alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Mineral commodity summaries 2022      

      January 31, 2022    

View Report

Introduction

Each mineral commodity chapter of the 2022 edition of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Mineral Commodity Summaries (MCS) includes information on events, trends, and issues for each mineral commodity as well as discussions and tabular presentations on domestic industry structure, Government programs, tariffs, 5-year salient statistics, and world production, reserves, and resources. The MCS is the earliest comprehensive source of 2021 mineral production data for the world. More than 90 individual minerals and materials are covered by 2-page synopses.

For mineral commodities for which there is a Government stockpile, detailed information concerning the stockpile status is included in the 2-page synopsis.

Abbreviations and units of measure and definitions of selected terms used in the report are in Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively. Reserves and resources information is in Appendix C, which includes “Part A—Resource and Reserve Classification for Minerals” and “Part B—Sources of Reserves Data.” A directory of USGS minerals information country specialists and their responsibilities is in Appendix D.

The USGS continually strives to improve the value of its publications to users. Constructive comments and suggestions by readers of the MCS 2022 are welcomed.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           

January 31, 2022

####                 U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Commodity Summaries 2022 Data Release              

National Minerals Information Center

## Related Content

January 31, 2022

####                 U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Commodity Summaries 2022 Data Release              

National Minerals Information Center

### Contact

####               National Minerals Information Center          

988 National Center12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

nmicrecordsmgt@usgs.gov

703-648-4995
**EXHIBIT        32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION        **

| (1) | The                  Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  By | /s/                  Steven Malone                       |   |
|--------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |     | Steven                  Malone                           |   |
|   |     | President                  & Chief Executive Officer |   |
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Probable maximum flood at Lake Chippewa near Winter, Wisconsin      

      January 1, 1976    

View Document

The probable maximum flood was computed for Lake Chippewa, Wisconsin, and routed through the lake to determine maximum lake stage. The peak discharge of the probable maximum flood at Lake Chippewa was computed to be about 75,000 cubic feet per second, primarily caused by rainfall on the lake. A secondary peak of about 41,000 cubic feet per second was due to streamflow entering Lake Chippewa. The 14-day volume of this flood was 450 ,000 acre-feet. Using an assumed operating procedure for Winter Dam, the maximum lake stage for the probable maximum flood was computed to be about 1,318 feet above mean sea level--about 3 feet below the dam crest and 6 feet above the proposed normal summer operating level. The probability of this flood occurring in any year is less than 1 in 10,000. (Woodard-USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Lake Chippewa
                  - wisconsin

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40511]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
H. R. 4761 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 61 South 

Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, California, as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LOUIS VAN IERSEL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, 

California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Louis Van Iersel Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 28, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20628]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 8772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-100215]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Rel. No. IC-20864; 812-9168]


Heritage Cash Trust, et al.; Notice of Application

January 26, 1995.

Correction

    In notice document 95-2429 beginning on page 6338 in the issue of 
Wednesday, February 1, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 6339, in the first column, in the For Further Information 
Contact section, in the first line, ``Khawley'' should read ``Khawly''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Paleoseismicity of two historically quiescent faults in Australia: Implications for fault behavior in stable continental regions      

      January 1, 2003    

Paleoseismic studies of two historically aseismic Quaternary faults in Australia confirm that cratonic faults in stable continental regions (SCR) typically have a long-term behavior characterized by episodes of activity separated by quiescent intervals of at least 10,000 and commonly 100,000 years or more. Studies of the approximately 30-km-long Roopena fault in South Australia and the approximately 30-km-long Hyden fault in Western Australia document multiple Quaternary surface-faulting events that are unevenly spaced in time. The episodic clustering of events on cratonic SCR faults may be related to temporal fluctuations of fault-zone fluid pore pressures in a volume of strained crust. The long-term slip rate on cratonic SCR faults is extremely low, so the geomorphic expression of many cratonic SCR faults is subtle, and scarps may be difficult to detect because they are poorly preserved. Both the Roopena and Hyden faults are in areas of limited or no significant seismicity; these and other faults that we have studied indicate that many potentially hazardous SCR faults cannot be recognized solely on the basis of instrumental data or historical earthquakes. Although cratonic SCR faults may appear to be nonhazardous because they have been historically aseismic, those that are favorably oriented for movement in the current stress field can and have produced unexpected damaging earthquakes. Paleoseismic studies of modern and prehistoric SCR faulting events provide the basis for understanding of the long-term behavior of these faults and ultimately contribute to better seismic-hazard assessments.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Australia
                  - south australia

View All **
Exhibit 16:  Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant





                           Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                         12221 Merit Drive, Suite 1400
                                Dallas, TX 75251


January 2, 2002


Mr. John Edward Rea
President and Director
INVVISION CAPITAL, INC.
2515 Tarpley Road, Suite 100
Carrollton, TX  75006


Dear Mr. Rea:

     This  is  to  inform  you  that  the  client-auditor  relationship  between
INVVISION  CAPITAL,  INC.  (Commission  File Number  (333-80429)  and Weaver and
Tidwell, L.L.P. has ceased.


Sincerely,

/s/ Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P.
------------------------------
WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P.



Cc:  Office of the Chief Accountant
     SECPS Letter File
     Securities and Exchange Commission
     Mail Stop 9-5
     450 Fifth Street, N.W.
     Washington, D.C.  20549
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 39076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30731]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Eficiency and Renewable Energy

10 CFR Part 430

[Docket No. EE-RM-93-801]


Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Proposed 
Rulemaking Regarding Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, 
Refrigerator-Freezers, and Freezers

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-17625 beginning on page 37388 in the 
issue of Thursday, July 20, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 430.32  [Corrected]

    On page 37415, in Sec. 430.32, in the table, in the third column, 
in the ninth entry, ``38.0'' should read ``398.0''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20223]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 9


OMB Approvals Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 1 to 51, 
revised as of July 1, 1994, in Sec. 9.1, in the Standards of 
Performance for New Stationary Sources table, the OMB control number 
for the entry ``60.703-60.705'' is corrected to read ``2060-0269''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                  19,093,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              723,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                             12,868,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        33,900,000
<PP&E>                                  34,938,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         186,742,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   28,788,000
<BONDS>                                 99,733,000
<COMMON>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              56,474,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           186,742,000
<SALES>                                318,506,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       318,506,000
<CGS>                                  196,330,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           89,352,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        11,800,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      13,513,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          8,041,000
<INCOME-TAX>                             3,428,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      4,613,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (450,000)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             4,163,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5


<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                              31,844
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    36,615
<PP&E>                                                              96,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      43,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     472,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            1,429,054
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            17,212
<OTHER-SE>                                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       472,717
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         0
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 2,171,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 106,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (2,268,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (2,268,235)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (2,268,235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                        (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (0.15)


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7756** 

AARON FRENCH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN; JOHN ROWLEY; J. LOIBEL; DAN WATSON, Lieutenant; WARNER, Lieutenant; WHETSTONE, Officer; SPIKER, Officer; RYAN, Offi cer , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv - 02299

- CCB )

Submitted : August 3, 2011 Decided: August 12, 2011

Before WILK INSON, KING , and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

. Aaron French, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opi nions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Aaron Little French, a Maryland state prisoner, brought a civil complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) against prison staff. The district court dismissed the action , finding that French faile d to exhaust his administrative remedies. French appeals the district court ’ s order s granting summary judgment and denying his motion for reconsider ation . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A prisoner must properly exhaust availabl e administrative remedies prior to filing a § 1983 action concerning prison conditions. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2006) ; Woodford v. Ngo , 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (explaining that exhaustion requires using every step available and complying with relevant proced ural requirements). French contended in the district court that he could not complete the administrative review process because prison staff did not respond to his grievances . Maryland Division of Correction Directive 185

- 002 (“DCD 185

- 002”) provides, ho wever, that a prisoner should treat

a failure to respond within thirty days as a denial and file an appeal to the next level

. Assuming, as French contended, that he received no response to his grievances, under DCD 185

- 002, and based on the dates of his i nitial grievance and the filing of the complaint in this action, he could not have completed the grievance process before he filed suit in the district court.3 Thus, the district court properly concluded that French failed to exhaust his administrative rem edies. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment but modify the dismissal to be without prejudice to French’s right to refile once exhaust ion is complete . We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discret ion by den ying French’s motion for reconsideration. See Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLC , 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing standard for review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal co ntentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Exhibit 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas K. Beplate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2004

/s/Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer
Michael ISHEE v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01033-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: May 1, 2018 Closed: July 19, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of CoConnect, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, Richard Ferguson and Dean Becker hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:  a. the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Richard Ferguson Richard Ferguson, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  April 17, 2007    /s/ Dean Becker Dean Becker, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  April 17, 2007