alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
cum in WR-48,152-08 hlLtU IN COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 6/1/2016 12:21:15 PM

June 1, 2016 Accepted 6/1/2016 12:33:29 PM

No. WR-48,152-08 ABELACLERK

ABELACOSTA, CLERK ♦-

3htthe

Court of Criminal appeals

&t Austin

Ex Parte

GARCIA GLEN WHITE

Applicant

On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus

From the 180th District Court of Harris County, Texas

No. 723847

APPLICANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION IN TIME IN WHICH

TO CORRECT DEFICIENCIES IN MAY 24, 2016 RESPONSE

To the Honorable Justices of the

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas:

Comes now, the Applicant, Garcia Glen White, by and through his attorneys

of record, Patrick F. McCann and Mandy Miller, and respectfully moves this

Honorable Court to extend the time for filing his Response to this Court's Order of

March 23, 2016, up to and including June 1, 2016. In support of such motion, the

Applicant would show the Court the following:

(1) After receiving one extension in time up to and including May 24,

2016, in which to file a Response worthy of this Court's attention, the Applicant

timely filed his Response on May 24, 2016.

1 | P a g e
(2) The undersigned counsel were advised telephonically by the Clerk of

this Court on June 1, 2016, that the Applicant's Response was deficient and had

been rejected for filing because of the unintended omission of the Certificate of

Compliance with respect to the word count ofthe Response.

(3) The undersigned have corrected this deficiency and,

contemporaneously with the filing of this motion for extension in time, have re

submitted the corrected Response.

(4) The undersigned apologize to both the Court and its Clerk for any

inconvenience this omission may have caused, and make assurances that steps

have been taken to ensure that this does not happen again.

PRAYER

Wherefore, premises considered, the Applicant prays that this Honorable

Court will, in all things, GRANT this motion, and permit the filing of the

Applicant's corrected Response to this Court's March 23, 2016 Order, and that the

Court further GRANT any additional relief to which the Applicant may be legally

and justly entitled.

DATED this 1ST day ofJune, 2016.

2 | P a g e
Respectfully submitted,

^^^?0€^f4WS*

Patrick McCann

State Bar No: 00792680

writlawyer(g)justice.com

Mandy Miller

State Bar No: 24055561

mandy@mandymillerlegal.com

909 Texas Ave., Ste. 205

Houston, TX 77002

(713)223-3805

Fax (713) 226-8097

Attorneys for the Applicant

Garcia Glen White

3 | P a g e
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Applicant has sent a copy of the foregoing instrument to counsel for the

State of Texas at the following electronic mail addresses on this 1st day of June,

2016:

Lynn Hardaway

Harris County Assistant District Attorney

hardaway_lynn@dao.hctx.net

Lori DeAngelo

Harris County Assistant District Attorney

deangelo_lori@dao.hctx.net

I

Patrick McCann

IX n*J~uLi

Mandy Miller

Attorneys for the Applicant

Garcia Glen White

4 | P a g e
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4839 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4839

   To prohibit the Government from requiring any person to assist in 
    devising a method for breaking the encryption of a wire or oral 
                             communication.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2016

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and in addition to 
    the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Government from requiring any person to assist in 
    devising a method for breaking the encryption of a wire or oral 
                             communication.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Devices Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF REQUIRING THE BREAKING OF ENCRYPTION OF WIRE OR 
              ORAL COMMUNICATIONS.

    No officer or entity of the Federal Government shall have any 
authority to require any person to assist in devising a method for 
breaking the encryption of a wire or oral communication as such term 
are defined for the purposes of chapter 119 of title 18, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
John Thomas KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2826

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Unknown Tenant No. 2, Troy DESMARAIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Formerly Known as Bank of New York as Trustee, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1151

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jean IDROVO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3675 

To expand the HUBZone program for communities affected by base 

realignment and closure, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2012 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To expand the HUBZone program for communities affected 

by base realignment and closure, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HUBZone Expansion 

5 Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDING HUBZONE PROGRAM FOR COMMU7 NITIES AFFECTED BY BASE REALIGNMENT 

8 AND CLOSURE. 

9 Section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 

10 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3675 IS

1 (1) in clause (iv), by striking the period at the 

2 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

3 (2) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and 

4 (iv) as subclauses (I), (II), (III), and (IV), respec5 tively; 

6 (3) in the matter preceding subclause (I), as so 

7 redesignated, by striking ‘‘means lands within’’ and 

8 inserting the following: ‘‘means— 

9 ‘‘(i) lands within’’; and 

10 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(ii) a geographic area that— 

12 ‘‘(I) is— 

13 ‘‘(aa) the municipality in 

14 which the military installation is 

15 located; 

16 ‘‘(bb) the county in which 

17 the military installation is lo18 cated; or 

19 ‘‘(cc)(AA) the census tract 

20 in which the military installation 

21 is located; or 

22 ‘‘(BB) the census tract in 

23 which the military installation is 

24 located and a census tract contig25 uous to that census tract; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•S 3675 IS

1 ‘‘(II) has a total population of 

2 not more than 50,000, as determined 

3 with reference to the most recent de4 cennial census;’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
# MDE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.maryland.gov Larry Hogan Governor BoydRutherford Lieutenant Governor Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator

### ~c1 

## · a928

## 1!

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (3RAOO) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 DearMr. Garvin: 

## RECEIVED 

# ocr 1

## ~: 2015 Ben Grumbles Secretary



## NOV 1?

## 2015 Division Director (3AP\JU)
On July 22, 2013, Maryland submitted the Baltimore Serious Nonattainment Area 8-Hour 0.08 ppm Ozone State Implementation Plan: Demonstrating Rate ofProgress for 2008, 2011 and 2012; Revision to the 2002 Base Year Emissions; and Serious Area AttainmentDemonstration. MDE would like to provide clarification thatthe 2012 attainmentMobile Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) are the 2012 Reasonable Further ProgresS: (RFP) MVEBs. Below are the. tables and correspondingpage numbers that show the 2012 attainmentMVEBs are the 2012 RFP MVEBs. 1. Table 4.7, "2012 Projected Controlled VOC and NOx Emission (tons/day) Baltimore Nonattainment Area," on page 39 ofthe 2013 submittal gives the 2012 projected controlled emi ion for attainment, by sector. The RFP for 2012projected controlled emissions for attainment, by sector i also discussed in Section 7.0 ofthe 2013 submittal, starting onpage 51
. 2. Thetotal2012 controlled emissions (to meetRFP) are listed on page 53. The total2012 emissions on pages 39 and 53 are the same (i.e. RFP and attainment inventories are equal). 3. Transportation conformity is discussed in Section 10, staring on page 91. The mobile budgets for 2012 are listed onpage 93. The mobile budgets on page 91 are the same as the mobile source controlled emissions in table4.7 on page 39. Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at410-537-3255. Sincerely,

George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director Air and Radiation Management Administration

### ~ Recycled Paper www.mde.maryland.gov TIY Users l-800-735·2258 Via Maryland Relay Service
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4712 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for an option 

under the Secure Mail Initiative under which a person to whom a 

document is sent under that initiative may require that the United 

States Postal Service obtain a signature from that person in order 

to deliver the document, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2016 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. WOODALL, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 

for an option under the Secure Mail Initiative under 

which a person to whom a document is sent under that 

initiative may require that the United States Postal Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 

deliver the document, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4712 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the De3 partment of Homeland Security Secure Mail Initiative 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. OPTION FOR SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT UNDER 

6 THE SECURE MAIL INITIATIVE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning not later than one year 

8 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

9 of Homeland Security shall provide for an option under 

10 the Secure Mail Initiative (or any successor program) 

11 under which a person to whom a document is sent under 

12 that initiative may require that the United States Postal 

13 Service obtain a signature from that person in order to 

14 deliver the document. 

15 (b) FEE.—The Secretary shall require the payment 

16 of a fee from a person requiring a signature under the 

17 option required to be provided under subsection (a), which 

18 shall be in such an amount as is reasonable to recoup the 

19 costs of providing such option to such person. 

20 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

21 Beginning not later than one year after the date of 

22 the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the 

23 Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to Congress 

24 a report which includes— 

25 (1) for the first report, the implementation of 

26 the requirements under section 1; 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4712 IH

1 (2) the fee imposed under section 1(b); and 

2 (3) the number of times during the previous 

3 year that a person required a signature under the 

4 required to be provided under section 1(a). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Scented guide ropes as a method to enhance brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis) trap capture success on Guam      

      January 1, 2011    

Current methods for controlling the invasive Brown Treesnake (Boiga irregularis) on Guam include a modified minnow trap with a live mouse lure. We investigated the effects on capture success of augmenting these traps with scented guide ropes leading to trap entrances. Initial screening of scent preferences was based on time spent in scented and unscented arms of a Y-maze. Preferences of large and small snakes were scored for six different prey scents (live and carrion gecko, skink, and mouse). Large snakes spent more time in the maze arm scented with live gecko and carrion gecko, whereas small snakes spent more time in the arm scented with carrion mouse and carrion gecko. After the laboratory study, a pilot trapping session was conducted in the field using three treatments (live mouse-scented ropes, carrion gecko-scented ropes, and carrion mouse-scented ropes) and two controls (traps with unscented guide ropes and those with no ropes attached). Contrary to laboratory results, live mouse-scented ropes were most effective. We conducted a second trapping session using live mouse-scented ropes as well as the two controls used in the pilot study. For snakes of below-average to average condition, the number of captures for traps with live mouse-scented ropes was higher than for traps with no ropes. However, for snakes of above-average condition, there were no differences in capture rates between trap treatments. Overall, treatment effects were weaker than latent individual heterogeneity and the influence of snake body size, with large snakes trapped more readily.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Amy Yackel Adams, PhD

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

yackela@usgs.gov

970-226-9489

## Related Content

#### Amy Yackel Adams, PhD

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

yackela@usgs.gov

970-226-9489

### Contacts

#### Amy Yackel Adams, PhD

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

yackela@usgs.gov

970-226-9489

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Guam

View All **
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 113 Filed 07/08/22 Page 1 of 5
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 113 Filed 07/08/22 Page 2 of 5
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 113 Filed 07/08/22 Page 3 of 5
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 113 Filed 07/08/22 Page 4 of 5
Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 113 Filed 07/08/22 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 3, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-11003]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

7 CFR Part 810


Special Grade Designations

CFR Correction

    In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 700 to 899, 
revised as of January 1, 1995, on page 565, Sec. 810.108 was 
inadvertently removed. The correct text of the section as published in 
title 7 revised as of January 1, 1988, reads as follows:


Sec. 810.108  Special grade designations.

    Special grade designations are shown as prescribed in Sec. 810.106. 
Multiple special grade designations will be listed in alphabetical 
order. In the case of treated wheat, the official certificate shall 
show whether the wheat has been scoured, limed, washed, sulfured, or 
otherwise treated.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50807]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Avaition Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ASW-01]


Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Seymour, TX

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-15722 beginning on page 33162 in the 
issue of Tuesday, June 27, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 33163, in the first column, in the amendment to Sec. 71.1, 
before the last line of stars insert ``That airspace extending upward 
from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile radius of Seymour 
Municipal Airport.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Processed and interpreted U.S. Geological Survey seismic reflection profile and vertical seismic profile, Powder River and Carter Counties, Montana      

      January 1, 1981    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### John J Miller

##### Scientist Emeritus

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jmiller@usgs.gov

303-236-5752

## Related Content

#### John J Miller

##### Scientist Emeritus

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jmiller@usgs.gov

303-236-5752

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Central Energy Resources Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBldg. 25Denver, CO80225United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Montana

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re: Case No. 18-14162-EPK 

Chapter 7

FORTE INTERACTIVE, INC.,

Debtor.

______________________________________/

DEBORAH MENOTTE,

Plaintiff,

v. Adv. Proc. No. 20-01120-EPK

ALBERT CLAY WILLIAMS; MARIANNA

WILLIAMS; ROBERT ANDERSON; 313

DATURA, LLC; THE ACHIEVE AGENCY,

LLC; ACHIEVE OF FLORIDA, LLC; and

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND CERTAIN DEADLINES

Erik P. Kimball, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 9, 2020.

Case 20-01120-EPK Doc 23 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 3
2

THIS MATTER came before the Court on October 8, 2020 for Pretrial Conference. For the 

reasons stated on the record at the Pretrial Conference, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Pretrial Conference in this matter is hereby CONTINUED to December 10, 2020

at 9:30 a.m. (the “Continued Pretrial Conference Date”).

2. The Pretrial Conference will be conducted by telephone only. To appear by telephone, 

you must establish an account with CourtSolutions and follow its procedures. It is wise to establish 

an account well ahead of an initial telephone appearance. Reservations should be arranged online at 

https://www.court-solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be 

made by telephone at (917) 746-7476. Absent an emergency, telephone appearances must be arranged 

with the conference call service not later than 3:00 p.m. prevailing Eastern Time on the court day prior

to the hearing date. Each participant must dial into the call no later than 10 minutes prior to the 

scheduled hearing. The conference call service will not call participants. If requested not later than 

two court days prior to the hearing and approved by Judge Kimball, the conference call service fee 

may be waived for pro se parties who are unable to pay the fee, parties represented on a pro 

bono basis, and certain governmental entities.

3. Except for the deadlines set forth in Paragraphs 1(a) (right to jury trial; waiver) and 

1(b) (objection to entry of final orders and judgments by the bankruptcy court; consent) of this Court’s 

Order Setting Filing and Disclosure Requirements for Pretrial and Trial [ECF No. 15] (the “Deadline Order”), 

all deadlines shall be calculated based on the Continued Pretrial Conference Date.

4. All other provisions of the Deadline Order remain in full force and effect to the extent 

not inconsistent with this Order.

###

Copies furnished to:

Rilyn A. Carnahan, Esq.

Case 20-01120-EPK Doc 23 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 3
3

Rilyn A. Carnahan, Esq. is directed to serve a copy of this order on all appropriate parties and to file a certificate of 

service with the Court.

Case 20-01120-EPK Doc 23 Filed 10/13/20 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 28575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10601]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80125]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


[Release No. 35182; File No. SR-PTC-94-07]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Participants Trust Company; Notice 
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Establishing a Daily Penalty Fee 
Applicable to Late Funding of Shortfalls in Participants Mandatory 
Deposits to the Participants Fund

    December 30, 1994

Correction

    In notice document 95-380 appearing on page 2416 in the issue of 
Monday, January 9, 1995, in the second column, the date line after the 
subject line, was omitted and should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-155659, 333-150993, 333-150256 and 333-142403, and Forms S-8 Nos. 333-150257, 333-123184 and 333-115649) of National Coal Corp. of our report dated March 31,2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of National Coal Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Nashville, Tennessee 

March 31, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40807]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 30 and 150

[CGD 95-900]
RIN 2115-AF07


Bulk Hazardous Materials; Correction

Correction

    In rule document 95-18764 beginning on page 39267 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 2, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 39267, in the second column, in paragraph 6., in the 
correction to paragraph s., in the second line, ``Ethylene glycol'' 
should read ``Diethylene glycol''.
    2. On the same page, in the third column:
    a. In the seventh line from the top, ``GILT'' should read ``GLT''.
    b. In paragraph 11., in the third line, ``DAN'' should read 
``DAH''; and in the seventh line, ``LEO/'' should read ``VEO/''.
    c. In paragraph 14., in the fourth entry, the first line should 
read ``N-(2-Methoxy-1-methyl ethyl)-2-ethyl-6-''.
    d. In paragraph 14., in the sixth entry, in the first line, 
``aide'' should read ``fide''; and in the third line, ``polysulfide'' 
was misspelled.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D