alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Predicting the planform configuration of the braided Toklat River, AK with a suite of rule-based models      

      July 30, 2013    

An ensemble of rule-based models was constructed to assess possible future braided river planform configurations for the Toklat River in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. This approach combined an analysis of large-scale influences on stability with several reduced-complexity models to produce the predictions at a practical level for managers concerned about the persistence of bank erosion while acknowledging the great uncertainty in any landscape prediction. First, a model of confluence angles reproduced observed angles of a major confluence, but showed limited susceptibility to a major rearrangement of the channel planform downstream. Second, a probabilistic map of channel locations was created with a two-parameter channel avulsion model. The predicted channel belt location was concentrated in the same area as the current channel belt. Finally, a suite of valley-scale channel and braid plain characteristics were extracted from a light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-derived surface. The characteristics demonstrated large-scale stabilizing topographic influences on channel planform. The combination of independent analyses increased confidence in the conclusion that the Toklat River braided planform is a dynamically stable system due to large and persistent valley-scale influences, and that a range of avulsive perturbations are likely to result in a relatively unchanged planform configuration in the short term.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Alaska Science Center          

4210 University DriveAnchorage, AK99508United States

(907) 786-7000

(907) 786-7020

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Toklat River
                  - Alaska

View All **
# L_2004190EN.01000301.xml

| 28.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1027/2004

of 27 May 2004

determining the extent to which applications lodged in May 2004 for import licences for certain egg sector products and poultrymeat pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 593/2004 and (EC) No 1251/96 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 593/2004 of 30 March 2004 opening and providing for the administration of the tariff quotas in the egg sector and for egg albumin (1), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1251/96 of 28 June 1996 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas in the poultrymeat sector and albumin (2), and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 submitted pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 593/2004 and (EC) No 1251/96 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 10.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 136. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

2

---

ANNEX

| Group | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 |
| --- | --- |
| E1 | 100,00 |
| E2 | 60,41 |
| E3 | 100,00 |
| P1 | 100,00 |
| P2 | — |
| P3 | 2,25 |
| P4 | 6,25 |

Group

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004

E1

100,00

E2

60,41

E3

100,00

P1

100,00

P2

—

P3

2,25

P4

6,25

---
Exhibit 31.1(a)



CERTIFICATIONS





I, Yahia Gawad, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CardioGenics
Holdings Inc.; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 27, 2012



|By: | /s/ Yahia Gawad        
|--- | -----------------------
|    | _________________      
|    | Yahia Gawad            
|    | Chief Executive Officer
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

37 38 39 

### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/15 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 202 (Thursday, October 19, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 54103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21019]



      

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 202 / Thursday, October 19, 1995 / 
Corrections
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 54103]]


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

7 CFR Part 3017

RIN 0503-AA12


Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-23508 beginning on page 49519 in the 
issue of Tuesday, September 26, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 49520, in the first column, in the first paragraph, in 
the tenth line from the bottom, ``welcome'' should read ``welcomes''.
    2. On the same page, in the 3d column, in the 1st paragraph, in the 
14th line, ``expected'' should read ``excepted''.
    3. On page 59521, in the 1st column, in the 1st paragraph, in the 
13th line, ``break'' should read ``bread''.
    4. On the same page, in the second column, in the fourth full 
paragraph, in the sixth line from the bottom, ``conservative'' should 
read ``conservation''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re:

JEROME GOLDEN CENTER

FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH LLC

Debtor. /

Case No. 19-22704-MAM

Chapter 11

ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S 

EMERGENCY MOTION TO DISMISS CHAPTER 11 

PROCEEDING

THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court on October 8, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. upon 

the Debtor’s Emergency Motion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Proceeding (DE 21), and the Court

being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. For the reason stated on the record, the Debtor’s Motion is hereby GRANTED

and this case is dismissed.

2. The debtor shall pay the United States Trustee the appropriate sum required 

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 10, 2019.

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-22704-MAM Doc 32 Filed 10/10/19 Page 1 of 2
2

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1930(a)(6) within ten (10) days of the entry of 

this Order and simultaneously provide to the United States Trustee an 

appropriate affidavit indicating the cash disbursements for the relevant period 

since the period reported on the last debtor-in-possession report filed by the 

debtor. 

3. The debtor shall pay the Bankruptcy Clerk of the Court any outstanding 

fees, costs and charges in connection with this case within ten (10) days of 

the entry of this Order. 

4. All pending motions are denied as moot.

5. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Order.

###

Submitted by:

PHILIP B. HARRIS, P.A.

Attorneys for Debtor

685 Royal Palm Beach Blvd., Ste. 

205 Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411

561-543-7963

philip@philipbharris.com

Attorney Harris is directed to serve this order upon all interested parties and file a conforming 

certificate of service. 

Case 19-22704-MAM Doc 32 Filed 10/10/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amazon Biotech, Inc., a Utah
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending July 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mechael Kanovsky, Ph.D., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Mechael Kanovsky, Ph.D.
---------------------------
Mechael Kanovsky, Ph.D., Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004
1

The defendant testified he received consecutive sentencing in the general sessions court; however, the

judgments of that court are silent as to concurrent/consecutive sentencing for the two counts. That issue is moot in view

of the de novo appeal to circuit court. 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs August 14, 2002

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES RAY BARTLETT

Circuit Court for Lincoln County

No. S0100037

No. M2001-02419-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 20, 2002

ORDER

Defendant appeals the circuit court judgments denying him probation on two misdemeanor

counts of passing worthless checks. We affirm pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal

Appeals.

On June 18, 2001, the defendant pled guilty in Lincoln County General Sessions Court to two

misdemeanor charges of passing worthless checks. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-121. The general

sessions judge sentenced him to sentences of eleven months and twenty-nine days, with all

suspended except for nine months in the county jail.1 The defendant appealed his sentences to the

circuit court, which conducted a sentencing hearing. The circuit court sentenced him to two

concurrent sentences of eleven months and twenty-nine days to be served in the county jail. The sole

issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by denying probation. 

The proof from the sentencing hearing reflects the defendant has an extensive prior criminal

record which includes misdemeanor convictions and numerous felony convictions, such as grand

larceny, aggravated burglary, multiple burglaries, aggravated assault, and multiple felony thefts. He

committed some of these offenses while he was on probation and/or parole. 

In determining whether to grant or deny probation, a trial court should consider the

circumstances of the offense, the defendant's criminal record, the defendant’s social history and

present condition, the need for deterrence, and the best interest of the defendant and the public. State

v. Grear, 568 S.W.2d 285, 286 (Tenn. 1978); State v. Boyd, 925 S.W.2d 237, 244 (Tenn. Crim. App.

1995). The trial court may also consider whether measures less restrictive than confinement have

been unsuccessful. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-103(1)(C). Given the proof presented to the trial

court regarding the defendant’s extensive prior criminal history and the crimes he has committed
-2-

while on probation and/or parole, we cannot conclude the trial court abused its discretion in denying

probation to the defendant.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed pursuant to

Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Costs are taxed to the state since the defendant

is indigent. 

 

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

 

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

 

NORMA MCGEE OGLE, JUDGE
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-00
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-00
<CASH>                                         144,315
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,598,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,657,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,332,078
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,994
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,323,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,657,169
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               57,760
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,202,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (333,113)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,829,523)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.10)



</TABLE>
William GRAVES, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-530

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geologic interpretation of USGS S. P. Lee seismic-reflection profile WO 76-7 on the continental shelf and upper slope, northwestern Oregon      

      January 1, 1987    

View Document

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oregon

View All **
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael J. Lambert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.

Date: March 16, 2006

By:

/S/    MICHAEL J.
LAMBERTName: Michael J. Lambert Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 19-20404-RAM Doc 20 Filed 09/13/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-20404-RAM Doc 20 Filed 09/13/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-20404-RAM Doc 20 Filed 09/13/19 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Modified Mercalli Intensity for scenario earthquakes in Evansville, Indiana      

      February 7, 2012    

Evansville, Indiana, has experienced minor damage from earthquakes several times in the past 200 years. Because of this history and the fact that Evansville is close to the Wabash Valley and New Madrid seismic zones, there is concern about the hazards from earthquakes. Earthquakes currently cannot be predicted, but scientists can estimate how strongly the ground is likely to shake as a result of an earthquake. Earthquake-hazard maps provide one way of conveying such estimates of strong ground shaking and will help the region prepare for future earthquakes and reduce earthquake-caused losses.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Indiana

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           New K-Ar ages for calculating end-of-shield extrusion rates at West Maui volcano, Hawaiian island chain      

      January 1, 2007    

Thirty-seven new K–Ar ages from West Maui volcano, Hawai‘i, are used to define the waning stages of shield growth and a brief episode of postshield volcanism. All but two samples from shield-stage strata have reversed polarity magnetization, so conceivably the exposed shield is not much older than the Olduvai Normal-Polarity subchron, or about 1.8 Ma. The oldest ages obtained are in the range 1.9–2.1 Ma but have large analytical error. Shield volcanism ended about 1.35 Ma, and postshield volcanism followed soon thereafter, persisting until about 1.2 Ma. Exposed shield-stage strata were emplaced at a rate of about 0.001 km3 per year, a rate smaller than historic Hawaiian magmatic rates by a factor of 100. Stratigraphic accumulation rates are similar to those measured previously at Wai‘anae volcano (O‘ahu) or the upper part of the Mauna Kea shield sequence (Hilo drill core, Hawai‘i). These rates diminish sharply during the final 0.3–0.5 m.y. of the shield stage. Hawaiian shield volcanoes begin waning well before their last 0.5 m.y. of life, then end quickly, geologically speaking, if West Maui is representative.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - West Maui volcano
                  - hawaii

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: January 1976      

      January 1, 1976    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-70106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AC66


Migratory Bird Hunting; Decision on the Conditional Approval of 
Bismuth-Tin Shot as Nontoxic for the 1994-95 Season

Correction

    In rule document 94-32214 beginning on page 61 in the issue of 
Tuesday, January 3, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 61, in the first column, in the EFFECTIVE DATE section, 
``January 3, 1995'' should read ``December 30, 1994''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M.L.LaBranche, IV, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by theReport. 

Date: March 16, 2011 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. **A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 
1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARY A. PITTMAN

, Appellant,

v.

ALVIN EUGENE PITTMAN

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1196

[ November 8, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Peter M. Evans , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016DR005651 WB

.

Mary A. Pittman, Pahokee, pro se.

Thomas Montgomery of Thomas Montgomery, P.A., Belle Glade, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Rodney MADDOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 28, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: October 1981      

      January 1, 1981    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. No. 01

- 14

- 00876

- CR

RANDY GRIFFIN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the 208th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 14 4 2001 ).

The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the
court below on September 23 , 201 4 . After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that it has no juri sdiction over the appeal. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered December 3 , 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20501]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------