alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Post-fire redistribution of soil carbon and nitrogen at a grassland-shrubland ecotone      

      May 31, 2018    

The rapid conversion of grasslands into shrublands has been observed in many arid and semiarid regions worldwide. Studies have shown that fire can provide certain forms of reversibility for shrub-grass transition due to resource homogenization and shrub mortality, especially in the early stages of shrub encroachment. Field-level post-fire soil resource redistribution has rarely been tested. Here we used prescribed fire in a shrubland-grassland transition zone in the northern Chihuahuan Desert to test the hypothesis that fire facilitates the remobilization of nutrient-enriched soil from shrub microsites to grass and bare microsites and thereby reduces the spatial heterogeneity of soil resources. Results show that the shrub microsites had the lowest water content compared to grass and bare microsites after fire, even when rain events occurred. Significant differences of total soil carbon (TC) and total soil nitrogen (TN) among the three microsites disappeared one year after the fire. The spatial autocorrelation distance increased from 1~2 m, approximately the mean size of an individual shrub canopy, to over 5 m one year after the fire for TC and TN. Patches of high soil C and N decomposed one year after the prescribed fire. Overall, fire stimulates the transfer of soil C and N from shrub microsites to nutrient-depleted grass and bare microsites. Such a redistribution of soil C and N, coupled with the reduced soil water content under the shrub canopies, suggests that fire might influence the competition between shrubs and grasses, leading to a higher grass, compared to shrub, coverage in this ecotone.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - Mexico
                  -  United States
                  - chihuahuan desert
                  - Arizona
                  -  Chihuahua
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Texas

View All **
cum in WR-48,152-08 hlLtU IN COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/1/2016 12:21:15 PM June 1, 2016 Accepted 6/1/2016 12:33:29 PM 

## No. WR-48,152-08 ABELACLERK ABELACOSTA, CLERK**♦-** 3htthe 

### Court of Criminal appeals &t Austin

Ex Parte GARCIA GLEN WHITE Applicant 

### On Application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus 

### Fromthe 180thDistrictCourtofHarris County, Texas No. 723847

APPLICANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION IN TIME IN WHICH TO CORRECTDEFICIENCIES IN MAY 24, 2016 RESPONSE

To the Honorable Justices of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas: 

### Comes now, the Applicant, Garcia Glen White, by and through his attorneys of record, Patrick F. McCann and Mandy Miller, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to extend the time for filing his Response to this Court's Order of 

### March 23, 2016, up to and including June 1, 2016. In support ofsuch motion, the Applicant would show the Courtthe following: 

### (1) After receiving one extension in time up to and including May 24, 2016, in which to file a Response worthy ofthis Court's attention, the Applicant timely filed his Response on May 24, 2016. 1 | P a g e(2) The undersigned counsel were advised telephonically by the Clerk of this Court on June 1, 2016, that the Applicant's Response was deficient and had been rejected for filing because ofthe unintended omission ofthe Certificate of Compliance with respect to the word count ofthe Response. 

### (3) The undersigned have corrected this deficiency and, contemporaneously with the filing ofthis motion for extension in time, have re submitted the corrected Response. 

### (4) The undersigned apologize to both the Court and its Clerk for any inconvenience this omission may have caused, and make assurances that steps have been taken to ensure that this does not happen again.
PRAYER 

### Wherefore, premises considered, the Applicant prays that this Honorable Court will, in all things, GRANT this motion, and permit the filing of the 

### Applicant's corrected Response to this Court's March 23, 2016 Order, and that the Court further GRANT any additional reliefto which the Applicant may be legally andjustly entitled. 

### DATED this 1STday ofJune, 2016.

2 | P a g eRespectfully submitted, 

# ^^^?0€^f4 WS* PatrickMcCann State Bar No: 00792680 

### writlawyer(g)justice.com

Mandy Miller State Bar No: 24055561 

### mandy@mandymillerlegal.com 909 Texas Ave., Ste. 205 Houston, TX 77002 (713)223-3805 Fax (713) 226-8097 Attorneysfor the Applicant Garcia Glen White

3 | P a g eCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Applicant has sent a copy of the foregoing instrument to counsel for the 

### State ofTexas at the following electronic mail addresses onthis 1st day ofJune,
2016: Lynn Hardaway Harris CountyAssistant DistrictAttorney 

### hardaway_lynn@dao.hctx.net Lori DeAngelo Harris CountyAssistant DistrictAttorney 

### deangelo_lori@dao.hctx.net



### I

Patrick McCann 

# IXn*J~uLi

Mandy Miller Attorneys for the Applicant Garcia Glen White

4 | P a g e
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Quality of surface water in the Bear River basin, Utah, Wyoming and Idaho      

      January 1, 1970    

Water-quality data have been collected intermittently at several sites in the Bear River basin since 1947. Because the Bear River flows through three States - Utah, Wyoming, and Idaho - water-quality programs have been confined for the most part within State boundaries. In 1967, the U.S. Geological Survey, as a part of its cooperative program with the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights, designed a reconnaissance to obtain needed water-quality information for the entire basin. This report presents the results of the data-collection phase of the reconnaissance. Also included in this report are data collected intermittently or periodically prior to the reconnaissance by the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration. An interpretive report is being prepared and will be published by the U.S. Geological Survey as a Hydrologic Atlas.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Bear River Basin
                  - Idaho
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 40637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30809]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35999; File No. SR-Phlx-95-41]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change by Philadelphia 
Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Reducing the Value of the 
Semiconductor Index

July 20, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-18340 beginning on page 38387 in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 26, 1995, in the first column, the date line was 
omitted and should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Evolve One, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Irwin Horowitz, CEO of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                          /s/ Irwin Horowitz
                          ------------------
                          Irwin Horowitz, CEO and President, principal executive
                          officer and principal financial and accounting officer

March 30, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
William D. ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1499

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 7, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.
Shermykael JENKINS, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Deandra Leeann GOODMAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 06, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000405

04-AUG-2014

09:05 AM
Joinder Agreement dated March 13, 2008 between the Company and Mr. Wren



 Exhibit 10.1 
 NEUTRAL TANDEM, INC. 
 JOINDER
AGREEMENT 
 This JOINDER AGREEMENT (the “Joinder Agreement”), dated as of March 13, 2008, is entered into by and
between Neutral Tandem, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Rian J. Wren (the “Stockholder”). 
 WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors of the Company previously approved the issuance to the Stockholder of options that if exercised will result in the issuance of common stock (the “Common Stock”), par value $0.001 per share, of the Company;

 WHEREAS, the Company and Stockholder desire that Stockholder become a party to the Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the
“Registration Rights Agreement”), dated as of February 2, 2006, by and among the Company and the parties thereto, as a Stockholder (as defined therein), and in furtherance of the foregoing, the Company and the Stockholder shall
execute and deliver this Joinder Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Joinder Agreement hereby agree as follows: 
 Agreement to be Bound. The Stockholder hereby agrees that, upon execution of this Joinder Agreement, the Stockholder shall become a party to the Registration Rights Agreement, as a Stockholder (as defined therein), and shall be fully
bound by, subject to, and have the benefit of all of the covenants, terms and conditions of the Registration Rights Agreement as though a Stockholder thereunder. 
 Successors and Assigns. This Joinder Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Stockholder and the Company, and their respective successors, heirs and assigns. 
 Counterparts. This Joinder Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together
shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
 Notices. All notices, demands or other communications to the Stockholder shall be
directed to the address set forth next to the Stockholder’s name on the signature page hereto. 
 Governing Law. This Joinder
Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law (other than the law governing conflict of law questions) of the State of Delaware. 
 Descriptive Headings. The descriptive headings of this Joinder Agreement are for convenience of reference only and do not constitute a part of this Joinder Agreement. 
 [remainder of page intentionally left blank] 









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Joinder Agreement as of the date first above
written. 
  

			
	 NEUTRAL TANDEM, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	  

	 Name:
	 	  

	 Title:
	 	  

	
	 STOCKHOLDER:

	
	  
 Rian J. Wren
1 The defen dan t testified he receiv ed co nsecu tive sente ncing in the gen eral ses sions c ourt; ho weve r, t h e

judg men ts of th at court are sil ent as to concurrent/ consecutive sentenci ng for the two count s. That i ssue i s moot in view of the de novo app eal to c ircuit co urt. 

### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE Assigned on

Briefs A ugust 14, 2002 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES RA Y BARTLETT

Circuit Court for Lincoln County

No. S0100037

No. M2001-02419-CCA-R3-CD - F iled September 20, 2002

ORDER Defendant

appeals the circuit court

judgmen ts denying

him probation on two misdemeanor counts of passing worthless checks. We affirm pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals

. On June 18, 2001, t

he defe ndant ple d guilty

in Lin coln County Genera

l Sessions Court to two misdemeanor

charges of passing wor

thless checks. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-121. Thegeneral ses sions judge sentenced him to sentences of eleve n months and twenty-nine days, with al l suspendedexcept fo

r nine mon

ths inthe count

y ja il. 1 The defendant appealed his sentence s to the circui t court, which conducted a sentencing he aring. The circuit court sentenced him to two concurrent

sentences of eleven months an d t we nt y-n in e d ays to be ser ved in the county jail. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by denying probation. The proof from

the sentencing hearing reflects the defe ndant has an extensive prior criminal record which includes misdemeanor conviction s and numerous felony c onvictions, such as grand la rc en y, ag gr av at ed bu rg la ry, multiple burglaries, aggra vated assault, and multiple felony thefts. He committed some of these offenses while he was on probation and/or pa role. In determini ng whether to grant or deny probation, a trial court should consider the circumstances of the offense, the defendant' s criminal record, the defendant’s soci al his tory and present condition, the need for deterrence, a nd the best interest of the defendant and the public. State v. Grear , 568 S.W.2d 285, 286 (Tenn. 1 978); St at e v . B oyd , 925 S.W.2d 237, 244 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). The trial court

may also consider

whether measures less restrictive than confine ment have been unsuccessful. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-103(1)(C). Given the proof pre sented to the trial court regarding the defe

ndant’s extensive prior criminal hi st or y a nd the crimes he has committed-2-

while on probation and/or parole, we cannot conclude the trial court abused its discretion in deny ing probatio n to the defendant

. Ac co rd in gl y, it is ORDERE D that the

judgmen t of the tr ial cour t be aff irmed pur suant to Ru le 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Costs are taxed to the state since the defendant is indigent.

JOE G. RILE Y, JUDGE

DAVID G. HAYES , JUDGE

NORMA MCGEE OGL E, JUDGE
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Occupancy and abundance of the endangered yellowcheek darter in Arkansas      

      July 15, 2015    

The Yellowcheek Darter (Etheostoma moorei) is a rare fish endemic to the Little Red River watershed in the Boston Mountains of northern Arkansas. Remaining populations of this species are geographically isolated and declining, and the species was listed in 2011 as federally endangered. Populations have declined, in part, due to intense seasonal stream drying and inundation of lower reaches by a reservoir. We used a kick seine sampling approach to examine distribution and abundance of Yellowcheek Darter populations in the Middle Fork and South Fork Little Red River. We used presence data to estimate occupancy rates and detection probability and examined relationships between Yellowcheek Darter density and environmental variables. The species was found at five Middle Fork and South Fork sites where it had previously been present in 2003–2004. Occupancy rates were >0.6 but with wide 95% CI, and where the darters occurred, densities were typical of other Ozark darters but highly variable. Detection probability and density were positively related to current velocity. Given that stream drying has become more extreme over the past 30 years and anthropogenic threats have increased, regular monitoring and active management may be required to reduce extinction risk of Yellowcheek Darter populations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Dan Magoulick, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

danmag@usgs.gov

479-575-5449

## Related Content

#### Dan Magoulick, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

danmag@usgs.gov

479-575-5449

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Middle Fork and South Fork Little Red River
                  - Arkansas

View All **
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J.
Terry Medovitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
August 14,
2008                                                                         /s/ J. Terry
Medovitch


J. Terry
Medovitch


President and Chief Financial
Officer
The GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Michelle TURCOTTE, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5652

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

55188

Vol. 61, No. 207

Thursday, October 24, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Consumer Service

7 CFR Parts 271, 272, and 273

[Amendment No. 375]

RIN 0584–AB76

Food Stamp Program: Certification

Provisions of the Mickey Leland

Childhood Hunger Relief Act

Correction

In rule document 96–26072,

beginning on page 54270, in the issue of

Thursday, October 17, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 54279, in the first column, at

the end of the first full paragraph, ‘‘June

30, 1997’’ should read ‘‘March 1, 1997’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Special Education and

Rehabilitative Services; Proposed

Priorities

Correction

In notice document 96–25944

beginning on page 53032 in the issue of

Wednesday, October 9, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 53032, in the first column, in

the DATES section, in the fourth line

insert ‘‘November 8, 1996’’ after the

semicolon.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 208

[Docket No. FR-2958-F-05]

RIN 2502-AF32

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Housing-Federal Housing

Commissioner; Home Equity

Conversion Mortgage Insurance

Demonstration; Additional

Streamlining

Correction

In rule document 96–23717 beginning

on page 49030 in the issue of Tuesday,

September 17, 1996, make the following

corrections:

§ 206.45 [Corrected]

1. On page 49033, in the third

column, in amendatory instruction 14,

in the first line ‘‘§ 206.47’’ should read

‘‘§ 206.45.’’

2. On the same page, in the same

column, the section heading should

read ‘‘§ 206.45 Eligible properties.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

UNITED STATES INFORMATION

AGENCY

Exchanges and Training Program With

Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan

Correction

In notice document 96–26378

appearing on page 54261 in the issue of

Thursday, October 17, 1996, make the

following correction:

On page 54261, in the second column,

in the ninth line from the bottom,

‘‘twenty-five’’ should read ‘‘twenty’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

51751

Vol. 61, No. 193

Thursday, October 3, 1996

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[OPPT-59355; FRL 5396-7]

Certain Chemicals; Approval of a Test

Marketing Exemption

Correction

In notice document 96–24601

beginning on page 50297 in the issue of

Wednesday, September 25, 1996, make

the following correction:

On page 50298, in the first column,

under TME-96-9, in the first paragraph,

lines three and four reading ‘‘(insert

date 15 days after date of publication in

the Federal Register)’’ should read

‘‘October 10, 1996’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and

Families

45 CFR Part 1386

RIN 0970–AB11

Developmental Disabilities Program

Correction

In rule document 96–24508 beginning

on page 51142, in the issue of Monday,

September 30, 1996, make the following

correction:

§ 1386.30 [Corrected]

On page 51159, in the third column,

amendatory instruction number 23 to

§ 1386.30 should read as set forth below:

‘‘23. Section 1386.30 is amended by

revising paragraphs (a) and (c)(1);

redesignating paragraph (e) as (f);

republishing newly redesignated

paragraph (f), introductory text; revising

the newly redesignated paragraphs

(f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4); and adding new

paragraphs (c)(3) and (e) to read as

follows:’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

1996-97 Allocation of the Tariff-rate

Quotas for Raw and Refined Sugar

Correction

In notice document 96–25011

appearing on page 51135 in the issue of

Monday, September 30, 1996, make the

following correction:

In the third column, under Refined

Sugar Allocation, in the first paragraph,

in the seventh line from the bottom,

‘‘25,00’’ shoulld read ‘‘25,000’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D