alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: AVA C. BENJAMIN Case Number 19-25801-LMI

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for May 4, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the May 4, 2020 hearing 

were due as of April 16, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "re-sending" 

documents)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears and agrees on the record:

Continue to 5/28 for debtor to provide/file: ***Florida DoR in plan no POC filed (bar date 5/20)***

Case 19-25801-LMI Doc 53 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 1
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NORA COMBS, 1

Respondent Below, Appellant,

v.

DEREK WYNN,

Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § No. 433, 2019 § § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware § § File No. CN18-01054 § Petition No. 19-19013 § § §

Submitted: December 31, 2019 Decided: January 10, 2020

ORDER

On December 17, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, by certified

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed

for her failure to pay the Family Court fili ng fee and transcript fee. The appellant

has failed to respond to the notice to show caus e. Dismissal of this action is therefore

deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, unde r Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Suprem e Court Rule 7(d).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 52 (Friday, March 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 14466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10317]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 26208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X02-30503]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II--Continued





Department of Justice





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Antitrust Division



United States v. Microsoft Corporation; Public Comments; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 86 / Friday, 
May 3, 2002 / Notices

[[Page 26208]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           M≥7 Earthquake rupture forecast and time-dependent probability for the Sea of Marmara region, Turkey      

      July 7, 2016    

We forecast time-independent and time-dependent earthquake ruptures in the Marmara region of Turkey for the next 30 years using a new fault-segmentation model. We also augment time-dependent Brownian Passage Time (BPT) probability with static Coulomb stress changes (ΔCFF) from interacting faults. We calculate Mw > 6.5 probability from 26 individual fault sources in the Marmara region. We also consider a multisegment rupture model that allows higher-magnitude ruptures over some segments of the Northern branch of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NNAF) beneath the Marmara Sea. A total of 10 different Mw=7.0 to Mw=8.0 multisegment ruptures are combined with the other regional faults at rates that balance the overall moment accumulation. We use Gaussian random distributions to treat parameter uncertainties (e.g., aperiodicity, maximum expected magnitude, slip rate, and consequently mean recurrence time) of the statistical distributions associated with each fault source. We then estimate uncertainties of the 30-year probability values for the next characteristic event obtained from three different models (Poisson, BPT, and BPT+ΔCFF) using a Monte Carlo procedure. The Gerede fault segment located at the eastern end of the Marmara region shows the highest 30-yr probability, with a Poisson value of 29%, and a time-dependent interaction probability of 48%. We find an aggregated 30-yr Poisson probability of M >7.3 earthquakes at Istanbul of 35%, which increases to 47% if time dependence and stress transfer are considered. We calculate a 2-fold probability gain (ratio time-dependent to time-independent) on the southern strands of the North Anatolian Fault Zone.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Tom Parsons

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

tparsons@usgs.gov

650-439-2374

## Related Content

#### Tom Parsons

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

tparsons@usgs.gov

650-439-2374

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

### Explore Search

                  - turkey
                  - Sea if Marmara

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the quarterly  report of Hawksdale  Financial  Visions,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quaarter  ended  September 30, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Thomas Stanley Babcock,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and
Director  of the  Company,  certifies  for the  purpose of  complying  with Rule
13a-14(b)  or  Rule  15d-14(b)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (the
"Exchange  Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: August 26, 2004                    By:  /s/ THOMAS STANLEY BABCOCK
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Thomas Stanley Babcock
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Savi Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
      Hukriede, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Savi Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by Savi Media Group, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                August 21, 2006
            By:*/s/ GEORGE HUKRIEDE*George
                HukriedeChief
                Financial Officer
Case 19-20780-RAM Doc 7 Filed 08/13/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-20780-RAM Doc 7 Filed 08/13/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-20780-RAM Doc 7 Filed 08/13/19 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Marin Tsunami (video)      

      February 27, 2010    

Tsunamis are a constant threat to the coasts of our world. Although tsunamis are infrequent along the West coast of the United States, it is possible and necessary to prepare for potential tsunami hazards to minimize loss of life and property. Community awareness programs are important, as they strive to create an informed society by providing education and training. 

The Marin coast could be struck by a tsunami. Whether you live in Marin County, visit the beaches, or rent or own a home near the coast, it is vital to understand the tsunami threat and take preparation seriously. Marin Tsunami tells the story of what several West Marin communities are doing to be prepared. 

This video was produced by the US Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the Marin Office of Emergency Services.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Moon-Mercury: Large impact structures, isostasy and average crustal viscosity      

      January 1, 1977    

Thirty-five craters and basins larger than 200 km in diameter are recognized on the imaged portion (45%) of Mercury. If the unimaged portion of the planet is similarly cratered, a total of 78 such impact features may be present. Sixty-two craters and basins 200 km in diameter are recognized on the moon, a body with only half the cross-sectional area of Mercury. If surface areas are considered, however, Mercury is cratered only 70% as densely as the moon. The density of impact craters with diameters greater than 400 km on Mercury is only 30% of that on the moon, and for craters with diameters between 400 and 700 km, the density on Mercury is only 21% of the lunar crater density. The size-frequency distribution curve for the large Mercurian craters follows the same cumulative -2 slope as the lunar curve but lies well below the 10% surface saturation level characteristic of the lunar curve. This is taken as evidence that the old heavily cratered terrain on Mercury is, at least presently, not in a state of cratering equilibrium. The reduced density of large craters and basins on Mercury relative to the moon could be either a function of the crater-production rates on these bodies or an effect of different crustal histories. Resurfacing of the planet after the basin-forming period is ruled out by the presence of 54 craters and basins 100 km in diameter and larger (on the imaged portion of Mercury) that have either well-defined or poorly-defined secondary-crater fields. Total isostatic compensation of impact craters ???800 km in diameter indicates that the average viscosity of the Mercurian crust over the past 4+ aeons was the same as that for the moon (???1026.5 P). This calculated viscosity and the distribution of large craters and basins suggest that either the very early crustal viscosity on Mercury was less than that of the moon and the present viscosity greater, or the differences in large crater populations on the two bodies is indeed the result of variations in rates of crater production. ?? 1977.

## Citation Information
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No. 18-16248-BKC-MAM 

 Chapter 7 

CHANCE & ANTHEM, LLC, 

 

 Debtor. 

 / 

ROBERT C. FURR not individually but ADV. NO. 19-01298-MAM 

as Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of the 

Debtor, Chance & Anthem, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEFFREY M. SISKIND, individually and 

d/b/a SISKIND LEGAL SERVICES, 

TANYA SISKIND, individually and as Trustee of the, 

SECOND SISKIND FAMILY TRUST, 

FRANK ZOKAITES, individually, 

CANNAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, 

a Maryland Limited Liability Company, 

OB REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS 1732, LLC, a 

Florida Limited Liability Company, 

SISKIND LEGAL SERVICES, LLC, 

a Florida Limited Liability Company, 

SOVEREIGN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, 

a Florida Limited Liability Company 

FLORIDA'S ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY 

BANKS AND CREDIT UNIONS, INC. a Florida Corporation, 

SYMPATICO EQUINE RESCUE, INC, a Florida Corporation, 

WELLINGTON 3445, LP, a Florida Limited Partnership, 

ZOKAITES PROPERTIES, LP, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership, 

and ROBERT GIBSON, individually. 

 Defendants. 

 / 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Jesus M. Suarez, Esq., certify that service of the Adversary Complaint [ECF No. 1], the 

Alias Summons [ECF No. 14], and the Order Setting Filing and Disclosure Requirements for 

Pretrial and Trial [ECF No. 4] was made on August 26, 2019 via: 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 16 Filed 08/26/19 Page 1 of 3
2

[X] Mail Service: Regular First Class U.S. Mail and Certified Mail, Postage Fully PrePaid, addressed to the parties indicated on the Service List below. 

[ ] Personal Service: By leaving the process with defendant or with an officer or agent of 

defendant at: 

[ ] Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at: 

[ ] Certified Mail Service on an Insured Depository Institution: By sending the process by 

certified mail addressed to the following officer of the defendant at: 

[ ] Publication: The defendant was served as follows: [Describe briefly] 

[ ] State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of 

__________________, as follows: [Describe briefly] 

If service was made by personal service, by residence service, or pursuant to state law, I further 

certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 18 years of age 

and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made. 

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Date: August 26, 2019 Signature: /s/ Jesus M. Suarez Esq. 

 Print Name: Jesus M. Suarez, Esq., 

FBN 60086 

Address: 100 SE 2nd Street, 44th Floor 

City: Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: (305) 349-2300 

E-mail: jsuarez@gjb-law.com 

 

 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 16 Filed 08/26/19 Page 2 of 3
3

SERVICE LIST 

SECRETARY OF STATE 

R.A. GRAY BUILDING 

500 SOUTH BRONOUGH STREET 

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 

SECRETARY OF STATE 

P. O. BOX 6327 

TALLAHASSEE, FL 32314 

SECRETARY OF STATE 

CLIFTON BUILDING 

2661 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE 

TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 16 Filed 08/26/19 Page 3 of 3
Treyston Kristopher MULDER, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF JACKSON COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0354 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 072 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350B, BA, B1, B2, B3, D, AS355E, F, F1, F2, and N Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operat ors): 72 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent reduced yaw control and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 161 Labor per Helicopter ( 1 work - hour x $ 8 5 /work hour for the inspection/installation ) $ 85 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $246 Total US Fleet Cost $17,712 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Gary

Roach
Final Exhibit 10.36 - Form of Adjustment Amendment to Option Award_ Agreement






Exhibit 10.36


ALERIS CORPORATION 
2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




TO:    [Participant]


FROM:    Aleris Corporation
		
	RE: 
	Form of Amendment  _____ to Option Award Agreement


DATE:    ________________
On ______, 20__,  you were granted an Option to purchase shares of common stock of Aleris Corporation, fka Aleris Holding Company (the “Company”) and issued an Award Agreement, which you subsequently signed and accepted.  The Option was granted under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which was attached to the Award Agreement.  We are amending your Award Agreement by issuing this Amendment ___ in order to reflect adjustments made by a special committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, in light of the $________ cash dividend that the Company issued on ____________, 20__ to stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock as of ___________, 20__.  Your Option remains subject in all respects to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Award Agreement, as amended by this Amendment ___.
		
	A.
	Section 1(c) of the Award Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 


Number of Shares and Exercise Price per Share:  Your Option is  ___________________, with __________ Exercise Price[(s), if applicable,] as follows:	
			
	 
	Number of Shares
	Exercise Price

	 
	 
	 

	[FMV Stock Option/
 Premium Stock Option/
Super-Premium Stock Option, as applicable]
	___________
	$__________

	 
	 
	 

	TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES
	___________
	 




		
	B.
	For the avoidance of doubt, the adjusted number of shares underlying your __________ [FMV Stock Options/Premium Stock Options/Super-Premium Stock Options, as applicable] and as set forth in section 1(c), will apply to those [FMV Stock Options/Premium Stock Options/Super-Premium Stock Options, as applicable] that are vested and unvested as of the date of this Amendment. 


		
	C.
	This Amendment ___ is being made in accordance with the Adjustment of Shares and Amendment provisions of the Plan. 


		
	D.
	With the exception of the modifications set forth in this Amendment ___, all other provisions of the Award Agreement shall remain unchanged, and in full force and effect.


Sincerely,
 
[Company Representative]
Title: _______________________
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129033 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, IN RE PAROLE OF JOSEPH W. Justices BUCKNER.

________________ _______________ __________/

JOSEPH WALTER BUCKNER, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 129033 COA: 258861 Ingham CC: 03-000994-AP PAROLE BOARD, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 22, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal.

l1208 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 30, 2009)]
[Contents]
[Pages vi-vii]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



 
 
      CFR PARTS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE
 __________________________________________________________
 A cumulative list of the parts affected this month can be 
 found in the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue.
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 30, 2009 / 
Contents  

  Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 30, 2009 / 
Contents  

  Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 30, 2009 / 
Contents  

[[Page vii]]



                           3 CFR
Proclamations:
8467.................................................69221
8468.................................................69229
Executive Orders:
13525................................................69231

                          10 CFR
Proposed Rules:
431..................................................69036

                          14 CFR
234..................................................68983
253..................................................68983
259..................................................68983
399..................................................68983
Proposed Rules:
39............................................69038, 69040

                          17 CFR
1....................................................69004
275..................................................69009

                          19 CFR
111..................................................69015
113..................................................69015
141..................................................69015
142..................................................69015
143..................................................69015

                          26 CFR
1....................................................69021
Proposed Rules:
1....................................................69043

                          29 CFR
403..................................................69023
408..................................................69023

                          33 CFR
117 (2 documents).............................69027, 69028
Proposed Rules:
100..................................................69044
165..................................................69046

                          39 CFR
Proposed Rules:
111..................................................69049

                          40 CFR
63...................................................69194
261..................................................69028
Proposed Rules:
52...................................................69049
58...................................................69050

                          47 CFR
73...................................................69035
Proposed Rules:
73 (2 documents)..............................69059, 69060