Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices 19995 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 

2273) the Department of Labor herein 

presents summaries of determinations 

regarding eligibility to apply for trade 

adjustment assistance for workers (TA– 

W) number and alternative trade 

adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA– 

W) number issued during the period of 

April 13 through April 17, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, the 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,097; AdMart Custom Signage, 

Danville, KY: February 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,149; HDM Furniture 

Industries, Drexel Heritage, Plant 7, 

Hickory, NC: February 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,344A; Noranda Aluminum, 

Inc., Rod Mill Department, New 

Madrid, MO: February 20, 2008 

TA–W–65,344; Noranda Aluminum, 

Inc., Metal Products Department, 

New Madrid, MO: February 20, 

2008 

TA–W–65,416; Pilgrim Home and 

Hearth, LLC, Benicia, CA: January 

26, 2008 

TA–W–65,421; Ashley Furniture 

Industries, Inc., Upholstery 

Division, Ripley, MS: February 26, 

2008 

TA–W–64,699; Kimrick, LP, Ft Worth, 

TX: December 11, 2007 

TA–W–64,919; Modine Manufacturing 

Company, North America Division, 

Logansport, IN: September 30, 2008 

TA–W–65,274; Delaco Steel Processing, 

Dearborn, MI: February 13, 2008 

19996 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices 

TA–W–65,560; True Textiles, Inc., 

Grand Rapids, MI: March 10, 2008 

TA–W–65,678; Bihler of America, Inc., 

Staffing Alternatives, Phillipsburg, 

NJ: March 12, 2008 

TA–W–65,229; Royall Company, Inc., 

Specialty Die and Finishing, 

Conover, NC: February 10, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,585; Simpson Door Company, 

Simpson Investment Company, 

McCleary, WA: March 11, 2008 

TA–W–65,694; Indiana Tube 

Corporation, Subsidiary of WHX, 

Evansville, IN: April 12, 2009 

TA–W–65,472; Lincoln Industrial 

Corporation, St. Louis, MO: 

February 26, 2008 

TA–W–64,572; Merrill Corp., Everett, 

MA: December 1, 2007 

TA–W–65,399; HDM Furniture 

Industries, Henredon Plant #9, Mt. 

Airy, NC: February 25, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–64,806; Garvin Industries, 

Guarantee Div., Adamsville, PA: 

January 2, 2008 

TA–W–64,934A; Borgwarner Morse Tec, 

Inc., Powder Metal Operations Div., 

Cortland, NY: January 20, 2007 

TA–W–64,934B; Borgwarner Morse Tec, 

Inc., Transmission Components 

Div., Cortland, NY: January 20, 

2007 

TA–W–64,934; Borgwarner Morse Tec, 

Inc., Engine Timing Components 

Div., Ithaca, NY: January 20, 2007 

TA–W–65,129; Wilson-Hurd 

Manufacturing Co., LCD Division, 

Adecco, Lifestyles, Berlin, WI: 

February 4, 2008 

TA–W–65,475; Mohawk Industries, Inc., 

Flooring Mfg. Div., Oslten Temp, 

Dillon, SC: February 4, 2008 

TA–W–65,489; Evergy, Inc., A Division 

of Tecumseh Products Company, 

Paris, TN: February 17, 2008 

TA–W–65,536; HS Converting, A 

Subsidiary of Hickory Springs Mfg. 

Co., Conover, NC: March 10, 2009 

TA–W–65,688; HB Carbide, A 

Subsidiary of Star Cutter Company, 

Lewiston, MI: March 26, 2008 

TA–W–65,689; Ossineke Industries, A 

Subsidiary of Star Cutter Company, 

Ossineke, MI: March 26, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

TA–W–65,483; Viasystems, Newberry, 

SC: March 3, 2008 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

TA–W–65,650; Aero-Metric, Inc., 

Sheboygan, WI. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,900; Direct Tooling Group, 

Inc., Wayland, MI. 

TA–W–65,125; RMK Industries, Inc., 

Rochester Hills, MI. 

TA–W–65,467; Kenworth Truck 

Company, A Subsidiary of Paccar, 

Inc., Renton, WA. 

TA–W–65,493; Plains Cotton 

Cooperative Association, Lubbock, 

TX. 

TA–W–65,508; Camp-Hill Corporation, 

McKeesport, PA. 

TA–W–65,516; Bauer Industries, Inc., 

Hildebran, NC. 

TA–W–65,526; Monaco Coach 

Corporation, Coburg, OR. 

TA–W–65,540; Trinity Rail Industries 

Plant #19, Longview, TX. 

TA–W–65,453; Tokyo Electron 

Massachusetts, Inc., Beverly, MA. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–65,739; Eos Airlines 

Incorporated, Purchase, NY. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of April 13 through April 17, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Date: April 23, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–9939 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–64,669] 

Century Furniture, LLC, Chair 

Upholstery Campus and Uphosltery 

Division, Hickory, NC; Notice of 

Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On March 13, 2009, the Department 

issued an Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application on 

Reconsideration applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

Register on March 31, 2009 (74 FR 

14594). 

The initial investigation initiated on 

December 15, 2008, resulted in a 

negative determination issued on 

January 12, 2009, was based on the 

finding that the subject firm did not