alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         90,162
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  39,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    26,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,771
<PP&E>                                         1,783,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (413,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,001,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,379
<BONDS>                                        1,156,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,001,175
<SALES>                                        91,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               94,470
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  67,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,354
<INCOME-TAX>                                   388
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,966
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Richard Ferguson certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CoConnect, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  April 17, 2007
Exhibit 10.5


 


SCHEDULE IDENTIFYING MATERIAL DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS


BETWEEN NAVIDEA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
AND


THE INDIVIDUALS LISTED BELOW


 





		 	Commencement 
Date	 	 	Termination 
Date	 	 	2012 Base 
Salary	 	 	Amount of 
Severance	 	 	Amount of 
Severance 
upon Change in 
Control	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mark J. Pykett	 	 	4/15/2011	 	 	 	10/15/2012	 	 	$	425,000	 	 	$	468,750	 	 	$	937,500	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Thomas H. Tulip	 	 	6/1/2011	 	 	 	5/31/2012	 	 	$	300,000	 	 	$	225,000	 	 	$	450,000	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Frederick O. Cope	 	 	1/1/2011	 	 	 	12/31/2012	 	 	$	271,000	 	 	$	245,000	 	 	$	367,500	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Brent L. Larson	 	 	1/1/2011	 	 	 	12/31/2012	 	 	$	265,000	 	 	$	207,000	 	 	$	310,500	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Rodger A. Brown	 	 	1/1/2011	 	 	 	12/31/2012	 	 	$	191,000	 	 	$	165,000	 	 	$	247,500
Edmund M. KLUBECK and Cheryl A. Battaglino, Appellants, v. CCRC PROPCO-CYPRESS VILLAGE LLC, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3021

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Juan C. Velasquez ANDRES, Appellant, v. Maura Godinez PEREZ, Appellee.

No. 4D18-691

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Eddie WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-2580

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of EcoEnergy Corporation (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, KELLY T. HICKEL, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





/s/ KELLY T.
      HICKELName:
            
            Kelly
      T. HickelDate:
            
            November
      23, 2009
Filed 3 / 4 / 24 P. v. Lindahl CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

BLAKE AARON LINDAHL

,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B 3 2 8533

(Super. Ct. No. 20210 10288 )

( Ventura County)

Blake Aaron Lindahl appeals an order revoking probation

and committing him to jail after he pleaded guilty to two counts

of grand theft. (Penal Code, § 487 , subd. (a).) 1 He received a

sixteen

- month lower term on the first count and a consecutive

eight

- month term on a second. The charges arose from

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless

stated otherwise.2

appellant’s theft of electronics and other merchandise from a

Simi Valley Target store. 2

The court init ially released appellant on a mental health

diversion but resumed criminal proceedings when he failed to

report to his program

. He pleaded guilty and received a

suspended sentence and probation. Appellant twice violated the

terms of probation and failed to remand to serve jail time

imposed by the court.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.

After reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues

. W e advised appellant on December 18 , 2023 that he ha d 30 days

within whi ch to personally submit any contentions or issues he

wished us to consider. We received no response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that

appellant ’ s counsel fully complied with his responsibilities and

that no arguable issue exists. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436

, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126 .)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

CODY , J.

We concur :

G ILBERT

, P. J. YEGAN , J.

2 The facts are derived from the probation report because

appellant pleaded guilty to the charges

.3 Derek D. Malan , Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon

, under appointment by the Court of

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10323]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Wage and Hour Division

29 CFR Part 500


Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Regulations

CFR Correction

    In title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 500 to 899, 
revised as of July 1, 1994, Sec. 500.268 appearing on page 50 should be 
removed and the following Sec. 500.268 inserted:


Sec. 500.268  Final decision of the Secretary.

    (a) The Secretary's final Decision and Order shall be issued within 
120 days from the notice of intent granting the petition, and served 
upon all parties and the Chief Administrative Law Judge, in person or 
by certified mail.
    (b) Upon receipt of an Order of the Secretary modifying or vacating 
the Decision and Order of an Administrative Law Judge, the Chief 
Administrative Law Judge shall substitute such Order for the Decision 
and Order of the Administrative Law Judge.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements



 Exhibit 10(k)A 
 SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 
 In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing Change in Control Employment Agreements by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and the following employees as exhibits to this Form 10-K because they are substantially identical to the Form of
Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, which is filed as Exhibit 10 (j) to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

David C. Elder 
 John P. Jacunski

 Michael L. Korniczky 

Debabrata Mukherjee 
 Dante C. Parrini

 Martin Rapp 
 Mark A.
Sullivan 
 William T. Yanavitch II
64342 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 233 / Monday, December 7, 2009 / The Regulatory Plan 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION (GSA) 

Statement of Regulatory and 

Deregulatory Priorities 

The General Services Administration 

(GSA) establishes agency acquisition 

rules and guidance through the General 

Services Acquisition Regulation 

(GSAR), which contains agency 

acquisition policies and practices, 

contract clauses, solicitation provisions, 

and forms that control the relationship 

between GSA and contractors and 

prospective contractors. 

GSA’s fiscal year 2010 regulatory 

priority is to continue with the complete 

rewrite of the GSAR. GSA is rewriting 

the GSAR to maintain consistency with 

the Federal Acquisition Regulation 

(FAR), and to implement streamlined 

and innovative acquisition procedures 

that contractors, offerors, and GSA 

contracting personnel can utilize when 

entering into and administering 

contractual relationships. 

GSA will clarify the GSAR to— 

• Provide consistency with the FAR; 

• Eliminate coverage which duplicates 

the FAR or creates inconsistencies 

within the GSAR; 

• Correct inappropriate references 

listed to indicate the basis for the 

regulation; 

• Rewrite sections which have become 

irrelevant because of changes in 

technology or business processes, or 

which place unnecessary 

administrative burdens on contractors 

and the Government; 

• Streamline or simplify the regulation; 

• Roll up coverage from the services 

and regions/zones which should be in 

the GSAR; 

• Provide new and/or augmented 

coverage; and 

• Delete unnecessary burdens on small 

businesses. 

BILLING CODE 6820–34–S 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 164 (Thursday, August 22, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30822]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Comparator Systems Corp; Order of Suspension of Trading

Correction

    In notice document 96-12468 appearing on page 24843 in the issue of 
Thursday, May 16, 1996 make the following correction:
    In the second column, under the subject heading ``Comparator 
Systems Corp; Order of Suspension of Trading'' insert ``May 14, 
1996.''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Selected hydrologic data for Juab Valley, Utah, 1935-94      

      August 1, 1995    

View Document

View Plate

This report contains selected hydrologic data collected in Juab Valley, Utah, from 1935 to 1994. The study area is in eastern Juab County in central Utah. The area is bounded on the east by the Wasatch Range and San Pitch Mountains and on the west by Long Ridge and West Hills. A ground-water divide exists south of Levan Ridge, a topographic divide that separates the valley into northern and southern parts. The area is in the Basin and Range Physiographic Province described by Fenneman (1931) and includes about 171 square miles of basin-fill deposits (pl. 1).

Most of the data in this report were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Central Utah Water Conservancy District and the East Juab Water Conservancy District. Some of the earlier data were published previously by Bjorklund (1967) and Bjorklund and Robinson (1968). Some well-location names have been changed from those published previously because new larger-scale maps allow location to be plotted more accurately. The changes are footnoted in the tables.

The purpose of this report is to provide hydrologic data for use by the general public and by officials managing the water resources of the area and to supplement interpretive reports for the area. Selected well, spring, surface-water, and rock-sample data are reported in tables 1 to 10. Selected data, including well depth and water level, are reported for 283 wells, and results of chemical analyses are reported for samples from 74 wells, 15 springs, and 7 surface-water sites. The numbering system used in Utah for hydrologic data sites is shown in figure 1. Locations of the hydrologic-data sites and the rock-sample site are shown on plate 1. Discharge-measurement sites on Salt Creek, on selected canals, and in the West Creek area are shown in figure 2.

These data could not have been collected without the cooperation of local residents and officials of irrigation companies and municipalities that permitted access to their wells, springs, and property.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 19117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50414]



                                                    VOL. 60, NO. 72

                                             Friday, April 14, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 72/Friday, April 14, 1995/Corrections
[[Page 19117]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER94-1475-000, et al.]


Illinova Power Marketing, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and 
Corporate Regulation Filings

Correction

    In notice document 95-8541 beginning on page 17781, in the issue of 
Friday, April 7, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 17782, in the second column, under the heading ``Prairie 
Wind Energy Partners'', in the first line, the Docket Number should 
read ``QF95-198-000''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# L_2004335EN.01000301.xml

| 11.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1939/2004

of 10 November 2004

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 November 2004 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of December 2004 for 5 197,773 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**RODNEY JERMAINE JOHNSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 172 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 2nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PORTAL NET LIMITED FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>