alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stan Abrams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Nathaniel Energy
Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

June 10, 2003                                /s/ Stan Abrams
                                                --------------------------------
                                                 Stan Abrams
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           New method for the measurement of osmium isotopes applied to a New Zealand Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary shale      

      January 1, 1986    

The determination of osmium content and isotopic abundances in geological materials has received increasing attention in recent years following the proposal of Alvarez et al.1 that mass extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous period were caused by the impact of a large (???10km) meteorite which left anomalously high iridium levels as a geochemical signature in the boundary shales. Here we report a new and simple method for measuring osmium in geological materials, involving fusion of the sample with sodium peroxide, distillation of the osmium as the tetroxide using perchloric acid, extraction into chloroform, and absorption of the chloroform extract onto graphite powder before instrumental neutron activation analysis. In a variant of this technique, the chloroform extract is back-extracted into an aqueous phase and the osmium isotopes are determined by plasma-source mass spectrometry (ICPMS). We have used this method on the Woodside Creek (New Zealand) Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary clay and have obtained the first osmium content (6g ng g-1) for this material. The 187Os/186Os ratio is 1.12??0.16, showing a typical non-crustal signature. This combined distillation-extraction- ICPMS method will prove to be useful for measuring osmium isotopes in other geological materials. ?? 1986 Nature Publishing Group.

## Citation Information
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 30 , 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00350

- CV

DR. ABDUL MEMOM AND ABDUL Q. MEMOM, M.D. & ASSOCIATES RETIREMENT TRUST , Appellant s

V.
MICHAEL COLLINS A/K/ A MICHAEL A. COLLINS A/K/A MICHAEL C. COLLINS A/K/A MICHAEL A.C. COLLINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 11000

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 25, 2014 . The notice of appeal was filed February 23, 2015 . To date, our records show that appellant s h ave not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of
fees in civil cas es unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from2 paying costs ); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207. On May 1 , 2015, this court ordered appellants to pay the appellate filing fee on or before May 11 , 2015, or the appeal
would be dismissed. Appellant s have not paid the appellate filing fee.
Further, n o clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant s did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On May 11, 2015, th e court notified all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days
, appellants paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 3 7.3(b).
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby

.
<EX-23.1>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Viador Inc:


The audits referred to in our report dated March 27, 2002, included the related
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2001, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.  This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our
audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-91805 and 333-46238) on Form S-8 of Viador Inc of our report dated March
27, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Viador Inc and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2001, and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the
related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,
2001, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Viador Inc.

Our report dated March 27, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
April 8, 2002


<PAGE>
# L_2004366EN.01000501.xml

| 11.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 366/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 366/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2109/2004

of 10 December 2004

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5 the conditions for applications and for the issue of import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

| (2) | Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 at 11 500 t.

| (3) | It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this Regulation will, throughout the period of validity, be open for use only in so far as provisions on health protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 December 2004 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.

2.   Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of January 2005 for 6 067,098 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

2

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Lead exposure in American black ducks after implementation of non-toxic shot      

      January 1, 2000    

Lead poisoning from the ingestion of spent shotgun pellets has been recognized as an important disease of North American waterfowl since Bellrose's (1959) research >40 years ago. Nation-wide regulations banning the use of lead shot for waterfowl hunting were established in 1991. We compared the prevalence of lead exposure in American black ducks (Anas rubripes) wintering on 2 areas in Tennessee before (1986-88) and after the ban (1997-99) to assess the effect of the ban on lead shot on this species. Prevalence of elevated blood lead in black ducks declined by 44% from before (11.7% prevalence) to after (6.5% prevalence) the implementation of non-toxic shot. The reduction in lead exposure was pronounced in adult black ducks (from 14.3% to 5.3%). However, prevalence in lead exposure remained similar in juvenile black ducks (from 8.2% to 8.3%). Additional evidence from lead ingestion and lead poisoning mortality events also indicates that lead exposure has declined in waterfowl in the Mississippi flyway. We believe that lead ingestion will continue to decline, despite the persistence of lead shot in some wetlands. The impact of reduced lead exposure on waterfowl populations needs to be assessed.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - tennessee

View All **
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41006

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE DUARTE-MALDONADO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-300-1

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose DuarteMaldonado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Duarte-Maldonado has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4761 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4761

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, California, as the ``Louis 
                       Van Iersel Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2016

Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Huffman, Mr. 
Garamendi, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. Matsui, Mr. 
Bera, Mr. Cook, Mr. McNerney, Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Lee, Ms. 
 Speier, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Costa, Mr. Honda, Ms. Eshoo, 
  Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Farr, Mrs. Capps, Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. 
 Schiff, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Aguilar, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. 
 Ted Lieu of California, Mr. Becerra, Mrs. Torres, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Bass, 
    Mr. Royce, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Takano, Ms. Maxine Waters of 
 California, Ms. Hahn, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Vargas, Mr. 
 Peters, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Denham, Mr. Valadao, Mr. Nunes, 
   Mr. McCarthy, Mr. Knight, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. 
   Calvert, Mrs. Mimi Walters of California, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of 
 California, Mr. Issa, and Mr. Hunter) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, California, as the ``Louis 
                       Van Iersel Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOUIS VAN IERSEL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 61 South Baldwin Avenue in Sierra Madre, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Louis Van Iersel Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Louis Van 
Iersel Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
14 January 2016

United States Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590

ATTN: Mr Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Federal Aviation Administration

RE: Request for Information in regard to Modification for HAZON Solutions 

Exemption No. 11442, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0218 under Section 333 of the 

Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and Part 11 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir:

In reference to your letter dated 13 January 2016 requesting additional information regarding 

the additional sUAS for HAZON Solutions Exemption No 11442 the following information is 

provided.

Aircraft Power Supply

Micro UAV Hazon Hex Battery

Formica X4 Battery

Sealed Bubble X8 Battery

Formica X8 Battery

FlyAbility Gimball Battery

UAV America Mule Quad / Eagle Battery

The UAV America Mule was the preproduction name of the UAV America Eagle. It is now 

sold by UAV America as the UAV America Eagle. It is technically identical to the UAV 

America Mule/Eagle that was submitted in the modification request. HAZON Solutions 

considers this a minor administrative name change.

Sincerely,

David A Culler Jr.

CEO, HAZON Solutions, LLC
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-110113]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

28 CFR Part 90

[OJP No. 1015]
RIN 1121-AA27


Grants to Combat Violent Crimes Against Women

Correction

    In proposed rule document 94-31877 beginning on page 66830 in the 
issue of Wednesday, December 28, 1994, on the same page, in the second 
column, in the first full paragraph, text was omitted from the second 
sentence, it should read as set forth below:
    ``Units of local government, Indian tribal governments and non-
porfit, non-governmental victim service programs are eligible to apply 
to States for subgrants under this program. Indian tribal governments 
are also eligible to apply directly to the Office of Justice Programs 
for discretionary grants under Subpart C of these regulations.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 19, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00411

- CR

Kenneth Neil Schlanker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE J ONES, JUSTICES PEMBE RTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal sho uld be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the appeal is

dismissed in accordance with the opinion of this Court; and it appearing that the appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudic ation as to costs is made; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4768 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4768

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2016

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature of judicial 
     review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory 
                              provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Separation of Powers Restoration Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATUTORY AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS.

    Section 706 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``To the extent necessary'' and inserting 
        ``(a) To the extent necessary'';
            (2) by striking ``decide all relevant questions of law, 
        interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and'';
            (3) by inserting after ``of the terms of an agency action'' 
        the following ``and decide de novo all relevant questions of 
        law, including the interpretation of constitutional and 
        statutory provisions, and rules made by agencies. 
        Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this subsection 
        shall apply in any action for judicial review of agency action 
        authorized under any provision of law. No law may exempt any 
        such civil action from the application of this section except 
        by specific reference to this section''; and
            (4) by striking ``The reviewing court shall--'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(b) The reviewing court shall--''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 10839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20228]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ESTATE OF Lillian Sulather PLEASURE, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1981

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Matthew David BAILEY v. STATE

CR-15-0974

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 12, 2017

Affirmed.
Jesus LOZOYA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.