alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1



MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |                              
|------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                         |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Agile Canadian Holdings, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|Agile Software International Holdings, LLC |  | Delaware                     
|Agile Software (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.          |  | China                        
|Agile Software AG                          |  | Switzerland                  
|Agile Software Enterprise Pvt. Ltd.        |  | India                        
|Agile Software GmbH                        |  | Austria                      
|Agile Software GmbH                        |  | Germany                      
|Agile Software International Corporation   |  | Delaware                     
|Agile Software Kabushiki Kaisha            |  | Japan                        
|Agile Software Limited                     |  | Taiwan                       
|Agile Software Limited                     |  | UK                           
|Cimmetry Systems Corp.                     |  | Nova Scotia, Canada
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Late Pliocene and Quaternary Eurasian locust infestations in the Canary Archipelago      

      January 1, 2011    

The Canary Archipelago has long been a sensitive location to record climate changes of the past. Interbedded with its basalt lavas are marine deposits from the principal Pleistocene interglacials, as well as aeolian sands with intercalated palaeosols. The palaeosols contain African dust and innumerable relict egg pods of a temperate‐region locust (cf. Dociostaurus maroccanusThunberg 1815). New ecological and stratigraphical information reveals the geological history of locust plagues (or infestations) and their palaeoclimatic significance. Here, we show that the first arrival of the plagues to the Canary Islands from Africa took place near the end of the Pliocene, ca. 3 Ma, and reappeared with immense strength during the middle Late Pleistocene preceding MIS (marine isotope stage) 11 (ca. 420 ka), MIS 5.5 (ca. 125 ka) and probably during other warm interglacials of the late Middle Pleistocene and the Late Pleistocene. During the Early Holocene, locust plagues may have coincided with a brief cool period in the current interglacial. Climatically, locust plagues on the Canaries are a link in the chain of full‐glacial arid–cold climate (calcareous dunes), early interglacial arid–sub‐humid climate (African dust inputs and locust plagues), peak interglacial warm–humid climate (marine deposits with Senegalese fauna), transitional arid–temperate climate (pedogenic calcretes), and again full‐glacial arid–cold climate (calcareous dunes) oscillations. During the principal interglacials of the Pleistocene, the Canary Islands recorded the migrations of warm Senegalese marine faunas to the north, crossing latitudes in the Euro‐African Atlantic. However, this northward marine faunal migration was preceded in the terrestrial realm by interglacial infestations of locusts.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Daniel Muhs

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dmuhs@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

## Related Content

#### Daniel Muhs

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dmuhs@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

### Contacts

#### Daniel Muhs

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

dmuhs@usgs.gov

303-236-7919
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Reevaluation of background iodine-129 concentrations in water from the Snake River Plain aquifer, Idaho, 2003      

      January 1, 2003    

Background concentrations of iodine-129 (129I, half-life = 15.7 million years) resulting from natural production in the earth?s atmosphere, in situ production in the earth by spontaneous fission of uranium-238(238U), and fallout from nuclear weapons tests conducted in the 1950s and 1960s were reevaluated on the basis of 52 analyses of ground- and surface-water samples collected from the eastern Snake River Plain in southeastern Idaho. The background concentration estimated using the results of a subset of 30 ground-water samples analyzed in this reevaluation is 5.4 attocuries per liter (aCi/L; 1 aCi = 10-18 curies) and the 95-percent nonparametric confidence interval is 5.2 to 10.0 aCi/L. In a previous study, a background 129I concentration was estimated on the basis of analyses of water samples from 16 sites on or tributary to the eastern Snake River Plain. At the 99-percent confidence level, background concentrations of 129I in that study were less than or equal to 8.2 aCi/L.

During 1993?94, 34 water samples from 32 additional sites were analyzed for 129I to better establish the background concentrations in surface and ground water from the eastern Snake River Plain that is presumed to be unaffected by wastedisposal practices at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). Surface water contained larger 129I concentrations than water from springs and wells contained. Because surface water is more likely to be affected by anthropogenic fallout and evapotranspiration, background 129I concentrations were estimated in the current research using the laboratory results of ground-water samples that were assumed to be unaffected by INEEL disposal practices.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Snake River Plain Aquifer
                  - Idaho

View All **
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 INGRAM MICRO INC. 

SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTMENT SAVINGS PLAN 
 The Ingram Micro Inc. Supplemental Investment Savings Plan, which was restated as of December 31, 2008, is hereby amended in the following manner in accordance with the amendment procedures set forth
in Section 10.1 of the Plan. This Amendment is effective as of the date specified below. 
 Effective with respect to
Compensation paid, and deferrals and Matching Contributions made, on or after February 4, 2011, the Adoption Agreement (as previously modified in the First Amendment to this Plan) is amended by revising the Attachment to
Section 5.01(a) to read as follows: 
 “Matching Contributions will be credited to eligible Participants each pay
period based on a formula equal to the excess of the amount determined in (a) below, less the amount determined in (b) below: 
 (a) An amount equal to the lesser of (i) $0.50 for each $1.00 of the eligible Participant’s Compensation subject to deferral under the Plan for such pay period, and (ii) 2.50% of the
eligible Participant’s Compensation for such pay period. 
 (b) The amount of Matching Contributions (as defined in the
Ingram Micro 401(k) Investment Savings Plan) made on behalf of the Participant under the Ingram Micro 401(k) Investment Savings Plan for such pay period. 
 For purposes of calculating Matching Contributions under section 5.01 of the Adoption Agreement only, a Participant’s Compensation shall be the definition as set forth in Section 3.01(b) of the
Adoption Agreement, but excluding the Annual Incentive Bonus, and the voluntary or involuntary cash-out payments made under the employer’s Paid Time Off Policy.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment is executed on the date set forth below. 
  

			
	INGRAM MICRO INC.
		
	By:	 	 Robyn Tingley

		
	Title:	 	 Vice President, Human Resources, Americas

		
	Date:	 	 December 15, 2011
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. § 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SulphCo, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Larry D.
Ryan, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, and
Stanley W. Farmer, Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer, and Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Larry D. RyanName:
        Larry D. RyanTitle:    
      Chief Executive OfficerDate:November 9, 2010/s/ Stanley W. FarmerName:  
      Stanley W. FarmerTitle:   
       Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Corporate
Secretary
 Date:   
 November 9, 2010
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to
SulphCo, Inc. and will be retained by SulphCo, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# L_2004358EN.01000901.xml

| 3.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 358/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 358/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2072/2004

of 2 December 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004 of 3 September 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden for the 2004/2005 marketing year (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria, Norway, Romania and Switzerland was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 26 November to 2 December 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1565/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 3.

3

---
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-24 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Legacy effects of wildfire on stream thermal regimes and rainbow trout ecology: an integrated analysis of observation and individual-based models      

      September 10, 2015    

Management of aquatic resources in fire-prone areas requires understanding of fish species’ responses to wildfire and of the intermediate- and long-term consequences of these disturbances. We examined Rainbow Trout populations in 9 headwater streams 10 y after a major wildfire: 3 with no history of severe wildfire in the watershed (unburned), 3 in severely burned watersheds (burned), and 3 in severely burned watersheds subjected to immediate events that scoured the stream channel and eliminated streamside vegetation (burned and reorganized). Results of a previous study of this system suggested the primary lasting effects of this wildfire history on headwater stream habitat were differences in canopy cover and solar radiation, which led to higher summer stream temperatures. Nevertheless, trout were present throughout streams in burned watersheds. Older age classes were least abundant in streams draining watersheds with a burned and reorganized history, and individuals >1 y old were most abundant in streams draining watersheds with an unburned history. Burned history corresponded with fast growth, low lipid content, and early maturity of Rainbow Trout. We used an individual-based model of Rainbow Trout growth and demographic patterns to determine if temperature interactions with bioenergetics and competition among individuals could lead to observed phenotypic and ecological differences among populations in the absence of other plausible mechanisms. Modeling suggested that moderate warming associated with wildfire and channel disturbance history leads to faster individual growth, which exacerbates competition for limited food, leading to decreases in population densities. The inferred mechanisms from this modeling exercise suggest the transferability of ecological patterns to a variety of temperature-warming scenarios.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Amanda Rosenberger, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Cooperative Research Units

arosenberger@usgs.gov

573-882-9653

## Related Content

#### Amanda Rosenberger, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Cooperative Research Units

arosenberger@usgs.gov

573-882-9653

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Boise River
                  -  Boise National Forest
                  - Idaho

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Books 

#           Landscapes of West Africa: A window on a changing world      

      June 8, 2016    

View Report

View Report - French

Our global ecosystem is and has always been complex, dynamic, and in constant flux. Science tells us how natural forces of enormous power have shaped and reshaped Earth’s surface, atmosphere, climate, and biota again and again since the planet’s beginnings about 4.5 billion years ago. For most of the planet’s history those environmental changes were the result of the interaction of natural processes such as geology and climate and were described on the geological time scale in epochs spanning millions of years.

When humankind appeared on Earth around 200,000 years ago the influence of human activity on the environment must have been small and localized. The influence of scattered small groups of people on the global ecosystem would have been overwhelmed by the forces of natural systems (Steffen and others, 207). Human population would not grow to 50 million (about 0.7 percent of the Earth’s current population) for another 197,000 years. Population growth accelerated over the centuries that followed until the planet was adding more than that 50 million people every year. Our planet is now home to roughly 7.3 billion people and we are adding 1 million more people roughly every 4.8 days (US Census Bureau, 2011). Before 1950, no one on Earth had lived through a doubling of the human population, but now some people have experienced a tripling in their lifetime (Cohen, 2003).

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### William Matthew Cushing

##### Geographer - GIS Analyst

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

mcushing@usgs.gov

605-594-2766

## Related Content

#### William Matthew Cushing

##### Geographer - GIS Analyst

Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

mcushing@usgs.gov

605-594-2766

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - West Africa

View All **
SUN 'N LAKE OF SEBRING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, Appellant, v. Zenon AYALA and Lucy Ayala, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2440

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 5, 2018

Donovan A. Roper of Roper & Roper, P.A., Apopka, for Appellant.

Michael J. Schlesinger ; Joshua B. Bochner and Andrew S. Genden of Schlesinger & Associates, P.A., Miami, for Appellees.

LUCAS, Judge.

Finding no merit in the arguments raised by Sun 'N Lake of Sebring Improvement District in this appeal, we are bound to affirm. We write, however, to correct an apparent misconception held by the parties and the court below. The Improvement District has posited-and Mr. and Mrs. Ayala and the trial court seem to agree-that the issue of whether sovereign immunity bars a claim arising under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, §§ 501.201-.23, Fla. Stat. (2016), against a state agency or subdivision is a matter of first impression in Florida.1 But that is incorrect. *See**Curcio v. Fla. Dep't of the Lottery*, 164 So.3d 750, 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ("[A]lthough sovereign immunity has been waived for breach of contract claims against the State and its agencies, *573sovereign immunity has not been waived for the unfair and deceptive trade practices and misleading advertising claims asserted by Appellant. These claims are not common law tort claims subject to the waiver of sovereign immunity in section 768.28, Florida Statutes ; they are statutory claims arising under part II of chapter 501 ... and section 817.41 ... respectively. Neither of those statutes contains a clear and unequivocal waiver of the State's sovereign immunity ...." (citation omitted)); *cf.**Delgado v. J.W. Courtesy Pontiac GMC-Truck, Inc.*, 693 So.2d 602, 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (explaining that "FDUPTA constitutes a substantive law" and "represents a statutory manifestation of a legislative policy decision that the consuming public is entitled to expanded remedies for recovering economic losses suffered as a consequence of deceptive and unfair trade practices and acts"). The parties have not argued the applicability or persuasiveness of *Curcio* or *Delgado*, either on appeal or in the proceedings below. Accordingly, we affirm without consideration of those cases.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

1

From that shared assumption, the arguments in this appeal revolved almost entirely around whether the nature of a Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUPTA) claim could be likened to an "intentional tort."
Dallas WOODSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0961

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10811]




Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 1995 / 
Corrections

[[Page 41157]]


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 30 and 150

[CGD 95-900]
RIN 2115-AF07


Bulk Hazardous Materials; Correction

Correction

    In rule document 95-18764 beginning on page 39267 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 2, 1995, and corrected in the issue of Monday, August 
7, 1995, further corrections are being made as follows:
    1. On page 39267, in the second column, in paragraph 3., in the 
second line, after ``column,'' insert ``first line,''.
    2. On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph 6., in the 
correction to paragraph s., the fifth line should read ``Poly(2-
8)alkylene glycol monoalkyl (C1-''.
    3. On the same page, in the third column:
    a. In the second line from the top, ``removed'' should read 
``moved''.
    b. In paragraph 11., in the third line, ``pathalates'' should read 
``phthalates''.
    c. In paragraph 12., in the 6th line, ``Tetrapropylbenzene'' was 
misspelled; in the 7th line, ``Alkly(69+)benzens'' should read 
``Alkyl(C9+) benzenes''; and in the 13th line, ``phosphate'' was 
misspelled.
    d. In paragraph 14., in the first entry, in the first line, 
``Bromochlorone-thane'' should read ``Bromochlorome-thane''.
    d. In paragraph 14., in the fourth entry, the fourth line, should 
read ``Methoxy-1-methyl ethyl)-2-ethyl-6-''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 217 (Thursday, November 9, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 56639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-21109]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ACE-10]


Proposed Amendment to Class E Airspace; Omaha, Millard Airport, 
NE

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-26762 beginning on page 55223 in the 
issue of Monday, October 30, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 55223, in the third column, in the Dates section, the date 
is corrected to read ``December 11, 1995''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D