alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9785]



[[Page 19597]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated January 14, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on January 22, 2009 (74 FR 4054), ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, 
238 South Main Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application 
by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as an importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the Phenylacetone to manufacture 
Amphetamine.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to import the basic class 
of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and 
with United States obligations under international treaties, 
conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA 
has investigated ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted 
registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance 
listed.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9785 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 24.5

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Daniel A. Hamann, or Deryl F. Hamann, or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and
on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SPECTRUM BANCORPORATION, INC. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the registration of the cumulative trust preferred securities of Spectrum Capital Trust I and the cumulative trust
preferred securities of Spectrum Capital Trust II, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally
present.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of June, 2002.

|                      |  |   |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  | - |  | -----------------------------------------
|                      |  |   |  | /s/JEFFORY A. ERICKSONJeffory A. Erickson
|STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA |  | ) |  |                                          
|                      |  | ) |  | ss.                                      
|COUNTY OF CODINGTON   |  | ) |  |                                          

On
this 21 day of June 2002, before me, a Notary Public qualified for said County, personally came Jeffory A. Erickson, known to me to be the identical person who signed
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the execution thereof to be his voluntary act and deed.

| |  |                                
| |  | -------------------------------
| |  | /s/SUSAN M. WALKERNotary Public

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RE: SONIA VALES CASE NUMBER:19-25851-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note: documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for February 25, 2020 hearing. All amendments and documents for the February 25, 

2020 hearing were due as of February 7, 2020. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to 

"re-sending" documents)

PLAN @ ECF#15

Serviced 21 days prior: YES DE#23 (12/12)

Continue to 3/24:

Due on or before 5pm on 3/6: 1) plan must be 100% OR @ least 36 months, 2) amend plan to fund properly 

(m. 1-3), 3) obj/conform to cl#2, 4) amend plan to remove payment amount in Section III.B (MTV DE#33), 5) 

good faith to unsecured creditors, 6) FMV of 13 Volvo, 6) Amend plan to disclose last 4 digits of account 

number for Ro-Mont South (POC #4) to Section III.A

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

Case 19-25851-AJC Doc 38 Filed 02/14/20 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7386
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STEVEN A. SILVERS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-87-144-Y) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 28, 1997 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven A. Silvers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. To the extent Appellant's claim is construed as seeking relief pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e), we affirm on the merits on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Silvers , No. CR-87-144-Y (D. Md. July 31, 1996). To the extent Appellant's claim is construed as an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the action, on the modified reasoning that the district court lacks jurisdiction to review the claim. 28 U.S.C.§ 2106 (1994). Because this appeal presents no complex or substantial issues of law, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 233 (Monday, December 7, 2009)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 64317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X09-171207]


[[Page 64317]]




DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)



Statement of Regulatory Priorities
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) administers benefit programs 
that recognize the important public obligations to those who served 
this Nation. VA's regulatory responsibility is almost solely confined 
to carrying out mandates of the laws enacted by Congress relating to 
programs for veterans and their beneficiaries. VA's major regulatory 
objective is to implement these laws with fairness, justice, and 
efficiency.
Most of the regulations issued by VA involve at least one of three VA 
components: The Veterans Benefits Administration, the Veterans Health 
Administration, and the National Cemetery Administration. The primary 
mission of the Veterans Benefits Administration is to provide high-
quality and timely nonmedical benefits to eligible veterans and their 
beneficiaries. The primary mission of the Veterans Health 
Administration is to provide high-quality health care on a timely basis 
to eligible veterans through its system of medical centers, nursing 
homes, domiciliaries, and outpatient medical and dental facilities. The 
primary mission of the National Cemetery Administration is to bury 
eligible veterans, members of the Reserve components, and their 
dependents in VA National Cemeteries and to maintain those cemeteries 
as national shrines in perpetuity as a final tribute of a grateful 
Nation to honor the memory and service of those who served in the Armed 
Forces.
VA's regulatory priorities include a special project to undertake a 
comprehensive review and improvement of its existing regulations. The 
first portion of this project is devoted to reviewing, reorganizing, 
and rewriting the VA's compensation and pension regulations found in 38 
CFR Part 3. The goal of the Regulation Rewrite Project is to improve 
the clarity and logical consistency of these regulations in order to 
better inform veterans and their family members of their entitlements.
BILLING CODE 8320-01-S
Maria Del Socorro Corona FLORES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4555

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Massive CO2 ice deposits sequestered in the south polar layered deposits of Mars      

      August 30, 2011    

Shallow Radar soundings from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter reveal a buried deposit of carbon dioxide (CO2) ice within the south polar layered deposits of Mars with a volume of 9500 to 12,500 cubic kilometers, about 30 times that previously estimated for the south pole residual cap. The deposit occurs within a stratigraphic unit that is uniquely marked by collapse features and other evidence of interior CO2 volatile release. If released into the atmosphere at times of high obliquity, the CO2 reservoir would increase the atmospheric mass by up to 80%, leading to more frequent and intense dust storms and to more regions where liquid water could persist without boiling.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Agile Software Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2005 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bryan D. Stolle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: July 13, 2005 |  | /s/    BRYAN D.
STOLLE                 
|                    |  | Bryan D. Stolle Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Agile Software Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act Filing of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Agile Software Corporation and will be retained by Agile Software Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U

.S

. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## OEC 112014 Mr. Phillip T. Crawford L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. 7601 Maehr Road PO Box 154580 VVaco, Texas 76715-4580 Dear Mr. Crawford: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S

.W. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

VVe have received your petition letter dated November 19, 2014, requesting exemption from 

### §§ 25.785(h)(2), 25.7850), 25.791(a), 25.795, 25.813(e), 25.815, and 25.853(d) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This exemption, ifgranted, would permit relieffrom the requirements offlight-attendant direct view, firm handholds in the passenger compartment, no-smoking placards, security considerations, interior doors between passenger compartments, aisle width, and maximum heat-release and smoke-emissions flammability requirements for large interior panels. You stated that the proposed exemption is specifically intended for application to executive interiors on Boeing Model 787-series airplanes designated as "private use, not for hire, not for common carriage." This request was submitted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (at Regulations.gov) on November 21, 2014, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA-2014-0982. VVe are in the process ofreviewing your request. VVe will contact you ifwe need additional information. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mr. JeffGardlin at ( 425) 227-2136, or by e-mail at Jeff.Gardlin@faa.gov. Sincerely,

Deana M. Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service



### COPY 

### O

f ORIGINAL
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetotelluric imaging of lower crustal melt and lithospheric hydration in the Rocky Mountain Front transition zone, Colorado, USA      

      November 6, 2017    

We present an electrical resistivity model of the crust and upper mantle from two‐dimensional (2‐D) anisotropic inversion of magnetotelluric data collected along a 450 km transect of the Rio Grande rift, southern Rocky Mountains, and High Plains in Colorado, USA. Our model provides a window into the modern‐day lithosphere beneath the Rocky Mountain Front to depths in excess of 150 km. Two key features of the 2‐D resistivity model are (1) a broad zone (~200 km wide) of enhanced electrical conductivity (<20 Ωm) in the midcrust to lower crust that is centered beneath the highest elevations of the southern Rocky Mountains and (2) hydrated lithospheric mantle beneath the Great Plains with water content in excess of 100 ppm. We interpret the high conductivity region of the lower crust as a zone of partially molten basalt and associated deep‐crustal fluids that is the result of recent (less than 10 Ma) tectonic activity in the region. The recent supply of volatiles and/or heat to the base of the crust in the late Cenozoic implies that modern‐day tectonic activity in the western United States extends to at least the western margin of the Great Plains. The transition from conductive to resistive upper mantle is caused by a gradient in lithospheric modification, likely including hydration of nominally anhydrous minerals, with maximum hydration occurring beneath the Rocky Mountain Front. This lithospheric “hydration front” has implications for the tectonic evolution of the continental interior and the mechanisms by which water infiltrates the lithosphere.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

## Related Content

#### Paul A Bedrosian

##### Research Geophysicist

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

pbedrosian@usgs.gov

303-236-4834

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center Building 20Denver, CO80225United States

303-236-1800

303-236-3200

### Explore Search

                  - Geophysics
                  - Structural Geology
                  - Geophysics
                  - Geology
                  - United States
                  - Rocky Mountains
                  - Colorado
                  - magnetotelluric
                  - electrical resistivity

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30221]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sylvester MARTIN Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0400

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# L_2004222EN.01000601.xml

| 23.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 222/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 222/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1142/2004

of 22 June 2004

on the issue of import licences for certain preserved mushrooms imported under the autonomous tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1076/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1076/2004 of 7 June 2004 opening and providing for the administration of an autonomous tariff quota for preserved mushrooms (1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Import licences applied for by traditional importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1076/2004 and submitted to the Commission on 17 and 18 June 2004 shall be issued for 9,53 % of the quantity applied for.

2.   Import licences applied for by new importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1076/2004 and submitted to the Commission on 17 and 18 June 2004 shall be issued for 6,94 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 June 2004.

It shall apply until 31 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture

---

(1)  
  OJ L 203, 8.6.2004, p. 3.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geologic map of the Santa Susana 7.5' quadrangle, southern California: A digital database      

      January 1, 1997    

This Open-File report is a digital geologic map database. This pamphlet serves to introduce and describe the digital data. There is no paper map included in the Open-File report.

This digital map database is compiled from previously published sources combined with some new mapping and modifications in nomenclature. The geologic map database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U. S. Geological Survey. For detailed descriptions of the units, their stratigraphic relations, sources of geologic mapping, and data on exploratory wells consult Yerkes and Campbell (1995), and Yerkes and Showalter (1990). More specific information about the units may be available in the original sources.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Santa Susana
                  - california

View All **
LEE WETHERINGTON HOMES, LLC, Appellant, v. Brian A. SCHAFFER, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017.

Robert P. Watrous of Robert P. Watrous, Chartered, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Jennifer Anne Gore Maglio of Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A. Law Firm, Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.