alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Natural climate solutions for the United States      

      November 2, 2018    

Limiting climate warming to <2°C requires increased mitigation efforts, including land stewardship, whose potential in the United States is poorly understood. We quantified the potential of natural climate solutions (NCS)—21 conservation, restoration, and improved land management interventions on natural and agricultural lands—to increase carbon storage and avoid greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. We found a maximum potential of 1.2 (0.9 to 1.6) Pg CO2e year−1, the equivalent of 21% of current net annual emissions of the United States. At current carbon market prices (USD 10 per Mg CO2e), 299 Tg CO2e year−1could be achieved. NCS would also provide air and water filtration, flood control, soil health, wildlife habitat, and climate resilience benefits.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kevin D Kroeger, PhD

##### Research Chemist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

kkroeger@usgs.gov

508-457-2270

## Related Content

#### Kevin D Kroeger, PhD

##### Research Chemist

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

kkroeger@usgs.gov

508-457-2270

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - Climate
                  - United States

View All **
John Lester DAVIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0770

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10920]



      

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 182/Wednesday, September 20, 1995/
Corrections

[[Page 48749]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Commission
[A-580-812]


Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors of One Megabit or 
Above From the Republic of Korea; Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review

Correction

    In notice document 95-22501 beginning on page 47149 in the issue of 
Monday, September 11, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 47152, in the first column, in the table, in the second 
column, in the entry corresponding to ``Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd'' 
remove ``(de minimis)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Predicting watershed post-fire sediment yield with the InVEST sediment retention model: Accuracy and uncertainties      

      August 29, 2015    

View Document

Increased sedimentation following wildland fire can negatively impact water supply and water quality. Understanding how changing fire frequency, extent, and location will affect watersheds and the ecosystem services they supply to communities is of great societal importance in the western USA and throughout the world. In this work we assess the utility of the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) Sediment Retention Model to accurately characterize erosion and sedimentation of burned watersheds. InVEST was developed by the Natural Capital Project at Stanford University (Tallis et al., 2014) and is a suite of GIS-based implementations of common process models, engineered for high-end computing to allow the faster simulation of larger landscapes and incorporation into decision-making. The InVEST Sediment Retention Model is based on common soil erosion models (e.g., USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation) and determines which areas of the landscape contribute the greatest sediment loads to a hydrological network and conversely evaluate the ecosystem service of sediment retention on a watershed basis. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy and uncertainties for InVEST predictions of increased sedimentation after fire, using measured postfire sediment yields available for many watersheds throughout the western USA from an existing, published large database. We show that the model can be parameterized in a relatively simple fashion to predict post-fire sediment yield with accuracy. Our ultimate goal is to use the model to accurately predict variability in post-fire sediment yield at a watershed scale as a function of future wildfire conditions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

#### Jason Kreitler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

jkreitler@usgs.gov

208-426-5217

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

#### Jason Kreitler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

jkreitler@usgs.gov

208-426-5217

#### Todd Hawbaker

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

tjhawbaker@usgs.gov

303-236-1371

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Planetary Aeolian landforms: An introduction to the Fifth Planetary Dunes Workshop Special Issue      

      April 11, 2022    

Aeolian landforms are widespread in our solar system. Understanding the exact nature and processes of formation of these features are challenging tasks necessitating a strong collaboration between scientists with different skills and scientific backgrounds. This paper describes the special issue for the 5th International Planetary Dunes Workshop, which includes 15 research papers and three commentaries. Among the 18 papers included in this collection, 16 cover Martian aeolian science and two Titan aeolian science. The papers presented focus on bedform morphology and dynamics via remote sensing data, modelling, analogues studies and laboratory experiments. Here we put the main results of the papers in their appropriate scientific context and discuss potential future lines of research.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
SCAP-11-0000599

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

TIMOTHY VANDEVEER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, AMERICAN SAVINGS HOLDING, INC., Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-11-0000599, CIV. NO. 11-1-0458-03)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that the parties

have entered into a settlement agreement that was approved by

the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, and a Final Judgment was

filed in the circuit court on May 21, 2015, resolving all claims

as to all parties in the case. Accordingly, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-11-0000599 10-NOV-2015 09:37 AM2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal in this case is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, November 10, 2015.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Fort Lauderdale Division

In Re:

DANNY WILDER Case No. 18-22356-BKC-SMG

Debtor. Chapter 7

___________________________________________/

RESPONSE TO ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR DETOR TO FILE ALL MISSING 

SCHEDULES AND DOCUMENTS (DE#88)

COMES NOW, Kenneth A, Welt as the Chapter 7 Trustee in the case captioned above 

and hereby files his response to the Court’s Order Setting Deadline for Debtor to File Missing 

Schedules and Documents and states as follows:

1. In reviewing the case captioned above, I am certain that the Court will agree with the Trustee’s 

evaluation that the debtor is using the bankruptcy system to hinder and delay the secured 

creditors from exercising their rights against the real property of the debtor.

2. This practice, although not unique to this particular debtor, is contrary to the intentions of 

Congress in the drafting of the provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code

3. In the event that the Debtor fails to comply with the Order, the Trustee respectfully 

recommends that the dismissal of this case be with a two (2) year prejudice period. Upon the 

Trustee's investigation, the Debtor has filed three prior bankruptcy cases (Case Nos. 09-26878, 

16-13872 and 18-23101) and failed to file any bankruptcy schedules in the latter two 

cases. The Trustee respectfully suggests that the Debtor's apparent abuse on the bankruptcy 

system warrants such an extended prejudice period.

Date: November 8, 2019 /s/ Kenneth A. Welt

Chapter 7 Trustee

8201 Peters Rd - #1000

Plantation, Fla. 33324

(954_ 368-6682

Case 19-22356-SMG Doc 28 Filed 11/08/19 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00416-CV

In re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BASTROP COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr., filed

a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the district court’s orders granting a motion to

continue a summary-judgment hearing and denying a joint motion for protective order and motion

to quash deposition notices, and they also filed a motion for emergency relief asking this Court to

stay the underlying trial proceedings, including discovery and previously scheduled depositions

of the Relators. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1-.3, .10. In a previous order, we granted the motion for

emergency relief and stayed the underlying trial proceedings pending further action by this Court.

See id. R. 52.10. In addition, we requested that the real parties in interest, Kenneth Levien, Barry

Levien, and Phillip Levien, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Having reviewed the

petition, the response, and the record, we dissolve ourstayand deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Filed: August 26, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

58134

Vol. 60, No. 226

Friday, November 24, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Special Education and

Rehabilitative Services; Proposed

Priorities

Correction

In notice document 95–27508

beginning on page 56192 in the issue of

November 7, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 56192, in the first column, in

the DATES section, in the sixth line,

‘‘December 7, 1996’’ should read

‘‘December 7, 1995’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP96-17-000]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Transition Cost Recovery

Report

Correction

In notice document 95–27179

appearing on page 55712 in the issue of

Thursday, November 2, 1995, the

Docket number should appear as set

forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-24331-BKC-PGH 

 CHAPTER 13 

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. 

__________________________/ 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that true copies of the following documents were served upon all 

interested parties listed on the attached service List, in the manner noted therein, on March 5, 

2020: 

Order Granting Motion to Value and Determine Secured Status of Lien on 

Real Property Held by US Small Business Administration (DE 53). 

Dated: March 5, 2020 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL H. JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Debtor(s) 

3601 W. Commercial Blvd, Ste 31 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

(954) 535-1131 

By:_/s/ Michael H. Johnson_____ 

 Michael H. Johnson 

 Florida Bar No. 0149543 

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN 

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA AND I AM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE

ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATIONS TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT

SET FORTH IN LOCAL RULE 2090-1(A). 

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 56 Filed 03/06/20 Page 1 of 2
SERVICE LIST:

Via CM/ECF:

Office of the US Trustee 

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

Robin R Weiner 

ecf@ch13weiner.com;ecf2@ch13weiner.com 

Gavin N Stewart on behalf of Creditor Specialized Loan Servicing LLC 

bk@stewartlegalgroup.com 

Via US Mail:

Victoria Guerrero, District Director 

U.S. Small Business Administration 

51 SW First Ave., Suite 201 

Miami, FL 33130 

Stephen Kong, COO 

U.S. Small Business Administration 

409 3rd St. S.W., Suite 7000 

Washinton, DC 20416 

Small Business Administration 

801 Tom Martin Dr., Suite 120 

Birmingham, AL 35211 

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 56 Filed 03/06/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 17 Filed 11/22/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 17 Filed 11/22/19 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Simcha Edell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                  November 28, 2007
              /s/
                  Simcha EdellSimcha
                  Edell, Chief Financial Officer
Order filed November 19, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00603-CV

____________

JUVENAL ALVARADO AND FELICIANO ALVARADO, Appellants

V.

ROBERT GROCE DILL, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A ARROW TOWING, 

SAMUEL LEE THOMPSON, BROCK KEITH DION, SOON PHAT, L.P., 

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHARLESTON COURT APARTMENTS, 

YIN SOON CHOI, DERSING, INC. AND MESHA BOYLES AKA MESHA 

KYOMI STEWART, Appellees

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-13757

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) 

and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 46.
The clerk of the 334th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court 

the original of Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 46, on or before November 26, 2012. The Clerk of 

this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it 

to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to 

return the original of Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 46, to the clerk of the 334th District Court.

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 22, 2014

t1015

Order 

Clerk

October 22, 2014

Rehearing No. 603

146819

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146819

COA: 314080

Wayne CC: 94-002089-01-FC

CORTEZ ROLAND DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is DENIED.
Patricia UGARTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CSM RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC d/b/a Fortunatos Italian Market, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7207

ELDER DEFORRORRORA LOCUST,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. BILLY SMITH, Sheriff,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

JAMES B. FRENCH; JIM HUNT, Governor; MACK

JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; LIEUTENANT CANNADY; L. M. PIKE, Chaplin; JOSEPH E. SETZER,

JR.; LENOIR COUNTY; DAL F. WOOTEN, III,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-376-5-BO)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Elder Deforrorrora Locust, Appellant Pro Se. G. Christopher Olson,

WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Elder Deforrorrora Locust appeals from the district court’s

order granting an extension of time for Defendants to file an

answer. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the

order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337

U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order

nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Therefore, we grant W. Billy Smith’s motion to dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Tony M. BROWN, DOC #043545, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW and John Willis, Warden, Respondents.

Case No. 2D17-469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 3

Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 36-3 Filed 12/17/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 36-3 Filed 12/17/19 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED 9/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      808
<ALLOWANCES>                                        49
<INVENTORY>                                      2,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,648
<PP&E>                                           1,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                     577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,606
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              107
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,880
<SALES>                                          1,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,978
<CGS>                                            1,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,469)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,469)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,469)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.29)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,999
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (147,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (147,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>