alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

           Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Robert E. Dolan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lynch Interactive
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal  control over financial
reporting  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(f) and  15d-15(f))  for the
registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report) that has  significantly  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to
significantly   affect,   the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2005


/s/ Robert E. Dolan
-------------------
Robert E. Dolan
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 3****2****.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer(s) of Mastermind, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies to his or her knowledge that the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2019 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: January 14, 2020

 

|   /s/ Daniel A. Dodson |
|-----------------------------|

Daniel A. Dodson

Chief Executive Officer and President

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No: 19-26821-JKO

 Chapter 13

KATRINA LYNN VALENTINO

 Debtor. /

DEBTORS’ MOTION TO PAY 5% INTEREST ON PRIORITY CLAIM FILED BY 

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY – INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

The Debtor, KATRINA LYNN PETRISKO, by and through undersigned counsel, file this 

Motion to Pay 5% Interest on Priority Claim Filed by the Department of the Treasury – Internal 

Revenue Service and state the following:

1. On December 17, 2019, the Debtor filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the 

Bankruptcy Code.

2. The Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service (the “Internal Revenue 

Service”) has not yet filed a timely Proof of Claim, however, the Debtor believes to have 

liability to the Internal Revenue Service in the amount of $3,576.33.

3. The governmental bar date has not yet been established, but the Debtor wishes, in good 

faith, to provide payment to the Internal Revenue Service based on expected tax liability.

4. The Debtor wishes to pay the 5% interest to the Internal Revenue Service within the plan 

as this non-dischargeable debt may severely hamper their ability to effectually reorganize 

and jeopardizes their fresh start should the increase not be permitted.

5. In the event that the Internal Revenue Service amends its’ claim, the Debtor retains her

right to either: file a Motion to Amend the Order on the instant Motion; file a Motion to 

Modify Plan in order to adjust the amount accordingly; or to file an Objection to the 

Amended Proof of Claim.

Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 10 Filed 12/17/19 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, the Debtor requests the entry of an Order allowing her to pay the 

Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service a 5% interest on the priority claim amount 

through the Chapter 13 plan and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted on this 17th day of December 2019

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

330 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

(954) 765-3166

(954) 756-7103 (facsimile)

chad@cvhlawgroup.com

By: /s/ Chad Van Horn, Esq.

Chad Van Horn, Esq.

 FL Bar 64500

Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 10 Filed 12/17/19 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The removal kinetics of dissolved organic matter and the optical clarity of groundwater      

      January 1, 2016    

Concentrations of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and ultraviolet/visible light absorbance decrease systematically as groundwater moves through the unsaturated zones overlying aquifers and along flowpaths within aquifers. These changes occur over distances of tens of meters (m) implying rapid removal kinetics of the chromophoric DOM that imparts color to groundwater. A one-compartment input-output model was used to derive a differential equation describing the removal of DOM from the dissolved phase due to the combined effects of biodegradation and sorption. The general solution to the equation was parameterized using a 2-year record of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration changes in groundwater at a long-term observation well. Estimated rates of DOC loss were rapid and ranged from 0.093 to 0.21 micromoles per liter per day (μM d−1), and rate constants for DOC removal ranged from 0.0021 to 0.011 per day (d−1). Applying these removal rate constants to an advective-dispersion model illustrates substantial depletion of DOC over flow-path distances of 200 m or less and in timeframes of 2 years or less. These results explain the low to moderate DOC concentrations (20–75 μM; 0.26–1 mg L−1) and ultraviolet absorption coefficient values (a254 < 5 m−1) observed in groundwater produced from 59 wells tapping eight different aquifer systems of the United States. The nearly uniform optical clarity of groundwater, therefore, results from similarly rapid DOM-removal kinetics exhibited by geologically and hydrologically dissimilar aquifers.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           

February 16, 2016

####                 Data release for journal article entitled Removal Kinetics of Dissolved Organic Matter and the Optical Clarity of Groundwater - Supporting Data              

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

## Related Content

February 16, 2016

####                 Data release for journal article entitled Removal Kinetics of Dissolved Organic Matter and the Optical Clarity of Groundwater - Supporting Data              

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Connecticut
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Illinois
                  -  Nebraska
                  -  South Carolina
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah

View All **
Exhibit 31.1



Certification



I, Paul Jarman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of UCN, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul Jarman        
|                     |  |     |  | Paul Jarman            
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Case 20-12462-LMI Doc 82 Filed 05/05/22 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE>        5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                               58,401
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     69,769
<PP&E>                               31,974
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      632,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               464,014
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             11,393
<OTHER-SE>                          156,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        632,296
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       821,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (17)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (821,767)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (821,767)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (821,767)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.07)


</TABLE>
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC.

DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT

FOR

JERRY E. SHERIDAN




Jerry E. Sheridan is President and Chief Executive Officer of AmeriGas Propane, Inc., the general
partner of AmeriGas Partners, L.P. Mr. Sheridan has an oral agreement with AmeriGas Propane, Inc.
which includes the following:



Mr. Sheridan:




	 	1.	 	has an annual base salary of $450,000, effective March 3, 2012 (reflects Mr. Sheridan’s
promotion in March 2012);






	 	2.	 	participates in AmeriGas Propane, Inc.’s annual bonus plan, with bonus payable based on
the achievement of pre-approved financial and/or business performance objectives, which
support business plans and strategic goals;






	 	3.	 	participates in AmeriGas Propane, Inc.’s long-term compensation plans, the 2010
Long-Term Incentive Plan, with annual awards as determined by the Compensation/Pension
Committee, and UGI Corporation’s 2004 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, with annual awards
as determined by the UGI Corporation Compensation and Management Development Committee;






	 	4.	 	will receive cash benefits upon termination of his employment without cause following a
change in control of AmeriGas Propane, Inc., AmeriGas Partners, L.P. or UGI Corporation;
and






	 	5.	 	participates in AmeriGas Propane, Inc.’s benefit plans, including the AmeriGas Propane,
Inc. Senior Executive Employee Severance Plan and the AmeriGas Propane, Inc. Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Lunar basin formation and highland stratigraphy      

      December 31, 1974    

Multiring impact basins, formed after solidification of the lunar crust, account for most or all premare regional deposits and structures expressed in the lunar landscape and for major topographic and gravity variations. A fresh basin has two or more concentric mountain rings, a lineated ejecta blanket, and secondary impact craters. Crackled material on the floor may be impact melt. The ejecta blanket was emplaced at least partly as a ground‐hugging flow and was probably hot. A suggested model of basin formation is that the center lifts up and the rings form by inward collapse during evisceration. The resulting basin is shallow and has a central uplift of the mantle. This results in a central gravity high and a ring low. Later flooding by mare basalt has since modified most near side basins. Highland deposits of plains, furrowed and pitted terrain, and various hills, domes, and craters that were interpreted before the Apollo missions as being volcanic can now be interpreted as being basin related. A province map of the whole moon shows that the relatively young Orientale and Imbrium basins imprinted and rejuvenated much of the moon's surface; older basins must have also. The most primitive cratered surface remaining is mostly on the far side, distant from Imbrium and Orientale and other large relatively young basins. All five lunar landings in the highlands sampled stratigraphic units probably related to basins. Several nearly obliterated basins have been discovered recently, including a deep one on the far side that is as wide as the moon's radius. The presence of these ancient basins suggests that the surface is effectively saturated by basins and that many others were completely destroyed by later impacts. Basin impacts may have churned the lunar crust to large depths.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Keith A Howard

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

khoward@usgs.gov

650-439-2843

## Related Content

#### Keith A Howard

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

khoward@usgs.gov

650-439-2843

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

              Editorial Note            

#### Editorial Note:

FR Doc. 04-4809 originally published in the issue of Wednesday, March 3, 2004 at 69 FR 10043. This document is being republished because the agency name was printed and indexed incorrectly. This document is being reprinted in its entirety.

# Agency:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

* * * * *

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, March 23, 2004, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

1201 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC (EPA East Building, room 1153).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Note:

Early arrival: Those attending are advised to arrive early for registration and security check.

# Purpose:

Organizational plans for the newly established United States Election Assistance Commission.

# Person to Contact for Information:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 694-1095.

DeForest B. Soaries, Jr.,

Chairman, United States Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-4809  Filed 3-5-04; 10:12 am]

              Editorial Note            

#### Editorial Note:

FR Doc. 04-4809 originally published in the issue of Wednesday, March 3, 2004 at 69 FR 10043. This document is being republished because the agency name was printed and indexed incorrectly. This document is being reprinted in its entirety.

[FR Doc. R4-4809  Filed 3-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Edwin L. DEMPS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Limits to coseismic landslides triggered by Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquakes      

      October 2, 2022    

Landslides are a significant hazard and dominant feature throughout the landscape of the Pacific Northwest. However, the hazard and risk posed by coseismic landslides triggered by great Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) earthquakes is highly uncertain due to a lack of local and global data. Despite a wealth of other geologic evidence for past earthquakes on the Cascadia Subduction Zone, no landslides have been definitively linked to such earthquakes, even in areas otherwise highly susceptible to failure. While shallow landslides may not leave a lasting topographical signature in the landscape, there are thousands of deep-seated landslides in Cascadia, and these deposits often persist for hundreds of years and multiple earthquake cycles. Synthesizing newly developed inventories of dated large deep-seated landslides in the Oregon Coast Range, we use statistical methods to estimate the proportion of these types of landslides that could have been triggered during past great Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquakes. Statistical analysis of high-precision dendrochronology ages of landslide-dammed lakes and surface roughness-dated bedrock landslides reveal Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquakes may have triggered 0–15 % of large deep-seated landslides in the Oregon Coast Range over multiple earthquake cycles. Our results refine estimates from previous studies and further suggest that coseismic triggering accounts for a small fraction of the total deep-seated bedrock landslides mapped in coastal Cascadia. However, if the real rate of coseismic landslide triggering during CSZ earthquakes is near our estimated upper bound for the 1700 CSZ earthquake, we estimate up to 2400 coseismic large deep-seated landslides could occur in the Oregon Coast Range in a single earthquake. These findings suggest Cascadia is consistent with global observations from other subduction zones and that coseismic landslides may still represent a serious geohazard in the region.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Alex Grant

##### Research Civil Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

agrant@usgs.gov

650-329-5205

#### Sean Lahusen, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

slahusen@usgs.gov

1-888-275-8747

## Related Content

#### Alex Grant

##### Research Civil Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

agrant@usgs.gov

650-329-5205

#### Sean Lahusen, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

slahusen@usgs.gov

1-888-275-8747

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon
                  - Oregon Coast Range

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------