alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1757

In re: DAVID HILL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

Submitted: September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1757 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district 

court to grant Hill’s motions for relief from judgment in a civil action and for 

reconsideration of the court’s order imposing a prefiling injunction (PFI) in his criminal 

case. We conclude that Hill is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to 

attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal 

quotation marks omitted). 

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 

503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), and we previously affirmed the district court’s order 

denying Hill’s motions, see United States v. Hill, No. 23-7052, 2024 WL 1406218 (4th Cir. 

Apr. 2, 2024). To the extent that the instant petition also contains substantive challenges 

to the PFI, we observe that Hill has already unsuccessfully challenged the PFI on appeal, 

see United States v. Hill, No. 22-7439, 2023 WL 3734977 (4th Cir. May 31, 2023), and 

thus his current challenges are not properly before us. 

Because, at bottom, the relief sought by Hill is not available by way of mandamus, 

we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1757 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1757 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2021

No. 04-21-00164-CV

Melissa WALLACE and Top Drawer Property Solutions, LLC,

Appellants

v.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI17915

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

In this appeal, opposing parties filed notices of appeal. Appellants’ brief is due on 

September 16, 2021. 

Before the due date, the parties filed a joint motion asking this court to adopt their 

proposed briefing schedule and to increase the parties’ respective aggregate word counts to 

37,500 words. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2). 

The parties’ joint motion is GRANTED. The applicable aggregate word count will be 

37,500 words—to accommodate an opening brief, a response brief, and a reply brief. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 9.4(i). The briefs must comply with all other length and content requirements 

established by the applicable Rules. E.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i), 38.1, 38.2, 38.3. 

The parties will submit their briefs according to the following schedule:

Due Date Documents

September 16, 2021 Appellant’s opening brief

October 18, 2021 Appellee’s opening/response brief

FILE COPY
November 17, 2021 Appellant’s response/reply brief

December 7, 2021 Appellee’s reply brief

Any additional request for an extension of time to file a brief is discouraged. See, e.g., 

TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Opinion issued June 2, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 15 - 00298 - CV

——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF C .M. AND C. F., A CHI LD On Appeal from the 306th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 13 - CP - 0068
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal. More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motion, and no party has objected to dismissal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.3(a). No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the2

appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale
.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4778 

To direct the Comptroller General to submit to Congress a report on medical 

items and services being offered in the facilities of recipients of assistance 

under title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300 et 

seq.) or of their affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or clinics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Mrs. ELLMERS of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General to submit to Congress 

a report on medical items and services being offered 

in the facilities of recipients of assistance under title 

X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300 

et seq.) or of their affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, 

or clinics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Title X Transparency 

5 Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4778 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON MEDICAL ITEMS AND SERVICES BEING 

2 OFFERED BY RECIPIENTS OF TITLE X ASSIST3 ANCE. 

4 Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 

6 shall submit to Congress a report containing an evaluation 

7 of all medical items and services being offered in the facili8 ties of recipients of assistance under title X of the Public 

9 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300 et seq.) or of their 

10 affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or clinics. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Blues

102.08868
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 UNDER
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Michael R. Haynes, Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Collectors Universe, Inc., for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
 made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:
  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
 registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: October 1, 2003/s/ MICHAEL R. HAYNESMichael R. HaynesChief Executive Officer
### No. 14790 INTHE SUPREMECOURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1979

IN RE THEMARRIAGE OF BARBARAANN ROBINSON, Petitioner and Respondent, and WILLIAM HENRY ROBINSON,JR., Respondent and Appellant.
Appeal from: District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Honorable Nat Allen, Judgepresiding. Counsel of Record: ForAppellant: Ralph L. Herriott, Billings, Montana For Respondent: Tolliver, Guthals and Wright, Billings,Montana

Filed: 

## FEE82 19i' -

### Submitted on briefs: November 7, 

### 1979 Decided: 

## FE6

## 2

## 1 1m

ClerkMr. Justice Daniel J. Sheadelivered the Opinion of the Court.
Thehusband appeals from that portion of a marriage dissolution decree entered by the Yellowstone County DistrictCourt involving the distribution of property. He contends that the trial court failed to enter legally sufficient findings in support of the ultimate conclusions and judgment,and that in any event, the trial court abused its discretion in awarding certain property to the wife. We agree that this case must be remanded because of the failure to enter legally sufficient findings of fact. In apportioning the property the trial court awarded the wife what appears to be a one-half interest in the equity built up in a home which was acquired by the husband before he married his wife for the second time. The husband had purchased the home after the first marriage dissolution so that hewould have a home for himself and the minor child born of the firstmarriage. Without entering findings to support its conclusion, the trial court simply awarded the wife $3,000 as her interest in the home, and, inter alia, entered judgment for that amount. This Court has previously set forth the requirements of section 40-4-202,MCA, in the cases of In Re Marriage of Johnsrud (19771, Mont

# . , 572 P.2d 902, 907, 34 St.Rep. 1417, 1423 and In Re Marriage of Reilly (1978), Mont

# . , 577 P.2d 840, 842, 35 St.Rep. 451, 454,and no additional
cases should have to be cited. Suffice it to say that the findings, measured by these requirements aremanifestly deficient. The wife doesnot dispute that the husband acquired the home after the dissolution of the first divorce and before the parties married for the second time. Neither statute nor case law declare that a party is automatically entitled to a portion of the property acquired before marriage or to a percentage of the value of the property. There are absolutelyno findings indicating that the trial court considered and applied the relevant factors enumerated in section 40-4-202(I),MCA. -2-

### The husband testified that the equity in the home at the time of dissolutionwas between $6,000 and $7,000. However, without the required findingswe cannot tell how or why the trial court arrived at the apportionment of themarital estate in this
case. The lack of findings is similarlydeficient as to the personal property distributed by the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment isvacated and this case is remanded to 

### the District Court for further proceedings consistentwith this opinion.

Justice We Concur:

Chief Justice 

### A'
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Schaffer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  Quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB/A of Case  Financial,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  company,  including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  company's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's  internal  control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have  indicated in this  quarterly  report  whether there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.


/s/ Michael Schaffer
-----------------------
Michael Schaffer,
Chief Executive Officer

May 19, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 32158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30620]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EX-10.38




 Exhibit 10.38 
 EXPEDIA CONFIDENTIAL 
 December 22, 2011 

David Cathcart 
 Chief Financial Officer

 TRX, Inc. 
 2970 Clairmont Road

 Suite 300 
 Atlanta, GA 30329

  

	Re:	Fifth Letter of Amendment 

 Dear David:

 The purpose of this Fifth Letter of Amendment is to further document certain amendments to specified Statements of Work made pursuant to the
Master Service Agreement, dated January 1, 2007, as amended by Amendment #1 on March 30, 2007, Letter of Amendment dated February 19, 2009, Second Letter of Amendment dated December 23, 2009, as amended, Third Letter of Amendment
dated October 29, 2010, Fourth Letter of Amendment dated December 29, 2010 (collectively, the “Agreement”) between Expedia, Inc. (“Expedia”) and TRX, Inc. (“TRX”), and/or their respective subsidiaries.
Capitalized terms, where not defined herein, will have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
  

	1)	TRX and Expedia acknowledge that, pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement, the Agreement will renew for a Renewal Term commencing January 1, 2013 and
expiring December 31, 2013. 

  

	2)	TRX and Expedia hereby agree that the following Statements of Work will terminate at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time on December 31, 2012, unless otherwise terminated
earlier in accordance with their respective terms or extended by mutual written agreement of TRX and Expedia: 

 *


  
 *
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 


  
 1 of 2











 EXPEDIA CONFIDENTIAL 

 


	3)	Section 6.2 of the Statement of Work *, dated February 1, 2009, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


  

	 	6.2	Term. This Statement of Work will remain in effect until the earlier of (a) December 31, 2013, (b) termination of the Agreement, or
(c) termination of this Statement of Work as provided in the Agreement. 

  

	4)	Except as expressly set forth in this Fifth Letter of Amendment, the Agreement and Statements of Work thereunder will remain in full force and effect in accordance with
their respective terms. 

 Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below and returning
a signed copy to me as soon as possible. If you do not agree with any of the foregoing, please contact me as soon as possible so that we can determine how best to proceed. 

 

	
	Yours truly,
	
	Expedia, Inc.
	/s/ Tim Lane
	
	Tim Lane
	Vice President, Global Supply Operations
	12/23/2011


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	TRX, Inc.
	/s/ David D. Cathcart
		
	By:	 	David D. Cathcart


			
	Title:	 	CFO


			
	Date Signed:	 	29 December 2011


			
	
	TRX Germany GMBH
		
	By:	 	David D. Cathcart


			
	Title:	 	Managing Director


			
	Date Signed:	 	29 December 2011


  
 *
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 


  
 2 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO.: 19-14839-AJC 

GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH, INC. 

 Debtor./ 

Chapter 7 

ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR 

AUTHORITY TO FILE DEBTOR’S SCHEDULES 

 THIS CAUSE came before the Court on June 20, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. upon Trustee’s Motion 

for Authority to File Debtor’s Schedules (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 56], and the Court, having 

reviewed the Motion and file, having heard argument from Trustee’s counsel, noting that the 

Debtor was served with the Motion and notice of hearing [ECF Nos. 58 and 60] at the address 

listed on the Debtor’s Voluntary Petition, and based on what was stated on the record, it is 

ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Trustee’s Motion is hereby GRANTED.

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 28, 2019.

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-14839-AJC Doc 62 Filed 06/28/19 Page 1 of 2
2. The Trustee is authorized to file Debtor’s Bankruptcy Schedules and State of 

Financial Affairs to include the Debtor’s ownership of the Real Properties1

, the associated secured 

debt on the Real Properties, and any other relevant information related to the Debtor that the 

Trustee discovers upon further review of the Debtor’s financial affairs. 

# # #

Submitted by: 

John H. Lee, Esq. 

Markowitz, Ringel, Trusty & Hartog, P.A. 

Counsel to Chapter 7 Trustee 

9130 South Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1800 

Miami, FL 33156 

Tel: (305) 670-5000 

Copies to: 

John H. Lee, Esq. 

(Attorney Lee is directed to mail a copy of this Order to all interested parties and to file a 

certificate of service). 

 

1

 Terms not otherwise defined in this Order shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Motion. 

Case 19-14839-AJC Doc 62 Filed 06/28/19 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2000 and the Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to these financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          52,228
<SECURITIES>                                     4,938
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,902
<PP&E>                                          11,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,964
<SALES>                                          6,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,959
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,977)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10417]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------