alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-137162)of
CardioGenics Holdings Inc. of our report dated July 29, 2009 relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of CardioGenics Holdings Inc. [formerly
CardioGenics Inc., (a development stage company)], as of October 31, 2008 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
 
 
 
 (Signed)
“BDO Canada
LLP”
 
 Chartered
Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
 
 Toronto,
Ontario
 February
12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED 9/30/00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      555
<ALLOWANCES>                                       497
<INVENTORY>                                      9,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,813
<PP&E>                                           3,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              110
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,891
<SALES>                                          6,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,320
<CGS>                                            7,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,441)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.89)


</TABLE>
Floyd D. HORNE, Appellant, v. Dr. Paul STEINBERG and Dr. Marcus Frey, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# L_2004343EN.01002201.xml

| 19.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 343/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 343/22

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1985/2004

of 18 November 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 238/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003, on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 238/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 238/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 12 to 18 November 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 238/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 November 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 23.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2235/2000 (OJ L 256, 10.10.2000, p. 13).

3

---
exhibit10_11.htm










Exhibit 10.11


 











 



	 	 	 Quinn J. Hebert 

 President and Chief Executive Officer


 















 


 


January 20, 2009

















John R. Abadie, Jr.


4002 Oak Shadows Court


Sugarland, TX  77479








	
  

	
RE:

	
Retention Agreement












Dear John:







The purpose of this letter is to memorialize our mutual agreement with respect to certain retention benefits that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cal Dive International, Inc. (the “Company”) has approved conditioned upon your compliance with the terms of this letter.  The benefits granted in this letter agreement shall be in addition to any benefits to which you may be entitled under the terms of, that certain Severance and Change of Control Agreement, by and between the Company and you dated as of January 1, 2009 (the “Severance Agreement”).








	
1.  

	
If you choose to retire or otherwise voluntarily leave the employ of the Company without “good reason” as defined in the Severance Agreement prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of this letter, all unvested shares of restricted common stock of Cal Dive International, Inc. that you hold on the date of termination of employment will continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedules applicable to such shares; provided that you continue to comply with the terms of Article 5, Section 5.2 of the Severance Agreement (the “non-competition covenant”) for two years following such termination.  If you violate the non-competition covenant, all shares of unvested restricted stock then held by you shall be forfeited.













	
2.  

	
If you remain employed full-time and in good standing with the Company through the third anniversary of the date of this letter, you shall receive an extra grant of restricted stock worth $150,000, with the number of shares granted based on the closing share price on the date of grant, and such shares shall vest 100% on the date of grant.  This grant shall be in addition to any other grant of restricted stock that you may receive as part of the Company’s annual grant program as may be in place at that time for similarly situated employees.












If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please signify by signing below.













	  	  	
Sincerely,


	  	  	  
	  	  	
/s/ Quinn J. Hébert


	  	  	  
	  	  	
Quinn J. Hébert












AGREED and ACCEPTED this 20th day


of January, 2009.












   /s/ John R. Abadie, Jr.  


                                                      


John R. Abadie, Jr.


 


 


 


 


 










	  2500 CityWest Boulevard, Suite 2200 Ÿ Houston, TX 77042 Ÿ Phone (713) 586-7317 Ÿ Fax (713) 361-2682
Juan Francisco VEGA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Robert W. GERMAINE, Clerk, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1312

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied as moot.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17E0042. KAILA v. SINHA et al.

Sanjeev Kaila, M.D., has moved under Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b) for an

emergency stay of the trial court’s March 16, 2017 order to the extent that order

compels him to produce certain documents and information which he contends are

restricted and confidential under Canadian law. Dr. Kaila also asks this Court to stay

his deposition scheduled for April 12, 2017, wherein he maintains he will be asked

to testify about the allegedly restricted and confidential information. Under our Rule

40 (b), this Court may issue such orders as may be necessary to preserve jurisdiction

of an appeal or to prevent the contested issue from becoming moot.

This motion concerns a ruling on a discovery dispute in ongoing litigation. An

interlocutory order, which is at issue here, may be appealed by application upon

compliance with the provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including, among other

things, timely certification by the trial court that immediate review shall be had. 

From the information provided to this Court, it does not appear that Dr. Kaila has

sought to appeal the trial court’s March 16, 2017 order through the interlocutory

appeal process. Contempt orders are immediately appealable under OCGA § 5-6-34

(a) (2), but Dr. Kaila has not been held in contempt of the March 16, 2017 order. Dr.

Kaila filed a “Notice of Rule 40 (b) Appeal” in the court below, but his request for

relief under this Court’s Rule 40 (b) did not initiate a direct or interlocutory appeal

from the March 16, 2017 order. 

ThisCourt will exercise its powers under Rule 40 (b) sparingly, and, generally,

no order or direction will be given in an appeal until docketed in this Court. No

appeal or application for appeal in this matter has been docketed in this Court. Nor

April 11, 2017
has Dr. Kaila, who has not yet complied or refused to comply with the trial court’s

order, demonstrated that the contested issues addressed in the trial court’s order will

necessarily become moot. For the foregoing reasons, Dr. Kaila’s motion is DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/11/2017
Norman Duggan HOLMAN, Sr. v. Sara Walden HOLMAN

2150987

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 77 (Friday, April 19, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 17355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20419]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 77 / Friday, April 19, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 17355]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT-96-45-002]


Honeoye Storage Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

Correction

    In notice document 96-9311 appearing on page 16631 in the issue of 
Tuesday, April 16, 1996, the Docket number should read as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−25851−AJC

Chapter: 13

In re:

Sonia Vales

20275 NE 2nd Avenue #9

Miami FL 33179

SSN: XXX−XX−6493

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on 03/24/2020 at 09:00AM at the following location:

C. Clyde Atkins U.S. Courthouse, 301 N Miami Ave Courtroom 7 (AJC), Miami, FL 33128

to consider the following:

[35] Objection to Claim of Ro−Mont South Condominium L Inc. [# 4], Filed by Debtor Sonia Vales

(Lombardi, Carolina)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and shall

file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party who fails

to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities. Electronic

devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras), iPads, tablets,

pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are not permitted in

the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for cameras not

integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar identification card,

attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses subpoenaed to appear in

a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited electronic device into a

federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge and verified by the United

States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 2/13/2020

By: Carolina A Lombardi

Case 19-25851-AJC Doc 36 Filed 02/13/20 Page 1 of 1
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 20, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-01047-CV MICHAEL LOVE, Appellant V. MESA VERDE ASSETS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 007-01693-2018



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, J ustice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statem ent, clerk’s record, and report er’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated September 12, 2018, we notified ap pellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated September 12, 2018, we informed appellant the d ocketing statement in this cas e was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days mi ght result in the dismissal of this appeal without f urther notice. In letters dated September 27, 2018, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. W e directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written–2– documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed with out payment of costs within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would resul t in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the fi ling fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corres ponded with the Court regardi ng the status of t his appeal. Accordingly, we dism iss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

181047F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MICHAEL LOVE, Appellant
No. 05-18-01047-CV V. MESA VERDE ASSETS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 007-01693-2018. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee MESA VERDE ASSETS, LLC recover its costs, if any , of this appeal from appellant MICHAEL LOVE.
Judgment entered December 20, 2018.
Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 1 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 2 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 3 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 4 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 5 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 6 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 7 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 8 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 9 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 10 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 11 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 12 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 13 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 14 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 15 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 16 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 17 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 18 of 19

Case 19-24100-RAM    Doc 24    Filed 12/30/19    Page 19 of 19
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

54490

Vol. 61, No. 203

Friday, October 18, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97-9-000]

Koch Gateway Pipeline Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

Correction

In notice document 96–25856

appearing on page 52930 in the issue of

Wednesday, October 9, 1996, the docket

line should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP96-398-000]

Transwestern Pipeline Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

Correction

In notice document 96–25852

appearing on page 52935 in the issue of

Wednesday, October 9, 1996, the docket

line should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP96-400-000 and RP89-183-

064]

Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas

Tariff

Correction

In notice document 96–25854

appearing on page 52936 in the issue of

Wednesday, October 9, 1996, the docket

line should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

48 CFR Part 1212

RIN 2105-AC-59

Revision of Department of

Transportation Regulations;

Correction

Correction

In rule document 96–25884 appearing

on page 53677 in the issue of October

15, 1996, make the following correction:

PART 1212—[CORRECTED]

On page 53677, in the third column,

in amendatory instruction 10., remove

the period (.) after ‘‘above’’ and insert ‘‘,

and the part is removed and reserved.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Karim HirjiKarim Hirji, Chief Financial Officer
2012 Annual Base Salaries for the Company's Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.4 
 2012 Annual Base Salaries 
  

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Prior Base Salary	 	  	2012 Base Salary	 
	 Douglas C. Bryant

President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	482,040	  	  	$	496,501	  
	 Robert J. Bujarski

Senior Vice President, Business Development and General Counsel
	  	$	311,472	  	  	$	320,816	  
	 Scot M. McLeod

Senior Vice President, Operations
	  	$	276,841	  	  	$	285,146	  
	 Mark Smits

Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, North America
	  	$	285,000	  	  	$	290,700	* 
	 Timothy T. Stenzel

Chief Scientific Officer
	  	$	299,421	  	  	$	308,404	  
	 Randall Steward

Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	300,000	  	  	$	303,000	* 
	 John D. Tamerius

Senior Vice President, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs
	  	$	281,726	  	  	$	290,178	  

  

	*	Prorated salary increase for those hired by the Company in calendar year 2011.