alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Relation between the relative abundance and collapse of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and microbial antagonism in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon      

      March 26, 2024    

Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (AFA) is the dominant filamentous cyanobacterium that develops into blooms in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon each year. During AFA bloom and collapse, ecosystem conditions for endangered Lost River and shortnose suckers deteriorate, thus motivating the need to identify processes that limit AFA abundance and decline. Here we investigate the relations between AFA and other members of the microbial community (photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic bacteria and archaea), how those relations impact abundance and collapse of AFA, and the types of microbial conditions that suppress AFA. We found significant spatial variation in AFA relative abundance during the 2016 bloom period using 16S rRNA sequencing. The Pelican Marina (PM) site had the lowest AFA relative abundance, and this was coincident with increased relative abundance of Candidatus Sericytochromatia, Flavobacterium, and Rheinheimera, some of which are known AFA antagonists. The AFA collapse coincided with phosphorus limitation relative to nitrogen and the increased relative abundance of Cyanobium and Candidatus Sericytochromatia, which outcompete AFA when dissolved inorganic nitrogen is available. The data collected in this study indicate the importance of dissolved inorganic nitrogen combined with microbial community structure in suppressing AFA abundance.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jennifer Underwood

##### Microbiologist

Water Resources Mission Area

jcunder@usgs.gov

303-541-3033

#### Natalie C Hall, PhD

##### Supervisory Geographer

Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Water Science Center

nhall@usgs.gov

#### Adam C Mumford

##### Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

amumford@usgs.gov

703-648-5893

#### Ronald W Harvey

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

rwharvey@usgs.gov

303-541-3034

## Related Content

#### Jennifer Underwood

##### Microbiologist

Water Resources Mission Area

jcunder@usgs.gov

303-541-3033

#### Natalie C Hall, PhD

##### Supervisory Geographer

Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Water Science Center

nhall@usgs.gov

#### Adam C Mumford

##### Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

amumford@usgs.gov

703-648-5893

#### Ronald W Harvey

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

rwharvey@usgs.gov

303-541-3034

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon
                  - upper klamath lake

View All **
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Freestone Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clayton Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, James Carroll, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Clayton CarterClayton Carter

Chief Executive Officer

October 1, 2010





/s/ James CarrollJames Carroll

Chief Financial Officer

October 1, 2010
Yoel PADRON-GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20112]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel
Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Dated:
      May 13, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/
      Samuel ShengSamuel
      ShengChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial and accounting officer)
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 7, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20807]

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 7, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 41208]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 56-96]

Foreign-Trade Zone 181--Akron-Canton, Ohio Area; Applications for 
Expansion

Correction

    In the correction to notice document 96-18257, appearing on page 
39695, in the issue of Tuesday, July 30, 1996, the entry should read as 
set forth below:
    On page 37443, in the first column, in the fourth full paragraph, 
in the seventh line, ``[60 days from publication]'' should read 
``September 16, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 18  -  PREFERABILITY LETTER:  ACCOUNTING CHANGE



March 9, 2001

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc.
1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Telecomunicaciones de
Puerto Rico, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, included in your
Annual report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have
issued our report thereon dated March 9, 2001, which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning a change in the method
of accounting for directory-publishing revenues and related expenses from the
amortization method, under which revenues and expenses were recognized over the
lives of the directories (generally one year) to the point of publication
method, under which directory-publishing revenues and related expenses are
recognized on the date that directories are published and substantially
delivered. Note 3 to such consolidated financial statements contains a
description of your adoption during the year ended December 31, 2000 of the
point of publication method of accounting for directory-publishing revenues and
related expenses. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting
principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,


Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Juan, Puerto Rico


                                       76
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Probability weighted moments: Definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressable in inverse form      

      January 1, 1979    

Distributions whose inverse forms are explicitly defined, such as Tukey's lambda, may present problems in deriving their parameters by more conventional means. Probability weighted moments are introduced and shown to be potentially useful in expressing the parameters of these distributions.

## Citation Information
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO MARTINEZ-CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas EP-94-CA-187-H

May 7, 1996 Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: After considering the briefs and record, the Court concludes that the district court correctly denied relief under 28 U.S.C. §
2255. We are in essential agreement with the district court’s reasoning. It is clear that the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is not met on the undisputed facts here. There was no need for an evidentiary hearing.2 AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Sysview Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A-2 for the quarter ended March
         31, 2005 (the "Form 10-QSB/A-2") of the Company fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A-2 fairly presents,
         in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                              Date: August 16, 2006
                              /S/ WILLIAM HAWKINS
                              -------------------
                              William Hawkins, Acting Chief Financial Officer,
                              Chief Operating Officer and Secretary

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAY R. SINGER , Appellant,

v.

NOREEN SINGER and SALLY CHAZAN , Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 1011

[ September 15, 2021 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; G. Joseph Curley , Judge; L.T. Case
No. 50

- 2018

- CA

- 004117

- XXXX

- MB

.
Jay Russell Singer, Lantana, pro se.

Noreen Singer, Boca Raton, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm the trial cou rt’s denial of a continuation of an injunction preventing appellee from encumbering he r real property. A “ trial court is afforded broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving or modifying injunctions, and unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonst rated, an appellate court must not disturb the trial court’s decision.” Carricarte v. Carricarte , 961 So. 2d 1019, 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (quoting Jackson v. Echols , 937 So. 2d 1247, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ) . We dismiss this appeal as to the remaining issues raised as they are not within the scope of our jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.

W ARNER , K LINGENSMITH and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

Chance & Anthem, LLC, 

Debtor.

/

Case No.: 18-16248-MAM

Chapter 7

Robert Furr, 

Plaintiff, 

Ad. Proc. No. 19-01298-MAM

v.

Robert Gibson, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 

PROHIBIT FIREARMS (ECF NO. 82)

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Emergency Motion to Prohibit

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 21, 2019.

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 84 Filed 10/21/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Firearms at Robert Gibson Deposition (ECF No. 82) (the “Motion”), which was filed 

on an ex parte basis with the Court. 

The Court, having reviewed the Motion and all exhibits, and being fully 

advised in the premises, hereby ORDERS that:

1. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth herein. 

2. The deposition of Robert Gibson, as such is identified and described in the

Motion, shall be conducted on October 22, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 

B at the United States Bankruptcy Court, Flagler Waterview Building, 

1515 North Flagler Drive, 8th Floor, West Palm Beach, Florida.

###

Copy furnished to:

Jeffrey Siskind, Esq. 

(Attorney Siskind is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon all interested parties 

and file a certificate of service)

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 84 Filed 10/21/19 Page 2 of 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

27598

Vol. 60, No. 100

Wednesday, May 24, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

37 CFR Part 1

[Docket No. 950411099–5099–01]

RIN 0651–AA52

Amendment to Rules for Extension of

Patent Term

Correction

In rule document 95–11787 beginning

on page 25615 in the issue of Friday,

May 12, 1995, make the following

corrections:

1. On page 25616, in the second

column, in the third full paragraph, in

the fourth line, insert ‘‘term’’ after

‘‘patent’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, in the fourth paragraph, in the

fifth line, remove ‘‘further’’.

3. On page 25617, in the second

column, in the first full paragraph, in

the first sentence, ‘‘Section 1750’’

should read ‘‘Section 1760’’.

4. On the same page, in the third

column, under the heading Other

Considerations, in the first full

paragraph, in the last line, ‘‘35091’’

should read ‘‘3501’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 9 and 63

[AD–FRL–5115–7]

RIN 2060–AC14

National Emission Standards for

Chromium Emissions From Hard and

Decorative Chromium Electroplating

and Chromium Anodizing Tanks

Correction

In rule document 95–65 beginning on

page 4948 in the issue of Wednesday,

Janaury 25, 1995, make the following

corrections:

On page 4950, Tables 3 and 4 should

be removed. They appear correctly on

page 4951.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Part 212

[INS No. 1688–95]

RIN 1115–AD89

Waiver of the Two-Year Home Country

Physical Presence Requirements for

Certain Foreign Medical Graduates

Correction

In rule document 95–12272 beginning

on page 26676 in the issue of Thursday,

May 18, 1995, make the following

correction:

§ 212.7 [Corrected]

On page 26681, in the second column,

amendatory instruction 2. to § 212.7

should read as set forth below.

‘‘2. In § 212.7, paragraphs (c)(9) and

(c)(10) are redesignated as paragraphs

(c)(10) and (c)(11), respectively, and a

new paragraph (c)(9) is added to read as

follows:’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD01–95–031]

RIN 2115–AA97

Safety Zone: Macy’s 1995 Fourth of

July Fireworks, East River, NY

Correction

In proposed rule document 95–11659

beginning on page 25189 in the issue of

Thursday, May 11, 1995, make the

following correction:

§ 165.T01–031 [Corrected]

On page 25190, in the third column,

in § 165.T01-031(c)(3)(ii), in the sixth

line, insert the following after

‘‘between’’:

‘‘the Williamsburg Bridge and the

charted position of Buoy 18 (LLNR

27335). These vessels may enter the

zone and proceed to this area between’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Dievlese WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 13, 2018

Dievlese Williams, Chipley, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dievlese Williams appeals the summary denial of both grounds raised in his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Ground Two. However, we reverse the summary denial of Ground One and remand for attachment of portions of the record refuting that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. *See**Freeman v. State*, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) ("[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records *723in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient.").

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Digimarc Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Michael McConnell,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/  MICHAEL MCCONNELL                                |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Michael McConnell  Chief Financial Officer  March 13, 2006 |   |   |

 

----
# L_2004179EN.01000801.xml

| 14.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 968/2004

of 13 May 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 27th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 27th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 49,941 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 May 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p. 7. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2126/2003 (OJ L 319, 4.12.2003, p. 4).

2

---