alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the periods covered in theReport. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                | /s/      D. Michael Kramer                             |         | By:                             | /s/      Vanessa M. Richards         |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|     | D.      Michael Kramer                       |    |                  | Vanessa      M. Richards             |
|          | President      and Chief Executive Officer   |    |                            | Senior      Vice President and Chief |
|          |                                         |    |             | Financial      Officer          |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 42645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30816]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 42645]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 39-95]


Foreign-Trade Zone 15, Kansas City, Missouri; Application for 
Expansion

Correction

    In notice document 95-19822 appearing on page 40820 in the issue of 
Thursday, August 10, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 40820, in the second column, in the fifth full 
paragraph, in the seventh and eighth lines, ``[60 days from date of 
publication].'' should read ``October 10, 1995''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in 
the last line, ``[75 days from date of publication]).'' should read 
``October 24, 1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 13.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Exeter Resource Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Wendell Zerb, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
  Date: May 8, 2015
/s/ Wendell ZerbWendell Zerb, Principal Executive Officer
  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
Allen CRONIER v. ALR PARTNERS L.P.

2016-CT-00521-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 24, 2018 Closed: July 19, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Management implications of habitat selection by whooping cranes (Grus americana) on the Texas coast      

      April 12, 2024    

Effective habitat management for rare and endangered species requires a thorough understanding of their specific habitat requirements. Although machine learning models have been increasingly used in the analyses of habitat use by wildlife, the primary focus of these models has been on generating spatial predictions. In this study, we used machine learning models in combination with simulated management actions to guide planning and inform managers. We used data from 61 whooping cranes (Grus americana) tagged with GPS telemetry collars between 2009 and 2018 near Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in coastal Texas. We included variables based on topography, land use classification, vegetation height, plant phenology, drought, storm surge events, and both wild and prescribed fires. We then built models at multiple scales: population level, home range level, and roosting and daytime within home range level. We simulated responses to the two primary management actions used to enhance whooping crane habitat on Aransas National Wildlife Refuge: prescribed fire and removal of woody vegetation. At the population and home range scales, land use classification variables had the highest importance values, whereas the combined elevation and bathymetry layer was the most important predictor at both roosting and daytime within home range scales. Our findings revealed that the effects of fire, although generally modest, varied spatially. Areas dominated by estuarine wetlands exhibited higher predicted use within the first months after a fire, whereas those dominated by palustrine wetlands were more likely to be avoided in the immediate postfire years. Our simulation of vegetation removal identified the areas on Aransas National Wildlife Refuge where whooping cranes were predicted to benefit the most if vegetation were removed. These techniques can be used by other researchers wanting to examine and predict the effects of potential management actions on target species habitat.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Aaron Pearse, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

apearse@usgs.gov

701-253-5509

## Related Content

#### Aaron Pearse, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

apearse@usgs.gov

701-253-5509

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - texas

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40526]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 201


Digital Audio Recording Devices and Media: Access to and 
Confidentiality of Statements of Account and Verification Audit Filings

Correction

    In rule document 95-12012 beginning on page 25995 in the issue of 
Tuesday, May 16, 1995, make the following correction:

Appendix  [Corrected]

    On page 25999, in the third column, in paragraph (2), in the fourth 
line, ``important'' should read ``importing''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
1 COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Larry Joe Morgan
, Appellant
,

v.
Doctor Talley, and Samuel B. Itie, FNP, In their Individually and Office Capacity
,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 103

- C V

Appeal from the

83 rd District Court

of Pecos County , Texas
(TC# P

- 7867

- 83

- CV )

O R D E R
Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to supplement the record pursuant to
T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.6(d). Appellant and the Attorney General’s Office attended a hearing on May 22, 2018 via telephone conference call with the trial court, and the court reporter filed a transcription of the hearing for purposes of this appeal. Appellant first requests that the record be supplemented with the recording of the telephone conference call between the trial court, Appellant, and the Assistant Attorney General. The appellate record consists of the clerk’s record and, if necessary to the appeal, the
reporter ’s record. T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.1. In Texas, reporter’s records can be created by stenographic recording or electronic recording. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.6(a)(1), (2). When the proceedings are stenographically recorded by the court reporter, as in this case, th e reporter’s record consists of the court reporter’s transcription of so much of the proceedings, and any of the exhibits, that the parties to the appeal designate. T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.6(a)(1). The court reporter submitted a transcription of the hearing in q uestion and certified that it is a true and correct transcription. Consequently, the reporter’s record of the hearing has been filed in accordance with Rule 34.6. Appellant’s request to supplement the record with a recording of the hearing is DENIED.2

C iting Rule 34.6(d), Appellant alternatively requests that we order the court reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing two statements which the trial court judge purportedly made during the hearing on May 22, 2018. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 34. 6(d). According to Appellant, the trial court stated the following during the hearing: (1) “don’t this rule includes where plaintiff must pay a fee before filing another motion included it in your order”; and (2) “I told you how to file your petition”. This request is GRANTED as follows: the court reporter is directed to review her notes of the hearing to determine whether the trial court made either of these statements during the proceedings transcribed by her on May 22, 2018 in the above

- styled and nu mbered cause. If the trial court made the statements, the court reporter is directed to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter’s record within 15 days of the date of this order. If the court’s reporter’s
notes do not reflect that the trial co urt made these statements, the court reporter is directed to file a letter stating same. The letter is due to be filed within 15 days of the date of this order.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of November , 201 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
# L_2004311EN.01001801.xml

| 8.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/18

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1742/2004

of 7 October 2004

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2235/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of the aid for the consumption of fresh milk products in the Canary Islands

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1454/2001 of 28 June 2001 introducing specific measures for certain agricultural products for the Canary Islands and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (Poseican) (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2235/92 (2) provides that the aid for the human consumption of fresh cows’ milk products produced in the Canary Islands shall be paid, subject to the limit of 44 000 tonnes of whole milk, for a period of twelve months. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2235/92 (2) provides that the aid for the human consumption of fresh cows’ milk products produced in the Canary Islands shall be paid, subject to the limit of 44 000 tonnes of whole milk, for a period of twelve months.

| (2) | The latest assessment provided for by the Spanish authorities indicates that the consumption limit of 44 000 tonnes is likely to be exceeded in the near future. Consequently, this limit should be increased to 50 000 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The latest assessment provided for by the Spanish authorities indicates that the consumption limit of 44 000 tonnes is likely to be exceeded in the near future. Consequently, this limit should be increased to 50 000 tonnes.

| (3) | Regulation (EEC) No 2235/92 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EEC) No 2235/92 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 1(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2235/92, ‘44 000 tonnes’ is hereby replaced by ‘50 000 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 21.7.2001, p. 45. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 218, 1.8.1992, p. 105. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1400/98 (OJ L 187, 1.7.1998, p. 54).

2

---
James Benjamin KIRKLAND v. STATE

CR-15-1409

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0172 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MITCHELL LEE JOYCE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening bri ef on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2022

02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0172
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: July 1976      

      January 1, 1976    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Projected water-level declines in the Ogallala aquifer in Lea County, New Mexico      

      January 1, 1984    

View Document

A two-dimensional digital ground-water flow model was constructed of the Ogallala aquifer in Lea County, New Mexico. Simulations of predevelopment steady-state and historical pumping conditions were used to fit the model. Projections of water-level declines were made based on the condition of no additional development and the condition of a 0.44 percent annual increase in irrigation withdrawals to 1990 and a 0.88 percent annual increase in nonirrigation withdrawals to 2020. Based on no additional development, projected maximum water-level declines from 1980 were 31 feet in 2000 and 59 feet in 2020. The amount of recoverable water remaining in the aquifer as simulated by the model was 24.6 million acre-feet in 2000 and 22.4 million acre-feet in 2020, compared to an estimated 28 million acre-feet in 1980, with increased withdrawals, projected maximum declines were 33 feet in 2000 and 67 feet in 2020. As simulated by the model, 24.4 million acre-feet of recoverable water remained in 2000 and 21.8 million acre-feet remained in 2020. The sensitivity of the model to variation in hydraulic conductivity, specific yield, and recharge was tested over their range of uncertainty. Projected water-level declines were most sensitive to specific yield. In response to changes in specific yield, declines varied by as much as 6.2 feet from the standard simulation to 2020 with no additional development. (USGS)

## Citation Information
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60548 Summary Calendar

SHIVA SHARMA Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A97 518 705
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Shiva Sharma petitions this court to review a Notice of Intent to Issue a Final Administrative Removal Order issued by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Notice of Intent charged Sharma with being removable based on prior aggravated felony convictions. Sharma argues that his state convictions for identity theft in the first degree, in violation of N. Y. PENAL L AW § 190.80, do not qualify as aggravated felonies for immigration purposes. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 5, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-60548

2 Respondent contends that this court lacks juri sdiction over the petition for review because it does not seek review of a final order of removal. This court examines questions related to its own jurisdiction de novo. See Balogun v. Ashcroft, 270 F.3d 274, 277 (5th Cir. 2001). By statute, this court has jurisdiction to review only final orders of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a); c f

. Moreira v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 709, 712-14 (5th Cir. 2007). By its very terms, the Notice of Intent from which Sharma seeks review is not a final order ofremoval. Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to review it. Accordingly, the petition for reviewis DISMISSED for lack ofjurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Transaction Management, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2007, I, Susan Schreter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of First Transaction Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    |   | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (2)    |   | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Transaction Management, Inc. |

|   |   | /s/ Susan Schreter                  |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Susan Schreter                                                                                                           |
|   |   | Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer                                                                              |

September 17, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 115 (Thursday, June 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 31484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30615]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**










We
      have
      issued our reports dated September 2, 2005, accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements and schedule for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 and
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Collectors Universe,
      Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2005. We hereby consent to
      the
      incorporation by reference of said reports in Registration Statements No.
      333-34554, No. 333-34556, No. 333-34558, No. 333-85962 and No. 333-121035 of
      Collectors Universe, Inc. and subsidiaries, each filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on Form S-8.
















/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Irvine,
      California


September
      12, 2005
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Modeled future peak streamflows in four coastal Maine rivers      

      June 14, 2013    

View Document

To safely and economically design bridges and culverts, it is necessary to compute the magnitude of peak streamflows that have specified annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs). These peak flows are also needed for effective floodplain management. Annual precipitation and air temperature in the northeastern United States are in general projected to increase during the 21st century (Hayhoe and other, 2007). It is therefore important for engineers and resource managers to understand how peak flows may change in the future. This Fact Sheet, prepared in cooperation with the Maine Department of Transportation, presents a summary of modeled changes in peak flows at four basins in coastal Maine on the basis of projected changes in air temperature and precipitation. The full Scientific Investigations Report (Hodgkins and Dudley, 2013) is available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5080/.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Glenn Hodgkins

##### Research Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

gahodgki@usgs.gov

207-626-6621

#### Robert Dudley

##### Supervisory Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

rwdudley@usgs.gov

207-626-6615

## Related Content

#### Glenn Hodgkins

##### Research Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

gahodgki@usgs.gov

207-626-6621

#### Robert Dudley

##### Supervisory Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

rwdudley@usgs.gov

207-626-6615

### Study Area

### Contact

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - Surface Water
                  - Water
                  -  New England
                  - United States
                  - maine

View All **