alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Soils and late-Quaternary landscape evolution in the Cottonwood River basin, east-central Kansas: Implications for archaeological research      

      January 1, 2011    

Temporal and spatial patterns of landscape evolution strongly influence the temporal and spatial patterns of the archaeological record in drainage systems. In this geoarchaeological investigation we took a basin‐wide approach in assessing the soil stratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, and geochronology of alluvial deposits and associated buried soils in the Cottonwood River basin of east‐central Kansas. Patterns of landscape evolution emerge when stratigraphic sequences and radiocarbon chronologies are compared by stream size and landform type. In the valleys of high‐order streams (≥4th order) the Younger Dryas Chronozone (ca. 11,000–10,000 14C yr B.P.) was characterized by slow aggradation accompanied by pedogenesis, resulting in the development of organic‐rich cumulic soils. Between ca. 10,000 and 4900 14C yr B.P., aggradation punctuated by soil formation was the dominant process in those valleys. Alluvial fans formed on the margins of high‐order stream valleys during the early and middle Holocene (ca. 9000–5000 14C yr B.P.) and continued to develop slowly until ca. 3000–2000 14C yr B.P. The late‐Holocene record of high‐order streams is characterized by episodes of entrenchment, rapid aggradation, and slow aggradation punctuated by soil development. By contrast, the early and middle Holocene (ca. 10,000–5000 14C yr B.P.) was a period of net erosion in the valleys of low‐order streams. However, during the late Holocene small valleys became zones of net sediment storage. Consideration of the effects of these patterns of landscape evolution on the archaeological record is crucial for accurately interpreting that record and searching for buried archaeological deposits dating to specific cultural periods. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - kansas

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Submarine permafrost map in the arctic modelled using 1D transient heat flux (SuPerMAP)      

      April 17, 2019    

Offshore permafrost plays a role in the global climate system, but observations of permafrost thickness, state, and composition are limited to specific regions. The current global permafrost map shows potential offshore permafrost distribution based on bathymetry and global sea level rise. As a first‐order estimate, we employ a heat transfer model to calculate the subsurface temperature field. Our model uses dynamic upper boundary conditions that synthesize Earth System Model air temperature, ice mass distribution and thickness, and global sea level reconstruction and applies globally distributed geothermal heat flux as a lower boundary condition. Sea level reconstruction accounts for differences between marine and terrestrial sedimentation history. Sediment composition and pore water salinity are integrated in the model. Model runs for 450 ka for cross‐shelf transects were used to initialize the model for circumarctic modeling for the past 50 ka. Preindustrial submarine permafrost (i.e., cryotic sediment), modeled at 12.5‐km spatial resolution, lies beneath almost 2.5 ×106km2 of the Arctic shelf. Our simple modeling approach results in estimates of distribution of cryotic sediment that are similar to the current global map and recent seismically delineated permafrost distributions for the Beaufort and Kara seas, suggesting that sea level is a first‐order determinant for submarine permafrost distribution. Ice content and sediment thermal conductivity are also important for determining rates of permafrost thickness change. The model provides a consistent circumarctic approach to map submarine permafrost and to estimate the dynamics of permafrost in the past.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Carolyn Ruppel, PhD

##### Chief, USGS Gas Hydrates Project

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program

Energy Resources Program

cruppel@usgs.gov

508-457-2339

## Related Content

#### Carolyn Ruppel, PhD

##### Chief, USGS Gas Hydrates Project

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program

Energy Resources Program

cruppel@usgs.gov

508-457-2339

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Information Systems
                  - Methods and Analyses
                  - Science Technology
                  - Arctic shelf Regions

View All **
#### Walter Kracker, Appellant, *v.*Myrtle Motors Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 5, 1973.

*624
      *Weingrad & Weingrad (Samuel B. Weingrad*of counsel), for appellant. *O’Leary d O’Leary (Robert Devine*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs. No opinion.

Concur — Groat, P. J., Schwartzwald and Rinaldi, JJ.
Courtney Lamar DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**WRITTEN      STATEMENT**

**PURSUANT      TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 **

| (1)    |   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b)                  or                  15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report                fairly                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results                of                operations of the Company. |

|                                                      |                                                |                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                      |                                                |
|                                                 |                                           |                             |
| Date: June                24, 2005    | By:                                       | /s/ *Li                Xia WANG* |
|                                                      | Name:                Li Xia WANG                    |
|                                                      | Title:                 Chief Executive Officer |
Yolanda Yassazoe EMMANUEL, Appellant, v. LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-767

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135148 & Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver (15) Marilyn Kelly (16) Maura D. Corrigan (17) Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, 

INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 135148 
 v COA: 276935 
 Wayne CC: 06-625108-AV 

DONALD L. BRAMLAGE, JR., and 

DONNA BRAMLAGE, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for stay and for peremptory reversal are 

DENIED. 

l1106 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 9, 2007 

 Clerk
[LETTERHEAD OF AIRCRAFT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.]






March 22, 2000


Aircraft Finance Trust
c/o Wilmington Trust Company
1100 North Market Street
Rodney Square North
Wilmington, Delaware 19890

Re: Aircraft Finance Trust, Series 1999-1


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (file
no.  333-82153) of Aircraft  Finance Trust,  to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We  hereby  consent  to  (i)  the  use  of  the  information  contained  in  our
appraisal(s)  for the dates set forth in the Form 10-K,  (ii) the  references to
our firm in such Form 10-K,  (iii) the filing of our appraisals as an exhibit to
the Form 10-K and (iv) the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.

                                    Aircraft  Information Services, Inc.




                                    By:      /s/  John D. McNicol
                                             ---------------------------

                                             Name:  John D. McNicol
                                             Title: Vice President
                                                    Appraisals & Forecasts
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 6412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20220]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5411-8]


Technical Correction; Final National Pollutant Discharge 
Elimination System Storm Water Multi-Sector General Permit for 
Industrial Activities

Correction

    In notice document 95-2722, beginning on page 5248 in the issue of 
Friday, February 9, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 5252, in the third column, lines 1 through 22 at the top of 
the page should be moved directly above the line that reads ``5. 
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10523]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7451

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID ANTIONNE SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-91-443, CA-97-840-AM)

Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Antionne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reinke, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-91-7451; CA-97-840-AM (E.D.

Va. Sept. 17, 1997). We deny Smith’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## TSCA Section 5(e) Consent Order and

Determinations Supporting Consent Order

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-95-1098
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE SIX
MONTHS  ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 INCOME  STATEMENT,  AND THE APRIL 30, 2000  BALANCE
SHEET.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,953,272
<SECURITIES>                                   473,326
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,025
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,195,526
<PP&E>                                         450,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,904,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,129,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       202,863
<OTHER-SE>                                     373,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,904,879
<SALES>                                      3,926,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,926,925
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,763,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                273,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                   110,170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,568
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                             Ending
Class        Interest        Principal     Losses           Balance
<S>             <C>              <C>         <C>              <C>
A1         4543620.15      39296931.96          0       804719198.85
A2         4697549.99                0          0          858000000
A3         7514721.89                0          0         1370466000
AR               1.02              100          0                  0
B1          136214.88                0          0           24450000
B2           90821.05                0          0           16302000
B3           90821.05                0          0           16302000
B4           90821.05                0          0           16302000
B5           45393.81                0          0            8148000
B6            45387.4                0          0         8146849.74
X           361396.53                0          0                  0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 165 (Friday, August 23, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-37271; File No. 10-100]


Exempted Exchanges; AZX, Inc.; Order Amending Exemption Order and 
Granting Amendment to Application for Exemption From Registration as an 
Exchange Under Section 5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Final 
Order

Correction

    In notice document 96-14399 beginning on page 29145 in the issue of 
Friday, June 7, 1996 the docket number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Long-term declines in nest success of prairie ducks      

      January 1, 1996    

Increased predation on nests of ducks in prairie uplands, as a result of habitat alteration, has been hypothesized to cause decreased nest success and population sizes. We tested whether, and by how much, nest success declined using data compiled from 37 studies conducted between 1935 and 1992 at 67 sites in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada and the United States. Nest success declined (P = 0.0002) over time, but time explained only 10% of the variation; precipitation (P = 0.79) did not account for additional variation in nest success. Nest success declined at similar (P = 0.13) rates among 5 species, but late nesters (gadwall [Anas strepera], blue-winged teal [A. discors] and northern shoveler [A. clypeata]) had higher success (P = 0.004) than early nesters (mallard [A. platyrhynchos] and northern pintail [A. acuta]). Populations of gadwalls and northern shovelers, however, have not declined, indicating that declines in nest success may not be related causally to population change. Long-term population declines in blue-winged teal, northern pintails, and mallards coincide with large-scale temporal declines in nest success. Declines in nest success were parallel in parkland and grassland regions, suggesting a causal agent (or agents) that act(s) at a broad scale, despite inherent differences in the composition of the predator communities and habitats between regions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Douglas Johnson

##### Research Statistician Emeritus

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

douglas_h_johnson@usgs.gov

612-624-4716

## Related Content

#### Douglas Johnson

##### Research Statistician Emeritus

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

douglas_h_johnson@usgs.gov

612-624-4716

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 115 (Thursday, June 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 31500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40615]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**TIPPINGPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

 

I, Kip McClanahan, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls. 

 

Date: June 1, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

RON VIGDOR CASE NO. 20-12751-MAM

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

_______________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the Order Granting Motion for Relief from the 

Automatic Stay (Doc. No. 38) was served via CM/ECF notice and first-class mail to the below this 

8th day of July 2020. 

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Creditor

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Ron Vigdor

3900 NE 6th Drive

Boca Raton, FL 33431

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE 

Christian J. Olson, Esq. 

8551 Sunrise Blvd. Suite 208

Plantation, FL 33322

Robin R. Weiner 

POB 559007 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355 

U.S. Trustee

Office of the US Trustee 

51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

Suite 1204 

Miami, FL 33130

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 39 Filed 07/08/20 Page 1 of 1