alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- 

### 2011-0385 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2010-NM-256 -AD

If you make changes to th e values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work-hours

(include

access, testing,

and close-up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### 17.0 $1,445 .0

0 

### $0 $1,445.00 

### 46 $66,470.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $66,470



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA -IR-M-8040.1C. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link



### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a s ubstantial number of small entities? Explain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 128    Filed 05/07/21    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 128    Filed 05/07/21    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 128    Filed 05/07/21    Page 3 of 3
09/17/201 0 1G;52 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS 1001/00 1 

Case No. 2010NM730003 

DEPARTMENT OF 

•^ANSPORWiON 

C'ET OPERATIONS 

8-23-10 

If: ''4: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention; Hearing IX^ciceiClerk, 

AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building Room 2W1000 

^P 70 A q: 03 

t9\M^b ^ I20/0'0193 

Vo Glenn H. Brown and whomever else it may concern. 

Upon receiving your Kinal Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty on 7-26-10 in the amoiinl ol" 

$3500.00,1 contacted you on 7-30-10 and discussed the reason for the delay of response 

and lack of response to the informal conference, due to the lack of my attorney's help 

dealing with this issue. I asked you to send me the email you had sent to my attorney, 

which caused a further delay because he never forwarded the email to me. You 

forwarded the email to me on 7-30-10, and I followed the instructions you had listed in 

the email. 1 called you on 8-06-10 and informed you I had completed the ta.sks li.sted in 

your email, and 1 followed your instructions by emailing you a list of ihc names and 

telephone numbers of 10 individual.^ T had educated with the publications you had nie 

download- You told me you wuuld call mc next week and discuss the options as you 

were not in a position to discuss the matter ai that lime. As of 8-23-10,1 have not yet 

heard back from you. 

Now it is beyond the 15 day period to respond to the letter. T am sending this response 

requesting a proposed penally amount of $500.00 in an effort to resolve this matter. If 

my proposed amount is not acceptable, 1 would like to request a hearing, since we were 

unable to come to some sort of an agreement with the proposed civil penalty dollar 

amount. 

Bradly D. Wheeler 

115 Lillian Dr. 

Silka, AK 99835 

CC: Glenn H.Brown 

222 W. 7"'Ave. #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 0'-;5 ... a '^f
BIG CAT MINING CORPORATION
                              A Nevada Corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Timothy Barritt, President and Chief Executive Officer and
Richard G. Stockdale, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Big Cat Mining Corporation for the
     period ended April 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big Cat
     Mining Corporation.




Dated February 16, 2006                  /s/ Timothy Barritt
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Timothy Barritt,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated February 16, 2006                  /s/ Richard G. Stockdale
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Richard G. Stockdale,
                                         Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Optimization of decision rules for hydroelectric operation to reduce both eel mortality and unnecessary turbine shutdown: A search for a win-win solution      

      July 20, 2017    

Worldwide populations of freshwater eels have declined with one of the contributing causes related to mortality during passage through hydropower turbines. An inherent trade‐off underlies turbine management where the competing demand for more hydropower comes at the expense of eel survival. A win–win solution exists when an option performs better on all competing demands compared to other options. A predictive model for eel migration based on a recent telemetry study was used to develop decision rules for turbine management in the Shenandoah River system. The performance of alternative decision rules was compared to the status quo policy to search for win–win solutions. Decision rules were defined by the probability of eel movement and were evaluated by the probabilities of false positive and false negative errors. The exact value of the cut‐off probability used in the decision rule will need to be determined through negotiation between stakeholders, but a range of cut‐off probabilities resulted in a win–win situation with both reduced eel mortality and increased turbine operation relative to the current shutdown strategy. Monitoring the implementation is needed to evaluate and update the predictive model and to refine the decision rule. Although the decision is framed for the Shenandoah River system, the analytical approach could be used to develop decision rules for turbine shutdown policy in other areas.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David R Smith, Ph.D.

##### Research Statistician (Biology)

Eastern Ecological Science Center

drsmith@usgs.gov

304-724-4467

#### Stuart Welsh, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

swelsh@usgs.gov

304-293-5006

## Related Content

#### David R Smith, Ph.D.

##### Research Statistician (Biology)

Eastern Ecological Science Center

drsmith@usgs.gov

304-724-4467

#### Stuart Welsh, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

swelsh@usgs.gov

304-293-5006

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Shenandoah watershed
                  - Virginia
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary interpretation of seasonal movement of the Slumgullion landslide as determined from GPS observations, July 1998-July 1999      

      January 1, 2000    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Slumgullion landslide
                  - Colorado

View All **
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Forms S-3 (Registration  Nos.  333-120146,  333-134147 and 333-142403) and Forms
S-8 (Registration  Nos.  333-115649 and 333-123184) of our report dated February
17, 2006,  included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NATIONAL COAL CORP. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.



                                         /S/ GORDON, HUGHES & BANKS, LLP
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         GORDON, HUGHES & BANKS, LLP

Greenwood Village, Colorado
April 14, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the TiVo Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anna Brunelle, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2010



/s/ ANNA BRUNELLEAnna BrunelleChief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 30, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-60730]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AGL-5]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Strugis, SD

Correction

    In document rule 96-17591, beginning on page 36285, in the issue of 
Wednesday, July 10,1996, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 36285, in the third column, the Airspace Docket No. 
should read as cited above.
    2. On page 36286, in the second column, in the AGL SD E5 Sturgis, 
SD [New] entry, in the second line, ``lat. 44 deg.26'06'' N,'' should 
read ``lat. 44 deg.25'06'' N,''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mw 4.2 Delaware Earthquake of 30 November 2017      

      September 19, 2018    

The 30 November 2017 Delaware earthquake with magnitude MW 4.2 occurred beneath the northeastern tip of the Delmarva Peninsula near Dover, Delaware. The earthquake and its aftershocks provide an opportunity to evaluate seismicity in a passive margin setting using much improved coverage by high-quality permanent broadband seismometers at regional distance ranges in the central and eastern United States. This is the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in Delaware and triggered a collaborative rapid-response effort by seismologists at five institutions along the mid-Atlantic. As a result of this effort, eighteen portable seismographs were deployed in the epicentral region within 24 hours of the mainshock.  High-quality seismic recordings at over 380 permanent regional broadband seismographic stations in the eastern United States show a remarkably small decrease in amplitude with distance between 800-2000 km.  The mainshock focal mechanism shows predominantly strike-slip motion with a significant thrust component.  The orientation of the subhorizontal P-axis is consistent with that of earthquakes in the nearby Reading-Lancaster seismic zone in Pennsylvania, but are rotated counter-clockwise about 45o from that of the MW 5.8 Mineral, Virginia earthquake. We detected small aftershocks below the normal event detection threshold by using a waveform cross-correlation detection method.  This demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach for earthquake studies and hazard evaluation in the eastern United States. Based on their waveform similarities, repeating earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 1.5 are detected in 2010, 2015, and 2017. While there is a large time interval between events, 5 years and 2.2 years respectively, the events occur within a spatially tight cluster located near the 2017 Dover DE earthquake mainshock.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Thomas Pratt, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geologic Hazards Science Center

tpratt@usgs.gov

720-357-0470

## Related Content

#### Thomas Pratt, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geologic Hazards Science Center

tpratt@usgs.gov

720-357-0470

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Delaware

View All **
Case 19-20438-PGH    Doc 95    Filed 05/30/23    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-20438-PGH    Doc 95    Filed 05/30/23    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-20438-PGH    Doc 95    Filed 05/30/23    Page 3 of 3
Marina R. BALDOVINO, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1654

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is granted. Dismissed.

Motion is granted. Remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 146 (Monday, July 29, 1996)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-30729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

[Docket No. 301-62]


Termination of Increased Duties on Certain Products of the 
European Community

Correction

    In notice document 96-18122, appearing on page 37309, in the issue 
of Wednesday, July 17, 1996, make the following correction.
    On page 37309, in the third column, in the last paragraph, in the 
first line, ``not'' should read ``now''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Population models of burrowing mayfly recolonization in western Lake Erie      

      November 1, 1998    

Burrowing mayflies, Hexagenia spp. (H. limbata and H. rigida), began recolonizing western Lake Erie during the 1990s. Survey data for mayfly nymph densities indicated that the population experienced exponential growth between 1991 and 1997. To predict the time to full recovery of the mayfly population, we fitted logistic models, ranging in carrying capacity from 600 to 2000 nymphs/m2, to these survey data. Based on the fitted logistic curves, we forecast that the mayfly population in western Lake Erie would achieve full recovery between years 1998 and 2000, depending on the carrying capacity of the western basin. Additionally, we estimated the mortality rate of nymphs in western Lake Erie during 1994 and then applied an age-based matrix model to the mayfly population. The results of the matrix population modeling corroborated the exponential growth model application in that both methods yielded an estimate of the population growth rate, r, in excess of 0.8 yr−1. This was the first evidence that mayfly populations are capable of recolonizing large aquatic ecosystems at rates comparable with those observed in much smaller lentic ecosystems. Our model predictions should prove valuable to managers of power plant facilities along the western basin in planning for mayfly emergences and to managers of the yellow perch (Perca flavescens) fishery in western Lake Erie.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Charles P Madenjian, PhD

##### Research Fisheries Biologist

Great Lakes Science Center

cmadenjian@usgs.gov

734-214-7259

## Related Content

#### Charles P Madenjian, PhD

##### Research Fisheries Biologist

Great Lakes Science Center

cmadenjian@usgs.gov

734-214-7259

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Great Lakes Science Center          

1451 Green RoadAnn Arbor, MI48105United States

734-994-3331

734-994-8780

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Michigan
                  -  Ohio
                  -  Ontario
                  - Western Lake Erie

View All **
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

55412

Vol. 60, No. 210

Tuesday, October 31, 1995

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36381; File No. SR-CBOE95-38]

Self-Regulatory Organizations;

Chicago Board Options Exchange,

Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule

Change Relating to the Listing and

Trading of Warrants on the CBOE

Technology 50 Index

Correction

In notice document 95–26182

beginning on page 54395 in the issue of

Monday, October 23, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 54398, in the second column,

the signature before the FR Doc. line

was omitted and should read as follows:

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36311; File No. SR-NASD95-34]

Self-Regulatory Organizations;

National Association of Securities

Dealers, Inc.; Order Granting

Temporary Approval of Proposed Rule

Change to Extend Certain SOES Rules

Through January 31, 1996

September 29, 1995.

Correction

In notice document 95–24909

beginning on page 52438 in the issue of

Friday, October 6, 1995, the date was

omitted and should read as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Rel. No. IC-21414; 811-7752]

PaineWebber Premier Intermediate

Tax-Free Income Fund, Inc.; Notice of

Application

Correction

In notice document 95–25818

beginning on page 53949 in the issue of

Wednesday, October 18, 1995, make the

following corrections:

On page 53949, in the the third

column, in the subject heading and

under APPLICANT, ‘‘PaineWebber’’ was

misspelled.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifying non-thermal silicate weathering using Ge/Si and Si isotopes in rivers draining the Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field, USA      

      October 26, 2021    

In active volcanic regions, high-temperature chemical reactions in the hydrothermal system consume CO2 sourced from magma or from the deep crust, whereas reactions with silicates at shallow depths mainly consume atmospheric CO2. Numerous studies have quantified the load of dissolved solids in rivers that drain volcanic regions to determine chemical weathering rates and atmospheric CO2 consumption rates. However, the balance between thermal and non-thermal components to riverine fluxes in these areas remains poorly constrained, hindering accurate estimates of atmospheric CO2 consumption rates. Here we use the Ge/Si ratio and the stable silicon isotopes (δ30Si) as tracers for quantifying non-thermal silicon contributions in rivers draining the Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field, USA. The Ge/Si ratio (μmol.mol−1) was determined for seven thermal water samples (183 ± 22), eight rivers (35 ± 23) and six creeks flowing into Yellowstone Lake (5 ± 3) during base flow and during peak water discharge following snowmelt. The δ30Si value (‰) was determined for thermal waters (−0.09 ± 0.04), Yellowstone River at Yellowstone Lake outlet (1.91 ± 0.23) and creek samples (0.82 ± 0.29). The calculated atmospheric CO2 consumption associated with non-thermal waters flowing through Yellowstone's rivers during peak discharge is ∼3.03 ton.km−2.yr−1, which is ∼2% of the annual mean atmospheric CO2 consumption in other volcanic regions. This study highlights the significance of quantifying seasonal variations in chemical weathering rates for improving estimates of atmospheric CO2 consumption rates in active volcanic regions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Shaul Hurwitz

##### Research Hydrologist

California Volcano Observatory

shaulh@usgs.gov

#### R. Blaine McCleskey

##### Research Chemist

Water Resources Mission Area

rbmccles@usgs.gov

303-541-3071

## Related Content

#### Shaul Hurwitz

##### Research Hydrologist

California Volcano Observatory

shaulh@usgs.gov

#### R. Blaine McCleskey

##### Research Chemist

Water Resources Mission Area

rbmccles@usgs.gov

303-541-3071

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - yellowstone plateau volcanic field
                  - Wyoming

View All **