alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4850 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt certain micro-offerings from 

the registration requirements of such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mr. EMMER of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. MESSER, Mr. BARR, Mr. ROYCE, 

Mr. CHABOT, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, and Mr. WILLIAMS) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt certain 

micro-offerings from the registration requirements of 

such Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Micro Offering Safe 

5 Harbor Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS FOR MICRO-OFFERINGS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4 of the Securities Act of 

8 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77d) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4850 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

2 following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(8) transactions meeting the requirements of 

4 subsection (e).’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(e) CERTAIN MICRO-OFFERINGS.—The transactions 

7 referred to in subsection (a)(8) are transactions involving 

8 the sale of securities by an issuer (including all entities 

9 controlled by or under common control with the issuer) 

10 that meet one or more of the following requirements: 

11 ‘‘(1) PRE-EXISTING RELATIONSHIP.—Each pur12 chaser has a substantive pre-existing relationship 

13 with an officer of the issuer, a director of the issuer, 

14 or a shareholder holding 10 percent or more of the 

15 shares of the issuer. 

16 ‘‘(2) 35 OR FEWER PURCHASERS.—There are 

17 no more than, or the issuer reasonably believes that 

18 there are no more than, 35 purchasers of securities 

19 from the issuer that are sold in reliance on the ex20 emption provided under subsection (a)(8) during the 

21 12-month period preceding such transaction. 

22 ‘‘(3) SMALL OFFERING AMOUNT.—The aggre23 gate amount of all securities sold by the issuer, in24 cluding any amount sold in reliance on the exemp25 tion provided under subsection (a)(8), during the 12- 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4850 IH

1 month period preceding such transaction, does not 

2 exceed $500,000.’’. 

3 (b) EXEMPTION UNDER STATE REGULATIONS.—Sec4 tion 18(b)(4) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 

5 77r(b)(4)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period 

9 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(H) section 4(a)(8).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Monoclinic tridymite in clast-rich impact melt rock from the Chesapeake Bay impact structure      

      January 1, 2011    

X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy confirm a rare terrestrial occurrence of monoclinic tridymite in clast-rich impact melt rock from the Eyreville B drill core in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. The monoclinic tridymite occurs with quartz paramorphs after tridymite and K-feldspar in a microcrystalline groundmass of devitrified glass and Fe-rich smectite. Electron-microprobe analyses revealed that the tridymite and quartz paramorphs after tridymite contain different amounts of chemical impurities. Inspection by SEM showed that the tridymite crystal surfaces are smooth, whereas the quartz paramorphs contain irregular tabular voids. These voids may represent microporosity formed by volume decrease in the presence of fluid during transformation from tridymite to quartz, or skeletal growth in the original tridymite. Cristobalite locally rims spherulites within the same drill core interval. The occurrences of tridymite and cristobalite appear to be restricted to the thickest clast-rich impact melt body in the core at 1402.02–1407.49 m depth. Their formation and preservation in an alkali-rich, high-silica melt rock suggest initially high temperatures followed by rapid cooling.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Harvey E. Belkin

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

hbelkin@usgs.gov

703-648-6162

## Related Content

#### Harvey E. Belkin

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

hbelkin@usgs.gov

703-648-6162

### Contact

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Michael Schaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of their knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael Schaffer                          /s/ Lawrence Schaffer
----------------------------------            ----------------------------------
By: Michael Schaffer                          By: Lawrence Schaffer
Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2007                             February 14, 2007
M.M., Mother of R.D., J.D. and K.D., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

35452

Vol. 60, No. 130

Friday, July 7, 1995

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 9, 60, 260, 262, 264, 265,

270, and 271

[IL-64-2-5807; FRL-5110-8]

RIN 2060-AB94

Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage

and Disposal Facilities and Hazardous

Waste Generators; Organic Air

Emission Standards for tanks, Surface

Impoundments, and Containers

Correction

In rule document 94–29693 beginning

on page 62896 in the issue of Tuesday,

December 6, 1994, make the following

correction:

On page 62912, in the second column,

in the second line, ‘‘CESA’’ should read

‘‘CE2A’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 94-NM-252-AD; Amendment 39-

9285; AD 95-13-05]

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing

Model 747 Series Airplanes Equipped

with Rolls Royce Model RB211 Series

Engines

Correction

In rule document 95–15298 beginning

on page 33333, in the issue of

Wednesday, June 28, 1995, make the

following correction:

§39.13 [Corrected]

On page 33336, in the first column, in

§39.13 (g), in the second line, ‘‘August

28, 1995.’’ should read ‘‘July 28, 1995.’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE:

CASE NO.: 19-25189-JKO

DEBORAH JOY BISE, Chapter 13

Debtor.

________________________/

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR:

THIS IS AN OBJECTION TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority status of 

the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify which claim 

is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. Upon the filing of this objection 

an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled on the date already scheduled for the 

confirmation hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1, the debtor objects to the following claim filed 

in this case:

Claim 

No.

Name of Claimant Amount of 

Claim

Basis for Objection and 

Recommended Disposition

6 Internal Revenue Service

PO Box 7346

Philadelphia, PA 19101-7346

$28,314.05 Basis for Objection: Debtor objects to 

this claim as she had no taxable or 

negligible income in 2015, 2016, 2017 

and 2018. 

Recommended Disposition: The claim 

should be stricken in its entirety.

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this objection will be 

served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the confirmation hearing dated and that a 

certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the court when the objection 

and the notice of hearing are served.

Date: February 6, 2020. FLORIDA DEBT RELIEF CENTER, LLC

Attorneys for the Debtor

2385 NW Executive Center Drive, Suite 100

Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Telephone: (954) 535-9905

Facsimile: (954) 337-8500 fax

jeff@itsjustdebt.com

By:_/s/ Jeffrey H. Tromberg, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No.: 882542

Case 19-25189-PGH Doc 31 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 235 (Thursday, December 5, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 64569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11205]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 235 / Thursday, December 5, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 64569]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Part 223

RIN 0596-AB41


Sale and Disposal of National Forest Timber; Indices To Determine 
Market-Related Contract Term Additions

Correction

    In the issue of Wednesday, November 13, 1996, on page 58281, in the 
first column, in the last line, in the correction of proposed rule 
document 96-26755, ``January 21, 1977'' should read ``January 21, 
1997''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 2 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 2 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 2 Filed 09/10/20 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 10150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-130223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Social Security Administration

20 CFR Parts 404 and 416

[Regulations Nos. 4 and 16]
RIN 0960-AD96


Federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance and 
Supplemental Security Income for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled; Benefit 
Reforms for Individuals Disabled Based on Drug Addiction or Alcoholism

Correction

    In rule document 95-3369 beginning on page 8140 in the issue of 
Friday, February 10, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 404.315  [Corrected]

    1. On page 8145, in the first column, in amendatory instruction 2., 
in the second line, ``test'' should read ``text''.


PART 416  [CORRECTED]

    2. On page 8149, in the third column, in the authority citation, in 
the first line, after ``1611(c)'' remove the comma.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4781 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to make certain functions 

of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation subject to appropriations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, and Mr. RATCLIFFE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to make certain 

functions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

subject to appropriations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FDIC Accountability 

5 Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR CERTAIN 

7 FDIC FUNCTIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10 of the Federal Deposit 

9 Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1820) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4781 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(a) The’’ and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(a) POWERS.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The’’; 

5 (B) by inserting ‘‘, subject to paragraph 

6 (2) and subsection (l),’’ after ‘‘The Board of 

7 Directors of the Corporation’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) APPROPRIATIONS REQUIREMENT.—The 

11 Corporation may only incur obligation or allow and 

12 pay expenses pursuant to an appropriations Act, 

13 other than with respect to obligations or expenses 

14 paid for with funds from the Deposit Insurance 

15 Fund or incurred, allowed, or paid for the purpose 

16 of carrying out the insurance function of the Cor17 poration.’’; and 

18 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub19 section: 

20 ‘‘(l) NON-INSURANCE FEES AS OFFSETTING COL21 LECTIONS.—Any fees collected by the Corporation, except 

22 pursuant to section 5(d), shall be deposited and credited 

23 as offsetting collections to the account providing appro24 priations to the Corporation.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4781 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to expenses paid and 

3 fees collected on or after the date that is 90 days after 

4 the date of the enactment of the first appropriation Act 

5 that provides for appropriations to the Federal Deposit 

6 Insurance Corporation and that is enacted after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[LETTERHEAD OF BK ASSOCIATES, INC.]






                                 March 22, 2000


Aircraft Finance Trust
c/o Wilmington Trust Company
1100 North Market Street
Rodney Square North
Wilmington, Delaware 19890

Re: Aircraft Finance Trust, Series 1999-1


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (file
no.  333-82153) of Aircraft  Finance Trust,  to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We  hereby  consent  to  (i)  the  use  of  the  information  contained  in  our
appraisal(s)  for the dates set forth in the Form 10-K,  (ii) the  references to
our firm in such Form 10-K,  (iii) the filing of our appraisals as an exhibit to
the Form 10-K and (iv) the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.

                                         BK ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                         /s/  R. L. Britton
                                         -------------------------

                                         R. L. Britton
                                         Vice President
                                         ISTAT Certified Appraiser
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          $439,763
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     49,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      334,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 864,218
<PP&E>                                           113,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (24,847)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,286,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            714,441
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          221
<COMMON>                                           4,785
<OTHER-SE>                                       462,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,286,806
<SALES>                                          699,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 699,021
<CGS>                                            256,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    759,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (292,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (292,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (292,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 10, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 47786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AD41


Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposal for Approval of Bismuth-Tin Shot 
as a Nontoxic

Correction

    The correction to proposed rule document 96-20726 in the issue of 
Tuesday, August 27, 1996, is corrected as follows:
    On page 44119, in the second column, in the fourth line, 
``effective date'' should read ``comment date''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 20-17050-AJC Doc 62 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-17050-AJC Doc 62 Filed 12/08/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-17050-AJC Doc 62 Filed 12/08/20 Page 3 of 3
# United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 July 1, 2005
Before HON. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge HON. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge HON. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 02-4146 United States of America, Appeal from the United States

Plaintiff-Appellee
, District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
v. No. 01 CR 140 Michael Imperl,

Defendant-Appellant. Lynn Adelman, Judge.


### O R D E R
After concluding that the district court had correctly calculated the applicable range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, we ordered a limited remand so that the district court could determine whether Michael Imperl’s sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), has relegated the United States Sentencing Guidelines to advisory status. See United States v. Paladino

, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). The district court judge has replied that he would impose the same sentence today knowing that the Guidelines are not mandatory. Therefore, “we will affirm the original sentence against [Imperl’s] plain error challenge provided the sentence is reasonable, the standard of review prescribed by Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 765.” Paladino

, 401 F.3d at 484. On June 13, 2005, we invited the parties to file, within seven days, any arguments concerning the appropriate disposition of the appeal in light of the district court’s decision. We have received each party’s submission. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53No. 02-4146 Page 2

Imperl contends again that his sentence was improper under Booker because the findings of fact upon which sentences are imposed must be found by juries, not judges, and that his sentence was reimposed largely based upon judge-found facts. He asks that we vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing. Imperl’s argument has no merit. Booker recognized that the Sixth Amendment is violated when a sentencing judge imposes an enhanced sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on a sentencing judge’s determination of a fact (other than a fact of prior conviction) neither found by a jury nor admitted by the defendant. See Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 756. The remedy for such a violation lies not in a new trial or a resentencing based on only jury-found or defendant-admitted facts, however. Rather, the Supreme Court held that excision of two provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § § 3553(b)(1) and 3742(e), thereby making the Guidelines advisory, constituted the proper remedy. Id. at 756-57. The Guidelines sentencing range applicable here is 46 to 57 months. Imperl’s 46 month sentence lies at the low end of this range. On remand, the district court judge provided a thorough, nine-page memorandum detailing why he believed a 46 month sentence was still appropriate even with the knowledge that the Guidelines are only advisory. We have considered the defendant’s circumstances and the district court’s reasoning, and we do not believe the 46 month sentence should be deemed “unreasonable.” Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is A FFIRMED

.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50110]







-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service
[INS No. 1615E-94]
RIN 1115-AC30


Expiration of Deferred Enforced Departure for Nationals of El 
Salvador

Correction

    In notice document 94-30088 beginning on page 62751, in the issue 
of Tuesday, December 6, 1994, make the following correction:
    On page 62752, in the second column, in the fourth line, after 
``asylum'' insert ``application until the date of the decision by the 
asylum''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-18-00524-CR & 04-18-00525-CR

Braulio TIRADO-MORALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 6200 & 6201

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments are 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 20, 2019.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      the Quarterly Report of Vista International Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2008





By:
            */s/
                Timothy A. Peach*Timothy
                A. Peach
              Chief
                Financial Officer