alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 19-24100-RAM

YANIA CASTRO BUSTAMANTE CHAPTER 7

Debtor,

________________________________/

MOTION TO ALLOW LATE-FILED REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT

Debtor, YANIA CASTRO BUSTAMANTE, by and through the undersigned attorney and 

files this Motion to Allow Late-Filed Reaffirmation Agreement and as grounds for this Motion 

would state as follows:

1. Debtor filed her Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on October 1, 2019.

2. Debtor has a first mortgage on his homestead property which she is retaining and 

reaffirming, and this mortgage is serviced by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC.

(hereinafter “Creditor”)

3. The Debtor has been in communication with the Creditor about the reaffirmation 

agreement on her homestead.

4. Due to the circumstances of Coronavirus pandemic, the reaffirmation agreement has 

not been timely filed.

5. The Debtor received her discharge on April 15, 2020. DE 42

6. Both parties, especially Debtor YANIA CASTRO BUSTAMANTE would be highly 

prejudiced if the Reaffirmation Agreement is not allowed and approved. 

7. The present motion is made in good faith and not with the intention to delay the 

present case.

8. No creditor will be affected if this court grants the present motion.

. 

WHEREFORE, Debtor, YANIA CASTRO BUSTAMANTE requests from this court to 

allow the late-filed reaffirmation agreement, approve the reaffirmation agreement and for such 

Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 44 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 3
further relief as the court deems necessary.

CORONA LAW FIRM, P.A.

/s/ Ricardo Corona, Esq

RICARDO CORONA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 111333

3899 NW 7 Street, Suite 202-B

Miami, FL 33126

(305) 266-1150 Phone 

(888) 554-5607 Fax

bk@coronapa.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing motion was sent via USPS Mail, 

Certified Mail or electronic transmission to every party on the attached Matrix and all others set forth 

in the NEF dated this 23th day of April 2020.

CORONA LAW FIRM, P.A.

/s/ Ricardo Corona, Esq

RICARDO CORONA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 111333

3899 NW 7 Street, Suite 202-B

Miami, FL 33126

(305) 547-1234 Phone 

(888) 554-5607 FaX

Certificate of Mailing

Case No. 19-24100-RAM

Sent by Electronic Notice

Office of U.S. Trustee

51 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 1204

Miami, FL 33130

Sent by Electronic Notice and Email

Joel L. Tabas – Chapter 7 Trustee

Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 44 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 3
Tabas & Soloff, P.A.

Attorneys for Trustee

25 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 248

Miami, FL 33131

Email: jtabas@tabasscoloff.com

 jgraham@tabasscoloff.com

 jcepero@tabasscoloff.com

Sent by U.S. Mail

Yania Castro Bustamante

11716 SW 18 Street, Apt 206

Miami, FL 33175-1692

Sent by U.S. Certified Mail

PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

Attn: Standford L. Lurland – Manager

3043 Townsgate Road, Suite 200

Westlake Village, CA 91361

Sent by U.S. Certified Mail

PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

CT Corporation System – Registered Agent

1200 South Pine Island Road

Plantation, FL 33324

Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 44 Filed 04/24/20 Page 3 of 3
October 1, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RICHARD A. DUNSMORE, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00385-CV V.

BRAD LIVINGSTON ET AL, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on April 8, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Richard A. Dunsmore.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Medical Institute, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quaarter ended  September 30, 2400, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Thomas Stanley Babcock, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and Director of
the Company,  certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the  "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: November 5, 2004                   By:  /s/ THOMAS STANLEY BABCOCK
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Thomas Stanley Babcock
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director
Fw: Request for your assistance

Kathy Kaufman t

o

: Lydia Wegman 11/24/2009 01:54 PM

Cc: Tricia Crabtree

Lydia -- I hit send before realizing I hadn't added your name in the cc box, so I apologize.

Tricia -- I also realized I forgot to cc you. I'm sorry!

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C439-02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone 919 541 0102

Fax 919 541 5489

----- Forwarded by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/24/2009 01:52 PM -----

From: Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: David Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy

Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lillian Bradley/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron

Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/24/2009 01:50 PM

Subject: Fw: Request for your assistance

Heidi - We ran this by Lydia, and we'd like to meet to discuss this request on Monday (most of us are out

the rest of this week).

We're concerned about the resources that would be involved in responding to the request, so we'd like to

discuss the reasons for it. The amount of data involved is enormous (much more than you asked for

SO2).

Also, Lydia requests that she be cc'd on RIA-related inquiries.

Thanks. Let us know how you'd like to proceed. (Note I'm actually leaving at 2:45 today, and gone the

rest of the week).

----- Forwarded by Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/24/2009 08:33 AM -----

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/23/2009 05:45 PM

Subject: Request for your assistance

Hi Ron

We appreciate your work ensuring that the public has an opportunity to see

the data underlying the full attainment cost estimates for the SO 2 NAAQS. We

would like to ensure that the public (and we) also have access to comparable

information for the reconsideration of the ozone NAAQS . In that vein we

request that you please send us a spreadsheet providing , for eachnonattainment area (county)

1) the costs and the projected emissions reductions for each emissions

control

2) the emissions cuts necessary to meet different standards , starting from

the 2020 baseline

3) the baseline emissions by sector (e.g., EGU, non EGU, mobile sources)

4) the baseline emissions by fuel source (e.g., coal, natural gas, diesel,

gasoline, aviation fuel, etc.)

Please let me know if you’d like to discuss, or if the request is vague.

Best, as always,

heidi
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 201

In the Interest of L.L.D.R., a child

M.A., Mother, Petitioner and Appellant

v. A.R., Father, Respondent and Appellee

and North Dakota Department of Human Services; Burleigh County Human Service Zone, Respondent s
and

State of North Dakota Child Support Division, Statutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20210130

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorabl e Jason J. Hammes , Judicial Referee.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Alyssa L. Lovas, Bismarck, N

. D

., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, N

. D

., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.1 Interest of L.L.D.R. No. 20210130

Per Curiam

. [¶1] M.A. , the mother of L.L.D.R., appeals from a juvenile court order declining to terminate the parental rights of A.R., the father of L.L.D.R. The juvenile court found that A.R. “has not abandoned the child and it is not in the child’s best interest that his parental rights be terminate d at this time.” On appeal, M.A. argues that the juvenile court erred in finding L.L.D.R. is not an abandoned child and that the court erred in dismissing M.A.’s petition to terminate A.R.’s parental rights. W e conclude that the juvenile court did not
abus e its discretion in its decision to deny termination of A.R.’s parental rights because M.A. did not “establish[] that denying the petition would seriously affect the child’s welfare.” Interest of B.H ., 2018 ND 178, ¶ 6, 915 N.W.2d 668.
Because this issue i s dispositive, we decline to address other issues raised on appeal. W

e summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)( 4)

.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Case 19-22760-RAM Doc 23 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF B. GRANT HUNTER

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal
Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, B. Grant Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/ B. Grant Hunter
                                          ----------------------------
                                          B. Grant Hunter
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 13, 2004
Case 19-23832-AJC Doc 1 Filed 10/15/19 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-23832-AJC Doc 1 Filed 10/15/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-23832-AJC Doc 1 Filed 10/15/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-23832-AJC Doc 1 Filed 10/15/19 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit
23.1





RYDER
      SCOTT COMPANY
              
              
              FAX(303) 623-4258PETROLEUM
      CONSULTANTS621
      SEVENTEENTH STREET
              SUITE
      1550
              DENVER,
      COLORADO 80293
              TELEPHONE
      (303) 623-9147
  Exhibit
No. 23.1
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
 As
independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the
reference of our name in the Report on Form 10-K
for the years ending December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of PDC-2004B(the
"Partnership"). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in the
Partnership, or in any affiliate. We have not been employed on a contingent
basis, and we are not connected with the Partnership, or any affiliate as a
promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee or
affiliate.
 /s/  
      RYDER
      SCOTT COMPANY, L PRYDER
      SCOTT COMPANY, L P
    
  1100
      LOUISIANA SUITE 3800
              HOUSTON.
      TEXAS 77002-5218
              TEL
      (713)651-9191
              FAX
      (713) 651-08491200,
      530-8TH AVENUE, S.W.
              CALGARY,
      ALBERTA T2P 358
              TEL(403)
      262-2799
              FAX
      (403) 262-2790
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Location, structure, and seismicity of the Seattle fault zone, Washington: Evidence from aeromagnetic anomalies, geologic mapping, and seismic-reflection data      

      January 1, 2002    

A high-resolution aeromagnetic survey of the Puget Lowland shows details of the Seattle fault zone, an active but largely concealed east-trending zone of reverse faulting at the southern margin of the Seattle basin. Three elongate, east-trending magnetic anomalies are associated with north-dipping Tertiary strata exposed in the hanging wall; the magnetic anomalies indicate where these strata continue beneath glacial deposits. The northernmost anomaly, a narrow, elongate magnetic high, precisely correlates with magnetic Miocene volcanic conglomerate. The middle anomaly, a broad magnetic low, correlates with thick, nonmagnetic Eocene and Oligocene marine and fluvial strata. The southern anomaly, a broad, complex magnetic high, correlates with Eocene volcanic and sedimentary rocks. This tripartite package of anomalies is especially clear over Bainbridge Island west of Seattle and over the region east of Lake Washington. Although attenuated in the intervening region, the pattern can be correlated with the mapped strike of beds following a northwest-striking anticline beneath Seattle. The aeromagnetic and geologic data define three main strands of the Seattle fault zone identified in marine seismic-reflection profiles to be subparallel to mapped bedrock trends over a distance of >50 km. The locus of faulting coincides with a diffuse zone of shallow crustal seismicity and the region of uplift produced by the M 7 Seattle earthquake of A.D. 900-930.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Richard Blakely

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

blakely@usgs.gov

650-439-2316

#### Ray Wells

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

rwells@usgs.gov

## Related Content

#### Richard Blakely

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

blakely@usgs.gov

650-439-2316

#### Ray Wells

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

rwells@usgs.gov

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Washington

View All **
exv10w3



 





EXHIBIT 10.3




2008

KEY EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN

SCOTT’S LIQUID GOLD-INC.




Purpose of the Plan




     The purpose of the Key Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide incentive to
the Company’s key executives to maximize corporate earnings for 2008 and to reward such executives
based upon performance.



     Structure of the Plan



     This Plan is constructed to reserve exclusively to the shareholders the first $1 million in
pre-tax earnings. Thereafter, a bonus equal to 10% of pre-tax earnings in excess of $1 million
will be paid as an incentive bonus to key executives.



     This Plan is also constructed so as to encourage Management to expend every effort possible to
increase pre-tax earnings in excess of $1 million. The more pre-tax profit the Company makes, the
greater the bonus and the greater the return to the Company’s shareholders. Further, by not
capping bonuses to be paid under this Plan, the Board of Directors believes that the incentives to
the Company’s executives to make larger and larger profits will not be limited.



     Plan Provisions



     1. For 2008, a bonus pool equal to 10% of pre-tax earnings in excess of $1 million will be set
aside for distribution to the Company’s key executives who are employed by the Company at December
31, 2008.



     2. Partial distributions of the bonus pool may be made in December of 2008, but the final
distribution is only to be made after the close of the year, based upon audited pre-tax profits,
during the quarter following the close of the fiscal year.



     3. Bonuses, if any, for 2008, will be divided among the Company’s four executive officers as
follows: President and Chief Executive Officer, 31%; Vice President-Marketing and Sales, 25%;
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, 22%; and Vice President-Operations and Corporate Secretary,
22%.



     4. For purposes of this Plan, net pre-tax earnings and pre-tax profits shall be determined
without the deduction or addition of gains or losses from infrequent or unusual events or
transactions or from extraordinary items. The exclusion of any such event, transaction or item
shall be determined by action of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company after reviewing the proposed or final statements of income of the Company for the relevant
period and reviewing the accounting treatment of any such event, transaction or item by the
Company’s independent accountants.
ex10-9.htm


    


    Exhibit
10.9

    


    Current Director Fee
Arrangements

    


    Directors
of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $750, which
is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options
which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's
2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a
monthly fee of $1,750. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank
are the same individuals. As the sole director of Great Southern Financial
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, William V. Turner, the
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank, receives a
monthly fee of $600 for his service on that board. The directors of Bancorp and
its subsidiaries are not paid any fees for committee service and are not
reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee
meetings.
Samuel D. HART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3559 

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

change the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule with 

respect to certain farms. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. CONRAD, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mr. 

INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency to change the Spill Prevention, Control, and 

Countermeasure rule with respect to certain farms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Undertake 

5 Environmental Land Stewardship Act’’ or the ‘‘FUELS 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, 

8 AND COUNTERMEASURE RULE. 

9 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3559 IS

1 (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis2 trator’’ means the Administrator of the Environ3 mental Protection Agency. 

4 (2) FARM.—The term ‘‘farm’’ has the meaning 

5 given the term in section 112.2 of title 40, Code of 

6 Federal Regulations (or successor regulations). 

7 (3) GALLON.—The term ‘‘gallon’’ means a 

8 United States liquid gallon. 

9 (4) SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUN10 TERMEASURE RULE.—The term ‘‘Spill Prevention, 

11 Control, and Countermeasure rule’’ means the regu12 lation promulgated by the Environmental Protection 

13 Agency under part 112 of title 40, Code of Federal 

14 Regulations. 

15 (b) CERTIFICATION.—In implementing the Spill Pre16 vention, Control, and Countermeasure rule with respect to 

17 any farm, the Administrator shall— 

18 (1) require certification of compliance with the 

19 rule by— 

20 (A) a professional engineer for a farm 

21 with— 

22 (i) an individual tank with an above23 ground storage capacity greater than 

24 10,000 gallons; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3559 IS

1 (ii) an aggregate aboveground storage 

2 capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 

3 gallons; or 

4 (iii) a history that includes a spill, as 

5 determined by the Administrator; or 

6 (B) the owner or operator of the farm (via 

7 self-certification) for a farm with— 

8 (i) an aggregate aboveground storage 

9 capacity greater than 10,000 gallons but 

10 less than 42,000 gallons; and 

11 (ii) no history of spills, as determined 

12 by the Administrator; and 

13 (2) exempt from all requirements of the rule 

14 any farm— 

15 (A) with an aggregate aboveground storage 

16 capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 gallons; 

17 and 

18 (B) no history of spills, as determined by 

19 the Administrator. 

20 (c) CALCULATION OF AGGREGATE ABOVEGROUND

21 STORAGE CAPACITY.—For purposes of subsection (b), the 

22 aggregate aboveground storage capacity of a farm ex23 cludes all containers on separate parcels that have a ca24 pacity that is less than 1,320 gallons. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
14 January 2016

United States Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140

Washington, DC 20590

ATTN: Mr Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Federa l Aviation Administration

RE: Request for Information in regard to Modification for HAZON Solutions

Exemption No. 11442, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0218 u nder Section 333 of the

Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and Part 11 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir:

In reference to your letter dated 13 January 2016 requesting additional information regarding

the additional sUAS for HAZON Solutions Exemption No 11442 the following information is

provided.

Aircra ft Power Supply

Micro UAV Hazon Hex Battery

Formica X4 Battery

Sealed Bubble X8 Battery

Formica X8 Battery

FlyAbility Gimball Battery

UAV America Mule Quad / Eagle Battery

The UAV America Mule was the preproduction name of the UAV America Eagle. I t is now

sold by UAV America as the UAV America Eagle. It is technically identical to the UAV

America Mule/Eagle that was submitted in the modification request. HAZON Solutions

considers this a minor administrative name change.

Sincerely,

David A Culler Jr.

CEO, HAZON Solutions, LLC