alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004325EN.01000301.xml

| 28.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 325/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 325/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1859/2004

of 27 October 2004

specifying the extent to which applications lodged in October 2004 for import certificates in respect of young male bovine animals for fattening may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004 of 29 June 2004 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for young male bovine animals for fattening (1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005) (2), and in particular Article 1(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004 lays down the number of young male bovine animals which may be imported on special terms during the period from 1 October to 31 December 2004. The quantities covered by import licence applications submitted are such that applications may by accepted in full. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004 lays down the number of young male bovine animals which may be imported on special terms during the period from 1 October to 31 December 2004. The quantities covered by import licence applications submitted are such that applications may by accepted in full.

| (2) | The quantities in respect of which licences may be applied for from 1 January 2005 should be fixed within the scope of the total quantity of 169 000 animals, conforming to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities in respect of which licences may be applied for from 1 January 2005 should be fixed within the scope of the total quantity of 169 000 animals, conforming to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import certificates made in the month of October 2004 pursuant to Article 3(3), second subparagraph, third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004 are hereby met in full.

2.   The number of animals referred to in article 1(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1202/2004 is 71 820.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 230, 30.6.2004, p. 19.

2

---
| (1)              | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)              | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| September      15, 2009 | /s/ Warren F.      Kruger                               |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Warren      F. Kruger                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
|                    | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 41 (Thursday, March 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 11688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20302]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
September 11 , 2013 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building, Room W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Subject: Clarification to Petition for Exemption,

FAA - 2013 - 0788 Delta Engineering for Project ODA - 2233 - 03 Title 14 CFR § 2 3 . 1359 ( c ) , amendment 2 3 - 49 Subject: Request for immediate exemption from Title 14 CFR § 2 3 . 1359(c ) for the wire and cable located within certain metal electronic articles. 

### Additional Data related to request :  FAA Advisory

Circular 25 - 16, Section 5, Item (3) provides guidance for compliance with 25.1359 the predecessor to 25.869. o (2)“Earlier wire may

b e used inside the fuselage of later airplanes onl y if its use does not create any significant potential for hazard....” o (A) Enclosed in a case made of metal or other material that complies with the flammability requirements of Amendment 25 - 32 that will either contain an internal fire so that it cannot propagate to other locations or is sufficiently airtight that internal igniti on sources cannot cause a fire; or” Delta Engineering believes this FAA Advisory Circular wording directly supports Delta Engineering’s request for exemption. Sincerel y, John A. Moritz Delta Engineering 13 DRBA Way New Castle County

Airport New Castle, Delaware 1 9720 Phone (302) 325 - 9337 E Mail jamoritz@delta- engineering.com
**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**





**REQUIRED
      BY RULE 13A - 14(B) OR RULE 15D - 14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. 1350**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Inova technology Inc. on Form 10K-SB for
      the period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
       Commission  on  the date hereof (the *"Report"* ),
      I, Bob
      Bates, CFO of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all





material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Bob BatesBob BatesCFOAugust 13, 2008**




**End
      of Filing**
Michael Antonio ANDERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3456

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Terrance Kareem GARRETT v. STATE

CR-15-1015

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 59 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 59 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 59 Filed 09/03/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-26932-AJC Doc 59 Filed 09/03/20 Page 4 of 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           A petrographical and geochemical study of quartzose nodules, country rocks, and dike rocks from the Upheaval Dome structure, Utah      

      January 1, 1999    

Upheaval Dome, in Canyonlands National Park, Utah, USA, is a unique structure on the Colorado Plateau. It has earlier been interpreted as an impact structure or as a pinched-off salt diapir. Some subrounded quartzose fragments were found in a ring depression near the eastern margin of the structure and, based on vesicularity and apparent flow structure, the fragments were interpreted by early researchers as 'impactites.' Our petrographic studies show no indication of a high-temperature history and are in agreement with a slow, low-temperature formation of the quartz nodules. Compositionally, the lag deposit samples are almost pure SiO2. They show no chemical similarity to any of the possible target rocks (e.g., Navajo Sandstone), from which they should have formed by melting if they were impactites. Instead, the samples have relatively high contents of elements that indicate fluid interaction (e.g., hydrothermal growth), such as As, Sb, Ba, and U, and show positive Ce anomalies. Thus, we interpret the 'lag deposit samples' as normal low-temperature (hydrothermally-grown?) quartz that show no indication of being impact-derived. In addition, a petrographic and geochemical analysis of a series of dike samples yielded no evidence for shock metamorphism or a meteoritic component.

## Citation Information
Anthony William LORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert H. Nelson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
  September
      15, 2008
                
                /s/ Robert H.
      NelsonRobert
      H. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
# L_2004258EN.01001601.xml

| 5.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 258/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 258/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1420/2004

of 4 August 2004

determining the extent to which applications for import rights lodged in respect of the quota for frozen meat of bovine animals, provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1203/2004, can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1203/2004 of 29 June 2004 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 (1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005) (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for import rights lodged in accordance with Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1203/2004 shall be accepted at a rate of 14,95821 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 August 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 230, 30.6.2004, p. 27.

2

---
EXHIBIT 10.6

                       ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

         ASSIGNMENT  AND  ASSUMPTION  AGREEMENT  dated this 5th day of November,
2001  between DC Power  Products Acquisition Corp. ("Assignor") and National
Residential Properties, Inc.  ("Assignee").

         WHEREAS:

         A. Assignor has sold its 8% Series A Senior Subordinated Convertible
Redeemable Debentures to Sea Lion Investors LLC, Equity Planners LLC and Myrtle
Holdings LLC having an aggregate original principal face amount of One Million
United States dollars $1,000,000 (singly, a "Debenture," and collectively, the
"Debentures") pursuant to a certain Securities Subscription Agreement, dated as
of October 17, 2001 ("Subscription Agreement"); and

         B. Assignor is a wholly owned Subsidiary of Assignee pursuant to the
laws of the state of Nevada; and

         C. Assignee has merged with Assignor pursuant to a Plan of Merger and
Certificate of ownership dated October 30, 2001 ("Merger"); and

         D. Assignor wishes to assign the Debentures to Assignee and Assignee is
willing to assume the obligations of the Debentures in exchange for valuable
consideration set forth in the Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that Assignor shall assign and Assignee
shall irrevocably and unconditionally assume all of the conditions and
obligations of the Subscription Agreement and Debentures, each dated as of
October 17, 2001 for the benefit of the Purchasers, as defined in the
Subscription Agreement, and the Holder, as defined in the Debentures, and
Assignee hereby certifies that the representations and warranties contained in
the Subscription Agreement are true and correct as of the date hereof, as if
Assignee has entered into and undertaken all of such obligations at the time
these instruments were given, and shall render full performance under such
instruments in the place and stead of Assignor.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                <C>
DC Power Products Acquisition Corp. (Assignor)     National Residential Properties, Inc. (Assignee)


By:      /s/ Christopher Astrom                    By:      /s/ Richard Astrom
   -------------------------------------------       ------------------------
         Christopher Astrom, President                      Richard Astrom, President
</TABLE>
Richard K. INGLIS, as special trustee of the Trust under the last will and testament of Rosa B. Schweiker, dated February 2, 1961; and Bruce D. Berlinger, as the individual trustee of the Trust under the last will and testament of Rosa B. Schweiker, dated February 2, 1961, Petitioners, v. Roberta Sue CASSELBERRY f/k/a Sue C. Berlinger, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-490

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of inContact, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Jarman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    PAUL JARMAN
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Paul Jarman                         
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Director and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Richard Moraw and James Perry, Trustees of the Scott Family 

Trust (Irrevocable)

Appellate case number: 01-20-00102-CV

Trial court case number: 102448-CV

Trial court: 149th District Court of Brazoria County

Relators have filed an emergency motion to stay the jury trial scheduled to begin

February 3, 2020 pending resolution of their petition for writ of mandamus. The motion is 

granted. All proceedings in In re: Scott Family Trust (Irrevocable), No. 102448-CV, in the 

149th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, are stayed. The stay is effective until disposition 

of relators’ petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss_______________

Acting individually 

Date: January 31, 2020
Order entered May 15 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00017
- CR RICARDO BELTRAN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judici al District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10
- 56077
- M



### O RDER The reporter’s record is past due

. We notified court reporter Belinda Baraka on January 8, 2019 that it was overdue and directed her to file it by February 7 , 2019 . We then granted her request for an extension of time, making the record due March 29, 2019. Ms. Baraka filed a request for a second extension which we granted in part, making the record due by May 6, 2019

. In that order, we cautioned Ms. Baraka that the failure to file it by that day would result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has available, including ordering that she not sit until the reporter’s record is filed. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed , and we have had no communication from M s. Baraka.
We ORDER that court reporter Belinda Baraka NOT SIT as a court reporter until she has filed the complete reporter’s record in this appeal.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest White,

Presiding Judge, 194th Jud icial District Court; Belinda Baraka, court reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; to the Dallas County Auditor’s Office; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30418

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BYRON BENJAMIN LASSALLE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:16-CR-35-1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Byron Benjamin Lassalle has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Lassalle has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lassalle’s 

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 14, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30418 Document: 00514722403 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2018
No. 17-30418

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-30418 Document: 00514722403 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6517

WAYNE A. GARRETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director; RUFUS FLEMING,

Regional Director; D. A. GARRAGHTY, Chief

Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections; J.

D. OATES, III, Medical Administrator, Virginia

Department of Corrections; DONALD SWETTER,

M.D., Medical Director, Greenville

Correctional Center; GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL

CENTER; S. ROBINSON, Lt., Correctional

Officer; DOCTOR SHAW; DOCTOR BHULLER, M.D.,

Orthopedics; A. MILLNER, Nurse; COMMONWEALTH

OF VIRGINIA; ROBERT G. O'HARA, Judge, Circuit

Court of the County of Greensville; ROBERT C.

WRENN, Clerk, Circuit Court of the County of

Greensville; M. SHAH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-00-154)

Submitted: October 29, 2004 Decided: November 18, 2004

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Wayne A. Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Michael John Otten, LECLAIR

RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John

David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; John

Adrain Gibney, Jr., THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia;

Christina Kearney Saba, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Anthony Garrett appeals the district court’s orders

denying him appointment of counsel, denying leave to amend his

complaint, and denying relief on his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Garrett v. Angelone, No. CA00-154 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 14, 2002, entered Feb. 15, 2002; filed

April 9, 2002, entered April 10, 2002; filed Jan. 13, 2003, entered

Jan. 14, 2003; filed Jan. 27, 2003, entered Jan. 28, 2003; filed

Feb. 4, 2003, entered Feb. 7, 2003; filed March 14, 2003, entered

March 17, 2003; filed June 23, 2003, entered June 24, 2003; filed

June 23, 2003, entered June 25, 2003; and filed March 3, 2004,

entered March 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED