alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Past role and future outlook of the Conservation Reserve Program for supporting honey bees in the Great Plains      

      July 17, 2018    

Human dependence on insect pollinators continues to grow even as pollinators face global declines. The Northern Great Plains (NGP), a region often referred to as America’s last honey bee (Apis mellifera) refuge, has undergone rapid land-cover change due to cropland expansion and weakened land conservation programs. We conducted a trend analysis and estimated conversion rates of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) enrollments around bee apiaries from 2006 to 2016 and developed models to identify areas of habitat loss. Our analysis revealed that NGP apiaries lost over 53% of lands enrolled in the CRP, and the rate of loss was highest in areas of high apiary density. We estimated over 163,000 ha of CRP lands in 2006 within 1.6 km of apiaries was converted to row crops by 2012. We also evaluated how alternative scenarios of future CRP acreage caps may affect habitat suitability for supporting honey bee colonies. Our scenario revealed that a further reduction in CRP lands to 7.7 million ha nationally would reduce the number of apiaries in the NGP that meet defined forage criteria by 28% on average. Alternatively, increasing the national cap to 15 million ha would increase the number of NGP apiaries that meet defined forage criteria by 155%. Our scenarios also show that strategic placement of CRP lands near existing apiaries increased the number of apiaries that meet forage criteria by 182%. Our research will be useful for informing the potential consequences of future US farm bill policy and land management in the epicenter of the US beekeeping industry.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Clint Otto, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

cotto@usgs.gov

701-368-9028

## Related Content

#### Clint Otto, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

cotto@usgs.gov

701-368-9028

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States
                  - energy and wildlife
                  - wildlife program
                  - North Dakota
                  -  South Dakota

View All **
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pengrowth Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek W. Evans, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: February 24, 2016


/s/ Derek W. EvansName:  Derek W. EvansTitle:    President and Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Selected hydrologic data in the upper Colorado River basin      

      January 1, 1973    

View Sheet 1

View Sheet 2

Most of the information in this atlas pertains to the ground-water resources of the basin. The surface-water resources, climate, and geohydrologic framework have been described in considerable detail by Iorns and others (1964, 1965).

The maps in this atlas are highly generalized, and are intended to provide the reader with only a general understanding of the geology, ground-water conditions, and chemical quality of the water in the basin as a whole. In most instances, the availability, depth to, and chemical quality of ground water at a given well site can be determined only by special investigations. Only previously collected data were used to compile the maps in this atlas. More detailed information for specific parts of the basin can be found in the reports and maps in the list of references.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado River Basin
                  - Arizona
                  -  Colorado
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Predicted sex ratio of juvenile Hawksbill Seaturtles inhabiting Buck Island Reef national monument, U.S. Virgin Islands      

      January 1, 2003    

Hawksbill Seaturtles have temperature-dependent sex determination. As such, the resulting sex ratios are of conservational and ecological significance. Buck Island Reef is an interesting location for sex ratio studies since it represents a natural and unexploited foraging ground for hawksbills in the Caribbean. To examine sex ratios, blood samples were obtained from juvenile Hawksbill Seaturtles captured on Buck Island Reef over a four-year period. We used a radioimmunoassay to determine testosterone levels in those samples and compared those values to testosterone levels of juvenile hawksbills from the Caribbean whose sex has been verified by laparoscopy. The results of this study reveal a significantly female-biased sex ratio (approximately 80% female) occurs in this juvenile aggregation inhabiting Buck Island Reef.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - U.S. Virgin Islands

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

Ron Vigdor Case No.: 20-12751-MAM

Chapter 13

Debtor(s).

 / 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND

 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 9073-1(D)

I certify that a true copy of First Amended Chapter 13 Plan [DE #29] were served on June 23,

2020 as follows:

Via CM/ECF:

Office of the US Trustee

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

Robin R. Weiner, Trustee

ecf@ch13weiner.com; ecf2@ch13weiner.com

Harris J. Koroglu on behalf of Creditor IBERIABANK

hkoroglu@shutts.com, fsantelices@shutts.com;bvelapoldi@shutts.com

Gavin N Stewart on behalf of Creditor Financial Services Vehicle Trust

bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Via US Mail:

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, c/o AIS Portfolio Services, LP

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS 

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

All parties of record on creditor matrix attached hereto as Exhibit A

I further certify that I have conferred with opposing counsel in an attempt to resolve these issues

without a hearing.

Law Offices of

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 30 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 2
NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

Attorney for Debtor(s)

8551 Sunrise Blvd, Suite 208

Plantation, FL 33322

(954) 349-2265

/s/ Mitchell J. Nowack 

MITCHELL J. NOWACK, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number: 099661

/s/ Christian J. Olson 

CHRISTIAN J. OLSON, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number: 121436

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 30 Filed 06/23/20 Page 2 of 2
Mohammad MOSTAJABIAN, Petitioner, v. Behrokh AHMADI, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-2989

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion file December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50406 

Conference Calendar

 

GLEN C. JAMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

in his individual and official capacity;

MICHAEL B. DAVIS, in his individual and 

official capacity; MAURICE NEWCOMB, in his

individual and official capacity; DENNIS

L. SERATTE, in his individual and official

capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CV-248

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner Glen C. James, #660410, appeals the district

court’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights claims. 

James attempts to incorporate by reference the arguments which
No. 96-50406

- 2 -

were presented to the district court. He may not do so. See

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because

James has failed to brief any issues on appeal, he has abandoned

any issues raised in the district court. See Evans v. City of

Marlin, Tex., 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly,

James’ appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

This court has previously warned James of the possibility of

sanctions for filing frivolous lawsuits. Accordingly, James is

barred from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in

this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil

pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this court and

the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are

directed to return to James, unfiled, any attempted submission

inconsistent with this bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
Antonio JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2276

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# L_2004218EN.01001901.xml

| 18.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 218/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 218/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1130/2004

of 17 June 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004 of 19 May 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 11 to 17 June 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 28.

3

---
Kevin Lee MILLIGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0073

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION



I, James F. Carroll, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Freestone Resources, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data

---

and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: July 16, 2007



/s/  James F. Carroll

James F. Carroll

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 13999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50315]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony Victor LEROSE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
ASCA-EX10.31_2011.12.31






Exhibit 10.31
AMENDMENT TO 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 28, 2011, by and between Ameristar Casinos, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Gordon R. Kanofsky (the “Executive”). 
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects as more particularly set forth in this Amendment. 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Executive agree as follows: 
		
	1.
	Amendment to Section 4.  Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety effective as of the date hereof.


		
	2.
	Confirmation. Except as amended pursuant to this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 


[signature page follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 


	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	AMERISTAR CASINOS, INC.
	 
	EXECUTIVE:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Peter C. Walsh
	 
	 /s/ Gordon R. Kanofsky

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Name:
	 
	Peter C. Walsh
	 
	GORDON R. KANOFSKY

	Title:
	 
	Senior Vice President and
	 
	 

	 
	 
	General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 5743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40130]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TLLP EX.10.9 12.31.2011


Exhibit 10.9






2012 Incentive Compensation Program


On February 7, 2012, the Chairman of the Board and independent directors, acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors (the "Board"), approved the participation of Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC's (the "Company") President and Vice President of Operations in the Tesoro Corporation 2012 Incentive Compensation Program (the "2012 ICP" or the "2012 Program"). In addition, the Board approved the target payout for such officers. The 2012 Program consists of two equally weighted components: Tesoro Corporation's overall performance and Business Unit performance outlined below. The performance results of Tesoro Corporation and the individual business units may be adjusted to take into account unbudgeted business decisions, unusual or non-recurring items, and other factors, as approved by Tesoro Corporation's Compensation Committee, to determine the total amount, if any, available under the 2012 ICP. The Chairman of the Board and independent directors of the Company have discretion to adjust individual awards, if any, for Company executives based on their assessment of an individual executive's performance relative to successful achievement of goals, business plan execution and other leadership attributes.


Component 1 - Corporate Performance - weighted as 50% of total bonus opportunity measured against target with the range of outcomes between 0% to 200%. Tesoro Corporation performance metrics include the following:


		
	•
	Achievement of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA") measured on a margin neutral basis (this is the more heavily weighted metric, constituting 50% of the bonus opportunity for the corporate performance component);


		
	•
	Safety - Targeted improvement in recordable incidents;


		
	•
	Process Safety Management - Targeted improvement in the number of process safety incidents;


		
	•
	Environmental - Targeted improvements in the number of environmental incidents; and


		
	•
	Cost Management - Measurement of non-capital cash expenditure versus budget (this metric constitutes 35% of the bonus


opportunity for the corporate performance component).


Component 2 - Business Unit Performance - weighted as 50% of total bonus opportunity measured against target with the range
of outcomes between 0% to 200%. Business Unit performance is measured through balanced scorecards with performance metrics
including, but not limited to:


		
	•
	Safety and Environmental;


		
	•
	Cost Management;


		
	•
	Improvements in EBITDA; and


		
	•
	Business improvement and value creation initiatives.
Nathan J. PRICKETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3415

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4820 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4820

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to use the testimonials 
 of former violent extremists or their associates in order to counter 
             terrorist recruitment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combating Terrorist Recruitment Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. DIRECTIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
incorporate, to the extent practicable, into Department of Homeland 
Security efforts to combat terrorist recruitment and communications the 
public testimonials of former violent extremists or their associates, 
including friends and family. Such efforts may include the following:
            (1) Counter-messaging of foreign terrorist organization 
        communications and narratives.
            (2) Related community engagement and public education 
        efforts.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, where 
appropriate, coordinate the efforts described in subsection (a) with 
the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, as appropriate, 
and, to the extent practicable, engage nongovernmental and 
international partners in the identification and use of testimonials 
described in such subsection.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act may be construed to 
require the Secretary of Homeland Security to collect testimonials 
directly from former violent extremists or their associates, including 
friends and family.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4820

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to use the testimonials 
 of former violent extremists or their associates in order to counter 
             terrorist recruitment, and for other purposes.
```