alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.2**

**NATHANIELENERGY CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Timothy A. Peach, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of NathanielEnergy Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15-(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the smallbusiness issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissue’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 13, 2006

 
|        | By:    | /s/ TIMOTHY A. PEACH    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Timothy A. Peach        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Novel approach for ranking DEMs: Copernicus DEM improves one arc second open global topography      

      February 20, 2024    

We present a practical approach to intercompare a range of candidate digital elevation models (DEMs) based on predefined criteria and a statistically sound ranking approach. The presented approach integrates the randomized complete block design (RCBD) into a novel framework for DEM comparison. The method presented provides a flexible, statistically sound, and customizable tool for evaluating the quality of any raster—in this case, a DEM—by means of a ranking approach, which takes into account a confidence level and can use both quantitative and qualitative criteria. The users can design their own criteria for the quality evaluation in relation to their specific needs. The application of the RCBD method to rank six 1′′ global DEMs, considering a wide set of study sites, covering different morphological and land cover settings, highlights the potentialities of the approach. We used a suite of criteria relating to the differences in the elevation, slope, and roughness distributions compared to reference DEMs aggregated from 1- to 5-m light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-derived DEMs. Results confirmed the significant superiority of Copernicus DEM (CopDEM) 1′′ and its derivative forests and buildings removed DEM (FABDEM) as the overall best 1′′ global DEMs. They are slightly better than Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) and clearly outperform NASADEM and SRTM, which are, in turn, much better than advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Dean Gesch, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

gesch@usgs.gov

605-594-6055

## Related Content

#### Dean Gesch, Ph.D.

##### Research Physical Scientist

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

gesch@usgs.gov

605-594-6055

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547
Jonathan Mikeal RAYNES v. STATE

CR-15-0767

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at  December  31, 1999 and the Statement of
Income for the 7 months ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001088758
<NAME>     Healthcare Software, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-17-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          66
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      2000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1934)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             81934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (81934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (81934)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (81934)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
Victor Ortiz LOPEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0066

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# L_2004224EN.01005001.xml

| 25.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 224/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 224/50

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1178/2004

of 24 June 2004

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004 of 19 May 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 18 to 24 June 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be EUR 22,80/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 28.

3

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Reconnaissance during 1952 for uranium-bearing carbonaceous rocks in parts of Colorado, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming      

      January 1, 1953    

View Document

A reconnaissance for uranium-bearing carbonaceous rocks was made during the 1952 field season in 23 areas in Colorado, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming. Uranium in small amounts occurs in several of the areas examined, but no deposits were found that might have commercial possibilities. As much as 0.03 percent uranium is in the ash of coal in the Caribou Mountain area in southwestern Idaho; 0.012 percent in the ash of coal in the Burnt Fork area of southwestern Wyoming; and 0.009 percent in the ash of coal from near Driggs in eastern Idaho. Seven additional areas were examined in which beds of coal or carbonaceous shale contained more than 0.002 but less than 0.007 percent uranium in the ash. Unweathered samples of bituminous sandstone from the Vernal area, Utah, contain minor quantities of uranium.

ilities.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado;Idaho;Utah;Wyoming
                  - Colorado
                  - Idaho
                  - Utah
                  - Wyoming

View All **
Christopher R. NORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Vista International Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


VISTA
      INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: May
      20, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Barry J. KembleBarry
      J. KembleChief
      Executive
Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3624 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To amend section 31311 of title 49, United States Code, 

to permit States to issue commercial driver’s licenses 

to members of the Armed Forces whose duty station 

is located in the State. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

S 3624 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Commercial 

3 Driver’s License Act of 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DOMICILE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL DRIV5 ER’S LICENSE. 

6 Section 31311(a)(12) of title 49, United States Code, 

7 is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(12)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs 

9 (B) and (C), the State may issue a commercial driv10 er’s license only to an individual who operates or will 

11 operate a commercial motor vehicle and is domiciled 

12 in the State. 

13 ‘‘(B) Under regulations prescribed by the Sec14 retary, the State may issue a commercial driver’s li15 cense to an individual who— 

16 ‘‘(i) operates or will operate a commercial 

17 motor vehicle; and 

18 ‘‘(ii) is not domiciled in a State that issues 

19 commercial driver’s licenses. 

20 ‘‘(C) The State may issue a commercial driver’s 

21 license to an individual who— 

22 ‘‘(i) operates or will operate a commercial 

23 motor vehicle; 

24 ‘‘(ii) is a member of the active duty mili25 tary, military reserves, National Guard, active 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

S 3624 RFH

1 duty United States Coast Guard, or Coast 

2 Guard Auxiliary; and 

3 ‘‘(iii) is not domiciled in the State, but 

4 whose temporary or permanent duty station is 

5 located in the State.’’. 

Passed the Senate September 22 (legislative day, 

September 21), 2012. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel
Sheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      March 6, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Samuel ShengSamuel
      Sheng
                      Chief
      Financial Officer (principal financial and
                      accounting
      officer)
# L_2004333EN.01000401.xml

| 9.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 333/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 333/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1932/2004

of 8 November 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), lays down that intervention butter placed on sale must have entered into storage before 1 June 2002. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), lays down that intervention butter placed on sale must have entered into storage before 1 June 2002.

| (2) | Given the situation on the butter market and the quantities of butter in intervention storage it is appropriate that butter in storage before 1 January 2003 should be available for sale. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the situation on the butter market and the quantities of butter in intervention storage it is appropriate that butter in storage before 1 January 2003 should be available for sale.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, the date ‘1 June 2002’ is replaced by the date ‘1 January 2003’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1448/2004 (OJ L 267, 14.8.2004, p. 30).

2

---
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Samuel Sheng,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
        1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
        to be
        incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
        or
        after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
        such
        filing.
 
  Date:
                  November 14, 2008
              By:
              /s/
Samuel
                ShengSamuel
                  Sheng
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                (principal
                  financial andaccounting
                  officer)
Order entered February 13 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01294

- CV

JAMES D. ANDERTON, A S TRUSTEE OF THE JIM MIE W. ANDERTON AND FRANCES E. ANDERTON REVOCABL E LIVING TRUST AGREE MENT, Appellant

V.

JENNIFER GREEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 79011



### O RDER

Before the Court is the February 12, 2020 second request of Julie Vrooman, Offi cial

C ourt Reporter for the 354 th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s

record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to March 11, 2020 . We caution Ms.

Vrooman that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MO LBERG JUSTICE
Sylvia F. MINOR v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION

2014-CT-00372-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 3, 2018 Closed: July 26, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

p0129 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139021 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139021 

 COA: 290008 

Wayne CC: 04-008300 

JONATHAN PATRICK ROSE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.