alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of **Big Cat Energy Corporation** (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end of **April 30, 2006** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Goodale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2006.

 
ROBERT GOODALE 
Robert Goodale 
Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN JEROME HILLS, AKA Jerome Johnathan Hill, AKA Jerome Johnson Hill, AKA Janathan J. Hills, AKA Jerome Hills, AKA Jerome J. Hills, AKA Jerome Johnathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonathan Hills, AKA Jerome Jonthan Hills, AKA Johanathon Jerome Hills, AKA
Johna tham J. Hills, AKA Johnathan Jerome Hills, AKA Johnathon Jerome Hills, AKA Jonatham Jerome Hills, AKA Jonathan Hills, AKA Jonathon Jerome Hills, AKA Jonthan Jerome Hills, AKA Romeo Hills, AKA Robert Ricks, AKA Rome, AKA Romeo,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 50327

D.C. No. 2:05

- cr

- 01040

- JFW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 1 9 , 2022 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 50327

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jonathan Jerome Hill s appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

, and we affirm

.

Hill s contends that the district court erred by relying on its evaluation of the

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor s from the original sentencing hearing

. We disagree.

Though the court referenced its § 3553(a) analysis from th at earlier hearing

, the

record reflects that the court considered and applied the factors anew to reasonably

conclude that release was unwarranted in light of Hills’s significant criminal

history and the Bureau of Prisons ’s ability to manag e Hills’s health conditions

.

Moreov er, contrary to Hills’s contentions, the record reflects that the district court

considered Hills’s arguments , including those regarding post

- sentenc ing

rehabilitation, and adequately explained its decision to deny his motion

. S ee

Chavez

- Meza v. United St ates , 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1965 (2018)

. The court did not

abuse its discretion. See United States v. Aruda , 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021)

.

A ppellee’s motion to supplement the record is denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, the Chief Financial Officer, of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "registrant"), certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of the registrant;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



Dated
this 14th day of August 2003.

| |  | /s/WILLIAM F. EVANSWilliam F. Evans
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 21**- SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT     1. **Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc.**   (Wireline segment doing busines as   Puerto Rico Telephone)        (Wireless segment doing business as   Verizon Wireless)        Physical address: 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 Mailing address: P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998 State/jurisdiction of Incorporation: Puerto Rico     2. **Coqui.net Corporation**   (Doing business as Coqui.net)        Physical address: 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 Mailing address: P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998 State/jurisdiction of Incorporation: Puerto Rico     3. **PRT Larga Distancia, Inc.**   (Doing business as PRT Larga Distancia)        Physical address: 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 Mailing address: P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998 State/jurisdiction of Incorporation: Puerto Rico
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Nathaniel Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 21, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    | */s/ George A. Cretecos* | * * |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|----------|
|   |   | George  A. Cretecos      |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3648 

To exclude from gross income for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 any payments made from the Aurora Victim Relief Fund to 

the victims of the tragic event at the Century 16 Cinema in Aurora, 

Colorado, on July 20, 2012. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2012 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To exclude from gross income for purposes of the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 any payments made from the 

Aurora Victim Relief Fund to the victims of the tragic 

event at the Century 16 Cinema in Aurora, Colorado, 

on July 20, 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF PAY4 MENTS FROM THE AURORA VICTIM RELIEF 

5 FUND. 

6 For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 

7 gross income shall not include any amount received from 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3648 IS

1 the Aurora Victim Relief Fund established by the Commu2 nity First Foundation, an organization organized and op3 erated as described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986, if such amount is paid on account 

5 of the event on July 20, 2012. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
##### 



Exhibit 3.2
 
 
 Principal Office
 Registered Office
 
 Annual Meeting
 Special Meetings
 Place of Meetings
 Notice of Meeting
 1




---



##### 



Meeting of all Shareholders
 Fixing of Record Date
 Voting Record
  Quorum
 2




---



##### 



Manner of Acting
 Proxies
 Voting of Shares
 Voting of Shares by Certain Shareholders
     3




---



##### 



Informal Action by Shareholders
 Voting by Ballot
 No Cumulative Voting
 
 General Powers
 Number, Tenure and Qualifications
 4




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice
  Quorum
 Manner of Acting
 Action by Directors Without a Meeting
 5




---



##### 



Participation by Electronic Means
 Vacancies
 Resignation
 Removal
 Committees
 Compensation
 Presumption of Assent
 6




---



##### 



Number
 Election and Term of Office
 Removal
 Vacancies
 Chairman of the Board
 President
 7




---



##### 



The Vice Presidents
 The Secretary
 The Treasurer
 Assistant Secretaries and Assistant Treasurers
 8




---



##### 



Bonds
 Salaries
 
 Contracts
 Loans
 . Checks, Drafts, Etc.
 Deposits
 
 Regulations
 Certificates for Shares
 Cancellation of Certificates
 9




---



##### 



Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates
 Transfer of Shares
 Shares Held for the Account of a Specified Person or Persons
       10




---



##### 



Appointment
 11




---



##### 



Authority
 Tenure and Qualifications
 Meetings
 Quorum
 Action by Executive Committee Without a Meeting
 Vacancies
 Resignations and Removal
 12




---



##### 



Procedure
 
         13
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4765 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4765

  To provide first responders with planning, training, and equipment 
 capabilities for crude oil-by-rail and ethanol-by-rail derailment and 
               incident response, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

 Ms. Herrera Beutler introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide first responders with planning, training, and equipment 
 capabilities for crude oil-by-rail and ethanol-by-rail derailment and 
               incident response, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fire Department Proper Response and 
Equipment Prioritization Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR FIREFIGHTERS FOR CRUDE OIL-BY-RAIL AND ETHANOL-BY-
              RAIL DERAILMENT AND INCIDENT RESPONSE.

    Section 33(c) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 
1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(4) Priority.--The Administrator of FEMA shall, in 
        carrying out this section, give high priority consideration to 
        grants providing for planning, training, and equipment to 
        firefighters for crude oil-by-rail and ethanol-by-rail 
        derailment and incident response.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

Carlos A Rey Ruz Case No. 20-16654-PGH

 

 Debtor(s). Chapter 7

_________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Motion for Contempt, 

Compel, and for Sanctions Against Great Lakes Credit Union and Notice of Hearing was 

sent to all parties on the attached service list on July 10, 2020.

Electronically: Sonya Salkin, Trustee, 

First Class Mail: 

Debtor(s), Carlos A Rey Ruz 

6201 N Falls Circle Drive #413

Lauderhill, FL 33319-6857

CERTIFIED MAIL: 

Great Lakes Credit Union

Attn: Steve Bugg, President & CEO

PO Box 1289

Bannockburn IL 60015-0000

Great Lakes Credit Union

Attn: Steve Bugg, President & CEO

2111 Waukegan Road 

Bannockburn, IL 60015

Respectfully Submitted: 

ROBERT SANCHEZ, P.A. 

Attorney for Debtor

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Tel. 305-687-8008

By:/s/ Robert Sanchez_____________

 Robert Sanchez, Esq., FBN#0442161

Case 20-16654-PGH Doc 12 Filed 07/11/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 204 (Monday, October 23, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-41023]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 97

[PR Docket No. 93-305; FCC 95-402]


Implementation of a Vanity Call Sign System

Correction

    In rule document 95-25201 beginning on page 53132 in the issue of 
Thursday, October 12, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 53133, in the first column, in amendatory instruction 
number 4 to Sec. 97.21, ``(a)(3) and (ii)'' should read ``(a)(3)(ii)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Postimpact deposition in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure: Variations in eustasy, compaction, sediment supply, and passive-aggressive tectonism      

      January 1, 2009    

The Eyreville and Exmore, Virginia, core holes were drilled in the inner basin and annular trough, respectively, of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, and they allow us to evaluate sequence deposition in an impact crater. We provide new high-resolution geochronologic (<1 Ma) and sequence-stratigraphic interpretations of the Exmore core, identify 12 definite (and four possible) postimpact depositional sequences, and present comparisons with similar results from Eyreville and other mid- Atlantic core holes. The concurrence of increases in ??18O with Chesapeake Bay impact structure sequence boundaries indicates a primary glacioeustatic control on deposition. However, regional comparisons show the differential preservation of sequences across the mid-Atlantic margin. We explain this distribution by the compaction of impactites, regional sediment-supply changes, and the differential movement of basement structures. Upper Eocene strata are thin or missing updip and around the crater, but they thicken into the inner basin (and offshore to the southeast) due to rapid crater infilling and concurrent impactite compaction. Oligocene sequences are generally thin and highly dissected throughout the mid-Atlantic region due to sediment starvation and tectonism, except in southeastern New Jersey. Regional tectonic uplift of the Norfolk Arch coupled with a southward decrease in sediment supply resulted in: (1) largely absent Lower Miocene sections around the Chesapeake Bay impact structure compared to thick sections in New Jersey and Delaware; (2) thick Middle Miocene sequences across the Delmarva Peninsula that thin south of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure; and (3) upper Middle Miocene sections that pinch out just north of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Conversely, the Upper Miocene-Pliocene section is thick across Virginia, but it is poorly represented in New Jersey because of regional variations in relative subsidence.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

## Related Content

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

####               Florence Bascom Geoscience Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

703-648-5953

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Chesapeake Bay

View All **
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.: 20-19836-AJC

Chapter 13

Marco T Barrios

Maria Barrios

 Debtor(s) /

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION 

TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority status 

of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify which 

claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. Upon the filing of this 

objection an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled on the date already scheduled 

for the confirmation hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the [debtor] objects to 

the following claim filed in this case:

Claim Amount of

No. Name of Claimant Claim 

16 Internal Revenue Service $5,099.44

Basis for Objection and Recommended Disposition

On or about October 13, 2020, Creditor filed a proof of claim in the amount of $5,099.44 with 

$4,785.68 as a priority portion of the claim for an estimated tax claim for the year 2019. The 

Debtors filed their 2019 tax return and calculated that they do not have any tax liability. The 

Debtors request that the Creditor remove its priority portion of the claim as there was no tax 

liability per the Debtor’s 2019 income tax return and reduce the claim to the general unsecured 

portion of the claim in the amount of $313.76. In the alternative, the Debtors seek to strike the 

priority portion of the claim and allow the general unsecured portion as stated above. 

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this objection will 

be served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the confirmation hearing date and 

that a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the court when 

the objection and notice of hearing are served.

DATED: November 3, 2020 Respectfully Submitted: 

Robert Sanchez, P.A.

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Fl. Bar No. 0442161

Telephone: (305) 687-8008

E-Mail: court@bankruptcyclinic.com

Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 29 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1 of 1
A 0 0

12 Oil! 

TRUFUND FINANCIAL SERVICES, NO. 2024 CW 0132

INC. 

VERSUS

CITY OF BATON ROUGE/ PARISH

OF EAST BATON ROUGE

MAY 10, 2024

In Re: City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 645210. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

STAY DENIED; WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The district court' s

December 15, 2023 judgment granting the motion for partial

summary judgment filed by Defendant -in -Reconvention, TruFund

Financial Services, Inc., is a final, appealable judgment

pursuant to La. Code Civ. P. art. 1915 (A) ( 3) . See Jalou II, 

Inc. v. Liner, 2010- 0048 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 16/ 10), 43 So. 3d

1023, 1031 n. 5. Therefore, the writ is granted for the limited

purpose of remanding the case to the district court with

instructions to grant relator, City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of

East Baton Rouge, an appeal pursuant to the pleading that

notified the district court of its intention to seek writs. See

In re Howard, 541 So. 2d 195, 197 ( La. 1989) ( per curiam). A copy

of this Court' s order is to be included in the appellate record. 

Miller, J., agrees in part and dissents in part. I agree

with the majority' s decision to deny relator' s

stay request. 

However, I would deny the writ application. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              16
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    16
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               56
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          26
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,267
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    60
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (29)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (29)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>