alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: January 26, 2017 521163 

________________________________

In the Matter of RALPH OYAGUE,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CLINTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: November 29, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ.

__________

Ralph Oyague, Huntington, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M.

Arnold of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliott III,

J.), entered March 31, 2015 in Albany County, which, in a

proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's

motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to

challenge a determination finding him guilty of violating certain

prison disciplinary rules. Respondent moved pursuant to CPLR

3211 (a) to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Petitioner

opposed the motion by claiming that he submitted an

administrative appeal and never received a response. Supreme

Court granted the motion and dismissed the petition. Petitioner

now appeals.

Petitioner properly served the notice of appeal upon

respondent (see CPLR 2103 [b] [2]), but the notice was apparently

never filed with the Albany County Clerk due to it having been
-2- 521163 

mistakenly mailed to the Albany County Attorney (see CPLR 5515

[1]). In view of petitioner's pro se status and the absence of

any allegation that the failure to file prejudiced respondent, we

"grant an extension of time to enable [petitioner] to cure his

mistake and, in the interest of justice and judicial economy,

address the merits" (Carp v Marcus, 138 AD2d 775, 776 [1988]

[internal citation omitted]; see CPLR 5520 [a]; M Entertainment,

Inc. v Leydier, 13 NY3d 827, 828-829 [2009]; Gamble v Gamble, 23

AD2d 887, 887 [1965]). 

Upon the merits, we affirm. Respondent supported the

motion to dismiss with an affidavit from the director of the

office responsible for issuing final administrative

determinations regarding tier III disciplinary hearing appeals. 

The director stated that he had reviewed the office's records and

that petitioner had not submitted an administrative appeal

regarding the determination at issue. The record accordingly

reflects that petitioner failed to take an administrative appeal

from the determination of guilt as required and, as a result,

Supreme Court properly concluded that petitioner had failed to

exhaust his administrative remedies and dismissed the petition

(see Matter of Tafari v Artus, 79 AD3d 1468, 1468-1469 [2010], lv

denied 16 NY3d 709 [2011]; Matter of Fulton v Futia, 71 AD3d

1356, 1356 [2010]).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur.
-3- 521163 

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs, upon

the condition that petitioner file the notice of appeal with the

Albany County Clerk within 30 days of the date of this Court's

decision.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 5, 1996 / Corrections 57003

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 28716; Amdt. No. 1760]

Standard Instrument Approach

Procedures; Miscellaneous

Amendments

Correction

In rule document 96–27703 beginning

on page 55735 in the issue of Tuesday,

October 29, 1996, make the following

correction:

§§ 97.23, 97.27, 97.33, 97.35 [Corrected]

On page 55736, in the second column,

in §§ 97.23, 97.27, 97.33, and 97.35, the

first paragraph should read:

‘‘By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/

DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME

or TACAN; § 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME;

§ 97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and § 97.35

COPTER SIAPs, identified as follows:’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and Philip Morris USA, Inc., Petitioner, v. In re: ENGLE PROGENY CASES TOBACCO LITIGATION, Respondent.

CASE NO. 5D16-1780

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

DATE: June 23, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, filed May 24, 2016, is denied.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re:

 Ron Vigdor Case No.: 20-12751-MAM

Chapter 13

Debtor(s).

 / 

NOTICE TO DEBTOR OF DUE DATE FOR FIRST

AND SUBSEQUENT PAYMENTS UNDER SECOND 

AMENDED CHAPTER 13 PLAN

COMES NOW, Nowack & Olson, PLLC, Attorneys for the Debtor(s), and gives this 

additional Notice to the Debtor of the Due Date for the first and subsequent payments under the

Chapter 13 Plan as follows:

AMOUNT OF MONTHLY PAYMENTS:

$128.00 for months 1 to 6 and $169.00 for months 7 to 60 ;

1st PAYMENT DUE DATE:

The 1st payment in the amount of $128.00 is due to the Chapter 13 Trustee, ROBIN WEINER

at:

Robin Weiner, Trustee

POB 2258

Memphis, TN 38101

on 3/28/2020 which is 30 days after the filing of this case. 

YOU MUST BE CURRENT (payments made on time), AND YOU

MUST REMAIN CURRENT ON ALL PAYMENTS TO THE

TRUSTEE UNDER YOUR PLAN OR YOUR CASE WILL BE

DISMISSED.

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 45 Filed 08/06/20 Page 1 of 2
IMPORTANT WARNING: REGARDING AMENDED CHAPTER 13 PLAN

IF THIS NOTICE IS BEING PROVIDED TO YOU AS A RESULT OF AN AMENDED PLAN,

ALL PAYMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED UNDER THE NEW AMENDED PLAN (YOU

MUST CATCH UP ON THE PAYMENTS UNDER THE AMENDED PLAN) MUST BE

CURRENT BEFORE THE 341 HEARING DATE, OR YOUR CASE WILL BE DISMISSED

BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. CONTACT OUR OFFICE IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT

OF THIS NOTICE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

SUCH PAYMENTS MUST BE MADE BY CASHIERS CHECK OR MONEY ORDER. DO

NOT SEND A PERSONAL CHECK. YOU MUST INCLUDE YOUR CASE NUMBER ON

YOUR PAYMENT. Subsequent payments in the same amount (unless your Plan is amended)

will be due on the same day (unless changed by your Chapter 13 Trustee) for each subsequent month

WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FROM THE COURT, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, OR COUNSEL.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent by U.S. Mail or via

CM/ECF to Robin Weiner, Trustee at POB 559006, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355, Office of the U.S.

Trustee, at 51 SW 1st Ave., Miami, FL 33130, and Ron Vigdor, Debtor(s), at 3900 NE 6th Drive

Boca Raton, FL 33431, , 

on 8-06-2020 .

Law Offices of

NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

Attorney for Debtor(s)

8551 Sunrise Blvd, Suite 208

Plantation, FL 33322

(954) 349-2265

/s/ Mitchell J. Nowack

MITCHELL J. NOWACK, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number: 099661

/s/ Christian J. Olson

CHRISTIAN J. OLSON, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number: 121436

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 45 Filed 08/06/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Luminescence dating of the Wabar meteorite craters, Saudi Arabia      

      January 1, 2004    

Luminescence dating has been used to find the age of meteorite impact craters at Wabar (Al Hadida) in Saudi Arabia. The luminescence characteristics of the shocked material were determined. Using a variety of luminescence dating techniques applied to impactite formed by the meteorite, and to the underlying sand, the age is found to be 290 ± 38 years. A comparison is made with two possible historically recorded ages. An impact as young as this has implications for the assessment of hazards from the impact on Earth of small meteorites.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Saudi Arabia
                  - Al Hadida
                  -  Ar-Rub' Al-Khali (Empty Quarter)

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 2, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6095.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, June 2, 2009, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. 
The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written 
statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Dave Coffman. 
For more information please contact Mr. Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, 
WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 22, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-9896 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
E.K. Ranjit, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Digimarc Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

|Date: December 8, 2003 |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:                    |  | /s/E.K. RANJITE.K. Ranjit Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
Alexis HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Alexis Hernandez, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic paleointensities from Long Valley Caldera, California      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

Paleointensities are being determined in order to characterize geomagnetic intensity variations during Quaternary time. Because the geomagnetic field acts as a shield against cosmic radiation, its intensity directly affects the production rate of radiocarbon (^C) in the upper atmosphere. Coe and others (1978) showed that the variation in dipole moment during Holocene time is nearly proportional to the difference between ^C and tree-ring age. The ^C timescale is currently well calibrated to about 9000 years B.P., and tentatively to about 13,000 years B.P., by comparison with tree-ring and glacial-varve chronologies (Stuiver and others, 1986). However, a comparison of ages determined by the l^C and 234u_230rh methods on coral samples off the island of Barbados (Bard and others, 1990) showed that U-Th ages were consistently older than ^4C ages in material older than about 9,000 years. The discrepancy is so large (3,500 years at 25,000 years B.P.) that Bard and others consider that it can only be due to a significant decrease in geomagnetic intensity during the last glacial period. Dipole field intensity has a similar modulating effect on the production of other cosmogenic nuclides that are used for geochronologic studies and will also affect their calibration curves. Mankinen and Champion (1993a,£) recently established broad trends in geomagnetic paleointensity for latest Pleistocene and Holocene time on Hawaii. The current study is the beginning of an effort to establish a similar record for western North America. Data from North America and Hawaii will eventually be averaged with other data from globally distributed locations to eliminate the effects on nondipole variations so that a true picture of the global (dipole) field can be obtained. The dipole variations can then be used to model accurately the production rate of cosmogenic nuclides as has been attempted by Mazaud and others (1991, 1994) using some relative paleointensity records from marine sediment cores.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Edward A Mankinen

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

emank@usgs.gov

650-329-4669

## Related Content

#### Edward A Mankinen

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

emank@usgs.gov

650-329-4669

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30,
2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2007 |  | /s/    CAROLYN V.
AVER                 
|                    |  | Carolyn V. Aver Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Agile Software Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
Filing of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Agile Software Corporation and will be retained by Agile Software Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39182-39183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2012-9978]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 141 and 142

[Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0090; FRL-9660-4]
RIN 2040-AF10

Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation 
(UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems

Correction

    In rule document 2012-9978 appearing on pages 26072-26101 in the 
issue of Wednesday, May 2, 2012, make the following correction:
    On pages 26072-26073, the table entitled ``EXHIBIT 1--APPLICABILITY 
OF UCMR 3 TO WATER UTILITIES BY SYSTEM TYPE AND SIZE'' should read as 
set forth below:

Exhibit 1--Applicability of UCMR 3 to Water Utilities by System Type and
                                  Size
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            System size \1\
                             -------------------------------------------
         System Type           Serving 
                                     10,000           Serving Fed on
  December 31, 2010.

[[Page 39183]]

[FR Doc. C1-2012-9978 Filed 6-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re Case No. 20-12862

Chapter 13

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

Miguel Angel Bolivar

1.

For legal services, I have agreed to accept..................................................................

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received.......................................................

Balance Due...................................................................................................................

$4,650.00 

$3,785.00 

$865.00 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and 

that compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for 

services rendered or to be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case 

is as follows:

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

  Debtor Other (specify)

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

  Debtor Other (specify)

4. 



I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and 

associates of my law firm.

I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with another person or persons who are not members or 

associates of my law firm. A copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the 

compensation, is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in 

bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statements of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

Case 20-12862-RAM Doc 4 Filed 03/01/20 Page 1 of 2
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following services:

CERTIFICATION

Date

02/27/2020 /s/ Christian Paul Larriviere, Esq.

Christian Paul Larriviere, Esq.

/s/ Miguel Angel Bolivar

Miguel Angel Bolivar

Bar No. 571156

Law Offices of Christian Paul Larriviere, P.A.

4340 Sheridan Street

Suite 102

Hollywood, Florida 33021

Phone: (954) 239-7150 / Fax: (954) 874-6110

 I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for 

representation of the debtor(s) in this bankruptcy proceeding.

Case 20-12862-RAM Doc 4 Filed 03/01/20 Page 2 of 2
Kord Lynn TUCKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2043

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Gharrett A. HERRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 7157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20226]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP95-11-003]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Amendment

Correction

    In notice document 96-3643 beginning on page 6366 in the issue of 
Tuesday, February 20, 1996 the Docket number should have appeared as 
set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SONIA PHILLIPS,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as 

Trustee for the Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 

2006-21CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-21CB,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-709

[December 14, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562012CA002519AXXXHC.

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for appellant.

Jennifer Lima-Smith of Gilbert Garcia Group, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
** **

**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Wehave issued our reports dated March 8, 2007, accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Digimarc Corporation included inthe Annual Report of Digimarc Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid reports in the registration statements of Digimarc Corporation on Form S-3(File No. 333-108670, effective September 10, 2003) and on Form S-8 (File No.333-128096, effective September 2, 2005, File No. 333-31114, effective February25, 2000, File No. 333-42042, effective July 24, 2000, File No. 333-65256, effectiveJuly 17, 2001, File No. 333-82660, effective February 13, 2002, File No.333-105097, effective May 8, 2003, and File No. 333-115074, effective April 30,2004).

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

Portland, Oregon

March 8, 2007

 

----