alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Marsh rabbit mortalities tie pythons to the precipitous decline of mammals in the Everglades      

      March 25, 2015    

To address the ongoing debate over the impact of invasive species on native terrestrial wildlife, we conducted a large-scale experiment to test the hypothesis that invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) were a cause of the precipitous decline of mammals in Everglades National Park (ENP). Evidence linking pythons to mammal declines has been indirect and there are reasons to question whether pythons, or any predator, could have caused the precipitous declines seen across a range of mammalian functional groups. Experimentally manipulating marsh rabbits, we found that pythons accounted for 77% of rabbit mortalities within 11 months of their translocation to ENP and that python predation appeared to preclude the persistence of rabbit populations in ENP. On control sites, outside of the park, no rabbits were killed by pythons and 71% of attributable marsh rabbit mortalities were classified as mammal predations. Burmese pythons pose a serious threat to the faunal communities and ecological functioning of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem, which will probably spread as python populations expand their range.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Margaret Hunter, Ph.D.

##### Research Geneticist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

mhunter@usgs.gov

352-264-3484

#### Kristen Hart, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

kristen_hart@usgs.gov

954-236-1067

## Related Content

#### Margaret Hunter, Ph.D.

##### Research Geneticist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

mhunter@usgs.gov

352-264-3484

#### Kristen Hart, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

kristen_hart@usgs.gov

954-236-1067

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States
                  - Everglades
                  - Florida

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

35601

Vol. 60, No. 131

Monday, July 10, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Consumer Service

National School Lunch, Special Milk,

and School Breakfast Programs;

National Average Payments/Maximum

Reimbursement Rates

Correction

In notice document 95–16272

beginning on page 34500, in the issue of

Monday, July, 3, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 34501, in the third column

under School Breakfast Program

Payments, in the fifth line, ‘‘69.45

cents’’ should read ‘‘69.75 cents’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 575

RIN 3206-AF86

Recruitment and Relocation Bonuses

and Retention Allowances

Correction

In final rule document 95–15713

beginning on page 33323 in the issue of

Wednesday, June 28, 1995, make the

following corrections:

§ 575.203 [Corrected]

On page 33326, in §575.203, under

the definition for Employee, in the next

to last line ‘‘community’’ should read

‘‘commuting’’.

§ 575.304 [Corrected]

On page 33327, in §575.304(a), in the

second column, in the second line ‘‘by’’

should read ‘‘for’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: January 26, 2017 5 21163

________________________________ In the Matter of RALPH OYAGUE, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLINTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: November 29, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ.

__________ Ralph Oyague, Huntington, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliott III, J.), entered March 31, 2015 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Respondent moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Petitioner opposed the motion by claiming that he submitted an administrative appeal and never received a response. Supreme Court granted the motion and dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals. Petitioner properly served the notice of appeal upon respondent (see CPLR 2103 [b] [2]), but the notice was apparently never filed with the Albany County Clerk due to it having been-2- 521163

mistakenly mailed to the Albany County Attorney (see CPLR 5515 [1]). In view of petitioner's pro se status and the absence of any allegation that the failure to file prejudiced respondent, we "grant an extension of time to enable [petitioner] to cure his mistake and, in the interest of justice and judicial economy, address the merits" (Carp v Marcus, 138 AD2d 775, 776 [1988] [internal citation omitted]; see CPLR 5520 [a]; M Entertainment, Inc. v Leydier, 13 NY3d 827, 828-829 [2009]; Gamble v Gamble, 23 AD2d 887, 887 [1965]). Upon the merits, we affirm. Respondent supported the motion to dismiss with an affidavit from the director of the office responsible for issuing final administrative determinations regarding tier III disciplinary hearing appeals. The director stated that he had reviewed the office's records and that petitioner had not submitted an administrative appeal regarding the determination at issue. The record accordingly reflects that petitioner failed to take an administrative appeal from the determination of guilt as required and, as a result, Supreme Court properly concluded that petitioner had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and dismissed the petition (see Matter of Tafari v Artus, 79 AD3d 1468, 1468-1469 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 709 [2011]; Matter of Fulton v Futia, 71 AD3d 1356, 1356 [2010]). Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur.-3- 521163

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs, upon the condition that petitioner file the notice of appeal with the Albany County Clerk within 30 days of the date of this Court's decision.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Case 19-01394-RBR Doc 2 Filed 08/28/19 Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jonathan S. Feldman (name), certify that service of this summons, a copy of the complaint, a copy of the 

Pretrial/Trial Order (DE 3), and a copy of the Order Establishing Uniform Mediation Procedures (DE 861, 

Main Case) was made 8/29/19 (date) by:

XX Mail Service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre−paid, addressed to:

Symon Sanak

264 Nutall Road

Riverside, IL 60546-1859

Robert Gorgijoski

953 High Meadow Drive, Apt.B

Crown Point, IN 46307-5296

RTST Express Inc.

c/o Symon Sanak, Registered 

Agent

2122 Shermann Road

Hammond, IN 46320

Personal Service: By leaving the process with defendant or with an officer or agent of 

defendant at:

Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at:

Certified Mail Service on an Insured Depository Institution: By sending the process by certified 

mail addressed to the following officer of the defendant at:

Publication: The defendant was served as follows: [Describe briefly]

State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of

, as follows: [Describe briefly]

If service was made by personal service, by residence service, or pursuant to state law, I further certify that 

I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 18 years of age and not a party to 

the matter concerning which service of process was made.

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: 8/29/19 Signature: /s/ Jonathan S. Feldm an

Print Name: Jonathan S. Feldman, Esq., for Plaintiff (12682)

Address: 200 S. Andrews Ave., Suite 600

City: Ft. Lauderdale State: FL Zip: 33301

Page 3 of 3

Case 19-01394-RAM Doc 4 Filed 08/29/19 Page 1 of 1
Richard Harrison MASON v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

2017-CT-00179-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 2, 2018 Closed: July 19, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of CoConnect, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Mark L. Baum, interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Mark L.
Baum


Mark L.
Baum


Interim
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





April 7,
2008
Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 1 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 2 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 3 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 4 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 5 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 6 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 7 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 8 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 9 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 10 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 11 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 12 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 13 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 14 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 15 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 16 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 17 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 18 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 19 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 20 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 21 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 22 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 23 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 24 of 25

Case 19-25436-EPK    Doc 1    Filed 11/15/19    Page 25 of 25
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                       AutoNation Financial Services Corp.

     The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of AutoNation Financial Services
Corp. (the "Servicer"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2001 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the "Sale and Servicing Agreement"), by and among
ANRC Auto Owner Trust 2001-A, AutoNation Receivables Corporation, the Servicer
and The Chase Manhattan Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as
Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:

     a. A review of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2002 through
     December 31, 2002 and of its performance of its obligations under the "Sale
     and Servicing Agreement" was made under my supervision; and

     b. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,

     (A) the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the "Sale and
     Servicing Agreement" throughout the period covered by this certificate

     and (B) that no default under this Agreement has occurred and is
     continuing.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
     13th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ David M. Jett
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: David M. Jett
                                        Title: Vice President - Finance, ANFS
# L_2005094EN.01003701.xml

| 13.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 94/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 94/37

---

STATEMENT BY THE COMMISSION

concerning Article 2 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights

(2005/295/EC)

Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (1) states in Article 2(1) that the Directive applies to any infringement of intellectual property rights as provided for by Community law and/or by the national law of the Member State concerned.

1

The Commission considers that at least the following intellectual property rights are covered by the scope of the Directive:

| — | copyright, |
| --- | --- |

—

copyright,

| — | rights related to copyright, |
| --- | --- |

—

rights related to copyright,

| — | sui generis right of a database maker, |
| --- | --- |

—

sui generis right of a database maker,

sui generis

| — | rights of the creator of the topographies of a semiconductor product, |
| --- | --- |

—

rights of the creator of the topographies of a semiconductor product,

| — | trademark rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

trademark rights,

| — | design rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

design rights,

| — | patent rights, including rights derived from supplementary protection certificates, |
| --- | --- |

—

patent rights, including rights derived from supplementary protection certificates,

| — | geographical indications, |
| --- | --- |

—

geographical indications,

| — | utility model rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

utility model rights,

| — | plant variety rights, |
| --- | --- |

—

plant variety rights,

| — | trade names, in so far as these are protected as exclusive property rights in the national law concerned. |
| --- | --- |

—

trade names, in so far as these are protected as exclusive property rights in the national law concerned.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 45. Directive as corrected and republished in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004. p. 16.

1

---
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.: 20-11487-RAM

Chapter 13

Rafael Gonzalez

Nitza M Gonzalez

 Debtor(s) /

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION 

TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority status 

of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify which 

claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. Upon the filing of this 

objection an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled on the date already scheduled 

for the confirmation hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the [trustee][debtor] 

objects to the following claim filed in this case:

Claim Amount of

No. Name of Claimant Claim 

17 Bank of America $143,388.30

Basis for Objection and Recommended Disposition

On or about March 27, 2020, Creditor filed a secured proof of claim in the amount of $143,388.30

and an arrearage in the amount of $1,907.22 for a mortgage on 10399 NW 128th Terrace Hialeah 

Gardens, FL 33018-6008 with an account number ending in 0010. The Debtors assert that they are 

current witht heir obligation to the Creditor and the Debtors’ plan calls for this claim to be paid 

outside the bankruptcy and directly to the Creditor. Debtors request the claim be allowed as filed,

but deemed to be current as stated above, with no distribution from the Chapter 13 Trustee.

Furthermore, the Debtors request that no attorney’s fees and costs be attributed to the Objection to 

Confirmation filed at ECF#26 since this claim is current and direct pay. 

I FURTHER CERTIFY that I have contacted opposing counsel in an attempt to resolve 

these issues without a hearing. The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice 

of hearing for this objection will be served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to 

the confirmation hearing date and that a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) 

must be filed with the court when the objection and notice of hearing are served.

DATED: June 1, 2020 Respectfully Submitted: 

Robert Sanchez, P.A.

355 West 49th Street

Hialeah, FL 33012

Fl. Bar No. 0442161

Telephone: (305) 687-8008

E-Mail: court@bankruptcyclinic.com

Case 20-11487-RAM Doc 44 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

I,  Michael Schaffer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Case Financial,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  company's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's  internal  control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have  indicated in this  quarterly  report  whether there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

/s/ Michael Schaffer
-----------------------
Michael Schaffer,
Chief Executive Officer
March 2, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10518]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 1995 / Notices 32179

[FR Doc. 95–15073 Filed 6–19–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–C
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary isostatic residual gravity map of the Tremonton 30' x 60' quadrangle, Box Elder and Cache Counties, Utah, and Franklin and Oneida Counties, Idaho      

      January 1, 2014    

View Document

A new isostatic residual gravity map of the Tremonton 30' x 60' quadrangle of Utah is based on compilation of preexisting data and new data collected by the Utah and U.S. Geological Surveys. Pronounced gravity lows occur over North Bay, northwest of Brigham City, and Malad and Blue Creek Valleys, indicating significant thickness of low-density Tertiary sedimentary rocks and deposits. Gravity highs coincide with exposures of dense pre-Cenozoic rocks in the Promontory, Clarkston, and Wellsville Mountains. The highest gravity values are located in southern Curlew Valley and may be produced in part by deeper crustal density variations or crustal thinning. Steep, linear gravity gradients coincide with Quaternary faults bounding the Wellsville and Clarkston Mountains. Steep gradients also coincide with the margins of the Promontory Mountains, Little Mountain, West Hills, and the eastern margin of the North Promontory Mountains and may define concealed basin-bounding faults.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Victoria Langenheim

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

zulanger@usgs.gov

650-439-2313

## Related Content

#### Victoria Langenheim

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

zulanger@usgs.gov

650-439-2313

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho
                  -  Utah

View All **