alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 26, 2011



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Rodger L. Johnson               
|Rodger L. Johnson                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-1018

_____________________________

GERLMY JAVON TODD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

September 8, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, TANENBAUM, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
David R. PIERCE, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4936

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 134 Filed 05/27/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 134 Filed 05/27/21 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0518

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT CRAIG BRITZIUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 17 2022

03/17/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0518
Timothy Dane TILLMAN v. STATE

CR-15-1327

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

Affirmed.
Summary of Director Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.8 
 FARO Technologies, Inc. 
 Summary of Director Compensation Program

 Equity Compensation 
  

			
	 Initial Equity Grant:
	  	Upon election of the board, each non-employee director will receive shares of restricted stock with a value equal to $100,000. The number of restricted shares granted will be
determined by dividing $100,000 by the closing price of FARO common stock on the date of the non-employee director’s election to the Board. The shares of restricted stock will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the
non-employee director’s continued membership on the Board.
		
	 Annual Equity Grant:
	  	On the day following the annual meeting of shareholders, each non-employee director will receive shares of restricted stock with a value equal to $70,000. The number of
restricted shares granted will be determined by dividing $70,000 by the closing price of FARO common stock on the day following the annual meeting of shareholders. The shares of restricted stock will vest on the day prior to the following
year’s annual meeting date, subject to a director’s continued membership on the Board as of such date.

 Cash Compensation 
  

					
	 Annual Cash Retainer:
	  	$	20,000	  
		
	 Board or Committee Meeting Fee Per In-Person Meeting or Per Telephonic Meeting with a Duration of One Hour or
More:
	  	$	1,875	  
		
	 Board or Committee Meeting Fee Per Meaningful Telephonic Meeting with a Duration of One Hour or Less
	  	$	1,250	  
		
	 Additional Annual Retainers – Committee Chairpersons:
	  			
		
	 Governance and Nominating Committee
	  	$	5,000	  
		
	 Operational Audit Committee
	  	$	5,000	  
		
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
		
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	7,500	  
		
	 Additional Annual Retainer — Lead Director:
	  	$	35,000	* 
		
	 Additional Annual Retainer — Chairman:
	  	$	60,000	* 

  

	*	Payable 50% in cash and 50% in shares of restricted stock. Shares of restricted stock will be granted annually on the day following the annual meeting of shareholders,
and the number of shares to be granted will be determined by dividing the dollar value of the retainer by the closing price of FARO common stock on the date of grant. The shares of restricted stock will vest on the day prior to the following
year’s annual meeting date, subject to the Lead Director’s or Chairman’s, as applicable, continued membership on the Board as of such date. 








 Share Ownership Guidelines 
 Effective 2009, the non-employee directors are subject to minimum share ownership guidelines. Within two years after joining the Board, each non-employee director is required to own shares of the
Company’s common stock with an aggregate value of $100,000, calculated based on the closing price of such stock on the date of grant or the purchase price, as applicable. Effective 2010, each non-employee director must hold shares of the
Company’s common stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock for one year after exercise or vesting, as applicable, or until his or her retirement, whichever is earlier. 

  
 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Living with wildfire in Log Hill Mesa, Ouray County, Colorado: 2017 data report and a comparison to 2011 and 2012 data      

      January 1, 2022    

Over the last decade, a team of researchers and practitioners, referred to as the Wildfire Research Team (WiRē1 Team), has worked with wildfire practitioners seeking to create communities that are adapted to wildfire through an evidenced-based approach. The West Region Wildfire Council (WRWC) has been an integral partner amongst the WiRē Team throughout this time. Together, the WiRē Team has developed a systematic data collection and integration approach (the WiRē approach) that informs local wildfire risk education efforts and allows for monitoring of community adaptation over time. Through this approach, we collect and analyze locally relevant wildfire risk and social science data to enhance the effectiveness of local wildfire risk mitigation efforts. A unique aspect of this report is that the data collection effort was replicated. The results of the 2011/2012 data collection effort are summarized in Meldrum et. al. (2013). In this report, the results of the 2017 data collection effort are summarized first, followed by a brief comparison of the 2017 results to the 2011/2012 data. This comparison is offered to provide context to the 2017 data; in-depth investigation of change over time is beyond the scope of this report.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### James  R Meldrum, PhD

#####  Research Economist

Fort Collins Science Center

jmeldrum@usgs.gov

970-226-9176

## Related Content

#### James  R Meldrum, PhD

#####  Research Economist

Fort Collins Science Center

jmeldrum@usgs.gov

970-226-9176

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Log Hill Mesa
                  - Colorado

View All **
Mark JACKSON, Appellant, v. Paul MORAN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4981

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3269 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 423
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3269

To provide that no United States assistance may be provided to Pakistan 
                   until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2012

Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Lee, Mr. Coburn, Mrs. Hutchison, 
and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; which was read the first 
                                  time

                              June 7, 2012

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that no United States assistance may be provided to Pakistan 
                   until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN.

    No amounts may be obligated or expended to provide any direct 
United States assistance to the Government of Pakistan unless the 
President certifies to Congress that--
            (1) Dr. Shakil Afridi has been released from prison in 
        Pakistan;
            (2) any criminal charges brought against Dr. Afridi, 
        including treason, have been dropped; and
            (3) if necessary to ensure his freedom, Dr. Afridi has been 
        allowed to leave Pakistan.
                                                       Calendar No. 423

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3269

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide that no United States assistance may be provided to Pakistan 
                   until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2012

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetic properties experiments on the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit at Gusev Crater      

      August 6, 2004    

The magnetic properties experiments are designed to help identify the magnetic minerals in the dust and rocks on Mars—and to determine whether liquid water was involved in the formation and alteration of these magnetic minerals. Almost all of the dust particles suspended in the martian atmosphere must contain ferrimagnetic minerals (such as maghemite or magnetite) in an amount of ∼2% by weight. The most magnetic fraction of the dust appears darker than the average dust. Magnetite was detected in the first two rocks ground by Spirit.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Gusev Crater
                  -  Mars

View All **
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of RG America, Inc. (the
"Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, John E.
Rea, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to my knowledge and in
my capacity as an officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         report.

Date:    April 17, 2006                       /s/ John E. Rea
         --------------                       ----------------------------------
                                              John E. Rea
                                              Chief Executive Officer
Corey MCGHEE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for California.

*The following change has occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding California's EB status:*
      - California Assembly Bill 23C enacted on March 27, 2009, added a total unemployment rate (TUR) trigger to the State's EB law retroactive to February 1, 2009. As a result, California has retroactively triggered “on” to a high unemployment period for weeks of unemployment beginning February 22, 2009, and eligible unemployed workers will be able to collect up to an additional 20 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits.

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail:                         *gibbons.scott@dol.gov.*

Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2009.

Douglas F. Small,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-9746 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mapping the 3-D extent of the Northern Lobe of the Bushveld layered mafic intrusion from geophysical data      

      August 1, 2015    

Geophysical models image the 3D geometry of the mafic portion of the Bushveld Complex north of the Thabazimbi-Murchison Lineament (TML), critical for understanding the origin of the world's largest layered mafic intrusion and platinum group element deposits. The combination of the gravity and magnetic data with recent seismic, MT, borehole and rock property measurements powerfully constrains the models. The intrusion north of the TML is generally shallowly buried (generally <1500 m) with a modeled area of ∼160 km × ∼125 km. The modeled thicknesses are not well constrained but vary from ∼<1000 to >12,000 m, averaging ∼4000 m. A feeder, suggested by a large modeled thickness (>10,000 m) and funnel shape, for Lower Zone magmas could have originated near the intersection of NS and NE trending TML faults under Mokopane. The TML has been thought to be the feeder zone for the entire Bushveld Complex but the identification of local feeders and/or dikes in the TML in the models is complicated by uncertainties on the syn- and post-Bushveld deformation history. However, modeled moderately thick high density material near the intersection of faults within the central and western TML may represent feeders for parts of the Bushveld Complex if deformation was minimal. The correspondence of flat, high resistivity and density regions reflect the sill-like geometry of the Bushveld Complex without evidence for feeders north of Mokopane. Magnetotelluric models indicate that the Transvaal sedimentary basin underlies much of the Bushveld Complex north of the TML, further than previously thought and important because the degree of reaction and assimilation of the Transvaal rocks with the mafic magmas resulted in a variety of mineralization zones.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Carol A Finn, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

cfinn@usgs.gov

303-236-1345

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

## Related Content

#### Carol A Finn, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

cfinn@usgs.gov

303-236-1345

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200
### U.S. Department of the Interior Submit original plus THREE copies, OMB Control No. 1010-0141 Bureau of Safety and Environmental with ONE copy marked "Public Information." OMB Approval Expires 10/31/2014 Enforcement (BSEE) 1. PROPOSAL TO DRILL 2. BSEE OPERATOR NO. 3. OPERATOR NAME and ADDRESS NEW WELL SIDETRACK BYPASS DEEPEN (Submitting office) 4. WELL NAME (CURRENT) 5. SIDETRACK NO. (CURRENT) 6. BYPASS NO. (CURRENT) 7. PROPOSED START DATE 8. PLAN CONTROL NO. (NEW WELL ONLY) 9. API WELL NO. (CURRENT SIDETRACK / BYPASS) (12 DIGITS)
10. Revision 11. If revision, please list changes: 12. LEASE NO. 17. LEASE NO. 18. AREA NAME 14. BLOCK NO. 19. BLOCK NO. 15. LATITUDE 16. LONGITUDE 20. LATITUDE 21. LONGITUDE ( NAD 83 / NAD 27) ( NAD 83 / NAD 27) ( NAD 83 / NAD 27) ( NAD 83 / NAD 27)
22. NAME 23. TOP (MD) 24. TOP (TVD) 22. NAME 23. TOP (MD) 24. TOP (TVD)
25. LIST ALL ATTACHMENTS (Attach complete well prognosis + attachments required by 30 CFR 250.414 or 30 CFR 250.1617(c) and (d) as appropriate.)

26. CONTACT NAME 27. CONTACT TELEPHONE NO. 28. CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS 29. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (Type or print name) 30. TITLE 31. AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE 32. DATE
APPROVED: BY TITLE With Attached Conditions Without Conditions DATE API WELL NO. ASSIGNED TO THIS WELL 

## BSE E FORM BSEE-0123 (October 2011- Supersedes all previous versions of this form which may not be used.) Page 1 of 2 

# Application for Permit to Drill (APD )

WELL AT TOTAL DEPTH (PROPOSED) WELL AT SURFACE

13. AREA NAME



### LIST OF SIGNIFICANT MARKERS ANTICIPATED

THIS SPACE FOR BSEE USE ONLY

### Questions Response Remarks YES NO N/A YES NO N/A YES NO N/A YES NO N/A YES NO N/A YES NO N/A YES NO N/A 

## BSEE Form BSEE-0123 (October 2011 - Supersedes all previous versions of this form which may not be used.) Page 2 of 2 

### Application for Permit to Drill (APD) Information Sheet 33) Question Information Sheet A) Will you maintain quantities of mud and mud material (including weight materials and additives) sufficient to raise the entire system mud weight 1/2 ppg or more? B) If hydrocarbon-based drilling fluids were used, is the drilling rig outfitted for zero discharge and will zero discharge procedures be followed? C) If drilling the shallow casings strings riserless, will you maintain kill weight mud on the rig and monitor the wellbore with an ROV to ensure that it is not flowing? D) If requesting a waiver of the conductor casing, have you submitted a log to BSEE District Office that is with in 500 feet of the proposed bottom hole location for the proposed surface casing point?

G) Is the calculated daily volume possible from an uncontrolled blowout of this well greater than the daily volume included in the worst case discharge scenario in the approved oil spill response plan? E) Will the proposed operation be covered by an EPA Discharge Permit? (please provide permit number in remarks for this question) F) Will all wells in the well bay and related production equipment be shut-in when moving on to or off of an offshore platform, or from well to well on the platform? If not, please explain.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 51120 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**George Edward Ingram, Jr.,**

Defendant

— Appellant **,**

**consolidated with**

**_____________**

**No. 21**

**- 51164** 

**_____________ United States of America,** 

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**George Ingram,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No s

. 7:10

- CR

- 345

- 6, 7:21

- CR

- 177

- 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 29, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-51120 Document: 00516488836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2022No. 21

- 51120 c/w No. 21

- 51164

2 Before **Jones, Haynes,**  and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent George Ingram has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ingram has not filed a response. We h ave reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal s present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTE D**  , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL S**  **ARE DISMISSED** 

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. Case: 21-51120 Document: 00516488836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2022