alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A TTORNEY S FOR A PPELLANT A TTORNEY FOR A PPELLEE

Thomas M. Beeman Donald K. McClellan

Alexander M. Beeman McClellan & McClellan

Beeman Law Muncie, Indiana

Anderson, Indiana

______________________________________________________________________________



# In the

Indiana Supreme Court

_________________________________

No. 18 S 02

- 1708

- PL

- 554

M ICHAEL R. P ILKINGTON

, Appellant ( Plaint i ff b elow)

,

v.

K AREN A. P ILKINGTON

, Appellee ( Defendant b elow )

.

_________________________________

Appeal from the Delaware Circuit Court , No. 18C05

- 1510

- PL

- 24

The Honorable Thom a s A. Cannon, Jr.

_________________________________

On Petition t o Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 18A02

- 1605

- PL

- 1086

_________________________________

August 30 , 2017

Per Curiam.

Michael Pilkington f

iled a complaint against his stepmother, Karen Pilkington

, alleging

she violated her duties as the trustee of a trust created by Michael’s deceased father . The trust

contained the father’s interest in multiple limited liability companies (“LLCs”)

. Karen contends

Michael has no interest in the trust because he fi led for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and

, at the trustee’s2

reques t

, sold Karen his interest in the LLCs. Michael contends he sold Karen only his present

ownership interest in the LLCs, not his remainder interest in the trust.

Karen filed a motion to dismis s the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

,

arguing the bankruptcy court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine what interest Michael sold.

T he trial court dismissed Michael’s complaint with prejudice. The Court of Appeals reversed and

rema nded

, holding the trial court ha s subject matter jurisdiction to determine what interest Michael

sold to Karen in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding. Pilkington v. Pilkington , 71 N.E.3d 865

(Ind. Ct. App. 2017).

We agree with Senior Judge Shepard’s analysis and the result reached by the Court of

Appeals. Accordingly, we grant transfer , adopt and incorporate by reference the Court of Appeals

opinion in accordanc e with Indiana Appellate Rule 58(A)(1), reverse the t rial court , and remand

.

All Justices concur.
Travis D. SIMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI<R E c E I v ED 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. NOV 2 4 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

JAMES KEARNS 

Respondent. 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0683 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA Case No. 2012S0275132 

AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby files its amendment to 

its Complaint issued September 15, 2014, pursuant to Rule 214(b)(1) of the Rules of Practice (14 

C.F.R. §13.214(b)(1), and states as follows: 

11. (a) Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Sections 46301(a)-(d), Respondent is subject to a civil 

penalty not to exceed $1, 100 for each of the violations alleged; and 

(b) Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §46318(a), Respondent is subject to a civil penalty not to 

exceed $25,000 for each of the violations alleged. 

Respectfully submitted this 19th day ofNovember 2014. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Amendment to Complaint has been sent this date by 

the following methods: 

original and one copy via certified mail: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

one copy via certified mail and facsimile: 

Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

(FAX) (202) 366-7536 

One copy via certified mail only: 

James Kearns 

270 Union Street, Apt. 2 

Brooklyn, NY 11231 

Leg st t 

Office of the egional Counsel 

IQH1l9 

Dated
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9992]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0296]


Security Zone; Portland Rose Festival on Willamette River

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the Portland Rose Festival 
Security Zone on the Willamette River from 1 p.m. on June 3, 2009, 
until 10 a.m. June 8, 2009. This action is necessary to ensure the 
safety and security of maritime traffic, including the public vessels 
present, on the Willamette River during the Portland Rose Festival. 
During the enforcement period, entry into the security zone detailed in 
33 CFR 165.1312 is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Portland or his designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1312 will be enforced from 1 p.m. 
on June 3, 2009, through 10 a.m. on June 8, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice, 
call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast 
Guard Sector Portland; telephone 503-240-9319, e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#743e151d19115a355a27150d11060734010717135a191d18"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b210a02060e452a45380a120e19182b1e18080c45060207">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the security 
zone for the Portland Rose Festival detailed in 33 CFR 165.1312 from 1 
p.m. on June 3, 2009, until 10 a.m. on June 8, 2009.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1312, entry into the zone 
established by that section is prohibited unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port Portland or his designated representative. 
Spectator vessels may transit outside the security zone but may not 
anchor, block, loiter in, or impede the transit of ship parade 
participants or official patrol vessels. The Coast Guard may be 
assisted by other Federal, State or local law enforcement agencies in 
enforcing this regulation.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1312 and 5 
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the 
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with notification of 
this enforcement period via Local Notice to Mariners and marine 
information broadcasts.

    Dated: April 16, 2009.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Portland.
[FR Doc. E9-9992 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 19-24332-SMG Doc 27 Filed 01/18/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-24332-SMG Doc 27 Filed 01/18/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-24332-SMG Doc 27 Filed 01/18/20 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the annual report of Greystone Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William W. Rahhal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 September 16, 2011
/s/ William W. Rahhal
 William W. Rahhal

Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mercury exposure of tidal marsh songbirds in the northeastern United States and its association with nest survival      

      November 16, 2021    

The biogeochemistry of tidal marsh sediments facilitates the transformation of mercury (Hg) into the biologically available form methylmercury (MeHg), resulting in elevated Hg exposures to tidal marsh wildlife. Saltmarsh and Acadian Nelson’s sparrows (Ammospiza caudacutua and A. nelsoni subvirgatus, respectively) exclusively inhabit tidal marshes, potentially experiencing elevated risk to Hg exposure, and have experienced range-wide population declines. To characterize spatial and temporal variation of Hg exposure in these species, we sampled total mercury (THg) in blood collected from 9 populations spanning 560 km of coastline, including individuals resampled within and among years. Using concurrent nesting studies, we tested whether THg was correlated with nest survival probabilities, an index of fecundity. Blood THg ranged from 0.074–3.373 μg/g ww across 170 samples from 127 individuals. We detected high spatial variability in Hg exposure, observing differences of more than 45-fold across all individuals and 8-fold in mean blood THg among all study plots, including 4-fold between study plots within 4 km. Intraindividual changes in blood Hg exposure did not vary systematically in time but were considerable, varying by up to 2-fold within and among years. Controlling for both species differences and maximum water level, the dominant driver of fecundity in this system, nest survival probability decreased by 10% across the full range of female blood THg concentrations observed. We conclude that Hg has the potential to impair songbird reproduction, potentially exacerbating known climate-change driven population declines from sea-level rise in saltmarsh and Acadian Nelson’s sparrows.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Garth Herring

##### Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

gherring@usgs.gov

541-750-0952

#### Collin Eagles-Smith

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

ceagles-smith@usgs.gov

541-750-0949

## Related Content

#### Garth Herring

##### Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

gherring@usgs.gov

541-750-0952

#### Collin Eagles-Smith

##### Supervisory Research Ecologist

Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center

ceagles-smith@usgs.gov

541-750-0949

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC) Headquarters          

777 NW 9th StSuite 400Corvallis, OR97330United States

fresc_outreach@usgs.gov

541-750-1030

541-750-1069

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Maine
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  New Jersey

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Late Quaternary loess and soils on uplands in the Canyonlands and Mesa Verde areas, Utah and Colorado      

      May 1, 2018    

Thin loess deposits on the uplands of the southeastern Colorado Plateau have previously not been well studied. We sampled deposits and soils from trenches on Hatch Point (HP) mesa near Canyonlands National Park, Utah, and from two outcrops in Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. At HP, the oldest buried unit yielded 2 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages of 10,370 and 7555 yr; the middle unit yielded 10 OSL ages from 6220 to 1385 yr; and the youngest unit had a single age of 1740 yr. At Mesa Verde (MV), three loess units are preserved in the two outcrops we examined; 6 OSL ages range from 51 to 17 ka. At least one buried soil is present between two units with ages of about 50 and 40 ka. The ages of the loess units in both study areas correspond well with OSL-dated dune sands in Canyonlands National Park and with dune sands on Black Mesa, Arizona. Particle-size distribution combined with chemical and magnetic data indicate that HP loess was derived mostly from nearby sandstone sources with a small component of far-traveled atmospheric dust, whereas MV loess was sourced both from the nearby sandstone and the San Juan River and its tributaries.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Marith Reheis

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

mreheis@usgs.gov

303-236-1270

#### Harland Goldstein

##### Deputy Center Director

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

hgoldstein@usgs.gov

303-236-5506

#### Richard L Reynolds

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

rreynolds@usgs.gov

303-236-1303

#### Shannon Mahan

##### Research Geologist, TRIGA Reactor System Administrator

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

smahan@usgs.gov

303-236-7928

## Related Content

#### Marith Reheis

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

mreheis@usgs.gov

303-236-1270

#### Harland Goldstein

##### Deputy Center Director

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

hgoldstein@usgs.gov

303-236-5506

#### Richard L Reynolds

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

rreynolds@usgs.gov

303-236-1303

#### Shannon Mahan

##### Research Geologist, TRIGA Reactor System Administrator

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

smahan@usgs.gov

303-236-7928

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Canyonlands and Mesa Verde areas
                  - Colorado
                  -  Utah

View All **
SNV_Exhibit 10.34_12.31.2011






Exhibit 10.34


SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Board of Directors Compensation
(Effective January 1, 2012)
 
	
						
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Cash Compensation
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Annual Board Retainer
	 
	$
	40,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Annual Board Committee Member Retainers:
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Audit Committee
	 
	$
	15,000
	

	 

	Compensation Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	Risk Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Annual Committee Chair Retainers:*
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Audit Committee
	 
	$
	15,000
	

	 

	Compensation Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	Risk Committee
	 
	$
	10,000 
	

	 

	Annual Lead Director Retainer
	 
	$
	5,000
	

	 




 
	
			
	 
	 
	 

	*
	 
	Note: The committee chair will receive both an annual committee member retainer and an annual committee chair retainer.






	
						
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Equity Compensation
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	At the discretion of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee - no equity awards were made in 2009, 2010 or 2011.
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Director Stock Purchase Plan
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	Annual maximum company cash contribution per director participant to company-sponsored open market stock purchase plan, with company's contribution equal to 50% of director participant's cash contribution, subject to annual maximum contribution limit by director of $20,000
	 
	$
	10,000
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 3700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-110118]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patents and Trademark Office

37 CFR Part 1

[Docket No. 941120-4320]
RIN 0651-AA76


Changes to Implement 20-year Patent Term and Provisional 
Applications

Correction

    In proposed rule document 94-30312 beginning on page 63951, in the 
issue of Monday, December 12, 1994, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 63952, in the second column, in the first full 
paragraph, in the ninth line, ``expensively'' should read 
``inexpensively''.
    2. On page 63954, in the 1st column, in the 1st full paragraph, in 
the 12th line from the bottom, ``inventory.'' should read ``inventor.''


Sec. 1.62  [Corrected]

    3. On page 63962, in Sec. 1.62(a), in the 13th line, ``file'' 
should read filing''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Caroline Bembry,certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Optio Software, Inc.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that the materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

(b)         intentionallydeleted

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:June 14, 2007
|          | /s/ Caroline Bembry      |   |
|----------|--------------------------|--------|
| * * | *Caroline  Bembry*       |
|     | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E R R A T A

March 7, 2008

Appeal No. 2007-5136, MARANDOLA v. US

Precedential Opinion

Decided: March 6, 2008

Page 2, three lines from the bottom, “Bowels” should be “Bowles.”
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3444 

To require that textile and apparel articles acquired for use by executive 

agencies be manufactured from articles, materials, or supplies entirely 

grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require that textile and apparel articles acquired for use 

by executive agencies be manufactured from articles, materials, or supplies entirely grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wear American Act 

5 of 2012’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3444 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROCURE TEXTILE AND AP2 PAREL ARTICLES MANUFACTURED ENTIRELY 

3 OF DOMESTIC COMPONENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition 

6 Regulation Council shall amend the Federal Acquisition 

7 Regulation to require Federal agencies to procure textiles 

8 and apparel articles, including components for such arti9 cles, that are manufactured in the United States wholly 

10 from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or 

11 manufactured in the United States. The Federal Acquisi12 tion Regulation, as so amended, shall provide that the re13 quirement applicable to textiles and apparel articles is sub14 ject to the same exceptions applicable to other articles, 

15 materials, and supplies under paragraphs (1) and (2) of 

16 section 8302(a) of title 41, United States Code. 

17 (b) TRAINING.—The head of each Federal agency 

18 shall ensure that each member of the acquisition work19 force of the agency who participates substantially in the 

20 agency’s acquisition of textiles and apparel articles on a 

21 regular basis receives training on the requirements imple22 mented pursuant to subsection (a) not later than 180 days 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IM90W 

PORTABLE ICE MAKER 

- - • Up to 261)5 or Ice rneIm'9 cepadty 

• 9 pal or Ia! In 7-15 min IM!I'IIg!. 

• loa ope: SrniI/MIII:IlunV\..ilrge Idat t:ypI! 

• lDI mii!lle 131Bd1¥:2.2 Ills 

• 'MIter storlIge QIPIIdIr. 3.2 L 

• High effIdent tOiliPO :, with Low noise opellrtlon 

• Refrigertllion codl!:l34A 

• PiatP elettloolc allll'Dl with 'hi I..,. 

• TrW( porIiIbII! IcII make~ na pkmblng 

• 1'IMrIIr:12Ov 60Hz 13DW 

• floor I..o!Idlng Qty. (Non-5lp SIlIIet): 2O'I4O'/4O'HQ: 450/930/1115 pes 

• ~ Sheet t.o.dlng Qty. 2O'/'fO'/'f01iQ: 4201900/1068 pDI 

• Unit Dimensions (WxDxH): 11.7" Ie 14.4' Ie 14.9" 

• PacIcIng Dlmaalans (WlcDxH): 13.4" Ie 16.1'1[ 16.9" 

• Net 'iJ . , 4lt/Gro&!I W.,.ot: 29.3fJ2.,2 Ib. 

• UPC#: G-25806 80147-7 

• m appro'ts 

... 

-