alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$202,536.00	December 30, 2011


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Maker promises
to pay to the order of LANTERN ADVISERS, LLC at such place as the holder of this Note may designate in writing to Maker, the principal
sum of Two Hundred Two Thousand, Five Hundred Thirty-six and No/100 dollars ($202,536.00), together with simple interest on the
unpaid principal balance from the date of this Note paid at the rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum. Principal and interest
are due and payable in lawful money of the United States of America.


 


Principal payments and accrued interest are
due as follows:


 


		·	Interest payments shall be due on the last day of each month;



		·	Principal shall be due on June 30, 2012.



 


This Note serves to consolidate the previous
Note issued and renewed dated September 30, 2011 as well as interest accrued and remaining unpaid as of the date above.


 


This Note may not be fully or partially prepaid at any
time during the term of this Note.


 


If default occurs in the payment of any amount
due under this Note when due, the entire principal balance and accrued but unpaid interest under this Note shall at once become
due and payable, without notice, at the option of the holder of this Note. Any failure to exercise such option shall not constitute
a waiver of the right to exercise it in the event of any subsequent default.


 


Maker waives presentment, dishonor, protest,
demand, diligence, notice of protest, notice of demand, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, and any other notice of any kind
otherwise required by law in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default, enforcement or collection of this
Note and expressly agrees that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be extended or subordinated (by forbearance or otherwise)
at any time, without in any way affecting the liability of Maker. Maker agrees to pay on demand Payee’s reasonable collection
costs to enforce payment due under this Note.


 


This Note may not be amended or modified, nor
shall any waiver of any provision hereof be effective, except only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom
enforcement of any amendment, modification, or waiver is sought. This Note shall be governed by and construed according to the
laws of the State of Minnesota.


 


	 	MAKER:	/s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II
	 	 	Poker Magic, Inc.
	 	 	By:  Joseph A. Geraci, II
	 	 	 
	 	PAYEE: 	/s/ Douglas Polinsky
	 	 	Lantern Advisers, LLC
	 	 	By:  Douglas Polinsky
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0317.02.005.510 Page 1 of 2

Project 

Name:

2015 Annual Review

CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: December 12, 

2014

Time: 4:00 am

pm

Company 

Name:

USS Gary Works, Gary, IN

TRI: 46402SSGRYONENO

ERG Staff Name: Eva Knoth

Contact 

Name:

Courtney Boone (Public TRI Contact)

Tishie Woodwell

Krista Armentrout

Contact Phone 

Number:

412-433-6791

412-519-7353

412-433-5925

General 

Subject:

2013 TRI Water Releases

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I left a message for Ms. Boone on December 12, 4 p.m. Left a second message on December 17, 2 p.m.

Tishie Woodwell left a message for me on December 18, 2014 at 5:30 p.m. I called Ms. Woodwell on 

December 19, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. She asked what specific information we were looking for. I explained that 

ERG wanted to clarify the 2013 TRI data for lead compounds surface water releases and understand how the 

value was calculated. Ms. Woodwell she would pull the information and get back to me later today.

Krista Armentrout from the US Steel Environmental Affairs Office called on December 19 to notify me that the 

2013 lead release was an error and USS Gary Works was working to correct the value through the TRI 

reporting system. She stated that the corrected value would be similar to values in previous reporting years and 

she would email the final correction to me by early next week.

I called Krista on 12/30/14 at 10:30 a.m. to request the updated lead water release estimate. She was currently 

reviewing the methodology for calculating and reporting the facility’s TRI data and expects to have a final 

value available in the following week after manager review.

From: Krista D Armentrout

To: Eva Knoth

CC: Lauren E Legler; Courtney A Boone; Alan R Plewniak; Parker H Adams; Tishie Woodwell; John G 

Leopold

Subject: TRI Inquiry

Date: 1/9/2015 8:34 AM

Ms. Knoth: 

Thanks so much for your recent inquiry concerning the lead compound water discharges reported at Gary 

Works in our 2013 Toxic Release Inventory. During our investigation, it was discovered that an incorrect lead 

concentration was used for one of our process unit outfalls. The previously reported and revised 2013 Lead 

Compounds Form R information is provided below. 
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Previously Reported: 

5. Discharges to receiving streams or water bodies 

5.3.1 Grand Calumet River 

 A. Total Releases: 7,798.91 lbs 

 B. Basis of Estimate: M2 

 C. Percent from Stormwater: 0.17% 

 

Revised Values: 

5. Discharges to receiving streams or water bodies 

5.3.1 Grand Calumet River 

 A. Total Releases: 62.64 lbs 

 B. Basis of Estimate: M2 

 C. Percent from Stormwater: 20.87% 

 

A revised Form R will be submitted to EPA. If any additional information is needed, please contact me. 

Thanks, 

Krista Armentrout

United States Steel Corporation

Technical Services and Practices

Environmental Affairs

Penn Liberty Plaza I

1350 Penn Avenue

Suite 200

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4211

kdarmentrout@uss.com

Office: 412-433-5925

Cell: 412-535-3891

Fax: 412-433-5920
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-90224]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1454 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-054-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model A109S and AW109SP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 14 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This proposed AD is intended to detect a crack, which could lead to a failure of the 

elevator and reduced maneuverability of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $19,921

Labor per Helicopter

(3 x $85/work-hour)

(10 x $85/work-hour)

$255 (per inspection cycle)

$850 (replacement)

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $20,771

Total US Fleet Cost $

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Jim Grigg
Second Amendment to YRC Worldwide Inc. Supplemental Executive Pension Plan



 Exhibit 10.30.3 

SECOND AMENDMENT 
 YRC WORLDWIDE INC. 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE PENSION PLAN 

(Effective January 1, 2005) 
 WHEREAS, YRC Worldwide Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the YRC Worldwide Inc. Supplemental Executive Pension Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of the employees of
the Company and its participating affiliates; 
 WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Plan provides that the Company, through
action of its Board of Directors or its delegated representative, may amend the Plan at any time; 
 WHEREAS, the Company
has determined to amend the Plan to clarify the provisions regarding involuntary lump sum cashouts; 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT effective July 1, 2008, Section 3.4(e) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 
 (e) Lump Sum Payment of Small Amounts. Subject to Section 3.5(b), notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, each Participant who incurs a Separation from Service (for
any reason) and whose vested benefit at such time has a Present Value of less than or equal to the applicable dollar amount under section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code for the year of the Separation from Service, shall be paid in the form of a lump sum
payment in cash as soon as is administratively practicable following the Participant’s Separation from Service. A surviving Spouse or other Beneficiary of a Participant whose vested benefit has a Present Value of less than or equal to the
applicable dollar amount under section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code for the year of the Participant’s death shall be paid in the form of a lump sum payment in cash. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be effective the 1st day of July 2008. 

 

			
	YRC WORLDWIDE INC.
		
	By 	 	 
		 	 Harold D. Marshall
 Vice
President – Employee Benefits
Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/06/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/06/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 7 Filed 03/06/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Simulation of streamflow in the Pleasant, Narraguagus, Sheepscot, and Royal Rivers, Maine, using watershed models      

      March 10, 2011    

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) began a study in 2008 to investigate anticipated changes in summer streamflows and stream temperatures in four coastal Maine river basins and the potential effects of those changes on populations of endangered Atlantic salmon. To achieve this purpose, it was necessary to characterize the quantity and timing of streamflow in these rivers by developing and evaluating a distributed-parameter watershed model for a part of each river basin by using the USGS Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS). The GIS (geographic information system) Weasel, a USGS software application, was used to delineate the four study basins and their many subbasins, and to derive parameters for their geographic features. The models were calibrated using a four-step optimization procedure in which model output was evaluated against four datasets for calibrating solar radiation, potential evapotranspiration, annual and seasonal water balances, and daily streamflows. The calibration procedure involved thousands of model runs that used the USGS software application Luca (Let us calibrate). Luca uses the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE) global search algorithm to calibrate the model parameters. The calibrated watershed models performed satisfactorily, in that Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) statistic values for the calibration periods ranged from 0.59 to 0.75 (on a scale of negative infinity to 1) and NSE statistic values for the evaluation periods ranged from 0.55 to 0.73. The calibrated watershed models simulate daily streamflow at many locations in each study basin. These models enable natural resources managers to characterize the timing and amount of streamflow in order to support a variety of water-resources efforts including water-quality calculations, assessments of water use, modeling of population dynamics and migration of Atlantic salmon, modeling and assessment of habitat, and simulation of anticipated changes to streamflow and water temperature resulting from changes forecast for air temperature and precipitation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Robert Dudley

##### Supervisory Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

rwdudley@usgs.gov

207-626-6615

#### Martha G Nielsen

##### Hydrologist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

mnielsen@usgs.gov

608-821-3913

## Related Content

#### Robert Dudley

##### Supervisory Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

rwdudley@usgs.gov

207-626-6615

#### Martha G Nielsen

##### Hydrologist

Upper Midwest Water Science Center

mnielsen@usgs.gov

608-821-3913

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - Surface Water Modeling
                  - Watershed Hydrology
                  - Surface Water
                  - Water
                  -  New England

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Landsat data ecosystem case study: Actor perceptions of the use and value of landsat      

      February 4, 2022    

It is well-known that Earth observation (EO) data plays a critical role in scientific understanding about the global environment. There is also growing support for the use of EO data to provide context-specific insights, with significant implications for their use in decision support systems. Technological development over recent years, including cloud computing infrastructure, machine learning techniques, and rapid expansion of the velocity, volume, and variety of space-borne data sources, offer huge potential to provide solutions to the myriad environmental problems facing society and the planet. The USGS/NASA Landsat Program, the longest continuously gathered source of land surface data, has played a central role in our understanding of environmental change, particularly for its contribution of longitudinal products that offer greater context for present research and decision support activities. The challenge facing the Landsat and EO data community, however, now lies in moving beyond context-specific knowledge generation to translating such knowledge into tangible value for society. Drawing from an open data ecosystem framework and qualitative social science methods, we map the Landsat data ecosystem (LDE) and the relationships linking multiple actors responsible for processing, indexing, analyzing, synthesizing, and translating raw Landsat data into information that is useful, useable, and used by end users in particular social-environmental contexts. Both the role of Big Data and associated technologies are discussed as they relate to the ultimate use of Landsat-derived information products to guide decision-making, and key data ecosystem characteristics that shape the likelihood of these products’ use are highlighted.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Crista L Straub, PhD

##### Social Scientist

National Land Imaging Program

cstraub@usgs.gov

970-226-9143

## Related Content

#### Crista L Straub, PhD

##### Social Scientist

National Land Imaging Program

cstraub@usgs.gov

970-226-9143

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230
{2332/000/00496200} 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

In re: 

Advanced Power Technologies, LLC, Case No. 20-13304-PGH 

 

 Debtor. Chapter 11 

________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS CASE 

AND SHORTEN HEARING NOTICE PERIOD 

THIS MATTER came before for hearing on April 24, 2020, upon the Emergency Motion 

to Voluntarily Dismiss Case and Shorten Hearing Notice Period (the "Motion") filed by Advance 

Power Technologies, LLC (the "Debtor"). ECF No. 51. The Court having reviewed the Motion 

and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, and for the reasons stated on the record, which 

are incorporated by reference, it is 

Paul G. Hyman, Jr.,Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 24, 2020.

Case 20-13304-PGH Doc 60 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 3
 {2332/000/00496200} 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9006(c), the notice period for 

hearing on the Motion is SHORTENED. 

2. The Motion is GRANTED as follows. 

3. This bankruptcy case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

4. The Debtor forthwith shall pay all statutory fees owing to the Office of the United 

States Trustee for the first calendar quarter of 2020. 

5. The Debtor shall timely file its monthly operating report for the month of April 

2020, and timely pay all statutory fees owing to the Office of the United States Trustee for such 

month. 

6. The entry of this Order shall neither negate nor adversely affect any of those rights 

and interests given to TBK Bank, SSB ("TBK"), under and in respect to the Court’s Final 

Financing Order and the Post-Petition Agreements [ECF No. 45]; including, but not limited to, all 

senior and first priority post-petition liens and security interests granted to TBK, and the Debtor’s 

prepetition and post-petition monetary and non-monetary obligations to TBK shall remain in full 

force and effect post-dismissal. In accordance herewith, TBK shall be entitled to continue 

collecting directly from any account debtors all payments made on any accounts. 

7. All pending motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 

Case 20-13304-PGH Doc 60 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 3
 {2332/000/00496200} 3

8. The Court reserves jurisdiction to interpret and enforce this Order, including those 

provisions of the Order directing the Debtor to file monthly operating reports and pay statutory 

fees owing to the Office of the United States Trustee. 

### 

SUBMITTED BY: 

Bradley Shraiberg, Esq. 

SHRAIBERG, LANDAU & PAGE, P.A. 

Attorneys for the Debtor 

2385 NW Executive Center Drive, No. 300 

Boca Raton, Florida 33431 

Tel.: 561-443-0800 

Facsimile: 561-998-0047 

Email: bss@slp.law 

Bradley Shraiberg, Esq. is directed to serve copies of this Order upon all interested parties and to 

file a certificate of service with the Court. 

Case 20-13304-PGH Doc 60 Filed 04/24/20 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10524]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2004340EN.01002101.xml

| 16.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 340/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 340/21

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 October 2004

approving the conclusion by the Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part

(2004/755/Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 101, second paragraph thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

Pending the entry into force of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, signed in Luxembourg on 11 October 2004, an Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, should be concluded by the Commission on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

1.   The conclusion by the Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, together with the Annexes and Protocol attached thereto and the Declarations made by the Community unilaterally or jointly with the other Party is hereby approved.

2.   The text of the Agreement, Annexes and Protocol and Final Act is attached to this Decision (1).

Done at Luxembourg, 11 October 2004

For the Council

The President

B. R. BOT

---

(1)  See p. 2 of this Official Journal.

1

---












Case 20-14043-EPK Doc 60 Filed 11/08/21 Page 1 of 3


















Case 20-14043-EPK Doc 60 Filed 11/08/21 Page 2 of 3










Case 20-14043-EPK Doc 60 Filed 11/08/21 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             806,586
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       50,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,842,546
<PP&E>                                             502,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                      41,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,263,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              681,112
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               148
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,922,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,263,339
<SALES>                                          1,042,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,042,033
<CGS>                                            8,132,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,132,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,826,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,894,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,663,658)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,663,658)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,663,658)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.18)



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. for
the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned officers of OpenTV Corp.
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge: (1) the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
OpenTV Corp. Date: November 9, 2004
    /s/ James A. ChiddixJames A. ChiddixChief Executive OfficerDate: November 9, 2004
    /s/ Richard HornsteinRichard HornsteinChief Financial Officer 43
Louis D. VELEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.