alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Portable chamber measurements of evapotranspiration at the Amargosa Desert Research Site near Beatty, Nye County, Nevada, 2003-06      

      September 9, 2008    

Portable chamber measurements of evapotranspiration (ET) were made at the U.S. Geological Survey's Amargosa Desert Research Site in southern Nevada to help quantify component- and landscape-scale contributions to ET in an arid environment. Evapotranspiration data were collected approximately every 3 months from 2003 to 2006. Chamber measurements of ET were partitioned into bare-soil evaporation and mixed-species transpiration components. The component-scale ET fluxes from native shrubs typically surpassed those from bare soil by as much as a factor of four. Component-scale ET fluxes were extrapolated to landscape-scale ET using a one-layer, multi-component canopy model. Landscape-scale ET fluxes predominantly were controlled by bare-soil evaporation. Bare soil covered 94 percent of the landscape on average and contributed about 70 percent of the landscape-scale vapor flux. Creosote bush, an evergreen shrub, accounted for about 90 percent of transpiration on average due to its dominance across the landscape (80 percent of the 6 percent shrub cover) and evergreen character.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####                 Upper Midwest Water Science Center - Madison, WI, Office              

1 Gifford Pinchot DriveMadison, WI53726United States

608-828-9901

#### Amanda Garcia

##### Supervisory Hydrologist

Oregon Water Science Center

cgarcia@usgs.gov

####             Brian Andraski (Former Employee)          

####             Keith J Halford (Former Employee)          

## Related Content

####                 Upper Midwest Water Science Center - Madison, WI, Office              

1 Gifford Pinchot DriveMadison, WI53726United States

608-828-9901

#### Amanda Garcia

##### Supervisory Hydrologist

Oregon Water Science Center

cgarcia@usgs.gov

####             Brian Andraski (Former Employee)          

####             Keith J Halford (Former Employee)          

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Nevada Water Science Center          

2730 N. Deer Run RoadSuite 3Carson City, NV89701United States

(775) 887-7600

(775) 887-7629

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - amargosa desert research site
                  - nevada

View All **
S. 3677 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To make a technical correction to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

Section 102(d)(1)(A) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 

1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘residential’’ before ‘‘improved real estate’’ each place that term appears. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
AAM-11-390-E September 7, 2011

Exemption No. 10353 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0761

Ms. Shelli Oliver

Freedom Aviation 310 Hangar Road Lynchburg, VA 24502

Dear Ms. Oliver:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 26, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Freedom Aviation for an exemption from part 120. That exemption, if granted, would allow Freedom Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing

program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Freedom Aviation.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Freedom Aviation an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Freedom Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Freedom Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Freedom Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Savi Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mario Procopio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Savi Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by Savi
Media Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


Date:  November 18, 2005      By: /s/ MARIO PROCOPIO
                              -------------------------------
                              Mario Procopio
                              Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0477. SHELLEY LOVELACE v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER

OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al.

Shelley Lovelace filed this direct appeal from a superior court order reviewing

a decision by the Georgia Department of Labor’s Board of Review. However, under

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), appeals from orders of superior courts reviewing decisions

of state administrative agencies must be initiated by filing an application for

discretionary review. See Dunlap v. City of Atlanta, 272 Ga. 523, 524 (531 SE2d 702)

(2000). Lovelace’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 17, 2019

10/17/2019
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Paleomagnetism of Jurassic radiolarian chert above the Coast Range ophiolite at Stanley Mountain, California, and implications for its paleogeographic origins      

      January 1, 1996    

Upper Jurassic red tuffaceous chert above the Coast Range ophiolite at Stanley Mountain, California (lat 35°N, long 240°E), contains three components of remanent magnetization. The first component (A; removed by ≈100–≈200°C) has a direction near the present-day field for southern California and is probably a recently acquired thermoviscous magnetization. A second component (B; removed between ≈100 and ≈600°C) is identical to that observed by previous workers in samples of underlying pillow basalt and overlying terrigenous sedimentary rocks. This component has constant normal polarity and direction throughout the entire section, although these rocks were deposited during a mixed polarity interval of the geomagnetic field. The B magnetization, therefore, is inferred to be a secondary magnetization acquired during accretion, uplift, or Miocene volcanism prior to regional clockwise rotation. The highest temperature component (C; removed between ≈480 and 680°C) is of dual polarity and is tentatively interpreted as a primary magnetization, although it fails a reversal test possibly due to contamination by B. Separation of the B and C components is best shown by samples with negative-inclination C directions, and a corrected mean direction using only these samples indicates an initial paleolatitude of 32°N ± 8°. Paleobiogeographic models relating radiolarian faunal distribution patterns to paleolatitude have apparently been incorrectly calibrated using the overprint B component. Few other paleomagnetic data have been incorporated in these models, and faunal distribution patterns are poorly known and mostly unquantified. The available data, therefore, do not support formation of the Coast Range ophiolite at Stanley Mountain near the paleoequator or accretion at ≈10°N paleolatitude, as has been previously suggested based on paleomagnetic data, but indicate deposition near expected paleolatitudes for North America (35°N ± 4°) during Late Jurassic time.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california
                  - Stanley Mountain

View All **
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7756

AARON FRENCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN; JOHN ROWLEY; J. LOIBEL; DAN WATSON, Lieutenant; 

WARNER, Lieutenant; WHETSTONE, Officer; SPIKER, Officer; 

RYAN, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-02299-CCB)

Submitted: August 3, 2011 Decided: August 12, 2011 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron French, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Little French, a Maryland state prisoner, 

brought a civil complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) against 

prison staff. The district court dismissed the action, finding 

that French failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. 

French appeals the district court’s orders granting summary 

judgment and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

A prisoner must properly exhaust available 

administrative remedies prior to filing a § 1983 action 

concerning prison conditions. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2006); 

Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (explaining that 

exhaustion requires using every step available and complying 

with relevant procedural requirements). French contended in the 

district court that he could not complete the administrative 

review process because prison staff did not respond to his 

grievances. Maryland Division of Correction Directive 185-002 

(“DCD 185-002”) provides, however, that a prisoner should treat 

a failure to respond within thirty days as a denial and file an 

appeal to the next level. Assuming, as French contended, that 

he received no response to his grievances, under DCD 185-002, 

and based on the dates of his initial grievance and the filing 

of the complaint in this action, he could not have completed the 

grievance process before he filed suit in the district court. 
3

Thus, the district court properly concluded that French failed 

to exhaust his administrative remedies.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment but modify the dismissal to be without 

prejudice to French’s right to refile once exhaustion is 

complete. We also conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion by denying French’s motion for 

reconsideration. See Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLC, 599 

F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing standard for review of 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Origin of the isotopic composition of natural perchlorate: Experimental results for the impact of reaction pathway and initial ClOx reactant      

      July 6, 2021    

Natural perchlorate (ClO4−) exists in many places on Earth, in lunar regolith, meteorites, and on the surface of Mars. Terrestrial natural ClO4− has widely variable Cl and O stable isotopic compositions (δ37Cl, δ18O, Δ17O). The δ18O and Δ17O values of ClO4− from the most hyper-arid locations co-vary. ClO4− from less arid areas has relatively little 17O excess and poor Δ17O-δ18O correlation. ClO4− from the Atacama Desert has unusually low δ37Cl (<−10‰) and exhibits a positive correlation between δ37Cl and δ18O, while the δ37Cl of ClO4− from all other locations varies between −5 and +7‰ with no δ37Cl-δ18O covariation. To evaluate the impact of different precursors (ClOx) and reaction pathways on the isotopic composition of ClO4−, we measured the isotopic composition of ClO4− produced in the laboratory by UV or O3 mediated aqueous oxidation of Cl−, OCl−, ClO2−, and ClO2° as well as O3 mediated oxidation of dry NaCl. ClOx oxidation in aqueous or dry systems enriched in O3 produced ClO4− with Δ17O values that generally increased with the number of O atoms required and included evidence that the site-specific 17O anomaly in O3 was preferentially transferred to ClO4−. Based on the inferred number of O atoms sourced from O3, and known Cl and O reaction pathways, it appears that ClO2° and ClO3* were required intermediates in the production of ClO4− in the O3 experiments. ClOx aqueous oxidation by UV irradiation produced ClO4− with a large range of δ18O values and little or no 17O anomaly. ClO3− was produced to a much greater extent than ClO4− in all experiments except dry oxidation of NaCl by O3. The isotopic composition of ClO3− was distinct from that of ClO4− produced from the same initial reactants. Combined results of O3 and UV mediated reactions largely bracketed the range of natural ClO4− δ18O and Δ17O values as well as δ37Cl values of non-Atacama natural samples, but no conditions produced the low δ37Cl values of Atacama ClO4−. Our results indicate that variation in production mechanisms, possibly combined with isotopically variable precursors, could be responsible for much of the observed isotopic variation in natural ClO4− and ClO3−.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### John Karl Bohlke

##### Emeritus Scientist

Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory (RSIL)

##### Emeritus Scientist

Water Resources Mission Area

jkbohlke@usgs.gov

703-648-6325

## Related Content

#### John Karl Bohlke

##### Emeritus Scientist

Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory (RSIL)

##### Emeritus Scientist

Water Resources Mission Area

jkbohlke@usgs.gov

703-648-6325

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: steam_record <steam_record@erg.com>

Date: 8/16/2010 10:44 AM

Subject: Fw: Request for ICR Extension

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 08/16/2010 10:43 AM

-----

 

 From: "McCabe, Patrick J" <Patrick.McCabe@duke-energy.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Wylie, Robert R" <Robert.Wylie@duke-energy.com>, 

"Craig, Nathan D" 

 <Nathan.Craig@duke-energy.com> 

 

 Date: 08/16/2010 09:50 AM 

 Subject: Request for ICR Extension 

Ms. Jezebele Alicea-Virella,

Duke Energy is requesting a 30-day extension for submittal of the Steam

Electric Effluent Guidelines Information Collection Request (ICR) for

the facilities listed below. Duke Energy has experienced significant

staff turnover during the process of preparing the ICR. We would like

the additional time to complete data collection and allow for a thorough

review to ensure accuracy and completeness.

Facilities Requesting Extension:

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|G. G. Allen |Fayette Energy Facility |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Walter C. Beckjord |R. Gallagher |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Belews Creek |Gibson |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Buck |W. S. Lee |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Cayuga |Marshall |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Cliffside |Miami Fort |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Dan River |Riverbend |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|East Bend |Wabash River |
|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

|Edwardsport |W. H. Zimmer |

|----------------------------------------+----------------------------------------|

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thanks for your assistance,

Pat

Patrick J. McCabe, PE

EHS - Water Management Group

Duke Energy

Phone: (704) 382-7161

Cell: (704) 996-6238

Mail Code: EC13K
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fifth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium 
Battery and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium Battery and 
Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size for the fifth meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 30-December 1, 2011, from 9 
a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium Battery 
and Battery Systems--Small and Medium Size. The agenda will include the 
following:

November 30, 2011

     Introductions and Administrative Remarks.
     Review and approval of summary from the 4th plenary 
meeting.
     Review action items.
     Review SC-225 schedule for Plenary meetings, working group 
meetings, and document preparation.
     Working Group Meeting--Review draft document.
     Review new action items.
     Review agenda for Thursday.

December 1, 2011

     Review of meeting agenda, other actions.
     Verify dates of next plenary and upcoming meeting working 
group meetings.
     Establish Agenda for 6th plenary meeting.
     Working Group Meeting--Review draft document.
     Working Group report, review progress and actions.
     Review all action items.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
Manager, Business Operations Group, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-29266 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```