alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         21,00
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,581)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)


</TABLE>
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier: 

### 2010

- NE

- 38

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and th en out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labo r + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet 

### Inspection 7.0 $ 595.00 $15,800 $16,395.00 

### 110 $1,803,450.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,803,450 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### Special considerations for Economic A **nalysis** ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA

-IR

-M

- 8040.1C

. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation:

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** W ill the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to i nclude specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30210]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ex103_mccrosson.htm






  





  











  








CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.


60 Heartland Blvd.


Edgewood, New York 11717












November 4, 2011












Mr. Douglas McCrosson












Dear Mr. McCrosson:







This letter will serve to amend the Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”), dated as of December 16, 2009, between you and CPI Aerostructures, Inc.


 


1.  The first sentence of Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:







“The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on January 1, 2010 and shall continue until December 31, 2014 (“Term”) unless terminated earlier as hereinafter provided in this Agreement, or unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Company and Executive.”


 


2.  The first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:







 


“The Company shall pay to Executive a salary (“Base Salary”) at the annual rate of: (i) $190,000 from January 1, 2010 until December 31, 2010; (ii) $220,000 from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011; and (iii) $240,000 from January 1, 2012 until December 31, 2012; (v) $253,000 from January 1, 2013 until December 31, 2013; and (vi) $265,000 from January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2014.”


 


3.  The first sentence of Section 3.2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:


 


“In addition to Base Salary, for each of the years ending December 31, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, Executive shall be paid a bonus (“Bonus”) to be calculated in the manner set forth on Schedule A annexed hereto.”


 


Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 






  





  











  








Please sign this letter in the place below to confirm your agreement.


 


Sincerely,







CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.













	
By:

	
/s/ Edward J. Fred


	  	
Edward J. Fred


	  	
Chief Executive Officer

















AGREED TO:








	
/s/ Douglas McCrosson


	
Douglas McCrosson
**Exhibit 10.22**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO**

**MYSPACE, INC.**

**2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE MYSPACE, INC. 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (this “First Amendment”), dated as of April4, 2005, is made and adopted by MySpace, Inc. (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below). 

 

**RECITALS**

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the MySpace, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect the four-for-onestock split of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock and to increase the number of Shares of Common Stock of the Company subject thereto; and 

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended by the Board from time to time. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be amended as follows:

 

1. The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is herebyamended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following sentence: 

 

“Subject to the provisions of Section 13 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon exercise of such Options or Stock Purchase Rights is 1,606,472 Shares.” 

 

2. The first clause of Section 6(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deletingit in its entirety and replacing it with the following sentence: 

 

“No Service Provider shall be granted, in any calendar year, Options or Stock Purchase Rights to purchase more than Eight Hundred Thousand (800,000) Shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 13 of the Plan);”

 

3. This First Amendment shall be effective as of the datehereof, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders. 

 

4. This First Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. 

 

5. Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

*(Signature Page Follows)*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have caused the foregoing First Amendment to be approved by theirofficers duly authorized on this 4th day of April, 2005. 

 
MYSPACE, INC.
a Delaware corporation

By:
 
/s/    CHRISTOPHER DEWOLFE
  
Christopher DeWolfe
  
President

I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors ofMySpace, Inc. on March 3, 2005. 

 

Executed on this 4th day of April, 2005. 

 

By:
 
/s/    CHRISTOPHER DEWOLFE
  
Christopher DeWolfe
  
President

 

* * * * * * * * *

 

I hereby certify that the foregoing First Amendment was dulyadopted by the stockholders of MySpace, Inc. on March 25, 2005. 

 

Executed on this 4th day of April, 2005. 

 

By:
 
/s/    JOSH BERMAN
  
Josh Berman
  
Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Year Ended  December  31, 2007 (the  "Report")  by National
Coal Corp.  ("Registrant"),  each of the  undersigned  hereby  certifies  to his
knowledge that:

1.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Registrant.


Date: April 15, 2008                         /S/ DANIEL A. ROLING
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Daniel A. Roling
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 15, 2008                         /S/ MICHAEL R. CASTLE
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Michael R. Castle
                                             Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0550 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MISTY JUNE MILLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 23, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 17 2022

08/17/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0550
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 6669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02286]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8618]

Department of State FY12 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of the release of the Department of State FY 12 Service 
Contract Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has publically released its Service 
Contract Inventory for FY 13 and its analysis of the FY 12 inventory. 
They are available here: http://csm.state.gov/content.asp?content_id=135&menu_id=71.
    Section 743 of Division C of the FY 2010 Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, Public Law 111-117, requires Department of State, 
and other civilian agencies, to submit an annual inventory of service 
contracts. A service contract inventory is a tool to assess an agency 
in its ability to contract services in support of its mission and 
operation and whether the contractors' skills are being utilized in an 
appropriate manner.

DATES: The FY 13 inventory and FY 12 analysis is available on the 
Department's Web site as of January 30, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Thomas, Division Chief, A/EX/
CSM, 202-485-7190, BarryTD2@state.gov.

    Dated: January 30, 2014.
Barry Thomas,
Division Chief, A/EX/CSM, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-02286 Filed 2-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

22084

Vol. 61, No. 93

Monday, May 13, 1996

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Ch. II

[Docket No. 96-2]

Eligibility for the Cable Compulsory

License

Correction

In proposed rule document 96–11226

beginning on page 20197 in the issue of

Monday, May 6, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 20197, in the second column,

in the DATES section, in the third line,

‘‘June 5, 1996’’ should read ‘‘August 5,

1996’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-37138; File No. SR-Amex96-14]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice

of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by

the American Stock Exchange, Inc.

Relating to the Exchange Board of

Governors

Correction

In notice document 96–10493

beginning on page 18765 in the issue of

Monday, April 29, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 18766, in the third column,

the signature was omitted and should be

inserted before the FR Doc. line as

follows:

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36960; File No. SR-OCC95-20]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The

Options Clearing Corporation; Notice

of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change

Relating to the Issuance, Clearance,

and Settlement of Buy-Write Options

Unitary Derivatives

Correction

In notice document 96–6643

beginning on page 11458 in the issue of

Wednesday, March 20, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 11461, in the third column,

the signature should read ‘‘Margaret H.

McFarland,’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36976; File No. SR-Phlx96-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice

of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by

the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;

To Adopt a Market Index Option Hedge

Exemption

March 14, 1996.

Correction

In notice document 96–6764

beginning on page 11668 in the issue of

Thursday, March 21, 1996, the subject

heading and date should have appeared

as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
**EXHIBIT 31.1 —**CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE IN ANNUAL REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-KI, Cristina M. Lambert, certify that:1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico,Inc. (the “Registrant”);2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4) The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: March 31, 2006/s/Cristina M. Lambert
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Seaside, Oregon, Tsunami Pilot Study— Modernization of FEMA flood hazard maps: GIS data      

      January 1, 2006    

Introduction: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Federal Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) guidelines do not currently exist for conducting and incorporating tsunami hazard assessments that reflect the substantial advances in tsunami research achieved in the last two decades; this conclusion is the result of two FEMA-sponsored workshops and the associated Tsunami Focused Study (Chowdhury and others, 2005). Therefore, as part of FEMA's Map Modernization Program, a Tsunami Pilot Study was carried out in the Seaside/Gearhart, Oregon, area to develop an improved Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (PTHA) methodology and to provide recommendations for improved tsunami hazard assessment guidelines (Tsunami Pilot Study Working Group, 2006). The Seaside area was chosen because it is typical of many coastal communities in the section of the Pacific Coast from Cape Mendocino to the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and because State agencies and local stakeholders expressed considerable interest in mapping the tsunami threat to this area. The study was an interagency effort by FEMA, U.S. Geological Survey, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in collaboration with the University of Southern California, Middle East Technical University, Portland State University, Horning Geoscience, Northwest Hydraulics Consultants, and the Oregon Department of Geological and Mineral Industries. We present the spatial (geographic information system, GIS) data from the pilot study in standard GIS formats and provide files for visualization in Google Earth, a global map viewer.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Florence L Wong

##### Geologist Emeritus

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

fwong@usgs.gov

831-427-4750

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

## Related Content

#### Florence L Wong

##### Geologist Emeritus

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

fwong@usgs.gov

831-427-4750

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: 

 

Otis J. McDuffie, Sr., Case No. 19-16638-SMG 

Debtor. Chapter 11 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 

This matter came before the Court sua sponte. On June 10, 2020, the Court 

conducted a status conference in the Chapter 11 case of Otis J. McDuffie, Sr., a/k/a 

Otis J. McDuffie (the “Debtor”). After hearing from counsel for the Debtor and the 

Office of the United States Trustee, the Court entered an order concluding the status 

conference and setting a Chapter 11 plan deadline of July 31, 2020.1 

This case has been pending since May of 2019. And as of the date of entry of 

this Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed, the Debtor has 

1 ECF No. 64 

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 5, 2020.

Case 19-16638-SMG Doc 71 Filed 08/06/20 Page 1 of 3
2 

not yet filed his Chapter 11 plan. Further, on July 30, 2020, the Lender2 filed its 

Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay.3 The Motion for Relief from the Automatic 

Stay is scheduled to be heard on August 25, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.4 

In light of the Debtor’s failure to file a Chapter 11 plan by July 31, 2020 as 

ordered, the lack of prosecution of this case, and the pending Motion for Relief from 

the Automatic Stay, it appears this Chapter 11 case should be dismissed. It likewise 

appears that good cause exists to shorten the 21 days’ notice required under 

Bankruptcy Rule 2002, for those same reasons. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED: 

1. A hearing to show cause why this chapter 11 case should not be 

dismissed will be held telephonically before the Honorable Scott M. Grossman on 

August 25, 2020, at 1:30 p.m., via CourtSolutions5 (the “Show Cause Hearing”). 

2. The 21 days’ notice period under Bankruptcy Rule 2002 is hereby 

shortened. 

3. Any interested party may be heard at the Show Cause Hearing. 

4. Any objections to dismissal of this case not raised at or before the Show 

Cause Hearing will be waived. 

# # # 

2 Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Successor Trustee to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for 

Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-4 (the “Lender”). 

3 ECF No. 68 

4 ECF No. 69 

5 Appearances for CourtSolutions may be arranged online at www.court-solutions.com/SignUp or by 

telephone at (917) 746-7476.

Case 19-16638-SMG Doc 71 Filed 08/06/20 Page 2 of 3
3 

Copies furnished to: 

All interested parties by the Clerk of Court 

Case 19-16638-SMG Doc 71 Filed 08/06/20 Page 3 of 3