alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3579 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3579

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a 
 Federal election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2012

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a 
 Federal election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voter Integrity Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. UNLAWFUL VOTING.

    (a) Aggravated Felony.--Paragraph (43) of section 101(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (T), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (U), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon and ``and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(V) an offense described in section 611 of title 
                18, United States Code, committed by an alien who is 
                unlawfully present in the United States.''.
    (b) Deportable Offense.--Paragraph (2) of section 237(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
                    ``(G) Voting offenses.--Any alien who is unlawfully 
                present in the United States and who knowingly commits 
                a violation of section 611 of title 18, United States 
                Code.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 3.(i).4
                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              Lucid Concepts, Inc.


Pursuant  to  the  provision  of  section  607.1006,   Florida  Statutes,   this
corporation  adopts the  following  articles  of  amendment  to its  articles of
incorporation:


FIRST:    Amendment(s)  adopted:  (indicate  article  number(s)  being  amended,
          added or deleted)

Amended:


ARTICLE I.  NAME

           The  name  of  the  corporation  shall  be  Clements  Golden  Phoenix
Enterprises,  Inc.: The principal place of business of this corporation shall be
277 Royal Poinciana Way, Suite 192, Palm Beach, FL 33480.


SECOND:    If  an  amendment  provides  for  an  exchange,  reclassification  or
           cancellation  of  issued  shares,  provisions  for  implementing  the
           amendment if not contained in the amendment itself, are as follows:

               n/a

THIRD:     The date of each amendment's adoption:      1/4/2000

FOURTH:    Adoption of Amendment(s) check one:

______    The amendment(s) was/were approved by the shareholders.  The number of
          votes cast for the amendment(s) was/were sufficient for approval.

________  The amendment(s) was/were  approved by the shareholders through voting
          groups.






<PAGE>


          The following  statements  must be separately  provided for
          each  voting  group  entitled  to  vote  separately  on the
          amendment(s):

          "The number of votes cast for the amendment(s) was/were sufficient for
          approval by
                      -----------------------------------------------."
                                           (Voting Group)

___x___   The amendment(s) was/were  adopted  by the  board of directors without
          shareholder  action and shareholder action was not required.

________  The  amendment(s)  was/were   adopted  by  the  incorporators  without
          shareholder action and shareholder action was not required.

           Signed this 4th day of January, 2000.

BY:        _________________________________________
           (By the  Chairman  or  Vice  Chairman  of  the  Board  of  Directors,
           President, or other officer if  adopted by the shareholders)
                               OR
           (By a director if adopted by the directors)
                               OR
           (By an incorporator if adopted by the incorporators)


/s/ Kevin Bell
---------------------
Kevin Bell,  President/Director
Typed or printed Name and Title
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Map showing landslide deposits and late Tertiary and Quaternary faulting in the Ft. Garland-San Luis area, Colorado-New Mexico      

      January 1, 1976    

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Ft. Garland-San Luis area
                  - Colorado
                  -  New Mexico

View All **
Dawn RUFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      March 6, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Samuel ShengSamuel
      Sheng
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                      (principal
      financial and   accounting
officer)
Nathan Collins LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3728

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Year End Report of Luna Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Cameron King



Cameron King

Chief Executive Officer

September 29, 2003



























In connection with the Year End Report of Luna Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Gord McDougall, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Gord McDougall



Gord McDougall

Acting Chief Financial Officer

September 29, 2003
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Liquefaction hazard for the region of Evansville, Indiana      

      September 19, 2011    

We calculated liquefaction potential index for a grid of sites in the Evansville, Indiana area for two scenario earthquakes-a magnitude 7.7 in the New Madrid seismic zone and a M6.8 in the Wabash Valley seismic zone. For the latter event, peak ground accelerations range from 0.13 gravity to 0.81 gravity, sufficiently high to be of concern for liquefaction.Recently acquired cone-penetrometer test data at 58 sites were used to estimate the factor of safety against liquefaction and liquefaction potential index at each site. To extend the estimation of liquefaction hazard to a grid of sites in the area, the soil columns at these grid sites were divided into three categories, and for each category a sufficient number of cone-penetrometer test sites were available to characterize statistically each group's cone-penetrometer test tip resistance and sleeve friction. At each grid site, Monte Carlo sampling was used to generate values for these two parameters at 2-meter intervals for depths down to 20 meters or bedrock. The groundwater table at each grid site was likewise sampled from a mean value and group-dependent standard deviation. For each grid site, 25,000 realizations of the soil profile were generated and a probability distribution of liquefaction potential index values was obtained.Maps of liquefaction hazard for each scenario earthquake present (1) Mean liquefaction potential index at each site, and (2) Probabilities that liquefaction potential index values exceed 5 (threshold for expression of surface liquefaction) and 12 (threshold for lateral spreading). Values for the liquefaction potential index are high in the River alluvium group, where the soil profiles are predominantly sand, while values in the Lacustrine terrace group are lower, owing to the predominance of clay. Liquefaction potential index values in the Outwash terrace group are less consistent because the soil profiles contain highly variable sequences of silty sand, clayey sand, and sandy clay, justifying the use of the Monte Carlo procedure to capture the consequences of this complexity.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earthquake Hazards Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

twoods@usgs.gov

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - Indiana

View All **
Fees to be paid to the Company's Non-Employee Directors - 2012.



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Fees to be Paid to the Non-Employee Directors 
 of Sealed Air Corporation
(the “Corporation”) 
 2012 
 Members of the Board of Directors who are not officers or employees of the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation (“non-employee directors”) shall be paid the following directors’
fees in cash, payable quarterly in arrears on or about the first day of the succeeding calendar quarter, which fees shall be in addition to retainers payable to non-employee directors under the Sealed Air Corporation 2002 Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors: 
 (i) for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Audit Committee, a fee of Six Thousand Two Hundred Fifty
Dollars ($6,250) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Audit Committee, a fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) per calendar quarter for serving as a member; 

(ii) for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a fee of Three Thousand Seven
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($3,750) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a fee of One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ($1,875) per calendar quarter for
serving as a member; 
 (iii) for each non-employee director who is designated as chair of the Organization and Compensation Committee, a fee of
Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) per calendar quarter for serving as chair, and for each other member of the Organization and Compensation Committee, a fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) per calendar quarter for serving as a member;

 (iv) a fee of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) per calendar quarter for serving as lead director, or Six Thousand Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($6,250) per calendar quarter for serving as such and as chair of a standing committee during the same quarter; 
 (v) a fee of
Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) per day for special assignments undertaken by a non-employee director at the request of the Board or any committee of the Board or for attending a director education program; and 

(vi) meeting fees as approved by the Board of Directors for non-employee directors who serve on any special committee or for attendance at special
meetings of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors in the event of a major transaction, etc. 
 The amount of the
Annual Retainer (as defined in the Sealed Air Corporation 2002 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors) to be paid to Non-Employee Directors of the Corporation who are elected at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is $80,000 payable in shares of
Common Stock plus $60,000 payable in cash unless the Non-Employee Director elects payment of the cash portion in shares of Common Stock. 

Under the Sealed Air Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, a non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of his or her Annual
Retainer until the director retires from the Board. None of the other fees mentioned above is eligible to be deferred.
Appendix C

SEMAP 

SENSITIVITY 

STUDY

2 Data Files Included in Electronic Copy Only
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF B. GRANT HUNTER

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, B. Grant Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                              /s/ B. Grant Hunter
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           B. Grant Hunter
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           November 13, 2003
Robert Earl THOMAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4427

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 13.1











Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to


Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:






1.
The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the year ended February 28, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and






2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Linux Gold Corp.




Richmond, BC, Canada




by: /s/ John G. Robertson




September 10, 2009




John G. Robertson


President and Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Erhartic, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15-d14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  I have reviewed the Report;



2.  Based upon my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;



3.  Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;



4.  I and the other certifying officers of the Company:

·are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company;

·have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;

·have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the reporting period; and

·have presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation.



5.  I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

·all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls (a pre-existing term relating to internal controls regarding financial reporting) which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

·any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls.



6.  I and the other certifying officers have indicated in the Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.

Frank Erhartic, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  May 19, 2004
Artie K. PERKINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 208 (Friday, October 27, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 55087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-11027]




Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 208/Friday, October 27, 1995/
Corrections

[[Page 55087]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP95-426-001 and TM96-2-25-001]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

Correction

    In notice document 95-25909 appearing on page 54072 in the issue of 
Thursday, October 19, 1995, in the third column, the Docket number 
should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D