alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form CGFCRD3Z (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 20−12895−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re:

Charles Rayfield Rhodes

aka Jack Rhodes

1111 S 29th Ave

Hollywood, FL 33020

SSN: xxx−xx−8460

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Peter D. Russin to consider the

following:

Motion to Dismiss Case For Other Reason Filed by Attorney City of Hollywood FL (Breeden,

Kendra) (147)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: September 13, 2021

Time: 01:00 PM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although

conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom

must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and otherwise conduct

themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day

before the date of the hearing. To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimENeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 8/23/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Christina Romero

Courtroom Deputy

Case 20-12895-PDR Doc 148 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-120425]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EX PARTE Anthony S. PAPINEAU

CR-15-1303

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 5, 2017

Mand. pet. dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Responses of bat social groups to roost loss: More questions than answers      

      June 30, 2016    

Though characterization of, and understanding determinants of, social structure in bats is increasing, little is known about how bat social groups respond to disturbance resulting in roost loss. Given that many species of bats roost in ephemeral or transitory resources such as plants, it is clear that bat social groups can tolerate some level of roost loss. Understanding responses of bat social groups to roost loss can provide insight into social structure that have applied conservation use. Herein, we review the existing literature on the effects of disturbance on bat social groups, and present a parameterizable agent-based model that can be used to explore the relationships among roost dynamics, population dynamics, and social behavior.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Ford, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

wford@usgs.gov

540-231-5927

## Related Content

#### Mark Ford, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

wford@usgs.gov

540-231-5927

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 

TO THE 
 STRATEGIC
HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. 
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 INCENTIVE PLAN 

Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 16.1 of the Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Second Amended and Restated
2004 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) amends the Plan as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 14.2 Effect of a Change of Control is modified to permit the grant of Awards which do not
provide for automatic acceleration of vesting immediately prior to the consummation of a Change of Control and such sentence shall read as follows: 
 “Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, in the event of any Change of Control, each Award that is at the time outstanding shall automatically accelerate so that each such Award shall,
immediately prior to the consummation of the Change of Control, become 100% vested.” 
 2. In all other respects, the Plan,
as amended, shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to
be executed this 21st day of February, 2012. 
  

	
	STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
	
	/s/ Paula C. Maggio
	 By: Paula C. Maggio

Its: Senior Vice President, Secretary &
       General Counsel
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

Case No.: 19-22483-JKO

Costa Hollywood Property Owner, LLC,

Chapter 11

Debtor.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF RECUSAL

THIS CASE is before the Court sua sponte. Upon consideration, the Court recuses itself 

from consideration of this case and directs the Clerk to reassign the case to another judge. All 

currently scheduled hearings are CANCELLED and shall be reset by the new judge.

SO ORDERED.

# # #

Copies to: All Parties in Interest

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 4, 2019.

John K. Olson, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-22483-AJC Doc 130 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 1
Malik A. ALDRICH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 1 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 2 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 3 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 4 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 5 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 6 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 7 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 8 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 9 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 10 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 11 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 12 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 13 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 14 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 15 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 16 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 17 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 18 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 19 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 20 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 21 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 22 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 23 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 24 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 25 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 26 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 27 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 28 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 29 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 30 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 31 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 32 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 33 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 34 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 35 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 36 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 37 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 38 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 39 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 40 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 41 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 42 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 43 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 44 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 45 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 46 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 47 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 48 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 49 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 50 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 51 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 52 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 53 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 54 of 55
Case 19-27189-RAM Doc 1 Filed 12/30/19 Page 55 of 55
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
        undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
        Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that
        the Quarterly Report of Nathaniel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form
        10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934,
        as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
        10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of the Company.
  Date: November
                    14, 2007By:
                  */s/
                      Barry J. Kemble*Barry
                    J. KembleChief
                        Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Monitoring Tamarix changes using WorldView-2 satellite imagery in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona      

      March 4, 2021    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

April 12, 2021

####                 Northern tamarisk beetle impact and classification maps, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona              

Southwest Biological Science Center

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

April 12, 2021

####                 Northern tamarisk beetle impact and classification maps, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona              

Southwest Biological Science Center

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Grand Canyon National Park
                  - Arizona

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The nature of carbon dioxide waters in Snaefellsnes, western Iceland      

      January 1, 1983    

Over 20 occurrences of thermal and non-thermal waters rich in carbon dioxide are known in the Snaefellsnes Peninsula of western Iceland. On the basis of the thermal, chemical and isotopic characteristics of these waters, and hydrological considerations, it is concluded that they represent meteoric waters which have seeped to variable depths into the bedrock. Ascending carbon dioxide gas originating from intrusions or the mantle mixes with the meteoric waters to produce carbon dioxide waters: at considerable depth in the case of the thermal carbon dioxide waters but close to the surface in the case of cold carbon dioxide waters. The occurrence of carbon dioxide waters cannot be regarded as evidence for underground geothermal reservoirs.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Iceland

View All **
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41197

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN HERRERA-MIJARES, also known

as Martin Villa-Diaz,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-03-CR-290-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martin Herrera-Mijares appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Herrera-Mijares contends that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are

unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must

be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8
No. 03-41197

-2-

U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a

conviction only under that provision, and his sentence must be

vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than

two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Herrera-Mijares acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Red knot stopover population size and migration ecology at Delaware Bay, USA, 2022      

      December 30, 2022    

Red Knots (Calidris canutus rufa) stop at Delaware Bay on the mid-Atlantic coast of North America during northward migration to feed on eggs of horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus). In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the number of Red Knots found at Delaware Bay declined from ~50,000 to ~13,000. Horseshoe crabs have been harvested for use as bait in eel (Anguilla rostrata) and whelk (Busycon) fisheries since at least 1990, and some avian conservation biologists hypothesized that horseshoe crab harvest levels in the 1990s prevented sufficient refueling for successful migration to the breeding grounds, nesting, and survival for the remainder of the annual cycle. Since 2013, the harvest of horseshoe crabs in the Delaware Bay region has been managed using an Adaptive Resource Management (ARM) framework. The objective of the ARM framework is to manage sustainable harvest of Delaware Bay horseshoe crabs while maintaining ecosystem integrity and supporting Red Knot recovery with adequate stopover habitat for Red Knots and other migrating shorebirds. For annual harvest recommendations, the ARM framework requires annual estimates of horseshoe crab population size and the Red Knot stopover population size. We conducted a mark-recapture-resight investigation to estimate the passage population of Red Knots at Delaware Bay in 2022. We used a Bayesian analysis of a Jolly-Seber model, which accounts for turnover in the population and the probability of detection during surveys. The 2022 Red Knot mark-resight dataset

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### James E Lyons, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jelyons@usgs.gov

301-497-5567

## Related Content

#### James E Lyons, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jelyons@usgs.gov

301-497-5567

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Delaware
                  -  New Jersey
                  - Delaware Bay

View All **
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USDOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,029
<SECURITIES>                                       355
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,233
<PP&E>                                           2,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,636
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,120)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,033
<SALES>                                         12,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,922
<CGS>                                              764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,611)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)


</TABLE>
Case 19-25894-JKO Doc 11 Filed 12/10/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-25894-JKO Doc 11 Filed 12/10/19 Page 2 of 2
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

9079

Vol. 60, No. 32

Thursday, February 16, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

7 CFR Part 1755

Standard for Splicing Copper and Fiber

Optic Cables

Correction

In rule document 95–1937 beginning

on page 5096 in the issue of Thursday,

January 26, 1995, make the following

correction:

§1755.200 [Corrected]

On page 5099, in the second column,

in §1755.200(d)(4)(ii), in Table 5, in the

middle column heading ‘‘Maximum

straight splice maximum load splice

pair’’ should read ‘‘Maximum straight

splice pair’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-942-1430-01; U-010084 et al.; 4-00152]

Proposed Continuation of

Withdrawals; Utah

Correction

In notice document 95–2127

beginning on page 5696, in the issue of

Monday, January 30, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 5697, in the first column,

under the heading ‘‘Pine Valley

Recreation Area’’, in the land

description, in T 39 S., R 15 W., ‘‘Sec.

24, SE1⁄4SW1⁄4NW1⁄4, NE1⁄4SE1⁄4,

NE1⁄4NW1⁄4SE1⁄4.’’ should read ‘‘Sec. 24,

SE1⁄4SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, NE1⁄4SE1⁄4,

NE1⁄4NW1⁄4SE1⁄4.’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23

                         [G+G Retail, Inc. letterhead]

                                January 18, 2000

Mr.  Scott Galin

Dear Scott:

         This letter constitutes a further amendment to your employment
agreement (your "Employment Agreement with G+G Retail, Inc. (the "Company")
dated August 28, 1998 as amended on November 18, 1998 and reflects our further
understanding and agreement with respect to your continued employment with the
Company as set forth below.

         1. Capitalized terms which are not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meanings ascribed to those terms in your Employment Agreement.

         2. Paragraph 3.1 of your Employment Agreement is hereby amended to
increase your Salary, effective as of February 1, 2000, to $625,000 per annum.
Such Salary shall also be subject to further periodic increases on each
anniversary of the commencement of the Employment Period and at other times as
provided in said Paragraph.

         3. All other terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

         If the foregoing is in accordance with your agreement and
understanding, please sign below under the words "Agreed to and Accepted".


                                    Very truly yours,

                                    G+G Retail, Inc.

                                    By: /s/ Jay Galin
                                        ----------------------
                                           Jay Galin
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Agreed to and Accepted:

/s/ Scott Galin
----------------------
Scott Galin
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70207]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
Michael P. RYAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2272

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.