alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**AMENDMENT** dated
      as
      of February 23, 2007 to the Employment Agreement dated as of May 9, 2006 (the
      “ Agreement ”)
      between inVentiv Health, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Eran Broshy.




In
      consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties agree as follows:




**Section
      1.**  **Bonus** .
      Section
      4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
      follows:




Executive
      shall be eligible for a bonus in each calendar year, based on Executive’s
      success in reaching or exceeding performance objectives as determined by the
      Board (the “Bonus”). Executive’s target Bonus shall be determined by the Board
      and shall be no less than 100% of Executive’s then current salary. The amount of
      the Bonus, if any, that is actually awarded shall be determined at the
      discretion of the Board. All or any portion of the Bonus may be awarded pursuant
      to a plan satisfying the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
      Code of 1986, as amended.




**Section
      2.**  **Ratification** .
      Except
      as aforesaid, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance
      with its terms.




**Section
      3.**  **Governing
      Law** .
      This
      Agreement shall be construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the
      laws of the State of New York, without regard to its conflict of law
      principles.




**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written
      above.







**inVentiv
                Health, Inc.**
              
              By:
                /s/ Per G.H. Lofberg
              
              Name:
                Per G.H. Lofberg
              Member,
                Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
            By:
                  /s/ Eran Broshy
              Eran
                BroshyBy:
                  /s/ Mark Jennings
              
              Name:
                Mark Jennings
              Member,
                Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
Jean G. DENIS, a/k/a Jean Georges Denis, a/k/a Jean Denis, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1664

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 1757

In re: DAVID HILL , Petitioner.

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria . ( 1:01

- cr - 00191

- CMH

- 1 )

Submitted : September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1757 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to grant Hill’s motions for relief from judgment in a civil action and for reconsideration of the court’s order imposing a prefiling injunction (PFI) in his criminal

case. We conclude that Hill is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), and we previously affirmed the district court’s order denying Hill’s motions, see United States v. Hill , No. 23

- 7052, 2024 WL 1406218 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2024). T o the extent that the instant petition also contains substantive challenges to the PFI, we observe that Hill has already unsuccessfully challenged the PFI on appeal , see United States v. Hill , No. 22

- 7439, 2023 WL 3734977 (4th Cir. May 31, 2023) , and thus his current challenges are not properly before us
. Because, at bottom, th e relief sought by Hill is not available by way of mandamus , we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the USCA4 Appeal: 24-1757 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1757 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Issue 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, June 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Issue Committee will be held Thursday, June 11, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 
1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine 
Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the 
Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 22, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-9873 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS VALUATION EXPERT**

 

May 9, 2006

 

Witness Systems, Inc.

300 Colonial Center Parkway

Roswell, Georgia 30076

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name Taylor Consulting Group, Inc.and of references to Taylor Consulting Group, Inc. and to the inclusion ofand references to our reports, or information contained therein, dated  January 24, 2005, prepared for WitnessSystems, Inc. appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofWitness Systems, Inc.

 

 
| Sincerely,                         |
|------------------------------------|
| Taylor Consulting Group, Inc. |
|                               |
|                               |
| /s/ MICHAEL HALLIWELL              |   |
|                               |
| Michael Halliwell                  |
| Managing Director                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Syscan Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

      (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
      2006 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                              Date: May 15, 2006


                                              /S/ DARWIN HU
                                              -------------
                                              Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                              Chief Executive Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 188 (Thursday, September 28, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 50244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50928]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

21 CFR Parts 1301, 1303, 1304 and 1305

[DEA-108P]
RIN 1117-AA19


Definition and Registration of Disposers

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-20890 beginning on page 43732 in the 
issue of Wednesday, August 23, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 43732, in the third column, in the first line, 
``proposes'' should read ``proposed''. And in the same column, in the 
10th line from the bottom of the page, ``III'' should read ``II''.


Sec. 1301.26  [Corrected]

    2. On page 43733, in the third column, in Sec. 1301.26(a)(2), in 
the 7th line, ``posses'' should read ``possess''.


Sec. 1304.34  [Corrected]

    3. On page 43734, in the third column, in Sec. 1304.34(b), in the 
third line, ``medial'' should read ``media''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30317]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wendy Michelle GILBERT v. STATE

CR-15-0894

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 150 (Friday, August 2, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-40802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 960531152-6152-01; I.D. 042996B]
RIN 0648-Al18


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska

Correction

    In rule document 96-14593, beginning on page 31228, in the issue of 
Wednesday, June 19, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 31288, in the Figure 4 caption, ``a. Map'' should be 
centered beneath ``Figure 4 to Part 679--Herring Savings Areas in the 
BSAI''.
    2. On page 31297, in TABLE 3, on the FMP SPECIES line, the 
numbering sequence should begin with column 3, WHOLE FISH, instead of 
column 2, SPECIES CODE, and the subsequent columns should be renumbered 
sequentially.
    3. On page 31302, in TABLE 9, on the second line, in the third 
column, ``Cather-processor'' should read ``Catcher-processor''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.maryland.gov 

Larry Hogan 

Governor 

Boyd Rutherford 

Lieutenant Governor 

Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

~c1 ·a 9 281! 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

RECEIVED 

ocr 1 ~: 2015 

Ben Grumbles 

Secretary 

NOV 1 ? 2015 

Division Director (3AP\JU) 

On July 22, 2013, Maryland submitted the Baltimore Serious Nonattainment Area 8-Hour 0.08 ppm 

Ozone State Implementation Plan: Demonstrating Rate of Progress for 2008, 2011 and 2012; Revision 

to the 2002 Base Year Emissions; and Serious Area Attainment Demonstration. 

MDE would like to provide clarification that the 2012 attainment Mobile Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

(MVEBs) are the 2012 Reasonable Further ProgresS: (RFP) MVEBs. Below are the. tables and 

corresponding page numbers that show the 2012 attainment MVEBs are the 2012 RFP MVEBs. 

1. Table 4.7, "2012 Projected Controlled VOC and NOx Emission (tons/day) Baltimore 

Nonattainment Area," on page 39 of the 2013 submittal gives the 2012 projected controlled 

emi ion for attainment, by sector. The RFP for 2012 projected controlled emissions for 

attainment, by sector i also discussed in Section 7.0 of the 2013 submittal, starting on page 51 . 

2. The total2012 controlled emissions (to meet RFP) are listed on page 53. The total2012 

emissions on pages 39 and 53 are the same (i.e. RFP and attainment inventories are equal). 

3. Transportation conformity is discussed in Section 10, staring on page 91. The mobile budgets 

for 2012 are listed on page 93. The mobile budgets on page 91 are the same as the mobile 

source controlled emissions in table 4.7 on page 39. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at 410-537-3255. 

Sincerely, 

George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director 

Air and Radiation Management Administration 

~ Recycled Paper www.mde.maryland.gov TIY Users l-800-735·2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4777 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, Alabama 

as the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4777 RFS

1 SECTION 1. AMELIA BOYNTON ROBINSON POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, 

5 Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Amelia 

6 Boynton Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Rob11 inson Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 487 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 487

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To allow the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease or transfer certain 
                                 lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
without further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United 
States, the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma may lease, sell, convey, warrant, 
or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interests in any real 
property that is not held in trust by the United States for the benefit 
of such tribe.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section shall--
            (1) authorize the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease, sell, 
        convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of an 
        interest in any real property that is held in trust by the 
        United States for the benefit of such tribe; or
            (2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in such trust land.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 487

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To allow the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease or transfer certain 
                                 lands.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           New England Water Science Center—Bringing quality and reliable water science to New England      

      November 28, 2023    

View Report

HTML Format

XML Format

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) New England Water Science Center provides timely and reliable information to Federal, State, Tribal, and local stakeholders on the water resources of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. This information product broadly describes the center’s research priorities and monitoring network and how its work benefits the public and environment.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - United States
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Maine
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  Vermont
                  -  New England

View All **
Richardson Arthur Johnson KENNEDY v. STATE

CR-15-1331

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-66648) and Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-34238, 333-34240, 333-55096 and 333-82276) of Edison Schools Inc. of
our report dated September 5, 2002, except for Note 20, for which the date is
September 30, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
September 30, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 4184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40120]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: CASE NO.: 20-11252-BKC-PGH

Michael Scott Schaefer,

CHAPTER 7

 Debtor.

 /

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE MOTION TO ALLOW POST-PETITION 

CERTIFICATE OF BUDGET AND CREDIT COUNSELING COURSE (ECF 

NO. 14) FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

THIS CASE came before the Court for hearing on March 19, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. 

on the Debtor’s Ex Parte Motion to Allow Post-Petition Certificate of Budget and 

Credit Counseling (the “Motion”). Neither the Debtor nor Debtor’s counsel appeared 

at the hearing.

As a result, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice

for failure to prosecute. 

###

Paul G. Hyman, Jr.,Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 23, 2020.

Case 20-11252-PGH Doc 27 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Copies Furnished To:

Debtor

Debtor’s counsel

Trustee

AUST

Case 20-11252-PGH Doc 27 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit32.2**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# ** **

In connection with the Annual Report of LaBranche& Co Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Jeffrey M. Chertoff, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the bestof my knowledge, that:

 

1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of,and for, the period covered by the Report.

 
| ** ** | **Date: March 15, 2006**                          |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | **/s/ Jeffrey M. Chertoff**                       | ** ** |
| ** ** | **Name: Jeffrey M. Chertoff**                     |
| ** ** | **Title:  Senior  Vice President and Chief** |
| ** ** | **Financial Officer**                             |
|            |                                                   |  |  |  |  |

** **

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report oras a separate disclosure document. **A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toLaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
Jermaine WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed because of the appellant's failure to satisfy this court's April 5, 2018 fee order.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.