alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3618 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3618

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2012

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jury Access for Capable Citizens and 
Equality in Service Selection Act of 2012'' or the ``Jury ACCESS Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION 
              OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex,''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50307

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLIE LEE FRANKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. CR-A-93-104

- - - - - - - - - -

June 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charlie Lee Franks appeals the sentence imposed at

resentencing following his guilty-plea conviction for possession

of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession of a firearm

by a convicted felon, and money laundering. Franks contends that

the district court clearly erred in finding that he violated the

conditions of his release and denying him a three-level reduction

for acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1 of the U.S.
No. 95-50307

- 2 -

Sentencing Guidelines. The district court’s determination that

Franks violated the conditions of his release was supported by

reliable information in the Presentence Report. United States v.

Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). It was not improper for

the district court to deny a reduction for acceptance of

responsibility based on Franks’ failure to comply with the

conditions of his release. See United States v. Hooten, 942 F.2d

878, 882-83 (5th Cir. 1991).

Franks also argues that the district court clearly erred in 

determining that he was an organizer or leader in criminal

activity involving five or more participants and increasing his

offense level by four points under § 3B1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines. The district court’s determination that Franks’

drug-trafficking scheme involved five individuals including

Franks was supported by reliable information contained in the

Presentence Report. See Vital, 68 F.3d at 120. The district

court did not clearly err in determining that Franks’ offense

level should be increased due to his role as an organizer or

leader in the overall drug-trafficking scheme pursuant to

§ 3B1.1. See United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 769 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 246 (1993).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3654 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3654

        To create equal footing for tribal economic development.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2012

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To create equal footing for tribal economic development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GAMING ACTIVITIES.

    Section 207 of Public Law 100-89 (25 U.S.C. 737) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 1 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 2 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 3 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 4 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 5 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 6 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 7 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 8 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 9 of 10
Case 20-01089-RAM Doc 13 Filed 05/11/20 Page 10 of 10
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 5
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1485

___________________________

Harry Meyer Katz

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: October 31, 2012

Filed: November 30, 2012

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Former federal inmate Harry Katz appeals the district court’s denial of his

1

petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We agree with the court that Katz may not

The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the Eastern District of Missouri.
raise in a coram nobis petition the same claims that he previously litigated in his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333, 338 (1992) (successive

habeas petition raising identical grounds as prior petition must generally be

dismissed); United States v. Comacho-Bordes, 94 F.3d 1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996)

(coram nobis relief issubstantially equivalent to habeas relief, and principles barring

successive petitions apply); Azzone v. United States, 341 F.2d 417, 418-19 (8th Cir.

1965) (per curiam) (coramnobis petitioner is not entitled to review ofissuesthat were

considered and resolved either on direct appeal or in § 2255 motion). We also find

that the district court did not err in denying the petition without a hearing or

discovery. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, June 11, 2009 and Friday, June 12, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives Issue Committee will be held Thursday, June 11, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, June 12, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Central Time in Dallas, TX. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-9877 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Numerical model for learning concepts of streamflow simulation      

      January 1, 1993    

Numerical models are useful for demonstrating principles of open-channel flow. Such models can allow experimentation with cause-and-effect relations, testing concepts of physics and numerical techniques. Four PT is a numerical model written primarily as a teaching supplement for a course in one-dimensional stream-flow modeling. Four PT options particularly useful in training include selection of governing equations, boundary-value perturbation, and user-programmable constraint equations. The model can simulate non-trivial concepts such as flow in complex interconnected channel networks, meandering channels with variable effective flow lengths, hydraulic structures defined by unique three-parameter relations, and density-driven flow.The model is coded in FORTRAN 77, and data encapsulation is used extensively to simplify maintenance and modification and to enhance the use of Four PT modules by other programs and programmers.

## Citation Information
14466 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 52 / Friday, March 17, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–6660 Filed 3–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–C
Exhibit 31.1

           Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Mario J. Gabelli, certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Lynch  Interactive
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are  responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 14, 2004

/s/ Mario J. Gabelli
-----------------------
Mario J. Gabelli
Chief Executive Officer
'$.BSLFUQMBDF
--$

 


$SZTUBM+POFT0TXBME
&TRVJSF

"UUPSOFZT"HFOUGPS$SFEJUPS

'$.BSLFUQMBDF
--$"DDPVOU&OEJOH$&%

DP#FDLFU-FF--1

10#PY
.BMWFSO
1"

0DUPCFS




9

"DDFQUFEbased on proposal ofGVMMQBZNFOUPG'$.BSLFUQMBDF
--$hT claim at $1,071.13 over 60 months as 

proposed on Page 5 of the Plan.

Case 19-25705-SMG Doc 101 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**























**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO** **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Blackhawk Fund, a Nevada
      corporation (the Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent Fouch, Secretary, Treasurer, Pricipal Accounting
      Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Dated:
      May 9, 2007




/s/ Brent
      Fouch





Brent
      Fouch, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and
      Director
# EUR-Lex - 32004M3549 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32004M3549

**Commission Decision of 16/09/2004 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3549 - KKR / DLJ / JOSTENS - VON HOFFMANN - ARCADE) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 16/09/2004

SG-Greffe(2004) D/204041-42

To the notifying parties

Dear Sirs,

Subject : Case No. COMP/M. 3549 – KKR / DLJ / JOSTENS - VON HOFFMANN -ARCADE Notification of 18/08/2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 214 dated 26/08/2004, page 4

1. On 18/08/2004 , the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/20041 by which the undertakings Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. ("KKR"; USA) and DLJ Merchant Banking III, Inc. ("DLJ "; USA), which belongs to the Credit Suisse group ("CS"; Switzerland), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council regulation joint control over the undertakings Jostens, Inc. ("Jostens", USA), The Von Hoffmann Corporation ("Von Hoffmann", USA) and AKI, Inc. ("Arcade", USA) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for KKR: financial investment;

- for DLJ: financial investment;

- for CS: banking and insurance;

- for Jostens products for school-related celebrations;

- for Von Hoffmann: printing of educational textbooks;

- for Arcade: marketing services.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph b of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Mario MONTI Member of the Commission

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 60280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[(EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0124) FRL 9901-68-OA]

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Cancellation Notice of Public 
Advisory Committee teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Cancellation of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA announced in the Federal Register on May 17, 2013 [FRL-
9814-6] a Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) public 
teleconference. Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, EPA is giving notice of cancellation of that public meeting 
for the Good Neighbor Environmental Board. GNEB is a federal advisory 
committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 92463. 
GNEB provides advice and recommendations to the President and Congress 
on environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with 
Mexico.

DATES: The teleconference scheduled for Tuesday, October 1, 2013 has 
been cancelled because the meeting is not needed at this time. The 
meeting will be rescheduled at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mark Joyce, Acting Designated 
Federal Officer, joyce.mark@epa.gov, (202) 564-2130. General 
information about GNEB can be found on its Web site at www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb.

    Dated: September 26, 2013.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-24073 Filed 9-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 39 40 41 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/04 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHARON HAMPTON,

Appellant,

v.

HOLLYWOOD TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,

a Florida corporation not-for-profit,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-801

[April 19, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mily Rodriguez Powell, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE06-

005188 (03).

Robert F. Reynolds of Slatkin & Reynolds, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Robert P. Gossett of Gossett & Gossett, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
This form is intentionally blank.

The notice is scheduled to be processed by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC).

Refer to the BNC Certificate of Notice entry to view the actual form.

Case 20-13104-PDR Doc 42-1 Filed 04/20/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 19-22364-BKC-RAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

MICHAEL JOHN HISCANO

_____________________________/

NOTICE CONTINUING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIRMED PLAN

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the Debtor's Motion to Modify Confirmed Plan has been 

continued to August 17, 2021 at 9:00 AM by TELEPHONE through CourtSoutions LLC. To participate 

through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day 

before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at 

https://www.court-solutions.com If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be made by 

telephone at (917)746-7476.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice Continuing Debtor's 

Motion to Modify Confirmed Plan was mailed to those parties listed on this 29th day of July, 2021.

DEBTOR

_____________________________________ /s/ Nancy K. Neidich

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

Case 19-22364-RAM Doc 72 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 2
 NOTICE CONTINUING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIRMED PLAN

CASE NO.: 19-22364-BKC-RAM

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

NANCY K. NEIDICH

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

DEBTOR

MICHAEL JOHN HISCANO

2020 NW 97TH STREET

MIAMI, FL 33147

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

MANDY L. MILLS, ESQUIRE

4343 W FLAGLER STREET

SUITE 100

MIAMI, FL 33134

MANDY L. MILLS, ESQUIRE IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAIL A CONFORMED COPY OF THIS 

NOTICE TO ALL CREDITORS AND INTERESTED PARTIES IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT 

THEREOF.

Case 19-22364-RAM Doc 72 Filed 07/29/21 Page 2 of 2