alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Managing habitat to slow or reverse population declines of the Columbia spotted frog in the Northern Great Basin      

      April 1, 2015    

Evaluating the effectiveness of habitat management actions is critical to adaptive management strategies for conservation of imperiled species. We quantified the response of a Great Basin population of the Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris) to multiple habitat improvement actions aimed to reduce threats and reverse population declines. We used mark-recapture data for 1,394 adult frogs that had been marked by state, federal, and university biologists in 9 ponds representing a single population over a 16-year period from 1997 to 2012. With the use of demographic models, we assessed population-level effects of 1) a grazing exclosure constructed around 6 stock ponds that had been used to water livestock for decades before being fully fenced in 2003, and 2) the construction of 3 new stock ponds in 2003 to provide alternative water sources for livestock and, secondarily, to provide additional frog habitat. These management actions were implemented in response to a decline of more than 80% in population size from 1997 to 2002. We found evidence that excluding cattle from ponds and surrounding riparian habitats resulted in higher levels of frog production (more egg masses), higher adult frog recruitment and survival, and higher population growth rate. We also found that frogs colonized the newly constructed stock ponds within 3 years and frogs began breeding in 2 of them after 5 years. The positive effects of the cattle exclosure and additional production from the new ponds, although notable, did not result in full recovery of the population even 9 years later. This slow recovery may be partly explained by the effects of weather on recruitment rates, particularly the negative effects of harsher winters with late springs and higher fall temperatures. Although our findings point to potential successes of habitat management aimed at slowing or reversing rapidly declining frog populations, our study also suggests that recovering from severe population declines can take many years because of demographic and environmental processes. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Sam Noble Springs
                  - Idaho

View All **
Jose APOINTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, as Owner Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0014

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson                                  
|                    |  |  |  |                                                        
|                    |  |  |  | Rodger L. Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

                  CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Viador Inc:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 26, 2001, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2000, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, included in the annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.  This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our
audits.  In our opinion, based on our audits, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-
91805) on Form S-8 of Viador Inc of our report dated March 26, 2001, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Viador Inc and subsidiary as of December
31, 2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, and all related schedule, which report appears
in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Viador Inc.

                                                      /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
March 30, 2001
Sanitized – Attachment 011 Page 1 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 011 Page 2 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 011 Page 3 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 011 Page 4 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 011 Page 5 of 6Sanitized – Attachment 011 Page 6 of 6
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Potential effects of large floods on the transport of atrazine into the alluvial aquifer adjacent to the lower Platte River, Nebraska      

      January 1, 1997    

View Document

No abstract available. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jill D. Frankforter

##### Center Director

Nevada Water Science Center

jdfrankf@usgs.gov

775-887-7658

## Related Content

#### Jill D. Frankforter

##### Center Director

Nevada Water Science Center

jdfrankf@usgs.gov

775-887-7658

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Wyoming-Montana Water Science Center - Helena Office          

3162 Bozeman AvenueHelena, MT59601United States

(406) 457-5900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Platte River
                  - Nebraska

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 16147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10329]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Caroline Bembry, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting
officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Caroline Bembry    
|                         |  |     |  | Caroline Bembry        
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed to be a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 17, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10258

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL SCOTT TOWNSEND,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 1:05-CR-65

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Townsend

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
No. 06-10258

2

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Townsend has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case 19-01416-RAM Doc 21 Filed 02/11/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-01416-RAM Doc 21 Filed 02/11/20 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was e-mailed to James B.

Miller, attorney for the Plaintiff/Trustee at jbm@Title11Law.com on this February 11, 2020.

/s/

Rex E. Russo

Case 19-01416-RAM Doc 21 Filed 02/11/20 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

RALPH LEVI SANDERS JR CASE NO. 19-24331-JKO

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

_______________________________/

OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN 

Creditor, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, as servicing agent for The Bank of New York 

Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as 

Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-SD2, Asset-Backed Certificates, 

Series 2006-SD2, files its Objection to Confirmation of Plan and states:

1. Creditor holds a note secured by a mortgage on the property located at 561 SW 60 

Avenue, Plantation, Florida 33317.

2. Creditor is in the process of timely filing a Proof of Claim in the estimated amount 

of $434,290.46, including a secured arrearage of $212,115.57.

3. Debtor’s Plan indicates an intention to mediate with Creditor through the Loss 

Mitigation Mediation Program; however, an appropriate motion has not been filed, as of the date 

of this Objection. 

4. If a mediation commences and results in an impasse or denial of the modification 

application, Creditor’s Proof of Claim should be in paid in full or the property surrendered. 

5. Moreover, Debtor’s Plan should account for future taxes and insurance during the

pendency of the potential mediation. 

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 22 Filed 11/29/19 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, Creditor respectfully requests the Court sustain this Objection and for 

such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Creditor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by CM/ECF notice 

and first class mail this 29th day of November, 2019.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Ralph Levi Sanders, Jr. 

561 SW 60 Ave. 

Plantation, FL 33317 

VIA CM/ECF NOTIFICATION

Michael H. Johnson 

3601 W. Commercial Blvd. #31 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

Robin R Weiner 

POB 559007 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355 

U.S. Trustee

Office of the US Trustee 

51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

Suite 1204 

Miami, FL 33130

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 22 Filed 11/29/19 Page 2 of 2
Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 19-1 Filed 10/11/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 19-1 Filed 10/11/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 19-1 Filed 10/11/19 Page 3 of 3
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10510]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Interagency report; Astrogeology 59, Geologic maps and terrain analysis data for Viking Mars 1975 landing sites considered in December 1972      

      January 1, 1976    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Dean Becker certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CoConnect, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Dean Becker Dean Becker, Chief Finanical Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  April 17, 2007
No. 90-179 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1991

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. ROBERT E. HOWARD, Defendant and Appellant. 

### MAR

### 221991

CLERKOFSUPREMECOURT STATEOF MONTANA

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, In and for the County of Richland, The Honorable Dale Cox, Judgepresiding.

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: J. Douglas Alexander, Sidney, Montana For Respondent: Marc Racicot,Attorney General,Joseph 

### E. Thaggard, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana Phillip N. Carter, Deputy County Attorney, Sidney, Montana

Filed: Submitted on Briefs: January 17, 1991 Decided: March 21, 1991

# .. p' 

# .. -I Justice William E. Hunt, Sr. delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Defendant,Robert E. Howard,was convictedby a juryempaneled in the Seventh Judicial District Court, Richland County, of one count of felony sexual assault. From this conviction,he appeals. We affirm. The sole issue is whether the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of the complaining witness. Defendantwas charged by information with the felony offense of sexual assault pursuant to 5 45-5-502, MCA. The information alleged that defendant committed the offense by making sexual contact with A.D., a nine-year-old girl. A.D. was 10 years of age when she testified at trial. At the beginning of her testimony, the State laid a foundation regarding her ability to understand the truth. After laying the foundation, the StatequestionedA.D. about the substantive issues in the case. Defendant did not at any time object to A.D. s competence to act as a witness. On appeal, defendant claims that A.D. was incompetent to testify at trial. We hold that defendant waived any right to appeal this issue because he failed to object to the witness's competency during trial. Section 46-20-104(2), MCA. Affirmed. Let remittitur issue forthwith. See Rules 34 and 35,M.R.App.P. Pursuant to 

### 5 I, Par. 3

### (c)

## , Montana Supreme Court 1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and shallbe published by its filingas a public document

# -. ** -4 -c with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its result toWest Publishing Company.

WeConcur:
Darrell Jerome BURNSIDE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2872

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUSTIN JUAN JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 354 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARKS


 


 


THIS ASSIGNMENT is made as of
the 1st day of March, 2012 by and between American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation with an address of 405 Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10022 (the “Assignor”) on the one hand, and AR Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
with an address of 405 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022 (the “Assignee”) on the other hand.


WHEREAS, the Assignor is the owner
of the following trademarks and trademark applications:


AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL – SN 85/004512


AR CAPITAL & design – Reg.
No. 3,884,743


AR CAPITAL – SN 85/553569


(collectively, along with the goodwill
symbolized thereby, the “Trademarks”);


WHEREAS, the Assignee owns and
operates the business to which the Trademarks pertain; and


WHEREAS, the Assignor wishes to
sell and assign, and the Assignee wishes to purchase and assume, the Trademarks;


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby severally acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


		1.	Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to, and under the Trademarks, including
all registrations and applications therefor, together with the goodwill associated therewith.



		2.	The Assignor further grants to the Assignee the right to recover damages and all other relief for all infringements of the
Trademarks that have occurred prior to the date of this Assignment with the right to sue for and collect the same, for Assignee’s
own use and enjoyment and for the use and enjoyment of its successors, assigns or other legal representatives, free and clear of
all liens, claims, charges, security interests, and other encumbrances.



		3.	The total consideration for the Trademarks and the other rights granted to Assignee pursuant to this Assignment is $10.00,
payable in cash, by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated by the Assignor.







 ****



    	



    	 



    





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor and
the Assignee have executed this Assignment as of the date first above written.


	ASSIGNOR:	ASSIGNEE:
	AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL TRUST, INC.	AR CAPITAL, LLC
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By: /s/ William M. Kahane                                 	By: /s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch                    
	 	 
	Name: William M. Kahane                                  	Name:
Nicholas S. Schorsch                     
	 	 
	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer      	Title: Manager
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED \
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending July 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Simcha Edell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the
following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Simcha Edell
----------------------------
Simcha Edell
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2006
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board
of Directors

TiVo Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-146156, 333-113719, 333-112836, 333-106731, 333-103002, 333-100894, 333-92028, and 333-69530) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-94629,
333-69512, 333-101045, 333-106251, 333-112838, 333-135754, 333-146998, 333-153178, 333-153179, and 333-163618) of TiVo Inc. of our reports dated March 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TiVo Inc. and subsidiaries as of
January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income/loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2010, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, which reports appear herein.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP             
|                         
|Mountain View, California
|                         
|March 31, 2010