alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Anderson.Donaldf@epamail.epa.gov> 

To: <Smith.Maryt@epamail.epa.gov> 

CC: <Siddiqui.Ahmar@epamail.epa.gov>, Betsy Bicknell <betsy.bicknell@erg.com> 

Date: 5/4/2010 1:47 PM 

Subject: Fw: EPA Questionnaire-Alaska Seafood Processing Facilities 

From Maryt Smith/DC/USEPA/ 

To|"Joe Frazier" <Joe.Frazier@OceanBeauty.com 

Cc: Ahmar Siddiqui/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, DonaldF Anderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: |05/04/2010 07:40 AM | 

Subject: Re: EPA Questionnaire-Alaska Seafood Processing Facilities 

Mr. Frazier -- 

Thank you for contacting me. We will definitely update our records. 

Mary 

Mary T. Smith, Director 

Engineering and Analysis Division 

U.S. EPA 

1200 PA Ave., NW (4303T) 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Phone: 202-566-1056 

Fax: 202-566-1053 

http://www.epa.gov/waterscience 

From: |"Joe Frazier" <Joe.Frazier@OceanBeauty.com> 

To: Maryt Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Ahmar Siddiqui/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 05/03/2010 06:41 PM 

Subject: EPA Questionnaire-Alaska Seafood Processing Facilities 

Dear Ms. Smith, 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 4/27/10, addressed to Mr. Jim 

Yonker, regarding questionnaires sent to owners and operators of seafood 

processing facilities in certain areas of Alaska. 

For the record, your letter and questionnaires were received by Ocean 

Beauty on 4/29/10. We acknowledge that we have 45 days from date of 

receipt in which to respond, unless a request for an extension is 

submitted, per the instructions detailed in your letter. 

Also, please note that Mr. Yonker is no longer with Ocean Beauty 

Seafoods, LLC, and that I have taken his position. 

My full contact information is below. 

I would be greatly appreciated if you would update your files 

accordingly. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Joe Frazier 

Director, Corporate Food Safety, QA, and Regulatory Affairs 

Ocean Beauty Seafoods LLC 

1100 W Ewing St. 

PO Box 70739 

Seattle, WA 98127-1539 

Email: joe.frazier@oceanbeauty.com 

Main: 206-285-6800 

Direct: 206-286-2577 

Cell: 206-295-5090 

Fax: 206-281-5897 

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 

the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 

information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as 

attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 

hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 

this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) 

destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message 

immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you.
EXHIBIT 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pengrowth Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher G. Webster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 8, 2011 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher G. Webster
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Christopher G. Webster 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Wayne F. Irmiter, Vice President and Controller of CE Generation, LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 Date: November 5, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Wayne F. Irmiter
 Wayne F. Irmiter
 Vice President and Controller
 (chief accounting officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 29, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 55840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-31029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Parts 306 and 460


Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996

Correction

    In rule document 96-26495 beginning on page 54548 in the issue of 
Monday, October 21, 1996, make the following corrections:


Sec. 306.1  [Corrected]

    1. On page 54549, in the second column, in Sec. 306.1, in the third 
line, insert ``)'' after ``chapter''.


Sec. 460.1  [Corrected]

    2. On page 54549, in the third column, in Sec. 460.1, in the first 
line at the top, insert ``)'' after ``chapter''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10269

Summary Calendar

MARK ANTHONY CLARK,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; N.L. CONNORS, Warden; UNITED STATES

PENITENTIARY-LEAVENWORTH,

Respondent-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(5:03-CV-247-C)

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Anthony Clark, federal prisoner #26409-077, appeals, pro

se, the denial and dismissal of his petition seeking a writ of

coram nobis, a writ of audita querela, mandamus, and other relief

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651. 

The writ of coram nobis may be used to collaterally attack

sentences under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 or 2255 “when the petitioner has

completed his sentence and is no longer in custody”. United States

v. Dyer, 136 F.3d 417, 422 (5th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation
2

marks omitted). Because Clark remains in custody, he is not

entitled to a writ of coram nobis. 

The writ of audita querela is not available when the prisoner

has a remedy under § 2255. United States v. Banda, 1 F.3d 354, 356

(5th Cir. 1993). Neither an unsuccessful § 2255 motion nor an

inability to meet the requirements for a successive § 2255 motion

will render the § 2255 remedy unavailable. See Tolliver v. Dobre,

211 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Clark also seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the district

court to comply with this court’s prior order of remand. Mandamus

is an extraordinary remedy, available only when a petitioner

establishes: “(1) a clear right to the relief, (2) a clear duty by

the respondent to do the act requested, and (3) the lack of any

other adequate remedy”. In re Stone, 118 F.3d 1032, 1034 (5th Cir.

1997). Such relief is not available to Clark, because Clark could

have raised his claims in either a direct appeal from the

proceedings on remand or a § 2255 motion. 

Because Clark specifically disclaimed that he is seeking

relief under either 28 U.S.C. § 2241 or 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we do not

consider Clark’s brief as a motion for authorization to file a

successive § 2255 motion. 

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Spatiotemporal analysis of the Foreshock-Mainshock-Aftershock sequence of the 6 July 2017 M5.8 Lincoln, Montana, earthquake      

      November 7, 2018    

A MW 5.8 earthquake occurred on 6 July 2017 at 12.2 km depth, 11 km southeast of Lincoln in west central Montana. No major damage or injuries were reported; however, the widely felt mainshock generated a prolific aftershock sequence with more than 1200 located events through the end of 2017. The Lincoln event is the latest in a series of moderate-to-large earthquakes that have affected western Montana. We characterize the spatiotemporal evolution of the sequence using matched filter detection and multiple-event relocation techniques. Moment tensor solutions and aftershock locations indicate faulting occurred on a 9-km-long NNE-striking, near-vertical, strike-slip fault antithetic to the Lewis and Clark Line, the main through-going fault system. Seismicity primarily occurs between 6 and 16 km depth, consistent with seismicity in the Intermountain Seismic Belt. We estimate a fault rupture area of ~64 km2 and ~30 cm of average fault displacement. We identified four foreshocks in the three days prior to, and 3005 aftershocks in the three weeks following the mainshock. The supplemented catalog frequency-magnitude distribution has a b-value of 0.79 and a minimum magnitude of completeness of 0.7. The overall decay rate is consistent with a modified Omori decay law p-value of 0.76 and c-value of 0.32. This event demonstrates that unmapped faults antithetic to major geologic structures play a role in accommodating regional strain in Western Montana and can host significant earthquakes

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William L Yeck, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wyeck@usgs.gov

303-273-8648

## Related Content

#### William L Yeck, PhD

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wyeck@usgs.gov

303-273-8648

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Montana

View All **
Richard STARKS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20809]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36029; File No. SR-NYSE-95-07]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Filing and Order Granting 
Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 to 
Proposed Rule Change by New York Stock Exchange, Inc., Relating to 
Listing Standards for Options on Securities Issued in Certain Corporate 
Restructuring Transactions

Correction

    In notice document 95-19161 beginning on page 39774 in the issue of 
Thursday, August 3, 1995, make the following correction:

    On page 39778, in the the third column, above the FR document line, 
the signature line should appear as follows:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: 

AVA C. BENJAMIN,

Debtor.

_____________________________/

CASE NO. 19-bk-25801-LMI

Chapter 13

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR 

SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND OTHER PAPERS 

TO ALL PARTIES, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT:

SHAPIRO, BLASI, WASSERMAN & HERMANN, P.A., as additional counsel for 

secured creditor and interested party, LUGANO CAPITAL, INC., D/B/A “START AUTO 

FINANCE,” files this Notice of Appearance and Demand for Service of Pleadings and Other 

Papers, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §1109(b) and Rule 2002 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 

Procedure, and respectfully requests that all notices given or required to be given in this case, and 

all papers served or required to be served in this case, be provided to and served upon the 

undersigned attorney(s) at the following address:

Matthew Kish, Esq.

Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A.

7777 Glades Road, Suite 400

Boca Raton, FL 33434

Phone: 561.477.7800

Fax: 561.477.7722

Email: mkish@sbwh.law

Secondary: kgarcia@sbwh.law

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1109(b), the request 

for service of notice includes notices and papers referred to in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy

Procedure and additionally includes, without limitation, notices of any application, complaint, 

demand, hearing, motion, pleading or request, formal or informal, disclosure statement, or plan of

Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 79 Filed 07/12/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

reorganization in the above-captioned bankruptcy case, whether transmitted or conveyed by mail, 

telephone, facsimile, email or otherwise.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United 

States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in 

compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court 

set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Dated: July 12, 2021. Respectfully submitted: 

s/ Matthew S. Kish 

Matthew S. Kish, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 491640 

Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, P.A.

7777 Glades Road, Suite 400

Boca Raton, FL 33434

Phone: 561.477.7800/ Fax: 561.477.7722

Email: mkish@sbwh.law

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 12, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served upon all parties who are currently on the list to receive email notice/service for this case 

via the Court’s CM/ECF System and/or U.S. mail to the parties listed below.

s/ Matthew S. Kish

Matthew S. Kish 

Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 79 Filed 07/12/21 Page 2 of 2
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		May 16, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of SFBC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Arnold Hantman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ ARNOLDHANTMAN

Chief Executive Officer



Date: March 15, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

July 10, 2001 Session

ALVIN BATES v. DR. JOSEPH METCALF, IV, d/b/a OAK RIDGE

SURGEONS, P.C.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anderson County

No. 98LA0448 Hon. James B. Scott, Jr., Judge

FILED DECEMBER 3, 2001

No. E2001-00358-COA-R3-CV 

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the result reached by Judge Goddard in this case. Judge Susano has

filed an able Dissent on the issue of medical battery. I do not agree with the Dissent, because I

believe Dr. Metcalf properly testified about telling plaintiff that whatever he found under the

examination, if it could be fixed, he would fix it. The record establishes that plaintiff knew an anal

fissure was possible, and Dr. Metcalf testified that plaintiff expected him to fix it if it was found.

The parol evidence rule does not bar this testimony, because the written request for

surgery form sets forth that unforeseen conditions could require additional surgery, and the form

explicitly authorized such surgery to be performed. In order for the parol evidence rule to apply, the

written agreement must be intended by the parties to be a final expression of their agreement and

intended to be a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement. I cannot find that

intent from the request for surgery form, and the abovementioned provision is subject to be explained

and supplemented by oral evidence. See Strickland v. City of Lawrenceburg, 611 S.W.2d 832.

_________________________

HERSCHEL PICKENS FRANKS, J.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0270. VIOLA D. GARRIS et al. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.

On February 16, 2016, Viola D. Garris filed this pro se application for

discretionary appeal seeking review of the trial court’s January 12, 2016 order

granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss her pro se complaint for quiet title.

Although it appears from the materials before us that the trial court’s order is a

directly appealable final judgment, see OCGA § 5-6-34 (a), we lack jurisdiction to

consider Garris’s application because it is untimely.

Ordinarily, if a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable

order, we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general

rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be

appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) and (j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d

393) (1992). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court

cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle

v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Because Garris filed her

application 35 days after entry of the order she seeks to appeal,

1

the application is

untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

1Although it appears that Garris attempted to file her application earlier than

February 16, 2016, the application was not accepted because Garris failed to follow

the Court of Appeals rules.

February 26, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/26/2016
#### Hyman Siegel et al., Respondents, *v.*Council of Long Island Educators, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

July 16, 1973.

*Douglas P. Null*and *Miriam Pincus*for appellant. *Jerome B. Pleischman*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

In this small claims action, 10 plaintiffs recovered $218.68 each, based on the travel agent’s misrepresentations and failure to provide travel arrangements in Israel. Plaintiffs claimed they were deprived of three days of touring plus other inconveniences due to the apparent poor planning of the agent and his failure to make necessary and proper arrangements.

The law presently lacks clarity with respect to the relationship between the travel agency and its clients. Since the traveler who deals with a retail agent has no contact with the wholesaler, it is our opinion the retail agent must be held responsible, irrespective of any disclaimer in the brochure. In the case at bar, the disclaimer is ineffective, in any event, since the travel agent represented itself as an agent of an undisclosed principal. An *751agent is liable for his acts, even though the other party knows he is acting as an agent, if the identity of the principal is not disclosed. (See *Unger*v. *Travel Arrangements,*25 A D 2d 40, 47; *Ell Dee Clothing Co.*v. *Marsh,*247 N. Y. 392.)

The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Pittoni and McCullough, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, etc.
Jamie KNOWLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3603

  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs clinic in Sunrise, 
 Florida, as the ``William `Bill' Kling Department of Veterans Affairs 
                               Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2012

  Mr. Nelson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs clinic in Sunrise, 
 Florida, as the ``William `Bill' Kling Department of Veterans Affairs 
                               Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILLIAM ``BILL'' KLING DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs clinic located 
at 9800 West Commercial Boulevard in Sunrise, Florida, shall after the 
date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``William `Bill' Kling Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the clinic 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
William ``Bill'' Kling Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic.
                                 <all>
```