alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004322EN.01000301.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1838/2004

of 22 October 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in skimmed-milk powder

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 (2) limited the quantity of skimmed-milk powder put up for sale by the Member States' intervention agencies to that taken into storage before 1 July 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 (2) limited the quantity of skimmed-milk powder put up for sale by the Member States' intervention agencies to that taken into storage before 1 July 2003.

| (2) | In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 September 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 September 2004.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 214/2001, ‘1 July 2003’ is replaced by ‘1 September 2004’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 37, 7.2.2001, p. 100. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1675/2004 (OJ L 300, 25.9.2004, p. 12).

2

---
# L_2004246EN.01003401.xml

| 20.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/34

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2004 of 15 July 2004 laying down the reduction coefficient to be applied under the tariff quota for corn opened by Regulation (EC) No 958/2003

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 244 of 16 July 2004
  )

In the contents, and on page 21, in the title, in the first recital and in Article 1:

for:

‘...corn ...’,

read:

‘... wheat ...’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3088 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3088

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on filament tow of rayon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on filament tow of rayon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FILAMENT TOW OF RAYON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.27 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to filament tow of rayon) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Brian Frederick LUCAS v. STATE

CR-15-1204

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

Reh. denied.
Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 131    Filed 05/21/21    Page 1 of 2

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 131    Filed 05/21/21    Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling migratory energetics of Connecticut River American shad (*Alosa sapidissima*): implications for the conservation of an iteroparous anadromous fish      

      January 1, 2010    

We present a simulation model in which individual adult migrant American shad (Alosa sapidissima) ascend the Connecticut River and spawn, and survivors return to the marine environment. Our approach synthesizes bioenergetics, reproductive biology, and behavior to estimate the effects of migratory distance and delays incurred at dams on spawning success and survival. We quantified both the magnitude of effects and the consequences of uncertainty in the estimates of input variables. Behavior, physiology, and energetics strongly affected both the distribution of spawning effort and survival to the marine environment. Delays to both upstream and downstream movements had dramatic effects on spawning success, determining total fecundity and spatial extent of spawning. Delays, combined with cues for migratory reversal, also determined the likelihood of survival. Spawning was concentrated in the immediate vicinity of dams and increased with greater migratory distance and delays to downstream migration. More research is needed on reproductive biology, behavior, energetics, and barrier effects to adequately understand the interplay of the various components of this model; it does provide a framework, however, that suggests that provision of upstream passage at dams in the absence of expeditious downstream passage may increase spawning success — but at the expense of reduced iteroparity. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Theodore Castro-Santos

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

tcastrosantos@usgs.gov

413-863-3838

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

## Related Content

#### Theodore Castro-Santos

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

tcastrosantos@usgs.gov

413-863-3838

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - connecticut river
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  Vermont

View All **
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00 596

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E OVIDIO GARCIA JR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

Relator

, Ovidio Garcia Jr., proceeding pro se, f iled a petition for writ of mandamus

in the above cause on December 17 , 2015

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator

seeks to compel the assigned judge to set a hearing on relator’s motion to recuse the trial

court judge and to issue a ruling thereon.

T he Court requests that the real part ies in interest , Omar Escobar, et al., or any

others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to

the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of

this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e

21st day of December , 201 5

.
Case 19-25780-MAM    Doc 1    Filed 11/22/19    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-25780-MAM    Doc 1    Filed 11/22/19    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-25780-MAM    Doc 1    Filed 11/22/19    Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-038)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Advisory Board. The agenda for the meeting includes updates from each of the three PNT Panels (Leadership, Strategic Engagement and Communication, Future Challenges), including discussion and deliberation of potential recommendations. The PNT Advisory Board will address U.S. Government interests in the following areas:
      - Implementation of the President's 2004 U.S. Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing Policy.
      - National Space-Based PNT Executive Committee, and National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
      - Global Positioning System (GPS) Constellation and Modernization Plans.
      - U.S. GPS Technological Leadership and Competitiveness.
      - Promoting and Branding Current and Future PNT Capabilities to the U.S. and International Communities.
      - Global Technical and Market Trends for PNT Services.
      - Future Areas of Study.

# DATES:

Thursday, May 14, 2009, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.; Friday, May 15, 2009, 9 a.m.-1 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Embassy Suites Hotel at Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015-2020, phone: 202-362-9300.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. James J. Miller, Space Operations Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 20546. Phone 202-358-4417.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Dated: April 24, 2009.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-9880 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4703 

To eliminate the authority of the executive branch to further restrict intrafamily firearm transfers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2016 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To eliminate the authority of the executive branch to further 

restrict intra-family firearm transfers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Firearm Pro5 tection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY TO FUR7 THER RESTRICT INTRA-FAMILY FIREARM 

8 TRANSFERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—No officer or employee of the Fed10 eral Government may take any action that would result 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4703 IH

1 in a limitation on the transfer of a firearm between mem2 bers of the same family, including by way of inheritance, 

3 that is more restrictive than the limitations on the conduct 

4 that are in effect as of January 3, 2016. 

5 (b) FAMILY DEFINED.—For purposes of subsection 

6 (a), 2 individuals shall be considered to be members of 

7 the same family if 1 of the individuals is the spouse, or 

8 a child, sibling, grandchild, or legal guardian, of the other 

9 individual. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 13052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05011]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9013-8]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 02/24/2014 Through 02/28/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140053, Draft EIS, FHWA, IL, US 51 Pana to Centralia, Comment 
Period Ends: 04/21/2014, Contact: Catherine A. Batey 217-492-4600.
EIS No. 20140054, Revised Draft EIS, USFS, CA, Harris Vegetation 
Management Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/25/2014, Contact: Emelia H. 
Barnum 530-926-4511 ext. 1600.
EIS No. 20140055, Final Supplement, USACE, FL, Jacksonville Harbor 
Navigation, Review Period Ends: 04/07/2014, Contact: Samantha Borer 
904-232-1066.
EIS No. 20140056, Draft EIS, USFS, CO, Vail Mountain Recreation 
Enhancements Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/21/2014, Contact: Roger 
Poirier 970-945-3212.
EIS No. 20140057, Final EIS, BOEM, 00, PROGRAMMATIC--Geological and 
Geophysical Activities in Federal Waters of the Mid- and South Atlantic 
Outer Continental Shelf and Adjacent State Waters, Review Period Ends: 
04/07/2014, Contact: Gary D. Goeke 504-736-3233.
EIS No. 20140058, Final EIS, USFS, AZ, Kaibab National Forest Plan 
Revision, Review Period Ends: 06/05/2014, Contact: Ariel Leonard 928-
635-8283.
EIS No. 20140059, Final Supplement, NRC, WY, Ross In-Situ Leach 
Recovery (ISR) Project, Supplement to the Generic Environmental Impact 
Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities, Review Period 
Ends: 04/07/2014, Contact: Johari Moore 301-415-7694.
EIS No. 20140060, Draft Supplement, USACE, MS, PROGRAMMATIC EIS--
Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP), Comprehensive Barrier 
Island Restoration, Hancock, Comment Period Ends: 04/21/2014, Contact: 
Susan I. Rees 251-694-4141.
EIS No. 20140061, Final EIS, FERC, NY, Rockaway Delivery Lateral and 
Northeast Connector Projects, Review Period Ends: 04/07/2014, Contact: 
Kara Harris 202-502-6296.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20130381, Draft EIS, FHWA, TX, US 181 Harbor Bridge Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 03/18/2014, Contact: Gregory S. Punske 512-536-
5960.

    Revision to the FR Notice Published 01/03/2014; Extending Comment 
Period from 03/03/2014 to 03/18/2014.

    Dated: March 4, 2014.
James G. Gavin,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-05011 Filed 3-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7138

ARTHUR RODGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:09-cv-01962-CCB)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Whynne Finnegan Rice, 

Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Rodgers, a Maryland inmate, seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order denying his motions for injunctive and 

other relief and the appointment of counsel. We dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice 

of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order denying injunctive relief 

was entered on the docket on June 8, 2011. The notice of appeal 

was filed on August 21, 2011.* Because Rodgers failed to file a 

timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny as moot 

the pending motion to consolidate this case with appeal number 

11-7359, which has been dismissed. We dispense with oral 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

indicated in the certificate of service is the date the notice 

of appeal was delivered to prison officials for mailing to the 

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGION577WESTJACKSONBOULEVARDCHICAGO,IL60604-3590OCT202015Ms.LynnFiedlerChief,AirQualityDivisionMichiganDepartmentofEnvironmentalQualityP.O.Box30260Lansing,Ml48909-7760DearMs.Fiedler:REPLYTOTHEATTENTIONOF:ThankyouforyourSeptember18,2015recommendationsregardingtheattainmentstatusforareasinMichiganunderthe2010sulfurdioxide(S02)nationalambientairqualitystandard(NAAQS).Asyouknow,EPAissubjecttoaMarch2,2015courtorderdirectingustopromulgateSOzdesignationsfortheseareasundersection107oftheCleanAirActbyJuly2,2016.Specifically,wearerequiredtopromulgatedesignationsfortheseareasbecausetheycontainsourcesmeetingtheSOzemissionscriteriaidentifiedintheconsentdecree.Theinformationyouprovidedwillgreatlyhelpusmeetthisduty,andensureprotectionofpublichealthinMichigan.Inadditiontotheinformationyouhaveprovided,wehaverecentlyreceivedmodelingandrelatedinformationfromtheSierraClubthatisrelevanttoasubsetoftheareastobeaddressedbyJuly2,2016.Inyourstate,wehavereceivedinformationpertinenttotheareasnearthefollowingpowerplants:St.Clair,BelleRiver,andMonroe.WeunderstandthatyouhavereceivedthisinformationdirectlyfromtheSierraClub.Pleaseletusknowifyouhaveanyquestionsabouttheinformationwehavereceivedorifyouneedanyadditionalinformation.IamwritingtosolicityourreviewoftheinformationthatSierraClubhasprovided,sothattheEPAcanbaseitsdesignationsdecisionsonthebestavailableinformation.TheCleanAirActprovidesfordesignationstobedevelopedthroughapartnershipofstateagenciesandEPA,howeverwealsobelieveitisimportanttoconsidersignificantandrelevantinformationthatmembersofthepublicprovidetous.ConsistentwiththestructureoftheCleanAirAct,webelievethatthebestfirststepinaddressingthisinformationwouldbeforyouragencytoprovideitsreviewofthisinformation.ParticularlyfortheareaneartheMonroeplant,wheretheSierraClub'srecommendationdiffersfromyourrecommendation,wewouldwelcomeyourcommentarygenerallyontheinformationaswellyourdetailedreviewoftheelementsofSierraClub'sanalysis.Totheextentpracticable,wewouldappreciatequantitativecomparisonsofdatausedinSierraClub'sanalysiscomparedtothedatausedinyouranalysis,tohelpusevaluatetheelementsofthetwoanalyses.WewouldappreciateyourreviewofSierraClub'sinformationbyNovember17,2015.Yourtimelyreviewwouldprovideusvaluableassistanceinourreviewofyourdesignationrecommendationsanddevelopmentofourintendeddesignations,whichweareaimingtocompletebytheendofJanuary2016.Wewillthenpublishnoticeofourintendeddesignationsforpubliccomment,and,asrequiredbyRecycled/Recyclable•PrintedwithVegetableOilBasedInkson100%RecycledPaper(100%Post-Consumer)theCleanAirAct,promulgatefinaldesignationsnosoonerthan120daysaftergivingyounoticeofthem.PleasecontactmeorJohnSummerhaysofmystaffat312-886-6067oratsummerhays.john@epa.govifyouhaveanyquestionsaboutthisrequest.Sincerely,AirProgramsBranch,Chief
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of L.E., a child, * From the 220th District Court

 of Comanche County

Trial Court No. FM15517.

No. 11-19-00084-CV * August 15, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

 sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the order of the trial court is reversed insofar as it ordered the mother and the 

father to pay child support, and judgment is rendered striking paragraphs 14.1, 

14.[2], and 14.[3] from the trial court’s order. In all other respects, we affirm 

the trial court’s order of termination.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19111-19112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9595]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Monday, May 4, 2009, at 6 p.m.; Tuesday, May 5, 2009, at 
10 a.m.; Wednesday, May 6, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.

Place:  Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

Status:  May 4 at 6 p.m.--Closed; May 5 at 10 a.m.--Closed; May 6 at 
8:30 a.m.--Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Monday, May 4 at 6 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Financial Matters.
    2. Strategic Issues.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Tuesday, May 5 at 10 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Continuation of Monday's closed session agenda.

Wednesday, May 6 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Call to Order and Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.
    2. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board.
    3. Recognition of Former Board Chairman.
    4. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    5. Committee Assignments and Committee Reports.

[[Page 19112]]

    6. Quarterly Report on Service Performance.
    7. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.
    8. Tentative Agenda for the June 22, 23 and 24, 2009, meeting in 
Washington, DC, and Adjourn.

Contact Person for More Information:  Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9595 Filed 4-23-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P