alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Predation thresholds for reintroduction of native avifauna following suppression of invasive brown treesnakes on Guam      

      August 2, 2022    

The brown treesnake (BTS) (Boiga irregularis) invasion on Guåhan (in English, Guam) led to the extirpation of nearly all native forest birds. In recent years, methods have been developed to reduce BTS abundance on a landscape scale. To help assess the prospects for the successful reintroduction of native birds to Guåhan following BTS suppression, we modeled bird population persistence based on their life history characteristics and relative sensitivity to BTS predation. We constructed individual-based models and simulated BTS predation in hypothetical founding populations for each of seven candidate bird species. We represented BTS predation risk in two steps: risk of being encountered and risk of mortality if encountered. We link encounter risk from the bird's perspective to snake contact rates at camera traps with live animal lures, the most direct practical means of estimating BTS predation risk. Our simulations support the well-documented fact that Guåhan's birds cannot persist with an uncontrolled population of BTS but do indicate that bird persistence in Guåhan's forests is possible with suppression short of total eradication. We estimate threshold BTS contact rates would need to be below 0.0002–0.0006 snake contacts per bird per night for these birds to persist on the landscape, which translates to an annual encounter probability of 0.07–0.20. We simulated the effects of snake-proof nest boxes for Sihek (Todiramphus cinnamominus) and Såli (Aplonis opaca), but the benefits were small relative to the overall variation in contact rate thresholds among species. This variation among focal bird species in sustainable predation levels can be used to prioritize species for reintroduction in a BTS-suppressed landscape, but variation among these species is narrow relative to the required reduction from current BTS levels, which may be four orders of magnitude higher (>0.18). Our modeling indicates that the required predation thresholds may need to be lower than have yet been demonstrated with current BTS management. Our predation threshold metric provides an important management tool to help estimate target BTS suppression levels that can be used to determine when bird reintroduction campaigns might begin and serves as a model for other systems to match predator control with reintroduction efforts.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Eben H Paxton

##### Research Ecologist

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center

epaxton@usgs.gov

808-985-6423

## Related Content

#### Eben H Paxton

##### Research Ecologist

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center

epaxton@usgs.gov

808-985-6423

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center          

Crater Rim Drive, Hawai‘i Volcanoes National ParkPO Box 44Hawai‘i National Park, HI96718United States

(808) 985-6420

### Explore Search

                  - Guam

View All **
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Richard Rosenblatt, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas Flahie, Chief Financial Officer, of eUniverse, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2004, (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: June 14, 2004



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD M.
ROSENBLATT 
|Richard M. Rosenblatt        
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principle Executive Officer)



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    THOMAS J.
FLAHIE      
|Thomas J. Flahie             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Morgan Stanley Schedule of Non-Employee Directors Annual Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.59 
 MORGAN STANLEY SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS ANNUAL
COMPENSATION 
 Effective as of May 17, 2011 

 

					
	RETAINER(1)	  	AMOUNT	 
	 Service as a Director
	  	$	75,000	  
		
	 Service as Chair of Audit Committee
	  	$	25,000	  
		
	 Service as Chair of Compensation, Management Development and

Succession Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee; or

Risk Committee
	  	$  
  

 
	20,000  

 
  
	    
  

 

		
	 Service as Chair of Operations and Technology Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
		
	 Service as Member of Audit Committee, Compensation, Management

Development and Succession Committee; Nominating and Governance

Committee; Operations and Technology Committee; or Risk Committee
	  	$  
  

 
	10,000  

 
  
	    
  

 

		
	 Service as Lead Director
	  	$	30,000	  

  

	(1) 	 The retainer shall be paid semi-annually in arrears for the period from the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders until the next
succeeding Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 50% of a non-employee director’s retainer shall be made on (or promptly after) the business day coincident with or first following the six month anniversary of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting
of Shareholders. The remaining portion of a non-employee director’s retainer shall be made on (or promptly after) the next succeeding Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 



In the event a non-employee director joins the Board at a time other than an Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or commences service on an
additional Board committee, such director shall be entitled to receive a prorated retainer for service on the Board or such Board committee, as applicable, until the next succeeding Annual Meeting of Shareholders semi-annually in arrears. Such
retainer shall be prorated for service during the period beginning on the first day of the calendar month during which the non-employee director joins the Board, or commences service on such Board committee, until the last day of the calendar month
immediately preceding the calendar month during which the retainer is payable in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph. 
 In the event a non-employee director terminates from service on the Board at a time other than an Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such director shall be entitled to receive a prorated retainer for service
on the Board, and any Board committee. Such retainer shall be prorated for service during the period beginning on the first day of the calendar month during which the last retainer payment date occurs until the last day of the calendar month
immediately preceding the calendar month during which the director’s Board service termination date occurs and shall be made on (or promptly after) the director’s Board service termination date. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a non-employee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the retainer on a deferred basis under the
Directors’ Equity Capital Accumulation Plan.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-24331-BKC-JKO 

 CHAPTER 13 

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. 

__________________________/ 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

HEREBY CERTIFY that true copies of the following documents were served upon all 

interested parties listed on the attached Service List, in the manner noted therein, on March 5, 

2020: 

 

Order Sustaining Objection to Proof of Claim filed by Westside Medical Center 

(Claim no.: 1-1) (DE 51). 

Dated: March 5, 2020 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL H. JOHNSON 

Attorneys for Debtor(s) 

3601 W. Commercial Blvd, Ste 31 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 

(954) 535-1131 

By:_/s/ Michael H. Johnson_____ 

 Michael H. Johnson 

 Florida Bar No. 0149543 

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN 

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA AND I AM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE

ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATIONS TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT

SET FORTH IN LOCAL RULE 2090-1(A). 

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 54 Filed 03/06/20 Page 1 of 2
SERVICE LIST:

VIA CM/ECF:

Office of the US Trustee 

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

Robin R Weiner 

ecf@ch13weiner.com;ecf2@ch13weiner.com

VIA U.S. MAIL:

Westside Regional Medical Center 

c/o Resurgent Capital Services 

POB 1927 

Greenville, SC 29602 

ATTN: Stacie Rhoades, Claims Processor 

Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 54 Filed 03/06/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling areal measures of campsite impacts on the Appalachian National Scenic Trail to enhance ecological sustainability      

      December 15, 2020    

Campsite impacts in protected natural areas are most effectively minimized by a containment strategy that focuses use on a limited number of sustainable campsites that spatially concentrate camping activities. This research employs spatial autoregressive (SAR) modeling to evaluate the relative influence of use-related, environmental, and managerial factors on two salient measures of campsite impact. Relational analyses examined numerous field-collected and GIS-derived indicators, including several new indicators calculated using high-resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) topographic data to evaluate the influence of terrain characteristics on the dependent variables.

Chosen variables in the best SAR models explained 35% and 30% of the variation in campsite size and area of vegetation loss on campsites. Results identified three key indicators that managers can manipulate to enhance the sustainability of campsites: campsite type, and terrain characteristics relating to landform slope and topographic roughness. Results support indirect management methods that rely on the location, design, construction, and maintenance of campsites, instead of direct regulations that restrict visitation or visitor freedoms. As visitation pressures continue to increase, this knowledge can be applied to select and promote the use of more ecologically sustainable campsites.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeff Marion, Ph.D.

##### Research Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jeff_marion@usgs.gov

540-231-6603

## Related Content

#### Jeff Marion, Ph.D.

##### Research Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

jeff_marion@usgs.gov

540-231-6603

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Appalachian National Scenic Trail
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Maine
                  -  Maryland
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  North Carolina
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  South Carolina
                  -  Vermont
                  -  Virginia

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: Case No.: 19-24331-PDR

Chapter 13

Ralph Levi Sanders, Jr.,

Debtor.

_______________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART

DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY PARTICIPATION (DOC NO. 183)

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Order Sustaining In Part Debtor’s 

Objection To Attorney Participation (Doc. No 183), dated August 9, 2021, was served on all 

CM/ECF registered parties via Notice of Electronic Filing, and by regular first-class U.S. Mail 

on all other interested parties as listed below on this 12

th day of August, 2021.

/s/ Peter W. Kelly

Peter W. Kelly, Esquire

Florida Bar No. 59991

P.W. Kelly Associates, P.A.

P.O. Box 331083

Miami, FL 33233

P: (786) 766-0012

E: pkelly@pwkpa.com

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE

Robin R. Weiner – ecf@ch13weiner.com

United States Trustee – ustpregion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

All other CM/ECF Registered Parties

VIA FIRST-CLASS U.S. MAIL

Ralph Levi Sanders, Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 186 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 1
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2093

___________ Jason R. French, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Jack M. Lewis, Municipal Judge, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 5, 1998 Filed: October 9, 1998

___________ Befo re McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPAR D ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jason R. French filed a complaint alleging that Van Buren County Municipa l Judge Jack M. Lewis failed to offer him equal protection, refused to recuse himself , maliciously arrested and prosecuted him, and retaliated against him. Although Mr
. French did not clearly explain the surrounding circumstances, he indicated that he was in carcerated for fifty days for failure to pay a fine and that he suffered mistreatmen t while in jail. He requested damages and “permanent injunctive relief.” The districtThe Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- court granted Judge Lewis & s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 12(b)(6), and Mr. French appeals.
We review d e novo a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, see Breedlove v
. Earthgrains Baking Cos. , 140 F.3d 79 7, 799 (8th Cir. 1998), petition for cert. filed , 67 U.S.L.W. 3083 (U.S. July 6, 1998) (No. 98-77), accepting th e factual allegations in the complaint as true and construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, see Spri ngdale Educ. Ass & n v. Springdale Sch. Dist. , 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998)
. Under this standard, we conclude that dismissal was proper.
It appears that Mr. French & s complaint arose from criminal proceedings ove r which Judge Lewis presided. Acts such as assessing a fine, imposing punishment for failure to pay a fine, and issuing an arrest warrant are “judicial acts” within th e jurisdiction of an Arkansas municipal judge. SeeArk. Code A nn. § 16-17-704 (Michie 1994) (municipal courts have original jurisdiction over violations of city ordinances and mi sdemeanors); Duty v. City of Springdale , 42 F.3d 460, 462 (8th Cir. 1994) (pe r curi am) (“Arkansas law vests municipal judges with the power to issue arres t warrants”). Thus, for engaging in such acts, Judge Lewis was absolutely immune from ci villiability for damages. See Liles v. Reagan , 804 F.2d 493, 495 (8th Cir. 1986)
. While judicial immunity does not bar prospective injunctive relief, see Pulliam v. Allen , 4 6 6 U.S. 522, 541-42 (1984), there was no indication in this case that Judge Lewis & s allegedly illegal conduct is likely to recur or that no adequate remedy at law exists, see Sterli ng v. Calvin , 874 F.2d 571, 572 (8th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (prerequisites t o obtaining injunctive relief). Accordingly, we affirm.-3-

A true copy. Attest: CLE RK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-120215]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35299; File No. SR-PTC-94-07]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Participants Trust Company; Order 
Approving on an Accelerated Basis a Proposed Rule Change Establishing a 
Daily Penalty Fee Applicable to Late Funding of Shortfalls in 
Participants' Mandatory Deposits to the Participants Fund

January 31, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-2904 beginning on page 7250 in the issue of 
Tuesday, February 7, 1995, the file number is corrected as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CGFD44 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 27, 2023

Robert A Mark

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−21168−RAM

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

William David Sullivan II

dba Vetro Spec, fdba Canvas Mart USA, fdba Reliatex Marine

8240 NW 15 Ave

Miami, FL 33147

SSN: xxx−xx−6258 EIN: 20−0650795

ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO TRUSTEE'S REPORT OF

NON−COMPLIANCE BY DEBTOR WITH POST CONFIRMATION PLAN

 As provided under Local Rule 3070−1(C)(2)(c), a Report of Non−Compliance by Debtor with Plan

Payments has been filed by the trustee in this case indicating that the debtor was served by the trustee

with a notice of delinquency which established a deadline for the debtor to become current with plan

payments and that the debtor has failed to meet this deadline.

 Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

Page 1 of 2

Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 119 Filed 02/27/23 Page 1 of 2
1. This case is dismissed.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

3. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United

States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the

balance of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the

trustee shall be applied to this balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in

accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by

the court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all

unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

5. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with

the requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

6. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B)(1), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept

for filing any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior

order of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in

Installments and filing fees remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 19-21168-RAM Doc 119 Filed 02/27/23 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Observed changes in phenology across the USA: A regional review for the 2013 National Climate Assessment, Northeast Regional Information Sheet      

      March 1, 2013    

This is one in a series of eight, geographic region-focused information sheets that summarizes documented changes in plant and animal phenology over the past century across the United States. This summary is based on long-term studies (10 years or more) published in the primary scientific literature since 2001. A forthcoming manuscript synthesizes the findings of the eight regional information sheets.

This information was developed in support of the U.S. Global Change Research Program’s National Climate Assessment and can be used to facilitate preparation for the cascading effects of ongoing climate change.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - District of Columbia
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Delaware
                  -  Maine
                  -  Maryland
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  New York
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  Rhode Island
                  -  Vermont
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
Mary QUILLIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AMERILIFE OF THE SUNCOAST, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103239, 333-63010, 333-50528,333-35416, 333-93037 and 333-108918) of Agile Software Corporation of our report dated July 9, 2004, except for paragraphs appearing under “Reclassifications” in Note 1, as to which the date is June 16, 2005, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

San Jose, California 

June 16, 2005
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  August  31,  2003,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Louis
Pardo dit Pardau,  Chief  Financial  Officer (or the equivalent  thereof) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my knowledge and
belief:


     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date: June 10, 2004

/s/ Louis Pardau dit Pardo
Louis Pardau dit Pardo
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent)