1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: CASE NO.: 20-16515-MAM

Chapter 7

JONATHAN RESNICK,

Debtor.

_________________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 

TO COMPROMISE CONTROVERSY [ECF NO. 144]

THIS MATTER came before the Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, upon the Trustee’s Motion 

to Approve Stipulation to Compromise Controversy, [ECF No. 144] and the movant by submitting this 

form of order having represented that the motion was served on all parties required by Bankruptcy Rule 

2002 or Local Rule 2002-1(H), (I) or (J), that the 21 day response time provided by Local Rule 9013-

1(D) has expired, that no one has filed, or served on the movant, a response to the motion, and that the 

form of this court order was attached to an exhibit to the motion, finding that the settlement has been 

properly served on all creditors, is a reasonable settlement and is in the best interest of the estate and 

creditors, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is 

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 24, 2021.

Case 20-16515-MAM Doc 149 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 3
2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion to Approve Stipulation to Compromise Controversy (“Motion”) is 

GRANTED.

2. The Stipulation to Compromise Controversy (“Stipulation”) is APPROVED in its 

entirety and its terms are hereby incorporated by reference into this Order in their entirety. 

3. The Court approves the settlement as to any avoidance claims the Trustee may have 

against Perry Resnick for the sum of $7,500.00 to be paid to the Trustee as outlined within the 

Stipulation.

4. The Court approves the settlement as to any avoidance claims the Trustee may have 

against Diane Resnick for the sum of $7,500.00 to be paid to the Trustee as outlined within the 

Stipulation.

5. The Debtor has agreed to waive his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §727(a)(10). 

Accordingly, a final judgment within the Discharge Action shall be entered denying discharge.

6. The Debtor’s denial of discharge shall be treated as a denial of discharge for purposes of 

termination of the automatic stay as to KrunchCash.

7. Upon payment in full of the amount of funds referenced in paragraphs three (3) and four 

(4) above, and presuming that there has been no failure to cooperate as set forth within the Stipulation, 

the Joint Objection to Exemptions (as defined within the Motion) shall be overruled pursuant to a 

separate court order to be submitted to the Court immediately upon entry of this order. 

Case 20-16515-MAM Doc 149 Filed 06/25/21 Page 2 of 3
3

8. The Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order and Stipulation.

###

Submitted by:

MICHAEL R. BAKST, ESQ.

CityPlace Tower

525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 900

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

T: (561) 838-4523 F: (561) 514-3423

Email: michael.bakst@gmlaw.com

(Michael R. Bakst, Esq. shall serve a copy of the signed Order on all interested parties and file with the 

Court a certificate of service conforming with Local Rule 2002-1(F)).

Case 20-16515-MAM Doc 149 Filed 06/25/21 Page 3 of 3