alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

The National Endowment for the Humanities, National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Thursday, May 14, 2009.

The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after July 1, 2009.

Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the Committee.

It is suggested that those desiring more specific information contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Michael P. McDonald, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/606-8322.

Michael P. McDonald,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-9862 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 00-814

GILDA E. LEVI, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before FARLEY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges.

O R D E R

On October 23, 2001, in a single-judge order, the Court dismissed the appeal of the April 13,

2000, Board of Veterans' Appeals decision after the appellant, through counsel, filed a memorandum

in which she withdrew her appeal as to all claims, except a claim of clear and unmistakable error in

a February 1958 VA regional office decision over which this Court lacked jurisdiction. On

November 14, 2001, the Court received an out-of-time motion for a panel decision. On

November 26, 2001, the appellant filed a motion to direct the Clerk to accept for filing the motion

for a panel decision. The Court will construe this motion as a motion for leave to file the motion for

a panel decision out of time. 

On January 4, 2002, this Court received the appellant's Notice of Appeal (NOA) to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit). Although the appellant purports

that her NOA is "conditioned" on this Court ruling unfavorably on her two pending motions, such

a "conditional" NOA is not contemplated by the Court's rules. 

Because the filing of the NOA seeking review in the Federal Circuit deprives this Court of

jurisdiction over this case, see Sumner v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 404 (2002) (en banc order)

(dismissing for lack of jurisdiction motion for en banc reconsideration after receiving notice of filing

of NOA to Federal Circuit); Villamor v. West, 11 Vet.App. 193 (1998) (en banc order); see also

Cerullo v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 195, 196 (1991) ("filing of an NOA confers plenary jurisdiction

upon an appellate court"), the Court does not have jurisdiction to review the appellant's untimely

motion for a panel decision or motion for leave. The Court does, of course, have jurisdiction to

decide its own jurisdiction. See Kelsey v. West, 13 Vet.App. 437 (2000) (per curiam order); Marsh

v. West, 11 Vet.App. 468, 469 (1998); Smith (Irma) v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 330, 332 (1997).
2

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant's motions are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

DATED: April 16, 2002 PER CURIAM.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Parasite transmission in social interacting hosts: Monogenean epidemics in guppies      

      December 2, 2011    

### Background

Infection incidence increases with the average number of contacts between susceptible and infected individuals. Contact rates are normally assumed to increase linearly with host density. However, social species seek out each other at low density and saturate their contact rates at high densities. Although predicting epidemic behaviour requires knowing how contact rates scale with host density, few empirical studies have investigated the effect of host density. Also, most theory assumes each host has an equal probability of transmitting parasites, even though individual parasite load and infection duration can vary. To our knowledge, the relative importance of characteristics of the primary infected host vs. the susceptible population has never been tested experimentally.

### Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we examine epidemics using a common ectoparasite, Gyrodactylus turnbulli infecting its guppy host (Poecilia reticulata). Hosts were maintained at different densities (3, 6, 12 and 24 fish in 40 L aquaria), and we monitored gyrodactylids both at a population and individual host level. Although parasite population size increased with host density, the probability of an epidemic did not. Epidemics were more likely when the primary infected fish had a high mean intensity and duration of infection. Epidemics only occurred if the primary infected host experienced more than 23 worm days. Female guppies contracted infections sooner than males, probably because females have a higher propensity for shoaling.

### Conclusions/Significance

These findings suggest that in social hosts like guppies, the frequency of social contact largely governs disease epidemics independent of host density.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kevin Lafferty

##### Senior Ecologist, ST

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

klafferty@usgs.gov

805-893-8778

## Related Content

#### Kevin Lafferty

##### Senior Ecologist, ST

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

klafferty@usgs.gov

805-893-8778

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40512]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44305

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

CHRISTOPHER LYNN WIRFS ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 420

Filed: March 29, 2017
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood , District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty

- five years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for felony aggravated battery as enhanced by use of a deadly weapon in the commi ssion of a crime, and a sentence of five years determinate
, to run consecutively
, for felony stalking in the first degree, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford
, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; MELANSON, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM Christopher Lynn Wirfs pleaded guilty to felony aggravated battery , Idaho Code § § 18

- 903(a), 907(a), 907(b), as enhanced by felony use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a crime, I.C. § 19

- 2520, and felony stalking in the first degree, I.C. § 18

- 3316 . The district court imposed a unified twenty

- five year sentence, with five years determinate, and a consecutive
determinate five

- year sentence respectiv ely

. Wirfs appeals, contending that his sentence is
excessive.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct . App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Wirfs ’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Selected hydrologic data for farmland treated with sewage sludge near Platteville, Colorado, 1985-91      

      January 1, 1991    

View Report

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District, studied the ground-water-quality effects of the application of anaerobic digested municipal sewage sludge at agronomic rates to farmland near Platteville. Beginning in the fall of 1985, the sludge was injected annually into the sandy farmland in a 1-square-mile area. Generally, water-quality samples were collected from observation wells two or three times during each irrigation season from 1985 through 1990 and once each winter or late spring from 1987 through early 1991. 

Water levels were measured, and water-quality, soil and soil-moisture samples, and precipitation data were collected at selected sites throughout the study area. This report presents the data collected during 1985-91 from observation wells, irrigation wells, domestic wells, and other selected sites in the study area.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Sensitivity of water resources in the Delaware River basin to climate variability and change      

      January 1, 1994    

Because of the greenhouse effect, projected increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels might cause global warming, which in turn could result in changes in precipitation patterns and evapotranspiration and in increases in sea level. This report describes the greenhouse effect; discusses the problems and uncertainties associated with the detection, prediction, and effects of climate change; and presents the results of sensitivity analyses of how climate change might affect water resources in the Delaware River basin.

Sensitivity analyses suggest that potentially serious shortfalls of certain water resources in the basin could result if some scenarios for climate change come true . The results of model simulations of the basin streamflow demonstrate the difficulty in distinguishing the effects that climate change versus natural climate variability have on streamflow and water supply . The future direction of basin changes in most water resources, furthermore, cannot be precisely determined because of uncertainty in current projections of regional temperature and precipitation . This large uncertainty indicates that, for resource planning, information defining the sensitivities of water resources to a range of climate change is most relevant . The sensitivity analyses could be useful in developing contingency plans for evaluating and responding to changes, should they occur.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David M Wolock, Ph.D.

##### Hydrologist (Research)

Water Resources Mission Area

dwolock@usgs.gov

785-832-3528

## Related Content

#### David M Wolock, Ph.D.

##### Hydrologist (Research)

Water Resources Mission Area

dwolock@usgs.gov

785-832-3528

### Contacts

#### David M Wolock, Ph.D.

##### Hydrologist (Research)

Water Resources Mission Area

dwolock@usgs.gov

785-832-3528

### Explore Search

                  - Water

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Precipitation isotopes link regional climate patterns to water supply in a tropical mountain forest, eastern Puerto Rico      

      July 29, 2014    

Like many mountainous areas in the tropics, watersheds in the Luquillo Mountains of eastern Puerto Rico have abundant rainfall and stream discharge and provide much of the water supply for the densely populated metropolitan areas nearby. Projected changes in regional temperature and atmospheric dynamics as a result of global warming suggest that water availability will be affected by changes in rainfall patterns. It is essential to understand the relative importance of different weather systems to water supply to determine how changes in rainfall patterns, interacting with geology and vegetation, will affect the water balance. To help determine the links between climate and water availability, stable isotope signatures of precipitation from different weather systems were established to identify those that are most important in maintaining streamflow and groundwater recharge. Precipitation stable isotope values in the Luquillo Mountains had a large range, from fog/cloud water with δ2H, δ18O values as high as +12 ‰, −0.73 ‰ to tropical storm rain with values as low as −127 ‰, −16.8 ‰. Temporal isotope values exhibit a reverse seasonality from those observed in higher latitude continental watersheds, with higher isotopic values in the winter and lower values in the summer. Despite the higher volume of convective and low-pressure system rainfall, stable isotope analyses indicated that under the current rainfall regime, frequent trade -wind orographic showers contribute much of the groundwater recharge and stream base flow. Analysis of rain events using 20 years of 15 -minute resolution data at a mountain station (643 m) showed an increasing trend in rainfall amount, in agreement with increased precipitable water in the atmosphere, but differing from climate model projections of drying in the region. The mean intensity of rain events also showed an increasing trend. The determination of recharge sources from stable isotope tracers indicates that water supply will be affected if regional atmospheric dynamics change trade- wind orographic rainfall patterns in the Caribbean.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Martha A Scholl

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

mascholl@usgs.gov

703-648-5890

#### Sheila Murphy

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

sfmurphy@usgs.gov

303-541-3023

## Related Content

#### Martha A Scholl

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

mascholl@usgs.gov

703-648-5890

#### Sheila Murphy

##### Research Hydrologist

Water Resources Mission Area

sfmurphy@usgs.gov

303-541-3023

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Puerto Rico
                  - Luquillo Mountains

View All **
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6362** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTWANE JAMALE JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 7:07

- cr - 00043

- D

- 1 ; 7:12

- cv - 00001

- D )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in p art and a ffirmed in p art by un published per curiam opinion
.
Antwane Jamale Johnson , Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West , Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Shailika S. Kotiya , Timothy Severo , Augustus D. Willis , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antwane Jamale Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion s and denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) . The orders addressing § 2255 are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealab ility. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisone r satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 33 6

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
W e have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and3 dismiss the appeal as to the § 2255 motion and deni al of the Rule 59(e) motion
. As to the 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson , No s . 7:07

- cr - 00043

- D

1 ; 7:12

- cv - 00001

- D ( E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2013 ; Jan. 16, 2014 ) We deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART ; AFFIRMED IN PART
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

27948

Vol. 61, No. 107

Monday, June 3, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 651

[I.D. 052196A]

Northeast Multispecies Fishery;

Amendment 7; Resubmission of the

Measure for the Nonregulated Species

Permit Category

Correction

Proposed rule document 96-13341

was inadvertently published in the

Rules and Regulations section of the

issue of Wednesday, May 29, 1996,

beginning on page 26847. It should have

appeared in the Proposed Rules section.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs

Administration

49 CFR Part 107

[Docket No. HM-207C, Amdt. Nos. 107-38,

171-141, 173-249, and 178-113]

RIN 2137-AC63

Exemption, Approval, Registration and

Reporting Procedures; Miscellaneous

Provisions

Correction

In rule document 96–11400 beginning

on page 21084 in the issue of Thursday,

May 9, 1996, make the following

correction:

§ 107.701 [Corrected]

On page 21100, in the first column, in

§ 107.701, the first paragraph should be

designated ‘‘(a)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Exhibit
3.3
 
 RESOLUTION
TO ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE BYLAWS OF BIG CAT ENERGY CORPORATION:
 
 RESOLVED that an amendment to the
Bylaws of the Company is approved and adopted in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A, the purpose of the amendment being to change the name of the Company
on the bylaws to conform with the name change in the Articles of Incorporation,
to amend and restate Article II, Section 3 of the Bylaws in its entirety, and to
authorize a complete amendment and restatement of the Bylaws to incorporate the
foregoing changes into the Bylaws as an integrated document.













































Exhibit
A:





AMENDMENT
NUMBER ONE TO THE BYLAWS


OF BIG
CAT ENERGY CORPORATION





The Board
of Directors of Big Cat Energy Corporation (the “Company”) adopted the following
amendments to the Bylaws of the Company on July 27, 2009:





1.
            The
      name of the Company having previously been changed to Big Cat Energy
      Corporation by a vote of the stockholders, the title of the Bylaws is
      hereby amended to read:





BYLAWS


OF


BIG CAT
ENERGY CORPORATION


A Nevada
Corporation





2.
            Article
      II, Section 3 of the Bylaws is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
      to read as follows:





Section
3. SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the shareholders may be called at any
time by the Board of Directors, by the Chair of the Board, or by the
President.   If a special meeting is called by anyone other than
the Board of Directors, the person or persons calling the meeting shall make a
request in writing, delivered personally or sent by registered mail or by
telegraphic or other facsimile transmission, to the Chair of the Board or to the
President, specifying the proposed time and date of the meeting and the general
nature of the business proposed to be transacted.  Within 30 days
after receipt, the officer receiving the request shall cause notice to be given
to the shareholders entitled to vote, in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 4 and 5 of this Article II, stating that a meeting will be held at the
time requested by the person(s) calling the meeting, and stating the general
nature of the business proposed to be transacted. The date of the proposed
meeting may be postponed or delayed, if necessary, in order to complete filings
of proxy or information statements with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.   If notice is not given within 30 days after receipt
of the request (or such longer time as necessitated for regulatory review), the
person or persons requesting the meeting may give the
notice.   Nothing contained in this paragraph shall be construed
as limiting, fixing, or affecting the time when a meeting of shareholders called
by action of the Board may be held.





3.
            These
      Bylaws may be amended and restated in their entirety to incorporate the
      foregoing changes into the official Bylaws of the
  Company.








RICHARD 
STIFEL


Richard
G. Stifel, Secretary
Abdule Rashene LEWIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.