alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LETTER OF CONSENT








TO:     Pengrowth Energy Corporation


2100, 222-3 rd Avenue SW


Calgary, Alberta T2P OB4


We hereby consent to the reference to our name and report evaluating Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2015 and the information derived from our reports, as described or incorporated by reference in: (i) Pengrowth Energy Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 and (ii) the Registration Statements on Form F-3D (File No. 333-180888) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-204089) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.


Yours truly,


GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.








/s/ "Todd J. Ikeda"


Todd J. Ikeda, P. Eng


Vice President





Calgary, Alberta


February 24, 2016


______________________________________________________________


4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2  |  (403) 266-9500  | GLJPC.com
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Loss of eelgrass in Casco Bay, Maine, linked to Green Crab disturbance      

      August 25, 2015    

Over half of the Zostera marina (Eelgrass) cover disappeared from Casco Bay, ME, largely between 2012 and 2013. Eelgrass decline coincided with a population explosion of the invasive crab Carcinus maenas (European Green Crab). Green Crabs have been found to damage Eelgrass in Atlantic Canada through foraging activity, but destruction of established beds had not been documented in Maine. My objective was to determine whether loss of Eelgrass from Casco Bay was related to Green Crab disturbance. In September 2013, I transplanted Eelgrass shoots inside and outside of replicate Green Crab exclosures in a formerly vegetated area of upper Casco Bay. Following 26 d, mean survival of Eelgrass inside the exclosures was 82% and outside the exclosures was 24%. The mean plastochrone interval (time between formation of 2 successive leaves) of undamaged shoots was the same inside and outside the exclosures, and was comparable to published values from healthy Eelgrass beds in New England. Results implicate Green Crab bioturbation as a leading cause of Eelgrass loss from this system.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Hilary Neckles, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

## Related Content

####             Hilary Neckles, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - casco bay
                  -  Maquoit Bay
                  - maine

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Methodological considerations for detection of terrestrial small-body salamander eDNA and implications for biodiversity conservation      

      April 1, 2017    

Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used as an assessment tool to detect populations of threatened species and provide fine-scale data required to make management decisions. The objectives of this project were to use quantitative PCR (qPCR) to: (i) detect spiked salamander DNA in soil, (ii) quantify eDNA degradation over time, (iii) determine detectability of salamander eDNA in a terrestrial environment using soil, faeces, and skin swabs, (iv) detect salamander eDNA in a mesocosm experiment. Salamander eDNA was positively detected in 100% of skin swabs and 66% of faecal samples and concentrations did not differ between the two sources. However, eDNA was not detected in soil samples collected from directly underneath wild-caught living salamanders. Salamander genomic DNA (gDNA) was detected in all qPCR reactions when spiked into soil at 10.0, 5.0, and 1.0 ng/g soil and spike concentration had a significant effect on detected concentrations. Only 33% of samples showed recoverable eDNA when spiked with 0.25 ng/g soil, which was the low end of eDNA detection. To determine the rate of eDNA degradation, gDNA (1 ng/g soil) was spiked into soil and quantified over seven days. Salamander eDNA concentrations decreased across days, but eDNA was still amplifiable at day 7. Salamander eDNA was detected in two of 182 mesocosm soil samples over 12 weeks (n = 52 control samples; n = 65 presence samples; n = 65 eviction samples). The discrepancy in detection success between experiments indicates the potential challenges for this method to be used as a monitoring technique for small-bodied wild terrestrial salamander populations.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Mark Rogers, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mwrogers@usgs.gov

931-372-3032

## Related Content

#### Mark Rogers, PhD

##### Research Fish Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

mwrogers@usgs.gov

931-372-3032

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3642 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3642

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To clarify the scope of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 1832(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``or included in a product 
that is produced for or placed in'' and inserting ``a product or 
service used in or intended for use in''.

            Passed the Senate November 27, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3642

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To clarify the scope of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996.
```
Letter of Intent





This letter of intent will outline, subject to a formal Offer, the terms and conditions under which Syngas International Corp., will offer to purchase Salmon Arm Plastics Ltd.





Purchaser:

Syngas International Corp.





Sellers:

Grant Bennett, Jack Bowers, Peter Robertson





1.

Share Exchange:



Syngas International Corp. will issue 1 million shares (144 legend) for 100% of the shares of Salmon Arm Plastics Ltd., provided that the financial statements indicating assets and liabilities to be assumed are reasonably similar to those disclosed.



2.

Shareholders Loans:



Syngas International Corp. will issue 1.12 million shares (144 legend) as repayment of $400,000 worth of shareholders loans.



Syngas International Corp. will issue a convertible debenture for the balance of the shareholders loans.  The debenture will carry an interest rate of 8% per annum paid quarterly, with the principal amount due in two years.  The debenture is fully convertible, at the option of the holder to common shares of Syngas International Corp. (144 legend), at a 10% discount to market price.  Market price will be the average closing price of the stock for the previous ten days.  The holder shall have registration rights so that upon conversion, the stock shall be free trading.



The intent of this clause is to facilitate present shareholders request to have the ability to liquidate atleast $250,000 worth of shareholders loans as, and when convenient for the shareholder, but no later than January 30, 2007.



3.

Line of Credit:



Once the purchase is effected, Syngas International Corp. will obtain, or make available a credit facility such as a line of credit or loan for a minimum amount of $500,000 for the exclusive use of Salmon Arm Plastics Ltd. for the growth of the business.



4.

SEC Requirements:



Salmon Arm Plastics Ltd. would undertake to perform all necessary financial reviews, requirements and audits to comply with SEC requirements.



5.

Management:



Grant Bennett, President of Salmon Arm Plastics Ltd. would agree to serve as a director of Syngas International Corp., and agree to enter into an exclusive management contract for the management of the plastics subsidiary for a minimum term of three years, to be overseen by a corporate management committee.



By:

Accepted by:





/s/ Wilf Ouellette

/s/ Grant Bennett

Wilf Ouellette, Syngas International Corp

Grant Bennett, Salmon Arm Plastics Ltd





/s/ Jack Bowers



Jack Bowers







/s/ Peter Robertson



Peter Robertson
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11716 and #11717]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of FLORIDA (FEMA—1831—DR), dated 04/21/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds *Incident Period:*
                         03/26/2009 and continuing. *Effective Date:*
                         04/21/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/22/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/21/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 04/21/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Bay, Calhoun, Gulf, Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Liberty, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Walton, Washington. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 117166 and for economic injury is 117176. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-9923 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,769
<PP&E>                                         104,676
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 485,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,329,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       882,568
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,755,725)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   485,464
<SALES>                                            672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   672
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,214,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,214,305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,214,305)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,214,305)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.87)



</TABLE>
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 18

- 00740

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 2018

- 23761

Style: Wayne Myers

v Pennymac Corporation

Date motion filed * : January 28, 2020

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to file Rehearing, S uggestion of Death, and Motion to

Substitute P roper Party

Party filing motion: Charlie Jones

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If doc ument is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Ju dge's signature: /s/ Richard Hightower

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Ch ief Justice Radack a nd Justices Landau and Hightower.

Date: March 5, 2020
David Lee CALLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3616

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

Joseph C. Bodiford and Gannon M. Coens of Bodiford Law, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
exv10w13



 





Exhibit 10.13




VOCUS, INC.




COMPENSATION POLICY FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS



Effective as of January 1, 2008, the compensation payable to the non-employee members of the board
of directors of Vocus, Inc. shall be as follows:




Annual Retainer





	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $40,000. The retainer for service as a director includes meeting
fees, service on one committee and informal meetings with the CEO and management as
necessary.
	 
	 	•	 	The chairperson of the audit committee and the lead director/chairperson of the
compensation committee shall receive an additional retainer of $10,000.
	 
	 	•	 	The annual retainer payable to directors shall be paid in restricted stock or cash.
Each director will communicate his/her preference before January 31. Cash payments will
be paid within a reasonable number of days after the end of the rolling quarter (i.e.
4/30, 7/31, 10/31 and 1/31) with 25% of the total retainer paid each quarterly.
Restricted stock will be granted on January 31 and 25% of the shares vest on the last day
of each rolling quarter of the service year.





Stock Based Compensation





	 	•	 	Each director shall receive a grant of options to purchase shares of the Company’s
common stock with the amount and vesting of such awards determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors or the Board of Directors of the Company.
	 
	 	•	 	Each director shall receive a restricted stock award with the amount and vesting of
such awards determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or the
Board of Directors of the Company.
	 
	 	•	 	The chairperson of the audit committee and the lead director/chairperson of the
compensation committee shall receive additional grants of stock options with the amount
and vesting of such awards determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors or the Board of Directors of the Company.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1736

In re: DAVID HILL , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria . ( 1:01

- cr - 00191

- CMH

- 1; 1:20

- cv - 00474

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : November 10, 2022 Decided: June 23, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE , Circuit Judge , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1736 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition transferred to Hill’s criminal case. Hill seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, by order entered on September 21, 2022, the district court denied the § 2241 petition identified in the instant mandamus petition. See United States v. Hill , No. 1:01

- cr - 00191

- CMH

- 1 (E.D. Va. PACER N o. 453). Accordingly, because the district court recently decided Hill’s petition, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court a nd argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1736 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Memorandum on pumping test at Ambridge, Pennsylvania      

      January 1, 1950    

View Document

By arrangment with Mr. J. Z. Columbia, Superintendent of the Ambridge Water Works, the United States Geological Survey conducted a "pumping test" in the Ambridge well field on November 10, 1949. As used in this report, "pumping test" means pumping a well at a fixed rate to determine the hydrologic properties of the water-bearing formation. By measuring the decline and recovery of water level in the pumped well and in other observation wells the necessary information is obtained for computing these properties.

Such procedures are part of the field activities of the ground-water program in Pennsylvania being sponsored jointly by the Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey and the United States Geological Survey.

The amount of water that can be pumped from an underground formation depends upon its ability to transmit water to a well and upon the amount of water that is released from storage when the water table or pressure head is lowered. The first is measured by the coefficient of transmissibility and the second by the coefficient of storage. These two characteristics are then used to determine the effect on water levels caused by changes in the location and rate of pumping from the aquifer.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Pennsylvania

View All **
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41006 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. J OS E DUA RT E- M AL DONA DO D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 08- C R
- 300- 1 B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederal P u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to re p re sen t Jose D u art eM al don ad o h as m oved forleave to w i t h draw a n d h as fi l ed a bri ef i n accor da n ce w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif

o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . D u art e- M al don ad o ha s not f i l ed a respon se. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of the rec ord an d coun sel ’ s bri ef di scl oses n o n on frivo l ou s is s u e fo r ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns i bi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

38893

Vol. 60, No. 145

Friday, July 28, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project No. 2932 Maine]

S.D. Warren Co., Notice of Intent To

File An Application for a New License

June 6, 1995.

Correction

In notice document 95–14260

appearing on page 30859 in the issue of

Monday, June 12, 1995, the project

number should appear as set forth

above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-024-05-1430-01; AZA-29177]

Notice of Realty Action; Bureau Motion

Recreation and Public Purposes

(R&PP) Act Classification; and

Termination of Existing R&PP Act

Classifications; Arizona

Correction

In notice document 95–16701

appearing on page 35420, in the issue of

Friday, July 7, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 35420, in the second column,

under the heading Gila and Salt River

Meridian, Arizona, in the land

description, under T. 3 S., R. 7 E., in the

third line, ‘‘Sec. 9, S1⁄2, NE1⁄4, W1⁄2,

SE1⁄4;’’ should read ‘‘Sec. 9, S1⁄2NE1⁄4,

W1⁄2, SE1⁄4;’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. NM–113; Special Conditions

No. 25–ANM–101]

Special Conditions: Modified Boeing

Company Model 747–100 and 747–200

Airplane; High Intensity Radiated

Fields (HIRF)

Correction

In rule document 95–17589 beginning

on page 36967 in the issue of

Wednesday, July 19, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 36968, in the first column,

under the heading DATES:, the text

should read as follows: ‘‘The effective

date of these special conditions is June

29, 1995. Comments must be received

on or before September 5, 1995.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D