alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005011EN.01002901.xml

| 14.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/29

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 December 2004

appointing an Austrian member of the Economic and Social Committee

(2005/19/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 259 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Decision 2002/758/EC, Euratom of 17 September 2002 appointing the members of the Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2002 to 20 September 2006 (1),

| | |
| --- | --- |

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Austrian Government,

Having obtained the opinion of the Commission of the European Union,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Hans KLETZMAYR is hereby appointed a member of the Economic and Social Committee in place of Mr Rudolf STRASSER for the remainder of the latter's term of office, which runs until 20 September 2006.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

C. VEERMAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 253, 21.9.2002, p. 9.

1

---
Dondre Devonte ROLFE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4768 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4768

  To amend title 5, United States Code, with respect to the judicial 
     review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory 
                              provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

 Mr. Ratcliffe (for himself, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Marino, Mr. Chaffetz, 
 Mr. Buck, Mr. Yoho, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Byrne, Mr. Brat, Mrs. Love, 
   Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Babin, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. 
 Rouzer, Mr. Bishop of Michigan, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Messer, Mr. Mulvaney, 
Mr. Labrador, Mr. Trott, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. DeSantis, Mr. 
 Loudermilk, Mr. Issa, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Culberson, Mrs. 
  Lummis, Mr. Walker, Mr. Olson, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Kelly of 
 Pennsylvania, Mr. Renacci, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Gosar, 
 Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Graves of Georgia, 
 Mr. Chabot, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Griffith, and 
 Mr. Smith of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, with respect to the judicial 
     review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory 
                              provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Separation of Powers Restoration Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATUTORY AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS.

    Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amended, in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``all relevant questions of 
law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions'' and inserting 
``de novo all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation 
of constitutional and statutory provisions and rules''.
                                 <all>
```
IC 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3667 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 30, 2012 

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

AN ACT 

To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 as the Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

S 3667 RFH

1 SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA. 

2 The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the 

3 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN MARRIED INDIVIDUALS’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA’’. 

Passed the Senate December 27, 2012. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Carolyn JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 31, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00310

- CV

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

$71,404.00 U.S. Currency, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUST ICE ROSE, JUSTICES T RIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on A pril 11, 2019

. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. A ppellant shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Map showing surface materials, District of Columbia      

      January 1, 1975    

View Document

View Plate

U.S. Geological Survey

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - District of Columbia

View All **
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TX MEDICAL OFFICE, LP,

FL MEDICAL OFFICE, LLC,

CA MEDICAL OFFICE, LP, AND

MOB PORTFOLIO ASSOCIATES, LLC,

 Appellants,

v.

TENET HEALTH SYSTEM 

HOSPITALS, INC.

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00263-CV

Appeal from

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2010-1628)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion to dispose of the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We 

therefore vacate the trial court’s judgment, dismiss the case, and render judgment effectuating 

the parties’ settlement agreement in that all claims, counterclaims, or causes of action as to the 

“Alvarado Medical Plaza II” site are dismissed without prejudice and all remaining claims, 

counterclaims, or causes of action are dismissed with prejudice. We further order costs be 

assessed against the party incurring same. We further order that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3666 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to modify the definition of ‘‘exhibitor’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2012 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 

read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to modify the definition 

of ‘‘exhibitor’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANIMAL WELFARE. 

4 Section 2(h) of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 

5 2132(h)) is amended by adding ‘‘an owner of a common, 

6 domesticated household pet who derives less than a sub7 stantial portion of income from a nonprimary source (as 

8 determined by the Secretary) for exhibiting an animal that 

9 exclusively resides at the residence of the pet owner,’’ after 

10 ‘‘stores,’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
The RELATED GROUP, (f/k/a The Related Group of Florida), Related Florida, Inc., TRG-FT. Myers, Inc., and TRG Oasis (Tower One), Ltd., Petitioners, v. OASIS TOWER ONE CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.; Wolfberg/Alvarez and Partners, Inc.; CHM Structural Engineers, LLC ; BBL-Florida, LLC; Acres & Son Plumbing, Inc.; Allen Concrete & Masonry, Inc.; Advance Water Technology, Corp. ; C.L.W. Concrete Construction, Inc.; CMC Steel Fabricators d/b/a CMC Rebar Florida; Coastal Fire Protection, Inc.; Distinctive Finishes, L.L.C.; IBA Consultants, Inc.; Lopez Brothers Masonry, Inc. ; MCW Acquisition, LLC d/b/a Metro Caulking & Water Proofing; Power Design, Inc.; RC Aluminum Industries, Inc.; Southland Forming, Inc.; West Coast Florida Enterprises, Inc. f/k/a West Coast Roofing & Water Proofing, Inc. Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-16

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1605
WAYNE CURTIS SIRON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (11208-04) Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 19, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Curtis Siron, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Randolph L. Hutter, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WASHINGTON, D.C.; Donald L. Korb, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wayne Curtis Siron appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in Siron’s 1998 income taxes and assessing penalties. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Siron v. Comm’r. , Tax Ct. No. 11208-04 (U.S. Tax Ct. Apr. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Preliminary-assessment and upgrade of a groundwater flow model of the Seacoast Bedrock Aquifer, New Hampshire      

      December 31, 2017    

In 2003 and 2004, the U.S. Geological Survey investigated the availability of groundwater resources in a 160-square mile area of coastal New Hampshire (Figure 1) using a regional groundwater flow model (Mack, 2009). At that time, population growth and increasing water demand prompted concern for the sustainability of the region’s groundwater resources in a fractured-crystalline bedrock-aquifer with little storage. The groundwater  flow model developed for the previous study incorporated detailed water-use information for 2003-4 and simulated the effects of projected increases in water use. However, poor stream representation may reduce the effectiveness of the original model head simulations. Improvements to the model, made by incorporating the USGS’s MODLFOW-2005 Newton formulation (MODFLOW-NWT, Niswonger and others, 2011) and by more accurately representing stream characteristics, are presented in an example simulating approximate changes in water use. Groundwater heads in an area of relatively larger population change, near the center of the Seacoast’s fractured bedrock aquifer, were simulated with the upgraded model using published 2004, and approximated 2015, water use rates. This area is situated at a local topographic high point and near the junction of three towns, where drainages flow westward, toward Great Bay, and eastward, toward the Atlantic Ocean (Figure 1).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Thomas J Mack, PG

##### Hydrogeologist 

International Programs

tjmack@usgs.gov

603-226-7805

## Related Content

#### Thomas J Mack, PG

##### Hydrogeologist 

International Programs

tjmack@usgs.gov

603-226-7805

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - Aquifer
                  - Coastal Hydrology
                  - Groundwater
                  - Hydrologic Modeling
                  - Regional Flow Analysis
                  - Water
                  - Seacoast Bedrock Aquifer
                  -  New England
                  - United States
                  - New Hampshire

View All **
exv10w1





Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made between UNILIFE CORPORATION,
and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including UNILIFE MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. and UNILIFE MEDICAL
SOLUTIONS (PTY) LIMITED of 250 Cross Farm Lane, York, Pennsylvania, USA, 17406 (collectively,
“Unilife” or “Company”); and ALAN D. SHORTALL (“Executive”).



IT IS AGREED:





	1.	 	DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

	 
	1.1	 	Definitions

	 
	 	 	In this Amendment:

	 
	 	 	“Agreement” shall mean the Executive Employment Agreement entered into by the Company (as
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited) and the Executive on October 26, 2008, as amended or
substituted with the agreement of the relevant parties and in force at any relevant time;

	 
	 	 	“Parties” shall mean the Company and the Executive.

	 
	 	 	All other defined terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning
ascribed to them in the Agreement.

	 
	1.2	 	Interpretation

	 
	 	 	This Amendment shall be subject to the interpretation provisions set forth in Clause 24.2 of
the Agreement.

	 
	2.	 	PURPOSE

	 
	2.1	 	Background

	 
	 	 	The Company has employed the Executive as its Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the
Agreement, which will expire on June 30, 2011. The Parties wish to extend the expiration
date of the Agreement until December 31, 2011.




 


 









 





	2.2	 	Amendments

	 
	 	 	The Parties have agreed to amend clause 1.1 of the Agreement by deleting it in its entirety
and replacing it with the following:

	 
	 	 	“The Executive’s employment commences on the Commencement Date and will continue
until December 31, 2011 unless terminated earlier by either party pursuant to
clause 15 of this Agreement.”

	 
	3.	 	EFFECT

	 
	 	 	This Amendment shall be effective as of June 30, 2011. All other provisions of the
Agreement not amended by this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect.






NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants set forth above, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the Parties sign as follows, on this 18th day of July 2011.



	 	 	 	 
	UNILIFE CORPORATION

 	 
	By:  	/s/ J. Christopher Naftzger
 	 
	 	J. Christopher Naftzger 	 
	 	Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate   Secretary & Chief
Compliance Officer 	 



	 	 	 	 
	ALAN D. SHORTALL

 	 
	    /s/ Alan D. Shortall
 	 
	Signature of Alan D. Shortall 	 



	 	 	 	 
	   /s/ Deborah Milbourne
 	 
	Witness 	 
	 	 




 


2
Assertion by Bank One, Indiana, National Association


As of and for the ten  months  ended  December  31,  1999;  Bank  One,  Indiana,
National  Association,  has complied in all material  respects  with the minimum
servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as it relates to
the Banc One Financial  Services  Home Equity Loan Trust  1999-1.  As of and for
this same  period,  BANK ONE  CORPORATION  had in effect a fidelity  bond in the
amount of  $250,000,000  and an errors  and  omissions  policy in the  amount of
$25,000,000.



Kim D. Greaves
Senior Vice President
Bank One, Indiana, National Association

Tracie H. Klein
Vice President
Bank One, Indiana, National Association
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                     
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson               
|                    |  | Rodger L. Johnson                   
|                    |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6891

STEPHEN MARK BISHOP,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES FRENCH, Warden of Central Prison;

FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of North Carolina

Department of Correction; NORTH CAROLINA

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-96-771-2)

Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Mark Bishop, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Bishop v. French, No. CA-96-771-2 (M.D.N.C. May 22, 1997).

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-7064 September Term, 2020

1:20-cv-01425-UNA

Filed On: December 2, 2020

Brud Rudolph Rossman,

Appellant

v.

Miriam Sewell, Rehabilitation Services

Administration, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Millett and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit 

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s June 8, 2020 order

dismissing appellant’s complaint be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that

appellant’s complaint was frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Hagans v. Lavine,

415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50307]



                                                    VOL. 60, NO. 44

                                             Tuesday, March 7, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 44/Tuesday, March 4, 1995/Corrections
[[Page 12592]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 5-95]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone--Olympia/South Puget Sound Area, WA 
(Port of Olympia Customs Port of Entry Area); Application and Public 
Hearing

Correction

    In notice document 95-4633 appearing on page 10352 in the issue of 
Friday, February 24, 1995, make the following corrections:
    On page 10352,in the second column, in the fourth full paragraph, 
beginning in the seventh line, ``[60 days from date of publication]'' 
should read ``April 25, 1995''; and in the last line, ``[75 days from 
date of publication]).'' should read ``[May 10, 1995]).''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Courtney Duran DICKERSON v. STATE

CR-15-1045

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors,


Linux Gold Corp.





We consent to the use incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Linux Gold Corp., of our report dated June 18, 2008, except as to Note 16 which is as of August 29, 2008, on the consolidated balance sheet of Linux Gold Corp as of February 29, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended February 28, 2009.











“Smythe Ratcliffe LLP” (Signed)











Chartered Accountants


Vancouver, Canada





September 11, 2009