alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         142,721
<SECURITIES>                                   157,154
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                       603
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,391
<PP&E>                                          10,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 430,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                     412,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   430,801
<SALES>                                         21,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,198
<CGS>                                            1,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Meteorological data for selected sites along the Colorado River Corridor, Arizona, 2011-13      

      December 29, 2014    

View Document

View Appendix 1

View Appendix 2

View Appendix 3

View Appendix 4

This report presents data from 14 automated weather stations collected as part of an ongoing monitoring program within the Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon Recreation Area along the Colorado River Corridor in Arizona. Weather data presented in this document include precipitation, wind speed, maximum wind gusts, wind direction, barometric pressure, relative humidity, and air temperature collected by the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center at 4-minute intervals between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, using automated weather stations consisting of a data logger and a weather transmitter equipped with a piezoelectric sensor, ultrasonic transducers, and capacitive thermal and pressure sensors. Data collection was discontinuous because of station additions, station removals, changes in permits, and equipment failure. A large volume of data was collected for each station. These data are part of a larger research effort focused on physical processes affecting landscapes and archaeological-site stability in the Colorado River Corridor—both natural processes (including meteorological events) and those related to the Glen Canyon Dam operations. Meteorological conditions during the study interval were warmer and drier than is typical, due to ongoing drought conditions during the time period studied. The El Niño/Southern Oscillation was primarily in a neutral state during the reporting period.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Helen C Fairley

##### Social Scientist

Southwest Biological Science Center

hfairley@usgs.gov

928-556-7285

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

## Related Content

#### Helen C Fairley

##### Social Scientist

Southwest Biological Science Center

hfairley@usgs.gov

928-556-7285

#### Joel B Sankey, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Southwest Biological Science Center

jsankey@usgs.gov

928-556-7289

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7094

928-556-7092

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - colorado river corridor
                  - Arizona

View All **
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Sidney Chan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ALR Technologies Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th day of April, 2004.



| | /s/ Sidney Chan
Sidney Chan
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

37500

Vol. 60, No. 139

Thursday, July 20, 1995

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35944; File No. SR-Amex95-26]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Filing

of Proposed Rule Change by the

American Stock Exchange, Inc.

Relating to Options and Long-Term

Options on the Morgan Stanley High

Technology 35 Index and Long-Term

Options on a Reduced-Value Morgan

Stanley High Technology 35 Index

Correction

In notice document 95–17203

beginning on page 36167 in the issue of

Thursday, July 13, 1995, in the third

column, the release number should read

as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 94–NM–224–AD; Amendment

39–9286; AD 95–13–06]

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing

Model 747 Series Airplanes Equipped

With General Electric Model CF6-80C2

Series Engines or Pratt & Whitney

Model PW4000 Series Engines

Correction

In rule document 95–15300 beginning

on page 33338 in the issue of

Wednesday, June 28, 1995, make the

following correction:

§ 39.13 [Corrected]

On page 33342, in the first column, in

§ 39.13, in airworthiness directive 95–

13–06, pargraph (c), in the table, in the

first column, the last entry should read

‘‘92–24–51’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

[Dept. Circular 570; 1995 Revision]

Companies Holding Certificates of

Authority as Acceptable Sureties on

Federal Bonds and as Acceptable

Reinsuring Companies

Effective July 1, 1995.

Correction

In notice document 95–16154

beginning on page 34436 in the issue of

Friday, June 30, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 34442, in the second column,

in the 7th line, under the heading,

Hartford Fire Insurance Company,

‘‘$130,418,000.’’ should read

‘‘$310,418,000.’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Hector VARGAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Morphology and textures of modern sediments on the inner shelf of South Carolina's Long Bay from Little River Inlet to Winyah Bay      

      May 19, 2007    

View Document

High-resolution sea-floor mapping techniques, including sidecan-sonar, seismic-reflection, swath bathymetric systems, and bottom sampling, were used to map the geologic framework offshore of the northern South Carolina coast in order to provide a better understanding of the physical processes controlling coastal erosion and shoreline change. Four general sea floor environments were identified through analysis of sidescan-sonar, swath bathymetry, and surface sediment texture: inlet shoal complexes, shore-detached shoals, hardground, and mixed zones. Inlet shoal complexes generally lie offshore of modern inlet systems, with the exception of a shore-detached shoal lying offshore of Myrtle Beach. The shoals show 1 - 3 m in relief and comprise the largest accumulations of modern sediment within the inner shelf survey area. Surficial sediments within the shoal complexes are characterized by a low-backscatter, moderately sorted fine sand. Hardground areas are characterized by exposures of Cretaceous and Tertiary strata and Pleistocene channel-fill deposits. These areas display little to no bathymetric relief and are characterized by high-backscatter, coarser grained sand. Mixed zones show small-scale spatial variations in bathymetry, surface texture and backscatter. These areas are characterized by a thin layer of modern sediment (< 1 m) and exposures of Cretaceous strata and Pleistocene channel-fill deposits.

Textural and geomorphic variations suggest a long-term net southerly flow within the study area. The general acoustic and textural character of the inner shelf within Long Bay suggests long-term erosion, reworking and continued modification of inner-shelf deposits by modern nearshore processes.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - long bay
                  - South Carolina

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3630 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3630

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2012

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ``Captain 
                    Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN RHETT W. SCHILLER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate December 19, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Octavius Shuman BRYANT v. STATE

CR-15-1009

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Lahars at Cotopaxi and Tungurahua Volcanoes, Ecuador: Highlights from stratigraphy and observational records and related downstream hazards      

      January 1, 2015    

Lahars are volcanic debris flows that are dubbed primary when triggered by eruptive activity or secondary when triggered by other factors such as heavy rainfall after eruptive activity has waned. Variation in time and space of the proportion of sediment to water within a lahar dictates lahar flow phase and the resultant sedimentary character of deposits. Characteristics of source material and of debris eroded and incorporated during flow downstream may strongly affect the grain-size composition of flowing lahars and their deposits. Lahars borne on the flanks of two steep-sided stratocones in Ecuador exemplify two important lahar types. Glacier-clad Cotopaxi volcano has been a producer of primary lahars that flow great distances downstream. Such primary lahars include those of both clast-rich and matrix-rich composition—some of which have flowed as far as 325 km to the Pacific Ocean. Cotopaxi's last important eruption in 1877 generated formidable syneruptive lahars comparable in size to those that buried Armero, Colombia, following the 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz volcano. In contrast, ash-producing eruptive activity during the past 15 years at Tungurahua volcano has generated a continual supply of fresh volcaniclastic debris that is regularly remobilized by precipitation. Between 2000 and 2011, 886 rain-generated lahars were registered at Tungurahua. These two volcanoes pose dramatically different hazards to nearby populations. At Tungurahua, the frequency and small sizes of lahars have resulted in effective mitigation measures. At Cotopaxi 137 years have passed since the last important lahar-producing eruption, and there is now a high-risk situation for more than 100,000 people living in downstream valleys.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### James W. Vallance

##### Research Geologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

jvallance@usgs.gov

360-993-8959

## Related Content

#### James W. Vallance

##### Research Geologist

Cascades Volcano Observatory

jvallance@usgs.gov

360-993-8959

### Study Area

### Contact

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - ecuador
                  - Cotopaxi volcano
                  -  Tungurahua volcano

View All **
Case 19-18149-JKO Doc 15 Filed 07/03/19 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-18149-JKO Doc 15 Filed 07/03/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-18149-JKO Doc 15 Filed 07/03/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-18149-JKO Doc 15 Filed 07/03/19 Page 4 of 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: February 1980      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: 

MARLENE LAFOREST,

Case No. 19-20438-AJC

Chapter 13 Debtor.

/

ORDER OVERRULING DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO AMENDED CLAIM

OF WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on March 24, 2020, on the Debtor’s Objection to 

Amended Proof of Claim No. 1 of Wells Fargo Bank National Association [ECF # 49]. Being 

duly advised in the premises, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. At the March 24, 2020, hearing on this matter counsel for creditor Wells Fargo

Bank National Association announced on the record that the creditor would be filing a new 

Amended Proof of Claim which corrects and adjusts the mortgage escrow analysis portion of 

its Proof of Claim.

2. Based on these representations, the Debtor’s Objection to Amended Claim No. 1

filed at ECF # 49 is OVERULLED AS MOOT.

A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 25, 2020.

Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 54 Filed 03/26/20 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Creditor Wells Fargo Bank N.A. shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this

Order to file its new Amended Proof of Claim in accordance with paragraph 1 above.

4. Debtor shall have the right to object to Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s newly filed

Amended Proof of Claim after review.

###

Submitted By:

Matt Bayard, Esq.

Attorney Matt Bayard Esq. is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested 

parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.

Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 54 Filed 03/26/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Monogenetic origin of Ubehebe Crater maar volcano, Death Valley, California: Paleomagnetic and stratigraphic evidence      

      April 1, 2018    

Paleomagnetic data for samples collected from outcrops of basaltic spatter at the Ubehebe Crater cluster, Death Valley National Park, California, record a single direction of remanent magnetization indicating that these materials were emplaced during a short duration, monogenetic eruption sequence ~ 2100 years ago. This conclusion is supported by geochemical data encompassing a narrow range of oxide variation, by detailed stratigraphic studies of conformable phreatomagmatic tephra deposits showing no evidence of erosion between layers, by draping of sharp rimmed craters by later tephra falls, and by oxidation of later tephra layers by the remaining heat of earlier spatter. This model is also supported through a reinterpretation and recalculation of the published age results (Sasnett et al., 2012) from an innovative and bold exposure-age study on very young materials. Their conclusion of multiple and protracted eruptions at Ubehebe Crater cluster is here modified through the understanding that some of their quartz-bearing clasts inherited from previous exposure on the fan surface (too old), and that other clasts were only exposed at the surface by wind and/or water erosion centuries after their eruption (too young). Ubehebe Crater cluster is a well preserved example of young monogenetic maar type volcanism protected within a National Park, and it represents neither a protracted eruption sequence as previously thought, nor a continuing volcanic hazard near its location.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Andrew Cyr

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

acyr@usgs.gov

650-439-2820

#### Judith Fierstein

##### Research Geologist

California Volcano Observatory

jfierstn@usgs.gov

	650-329-5202

#### Wes Hildreth

##### Senior Scientist (ST)

California Volcano Observatory

hildreth@usgs.gov

650-329-5231

## Related Content

#### Andrew Cyr

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

acyr@usgs.gov

650-439-2820

#### Judith Fierstein

##### Research Geologist

California Volcano Observatory

jfierstn@usgs.gov

	650-329-5202

#### Wes Hildreth

##### Senior Scientist (ST)

California Volcano Observatory

hildreth@usgs.gov

650-329-5231

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center          

Building 19, 350 N. Akron Rd.P.O. Box 158Moffett Field, CA94035United States

#### USGS Volcano Science Center

1300 SE Cardinal CourtVancouver, WA38683United States

360-993-8900

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Death Valley
                  - california

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 221 (Thursday, November 16, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 57628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21116]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. 28371]


Study of FAA Regulation and Certification Capabilities

Correction

    In notice document 95-27229 beginning on page 55750, in the issue 
of Thursday, November 2, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 55750, in the third column, under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION:, in the heading entitled ``Background'', in the first 
paragraph, in the second line from the bottom, ``AA'' should read 
``FAA''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 2 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 3 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 4 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 5 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 6 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 7 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 8 of 9
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 155 Filed 06/16/21 Page 9 of 9
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000719 30-SEP-2019 07:53 AM