alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CGFD65 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 3, 2020

Paul G. Hyman, Jr.

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−13104−PGH

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Marc−Aurel Genece

5170 SW 19 St

Plantation, FL 33317

SSN: xxx−xx−2300

ORDER DETERMINING DEBTOR'S

COMPLIANCE WITH FILING REQUIREMENTS OF §521(a)(1)

 Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i), if an individual debtor in a voluntary case under chapter 7 or 13 fails to

file all of the information required under 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) within 45 days after the date of the filing of

the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day after the date of the filing

of the petition.

Page 1 of 2

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 30 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 2
 The information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1) as provided by the debtor* in this case is complete

to the satisfaction of the trustee and no creditor or other party in interest has filed a request for an order of

dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(2) as provided under Local Rule 1017−2(A)(2). Based upon the

trustee's review, the court has determined that the debtor has complied with the information requirements

of 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. This case is not subject to automatic dismissal under 11 U.S.C. §521(i)(1) or (2).

2. If any creditor or other party in interest has any reason to contest the court's finding that the

debtor has filed all information required by 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1), that party shall file an

objection not later than 21 days from the date of the entry of this Order, and serve such

objection on the trustee, the United States Trustee, debtor, and debtor's counsel, if any. The

objection should specifically identify the information and document(s) required by 11 U.S.C.

§521(a)(1) that the debtor has failed to file.

3. Each creditor or other party in interest served with this Order who does not file an objection

within the 21 day deadline set forth above has waived the right to file a motion to dismiss this

bankruptcy case for the debtor's failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. §521(a)(1).

4. Nothing in this Order shall excuse the debtor's duty to cooperate with the United States

Trustee and the trustee assigned to this case, and shall not prevent the United States Trustee

or case trustee from requesting by any authorized means, including, but not limited to motion,

that the debtor supply further information.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

* All references to "debtor" shall include and refer to both of the debtors in a case filed jointly by two

individuals.

Page 2 of 2

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 30 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 2
Tajhon WILSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Anita M. MCFARLAND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Christina PAYLAN, M. D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Brian BISHOP & Mark Detrio, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.
Justin Wallace BRYANT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1630

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3391 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 520
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3391

 To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act with respect to 
  suspension, revocation, and limitation of laboratory certification.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2012

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
  Franken, Mr. Burr, and Mr. Brown of Ohio) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

                           September 19, 2012

               Reported by Mr. Harkin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act with respect to 
  suspension, revocation, and limitation of laboratory certification.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taking Essential Steps for Testing 
Act'' or the ``TEST Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION, REVOCATION, AND LIMITATION OF LABORATORY 
              CERTIFICATION.

    Section 353 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 263a) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(1)(E), by inserting ``, except that 
        no proficiency testing sample shall be referred to another 
        laboratory for analysis as prohibited under subsection (i)(4)'' 
        before the period at the end; and
            (2) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by inserting before the 
                period at the end of the first sentence the following: 
                ``, except that if the revocation occurs pursuant to 
                paragraph (4) the Secretary may substitute intermediate 
                sanctions under subsection (h) instead of the 2-year 
                prohibition against ownership or operation which would 
                otherwise apply under this paragraph''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ``shall'' the 
                first place it appears and inserting ``may''.
                                                       Calendar No. 520

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3391

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act with respect to 
  suspension, revocation, and limitation of laboratory certification.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 19, 2012

                       Reported without amendment
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Numerical modeling of debris flows: A conceptual assessment      

      March 29, 2024    

Real-world hazard evaluation poses many challenges for the development and application of numerical models of debris flows. In this chapter we provide a conceptual overview of physically based, depth-averaged models designed to simulate debris-flow motion across three-dimensional terrain. When judiciously formulated and applied, these models can provide useful information about anticipated depths, speeds, and extents of debris-flow inundation as well as debris interactions with structures such as levees and dams. Depth-averaged debris-flow models can differ significantly from one another, however. Some of the greatest differences result from simulation of one-phase versus two-phase flow, use of parsimonious versus information-intensive initial and boundary conditions, use of tuning coefficients versus physically measureable parameters, application of dissimilar numerical solution techniques, and variations in computational speed and model accessibility. This overview first addresses these and related attributes of depth-averaged debris-flow models. It then describes model testing and application to hazard evaluation, with a focus on our own model, D-Claw. The overview concludes with a discussion of outstanding challenges for development of improved debris-flow models and suggestions for prospective model users.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Richard M. Iverson

##### Research Hydrologist Emeritus 

Cascades Volcano Observatory

riverson@usgs.gov

360-993-8920

#### David L George, Ph.D.

##### Research Mathematician

Cascades Volcano Observatory

dgeorge@usgs.gov

360-993-8932

## Related Content

#### Richard M. Iverson

##### Research Hydrologist Emeritus 

Cascades Volcano Observatory

riverson@usgs.gov

360-993-8920

#### David L George, Ph.D.

##### Research Mathematician

Cascades Volcano Observatory

dgeorge@usgs.gov

360-993-8932

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 27598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70524]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Part 212

[INS No. 1688-95]
RIN 1115-AD89


Waiver of the Two-Year Home Country Physical Presence 
Requirements for Certain Foreign Medical Graduates

Correction

    In rule document 95-12272 beginning on page 26676 in the issue of 
Thursday, May 18, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 212.7  [Corrected]

    On page 26681, in the second column, amendatory instruction 2. to 
Sec. 212.7 should read as set forth below.
    ``2. In Sec. 212.7, paragraphs (c)(9) and (c)(10) are redesignated 
as paragraphs (c)(10) and (c)(11), respectively, and a new paragraph 
(c)(9) is added to read as follows:''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
FILED

June 2, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

JUNE 1998 SESSION

VICTOR THOMPSON, )

)

Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9802-CR-00056

)

 vs. ) SHELBY COUNTY

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. P-12933

)

Respondent. )

O R D E R

This case represents an appeal from the dismissal of the petitioner’s

second petition for post-conviction relief. In 1992, the petitioner pled guilty to second

degree murder and aggravated assault and received a fifty year sentence. No appeal

apparently was taken. The petitioner, by and through counsel, subsequently filed a

petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the petition after conducting an

evidentiary hearing. This Court affirmed the denial on appeal, Victor Thompson v.

State, No. 02C01-9509-CR-00256 (Tenn. Crim. App., July 25, 1997), and the Supreme

Court denied permission to appeal on October 27, 1997. 

On January 9, 1998, the petitioner filed his second petition for postconviction relief. Finding that the petitioner had previously filed a petition for postconviction which was heard and resolved on the merits by a court of competent

jurisdiction, the trial court dismissed the petition without appointment of counsel or an

evidentiary hearing.

T.C.A. § 40-30-202(c) provides that no more than one petition for postconviction relief may be filed attacking a single judgment, and mandates that the trial

court shall summarily dismiss any second or subsequent petition if a prior petition was

filed and resolved on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction. Since the

petitioner previously filed a petition that was resolved on the merits by the trial court and
2

by this Court on appeal, the petitioner's present petition was properly dismissed. 

Additionally, after reviewing the entire record on appeal, we find that the petitioner’s

claim does not fall within one of the limited circumstances under which a prior petition

may be re-opened. See T.C.A. § 40-30-217. 

Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not err in summarily

dismissing the petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20,

Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. It appearing the petitioner is indigent, costs of

this appeal shall be taxed to the state.

Enter, this the ___ day of June, 1998.

__________________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

__________________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

__________________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Pecoraite, Ni6Si4O10(OH)8, nickel analog of clinochrysotile, formed in the wolf creek meteorite      

      January 1, 1969    

Pecoraite is a new phase in the natural system H2O-NiO-MgO- SiO2, the nickel analog of clinochrysotile. It occurs in cracks in the Wolf Creek meteorite in Australia where it was formed under hydrothermal conditions. Particles of pecoraite are very small curved plates which have begun to coil; some have achieved spiral form.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Australia

View All **
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
officer of Document Capture Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:




(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: August 14, 2009/s/David P.
      ClarkDavid P. Clark,Chief Executive
      Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-140113]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10841

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO AVILEZ-REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-89-1-Y

--------------------

December 16, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Avilez-Reyes appeals from his resentencing on remand

for his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to

distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the district court

erred by increasing his base offense level by two pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice and by refusing to

reduce his base offense level by three pursuant to § 3E1.1 for

his acceptance of responsibility. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Given the testimony and the 
No. 99-10841

-2-

information contained in the PSR, the district court did not

clearly err by increasing Avilez-Reyes’s base offense level for

obstruction of justice and by refusing to reduce his base offense

level for his acceptance of responsibility. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of JAG Media Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
  By:

/s/   Stephen J. SchoepferName:
    Stephen J. SchoepferTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4824 

To prohibit restrictions on possession, storage, or use of firearms in Federal 

programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2016 

Mr. YOUNG of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit restrictions on possession, storage, or use of 

firearms in Federal programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayers Second 

5 Amendment Protection Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FIREARMS RESTRICTIONS. 

7 No Federal official or entity may establish any prohi8 bition or restriction, or impose any condition, on the other9 wise lawful possession, storage, or use of firearms for any 

10 person assisted under any program established, adminisVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:35 Mar 23, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4824.IH H4824

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4824 IH

1 tered, or funded by any Federal entity or with any Federal 

2 funds. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 12**

 

**LaBRANCHE& CO INC. and SUBSIDIARIES**

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIOS OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES**

**(UNAUDITED)**

**(000’somitted)**

 
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **For the Years Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                     | ** ** | **2004**                                  | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** |
| Earnings (Loss):                               | ** ** | ** **                                | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** |
| Pre-tax  income (loss) (1)                     |       | $                                         | (58,703    | ) | $ | (191,502 | ) | $ | 158,315 |   | $ |  145,848 |   | $ | 166,577 |   |
| Add: fixed  charges                            |       | 67,323                                    |       | 54,430 |   | 59,485 |   | 64,067 |   | 42,099 |   |
| Pre-tax earnings (loss) before fixed  charges  |       | $                                         | 8,620      |   | $ | (137,072 | ) | $ | 217,800 |   | $ |  209,915 |   | $ | 208,676 |   |
| Fixed  charges:                                |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest  expense on all indebtedness          |       | 56,454                                    |       | 46,103 |   | 46,663 |   | 50,286 |   | 40,433 |   |
| Other                                          |       | 7,379                                     |       | 2,155 |   | 2,078 |   | 1,968 |   | 1,666 |   |
| Preferred  stock dividend requirements         |       | 3,490                                     |       | 6,172 |   | 10,744 |   | 11,813 |   | — |   |
| Total fixed  charges                           |       | $                                         | 67,323     |   | $ | 54,430 |   | $ | 59,485 |   | $ |  64,067 |   | $ | 42,099 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings (loss) to fixed charges (2) |       | 0.13                                      |       | (2.52 | ) | 3.66 |   | 3.28 |   | 4.96 |   |

 

----

(1)             Pre-taxincome (loss) does not include minority interest and income or loss from equityinvestees, but does include preferred stock dividend requirements.

 

(2)             Theratio of earnings to fixed charges for 2004 represents a $58.7 milliondeficiency, which was the result of a goodwill impairment charge of $37.6million, an exchange membership impairment charge of $18.3 million and $55.9 millionof charges related to the Company's debt refinancing. The ratio of loss tofixed charges for 2003 represents a $191.5 million deficiency, which was theresult of a goodwill impairment charge of $170.3 million and the $63.5 millionaccrual for the tentative settlement with the NYSE and SEC of theinvestigations of specialist trading activities.

 

----