alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
                                     BY THE
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Each of Thomas J. Mazzarisi, Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen J.
Schoepfer, Chief Financial Officer, of JAG Media Holdings, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
July 31, 2005 ("Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi                        /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer
----------------------------------             --------------------------------
Name: Thomas J. Mazzarisi                      Name: Stephen J. Schoepfer


Date: November 7, 2005
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Revised volcanic history of the San Juan, Uncompahgre, Silverton, and Lake City calderas in the western San Juan Mountains, Colorado      

      November 1, 1973    

View Report

The sequence of mid-Cenozoic volcanic events in the western San Juan Mountains is closely analogous to that elsewhere in the San Juan volcanic field. The Lake Fork, Picayune, and San Juan Formations were erupted from a cluster of central volcanoes from 35 to 30 m.y. ago, when dominant activity shifted to more silicic ash-flow eruptions with accompanying caldera collapses. The Uncompahgre and San Juan calderas, each about 20 km across, formed mainly from eruption of the 28-m.y.-old Sapinero Mesa Tuff. Collapse occurred concurrently with eruption, and intracaldera tuffs accumulated to a thickness of more than 700 m. Both calderas were resurgently domed together; the northeast-trending Eureka graben formed along the distended crest of that dome. The Uncompahgre caldera was then flooded by several 27- to 28-m.y.-old ash-flow sheets from easterly sources, and also by one apparently erupted from the Silverton caldera nested within the older San Juan caldera. The Lake City caldera, located within the older Uncompahgre caldera, formed about 22.5 m.y. ago in response to eruption of the Sunshine Peak Tuff.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter W Lipman, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

plipman@usgs.gov

650-269-5295

## Related Content

#### Peter W Lipman, PhD

##### Scientist Emeritus

California Volcano Observatory

plipman@usgs.gov

650-269-5295

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - united states of america
                  - San Juan Mountains
                  - Colorado

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30530]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 13 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 13 Filed 03/16/20 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q/A for the period ended  March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel
      Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934;
                and  (2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.





Date:
                July 25, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Samuel ShengSamuel
                Sheng
              Chief
                Financial Officer (principal financial and
              accounting
                officer)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

p0129 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139021

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139021 COA: 290008 Wayne CC: 04-008300 JONATHAN PATRICK ROSE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 13, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Morphology of Lonar Crater, India: Comparisons and implications      

      January 1, 1980    

Lonar Crater is a young meteorite impact crater emplaced in Deccan basalt. Data from 5 drillholes, a gravity network, and field mapping are used to reconstruct its original dimensions, delineate the nature of the pre-impact target rocks, and interpret the emplacement mode of the ejecta. Our estimates of the pre-erosion dimensions are: average diameter of 1710 m; average rim height of 40 m (30-35 m of rim rock uplift, 5-10 m of ejected debris); depth of 230-245 m (from rim crest to crater floor). The crater's circularity index is 0.9 and is unlikely to have been lower in the past. There are minor irregularities in the original crater floor (present sediment-breccia boundary) possibly due to incipient rebound effects. A continuous ejecta blanket extends an average of 1410 m beyond the pre-erosion rim crest. In general, 'fresh' terrestrial craters, less than 10 km in diameter, have smaller depth/diameter and larger rim height/diameter ratios than their lunar counterparts. Both ratios are intermediate for Mercurian craters, suggesting that crater shape is gravity dependent, all else being equal. Lonar demonstrates that all else is not always equal. Its depth/diameter ratio is normal but, because of less rim rock uplift, its rim height/diameter ratio is much smaller than both 'fresh' terrestrial and lunar impact craters. The target rock column at Lonar consists of one or more layers of weathered, soft basalt capped by fresh, dense flows. Plastic deformation and/or compaction of this lower, incompetent material probably absorbed much of the energy normally available in the cratering process for rim rock uplift. A variety of features within the ejecta blanket and the immediately underlying substrate, plus the broad extent of the blanket boundaries, suggest that a fluidized debris surge was the dominant mechanism of ejecta transportation and deposition at Lonar. In these aspects, Lonar should be a good analog for the 'fluidized craters' of Mars. ?? 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Co.

## Citation Information
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

d0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

137669

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137669 COA: 280601 Dickinson CC: 06-003660-FC PHILLIP GREGORY BAL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 23, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel A. Judd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15-d14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  I have reviewed the Report;



2.  Based upon my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;



3.  Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;



4.  I and the other certifying officers of the Company:

·are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company;

·have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;

·have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the reporting period; and

·have presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation.



5.  I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

·all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls (a pre-existing term relating to internal controls regarding financial reporting) which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

·any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls.



6.  I and the other certifying officers have indicated in the Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/ Daniel A. Judd

Daniel A. Judd

Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  August 16, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20807]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 87

[GEN Docket No. 90-56; FCC 95-267]


Mobile-Satellite Service and Aeronautical Telementry

Correction

    In rule document 95-17509 beginning on page 37828 in the issue of 
Monday, July 24, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 87.187  [Corrected]

    On page 37829, in the second column, in Sec. 87.187(p), in the 
first line, ``1435.1525'' should read ``1435-1525''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Prolonged drought in a northern California coastal region suppresses wildfire impacts on hydrology      

      July 21, 2023    

Wildfires naturally occur in many landscapes, however they are undergoing rapid regime shifts. Despite the emphasis in the literature on the most severe hydrological responses to wildfire, there remains a knowledge gap on the thresholds of wildfire (i.e. burned area/drainage area ratio, BAR) required to initiate hydrological responses. We investigated hydrological changes in the Russian River Watershed (RRW) in California, a coastal, Mediterranean, drought-prone, wildfire-adapted ecosystem, following ten wildfires that burned 30% of the watershed. Our findings suggest that sub-watersheds of the RRW have not burned beyond an intrinsic, unknown, threshold required to initiate change. Using paired watersheds, we examined spatiotemporal patterns of pre-and-post wildfire hydrology with a rainfall-runoff hydrological model. Even though these successive wildfires burned 1-50% of each sub-watershed (1-30% at moderate/high severity), we found little evidence of wildfire-related shifts in hydrology. As a function of BAR, wildfire imposed limited effects on runoff ratios (runoff/precipitation) and runoff residuals (observations - model simulations). Our findings that post-wildfire runoff enhancements asymptote beyond 30% burn indicate that when a watershed is burned beyond a certain threshold, the magnitude of the hydrologic response no longer increases. Drought and storm conditions explained much of the variability observed in streamflow, whereas wildfire explained only moderate variability in streamflow even when wildfire accounted for >45% BAR. While the BAR in the RRW was sufficiently beyond previously reported minimum disturbance thresholds (>20% burned forest), the lack of hydrological response is attributed to buffering effects of wildfire adaptation and drought factors that are unique to Mediterranean ecoregions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jennifer Underwood

##### Microbiologist

Water Resources Mission Area

jcunder@usgs.gov

303-541-3033

#### Sheila Murphy

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

sfmurphy@usgs.gov

303-541-3023

## Related Content

#### Jennifer Underwood

##### Microbiologist

Water Resources Mission Area

jcunder@usgs.gov

303-541-3033

#### Sheila Murphy

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

sfmurphy@usgs.gov

303-541-3023

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california
                  - Russian River watershed

View All **
EXHIBIT 4.5

                          STOCKHOLDER LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


February 10, 2000.

BROWSESAFE.COM, INC..
335 West 9th Street, Suite 100
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-3003
Attention: Mark Smith

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the terms of a Letter of Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000
(the "Agreement") between California Applied Research, Inc. (the "undersigned")
and BROWSESAFE.COM, INC. (the "Company"), the undersigned will receive up to
6,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company
(the "Shares") that are subject to a Registration Rights Agreement.

In order to induce the Company to enter into the Letter of Agreement, the
undersigned hereby agrees as follows:

        1. After registration, the undersigned will not sell, offer to sell,
contract to sell, sell any option or contract for the sale or purchase of, lend,
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another any of the
economic consequences of ownership of, or otherwise dispose of (collectively,
"transfer") the Shares except as follows: up to 1/3 of the of the shares may be
sold immediately; an additional 1/3 of the shares may be sold within ninety
(90); and the remaining 1/3 of the shares may be sold within one hundred and
eighty (180) days. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if the undersigned is
a corporation, partnership or limited liability company, the undersigned shall
not be restricted from distributing any or all of the Shares to its
shareholders, partners or members and the subsequent Transfers of Shares by such
shareholders, partners or members.

        2. The undersigned acknowledges that the Company may impose stock
transfer restrictions on the Shares to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.

        3. This restriction shall terminate on February 10, 2001.

Very truly yours,

California Applied Research, Inc. (the "Undersigned ")

By:  /S/
     -----------------------------------


AGREED TO:
BROWSESAFE.COM, INC. (the "Company")

By:  /S/
     -----------------------------------
                         Dated as of February 10, 2000.
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.: 20-14643-AJC

Chapter 13

Yosbel R Morales Reyes

 

 Debtor(s) /

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION 

TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority status 

of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify which 

claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. Upon the filing of this 

objection an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled on the date already scheduled 

for the confirmation hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the [trustee][debtor] 

objects to the following claim filed in this case:

Claim Amount of

No. Name of Claimant Claim 

14 Regions Mortgage $142,774.36 

Basis for Objection and Recommended Disposition

On or about May 19, 2020, Creditor filed a secured proof of claim in the amount of $142,774.36 

and an arrearage in the amount of $2,371.30 for the Debtor’s homestead property with an 

account number ending in xxxxxxxxx3029. The Debtor’s plan reflects that this claim will be 

paid directly to the Creditor and outside the bankruptcy plan. Therefore, Debtor requests the 

claim be allowed as filed with no distribution from the Chapter 13 Trustee.

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this objection will 

be served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the confirmation hearing date and 

that a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the court when 

the objection and notice of hearing are served.

DATED: May 21, 2020 Respectfully Submitted: 

Robert Sanchez, P.A.

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Fl. Bar No. 0442161

Telephone: (305) 687-8008

E-Mail: court@bankruptcyclinic.com

Case 20-14643-AJC Doc 15 Filed 05/21/20 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1978
BERTHA BIAS, Widow of Cecil Bias, Petitioner, versus SHARPLES COAL CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (98-650-BLA) Submitted: April 10, 2000 Decided: September 12, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger D. Forman, FORMAN & CRANE, L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. William S. Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bertha Bias, widow of Cecil Bias, seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order reversing the Administrative Law Judge's decision to grant black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record confirms that the Board's conclusion that the ALJ’s decision was not based upon substantial evidence is correct and we further find that the Board’s decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Bias v. Sharples Coal Co. , BRB No. 98-650-BLA (B.R.B. June 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2006186EN.01006001.xml

| 7.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/60

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 812/2004 of 26 April 2004 laying down measures concerning incidental catches of cetaceans in fisheries and amending Regulation (EC) No 88/98

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 30 April 2004
  , corrected by
  Official Journal of the European Union L 185 of 24 May 2004
  )

On page 7, in Article 9, paragraph 1:

for:

‘1.   From 1 January laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred 2008, it shall be prohibited to keep on board, or use for fishing, driftnets.’,

read:

‘1.   From 1 January 2008, it shall be prohibited to keep on board, or use for fishing, driftnets.’

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10210]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Periodic Financial Report



(Section 906 Certification)



Thomas E. Vessey and Beth Sanders hereby certify as follows:



1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of 1st Centennial Bancorp.



2. The Form 10-Q of 1st Centennial Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of 1st Centennial Bancorp.



|                        |  |  |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 09, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas E. Vessey                     
|                        |  |  |  | Thomas E. Vessey, Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 09, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Beth Sanders                     
|                        |  |  |  | Beth Sanders, Chief Financial Officer