### 42101 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Notices

will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of proceduresavailable under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. Once an authorized program has EPA’s approval to accept electronic documents under certain programs, CROMERR § 3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program keep EPA apprised of any changes to laws, policies, or the electronic document receiving systems that have the potential to affect the program’s compliance with CROMERR § 3.2000.

On February 22, 2011, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) submitted an amended application titled ‘‘Electronic Reporting System’’ for revisions/modifications of its EPA-authorized programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed FDEP’s request to revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revisions/ modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Florida’s request to revise/ modify its following EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR parts 71, and 122, is being published in the Federal Register :

Part 71—Federal Operating Permit Programs;

Part 123—EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; and

Part 239—Requirements for State Permit Program Determination of Adequacy.

FDEP was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized programs listed above.

Matthew Leopard, Director, Office of Information Collection.

[FR Doc. 2015–17449 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[FRL–9926–11–OEI]**

**Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision**  **Approval, State of Vermont**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces EPA’s approval of the State of Vermont’s request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic reporting.

**DATES :**  EPA’s approval is effective July
16, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of proceduresavailable under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements. Once an authorized program has EPA’s approval to accept electronic documents under certain programs, CROMERR § 3.1000(a)(4) requires that the program keep EPA apprised of any changes to laws, policies, or the electronic document receiving systems that have the potential to affect the program’s compliance with CROMERR § 3.2000.

On December 5, 2011, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) submitted an amended application titled ‘‘Online Report Submittal System’’ for revisions/ modifications of its EPA-authorized programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting. EPA reviewed VT DEC’s request to revise/modify its EPA-authorized programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revisions/modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Vermont’s request to revise/modify its following EPA-authorized programs to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR parts 122, 280, and 281, is being published in the Federal Register: Part 123—EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; and Part 282— Approved Underground Storage Tank Programs.

VT DEC was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized programs listed above.

Matthew Leopard, Director, Office of Information Collection.

[FR Doc. 2015–17451 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9926–59–OEI]**

**Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision**  **Approval, State of Mississippi**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces EPA’s approval of the State of Mississippi’s request to revise/modify its EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System EPA-authorized program to allow electronic reporting.

**DATES :**  EPA’s approval is effective July
16, 2015.


### 42102 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Notices

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of proceduresavailable under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.

On January 14, 2010, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) submitted an application titled ‘‘Hazardous Waste Biennial Reporting System’’ and ‘‘Regulatory Services Portal’’ for revision/modification of its EPA-authorized Part 123 program under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed MDEQ’srequest to revise/modify its EPAauthorized Part 123—EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revision/modification set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve Mississippi’s request to revise/modify its Part 123— EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR part 122 is being published in the Federal Register

.

MDEQ was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized program listed above.

Matthew Leopard, Director, Office of Information Collection.

[FR Doc. 2015–17450 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE**  **CORPORATION**

**Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal**  **Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver,**  **Liquidator, or Manager**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

**ACTION :**  Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ‘‘of record’’ notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at www.fdic.gov/bank/ individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service

center.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Dated: July 13, 2015. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.



### I NSTITUTIONS IN 

### L IQUIDATION
[In alphabetical order]

FDIC Ref. No. Bank name City State Date closed

10515 ..................................... Premier Bank ......................... Denver ................................... CO ..... .................................... 7/10/2015

[FR Doc. 2015–17434 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6714–01–P**

**FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM**

**Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or**  **Bank Holding Company**

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 31,

2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201–2272: 1. The Armstrong 2011 Family Trust, Nelba Armstrong, trustee, Emory; Texas; J. Russell Armstrong 2011 GST Trust, John Russell Armstrong, Jr., trustee, both of Commerce, Texas; J. Russell Armstong Trust, John Russell Armstrong, Jr., and Lannette Armstrong Beaver, co-trustees, all of Commerce, Texas; Lannette A. Beaver 2011 GST Trust, Nancy Lannette Armstrong Beaver, trustee, both of Emory, Texas; N. Lannette Armstrong Beaver Trust, John Russell Armstrong, Jr., and Lannette Armstrong Beaver, co-trustees, all of Emory, Texas; John Russell Armstrong, Jr. and Lee Armstrong, both of Commerce, Texas; Matthew Russell