alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Regional flood limits of lower Yahara River, Lake Waubesa and south, in Dane County, Wisconsin      

      January 1, 1976    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

The purpose of this report is to provide information on the extent , depth, and frequency of flooding of the lower Yahara River in Dane County, Wis.

The report contains discharge-frequency data for flood peaks, flood–frequency profiles, and the regional flood– (100-year flood) inundation limits for the lower Yahara River. The study reach is in southern Dane County extending from part of the shoreline of Lake Waubesa downstream through Lake Kegonsa to the Dane-Rock County line. Specifically the parts of the shoreline of Lake Waubesa included are those in and south of section 8, T. 6 N., R. 10 E. on the west shore and the south half of section 3, , T. 7 N., R. 10 E. on the east shore. (See figure 2.) The reach is 21 river miles (31 km) long.

The Wisconsin Legislature has enacted flood–plain–Zoning legislation (1965) to encourage economic use of flood plains and to minimize flood losses. This act gave counties, cities, and villages the responsibility of enacting, administering, and enforcing reasonable and effective flood-plain regulations.

This report is a sequel to earlier reports by Lawrence and Holmstrom (1971) and Holmstrom and Lawrence (1971). The earlier reports provided much of the same information, but the scale of the maps defining limits of flooding was much smaller. This report , using Orthophotographs at a scale of 1 in - 100 ft., provides greater detail.

The report is based on conditions existing in 1971. All elevations are referenced to mean sea level, datum of 1929. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Lake Waubesa
                  -  Yahara River
                  - wisconsin

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Point sources of emerging contaminants along the Colorado River Basin: Source water for the arid Southwestern United States      

      June 14, 2012    

Emerging contaminants (ECs) (e.g., pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, personal care products) have been detected in waters across the United States. The objective of this study was to evaluate point sources of ECs along the Colorado River, from the headwaters in Colorado to the Gulf of California. At selected locations in the Colorado River Basin (sites in Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and California), waste stream tributaries and receiving surface waters were sampled using either grab sampling or polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS). The grab samples were extracted using solid-phase cartridge extraction (SPE), and the POCIS sorbents were transferred into empty SPEs and eluted with methanol. All extracts were prepared for, and analyzed by, liquid chromatography–electrospray-ion trap mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-ITMS). Log DOW values were calculated for all ECs in the study and compared to the empirical data collected. POCIS extracts were screened for the presence of estrogenic chemicals using the yeast estrogen screen (YES) assay. Extracts from the 2008 POCIS deployment in the Las Vegas Wash showed the second highest estrogenicity response. In the grab samples, azithromycin (an antibiotic) was detected in all but one urban waste stream, with concentrations ranging from 30 ng/L to 2800 ng/L. Concentration levels of azithromycin, methamphetamine and pseudoephedrine showed temporal variation from the Tucson WWTP. Those ECs that were detected in the main surface water channels (those that are diverted for urban use and irrigation along the Colorado River) were in the region of the limit-of-detection (e.g., 10 ng/L), but most were below detection limits.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Columbia Environmental Research Center          

4200 New Haven RoadColumbia, MO65201-8709United States

573-875-5399 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona;California;Colorado;Nevada;New Mexico;Utah
                  - Arizona
                  - california
                  - Colorado
                  - nevada
                  - new mexico
                  - Utah

View All **
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 

THE FIFTH THIRD BANCORP MASTER 
 PROFIT SHARING PLAN 
 (as amended and restated effective as of
September 20, 2010) 
 Pursuant to the reserved power of amendment contained in Section 12.1 of The Fifth Third Bancorp
Master Profit Sharing Plan (as amended and restated effective as of September 20, 2010) (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended effective September 20, 2010 by changing Section 3.4(a) of the Plan to read as follows: 

(a) Ineligible Class of Employees. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article 3 or in Article 4,
during the time that an Employee falls within one or more of the following classes of Employees, he shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan, or to make or receive allocations of contributions or forfeitures under the Plan: 

(1) a nonresident alien who is not paid through the Employer’s primary United States payroll system and who receives
no earned income from the Employer which constitutes United States source income, or who does receive such income if all of such income is exempt from United States income tax under an applicable income tax convention; or 

(2) an Employee who is not paid through the Employer’s primary United States payroll system and whose position is
located primarily (as determined by the Employer) outside the United States. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Fifth
Third Bank has caused this Amendment to be adopted as of this 12th day of May, 2011. 
  

			
	FIFTH THIRD BANK
		
	BY:	 	/s/ Paul L. Reynolds
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                       AutoNation Financial Services Corp.

     The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of AutoNation Financial Services
Corp. (the "Servicer"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1999 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise
modified from time to time, the "Sale and Servicing Agreement"), by and among
ANRC Auto Owner Trust 1999-A, AutoNation Receivables Corporation, the Servicer
and The Chase Manhattan Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as
Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:

     a. A review of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2002 through
     December 31, 2002 and of its performance of its obligations under the "Sale
     and Servicing Agreement" was made under my supervision; and

     b. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,

     (A) the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the "Sale and
     Servicing Agreement" throughout the period covered by this certificate

     and (B) that no default under this Agreement has occurred and is
     continuing.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
     13th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ David M. Jett
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: David M. Jett
                                        Title: Vice President - Finance, ANFS
Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 90 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 90 Filed 10/30/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 90 Filed 10/30/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 90 Filed 10/30/20 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re: Case No.: 19-26193-LMI

Jazmina Davila,

Debtor(s). Chapter 13

____________________________/

AGREED ORDER SUBSTITUTING COUNSEL FOR DEBTOR

THIS CAUSE having come upon this Court Ex-Parte upon the Agreed 

Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel For Debtor(s) and the parties having agreed and 

the Court being fully advised in the premises it is thereupon:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. That JOSE A. BLANCO be and the same is hereby substituted as counsel of 

record for Debtor(s), Jazmina Davila, and further that ROBERT SANCHEZ 

be and the same is withdrawn as counsel of record for Debtor(s) herein and 

relieved of further responsibility in connection herewith.

1. There are no further attorney’s fees due to ROBERT SANCHEZ, Esq.

2. The balance of attorney’s fees and costs in the Plan and any earned but unpaid 

fees are to be paid to Debtor’s attorney, Jose A. Blanco. However, no fees are 

allowed above the safe harbor limit unless an Order approving of such fees 

has been entered. 

# # #

This Order prepared by:

Jose A. Blanco, Esquire

355 West 49 Street,

Hialeah, FL 33012

-Attorney Jose A. Blanco is hereby directed to serve a copy of this order upon all interested parties.

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 24, 2021.

Case 19-26193-LMI Doc 58 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1
Andrew MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 14, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 00-30963

LADDIE McVICKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ALBEMARLE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CV-11)

March 15, 2001

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this employment discrimination lawsuit brought pursuant to

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621

et seq.

, Laddie McVicker appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Albemarle Corporation (“Albemarle”).

McVicker was an emplo yee of Albemarle in its Distribution2

Department, and he had worked for Albemarle and its predecessors in

interest since 1969. In March 1996, Albemarle instituted a

reduction in force (“RIF”) in connection with the sale of its

Olefins and Derivatives business. The Distribution Department was

reorganized and McVicker’s position was eli minated. Two new

positions developed as a result of the reorganization, but McVicker

was not selected for either of these positions because Albe marle

believed that he was not the most suitable candidate for those

p ositions as he lacked, among other qualifications, a chemica l

engineering degree. The two positions were ultimately filled by

employees younger than McVicker. Albemarle moved for summary

judgment arguing that McVicker had failed to establish a prima

facie case of discrimination or, alternatively, that he had failed

to establish that Albemarle’s proffered legitimate, nondiscriminat ory reason for not selecting McVicker, the RIF, was a

pretext for intentional, age-based discrimination.

The district court concluded that although a reasonable fact

finder could find that McVicker established a prima facie case of

age discrimination, McVicker failed to offer proof or create a

genuine issue of material fact as to whether Albemarle’s stated

reasons for terminating McVicker’s employment were pretextual or

that the real reason for his termination was intentional age

discrimination.

We review a district court’s award of summary judgment de

novo, applying the same standards that would have been applicable3

in the district court. See Sherrod v. American Airlines, Inc.

,

132 F.3d 1112, 1119 ( 5th Cir. 1998). Having conducted such a

review, having reviewed the record of this case, and having

considered the parti es’ respective briefing with the benefit of

argument, we conclude that for substantially the same reasons

articulated by the district court in its order, Albemarle is

entitled to summary jud gment. Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court in favor of Albemarle Corporation is affirmed in all

respects. Albemarle’s request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Rule

38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is denied.

AFFIRMED

.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10816]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Part 19


Duty-Free Stores

CFR Correction

    In title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 1 to 140, 
revised as of July 1, 1995, Sec. 19.5 appearing on page 235 should be 
removed and reserved.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re Margith Maceda Gonzalez Case No. 20-10173

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 1,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 1,000.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. $ 335.00 of the filing fee has been paid.

3. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

5.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

6. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with secured creditors to reduce to market value; exemption planning; preparation and filing of

reaffirmation agreements and applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions pursuant to 11 USC

522(f)(2)(A) for avoidance of liens on household goods.

7. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

Representation of the debtors in any dischargeability actions, judicial lien avoidances, relief from stay actions or

any other adversary proceeding.

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

January 21, 2020 /s/ Haven Del Pino, Esq.

Date Haven Del Pino, Esq. 88606

Signature of Attorney

Del Pino Law Firm, LLC

900 West 49th Street

Suite 422

Hialeah, FL 33012

305-362-6277 Fax: 888-327-2399

haven@delpinolaw.com

Name of law firm

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2019 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 20-10173-RAM Doc 8-1 Filed 01/21/20 Page 1 of 1
# L_2005185EN.01003001.xml

| 16.7.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 185/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 185/30

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 July 2005

appointing an alternate United Kingdom member of the Committee of the Regions

(2005/507/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the United Kingdom Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC (1) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC (1) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period 26 January 2002 to 25 January 2006.

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr William SPEECHLEY, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr William SPEECHLEY,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr David PARSONS, Councillor, Leicestershire County Council is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr William SPEECHLEY for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2005.

For the Council

The President

G. BROWN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

1

---
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:I am a Social Worker at a dialysis facility in Evansville, IN and am writing in regard 
to CMS-2232-P.  Dialysis patients generally receive treatments three times per 
week and is ongoing and life sustaining.  Dialysis patients have a host of 
challenges to address in addition to the physical part that they face on a daily 
basis.  One of their significant challenges is getting to and from treatment, three 
times per week.  For those patients that do qualify for Medicaid benefits, they are 
able to utulize transportation that assists with this.  Many times patients are 
wheelchair bound or have mobility issues and transportation is not a simple 
matter.  I am writing in support of Medicaid continuing to offer transportation, on an 
on-going basis for those individuals who meet guidelines.  In doing so, this would 
allow a patient to receive all of their recommended treatments and hopefully 
prevent an increase in hospitalizations that result in missed dialysis treatments. 

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No: 19-26821-JKO

Chapter 13

KATRINA LYNN VALENTINO

Debtor /

ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO PAY 

INTEREST ON PROJECTED PRIORITY CLAIM, NOT YET FILED BY THE 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY – INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DE# 10

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the consent calendar on January 6, 2020 at 1:00 p.m.

on the Debtor’s Motion to Pay Interest on Priority Claim to be Filed by the Department of the 

Treasury – Internal Revenue Service, (DE #10; the “Motion”). The Court, having reviewed the 

Motion, with no one having appeared in opposition, finds that good cause exists to grant the 

Motion. It is so ORDERED:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 14, 2020.

John K. Olson, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 18 Filed 01/14/20 Page 1 of 2
2. The Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), shall timely file a 

claim by the governmental claims bar date of June 15, 2020, and shall receive 5% interest

of the projected liability for the tax year of 2018 in the amount of $ 473.07 on the unsecured 

priority amount of $ 3576.33 for a total of $ 4049.40 to be applied towards the Debtor’s

2018 tax period. 

3. The Debtor has an undetermined balance due for the secured and general unsecured debt 

due and owing to the IRS as no claim has been filed to date.

###

Submitted by: 

Chad Van Horn, Esq.

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

330 N Andrews Ave. Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 765-3166

Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

Chad Van Horn, Esq. is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested 

parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.

Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 18 Filed 01/14/20 Page 2 of 2
David R. LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 2018

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, May and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 92 (Friday, May 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 21506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X96-10510]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in biological Sciences (# 1754).
    Date and Time: May 30-31, 1996; 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person:  Carol Colby, Program Officer for Behavioral 
Neuroscience in the Division of Integrative Biology and 
Neuroscience, Room 685, National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1416.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Collaborative Research in 
Neuroscience, Computer and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering 
(CRI) proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 5522b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 6, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR. Doc. 96-11666 Filed 5-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M