll-ou t an d atomize d appli cation

. iv

. Vacuu m bagging/closed-mol d cur in g withou t roll-ou t an d atomize d application

. v . Nonvapor-suppresse d resi n an d nonatomize d application

. vi

. Vapor-suppresse d resi n an d non atomize d application

. vii

. Closed-mol d curin g wit h roll-ou t an d no n atomize d application

. viii...Vacuu m bagging/closed-mol d cur in g withou t roll-ou t an d nonatom ize d application

. i

. Nonvapor-suppresse d resi n ii

. Vapor-suppresse d resi n Nonvapor-suppresse d ge l coa t Nonvapor-suppresse d resi n P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)2-*- » P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)2-»- » ( 1 -(0.455 9 xVS R tes t value) ) PV = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)-»-« « (1-0.1535 ) PV = 0.02 8 (1-0.3261 ) x(%HAP)2« 5 x P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)"7 5 P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)"7 5 , ; • ( 1 - (0.541 9 xVS R tes t value) ) P V = 0.02 8 x(%HAPp-" 5 x (1-0.2133 ) PV = 0.02 8 x(%HAP)" TM x (1-0.4554 ) PV. = 1.67 5 x(%HAP)'-2 " PV = 1.67 5 x(%HAP)'" ' x ( 1 -(0.469 3 xVS R tes t value) ) P V = 0.89 0 x(%HAP)i" 5 PV = 11.16x(%HAP )

a T o obtain , th e mode l poin t valu e fo ra n operatio n wit h a n add-o n contro l devic e multipl yth e P V abov e byth e add-o n contro l facto rcalculate d usin g Equatio n 1 of §63.5810 : Th e mode l poin t value s hav e limit s of lb s of HA P pe rto n of resi n o rge l coa t applied

. b Percen t HA P mean s tota l weigh t percen t o f HA P in-1h e resi n o rge l coa t prio rt o th e additio n o f fillers , catalyst, an d promoters
. <=VS R tes t valu e mean s th e percen t reductio n i n HAP

. emission s expressed , a s a decima l measure d b yth e VS R tes t method

. A s require di n §§63.580 0 an d63.584 0 yo u mus t demonstrate • complianc e wit hth e standard s b y th e date s i n th e followin g table : TABL E 2 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PARTT63.^COMPLIANC E DATE S FO R NE W AN D EXISTIN G REINFORCE D PLASTI C COMPOSITE S FACILITIE S i f you rfacilit yi s . And

. The n yo u mus t compl yb ythi s date : 1

. A n existin g sourc e

2

. A n existin g sourc e tha t i s a n are a sourc e 3

. Ane wsourc e ,. . 4

. Ane wsourc e .. . I s a major-sourc e o n o rbefor e th e publicatio n dat e of th e fina l rule

.

Become s a majo rsourc e afte rth e publicatio n i '"date of th e fina l rule

. I s a majo rsourc e a t startu p I s a n are a sourc e a t startu p an d become s . a majo rsource . i

. [Dat e 3 year s afte rth e publicatio n dat e of th e fina l rule] , o r ii

. Yo u must.accep t an d mee t a n enforceabl e HA P emissio n limi t belo wth e majo rsourc e threshol d prio rt o [dat e 3 year s afte rth e publicatio n dat e o f fina l rule]

. 3 year s afte rbecomin g a majo rsourc e o r [dat e 3 year s afte rth e publicatio n dat e of th e fina l rule] , whicheve ri s later

. Upo n startu p o r[publicatio n dat e of th e fina l rule] , whicheve ri s later

. Immediatel yupo n becomin g a majo rsource . A s require di n §§63.580 5 (a ) an d(c) , 63.5810(a ) throug h(b) , 63.5820(c) , 63.5830 , 63.5835 , an d63.5900(a)(2) , yo u mus t mee t th e appropriat e emissio n limit s i n th e followin g table : TABL E 3 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—EMISSIO N LIMIT S FO R EXISTIN G SMAL L BUSINES S SOURCE S EMITTIN G .LES S

THA N 25 0 TP Y O F HAP , O R OTHE R SOURCE S EMITTIN G LES S THA N 10 0 TP Y O F HA P I f you roperatio n typ e i s . . . 1

. Ope n molding—corrosion-resistan t (CR) b

.... . 2

. Ope n molding—non-C R

3 Ope n molding—toolin g An d yo u us e . . . a . Mechanica l resi n applicatio n b

. Filamen t windin g '

. c . Manua l resi n applicatio n a . Mechanica l resi n application-unfille d b.

. Mechanica l resi n application-fille d c . Filamen t windin g d

. Manua l resi n applicatio n a..Mechanica l resi n applicatio n b

. Manua l resi n applicatio n You remissio n limi t is u

. . . 19 0 lb/ton

. 16 3 lb/ton

. 12 4 lb/ton

. 11 0 lb/ton

. 14 4 lb/ton

. 17 8 lb/ton

. 8 3 lb/ton

. 25 6 lb/ton

. 12 3 lb/ton

.P.3 7


### 4035 8 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s TABL E 3 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—EMISSIO N LIMIT S FO R EXISTIN G SMAL L BUSINES S SOURCE S EMITTIN G LES S

THA N 

### 25 0 TP Y O F 

### HAP , O R OTHE R SOURCE S EMITTIN G LES S THA N 

### 10 0 TP Y O F 

### HAP—Continue d I f you roperatio n typ e i s . An d yo u us e . You remissio n limi t is a , 4

. Ope n molding—product s tha t requir e clas s 1 fir e an d smok e ratings

. 5
. Ope n molding—ge l coa t

6

. Centrifuga l castings—C R 7
. Centrifuga l casting—non-C R

. . 8

. Pultrusio n 9

. Continuou s lamination/castin g a . Mechanica l resi n applicatio n b

. Filamen t windin g c . Manua l resi n applicatio n a . Toolin g ge l coatin g b

. White/off whit e pigmente d ge l coatin g c . Al l othe rpigmente d ge l coatin g d

. Clea rproductio n ge l coatin g N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A: 57 5 lb/ton

. 25 3 lb/ton

. ' 31 1 lb/ton

. 39 4 lb/ton

. 26 5 lb/ton

. 37 7 lb/ton

. 504 lb/ton

. 53 6 lb/ton

. 39 6 lb/ton

. Reduc e tota l HA P emission s b yat leas t 6 0 weigh t percent
. Reduc e tota l HA P emission s b yat leas t 58. 5 weigh t percen t o rno t excee d a n emissio n limi t of 15. 7 lb s o f HA P pe rto n o f nea t resi n plu s an d neat ge l coa t plus

. a Emissio n limit s fo rope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g expresse d a s lb/to n ar e poin t value s calculate d usin g th e equation s show n i n Tabl e 1 of thi s subpart

. Yo u mus t b e at o rbelo wthes e value s base d o n a 12-mont h rollin g average . b Corrosion-resistan t application s als o includ e high-strengt h products

. 

### A s require di n §63.580 5 (a ) throug h(d) yo u mus t

mee t th e appropriat e work

practic e standard s i n th e followin g table : TABL E 4 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—WOR KPRACTIC E STANDARD S For

. Yo u must
. 1

. A ne wo rexistin g close d moldin g operatio n usin g compression/in
jectio n molding

. 2

. A ne wo rexistin g cleanin g operatio n 3

. A ne wo rexistin g material s storag e operatio n 4

. A n existin g pultrusio n operatio n usin g a wet-are a enclosur e 5
. A n existin g SM C manufacturin g operatio n 6

. A n existin g SM C manufacturin g operatio n 7
. A n existin g SM C manufacturin g operatio n 8

. Ane wo rexistin g BM C manufacturing/mixin g operation " 9

. A n existin g BM C manufacturing/mixin g 10

. A ne wo rexistin g BM C manufacturing/mixin g operation 0 Uncover , unwra p o rexpos e onl yon e charg e pe rmol d cycl e pe rcom pression/injectio n moldin g machine

. No t us e cleanin g solvent s tha t contai n HAP

. Kee p container s tha t stor e HA P material s close d o rcovere d excep t durin g th e additio n o rremova l of materials

. Kee p acces s panels , doors , and/o rhatche s close d wheneve rresi n i s i n th e bath , excep t tha t acces s panels , doors , and/o rhatche s mayb e ope n 3 0 minute s pe r8-hou rshift , o r4 5 minute s pe r12-hou rshift

. Clos e o rcove rth e docto rbo xo n eac h SM C manufacturin g machine

. Fol d o rsea l edge s o f SM C prio rt o storag e and/o rtransport
. Us e a nylo n fil m o ra fil m wit h a n equa l o rtowe rpermeabilit yt o styren e tha n nylo n t o enclos e SMC

. Us e mixe rcover s wit h n o visibl e gap s presen t i n th e mixe rcovers . No t activel yven t mixer s t o th e atmosphere

. Kee p th e mixe rcover s close d durin g mixin g excep t whe n addin g mate rial s t o th e mixin g vessels

. "Container s of 5 gallon s o rles s mayb e ope n whe n activ e mixin g i s takin g place , o rdurin g period s whe n the yar e i n proces s (i.e. , the yar e ac tivel ybein g use d t o appl yresin)

. Fo rpolyme rcastin g mixin g operations , container s o f 2 1 gallon s o rles s ma yb e ope n whil e activ e mixin g i s tak in g place

. 

### A s specifie di n §63.580 5 (b ) an d(d) , a s a n alternativ e t o tiie 9 5 percen t HAPemissio n reductio n requirement , yo u may mee t

th e appropriat e emissio n limit s i n th e followin g table : TABL E 5 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—ALTERNATIV E EMISSIO N LIMIT S FO R OPE N MOLDIN G AN D CENTRIFUGA L

CASTIN G OPERATION S WHER E TH E STANDAR D I S BASE D O N A PERCEN TREDUCTIO N REQUIREMEN T
I f you roperatio n typ e i s . . . 1

. Ope n molding—corrosion-resistan t (CR )
2

. Ope n molding—non-C R

3

. Ope n molding—toolin g 4

. Ope n molding—product s tha t requir e Clas s 1 Fir e an d Smoke Ratings

. An d yo u us e .. .
a . Mechanica l resi n applicatio n b

. Filamen t windin g c . Manua l resi n applicatio n a . Mechanica l resi n application-unfille d b

. Mechanica l resi n application-fille d c . Filamen t windin g d

. Manua l resi n applicatio n a . Mechanica l resi n applicatio n b

. Manua l resi n applicatio n . : a . Mechanica l resi n applicatio n b

. Filamen t windin g c . Manua l resi n applicatio n You remis sio n limi t is a

. . 1 0 lb/ton

. 9 lb/ton

. 7 lb/ton

. 8 lb/ton

. 6 lb/ton

. 9 lb/ton

. 4 lb/ton

. 1 3 lb/ton

. 7 lb/ton

. 2 9 lb/ton

. 1 3 lb/ton

. 1 6 lb/ton

.P.3 8



### Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4035 9
TABL E 5 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—ALTERNATIV E EMISSIO N LIMIT S FO R OPE N MOLDIN G AN D CENTRIFUGA L CASTIN G OPERATION S WHER E TH E STANDAR D I S BASE D O N A PERCEN TREDUCTIO N REQUIREMENT—Continue d

I f you roperatio n typ e i s . . . 5
. Ope n molding—ge l coa t

6

. Centrifuga l Casting—C R 7
. Centrifuga l Casting—Non-C R An d yo u us e . . .
a . Toolin g ge l coatin g b

. White/off whit e pigmente d ge l coatin g c . Al l othe rpigmente d ge l coatin g d

. Clea rproductio n ge l coatin g N/ A N/ A You remis sio n limi t is 0

. . . 2 0 lb/ton

. 1 4 lb/ton

. 1 9 lb/ton

. 2 6 lb/ton

. 2 7 lb/ton

. 2 0 lb/ton

.
• a Th e emissio n limit s ar e calculate d usin g th e equation s show n i n Tabl e 1 of thi s subpart

. Yo u mus t b e a t o rbelo wthes e value s base d o n a 12-mont h rollin g average . b Corrosion-resistan t application s als o include-high-strengt h products

. 

### A s require di n §§63.5810(a)(1) , 63.5825(a),.63.5830(a) , an d63.5870 , yo u mus t conduc t performanc e tests , performanc e evaluations , an ddesig n evaluatio n accordin g t o th e requirement s i nth e followin g table : TABL E 6 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—BASI C REQUIREMENT S FO R PERFORMANC E TESTS , PERFORMANC E EVALUATIONS , AN D DESIG N EVALUATION S FO R NE W AN D EXISTIN G SOURCE S USIN G ADD-O N CONTRO L DEVICE S For

. Yo u must
. Usin g . Accordin g t o th e followin g requirement s 1

. Eac h enclosur e use d t o collec t an d rout e HA P emission s t o a n add-o n contro l device

. a . Determin e th e captur e efficiencyo f eac h enclo sur e use d t o captur e HA P emission s t o sen t t o a n add-o n contro l device

. EPAmethod s 20 4 an d 204 B throug h E i n Appendi xM o f 4 0 CF R part 51 , or .

. A n alternativ e tes t metho d tha t meet s th e dat a qualit yobjective s an d lowe r confidenc e limi t approache s fo ralter nativ e captur e efficiencyprotocol s an d tes t method s confine d i n 4 0 CF R par t 6 3 subpart KK , appendi xA

.

. Eac h contro l devic e use d t o compl ywit h a n percen t reductio n requirement , o ra poin t valu e limit

.

. Eac h contro l devic e use d t o compl ywit h a emissio n facto rlimi t fo rcontinuou s lamination/continuou s cast ing

. Determin e th e contro l effi
ciencyof eac h contro l de vic e use d t o contro l HA P emissions

. a . Determin e th e contro l ef
ficiencyof eac h contro l devic e use d t o contro l HA P emissions , o rdeter min e th e mas s HA P emissio n rat e a t th e con tro l devic e outlet

. Th e appropriat e tes t method s specifie d i n 4 0 CF R par

t 63 , subpart SS

. Th e appropriat e tes t method s specifie d i n 4 0 CF R par

t 6 3 subpar

t SS

. (1 ) Enclosure s tha t mee t th e require ment s fo ra permanen t tota l enclo sur e ar e assume d t o hav e a captur e efficiencyof 100%

. Enclosure s tha t d o no t mee t permanen t tota l enclo sur e requirement s mus t determin e th e captur e efficiencyb yconstructin g a temporarytota l enclosur e accordin g t o th e requirement s of EPAMetho d 20 4 an d measurin g th e mas s flo w rate s of th e HA P i n th e exhaus t stream s goin g t o th e atmospher e an d t o th e contro l device , or , (2 ) Us e a n alternativ e tes t metho d tha t meet s th e requirement s of 4 0 CF R par t 51 , appendi xM

. Follo wth e re quirement s i n l.a. i (1 ) an d (2 ) of thi s table

. Testin g an d evaluatio n requirement s ar e containe d i n 4 0 CF R par t 63 , subpar t SS

. Testin g an d evaluatio n requirement s are containe d i n 4 0 CF R par t 63 , subpart SS

.



### A s require di n § 63.5810(c) , whe n selectin g on e resi n poin t valu e fo

r multipl e operation s yo u mus t us e th e value s i nth e followin g table : TABL E 7 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—OPTION S ALLOWIN G US E O F TH E SAM E RESI N ACROS S DIFFEREN T OPERATION S THA TUS E TH E SAM E RESI N TYP E

I f you rfacilit yha s th e followin g resi n applicatio n

operatio n .. . Th e highes t resi n weigh t percen t HA P conten t yo u ca n us e fo r. . Th e poin t valu e assign d t o al l use s of thi s resi n i s . . . 1

. Corrosion-resistan t (CR ) nonatomize d mechanica l

2

. C R centrifuga l castin g a . C R mechanica l b

. C R filamen t windin g .. . c . C R manua l d

. C R centrifuga l castin g a . C R filamen t windin g .. . b

. C R manua l c . C R centrifuga l castin g 48. 3 48. 3 48. 3 48. 3 4 8 4 8 4 8 19 0

19 0 19 0 19 0 53 6 53 6 53 6

### 4036 0 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s TABL E 

### 7 T

O SUBPAR

T

### WWW W O F PART

### 63.—OPTION S ALLOWIN G US E O F TH E SAM E RESI N ACROS S DIFFEREN T 

### OPERATION S THA

TUS E TH E SAM E RESI N TYPE—Continue d

I f yourfacilit yha s th e followin g resi n applicatio n

operatio n . . . Th e highes t resi n weigh t percen t HA P conten t yo u ca n us e fo r.. .
4 2 4 2 4 5 4 5 4 5 14 4 14 4 14 4 11 0 11 0 35. 5 35. 5 33. 9 33. 6 55. 1 4 3 Th e poin t valu e assign d t o all use s o f thi s resi n I S . . . 16 3 16 3 17 8 17 8 17 8 42. 8 42. 8 42. 8 3 8 3 8 39 6 39 6 14 4 8 3 25 6 25 6 3

. C R filamen t windin g 4

. Non-C R filamen t windin g
5
. Non-C R nonatomize d fille d mechanica l

.. . 6

. Non-C R nonatomize d unfille d mechanica l 7
. Non-C R centrifuga l castin g 8

. Non-C R atomize d fille d mechanica l 9

. Non-C R manua l 10

. Toolin g nonatomize d mechanica l 11

. Toolin g atomize d mechanica l a . C R filamen t windin g b

. C R manua l a . Non-C R mechanica l (fille d o runfille d b

. non-C R manua l

. ' .'

. c . non-C R centrifuga l castin g a . non-C R nonatomize d unfille d mechanica l b

. non-C R manua l c . non-C R centrifuga l castin g a . non-C R manua l b

. non-C R centrifuga l castin g a . non-C R manua l b

. non-C R atomize d fille d mechanica l a . non-C R manua l a . Non-C R atomize d unfille d mechanica l

... . a . toolin g manua l :..:... a . toolin g manua l 

### A s require di n§ 63.5860(b) , yo u mus t demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit hemissio n limit s a s specifie di nth e followin g table : TABL E 

### 8 T O SUBPAR

T

### WWW W O F PART

### 63.—INITIA L COMPLIANC E WIT H EMISSIO N LIMIT S
For

. Tha t mus t mee t th e followin g emissio n limit

. . . .Yo u hav e demonstrate d initia l complianc e if

. . . 1

. Ope n moldin g an d centrifuga l castin g oper ations

.

2

. Ope n molding , centrifuga l casting , contin uou s lamination/casting , SM C manufacturin g mixing/BM C manufacturin g operations

. 3

. Continuou s lamination/castin g operation s .. .

4

. Continuou s lamination/castin g operation s a . Apoin t valu e emissio n limi t show n i n Tabl e 3 o r5 of thi s subpart

.

Reduc e tota l HA P emission s by.a t leas t 9 5 percen t b yweight

.

a . Reduc e tota l HA P emission s b ya t leas t 58. 5 weigh t percen t or .

b

. No t excee d a n emissio n limi t o f 15. 7 lbs

. o f HA P pe rto n of nea t resi n plu s an d neat ge l coa t plu s 9 5 percen t b yweight

.

a . Reduc e tota l HA P emission s b ya t leas t 9 5 weigh t percen t or . i

. Yo u hav e me t th e appropriat e poin t valu e fo rthes e operation s a s calculate d usin g th e procedure s i n §63.581 0 o n a 12-mont h roll in g averag e 1 yea rplu s 3 0 day s afte rth e appropriat e complianc e date , or , ii

. Yo u demonstrat e byusin g th e appropriat e poin t valu e mode l equation s i n Tabl e 1 tha t al l resin s an d ge l coat s considered,individ uall ymee t th e appropriat e poin t valu e emis sio n limit

. Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s o f th e captur e efficiencyan d destructio n effi
ciencytestin g specifie d i n Tabl e 6 of thi s subpart , ar e reduce d b ya t leas t 9 5 percen t • byweight

. Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s of th e captur e efficiencyan d destructio n effi
ciencytestin g specifie d i n Tabl e 6 of thi s subpart an d th e calculatio n procedure s specifie d i n §§63.586 5 throug h 63.5890 ,

. ar e reduce d bya t leas t 58. 5 percen t by weight

. Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s o f th e captur e efficiencyan d destructio n effi
ciencytestin g specifie d i n Tabl e 6 of thi s subpart an d th e calculatio n procedure s specifie d i n §§63.586 5 throug h 63.5890 , d o no t excee d 15. 7 lbs

. of HA P pe rto n o f neat resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plus

. Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s of th e captur e efficiencyan d destructio n effi
ciencytestin g specifie d i n Tabl e 6 of thi s subpar t an d th e calculation - procedure s specifie d i n §§63.586 5 throug h 63.5890 , ar e reduce d bya t leas t 9 5 percen t b y ' weigh t or ,P.4 0



### Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4036 1 TABL E 

### 8 TO SUBPAR

T

### WWW W O F PART

### 63.—INITIA L COMPLIANC E WIT H EMISSIO N 

### LIMITS—Continue d
For

. . .

5
. Pultrusio n operation s

6

. Pultrusio n operation s Tha t mus t mee t th e followin g emissio n limit

. . . b

. Not excee d a n emissio n limi t of 1.4 7 lbs

. o f HA P pe rto n o f neat resi n plu s an d neat ge l coa t plu s 9 5 percen t b yweight

.

a . Reduc e tota l HA P emission s byat leas t 6 0 percen t byweight

.

a . Reduc e tota l HA P emission s b yat leas t 9 5 percen t b yweight

. Yo u hav e demonstrate d initia l complianc e if

. . . Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s of th e captur e efficiencyan d destructio n effi
ciencytestin g specifie d i n Tabl e 5 an d th e calculatio n procedure s specifie d i n §§63.5865-63.5890 , d o no t excee d 1.47 lbs

. of HA P pe rto n of neat resi n plu s a n nea t ge l coa t plus

. i

. Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s of th e captur e efficiencyan d add-o n contro l devic e destructio n efficiencytestin g speci fie d i n Tabl e 6 of thi s subpart , ar e reduce d b ya t leas t 6 0 percen t byweight , o r ii

. A s par

t of th e notificatio n of initia l compli anc e status , th e owner/operato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t tha t al l pultrusio n line s no t controlle d wit h add-o n contro l devic e ar e usin g direct di e injectio n and/o rwet are a enclosure s tha t mee t • th e criteri a o f §63.5825

. i

. Tota l HA P emissions , base d o n th e result s of th e captur e efficiencyan d add-o n contro l devic e destructio n efficiencytestin g speci fie d i n Tabl e 6 of thi s subpart , ar e reduce d bya t leas t 9 5 percen t byweight , or , ii

. A s par

t of th e notificatio n of initia l compli anc e status , th e owner/operato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t tha t al l pultrusio n line s no t controlle d b ya n add-o n contro l devic e ar e usin g direc t di e injectio n tha t mee t th e criteri a of §63.5825

. 

### A s require di n§ 63.5860(b) , yo u mus t demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit h wor k practic e standard s a s specifie di n th e followin g table : TABL E 

### 9 T O SUBPART

### WWW W O F PART

### 63.—INITIA L COMPLIANC E WIT H WOR KPRACTIC E STANDARD S
For

. Tha t mus t mee t th e followin g standar d

. Yo u hav e demonstrate d initia l complianc e if

. . . 1

. Anewo rexistin g close d moldin g operatio n usin g compression/injectio n molding

.

2

. A n existin g SM C manufacturin g operatio n

3

. A n existin g SM C manufacturin g operatio n

4

. A n existin g SM C manufacturin g operatio n

5
. Ane wo rexistin g BM C manufacturing/mixin g operation

. 6

. A n existin g BM C manufacturing/mixin g oper ation

. Uncover , unwra p o rexpos e onl yon e charg e pe rmol d cycl e pe rcompression/injectio n moldin g machine

. Clos e o rcove rth e docto rbo xo n eac h SM C manufacturin g machine

. Fol d edge s o f SM C prio rt o storag e and/o r transport
. Us e nylo n fil m o ra fil m wit h a n equa l o rlowe r permeabilit yt o styren e tha n nylo n t o en clos e SMC

. Us e mixe rcover s wit h n o visibl e gap s presen t i n th e mixe rcovers . Kee p th e mixe rcover s close d durin g mixin g excep t whe n addin g material s t o th e mixers

. Th e owne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e of complianc e statu s tha t onl yon e charg e i s uncovered , un wrappe d o rexpose d pe rmol d cycl e pe r compression/injectio n moldin g machine

. Th e onwne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e of complianc e statu s tha t th e docto rboxo n eac h SM C manufac
turin g machin e i s close d o rcovered

. Th e owne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e of complianc e statu s tha t th e edge s of SM C ar e folde d prio rt o storag e and/o rtransport
. Th e owne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e of complianc e statu s tha t a nylo n fil m o rfil m wit h a n equa l o r lowe rpermeabilit yt o styren e tha n nylo n i s use d t o enclos e SMC

. Th e owne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e of complianc e statu s tha t eac h mixe ri s equippe d wit h a cove r tha t doe s no t contai n an yvisibl e gaps . Th e owne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e of complianc e statu s tha t mixe rcover s ar e close d durin g mixin g excep t whe n addin g material s t o th e mix ers .

### 4036 2 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s P.4 1

TABL E 9 T O SUBPAR TWWW W O F PAR T63.—INITIA L COMPLIANC E WIT H WOR KPRACTIC E STANDARDS—Continue d

For.:

. 7
. A n existin g BM C manufacturing/mixin g Tha t mus t mee t th e followin g standar d

. . . No t activel yven t mixer s t o th e atmospher e ... . Yo u hav e demonstrate d initia l complianc e if

. . . Th e owne ro roperato rsubmit s a certifie d statemen t i n th e notic e o f complianc e statu s

. tha t mixer s ar e no t activel yvente d t o th e atmosphere

. 

### A s require di n § 63.5865(a) , i n orde r t o compl y wit hapercen t reductio n limi t

fo r continuou s laminatio n line s an dcontinuou s castin g line s yo u mus t determin e th e dat ai n th e followin g table : TABL E 1 0 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—DAT AREQUIREMENT S FO R NE W AN D EXISTIN G CONTINUOU S LAMINATIO N LINE S AN D CONTINUOU S CASTIN G LINE S COMPLYIN G WIT H A PERCEN TREDUCTION.LIMI TO N A PE R LIN E BASI S Fo reac h lin e wher e th e wet-ou t ^re a An d th e ove n Yo u mus t determin e . 1

. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s rio t a PT E an d th e capture d emission s ar e controlle d b ya n add o n contro l device

. a . I s uncontrolle d

2

. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s a PT E an d th e cap ture d emission s ar e controlle d b ya n add-o n contro l device

. a . I s uncontrolle d

3

. I s uncontrolle d a . I s controlle d bya n add-o n contro l devic e

4

. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t isno t a PT E an d th e capture d emission s ar e controlle d b ya n add o n contro l device

. a . I s controlle d b ya n add-o n contro l devic e

5
. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s a PT E an d th e cap ture d emission s are controlle d b ya n add-o n contro l device

. a . I s controlle d bya n add-o n contro l devic e i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l controlle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; iii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Th e captur e efficiencyof th e wet-ou t are a enclosure ; v . The " destructio n efficiencyof th e add-o n contro l device ; an d * vi

. Th e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions; ' ii

. Annua l controlle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; iii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Tha t th e wet-ou t are a enclosur e meet s th e requirement s of Metho d 20 4 fo ra PTE ; v . Th e destructio n efficiencyof th e add-o n contro l device ; an d vi

. Th e amoun t of neat resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iii

. Annua l controlle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Th e captur e efficiencyof th e oven ; v . Th e destructio n efficiencyof th e add-o n contro l device ; an d vi

. Th e amount"o f neat resi n plu s an d neat ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l controlle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; iii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Annua l controlle d ove n emissions ; v . Th e captur e efficiencyof th e wet-ou t are a enclosure ; vi

. Inle t emission s t o th e add-o n contro l de vice ; vii

. Outle t emission s fro m th e add-o n contro l device ; an d viii

. fh e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s applie d i

. Tha t th e wet-ou t are a enclosur e meet s th e requirement s of Metho d 20 4 fo ra PTE ; ii

. Th e captur e efficiencyo f th e oven ; an d iii

. Th e destructio n efficiencyof th e add-o n contro l device

. 

### A s require di n §63.5865 , i n orde r t o compl y wit hapercen t reductio n limi t

or albs/to n limi t

o n an averagin g basi s fo r continuou s laminatio n line s an dcontinuou s castin g line s yo u mus t determin e th e dat ai n th e followin g table : TABL E 1 1 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—DAT AREQUIREMENT S FO R NE W AN D EXISTIN G CONTINUOU S LAMINATIO N AN D CONTINUOU S CASTIN G LINE S COMPLYIN G WIT H A PERCEN TREDUCTIO N LIMI TO R A LBS/TO N LIMI TO N A N AVER AGIN G BASI S

. Fo reac h

.. . 1

. Wet-ou t are a That

. . . I s uncontrolle d Yo u mus t determin e Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions

.P.4 2



### Federa l Register /Vol,
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4036 3
TABL E 1 1 T O SUBPAR TWWW W O F PAR T63.—DAT AREQUIREMENT S FO R NE W AN D EXISTIN G CONTINUOU S LAMINATIO N AN D CONTINUOU S CASTIN G LINE S COMPLYIN G WIT H A PERCEN TREDUCTIO N LIMI TO R A LBS/TO N LIMI TO N A N AVER AGIN G BASIS—Continue d

Fo reac h -

. . . 2

. Wet-ou t are a ;....-.... . 3

. Wet-ou t are a 4

. Ove n 5. Lin e 6

. Add-o n contro l devic e That

. a . Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s no t a PT E
Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s a PT E I s uncontrolle d

.. : a . I s controlle d o runcontrolle d N/ A'. Yo u mus t determin e i

. Th e captur e efficiencyof th e enclosure ; an d ii

. Annua l emission s tha t escap e th e enclo sure . Tha t th e enclosur e meet s th e requirement s o f Metho d 20 4 fo ra PTE

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions

. J

. Th e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s applied ; an d ii

. Th e amoun t of nea t ge l coa t plu s applied

. Tota l annua l inle t emissions ; an d tota l annua l o n outle t emissions

. 

### A s require di n § 63.5865(b) , i n orde r t o compl y witj halbs/to n emissio n limi t fo r continuou s laminatio n line s an d continuou s castin g line s yo u mus t determin e th e dat ai n th e followin g table : TABL E 1 2 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—DAT AREQUIREMENT S FO R NE W AN D EXISTIN G CONTINUOU S LAMINATIO N

LINE S AN D CONTINUOU S CASTIN G LINE S COMPLYIN G WIT H A LBS/TO N O N A PE R LIN E BASI S Fo reac h lin e wher e th e wet-ou t are a An d th e ove n Yo u mus t determin e . 1

. I s uncontrolled

.

2

. Ha s a n enclosur e that-i s no t a PTE , an d th e capture d emission s ar e controlle d b ya n add o n contro l device

. a . I s uncontrolle d

a . I s uncontrolle d

3

. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s a PTE , an d th e capture d emission s ar e controlle d b ya n add o n contro l device

. a . I s uncontrolle d

4

. I s uncontrolle d a . I s controlle d b ya n add-o n contro l devic e

5
. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s no t a PT E an d th e capture d emission s ar e controlle d b ya n add o n contro l device

. a . I s controlle d bya n add-o n contro l devic e

6

. Ha s a n enclosur e tha t i s a PTE , an d th e capture d emission s ar e controlle d b yar i add o n contro l device

. a . I s controlle d b ya n add-o n contro l devic e i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; an d iii

. Annua l nea t resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l controlle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; iii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Th e captur e efficiencyof th e wet-ou t are a controlle d enclosure ; v . Th e destructio n efficiencyo f th e add-o n contro l device ; an d vi

. Th e amoun t of neat resi n plu s an d neat ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l controlle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; iii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Tha t th e wet-ou t are a enclosur e meet s th e requirement s o f Metho d 20 4 fo ra PTE ; v . Th e destructio n efficiencyo f th e add-o n contro l device ; an d vi

. Th e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iii

. Annua l controlle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Th e captur e efficiencyo f th e oven ; v . Th e destructio n efficiencyo f the

. add-o n contro l device ; an d vi

. Th e amoun t o f nea t resi n plu s an d nea t ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Annua l uncontrolle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; ii

. Annua l controlle d wet-ou t are a emissions ; iii

. Annua l uncontrolle d ove n emissions ; iv

. Annua l controlle d ove n emissions ; v . Th e captur e efficiencyof th e wet-ou t are a contro l enclosure ; vi

. Th e captur e efficiencyof th e oven ; vii

. Th e destructio n efficiencyof th e add-o n contro l device ; an d viii

. Th e amoun t of neat resi n plu s an d neat ge l coa t plu s applied , i

. Tha t th e wet-ou t are a enclosur e meet s th e requirement s of Metho d 20 4 fo ra PTE ; ii

. Th e captur e efficiencyof th e oven ; iii

. Inle t emission s t o th e add-o n contro l ar e device ; an d iv

. Outle t emission s fro m th e add-o n contro l contro l device

.P.4 3


### 4036 4 Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s A s require di n§63.5905 , yo u mus t determin e th e applicabl e notification s an dsubmi t the mb y th e date s show n i nth e followin g table : -

TABL E 

### 1 3 T

O SUBPAR

T

### WWW W O F PART63.—APPLICABILIT YAN D TIMIN G O F NOTIFICATION S I f you rfacilit y. 1

. I s a n existin g sourc e subjec t t o thi s regula tion

. 2

. I s a ne wsourc e subject t o thi s regulatio n a s 3

. Qualifie s fo ra complianc e extensio n specifie d i n § 63.9(c ) of subpart A

. 4

. I s complyin g wit h mode l poin t valu e aver agin g provisions

. 5
. I s complyin g wit h HA P conten t limits , appli catio n equipmen t requirements , o remissio n limi t othe rtha n mode l poin t valu e averaging

. 6

. I s complyin g b yusin g a n ad d = o n contro l device

. Yo u mus t submi t A n Initia l Notificatio n containin g th e informa
tio n specifie d i n § 63.9(b)(2)

. Th e notification s specifie d i n § 63.9(b)(3 ) t o (5)

. Areques t fo ra complianc e extensio n a s specifie d i n § 63.9(c)

. ANotificatio n of Complianc e Statu s a s speci fie d i n § 63.9(h). " ANotificatio n o f Complianc e Statu s a s speci fie d i n § 63.9(h)

. a . Anotificatio n of inten t <t o conduc t a per formanc e tes t a s specifie d i n § 63.9(e)

. b

. Anotificatio n of th e dat e fo rth e CM S per formanc e evaluatio n a s specifie d i n § 63.9(g)

. c . ANotificatio n of Complianc e Statu s a s specifie d i n § 63.9(h)

. Bythi s dat e . N o late rtha n th e date s specifie d i n § 63.9(b)(2)

. N o late rtha n th e date s specifie d i n §63.9(b)(4)and(5)

. N o late rtha n th e date s specifie d i n § 63.9(i)

. N o late rtha n 1 yea rplu s 3 0 day s afte ryou r facility' s complianc e date

. N o late rtha n 3 0 calenda rday s afte rfacility' s complianc e date

. N o late rtha n th e dat e specifie d i n §63.9(e)

. Th e dat e of submissio n o f notificatio n of inten t t o conduc t a performance , test
. N o late rtha n 6 0 calenda rday s afte rth e com pletio n of th e add-o n contro l devic e per formanc e tes t an d CM S performanc e eval uation

. 

# I

A s require di n§ 63.5910(a) throug h(b ) an d(f ) throug h(g) , yo u mus t submi t report s o nth e schedul e show n i n th e followin g table : TABL E 

### 1 4 T O SUBPAR

T

### WWW W O F PART63.—REQUIREMENT S FO R REPORTS Yo u mus t submi t a(n ) 1

. Complianc e repor

t

2

. A n immediat e startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n repor t i f yo u ha d a startup , shutdown , o rmalfunctio n durin g th e reportin g perio d tha t i s no t consisten t wit h you rstartup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n plan

. Th e report mus t contai n a . Astatemen t tha t ther e wer e n o deviation s durin g tha t reportin g perio d i f ther e wer e n o deviation s fro m an y emissio n limitation s (emissio n limit , operatin g limit , opacit ylimit , an d visibl e emissio n limit ) tha t appl yt o yo u an d ther e wer e n o deviation s fro m th e require - ' ment s fo rwor k

practic e standard s i n Tabl e 4 o f thi s subpart tha t appl yt o you . I f ther e wer e n o period s durin g whic h th e CMS , includin g CEMS , an d oper atin g paramete rmonitorin g systems , wa s ou t of con tro l a s specifie d i n § 63.8(c)(7) , th e repor t mus t als o contai n a statemen t tha t ther e wer e n o period s dur in g whic h th e CM S wa s ou t of contro l durin g th e re portin g period

. b

. Th e informatio n i n §63.5910(d ) i f yo u hav e a devi atio n fro m an yemissio n th e limitatio n (emissio n limit , operatin g limit , o rwor k

practic e standard ) durin g th e reportin g period

. I f ther e wer e period s durin g whic h th e CMS , includin g CEMS , an d operatin g paramete r monitorin g systems , wa s ou t of control , a s specifie d i n § 63.8(c)(7) , th e repor t mus t contai n th e infonna
tio n i n § 63.5910(e)

. c . Th e informatio n i n §63.10(d)(5)(i)

. I f yo u ha d a start up , shutdow n o rmalfunctio n durin g th e reportin g pe riod , an d yo u too k

action s consisten t wit h you rstart up , shutdown , an d malfunctio n plan

. a . Action s take n fo rth e event
.

b

. Th e informatio n i n § 63.10(d)(5)(ii)

. Yo u mus t submi t th e repor t Semiannuall yaccordin g t o th e requirement s i n §63.5910(b)

.

Semiannuall yaccordin g t o th e requirement s i n §63.5910(b)

.

Semiannuall yaccordin g t o th e requirement s ' i n §63.5910(b)

. Byfa xo rtelephon e withi n 2 workin g day s afte rstartin g action s inconsisten t wit h th e plan

.

Bylette rwithi n 7 workin g day s afte rth e en d of th e even t unles s yo u hav e mad e alternativ e arrange ment s wit h th e permittin g authority

. (§63.10(d)(5)(ii))

. 

### A s specifie di n§63.5925 , th e part s o f th e General Provision s whic happl y t o yo u ar e show n i nth e followin g table :P.4 4



### Federa l Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4036 5
TABL E 1 5 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—APPLICABILIT YO F GENERA L PROVISION S (SUBPAR TA) T O SUBPAR T WWWW O F PAR T6 3

' Th e genera l provision s ref
erenc e . . . §63. 1 (a)(1 )

§63.1(a)(2 ) throug h (4 ) i §63.1(a)(5 ) §63.1(a)(6 ) throug h (7 ) §63. 1 (a)(8 ) §63.1(a)(9 ) §63.1(a)(10 ) throug h (14 )

.. . §63.1(b)(1 ) §63.1(b)(2 ) §6 3 1(b)(3 ) •563.1(c)(1 )
§63. 1 (c)(2 )
•563.1(c)(3 ) §63.1(C)(4 ) §63.1(c)(5 ) §63.1(d ) §63.1(e ) §63. 2

§63. 3 §63. 4 § 63.5(a)(1 ) throug h (2 ) §63.5(b)(1 ) §63.5(b)(2) ' •563.5(b)(3 ) §63.5(b)(4 ) §63.5(b)(5 )


### « , 56 3 5(b)(6 ) Genera l applicabilit yof th e genera l pro visions

.
Genera l applicabilit yof th e genera l pro visions

. Reserve d Genera l applicabilit yof th e genera l pro visions

. Genera l applicabilit yo f th e genera l pro visions

. Reserve d Genera l applicabilit yof th e genera l pro visions

. Initia l applicabilit ydeterminatio n Titl e V operatin g permi t requiremen t Recor d o f th e applicabilit ydeterminatio n Applicabilit yof thi s par t afte ra relevan t
v > standar d ha s bee n se t unde rthi s part
. Titl e V-operatin g permi t requiremen t

Reserve d Requirement s fo ra n existin g sourc e tha t obtain s a n extensio n of compliance

. Notificatio n requirement s fo ra n are a sourc e tha t increase s HA P emission s t o majo rsourc e levels

. Reserve d Applicabilit yof permi t progra m befor e a relevan t standar d ha s bee n se t unde r thi s part
. Definition s

Unit s an d abbreviation s Prohibite d activitie s an d circumventio n .. . Applicabilit yof constructio n an d recon struction

. Relevan t standard s fo rne wsource s upo n construction

. Reserve d Ne wconstruction/reconstructe d Construction/reconstructio n notificatio n . . Construction/reconstructio n complianc e Equipmen t additio n o rproces s chang e . . An d applie s t o subpart WWWW o f Par

t 6 3

. . . Ye s

Yes

. No

. • Yes. * Yes

. No

. Yes

. Ye s Ye s Yes

. Ye s

Ye s

No

. » Yes

. Yes

. No

. Yes

. Ye s

Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s No

. Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Subject t o th e followin g additiona l informatio n . . . Additiona l term s define d i n subpar t WWWW of Par

t 63 ; whe n overla p be twee n subpart s Aan d WWWW of Par t 6 3 o f thi s part , subpart WWWW o f Par t 6 3 take s precedence

.

Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 clarifie s th e applicabilit yi n §§63.578 0 an d 63.5785

. Al l majo raffecte d source s ar e require d t o obtai n a titl e V permit

. Subpar t WWWW of Par

t 6 3 clarifie s th e applicabilit yof eac h paragrap h o f sub par t At o source s subject t o subpart WWWW of Par

t 63

. Al l majo raffecte d source s ar e require d t o obtai n a titl e V operatin g permit

. Are a source s ar e no t subject t o sub par t WWWW of Par

t 63

.

Subpart WWWW o f Par t 6 3 define s term s i n §63.5935

. Whe n overla p be twee n subpart s Aan d WWWW o f Par t 6 3 occurs , yo u mus t compl ywit h th e subpar t WWWW of Par

t 6 3 definitions , whic h tak e precedenc e ove rth e sub par t Adefinitions

. Othe runit s an d abbreviation s use d i n subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 ar e de fine d i n subpart WWW

W of Par t 63

. § 63.4(a)(4 ) i s reserve d an d doe s no t apply

. Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpart WWWW o f Par t 63

. Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpart WWWW o f Par t 63

. Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpar t WWWW of Par t 63

. Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpart WWWW o f Par t 63

. Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpar t WWWW o f Par t 63

. Existin g facilitie s d o not becom e recon structe d unde rsubpar t WWWW of Par t 63

.

### 4036 6 Federal Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s TABL E 

### 1 5 T

O SUBPAR

T

### WWW W O F PART

### 63.—APPLICABILIT YO F GENERA L PROVISION S (SUBPART

### A ) T O SUBPART 

### WWW W O F PART

### 63—Continue d Th e genera l provision s ref
erenc e .. . §63.5(c ) §63.5(d)(1 ) §63.5(d)(2 ) 663.5(d)(3 ) §63.5(d)(4 ) § 63.5(e)(1 ) throug h (5 ) § 63.5(f)(1 ) throug h (2 ) §63.6(a)(1 ) §63.6(a)(2 ) §63.6(b)(1 ) throug h (2 ) §63.6(b)(3 ) throug h (5 ) ..:... . §63.6(0(6 ) §63.6(b)(7 )
§63.6(c)(1 ) throug h (2 ) §63.6(c)(3 ) throug h (4 ) §63.6(c)(5 ) §63.6(d ) § 63.6(e)(1 ) throug h (2 ) §63.6(e)(3 )
§63.6(f)(1 ) .-.
§'63.6(f)(23 ) § 63.6(g)(1 ) throug h (3 ) §63.6(h ) §63.6(i)(1 ) throug h (14 ) §63.6(i)(15 ) §63.6(0(16 ) §63.6(i ) §63.7(a)(1 ) §63.7(a)(2 ) §63.7(a)(3 ) 663.7(b)(1 ) §63.7(b)(2 ) §63.7(c ) §63.7(d ) §63:7(e)(1 ) throug h (4 )

§63.7(f ) Reserve d < Genera l applicatio n fo rapprova l of con structio n o rreconstruction

. . Applicatio n fo rapprova l of constructio n . . Applicatio n fo rapprova l of reconstructio n Additiona l informatio n Approva l o f constructio n o rreconstruc Approva l of constructio n o rreconstruc tio n base d o n prio rStat e preconstructio n review

. Applicabilit yo f complianc e wit h stand ard s an d maintenanc e requirements

. Applicabilit yof are a source s tha t in creas e emission s t o becom e majo r sources . Complianc e date s fo rnewan d recon structe d sources . Complianc e date s fo rare a source s tha t becom e majo rsources . Reserve d Complianc e date s fo rne wsource s re sultin g fro m newunaffecte d are a source s becomin g subject t o stand ards

. Complianc e date s fo rexistin g source s .. . Reserve d , Complianc e date s fo rexistin g are a source s tha t becom e major

. Reserve d Operatio n & maintenanc e requirement s Startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n an d recordkeeping

. Complianc e excep t durin g period s o f startup , shutdown , an d malfunction

.
.Method s fo rdeterminin g complianc e Alternativ e standar d Opacit yan d visibl e emissio n Standard s Complianc e extension s Reserve d

. - Complianc e extension s Presidentia l complianc e exemptio n Applicabilit yof performanc e testin g re quirements

. Performanc e tes t date s Sectio n 11 4 authorit y Notificatio n o f performanc e tes t Notificatio n o f reschedule d performanc e test
. Qualit yassuranc e program , includin g tes t plan

. Performanc e testin g facilitie s Condition s fo rconductin g performanc e tests
.
Us e of alternativ e tes t metho d An d applie s t o subpar t WWW W of Par t 6 3

. . . No

. Ye s 

### " Yes

. No

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Ye s Ye s E No

. Ye s

Ye s No

. Ye s '

. No

. Yes

. Ye s

N o

Yes

. Yes

. N o Yes

. No

. Yes

. Ye s Yes

. N o Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Ye s Yes

. Ye s

Yes

. Subject t o th e followin g additiona l informatio n .. . Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpart WWWW of Part 63

.



### .

.

Subpart WWWW o f Par t 6 3 clarifie s complianc e date s i n §63.5800

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 clarifie s complianc e date s i n §63.5800

. Subpart WWW W o f Par t 6 3 clarifie s complianc e date s i n §63.5800

. Subpart WWWW o f Part 6 3 clarifie s complianc e date s i n §63.5800

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 clarifie s complianc e date s i n § 63.5800 : Subpart WWWW o f Par t 6 3 require s a startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n pla n onl yfo rsource s usin g add-o n controls

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 require s complianc e durin g period s o f startup , shutdown , an d malfunctions , excep t startup , shutdown , an d malfunction s fo rsource s usin g add-o n controls

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 doe s no t contai n opacit yo rvisibl e emissio n standards

.

Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 initia l com plianc e requirement s ar e i n §63.5840

.



### . • Excep t tha t th e tes t pla n mus t b e sub mitte d wit h th e notificatio n of th e per formanc e test
. Performanc e tes t requirement s ar e con taine d i n §63.5850

. Additiona l require ment s fo rconductin g performanc e test s fo rcontinuous - lamination/castin g ar e include d i n §63.5865

.P.4 6



### Federa l Register /Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s 4036 7 TABL E 

### 1 5 TO SUBPART

### WWW W O F PART

### 63.—APPLICABILIT YO F GENERA L PROVISION S (SUBPART

### A ) TO SUBPART 

### WWW W O F PART

### 63—Continue d Th e genera l provision s ref
erenc e . . . Tha t addresse s . An d applie s t o subpart WWWW of Par

t 6 3

. . . Subject t o th e followin g additiona l informatio n . . . §63.7(g ) §63.7(h ) § 63.8(a)(1 ) throug h (2 ) § 63.8(a)(3 ) §63.8(a)(4 ) §63.8(b)(1 ) §63.8(b)(2 ) throug h (3 ) §63.8(c)(1)(i )

_ . §63.8(0( 1 )(ii ) § 63.8(0( 1 )(iii

) .:.... . §63.8(0(2 ) throug h (3 ) §63.8(0(4 ) § 63.8(c)(5 ) §63.8(0(6 ) throug h (8 ) §63.8(d ) ., : §63.8(e)(1 ) §63.8(0(2 ) § 63.8(e)(3 ) throug h (4 ) §63.8(e)(5)(i ) § 63.8(e)(5)(H) § 63.8(f)(1 ) throug h (3 ) §63.8(f)(4 ) § 63.8(f)(5 ) § 63.8(f)(6 ) § 63.8(g)(1 ) throug h (5 ) § 63.9(a)(1 ) throug h (4 ) §63.9(0(1 ) §63.9(b)(2 ) §63.9(0(3 ) Performanc e tes t dat a analysis , record keeping , an d reporting

. Waive ro f performanc e test s Applicabilit yof monitorin g requirement s Reserve d Monitorin g requirement s whe n usin g flares

. Conduct o f monitorin g exception s Multipl e effluent s an d multipl e monitorin g systems
. Ensur e immediat e repai ro rreplacemen t of CM S part s t o correc t "routine' ' o r otherwis e predictabl e malfunctions

. Repor t CM S malfunction s tha t ar e no t addresse d b yth e startup , shutdown , and-malfunctio n plan

. Complianc e wit h CM S operatio n an d maintenanc e requirements

. Monitorin g syste m installatio n CM S requirement s COM S minimu m procedure s CM S calibratio n an d period s CM S i s ou t of control

. CM S qualit ycontro l program , includin g curren t tes t pla n an d all previou s versions

. Performanc e evaluatio n o f CM S
Notificatio n of performanc e evaluatio n CM S requirements/alternative s Reportin g performanc e evaluatio n re sults

. Result s o f COM S performanc e evalua tion

. Us e o f a n alternativ e monitorin g metho d Reques t t o us e a n alternativ e monitorin g method

. Approva l of reques t t o us e a n alternativ e monitorin g method

. Reques t fo ralternativ e t o relativ e accu - ' racytes t an d associate d records

. Dat a reductio n Notificatio n requirement s an d genera l in formation

. Initia l notificatio n applicabilit y Notificatio n fo raffecte d sourc e wit h initia l startu p befor e effectiv e dat e o f stand ard

. Notificatio n tha t subject t o th e rul e fo r ne wo rreconstructe d affecte d sourc e wit h initia l startu p afte reffectiv e dat e an d fo rwhic h a n applicatio n fo rap prova l of constructio n o rreconstruc tio n i s no t required

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. No

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s N o . . Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s N o . . Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes '
Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a • CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 doe s no t contai n opacit ystandards

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 does no t contai n opacit ystandards

.

Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a •CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

.

### 4036 8 Federal Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 200 1 /Propose dRule s TABL E 

### 1 5 T

O SUBPART

" 

### WWW W O F PART63.^-APPLICABILIT YO F GENERA L PROVISION S (SUBPART

### A ) T O SUBPART 

### WWW W O F PART

### 63—Continue d Th e genera l provision s ref
erenc e . . . §63.9(b)(4)(i ) throug h (iii )

... .
§63.9(b)(4)(iv ) §63.9(b)(4)(v )

§63.9(0(5 ) §63.9(c ) §63.9(d ) §63.9(e ) §63.9(f ) §63.9(g)(1 )

..... '



### - §63.9(g)(2 ) §63.9(g)(3 ) §63.9(h)(1 ) throug h (3 ) §63.9(h)(4 ) §63.9(h)(5 ) throug h (6 ) §63.9(i ) £• §63.9(j ) §63.10(a)(1 ) throug h (7 ) §63.10(b)(1 ) § 63E10(b)(2)(i ) throug h (v)

. . § 63.10(b)(2)(vi ) throug h (xi ) §63.10(b)(2)(xii ) §63.10(b)(2)(xiii ) §63.10(b)(2)(xiv ) §63.10(b)(3 ) §63.10(0(1 ) §63.10(0(2 ) throug h (4 ) §63.10(0(5 ) throug h (8 ) §63.10(0(9 ) : §63.10(d)(1 ) §63.10(0(2 ) §63.10(d)(3 ) §63.10(d)(4 ) §63.10(d)(5 ) §63.10(e)(1 ) throug h (3 ) Tha t addresse s . . . Notificatio n fo ra ne wo rreconstructe d majo raffecte d sourc e wit h initia l start u p afte reffectiv e dat e fo rwhic h a n ap plicatio n fo rapprova l of constructio n o rreconstructio n i s required

. Reserve d Notificatio n fo ra ne wo rreconstructe d majo raffecte d sourc e wit h initia l start u p afte reffectiv e dat e fo rwhic h a n ap plicatio n fo rapprova l of constructio n o rreconstructio n i s required

. Afte reffectiv e dat e of standard , notifica
tio n o f intende d constructio n o rrecon- ' struction

. . Reques t fo rcomplianc e extensio n Notificatio n o

f specia l complianc e re quirement s fo rnewsource . Notificatio n o f performanc e tes t Notificatio n of opacit yan d visibl e emis sion s observations

. Additiona l notificatio n requirement s fo r source s usin g CMS

. Notificatio n of complianc e wit h opacit y emissio n standard

. Notificatio n tha t criterio n t o continu e us e o f alternativ e t o relativ e accuracytest in g ha s bee n exceeded

. Notificatio n of complianc e statu s Reserve d Notificatio n o f complianc e statu s Adjustmen t of submitta l deadline s Chang e i n informatio n provide d Applicabilit yo

f recordkeepin g an d report ing

. Record s retentio n Record s relate d t o startup , shutdown , an d malfunction

. CM S record s Recor d of waive ro f recordkeepin g an d reporting

. Recor d fo ralternativ e t o th e relativ e ac curacytest
. Record s supportin g initia l notificatio n an d notificatio n o f complianc e status
. Record s fo rapplicabilit ydetermination s CM S record s Reserve d CM S record s Reserve d Genera l reporting , requirement s Repor t of performanc e tes t result s Reportin g result s of opacityo rvisibl e emissio n observations

. Progres s report s a s par t of extensio n o f compliance

. Startup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n re ports
. Additiona l reportin g requirement s fo r CMS

. An d applie s t o subpart WWW W of Par t 6 3

. . . Yes

. '

No

. Ye s

Yes

. ... : Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. N o Ye s ..; . ~ N o Ye s Yes

. No

. Yes

. Yes

. . Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Ye s .- . Ye s Yes

. Ye s Yes

. Yes

. Ye s No

. Ye s .... : No

. Yes

. Yes

. N o Yes

. Ye s Ye s ....= : • Subject t o th e followin g additiona l informatio n . . .

Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpart WWW W of Par t 63

. Existin g facilitie s d o no t becom e recon structe d unde rsubpart WWW W o f Par t 63

.
Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 doe s no t contai n opacit yo rvisibl e emissio n standards

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Subpart WWWW of Par t 6 3 doe s no t contai n opacit yemissio n standards

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect us e a CM S t o demonstrate - continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

.

Onl yapplie s t o facilitie s tha t us e a n add o n contro l device

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

.



### " Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u elect t o us e a CM S t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

. . Subpar t WWWW of Par

t 6 3 doe s no t contai n opacit yo rvisibl e emissio n standards

. Onl yapplie s i f yo u use-a n add-o n con tro l device

. Thi s sectio n applie s i f yo u hav e a n add o n contro l devic e an d elect t o us e a CE M t o demonstrat e continuou s com plianc e wit h a n emissio n limit

.P.4 8



### Federal Register/Vol
. 66 , No
. 149/Thursday , Augus t 2 , 2001/Propose dRule s 4036 9

. TABL E 1 5 T O SUBPAR TWWWW O F PAR T63.—APPLICABILIT YO F GENERA L PROVISION S (SUBPAR TA ) T O SUBPAR T 

### WWWW O F PAR T

### 63—Continue d Th e genera l provision s ref
erenc e .. . 663.10(e)(4 ) §63.10(f ) §63.1 1 §63.1 2 §63.1 3 §63.1 4 §63.1 5 Tha t addresse s . . . Reportin g COM S dat a Waive rfo rrecordkeepin g o rreportin g ... . Contro l devic e requirement s Stat e authorit yan d delegation s Addresse s o

f Stat e ai rpollutio n contro l agencie s an d EPARegiona l Offices

. Incorporation s b yreferenc e Availabilit yof informatio n an d confiden
tiality

. An d applie s t o subpart WWWW o f Par

t 6 3

. . . N o Yes

. Ye s Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Subject t o th e followin g additiona l informatio n . . . Subpar t WWW W of Par

t 6 3 doe s no t • dat a contai n opacitystandards

. Onl yapplie s i f yo u elect t o us e a flar e a s a contro l device

.

[FRDoc
. 01-1756 4 File d8-1-01 ; 8:4 5 am ] BILLIN G COD E 6560-50- P