alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004244EN.01003701.xml

| 16.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/37

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1307/2004

of 15 July 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 14 July 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 14 July 2004.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 14 July 2004, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 34,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

3

---
EXHIBIT 99.6


GLJPetroleum ConsultantsPrincipal Officers:Keith M. Braaten, P. Eng.President & CEO                                Jodi L. Anhorn, P. Eng.Executive Vice President & COOOfficers / Vice Presidents:Terry L. Aarsby, P. Eng.                     Caralyn P. Bennett, P. Eng.                 Leonard L. Herchen, P. Eng.Myron J. Hladyshevsky, P. Eng.                 Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng.                                Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.                                 Mark Jobin, P. Geol.                                    John E. Keith, P. Eng.                                 John H. Stilling, P. Eng.                         Douglas R. Sutton, P. Eng.James H. Willmon, P. Eng.





CONSENT OF GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.





TO:     Pengrowth Energy Corporation


2100, 222-3 Avenue SW


Calgary, Alberta T2P OB4


We hereby consent to the reference to our name and report evaluating Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2013 and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 and (ii) the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-180888) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.


Yours truly,


GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.








Doug R. Sutton, P. Eng.


Vice President





Calgary, Alberta


February 28, 2014





4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2 • (403) 266-9500 • Fax (403) 262-1855 • GLJPC.com
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

Vicki Lee Grusby Case No.: 20-11033-SMG

Chapter 13

Debtor(s).

 / 

ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS CASE FILED BY CREDITOR

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTED

(ECF 52)

THIS MATTER CAME before the Court on the consent calendar on October 14, 2021 upon

the Amended Motion to Dismiss Case filed by Creditor The Bank of New Mellon (ECF 52). Based

upon the record, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Creditor’s Amended Motion to Dismiss Case is DENIED without prejudice for

failure to prosecuted.

###

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 26, 2021.

Case 20-11033-SMG Doc 54 Filed 10/26/21 Page 1 of 2
Submitted by:

Mitchell J. Nowack, Esq.

Christian J. Olson, Esq.

NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

8551 Sunrise Blvd., Suite 208

Plantation, FL 33322

(954) 349-2265

Copies furnished to:

NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order to all creditors

and interested parties immediately upon receipt thereof.

Case 20-11033-SMG Doc 54 Filed 10/26/21 Page 2 of 2
$40"4/ 4. 

# 7
Douglas , J. Saitta Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433 (1987) (noting that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

cc: Hon. Deborah Schumacher, District Judge, Family Court Division Pearl E.S. Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-24331-BKC-PGH 

 CHAPTER 13 

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. 

__________________________/ 

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM NO. 3-1

 

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the Chapter 13 consent calendar on March 2, 2020 on 

the Debtor’s Objection to Claim Number 3-1 (DE 35), and there being no objections otherwise 

raised, it is, therefore: 

 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Court sustains the Debtor’s Objection to Claim of the Department of the Treasury – 

Internal Revenue Service (Claim No. 3-1). 

2. The Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service’s priority claim shall be 

limited to $214.88 for 2012 taxes owing. 

 ###

Submitted by: 

Law Offices of Michael H. Johnson, P.A. 

3601 W. Commercial Blvd. Suite 31 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

(954) 535-1131 

(954) 641-7750 fax 

Michael H. Johnson is directed to serve copies of this order on all interested parties and file a 

certificate of service.

Paul G. Hyman, Jr.,Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 4, 2020.

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 52 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 1
# L_2005036EN.01001101.xml

| 9.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/11

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 8 February 2005

on the continuation in the year 2005 of Community comparative trials and tests on propagating and planting material of Prunus domestica under Council Directive 92/34/EEC started in 2003

(2005/117/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/34/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production (1),

Having regard to Commission Decision 2002/745/EC of 5 September 2002 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on propagating and planting material of fruit plants under Council directive 92/34/EEC (2), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Decision 2002/745/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Directive 92/34/EEC as regards Prunus domestica from 2003 to 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decision 2002/745/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Directive 92/34/EEC as regards Prunus domestica from 2003 to 2007.

| (2) | Tests and trials carried out in 2003 and 2004 should be continued in 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Tests and trials carried out in 2003 and 2004 should be continued in 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2003 on propagating and planting material of Prunus domestica shall be continued in 2005 in accordance with Decision 2002/745/EC.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 157, 10.6.1992, p. 10. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2003/111/EC (OJ L 311, 27.11.2003, p. 12).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 240, 7.9.2002, p. 65.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 56 (Thursday, March 23, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 15268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20323]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT
      10.26**





**EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT EXTENSION**





THIS
      AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (the “Agreement”) is made and
      entered into effective as of April 13, 2007 between FindEx.com, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Corporation”), and Kirk R. Rowland (“Officer”) as a term
      extension to the previous Employment Agreement originally entered into on July
      25, 2003.





**R** **** **E** **** **C** **** **I** **** **T** **** **A** **** **L** **** **S**





THE
      PARTIES AGREE to modify Section 3.2 of the Employment Agreement as follows:





The
      term
“Corporation’s Net Income” shall be replaced with “Income (Loss) from Operations
      adjusted for Other Income and Interest Expense, as determined by the
      Corporation’s annual audit”.





WITNESS
      WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the day and
      year first above written.








OFFICER:







/s/
      Kirk R. Rowland


Kirk
      Rowland








COMPANY:








/s/
      Steven Malone


Steven
      Malone


FindEx.com,
      Inc.
H.S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Juan X. GOMEZ and Margie Gomez, Appellants, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as trustee, in trust for the Registered Holders of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-43 CB, Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2006-43CB, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa; and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellants.

Kristen M. Crescenti, Ronnie J. Bitman, and Allison Morat of Pearson Bitman LLP, Maitland; and Dariel Abrahamy of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Eric Denorris KENNEDY v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-00755-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 21, 2018 Closed: July 26, 2018

Certiorari - Granted.
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No: 19-25814-PGH

Chapter 13

ROSIE RANCHER SMITH

 Debtor /

OBJECTION TO CLAIM #6 FILED BY CITY OF HOLLYWOOD

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority

status of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to identify

which claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B) (2), the debtor objects to the 

following claim filed in this case:

Claim 

No.

Name of Claimant Amount of 

Claim

Basis for Objection and Recommended 

Disposition

6 City of Hollywood $90.58 On or about December 11, 2019, the 

Claimant filed a secured proof of claim in 

the amount of $90.58 for utility services. 

The Debtor’s regular payment is current 

and the Debtor will continue making 

direct payments to the Claimant.

Therefore, the claim should be allowed, 

but receive no distribution from the 

Chapter 13 Trustee through the Plan. 

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this objection 

will be served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the confirmation hearing

date and that a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the 

court when the objection and notice of hearing are served.

Respectfully submitted this 17th day of February, 2020. 

Case 19-25814-PGH Doc 50 Filed 02/17/20 Page 1 of 2
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

330 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

(954) 765-3166

(954) 756-7103 (facsimile)

Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

By: /s/ Chad Van Horn, Esq.

Chad Van Horn, Esq.

 FL Bar 64500

Case 19-25814-PGH Doc 50 Filed 02/17/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-60210]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of Florida

In re South Atlantic Regional Center, LLC Case No. 19-25762-EPK

Debtor(s) Chapter 7

CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT (RULE 7007.1)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7007.1 and to enable the Judges to evaluate possible disqualification or

recusal, the undersigned counsel for South Atlantic Regional Center, LLC in the above captioned action, certifies that the

following is a (are) corporation(s), other than the debtor or a governmental unit, that directly or indirectly own(s) 10% or

more of any class of the corporation's(s') equity interests, or states that there are no entities to report under FRBP 7007.1:

 None [Check if applicable]

July 14, 2020 /s/ Scott N. Brown, Esq.

Date Scott N. Brown, Esq.

Signature of Attorney or Litigant

Counsel for Chpt. 7 Trustee of South Atlantic Regional Center, LLC

BAST AMRON LLP

One Southeast Third Avenue

Suite 1400

Miami, FL 33131

305.379.7904 Fax:305.379.7905

sbrown@bastamron.com

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2020 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 19-25762-EPK Doc 96 Filed 07/14/20 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF MARY EUBANKS

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mary Eubanks, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Mary Eubanks
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Mary Eubanks
                                         Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                         May 13, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.01

                                                                     Schedule II

                              ROYSTER-CLARK, INC
                        Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
                                (In Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          Amounts
                                            Balance      charged to                      Balance
                                           beginning     costs and                        end of
                                           of period      expenses      Deductions(1)     period
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Year Ended December 31, 1998                 $1,800       451,259         (451,259)       1,800

Nine Months Year Ended December 31, 1999     $8,245         1,703           (2,916)       7,032

Year Ended December 31, 2000                 $7,032         2,800           (3,941)       5,891

</TABLE>

----------------------------------
(1)  Amounts determined not collectible, net of recoveries.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of CoConnect, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005, Robert Thele and Dean Becker hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:  a. the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  November 16, 2006    /s/ Dean Becker Dean Becker, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)   November 16, 2006   10
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the p eriod ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.







Dated: August 14, 2012
By:
/s/ Samuel ShengSamuel ShengChief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 129 (Thursday, July 6, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10706]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Parts 141 to 199


Title 19 Parts 141 to 199; Republication

CFR Correction

    Title 19 parts 141 to 199, revised as of April 1, 1995, is being 
republished in its entirety. The earlier issuance inadvertently omitted 
text from the Appendix to part 181. The omitted text should begin on 
page 411 after the second entry in the first table.

Billing Code 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20613]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Antonio JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-2272

Supreme Court of Florida.

[June 28, 2018]

Martin J. McClain of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Wilton Manors, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Donna M. Perry, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Jose Antonio Jimenez's appeal of the circuit court's order denying Jimenez's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Jimenez's motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida* , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). Jimenez responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Jimenez's response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Jimenez is not entitled to relief. Jimenez was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. *Jimenez v. State* , 703 So.2d 437, 438 (Fla. 1997). His sentence of death became final in 1998. *Jimenez v. Florida* , 523 U.S. 1123, 118 S.Ct. 1806, 140 L.Ed.2d 945 (1998). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Jimenez's sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock* , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Jimenez's motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Jimenez, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock* . *Id.* at 220-23 (Pariente, J., dissenting). Of course, if *Hurst*1 applied to *397Jimenez's case, he would not be entitled to relief based on the jury's unanimous recommendation for death, coupled with the absence of any stricken aggravating factors. *Jimenez v. State* , 703 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1997) ; *See**Davis v. State* , 207 So.3d 142, 174-75 (Fla. 2016).

1

*Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017).