alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.6

                          STOCKHOLDER LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


February 10, 2000.

BROWSESAFE.COM, INC..
335 West 9th Street, Suite 100
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-3003
Attention: Mark Smith

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the terms of a Letter of Agreement dated as of February 10, 2000
(the "Agreement") between California Applied Research, Inc. (the "undersigned")
and BROWSESAFE.COM, INC. (the "Company"), the undersigned, upon exercise of
warrants, will receive up to 550,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value
per share, of the Company (the "Shares") that are subject to a Registration
Rights Agreement.

In order to induce the Company to enter into the Letter of Agreement, the
undersigned hereby agrees as follows:

        1. After registration, the undersigned will not sell, offer to sell,
contract to sell, sell any option or contract for the sale or purchase of, lend,
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another any of the
economic consequences of ownership of, or otherwise dispose of (collectively,
"transfer") the Shares except as follows: up to 1/3 of the shares may be sold
immediately; an additional 1/3 of the shares may be sold within ninety (90); and
the remaining 1/3 of the shares may be sold within one hundred and eighty (180)
days. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if the undersigned is a
corporation, partnership or limited liability company, the undersigned shall not
be restricted from distributing any or all of the Shares to its shareholders,
partners or members and the subsequent Transfers of Shares by such shareholders,
partners or members.

        2. The undersigned acknowledges that the Company may impose stock
transfer restrictions on the Shares to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.

        3. This restriction shall terminate on February 10, 2001.

Very truly yours,


  /S/
----------------------------------------
Michael Mercier. (the "Undersigned ")


AGREED TO:
BROWSESAFE.COM, INC. (the "Company")

By:  /S/
     -----------------------------------

Dated as of February 10, 2000.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - FIC Investments USA Corp. - Exhibit 10.13






ADDITION #1 TO THE 
DECLARATION OF TRUST AND
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION

WHEREAS FIC INVESTMENTS USA CORP. (“FIC-USA”) entered
into an Offer to Purchase (the “Offer”) dated November 15, 2006 with Stony Plain
Estates Ltd. (“Stony Plain”) for the purchase of certain real estate property
(the “Property”) located in the Province of Alberta;

AND WHEREAS FIC-USA entered into the Offer as agent on
behalf of GENESIS ON THE LAKES LTD. (“Genesis”) and, pursuant to an Agency
Agreement between FIC-USA and Genesis dated November 15, 2006, Genesis is the
legal and beneficial owner of the property;

AND WHEREAS the parties have contributed funds to
Genesis for the purpose of acquiring the Property;

AND WHEREAS the parties hereto wish to set out their
respective financial condition to Genesis and their respective interest in the
Property, including any profits derived from the sale or development of the
Property.

AND WHEREAS in Declaration of Trust and Acknowledgement
of Contribution Agreement, the Contributors were acknowledged for making the
following Principal Contribution:

- $2,365,000 contributed by FIC
Investments USA Corp. representing 50.0% of the Principal; 
- $1,182,500
contributed by FIC Investment Ltd, representing 25.0% of the Principal; 
-
$591,250 contributed by WBIC Canada Ltd. representing 12.5% of the Principal;
and 
- $591,250 contributed by FIC S.E. Asia Fund Ltd., representing 12.5% of
the Principal.

(FIC-USA, FIC, WBIC and FIC SEA are collectively referred to as
the “Contributors”)

NOW THEREFORE the following are the updated Principal
Contributions now being acknowledged as of the date of this document:

- $3,071,250 contributed by FIC-USA
representing 50.3% of the Principal;
- $1,846,250 contributed by FIC
Investment Ltd, representing 30.3% of the Principal; 
- $591,250 contributed
by WBIC Canada Ltd. representing 9.7% of the Principal; and 
- $591,250
contributed by FIC S.E. Asia Fund Ltd., representing 9.7% of the Principal.

(FIC-USA, FIC, WBIC and FIC SEA are
collectively referred to as the “Contributors”)

Any of the Principal Contributions amounts that have been
changed as a result of this document are deemed to have changed on the date of
this document.




- 2 -

	 Dated this 1st day of August 2007.
      
	 
	 	 
	 GENESIS ON THE LAKES LTD. 
	 
	 	 	 
	 Per: 
	 /s/
        Signed 
	 
		  Authorized Signatory  
	 
	 FIC INVESTMENT LTD. 
	 
	 	 	 
	 Per: 
	 /s/
        Earle Pasquill 
	 
		  Authorized Signatory  
	 
	 	 
	 FIC INVESTMENTS USA CORP. 
	 
	 	 	 
	 Per: 
	 /s/
        Earle Pasquill 
	 
		  Authorized Signatory  
	 
	 	 
	 WBIC CANADA LTD. 
	 
	 	 	 
	 Per: 
	 /s/
        Earle Pasquill 
	 
		  Authorized Signatory  
	 
	 	 
	 FIC S.E. ASIA FUND LTD. 
	 
	 	 	 
	 Per: 
	 /s/
        Earle Pasquill 
	 
		  Authorized Signatory
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 

2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00827-CR

STACY MERSADEZ SILVA, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2133361 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Stacy Mersadez Silva, through her appointed counsel, has filed a 

written motion to withdraw her notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. The 

motion is signed by both appellant and counsel. Because this court has not delivered 

an opinion, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Donovan, and Wise 

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-138297, of China Direct, Inc. and the
related prospectuses of our audit report dated March 9, 2007 with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 and the consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows of China Direct, Inc. and its
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006 appearing in the Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Boca Raton, Florida
April 2, 2007
Vista International Technologies, Inc. 10-Q








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vista International Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 VISTA INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:  November 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Thomas P. PfistererThomas P. PfistererChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0354 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-072-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350B, BA, B1, B2, B3, D, AS355E, F, F1, F2, 

and N Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 72 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent reduced yaw control and subsequent loss 

of helicopter control.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $161 

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the 

inspection/installation)

$85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $246 

Total US Fleet Cost $17,712

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
# C ou r t

of A p p e al s

of t h e S t at e of

G e or gi a

A

T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s h e r e b y p a s s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g o r d e r :

A 1 9 A 1 5 2 1

. A

N T O I N E v

. A

N T O I N E

.

T h i s c a s e w a s d o c k e t e d b y t h i s C o u r t o n F e b r u a r y 2 8

, 2 0 1 9

. A

p p e l l a n t ’ s b r i e f

a n d e n u m e r a t i o n s o f e r r o r w e r e d

u e o n M a r c h 2 0

, 2 0 1 9

. A

s o f t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

, A p p e l l a n t h a s n o t f

i l e d a b r i e f a n d e n u m e r a t i o n s o f e r r o r a n d h a s n o t r e q

u e s t e d a n

e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e i n w h i c h t o d o s o

. A c c o r d i n g l y

, t h i s a p p e a l i s h e r e b y D I S M I S S E D a s a b a n d o n e d p u

r s u a n t t o

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s R u l e s 1 3 a n d 2 3

.

C

o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’s O f f i c e

, At l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i

s a t r u e e

x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w

r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 25, 2019

03/25/2019
Alexander GUICE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ON BEHALF OF Pamela LEE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4857

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.

Denied.
In re Le Jardin House, LLC 

United States Bankruptcy Court 

Southern District of Florida 

Debtor(s) 

Case No. 

Chapter 11 

Septaria Management LLC owns 45% of Le Jardin Member LLC

1150 102nd St 

Miami Beach, FL 33154 

□ None [Check ifapplicable]

July 17, 2019 

Date 

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2018 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com 

Brett Lieberman 

Signature of orney or Litigant 

Counsel for Le Jardin House, LLC

Edelboim Lieberman Revah Oshinsky PLLC 

20200 W Dixie Highway 

Ste 905 

Miami, FL 33180 

305-768-9909 Fax:305-928-1114

Brett@elrolaw.com

Best Case Bankruptcy 

1150 102nd Street, Office

Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154

19-19182-RAM

CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT (RULE 7007.1) 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7007.1 and to enable the Judges to evaluate possible disqualification or 

recusal, the undersigned counsel for Le Jardin House, LLC in the above captioned action, certifies that the following is

a (are) corporation(s), other than the debtor or a governmental unit, that directly or indirectly own(s) l 0% or more of any 

class of the corporation's(s') equity interests, or states that there are no entities to report under FRBP 7007.1: 

Bay Harbor Development LLC owns 50% of Le Jardin Member LLC

1209 Orange Street

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Le Jardin Member, LLC owns 100% of Debtor 

Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 9 Filed 07/17/19 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, June 25, 2009, Friday, June 26, 2009, and Saturday, June 27, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Issue Committee will be held Thursday, June 25, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Friday, June 26, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Saturday, June 27, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Mountain Time in Denver, CO. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-9878 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Modeling golden eagle‐vehicle collisions to design mitigation strategies      

      August 16, 2018    

The incidental take of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) as a result of wind energy development requires some form of compensatory mitigation. Although several options have been proposed, only one has been formerly accepted and implemented, and the lack of options can limit the permit process for wind facilities. We developed a model to estimate numbers of golden eagles that die when struck by vehicles when eagles scavenge road kill to evaluate removal of road‐killed carcasses as an additional mitigation option. Our model estimates vehicle collision rates as a function of eagle densities, road traffic volume, and animal carcass abundance at the scale of a Wyoming, USA, county during fall‐winter, and quantifies the effects of different mitigation strategies, including estimates of uncertainty. We evaluated the plausibility of our model estimates by predicting mortality rates for each county in Wyoming and comparing overall state mortality to current estimates of mortality using derived estimates from expert judgment. We also developed a context‐dependent analysis of potential mitigation credits controlling for carcass number, traffic volume, and background carcass removals. We found that mitigation credit should be highest in areas with greatest number of carcasses. Collision mitigation is a potentially useful addition to the mitigation toolbox for wind energy development or other activities that need to offset predicted golden eagle mortality and satisfy incidental take permit requirements. 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Clint Boal, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

cboal@usgs.gov

806-834-6536

## Related Content

#### Clint Boal, PhD

##### Research Wildlife Biologist

Cooperative Research Units

cboal@usgs.gov

806-834-6536

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Wyoming

View All **
CGFD44 (4/23/19)

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 5, 2021

Laurel M Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−23789−LMI

Chapter: 13

In re: (Debtor(s) name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, and trade)

Edda Fiorella Torres Poletti De Melendez

14134 SW 100 Ter

Miami, FL 33186

SSN: xxx−xx−7615

ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO TRUSTEE'S REPORT OF

NON−COMPLIANCE BY DEBTOR WITH POST CONFIRMATION PLAN

 As provided under Local Rule 3070−1(C)(2)(c), a Report of Non−Compliance by Debtor with Plan

Payments has been filed by the trustee in this case indicating that the debtor was served by the trustee

with a notice of delinquency which established a deadline for the debtor to become current with plan

payments and that the debtor has failed to meet this deadline.

 Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

Page 1 of 2

Case 19-23789-LMI Doc 54 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
1. This case is dismissed.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot.

3. The trustee shall file a final report prior to the administrative closing of the case.

4. (If applicable) the debtor shall immediately pay to the Clerk, U.S. Court, C. Clyde Atkins United

States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 150, Miami, FL 33128, $0.00 for the

balance of the filing fee as required by Local Rule 1017−2(E). Any funds remaining with the

trustee shall be applied to this balance and the trustee must dispose of any funds in

accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Local Rule 1017−2(F), unless otherwise ordered by

the court. The court will not entertain a motion for reconsideration of this order unless all

unpaid fees are paid at the time the motion is filed.

5. A motion to rehear, reconsider, or reinstate a dismissed case must be filed in accordance with

the requirements of Local Rule 9013−1(E).

6. In accordance with Local Rule 1002−1(B)(1), the clerk of court is directed to refuse to accept

for filing any future voluntary petitions submitted by this debtor if the refiling violates a prior

order of the court or if the petition is accompanied by an Application to Pay Filing Fee in

Installments and filing fees remain due from any previous case filed by the debtor.

The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order on all parties of record.

# # # 

Page 2 of 2

Case 19-23789-LMI Doc 54 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
24




POWER
OF ATTORNEY




The
undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint Peter A. Michel and/or
Lincoln Zehr as his lawful agent and attorney-in-fact solely for the purpose of
executing and filing all reports on Form 10-K relating to the year ended
December 31, 2008, and any amendments thereto, required to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by iSecureTrac Corp.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the
22nd day of February, 2009.




/s/  Joseph A.
      EthridgeJoseph
      A. Ethridge




POWER
OF ATTORNEY




The
undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint Peter A. Michel and/or
Lincoln Zehr as his lawful agent and attorney-in-fact solely for the purpose of
executing and filing all reports on Form 10-K relating to the year ended
December 31, 2008, and any amendments thereto, required to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by iSecureTrac Corp.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the
23rd
day of February 2009.




/s/  Robert W.
    KorbaRobert
      W. Korba




POWER
OF ATTORNEY




The
undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint Peter A. Michel and/or
Lincoln Zehr as his lawful agent and attorney-in-fact solely for the purpose of
executing and filing all reports on Form 10-K relating to the year ended
December 31, 2008, and any amendments thereto, required to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by iSecureTrac Corp.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the
20th
day of February 2009.





/s/  Ravi NathRavi
      Nath




POWER
OF ATTORNEY




The
undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint Peter A. Michel and/or
Lincoln Zehr as his lawful agent and attorney-in-fact solely for the purpose of
executing and filing all reports on Form 10-K relating to the year ended
December 31, 2008, and any amendments thereto, required to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by iSecureTrac Corp.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the
19th
day of February 2009.




/s/  Roger KanneRoger
      Kanne
John J. WILSON, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2179

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (9,565)
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       (100)
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  31,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,139)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)



</TABLE>
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 62 Filed 04/03/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 62 Filed 04/03/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 62 Filed 04/03/20 Page 3 of 3