alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel Generelli, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Baynon
         International Corporation;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this annual report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

         a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
                  that material information relating to the registrant is made
                  known to us by others within those entities, particularly
                  during the period in which this annual report is being
                  prepared;

         b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
                  controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
                  and

         c)       presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent functions):

         a)       all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
                  internal controls which could adversely affect the
                  registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
                  financial data and have identified for the registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
                  or other employees who have a significant role in the
                  registrant's internal controls.


Date: March 12, 2007


/s/ DANIEL GENERELLI
---------------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into between Group 1
Automotive, Inc. (“Employer”) and Earl J. Hesterberg (“Employee”), effective as of February 27,
2012 (the “Effective Date”).



RECITALS




WHEREAS, Employer and Employee previously entered into an employment agreement dated September
8, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, Section 6.11 of the Employment Agreement contemplates that Employer and Employee may
amend the Employment Agreement at any time, provided that such amendment is in writing and signed
by both Employer and Employee; and



WHEREAS, Employer and Employee have determined that it is mutually beneficial to both parties
to amend the Employment Agreement at this time to eliminate Section 3.5(iv) thereof, effective as
of the Effective Date.



AGREEMENT




For and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and obligations contained in the
Employment Agreement and herein, Employer and Employee agree as follows:



1. Effective as of the Effective Date, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting
the existing Section 3.5(iv) thereof and renumbering the existing Section 3.5(v) thereof as the new
Section 3.5(iv).



2. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain effective and unchanged by
this Amendment.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have duly executed this Amendment, which may be
executed in multiple originals, to be effective on the date first stated above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	DATE:
	 	February 27, 2012
	 	GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

	 	 	 
	 	


	 	 	 	 	By: /s/Max P. Watson, Jr.

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	 	 	Name:Max P. Watson

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	 	 	Title:Chairman, Compensation Committee

	 	 	 	 	 

	DATE:
	 	February 27, 2012
	 	/s/Earl J. Hesterberg

	 	 	 
	 	 

	 	 	 	 	EARL J. HESTERBERG
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Michael Schaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer,
Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  respectively  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


            /s/ Michael Schaffer             /s/ Lawrence Schaffer
            -----------------------          -----------------------
            Michael Schaffer,                Lawrence Schaffer,
            Chief Executive Officer          Chief Financial Officer
            May 19, 2005                     May 19, 2005
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mapping wetland burned area from Sentinel-2 across the southeastern United States and its contributions relative to Landsat 8 (2016-2019)      

      August 25, 2021    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

March 30, 2022

####                 Wetland burned area extent derived from Sentinel-2 across the southeastern U.S. (2016-2019)              

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

#### Melanie Vanderhoof

##### Research Geographer

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

mvanderhoof@usgs.gov

303-236-1411

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

#### Joshua Picotte, PhD

##### Biologist

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

jpicotte@usgs.gov

## Related Content

March 30, 2022

####                 Wetland burned area extent derived from Sentinel-2 across the southeastern U.S. (2016-2019)              

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

#### Melanie Vanderhoof

##### Research Geographer

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

mvanderhoof@usgs.gov

303-236-1411

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

#### Joshua Picotte, PhD

##### Biologist

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

jpicotte@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Florida
                  -  Montana
                  -  Oregon

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

29783

Vol. 62, No. 105

Monday, June 2, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Importation of Controlled Substances;

Notice of Application

Correction

In notice document 97–13088

appearing on page 27281 in the issue of

Monday, May 19, 1997, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 27281, in the first column,

in the subject heading and in the first

paragraph, in the nineth line,

‘‘important’’ should read ‘‘importation’’.

2. On the same page, in the second

column, in the third paragraph, in the

last line, ‘‘(30 days from publication)’’

should read ‘‘June 18, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 70-7001]

Amendment to Certificate of

Compliance GDP-1 for the U.S.

Enrichment Corporation, Paducah

Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah, KY

Correction

In notice document 97–13025

beginning on page 27282 in the issue of

Monday, May 19, 1997, make the

following correction:

On page 27283, in the first column, in

the Effective date section, ‘‘June 18,

1997’’ should read ‘‘30 days after

issuance of amendment.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Long-term and large-scale perspectives on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning      

      January 1, 2003    

In a growing body of literature from a variety of ecosystems is strong evidence that various components of biodiversity have significant impacts on ecosystem functioning. However, much of this evidence comes from short-term, small-scale experiments in which communities are synthesized from relatively small species pools and conditions are highly controlled. Extrapolation of the results of such experiments to longer time scales and larger spatial scales—those of whole ecosystems—is difficult because the experiments do not incorporate natural processes such as recruitment limitation and colonization of new species. We show how long-term study of planned and accidental changes in species richness and composition suggests that the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning will vary over time and space. More important, we also highlight areas of uncertainty that need to be addressed through coordinated cross-scale and cross-site research.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
COASTAL CONSTRUCTION GROUP OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. RUS MBR, LLC, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0062

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 19-26512-RAM Doc 59 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-26512-RAM Doc 59 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-26512-RAM Doc 59 Filed 06/02/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Proceedings of the XIIIth IAGA Workshop on Geomagnetic Observatory Instruments, Data Acquisition, and Processing      

      October 27, 2009    

The thirteenth biennial International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) Workshop on Geomagnetic Observatory Instruments, Data Acquisition and Processing was held in the United States for the first time on June 9-18, 2008. Hosted by the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Geomagnetism Program, the workshop's measurement session was held at the Boulder Observatory and the scientific session was held on the campus of the Colorado School of Mines in Golden, Colorado. More than 100 participants came from 36 countries and 6 continents.

Preparation for the workshop began when the USGS Geomagnetism Program agreed, at the close of the twelfth workshop in Belsk Poland in 2006, to host the next workshop. Working under the leadership of Alan Berarducci, who served as the chairman of the local organizing committee, and Tim White, who served as co-chairman, preparations began in 2007. The Boulder Observatory was extensively renovated and additional observation piers were installed. Meeting space on the Colorado School of Mines campus was arranged, and considerable planning was devoted to managing the many large and small issues that accompany an international meeting. Without the devoted efforts of both Alan and Tim, other Geomagnetism Program staff, and our partners at the Colorado School of Mines, the workshop simply would not have occurred. 

We express our thanks to Jill McCarthy, the USGS Central Region Geologic Hazards Team Chief Scientist; Carol A. Finn, the Group Leader of the USGS Geomagnetism Program; the USGS International Office; and Melody Francisco of the Office of Special Programs and Continuing Education of the Colorado School of Mines. We also thank the student employees that the Geomagnetism Program has had over the years and leading up to the time of the workshop. For preparation of the proceedings, thanks go to Eddie and Tim. And, finally, we thank our sponsors, the USGS, IAGA, and the Colorado School of Mines.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 249 (Thursday, December 26, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 68097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11226]



Federal Register/Vol. 61, No. 249/Thursday, December 26, 1996/
CorrectionsCorrections

[[Page 68097]]



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Irene C. Kelly, a/k/a Ayter Yalincak, a/k/a Imrag Yalincak; 
Revocation of Registration

Correction

    In notice document 96-30380 appearing on page 60729 in the issue of 
Friday, November 29, 1996, make the following corrections:
    On the same page, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in 
the first line, ``Accordinly'' should read ``Accordingly''.
    On the same page, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in 
the fourth line, ``823'' should read ``823 and 824''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Orlando ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 20, 2018

Orlando Alvarez, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Orlando Alvarez appeals the summary denial of his amended Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We reverse and remand the summary denial of Alvarez's first ground for relief, alleging that his trial counsel failed to depose the victim and other relevant witnesses. The ground, as pled, was facially insufficient but Alvarez was not put on notice of the defect. The postconviction court should have granted Alvarez leave to amend. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3) ; *Osorio v. State*, 233 So.3d 516, 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Should Alvarez amend this claim, if the postconviction court wants to summarily deny relief again, it must attach records that conclusively refute this ground for relief. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) ; *Castro v. State*, 240 So.3d 877, 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (indicating that statement of satisfaction with counsel alone is generally insufficient to conclusively refute claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call witness). In all other respects, we affirm the trial court's order.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. § 1350), Paul L. Berns, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Allos Therapeutics, Inc., and David C. Clark, the VicePresident, Finance of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), eachhereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                     TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Quarterly Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                     Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: July 28, 2010

 
|   | /s/ Paul L. Berns                            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul L. Berns                                |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer        |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|   |                                         |
|   |                                         |
|   | /s/ David C. Clark                           |
|   | David C. Clark                               |
|   | Vice President, Finance and Treasurer        |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed original of this written statement has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.  This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Qto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing.

 

----
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

11253

Vol. 62, No. 47

Tuesday, March 11, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Southeastern Power Administration

Intent To Formulate Revised Power

Marketing Policy Cumberland System

of Projects

Correction

In document 97–5258, beginning on

page 9762, in the issue of Tuesday,

March 4, 1997, make the following

correction:

On page 9762, in the third column, in

the EFFECTIVE DATE: entry, ‘‘April 3,

1997’’ should read ‘‘May 5, 1997.’’

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### Ruth Kedenberg et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Town of North Hempstead, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

October 11, 1973.

*Ira J. Raab*for plaintiffs. *Francis F. Doran*for defendant.

Albert A. Oppido, J.

This court disagrees with the movant’s interpretation of the effect of section 12-4.1 of the Nassau County Administrative Code (L. 1943, ch. 565, § 1) upon the provisions of subdivision 18 of section 140 of the Highway Law. *893The case of *Strauch*v. *Town of Oyster Bay*(263 App. Div. 833), upon which defendant relies, did not involve a State highway but, rather, a county road and the section of the. Administrative Code, which was held to prevail over the Highway Law provision was subdivision a of section 12-4.C (L. 1939, ch. 272, § 1), which explicitly gave the county *“*sole jurisdiction over county roads ”. The provisions of section 12-4.1 do not give the county such sole jurisdiction over sidewalks adjoining State highways in unincorporated areas and, furthermore,, the language of the section is permissive rather than mandatory. It has not been shown that the County of Nassau has exercised jurisdiction over the sidewalks involved in the instant action and, therefore, it would appear that defendant has the obligation to maintain it. Whether or not the defendant hasj in fact, maintained the sidewalk is a question of fact to be determined upon the trial.

Motion by defendant for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30328]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the report of China Yongxin Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Yongxin LiuYu
      Yongxin Liu
                      Chief
      Executive Officer
                      April
      15, 2009/s/
      Yongkui LiuYongkui
      Liu
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                      April
      15, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Dennis Crawley, Defendant.

City Court of Long Beach,

October 11, 1973.

*486
      *David J. Weinblatt, Corporation Counsel (Paul Coogan*of counsel), for plaintiff. *J. Richard MacMurray*for defendant.

Vincent A. Pikronb, J.

Defendant, by information, is charged with having violated chapter 6, article 1, section 6-105, and chapter 6, article 2, section 6-221 of the Municipal Code of the City of Long Beach. Both alleged offenses were to have occurred as a result of defendant’s physical presence at the Ocean Beach Park during the evening hours of July 9, 1973.

Defendant moves to dismiss the information by pointing out that prior posting was not given to the defendant and others in connection with the alleged unlawful presence of the defendant at the beach park beyond the evening hours of 8:00 p.m., and for defendant’s alleged imbibing of beer or other intoxicating beverage on a public beach.

The defendant does not attack the manner in which the ordinance was passed, to wit: pursuant to section 76 of the Charter, of the City of Long Beach, nor its continued validity, but rather the application of these ordinances against the defendant.

The Corporation Counsel argues, and logically so, that to require a municipality to provide signs and notices of every prohibition governing public places would necessarily require the posting of numerous signs which would, in effect, environmentally and esthetically diminish the public right-to quiet enjoyment of their city.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion, in all respects, is denied.