alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           On the portability of ML-MC as a depth discriminant for small seismic events recorded at local distances      

      September 10, 2019    

In this paper we show that ML-MC is a viable and regionally portable depth discriminant and therefore may contribute in nuclear test ban treaty verification. A recent study found that the difference between local magnitude (ML) and coda duration magnitude (MC) discriminates shallow seismic events (mining blasts, mining-induced earthquakes, and shallow tectonic earthquakes) from deeper tectonic earthquakes in the Utah region. The shallow seismic events had anomalously high MC values, with increasingly negative ML-MC values as depth decreased. Here we evaluate the performance of ML-MC as a depth discriminant in three new regions, finding that ML-MC increases between 0–9 km depth in all cases. Initially, we investigated ML-MC as a function of depth for naturally occurring earthquakes in the region around Yellowstone National Park, as recorded by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations. For 3,358 Yellowstone earthquakes with well-constrained depths, we found ML-MC increased 0.030 ± 0.007 magnitude units (m.u.) for each 1 km increase in depth up to 10 km depth. Next, we examined ML-MC values for anthropogenic seismicity in northern Oklahoma and southern Kansas, as recorded by the National Earthquake Information Center. For 1,628 events with well-constrained depths, we computed a slope for ML-MC of 0.022 ± 0.010 m.u./km. Finally, we analyzed ML-MC for 28,722 well-located earthquakes in Italy, as recorded by the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, and found an ML-MC slope of 0.018 ± 0.001 m.u./km. In each case, the quoted error bounds represent 95% confidence regions which exclude zero, implying that the depth-dependence of ML-MC is statistically significant. We performed several robustness tests in which we varied the criterion used to define a well-constrained depth and the depth range used in the linear fit. In nearly all cases, we found a positive slope for ML-MC vs. depth at a confidence level above 95%.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William L Yeck, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wyeck@usgs.gov

303-273-8648

## Related Content

#### William L Yeck, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wyeck@usgs.gov

303-273-8648

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah
                  -  Montana
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Wyoming
                  -  Kansas
                  -  Oklahoma

View All **
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           River basins of the United States: the Hudson      

      January 1, 1981    

View Report

This leaflet, one of a series on the river basins of the United States, contains information on the Hudson River Basin, including a brief early history, a description of the physical characteristics, and other statistical data. At present, other river basins included in the series are The Colorado, The Columbia, The Delaware, The Potomac, and The Wabash.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - massachusetts
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  New York
                  -  Vermont

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

MOSHE ENBAR, Case No. 16-21262-AJC

Chapter 7

 Debtor. /

MOSHE ENBAR, LINDA ENBAR,

ADAM ENBAR, and MELISSA BENZEL,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Adversary No. 20-01028-AJC

FRED GOODSTEIN and

 MICHELE GOODSTEIN,

Defendants.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION

Part 1: Identify the appellants

1. Name of appellants: Moshe Enbar, Linda Enbar, Adam Enbar, and Melissa

Benzel.

2. Position of appellants in the adversary proceeding or bankruptcy case that is

the subject of this appeal: Plaintiffs

Part 2: Identify the subject of this appeal

1. Describe the judgment, order, or decree appealed from:

Order Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendants, ECF 43.

2. State the date on which the judgment, order, or decree was entered: 

May 26, 2020.
3. Part 3: Identify the other parties to the appeal

List the names of all parties to the judgment, order, or decree appealed from

and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of their attorneys:

1. Parties: Fred Goodstein and Michele Goodstein

Attorneys:

Jeffrey S. Berlowitz, Esq. 

Siegfried Rivera

201 Alhambra Circle, 11th Floor

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Tel (305) 442-3334

Joshua L Mallin, Esq.

Weg and Myers, P.C.

Federal Plaza

52 Duane Street, 2nd Floor

New York, New York 10007

Tel (212) 227-4210

2. Parties: Moshe Enbar, Linda Enbar, Adam Enbar, and Melissa Benzel.

Kevin C Gleason, Esq.

Florida Bankruptcy Group, LLC

4121 N. 31st Avenue

Hollywood, FL 33021-2011

954-893-7670

Part 4: Sign below

Respectfully submitted,

FLORIDA BANKRUPTCY GROUP, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

4121 N. 31st Avenue

Hollywood, FL 33021-2011

T: 954-893-7670/F: 954–252-2540

By: s/Kevin C. Gleason 

Florida Bar No. 369500

BankruptcyLawyer@aol.com (direct email)

kgpaecmf@aol.com (designated email service)

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A.
McCutcheon, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the
Report.

|                     |  |  |  |                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. McCutcheon  
|                     |  |  |  | Name: Jeffrey A. McCutcheon

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1
```

[Federal Register: February 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 24)]
[Notices]               
[Page 6000]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05fe10-48]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0012]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
March 8, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the contact under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The Agency proposes to delete a system of records notice in its 
inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the 
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system 
report.

    Dated: February 1, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S200.50 CAH

SYSTEM NAME:
    Individual Weight Management File (July 14, 1999; 64 FR 37941).

REASON:
    Defense Logistics Agency no longer maintains this system of 
records. Existing records are returned to the military member.

[FR Doc. 2010-2445 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Science and innovation for battling invasive carp      

      March 31, 2022    

View Report

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is the Federal Government’s independent research agency that conducts research to inform management of invasive species. Bighead, black, grass, and silver carp, which are native to China, were originally stocked in aquaculture facilities to control algae, snails, and vegetation. These species have invaded the Mississippi River and are now established throughout the lower and middle Mississippi River Basins and some of its large tributaries where they damage ecosystems and harm economies. A reproducing population of grass carp in Lake Erie is a risk to the $7 billion Great Lakes fishery. The USGS is leading research efforts on risk assessment and on early detection of new invasions. The USGS is also developing and evaluating harvest methods, barriers and deterrents, and baits/attractants to provide Federal and State management agencies the tools needed to manage and reduce populations of these species.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Patrick M Kocovsky

##### Aquatic Invasive Species Program Manager

Ecosystems Mission Area

pkocovsky@usgs.gov

571-205-1487

## Related Content

#### Patrick M Kocovsky

##### Aquatic Invasive Species Program Manager

Ecosystems Mission Area

pkocovsky@usgs.gov

571-205-1487

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Lake Erie
                  -  Mississippi River
                  - Alabama
                  -  Arkansas
                  -  Illinois
                  -  Indiana
                  -  Iowa
                  -  Kansas
                  -  Kentucky
                  -  Louisiana
                  -  Michigan
                  -  Minnesota
                  -  Mississippi
                  -  Missouri
                  -  Nebraska
                  -  New York
                  -  Ohio
                  -  Oklahoma
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  South Dakota
                  -  Tennessee
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah
                  -  West Virginia
                  -  Wisconsin

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          44,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                       208
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,475
<PP&E>                                           2,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                     990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,720
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,178
<SALES>                                         10,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,151
<CGS>                                            2,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,307)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.20)


</TABLE>
ex10_27.htm




Exhibit 10.27







KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST







Schedule of Non-Employee Trustee Fees and Other Compensation


 



	
Annual Retainer

	  	
$25,000 (1)


	  	  	  
	
Board Meeting Fees (telephonic and in-person)

	  	
$1,000


	  	  	  
	
Committee Meeting Fees (telephonic and in-person)

	  	
$1,000


	  	  	  
	
Committee Chair Annual Retainer

	  	
Audit Committee: $10,000


Compensation Committee: $7,500


Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: $5,000


	  	  	  
	
Lead Trustee Retainer

	  	
$10,000


	  	  	  
	
Annual Restricted Share Awards

	  	
Upon initial election, each trustee receives 3,000 restricted shares that vest 1 year from date of grant.


 


On an annual basis each year after their initial election, each trustee will receive restricted shares with a value of $25,000 that vest 1 year from the date of grant.













	
  

	
(1)                                The Board of Trustees receives approximately one-half of their $25,000 annual retainer in common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company. Trustees receive approximately 50% of the quarterly payment in common shares pursuant to unrestricted share grants under the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and the remainder in cash. The number of common shares to be issued each quarter will be based on the closing price of the common shares on the second business day after public release of the Company’s financial data for the preceding calendar quarter (rounded down to the nearest whole common share).







 







Effective: May 2011
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Pacific tsunami warning system      

      January 1, 1986    

Of all natural disasters, tsunamis are among the most terrifying and complex phenomena, responsible for great loss of lives and vast destruction of property. Enormous destruction of coastal communities has taken place throughout the world by such great waves since the beginning of recorded history.

The impact of tsunamis on human societies can be traced back in written history to 480 BC, when the Minoan civilization in the Eastern Mediterranean was wiped out by great tsunami waves generated by the volcanic explosion of the island of Santorin. In the Pacific Ocean where the majority of these waves have been generated, the historical record, although brief, shows tremendous destruction. In Japan which has one of the most populated coastal regions in the world and a long history of earthquake activity, tsunamis have destroyed entire coastal communities. There is also history of tsunami destruction in Alaska, in Hawaiian Islands, and in South America. 

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60314]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: July 12, 2004 |  | /s/    CAROLYN V.
AVER                 
|                    |  | Carolyn V. Aver Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Agile Software Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act Filing of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Agile Software Corporation and will be retained by Agile Software Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling seasonal dynamics of small fish cohorts in fluctuating freshwater marsh landscapes      

      January 1, 2010    

Small-bodied fishes constitute an important assemblage in many wetlands. In wetlands that dry periodically except for small permanent waterbodies, these fishes are quick to respond to change and can undergo large fluctuations in numbers and biomasses. An important aspect of landscapes that are mixtures of marsh and permanent waterbodies is that high rates of biomass production occur in the marshes during flooding phases, while the permanent waterbodies serve as refuges for many biotic components during the dry phases. The temporal and spatial dynamics of the small fishes are ecologically important, as these fishes provide a crucial food base for higher trophic levels, such as wading birds. We develop a simple model that is analytically tractable, describing the main processes of the spatio-temporal dynamics of a population of small-bodied fish in a seasonal wetland environment, consisting of marsh and permanent waterbodies. The population expands into newly flooded areas during the wet season and contracts during declining water levels in the dry season. If the marsh dries completely during these times (a drydown), the fish need refuge in permanent waterbodies. At least three new and general conclusions arise from the model: (1) there is an optimal rate at which fish should expand into a newly flooding area to maximize population production; (2) there is also a fluctuation amplitude of water level that maximizes fish production, and (3) there is an upper limit on the number of fish that can reach a permanent waterbody during a drydown, no matter how large the marsh surface area is that drains into the waterbody. Because water levels can be manipulated in many wetlands, it is useful to have an understanding of the role of these fluctuations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Don DeAngelis, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

don_deangelis@usgs.gov

305-284-1690

## Related Content

#### Don DeAngelis, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

don_deangelis@usgs.gov

305-284-1690

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956