alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Edward Suydam, the Chief Executive Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-K of Nano Mask for the year ended December 30, 2008 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.  /s/ Edward Suydam Edward Suydam Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Nano Mask, Inc.  August 1, 2011
Case 19-25604-RAM Doc 60 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-25604-RAM Doc 60 Filed 07/23/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-25604-RAM Doc 60 Filed 07/23/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Leveraging rangeland monitoring data for wildlife: From concept to practice      

      March 4, 2022    

Available rangeland data, from field-measured plots to remotely sensed landscapes, provide much needed information for mapping and modeling wildlife habitats.

Better integration of wildlife habitat characteristics into rangeland monitoring schemes is needed for most rangeland wildlife species at varying spatial and temporal scales.

Here, we aim to stimulate use of and inspire ideas about rangeland monitoring data in the context of wildlife habitat modeling and species conservation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### David S Pilliod

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

dpilliod@usgs.gov

208-387-1363

## Related Content

#### David S Pilliod

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

dpilliod@usgs.gov

208-387-1363

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Great Plains
                  - Colorado
                  -  Kansas
                  -  Montana
                  -  Nebraska
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  North Dakota
                  -  Oklahoma
                  -  South Dakota
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
Willie WEAVER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 2, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Joanne Diez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           New model of the Barry Arm landslide in Alaska reveals potential tsunami wave heights of 2 meters, values much lower than previously estimated      

      May 24, 2022    

View Report

XML Format

The retreat of Barry Glacier has contributed to the destabilization of slopes in Barry Arm, creating the possibility that a landslide could rapidly enter the fjord and trigger a tsunami.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently released a report documenting potential tsunami wave heights in the event of a large, fast-moving landslide at the Barry Arm fiord near Prince William Sound, Alaska (Barnhart and others, 2021). This new work shows that the largest plausible wave height is smaller than initial estimates published in Dai and others (2020), but waves still represent a substantial hazard to the people who live, work, and recreate in Prince William Sound. Thus, it is important that residents and visitors remain informed about this hazard and prepare accordingly.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Marisa Macias

##### Geologist / Web Content Manager

Geologic Hazards Science Center

mmacias@usgs.gov

#### Katherine Barnhart

##### Research Civil Engineer

Landslide Hazards Program

krbarnhart@usgs.gov

303-273-8582

#### Dennis Michael Staley

##### Geomorphologist, Physical Geographer

Alaska Volcano Observatory

dstaley@usgs.gov

907-786-7423

## Related Content

#### Marisa Macias

##### Geologist / Web Content Manager

Geologic Hazards Science Center

mmacias@usgs.gov

#### Katherine Barnhart

##### Research Civil Engineer

Landslide Hazards Program

krbarnhart@usgs.gov

303-273-8582

#### Dennis Michael Staley

##### Geomorphologist, Physical Geographer

Alaska Volcano Observatory

dstaley@usgs.gov

907-786-7423

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Barry Arm landslide
                  - Alaska

View All **
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

___2013

_______ - NM -

_____ 24 7

_____ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 19-26046-BKC-AJC

CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

GERARDO ARIAS EMERGENCY HEARING REQUESTED

Debtor.

 /

DEBTOR'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RE-HEARING AND MOTION FOR

REINSTATEMENT OF CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY

 (The emergency nature of this motion is that the Debtor's property is in

foreclosure and the creditor filed an Ex Parte Motion to Reschedule the Foreclosure Sale)

The Debtor, GERARDO ARIAS, moves this Honorable Court for an Order Granting

Re-Hearing of the dismissal entered and reinstating the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy and states:

1. An Order dismissing the case was entered on September 7, 2022, for the

Debtors' failure to remain current. 

2. The undersigned is holding in trust the sum of $3,746.34, which brings

them current under his fifteenth Amended Chapter 13 Plan and he intends to remain

current in all future payments.

CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL RULE 9075-I

3. The emergency nature of this motion is that the Debtor's property is in

foreclosure and the secured creditor, Towhhouses at Jacaranda Condominium

Association, Inc., filed an Ex Parte Motion to Reschedule the Foreclosure Sale.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court set forth in Local

Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed to Nancy Neidich, Trustee at

e2c8f01@ch13herkert.com, Kevin G. Peters, counsel for Townhouse at Jacaranda Condo at

kevin@petersandpeterspa.com and and all others set forth in the NEF this 19th day of September, 2022,

and this Motion and an upcoming Notice of Hearing will be served via email on a separate Certificate of

Service to those set forth in the NEF and by regular mail to Peters & Peters, P.A., 9900 Stirling Road, Suite 104,

Cooper City, FL 33024 and to all creditors.

Law Offices of Michael A. Frank

& Rodolfo H. De La Guardia, Jr.

Attorneys for the Debtor

2000 Northwest 89 Place, Suite 201

th

Doral, FL 33172

Telephone (305) 443-4217

Email- Pleadings@bkclawmiami.com

By /s/ Michael A. Frank

Michael A. Frank

Florida Bar No. 339075

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 245 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Anthony F. Rabito, Jr., et al., Petitioners.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County,

July 19, 1973.

*Charles Golden*for petitioners.

Joseph Life, J.

The parties, both over 18 years of age and not yet 21, have asked the court to consent to and approve a *374separation agreement (Domestic Relations Law, § 170, subds. [6] and [6-a]). The latter subdivision became effective last September 1. So far as we have been able to determine the present application is novel and there is only one reference to it in a reported decision *(Matter of Neil M.*v. *Gregory M.,*71 Misc 2d 396, 400), which is not relevant to the matter here under consideration.

The agreement cannot be approved. The agreement together with an affidavit of the parties and a proposed order was submitted by an attorney. Although the agreement recites (par. “ eleventh ”) that it was “fully explained to both parties by their own counsel ”, nowhere does it appear that each was in fact represented and advised by separate counsel. Another reason for withholding approval is paragraph “ seventh ”. This provision contains the agreement for weekly alimony* maintenance and support for the child. Having stated the amount, it goes on to say that it would be reduced by a specified amount whenever the child reaches 21 or marries. Then it recites that in the event the parties were divorced and the wife remarried, that would have no effect on the provision for the support of the child, but we are not told what that would be.

It is not our function to prepare an agreement for the parties. Attention is directed to section 5-311 of the General Obligations Law. This determination, of course, is without prejudice to the renewal of the application.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Long-term decline in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the western basin of Lake Erie      

      January 1, 1991    

Long-term trends in the abundance of unionids in the western basin of Lake Erie were examined from data collected at 17 stations in 1961, 1972, and 1982. The mean number of unionids at these stations declined over this time period, decreasing from 10 m−2 in 1961, to 6 m−2 in 1972, down to 4 m−2 in 1982. This decline in abundance was reflected in the decrease in the number of stations where mussels were found; unionids were found at 16 of the 17 stations in 1961, but at only 6 stations in 1982. Reasons for the decrease in the unionid population are not generally apparent, but are probably related to the decline in water quality and periods of low oxygen levels over the time period of the surveys.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Bruce A Manny (Former Employee)          

##### Scientist Emeritus

Great Lakes Science Center

## Related Content

####             Bruce A Manny (Former Employee)          

##### Scientist Emeritus

Great Lakes Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Great Lakes Science Center          

1451 Green RoadAnn Arbor, MI48105United States

734-994-3331

734-994-8780

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Lake Erie

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4742 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4742

To authorize the National Science Foundation to support entrepreneurial 
                          programs for women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2016

  Ms. Esty (for herself, Mrs. Comstock, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of 
Texas, and Mr. Smith of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the National Science Foundation to support entrepreneurial 
                          programs for women.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Women in Entrepreneurship 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) women make up almost 50 percent of the workforce, but 
        less than 25 percent of the workforce in science, technology, 
        engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professions;
            (2) women are less likely to focus on the STEM disciplines 
        in undergraduate and graduate study;
            (3) only 26 percent of women who do attain degrees in STEM 
        fields work in STEM jobs;
            (4) there is an increasing demand for individuals with STEM 
        degrees to extend their focus beyond the laboratory so they can 
        be leaders in discovery commercialization;
            (5) studies have shown that technology and 
        commercialization ventures are successful when women are in top 
        management positions; and
            (6) the National Science Foundation's mission includes 
        supporting women in STEM disciplines.

SEC. 3. SUPPORTING WOMEN'S ENTREPRENEURIAL PROGRAMS.

    Section 33 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1885a) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (10);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (11) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) encourage its entrepreneurial programs to recruit 
        and support women to extend their focus beyond the laboratory 
        and into the commercial world.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-11044

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Donald Matthew Basta, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 1:19-CR-120-1 

Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Donald Basta has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and 

United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Basta has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 15, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-11044 Document: 00515899669 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2021
No. 20-11044

2

record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-11044 Document: 00515899669 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2021
Kruise Lamar CRUMEDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5342

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jackson SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5328 2D16-5643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20216]



                                                    VOL. 60, NO. 32

                                        Thursday, February 16, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 32/Thursday, February 16, 1995/
Corrections
[[Page 9079]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

7 CFR Part 1755


Standard for Splicing Copper and Fiber Optic Cables

Correction

    In rule document 95-1937 beginning on page 5096 in the issue of 
Thursday, January 26, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 1755.200  [Corrected]

    On page 5099, in the second column, in Sec. 1755.200(d)(4)(ii), in 
Table 5, in the middle column heading ``Maximum straight splice maximum 
load splice pair'' should read ``Maximum straight splice pair''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# L_2004370EN.01006901.xml

| 17.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 370/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 370/69

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2163/2004

of 16 December 2004

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 10 to 16 December 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be 29,46 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Pathology of tissue loss (white syndrome) in *Acropora* sp. corals from the Central Pacific      

      September 28, 2011    

We performed histological examination of 69 samples of Acropora sp. manifesting different types of tissue loss (Acropora White Syndrome-AWS) from Hawaii, Johnston Atoll and American Samoa between 2002 and 2006. Gross lesions of tissue loss were observed and classified as diffuse acute, diffuse subacute, and focal to multifocal acute to subacute. Corals with acute tissue loss manifested microscopic evidence of necrosis sometimes associated with ciliates, helminths, fungi, algae, sponges, or cyanobacteria whereas those with subacute tissue loss manifested mainly wound repair. Gross lesions of AWS have multiple different changes at the microscopic level some of which involve various microorganisms and metazoa. Elucidating this disease will require, among other things, monitoring lesions over time to determine the pathogenesis of AWS and the potential role of tissue-associated microorganisms in the genesis of tissue loss. Attempts to experimentally induce AWS should include microscopic examination of tissues to ensure that potentially causative microorganisms associated with gross lesion are not overlooked.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Thierry M Work

##### Wildlife Disease Specialist

National Wildlife Health Center

thierry_work@usgs.gov

808-792-9520

## Related Content

#### Thierry M Work

##### Wildlife Disease Specialist

National Wildlife Health Center

thierry_work@usgs.gov

808-792-9520

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - American Samoa
                  -  French Frigate Shoals
                  -  Johnston Atoll
                  - Hawai'i

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 333 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 333

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12063, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section--
            (1) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of project works to the 
        end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
        this Act; or
            (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has been 
        terminated, reinstate the license and extend the time period 
        during which the licensee is required to commence the 
        construction of project works to the end of the 3-year period 
        beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate October 18, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 333

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.
```