alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands, except ratio) 2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Earnings:Pretax income
    
    $
    56,051
    
    
    $
    67,922
    
    
    $
    32,824
    
    
    $
    (9,093
    )
    
    $
    24,915Interest
    
    
    34,224
    
    
    
    30,720
    
    
    
    29,200
    
    
    
    37,887
    
    
    
    37,523Interest in leases
    
    
    2,434
    
    
    
    2,226
    
    
    
    2,002
    
    
    
    2,012
    
    
    
    1,719Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    471
    
    
    
    431
    
    
    
    434
    
    
    
    409
    
    
    
    338$
    93,180
    
    
    $
    101,299
    
    
    $
    64,460
    
    
    $
    31,215
    
    
    $
    64,495Fixed charges:Interest
    
    $
    34,224
    
    
    $
    30,720
    
    
    $
    29,200
    
    
    $
    37,887
    
    
    $
    37,523Capitalized interest
    
    
    480
    
    
    
    271
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    513
    
    
    
    895Interest in leases
    
    
    2,434
    
    
    
    2,226
    
    
    
    2,002
    
    
    
    2,012
    
    
    
    1,719Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    471
    
    
    
    431
    
    
    
    434
    
    
    
    409
    
    
    
    338$
    37,609
    
    
    $
    33,648
    
    
    $
    31,643
    
    
    $
    40,821
    
    
    $
    40,475Ratio:
    
    
    2.5x
    
    
    
    3.0x
    
    
    
    2.0x
    
    
    
    0.8x
    
    
    
    1.6x
 76
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Relations between atmospheric circulation and mass balance of South Cascade Glacier, Washington, USA      

      January 1, 1995    

The yearly net mass balance of South Cascade Glacier, Washington, has decreased since the mid-1970s. Results show that the decrease is primarily caused by a significant decrease in the winter mass balance. The decrease in winter mass balance is caused, in part, by changes in winter mean atmospheric circulation that began during the mid-1970s. Approximately 60% of the variability in winter mass balance can be explained by variations in winter mean 700-mb heights over western Canada. Since the mid-1970s, there has been an increase in winter mean 700-mb heights over western Canada and the northern western contiguous United States and a decrease in winter mean 700-mb heights in the eastern North Pacific Ocean centered near the Aleutian Islands. These changes in atmospheric circulation indicate a decrease in the movement of storms and moisture from the Pacific Ocean into the western contiguous United States. In addition, the increase in winter mean 700-mb heights over western Canada and the northern western contiguous United States indicates an increase in subsidence, which results in a warming and drying of the air that further reduces precipitation and also increases the ratio of rain to snow during the cold season. These factors contribute to below-average winter mass balances.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Water

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Mineral commodity summaries 2018      

      January 31, 2018    

This report is the earliest Government publication to furnish estimates covering 2017 nonfuel mineral industry data. Data sheets contain information on the domestic industry structure, Government programs, tariffs, and 5-year salient statistics for more than 90 individual minerals and materials.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               National Minerals Information Center          

988 National Center12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

nmicrecordsmgt@usgs.gov

703-648-4995

### Explore Search

                  - Minerals

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20322]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 87 Filed 10/27/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 87 Filed 10/27/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 87 Filed 10/27/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 87 Filed 10/27/21 Page 4 of 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Probability of one or more M ≥7 earthquakes in southern California in 30 years      

      January 1, 1994    

Eight earthquakes of magnitude greater than or equal to seven have occurred in southern California in the past 200 years. If one assumes that such events are the product of a Poisson process, the probability of one or more earthquakes of magnitude seven or larger in southern California within any 30 year interval is 67% ± 23% (95% confidence interval). Because five of the eight M ≥ 7 earthquakes in southern California in the last 200 years occurred off of the San Andreas fault system, the probability of one or more M ≥ 7 earthquakes in southern California but not on the San Andreas fault system occurring within 30 years is 52% ± 27% (95% confidence interval).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Southern California

View All **
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                  THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S. 1350

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Knology, Inc. (the "Company") that this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this "Amended Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in this Amended Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 29, 2002                            /s/ Rodger L. Johnson
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Rodger L. Johnson
                                                   President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer

Dated: October 29, 2002                            /s/ Robert K. Mills
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Robert K. Mills
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Protective pumping to reduce aquifer pollution, Glynn County, Georgia      

      September 1, 1971    

Water-level declines in the principal artesian aquifer have created a head imbalance between the aquifer and an underlying brackish-water zone containing up to 4,550 mg/1 chloride. The brackish-water zone leaks brackish water into the aquifer through several breaks in a confining unit.

A relief well tapping the brackish-water zone was drilled near a suspected break and pumped at about 3,000 gpm to lower the potential in the zone and bring it into hydrostatic equilibrium with the aquifer. The pumping apparently succeeded in decreasing the rate of brackish-water leakage into the aquifer. Successive samples of water from a well tapping the aquifer and downgradient from the relief well showed a decrease in the chloride content. Several more relief wells may be necessary to ultimately control chloride contamination of the aquifer.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Georgia

View All **
4129-N-3523

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE:

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. 

 DEBTOR

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 19-24331-PDR

NOTICE OF ADDRESS CHANGE

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that 

the notice address and payment address for the below mentioned Creditor has changed. Please update the case and claims 

register with the new information outlined below.

The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a 

The Bank of New York, successor in 

interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, 

N.A. as Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset 

Backed Securities Trust 2006-SD2, 

Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-

SD2

c/o Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC 4-1 9424

Creditor Name Court Claim # Last Four Digits of Acct.#

Name and Address where notices should be sent:

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

6200 S. Quebec Street

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Phone: (800) 315-4757

Name and Address where payments should be sent:

Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

6200 S. Quebec Street

Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Phone: (800) 315-4757

Dated: 10/30/2020

Respectfully submitted,

Bonial & Associates, P.C. 

/s/ Natalie Lea

Natalie Lea

14841 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300

Dallas, Texas 75254

(972) 643-6600

(972) 643-6698 (Telecopier)

E-mail: POCInquiries@BonialPC.com

Authorized Agent for Creditor

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 90 Filed 10/31/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 27, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10827]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 27, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 44119]]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 51

[FRL-5543-7]
RIN 2060-AE19


I/M Program Requirement-On-Board Diagnostic Checks

Correction

    In rule document 96-19409 beginning on page 40940 in the issue of 
Tuesday, August 6, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 51.372  [Corrected]

    On page 40946, in the first column, in Sec. 51.372(b)(3), in the 
last line, ``August 6, 1996'' should read ``August 6, 1998''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
ADDENDUM TO TWELFTH AMENDED PLAN

On the claim of Townhouses at Jacaranda Condo Association, Inc., the regular maintenance

payment was $359.60/month, months 1-20 and $595.00/month, months 21-23 with arrearages of 

$2,529.24 ($8,977.00 - $6447.76 paid). The special assessments were $300.00/month, months 1-

13 and $350.00/month, months 14-23 with arrearages of $7,400.00. For months 24-25 the 

regular maintenance payment was $595.00/month, and the special assessment was 

$350.00/month Beginning month 26 the monthly maintenance payment will be $632.00/month 

and the special assessment will be $350.00/month, for a total of $982.00

Current payments: Regular maintenance payment: $632.00

 Special assessment payment: $350.00

 Total payment: $982.00

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 210-1 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 1 Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 225-1 Filed 05/24/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 30157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60607]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 130

[Docket No. 92-174-1]
RIN 0579-AA67


Import/Export User Fees

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-12999 beginning on page 27913 in the 
issue of Friday, May 26, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 130.7  [Corrected]

    On page 27921, in Sec. 130.7(a), in the third column, in the table, 
under the ``User fee'' column, in the 7th line, ``0.50 per head'' 
should read ``0.25 per head'' and in the 13th line, ``0.025 per head'' 
should read ``0.25 per head''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30597

Summary Calendar

MIDSOUTH BANK, N.A., 

Plaintiff–Appellee

v.

ALFRED MCZEAL, SR., 

Defendant/Third Party

Plaintiff–Appellant

JAY ANGELLE,

Third Party Defendant–Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:10-CV-1560

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff–Appellee MidSouth Bank (“MidSouth”) filed a petition for

executory process pursuant to Louisiana Revised Statutes § 9:5555 in the 14th

Judicial District Court, Calcasieu Parish, against Defendant–Appellant

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 28, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30597 Document: 00511770004 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/28/2012
No. 11-30597

AlfredMcZeal Sr., seeking to enforce a promissory note and mortgage executed

by McZeal. McZeal removed that suit to the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana. MidSouth sought remand to state court and an

award of sanctions for improper removal. The district court granted MidSouth’s

motion to remand after finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the

suit. The district court also granted MidSouth’s request for removal sanctions

under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) after finding that McZeal lacked an objectively

reasonable basis for removal. McZeal appealed. 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), “Congress has severely circumscribed the

power of federal appellate courts to review remand orders.” Schexnayder v.

Entergy La., Inc., 394 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir. 2004). Section 1447(d) provides

that “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed

is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). “Specifically,

this Court lacks jurisdiction under § 1447 if the district court based its remand

order on either a lack of subject matter jurisdiction or a defect in removal

procedure.” Schexnayder, 394 F.3d at 283 (citing Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins.

Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711–12 (1996) and 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). Here, the district

court specifically stated it was remanding due to its lack of subject-matter

jurisdiction and therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain McZeal’s

appeal. Accordingly, McZeal’s appeal is DISMISSED.

2

Case: 11-30597 Document: 00511770004 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/28/2012
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00357-CV

IN RE A PURPORTED LIEN OR CLAIM 

AGAINST HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-18394

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Appellant is indigent; no costs are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED July 22, 2015.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Quest Software, Inc.
Irvine, California

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-82784, 333-38002, 333-49668, 333-91429, and 333-96183 on Form S-8;
Registration Statement No. 333-46648 on Form S-3; and Registration Statement
No. 333-63596 on Form S-4 of Quest Software, Inc. of our report dated January
29, 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quest Software, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

     Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned
report also included the financial statement schedule of Quest Software, Inc.
and subsidiaries, listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Costa Mesa, California
March 29, 2002
June 16, 2014

The Honorable Gina McCarthy, Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA West (Air Docket), Room 3334

1301 Constitution Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20004

Submitted via email to oilandgas.whitepapers@epa.gov

RE: Comments of the Independent Oil and Gas Association of West Virginia on

White Papers on Methane and VOC Emissions in the Oil and Natural Gas Sector 

per the Climate Action Plan Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions

Dear Administrator McCarthy:

The Independent Oil and Gas Association of West Virginia, Inc. (“IOGA-WV”) 

respectfully submits the following comments on the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency’s (“EPA”) White Papers on Methane and VOC Emissions (“White Papers”) which were 

released for external peer review on April 15, 2014. The White Papers focus on technical issues 

relating to potentially significant sources of emissions in the oil and natural gas sector. While 

there is not a formal EPA docket and the release of the White Papers for “comment” does not 

constitute formal rulemaking pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, EPA requested input 

from the public, including “technical information and data,” by June 16, 2014. IOGA-WV is a 

statewide non-profit trade association representing companies engaged in the exploration, 

production and development of natural gas and oil resources in West Virginia, and the 

companies and individuals who support these activities. 

IOGA-WV incorporates by reference the comments of the Independent Petroleum 

Association of America and Western Energy Alliance on these White Papers. In particular, 

IOGA-WV would like to emphasize EPA’s failure to differentiate between conventional

operations and “unconventional” operations. As with EPA’s approach to Subpart OOOO, there 

is no attempt to recognize differences associated with well type or geographical region/basin. 
Ms. Gina McCarthy

June 16, 2014

Page 2

This is most apparent in the context of a cost-benefit analysis. EPA’s charge questions are 

primarily focused on national averages. National averages simply do not work and are 

inappropriate for operations in the Appalachian region. Averages – in terms of cost and 

environmental impact – predominated by large, hydraulically fractured wells, are not appropriate 

for the majority of operations in West Virginia. As discussed in the comments from Independent 

Petroleum Association of America and Western Energy Alliance, these White Papers seem 

rushed and premature. IOGA of WV encourages EPA to take the time necessary to understand 

the differences between the types of wells and where those wells are located. One size does not 

fit all. 

IOGA-WV appreciates the opportunity to provide comment on the EPA/Adminstration’s 

White Papers. We would gladly entertain any comments or questions on these issues.

Sincerely,

Charlie Burd

Executive Director

Independent Oil & Gas Association

of West Virginia, Inc.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Reconnaissance of the quality of surface water in the Weber River basin, Utah      

      January 1, 1983    

View Document

This report on the reconnaissance of surface-water quality in the Weber River basin was prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights. The purposes of the reconnaissance were: (1) To obtain information on the general inorganic chemical characteristics of the surface water throughout the Weber River basin and, (2) to determine some of the effects of the natural environment and of present water use on these chemical characteristics.

The reconnaissance was limited in scope and did not include intensive study of the effects of municipal sewage, irrigation, industry, or mining on water quality. The principal objective was to define the general water-quality characteristics of streams in the basin. A secondary objective was to define specific problem areas or stream reaches.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Weber River Basin
                  - Utah

View All **
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of L.E., a child, * From the 220 th District Court

of Comanche County

Trial Court No. FM15517

.

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 0 84

- C V * August 15 , 201 9

* Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the order of the trial court is reversed insofar as it ordered the mother and the

father to pay child support, and judgment is rendered striking paragraphs 14.1,

14. [ 2 ] , and 14. [ 3 ] from the trial court’s order. In all other respects, we affirm

the trial court’s order of termination.
**Exhibit 21**

 

**List of Subsidiaries**

 
| **Subsidiary**                                  | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of Organization or  Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |       |                                                |
| LaBranche & Co. LLC                         |       | New York                                            |
| LaBranche Financial Services, Inc.              |       | New York                                            |
| LaBranche Structured Holdings, Inc.             |       | Delaware                                            |
| LaBranche Structured Products LLC               |       | New York                                            |
| LaBranche Structured Products Specialists, LLC  |       | New York                                            |
| LABDR Services, Inc.                            |       | New York                                            |
| LaBranche & Co. B.V.                        |       | Netherlands                                         |
| LaBranche Structured Products Europe Limited    |       | United Kingdom                                      |
| LaBranche Structured Products Hong Kong Limited |       | Hong Kong                                           |

 

1

----
exhibit10-5.htm





 



NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)


Previous Edition Unusable Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53