alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 31

           CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kenneth C. Lowe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Transition Auto Finance
III (TAF III).

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TAF III as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. TAF III's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for TAF III and we have:

      a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to TAF III, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of TAF III's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
      internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
      supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
      financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
      external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
      principles; and

      d. Disclosed in this report any change in TAF III's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during TAF III's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, TAF III's internal control over financial reporting;
      and

5. TAF III's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and TAF III's Board of Directors:

      a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect TAF III's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for TAF
      III's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in TAF III's internal controls.

Date: August 24, 2005

/s/ Kenneth C. Lowe
-------------------------------------------
Kenneth C. Lowe,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

                                       25
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Methods for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in Rural Basins in the Southeastern United States: South Carolina      

      September 15, 2009    

For more than 50 years, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has been developing regional regression equations that can be used to estimate flood magnitude and frequency at ungaged sites. Flood magnitude relates to the volume of flow that occurs over some period of time and usually is presented in cubic feet per second. Flood frequency relates to the probability of occurrence of a flood; that is, on average, what is the likelihood that a flood with a specified magnitude will occur in any given year (1 percent chance, 10 percent chance, 50 percent chance, and so on). Such flood estimates are needed for the efficient design of bridges, highway embankments, levees, and other structures near streams. In addition, these estimates are needed for the effective planning and management of land and water resources, to protect lives and property in flood-prone areas, and to determine flood-insurance rates.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Toby D Feaster

##### Hydrologist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

tfeaster@usgs.gov

803-750-6100

#### Anthony J Gotvald, PE

##### Surface-Water Specialist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

agotvald@usgs.gov

678-924-6648

## Related Content

#### Toby D Feaster

##### Hydrologist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

tfeaster@usgs.gov

803-750-6100

#### Anthony J Gotvald, PE

##### Surface-Water Specialist

South Atlantic Water Science Center (SAWSC)

agotvald@usgs.gov

678-924-6648

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Georgia
                  -  North Carolina
                  -  South Carolina

View All **
1

ALD

- 007 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 16

- 3493

___________ IN RE: THOMAS THORNDIKE , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the Uni ted States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J . Civ. No. 1

- 1 5

- cv - 0 2014 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

October 13, 2016 Before: MCKEE, JORDAN and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges

(O pinion filed : November 1, 2016 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Petitioner Thomas Thorndike seeks a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 , to compel the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to issue a ruling on his habeas petit ion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241

.

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

Thorndike filed his petition in March 2015. The Government filed a response to the habeas petition in June 201 5 , to which Thorndike replied later that same month . At the time Thorndike submitted his mandamus petit ion to this Court, his habeas petition had been ripe and pending for about four teen month s. However, the record reflects that the District Court denied habeas relief by a Memorandum Opinion and O rder entered September 8, 2016 , prior to the Clerk’s receipt of Thorndike’s motion for leave to proceed with this proceeding in forma pauperis

. As the District Court has ruled on the habeas petition, Thorndike has received the relief sought in his mandamus petition. Thus, we will dismiss the petition as moot. Se e Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996)

. If Thorndike wishes to seek appellate review of the District Court’s adverse decision with respect to his habeas petition, he should file his notice of appeal in the District Court within the time period set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B)

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2564

JOHN H. DOUGLAS; MARY E. DOUGLAS,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 96-21113)

Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Douglas, Mary E. Douglas, Appellants Pro Se. Bruce Raleigh

Ellisen, Thomas James Sawyer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John H. and Mary E. Douglas appeal from the tax court’s order

determining deficiencies with respect to their 1992 and 1993 federal income tax liabilities. Our review of the record and the tax

court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Douglas v. Commissioner, No. 96-21113 (U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 24, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

BRUCE CARR, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ No. 488, 2014 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware, 

§ in and for New Castle County 

§ Cr. ID 82002234DI 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: October 20, 2014 

 Decided: December 11, 2014 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, RIDGELY, and VALIHURA, Justices 

O R D E R

 This 11th day of December 2014, after careful consideration of the 

opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find 

it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the 

Superior Court=s order dated August 6, 2014, which adopted the 

Commissioner’s findings and well-reasoned recommendation dated July 10, 

2014. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s untimely 

and repetitive motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and 

that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles. 
2

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Viva International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that: 

 

 (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| Dated:  May 24, 2006 | By: | /s/ Robert J. Scott |
|----------------------|-----|---------------------|

Robert J. Scott, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 
| Dated:  May 24, 2006 | By: | /s/ Robert J. Scott |
|----------------------|-----|---------------------|

Robert J. Scott, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Form CGFCRD3T (2/16/2021)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−24331−PDR

Chapter: 13

In re:

Ralph Levi Sanders Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

SSN: xxx−xx−6171

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing will be held before the Honorable Peter D. Russin to consider the

following:

Motion to Extend Time to Appeal (120 Order on Motion to Compel) Filed by Debtor Ralph Levi

Sanders Jr. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment) (Ferere, Magali) (131)

1. This matter has been set on the Court's motion calendar for a non−evidentiary hearing. The allotted

time for this matter is ten minutes. The hearing will be held:

Date: June 1, 2021

Time: 01:00 PM

Location: Telephone by CourtSolutions LLC

2. The hearing scheduled by this notice will take place only by telephone. DO NOT GO TO THE

COURTHOUSE. Attorneys must advise their clients not to appear at the courthouse. Individuals not

represented by counsel will be able to use the telephonic services free of charge. Although conducted

by telephone, the hearing is a court proceeding. The formalities of the courtroom must be observed.

All participants must exercise civility, and otherwise conduct themselves in a manner consistent with

the dignity of the Court.

3. To participate through CourtSolutions, you must make a reservation in advance no later than 3:00

p.m., one business day before the date of the hearing. Reservations should be arranged online at

https://www.court−solutions.com. If a party is unable to register online, a reservation may also be

made by telephone at (917) 746−7476.

4. The movant, or movant's counsel if represented by an attorney, must:

(a) serve a copy of this notice of hearing and, unless previously served, the above−described

document(s) on all required parties within the time frame required by the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure, the local rules of this Court, and orders of the Court, and

(b) file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B).

Any party who fails to properly serve any pleading or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be

heard thereon.

5. PLEASE NOTE: No person may record the proceedings from any location by any means. The audio

recording maintained by the Court will be the sole basis for creation of a transcript that constitutes the

official record of the hearing.

Dated: 5/21/21 CLERK OF COURT

By: Christina Romero

Courtroom Deputy

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 132 Filed 05/21/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centra Software, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Michelle M. Caggiano, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, of the Company, certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                                      
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Michelle M. Caggiano                                             
|                  |  | Michelle M. Caggiano Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States: Part 10, the Great Basin      

      January 1, 1964    

View Document

View Plate 1

View Plate 2

The probable magnitude of floods of any recurrence interval between 1.1 and 50 years for any stream in the Great Basin can be determined by methods presented in this report.

The Great Basin comprises nearly all of Nevada, western Utah, eastern California, and parts of Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming. The physiography of the basin is a series of mountain ranges and desert valleys, which trend in a north-south direction. Extreme variations in climate from arid to humid are attributed to the mountains, which, in general, are at right angles to the prevailing westerly winds. The area is subject to cloudburst floods and mud-rock flows, and this situation often results in high rates of runoff and heavy erosion from small drainage basins. The greater part of the basin is desert, and because of the paucity of flood data, the flood characteristics are poorly defined.

Two sets of curves are provided for estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods: (1) curves that represent the ratio of a flood of any frequency to the mean annual flood, and (2) curves that relate the mean annual flood to the size of the drainage basin and, where significant, to the mean altitude of the basin. Using these curves, a flood of a selected frequency can be determined for any site within the range of the base data. Separate 50-year flood graphs are shown for most of the larger rivers that are affected by regulation or diversion.

The report also contains station descriptions and lists of peak discharges for 364 gaging stations at which flood records have been collected for 5 or more years. 

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Great Basin
                  - california
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his
      knowledge, the annual report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Intermost
      Corporation, a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”), for the period ended June
      30, 2007:





1.  Fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      certification is being provided
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of this Report, nor
      is
      it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.





Date:    October
      25, 2007





By:           __/s/
      Rocky Wulianghai________________


Rocky
      Wulianghai, Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling landowner interactions and development patterns at the urban fringe      

      November 6, 2018    

Population growth and unrestricted development policies are driving low-density urbanization and fragmentation of peri-urban landscapes across North America. While private individuals own most undeveloped land, little is known about how their decision-making processes shape landscape-scale patterns of urbanization over time. We introduce a hybrid agent-based modeling (ABM) – cellular automata (CA) modeling approach, developed for analyzing dynamic feedbacks between landowners’ decisions to sell their land for development, and resulting patterns of landscape fragmentation. Our modeling approach builds on existing conceptual frameworks in land systems modeling by integrating an ABM into an established grid-based land-change model – FUTURES. The decision-making process within the ABM involves landowner agents whose decision to sell their land to developers is a function of heterogeneous preferences and peer-influences (i.e., spatial neighborhood relationships). Simulating landowners’ decision to sell allows an operational link between the ABM and the CA module. To test our hybrid ABM-CA approach, we used empirical data for a rapidly growing region in North Carolina for parameterization. We conducted a sensitivity analysis focusing on the two most relevant parameters—spatial actor distribution and peer-influence intensity—and evaluated the dynamic behavior of the model simulations. The simulation results indicate different peer-influence intensities lead to variable landscape fragmentation patterns, suggesting patterns of spatial interaction among landowners indirectly affect landscape-scale patterns of urbanization and the fragmentation of undeveloped forest and farmland.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Carolina

View All **
| EXHIBIT      21.1 |
|-------------------|

| SUBSIDIARIES      OF REGISTRANT |
|---------------------------------|

|  Name                                     |   | State      ofIncorporation/Organization |   | Collectors      UniverseOwnership      Percentage |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |   |                                    |   |                                              |
| Collectors      Finance Corporation            |   | California                              |   | 100%                                              |
|                                           |   |                                    |   |                                              |
| Certified      Asset Exchange, Inc.            |   | Delaware                                |   | 100%                                              |
|                                           |   |                                    |   |                                              |
| Gem      Certification and Assurance Lab, Inc. |   | Delaware                                |   | 100%                                              |
|                                           |   |                                    |   |                                              |
| American      Gemological Laboratories, Inc.   |   | New      York                           |   | 100%                                              |
|                                           |   |                                    |   |                                              |
| Expos      Unlimited, LLC                      |   | California                              |   | 100%                                              |
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL