alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.
 /s/ D. Michael KramerD. Michael KramerPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Director and acting Chief Financial Officer August 14, 2007
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4768 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature 

of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory 

and regulatory provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4768 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Separation of Powers 

3 Restoration Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATUTORY AND REGU5 LATORY INTERPRETATIONS. 

6 Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘To the extent necessary’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘(a) To the extent necessary’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘decide all relevant questions of 

11 law, interpret constitutional and statutory provi12 sions, and’’; 

13 (3) by inserting after ‘‘of the terms of an agen14 cy action’’ the following ‘‘and decide de novo all rel15 evant questions of law, including the interpretation 

16 of constitutional and statutory provisions, and rules 

17 made by agencies. Notwithstanding any other provi18 sion of law, this subsection shall apply in any action 

19 for judicial review of agency action authorized under 

20 any provision of law. No law may exempt any such 

21 civil action from the application of this section ex22 cept by specific reference to this section’’; and 

23 (4) by striking ‘‘The reviewing court shall—’’ 

24 and inserting the following: 
3 

•HR 4768 EH

1 ‘‘(b) The reviewing court shall—’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4768 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the 

tions of statutory and regulatory provisions. nature of judicial review of agency interpreta-
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: May 1982      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The progressive lag of sediment concentration with flood waves      

      November 11, 1956    

                            - Numerous investigations of suspended‐sediment discharge have shown that an increase in stream flow usually is accompanied by an increase in sediment concentration. The sediment‐concentration peak during a rise may precede, coincide with, or follow the water‐discharge peak. Observations on the Bighorn River in Wyoming and Montana show a progressive lag in peak concentration behind peak flow. The lag is most apparent when a single storm produces a flood wave that starts many miles upstream from the sampling sections.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Bighorn River
                  - Montana
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 20-10695-RAM Doc 21 Filed 04/01/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-10695-RAM Doc 21 Filed 04/01/20 Page 2 of 2
No. 14790 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1979 

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF 

BARBARA ANN ROBINSON, 

Petitioner and Respondent, 

and 

WILLIAM HENRY ROBINSON, JR., 

Respondent and Appellant. 

Appeal from: District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, 

Honorable Nat Allen, Judge presiding. 

Counsel of Record: 

For Appellant: 

Ralph L. Herriott, Billings, Montana 

For Respondent: 

Tolliver, Guthals and Wright, Billings, Montana 

Filed: 

FEE 82 19i' 

- 

Submitted on briefs: November 7, 1979 

Decided : FE6 2 1 1m 

Clerk 
Mr. Justice Daniel J. Shea delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

The husband appeals from that portion of a marriage dissolution 

decree entered by the Yellowstone County District Court involving 

the distribution of property. He contends that the trial court 

failed to enter legally sufficient findings in support of the 

ultimate conclusions and judgment, and that in any event, the 

trial court abused its discretion in awarding certain property to 

the wife. We agree that this case must be remanded because of the 

failure to enter legally sufficient findings of fact. 

In apportioning the property the trial court awarded the wife 

what appears to be a one-half interest in the equity built up in a 

home which was acquired by the husband before he married his wife 

for the second time. The husband had purchased the home after the 

first marriage dissolution so that he would have a home for himself 

and the minor child born of the first marriage. Without entering 

findings to support its conclusion, the trial court simply awarded 

the wife $3,000 as her interest in the home, and, inter alia, entered 

judgment for that amount. This Court has previously set forth the 

requirements of section 40-4-202, MCA, in the cases of In Re 

Marriage of Johnsrud (19771, Mont . , 572 P.2d 902, 907, 

34 St.Rep. 1417, 1423 and In Re Marriage of Reilly (1978), 

Mont . , 577 P.2d 840, 842, 35 St.Rep. 451, 454, and no additional 

cases should have to be cited. Suffice it to say that the findings, 

measured by these requirements are manifestly deficient. 

The wife does not dispute that the husband acquired the home 

after the dissolution of the first divorce and before the parties 

married for the second time. Neither statute nor case law declare 

that a party is automatically entitled to a portion of the property 

acquired before marriage or to a percentage of the value of the 

property. There are absolutely no findings indicating that the 

trial court considered and applied the relevant factors enumerated 

in section 40-4-202 (I), MCA. 

-2- 
The husband testified that the equity in the home at the 

time of dissolution was between $6,000 and $7,000. However, 

without the required findings we cannot tell how or why the trial 

court arrived at the apportionment of the marital estate in this 

case. The lack of findings is similarly deficient as to the 

personal property distributed by the trial court. 

Accordingly, the judgment is vacated and this case is remanded 

to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with 

this opinion. 

Justice 

We Concur: 

Chief Justice 

A'
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 51835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-31003]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-570-808]


Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the People's Republic of China; Final 
Results of Antidumping Administrative Review

Correction

    In notice document 95-23334 beginning on page 48687 in the issue of 
Wednesday, September 20, 1995, in the first column, under EFFECTIVE 
DATE, ``October 20, 1995.'' should read ``September 20, 1995.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Section 906Certification**

**(pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

----

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,2005 of AIXTRON Aktiengesellschaft (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on or about the datehereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned, in the capacity set forth below, hereby certifies, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

(1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                                            |       |                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/    PAUL HYLAND     |
| Name:                                      | ** ** | **Paul  Hyland**                                          |
| Title:                                     | ** ** | **President  and Chief Executive Officer**                |
|                                       |       |                                                      |
| /s/    WOLFGANG  BREME |
| Name:                                      | ** ** | **Wolfgang  Breme**                                       |
| Title:                                     | ** ** | **Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |
|                                            |            |                                                           |  |  |

 

Date:  June 22, 2006

*Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting each of the signatures appearing in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company in accordance with theapplicable provisions of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and the related rules and regulations.*

*Thiswritten statement accompanies the Annual Report on Form 20-F inwhich it appears as an Exhibit pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S.Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theU.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other applicable law, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.*

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Sensitivity of species habitat-relationship model performance to factors of scale      

      January 1, 2000    

Researchers have come to different conclusions about the usefulness of habitat-relationship models for predicting species presence or absence. This difference frequently stems from a failure to recognize the effects of spatial scales at which the models are applied. We examined the effects of model complexity, spatial data resolution, and scale of application on the performance of bird habitat relationship (BHR) models on the Craig Mountain Wildlife Management Area and on the Idaho portion of the U.S. Forest Service's Northern Region. We constructed and tested BHR models for 60 bird species detected on the study areas. The models varied by three levels of complexity (amount of habitat information) and three spatial data resolutions (0.09 ha, 4 ha, 10 ha). We tested these models at two levels of analysis: the site level (a homogeneous area <0.5 ha) and cover-type level (an aggregation of many similar sites of a similar land-cover type), using correspondence between model predictions and species detections to calculate kappa coefficients of agreement. Model performance initially increased as models became more complex until a point was reached where omission errors increased at a rate greater than the rate at which commission errors were decreasing. Heterogeneity of the study areas appeared to influence the effect of model complexity. Changes in model complexity resulted in a greater decrease in commission error than increase in omission error. The effect of Spatial data resolution on the performance of BHR models was influenced by the variability of the study area. BHR models performed better at cover-type levels of analysis than at the site level for both study areas. Correct-presence estimates (1 - minus percentage omission error) decreased slightly as number of species detections increased on each study area. Correct-absence estimates (1 - percentage commission error) increased as number of species detections increased on each study area. This suggests that a large number of detections may be necessary to achieve reliable estimates of model accuracy.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Craig Mountain Wildlife Management Area
                  -  U.S. Forest Service's Northern Region
                  - Idaho

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Reducing loss of life and property from disasters: A societal benefit area of the strategic plan for U.S. Integrated Earth Observation System (IEOS)      

      May 30, 2007    

Natural and technological disasters, such as hurricanes and other extreme weather events, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides and debris flows, wildland and urban-interface fires, floods, oil spills, and space-weather storms, impose a significant burden on society. Throughout the United States, disasters inflict many injuries and deaths, and cost the nation $20 billion each year (SDR, 2003). Disasters in other countries can affect U.S. assets and interests overseas (e.g. the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines, which effectively destroyed Clark Air Force Base). Also, because they have a disproportionate impact on developing countries, disasters are major barriers to sustainable development. Improving our ability to assess, predict, monitor, and respond to hazardous events is a key factor in reducing the occurrence and severity of disasters, and relies heavily on the use of information from well-designed and integrated Earth observation systems. To fully realize the benefits gained from the observation systems, the information derived must be disseminated through effective warning systems and networks, with products tailored to the needs of the end users and the general public.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Rosalind Tuthill  Helz, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

rhelz@usgs.gov

703-648-6086

## Related Content

#### Rosalind Tuthill  Helz, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

rhelz@usgs.gov

703-648-6086

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70224]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Our
report on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of CardioGenics
Holdings Inc. as of October 31, 2009 and for the year then ended and on the
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for the period from November 20, 1997 (date of inception) to
October  31, 2009, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended October  31, 2009, is dated February
12, 2010. We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
following registration statement previously filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933: the
registration statement on Form S-8 with SEC file No. 333-137162.





/s/ J.H.
Cohn LLP





Roseland,
New Jersey





February
12, 2010
Case Number:

Case Name:

Period Ending:

20-16806 RAM 

Miami NDT Inc

03/31/22

SONEET R. KAPILA, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

09/29/21 (c)

11/15/21

12/17/21

Trustee:

Filed (f) or Converted (c):

D0HHWLQJ'DWH

Claims Bar Date:

Ref #

1

Asset Description

(Scheduled And Unscheduled (u) Property)

2

Petition/

Unscheduled

Values

3

Estimated Net Value

(Value Determined By Trustee,

Less Liens, Exemptions,

and Other Costs)

4

Property

Abandoned

2$ D$EDQGRQ

5

Sale/Funds

Received by

the Estate

6

Asset Fully

Administered (FA)/

Gross Value of

Remaining Assets

1 Domain www.miamindt.aero Unknown 0.00 0.00 FA 

2 Customer list 0.00 0.00 0.00 FA 

3 FAA License 750,000.00 Unknown 0.00 Unknown

4 East West Bank account (u)

CLOSEOUT OF CHAPTER 11 ACCOUNT

0.00 1,506.24 1,506.24 FA 

TOTALS (Excluding Unknown Values) $750,000.00 $1,506.24 $1,506.24 $0.00

Major activities affecting case closing:

CBD: 12/17/21

TAX RETURN STATUS: NONE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME

CASE STATUS: THIS CASE CONVERTED FROM A CHAPTER 11. IT IS JOINLY ADMINISTERED WITH SEVEN OTHER RELATED CASES. THE TRUSTEE HIRED DREW DILLWORTH, ESQ. TO 

REPRESENT THE ESTATE.

Initial Projected Date of Final Report (TFR): March 31, 2024 Current Projected Date of Final Report (TFR): March 31, 2024

FORM 1

INDIVIDUAL ESTATE PROPERTY RECORD AND REPORT

ASSET CASES

Page: 1

Case 20-16806-RAM Doc 34 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 2
Case Number: 20-16806 RAM Trustee: SONEET R. KAPILA, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

Case Name: Miami NDT Inc Bank Name: Signature Bank

Account: ******2549 - Checking

Taxpayer ID#: ******3209 Blanket Bond: $53,950,000.00 (per case limit)

Period: 04/01/21 - 03/31/22 Separate Bond: N/A

1

Trans.

Date

2

Check or

Ref. #

3

Paid To / Received From

4

Description of Transaction

Uniform

Tran. Code

5

Receipts

$

 6

Disbursements

$

7

Checking

Account Balance

10/13/21 Asset #4 EAST WEST BANK CASHIERS 

CHECK

CLOSEOUT OF CHAPTER 11 ACCOUNT 1290-010 1,506.24 1,506.24

10/29/21 Signature Bank Bank and Technology Services Fee 2600-000 5.00 1,501.24

11/30/21 Signature Bank Bank and Technology Services Fee 2600-000 5.00 1,496.24

12/31/21 Signature Bank Bank and Technology Services Fee 2600-000 5.00 1,491.24

01/31/22 Signature Bank Bank and Technology Services Fee 2600-000 5.00 1,486.24

02/28/22 Signature Bank Bank and Technology Services Fee 2600-000 5.00 1,481.24

03/31/22 Signature Bank Bank and Technology Services Fee 2600-000 5.00 1,476.24

ACCOUNT TOTALS 

Less: Bank Transfers

1,506.24

0.00

30.00

0.00

$1,476.24

Subtotal

Less: Payment to Debtors

1,506.24 30.00

0.00

NET Receipts / Disbursements $1,506.24 $30.00

TOTAL - ALL ACCOUNTS

Net

Receipts

Net

Disbursements

Account

Balances

Checking # ******2549 1,506.24 30.00 1,476.24

$1,506.24 $30.00 $1,476.24

Net Receipts: $1,506.24

Net Estate: $1,506.24

Form 2

Cash Receipts and Disbursements Record

Page: 1

Case 20-16806-RAM Doc 34 Filed 04/27/22 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32



The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release
No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 27, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:August 11, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
ended June 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:August 11, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.