alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-13160-BKC-AJC

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

ANA L MEDINA

_____________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING CONFIRMATION HEARING AND MAKING ALL DEBTOR PAYMENTS 

NON-REFUNDABLE

THIS CASE came to be heard on June 23, 2020 upon the Confirmation Hearing of the Chapter 13 

Case, and based on the record, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

DEBTOR

1. The Confirmation Hearing is continued to July 28, 2020 at 1:35 pm by TELEPHONE. To 

participate call, Court Call (888)882-6878. If a party is unable to register online 

(https://www.courtcall.com), a reservation may also be made no later than 3:00pm on the business 

day preceding the date of the hearing by telephone at (888)882-6878.

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on July 8, 2020.

Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 35 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 2
 ORDER CONTINUING CONFIRMATION HEARING AND MAKING ALL DEBTOR PAYMENTS NON-REFUNDABLE

CASE NO.: 20-13160-BKC-AJC

2. The Debtor is ordered to continue making payments each month to the Chapter 13 Trustee in 

accordance with the last filed Chapter 13 Plan. Failure to continue payments may result in the 

dismissal of this case.

3. As a condition for the continued confirmation hearing and delay of payments to creditors, all 

payments held by the Chapter 13 Trustee shall be non-refundable and held in trust for the secured 

creditors as adequate protection, and in trust for priority and administrative creditors.

If this case is dismissed or converted, the Trustee shall disburse all funds which were received 

prior to the order of conversion or dismissal and held in trust. The disbursement shall be on a pro 

rata basis, less Trustee fees, to the secured, priority or administrative creditors pursuant to the 

proposed Chapter 13 Plan which was filed at least one day prior to last confirmation hearing date.

4.

###

ORDER SUBMITTED BY:

NANCY K. NEIDICH

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

ANA L MEDINA

4530 NW 179TH STREET

MIAMI GARDENS, FL 33055-3340

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

ROBERT SANCHEZ, ESQUIRE

355 W 49 STREET

HIALEAH, FL 33012

Case 20-13160-AJC Doc 35 Filed 07/09/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.2

 

EXHIBIT 2.13-1

[FORM OF]

REVOLVING NOTE

 

                              

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to               or its registered assigns (the “Lender”), in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreement (as hereinafter defined), the principal amount of each Revolving Loan from time to time made by the Lender to the Borrower under that certain Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2012 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among the Borrower, the Lenders identified therein and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings provided in the Credit Agreement.

 

The Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Revolving Loan from the date of such Revolving Loan until such principal amount is paid in full, at such interest rates and at such times as provided in the Credit Agreement.  All payments of principal and interest shall be made to the Administrative Agent for the account of the Lender in Dollars in immediately available funds at the Administrative Agent’s Office.  If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest, to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as well as after judgment) computed at the per annum rate set forth in the Credit Agreement.

 

This Revolving Note is one of the Revolving Notes referred to in the Credit Agreement, is entitled to the benefits thereof and may be prepaid in whole or in part subject to the terms and conditions provided therein.  This Note is also entitled to the benefits of the Collateral Agreement and is secured by the Collateral.  Upon the occurrence and continuation of one or more of the Events of Default specified in the Credit Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Revolving Note shall become, or may be declared to be, immediately due and payable all as provided in the Credit Agreement.  Revolving Loans made by the Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts or records maintained by the Lender in the ordinary course of business.  The Lender may also attach schedules to this Revolving Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its Revolving Loans and payments with respect thereto.

 

The Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment of this Revolving Note.

 

THIS REVOLVING NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

 

	
 
    	
MAC-GRAY CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    
	
 
    	
Title:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Sensitivity of water resources in the Delaware River basin to climate variability and change      

      January 1, 1993    

View Document

Because of the "greenhouse effect," projected increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels might cause global warming, which in turn could result in changes in precipitation patterns and evapotranspiration and in increases in sea level. This report describes the greenhouse effect; discusses the problems and uncertainties associated with the detection, prediction, and effects of climatic change, and presents the results of sensitivity-analysis studies of the potential effects of climate change on water resources in the Delaware River basin.

On the basis of sensitivity analyses, potentially serious shortfalls of certain water resources in the basin could result if some climatic-change scenarios become true. The results of basin streamflow-model simulations in this study demonstrate the difficulty in distinguishing effects of climatic change on streamflow and water supply from effects of natural variability in current climate. The future direction of basin changes in most water resources, furthermore, cannot be determined precisely because of uncertainty in current projections of regional temperature and precipitation. This large uncertainty indicates that, for resource planning, information defining the sensitivities of water resources to a range of climate change is most relevant. The sensitivity analyses could be useful in developing contingency plans on how to evaluate and respond to changes, should they occur.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David M Wolock, Ph.D.

##### Hydrologist (Research)

Water Resources Mission Area

dwolock@usgs.gov

785-832-3528

## Related Content

#### David M Wolock, Ph.D.

##### Hydrologist (Research)

Water Resources Mission Area

dwolock@usgs.gov

785-832-3528

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### David M Wolock, Ph.D.

##### Hydrologist (Research)

Water Resources Mission Area

dwolock@usgs.gov

785-832-3528

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Delaware River
                  - Delaware;New Jersey;Pennsylvania
                  - Delaware
                  - New Jersey
                  - Pennsylvania

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 17571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40406]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Deon STEPLIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3615

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Summary of the GK15 ground‐motion prediction equation for horizontal PGA and 5% damped PSA from shallow crustal continental earthquakes      

      May 1, 2016    

We present a revised ground‐motion prediction equation (GMPE) for computing medians and standard deviations of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and 5% damped pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) response ordinates of the horizontal component of randomly oriented ground motions to be used for seismic‐hazard analyses and engineering applications. This GMPE is derived from the expanded Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)‐West 1 database (see Data and Resources; Chiou et al., 2008). The revised model includes an anelastic attenuation term as a function of quality factor (Q0) to capture regional differences in far‐source (beyond 150 km) attenuation, and a new frequency‐dependent sedimentary‐basin scaling term as a function of depth to the 1.5  km/s shear‐wave velocity isosurface to improve ground‐motion predictions at sites located on deep sedimentary basins. The new Graizer–Kalkan 2015 (GK15) model, developed to be simple, is applicable for the western United States and other similar shallow crustal continental regions in active tectonic environments for earthquakes with moment magnitudes (M) 5.0–8.0, distances 0–250 km, average shear‐wave velocities in the upper 30 m (VS30) 200–1300  m/s, and spectral periods (T) 0.01–5 s. Our aleatory variability model captures interevent (between‐event) variability, which decreases with magnitude and increases with distance. The mixed‐effect residuals analysis reveals that the GK15 has no trend with respect to the independent predictor parameters. Compared to our 2007–2009 GMPE, the PGA values are very similar, whereas spectral ordinates predicted are larger at T<0.2  s and they are smaller at longer periods.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - armenia
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Italy
                  -  Taiwan
                  -  Turkey
                  -  United States
                  -  Uzbekistan
                  - Alaska
                  -  California
                  -  Nevada

View All **
Sl()-l()()9()l-()7^ ) 

APARTMENT Of 

;U,NSF0RW10H 

••: KhT OPERATIONS 

m OCT ! 2 A S: I 2 

'OF COMMERCE 

R 

August 26,2010 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

United ^te s Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, OC 20590 

Re: Support of the South Bend Regional Airport Application for Funding Under the Department of 

Transportation Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

On behalf of the Warsaw/Kosdusko County Chamt}er of Commerce, I am delighted to support the 

Small Community Air Service Development Grant application submitted by the St. Joseph County 

Airport Authority for marketing funding to encoure^e a new carrier to enter the South Bend market 

with non'Stop service to Denver, CO. 

Air servk;e devetopment is important for the economk: health of our regk)n. Businesses and 

resdents must have access to the gtobal transportatton system at affordable fares. South Bend 

Regional Airport's importance to the Mk^iana regkm and Kosciusko County cannot be overstated. 

Ourquality of life i? linked to the airport's growth now and in the future. 

This appik»tion is an excellent opportunity tor St. Joseph County, Kosciusko County, and Mrchiana 

to leverage scarce resources to help devetop air servtoe at South Bend Airport by supporting this 

appficatton under the Small Community Air Service Devetopment Grant program. 

The potential benefit to Kosciusto County is great. We urge you to fiiiiy fund the request from the 

South Bend Regtonal Airport. 

Sincerely, 

Trina Hoy 

Director of Communteattons & Events 

Warsaw/Kosdusko County Chamber of Commerce 

M5 Soutli BnfUlo Sireet, Suite A . Warsaw, Indiana 45580 

5T4.267.6511 . 800.776.6311 . FAX 574.267.776*2
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

April 25, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00741-CV

IN RE SCOTT M. CLEARMAN, Relator 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

Probate Court No. 1 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 461,672 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Relator Scott M. Clearman filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, 

relator asks this court to compel the presiding judge of Probate Court No. 1 of Harris 

County to vacate the July 10, 2018 order denying relator’s motion to quash and for 
2

protection and the August 2, 2018 order denying relator’s motion for 

reconsideration. 

On April 18, 2019, relator advised this court that the parties had settled the 

matter. Relator’s request for relief in the petition for writ of mandamus is now moot. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed. 

We lift the stay entered on August 29, 2018. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
Victoria SZURANT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Josef AARONSON, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
The WHITING-TURNER CONTRACTING COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LOFT DOWNTOWN II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the  purposes of  complying  with  Section 1,  U.S.C.,  1950,  I, the
undersigned  Chairman  of the  Board  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  M.B.A.
Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify, based on my knowledge,  that the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the  quarter  ended April 30,
2005 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company.

Dated June 14, 2005


                                            By  /s/ Gaylen M. Brotherson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                    Gaylen M. Brotherson
                                                    Chairman of the Board and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




                                       16
Form CGFCRD3 (7/14/2020)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−17132−LMI

Chapter: 7

In re:

Carlos R. Weissenberg

12344 SW 94th Lane

Miami, FL 33186

SSN: xxx−xx−2506

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Laurel M Isicoff

on November 9, 2020 at 09:30 AM

by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions LLC.

To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

**EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY** Until further notice or unless directed otherwise, the court will ONLY hold

hearings by TELEPHONE. Individuals not represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic

services FREE of charge. All attorneys shall advise their clients NOT to appear at the courthouse.

to consider the following:

Objection to (47 Order Determining Debtor's Compliance with Section 521(a)(1)) Filed by Creditor

Denmark Properties Limited (Ayala Maura, Eduardo) (49)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party

who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard

thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 10/13/20 CLERK OF COURT

By: Noemi Sanabria

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-17132-LMI Doc 50 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 1
Jermain T. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1467

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 14, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (Monday, March 13, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60313]

                                                    VOL. 60, NO. 48

                                             Monday, March 13, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 48/Monday, March 13, 1995/Corrections
[[Page 13515]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 29

[TB-94-32]

Tobacco Inspection; Growers' Referendum Results

Correction

    In rule document 95-5537 beginning on page 12400 in the issue of 
Tuesday, March 7, 1995 make the following correction:
    On page 12400, in the second column, under EFFECTIVE DATE:, in the 
first line, ``April 6, 1992.'' should read ``April 6, 1995.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4768 

To amend title 5, United States Code, with respect to the judicial review 

of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2016 

Mr. RATCLIFFE (for himself, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. MARINO, Mr. CHAFFETZ, 

Mr. BUCK, Mr. YOHO, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. BRAT, Mrs. 

LOVE, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. BABIN, Mr. SALMON, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, Mr. PALMER, Mr. 

MESSER, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. LABRADOR, Mr. TROTT, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. ISSA, Mr. 

WESTERMAN, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CULBERSON, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. WALKER, Mr. OLSON, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

RENACCI, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. GOSAR, Mrs. 

MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, 

Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. GRIFFITH, 

and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, with respect to the 

judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory and 

regulatory provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4768 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Separation of Powers 

3 Restoration Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATUTORY AND REGU5 LATORY INTERPRETATIONS. 

6 Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amend7 ed, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘all 

8 relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and stat9 utory provisions’’ and inserting ‘‘de novo all relevant ques10 tions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional 

11 and statutory provisions and rules’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
December 22, 1997 

Harold F. Reheis, Director 

Environmental Protection Division 

4041656-471 3 

Mr. John H. Hankinson 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street 

Atlanta. Georgia 30303 

Dear Mr. Hankinson: 

On November 13, 1992, we submitted to you a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) to incorporate generic oxides of nitrogen (NO,) and volatile 

organic compound (VOC) reasonably available control technology (RACT) rules. EPA 

took the position that RACT rules without emission limits could not be approved into 

the SIP. Therefore, on November 15, 1994, we submitted source specific permits 

that required NO, and VOC RACT on the same sources that would have been subject 

to the generic RACT rules. As a result, there is no need to act on the generic NO, 

and VOC RACT rules contained in the November 13, 1992 request. At this time, we 

would like to withdraw the November 13, 1992 request. 

Please contact me if there are any questions about this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Harold i. Reheis 

Director
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 3689

Unemployed

Number in thousands

16 to 24 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024887Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 16-24 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:25 PM)
Andrew DALEY, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Morgana C. WARD-DALEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4725

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 06, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied. Stricken.

Dismissed as moot.

Vacated.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Response of spectral vegetation indices to soil moisture in grasslands and shrublands      

      January 1, 2011    

The relationships between satellite-derived vegetation indices (VIs) and soil moisture are complicated because of the time lag of the vegetation response to soil moisture. In this study, we used a distributed lag regression model to evaluate the lag responses of VIs to soil moisture for grasslands and shrublands at Soil Climate Analysis Network sites in the central and western United States. We examined the relationships between Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived VIs and soil moisture measurements. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) showed significant lag responses to soil moisture. The lag length varies from 8 to 56 days for NDVI and from 16 to 56 days for NDWI. However, the lag response of NDVI and NDWI to soil moisture varied among the sites. Our study suggests that the lag effect needs to be taken into consideration when the VIs are used to estimate soil moisture.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547