alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The undersigned court-appointed Mortgage Modification Mediation Mediator, reports

to the court as follows:

A. The final Mortgage Modification Mediation Mediator (MMM) conference was conducted on

06-18-2020 and the following parties were present:

1. [ ] The Debtor:

2. [ ] The Debtor's Attorney:

3. [ ] The Lender's Representative:

4. [ ] The Lender's Attorney:

B. The final MMM conference was scheduled for 06-18-2020 but not conducted for the

following reason:

1. [ x ] The parties settled prior to attending

2. [ ] The case was dismissed

3. [ ] The debtor failed to attend

4. [ ] The debtor's attorney failed to attend

5. [ ] The lender failed to attend

6. [ ] The lender's attorney failed to attend

7. [ ] Other

C. The result of the MMM conference is as follows:

1. [ ] The parties reached an agreement

2. [ ] The parties did not reach an agreement

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In Re: Case #19-17540-LMI

Debtor: Raymond Aviles, Jr. Chapter 13

FINAL REPORT OF LOSS MITIGATION MEDIATOR

Dated: 06.17.20 Signature of Mediator: //s// Anthony Roca

Printed Name: Anthony Roca

Address: 6303 Blue Lagoon Drive Suite 400 Miami, FL

33126

Copies To: Phone: (305) 771-3529

[All Parties to Mediation] Email: tony@rocalaw.com

Case 19-17540-LMI Doc 50 Filed 06/17/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3671 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3671

  To provide certain assistance to North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
                                allies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2012

   Mr. Lugar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide certain assistance to North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
                                allies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRADE WITH NATO ALLIES.

    The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is amended by inserting after 
section 667 (22 U.S.C. 2427) the following:

``SEC. 668. CERTAIN TRADE WITH NATO ALLIES.

    ``For purposes of section 3(c) of the Act of June 21, 1938, each 
North Atlantic Treaty Organization member nation shall be treated as a 
nation with which there is in effect a free trade agreement.''.
                                 <all>
```
Description of the Registrants 2011 Executive VP Sales Incentive Program



 Exhibit 10.6b 
 Executive Vice President Sales Incentive Plan 
 SIP Targets 

 

	 	•	 	 Variable compensation opportunity for the Executive Vice President of Sales is based on a revenue target and MIP EBITDA Target.




	 	•	 	 The weighting of the target is based on the following ratios: 



	 	•	 	 50% MIP EBITDA – same structure as rest of management team 



	 	•	 	 50% Revenue – Plan goal of ** 



	 	•	 	 SIP payout target is $300,000 annually, but will be pro-rated based on months employed. 



	 	•	 	 The payment of bonus will be on an annual basis, based on year end results. 


 Executive Vice President Sales - Example 
  

				0000000000	
	 Salary
	    	 	$300,000	  
	 Potential Bonus
	    	 	$300,000	  
	 Total Annual Comp
	    	 	$600,000	  
	 	    	 	 	 
	 Paid Bonus
	    	 	$178,777	  
	 	    	 	 	 
	 Pro Rated Months
	    	 	6	  
	 	    	 	 	 
	 Revenue
	    	 	50%	  
	 MIP Target
	    	 	50%	  
	 	    	 	 	 
	 Revenue Target
	    	 	**	  
	 	    	 	 	 
	 MIP Target
	    	 	**	  
	 	    	 	 	 
	 Actual
Revenue - Example    
	    	 	**	  
	 	    	 	 	 








  

			
	Actual EBITDA - Example  	  	       
                         **

 ** Redacted 
 Potential Payment Outcomes 

Pro-Rated Bonus 
  

																																	
	  	  	Actual
Revenue
	  	  	  	  	
Target


- $30  
million
	 	  	
Target


- $20  
million
	 	  	
Target


- $10  
million
	 	  	 Target

 
	 	  	Target
+$10  
million	 	  	Target
+$20  
million	 	  	Target
+$30  
million	 	  	
Target
+$40  


million

	 	  	 Target


- $12 million
	  	 	$0	  	  	 	$58,487	  	  	 	$59,218	  	  	 	$59,949	  	  	 	$60,680	  	  	 	$61,411	  	  	 	$62,142	  	  	    $62,873
	 	  	 Target

 -
$8 million
	  	 	$0	  	  	 	$58,487	  	  	 	$59,218	  	  	 	$59,949	  	  	 	$60,680	  	  	 	$61,411	  	  	 	$62,142	  	  	
    $62,873

	 Achieved

 EBITDA

 
	  	 Target

 -
$4 million
	  	 	$90,000	  	  	 	$148,487	  	  	 	$149,218	  	  	 	$149,949	  	  	 	$150,680	  	  	 	$151,411	  	  	 	$152,142	  	  	  $152,873
	  	
Target
	  	 	$117,000	  	  	 	$175,487	  	  	 	$176,218	  	  	 	$176,949	  	  	 	$177,680	  	  	 	$178,411	  	  	 	$179,142	  	  	  $179,873
	 	  	 Target

 +
$4 million
	  	 	$122,087	  	  	 	$180,574	  	  	 	$181,305	  	  	 	$182,036	  	  	 	$182,767	  	  	 	$183,498	  	  	 	$184,229	  	  	  $184,960
	 	  	 Target

 +
$8 million
	  	 	$127,174	  	  	 	$185,661	  	  	 	$186,392	  	  	 	$187,123	  	  	 	$187,854	  	  	 	$188,585	  	  	 	$189,316	  	  	  $190,047
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3243

___________________________

In re: Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________

 Submitted: September 25, 2017

Filed: October 6, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Greg Boss’s home in the Eastern District of Missouri suffered hail damage in

June 2014. Boss filed a property damage claim under the replacement cost

homeowners’ insurance policy issued by Travelers Home and Marine Insurance

Company. After Travelers paid Bossthe “actual cash value” of the loss prior to repair

or replacement, Boss brought this putative class action in the Western District of

Missouri, alleging that Travelers breached the insurance contract by deducting “labor

depreciation” from the estimated replacement cost in determining actual cash value. 

Travelers filed a motion to transfer venue “[f]or the convenience of parties and

witnesses, in the interest of justice,” to the Eastern District of Missouri, where the

insured property,Travelers’ Missouri claimoffice, and all Missouri-based documents
and witnesses are located. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The district court denied the motion,

and Travelers petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus instructing the district

court to transfer venue to the Eastern District of Missouri. “[W]e have recognized

that the writ of mandamus is proper, albeit extraordinary, relief for an erroneous

ruling on a motion to transfer under § 1404(a).” In re Apple, Inc., 602 F.3d 909, 912

(8th Cir. 2010).

In its Order denying the motion to transfer venue, the district court relied, to

a substantial extent, on the fact that “the issue most likely to be in dispute in this case

is whether labor is depreciable when actual cash value is calculated. This very issue

has been previously addressed by the Court” in LaBrier v. State Farm Fire & Cas.

Co., 147 F. Supp. 3d 839 (W.D. Mo. 2015). With interlocutory appeals in the LaBrier

case also pending, on August 11, 2016 we entered an order in this case “that the

petition will be held in abeyance pending the entry of a dispositive order in No. 16-

3185, In re State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.” We have now filed an opinion reversing the

district court’s resolution of the labor depreciation issue in LaBrier and its

certification of a class in that case, and remanding with directions to dismiss the

named plaintiff’s complaint. In re: State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Nos. 16-3185 and 16-

3562 (8th Cir. Sept. 25, 2017). Accordingly, we now grant the petition for a writ of

mandamus, vacate the district court’s Order dated June 8, 2016, and remand for

further proceedings in light of our decision in In re: State Farm.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Poseidis, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John J. McGovern, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the period presented in the Report.


Dated: September 27, 2007
                                          /S/ JOHN J. MCGOVERN
                                          --------------------
                                          John J. McGovern
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 42 (Friday, March 3, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 12034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-30303]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Docket No. AB-101 (Sub-No. 12X)]


Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company--Abandonment 
Exemption--St. Louis County, MN

Correction

    In notice document 95-4032 beginning on page 9397 in the issue of 
Friday, February 17, 1995, the Docket Number should appear as set forth 
above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
pre

- obtained consent.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size,

weight, speed of the UAS as well as location where it is

operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the

property owner. Because of the advance notice to the

property owner and participants in the photographic activity,

all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight

operations as set forth in the O perating Manual. Compared

to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far

more than the maximum 5 lbs. proposed herein and the lack

of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations

is far less than those presently presented wi th conventional

aircraft operating at or below 500 ft. AGL. In addition, the

low

- altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation

between these small UAS operations and the operations of

conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.



## 14 CFR §91.121: Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to

maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is

set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an

appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As

the sUAS will not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a

GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator,

pursuant to the Operating Manual and Safety Check list,

confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS

altitude indicator before flight.



## 14 CFR §91.151 (a): Fuel Requirements for

Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a

flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is

enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and,

assuming normal c ruising speed

– (1) During the day, to fly

after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after

that for at least 45 minutes.”
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Conference Papers 

#           Numerical model for the uptake of groundwater contaminants by phreatophytes      

      January 1, 2008    

Conventional solute transport models do not adequately account for the effects of phreatophytic plant systems on contaminant concentrations in shallow groundwater systems. A numerical model was developed and tested to simulate threedimensional reactive solute transport in a heterogeneous porous medium. Advective-dispersive transport is coupled to biodegradation, sorption, and plantbased attenuation processes including plant uptake and sorption by plant roots. The latter effects are a function of the physical-chemical properties of the individual solutes and plant species. Models for plant uptake were tested and evaluated using the experimental data collected at a field site comprised of hybrid poplar trees. A non-linear equilibrium isotherm model best represented site conditions.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Preliminary geomagnetic data, College Observatory, Fairbanks, Alaska: October 1983      

      January 1, 1983    

View Document

The preliminary geomagnetic data included here is made available to scientific personnel and organizations, as part of a cooperative effort and on a data exchange basis because of the early need by some users. To avoid delay, all of the data is copied from original forms processed at the observatory; therefore it should be regarded as preliminary.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Alaska
                  - College Observatory

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Internal cave gating for protection of colonies of the endangered gray bat (Myotis grisescens)      

      January 1, 2003    

Persistent human disturbance is a major cause for the decline in populations of many cave-dwelling bats and other sensitive cave-obligate organisms. Cave gating has been used to eliminate human disturbance, but few studies have assessed directly the impact of such management activities on resident bats. In northeastern Oklahoma, USA, 25 entrances of caves inhabited by two endangered species and one endangered subspecies of bats are protected from human entry with internal gates. Because cave gates may impede ingress and egress of bats at caves, we evaluated the impacts of internal gates before and after their construction at six colonies of endangered gray bats (Myotis grisescens) from 1981 to 2001. No caves were abandoned by gray bats after the construction of internal gates; in fact, total numbers of gray bats using the six caves increased from 60,130 in 1981 to 70,640 in 2001. Two caves harbored more gray bats after gating, and three caves had no change in gray bat numbers after gating. We also compared initiations of emergences at three gated and three open-passage caves in June and July 1999–2000. No differences in timing of initiation of emergence were found between colonies in gated versus open-passage caves. Our results support the use of internal gates to protect and thereby enhance recovery of colonies of endangered gray bats. Additional research is encouraged to confirm that our observations on gray bats are generally applicable to other species of cave-dwelling bats.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - northeastern Oklahoma
                  - Oklahoma

View All **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No.: 19-26821-PGH

Chapter 13 

KATRINA LYNN VALENTINO

 Debtor /

DEBTOR’S MOTION TO TOLL

The Debtor, KATRINA LYNN VALENTINO, by and through his undersigned attorney 

and files this Motion to Toll, and in support thereof would show as follows:

1. On December 17, 2019, the Debtor filed a Petition for Relief under Chapter 13 of 

the Bankruptcy Code.

2. The Debtor timely filed all Schedules required pursuant to Rule 3015 of the 

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

3. On or about October 18, 2019, the Debtor paid $3,200.00 to her wife’s parents, 

Christine Fox and Drew Fox for the repayment of a loan.

4. The undersigned counsel has been unable to get in contact with Christine Fox and 

Drew Fox in order for them to sign the Tolling Agreement.

5. The Trustee has asserted claims that the transfer and the Transferee’s interest in 

the Property are avoidable under 11 U.S.C. Sections 544, 545, 547, 548, or 549 (“the Claims”).

6. The Claims Bar date was February 26, 2020.

WHEREFORE, Debtors, KATRINA LYNN VALENTINO, respectfully moves this 

Court to enter and order tolling the preferential payment made to Christine Fox and Drew Fox,

and for such other and further relief as justice may require.

Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 31 Filed 02/28/20 Page 1 of 2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the U.S. District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice 

in this Court set forth in Local Rule 910 (d) (1) & (2).

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Toll were 

furnished by U.S. Mail and/or CM/ECF to the parties on the attached matrix on this 28th day of 

February, 2020. 

VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.

330 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 450

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

(954) 765-3166

(954) 756-7103 (facsimile)

Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

By: /s/ Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.

Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.

 FL Bar 64500

Case 19-26821-PGH Doc 31 Filed 02/28/20 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Late quaternary regional geoarchaeology of Southeast Alaska Karst: A progress report      

      January 1, 1997    

Karst systems, sea caves, and rock shelters within the coastal temperate rain forest of Alaska's Alexander Archipelago preserve important records of regional archaeology, sea level history, glacial and climatic history, and vertebrate paleontology. Two 14C AMS dates on human bone discovered in a remote cave (49-PET-408) on Prince of Wales Island document the oldest reliably dated human in Alaska to ca. 9800 B.P. A series of 14C AMS dates from cave deposits span the past 40,000 years and provide the first evidence of Pleistocene faunas from the northwest coast of North America. Other discoveries include sea caves and marine beach deposits elevated above modern sea level, extensive solution caves, and mammalian remains of species previously undocumented within the region. Records of human activity, including cave art, artifacts, and habitation sites may provide new insights into the early human colonization of the Americas. ??1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
officer of Document Capture Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:




(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:
      November 15, 2010
                  
                  /s/David P.
      ClarkDavid
      P. Clark,
                        Chief
      Executive Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHARON HAMPTON

, Appellant,

v.

HOLLYWOOD TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation not

- for

- profit

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 801

[ April 19, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Mily Rodriguez Powell , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE06

- 005188 (03)

.

Robert F. Reynolds of Slatkin & Reynolds, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert P. Gossett of Gosse tt & Gossett, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 5D16-2334

FLORIDA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

A/A/O LOUIS PENA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

Petition for Certiorari Review 

Decision from the Circuit Court

for Orange County Acting in

its Appellate Capacity.

Douglas H. Stein, of Bowman and Brooke, 

LLP, Coral Gables, for Petitioner.

Chad A. Barr, of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, 

P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Respondent.

Lawrence M. Kopelman, of Lawrence M. 

Kopelman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale and Mac S. 

Phillips and Chris Tadros, of Phillips Tadros, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, as Amicus Curiae 

Floridians for Fair Insurance, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Progressive Select Insurance Company (hereinafter “Progressive”) petitions this 

court for a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash an opinion issued by the Circuit Court for 

Orange County, sitting in its appellate capacity, which affirmed the final judgment entered 
2

by the County Court. We deny the petition based upon the reasoning set forth in our 

opinion in Progressive Select Insurance v. Florida Hospital Medical Center A/A/O 

Jonathan Parent, No. 5D16-2333 (Fla. 5th DCA Nov. 17, 2017).

PETITION DENIED.

SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

PALMER, J., dissents, with opinion. 
3

PALMER, J., dissenting. 5D16-2334

I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissent in Progressive 

Selective Insurance Co. v. Florida Hospital Medical Center A/A/O Jonathan Parent,

No. 5D16-2333 (Fla. 5th DCA November 17, 2017).
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 5207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-20126]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------