alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

STATE OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OFCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

 

Nathaniel Energy Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

 

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Director of Nathaniel Energy Corporation resolution were dully adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows: RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered “4” so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows: THE AMOUNT OF THE TOTAL AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK OF THIS CORPORATION IS DIVIDED INTO 75,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AT $.001 PAR VALUE AND 2,000,000 OF PREFERRED STOCK AT $.001 PAR VALUE.

 

SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was dully called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares a required by statue were voted in favor of the amendment.

 

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by reason of said amendment.

 

FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by reason of said amendment.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Said Nathaniel Energy Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by Stan Abrams, an Authorized Officer, This 24th day of April, 2002.

 
| BY:    |   | /s/ Stan Abrams     |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| NAME:  |   | Stan Abrams         |
| Title: |   | President/Directors |

 

----
RE: Case #

TRUSTEE’S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION (Pre 341)

The Trustee reviewed this case for the meeting of creditors and found the following deficiencies from the Trustee’s letter requesting 

documents and thus objects as follows: Reviewed documents received prior to: 

Tax returns: Corporate Tax Returns: 

 Plan form completed incorrectly

Plan does not fund properly 

Calculation errors Missing months/amounts Inconsistent terms 

Attorney fee itemization or Fee Application needed (see court guideline 6) 

Other provisions: 100% Lawsuit Gambling MMM 

 Lien Avoidance motion not filed 

Reaffirm, redeem or surrender Sch D or G creditor: 

MMM Motion not filed 

Priority debt on Schedule E not in plan: 

Creditor in Plan is not listed in Schedules or has not filed a POC:

Creditor paid through the Plan has not filed a POC: 

Object or Conform to Proof of Claim: Miami-Dade County Tax Certificate (DE# ) Dept of Revenue 

 IRS

OTHER PLAN ISSUES:

Real Estate FMV and Payoff: 

Non-Homestead Information Sheet: 

Vehicles FMV (NADA/Carmax), Reg and Payoff: 

Other: 

Bank Account Statements 3 months pre-petition 

Copy of check(s) and/or explanation: 

Explanation of withdrawal(s): 

Domestic Support Obligation form complete with info: name, address and phone 

Wage deduction order or Motion to waive 

 Profit/loss Balance Sheet 

Business Bank statements and checks 3 months pre-petition 

Trustee reserves the right to raise additional objects until all requested documents are timely provided. This deficiency is limited to 

missing documents only. The Trustee will file a Notice of Deficiency with additional document requested and legal issues raised after the 

341 - meeting of creditors. I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s 

attorney or by U.S. First Class pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027

*DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED OR FILED AND ISSUES ADDRESSED AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO EACH

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL*

 LF 1 LF 67

Life Insurance Policy

Ricardo Hernandez 20-14645 AJC 5/27/20 ✔ SS card Missing 2016(B) ✔ ✔ IVL Valuation motion not filed ✔ 06' VOLVO ✔ #150 #155 $1300 ✔ 2/26 & 4/6 $1000 ✔ ✔ ✔

Affidavit of support LF 90 LF 10 BDQ & attachments 401K/Retirement/Pension Annuity✔ Missing signed copy of the Attorney's Declaration

Case 20-14645-AJC Doc 20 Filed 05/27/20 Page 1 of 1
Peppe K. PARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
BANK ONE, INDIANA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Annual Officer's Certificate of the Servicer Pursuant to
Section 3.10 of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement

         The undersigned,  duly authorized representatives of Bank One, Indiana,
National  Association,  as master servicer (the "Master Servicer"),  pursuant to
Section  3.10 of the Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of June 1, 1999
(the  "Agreement")  between Banc One  Financial  Services,  Inc., as seller (the
"Seller"),  Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor (the  "Depositor"),  the
Master Servicer and Norwest Bank  Minnesota,  National  Association,  as trustee
(the "Trustee"), do hereby certify as follows:

         (1) All terms used herein that are defined in the Agreement  shall have
the meanings provided in the Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

         (2) The  undersigned  are officers of the Master  Servicer who are duly
authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.

         (3) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period
from June 1, 1999 to  December  31,  1999 (the  "Servicing  Period")  and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under our supervision.

         (4) Based on such review,  the Master  Servicer has, to the best of our
knowledge,  fulfilled  all of  its  material  obligations  under  the  Agreement
throughout the Servicing Period except as set forth in paragraph (5) below.

         (5)  The  following  is a brief  description  of  each  default  in the
fulfillment of the Master Servicer's obligations under the Agreement known to us
to have been made by the Master Servicer during the Servicing Period, which sets
forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default and (ii) the current  status
of each such default: "None".

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Master Servicer has caused this Certificate to
be executed by the undersigned duly authorized officers as of December 31, 1999.

Bank One, Indiana, National Association,
as Master Servicer



By:
Name: Tracie Klein
Title: Vice President

By:
Name: Kim D. Greaves
Title: Senior Vice President
Case 19-20404-RAM Doc 32 Filed 10/17/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-20404-RAM Doc 32 Filed 10/17/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-20404-RAM Doc 32 Filed 10/17/19 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syscan Imaging, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the quarter ended March 31 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Hawkins, Chief Operating Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                            /s/ William Hawkins
Date:  June 17, 2005        --------------------------------------------------
                            William Hawkins, Acting Chief Financial Officer,
                            Chief Operating Officer and Secretary


         This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 203 (Friday, October 18, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11018]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 203/Friday, October 18, 1995/
Corrections

[[Page 54490]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-9-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

Correction

    In notice document 96-25856 appearing on page 52930 in the issue of 
Wednesday, October 9, 1996, the docket line should read as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Review of rare earth element concentrations in oil shales of the Eocene Green River Formation      

      February 8, 2012    

Concentrations of the lanthanide series or rare earth elements and yttrium were determined for lacustrine oil shale samples from the Eocene Green River Formation in the Piceance Basin of Colorado and the Uinta Basin of Utah. Unprocessed oil shale, post-pyrolysis (spent) shale, and leached shale samples were examined to determine if oil-shale processing to generate oil or the remediation of retorted shale affects rare earth element concentrations. Results for unprocessed Green River oil shale samples were compared to data published in the literature on reference materials, such as chondritic meteorites, the North American shale composite, marine oil shale samples from two sites in northern Tibet, and mined rare earth element ores from the United States and China. The Green River oil shales had lower rare earth element concentrations (66.3 to 141.3 micrograms per gram, μg g-1) than are typical of material in the upper crust (approximately 170 μg g-1) and were also lower in rare earth elements relative to the North American shale composite (approximately 165 μg g-1). Adjusting for dilution of rare earth elements by organic matter does not account for the total difference between the oil shales and other crustal rocks. Europium anomalies for Green River oil shales from the Piceance Basin were slightly lower than those reported for the North American shale composite and upper crust. When compared to ores currently mined for rare earth elements, the concentrations in Green River oil shales are several orders of magnitude lower. Retorting Green River oil shales led to a slight enrichment of rare earth elements due to removal of organic matter. When concentrations in spent and leached samples were normalized to an original rock basis, concentrations were comparable to those of the raw shale, indicating that rare earth elements are conserved in processed oil shales.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Justin Birdwell

##### Research Engineer and Geochemist

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jbirdwell@usgs.gov

303-236-1534

## Related Content

#### Justin Birdwell

##### Research Engineer and Geochemist

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jbirdwell@usgs.gov

303-236-1534

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Central Energy Resources Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBldg. 25Denver, CO80225United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Green River Formation
                  - Utah;Colorado;Wyoming
                  - Utah
                  - Colorado
                  - Wyoming

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80313]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner

24 CFR Part 890

[Docket No. R-95-1766; FR-3337-I-01]

RIN 2502-AF87


Supportive Housing for Persons With Disabilities; Management

Correction

    In rule document 95-4889 beginning on page 11836 in the issue of 
Thursday, March 2, 1995 make the following correction:
    On page 11836, in the first column, under DATES:, in the first 
line, ``April 13, 1995.'' should read ``April 3, 1995.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# L_2004299EN.01001301.xml

| 24.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 299/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 299/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1667/2004

of 23 September 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 6th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 20043rd on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 20043rd on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 6th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 46,263 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23.

2

---
EXHIBIT 99.2



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Principal Officers:  Harry Jung, P. Eng. President, C.E.O.
Dana B. Laustsen, P. Eng.
Executive V.P., C.O.O.
Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.
Executive V.P. 
Officers / Vice Presidents:  Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng. Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.
Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.
Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng. Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng. Mark Jobin, P. Geol.
John E. Keith, P. Eng. John H. Stilling, P.
Eng. Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng.
James H. Willmon, P. Eng.

CONSENT OF GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.



|TO: | Pengrowth Energy Corporation
|--- | ----------------------------

2100, 222-3 Avenue SW

Calgary, Alberta T2P OB4

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and report evaluating Pengrowth Energy Corporations petroleum and natural gas reserves as of
December 31, 2010 and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Pengrowth Energy Corporation and all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference
in: (i) Pengrowth Energy Corporations Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 and (ii) the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File No. 333-171672) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-171682) filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended as applicable.



Yours truly, 
GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.LOGODoug R. Sutton, P. Eng.
Executive Vice-President


Calgary, Alberta

March 8, 2011





4100, 400  3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2        (403) 266-9500        Fax (403) 262-1855        GLJPC.com
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 53996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-41016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-ACE-9]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Mosby, MO

Correction

    In rule document 96-25127, beginning on page 51361, in the issue of 
Wednesday, October 2, 1996, make the following correction.
    On page 51362, in the second column, in the ACE MO E5 Mosby, MO 
[New] entry, in the last paragraph, ``mile radius of'' should read 
``mile radius to''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4712 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 

for an option under the Secure Mail Initiative under 

which a person to whom a document is sent under that 

initiative may require that the United States Postal Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 

deliver the document, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4712 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the De3 partment of Homeland Security Secure Mail Initiative 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT UNDER 

6 THE SECURE MAIL INITIATIVE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning not later than 1 year 

8 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

9 of Homeland Security shall provide for an option under 

10 the Secure Mail Initiative (or any successor program) 

11 under which a person to whom a document is sent under 

12 that initiative may require that the United States Postal 

13 Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 

14 deliver the document. 

15 (b) FEE.—The Secretary shall require the payment 

16 of a fee from a person requiring a signature under sub17 section (a). Such fee may be set at a level that will ensure 

18 recovery of the full costs of providing all such services. 

19 Such fee may also be set at a level that will recover any 

20 additional costs associated with the administration of the 

21 fees collected. 

22 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

23 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

24 of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall sub25 mit to Congress a report which includes— 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4712 RFS

1 (1) the implementation of the requirements 

2 under section 2; 

3 (2) the fee imposed under section 2(b); and 

4 (3) the number of times during the previous 

5 year that a person required a signature under sec6 tion 2(a). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifiable long-term monitoring on parks and nature preserves      

      June 1, 2013    

Herpetofauna have declined globally, and monitoring is a useful approach to document local and long-term changes. However, monitoring efforts often fail to account for detectability or follow standardized protocols. We performed a case study at Hemlock Bluffs Nature Preserve in Cary, NC to model occupancy of focal species and demonstrate a replicable long-term protocol useful to parks and nature preserves. From March 2010 to 2011, we documented occupancy of Ambystoma opacum(Marbled Salamander), Plethodon cinereus (Red-backed Salamander), Carphophis amoenus (Eastern Worm Snake), and Diadophis punctatus (Ringneck Snake) at coverboard sites and estimated breeding female Ambystoma maculatum (Spotted Salamander) abundance via dependent double-observer egg-mass counts in ephemeral pools. Temperature influenced detection of both Marbled and Red-backed Salamanders. Based on egg-mass data, we estimated Spotted Salamander abundance to be between 21 and 44 breeding females. We detected 43 of 53 previously documented herpetofauna species. Our approach demonstrates a monitoring protocol that accounts for factors that influence species detection and is replicable by parks or nature preserves with limited resources.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Hemlock Bluffs Nature Preserve
                  - North Carolina

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40314]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------