alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2002 of MNS Eagle Equity Group, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.


                                         /s/ Stephen M. Siedow
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Stephen M. Siedow, Chief Executive
                                         Officer and Chief Financial Officer

                                         Date: October 15, 2002
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The
Board of Directors
Digimarc Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-31114, 333-42042, 333-65256, 333-82660, and
333-105097) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-108670 on Form S-3 of Digimarc Corporation of our report dated
February 24, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Digimarc Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual
report on Form 10-K of Digimarc Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Portland,
Oregon
March 15, 2004

---

QuickLinks
Martin P. MARTINEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: May 1983      

      January 1, 1983    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Management opportunities and research priorities for Great Plains grasslands      

      September 27, 2019    

View Document

The Great Plains Grassland Summit: Challenges and Opportunities from North to South was held April 10-11, 2018 in Denver, Colorado. The geographical focus for the summit was the entire Great Plains. The summit was designed to provide syntheses of information about key grassland topics of interest in the Great Plains; networking and learning channels for managers, researchers and stakeholders; and working sessions for sharing input and ideas about challenges and future research and management opportunities. The summit was convened to better understand Great Plains stressors and resource demands and how to manage them, and to discuss methods for improved collaboration among natural resource managers, scientists, and stakeholders. Over 200 stakeholders, who collectively were affiliated with all of the Great Plains states, attended the summit. Attendees included university researchers, government scientists, and individuals affiliated with federal and state agencies, tribes, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Plenary speakers provided syntheses of current knowledge on key topics to help stage working sessions on working lands, native plants and pollinators, native wildlife and biological diversity, invasive species, wildland and prescribed fire, energy development, and weather, water, and climate. The summit steering committee designed one suite of questions that were asked of participants in each working session. This report is a digest of the input from those who attended the seven working sessions and responded to the structured questions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Amy J. Symstad, PhD

##### Chief - Climate and Land-use Branch

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

asymstad@usgs.gov

605-745-1191

## Related Content

#### Amy J. Symstad, PhD

##### Chief - Climate and Land-use Branch

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

asymstad@usgs.gov

605-745-1191

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Great Plains
                  - Colorado
                  -  Illinois
                  -  Iowa
                  -  Kansas
                  -  Minnesota
                  -  Missouri
                  -  Montana
                  -  Nebraska
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  North Dakota
                  -  Ohio
                  -  Oklahoma
                  -  South Dakota
                  -  Texas
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Sysview Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
         30, 2007 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
         all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                                            Date: November 14, 2007
                                            /S/ DARWIN HU
                                            -------------
                                            Darwin Hu, Chairman and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Paleomagnetic constraints on the geometry and timing of deformation at Yucca Mountain, Nevada      

      January 1, 1991    

Paleomagnetic data from Miocene ash flow sheets indicate that southern Yucca Mountain has undergone about 30° of clockwise vertical-axis rotation since emplacement of the Tiva Canyon Member of the Paintbrush Tuff at about 13 Ma. Declinations of remanent magnetization from 32 sites in the reversely magnetized Tiva Canyon Member display a systematic southward increase over the 25 km north–south extent of Yucca Mountain. Probable errors in estimating structural attitudes are a major source of uncertainty in determining the amount of rotation between any two sites. Analysis of tilt-corrected directions of remanent magnetization from the Tiva Canyon sites indicates that structural attitudes determined from outcrop patterns on geologic maps are generally more accurate than field measurements of attitudes of compaction foliation or contacts. Attitudes determined from map patterns apparently minimize effects of (1) initial dips, (2) poorly defined compaction foliation, and (3) tilting that occurred after compaction but before blocking of remanence; however, such attitudes cannot accurately represent tilting related to unmapped local structures. Rotations implied by data from three older ash flow sheets, the Topopah Spring Member of the Paintbrush Tuff (seven sites), and the Prow Pass (four sites) and Bullfrog (three sites) Members of the Crater Flat Tuff are generally consistent with the amount and sense of rotation documented by data from the Tiva Canyon Member. Uncertainties in the declinations of tilt-corrected site mean directions from these older units preclude evaluating whether older units have undergone more rotation than the Tiva Canyon Member.

## Citation Information
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 17, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10258 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. MICHAEL SCOTT TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

No. 1:05-CR-65

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Townsend has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with AndersNo. 06-10258

2 v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Townsend has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s briefdiscloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90215]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 35-26228]


Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as 
Amended (``Act'')

February 3, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-3282 beginning on page 7808 in the issue of 
Thursday, February 9, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 7808, in the third column, in the third paragraph, the 
heading was ``The Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al.'' should read ``The 
Columbia Gas System, Inc., et al. (70-8317)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

s0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

143019

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143019

COA: 295363

Oakland CC: 2009-225262-FC

MICHAEL GREGORY JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
James SHORT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sharon PINDER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4152

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Brice HUGHES

NO. 2018-KK-1002

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 12, 2018

Stay lifted; writ denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant and reverse.

CLARK, J., would grant for the reasons given in Judge Lobrano's well-reasoned dissent below.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Seismic hazard assessment for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands      

      May 4, 2012    

We present the results of a new probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. The Mariana island arc has formed in response to northwestward subduction of the Pacific plate beneath the Philippine Sea plate, and this process controls seismic activity in the region. Historical seismicity, the Mariana megathrust, and two crustal faults on Guam were modeled as seismic sources, and ground motions were estimated by using published relations for a firm-rock site condition. Maps of peak ground acceleration, 0.2-second spectral acceleration for 5 percent critical damping, and 1.0-second spectral acceleration for 5 percent critical damping were computed for exceedance probabilities of 2 percent and 10 percent in 50 years. For 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years, probabilistic peak ground acceleration is 0.94 gravitational acceleration at Guam and 0.57 gravitational acceleration at Saipan, 0.2-second spectral acceleration is 2.86 gravitational acceleration at Guam and 1.75 gravitational acceleration at Saipan, and 1.0-second spectral acceleration is 0.61 gravitational acceleration at Guam and 0.37 gravitational acceleration at Saipan. For 10 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years, probabilistic peak ground acceleration is 0.49 gravitational acceleration at Guam and 0.29 gravitational acceleration at Saipan, 0.2-second spectral acceleration is 1.43 gravitational acceleration at Guam and 0.83 gravitational acceleration at Saipan, and 1.0-second spectral acceleration is 0.30 gravitational acceleration at Guam and 0.18 gravitational acceleration at Saipan. The dominant hazard source at the islands is upper Benioff-zone seismicity (depth 40–160 kilometers). The large probabilistic ground motions reflect the strong concentrations of this activity below the arc, especially near Guam.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Petersen

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

mpetersen@usgs.gov

720-357-4751

## Related Content

#### Mark Petersen

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

mpetersen@usgs.gov

720-357-4751

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Guam;Northern Mariana Islands
                  - Guam
                  - Northern Mariana Islands

View All **
Case 20-13709-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael Schaffer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Schaffer                           /s/ Lawrence Schaffer
--------------------                           ---------------------
By: Michael Schaffer                           By: Lawrence Schaffer
Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer
August 18, 2008                                August 18, 2008
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifying soil carbon loss and uncertainty from a peatland wildfire using multi-temporal LiDAR      

      December 1, 2015    

Peatlands are a major reservoir of global soil carbon, yet account for just 3% of global land cover. Human impacts like draining can hinder the ability of peatlands to sequester carbon and expose their soils to fire under dry conditions. Estimating soil carbon loss from peat fires can be challenging due to uncertainty about pre-fire surface elevations. This study uses multi-temporal LiDAR to obtain pre- and post-fire elevations and estimate soil carbon loss caused by the 2011 Lateral West fire in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, VA, USA. We also determine how LiDAR elevation error affects uncertainty in our carbon loss estimate by randomly perturbing the LiDAR point elevations and recalculating elevation change and carbon loss, iterating this process 1000 times. We calculated a total loss using LiDAR of 1.10 Tg C across the 25 km2 burned area. The fire burned an average of 47 cm deep, equivalent to 44 kg C/m2, a value larger than the 1997 Indonesian peat fires (29 kg C/m2). Carbon loss via the First-Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM) was estimated to be 0.06 Tg C. Propagating the LiDAR elevation error to the carbon loss estimates, we calculated a standard deviation of 0.00009 Tg C, equivalent to 0.008% of total carbon loss. We conclude that LiDAR elevation error is not a significant contributor to uncertainty in soil carbon loss under severe fire conditions with substantial peat consumption. However, uncertainties may be more substantial when soil elevation loss is of a similar or smaller magnitude than the reported LiDAR error.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

#### Zhiliang Zhu, Ph.D.

##### Senior Physical Scientist

Ecosystems Mission Area

zzhu@usgs.gov

703-648-4243

## Related Content

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

#### Zhiliang Zhu, Ph.D.

##### Senior Physical Scientist

Ecosystems Mission Area

zzhu@usgs.gov

703-648-4243

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - great dismal swamp national wildlife refuge
                  - Virginia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Reactions of grizzly bears, Ursus arctos horribilis, to wildfire in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming      

      January 1, 1990    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK) Headquarters          

2327 University WaySuite 2Bozeman, MT59715United States

406-994-7544

406-994-6556

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Yellowstone National Park
                  - Wyoming

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4906 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4906

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of 
employees of a land management agency in a time-limited appointment to 
  compete for a permanent appointment at any Federal agency, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2016

  Mr. Connolly (for himself and Mr. Meadows) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the eligibility of 
employees of a land management agency in a time-limited appointment to 
  compete for a permanent appointment at any Federal agency, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF EMPLOYEES IN A TIME-LIMITED APPOINTMENT TO 
              COMPETE FOR A PERMANENT APPOINTMENT AT ANY FEDERAL 
              AGENCY.

    Section 9602 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``any land management 
        agency or any other agency (as defined in section 101 of title 
        31) under the internal merit promotion procedures of the 
        applicable agency'' and inserting ``such land management agency 
        when such agency is accepting applications from individuals 
        within the agency's workforce under merit promotion procedures, 
        or any agency, including a land management agency, when the 
        agency is accepting applications from individuals outside its 
        own workforce under the merit promotion procedures of the 
        applicable agency''; and
            (2) in subsection (d) by inserting ``of the agency from 
        which the former employee was most recently separated'' after 
        ``deemed a time-limited employee''.
                                 <all>
```
exhibit10_1.htm


 


 










 


Exhibit 10.1











  





  











  








Exhibit 10.1







MDU Resources Group, Inc.


2012 Annual Award Opportunity Chart








	
Name

	
Position

	
2012


Base


Salary


($)

	
Threshold


($)

	
Target


($)

	
Maximum


($)


	
Terry D. Hildestad

	
President and Chief Executive Officer of MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
750,000

	
187,500

	
750,000

	
1,500,000


	
Doran N. Schwartz

	
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
300,000

	
37,500

	
150,000

	
300,000


	
John G. Harp

	
Chief Executive Officer of Construction Materials & Contracting and Construction Services segments

	
495,000

	
160,875

	
643,500

	
1,287,000


	
Steven L. Bietz (1)

	
President and Chief Executive Officer of Pipeline and Energy Services segment

	
360,500

	
58,581

	
234,325

	
468,650


	
David L. Goodin

	
President and Chief Executive Officer of Electric and Natural Gas Distribution (Utility) segments

	
385,000

	
77,000

	
308,000

	
616,000


	
J. Kent Wells

	
President and Chief Executive Officer of Exploration and Production segment

	
550,000

	
171,875

	
687,500

	
1,375,000


	
William E. Schneider

	
Executive Vice President – Bakken Development – of MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
447,400

	
72,703

	
290,810

	
581,620







(1)  Mr. Bietz also has five performance goals relating to the pipeline and energy services segment’s safety results, and each goal that is not met will reduce his annual incentive award payment by 1%.