alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

Chance & Anthem, LLC,

 Debtor.

 /

Case No.: 18-16248-MAM

Chapter 7

Robert C. Furr,

 Plaintiff.

Adv. Proc. No. 19-1298-MAM

v.

Jeffrey M. Siskind, et al.

 Defendants.

 /

Jeffrey M. Siskind,

 Counter-Plaintiff.

v.

Genovese, Joblove & Battista, P.A., et al.

 Counter-Defendants.

 /

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 3, 2020.

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 351 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ENLARGMENT OF TIME 

TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 284]

THIS MATTER came before the Court on May 12, 2020 (the “Hearing”), upon

the Motion for Enlargement of Time to Conduct Discovery [ECF No. 284] (the 

“Motion”) filed by Jeffrey Siskind (“Siskind”). At the Hearing, Siskind represented on 

the record that he would withdraw the Motion. As of the date of entry of this Order, 

however, Siskind has failed to do so. 

Therefore, the Court, being otherwise fully advised in the premises, ORDERS

AND ADJUDGES that the Motion is DENIED.

###

Copy furnished to: 

Jeffrey M. Siskind, Esq.

Mr. Siskind is directed to serve this order upon all interested parties and file a conforming 

certificate of service.

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 351 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9888]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 6 p.m. on Sunday, 
April 19, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the 
Corporation's corporate activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), seconded by Acting Director John E. 
Bowman (Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director John C. 
Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which 
were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice 
to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; 
that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters 
in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be 
considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4) and 
(c)(8), of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) 
and (c)(8)).
    The meeting was held by means of a telephone conference call.

    Dated: April 24, 2009.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-9888 Filed 4-27-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Circuit Court for Cecil County

#07-K-00-000309

Argued April 7,2014

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

No. 80

September Term, 2013

 

DANNY C. HOSKINS 

 v.

 STATE OF MARYLAND

 

 

Barbera, C.J.,

Harrell

Battaglia

 Greene

Adkins

McDonald 

Watts,

 JJ.

 PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: April 8, 2014
DANNY C. HOSKINS * IN THE

 * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* No. 80

STATE OF MARYLAND * September Term, 2013

 PER CURIAM ORDER

 

This case having been argued before the Court in the April

Session of Court and upon consideration of the pleadings, papers,

briefs, and record extract, it is this 8 day of April, 2014, th

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion

to dismiss filed by the State be, and it is hereby, granted, it

being determined by the Court that the relief sought by

Petitioner/Appellant is not within the ambit of Section 8-201 of

the Criminal Procedure Article, and it is further 

ORDERED, that this case is remanded to the Court of Special

Appeals to consider the application for leave to appeal previously

filed in that Court.

 /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

 Chief Judge
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Quantifying uncertainty for remote spectroscopy of surface composition      

      May 30, 2020    

Remote surface measurements by imaging spectrometers play an important role in planetary and Earth science.To make these measurements, investigators calibrate instrument data to absolute units, invert physical models toestimate atmospheric effects, and then determine surface properties from the spectral reflectance. This studyquantifies the uncertainty in this process. Global missions demand predictive uncertainty models that can estimatefuture errors for varied environments and observing conditions. Here we validate uncertainty predictionswith remote surface composition retrievals and in situ measurements in a field analogue of Earth and planetaryexploration. We consider rover transects at Cuprite, Nevada, and remote observations by NASA's Next-Generation Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS-NG). We show that accounting for inputuncertainties can benefit mineral detection methods such as constrained spectrum fitting. This suggests thatoperational uncertainty estimates could improve future NASA missions like the Earth Mineral dust sourceInvesTigation (EMIT) and the Lunar Trailblazer mission, as well as NASA's Decadal Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) Investigation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Raymond Kokaly

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

Spectroscopy Lab

raymond@usgs.gov

303-236-1359

#### Gregg A Swayze, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

Spectroscopy Lab

gswayze@usgs.gov

303-236-0925

## Related Content

#### Raymond Kokaly

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

Spectroscopy Lab

raymond@usgs.gov

303-236-1359

#### Gregg A Swayze, Ph.D.

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

Spectroscopy Lab

gswayze@usgs.gov

303-236-0925

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Richard Ferguson certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of CoConnect, Inc. (formerly Advanced Wireless Communications, Inc.).  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  November 16, 2006
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Gary Schultheis, President and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Evolve
One, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Evolve One, Inc.

August 27, 2004

                                    By: /s/ Gary Schultheis
                                    Name: Gary Schultheis
                                    Title: President and Principal Financial
                                           and Accounting Officer
AAM-11-217-E 

March 23, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10229 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0228 

Mr. Roy Currier 

President 

Currier’s Flying Service, Inc. 

P.O. Box 351 

Greenville Junction, ME 04442 

Dear Mr. Currier: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated March 9, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Currier’s Flying Service, Inc. (Currier) for an exemption from § § 120.117(b)(2)(ii), 

(iii) and 225(b)(2)(ii), (iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent 

necessary to allow Currier, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover 

its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Currier. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Currier’s Flying Service, Inc. an exemption from 

14 CFR § § 120.117(b)(2)(ii), (iii) and 225(b)(2)(ii), (iii) to the extent necessary to allow 

Currier, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive 

employees under one drug and alcohol program, subject to the conditions and limitations 

described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Currier are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Currier part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3674 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to provide certain exemptions 

relating to the taking of migratory game birds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to provide certain 

exemptions relating to the taking of migratory game birds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Protection 

5 Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTIONS ON CERTAIN LAND. 

7 Section 3 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 704) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(c) EXEMPTIONS ON CERTAIN LAND.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3674 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section pro2 hibits the taking of any migratory game bird, includ3 ing waterfowl, coots, and cranes, on or over land 

4 that— 

5 ‘‘(A) is not a baited area; and 

6 ‘‘(B) contains— 

7 ‘‘(i) a standing crop or flooded stand8 ing crop, including an aquatic crop; 

9 ‘‘(ii) standing, flooded, or manipulated 

10 natural vegetation; 

11 ‘‘(iii) flooded harvested cropland; or 

12 ‘‘(iv) based on the determination of 

13 the applicable State office of the Coopera14 tive Extension System of the Department 

15 of Agriculture at the request of the Sec16 retary of the Interior, an area on which 

17 seed or grain has been scattered solely as 

18 the result of a normal agricultural plant19 ing, harvesting, post-harvest manipulation, 

20 or normal soil stabilization practice. 

21 ‘‘(2) DETERMINATIONS.— 

22 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of mak23 ing a determination under paragraph 

24 (1)(B)(iv), each State office of the Cooperative 

25 Extension System of the Department of AgriVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:22 Dec 13, 2012 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3674.IS S3674

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•S 3674 IS

1 culture shall determine the activities in that 

2 State that the State office considers to be a 

3 normal agricultural practice in the State, such 

4 as mowing, shredding, discing, rolling, chop5 ping, trampling, flattening, burning, or carrying 

6 out herbicide treatment. 

7 ‘‘(B) REVISIONS.—A State office may re8 vise a report described in subparagraph (A) as 

9 the State office determines to be necessary to 

10 reflect changing agricultural practices.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4836 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4836

      To require the United States to oppose the provision by the 
International Monetary Fund of a loan to a country whose public debt is 
    not likely to be sustainable in the medium term, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2016

   Mr. Huizenga of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To require the United States to oppose the provision by the 
International Monetary Fund of a loan to a country whose public debt is 
    not likely to be sustainable in the medium term, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO INTERNATIONAL MONETARY 
              FUND LOAN TO A COUNTRY WHOSE PUBLIC DEBT IS NOT LIKELY TO 
              BE SUSTAINABLE IN THE MEDIUM TERM.

    Section 68(a) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 
286tt(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting after the comma the 
        following: ``or a staff analytical report of the Fund states 
        that there is not a high probability that the public debt of 
        the country is sustainable in the medium term,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Presidential waiver authority.--The President of the 
        United States may waive paragraph (2) if the President provides 
        a written certification to the Committees on Financial Services 
        and on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committees on Foreign Relations and on Banking, Housing, and 
        Urban Affairs of the Senate that the waiver is important to the 
        national security interest of the United States, and includes 
        with the certification a written statement of the reasons 
        therefor.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

Third Revision to Engagement Letter dated March 21, 2000 between the Company and
ICE Holdings North America, L.L.C. dated December 22, 2000


22 December 2000

Andrew Smith,
ICE Securities North America LLC,
13th Floor - 645 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY, 10022

Dear Andrew:

Re:  Issuance of Warrants - Third Amendment to our letter agreement of March 21,
2000 (the "Letter Agreement")

Thank you for all of your work in arranging for Meditor to invest an additional
$2,000,000 in PCsupport.com.  Receipt of these funds marks the completion of the
Institutional Round described in the Letter Agreement.

In recognition of your services and efforts, we agree to amend item E of the
Letter Agreement as follows:

   1.  Of the second tranche of 250,000 warrants which we agreed to issue to ICE
       upon completion of the Institutional Round, all 250,000 warrants will be
       priced at $1.00.

   2.  Of the first tranche of 250,000 warrants issued pursuant to the
       Institutional Round, the warrants will remain priced at amounts between
       $1.00 and $1.50, as detailed in the Second Amendment to the Letter
       Agreement dated November 28, 2000.

All defined terms used in this letter that are not defined herein shall have the
meaning ascribed to them in the Letter Agreement.

Andrew, if this is acceptable to you, please indicate your approval by signing
below and returning to me.

Sincerely,

    /s/ David W. Rowat
  -----------------------

David W. Rowat,
Vice President and CFO
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Recent increases in atmospheric deposition of mercury to North-Central Wisconsin lakes inferred from sediment analyses      

      January 1, 1989    

Profiles of total mercury (Hg) concentrations in sediments were examined in 11 lakes in north-central  Wisconsin having a broad range of pH (5.1 to 7.8) and alkalinity (-12 to 769  μeq/L). Mercury concentrations  were greatest in the top 15 cm of the cores and were much lower in the deeper strata. The Hg content in the most  enriched stratum of individual cores ranged from 0.09 to 0.24  μg/g dry weight, whereas concentrations in  deep, precolonial strata ranged from 0.04 to 0.07  μg/g. Sediment enrichment factors varied from 0.8 to 2.8  and were not correlated with lake pH. The increase in the Hg content of recent sediments was attributed to increased atmospheric deposition of the metal. Eight of the 11 systems studied were low-alkalinity lakes that presumably received most (≥90%) of their hydrologic input from precipitation falling directly onto the lake surface. Thus, the sedimentary Hg in these lakes seems more likely linked to direct atmospheric deposition onto the lake surfaces than to influxes from the watershed. The data imply that a potentially significant fraction of the high Hg  burdens measured in game fish in certain lakes in north-central Wisconsin originated from atmospheric sources.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center          

2630 Fanta Reed RoadLa Crosse, WI54603United States

(608) 783-6451

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - wisconsin

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 22095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50504]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 1852


Indemnification Under Public Law 85-804

Correction

    In rule document 95-8511 beginning on page 18032 in the issue of 
Monday, April 10, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 18034, in the third column, the first bold line after 
amendatory instruction 8 should read as set forth below.


1852.250-70--  [Removed]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D