alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
a10a76.htm




Exhibit 10(a)76







PENSION EQUALIZATION PLAN


OF ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)







Certificate of Amendment







Amendment No. 2







THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this 15th day of December, 2011, but made effective January 27, 2011, constitutes the Second Amendment of the Pension Equalization Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) (the “Plan”).







All capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan unless otherwise herein defined.







Pursuant to Section 8.01 of the Plan and in accordance with the Resolutions of the Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors adopted at its meeting of January 27, 2011, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:








	
1.  

	
The last sentence of Plan Section 1.01 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:












Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term “Administrator” shall for Plan administrative purposes include the office of the senior-most System officer with responsibility for Human Resources and Administration, to whom the Personnel Committee has delegated the authority to act on its behalf with respect to all Plan administrative matters.








	
2.  

	
Plan Section 1.28 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:













	
  

	
1.28

	
“Supplemental Credited Service” shall mean additional service the senior-most System officer with responsibility for Human Resources and Administration, in consultation with the Employer and in their sole discretion, may grant to a Participant in computing his benefit service (but for no other purposes unless specifically approved as above and set forth in the Participant Application) under this Plan after consideration of Participant’s prior service with utilities, utility service companies, or other employment considered to be helpful in Participant’s work with a System Company as specifically set forth in and evidenced by the Participant Application.



















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Personnel Committee has caused this Second Amendment to the Pension Equalization Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) to be executed by its duly authorized representative on the day, month, and year above set forth, but effective January 27, 2011.







ENTERGY CORPORATION


PERSONNEL COMMITTEE


through the undersigned duly authorized representative







 



/s/ E. Renae Conley




E. Renae Conley


Executive Vice-President,


Human Resources and Administration
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-2 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-2 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-2 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-2 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-2 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 141 (Monday, July 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 37923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30724]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 67 and 68

[CGD 95-014]
RIN 2115-AF05


Centralization of Vessel Documentation Offices

Correction

    In rule document 95-14553 beginning on page 31602 in the issue of 
Thursday, June 15, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 67.115  [Corrected]

    1. On page 31604, in the first column, the heading for amendatory 
instruction 9. ``Sec. 6.117 [Removed]'' should read ``Sec. 67.115 
[Removed]''.


Sec. 67.117  [Corrected]

    2. On the same page, in the same column, the heading for amendatory 
instruction 10. should be added to read ``Sec. 67.117 [Amended]''.


Sec. 67.147  [Corrected]

    3. On the same page, in the third column, the heading for 
amendatory instruction 16. ``Sec. 67.147 [Amended]'' should read 
``Sec. 67.147 [Removed]''.


Sec. 67.321  [Corrected]

    4. On page 31605, in the third column, the heading for amendatory 
instruction 36. ``Sec. 67.32 [Amended]'' should read ``Sec. 67.321 
[Amended]''.

Appendix A to Part 67  [Corrected]

    5. On the same page, in the same column, the heading for amendatory 
instruction 40. ``Appendix A to Part 67 [Amended]'' should read 
``Appendix A to Part 67 [Removed]''.


Sec. 68.01-5  [Corrected]

    6. On the same page, in the same column, the heading for amendatory 
instruction 42. ``Sec. 68.01-7 [Amended]'' should read ``Sec. 68.01-5 
[Amended]''.


Sec. 68.01-7  [Corrected]

    7. On the same page, in the same column, the heading for amendatory 
instruction 43. ``Sec. 65.01-7 [Amended]'' should read ``Sec. 68.01-7 
[Amended]''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 285TH JUDICIA L DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETI NGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on June 1, 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Brian McEnery, Appellant

V.

City of San Antonio and Chief Charles N. Hood, Appellee

No. 04

- 15

- 00097

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- CI

- 06603

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

We order that appel lees City of San Antonio and Chief Charles N. Hood recover their costs of appeal from appellant Brian McEnery.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on August 11, 2016

.
KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 15

- 00097

- CV

Brian McEnery

v.

City of S an Antonio and Chief Charles N. Hood

(NO. 2011

- CI

- 06603 IN 285 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUN TY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY
MOTION FEE MOTION FEE MOTION FEE MOTION FEE MOTION FEE MOTION FEE MOTION FEE REPORTER'S RECORD MOTION FEE CLERK'S RECORD INDIGENT FILING SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE STATEWIDE EFILING FE E $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $1,241.25 $10.00 $1,491.00 $25.00 $100.00

$50.00 $20.00 E

- PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID PAID E

- PAID PAID E

- PAID E

- PAID

E

- P AID E

- PAID FLOYD S. CONTRERAS FLOYD CONTRERAS JACQUELINE STROH JACQUELINE STROH FLOYD CONTRERAS FLOYD S CONTRERAS FLOYD S CONTRERAS

JACQUELINE STROH

FLOYD S CONTRERAS FLOYD S CONTRERAS

FLOYD S CONTRERAS FLOYD S CONTRERAS

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE
, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and f oregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, w itness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this August 11, 2016

.

KEITH E . HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3612 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3612

 To prohibit the payment of surcharges for commemorative coin programs 
     to private organizations or entities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2012

 Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
 Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Risch) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                 on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the payment of surcharges for commemorative coin programs 
     to private organizations or entities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commemorative Coins Reform Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PAYMENT OF SURCHARGES TO NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES.

    Section 5134(f) of title 31, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(f) Prohibition on Payment of Surcharges to Organizations Outside 
of the Federal Government.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, no surcharges collected with respect to the sale of any 
        numismatic item may be paid to any organization outside of the 
        Federal Government, other than with respect to the costs of 
        producing and selling such item.
            ``(2) Payment of costs.--Surcharges collected in connection 
        with the sale of any numismatic item shall be used to recover 
        all numismatic operation and program costs allocable to the 
        program under which such numismatic item is produced and sold.
            ``(3) Excess deposited into treasury.--Amounts of 
        surcharges collected in excess of the amounts described in 
        paragraph (2) shall be transferred by the Fund to the general 
        fund of the Treasury for the purpose of deficit reduction.''.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    Subsection (f) of section 5134, United States Code, as amended by 
this Act, shall apply with respect to any commemorative coin program 
established or numismatic item produced pursuant to an Act enacted on 
or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Processing of multichannel seismic reflection data acquired in 2013 for seismic investigations of gas hydrates in the Gulf of Mexico      

      April 13, 2016    

View Report

As part of a cooperative effort among the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, two grids of two-dimensional multichannel seismic reflection data were acquired in the Gulf of Mexico over lease blocks Green Canyon 955 and Walker Ridge 313 between April 18 and May 3, 2013. The purpose of the data acquisition was to fill knowledge gaps in an ongoing study of known gas hydrate accumulations in the area. These data were initially processed onboard the recording ship R/V Pelican for more quality control during the recording. The data were subsequently processed in detail by the U.S. Geological Survey in Denver, Colorado, in two phases. The first phase was to create a “kinematic” dataset that removed extensive noise present in the data but did not preserve relative amplitudes. The second phase was to create a true relative amplitude dataset that included noise removal and “wavelet” deconvolution that preserved the amplitude information. This report describes the processing techniques used to create both datasets.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### John J Miller

##### Scientist Emeritus

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jmiller@usgs.gov

303-236-5752

#### Seth Haines

##### Research Geophysicist

Central Energy Resources Science Center

shaines@usgs.gov

303-236-5709

#### Patrick Hart

##### Geophysicist Emeritus

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

hart@usgs.gov

831-460-7408

## Related Content

#### John J Miller

##### Scientist Emeritus

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jmiller@usgs.gov

303-236-5752

#### Seth Haines

##### Research Geophysicist

Central Energy Resources Science Center

shaines@usgs.gov

303-236-5709

#### Patrick Hart

##### Geophysicist Emeritus

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

hart@usgs.gov

831-460-7408

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Central Energy Resources Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBldg. 25Denver, CO80225United States

### Explore Search

                  - Gulf of Mexico

View All **
T.D.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph SEEBER, Superintendent, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus is denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      August 13, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Liu BoLiu
      Bo
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  (principal
      executive officer)
Travis VELSOR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 04, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

53830

Vol. 60, No. 200

Tuesday, October 17, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 107 and 108

[Docket No. 26763; Amendment Nos. 107-

7, 108-12]

RIN2120-AE14

Unescorted Access Privilege

Correction

In rule document 95–24546 beginning

on page 51854 in the issue of Tuesday,

October 3, 1995 make the following

corrections:

1. On page 51861, middle column,

fourteenth line, ’’suggest’’ should read

’’suggests’’.

2. On page 51865, third column, last

paragraph, sixth line, ’’1995’’ should

read ’’1996’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUNAWAN MAKMURI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74224

Agency No. A072-403-972

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Gunawan Makmuri, native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s 

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

FILED

SEP 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74224

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. INS v.

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 & n.1 (1992). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that, even if Makmuri is

credible, he failed to demonstrate the incidents he suffered constituted past

persecution. See Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2004) (no

evidence the petitioner was robbed on account of his race as opposed to his

carrying expensive items); Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1059 (9th Cir.

2009) (being “beaten by youths and robbed of . . . sandals and pocket money . . .

and being accosted by a threatening mob” were instances of “discriminatory

mistreatment.”). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that

Makmuri failed to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution because,

even as a member of a disfavored group of Chinese Christians, he did not show he

faced an individualized risk of persecution. Cf. Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922,

927-29 (9th Cir. 2004). Further, the record does not compel the conclusion that

there is a pattern or practice of persecution against Chinese Christians in Indonesia. 

See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1060-62. Further, contrary to Makmuri’s contention, the

record shows that the IJ adequately considered the reports on country conditions. 

Accordingly, his asylum claim fails. 
3 07-74224

Because Makmuri failed to meet the lower burden of proof for asylum, it

follows that he has not met the higher standard for withholding of removal. See

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Finally, the record does not compel the conclusion it is more likely than not

that Makmuri will be tortured if he returns to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at

1068. Accordingly, Makmuri’s CAT claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary aeromagnetic, gravity, and generalized geologic maps of the USGS basin and range-Colorado Plateau transit zone study area in southwestern Utah, southeastern Nevada, and northwestern Arizona (the "BARCO" project)      

      January 1, 1989    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado Plateau
                  - Arizona
                  -  Neveda
                  -  Utah

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30811]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 227

[Defense Acquisition Circular (DAC) 91-8]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Rights in 
Technical Data

Correction

    In rule document 95-15251 beginning on page 33464 in the issue of 
Wednesday, June 28, 1995, make the following corrction:


227.7103-6  [Corrected]

    On page 33475, in the second column, in section 227.7103-6(b)(2), 
remove ``Facilitated by the Government; and''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50918]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-34081; FRL 4972-4]


Certain Chemicals; Availability of Reregistration Eligibility 
Decision Documents for Comment

Correction

    In notice document 95-22055 beginning on page 46278 in the issue of 
Wednesday, September 6, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 46278, in the second column, in the DATES section, in the 
second and third lines ``October 6, 1995'' should read ``November 6, 
1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

LaBranche & Co Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-76928 and 333-73212) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements (No. 333-44464, 333-57090 and 333- 102607) on Form S-8 of LaBranche & Co Inc. of our report datedMarch 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial condition of LaBranche & Co Inc. as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity andcomprehensive loss, and cash flows, for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2007 and for each of the years in the two-year period endedDecember 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of LaBranche & Co Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York 

March 16, 2009