alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned, Robert K. Bench the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of CoConnect, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:  1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this October 16, 2012.  /s/ Robert K. Bench Robert K. Bench Principal Financial and Accounting Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CoConnect, Inc. and will be retained by CoConnect, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
II 

Calendar No. 12 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 365 

To make a technical amendment to the Education Sciences Reform Act 

of 2002. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2011 

Mr. HARKIN, from the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on 

the calendar 

A BILL 

To make a technical amendment to the Education Sciences 

Reform Act of 2002. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO EDUCATION 

4 SCIENCES REFORM ACT OF 2002. 

5 Section 174(e)(1)(A) of the Education Sciences Re6 form Act of 2002 (20 U.S.C. 9564(e)(1)(A)) is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘, subject to 1 extension of not more than 

8 12 months, at the Secretary’s discretion, for any contract 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 365 PCS

1 in effect on, or entered into after, January 1, 2011’’ after 

2 ‘‘period’’. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 12 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 365 

A BILL 

To make a technical amendment to the Education 

Sciences Reform Act of 2002. 

FEBRUARY 16, 2011 

Read twice and placed on the calendar 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANGEL FERDINAND GIL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 415 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover Mastcam instruments: Preflight and in-flight calibration, validation, and data archiving      

      September 5, 2017    

The NASA Curiosity rover Mast Camera (Mastcam) system is a pair of fixed-focal length, multispectral, color CCD imagers mounted ~2 m above the surface on the rover's remote sensing mast, along with associated electronics and an onboard calibration target. The left Mastcam (M-34) has a 34 mm focal length, an instantaneous field of view (IFOV) of 0.22 mrad, and a FOV of 20° × 15° over the full 1648 × 1200 pixel span of its Kodak KAI-2020 CCD. The right Mastcam (M-100) has a 100 mm focal length, an IFOV of 0.074 mrad, and a FOV of 6.8° × 5.1° using the same detector. The cameras are separated by 24.2 cm on the mast, allowing stereo images to be obtained at the resolution of the M-34 camera. Each camera has an eight-position filter wheel, enabling it to take Bayer pattern red, green, and blue (RGB) “true color” images, multispectral images in nine additional bands spanning ~400–1100 nm, and images of the Sun in two colors through neutral density-coated filters. An associated Digital Electronics Assembly provides command and data interfaces to the rover, 8 Gb of image storage per camera, 11 bit to 8 bit companding, JPEG compression, and acquisition of high-definition video. Here we describe the preflight and in-flight calibration of Mastcam images, the ways that they are being archived in the NASA Planetary Data System, and the ways that calibration refinements are being developed as the investigation progresses on Mars. We also provide some examples of data sets and analyses that help to validate the accuracy and precision of the calibration.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
From: SWiederwax@marazzitile.com

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: gilberg@gsfpc.com

Date: 11/18/2010 04:02 PM

Subject: American Marazzi Stack Testing

Jeff

This is to confirm your agreement during our conference call of November 17, 2010 to allow American

Marazzi Tile to make a change in two of the sources to be tested under the March 12, 2010 ICR for our

Sunnyvale Facility as noted below.

1. Because of market conditions Kiln RK

- 1 has been temporarily idled and will not be able to be tested

for the agreed upon HAP metals. In its place we w ill test Kiln RK

- 4 for HAP metals. The tile produced in

both of these kilns use shale instead of ball clay in its formulation. Further, Kiln RK

- 4 has a higher

throughput capacity than Kiln, RK

- 1.

2. Because of production requirements Kiln RK

- 5L (Kil n 5 Lower Channel) will only be producing at 50

- 60% of capacity therefore we will be testing Kiln RK

- 5U (Kiln 5 Upper Channel) which will be producing at

over 90% of capacity for all agreed upon pollutants. Tile being produced from both of these kilns us e ball

clay in its formulation. Further, as described in our representativeness presentation, there are no

differences in kilns RK

- 5L and RK

- 5U.

We believe that these changes will provide stack test results that are more representative of normal

operati ng conditions.

Steve

Steven T. Wiederwax

Safety and Environmental Manager

American Marazzi Tile/Monarch Ceramic Tile

Tel: 972

- 226

- 0110 x 2222

Fax: 972

- 226

- 0389
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 198 (Friday, October 13, 2006)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 60652-60653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X06-31013]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TD13OC06.001


[[Page 60653]]
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Long‐term surveys support declines in early‐season forest plants used by bumblebees      

      April 18, 2021    

                            - Populations of bumble bees and other pollinators have declined over the past several decades due to numerous threats, including habitat loss and degradation. However, we can rarely investigate the role of resource loss due to a lack of detailed long‐term records of forage plants and habitats.
                            - We use 22‐year repeated surveys of more than 262 sites located in grassland, forest, and wetland habitats across Illinois, USA to explore how the abundance and richness of bumble bee food plants have changed over the period of decline of the endangered rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis).
                            - We document a decline in abundance of bumble bee forage plants in forest understories, which our phenology analysis suggests provide the primary nectar and pollen sources for foundress queens in spring, a critical life stage in bumble bee demography. By contrast, the per‐unit area abundance of food plants in primarily midsummer‐flowering grassland and wetland habitats has not declined. However, the total area of grasslands has declined across the region resulting in a net loss of grassland resources.
                            - Synthesis and applications. Our results suggest a decline in spring‐flowering forest understory plants is a previously unappreciated bumble bee stressor, compounding factors like agricultural intensification, novel pathogen exposure, and grassland habitat loss. These findings emphasize the need for greater consideration of habitat complementarity in bumble bee conservation. We conclude that continued loss of early‐season floral resources may add additional stress to critical life stages of bumble bees and limit restoration efforts if not explicitly considered in pollinator conservation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             John M Mola, Ph.D.  (Former Employee)          

##### Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

#### Ian Pearse, PhD

#####  Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

ipearse@usgs.gov

970-226-9145

## Related Content

####             John M Mola, Ph.D.  (Former Employee)          

##### Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

#### Ian Pearse, PhD

#####  Research Ecologist

Fort Collins Science Center

ipearse@usgs.gov

970-226-9145

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Illinois

View All **
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Nos. DA 21 - 0624 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KENNETH WAYNE DALY,

Defendant and Appellant.

_______________________________________________________________ **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 12, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal in this matter .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2022

12/22/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0624
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, Robert K. Bench, the Principal Executive Officer of CoConnect, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:  1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K Amendment No.1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this October 16, 2012.   /s/ Robert K. Bench Robert K. Bench Principal Executive Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CoConnect, Inc. and will be retained by CoConnect, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Samantha Haimo 

Thursday, September 5, 2019 4:43 PM 

Robert Gibson; 'Frank Zokaites'; Holly Way; Gruher, Barry; Suarez, Jesus; Jeffrey Siskind 

Holly Way 

RE: Deposition of Robert Gibson 

RobertThank you for your response. 

EveryonePlease hold September 24th for Robert's deposition and I will send out a Notice this week. I will schedule the deposition 

to begin at 10:30 am in Boca Raton. 

Thank you. 

PLEASE NOTE MY NEW OFFICE LOCATION BELOW 

Samantha Tesser Haimo 

Feigeles & Haimo LLP 

7900 Peters Road - Suite B-200 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33324 

T.954.376.5956 

F.954.206.0188 

STH@womenatlawfl.com 

www.womenatlawfl.com 

From: Robert Gibson <intelexigent@gmail.com> 

Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 3:30 PM 

To: Samantha Haimo <sth@womenatlawfl.com> 

Cc: 'Frank Zokaites' <frank@zokaites.com>; Holly Way <way@womenatlawfl.com>; Gruher, Barry <bgruher@gjblaw.com>; Suarez, Jesus <jsuarez@gjb-law.com>; Jeffrey Siskind <jeffsiskind@msn.com> 

Subject: Re: Deposition of Robert Gibson 

Ms. Haimo, 

I am not available September 20, 2019. 

I have a morning hearing on September 24, 2019, but have no conflict after 10:30 a.m. I would need additional time for 

travel from downtown West Palm Beach. 

I have no conflict on September 23, 2019, which is the date that has been discussed up until your most recent email. 

Please advise. 

Robert Gibson, C-2000695 

lntelexigent, Unltd., A-9800293 

1 

i 

EXHIBIT 

;4 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 40-1 Filed 09/23/19 Page 1 of 2
313 Datura Street, Suite 200 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

Tel. (561) 868-2100 Fax (888) 737-8336 

On 2019-09-04 10:32 AM, Samantha Haimo wrote: 

RobertI have heard back from all other parties regarding scheduling your deposition but still have not heard 

back from you. 

Please confirm your availability for your deposition on either September 20

th or September 24

th

• 

Thank you. 

PLEASE NOTE MY NEW OFFICE LOCA T/ON BELOW 

~ Samantha Tesser Haimo 

_j 

~ Feigeles & Haimo LLP 

z 7900 Peters Road - Suite B-200 

w 

2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33324 

0 3 T.954.376.5956 

F.954.206.0188 

STH@womenatlawfl.com 

www.womenatlawfl.com 

From: Samantha Haimo 

Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:05 PM 

To: Suarez, Jesus <jsuarez@gjb-law.com>; Jeffrey Siskind <jeffsiskind@msn.com>; Robert Gibson 

<intelexigent@gmail.com> 

Cc: Frank Zokaites <frank@zokaites.com>; Holly Way <way@womenatlawfl.com> 

Subject: RE: Deposition of Robert Gibson 

Please advise which of the following days would work for you to schedule Robert Gibson's deposition: 

September 6, 13, 16, 19, 20 or 23? 

Thank you. 

PLEASE NOTE MY NEW OFFICE LOCATION BELOW 

~ Samantha Tesser Haimo 

_j 

~ Feigeles & Haimo LLP 

z 7900 Peters Road - Suite B-200 

w 

2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33324 

0 3 T.954.376.5956 

F.954.206.0188 

STH@womenatlawfl.com 

www.womenatlawfl.com 

2 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 40-1 Filed 09/23/19 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 233 (Monday, December 7, 2009)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 64342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X09-201207]


[[Page 64342]]




GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA)



Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities
 The General Services Administration (GSA) establishes agency 
acquisition rules and guidance through the General Services Acquisition 
Regulation (GSAR), which contains agency acquisition policies and 
practices, contract clauses, solicitation provisions, and forms that 
control the relationship between GSA and contractors and prospective 
contractors.
 GSA's fiscal year 2010 regulatory priority is to continue with the 
complete rewrite of the GSAR. GSA is rewriting the GSAR to maintain 
consistency with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and to 
implement streamlined and innovative acquisition procedures that 
contractors, offerors, and GSA contracting personnel can utilize when 
entering into and administering contractual relationships.
 GSA will clarify the GSAR to--
<bullet> Provide consistency with the FAR;
<bullet> Eliminate coverage which duplicates the FAR or creates 
            inconsistencies within the GSAR;
<bullet> Correct inappropriate references listed to indicate the basis 
            for the regulation;
<bullet> Rewrite sections which have become irrelevant because of 
            changes in technology or business processes, or which place 
            unnecessary administrative burdens on contractors and the 
            Government;
<bullet> Streamline or simplify the regulation;
<bullet> Roll up coverage from the services and regions/zones which 
            should be in the GSAR;
<bullet> Provide new and/or augmented coverage; and
<bullet> Delete unnecessary burdens on small businesses.
BILLING CODE 6820-34-S
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

25 , 2011 

### On July 20 th 

### , 2011 we held a conference call with Ody ne Sy stems, L LC to discuss concerns raised by hy

brid manufacturers r egarding heavy - duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. H yb rid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and industry trade groups raised concerns during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy - duty hy brid applications may

not be able to meet the 2013 heavy- duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking . 1 , 2 

### Attendees from the EPA and Ody

ne are shown in the table below. **Attendee Affiliation**  Cleophas Jackson EPA Anthony Neam EPA Amy Kopin EPA Joe Dalum Odyne Dr. Phillip Eidler Odyne Bill Mammen Odyne

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished D ecember 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Syst ems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa .gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**SAVICORP.OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

 

I, Serge Monros,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SaviCorp;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) [Omittedpursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

 

(c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: October 24, 2013

 

/s/ SERGE MONROS

Serge Monros

Chief Financial Officer