alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 161 (Monday, August 21, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 43494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30821]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Bureau of Land Management

[ID-054-1430-01; IDI-28819]

Notice of Realty Action, Sale of Public Land in Lincoln County, 
Idaho

Correction

    In notice document 95-18492 beginning on page 38570 in the issue of 
Thursday, July 27, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 38571, under SUMMARY:, in the first column, in the 10th 
line, ``NE\1/4\'' should read ``NW\1/4\''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34705-34706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X00-10531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Notice of Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and 
Availability

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability will meet 
on Thursday, August 24, 2000, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting will 
take place at the Hyatt Regency Hotel on Capitol Hill, 400 New Jersey 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20001. The meeting will be entirely open to 
the public.
    The Advisory Committee will review the role of various 
considerations in decision making related to new and existing blood 
safety measures.
    Public comment will be solicited at the meeting. Public comment 
will be limited three minutes per speaker. Those who wish to have 
printed material distributed to Advisory Committee members should 
submit thirty (30) copies to the Executive Secretary prior to close of 
business August 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen D. Nightingale, M.D., 
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and 
Availability, Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public 
Health and Safety, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Rm 736E, Washington, DC 
20201. Phone (202) 690-5560 FAX (202) 690-7560 e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91e2e5f4e1f9f4fff5fff8f6f9e5f8fff6f0fdf4d1fee2fee1f9e2bff5f9f9e2bff6fee7">[email protected]</a>.

    Dated: May 23, 2000.
Stephen D. Nightingale,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and 
Availability.
[FR Doc.

[[Page 34706]]

00-13482 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30831]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Part 151

RIN 1076-AC51


Land Acquisitions (Nongaming)

Correction

    In rule document 95-15215 beginning on page 32874 in the issue of 
Friday, June 23, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 32876, in the second column, under the heading Section 
151.11(b) Acquisitions in Non-Indian Communities, in the line 14th 
line, ``even thought he'' should read ``even though the''.
    2. On page 32877, in the first column, in the fourth line, 
``Seciton 151.11(d) Ordinances'' should read ``Section 151.11(d) 
Ordinances''.
    3. On the same page, in the same column, under Comment:, in the 
sixth line ``specifically, ti'' should read ``specifically, it''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-41 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 145 (Friday, July 28, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 38893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10728]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 38893]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2932 Maine]


S.D. Warren Co., Notice of Intent To File An Application for a 
New License

June 6, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-14260 appearing on page 30859 in the issue of 
Monday, June 12, 1995, the project number should appear as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Proposed standard weight (Ws) equation and length categories for Utah Chub      

      June 25, 2021    

Condition indices, such as relative weight (Wr), provide a simple method for comparing length–weight relationships among populations. However, no standard weight (Ws) equation has been developed for Utah Chub Gila atraria, a species of important management focus in the Intermountain West. We obtained length–weight data for 30,541 Utah Chub from 24 populations in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming. We used the regression line percentile (RLP), linear empirical percentile (EmP), and quadratic EmP methods to develop average (50th percentile) and above average (75th percentile) Ws equations. Additionally, Froese’s method was used to develop another Ws equation for Utah Chub. Length-related biases were detected in Ws equations developed using the RLP, 50th percentile quadratic EmP, and Froese methods. The linear EmP Ws equations did not exhibit length-related biases for the 50th and 75th percentiles. We propose using the 75th percentile linear EmP Ws equation for Utah Chub between 90 and 410 mm TL. The EmP 75th percentile equation was log10(Ws) = −4.938 + 3.031·log10(TL), where Ws is weight in grams and TL is in millimeters. The English equivalent of this equation is log10(Ws) = −3.335 + 3.031·log10(TL), where Ws is weight in pounds and TL is in inches for 4–16-in Utah Chub. Additionally, we propose that minimum TLs of 100 mm (4 in; stock), 200 mm (8 in; quality), 250 mm (10 in; preferred), 300 mm (12 in; memorable), and 380 mm (15 in; trophy) be used to calculate proportional size distribution (PSD) indices. Better understanding Utah Chub populations using Wr and PSDs will aid managers in assessing management strategies (e.g., biological controls) focused on Utah Chub.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Michael C. Quist, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mquist@usgs.gov

208-885-4064

## Related Content

#### Michael C. Quist, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mquist@usgs.gov

208-885-4064

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7493

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CHUN-YU ZHAO, a/k/a Jessica Smith, a/k/a Chun Yu Zhao,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:10-cr-00317-GBL-1; 1:14-cv-01787-GBL)

Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: February 10, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter David Goldberger, Ardmore, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. 

Kellen Sean Dwyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chun-Yu Zhao seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Zhao has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|STATE OR COUNTRY           |  | OFFICIAL NAME                           
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Germany                    |  | Agile Software GmbH                     
|Japan                      |  | Agile Software KK                       
|Taiwan                     |  | Agile Software Limited                  
|United Kingdom             |  | Agile Software Limited                  
|Delaware                   |  | Agile Software International Corporation
|Peoples Republic of China |  | Agile Software (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.       
|Hong Kong                  |  | Agile Software Limited                  
|India                      |  | Product Chain Solutions Private Limited
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Preliminary national-scale seismic risk assessment of natural gas pipelines in the United States      

      November 16, 2022    

Although the gas pipeline infrastructure in the United States is vulnerable to the seismic hazards of (i) strong ground shaking, and (ii) ground failures induced by surface faulting, liquefaction, or landslides, limited national guidance exists for operators to consistently evaluate the earthquake response of their pipelines. To provide additional information for stakeholders and establish more consistency at a national scale, we attempt to quantify seismic risk for gas transmission pipelines in the conterminous United States using a metric such as average annual loss, which helps readily distinguish geographic areas of high and low relative risk. Specifically, we integrate the 2018 National Pipeline Mapping System, the 2018 National Seismic Hazard Model, and several candidate models from the literature for estimating pipeline damage. Through this effort, we highlight major research needs for ultimately reducing the many uncertainties associated with a comprehensive seismic risk assessment of gas pipelines.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Neal Simon Kwong, PhD

##### Research Structural Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

nkwong@usgs.gov

303-273-8589

#### Kishor  Jaiswal

##### Research Structural Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

kjaiswal@usgs.gov

303-273-8584

#### Nicolas Luco

##### Research Civil Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

nluco@usgs.gov

303-273-8683

#### Kristin Ludwig

##### Science Advisor for Risk Reduction

Natural Hazards Mission Area

kaludwig@usgs.gov

303-273-8616

## Related Content

#### Neal Simon Kwong, PhD

##### Research Structural Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

nkwong@usgs.gov

303-273-8589

#### Kishor  Jaiswal

##### Research Structural Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

kjaiswal@usgs.gov

303-273-8584

#### Nicolas Luco

##### Research Civil Engineer

Earthquake Hazards Program

nluco@usgs.gov

303-273-8683

#### Kristin Ludwig

##### Science Advisor for Risk Reduction

Natural Hazards Mission Area

kaludwig@usgs.gov

303-273-8616

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - conterminous United States

View All **
Maurice HOLLAND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. In re: Forfeiture of $4976.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3912

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−25801−LMI

Chapter: 13

In re:

Ava C Benjamin

2246 NW 61st Street

Miami FL 33142−7829

SSN: XXX−XX−3669

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Laurel M Isicoff to consider the

following:

[83] Motion to Modify Plan (Re: 73 Modified Chapter 13 Plan) Filed by Debtor Ava C Benjamin (Blanco,

Jose)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted time for this matter is ten

minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: Deceber 01, 2021

Time: 09:00AM

Location: Video Conference by Zoom for Government

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by video conference. DO NOT GO TO THE COURTHOUSE. Attorneys

must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Although conducted by video conference, the hearing is a court

proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed. All participants must dress appropriately, exercise civility, and

otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate in the hearing, you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing.

To register, click on or enter the following registration link in a browser:

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItduiqqz4iGPWRbYC6YTes9xqj5mxBNU4

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described document(s) on all required parties

within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the

Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio recording maintained by the

Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the official record of the hearing.

Dated: 10/20/2021 By: Jose A Blanco

Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 84 Filed 10/20/21 Page 1 of 1
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of River Hawk Aviation, Inc.      (formerly Viva International,Inc.). |

| /s/      Calvin      HumphreyCalvin      HumphreyChief      Executive Officer |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6945

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY GRANDISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-82-501-JH, CA-97-1303-AW)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se. Juliet Ann Eurich, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s judgment is marked as “filed”

on March 26, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on March 27, 1998. Pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), it is the date that the judgment was

physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Grandison seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Grandison, Nos. CR-82-501-JH; CA-97-1303-AW (D.

Md. Mar. 27 and Apr. 16, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Roseanne E. DENNIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Steven A. HOUGHTALING, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# L_2004331EN.01002001.xml

| 5.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 331/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 331/20

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1849/2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 323 of 26 October 2004
  )

On page 3, in recital 5:

for:

| ‘(5) | The Customs Code Committee has not issued an opinion within the time limit set by its Chairman,’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(5)

The Customs Code Committee has not issued an opinion within the time limit set by its Chairman,’

read:

| ‘(5) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(5)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,’.

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3135 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fenamidone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fenamidone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FENAMIDONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.38 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Fenamidone) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1

Annual Certification

Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Santander UK plc (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2016 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: 1 March, 2017 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Nathan Bostock     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Nathan Bostock         
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: 1 March, 2017 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Antonio Roman      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Antonio Roman          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 10, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 52731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21010]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7155

[CO-935-1430-01; COC-55885]


Withdrawal of National Forest System Land for Steamboat Ski Area; 
Colorado

Correction

    In rule document 95-21318 appearing on page 44763 in the issue of 
Tuesday, August 29, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 44763, in the second column, in the third full 
paragraph, the first line is corrected to read:

    ``Thence N. 89 deg.59' E., 1014.00 ft.; N. 60 deg. 45' ''.

    2. And on the same page, in the same column, in the seventh full 
paragraph, the fourth line is corrected to read:

``of 14 deg.36'06" and being subtended by a chord''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Brandon Lamar HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D15-4876

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.