alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-09-390-E 

December 24, 2009 

 Exemption No. 9980 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0834 

Mr. Donald Shipman 

6355 West Frost Drive 

Littleton, CO 80128 

Dear Mr. Shipman: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 6, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

for an exemption from § 61.213(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That 

exemption, if granted, would allow you to be eligible for a ground instructor certificate or 

rating without passing the knowledge test on the fundamentals of instructing required by 

§ 61.213(a)(3). 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to you. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 7023 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

determined that a knowledge test on the fundamentals of instructing is necessary to ensure an 

individual possesses a proven amount of instructing knowledge and qualifications. 

Furthermore, the FAA has determined that the knowledge test requirements establish 

minimum qualification standards to be met by all applicants for a ground instructor 

certificate, notwithstanding prior experience. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial 

of exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption wouldn’t be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition for an exemption from 14 CFR 61.213(b). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2214

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Myles Schwitzer

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________

Submitted: January 23, 2020

Filed: January 28, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Myles Schwitzer pleaded guilty to using a communication facility to commit 

a felony drug crime, 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), and received a within-Guidelines-range 

sentence of three years of probation. In an Anders brief, Schwitzer’s counsel 
- 2 -

identifiesthe substantive reasonableness of the sentence as an issue for us to consider 

on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

We conclude that Schwitzer’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See 

United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (stating that a withinGuidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable). The record establishes that 

the district court1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of 

judgment. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en 

banc).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 

488 U.S. 75 (1988), and conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1

The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern 

District of Iowa.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3528 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3528

  To repeal the authorization to provide office space, a furnishings 
 allowance, congressional franking privileges, and staff assistance to 
            former Speakers of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2012

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the authorization to provide office space, a furnishings 
 allowance, congressional franking privileges, and staff assistance to 
            former Speakers of the House of Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FORMER SPEAKERS.

    (a) In General.--The following provisions of law are repealed:
            (1) The first section and sections 2, 4, and 8 of House 
        Resolution 1238, Ninety-first Congress, agreed to December 22, 
        1970, as enacted into permanent law by chapter VIII of the 
        Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1971 (2 U.S.C. 31b-1(a), 31b-
        2, 31b-4, and 31b-7).
            (2) Section 5 of House Resolution 1238, Ninety-first 
        Congress, agreed to December 22, 1970, as enacted into 
        permanent law by chapter VIII of the Supplemental 
        Appropriations Act, 1971 (2 U.S.C. 31b-5).
            (3) Subsection (b) of the first section of the Act entitled 
        ``An Act relating to former Speakers of the House of 
        Representatives'', approved December 22, 1974 (2 U.S.C. 31b-
        1(b)).
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date 
        of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Staff assistance.--The amendment made by subsection 
        (a)(2) shall take effect on the day after the date on which the 
        113th Congress convenes.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2004 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carolyn V. Aver, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: June 16, 2005 |  | /S/ CAROLYN V. AVER                    
|                    |  | Carolyn V. Aver Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Agile Software Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act Filing of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Agile Software Corporation and will be retained by Agile Software Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

__________________________________ 

 ) 

In re: ) CASE NO. 14-35622-RAM 

 ) CHAPTER 13 

CLYDE RAY, JR., ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Debtor. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

ORDER SETTING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte upon the Court’s 

Notice of Requirement to File Local Form 97 “Debtor's Certificate 

of Compliance, Motion for Issuance of Discharge and Notice of 

Deadline to Object” (“Notice”) [DE# 97]. The Notice states, in 

pertinent part: 

“[t]he debtor is required to file and serve the attached 

Local Form "Debtor's Certificate of Compliance, Motion for 

Issuance of Discharge and Notice of Deadline to Object" 

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 31, 2020.

Case 14-35622-RAM Doc 100 Filed 01/31/20 Page 1 of 3
2 

on all parties of record. The trustee filed the notice of 

completion of plan payments and the debtor has failed to 

timely file the Local Form “Debtor's Certificate of 

Compliance, Motion for Issuance of Discharge and Notice 

of Deadline to Object. "NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the 

debtor must serve and file the Certificate and Motion 

within 30 days of the date of this notice or the above 

case may be closed without entry of a discharge and notice 

will be provided to all parties of record that the case 

was closed without entry of a discharge.” 

Despite service of the Notice upon Debtor’s counsel, counsel 

has failed to file the Local Form 97. The Debtor has completed the 

plan payments and it would be prejudicial to the Debtor for this 

case to be closed without the issuance of a discharge if it is the 

result of counsel’s failure to file Local Form 97. 

Therefore, it is 

 ORDERED that Debtor’s counsel of record, Carolina A. Lombardi, 

Esq., shall appear before the Court on February 11, 2020 at 

9:00_a.m., in Courtroom 4, C. Clyde Atkins U.S. Courthouse, 301 

North Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 33128, and show cause why she has 

failed to file Local Form 97. Failure to appear at the hearing or 

to file Local Form 97 prior to the hearing, may result in sanctions 

against Debtor’s counsel and shall result in this case being closed 

without a discharge without any further notice or hearing. If Local 

Form 97 is filed by the Debtor or the Debtor’s attorney prior to the 

hearing, then the Debtor’s attorney may upload an Order Discharging 

the Order to Show Cause and Cancelling the Hearing.

### 

Case 14-35622-RAM Doc 100 Filed 01/31/20 Page 2 of 3
3 

COPIES TO: 

Carolina A. Lombardi, Esq. 

Nancy K. Neidich, Trustee 

Clyde Ray, Jr. 

9526 North Miami Avenue 

Miami, FL 33150 

CLERK TO SERVE THE DEBTOR 

Case 14-35622-RAM Doc 100 Filed 01/31/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           NMR measurement of oil shale magnetic relaxation at high magnetic field      

      September 1, 2013    

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) at low field is used extensively to provide porosity andpore-size distributions in reservoir rocks. For unconventional resources, due to low porosity andpermeability of the samples, much of the signal exists at very short T2 relaxation times. Inaddition, the organic content of many shales will also produce signal at short relaxation times.Despite recent improvements in low-field technology, limitations still exist that make it difficultto account for all hydrogen-rich constituents in very tight rocks, such as shales. The short pulsesand dead times along with stronger gradients available when using high-field NMR equipmentprovides a more complete measurement of hydrogen-bearing phases due to the ability to probeshorter T2 relaxation times (<10-5 sec) than can be examined using low-field equipment. Accessto these shorter T2 times allows for confirmation of partially resolved peaks observed in low-fieldNMR data that have been attributed to solid organic phases in oil shales. High-field (300 MHz or7 T) NMR measurements of spin-spin T2 and spin-lattice T1 magnetic relaxation of raw andartificially matured oil shales have potential to provide data complementary to low field (2 MHzor 0.05T) measurements. Measurements of high-field T2 and T1-T2 correlations are presented.These data can be interpreted in terms of organic matter phases and mineral-bound water knownto be present in the shale samples, as confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, andshow distributions of hydrogen-bearing phases present in the shales that are similar to thoseobserved in low field measurements.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Justin Birdwell

##### Research Engineer and Geochemist

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jbirdwell@usgs.gov

303-236-1534

## Related Content

#### Justin Birdwell

##### Research Engineer and Geochemist

Central Energy Resources Science Center

jbirdwell@usgs.gov

303-236-1534

### Contact

####               Central Energy Resources Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBldg. 25Denver, CO80225United States
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 1 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 2 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 3 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 4 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 5 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 6 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 7 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 8 of 9
Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 43-4 Filed 05/27/20 Page 9 of 9
##### 



Exhibit 7.1
  Abbey National
    plc
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Based on IFRS
   Excluding
    Interest on retail deposits
  Year Ended December 312007


2006


2005


2004£m


£m


£m


£mProfit on continuing operations before tax


864



428



362



16Fixed Charges:Interest Expense(B)(1)


2,639



1,896



1,688



2,084

Earnings before taxes and fixed charges(A)


3,503



2,324



2,050



2,100Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges (A/B)


132.74



122.57



121.45



100.77   Including
    Interest on retail deposits
  Year Ended December 312007


2006


2005


2004£m


£m


£m


£mProfit on continuing operations before tax


864



428



362



16Fixed Charges:Interest Expense(B)(1)


5,544



4,414



4,250



4,174

Earnings before taxes and fixed charges(A)


6,408



4,842



4,612



4,190Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges (A/B)


115.58



109.70



108.52



100.38    Note:
 (1)
    
    Includes the amortisation of
    discounts and premiums on debt securities in issue and interest
    payable on finance lease obligations.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3596 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3596

    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                  available at a discount to veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2012

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                  available at a discount to veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Service Through National 
Park Access Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL LANDS PASS FOR 
              VETERANS.

    Section 805(b) of division J of the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2005 (16 U.S.C. 6804(b)), is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) Veteran discount.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                available, at a cost of $10, to any veteran who was 
                separated from military service under conditions other 
                than dishonorable, if the veteran provides proof of 
                that status by providing a copy of the Certificate of 
                Release or Discharge from Active Duty (Department of 
                Defense Form DD214) or valid military retiree 
                identification card of the veteran.
                    ``(B) Term.--A National Parks and Federal 
                Recreational Lands Pass issued under this paragraph 
                shall be valid for the lifetime of the passholder.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Putnam Valley Central School District, Petitioner, and Putnam Valley Federation of Teachers, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Dutchess County,

April 10, 1973.

*John M. Donoghue*for petitioner. *Eugene M. Kaufman*for respondent.

John P. Donohoe, J.

This petition for a judgment enjoining and restraining the respondent, the Putnam Valley Federation *375of Teachers, and the agents, servants -and employees and all persons acting in concert with them, from taking any steps to conduct an arbitration regarding the unit placement of the school nurse pending the determination of this action, is granted.

In this proceeding, the petitioner, a central school district? sues to stay arbitration of a claim by the respondent that the school nurse is an employee covered by the employment contract which was entered into by the parties which became effective on September 6, 1972. The contract is not clear on this point. It says that the respondent is the recognized bargaining representative for “ All professional personnel excluding administrative staff such as the supervising principal and junior high principal, temporary personnel and per diem personnel ”. The answer which respondent submitted concedes that ‘ *‘*Respondent did not request recognition on behalf of the school nurse during the negotiations for the current agreement. Petitioner never declined such a request since it was never made ”.

The power to determine issues of representation status of local employees was vested in the Public Employment Relations Board in sections 205 to 207 of the Civil Service Law. Section 206 authorizes local governments to establish procedures for the determination of such disputes, but says further in subdivision *2*that£ *1*In the absence of such procedures, such disputes shall be submitted to the board in accordance with section two hundred five of this article ”.

The Public Employment Relations Board was thus cloaked with exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the school nurse was covered by the agreement.
Case 19-22058-RAM Doc 1 Filed 09/10/19 Page 1 of 3
09/10/2019 19-22057-RAM

Case 19-22058-RAM Doc 1 Filed 09/10/19 Page 2 of 3
 /s/ Gary M. Freedman

09/10/2019

Case 19-22058-RAM Doc 1 Filed 09/10/19 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB of FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ginger B. Quealy, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 09, 2005


/s/ GINGER B. QUEALY
__________________________________
    Ginger B. Quealy
    President and Chief
    Executive Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY  FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1074 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-027-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date