alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Postfire debris flow hazards—Tips to keep you safe              

      October 17, 2022    

View Report

Often referred to as “mudflows,” debris flows are a type of landslide made up of a rapidly moving mixture of dirt, rocks, trees, and water (and sometimes ash) that start on a hillside and travel downvalley. They can easily overflow channels and severely damage houses, vehicles, or other structures. Areas burned by wildfires are especially susceptible to these hazards, which can be triggered by storms occurring days to years after a fire. Debris flows in burned areas can start on a dry slope after only a few minutes of heavy rainfall—about half an inch an hour or more. They can also threaten unsuspecting areas downstream, as debris flows can travel many miles and affect places that were neither burned nor received any rain. The tips provided in this Fact Sheet can help to keep you safe in a potential debris flow danger area.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Steven Sobieszćzyk

##### Media Lead - Natural Hazards

Communications and Publishing

##### Hydrologist/PIO2

Wildland Fire Science

ssobie@usgs.gov

503-853-3425

#### Jason Kean

##### Research Hydrologist

Landslide Hazards Program

jwkean@usgs.gov

303-273-8608

## Related Content

                  - Connect  Steven SobieszćzykMedia Lead - Natural HazardsCommunications and PublishingHydrologist/PIO2Wildland Fire ScienceEmailssobie@usgs.govPhone503-853-3425Jason KeanResearch HydrologistLandslide Hazards ProgramEmailjwkean@usgs.govPhone303-273-8608 

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

####               New Mexico Water Science Center          

6700 Edith Blvd NEAlbuquerque, NM87113United States

debclark@usgs.gov

(505) 830-7900

(505) 830-7998 

### Explore Search

                  - Landslide Hazards
                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
#### William C. Anderson, Respondent, *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 15, 1973.

*Friend, Post $ Hopkins (John G. Paré*and *Edward T. Post*of counsel), for appellant. *Francis E. Dorn*and *Joseph Hausman*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff having foregone the opportunity to apply for life insurance on his wife without medical examination in a lesser sum and thereby changed his position to his detriment (if defendant’s rejection of the application be permitted to succeed) solely on the representations and actions of defendant’s agent, which defendant in nowise disaffirms or reprehends, it is our view that defendant is now estopped to deny the validity of the signature on the application. *(Wells*v. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*19 App. Div. 18, 25-26, affd. 163 N. Y. 572; *Pickett*v. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*20 App. Div. 114; *McElwain*v. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*33 App. Div. 60), or the sufficiency of the information furnished and the effectiveness of the receipt for one month’s premium in providing temporary interim insurance in the amount of the policy applied for *(Lampke*v. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*279 N. Y. 157, 164-165); 16A Appelman Insurance Law and Practice, § 9102).

*1004The judgment and order should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Fine, J. P., Lupiano and Quinn, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, etc.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Philip Nolan, as Chief Executive Officer of eircomGroup plc (registrant), and eircomFunding, Valentia Telecommunications and eircomLimited (additional registrants) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended 31 March 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant and the additional registrants.



|      |  |                     
|----- |  | --------------------
|Date: |  | 26thJune, 2006      
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Dr. Philip Nolan
|      |  | Dr. Philip Nolan    
|      |  | Chief Executive     
|      |  | eircomGroup plc     

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
eircomGroup plc and will be retained by eircomGroup plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
  
 **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
 Collectors Universe, Inc.
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-34554, No. 333-34556, No. 333-34558 and No. 333-85962 of Collectors Universe, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated September 23, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to a change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective July 1, 2002, and a restatement to report the assets and related liabilities of the collectibles auctions and direct sales businesses as held for sale and the related operating results as discontinued operations), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Collectors Universe, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2004.
 
 
 
 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
 Costa Mesa, California
 September 24, 2004
EXHIBIT “A”

Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 84-1 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

BROWARD DIVISION

In re:

SEVEN STARS ON THE HUDSON 

CORPORATION d/b/a ROCKIN’ JUMP,

Debtor,

____________________________________/

SEVERN STARS ON THE HUDSON 

CORPORATION d/b/a ROCKIN’ JUMP

Plaintiff,

vs.

MDG POWERLINE HOLDINGS, LLC AND 

XBK MANAGEMENT LLC d/b/a XTREME 

ACTION PARK,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

CASE NO. 19-17544-RBR

Chapter 11

Adversary Proceeding

No. 19-AP-1230-SMG

AFFIDAVIT OF DILIGENCE OF LISA N. BALKIN, ESQ. IN OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared, Lisa N. Balkin, who, upon 

being duly sworn, deposes and states, as follows:

1. My name is Lisa N. Balkin. I am over the age of eighteen and otherwise sui juris.

2. I make this affidavit based upon personal knowledge of the facts set forth below 

and the records of South Florida Business Law Group as they are maintained in the ordinary course 

of their business.

Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 84-1 Filed 10/26/20 Page 2 of 4
2

3. I submit this affidavit in opposition to the motion of Plaintiff Seven Stars On The 

Hudson Corporation, d/b/a Rockin’ Jump To Compel And For Sanctions Against Defendant XBK 

Management LLC, d/b/a Xtreme Action Park (“XBK”) (the “Motion”).

4. At all times material, I was associated with South Florida Business Law Group as 

an attorney assigned to the task of producing documents responsive to Plaintiff’s First Request For 

Production (the “Request”).

5. Since gaining access to the electronic information compiled by XBK in response to 

the Request on October 6, 2020, I have expended 19.9 hours reviewing 570 e-mail threads 

containing multiple communications and attachments within each thread.

6. Said review was undertaken to determine said thread’s responsiveness to Plaintiff’s 

Request and to identify any documents to be isolated from production and included in a log of 

documents withheld from production on the grounds of privilege.

7. In addition, because of difficulties encountered in reviewing and redacting the 

electronic format of the data produced by XBK, I am aware that the law firm’s assistant expended 

19.4 hours between October 6, 2020 and October 22, 2020 converting all of the electronic records 

into PDF format, confirming consistency as to number and content between the electronic and 

PDF formats, and moving said files into an online storage folder so that production could be made 

to Plaintiff.

Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 84-1 Filed 10/26/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 84-1 Filed 10/26/20 Page 4 of 4
Mary Virginia GRAHAM, Petitioner, v. BARMARRAE BOOKS, INC., and Constance Rae Uphold, Respondents.

No. 1D17-573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,286,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,287,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                   235,183
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,739,860
<PP&E>                                       5,125,463
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,322,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,573,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,313,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,952
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,006,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,573,055
<SALES>                                      6,936,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,936,046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,405,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,685,832)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (19,154,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (3,796,736)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (22,951,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.21)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Interaction of meteoric waters with magmas of the Boulder Batholith, Montana      

      July 14, 1977    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Boulder Batholith
                  - Montana

View All **
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the TiVo Inc. (the Company) Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 15, 2008



/s/ THOMAS ROGERSThomas RogersChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landslides and related features, Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania [Clarksburg quadrangle]      

      January 1, 1978    

View Plate A-1

View Plate A-2

View Plate A-3

View Plate A-4

View Plate A-5

View Plate A-6

View Plate A-7

View Plate A-8

View Plate A-9

View Plate A-10

View Plate A-11

View Plate A-12

View Plate A-13

View Plate A-14

View Plate A-15

View Plate A-16

View Plate B-1

View Plate B-2

View Plate B-3

View Plate B-4

View Plate B-5

View Plate B-6

View Plate B-7

View Plate B-8

View Plate B-9

View Plate B-10

View Plate B-11

View Plate B-12

View Plate B-13

View Plate B-14

View Plate B-15

View Plate B-16

View Plate C-1

View Plate C-2

View Plate C-3

View Plate C-4

View Plate C-5

View Plate C-6

View Plate C-7

View Plate C-8

View Plate C-9

View Plate C-10

View Plate C-11

View Plate C-12

View Plate C-13

View Plate C-14

View Plate C-15

View Plate C-16

View Plate D-1

View Plate D-2

View Plate D-3

View Plate D-4

View Plate D-5

View Plate D-6

View Plate D-7

View Plate D-8

View Plate D-9

View Plate D-10

View Plate D-11

View Plate D-12

View Plate D-13

View Plate D-14

View Plate D-15

View Plate D-16

View Plate E-1

View Plate E-2

View Plate E-3

View Plate E-4

View Plate E-5

View Plate E-6

View Plate E-7

View Plate E-8

View Plate E-9

View Plate E-10

View Plate E-11

View Plate E-12

View Plate E-13

View Plate E-14

View Plate E-15

View Plate E-16

View Plate F-1

View Plate F-2

View Plate F-3

View Plate F-4

View Plate F-5

View Plate F-6

View Plate F-7

View Plate F-8

View Plate F-9

View Plate F-10

View Plate F-11

View Plate F-12

View Plate F-13

View Plate F-14

View Plate F-15

View Plate F-16

View Plate G-1

View Plate G-2

View Plate G-3

View Plate G-4

View Plate G-5

View Plate G-6

View Plate G-7

View Plate G-8

View Plate G-9

View Plate G-10

View Plate G-11

View Plate G-12

View Plate G-13

View Plate G-14

View Plate G-16

View Plate H-1

View Plate H-2

View Plate H-3

View Plate H-4

View Plate H-5

View Plate H-6

View Plate H-7

View Plate H-8

View Plate H-9

View Plate H-10

View Plate H-11

View Plate H-12

View Plate H-13

View Plate H-14

View Plate H-15

View Plate H-16

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Ohio
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. CASE NO. 19-24331-PDR

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL

MODIFICATION OF PLAN FILED BY SPECIALIZED

LOAN SERVICING, LLC (DE #101) AND CONTINUING HEARING

ON DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO DMM PORTAL (DE# 106)

THIS CASE came on for hearing on May 3, 2021 at 1:00PM on the Motion to Compel 

Modification of Plan filed by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC as servicing agent for The Bank 

of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, 

N.A. as Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-SD2, Asset-Backed 

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 6, 2021.

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 120 Filed 05/06/21 Page 1 of 3
Certificates, Series 2006-SD2 (“Lender”) (D.E.# 101), and the Motion for Access to DMM Portal 

filed by the Debtor (D.E.# 106). For the reasons stated on the record, it is

ORDERED:

1. The Motion to Compel Modification of Plan (D.E.# 101) is granted.

2. The Debtor shall have until June 1, 2021 to retain bankruptcy counsel. 

3. On or before June 1, 2021, the Debtor shall file a proposed Modified Plan and 

Motion to Modify Plan to either conform to Movant’s Proof of Claim, without limitation on any 

right to object to the claim or proceed with a motion to value; or provide that the subject real 

property will be treated outside the plan.

4. All other relief sought by the Debtor in the Motion For Access to DMM Portal 

(D.E.# 106) and Debtor’s Objection to Motion to Compel Modification of Plan (D.E.# 114) is 

continued for further non-evidentiary hearing on June 1, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. by telephone through 

Court Solutions, the Court’s telephonic service provider. Appearances through Court Solutions 

may be arranged at www.court-solutions.com/SignUp not later than 3:00 p.m. the business day 

prior to the hearing. If you are unable to register online, you may register by telephone at (917) 

746-7476.

###

Submitted by:

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Movant is directed to serve a copy of this order to the parties listed below and file a 

Certificate of Service with the Court.

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 120 Filed 05/06/21 Page 2 of 3
Copies furnished to:

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

Ralph Levi Sanders, Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE

Robin R. Weiner

POB 559007

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355

Office of the US Trustee

51 S.W. 1st Ave.

Suite 1204

Miami, FL 33130

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 120 Filed 05/06/21 Page 3 of 3
2012 Base Salary Table for Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.23 
 2012 BASE SALARY TABLE FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The 2012 annual base salaries of the
following Named Executive Officers of Ameren Corporation (Ameren), Union Electric Company (UE), Ameren Illinois Company (AIC) and Ameren Energy Generating Company (Genco) (which officers were determined to the extent applicable by reference to the
Ameren Proxy Statement and the UE and AIC Information Statements, each dated March 9, 2011, for the 2011 annual meetings of shareholders and by reference to the definition of “Named Executive Officer” in Item 402(a)(3) of SEC
Regulation S-K) are as follows: 
  

					
	 Name and Position
	  	2012 Base Salary	 
		
	 Thomas R. Voss

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – Ameren
	  	$	1,000,000	  
		
	 Warner L. Baxter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – UE
	  	$	607,000	  
		
	 Martin J. Lyons, Jr.

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial

Officer – Ameren, UE, AIC and Genco
	  	$	510,000	  
		
	 Steven R. Sullivan

Chairman and President – Genco (effective March 2, 2011)
	  	$	472,000	  
		
	 Charles D. Naslund

Senior Vice President – UE (effective March 2, 2011)
	  	$	450,000	  
		
	 Scott A. Cisel

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – AIC
	  	$	430,000	  
		
	 Adam C. Heflin

Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer – UE
	  	$	417,000	  
		
	 Daniel F. Cole

Senior Vice President – UE, AIC
	  	$	403,000	  
		
	 Jerre E. Birdsong

Vice President and Treasurer – Ameren, UE, AIC and Genco
	  	$	312,300
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1026

EVERETT LIPSCOMB, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CLEARMONT CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-95-2590-AW)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Everett Lipscomb, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John William Kyle, Warren

Malcolm Davison, LITTLER, MENDELSON, FASTIFF & TICHY, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his complaint against his former employer brought pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994), and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995). We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Lipscomb v. Clearmont Constr. & Dev. Co., No. CA-95-2590-AW

(D. Md. Dec. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Normative standards for land use in Vermont: Implications for biodiversity      

      January 1, 2014    

The conversion of natural lands to developed uses poses a great threat to global terrestrial biodiversity. Natural resource managers, tasked with managing wildlife as a public trust, require techniques for predicting how much and where wildlife habitat is likely to be converted in the future. Here, we develop a methodology to estimate the “social carrying capacity for development” – SKd – for 251 towns across the state of Vermont, USA. SKd represents town residents’ minimum acceptable human population size and level of development within town boundaries. To estimate SKd across towns within the state of Vermont (USA), as well as the average state-wide SKd, we administered a visual preference survey (n = 1505 responses) to Vermont residents, and asked respondents to rate alternative landuse scenarios in a fictional Vermont town on a scale of +4 (highly acceptable) to −4 (highly unacceptable). We additionally collected demographic data such as age and income, as well as ancillary information such as participation in town-planning meetings and location of residence. We used model selection and AIC to fit a cubic function to the response data, allowing us to estimate SKd at a town scale based on town demographic characteristics. On average, Vermonters had a SKd of 9.1% development on the landscape; this estimate is 68% higher than year 2000 levels for development (5.4%). Respondents indicated that management action to curb development was appropriate at 9.4% development (roughly the statewide SKd average). Management by local, regional, and state levels were considered acceptable for curbing development while federal level management of development was considered unacceptable. Given a scenario where development levels were at SKd, we predicted a 16,753 km2 reduction in forested land (−11.16%) and a 1038 km2 reduction in farmland (−60.45%). Such changes would dramatically alter biodiversity patterns state-wide. In a companion paper, we estimate how these changes would affect the distribution of wildlife species.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Vermont

View All **
Terry L. BRIGGS v. STATE

CR-15-1119

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.