alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.10

 

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at February 29, 2012

 

This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to base compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) and each of:

 

·                  the Company’s principal executive officer (Mary G. Puma),

 

·                  the Company’s principal financial officer (Jay Zager), and

 

·                  the three most highly compensated other executive officers serving as executive officers at December 31, 2011.

 

These executive officers are referred to herein as “named executive officers” or “NEOs.”

 

Other than in the case of Mary G. Puma, the Company has not entered into any written agreements with its named executive officers addressing the amount of base salary due to the executive. The Company’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ms. Puma (“Puma Employment Agreement”) is listed as Exhibit 10.11 to this Form 10-K (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 8, 2007).

 

The Company maintains that all executive officers, other than Ms. Puma, are employees at will and that the Company has no obligation to continue their employment, other in cases where such obligation arises under the Change of Control Agreements described in our Proxy Statement and filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K.

 

In the course of the employment relationship with each NEO, the Company communicates to the named executive officer the amount of base salary approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which compensation is subject to change in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The following table sets forth the annual base salary as communicated to the named executive officers of the Company as in effect on February 29, 2012:

 

	
Named Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
Title
    	
 
    	
Base Salary
    	
 
    
	
Mary G. Puma 
    	
 
    	
President   and Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
550,000
    	
 
    
	
Jay Zager 
    	
 
    	
Executive   VP and Chief Financial Officer
    	
 
    	
$
    	
350,000
    	
 
    
	
Kevin Brewer 
    	
 
    	
Executive   VP, Operations
    	
 
    	
$
    	
330,000
    	
 
    
	
Lynnette C. Fallon 
    	
 
    	
Executive VP HR/Legal and General Counsel
    	
 
    	
$
    	
320,000
32.2     Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of National Realty and
         Mortgage, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
         2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Genesis Capital
Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Financial Officer of
National Realty and Mortgage, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 14, 2006

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended February 28,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                  1,820
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              19
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,839
<PP&E>                                 12,100
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         13,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     184
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             13,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           13,946
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,570
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,261
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                            2.49
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11452 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES CHARLES HOWELL, also known as Jay Howell, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-473-1

-------------------- June 20, 2002 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * James Charles Howell appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5845(a), 5861(d), and 5871. The Government argues that Howell knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence as part of his plea agreement. Howell argues that the waiver provision does not bar this appeal because it allows him to appeal an upward departure. He argues that he is challenging the district court’s impositionNo. 01-11452 -2- of a partly consecutive sentence which was the functional equivalent of an upward departure. Howell has not shown that the sentence imposed by the district court was the result of an upward departure. The district court sentenced Howell to 51 months, a sentence within the applicable guideline range of 41 to 51 months. The district court explained that it was imposing a partly consecutive sentence because the state felony offense was only partly taken into consideration in calculating the applicable guideline range for the firearm offense. If the district court had fully considered the state narcotics offense by applying U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(c) in calculating Howell’s offense level, Howell would have faced a guideline sentencing range of 78 to 97 months of imprisonment. Because the district court did not fully take the state narcotics offense into consideration, U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c) applied to the calculation of Howell’s sentence. Section 5G1.3(c) authorized the district court to impose a sentence “to run concurrently, partially concurrently, or consecutively to the prior undischarged term of imprisonment to achieve a reasonable punishment for the instant offense.” Therefore, Howell’s sentence was not the result of an upward departure from the applicable guideline range. Because the district court did not depart upward, the waiver-of-appeal provision in the plea agreement is applicable. The record indicates that Howell knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his sentence. See United States v. Henderson , 72 F.3d 463, 464-65 (5th Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Melancon ,No. 01-11452 -3- 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992). Therefore, Howell may not appeal his sentence, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
Order entered May 22, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00548 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF S .V., A C HILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 04 - 11968 - V



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s May 17, 2019 motion to accelerate this appeal. We DENY the motion.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Real-time kinematic surveying at the Osage-Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research sites, Osage County, Oklahoma      

      January 1, 2002    

Highly accurate survey-grade Global Positioning System (GPS) technology was used at the two Osage-Skiatook petroleum environmental research sites to document the locations of observation wells, geoprobe holes, and other sampling sites of 15 research scientists. Real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS was the method used, because it is stable, fast, and accurate.

Initially three survey monuments were installed one at each research site and one at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers headquarters for Skiatook Lake. The monument locations were established by static GPS surveys that occupied each of the sites for four hours. The data were submitted to the NOAA-National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) for processing. OPUS processes the data relative to three sites on the NGS continuously operating reference station network (CORS). CORS provides GPS carrier phase and code range measurements in support of three-dimensional positioning activities throughout the United States. OPUS enables positioning accuracies, both horizontally and vertically, that approach a few centimeters relative to the National Spatial Reference System and electronically mails the results to the sender. The usual turnaround time for a data set is 2-3 minutes, depending upon the file size. Static GPS surveys are highly accurate, but require post processing the data and longer occupation time.

The RTK surveys require a GPS base station positioned over a known monument, a GPS rover, and a radio link between the base station and the rover. The radio link transmits the base station correction data to the rover. The rover combines the base station data with the rover GPS data to produce real-time coordinates. The rover must maintain lock on at least four of the same satellites that the base station is tracking. Each survey location is occupied for 3 minutes. Setup time at each location is less than a minute, if the rover maintains lock on the satellites and the radio link to the base station.

Accuracy in the horizontal component is 1 centimeter (cm) plus 2 parts per million (ppm) times the baseline distance and in the vertical component is 2 cm plus 2 ppm times the baseline distance. The calculated accuracy for the initial static GPS surveys that occupied the survey monuments ranged from 1.2 to 1.4 cm for the horizontal component and 2.2 to 2.4 cm for the vertical component. Calculated accuracy for the RTK surveys at the research sites are about 2.2 to 2.4 cm for the horizontal component and 4.2 to 4.4 cm for the vertical component.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Oklahoma

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO: 19-20021-BKC-RAM

JAVIER DE JESUS ZUNIGA

ZAYDA ZUNIGA,

 DEBTOR(S).

 /

ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO MODIFY PLAN AND DISMISSING CHAPTER 

13 CASE

THIS CASE came on to be heard on November 9, 2021, for Debtor(s) 

Motion to Modify Plan (ECF #116), and based on the record, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion to Modify Plan is denied without prejudice.

2. This case is hereby dismissed from the date hereof as debtor(s) 

did not file a new modified plan by the deadline given of Friday, 

November 12, 2021.

3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

4. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the 

administrative closing of the case.

Robert A. Mark, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 30, 2021.

Case 19-20021-RAM Doc 120 Filed 12/01/21 Page 1 of 2
5. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the 

Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse, 301 

North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the balance 

of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017-2(E). Any funds 

remaining with the trustee shall be applied to this balance and the 

trustee must dispose of any funds in accordance with the Bankruptcy 

Code, and Local Rule 1017-2(F), unless otherwise ordered by the 

court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration 

of this order unless all unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion 

is filed.

6. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed 

case must be filed in accordance with the requirements of Local Rule 

9013-1(E).

7. In accordance with Local Rule 1002-1(B), the clerk of court 

is directed to refuse to accept for filing any future voluntary 

petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior 

order of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application 

to Pay Filing Fee in Installments and filing fees remain due from 

any previous case filed by the debtor.

###

PREPARED BY:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

PATRICK L. CORDERO, ESQUIRE is directed to serve a copy of this Order 

on interested parties who do not receive service by CM/ECF, and file 

a proof of such service within two (2) business days from entry of 

the Order.

Case 19-20021-RAM Doc 120 Filed 12/01/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 33204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30627]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit A

Exhibit A to the Goodstein Complaint

Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 1 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 2 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 3 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 4 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 5 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 6 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 7 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 8 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 9 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 10 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 11 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 12 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 13 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 14 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 15 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 16 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 17 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 18 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 19 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 20 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 21 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 22 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 23 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 24 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 25 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 26 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 27 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 28 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 29 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 30 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 31 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 32 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 33 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 34 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 35 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 36 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 37 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 38 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 39 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 40 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 41 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 42 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 43 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 44 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 45 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 46 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 47 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 48 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 49 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 50 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 51 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 52 of 53
Case 20-01028-AJC Doc 1-1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 53 of 53
LF-70 (rev. 12/01/09)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Fort Lauderdale Division

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: PAMELLA B. WATSON, Case No. 19-20814-JKO

Chapter 13

Debtor 

______________________________/

OBJECTION TO CLAIM ON SHORTENED NOTICE

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CREDITOR: THIS IS AN OBJECTION 

TO YOUR CLAIM

This objection seeks either to disallow or reduce the amount or change the priority 

status of the claim filed by you or on your behalf. Please read this objection carefully to 

identify which claim is objected to and what disposition of your claim is recommended. Upon 

the filing of this objection an expedited hearing on this objection will be scheduled on the 

date already scheduled for the confirmation hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3007-

1(B)(2).

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3007 and Local Rule 3007-1(B)(2), the debtor objects to the 

following claim filed in this case:

CLAIM NO, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY – INTERNAL REVENUE 

SERVICE. Debtor is in the process of preparing and filing her returns for tax years 

2016, 2017 and 2018, and has estimated that there will be no tax liability for those 

tax years, therefore, the priority tax claim should be stricken and disallowed. 

The undersigned acknowledges that this objection and the notice of hearing for this objection will be 

served on the claimant and the debtor at least 14 days prior to the confirmation hearing date and 

that a certificate of service conforming to Local Rule 2002-1(F) must be filed with the court when the 

objection and notice of hearing are served.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualification to practice in this 

court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). 

Dated: January 29, 2020

MARY JO RIVERO, P.A.

Attorneys for Debtor(s)

1806 N. Flamingo Road, Ste. 355

Pembroke Pines, FL 33028

(954) 704-9332

ecf@maryjorivero.com

By: /s/ Mary Jo Rivero 

Mary Jo Rivero

Fla. Bar No. 745870

Case 19-20814-PGH Doc 63 Filed 01/29/20 Page 1 of 1
Devaris Cornez BROWNING v. STATE

CR-15-1400

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2004328EN.01006501.xml

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/65

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1897/2004

of 29 October 2004

supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 as regards the entry of a name in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’ (Cartoceto) (PDO)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 6(3) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, the application submitted by Italy for registration of the name ‘Cartoceto’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, the application submitted by Italy for registration of the name ‘Cartoceto’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | Since no statement of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 has been sent to the Commission, the name should be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since no statement of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 has been sent to the Commission, the name should be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name listed in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p.1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 21).

1

(2)  
  OJ C 41, 17.2.2004, p. 2 (Cartoceto).

2

Cartoceto

---

ANNEX

PRODUCTS LISTED IN ANNEX I TO THE TREATY, INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

Fats and oils (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

ITALY

Cartoceto (PDO)

---