alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001096594
<NAME>                        Natural Solutions Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jul-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         146,596
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  918,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    727,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,895,238
<PP&E>                                         103,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,404,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,508,138
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       19,997
<OTHER-SE>                                     (110,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,404,464
<SALES>                                        939,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,315
<CGS>                                          647,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,228,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (19,095)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (307,748)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (307,748)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling of barrier breaching during Hurricanes Sandy and Matthew      

      January 26, 2022    

Physical processes driving barrier island change during storms are important to understand to mitigate coastal hazards and to evaluate conceptual models for barrier evolution. Spatial variations in barrier island topography, landcover characteristics, and nearshore and back-barrier hydrodynamics can yield complex morphological change that requires models of increasing resolution and physical complexity to predict. Using the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) modeling system, we investigated two barrier island breaches that occurred on Fire Island, NY during Hurricane Sandy (2012) and at Matanzas, FL during Hurricane Matthew (2016). The model employed a recently implemented infragravity (IG) wave driver to represent the important effects of IG waves on nearshore water levels and sediment transport. The model simulated breaching and other changes with good skill at both locations, resolving differences in the processes and evolution. The breach simulated at Fire Island was 250 m west of the observed breach, whereas the breach simulated at Matanzas was within 100 m of the observed breach. Implementation of the vegetation module of COAWST to allow three-dimensional drag over dune vegetation at Fire Island improved model skill by decreasing flows across the back-barrier, as opposed to varying bottom roughness that did not positively alter model response. Analysis of breach processes at Matanzas indicated that both far-field and local hydrodynamics influenced breach creation and evolution, including remotely generated waves and surge, but also surge propagation through back-barrier waterways. This work underscores the importance of resolving the complexity of nearshore and back-barrier systems when predicting barrier island change during extreme events.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### John Warner, PhD

##### Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

jcwarner@usgs.gov

508-457-2237

#### Christopher Sherwood, PhD

##### Research Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

csherwood@usgs.gov

508-457-2269

## Related Content

#### John Warner, PhD

##### Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

jcwarner@usgs.gov

508-457-2237

#### Christopher Sherwood, PhD

##### Research Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

csherwood@usgs.gov

508-457-2269

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Fire Island
                  - Florida
                  -  New York

View All **
CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    
 I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Studio Bromont, Inc. for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Studio Bromont, Inc.
    
 By:  /s/  Benoit Laliberte
 Name: Benoit Laliberte
 Title: Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 Date: November 19, 2003
 
 
 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Books 

#           Magnitude Estimates of M7.3-7.8 for the 1811-1812 New Madrid and M7.0 for the 1886 Charleston Earthquakes from a Monte Carlo Analysis of Mean MMIs      

      January 1, 2012    

No abstract available

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2906 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2906

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Propiconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Conrad introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Propiconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROPICONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Propiconazole) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' in the column 1 general rate of 
        duty column and inserting ``5.2%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska, August 1982      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
Willie GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1963

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20101-20102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, June 5, 2009 and Saturday, June 
6, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Friday, June 5, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Saturday, June 6, 
2009 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Time in New York City, NY. The 
public is invited to

[[Page 20102]]

make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. 
Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 
Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 22, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-9883 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
CSAPR Revisions Rule Meeting Log

Date Subject Attendees

1/9/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by Con Edison

William V. Slade (Con Edison)

Christina Ho (Con Edison)

John Catuogno (Con Edison)

Amar Anand (Con Edison)

Peter Garam (Con Edison)

Anthony Guastafeste (Con Edison)

Tim Foxen (Con Edison)

Paul Manning (Con Edison)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

1/9/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by the South Mississippi

Electric Power Association (SMEPA)

Joey Ward (SMEPA)

Nathan Brown (SMEPA)

Gary Rikard (Butler Snow)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

1/9/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by American Electric Power

(AEP)

Scott Weaver (AEP)

Bruce Braine (AEP)

Janet Henry (AEP)

Jeff Novotny (AEP)

John Hendricks (AEP)

John McManus (AEP)

Tim Hostetler (AEP)

Jeb Stenhouse (EPA)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

Kaytrue Ting (EPA)

1/9/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by Kansas City Power & Light

(KCPL)

Paul Ling (KCPL)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

Jeb Stenhouse (EPA)

Stephanie Hogan (EPA)

1/10/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by Southwestern Public

Service Company (SPS)

Frank Prager (Xcel Energy)

Jason Rurup (Xcel Energy)

David Horneck (Xcel Energy)

Nicholas Detmer (Xcel Energy)

Jeb Stenhouse (EPA)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

Ragan Tate (EPA)

1/11/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by Kansas City Board of Public

Utilities

Pat Cassidy (Kansas City BPU)

Stephanie Lee (Kansas City BPU)

Darryl Dorsey (Kansas City BPU)
Dennis Lane (Stinson Morrison

Hecker LLP)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

1/19/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by Con Edison

Amar Anand (Con Edison)

Femi Ogunsola (Con Edison)

Anthony Guastafeste (Con Edison)

Christina Ho (Con Edison)

John Catuogno (Con Edison)

Tim Foxen (Con Edison)

Peter Garam (Con Edison)

William V Slade (Con Edison)

Jeb Stenhouse (EPA)

William Meroney (EPA)

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

1/20/2012 Technical clarifications of comments

submitted by Kansas City Board of Public

Utilities; follow-up on one item from

previous conversation

Jeremy Mark (EPA)

Dennis Lane (Stinson Morrison

Hecker LLP)
### Request for Additional Information re : FPL's proposal in Broward County , Florida Audra Livergood to: Andrew Parks 03/29/2012 02:52 PM Cc: Jocelyn Karazsia History: This message has been forwarded.



### Good afternoon Mr. Parks,

This message is a follow up to my voicemail message. I took a stab at guessing your e-mail address (hopefully I got it right). This e-mail responds to the EPA's Feb. 22, 2012, letter requesting Endangered Species Act section 7 consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service ( N MFS). Your request does not contain sufficient information for us to make a determination as to whether the proposed action may affect listed species under our purview. Therefore, at this stage, I am providing technical assistance and a request for additional information (RAI).

I have attached my RAI along with two documents. The first document is a list of species that may occur in the action area. The second document contains NMFS' recommendations for
p reparing Biological Assessments and Biological Evaluations. If you require additional information, p lease do not hesitate to contact me. We look forward to your response.

Thank you, Audra

-- Audra Livergood Marine Resource Manager N OAA National Marine Fisheries Service SERO Protected Resources Division Fort Lauderdale Field Office 299 East Broward Blvd., Suite 328 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Office (954) 356-7100 Fax (954) 356-7108

For if one link in nature's chain might be lost, another might be lost, until the whole of things will vanish by piecemeal. Thomas Jefferson

FPL RAI_Broward County plant.docx FPL RAI_Broward County plant.docxSouth Atlantic_T&E species list_Jan 10 2012.pd f Atlantic_T&E species list_Jan 2012.pd

BA GUIDE-INITGUIDE COMBO_April 23, 2007.doc
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           MAS/MILS Arc/Info point coverage for the western U.S. (excluding Hawaii)      

      January 1, 1998    

View Document

The U.S. Geological Survey has two international and one regional digital database that contains information on mineral properties. This report describes the conversion of selected data from one of the international databases - MAS/MILS (Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Location System) - into a spatial data product. The MAS/MILS database, obtained from the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) upon its closure, contains over 221,000 records of mineral properties and processing facilities throughout the world. However, the majority of the records in the database are of sites located in the western U.S. This is due to the extensive mineral activity that has occurred in the West, and the work done by mineral professionals in the Western, Alaska, and Intermountain Field Operations Centers of the USBM.

The purpose of this project was to create a spatial coverage of the western U.S. containing mineral resource information. This coverage includes information for the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. For this report, locations from MAS/MILS were converted to a point coverage using a geographic information system (GIS). All work was done using Arc/Info v. 7.0.4. There are 128,441 points in the coverage.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Information Systems
                  - Maps and Mapping
                  - United States
                  - Alaska;Arizona;California;Colorado;Idaho;Montana;Nevada;New Mexico;Oregon;Utah;Washington;Wyoming
                  - Alaska
                  -  Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Nevada
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Utah
                  -  Washington
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Physics-based satellite-derived bathymetry (SDB) using Landsat OLI images      

      February 28, 2024    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeffrey J Danielson

##### CoNED Applications Project Chief

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

daniels@usgs.gov

605-594-6148

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

## Related Content

#### Jeffrey J Danielson

##### CoNED Applications Project Chief

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

daniels@usgs.gov

605-594-6148

#### Curt Storlazzi, PhD

##### Research Geologist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

cstorlazzi@usgs.gov

831-460-7521

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401
J.C.P. v. STATE

CR-15-1367

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
TS-CKHI02



### Attachment #9

Physical and Chemical Properties Da ta on the New Chemical Substance

Molecular Weight DataPage 1 of 49 

# A N A L Y T I C A L R E P O R T

Molecular weight distributi on and low molecular weight

oligomers quantificati on by Gel Permeation

Chromatography (GPC)

Study manager

Technical Coordinator

Test facility

Study completion date

16 November 2009Page 2 of 49 CONTENTS

1. Summary

2. Material and methods

2.1 Test items

2.2 Calibration Standards

2.3 Reagents

2.4 Apparatus

2.5 Analytical Method

2.5.1 Preparation of standard solutions

2.5.2 Sample preparation

2.5.3 GPC conditions

2.5.4 Refractive Index conditions

2.6 Evaluation of results

3. Results and discussion

4. Calibration Curve

5. Chromatograms and GPC distribution tables

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6

5.7

5.8

6. AppendixPage 3 of 49 

### 1. SUMMARYPage 4 of 49 

### 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

2.1 Test itemsPage 5 of 49Page 6 of 49 2.5.3 GPC conditionsPage 7 of 49 

### 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONPage 8 of 49Page 9 of 49 

### 4. CALIBRATION CURVEPage 10 of 49 

### 5. CHROMATOGRAMS AND GPC DISTRIBUTION TABLESPage 11 of 49Page 12 of 49Page 13 of 49Page 14 of 49Page 15 of 49Page 16 of 49Page 17 of 49Page 18 of 49Page 19 of 49Page 20 of 49Page 21 of 49Page 22 of 49Page 23 of 49Page 24 of 49Page 25 of 49Page 26 of 49Page 27 of 49Page 28 of 49Page 29 of 49Page 30 of 49Page 31 of 49Page 32 of 49Page 33 of 49Page 34 of 49Page 35 of 49Page 36 of 49Page 37 of 49Page 38 of 49Page 39 of 49Page 40 of 49Page 41 of 49Page 42 of 49 

### 6. APPENDIXPage 43 of 49Page 44 of 49Page 45 of 49Page 46 of 49Page 47 of 49Page 48 of 49Page 49 of 49
# L_2005317EN.01003601.xml

| 3.12.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 317/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 317/36

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 345 of 20 November 2004
  )

On page 84 in Annex XXIII, fifth indent:

for:

‘... CN code 0602 91 10,’

read:

‘... CN code 0602 90 10,’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10125]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 1995 / 
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 4831]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 91


Inspection and Handling of Livestock for Exportation

CFR Correction

    In title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 1 to 199, 
revised as of January 1, 1994, in Sec. 91.3(a), in the first sentence 
remove the words ``except cattle from Mexico imported into the United 
States in bond for temporary feeding and return to Mexico,''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2826

___________________________

Joseph Anthony Favors

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Samantha Ensz, et al., in their Individual and Official capacities

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: January 3, 2022

Filed: January 7, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Favors, who is civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender

Program (MSOP), brought this § 1983 action asserting retaliation and deliberate

indifference claims against various MSOP officials acting in their official and

individual capacities, the eighth lawsuit Favors filed in the District of Minnesota
against MSOP officials in 2020 and 2021. Favors appeals the district court’s1

 order

granting defendants’ motion to dismiss, to which Favors did not respond, because

defendants are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity and qualified immunity

from the official capacity and individual capacity claims; denying his motion for

leave to amend his complaint, which he filed without a proposed amended pleading;

denying his motion for a harassment restraining order against non-parties; and

declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. 

After careful review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s

Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 2, 2021. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

-2-