alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005036EN.01000901.xml

| 9.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/9

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 7 February 2005

on the continuation in the year 2005 of Community comparative trials and tests on propagating and planting material of fruit plants of certain species pursuant to Council Directive 92/34/EEC started in 2004

(2005/115/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/34/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production (1),

Having regard to Commission Decision 2003/894/EC of 11 December 2003 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on propagating and planting material of Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Malus Mill. and Rubus idaeus L. pursuant to Council Directive 92/34/EEC (2), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Decision 2003/894/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Directive 92/34/EEC as regards Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Malus Mill. and Rubus idaeus L. from 2004 to 2008. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decision 2003/894/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Directive 92/34/EEC as regards Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Malus Mill. and Rubus idaeus L. from 2004 to 2008.

| (2) | Tests and trials carried out in 2004 should be continued in 2005, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Tests and trials carried out in 2004 should be continued in 2005,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2004 on propagating and planting material of Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Malus Mill. and Rubus idaeus L. shall be continued in 2005 in accordance with Decision 2003/894/EC.

Done at Brussels, 7 February 2005.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 157, 10.6.1992, p. 10. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2003/111/EC (OJ L 311, 27.11.2003, p. 12).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 88.

2

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Perturbational and nonperturbational inversion of Rayleigh-wave velocities      

      June 7, 2017    

The inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves is a classic geophysical inverse problem. We have developed a set of MATLAB codes that performs forward modeling and inversion of Rayleigh-wave phase or group velocity measurements. We describe two different methods of inversion: a perturbational method based on finite elements and a nonperturbational method based on the recently developed Dix-type relation for Rayleigh waves. In practice, the nonperturbational method can be used to provide a good starting model that can be iteratively improved with the perturbational method. Although the perturbational method is well-known, we solve the forward problem using an eigenvalue/eigenvector solver instead of the conventional approach of root finding. Features of the codes include the ability to handle any mix of phase or group velocity measurements, combinations of modes of any order, the presence of a surface water layer, computation of partial derivatives due to changes in material properties and layer boundaries, and the implementation of an automatic grid of layers that is optimally suited for the depth sensitivity of Rayleigh waves.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Matt M. Haney

##### Scientist-in-Charge

Alaska Volcano Observatory

mhaney@usgs.gov

907-786-7111

## Related Content

#### Matt M. Haney

##### Scientist-in-Charge

Alaska Volcano Observatory

mhaney@usgs.gov

907-786-7111

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00085-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23-9170-431

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

BRITTANY TURNER WHITE, Appellant

V.

LOUDER WITH CROWDER, LLC, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. Having previously 

abated the appeal, we lift the abatement, grant the joint motion, and dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f).

Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, each party must bear its own costs of 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 6, 2024
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4761 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, 

California, as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4761 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LOUIS VAN IERSEL POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Si4 erra Madre, California, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10228]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350


    Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Horace J. Davis III
------------------------------------
Horace J. Davis III
November 14, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Practical limitations of Earthquake Early Warning      

      April 12, 2020    

Earthquake Early Earning (EEW) entails detection of initial earthquake shaking and rapid estimation and notification to users prior to imminent, stronger shaking. EEW is coming to the U.S. West Coast. But what are the technical and social challenges to delivering actionable information on earthquake shaking before it arrives? Although there will be tangible benefits, there are also limitations. Basic seismological principles, alert communication challenges, and potential response actions as well as substantial lessons learned from the use of EEW in Japan, point to more limited opportunities to warn and protect than perhaps many expect. This is in part because potential warning times vary by region and are influenced by tectonic environment, hypocentral depth, and the fault’s proximity to the alert user. For the U.S. West Coast, particularly for crustal earthquakes, warning times are less impressive—and possible mitigation actions are likely to be less effective—than often maintained. Nevertheless, EEW is an additional arrow in the quiver of earthquake information tools available in the service of earthquake risk reduction. What is called for, then, is transparency and balance in the EEW discussion: along with its potential, the acknowledgement of EEW’s inherent and practical limitations is needed. Recognizing these limitations could, in fact, make EEW implementation more successful as part of a holistic earthquake mitigation strategy, where its role among other earthquake information tools is quite natural.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441

## Related Content

#### David J Wald

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

wald@usgs.gov

303-273-8441

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: GERARDO ARIAS CASE NUMBER: 19-26046-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

(If this case is dismissed, this deficiency is an objection to reinstate)

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows. The debtor may be dismissed for 

failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. The Court may dismiss this case if no one 

appears at the confirmation hearing to represent the debtor. The Trustee reserves the right to raise 

additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and reviewed for issues raised 

and additional documents needed.

Debtor’s attorney must provide all written responses or documents through BKDOCS.COM by 5pm at least 15 

days prior to the confirmation hearing. Pro Se debtors may fax to 954-443-4452. Late documents may not be 

reviewed or considered, and this case may be at risk of dismissal. 

ATTORNEYS MUST SEEK A RESOLUTION PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING OF 

ALL OUTSTANDING ISSUES. The Trustee’s Office has a “Precall” date. During this period, the Debtor’s 

or Creditor’s attorney must call THE THURSDAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING and speak to the Trustee’s 

staff attorney unless they agree to the Trustee’s recommendation. A final calendar will be published with any 

changes of this recommendation the day before the hearing. 

===============================================================================

CONFIRMATION RECOMMENDATION: LAST REVIEWED: October 18, 2022 9:00 

15AP served 8/25

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

If Debtor files Plan on or before 10/20 to pay $52,774.56 in total to Jacaranda 15 A Plan pays $51,829.55

and no other changes, Confirm 16 A Plan, if not Continue to 11/15, file amended plan on or before 10/28 to

pay $52,774.56 in total to Jacaranda 15 A Plan pays $51,829.55

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 254 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 1
Timothy Donald HELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 21**— SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT     1. **Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc.**    (Wireline segment doing business as    Puerto Rico Telephone)         (Wireless segment doing business    as Verizon Wireless)         Physical address: 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue,Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968  Mailing address: P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998  State/jurisdiction of Incorporation: Puerto Rico     2. **Coqui.net Corporation**    (Doing business as Coqui.net)         Physical address: 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue,Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968  Mailing address: P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998  State/jurisdiction of Incorporation: Puerto Rico     3. **PRT Larga Distancia, Inc.**    (Doing business as PRT Larga    Distancia)         Physical address: 1515 F.D. Roosevelt Avenue,Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968  Mailing address: P.O. Box 360998, San Juan, P.R. 00936-0998  State/jurisdiction of Incorporation: Puerto Rico
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetic susceptibility for use in delineating hydric soils      

      January 1, 2000    

Field indicators are used to identify hydric soil boundaries and to delineate wetlands. The most common field indicators may not be seen in some soils with thick, dark, mollic epipedons, and do not form in Fe-poor soils. This study evaluated magnetic susceptibility (MS) meter as a field tool to determine hydric soil boundaries. Five Mollisol-dominated sites formed in glacial deposits in Illinois were evaluated along with one Ultisol-dominated site formed in Coastal Plain sediments of North Carolina. Measurements of volumetric MS were made along transects at each site that extended from wetland into upland areas. One created wetland was evaluated. Field indicators were used to identify the hydric soils. Results showed that volumetric MS values were significantly (P < 0.01) lower in hydric soils than in nonhydric soils formed in glacial deposits. Volumetric MS values also decreased slightly with depth. In a created marsh, significant differences in MS were found between hydric and nonhydric soils at 15 to 30 cm but not at shallower depths where topsoil from a wetland had been artificially applied. No significant (P > 0.15) differences in MS were found for Coastal Plain hydric and nonhydric soils where MS values were low (<10 × 10−5 SI). Critical MS values that separated hydric and nonhydric soils varied between 20 × 10−5 and 30 × 10−5 SI for the loessal soils evaluated in Illinois. Such critical values will have to be determined on site using field indicators until specific values can be defined for hydric soils within a given parent material. With a critical MS value in hand, a wetland delineator can make MS measurements along transects perpendicular to the envisioned hydric soil boundary to quickly and quantitatively identify it.

## Citation Information
Case 19-25044-MAM Doc 58 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-25044-MAM Doc 58 Filed 07/28/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-25044-MAM Doc 58 Filed 07/28/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide in a deep saline carbonate reservoir with TOUGH2–ChemPlugin, a new tool for reactive transport modeling      

      June 1, 2020    

This paper outlines the development and demonstration of a new tool, TOUGH2–ChemPlugin (T2CPI) for predicting rock–water–CO2 interaction following injection of supercritical CO2 into a heterogeneous carbonate system. Specifically, modeling capabilities of TOUGH2, which examines multiphase flow and supercritical CO2 behavior, were combined with the geochemical modeling capabilities of The Geochemist’s Workbench® (GWB), using ChemPluginTM. ChemPlugin is a self-linking re-entrant software object that, when coupled to a transport simulator, retains the flow and transport capabilities of the simulator but enables incorporation of reactive chemistry via GWB. To test and assess the capabilities of T2CPI, results from T2CPI simulations were compared to those of TOUGHREACT, using the same carbonate reservoir parameters (based on the Dollar Bay Formation of the South Florida Basin). Overall, results of simulations from TOUGHREACT and T2CPI were very similar for nearly all evaluated parameters. Dissimilarities between the two programs included qualitative differences in how TOUGHREACT and T2CPI predicted calcite dissolution and the subsequent spatial pattern of the porosity gain caused by how each handles evaporation of water near the injection point. The TOUGHREACT program is a proven, widely used tool for evaluating CO2–brine–rock interaction following supercritical CO2 injection. The T2CPI tool offers similar capabilities and strengths of TOUGHREACT, with the ability to read in and use databases for a wide range of activity coefficient types. This program also has abilities to use a wide range of kinetic constraints, define those kinetic constraints with scripts or compiled libraries, account for colloidal transport, and/or account for a wide range of surface sorption models.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Tina Roberts-Ashby, Ph.D.

##### Science Center Director

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

troberts-ashby@usgs.gov

703-648-6543

#### Madalyn S. Blondes, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

mblondes@usgs.gov

703-648-6509

## Related Content

#### Tina Roberts-Ashby, Ph.D.

##### Science Center Director

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

troberts-ashby@usgs.gov

703-648-6543

#### Madalyn S. Blondes, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

mblondes@usgs.gov

703-648-6509

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Dollar Bay Formation
                  - Florida

View All **
Exhibit 99.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Year End Report of Luna Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brent Shaw, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Brent Shaw



Brent Shaw

Acting Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 170 (Friday, September 1, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10901]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 45776]]


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

Correction

    In notice document 95-20122 beginning on page 42596 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 16, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 42616, in the first column, under ``Consumers Power 
Company, Docket No. 50-155, Big Rock Point Plant, Charlevoix County, 
Michigan'' in the 15th line, ``Amendment No.: 16'' should read 
``Amendment No.: 116''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20428]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Major-oxide and trace-element geochemical data from rocks collected on Little Sitkin Island, from Little Sitkin Volcano, Alaska      

      June 1, 2020    

During the 2005 summer field season, geologists Michelle Coombs, Christina Neal, and Jessica Larsen from the University of Alaska, Fairbanks and the U.S. Geological survey, Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO) conducted fieldwork on Little Sitkin Island in the western Aleutians of Alaska. The primary purpose of the fieldwork was to install geophysical networks for volcano monitoring. As part of this effort, AVO geologists conducted reconnaissance fieldwork focused primarily on sample collection for geochemistry. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Christina A. Neal

##### Science Center Director

Volcano Science Center

tneal@usgs.gov

907-786-7458

## Related Content

#### Christina A. Neal

##### Science Center Director

Volcano Science Center

tneal@usgs.gov

907-786-7458

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Little Sitkin Island
                  -  Little Sitkin Volcano
                  - Alaska

View All **
Exhibit 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Tritel, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-92739 and No. 333-92727) on Forms S-8 of Tritel, Inc. of our report dated
February 18, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Tritel, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, members' and stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form
10-K of Tritel, Inc.

                                            /s/ KPMG LLP

Jackson, Mississippi
March 29, 2000
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of floods in Alaska south of the Yukon River      

      January 1, 1964    

View Document

View Plate

This report presents a method for evaluating the magnitude and frequency of floods on the basis of the analysis of flood records. One composite frequency curve is applied to the entire study region. This curve relates floods of various magnitudes at any site within the region to probable recurrence intervals (from 1.1 to 50 years) for those floods. Flood magnitudes are reduced to dimensionless form by expressing them as a ratio to mean annual flood. Magnitudes of mean annual floods vary with the flood-producing characteristics of stream basins. On the basis of the limited data available, drainage-area size is found to be the only significant factor affecting the magnitude of the mean annual flood. Trial and error groupings of gaging-station records show that the region can be split into three hydrologic areas: one curve defines the relation within each area between mean annual flood and drainage area. These three curves in combination with the composite flood-frequency curve permit, for natural-flow conditions at any site, the determination of flood magnitude for a given recurrence interval, or the determination of recurrence interval for a flood of known magnitude.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Yukon River
                  - Alaska

View All **