alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 

 

                                            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE        OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                                                              PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                  In connection with the amended quarterly report of United EcoEnergy Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted        pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.          

September 9, 2009

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel        --------------------------------------        Kelly T. Hickel        Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

51835

Vol. 60, No. 191

Tuesday, October 3, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census

Notice of Proposal to Submit

Information Collection to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB)

Correction

In notice document 95–23524

beginning on page 49249 in the issue of

Friday, September 22, 1995, make the

following correction:

On the same page, in the second

column, in the first paragraph under the

heading DATES, in the second line,

‘‘(insert 60 days after publication date).’’

should read ‘‘November 21, 1995.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-808]

Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the

People’s Republic of China; Final

Results of Antidumping Administrative

Review

Correction

In notice document 95–23334

beginning on page 48687 in the issue of

Wednesday, September 20, 1995, in the

first column, under EFFECTIVE DATE

,

‘‘October 20, 1995.’’ should read

‘‘September 20, 1995.’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.27    
    


 
    Summary of Unwritten Compensation Arrangements
  Applicable to Non-Employee Directors of Overstock.com, Inc.    
    



        During 2011 the Company paid its non-employee directors $60,000 annually, at the rate of $15,000 per quarter. During 2012
the Company will pay its non-employee directors $50,000 annually, at the rate of $12,500 per quarter. The Company also grants restricted stock units to directors, generally at the first
Board meeting after the director first joins the Board, and periodically thereafter. In 2011, the Company granted restricted stock units to non-employee directors as follows: 

 






							
	Name



 
	 	Grant Date 	 	Number of

Restricted Stock Units

Granted(1) 	 
	 Allison H. Abraham
	 	May 4, 2011	 	 	8,000	 
	 Barclay F. Corbus
	 	May 4, 2011	 	 	8,000	 
	 Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. 
	 	May 4, 2011	 	 	8,000	 
	 John J. Byrne
	 	May 4, 2011	 	 	8,000	 
	 Samuel A. Mitchell
	 	May 4, 2011	 	 	8,000	 









 


 	(1)
	Each
restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of Overstock.com, Inc. common stock. The restricted stock units vest as
to 25% at the close of business on the first anniversary of the date of grant, 25% at the second anniversary of the date of grant, and the remaining 50% at the third anniversary of the date of grant.
Vested shares are delivered promptly after the restricted stock units vest. 


 

         The
Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Haverford Valley, L.C., an
affiliate of the Company, and certain affiliated entities which make travel arrangements for the Company's executives, also occasionally make travel arrangements for directors to attend Board
meetings, for which the Company reimburses Haverford Valley at rates not in excess of commercially available airline rates. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.27


Summary of Unwritten Compensation Arrangements Applicable to Non-Employee Directors of Overstock.com, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 5253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-120126]



[[Page 5253]]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35120; File No. SR-PSE-94-22]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Providing for the 
Execution of Cross Transactions on the PSE Equities Floors

Correction

    In notice document 94-31674 beginning on page 66580, in the issue 
of Tuesday, December 27, 1994, make the following correction:
    On page 66581, in the second column, before the FR document line, 
the signature line was omitted and should have appeared as follows:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 6 -00 565 -CR

Thom as Le o W ilfo r d , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-06 -20 0059 , HO NORAB LE F RED A. MO ORE , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N A j ur y fo un d a pp e ll a nt T h o m a s L e o W i l f

o r d g uil ty of a g g ra vate d a ssa ult wi th a de a dly
wea pon and asse ssed his punishment at twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. Appellant’s cour t-appointed counsel ha s filed a br ief in which he states that the appe al in this cause is fr i v o l o u s. Se eAn de rs
v . Ca lif or nia , 3 86 U. S. 7 38 (1 96 7) ; se eals o Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Cur riev . S tate , 5 16 S.W. 2d

68 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The State, in it s re s ponsive brief , urg es that appe llant’s counsel ha s not complied with An de rs , High , and Cur rie
. The S tate complains that counsel’s brief doe s not “point out where pertinent testimony may be found in the r ecor d, ref er t o p age s in the rec ord whe re objections wer e made , the nature of the objec tion, the trial court’s ruling, and discuss either why the trial court’ s ruling w as co rr ec t or why the appe llant was not harme d by the rulingof the c ourt.” High , 573 S.W .2d at 813.2 We agree with the St at e. T h e appeal is abated. A ppellant’s counse l, Todd Steven Dudley , is ordere d to tender a new br ief fully

complying w ith An de rs and High no later tha n Dec ember

31, 2007. No extension of time for filingwill be g rante d.

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Waldrop a nd Henson Abated Filed: Nove mber 30, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that one meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate):

*AccessAbility (application review):*                     May 14, 2009. This meeting, from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., will be closed.                

                    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in                           ( print page 19605)                        confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 28, 2008, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.                

                    Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506,                     *plowitzk@arts.endow.gov,*                     or call 202/682-5691.                

Dated: April 24, 2009.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden, 

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts. 

[FR Doc. E9-9741 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Derek Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry C.J. Ehrl, President, CEO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 30, 2005



DEREK OIL & GAS CORPORATION





/s/ Barry C.J. Ehrl

_______________________
Barry C.J. Ehrl

President, CEO and Director
Exhibit 31.1

I, Lawrence Schaffer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Case Financial,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  company's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's  internal  control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have  indicated in this  quarterly  report  whether there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.


/s/ Lawrence Schaffer
------------------------
Lawrence Schaffer
Chief Financial Officer
March 2, 2005
Juan Francisco VEGA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 19-17088-JKO 

VICTOR HERRERA CHAPTER 13 

 

Debtor, 

________________________________/ 

 

 

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE BY ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR WITH LOCAL 

RULE

2083-1(B) CLAIMS REVIEW 

REQUIREMENT

The undersigned attorney for debtor certifies that a review of the claims register 

and all claims filed in the above referenced case has been completed in accordance 

with Local Rule 2083-1(B) and that: 

1) No further action is necessary. 

2) The following actions have been taken: 

 The debtor has filed an objection to the proof of claim filed 

by 

 

 The debtor has filed a amended plan or modified plan to 

provide for the proof of claim filed by 

 . 

 Other: 

. 

A copy of this certificate of compliance was served on the chapter 13 trustee 

via the NEF and the debtor via U.S. Mail on October 7, 2019. 

 

 

 

Case 19-17088-JKO Doc 43 Filed 10/07/19 Page 1 of 2
 CORONA LAW FIRM, P.A. 

 /s/ Ricardo Corona, Esq. 

 RICARDO R. CORONA, ESQ. 

 Florida Bar No. 111333 

 3899 NW 7 Street, Second Floor 

 Miami, FL 33126 

 (305) 547-1234 Phone 

(888) 554-5607 Fax 

bk@coronapa.com 

Case 19-17088-JKO Doc 43 Filed 10/07/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 3.3

                        FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                          OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                         OF DICOM IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
          -------------------------------------------------------------
                        Pursuant to Section 78.390 of the
                 General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada
          -------------------------------------------------------------

         The undersigned President and Secretary of Dicom Imaging Systems, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby certify as follows:

         FIRST: The Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted a
resolution setting forth and declaring advisable the amendment of Article I of
the Articles of Incorporation so that, as amended, the First Article shall
state:

"First:  Name

         The name of the corporation is Reality Wireless Networks, Inc. (the
"Corporation")."

         SECOND: The number of shares of outstanding and entitled to vote on an
amendment of the Articles of Incorporation is 26,632,653 shares of common stock.
In lieu of a vote of stockholders, written consent to the foregoing amendment
has been given by a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon
in accordance with the provisions of Section 78.320 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Nevada.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF AND UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, Dicom Imaging Systems,
Inc. has signed this Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation to be
signed by its President and Secretary this 21st day of November, 2001.

                                            DICOM IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.



                                            By: _____________________________
                                                Dr. David Gane,
                                                President and Secretary
#### William W. Owens, Respondent-Appellant, *v.*Italia Societa Per Azione Di Navigazione-Genova, Also Known as Italian Line Steamship Company, Appellant-Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

July 27, 1973.

*105
      *Boy all, Koegel ¡é Wells (William W. Owens,*in person, of counsel), for respondent-appellant. *Kirlin, Campbell & Keating {John W. Kenny, Louis J. Gusmano*and *John B. Geraghby*of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Lupiano and Quinn, JJ.
Order entered February 6 , 2023

In The



### Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 01002

- CR

JAY SANDON COOPER

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 86065

- 2019

O RDER

Before the C ourt is appellant ’ s January 18, 2023 motion to modify the

Court ’ s order entered on Octo ber 2 6 , 2022. We DENY th e motion.

/s/ NAN CY KENNEDY

JUSTICE
# L_2004312EN.01001101.xml

| 9.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 312/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 312/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1753/2004

of 8 October 2004

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 October 2004 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of November 2004 for 4 331,540 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 October 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Progress in global lake drilling holds potential for global change research      

      January 8, 2002    

During the past decade, numerous international investigations of past global change have focused on particular time intervals, or “Time Streams,” suggested by the Past Global Changes (PAGES) Project of the International Geosphere‐Biosphere Programme (IGBP). Time Stream 1 encompasses the last 2000 years, and Time Stream 2 encompasses at least the last 250,000 years. Geographically many of these studies have been grouped into north‐south transects of continental global change records known as the Pole‐Equator‐Pole (PEP) transects [Bradley et al., 1995]. These continental transects have been complemented by the study of marine records included in the International Marine Global Change Study (IMAGES) transects and high‐latitude ice core records such as those from the U.S. Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2) and the European Greenland Ice‐core Project (GRIP).

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Bear River drainage system
                  - Idaho
                  -  Utah

View All **
David M. HODIERNE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0335

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.