alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No. 18-16314-LMI

LA CAPITAL DE LA FRUTA I, INC.,

Chapter 7

Debtor.

____________________________________/

DREW M. DILLWORTH AS CHAPTER 7

TRUSTEE,

Plaintiff, Adv. Pro. No.19-01811-LMI

-vsEL NINO PRODUCE, INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

AGREED ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

THIS CAUSE came before the Court without a hearing following the filing of the parties’ 

Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (the “Stipulation”) [ECF# 27]. The Court, having reviewed the

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 3, 2020.

Case 19-01811-LMI Doc 28 Filed 04/03/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Stipulation and the record herein finds that this proceeding should be dismissed forthwith. 

Accordingly, the Court

ORDERS as follows:

1. This Adversary Proceeding is DISMISSED.

2. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

###

Submitted by and copies furnished to: 

James B. Miller, Esq.

Luis Fernandez, Esq.

Case 19-01811-LMI Doc 28 Filed 04/03/20 Page 2 of 2
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: March 25, 2015 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR- 2013 -0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: March 25, 2015 Presentation to a public policy / STEM class at Brookhaven

College . The p resentation discussed the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants as part of the overall Methane Strategy . **SUMMARY** A presentation was made by EPA at a public policy / STEM class at Brookhaven College. The presentation discussed the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants as part of the overall Methane Strategy. The meeting was in Dallas, Texas . **ATTENDEES** Participants: The class meeting was conducted in a large auditorium and there was no

registration process . EPA Participant : Rob Lawrence (Region 6 Energy Policy Advisor)
**Exhibit 10.11**

 

**AMENDMENT TO BONUS PLAN**

 

Great Western Bank, an Iowa banking corporation, and                         (the “Participant”) are parties to a Bonus Plan dated                        . 

 

Due to the adoption of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the parties deem it advisable to amend the Plan as follows: 

 

The last three paragraphs of the Bonus Plan dated as set forth above arehereby deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 

 

In order to qualify for the bonus, you must remain an employee of the Bank during the entire fiscal year and not have announced a resignation prior to the time for payment of any installment. One-third of eachyear’s bonus will be paid as soon as practical after the end of the fiscal year, following receipt of the audited financial statements from independent accountants, but in no event later than two and one-half months after the end of the fiscalyear. One-third will be paid the following June 30, and one-third will be paid on the next subsequent June 30. 

 

In the event of the termination of your employment, voluntarily or involuntarily, with or without cause, or upon announcement of yourresignation, prior to any payment date, then Great Western Bank will be under no obligation to pay any subsequent payments hereunder or under any Former Bonus Plan. However, in the event of termination of your employment due to your death orpermanent disability (as determined in the sole judgment of the Great Western Bank Board of Directors), prior to a payment date, any amounts accrued for fiscal years ending prior to the date of your death or such disability will be paid to you, ifliving, otherwise to a beneficiary designated by you in writing, if any, otherwise to your spouse, if any, otherwise to your estate, when and as payments would otherwise have been payable to you. 

 

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate thesame by signing a copy hereof.
CGFI1 (10/01/16)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 7, 2021

Peter D. Russin

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−24331−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Ralph Levi Sanders Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

SSN: xxx−xx−6171

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT

 The following document was filed on 12/15/2020:

Title of Stricken Document: Ex Parte Motion for Postponement of Mortgage Modification Mediation Scheduled for

December 17, 2020

 The document was not signed as required by Bankruptcy Rule 1008 or 9011, or was not

accompanied by Official Form Declaration Concerning Debtors Schedules as required by Local Rule

1009−1(D)(1)

 It is ORDERED that this document is stricken. Any fees accompanying the document shall not be

refunded. A stricken document resubmitted in compliance with the rules shall be considered as filed on the

date it is resubmitted for filing, not the date the noncomplying document was initially filed, and must be

served in accordance with court rules. If required, an additional fee must also be remitted. If the document

stricken was a notice or motion served pursuant to Local Rules 3007−1(C), 4001−1(C), 6004−1(D),

6007−1(B) or 9013−1(D), the proponent is denied any relief which would have been afforded under the

"negative notice" provisions contained in these rules and the party filer shall not submit any requests for

orders to take any action based upon the filing of this stricken document.

The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order on the party filing this document and on all parties on the service list of the

document being stricken.

# # # 

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 94-1 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
Paula KUNSMAN, Appellant, v. Joel James WALL, Appellee.

No. 4D15-1416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 26, 2018]

Paula Kunsman, Pompano Beach, pro se.

Michael R. Bass of Michael R. Bass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. .

Per Curiam

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3627 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3627

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reauthorize the Overseas 
        Private Investment Corporation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2012

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reauthorize the Overseas 
        Private Investment Corporation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Overseas Private Investment 
Corporation Reauthorization Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. ISSUING AUTHORITY.

    Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``2007'' and inserting ``2015''.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           National preparedness strategy & action plan for potentially hazardous near-Earth objects and planetary defense      

      April 1, 2023    

Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are asteroids and comets that orbit the Sun, but have orbits that can bring them into Earth’s neighborhood—within 30 million miles of Earth’s orbit. Planetary defense is “applied planetary science” to address the NEO impact risks on Earth. 

This National Preparedness Strategy and Action Plan for Near-Earth Objects and Planetary Defense (2023 Planetary Defense Strategy) updates the United States’ first comprehensive Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy and Action Plan, released in 2018. The 2023 Planetary Defense Strategy builds on existing efforts by Federal Departments and Agencies to address the hazard of near-Earth object impacts, includes evaluation of where progress has been made since 2018, and focuses future work on planetary defense across the U.S. government. The 2023 Planetary Defense Strategy maintains and updates the core five goals of the 2018 Strategy and Action Plan, while adding a sixth goal to improve governance and interagency coordination on planetary defense issues across Federal Departments and Agencies for the decade ahead. 

The 2023 Planetary Defense Strategy focuses on six goals: 

• Goal 1: Enhance NEO detection, tracking, and characterization capabilities. 

• Goal 2: Improve NEO modeling, prediction, and information integration. 

• Goal 3: Develop technologies for NEO deflection and disruption missions. 

• Goal 4: Increase international cooperation on NEO preparation. 

• Goal 5: Strengthen and routinely exercise NEO impact emergency procedures and action protocols. 

• Goal 6: Improve U.S. governance of planetary defense through new interagency collaboration.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 115 (Thursday, June 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 31463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20615]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of Viva International, Inc. for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2004, I,  Syed A. Hasan, Chief Executive Officer and I Robert J. Scott Chief Financial Officer of Viva International, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

 
| 1.     | Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viva International, Inc. |

 

Dated: May 4, 2005

 

**VIVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

 

 
| /s/    | *Robert J. Scott*

Robert J. Scott

Chief Financial Officer                 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                        |
|   |                                                                        |
| /s/    | *Syed A. Hasan*

Syed A. Hasan

Chief Executive Officer &

Board member |
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 00-30963

LADDIE McVICKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CV-11)

March 15, 2001

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this employment discrimination lawsuit brought pursuant to

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621

et seq., Laddie McVicker appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Albemarle Corporation (“Albemarle”). 

McVicker was an employee of Albemarle in its Distribution
2

Department, and he had worked for Albemarle and its predecessors in

interest since 1969. In March 1996, Albemarle instituted a

reduction in force (“RIF”) in connection with the sale of its

Olefins and Derivatives business. The Distribution Department was

reorganized and McVicker’s position was eliminated. Two new

positions developed as a result of the reorganization, but McVicker

was not selected for either of these positions because Albemarle

believed that he was not the most suitable candidate for those

positions as he lacked, among other qualifications, a chemical

engineering degree. The two positions were ultimately filled by

employees younger than McVicker. Albemarle moved for summary

judgment arguing that McVicker had failed to establish a prima

facie case of discrimination or, alternatively, that he had failed

to establish that Albemarle’s proffered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for not selecting McVicker, the RIF, was a

pretext for intentional, age-based discrimination.

The district court concluded that although a reasonable fact

finder could find that McVicker established a prima facie case of

age discrimination, McVicker failed to offer proof or create a

genuine issue of material fact as to whether Albemarle’s stated

reasons for terminating McVicker’s employment were pretextual or

that the real reason for his termination was intentional age

discrimination.

We review a district court’s award of summary judgment de

novo, applying the same standards that would have been applicable
3

in the district court. See Sherrod v. American Airlines, Inc.,

132 F.3d 1112, 1119 (5th Cir. 1998). Having conducted such a

review, having reviewed the record of this case, and having

considered the parties’ respective briefing with the benefit of

argument, we conclude that for substantially the same reasons

articulated by the district court in its order, Albemarle is

entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court in favor of Albemarle Corporation is affirmed in all

respects. Albemarle’s request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Rule

38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is denied.

AFFIRMED.
Donald KAUTZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2357

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 19-25012-EPK Doc 16 Filed 12/04/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-25012-EPK Doc 16 Filed 12/04/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-25012-EPK Doc 16 Filed 12/04/19 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           MODIS-informed greenness responsesto daytime land surface temperaturefluctuations and wildfire disturbancesin the Alaskan Yukon River Basin      

      January 1, 2012    

Pronounced climate warming and increased wildfire disturbances are known to modify forest composition and control the evolution of the boreal ecosystem over the Yukon River Basin (YRB) in interior Alaska. In this study, we evaluate the post-fire green-up rate using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) derived from 250 m 7 day eMODIS (an alternative and application-ready type of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data) acquired between 2000 and 2009. Our analyses indicate measureable effects on NDVI values from vegetation type, burn severity, post-fire time, and climatic variables. The NDVI observations from both fire scars and unburned areas across the Alaskan YRB showed a tendency of an earlier start to the growing season (GS); the annual variations in NDVI were significantly correlated to daytime land surface temperature (LST) fluctuations; and the rate of post-fire green-up depended mainly on burn severity and the time of post-fire succession. The higher average NDVI values for the study period in the fire scars than in the unburned areas between 1950 and 2000 suggest that wildfires enhance post-fire greenness due to an increase in post-fire evergreen and deciduous species components

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jennifer Rover

##### Research Geographer

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

jrover@usgs.gov

605-594-2761

## Related Content

#### Jennifer Rover

##### Research Geographer

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

jrover@usgs.gov

605-594-2761

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-33 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-33 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-33 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-33 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10508]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Raul CARRILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-257

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 2, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 213 (Friday, November 3, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 55887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21103]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NM-010-1430-01; NMNM 94904]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; 
New Mexico

Correction

    In notice document 95-26443 appearing on page 54704 in the issue of 
Wednesday, October 25, 1995, make the following correction:
    Under the heading DATES, ``January 23, 1995'' should read ``January 
23, 1996''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 10.2

                   FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made on
the 5th day of October 2004 between  Intermost  Corporation,  a corporation duly
organized,  validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Wyoming (the  "Company"  or  "Intermost")  and Andy  Benjian Lin, an  individual
resident in Shenzhen, China (the "Executive"), based upon the following:

      1.  The  Company  and  the  Executive  executed  that  certain  Employment
Agreement dated March 12, 2004.

      2.  The  Company  and  the  Executive  agree  that  paragraph  6.1  of the
Employment Agreement included a mistake.

      3.  The  Company  and  the  Executive  agree  that  paragraph  6.1  of the
Employment Agreement shall be corrected to read as follows:

      6.1 The Board of Directors may, in its sole and absolute discretion, grant
      to the  Executive  an option to purchase  shares of the  Company's  common
      stock.  If the Board of  Directors  grants such an option,  the  Executive
      shall be entitled to purchase  1,000,000  shares of the  Company's  common
      stock on the date of grant,  and 1,000,000  shares of the Company's common
      stock for each complete year that the Executive  renders service under the
      Agreement. (Collectively, these options shall be referred to herein as the
      "Options".)  The exercise price  ("Option  Price") of the Options shall be
      computed as the average of the closing  price of the common  stock for the
      five trading days prior to the date of grant, as to the initial  1,000,000
      shares,  and the average of the closing  price of the common stock for the
      five trading days  immediately  preceding the last day of the  Executive's
      service year for the remaining Options.

      4. In all  other  respects,  the terms and  conditions  of the  Employment
Agreement shall remain the same.

<PAGE>

      WHEREFORE,  this  Amendment  has been  executed by the parties first named
above.

                              INTERMOST CORPORATION



                              By:/s/ Shim Yang
                                 ---------------------------------



                              /s/ Andy Benjian Lin
                              ------------------------------------
                              Andy Benjian Lin
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 24

- 00085

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23

- 9170

- 431

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### B RITTANY 

### T URNER 

### W HITE



### , Appellant

V



### .

L OUDER WITH 

### C ROWDER



### , LLC , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

The parties have filed a j oint motion to dis miss th is appeal

. H a ving previousl y

abated the appeal , we lift the abatement

, grant the joint motion

, and dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R . App. P. 4 2.1(a) , 43.2(f).

Pursuant to the parties ’ agreement, each party must bear its own costs of

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : June 6, 2024
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0328. STEVE MACK v. THE STATE.

After entering a guilty plea in 2008 to armed robbery, Steve Mack filed a

motion for an out-of-time appeal. The trial court ultimately dismissed the motion, and

Mack filed both this timely application for discretionary appeal and a direct appeal,

which has been docketed as Case No. A22A1296.

Mack was not required to file a discretionary application in order to challenge

the trial court’s dismissal of his motion for an out-of-time appeal. Ordinarily, we will

grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct

appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). In light of Mack’s direct appeal of the trial court’s

order, however, this application is superfluous, and it is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 19, 2022

04/19/2022