alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: SONIA VALES Case No: 19-25851-AJC 

 Chapter 13 

 Debtor / 

DEBTOR’S MOTION TO MODIFY CHAPTER 13 PLAN 

Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1329 of the Bankruptcy Code, Debtor, SONIA VALES, by and 

through undersigned counsel, moves the Court to modify her confirmed Chapter 13 plan and as 

grounds therefore states: 

1. On May 6, 2020, Debtor’s Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan was confirmed (ECF 

#63). 

2. Since the time of the confirmed Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan, secured creditor, 

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of the LB Igloo Series IV Trust, filed an 

Amended Notice of Mortgage Payment Change on September 8, 2021 (ECF #78)—which amended 

its Notice of Mortgage Payment changed filed on May 26, 2021 (ECF #74)-- indicating the 

mortgage payment would increase to $241.71 per month beginning July 1, 2021. 

3. Also, since the time the Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan was confirmed, Debtor 

has experienced financial hardships which caused her to fall behind on Plan payments. 

4. The Debtor failed to stay current under the confirmed Plan and is now asking the 

Court to allow the First Modified Plan (which has been filed contemporaneously with this Motion) 

to pay the above-mentioned secured creditor the correct monthly payment pursuant to its change 

notice, and to cure both the pre-petition arrearage and the post-confirmation delinquency during the 

modified plan term. 

5. Attached to this motion as Exhibit A is the modification ledger. 

Case 19-25851-PGH Doc 80 Filed 04/28/22 Page 1 of 3
 Respectfully submitted, 

LEGAL SERVICES OF GREATER MIAMI, INC. 

 By /s/ Mandy L. Mills 

 Mandy L. Mills 

 Florida Bar No. 41654 

 Attorney for Debtor 

 4343 W. Flagler Street, Ste. 100 

 Miami, FL 33134 

 Tel & Fax: (305) 438-2437 

 Primary Email: MMills@legalservicesmiami.org 

 Secondary Email: SFreire@legalservicesmiami.org 

Case 19-25851-PGH Doc 80 Filed 04/28/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-25851-PGH Doc 80 Filed 04/28/22 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,207
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Matthew OREFICE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2036

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ivany Mining Inc. for the quarter ended      December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Ivany Mining      Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |  /s/ Derek Ivany                            |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Derek      Ivany                           |
|  Title: |  Principal      Executive Officer, Director |
|  Date:  |  February 20,      2009                     |

|  By:    |  /s/      Victor Cantore                    |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Victor      Cantore                        |
|  Title: |  Principal      Financial Officer, Director |
|  Date:  |  February 20,      2009                     |
J.G., the Mother, Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2747

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.26


 


Escalade, Incorporated


Schedule of Director Compensation


 


Each independent director of Escalade, Incorporated
currently is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $25,000. Each member of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive
an additional annual fee of $5,000 except for the Audit Committee Chairman who is entitled to receive $15,000. Each member of the
Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $3,000 except for the Compensation Committee Chairman
who is entitled to receive $10,000. Members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee receive additional fees of $1,000
per committee meeting attended in excess of six and four meetings respectively. Mr. Robert Griffin, the Chairman of the Board,
is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $88,889. All independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin are entitled to receive
an additional fee of $1,000 per board meeting attended in excess of eight meetings per year. In 2009, and continuing through 2010,
the independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin have all volunteered to take a 10% reduction in all fees in which they are entitled
to receive. Beginning with the first quarterly payment for 2011, the 10% reduction in fees was eliminated and payment resumed at
the full scheduled amount. In 2011, each of the independent directors and Mr. R. Griffin received an annual stock option award
of 7,500 shares with a one year vesting.


 


Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated
2007 Incentive Plan, directors can elect to receive some or all of the fees earned in shares of the Company’s common stock
or in the form of RSU’s which vest after one year. In 2011, there were 26,965 shares of common stock issued pursuant to the
plan. In 2011, directors R. Griffin and White opted to receive 100% of the fees they were entitled to in the form of common stock.
Director Baalmann received a combination of cash and stock. Directors Williams and Savitsky received their fees in cash.


 


Directors Keller and Patrick Griffin are full-time
employees of the Company and receive no board fees in connection with their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.
MEMORANDUM TO THE FILE 

Subject: Mendocino County PM2.5 data and intended designation for the 2012 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS 

From: Gwen Yoshimura 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

Date: July 25, 2014

In its recommendation letter dated November 25, 2013, California recommended that EPA 

designate Mendocino County as “unclassifiable/attainment.” In Mendocino County, air quality is 

managed by the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District (Mendocino County 

AQMD). Currently, Mendocino County AQMD operates two PM2.5 monitors within the county: 

Ukiah-Library (AQS ID 06-045-0006) and Willits Justice Center (AQS ID 06-045-2002). 2013 

annual PM2.5 design values for these two sites were 6.7 μg/m3 and 8.8 μg/m3, respectively. 

However, these data do not meet data completeness requirements of Part 50 Appendix N for the 

annual PM2.5 standard. Specifically, the Ukiah-Library site has three quarters of complete data in 

2012 and one quarter of complete data in 2013. The Willits Justice Center also has only one 

quarter of complete data in 2013. As a result, the 2013 annual design value from these monitors 

should not be used for purposes of determining attainment or nonattainment with the annual 

NAAQS. 

While no valid 2013 design value exist, the Willits Justice Center has a valid 2012 design value. 

As shown in the attached AQS Design Value Report pulled July 23, 2014, this site meets data 

completeness for all twelve quarters, 2010-2012. Its 2012 annual design value is 8.2 μg/m3. 

Annual PM2.5 design values for these two sites, 2001-2013, are shown in the chart below (data 

from attached AQS Design Value Report, produced on July 23, 2014). Willits Justice Center did 

not start collecting data until September 2009; Ukiah-Library presents a longer trend. Over these 

years, its design values range from 5.9 μg/m3 to a high of 8.7 μg/m3

. 

Given the valid 2012 annual design value of 8.2 μg/m3

, and the trend showing low annual design 

values, we intend to designate Mendocino County unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3666 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3666

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
      To amend the Animal Welfare Act to modify the definition of 
                             ``exhibitor''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ANIMAL WELFARE.
    Section 2(h) of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2132(h)) is 
amended by adding ``an owner of a common, domesticated household pet 
who derives less than a substantial portion of income from a nonprimary 
source (as determined by the Secretary) for exhibiting an animal that 
exclusively resides at the residence of the pet owner,'' after 
``stores,''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Occurrence of a predicted earthquake on the San Andreas fault      

      January 1, 1987    

In May 1985 we predicted1 that an earthquake would occur on the San Andreas fault near Stone Canyon, California within a year. The prediction was based on the observation of seismic quiescence-defined as a significant decrease in the average occurrence rate of earthquakes within the source volume of the future mainshock. A mainshock of magnitude ML = 4.6 occurred on 31 May 1986, rupturing exactly the specified segment of the fault. This is the first successful prediction of an earthquake along the San Andreas fault, and the probability to have come true by chance is <5%. Although the prediction addressed only a small main-shock, its success was significant because the location, size and occurrence time were correctly specified for an earthquake in a populated area. Larger earthquakes will undoubtedly be successfully predicted by the same method in the future, but the major segments of the San Andreas fault near San Francisco and Los Angeles have such a low-background seismicity rate that the method will probably not be applicable there. ?? 1987 Nature Publishing Group.

## Citation Information
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2      

      August 12, 2020    

Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) is increasing, which increases leaf‐scale photosynthesis and intrinsic water‐use efficiency. These direct responses have the potential to increase plant growth, vegetation biomass, and soil organic matter; transferring carbon from the atmosphere into terrestrial ecosystems (a carbon sink). A substantial global terrestrial carbon sink would slow the rate of [CO2] increase and thus climate change. However, ecosystem CO2 responses are complex or confounded by concurrent changes in multiple agents of global change and evidence for a [CO2]‐driven terrestrial carbon sink can appear contradictory. Here we synthesize theory and broad, multidisciplinary evidence for the effects of increasing [CO2] (iCO2) on the global terrestrial carbon sink. Evidence suggests a substantial increase in global photosynthesis since pre‐industrial times. Established theory, supported by experiments, indicates that iCO2 is likely responsible for about half of the increase. Global carbon budgeting, atmospheric data, and forest inventories indicate a historical carbon sink, and these apparent iCO2 responses are high in comparison to experiments and predictions from theory. Plant mortality and soil carbon iCO2 responses are highly uncertain. In conclusion, a range of evidence supports a positive terrestrial carbon sink in response to iCO2, albeit with uncertain magnitude and strong suggestion of a role for additional agents of global change.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Phillip  van Mantgem

##### Research Ecologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

pvanmantgem@usgs.gov

707-825-5189

## Related Content

#### Phillip  van Mantgem

##### Research Ecologist

Western Ecological Research Center (WERC)

pvanmantgem@usgs.gov

707-825-5189

### Contact

####               Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters          

3020 State University DriveModoc Hall, Room 4004Sacramento, CA95819United States

(916) 278-9485

(916) 278-9475
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4203

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RENE CECILIO WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-96-181)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duncan R. St. Clair, III, ST. CLAIR & JOHNSON, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Fernando

Groene, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rene Cecilio Wilson pled guilty to a one-count indictment

charging him with illegal re-entry into the United States after

deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (West Supp. 1997), and was sentenced

to a term of 63 months imprisonment. He seeks to appeal his sentence, alleging that the district court erred in determining that

he previously had been deported after being convicted of an aggravated felony and enhancing his sentence accordingly. See United

States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, § 2L1.2(b)(2)

(Nov. 1996). We find that Wilson waived his appeal rights and

therefore dismiss the appeal.

In his plea agreement, Wilson waived the right to appeal a

sentence within the statutory maximum or the manner in which the

sentence was determined. This provision of the agreement was

brought to his attention by the district court during the plea

colloquy and Wilson stated that he understood the waiver and

affirmed his intention to waive his appeal rights. A defendant may

waive the right to appeal if the waiver is knowing and intelligent.

See United States v. Broughton-Jones, 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir.

1995). We find that Wilson's waiver was knowing and voluntary and

effectively bars review of his challenge to the district court's

application of the sentencing guidelines in his case.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-100223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




      CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Craig Crawford, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1)               The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
                  30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies
                  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)               The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
                  financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Registrant.



Date:        August 18, 2003

/s/ CRAIG CRAWFORD
-------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32


                           INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Investment Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, David Ward, President
and Chief Executive Officer, and Robert Hemmerling, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated December 18, 2003                     /s/David Ward
                                            ----------------------------
                                            David Ward,
                                            President, C.E.O. and C.F.O.


                                            /s/Robert Hemmerling
                                            --------------------
                                            Robert Hemmerling,
                                            C.F.O. and Secretary
# C_2004193EN.01000501.xml

| 29.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3433 — HELLA/BEHR/PLASTIC OMNIUM/JV)

(2004/C 193/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3433. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3433. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
Earl Allen POTEAT, III, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie Anne POTEAT, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0621

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Antwon JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2369

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.