alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Population persistence in Florida torreya: Comparing modeled projections of a declining coniferous tree      

      January 1, 2000    

The Florida torreya (  Torreya taxifolia) is a coniferous tree endemic to a 35-km stretch of bluffs and ravines along the east side of the Apalachicola River in northern Florida and southern Georgia. This formerly locally abundant tree has declined as a result of disease during the 1950s and is on the U.S. endangered species list. With no seed production in the wild, this species is headed toward extinction. We conducted a survey on roughly 200 trees from 1988 to 1996 and used these data to estimate the likelihood of population persistence during the next several decades. We compared a stage-class transition matrix model ( RAMAS) and an individual-based stochastic model ( TORSIM) of growth and mortality to project future populations. Given the current lack of seed production in the wild, all models predict extinction. The question of concern is the imminence of this predicted extinction. Differing predicted times to extinction would suggest different immediate management recommendations. Both models predicted an over 90% likelihood of persistence during the next 50 years. Predictions differed in that the transition matrix model was less optimistic than the individual-based model regarding persistence. Model sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust to significant decreases in growth and sprouting probabilities. Submodels identified different persistence likelihoods in different populations. Nonetheless, unless management of the population can facilitate maturation and seed production, extinction of this species in the wild is inevitable.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Phillip  van Mantgem

##### Research Ecologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

pvanmantgem@usgs.gov

707-825-5189

## Related Content

#### Phillip  van Mantgem

##### Research Ecologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

pvanmantgem@usgs.gov

707-825-5189

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8576

BILLY G. ASEMANI, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE OF MARYLAND; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary; J. MICHAEL 

STOUFFER, Commissioner; KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

STEPHANIE JUDITH LANE WEBER, 

 Party-in-Interest - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-02618-RDB) 

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009 

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane 

Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order in 

this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Asemani v. Maryland, 

No. 1:08-cv-02618-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2008). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Form CGFCRD3 (4/4/2019)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−10747−LMI

Chapter: 7

In re:

Nibaldo Dominguez Morales

aka Nibaldo Dominguez, aka Nibaldo Morales

19521 Holiday Road

Miami, FL 33157

SSN: xxx−xx−1462

RENOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on April 16, 2020 at 09:30 AM at the following

location:

C. Clyde Atkins U.S. Courthouse

301 North Miami Avenue

Courtroom 8

Miami FL 33128

**EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY** Until further notice or unless directed otherwise, the court will ONLY hold

Telephonic hearings. The following telephonic service providers CourtCall (888) 882−6878 or Court

Solutions (917) 746−7476) will be permitted in ALL matters. Visit the court website to determine which

service provider is being used by the presiding judge. Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to

use the telephonic services FREE of charge. All attorneys shall advise their clients NOT to appear at the

courthouse.

to consider the following:

Reaffirmation Agreement with Exeter Finance LLC Filed by Creditor Exeter Finance LLC. (AIS Data

Services (ANRawal)) (13) NOTE: Debtor's presence is imperative to protect their rights. Debtor

represented by counsel must reach out to their attorney at least (48) hours prior to the date of the

hearing to arrange for Court Call appearance.

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party

who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard

thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Case 20-10747-LMI Doc 20 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Dated: 3/16/20 CLERK OF COURT

By: Noemi Sanabria

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-10747-LMI Doc 20 Filed 03/16/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Planetary science decadal survey planetary mission concept study report: Ceres: Exploration of Ceres’ habitability      

      June 30, 2020    

Dwarf planet Ceres is a compelling target as an evolved ocean world with, at least, regional brine reservoirs and potentially ongoing geological activity. As the most water-rich body in the inner solar system (in relative abundance), it is a representative of the population of planetesimals that brought volatiles and organics to the inner solar system. Situated in the Main Belt of asteroids, Ceres is accessible enough for a sample return with the resources of a typical medium-class (New Frontiers) NASA mission. Under the Discovery program, Dawn explored Ceres from 2015 to 2018. The extensive dataset revealed the presence of liquid, brine-driven activity, organic matter, and a rich salt chemistry. With this evidence, the overarching goals of the mission concept presented herein are to quantify Ceres’ current habitability potential and origin.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael Bland, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist 

Astrogeology Science Center

mbland@usgs.gov

928-556-7080

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Michael Bland, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist 

Astrogeology Science Center

mbland@usgs.gov

928-556-7080

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - CERES

View All **
Susan GALANTE, Appellant, v. Timothy GIPE, Appellee.

No. 3D18-26

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
09/17/201 0 1G;5 2 FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S 1001/00 1

Cas e No . 2010NM73000 3 

### DEPARTMEN T O F •^ANSPORWiO N C'E T OPERATION S 8-23-1 0

If : ''4 : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave . S . W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention ; Hearin g IX^ciceiClerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Buildin g Roo

m2W100 0 

### ^ P 7 0 A q

: 0 3 

# t9\M^b ^ I20/0'019 3 V o Glenn H . Brow n an

dwhomever

els e i t ma y concern . Upo n receivin g you r

Kina l Notic e o f

Propose d Civi l Penalt

y o n 7-26-1 0 i n th e amoiin l ol " $3500.00, 1 contacte dyou o n 7-30-1 0 an

d discusse d th e reaso n for th e dela y o f respons e an dlac k o f respons e t o th e informa

l conference , du e t o th e lac k o f m y attorney' s hel p dealin g with thi s issue . I aske dyo u to sen d me th e emai l yo u had sen t to m y attorney , whic h cause dafurthe

r delay becaus e h e neve r

forwarde d th e emai l t

o me . Yo u forwarde dth e emai l t o m

e o n 7-30-10 , an d I followe d th e instruction s yo u ha d liste d i n th e email . 1 calle dyou on 8-06-1 0 an d informe d yo u I ha d complete d th e ta.sks li.ste d i n your email , and1 followe dyour instruction s by emailin g yo u alis t o f ih c name s an

d telephon e number s o f

1 0 individual. ^ T ha

d educate d wit

h th e publication s yo u ha

d ni e download

- Yo u tol dm e you wuul d cal l m c nex t wee k and discus s th e option s a s yo u wer e no t i n apositio n t o discus s th e matter a i tha t lime . A s o f

8-23-10, 1 hav e no t

yet heardbac k

fro myou . No w i t i s beyondth e 1 5 da

y perio d t o respon d t o th e letter . T a msendin g thi s respons e requestin g apropose dpenall y amount o f $500.0 0 i n a

n effor t t o resolv e thi s matter . I f m y propose damoun t

i s no t acceptable , 1 woul d like t o reques t ahearing , sinc e w e were unabl e t o com e to some sor

t o f a n agreemen t

wit h th e propose d civi l penalt y dolla r amount . Bradl y D . Wheele r 11 5 Lillia n Dr . Silka , A K 9983 5 CC : Glen n H.Brow n 22 2 W . 7"'Ave . #1 4 Anchorage , AK

99513-758 7 0'-; 5 .. . a'^ f
Shaine A. ARMIJO, doc# D46849, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Frederick W. Volrath, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cornelius C. Demps, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetotelluric investigations of the Kīlauea Volcano, Hawaii      

      August 22, 2022    

In 2002 and 2003 a collaborative effort was undertaken between Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Menlo Park, the USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, and Electromagnetic Instruments Inc. to study the Kīlauea volcano in Hawaii using the magnetotelluric (MT) technique. The work was motivated by a desire to improve understanding of the magma reservoirs and conduits within Kīlauea and the East and Southwest Rift zones, which has implications for understanding Kīlauea's plumbing system. An improved understanding of the rift zones has implications in understanding large-scale landslides that are generated in the Hilina Slump, which produce significant impacts on coastal communities. Up to eight stations operated simultaneously, with multiple remote reference sites, and data were processed using multi-station robust processing techniques. In total, data were acquired at 70 sites over the Southwest and East rift zones. Good to excellent quality data were obtained even in the harshest conditions, such as those encountered on the fresh lava flows of the East Rift Zone, where electrical contact resistances are on the order of 100 kΩ. A three-dimensional (3D) MT model study was done to guide interpretation of the observed MT measurements. Synthetic modeling demonstrates that conductive bodies in the upper 3 km can be spatially resolved where MT station sampling is good. Resistivity anomalies in the 3D inversions have a high degree of spatial correlation with previously published seismic velocity anomalies beneath Kīlauea. Melt fractions between 0.096 and 0.117 are calculated for the Kīlauea and Puʻuʻōʻō low resistivity anomalies, respectively.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Jim Kauahikaua (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geophysicist

Hawaiian Volcano Observatory

## Related Content

####             Jim Kauahikaua (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geophysicist

Hawaiian Volcano Observatory

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Kilauea Volcano
                  - Hawai'i

View All **
JAMES S. CIROTA

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3509

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge.

James S. Cirota, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross , Assistant

Attorney General

, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modern Mars' geomorphological activity, driven by wind, frost, and gravity      

      January 30, 2021    

Extensive evidence of landform-scale martian geomorphic changes has been acquired in the last decade, and the number and range of examples of surface activity have increased as more high-resolution imagery has been acquired. Within the present-day Mars climate, wind and frost/ice are the dominant drivers, resulting in large avalanches of material down icy, rocky, or sandy slopes; sediment transport leading to many scales of aeolian bedforms and erosion; pits of various forms and patterned ground; and substrate material carved out from under subliming ice slabs. Due to the ability to collect correlated observations of surface activity and new landforms with relevant environmental conditions with spacecraft on or around Mars, studies of martian geomorphologic activity are uniquely positioned to directly test surface-atmosphere interaction and landform formation/evolution models outside of Earth. In this paper, we outline currently observed and interpreted surface activity occurring within the modern Mars environment, and tie this activity to wind, seasonal surface CO2 frost/ice, sublimation of subsurface water ice, and/or gravity drivers. Open questions regarding these processes are outlined, and then measurements needed for answering these questions are identified. In the final sections, we discuss how many of these martian processes and landforms may provide useful analogs for conditions and processes active on other planetary surfaces, with an emphasis on those that stretch the bounds of terrestrial-based models or that lack terrestrial analogs. In these ways, modern Mars presents a natural and powerful comparative planetology base case for studies of Solar System surface processes, beyond or instead of Earth.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Colin Dundas, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

cdundas@usgs.gov

928-556-7143

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Colin Dundas, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

cdundas@usgs.gov

928-556-7143

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60310]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.





Date:
                August 25, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Liu BoLiu
                Bo
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer)
# L_2004295EN.01001701.xml

| 18.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1631/2004

of 17 September 2004

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 of 13 July 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (2), and in particular Article 8(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches 310 936 040 EUR while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates for use from 1 October 2004 as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is 114 000 000 EUR. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches 310 936 040 EUR while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates for use from 1 October 2004 as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is 114 000 000 EUR.

| (2) | A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 October 2004 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 October 2004 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts for applications of refund certificates for use from 1 October 2004 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,634.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 September 2004.

For the Commission

Olli REHN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

2

---