alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A177
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3478 

To amend the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 to provide 

improvements to such Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2012 

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. FRANKEN, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act 

of 1974 to provide improvements to such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Uninterrupted Schol5 ars Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY. 

7 Section 444(b) of the General Education Provisions 

8 Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g(b), commonly known as the ‘‘FamVerDate Mar 15 2010 16:28 Aug 02, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3478.IS S3478

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3478 IS

1 ily Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974’’) is 

2 amended— 

3 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

4 (A) in subparagraph (F), by inserting ‘‘or 

5 for, or on behalf of, child welfare agencies for 

6 the purpose of assessing policies and practices 

7 intended to improve educational outcomes for 

8 students in foster care,’’ after ‘‘improving in9 struction,’’; 

10 (B) in subparagraph (J)(ii), by striking 

11 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end; 

12 (C) in subparagraph (K)(ii), by striking 

13 the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

14 and 

15 (D) by inserting after subparagraph (K) 

16 the following: 

17 ‘‘(L) a State or local welfare agency or tribal 

18 organization (as defined in section 4 of the Indian 

19 Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act 

20 (25 U.S.C. 450b)) when such agency or organization 

21 has responsibility for the student’s placement and 

22 care, provided that the education records, or the per23 sonally identifiable information contained in such 

24 records, of the student will not be disclosed by the 

25 agency or organization except to an individual enVerDate Mar 15 2010 16:28 Aug 02, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3478.IS S3478

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3478 IS

1 gaged in addressing the student’s educational needs, 

2 and consistent with the confidentiality laws in the 

3 State applicable to an individual’s personal 

4 records.’’; and 

5 (2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘, except 

6 when a parent is a party to a child welfare court 

7 proceeding, and the order is issued in the context of 

8 that proceeding, additional notice to the parent by 

9 the educational agency or institution is not re10 quired’’ after ‘‘educational institution or agency’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetic fields over active tectonic zones in ocean      

      January 1, 2002    

The aim of our work is to estimate the electromagnetic effects that can be detected in the submarine zones with hydrothermal activity. It is known that meso-scale flows appear in the regions over underwater volcanoes or hot rocks. Their origin is connected with heat flux and hot jets released from underwater volcanoes or faults in a sea bottom. Values of mean velocities and turbulent velocities in plumes were estimated. Quasiconstant magnetic fields induced by a hot jet and a vortex over a plume top are about 1-40 nT. Variable magnetic fields are about 0.1-1 nT. These magnetic disturbances in the sea medium create an additional natural electromagnetic background that must be considered when making detailed magnetic surveys. ?? 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
# L_2004254EN.01001401.xml

| 30.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/14

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1371/2004

of 29 July 2004

on the issue of import licences for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 996/97 of 3 June 1997 on the opening and administration of an import tariff quota for frozen thin skirt of bovine animals falling within CN code 0206 29 91 (2), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 996/97 fixes the amount of frozen thin skirt which may be imported on special terms in 2004/2005 at 800 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 996/97 fixes the amount of frozen thin skirt which may be imported on special terms in 2004/2005 at 800 tonnes.

| (2) | Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 996/97 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 996/97 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import licences made pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 996/97 are hereby met to the extent of 0,48756 % of the quantity requested.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 144, 4.6.1997, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 1995 / Corrections 20307

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

[Dept. Circ. 570, 1994 Rev., Supp. No. 17]

Surety Companies Acceptable on

Federal Bonds, American Reliable

Insurance Company

Correction

In notice document 95–8496

appearing on page 17609 in the issue of

Thursday, April 6, 1995 make the

following correction:

On page 17609, in the second column,

in the first full paragraph, in the eighth

line, ‘‘HH’’ should read ‘‘NH’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Timothy Andrew GAVIN v. STATE

CR-15-1402

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

Reh. denied.
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2
. 2 Page 1 of 1 8/28/2011 

### AD Title: Turbochargers Docket No. FAA

- 2008
- 0314 Directorate Identifier: 2008
- NE
- 09
- AD **Costs:** Costs per **Product** (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

h ours Labor cost ( @ $80/ho ur) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U
. S
. Fleet Applicability inspection 1.0 $ 80.00 $0 $ 80.00 620 $ 49,600 Gap m easurement 3.0 $ 240.00 $0 $ 240.00 310 $ 74,400 Turbocharger replacement 4.0 $ 320.00 $2,500 $ 2,820.00 62 $ 174,840 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U
. S
. fleet: $ 298,840



### Costs covered under warranty **Special considerations for Econom**  **ic Analysis :**  Estimated r eject rate fro m gap measurement not to exceed 20 percent. 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO
**Intrastate Avi ation in Alaska:**  This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAUL REAL ESTATE, INC. and PAUL DE BASTOS
, Appellant s ,

v.

CHRISTIAN TIRIKIAN
, Appellee.

No. 4D2022

- 2358

[ November 16, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Fabienne E. Fahnestock, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE15

- 011435 (18).

William E

. Stacey, Jr., of William E. Stacey, Jr., P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appel lants

.

Paul A . McKenna of Paul A. McKenna & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      May 17, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Samuel ShengSamuel
      Sheng
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                (principal financial and
      accounting
      officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Preliminary implications of viscoelastic ray theory for anelastic seismic tomography models              

      April 4, 2024    

The recent developments in general viscoelastic ray theory provide a rigorous mathematical framework for anelastic seismic tomography. They provide closed‐form solutions of forward ray‐tracing and simple inverse problems for anelastic horizontal and spherical layered media with material gradients. They provide ray‐tracing computation algorithms valid for all angles of incidence that account for changes in wave speed, attenuation, and trajectory of anelastic P and S body waves induced by anelastic boundaries. They account for theoretical predictions that seismic waves refract as inhomogeneous waves across anelastic boundaries for all angles of incidence, which in turn accounts for energy carried by plane waves along seismic boundaries at head wave critical angles and wide‐angle refracted (WAR) ray paths that are not predicted by elastic models. Exact viscoelastic ray‐tracing numerical results for various models provide examples that illustrate the effects of anelastic boundaries on the travel times and amplitudes of seismic waves. They show the effects are strongly dependent on angle of incidence. For near‐critical and wide angles of incidence the anelastic effects on travel times and amplitudes can be large and are not explained by elastic ray theory, but the effects on travel times can be relatively small and difficult to distinguish from those for elastic media for pre‐near‐critical angles of incidence. The results for some models indicate that reflected anelastic WAR waves may be observable at the surface and possibly account for some prominent seismic arrivals not explained by elasticity. These preliminary results suggest that the application of exact viscoelastic ray‐tracing computation algorithms to exploration and teleseismic data sets can reveal new insights regarding the properties and distribution of anelastic materials in the Earth.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Roger Borcherdt

##### Scientist Emeritus

Earthquake Hazards Program

borcherdt@usgs.gov

650-644-8946

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Roger BorcherdtScientist EmeritusEarthquake Hazards ProgramEmailborcherdt@usgs.govPhone650-644-8946 

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Case Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael Schaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Lawrence Schaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Michael Schaffer

/s/ Lawrence SchafferBy: Michael Schaffer
Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2009

By: Lawrence Schaffer
Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2009
Agreement dated as of February 21, 2012 with Mark G. Papa


 Exhibit 10.1 
 AGREEMENT 
 This Agreement, entered into as of February 21, 2012, is
by and between EOG Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”), and Mark G. Papa (“Employee”). 
 WHEREAS, Employer and Employee have entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of June 15, 2005, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement, dated effective as of March 16, 2009, by and between Employer and Employee (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Employer and Employee now desire to terminate the Employment Agreement and the respective rights and obligations of Employer and Employee thereunder, with such termination to be subject to the
approval of, and effective as of the date of approval of, this Agreement by the Board of Directors of Employer pursuant to Section 7.8 of the Employment Agreement (such date of approval, the “Effective Date”); 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and in consideration of other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy, sufficiency
and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged (and which consideration Employer and Employee hereby acknowledge and agree shall be deemed to include (but not be limited to) the reciprocal surrender by Employer and Employee of their respective rights
under the Employment Agreement and the corresponding reciprocal release of Employer and Employee from their respective obligations under the Employment Agreement, in each case by way of this Agreement), Employer and Employee hereby agree that the
Employment Agreement and the respective rights and obligations of Employer and Employee thereunder are hereby released and terminated effective as of the Effective Date. 
 This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Texas, excluding any conflict-of-law rule or principle that might refer the construction of this Agreement to the laws of
another State or country. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth
above and to be effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

	
	EOG RESOURCES, INC.
	
	By: /s/ Patricia L. Edwards
	Name: Patricia L. Edwards
	Title: Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
	
	MARK G. PAPA
	
	/s/ Mark G. Papa
# L_2004370EN.01004001.xml

| 17.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 370/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 370/40

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2152/2004

of 16 December 2004

repealing Regulation (EC) No 238/2004 opening an invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on sorghum imported into Spain from third countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 of 26 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal (2) lays down the specific rules required for carrying out invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 of 26 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of tariff quotas for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain and imports of maize into Portugal (2) lays down the specific rules required for carrying out invitations to tender.

| (2) | For economic reasons, the invitation to tender provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 238/2004 (3) should be cancelled. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

For economic reasons, the invitation to tender provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 238/2004 (3) should be cancelled.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 238/2004 is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 23.

3

---
Case 19-22760-RAM Doc 8 Filed 09/25/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-22760-RAM Doc 8 Filed 09/25/19 Page 2 of 2
J 

.. ~ .. o' 

Alamogordo-White Sands Regional Airport 

3500 Airport Road 

Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310 November 6, 2014 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer, 

As you aware, The Alamogordo White Sands Regional Airport, (KALM)/ Holloman AFB terminated its EAS 

eligibility on March 31 of 2012 because of exceeding the $1 ,000 per passenger subsidy. At the time, the 

communities of Alamogordo and Holloman AFB met all requirements for EAS eligibility. 

Due to the loss of subsidized service in 2012, the subsidy per passenger will be $0 in each community for 

fiscal year 2013 and 2014. To the best of our knowledge, the communities continue to meet the other 

requirements for subsidized service under the EAS program. 

As such, we respectfully request the Department issue a request for proposals to provide subsidized service 

between the Alamogordo White Sands Regional Airport (KALM) and the Dallas Fort Worth (KDFW) to 

begin as soon as feasible. 

Sincerely, 

Jim Talbert 

Alamogordo Airport Manager
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The morphology and chronology of a landslide near Dillon Dam, Dillon, Colorado      

      January 1, 1969    

Investigations were made of a landslide at the Dillon Dam site, Dillon, Colo., that included detailed laboratory and field analyses of the mineralogy, chemistry, and physical properties of landslide materials and the bedrock formations from which they were derived. These investigations provide an understanding of the relative importance of various factors contributing to the origin and reactivation of a landslide in overburden resting on the Morrison Formation. The landslide material consists dominantly of an aggregate of large to small angular fragments of quartzite and sandstone from the Dakota Formation, embedded in a matrix of very fine grained to colloidal clayey substances derived mainly from the upper, noncalcareous portion of the Morrison Formation.

During construction of Dillon Dam and associated structures, excavation of the toe of an old, relatively stable landslide adjacent to the left abutment caused renewed movement that threatened engulfment of the intake structure at the portal of the diversion tunnel for the reservoir. Remedial measures included excavation of a large volume of the landslide material and construction of a gravel-fill coffer- dam on bedrock at the toe of the landslide.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Dillon dam
                  - Colorado

View All **