alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

47550

Vol. 61, No. 175

Monday, September 9, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Parts 75, 76, 77, 270, 271, 272,

607, 642, 648, 662, 663, and 664

48 CFR Chapter 34

Regulatory Reinvention

Correction

In proposed rule document 96–21568

beginning on page 43640 in the issue of

Friday, August 23, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 43641, in the first column, in

the second paragraph, under Contact:,

in the sixth and seventh lines, ‘‘kathy—

thomas@ed.gov’’ should read

‘‘kathylthomas@ed.gov’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 801, 803, 804, 807, 820,

and 897

[Docket No. 95N–0253]

RIN 0910–AA48

Regulations Restricting the Sale and

Distribution of Cigarettes and

Smokeless Tobacco to Protect

Children and Adolescents

Correction

In rule document 96–21900 beginning

on page 44396 in the issue of

Wednesday, August 28, 1996, make the

following corrections:

1. On page 44396, in the second

column, under ‘‘DATES: Effective

date.’’, in the last line ‘‘February 28,

1998’’ should read ‘‘August 28, 1998’’.

2. On the same page, in the same

column, under ‘‘DATES: Compliance

dates., in the last line ‘‘February 28,

1998’’ should read ‘‘August 28, 1998’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Parts 3, 103, and 242

[EOIR No. 114I; A.G. Order No. 2051-96]

RIN 1125-AA15

Fees for Motions to Reopen or

Reconsider

Correction

In rule document 96–22335 beginning

on page 46373 in the issue of Tuesday,

September 3, 1996, make the following

corrections:

PART 3 [CORRECTED]

1. On page 46374, in the first column,

in the authority citation, in the third

line, after ‘‘509,’’ add ‘‘510,’’.

§103.7 [Corrected]

2. On the same page, in the second

column, in §103.7(b)(1), in the second

paragraph, in the 12th line, ‘‘on or’’

should read ‘‘or on’’.

PART 242 [CORRECTED]

3. On the same page, in the third

column, in the authority citation, in the

second line, ‘‘1524’’ should read

‘‘1254’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: March 1981      

      January 1, 1981    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-20606]




Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 110 / Thursday, June 6, 1996 / 
Corrections

[[Page 28930]]



DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 94-59]


Robert M. Golden, M.D.; Revocation of Registration

Correction

    In notice document 96-12231 beginning on page 24808 in the issue of 
Thursday, May 16, 1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 24811, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in 
the 13th line, ``1306.04(4)'' should read ``1306.04(a)''.
    2. On page 24812, in the third column, in the ninth line from the 
top ``Konstantin v. DEA, 1955'' should read ``Konstantin v DEA, 1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-24755-EPK

STEVEN J. HERZLICH Chapter 7 

MORGAN R. HERZLICH, 

Debtors. 

________________________________/ 

ORDER AWARDING FINAL TRUSTEE FEES AND EXPENSES [ECF#29]

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Final Application for Compensation and 

Expenses [ECF#41] filed by the Trustee, DEBORAH C. MENOTTE. The Court having

considered the fee application presented and having considered all relevant material thereto, 

finds that the following allowances are reasonable under the applicable provisions of the 

Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Trustee, DEBORAH C. MENOTTE, is allowed total final fees of $1,650.00

Erik P. Kimball, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on July 12, 2021.

Case 19-24755-EPK Doc 44 Filed 07/12/21 Page 1 of 2
and total final expenses of $258.92 which includes the fees and expenses sought in the pending 

application and all previously awarded interim fees and expenses, if any. 

2. The Trustee is authorized to make the balance of payments set forth in this order or 

to pay the awards pro rata if there are insufficient funds. 

In allowing the foregoing fees, the Court has considered the criteria specified in 11 U.S.C. 

§§326 and 330, and the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 2016. 

### 

Submitted by: 

Deborah C. Menotte, Chapter 7 Trustee 

P O Box 211087

W Palm Beach, FL 33421

dmenotte@gmail.com

Deborah Menotte, Trustee shall serve a copy of the signed order on all required parties and file with the 

Court a certificate of service conforming with Local Rule 2002-1(F).

Case 19-24755-EPK Doc 44 Filed 07/12/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In Re: PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 13

Alexander Cano CASE NO. 20-10517-AJC 

 Debtor(s) / 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true copy of the Objection to Claim 5-1 and Notice of Hearing were served as 

follows on March 31, 2020:

The following entities were served by electronic transmission:

Nancy K. Neidich e2c8f01@ch13miami.com, ecf2@ch13miami.com

Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

The following were served as follows:

Navient Solutions, LLC on behalf of

Department of Education Loan Services

Ascendium Education Solutions, Inc. 

P.O. Box 8961

Madison, WI 53708

Navient Solutions, LLC 

C/o Beth Dries 

Loan Servicing Specialist

220 Lasley Ave

Wilkes-Barre, PA 18706

William Pelham Barr

Attorney General of the United States 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

Washington, DC 20530

Certified Mail: 7010-1670-0000-0159-6133

Betsy Devos, Secretary of Education

U.S. Department of Education

400 Maryland Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20202

Certified Mail: 7010-1670-0000-0159-6140

Ariana Fajardo Orshan 

US Attoreny for Southern District of Florida

99 NE 4th ST 

Miami, FL 33132

Certified Mail: 7010-1670-0000-0159-6157

Case 20-10517-AJC Doc 34 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Patrick L Cordero, Esq. 

Attorney for Debtor 

7333 Coral Way 

Miami, Florida 33155

Tel: (305) 445-4855

 /s/ (FILED ECF) (The Debtor's Attorney)

Patrick L. Cordero, Esq., FL Bar No. 801992

Case 20-10517-AJC Doc 34 Filed 03/31/20 Page 2 of 2
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4428

_____________________________
D ARIEN B UFORD , Appellant,

v.

L OWELL C OLLINS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles A. Francis , Judge

. July 19, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Linda A. Bailey and Hunter J. Hendrix of the Law Office of Linda A. Bailey, P.A., Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Olivia Brooks and Joseph E. Brooks of Brooks Law, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 66 Filed 05/23/24 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 66 Filed 05/23/24 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 66 Filed 05/23/24 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 164 (Thursday, August 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 44120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40824]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-940-5700-00; CACA 35718]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; 
California

Correction

    In notice document 95-15296 beginning on page 32559 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 22, 1995, make the following correction:
    In the same page, in the third column, in the land description, T. 
2 S., R. 17 E., in Sec. 13, the first line should read ``SW\1/4\SW\1/
4\, S\1/2\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, E\1/2\SE\1/4\,''.
BILLING CODE 1506-01-D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

55087

Vol. 60, No. 208

Friday, October 27, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. RP95-426-001 and TM96-2-25-

001]

Mississippi River Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Compliance

Filing

Correction

In notice document 95–25909

appearing on page 54072 in the issue of

Thursday, October 19, 1995, in the third

column, the Docket number should read

as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Labor Surplus Area Classification

Under Executive Orders 12073 and

10582; Notice of the Annual List of

Labor Surplus Areas

Correction

In notice document 95–25267

beginning on page 53208 in the issue of

Thursday, October 12, 1995, make the

following corrections:

On pages 53208, 53210, 53211, 53213,

53214, 53216, and 53217, the table is

corrected as follows.

LABOR SURPLUS AREAS ELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL

PROCUREMENT PREFERENCE

[October 1, 1995 Through September 30, 1996]

Eligible labor surplus

areas

Civil jurisdictions included

ALABAMA

* * * ............................ * * *

Gadsden City ............ Gadsden City in

Etowah County.

* * * ............................ * * *

Marengo County ....... Marengo County.

* * * ............................ * * *.

CALIFORNIA

* * * ............................ * * *

Napa City .................. Napa City in Napa

County.

* * * ............................ * * *

Oceanside City .......... Oceanside City in

San Diego County.

Ontario City ............... Ontario City in San

Bernardino County.

LABOR SURPLUS AREAS ELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL

PROCUREMENT PREFERENCE—Continued

[October 1, 1995 Through September 30, 1996]

Eligible labor surplus

areas

Civil jurisdictions included

* * * ............................ * * *

Plumas County .......... Plumas County.

* * * ............................ * * *

San Bernardino City .. San Bernardino City

in San Bernardino

County.

* * * ............................ * * *

Trinity County ............ Trinity County.

* * * ............................ * * *

MASSACHUSETTS

* * * ............................ * * *

Barnstable Town ....... Barnstable Town in

Barnstable County.

* * * ............................ * * *.

MICHIGAN

* * * ............................ * * *

Benzie County ........... Benzie County.

* * * ............................ * * *

Pontiac City ............... Pontiac City.

* * * ............................ * * * .

PENNSYLVANIA

* * * ............................ * * *

Wilkes-Barre City ...... Wilkes-Barre City in

Luzerine County.

* * * ............................ * * *

York City ................... York City in York

County.

* * * ............................ * * *

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Post-landing major element quantification using SuperCam laser induced breakdown spectroscopy      

      January 21, 2022    

The SuperCam instrument on the Perseverance Mars 2020 rover uses a pulsed 1064 nm laser to ablate targets at a distance and conduct laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) by analyzing the light from the resulting plasma. SuperCam LIBS spectra are preprocessed to remove ambient light, noise, and the continuum signal present in LIBS observations. Prior to quantification, spectra are masked to remove noisier spectrometer regions and spectra are normalized to minimize signal fluctuations and effects of target distance. In some cases, the spectra are also standardized or binned prior to quantification. To determine quantitative elemental compositions of diverse geologic materials at Jezero crater, Mars, we use a suite of 1198 laboratory spectra of 334 well-characterized reference samples. The samples were selected to span a wide range of compositions and include typical silicate rocks, pure minerals (e.g., silicates, sulfates, carbonates, oxides), more unusual compositions (e.g., Mn ore and sodalite), and replicates of the sintered SuperCam calibration targets (SCCTs) onboard the rover. For each major element (SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, FeOT, MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O), the database was subdivided into five “folds” with similar distributions of the element of interest. One fold was held out as an independent test set, and the remaining four folds were used to optimize multivariate regression models relating the spectrum to the composition. We considered a variety of models, and selected several for further investigation for each element, based primarily on the root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) on the test set, when analyzed at 3 m. In cases with several models of comparable performance at 3 m, we incorporated the SCCT performance at different distances to choose the preferred model. Shortly after landing on Mars and collecting initial spectra of geologic targets, we selected one model per element. Subsequently, with additional data from geologic targets, some models were revised to ensure results that are more consistent with geochemical constraints. The calibration discussed here is a snapshot of an ongoing effort to deliver the most accurate chemical compositions with SuperCam LIBS.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

#### Travis S.J. Gabriel, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

tgabriel@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

#### Travis S.J. Gabriel, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

tgabriel@usgs.gov

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

p0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

148028

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148028

COA: 317689

Muskegon CC: 02

- 047915

- FC

SANDY SEAN HOLT, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24 , 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           The role of salt in the structural development of central Utah      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

Multiple episodes of diapirism, probably salt generated, have determined the structural pattern of central Utah. The causative salt and other evaporites are integral components of the Arapien Shale of Middle Jurassic age, one of the most unusual stratigraphic units in central Utah.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 This is notice that on March 10, 2009, Penick Corporation, 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II. Drug
ScheduleCoca Leaves (9040)
IIRaw Opium (9600)
IIPoppy Straw (9650)
IIConcentrate of Poppy Straw (9670)
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances to manufacture bulk controlled substance intermediates for sale to its customers. As noted in a previous notice published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on September 23, 1975 (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substances in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied. Dated: April 17, 2009. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-9778 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 9, 2022

No. 04-22-00735-CR

IN RE Adrian James HILLARD Jr.

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

Relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he asks this court to release him 

from custody. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid 

representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a 

right to hybrid representation means Relator’s pro se habeas corpus petition will be treated as 

presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas 

corpus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on November 9, 2022.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of November, 2022.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022-CR-2190, styled State of Texas vs. Adrian James Hillard, Jr., pending 

in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Quantity and quality of streamflow in the White River basin, Colorado and Utah      

      January 1, 1984    

View Document

The water quality and flow of existing streams in the White River basin, located in northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah, are adequate for present uses, but future development (such as energy) may affect stream quality and quantity. Present conditions are described as a baseline to enable planners to allocate available water and to measure changes in quantity and quality of water in the future. The White River basin contains extensive energy resources consisting of oil, natural gas, coal, and oil shale. Large quantities of water will be required for energy-resource development and associated municipal and industrial uses. An average of 70% of the annual flow in the White River occurs during May, June, and July as a result of snowmelt runoff. The 7-day, 10-year low-flow discharges/sq mi and the 1-day, 25-year high-flow discharges/sq mi are larger in the eastern part of the basin than in the western part. Flow-duration curves indicate that high flows in the White River and the North and South Fork White Rivers result mainly from snowmelt runoff and that base flow is sustained throughout the year by groundwater discharge from the alluvial and bedrock aquifers. Water type varies in the basin; however, calcium and sodium are the dominantly occurring cations and sulfate and bicarbonate are the dominantly occurring anions. Computed total annual dissolved-solids loads in the White River range from 31 ,800 tons/yr in the North Fork White River to 284,000 tons/yr at the mouth. A 10% increase to a 14% decrease of the dissolved-solids load could result at the mouth of the White River near Ouray, Utah. This corresponds to a 5% increase to a 10% decrease in dissolved-solids concentration. The seasonal pattern of stream temperatures was found to fit a harmonic curve. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - White River Basin
                  - Colorado
                  -  Utah

View All **
Johnny HAUGABOOK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

DIGIMARC CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, E.K. Ranjit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|Date: December 8, 2003 |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:                    |  | /s/E.K. RANJITE.K. Ranjit Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks