alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004351EN.01001001.xml

| 26.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 351/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 351/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2015/2004

of 25 November 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 13th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 13th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 45,400 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetizations of some Late Cretaceous glassy tuffs, volcanic breccias, and altered basalts of the Elkhorn Mountains volcanic field, Western Montana      

      January 1, 1973    

View Report

New magnetization data for Late Cretaceous glassy welded tuffs, volcanic breccias, and altered basalts from the Elkhorn Mountains volcanic field, together with geologic, mineralogic, and K-Ar data, indicate that (1) the glassy tuffs have unusually strong, uniform remanent magnetizations which are reversely polarized, much of the remanence perhaps residing in submicroscopic single-domain iron oxide particles within the glass itself, (2) breccias emplaced at minimum temperatures of about 400°C have moderately dispersed remanent magnetization directions which are normally polarized, and (3) basalts that occur within a broad area of hydrothermal alteration have remanent magnetization directions which are normally, horizontally, and reversely polarized. Present and previous studies indicate the occurrence of from two to eight complete field reversal cycles during emplacement of the volcanic field about 78 m.y. ago. Among the rocksstudied, only basalt from the Zosell mining district is important as a major aeromagnetic anomaly source.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - united states of america
                  - Elkhorn Mountains
                  - Montana

View All **
Summary of Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.30 
 SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 Effective July 1, 2011, non-employee
directors receive the following cash compensation for service on the Boards of Directors of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank and the respective Board committees: 

 

							
	 Non-Employee Board Member Compensation
	 		  			
	 Annual Retainer
	 		  	 	$  50,000	  
	 Meeting Fee
	 		  	 	1,500	  
	 Lead Independent Director Compensation
	 		  			
	 Additional Annual Retainer
	 		  	 	50,000	  
	 Non-Employee Committee Member Compensation
	 		  			
	 Meeting Fee
	 		  	 	1,500	  
	 Committee Chair Additional Annual Retainers
	 		  			
	 Audit Committee
	 		  	 	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	 		  	 	15,000	  
	 Nominating & Governance Committee
	 		  	 	10,000	  
	 Risk Committee
	 		  	 	15,000	  

 The cash compensation described above represents combined compensation for non-employee directors’ service to both
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank. Compensation is paid by the Bank and Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. reimburses the Bank for a part of the compensation paid to each director that is proportionate to the amount of time which he or
she devotes to the performance of services for the Company. A single fee is paid when the Company and the Bank hold joint board or committee meetings. The Lead Independent Director is an ex officio member of all Board committees and presides over
executive sessions of the Independent Directors of the Board but does not receive meeting fees for his attendance at committee meetings or executive sessions.
A.F., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

A.F., a juvenile, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Order from noise: Toward a social theory of geographic information      

      January 1, 2006    

In the so-called Information Age, it is surprising that the concept of information is imprecisely defined and almost taken for granted. Historic and recent geographic information science (GIScience) literature relies on two conflicting metaphors, often espoused by the same author in adjacent paragraphs. The metaphor of invariance, derived from telecommunications engineering, defines information as a thing to be transported without loss through a conduit. Another metaphor, originating in the utopian movements of the 19th century, locates information within a hierarchy of refinement-a stopping place on the path to convert mere data into higher forms of knowledge and perhaps to wisdom. Both metaphors rely on long-forgotten debates outside geography and preclude us from seeing that there are important social and ethical concerns in the relationship between geographic information technologies and society. We examine the conflicts between competing metaphors and propose a social theory of geographic information. ?? 2006 by Association of American Geographers.

## Citation Information
Case 19-20804-EPK Doc 55 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-20804-EPK Doc 55 Filed 01/13/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-20804-EPK Doc 55 Filed 01/13/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-20804-EPK Doc 55 Filed 01/13/20 Page 4 of 4
## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI<R

# E

# cEI 

# vED OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

## NOV 24 2014 

## HEARING DOCKET

IN THE MATTER OF: JAMES KEARNS Respondent. DocketNo. FAA-2014-0683 Judge J.E. Sullivan
FAA Case No. 2012S0275132
AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby files its amendment to its Complaint issued September 15, 2014, pursuant to Rule 214(b)(1) ofthe Rules ofPractice (14 C.F.R. §13.214(b)(1), and states as follows: 11. (a) Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Sections 46301(a)-(d), Respondent is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $1, 100 for each ofthe violations alleged; and (b) Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §46318(a), Respondent is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 for each ofthe violations alleged. Respectfully submitted this 19th day ofNovember 2014.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing Amendmentto Complaint has been sent this date by the following methods: original and one copy via certified mail: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, D.C. 20591
one copyvia certifiedmail and facsimile: Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 (FAX) (202) 366-7536 One copy via certified mail only: James Kearns 270 Union Street, Apt. 2 Brooklyn, NY 11231

Leg st t Office ofthe egional Counsel 

# IQH1l9 Dated
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4642** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DEVON FAUCETT, a/k/a D , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sout hern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. Thomas E. Johnston , District Judge. ( 2:07

- cr - 00153

- 1 )

Submitted : December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opini on . Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, George H. Lancaster, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney, William B. King, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Devon Faucett was convicted of violating the terms of his supervised release and was sentenced to twelve months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Faucett argues there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he violated his supervised release by constructively possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute, and that his sentence is plainly u nreasonable as a result. We affirm. We review a district court’s decision to revoke supervised release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Copley , 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). To revoke supervised release, the district court need only find a violation of a condition of release by a preponderance of the evidence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West Supp. 2011). This burden “simply requires the trier of fact to believe that the existence of a fact is more probable than its nonexistence.” United States v. Manigan , 592 F.3d 621, 631 (4th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). We review for clear error factual findings underlying the conclusion that a violation of supervised release occurred. United States v. Carothers , 337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 2003). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court neither clearly erred in finding that Faucett possessed marijuana with the intent to distribute, nor abused its discretion in revoking Faucett’s supervised release.3 Faucett also challenges his twelve

- month sentence on the sole ground that the district court improperly calculated his policy statement range based on a Grade A violation, because the court’s finding that he possesses marijuana with the intent to distrib ute was clearly erroneous. As discussed above, this claim is without merit. We therefore affirm Faucett’s sentence.
See United States v. Crudup , 461 F.3d 433, 439

– 40 (4th Cir. 2006) (stating a sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release will be affirmed if it is within the applicable statutory maximum and not plainly unreasonable )
. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 130 (Friday, July 7, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 35452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10707]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 130 / Friday, July 7, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 35452]]


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 9, 60, 260, 262, 264, 265, 270, and 271

[IL-64-2-5807; FRL-5110-8]
RIN 2060-AB94


Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities and 
Hazardous Waste Generators; Organic Air Emission Standards for tanks, 
Surface Impoundments, and Containers

Correction

    In rule document 94-29693 beginning on page 62896 in the issue of 
Tuesday, December 6, 1994, make the following correction:

    On page 62912, in the second column, in the second line, ``CESA'' 
should read ``CE2A''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit Number 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF GREAT WESTERN BANCORPORATION, INC.



|                                                  |  |                                                                               
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name                                              |  | State of Incorporation                                                        
|Great Western Bank, Omaha                         |  | Nebraska                                                                      
|                                                  | 
|Great Western Bank, Watertown                     |  | South Dakota                                                                  
|                                                  | 
|Great Western Bank, Clive                         |  | Iowa                                                                          
|                                                  | 
|Great Western Service Corporation                 |  | South Dakota                                                                  
|                                                  | 
|GWB Capital Trust I (Unconsolidated)              |  | A statutory business trust organized under the Delaware Business Trust Act    
|                                                  | 
|GWB Capital Trust II (Unconsolidated)             |  | A statutory business trust organized under the Delaware Business Trust Act    
|                                                  | 
|GWB Capital Trust III (Unconsolidated)            |  | A statutory business trust organized under the Delaware Business Trust Act    
|                                                  | 
|Great Western Statutory Trust IV (Unconsolidated) |  | A statutory business trust organized under the Connecticut Statutory Trust Act
|                                                  | 
|GWB Capital Trust V (Unconsolidated)              |  | A statutory business trust organized under the Delaware Business Trust Act    



1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First
transaction Management, Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 2007, I,
Susan Schreter, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of First
Transaction Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | such
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30,
 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | the
 information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
 months ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of First Transaction
 Management, Inc.

| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Susan
 Schreter                         
| |                                             
| | Susan
 Schreter                             
| | Chief
 Executive and Chief Financial Officer

October 25,
2007

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Multiple stressors mediate the effects of warming on leaf decomposition in a large regulated river      

      March 18, 2024    

Predicting how increasing temperatures interact with other global change drivers to influence the structure and dynamics of Earth's ecosystems is a primary challenge in ecology. Our study made use of multiple simultaneous “natural experiments” to examine how rapid warming, declining nutrients, invasive consumers, and riparian invasive species management interact to influence leaf decomposition in a large and regulated river. Specifically, we compared the breakdown of cottonwood (Populus fremontii), willow (Salix exigua), and saltcedar (Tamarix sp.) leaf litter in 2022 to a previous experiment from 1998 that occurred under much cooler water temperatures, and had higher water phosphorus concentrations, low numbers of invasive New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum), and unaltered litter chemistry from the herbivory of saltcedar leaf beetles (Diorhabda carinulata). We found that the effects of up to 10°C warmer temperatures on leaf decomposition were mediated by the establishment and management of invasive species and declining water nutrient concentrations arising from upstream reservoir lowering. Such interactions led to accelerated breakdown of saltcedar, but relatively minor effects of warming on the rate of cottonwood and willow decomposition. Additionally, our results demonstrate the potential for favorable invasive species management outcomes in the terrestrial environment to produce unintended responses in adjacent freshwater ecosystems. As temperatures continue to rise, it is critical that future studies consider how warming interacts with multiple stressors and environmental factors to influence processes such as decomposition in freshwater ecosystems.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

December 26, 2023

####                 Environmental, biological, and leaf litter decomposition data in the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam between 1998 and 2022              

Southwest Biological Science Center

#### Theodore Kennedy, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

tkennedy@usgs.gov

928-556-7374

## Related Content

December 26, 2023

####                 Environmental, biological, and leaf litter decomposition data in the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam between 1998 and 2022              

Southwest Biological Science Center

#### Theodore Kennedy, Ph.D.

##### Research Ecologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

tkennedy@usgs.gov

928-556-7374

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2004 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bryan D. Stolle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: June 16, 2005 |  | /S/ BRYAN D. STOLLE                    
|                    |  | Bryan D. Stolle Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of the Form 10-K/A or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Agile Software Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act Filing of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Agile Software Corporation and will be retained by Agile Software Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.