alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DENIED and Opinion F iled November 17, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01218-CV IN RE TINA CHAPMAN AND VI NSON CHAPMAN, Relators Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-07021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Goldstein On November 15, 2022, relators file d a petition seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to hold hearin gs on relators’ September 6, 2022 “Motion, Pursuant to Rule 306a, to Determine Date on Which Notice of Judgment Was Received or Actual Knowledge of Judgment Was Acquired” (the Rule 306a Motion) and September 6, 2022 “Motion for New Tr ial, Motion for Reconsideration, and Motion to Reform and Correct Judgment.” On November 16, 2022, relators filed an amended petition seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to hold a hearing on only relators’ Rule 306a Motion. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires re lators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that rela tors lack an adequate appellate remedy. In–2– re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relators’ am ended petition and the record before us, we conclude that relators have failed to demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny relators’ am ended petition for wr it of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). Further, based on our revi ew, the appendices attached to relators’ petition and amended petition contain unredacted sensitiv e information, including a driver’s license number and the full names, birthda tes, and home addre sses of minors, in violation of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike relators’ Pe tition for Writ of Mandamus and Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus, including their attached appendices.

221218F.P05 /Bonnie Lee Goldstein / BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
Jamil Eugene FIELDS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1138

MONICA JEFFRIES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paula Xinis , District Judge , and Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge . ( 8:19

- cv - 01816

- CBD )

Submitted : August 31, 2022 Decided: September 23, 2022

Before MOTZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Monica Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1138 Doc: 24 Filed: 09/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Monica Jeffries appeals the district court’s and magistrate judge’s orders gran ting summary judgment in favor of the Federal Emergency Management Agency on Jeffries’ employment discrimination and retaliation claims

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appealed

- from orders

. See Jeffr ies v.
FEMA , No

. 8 :19

- cv - 01816

- CBD ( D. Md

. July 24, 2020 ; Dec. 20, 2021 ). We grant Jeffries’ pending motion to the extent it seeks permission to file a supplemental informal brief, but deny the motion to the extent that Jeffries requests oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq uately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1138 Doc: 24 Filed: 09/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 105 (Thursday, June 1, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 28657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-100601]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Rel. No. IC-21015; 811-7133]


SSL 1993-1 Trust; Notice of Application

April 17, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-9985 appearing on page 20139 in the issue of 
Monday, April 24, 1995, the docket number should read as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3677 

To make a technical correction to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 

1973. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2012 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and 

passed 

A BILL 

To make a technical correction to the Flood Disaster 

Protection Act of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

4 Section 102(d)(1)(A) of the Flood Disaster Protec5 tion Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)(1)(A)) is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘residential’’ before ‘‘improved real estate’’ 

7 each place that term appears. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges 

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with the Forest Service on 3/25/16, to obtain information on the Forest Service’s programs to 

reduce stormwater runoff from forest roads. The Forest Service described its work in using BMPs to 

prevent stormwater runoff. The Forest Service also described its work to prioritize forest road areas for 

monitoring and the budgetary constraints that limit its work.
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 13-1 Filed 11/22/19 Page 1 of 1
NO. 12-22-00281-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF

RAYMOND GARRETT STRBAN,

AN INCAPACITATED ADULT

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. 

Shawna Benge filed a notice of appeal on October 20, 2022. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, her

docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time appeal was perfected. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 32.1. That same day, this Court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement 

within ten days if she had not already done so. Appellant did not file a docketing statement as

requested.

 On November 2, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice advising Appellant that her

docketing statement was past due. The notice provided that unless the docketing statement was 

filed on or before November 14, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. Appellant did not file the required docketing statement 

or otherwise respond to this Court’s notice.

Accordingly, because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal 

is dismissed.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (after giving ten days’ notice, appellate court may 

dismiss appeal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a 

1 We also note that Appellant’s notice of appeal fails to contain the information specifically required by

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal 

must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record).
court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified 

time).

Opinion delivered November 17, 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 17, 2022

NO. 12-22-00281-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF RAYMOND GARRETT STRBAN,

AN INCAPACITATED ADULT

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 017-17-G)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended January 31, 2011, the undersigned Garth Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 8, 2011
   
 /s/ Garth Wong
 Garth Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer
   
 25
CITY OF FLORENCE v. CODY

CR-15-1346

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

On reh. ex mero motu:

Yarbrough opinion of 03/17/2017 withdrawn; memo substituted; affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 06-44]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 06-44 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: August 1, 2006.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 47186)          ( print page 47187)          ( print page 47188)    

# Editorial Note:

FR Doc. 06-6727 was originally published at page 44634 in the issue of Monday, August 7, 2006. In that publication a graphic was improperly substituted. The corrected document is republished in its entirety.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

[FR Doc. R6-6727 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-C
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

48749

Vol. 60, No. 182

Wednesday, September 20, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Commission

[A-580-812]

Dynamic Random Access Memory

Semiconductors of One Megabit or

Above From the Republic of Korea;

Preliminary Results of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review

Correction

In notice document 95–22501

beginning on page 47149 in the issue of

Monday, September 11, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 47152, in the first column, in

the table, in the second column, in the

entry corresponding to ‘‘Samsung

Electronics Co., Ltd’’ remove ‘‘(de

minimis)’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP94-267-006]

Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.;

Notice of Filing of Refund Report

August 8, 1995

Correction

In notice document 95–19965

appearing on page 41886, in the issue of

Monday, August 14, 1995, the docket

number is corrected as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 400 and 411

[BPD-482-FC]

RIN 0938-AD73

Medicare Program; Medicare

Secondary Payer for Individuals

Entitled to Medicare and Also Covered

Under Group Health Plans

Correction

In rule document 95–21265 beginning

on page 45344 in the issue of Thursday,

August 31, 1995, in the second column,

under DATES, beginning in the second

line, ‘‘October 2, 1995’’ should read

‘‘September 29, 1995’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ANM-11]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Salt

Lake City, Utah

Correction

In rule document 95–18917,

appearing on page 39247 in the issue of

Wednesday, August 2, 1995, make the

following corrections:

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

1. On the same page, in the third

column, in the 32nd line, insert ‘‘east’’

after ‘‘airspace’’.

2. On the same page, in the third

column, in the 38th line, ‘‘east’’ should

read ‘‘west ’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Blackhawk Fund, a Nevada
corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Frank Marshik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/ Frank
Marshik
 __________________________
 Frank
Marshik,
 President
 (Chief
Executive Officer and
 Chief
Financial Officer)
 November
16, 2009
William J. GURNEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1436

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellant to comply with this court's order of April 16, 2018, requiring the filing of an amended notice of appeal.

KELLY, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 202 (Thursday, October 19, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54106-54107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-11019]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 1, 16, 31, 57, 153, 160, and 161

[CGD 95-072]
RIN 2115 AF21


Technical Amendments; Organizational Changes; Miscellaneous 
Editorial Changes and Conforming Amendments

Correction

    In rule document 95-24176, beginning on page 50455, in the issue of 
September 29, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 1.01-10  [Corrected]

     1. On page 50458, 2d column, in Sec. 1.01-10(b)(1), 15th line, 
``investigations'' should read ``Investigations,'' and 33d line, 
``officers'' should read ``Officers''.
     2. On page 50459, 1st column, in Sec. 16.205(b)(1)(ii)(B), 21st 
line, ``bringing'' should read ``bridging''.


Sec. 16.205  [Corrected]

     3. On page 50461, first column, amendatory instruction 48 to 
Sec. 16.205, ``(G-MNI)'' should read ``(GMMI)''.


Sec. 16.500  [Corrected]

     4. On page 50461, first column, amendatory instruction 49 to 
Sec. 16.500, ``(G-MNI)'' should read ``(G-MMI)''.


Sec. 31.10-21  [Corrected]

     5. On page 50461, second column, amendatory instruction 62 to 
Sec. 31.10-21, ``Sec. 31.10.-21'' should read ``Sec. 31.10-21''.


Sec. 57.201-1  [Corrected]

     6. On page 50462, third column, section heading, ``Sec. 57.201-1'' 
should read ``Sec. 57.021-1''.


Sec. 90.35-5  [Corrected]

     7. On page 50464, first column, amendatory instruction 124 to 
Sec. 90.35-5, ``Eisenhower Drive'' should read ``45 Eisenhower Drive''.


Sec. 153.7  [Corrected]

     8. On page 50465, third column, amendatory instruction 173 to 
Sec. 153.7, change (a), ``(b)(4)(ii)'' should read ``(b)(4)(iii)''.

[[Page 54107]]



Sec. 160.010-4  [Corrected]

     9. On page 50466, third column, amendatory instruction 181 to 
Sec. 160.010-4, ``(G-MVI)'' should read ``(G-MVI-3)''.


Sec. 160.060-1  [Corrected]

     10. On page 50467, first column, amendatory instruction 187(w) to 
Sec. 160.060-1, ``Section 160.060-(c)(1)'' should read ``Section 
160.060-1(c)(1)''.


Sec. 161.010-1  [Corrected]

     11. On page 50467, second column, amendatory instruction 193 to 
Sec. 161.010-1, ``Sec. 161.101-1(a)'' should read ``Sec. 161.010-
1(a)''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 2137

In re: KEENAN KESTER COFIELD, a/k/a Berri A. Wells , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 20

- 16090 )

Submitted : February 18, 2021 Decided: February 22, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Keenan Kester Cofield , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keenan Kester Cofield petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the bankruptcy court has unduly delayed acting on multiple motions in relation to his Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition

. He seeks an order from this court directing the bankruptcy court to
act on those motions and to stay his case pending the resolution of th e motions and any subsequent petition s . Our review of the bankruptcy court’s docket reveals that the court
denied the motions on November 13, 2020

. B ecause the bankruptcy cour t has recently ruled on Cofield’s motions , we deny as moot the portion of his mandamus petition seeking an order directing the court to act and staying the case pending the resolution of th e motions

. We also deny the portion of the mandamus petition seeking an order staying the case pending the resolution of any subsequent petitions, as Cofield is not entitled to such
relief. See In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) ( stating stan dard ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-24331-BKC-PGH 

 CHAPTER 13 

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. 

__________________________/ 

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM NO. 1-1

 

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the Chapter 13 consent calendar on March 2, 2020 on 

the Debtor’s Objection to Claim Number 1-1 (DE 29), and there being no objections otherwise 

raised, it is, therefore 

 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Court sustains the Debtor’s Objection to Claim of Westside Regional Medical Center 

(Claim No. 1-1). 

2. Westside Regional Medical Center’s claim shall be stricken in its entirety. 

 ###

Submitted by: 

Law Offices of Michael H. Johnson, P.A. 

3601 W. Commercial Blvd. Suite 31 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

(954) 535-1131 

(954) 641-7750 fax 

Michael H. Johnson is directed to serve copies of this order on all interested parties and file a 

certificate of service. 

Paul G. Hyman, Jr.,Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 4, 2020.

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 51 Filed 03/04/20 Page 1 of 1
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2892 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or preserved 

by vinegar or acetic acid, in immediate containers holding more than 

3.4 kg. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in immediate containers holding more than 3.4 kg. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPERS, PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VIN4 EGAR OR ACETIC ACID, IN IMMEDIATE CON5 TAINERS HOLDING MORE THAN 3.4 KG. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.28 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 capers, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, 

9 in immediate containers holding more than 3.4 kg) is 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2892 IS

1 amended by striking the date in the effective period col2 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 5957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30131]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------