alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAUL REYNOSO , Appellant,

v.

CITY OF BOCA RATON , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2427

[ April 24, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Gerard Joseph Curley, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CA

- 000250

- XXXX

- MB

.
Richard A. Sicking and Mark A. Touby of Touby, Chait & Sicking, P.L., Coral Gables, for appellant.

Laura K. Wendell, Daniel L. Abbott and Richard B. Rosengarten of Weiss Serota Helfman C ole & Bierman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed . See Baker v. Airguide Mfg., LLC, 151 So. 3d 38 (Fla

. 3d DCA 2014).

M AY , C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
From: Meehan, Clair

Subject: Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule - September 24 webinar follow-up

Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:04:44 PM

Attachments: WQS Webinar 2013 09 23_Final.pdf

Thank you for participating in EPA’s September 24 webinar on the Water Quality

Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule. Attached, please find a copy of the

slides shared today. As mentioned during the webinar, the correct email for sending

clarifying questions is: WQSRegulatoryClarifications@epa.gov.

HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON THE RULEMAKING

Written comments must be received by the last day of the comment period, December

3, 2013.

If you wish to submit a comment on the proposed rule, your comment must be

directed to the associated docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606) by one of

the following methods:

· Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online

instructions for submitting comments.

· Email: ow-docket@epa.gov.

· Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Attention: Docket ID No. EPA–

HQ–OW–2010–0606.

· Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA West Room 3334, 1301 Constitution

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004, Attention: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2010–

0606. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Center’s normal

hours of operation. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed

information by calling 202–566–2426.

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE RULEMAKING

More information about the proposed rulemaking is available on EPA’s website at:

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/wqs_index.cfm.

For more information about submitting your public comments, please refer to the

notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register

(http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-04/pdf/2013-21140.pdf).

QUESTIONS?

For more information about the public meeting or webinars, please contact: Ms. Janita

Aguirre, US EPA, at 202.566.1149 or aguirre.janita@epa.gov. If you have additional

clarifying questions about the proposed rule, please contact US EPA at the phone and

email address dedicated to this rulemaking: 202-566-1860 or

WQSRegulatoryClarifications@epa.gov.
Clair Meehan | Environmental Scientist

clair.meehan@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech | Complex World, Clear Solutions

www.tetratech.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information.

Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from

your system.

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Springdale, Utah, landslide: An extraordinary event      

      January 1, 1996    

The most dramatic geologic effect of the M-5.7 St. George, Utah earthquake of 2 September 1992 was the triggering of the 14,000,000-m3 Springdale, Utah landslide. The roughly 10 m of landslide movement destroyed three houses, threatened several condominiums, disrupted utility lines, and temporarily closed the southwest entrance to Zion National Park. The seismic triggering of this landslide is puzzling because its distance from the earthquake epicenter, 44 km, is much greater than the farthest distance (18 km) at which similar landslides have been triggered in worldwide earthquakes of the same magnitude. Other Colorado Plateau earthquakes also have produced landslides far beyond worldwide distance limits, which suggests that regional variations in ground-shaking attenuation may require different landslide-triggering distance limits for different seismotectonic regions. Slope stability analysis and historical records of landslide movement suggest that the Springdale landslide was only slightly above limit-equilibrium conditions at the time of the earthquake. Dynamic stability analysis using Newmark's permanent-displacement method indicates coseismic landslide displacement of only 1-8 cm; this rather modest displacement probably induced enough deformation in the montmorillonitic clays along the failure surface to reduce shear strength and destabilize the slide, which continued to move for several hours after the earthquake.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Utah

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: MARCO T. BARRIOS CASE NUMBER:20-19836-AJC

MARIA BARRIOS

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for December 15, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the December 15, 

2020 hearing were due as of November 25, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior 

to "re-sending" documents)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

Continue to 1/26:

Due on or before 5pm on 1/7: 1) Object or Conform to POC No. 25 of United Consumer (Creditor not listed 

in plan and collateral not disclosed on schedules-amend schedules accordingly, 2) Reset Motion to Value (ECF 

No. 18) for hearing as of trustee’s review Motion was not continued from November 17 hearing, 3) Address 

feasibility issue

Case 20-19836-AJC Doc 39 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

8514

Vol. 62, No. 37

Tuesday, February 25, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Commercial Encryption Items

Correction

In notice document 97–3413,

beginning on page 6515, in the issue of

Wednesday, February 12, 1997, in the

DATES section, ‘‘Febraury 12, 1997.’’

should read ‘‘April 14, 1997.’’.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AWP-23]

Proposed Establishment of Class E

Airspace; Atwater, CA

Correction

In proposed rule document 97–2422

appearing on page 4668 in the issue of

Friday, January 31, 1997 make the

following correction:

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

In the third column, § 71.1, airspace

description following Castle Airport,

CA, line five, ‘‘410°’’ should read

‘‘310°’’.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Toxic Substances and

Disease Registry

Public Meeting of the Inter-Tribal

Council on Hanford Health Projects

(ICHHP), in Association With the

Meeting of the Citizens Advisory

Committee on Public Health Service

Activities and Research at Department

of Energy (DOE) Sites: Hanford Health

Effects Subcommittee

Correction

In notice document 97–3732

beginning on page 6973 in the issue of

Friday, February 14, 1997 make the

following correction:

The meeting schedule in the third

column is corrected below.

Dates: February 19, 1997 May 7, 1997

Times: 9 a.m.–5 p.m. 9 a.m.–5 p.m.

Place: Red Lion Hotel/Jantzen Beach

909 North Hayden Island Drive

Portland, Oregon 97217

Cavanaugh’s at Columbia Center

1101 Columbia Center Boulevard

Kennewick, Washington 99336

Tel: 503/283–4466 509/783–0611

Fax: 503/283–4743 509/735–3087

Dates: July 23, 1997 October 8, 1997

Times: 9 a.m.–5 p.m. 9 a.m.–5 p.m.

Place: Marines’ Memorial Club

609 Sutter Street (at Mason)

San Francisco, California 94102

Coeur d’Alene Inn

West 414 Appleway

Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83814

Tel: 415/673–6672 208/765–3200

Fax: 415/441–3649 208/664–1962

Date: December 10, 1997

Time: 9 a.m.–5 p.m.

Place: Madison Hotel

515 Madison Street

Seattle, Washington 98104

Tel: 206/583–0300

Fax: 206/624–8125

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Seismic reflection profiling across Tertiary extensional structures in the eastern Amargosa Desert, southern Nevada, Basin and Range province      

      January 1, 1993    

Outcrops, shallow well control, and coincident geophysical surveys are used to interpret a seismic reflection profile in the Amargosa Desert, within the Basin and Range province, of southern Nevada. The east-west-trending, 27-km-long seismic line crosses all or parts of three Tertiary subbasins, revealing that basin growth occurred by progressive shifts of basin-bounding faults. The reflection line images Tertiary strata that is rotated by steeply dipping listric faults and that noses into normal faults. A shallow (less than 100 to 200 m deep), laterally continuous, flat-lying, low-frequency reflector, interpreted as a Tertiary basalt flow, suggests that little vertical deformation has occurred within the easternmost of the small Tertiary basins since the eruption of the flow about 10 million years ago. Moderately dipping reflections within the pre-Tertiary bedrock may image Mesozoic thrust faults. The reflection data indicate that, whereas the top of the reflective lower crust shallows to the west, possibly in the direction of increasing crustal extension, the Moho is relatively flat between 30 and 33 km deep. Apparent bright-spot reflections from the lower crust are interpreted as evidence for ductile shearing of the lower crust, not for active magma chambers. Doming of the lower crust resembles that observed elsewhere in the Basin and Range province and is consistent with ductile flow in the lower crust.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contacts
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-26 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-26 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
7234 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 7, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–3129 Filed 2–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190–01–C
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Phylogeography of declining relict and lowland leopard frogs in the desert Southwest of North America      

      January 1, 2010    

We investigated the phylogeography of the closely related relict leopard frog Rana onca (=Lithobates onca) and lowland leopard frog Rana yavapaiensis (=Lithobates yavapaiensis) – two declining anurans from the warm‐desert regions of south‐western North America. We used sequence data from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to assess 276 individuals representing 30 sites from across current distributions. Our analysis supports a previously determined phylogenetic break between these taxa, and we found no admixing of R. onca and R. yavapaiensis haplotypes within our extensive sampling of sites. Our phylogeographic assessment, however, further divided R. yavapaiensis into two distinct mtDNA lineages, one representing populations across Arizona and northern Mexico and the other a newly discovered population within the western Grand Canyon, Arizona. Estimates of sequence evolution indicate a possible Early Pleistocene divergence of R. onca and R. yavapaiensis, followed by a Middle Pleistocene separation of the western Grand Canyon population of R. yavapaiensis from the main R. yavapaiensis clade. Phylogeographic and demographic analyses indicate population or range expansion for R. yavapaiensis within its core distribution that appears to predate the latest glacial maximum. Species distribution models under current and latest glacial climatic conditions suggest that R. onca and R. yavapaiensis may not have greatly shifted ranges.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  -  Mexico
                  - Arizona
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Utah
                  -  New Mexico

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40331]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Esther PENA and Lorenzo Pena, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

RON VIGDOR

XXX-XX-4069

_____________________________/

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM

DEBTOR

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the February 4, 2021 Consent Calendar without opposition on

Robin R. Weiner, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee's ("Trustee") Objection to Claim of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 

EDUCATION, and based on the record, it is

ORDERED:

1. The Trustee's Objection is SUSTAINED.

2. Court Claim number 15, filed by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION is stricken and disallowed.

###

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 8, 2021.

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 54 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 3
ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

ORDER SUBMITTED BY:

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

954-382-2001

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

RON VIGDOR

5204 LANE PARKE COURT

MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL 35223

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

CHRISTIAN J. OLSON, ESQUIRE

C/O NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

8551 SUNRISE BLVD, SUITE 208

PLANTATION, FL 33322

CREDITOR

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

C/O FEDLOAN SERVICING

POB 790234

ST. LOUIS, MO 63179

ADDITIONAL CREDITORS

US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

C/O FEDLOAN SERVICING

POB 69184

HARRISBURG, PA 17106

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

ATTN: BENJAMIN G. GREENBERG, US ATTORNEY

99 NE 4TH STREET

MIAMI, FL 33132

WILLIAM BARR, US ATTORNEY GENERAL

US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

950 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NW

WASHINGTON, DC 20530

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

C/O BETSY DEVOS, EDUCATION SECRETARY

400 MARYLAND AVE., SW

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 54 Filed 02/08/21 Page 2 of 3
ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

ARIANA FAJARDO ORSHAN

US ATTY S.D. FL

500 E. BROWARD BLVD.

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33394

ROBIN R. WEINER IS DIRECTED TO SERVE COPIES OF THIS ORDER UPON THE PARTIES 

LISTED AND FILE A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 54 Filed 02/08/21 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4902 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4902

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2016

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to expand law enforcement 
 availability pay to employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection's 
                       Air and Marine Operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AVAILABILITY PAY FOR EMPLOYEES OF CUSTOMS 
              AND BORDER PROTECTION'S AIR AND MARINE OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5545a(i) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``apply to a pilot employed by the United 
        States Customs Service'' and inserting ``apply to any employee 
        of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Air and Marine 
        Operations, or any successor organization,''; and
            (2) by striking ``such pilot'' and inserting ``such 
        employee''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first applicable pay period 
beginning on or after the date that is 14 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,164,496
<SECURITIES>                                56,370,346
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,158,018
<PP&E>                                         733,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,352,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,776,855
<BONDS>                                         22,105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   156,630,658
<OTHER-SE>                                (70,077,268)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,352,350
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,409,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,409,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,409,827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,409,827)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)


</TABLE>
C.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00145-CV

Arthur BOUIER,

Appellant

v.

JEFF 1, LLC,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-00448

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Appellant is unable to afford payment of costs; no costs of court 

are taxed for this appeal. 

SIGNED June 9, 2021.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Rainfall limit of the N cycle on Earth      

      January 1, 2007    

In most climates on Earth, biological processes control soil N. In the Atacama Desert of Chile, aridity severely limits biology, and soils accumulate atmospheric NO3−. We examined this apparent transformation of the soil N cycle using a series of ancient Atacama Desert soils (>2 My) that vary in rainfall (21 to <2 mm yr−1). With decreasing rainfall, soil organic C decreases to 0.3 kg C m−2 and biological activity becomes minimal, while soil NO3− and organic N increase to 4 kg N m−2 and 1.4 kg N m−2, respectively. Atmospheric NO3− (Δ17O = 23.0‰) increases from 39% to 80% of total soil NO3− as rainfall decreases. These soils capture the transition from a steady state, biologically mediated soil N cycle to a dominantly abiotic, transient state of slowly accumulating atmospheric N. This transition suggests that oxidized soil N may be present in an even more arid and abiotic environment: Mars.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States