alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2017 Insolvency - Intercompany

Chance & Anthem, LLC (Case No.: 18-16248-MAM)

Consolidated Insolvency Analysis - Intercompany Detail

Year Ended December 31, 2017

Description

Chance & 

Anthem FLACC 

 Siskind 

Legal 

 Sovereign 

Gaming Sympatico Consolidated 

ASSETS

Due from Related Entities

Due from Chance & Anthem 770,049.00 7,250.00 1,000.00 3,481.00 781,780.00

Due from FLACC 321,035.95 842.26 1,202,500.00 8,850.00 1,533,228.21

Due from Siskind Legal 55,810.20 185,000.00 10,510.00 251,320.20

Due from Sovereign Gaming 60,581.00 46,500.00 107,081.00

Due from Sympatico 9,442.50 15,033.31 13,590.00 38,065.81

Transfers between Chance accounts 9,720.00 9,720.00

Transfers between FLACC accounts 500.00 500.00

Total Assets $ 456,589.65 $ 1,017,082.31 $ 21,682.26 $ 1,203,500.00 $ 22,841.00 $ 2,721,695.22

LIABILITIES

Due to Related Entities

Due to Chance & Anthem 1,091,084.95 62,310.20 61,581.00 3,506.00 1,218,482.15

Due to FLACC - 185,000.00 46,500.00 15,033.31 246,533.31

Due to Siskind Legal - 842.26 14,866.50 15,708.76

Due to Sovereign Gaming 1,202,500.00 1,202,500.00

Due to Sympatico 2,441.00 8,850.00 16,960.00 28,251.00

Transfers between Siskind Legal accounts - -

Transfers between Chance accounts 9,720.00 9,720.00

Transfers between FLACC accounts 500.00 500.00

Total Liabilities $ 12,161.00 $ 2,303,777.21 $ 264,270.20 $ 108,081.00 $ 33,405.81 $ 2,721,695.22

Net Activity $ -

FOOTNOTES:

*Intercompany activity does not cross reconcile due differences between the Chance and Siskind Legal bank reconstructions. The differences in total are as follows:

Chance & Anthem - $7,726.50; Siskind Legal - $(6,976.50); and Sympatico - $(750) (which together net to $0).

GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC Page 1 of 1

SCHEDULE 4.4

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 478-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 214 (Monday, November 6, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 56093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-31106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-36407; File No. SR-NYSE-95-32]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate 
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange, 
Inc. Relating to Additions to the ``List of Exchange Rule Violations 
and Fines Applicable Thereto Pursuant to Rule 476A''

Correction

    In notice document 95-26895 beginning on page 55403 in the issue of 
Tuesday, October 31, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 55404, in the third column, insert the following signature 
before the FR Doc. line:
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2004289EN.01001301.xml

| 26.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3446 — UNIQA/MANNHEIMER)

(2004/C 289/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CDE’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3446. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CDE’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3446. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00124-CV

Detran Levy, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. AG 07-001250, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Detran Levyappeals the district court’s final order appointing a non-parent

as managing conservator for his daughter and appointing him possessory conservator with standard

visitation rights. Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. See Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 107.013 (West 2008) (stating that indigent

parent is entitled to appointed counsel in proceedings by governmental entity seeking to terminate

the parent-child relationship or seeking appointment as temporarymanaging conservator). The brief

meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on

appeal. See In re L.K.H., No. 11-10-00080-CV, 2010 WL 3621840, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland

Sept. 16, 2010) (abatement order, not released for publication) (applying Anders in appeal from

order appointing Texas Department of Family and Protective Services as permanent managing
conservator), motion granted, 2011 WL 846067, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland Mar. 10, 2011, no pet.)

(mem. op.); cf. Taylor v. Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47

(Tex. App.—Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of

parental rights); In re K.S.M., 61 S.W.3d 632, 634 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2001, no pet.) (noting that

whether proceeding is criminal or civil “makes no difference in the duties court-appointed counsel

owes his or her client”); In re A.W.T., 61 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, no pet.) (stating

that “[t]he rationale underlying Anders is no less applicable to a civil matter in which counsel has

been appointed to represent the appellant” because it is premised on attorney’s need to balance

zealous representation of client against prohibition against prosecuting meritless appeal). Counsel

has certified to this Court that he provided appellant with a copy of the Anders brief and a notice of

his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. Finding nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Rose

Affirmed

Filed: July 12, 2012

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3592 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3592

   To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to encourage the use of 
                  locally grown food in meal programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2012

  Mr. Bennet introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to encourage the use of 
                  locally grown food in meal programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Locally Grown Foods for Older 
Americans Act''.

SEC. 2. LOCALLY GROWN FOOD.

    Section 339(2) of the Older Americans Act of 1965 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (J), by striking ``, and'' and 
        inserting a comma;
            (2) in subparagraph (K), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``, and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(L) where feasible, encourages the use of locally 
                grown foods in meal programs and identifies potential 
                partnerships and contracts with local producers and 
                providers of locally grown foods.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**** 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**UNDER**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

I, Michael R. Haynes, Chief Executive Officer of Collectors Universe, Inc., certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Collectors Universe, Inc., for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) for the registrant and we have:

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 21, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10621]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John J. McGovern,
Executive Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  September 13, 2006         /s/ John J. McGovern
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  John J. McGovern
                                  Executive Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer
# L_2004320EN.01001501.xml

| 21.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 320/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 320/15

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1821/2004

of 20 October 2004

on the issue of import licences for certain preserved mushrooms imported under the autonomous tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1749/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1749/2004 of 7 October 2004 opening and providing for the administration of an autonomous tariff quota for preserved mushrooms (1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Import licences applied for by traditional importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1749/2004 and submitted to the Commission on 19 October 2004 shall be issued for 9,33 % of the quantity applied for.

2.   Import licences applied for by new importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1749/2004 and submitted to the Commission on 19 October 2004 shall be issued for 7,69 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 October 2004.

It shall apply until 31 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture

---

(1)  
  OJ L 312, 9.10.2004, p. 3.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mars: Water, water everywhere      

      April 8, 2004    

Mars is a very watery planet, but all the water seems to be frozen. Divining the amount and distribution of this water, past and present, is essential for understanding martian climates, and more.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
Form CGFCRD3 (4/4/2019)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 18−16248−MAM Adversary Number: 19−01298−MAM

In re:

Name of Debtor(s): Chance & Anthem, LLC

 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

Robert C Furr

Plaintiff(s)

VS.

Jeffrey M Siskind, Siskind Legal Services, Tanya Siskind, Second

Siskind Family Trust, Frank R. Zokaites, CannaMed Pharmaceuticals,

LLC, OB Real Estate Holdings 1732, LLC, Sovereign Gaming and

Entertainment, LLC, Florida's Association of Community Banks and

Credit Unions, Incorporated, Sympatico Equine Rescue, Inc.,

Wellington 3445, LP, Zokaites Properties, LP and Robert Gibson

Defendant(s)

 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on November 26, 2019 at 10:00 AM at the

following location:

Flagler Waterview Building

1515 N Flagler Dr Room 801 Courtroom A

West Palm Beach FL 33401

to consider the following:

Motion to Reconsider (Re: 92 Order on Miscellaneous Motion, Order on Amended Motion) Filed by

Defendants CannaMed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Florida's Association of Community Banks and

Credit Unions, Incorporated, Second Siskind Family Trust, Tanya Siskind, Siskind Legal Services,

Sympatico Equine Rescue, Inc. (102)

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party

who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard

thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 11/6/19 CLERK OF COURT

By: Maria Romaguera−Serfaty

Courtroom Deputy

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 104 Filed 11/06/19 Page 1 of 1
CCA # 13-13-00547-CR

STYLE: Jorge Garcia v. The State of Texas

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURT #:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE:

138th District Court

98-CR-446-B

Hon. Arturo Nelson

Cisneros

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

DATE:

JUSTICE: PC

PUBLISH:

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APPBR:

DNP:

iao-/r FILE COPY

OFFENSE: Aggravated Sexual Assault

COUNTY: Cameron

FOR REHEARING IS:.

DATE: 12/18/2014

JUDGE: LONGORIA

SUPPCLKRECORD

SUPPRPTRECORD.

SUPP BR

PROSE BR

MOTION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APPELLANT'S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: Qt///S/Zp/S~

JUDGE:

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

fA U*SUfrC~

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA# \Q.O-/f

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0053

_________________

A & A CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

 Defendant-Appellee

O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the 

Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing Appellant A & A Construction, 

Inc.’s opening brief filed electronically on April 7, 2020, this Court has determined that 

the brief does not comply with the Rules and must be resubmitted. 

M. R. App. P. 11(6)(b)(iii) requires the cover page to include the name, the venue 

of the tribunal, and the judge in which the case originated or from which an appeal is 

taken. Appellant’s brief includes the name and venue of the tribunal from which this 

appeal is taken but not the name of the presiding judge.

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(d) requires a “statement of the facts relevant to the issues 

presented for review, with references to the pages or the parts of the record at which 

material facts appear.” Appellant’s brief includes a discussion of the facts, but the 

statement of facts does not contain appropriate references to the record. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the 

Appellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing 

the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rules, and the Appellant shall serve 

copies of the revised brief on all parties of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 

04/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0053
those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to all parties of record. 

DATED this _____ day of April, 2020.

For the Court

By_________________________

Justice

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 8 2020
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3594 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the alternative 

tax liability limitation for small property and casualty insurance companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the alternative tax liability limitation for small property 

and casualty insurance companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION FOR ALTERNATIVE 

4 TAX LIABILITY FOR SMALL PROPERTY AND 

5 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 831(b)(2)(A) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

8 as follows: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3594 IS

1 ‘‘(i) the net written premiums (or, if 

2 greater, direct written premiums) for the 

3 taxable year do not exceed $2,025,000, 

4 and’’. 

5 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec6 tion 831(b) of such Code is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

9 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

10 year after 2012, the dollar amount set forth in 

11 subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an 

12 amount equal to— 

13 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

14 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de15 termined under section 1(f)(3) for such 

16 calendar year by substituting ‘calendar 

17 year 2011’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub18 paragraph (B) thereof. 

19 If the amount as adjusted under the preceding 

20 sentence is not a multiple of $1,000, such 

21 amount shall be rounded to the next lowest 

22 multiple of $1,000.’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3594 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS