alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2915 Non-Argument Calendar

D. C. Docket No. 94-1548-Civ-T-25B
SAMUEL WEISS, a child, by and through his parents and next friends, Debra S. Weiss and Major M. Benjamin Weiss, DEBRA S. WEISS, M. BENJAMIN WEISS, Major, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
(May 13, 1998)
Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Weiss is an autistic child; he is thirteen years old. In September 1994, his parents brought this suit for money damages as an appeal of a final order of the State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings rendered at the c onclusion of an administrative hearing conducted pursuant to Section 1415 (c) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1415. In their amended complaint, Samuel’s parents contend that the School Board of Hillsborough County, Florida, failed to provide Samuel with a “free appropriate public education,” as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and, in failing to provide such education, denied him rights established by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794. Samuel’s parents also conte nd that the School Board infringed two rights guaranteed Samuel by the Fourteenth Amendment: the right to the equal protection of the laws and the right of travel. On cross motions for summary judgement, the district court, in the order appearing in the Appendix, entered summary judgment for the School Board. Samuel’s parents appeal, contending the district court should have granted their motion for summary judgment and denied the Board’s motion. After considering their arguments for reversal, we conclude that, in all respects, the district court properly applied the law to the material facts (which the parties agree are not in dispute).
AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Shifts in lake N: P stoichiometry and nutrient limitation driven by atmospheric nitrogen deposition      

      January 1, 2009    

Human activities have more than doubled the amount of nitrogen (N) circulating in the biosphere. One major pathway of this anthropogenic N input into ecosystems has been increased regional deposition from the atmosphere. Here we show that atmospheric N deposition increased the stoichiometric ratio of N and phosphorus (P) in lakes in Norway, Sweden, and Colorado, United States, and, as a result, patterns of ecological nutrient limitation were shifted. Under low N deposition, phytoplankton growth is generally N-limited; however, in high-N deposition lakes, phytoplankton growth is consistently P-limited. Continued anthropogenic amplification of the global N cycle will further alter ecological processes, such as biogeochemical cycling, trophic dynamics, and biological diversity, in the world's lakes, even in lakes far from direct human disturbance.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jill S Baron, PhD

##### Research Ecologist, Senior Scientist (ST)

Fort Collins Science Center

jill_baron@usgs.gov

970-491-1968

## Related Content

#### Jill S Baron, PhD

##### Research Ecologist, Senior Scientist (ST)

Fort Collins Science Center

jill_baron@usgs.gov

970-491-1968

### Contacts

#### Jill S Baron, PhD

##### Research Ecologist, Senior Scientist (ST)

Fort Collins Science Center

jill_baron@usgs.gov

970-491-1968
Angela SCOTT v. Patrick HAND

2150999

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,854,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  440,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                    54,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,008,868
<PP&E>                                         951,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,387,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          458,387
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,000,000
<COMMON>                                         1,491
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,420,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,387,487
<SALES>                                        623,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               623,770
<CGS>                                          584,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,995,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,951,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,953,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,953,299)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 242 (Monday, December 16, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 66077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-31216]


      

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 242 / Monday, December 16, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 66077]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Docket No. 960828234-6331-03]
RIN 0690-AA25


Guidelines for Empowerment Contracting

Correction

    In notice document 96-30839 beginning on page 64321 in the issue of 
Wednesday, December 4, 1996, the document heading should read as set 
forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 10.36

 

INTERCOMPANY SERVICES EXTENSION AGREEMENT

 

This Extension Agreement dated as of January 1, 2012 is by and between Hallmark Cards, Incorporated (“Hallmark”) and Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (Crown Holdings”).

 

WHEREAS, Crown Holdings and Hallmark have previously entered into that certain Intercompany Services Agreement between the parties dated as of December 23, 2002, as subsequently extended and amended (the “Services Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to further extend the term of the Services Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, Crown Holdings and Hallmark hereby agree as follows:

 

The term of the Services Agreement shall be extended for an additional one (1) year period from the date hereof and shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year periods unless either party notifies the other party of its intent to terminate thirty (30) days prior to the start of any renewal term and subject to any earlier termination pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Services Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension Agreement as of the date set forth above.

 

 


	
HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATED
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ B. Gardner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Executive Vice President
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ C. Stanford
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Exec. VP
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: May 1980      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors
Digimarc Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-31114, 333-42042, 333-65256, and 333-82660) on
Form S-8 of Digimarc Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated February 5, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Digimarc Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Digimarc Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Portland,
Oregon
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Surface water-quality activities of the U.S. Geological Survey in New England      

      March 23, 2016    

View Document

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collaborates with a variety of Federal, State, local, and tribal partners on scientific projects to provide reliable and impartial water-quality data and interpretation to resource managers, planners, stakeholders, and the general public. The themes related to surface water quality include the following:

• Water quality monitoring networks • Effects of best management practices and low impact development on water quality • Load estimation techniques and total maximum daily load assistance • Mercury studies • Toxics and emerging contaminants • Eutrophication and nuisance algal blooms

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Thomas G Huntington, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

New England Water Science Center

thunting@usgs.gov

207-626-6610

## Related Content

#### Thomas G Huntington, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

New England Water Science Center

thunting@usgs.gov

207-626-6610

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - Surface Water Quality
                  - Surface Water
                  - Water Quality
                  - Water
                  - New England
                  - United States

View All **
Eric Deon MADISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2998

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40517 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Rosalino Pimentel**

**- Soto,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:20

- CR

- 46

- 1

Before **Barksdale, Costa,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Rosalino Pimentel

- Soto pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). His plea agreement included an appeal waiver, which reserved the right to challenge a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum and to assert a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 12, 2022 Lyle W. Cay ce Clerk Case: 21-40517 Document: 00516317132 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2022No. 21

- 40517

2 (IAC)

. At sentencing, Pimentel was , inter alia , offered an opportunity to comment on the presentence investigation report ; he stated he was satisfied with its accuracy. He was sentenced to, inter alia , 105 months’ imprisonment, at the top of the Sentencing Guidelines range. Pimentel , initially proceeding pro se , appealed and was appointed counsel. He claims his guilty plea and appeal waiver were not knowing and voluntary because of
IAC

. (The appeal waiver is not at issue because the Government does not seek to enforce it.) Generally, an IAC claim “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the dis trict court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations”

. United States
v. Montes , 602 F.3d 381, 387 (5th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). Instead, IAC claims ordinarily should be pursued on collateral review through a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. E.g. , Massaro v. United States , 538 U.S. 500, 504

– 05 (2003) (explaining “ a § 2255 motion is preferable to direct appeal” for IAC challenges) ; United States v. Villegas

- Rodriguez , 171 F.3d 224, 230 (5th Cir. 1999) (explaining ou r court “do[es] not review [ a n IAC] claim

. . . on direct appeal unless the district court has first addressed it”)

. Pimentel’s IAC claim was not presented in district court . Because the record is not sufficiently developed to make a fair evaluation of Pimentel ’s IAC claim, and because his challenges to the knowing and voluntary nature of his guilty plea are based on that claim, we decline to consider his claims without prej udice to collateral review. E.g. , United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014) (denying consideration of ineffective

- assistance challenge where record “undeveloped”)

. **AFFIRMED.** Case: 21-40517 Document: 00516317132 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2022
Johnny W. MILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Robert A. NORGARD, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Studies of geology and hydrology in the Basin and Range Province, Southwestern United States, for isolation of high-level radioactive waste - Evaluation of the regions      

      January 1, 1990    

View Document

View Plate 1

View Plate 2

View Plate 3

View Plate 4

View Plate 5

View Plate 6

View Plate 7

Six regions in the Basin and Range province, ranging in size from 21,600 to 80,000 square kilometers, were evaluated to identify prospective hydrogeologic environments for isolation of high-level radioactive waste. Prospective hydrogeologic environments were evaluated on the basis of the surface distribution of potential host rocks, late Cenozoic tectonic activity, hydrogeologic characteristics, and mineral and energy resources. These regions were selected as prospective for this study from a screening of the Basin and Range province. 

The six regions have certain characteristics that appear favorable for isolation of radioactive waste. The scant precipitation and great potential for water loss by evaporation and transpiration results in little surface runoff and ground-water recharge. This, combined with other hydrogeologic factors, results in areas within the regions that have thick unsaturated zones and long ground-water flow paths and traveltimes. 

Potential host media in the unsaturated zone include crystalline rocks, volcanic rocks, and basin fill. Potential host media in the saturated zone are predominantly crystalline igneous rocks but also include argillaceous rocks, evaporitic rocks, intracaldera tuffs, and laharic breccias. 

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher CARBIN v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01646-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 23, 2018 Closed: July 19, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Charles Demetries BOUTWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.

Chapter

/ 

DECLARATION REGARDING PAYMENT ADVICES

Debtor: 

 Copies of all payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the 

debtor from any employer within 60 days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are 

attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior, attach copies of any 

and all received and provide explanation that you didn’t work the full 60 days. 

)

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor had no income from 

any employer during the 60 days prior to filing the bankruptcy petition. 

 Copies of all payment advices are not attached because the debtor: 

receives disability payments 

is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation 

receives Social Security payments 

receives a pension 

does not work outside the home 

is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the debtor is unable to timely provide 

some or all copies of payment advices or other evidence of payment received 

Explain: 

Joint Debtor (if applicable):

 Copies of payment advices, pay stubs or other evidence of payment received by the joint 

debtor from any employer within 60 days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are 

attached. (Note: If you worked some, but not all of the 60 days prior, attach copies of any 

and all received and provide explanation that you didn’t work the full 60 days. 

)

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor had no income from 

any employer during the 60 days prior to filing the bankruptcy petition. 

Roger Castells 7

✔

Case 20-18810-SMG Doc 7 Filed 08/14/20 Page 1 of 2
LF-10 (rev. 12/01/09) Page 2 of 2 

 Copies of payment advices are not attached because the joint debtor: 

 receives disability payments 

 is unemployed and does not receive unemployment compensation 

 receives Social Security payments 

 receives a pension 

 does not work outside the home 

 is self employed and does not receive payment advices

 None of the statements above apply, however, the joint debtor is unable to timely 

provide some or all copies of payment advices or other evidence of payment received 

Explain: 

NOTE: When submitting copies of evidence of payment such as pay stubs or payment advices, 

it is your responsibility to redact (blackout) any social security numbers, names of minor 

children, dates of birth or financial account numbers before attaching for filing with the

court. See Local Rule 5005-1(A)(2).

Signature of Attorney or Debtor

Date: 

Signature of Joint Debtor, if applicable

Date: 

/s/ Roger Castells 08/14/2020

08/14/2020

Case 20-18810-SMG Doc 7 Filed 08/14/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 7157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10226]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 7157]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-119-001]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Corrected Tariff Sheets Filing

Correction

    In notice document 96-3774 appearing on page 6638 in the issue of 
Wednesday, February 21, 1996, the docket number should read as set 
forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Recent changes in stream flashiness and flooding, and effects of flood management in North Carolina and Virginia      

      June 1, 2016    

The southeastern United States has undergone anthropogenic changes in landscape structure, with the potential to increase (e.g., urbanization) and decrease (e.g., reservoir construction) stream flashiness and flooding. Assessment of the outcome of such change can provide insight into the efficacy of current strategies and policies to manage water resources. We (1) examined trends in precipitation, floods, and stream flashiness and (2) assessed the relative influence of land cover and flow-regulating features (e.g., best management practices and artificial water bodies) on stream flashiness from 1991 to 2013. We found mean annual precipitation decreased, which coincided with decreasing trends in floods. In contrast, stream flashiness, overall, showed an increasing trend during the period of study. However, upon closer examination, 20 watersheds showed stable stream flashiness, whereas 5 increased and 6 decreased in flashiness. Urban watersheds were among those that increased or decreased in flashiness. Watersheds that increased in stream flashiness gained more urban cover, lost more forested cover and had fewer best management practices installed than urban watersheds that decreased in stream flashiness. We found best management practices are more effective than artificial water bodies in regulating flashy floods. Flashiness index is a valuable and straightforward metric to characterize changes in streamflow and help to assess the efficacy of management interventions.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Carolina
                  -  Virginia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Small mammal populations at hazardous waste disposal sites near Houston, Texas, USA      

      January 1, 1990    

View Document

Small mammals were trapped, tagged and recaptured in 0?45 ha plots at six hazardous industrial waste disposal sites to determine if populations, body mass and age structures were different from paired control site plots. Low numbers of six species of small mammals were captured on industrial waste sites or control sites. Only populations of hispid cotton rats at industrial waste sites and control sites were large enough for comparisons. Overall population numbers, age structure, and body mass of adult male and female cotton rats were similar at industrial waste sites and control sites.  Populations of small mammals (particularly hispid cotton rats) may not suffice as indicators of environments with hazardous industrial waste contamination.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
Phillip Lee BUTLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. IRA SERVICES, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.