alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Eric S. Nadeau, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ohio Legacy Corp; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (b) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:August 15, 2005        By:  /s/ Eric S. Nadeau  Eric S. Nadeau  Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 365 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 365

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To make a technical amendment to the Education Sciences Reform Act of 
                                 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO EDUCATION SCIENCES REFORM ACT OF 
              2002.

    Section 174(e)(1)(A) of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 
(20 U.S.C. 9564(e)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ``, subject to 1 
extension of not more than 12 months, at the Secretary's discretion, 
for any contract in effect on, or entered into after, January 1, 2011'' 
after ``period''.

            Passed the Senate February 17, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 365

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To make a technical amendment to the Education Sciences Reform Act of 
                                 2002.
```
Jamel Lee BELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of mandamus is denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 327 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic in Craig, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Major William Edward Adams Department of Veterans 

Affairs Clinic’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2011 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic 

in Craig, Colorado, as the ‘‘Major William Edward 

Adams Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 TELEHEALTH CLINIC, CRAIG, COLORADO. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs telehealth clinic 

6 in Craig, Colorado, shall after the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Major Wil8 liam Edward Adams Department of Veterans Affairs Clin9 ic’’. Any reference to such clinic in any law, regulation, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 327 IS

1 map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

2 States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Major 

3 William Edward Adams Department of Veterans Affairs 

4 Clinic’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4747 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4747

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 6691 Church Street in Riverdale, Georgia, as the ``Major Gregory E. 
                     Barney Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2016

Mr. David Scott of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Tom Price of Georgia, Mr. 
   Westmoreland, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Woodall, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. 
Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, 
 Mr. Collins of Georgia, and Mr. Allen) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 6691 Church Street in Riverdale, Georgia, as the ``Major Gregory E. 
                     Barney Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR GREGORY E. BARNEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6691 Church Street in Riverdale, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Major Gregory E. Barney Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Gregory E. Barney Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3425 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3425

   To amend the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act to 
           provide a notice requirement regarding offshoring.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2012

Mrs. McCaskill introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act to 
           provide a notice requirement regarding offshoring.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Offshoring Notification Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    Section 2(a) of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification 
Act (29 U.S.C. 2101) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) the term `United States' includes each of the 50 
        States, the District of Columbia, the Republic of the Marshall 
        Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic 
        of Palau, and each territory or possession of the United 
        States.''.

SEC. 3. NOTICE.

    Section 3 of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 
(29 U.S.C. 2102(a)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as 
        subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Offshoring Information.--The notice shall contain information 
stating--
            ``(1) whether the employer plans to continue producing the 
        good or providing the service that the affected employees have 
        been producing or providing; and
            ``(2) if so, whether the production or provision will be 
        performed for the employer, by employees or contractors outside 
        the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Arthur DECARVALHO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5191

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SE Global Equities Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Partnership.

 

| Date: March 31, 2005 | /s/ Toby Chu      _______________________      Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 24.5



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Daniel A, Hamann, or Deryl F. Hamann, or either of them, attorney for me and
in my name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, to be filed or as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 with respect to the registration of the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust I and the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust II, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in
the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of August 2005,



/S/ Jeffory A. EricksonJeffory A. Erickson
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Market value of asteroidal precious metals in an age of diminishing terrestrial resources      

      January 1, 1996    

In the next century Mankind may have to choose from two options for our supply and usage of some nonrenewable natural resources, such as gold, platinum metals, and fossil fuels: learn to live with diminishing supplies of these materials obtained at ever increasing economic and environmental cost, or reach into difficult places and develop new technologies to give us what we need to sustain economic growth. Either prospect faces formidable technological and economic challenges. Exploitation of asteroids for precious and strategic metals is a possible environmentally friendly remedy for impending shortages of some resources. Certain types of asteroids could completely replace terrestrial sources of platinum metals. Asteroid metal mining may become a 21st-century space industry worth ten to fifty billion dollars annually (1995 dollars). Asteroids could make the United States and other countries self sufficient in many strategic metals, and it could usher new technologies and increase our applications of existing technologies that depend on these metals.

## Citation Information
# L_2004373EN.01000701.xml

| 21.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 373/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 373/7

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2183/2004

of 6 December 2004

extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | When it adopted Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 (2) the Council indicated that the Regulation should apply in the participating Member States as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (3). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

When it adopted Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 (2) the Council indicated that the Regulation should apply in the participating Member States as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro (3).

| (2) | However, it is important that the rules concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins should be uniform throughout the Community, and the requisite provisions should be adopted to that end, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

However, it is important that the rules concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins should be uniform throughout the Community, and the requisite provisions should be adopted to that end,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The application of Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 shall be extended to Member States other than the participating Member States as defined in Regulation (EC) No 974/98.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

H. HOOGERVORST

---

(1)  Opinion of 1 April not yet published in the Official Journal.

1

(2)  See page 1 of this Official Journal.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 139, 11.5.1998, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2596/2000 (OJ L 300, 29.11.2000, p. 2).

3

---
Akeem EMORY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-893

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 3, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           One-way coupling of an atmospheric and a hydrologic model in Colorado      

      January 1, 2006    

This paper examines the accuracy of high-resolution nested mesoscale model simulations of surface climate. The nesting capabilities of the atmospheric fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University (PSU)-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5) were used to create high-resolution, 5-yr climate simulations (from 1 October 1994 through 30 September 1999), starting with a coarse nest of 20 km for the western United States. During this 5-yr period, two finer-resolution nests (5 and 1.7 km) were run over the Yampa River basin in northwestern Colorado. Raw and bias-corrected daily precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature time series from the three MM5 nests were used as input to the U.S. Geological Survey's distributed hydrologic model [the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)] and were compared with PRMS results using measured climate station data. The distributed capabilities of PRMS were provided by partitioning the Yampa River basin into hydrologic response units (HRUs). In addition to the classic polygon method of HRU definition, HRUs for PRMS were defined based on the three MM5 nests. This resulted in 16 datasets being tested using PRMS. The input datasets were derived using measured station data and raw and bias-corrected MM5 20-, 5-, and 1.7-km output distributed to 1) polygon HRUs and 2) 20-, 5-, and 1.7-km-gridded HRUs, respectively. Each dataset was calibrated independently, using a multiobjective, stepwise automated procedure. Final results showed a general increase in the accuracy of simulated runoff with an increase in HRU resolution. In all steps of the calibration procedure, the station-based simulations of runoff showed higher accuracy than the MM5-based simulations, although the accuracy of MM5 simulations was close to station data for the high-resolution nests. Further work is warranted in identifying the causes of the biases in MM5 local climate simulations and developing methods to remove them. ?? 2006 American Meteorological Society.

## Citation Information
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 52
          - [PA-4139a; FRL-7061-2]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of Direct final rule.

# SUMMARY:

                        Due to receipt of a letter of adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule to approve revisons which establish reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for five major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) located in the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley ozone nonattainment area. In the direct final rule published on August 21, 2001 (66 FR 43779), EPA stated that if it received adverse comment by September 20, 2001, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently received adverse comments from the Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future (PennFuture). EPA will address the comments received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on August 21, 2001 (66 FR 43822). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.                    

# DATES:

The Direct final rule is withdrawn as of September 27, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Harold A. Frankford at (215) 814-2108.

# List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

        - Environmental protection
        - Air pollution control
        - Hydrocarbons
        - Incorporation by reference
        - Nitrogen dioxide
        - Reporting and recordkeeping requirements

Dated: September 14, 2001.

James W. Newson,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

Accordingly, the addition of § 52.2020(c)(173) is withdrawn as of September 27, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-23630  Filed 9-26-01; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560-50-M**

# Editorial Note:

On Thursday, September 27, 2001, this rule document FR Doc 01-23630 appeared at 66 FR 49292-49293. Due to numerous errors it is being reprinted in its entirety.

[FR Doc. R1-23630  Filed 10-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geologic map of the Moorpark 7.5' quadrangle, Southern California: A digital database      

      January 1, 1997    

This Open-File report is a digital geologic map database. This pamphlet serves to introduce and describe the digital data. There is no paper map included in the Open-File report.

This digital map database is compiled from previously published sources combined with some new mapping and modifications in nomenclature. The geologic map database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U. S. Geological Survey. For detailed descriptions of the units, their stratigraphic relations, sources of geologic mapping, and data on exploratory wells consult Yerkes and Campbell (1995), and Yerkes and Showalter (1990). More specific information about the units may be available in the original sources.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - california

View All **
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of LaBranche & Co Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M.L.LaBranche, IV, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report. 

Date: March 16, 2010 

 

****Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. **A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to LaBranche & Co Inc. and will be retained by LaBranche & Co Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**