## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Scaling up watershed model parameters: flow and load simulations of the Edisto River Basin, South Carolina, 2007-09      

      July 2, 2014    

View Document

As part of an ongoing effort by the U.S. Geological Survey to expand the understanding of relations among hydrologic, geochemical, and ecological processes that affect fish-tissue mercury concentrations within the Edisto River Basin, analyses and simulations of the hydrology of the Edisto River Basin were made using the topography-based hydrological model (TOPMODEL). A primary focus of the investigation was to assess the potential for scaling up a previous application of TOPMODEL for the McTier Creek watershed, which is a small headwater catchment to the Edisto River Basin. Scaling up was done in a step-wise manner, beginning with applying the calibration parameters, meteorological data, and topographic-wetness-index data from the McTier Creek TOPMODEL to the Edisto River TOPMODEL. Additional changes were made for subsequent simulations, culminating in the best simulation, which included meteorological and topographic wetness index data from the Edisto River Basin and updated calibration parameters for some of the TOPMODEL calibration parameters. The scaling-up process resulted in nine simulations being made. Simulation 7 best matched the streamflows at station 02175000, Edisto River near Givhans, SC, which was the downstream limit for the TOPMODEL setup, and was obtained by adjusting the scaling factor, including streamflow routing, and using NEXRAD precipitation data for the Edisto River Basin. The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of model-fit efficiency and Pearson’s correlation coefficient for simulation 7 were 0.78 and 0.89, respectively. Comparison of goodness-of-fit statistics between measured and simulated daily mean streamflow for the McTier Creek and Edisto River models showed that with calibration, the Edisto River TOPMODEL produced slightly better results than the McTier Creek model, despite the substantial difference in the drainage-area size at the outlet locations for the two models (30.7 and 2,725 square miles, respectively).

Along with the TOPMODEL hydrologic simulations, a visualization tool (the Edisto River Data Viewer) was developed to help assess trends and influencing variable in the stream ecosystem. Incorporated into the visualization tool were the water-quality load models TOPLOAD, TOPLOAD–H, and LOADEST. Because the focus of this investigation was on scaling up the models from McTier Creek, water-quality concentrations that were previously collected in the McTier Creek Basin were used in the water-quality load models.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Toby D Feaster

##### Hydrologist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

tfeaster@usgs.gov

803-750-6100

#### Jimmy M Clark

##### Assistant Director for Studies

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

jmclark@usgs.gov

803-750-6114

#### Paul M Bradley

##### Research Ecologist/Hydrologist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

pbradley@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Toby D Feaster

##### Hydrologist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

tfeaster@usgs.gov

803-750-6100

#### Jimmy M Clark

##### Assistant Director for Studies

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

jmclark@usgs.gov

803-750-6114

#### Paul M Bradley

##### Research Ecologist/Hydrologist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

pbradley@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Edisto River basin
                  - South Carolina

View All **