Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 57 / Friday, March 24, 1995 / Notices 15555

tendered for filing a request for CIAC

treatment of certain facilities which are

required to be replaced pursuant to the

terms of the Mead-Phoenix Project

Westwing Substation Interconnection

Agreement (Agreement). The parties to

the Agreement are APS, The United

States of America, Salt River Project

Agricultural Improvement and Power

District, Department of Water and Power

of the City of Los Angeles, Nevada

Power Company, M-S-R Public Power

Agency, Southern California Public

Power Authority, Tucson Electric Power

Company, and City of Vernon.

In addition to all the Parties to this

Agreement copies of this filing have

been served upon El Paso Electric

Company, Public Service Company of

New Mexico, the Arizona Corporation

Commission, the New Mexico Public

Service Commission, the Public Utility

Commission of Texas, and the Nevada

Public Service Commission.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–712–000]

Take notice that on March 7, 1995,

Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy

Services), on behalf of Arkansas Power

& Light Company, Gulf States Utilities

Company, Louisiana Power & Light

Company, Mississippi Power & Light

Company, and New Orleans Public

Service Inc., tendered for filing a

Transmission Service Agreement (TSA)

between Entergy Services and Entergy

Power, Inc. (EPI). Entergy Services states

that the TSA sets out the transmission

arrangements under which the Entergy

Operating Companies will provide EPI

non-firm transmission service under

Entergy Services Transmission Service

Tariff.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. American Electric Power Service

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–713–000]

Take notice that on March 8, 1995, the

American Electric Power Service

Corporation (AEPSC), tendered for

filing, as initial Rate Schedules,

Agreements dated December 1, 1994,

and January 1, 1995, between AEPSC, as

agent for the AEP System Operating

Companies and the following

companies: InterCoast Power Marketing

Company and CNG Power Services

Corporation (Marketers).

The Agreements provide the

Marketers access to the AEP System for

short-term transmission service. The

parties request an effective date of

March 9, 1995.

A copy of the filing was served upon

the state regulatory commissions of

Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio,

Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia,

and the Marketers.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–714–000]

Take notice that on March 8, 1995,

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

(O&R), tendered for filing an

amendment to § 3 of the Agreement

between Orange and Rockland Utilities,

Inc. and Long Island Lighting Company

(LILCO) dated April 27, 1976.

O&R states that a copy of this filing

has been served by mail upon LILCO.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–715–000]

Take notice that on March 8, 1995,

Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.

(Orange and Rockland), tendered for

filing an extension dated December 1,

1994, to an agreement between Orange

and Rockland and New York Power

Authority (Authority) for the sale of

system capacity and/or energy by

Orange and Rockland to Authority.

Orange and Rockland requests waiver

of the notice requirements of Part 35.3

of the Commission’s Regulations so that

the proposed rate schedule can be made

effective December 1, 1994 in

accordance with the anticipated

utilization by the parties.

Orange and Rockland states that a

copy of its filing was served on New

York Power Authority.

Comment date: April 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Gordonsville Energy, L.P. (Unit I and

Unit II)

[Docket Nos. QF92–166–005, QF92–167–005

and EL95–32–000]

Take notice that on March 10, 1995,

Gordonsville Energy, L.P.,

(Gordonsville) tendered for filing a

Petition For Temporary Waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of

1978 (PURPA). Gordonsville requests

the Commission to temporarily waive

the operating and efficiency standards

for qualifying cogenerating facilities as

set forth in Section 292.205, 18 CFR

292.205 of the Commission’s

Regulations implementing Section 201

of PURPA, as amended, with respect to

its cogeneration facilities located near

Gordonsville, Virginia. Specifically,

Gordonsville requests waiver of the

operating and efficiency standards for

the calendar years of 1994 and 1995.

Comment date: April 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Birchwood Power Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF93–126–001]

On March 13, 1995, Birchwood Power

Partners, L.P. (Applicant), of 900

Ashwood Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta,

Georgia 30338–4780, submitted for

filing an application for recertification

of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration

facility pursuant to Section 292.207(b)

of the Commission’s Regulations. No

determination has been made that the

submittal constitutes a complete filing.

According to Applicant, the toppingcycle cogeneration facility will be

located on Birchwood Drive, in

Sealston, Virginia. The Commission

previously certified the facility as a

qualifying cogeneration facility in

Birchwood Power Partners, L.P., 65

FERC ¶62,048 (1993). The instant

request for recertification is due to a

change in ownership of the facility.

Comment date: April 24, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–7309 Filed 3–23–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P