alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thornton J. Donaldson, the Chief Executive Officer of CanWest Petroleum
Corporation (f/k/a Uranium Power Corporation) (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended October 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 13, 2005


                                        By: /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name: Thornton J. Donaldson
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20522]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

In re: GEORGE DE ARMAS Case No.: 20-11043-RAM

 Chapter 7 

 Debtor(s). 

______________________________ 

SUPPLEMENTAL FEE DISCLOSURE 

 Counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329 and 

Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, hereby files this Supplemental Fee 

Disclosure.

 1. The Debtor has requested and believes that the following services, which are not 

contemplated by the original fee agreement between the Debtor and the attorney for the Debtor, 

are reasonable and necessary: File and Prepare Notice of Conversion, Representation in 

Converted Chapter 7 Case and File Prepare and Serve Amended Schedules.

2. For these services, counsel for the Debtor(s), Kingcade & Garcia, P.A., has 

received a fee of $1,400.00 and costs of $100.00. Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has not agreed to 

share the above – disclosed compensation with person(s) who are not members or associates of 

Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent, via 

CM/ECF, on March ___, 2020, to the Assistant United States Trustee, 51 SW 1 Avenue, Suite 

1204, Miami, FL 33130. 

 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 9011-4(B) 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I 

am admitted to the Bar of the United 

States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am 

in compliance with the additional 

qualifications to practice in this 

Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-

1(A). 

KINGCADE & GARCIA, P.A 

Counsel for the Debtor 

Kingcade Building 

1370 Coral Way ▪ Miami, Florida 33145-2960 WWW.MIAMIBANKRUPTCY.COM

Telephone: 305-285-9100 

__/s/_Timothy S. Kingcade

x Timothy S. Kingcade, Esq., FBN 082309 

□ Wendy Garcia, Esq., FBN 0865478 

□ Jessica L. McMaken, Esq., FBN 580163

Case 20-11043-RAM Doc 36 Filed 03/09/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,450-03

EX PARTE JOHNNY RAY ADKINS, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W01-49554-U(B) IN THE 291 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Adkins v. State, No. 05-02-00680-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas June 3,2003).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

advise Applicant of his right to testify at the guilt phase of trial and discuss the pros and cons of

testifying at that time. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 21, 2019

Do not publish
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           The reintroduction landscape: Finding success at the intersection of ecological, social, and institutional dimensions      

      August 31, 2016    

No abstract available. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jason B Dunham

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

jdunham@usgs.gov

541-750-0990

## Related Content

#### Jason B Dunham

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

jdunham@usgs.gov

541-750-0990

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States
S% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION
IX 75Hawthorne Street San Francisco,CA94105 April 30, 2008 Mr. Eldon Heaston, Executive Officer Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 14306 Park Avenue Victorville, CA 92392-2310 Dear Mr. Heaston: Thank youfor your timely submission
of the 2007 Annual Monitoring Network Plan, June 28, 2007. We recognize that producing this document and the associated public inspection process represented new requirements and we appreciate youreffort to meetthem. We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that it meetsthe minimum requirements

setforth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. If youhave any questions regarding this letter, please feel free tocontactmeat CD(415)972-3261.

Sincere

, Sean P. Hogan, Manager Air Quality Analysis Office Air Division cc: Christopher

A. Collins, MDAQMD Larry Parks, MDAQMD 0
CGFD43 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 7, 2021

A. Jay Cristol

United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−26046−AJC

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Gerardo Arias

1601 NE 176 St

Miami, FL 33162

SSN: xxx−xx−2836

ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION AND DISMISSING CHAPTER 13 CASE

 This case came before the court for confirmation of a proposed chapter 13 plan. Based on the record,

it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Confirmation of the proposed chapter 13 plan is denied.

2. This case is dismissed.

Page 1 of 2

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 169 Filed 05/07/21 Page 1 of 2
3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

4. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

5. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United

States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the

balance of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the

trustee shall be applied to this balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in

accordance with the Bankruptcy Code, and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered

by the court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all

unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

6. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with

the requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

7. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept for

filing any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior order

of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments

and filing fees remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 19-26046-AJC Doc 169 Filed 05/07/21 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF J. TERRY MEDOVITCH

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, J. Terry Medovitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                /s/ J. Terry Medovitch
                                -------------------------
                                J. Terry Medovitch
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                May 11, 2006

                                      -16-
James WINSTON v. STATE

CR-15-0760

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20511]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
ERNST & YOUNG (LOGO)

Ernst & Young LLP
Sears Tower
233 South Wacker Dive
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6801
Phone: 312-879-20001

Report on Management's Assertion on Compliance
with Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Board of Directors
Dovenmuehle Mortgage. Inc.

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of  Management, that Dovenmuehle Mortgage,  Inc. (DMI) complied
with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) during the year ended December 31, 1999. Management is responsible for
DMI's compliance with  those  requirements.  Our responsibility  is to  express
an  opinion  on management's assertions about DMI's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants  and,  accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about DMI's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on DMI's
compliance with specified requirements.

In  our  opinion,   management's   assertion,   that  DMI   complied   with  the
aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1999, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

This  report is  intended  solely  for the  information  and use of the board of
directors,  management, Federal Home Loan Mortage Corporation,  Federal National
Mortgage  Association,  Government  National  Mortgage  Association,  and  DMI's
private  investors  and is not  intended  to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.


Ernst & Young LLP
March 10, 2000


Ernst & Young is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB of FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerald W. Quealy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 09, 2005


/s/ GERALD W. QUEALY
__________________________________
    Gerald W. Quealy
    Treasurer and Chief
    Financial Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY  FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 3.3



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

AMERICASDOCTOR, INC.





---



Pursuant to Section 242

of the General Corporation Law

of the State of
Delaware



AmericasDoctor, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the Corporation), hereby certifies as follows:



FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Corporations Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation:



Article First of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:



FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Essential Group, Inc.



SECOND: That the stockholders of the Corporation have approved such amendment by means of written action of stockholders in
lieu of a meeting in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



THIRD: That such amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AmericasDoctor, Inc. has caused this
Certificate to be duly executed by its President and attested to by its Secretary this 24th day of March, 2004.



AMERICASDOCTOR, INC.By:

/s/ C. Lee JonesC. Lee Jones President and Chief Executive Officer




ATTEST:

|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|                      
|/s/ Dennis N. Cavender

Dennis N. Cavender

Secretary
# L_2004365EN.01002301.xml

| 10.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 365/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 365/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2106/2004

of 9 December 2004

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 3 to 9 December 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be 30,25 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
Exhibit 10.1







AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”),
effective as of March 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), hereby amends the Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2010, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated November 3, 2010 (the “Agreement”), by and between AmTrust
Financial Services, Inc., 59 Maiden Lane, 6th floor, New York, New York, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
and Michael J. Saxon, an individual residing at 514 Brookstone Court, Copley, OH 44321 (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the purpose of this Amendment
is for the Executive and the Company to agree to an extension of the Employment Period to February 28, 2015.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree
as follows:


 


	Section 2 (Employment Period) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 2 in its entirety
and replacing it with the following:

 


2.Employment Period. For a period commencing
on the Effective Date hereof and ending on February 28, 2015 (the “Employment Period”), the Company hereby employs
Executive in the capacities herein set forth. Executive agrees, pursuant to the terms hereof, to serve in such capacities for the
Employment Period. This Agreement shall renew for successive three-year periods (“Successive Employment Periods”) unless
one of the parties provides written notice to the other more than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the Employment Period or
any Successive Employment Period that the party will not renew the Agreement. The Employment Period and any Successive Employment
Period(s) shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Employment Period.”


 


	All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with their terms.

 


 


AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


 


 





	By: /s/ Stephen Ungar	 	 	Date: March 1, 2012
	Name: Stephen Ungar	 	 	 
	Title:General Counsel and Secretary	 	 	 







  


 


EXECUTIVE  


 





	/s/ Michael J. Saxon	 	 	Date: February 24, 2012
	Michael J. Saxon