alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 

 
 



 
 January 9, 2012 
 Brown & Brown, Inc. 
 220 South Ridgewood Avenue 

Daytona, Florida 23115-2412 
 Attention: Cory T.
Walker, Treasurer and CFO 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (the “Bank”) is pleased to advise that it is prepared to offer a line of credit to Brown & Brown, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) up to
the maximum amount of $50 million, for payment of a portion of the acquisition price of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc. The offering of this line of credit constitutes an agreement by the Bank to perform an ongoing credit review of the
Company to enable the Bank to respond quickly to any request for credit that the Company may make. The line of credit is not a commitment and does not in any way obligate the Bank to make loans or grant any credit. Each decision to make an advance
hereunder is discretionary: if the Bank decides to make one advance under this line, the Bank may still use its sole discretion to make or deny any subsequent advance under this line. 

Any credit which the Bank may extend will be on such terms and conditions and will bear interest at such rate as the Bank may require at
the time the Company requests an advance and must be evidenced by documents in form and substance satisfactory to the Bank. 

The Bank will consider requests for advances under the line until February 3, 2012, unless this discretionary line is earlier
terminated by the Company or the Bank. This line of credit is issued subject to such factors as the Bank may find relevant at the time of the request, including, without limitation, money market conditions remaining the same as at present; the Bank
in its sole discretion continuing to be satisfied with the Company’s financial condition and economic prospects; and the Company’s maintenance of a satisfactory relationship with the Bank. 







 This letter is for the Company’s information only and is not to be shown to or relied upon by third
parties. This letter constitutes the entire understanding between the Bank and the Company with respect to the matters set forth herein and supercedes all prior discussions. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
		
	By	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	



  
 2
**EXHIBIT        32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION        **

| (1) | The                  Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  By | /s/                  Kirk R. Rowland     |   |
|--------|----------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |     | Kirk                  R. Rowland         |   |
|   |     | Chief                  Financial Officer |   |
Case 20-10411-PGH Doc 20 Filed 02/25/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 20-10411-PGH Doc 20 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 20-10411-PGH Doc 20 Filed 02/25/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 20-10411-PGH Doc 20 Filed 02/25/20 Page 4 of 4
## Badlands - Worst - Total Extinction Badlands - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction BADL1 NIA 2000 19 63.49 BADL1 NIA 2000 19 3.63 BADL1 NIA 2001 24 59.32 BADL1 NIA 2001 24 7.41 BADL1 NIA 2002 23 51.28 BADL1 NIA 2002 23 4.68 BADL1 NIA 2003 24 61.53 BADL1 NIA 2003 24 7.18 BADL1 NIA 2004 25 50.25 BADL1 NIA 2004 25 6.33 

## 285.87 Total 29.23 Total 57.174 Average 5.846 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 10%
Badlands - Best - Total Extinction Badlands - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction BADL1 NIA 2000 18 21.09 BADL1 NIA 2000 18 1.4 BADL1 NIA 2001 24 21.15 BADL1 NIA 2001 24 1.58 BADL1 NIA 2002 23 19.58 BADL1 NIA 2002 23 0.91 BADL1 NIA 2003 23 18.81 BADL1 NIA 2003 23 0.79 BADL1 NIA 2004 24 19.44 BADL1 NIA 2004 24 1.32 

## 100.07 Total 6 Total 20.014 Average 1.2 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 6%
Wind Cave - Worst - Total Extinction Wind Cave - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction WICA1 NIA 2000 19 51.94 WICA1 NIA 2000 19 4.69 WICA1 NIA 2001 20 48.09 WICA1 NIA 2001 20 9.33 WICA1 NIA 2002 24 55.29 WICA1 NIA 2002 24 5.85 WICA1 NIA 2003 24 51.05 WICA1 NIA 2003 24 6.19 WICA1 NIA 2004 25 47.32 WICA1 NIA 2004 25 8.85 

## 253.69 Total 34.91 Total 50.738 Average 6.982 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 14%
Wind Cave - Best - Total Extinction Wind Cave - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction WICA1 NIA 2000 18 17.59 WICA1 NIA 2000 18 1.1 WICA1 NIA 2001 19 16.75 WICA1 NIA 2001 19 0.88 WICA1 NIA 2002 23 16.95 WICA1 NIA 2002 23 0.68 WICA1 NIA 2003 23 16.5 WICA1 NIA 2003 23 0.54 WICA1 NIA 2004 24 16.26 WICA1 NIA 2004 24 0.82 

## 84.05 Total 4.02 Total 16.81 Average 0.804 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 5%
Charlene MOONEY and Kevin Westman, Sr., Appellants, v. Terrance L. HORTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Leland Horton, Jr., Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3019

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 06-0544 IN RE PETITION OF RACHEL PARKIN FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

# FILED JUL 2 0 2021 Bowen C3reenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Tritymytana

Rachel Parkin has petitioned the Courtforreinstatement to active status in the State Bar of Montana. Parkin was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31,2021. Parkin has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying thatParkin has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 13 ofthe CLE Rules. The Petition states that Parkin is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not cornrnitted any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofRachel Parkin for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. Upon paymentofany remaining dues,fees,and the state license tax to the State Bar ofMontana,Parkin shall be reinstated. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana' DATED this day ofJuly,2021.
ChiefJust'



# (76 07/20/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544

## /94 in AUL Justices

7
2011 and 2012 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.36 
 2011 and 2012 Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements 
 The
compensation for the executive officers of Cerus Corporation regarding annual base salaries and target bonus percentages were as follows: 
  

																	
	 Name
	  	2011
Annual Base
Salary (1)	 	  	2011
Targeted Bonus
(as a % of 2011
Annual Base
Salary)	 	 	2012
Annual Base
Salary (2)	 	  	2012
Targeted Bonus
(as a % of 2012
Annual Base
Salary)	 
	 Claes Glassell(3)
 Former President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	500,000	  	  	 	60	% 	 	 	—  	  	  	 	—  	  
					
	 William M. Greenman(4)
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	415,000	  	  	 	60	% 	 	$	475,000	  	  	 	60	% 
					
	 Laurence M. Corash, M.D.

Senior Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer
	  	$	378,755	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	390,113	  	  	 	35	% 
					
	 Howard G. Ervin

Vice President, Legal Affairs and Chief Legal Officer
	  	$	317,761	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	327,295	  	  	 	35	% 
					
	 Kevin D. Green

Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
	  	$	242,000	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	263,780	  	  	 	35	% 
					
	 Caspar Hogeboom(5)
 President, Cerus Europe B.V. (6)
	  	$	286,834	  	  	 	35	% 	 	$	290,936	  	  	 	35	% 

  

	(1)	Annual base salary was effective March 1, 2011, except for Mr. Greenman, as discussed in footnote 4 below. 


	(2)	Annual base salary was effective March 1, 2012. 


	(3)	Mr. Glassell resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer effective April 18, 2011. 


	(4)	Mr. Greenman became President and Chief Executive Officer effective April 18, 2011. Prior to his role as President and Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Greenman served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Business Development & Marketing and Chief Business Officer, with an annual base salary of $321,360 and a target bonus percentage of 35%, effective March 1, 2011.



	(5)	Mr. Hogeboom’s annual base salary has been converted from Euros to United States dollar. Mr. Hogeboom’s 2011 annual base salary of €206,000 has
been converted from Euros to United States dollar by applying an average exchange rate of €1 to $1.3924 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Mr. Hogeboom’s 2012 annual base salary of €224,540 has been converted from Euros
to United States dollar using the exchange rate of €1 to $1.2957, which was the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2011. 


	(6)	Mr. Hogeboom’s title changed from General Manager, Cerus Europe to President, Cerus Europe B.V., effective March 1, 2012.
EXHIBIT  32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Gary D. Lewis, Chairman of American Development & Investment Fund, Inc. (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that:





1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 24th of May, 2010.





/s/ Gary D. Lewis


By .........................


Gary D. Lewis,


Chairman





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Development & Investment Fund, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and


Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion issued June 29, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00070-CV

NO. 01-23-00073-CV

———————————

KOFFEY SMITH EL-BEY, Appellant

V.

THE ESTATE OF ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, DECEASED AND PEGGY 

RUTH WILLIAMS AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case Nos. 1197771 & 1197755

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Appellant Koffey Smith El-Bey attempts to appeal from the county court’s 

interlocutory order, signed on March 25, 2023, entitled “Order For Statement of 

Inability Affidavit.”

Generally, a Texas appellate court has jurisdiction to hear only an appeal from 

a final judgment. Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992). 

However, appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of 

interlocutory orders if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction. Stary v. 

DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352–53 (Tex. 1998); New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v. 

Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d 677, 679 (Tex. 1990); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE 

§ 51.014 (statutory list of appealable interlocutory orders). 

Here, the county court’s order denies appellant’s appeal of the justice court’s 

order sustaining the contest of his statement of inability to pay. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 

510.9(c)(4). Such order is not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order, 

and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to eviction suits do not otherwise 

provide a mechanism for appeal of such an order. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 500.3(e), 

510.9; Brown v. Hawkins, No. 05-16-001427-CV, 2018 WL 1312467, at *4 (Tex. 

App.—Dallas Mar. 14, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.); Redlich v. Ranch, No. 02-14-

00390, 2015 WL 226038, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 15, 2015, no pet.) 

(mem. op.) (stating, “We are aware of no statute that authorizes an appeal to this 
3

court from the county court’s decision on appeal from the justice court denying 

[appellant’s] attempt to appeal without furnishing a bond or paying a cash deposit”). 

On April 6, 2023, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice stating that this Court 

might dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response,

within 10 days of the notice, explaining how this Court has jurisdiction over this 

appeal. Appellant did not respond to the notice.1

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction and for failing to 

respond to this Court’s notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.

1 Appellant filed an untimely and deficient motion for extension to file a response on 

April 24, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b).
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT





Timothy P. Walbridge and Beth Sanders hereby certify as follows:





1.  They are the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Centennial First Financial Services.





2.  The Form 10-QSB of Centennial First Financial Services for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2002 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and the information contained in the report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Centennial First Financial Services.





/s/  Timothy P. WalbridgeTimothy P. Walbridge, Chief Executive Officer


/s/  Beth SandersBeth Sanders, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 9, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 15868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20409]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Part 160

[CGD 94-110]
RIN 2115-AE96


Recreational Inflatable Personal Flotation Device Standards

Correction

    In rule document 96-7301 beginning on page 13931, in the issue of 
Thursday, March 28, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 160.076-29  [Corrected]

    On page 13946, in the third column, in Sec. 160.076-29, in the two 
tables, in the heading of the two tables entitled ``Number of Samples 
Per Lot (Lot size)'', ``(Lot size)'' should be a separate heading that 
is located above the word ``Tests:'' in both tables.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Richard Lammel ARNOLD, Jr. v. STATE

CR-15-0735

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Delano Alfonca JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3876

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 13, 2018

Gregory W. Eisenmenger, of Eisenmenger, Robinson, Blaue & Peters, P.A., Viera, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

***ON CONCESSION OF ERROR***

PER CURIAM.

Delano Alfonca Jones appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to return property seized by the police at the time of his arrest. The State concedes error except as to the single firearm discharged by Jones resulting in the charges against him. We accept the State's concession and reverse the order denying return of the property seized by the police except as to the shotgun that formed the basis of count III of the charges brought against Jones.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-13104-BKC-PDR

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

MARC-AUREL GENECE

XXX-XX-2300

_____________________________/

REPORT OF COMPLIANCE

COMES NOW the Trustee, Robin R. Weiner, Esquire, and reports to the Court as follows:

DEBTOR

1. Pursuant to Administrative Order 98-6, a Notice of Delinquency was served on July 13, 2022, as a 

result of the Debtor's failure to remain current under the confirmed plan.

2. The Debtor is substantially current under the last filed Notice of Delinquency.

3. Accordingly, the Trustee reports that this case should proceed in the normal course.

WHEREFORE, the Trustee reports these facts to the court for appropriate action.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 30th day of August, 2022.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this 

court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of this Report Of Compliance 

was served, via U.S. first class mail, certified mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed on the attached 

service list this 30th day of August, 2022.

_____________________________________ /s/ Robin R. Weiner

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

TELEPHONE: 954-382-2001

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 861154

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 49 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 2
REPORT OF COMPLIANCE

CASE NO.: 20-13104-BKC-PDR

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

MARC-AUREL GENECE

5170 SW 19 ST

PLANTATION, FL 33317

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

JOHN D. SEGAUL, ESQUIRE

300 S PINE ISLAND ROAD

SUITE 304

PLANTATION, FL 33324

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 49 Filed 08/30/22 Page 2 of 2
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 60 Filed 05/16/24 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 60 Filed 05/16/24 Page 2 of 2
Order entered March 13, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01020-CR

JOSE DEJESUS VERGARA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-34977-I

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief had 

not been filed. On March 11, 2020, appellant filed his brief and a motion to extend 

time to file the same. In the interest of expediting this appeal and because the trial 

court has not held a hearing, we VACATE that portion of our February 20, 2020

order requiring a hearing and findings.
We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief filed as of the date of 

this order. 

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
Edgar Reynel PAZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1876

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

___________________

NO. 09-11-00486-CR

___________________

BYRON LEON BERKLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________________________________________________________ _

On Appeal from the 435th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-03-03054 CR

____________________________________________________________________ _ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

A jury convicted Byron Leon Berkley of engaging in organized criminal activity, 

enhanced, and the trial court sentenced Berkley to forty-five years in prison. Berkley’s 

appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the 

record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 

S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978). On September 6, 2012, we granted an extension of time for Berkley to file a pro 

se brief. We received no response from Berkley. We have determined that this appeal is 

wholly frivolous. We have independently examined the clerk’s record and the reporter’s 
2

record, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. We find it unnecessary to 

order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

However, according to the judgment, the trial court assessed $4,330.97 in 

attorney’s fees. The record does not indicate that Berkley has the financial resources to 

enable him to pay attorney’s fees. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 26.04(p), 

26.05(g) (West Supp. 2012); see also Roberts v. State, 327 S.W.3d 880, 883-84 (Tex. 

App.—Beaumont 2010, no pet.). Accordingly, we modify the judgment to delete the 

$4,330.97 in attorney’s fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified.1

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on December 28, 2012

Opinion Delivered February 6, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

 1

Berkley may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 22, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-11022]



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 22, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 54849]]



INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency for International Development

22 CFR Part 228

RIN 0412-AA28


Rules on Source, Origin, and Nationality for Commodities and 
Services Financed by the Agency for International Development

Correction

    In rule document 96-26246, beginning on page 53615, in the issue of 
Tuesday, October 15, 1996, make the following corrections:


Sec. 228.03  [Corrected]

    1. On page 53617, in the third column, in Sec. 228.03(b), in the 
sixth line, insert ``Iran,'' before ``North Korea,''.


Sec. 228.25  [Corrected]

    2. On page 53619, in the third column, in Sec. 228.25, in the 
fourth line, ``of'' should read ``or''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D