alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**** 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

I, Michael J. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc., certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Collectors Universe, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

****
# L_2004256EN.01000301.xml

| 3.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 256/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 256/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1405/2004

of 2 August 2004

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences for certain milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 of 26 January 1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products (2), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for export licences for milk products falling within CN code 0406, made on 28 July 2004 shall be rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2003 (OJ L 287, 5.11.2003, p. 13).

2

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 15, 2021 No. 04-21-00164-CV Melissa WALLACE and Top Drawer Property Solutions, LLC, Appellants

v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI17915 Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice In this appeal, opposing parties filed notices of appeal. Appellants’ brief is due on September 16, 2021. Before the due date, the parties filed a joint motion asking this court to adopt their proposed briefing schedule and to increase the parties’ respective aggregate word counts to 37,500 words. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.4(i)(2). The parties’ joint motion is GRANTED. The applicable aggregate word count will be 37,500 words—to accommodate an opening brief, a response brief, and a reply brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.4(i). The briefs must comply with all other length and content requirements established by the applicable Rules. E.g. , T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.4(i), 38.1, 38.2, 38.3. The parties will submit their briefs according to the following schedule: Due Date Documents September 16, 2021 Appellant’s opening brief October 18, 2021 Appellee’s opening/response briefNovember 17, 2021 Appellant’s response/reply brief

December 7, 2021 Appellee’s reply brief Any additional request for an extension of time to file a brief is discouraged. See, e.g. , T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
. . NORTHWEST 

COMbY.!~ PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL PLANNING 

AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Pennsylvania Local Development District 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

__ Wail:Ungton, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Deva-ny: 

I am writing you to request your support of the proposal submitted by Silver Airway, Dba 

United Express to provide air service, under the Essential Air Service Program, to 

Franklin/Oil City (FKL) Pennsylvania. 

The region is experiencing the beginnings of a trend in business development 

and the opportunitie,§"(lvailable from the shale industry _ are just starting in the 

region. The availabilityOf'airservice connectivity is r the economic revival 

currently underway. The com~bntty,.,i(ld business leaders will to work with the 

air carrier to improve enplanements and hlitig~t~ the carrier's financia 

fJ()SSible; ::::.:.·. i : : .. ; ;, ,,, ·;,,, 

I would humbly request that·you consider the proposal from SIIVeiF~llr:\1 

under the Essential Air Service progrant:·,. 

Susan M. Smith 

Manager, Regional Planning 

'':f' .'.··i! . 

. l j : : : - • ~ • ':~ i :- . . 

...... (". : i' . :; . ~ :; . '' .. ·
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3580 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3580

To require the Corps of Engineers to preserve the historical integrity 
of Zoar, Ohio, while carrying out any study relating to or construction 
  of flood damage reduction measures, including levees, in Zoar, Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2012

    Mr. Brown of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Portman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Corps of Engineers to preserve the historical integrity 
of Zoar, Ohio, while carrying out any study relating to or construction 
  of flood damage reduction measures, including levees, in Zoar, Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDITIONS RELATING TO FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES IN 
              ZOAR, OHIO.

    The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 
shall preserve in place, consistent with the Standards for Preservation 
and Guidelines for Preserving Historic Buildings, published by the 
Secretary of the Interior, the historical integrity of Zoar, Ohio, 
while carrying out any study relating to or construction of flood 
damage reduction measures, including levees, in Zoar, Ohio.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6694

DAVID KENNETH FOWLER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK L. PERRY, substituted for State of North Carolina , Respondent

- Appellee ,

and
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00302

- FDW )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. David Kenneth Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: David Kenneth Fowler seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonab le jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on
p rocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fowler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Proceedings of the National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, June 3-4, 1993, Herndon, Virginia      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Daniel ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1154

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**


**SECTION
      1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of XrayMedia, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hans Johannes Schulte,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of XrayMedia, Inc and a member of the
      Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 9, 2005         Signature: /s/  Hans
      Johannes Schulte


Hans Johannes Schulte


Chief Financial Officer





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**


**SECTION
      1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of XrayMedia, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hans Johannes Schulte,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of XrayMedia, Inc and a member of the
      Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 9, 2005         Signature: /s/  Hans
      Johannes Schulte


Hans
      Johannes Schulte


Chief Executive Officer
Case 20-10981-AJC Doc 2 Filed 01/24/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-10981-AJC Doc 2 Filed 01/24/20 Page 2 of 2
Thomas JAMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2507

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
srsecurednoteamend.htm





 





  








EXHIBIT 4.2


AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO


GREEN BALLAST, INC.


8% SENIOR SECURED NOTE


 

 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4, dated as of February 29, 2012 (the “Amendment”), to the 8% Senior Secured Note, dated as of April 15, 2011, as amended from time to time (the “GBL Note”), by Green Ballast, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company issued the GBL Note to Green Ballast LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company (the “Holder”) on April 15, 2011; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to enter into this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and agreed, the Company and the Holder agree as follows:


    



	 	1.  Section 6(a)(vi) of the GBL Note is hereby amended by deleting Section 6(a)(vi) in its entirety and replacing it with the following:





 


vi.           if at any time after April 1, 2012, the Common Stock shall not be eligible for listing or quotation for trading on a Trading Market and shall not be eligible to resume listing or quotation for trading thereon within five (5) Trading Days, or the Company fails to use its best efforts to cause the Common Stock to be listed or quoted on a Trading Market after April 1, 2012; provided however, that in the event the Company (i) files an S-1 to register for resale the Holder’s Common Stock (including the Conversion Shares issuable upon conversion thereof) and (ii) reasonably diligently responds to comments from the Commission or otherwise uses its best efforts to seek effectiveness of the S-1, the Company shall not be deemed to be in default or breach of this Note if the Commission fails to declare the S-1 effective by February 1, 2012, thereby causing to delay or prevent the Common Stock from becoming eligible for listing or quotation for trading on a Trading Market;




 



	 	2. Except to the extent amended hereby, the GBL Note shall remain in full force and effect.
	 	 
	 	3. All capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings given to such terms in the GBL Note.
	 	 
	 	4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original document.  Electronic signatures, whether by fax, e-mail, or other electronic means, shall be treated as original signatures.





 


 


 


 







 


[Signature page to follow.]


 






 


  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first set forth above.



 


 



	 	COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	GREEN BALLAST, INC.





 


 



	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin Adams  






	 	Name:	Kevin Adams
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer





 



 


 


 



	 	
HOLDER:


	 	 
	 	
GREEN BALLAST LLC







 


 



	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin Adams






	 	Name:	Kevin Adams
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer





 









 


2
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

▲▲ ★

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/21

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

■ ★ ■

■ ■

★

■

■

■

■

● ★

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
EX-10.9




 EXHIBIT 10.9 
 Gray Television, Inc. 
 Description of Annual Incentive Plan Structure

 The Management Personnel Committee of the board of directors of the Company, operating as the compensation committee, has
established certain annual cash incentive opportunities for the Company’s executive officers. The target opportunities are based on the achievement of certain performance metrics, and have been established as a percentage of each executive
officer’s base salary, with such target opportunities for each of Messrs. Howell, Jr., Prather, Jr., Ryan and Beizer being 60%, 35%, 30% and 30% of each individual’s base salary, respectively. 

For the year ending December 31, 2011, the Committee established threshold (minimum), target and maximum levels of performance for
each metric, with a weighting of the total incentive opportunity assigned to each of the metrics as follows: (i) 25% for revenue, (ii) 25% for “net operating profit” (calculated as net revenue less broadcast expense and corporate
and administrative expense) and (iii) 50% for broadcast cash flow (as defined in the Non-GAAP reconciliations published by the Company). Target performance goals were developed based on internal company budgets and forecasts. If actual Company
performance for any of the metrics above is less than 95% of the “target” amount of such metrics, no payment will be made for that metric. If actual performance is between 95% and 100% of target performance, awards will be paid on a scale
of 50% to 100% of each executive officer’s target opportunity. If actual performance exceeds 100% and is less than or equal to 110% of target performance, awards will be payable on a scale from 100% to 150% of an executive officer’s target
opportunity, in each case based on linear interpolation of actual results. The maximum award payable for any single metric is 150% of an executive officer’s target opportunity for that metric. If the threshold measure is not achieved, then no
payment will be made for the associated metric. 
 The Committee will review performance at the conclusion of the fiscal year
and determine actual incentive payments earned.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           From Projectile Points to Microprocessors - The Influence of Some Industrial Minerals      

      October 17, 2007    

In the language of economic geology, Earth materials are classified as metallic ores, fuel minerals, gemstones, and industrial minerals. Most people know that metallic ores yield shiny, conductive, ductile elements such as copper, iron, or gold. Most understand that energy-producing coals constitute a fuel mineral. Likewise, dazzling rubies and rare sapphires are universally recognized as gemstones. The fourth group, industrial minerals, is largely unknown to the general public, even though industrial minerals are as essential to daily life as metals and fuel minerals. This report examines the occurrence and practical uses of nine important industrial minerals - constituting just a few of the more than 50 industrial minerals that shape human culture.

## Citation Information
Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Brian BISHOP and Mark Detrio, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4015

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10501]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 421

[BPO-083-F]
RIN 0938-AF84


Medicare Program; Revisions to Criteria and Standards for 
Evaluating Intermediaries and Carriers

CFR Correction

    In title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 400 to 429, 
revised as of October 1, 1994, on page 617, Sec. 421.120 was 
inadvertently omitted. The section should have appeared as set forth 
below:


Sec. 421.120  Performance criteria.

    (a) Application of performance criteria. As part of the 
intermediary evaluations authorized by section 1816(f) of the Act, HCFA 
periodically assesses the performance of intermediaries in their 
Medicare operations using performance criteria. The criteria measure 
and evaluate intermediary performance of functional responsibilities 
such as--
    (1) Correct coverage and payment determinations;
    (2) Responsiveness to beneficiary concerns; and
    (3) Proper management of administrative funds.
    (b) Basis for criteria. HCFA will base the performance criteria 
on--
    (1) Nationwide intermediary experience;
    (2) Changes in intermediary operations due to fiscal constraints; 
and
    (3) HFCA's objectives in achieving better performance.
    (c) Publication of criteria. The development and revision of 
criteria for evaluating intermediary performance is a continuing 
process. Therefore, before the beginning of each evaluation period, 
HCFA will publish the performance criteria as a notice in the Federal 
Register.

[48 FR 7178, Feb. 18, 1983]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Lynch  Interactive
Corporation  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Mario
J.  Gabelli,  as Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                            /s/ Mario J. Gabelli
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Mario J. Gabelli
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 14, 2004