alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Pore-pressure sensitivities to dynamic strains: observations in active tectonic regions      

      July 17, 2015    

Triggered seismicity arising from dynamic stresses is often explained by the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, where elevated pore pressures reduce the effective strength of faults in fluid-saturated rock. The seismic response of a fluid-rock system naturally depends on its hydro-mechanical properties, but accurately assessing how pore-fluid pressure responds to applied stress over large scales in situ remains a challenging task; hence, spatial variations in response are not well understood, especially around active faults. Here I analyze previously unutilized records of dynamic strain and pore-pressure from regional and teleseismic earthquakes at Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO) stations from 2006 through 2012 to investigate variations in response along the Pacific/North American tectonic plate boundary. I find robust scaling-response coefficients between excess pore pressure and dynamic strain at each station that are spatially correlated: around the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems, the response is lowest in regions of the crust undergoing the highest rates of secular shear strain. PBO stations in the Parkfield instrument cluster are at comparable distances to the San Andreas fault (SAF), and spatial variations there follow patterns in dextral creep rates along the fault, with the highest response in the actively creeping section, which is consistent with a narrowing zone of strain accumulation seen in geodetic velocity profiles. At stations in the San Juan Bautista (SJB) and Anza instrument clusters, the response depends non-linearly on the inverse fault-perpendicular distance, with the response decreasing towards the fault; the SJB cluster is at the northern transition from creeping-to-locked behavior along the SAF, where creep rates are at moderate to low levels, and the Anza cluster is around the San Jacinto fault, where to date there have been no statistically significant creep rates observed at the surface. These results suggest that the strength of the pore pressure response in fluid-saturated rock near active faults is controlled by shear strain accumulation associated with tectonic loading, which implies a strong feedback between fault strength and permeability: dynamic triggering susceptibilities may vary in space and also in time.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Andrew J Barbour, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

abarbour@usgs.gov

650-439-2803

## Related Content

#### Andrew J Barbour, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

abarbour@usgs.gov

650-439-2803

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States
# L_2004373EN.01002001.xml

| 21.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 373/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 373/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2189/2004

of 20 December 2004

fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2005 accounting year of the farm accountancy data network

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 of 13 July 1983 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings (2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm return forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm return forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation.

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 134/2004 (3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2004 accounting year at EUR 140 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the cost of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 134/2004 (3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2004 accounting year at EUR 140 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the cost of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard fee provided for in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 shall be fixed at EUR 142.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply for the 2005 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004 (OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 97).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 190, 14.7.1983, p. 25. Regulation amended by Regulation (EC) No 1388/2004 (OJ L 255, 31.7.2004, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 21, 28.1.2004, p. 8.

3

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 26482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-80517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Delays in 
Processing of Exemption Applications

Correction

    In notice document 95-11616 beginning on page 25260 in the issue of 
Thursday, May 11, 1994, make the following corrections:
    On page 25261, in the table, in the first column, Application 
numbers ``10012-N'', ``10022-N'' and ``10098-N'' should read ``11012-
N'', `11022-N'' and ``11098-N'' respectively.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30214]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 20-10233-EPK Doc 33 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 20-10233-EPK Doc 33 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-10233-EPK Doc 33 Filed 04/20/20 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

DIGIMARC CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Digimarc Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, E.K. Ranjit, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

|Date: March 15, 2004 |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|By:                  |  | /s/E.K. RANJITE.K. Ranjit Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103239, 333-63010,333-50528, 333-35416, 333-93037, 333-108918 and 333-121117) of Agile Software Corporation of our report dated July 13, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated July 13, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

San Jose, California 

July 13, 2005
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           A model of Precambrian geology of Kansas derived from gravity and magnetic data      

      January 1, 1996    

The fabric of the Precambrian geology of Kansas is revealed through inversion of gravity and magnetic data to pseudo-lithology. There are five main steps in the inversion process: (1) reduction of potential-field data to a horizontal plane in the wavenumber domain; (2) separation of the residual anomaly of interest from the regional background, where an assumption is made that the regional anomaly could be represented by some order of polynomial; (3) subtraction of the signal due to the known topography on the Phanerozoic/Precambrian boundary from the residual anomaly (we assume what is left at this stage are the signals due to lateral variation in the Precambrian lithology); (4) inversion of the residual anomaly in the wavenumber domain to density and magnetization distribution in the top part of the Precambrian constrained by the known geologic information; (5) derivation of pseudo-lithology by characterization of density and magnetization. The boundary between the older Central Plains Province to the north and the Southern Granite-Rhyolite Province to the south is clearly delineated. The Midcontinent Rift System appears to widen in central Kansas and involve a considerable portion of southern Kansas. Lithologies in southwestern Kansas appear to change over fairly small areas and include mafic rocks which have not been encountered in drill holes. The texture of the potential field data from southwestern Kansas suggests a history of continental growth by broad extension. Copyright ?? 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

## Citation Information
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 18423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10411]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 14, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 13780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-110314]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 611, 675, and 676

[Docket No. 950206040-5040-01; I.D. 111494A]


Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands; 
Foreign Fishing; Limited Access Management of Federal Fisheries In and 
Off of Alaska; Final 1995 Harvest Specifications of Groundfish

Correction

    In rule document 95-3485 beginning on page 8479, in the issue of 
Tuesday, February 14, 1995, make the following corrections:
    1.On page 8481, in the first column, in the first paragraph, after 
the word ``below'' insert a period.
    2.On the same page, in the 2nd column, in the 21st line from the 
top, after the word ``specifications'' insert ``(Table 1)''.
    3.On page 8482, in the third column, in the table, under the 
heading entitled ``Roe season\4\'', in the eighth line, ``552 (\6\)'' 
should read ``552''.
    4.On page 8484, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in the 
first line from the bottom, after the word ``mortality'' insert a 
period.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 31351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30614]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[WT Docket No. 95-69 FCC 95-202]


Auctionable Services

Correction

    In proposed rule document 95-12462 beginning on page 26860 in the 
issue of Friday, May 19, 1995 make the following correction:
    On page 26860, in the third column, under Dates:, in the last line, 
``June 6, 1995.'' should read ``June 5, 1995.''

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Model behavior and sensitivity in an application of the cohesive bed component of the community sediment transport modeling system for the York River estuary, VA, USA      

      May 1, 2014    

The Community Sediment Transport Modeling System (CSTMS) cohesive bed sub-model that accounts for erosion, deposition, consolidation, and swelling was implemented in a three-dimensional domain to represent the York River estuary, Virginia. The objectives of this paper are to (1) describe the application of the three-dimensional hydrodynamic York Cohesive Bed Model, (2) compare calculations to observations, and (3) investigate sensitivities of the cohesive bed sub-model to user-defined parameters.** **Model results for summer 2007 showed good agreement with tidal-phase averaged estimates of sediment concentration, bed stress, and current velocity derived from Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) field measurements. An important step in implementing the cohesive bed model was specification of both the initial and equilibrium critical shear stress profiles, in addition to choosing other parameters like the consolidation and swelling timescales. This model promises to be a useful tool for investigating the fundamental controls on bed erodibility and settling velocity in the York River, a classical muddy estuary, provided that appropriate data exists to inform the choice of model parameters.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Christopher Sherwood, PhD

##### Research Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

csherwood@usgs.gov

508-457-2269

## Related Content

#### Christopher Sherwood, PhD

##### Research Oceanographer

Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

csherwood@usgs.gov

508-457-2269

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center

384 Woods Hole Rd.Woods Hole, MA02543United States

508-548-8700

508-457-2310

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - York River Estuary
                  - Virginia

View All **
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Optio Software,Inc. (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Caroline Bembry, Chief Financial Officer (principalfinancial and accounting officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1).  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2).  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: December 10, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Caroline Bembry     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Caroline Bembry         |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification accompanies the quarterly report pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, nor shall it be deemed to be a separate disclosure document.

 

----
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

35111

Vol. 60, No. 128

Wednesday, July 5, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

RIN 1810-AA79

34 CFR Part 263

Indian Fellowship and Professional

Development Programs

Correction

In final rule document 95–15655,

pages 33295 through 33298 in the issue

of Tuesday, June 27, 1995, should be

removed.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

[INS No. 1726-95]

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement

(DEIS) and Scoping Meeting

Correction

In notice document 95–15302

appearing on page 32563, in the issue of

Thursday, June 22, 1995, make the

following correction:

On page 32563, in the second column,

under SUMMARY:, in the 4th paragraph,

in the 10th line, ‘‘10 beds’’ should read

‘‘100 beds’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,988,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  637,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,592,844
<PP&E>                                       1,821,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,546,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,662,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,130,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,546,700
<SALES>                                     11,780,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,780,822
<CGS>                                       10,609,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,609,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,040,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (845,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (845,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (845,083)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

43840

Vol. 60, No. 163

Wednesday, August 23, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for

Public and Indian Housing

24 CFR Part 982

[Docket No. R–95–1628; FR–2294–F–02]

RIN 2577–AB14

Section 8 Certificate and Voucher

Programs Conforming Rule

Correction

In rule document 95–15906 beginning

on page 34660 in the issue of Monday,

July 3, 1995, make the following

correction:

§ 982.163 [Corrected]

On page 34702, in the first column, in

the section heading, ‘‘§ 982 Fraud

recoveries.’’ should read ‘‘§ 982.163

Fraud recoveries.’’

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-026-05-1430-01; AZA-7489]

Arizona: Termination of Classification

and Opening of Lands to Entry in

Maricopa County, Arizona

Correction

In notice document 95–18426

appearing on page 38569 in the issue of

Thursday, July 27, 1995, make the

following correction:

On the same page, in the second

column, under the heading ‘‘Gila and

Salt River Meridian, Arizona’’, in the

land description, the coordinate

‘‘S1⁄2,SE1⁄4SE1⁄4NW1⁄4’’ should read

‘‘S1⁄2SE1⁄4SE1⁄4NW1⁄4’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3119 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on disperse red 60. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on disperse 

red 60. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 60. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 disperse red 60) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3119 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS