alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1)   | the                Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of United American Corporation                for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                for                the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United                American Corporation. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                Benoit                Laliberté                                                  |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Name:     |  Benoit                Laliberté                                                               |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  October                20, 2005                                                                    |
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3630 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3630 ES

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN RHETT W. SCHILLER POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in 

4 Waterford, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. 

10 Schiller Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate December 19, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3630 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostW. Schiller Post Office’’. in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Rhett al Service located at 218 North Milwaukee Street
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Methods and lessons for business resilience and recovery surveys      

      May 24, 2023    

Surveys are important tools in business resilience and recovery research because of their ability to capture disaggregated economic information; however, they can be difficult and costly due to business operational dynamics and the larger challenges of disaster research. The COVID-19 pandemic serves as a recent example where demand for business data was high across both research and practice. Yet, the methods and modes for collecting data were limited due to safety, health, and ethical concerns. This research seeks to address the lack of tailored guidance for conducting business resilience and recovery surveys by collecting and synthesizing instruments and best practices from previous survey efforts. These previous surveys were undertaken by a diverse group of organizations with varied research questions, objectives, and hazard events of interest. This paper discusses six broad lessons: clearly define purpose, objectives, and concepts; recognize that response rates will be low, consider disaster dynamics in the research design, address bias that can be exacerbated by disasters, take care to acknowledge the unique ethical considerations of disaster resilience surveys in the business and economic context, and verify and validate data at all stages of the survey process. These lessons, in addition to the published instruments themselves, support researchers or practitioners who wish to conduct their own business resilience and recovery surveys in the future.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Anne M Wein, Ph.D.

##### Operations Research Analyst

Western Geographic Science Center

awein@usgs.gov

650-439-2463

## Related Content

#### Anne M Wein, Ph.D.

##### Operations Research Analyst

Western Geographic Science Center

awein@usgs.gov

650-439-2463

### Contact

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: May 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Samuel ShengSamuel ShengChief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           National Biological Service Research Supports Watershed Planning      

      January 1, 1996    

The National Biological Service's Leetown Science Center is investigating how human impacts on watershed, riparian, and in-stream habitats affect fish communities.  The research will provide the basis for a Ridge and Valley model that will allow resource managers to accurately predict and effectively mitigate human impacts on water quality.  The study takes place in the Opequon Creek  drainage basin of West Virginia.  A fourth-order tributary of the Potomac, the basin falls within the Ridge and Valley.  The study will identify biological components sensitive to land use patterns and the condition of the riparian zone; the effect of stream size, location, and other characteristics on fish communities; the extent to which remote sensing can reliable measure the riparian zone; and the relationship between the rate of landscape change and the structure of fish communities.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Craig D Snyder

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

csnyder@usgs.gov

304-724-4468

## Related Content

#### Craig D Snyder

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

csnyder@usgs.gov

304-724-4468

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Opequon Creek
                  - West Virginia

View All **
# L_2004270EN.01001701.xml

| 18.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/17

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1447/2004 of 13 August 2004 imposing provisional safeguard measures against imports of farmed salmon

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 267 of 14 August 2004
  )

On page 28, Annex I is replaced by the following:

‘ANNEX I

| CN code | TARIC code | Group | Origin (for groups 1 and 2) | Tariff quota (for groups 1 and 2) in tonnes (WFE) | Order Number for group 1 | Order Number for group 2 | Additional duty EUR/tonne |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Group 1 | Group 2 |
| ex 0302 12 00 | 0302120021 | 1 | Norway | 163 997 | 09.0780 | 09.0788 | 522 | 722 ’ |
| 0302120022 | 1 | Faeroes | 22 230 | 09.0694 | 09.0695 | | |
| 0302120023 | 1 | Other | 20 108 | 09.0077 | 09.0078 | | |
| 0302120029 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0302120039 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0302120099 | 1 | | | | | | |
| ex 0303 11 00 | 0303110019 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0303110099 | 1 | | | | | | |
| ex 0303 19 00 | 0303190019 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0303190099 | 1 | | | | | | |
| ex 0303 22 00 | 0303220021 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0303220022 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0303220023 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0303220029 | 1 | | | | | | |
| 0303220089 | 1 | | | | | | |
| ex 0304 10 13 | 0304101321 | 2 | | | | | | |
| 0304101329 | 2 | | | | | | |
| 0304101399 | 2 | | | | | | |
| ex 0304 20 13 | 0304201321 | 2 | | | | | | |
| 0304201329 | 2 | | | | | | |
| 0304201399 | 2 | | | | | | |

CN code

TARIC code

Group

Origin (for groups 1 and 2)

Tariff quota (for groups 1 and 2) in tonnes (WFE)

Order Number for group 1

Order Number for group 2

Additional duty EUR/tonne

Group 1

Group 2

ex 0302 12 00

0302120021

1

Norway

163 997

09.0780

09.0788

522

722 ’

0302120022

1

Faeroes

22 230

09.0694

09.0695

0302120023

1

Other

20 108

09.0077

09.0078

0302120029

1

0302120039

1

0302120099

1

ex 0303 11 00

0303110019

1

0303110099

1

ex 0303 19 00

0303190019

1

0303190099

1

ex 0303 22 00

0303220021

1

0303220022

1

0303220023

1

0303220029

1

0303220089

1

ex 0304 10 13

0304101321

2

0304101329

2

0304101399

2

ex 0304 20 13

0304201321

2

0304201329

2

0304201399

2

---
Nathaniel WAUGH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
From: "Doug Stakem" <Doug.Stakem@ametek.com>

To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Jack Patterson" <jgp@criterion-industrial.com>

Date: 05/06/2012 10:36 AM

Subject: NOx Analyzer Inquiry

Bill:

Regarding your inquiry for range on our Model 920 Multigas gas analyzer, the ranges are:

NO = 0 - 300 ppm

NO2 = 0 - 300 ppm

NOx = 0 - 300 ppm

This is a hot, wet, UV analyzer measurement. If you want to go to dry basis measurement, applying the 

Model 914 (also UV), ranges will be about 0 - 100 or 150 ppm for the above, depending on the process 

gas stream composition.

Please contact us for more details.

Regards,

Doug Stakem

Eastern Regional Sales Manager

AMETEK Process Instruments

455 Corporate Blvd.

Newark, DE 19702

302-456-4406

302-456-4444 (fax)

302-545-2195 (cell)

doug.stakem@ametek.com
Scope Contact

Data Integrity Check

Date Created: 05/02/2012 10:45:25 AM

Comments

Ametek NOx gas analyzer Model 920What is range in ppm of NOx for this analyzer?

Contact Information

Bill Neuffer

US EPA

Source Type: WEBSITE

Source Event: Ametek Website 01/01/2006 - 01/01/2007|KMCY-6SXJHH

Primary Address

US EPA

D 243-02

RTP, NC

United States 27711

Alternate Address

Email Address: neuffer.bill@epa.gov

Business Phone: 919-541-2284

Business Fax:

Home Phone:

Home Fax:

Other Phone:

Car Phone:

Pager Number:

Tool-Free Number:

Web Site:

Contact Type:

Language: English

Priority:

Sales Rep(s):

Telemarketer: Joy Carr/DE-NEW/Ametek

Other Contacts to update:
Oscar MEJIA-ROJO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1622

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017.

Osca Mejia-Rojo, Appellant, Pro se.

Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Scarlett RABALAIS, Appellant, v. SALT SPRINGS RESORT ASSOCIATION, INC., and Bosshardt Property Management, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
February 27, 2014

MEMORANDUM

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C.,20460

OFFICEOF

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION 

PREVENTION

SUBJECT: FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) Waiver Request for the Direct Final 

Rule and the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking-"Labeling of Pesticide 

Products and Devices for Export"

FROM: Laura E. Bailey, Manager/Executive Secretary

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (7201M)

TO: Steven Bradbury, Director

Office of Pesticide Programs (7501P)

The FIFRA SAP waives scientific review and comment on the proposed rulemaking 

entitled, "Regulation to Clarify Labeling of Pesticides Export", and the final rule entitled, 

"Labeling of Pesticide Products and Devices for Export; Clarification of Requirements." 

The revisions are administrative in nature and do not contain scientific issues that 

require the SAP's consideration.

Attachment

cc: Brian Frazer/FEAD (7506P) 

Martha Shimkin/FEAD (7506P) 

Kathryn Boyle/FEAD (7506P)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

February 4, 2014

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Request to Waive the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel's Review of the Direct 

Final Rule and the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, both Entitled "Labeling of 

Pesticide Products and Devices for Export"

FROM: Laura E. Bailey, Executive Secretary

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

TO: Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., Chair

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

Attached is the proposed rulemaking entitled, "Regulation to Clarify Labeling of 

Pesticides Export" and the final rule entitled, "Labeling of Pesticide Products and Devices for 

Export; Clarification of Requirements." EPA is taking direct final rule action to revise the 

regulations that pertain to labeling of pesticide products and devices intended solely for export. 

This action will allow placement of the required information on collateral labeling attached to a 

shipping container of such products rather than on the label of each individual product in such a 

shipment.

The FIFRA SAP previously waived its review of both rules because the rules are 

administrative in nature and do not contain any scientific issues that warrant review by the Panel. 

The purpose of the attached revised final rule is to restore the eliminated "supplemental labeling" 

provision which was inadvertently eliminated from the final rule.

The Agency requests the FIFRA SAP waive review of the final rule since it is 

administrative in nature and does not contain scientific issues that require the SAP's 

consideration. Please indicate your concurrence or non-concurrence with this request and I will 

notify the Agency accordingly.

RECOMMENDATION:

The FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel waives scientific review and comment on the final 

rule,"Labe · of estici e Products and Devices for Export; Clarification of Requirements."

Non-Concur ------- --------------------------

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

(Date)

(Date)

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w1th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on100% Postconsumer,Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           A landscape ecology approach to assessing development impacts in the tropics: A geothermal energy example in Hawaii      

      January 1, 2002    

Geographic information systems (GIS) are increasingly being used in environmental impact assessments (EIA) because GIS is useful for analysing spatial impacts of various development scenarios. Spatially representing these impacts provides another tool for landscape ecology in environmental and geographical investigations by facilitating analysis of the effects of landscape patterns on ecological processes and examining change over time. Landscape ecological principles are applied in this study to a hypothetical geothermal development project on the Island of Hawaii. Some common landscape pattern metrics were used to analyse dispersed versus condensed development scenarios and their effect on landscape pattern. Indices of fragmentation and patch shape did not appreciably change with additional development. The amount of forest to open edge, however, greatly increased with the dispersed development scenario. In addition, landscape metrics showed that a human disturbance had a greater simplifying effect on patch shape and also increased fragmentation than a natural disturbance. The use of these landscape pattern metrics can advance the methodology of applying GIS to EIA.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Uranium Power  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: September _20, 2004                By: /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Thornton J. Donaldson,
                                            Chief Financial Officer and Director
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 4(a)


Microfilm Number  9936-851    Filed with the Department of State on May 10 1999
                 ----------                                         -----------
Entity Number  2876437                /s/     [Illegible]
              -------------    -----------------------------------------------
                                      Secretary of the Commonwealth


                      CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                            DSCB: 15-8511 (Rev 90)


         In compliance with the requirements of 15 Pa.C.S. Section 8511
(relating to certificate of limited partnership), the undersigned desiring to
form a limited partnership, hereby certifies that:


1.  The name of the limited partnership is:  ATLAS-ENERGY FOR THE
NINETIES-PUBLIC #8 LTD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.  The (a) address of this limited partnership's initial registered office
in this Commonwealth or (b) name of its commercial registered office provider
and the county of venue is:

    (a) 311 ROUSER ROAD,     MOON TOWNSHIP     PA       15108   ALLEGHENY
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        Number and Street    City             State     Zip      County

    (b) c/o   N/A
                  ------------------------------------------------------------
                Number of Commercial Registered Office Provider         County


    For a limited partnership represented by a commercial registered office
    provider, the county in (b) shall be deemed the county in which the
    limited partnership is located for venue and official publication
    purposes.

3.  The name and business address of each general partner of the partnership
    is:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

       NAME                                     ADDRESS
       ----                                     -------
<S>                       <C>
ATLAS RESOURCES, INC.       311 ROUSER ROAD, MOON TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA 15108
</TABLE>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. (Check, and if appropriate complete, one of the following):

 X  The formation of the limited partnership shall be effective upon filing
--- this Certificate of Limited Partnership in the Department of State.

    The formation of the limited partnership shall be effective on:
---
-------- at -------
  Date       Hour

    IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned general partner(s) of the limited
partnership has (have) executed this Certificate of Limited Partnership this
6th day of MAY, 1999.


                                  /s/ J R. O'Mara
-------------------------       -----------------------------
    (Signature)                          (Signature)
                                 J.R. O'MARA, PRESIDENT & CEO
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 14, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00470-CR

NO. 14-13-00471-CR

NO. 14-13-00472-CR

RODNEY BRAND CRAWFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1332181, 1332182 & 1332183

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered pleas of guilty to three counts of aggravated robbery. On 

May 9, 2013, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 45 years in 

prison on each case with the sentences to run concurrently. Appellant filed a timely 

notice of appeal.
2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 

45 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Case 20-10981-AJC Doc 27 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-10981-AJC Doc 27 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 2
Hector CARRANZA v. STATE

CR-15-1454

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.