alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Simultaneous observations of geoelectric and geomagnetic fields produced by magnetospheric ULF waves      

      September 23, 2020    

Geomagnetic perturbations (BGEO) related to magnetospheric ultralow frequency (ULF) waves induce electric fields within the conductive Earth—geoelectric fields (EGEO)—that in turn drive geomagnetically induced currents. Though numerous past studies have examined ULF wave BGEO from a space weather perspective, few studies have linked ULF waves with EGEO. Using recently available magnetotelluric impedance and EGEO measurements in the contiguous United States, we explore the relationship between ULF waves and EGEO. We use satellite, ground‐based radar, BGEO, and EGEO measurements in a case study of a plasmaspheric virtual resonance (PVR), demonstrating that the PVR EGEO has significant spatial variation in contrast to a relatively uniform BGEO, consistent with spatially varying Earth conductivity. We further show ULF wave EGEO measurements during two moderate storms of ∼1 V/km. We use both results to highlight the need for more research characterizing ULF wave EGEO.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Benjamin S Murphy, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Mendenhall Postdoctoral Fellow

Geomagnetism Program

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

## Related Content

####             Benjamin S Murphy, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Mendenhall Postdoctoral Fellow

Geomagnetism Program

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-11-1999
<CASH>                                       35858
<SECURITIES>                                  8406
<RECEIVABLES>                               490978
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 281313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            816555
<PP&E>                                     1708501
<DEPRECIATION>                              (80306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2444750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       957637
<BONDS>                                    1000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    150
<COMMON>                                      4521
<OTHER-SE>                                  482442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2444750
<SALES>                                     631388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            631388
<CGS>                                       396072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7816940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            293977
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          302408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (8180192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (8180192)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (172716)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (8352908)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (2.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.02)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50207

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ LEON GONZALEZ-LONGORIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CA-64

- - - - - - - - - -

January 16, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

José Leon Gonzalez-Longoria appeals from the district

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that

he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his

attorney failed to investigate and “suppress” the “true chain of

custody” of the wiretap tapes and transcripts, improperly induced

Gonzalez-Longoria to waive his right to a jury trial, failed to

object to the introduction of the wiretap tapes and transcripts

as evidence, and improperly waived Gonzalez-Longoria’s PSR; that
No. 97-50207

-2-

he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel because

his attorney failed to raise the tainted-evidence issue on direct

appeal; that his due process rights were violated by the

introduction of the allegedly altered wiretap tapes and

transcripts; that his due process rights were violated by the

civil forfeiture proceeding; and that the district court erred by

failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Although the Government

argues that Gonzalez-Longoria’s claims of ineffective assistance

of trial counsel are not properly before this court, we have

reviewed those claims as well because they were considered by the

district court in its denial of Gonzalez-Longoria’s postjudgment

motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, the judgment is

AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the magistrate

judge and adopted by the district court in its denial of

Gonzalez-Longoria’s § 2255 motion, and for the reasons stated by

the district court in its denial of Gonzalez-Longoria’s

postjudgment motion for reconsideration. See Gonzalez-Longoria

v. United States of America, No. SA-92-CR-65 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 13,

1996); Gonzalez-Longoria v. United States of America, No. SA-92-

CR-65 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 1997).

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Occurrence and significance of formaldehyde in the Allende carbonaceous chondrite      

      January 1, 1972    

Meteorites may disperse formaldehyde to planets where, in the proper conditions, the compound could then serve as a precursor for carbohydrates.

## Citation Information
Although this was also a plea bargain case, the trial court did not note that fact on its certification.

1

NO. 12-08-00392-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES LEON JONES, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to engaging in organized criminal activity. The trial court sentenced

Appellant to imprisonment for twenty years in accordance with a sentencing recommendation

pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. The plea papers include a written admonishment, signed by

Appellant, in which he was informed that

[i]f the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the Prosecutor and

agreed to by the Defendant and his attorney, the [t]rial court must give its permission to the Defendant

before he may prosecute an appeal or any matter in the case, except for those matters raised by written

motions filed prior to trial[.]

Appellant also signed a written waiver of his right to appeal. We have received the trial court’s

certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The 1

certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. The clerk’s record supports the trial court’s

certification. See Greenwell v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals, 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App.
2

2005); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered November 26, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 58134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21124]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-17-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Transition Cost 
Recovery Report

Correction

    In notice document 95-27179 appearing on page 55712 in the issue of 
Thursday, November 2, 1995, the Docket number should appear as set 
forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Clarence Sylvester COBARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-648

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 31225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20619]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 31225]]



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans; Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 96-14566 appearing on page 29362 in the issue of 
Monday, June 10, 1996, in the second column, TIME: should read ``8 a.m. 
- 5:30 p.m. (est) and 1:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. (est).''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 on Forms S-3 (SEC File
No. 333-139752), and the related prospectus, and the registration statement
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-155907, 333-147603 and 333-138297) of China Direct
Industries, Inc. of our report dated December 31, 2009 related to the
consolidated balance sheets of China Direct Industries, Inc. and its
Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for
the years ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 appearing in China
Direct Industries, Inc.’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2009.





SHERB
& CO., LLP





/s/ Sherb & Co.,
LLP





Boca
Raton, Florida


December
31, 2009
Ricky SPIVEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-1124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4885 

AN ACT 

To require that user fees collected by the Internal Revenue 

Service be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4885 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IRS Oversight While 

3 Eliminating Spending (OWES) Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEPOSIT OF IRS USER FEES INTO GENERAL FUND 

5 OF THE TREASURY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section 3 

7 of title I of Public Law 103–329 (26 U.S.C. 7801 note), 

8 under the heading ‘‘ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS-INTER9 NAL REVENUE SERVICE’’, is amended by striking ‘‘The 

10 Secretary of the Treasury may spend’’ and all that follows 

11 through ‘‘and thereafter:’’ and inserting the following: 

12 ‘‘Any fees collected pursuant to this section shall be depos13 ited in the general fund of the Treasury and shall not be 

14 expended by the Internal Revenue Service unless provided 

15 by an appropriations Act:’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The last proviso of 

17 such section is amended by striking ‘‘and how they are 

18 being expended by the Service’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to fees collected after the date of 

21 the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 20, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4885 

AN ACT 

To require that user fees collected by the Internal 

fund of the Treasury. Revenue Service be deposited into the general
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 1, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 11194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80301]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

4302

Vol. 61, No. 24

Monday, February 5, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP90-137-029]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline

Company; Notice of Refund Report

Correction

FR notice documents 96-1696 and 96-

1697 beginning on page 3022, in the

issue of Tuesday, January 30, 1996, were

published in error and should be

removed.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Parts 100, 106, 109 and 114

Express Advocacy; Independent

Expenditures; Corporate and Labor

Organization Expenditures

Correction

In rule document 95–16502 beginning

on page 35292 in the issue of Thursday,

July 6, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 35303, in the second column,

in the second paragraph, in the fourth

line, after ‘‘reporting’’ insert

‘‘requirements set out in 11 CFR 109.2.

Section 109.2 requires’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Parts 100, 102, 109, 110 and

114

[Notice 1995-23]

Corporate and Labor Organization

Activity; Express Advocacy and

Coordination With Candidates

Correction

In rule document 95–30381 beginning

on page 64260 in the issue of Thursday,

December 14, 1995, make the following

corrections:

1. On page 64261, in the 3rd column,

in the 1st full paragraph, in the 14th line

from the bottom, ‘‘favorably’’ should

read ‘‘unfavorably’’.

2. On page 64267, in the first column,

in the third full paragraph, in the

seventh line from the bottom, ‘‘driver’’

should read ‘‘drive’’.

3. On page 64268, in the second

column, in the second full paragraph, in

the fifth line from the bottom, ‘‘even’’

should read ‘‘event’’.

PART 110—[CORRECTED]

4. On page 64273, in the second

column, in the Authority citation to Part

110, in the second line, ‘‘438(a)(98)’’

should read ‘‘438(a)(8)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Form CGFCRD3Z (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−14696−LMI

Chapter: 11

In re:

Cinemex Holdings USA, Inc.

175 South West 7th St., Suite 1108

Miami, FL 33130

EIN: 38−3935502

Cinemex USA Real Estate Holdings, Inc.

75 South West 7th St., Suite 1108

Miami, FL 33130

EIN: 35−2512194

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Laurel M Isicoff to consider the

following:

Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Joe Calascibetta Filed by Debtor Cinemex Holdings

USA, Inc. (Tomasco, Patricia) (391)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: January 18, 2022

Time: 01:30 PM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although

conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom

must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct

themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day

before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItfuqurDsoEnWyiKeoSfMa3m888k3mfBM

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 1/16/22 CLERK OF COURT

By: Noemi Sanabria

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-14696-LMI Doc 392 Filed 01/16/22 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           MGS-TES thermal inertia study of the Arsia Mons Caldera      

      January 1, 2008    

Temperatures of the Arsia Mons caldera floor and two nearby control areas were obtained by the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES). These observations revealed that the Arsia Mons caldera floor exhibits thermal behavior different from the surrounding Tharsis region when compared with thermal models. Our technique compares modeled and observed data to determine best fit values of thermal inertia, layer depth, and albedo. Best fit modeled values are accurate in the two control regions, but those in the Arsia Mons' caldera are consistently either up to 15 K warmer than afternoon observations, or have albedo values that are more than two standard deviations higher than the observed mean. Models of both homogeneous and layered (such as dust over bedrock) cases were compared, with layered-cases indicating a surface layer at least thick enough to insulate itself from diurnal effects of an underlying substrate material. Because best fit models of the caldera floor poorly match observations, it is likely that the caldera floor experiences some physical process not incorporated into our thermal model. Even on Mars, Arsia Mons is an extreme environment where CO2 condenses upon the caldera floor every night, diurnal temperatures range each day by a factor of nearly 2, and annual average atmospheric pressure is only around one millibar. Here, we explore several possibilities that may explain the poor modeled fits to caldera floor and conclude that temperature dependent thermal conductivity may cause thermal inertia to vary diurnally, and this effect may be exaggerated by presence of water-ice clouds, which occur frequently above Arsia Mons.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Arsia Mons Caldera; Mars
                  - Arsia Mons Caldera
                  -  Mars

View All **
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-179-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 28, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40628]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Revised Dst and the epicycles of magnetic disturbance: 1958-2007      

      January 1, 2009    

A revised version of the storm-time disturbance index Dst is calculated using hourly-mean magnetic-observatory data from four standard observatories and collected over the years 1958-2007. The calculation algorithm is a revision of that established by Sugiura et al., and which is now used by the Kyoto World Data Center for routine production of Dst. The most important new development is for the removal of solar-quiet variation. This is done through time and frequency-domain band-stop filtering - selectively removing specific Fourier terms approximating stationary periodic variation driven by the Earth's rotation, the Moon's orbit, the Earth's orbit around the Sun, and their mutual coupling. The resulting non-stationary disturbance time series are weighted by observatory-site geomagnetic latitude and then averaged together across longitudes to give what we call Dst5807-4SH. Comparisons are made with the standard Kyoto D st. Various biases, especially for residual solar-quiet variation, are identified in the Kyoto Dst, and occasional storm-time errors in the Kyoto Dst are noted. Using Dst5807-4SH, storms are ranked for maximum storm-time intensity, and we show that storm-occurrence frequency follows a power-law distribution with an exponential cutoff. The epicycles of magnetic disturbance are explored: we (1) map low-latitude local-time disturbance asymmetry, (2) confirm the 27-day storm-recurrence phenomenon using autocorrelation, (3) investigate the coupled semi-annual-diurnal variation of magnetic activity and the proposed explanatory equinoctial and Russell-McPherron hypotheses, and (4) illustrate the well-known solar-cycle modulation of storm-occurrence likelihood. Since Dst5807-4SH is useful for a variety of space physics and solid-Earth applications, it is made freely available to the scientific community.

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **