alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0660 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0660

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004 of 7 April 2004 amending the Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC as regards the list of divisions **

*
Official Journal L 104 , 08/04/2004 P. 0097 - 0098 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004

of 7 April 2004

amending the Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC as regards the list of divisions

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community(1), and in particular Article 2a thereof,

Having regard to the request of Belgium,

Whereas:

(1) A list of divisions within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC is laid down in the Annex to that Regulation.

(2) According to that Annex, Belgium constitutes a single division. For the purposes of Regulation No 79/65/EEC Belgium has requested to split the single division in three divisions.

(3) Regulation No 79/65/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation 79/65/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the 2004 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2059/2003 (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 1).

ANNEX

In the Annex to Regulation No 79/65/EEC, the words "BELGIUM constitutes a single division" are replaced by the following:

"BELGIUM

1. Vlaanderen

2. Bruxelles - Brussel

3. Wallonie."
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of National Realty and
      Mortgage, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of National Realty
      and Mortgage, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
      June 1, 2007





/s/
      Christopher Astrom





Christopher
      Astrom


Chief
      Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Quaternary faults of California      

      January 1, 1985    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

RON VIGDOR

XXX-XX-4069

_____________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM DE#54

DEBTOR

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this 

Court as set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A) and that a true and correct copy of the Pleading noted above was 

served, via U.S. first class mail, certified mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed on the attached 

service list this 15th day of March, 2021.

/s/ Robin R. Weiner

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

TELEPHONE: 954-382-2001

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 861154

_____________________________________

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 58 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CASE NO.: 20-12751-BKC-MAM

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

RON VIGDOR

5204 LANE PARKE COURT

MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL 35223

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

CHRISTIAN J. OLSON, ESQUIRE

C/O NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

8551 SUNRISE BLVD, SUITE 208

PLANTATION, FL 33322

CREDITOR(S)

ARIANA FAJARDO ORSHAN

US ATTY S.D. FL

500 E. BROWARD BLVD.

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33394

CORNERSTONE

POB BOX 145122

SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

ATTN: BENJAMIN G. GREENBERG, US ATTORNEY

99 NE 4TH STREET

MIAMI, FL 33132

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

C/O BETSY DEVOS, EDUCATION SECRETARY

400 MARYLAND AVE., SW

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

C/O FEDLOAN SERVICING

POB 790234

ST. LOUIS, MO 63179

WILLIAM BARR, US ATTORNEY GENERAL

US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

950 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NW

WASHINGTON, DC 20530

Case 20-12751-MAM Doc 58 Filed 03/15/21 Page 2 of 2
# L_2005039EN.01004601.xml

| 11.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/46

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 31 January 2005

appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2005/120/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Decision 2002/60/EC of 22 January 2002 appointed the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Decision 2002/60/EC of 22 January 2002 appointed the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (1).

| (2) | a seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Maria Theresia OPLADEN, notified to the Council on 29 November 2004, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

a seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Maria Theresia OPLADEN, notified to the Council on 29 November 2004,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Hans-Josef VOGEL, Bürgermeister der Stadt Arnsberg, is hereby appointed alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Ms Maria Theresia OPLADEN for the remainder of her term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2005.

For the Council

The President

J. ASSELBORN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

1

---
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 19-24331-BKC-JKO

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR.

XXX-XX-6171

_____________________________/

ORDER AUTHORIZING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE TO DISBURSE PRE-CONFIRMATION

PAYMENTS TO ADMINISTRATIVE, SECURED, AND PRIORITY CREDITORS

DEBTOR

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the February 3, 2020 Consent Calendar without opposition for 

confirmation of a proposed Chapter 13 Plan, the confirmation hearing being continued to March 2, 2020, 

and based upon the record, it is 

ORDERED:

1. To facilitate the administration of this case, any and all interim pre -confirmation payments made to 

Robin R. Weiner, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee ("Trustee") shall be non-refundable to the Debtor.

2. The Debtor is ordered to continue making payments each month to the Trustee in accordance with 

the last filed Chapter 13 Plan. Failure to continue payments may result in the dismissal of the case.

John K. Olson, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 5, 2020.

Case 19-24331-JKO Doc 43 Filed 02/05/20 Page 1 of 2
ORDER AUTHORIZING TRUSTEE TO DISBURSE PAYMENTS

CASE NO.: 19-24331-BKC-JKO

3. As a condition for the continued confirmation hearing and delay of payments to the creditors, the 

Trustee shall hold any and all interim pre-confirmation payments in trust as adequate protection 

payments for the secured creditors and in trust for the administrative and priority creditors on a 

pro-rata basis, in accordance with the last filed plan filed at least one day prior to the last 

confirmation hearing date, less all applicable Trustee's fees and costs pending confirmation, 

conversion or dismissal of the case.

4. If for any reason, the case is dismissed or converted to any other chapter in bankruptcy, the Trustee 

shall disburse in the normal course all payments held in trust on a pro-rata basis, in accordance with 

the last filed plan filed at least one day prior to the last confirmation hearing date, less all applicable 

Trustee's fees and costs.

###

ORDER SUBMITTED BY:

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

954-382-2001

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR.

561 SW 60 AVE.

PLANTATION, FL 33317

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

MICHAEL H. JOHNSON, ESQUIRE

3601 WEST COMMERICAL BLVD

SUITE 31

FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33309

ROBIN R. WEINER IS DIRECTED TO SERVE COPIES OF THIS ORDER UPON THE PARTIES 

LISTED AND FILE A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.

Case 19-24331-JKO Doc 43 Filed 02/05/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT

The Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 27, 2004, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 27, 2003, and for each of
the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 27, 2003, included in
this Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-108225 on Form S-3 of Bottling Group, LLC of our report (incorporated by
reference in the December 27, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Bottling
Group, LLC) dated January 27, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Bottling Group, LLC as of December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in
owners' equity for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
December 27, 2003 and of our report on the related financial statement schedule
dated March 10, 2004 (which report appears above). Our report on the
consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of FASB 142, "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets," as of December 30, 2001 and Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 02-16, "Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor," as of December 29, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 10, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 5, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60609

Summary Calendar

 

AYAZ SHAIKH,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A76 434 060

--------------------

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Ayaz Shaikh, a native and citizen of India,

petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’s (BIA) March 16, 2004, summary affirmance of the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) Act. We

deny review.

An alien may seek review of a final order of removal by filing

a petition with this court within 30 days following the date of the

final order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), (b)(1) (2000). The timely
2

filing of a petition for review is a jurisdictional requirement,

the absence of which deprives us of jurisdiction to review a

decision of the BIA. See Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS, 997 F.2d 108,

111-12 (5th Cir. 1993).

The evidence supports a finding that on April 12, 2004 we

received Shaikh’s petition for review of the BIA’s March 16, 2004

order. See FED. R. APP. P. 25(a)(2)(A) (filing complete when clerk

receives papers); see also Ward v. Atlantic Coats Line Railroad,

265 F.2d 75, 80-81 (5th Cir. 1959), rev’d on other grounds, 362

U.S. 396 (1960). As that filing was timely, we have jurisdiction

to consider the merits of Shaikh’s petition.

Shaikh does not explicitly challenge the BIA’s conclusion that

he is not eligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or

protection under the CAT Act. Therefore, these issues are deemed

abandoned. See Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th

Cir. 1986). Shaikh does, however, assert that the IJ erred in

finding him not credible. On appeal, Shaikh has failed to

demonstrate that the IJ’s resolution of the credibility issue is

not supported by substantial evidence and that the record compels

a credibility determination contrary to that of the IJ.

Shaikh argues on appeal that the BIA erred in denying his

motion to reopen, but he did not file a petition for review

relative to the BIA’s July 16, 2004, order denying his motion to

reopen. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to review that

decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252; Karimian-Kaklaki, 997 F.2d at 111.
3

Accordingly, Shaikh’s petition for review is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20519]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
September 11, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Subject: Clarification to Petition for Exemption,

FAA-2013-0788

Delta Engineering for Project ODA-2233-03

Title 14 CFR § 23.1359 (c), amendment 23-49

Subject: Request for immediate exemption from Title 14 CFR §23.1359(c) for the wire and cable located 

within certain metal electronic articles.

Additional Data related to request:

 FAA Advisory Circular 25-16, Section 5, Item (3) provides guidance for compliance with 25.1359 the 

predecessor to 25.869.

o (2)“Earlier wire may be used inside the fuselage of later airplanes only if its use does not create any 

significant potential for hazard....”

o (A) Enclosed in a case made of metal or other material that complies with the flammability

requirements of Amendment 25-32 that will either contain an internal fire so that it cannot 

propagate to other locations or is sufficiently airtight that internal ignition sources cannot cause a 

fire; or”

Delta Engineering believes this FAA Advisory Circular wording directly supports Delta Engineering’s 

request for exemption.

Sincerely,

John A. Moritz

Delta Engineering

13 DRBA Way

New Castle County Airport

New Castle, Delaware 19720

Phone (302) 325-9337

E Mail jamoritz@delta-engineering.com
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: July 1982      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Monitoring earthquakes across the United States      

      January 1, 1997    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10208]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 17, 2022 No. 04 - 22 - 00199 - CR , 04 - 22 - 00200 - CR , 04 - 22 - 00201 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00202 - CR Roman Dexter SOTO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 451st Jud icial District Court , Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7817 , 7818 , 7819, 7820 Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant Roman Dexter Soto has filed a motion to consolidate Appeal Nos. 04 - 22 - 00199 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00200 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00201 - CR and 04 - 022 - 00202 - CR . Based on the representations in the motion regarding similarities in the cases, this Court has determined that the appeals should be consolidated for briefing and oral argument , if grante d by the panel . We therefore GRANT the motion and ORDER the appeals consolidated for the purpose of briefing and oral argument , if any . The parties shall file all motions, briefs, and other documents as if the appeals were one case but shall include all four appeal numbers in the style. If oral argument is granted by the panel, t he appeals will be argued together, as a single appeal, and the total time limit for each side at oral argument shall equal the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The Court will dispose of all four a ppeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. Appellant’s request for an extension of time to file his appellant’s brief is GRANTED and the appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this court thirty (30) days after the date of this order.

_____________________________ ____ Liz a A. Rodriguez , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2022 .

___________________________ ________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
13758 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 14, 1995 / Notices

[FR Doc. 95–6138 Filed 3–10–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–p
Case 19-26209-EPK Doc 19 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-26209-EPK Doc 19 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-26209-EPK Doc 19 Filed 03/25/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-26209-EPK Doc 19 Filed 03/25/20 Page 4 of 4
Case 19-23230-PGH Doc 42 Filed 01/21/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 19-23230-PGH Doc 42 Filed 01/21/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 19-23230-PGH Doc 42 Filed 01/21/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 19-23230-PGH Doc 42 Filed 01/21/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 19-23230-PGH Doc 42 Filed 01/21/20 Page 5 of 5
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geologic map of the Malibu Beach 7.5' quadrangle, Southern California: A digital database      

      January 1, 1997    

This Open-File report is a digital geologic map database. This pamphlet serves to introduce and describe the digital data. There is no paper map included in the Open-File report.

This digital map database is compiled from previously published sources combined with some new mapping and modifications in nomenclature. The geologic map database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U. S. Geological Survey. For detailed descriptions of the units, their stratigraphic relations, sources of geologic mapping, and data on exploratory wells consult Yerkes and Campbell (1980), and Yerkes and Showalter (1990). More specific information about the units may be available in the original sources.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - malibu beach
                  - california

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No: 20-11252-PGH

 Chapter 7

MICHAEL SCOTT SCHAEFER

 Debtor /

DEBTOR’S MOTION TO ALLOW POST-PETITION CERTIFICATE 

OF BUDGET AND CREDIT COUNSELING COURSE

The Debtor, MICHAEL SCOTT SCHAEFER, by and through undersigned counsel, files

this Motion to Allow Post-Petition Certificate of Budget and Credit Counseling Course and in 

support thereof state the following:

1. On January 30, 2020, the Debtor filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 7 of the 

Bankruptcy Code.

2. Pursuant to directive from the Office of the Clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court 

for the Southern District of Florida, the Debtor was required to file a Certificate of Budget 

and Credit Counseling Course on or before February 13, 2020.

3. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§109(h) and 521(b) and Bankruptcy Rule 1007(b)(3), individual 

Debtors must comply with the credit counseling requirement. 

4. Upon filing the instant case, due to an inadvertent oversight, the undersigned counsel 

learned that the Certificate of Budget and Credit Counseling Course provided by the 

Debtor had expired, as it was issued on April 8, 2019 (Exhibit “A”). 

5. On February 5, 2020, the Debtor completed the required credit counseling course for a 

second time and a Certificate of Budget and Credit Counseling Course (DE #10) was filed, 

indicating that the course was completed on February 5, 2020.

6. Since the Debtor previously completed the required Budget and Credit Counseling Course 

Case 20-11252-PGH Doc 14 Filed 02/25/20 Page 1 of 2
prior to filing, albeit over six (6) months prior to the petition date, the Debtor had gained 

the benefit of the required credit counseling. 

7. The Debtor has complied with the credit counseling requirement and no party will be 

prejudiced if the Debtor is allowed to proceed with this case in the normal course. 

8. The §341 Meeting of Creditors was held on February 25, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. and Trustee 

Barmat expressed that he would be issuing a Report of No Distribution. 

9. The Debtor believes that dismissal of his case may severely jeopardize his fresh start.

10. The Debtor respectfully requests that this Honorable Court allow him to proceed with the 

instant case in order to receive his discharge. 

WHEREFORE, the Debtor respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting the 

Motion to Allow Post-Petition Certificate of Budget and Credit Counseling Course and allow the 

Certificate of Budget and Credit Counseling Course (DE #10) filed on February 5, 2020 to comply 

with the Debtor’s credit counseling requirement, and for whatever further relief this Honorable 

Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.

Respectfully submitted on this 25th day of February, 2020. 

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

330 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

(954) 765-3166

(954) 756-7103 (facsimile)

Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

By: /s/ Chad Van Horn, Esq.

Chad Van Horn, Esq.

 FL Bar 64500

Case 20-11252-PGH Doc 14 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 2