alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

          - [Public Notice 114]

# AGENCY:

Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The form will be used by exporters to report and pay premiums on insured shipments to various foreign buyers. Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or electronically.

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before June 29, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Direct all comments and requests for additional information to Walter Kosciow, Export-Import Bank of the U.S., 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3649, (800) 565-3946, or                         *walter.kosciow@exim.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title and Form Number:*                     Report of Premiums Payable for Exporters Only, EIB 92-29.                

*OMB Number:*                     3048-0017.                

*Type of Review:*                     Regular.                

*Need and Use:*                     The information requested enables the applicant to provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to record customer utilization and manage prospective insurance liability relative to risk premiums received.                

*Affected Public:*                     The form affects entities involved in the export of U.S. goods and services.                

*Estimated Annual Respondents:*                     1,850.                

*Estimated Time per Respondent:*                     30 minutes.                

*Estimated Annual Burden:*                     11,100.                

*Frequency of Reporting or Use:*                     Monthly.                

Solomon Bush,

Agency Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9-9850 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2796 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2796

To suspend temporarily the duty on hydrazine hydrate, aqueous solution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Blumenthal introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on hydrazine hydrate, aqueous solution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYDRAZINE HYDRATE, AQUEOUS SOLUTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Hydrazine hydrate,  Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          aqueous solution                                                  12/31/2015
                          (all grades) (CAS
                          No. 7803-57-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2825.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-1.htm


 



Exhibit 10.1





 


[The Middleby Corporation Letterhead]







Selim A. Bassoul


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


The Middleby Corporation


1400 Toastmaster Drive


Elgin, Illinois 60120







Re:       Employment Agreement Extension







Dear Selim







I am writing to confirm our understanding with you that the term of your employment with The Middleby Corporation (the “Company”) and Middleby Marshall Inc. (“MMI”) shall be extended for a one year period ending on March 1, 2013 and, in connection therewith, the terms and conditions of your employment agreement with the Company and MMI dated as of December 23, 2004 and as amended as of December 31, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”) shall remain in full force and effect, except that the term will expire on March 1, 2013.


 


By signing below, you agree that you wish to continue to be employed by the Company under the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement  for the extended term ending on March 1, 2013.




 


Very truly yours,


 

 



	
THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION


	  
	  
	
By:

	 	/s/ John R. Miller III	 
	  	 	 
John R. Miller III


Chairman, The Middleby Compensation Committee

	
 


	  
	  
	
MIDDLEBY MARSHALL INC.


	  
	  
	
By:

	 	/s/ John R. Miller III	 
	  	 	 
John R. Miller III


Chairman, The Middleby Compensation Committee

	
 












Accepted and agreed:













	
/s/ Selim A. Bassoul

	  	
2/28/2012

	  
	
Selim A. Bassoul

	  	
DATE
Exhibit 10.30



 Addendum 1 to Master Channel Agreement 

This Addendum No. 1 (the “Addendum”) is entered into effective as of January 16, 2012 (the “Addendum
Effective Date”) by and between EC America, Inc. (“immix”) and Sourcefire, Inc. (“Manufacturer”) and modifies the Master Channel Agreement dated March 21, 2011 by and between immix, Sourcefire and
immixGroup, Inc. (the “Agreement”). All capitalized terms used in this Addendum and not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement. 
 Effective as of the Addendum Effective Date, Manufacturer and immix agree that the Agreement shall be modified as follows: 
 1. Subject to the terms of this Addendum, immix and its Affiliates will be permitted to sell Products, Support and Product Services to immix’s Authorized Reseller for resale on the New York Office of
General Services (“NY OGS”) contract held by the Authorized Reseller (the “NY OGS Contract”). 
 2. The
parties agree that all Products, Support and Product Services supplied or manufactured by Manufacturer and sold or supplied for the NY OGS Contract shall be supplied and sold pursuant to (a) the terms and conditions of the Agreement and
(b) the warranties contained in Section 72(d) of Appendix B (General Specifications) of NY OGS Contract Solicitation, “RFP 21350, Group 77018 Comprehensive Telecommunications Equipment and Solutions (2009 Version).” 

3. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Addendum and the Agreement, the terms of this Addendum shall control with respect to such
conflict. 
 4. Except as modified by this Addendum, the terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

The parties executing this Addendum as of the Addendum Effective Date set forth above represent that they are duly authorized to do so and
shall be the parties notified in the event of any questions, concerns or disputes pertaining to this Addendum. 
  

					
	EC America, Inc.	 		 	Sourcefire, Inc.
			
	/s/ Skip Liesegang	 		 	/s/ Nick Margarites
	Name: Skip Liesegang	 		 	Name: Nick Margarites
			
	Title: Vice President	 		 	Title: Vice President, Finance
			
	Date: 01/16/2012	 		 	Date: 01/16/2012
# L_2004295EN.01002701.xml

| 18.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 295/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 295/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1639/2004

of 17 September 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 10 to 16 September 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 17 September 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Progress in protecting air travel from volcanic ash clouds      

      December 21, 2021    

The Eyjafjallajökull eruption of 2010 demonstrated the far-reaching impact of ash clouds and the vulnerability of our jet-based society to them, prompting a review of procedures to detect, warn, and forecast ash cloud hazards to aviation. The years since 2010 have seen marked improvements in satellite technology, more accurate ash-dispersion models that integrate simulations with observations, and more thoroughly vetted and harmonized procedures for forecasting and communicating hazards. In the coming decade, we expect these trends to continue, with formal warning products migrating from text and simplified maps to 4D data streams. This paper details some of these advancements and challenges ahead.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Larry G. Mastin, Ph.D.

##### Physical Volcanologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

lgmastin@usgs.gov

360-993-8925

#### Thomas J Casadevall

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

tcasadevall@usgs.gov

303-236-5648

## Related Content

#### Larry G. Mastin, Ph.D.

##### Physical Volcanologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

lgmastin@usgs.gov

360-993-8925

#### Thomas J Casadevall

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

tcasadevall@usgs.gov

303-236-5648

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Myths and facts on wastewater injection, hydraulic fracturing, enhanced oil recovery, and induced seismicity      

      August 1, 2015    

The central United States has undergone a dramatic increase in seismicity over the past 6 years (Fig. 1), rising from an average of 24 M≥3 earthquakes per year in the years 1973–2008 to an average of 193 M≥3 earthquakes in 2009–2014, with 688 occurring in 2014 alone. Multiple damaging earthquakes have occurred during this increase including the 2011 M 5.6 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake; the 2011 M 5.3 Trinidad, Colorado, earthquake; and the 2011M 4.7 Guy‐Greenbrier, Arkansas, earthquake. The increased seismicity is limited to a few areas and the evidence is mounting that the seismicity in many of these locations is induced by the deep injection of fluids from nearby oil and gas operations. Earthquakes that are caused by human activities are known as induced earthquakes. Most injection operations, though, do not appear to induce earthquakes. Although the message that these earthquakes are induced by fluid injection related to oil and gas production has been communicated clearly, there remains confusion in the popular press beyond this basic level of understanding.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30228]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 15929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05764]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Lysando 
AG of Triesenberg, Liechtenstein, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent 
Application Serial No. 12/470,321, ``LAMBDASA2 ENDOLYSIN TRUNCATION'', 
filed on May 21, 2009; U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/874,138, 
``BACTERIOPHAGE LYTIC ENZYMES AS ALTERNATIVE ANTIMICROBIALS'', filed on 
September 1, 2010; U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/460,812, 
``TRIPLE ACTING ANTIMICROBIALS THAT ARE REFRACTORY TO RESISTANCE 
DEVELOPMENT'', filed on July 24, 2009; and U.S. Patent Application 
Serial No. 12/784,675, ``FUSION OF PEPTIDOGLYCAN HYDROLASE ENZYMES TO A 
PROTEIN TRANSDUCTION DOMAIN ALLOWS ERADICATION OF BOTH EXTRACELLULAR 
AND INTRACELLULAR GRAM POSITIVE'', filed on July 24, 2009.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
these inventions are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license these inventions as Lysando AG of Triesenberg, 
Liechtenstein has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a 
license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Robert Griesbach,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-05764 Filed 3-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Population genetic structure of a widespread coniferous tree, *Taxodium distichum* [L.] Rich. (Cupressaceae), in the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley and Florida      

      December 31, 2012    

Studies of genetic variation can elucidate the structure of present and past populations as well as the genetic basis of the phenotypic variability of species. Taxodium distichum is a coniferous tree dominant in lowland river flood plains and swamps of the southeastern USA which exhibits morphological variability and adaption to stressful habitats. This study provides a survey of the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley (MAV) and Florida to elucidate their population structure and the extent of genetic differentiation between the two regions and sympatric varieties, including bald cypress (var. distichum) and pond cypress (var. imbricatum). We determined the genotypes of 12 simple sequence repeat loci totaling 444 adult individuals from 18 natural populations. Bayesian clustering analysis revealed high levels of differentiation between the MAV and the Florida regions. Within the MAV region, there was a significant correlation between genetic and geographical distances. In addition, we found that there was almost no genetic differentiation between the varieties. Most genetic variation was found within individuals (76.73 %), 1.67 % among individuals within population, 15.36 % among populations within the regions, and 9.23 % between regions within the variety. Our results suggest that (1) the populations of the MAV and the Florida regions are divided into two major genetic groups, which might originate from different glacial refugia, and (2) the patterns of genetic differentiation and phenotypic differentiation were not parallel in this species.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Beth A Middleton, Ph. D.

##### Research Ecologist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

middletonb@usgs.gov

337-262-7618

## Related Content

#### Beth A Middleton, Ph. D.

##### Research Ecologist

Wetland and Aquatic Research Center 

middletonb@usgs.gov

337-262-7618

### Contact

####               Wetland and Aquatic Research Center - Gainesville, FL          

7920 NW 71st St.Gainesville, FL32653United States

352-378-8181

352-378-4956

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Florida;Georgia;Louisiana;Mississippi;Alabama;Arkansas;Tennessee;Illinois;Kentucky;Missouri
                  - Florida
                  - Georgia
                  - Louisiana
                  - mississippi
                  - Alabama
                  - Arkansas
                  - tennessee
                  - Illinois
                  - Kentucky
                  - missouri

View All **
David Shawn POINDEXTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 2, 2017.

David Shawn Poindexter, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Lisa FELTON-WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Elite Health Billing, LLC, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Integrating airborne and mobile lidar data with UAV photogrammetry for rapid assessment of changing forest snow depth and cover      

      September 17, 2021    

Forest structure and topography can influence the ecohydrologic function and resiliency to drought and changing climate. It is, therefore, important to understand how forest restoration treatments alter snowpack distribution and design the treatments accordingly. We use a combination of aerial lidar, multi-temporal terrestrial mobile lidar, and UAV photogrammetry to estimate rapidly changing snow depth and cover in northern Arizona, USA. We then examine the impact of forest structure and topography on snow depth and snow cover persistence to inform forest restoration treatments. Our results show that mobile lidar data can be used to estimate snow depth with standard errors of 8 cm when differenced with snow-off airborne lidar data. UAV-based Structure-from-Motion data can be used to estimate snow cover persistence with 92–97% overall accuracies in forested ecosystems. Random forest models indicate spatially varying importance of forest structural and topographic variables in predicting snow depth and cover persistence, when summarized at different spatial scales (from 5 m to 250 m) and with variable directional location offsets. Forest snow depth was best explained (R2 ≈ 0.46) by canopy height metrics at summary scales of >75 m, while canopy cover was most important at summary scales of <40 m (R2 ≈ 0.3). Snow cover persistence was best explained at very local scales by canopy cover (R2 ≈ 0.38) and less so at larger scales (>75 m) by topographic and forest patch characteristics (R2 ≈ 0.34). Our results demonstrate that 3-dimensional datasets are critical in rapidly characterizing changing snowpack to better understand the impacts of forest structure and topography to inform forest restoration treatment designs. The relationships observed in our study can inform currently ongoing regional-scale forest restoration in the southwest to improve forest health and resiliency.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092