alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

           Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Mario J. Gabelli, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K of  Lynch  Interactive
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report) that has  significantly  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to
significantly   affect,   the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2005


/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
--------------------
Mario J. Gabelli
Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Map showing water-level decline in the alluvial aquifer, spring 1964 to spring 1974, upper Black Squirrel Creek basin, Colorado      

      January 1, 1974    

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Upper Black Squirrel Creek basin
                  - Colorado

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Managing individual nests promotes population recovery of a top predator      

      January 9, 2018    

                            - Threatened species are managed using diverse conservation tactics implemented at multiple scales ranging from protecting individuals, to populations, to entire species. Individual protection strives to promote recovery at the population‐ or species‐level, although this is seldom evaluated.
                            - After decades of widespread declines, bald eagles, Haliaeetus leucocephalus, are recovering throughout their range due to legal protection and pesticide bans. However, like other raptors, their recovery remains threatened by human activities. Bald eagle nests are commonly managed using buffer zones to minimize human disturbance, but the benefits of this practice remain unquantified.
                            - Within Voyageurs National Park (VNP), Minnesota, USA, managers have monitored bald eagle populations for over 40 years, and since 1991, have protected at‐risk nests from human disturbance using buffer zones (200 and 400 m radius). We aimed to (1) quantify the recovery of bald eagles in VNP (1973–2016), and (2) provide a first‐ever evaluation of the individual‐ and population‐level effects of managing individual nests. To do so, we developed Bayesian Integrated Population Models combining observations of nest occupancy and reproductive output (metrics commonly collected for raptors) to estimate nest‐level probabilities of occupancy, nest success, and high productivity (producing ≥2 nestlings), as well as population‐level estimates of abundance and growth.
                            - The breeding population of bald eagles at VNP increased steadily from <10 pairs in the late 1970s to 48 pairs by 2016. At the nest‐level, management significantly improved occupancy and success. At the population‐level, management led to 8% and 13% increases in nest success and productivity rates, respectively, resulting in a 37% increase in breeding pair abundance.
                            - Synthesis and applications. There is a clear need to evaluate how management approaches at multiple scales assist in species recovery. Our study uses an Integrated Population Model to reveal the population‐level benefits of a widely used, individual‐based management action (protecting nests using buffer zones) on a recovering raptor.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Wayne E Thogmartin, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

wthogmartin@usgs.gov

608-781-6309

## Related Content

#### Wayne E Thogmartin, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

wthogmartin@usgs.gov

608-781-6309

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center          

2630 Fanta Reed RoadLa Crosse, WI54603United States

(608) 783-6451

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Voyageurs National Park
                  - Minnesota

View All **
EXHIBIT 21.01

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: iSt Services, Inc. and Tracking
Systems Corporation. ABS Nebraska, Inc., an inactive wholly-owned subsidiary,
was dissolved in 2003. iSt Services, Inc. was incorporated on September 25,
2002, in the State of Nebraska and is in good standing. The address of the iSt
Services, Inc. is 5022 South 114th Street, Suite 103, Omaha, Nebraska 68137.
Tracking Systems Corporation was incorporated on February 14, 1991, in the State
of Pennsylvania and is in good standing. The address of Tracking Systems
Corporation is 2404 Park Drive, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.
Grant Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
August 14,
2008                                                                         /s/ B. Grant
Hunter


B. Grant
Hunter


President and Chief Executive
Officer
CNP_Exhibit 10(II)_12.31.2011






Exhibit 10(ll)
 
 
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
 
The following is a summary of compensation paid to the non-employee directors of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) effective April 21, 2011. For additional information regarding the compensation of the non-employee directors, please read the definitive proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2012 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
 
		
	•
	Annual retainer fee of $50,000 for Board membership;




		
	•
	Fee of $2,000 for each Board or Committee meeting attended;




		
	•
	Supplemental annual retainer of $15,000 for serving as a chairman of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee; and




		
	•
	Supplemental annual retainer of $5,000 for serving as a chairman of any other Board committee.




The Chairman receives the compensation payable to other non-employee directors plus supplemental compensation authorized by the board of directors of the Company, as summarized in Exhibit 10(s) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which exhibit is incorporated by reference herein.
 
Stock Grants. Each non-employee director may also receive an annual grant of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Upon the initial nomination to the Board, in addition to the annual grant, a non-employee director may be granted a one-time grant of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock.
 
Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may elect each year to defer all or part of their annual retainer fees, including committee chairman fees, and meeting fees. Directors participating in these plans may elect to receive distributions of their deferred compensation and interest in three ways: (i) an early distribution of either 50% or 100% of their account balance in any year that is at least four years from the year of deferral up to the year in which they reach age 70, (ii) a lump sum distribution payable in the year after they reach age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later, or (iii) 15 annual installments beginning on the first of the month coincident with or next following age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later.
 
Executive Life Insurance Plan. Non-employee directors who were elected to the Board before 2001 participate in CenterPoint Energy’s executive life insurance plan. This plan provides endorsement split-dollar life insurance with a death benefit of $180,000 with coverage continuing after the director’s termination of service at age 65 or later. Directors elected to the Board after 2000 may not participate in this plan.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





**REQUIRED
      BY RULE 13A - 14(B) OR RULE 15D - 14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. 1350**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Inova technology Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
      the period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission  on  the date hereof (the *"Report"* ),
      I,
      Adam Radly, Chief Executive  Officer of  the  Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By: /s/ Adam RadlyAdam RadlyChief Executive Officer*August 13,
              2008*
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3408 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from enforcing regulations pertaining 

to certain battery chargers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2012 

Mr. JOHANNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from enforcing 

regulations pertaining to certain battery chargers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY REGULATIONS REGARD4 ING CERTAIN BATTERY CHARGERS. 

5 The Secretary of Energy may not finalize, implement, 

6 or enforce the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Energy Conserva7 tion Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Battery 

8 Chargers and External Power Supplies’’ (77 Fed. Reg. 

9 18478 (March 27, 2012)), or any substantially similar 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3408 IS

1 regulation, with respect to product class 7 (as described 

2 in the proposed rule). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Carlos HERNANDEZ, Jr. v. STATE

CR-15-1219

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           New surveys of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure suggest melt pockets and target-structure effect      

      January 1, 2005    

We present high-resolution gravity and magnetic field survey results over the 85-km-diameter Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Whereas a continuous melt sheet is anticipated at a crater this size, shallow-source magnetic field anomalies of ???100 nT instead suggest that impact melt pooled in kilometer-scaled pockets surrounding the base of a central peak. A central anomaly of ???300 nT may represent additional melt or rock that underwent shock-induced remagnetization. Models predict that the total volume of the melt ranges from ???0.4 to 10 km3, a quantity that is several orders of magnitude smaller than expected for an impact structure this size. However, this volume is within predictions given a transient crater of diameter of 20-40 km for a target covered with water and sedimentary deposits such that melt fragments were widely dispersed at the time of impact. Gravity data delineate a gently sloping inner basin and a central peak via a contrast between crystalline and sedimentary rock. Both features are ovoid, oriented parallel to larger preimpact basement structures. Conceptual models suggest how lateral differences in rock strength due to these preimpact structures helped to shape the crater's morphology during transient-crater modification. ?? 2005 Geological Society of America.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Anjana K Shah

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ashah@usgs.gov

303-236-1218

## Related Content

#### Anjana K Shah

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ashah@usgs.gov

303-236-1218

### Contacts

#### Anjana K Shah

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ashah@usgs.gov

303-236-1218
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO.: 19-18585-MAM 

MERIDIAN MARINA & YACHT CLUB Chapter 11 

OF PALM CITY, LLC 

Debtor. 

______________________________/ 

BALLOT AND DEADLINE FOR FILING BALLOT ACCEPTING OR REJECTING PLAN

TO HAVE YOUR VOTE COUNT YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS BALLOT BY THE 

DEADLINE INDICATED BELOW [AS SET PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 3018-1(B)]

The plan filed by Meridian Marina & Yacht Club of Palm City, LLC on July 27, 2020 can be confirmed by 

the court and thereby made binding on you if it is accepted by the holders of two-thirds in amount and more 

than one-half in number of claims in each class and the holders of two-thirds in amount of equity security 

interests in each class voting on the plan. In the event the requisite acceptances are not obtained, the court 

may nevertheless confirm the plan if the court finds that the plan accords fair and equitable treatment to the 

class rejecting it. 

This ballot is for creditor (insert name) Zimmer Construction Consultants, P.A. for the following type of claim 

placed in the indicated class in the indicated amount:

TYPE OF CLAIM CLASS IN PLAN AMOUNT OF CLAIM

General Secured

 $ 

 General Unsecured

7

 $14,229.96

Bond Holder

Amount of Bond/debenture $ 

Equity Security Holder Number of Shares of Stock 

The undersigned [Check One Box] Accepts  Rejects 

the plan for reorganization of the above-named debtor. 

Signed: /s/ Richard Zimmer

Print Name: Zimmer Construction Consultants, P.A.

Address: 129 NW 13th Street, Suite 20, Boca Raton, FL 33432

Phone: 561.391.6917

Date: September 8, 2020

FILE THIS BALLOT ON OR BEFORE September 8, 2020

with: Clerk of Bankruptcy Court 

 301 N. Miami Ave., Room 150, Miami, FL 33128

 299 E. Broward Blvd., Room 112, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

 1515 North Flagler Drive, Room 801, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

If you have more than one type of claim against this debtor, separate ballots must be filed 

and you should receive a ballot for each type of claim eligible to vote. Contact the plan 

proponent regarding incorrect or insufficient ballot(s).

LF-33 (rev. 10/10/14) 

Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 197 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 5
 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Pengrowth Energy Trust (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report;(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of
directors (and persons performing the equivalent function):




---



##### 



(a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date:  March 29, 2006
    By:
    /s/  Christopher G. WebsterChristopher G. WebsterChief Financial Officer
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 49 Filed 02/08/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 49 Filed 02/08/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended  June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
 
 In connection with the  Report, I, J. Ladd Greeno, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 
 
 Dated:  January 6, 2012                                                                            /s/  J Ladd Greeno______________
 J. Ladd Greeno
 Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)