alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Myroon Laltoo, on Behalf of Herself and Her Three Infant Children, Petitioner, *v.*James M. Shuart, as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

May 24, 1973.

*Leonard 8. Clark*and *Emanuel Caiati*for petitioner. *Joseph J aspan, County Attorney,*for respondent.

Daniel G-. Albert, J.

Petitioner in this article 78 proceeding is granted judgment in all respects. The court conducted a hearing in this matter on May 22, 1973, and has concluded that petitioner fled here from the United States Virgin Islands in fear of bodily harm to her and her children; that she is ready, willing and able to seek and gain employment as soon as she is settled here; and that the respondent has arbitrarily denied petitioner the public assistance which would otherwise be due a *“*resident ” of this county. While in the opinion of the court the imposition of a reasonable residency requirement as a condition precedent to the obtaining of public assistance is a legitimate governmental function within the province of Congress or a State Legislature (see dissenting opn. of Mr. Chief Justice Warren in *Shapiro*v. *Thompson,*394 U. S. 618, 644), I am constrained by the United States Supreme Court recent decisions to hold that any such residency requirement is unconstitutional. (See *Shapiro*v. *Thompson, supra; Graham*v. *Richardson,*403 U. S. 365.) Moreover, the eligibility *309regulations promulgated by the Department of Social Services clearly indicate that, insofar as residency of an applicant is concerned, the applicant need only be “residing *or found*within the public welfare district on the date of application and subsequent thereto.” (18 NYCRR 351.2 [e] [1].) (Emphasis added.) This conforms to the Federal decisions above cited.

No one can reasonably claim that such a rule authorizes an applicant to lawfully obtain duplicate grants from other districts since he need not be a resident thereof. The inherent fraud of such a scheme is manifest. Nor can it be reasonably argued that petitioner must exhaust her administrative remedies before seeking court relief. This is an emergency situation, and under such circumstances irreparable harm might befall petitioner by prolonging the administrative and court procedures herein. *(Young*v. *Shuart,*67 Misc 2d 689, affd. 39 A D 2d 724; *Matter of Borders*v. *Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs.,*34 A D 2d 805, 806.)

Under all these circumstances, and in light of the hearing conducted by this court, judgment is granted to petitioner and the respondent is directed to process petitioner’s application for public assistance forthwith without regard to the duration of her residency or location here in Nassau County.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Opportunity Mars Rover mission: Overview and selected results from Purgatory ripple to traverses to Endeavour crater      

      January 1, 2011    

Opportunity has been traversing the Meridiani plains since 25 January 2004 (sol 1), acquiring numerous observations of the atmosphere, soils, and rocks. This paper provides an overview of key discoveries between sols 511 and 2300, complementing earlier papers covering results from the initial phases of the mission. Key new results include (1) atmospheric argon measurements that demonstrate the importance of atmospheric transport to and from the winter carbon dioxide polar ice caps; (2) observations showing that aeolian ripples covering the plains were generated by easterly winds during an epoch with enhanced Hadley cell circulation; (3) the discovery and characterization of cobbles and boulders that include iron and stony-iron meteorites and Martian impact ejecta; (4) measurements of wall rock strata within Erebus and Victoria craters that provide compelling evidence of formation by aeolian sand deposition, with local reworking within ephemeral lakes; (5) determination that the stratigraphy exposed in the walls of Victoria and Endurance craters show an enrichment of chlorine and depletion of magnesium and sulfur with increasing depth. This result implies that regional-scale aqueous alteration took place before formation of these craters. Most recently, Opportunity has been traversing toward the ancient Endeavour crater. Orbital data show that clay minerals are exposed on its rim. Hydrated sulfate minerals are exposed in plains rocks adjacent to the rim, unlike the surfaces of plains outcrops observed thus far by Opportunity. With continued mechanical health, Opportunity will reach terrains on and around Endeavour's rim that will be markedly different from anything examined to date.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
Isiah EL-AMIN, et al., Appellants, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 3D17-862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2520

LYDIA PERALTA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.

(CA-94-3298-HAR)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lydia Peralta, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph Gutman, Vincent

Michael Wills, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A.,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

summary judgment in the Appellee's favor on her claims of national

origin discrimination and retaliatory discharge in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Peralta v. Levindale Hebrew Geriatric Center and Hospital,

No. CA-94-3298-HAR (D. Md. Aug. 1, 1995). We deny Appellant's

motion for sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASE NO.: 19-18996-AJC

Maria M Vallejo CHAPTER 13

 

 DEBTOR /

EMERGENCY MOTION TO REINSTATE CHAPTER 13 CASE

COMES NOW, Maria M Vallejo (the “Debtor’) by and through the undersigned 

counsel and moves for an Order Reinstating Chapter 13 Case and pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

§362(c)(2)(b), under Rule 59 and 9023 as reasons thereof states as follows:

1. The Debtors filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the United States

Bankruptcy Code on July 5, 2019.

2. On March 23, 2020, the Court entered and Order Granting Trustee's Request for Order 

Dismissing Case Upon Denial of Confirmation of Plan (Re: # 68 ) [DE 72].

3. The Debtor would like the opportunity to reinstate her Chapter 13 Case in order save her

homestead and investment property via cure and maintain.

4. Undersigned has complied with the Trustee’s deficiency notice prior to the dismissal.

5. The Debtor has requested that this motion be heard on an emergency calendar as there is 

is resumed activity as of April 7, 2020 under state case court number 2016-029854-CA05.

6. Due to the Covid19, the debtor was out of the country and was unable to reinstate timely.

7. The Debtor seeks this motion in good faith and not for the purpose of any delay.

CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS

COMES NOW the Attorney for the Debtor, Maria M Vallejo and files this 

Certification of Funds Notice in this bankruptcy cause and states: 

Pursuant to Local Rule 9013-1(E), the undersigned attorney is holding $0.00

WHEREFORE, the Debtor requests this Court enter an order reopening his Chapter 13 

case and any other relief this Court deems just and proper.

Case 19-18996-AJC Doc 76 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY, that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was served 

this 13

h

day of April 2020 to all parties eligible to receive electronic notices and all parties on 

the attached matrix. 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District 

of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this Court set 

forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A)

MARRERO, CHAMIZO, MARCER LAW L.P.

Attorneys for Debtors

3850 Bird Road, Penthouse 1 

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: (786) 431-2770

Fax: (305)444-5538

E-mail:bankruptcy@MareroLawFirm.com

By: /s/ Julio C. Marrero, Esq.

 FBN: 784664

Case 19-18996-AJC Doc 76 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


         I, Edward T. Whelan, Chief Executive Officer of Military Resale Group,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                              By: /s/ Edward T. Whelan
                              ------------------------------
                              Name: Edward T. Whelan Title: Chief
                              Executive Officer




June 17, 2003

-------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Military Resale Group, Inc. and will be retained by Military Resale
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       16






<PAGE>
ESURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. E.L.S.R. CORP., etc., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1365

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

Methe & Rothell, P.A., and Kristi Bergemann Rothell (West Palm Beach), for appellant.

Eaton & Wolk, PL, and William G. Wolk ; Eaton; Carlos Santisteban, Jr., P.A., and Carlos Santisteban, Jr., for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2011 - 1454 Directorate I D : 2011 - SW - 054 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model A109S and AW109SP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 14 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : This proposed AD is intended to detect a crack, which could lead to a failure of the elevator and reduced maneuverability of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 19,921 Labor per Helicopter ( 3 x $ 8 5 /work - hour) ( 10 x $8 5 /work - hour) $ 255 (per inspection cycle) $850 (replacement) Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 20,771 Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Jim Grigg
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATIONS  CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Dr.
Philip Nolan of eircom Group plc (registrant),
and eircom Funding, Valentia
Telecommunications and eircom  Limited (additional registrants), certify that:  1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of eircom
Group plc (registrant), and eircom Funding,
Valentia Telecommunications and eircom Limited
(additional registrants);  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the companies as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The
companies other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the companies and have:  (a)Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the companies, including their consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated
the effectiveness of the companies disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed
in this report any change in the companies internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
companies internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The
companies other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companies auditors and the audit committee of the companies boards of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companies ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companies internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
  23/7/04By:Dr. Philip Nolan
  Chief Executive
  eircom
  Group plc
Exh. 10.24 Assing Letter Agreement












Exhibit 10.24





Tesco Corporation
3993 W. Sam Houston Parkway N., Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77043-1211 USA


Julio_Quintana@tescocorp.com
(713) 359-7101


Julio M. Quintana
President and Chief Executive Officer




Fernando R. Assing




Re: Promotion to Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer


Dear Fernando:


We are pleased to offer you the following promotion as approved by resolution of the Board of Directors at its August 10, 2011 meeting. Your new position is Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. In that role, you report directly to me, Julio M. Quintana, President and Chief Executive Officer. The effective start date of this promotion shall be July 15, 2011.


Compensation


		
	•
	Annual Base Salary - $325,000


		
	•
	2011 Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) - Target Award of 70% of Annual Base Salary and a Maximum Target of 140% of Annual Base Salary




Employment Agreement


This Letter Agreement, as of July 15, 2011, amends your existing employment agreement to reflect these changes to your position and compensation. All other terms and conditions of your existing employment agreement remain unchanged and in full effect. 


To accept this offer, please sign and return in confidence to Guy Bennett, Vice President, Human Resources of Tesco Corporation (US).






Sincerely,                        Employee


/s/ Julio M. Quintana                    /s/ Fernando R. Assing                
Julio M. Quintana                    Fernando R. Assing
President and Chief Executive Officer            Date: February 23, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James J. Ackerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                      
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/   JAMES J. ACKERMAN
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | James J. Ackerman      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer

Dated:August 14,
2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to OpenTV Corp. and will be retained by OpenTV Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.3**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, George M.L. LaBranche, IV, Chairman, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of LaBranche & Co Inc., hereby certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewedthis Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaBranche & CoInc.;

 

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.

 

 

**Date:  April 15,2005**

** **
| ** **                                    | **/s/ George M.L.  LaBranche, IV** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|
| **Name: George M.L.  LaBranche, IV**          |
| **Title: Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer** |
| **and President**                             |

** **

----
Blake COFIELD v. STATE

CR-15-0932

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Craig WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4305

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 7, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.1

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
              AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                                 KNOLOGY, INC.

     Knology, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), does
hereby certify as follows:

     FIRST: That in accordance with the requirements of Section 141 and 242 of
the DGCL, the Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting at a meeting duly
called and convened on May 16, 2001, duly adopted resolutions: (1) proposing and
declaring advisable the amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation to change the definition of "Second Closing
Deadline" in Section 4.4.5 of the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation and (2) recommending that such amendment be
submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their consideration and
approval by written consent.

     SECOND: That the amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation is as follows:

     The definition of "Second Closing Deadline" in Section 4.4.5 of the Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby deleted in it is entirety
and replaced with the following:

          "Second Closing Deadline" means June 30, 2001.
           -----------------------

     THIRD: That thereafter, pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors,
the stockholders of the Corporation, acting by written consent in accordance
with Sections 228 and 229 of the DGCL, duly approved the aforesaid amendment to
the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation.

     FOURTH: That the aforesaid amendment to the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of Sections 141, 228, 229 and 242 of the DGCL.

     FIFTH: That said amendment is to become effective upon the filing of this
Certificate of Amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Knology, Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed
by its authorized officer, this 19th day of June, 2001.


                                                  /s/ Chad S. Wachter
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  By: Chad S. Wachter
                                                  Title: Secretary
Tasha Tolar CARRIERE, et al. and Daniel Bihm Marcantel, et al. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

NO. 2018-CC-0322

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

Denied.