alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004188EN.01000801.xml

| 27.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 188/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 188/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1022/2004

of 26 May 2004

determining the extent to which applications lodged in May 2004 for import licences for certain pigmeat products under the regime provided for by the Agreements concluded by the Community with the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/97 of 29 September 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application in the pigmeat sector of the arrangements provided for by the Agreements concluded by the Community with the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Hungary (1), and in particular Article 4(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 are for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences lodged for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 are for quantities less than or equal to the quantities available and can therefore be met in full.

| (2) | It is appropriate to draw the attention of operators to the fact that licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to draw the attention of operators to the fact that licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1898/97 shall be met as referred to in the Annex.

2.   Licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 267, 30.9.1997, p. 58. Regualtion as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 333/2004 (OJ L 60, 27.2.2004, p. 12).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 |
| --- | --- |
| B1 | 100,0 |
| 15 | 100,0 |
| 16 | 100,0 |
| 17 | 100,0 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004

B1

100,0

15

100,0

16

100,0

17

100,0

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Snow processes in mountain forests: Interception modeling for coarse-scale applications      

      June 15, 2020    

Snow interception by the forest canopy controls the spatial heterogeneity of subcanopy snow accumulation leading to significant differences between forested and nonforested areas at a variety of scales. Snow intercepted by the forest canopy can also drastically change the surface albedo. As such, accurately modeling snow interception is of importance for various model applications such as hydrological, weather, and climate predictions. Due to difficulties in the direct measurements of snow interception, previous empirical snow interception models were developed at just the point scale. The lack of spatially extensive data sets has hindered the validation of snow interception models in different snow climates, forest types, and at various spatial scales and has reduced the accurate representation of snow interception in coarse-scale models. We present two novel empirical models for the spatial mean and one for the standard deviation of snow interception derived from an extensive snow interception data set collected in an evergreen coniferous forest in the Swiss Alps. Besides open-site snowfall, subgrid model input parameters include the standard deviation of the DSM (digital surface model) and/or the sky view factor, both of which can be easily precomputed. Validation of both models was performed with snow interception data sets acquired in geographically different locations under disparate weather conditions. Snow interception data sets from the Rocky Mountains, US, and the French Alps compared well to the modeled snow interception with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) for the spatial mean of ≤10 % for both models and NRMSE of the standard deviation of ≤13 %. Compared to a previous model for the spatial mean interception of snow water equivalent, the presented models show improved model performances. Our results indicate that the proposed snow interception models can be applied in coarse land surface model grid cells provided that a sufficiently fine-scale DSM is available to derive subgrid forest parameters.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### C. David Moeser

##### Hydrologist

New Mexico Water Science Center

cmoeser@usgs.gov

505-830-7955

## Related Content

#### C. David Moeser

##### Hydrologist

New Mexico Water Science Center

cmoeser@usgs.gov

505-830-7955

### Contact

####               New Mexico Water Science Center          

6700 Edith Blvd NEAlbuquerque, NM87113United States

debclark@usgs.gov

(505) 830-7900

(505) 830-7998 

### Explore Search

                  - Water
                  - france
                  -  United States
                  - French Alps
                  -  Rocky Mountains
                  - Utah

View All **
Arthur Jay MOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Antwan Jovon JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 22, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Gregory BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30301]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
p. 1 of 1 

From: Bilskis, Patricia A. [mailto:Patricia.Bilskis@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 3:14 PM 

To: Putney, David 

Subject: RE: RE: Alcoa Intalco - Wet Scrubber Engineering Testing - 

Draft Results & Lab Report 

DavidThe attached reports are hot off the press. Please let me know if you 

have any questions. 

Thank you! 

Trish 

From: Putney, David [mailto:putney.david@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:11 AM 

To: Bilskis, Patricia A. 

Subject: EXT: RE: Alcoa Intalco - Wet Scrubber Engineering Testing - 

Draft Results & Lab Report 

Hello Patricia, 

Just checking in to see if you have received the final report for the 

testing that was conducted on the Intalco facility in April of 2014. 

If so, would you please send me an electronic copy of that report? 

Thanks, 

David Putney, Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 

Mail Drop D243-02 

Ph: (919) 541-2016 Fax: (919) 541-3207 

Email: putney.david@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian THARP, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In RE: RON VIGDOR § Case Number: 20-12751-MAM-13

§

Debtor(s) § Chapter: 13

REQUEST FOR NOTICE UNDER BANKRUPTCY RULE 2002

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT BMW Financial Services NA, LLC hereby gives notice as follows:

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §342(f)(1), AIS Portfolio Services, LP hereby requests that:

(i) all notices given or required to be given in the case; and

(ii) all pleadings and correspondence served or required to be served in this case,

regarding BMW Financial Services NA, LLC should be directed to AIS Portfolio Services, LP at the following mailing

address effective immediately:

Attn: BMW Financial Services NA, LLC Department

AIS Portfolio Services, LP

Account: XXXXXX3245

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

This request encompasses all notices, copies and pleadings referred to in Rules 2002, 9007 or 9008 of the

Bankruptcy Rules, including, without limitation, notices of any Orders, Motions, Demands, Complaints, Petitions,

Pleadings, Requests, Applications, Schedules, Statements, Plans, and any other documents brought before this court

in this case, whether formal or informal, written or oral, or transmitted or conveyed by mail, delivery, telephone,

telecopier, telex, or otherwise which affects or seeks to affect the above case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ketan Sawarkar

Ketan Sawarkar

Claims Processor

Bankruptcy Servicer for BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

AIS Portfolio Services, LP

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

(817)277-2011, Fax (817) 461-8070

ecfnotices@ascensioncapitalgroup.com

File # 1295568

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 6 Filed 03/05/20 Page 1 of 1
TLLP EX.10.18 12.31.2011


Exhibit 10.18


Schedule 5
To Supplemental Trucking Services Letter Agreement


Delivery of Crude Oil to Donnybrook, ND Rail Loading Facility




		
	1.
	Scope:  TLO shall gather crude oil from production facilities in North Dakota and Montana and deliver it by truck to a unit car rail loading facility at the intersection of Highway 52 and 380 Street NW in Donnybrook, North Dakota, 58734 (the “Donnybrook Rail Facility”).




		
	2.
	Rate:  The rate for trucking services related to deliveries of crude oil to the Donnybrook Rail Facility hereunder shall be $3.80/bbl.




		
	3.
	Commitment:  There shall be no minimum volume commitment, provided that TLO may require that each cargo be of sufficient size to schedule a full truck delivery to the Donnybrook Rail Facility. Volumes transported to the Donnybrook Rail Facility shall be supplemental to the Minimum Volume Commitment in the Trucking Agreement and shall be credited toward the Minimum Volume Commitment. 




		
	4.
	Term: Effective as of December 1, 2011 for an initial term of one month and from month to month thereafter until terminated by either Party on 30 days notice.




		
	5.
	Special Provisions:  None.








ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


TESORO LOGISTICS OPERATIONS LLC






/s/ PHILLIP M. ANDERSON
By:  Phillip M. Anderson
        President




TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY






/s/ RALPH J. GRIMMER
By:  Ralph J. Grimmer
        Vice President, Logistics
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20804]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Grant Award for the Provision of Civil Legal Services to Hawaii 
Migrant Farmworkers

Correction

    In notice document 95-18032 beginning on page 37690 in the issue of 
Friday, July 21, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 37691, in the first column, under DATES:, in the third 
line, ``August 12, 1995.'' should read ``August 21, 1995.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Space-time patterns of Late Cenozoic extension, vertical-axis rotation, and volcanism in the Crater Flat basin, southwest Nevada      

      January 1, 1998    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Crater Flats basin
                  - nevada

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Random crustal magnetization and its effect on coherence of short-wavelength marine magnetic anomalies      

      January 1, 1979    

Recent studies of DSDP samples from layer 2A of oceanic basement have found complex magnetic stratigraphies that seem incompatible with the frequent existence of linear short-wavelength anomalies caused by palaeomagnetic field behavior. Statistical models are developed for the lateral variation of the average magnetization of layer 2A: a Poisson series for reversals of the earth's field and a stairstep random series for discrete magnetic units. It is shown with the power-density spectra of these statistical models that lateral inhomogeneities must average out over distances of less than a few hundred meters. Specifically, individual magnetic units of the type seen at DSDP Site 332 cannot extend uniformly for distances greater than a few hundred meters.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Richard Blakely

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

blakely@usgs.gov

650-439-2316

## Related Content

#### Richard Blakely

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

blakely@usgs.gov

650-439-2316

### Contacts

#### Richard Blakely

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

blakely@usgs.gov

650-439-2316
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 38195 Civilian noninstitutional population Number in thousands 16 to 24 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU00024887Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Population Level - 16-24 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:07:22 PM)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Spatial and temporal variation of Cenozoic surface elevation in the Great Basin and Sierra Nevada      

      January 1, 2004    

The surface uplift of mountain belts caused by tectonism plays an important role in determining the long-term climate evolution of the Earth. However, the general lack of information on the paleotopography of mountain belts limits our ability to identify the links and feedbacks between topography, tectonics, and climate change on geologic time-scales. Here, we present a δ18O and δD record of authigenic minerals for the northern Great Basin that captures the timing and magnitude of regional surface uplift and subsidence events in the western United States during the Cenozoic. Authigenic calcite, smectite, and chert δ18O values suggest the northern Great Basin region experienced ~2km of surface uplift between the middle Eocene and early Oligocene followed by ~1 to 2km of surface subsidence in the southern Great Basin and/or Sierra Nevada since the middle Miocene. These data when combined with previously published work show that the surface uplift history varied in both space and time. Surface uplift migrated from north to south with high elevations in southern British Columbia and northeastern Washington in the middle Eocene and development of surface uplift in north and central Nevada in the Oligocene. This pattern of north to south surface uplift is similar to the timing of magmatism in the western Cordillera, a result that supports tectonic models linking magamtism with removal of mantle lithosphere and/or a subducting slab.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Great Basin
                  - california
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Utah

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 16, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 53996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-51016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

49 CFR Part 1111

[STB Ex Parte No. 527]


Expedited Procedures For Processing Rail Rate Reasonableness, 
Exemption And Revocation Proceedings

Correction

    In rule document 96-25515 beginning on page 52710 in the issue of 
Tuesday, October 8, 1996, make the following correction:


Sec. 1111.8  [Corrected]

    On page 52712, in the second column, in Sec. 1111.8, the second 
flush paragraph should read as set forth below:
Day 7 or before--Conference of the parties convened pursuant to section 
1111.9(b).

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Robert Roy HENION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Brad R. Schlesinger, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Klingensmith, J.

*538Appellant, Robert Roy Henion, was arrested and charged with felony battery and misdemeanor trespass. Immediately prior to appellant's plea hearing, his counsel reminded the trial judge of the judge's previous statement that he would be inclined to sentence appellant to eighteen months in prison followed by two years of community control if appellant entered an open plea to the charges. After appellant entered his no contest plea, the judge accepted it, and sentenced him to the agreed-upon eighteen months in prison with credit for time served followed by two years of community control for battery. Appellant was also sentenced to sixty days in jail for trespassing; however, appellant's credit for time served satisfied the jail sentence. The sentencing scoresheet was filed later the same day, but improperly included an additional charge of assault in its calculation, which caused appellant's scoresheet to total 38.30 points instead of 38.10. He argues on appeal that the trial court committed error by sentencing him based upon an incorrectly calculated scoresheet.

While we agree that the scoresheet was incorrectly calculated, we find that sentencing was proper because the record shows that the trial judge would have imposed the same sentence on appellant regardless of the scoresheet error. Thus, we affirm appellant's sentence, but remand to the trial court for the entry of a properly calculated scoresheet. *See**Brooks v. State* , 969 So.2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007) (holding that when scoresheet errors are presented via (1) direct appeal, (2) Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), or (3) Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, then "any error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court *would have imposed* the same sentence using a correct scoresheet" (alteration in original) ); *Montoya v. State* , 943 So.2d 253, 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("Under the 'would-have-been-imposed' standard, a scoresheet error requires resentencing unless the record conclusively shows that the same sentence would have been imposed using a correct scoresheet ....").

Appellant need not be present for the purposes of correcting the scoresheet on remand. *See, e.g.* , *Thompson v. State* , 987 So.2d 727, 728-29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding that a defendant need not be present when a court simply corrects a sentencing designation in paperwork without otherwise changing the actual sentence imposed).

Gerber, C.J., and Damoorgian, J., concur.
Exhibit 31.2(a)





CERTIFICATIONS





I, James Essex, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CardioGenics
Holdings Inc.; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: January 27, 2012





|By | /s/
James Essex                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   | _________________                                                                     
|   | James
                                                  Essex

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Witness Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge and belief that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Dated: August 9, 2004 |  |     |  |                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | BY: |  | /s/DAVID B. GOULDDavid B. Gould Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Witness Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Witness
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Shorter contributions to general geology 1954; Permafrost and ground water in Alaska      

      January 1, 1955    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information