alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael Schaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/ Michael Schaffer

/s/ Lawrence SchafferBy: Michael Schaffer

Chief Executive Officer

August 23, 2010

By: Lawrence Schaffer

Chief Financial Officer

August 23, 2010
Gerald NAICO, Appellant, v. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3098

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 20-10016-EPK Doc 59 Filed 04/06/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 20-10016-EPK Doc 59 Filed 04/06/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 20-10016-EPK Doc 59 Filed 04/06/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 20-10016-EPK Doc 59 Filed 04/06/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 20-10016-EPK Doc 59 Filed 04/06/20 Page 5 of 5
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Introduction: Geomorphic studies of the storm and flood of November 3-5, 1985, in the upper Potomac and Cheat River basins      

      June 16, 1993    

The heavy rains of November 3-5, 1985, produced record floods and extensive landsliding in the Potomac and Cheat River basins in West Virginia and Virginia (pl. 1). Although rainfall intensity was moderate, the storm covered a very large area and produced record floods for basins in the size range of 1000-10,000 km2. In addition, thousands of landslides were triggered on slopes underlain by shale bedrock. The total social cost of the storm amounted to 70 lives lost and an estimated $1.3 billion in damage to homes, businesses, roads, and productive land in West Virginia and Virginia (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 1985a, b). These extreme costs were incurred despite the fact that the affected area is sparsely populated. 

To understand the origins and geomorphic effects of the 1985 storm, studies were undertaken by the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Maryland, West Virginia University, Cornell University, University of Virginia, The Johns Hopkins University, and Carleton College. Personnel were also consulted from the National Weather Service, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Soil Conservation Service, and Interstate Commission on the Potomac River basin. 

This cooperative effort serves to document the effects of the storm as an example of an extreme geomorphic event in the central Appalachian Mountains. The following chapters comprise observations and preliminary analyses for some of the observed phenomena. Subsequent publications by the contributors to this volume will expand the scope of this research. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Robert Jacobson, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Supervisory Research Hydrologist

Columbia Environmental Research Center

## Related Content

####             Robert Jacobson, PhD (Former Employee)          

##### Supervisory Research Hydrologist

Columbia Environmental Research Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Columbia Environmental Research Center          

4200 New Haven RoadColumbia, MO65201-8709United States

573-875-5399 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Cheat River basin
                  -  upper Potomac River basin
                  - Virginia
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
$40"4/7 4.

Douglas 

, J. 

Saitta 

Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433 

(1987) (noting that an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in 

this court). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

cc: Hon. Deborah Schumacher, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Pearl E.S. 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
CGFD47 (12/1/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−24331−JKO

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Ralph Levi Sanders Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

SSN: xxx−xx−6171

NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO COMPLETE A POSTPETITION

INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE CONCERNING PERSONAL FINANCIAL

MANAGEMENT AND SUBMIT PROOF OF COMPLETION

OF THE COURSE TO THE COURT

 Notice is given that, subject to limited exceptions, a debtor (both debtors in a joint case) must

complete an instructional course in personal financial management in order to receive a discharge under

chapter 7 [11 U.S.C. §727(a)(11)], under chapter 13 [11 U.S.C. §1328(g)(1)] or, in certain individual

chapter 11 cases where 11 U.S.C. §1141(d)(3) applies. Proof of completion of the course must be

submitted to the court by either the debtor or the course provider on behalf of the debtor.

DEBTOR AND DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT:

 If the course provider has not filed a certificate with the court directly indicating that the debtor has

completed the course, the debtor must file the "Certification About a Financial Management Course",

(Official Bankruptcy Form 423):

 In a chapter 7 case: within 60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under §341.

[See Bankruptcy Rules 1007(b)(7)(A) and (c).]

 In a chapter 13 case: no later than the date of the last payment made as required by the plan or the

filing of a motion for entry of a discharge under §1328(b). [See Bankruptcy Rules 1007(b)(7)(A) and (c).]

 In a chapter 11 individual case where 11 U.S.C. §1141(d)(3) applies: prior to completion of all

payments under the confirmed plan. [See Bankruptcy Rules 1007(b)(7)(B) and (c).]

 This requirement must be met before a discharge can be entered in this case. [See Bankruptcy Rule

4004(c)(1)(H) and Local Rule 4004−3(A).]

 Failure to file the Official Bankruptcy Form 423 certification form, unless the course provider files a

certificate on your behalf, may result in the case being closed without an entry of discharge.

 If the debtor subsequently files a motion to reopen the case to permit the filing of the Official

Bankruptcy Form 423, the debtor must pay the filing fee due for reopening the case. [See Local Rules

4006−1 and 5010−1(G).]

 A list of approved providers of Personal Finanical Management Courses is available at:

http://www.justice.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/de_approved.htm [see 11 U.S.C. §111]

Dated: 12/25/19 CLERK OF COURT

By: admin

Deputy Clerk

The clerk shall serve a copy of this notice on the Debtor and Attorney for the Debtor

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 24 Filed 12/25/19 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4804 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4804

    To provide for a task force within the FBI to deal with certain 
 malicious and false threats in order made to obtain a response by law 
                  enforcement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2016

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for a task force within the FBI to deal with certain 
 malicious and false threats in order made to obtain a response by law 
                  enforcement, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Swatting in Our Schools Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. TASK FORCE TO PREVENT SWATTING.

    (a) Creation.--The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
shall create a Task Force to combat swatting by investigating and 
referring for prosecution Federal offenses involved in this activity.
    (b) Definition of Swatting.--The term ``swatting'' means activity 
of individuals who through the use of the mail, telephone, or other 
instrument of interstate or foreign commerce, or in or affecting 
interstate or foreign commerce, willfully makes any threat, or 
maliciously conveys false information knowing the same to be false, 
concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made, or to be made, to 
kill, injure, or intimidate any individual or unlawfully to damage or 
destroy any building, vehicle, or other real or personal property by 
means of fire or an explosive with the intent to trigger a response by 
a law enforcement agency in the absence of circumstances requiring such 
a response.
    (c) Swatting Considered Domestic Terrorism.--For the purposes of 
its activities, the Task Force created under this section shall deem 
swatting to be a form of domestic terrorism.
    (d) Coordination With the Joint Terrorism Task Forces.--The task 
force created under this section shall coordinate its activities with 
the Joint Terrorism Task Forces.
    (e) Authorization.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
carry out this section such sums as may be necessary.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetic studies of the Florida peninsula      

      September 17, 1940    

This investigation was undertaken primarily as a pilot‐experiment for gaining information concerning the field‐technique and accuracy which is needed for covering large areas in detail and at the same time economically. Owing to the complex nature of magnetic observations, such a pilot‐study serves, in addition, as a basis for determining the best methods of presenting the results of large areal studies in an easily comprehensible form. The State of Florida was chosen for such preliminary study for the following reasons: First, because it is geologically ideal for such an investigation since it comprises a series of unconsolidated, flat‐lying, Tertiary and Cretaceous sediments of low magnetic permeability covering a complex and much‐folded crystalline basement composed largely of rocks carrying strongly paramagnetic materials; secondly, because information concerning the structural trends of the crystalline basement would be of great interest and importance in the study of Appalachian orogeny and the relationship of the Florida Peninsula to both the Appalachian and Antillean tectonic systems.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Florida

View All **
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 10, 2009,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: May 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Samuel ShengSamuel ShengChief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30920]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 400 and 411

[BPD-482-FC]
RIN 0938-AD73


Medicare Program; Medicare Secondary Payer for Individuals 
Entitled to Medicare and Also Covered Under Group Health Plans

Correction

    In rule document 95-21265 beginning on page 45344 in the issue of 
Thursday, August 31, 1995, in the second column, under DATES, beginning 
in the second line, ``October 2, 1995'' should read ``September 29, 
1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF B. GRANT HUNTER

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, B. Grant Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ B. Grant Hunter
--------------------------------
B. Grant Hunter
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-100113]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Docket No. AB-3 (Sub-No. 115)]


Missouri Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment--in Miami, 
Franklin, and Osage Counties, KS; Notice

Correction

    In notice document 94-31998 appearing on page 67719 in the issue of 
Friday, December 30, 1994 the docket number should read as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6875

DANA MARVIN HOLLOMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-169-AM) Submitted: October 3, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dana Marvin Holloman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dana Marvin Holloman seeks to appeal the district court’sorder dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as timebarred under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holloman has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4777 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, Alabama as the ‘‘Amelia Boynton 

Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Ms. SEWELL of Alabama (for herself, Mr. BYRNE, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. ROGERS

of Alabama, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, and Mr. PALMER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, Alabama 

as the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMELIA BOYNTON ROBINSON POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1301 Alabama Avenue in Selma, 

7 Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Amelia 

8 Boynton Robinson Post Office Building’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4777 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Amelia Boynton Rob5 inson Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 24, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20A0219. JESUS GARIBAY v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On September 13, 2019, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than September 23, 2019. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 24, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           MTBE concentrations in ground water in Pennsylvania      

      January 1, 2003    

View Report

The distribution, concentrations, and detection frequency of methyl tert-butyl-ether (MTBE), a gasoline additive used in reformulated gasoline to improve air quality, were characterized in Pennsylvania's ground water. Two sources of MTBE in ground water, the atmosphere and storage-tank release sites, were examined. An analysis of atmospheric MTBE concentrations shows that MTBE detections (MTBE greater than or equal to 0.2 micrograms per liter) in ground water are more likely the result of storage-tank releases than atmospheric deposition. A comparison of 86 ground-water samples near storage-tank releases and 359 samples from ambient ground water (not thought to be affected by point-source releases of MTBE or BTEX compounds) shows that samples within about 0.5 mile downgradient of storagetank release sites have significantly greater MTBE detection frequency than ambient ground-water samples.

Aquifer type, land use, and the use of Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) are associated with high rates of occurrence of MTBE in ground water in Pennsylvania. Ground-water samples from wells in crystalline-rock aquifers near storage- tank release sites have a significantly greater MTBE detection frequency (57 percent) compared to other aquifers. Samples from wells in urban areas have a significantly greater MTBE detection frequency compared to ambient samples in agricultural and forested areas. Samples from the RFG-use areas in the five southeastern counties of Pennsylvania have a significantly greater MTBE detection frequency than samples outside of the RFG-use area. MTBE detection frequency of samples near storage-tank release sites in the RFG-use area (45 percent) are significantly greater than ambient samples in the RFG-use area.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pennsylvania Water Science Center          

215 Limekiln RoadNew Cumberland, PA17070United States

717-730-6900 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pennsylvania

View All **
Jeffery L. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.