alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES
             13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Richard Astrom, the Chief Executive Officer of National Residential
         Properties, Inc., certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
                  National Residential Properties, Inc.;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
                  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
                  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
                  circumstances under which such statements were made, not
                  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
                  financial information included in this report, fairly present
                  in all material respects the financial condition, results of
                  operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of,
                  and for, the periods presented in this report.

         Dated: January 8, 2004                    By:  /s/  RICHARD ASTROM
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Richard Astrom
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: May 1981      

      January 1, 1981    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
### NUMBER S 13

- 10

- 00 607

- CR AND 13

- 10

- 00 608

- CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

SHIROD MILLER III , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 28 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza , Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Shirod Miller III , attempts to appeal a conviction for theft and a
conviction for theft of service. The trial court has certified in both case s that this A is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. @ See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2).2

On October 28, 2010 , this Court notified appellant = s counsel of the trial court = s
certification s and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel = s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification s

. On May 12, 2011 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel = s response
does not establish that the certification s currently on file with this Court are incorrect or that appellant otherwi se has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court = s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44. 3, 44.4. Accordingly, th ese appeal s are DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 19th day of May , 20 1 1

.
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Benoit Laliberte, certify that;
 
 (1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Studio Bromont, Inc.;
 
 (2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
 make t he statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
 covered by this report;
 
 (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
 the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
 procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
 supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
 known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
 conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
 based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
 business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
 materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5)  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over
 financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons
 performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
 reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
 and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
 issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 19, 2003
 
 
 /s/  Benoit Laliberte
 By: Benoit Laliberte
 Title: Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
  1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seismic and geodetic signatures of fault slip at the Slumgullion Landslide Natural Laboratory      

      January 1, 2011    

We tested the hypothesis that the Slumgullion landslide is a useful natural laboratory for observing fault slip, specifically that slip along its basal surface and side-bounding strike-slip faults occurs with comparable richness of aseismic and seismic modes as along crustal- and plate-scale boundaries. Our study provides new constraints on models governing landslide motion. We monitored landslide deformation with temporary deployments of a 29-element prism array surveyed by a robotic theodolite and an 88-station seismic network that complemented permanent extensometers and environmental instrumentation. Aseismic deformation observations show that large blocks of the landslide move steadily at approximately centimeters per day, possibly punctuated by variations of a few millimeters, while localized transient slip episodes of blocks less than a few tens of meters across occur frequently. We recorded a rich variety of seismic signals, nearly all of which originated outside the monitoring network boundaries or from the side-bounding strike-slip faults. The landslide basal surface beneath our seismic network likely slipped almost completely aseismically. Our results provide independent corroboration of previous inferences that dilatant strengthening along sections of the side-bounding strike-slip faults controls the overall landslide motion, acting as seismically radiating brakes that limit acceleration of the aseismically slipping basal surface. Dilatant strengthening has also been invoked in recent models of transient slip and tremor sources along crustal- and plate-scale faults suggesting that the landslide may indeed be a useful natural laboratory for testing predictions of specific mechanisms that control fault slip at all scales.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Hazards Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

twoods@usgs.gov

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Slumgullion landslide
                  - Colorado

View All **
EX-10.1.G




 Exhibit 10.1(g) 

AMENDMENT NO. 6 
 TO THE 
 CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC. 

SENIOR EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

WHEREAS, Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Senior
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, effective November 9, 2011,
the Company formally changed its name to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan
permits the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the
Company now desires to amend the Plan to reflect the change in the name of the Company; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the
Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	 The Plan is hereby renamed the “Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. Senior Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.” 



 

	2.	 Section 2.6 of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 



“2.6 Company. ‘Company’ shall mean (i) for periods prior to November 9, 2011, Cedar
Shopping Centers, Inc. and (ii) for periods on and after November 9, 2011, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. and any successor thereto which adopts this Plan.” 
  

	3.	 This Amendment shall be effective as of November 9, 2011. 



 

	4.	 Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 










 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this
Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the 14th day of December, 2011. 
  

			
	 CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.
 (formerly known as CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS, INC.)

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brenda J. Walker

		 	 Name: Brenda J. Walker

Title: Vice President




  
 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70518]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determination

Correction

    In notice document 95-11914 appearing on page 25940 in the issue of 
Monday, May 15, 1995, in the first paragraph, in the next to last line, 
``December 56, 1995,'' should read ``December 5, 1995,''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50207]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Christopher H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oilsands Quest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.December 15, 2006   /s/ Christopher H. Hopkins Christopher H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 17611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90406]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UT-080-1430-01; UTU-71261]


Notice of Realty Action

Correction

    In notice document 95-6694 beginning on page 15152 in the issue of 
Wednesday, March 22, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 15153, in the table, in Parcel No. 14, in the land 
description, the first line should read ``T. 3 S., R. 20 E.,''.
    2. On page 15154, in the table, in Parcel No. 39, in the land 
description, the second line should read ``Sec. 15: NW\1/4\NE\1/4\.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
GLJPetroleum ConsultantsPrincipal Officers:Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.President & CEO                                Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.Executive Vice President & COOOfficers / Vice Presidents:Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.                              Tim R. Freeborn, P.Eng.                        Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.                 Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng.                                Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.                                 Mark Jobin, P. Geol.                                    John E. Keith, P. Eng.





LETTER OF CONSENT





TO:     Pengrowth Energy Corporation


2100, 222-3 Avenue SW


Calgary, Alberta T2P OB4


We hereby consent to the reference to our name and report evaluating Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2014 and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and (ii) the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-180888) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.


Yours truly,


GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.








/s/ "Todd J. Ikeda"


Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng


Vice President





Calgary, Alberta


February 26, 2015





4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2 • (403) 266-9500 • Fax (403) 262-1855 • GLJPC.com
U.S. Department of the Interior Submit original plus THREE copies, OMB Control No. 1010-0141

Bureau of Safety and Environmental with ONE copy marked "Public Information." OMB Approval Expires 10/31/2014

 Enforcement (BSEE)

1. PROPOSAL TO DRILL 2. BSEE OPERATOR NO. 3. OPERATOR NAME and ADDRESS

NEW WELL SIDETRACK BYPASS DEEPEN (Submitting office)

4. WELL NAME (CURRENT) 5. SIDETRACK NO. (CURRENT) 6. BYPASS NO. (CURRENT)

7. PROPOSED START DATE 8. PLAN CONTROL NO. (NEW WELL ONLY)

9. API WELL NO. (CURRENT SIDETRACK / BYPASS) (12 DIGITS)

10. Revision 11.

If revision, 

please list 

changes:

12. LEASE NO. 17. LEASE NO.

18. AREA NAME

14. BLOCK NO. 19. BLOCK NO.

15. LATITUDE 16. LONGITUDE 20. LATITUDE 21. LONGITUDE

( NAD 83 / NAD 27) ( NAD 83 / NAD 27) ( NAD 83 / NAD 27) ( NAD 83 / NAD 27)

22. NAME 23. TOP (MD) 24. TOP (TVD) 22. NAME 23. TOP (MD) 24. TOP (TVD)

25. LIST ALL ATTACHMENTS (Attach complete well prognosis + attachments required by 30 CFR 250.414 or 30 CFR 250.1617(c) and (d) as appropriate.)

26. CONTACT NAME 27. CONTACT TELEPHONE NO. 28. CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS

29. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (Type or print name) 30. TITLE

31. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE 32. DATE

APPROVED: BY TITLE

With Attached Conditions

Without Conditions

DATE

API WELL NO. ASSIGNED TO THIS WELL

BSEE FORM BSEE-0123 (October 2011- Supersedes all previous versions of this form which may not be used.) Page 1 of 2

Application for Permit to Drill (APD)

WELL AT TOTAL DEPTH (PROPOSED) WELL AT SURFACE

13. AREA NAME

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT MARKERS ANTICIPATED

THIS SPACE FOR BSEE USE ONLY
Questions Response Remarks

YES

NO

N/A

YES

NO

N/A

YES

NO

N/A

YES

NO

N/A

YES

NO

N/A

YES

NO

N/A

YES

NO

N/A

BSEE Form BSEE-0123 (October 2011 - Supersedes all previous versions of this form which may not be used.) Page 2 of 2

Application for Permit to Drill (APD) Information Sheet 

 33) Question Information Sheet

A) Will you maintain quantities of mud and mud 

material (including weight materials and additives) 

sufficient to raise the entire system mud weight 1/2 

ppg or more? 

B) If hydrocarbon-based drilling fluids were used, is 

the drilling rig outfitted for zero discharge and will 

zero discharge procedures be followed?

C) If drilling the shallow casings strings riserless, will 

you maintain kill weight mud on the rig and monitor 

the wellbore with an ROV to ensure that it is not 

flowing?

D) If requesting a waiver of the conductor casing, 

have you submitted a log to BSEE District Office 

that is with in 500 feet of the proposed bottom hole 

location for the proposed surface casing point?

G) Is the calculated daily volume possible from an 

uncontrolled blowout of this well greater than the 

daily volume included in the worst case discharge 

scenario in the approved oil spill response plan? 

E) Will the proposed operation be covered by an 

EPA Discharge Permit? (please provide permit 

number in remarks for this question)

F) Will all wells in the well bay and related 

production equipment be shut-in when moving on to 

or off of an offshore platform, or from well to well on 

the platform? If not, please explain.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

___________________ NO. 09
- 11
- 00486
- CR



### ___________________ BYRON LEON BERKLEY , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________________________________________________________ _ On A ppeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No
. 11
- 03
- 03054 CR

____________________________________________________________________ _ MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Byron Leon Berkley of engaging in organized criminal activity , enhanced, and the trial court sentenced Berkley to forty

- five years in prison. Berkley ’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On September 6, 2012 , we granted an extension of time for Berkley to file a pro

se brief. We received no response from Be rkley

. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently examined the clerk’s record and the reporter’s2 record, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. W e find it unnecessary to order appointment of new couns el to re

- brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
Howe ver, according to the judgment, the trial court assessed $ 4,330.97 in attorney’ s fees

. The record do es not indicate that Berkley has th e financial resources to
enable him to pay attorney’ s fees

. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 26.04(p) , 26.05(g) (West Supp. 201 2 ); see also Roberts v. State , 327 S.W.3d 880, 883

- 84 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont 2010, no pet.)

. Accordingly, we modify the judgment to delete the $ 4,330.97 in attorney’ s fees

. We affirm the trial court’ s judgment as modified. 1
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

________________________________ STEVE Mc KEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on December 28, 2012 Opinion Delivered February 6 , 2013 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.

1 Berkley may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankEngine Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mahmoud Hashmi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Mahmoud Hashmi



Name:

Mahmoud Hashmi

Title:

Chief Financial Officer