alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Seismicity of the Earth 1900-2010 eastern margin of the Australia plate      

      December 21, 2011    

The eastern margin of the Australia plate is one of the most seismically active areas of the world due to high rates of convergence between the Australia and Pacific plates. In the region of New Zealand, the 3,000 km long Australia-Pacific plate boundary extends from south of Macquarie Island to the southern Kermadec Island chain. It includes an oceanic transform (the Macquarie Ridge), two oppositely verging subduction zones (Puysegur and Hikurangi), and a transpressive continental transform, the Alpine Fault through South Island, New Zealand. Since 1900, there have been 15 M7.5+ earthquakes recorded near New Zealand. Nine of these, and the four largest, occurred along or near the Macquarie Ridge, including the 1989 M8.2 event on the ridge itself, and the 2004 M8.1 event 200 km to the west of the plate boundary, reflecting intraplate deformation. The largest recorded earthquake in New Zealand itself was the 1931 M7.8 Hawke's Bay earthquake, which killed 256 people. The last M7.5+ earthquake along the Alpine Fault was 170 years ago; studies of the faults' strain accumulation suggest that similar events are likely to occur again.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Gavin P Hayes

##### Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards

Natural Hazards Mission Area

ghayes@usgs.gov

303-273-8421

## Related Content

#### Gavin P Hayes

##### Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards

Natural Hazards Mission Area

ghayes@usgs.gov

303-273-8421

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - American Samoa;Fiji;New Caledonia;New Zealand;Samoa

View All **
Case 20-12738-RAM Doc 30 Filed 06/09/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-12738-RAM Doc 30 Filed 06/09/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-12738-RAM Doc 30 Filed 06/09/20 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT      21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF REGISTRANT**

|  **Name**                                           | **State                of****Incorporation/Organization** | **Collectors                Universe****Ownership                Percentage** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |                                                      |                                                                          |
| Professional                Coin Grading Services, Inc.  | Delaware                                                  | 100%                                                                          |
|                                                     |                                                      |                                                                          |
| Collectors                Finance Corporation            | California                                                | 100%                                                                          |
|                                                     |                                                      |                                                                          |
| Certified                Asset Exchange, Inc.            | Delaware                                                  | 100%                                                                          |
|                                                     |                                                      |                                                                          |
| Gem                Certification and Assurance Lab, Inc. | Delaware                                                  | 100%                                                                          |
Exhibit 23.2

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11 (a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it
becomes effective contains an untrue statement of material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring
a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

The
Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its independent auditors, effective May 20, 2002. For additional information, see the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated, May 20, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
registration statements (File Nos. 333-44464, 333-73212, 333-76928 and 333-102607) (the "Registration Statements") of Andersen's audit report with
respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the three years then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities
Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Andersen. As a
result, with respect to transactions in the Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11 (a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the
financial statements audited by Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11
(a) of the Securities Act.

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 53 (Monday, March 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20320]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Romerio L. WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Sediment characteristics of small streams in southern Wisconsin, 1954-59      

      January 1, 1963    

View Document

The results of investigations of the sediment and water discharge characteristics of Black Earth Creek, Mount Vernon Creek, and Yellowstone River from 1954 to 1959 and Dell Creek for 1958 and 1959 indicate large differences in annual runoff and sediment yields. The suspended-sediment discharge of Black Earth Creek averaged 3,260 tons per year or 71 tons per square mile : the annual yields ranged from 27 to 102 tons per square mile. The annual suspended-sediment yield of Mount Vernon Creek ranged from 48 to 171 tons per square mile and averaged 96 tons per square mile. The maximum daily discharge was 1,120 tons on April 1, 1960, during a storm which produced 67 percent of the suspended load for that water year and exceeded the discharge for the preceding 3 years. The sediment discharge of the Yellowstone River averaged 6,870 tons per year or 236 tons per square riffle. The maximum daily sediment discharge, 3,750 tons on April 1, 1959, occurred during a 14-day period of high flow during which the sediment discharge was 15,480 tons. In 1958 and 1959, Dell Creek had suspended-sediment yields of 4.7 and 26 tons per square mile of drainage area. The suspended sediment transported by Black Earth and Mount Vernon Creeks is about two-thirds clay and one-third silt. For Yellowstone River the particle-size distribution of the suspended sediment ranged from three-fourths clay and one-fourth silt during periods of low sediment discharge to one-third clay and two-thirds silt during high sediment discharges. For Dell Creek nearly all of the suspended sediment is clay, but the bed load is sand. The mean sediment concentration of storm runoff averaged two to three times more in the summer than in the winter. No significant changes with time occurred in the relation between storm runoff and sediment yield.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Black Earth Creek
                  -  Dell Creek
                  -  Mount Vernon Creek
                  -  Yellowstone River
                  - wisconsin

View All **
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 6 (iii)

                         GRANT OF OPTION AND AGREEMENT
                          TO PURCHASE CORPORATE STOCK


          OPTION GIVEN this 11th day of August, 1999, by Hydrogiene Corporation,
of San Diego, California ("grantor"), by the authority of the board of directors
of grantor corporation, in accordance with a resolution of the board adopted at
a board meeting on the 28/th/ day of March, 1999, to Charles W. Kallmann, of San
Diego, California ("grantee"):

     1.   Grantor hereby grants to grantee an option to purchase 3 million
          (3,000,000) shares of the common stock of grantor corporation. Such
          purchase shall be on the terms and conditions stated in this option
          agreement.

     2.   This option is effective immediately when executed by grantor, and
          will expire at 5:00 o'clock p.m. on December 31, in the year 2002.
          Notice of the option shall be provided grantee in writing.

     3.   Grantee may exercise this option only by delivering to grantor a
          written notice thereof, signed by grantee, and tendering the
          consideration there set forth, before the time set for expiration of
          the option. Any such notice, if sent by registered or certified mail,
          shall be considered delivered when deposited in the United States
          mail.

     4.   As consideration for the grant of this option, grantee has paid to
          grantor, concurrently with the execution hereof, the sum of $100, and
          other valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by
          grantor. This option is exercisable either partially or in full during
          the option period. Grantee may partially exercise the option as
          frequently and in such increments as grantee desires, cumulatively, up
          to the total number of optioned shares.

     5.   The terms of this option are as follows: Grantee may purchase the
          stated number of shares at the strike price calculated at fifteen
          percent (15%) of the bid price of the stock on the date the option is
          exercised.

     6.   In the event grantee fails to exercise this option, grantor shall
          retain all consideration paid as consideration for this option. If the
          option is exercised, the sum paid as consideration for this option
          shall be applied to the purchase price under the terms hereof.
<PAGE>

     7.   This option agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the
          benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, or
          assigns.

GRANTOR:  HYDROGIENE CORPORATION



By: /s/ Michael N. Brette                 Dated: 11 August 1999
                                                 --------------
        Michael N. Brette


Attested:


By: /s/ Karl R. Rolls, Jr.                Dated: 11 August 1999
                                                 --------------
        Karl R. Rolls, Jr., Secretary
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, David C. Nolan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Company). This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report).

By
execution of this statement, I certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A) | the Report fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | B) | the
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
  of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended
that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request

|                       |                                     
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------
|Date: March
  15, 2007 | /s/ David C.
  Nolan                
|                       |                                     
|                       | David C.
  Nolan                    
|                       | Executive
  Vice President and Chief
|                       | Financial
  Officer                 

---
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



(Section 302 Certification)



I, Thomas E. Vessey, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 1st Centennial Bancorp;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 10, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas E. Vessey                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

11699

Vol. 60, No. 41

Thursday, March 2, 1995

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50–029]

Yankee Atomic Electric Co.; Yankee

Nuclear Power Station; Order

Approving the Decommissioning Plan

and Authorizing Decommissioning of

Facility

Correction

In notice document 95–4268

beginning on page 9870 in the issue of

Wednesday, February 22, 1995, make

the following corrections:

1. On page 9870, in the third column,

in the second paragraph, in the third

line from the bottom, the word ‘‘plant’’

should read ‘‘plan’’.

2. On page 9871, in the second

column, in the first paragraph, in the

quoted paragraph, in the first line,

‘‘With the respect’’ should read ‘‘With

respect’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35334; File No. SR-NASD94-64]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order

Approving Proposed Rule Change by

National Association of Securities

Dealers, Inc. Relating to Numbering

and Terminology of Rules and

Correction of Cross References

Correction

In notice document 95–3496

appearing on page 8262 in the issue of

Monday, February 13, 1995 make the

following corrections:

On page 8262, in the first column, in

the heading, the File No. is corrected to

read as set forth above; and in the

second column, the signature line was

inadvertently omitted and should

appear as follows:

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35370; File No. SR-NASD95-05]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice

of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by

National Association of Securities

Dealers, Inc. Relating to Time Period

for the Exchange of Documents Before

an Arbitration Hearing

Correction

In notice document 95–4086

beginning on page 9708, in the issue of

Tuesday, February 21, 1995, in the third

column, the agency release number

should read as printed above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 10427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-110224]



                                                    VOL. 60, NO. 37

                                          Friday, February 24, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 37/Friday, February 24, 1995/
Corrections
[[Page 10427]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 51

[Docket Number FV-94-302]


Bermuda-Granex-Grano Type Onions and Onions (Other than Bermuda-
Granex-Grano and Creole Type); Grade Standards

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-3787 beginning on page 8973 in the 
issue of Thursday, February 16, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 51.3199  [Corrected]

    On page 8979, in the third column, in the table for Sec. 51.3199, 
underneath the heading ``Minimum diameter'' and at the bottom row of 
the subheading ``millimeters'', ``95.3 (<SUP>2)'' should read ``95.3'' 
and ``(<SUP>2)'' should appear one column over to the right, in the 
bottom row, underneath the subheading ``Inches''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Luz Elena VELASQUEZ, Appellant, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE F.S.B., Appellee.

No. 4D17-3055

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

SoCo Contracting, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62218-ADR, 62219-ADR

)

Under Contract No. FA4803-14-C-0003 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Harry Z. Rippeon, III, Esq.

Gesue A. Staltari, Esq.

 Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP

 Atlanta, GA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

 Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Lori R. Shapiro, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CATES-HARMAN

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment 

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent 

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $486,094.37, 

consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement. This amount is inclusive of Contract 

Disputes Act interest. No further interest shall be paid. 

Dated: November 15, 2021

STEPHANIE CATES-HARMAN

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)
2

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62218-ADR, 62219-ADR,

Appeals of SoCo Contracting, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: November 16, 2021

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals