alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CGFD44 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 23, 2021

Robert A Mark

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−25829−RAM

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Janet Caridad Andrade

aka Janet Andrade, aka Janet C Andrade, aka Janet Caridad Andrade

Nunez

14321 SW 129th CT

Miami, FL 33186

SSN: xxx−xx−5997

ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO TRUSTEE'S REPORT OF

NON−COMPLIANCE BY DEBTOR WITH POST CONFIRMATION PLAN

 As provided under Local Rule 3070−1(C)(2)(c), a Report of Non−Compliance by Debtor with Plan

Payments has been filed by the trustee in this case indicating that the debtor was served by the trustee

with a notice of delinquency which established a deadline for the debtor to become current with plan

payments and that the debtor has failed to meet this deadline.

 Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

Page 1 of 2

Case 19-25829-RAM Doc 193 Filed 04/23/21 Page 1 of 2
1. This case is dismissed.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

3. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United

States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the

balance of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the

trustee shall be applied to this balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in

accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by

the court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all

unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

5. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with

the requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

6. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B)(1), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept

for filing any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior

order of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in

Installments and filing fees remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 19-25829-RAM Doc 193 Filed 04/23/21 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0548

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JOHN HENRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 12, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2021

06/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0548
Elias Thomas PRECIADO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1019

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 232 (Monday, December 2, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 63928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-21202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG96-96-000, et al.]


Termovalla S.C.A., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation 
Filings

Correction

    In notice document 96-29654 beginning on page 59092 in the issue of 
Wednesday, November 20, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 59093, in the second column, in the Docket numbers, in 
the second and third line, ``ER95-12-69-004'' should read ``ER95-1269-
004''.
    2. On the same page, in the third column, in the Docket numbers, in 
the third line, ``96-108-005'' should read ``ER96-108-005''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9971]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6597]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Dove/O'Keeffe: Circles of Influence''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Dove/O'Keeffe: Circles of Influence,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Sterling and 
Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, MA, from on or about June 
7, 2009, until on or about September 7, 2009, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 15, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-9971 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
m.tL Jtj k fL~.~:JA-Jr&oB~ 

-roe- J-/Jtk®! 12 #st\QS a~~,; 

R-l- 2..- ~· i"o/oo 

2o may Zo;s C:akvrli(Z ux-~s 7/_ ~- 7 / ((?..,./ 7' 

"c-., tLL· , . 11~- ~~ l"1u-·~s,84,33, UL~" ~~~ I' I()~ . ]'L 

..J._ ~ tL C/lJ\ )?~ CofJ bb fh ~ rno/ffh\ 6Ul I¥Jua.a 

to1fU4 (l,f~ {M Cow.-/~ nocJ WD7-ooh'fS-SC4); t.uo'7-. 

111~9-5 (A-); 6JoFJ-'J 19'7o-5(.4) ;· ~ vJo'l-F? 1'1'1o--s C4'J)1 ~- ~ 

llePv. /U..UWrof rrtj Cof~ 'bruJc ;'~ doh_ ~('·(' {%) .J MtJ=htf_ 

!}wt o{jft.R- J/vl601rMJ f(<R_ 1 k{yc!Ll ; ~b .J2 IJ.fo>~J c.c_ ''Pc&k 

.Df-CL?>'lf cr ~ Of'J .JtL-h.-cALJ -b {'f'e_ J .J /Ttr.v.rf ~ 0t_ (} ~f !)'- .J 

J.LJ -64f; 0-vtd)r:we f\.R .MCRMJ -tJ,.,o. L'ofj /y:u,lt_j ~ ob ~­

-4; :;f/VI- h~ cJ.AYJLc0 . .w:kf;} ~ fT'l, f~~_£ MAt!jPNl 

-tl\-0 df~e:t !lcl<-e_- ~/{_ !J{/U_6tf) oP( !J&v~ ~'-(__ ~e~ 

16U\h .ir1 -lA~ ~ -

RECEIVED lN 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APP~AL.t.\ 

MAY 2n 20\5 

'hf i&yM) ~ 

zs· :>.·-

,, 

--fr ~ k .Pro k:,~ <tf/'18o8'2(,
Exhibit 10.27


 


Escalade, Incorporated


Schedule of Executive Officer Compensation


 


Compensation for the executive officers of
Escalade, Incorporated consists of a base salary, bonuses and long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants or restricted
stock unit grants.


 


Base Salary


In general, base salaries are set at the beginning
of each year based upon changes in the employee’s level of responsibility, individual performance reviews conducted by the
Company’s Compensation Committee and changes in the cost of living.


 


Bonuses


The Company’s Compensation Committee
has established a profit incentive plan that provides for the payment of cash bonuses if certain performance targets are achieved.
Under the plan, the Compensation Committee establishes target performance levels early in each fiscal year, subject to potential
changes that the Committee may determine appropriate. Virtually all employees are eligible to participate in the profit incentive
plan. In conjunction with the completion of the Company’s annual audited financial statements, the bonus pool is finalized
based on actual results achieved. Allocation of the bonus pool to individual executive officers is determined at the Compensation
Committee’s discretion based upon a review of the overall Company’s performance relative to budget, the Company’s
strategic position, and individual executive officer’s performance relative to budget. There are no pre-defined methods for
allocating the bonus pool to any of the Company’s executive officers.


 


Long-Term Incentives


Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated
2007 Incentive Plan, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive long term incentive compensation in various forms
including stock options and restricted stock units. The Company’s Compensation Committee has full discretion over the form,
amount and timing of these grants which historically have been annual grants. In its determination of annual grants, the Compensation
Committee considers performance of both the individual and the Company.


 


Additional Benefits


Executive officers are eligible to participate
in the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan and receive Company matching contributions in accordance with the plan terms. The
Company also pays group term life insurance benefits on behalf of executive officers. The Company’s Chairman of the Board,
Robert Griffin, participated in a salary deferral plan that earned interest on undistributed amounts at the rate of 9% per annum.
The entire balance of this plan was distributed to Mr. Griffin in a taxable transaction in April 2010.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Elder and Bumgardner Argued at Salem, Virginia

BARRY WAYN E WICKER MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0293-01-3 JU DGE RUDOLPH BU MGARDNER, III DECEMBER 18, 2001 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COUR T OF BOTETOURT COUNTY George E. Honts, III, Judge James V. Doss, III, for appellant. John H. McLees, Jr ., Senior Assistant Attorney General (R andolph A. Beales, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

The trial court convicted Barry Wayne Wicker of reckless driving in violation of Code § 46.2-862. 1 On appeal, he contends the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him. For the following reasons, we affirm. The defendant received a summons for driving a tractor-trailer 91 miles per hour. The defendant signed the summons promising to appear for trial, but he did not. By

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

1 Code "§ 46.2-862. Exceeding speed limit.

**—** A person shall be guilty of reckless driving who drives a motor vehicle on the highways in the Commonwealth . . . in excess of eighty miles per hour regardless of the applicable maximum speed limit."counsel, the defendant entered a plea of not guilty and waived a jury. The Commonwealth waived imposition of a jail sentence so the trial could proceed in the defendant's absence, but it argued for a substantial fine and license suspension. The trial court found the defendant guilty, imposed a $1,000 fine, and suspended his license for nine months. 2 On appeal, the defendant contends the trial court erred by imposing a punitive fine and an excessive license suspension because it could not impose a jail sentence. He also maintains the suspension improperly amounted to a forfeiture of his Pennsylvania commercial driver's license. The statement of facts fails to show that the defendant preserved these issues for appeal. It contains no record of the arguments presented at trial nor the objections made to the sentence imposed. "We cannot assume that appellant's objection and reasons were proffered but not made a part of the record." Lee v. Lee , 12 Va. App. 512, 516, 404 S.E.2d 736, 738 (1991). We do not consider an objection not stated at trial. Rule 5A:18.

2 The Commonwealth concedes the defendant's license could not be suspended for more than six months, Code § 46.2-393, and asks us to vacate the excess portion of the suspension. Wheeling v. City of Roanoke , 2 Va. App. 42, 43 n.1, 341 S.E.2d 389, 389 n.1 (1986).

- 2 -We affirm the trial court but remand for it to vacate that portion of the license suspension in excess of the statutory

maximum. Affirmed and remanded in part.

- 3 -
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
                                  OF QT 5, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of Quick Med Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (a)  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June
               30, 2003 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

          (b)  Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

Dated: September 25, 2003



/s/ MICHAEL GRANITO
--------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Granito
Chairman


/s/ DAVID LERNER
--------------------------------------------------------------
David Lerner
President and Chief Financial Officer


                                       38
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3564 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3564

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2012

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the Public Interest Declassification Act of 2000 until 2014 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Interest Declassification 
Board Reauthorization Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC INTEREST DECLASSIFICATION BOARD.

    (a) Subsequent Appointment.--Section 703(c)(2)(D) of the Public 
Interest Declassification Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 50 U.S.C. 
435 note) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 
``from the date of the appointment.''.
    (b) Vacancy.--Section 703(c)(3) of the Public Interest 
Declassification Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 50 U.S.C. 435 note) 
is amended by striking ``A member of the Board appointed to fill a 
vacancy before the expiration of a term shall serve for the remainder 
of the term.''.
    (c) Extension of Sunset.--Section 710(b) of the Public Interest 
Declassification Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 50 U.S.C. 435 note) 
is amended by striking ``2012.'' inserting ``2014.''.

            Passed the Senate December 11, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
January 1, 2004
 
 
 John Emery
 
 Re:   Amendment to Employment Agreement
 
 Dear John:
 
 This letter confirms our agreement and shall serve to amend the August 13, 2001 Employment Agreement between you and the Company in accordance with the following:
 
 3 (d)      Bonus
 The paragraph shall be amended to read as follows:
 
 The Executive shall be eligible for a bonus in each calendar year, based on the Executives success in reaching or exceeding performance objectives as determined by the Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee, the amount of such bonus, if any, to be determined in the discretion of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Executive remains employed by the Company through the bonus payout date, the Executive shall be entitled to a bonus range of 0 - 100% (50% target) of the Executives then current base salary, with the amount of such bonus, if any, remaining subject to the discretion of the Company.
 3 (g)      Travel Allowance
 The paragraph shall be amended to read as follows:
 During the period of Executives employment by the Company, the Company shall pay to the Executive as a travel allowance the net amount of $500.00 per month.
 
 Very truly yours,
 
 VENTIV HEALTH, INC.
 
 By:
 /s/    ERAN BROSHYEran Broshy
Chief Executive Officer 
  Accepted and agreed to by:
 /s/    John R. EmeryJohn R. Emery
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40314 Conference Calendar

CARDELL FRANKLIN BURTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENT RAMSEY; C. MCKNIGHT; SHARON L. YORK; P. WALTON; MARK TOMBLIN; BONNY SELLERS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-cv-1054

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cardell Franklin Burton (#221804) appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Burton contends: (1) that the district court erred in adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation without providing him with an opportunity to file objections; (2) that he should have been given an opportunity to amend his complaint; and (3) that theNo. 96-40314 -2- district court failed to rule on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have carefully reviewed the brief and the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Burton that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Burton is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Preston Leonard SCHOFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CITY OF TAMPA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4494

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 21  - SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<S>   <C>                                               <C>
1.    PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
      (Wireline segment doing busines as Puerto Rico
      Telephone)

      (Wireless segment doing business as
      Verizon Wireless)

      Physical address:                                 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
      Mailing address:                                  P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998
      State/jurisdiction of                             Puerto Rico
      Incorporation:

2.    COQUI.NET CORPORATION
      (Doing business as Coqui.net)

      Physical address:                                 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
      Mailing address:                                  P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998
      State/jurisdiction of                             Puerto Rico
      Incorporation:

3.    PRT LARGA DISTANCIA, INC.
      (Doing business as PRT Larga Distancia)

      Physical address:                                 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
      Mailing address:                                  P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998
      State/jurisdiction of Incorporation:              Puerto Rico
</TABLE>
7/28/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2011

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2011

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:10 AM

To: dslack67@yahoo.com

Dear Mr. Slack:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015−2011).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/11/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­9677.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking