alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004370EN.01006801.xml

| 17.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 370/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 370/68

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2162/2004

of 16 December 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 10 to 16 December 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           A model of geomagnetic secular variation for 1980-1983      

      January 1, 1987    

We developed an updated model of the secular variation of the main geomagnetic field during 1980 through 1983 based on annual mean values for that interval from 148 worldwide magnetic observatories. The model consists of a series of 80 spherical harmonics, up to and including those of degree and order 8. We used it to form a proposal for the 1985 revision of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF). Comparison of the new model, whose mean epoch is approximately 1982.0, with the Provisional Geomagnetic Reference Field for 1975-1980 (PGRF 1975), indicates that the moment of the centered-dipole part of the geomagnetic field is now decreasing faster than it was 5 years ago. The rate (in field units) indicated by PGRF 1975 was about -25 nT a-1, while for the new model it is -28 nT a-1. ?? 1987.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No. 19-22057-RAM 

Pacifico Sur Group, LLC, Chapter 7 (Involuntary) 

Alleged Debtor. 

________________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING JOINDER IN 

INVOLUNTARY PETITION BY CREDITOR TORRO LLC 

Petitioning Creditor Affinity Capital Funding, LLC (“Affinity”), by its undersigned 

counsel, gives notice of filing the Joinder in Involuntary Petition by Creditor Torro LLC

(the “Joinder”). Affinity files this Joinder in support of its Involuntary Petition Against 

Pacifico Sur Group, LLC [ECF 1], and any other matter that may come before this Court. 

DATED: October 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/Gary M. Freedman

Gary M. Freedman 

Florida Bar No. 727260 

gary.freedman@nelsonmullins.com 

jackie.gonzalez @nelsonmullins.com

Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel 

One Biscayne Tower 

2 South Biscayne Boulevard, 21st Floor 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: 305-373-9449 

Facsimile: 305-373-9443 

Counsel to Affinity Capital Funding, LLC

Case 19-22057-RAM Doc 27 Filed 10/18/19 Page 1 of 3
Case No. 19-22057-RAM

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on 

the 18th day of October, 2019 by electronic transmission through the Court’s CM/ECF 

system upon all parties on the CM/ECF Service List maintained by the court in this matter. 

By: /s/ Gary M. Freedman 

 Gary M. Freedman 

19-22057-RAM Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Gary M Freedman, Esq on behalf of Petitioning Creditor Affinity Capital Funding, LLC 

gary.freedman@nelsonmullins.com, jackie.gonzalez@nelsonmullins.com; 

lisa.negron@nelsonmullins.com 

James B Miller on behalf of Debtor Pacifico Sur Group, LLC 

bkcmiami@gmail.com 

Office of the US Trustee 

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

Case 19-22057-RAM Doc 27 Filed 10/18/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-22057-RAM Doc 27 Filed 10/18/19 Page 3 of 3
Chris WARNER, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, National Association; Helene Warner; and Melinda Drouin, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017

Lawrence D. Crow of Crow Law Group, P.A., Tarpon Springs, for Appellant.

Sonia Henriques McDowell of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee HSBC Bank USA, National Association.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

46887

Vol. 60, No. 174

Friday, September 8, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and

Families

RIN 0979–AB58

Title IV–B and Title IV–E of the Social

Security Act: Data Collection for Foster

Care and Adoption

Correction

In rule document 95–19679 beginning

on page 40505 in the issue of

Wednesday, August 9, 1995, make the

following correction:

Appendix A—[Corrected]

On page 40507, in the third column,

in Section I, in the second line, element

‘‘XIII.’’ should read ‘‘XII.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 95D–0131]

‘‘Point to Consider in the Manufacture

and Testing of Therapeutic Products

for Human Use Derived From

Transgenic Animals (1995);’’

Availability

Correction

In notice document 95–20964

appearing on page 44036 in the issue of

Thursday, August 24, 1995, make the

following correction:

In the third column, above the FR

Doc. line, the title line should appear as

follows:

‘‘Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent to Rule on Application

to Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Minneapolis-St. Paul International

Airport, Minneapolis, MN

Correction

In notice document 95–21531

beginning on page 45208 in the issue of

Wednesday, August 30, 1995 make the

following correction:

On page 45208, in the third column,

in the DATES section, in the second line

‘‘August 29, 1995’’ should read

‘‘September 29, 1995’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RODNEY STFLEUR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3226

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

10001378CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Materials flow in the United States—A global context, 1900–2020      

      October 31, 2022    

View Report

HTML Format

XML Format

Introduction

During the last 12 decades (1900–2020), the amounts of raw materials used in the United States have increased significantly due to economic development, technological innovations, and population growth. Data on materials are presented here to provide an overview of the annual quantities (measured in physical terms) required for the standard of living in the United States and to provide insights into the consumption trajectory that developing countries may follow. The consumption patterns driving the use of raw materials were analyzed through the lens of economic disruptions and expansions during this period, illustrating the linkages between the selected materials and economic development. These annual material inputs to the U.S. economy (excluding food or fuel) were also analyzed in a global context. The data used were gathered by various agencies and compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               National Minerals Information Center          

988 National Center12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

nmicrecordsmgt@usgs.gov

703-648-4995

### Explore Search

                  - United States

View All **
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CoConnect, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brad M. Bingham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Brad M. Bingham, Esq.


By: Brad M. Bingham, Esq.


Its: Chief Financial Officer





March 29, 2011
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           New projections of 21st century climate and hydrology for Alaska and Hawaiʻi      

      August 7, 2022    

In the United States, high-resolution, century-long, hydroclimate projection datasets have been developed for water resources planning, focusing on the contiguous United States (CONUS) domain. However, there are few statewide hydroclimate projection datasets available for Alaska and Hawaiʻi. The limited information on hydroclimatic change motivates developing hydrologic scenarios from 1950 to 2099 using climate-hydrology impact modeling chains consisting of multiple statistically downscaled climate projections as input to hydrologic model simulations for both states. We adopt an approach similar to the previous CONUS hydrologic assessments where: 1) we select the outputs from ten global climate models (GCM) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 with Representative Concentration Pathways 4.5 and 8.5; 2) we perform statistical downscaling to generate climate input data for hydrologic models (12-km grid-spacing for Alaska and 1-km for Hawaiʻi); and 3) we perform process-based hydrologic model simulations. For Alaska, we have advanced the hydrologic model configuration from CONUS by using the full water-energy balance computation, frozen soils and a simple glacier model. The simulations show that robust warming and increases in precipitation produce runoff increases for most of Alaska, with runoff reductions in the currently glacierized areas in Southeast Alaska. For Hawaiʻi, we produce the projections at high resolution (1 km) which highlight high spatial variability of climate variables across the state, and a large spread of runoff across the GCMs is driven by a large precipitation spread across the GCMs. Our new ensemble datasets assist with state-wide climate adaptation and other water planning.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jeremy Littell, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Alaska CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

jlittell@usgs.gov

907-360-9416

## Related Content

#### Jeremy Littell, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist, Alaska CASC

Climate Adaptation Science Centers

jlittell@usgs.gov

907-360-9416

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  -  Hawaii

View All **
Order entered January 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00380-CV

PRESTONWOOD TRADITION, LP; TRADITION MANAGEMENT, LLC; 

PRESTONWOOD TSL, LP; PRESTONWOOD TSL GP, LLC, ET AL.,

Appellants

V.

MARY JO JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE INDEPENDENT 

EXECUTRIX AND REPRESENTATIVE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-03747-B

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this case from submission on 

January 12, 2021. We DIRECT the Clerk to set the case for submission without 

oral argument on March 2, 2021.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      65,313,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,599,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,027
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            71,188,617
<PP&E>                                       3,026,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                 682,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,893,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,518,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       189,063
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,922,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,893,661
<SALES>                                     22,672,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,840,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             189,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,835,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,835,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,835,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Probability calculations for three-part mineral resource assessments      

      June 27, 2017    

View Report

Three-part mineral resource assessment is a methodology for predicting, in a specified geographic region, both the number of undiscovered mineral deposits and the amount of mineral resources in those deposits. These predictions are based on probability calculations that are performed with computer software that is newly implemented. Compared to the previous implementation, the new implementation includes new features for the probability calculations themselves and for checks of those calculations. The development of the new implementation lead to a new understanding of the probability calculations, namely the assumptions inherent in the probability calculations. Several assumptions strongly affect the mineral resource predictions, so it is crucial that they are checked during an assessment. The evaluation of the new implementation leads to new findings about the probability calculations,namely findings regarding the precision of the computations,the computation time, and the sensitivity of the calculation results to the input.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Karl J Ellefsen

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ellefsen@usgs.gov

303-236-7032

## Related Content

#### Karl J Ellefsen

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

ellefsen@usgs.gov

303-236-7032

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200

### Explore Search

                  - Method Development
                  - Mineral Resource Assessments
                  - Geophysics
                  - Mineral Resource Assessments
                  - Minerals
                  - Mineral resource assessments

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RE: LAZARO VALLE MOLINA CASE NUMBER:19-22760-RAM

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for December 10, 2019 hearing. All amendments and documents for the December 10, 

2019 hearing were due as of November 20, 2019. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior 

to "re-sending" documents)

PLAN @ ECF#8

Serviced 21 days prior: YES DE#15 (9/28)

If Counsel for the Debtor(s) appears and agrees on the record and confirms service of the plan: 

If objection sustained (3), Confirm Plan 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

Case 19-22760-RAM Doc 31 Filed 12/03/19 Page 1 of 1
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 22

- 00 236

- CR

NO. 09

- 22

- 00237

- CR



### ________________

ALBERT CHARLES NUGENT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 356 th District Court

Hardin County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 25,365 (c ount 1 and c ount 2 )

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an open plea, A ppellant Albert Charles Nugent pled guilty to two counts of

the second

- degree felony offense of indecency with a child by sexual contact

. See

Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (a)(1) , (d)

. The trial court assessed punishment of ten

years of confinement on each count to run concurrently

. See id. § 12.33 ( providing

punishment range for second

- degree felonies).2 Nugent’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief presenting counsel ’ s

professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is frivolous.

See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978). After Nugent’s counsel filed his brief , we granted an extension

of time for Nugent to file a pro se response

. Nugent has not filed a response.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that we need not address the merits

of issues raised in an Anders brief

. Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2005) . Rather, an appellate court may determine: (1) “that the appeal is

wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and

finds no reversible error[;]” or (2) “that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand

the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the

issues.” Id.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, a court must conduct a full examination of

the record to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio , 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988) (citing Anders , 386 U.S. at 744). We have reviewed the entire

record and counsel ’ s brief and have foun d no reversible error, and we conclude the

appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 827

– 28. Therefore, we find

it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the3 appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. A pp. 1991). We

affirm the trial court ’ s judgment s

. 1

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ W. SCOTT GOLEMON

Chief Justice

Submitted on February 22, 2023

Opinion Delivered March 8, 2023

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright , JJ.

1 Nugent may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.