38772 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

4802) requires that, subject to certain 

exceptions, regulations issued by the 

Federal banking agencies that impose 

additional reporting, disclosure, or other 

requirements on insured depository 

institutions, take effect on the first day 

of the calendar after publication of the 

final rule. This effective date 

requirement does not apply if the 

issuing agency finds for good cause that 

the regulation should become effective 

before such time. 12 U.S.C. 4802. 

The OCC finds there is good cause for 

this final rule to become effective before 

the first day of a calendar quarter. The 

basis for this finding is that the final 

rule does not impose any new reporting 

or disclosure burdens on banks and 

FSAs. While certain banks and FSAs 

will pay a higher assessment, the 

additional assessment does not require 

any changes to systems or procedures. 

For these reasons, the final rule will 

become effective on August 8, 2014. 

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 8 

Assessments, National banks, Savings 

associations, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority and Issuance 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, the OCC amends 12 CFR part 

8 as follows: 

PART 8—ASSESSMENT OF FEES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 8 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 16, 93a, 481, 482, 

1467, 1831c, 1867, 3102, 3108, and 

5412(b)(1)(B); and 15 U.S.C. 78c and 78l. 

■ 2. Section 8.2 is amended by revising 

paragraphs (a) introductory text 

(preceding the table) and (a)(4) to read 

as follows: 

§ 8.2 Semiannual assessment. 

(a) Each national bank and each 

Federal savings association shall pay to 

the Comptroller of the Currency a 

semiannual assessment fee, due by 

March 31 and September 30 of each 

year, for the six-month period beginning 

on January 1 and July 1 before each 

payment date. The Comptroller of the 

Currency will calculate the amount due 

under this section and provide a notice 

of assessments to each national bank 

and each Federal savings association no 

later than 7 business days prior to 

collection on March 31 and September 

30 of each year. In setting assessments, 

the Comptroller of the Currency may 

take into account the nature and scope 

of the activities of a national bank or 

Federal savings association, the amount 

and type of assets that the entity holds, 

the financial and managerial condition 

of the entity, and any other factor the 

Comptroller of the Currency determines 

is appropriate, as provided by 12 U.S.C. 

16. The semiannual assessment will be 

calculated as follows: 

* * * * * 

(4) Each year, the OCC may index the 

marginal rates in Column D to adjust for 

the percent change in the level of prices, 

as measured by changes in the Gross 

Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator 

(GDPIPD) for each June-to-June period. 

The OCC may at its discretion adjust 

marginal rates by amounts other than 

the percentage change in the GDPIPD. 

The OCC will also adjust the amounts 

in Column C to reflect any change made 

to the marginal rate. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. Section 8.8 is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 8.8 Notice of Comptroller of the Currency 

Fees. 

(a) December notice of fees. A ‘‘Notice 

of Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency Fees and Assessments’’ 

(Notice of Fees) shall be published no 

later than the first business day in 

December of each year for fees to be 

charged by the OCC during the 

upcoming year. These fees will be 

effective January 1 of that upcoming 

year. 

(b) Interim and amended notice of 

fees. The OCC may issue a notice of 

‘‘Interim Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency Fees and Assessments’’ or a 

notice of ‘‘Amended Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency Fees and 

Assessments’’ from time to time 

throughout the year as necessary. 

Interim or amended notices will be 

effective 30 days after issuance. 

Dated: July 2, 2014. 

Thomas J. Curry, 

Comptroller of the Currency. 

[FR Doc. 2014–16017 Filed 7–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0859; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AWA–4] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Modification of Class B Airspace; Salt 

Lake City, UT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends the 

description of Area C and Area O of the 

Salt Lake City Class B airspace area by 

raising the floor of a small portion of 

Class B airspace between the Salt Lake 

City Class B surface area and the Hill 

Air Force Base (AFB) Class D airspace 

area. This action raises the Class B 

airspace floor in the northeast corner of 

Area C from 6,000 feet mean seal level 

(MSL) to 7,500 feet MSL, and redefines 

the new boundary segment using the 

power lines underlying the area. This 

action enhances the safety and flow of 

Visual Flight Rules (VFR) aircraft 

transitioning north and south through 

the Salt Lake Valley over Interstate 15. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

October 16, 2014. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On December 19, 2013, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to modify areas C and O of the Salt Lake 

City, UT, Class B airspace area (78 FR 

76781). Interested parties were invited 

to participate in this rulemaking effort 

by submitting written comments on the 

proposal. No comments were received 

in response to the NPRM. 

The Rule 

The FAA is amending Title 14 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

part 71 by modifying the Salt Lake City 

Class B airspace area. This action raises 

the floor of a portion of Class B airspace 

in the northeast corner of Area C from 

6,000 feet MSL to 7,500 feet MSL. The 

portion of Class B airspace raised lies 

northeast of the power lines running 

northwest and southeast under Area C 

and is incorporated into the description 

of Area O, which has a 7,500 foot MSL 

Class B airspace floor. The power lines 

under Area C are used to visually define 

the new shared boundary between Area 

C and Area O in that area. These 

modifications enhance the safety and 

flow of VFR aircraft transitioning north 

and south in the Salt Lake Valley by 

following I–15, while continuing to 

support containment of large turbineVerDate Mar<15>2010 16:31 Jul 08, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM 09JYR1

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 38773 

powered aircraft flying instrument 

procedures within Class B airspace. 

The Salt Lake City Class B airspace 

Areas A, B, and D through N subareas 

are unchanged. The modifications to the 

Salt Lake City Class B airspace Area C 

and Area O subareas are outlined below. 

Area C. Area C includes the airspace 

extending upward from 6,000 feet MSL 

to 12,000 feet MSL. The northeast 

boundary of Area C is defined by a line 

drawn west of and parallel to the power 

lines that run northwest and southeast 

between the Wasatch VHF Omnidirectional Range/Tactical Air 

Navigation (VORTAC) (TCH) 006° radial 

9.5-mile Distance Measuring Equipment 

(DME) at lat. 41°00′28′′ N., long. 

111°57′36′′ W., and the TCH 016° radial 

8.1-mile DME at lat. 40°58′48′′ N., long. 

111°55′58′′ W. The floor of Class B 

airspace located immediately northeast 

of the power lines just described is 

raised from 6,000 feet MSL to 7,500 feet 

MSL and incorporated into the adjacent 

Area O subarea. The remainder of Area 

C is unchanged. 

Area O. Area O includes the airspace 

extending upward from 7,500 feet MSL 

to 12,000 feet MSL. The boundary of the 

area is realigned to match the segment 

of the power lines that run northwest 

and southeast between the TCH 006° 

radial 9.5-mile DME at lat. 41°00′28′′ N., 

long. 111°57′36′′ W., and the TCH 016° 

radial 8.1-mile DME at lat. 40°58′48′′ N., 

long. 111°55′58′′ W. used to define the 

northeast boundary of Area C. The 

portion of Class B airspace incorporated 

into Area O raises the floor of Class B 

airspace in that area from 6,000 feet 

MSL to 7,500 feet MSL. The remainder 

of Area O is unchanged. 

All radials listed in this Salt Lake City 

Class B airspace area modification are 

stated in degrees relative to True North. 

All geographic coordinates are stated in 

degrees, minutes, and seconds based on 

North American Datum 83. 

Implementation of the modification to 

the Salt Lake City Class B airspace area 

continues to ensure containment of 

large turbine-powered aircraft within 

Class B airspace as required by FAA 

directive. Additionally, this action 

allows VFR aircraft to transition east/

west, north of the Salt Lake City Class 

B surface area, and north/south, to and 

from Salt Lake City Airport, using I–15 

as an easily identifiable visual landmark 

outside of Class B airspace below 7,500 

feet MSL. This modification enhances 

the safety and efficient management of 

aircraft operations in the Salt Lake City, 

UT, terminal area. 

Class B airspace areas are published 

in paragraph 3000 of FAA Order 

7400.9X, Airspace Designations and 

Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013, 

and effective September 15, 2013, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class B airspace area listed in 

this document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Evaluation Summary 

Changes to Federal regulations must 

undergo several economic analyses. 

First, Executive Order 12866 and 

Executive Order 13563 direct that each 

Federal agency shall propose or adopt a 

regulation only upon a reasoned 

determination that the benefits of the 

intended regulation justify its costs. 

Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires 

agencies to analyze the economic 

impact of regulatory changes on small 

entities. Third, the Trade Agreements 

Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies 

from setting standards that create 

unnecessary obstacles to the foreign 

commerce of the United States. In 

developing U.S. standards, the Trade 

Act requires agencies to consider 

international standards and, where 

appropriate, that they be the basis of 

U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 

104–4) requires agencies to prepare a 

written assessment of the costs, benefits, 

and other effects of proposed or final 

rules that include a Federal mandate 

likely to result in the expenditure by 

State, local, or tribal governments, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector, of 

$100 million or more annually (adjusted 

for inflation with base year of 1995). 

This portion of the preamble 

summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the 

economic impacts of this proposed rule. 

Department of Transportation Order 

DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and 

procedures for simplification, analysis, 

and review of regulations. If the 

expected cost impact is so minimal that 

a proposed or final rule does not 

warrant a full evaluation, this order 

permits that a statement to that effect 

and the basis for it to be included in the 

preamble if a full regulatory evaluation 

of the cost and benefits is not prepared. 

Such a determination has been made for 

this final rule. The reasoning for this 

determination follows: 

This final rule has the following 

benefits. 

This final rule will improve the flow 

of air traffic, enhance safety, and reduce 

the potential for midair collision in the 

Salt Lake City Class B airspace. 

Implementation of the modification to 

the Salt Lake City Class B airspace area 

will continue to ensure containment of 

large turbine-powered aircraft within 

Class B airspace as required by FAA 

directive. Additionally, this action will 

allow VFR aircraft to transition east/

west, north of the Salt Lake City Class 

B surface area, and north/south, to and 

from Salt Lake City Airport, using I–15 

as an easily identifiable visual landmark 

outside of Class B airspace below 7,500 

feet MSL. This modification will 

enhance the safety and efficient 

management of aircraft operations in the 

Salt Lake City, UT terminal area. 

The FAA stated in the notice of 

proposed rulemaking the FAA belief 

that this final rule will result in minimal 

costs. We received no comments 

regarding this determination and 

therefore accept that this rule will result 

in minimal costs. 

The FAA has, therefore, determined 

that this final rule is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ as defined in section 

3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and is not 

‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures. 

Regulatory Flexibility Determination 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a 

principle of regulatory issuance that 

agencies shall endeavor, consistent with 

the objectives of the rule and of 

applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and 

informational requirements to the scale 

of the businesses, organizations, and 

governmental jurisdictions subject to 

regulation.’’ To achieve this principle, 

agencies are required to solicit and 

consider flexible regulatory proposals 

and to explain the rationale for their 

actions to assure that such proposals are 

given serious consideration.’’ The RFA 

covers a wide-range of small entities, 

including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small 

governmental jurisdictions. 

Agencies must perform a review to 

determine whether a rule will have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. If 

the agency determines that it will, the 

agency must prepare a regulatory 

flexibility analysis as described in the 

RFA. 

However, if an agency determines that 

a rule is not expected to have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, 

section 605(b) of the RFA provides that 

the head of the agency may so certify 

and a regulatory flexibility analysis is 

not required. The certification must 

include a statement providing the 

factual basis for this determination, and 

the reasoning should be clear. 

The FAA believes the rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities as 

the economic impact is expected to be 

minimal. We received no comments 

regarding this determination in the 

notice of proposed rulemaking. As a 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
38774 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 131 / Wednesday, July 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

result we accept our determination of 

minimal cost. 

If an agency determines that a 

rulemaking will not result in a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

head of the agency may so certify under 

section 605(b) of the RFA. Therefore, as 

provided in section 605(b), the head of 

the FAA certifies that this rulemaking 

will not result in a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

International Trade Impact Assessment 

The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 

(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the 

Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. 

L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies 

from establishing standards or engaging 

in related activities that create 

unnecessary obstacles to the foreign 

commerce of the United States. 

Pursuant to these Acts, the 

establishment of standards is not 

considered an unnecessary obstacle to 

the foreign commerce of the United 

States, so long as the standard has a 

legitimate domestic objective, such as 

the protection of safety, and does not 

operate in a manner that excludes 

imports that meet this objective. The 

statute also requires consideration of 

international standards and, where 

appropriate, that they be the basis for 

U.S. standards. 

The FAA has assessed the potential 

effect of this final rule and determined 

that it will enhance safety and will not 

be considered an unnecessary obstacle 

to trade. 

Unfunded Mandates Assessment 

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) 

requires each Federal agency to prepare 

a written statement assessing the effects 

of any Federal mandate in a proposed or 

final agency rule that may result in an 

expenditure of $100 million or more (in 

1995 dollars) in any one year by State, 

local, and tribal governments, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector; such 

a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently 

uses an inflation-adjusted value of $151 

million in lieu of $100 million. 

This final rule does not contain such 

a mandate; therefore, the requirements 

of Title II of the Act do not apply. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p.389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 3000 Subpart B—Class B 

Airspace. 

* * * * * 

ANM UT B Salt Lake City, UT [Amended] 

Salt Lake City International Airport (Primary 

Airport) 

(Lat. 40°47′18′′ N., long. 111°58′40′′ W.) 

Wasatch VORTAC (TCH) 

(Lat. 40°51′01′′ N., long. 111°58′55′′ W.) 

Hill AFB (HIF) 

(Lat. 41°07′26′′ N., long. 111°58′23′′ W.) 

Boundaries. 

By removing the current descriptions of 

Area C and Area O, and adding in its place: 

Area C. That airspace extending upward 

from 6,000 feet MSL to and including 12,000 

feet MSL, within an area bounded by a line 

beginning at the TCH 316° radial 11.6-mile 

DME at lat. 40°59′21′′ N., long. 112°09′33′′ W.; 

thence east to a point west of the power lines 

at the TCH 006° radial 9.5-mile DME at lat. 

41°00′28′′ N., long. 111°57′36′′ W.; thence 

southeast to a point west of the power lines 

at the TCH 016° radial 8.1-mile DME at lat. 

40°58′48′′ N., long. 111°55′58′′ W.; thence 

south to the TCH 020° radial 6.6-mile DME 

at lat. 40°57′13′′ N., long. 111°55′56′′ W.; 

thence west to a point southeast of Seagull 

Point on Antelope Island at the TCH 304° 

radial 9.3-mile DME at lat. 40°56′13′′ N., long. 

112°09′05′′ W.; thence north to the point of 

beginning. 

Area O. That airspace extending upward 

from 7,500 feet MSL to and including 12,000 

feet MSL, within an area bounded by a line 

beginning at the intersection of U.S. Highway 

89 and a 4.3-mile radius from Hill AFB at the 

TCH 014° radial 13.6-mile DME at lat. 

41°04′11′′ N., long. 111°54′39′′ W.; thence 

clockwise along the 4.3-mile radius from Hill 

AFB to 1700 South St. at the TCH 347° radial 

14.7-mile DME at lat. 41°05′20′′ N., long. 

112°03′21′′ W.; thence west along W. 1700 

South St. to the TCH 329° radial 16.8-mile 

DME at lat. 41°05′22′′ N., long. 112°10′20′′ W.; 

thence south to the TCH 316° radial 11.6- 

mile DME at lat. 40°59′21′′ N., long. 

112°09′33′′ W.; thence east to a point west of 

the power lines at the TCH 006° radial 9.5- 

mile DME at lat. 41°00′28′′ N., long. 

111°57′36′′ W.; thence southeast to a point 

west of the power lines at the TCH 016° 

radial 8.1-mile DME at lat. 40°58′48′′ N., long. 

111°55′58′′ W.; thence south to the TCH 020° 

radial 6.6-mile DME at lat. 40°57′13′′ N., long. 

111°55′56′′ W.; thence south to the 

intersection of Redwood Rd. and W. 500 

South St. at the TCH 049° radial 3.1-mile 

DME at lat. 40°53′02′′ N., long. 111°55′48′′ W.; 

thence south to Center St. at the TCH 102° 

radial 2.3-mile DME at lat. 40°50′32′′ N., long. 

111°55′57′′ W.; thence east along Center St. 

to I–15 at the TCH 099° radial 3-mile DME 

at lat. 40°50′32′′ N., long. 111°54′56′′ W.; 

thence north along I–15 to U.S. Highway 89 

at the TCH 024° radial 9-mile DME at lat. 

40°59′14′′ N., long. 111°54′05′′ W.; thence 

north along U.S. Highway 89 to the point of 

beginning. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on July 1, 2014. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations 

Group. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15914 Filed 7–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 73 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0389; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–ASO–6] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Amendment of Time of Designation for 

Restricted Area R–3002G; Fort 

Benning, GA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action amends the time 

of designation for restricted area R– 

3002G at Fort Benning, GA, by removing 

the words ‘‘local time’’ and adding the 

words ‘‘Eastern time’’ to the published 

time of designation. The majority of the 

R–3002 complex (i.e., R–3002A through 

F) lies within the Eastern time zone. 

However, R–3002G is a small segment 

that is in the Central time zone. Since 

the Eastern time zone is predominant 

and is used for scheduling activities in 

the entire complex, the time of 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES