alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40858 Conference Calendar

DARRELL CLARK and SHANNA CLARK, Individually and as next friend of KENNEDI CLARK, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CV-34

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellants argue that the district court erred in dismissing their action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and AFFIRM the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. Darrell Clark and Shanna Clark,No. 96-40858 - 2 - Individually and a/n/f/ Kennedi Clark, a minor v. United States , No. 4:96-CV-34 (E.D. Tex. July 5, 1996).
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 UNDER
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Michael J. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Collectors Universe, Inc., for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
 made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:
  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
 registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: October 1, 2003/s/ MICHAEL J. LEWISMichael J. LewisChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

In Re: Case No: 19-21093-LMI 

CHAPTER 13 

CLEVELAND HART 

Debtor(s) 

________________________/ 

AGREED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 

D/B/A CHAMPION MORTGAGE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR RELIEF 

FROM AUTOMATIC STAY 

 

THIS MATTER having come before the court, upon the Motion for Relief from 

Automatic Stay [Docket No.: 43] Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Champion Mortgage Company 

(“Movant”). The Court noting that the parties are in agreement and being otherwise advised on 

the premises, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 5, 2020.

Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 62 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 2
1. The Hearing on the Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay is continued to 

October 6, 2020, at 9:00a.m., by Telephone via Court Solutions. 

### 

Submitted by: 

Shirley Palumbo, Esq. 

Florida Bar #: 73520 

Greenspoon Marder LLP 

City Place, 525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 900 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Telephone: (954)491-1120 

Facsimile: (954)343-6982 

Attorney Shirley Palumbo, Esq. is directed to mail a conformed copy of this Order 

to all interested parties and to file a Certificate of Service with the clerk of the 

Bankruptcy Court. 

Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 62 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 2
March 5, 2012

Mr. Kynan Spethman

Northstar Jet, Inc. 1 Corporate Way

Missoula, MT 59808

Dear Mr. Spethman:

This is in response to your February 24, 2012 letter (public docket No. FAA-2012-0194) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Northstar Jet, Inc. (Northstar) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Northstar to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

Northstar Jet, Inc. is an active air tour operator (defined under §91.147) with a Letter of Authorization (# P2VJR172) and a repair station with an active A449 Operations Specification (#NTBR983G). Our records confirm that Northstar Jet, Inc. did have an active air tour and repair station program. As an air tour operator, Northstar Jet, Inc. is required to have an LOA and implement their program prior to the start of operations. As a repair station, Northstar Jet, Inc. is not required to have a program; however, they may choose to implement a program on their own. Northstar Jet, Inc. may combine the program under the air tour operation without an exemption. To do this, Northstar Jet, Inc. must contact their FAA principal maintenance inspector and request that their repair station A449 is annotated with an ‘A3’ in the telephone field. For more information, Northstar Jet, Inc. should contact the Drug Abatement Division directly at (202) 267-8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov

.2 Because the relief you seek is covered under 14 CFR part 120, and the exemption does not apply, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rafael Ramos Manager, Drug Abatement Division

Enclosure
# L_2005048EN.01004701.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/47

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2256/2004 of 14 October 2004 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 as regards Community tariff quotas for certain products originating in Egypt, in Malta and in Cyprus and as regards reference quantities for certain products originating in Malta and in Cyprus

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 385 of 29 December 2004
  )

On page 24, in the first recital,

for:

‘... Decision 2004/664/EC (3) ...’,

3

read:

‘... Decision 2005/89/EC (3) ...’.

3

And at the foot of the page, footnote (3),

for:

| ‘(3) | OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 28.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(3)

read:

| ‘(3) | OJ L 31, 4.2.2005, p. 30.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(3)

---
**Exhibit
31**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  I, George
A. Cretecos, certify that:
 1.I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nathaniel Energy
Corporation;

2.Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.The
issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the issuer and have:  a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the issuer, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered b
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter
      (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      issuer’s control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Date:
      May 16, 2005
    /s/  
      George A. Cretecos
      George
      A. Cretecos
      Chief
      Operating Officer
      (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal
      Accounting
      Officer)
4 of 5: Oil Floor Spreadsheet 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 11/21/2011 03:50 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell 

 

Oil_Variab Floor Analysis Combo_111811.xlsx 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

*********************************************************
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned officers of OpenTV Corp. certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

(1) this quarterly report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OpenTV Corp.



|                       |  |     |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    Nigel W. Bennett                 
|                       |  |     |  | Nigel W. Bennett Chief
Executive Officer
|                       |  |    
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    Shum Mukherjee                   
|                       |  |     |  | Shum Mukherjee Chief Financial
Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, has been provided to OpenTV Corp. and will be retained by OpenTV Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

61290

Vol. 60, No. 229

Wednesday, November 29, 1995

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

[CPSC Docket No. 96-C0001]

J.B.I., Inc., a Corporation; Provisional

Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement

and Order

Correction

In notice document 95–28347

beginning on page 57577 in the issue of

Thursday, November 16, 1995, make

following correction:

On page 57579, in the first column, in

paragraph 23., in the nineth line, after

‘‘not’’ insert ‘‘receive any written

request not’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. MG95-7-001]

Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership;

Notice of Filing

Correction

In notice document 95–28566

beginning on page 58080, in the issue of

Friday, November 24, 1995, in the third

column, the docket number should read

as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 49

[AG Order No. 1985-95]

RIN 1105-AA37

Use and Examination of Materials

Submitted Pursuant to the Antitrust

Civil Process Act

Correction

In rule document 95–20984 beginning

on page 44276 in the issue of Friday,

August 25, 1995, make the folling

corrections:

§ 49.2 [Corrected]

1. On page 44277, in the 1st column,

in § 49.2(a), the 11th line should read

‘‘the Antitrust Division), shall, unless’’.

§ 49.3 [Corrected]

2. On page 44277, in the second

column, in § 49.3 introductory text, in

the sixth line, ‘‘agent’’ should read

‘‘agents’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AH20

Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment

of Ocean, NJ, Nonappropriated Fund

Wage Area

Correction

In rule document 95–26946 appearing

on page 55423 in the issue of

Wednesday, November 1, 1996 make the

following correction:

Appendix D to Subpart D of Part 532

[Corrected]

On page 55423, in the third column,

in Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532,

the entry for New Jersey is corrected as

follows:

Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—

Nonappropriated Fund Wage and

Survey Areas

* * * * *

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:

New Jersey:

Atlantic

Ocean

* * * * *

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

THE REGULATORY PLAN AND

UNIFIED AGENDA OF FEDERAL

REGULATIONS

Correction

In the Regulatory Plan and Unified

Agenda of Federal Regulations

published in the issue of November 28,

1995, in parts II through LXVI, the file

date ‘‘11-24-95’’ should read ‘‘11-27-

95’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary report on the Comet area, Jefferson County, Montana      

      January 1, 1953    

View Document

Several radioactivity anomalies and a few specimens of sooty pitchblende and other uranium minerals have been found on the mine dumps of formerly productive base- and precious-metal mines along the Comet-Gray Eagle shear zone in the Comet area in southwestern Montana. The shear zone is from 50 to 200 feet wide and has been traced for at least 5? miles. It trends N. 80 ? W. across the northern part of the area and cuts the quartz monzonitic rocks of the Boulder batholith and younger silicic intrusive rocks, as well as prebatholithic volcanic rocks, and is in turn cut by dacite and andesite dikes. 

The youngest period of mineralization is represented by chalcedonic vein zones comprising one or more discontinuous stringers and veins of cryptocrystalline silica in silicified quartz monzonite and in alaskite that has not been appreciably silicified. In some places these zones contain no distinct chalcedonic veins but are represented only by silicified quartz monzonite. These zones locally contain uranium in association with very small amounts of pyrite, galena, ruby silver, arqentite, native silver, molybdenite, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, and barite. At the Free Enterprise mine, uranium has been produced from a narrow chalcedonic vein that contains disseminated secondary uranium minerals and local small pods of pitchblende and also from disseminated secondary uranium ,minerals in the adjacent quartz monzonite. 

Undiscovered deposits of uranium ore may occur spatially associated with the base- and precious-metal deposits along the Comet-Gray Eagle shear zone and with chalcedonic vein zones similar to the Free Enterprise.

## Citation Information
# L_2004298EN.01002401.xml

| 23.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 13 September 2004

appointing a new member of the Commission of the European Communities

(2004/652/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 128 thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Louis MICHEL is hereby appointed a member of the Commission for the period from 13 September 2004 to 31 October 2004.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 13 September 2004.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2004.

For the Council

The President

B. R. BOT

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Monitoring storm tide and flooding from Hurricane Sandy along the Atlantic coast of the United States, October 2012      

      February 27, 2013    

View Document

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) deployed a temporary monitoring network of water-level and barometric pressure sensors at 224 locations along the Atlantic coast from Virginia to Maine to continuously record the timing, areal extent, and magnitude of hurricane storm tide and coastal flooding generated by Hurricane Sandy. These records were greatly supplemented by an extensive post-flood high-water mark (HWM) flagging and surveying campaign from November to December 2012 involving more than 950 HWMs. Both efforts were undertaken as part of a coordinated federal emergency response as outlined by the Stafford Act under a directed mission assignment by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Brian McCallum

##### National Streamgage Networks Coordinator

Water Resources Mission Area

bemccall@usgs.gov

678-924-6672

#### Shaun  M. Wicklein

##### Associate Director for Data

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

smwickle@usgs.gov

804-399-9929

#### Ronald Busciolano

##### Supervisory Hydrologist(Geol)

New York Water Science Center

rjbuscio@usgs.gov

631-736-0783

#### Jaime A Painter

##### Program Manager, Water Use and Water Budget Research Science Programs

Water Resources Mission Area

jpainter@usgs.gov

#### Anthony J Gotvald, PE

##### Surface-Water Specialist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

agotvald@usgs.gov

678-924-6648

## Related Content

#### Brian McCallum

##### National Streamgage Networks Coordinator

Water Resources Mission Area

bemccall@usgs.gov

678-924-6672

#### Shaun  M. Wicklein

##### Associate Director for Data

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

smwickle@usgs.gov

804-399-9929

#### Ronald Busciolano

##### Supervisory Hydrologist(Geol)

New York Water Science Center

rjbuscio@usgs.gov

631-736-0783

#### Jaime A Painter

##### Program Manager, Water Use and Water Budget Research Science Programs

Water Resources Mission Area

jpainter@usgs.gov

#### Anthony J Gotvald, PE

##### Surface-Water Specialist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

agotvald@usgs.gov

678-924-6648

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Delaware
                  -  Maine
                  -  Maryland
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  New York
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  Rhode Island
                  -  Virginia

View All **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6502

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL SNIPE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-9-N, CA-97-396-2) Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 28, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Michael Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Michael Snipe seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). Snipe raised two issues in the district court; he raised entirely new claims on appeal. Snipe forfeited the issues raised in the district court by not raising them on appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). The arguments made to this court in Snipe’s informal brief are not cognizable because they were not raised in the district court. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED