alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. (the Company) for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig M. Waggy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                      
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/  CRAIG M. WAGGY    
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Craig M. Waggy         
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

Dated:August 14,
2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to OpenTV Corp. and will be retained by OpenTV Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50210]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Soil genesis on the island of Bermuda in the Quaternary: the importance of African dust transport and deposition      

      September 21, 2012    

The origin of terra rossa, red or reddish-brown, clay-rich soils overlying high-purity carbonate substrates, has intrigued geologists and pedologists for decades. Terra rossa soils can form from accumulation of insoluble residues during dissolution of the host limestones, addition of volcanic ash, or addition of externally derived, long-range-transported (LRT) aeolian particles. We studied soils and paleosols on high-purity, carbonate aeolianites of Quaternary age on Bermuda, where terra rossa origins have been debated for more than a century. Potential soil parent materials on this island include sand-sized fragments of local volcanic bedrock, the LRT, fine-grained (<20 μm) component of distal loess from the lower Mississippi River Valley, and LRT dust from Africa. These parent materials can be characterized geochemically using trace elements that are immobile in the soil-forming environment. Results indicate that local volcanic bedrock on Bermuda has Sc-Th-La, Cr-Ta-Nd, and Eu/Eu*, LaN/YbN, GdN/YbN that can be distinguished from African dust and lower Mississippi River valley loess. Bermuda soils have Sc-Th-La, Cr-Ta-Nd, and Eu/Eu*, LaN/YbN, GdN/YbN that indicate derivation from a combination of LRT dust from Africa and local volcanic bedrock. Our results indicate that soils on islands in a very broad latitudinal belt of the western Atlantic margin have been influenced by African LRT dust inputs over much of the past –500 ka.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Daniel Muhs

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dmuhs@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

#### Jim Budahn

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

jbudahn@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

## Related Content

#### Daniel Muhs

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dmuhs@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

#### Jim Budahn

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

jbudahn@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - bermuda

View All **
2012 Executive Officer Incentive Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Majesco Entertainment Company 
 2012 Executive Officer Incentive Bonus
Program 
 The 2012 incentive bonus program of Majesco Entertainment Company (the “Company”) applies to the Company’s
executive officers and other management. The program is comprised of two components, a funding component and an allocation component. The funding component is the basis on which the dollar amount of the bonus pool to be allocated among all
participants is calculated and is based on the achievement by the Company of financial and operational goals (the “Goals”). The allocation component is the basis on which the actual bonus amount will be paid to each participant.

 If the Company meets all of the Goals set forth below, the bonus pool for the executive officers will be $488,000 (the “Bonus
Target”). The Bonus Target is determined as follows: 
 GOALS 
 The financial goal accounts for 75% of the Bonus Target, and is determined by a measure of net income as adjusted for certain non-operational items. 

The purpose of the operational goals (the “Operational Goals”) is to provide incentives for activities important to the Company’s
long-term value, outside of immediate financial impact. The Operational Goals account for 25% of the Bonus Target, and address the following areas: 
  

	 	•	 	 Digital Platforms 



	 	•	 	 Franchise Creation 



ALLOCATION 
 The Bonus Target will be
allocated pro rata among the participants based on their target bonus amounts set forth below. If any participant is not entitled to a payment, their pro rata portion will not be allocated to the other participants. 

 

					
	 Name
	 	 Position
	 	 Target Bonus

	Jesse Sutton	 	Chief Executive Officer	 	100% of annual salary, or $363,000
	Michael Vesey	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	50% of annual salary, or $125,000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                     Ending
Class          Interest        Principal           Losses            Balance
<S>              <C>             <C>                 <C>                <C>
A1            2100046.47       3332189.61                0       416677103.58
A10          11212739.72       9657141.48                0      1983718809.13
A11            249386.54       -249386.54                0        44584772.97
A12            842554.98                0                0          144438000
A13                    0                0                0            6636000
A14            169560.29       8181019.78                0        24808958.99
A15             64118.72       2121005.15                0         6431952.42
A16            498073.47        500089.79                0        89716993.99
A17              1253610                0                0          222864000
A18            633707.91       1016292.87                0       111642891.17
A19           1011340.16      -1011340.16                0       180805145.06
A2               1613160                0                0          322632000
A20                    0        777493.21                0       108294141.17
A21               9397.6                0                0                  0
A22             16427.39          2529.45                0         3030219.34
A3                 84930                0                0           16986000
A4            3077854.96       2404066.88                0       613166924.46
A5             128910.96       1952098.73                0        21846850.24
A6             651309.56        4782467.3                0       123606168.22
A7             311605.18        1839410.3                0        47540828.63
A8            1892839.48       -1319840.2                0       244982645.69
A9              22265.42           3423.5                0          4107115.4
ALR               182.13              100                0                  0
APO                    0          9250.99                0            7940272
AR                  0.54              100                0                  0
B1             620317.06         95462.97                0       114424608.79
B2             193009.87         29703.03                0        35602888.58
B3              96488.72         14849.02                0        17798452.96
B4              82704.62         12727.72                0        15255816.82
B5              46865.95          7212.38                0         8644962.85
B6              63434.39          9121.82           640.35        11701199.95


</TABLE>
Tommie MCCLENNEY, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-732

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Please don't misuse the museum: 'declines' may be statistical      

      August 7, 2014    

Detecting declines in populations at broad spatial scales takes enormous effort, and long-term data are often more sparse than is desired for estimating trends, identifying drivers for population changes, framing conservation decisions or taking management actions. Museum records and historic data can be available at large scales across multiple decades, and are therefore an attractive source of information on the comparative status of populations. However, changes in populations may be real (e.g., in response to environmental covariates) or resulting from variation in our ability to observe the true population response (also possibly related to environmental covariates). This is a (statistical) nuisance in understanding the true status of a population. Evaluating statistical hypotheses alongside more interesting ecological ones is important in the appropriate use of museum data. Two statistical considerations are generally applicable to use of museum records: first without initial random sampling, comparison with contemporary results cannot provide inference to the entire range of a species, and second the availability of only some individuals in a population may respond to environmental changes. Changes in the availability of individuals may reduce the proportion of the population that is present and able to be counted on a given survey event, resulting in an apparent decline even when population size is stable.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
P.G.C., the Father, Appellant, v. V.C., the Mother, Appellee.

No. 4D18-0618

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2004190EN.01001201.xml

| 28.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1031/2004

of 27 May 2004

determining the allocation of export licences for certain milk products to be exported to the Dominican Republic under the quota referred to in Article 20a of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 of 26 January 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products (2), and in particular Article 20a(11) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities covered by export licence applications for the products referred to in Article 20a(3) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 submitted for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 shall be multiplied by the following allocation coefficients:

| — | 0,659922 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, |
| --- | --- |

—

0,659922 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999,

| — | 0,296688 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999. |
| --- | --- |

—

0,296688 for applications submitted for the part of the quota referred to in Article 20a(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 597/2004 (OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 42).

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 7, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 32 and 64

[CC Docket No. 96-150, FCC 96-309]


Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting 
Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996

Correction

    In proposed rule document 96-19563 beginning on page 40161 in the 
issue of Thursday, August 1, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 40180, in the 2d column, in the 1st paragraph, in the 10th 
and 11th lines, ``[insert date 60 days after publication in the Federal 
Register.]'' should read ``September 30, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-257-CR

TAMARA MICHELLE SONATY	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Tamara Michelle Sonaty appeals the trial court’s adjudication of her guilt for delivery of marijuana to a minor.  We affirm.

	Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California,2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.  Appellant has also filed a pro se brief, in which she challenges the voluntariness of her original plea of guilty to the delivery of marijuana offense.

	Once an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record and essentially to rebrief the case for appellant to see if there is any arguable ground that may be raised on appellant’s behalf.3  Because this is an appeal from the trial court’s adjudication of appellant’s deferred adjudication community supervision, our independent review for potential error is limited to jurisdictional defects, potential errors not affecting the decision to adjudicate, and post-adjudication matters unrelated to appellant’s conviction.4  The trial court’s decision to adjudicate guilt is not appealable.5 

	Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel has correctly determined that there are no arguable grounds for relief.  There are no jurisdictional defects.  The indictment conferred jurisdiction on the trial court and provided appellant with sufficient notice to prepare a defense.6  In addition, the trial court had jurisdiction to adjudicate appellant’s guilt and sentence her, and the sentence is within the punishment range for the adjudicated offense.7 

	Appellant contends that her original guilty plea was involuntary because she was scared into accepting the plea bargain.  A defendant placed on deferred adjudication may not, after an adjudication of guilt, complain of issues relating to the original plea proceeding such as the voluntariness of a guilty plea.8  Therefore, we will not consider this complaint.

	Because there is no arguable ground that may be raised on appellant’s behalf in this appeal, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and HOLMAN, JJ. 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  June 15, 2006
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida, Miami Division

In re 7701 SW 120th Street LLC Case No. 20-16512-AJC

Debtor(s) Chapter 11

LIST OF EQUITY SECURITY HOLDERS

Following is the list of the Debtor's equity security holders which is prepared in accordance with rule 1007(a)(3) for filing in this Chapter 11 Case

Name and last known address or place of

business of holder

Security Class Number of Securities Kind of Interest

John Aaron

9620 NE 2nd Ave Ste 203

Miami Shores, FL 33138-2749

Member Units 100

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY ON BEHALF OF CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP

I, the Manager of the corporation named as the debtor in this case, declare under penalty of perjury that I have read

the foregoing List of Equity Security Holders and that it is true and correct to the best of my information and belief.

Date June 15, 2020 Signature /s/ John Aaron

John Aaron

Penalty for making a false statement of concealing property: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 and 3571.

Sheet 1 of 1 in List of Equity Security Holders

Software Copyright (c) 2020 CINGroup - www.cincompass.com 

Case 20-16512-AJC Doc 3 Filed 06/15/20 Page 1 of 1
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                August 14, 2007                                                                      |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| /s/ Bo                Liu                                                                             |   |   |   |
| Bo                Liu                                                                                      |   |   |   |
| Chairman,                Director, andChief                Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ David                Wang                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| David                Wang                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer (principal                financial officer and principal accounting                officer) |   |   |   |

----
# L_2004311EN.01002501.xml

| 8.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/25

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1746/2004

of 6 October 2004

repealing Regulation (EC) No 1502/2004 prohibiting fishing for plaice by vessels flying the flag of Belgium

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1502/2004 (2) prohibits fishing for plaice in the waters of ICES subarea VII f, g by vessels flying the flag of Belgium or registered in Belgium. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1502/2004 (2) prohibits fishing for plaice in the waters of ICES subarea VII f, g by vessels flying the flag of Belgium or registered in Belgium.

| (2) | Following a transfer of fishing opportunities, the quota available for Belgium is no longer exhausted. Consequently, fishing for plaice in the waters of ICES sub-area VII f, g by vessels flying the flag of Belgium or registered in Belgium should be authorised. Regulation (EC) No 1502/2004 should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following a transfer of fishing opportunities, the quota available for Belgium is no longer exhausted. Consequently, fishing for plaice in the waters of ICES sub-area VII f, g by vessels flying the flag of Belgium or registered in Belgium should be authorised. Regulation (EC) No 1502/2004 should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1502/2004 is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 October 2004.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST

Director-General for Fisheries

---

(1)  
  OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 275, 25.8.2004, p. 13.

2

---
Lawrence T. REID, Jr., Appellant, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF Margaret REID, Incapacitated Ward, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2025

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 1995 / Notices 22587

[FR Doc. 95–11239 Filed 5–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–C