alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4727 

To require the Secretary of the Department of Energy to issue a report 

on fusion innovation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2016 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Department of Energy to 

issue a report on fusion innovation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON FUSION INNOVATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than six months after 

5 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

6 Department of Energy shall transmit to the Committee 

7 on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

9 Resources of the Senate a report that will identify engi10 neering designs for innovative fusion energy systems that 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4727 IH

1 have the potential to demonstrate net energy production 

2 not later than 15 years after the start of construction. In 

3 this report, the Secretary will identify budgetary require4 ments that would be necessary for the Department to 

5 carry out a fusion innovation initiative to accelerate re6 search and development of these designs. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

IN RE:

CADIS ELIAS FORNARIS PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 13

MAYLIN TORRES VALENTE CASE NO.: 19-26155-BKC-LMI 

 DEBTOR(S) / 

MOTION TO APPROVE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT AND 

AUTHORIZE DISBURSEMENT TO TRUSTEE

COMES NOW, the Debtors, Cadis Elias Fornaris, Jr and Maylin Torres Valiente, by and 

through the undersigned counsel and file this Motion to Approve Personal Injury Settlement and 

Authorize Disbursement to Trustee, and as grounds thereof state as follows:

1. On December 2, 2019, Debtors filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy relief. 

2. Debtors Bankruptcy Case was confirmed on February 14, 2020.

3. At the time of filing debtors had a pending lawsuit. 

4. Debtors personal injury attorney has issued a settlement in the amount of $10,000.00 to 

which Debtors are entitled to $3,907.94. The proceeds from said settlement in which 

debtors are entitled to, are to be disbursed to the Trustee Nancy K. Neidich. 

5. The Debtors personal injury attorney is requiring a court order granting distribution to 

trustee of said funds. 

WHEREFORE, the Debtors, Cadis Elias Fornaris, Jr and Maylin Torres Valiente, respectfully 

request that this Court grants this Motion to Approve Personal Injury Settlement and Authorize 

Disbursement Trustee and for any such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and 

equitable under the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Patrick L Cordero, Esq

Attorney for Debtor(s).

7333 Coral Way 

Miami, Florida 33155

Tel: (305) 445-4855

By: /s/ (FILED ECF) 

Patrick L. Cordero, Esq., FBN 801992

Case 19-26155-LMI Doc 38 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 1
Mushtaq Ahmed MIAN and Yasmin Mushtaq Mian, Appellants, v. HERRON BAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-3147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-15-00596-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE OVIDIO GARCIA JR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

Relator, Ovidio Garcia Jr., proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

in the above cause on December 17, 2015. Through this original proceeding, relator 

seeks to compel the assigned judge to set a hearing on relator’s motion to recuse the trial 

court judge and to issue a ruling thereon. 

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Omar Escobar, et al., or any 

others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to 

the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of 

this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of December, 2015.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00035-CV

Christopher Jay King, Appellant

v.

Nicole Carter King, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BURNET COUNTY,

NO. 23017, HONORABLE W. R. SAVAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Christopher Jay King filed his notice of appeal on January 23, 2007, and

the appellate record was filed the same day. On July 31, 2007, the clerk of this Court sent

appellant notice that his brief was overdue and that his appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution if he did not respond to this Court by August 10, 2007. To date, appellant has not

responded to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 11, 2007
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Prioritizing bird conservation actions in the Prairie Hardwood transition of the Midwestern United States      

      July 2, 2014    

Large-scale planning for the conservation of species is often hindered by a poor understanding of factors limiting populations. In regions with declining wildlife populations, it is critical that objective metrics of conservation success are developed to ensure that conservation actions achieve desired results. Using spatially explicit estimates of bird abundance, we evaluated several management alternatives for conserving bird populations in the Prairie Hardwood Transition of the United States. We designed landscapes conserving species at 50% of their current predicted abundance as well as landscapes attempting to achieve species population targets (which often required the doubling of current abundance). Conserving species at reduced (half of current) abundance led to few conservation conflicts. However, because of extensive modification of the landscape to suit human use, strategies for achieving regional population targets for forest bird species would be difficult under even ideal circumstances, and even more so if maintenance of grassland bird populations is also desired. Our results indicated that large-scale restoration of agricultural lands to native grassland and forest habitats may be the most productive conservation action for increasing bird population sizes but the level of landscape transition required to approach target bird population sizes may be societally unacceptable.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Wayne E Thogmartin, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

wthogmartin@usgs.gov

608-781-6309

#### Shawn Crimmins, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

scrimmins@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Wayne E Thogmartin, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center

wthogmartin@usgs.gov

608-781-6309

#### Shawn Crimmins, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

scrimmins@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center          

2630 Fanta Reed RoadLa Crosse, WI54603United States

(608) 783-6451

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Illinois;Indiana;Iowa;Michigan;Minnesota;Wisconsin
                  - Illinois
                  - Indiana
                  - iowa
                  - Michigan
                  - Minnesota
                  - wisconsin

View All **
68 YACHT CLUB LAND TRUST, Appellant, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Milan Daniel Boyanich, Covered Bridge Condominium Association, Inc., Scott Goldstein, and Tony Torres, Appellees.

No. 4D18-188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 14, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2004234EN.01000201.xml

| 21.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3509 — KBC/RABOBANK/JV)

(2004/C 234/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3509. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3509. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Microbial abundance in the deep subsurface of the Chesapeake Bay impact crater: Relationship to lithology and impact processes      

      January 1, 2009    

Asteroid and comet impact events are known to cause profound disruption to surface ecosystems. The aseptic collection of samples throughout a 1.76-km-deep set of cores recovered from the deep subsurface of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure has allowed the study of the subsurface biosphere in a region disrupted by an impactor. Microbiological enumerations suggest the presence of three major microbiological zones. The upper zone (127–867 m) is characterized by a logarithmic decline in microbial abundance from the surface through the postimpact section of Miocene to Upper Eocene marine sediments and across the transition into the upper layers of the impact tsunami resurge sediments and sediment megablocks. In the middle zone (867–1397 m) microbial abundances are below detection. This zone is predominantly quartz sand, primarily composed of boulders and blocks, and it may have been mostly sterilized by the thermal pulse delivered during impact. No samples were collected from the large granite block (1096–1371 m). The lowest zone (below 1397 m) of increasing microbial abundance coincides with a region of heavily impact-fractured, hydraulically conductive suevite and fractured schist. These zones correspond to lithologies influenced by impact processes. Our results yield insights into the influence of impacts on the deep subsurface biosphere.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### J. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

whorton@usgs.gov

703-648-6933

## Related Content

#### J. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

whorton@usgs.gov

703-648-6933

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Chesapeake Bay
                  - Virginia

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60508]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DF FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. BEACH DEVELOPERS, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 11, 2018

Richard H. Weisberg (Sanford), for appellants.

Robert P. Frankel (Plantation), for appellee.

Before LAGOA, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landslides in Minnesota      

      March 7, 2022    

View Report

Landslides in Minnesota have caused loss of life, damaged infrastructure, and negatively affected Minnesota’s natural resources. Landslides increase the amount of sediment contributed to lakes and rivers, with negative consequences for water quality and aquatic habitats. Recent mapping reveals that landslide susceptible areas within Minnesota primarily occur on steep slopes adjacent to rivers, lakes, and transportation corridors. Local variation in landslide susceptibility is related to the underlying geology and glacial history.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Stephen B DeLong, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

sdelong@usgs.gov

651-356-4102

## Related Content

#### Stephen B DeLong, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Research Geologist

Earthquake Hazards Program

sdelong@usgs.gov

651-356-4102

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Minnesota

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Thornton J.  Donaldson,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of CanWest  Petroleum
Corporation (f/k/a Uranium Power Corporation) (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 20, 2004

                                        By: /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name: Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4757 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4757

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility for 
   headstones, markers, and medallions furnished by the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs for deceased individuals who were awarded the Medal of 
              Honor and are buried in private cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

Mr. Miller of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility for 
   headstones, markers, and medallions furnished by the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs for deceased individuals who were awarded the Medal of 
              Honor and are buried in private cemeteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR HEADSTONES, MARKERS, AND 
              MEDALLIONS FOR MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS.

    Section 2306(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5)(A) In carrying out this subsection with respect to a deceased 
individual described in subparagraph (C), the Secretary shall furnish, 
upon request, a headstone or marker under paragraph (1) or a medallion 
under paragraph (4) that signifies the deceased's status as a Medal of 
Honor recipient.
    ``(B) If the Secretary furnished a headstone, marker, or medallion 
under paragraph (1) or (4) for a deceased individual described in 
subparagraph (C) that does not signify the deceased's status as a Medal 
of Honor recipient, the Secretary shall, upon request, replace such 
headstone, marker, or medallion with a headstone, marker, or medallion, 
as the case may be, that so signifies the deceased's status as a Medal 
of Honor recipient.
    ``(C) A deceased individual described in this subparagraph is a 
deceased individual who--
            ``(i) served in the Armed Forces on or after April 6, 1917;
            ``(ii) is eligible for a headstone or marker furnished 
        under paragraph (1) or a medallion furnished under paragraph 
        (4) (or would be so eligible for such headstone, marker, or 
        medallion but for the date of the death of the individual); and
            ``(iii) was awarded the Medal of Honor (including 
        posthumously).''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2004328EN.01009601.xml

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/96

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1915/2004

of 29 October 2004

fixing the production refund for olive oil used in the manufacture of certain preserved foods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats (1), and in particular Article 20a thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 20a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for the granting of a production refund for olive oil used in the preserving industry. Pursuant to paragraph 6 of that Article, and without prejudice to paragraph 3 thereof, the Commission shall fix this refund every two months. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 20a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for the granting of a production refund for olive oil used in the preserving industry. Pursuant to paragraph 6 of that Article, and without prejudice to paragraph 3 thereof, the Commission shall fix this refund every two months.

| (2) | By virtue of Article 20a(2) of the abovementioned Regulation, the production refund must be fixed on the basis of the gap between prices on the world market and on the Community market, taking account of the import charge applicable to olive oil falling within CN subheading 1509 90 00 and the factors used for fixing the export refunds for those olive oils during the reference period. It is appropriate to take as a reference period the two-month period preceding the beginning of the term of validity of the production refund. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By virtue of Article 20a(2) of the abovementioned Regulation, the production refund must be fixed on the basis of the gap between prices on the world market and on the Community market, taking account of the import charge applicable to olive oil falling within CN subheading 1509 90 00 and the factors used for fixing the export refunds for those olive oils during the reference period. It is appropriate to take as a reference period the two-month period preceding the beginning of the term of validity of the production refund.

| (3) | The application of the above criteria results in the refund being fixed as shown below, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The application of the above criteria results in the refund being fixed as shown below,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the months of November and December 2004, the amount of the production refund referred to in Article 20a(2) of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be 44,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97).

1

---
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 1/21/97

TENTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE WIFORD,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 96-5163

v. N.D. Oklahoma

BOBBY BOONE, Warden; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

OKLAHOMA, sued as: Susan Loving,

Respondents - Appellees.

(D.C. No. 94-CV-821) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.
-2-

This matter is before the court on George Wiford’s application for a certificate of

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. In April, 1990, Wiford was sentenced to life

imprisonment after pleading guilty to first degree murder. After exhausting state

remedies, Wiford filed this, his first, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas

corpus, alleging (1) that his detention center denied him access to Oklahoma case law and

statutes, and (2) that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel, in that his attorney

failed to call certain witnesses at his preliminary hearing, failed to have his competency

evaluated, and failed to request a change of venue. The district court denied the petition. 

In his application to this court, Wiford raises only the ineffective assistance claim.

We may issue a certificate of appealability “only if the applicant has made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(c)(2). We have

reviewed Wiford’s application and the record before us. For substantially the same

reasons expressed in the district court’s order dated June 24, 1996, we conclude that

Wiford has not made the showing necessary to warrant our issuance of a certificate. 

Therefore, we DENY his application and DISMISS the appeal.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0128

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KURTTIS WARREN COPYAK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 8 2023

08/08/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0128