alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  
    
    the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F and the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 33-143810) and the Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-158580) of our auditors report
dated
March 8, 2010 on the
consolidated balance sheets of Pengrowth Energy Trust (the
Trust) as at December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the consolidated statements of income and deficit and cash flows for each
the years then ended; and
 
    
    the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of our Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm dated
March 8, 2010 on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
  signed
KPMG
# N FILED SEP - 8 2011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk. U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts for the District of ColumbIa

James F. McMillan, Petitioner,
v. United States ofAmerica, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# 11 

# 161a

This action, brought

### pro se, is before the Court on the petitioner's application for a writ of 

### habeas corpus, accompanied by an application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed 

### informapauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary McCreary in Pine Knot, Kentucky. He challenges the sufficiency ofthe evidence supporting his sodomy conviction entered by the Superior Court ofthe District ofColumbia. 

### See Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus by a Person in Custody in the District ofColumbia at 2, 5-6. 

### It is established that challenges to a Superior Courtjudgment ofconviction must be pursued in that court under D.C. Code 

### § 23-110, 

### see Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1042-43 (D.C. Cir. 1998); 

### Byrdv. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36-37 (D.C. Cir. 1997), and that absent a showing ofan inadequate or ineffective local remedy, "a District ofColumbia prisoner has no recourse to a federaljudicial forum." 

### Garris v. Lindsay, 794 F.2d 722, 726 (D.C. Cir. 1986), 

### cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993 (1986) (internal footnote omitted). Under District ofColumbia law, [an] application for a writ ofhabeas corpus in behalfofa prisoner who is authorized to 

# 3

### apply for reliefby motion pursuant to this section shall not be entertained by ... any Federal ... court ifit appears ... that the Superior Court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality ofhis detention. D.C. Code §23-11 O(g). The petitioner has not shown that his local remedy is inadequate to address his claims. Therefore, this Court lacksjurisdiction over the instant petition. A separate Order ofdismissal accompanies this Memorandum

# ~~&;

# 15;I-;G... Unitld ltates District Judge Date:

# 4·tt., 3 ,2011

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Mars Astrobiological Cave and Internal habitability Explorer (MACIE): A New Frontiers mission concept      

      April 1, 2021    

Martian subsurface habitability and astrobiology can be evaluated via a lava tube cave, without drilling. MACIE addresses two key goals of the Decadal Survey (2013–2022) and three MEPAG goals. New advances in robotic architectures, autonomous navigation, target sample selection, and analysis will enable MACIE to explore the Martian subsurface.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

#### Kaj Williams, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

kewilliams@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

#### Kaj Williams, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

kewilliams@usgs.gov

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Analogs
                  - Earth
                  - Mars
                  - Moon
                  - Research
                  - Missions
                  - Astrobiology
                  - Caves
                  - Planetary Science
                  - Mars caves
                  - Mars

View All **
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 19361

Employed part time (persons who usually work 

Number in thousands

25 years and over

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU02600048Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Employed, Usually Work Part Time - 25 

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:13 PM)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3594 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3594

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 
  tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance 
                               companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2012

    Mr. Harkin (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Rockefeller, and Ms. 
  Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 
  tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance 
                               companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR ALTERNATIVE TAX LIABILITY FOR 
              SMALL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 831(b)(2)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) the net written premiums (or, if 
                        greater, direct written premiums) for the 
                        taxable year do not exceed $2,025,000, and''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Paragraph (2) of section 831(b) of such 
Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2012, 
                the dollar amount set forth in subparagraph (A) shall 
                be increased by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for such 
                        calendar year by substituting `calendar year 
                        2011' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph 
                        (B) thereof.
                If the amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence 
                is not a multiple of $1,000, such amount shall be 
                rounded to the next lowest multiple of $1,000.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Occupancy and detectability of northern long-eared bats in the Lake States Region      

      December 8, 2020    

The northern long‐eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is one of the bat species most affected by white‐nose syndrome. Population declines attributed to white‐nose syndrome contributed to the species’ listing as federally threatened under the 1973 Endangered Species Act. Although one of the most abundant Myotine bats in eastern North America prior to white‐nose syndrome, little is known about northern long‐eared bats in the upper Midwest, USA. We assessed the habitat associations of the northern long‐eared bats on a regional scale using occupancy models that accounted for uncertainty in nightly detection to provide needed information on the distribution as white‐nose syndrome has recently arrived in this area. We monitored bat activity using zero‐crossing frequency‐division bat detectors for 10–15 nights at 20 detector sites at each of 3 sampling areas in Michigan, USA, and 6 sampling areas in Wisconsin, USA, stratified by mesic and xeric habitat types. We constructed northern long‐eared bat nightly detection histories for our occupancy analysis using maximum likelihood estimates from 2 commercially‐available automated identification programs: Kaleidoscope and Echoclass. We sampled for a total of 2,174 detector‐nights. Both Kaleidoscope and Echoclass identified northern long‐eared bat passes on 110 detector‐nights, whereas on 1,968 detector‐nights neither program identified a northern long‐eared bat call. Only one program or the other identified northern long‐eared bat calls on 206 detector‐nights, indicating an overall agreement rate of 35% on nights when calls were detected. We analyzed these data using an occupancy analysis accounting for the potential for false positives to assess the relationship between northern long‐eared bat presence and habitat characteristics. Our analyses indicated that the probability of a false positive at a site was low (0.015; 95% CI 0.009–0.021), and detection probability, but not occupancy, declined from 2015 to 2016 for sites in Wisconsin sampled in both years. Occupancy was positively associated with distance into the forest interior (distance from nearest road).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Ford, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

wford@usgs.gov

540-231-5927

## Related Content

#### Mark Ford, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

wford@usgs.gov

540-231-5927

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - Ecosystems
                  - United States
                  - Michigan
                  -  Wisconsin

View All **
Case 19-21621-PGH Doc 113 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-21621-PGH Doc 113 Filed 12/02/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-21621-PGH Doc 113 Filed 12/02/22 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30506 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NOLAN OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:95-CR-4-B-M

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nolan Osborne, Louisiana prisoner number 119714, pleaded guilty in federal court to three charges of distribution of crack cocaine and one charge of conspiracy to possess crack cocaine with intent to distribute. The district court sentenced him to serve 121 months in prison and a five-year term of supervised release. Osborne was placed on supervised release, but the Probation Office filed a motion to revoke his supervised release based on, inter alia, his arrest for drug-related activity.No. 04-30506 -2- Osborne subsequently pleaded guilty to drug charges in state court and received a seven-year sentence. Osborne has not shown that the district court erred in denying his “writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum” wherein he requested that the district court return him to federal custody, revoke his supervised release, and permit him to serve his state sentence concurrently with the remainder of his federal sentence. The district court was not obligated to hold a hearing pursuant to F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32.1 because Osborne was not taken into federal custody in relation to his violation of the terms of his supervised release. Osborne has no right to concurrent sentences, nor is he entitled to serve his sentences in any particular facility. See Tighe v. Wall , 100 F.3d 41, 42 (5th Cir. 1996); Saulsbury v. United States , 591 F.2d 1028, 1031, 1035 (5th Cir. 1979). To the extent that Osborne is attempting to challenge his state convictions, we decline to consider this argument because it was not presented to the district court. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Osborne has shown no error in the district court’s judgment. Accordingly, that judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23      Consent Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm     The Board of Directors United Bancshares, Inc.   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-106929) on Form S-8 of United Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2011, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of United Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Bancshares, Inc.   /s/   CLIFTON GUNDERSON LLP       Toledo, Ohio March 28, 2011
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141543 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141543 COA: 296393 Wayne CC: 96-009620 STEVEN D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 7, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to
meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to
remand is DENIED.
I,
Timothy C. Choate, Chief Executive Officer of Aptimus, Inc., certify
that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aptimus, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
  4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant **** and
have:
  (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
March 31, 2005
 
 /s/
      Timothy C. Choate
      Timothy
      C. Choate
      Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, M. Brinkley Morse, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Quest Software, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    M. BRINKLEY MORSE                                                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | M. Brinkley Morse, Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: MARY Z. MIRIAN Case No: 19-21621-LMI

 Chapter 13

 Debtor /

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 2, 2022, true and correct copies of the Debtor’s 

Certificate of Compliance, Motion for Issuance of Discharge, and Notice of Deadline to 

Object (ECF No. 113) were sent by Notice of Electronic Filing to:

Jennifer Laufgas on behalf of Creditor HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 

ecfflsb@aldridgepite.com, jlaufgas@ecf.courtdrive.com 

Wanda D Murray on behalf of Creditor HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 

ecfflsb@aldridgepite.com, WMurray@ecf.courtdrive.com 

Nancy K. Neidich 

e2c8f01@ch13miami.com, ecf2@ch13miami.com 

Office of the US Trustee 

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

And sent by U.S. Mail to:

LVNV Funding LLC

Resurgent Capital Services

PO Box 10587

Greenville, SC 29603-0587

CACH, LLC

Resurgent Capital Services

PO Box 10587

Greenville, SC 29603-0587

Respectfully submitted,

LEGAL SERVICES OF GREATER MIAMI, INC. 

By /s/ 

Matt Bayard Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 32209

Attorney for Debtor

4343 W. Flagler St., Suite 100

Miami, FL 33134

Telephone/Facsimile: (305) 438-2413

Email: mbayard@legalservicesmiami.org

Alt email: crodriguez@legalservicesmiami.org

Case 19-21621-PGH Doc 114 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-18-00740-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2018-23761

Style: Wayne Myers

v Pennymac Corporation

Date motion filed*: January 28, 2020

Type of motion:

Motion for Extension of Time to file Rehearing, Suggestion of Death, and Motion to 

Substitute Proper Party

Party filing motion: Charlie Jones

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Richard Hightower 

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower.

Date: March 5, 2020