alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Optimal control of native predators      

      January 1, 2010    

We apply decision theory in a structured decision-making framework to evaluate how control of raccoons (Procyon lotor), a native predator, can promote the conservation of a declining population of American Oystercatchers (Haematopus palliatus) on the Outer Banks of North Carolina. Our management objective was to maintain Oystercatcher productivity above a level deemed necessary for population recovery while minimizing raccoon removal. We evaluated several scenarios including no raccoon removal, and applied an adaptive optimization algorithm to account for parameter uncertainty. We show how adaptive optimization can be used to account for uncertainties about how raccoon control may affect Oystercatcher productivity. Adaptive management can reduce this type of uncertainty and is particularly well suited for addressing controversial management issues such as native predator control. The case study also offers several insights that may be relevant to the optimal control of other native predators. First, we found that stage-specific removal policies (e.g., yearling versus adult raccoon removals) were most efficient if the reproductive values among stage classes were very different. Second, we found that the optimal control of raccoons would result in higher Oystercatcher productivity than the minimum levels recommended for this species. Third, we found that removing more raccoons initially minimized the total number of removals necessary to meet long term management objectives. Finally, if for logistical reasons managers cannot sustain a removal program by removing a minimum number of raccoons annually, managers may run the risk of creating an ecological trap for Oystercatchers.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Julien Martin, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

julienmartin@usgs.gov

240-354-2934

####             Allan O'Connell, Jr., Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Manager

Eastern Ecological Science Center

#### Michael Runge, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

mrunge@usgs.gov

301-497-5748

## Related Content

#### Julien Martin, Ph.D.

##### Supervisory Biologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

julienmartin@usgs.gov

240-354-2934

####             Allan O'Connell, Jr., Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Manager

Eastern Ecological Science Center

#### Michael Runge, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

mrunge@usgs.gov

301-497-5748

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - Biology
                  - United States
                  - Outer Banks
                  - North Carolina

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Introduction to the special section on seismoacoustics and seismoacoustic data fusion      

      July 7, 2023    

A variety of geophysical hazards (e.g., volcanic activity, earthquakes, mass movements, marine storms, bolides) and anthropogenic sources (e.g., chemical and nuclear explosions, mining blasts, rocket launches) can release energy as mechanical waves in the ground, ocean, and atmosphere (Arrowsmith et al., 2010; Campus and Christie, 2009). Due to the mechanical coupling between a planetary body, its ocean, and its atmosphere, waves can propagate across these interfaces (Ben-Menahem and Singh, 1981) and carry information about the source and the media they propagated through. The field of seismoacoustics, driven by geophysical observations of both seismic and low-frequency acoustic (infrasound) waves, has several interdisciplinary applications. Observations of both seismic and infrasonic waves can be used to discriminate between atmospheric and subsurface events, such as sonic booms and earthquakes. Moreover, seismoacoustic analyses can provide useful information for the source characterization of shallow anthropogenic events, such as underground or surface explosions, volcanic, and tectonic events (e.g., Arrowsmith et al., 2020; Assink et al., 2016; de Groot-Hedlin and Hedlin, 2019; Matoza et al., 2009). Similarly, remote observations (e.g., on regional seismic and infrasonic arrays) can help monitor natural events such as volcanic eruptions and provide additional details about eruption dynamics. Recent works additionally suggest that infrasound can be used to discriminate between different volcanic processes (Watson et al., 2022). Finally, looking outwards, the study of seismo-acoustics has been a particularly valuable tool for planetary science (e.g., Krishnamoorthy et al., 2018; Martire et al., 2018; Krishnamoorthy et al., 2019; Martire et al., 2020; Garcia et al., 2020; Brissaud et al., 2021).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Alexandra Iezzi, Ph.D.

##### Volcano Geophysicist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

aiezzi@usgs.gov

(360) 993-8948

## Related Content

#### Alexandra Iezzi, Ph.D.

##### Volcano Geophysicist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

aiezzi@usgs.gov

(360) 993-8948

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Pages 13212-13213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-130310]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency for International Development

48 CFR Appendix G to Chapter 7

[AIDAR Notice 95-1]

Miscellaneous Amendments to Acquisition Regulations

Correction

    In rule document 95-4111 beginning on page 11911 in the issue of 
Friday, March 3, 1995, make the following corrections:

Appenix G to Chapter 7 [Corrected]

    On page 11913, in the first column, in Appendix G to Chapter 7, in 
2.(a), the last two lines should read ``negotiate and execute contracts 
(see AIDAR Appendix A).''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D [[Page 13213]]
```
P&L Summary - Consolidated

Chance & Anthem, LLC (Case No.: 18-16248-MAM)

Consolidated Summary of Expenses

Summary - Years 2014 to 2017

Description

December 31, 

2014

December 31, 

2015

December 31, 

2016

December 31, 

2017 Total 

Income

Income Received - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 

Expenses

Auto Insurance - - 508.69 570.77 1,079.46 

Bank Fees 1,278.50 918.00 3,114.88 2,900.50 8,211.88 

Cash & Withdrawals 1

 29,123.47 (16,405.92) (55,170.00) (27,808.33) (70,260.78) 

Client Expenses 1,234.75 40,640.29 (3,500.00) 1,793.76 40,168.80 

Closing Costs - - 73,054.26 73,054.26 

Credit Card 400.00 - - - 400.00 

Commisions 377.98 18,030.50 23,550.00 - 41,958.48 

Donations 2,997.83 6,423.59 3,288.86 - 12,710.28 

Employee Related 4,116.97 6,439.57 61,673.29 100.00 72,329.83 

Gas & auto 6,294.38 16,710.97 5,748.53 2,297.90 31,051.78 

Insurance 2,508.24 10.62 - - 2,518.86 

Investment in CannaMED - - - - - 

Maintenance 14,201.72 27,461.59 29,690.48 4,830.66 76,184.45 

Meals 9,925.27 7,066.55 7,224.22 4,126.77 28,342.81 

Miscellaneous 45,811.42 21,303.48 19,518.27 34,074.12 120,707.29 

Office Rent/Mortgage 104,244.41 99,357.07 180,403.63 23,790.54 407,795.65 

Property Expense 16,370.63 10,294.85 95,651.35 17,878.52 140,195.35 

Taxes (9,320.43) 363.50 - - (8,956.93) 

Travel and Entertainment 13,732.54 25,179.42 16,052.86 4,872.97 59,837.79 

Utilities 1,391.85 3,512.73 6,115.21 977.21 11,997.00 

Total Expenses 199,160.14 312,836.20 466,924.53 70,405.39 1,049,326.26 

Net Income/(Loss) $ (199,160.14) $ (312,836.20) $ (466,924.53) $ (70,405.39) $ (1,049,326.26)

FOOTNOTES:

1

 Related entity Siskind IOTA reflected an additional approximate $238K of net checks to cash and withdrawals that are not included in this consolidation.

GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC Page 1 of 1

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 477-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 136 (Monday, July 17, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 36462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30717]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-AGL-6]


Proposed Modification of Class E Airspace; Mount Vernon, IL

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-14173 beginning on page 30478 in the 
issue of Friday, June 9, 1995, make the following corrections:
    On page 30478, in the second column, in the 12th line from the 
bottom, ``Comments'' should read ``Commenters''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 2627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40110]



      
                                                     VOL. 60, NO. 6

                                          Tuesday, January 10, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 6/Tuesday, January 10, 1995/
Corrections


[[Page 2627]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. TM95-1-55-001 and RP94-331-004]


Questar Pipeline Co.; Notice of Compliance Tariff Filing

Correction

    In notice document 94-31277 appearing on page 65766, in the issue 
of Wednesday, December 21, 1994, in the third column, in the first 
line, the docket number should read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20418]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and




(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      November 13, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Liu BoLiu
      BoChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive
officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

LaBranche & Co Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-76928 and 333-73212) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements (No. 333-44464, 333-57090 and 333-102607) on Form S-8 of LaBranche & Co Inc. of our report datedMarch 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of LaBranche & Co Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome, and cash flows, for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of LaBranche & Co Inc.

Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C. 

Roseland, New Jersey 

March 16, 2009
Ernesto PEREZ-HERRERA and Ana Maria Perez, Appellants, v. Simon MOLINA and Rufina Espinoza DeMolina, Appellees.

Case No. 2D15-4835

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Averox Inc. ("Averox") on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Mirza Yasser Ahmad, Chief Financial Officer of
Averox, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 12, 2008


                                                          /s/ Mirza Yasser Ahmad
                                                         -----------------------
                                                              Mirza Yasser Ahmad
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17I0005. DAVID PATTON v. JOYCELYN VANTERPOOL.

Joycelyn Vanterpool filed a paternity action against her ex-husband, David

Patton. She later moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that under OCGA §

19-7-21,

1 Patton is the legal father of her child, who was conceived through in vitro

fertilization using donor egg and sperm. Patton opposed the motion, arguing among

other things that OCGA § 19-7-21 is unconstitutional. The trial court ruled that

Patton’s constitutional challenge had “no basis” and granted Vanterpool’s motion. 

Patton now seeks interlocutory review in this Court, renewing his constitutional

argument.

The Supreme Court “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving

construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and

all casesin which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision

has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga.

657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996); Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Para. II. The trial

court’s rejection of Patton’s constitutional challenge appears to be “effectively a

distinct ruling on the constitutional issues.” Zarate-Martinez v. Echemendia, __ Ga.

__ (1) (Case No. S15G1446, decided July 5, 2016) (punctuation omitted). Thus, this

case appearsto fall within the Supreme Court’s exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction. 

1 That statute provides, “All children born within wedlock or within the usual

period of gestation thereafter who have been conceived by means of artificial

insemination are irrebuttably presumed legitimate if both spouses have consented in

writing to the use and administration of artificial insemination.”

August 24, 2016
We further note that the Supreme Court has “ultimate responsibility for construing

the constitutional provisions regarding appellate jurisdiction.” Saxon v. Coastal

Dialysis & Medical Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996). Accordingly,

this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/24/2016
Case 19-25851-CLC    Doc 39    Filed 02/19/20    Page 1 of 4

Case 19-25851-CLC    Doc 39    Filed 02/19/20    Page 2 of 4

Case 19-25851-CLC    Doc 39    Filed 02/19/20    Page 3 of 4

Case 19-25851-CLC    Doc 39    Filed 02/19/20    Page 4 of 4
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3036 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on certain men’s 

footwear, not covering the ankle, designed to be worn in lieu of, but 

not over, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease, or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

certain men’s footwear, not covering the ankle, designed 

to be worn in lieu of, but not over, other footwear as 

a protection against water, oil, grease, or chemicals or 

cold or inclement weather. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3036 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR, NOT COVERING 

2 THE ANKLE, DESIGNED TO BE WORN IN LIEU 

3 OF, BUT NOT OVER, OTHER FOOTWEAR AS A 

4 PROTECTION AGAINST WATER, OIL, GREASE, 

5 OR CHEMICALS OR COLD OR INCLEMENT 

6 WEATHER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.61 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 certain men’s footwear, not covering the ankle, designed 

10 to be worn in lieu of, but not over, other footwear as a 

11 protection against water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold 

12 or inclement weather) is amended— 

13 (1) in the article description, by striking ‘‘$20/ 

14 pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$23/pair’’; and 

15 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

16 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

19 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23 - INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-94141 of Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated February 28, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2001
and 2002.

Ernst & Young LLP
San Juan, Puerto Rico

March 20, 2003



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-94141 of Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated March 9, 2001 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Juan, Puerto Rico

March 25, 2003
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2339

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Emery Joseph Beaulieu, also known * [UNPUBLISHED]

as Joe Beaulieu, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 18, 2001

Filed: June 22, 2001

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LAY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a bench trial, the district court convicted Emery Joseph Beaulieu of two

counts of aggravated sexual abuse of a child and sentenced Beaulieu to 108 months

imprisonment and five years supervised release. On appeal, Beaulieu's counsel has

filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Beaulieu has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Because we conclude Beaulieu

knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence, see

United States v. Michelsen, 141 F.3d 867, 871-72 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 942
-2-

(1998), we enforce the waiver and dismiss this appeal, see United States v. EstradaBahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). Counsel's motion to

withdraw is granted.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re:

CASE NO. 19-22021

Anibal Balbona 

Maggie Balbona

Debtor

______________________________/

AGREED ORDER GRANTING IN PART 

TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF # 51)

THIS MATTER came on for consideration on the Chapter 13 Trustee’s Motion to

Dismiss for Other Reasons (the “Motion”). The Court being advised the parties having come to

the following agreement, 

ORDERS as follows:

1. The Motion is Granted in Part.

2. The Debtor(s) shall have seven (7) days from the entry of this order to file Local Form

76 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 16, 2020.

Case 19-22021-RAM Doc 53 Filed 10/16/20 Page 1 of 2
3. If the Debtor(s) fail to comply with this order, the Chapter 13 Trustee is permitted to

submit an order dismissing the case. 

###

Submitted by: Nancy K. Neidich

Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

P.O. Box 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027

(954) 443-4402

Case 19-22021-RAM Doc 53 Filed 10/16/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9691]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment Program.
    Date: April 30, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Joann McConnell, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NINDS/Neuroscience 
Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, Msc 9529, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9529, (301) 496-5324, [email protected].
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 21, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-9691 Filed 4-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```