alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form CGFCRD3 (4/4/2019)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 18−16248−MAM Adversary Number: 19−01298−MAM

In re:

Name of Debtor(s): Chance & Anthem, LLC

 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

Robert C Furr

Plaintiff(s)

VS.

Jeffrey M Siskind, Siskind Legal Services, Tanya Siskind, Second

Siskind Family Trust, Frank R. Zokaites, CannaMed Pharmaceuticals,

LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1732, LLC, Sovereign Gaming and

Entertainment, LLC, Florida's Association of Community Banks and

Credit Unions, Incorporated, Sympatico Equine Rescue, Inc.,

Wellington 3445, LP, Zokaites Properties, LP and Robert Gibson

Defendant(s)

 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on October 8, 2019 at 10:00 AM at the following

location:

Flagler Waterview Building

1515 N Flagler Dr Room 801 Courtroom A

West Palm Beach FL 33401

to consider the following:

Second Motion to Compel Deposition of Robert Gibson Filed by Defendants Frank Zokaites, Pro

Se, OB Real Estate Holdings 1732, LLC, Wellington 3445, LP, Zokaites Properties, LP (46)

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party

who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard

thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 9/26/19 CLERK OF COURT

By: Maria Romaguera−Serfaty

Courtroom Deputy

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 48 Filed 09/26/19 Page 1 of 1
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20411]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Vincent C. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ VINCENT C. SMITHName: Title:

Vincent C. Smith Chief Executive Officer
Letter Amendment to the Product Supply Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 



 
 Codexis Laboratories India Private Limited 

G-01, Prestige Loka 

7/1, Brunton Road 

Bangalore, 560 025 

www.codexis.com 
 April 22,
2011 
 Mr. Ajit Kamath 
 Arch
Pharmalabs Ltd. 
 H Wing, 4th Floor 
 Tex
Centre 
 Off Saki Vihar Road 

Chandivali, Mumbai – 400072 
 India

 RE: Conversion of Exclusivity for Phenylephrine, under that certain Product Supply Agreement, effective as of February 16, 2010,
between Codexis Laboratories India Private Limited (“Codexis India”) and Arch Pharmalabs Limited (“Arch”) (such agreement, the “PSA”) 
 Dear Mr. Kamath: 
 Pursuant to that certain letter regarding the conversion of the exclusive
relationship between Arch and Codexis, Inc. (“Codexis”) with respect to phenylephrine to a Non-Exclusive Relationship, effective as of April 22, 2011, between Codexis and Arch (the “Letter”), Arch is permitted to sell
phenylephrine and CDX-004, which is used in the manufacture of phenylephrine and its intermediates (collectively, the “Phenylephrine Products”) to any Third Party. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the PSA, in conjunction with
such conversion and subject to the terms and conditions of the Letter, Codexis India hereby consents to allow Arch to sell Phenylephrine Products to Third Parties and Arch hereby consents to allow Codexis India to sell Phenylephrine Products to
Third Parties. The terms of this letter agreement shall become effective as of April 22, 2011. 
 Defined terms used herein but not defined
herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Letter. If you have any questions, please contact Peter Seufer-Wasserthal by telephone (+43 7673 321 511) or email (peter.seufer@codexis.com). For clarity, nothing in this letter shall be deemed to
amend, modify, or supersede the terms agreed to in the PSA with respect to any Product other than the Phenylephrine Products. 
 Please indicate
Arch’s agreement to the above by countersigning each enclosed duplicate of this letter and return one (1) original to the following address: 
 Codexis, Inc. 
 Attn: Contracts 

200 Penobscot Drive 
 Redwood City, CA 94063 







 



 
  

			
	Best regards,
	
	Codexis Laboratories India Private Limited
		
	By:	 	/s/    Douglas Sheehy
	Name:	 	Douglas Sheehy
	Title:	 	Director


			
	
	Acknowledged, agreed and accepted by:
	
	Arch Pharmalabs, Ltd.
		
	Signature:	 	/s/    Ajit Kamath
	Print Name:	 	Ajit Kamath
	Date:	 	Chairman & Managing Director

 Bringing Life to ChemistryTM
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           New links between the Chicxulub impact structure and the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary      

      January 1, 1992    

THE 200-km-diameter Chicxulub structure1-3 in northern Yucatan, Mexico has emerged as the prime candidate for the Cretaceous/Tertiary (K/T) boundary impact crater3-6. Concentric geophysical anomalies associated with enigmatic occurrences of Upper Cretaceous breccias and andesitic rocks led Penfield and Camargo1 to suspect that this structure was a buried impact basin. More recently, the discovery of shocked quartz grains in a Chicxulub breccia3, and chemical similarities between Chicxulub rocks and K/T tektite-like glasses3-6 have been advanced as evidence that the Chicxulub structure is a K/T impact site. Here we present evidence from core samples that Chicxulub is indeed a K/T source crater, and can apparently account for all the evidence of impact distributed globally at the K/T boundary without the need for simultaneous multiple impacts or comet showers. Shocked breccia clasts found in the cores are similar to shocked lithic fragments found worldwide in the K/T boundary ejecta layer7,8. The Chicxulub melt rocks that we studied contain anomalously high levels of iridium (up to 13.5 parts per 109), also consistent with the indium-enriched K/T boundary layer9. Our best estimate of the crystallization age of these melt rocks, as determined by 40Ar/39Ar analyses, is 65.2??0.4 (1??) Myr, in good agreement with the mean plateau age of 64.98 ?? 0.05 Myr recently reported10. Furthermore, these melt rocks acquired a remanent magnetization indicating that they cooled during an episode of reversed geomagnetic polarity. The only such episode consistent with 40Ar/39Ar constraints is chron 29R, which includes the K/T boundary.

## Citation Information
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 27, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-933

Lower Tribunal No. 13-4495

________________



### Bank of America, N.A.

, Appellant,

vs.



### Daniel Scott Taccone

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Norma S.

Lindsey

, Judge.

Kahane & Associates and H. Michael Muñiz (Plantation)

, for appellant.

Dennis R. Haber

, for appellee.

Before WELLS, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Based upon Appellee’s confession of error, and our own review of the

record, we conclude that the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion

seeking to vacate the trial court’s earlier order of dismissal. We reverse and

remand the March 25, 2014 order with directions to vacate the dismissal order

entered on January 10, 2014.

2
----

----

| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of United American Corporation for the      quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of United American      Corporation. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                                                                                     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date : May      15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Benoit      Laliberté                                                                      |   |
|                     |   | Benoit      LalibertéPrincipal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |   |
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 pertaining to the Stock Option Plan, as amended, of PalWeb
Corporation and in the related Prospectus, by incorporation by reference of the
annual report on Form 10-KSB of PalWeb Corporation for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2004, of our report dated August 13, 2004. We also consent to the reference
to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the related Prospectus.


                                            MURRELL, HALL, MCINTOSH & CO., PLLP


Norman, Oklahoma
August 30, 2004
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: MARY Z. MIRIAN Case No: 19-21621-LMI

 Chapter 13

 Debtor /

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 22, 2020 a true and correct copy of the 

Debtor’s Motion For Referral to Mortgage Modification Mediation (Out of Time) (DE47) 

was transmitted electronically to:

Jennifer Laufgas on behalf of Creditor HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

ecfflsb@aldridgepite.com, jlaufgas@ecf.courtdrive.com

Nancy K. Neidich

e2c8f01@ch13miami.com, ecf2@ch13miami.com

Office of the US Trustee

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

Respectfully submitted,

LEGAL SERVICES OF GREATER 

MIAMI, INC.

By /s/ 

Florida Bar No. 241970

Attorney for Debtor

4343 W. Flagler St., Suite 100

Miami, FL 33134

Telephone/Facsimile: (305) 438-2427

Email: clombardi@legalservicesmiami.org

Alt. Email: Sfreire@legalservicesmiami.org

Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 48 Filed 03/22/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnetic fields for a 4x6 prismatic model      

      January 1, 1969    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc (Great Western) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of Great Western, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Western.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: January 30, 2006 |  | /s/     JAMES R.
CLARK 
|                       |  | James R. Clark,        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Ryan M. Tuttle, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00148

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 7th District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 007

- 0911

- 12 ). Opinion delivered by Chi ef Justice Morriss,

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the

$300.00 attorney ’ s fee award. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Ryan M. Tuttle, has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 9, 20 14

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1949
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,635,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1949
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
The Attorney General of Texas 

October 16, 1978 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

Honorable Fred P. Holub 

Matagorda County Attorney 

P. 0. Box 1527 

Bay City, Texas 77414 

Opinion No. I-I- 1258 

Re: Whether a rubber stamp 

may be used by a district clerk 

as his official seal. 

Dear Mr. Holub: 

You have requested our opinion regarding whether a rubber stamp 

engraved as directed by article 1905, V.T.C.S., may be used by a district clerk 

as his official seal to validate his acts of office. 

A very similar question was posed in Attorney General Opinion M-853 

(1971). That opinion decided that a notary public may use a rubber stamp 

engraved as directed by article 5960, V.T.C.S. That opinion stated: 

The specific directive of such statute is in regard to 

the text and form of a particular device or design to 

be enived on the instrument . . . as a seal of office. 

Nothing in this statute . . . requires the use of any 

particular material in the construction of any seal, 

notarial or otherwise. 

(Emphasis in original). 

Article 5960, the statute that describes the seal of notaries public, is 

substantially similar in wording and form to article 1905, the statute that 

describes the seal of district clerks. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the 

use of a rubber stamp engraved as described in article 1905 by a district clerk 

to authenticate his acts of office is permissible and sufficient in law to 

constitute the use of his official seal. Caution should be taken. however. to 

insure the durability and clarity of the impression. See Stooksberry v. Swan, 

21 S.W. 694 (Tex. Civ. Ape.), affirmed, 22 S.W. 963 (1893). 

SUMMARY 

A district clerk may use a properly engraved rubber 

stamp as his official seal of office. 

p. 4988 
Honorable Fred P. Holub - Page 2 (H-1258) 

/ Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

/ 

Opinion Committee 

jm 

p. 498,9
Exhibit 32

                           INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Steve Khan, Chief Executive Officer and Robert Hemmerling,
Chief Financial Officer of Investment Associates Inc., hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Investment Associates Inc. for the
     period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Investment
     Associates Inc.




Dated January 12, 2006                      /s/ Steven Khan
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven Khan,
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Dated January 12, 2006                      /s/ Robert Hemmerling
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert Hemmerling,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
PT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
King Edward DAVIS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Willie HOPKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1460

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Presidential Documents

77645

Federal Register 

Vol. 67, No. 244

Thursday, December 19, 2002

Title 3— 

The President

Presidential Determination No. 03–07 of December 11, 2002

Report to the Congress Regarding Conditions in Burma and 

U.S. Policy Toward Burma 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth under the heading ‘‘Policy toward 

Burma’’ in section 570(d) of the Fiscal Year 1997 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, as contained in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations 

Act (Public Law 104–208), a report is required every 6 months following 

enactment concerning: 

(1) progress toward democratization in Burma; 

(2) progress on improving the quality of life of the Burmese people, 

including progress on market reforms, living standards, labor standards, use of forced labor in the tourism industry, and environmental quality; and 

(3) progress made in developing a comprehensive, multilateral strategy 

to bring democracy to and improve human rights practices and the 

quality of life in Burma, including the development of a dialogue 

between the State Peace and Development Council and democratic 

opposition groups in Burma.

I understand the attached report was not forwarded due to an administrative 

error. 

You are hereby authorized and directed now to transmit the attached report 

fulfilling the above-stated requirements to the appropriate committees of 

the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the 

W

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 11, 2002. 

Billing code 4710–10–M
Case 19-18022-JKO    Doc 13    Filed 07/16/19    Page 1 of 4

Case 19-18022-JKO    Doc 13    Filed 07/16/19    Page 2 of 4

Case 19-18022-JKO    Doc 13    Filed 07/16/19    Page 3 of 4

Case 19-18022-JKO    Doc 13    Filed 07/16/19    Page 4 of 4
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 19-24100-RAM Doc 66 Filed 11/13/20 Page 7 of 7