alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.4 CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, James S. Kinnear, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Pengrowth Energy Trust (the Registrant);2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.

The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))) for the Registrant and have:  (a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days of this annual report (the Evaluation Date);
and(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.  5.

The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of Registrants board of directors (and persons performing the equivalent
function):  (a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely




---



##### 



affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting. Date:  March 29, 2005
    By:

/s/
James S. KinnearJames S. KinnearChairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of the registrant**

-

China Direct Investments, Inc., a Florida corporation, and a wholly owned subsidiary of China Direct,

-

CDI China, Inc., a Florida corporation, and a wholly owned subsidiary of China Direct,

-

CDI Shanghai Management Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI China,

-

Capital One Resource Co., Ltd., a Brunei company, and a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI Shanghai Management,

-

Shanghai Lang Chemical Co., Ltd. a Chinese limited liability company, and a 51% majority owned Taiyuan Changxin Magnesium Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a 51% majority owned subsidiary of CDI China,

-

Taiyuan Changxin YiWei Trading Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Chang Magnesium,

-

Excel Rise Technology Co., Ltd., a Brunei company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Chang Magnesium,

-

CDI Magnesium Co., Ltd., a Brunei company and a 51% majority owned subsidiary of CDI China,

-

Asia Magnesium Corporation Ltd., a Hong Kong limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Capital One Resource

-

Shanxi Gu County Golden Magnesium Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company formerly referred by us in filings and press releases as “Jinwei Magnesium” and a 52% majority owned subsidiary of Asia Magnesium,

-

Pan Asia Magnesium Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a 51% majority owned subsidiary of CDI China,

-

Baotou Changxin Magnesium Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a 51% majority owned subsidiary of CDI China,

-

CDI Clean Technology Group, Inc., a Florida corporation formerly known as Jinan Alternative Energy Group Corp., and a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI China,

-

Shandong CDI Wanda New Energy Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a 51% majority owned subsidiary of CDI Clean Technology,

-

Yantai CDI Wanda Renewable Resources Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a 52% majority owned subsidiary of CDI Wanda,

-

CDI Jingkun Zinc Industry Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a 95% majority owned subsidiary of CDI Shanghai Management,

-

CDI Jixiang Metal Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of CDI China 

-

Shanghai CDI Metal Recycling Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company and an 83% majority owned subsidiary of CDI Shanghai Management.
ex10_6.htm








Exhibit 10.6







At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 5, 2011, the Company’s shareholders approved the MGIC Investment Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”), including a structure and list of performance goals (the “listed goals”) for an annual bonus plan for the Company’s named executive officers (these officers are the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the next three highest paid executive officers) which conditions bonuses on satisfaction of one or more of the performance goals on that list (a bonus plan of this type is “a 162(m) Bonus Plan”). A copy of the 2011 Plan is included as Appendix B to our Proxy Statement filed on March 31, 2011.







The performance goal for our 162(m) Bonus Plan adopted by the Management Development, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) for 2012 requires the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio for MGIC’s primary new insurance written for that year to be less than 100%. The loss ratio is incurred losses in 2012 for the Company’s 2012 primary new insurance written, divided by premiums earned in 2012 on that business, and the expense ratio is the expenses of the Company’s insurance operations in 2012 divided by the Company’s net premiums written in 2012. If this goal is met, then the Committee will have discretion to make a subjective determination of bonuses, within the bonus maximums provided in the 2011 Plan, based on an assessment of shareholder value, return on investment, primary business drivers (loss ratio, expense ratio and market share), loss mitigation, management organization, capital position, effective dealings with federal and state regulatory agencies and the profitability of our mix of new business. With the exception of the targeted levels for the loss ratio, expense ratio and market share specified above, no specific targets were established for any of these bonus criteria for 2012.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10302]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LOUIS H. WALKER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4694

)

U.S. BANK NATIONAL )

ASSOCIATION as TRUSTEE )

FOR STRUCTURED ASSET )

SECURITES CORPORATION )

MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST )

2007-BNC1 MORTGAGE )

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, )

SERIES 2007-BNC1, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 1, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Lee County; 

Jay B. Rosman, Judge.

Louis H. Walker, pro se.

W. Bard Brockman of Bryan Cave LLP,

Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Frier v. Frier, 13 So. 

3d 145, 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

trial court's order did not make a determination as to personal jurisdiction).
- 2 -

Dismissed.

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Microbial infections in a declining wild turkey population in Texas      

      January 1, 1987    

A survey was conducted at 5 locations in Texas for avian pathogens that might adversely affect wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) productivity and survival. At 1 site, the Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Refuge (WWR), turkeys have declined precipitously in recent years. During the winters of 1983-85, 442 wild turkeys were caught with cannon and drop nets, 161 of these on WWR. Blood samples were drawn for serologic evaluation, and cloacal and tracheal swabs were collected for isolation attempts. Salmonella spp. bacteria, Newcastle disease virus (NDV), and avian influenza virus (AIV) were not detected in any samples tested. Serologic tests for antibodies to NDV and AIV also were negative. Many mycoplasma isolates were recovered from turkeys from every location. Characterization of these isolates indicated that several species were present. None were species typically associated with mycoplasmosis in domestic turkeys, such as Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), M. meleagridis (MM), or M. synoviae (MS), although antibodies to these pathogens were detected in turkeys at every location sampled. There was no evidence to link any of these disease causing agents to the decline observed in the population of wild turkeys on the WWR.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Tonie Rocke

##### Research Epidemiologist

National Wildlife Health Center

trocke@usgs.gov

608-270-2451

## Related Content

#### Tonie Rocke

##### Research Epidemiologist

National Wildlife Health Center

trocke@usgs.gov

608-270-2451

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - texas

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3667 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3667

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA.

    The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Special Rules for Certain 
Married Individuals'' and inserting ``Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal 
IRA''.

            Passed the Senate December 27, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3667

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.
```
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 2 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 3 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 4 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 5 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 6 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 7 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 8 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 9 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 10 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 11 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 12 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 13 of 14
Case 19-14871-EPK Doc 104 Filed 05/28/20 Page 14 of 14
Exhibit 10.9.2



 Exhibit 10.9.2 
 Amendment Agreement Number 1 
  

					
		 		 	 Barclays Bank PLC
 5 The North
Colonnade
 Canary Wharf, London E14 4BB

Facsimile: +44 (20) 777 36461
 Telephone:
+44 (20) 777 36810
  
 c/o Barclays Capital Inc.

as Agent for Barclays Bank PLC
 745 Seventh
Ave
 New York, NY 10019
 Telephone: +1
212 412 4000


 Capital One Financial Corporation 
 1680 Capital One Drive 
 McLean, VA 22102 
 Attention: Simon Fairclough 

			
	 Telephone No.:
	 	703-720-1253
	 Facsimile No.:
	 	703-720-2165

 November 1, 2011 
 Dear Mr. Fairclough: 
 Reference is made to the Share Forward Transaction letter agreement
dated July 14, 2011, as amended and supplemented from time to time, between Barclays Bank PLC, through its agent Barclays Capital Inc., and Capital One Financial Corporation (the “Agreement”). The purpose of this letter
agreement (this “Amendment Agreement”) is to amend certain terms set forth in the Agreement as described below. All capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement.
Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Barclays and Counterparty hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Settlement Date: The definition of Settlement Date shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


If (i) Cash Settlement or Net Share Settlement is applicable, Three Scheduled Trading Days immediately following the Valuation Date
or (ii) Physical Settlement is applicable, one Scheduled Trading Day immediately following the Settlement Notice Date. 
  

	 	2.	Counterparts: This Amendment Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original with the same effect as if the signatures
thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 

  

	 	3.	Governing Law: This Amendment Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 


Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 







 Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms and conditions of our agreement by
executing this Amendment Agreement Number 1. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.,
 acting solely as Agent in connection with this Transaction

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Adam Lawlor

		 	Name: Adam Lawlor
		 	Title:   Authorised Signatory
	
	Accepted and confirmed as of the Trade Date:
	
	CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen Linehan

		 	Name: Stephen Linehan
		 	Title: EVP, Treasurer
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4768 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature 

of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory 

and regulatory provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4768 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Separation of Powers 

3 Restoration Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATUTORY AND REGU5 LATORY INTERPRETATIONS. 

6 Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘To the extent necessary’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘(a) To the extent necessary’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘decide all relevant questions of 

11 law, interpret constitutional and statutory provi12 sions, and’’; 

13 (3) by inserting after ‘‘of the terms of an agen14 cy action’’ the following ‘‘and decide de novo all rel15 evant questions of law, including the interpretation 

16 of constitutional and statutory provisions, and rules 

17 made by agencies. Notwithstanding any other provi18 sion of law, this subsection shall apply in any action 

19 for judicial review of agency action authorized under 

20 any provision of law. No law may exempt any such 

21 civil action from the application of this section ex22 cept by specific reference to this section’’; and 

23 (4) by striking ‘‘The reviewing court shall—’’ 

24 and inserting the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4768 RFS

1 ‘‘(b) The reviewing court shall—’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Latonya Denise HALEY v. STATE

CR-15-1246

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marcus Leshawn HARRIS v. STATE

CR-15-1011

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied; memo of 02/03/2017 withdrawn; memo substituted; affirmed.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 7, 1995 / Notices 12539

[FR Doc. 95–5477 Filed 3–6–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–07–C
Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez

1103 Nueces, Austin, Texas 78701

Phone: 512-477-7991 Fax: 512-477-3580

E-Mail: ljir@aol.com

Attorney and

Counselor at Law

March 13, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk

Third Court of Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: In the Matter of J.M.

 Court of Appeals Cause No. 03-14-00027-CV

 Trial Court Cause No. J-31,485

Dear Mr. Kyle:

Please be advised that I will be appearing before the Court on April 22, 2015 at 9 a.m. to 

present oral argument in this case. If you have any questions, please contact me.

 

Sincerely,

Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez

cc: M. Scott Taliaferro, Asst. District Attorney

 Travis County District Attorneys Office

 P.O. Box 1748

 Austin, Texas 78767 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00027-CV

4493978

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/13/2015 2:16:06 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/13/2015 2:16:06 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery      

      January 1, 1994    

Vegetation phenological phenomena are closely related to seasonal dynamics of the lower atmosphere and are therefore important elements in global models and vegetation monitoring. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data derived from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) satellite sensor offer a means of efficiently and objectively evaluating phenological characteristics over large areas. Twelve metrics linked to key phenological events were computed based on time-series NDVI data collected from 1989 to 1992 over the conterminous United States. These measures include the onset of greenness, time of peak NDVI, maximum NDVI, rate of greenup, rate of senescence, and integrated NDVI. Measures of central tendency and variability of the measures were computed and analyzed for various land cover types. Results from the analysis showed strong coincidence between the satellite-derived metrics and predicted phenological characteristics. In particular, the metrics identified interannual variability of spring wheat in North Dakota, characterized the phenology of four types of grasslands, and established the phenological consistency of deciduous and coniferous forests. These results have implications for large-area land cover mapping and monitoring. The utility of remotely sensed data as input to vegetation mapping is demonstrated by showing the distinct phenology of several land cover types. More stable information contained in ancillary data should be incorporated into the mapping process, particularly in areas with high phenological variability. In a regional or global monitoring system, an increase in variability in a region may serve as a signal to perform more detailed land cover analysis with higher resolution imagery.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jesslyn Brown

##### Research Geographer

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

jfbrown@usgs.gov

605-594-6003

####             Thomas Loveland (Former Employee)          

##### Emeritus Scientist

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

## Related Content

#### Jesslyn Brown

##### Research Geographer

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

jfbrown@usgs.gov

605-594-6003

####             Thomas Loveland (Former Employee)          

##### Emeritus Scientist

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Dakota

View All **
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 18−16248−MAM Adversary Number: 19−01298−MAM

In re:

Name of Debtor(s): Chance & Anthem, LLC

−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

Robert C Furr

Plaintiff(s)

VS.

Jeffrey M Siskind and Siskind Legal Services and Tanya Siskind and Second Siskind

Family Trust and Frank R. Zokaites and CannaMed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and OB Real

Estate Holdings 1732, LLC and Sovereign Gaming and Entertainment, LLC and

Florida's Association of Community Banks and Credit Unions, Incorporated and

Sympatico Equine Rescue, Inc. and Wellington 3445, LP and Zokaites Properties, LP

and Robert Gibson

Defendant(s)

−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on 11/26/2019 at 10:00AM at the following location:

Flagler Waterview Building, 1515 N Flagler Dr Room 801 Courtroom A, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

to consider the following:

[97] Motion to Compel Filed by Defendant Jeffrey M Siskind (Siskind, Jeffrey)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and shall

file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party who fails

to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities. Electronic

devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras), iPads, tablets,

pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are not permitted in

the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for cameras not

integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar identification card,

attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses subpoenaed to appear in

a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited electronic device into a

federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge and verified by the United

States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 11/4/2019

By: Jeffrey M Siskind

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 98 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 1