alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4842 

To amend the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2016, to enable the payment of certain officers and employees of the 

United States whose employment is authorized under the Deferred Action 

for Childhood Arrivals program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2016 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK (for herself, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. CASTRO

of Texas, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. LEWIS, Ms. CASTOR of 

Florida, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. 

LOFGREN, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Ms. MOORE, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

RANGEL, Mr. HONDA, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. VEASEY, 

Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016, to enable the payment of certain 

officers and employees of the United States whose employment is authorized under the Deferred Action for 

Childhood Arrivals program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4842 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Dream Em3 ployment Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CERTAIN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES WHO ARE BENE5 FICIARIES OF DACA AUTHORIZED TO BE 

6 PAID. 

7 Section 704 of title VII of division E of the Consoli8 dated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114–113) is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘eligible; or’’ and inserting ‘‘eli11 gible;’’; and 

12 (2) by striking the semicolon after ‘‘owes alle13 giance to the United States’’ and inserting the fol14 lowing: ‘‘; or (5) is a person who is employed by the 

15 House of Representatives or the Senate, and has 

16 been issued an employment authorization document 

17 under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals 

18 Program of the Secretary of Homeland Security, es19 tablished pursuant to the memorandum from the 

20 Secretary of Homeland Security entitled ‘Exercising 

21 Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals 

22 Who Came to the United States as Children’, dated 

23 June 15, 2012:’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04211**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04211\04211_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04211\04211_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04211\04211_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04211\04211_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04211\04211_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04211\04211_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04211\04211_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04211\04211_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04211\04211_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 04211\Supplemental Documents\04211_Water Flow Diagram (Scanned).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04211\Supplemental Documents\Certification Statement Plant ID 04211.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 04211\Supplemental Documents\04211_Site Boundary.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04211\Supplemental Documents\04211_SitePlanDetails.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Gregory TOLLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

Gregory Tolliver, Panama City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Tolliver, Appellant, appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, arguing, among other things, that the lower court has not conclusively refuted his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call exculpatory witnesses at trial. We agree and reverse as to that claim. We affirm the trial court's summary denial as to Appellant's other claims.

Appellant was convicted at trial of stealing a diamond ring while he and another man, Christopher Johnson, were painting the victim's house. At trial, the State presented the testimony of only three witnesses-the victim, a detective, and Johnson. Appellant's theory of defense was that Johnson stole the ring, and that Appellant forcefully retrieved the ring from Johnson so that he could return it to the victim.

In his post-conviction motion, Appellant alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call two witnesses. The first proposed witness was the victim's neighbor, Mr. Taylor, who Appellant alleges would have testified that he saw Johnson enter the victim's residence while both the victim and Appellant were away purchasing supplies.

The second proposed witness was a woman named Gina, who Appellant told police is a hairdresser living in The Villages. Appellant alleged that Gina would have testified that she saw Appellant forcefully retrieve the diamond ring from Johnson.

The trial court summarily denied Appellant's motion reasoning that the testimony of these proposed witnesses conflicted with the testimony of other witnesses at trial. As to Mr. Taylor, the trial court summarily denied the claim because, although the victim allegedly told Appellant that Mr. Taylor saw someone enter the residence while Appellant was away, the victim later testified that he made that story up as a bluff to get his ring back. As to the second witness, the trial court reasoned that Gina's proposed testimony would have conflicted with Johnson's testimony-the very person Appellant identified as the actual perpetrator.

Given the nature of the evidence presented at trial, and assuming that the proposed witnesses will testify as Appellant alleges, we conclude that this case appears to turn on a credibility determination between the testimony of the victim and Johnson for the State and that of Appellant's proposed witnesses. *See**Payne v. State* , 21 So.3d 900, 902 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). In such a case, Appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing, or the attachment of records that conclusively refute Appellant's claim. *Id.*

REVERSED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., and EISNAUGLE, J., concur.

BERGER, J., concurs in result only.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 212 (Thursday, October 31, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 56271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-31031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 1852


Rewrite of the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS)

Correction

    In rule document 96-25189 beginning on page 52325 in the issue of 
Monday, October 7, 1996 make the following corrections:


1852.215-84  [Corrected]

    1. On page 52344, in the second column, the amendatory instruction 
11. ``As prescribed in 1815.7003, insert the following clause:'' should 
read ``Section 1852.215-84 is revised to read as follows:''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, after amendatory 
instruction 11., insert the section heading:


1852.215-84   Ombudsman.

    3. On the same page, in the same column, in the space under the 
newly inserted section heading, and above ``Ombudsman (October 1996)'' 
insert ``As prescribed in 1815.7003, insert the following clause:''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4804 

To provide for a task force within the FBI to deal with certain malicious 

and false threats in order made to obtain a response by law enforcement, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a task force within the FBI to deal with 

certain malicious and false threats in order made to 

obtain a response by law enforcement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Swatting in Our 

5 Schools Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TASK FORCE TO PREVENT SWATTING. 

7 (a) CREATION.—The Director of the Federal Bureau 

8 of Investigation shall create a Task Force to combat swatVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:00 Mar 18, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4804.IH H4804

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4804 IH

1 ting by investigating and referring for prosecution Federal 

2 offenses involved in this activity. 

3 (b) DEFINITION OF SWATTING.—The term ‘‘swat4 ting’’ means activity of individuals who through the use 

5 of the mail, telephone, or other instrument of interstate 

6 or foreign commerce, or in or affecting interstate or for7 eign commerce, willfully makes any threat, or maliciously 

8 conveys false information knowing the same to be false, 

9 concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made, or 

10 to be made, to kill, injure, or intimidate any individual 

11 or unlawfully to damage or destroy any building, vehicle, 

12 or other real or personal property by means of fire or an 

13 explosive with the intent to trigger a response by a law 

14 enforcement agency in the absence of circumstances re15 quiring such a response. 

16 (c) SWATTING CONSIDERED DOMESTIC TER17 RORISM.—For the purposes of its activities, the Task 

18 Force created under this section shall deem swatting to 

19 be a form of domestic terrorism. 

20 (d) COORDINATION WITH THE JOINT TERRORISM

21 TASK FORCES.—The task force created under this section 

22 shall coordinate its activities with the Joint Terrorism 

23 Task Forces. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4804 IH

1 (e) AUTHORIZATION.—There are authorized to be ap2 propriated to carry out this section such sums as may be 

3 necessary. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary report on the USGS-NASA Langley Corehole -- the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater Project: A. Operational summary for the USGS -- NASA Langley Corehole, Hampton, Virginia. B. Preliminary geologic summary for the USGS -- NASA Langley Corehol, Hampto      

      December 1, 2001    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Laurel M. Bybell

##### Micropaleontologist Emeritus

Office of Science Quality and Integrity

lbybell@usgs.gov

703-648-5281

#### Thomas Cronin, Ph.D.

##### Senior Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

tcronin@usgs.gov

703-648-6363

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

#### J. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

whorton@usgs.gov

703-648-6933

#### J. Stephen Schindler

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

sschindl@usgs.gov

703-648-5970

#### Robert Weems

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

rweems@usgs.gov

703-648-6930

## Related Content

#### Laurel M. Bybell

##### Micropaleontologist Emeritus

Office of Science Quality and Integrity

lbybell@usgs.gov

703-648-5281

#### Thomas Cronin, Ph.D.

##### Senior Geologist

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

tcronin@usgs.gov

703-648-6363

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

#### J. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

whorton@usgs.gov

703-648-6933

#### J. Stephen Schindler

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

sschindl@usgs.gov

703-648-5970

#### Robert Weems

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

rweems@usgs.gov

703-648-6930

### Contacts

#### Laurel M. Bybell

##### Micropaleontologist Emeritus

Office of Science Quality and Integrity

lbybell@usgs.gov

703-648-5281
David Kelly BREWSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 4th day of January, 2006.


                            By:  /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive Officer,
                                     President and Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon
request.
Thomas RAUCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1



MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES



|                                         |  |                              
|---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Agile Canadian Holdings, Inc.            |  | Delaware                     
|Agile International Holdings, LLC        |  | Delaware                     
|Agile Software (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.        |  | China                        
|Agile Software AG                        |  | Switzerland                  
|Agile Software Enterprise Pvt. Ltd.      |  | India                        
|Agile Software GmbH                      |  | Austria                      
|Agile Software GmbH                      |  | Germany                      
|Agile Software International Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|Agile Software KK                        |  | Japan                        
|Agile Software Limited                   |  | Taiwan                       
|Agile Software Limited                   |  | UK                           
|Cimmetry Systems Corporation             |  | Nova Scotia, Canada
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

NORA COMBS,1

 

Respondent Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

DEREK WYNN, 

Petitioner Below, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ No. 433, 2019 

§ 

§ Court Below—Family Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ File No. CN18-01054 

§ Petition No. 19-19013 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 

Submitted: December 31, 2019 

 Decided: January 10, 2020 

ORDER 

On December 17, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, by certified 

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed 

for her failure to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript fee. The appellant 

has failed to respond to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action is therefore 

deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice 

 

1

 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
# National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, 2009

 From violence in our neighborhoods to credit card fraud on the Internet, Americans fall victim to countless crimes every day. Our Nation has no higher responsibility than protecting the safety of our families. During National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, we honor crime victims by pledging to fight crime wherever it exists.

 This commitment begins by supporting the men and women working every day to reduce crime and assist crime victims. Often placing themselves in harm’s way and sacrificing personal interests, these individuals are the backbone of the extensive efforts to protect Americans from crime. They have demonstrated a commitment to serve others, and their dedication is vital to implementing a successful strategy for crime reduction and victim assistance.

 Crime victims have benefited from the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-473), one of the most significant achievements in crime victim assistance. This law created an innovative method for using fines and penalties from Federal criminals to fund services for victims. This Crime Victims Fund has already helped millions of victims across the country access basic assistance and financial compensation. This year marks the 25th anniversary of the bill’s bipartisan passage.

 An effective approach to fighting crime must include programs that make sense and work. To that end, my Administration is building on past achievements to address the range of crimes that Americans may encounter. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which I signed in February, helps State and local law enforcement personnel perform critical work by providing $2 billion through the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program.

 A smart crime reduction strategy must also incorporate outreach to those who have paid their debt to society and have become responsible and contributing members of their communities. Prisoner reentry programs have been tested and proven effective. Through a number of supportive services, including substance abuse and mental health counseling, prison-to-work incentives, job training, and transitional assistance, reentry programs help reduce crime recidivism and keep families safer. By utilizing common-sense and proven methods, we can both reduce crime and serve crime victims.

 NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 26 through May 2, 2009, as National Crime Victims’ Rights Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this week by participating in events that raise awareness of victims’ rights and services and by volunteering to serve victims in their time of need.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E9-9987

Billing code 3195-W9-P
Phillip L. AUSTIN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 1, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 51319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-31001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANCE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-37524; File No. SR-Phlx-96-29]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate 
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock 
Exchange, Inc., Extending the Pilot Program for Equity and Index Option 
Specialist Enhanced Parity Participants

August 5, 1996.

Correction

    In notice document 96-20575 beginning on page 42080 in the issue of 
Tuesday, August 13, 1996, in the third column, in the first line, the 
release number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary volcano-hazard assessment for Mount Spurr Volcano, Alaska      

      January 1, 2001    

View Document

View Plate

Mount Spurr volcano is an ice- and snow-covered stratovolcano complex located in the north-central Cook Inlet region about 100 kilometers west of Anchorage, Alaska. Mount Spurr volcano consists of a breached stratovolcano, a lava dome at the summit of Mount Spurr, and Crater Peak vent, a small stratocone on the south flank of Mount Spurr volcano. Historical eruptions of Crater Peak occurred in 1953 and 1992. These eruptions were relatively small but explosive, and they dispersed volcanic ash over areas of interior, south-central, and southeastern Alaska. Individual ash clouds produced by the 1992 eruption drifted east, north, and south. Within a few days of the eruption, the south-moving ash cloud was detected over the North Atlantic. Pyroclastic flows that descended the south flank of Crater Peak during both historical eruptions initiated volcanic-debris flows or lahars that formed temporary debris dams across the Chakachatna River, the principal drainage south of Crater Peak. Prehistoric eruptions of Crater Peak and Mount Spurr generated clouds of volcanic ash, pyroclastic flows, and lahars that extended to the volcano flanks and beyond. A flank collapse on the southeast side of Mount Spurr generated a large debris avalanche that flowed about 20 kilometers beyond the volcano into the Chakachatna River valley. The debris-avalanche deposit probably formed a large, temporary debris dam across the Chakachatna River.

The distribution and thickness of volcanic-ash deposits from Mount Spurr volcano in the Cook Inlet region indicate that volcanic-ash clouds from most prehistoric eruptions were as voluminous as those produced by the 1953 and 1992 eruptions. Clouds of volcanic ash emitted from the active vent, Crater Peak, would be a major hazard to all aircraft using Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport and other local airports and, depending on wind direction, could drift a considerable distance beyond the volcano. Ash fall from future eruptions could disrupt many types of economic and social activities, including oil and gas operations and shipping activities in the Cook Inlet area. Eruptions of Crater Peak could involve significant amounts of ice and snow that would lead to the formation of large lahars, formation of volcanic debris dams, and downstream flooding. The greatest hazards in order of importance are described below and shown on plate 1.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Mount Spurr Volcano
                  - Alaska

View All **