alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Range indices of geomagnetic activity      

      January 1, 1988    

The simplest index of geomagnetic activity is the range in nT from maximum to minimum value of the field in a given time interval. The hourly range R was recommended by IAGA for use at observatories at latitudes greater than 65??, but was superceded by AE. The most used geomagnetic index K is based on the range of activity in a 3 h interval corrected for the regular daily variation. In order to take advantage of real time data processing, now available at many observatories, it is proposed to introduce a 1 h range index and also a 3 h range index. Both will be computed hourly, i.e. each will have a series of 24 per day, the 3 h values overlapping. The new data will be available as the range (R) of activity in nT and also as a logarithmic index (I) of the range. The exponent relating index to range in nT is based closely on the scale used for computing K values. The new ranges and range indices are available, from June 1987, to users in real time and can be accessed by telephone connection or computer network. Their first year of production is regarded as a trial period during which their value to the scientific and commercial communities will be assessed, together with their potential as indicators of regional and global disturbances' and in which trials will be conducted into ways of eliminating excessive bias at quiet times due to the rate of change of the daily variation field. ?? 1988.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-4203
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RENE CECILIO WILSON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-96-181) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 12, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duncan R. St. Clair, III, ST. CLAIR & JOHNSON, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Fernando Groene, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rene Cecilio Wilson pled guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with illegal re-entry into the United States after deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (West Supp. 1997), and was sentencedto a term of 63 months imprisonment. He seeks to appeal his sentence, alleging that the district court erred in determining thathe previously had been deported after being convicted of an aggravated felony and enhancing his sentence accordingly. See United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 2L1.2(b)(2) (Nov. 1 996). We find that Wilson waived his appeal rights and therefore dismiss the appeal. In his plea agreement, Wilson waived the right to appeal a sentence within the statutory maximum or the manner in which the sentence was determined. This provision of the agreement was brought to his attention by the district court during the plea colloquy and Wilson stated that he understood the waiver and affirmed his intention to waive his appeal rights. A defendant may waive the right to appeal if the waiver is knowing and intelligent. See United States v. Broughton-Jones , 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir. 1995). We find that Wilson's waiver was knowing and voluntary and effectively bars review of his challenge to the district court's application of the sentencing guidelines in his case. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 19034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40414]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE of Louisiana v. Caresses PERIQUE

NO. 2018-KK-0981

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 20, 2018

Rehearing denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant rehearing.

GENOVESE, J., would grant the rehearing, citing Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-50309]




Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 46/Thursday, March 9, 1995/
Corrections

[[Page 13008]]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121

[Docket No. 28072; Notice No. 95-2]
RIN 2120-AF29


Advanced Simulation Plan Revisions

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-3132 beginning on page 8490 in the 
issue of Tuesday, February 14, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 8492, in the third column, under Costs, in the first line, 
``improve'' should read ``impose''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 48749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-40920]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ANM-11]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Salt Lake City, Utah

Correction

    In rule document 95-18917, appearing on page 39247 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 2, 1995, make the following corrections:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    1. On the same page, in the third column, in the 32nd line, insert 
``east'' after ``airspace''.
    2. On the same page, in the third column, in the 38th line, 
``east'' should read ``west ''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2005283EN.01001601.xml

| 16.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/16

---

COMMISSION OPINION

COMMISSION OPINION

of 15 November 2005

concerning the modified plan for the disposal of radioactive waste from the Golfech Nuclear Power Station located in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(2005/C 283/05)

(Only the French text is authentic)

On 13 April 2005, the European Commission received from the Government of France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the modified plan for the disposal of radioactive waste from the Golfech Nuclear Power Station.

On the basis of these General Data and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | The distance between the plant and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case Spain, is approximately 150 km. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distance between the plant and the nearest point on the territory of another Member State, in this case Spain, is approximately 150 km.

| 2. | The planned modification will lead to a general decrease of the gaseous and liquid discharge limits except for liquid tritium, for which an increase is foreseen. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The planned modification will lead to a general decrease of the gaseous and liquid discharge limits except for liquid tritium, for which an increase is foreseen.

| 3. | During normal operation, the planned modification will not cause an exposure of the population in another Member State that is significant from the point of view of health. |
| --- | --- |

3.

During normal operation, the planned modification will not cause an exposure of the population in another Member State that is significant from the point of view of health.

| 4. | In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents resulting from an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the planned modification to the fuel management system will not give rise to any exposure significant from the point of view of health on the population of another Member State. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents resulting from an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the planned modification to the fuel management system will not give rise to any exposure significant from the point of view of health on the population of another Member State.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the modified plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form from the Golfech Nuclear Power Station located in France, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in radioactive contamination, significant from the point of view of health, of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Piezometric levels from 1948 through 1950 for wells screened in the Lloyd sand member of the Raritan formation on Long Island, New York      

      January 1, 1950    

View Document

Since 1932, the United States Geological Survey, in cooperation with the New York Water Power and Control Commission, the Nassau County Department of Public Works, the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors, and later also with the Suffolk County Water Authority, has been making both general and detailed studied dealing with the occurrence, movement, quantity, quality, and temperature of ground water found in the several water-bearing formations on Long Island. In the first years most of the emphasis was placed on studying the shallow water-table beds of Pleistocene age, although geologic and hydrologic information was obtained for the Lloyd sand member of the Raritan formation of upper Cretaceous age, the deepest water-bearing beds on Long Island, as well as for other artesian formations above the Lloyd.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Raritan Formation
                  - New York

View All **
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3677 

AN ACT 

To make a technical correction to the Flood Disaster 

Protection Act of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3677 ES

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

2 Section 102(d)(1)(A) of the Flood Disaster Protec3 tion Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)(1)(A)) is amended 

4 by inserting ‘‘residential’’ before ‘‘improved real estate’’ 

5 each place that term appears. 

Passed the Senate December 12, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3677 

AN ACT 

To make a technical correction to the Flood 

Disaster Protection Act of 1973.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 198 (Friday, October 13, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 53456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-11013]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 198 / Friday, October 13, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 53456]]


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 489

[HSQ-156-CN]
RIN 0938-AD94


Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Survey, Certification and 
Enforcement of Skilled Nursing Facilities and Nursing Facilities

Correction

    In rule document 95-23780 beginning on page 50115, in the issue of 
Thursday, September 28, 1995, make the following correction:


Sec. 489.53  [Corrected]

    On page 50119, in the third column, five stars should have appeared 
before paragraph (b).

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

In re: Case No. 20-10060-RAM

Chapter 13

ROSA MARIA VILLAMAN, 

Debtor

__________________________________/

DEBTOR’S MOTION TO CONVERT CASE TO CHAPTER 11

[Debtor has already paid the fees for Conversion on 3/16/2020]

COMES NOW, Debtor ROSA MARIA VILLAMAN, by and through undersigned counsel,

and files, this Motion to Convert Chapter 13 Case to a Chapter 11 Case, and in support thereof states

as follows:

1. Debtor filed a pro se Voluntary Chapter 13 Petition under the Bankruptcy Code on January

3, 2020; 

2. Thereafter the Debtor filed all required documents including a Chapter 13 Plan; 

3. Unfortunately the Debtor failed to pay the installment of filing fees, and the case was

dismissed. The case was reinstated on April 8, 2020;

4. Debtor desires to convert her case to a Chapter 11 case in order to reorganize an investment

property;

5. Debtor’s investment property is rented, earning sufficient income, and is better suited to be

valued and re-amortized through a Chapter 11 case;

6. It is therefore appropriate to allow the Debtor to convert her case.

WHEREFORE, Debtor ROSA MARIA VILLAMAN, respectfully requests this Honorable

Court to allow the Debtor to Convert this Case to a Chapter 11 case, and for any other relief that is just

and proper under the circumstances. 

1

Case 20-10060-RAM Doc 53 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted on this 16 day of April, 2020. th

I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in

this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

D&S LAW GROUP, P.A.

8751 W. Broward Boulevard

Suite 301

Plantation, Florida 33324

(954) 358-5911 (Telephone)

(954) 357-2267 (Facsimile)

www.DsouzaLegal.com

Email: dtdlaw@aol.com

 

 By: /s/ Elias Leonard Dsouza 

Elias Leonard Dsouza, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 399477

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Debtor’s Motion to Convert Chapter

13 case to a Chapter 11, was served on this 16 day of April, 2020, by ECF only to all parties

th

registered on the ECF system, and by U.S. Mail on all others on the attached Creditor’s Matrix.

D&S LAW GROUP, P.A.

8751 W. Broward Boulevard

Suite 301

Plantation, Florida 33324

(954) 358-5911 (Telephone)

(954) 357-2267 (facsimile)

www.DsouzaLegal.com

Email: dtdlaw@aol.com

 

 By: /s/ Elias Leonard Dsouza 

Elias Leonard Dsouza, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 399477

2

Case 20-10060-RAM Doc 53 Filed 04/16/20 Page 2 of 2
Order entered January 11 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00380
- CV PRESTONWOOD TRADITION, LP; TRADITION MANAGEMENT, LLC; PRESTONWOOD TSL, LP; PRESTONWOOD TS L GP, LLC, ET AL., Appellant s V. MARY JO JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX AND REPRESENTATIVE, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 19
- 03747
- B

ORDER On the C ourt’s own motion, we REMOVE this case from submission on January 12, 2021. We DIRECT the Clerk to set the case for submission without oral argument on March 2, 2021.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS PRESIDING JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2004326EN.01001001.xml

| 29.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 326/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 326/10

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1870/2004

of 28 October 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 11th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2004/2005 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 11th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 46,144 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 23. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).

2

---
Amendment to the Index License Agreement for Funds, dated as of June 21, 2011



 Exhibit 10.62 
 Client Code/Reference No: WFNIA/CA 
 AMENDMENT 

Date of Amendment: June 21st 2011  

AMENDMENT to the Index License Agreement for Funds (the “Agreement”), dated as of May 18, 2000, by and between MSCI
Inc. (“MSCI”), a Delaware corporation, and Barclays Global investors, N.A. (“Licensee”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in the Agreement. 

 

	1.	Exhibit B is hereby amended to allow the Funds to be additionally listed and traded on the Mexican domiciled stock or securities exchanges (herein referred to as the
“Mexican Listed Funds”). All Listed Funds must be issued, sold and traded on a public basis in accordance with the applicable Mexican securities law. All other terms and restrictions contained in Exhibit B shall apply to the Mexican
Listed Funds. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Exhibit A, the Mexican Listed Funds may only be based on the following index: 

  

			
	    MSCI EAFE Growth Index	  	MSCI Japan Small Cap index
	MSCI EAFE Value index	  	MSCI Kokusai Index

 For the avoidance of doubt, the license fees set forth in the Agreement as amended, shall apply with
respect to all Mexican Listed Funds. For clarity, there shall be no separate licensee fees for the Mexican Listed Funds but any additional assets from the Mexican Listed Funds shall be included in the average daily net assets of the applicable US
listed Funds for purposed of calculating license fees. 
  

	2.	This Amendment is intended to amend and operate in conjunction with the Agreement and together this Amendment and the Agreement constitute the complete and exclusive
statement of the agreement between the parties and supersede in full all prior proposals and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof. To the extent that any terms of this Amendment conflict with any terms of the
Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control. No right or license of any kind is granted to Licensee except as expressly provided in the Agreement and this Amendment. 









	3.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict or choice of laws principles.


  

									
	LICENSEE	 		 	MSCI Inc.
					
	By	 	/s/ Jenni A. Lee	 		 	By	 	/s/ Paul Friedman
	Name  	 	Jenni A. Lee	 		 	Name	 	Paul Friedman
		 	(printed)	 		 		 	(printed)
	Title	 	Director	 		 	Title	 	Executive Director
	Date	 	6/28/2001	 		 	Date	 	 

  

			
		
	By	 	/s/ Timothy M. Meyer
	Name  	 	Timothy M. Meyer
		 	(printed)
	Title	 	M. Director
	Date	 	6/28/2011
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 28700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X02-10503]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II--Continued





Department of Justice





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Antitrust Division



United States v. Microsoft Corporation; Public Comments; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 86 / Friday, 
May 3, 2002 / Notices

[[Page 28700]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------